HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/2/1999• MINUTES ATTACHED i
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
_A G E N D A
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2,1999 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman (District 1)
Caroline D. Ginn, (District 5)
Ruth Stanbridge (District 2
John W. Tippin, (District 4)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
BACKUP
PAGES
2. EWOCATION Rev. Marilyn Rieger, Co -Minister
Unity Church of Vero Beach
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add Item B.C., Approval for Out -of -County Travel to Panama City
for review of ongoing beach renourishment program for Commissioner
Ginn and Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar.
2. Delete Item 14.13.1., Approval of Minutes of January 12, 1999. These
Minutes were approved on January 26, 1999.
3. Delete Item 14.C. I., Approval of Minutes of October 20, 1998. These
Minutes were not distributed prior to today's meeting.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to
the Board: 1) Indian River Farms Water Control
District Audit Report, Annual Local Government
Financial Report & General -Purpose Audited
Financial Statements for the year ended 09130198.
2) Fellsmere Water Control District Financial
Audit and Financial Report for the Year Ended
09130198.
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated January 21, 1999) 1-10
C. Proclamation Designating Feb. 5 thru Feb. 15, `99
as "Shriner Crusade to Help Crippled Children Drive"
in Indian River County 11
D. Reimbursement for Comm. Tippin's registration fee
for computer course
(memorandum dated January 27, 1999) 12-13
na AB PnE 218
BOOK 108 PA6E219 7
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA PAGES
E. Point King Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval
for Sea Mist Court
(memorandum dated January 26, 1999) 14-18
F. Acceptance of Easements from U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
(memorandum dated January 27, 1999) 19-24
G. M.A.C.E. Grant (Multi -Agency Drug Enforcement
Unit) Project Generated Income - Budget Amend-
ment 006
(memorandum dated January 22, 1999) 25-30
H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 007
(memorandum dated January 26, 1999) 31-33
I. Reappointment of Dr. Hobin as District 19
Medical Examiner
(letter dated December 8, 1998) 34-35
J. Appointment of Wm. C. Booze, Jr. to Planning
and Zoning Code Enforcement Board
(letter dated January 6, 1999) 36-37
K. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated January 22, 1999) 38
L. Bid Award: IRC Bid #9038 / Furnish & Install
(1) Submersible Pump Including Electrical Wiring
Sandridge Golf Course
(memorandum dated January, 21, 1999) 39-42
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Sheriff Gary Wheeler:
Proposed Alarm Ordinance; Reduction of False Alarms
(letter dated January 21, 1999) 43-61
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
RS -6 AND RM -6 TO RM -8, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 41 ST STREET AND THE
WEST SIDE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, AND
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFEC-
TIVE DATE
(memorandum dated January 25, 1999) 62-77
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Treasure Coast Food Bank, Inc. Request for Funding
(memorandum dated January 27, 1999) 78-79
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
BACKUP
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS PAGES
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A: Community Development
None
B. Emergence Services
Proposed Benefit Changes to the Firefighters Relief
and Pension Fund and Realignment of the Investment
Guidelines Authorized in Changes to Chapter 175,
Florida Statutes, Pertaining to Municipal Fire Pension
Plans
(memorandum dated January 3, 1999) 80-108
C. General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Beach Preservation Plan Economic Analysis
(memorandum dated January 26, 1999) 109-110
2. St. of Fla. Dept. of Transportation Roadway
Jurisdiction Transfer Agreement, Amendment
#1 - CR510 (Wabasso Road) - US 1/S.R.5 to
S.R. AIA
(memorandum dated January 25, 1999) 111-114
H. Utilities
1. Indian River Farms Water Management
Yearly Lease Agreements, 1999
(memorandum dated January 21, 1999)
2. 16th Street Water & Force Main Relocation
Change Order No. 2 and Final Payment
(memorandum dated January 14, 1999)
I. Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
115-152
153-173
bov 168
I
BOOK 108 P4UGE22i
BACKUP
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd.): PAGES
B. Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
C. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridee
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of 1/12/99
2. Recycling & Education Grant
Litter Control Grant
Waste Tire Grant
(memorandum dated January 21, 1999) 174-187
C. Environmental Control Board
1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of 10/20/98
2. Quarterly Report
(memorandum dated January 13, 1999) 188-191
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meeting. -- - -
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER .............................................. -1-
2. INVOCATION ................................................. .1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... .1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................. -1-
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ........................ .2-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ....................................... .2-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... .2-
7.A. Reports ................................................. .2-
7.B. List of Warrants ........................................... .2-
7.C. Proclamation Designating February 5 through February 15, 1999 - "Shriner
Crusade to Help Crippled Children Drive" ........................9-
7.D. Reimbursement for Commissioner Tippin - Registration Fee for Computer
Course................................................. -10-
7.E. Point King, Inc. - Final Plat Approval - Sea Mist Court ............ .11-
7.F. Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge - Acceptance of Easements from
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Jungle Trail .................... .12-
7.G. Sheriff - M.A.C.E. Grant (Multi -Agency Drug Enforcement Unit) Project
Generated Income - Budget Amendment #006 ................... .14-
7.H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #007 ....................... .15-
7.I. District 19 Medical Examiner - Reappointment of Dr. Frederick P. Hobin -
Florida Department of Law Enforcement ....................... .17-
7.J. Planning and Zoning Code Enforcement Board - Appointment of William
C. Booze, Jr . ............................................ -18-
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-1- BOOK 103 PAGEL22
BOOK 108 FAGS 223 7
7.K. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs ................... .19-
7.L. Bid #9038 - Furnish & Install Submersible Pump Including Electrical
Wiring - Sandridge Golf Course - Paragon Electric ............... -20-
8. SHERIFF GARY WHEELER - PROPOSED ALARM ORDINANCE -
REDUCTION OF FALSE ALARMS ............................... .21-
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RS -6 AND RM -6 TO
RM -8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 41ST STREET
AND THE WEST SIDE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - SCHWERIN
REALTY CO., PAT BOBO MILES, DOUGLAS AND DOLORES DUBEAU,
ROBIN BOBO LONCARIE, AND CHRISTINE BOBO SIKES, TRUSTEE
............................................................ .27-
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK, INC. -
REQUEST FOR FUNDING ..................................... .33-
11.B. CITY OF VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF AND PENSION FUND -
PROPOSED BENEFIT CHANGES AND REALIGNMENT OF INVESTMENT
GUIDELINES AUTHORIZED IN CHANGES TO CHAPTER 175, FLORIDA
STATUTES, PERTAINING TO MUNICIPAL FIRE PENSION PLANS .... -34-
1 I.G.1. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - PHASE I -
RELEASE OF RETAINAGE - APPLIED TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT,
INC........................................................ .38-
I l.G.2. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY JURISDICTION TRANSFER
AGREEMENT - CR -510 (WABASSO ROAD) - US 1/SR-5 TO SR AIA . -39-
11.H.1. INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PERMIT
AND INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS - 1999 YEARLY LEASE
AGREEMENTS (NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, AND 8) ...................... -40-
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
11.H.2. 16TH STREET WATER & FORCE MAIN RELOCATION - CHANGE ORDER
#2 AND FINAL PAYMENT - PROJECT UW -98 -02 -DS AND US -98 -03 -CS -
DRIVEWAYS, INC . ......................................... .41-
13.C. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE D. GINN - APPROVAL FOR OUT -OF -
COUNTY TRAVEL TO PANAMA CITY FOR REVIEW OF ONGOING
BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROGRAM .......................... -42-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................ .43-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD .......................... .43 -
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-3- Bou 108 t1,,E 224
0
February 2, 1999
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25°i Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, February 2, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman; Fran
B. Adams, Vice Chairman; John W. Tippin; Caroline D. Ginn; and Ruth Stanbridge. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County
Attorney; and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Macht called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Reverend Marilyn Rieger, Co -Minister of Unity Church of Vero Beach, delivered the
Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Macht requested 2 deletions from today's Agenda:
1. Item 14.B. I., Approval of Minutes of January 12, 1999. These Minutes were
approved on January 26, 1999.
2. Item W.C. I., Approval of Minutes of October 20, 1998. These Minutes were
not distributed prior to today's meeting.
Commissioner Ginn requested the addition of Item 13.C., Approval of Out -of -County
Travel to Panama City for review of ongoing beach renourishment program.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
-1- Bo f��t 225
BOOK 108 PACE 226
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously made the above changes to the Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
None.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that Item 71 be separated for discussion.
7.A. REPORTS
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board:
1. Indian River Farms Water Control District Audit Report, Annual Local
Government Financial Report & General -Purpose Audited Financial
Statements for the Year Ended 09/30/98
2. Fellsmere Water Control District Financial Audit and Financial Report for the
Year Ended 09/30/98
7.B. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 21, 1999:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: JANUARY 21. 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY. JR.. FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06. Florida Statutes, all warrants issued,
by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants. issued by the Clerk
to the Board. for the time period of January 20 to January 21. 1999.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for the period from
January 20, 1999 through January 21, 1999, as
recommended by staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0019782
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-01-20
6,462.50
0019783
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
1999-01-20
138.50
0019784
BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-01-20
422.04
0019785
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-01-20
135.20
0019786
ST LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-01-20
724.98
0019787
RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-01-20
150.00
0019788
VELASQUEZ, MERIDA
1999-01-20
200.00
0019789
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF
1999-01-20
5,646.42
0019790
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
1999-01-20
146.94
0019791
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1999-01-20
300.00
0019792
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
1999-01-20
1,968.00
0019793
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
1999-01-20
82,813.65
0019794
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
1999-01-20
257.69
0019795
NACO/SOUTHEAST
1999-01-20
5,335.47
0019796
KEY TRUST COMPANY
1999-01-20
596.21
0019797
OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REL
1999-01-20
167.25
0019798
DOUGLAS COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
1999-01-20
23.08
0241695
HULSLANDER, RUSSELL
1998-04-30
.00
0251337
FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC
1998-10-29
.00
0253759
BASS, JAMES
1998-12-10
.00
0254292
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1998-12-17
.00
0254406
VERO HERITAGE, INC
1998-12-17
.00
0254504
BEMENT, TAMMY L
1998-12-17
.00
0254649
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1998-12-30
.00
0255068
.WHITE, JEFF
1998-12-30
.00
0255071.
YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS
1998-12-30
.00
0255354
RISSMAN, WEISBERG, BARRETT,
1999-01-07
.00
0255877
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
1999-01-21
95.00
0255878
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
1999-01-21
6.00
0255879
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
1999-01-21
6.58
0255880
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
1999-01-21
445.00
0255881
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
1999-01-21
16.15
0255882
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
1999-01-21
57.57
0255883
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
1999-01-21
392.82
0255884
ACTION DIESEL INJECTION
1999-01-21
12.86
0255885
ANCESTRY, INC
1999-01-21
16.96
0255886
AMERICAN TRAUMA SOCIETY
1999-01-21
35.00
0255887
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
1999-01-21
29.95
0255888
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
1999-01-21
62.50
0255889
AMERICAN AIR FILTER
1999-01-21
1,819.54
0255890
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
1999-01-21
15.41
0255891
A T & T
1999-01-21
1.48
0255892
A T & T LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
1999-01-21
136.00
0255893
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC
1999-01-21
63.00
0255894
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
1999-01-21
253.66
0255895
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
1999-01-21
195.41
0255896
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1999-01-21
6,664.02
0255897
ADULT LITERACY SERVICE OF
1999-01-21
15.00
0255898
ARCH PAGING
1999-01-21
556.70
0255899
A T & T
1999-01-21
98.88
0255900
AUDIO VISUALS OF TAMPA
1999-01-21
68.69
0255901
AVIATION & AEROSPACE ALMANAC
1999-01-21
101.00
0255902
ART & CRAFT EVENT DIRECTORY
1999-01-21
19.95
0255903
ALL CREATURES GREAT & SMALL
1999-01-21
10.00
0255904
BAIRD, JOSEPH A
1999-01-21
75.00
0255905
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1999-01-21
4,531.54
0255906
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
1999-01-21
37,542.87
0255907
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1999-01-21
3,352.50
0255908
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1999-01-21
105.39
0255909
BARNETT BAIL BONDS
1999-01-21
1,943.00
0255910
BARTON, JEFFREY K
1999-01-21
1,245.50
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-3-
BOOK PAGUE 227
BOOK 108 PAGES
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0255911
BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-01-21
8,172.75
0255912
BRODART CO
1999-01-21
1,874.77
0255913
BRANDTS & FLETCHERS APPLIANCE
1999-01-21
147.66
0255914
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
1999-01-21
9.90
0255915
BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS
1999-01-21
241.94
0255916
BELLSOUTH
1999-01-21
1,519.45
0255917
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
1999-01-21
20,405.40
0255918
BRENNAN, RANDALL
1999-01-21
126.01
0255919
BEYEL BROTHERS CRANE
1999-01-21
250.00
0255920
BMG
1999-01-21
79.48
0255921
BASELINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
1999-01-21
45,267.28
0255922
BELL, MICHAEL D MD
1999-01-21
900.00
0255923
BROWN, JASON
1999-01-21
342.00
0255924
BAPTIST HOSPITAL
1999-01-21
4,280.62
0255925
.BAKER, PAMELA A
1999-01-21
50.00
0255926.
BELLSOUTH
1999-01-21
1,832.80
0255927
CABOT LODGE
1999-01-21
69.00
0255928
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
1999-01-21
9,236.00
0255929
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-01-21
1,869.90
0255930
CRAMER, CHARLES A
1999-01-21
27.00
0255931
CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY BOOKS
1999-01-21
152.63
0255932
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
1999-01-21
44.64
0255933
CHELETTE, RODNEY
1999-01-21
25.33
0255934
CENTRAL FLORIDA LIBRARY
1999-01-21
500.00
0255935
CROSSROADS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1999-01-21
15.00
0255936
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1999-01-21
53.50
0255937
CRIMES COMPENSATION TRUST
1999-01-21
138.75
0255938
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
1999-01-21
60,541.38
0255939
CRESCENT RESEARCH SERVICE, INC
1999-01-21
2,255.20
0255940
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
1999-01-21
8.15
0255941
DELTA SUPPLY CO
1999-01-21
424.51
0255942
DEMCO INC
1999-01-21
434.79
0255943
DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
1999-01-21
188.46
0255944
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1999-01-21
746.15
0255945
DESIGNED TRAFFIC
1999-01-21
15,304.00
0255946
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
1999-01-21
68.03
0255947
EGP, INC
1999-01-21
386.00
0255948
ELPEX, INC
1999-01-21
77.85
0255949
E -Z BOOK COMPANY
1999-01-21
51.80
0255950
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
1999-01-21
500.00
0255951
FLORIDA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
1999-01-21
60.00
0255952
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1999-01-21
14,771.53
0255953
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
1999-01-21
2,662.20
0255954
F P & L
1999-01-21
685.27
0255955
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
1999-01-21
255.00
0255956
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
1999-01-21
90.39
0255957
FENIMORE, CHARLES
1999-01-21
165.00
0255958
FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
1999-01-21
125.00
0255959
FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK
1999-01-21
445.00
0255960
FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
1999-01-21
25.00
0255961
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
1999-01-21
53.43
0255962
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-01-21
36.17
0255963
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1999-01-21
335.50
0255964
GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
1999-01-21
213.64
0255965
G P N
1999-01-21
99.75
0255966
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
1999-01-21
1.00
0255967
GIBSON, JAMES
1999-01-21
65.00
0255968
HARBOR BRANCH OCEANOGRAPH, INC
1999-01-21
1,200.00
0255969
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1999-01-21
56.62
0255970
HERITAGE QUEST
1999-01-21
154.52
0255971
HACH COMPANY
1999-01-21
168.20
0255972
HAILE DEAN SEED CO
1999-01-21
282.00
0255973
HOLIDAY INN
1999-01-21
391.60
0255974
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-01-21
175.00
0255975
INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
1999-01-21
1,030.20
0255976
.INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1999-01-21
1,876.40
0255977.
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
1999-01-21
533.00
0255978
INTERSTATE BILLING SERVICE
1999-01-21
1,556.59
0255979
ISIS PUBLISHING
1999-01-21
6.75
0255980
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
1999.-01-21
135.00
0255981
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-01-21
51.25
0255982
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-01-21
225.00
0255983
INTERNATIONAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
1999-01-21
72,125.00
0255984
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-01-21
190,971.90
0255985
IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
1999-01-21
256.66
0255986
INTELECT NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES
1999-01-21
3,365.05
0255987
JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
_1999-01-21
65.46
0255988
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
1999-01-21
726.42
0255989
JAFFE, ROBERT F, ES
1999-01-21
50.00
0255990
JOHNSON,CAROLYNETTE
1999-01-21
69.53
0255991
RING, JOHN W
1999-01-21
118.27
0255992
K & S RIP RAP SERVICES
1999-01-21
7,780.00
0255993
KELLY TRACTOR CO
1999-01-21
323.70
0255994
KYLE'S RUN APARTMENTS
1999-01-21
300.00
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-s- BOOK 108 FacF 0229
CK
CHECK
CHECK
NAME
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER
0255995
KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
1999-01-21
2,153.20
0255996
L I TREE SERVICE, INC
1999-01-21
250.00
0255997
LABEL n, ARTHUR
1999-01-21
400.00
0255998
LIVE OAK ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1999-01-21
10.00
0255999
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1999-01-21
189.00
0256000
LFI VERO BEACH, INC
1999-01-21
6,722.49
0256001
LIBRARY STORE
1999-01-21
167.85
0256002
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
1999-01-21
58.04
0256003
LETTS, DAVID
1999-01-21
497.00
0256004
LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO
1999-01-21
434.75
0256005
LANDOLL INC
1999-01-21
4.99
0256006
LARJON & COMPANY INC
1999-01-21
39.00
0256007
MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY
1999-01-21
40.00
0256008
MASSUNG, KIMBERLY E
1999-01-21
31.95
0256009
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
1999-01-21
233.06
0256010
MIKES GARAGE
1999-01-21
140.00
0256011
MATRX MEDICAL, INC
1999-01-21
125.76
0256012
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
1999-01-21
75.68
0256013
MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
1999-01-21
1,541.86
0256014
MAURER, ERMA B, RN
1999-01-21
69.00
0256015
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
1999-01-21
76.12
0256016
MARC INDUSTRIES
1999-01-21
34.00
0256017
MEDCHECK
1999-01-21
814.87
0256018
MOSS, ROGER
1999-01-21
48.93
0256019
MACWILLIAMS, KEVIN ESQ
1999-01-21
264.00
0256020
METALLURGICAL INC
1999-01-21
705.21
0256021
MCCLOUD, TONY
1999-01-21
91.00
0256022
NEFF MACHINERY, INC
1999-01-21
280.99
0256023
NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
1999-01-21
47.13
0256024
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1999-01-21
1,540.29
0256025
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
1999-01-21
15,953.70
0256026
PAN AMERICAN ENG CO
1999-01-21
240.00
0256027
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
1999-01-21
35.87
0256028•
POSTMASTER
1999-01-21
335.00
0256029
POSTMASTER
1999-01-21
99.00
0256030
PHYSIO CONTROL
1999-01-21
1,040.67
0256031
PRESS JOURNAL
1999.-01-21
216.00
0256032
PAGE, LIVINGSTON
1999-01-21
312.00
0256033
PRESS JOURNAL/STUART NEWS
1999-01-21
1,287.51
0256034
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1999-01-21
240.16
0256035
POPE, JAMES M AND ELEANOR D
1999-01-21
2,829.70
0256036
PARKER, DEBBIE
1999-01-21
51.50
0256037
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
1999-01-21
30:14
0256038
R & J CRANE SERVICE, INC
1999-01-21
187.50
0256039
RADISSON PLAZA HOTEL
1999-01-21
95.00
0256040
RANGEMASTER S E, INC
1999-01-21
390.00
0256041
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
1999-01-21
65.73
0256042
RADKE, PETER
1999-01-21
18.85
0256043
ROTECH OXYGEN AND MEDICAL
1999-01-21
113.00
0256044
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
1999-01-21
115.00
0256045
SCOTTY'S, INC
1999-01-21
2,597.97
0256046
ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
1999-01-21
94.85
0256047
STATE OF FLORIDA
1999-01-21
27,333.11
0256048
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
1999-01-21
774.66
0256049
SUDDEN IMAGES
1999-01-21
6.50
0256050
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
1999-01-21
120.00
0256051
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1999-01-21
1,078.96
0256052
SIMON & SCHUSTER
1999-01-21
238.73
0256053
SAFESPACE
1999-01-21
1,250.00
0256054
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF IRC
1999-01-21
977.50
0256055
SALEM PRESS, INC
1999-01-21
112.25
0256056
SEBASTIAN RIVER WATER
1999-01-21
10,600.00
0256057
SANFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY
1999-01-21
6.00
0256058
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
1999-01-21
12,458.82
0256059
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-01-21
55.00
0256060
SANDY PINES
1999-01-21
84.00
0256061
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
1999-01-21
429.38
0256062
SKALA, ERIC
1999-01-21
38.63
0256063
SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
1999-01-21
1,522.50
0256064
SMITH, HENRY
1999-01-21
71.00
0256065
STAGE & SCREEN
1999-01-21
171.07
0256066
SKINNER, DONNA
1999-01-21
130.00
0256067
SHERATON SUITES TAMPA AIRPORT
1999-01-21
278.00
0256068
SAMARITAN CENTER
1999-01-21
3,358.33
0256069
ST LUCIE COUNTY BOARD
1999-01-21
105,377.41
0256070
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-01-21
10,428.30
0256071
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
1999-01-21
33,320.52
0256072
TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER
1999-01-21
1,019.03
0256073
TCI MEDIA SERVICES
1999-01-21
75.00
0256074
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
1999-01-21
206.29
0256075
TRADESHOW WEEK
1999-01-21
367.63
0256076
U S DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
1999-01-21
280.00
0256077
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
1999-01-21
90.00
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-s- BOOK 108 FacF 0229
BOOK 108 FADE 30
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0256078
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1999-01-21
27,316.62
0256079
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
1999-01-21
3,834.00
0256080
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-01-21
30,787.52
0256081
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1999-01-21
288.40
0256082
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
1999-01-21
500.49
0256083
VERO TRAVEL SERVICE, INC
1999-01-21
130.59
0256084
VERO MARINE CENTER, INC
1999-01-21
35.80
0256085
VIDEO PALACE
1999-01-21
1,850.00
0256086
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-01-21
50.00
0256087
VERO BEARING & BOLT
1999-01-21
28.15
0256088
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
1999-01-21
125.00
0256089
VICKERS, REGINALD
1999-01-21
165.00
0256090
VISTA HARBOR CONDOMINIUM
1999-01-21
700.00
0256091
WRIGHT, DOUGLAS M
1999-01-21
216.00
0256092
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
1999-01-21
56.00
0256093
WALKER, KEITH
1999-01-21
90.00
0256094
WOSN-FM RADIO STATION
1999-01-21
468.00
0256095
WORLDCOM
1999-01-21
47.17
0256096
WEISS & NEWBERRY MEDICAL ASSOC
1999-01-21
350.00
0256097
WASHINGTON MUTUAL
1999-01-21
10.45
0256098
WILKERSON, KENISHA
1999-01-21
72.10
0256099
WAVW-FM
1999-01-21
450.00
0256100
XEROX CORPORATION
1999-01-21
268.78
0256101
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
1999-01-21
298.24
0256102
YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
1999-01-21
37.50
0256103
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1999-01-21
33.35
0256104
MILLER, JOSEPH
1999-01-21
122.26
0256105
D AGOSTINO, FRANK
1999-01-21
58.05
0256106
GREEN, THELMA R
1999-01-21
50.00
0256107
CAL BUILDERS, INC
1999-01-21
38.13
0256108
CUMMINGS, JERRY
1999-01-21
19.78
0256109
GARCIA, ARTURO
1999-01-21
77.73
0256110
CROOM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
1999-01-21
63.53
0256111
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS, INC
1999-01-21
53.34
0256112
AIRLITE PROCESSING CORP
1999-01-21
220.35
0256113
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
1999-01-21
158.82
0256114
BRYANT, CARLTON JEROME
1999-01-21
13.54
0256115
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
1999-01-21
31.59
0256116
CENTURY 21 SEA TREK
1999-01-21
39.85
0256117
CHAPMAN, JAMES H
1999-01-21
45.16
0256118
KRAMER, KIM
1999-01-21
35.05
0256119
RIGHTON, HARRY
1999-01-21
30.91
0256120
JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS, INC
1999-01-21
30.91
0256121
C & S DEVELOPMENT CORP
1999-01-21
41.88
0256122
WENDYS INTERNATIONAL
1999-01-21
239.01
0256123
GBO VERO BEACH, INC
1999-01-21
74.78
0256124
CLENDENING, CHARLES & ANITA
1999-01-21
51.11
0256125
CARLIN, DR & MRS RICHARD T
1999-01-21
151.16
0256126
CROSBY II, WILLIAM B
1999-01-21
19.64
0256127
WHITE, ANTINY
1999-01-21
30.71
0256128
MGB CONSTRUCTION, INC
1999-01-21
82.36
0256129
BROGNANO, DANIEL J
1999-01-21
71.59
0256130
MARTIN, DANIEL
1999-01-21
24.71
0256131
PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION
1999-01-21
35.34
0256132
COASTAL HOME TRADING
1999-01-21
54.60
0256133
OAK HARBOR CLUB PROPERTIES
1999-01-21
75.65
0256134
DE LEEUW, NEAL & LYDEE
1999-01-21
28.49
0256135
GUY, DEBORAH
1999-01-21
53.40
0256136
DI ROCCO CONSTRUCTION
1999-01-21
22.98
0256137
PEDERSON III, FRANK O
1999-01-21
65.25
0256138
FISHER, ROGER
1999-01-21
55.30
0256139
WENDYS INTERNATIONAL, INC
1999-01-21
309.77
0256140
BOOR RACK
1999-01-21
80.10
0256141
DALEY, MARISSA & SHAWN
1999-01-21
26.39
0256142
H U D
1999-01-21
10.43
0256143
MANNING JR, ARTHUR L
1999-01-21
59.70
0256144
RIVERA, OLIVER
1999-01-21
11.24
0256145
DEMEARS, PAUL J
1999-01-21
33.97
0256146
SPAGNOLIA, DOUG
1999-01-21
65.56
0256147
GRAND HARBOR LTD
1999-01-21
76.51
0256148,
CASAGRANDE, THOMAS E
1999-01-21
34.13
0256149
SEQUOIA CORPORATION
1999-01-21
72.05
0256150
SCHOBERG, TERESA
1999-01-21
9.47
0256151
GENESIS CHURCH
1999-01-21
34.65
0256152
LINDSEY GARDENS LTD
1999-01-21
200.52
0256153
BLEND, WILLIAM
1999-01-21
37.01
0256154
FOSTER MANAGEMENT -_
1999-01-21
79.72
0256155
PARRIS, G T
1999-01-21
27.90
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0256156
BROWN, JEANNE S
1999-01-21
102.16
0256157
TALLARINI, DONOTO
1999-01-21
55.46
0256158
HOVERMALE, T K
1999-01-21
57.59
0256159
CARNEY, MICHAEL
1999-01-21
31.21
0256160
ADAMSON, MARY L
1999-01-21
63.84
0256161
BICKMAN, ANNA F
1999-01-21
27.86
0256162
CELY, JOHN MARK
1999-01-21
18.93
0256163
SANTOYO, JOSE
1999-01-21
56.79
0256164
POLK, MIHAN
1999-01-21
43.57
0256165
DEL GROSSO, EUNICE H
1999-01-21
105.06
0256166
GEARHARDT, CECELIA E
1999-01-21
52.52
0256167
HAYHURST, WILLIAM
1999-01-21
53.16
0256168
THOMPSON, R J
1999-01-21
52.53
0256169
ANTON, ROBERT
1999-01-21
59.93
0256170
VARLEY, WAYNE T
1999-01-21
105.02
0256171
DEPUE III, CLARK A
1999-01-21
105.02
0256172
MARTIN, HENRY H
1999-01-21
60.27
0256173
SMITH, CAROLYN M
1999-01-21
105.04
0256174
BEMENT, TAMMY L
1999-01-21
51.13
0256175
ANDERSON, FRED
1999-01-22
148.00
0256176
ATKINSON, RICHARD F
1999-01-22
238.00
0256177
BECHT, TONYA AND CITY OF VERO
1999-01-22
92.00
0256178
BRO%TON, LYDIA
1999-01-22
219.00
0256179
BREVCO PROPERTIES, INC
1999-01-22
471.00
0256180
BEUTTELL, PETER M
1999-01-22
270.00
0256181,
SILKEN GROUP
1999-01-22
1,605.00
0256182
BEANS, ROBERT
1999-01-22
226.00
0256183
BROOKS, DONNA AND CITY OF VERO
1999-01-22
59.00
0256184
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
1999.-01-22
1,465.00
0256185
BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
1999-01-22
397.00
0256186
BLAHNIK, CHRIS OR MILDRED
1999-01-22
364.00
0256187
BUCKNER, SHEILA & CITY OF VERO
1999-01-22
84.00
0256188
BISHOP, SUSAN D
1999-01-22
256.00
0256189
BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF
1999-01-22
558.97
0256190
BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY
1999-01-22
514.94
0256191
BAYLES, DENNIS
1999-01-22
398.00
0256192
BLUE, YOLANDA
1999-01-22
248.00
0256193
BACON, CHARISMA AND CITY OF
1999-01-22
26.00
0256194
CARTWRIGHT, WILLIAM AND/
1999-01-22
197.00
0256195
CORR, RHODA L
1999-01-22
292.00
0256196
COLLINS, THOMAS H
1999-01-22
276.00
0256197
COSCO, KEN
1999-01-22
478.00
0256198
CARLTON, ALLAN R
1999-01-22
306.00
0256199
C P E ASSOCIATES
1999-01-22
759.00
0256200
CAPAR, GERALD T
1999-01-22
350.00
0256201
CUMMINGS, JERRY
1999-01-22
438.00
0256202
COLDWELL BANKER
1999-01-22
426.00
0256203
CLUNN, JEFFREY
1999-01-22
314.00
0256204
CARONE, PAUL
1999-01-22
230.00
0256205
CARLUCCI, LEONARD A
1999-01-22
404.00
0256206
DAN PREUSS REALTY, INC
1999-01-22
274.00
0256207
DOOLITTLE JAMES A & ASSOCIATES
1999-01-22
2,272.00
0256208
DENNISON, WANDA
1999-01-22
926.00
0256209
DOVE, E WILSON
1999-01-22
267.00
0256210
DOYLE, DON
1999-01-22'
305.00
0256211
DIXON, LATONIA AND CITY OF
1999-01-22
8.00
0256212
ELWELL, JACQUELINE & F P & L
1999-01-22
4.00
0256213
EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
1999-01-22
187.00
0256214
EDWARD, FRANKLIN
1999-01-22
328.00
0256215
FOGERTY, GEORGE A
1999-01-22
315.00
0256216
FRESH, DANIEL J
1999-01-22
228.00
0256217
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
1999-01-22
1,543.91
0256218
FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC
1999-01-22
260.00
0256219
GASKILL, ROBERT
1999-01-22
251.00
0256220
GRIMM, FLOYD OR HELEN
1999-01-22
149.00
0256221
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
1999-01-22
8,481.00
0256222
GEORGE, MARY KIM
1999-01-22
579.00
0256223
GRACE'S LANDING LTD
1999-01-22
2,651.00
0256224
GLOVERSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY
1999-01-22
270.97
0256225
HAWKINS, WANDA
1999-01-22
220.00
0256226
HOLM, LEO
1999-01-22
445.00
0256227
INDIAN RIVER INVESTMENT
1999-01-22
270.00
0256228
IMBRIANI, VINCENT
1999-01-22
279.00
0256229
JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES
1999-01-22
6,704.00
0256230
JENSEN, PETER C
1999-01-22
529.00
0256231
JAHOLKOWSKI, PAUL
1999-01-22
278.00
0256232.
JENNINGS, LESSIE
1999-01-22
205.00
0256233
JAHOLKOWSKI, MIKE
1999-01-22
210.00
0256234
JULIN, PAUL
1999-01-22
210.00
0256235
JONES, CECILIA AND CITY OF
1999-01-22
40.00
0256236
JONES, WILLIAM C
1999-01-22
335.00
0256237
JACOBS, CARRIE AND FLORIDA
1999-01-22
85.00
0256238
JONES, ALPHONSO
1999-01-22
258.00
0256239
KOLB, GREGORY L
1999-01-22
433.00
0256240
KUBILUS, DEBRA AND CITY OF
1999-01-22
75.00
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0256241 LAWRENCE, TERRY A
1999-01-22
0256242 LLERENA, E D
191.00
0256243 LANGLEY, PHILIP G
1999-01-22
472.00
0256244 LAWRENCE, CHARLENE FRANCES
1999-01-22
1999-01-22
230.00
0256245 LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
455.001999-01-22
0256246 MIXELI,, LLONALD AND/OR
1999-01-22
2,446.00
0256247 M O D INVESTMENTS
410.00
0256248MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
1999-01-22
759.00
0256249 MANN, ROBERT OR WANDA ARM
1999-01-22
210.00
0256250 MORRILL, TINA AND CITY OF
1999-01-22
1999-01-22
217.00
0256251 MCINTOSH, SYLVESTER B JR
1999-01-22
31.00
0256252 MULLINS, B FRANK
1999-01-22
426.00
0256253 MC CLAY, ROBIN
501.00
02562541999-01-22
NELSON, DONALD J & NINE R
1999-01-22
312.00
0256255 NEUHAUSER' ERNEST
1999-01-22
500.00
0256256 NIRMIKA LIVING STONES, INC
1999-01-22
273.00
0256257 OLIVER, DOROTHY
1999-01-22
337.00
400.00
0256258 ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND
1999-01-22
604.97
0256259 PARKER, RALPH & CITY OF VERO
1999-01-22
91.00
0256260 PALMER TRAILER PARK
1999-01-22
449.00
0256261 PITTMAN, CATHERINE & CITY OF
1999-01-22
96.00
0256262 POLLY, EMMA
1999-01-22
345.00
0256263 PIERSON, JOHN H DBA
1999-01-22
324.00
0256264 POSADO, LORI
1999-01-22
375.00
0256265 PINKNEY, RACHEL J
1999-01-22
151.00
0256266 PALUMBO, LOUIS
1999-01-22
294.00
0256267 PIUMELLI, MICHAEL
1999-01-22
327.00
0256268 REAGAN, WILLIE C
1999-01-22
722.00
0256269 RENNICK, RONALD
1999-01-22
313.00
0256270 RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST
1999-01-22
121.00
0256271 REALTY CONNECTIONS OF VERO,INC
1999-01-22
921.00
0256272 REARDANZ, MARVIN
1999-01-22
408.00
0256273 RICHARDS, WILLIAM A
1999-01-22
470.00
0256274 RODRIGUEZ, BLANCA
1999-01-22
400.00
0256275 RICOTTI, RICARDO
1999-01-22
161.00
0256276 RIVER PARK PLACE
1999-01-22
1,052.00.
0256277 SCHORNER, JAMES A
1999-01-22
180.00
0256278 ST FRANCIS MANOR
1999-01-22
2,460.00
0256279 SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
1999-01-22
324.00
0256280 SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR
1999-01-22
490.00
0256281 SAVAGE, GEORGE R
1999-01-22
103.00
0256282 SANFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY
1999-01-22
521.97
0256283. SMOAK, JEANETTE AND CITY
1999-01-22
34.00
0256284 SANDY PINES
1999-01-22
2,259.00
0256285 SHELTON, ROBERT L
1999-01-22
505.00
0256286 STARCK, MICHAEL R
1999-01-22
382.00
0256287 STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR
1999-01-22
172.00
0256288 SUNDMAN, IVAN
1999-01-22
203.00
0256289 SPARKS, DAVID
1999-01-22
207.00
0256290 SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA
1999-01-22
65.00
0256291 TROPICAL SHORELAND, INC OR
1999-01-22
245.00
0256292 TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING
1999-01-22
281.00
0256293 VERO MOBILE HOME PARK
1999-01-22
455.00
0256294 VOLF VILCEK, JULIANNA
1999-01-22
196.00
0256295 VERO FIRST CORPORATION
1999-01-22
2,442.00
0256296 VARJABEDIAN, SUMPAD
1999-01-22
527.00
0256297 BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN)
0256298 WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M
1999-01-22
284.00
0256299 WILLIAMS, DEBRA WASHINGTON
1999-01-22
1999-01-22
462.00
0256300 YORK, LILLY B
1999-01-22
121.00
194.00
0256301 YORK, DAVID
0256302
1999-01-22
467.00
ZANCA, LEONARD
1999-01-22
1,129.00
1,049,215.99
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
0
tou oma }
0
Z C. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING FEBRUARY S THROUGH FEBRUARY 15,
1999 - "SHRINER CRUSADE TO HELP CRIPPLED CHILDRENDRIVE"
The Chairman read the following Proclamation:
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING FEBRUARY 5 THROUGH FEBRUARY 15, 1999
AS "SHRINER CRUSADE TO HELP CRIPPLED
CHILDREN DRIVE" IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, patients from the counties of Indian River, Martin,
St. Lucie, Palm Beach and Okeechobee have,through the Shriner
Hospitals for Crippled Children, been meeting their needs for
orthopedic and burn care; and
WHEREAS, the Amara Temple is a part of 720,000 Shriners
throughout North America that support 19 orthopedic hospitals and 3
burn institutes that provide specialized expert care for needy
children -up to their 18th birthday absolutely FREE; and
WHEREAS, this large group of Shriners of North America made
this commitment over 70 years ago to help needy crippled and burned
victims get the expert long term care they need to have a chance
for a healthy normal productive life; and
WHEREAS, it is recognized that in order to continue this great
service and tradition of caring, it is necessary to enlist the help
and support of individuals of the community, and ask them to take a
moment to learn more about these hospitals and burn care units so
that the public can refer a child needing such services to us; and
WHEREAS, this request for public support is made only once a
year. A free newspaper is given to all, telling of the Shriners'
Crusade to help these needy children:
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT PROCLAIINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that February 5
through February 15, 1999 be designated as
SHRINERS CRUSADE TO HELP CRIPPLED CHILDREN DRIVE
in Indian River County, and the Board further urges all citizens of
this county to show their appreciation to the Shriners for their
good works both on a local and national level for the benefit of
all.
Adopted this 2nd day of February, 1999.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
/L
eth R. Macht, ch& zman
W
•
Boa N8 �j
4 7
BOOK 108 PAGE 3
7.D. REIMBURSEMENT FOR COMML4SIONER TIPPIN-REGISTRATIONFEE
FOR COMPUTER COURSE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum `of January 27, 1999:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Alice E. White
Executive Aide
Date: January 27, 1999
Subject: Reimbursement for Commissioner Tippin's registration fee
for computer course
Commissioner Tippin is taking a computer course at Mueller Center to assist
him in handling his county duties. He is respectfully requesting reimbursement
for his registration fee in the amount of $152.00, which will come from the
registration account under travel, 001-101-511-035.42.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved reimbursement to
Commissioner Tippin of $152 representing
registration fees at Mueller Center for a computer
course.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-10-
0 0
ZE. POINT KING. IN - - FINAL PI.ATAPPROVAL -SEA MIST COURT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 26, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
yulf It e -
Robert M. Keating, AI
Community ^Developm t�irer
!� (3 .
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP�,ApA
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: January 26, 1999
SUBJECT: Point King Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval for Sea Mist Court
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formai consideration by the Board.of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 2, 1999.
Sea Mist Court is a 23 lot subdivision of a 5.3 acre parcel of land located on the west side of SR
A -1-A between Mooringline Drive and Windward Way. The subject property is zoned OCR, Office,
Commercial Residential (up to 6 units per acre) and has a land use designation of C/I Commercial
Industrial (up to 6 units per acre for residential uses). The density of the subdivision is 4.37 units
per acre.
On January 22, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat and site plan
approval for Sea Mist Court. Approval was given to plat over a site plan approved project for 23
single family detached residential units. Development of units will proceed under the parameters
of the approved site plan. The developer, Point King, Inc., subsequently obtained a land
development permit and has completed construction of the required subdivision improvements. The
developer is now requesting final plat approval and has submitted the following:
A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary plat.
All required subdivision improvements have been completed by the developer and the county has
inspected and approved the required improvements. All proposed subdivision improvements are
privately dedicated with the exception of the utility system, which is dedicated to the City of Vero
Beach. The applicant has provided a letter from the City of Vero Beach acknowledging that the
developer has met all of the city's criteria for final plat approval. Therefore, no warranty and
maintenance agreement is required. All requirements of final plat approval are satisfied.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
plat approval for Sea Mist Court.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-11- Boa 108 PnE235
BOOK 108 �-AGE 238 1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously granted final plat approval for Sea Mist
Court, as recommended by staff.
7. F. PELICAN ISLAND NATIONAL. WILDLIFE REFUGE - ACCEPTANCE OF
EASEMENTS FROM U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE -JUNGLE TRAIL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 27, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICPA -
Community Development Director
DATE: January 27, 1999
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Easements from
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 2, 1999.
In 1994, Indian River County's Jungle Trail enhancement project application was approved by FDOT.
Funded at approximately $3.2 million, the project involved various improvements to Jungle Trail.
During the program development and preliminary design phase of the Jungle Trail project, it was
determined that the project could not be undertaken as initially proposed. Consequently, the Jungle
Trail project was significantly downsized and unneeded Jungle Trail funds were allocated to other
enhancement projects in the County.
As revised, the Jungle Trail enhancement project now involves construction of parking lots,
restrooms, and related improvements on three sites along Jungle Trail. Two of these sites are located
in the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge and owned by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS).
Because U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service owns two of the sites on which enhancement funded
improvements will be constructed, FDOT requires that Indian River County, the enhancement project
applicant, obtain easements from USFWS. The easements will document that the County, as the
enhancement applicant, will have control of the enhancement funded improvements for the life of the
improvements. As ofthis time, an easement document has been prepared and executed by USFWS.
It is now necessary for the Board of County Commissioners to formally accept the easements.
For the past year, County and MPO staff coordinated with FDOT staff and USFWS staff to obtain
easements on the subject sites. In so doing, county and MPO staff, in coordination with FDOT and
USFWS, developed conceptual designs for the improvements, identified construction project limits
on each site, surveyed the sites, prepared legal descriptions and survey sketches for each site, and
developed a draft easement document.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
is 0
•
Several months ago, the draft easement document was sent to USFWS for execution. Because any
property transfers must be authorized by the USFWS Division of Realty office in Atlanta, the draft
document was reviewed by that office. Recently, the Division of Realty transmitted an executed
easement document which is substantially different from the original County's draft of the easement
document. A copy is attached.
As structured, the easement agreement contains 18 conditions. Although extensive in number and
detail, the conditions are not inconsistent with the proposed enhancement project. In fact, many of
the conditions will apply to the USFWS, itself, since Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge staff
(USFWS staff) will be responsible for maintenance of the improvements after construction.
For the Jungle Trail enhancement project to proceed, the Board of County Commissioners must
formally accept the easement from USFWS. The easement document has been reviewed by County
planning, MPO and legal staff. While recognizing that the easement conditions appear to be standard
conditions more appropriate to an easement granted to a private party, staff found that the terms are
acceptable and recommends that the Board accept the easements.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the USFWS easements for the
two enhancement project sites within the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously accepted the USFWS easements for the
two enhancement project sites within the Pelican
Island National Wildlife Refuge, as recommended by
staff.
EASEMENTS WILL BE RECORDED IN THE
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-13-
•
BOOK IUS PnE 37
600K PAS[ 238
7.G. SHERIFF - M.A. C. E. GRANT MULTI -AGENCY DRUG ENFORCEMENT
UNIT) PROJECT GENERATED INCOME- BUDGETAMENDMENT #006
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: January 22, 1999
SUBJECT: M.A.C.E. GRANT (MULTI -AGENCY DRUG ENFORCEMENT UNIT)
PROJECT GENERATED INCOME - BUDGET AMENDMENT 006
CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A'Baird CZ
OMB Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Indian River County Sheriffs Department wants to apply to the state to use anti-drug abuse grant
M.A.C.E. Unit income in the amount of $6,175.78. The M.A.C.E. Unit income was generated from
confiscating property in drug related activities. The Sheriffs Department will use the funds to
purchase the items as shown in the attachment.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the use of funds for equipment
and authorize the Chairman to sign the Project Generated Income.
TO: Member; of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 006
DATE: January 22, 1999 OMB Director
Entry
Number
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
REVENUE
MULTI-JUR REVENUE/
Cash Forward
126-000-389-040.00
$6,176
$0
EXPENSE
MULTI-JURJSheriff/
Other Machinery & Equipment
126-600-521-066.49 1
$6,176 1
$0 11
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the use of funds for
equipment and authorized the Chairman to sign the
Project Generated Income Report and Agreement, as
recommended by staff.
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.H. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENI)MENT #007
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 26, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: January 26, 1999
SUBJECT: NUSCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 007
CONSENT AGENDA
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Analyst
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
1. Since FY 1994/95 a fiord transfer from Rental Assistance to the IRC Housing Authority
has been used annually to supplement the authority's revenues. Prior to this time, the
General Fund provided the transfer. Rental Assistance was intended as the source of the
fiord transfer as long as the department could absorb the expense. This year it is
necessary for the General Fund to provide part of the transfer. The attached entry
appropriates funding -
2. Indian River County funds &portion of the Circuit Court Administrator's annual budget
as determined by the State of Florida. The County has not paid the amount due for FY
97/98, and thus has to pay for two years of obligation in the current fiscal year. Funding
will come from the General Fund contingency.
3. Chairs in the Commission chambers and office need replacement. The attached entry
appropriates fimding from the General Fund contingency.
4. The current Code Enforcement software is not Y2K compliant and needs to be replaced.
Funding will come from the Municipal Services Taxing Unit contingency.
5. Friends of the Library has committed to donating $6,048 to the Library to pay for copier
lease payments. The attached entry appropriates funding.
6. On September 22, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved an EMS County
Awards Grant in the amount of $40,268.27. The attached entry appropriates the use of
funds.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
-15- 800K � �.�
800K 108 Put 240
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget
amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget
Amendment #007, as recommended by staff.
TO: Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 007
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird DATE: January 26. 1999
OMB Director
Entry
Number
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
REVENUES
SECTION 8 -RENTAL ASSISTANCE/ Low Income
Housing Assistance
108-000-331-057.00
$85,000
EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND/ Fund Transfers Out
001-199-581-099.21
$85,000
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$85,000
SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE/ Fund
Transfers Out
108-222-581-099.21
$85,000
2.
EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND/ Circuit Court/ Other Contractual
Services
001-901-516-033.49
$56,000
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$56,000
3.
EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND/ Commissioners/ Office
Furniture & Equipment
001-101-511-066.41
$4,300
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$4,300
4.
EXPENDITURES
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Code
Enforcement/ Computer Software
004207-524-035.12
$30,000
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Reserve
for Contingencies
004199-581-099.91
$30,000
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 007
DATE: January 26. 1999
Entry
Number Funds/Department/Account Name Account NumberES6,048
Decrease
5. REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Donations - Main Library 001-000-366-095.0
EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/ Rent -Office
Equipment 001-109-571-034.4
6. REVENUES 1
II _IReEME ue�� SERVICES DISTRICT/ EMS Grant I 114-000-334290.00 1 $40,269 �I
EXPENDITURES
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Advanced
Life Support/ Office Furniture & Equipment 114-253-526-037.23 $29,182
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Advanced
Life Support/ Other Mach. & Equipment 114-253-526-037.24 $4,250
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Advanced
Life Support/ Other Operating Supplies 114-253-526-037.31 $6,837
7.L DISTRICT 19 MEDICAL EXAMINER -REAPPOINTMENT OF DR
FREDERICK P. HOBIN - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LA W
ENFORCEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 8, 1998:
Florida Departrnent of Medical Examiners Commission P.O. Box 1489
Law Enforcement Tallahassee, FL 32302
DIUMMUTIPJIM (850) 410-8300
James T. -Tim' Moore commissia-lams -1-3 http:/Awww.fdie.state.tl.us
Commissioner
December 8, 1998
Chairperson
Indian River County Commission
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Sir/Madam:
Administrator
Attorney
Personnel
Comrrlur. f liyt,�
Finarim
Emarg. Serv.
Fi3k Mgt.
Other
The gubernatorial appointment term of the District Medical Examiner in District 19 (Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee,
and St Lucie Counties) will expire on July 1, 1999. Pursuant to Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 110-5.004(2),
the Medical Examiners Commission will consider recommending to the Governor the incumbent, Dr. Frederick P.
Hobin, or other qualified candidates for this appointment So that the Commission can make an informed decision, they
are asking for your input on this matter.
The topic is scheduled for discussion at the 1999 Spring Commission Meeting. As such, it would be appreciated if your
office would complete the enclosed Reappointment Ballot Form and send it back to this office by January 15, 1999.
Please indicate your concurrence or non -concurrence with the recommendation for Dr. Hobin's reappointment You are
invited to submit the names) of any other qualified candidate(s) that you want considered for this appointment
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-17- BOOK 108 PAGE4041
BOOK 108 PAGE 242
For your convenience we have included a self-addressed, stamped envelope for the return of the farm. If you have any
questions or if you wish to discuss your input, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
James T. Moore
Commissioner
Dale H. Heideman
Forensic Coordinator
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved completion of the
Recommendation for Reappointment, authorized the
Chairman to execute same, and approved returning
the form to the Florida Department of Law
Enforcement.
COPY OF FORM IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. J. PLANNING AND ZONING CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD - APPOINTMENT
OF WILLIAM C. BOOZE, At
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 6, 1999:
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 - 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Gentlemen,
January 6, 1999
I am very interested in serving on the Planting and Zoning Code Enforcement Board. I
have over thirty years of experience in all phases of the Construction Industry. I have lived in
Vero Beach for the last five years and believe I am well qualified to serve Indian River County in
this capacity and would consider it a privilege and honor to do so.
Rita and Joyce, employees .in your office, have my resume on file. They requested me to
submit this cover letter.
Thank You,
William C. Booze, Jr.
9145 - 107th Court
Vero Beach, Florida
32967
Commissioner Adams questioned whether the Board involved was the Code
Enforcement Board or the Planning Board and there was no clarification given.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
0 •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously tabled the matter until the correct
Board could be ascertained.
7X PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT -RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attomef
DATE: January 22, 1999
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the weeks of January 11 and January 18, 1999. Listed below are the vendors names and the
amount of each court related costs.
Kevin MacWilliam, Esq.
Legal Services
264.00
Washington �Mutual
Record Reseach
10.45
Michael D. Bell, M.D.
Expert Witness
?56.66
900.00
Nancy Dondero
Investigator
2,255.20
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
80.50
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts - Juvenile
3,000.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts - Misdem.
1,200.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts - Felony
4,200.00
Celeste L. Hartsfield
Transcription
24.00
Jeannie Hazellief
Transcription
73.50
Celeste L. Hartsfield
Transcription
213.00
Ralph Mora, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Barbara G. Schopp
Transcription
84.00
Barbara G.Schopp
Transcription
52.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
192.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
42.00
Fairwinds Travel
Witness travel
224.00
Lenora J. Mergler
Transcription
14.00
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
168.00
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Expert Witness
300.00
Big Dipper Production
Tape enhancement
35.00
Rudy Mantel & Associates
Expert Witness
2,532.00
Lenora J. Mergler
Transcription
105.00
Total
$17,219.65
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-19-BOOK FAGSc,D
BOOK 108 FAG-
ZL. BID #9038 - FURNISH & INSTALL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP INCLUDING
ELECTRICAL WIRING - SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE - PARAGON
ELECTRIC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 21, 1999:
DATE: January 21, 1999
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator /, ,,
FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manager �J
SUBJECT: Bid Award. IRC Bid #9038 r'
Furnish & Install (1) Submersible Pump Including Electrical Wiring
Sandridge Golf Course
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
Specifications Mailed to:
Replies:
"No Bid" Response:
VENDOR
Paragon Electric
Vero Beach, Fl
Reliable Irrigation
Vero Beach, Fl
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID
SOURCE OF FUNDS
ESTIMATED BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
December 30, 1998
December 15, and 22, 1998
Twenty Two - (22) Vendors
Two (2) Vendors
One
BID TOTAL
$24,245.00
$26,000.00
$24,245.00
Sandridge Golf Course = (418-000-166-002-00)
$20,000.00
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Paragon Electric, as the lowest most responsive and responsible
bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #9038 to furnish and
install a submersible pump including electrical
wiring at Sandridge Golf Course to Paragon Electric
in the amount of $24,245, as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-20-
8. SHERIFF GARY WHEELER - PROPOSED ALARM
ORDINANCE - REDUCTION OF FALSE ALARMS
The Board reviewed letters of January 13 and January 21, 1999:
�bprfff
4055 41st AVENUE
January 13, 1999
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32860-1808
J AN i 5 1999
C
p v1taIISozoN
The Honorable Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
RE: PROPOSED ALARM ORDINANCE: REDUC'T'ION OF FALSE ALARMS
Dear Mr. Macht:
PHONE (561) 569-6700
Accompanying the growth our county has faced over the last few years, a multitude of challenges
presents itself in providing responsive law enforcement and quality service, both of which our
citizens have come to expect, and rightfully so. As Sheriff of Indian River County, the safety of
our citizens and the quality of life within our community is of vital importance to me. I know
the Board shares this concern so I would like to share the following information with you.
One of the biggest challenges that law enforcement must face is the security of its residences and
businesses. Most people fear crime and the potential for crime and many of them have installed
alarm systems in hopes that it will prevent them and their families from becoming victims. With
the advancement of technology, reduced pricing and increased competition, more and more
alarms are installed everyday. Naturally, with more systems there will be an increase in false
alarms. At the national level, approximately 97% of all alarms tum out to be false.
Each false alarm consumes valuable time from the officer on the street, increases risks of
accidents, reduces police service to areas with a greater need for law enforcement presence and
through sheer volume instills complacency in the responding officers. This is not a local
problem, rather an industry wide concern. In 1990, the Sheriffs Office responded to over 5,200
alarms or approximately 12% of the total calls for service. In 1996, the number of alarm calls
increased 57% to over 8,240 calls or 18% of the total calls for service. This increase in alarm
calls has impacted the man-hours consumed at a proportional rate. At an average of 25 minutes
consumed per call, vital resources are taken from other calls, increasing response times and
availability of officers to respond to emergencies. Since the nature of alarm calls requires
immediate response, officers respond to all alarm calls in an increased state of readiness; the
nature of some alarm calls requires the dispatch of 2 or more officers. This rapidly depletes the
availability of existing resources for other emergencies or for proactive patrols and quality of life
policing issues. The proportion of alarm calls to the entire call load is so great that an average of
15 minutes out of every hour 24 hours a day is consumed responding to some type of alarm. In
addition to being a safety issue and resource allocation problem, false alarms are expensive to the
community. When one considers that the vast majority (97%) are false, it is wise to look for
responsible solutions to the rising problem.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-21-
0
to 108 pw 245
Boa 108 PAGE246 7
The alarm industry, the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) and the National
Sheriffs Association (NSA) have joined efforts and are working together to reduce the problem
of false alarms. In October 1994, at the IACP Conference in Albuquerque, NM., the Model
Cities Program was developed. The program's objective is to combat the growing concern about
false alarms. Three cities were selected: Bellevue, WA; Elgin, EL; and Philadelphia, PA.
Through a proactive approach with the alarm companies and the communities in partnership,
there was a substantial reduction of false alarms in all three communities. The IACP, NSA and
the alarm industry want to share these strategies and successes with other jurisdictions in the
country. As a result, the Model States Program developed out of the Model Cities Program.
Again, the objective of the Model States Program is to develop a consensus and a working
relationship between the alarm industry in the Model States and the law enforcement community.
The Program finds the causes of false dispatches and identifies reduction programs, applying
corrective actions and measuring the progress of the false dispatch reduction program. This
includes ordinances, state licensing laws, community education and a response methodology that
includes software aimed at identifying alarm owners and malfunction histories or chronic
abusers. The states selected by IACP and NSA for the Model States Program are Florida,
Missouri, Illinois and Washington.
As you can see, there has been a tremendous effort by both law enforcement and the security
industry to work together to address the problem of false alarms. Mr. Stan Martin, Vice
President of Industry Relations for ADI, has been appointed the National False Alarm
Coordinator for the Alarm Industry Research & Education Foundation, which is funding the
program and provides for the support, software, and guidance for participating agencies. Locally,
as we attempt to address the false alarm problem, we are fortunate to have the assistance and
expertise of Mr. Ron Walters, Florida's Model State Program Coordinator. With Mr. Walters'
assistance and unique perspective of both the alarm industry and law enforcement, we have been
able to draft an ordinance that we believe will meet everyone's needs. Part of this effort included
a meeting with the alarm companies hosted at the Sheriffs Office on December 16, 1998. As a
result of that meeting, valuable input from the companies present led to changes in the draft.
In proposing this solution, we hope to ensure that the alarm industry can continue to provide a
deterrent to criminals. Responsible alarm companies provide a valuable service to their
customers providing a sense of security that we hope will continue. We are convinced that
through alarm dealer/user education and appropriate accountability, the citizens of Indian River
County will actually increase their own level of law enforcement service through optimal use of
police resources.
In closing, I would like to thank the Board of County Commissioners in advance for your vision
in considering the proposed ordinance that will go before you. Should you have any questions,
Please feel,free to contact me at 569-6700, ext. 404.
Sincerely,
Ar e. �L)44 -
Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
6berif f
GARY C. WHEELER
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBEP °LOR IDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASsv^CIATION
4055 41 St AVENUE VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960.1606
PHONE (561) 569-6700
January 21, 1999
The Honorable Kenneth R Macht, Chairman
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3394
RE: PROPOSED ALARM RDINANCE. REDUCTION OF FALSE ALARMS
Dear Mr. Macht:
On Friday, January 15, 1999, representatives from my office were invited to attended a meeting
held by the Legislative Committee of the Chamber of Commerce. At this meeting, the proposed
alarm reduction ordinance was discussed. The committee gave us the opportunity to share our
concerns from a law enforcement perspective, identify the desired goals of the false alarm
reduction ordinance; and, in return, we received some excellent feedback from members of the
committee.
We certainly appreciate the opportunity we were given to address the committee and would like
to respond to some of their recommendations. We believe that some of the alternatives offered at
the meeting can be successfully implemented. As such, we would like to address the following
changes to the draft. Noted changes are underlined in the attached draft and are summanzed
below:
Page 3: SECTION 3. PERMIT REQUIRED; APPLICATION; FEE;
TRANSFERABILITY; FALSE STATEMENTS, (B)
The annual registration with updated information will still be required for
Purposes of maintaining accurate information, but the recurring annual permit fee
of $30.00 will be eliminated. Initial permit fee will remain $30.00.
Page 9: Section 12. FINES
Eliminate the non -response clause; and, instead, impose heavier fines at the level
of the 5th false alarm; invoke the revocation of the alarm permit and any
applicable, fines for operation of an alarm system without a permit, as Provided for
in the current draft,
These proposed modifications will still allow us to meet our goal of reducingfalse al
Will do so in a manner that will provide a win:win solution for all parties cocerned. alarms,
It
would like to thank the Board of County Commissioners in advance for your consideration Again, I the
Proposed ordinance that will go before you. Should you have any questions, please feel flee oft
he me at 569-6700, ext. 404.
Sincerely,
Z�L (f - e-J44z"
Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-23-
BOOK i U pmu 247
6a11KJ08 %E 248 -1
Sheriff Gary Wheeler noted that he has been receiving input from Crime Watch,
Neighborhood Watch, the alarm industry, as well as private citizens and businesses for over
a year in an attempt to tailor the ordinance to fit our County. 97% to 99% of all alarms are
false, usually caused by user error. 10% of these calls are caused by equipment failure, 5%
by weather, and 5% miscellaneous. In 1990, the Sheriff's department answered 5,232 alarm
calls; in 1996 8,240; and in 1998 10,000. That is a 91% increase. Deputies are spending 15
minutes of every hour responding to these calls. There has been tremendous growth in the
alarm industry, mostly due to improved systems and reduction in pricing.
Sheriff Wheeler continued that his department has been working with the Model
States Program which includes the states of Florida, Missouri, Illinois, Washington and
California. This program was designed to see what the causes of false alarms are and to
make suggestions for reduction in responding to false alarms. Results from the Model States
Program show a 40% to 60% reduction in false alarms in the first year.
Sheriff Wheeler added that administration of the ordinance would require a clerical
worker to handle the records. He then introduced Ronald Walters, Florida Committee for
Model States Program, Coordinator for the Florida Executive Board, and Bob Sammons, of
the Alarm Association.
Ronald Walters, 9500 Northwest 19°i Street, Pembroke Pines, FL, Coordinator for
the Florida Executive Board of the Model States Program, noted that the program is taken
to law enforcement agencies initially at no cost to the agencies. We know that 99% of
alarms are false and we know that 48% of these false alarms are caused by less than 10% of
users. He believed that penalties for false alarms need to be severe but will only affect a
small percentage of the population.
Chairman Macht asked how many alarm companies operate in the County, and Mr.
Walters responded that no records are kept. These companies can come into town and do
one job and then leave. There are also companies who work here but do not have customers
in the County.
Bob Sammons, 529 Dahlia Lane, Vero Beach, stated that the alarm industry never
expected to grow this big or have this many problems. The Executive Board of the Model
States Program is doing a fabulous job and he was very impressed with the proposed
ordinance. He believed that a permit renewal fee should be included in the ordinance, as
well as a registration fee, and felt that the small percentage of the population causing most
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
of the false alarms should pay for administration of the program, rather than the general
taxpayers. He was in favor of the program and noted that Palm Beach County has 70,000
alarms and is averaging a 15% increase per year.
Penny Chandler, of the Chamber of Commerce, 1216 21' Street, stated that'they
have worked with the Sheriff on this ordinance and urged the Board to adopt the program.
A lot of unnecessary time is being spent by deputies responding to these false alarms.
Commissioner Adams questioned the One Plus Duress Alarm in Section 2(P):
(P) One Plus Duress Alarm means the manual activation of a silent alar signal by
entering at a keypad a code that adds one to the last digit of the normal arm/disarm code (normal
code =1234 one plus duress code =1235).
Mr. Walters explained that this is a way to turn off the alarm system at the premises
but still send a silent signal which the Sheriff's department would respond to. This feature
is generally found in the older alarm equipment.
General discussion ensued regarding fees and fines and user awareness classes:
SECTION 11. FALSE ALARM USER AWARENESS CLASS.
The administrator shall oversee the creation and implementation of a false alarm user
awareness class. The program shall inform alar users of the problems created by false alarm
dispatchers and teach alarm users how to operate their alar systems without generating false
alar dispatches. The Alar Review Board may waive fines and recommend the awareness
class. The class will be held at different times to allow attendance and to minimize scheduling
conflicts.
There shall be a $35.00 administrative fee to attend the class; the fee will cover costs
associated with conducting the course, including all informational materials and handouts.
SECTION 12. FINES.
(A) An alar user or the master permit holder for an apartment complex shall be
subject to fines, warnings an suspension or revocation of permit depending on the number of
false alarm dispatches emitted from an alarm system within a 12 -month period based upon the
following schedule:
Number of False
Alarm Dispatches
4
5 and above
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
On site written notice/ warning letter #1
On site written notice/ warning letter #2
On site written notice/ warning letter #3
(May be waived if school attended)
On site written notice/ warning letter #4
(Mandatory attendance of school)
On site written notice of revoked permit
(Subsequent false dispatches will be i-med as
operating a non-permited system; additional
violation fees may apply accordingly)
Fines
No Fee
No Fee
$100.00
$175.00
$250.00 ea
-25- -OINK ACL
BOOK 108 WE- 250
Commissioner Adams then noted that Section 2(D) regarding the Alarm Review
Board calls for 2 at large members to be appointed by the other 3 members:
(D) Alarm Review Board shall consist of five members as follows: the Alarm
Administrator, a representative appointed by the Sheriff, a local alarm business representative
appointed by the local alarm association, and two (2).members of the public at large, alloin nted
by the other three (3) members
Commissioner Adams preferred that the Sheriff appoint those at -large positions and
believed that there should be strict guidelines for the Review Board to consider when
waiving fines as set forth in Section 13:
SECTION 13. APPEAL FROM FINES/ GRIEVANCE PROCESS
(A) An alarm user may appeal assessment of a fine to the Alarm Review Board by
filing a written request for a hearing setting forth the reasons for the appeal within ten (10)
working days after receipt of the fine. The filing of a request for an appeal hearing with the
Alarm Review Board stays the assessment of the fine until the Alarm Review Board makes a
final decision.
(B) The Alarm Review Board shall conduct a formal hearing and consider the
evidence by any interested person(s). The board shall make its decision on the basis of the
preponderance of evidence presented at the hearing including, but not limited to, evidence that a
false alarm dispatch was caused by a defective part that has been repaired or replaced or that an
alarm dispatch request was caused by criminal offense. The Board shall reserve the right to call
upon the respective alarm company to provide a representative in order to verify attempts to
correct/not correct a failed system. The board must render a decision within thirty (30) days after
the request for an appeal hearing is filed. The board shall affirm, reverse or modify the
assessment of the fine, and/or inlcude attendance at the false alarm awareness school. The
decision of the Board is final as to administrative remedies.
Commissioner Adams also noted that the Review Board will become quasi-judicial
and they will need to understand the procedures involved.
Commissioner Adams then asked for an example of the consequences of a violation,
and County Attorney Vitunac responded that violation of a County ordinance is punishable
by a fine of up to $500 per incident and up to 6 months in jail.
Commissioner Ginn questioned the language in Section 5(C) requiring notarization,
and County Attorney Vitunac advised there is no legal reason for that requirement so it can
be deleted.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the revisions to the proposed
Ordinance and authorized the advertisement for
public hearing, as recommended by staff.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-26-
0
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP
FROM RS -6 AND RM -6 TO RM -8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 41ST STREET AND THE WEST
SIDE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - SCHWERIN
REALTY CO., PAT BOBO MILES, DOUGLAS AND DOLORES
DUBEAU, ROBIN BOBO LONCARIE, AND CHRISTINE BOBO
SIKES, TRUSTEE
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 25, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
P TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
o ert M. Keatin , MCP
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP �'%%•
.7
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: John WachtelU ""
Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: January 25, 1999
RE: Schwerin Realty Company and Others Request to Rezone Approximately 29.5
Acres from RM -6 and RS -6 to RM -8 (RZON 98-10-0061)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 2, 1999.
This request is to rezone approximately 29.5 acres to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District
(up to 8 unitslacre). The western 28.8 acres of the site are currently zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family
Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), while the eastern 0.7 acres of the site are currently zoned
RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).
Somewhat irregularly shaped, the subject property is depicted on attachment 2 and is generally
located near the northwest corner of the intersection of 41' Street (South Gifford Road) and Indian
River Boulevard. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site
with a residential use at a density that is consistent with its comprehensive plan land use designation.
On November 12, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to RM -8.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
-27- BooK u PAGE
L
Fr- I
Boa 108 PnE 25
The subject property and all surrounding property consist of citrus groves and are zoned either RM -6
or RS -6. The boundary between the RM -6 and RS -6 zoning districts is perpendicular to 4151 Street
and is located approximately 780 feet west of the 415` Street/Indian River Boulevard intersection.
The subject property and all surrounding properties north of41' Street are designated M-1, Medium -
Density Residential -1, on the county future land use map. The M-1 designation permits residential
uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. As part of the county's evaluation and appraisal process,
properties south of the subject property, across 41' Street, were recently redesignated from M-1 to
C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on the county future land use map. The C/I designation permits various
commercial and industrial zoning districts. In the future, the county plans to rezone that property
to the MED, Medical, zoning district.
The subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive
by the comprehensive plan. No wetlands or native upland plant communities exist on site.
According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard
areas.
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater service is available to the site
from the Central Region Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water service is available to the
site from the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant.
The site can be accessed by both Indian River Boulevard and 41' Street. Classified as an urban
principal arterial on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, the segment of Indian River
Boulevard that abuts the subject property is a four lane road with approximately 200 feet of public
road right-of-way. No improvements to this portion of Indian River Boulevard are currently
programmed.
The site is also bounded by 41' Street, an urban collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare
plan map. A paved two lane road, 41' Street has approximately 100 feet of public road right-of-way.
No improvements to this portion of 41' Street are currently programmed.
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented.
Specifically, this section will include:
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation.. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive
Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development be reviewed
to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-28-
•
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's
LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property
and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency
analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned:
2. Existing Zoning Districts:
3. Proposed Zoning District:
4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning Districts:
5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District:
- Transportation
129.5 acres
RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to
6 units/acre) and RS -6, Single -Family Residential
District (up to 6 units/acre)
RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to
8 units/acre)
177 Single -Family Units
236 Single -Family Units
As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA
reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips
to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as
roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more
project trips, whichever is less.
According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roads would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 236 single-family units on the subject property.
- Water
With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 236 residential units, resulting
in water consumption at a rate of 236 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 59,000 gallons/day.
This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property
would be served by the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining
capacity of approximately 2,400,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand
generated by the proposed rezoning.
- Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property
will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 236 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU),
or 59,000 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day.
County wastewater service is available to the site from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 1,300,000 gallons/day and can
accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request.
- Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The
county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/ year. With
the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 236 unit residential development would
be anticipated to house approximately 543 people (2.3 X 236). For the -subject request to meet the
county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have
enough capacity to accommodate approximately 1,070 (543 X 1.97) cubic yards/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of more than 830,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year
capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff
deteranned that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed zoning district.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-29-
•
BOOK 108 PAGE 253
A
Fr
BOOK 108 FACE 254 "
- Drainage
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stor mwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance. Any development on the subject property will be prohibited from
discharging any runoff in excess of the pre -development rate.
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standard does not apply, since the property
does not he within a floodplain. On-site retention and discharge standards, however, do apply to this
request. With the most intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface under the
proposed zoning classification will be approximately 20.65 acres. The estimated runoff volume,
based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, will be
approximately 882,350 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the
applicant will be required to retain approximately 241,930 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil
characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is
149.61 cubic feet/second.
Based upon staffs analysis, the drainage level of service standards will be met by limiting off-site
discharge to its pre -development rate of 149.61 cubic feet/second, and requiring retention of 241,930
cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property.
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval
Process.
- Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most
intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates
that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The following table illustrates the additional
park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus park
acreage.
PARK INFORMATION
LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population)
Project Demand (Acres)
Surplus Park Acreage
4.0
2.1712
232
Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities,
including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to
accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district.
Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies.
- Future Land Use Element Objective I
Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern
which reduces urban sprawl. Since the proposed rezoning is to increase the allowed density of land
within the urban service area, the request works to create a more compact land use pattern within the
urban service area By increasing the allowed density of land currently within the urban service area,
as opposed to expanding the urban service area, the proposed rezoning reduces the chances urban
sprawl will occur. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element
Objective 1.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-30-
0 0
•
- Future Land Use Element Policies 1.13 and 1.14
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.14 states that the M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 unitstacre. In addition, Future Land
Use Element Policy 1.13 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service
area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as M-1 on the county's future land
use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district
would allow residential uses no greater than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M-1 designation, the
proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.13 and, 1.14.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2
Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into
the urban service area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and
encourage more development on the subject property and the subject property is within the urban
service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2.
- Future Land Use Element Objective 4
Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of
trips on county roads.
The site is located adjacent to or near several of the county's largest employment centers, including
the US 1/37' Street Hospital Node and the Vero Beach Municipal Airport. Many people who work
in those employment centers live in moderately -priced, low to medium density housing. The RM -8
zoning district is intended for such uses. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the
opportunity for people who work in those areas to live near their jobs, thus reducing the length of
their trips to and from work. For this reason, the request implements Future Land Use Element
Objective 4.
- Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1
Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 state that the county will increase densities in
the urbanized area and along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass transit
provision. Since the proposed rezoning will increase the allowed density along and near several
major transportation corridors, this request implements Transportation Element Objective 11 and
Policy 11.1.
As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and
policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with the
comprehensive plan.
Because the subject property is nearly surrounded by either major roads or other multiple -family
zoning districts, compatibility is not a major concern with respect to this request. Although several
citrus groves currently abut the subject property, the county anticipates that those groves will
eventually be converted to residential uses.
Staffs position is that multiple -family residential development is appropriate for the site and that
such development would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Located adjacent to the US
1/37`x' Street Hospital node and near the Vero Beach Municipal Airport, the subject property is
particularly well suited to meet the demand for multiple -family housing generated by those
employment centers. In effect, the proposed rezoning would increase the opportunity for people to
live near their place of employment.
With most of the site already zoned for multiple -family uses, this request is primarily for a density
increase (consistent with the comprehensive plan). Since the density increase meets the concurrency
test and is consistent with the site's future land use designation, the request is not anticipated to
negatively impact surrounding areas. For these reasons, stafffeels the requested zoning district
would be compatible with adjacent residential development. _
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
-31- BOOK 108 FAGE255
BOOK 108 m, 5
Being a citrus grove, the site has been altered. Since the subject property contains no
environmentally important land, such as wetlands or sensitive uplands, development of the site is
anticipated to have little or no impact on environmental quality. For this reason, no adverse
environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated.
Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with
surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will
have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria Most
importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for medium -density multiple -
family residential uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to RM -8.
William Caldwell, 756 Beachland Boulevard, Vero Beach, Attorney for the
Applicant, asked for a postponement to March 9, 1999.
County Attorney Vitunac advised the Chairman to open the public hearing and asked
for a requirement for the applicant to re -advertise because of the length of the delay.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman recessed the public hearing until
March 9, 1999.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously recessed the public hearing until March
9, 1999, with the condition that the matter be re -
advertised for that date.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-32-
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TREASURE COAST FOOD
BANK. INC. - REQUEST FOR FUNDING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 27, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: January 27, 1999
SUBJECT: TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK, INC. REQUEST FOR FUNDING
FROM: Joseph A. Bair
OMB Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Treasure Coast Food Bank is requesting an emergency agency grant in the amount of $9,500.00 to
renovate the Treasure Coast Food Bank warehouse. In August 1998 the Treasure Coast Food Bank
purchased and moved into the facility at 1102 S. U.S. Highway # 1 in Ft. Pierce which unfortunately needs
renovation.
Their projections for these renovations are as follows:
Air Conditioning
$18,900.00
Cameting
$5,900.00
Electrical Repairs
$3,500.00
Plumbing
$1,500.00
Locks and Security
$1,050.00
Painting Interior
$2,000.00
Painting Exterior
$9,500.00
New Roof
$35.000.00
Fencing
$1,500.00
Lot Paving
5 000.00
Si a e
$1,500.00
Contractor
$8,900.00
Moving Expenses
$1,500.00
TOTAL
.750.00
They applied to counties for funding using a formula that was based on the emergency food distributions
that were made in each area. They were as follows:
Counix AmountReauested Action
Martin $24,900.00 Turned Down
St. Lucie $39,250.00 $5,000 roved
Okeechobee 24 00.00 Turned Down
Tndian River ig-sno-on Pending
ANALYSIS
The Budget Director does not recommend funding the $9,500 to the Treasure Coast Food Bank for the
following reasons:
1. Other counties have not approved paying their fair share of the Treasure Coast Food Bank's
request.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-33- non 108 FnE 257
Fr- -I
BOOK 108 pw 258
ANALYSIS - continued
2. Indian River County has a policy that in April of each fiscal year all agencies submit requests
for the following year's budget. Every year agency's requests exceed the money that is
available. Many agencies are denied or their budget requests are reduced. This request is for
renovating a building purchased in August of 1998. The food bank should have known in April
of 1998 that they were intending to purchase and move into the facility and could have submitted
an agency packet in April 1998 with all other agencies requesting funding
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners deny the request and encourage the Treasure
Coast Food Bank to apply for funding with other agencies in April 1999 for the 1999/2000 fiscal year.
Brenda Noel, Executive Director of Treasure Coast Food Bank, Inc., asked for a
withdrawal of their petition at this time and noted that they will re -apply at the proper time
for budget requests.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
11.B. CITY OF VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF AND
PENSION FUND - PROPOSED BENEFIT CHANGES AND
REALIGNMENT OF INVESTMENT GUIDELINES AUTHORIZED
IN CHANGES TO CHAPTER 175, FLORIDA STATUTES,
PERTAINING TO MUNICIPAL FIRE PENSION PLANS
The Board reviewed Memoranda of December 21, 1998 and January 3, 1999:
TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the
Indian River County Commission
FROM: Thomas R. Nason, Chairman
Board of Trustees of the City of Vero Beach
Firefighters Relief and Pension Fund
DATE: December 21, 1998
SUBJECT: Proposed benefit changes and realignment of the investment, guidelines
authorized in the most recent changes in Florida Statutes, Chapter 175 as it
pertains to Municipal Fire Pension Plans
During the August 19, 1998 meeting of the pension board, the board unanimously
approved the actuary exploring the fiscal impact of changing the plan benefits as follows:
1. Changing the monthly supplemental benefits from the existing rate of $10.00 per
month per year of service to $25.00 per month per year of service. This benefit is
to apply to the already retired members as well as members who will retire in the
future.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
•
0
2. For those members who have not yet retired, the definition of compensation upon
which their pension annuity is based be changed to a percent of total cash
compensation including wages, salaries, bonuses, overtime pay and other
compensation as reported to the United States Internal Revenue Service on each
firefighter's annual W-2 form. Excluded from this calculation are the hump sum
payments received at retirement for accumulated vacation and sick leave payments.
The currently defined compensation is calculated on the annual base pay of each
firefighter. The average compensation used to determine each employee's benefits
is based on the highest 3(three) years compensation received as a firefighter at the
time of his/her retirement. Lump sum payments for sick and annual leave are
exempted from this determination.
In support this change in benefits and we are pleased to submit the following.
1. An Actuarial Impact Statement, provided by the plan actuary
demonstrating that the State revenue alone received by the plan from
insurance premium taxes exceeds the cost of the requested benefits by
$17,042.00 according to the actuarial valuation conducted in accordance
with the data contained in the most recent actuarial plan valuation dated
October 1, 1997. (Note each year this payment increases as the number of
insurance policies increases as well as the valuation of the properties
covered by fire insurance policies increases.)
2. As of October 1, 1997, the plan owned stocks, bonds, cash and other
investments with a market value of $6,267,334.00. As of October 1, 1998
this market value increased to $6,682,790.00. As ofNovember 30, 1998
these investments had grown to $7,185,980.00. This extraordinary growth
is in addition to the financial assumptions used by the actuary in October
1997 valuation study. The market value of the assets has grown by
$918,646.00 in the period of 13 months.
3. In addition to the growth, the plan received a check from the Division of
Retirement for $64,371.23. These monies were from the surplus in funds
taken by the State of Florida, from the local plans, for the administrative
cost of running the Division of Retirement over the previous years.
Consequently, the coverage in owned assets and unforeseen cash payments multiply the
coverage that is available to pay for the requested changes. Thus, it is extremely unlikely that any
employer contribution would ever be required as a result of the requested changes.
In accordance with the revised Chapter 175, Florida Statutes, that became effective
October 1, 1998, the board voted unanimously to change the existing investment guidelines to
conform to the new state rules. This includes memorializing its existing equities investment limit,
at cost, to 50% of the value of the portfolio and further allowing the Investment Manager to
invest up to 10% of the plan assets in foreign securities. (See Attached letter of June 18, 1998
from Patricia F. Shoemaker, State of Florida, Division of Retirement). A copy of the suggested
new Statement of Investment Policy has been enclosed for your review and comment. The
changes in the Investment Policy Statement are not radical, but simply update the prior Statement
along with the addition of the ability to invest in selected high quality foreign equities when it is
advantageous to do so.
The members of the Firemen's Pension Plan sincerely request your review and
concurrence with the above stated changes as outlined in the proposed ordinance of the City of
Vero Beach. The plan benefit changes are well covered by the plan assets as well as with the
increasing contributions from the State of Florida based upon the fire insurance premium tax.
The changes requested in the investment policy of the plan represent a conservative
realignment to the current practices used in pension management as well as conforming to the
rules enacted this year by the Florida legislature. `
Your consideration of these matters is appreciated.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
Thomas R Nason
-35- na. rnr 9
BOOK 108 PAGE 260
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director of Emergency Services
DATE: January 3, 1999
SUBJECT: Proposed Benefit Changes to the Firefighters Relief and Pension Fund and Realignment
of the Investment Guidelines Authorized in Changes to Chapter 175, Florida Statutes,
Pertaining to Municipal Fire Pension Plans
On December 29, 1998, staff received the attached correspondence from Thomas R. Nason, Chairman
of the Board of Trustees of the City of Vero Beach Firefighters Relief and Pension Fund. The
correspondence alluded to proposed changes to the Firefighters Relief and Pension Fund as well as
realignment of the investment guidelines authorized in recent changes to Chapter 175, Florida Statutes,
and was submitted for consideration and approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
The Pension Fund Board of Trustees proposes the following changes:
1. Changing the monthly supplemental benefits from the existing rate of $10.00 per month
per year of service to $25.00 per month per year of service. This benefit is to apply to
the already retired members as well as members who will retire in the future.
2. For those members who have not yet retired, the definition of compensation upon which
their pension annuity is based be changed to a percent of total cash compensation
including wages, salaries, bonuses, overtime pay and other compensation as reported
to the United States Internal Revenue Service on each firefighter's annual W-2 Form.
Excluded from this calculation are the lump sum payments received at retirement for
accumulated vacation and sick leave payments.
The currently defined compensation is calculated on the annual base pay of each
firefighter. The average compensation used to determine each employee's benefits is
based on the highest three years' compensation received as a firefighter at the time of
his/her retirement. Lump sum payments for sick and annual leave are exempted from
this determination.
In accordance with Chapter 175, Florida Statutes (revised) that became effective on
October 1, 1998, the Pension Trustees are changing the existing investment guideline
to conform to the new statutory requirements. This includes memorializing existing
equities investment limit, at cost, to 50% of the value of the portfolio and further
allowing the Investment Manager to invest up to 10% of the plan assets in foreign
securities. A copy of the suggested new Statement of Investment Policy is attached and
it simply updates the prior Statement along with the addition of the ability to invest in
selected high quality foreign equities when it is advantageous to do so.
In support of the proposed change in benefits, Chairman Nason submitted the following information
or documentation:
A. An Actuarial Impact Statement provided by the plan actuary demonstrating that the
State revenue received by the plan front insurance premium taxes exceeds the cost of the
requested benefits by $17,042.00 (Actuarial Plan Valuation dated October 1, 1997). It
is noted in the documentation proved by Chairman Nason that this payment increases
as the number of insurance policies increases was well as the valuation of the properties
covered by fire insurance policies increases.
B. As of October 1, 1997, the plan owned stocks, bonds, cash and other investments with
a market value of $6,267,334.00. As of October 1, 1998, this market value increased
to $6,682,790.00. As of November 30, 1998, the investments had grown to
$7,185,980.00. This extraordinary growth is in addition to the financial assumptions
used by the actuary. in the October, 1997 valuation study. The market value of the assets
has grown by $918,646.00 in the period of 13 months.
C. In addition to the growth, the plan received a check from the Division of Retirement for
$64,371.23. These monies were from the surplus in funds taken by the State of Florida,
from local plans, for the administrative cost of running the Division of Retirement over
the previous years.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-36-
• 0
If the Board of County Commissioners approves the proposed changes as outlined in the proposed
ordinance of the City of Vero Beach, the matter will be considered further by the Vero Beach City
Council. As noted in the documentation, the plan benefit changes appear to be well covered by the
plan assets as well as with the increasing contributions from the State of Florida based upon the fire
insurance premium tax.
Plan Actuary J. Stephen Palmquist and other representatives of the Pension Fund will be in attendance
at the meeting to answer any questions the Board may have.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the documentation and information submitted, staffrecommends the Board favorably consider
the proposed changes.
Plan Actuary J. Stephen Palmquist, of Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company, noted
that one of the changes relates to how pension funds can be invested; there are 2 changes in
benefits; and 1 change in how pensions are calculated. At the present time, pensions are
calculated using the base pay over the last 3 years. The proposed change would use the gross
pay so that overtime could be included. The Plan at the present time has a supplemental
benefit of $10 per year -of -service to assist in paying for health insurance in retirement. The
proposal is to raise that benefit to $25 per year -of -service. The change in the way funds can
be invested follows a change in the State statutes allowing up to 10% of the fund to be
invested in foreign stocks. There is no additional funding required from the County to pay
for these additional benefits.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved the proposed changes, as recommended by
staff.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-37- BOOK 108 tnE 261
BOOK 108 F,GE 262
11.G.1. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
- PHASE I - RELEASE OF RETAINAGE - APPLIED TECHNOLOGY
& MANAGEMENT, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 26, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
FROM: Jeffrey R. Tabar,
Coastal Engineer
SUBJECT: Beach Preservation Plan Economic Analysis
Release of Retainage - Phase I
DATE: January 26, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Phase 1 of the project is complete and the consultant is requesting
release of retainage in the amount of $9,018.49.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends release of retainage in the amount of $9,018.49.
Funding to be from 128-144-572-033.19.
Public Works Director Jim Davis advised that the Memorandum contained a
mathematical error and the corrected figure should be $8,534.60.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved release of retainage in the
amount of $8,534.60 to Applied Technology and
Management, Inc., as recommended by staff.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-38-
11.G.2. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO STATE OF FLORIDA.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY
JURISDICTION TRANSFER AGREEMENT - CR -510 (WABASSO
ROAD) - US 1/SR-5 TO SR A 1 A
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 25, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator January 25, 1999
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Roadway
Jurisdiction Transfer Agreement, Amendment #1 - CR510(Wabasso
Road) - US 1/SR5 to SRA1A
REF. LETTER: Letter to James Davis from Gustavo Schmidt, FDOT dated
January 14, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On July 24, 1997 the Board entered into an agreement with the FDOT
agreeing to pay half the cost of repairs to the Wabasso Road bridge
crossing the Intracoastal Waterway or $150,000, whichever was less.
At that time, the cost of the work was estimated by DOT to be
$300,000. The estimate has come in more than originally
anticipated. Therefore, the FDOT is amending the Agreement to
state that the County will contribute an additional $85,000, or
half the cost of the repairs, whichever is less. The maximum
County share, therefore, is $235,000.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The cost of the work has increased due to the need to replace
seawalls along the river bank. The additional work will benefit
the County after DOT transfers it back to'the County.
RECOMMDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends the Commission approve the attached amendment to
the July 24, 1997 Roadway Jurisdiction Transfer Agreement. Funding
to be from Fund 109 - Secondary Road Fund, Local Option Gas Tax
Revenue.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Amendment to the July
24, 1997 Roadway Jurisdiction Transfer Agreement,
as recommended by staff.
COPY OF AMENDMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-39-
•
BOOK IUB pnn 3
r
BOOK 108 rn-t.264
I LH. 1. INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT
PERMIT AND INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS - 1999 YEARLY
LEASE AGREEMENTS (NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, AND 8)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 21, 1999:
DATE: JANUARY 21,1999
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMIIVLSTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, PE.3
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY
PREPARED
WILLIAM F. MCCAIN
AND STAFFED
CAPITAL PROJE GiNEER
BY:
SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER MANAGEMENT
YEARLY LEASE AGREEMENTS, 1999
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
We are in receipt of our yearly agreements with Indian River Farms Water Management District,
and need to have same executed by the Board of County Commissioners. The total cost of all
agreements is the same as the previous year. The total fee associated with these agreements is
$11,918.52. For details of permits, please reference the attached Indian River Farms Permit List
and Triter -local agreements.
RECON04ENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends Board approval of the later -local
Agreements as presented, and authorize the Chairman to execute same.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Permits and Interlocal
Agreements with Indian River Farms Water Control
District, as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-40-
•
1 1.H.2. 16TH STREET WATER & FORCE MAIN RELOCATION -
CHANGE ORDER #2 AND FINAL PAYMENT - PROJECT UW -98-
02 -DS AND US -98 -03 -CS - DRIVEWAYS, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 14, 1999:
DATE: JANUARY 14, 1999
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTI JTY
PREPARED
MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E.
AND STAFFED
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY:
DEPARTMENT OF UTII= SERVICES
SUBJECT:
16' STREET WATER AND FORCE MAIN RELOCATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NOS. UW -98 -02 -DS
AND US -98 -03 -CS
CHANGE ORDER NO.2 AND FINAL PAYMENT
BACKGROUND
On May 12, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved a labor contract with
Driveways, Inc. in the amount of $48,040.54 and approved purchase of material in the amount of
$17,623.62 for a total construction cost of $65,664.16 to relocate miscellaneous water and force
mains in conflict with a proposed Florida Department of Transportation (DOT) drainage project in
the Rockridge subdivision (see attached minutes of meeting). On October 20, 1998, the BCC
approved Change Order No. 1, which adjusted the total labor contract amount to $74,057.04 and
the total material cost to $19,502.41 (see attached minutes of meeting), for a revised total
construction cost of $93,559.45.
Construction of the project is now complete. During construction, the following additional changes
were encountered:
• Wastewater operations requested the contractor to install two additional isolation valves on the
sewer collector main to minimise the number of customers affected by future outages. An Insta-
Valve was installed at one location under pressure, due to the number of customers impacted by
removing the main from service. A regular isolation valve was install at the other location,
since the affected section of force main had to be relocated and hence, removed from service.
• The contractor discovered that the small diameter force main that had to be relocated was a
different type of PVC material than originally anticipated. Fittings for the antiquated pipe are no
longer available. Consequently, the relocated pipe had to be constructed using ductile iron pipe,
since associated fittings are adaptable to the existing PVC pipe.
• Two of the water main conflicts identified in Change Order No. 1 were not needed, and
eliminated from the contract.
• A section of pipe that had to be replaced was discovered to be asbestos cement (AC) material.
AC pipe has been identified as hazardous material by the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), and is required to be; handled by certified contractors. Since
Driveways, Inc. is not qualified to handle AC pipe, the _health department had to oversee
packaging of the material. This caused a delay in construction until accommodations could be
made to have the hazardous material properly sealed and hauled to the landfill.
We are now requesting approval of Change Order No. 2, and final payment to the contractor.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
E
-41- BOOK PAGE 265
BOOK D8 SAGE 266
ANALYSIS
The attached Change Order No. 2 results in an addition to the labor contract in the amount of
$8,784.47, resulting in a revised labor contract amount of $82,841.51. The additional cost of
material to accommodate Change Order 2 is $16,90329, which adjusts the total cost of material
used on the project to $36,405.70, for a total construction cost of $119,24721.
The contractor was previously paid $39,993.39 for 48% completion, and is requesting final
payment of $42,848.12 for the remainder of the project.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve Change Order No. 2 with Driveways, Inc. in the amount of $8,784.47,
approve final payment to Driveways, Inc. in the amount of $42,848.12, and authorize the Chairman
to execute same, as presented-
ON
resented
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved Change Order No. 2 with Driveways, Inc.
in the amount of $8,784.47; approved final payment
to Driveways, Inc. in the amount of $42,848.12; and
authorized the Chairman to execute the documents,
as recommended by staff.
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13.C. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE D. GINN - APPROVAL
FOR OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL TO PANAMA CITY
FOR REVIEW OF ONGOING BEACH
RENOURISHMENT PROGRAM
Commissioner Ginn requested nominal expenses for out -of -county travel for herself
and Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar. They will be traveling in a private plane so the cost of the
trip will be a percentage of the flight expense. There will be no overnight stay and she has
some interesting materials which she will copy for each of the Commissioners.
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-42-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved out -of -county travel
for Commissioner Ginn and Coastal Engineer Jeff
Tabar to travel to Panama City to review their
ongoing beach renourishment program.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of the Solid Waste
Disposal District Meeting, the Board would reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the
Environmental Control Board. Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 10:13 a.m.
ATTEST:
J. K. arton, Clerk 4nneth!:�RZMacht, Chairman
Minutes Approved: �3 9 9
FEBRUARY 2, 1999
-43- BOOK ma