Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/1998• MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA A G E N D A TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1998 - 9:00 A.M. County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS John W. Tippin, Chairman (District 4) Kenneth R. Macht, Vice Chairman (District 3) Fran B. Adams (District 1) Carolyn K. Eggert (District 2) Caroline D. Ginn (District 5) James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP PAGES 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - James E. Chandler 4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ADDMONS: 11.GA Emergency Beach Item (7.G. MOVED and heard with this item) 13.C.1. Information on LAMAC's Recommendation (White Paper) 5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated October 29, 1998) 1-10 B. Purchase of Slide Projector & Overhead Projector (memorandum dated November 2, 1998) 11 C. Request for Approval of Progress Report and Reimbursement Invoice #3 for the 1998 Trans- portation Disadvantaged Planning Grant (memorandum dated October 29, 1998) 12-22 D. Fairways at Grand Harbor, LTD Request for Final Plat Approval for a Multi -Family Residential Planned Development to be Known as The Fairways at Grand Harbor (memorandum dated November 1, 1998) 23-27 BOOK 10.7 PAGE 494 9:05 A.M. BOOK 107 PAGE 405 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd ): BACKUP E. Board Approve of Extension to the Florida Com- PAGES munities Trust (FCT) Cost -Share Agreement for Purchase of the Lost Tree Islands (memorandum dated November 4, 1998) 28-30 F. Bid Award: IRC Bid #9021- Sebastian Water Assessment Project, Phase 2B (Util. Services) (memorandum dated November 3, 1998) 31-44 G. Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal (memorandum dated October 28, 1998) 45 H. Request to Use Courthouse (memorandum dated October 30, 1998) 46-47 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES A. Tax Collector's Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 (letter dated Oct. 30, 1998) 48-54 B. Sheriffs Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 (letter dated October 30, 1998) 55-58 C. Property Appraiser's Financial Report for FY End- ing 9/30/98 (letter dated Oct. 27, 1998) 59-64 D. Supervisor of Elections' Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 (letter dated October 30, 1998) 65-70 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Abandonment of Portions of 10" Street Between 37"' Ave. & 41s Ave. (Legislative) (memorandum dated November 2, 1998) 71-78 2. Approval of County Purchase of the North Sebastian C.A. Addition (Anstalt) Property Under the County Environmental Lands Program (memorandum dated November 3, 1998) 79-96 3. County Initiated Request to Amend the Text of the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of the Comprehensive Plan (Legislative) (memorandum dated November 2, 1998) 97-131 4. County Initiated Request to Amend the Com- prehensive Plan to Redesignate ±8 Acres from L-2 to C-1; to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±37 Acres from M-2 and C-2 to C-1; and to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±15.8 Acres from C-2 to C-1 (Legislative) (memorandum dated October 29, 1998) 132-158 9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): BACKUPPAGES B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS None 10. COUNTY ADM MSTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Commurift Development None B. Emergency Services None C. General Services None D. Leisure Services None E. Office of Management and Budget Optional Sales Tax - Third Five Years (memorandum dated November 3, 1998) 159-164 F. Personnel None G. Public Works 1. As -Built Resolution & Assessment Roll for Paving & Drainage Improvements to: 101s' Ave. Between 7911 Street & 871' Street in Vero Lake Estates Subdivision (memorandum dated October 27,1998) 165-183 2. Resolutions to Provide for Paving & Drainage Improvements to and set Public Hearing Date for: Paving & Drainage Improvements to Airport Drive Adjacent to Collier Club in Sebastian, Florida in Roseland Gardens Subdivision (memorandum dated October 28, 1998) 184-196 3. Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services - Second Grant for Agricultural Arena Building - Contract #4617 (memorandum dated November 3, 1998) 197-205 H. Utilities 1. Request for Proposals (RFP) for Master Planning Services (memorandum dated October 28, 1998) 206-211 2. Hallmark Homes Subdivision Petition Sewer Service (26h Ave. south of 8' Street) (memorandum dated November 2, 1998) 212-233 3. Westgate Colony Subdivision Petition Sewer Service (7" and 80°i Avenues, 79`' Court and 21" Street, north of St. Rd. 60) (memorandum dated November 2, 1998) 234-262 BOOK PAGE: gp OX 10.7 PAGE 11. DEPARTMENTAL, MATTERS (cont'd )• BACKUP L Human Services PAGES None 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman John W Tippin B. Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams D. Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Remarks Upon Retirement E. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS A. Emergency Services District 1. Approval of minutes - meeting of 10/27/98 2. Authorization to Execute Lease Purchase Financial Documents and Payment Schedule for Two Pumpers Received Prior and Included in the FY 1998/99 Budget; and Approval of Governing Body Resolution (memorandum dated November 4, 1998) 263-287 B. Solid Waste Disposal District None C. Environmental Control Board None 15. ADJOINT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times throughout the week Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening INDEX TO MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF NOVEMBER 10, 1998 1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1 2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ................................... 1 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ......................... 2 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ........................................ 2 7. CONSENT AGENDA 2 7.A. ............................................ Approval of Warrants ....................................... 2 7.13. Purchase of Slide Projector & Overhead Projector ................. 10 7.C. Progress Report and Reimbursement Invoice #3 - 1998 Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant - (Council on Aging) ............... 10 7.D. The Fairways at Grand Harbor - Final Plat Approval for a Multi -Family Residential Planned Development Requested by Fairways at Grand Harbor, LTD.................................................... 12 7.E. Lost Tree Islands - Extension of Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Cost - Share Agreement for Purchase ................................ 14 7.F. Bid Award #9021- Sebastian Water Assessment Project, Phase 2B - Utilities Department - Treasure Coast Contracting ................. 15 7.G. Equipment Declared Surplus for Sale or Disposal ................. 17 7.H. Use of Courthouse - Christmas in Downtown 1998 ................ 17 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS ................................... 18 8.A. Tax Collector's Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 ............ 18 8.B. Sheriff's Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 ................. 19 8.C. Property Appraiser's Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 ........ 20 8.D. Supervisor of Elections' Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 ..... 21 9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 98-122 - ABANDONMENT OF PORTIONS OF 10TH STREET BETWEEN 37TH AVENUE & 41ST AVENUE (LEGISLATIVE) ............................................... 23 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PURCHASE OF THE NORTH SEBASTIAN C.A. ADDITION (AMISTAD ANSTALT) PROPERTY UNDER THE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS PROGRAM ........................... 33 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 98-123 COUNTY -INITIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (LEGISLATIVE) ......................... 38 1 BOOK D7 PAGE" BOOK 10 F � PAGE 9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 98-124 COUNTY -INITIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE f8 ACRES FROM L-2 TO C-1; TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE 4-37 ACRES FROM M-2 AND C-2 TO C-1; AND TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±15.8 ACRES FROM C-2 TO C-1 (LEGISLATIVE) - ENVIRONMENTAL LAND: IRWIN TRACT, FLINN TRACT, AND GREEN SALTMARSH ................. 53 I I.E. OPTIONAL SALES TAX - THIRD FIVE YEARS ..................... 64 ILGA. RESOLUTION NO. 98-125 - AS -BUILT RESOLUTION AND ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 101ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET IN VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION ............................. 65 11.G.2. RESOLUTIONS NO. 98-126 AND 98-127- PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO AIRPORT DRIVE & HART AVENUE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, IN ROSELAND GARDENS SUBDIVISION (RESOLUTIONS I AND II) 84 l l.G.3. AGRICULTURAL ARENA BUILDING (FAIRGROUNDS) - SECOND GRANT FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES - CONTRACT 94617 .................. 95 l l.G.4. EMERGENCY BEACH ITEM - BEACH SCRAPING (HEARD WITH ITEM7.G.) .............................................. 96 11.H.1. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT MASTER PLANNING SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ADVERTISING APPROVED ....... 99 11.H.2. HALLMARK HOMES SUBDIVISION - PETITION SEWER SERVICE (26TH AVENUE, SOUTH OF 8TH STREET) .................. 100 11.H.3. WESTGATE COLONY SUBDIVISION - PETITION SEWER SERVICE (79TH AND 80TH AVENUES, 79TH COURT AND 21ST STREET, NORTH OF SR 60) ....................................... 102 13.C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS - INFORMATION ON LAMAC'S RECOMMENDATION (WHITE PAPER) CONCERNING JOINT TITLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAND PURCHASED BY THE TRUSTEES AND COUNTIES ........................................ 103 13.D. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT REMARKS UPON RETIREMENT ...................................................... 104 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ........................ 106 DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE PART OF THE RECORD -PROCLAMATION AND RETIREMENT AWARD TO COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT . 106 2 F-1 • November 10, 1998 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 251 Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, November 10, 1998. Present were John W. Tippin, Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert and Caroline D. Ginn. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. INVOCATION Chairman Tippin delivered the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Administrator Chandler led the Pledge to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Commissioner Adams requested the addition of items I LGA. Emergency Beach Item and 13.C.1. Information on LAMAC ("White Paper") ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously added the above items to the agenda. November 10, 1998 1 BOOK 107 PAGE e. 0 BOOK 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. (see end of minutes for Documents made part of the record) 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. 7. CONSENT AGENDA 107 PACE 501 Commissioner Adams requested that item 7.G. be moved to and discussed with 11.G.4. (No opposition expressed.) 7.A. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 1998: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1998 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06. Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of October 27 to October 29, 1998. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period October 27-29, 1998, as requested. November 10, 1998 2 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0019650 TRANS GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE 1998-10-27 3,565.40 0019651 RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES 1998-10-27 67,744.47 0019652 REGIONAL ENGINEERS 1998-10-27 4,636.50 0019653 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 1998-10-28 6,450.00 0019654 KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE 1998-10-28 138.50 0019655 BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1998-10-28 422.04 0019656 ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1998-10-28 135.20 0019657 ST LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1998-10-28 350.50 0019658 RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1998-10-28 150.00 0019659 VELASQUEZ, MERIDA 1998-10-28 200.00 0019660 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF 1998-10-28 5,431.17 0019661 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 1998-10-28 199.95 0019662 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 1998-10-28 200.00 0019663 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. 1998-10-28 1,932.00 0019664 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 1998-10-28 82,984.18 0019665 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 1998-10-28 257.69 0019666 NACO/SOUTHEAST 1998-10-28 4,689.41 0019667 KEY TRUST COMPANY 1998-10-28 596.21 0019668 OKEECHOBEE.CO., PMTS DOMES REL 1998-10-28 167.25 0019669 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 1998-10-28 100.00 0019670 DOUGLAS COUNTY CLERK OF COURT 1998-10-28 23.08 0241549 LYSNE, S G 1998-04-30 .00 0249974 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 1998-10-01 .00 0250082 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 1998-10-08 0250513 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 1998-10-15 .00(J3 X00 V 0250877 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 1998-10-22 .Q0 _ 0250962 NEW _HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 1998-10-22 .00 0251211 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 1998-10-29 119.50 0251212 ABC-CLIO INC 1998-10-29 168.53 0251213 AMERICAN WATER WORKS 1998-10-29 100.00 0251214 ACE PLUMBING, INC 1998-10-29 130.50 0251215 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 1998-10-29 170.00 0251216 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 1998-10-29 725.71 0251217 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO 1998-10-29 54.41 0251218 AT YOUR SERVICE 1998-10-29 1,911.20 0251219 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 1998-10-29 155.67 0251220 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 1998-10-29 323.17 0251221 AT EASE ARMY NAVY 1998-10-29 264.00 0251222 ATLANTIC REPORTING 1998-10-29 424.45 0251223 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 1998-10-29 59.90 0251224 ALRO METALS SERVICE CENTER 1998-10-29 72.66 0251225 ADDISON OIL CO 1998-10-29 237.33 0251226 A T & T 1998-10-29 82.53 0251227 A T & T LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 1998-10-29 162.90 0251228 AVID READER, THE 1998-10-29 481.50 0251229 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 1998-10-29 56.00 0251230 ALBERTSON'S 1998-10-29 305.86 0251231 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC 1998-10-29 1,281.31 0251232 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS 1998-10-29 181.61 0251233 APPERSON CHEMICALS,INC 1998-10-29 3,205.38 0251234 A T & T 1998-10-29 77.87 0251235 AUDIO MEMORY PUBLISHING 1998-10-29 108.60 0251236 ARNOFF MOVING 1998-10-29 725.00 0251237 AMERRICAN COASTAL COALITION 1998-10-29 500.00 0251238 AMELIA ISLAND MUSEUM OF HISTRY 1998-10-29 32.00 0251239 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND 1998-10-29 22,579.33 0251240 AQUACULTURE MAGAZINE 1998-10-29 19.00 0251241 ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1998-10-29 105.00 0251242 B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1998-10-29 803.04 0251243 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 1998-10-29 121.51 November 10, 1998 3 BOOK 10�7 PAGE X02 Fr BOOK 107 PAGE c�4��,> O 3 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0251244 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1998-10-29 6,481.36 0251245 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 1998-10-29 128.48 0251246 BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY 1998-10-29 2,090.25 0251247 BREATHING AIR SYSTEMS DIVISION 1998-10-29 1,440.00 0251248 BRISTER SIGNS 1998-10-29 120.00 0251249 BREVCO PROPERTIES, INC 1998-10-29 471.00 0251250 BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD 1998-10-29 800.00 0251251 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 1998-10-29 193,590.33 0251252 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 1998-10-29 3,656.25 0251253 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 1998-10-29 197.15 0251254 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC 1998-10-29 757.50 0251255 BOB'S BARRICADES, INC 1998-10-29 811.38 0251256 BARER & TAYLOR INC 1998-10-29 1,494.54 0251257 BRODART CO 1998-10-29 2,184.59 0251258 BLATUS, JAMES 1998-10-29 352.01 0251259 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION 1998-10-29 6.93 0251260 BOYD PUBLISHING COMPANY 1998-10-29 118.75 0251261 BELLSOUTH COMMUNICATION 1998-10-29 45.00 0251262 BILLING SERVICES INC 1998-10-29 214.06 0251263 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 1998-10-29 455.00 0251264 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 1998-10-29 79.72 0251265 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 1998-10-29 17.20 0251266 BELLSOUTH 1998-10-29 875.86 0251267 BOBCAT OF ORLANDO 1998-10-29 372.38 0251268 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 1998-10-29 22,589.64 0251269 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 1998-10-29 384.87 0251270 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 1998-10-29 62.87 0251271 BMG 1998-10-29 55.84 0251272 BLACKBURN, COLE 1998-10-29 14.16 0251273 BRAD RAGAM, INC 1998-10-29 3,720.00 0251274 BIG DIPPER PRODUCTIONS 1998-10-29 35.00 0251275 BUTCHER, GREG 1998-10-29 43.50 0251276 BECHT, EDWARD W. 1998-10-29 16,800.00 0251277 BAKER, BARBARA 1998-10-29 161.03 0251278 BAITA, CYNTHIA 1998-10-29 47.08 0251279 BERRY, BARBARA 1998-10-29 23.50 0251280 BROWN & CALDWELL 1998-10-29 2,819.56 0251281 CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY 1998-10-29 139.84 0251282 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC 1998-10-29 68,187.78 0251283 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 1998-10-29 3,947.33 0251284 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO., INC 1998-10-29 154,910.38 0251285 CENTRAL WINDOW OF 1998-10-29 49.50 0251286 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC 1998-10-29 540.03 0251287 CITRUS MOTEL ' 1998-10-29 180.00 0251288 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 1998-10-29 19.00 0251289 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 1998-10-29 383.95 0251290 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E 1998-10-29 556.50 0251291 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 1998-10-29 25,109.03 0251292 CLINIC PHARMACY 1998-10-29 549.00 0251293 COPELAND, LINDA 1998-10-29 49.00 0251294 CARTER & VERPLANCK 1998-10-29 38,400.00 0251295 COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF 1998-10-29 1,600.00 0251296 CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL 1998-10-29 325.00 0251297 COOGAN, MAUREEN 1998-10-29 387.28 0251298 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS 1998-10-29 682.70 0251299 CRAFTS & STUFF 1998-10-29 24•.32 0251300 CROSSROADS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1998-10-29 15.00 0251301 CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO 1998-10-29 796.36 0251302 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 1998-10-29 26.70 0251303 CSR AMERICA, INC. 1998-10-29 814.40 0251304 CAMPBELL, STEPHANIE 1998-10-29 41.20 November 10, 1998 4 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0251305 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 1998-10-29 199.50 0251306 CARTER, KELLY 1998-10-29 164.80 0251307 COLDWELL BANKER 1998-10-29 661.00 0251308 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO., INC. 1998-10-29 126.35 0251309 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 1998-10-29 144.00 0251310 COMRAS, MANUEL ESQ 1998-10-29 3.45 0251311 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 1998-10-29 43.68 0251312 DELTA SUPPLY CO 1998-10-29 484.16 0251313 FLORIDA DEPT OF MANAGEMENT 1998-10-29 3,093.91 0251314 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC 1998-10-29 438,586.56 0251315 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 1998-10-29 1,298.04 0251316 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 1998-10-29 761.56 0251317 DOCUMENTS INDEX, INC 1998-10-29 80.00 0251318 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 1998-10-29 1,054.06 0251319 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 1998-10-29 100.00 0251320 DOCTORS' CLINIC 1998-10-29 1,008.00 0251321 DTN CORPORATION 1998-10-29 2,088.00 0251322 DILLON, EDWARD D 1998-10-29 300.00 0251323 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 1998-10-29 150.00 0251324 E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC 1998-10-29 16.50 0251325 ESQUIRE REPORTING 1998-10-29 25.00 0251326 EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES 1998-10-29 12.74 0251327 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 1998-10-29 1,550.00 0251328 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC 1998-10-29 946.92 0251329 ECKERD DRUG CO 1998-10-29 146.00 0251330 EAST COAST CREMATION 1998-10-29 300.00 0251331 FEDEX 1998-10-29 105.50 0251332 FLORIDA BAR, THE 1998-10-29 50.00 0251333 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO 1998-10-29 55.56 0251334 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF 1998-10-29 165.00 0251335 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO 1998-10-29 886.95 0251336 FLORIDA FIRE CHIEFS 1998-10-29 50.00 0251337 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC 1998-10-29 144.00 0251338 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1998-10-29 16,341.72 0251339 FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING- 1998-10-29 45.00 0251340 FOOT -JOY DRAWER 1998-10-29 44.53 0251341 FALCON CABLE 1998-10-29 23.90 0251342 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 1998-10-29 73.62 0251343 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC 1998-10-29 615.00 0251344 FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON 1998-10-29 13.44 0251345 FLORES, JESSE 1998-10-29 137.50 0251346 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1998-10-29 25.00 0251347 FPL 1998-10-29 387.45 0251348 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT 1998-10-29 3,043.39 0251349 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 1998-10-29 129.10 0251350 FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL 1998-10-29 125.00 0251351 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC 1998-10-29 210.96 0251352 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 1998-10-29 229.07 0251353 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 1998-10-29 931.83 0251354 GALE RESEARCH, INC 1998-10-29 1,021.82 0251355 GREENE, ROBERT E 1998-10-29 1,856.77 0251356 GARD DISTRIBUTING CO 1998-10-29 630.00 0251357 GOLLNICK, PEGGY 1998-10-29 119.00 0251358 GEORGIA DEPT OF ARCHIVES & 1998-10-29 240.00 0251359 H W WILSON CO 1998-10-29 72.80 0251360 HAMMOND, KATHARINE R 1998-10-29 858.96 0251361 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 1998-10-29 1,602.09 0251362 HIGHSMITH, INC 1998-10-29 104.06 0251363 HOLIDAY BUILDERS, INC 1998-10-29 11000.00 0251364 HERITAGE BOOKS, INC 1998-10-29 479.50 0251365 HUXFORD GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY 1998-10-29 304.50 November 10, 1998 S 600K J07 FAG" Jo 600K 107 PACE 605 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0251366 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 1998-10-29 45.50 0251367 HACH COMPANY 1998-10-29 753.52 0251368 HORIZON NURSERY 1998-10-29 92.75 0251369 HOFMANN, MARGARET M 1998-10-29 60.00 0251370 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1998-10-29 15.00 0251371 HARTSFIELD, CELESTE L 1998-10-29 157.50 0251372 HASENAUER, KRIS 1998-10-29 16.50 0251373 HARBOR BRANCH ENVIRONMENTAL 1998-10-29 45,335.50 0251374 H R DIRECT 1998-10-29 96.92 0251375 HAL1, NICOLE 1998-10-29 18.03 0251376 HATHAWAY, WARRINE 1998-10-29 148.50 0251377 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1998-10-29 60,962.33 0251378 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 1998-10-29 9,960.03 0251379 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 1998-10-29 779.05 0251380 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 1998-10-29 1,574.62 0251381 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 1998-10-29 162.25 0251382 INTERSTATE BILLING SERVICE 1998-10-29 2,957.83 0251383 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 1998-10-29 158.07 0251384 INSURANCE SERVICING & 1998-10-29 11890.00 0251385 IRVINE MECHANICAL; INC 1998-10-29 583.17 0251386 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 1998-10-29 197,718.04 0251387 IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1998-10-29 702.16 0251388 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S 1998-10-29 150.00 0251389 IMI -NET, INC 1998-10-29 450.00 0251390 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1998-10-29 1,848.00 0251391 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PARKS DIV 1998-10-29 105.00 0251392 INK SPORTS INC 1998-10-29 122.39 0251393 INDIAN RIVER HAND 1998-10-29 1,502.10 0251394 JACKSON ELECTRONICS 1998-10-29 30.39 0251395 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 1998-10-29 17.14 0251396 JR REPORTING ASSOCIATES, INC 1998-10-29 214.00 0251397 JANSEN, JON G. 1998-10-29 500.00 0251398 JONES, MERRILL 1998-10-29 186.69 0251399 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 1998-10-29 4,466.00 0251400 POWELL, MARY D 1998-10-29 276.25 0251401 KOMARINETZ, ROBERT 1998-10-29 63.02 0251402 KELLY TRACTOR CO 1998-10-29 348.00 0251403 KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY FT PIERCE 1998-10-29 1,257.07 0251404 KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT 1998-10-29 183.52 0251405 KEMP, HAROLD 1998-10-29 308.92 0251406 KYLE'S RUN APARTMENTS 1998-10-29 472.00 0251407 KETCHUM MFG. C.O. INC. 1998-10-29 720.55 0251408 KRUGER, INC 1998-10-29 35,303.00 0251409 K DATA PRODUCTS, INC. 1998-10-29 1,254.64 0251410 LAQUINTA INN 1998-10-29 244.00 0251411 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC 1998-10-29 931.04 0251412 L B SMITH, INC 1998-10-29 1,063.10 0251413 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 1998-10-29 1,725.31 0251414 LFI VERO BEACH, INC 1998-10-29 7,080.90 0251415 LESCO, INC 1998-10-29 1,016.49 0251416 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC 1998-10-29 45.91 0251417 LINDSEY GARDENS APARTMENTS 1998-10-29 896.00 0251418 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 1998-10-29 393.14 0251419 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 1998-10-29 40.56 0251420 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1998-10-29 14,505.91 0251421 MICKLER'S FLORIDIANA, INC 1998-10-29 51.84 0251422 MICROFORMS MANAGEMENT CORP 1998-10-29 846.12 0251423 MILLER GOLF COMPANY 1998-10-29 136.99 0251424 MCLEOD, PETER H 1998-10-29 68.00 0251425 MATRX MEDICAL, INC 1998-10-29 1,078.70 November 10, 1998 C.1 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0251426 MCDONOUGH, DIANA 1998-10-29 122.50 0251427 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC 1998-10-29 38.07 0251428 MAYFLOWER FAMILIES 1998-10-29 153.00 0251429 MACHO PRODUCTS, INC 1998-10-29 496.92 0251430 MERCURY TECHNOLOGIES 1998-10-29 391.50 0251431 M & R SPORTSWEAR 1998-10-29 70.94 0251432 MURRAY, HELEN LMHC 1998-10-29 80.00 0251433 MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM 1998-10-29 1,505.78 0251434 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 1998-10-29 976.10 0251435 M C B COLLECTION SERVICES 1998-10-29 707.32 0251436 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 1998-10-29 200.68 0251437 MTW ROOFING CO 1998-10-29 2,930.00 0251438 MARC INDUSTRIES 1998-10-29 176.43 0251439 M W I CORPORATION 1998-10-29 575.00 0251440 MCFARLAND & COMPANY, INC 1998-10-29 56.50 0251441 MCGUIRE, GEORGE SEAN 1998-10-29 59.16 0251442 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC 1998-10-29 288.44 0251443 MONOFLO 1998-10-29 11,350.00 0251444 NEWSBANK 1998-10-29 14,213.50 0251445 NOLTE, DAVID C 1998-10-29 184,658.32 0251446 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO 1998-10-29 1,500.00 0251447 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 1998-10-29 38,870.08 0251448 N C R 1998-10-29 1,580.75 0251449 NATIONAL PROPANE CORP 1998-10-29 44.89 0251450 NU CO 2, INC 1998-10-29 67.60 0251451 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 1998-10-29 762.51 0251452 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1998-10-29 2,000.00 0251453 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 1998-10-29 6,635.52 0251454 ODYSSEY GOLF 1998-10-29 971.93 0251455 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 1998-10-29 17,661.42 0251456 OUTER SPACE PRESS 1998-10-29 20.95 0251457 O'DARE, KELLIE M 1998-10-29 28.33 0251458 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1998-10-29 0251459 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 1998-10-29 114.75 0251460 PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS 1998-10-29 506.33 480.00 0251461 PETTY CASH 1998-10-29 224.89 0251462 PHYSIO CONTROL 1998-10-29 1,075.80 0251463 PICTON PRESS 1998-10-29 490.40 0251464 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 1998-10-29 1,128.53 0251465 PRESS JOURNAL 1998-10-29 234.00 0251466 PRICE, CHARLES 1998-10-29 4,043.00 0251467 PMI IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC 1998-10-29 519.50 0251468 PRIZE POSSESSIONS 1998-10-29 668.36 0251469 PRIMARY SOURCE MEDIA 1998-10-29 824.00 0251470 PANGBURN, TERRI 1998-10-29 36.00 0251471 PRESS JOURNAL - SUBSCRIPTION 1998-10-29 117.00 0251472 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 1998-10-29 68.25 0251473 PRESS JOURNAL 1998-10-29 30.00 0251474 PROMEDIX CORP 1998-10-29 3,658.98 0251475 PERSONNEL PLUS INC 1998-10-29 732.38 0251476 POE AND BROWN INSURANCE AGENCY 1998-10-29 500.00 0251477 PALM BEACH COUNTY 1998-10-29 24.00 0251478 RUSSO PRINTING, INC 1998-10-29 35.20 0251479 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC 1998-10-29 12.75 0251480 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC 1998-10-29 618.79 0251481 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 1998-10-29 71.02 0251482 RECORDED BOOKS 1998-10-29 17.85 0251483 R & G SOD FARMS 1998-10-29 280.00 0251484 RUBBER STAID EXPRESS & MORE 1998-10-29 9.60 0251485 RAMADA INN 1998-10-29 110.00 0251486 RAWLEY, LINZEY 1998-10-29 15.45 November 10, 1998 7 BoaK i'U- "7 PnE 5O Box 107 pnE 50 i CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0251487 RIGER, JACOB M 1998-10-29 64.00 0251488 ROYAL CUP COFFEE 1998-10-29 97.50 0251489 RAPP, PAMELA 1998-10-29 12.00 0251490 RAYMOND, S A AND M J 1998-10-29 189.50 0251491 SAFETY KLEEN CORP 1998-10-29 270.00 0251492 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC 1998-10-29 119.97 0251493 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 1998-10-29 150.00 0251494 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE 1998-10-29 4,459.33 0251495 SHELL OIL COMPANY 1998-10-29 29.21 0251496 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 1998-10-29 816.35 0251497 STATE OF FLORIDA 1998-10-29 8,811.43 0251498 STATE OF FLORIDA 1998-10-29 5,297.70 0251499 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 1998-10-29 20.74 0251500 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO 1998-10-29 93.80 0251501 ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC 1998-10-29 983.47 0251502 SIMON & SCHUSTER 1998-10-29 2,764.42 0251503 JA SEXAUER INC 1998-10-29 57.20 0251504 SKAGGS, PAUL MD 1998-10-29 24.00 0251505 SHEPARD'S 1998-10-29 534.58 0251506 SCHWARZ, BERTHOLD E MD 1998-10-29 150.00 0251507 SEXTON, HILDY 1998-10-29 80.00 0251508 SELIG CHEMICAL IND 1998-10-29 775.65 0251509 SOUTH HILLS DATACOMM 1998-10-29 109.00 0251510 SOLINET 1998-10-29 429.35 0251511 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 1998-10-29 891.08 0251512 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 1998-10-29 4,520.97 0251513 SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY EQUIP 1998-10-29 507.85 0251514 SCHLITT BUILDERS, INC 1998-10-29 500.00 0251515 SARAH BRYSON INDUSTRIES 1998-10-29 400.50 0251516 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 1998-10-29 110.00 0251517 SPILLIS CANDELA & PARTNERS,INC 1998-10-29 2,500.00 0251518 STACEYS BOOK SEARCH 1998-10-29 402.50 0251519 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC 1998-10-29 444.66 0251520 SHEILDS, VANESSA 1998-10-29 33.48 0251521 SPORTS IMPORTS INC 1998-10-29 15.90 0251522 SECRETARY OF STATE 1998-10-29 20.00 0251523 SING 'N LEARN 1998-10-29 65.81 0251524 SEPPALA CORP 1998-10-29 500.00 0251525 THOMAS, DEBBY L 1998-10-29 430.50 0251526 TITLEIST DRAWER 1998-10-29 694.19 0251527 TURNER BUILDERS 1998-10-29 4,000.00 0251528 TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP 1998-10-29 295.91 0251529 T-SHIRT FACTORY 1998-10-29 101.00 0251530 TIMBERGATE BUILDERS, INC 1998-10-29 56.50 0251531 TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER 1998-10-29 1,652.28 0251532 TESNOW, RONALD L 1998-10-29 489.92 0251533 TRANS -GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE 1998-10-29 5,777.80 0251534 TRI -COUNTY CONCRETE PRODUCTS 1998-10-29 1,077.00 0251535 TABAR, JEFFREY 1998-10-29 135.40 0251536 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 1998-10-29 4,141.00 0251537 TREASURE COAST COURT 1998-10-29 50.00 0251538 THERMOGAS COMPANY 1998-10-29 15.46 0251539 TROTTA, AMERICO 1998-10-29 125.00 0251540 UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA 1998-10-29 54.65 0251541 UPSTART 1998-10-29 131.34- 0251542 U S D A RURAL HOUSING SERVICE 1998-10-29 262.00 0251543 UPTON'S PRINTING 1998-10-29 475.90 0251544 UNLIMITED SALES 1998-10-29 500.10 0251545 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 1998-10-29 4,244.40 November 10, 1998 8 0 0 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0251546 VELDE FORD, INC 1998-10-29 2,124.16 0251547 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1998-10-29 735.98 0251548 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1998-10-29 9,175.00 0251549 VILLAGE BEACH MARKET #30 1998-10-29 73.44 0251550 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1998-10-29 1,649.11 0251551 VERO FURNITURE MART, INC 1998-10-29 89.00 0251552 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1998-10-29 75.00 0251553 VERO BEARING & BOLT 1998-10-29 285.77 0251554 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 1998-10-29 25.00 0251555 VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN 1998-10-29 678.88 0251556 VAN OS, ERIC 1998-10-29 185.41 0251557 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1998-10-29 35.64 0251558 W W GRAINGER, INC 1998-10-29 174.27 0251559 WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC 1998-10-29 90.00 0251560 WILLHOFF, PATSY 1998-10-29 130.00 0251561 WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC 1998-10-29 556.40 0251562 WATERWORKS CAR WASH 1998-10-29 119.50 0251563 WHAT'S NEW IN HOME ECONOMICS 1998-10-29 33.50 0251564 WALGREENS PHARMACY 1998-10-29 511.57 0251565 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 1998-10-29 1,838.20 0251566 WASTE MANAGEMENT 1998-10-29 296,101.75 0251567 MILLER, JOSEPH 1998-10-29 643.88 0251568 STROLLO, ROCCO 1998-10-29 221.34 0251569 SIMANSKI, EDWARD 1998-10-29 111.08 0251570 BERTRAM, JAMES A 1998-10-29 52.74 0251571 ROW, ARTHUR M 1998-10-29 53.60 0251572 BOARDMAN, TIMOTHY J 1998-10-29 50.00 0251573 KWASNY, THOMAS A 1998-10-29 107.06 0251574 NORTHERN, JOHN 1998-10-29 52.57 0251575 BARTLETT, GARY R 1998-10-29 52.57 0251576 KEIZER, MICHELINA 1998-10-29 106.24 0251577 GIBBONS, JOSEPH 1998-10-29 105.04 0251578 MR FORMAL 1998-10-29 105.04 0251579 PATNODE, EDWARD 1998-10-29 54.70 0251580 EAKIN, WILLIAM & JOY 1998-10-29 55.71 0251581 FREEMAN, JOHN C 1998-10-29 55.62 0251582 FESTA, JENNIFER A 1998-10-29 53.02 0251583 COON, ROBERT L 1998-10-29 51.60 0251584 MORTON, JACQUELYN P 1998-10-29 55.12 0251585 KOTTWITZ, LISA M 1998-10-29 53.36 0251586 BAIRD, WILMA 1998-10-29 105.04 0251587 SMITH, RICHARD G 1998-10-29 105.04 0251588 BEARD, JAMES W 1998-10-29 54.25 0251589 DUBOSE, SIDNEY 1998-10-29 54.12 0251590 STIPP, LYNN C 1998-10-29 53.24 0251591 FOULKS II, RONALD H 1998-10-29 53.03 0251592 ADOLFO II 1998-10-29 5.80 November 10, 1998 0 2,351,888.98 BOOK u I FAGS 50 BOOK D 7 PACE 500 7.B. Purchase of Slide Prosector & Overhead Projector The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 2, 1998: To: Board of County Commissioners From: Alice E. White, Executive Aide Date: November 2, 1998 Subject: Purchase of Slide Projector and Overhead Projector Commissioner Ginn has recommended that the Board of County Commissioners purchase a slide projector and overhead projector for use in the conference room when outside people make presentations to the various County Committees. Recently she needed a slide projector and much time was wasted trying to locate one. Planning's projector is waiting for a new cord to arrive before it can be used, and one of Emergency Management's machines was out on loan. If approved, these projectors will remain under the control of the Board office. State contract prices are as follows: Kodak Carousel 440 Slide Projector $299.00 100-150mm 4-6" Zoom lens 75.00 3-M 9100 Overhead Projector 157.50 Total $531.50 These items were not budgeted for, therefore, if the Board agrees to the purchase, I request that the funds come from the contingency fund. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the purchase of a slide projector and an overhead projector, as requested in the Memorandum. 7. C. Progress Report and Reimbursement Invoice #3 - 1998 Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant - (Council on Aging) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 1998: November 10, 1998 10 • TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Developmen Dir r FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP S Chief, Long -Range Planning DATE: October 29, 1998 RE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PROGRESS REPORT & REIlVIBURSEIVIENT INVOICE #3 FOR THE 1998 TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING GRANT It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of November 10, 1998. It is required, as part of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant contract between the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as the Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA) and the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD), that periodic progress reports and reimbursement invoices be submitted. To comply with the CTD's requirements, staff has prepared a progress report and invoice for the period from July 1, 1998 to September 30, 1998. For the 1998 planning grant period, the invoice and progress report represent the third submittal. This progress report and applicable finished products, such as the Local Coordinating Board (LCB) meeting agenda items, CTC reports, etc., are required to accompany all reimbursement invoices. On October 29, 1998, the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB) reviewed and approved the attached progress report and invoice. At that time, the TDLCB recommended that the Board of County Commissioners, in its capacity as the Transportation Disadvantaged Program Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA), approve the attached progress report and invoice and forward these to the CTD. Attached is a copy of the progress report and invoice for the July 1, 1998 to September 30, 1998 period. Finished products such as TDLCB meeting agenda items, CTC reports, and other pertinent reports are required to accompany all reimbursement invoices. These materials will be submitted to the state along with the reimbursement invoice and the progress report. November 10, 1998 11 • BOOK A.7 PAGE 510 r, GOOK 107 PAGE 511 The BCC/DOPA's alternatives are either to approve the transmittal of the Progress Report and reimbursement invoice as submitted, to approve transmittal of the Progress Report and invoice with revisions, or to deny the transmittal of the Progress Report and reimbursement invoice to the state. Choosing the last alternative could affect the county's reimbursement of staff time expended for transportation disadvantaged planning related services. The TDLCB and the staff recommend that the Board of County Commissioners/DOPA approve Progress Report and reimbursement invoice #3, and direct staff to transmit the report and the invoice to the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD). 1. Progress Report and reimbursement invoice #3, 1998 planning grant. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the Progress Report and Reimbursement Invoice #3 and directed staff to transmit both to the State of Florida commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, as recommended in the Memorandum. COPY OF DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED 7.D. The Fairways at Grand Harbor - Final Plat Approval for a Multi -Family Residential Planned Development Requested by Fairways at Grand Harbor, LTD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 1, 1998: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator ION HEAD CONCURFLENCE: xonert M. Keating AICP Community DevglopinentlD THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director November 10, 1998 12 • FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: November 1, 1998 SUBJECT: Fairways at Grand Harbor, LTD Request for Final Plat Approval for a Multi -Family Residential Planned Development to be Known as The Fairways at Grand Harbor. It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 10, 1998. The Fairways at Grand Harbor is a 257 unit multi -family planned development on 19.11 acres. The subject site is located on the west side of Indian River Blvd. just north of Grand Harbor Boulevard. At its January 06, 1998 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners granted conceptual planned development and special exception use approval for the project. It should be noted that, as a planned development project, platting of the development site is required by the county land development regulations (LDRs). Final plat approval is required prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (C.O.) for any portion of the project. On January 22, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat/plan approval for The Fairways at Grand Harbor. All required improvements for the development are controlled by that approved plan, and are inspected and approved via the county's PD/site plan development process. Masteller & Moler, Inc., on behalf of The Fairways at Grand Harbor LTD, is now requesting final plat approval and has submitted a final plat that is in conformance with the approved preliminary PD plat/plan and the PD approval conditions tied to final plat approval. The plat creates a stormwater management tract and development tracts for the approved apartment units and site improvements (e.g.: roads, parking areas, infrastructure, and buffers). No individual building lots are proposed. In accordance with PD approval procedures, the required improvements necessary to serve individual buildings within the project are controlled via the PD/site plan development review process and will be inspected and approved on a building -by -building basis. Prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy (C.O.) for any building, the required improvements necessary to serve that building must be constructed by the developer and approved by staff. All of the required improvements in the development will be private, except certain utility improvements, which will be dedicated and warranted separately prior to the issuance of a C.O. for any building. Since the provision of required internal improvements will be controlled through the PD/site plan inspection process, and since the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat/plan and conditions tied to final plat approval, the developer has complied with the appropriate requirements to obtain final plat approval. November 10, 1998 13 • BOOK 1O � PACE,' 7 PACE 80flK _ 51,, Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final PD plat approval for The Fairways at Grand Harbor planned development. 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Final Plat Graphic ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously granted final PD plat approval for The Fairways at Grand Harbor planned development, as recommended in the Memorandum. Z.E. Lost Tree Islands - Extension of Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Cost -Share Agreement for Purchase The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 4, 1998: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. reating, AICP Community Development irecto FROM: Roland M. DeBlois,-AICP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: November 4, 1998 RE: Board Approve of Extension to the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Cost -Share Agreement for Purchase of the Lost Tree Islands It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 10, 1998. Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute the attached "Addendum IX to the Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Lost Tree Islands (FCT Project #93-001-P3A). This Addendum extends the FCT grant award expiration date for the Lost Tree Islands project to June 4, 1999. The document formalizes the FCT Governing Body's approval of county staffs request for an extension, which approval occurred at the FCT Governing Body's meeting on October 27, 1998. November 10, 1998 14 t Acquisition Status Administrative hearings on the issue of land use of the Lost Tree Islands have been completed, pending the decision of the presiding hearing officer. In the interim, settlement of issues between Lost Tree Village Corporation (LTVC) and the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), City of Vero Beach, and Town of Indian River Shores is being contemplated. The County and the FCT have a standing offer to LTVC of $5.7 million for the islands. The ultimate outcome of the land use issues will affect the islands' value, and could therefore justify reappraisals and renewal of negotiations for public purchase of all or some of the islands. The six month extension, already agreed to by the FCT, will allow an opportunity for possible reappraisals and renewal of negotiations. RECOMMRNDATiON Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute the attached agreement addendum, and authorize staff to coordinate with the Town of Indian River Shores and the City of Vero Beach for approval of the addendum by those municipalities. ATTACHMENT Addendum IX to the Conceptual Approval Agreement relating to County/State acquisition of the Lost Tree Islands. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized the chairman to execute Addendum IX to Conceptual Approval Agreement with Florida Communities Trust and authorized staff to coordinate with the Town of Indian River Shores and the City of Vero Beach for approval of the addendum by those municipalities, as recommended in the Memorandum. PARTIALLY EXECUTED COPY OF ADDENDUM ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.F. Bid Award #9021- Sebastian Water Assessment Proiect, Phase 2B - Milks Department - Treasure Coast Contracting The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 3, 1998: DATE: November 3,1998 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY CO1VIlu MONERS THRU. James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sammy" Dean, General Services FROM Free Boynton-PowdL Purchasing hfi a SUBJECT: Bid Award: IRC Bid #9021- Sebastisn water Amt Project, Phase 2B Utilitity Services November 10, 1998 15 • BOOK 10 PAGE jib k Fr 60u 10.7 PAGE U5 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Bid Opening Date: Oct. 27,1998 Advatising Dates: Sept. 29, & Oct 06, 1999 Specifications Mailed to. Thirty - Nine (39) Vendors Replies: Six (6) Vendors "No Bid" Response: None vtivTOTAL AMOUNT OF B Treasure Coast Contracting 51,171,328.10 Vero Beach, Fl Driveways Inc. 51,393,780.05 Titusville, Fl Felix Equities Inc. $1,299,999.00 Coral Springs, Fl Sheltra & Sons Construction $1,376,064.30 Indiantown, Fl Foster Marine Cont, Inc. $1,441,152.00 Pompano Beach, Fl W. Jackson dt Sons, Inc. $1,482,817.00 Pompano Beach, Fl SOURCE OF FUNDS Work In Progress - Sebastian Phase II B 475-000-169-348-00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED BUDGET $1,424,712.68 RECONIlI�IDATION Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Treasure Coast Contracting, as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid (See Department Memo.) In addition, staff requests authorization for the Chairman to cmutee the attached sample contract document upon review and approval as to form by the County Attorney. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #9021 to Treasure Coast Contracting and authorized the Chairman to execute the contract document upon review and approval as to form by the County Attorney, as recommended in the Memorandum. November 10, 1998 CONTRACT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD 16 7. G. &uipment Declared Surplus,for Sale or Disposal Moved to and heard with item I LGA 7.H. Use of Courthouse - Christmas in Downtown 1998 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1998: Date: October 30, 1998 To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: James E. Chandler County Administrator From: H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director Department of General Services Subject: Request to Use Courthouse BACKGROUND: Since 1996, the Downtown Vero Beach Association has been approved by the Board to use the Courthouse for "Christmas in Downtown". pat Brown, Chairman of this event has requested use of that facility again for "Christmas in Downtown 1998" to be held on Sunday, December 6, 1998. The Board established certain criteria that must be met in order for the Counthouse Building to be used for outside events. Staff has discussed the policies with Ms. Brown with the following results. 1. Security - Ms. Brown talked with Sheriff Wheeler and he has agreed to famish the required security. 2. Cleaning - Staff estimates cost to provide personnel to open the building and perform necessary cleaning services to cost approximately $100.00. Ms. Brown has requested these costs be absorbed by the County. 3. Ms. Brown has agreed to execute all required paperwork to effect the use of the building. In summary, Ms. Brown has made two requests of the Board One is use of the Courthouse Building for Christmas in Downtown activity and two, County to absorb all cost associated with use of the facility. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of the two requests provided there is no unusual clean-up or damage to the facilities at the Courthouse. Should this occur, it is recommended that expenses related in these two categories be billed directly back to the Downtown Vero Beach Association November 10, 1998 17 BOOK 10 7 FATE e� Ii OOK 107 PAGE 51 4 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved use of the Courthouse Building for Christmas in Downtown and approved absorbing all costs associated with use of the facility, provided there is no unusual clean-up or damage, as recommended in the Memorandum. Should any unusual clean- up or damage occur, the related expenses shall be billed directly to the Downtown Vero Beach Association. 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 8.A. Tax Collector's Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1998: OCT 3 01998 EC ; Y `.� • - V V SII IYII`•�„yl �l�' October 30, 1998 KARL ZIMMERMANN, C.F.C.- Tar Collector 'r1:RT1r1Uj) FLORIDA Q)1.1 ti. I OR d -'A Honorable John Tippin Chairman, Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Mr. Tippin: nlmlN Commissionem �fl'liRI9�� PumnAtbornay ---_ fel — PUMIa Waft Community Dev. values Ani IM EmwS. Sork Risk I am enclosing the 1998 (Unused) Fee Report of the Indian River County Tax Collector's office. Total income for fees from all sources for 1998 was $3,360,149.64; total expenditures were $2,047,991.64; and the unused fees were $1.312,158.00. Comparable figures for 1997 were, total Income from all sources $3,433,819.34; total expenditures were $1,655,654.37; producing unused fees of $1,778,164.97. November 10, 1998 18 • If you have any questions, please contact me. KZ/ms Enclosure P.U. 601 1509 • VIM lit". fl. 32961 hto-w- ( 561) 56'4WW • P.m. ( 561) "0-5009 SianMS11i-1"AR ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted the Tax Collector's Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98. 8.B. Sheriff s Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1998: 6Fjeriff 4055 41 st AVENUE October 30, 1998 GARY C. WHEELER e INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFr'S ^,i'3^CIA,-ON -MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFF3 ASorC:A;'C'i VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960-1808 The Honorable John Tippin, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394 Dear Mr. Tippin: DISTRIBUTION LIST Commissioners Administrator Attorney Personnel Public Works Commmity Dev. utiiities Finance OMe Emerg. Serv. Risk Mgt. Other Attached is check number 27488 in the amount of S 314,811.83, which represents funds due to the Board of County Commissioners as detailed November 10, 1998 19 • (561) 569-6700 BOOK 107 PAGE e.A BOOK �lJ PAGE. Fund 016, General Fund Reversion S 3,709.30 Fund 112, Special Law Enforcement 4.38 Out of County Prisoner Revenue 165,055.00 Fines & Forfeitures 4,525.00 Interest Income 138,849.71 Misc. Revenue (Tires) 163.35 General Fund (Civil Process Service) 1,755.60 Prior Year Refund (Insurance Claim) 749.49 S 314, 811.83 If you have any questions or any further information is required, please contact our Comptroller at 569-6700, ext 406. Sincerely, C � Gary .Wheeler, Sheriff - GCW:mej OCT � U i593 cc: Joseph A. Baird, Budget Director Ed Fry, Finance Director Richard Dees 41 The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcementency Agency lffil �+ mk %ccredited by the Commission on :accreditation for Law Enforcement agencies. Incorporated 0 - ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved acceptance of the Sheriff's Financial Report for FY ending 9/30/98. 8.C. Property Appraiser's Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 27, 1998: David C. Nolte, ASA WE ARE HERE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER TO SERVE YOU! ' October 27, 1998 Hon. John Tippin Board of County Commissioners 1840 25" Street Vero Beach, F132960 November 10, 1998 20 • 1840 25TH STREET VERO BEACH, FL 32960 (561)567-8000x469 SuN-Coy 224-1469 FAX (561) 7704087 E -mai: Prop-aPPraissr QindWn-rkW-fLu8 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS FLORIDA CHAPTER (AAO w►0 MEMBER OF THE YEAR 1989 AMERICAN SOCIE1y OF APPRAISERS PROFESSIONAL APPRAISERS MOCIATION OF FLORIDA 'LORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PROPERTY APPRAISERS r , U Dr. John, Enclosed please find a copy of our annual report for the year ending September 30, 1998. Sincerely, David C. Nolte, Property Appraiser DCN/ds OCT 2 8 1998 CoMmLwoners AdminisvWr ��• Attorney Parscnnel Public Wordts commurity L`ev Utilhies Flnence OM8 Em. or-. 8arv. Rislc t�,gt. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted the Property Appraiser's Financial Report for FY ending 9/30/98. 8.D. Supervisor of Elections' Financial Report for FY Ending 9/30/98 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1998: Kay Clew Supervisor of Elections Indian River County. Florida October 30, 1998 Honorable John Tipp`n, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 November 10, 1998 21 BOOK 107 PAGE irq ty BOOK D7 PAGE 521 Dear Chairman Tippen: Attached are the financial reports which I am required to file with the Board of County Commissioners by October 31, 1998. Enclosed is check #3929 in the amount of $33,941.51 which includes income derived from lists and labels in the amount of $28,275.03, interest income in the amount of $3,319.46, and excess revenues in the amount of $2,347.02, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. Please advise if you have any questions or require additional information. ��,'..,,�� Sincerely, ca a��: � rte- Kay In cc: Honorable Jeff Barton, Clerk of Court Mr. Joe Baird, Budget Director r KCjl.-•.fes ..r Enclosures 1M-40 25th Street. Suite N- t09 • Vero Beach, FL 32960.3396 . (561) 56-8187 • FAX (561) 770-5367 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted the Supervisor of Elections' Financial Report for FY ending 9/30/98. November 10, 1998 22 0 0 9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 98-122 - ABANDONMENT OF PORTIONS OF 10TH STREET BETWEEN37TH AVENUE & 41ST AVENUE (LEGISLATIVE) Puss-joumm Published Dally Vero Beach, Indian River Coto", Florida 140A NMI IN COUNTY CF WDIAN RIVER: STATE OF ROMA Eiefare the undersigned authority posonaly appeared Derryi K How who an oath says that he n President of the press Journal, a d* newspaper pub at Vero Beach n Ydian Rhnar Canty. Florida; the the attached copy of advolsemeM beteg a hi6 'a in the matter of In the /� ��L� * fi Court, was pb- Yshed n said n the issues of F+t•w tl�s.rs%a %%• 1991 Affiant to do says that the said Press,louniet is a newspaper pub19W at Vero Elea* In saki 1arr River County, Florida, and that the said y has Itaretofare been ado w seas class malto at the post oftbe Beads, in sold In len FBver f�ounty, Florida, for a period of one year rod preceding the first pubilcaiion of the of idw copy of �airy discount, rebate �oo�mmato lssiii or ohm tor ft purpose ofsecuanig oft st for pubscaUon in said newspaper. W---. MLILK0.0111M (SEAL) fb�•: of Florlde . JWL 01. 20D1 for Produced ID O Type of ID Produced 19 go NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING Notice of hearing to consider a Petition for the dosing, abandon. ment, and vacation of a portion of 10th Sheet, between 37th Avenue and 41 st Avenue. Said lands lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: A 35' x 1,300' segment of 10th Sheet right-of-way lying between 37th Avenue and 41 st Avenue, Malaluka Gardens subdivision as. recorded in Plat Book 4, page 10 of the public records of Indian River County, Florida. A public hearing at which par- ties in interest and cftena shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by the Board of Canty Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Chambers of the.County Administration Building, located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, November 10, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be t made at this meeting will treed to enswe that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which Includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. . ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPE.' CIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN! ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY -s -John W. Tippin, Chairman Oct. 24,1998 1504718r Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of November 2, 1998 with the aid of an aerial photo of the area on the ELMO: November 10, 1998 23 07 pn TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D SION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Keating, AIC Community Development Director A .A - THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director, Current Development FROM: John McCoy, AICP �� V\ Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: November 2, 1998 SUBJECT: Request For Abandonment of Portions of 10t° Street Between 37`h Avenue and 41" Avenue It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 10, 1998. A petition has been submitted to abandon segments of 10" Street between 3r and 4111 Avenues. The right-of-way segments are located between a portion of Malaluka Gardens (platted in 1955) and the newly platted Laurel's Subdivision (see attachment #2). Both developments and the adjacent area are zoned for and developed as single-family lots. The subject right-of-way segments are 35' wide "half -street" right-of-way segments and are located immediately south of Malaluka Gardens lots. This right-of-way abandonment request evolved during the recent, review and approval of the Laurels Subdivision phases III and IV final plat. Since the subject portions of 101 Street do not provide the sole direct access to any adjacent lots, do not provide access to the Laurels Subdivision, are substandard in width and are unpaved, these segments are candidates for abandonment. The referenced segments of 10'h Street right-of-way were created and "constructed" as an unpaved half -street in 1955 via approval of the Malaluka Gardens plat and corresponding development. Though the plat, a 35' wide half street right-of-way was established between 37th and 43nd Avenues. The unpaved roadway was dedicated to and is maintained by the county. East of 37t1 Avenue, 10t, Street is a full street and is used by area residents, with some residents directly accessing 10`h Street from their driveways. Presently, the subject portion of 10' Street functions as an unpaved east/west local road. Staff has been contacted by local residents who have expressed both opposition and support for the proposed abandonment. Located to the south of and contiguous to l0U' Street, the Laurels Subdivision was originally approved to connect to 101 Street, provide 25' of right-of-way to convert the subject segment of 10th Street from a half -street to a full street, and pave 10t1 Street from 37th Avenue to the subdivision's November 10, 1998 24 0 40 proposed access point onto 101 Street Contrary to staffs recommendation, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a preliminary plat modification deleting the originally proposed connection to 10th Street Subsequently, the County Attorney's Office determined that, because the Laurels Subdivision would not connect to 10th Street, the developer would no longer benefit from 10th Street and could no longer be required to dedicate 10th Street right-of-way without compensation or to provide for any paving of 10th Street Therefore, the Laurels Subdivision Phases III and IV final plat was approved without any 10" Street right-of-way dedication and without any 10th Street paving requirements. During construction of The Laurels, a small berm was built along the north property line of The Laurels, where it abuts the 10th Street right-of-way. The berm appears to encroach slightly into the 10th Street right-of-way and slightly narrows the historical travelway, although the travelway still accommodates two-way traffic. The berm location and 10th Street travelway have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department In summary, with the approval and construction of The Laurels, the subject segment of 10* Street will remain a 35' wide, unpaved half street right-of- way if not abandoned. In any right-of-way abandonment analysis, it is important to consider the characteristics of the road to be abandoned. In this case, segments of 10th Street right-of-way between 37th Avenue and 41st Avenue have a low volume of local traffic. In addition, there are alternative roadway segments located conveniently nearby to accommodate diverted trips. Please see attachment #2 which depicts the segments for abandonment If the subject segments of 10th Street are abandoned, local area motorists needing to go east or west could use the adjacent 11th or 12th Streets. Eastbound traffic on 10th Street would be diverted north on 41st Avenue, while westbound traffic on 10th Street could go north or south on 371 Avenue. Thirty-eighth, 39th and 40th Avenues will essentially become cul-de-sacs between 10th and 11th Streets. All traffic leaving these streets would go north to 11th Street or 12th Street Residents with driveways on 1011 Street will still be able to use those driveways, since the portion of 10th Street to be abandoned is adjacent to their lots and after abandonment will become part of their lots. Effect of Abandonment The abandonment would eliminate the need for continued road grading of the abandoned segments and any future paving expenses associated with paving these segments of 10th Street Also, the abandonment would eliminate a permanent half -street that cannot be made whole. If the request is approved, adjacent property owners could grass the abandoned segments of right-of-way adjacent to their homes or use the existing travelway for private driveway purposes. The adjacent property owners would also benefit from an expanded building envelope, although they would not be allowed to build within the abandoned right-of-way area because an easement would be retained over the abandoned segments (as described below). These property owners could also locate fences within this abandoned right-of-way subject to approval of a covenant for removal of the structure. Proposed Drainage and Utility Easements and Improvements Per guidelines established by the Board of County Commissioners, this petition has been reviewed by all county divisions and utility providers having potential interest in the right-of-way. While all departments and utility providers have recommended approval, several have conditioned the approval upon the county retaining a drainage and utility easement over all abandoned segments. Also, it should be noted that, as proposed, Emergency Services will continue to have access to an emergency access point at the north end of The Laurels near 39th Avenue. The drainage and utility easement conditions are accommodated by the request November 10, 1998 25 BOOKJ07P 1 ,flux 107 'b Please see attachment #2 which depicts the access conditions that will exist if the proposed abandonment is approved If the request is approved, there would be an unpaved T turn around at the south end of 401 Avenue. An extended paved "T" turn around will be provided by Public Works at the south end of 39* Avenue, with the paved extension to the west providing paved access to the emergency access point located at the north end of The Laurels. A paved "T" turnaround will also be provided at the south end of 381" Avenue. Conclusion The subject right-of-way is not part of the roadway system as noted on the County's thoroughfare plan and is not needed for the thoroughfare plan system. The abandonment would not eliminate access to any properties, and local traffic could use other existing, nearby streets in the neighborhood if the right-of-way is abandoned Additionally, the abandonment would eliminate a permanent half - street and expenses for road grading and/or future paving. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the attached abandonment resolution for legal form and sufficiency. Therefore, in staffs opinion the proposed abandonment is warranted. Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners abandon its rights to the subject 10* Street right-of-way segments and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached abandonment resolution, with the following condition: 1. That over all segments of the right-of-way to be abandoned a drainage and utility easement shall be reserved 1. Location Map 2. Sketch of Survey 3. Resolution Director Boling responded to concerns of the Commissioners regarding responsibilities for future maintenance of the property and paving the turn -around T's The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Ann Gaskell, 1025 30 Avenue, spoke at length against the abandonment and cited various concerns, such as regular use of the one-way street by some residents of Malaluka Gardens; creation of a hazard for emergency vehicles; and creation of an impediment to FPL access. She complained that since August, 10' Street had been narrowed considerably due to installation of a berm and suggested it be removed. She asked three questions: 1) Why the street area portions are being abandoned and closed off. 2) Who decided to go ahead with this proposed abandonment. 3) Was a survey completed regarding the vehicles which use the street and the results. November 10, 1998 26 Director Boling advised that the decision was made by the Planning and Zoning Commission when they gave consideration to the Laurels development plans for not paving and not dedicating their half of the roadway. Utility providers had been contacted and there were no objections. Commissioner Adams asked, and Director Boling gave a comprehensive response as to the public purpose for abandonment of this road saying it was unlikely that this one-way street would ever be brought up to standards and, in staff's opinion, abandonment in this instance, with the provisions, was a feasible option. Vice Chairman Macht likened this abandonment to the tail wagging the dog and in his experience in the county, a half of a road is better than no road at all. He wondered how this policy evolved and how the County has become hasty to abandon these half roads. Public Works Director James Davis advised that unpaved one -lane roads exist throughout the county particularly 1/4 mile from each sub -lateral canal. He explained how the county was originally laid -out in the 1920's. The result was that even numbered streets, such as 10' Street, 6' Street, 2"d Street, throughout the county, have a lh right-of-way platted on the old plats. At a roads' workshop, conducted in 1981, it was decided that as new development came along on these tract lands, the new development would dedicate the other 1/Z of the right-of-way and share in the cost of paving half of the road. In many instances, the new developments do not want to connect to the local streets, preferring to have a more exclusive community only connecting to the collector and arterial roads. When they do not donate the other half of the right-of-way and pay half the cost of paving, then the other half becomes incomplete and there is not enough space to pave to allow for run-off and other road paving requirements. He mentioned that this neighborhood does have l I' Street, just 600 feet away, which accommodates local traffic and maintains the grid system. Director Davis advised that the public purpose is that it saves the County the cost of a higher share in the paying of the costs, as only one side of the street would be subject to assessment for paving because they would be the only ones to receive a benefit. The other public purposes would be that the less impervious surface you have, the less stormwater run- offyou have and the drainage in the whole area could be enhanced by removing the road and widening the swale. There are some existing drainage difficulties and staff feels they can get better drainage by eliminating the road. Director Davis added that utilities would still have easements to access their utility lines and the abandoned right-of-way would retain a utility and drainage easement, which November 10, 1998 27 BOOK 107 PnE.596 600K 10.7 PA, JE 519.07 would give more room for the utilities to exist and there would be no problem in accessing utilities. Emergency services would still have their emergency connection to the north -south street and should not be a problem. Ms. Gaskell asked about taking the berm out, and Director Davis responded that the berm is on the Laurels' property and the road had encroached on their property. The berm was designed and a landscape buffer exists now between the two subdivisions. Director Davis also spoke at length in response to Ms. Gaskell's concerns about the drainage problems in the area. David Pittman, 3806 10' Street, spoke in support of abandoning the roadway. His driveway faces 10`h Street and he sees cars speeding at night 60-70 mph and views it as a dangerous situation. Tammy Combs, 1005 37' Avenue, spoke in favor of abandonment saying that she had seen teenagers speeding around the corner and had grave concerns for the safety of her young children. C.J. Hayes, lives on 40' Avenue, spoke against abandonment from his perspective as a former fireman and paramedic. He believed it would be very difficult for the large fire trucks and ambulances to back up and to turn there. Jerry Doutrich, 1006 39'h Avenue, spoke in favor of abandonment because of small children in the area and other safety factor concerns. He stated that cars are cutting across his property now because the road was narrower because of the berm. Richard Conyan, 1006 3r Avenue, advised that he sees cars speeding and doing "donuts" in the new development, that 50+ mph is common. He had concerns for children in the neighborhood. Scott Nuttall, building at 3822 9' Lane, also had concerns about safety and supported the closing of the road and abandonment of the property. Mr. Hayes mentioned the emergency access between Malaluka Gardens and the Laurels and wondered how other vehicles would be kept from going through it. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, to approve staff's recommendation. November 10, 1998 28 Under discussion, Commissioner Ginn recalled when the Laurels came to the Board of County Commissioners for approval of the idea and that 391' Avenue would not have to go through. She was concerned about having a policy to maintain the grid system in the future and thought that perhaps we need to be a little more forceful with developers. Commissioner Adams was concerned that the abandonment would be setting a precedent because there are an incredible number of half streets in the county. If the problem to be solved is speeding traffic, then there is an enforcement problem. If the County closed every road with an enforcement problem, there would not be very much left open. She also felt there was a need for a traffic count on that street before making a decision. Commissioner Eggert believed this was not the first half road that has been abandoned, that it is not a new precedent that was being set. She did not believe it was a big thing to close this half road. She also felt that if developers came in with a traditional neighborhood design, they would not necessarily go out of that subdivision. Commissioner Adams reminded them that once the street is closed, it becomes part of someone's yard and not open to the public for walking dogs and so forth. Vice Chairman Macht agreed with Commissioner Ginn's suggestion to look at the County's policy on roads and perhaps look at them differently and be more reluctant to close them. County Attorney Vitunac advised that it is an option to close the road to motor vehicles and keep it as an easement for walking or biking, if they would like to do that. Chairman Tippin did not think abandoning this half road would set a precedent, but also believed that a workshop on this would be beneficial since this problem exists all over the county and as more growth comes about, it will continue to be a problem. Community Development Director Bob Keating advised that staff has a proposed policy to bring to the Board of County Commissioners as an amendment to the County's land development regulations, which says that a developer can take the option of not taking his development to a half street, acknowledging that he will receive a benefit, but choosing not to accept that benefit. What happened here, he explained, was a combination of a policy decision (made by the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow a modification of a subdivision, which staff recommended against) and a legal determination (because the subdivision did not have access on 10' Street, the County could no longer require the developer to dedicate the right-of-way and participate with the paving). He felt the policy November 10, 1998 ►� -BOUT a 23 would address the legal issue that put the County in this position in this instance. Commissioner Adams was not sure she liked the policy, but did like the County Attorney's idea. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried 3-2 (Commissioners Adams and Macht opposed). (Resolution No. 98-122 adopted providing for the closing, abandonment, vacation, and discontinuance of a segment of 10' Street between 37h Street and 41' Street, and reserving a drainage and utility easement over the abandoned right-of-way said land lying in Indian River, County, Florida.) CLERK'S NOTE: This resolution will be replaced with one that has been corrected to read "10' Street between 37' Avenue and 41' Avenue" RESOLUTION NO. 98- 12 2 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING, ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF A SEGMENT OF 10TH STREET BETWEEN 37TH STREET AND 41sT STREET, AND RESERVING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THE ABANDONED RIGHT- OF-WAY SAID LAND LYING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, on August 19, 1998 Indian River County received a duly executed and documented petition, requesting that the County close, vacate, abandon, discontinue, renounce and disclaim any right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to a portion of 101 Street between 371h and 41s' Avenue, said lands lying in Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes 336.10, notice of a public hearing to consider said petition was duly published; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting documents, staff investigation and report, and testimony of all those interested and present, the board finds that the subject right-of-way is not a state or federal highway, nor located within any municipality, nor is said right-of-way necessary for continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, nor access to any given private property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. All right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to that certain right-of-way being known more particularly as: (See Exhibit "A" for legal description.) Lying in Indian River County, Florida. is hereby forever closed, abandoned, vacated, discontinued, renounced and disclaimed, except for a drainage and utility easement which is hereby reserved over the entire abandoned right- of-way. November 10, 1998 30 2. The closing, vacation, abandonment, discontinuance and disclaimer of this public right-of- way is in the best interests of the public. 3. Notice of the adopting of this resolution shall be forthwith published once within thirty (30) days from the date of adoption hereof, and 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution together with the proofs of publication required by Florida Statutes 336.10 in the Official Record Books of Indian River County without undue delay. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commission F g g e r t who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner G i n n , and upon being put to a vote. the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht N a y Commissioner Fran B. Adams N a y Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert A y e Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A y e The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 10 day of November 1998. ATTEST: ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk State of Florida Count Indian River' y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIANm .COUNTY, F�L RIDA ) r BY: , .'-L ' An W. Tippin, C Board of County Commissioners / kr . I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared JOHN W. TIPPIN, and JEFFREY K. BARTON, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my band and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this /D day of . A.D., 1998. otary Public APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY d1?JJJI.iRM1VJJAh/JJilJ!!IJ!!lJIJJIJIJlJJJ7J.'!.' { .►er nos Reta M. Smith N Public, Stan of Florida i o Commission No. CC 582439 n -Eor rce My Cottltltiuion up. 09'M2000 i BY:L�`C �w/ j{ ` -y 1•BOa•3•NO:AItY - Fly. Maury Swite k Bovdma Co. < William G. Collins, a »,•,r.,�r>»»»v,a�»�».a•...v»»» <. Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS BY: ' Robert M. Keating, AICP, Directo Community Development Division u\clj\res98-35 November 10, 1998 31 BOOK 107 FAGE ej'34'G m s f W41 W 13.8' BLOCK C THE LAURELS 'K BLOCK D ( `' BLOCK E L4'f 70' 1 J IL" 20' Emergency Access do Utility Easement Lot I i Stormwater 99 1 Tract SUBDMSION — PHASE N Scale. N.T.S. wR 4.3y 41C� i�s m I BLOCK F16.1 .1 `' LEGAL DESCRIPTION According to the plot of Molaluka Gardens recorded in Plot Book 4, Page 10 of the Public Records of Indian River County, the following portions of Marines Road (10th Street): 300 feet lying South of Block C per plat; The West 205.4 feet, more or less, lying South of Block D per plat, the East line of which is to be the extension Northerly of the East line of Lot 99 in the Laurels Subdivision—Phase IV, the plot of which is recorded in Plot Book 15, Page 42 of the Public Records of Indian River County; 250 feet lying South of Block E per plat; 250 feet lying South of Block F per plot. All lying in Indian River County, Florida. W 01 1 {a i 0 0 a CERTIFICATION o I, Charles A. Cromer. hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to W y pp practice in the state of Florida. that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code. 5 pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY i (�Z / SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION :5;7 �PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 9 Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 160:f a rd N M • W c� y C C3 Q.-1 �I --I I I 1 m s f W41 W 13.8' BLOCK C THE LAURELS 'K BLOCK D ( `' BLOCK E L4'f 70' 1 J IL" 20' Emergency Access do Utility Easement Lot I i Stormwater 99 1 Tract SUBDMSION — PHASE N Scale. N.T.S. wR 4.3y 41C� i�s m I BLOCK F16.1 .1 `' LEGAL DESCRIPTION According to the plot of Molaluka Gardens recorded in Plot Book 4, Page 10 of the Public Records of Indian River County, the following portions of Marines Road (10th Street): 300 feet lying South of Block C per plat; The West 205.4 feet, more or less, lying South of Block D per plat, the East line of which is to be the extension Northerly of the East line of Lot 99 in the Laurels Subdivision—Phase IV, the plot of which is recorded in Plot Book 15, Page 42 of the Public Records of Indian River County; 250 feet lying South of Block E per plat; 250 feet lying South of Block F per plot. All lying in Indian River County, Florida. W 01 1 {a i 0 0 a CERTIFICATION o I, Charles A. Cromer. hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to W y pp practice in the state of Florida. that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code. 5 pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY i (�Z / SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION :5;7 �PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 9 Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 160:f a rd N M • 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PURCHASE OF THE NORTH SEBASTIAN C.A. ADDITION (AMISTAD ANSTALT) PROPERTY UNDER THE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS PROGRAM PUSWOURNM Published Dally Vero Beach, fndWn River CowW, Florldo COUNTY OF INDIAN RM: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the hrhdersigrrod• ad hm* personally appeared Darts K. Hides who an I' WW RW Florida, to Is 00 the at copy of edit, be pi at Vero B�dr - W_ Alma P-1 P I W 1-1 Inthe Car% was pub- lished in said newspaper In the issues of Affiant further says #0 the said Press.lorrnst is a newspaper putrRsthed at Vero Beady, in said Indian Film County. Florida, and that man has heretofore been �dass mall rtrotterb atwme post ftinn Vo Beath, an aftCAunty, Fbrida� f« a period of one year next preoerirrg the first Pld*M ion of the attached copy of adverdsemsnt: and affiant further says that he has nOw paid nor pranrsed any person, firm « carper tion any dlscmM rabate, aamdssion « refund the propose of sacuYg t his •�advmum, •ahent f« prrberwtbn insaid rhawspaper. f,;trh'fdtsrl�jhwbed before rtw,i�ts�� day D.18_.1—_ tar M 01. �� /� 2 COW1 N0.((611099 . C: h7A/!!i�(x Ji a :4otary Public, State of Florida °.,•ELIC, SSA,.•' qty Commission Exp Jan. 01 2001 ••«..•••• Comm. No. CC 611 Personalty Known Wor Produced ID 0 . i3 of ID Produced ., R �Addit r f arsusnw NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Notice of meeting to consider county purchase of androruanrto 11 significant. properly:..under '!M county environmental lards pro- gram. The subject +-19 acre prop• arty is presently owned by AmWad Anst ft, and is located earth of Sebastian City Hall, west of the F. E. C. Raibaad and contiguous to the North Sebastian Corrurvation Mao, to Section 30, Fining Groat. See the above map far the location. Hes In Interest and dHzars shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by the Board of .candy Commissioners .of. Indian River County, Florida, in the Canny Commission Chambers of tiro Comity Administration Building, located at 1640 25th' Street. Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, November 10, 1998 at 9.05 am. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbollm record of the proceedings Is made, which Includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is basad ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPE. CULL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT; THE COUNTY'S 'AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X223 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY -s -John W. Tippin, Chairman October 10,.1948 - _.1464154r Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement Chief Roland M. DeBlois reviewed a Memorandum of November 3, 1998: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Keating, AICD Community Development D e FROM: Roland M. DeBloisCP Chief, Environmental Planning November 10, 1998 33 807 900K 10.7 PAGE 153' BOOK 107 PAGE b,3 DATE: November 3, 1998 SUBJECT: Approval of County Purchase of the North Sebastian C.A. Addition (Anstalt) Property under the County Environmental Lands Program It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 10, 1998. SUAMABY Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners purchase the "North Sebastian Conservation Area (CA) Addition" (Anstalt) property with land acquisition bond funds. The proposed purchase option contract (already executed by the seller) is summarized as follows: Por hater Indian River County Board of County Commissioners / Florida Communities Trust (County will hold title) Roller Amistad Anstalt (a Liechtenstein Corporation) c/o R. Mason Blake Cost chars; Florida Communities Trust (50016) (includes share of acquisition costs) Total Price $76,000 (±$4,000 per acre) other Costa: ±$15,000 (appraisal, survey, environ. audit, management plan update, consultant hours) County Bonda F.:penditure• ±$45,500 Arreao : ±19 acres (±18 acres xeric sand pine scrub, ±1 acre wetland) LAAC Recommend2flon: The Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAO), at its meeting of September 30, 1998, voted unanimously (11 to 0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve purchase of the subject Anstalt property- Closing reppy Closing subject to County Commission approval; County will purchase tract and apply for cost -share reimbursement from the FCT as a boundary amendment to the St. Sebastian PUD FCT cost -share agreement. The subject ±19 acre North Sebastian C.A. Addition is the last remaining parcel proposed for acquisition in the North Sebastian Conservation Area, north of Sebastian City Hall. The subject property is bordered on three sides by public conservation land (the St. Sebastian PUD and AGC Industrial tracts). The North Sebastian C.A. Addition is currently ranked 8th on the LAAC site acquisition list. The proposed addition would expand the existing ±388 acre North Sebastian Conservation Area to ±407 acres. The subject property is listed under "anticipated activity" on the "LAAC Projects Costs/Revenues Report" presented to the Board on May 12, 1998, and county bond fimds are available for the purchase under the first series $15 million bond issuance. The County Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC), at its meeting on September 30, 1998, voted unanimously to recommend that the Board approve the purchase contract, subject to the County applying for after -the -fact 50% cost -share reimbursement through the Florida Communities Trust program (see attached LAAC meeting minutes excerpt). November 10, 1998 34 This public hearing has been advertised +30 days in advance to fulfill a State statute requirement that the County hold a public meeting after having provided at least 30 days advertised public notice to formally consider approving and exercising its purchase option for the Anstalt property. The State requirement that the Board hold a public meeting to consider exercising its option after having provided 30 days advertised notice of the meeting applies because the County chose to keep its appraisal of the subject property confidential until the seller executed a binding option contract. Once that option contract had been signed, the appraisal was released and has been available to the public during the 30 day period prior to the advertised public meeting. Besides meeting State statute requirements, the hearing on the Anstalt property will serve to meet a Land Acquisition Guide requirement that the County hold a public hearing prior to purchasing any property with land acquisition bond funds. The subject 19 acre property consists of ±18 acres of mature sand pine scrub, and approximately one acre of freshwater wetland. The property is currently zoned RM -6, Multi -family Residential, up to 6 units per acre. Its Future Land Use Designation is L-2, Low Density Residential, up to 6 units per acre. The property is an "enclave" of unincorporated county surrounded by land within the City of Sebastian. Although undeveloped County right-of-way for Gibson Street (130th Street)terminates at the northwestern comer of the property, the property is currently landlocked. As previously mentioned, the property borders public conservation land on three sides. The fourth side (to the east) borders Florida East Coast Railroad right-of- way- Ownership ight-of- way. Owners ip Characteristics Currently, the owner of the property is Amistad Anstalt (a Liechtenstein corporation). Public records indicate that the current tax assessed value for the tract is $84,310. Acquisition Cost -Share & Property Manag m n Two issues which are important to staff with respect to all proposed purchases are obtaining cost share assistance in property acquisition and addressing management costs. • Cost -Share Florida Communities Trust staff has indicated to county staff that the subject property is eligible for FCT funding as a boundary amendment to the existing St. Sebastian PUD FCT project. County staff is in the process of submitting a boundary amendment application to the FCT. Staff anticipates that the amendment will be approved, and that FCT 50% cost -share funding will be forthcoming. Since the St. Sebastian PUD FCT project was an after -the -fact reimbursement agreement, the County has the opportunity to purchase the Anstalt tract on its own and obtain after -the -fact FCT cost -share funding. County staff's position is that the County should remain flexible to close the purchase on its own and obtain after -the -fact cost -share reimbursement, in the event that timing does not allow a joint County/FCT closing by the option expiration date of December 1, 1998. • Management If acquired, the subject property will be incorporated as part of the North Sebastian Conservation Area and managed by the County. It is anticipated that purchase of this addition will not significantly increase management costs that the County already plans to incur in managing the overall North Sebastian Conservation Area. (See the attached management cost projection table from the North Sebastian Conservation Area Management Plan.) The County has hired a consultant (Smith Environmental Services) to develop a Sebastian area -wide scrub - jay habitat conservation plan (HCP), expected to be completed by the end of this calendar year. The Anstalt property will add to the pool of public conservation land available to mitigate the release of scrub lots for development in the Sebastian Highlands. Management of the subject property to convert it to scrub -jay habitat will consist of thinning the mature sand pines in combination with follow-up prescribed bum(s). This November 10, 1998 35 BOOK J07 PAGE �u BOOK 107 PAGE 535 technique is in process at the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area, whereby mature sand pines were harvested by Georgia-Pacific under contract with the County. A follow-up prescribed burn on the Wabasso Scrub property is planned. Under the Wabasso Scrub -Georgia Pacific contract, the County actually received revenue (±$8,000) from the paper company for fulfilling a resource management need. A similar arrangement is anticipated for the Anstalt property and sand pine scrub areas of the overall North Sebastian Conservation Area. In accordance with County Land Acquisition Guide, an independent appraisal was obtained to determine an approved appraised value of the property. In accordance with County and State procedures, since the property's worth is less than $500,000, only one appraisal (instead of two) was obtained. The appraisal firm selected was Armfield-Wagner Appraisal & Research, Inc. The Armfield-Wagner appraised value is $90,000. The negotiated purchase price of $76,000 is ±841/o of the approved appraised value. In coming to terms with county staff on the negotiated purchase price (subject to County Commission approval), the seller has executed a standard FCT purchase contract Option Agreement with minor modifications. A copy of that contract is attached to this staff report. The FCT standardized contract was used because staff anticipates that FCT will approve after -the -fact cost -share funding, and use of the FCT contract format will facilitate after -the -fact reimbursement from the FCT. • Enhancement of Overall Area Resource Management If the property was to remain in private ownership and was eventually developed, resource management of existing conservation lands would be difficult in the vicinity of the subject property. Particularly, since the subject property is virtually surrounded by conservation land, resource management via prescribed burning would be constrained, if not impossible. As such, purchase of the subject property will "round -out" public ownership within the North Sebastian Conservation Area and resolve a potential resource management conflict. • Comprehensive Plan Acquisition Commitment Conservation Policy 6.2 of the 2020 County Comprehensive Plan commits the County to acquire a minimum of 100 acres of xeric scrub habitat for conservation purposes. Although the County has fulfilled this minimum acreage requirement, the subject property contributes to this policy by conserving ±19 acres of sand pine scrub. The project also furthers objectives in the County comprehensive plans relating to open space and rare species habitat conservation, particularly relating to the scrub jay HCP that is in progress, as well as to other listed species endemic to xeric scrub habitat. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve exercise of the North Sebastian C.A. Addition (Anstalt) purchase option contract, with the condition that the County coordinate with the Florida Communities Trust for after -the -fact 50% cost -share reimbursement, including update of the overall Conservation Area management plan to include the Anstalt property. • Individual site summary table & general map of property • North Sebastian CA management plan cost estimates • Excerpt of 09/30/98 LAAC meeting minutes • Purchase option contract November 10, 1998 36 APPROVED: FOR: November 10, 1998 BY: Mr. DeBlois responded to questions of Commissioner Ginn concerning costs in this purchase, and progress being made for ability for owners to build on other lots in Sebastian as a result of mitigation of scrub jay habitat. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved exercise of the North Sebastian Conservation Area Addition (Anstalt) purchase option contract, with the condition that the County coordinate with the Florida Communities Trust for after - the -fact 50% cost -share reimbursement, including update of the overall Conservation Area management plan to include the Anstalt property, as recommended in the Memorandum. November 10, 1998 37 BOOK W PAGE 53G' BOOK 107 PAGUE 537 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 98-123 COUNTY MTIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (LEGISLATIVE) P.O. Box 1268 Vero Beach, Florida 32961 562-2315 Preso3"A'arnal COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Darryl M Hicks who on oath Rys that he is President of the Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; :.!Z A Display ad measuring 20 col. inches at $10.62 per col. inch billed toI.R. Planning Dept was published in said newspaper in the issue(s) of Sunday, November 1, 1998 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2nd Afly of November AM 1998 34OM4 A/. 4�" 1 .iAe"# November 10, 1998 I RHONDA STANG Notary Public, State of Florida My !man i:xp. J 2001 Comm. No. CC 611 Personally Knownor Produced ID 0 Type of 10 Produced 38 • NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION AND _AMENDMENT 1 tip o7 %Cl�YY� • Fl1 ne=ae:-saia 'oY�W7iY�W ■ Gt�oe"eano The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will _ consider a WPosal to amend the text of the comprehensive plan and three Proposals to amend the comprehensive plan's future land use designation for land within the incorporated portions of Indian River County. The subject .Properties are owned by several public agencies including the State of Florida, Indian River County, the St. Johns River Water Management District, and the Florida Inland Navigation District A public hearing at which patties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard will beheld on Tuesday, November 10, 1998 at 9:05am in the County Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, located at 1840 25th Street, Vein Beach, Florida At this public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners will consider authorizing transmittal of these amendments to Florida Department of Community Affairs for its review. The proposed amendments are included in Proper ordinances entitled: 1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR 18 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SR AIA, NST NORTH OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES,FORM L-2, LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -2 (UP TO 6 UNITS/ ACRE) TO C-1, PUBLICLY OWNED OR CONTROLLED CONSERVATION-1(ZERO DENSITY); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABJUTY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±37 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, FROM M-2, MEDIUM-DENSrrY RESIDENTIAL -2 (UP TO 10 UNrrS1ACRE) TO C-1, PUBLICLY OWNED OR CONTROLLED CONSERVATION -1 (ZERO DENSrM; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABnXff, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 3. AND ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR Af15.8 ACRE ISLAND LOCATED IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON AT THE WESTERN END OF ISLAND DRIVE ON THE SOUTH BARRIER ISLAND, FORM C-2, PRIVATELY OWNED ESTUARINE WETLANDS CONSERVATION-2.(UP TO 1, UNIT/40 ACRES) TO C-1, PUBLICLY OWNED OR CONTROLLED CONSERVATION-1(ZERO DENSrM; AND PROBING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 4. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE AND NTALCOORDINAnONELEM COWRENEN�PLAN-AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION,, ENTS OFTH SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The Plan amendment application s may be inspected by the public at the Community D B lopment Department located on the second floor of the County �tilding located at 1840 25th Street. Vero Beach, Florida, between the hours of 8:30am and 5:00 pm on weekdays. For more information, contact John Wachtel at 567-8000, extension 247. NO FINAL ACTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ORDINANCES WILL BE TAKEN AT THIS FETING. .Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need -to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the a" is•ban& Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting must contact the county's Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000, extension 223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By: -s -John W. Tippin, Chairman November 10, 1998 39 600KI -j PACEa • 600K 107 PAGE53& Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of this land use amendment request. If the Board approves the transmittal of this application to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in Tallahassee for their 60 -day review, a second and final public hearing will be scheduled to consider any comments made by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by redesignating the land use. If the Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA, the application process will come to an end. He also reviewed a Memorandum of November 2, 1998: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D RTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE Robert M. Keating, AfCP Community Development D r THROUGH: Sasan Robani, AICP S A . Chien Long -Range Planning FROM: John Wachteln/ Senior Planner, ng -Range Planning DATE: November 2,1998 RE: County Initiated Request to Amend the Teat of the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of the Comprehensive Plan PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: CPTA 98-07-0253 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting ofNovember 10, 1998. On February 13, 1990, Indian River County adopted its comprehensive plan. As required by state law, all development activities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan, and all county activities must conform to plan policies. Occasionally, the pian must be updated to reflect the latest and best available information and to address changed conditions. Additionally, the plan must periodically be reviewed and revised in order to reflect the community's changing needs and desires. For those reasons, the county has initiated this amendment The recently completed Evaluation and Appraisal process resulted in major revisions to the text of the comprehensive plan. Nevertheless, after reviewing the plan, staff determined that the Future Land Use and the Intergovernmental Coordination Elements need to be revised at this time. The proposed additions and deletions to the plan are shown on Attachment 2. In this attachment, deletions are strnckont, while additions are un_dedined. On October 8, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve these proposed comprehensive plan text amendments. The_ following proposed changes were not reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission: • the proposed changes to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12; • the proposed changes to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.14; • the proposed changes to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.28; and • the proposed changes to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.29. November 10, 1998 40 Changes to those four policies were recommended by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) after the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. For that reason, those four changes were not reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Because those changes are relatively minor, they are included in this group of proposed amendments despite not having been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Board of County Commissioners is now to decide whether or not to transmit these amendments to DCA for its review. DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS BY ELEMENT In this section, the proposed amendments to each plan element will be discussed. The purpose is to identify the various portions of the plan needing amendment and to present justification for the amendment requests. Future Land Use Element Generally, the proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element clarify policies, address new comprehensive plan requirements, or better address existing comprehensive plan requirements. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.6 defines where the conservation land use designations are located and what uses are permitted within those land use designations. The proposed amendment helps clarify which lands are designated C-1, Publicly Owned or Controlled In the past, there had been a question regarding the land use designation of publicly owned spoil islands in the Indian River Lagoon. The proposed amendment answers that question by specifically designating those islands as C-1. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.12 and 1.14 list the permitted uses on land with the low- and medium -density residential land use designations, respectively. The reason for modifying these policies is to ensure that the plan maintains internal consistency with Future Land Use Element Policies 1.31 and 1.37 which contain provisions for professional office uses within the low- and medium -density land use designations. The proposed amendment modifies Future Land Use Element Policies 1.12 and 1.14 to list professional offices (consistent with Policies 1.31 and 1.37) as permitted uses in the low- and medium -density residential land use designations. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.16 states which uses are permitted within the C/I, Commercial/Industrial, land use designation. The proposed amendment adds land use intensity standards for the commercial industrial land use designation to this policy. State law requires that all local government comprehensive plans contain such standards. In fact, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has raised Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report objections to several recent land use designation amendments based on the county's lack of such standards. In response, the county has committed to amend its plan to include such standards. The proposed amendment also adds data and analysis indicating how those standards were derived. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 limits the expansion of commercial/industrial nodes to instances where the subject node is 70% developed, or otherwise warranted by the proposed November 10, 1998 • 41 BooK 1077 FGE a-- r, Bou 10 7 PAGE 54d I development. "Otherwise warranted" is defined in the policy. The proposed amendment expands the definition of "otherwise warranted" to include the following: • land use designation swaps that involve more than one node where all involved nodes impact the same public facilities, and that do not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map; and • the correction of an oversight or mistake affecting property that meets certain criteria. These changes add clarity and certainty to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 sets a minimum separation distance of 1.5 miles between commercial/industrial nodes. The proposed amendment clarifies the intent of the policy. Besides Commercial/Industrial Nodes, the comprehensive plan also establishes Neighborhood Commercial Nodes. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.26 gives the intent of; and the restrictions on, Neighborhood Commercial Nodes. Recently, however, the potential for another commercial area was added to the comprehensive plan. That area can be located within a Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) project. Through the evaluation and appraisal process, an objective and policies specifically providing for TND projects were added to the comprehensive plan. With the allowance for commercial areas within TND projects, there no longer is a need for new Neighborhood Commercial Nodes. For that reason, the proposed amendment limits Neighborhood Commercial Nodes to their existing areas. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.28 and 1.29 describe the types of uses that are allowed within the Public Facilities and the Recreation land use designations, respectively. Similar to the proposed changes to Policy 1. 16, the proposed amendment adds land use intensity standards to the Public Facilities and the Recreation land use designations. Consistent with recently passed state law, new Future Land Use Element Policies 1.39 and 1.40 encourage schools to locate near urban residential areas, and require the county, to the extent possible, to collocate public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers, with schools. Recent case law in Florida has established that property owners are entitled the most intense zoning district that is consistent with a site's comprehensive plan land use designation, unless the local government's governing body determines that a less intense zoning district on that site serves a legitimate public purpose. November 10, 1998 42 New Future Land Use Element Policy 1.41 has two parts. The first part of this policy establishes that the Board of County Commissioners may rezone land to a zoning district other than the most intense allowed by the site's land use designation, while the second part sets criteria to be used in establishing zoning districts. In that way, the amendment gives the Board additional flexibility regarding zoning decisions, without being arbitrary. New Future Land Use Element Policy 14.5 involves small scale plan amendments. According to state law, future land use amendment requests that meet certain requirements are eligible for a streamlined future land use amendment process. That process is known as the small scale amendment process. Small scale plan amendments are deemed to have fewer impacts than typical plan amendments and, therefore, are eligible for the streamlined adoption process. In contrast to typical plan amendments which require review and approval by DCA, local governments may adopt small scale plan amendments without review or approval by DCA. Section 163.3187(1)(c), FS, sets the following criteria for small scale amendments: 1. The proposed amendment involves 10 or fewer acres; 2. The cumulative effect of the acreage for all small scale amendments in the jurisdiction does not exceed 80 acres in a calendar year, 3. The proposed amendment does not involve the same property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months; 4. The proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months; 5. The proposed amendment does not involve a change to the comprehensive plan's text; 6. The subject property is not within an area of critical state concern; and 7. The proposed amendment does not involve increasing residential density above 10 units/acre. Besides being exempt from DCA review, small scale amendments are also exempt from the state's statutory limitations on the frequency of adopting comprehensive plan amendments. For example, although the number of typical plan amendments that a local government may consider is not limited, the frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is regulated by state law. According to Florida Statutes, typical plan amendments are limited to twice per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts typical plan amendment applications only during the two `window" months of January and July. All requests submitted during each window month are processed simultaneously. That method ensures that typical plan amendments will be adopted no more than twice per calendar year. State law, however, provides several exceptions to the twice per calendar year limitation. One of those exceptions is for small scale plan amendments. Consequently, a local government may adopt small scale amendments without regard for the twice per calendar year limitation. The proposed amendment sets additional measurable criteria for the use of the small scale plan amendment process. Adopting the additional criteria will work to prevent the use of the small scale plan amendment process to circumvent the typical plan amendment process for requests that warrant substantial public or reviewing agency input. November 10, 1998 43 BOOK 107 NOE'-� '' BOOK J07 PAGE Intergovernmental Coordination Element Recent changes to state rules require the proposed changes to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. Section 163.3177(6)(h)3., FS, requires comprehensive plans to discuss Independent Special Districts. Consistent with that requirement, the proposed amendment adds that information to the comprehensive plan. Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 3.9 commits the county to establishing a formal coordination mechanism with its municipalities and adjacent counties, by 2000. Consistent with recent changes to state law [163.3177(6)(h)l.a and 2., FS], the proposed amendment requires that mechanism to identify joint planning areas, and to address the identification of locally unwanted land uses. Following a discussion of the consistency of the proposed amendments with the comprehensive plan, this section will present an analysis of the reasonableness of each of the proposed amendments. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Comprehensive plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the county code, the "comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), FS." The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions—including plan amendment decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment requests. Of particular applicability to these proposed amendments is the following policy. Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 In evaluating any comprehensive plan amendment request, the most important consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a comprehensive plan amendment. These criteria are: • a mistake in the approved plan; • an oversight in the approved plan; • a substantial change in circumstances; or • For Future Land Use Map amendments, the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at separate sites and, that that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. November 10, 1998 0 • The following matrix summarizes which of the above criteria are met by each proposed amendment. PROPOSED AMENDMENT MISTAKE OVERSIGHT CHANGE IN CIRCUMSTANCES FLUE Policy 1.6 X FLUE Policy 1.12 X FLUE Policy 1.14 X FLUE Page 61 & Policy 1.16 X FLUE Policy 1.22 X FLUE Policy 1.23 X FLUE Policy 1.26 X FLUE Policy 1.28 X FLUE Policy 1.29 X New FLUE Policy 1.39 X New FLUE Policy 1.40 X New FLUE Policy 1.41 & Table 2.13 X New FLUE Policy 14.5 X ICE Page 19 X ICE Policy 3.9 X FLUE - Future Land Use Element ICE - Intergovernmental Coordination Element These changes are relatively minor. They add clarity to the policies and address issues (such as the land use designation of spoil islands in the Indian River Lagoon and land use designation swaps) that, due to oversights, were not addressed in the original plan. Because they correct oversights in the comprehensive plan, the proposed amendments are consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Although required by state law, land use intensity standards for the Commercial/Industrial, Public Facilities, and Recreation land use designations were not specifically included in the comprehensive plan. Although the plan was amended numerous times, neither the county nor the state reviewing agency (the Department of Community Affairs) noticed this situation until recently. The omission from the comprehensive plan of land use intensity standards for commercial/industrial land use designations constitutes an oversight. By adding land use intensity standards for the Commercial/ Industrial, Public Facilities, and Recreation land use designations to the comprehensive plan, the proposed amendment corrects that oversight. For that reason, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. November 10, 1998 45 CJ BOOK 1J e PAGE'- BOOK 107 PAGE 5 5 When originally adopted, the plan included provisions for Neighborhood Commercial Nodes to meet the convenience retail and service needs of neighborhoods. In terms of providing those services, however, the Neighborhood Commercial Nodes have had limited success. Those nodes, in fact, have functioned similarly to the more common CommerciaUIndustrial Nodes. As part of the county's recently completed evaluation and appraisal process, however, the county added an objective and policies to allow and encourage Tradition Neighborhood Design (TND) Projects. By definition, TND Projects include neighborhood commercial type uses. With the addition of potential TND Projects, there is no longer a need for new or expanded Neighborhood Commercial Nodes. For that reason, the proposed amendment limits Neighborhood Commercial Nodes to existing areas. Therefore, the adoption of an objective and policies to allow and encourage TND projects constitutes a change in circumstances related the proposed amendment. For that reason, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Each of these proposed amendments relates directly to recent changes in state law. Those changes constitute a change in circumstances affecting the proposed amendments. For that reason, these proposed amendments are consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. When adopted, the plan set general land use and zoning guidelines. Since plan adoption, however, case law has specifically determined that landowners are entitled to the most intense zoning district that is consistent with the site's land use designation, unless the governing body determines that a less intense zoning district serves a legitimate public purpose. The proposed amendments set specific criteria indicating when a site may be given a zoning district other than the most intense allowed by the land use designation. The case law determinations constitute a change in circumstances that affects the proposed amendments. For that reason, these proposed amendments are consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Although provisions for small scale amendments were present in state law, the county did not take advantage of them until the recent Hale Groves amendment. While processing that amendment, it became clear that local criteria, in addition to state criteria would be necessary to determine which, if any, future amendments would be processed as small scale amendments. The fact that such criteria were not originally included in the plan constitutes an oversight. By setting criteria for processing an amendment as a small scale amendment, the proposed change corrects that oversight. For that reason, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. While Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3, is particularly applicable to these proposed plan amendments, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the proposed amendments for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the proposed changes to the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements are consistent with the comprehensive plan. November 10, 1998 46 ANALYSIS OF REASONABLENESS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Future Land Use Element This is a minor change clarifying that C-1 designated parcels are publicly owned or controlled, and that publicly owned spoil islands in the Indian River Lagoon are designated C-1. This is a minor change that ensures that Policies 1.12 and 1.14 will be consistent with Policies 1.31 and 1.37. Consistent with state law, this policy adds land use intensity standards for the Commercial/Industrial, Public Facilities, and Recreation land use designations. For residential land use designations, land use intensity standards, in the form of maximum densities, are already found in the plan. The generally accepted intensity standard for non-residential development is Floor Area Ratio (FAR). FAR is a measure of non-residential land use intensity expressed as the ratio of building floor space on a parcel to total parcel area. For example, a 10,000 square foot building on a one acre parcel has a .23 FAR (10,000/43,560 = .23). In such a case, a 5,000 square foot second story would increase the FAR to .34 (15,000/43,560 = .34). Although the county has not had an established FAR in its Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.17 and other plan policies require the county to adopt land development regulations that regulate the mass and height of buildings, the amount of impervious surface, the amount of parldng, and the amount of open space. These land development regulations have been adopted and have effectively controlled non-residential land use intensities. Within Indian River County, most non-residential developments generally have FAR's within the 0.1 to 0.2 range. The highest FAR is approximately 0.45, while the lowest FAR is approximately 0.07. Therefore, the county's land development regulations generally result in development occurring at an intensity of less than a 0.45 FAR Different non-residential uses, however, have different impacts on public facilities and services, and on surrounding areas. For example, according to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 1,000 square feet of retail uses, 6,000 square feet of general office uses and 14,000 square feet of general industrial uses all generate 98 peak hour trips. Therefore, one FAR limit is not appropriate for all non-residential uses. In fact, to equally limit the impacts of different uses, it is necessary to allow a greater FAR for general industrial use than for office uses, and a greater FAR for office uses than for retail uses. For that reason, the proposed changes to Policy 1.16 set a three tiered FAR limit. Retail uses are limited to an FAR of 0.23, office uses are limited to an FAR of 0.35, and industrial and storage uses are limited to an FAR of 0.50. Policy 1.29 limits development within the Recreation land use designation to an FAR of 0.25. Those levels of intensity are consistent with the low-density, low- rise character of the county. November 10, 1998 47 BOOK PAGE a6 BOOK 107 PACE 547 The proposed amendment sets specific criteria for node expansions where the subject node is less than 70% developed and involving the following: • land use designation swaps involving more than one node; and • corrections of mistakes or oversights affecting residentially designated property. Although such node expansions have occurred in the past, setting specific criteria clarifies the policy and decreases the chances of misapplication of the policy. Specifically, the proposed amendment ensures that land use designation swaps involving more than one node will not increase potential impacts on any public facilities, and that such a swap will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the future land use map. The proposed amendment also limits node expansions that correct an oversight or a mistake to ten acre sites. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 sets a minimum separation distance of 1.5 miles between commercial/industrial nodes. The proposed amendment rewords the policy to clarify the intent of the policy. The proposed amendment recognizes that development within Neighborhood Commercial Nodes either has not occurred or has not been truly neighborhood oriented. The county, however, has provided for TND Projects that incorporate neighborhood commercial uses as part of the project. Such TND Projects may prove to be a viable alternative to new or expanded Neighborhood Commercial Nodes. Rather than going through the entire rezoning process to totally eliminate Neighborhood Commercial Nodes, the proposed amendment allows the seven existing Neighborhood Commercial Nodes to continue in their current configuration. The creation of new Neighborhood Commercial Nodes or the expansion of exiting ones, however, is prohibited by the proposed amendment. Keeping the existing Neighborhood Commercial Nodes also protects the private property rights of the owners of land within those nodes. Although the county and the school board coordinate in an informal manner regarding many of the issues covered in these policies, the proposed amendment requires greater formal coordination. The purpose of the amendments is to encourage the location of schools, parks, libraries and community centers in near residential areas. Locating community facilities near residences efficiently uses county resources, discourages urban sprawl, reduces automobile trips, and allows children to walk to many destinations (e.g. schools, libraries and parks). These changes specifically recognize that not every zoning district allowed in a land use designation is appropriate for every site within that land use designation. Table 2.13 specifically identifies which November 10, 1998 48 40 0 • zoning districts are allowed in each land use designation. New Policy 1.41 sets general criteria identifying where each zoning district should and should not be located. The type of criteria considered includes, but is not limited to, compatibility with surrounding areas and the availability of transportation facilities. These changes will guide future county rezoning decisions, and will increase overall development compatibility within the county. Florida Statutes set specific criteria to ensure that small scale amendments have smaller impacts than typical plan amendments. Nevertheless, it is necessary to set additional local criteria to determine whether or not a plan amendment request can be processed as a small scale amendment. That will decrease the chances that the small scale amendment process will be used in an arbitrary or unfair manner. The additional criteria also work to prevent the use of the small scale amendment process to circumvent the typical plan amendment process for requests that warrant substantial public and reviewing agency input. In addition to minor processing requirements, the criteria mandate that the small scale amendment process cannot be used for plan amendments that involve important land use issues such as development of environmentally important or environmentally sensitive land, development outside the urban service area, expansion of the urban service area, or expansion of the SR 60/58th Avenue commercial/industrial node. Intergovernmental Coordination Element This change, required by state law, adds information to the plan. The proposed amendment identifies the special districts that operate in the county, and discusses their functions and powers. Additionally, the proposed amendment acknowledges that, consistent with Section 189.415, FS, each special district must submit a public facilities report with annual notice of any changes to the county. These changes make the plan a more useful source of information, and require the county to be more aware of the activities of special districts. Policy 3.9 requires formal coordination between the county and its municipalities, and adjacent counties. The proposed amendment, mandated by state law, requires greater coordination by requiring the identification of two additional areas that can have impacts beyond jurisdictional boundaries. Those areas are Joint Planning Areas (JPA} and Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULU). JPAs are areas that require coordinated planning. Examples of these areas may include environmentally important land that straddles a jurisdictional boundary, a roadway corridor that runs through more than one jurisdiction, or an area in one jurisdiction that receives services from another jurisdiction. Identifying JPAs allows local governments to maximize existing resources and to avoid future problems. The proposed amendment also requires the identification of LULUS, which are usually public facilities that are needed by the community, but have large impacts on nearby areas. Examples of LULUs include landfills and wastewater treatment plants. By identifying existing and planned LULUs, local governments can work to reduce and mitigate impacts November 10, 1998 49 • BOOK 10.7 PAGE eJ- BOOK 107 PAGE S-4� The proposed amendments will enhance the plan by updating the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements to reflect changes in state law and other circumstances. The proposed changes to the Future Land Use Element add accuracy and clarity to the comprehensive plan. Also, the analysis demonstrates that these amendments maintain the plan's internal consistency. For these reasons, staff supports the adoption of the proposed amendments. Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit the proposed comprehensive plan text amendments to DCA for their review. 1. Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Application 2. Proposed Revisions to the Comprehensive Plan 3. Approved minutes of the October 8, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 4. Transmittal Resolution Commissioner Eggert expressed concerns on Policy 1.26 and following some discussion, it was suggested, and agreed, that the rest of the policies could be transmitted and Policy 1.26 could be eliminated at this time. Vice Chairman Macht expressed concern with Policy 1.3 9 as he did not want libraries to have to be located near a school. It was pointed out that the word "encourage" was used and the policy was not mandatory. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 98-123 approving the transmittal of a proposed amendment, after removal of Policy 1.26, to the Comprehensive Plan to the State of Florida Department of .Community Affairs for its review. November 10, 1998 50 • RESOLUTION NO. 98- 12 --1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its July, 1998 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan amendment request on October 8, 1998 after due public notice, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment listed below to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal Public Hearing on November 10, 1998, after advertising pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1), and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: November 10, 1998 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. 2. The following proposed amendment is approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs for written comment: Request to amend the Future Land Use Element and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 51 BOOK 107 PAGE aU BOOK 10 7 PAcF551 RESOLUTION NO. 98- t 2 3 The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Adams and seconded by Commissioner G i n n and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin A y e Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Ay e Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A y e The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held this 10' day of November 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ' t BY: ohn W. Tippin, I � 1 ATTEST: 1 ey K. Barton, Cle;� November 10, 1998 tMti Film G Approved Dafe Admin i4 y Legal Budget Dept. !` z Risk Mgr, 52 9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 98-124 COUNTY - INITIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±8 ACRES FROM L-2 TO C-1: TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±37 ACRES FROM M-2 AND C-2 TO C-1: AND TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±15.8 ACRES FROM C-2 TO C-1 (LEGISLATIVE,) - ENVIRONMENTAL LAND: IRWIN TRACT, FLINN TRACT, AND GREEN SALTMARSH P.O. Box 1268 Vero Beach, Florida 32961 562-2315 all Prey 31ournal COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Daryl K Hicks who on oath says that he is President of the Press -Journal, a da FlSid a; that newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, A Display ad measuring 20 col. inches at $10.62 per col. inch billed to I.R. Planning Dept. was published in said newspaper in the issue(s) of Sunday, November 1, 1998 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2n� day o1;— November AM1998 A/ Zink Prpcirlanf �ONDA Sjq�aa M1(OMSMI EVRES MW 11, 2001 cut No. CC611093 . o November 10, 1998 ."4120n WA. RHONDA STING Notary Public, State of Florida My Commission Exp Ja0,6 t. 2001 Comm. No. CC 611 Pwsmlalhr KoOsrn ar Produced ID O Type of ID Produced 53 GOOK D7 PAGE 552 NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAN USE DESIGNATION AND _ AMENDMENT .� l L_2 9 . a L-2 The Boatel of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. will _ consider a proposal to amend the text of the comprehensive plan and three proposals to amend the comprehensive plan's future land use designation for land within the incorporated portions of Indian River County. The subject properties are owned by several public agencies including the State of Florida, I Oran River County, the St. Johns River Water Management District, and the Florida Inland Navigation District A public hearing at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held on Tuesday, November 10. 1998 at 9:05am in the County Commission Chambers of the County Admiaisuation Building, located at 1840 25th Street. Vero Beach, Florida At this public hearing. the Board of County Commissioners will consider authorizing transmittal of these amendments to Florida Department of Community Affairs for its review. The proposed amendments are included in proposed ordinances entitled: 1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR g ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SR AIA. JUST NORTH OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES.FORM L-2, LOW-DENSITY RESIDEN7IAL-2 (UP TO 6 UNITS/ ACRE) TO C-1, PUBLICLY OWNED OR CONTROLLED CONSERVATION -1 (ZERO DENSITY); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±37 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, FROM M-2, MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENT IAL -2 (UP TO 10 UNIIWACRE) TO C-1. PUBLICLY OWNED OR CONTROLLED CONSERVATION -1 (ZERO DENSITY); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 3. AND ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR At15.8 ACRE ISLAND LOCATED IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON AT THE WESTERN END OF ISLAND DRIVE ON THE SOUTH BARRIER ISLAND, FORM C-2, PRIVATELY OWNED ESTUARINE WETLANDS CONSERVATION-2.(UP TO I. UNTr/40 ACRES) TO C-1, PUBLICLY OWNED OR CONTROLLED CONSERVATION -1 (ZERO DENSITY); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION; SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 4. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELMOENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The plan amendment application s may be inspected by the public at the Community Development Department located on the second floor of the County Administration Building located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, between the hours of 8:30am and 5:00 pm on weekdays. For more information. contact John Wachtel at 567-8000, extension 247. NO FINAL ACTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ORDINANCES WILL BE TAKEN AT THIS MEETING. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need -to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is'based. Anyone who needs a special qc commodation for this meeting must contact the county's Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000, extension 223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By: -s -John W. Tippin, Chairman November 10, 1998 54 BOOK 10 7 PAGE 553 • Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the comprehensive Plan amendment process, advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on this land use amendment request. If the Board approves the transmittal of this application to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in Tallahassee for their 60 -day review, a second and final public hearing will be scheduled go consider any comments made by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by redesignating the land use. If the Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA, the application process will come to an end. He also reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 1998: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE V.10 . 0 Obert Mr. Keating, AI Community Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP 5. Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: John Wachte Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning DATE: October 29, 1998 RE: County Initiated Request to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±8 Acres From L-2 to C-1; to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate +-37 Acres From M-2 And C-2 to C-1; And to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±15.8 Acres From C-2 to C-1 PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 98-07-0252 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 10, 1998. This is a county initiated request involving three separate parcels, each of which contains environmentally sensitive and important land now under some form of public ownership. Attachments 3 and 4 show the location of the subject properties. Summarized in the table below, this request involves changing both the land use designation and the zoning of each site. The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary land use designation and zoning to reflect the subject properties' public ownership and to ensure that the subject properties' environmental significance will be preserved. November 10, 1998 55 i rQ BOOK 1U7 FACE 55) BOOK i07 FACE 555 On October 8, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed land use amendment and rezoning. The Board of County Commissioners is now to decide whether or not to transmit this land use designation amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for their review. - Subject Property 1 Bounded on the east by the Atlantic Ocean and on the west by SR AlA, Subject Property 1 and adjacent property to the north consist of undeveloped native upland plant communities and are zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 umts/acre). West of Subject Property 1, across SR AIA, is the entrance to the Island Club Subdivision. North of that entrance is the Jungle Trail Conservation Area. Stretching from the Indian River Lagoon to the Atlantic Ocean, the Jungle Trail Conservation Area includes the property abutting Subject Property 1 on the north. Formerly referred to as the Cairns Tract, the Jungle Trail Conservation Area consists of more than 100 acres of environmentally important tropical maritime hammock and is zoned RM -6. That land was purchased jointly by the state and the county for conservation purposes. Funds for the county's portion of the purchase came from its Environmental Lands Acquisition Program, while state funds came from the state Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program. In the future, the county plans to rezone the Jungle Trail Conservation Area to Con -1, Public Lands Conservation District (zero density). South of the Jungle Trail Conservation Area is the RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), zoned Island Club Subdivision. Land abutting the subject property on the south is within the boundaries of the Town of Indian River Shores. That land is zoned R2A, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre), and contains the Baytree Condominiums. November 10, 1998 56 SUBJECT PROPERTY 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY 2 SUBJECT PROPERTY 3 KNOWN AS Irwin Tract Flinn Tract Green Saltmarsh LOCATION East side of SR AIA, just Northeast corner of 8" West of St. Christophers north of the Town of Indian Street and Indian River Harbor Subdivision River Shores Boulevard SIZE IN ACRES 8 37 15.8 CURRENT LAND USE L-2, Low -Density M-2, Medium -Density C-2, Privately owned DESIGNATION Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre) Residential -2 (up to 10 units/acre); and C-2, Estuarine Wetlands Conservation -2 (up to 1 Privately Owned Estuarine umV40 acres) Wetlands Conservation -2 NO to 1 umt/40 acres) PROPOSED C-1, Publicly Owned or C-1, Publicly Owned or C-1. Publicly owned or LAND USE Controlled Conservatioo-1 Controlled Conservation -1 Controlled Conservation -1 DESIGNATION (zero density) (zero density) (zero density) CURRENT RM -6, Multiple -Family RS -1, Single -Family RS -1, Single -Family ZONING Residential District (up to 6 Residential District (up to 1 Residential District (up to 1 uoitslacre) uoittacre) unitlacre) PROPOSED Cork, Public Lands Con -1, Public Lands Con -1, Public Lando ZONING Conservation District (zero Conservation District (zero Conservation District (zero density) density) density) ACQUISITION Purchased Purchased Donated METHOD FUNDING 75% from the State's Indian River County: 540/0 Not applicable METHOD Conservation and Recreation Leads (CARL) Program Florida Inland Navigation District: 25% 25% from die County's Environmental Lands St. Johns River Water Program Management District 21% OWNERSHIP State of Florida 1009/6 Indian River County - .5001a Indian River County - .100% Indian River County: 50 year Florida Inland Navigation management lease; District 250/6 negotiating title agreement St. Johns River Water Management District 25% On October 8, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed land use amendment and rezoning. The Board of County Commissioners is now to decide whether or not to transmit this land use designation amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for their review. - Subject Property 1 Bounded on the east by the Atlantic Ocean and on the west by SR AlA, Subject Property 1 and adjacent property to the north consist of undeveloped native upland plant communities and are zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 umts/acre). West of Subject Property 1, across SR AIA, is the entrance to the Island Club Subdivision. North of that entrance is the Jungle Trail Conservation Area. Stretching from the Indian River Lagoon to the Atlantic Ocean, the Jungle Trail Conservation Area includes the property abutting Subject Property 1 on the north. Formerly referred to as the Cairns Tract, the Jungle Trail Conservation Area consists of more than 100 acres of environmentally important tropical maritime hammock and is zoned RM -6. That land was purchased jointly by the state and the county for conservation purposes. Funds for the county's portion of the purchase came from its Environmental Lands Acquisition Program, while state funds came from the state Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program. In the future, the county plans to rezone the Jungle Trail Conservation Area to Con -1, Public Lands Conservation District (zero density). South of the Jungle Trail Conservation Area is the RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), zoned Island Club Subdivision. Land abutting the subject property on the south is within the boundaries of the Town of Indian River Shores. That land is zoned R2A, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre), and contains the Baytree Condominiums. November 10, 1998 56 • - Subject Property 2 Located at the northeast corner of 8'` Street and Indian River Boulevard, Subject Property 2 Consists of t21 acres of coastal oak hammock and t16 acres of estuarine wetlands. The coastal oak hammock generally is located near Indian River Boulevard, while the estuarine wetlands generally are located along the Indian River Lagoon. Adjacent properties to the north also contain coastal oak hammock along Indian River Boulevard and estuarine wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon. While all of Subject Property 2 is zoned RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 unittacre), only the eastern portions of adjacent properties to the north and south are zoned RS -1. The western portions of those properties are zoned RM -10, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 10 units/acre). Currently under construction on land along Subject Property 2's south boundary is the River Park Place Multiple -Family development. West of Subject Property 2, across Indian River Boulevard, land is zoned RM -10 and contains the Kyles Run Apartments. Although zoned RS -1 in the County Zoning Atlas, environmentally important wetlands, such as those along the Indian River Lagoon, are deemed to be zoned Con -2, wetland Conservation District (up to 1 unit/40 acres). - Subject Property 3 Located on the western edge of the southern barrier island, just west of St. Christopher's Harbor Subdivision, Subject Property 3 is nearly surrounded by the Indian River Lagoon. Zoned RS -1 in the county zoning atlas, Subject Property 3 is undeveloped and consists entirely of impounded estuarine wetlands. Nearby lands on the barrier island, to the east of Subject Property 3, are zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre), and consist of single-family subdivisions and unplatted lots. -Subject Property 1 Subject Property 1 and most land to the west, including the Island Club Subdivision, are designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, on the county's future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. Land within the Jungle Trail Conservation Area, including land abutting Subject Property 1 on the north and the remaining land to the west of Subject Property 1, are designated C-1, Publicly Owned or Controlled Conservation-1(zero density). The C-1 designation permits conservation and passive recreational uses. South of the subject property, land is designated MD, Moderate Density Residential, on the Town of Indian River Shores' future land use map. The MD designation permits residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. - Subject Property 2 With the exception of estuarine wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon, Subject Property 2 and all surrounding properties are designated M-2, Medium -Density Residential -2, on the county's future land use map. The M-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 10 units/acre. The estuarine wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon are designated C-2, Estuarine Wetlands Conservation -2. The C-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to Iunit/40 acres on site or off site density transfer credits of up to 1 unit/acre. November 10, 1998 57 BOOK 107 PAGE 55 BOOK 107 PAGE557 - Subject Property 3 Subject Property 3 is designated C-2 on the county's future land use map. Nearby lands on the barrier island, to the east of Subject Property 3, are designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on the county's future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. - Subject Property 1 Containing one of the few remaining sizable maritime hammock/coastal strand communities in Indian River County, Subject Property 1 has several environmentally significant features. One of those features pertains to sea turtles. The coastal areas of northern Indian River County, including Subject Property 1, and southern Brevard County have one of the highest sea turtle nesting densities in this hemisphere. Therefore, Subject Property 1's ±673 linear feet of undeveloped ocean frontage combined with the adjacent Cairns Tract's (1,155 linear feet of undeveloped ocean frontage are important to the preservation of several species of sea turtles. Additionally, because Subject Property 1 is located in an area with a high probability of having archaeological sites, shell middens and/or other archaeological sites may exist on the property. Finally, eastern portions of Subject Property 1 are within a "VE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of seventeen feet NGVD. - Subject Property 2 Providing habitat to several species of listed wading birds, Subject Property 2 consists of ±21 acres of coastal oak hammock and f 16 acres of wetlands (impounded estuarine salt marsh) associated with the Indian River Lagoon. The subject property is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of six to seven feet NGVD. - Subject Property 3 Subject Property 3 consists of f 16 acres of impounded estuarine wetlands associated with the Indian River Lagoon. Subject Property 3 also provides habitat for several species of listed wading birds. Mangroves are the primary native vegetation on the site. The subject property is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of five feet NGVD. - Subject Property 1 Although the site is located within the North County Water Service Area, water lines extend to Subject Property 1 from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. When the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant, which is currently undergoing final testing, becomes operational, the site can be served primarily by that plant. Wastewater lines extend to the site from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. - Subject Property 2 Water lines extend to Subject Property 2 from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant, while wastewater lines extend to the site from the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. November 10, 1998 58 • - Subject Property 3 Water lines extend to within a quarter mile of Subject Property 3 from the City of Vero Beach Water Plant, while wastewater lines extend to within a quarter mile of the site from the City of Vero Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant. - Subject Property 1 Subject Property 1 can be accessed from SR AIA, a two-lane road with approximately 100 feet of public road right-of-way. The segment of SR AlA adjacent to Subject Property 1 is classified as an urban minor arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map and is programmed for expansion to 120 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020. - Subject Property 2 Subject Property 2 abuts Indian River Boulevard which is classified as an urban principal arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of Indian River Boulevard is a four -lane paved road with approximately 150 feet of public road right-of-way. There are no plans to expand Indian River Boulevard. - Subject Property 3 Subject Property 3 cannot be accessed directly from an automobile. Island Drive, a private local road, links the site to SR AIA. Classified as an urban minor arterial, that segment of SR AIA is a two lane paved road with approximately 100 feet of public road right-of-way. That segment of SR A 1 is programmed for expansion to an urban principal arterial with 120 feet of public road right- of-way by 2020. In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. This section will include the following: • an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the proposed amendment's compatibility with surrounding areas; • an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and • an analysis of the proposed amendment's potential impact on environmental quality. Each site comprising this request is located within the County Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed. For land use designation amendment requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency determination application process. As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt from concurrency requirements. For the subject request, ±21 acres of M-2 designated land, ±8 acres of L-2 designated land, and ±32 acres of C-2 designated land with a total development potential of ±275 units will be replaced with ±61 acres of C-1 designated land. Since C-1 designated property November 10, 1998 59 BOOK 10 7 PAGE '556' BOOK M FACE 550' has a zero density, the proposed amendment will result in a decrease of ±275 units in the overall development potential of the subject properties. Because of that overall decrease in land use intensity of ±275 units, this land use amendment request is exempt from concurrency review. It is important to note that adoption of the proposed land use amendment will not impact any public facilities or services. Under the requested C-1 land use designation, there will be no development on the subject properties except for minor facilities associated with passive recreation activities. For that reason, the subject request will enhance compatibility between the sites and surrounding land uses. In contrast to the ±275 units allowed under the existing land use designations, development under the requested land use designation will be limited to conservation uses and passive recreational uses. In terms of traffic, noise, and aesthetics, the impacts associated with uses allowed under the proposed C-1 land use designation will be significantly less than those that would occur with development under the existing land use designations. In fact, the passive recreational uses allowed under the requested zoning district will serve as an amenity for nearby residential uses. For these reasons, staff has determined that the requested land use designation is compatible with the surrounding area. Land use amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the land development regulations, the "comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), FS." Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions --including plan amendment and rezoning decisions. While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives. - Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 In evaluating a land use amendment request, the most important consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria are: • The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property; or November 10, 1998 W • • The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at separate sites and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed land use amendment meets the policy's third criterion. On February 13, 1990, when the comprehensive plan was adopted, the subject properties were in private ownership. At that time, the sites were correctly designated for residential uses. Since then, the sites have been purchased for conservation purposes. The acquisition of the sites by public agencies constitutes a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject properties and meets the third criterion of Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. - Future Land Use Element Policies 1.5 and 1.6 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.5 states that the conservation land use designations are applied to those areas which are vital or essential to the normal functions of ecosystems and have been identified in the Conservation Element as meriting preservation. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.6 limits the use of C-1 designated land to conservation and passive recreational uses. As publicly owned sites containing estuarine wetlands and native upland habitat, each of the subject properties meets those criteria. For those reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policies 1.5 and 1.6. As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the proposed land use designation amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The sites' existing land use designations offer only limited environmental protections. Residential development on the subject properties would be required to preserve only 15 percent of the upland habitat of the sites. In contrast, under the proposed land use designation, the entire area of each site would be preserved, and development would be limited to conservation and compatible passive recreational uses. Although the sites are publicly owned and could be developed as public parks under the existing land use designations, the proposed land use designation provides the sites with additional protection from development. By prohibiting most types of development on the sites, the proposed request will ensure that the environmental quality of the sites will be preserved. For these reasons, the proposed land use amendment is anticipated to positively impact the environmental quality of the subject properties. Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the proposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan, compatible with all surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts on the provision of public services. The proposed changes work to ensure the preservation of environmentally sensitive and important habitat. For these reasons, staff supports the request. Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit this proposed land use designation amendment request to DCA for their review. November 10, 1998 61 • Boy 0 8 PAGE "'O Fr BOOK W7 PAGE 1. Land Use Designation Amendment Application 2. Rezoning Application 3. Land Use Designation Location Maps 4. Zoning Location Maps 5. Approved minutes of the October 8, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 6. Transmittal Resolution The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 98-124 approving the transmittal of a proposed amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs for its review. RESOLUTION NO. 98- 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its July, 1998 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan amendment request on October 8, 1998 after due public notice, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment listed below to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal Public Hearing on November 10, 1998, after advertising pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1), and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process. November 10, 1998 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 98- 124 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. 2. The following proposed amendment is approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs for written comment: Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre) to C-1, Publicly Owned or Controlled Conservation -I (zero density) for ±8 acres located on the east side of SR AIA, just north of the town of Indian River Shores; to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from M-2, Medium - Density Residential -2 (up to 10 units/acre) and C-2, Privately Owned Estuarine Wetlands Conservation -2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres) to C-1, Publicly Owned or Controlled Conservation -I (zero density) for ±37 acres located at the northeast corner of 8`s Street and Indian River Boulevard; and to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from C-2, Privately Owned Estuarine Wetlands Conservation -2 (up to I unit/40 acres) to C-1, Publicly Owned or Controlled Conservation -1 (zero density) for ±15.8 acres located west of St. Christopher's Harbor Subdivision. The forgoing Resolution was offered Commissioner Ginn by Commissioner �''–� ami -- and seconded by and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin p a Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht —� Ova Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert ay e Commissioner Caroline D. Ginne P The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held this 10`i' day of November 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA John W. Tipp' ATTEST: y K. Barton, Clem ��7 November 10, 1998 Indmin Fkw Ca Aoorored D81e Admin 4� Legal Gt, Bu,get Devi. Risk Mgr. 63 BOOK 107 PAGE" BOOK CLERK'S NOTE: At approximately 10:30 a.m., the Chairman declared a brief recess. All members of the Commission were present when the meeting reconvened about 8 minutes later. 11.E. OPTIONAL SALES TAX - THIRD FIVE YEARS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 3, 1998: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 3, 1998 SUBJECT: OPTIONAL SALES TAR - THIRD FIVE YEARS FROM: James E. Chandler Joseph A. County Administiator OMB Dir Background Information �10 6 PAGE 5 3 Chapter 87-239 Laws of Florida initiated the "Local Government Infrastructure Commitment Act", which allowed counties to levy, for a period of up to fifteen years, a one cent tax on all transactions subject to taxation under Chapter 212.054 of the Florida statutes. In order to enact the surtax, an ordinance must be passed by the majority of the members of the Board of County Commissioners and then approved by a majority of votes in a referendum or passed by governing bodies of municipalities, representing a majority of the County's population, and approved by a majority of voters in a referendum. The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, on January 31, 1989 passed ordinance 89-6 calling for a county -wide referendum on the levy of the one cent sales tax to be held on Tuesday, March 14, 1989. Shortly thereafter the Optional Sales Tax was endorsed by every City within Indian River County. The Chamber ofCommerce, Taxpayers Association, Civic Association, Gifford Progressive League, Board ofRealtors, Association of General Contractors and the Treasure Coast Home Builders Association all endorsed the Optional Sales Tax at that time. The voters passed the Optional Sales Tax to go into effect June 1, 1989. (60.3% voted for the tax and 39.7% voted against the tax.) When promoting the Optional Sales Tax, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners put additional constraints on the use of the sales tax by promising that proceeds would be used only for essential capital projects. It was also emphasized that in the future a good portion of Optional Sales Tax would go towards the purchase of right-of-way and roads to help offset the deficit in the Comprehensive Plan. An additional commitment was made to have a list of projects approved in five year intervals by the Board of County Commissioners in a public hearing. We have reached the point to begin planning the third and final five year list of projects (actually only 4 %s years remaining - October 1, 1999 to May 31, 2004). For "preliminary planning purposes" the County Administrator and Budget Office has requested a list of major projects from each department. Attached is an unedited list of all projects submitted by departments. Project costs are very rough and have not been verified for accuracy or reasonableness. This is simply the first stage of the process in which we begin compiling the list of projects and their estimated cost. Staff is submitting the list to the Board of County commissioners for discussion. The final decision on which projects will be funded through optional sales tax will be recommended by the County Administrator and approved by the Board of County Commissioners in the spring of 1999. Attachments November 10, 1998 Administrator Chandler advised that this item was for information only; the full program will be presented in the spring of 1999. He added that any input the Board may have will be included at that time. Commissioner Eggert commented that when the North and Main Library's budgets were done, a proper amount had not been included for the required equipment. She had spoken to Budget Director Joseph A. Baird and understood that he had included those dollars in the West Library's budget figures. Director Baird confirmed that additional money had been added to the West Library's budget for the equipment. His office is studying the North and South Library's budget figures to determine whether funding had already been included. If necessary, the appropriate amounts will be added before the next time the Board reviews the planned appropriations. Commissioner Eggert also stated that the North Library was in desperate need of expansion and asked if there was any possibility that funding for architectural plans could be moved up to FY 1999-2000 (from FY 2000-2001) so the expansion could actually be built the following year. Director Baird advised that the dollars could be moved, and Administrator Chandler added that these figures had been plugged in and were subject to change under the direction of the Board. Commissioner Eggert was pleased to see that Emergency Services Director Doug Wright had gotten the Emergency Services "guestimates" and locations into the preliminary figures. She hoped the Board would continue funding efforts on the Library system. 11.G.1. RESOLUTION NO. 98-125 - AS -BUILT RESOLUTION AND ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 101ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET IN VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION - PROJECT 9309 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 27, 1998: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Directo FROM: Michelle A Gentile, CET Civil Engineer November 10, 1998 65 600K iN PAGE 56 BOOK � . 0 Pr?%E 58 SUBJECT: As -Built Resolution & Assessment Roll for Paving and Drainage Improvements to: 101 sT AVENUE BETWEEN 79TH STREET & 87TH STREET IN VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION - IRC PROJECT NO. 9309 DATE: October 27, 1998 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The paving of the above road has been completed. The final assessment is as follows: Preliminary Estimates Final Cost MSTU $232,353.59 -92.32%+ MSTU $213,152.73 -91.68%+ Special Assessment $ 19,334.74 - 7.68%+ Special Assessment $ 19.334.74 - 8.32%+ Total $251,688.33 1 Total $232,487.47 The final assessment roll has been prepared and is ready to be delivered to the Clerk to the Board. Assessments are to be paid within 90 days or in 2 equal installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date at an interest rate of 8'/z%, established by the Board of County Commissioners. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Since the final costs are less than the preliminary costs, the final cost allocation would be to access the benefitted owners $2.00 per front foot, deduct the difference from the MSTU account. Funding Source MSTU $213,152.73 Special Assessment $ 19.334.74 TOTAL $232,487.47 RECOMMENDATION Account No. 185-214-541-066.51 Account No. 111-244-541-03 5.51 It is recommended that the final assessment roll and the "As -Built Resolution" for the paving of the above mentioned road be approved by the Board of County Commissioners and that it be transferred to the Tax Collector for billing and collection. ATTACHMENTS 1) As -Built Resolution 2) Final Assessment Roll (Exhibit "A") 3) Final Costs November 10, 1998 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 98-125 certifying "as -built" costs for certain paving and drainage improvements to 101` Avenue from 79th Street to 87' Street, designated as project No. 9309, and other construction necessitated by such project; providing for formal completion date, and date for payment without penalty and interest. As -Built (Fourth Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 98- 12 5 3/25/97(ENG)RES4. MAG\ktp A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 101ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET, DESIGNATED AS PROJECT NO. 9309, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that the improvements described herein specially benefitted the property located within the boundaries as described in this title, designated as Project No. 9309, are in the public interest and promote the public welfare of the county; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 1997, the Board held a public hearing in the Commission Chambers at which time the owners of the property to be assessed were afforded an opportunity to appear before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted Resolution No. 97-56, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the property specially benefitted by the project in the amounts listed in an attachment to that resolution; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has certified the actual "as -built" cost now that the project has been completed is $2.00 per parcel, which is the same $2.00 per parcel in the confirming Resolution No. 97-56, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Resolution No. 97-56 is modified as follows: The completion date for Project No. 9309 is declared to be September 23, 1998, and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is ninety (90) days after passage of this resolution. November 10, 1998 67 BOOK 107 FADE bn BOOK 10 .7 PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 98-12 5 2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8'/z% per annum may be made in two equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12) months from the due date and the subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date. The due date is ninety (90) days after the passage of this resolution. 3. The assessment roll for said project listed in Resolution No. 97-56 shall be as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" to this resolution. 4. The assessments as shown in attached Exhibit "A" shall stand confirmed and remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid. 5. The assessments shown in Exhibit "A", attached to Resolution No.97-56 were recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall constitute prima facie evidence of its validity. This resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 10 dayof November .1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDT RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By. ,__ •''�` ' OHN W. TIPPIN��i' Attest: Y K. BARTO� 141� 1 Attachment: Exhibit "A" November 10, 1998 68 Indian RiverCounh• Approved Adminimmion nate i K/'ii Budget it, -oZ L'eJP1 /e 2y. Risk Mane , - Public Works ' r r FINAL COST FOR: 101ST AVENUE, 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET DATE: October 1, 1998 TOTAL F.F PROJECT NO. 9309 TOTAL L.F E NAL COST CONSTRUCTION Labor $52,205.84 $40,049.35 Equipment E $2,334.93 Asphalt Sod S14,717.62 $14,717.62 Pipe Limerock $45,011.19 Landfill $92.70 Tag $562.50 Concrete $951.26 Equipment Rental $248.60 Catch Basins $ Outside Labor 488.00 $82.16 $4 Box Tractor Work $1.64.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS: $210,7433.65 PFRO FEES $700.00 ROW ACQUISITION & TtTt F EARCH FEES N/A ENMEM G (Based on $2.59/L.F.) $2.59 X Administration 3% 2% Tax Collector's Fee (2% of Property Owners Assessmcnt) Recording Fees $2.00 per Front Foot to be assessed to Benefited Property O—ers Balance to be Paid by Other Revenue Services (MSTUD) 9,667.37 5,300.00 5,300 L.F. = SUB -TOTAL TOTAL $210,743.65 $700.00 $0.00 $13.727.00 $225,170.65 $6,755.12 $386.70 $175.00 $232,487.47 $19,334.74 $213,152.73 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 519,334.74 Assessment = $19.334.74 = $2.00 9667.37 9309COST.WK4 November 10, 1998 10/08/98 69 BOOK iu,7 F�4GE j � 0 z 0 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. � PROJECT NO. COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... NAME _& ADDRESS_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION__' FRO_N_T_F_OOTAGECOST/F.F _ __ 1. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00003-0070-00001.0 349.09 $2.00 Box 610727 N. Miami, FL 33160 2. Coolidge Corp. Box 610727 N. Miami, FL 33160 v 0 3. Coolidge Corp. Box 610727 N. Miami, FL 33160 4. Coolidge Corp. Box 610727 N. Miami, FL 33160 5. Raymond H. & Ruth Mary Burg 15701 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55343 93091'IN. WK4 Lots 1 to 4, Block G, Vero Lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 33-31-38-00003-0070-00005.0 Lots 5 to 8, Block G, Vero Lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 33-31-38-00003-0070-00009.0 Lots 9 to 12, Block G, Vero Lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 33-31-38-00003-0070-00013.0 Lots 13 to 16, Block G, Vero Lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 33-31-38-00003-0060-00017.0 Lot 17, Block F, Vero Lake Estates, Unit L 9,667.37 $19,334.74 $2.00 TOTAL COST $698.18 300.00 $2.00 $600.00 300.00 $2.00 $600.00 300.00 $2.00 $600.00 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 91. Cz 10/22/98 tip' o� rri SW z 0 e FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 PROJECT NO. 9309 PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 00COST NAME & ADDRESS _ _ _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 6. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00003-0060-00018.0 225.00 $2.00 $450.00 Box 610727 Lots 18, 19, 20, Block F, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 7. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00003-0060-00021.0 300.00 $2.00 $600.00 Box 610727 Lots 21 to 24, Block F, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 8. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00003-0060-00025.0 300.00 $2.00 $600.00 Box 610727 Lots 25 to 28, Block F, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 9. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00003-0060-00029.0 349.04 $2.00 $698.08 Box 610727 Lots 29 to 32, Block F, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero lake Estates, Unit L (OR BK 467 PP 534) 10. Lawrence W. & Brenda Young 33-31-38-00002-0070-00W1.0 88.86 $2.00 $177.72 8295 101st Avenue Lot 1, Block G, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 93091:IN. WK4 10/22/99 • 0 e FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET 0 TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 PROJECT NO. COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS................. $19,334.74 00 COST PER FRONT FOOT............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION -------- FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 1Timothy J. &Cynthia A. Sherman 33-31-38-00002-0070-00002.0— - --- — -- — -- --- 75.00 ----- _ ... - $2.00 - -- - - $150.00 8165 95th Avenue Lot 2, Block G, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K (OR BK 634 PP 2142) 12. Eric S. & Melinda W. Fisher 33-31-38-00002-0070-00003.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 2071 Misty Meadow Rd. Lot 3, Block G, N Finksburg, MD 21048 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 13, Bloomfield Construction Co. 33-31-38-00002-0070-00004.0 225.00 $2.00 $450.00 338 Cedarville Street Lots 4, 5 & 6, Block G, Pittsburg, PA 15224 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 14. Kerry A. & Loraine Heider 33-31-38-00002-0070-00007.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 3902 Dowling Avenue Lot 7, Block G, Wilkins Township, PA 15221 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K (OR BK 478 PP 32) 15. Michael E.& Lynn M.Baumgartner 33-31-38-00002-0070-00008.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 8205 101 st Avenue Lots 8 & 9, Block G, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 16- Nick & Jeanne Gazzola 33-31-38-00002-0070-00010.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 342 S Pacific Avenue Lot 10, Block G, Pittsburg, PA 15224 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 930911N. WK4 • 10/22/98 Li z 0 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS csr TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET 0 TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 w COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 w 00 PROJECT NO. 9309 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 17. Michael & Linda M. Galley 33-31-38-00002-0070-00011.0 75.00 $2.00 $1.50.00 8165 101 st Avenue Lot 11, Block G, Sebastian, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 18. Ann E. Brack 33-31-38-00002-0070-00012.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 117 Royal Palm Street Lot 12, Block G, v Sebastian, FL 32958 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K w 19. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00002-0070-00013.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 Box 610727 Lots 13 & 14, Block G, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K (OR BK 467 PP 534) 20. William W. & April A. Moolenaar 33-31-38-00002-0070-00015.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 8115 101st Avenue Lot 15, Block G, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 21. William W. & April A. Moolenaar 33-31-38-00002-0070-00016.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 8115 101 st Avenue Lot 16, Block G, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 0 22. Nicholas & Gilda Addesa 33-31-38-00002-0060-00017.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 370 S Waverly Place, Apt. 4-C Lots 17 & 18, Block F, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 93091:IN. WK4 10/22/99 c� M L J z 0 e FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET 0 TO 87TH STREET TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 PROJECT N0.9309 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 23. Sanfra Lynn Key 33-31-38-00002-0060-00019.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 8136 101 st Avenue Lot 19, Block F, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 24. Harry& Lillian Greenberg 33-31-38-00002-0060-00020.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 11734 Folkstone Lane Lot 20, Block F, Los Angeles, CA 90077 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 25. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00002-0060-00021.0 300.00 $2.00 $600.00 Box 610727 Lots 21 to 24, Block F, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 26. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00002-0060-00025.0 300.00 $2.00 $600.00 Box 610727 Lots 25 to 28, Block F, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 27. Joseph & Julia D. Kosich 33-31-38-00002-0060-00029.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 6715 Tuxedo Road Lot 29, Block F, San Diego, CA 92119 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 28. Glenn E. & Dorothy L. Ferrall 33-31-38-00002-0060-00030.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 2509 Bordeaux Way Lot 30, Block F, Lutz, FL 33549 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 9309FIN.WK4 • 10/22/)8 z 0 e o, FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 �O PROJECT NO. 9309 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 29. Mary Ann Rannou 33-31-38-00002-0060-00031.0 163.93 $2.00 $327.86 8276 101 st Avenue Lots 31 & 32, Block F, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K Plat Book 5, Page 83 30. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00001-0140-00001.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 Box 610727 Lot 1, Block N, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J t� (OR BK 467 PP 534) 31. Ann Vignovich 33-31-38-00001-0140-00002.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 2311 West Wade Street Lots 2 & 3, Block N, Aliquippa, PA 15001 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 32. Bertie Dibble 33-31-38-00001-0140-00004.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 RR 1 Box 1059 Lot 4, Block N, Three Springs, PA 17264 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 33. Regis H. & Margaret E. Ryan 33-31-38-00001-0140-00005.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 P.O. Box 614 Lots 5 & 6, Block N, Rockledge, FL 32956-0 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J Q, 34- Paul K. Solt 33-31-38-00001-0140-00007.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 Cz Cz 2299 Hoffer Avenue Lots 7 & 8, Block N, Laureldlae, PA 19605 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 93091 -' IN. WK4 10/22/9x :Y p^CI ,, • �-0dj NAME & ADDRESS 35. Collidge Corp. Box 610727 N. Miami, FL 33160 36. W. Ray & Anne G. Laseter v 1038 Ray Wyatt Road Ashville, AL 35953 37. Charlotte A. & John D. Cole, Jr. 8455 101st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32967 38. Joseph Sortino c/o Florence Wolfling 475 Center Street East Aurora, NY 14052 39. Raymond C. & Julia C. Raub 1501 SW Edinburg Drive Pt. St. Lucie, FL 34953 93091IN. WK4 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION 33-31-38-00001-0130-00001.0 Lot I, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J (OR BK 467 PP 534) 33-31-38-00001-0130-00002.0 Lot 2, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 33-31-38-00001-0130-00003.0 Lot 3, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 33-31-38-00001-0130-00004.0 Lot 4, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 33-31-38-00001-0130-00005.0 Lot 5, Block M, Vero lake Estates, Unit J (OR BK 153 PP 384) FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 131.74 $2.00 $263.48 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 75.00 0 $150.00 �D FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $150.00 TO: 101ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET 0 0-1 TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 �O COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 PROJECT N0.9309 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS 35. Collidge Corp. Box 610727 N. Miami, FL 33160 36. W. Ray & Anne G. Laseter v 1038 Ray Wyatt Road Ashville, AL 35953 37. Charlotte A. & John D. Cole, Jr. 8455 101st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32967 38. Joseph Sortino c/o Florence Wolfling 475 Center Street East Aurora, NY 14052 39. Raymond C. & Julia C. Raub 1501 SW Edinburg Drive Pt. St. Lucie, FL 34953 93091IN. WK4 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION 33-31-38-00001-0130-00001.0 Lot I, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J (OR BK 467 PP 534) 33-31-38-00001-0130-00002.0 Lot 2, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 33-31-38-00001-0130-00003.0 Lot 3, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 33-31-38-00001-0130-00004.0 Lot 4, Block M, Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 33-31-38-00001-0130-00005.0 Lot 5, Block M, Vero lake Estates, Unit J (OR BK 153 PP 384) FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 131.74 $2.00 $263.48 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 10/22/98 -2 rn m 0 CD Co 93091 1 N. WK4 10122198 • z 0 e e� c FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET 0 TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 00 PROJECT NO. 9309 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 40. Madeline Nistico 33-31-38-00001-0130-00006.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 552 Third Street Lots 6 & 7, Block M, Clairton, PA 15025 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 41. Coolidge Corp. 33-31-38-00001-0110-00009.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 Box 610727 Lots 9 & 12, Block K, v v N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J (OK BK 467 PP 534) 42. George E. Petticrew, Jr. 33-31-38-00001-0110-00010.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 8326 101 st Avenue Lot 10, Block K, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit K 43. Mary Agnes Martin (Dec.) 33-31-38-00001-0110-00011.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 c/o Eleanor Schachern, Executor Lot 11, Block K, 2421 Front Street Vero Lake Estates, Unit J Monica, PA 15061 44. Rita Hudmon 33-31-38-00001-0110-00013.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 8360 101st Avenue Lot 13, Block K, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 93091 1 N. WK4 10122198 • 9309FIN. WK4 • 1027/99 0 C c FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET 0 TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 00 PROJECT NO. 9309 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME &ADDRESS 45. Rita F. Hudmon33-31-38-00001-0110-00014.0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE _ _ ._ -_ - COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 8360 101st Avenue - 1-38-00001-0110-00014.0 Lot 14, Block K, 75.00 00 $2 . $150.00 Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 46. Collidse Corp. 33-31-38-00001-0110-00015.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 Box 610727 Lots 15 & 16, Block K, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 0000 (OK BK 467 PP 534) 47. Collidse Corp. 33-31-38-00001-0120-00008.0 225.00 $2.00 $450.00 Box 610727 Lots 8 to 10, Block L, N. Miami, FL 33160 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J (OK BK 467 PP 53) 48. Marvin & Gayle Reaume 33-31-38-00001-0130-00011.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 13520 NW 4th Manor Lot 11, Block L, Plantation, FL 33325 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 49. Tommy J. & Jean Runion 33-31-38-00001-0120-00012.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 1713 Linwood Avenue Lot 12, Block L, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 50. Tommy J. & Jean Runion 33-31-38-00001-0120-00013.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 1713 Linwood Avenue Lot 13, Block L, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Vero Lake Estates, Unit J 9309FIN. WK4 • 1027/99 0 C:1 cIt rn WE 0 e B FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS o TO: I O I ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 00 PROJECT NO. 9309 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/FT. TOTAL COST 51. Michael K. & Nina E. Neady 33-31-38-00001-0120-00014.0 131.56 $2.00 $263.12 3902 74th Avenue Lot 14, Block L, Hyattsville, MD 20784 Vero Lake Esates, Unit J 52. Kathleen L. Craig 28-31-38-00006-0140-00001.0 71.00 $2.00 $142.00 v 4250 Sardis Road Lot 1, Block N, �o Murrysville, PA 15668 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 53. Ernest G.& Christin Gerber,lll 28-31-38-00006-0140-00002.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 8575 101 st Avenue Lots 2, Block N Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 54. John Lloyd 28-31-38-00006-0140-00006.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 9432 U.S. Highway I Lots 3, Block N Sebastian, FL 32958 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 55. Fred Anderson 28-31-38-00006-0140-00004.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 1001 Foster Road Lot 4, Block N, Sebastian, FL 32958 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 56. Joseph & Gertrude Blood 28-31-38-00006-0140-00005.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 8545 101st Avenue Lot 5, Block N, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 93091'IN. WK4 10/22N)x K-1 93091IN. WK4 10/22/98 E" 0 0 _I 0 e FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET 0 TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 PROJECT N0.9309 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 t�0 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME &ADDRESS 7. Southern Bell T & T Co. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE 28-31-38-00006-0140-00006.0 COST/F.F. TOTAL COST c/o Bellsouth Room 5E03 Campanile 75.00 Lot 6, Block N, $2.00 $150.00 1155 Peachtree Street NE Vero Lake Estates, Unit I Atlanta, FL 30367-6 (OR BK 721 PP 1444) 58. David W. & Delia Badders 28-31-38-00006-0140-00007.0 146.00 $2.00 11146 Del Rio Road Lots 7 & 8, Block N, $292.00 Spring Valley, CA 91978 Vero Lake Estates, Unit I o (OR BK 495 PP 747) 59. Stuart E. & Lucille Glover 28-31-38-00006-0130-00001.0 77.07 $2.00 10101 87th Street Lot 1, Block M, $154.14 Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 60. Patricia L. Carey 8675 101st Avenue 28-31-38-00006-0130-00002.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 Lot 2, Block 7, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Vero Lake Estates, Unit I (OR BK 484 PP 706) 61. Virginia & Raymond Taylor, Jr. 28-31-38-00006-0130-00003.0 150.00 $2.00 1076 Great Road Lots 3 & 4, Block M, $300.OU Lincoln, RI 02865 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 93091IN. WK4 10/22/98 E" 0 0 _I 00 V-7 0 4 OEM il C.171 - U0 a z 0 e FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: MIST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET 0 TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 1%0 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 00 PROJECT NO. 9309 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 62. Edmund N. Ansm, Trustee 28-31-38-0006-130-00005.0 225.00 $2.00 $450.00 1401 79th Street Causeway Lots 5 to 7, Block M, Miami, FL 33141 Vero Lake Estates, Unit I (OR BK 467 PP 485) 63. Alexandra A. & Anasta Alexander 28-31-38-00006-0130-00008.0 70.00 $2.00 $140.00 328 Granada Parkway Lots 8 & 9, Block M, Lindenhurst, NY 11757 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 64. Donald Paul & Maria Ricc Zappa 28-31-38-00006-0110-00009.0 71.00 $2.00 $142.00 224 S Evaline Street Lot 9, Block K, Pittsburg;, PA 15224 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 65. Frank S.& Susan Ernst 28-31-38-00006-0110-00010.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 15713 Davis Cup Lane Lot 10, Block K, Ramona, CA 92065 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 66. Karol Poderski 28-31-38-00006-0110-00011.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 1625 Martin Hwy. #714 Lot 11, Block K, Palm City, FL 34990 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 67. Edmund N. Ansin, Trustee 28-31-38-00006-0110-00012.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 1401 79th Street Causeway Lot 12, Block K, Miami, FL 33141 Vero Lake Estates, Unit I (OR BK 467 PP 485) 9309FIN. WK4 10U22/9R • • z 0 e FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET o ►—` TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 00 PROJECT NO. 9309 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 68. Harold & Rose Borrelli 28-31-38-00006-0110-00013.0 150.00 $2.00 $300.00 66 Parsonage Hill Road Lots 13 & 14, Block K, Northford, CT 06472 Vero Lake Estates, Unit I 69. John H. Francisco 28-31-38-00006-0110-00015.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 Houston Paving Co. Lot 15, Block K, O0 N 80 Houston Road Vero Lake Estates, Unit I Little Falls, NJ 07424 70. Wanda Lepien 28-31-38-00006-0110-00016.0 71.00 $2.00 $142.00 107 McGregor Street Lot 16, Block K, Harligen, TX 78550 Vero Lake Estates, Unit I (OR BK 414 PP 240) 71. George Lins 28-31-38-00006-0120-00009.0 145.00 $2.00 $290.00 P.O. Box 266 Lots 9 & 10, Block L, Brielle, NJ 08730 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 72. Ronald & Joan Ciccozzi 28-31-38-00006-0120-00011.0 75.00 $2.00 $150.00 120 Heather Drive Lot 11, Block L, Monaca, PA 15061 Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 0 cm 9.3091 -- IN. WK4 10l22l99 w m 00 w rn z FRONTFOOTAGE 0 c __ 75.00 Lot 12, Block L, TOTAL COS' Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 28-31-38-00006-0120-00013.0 TO: 101 ST AVENUE FROM 79TH 0 STREET TO 87TH STREET Vero Lake Estates, Unit I TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 9,667.37 00 PROJECT NO. COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $19,334.74 28-31-38-00006-0120-00015.0 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............... $2.00 .NAME & ADDRESS 73. Orval B. &Marjorie O. Archer 2799 Wright Avenue SE Palm Bay, FL 32909 74. Maggie L. McDaniel 8666 101 st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32967 75. Thomas H. & Donna S. Sherrod Rt. 1 Box 107-N Lake City, FL 32055 9309FIN WK4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONTFOOTAGE 28-31-38-00006-0120-00012.0 __ 75.00 Lot 12, Block L, TOTAL COS' Vero Lake Estates, Unit 1 28-31-38-00006-0120-00013.0 150.00 Lots 13 & 14, Block L, Vero Lake Estates, Unit I (OK BK 440 PP 913) 28-31-38-00006-0120-00015.0 152.08 Lots 15 & 16, Block L, Vero Lake Estates, Unit I TOTAL 9,667.37 FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST -- --- — $2.00- -- -- - --- —_ $150.00 $2.00 $300.00 $2.00 $304.16 $2.00 $19,334.74 COST PER F.F. TOTAL COS' 10/22/98 • BOOK l➢. 7 FA.Gt 11.G.2. RESOLUTIONS NO. 98-126 AND 98-127- PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO AIRPORT DRIVE AND HART AVENUE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB INSEBASTIAN, FLORIDA. IN ROSELAND GARDENS SUBDIVISION (RESOLUTIONS I AND II) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1998: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CET Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to and set Public Hearing date for: PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D - IRC PROJECT NO. 9811 DATE: October 28, 1998 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County Public Works Department and the Developer for Collier Club have initiated a public improvement assessment for road paving and drainage improvements for the following: PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D A providing resolution is presented for adoption by the Board. The total cost for these improvements is $40,758.84. The Developer of Collier Club will pay $19,881.91, which amounts to approximately 50% of the total cost for these improvements. The property owners, who abut Airport Drive and Hart Avenue in the Roseland Gardens Subdivision will be assessed $20,876.92, which is 50% of the total cost and includes administrative and tax collector fees. A separate resolution is presented for adoption to hold a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner. This Public Hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, December 1, 1998 at 9:05 A.M. in the County Commission Chambers. An assessment roll and plat has been prepared and filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. November 10, 1998 84 RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING It is recommended that the Board: 1) Adopt the resolution providing for the paving and drainage improvements for the projects subject to the terms outlined in the resolution. The applicable interest rate shall be established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time the final assessment roll is approved. 2) Allocate $20,876.92 from the Petition Paving Account #111-214-541-035.39. 3) Adopt a resolution setting the time and place of the Public Hearing. ATTACHMENTS 1) Providing Resolution for Paving and Drainage 2) Setting Resolution for Public Hearing 3) Cost Estimate 4) Assessment Roll and Assessment Plat ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 98-126 providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to Airport Drive and Hart Avenue adjacent to Collier Club in Sebastian, Florida, in Roseland Gardens Subdivision, providing the total estimated cost, method of payment of assessments, number of annual installments, and legal description of the area specifically benefitted. Providing (First Reso.) RESOLUTION NO.98-�_ 3/25/97(ENG)RES 1.MAG\ktp A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE "ROVEMENTS TO AIRPORT DRIVE AND HART AVENUE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D, PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED. WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department and the Developer for Collier Club have initiated a public improvement for Airport Drive adjacent to the Collier Club in Sebastian, Florida in Roseland Gardens SID. WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Chapter 206, Section 206.01 through 206.09, Indian River November 10, 1998 85 BOOK DPAGE BOOK 107 PAGES No. 98- 12 6 County Code, and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls have been completed by the Public Works Department; and the total estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is FORTY THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY EIGHT DOLLARS AND EIGHTY THREE CENTS ($40,758.83); and WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall, for any given record owner of property within the area specially benefitted, be in an amount equal to that proportion of fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of the project ($20,876.92) which the number of lineal feet of road frontage owned by the given owner bears to the total number of lineal feet of road frontage within the areas specially benefitted and fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of the project ($19,881.91) will come from the Developer for Collier Club. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefitted thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments; and WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and payable at the Office of the Tax Collector of Indian River County ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special assessment pursuant to Section 206.08, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12) months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly; and WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the following described properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these improvement, to wit: Lots 3 through 12 in Block 2; and Lots 1 through 7 in Block 3, all shown on a plat of Roseland Gardens filed in Plat Book 8, Page 25 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Lying in Indian River County, Florida. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety. 2. A project providing for paving and drainage improvements to Airport Drive adjacent to Collier Club in Sebastian, Florida in Roseland Gardens S/D; heretofore designated as Public Works Project No. 9811 is hereby approved subject to the terms outlined above and all applicable requirements of Chapter 206, et seq. Indian River County Code. November 10, 1998 86 • No. 98- 12 6 The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Eggert who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: day of Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Vice -Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Carolyn Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this gyp__ November , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA J© TIPP , an Attest: JEFF. BARTON Clerk ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 98-127 setting a time an place at which the owners of property on Airport Drive and Hart Avenue adjacent to Collier Club in Sebastian, Florida, in Roseland Gardens Subdivision and other interested persons may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements to said property as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property benefitted thereby. November 10, 1998 87 • BOOK 107 r, BOOK 10.1_ mu :8 7 Time and Place (Second Reso.) 3/25/97(ENG)RES2.MAG\ktp RESOLUTION NO. 98- 12 7 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON AIRPORT DRIVE AND HART AVENUE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PROPERTY AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITTED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 9 8 = i 2 6, determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described herein, that paving and drainage improvements be made to said property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements to said property, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefitted thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 A.M. on Tuesday. December l 1998, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard to said property. The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefitted are more particularly described' upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. November 10, 1998 88 RESOLUTION NO. 98--4-2� 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefitted may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the -plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8:30 A.M. until 5:00 P.M. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by the Department of Public Works by two publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a week apart. The last Publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Public Works shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner F S g e r t and the motion was seconded by Commissioner A d a m ,and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 10 day of November 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: � JOHN W. TIP ,Chairman JeffreyK.=Bait , Clerk ^� L) �r V Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL November 10, 1998 89 X .r BOOK 107 PAGE I -A8 r� 9811 PRE. WK4 0 10/28/98 cza 0 0 M �1 17) rn rn PIZE'LIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STO: Cr AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, 0 FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT O TOTAL FRONT FEET ................................... 1,427.97 PROJECT NO. 9811 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $20,876.92 �O COST PER FRONT FOOT ............................. $14.62 00 NAME & ADDRESSFRONT LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. ASSESSMENT SSSS - TOTAL COST - - --- - - -- - SSSS— — — COST Denny R. I lendq I 1-3I-38-01x)03-(x)20-0(xx)3.0 62.97 P.O. 13o.N 98 $14.62 $920.62 -- -- -- - - COST $920.62 Lot 3,13hack 2, Roseland Gardens S/D Roseland, FL 32957 2. Denny R. I lendry I 1 -31 -38 -(1(1(x)3 -(x)20 -00(x)4.0 93.70 $14.62 $1,369.89 RUBox 98 Roseland $1,369.89 Gardens S/D, Lot 4, lilcx;k 2. Loss liillowing Roseland, FI. 32957 described parcel: Begin at NWly corner of Lot 5, Block �10 2, run N 44 deg 22 min 00 sec W along Nly line of Lot 4, C) 6.30', thence: run S 27 deg 50 min 50 six; W, parallel with lot line between albresaid Lois 4 & 5 136.14' to a curve concave SWly, having a radius 338.75'& through which a radial line bears N 36 deg 08 min 58 sec li, thence run SEIy along the arc of said curve 6.07', through a central angle ol'01 deg 01 min 37 see, thence run N 27 deg 50 min 50 see E along the Wly line said Lot 5,135.14* to Point of Beginning (OR 13c)ok 7601'1' 861) 9811 PRE. WK4 0 10/28/98 cza 0 0 M �1 17) rn rn z 0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT C TOTAL FRONT FEET ................................... 1,427.97 I� COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $20,876.92 00 PROJECT NO. 9811 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............................. $14.62 FRONT ASSESSMENT NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST COST 3. Edward W. Arens, Sr. I1-31-38-0(=340)20-00005.0 116.30 $14.62 $1,700.31 $1,700.31 1034 Rose Arbor Drive Roseland Gardens S/1),111318-25. Lot 5,13lock 2 & that Scbaslian. FI. 32958 part of Lot 4, Block 2 described as follows: Beginning at NWly airner Lot 5, Block 2, nm N 44 deg 22 min 00 sec W along Nly line of Lot 4,6.30', then nm S 27 deg, 50 min 50 see W parallel with lot line between aforesaid Lots 4 & 5, 136.14' to a curve concave SWly having a radius of 338.75'& through which a radial line bears N 36 deg i-- 08 min 58 sc a E, then run SGIy along arc of said curve 6.07', through a central angle oft) I deg 01 min 37 wc, then run N 27 deg 50 min 50 sex: G along W ly line of said Lot 5, 135.14' to Point of Beginning. 4. I lerbLil & Kathleen Severance It -31-38-00003-0020-(X)000.0 80 $14.62 $1,169.60 $1,169.60 3556 Lucia Drive Roseland Gardens S/1), PI318-25, Lot 6.131ock 2 Vero Mach, FI. 32967 5. 1 lerlwrt & Kathken Severance 1 1 -31 -38 -0(X)03 -0020-0(X)07.0 80 $14.62 $1,169.60 $1,169.60 3556 Lucia Drive Roseland Gardens SA), 111318-25, Lot 7, Block 2 Vero Beach, Fl. 32967 6. I lerbert & KathILLn Severance 11 -3I-38-(XXX)3-(X120-00X)8.0 80 $14.62 $1,169.60 $1,169.60 VTF 3556 Lucia Drive Roseland Gardens S/1), PBI 8-25, Lot 8, Block 2 ?e Vero Beach, FL 32967 A 9811 PRE.WK4 C-7) m �� 10/28/98 • • � 0 z 0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, �► FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT J TOTAL FRONT FEET ................................... COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. PROJECT NO. 9811 COST PER FRONT FOOT 00 ............................. FRONT NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST 7. 1lerbert & Kalhlcen Severance 11-31-38-00003-0020-(()(1)9.0 80 $14.62 $1,169.60 3556 Lucia (hive Roseland Gardens 8/1),1'1318-25, l.ot 9, Block 2 Vero Beach, FL 32967 8. I lerbert & Kathleen Severance 11 -3I-38-O(x103-(H)20-0(9)10.0 80 $14.62 $1,169.60 3556 Lucia Drive Roseland Gardens S/1),111318-25, IA)t 10, Block 2 Veru Beach, FL 32067 N 9. 1 id & Fleanore 0. I lerder I 1-31-38-0(x)03-(()20-0(()11.0 80 $14.62 $1,169.60 11.0 Bos 397 Roseland Gardens %A), I)B18-25, Lot 11, Block 2 Roseland, 11, 32957 10. Ed&Iileaune0.1lerder II -31-38-00003-()020-0(1)12,0 100 $14.62 $1,462.00 1).0. Box 397 Roseland Gardens S/D, PB18-25, lot 12,131ock 2 Ru,eland,1.1 32957 11. I inma M. Decker 11-31-38-0()003-0030-0(((11.0 100 $14.62 $1,462.00 7 Oak Point Drive South Roseland Gardens SA), PBI 8-25, Lot I & NWIy 10' Bayville, NY 11709 of I.ot 2, Block 3 12. I lerbeii & Kuthluen Severance I I-31-38-00003-0030-(1)002.0 110 $14.62 $1,608.20 1113 5 Airport Drive Roseland Gardens S/1), PBI 8-25, I of 2 Less NWIy Sebastian, Fl. 32958 10' & W 1/3 I of 3,13lock 3 9811 PRE.WK4 :71 1,427.97 $20,876.92 $14.62 ASSESSMENT COST $1,169.60 $1,169.60 $1,169.60 $1,462.00 $1,462.00 $1,608.20 1 WNW 0 a m rn 0 0 -'c 11r —v 3 G7 rn 9811 PRE.WK4 1,427.97 $14.62 20,876.92 20,876.92 T 07AL FRONT COST PER F. F. TOTAL COST T OTAL ASSESSMEN7 FOOTAGE 1028/98 • z 0 19 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, c FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT ~ TOTAL FRONT FEET ................................... 1,427.97 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $20,876.92 PROJECT NO. 9811 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............................. $14.62 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST ASSESSMENT COST 13. 1lerhul & Kathleen Severance 11-31-38-(x1003-0030-0(1003.0 120 $14.62 $1,754.40 $1,754.40 3556 Lucia Drive Roseland Gardens S/1), 111318-25, Is 1/2 Lot 3 and all Veru (leach. PI. 32967 Lot 4,13lock 3 14. I lerber(& Kathleen Severance 11-31-38-00003-0030-0(XX)5.0 120 $14.62 $1,754.40 $1,754.40 3556 Lucia Drive Roseland Gardens S/D, P131 8-25, IA 5 & NW 1/2 Vero Beach, IA. 32967 of Lot 6,13lock 3 15. Prida Russ I I-31-38-(XX)03-(x)30-0(x)06.0 125 $14.62 $1,827.50 $1,827.50 11107 Airport Drive Roseland Gardens S/D, P1318-25, Slily 1/2 of Lot 6 Sebastian, I.1. 32958 & all of Lot 7, Block 3 9811 PRE.WK4 1,427.97 $14.62 20,876.92 20,876.92 T 07AL FRONT COST PER F. F. TOTAL COST T OTAL ASSESSMEN7 FOOTAGE 1028/98 • • K • 2 s 2� s BLOCK 1 3 2 s� \qti ;AVALLO ; � N, �2. , 3 , 9�� 770, 4 0 8 �s \ HENDRY ,6 7 o PENDLETON 8 o ARENS 9 8p• q \ SEVERANCE 10 80' HERDER , 12 o � �- 'P� 50' ROSELAND GARDENS �SD ASSESSMENT PLA T CL UB 100' OF 60' , �16' PAV'T DECKER -SEVER NCEy-� ROS 7 / 02 CM 11.G.3. AGRICULTURAL ARENA BUILDING (FAIRGROUNDS) - SECOND GRANT FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES - CONTRACT #4617 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 3, 1998: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director: SUBJECT: Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services - Second Grant for Agricultural Arena Building - Contract # 4617 DATE: November 3, 1998 On October 7, 1997, the Board approved accepting a $159,000 grant from the State of Florida to construct an Agricultural Arena/Exhibit building at the Fairgrounds. A second grant in the amount of $200,000 has been received this year. The attached second project agreement formally establishes the same grant conditions as the first agreement which include the following: 1) The County will provide for construction of the building, following applicable labor laws and state procedure. 2) Grant eligible costs are design, permitting, impact fees, site work, and building construction. 3) Proper documentation of costs are to be maintained by the County 4) The building should be constructed as soon as possible, but no specific time of completion is specified. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the second agreement and has no objections to its content. The following alternatives are presented: Alternative No 1 Approve the second agreement and authorize the Chairman's signature. ,Alternative ATS 2 Deny approval. ATTACMUMT RECOIRIENDATIONS AND FUNDING Referenced letter & Agreements_ Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. November 10, 1998 95 BOOK 10.7 PAGE � FP - BOOK 107 PAGE 55 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the second project agreement with Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Disbursements of Appropriated Funds, and authorized the Chairman's signature on same, as recommended in the Memorandum. CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.4. EMERGENCY BEACH ITEM - SAND SCRAPING (HEARD WITH ITEM 7.G.) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 9, 1998 and a Memorandum of October 28, 1998 (Item 7.G.): TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Commissioner Fran B. Adams DATE: November 9, 1998 This is a request to do an emergency permit on the North Beach area for sand scraping. The area would be determined after final analysis by Jeff Tabar, County Coastal Engineer, and is to be done within the next 30 days. DATE: October 28, 1998 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: Janes E. Chandler, County Administrator .1 1 H.T. "Sonny" Dean, General Services Ir�re�o�J FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal BACKGROUND: The following list of equipment list has been declared surplus to the needs of the County. November 10, 1998 M. it 0 • DEPT ASSET NO DESCRIPTION SWDD 13624 1991 Caterpillar 966F Wheel Loader General Services 7885 Telephone Switching Boxes ANALYSIS: Staff recommends that authority be granted by the Board of County Commissioners to declare these items surplus and authorize its sale and/or proper disposal. I�i1�l� I. e3i The monies received from this sale will be returned to the appropriate accounts. RECOMMENDATION: This list of surplus items will be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of Florida State Statutes. Commissioner Adams advised that due to recent extensive beach erosion caused by Tropical Storm Mitch, which resulted in 25-30' beach loss, our parks are in danger as well as homes along the 22 mile coastline of Indian River County. She pointed out that October and November are the worst months for beach erosion and requested the Board give staff some latitude in the pursuit of the solution; the State of Florida much prefers beach scraping to sea walls. Staff feels that beach scraping may prevent additional requests for sea walls. Commissioner Adams requested that the Board consider an emergency permit for beach scraping and allow Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar and Public Works Director James Davis to set out the area where the scraping is necessary and come back to the Board with some cost estimates. Then Commissioner Adams explained why she had asked that item 7.G. be heard together with this beach scraping request. One of the items to be declared surplus is a 1991 Caterpillar 966F Wheel Loader (a front-end loader from Landfill), which still runs and may be able to be used for beach scraping to avoid using other equipment. Commissioner Adams also requested the Board to surplus the loader (described in item 7.G. memorandum) to Public Works so that, if needed, it would be available. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, and SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Macht to approve both of Commissioner Adams' above requests. November 10, 1998 M • BOOK 10.7 PAGE 5.. BOOK 10-7 PAVE' Under discussion, Commissioners questioned why a 1991 loader was being surplussed and Administrator Chandler explained that some of the equipment at the Landfill is no longer needed because of privatization. Budget Director Joseph A. Baird added that the loader had been fully depreciated with a zero book value. Public Works Director James Davis was relieved to learn it was an old Landfill loader and not one assigned to Road and Bridge. The life of their 11 -year old dozer would surely be shortened by using it on the beach. He assumed this authorization would include some funding to pay operators and other costs. Commissioner Adams stated that funding should come from the beach funds and staff should come back to the Board with cost estimates, particularly for the beaches on private property, for which the property owners should pay. Approval by the Board today would give staff the direction to lay out the program and be ready to go with the work when finally approved by the Board at the next meeting. Director Davis advised that Mr. Tabar has checked the State's rule on emergency protection and there are certain limits on beach scraping. Because of the provisions in the rules, he recommended the areas be prioritized. Vice Chairman Macht pointed out that this is a problem for everyone in the county. General Services Director H.T. "Sonny" Dean requested that the motion include surplus of the telephone switching boxes, the other item on 7.G. MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Macht to include the surplus of the telephone switching boxes as set forth in the Memorandum under item 7.G. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. November 10, 1998 98 11.H.1. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT MASTER PLANNING SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ADVERTISING APPROVED The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 1998: DATE: OCTOBER 28,1998 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. ' DIRECTOR OF UTII..ITY S PREPARED WILLIAM F. McCAIN, AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT tMITY SERVICES SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR MASTER PLANNING SERVICES - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. MP -78 -14 -ST BACKGROUND In 1993, the firm of Brown and Caldwell completed a Water and Wastewater Utility Master Plan which extended through the year 2010. Since that time, numerous section updates have been performed, (Le., North Beach Water and Wastewater, (North County Master Plan update, South County Master Plan update, etc.). The state and county planning horizons are now being extended to the year 2020. Therefore, the Utilities Department must not only compile all previous efforts but extend the planning horizon as well. Staff is now proposing to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Master Planning Services. Please reference the attached proposal for details. ANALYSIS A general description of the scope of consulting services is as follows: 1. Integrate the existing 1993 Master Plan by Brown and Caldwell with all existing service area updates since 1993. 2. Review for update: a) corridor analysis b) regulatory constraints implemented since previous plans completed c) review time apd trigger events for capital project impation d) capital costs to reflect 1997/1998 costs e) land use changes/population projections 3. Extend the planning horizon from 2010 to 2020. 4. Impact of thre implementation of wetland/reuse effluent disposal system November 10, 1998 BOOK 107 PAGE 593 r 'OOK 5. Review of sludge facility and analysis of ultimate disposal/utilization options; Le., composting with yard waste. etc. 6. Other planning services as assigned, for a period of five (5) years. Funding for this project wM be from Account No. 471-000-169-146.00. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Why Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize advertisement of the proposed RFP and to proceed with the consultant selection process. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized advertisement of the proposed RFP for (utilities) master planning services for integrating the existing 1993 Master Plan by Brown and Caldwell with all existing service area updates since 1993 and other services as set forth in the Memorandum, and proceed with the consultant selection process, as recommended in the Memorandum. 11.H.2. HALLMARK HOMES SUBDIVISION -PETITION SEWER SERVICE (26TH AVENUE, SOUTH OF 8TH STREET) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 2, 1998: DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 1998 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR J FROM: DONALD R. HU BS, P.E. DIRECTOR OF UTILITY CES PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS AND STAFFED MANAGER OF A ENT PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: HALLMARK HOMES SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER SERVICE (26= AVENUE SOUTH OF S= STREET) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -98 -18 -CS November 10, 1998 100 BACKGROUND A petition has been received from the residents of Hallmark Homes (26th Avenue) requesting the County to supply sewer service to the residents. We are now coming before the Board of County Commissioners to seek approval to begin design of the above-mentioned project. (See attached petition, plat map, and letter from petitioners.) ANALYSIS There are 33 homes (on 34 lots); 2 of the owners own 1.5 lots. There are no vacant lots. Of the 33 owners, 21 (or 64%) have signed the attached petition in support of proceeding with the installation of a sanitary sewer system. In 1992 this subdivision received County water in a petition -driven water assessment project. Twenty-one (64%) of the water assessments have been paid off; twenty-six (or 79%) of the homes are now connected to the County's water system. Twenty-eight (or 85%) of the homes are owner -occupied. Attached are letters from M. J. Galanis, Environmental Health Director, agreeing that this neighborhood warrants public sewerage and should be a high priority. A letter from the Lynn residents, owners who live on 26th Avenue, expressing concerns and problems they have experienced over the past twenty years is also attached, together with letters from two owners objecting to the proposed project. Typical lot sizes are .17 to .19 acre and are undersized" as defined in Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan. (See attached schedule of parcels, lot sizes, and map, which displays the area to benefit from the assessment project.) This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed sewer line route. In the interim, financing will be from the assessment fund. Design service will be provided by the Department of Utility Services. Based on our proposed survey for the project, the most cost effective method of providing sewer service will be determined prior to commencement of design. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the above - listed project and requests authorization for the Department to proceed with the design engineering work and award a contract for survey services through the issuance of a purchase order based on the most favorable quote in preparation for the special assessment project. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the Hallmark Homes Subdivision Petition Sewer Service, Project No. US -98 -18 -CS, and authorized the Department to proceed with the design engineering work and award a contract for survey services through the issuance of a purchase order based on the most favorable quote in preparation for the special assessment project, as recommended in the Memorandum. November 10, 1998 101 BOOK 107 PAGE BOOK 107 FACE 601 11.H.3. WESTGATE COLONY SUBDIVISION -PETITION SEWER SERVICE (79TH AND 80TH AVENUES, 79TH COURT AND 21ST STREET, NORTH OF SR 60) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 2, 1998: DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 1998 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. 1 DIRECTOR OF UTILITY \ E PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASS SS PROJECTS 9 BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: WESTGATE COLONY SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER SERVICE (79= AND 80= AVENUES, 79= COURT AND 21'rr STREET, NORTH OF STATE ROAD 60) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -98 -19 -CS BACKGROUND A petition has been received from the residents of Westgate Colony requesting the County to supply sewer service to the residents. We are now coming before the Board of County Commissioners to seek approval to begin design of the above-mentioned project. (See attached petition and plat map.) ANALYSIS This subdivision consists of 79 lots (72 Parcel IDs). Eight of the owners own 1.5 or 2 lots. One non-resident owner owns two investment rental houses, and there are five vacant lots. The 44 signatures on the attached petition represent ownership of 47 lots, which is 69% of the subdivision's 68 homes (59% of the 79 lots and 61% of the total square footage to be assessed). The attached copy of the petitioner's letter dated March 23, 1998 explains several concerns, among which are: 1. Many of the homes are experiencing problems with their septic systems. 2. Three of the property owners have recently had to replace their septic systems within the previous six-month period with costly, unattractive, elevated, mounded above -ground -level systems. 3. The negative effect of such above -ground systems on their property values. Typical lot sizes are .21 acre and are undersized" as defined in Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan. This subdivision received County water service in the Phase III Water Expansion Project. The final assessment for that project was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on August 10, 1994. Seventy-nine percent of the water assessments have been paid in full. (See attached schedule of parcels, lot sizes, and map, which displays the area to benefit from the assessment project.) This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed sewer line route. In the interim, financing will be from the assessment fund. Design service will be provided by the Department of Utility Services. Two design November 10, 1998 102 options will be evaluated a low pressure sewer system or a gravity sewer system --for decision-making purposes. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the above - listed project and requests authorization for the Department to proceed with the evaluation and design engineering work and award a contract for survey services through the issuance of a purchase order based on the most favorable quote in preparation for the special assessment project. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the Westgate Colony Subdivision Petition Sewer Service Project No. US -98 -19 -CS and authorized the Utilities Department to proceed with the evaluation and design engineering work and award a contract for survey services through the issuance of a purchase order based on the most favorable quote in preparation for the special assessment project, as recommended in the Memorandum. B.C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS - INFORMATION ON LAMAC'S RECOMMENDATION (WHITE PAPER) CONCERNING JOINT TITLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAND PURCHASED BY THE TRUSTEES AND COUNTIES Commissioner Adams reported that she will be in Tallahassee on Thursday and the Board had been provided with the "white paper" which has been presented to staff and is being recommended to the entire LAMAC (Land Acquisition and Management Advisory Council) in December. She advised that Brevard County Commissioner Higgs will also be there with her on Thursday to make sure this is presented and moves forward in a timely manner. CLERK'S NOTE: Report has been filed with the backup of the meeting. FOR INFORMATION ONLY - NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN November 10, 1998 103 BOOK D7 PAGE 0 r � BOOK 10.7 PAGE B.D. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT - REMARKS UPON RETIREMENT The Board of County Commissioners presented Commissioner Eggert with a dozen roses. Then she read from the following prepared remarks: As I thought of retirement, I had no idea how I'd feel when my actual final meeting was here. I find myself with many mixed emotions. Happiness in knowing I won't be receiving all those phones calls about drainage, sadness in knowing I'm leaving a family that I have worked with for 12 happy years. Slightly regretful that I didn't get everything finished, but know it's well on its way. Above all, grateful to have been working with such a wonderful staff and commissioners. When John Tippin and I were pounding out a comp plan in the early 1980's -several days a week- the county was only in its late teens moving forward into adulthood. The first current staff person I worked with was Bob Keating, who gave me a true understanding of what planning was, looking at the big picture while taking care of details and what perfectionism really is even thought we begged for more flexibility and still do! Bob taught me a lot working with him on community development and MPO. I'll always be grateful. The same is true of Stan Boling, who was easy to work with and always came up with creative solutions. Sasan Rohani who I struggled with through Affordable Housing, SHIP Program and Transportation Disadvantaged was wonderful. Believe me, we really had some challenges. Peter Radke was a great help with Economic Development. I thank you all. My first building project was the new libraries. Mary Powell, Lynn Walsh and I marched steadfastly on even though we began hitting walls before done. North County library opened first and was well received. Its only fault are the acoustics are too good and you can hear everything everywhere. The Main Library had trouble landing a site but I'm glad we chose the one we did with the Courthouse nearby. Both libraries are in need of expansion and that project will go forward, I hope. Thank you all for all your work and helpfulness. After a struggle with Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health agencies we finally got some planning money for a new health building which we built with early sales tax money. Then we fought to convince the powers that be that you didn't have to have a doctor to run the health department. A really good nurse could do it just as well. We have been delighted with Jean Kline as its head. She has been doing a wonderful job and will continue to do so. Doug Wright and I started on a long march of bringing paramedics to Indian River County and professional firefighters to North County while trying to utilize our wonderful volunteers. It was a struggle sometimes but I think we put together a group of outstanding young men and women who are serving our county with professionalism and courage. I want to thank Doug, John King, Otis Humanes, Jim Judge, Nate McCollum and Ed Kowalski along with the rest of the staff. We managed to pass the EMS District with a plan we thought would take us far into the future. However, growth has caught up with us. My one regret is not being able to complete that second plan. However, I know it's well on the way to be prepared and you should have it next spring. November 10, 1998 104 Joe Baird in his wonderful way explained that government budgets and finance are alot different from anything in the world and sometimes we just have to put up with it. When we wanted to do a project he was enormously helpful in finding ways to fund it or in carefully explaining why it wouldn't work. Not always what you wanted to hear but I'll always be grateful for his honesty and conservatism and his wanting to protect the county and us from ourselves. I thank him and Kim for all they do and I hope that the powers that be take note that his office is understaffed. Jim Davis has been a delight to work with, ever patient when we call about a drainage problem or things that we think should be able to be fixed in a minute. His patience and teaching of our road and bridge system and everything it took to build and maintain it. I know he and his engineers have worked hard on those projects and parks. I hope he'll soon find the engineer he needs. I thank him and his staff for their fine work on a lean budget. We knew the county had entered adulthood when our utility system began to expand under Terry Pinto, bringing sewer and water to Gifford, water to the industrial nodes and other foresighted planning that has helped us especially in the Economic Development area. The utilities growth was always a challenge and sometimes full of fireworks. Now we've reached another stage and Don Hubbs seems the perfect person to be running the department now. I thank him and his staff for all their help in solving problems in the district and flexibility in finding solutions to Economic Development problems. Sonny Dean and General Services have been a great help especially in construction situations and land for North County Library parking. He and I had to learn each other's languageat first but soon became pals. Thank you, Sonny. A special thank you to Ester Rymer and the Building Department and the work they've done to make it easier for contractors to finish their projects. Also to Roland DuBlois, Environmental Planner and Code Enforcement, both of which can be thankless jobs. You are appreciated. My thanks got also to Beth Jordan, Tom and Ann in Personnel, Terry Smith -Telecommunications, Jeff Tabar-Coastal Enginerr and Lynn Williams -Building and Grounds and the staff of Purchasing for all they have contributed to the county. Pat Callahan and the Recreation Dept. staff always seem to light up our lives. We thank you for all your hard work and creative ideas and enthusiasm. After going through several county administrators, we finally came upon Jim Chandler who has done an outstanding job with budget and many other tough challenges. It's been wonderful to work with you and I hope you too remember that some people like you need more staff. The Constitutional Officers were always helpful and always glad to tell us when they needed something that cost money! Wish you all the best. What can you say about the county attorneys? Charlie is always fun to tease - takes things so serious. Along with Will Collins and Terry O'Brien, they have given us good advice, protected the county and protected us from ourselves and each other. November 10, 1998 105 • BOOK. J07 PAGE D I BOOK 107 PAGE O05 7 A special thank you to Alice White, Rheta Smith and the other commission secretaries and the ladies of the Clerk of Court who have worked so hard to make our jobs easier and record the nonsense that sometimes goes on in meetings. Next we come to my fellow commissioners. Our experience together has been quite a ride -fortunately more highs than lows. I hope I've instilled a historic perspective in you and I have tried my best to train you in the job of a commissioner! However, some of you are harder nuts to crack than others. I wish you well, peace in the ranks and I'll be watching you every Tuesday (almost). Lastly, I want to telt Ruth Stanbridge how glad I am that she is taking over this position. I wish her well and hope she enjoys this as much as I have. THANK YOU ALL! A.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of the meeting the Board would reconvene sitting as the Board of Commissioners for the Emergency Services District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE PART OF THE RECORD - PROCLAMATION AND RETIREMENT AWARD TO COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT The following were presented to Commissioner Eggert on November 6, 1998, on the occasion of a retirement luncheon in her honor at the Heritage Center: 014T I'll", A A (713 '"1 "1 op'l VV %u, VVIN WHEREAS. CAROLYN IL EGGERT has announced her retirement from the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. effective November. 1998; and WHEREAS. CAROLYN was elected by the citizens of Indian River County to the Board of County Commissioners in November. 1986, and she was elected Chairman of the Board by her fellow Commissioners in 1990. 1992 and 1997; and WHEREAS. CAROLYN has served with distinction as Chairman of the following committees: Economic Development Council. 1986-98; Metropolitan Planning Organization 1993-97; Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, 1993-98; Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating November 10, 1998 C., Board. 1993-98; Emergency Services Coordinating Committee, 1988-90; Community Development Block Grant. 1987-98, Gifford Housing Improvement Committee. 1986-98; Emergency Services District Advisory Committee, 1990-98; Public Health -Primary Care Committee. 1989-98; Public Library Advisory Board, 1986-98, Children's Services Advisory Committee, 1990-92; Financial Advisory Committee. 1992; Aquaculture Advisory Committee. 1997-98; and the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. 1992 and again in 1998; WHEREAS. CAROLYN also served as a member on the Board of Trustees of the Law Library, 1986-98; Ad Hoc Committee on Indigent Care, 1993; Community Health Network, 19949$ Treasure Coast Private Industry Council, Inc.. Jobs and Education Partnership Regional Board. 1996-98; Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council, 1993-97. Health and Rehabilitative Services Interim Planning Group, District UL, 1991-92; South Florida Regional Hospital Task Force. 1991-92; Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental'Health Planning Council, District 9-B (Chairman 1989-91. Member 1987-93); and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (Chairman 1989. Member 1986-92, Alternate Member 1993-94 WHEREAS. CAROLYN assisted in the planning. development and adoption of the Indian River County Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Land Development Regulations, as well as the amendments to both. and WHEREAS. during her tenure as County Commissioner, CAROLYN EGGERT has exerted many industrious hours in bringing expanded library facilities to the residents of Indian River County. as well as working tirelessly to upgrade health and mental health programs for our citizens; and WHEREAS, she continues to support the local Arts Council with her time, energy and financial resources to enhance and expand cultural programs and make them available to all county youth and adults; and WHEREAS, through the county's Comprehensive Plan and Local Housing Assistance Program, CAROLYN directed and promoted activities to improve housing conditions, to improve the quality of life for all county residents, to improve neighborhood appearances. and to enhance a sense of belonging to a community by increasing home ownership, and WHEREAS, she led the activities of the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee and the county's Local Housing Assistance Program to ensure the availability and provision of safe. decent and affordable housing for working class families of the community. and WHEREAS. CAROLYN S. EGGERT has been the architect of emergency services migrating from an uncontrolled. uncertain response by a myriad of entities to a county -wide consolidated professional emergency services department, a dedicated team of men and women who provide emergency services response to citizens and visitors with consummate skills and impeccable standards of performance in a timely manner around the clock; and WHEREAS. CAROLYN'S unusual farsightedness. dedication and total commitment to achieve her goals relating to improvement in emergency services in the county demonstrates a genuine example of courage, initiative, innovativeness and perseverance; and WHEREAS. the advanced life support level of emergency medical services provided by paramedics and the highly skilled professional firefighters capabilities. which improved the county's fire insurance rating, is clearly attributable to CAROLYN EGGERT'S untiring efforts and is a perfect testimony to an accomplishment by her that will have a positive impact on Indian River County and its residents for many years to come; and WHEREAS. CAROLYN oversaw the activities of the Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinating Board, ensuring the availability of efficient, cost effective and quality transportation services for transportation disadvantaged persons for access to health care, employment, education, shopping, social activities and other life-sustaining activities, and she assisted and facilitated the establishment of the county's first public transportation services; and WHEREAS. CAROLYN guided the activities of the Economic Development Council to ensure enhancement of the quality of life for all county residents, to expand the county's economic base with clean. small November 10, 1998 107 O ' I PAGE GA G. r � BOOK 107 PAGE industries, to provide economic development incentives for expansion of existing industries and attraction of new industries, to decrease the county's unemployment rate, to diversify the county's economic growth and to provide for overall balanced growth in the county; and WHEREAS. CAROLYN has participated in many civic organizations and worked diligently to afford a better way of life for the people living in Indian River County. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Board of ' County Commissioners of Indian River County that the Board expresses its appreciation to CAROLYN H. EGGERT for her many accomplishments on behalf of Indian River County and those accomplishments are a tribute to her dedication to public service. BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that our heartfelt wishes for her success in future endeavors go with her. Dated this 6 day of November. 1998. November 10, 1998 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA 3iggw-�Tlpp� n,birman i mp is to ratify that Caro" - . rt is habu puattub this 1ettuntlent Awanbl for outstanbi" .prrf wo m nub faithful strata to 9,J,. Ri'.. Cdr far 5" gears of arairr On this 16d bag of n. -As lg 98 ara./C 4 C..r r.,,,. 8.1./C.d, C---. 108 rrCa..nrrrr•rcam� e» There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 11:00 a.m. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Minutes approvedl���,�� , November 10, 1998 109 LJ J hn W. Tippin, Chairman NOK 107 FnEGOS