HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/6/19990 MINUTES ATTACHED or
BOARD OF COUNTY OOMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, APRIL 6,1999 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY CONMESSIONERS
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman (District 1)
Caroline D. Ginn, (District 5)
Ruth Stanbridge (District 2
John W. Tippin, (District 4)
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
BACKUP
2. I WOCATION Rev. Doug Vogt PAGES
First Church of God
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Charles P. Vitunac
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add Item 9.B., Downdrift Coalition (Bob Bruce and Bill Glynn) - Endangered Species Act, Section Ten Action against the
Sebastian Inlet Tax Dishict and the Florida Department of Eavimnmental protection.
2. Add Item D.C., Comments regarding Beach Survey.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation of Appreciation to the Board (BCC)
by Amanda McGee of Children's Home Society
B. Presentation of Proclamation Designating April,
1999 as Keep Indian River Beautiful Month and
Designating April 17, 1999 as Florida Clean -Up
Day in Indian River County, Florida
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of March 2,1999
B. Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999
C. Regular Meeting of March 16,1999
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the
Board: Sebastian Inlet Tax District (1) Annual
Financial Report and FY 1997-98; (2) Compre-
hensive Annual Financial Report for Year Ended
9/30/98, and (3) Proposed Meeting Schedule for
FY 1998-99
B. Approval of Wan -ants
(memorandum dated March 18, 1999)
1
2-11
BOOK '' FAGE 800
Tri
BOOK 103 f'AOE SJJ.
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.Z PAGES
C. Approval of Wan -ants
(memorandum dated March 25, 1999) 12-22
D. Request for Board Approval of Florida Communities
Trust (FCT) Cost -Share Agreement Extension for the
Round Island Soutli-LAAC Site
(memorandum dated March 31, 1999) 23-27
E. Kennedy Groves, Inc.'s Request for Final Plat
Approval for Old Orchid Phase I Planned Development
(memorandum dated March 29,1999) 28-44
F. Request for County Resolution Supporting Federal
Acquisition of Lier Groves, Earing Point Groves,
and Pryor Properties on North Jungle Trail as a Buffer
to the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge
(memorandum dated March 30, 1999) 45-50
G. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver
for Pelican Pointe, Phase II Planned Development
(memorandum dated March 29, 1999) 51-55
H. Creative Choice Homes LTD's Request for Extension
of Conceptual Site Plan Approval
(memorandum dated March 22, 1999) 56-61
I. First Baptist Church of Winter Beach Request for
Extension of Conceptual Site Plan Approval for a
Place of Worship
(memorandum dated March 22, 1999) 62-67
J. City of Vero Beach's Request for Extension of Site
Plan Approval for an Electrical Substation
(memorandum dated March 22,1999) 68-73
K. Bid Award: IRC #9050 / Laser Shaft Alignment Tool
(Utilities Dept.)
(memorandum dated March 29,1999) 74-79
L. Re -Award of the Four (4) Type III Ambulances for
Emergency Services Ambulance Division
(memorandum dated March 29,1999) 80-93
M. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012
(memorandum dated March 31, 1999) 94-95
N. Children's Services Network Annual Report 10-1-97
thru 9-30-98
(memorandum dated March 30,1999) 96-108
O. Payment to F.D.E.P. - Administrative Fees Owed
for Leases
(letter dated March 30, 1999) 109
P. Law Enforcement Trust Fund
(letter dated March 26, 1999) 110-111
Q. City of V. B. Appointments to County Committees
(memorandum dated March 22, 1999) 112-115
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA kont'd.Z PAGES
R Annual County Tax Deed Applications
(memorandum dated March 15, 1999) 116-122
S. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated March 19,1999) 123-124
T. Recently Acquired Property - Tax Cancellation
(memorandum dated March 19,1999) 125-131
U. Appointment of a Representative to Mediation
(memorandum dated March 30,1999) 132-133
V. Request for Final Plat Approval for Cypress
Lakes Phase II Planned Development
(memorandum dated March 31, 1999) 134-145
W. Airmasters Lease at Fairgrounds
(memorandum dated March 31, 1999) 145A -145C
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Paving & Drainage Improvements to Is'
St. Between 16'' Ave. & 18" Ave.
(memorandum dated March 26, 1999) 146-152
2. Paving & Drainage Improvements to 18"
Ave. Between 1' Place & 2°d Street
(memorandum dated March 11, 1999) 153-159
3. Weston Real Estate Investment Corp.'s
Request for Conceptual PD Plan and Special
Exception Use Approval for a 176 Unit
Planned Development to be Known as
Bermuda Club (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 25, 1999) 160-189
4. County Initiated Request to Rezone ±37
Acres from RS -1 to Con -1; And to Rezone a
Separate ±15.8 Acres From RS -1 to Con -1
(Legislative)
(memorandum dated March 25, 1999) 190-213
5. John W. Mitchell and Others' Request to
Rezone Approximately 2 Acres from CH to
CL (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 24,1999) 214-225
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
BOOK FADE
i
L
BOOK 108 FA't 303
BACKUP
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS PAGES
A. Community Develogment
1. Approval of Dates for Two Board Hearings
to Consider LDR Amendments
(memorandum dated March 23,1999) 226-227
2. Consideration of Code Enforcement Board
Action on Pot Bellied Pigs
(memorandum dated March 25, 1999) 228-232
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
Purchasing Policy
(memorandum dated March 29,1999) 233-235
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Right -of -Way Acquisition / 58th Avenue
Improvements / Oslo Road to 26th Street
Parcel No. 117, Abraham & Charlotte Barkett
(memorandum dated March 23, 1999) 236-242
2. Proposed Amendments to City of V. B./ I.R.C.
Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement
(memorandum dated March 22,1999) 243-249
3. As -Built Resolution & Assessment Roll for
Paving and Drainage Improvements to Airport
Drive Adjacent to Collier Club in Sebastian,
Fla. in Roseland Gardens Subdivision
(memorandum dated March 29, 1999) 250-258
4. St. Johns River Water Management District
Cost -Share Agreements for Roseland and
Gifford Stormwater Improvements
(memorandum dated March 23, 1999)
H. Utilities
1. Final Pay Request for I.R.C. Bid No. 9019
Removal of Diesel Fuel Storage Tanks
(memorandum dated March 18, 1999)
2. Chlorination System Improvements, Final
Phase
(memorandum dated March 18, 1999)
I. Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
259-268
269-273
274-291
0 10
BACKUP
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS PAGES
A. Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Report on Lost Tree Village Islands
(no backup provided)
B. Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
C. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Letter to Mr. George Percy, State Preservation
Officer, re: LAMAC Workshop 292
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes - meeting of 3/23/99
2. Requests for Proposals (RFP 9040)
Closed Landfill Investigations
(memorandum dated March 29, 1999) 293-294
3. Residential Recycling Collection Services
(memorandum dated March 24,1999) 295-298
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meetin .
Meeting maybe broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
BOOK iu, f',i,UE 1"
0
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
APRIL 6,1999
1. CALL TO ORDER .............................................. .1-
2. INVOCATION ................................................. .1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... .1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................. .1-
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ........................ .2-
5.A. Presentation of Appreciation to the Board by Amanda McGee of Children's
Home Society ............................................. 2-
5.B. Proclamation Designating April, 1999 as "Keep America Beautiful Month"
and Designating April 17, 1999 as "Florida Clean -Up Day" in Indian River
County.................................................. .2-
6.A., B. and C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ............................ .4-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... .4-
7.A. Reports ................................................. .4-
7.B. List of Warrants ........................................... .4-
7.C. List of Warrants .......................................... .11-
7.D. Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Cost -Share Agreement Extension for
Round Island South LAAC Site - Addendum 4 .................. .18-
7.E. Kennedy Groves, Inc. - Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase I Planned
Development ............................................ .19-
7.F. Resolution 99-028 Supporting Federal Acquisition of Lier Groves, Earing
Point Groves, and Pryor Properties on North Jungle Trail as a Buffer to the
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge ....................... .20 -
APRIL 6,1999
-1-
•
BOOK 103 F d b`1
600K 103 FAGUE SAG
7.G. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Pelican Pointe, Phase II
Planned Development ..........
Creative Choice Homes, Ltd. - Request for Extension on Conceptual Site
Plan Approval to 2/26/2000 - Woods of Vero Beach .............. .25-
7.I. First Baptist Church of Winter Beach - Request for Extension of
Conceptual Site Plan Approval for a Place of Worship to 4/14/2000 .. -26-
7.7. City of Vero Beach - Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval for an
Electrical Substation to 4/21/2000 ............................ .28-
7.K. Bid #9050 - Laser Shaft Alignment Tool - Utilities - Alignment Supplies,
Inc. ................................................... .29-
7.L.
Re -Award of 4 Type III Ambulances for Emergency Services Ambulance
Division - Piggyback Indian River Shores Bid - Wheeled Coach, Inc..
-30-
7.M.
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012 ........................
.31-
7.N.
Children's Services Network - Annual Report From 10/01/97 through
09/30/98 ...............................................
.33-
7.0.
Payment to Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) -
Administrative Fees Owed for Leases from Board of Trustees, Internal
Improvement Trust Fund ...................................
.34-
7.P.
Sheriff - Law Enforcement Trust Fund - Non -Violence in Schools Program
- Vero Beach and Sebastian High Schools ......................
.35-
7.Q.
City of Vero Beach Appointments to County Committees .........
.36-
7.R
Annual County Tax Deed Applications - 6 Parcels ...............
.38-
7.S.
Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs ...................
.39-
7.T.
Resolutions 99-029 (Lawrence - 43`d Avenue Right -of -Way); 99-030 (Virgil
Parker et ux - 4t` Street Right -of -Way); and 99-031 (Lowell Wells -
Purchase of Land) - Cancelling Taxes on Recently Acquired Property
......................................................
.40-
7.U.
Turner Builders of Vero Beach vs. Drackett (Ambersand Subdivision) -
Indian River County Third Party Defendant - Appoint Community
Development Director Bob Keating as Representative to Mediation ..
-50-
7.V.
Cypress Lakes Phase II Planned Development (Formerly Stonebridge
North) - Final Plat Approval .................................
.51-
7.W.
Airmasters Lease at Fairgrounds .............................
.53 -
APRIL 69 1999
-2-
0
9.A.1. PUBLIC BEARING - RESOLUTION 99-032 - CONFIRMING PAVING &
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 1ST STREET BETWEEN 16TH AVENUE
AND 18TH AVENUE ........................................... .54-
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 99-033 - CONFIRMING PAVING &
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 18TH AVENUE BETWEEN 1ST PLACE
AND 2ND STREET ............................................. .59-
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - WESTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP. - BH
FLORIDA LAND JOINT VENTURE - CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN AND
SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR 176 -UNIT PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWN AS BERMUDA CLUB ............. .64-
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 99-011- COUNTY INITIATED REQUEST
TO REZONE ±37 ACRES FROM RS -1 TO CON-1(FLINN TRACT) AND TO
REZONE A SEPARATE ±15.8 ACRES FROM RS -1 TO CON -1 (GREEN
SALTMARSH) - (LEGISLATIVE) ................................ .73-
9.A.5. PUBLIC BEARING - ORDINANCE 99-012 - JOHN W. MITCHELL AND
OTHERS - REZONE APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRES FROM CH TO CL (QUASI-
JUDICIAL).................................................. .80-
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - DOWNDRIFT COALITION (BOB BRUCE
AND BILL GLYNN) - ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT, SECTION TEN
ACTION AGAINST THE SEBASTIAN INLET TAX DISTRICT AND THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ..... .86-
11.A.1. LDR AMENDMENTS - APPROVAL OF DATES FOR 2 BOARD
HEARINGS ............................................. .88-
11.A.2. POT BELLIED PIGS - CONSIDERATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT
BOARD ACTION (CAUSEY AND LEWIS) ......................... .90 -
APRIL 69 1999
•
-3- BOOK 103 FACE 80.7
600K i0a FACE i., s
11.C. PURCHASING POLICY ........................................ .94-
11.G.1. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 58TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS -
OSLO ROAD TO 26m STREET - PARCEL NO. 117, ABRAHAM &
CHARLOTTE BARI ETT ...................................... .95-
11.G.2. CITY OF VERO BEACH/INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ........ .96-
11.G.3. RESOLUTION 99-034 - AS -BUILT RESOLUTION AND ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO AIRPORT DRIVE
ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN (ROSELAND GARDENS
SUBDIVISION) ............................................... .97-
11.G.4. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COST -SHARE
AGREEMENTS FOR ROSELAND AND GIFFORD STORMWATER
IMPROVEMENTS ............................................ .106-
11.H.1. BID #9019 - REMOVAL OF DIESEL FUEL STORAGE TANKS - FINAL
PAY REQUEST - FRED RICE & ASSOCIATES, INC. - SEA OAKS AND
SOUTH REGIONAL WWTP................................... .107-
11.H.2. CHLORINATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - FINAL PHASE -
GLACE & RADCLIFFE - CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE .............. .108-
13.A. CHAIRMAN KENNETH R. MACHT - REPORT ON LOST TREE VILLAGE
ISLANDS................................................... .110-
13.C. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE D. GINN - COMMENTS REGARDING BEACH
SURVEY................................................... .110-
13.D. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE - LETTER TO GEORGE PERCY,
STATE PRESERVATION OFFICER, BUREAU OF HISTORIC
PRESERVATION - LAMAC WORKSHOP REGARDING JOINT TITLE . -111-
APRIL 6, 1999
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ........................... .112 -
APRIL 69 1999
-5-
EDOK 103 FAGS 8 09
•
April 6, 1999
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMNIISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, April 6, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Kenneth R Macht, Chairman; Fran B.
Adams, Vice Chairman•, John W. Tippin; Caroline D. Ginn; and Ruth Stanbridge. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County
Attorney; and Patricia "PT' Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Macht called the meeting to order and wished everyone a Happy Easter.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Ginn delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
County Attorney Vitunac led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that Item 9.B., Downdrift Coalition (Bob Brace and
Bill Glynn) - Endangered Species Act, Section Ten. Action against the Sebastian Inlet Tax
District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection be added to the Agenda.
Commissioner Ginnrequested the addition ofItem D.C., Comments regarding Beach
Survey.
APRIL 611999
-1-
•
&oOK 103 F�cF 310
BOOK D F40E
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Grin, the Board
unanimously added the above items to the Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
S.A. PRESENTATION OFAPPRECIATION TO THE BOARD BYAM, ANDA MCGEE
OF CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY
StaceyMalinowski ofthe Children's Home Societypresented abeaufful crystalbowl
to the Board for their support of the Children's Home. She announced that there are now 12
sexually and physically abused girls living at the Home who are being taught independent
living. She thanked the community for the enormous outpouring of support and donations
and noted that she had never seen a county come together for a cause like this one has.
S.B. PROCLAMATIONDESIGNATINGAPRIL.1999AS "IfEEPAMERICA
BEAUTIFUL MONTH"AND DESIGNA TMG APRE 17 1999 AS "FLORIDA
CLEAN-UPDAY"ININDLwRwER COUNTY
Chairman Macht presented the following Proclamation to Pat Harris of Keep Indian
River Beautiful:
APRIL 69 1999
PROCLAM--ATION
DESIGNATING APRIL, 1999 AS
KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL M=TR
AIM DESIGNATING APRIL 17, 1999
AS FLORIDA CLEAN-UP DAY IN
nwXM RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, Indian River County is rich in beauty and natural resources; and
WHEREAS, every citizen should contribute to the preservation of this beauty
and the protection of these natural resource; and
WHEREAS, Keep America Beautiful Month annually involves millions of
Americans in actions to improve the nation's communities through litter
prevention and beautification; and
WHEREAS, Keep Indian River Beautiful is a local affiliate of Keep America
Beautiful, Inc. and will initiate environmental, community -enhancement and
educational programs in April:
APRIL 69 1999
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS that the month of April, 1999 be designated as
KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL MDNTN
in Indian River County, and designating April 17, 1999 as
FLORIDA CLEAN-UP DAY
and the Board urges all residents, businesses, community and youth groups,
governmental agencies and other organizations to recognize the programs being
offered, and work together to preserve the natural beauty of our community, not
only in April, but throughout the entire year.
Dated this 6 day of April, 1999.
BOARD OF Comm COMMISSIONERS
ISDIAN RIVER C=Wr, FLCR=JL
nneth R. Macht, Chairman
Pat Harris of Keep Indian River Beautiful appreciated the backing of the County
Commissioners.
Richard Conde, Treasure Coast Refuse, announced the April 171 clean-up and noted
that this is an opportunity for the citizens to show their pride in their communities. Treasure
Coast Refuse and Harris Sanitation are issuing a challenge to the Commissioners to designate
a site and get volunteers to clean up the area; the one with the most volunteers and garbage
collected will be awarded $1200 from Treasure Coast Refuse and $1200 from Harris
Sanitation which can be donated to the charity of their choice. All materials will be supplied.
George Golepko of Hams Sanitation also challenged the press to encourage volunteer
organizations and citizens to support the effort and help make nature shine on April 17t`.
Commissioner Adams then challenged the rest of the Commissioners and offered a
prize for the winning Commissioner of a home -cooked frog leg dinner. She stated that the _
only reason she won last year is that she was the only participating Commissioner.
APRIL 69 1999
-3- POCK RGE
FF- -7
600K 103 PAGE 0.3'
6.A., B. and C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meetings of March 2,1999; March 9,1999; and March 16, 1999. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meetings of March 2, 1999; March 9, 1999; and
March 16, 1999, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Ginn requested that Item 7.Q. be separated from the Consent Agenda
for discussion.
7.A. REPORTS
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board:
1. Sebastian Inlet Tax District (1) Annual Financial Report for FY 1997-98; (2)
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Year Ended 9/30/98; and (3)
Proposed Meeting Schedule for FY 1998-99.
7.B. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 18, 1999:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 19, 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for
the time period of March 11 to March 18, 1999.
APRIL 69 1999
•
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as
issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period from
March 11, 1999 through March 18, 1999, as
recommended by staff.
CHECK
NUMBER
NAME
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
0019873
TRANS GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE
1999-03-11
3,842.10
0019874
IRC MaMMYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-03-11
6,500.00
0019875
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
1999-03-11
2,098.02
0019876
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
1999-03-11
1,640.31
0019877
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
1999-03-11
394.20
0019878
IRC EMPLOYZE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-03-11
6,615.47
0019879
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA)
1999-03-11
1,724.84
0019880
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
1999-03-17
138.50
0019881
BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-03-17
694.79
0019882
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-03-17
135.20
0019883
ST LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-03-17
724.98
0019884
RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-03-17
150.00
0019885
VELASQUEZ, MERIDA
1999-03-17
200.00
0019886
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF
1999-03-17
5,343.48
0019887
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
1999-03-17
143.94
0019888
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1999-03-17
300.00
0019889
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
1999-03-17
1,992.00
0019890
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
1999-03-17
83,607.66
0019891
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
1999-03-17
257.69
0019892
NACO/SOUTHEAST
1999-03-17
5,589.93
0019893
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
1999-03-17
596.21
0019894
OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REL
1999-03-17
167.25
0019895
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
1999-03-17
23.08
0019896
POWELL, MARY A.
1999-03-17
270.18
0259029
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
1999-03-18
716.34
0259030
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
1999-03-18
32.95
0259031
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
1999-03-18
35.90
0259032
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
1999-03-18
482.54
0259033
APPLE I+Il4CHINE & SUPPLY CO
1999-03-18
128.82
0259034
AT YOUR SERVICE
1999-03-18
1,911.20
0259035
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
1999-03-18
4.00
0259036
AUTO SUPPLY CD OF VERO BEACH,
1999-03-18
549.01
0259037
ABS PUMPS, INC
1999-03-18
335.84
0259038
AQUAGENIX LAND -WATER
1999-03-18
191.00
0259039
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
1999-03-18
59.90
0259040
COMMONWEALTH TECH
1999-03-18
250.00
0259041
ABARE, EDWARD J III
1999-03-18
8.70
0259042
AMERICAN AIR FILTER
1999-03-18
1,350.24
0259043
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
1999-03-18
47.92
0259044
A T & T
1999-03-18
13.34
0259045
AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE
1999-03-18
60.00
0259046
ASHBROOK CORP
1999-03-18
2,989.32
0259047
ALBERTSON'S
1999-03-18
1,400.00
0259048
ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC
1999-03-18
170.56
0259049
ALL COUNTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
1999-03-18
24.98
0259050
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
1999-03-18
1,369.25
0259051
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1999-03-18
5,735.72
0259052
ARCH PAGING
1999-03-18
1,239.40
0259053
ABOO GARAGE DOOR CO
1999-03-18
3,640.00
0259054
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
1999-03-18
58.00
0259055
A A R P
1999-03-18
24.85
0259056
ALBZRTSON'S
1999-03-18
63.57
0259057
AUSSIE SHADE =
1999-03-18
140.00
0259058
S & H INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
1999-03-18
865.67
0259059
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
1999-03-18
46.39
0259060
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSiONERB
1999-03-18
6,777.06
0259061
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
1999-03-18
112.68
0259062
BLACKBAWK QUARRY COMPANY
1999-03-18
167.13
0259063
BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PED
1999-03-18
500.00
APRIL 69 1999
-5-�p
BOOK 3'FACUF 3
"
�r
BOOK 103 FAGS 815
CHECK NAME CHECK
0259064
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1999-03-18
5,787.75
0259065
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1999-03-18
480.14
0259066
BRAD SKITS ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-03-18
3,957.37
0259067
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
1999-03-18
60.10
0259068
BRODART CO
1999-03-18
3,499.82
0259069
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
1999-03-18
632.50
0259070
B & J LOCKSMITH, INC
1999-03-18
54.00
_ 0259071
BROWN, DONALD JR --
1999-03-18
497.00
0259072
BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
1999-03-18
27.55
0259073
BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS
1999-03-18
435.74
0259074
BLOOMINGBURG, OTTO
1999-03-18
205.32
0259075
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
1999-03-18
30.00
0259076
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1999-03-18
39.08
0259077
BELLSOUTH
1999-03-18
24,015.31
0259078
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
1999-03-18
11,208.60
0259079
BEERS CONSTRUCTION
1999-03-18
312.94
0259080
BARTON, JEFFREY K
1999-03-18
3,070.23
0259081
BMG
1999-03-18
145.95
0259082
BEAM, BETTY
1999-03-18
59.22
0259083
BLACKBURN, COLE
1999-03-18
169.95
0259084
BOETEFUER, ALAN
1999-03-18
1,095.20
0259085
BOOS, ROGER
1999-03-18
500.00
0259086
BARRETT, SOREN PH D
1999-03-18
1,000.00
0259087
BELLSOUTH
1999-03-18
553.43
0259088
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
1999-03-18
2,373.00
0259089
COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO., INC
1999-03-18
1,000.00
0259090
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1999-03-18
993.40
0259091
CITRUS MOTEL.
1999-03-18
235.00
0259092
COLD AIA DISTRIBUTORS
1999-03-18
55.44
0259093
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
1999-03-18
289.37
0259094
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
1999-03-18
325.50
0259095
COUNCIL OF CaMMUlU= SERVICE
1999-03-18
15.00
0259096
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
1999-03-18
5,051.81
0259097
COPELAND, LINDA
1999-03-18
430.50
0259098
CONTRACT SERVICE
1999-03-18
19.75
0259099
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
1999-03-18
182.59
0259100
CABOT LODGE
1999-03-18
132.00
0259101
CLEANNET USA
1999-03-18
20,537.72
0259102
COPELAND, JAMES E JR, N D
1999-03-18
63.00
0259103
CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP
1999-03-18
864.75
0259104
CLIFFORD, MIKE
1999-03-18
100.00
0259105
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
1999-03-18
39.37
0259106
CAMPBELL, STEPHANIE
1999-03-18
133.90
0259107
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1999-03-18
292.50
0259108
COPYCO, INC
1999-03-18
64.60
0259109
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
1999-03-18
27,198.38
0259110
COSNER MFG CO
1999-03-18
546.22
0259111
CONSTRUCTION LICENSING
1999-03-18
40.00
0259112
Comm, STEFANIE
1999-03-18
157.07
0259113
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
1999-03-16
285.39
0259114
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
1999-03-18
113.96
0259115
DELTA SUPPLY CO
1999-03-18
376.87
0259116
DEMCO INC
1999-03-18
1,424.63
0259117
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
1999-03-18
204.83
0259118
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1999-03-18
526,396.22
0259119
DORY - SEACOAST SUPPLY
1999-03-18
66.73
0259120
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
1999-03-18
1,057.88
0259121
DON SKITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
1999-03-18
265.24
0259122
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
1999-03-18
16.20
0259123
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1999-03-18
456.96
0259124
FEDEB
1999-03-18
38.75
0259125
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
1999-03-18
63.30
0259126
DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC
1999-03-18
39.31
0259127
DILLARD, CASSIS
1999-03-18
16.73
0259128
DOUBLE TREE HOTEL
1999-03-18
327.00
0259129
DONLEY, BILLY JOE
1999-03-18
20.60
0259130
DANIEL, CATHY
1999-03-18
21.35
0259131
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
1999-03-18
12.50
0259132
ELLIS R PHELPS AND CO, INC
1999-03-18
263.55
0259133
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
1999-03-18
87.00
0259134
ELPEB, INC
1999-03-18
3,182.57
0259135
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
1999-03-18
16,807.65
0259136
ENVIROLIGHT, INC.
1999-03-18
1,521.63
0259137
FIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
1999-03-18
5.95
0259138
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
1999-03-18
162.90
0259139
FLORIDA COURT REPORTERS
1999-03-18
401.85
0259140
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1999-03-18
10,205.32
0259141
FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC
1999-03-18
5,814.00
0259142
FLETCmR'S APPLIANCE AND
1999-03-18
668.00
0259143
FLEET RESERVE ASSOCIATION
1999-03-18
20.00
0259144
FLOWERS BARING COMPANY OF
1999-03-18
70.10
0259145
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
1999-03-18
673.80
0259146
FLINN, SHEILA I
1999-03-18
31.50
APRIL 6, 1999
CHECK CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
0259147
FLORIDA TRANSCOR, INC
1999-03-18
34.95
0259148
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
1999-03-18
104.39
0259149
FLORIDA GARDENING
1999-03-18
19.00
0259150
F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
1999-03-18
66.83
0259151
FLEISHER, JANICE
1999-03-18
500.00
0259152
FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
1999-03-18
1,212.00
0259153
FLORIDA COUNTIES FOUNDATION
1999-03-18
90.00
0259154
FLORIDA RECORDS MANAGEMENT
1999-03-18
35.00
0259155
GALE GROUP, THE
1999-03-18
68.55
0259156
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
1999-03-18
2,537.64
0259157
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
1999-03-18
41.93
0259158
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1999-03-18
394.40
0259159
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
1999-03-18
114.50
0259160
GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
1999-03-18
768.55
0259161
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1999-03-18
1,440.56
0259162
GORMAN COMPANY
1999-03-18
672.00
0259163
GREENE, ROBERT B
1999-03-18
495.39
0259164
GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING
1999-03-18
155.00
0259165
GEESEMAN, CORA
1999-03-18
49.14
0259166
GREEN, MICHAEL
1999-03-18
30.00
0259167
GREEN, TEIARA
1999-03-18
64.37
0259168
GREEN, FREDDIE
1999-03-18
90.12
0259169
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1999-03-18
56.62
0259170
BARRISON COMPANY, THE
1999-03-18
83.70
0259171
HIGHSMITH, INC
1999-03-18
209.95
0259172
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO SEA CS
1999-03-18
12,960.00
0259173
BARLEY OF ORLANDO
1999-03-18
138.00
0259174
HILL MANUFACTURING
1999-03-18
275.72
0259175
HEALTHSOUTH TREASURE COAST
1999-03-18
1,432.65
0259176
HINES, GLADYS
1999-03-18
25.49
0259177
HART QUESTIONED DOCUMENT
1999-03-18
521.85
0259178
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-03-18
69,862.40
0259179
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
1999-03-18
862.38
0259180
INDIAN RIVER ACE HARDWARE
1999-03-18
45.46
0259181
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1999-03-18
200.00
0259182
INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
1999-03-18
98.49
0259183
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1999-03-18
877.66
0259184
INDUSTRIAL REFUSE SALES
1999-03-18
4,400.00
0259185
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
1999-03-18
103.11
0259186
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
1999-03-18
1,670.66
0259187
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
1999-03-18
1,351.25
0259188
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-03-18
3,255.00
0259189
INVINCIBLE ROOFING
1999-03-18
30.00
0259190
IBM CORPORATION
1999-03-18
1,437.87
0259191
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
1999-03-18
236.53
0259192
ISLANDER TURF SUPPLY INC
1999-03-18
66.00
0259193
ISCO, INC
1999-03-18
132.50
0259194
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-03-18
103,000.60
0259195
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
1999-03-18
175.00
0259196
IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UlO:ffiT
1999-03-18
85.61
0259197
JR REPORTING ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-03-18
73.00
0259198
J T SIRES
1999-03-18
184.00
0259199
JLR ANESTHESIA
1999-03-18
676.48
0259200
JOHNSON, LETISBA
1999-03-18
286.40
0259201
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
1999-03-18
1,538.00
0259202
BIRRUS ASSOCIATES L P
1999-03-18
355.00
0259203
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1999-03-18
45.54
0259204
KELLY TRACTOR CO
1999-03-18
522.49
0259205
KILPATRICK TURF EQUIPMENT INC
1999-03-18
102.36
0259206
KIRBY AUTO SUPPLY FT PIERCE
1999-03-18
114.45
0259207
KIPP, BILLY C
1999-03-18
51.50
0259208
IENNEY, JOHN, JR
1999-03-18
44.61
0259209
LOVE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1999-03-18
923.34
0259210
LANDRUM, GREGORY C PSY D
1999-03-18
900.00
0259211
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1999-03-18
2,915.86
0259212
LOPRESTI, ETTA
1999-03-18
139.44
0259213
LLOYD, JOHN RALPH
1999-03-18
39.00
0259214
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
1999-03-18
86.95
0259215
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1999-03-18
62.70
0259216
LANGSTON, BESS, BOLTON,ZNOSXO
1999-03-18
4,795.42
0259217
LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
1999-03-18
800.00
0259218
LUNA, JORGE
1999-03-18
51.50
0259219
LEISURE, GRACE
1999-03-18
10.00
0259220
LIPPE, IRVIN
1999-03-18
47.17
0259221
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES -
1999-03-18
10.00
0259222
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
1999-03-18
138.90
0259223
MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
1999-03-18
118.35
0259224
MIRES GARAGE
1999-03-18
1,048.47
0259225
MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS
1999-03-18
274.23
0259226
MRCHT, MMOTH
1999-03-18
795.05
0259227
MARTINS LAMAR UNIFORMS
1999-03-18
440.42
APRIL 69 1999
-7-
BOOK 103
r,
BOOK
CHECK
NUMBER
NAME
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
0259228
MATRX MEDICAL, INC
1999-03-18
1,095.10
0259229
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
1999-03-18
4.00
0259230
MOSBY
1999-03-18
36.44
02S9231
MORELLO, K A
1999-03-18
500.00
0259232
M & R SPORTSWEAR
1999-03-18
106.41
_ 0259233
MARC INDUSTRIES =-
1999-03-18
870.04
0259234
M E SHARPE, INC
1999-03-18
1,096.04
0259235
MOSS, ROGER
1999-03-18
82.40
0259236
MOSS, MARY
1999-03-18
59.22
0259237
MARLIN DEVELOPMENT
1999-03-18
500.00
0259238
MEDICARE PART B
1999-03-18
188.69
0259239
MCCLOUD, TONY
1999-03-18
77.00
0259240
MAXWELL, DANIEL
1999-03-18
51.50
0259241
MOBILITY SCOOTER CENTER
1999-03-18
282.00
0259242
MELTON, DARREN
1999-03-18
30.00
0259243
NEW READERS PRESS
1999-03-18
27.95
0259244
NORMAN LATHROP ENTERPRISE
1999-03-18
36.84
0259245
MIFF MACHINERY, INC
1999-03-18
748.90
0259246
NAN MCKAY & ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-03-18
60.00
0259247
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
1999-03-18
76.00
0259248
N Y S C A
1999-03-18
160.00
0259249
NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
1999-03-18
220.44
0259250
NATIVE HABITAT LANDSCAPING
1999-03-18
1,247.50
0259251
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1999-03-18
5,513.75
0259252
OSCEOLA HOME CARE SUPPLY
1999-03-18
14.95
0259253
ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTH
1999-03-18
22.40
0259254
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
1999-03-18
5,562.94
0259255
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
1999-03-18
33.49
0259256
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
1999-03-18
8,763.30
0259257
ORIENTAL TRADING CO, INC
1999-03-18
1,249.97
0259258
ORLANDO, KAREN M
1999-03-18
17.50
0259259
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
1999-03-18
35.78
0259260
PERKINS DRUG, INC
1999-03-18
369.25
0259261
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
1999-03-18
161.43
0259262
PUBLIC DEFENDER
1999-03-18
5,281.18
0259263
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
1999-03-18
2,500.00
0259264
PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
1999-03-18
436.10
0259265
PETTY CASH
1999-03-18
16.83
0259266
PHYSIO CONTROL
1999-03-18
857.92
0259267
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
1999-03-18
841.91
0259268
PALM BEACH POST
1999-03-18
299.52
0259269
PRESS JOURNAL
1999-03-18
280.50
0259270
PAX -MAIL
1999-03-18
6.35
0259271
PAGE, LIVINGSTON
1999-03-18
117.00
0259272
PRIMARY CARE OF THE TREASURE
1999-03-18
1,395.00
0259273
PACIFIC ROOFING CORP.
1999-03-18
99.00
0259274
PAGBNET OF FLORIDA
1999-03-18
205.95
0259275
PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
1999-03-18
31.99
0259276
PANGBURN, TERRI
1999-03-18
24.00
0259277
PRESS JOURNAL/STUART NEWS
1999-03-18
1,635.18
0259278
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1999-03-18
228.20
0259279
PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT
1999-03-18
187.50
0259280
PUBLIX PHARMACY
1999-03-18
28.99
0259281
POSTMASTER
1999-03-18
150.00
0259282
PARKER, DEBBIE
1999-03-18
103.00
0259283
PING, INC
1999-03-18
678.34
0259284
QUINTON PUBLICATIONS
1999-03-18
33.45
0259285
RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
1999-03-18
1,049.40
0259286
RECORDED BOORS
1999-03-18
5.95
0259287
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
1999-03-18
7.00
0259288
RELIANCE PETROLEUM CO, INC
1999-03-18
135.49
0259289
RIGER, JACOB M
1999-03-18
23.40
0259290
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
1999-03-18
141.30
0259291
RAPP, PAMELA
1999-03-18
12.00
0259292
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
1999-03-18
2,234.50
0259293
REINER, LILLIAN
1999-03-18
50.21
0259294
SCOTTY'S, INC
1999-03-18
820.25
0259295
SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE
1999-03-18
300.00
0259296
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
1999-03-18
302.15
0259297
SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO
1999-03-18
57.65
0259298
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL. THERAPY
1999-03-18
288.00
0259299
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1999-03-18
1,951.26
0259300
STALEY, LARRY
1999-03-18
140.94
0259301
SIMON & SCHUSTER
1999-03-18
453.62
0259302
SERVPRO OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-03-18
12,159.78
0259303
JA SEBAUER INC
1999-03-18
614.20
0259304
SHANDS HOSPITAL AT OF
1999-03-18
2,446.13
0259305
SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
1999-03-18
36.50
0259306
SDN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
1999-03-18
3,262.15
0259307
SELIG CHEMICAL IND
1999-03-18
124.95
0259308
SUPERIOR PRINTING
1999-03-18
46.00
0259309
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
1999-03-18
4,726.56
0259310
STEVENS PRINTING
1999-03-18
308.00
APRIL 69 1999
0
•
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
0259311
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-03-18
25.00
0259312
SHEEN SPECIALTY COMPANY
1999-03-18
12.90
0259313
SCBLITT BUILDERS, INC
1999-03-18
1,000.00
0259314
SKALA, ERIC
1999-03-18
43.77
0259315
SOU'T'HERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
1999-03-18
753.00
0259316
SMITH, HENRY
1999-03-18
57.00
0259317
SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
1999-03-18
1,339.74
0259318
SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL
1999-03-18
545.08
0259319
SMYTH SYSTEMS INC
1999-03-18
1,477.00
0259320
SEBASTIAN M93W NCY PHYSICIANS
1999-03-18
25.81
0259321
SPILLIS CANDELA & PARTNERS,INC
1999-03-18
3,657.50
0259322
SHIELDS, VANESSA
1999-03-18
18.02
0259323
SCHWEY, PAUL MATTHEW
1999-03-18
36.00
0259324
SCHERWINSKY, IOLA
1999-03-18
46.57
0259325
STEADMAN, NANCY
1999-03-18
500.00
0259326
STEWART, HALL, EVANS & HAFNER
1999-03-18
20,096.00
0259327
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
1999-03-18
19.31
0259328
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-03-18
1,149.26
0259329
TITLEIST DRAWER
1999-03-18
3,088.25
0259330
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
1999-03-18
33,401.52
0259331
TRAFFIC PARTS, INC
1999-03-18
3,022.50
0259332
TIPPIN, JOHN W
1999-03-18
28.42
0259333
TCI MEDIA SERVICES
1999-03-18
100.00
0259334
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
1999-03-18
768.00
0259335
TREASURE COAST COURT
1999-03-18
1,925.00
0259336
THERMOGAS COMPANY
1999-03-18
79.90
0259337
TYNDALL, ERIN
1999-03-18
100.00
0259338
TREASURE COAST REPEATER ASSOC
1999-03-18
1,250.00
0259339
UPSTART
1999-03-18
45.90
0259340
URISA
1999-03-18
124.00
0259341
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
1999-03-18
2,106.00
0259342
UNISYS - MEDICAID
1999-03-18
47.17
0259343
VELDE FORD, INC
1999-03-18
1,278.57
0259344
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-03-18
41,147.06
0259345
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
1999-03-18
364.99
0259346
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-03-18
100.00
0259347
VERO BEACH AMATEUR RADIO CLUB,
1999-03-18
1,250.00
0259348
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
1999-03-18
25.00
0259349
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARE
1999-03-18
20.00
0259350
VAN'S RADIATOR SALES s SERVICE
1999-03-18
999.00
0259351
VALUE TRENDS, INC
1999-03-18
1,000.00
0259352
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-03-18
25.00
0259353
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-03-18
808.85
0259354
WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608
1999-03-18
464.64
0259355
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4248
1999-03-18
30.00
0259356
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-03-18
109.64
0259357
WIGINTON FIRE SPRINRLERS,INC
1999-03-18
1,950.00
0259358
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
1999-03-18
109.72
0259359
WILLHOFF, PATSY
1999-03-18
104.00
0259360
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
1999-03-18
165.00
0259361
WILDLIFE PHARMACEUTICALS
1999-03-18
551.04
0259362
WORLD AVIATION DIRECTORY
1999-03-18
240.00
0259363
WRAP N' SHIP
1999-03-18
8.30
0259364
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1999-03-18
425,566.01
0259365
WOLFE, ERIN
1999-03-18
16.73
0259366
WILKERSON, KEMISHA
1999-03-18
10.30
0259367
WILSON, SUSAN BARNES
1999-03-18
128.75
0259368
SERO% CORPORATION
1999-03-18
278.58
0259369
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
1999-03-18
572.13
0259370
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
1999-03-18
102.57
0259371
ZATPMKM K, CHARLES J
1999-03-18
46.87
0259372
Z, KARL
1999-03-18
105.70
0259373
BLOOMIHGBURG, OTTO H
1999-03-18
177.72
0259374
BOUTHELLA, MONDBER & MARY ANN
1999-03-18
24.31
0259375
AVERY, SHARON A
1999-03-18
36.87
0259376
JOHNSON, MULIKUA
1999-03-18
37.77
0259377
MONACO, MATTHEW R
1999-03-18
23.60
0259378
BARTELME, SHAWN
1999-03-18
30.78
0259379
RIVER PARR PLACE
1999-03-18
277.26
0259380
SERGMAN. MARK
1999-03-18
87.67
0259381
HALPIN, JASON E
1999-03-18
52.43
0259382
DE 3TEPHAN, JOE
1999-03-18
35.82
0259383
ASSOCIATES REALTY
1999-03-18
93.70
0259384
REYNOLDS, JENNIFER
1999-03-18
8.75
0259385
SHROYER, RANDALL L
1999-03-18
27.03
0259386
GENT, DANA
1999-03-18
17.05
0259387
HURLEY, REBECCA -
1999-03-18
50.14
0259388
VERO PALM ESTATES
1999-03-18
48.97
0259389
GIANNOTTI, DOROTHY
1999-03-18
9.39
0259390
GPJUILICE, RUTH
1999-03-18
32.85
0259391
FISHER, BELLA & BRIAN
1999-03-18
39.43
0259392
MC WHINNEY, RODNEY O
1999-03-18
66.17
APRIL 6, 1999
�� F'r1u
BOOK
CHECK
NUMBER
man
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
0259393
PARKER, MARJORIE
1999-03-18
11.83
0259394
LYNCH, ARTHUR E
1999-03-18
81.10
0259395
FANTO, SHEILA & FRANK
1999-03-18
76.94
0259396
COBUN, ROBERT
1999-03-18
71.12
0259397
SNIPES, KATBMIA
1999-03-18
12.33
0259398
BOYLE, CAROLYN M
1999-03-18
21.53
0259399
LUCAS, PAUL & LISA
1999-03-18
50.00
0259400
MOD INVESTMENTS
1999-03-18
45.93
0259401
BARCUS, JOAN
1999-03-18
13.33
0259402
KARSON, THERESA M
1999-03-18
7.29
0259403
HOLLER, ERIC
1999-03-18
12.50
0259404
PARKER, CRYSTAL
1999-03-18
27.08
0259405
FOLSOM III, JOHN & DIANNE
1999-03-18
48.76
0259406
BR08TON, FATZSHA
1999-03-18
24.29
0259407
DELGADO, DARKEN
1999-03-18
56.38
0259408
PETRAITIS, EVELYN
1999-03-18
63.73
0259409
COTRONE, NICHOLAS A
1999-03-18
60.40
0259410
BEAM, MALLARINA
1999-03-18
24.72
0259411
COT&, RHONDA A
1999-03-18
14.52
0259412
BOREMI, GRACE
1999-03-18
15.96
0259413
JACOBS, RUTS
1999-03-18
28.75
0259414
CLARK, DR MICHAEL J
1999-03-18
29.52
0259415
SMITH, JACQUELINE D
1999-03-18
37.14
0259416
GREGG JR, DAVID
1999-03-18
85.25
0259417
HARRISON, JONELLB
1999-03-18
26.52
0259418
TOZZOLO BROTHERS CONST CO INC
1999-03-18
50.58
0259419
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
1999-03-18
42.78
0259420
ANDO BUILDERS
1999-03-18
44.12
0259421
GREER, CHRISTOPHER M
1999-03-18
40.18
0259422
DUMAS, JOYCE
1999-03-18
5.28
0259423
KELLY,S NAIL WORKS INC
1999-03-18
59.28
0259424
LUCAS, PAUL & LISA
1999-03-18
35.79
0259425
HAYHURST, WILLIAM
1999-03-18
79.04
0259426
KASZEBSKI, MICHAEL
1999-03-18
66.20
0259427
TESSITORE, VINCENT & MARY
1999-03-18
44.85
0259428
FOREST ACRES INC
1999-03-18
32.73
0259429
THOMAS, HOPE
1999-03-18
27.95
0259430
OLIVER, GWEN A
1999-03-18
1.83
0259431
FERGUSON, SHARLENE
1999-03-18
21.25
0259432
JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS INC
1999-03-18
40.82
0259433
BARKER, DOUGLAS M
1999-03-18
34.01
0259434
FERNEWALD, SHAWN
1999-03-18
37.89
0259435
CHO VERO BEACH INC
1999-03-18
224.47
0259436
MILLER, ANY
1999-03-18
9.16
0259437
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
1999-03-18
43.03
0259438
VALDEZ, LINDA D
1999-03-18
15.87
0259439
GRAND HARBOR
1999-03-18
64.47
0259440
RYBACKI, CHESTER
1999-03-18
31.46
0259441
SNYDER, R C
1999-03-18
36.31
0259442
WASNER, JOHN A
1999-03-18
38.64
0259443
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO INC
1999-03-18
69.37
0259444
HERMAN, JOZSEF
1999-03-18
5.47
0259445
GRANT, WILLIAM
1999-03-18
5.67
0259446
CHERNYSHZV, FRANCINE
1999-03-18
46.78
0259447
STEADMAN, NANCY J
1999-03-18
43.62
0259448
HANDY, FRANK G
1999-03-18
82.19
0259449
ACTS CONSTRUCTION INC
1999-03-18
340.60
0259450
BAILEY, JODI MARIE
1999-03-18
76.44
0259451
PROSSER, WANDA
1999-03-18
105.06
0259452
MC DZRMOTT, MATTHEW J
1999-03-18
52.53
APRIL 6, 1999
0
1,709,903.85
BOOK 103PAGE S
0
Z C. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 1999:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 25,1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for
the time period of March 19 to March 25, 1999.
ON MOTION by Commissioner
Adams,
SECONDED b Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Y ��
Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as
issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period from
March 19, 1999 through
March 25,
1999, as
recommended by staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
RUN=
DATE
AMOUNT
0018687
ECHEVARRIA, MCCALLA, RAMMER,
1997-08-12
.00
VOID
0019897
FLORIDA caMS LIFE
1999-03-19
2,301.47
0019898
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
1999-03-19
1,132.00
0019899
FLORIDA MINED LIFE
1999-03-19
2,236.93
0019900
JOHNSON, LETISHA D
1999-03-22
988.00
0019901
BMW FISCEER a SONS, INC
1999-03-22
31,177.47
0215431
CHERNYSHEv, FRANCINE
1996-12-31
.00
VOID
0215444
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1996-12-31
.00
VOID
0215745
RICHARDSON, MARK
1997-01-09
.00
VOID
0216111
BOWIE IV, WILLIAM T
1997-01-16
.00
VOID
0216112
KHAN, SARWAR A
1997-01-16
.00
VOID
0216162
CASH, ELIZABETH
1997-01-16
.00
VOID
0216164
BERDINB JR, DAVID W
1997-01-16
.00
VOID
0216511
TIMBER RIDGE INC
1997-01-23
.00
VOID
0217272
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1997-02-06
.00
VOID
0217330
KARSON, THERESA M
1997-02-06
.00
VOID
0217662
HARRISON, R G
1997-02-13
.00
VOID
0217678
AUSTIN, JOHN T
1997-02-13
.00
VOID
0217859
LOSS PREVENTION SPECIALISTS
1997-02-20
.00
VOID
0218028
TRIGO JR, AGUSTIN
1997-02-20
.00
VOID
0218483
H U D
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218486
J K INvE37MBHT USA INC
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218489
CONN, ALAN a SANDIE
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218511
GARCIA, Luz
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218513
HOELEE, ARTHUR N
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218515
LA CLAM, MONICA
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218516
LOWERY, JOHN
1997-02-27
.00
VOID —
0218517
DILLON, FRANK F -
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218530
G E CAPITAL MORTGAGE
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218533
BROBTON, LYDIA
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218535
SPECTRUM
1997-02-27
.00
VOID
0218819
FINN-AIKINS, KOFI
1997-03-06
.00
VOID
0218821
DRITENBAS, JOHN a DIANA
1997-03-06
.00
VOID
APRIL 6, 1999
BOOK R13 PAGE 8 ;moi
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0218829
CAMERON CORPORATION
1997-03-06
.00
VOID
0218836
ST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
1997-03-06
.00
VOID
0218849
ALBRECHT PAINTING
1997-03-06
.00
VOID
0218972
FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION
1997-03-13
.00
VOID
0219227
FRANKE, KAREN L
1997-03-13
.00
VOID
0219231
MICHAEL MLEKO GENERAL CONTRACT
1997-03-13
.00
VOID
0219257
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
71997-03-13
.00
VOID
0219260
ESTATE OF ALICE M COURSEY
1997-03-13
.00
VOID
0219558
SELPH, CRYSTAL
1997-03-20
.00
VOID
0219622
DEAN, JOYCE 8
1997-03-20
.00
VOID
0220163
SACKVILLE, WALTER
1997-03-27
.00
VOID
0220505
CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC
1997-04-03
.00
VOID
0220789
TORRES, MANUEL F
1997-04-10
.00
VOID
0220833
ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES, INC
1997-04-10
.00
VOID
0220848
LORINO, BONG -SUN
1997-04-10
.00
VOID
0221254
CHAPMAN, JAMES H
1997-04-17
.00
VOID
0221661
LAW, BEULAH
1997-04-24
.00
VOID
0221838
1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA
1997-04-30
.00
VOID
0222010
STONE, JENNIFER S
1997-04-30
.00
VOID
0222020
HAM F STORMS LIVING TRUST
1997-04-30
.00
VOID
0222774
CAL BUILDERS INC
1997-05-15
.00
VOID
0222799
RIGGS, JANNELL M
1997-05-15
.00
VOID
0222800
FULMER JR, Z GLENN
1997-05-15
.00
VOID
0222801
FULLER, ELDON N
1997-05-15
.00
VOID
0222846
OLIVER, DEMISE
1997-05-15
.00
VOID
0222848
SIFF, GEORGE
1997-05-15
.00
VOID
0222883
BOWLING, C G
1997-05-22
.00
VOID
0223182
BEAUREGARD, KELLY AND CITY OF
1997-05-22
.00
VOID
0223370
CRAFTS & STUFF
1997-05-29
.00
VOID
0223412
GITELES, KRISTIN
1997-05-29
.00
VOID
0223448
LAWSON, JUDD V
1997-05-29
.00
VOID
0223575
PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION
1997-05-29
.00
VOID
0223822
SWEETING, ROBYN D
1997-06-05
.00
VOID
0223876
HINZMAN, FRANK D
1997-06-05
.00
VOID
0224005
CARPENTER, DANNY W
1997-06-12
.00
VOID
0224150
PELTIER, GILBERT
1997-06-12
.00
VOID
0224250
SCHODER, MARGARET
1997-06-12
.00
VOID
0224266
STEVENER, JOSEPH B
1997-06-12
.00
VOID
0224311
B & B OFFICE EQUIPMENT, INC
1997-06-19
.00
VOID
0224604
SHROYER, RANDALL L
1997-06-19
.00
VOID
0225084
TOZZOLO BROTHERS CONST CO INC
1997-06-26
.00
VOID
0225102
MILLER, AMY
1997-06-26
.00
VOID
0225138
CLUE, LASCELLES
1997-06-26
.00
VOID
0225146
BAKER, KAREN P
1997-06-26
.00
VOID
0225763
ANTONIO DOS SANTOS ARAUJO
1997-07-17
.00
VOID
0225903
KELLY, KENNETH F
1997-07-17
.00
VOID
0226068
GROSKLOSS, MARY
1997-07-17
.00
VOID
0226078
MANUFACTURED HOME COMM/REPOS
1997-07-17
.00
VOID
0226101
BARNES, TRIM
1997-07-17
.00
VOID
0226454
LANG, CHARLES A
1997-07-24
•00
VOID
0226464
BLAKE, FRANK L
1997-07-24
.00
VOID
0226474
KALIN, MITCHELL A
1997-07-24
.00
VOID
0226488
DE LANGE, DEBORA
1997-07-24
.00
VOID
0226493
KNAPP, JAMES W
1997-07-24
.00
VOID
0226494
DI PASQUALE, RALPH J
1997-07-24
.00
VOID
0226505
BARTON UNDERGROUND CONST INC
1997-07-24
.00
VOID
0226618
ELWELL, JACQUELINE & F P & L
1997-07-25
.00
VOID
0227035
KIRSTEIN, JAMIE
1997-07-31
.00
VOID
0227163
NOLEN, VICKIE L
1997-08-07
.00
VOID
0227358
MARSHAL, MONA
1997-08-07
.00
VOID
0227363
AUSTIN, JOHN T
1997-08-07
.00
VOID
0227619
CORNERSTONE SELECT 3=5 INC
1997-08-14
.00
VOID
0227752
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1997-08-21
.00
VOID
0227933
TRIGO JR, AGUSTIN
1997-08-21
.00
VOID
0227935
PERRY, LILLIAN M
1997-08-21
.00
VOID
0227980
SHEA, SETH
1997-08-21
.00
VOID
0227996
PREY JR, HARLAND
1997-08-21
.00
VOID
0228389
SEGUINE, JAMES
1997-08-28
.00
VOID
0228470
BRANDT, DALE & DEBORAH
1997-08-28
.00
VOID
0229275
PEVA, ROSELL
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229332
VERO BEARING & BOLT
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229354
KUNTZ, KERRIE
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229370
FROECHTE, LISA K
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229387
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229392
HUTCHESON, PAT
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229397
FOJTIK, BRAD
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229401
COSTANZO, RICHARD A
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229428
BALL, BRIGITTE & FRANKLIN
1997-09-18
.00
VOID
0229564
G E TRAVEL CENTER
1997-09-25
.00
VOID
0229755
HINZMAN, FRANK D
1997-09-25
.00
VOID
0229758
OLIVER III, S L
1997-09-25
.00
VOID
0229770
WELCKER, JASON
1997-09-25
.00
VOID
APRIL 69 1999
0
CHECK
CHECK NAME
DDATBE
AMOUNT
NUNBER
0229906 SPIRES, TISA AND CITY OF VERO
1997-10-01
1997-10-02
.00 VOID
,00 VOID
0230016 DAVIS' WESLEY
1997-10-16
.00 VOID
0230938 D ALBORA III, JOHN V
1997_10-16
.00 VOID
0230957 STRICLQ,AND, M KAT28
1997-10-16
.00 VOID
0230960 MUNNINGS, WANDA
1997-10-23
.00 VOID
0231305 FAIRCHILD, JOHN
COURT LIMITED PRTNS
_10-23
.00 VOID
VOID
0231306 PEMBROKE
1997-10-23
.00
0231320 CAL BUILDERS, INC
& ANITA
1997-10-23
.00 VOID
0231337 CLENDENING, CHARLES
1997-10-23
.00 VOID
0231344 PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION
1997-10-23.00
VOID
0231354 DALEY, MARISSA & SHAWN
1997-10-24
.00 VOID
0231523 WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M
1997-11-06
.00 VOID
0231933 BAXTER, RONALD
1997-11-13
.00 VOID
0232838 SCHLITT, LARRY
CATHY L CLARK
1997-11-13
.00 VOID
VOID
0232842 HOLLOWAY,
1997-12-04
.00
0233769 JOHN, ERIC
1997-12-04
.00 VOID
0233778 BEATING, ROBERT M
1997-12-04
.00 VOID
0233780 CAMP, EDGAR
1997-12-04
.00 VOID
0233781 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1997-12-04
.00 VOID
0233794 MG8 CONSTRUCTION INC
ROSEMAN JOINT VENTUR
1997-12-04
.00 VOID
VOID
0233807 DUCK POND
1997-12-04
.00
0233822 LARGE, ANDREW
1997-12-11
.00 VOID
0234177 ANDERSON, SCOTT G
1997-12-18
.00 VOID
0234258 ALLSTATE
1997-12_18
.00 VOID
0234583 GHO VERO BEACH INC
1997_12_18
.00 VOID
0234593 STEVENER, JOSEPH 8
1997-12-18
.00 VOID
0234601 AVERY, JANE L
1997_12_18
.00 VOID
0234603 PRATER, LORETTA
0234607 FANTO, SHEILA & FRANK LTD
1997-12-18
1997-12-18
.00 VOID
.00 VOID
0234631 CED CONSTRUCTION PARTNERS
1997-12-19
.00 VOID
0234702 LAW, BEULAS
FOODS II CORPORATION
1997-12-31
.00 VOID
VOID
0234828 BAF
0238770 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1998-03-12
1999-02-11
.00
.00 VOID
0256969 BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
1999-02-25
.00 VOID
0258003 JONES, GLENN B' DC
INC
1999_03-04
.00 VOID
0258170 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO'
1999-03-04
.00 VOID
0258418 SAWYER, RUTH
1999-03-11
.00 VOID
0258948 RIVERS, OTTO
0259028 FIRST AMERICAN BANG
1999-03-11
1999-03-18
.00 VOID
.00 VOID
0259352 WL -MART STORES' INC
1999-03-25
23.00
0259453 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT' INC
1999_03-25
42.00
0259454 ACE PLUMBING, INC
1999-03-25
172.80
0259455 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
1999-03-25
398.85
0259456 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
1999-03-25
26.77
0259457 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
1999-03-25
191.88
0259458 APPLE
0259459 APPLE MACEINE & SUPPLY CO
1999-03-25
197.54
1,286.45
0259460 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH'
1999-03-25
1999-03-25
88.95
0259461 A M BEST COMPANY
1999-03-25
77.25
0259462 ATLANTIC REPORTING
1999_03-25
10,625.57
0259463 ABS PUMPS, INC
INNCNIMG
1999-03-25
225.00
0259464 ALL POWER SERVICES'
RITE WATER
1999-03-25
75.00
0259465 ALL
0259466 AMERICAN AIR FILTER
1999-03-25
1999_03-25
396.48
625.00
0259467 OLDEN ELECTRONICS, INC
1999-03-25
57.53
0259468 A T & T
0259469 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
1999_03-25
67,101.35
110.30
0259470 A T & T LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 1999-03-25
28,41
0259471 ASHWORTH INC
COASTAL TITLE CORP
1999-03-25
1999-03-25
190.00
0259472 ATLANTIC
0259473 ANTHONY BAIL BONDS
1999-03-25
1999-03-25
747.00
500.00
0259474 ACTION TRAINING SYSTEMS' INC
1999-03-25
223.41
0259475 AUTO PARTS OF VERO' INC
1999-03-25
370.04
0259476 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
1999-03-25
11,700.10
0259477 AVATAR UTILITY SERVICES' INC
1999-03-25
54.25
0259478 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1999-03-25
1,311.18
0259479 APPERSON CHEMICALS'INC
1999-03-25
80.20
0259480 AMETEK ROTRON
R S CLIMATIC CORPORATION
1999-03-25
2,222.00
0259481 A
1999-03-25
146.50
0259482 ANICOM
1999-0325
500.00
0259483 AMERITREND EMS
1999-0325
16,100.10
0259484 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND
1999_0.3-25
143.55
0259485 ANGOR CORP INC-
1999-03-25
7,310.16
0259486 ASSOCIATES LEASING, INC'
1999-03-25
175.00
0259487 AQUATIC WEED CONTROL IMC
1999-03-25
26.38
0259488 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO -- 1999-03-25
OF COUNTY C,OoaBSIONERS
3,674.46
0259489 BOARD
0259490 BETTER BUSINESS FORMS' INC
1999-03-25
756.60
171.44
0259491 BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY
1999-03-25
6.00
0259492 BOWLING, C G
1999-0325
1999-03-25
500.00
0259493 BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J POD
1999_03-25
3,582.00
0259494 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLENK
APRIL 69 1999
-13-
8OOK 103 FAGE,
r
0
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
BOOK i O a PAGES93
CHECK
AMOUNT
0259495
BBRGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1999-03-25
219.23
0259496
BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-03-25
486.00
0259497
BARER & TAYLOR INC
1999-03-25
1,984.18
0259498
BRODART CO
1999-03-25
7,988.85
0259499
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
,1999-03-25
271.85
0259500
B & J LOCKSMITH, INC
= 1999-03-25
1,485.00
0259501
BELLO, JUAN ESQ
1999-03-25
6,825.32
0259502
BELLO,ES9 JUAN
1999-03-25
5,052.00
0259503
BAXTER, RONALD
1999-03-25
30.00
0259504
BELLSOUTH COMM0NICATION
1999-03-25
1,929.00
0259505
BILLING SERVICES INC
1999-03-25
15.66
0259506
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
1999-03-25
728.00
0259507
BAKER & TAYLOR RINMENT
1999-03-25
817.30
0259508
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1999-03-25
64.25
0259509
BELLSOUTH
1999-03-25
10,100.80
0259510
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
1999-03-25
452.90
0259511
BLACKSTONE AUDIOBOOKS
1999-03-25
151.16
0259512
BMG
1999-03-25
114.23
0259513
BPS -ORLANDO
1999-03-25
21,000.00
0259514
BLACKBURN, COLE
1999-03-25
64.37
0259515
SEIDLER, HENRY
1999-03-25
177.48
0259516
BUCHANNON, JAMES
1999-03-25
64.64
0259517
BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIVISION
1999-03-25
5,380.50
0259518
BELLSOUTH
1999-03-25
1,789.05
0259519
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
1999-03-25
184.39
0259520
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1999-03-25
108.57
0259521
CHLORINATORS, INC
1999-03-25
85.57
0259522
CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC
1999-03-25
1,068.00
0259523
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
1999-03-25
19.00
0259524
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
1999-03-25
232.93
0259525
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
1999-03-25
12,192.02
0259526
COMIIMUNICATIONS INT, INC
1999-03-25
3,417.00
0259527
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
1999-03-25
311.50
0259528
CLINIC PHARMACY
1999-03-25
12.92
0259529
COPELAND, LINDA
1999-03-25
234.50
0259530
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
1999-03-25
44.64
0259531
CLIFF BERRY ENV WManjTAL
1999-03-25
260.00
0259532
COOGAN, MAUREEN
1999-03-25
387.28
0259533
CRITIC'S CHOICE VIDEO
1999-03-25
9.69
0259534
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
1999-03-25
52.00
0259535
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
1999-03-25
183.38
0259536
CUSTOM PUBLISHING SERVICES INC
1999-03-25
168.00
0259537
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1999-03-25
178.50
0259538
COLUMBIA HOUSE
1999-03-25
76.78
0259539
COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO INC
1999-03-25
29.27
0259540
COSNER MFG CO
1999-03-25
52.67
0259541
CONVAULT FLORIDA, INC.
1999-03-25
6,791.65
0259542
CRESCENT RESEARCH SERVICE, INC
1999-03-25
2,000.00
0259543
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
1999-03-25
739.70
0259544
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING PRESS
1999-03-25
147.64
0259545
COBS, SCOTT
1999-03-25
500.00
0259546
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
1999-03-25
320.00
0259547
RAVES SPORTING GOODS
1999-03-25
433.99
0259548
DEEP SIX DIVE SHOP, INC
1999-03-25
68.80
0259549
DELTA SUPPLY CO
1999-03-25
230.17
0259550
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1999-03-25
1,299.38
0259551
DICKEY SCALES, INC
1999-03-25
720.00
0259552
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
1999-03-25
25.00
0259553
DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
1999-03-25
460.85
0259554
DEALERS COST CORPORATION
1999-03-25
27.00
0259555
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
1999-03-25
119.47
0259556
DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
1999-03-25
891.99
0259557
DEALER'S CHOICE BOOKS, INC
1999-03-25
62.50
0259558
DESIGNED TRAFFIC
1999-03-25
23,946.00
0259559
DILLON, EDWARD D
1999-03-25
300.00
0259560
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
1999-03-25
70.50
0259561
ESQUIRE REPORTING INC
1999-03-25
530.00
0259562
ESSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
1999-03-25
115.91
0259563
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
1999-03-25
49.00
0259564
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
1999-03-25
606.09
0259565
ELPEX, INC
1999-03-25
1,360.41
0259566
E D DESIGNER HATS
1999-03-25
114.00
0259567
EMERGENCY LINEN SUPPLY CO
1999-03-25
1,121.50
0259568
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL
1999-03-25
7,600.00
0259569
ECKERD DRUG CO
1999-03-25
22.07
0259570
EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
1999-03-25
4,941.98
0259571
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES
1999-03-25
48.00
0259572
ESTES GROVES, INC.
1999-03-25
40.00
0259573
FEDEX
1999-03-25
141.75
0259574
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY
1999-03-25
350.00
0259575
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
1999-03-25
75.87
APRIL 69 1999
-14-
0
C,
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0259576 FLORIDA BAR, THE
1999-03-25
76.00
0259577 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1999-03-25
29,728.93
0259578 FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION
1999-03-25
15.00
0259579 FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
1999-03-25
1,110.00
0259580 FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICATIONS
1999-03-25
500.00
0259581 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
1999-03-25
84.38
0259582 FRANKLIN PRODUCTS CORP
1999-03-25
114.10
0259583 FLINN, SHEILA I
1999-03-25
290.50
0259584 FREDERICK, STEVEN
1999-03-25
30.00
0259585 FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
1999-03-25
164.59
0259586 FELLMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-03-25
75.00
0259587 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
1999-03-25
859.68
0259588 FLORIDA DEPT OF LABOR &
1999-03-25
21,922.35
0259589 FLORIDA HOSPITAL
1999-03-25
5,656.91
0259590 FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
1999-03-25
25.00
0259591 GALE GROUP, THE
1999-03-25
144.22
0259592 GOODKHIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-03-25
2,148.29
0259593 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1999-03-25
1,550.20
0259594 GALLS INC
1999-03-25
129.97
0259595 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1999-03-25
406.18
0259596 GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING
1999-03-25
100.00
0259597 GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER
1999-03-25
4,593.27
0259598 GRILL REFILL, INC
1999-03-25
76.00
0259599 GOLLNICK, PEGGY
1999-03-25
612.50
0259600 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
1999-03-25
616.35
0259601 HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1999-03-25
48,449.30
0259602 HORIZON NURSERY
1999-03-25
932.00
0259603 HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES
1999-03-25
2,000.00
0259604 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1999-03-25
500.00
0259605 HASENAOER, KRIS
1999-03-25
18.00
0259606 HOWARD JOHNSON zxpRESS INN
1999-03-25
136.00
0259607 HARBOR BRANCH Eny atoNMENTAL
1999-03-25
400.00
0259608 HUBBS, DONALD R
1999-03-25
165.00
0259609 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
1999-03-25
21,380.00
0259610 INDIAN RIVER BAT'T'ERY, INC
1999-03-25
83.50
0259611 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
1999-03-25
443.67
0259612 IRC COUNCIL OF cK mw=TY SER
1999-03-25
7.50
0259613 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-03-25
1,400.00
0259614 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1999-03-25
107.21
0259615 INDUSTRIAL REFUSE SALES
1999-03-25
8,250.00
0259616 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
1999-03-25
307.64
0259617 ISIS PUBLISHING
1999-03-25
74.25
0259618 INDIAN RIVER PATHOLOGY
1999-03-25
49.00
0259619 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
1999-03-25
72,125.00
0259620 INDIAN RIVER SHORES POLICE
1999-03-25
25.00
0259621 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
1999-03-25
275.00
0259622 INDIAN RIVER INDUSTRIAL
1999-03-25
556,911.53
0259623 INFO USA MARKETING INC
1999-03-25
814.00
0259624 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
1999-03-25
32.14
0259625 JACKSON ELECTRONICS
1999-03-25
12.99
0259626 JUDGE, JAMES A II
1999-03-25
29.20
0259627 KEATING, ROBERT M
1999-03-25
78.08
0259628 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-03-25
8,984.92
0259629 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1999-03-25
355.72
0259630 KEY, PATRICIA W
1999-03-25
210.00
0259631 KLINK, RICHARD
1999-03-25
1,034.00
0259632 REMP, HAROLD
1999-03-25
308.92
0259633 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
1999-03-25
1,483.29
0259634 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
1999-03-25
14.49
0259635 KIMBO EDUCATIONAL
1999-03-25
40.60
0259636 KOCOLOSKI, BLAINE L
1999-03-25
88.00
0259637 LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
1999-03-25
6,000.00
0259638 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1999-03-25
843.62
0259639 LANDRUM, GREGORY C PSY D
1999-03-25
675.00
0259640 LIVE OAK ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1999-03-25
23.50
0259641 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1999-03-25
752.39
0259642 LFI VERO BEACH, INC
1999-03-25
2,793.76
0259643 LESCO, INC
1999-03-25
152.11
0259644 LIBERTY MUTUAL
1999-03-25
162.00
0259645 LOW '3 CENTERS, INC
1999-03-25
15.68
0259646 LANDSCAPE CONNECTION
1999-03-25
86.25
0259647 LARGE PRINT LIBRARY DISCOUNTER
1999-03-25
55.22
0259648 LANZILLOTTI, ROBERT F, PH D
1999-03-25
200.00
0259649 MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP
1999-03-25
1,271.74
0259650 MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
1999-03-25
29.20
0259651 MIRES GARAGE
1999-03-25
500.00
0259652 MUM ORD LIBRARY BOOKS, INC"
1999-03-25
3,494.99
0259653 HEISER CONSTRUCTION
1999-03-25
500.00
0259654 MACMILLAN, DAVID MD PA
1999-03-25
350.00
APRIL 691999
-15- BOOK
0
103 [AGE 2
APRIL 69 1999
BOOK 108 PA„ &'5
CHECK
NUMBER
NAME
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
0259655
DUPONT,BARARA MARESCA
1999-03-25
27,500.00
0259656
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
1999-03-25
77.20
0259657
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
1999-03-25
70.50
0259658
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
1999-03-25
166.91
0259659
MAGNUM ENIVRONMENTAL SERVICES
1999-03-25
1,373.00
0259660
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
1999-03-25
1,021.44
0259661
MAIN STREET HARDWARE, INC
_ 1999-03-25
759.00
0259662
MARC INDUSTRIES
- 1999-03-25
925.43
0259663
MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC
1999-03-25
171.52
0259664
MAS, OGLA
1999-03-25
50.00
0259665
MULLIGAN, MAUREENE
1999-03-25
15.00
0259666
NATIONAL INFORMATION
1999-03-25
36.90
0259667
NEW READERS PRESS
1999-03-25
116.25
0259668
NOLTE, DAVID C
1999-03-25
17,555.25
0259669
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
1999-03-25
321.55
0259670
NEFF MACHINERY, INC
1999-03-25
246.15
0259671
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO
1999-03-25
47.40
0259672
NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
1999-03-25
55.61
0259673
NEELY, EMILY
1999-03-25
30.90
0259674
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1999-03-25
698.32
0259675
ORIENTAL MERCHANDISE CO
1999-03-25
503.60
0259676
OGILVIE, LIONEL H
1999-03-25
75.00
0259677
ON GUARD
1999-03-25
744.51
0259678
ORLANDO, KAREN M
1999-03-25
161.00
0259679
PHILLIPS, LINDA R
1999-03-25
301.00
0259680
PRENTICE HALL
1999-03-25
100.14
0259681
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
1999-03-25
1,000.00
0259682
PHYSIO CONTROL
1999-03-25
1,496.08
0259683
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
1999-03-25
709.70
0259684
PRESS JOURNAL
1999-03-25
63.75
0259685
POSTMASTER
1999-03-25
132.00
0259686
POST ELECTRIC
1999-03-25
71.00
0259687
PETERSEN INDUSTRIES, INC
1999-03-25
97.17
0259688
PANGBURN, TERRI
1999-03-25
24.00
0259689
PRESS JOURNAL - SUBSCRIPTION
1999-03-25
117.00
0259690
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1999-03-25
68.25
0259691
PEGASUS TRAVEL
1999-03-25
659.00
0259692
PAOMEDIX CORP
1999-03-25
328.75
0259693
PINE, RICHARD
1999-03-25
500.00
0259694
RADIO SHACK AC= RECEIVABLE
1999-03-25
371.80
0259695
ROSELAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
1999-03-25
14.00
0259696
ROYAL PALM T V & STEREO
1999-03-25
300.00
0259697
RUSSO PRINTING, INC
1999-03-25
79.97
0259698
REED ELSEVIER NEW PROVIDENCE
1999-03-25
285.00
0259699
RADKE, PETER
1999-03-25
69.94
0259700
RSR
1999-03-25
1,093.00
0259701
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
1999-03-25
6.30
0259702
ROGER SHERMAN CONTRACTOR
1999-03-25
2,050.00
0259703
RUNGE, SUZANNE
1999-03-25
29.20
0259704
ROBERTS, ANNETTE R TRUSTEE
1999-03-25
10,000.00
0259705
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
1999-03-25
381.05
0259706
SCHLITT INSURANCE SERVICES INC
1999-03-25
313.00
0259707
SCHOPP, BARBARA G
1999-03-25
157.50
0259708
SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
1999-03-25
29.33
0259709
SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
1999-03-25
58.00
0259710
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
1999-03-25
350.30
0259711
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
1999-03-25
432.42
0259712
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
1999-03-25
390.95
0259713
STIMSONITE CORPORATION
1999-03-25
13,828.00
0259714
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1999-03-25
643.28
0259715
SIMON & SCHUSTER
1999-03-25
4,482.22
0259716
SANSONE, ALBERT
1999-03-25
20.50
0259717
SAFESPACE
1999-03-25
1,250.00
0259718
JA SEXAUER INC
1999-03-25
1,048.11
0259719
SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
1999-03-25
6,340.40
0259720
SALEM PRESS, INC
1999-03-25
1,568.50
0259721
SOLINET
1999-03-25
430.61
0259722
SHELDON, JAMES
1999-03-25
40,679.96
0259723
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
1999-03-25
1,254.99
0259724
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
1999-03-25
10,225.17
0259725
SNOBERGER, RUTH ANN
1999-03-25
14.12
0259726
STEVENS PRINTING
1999-03-25
221.00
0259727
SEBASTIAN POLIO DEPARTMENT
1999-03-25
50.00
0259728
SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC
1999-03-25
132.96
0259729
SAM'S CLUB #6520
1999-03-25
45.00
0259730
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY Co
1999-03-25
300.09
0259731
SWOPE RECONSTRUCTION
1999-03-25
1,954.79
0259732
SUNET DIRECT
1999-03-25
50.85
0259733
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
1999-03-25
1,496.56
0259734
SENTIMENTAL PRODUCTIONS
1999-03-25
100.55
0259735
ST EDWARDS SCHOOL
1999-03-25
80.00
0259736
STACEYS BOOK SEARCH
1999-03-25
212.50
0259737
SHIELDS, VANESSA
1999-03-25
32.18
0259738
SCOTT'S TREE SERVICE
1999-03-25
225.00
APRIL 69 1999
•
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0259739
SAMARITAN CENTER
1999-03-25
3,358.33
0259740
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
1999-03-25
33.47
0259741
STALNUT, SHANNON L
1999-03-25
66.95
0259742
STECKEMPER, JOHN W
1999-03-25
50.00
0259743
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-03-25
14,729.44
0259744
THURMAN'S
1999-03-25
4,250.00
0259745
TITLEIST DRAWER
1999-03-25
676.72
0259746
T-SHIRT FACTORY
1999-03-25
1,631.65
0259747
TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER
1999-03-25
1,916.33
0259748
TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC
1999-03-25
4,883.31
0259749
TW COMCORP
1999-03-25
425.00
0259750
TRUGREEN CHEM<.AWN
1999-03-25
630.00
0259751
TRANSIT AIR CONDITIONING
1999-03-25
519.99
0259752
TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES
1999-03-25
1,117.36
0259753
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
1999-03-25
113.92
0259754
TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF
1999-03-25
51.70
0259755
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
1999-03-25
930.00
0259756
US TOY/CONSTRUCTIVE PLAYTHINGS
1999-03-25
93.56
0259757
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1999-03-25
41,979.89
0259758
VERO BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE
1999-03-25
42.00
0259759
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-03-25
2,663.30
0259760
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1999-03-25
210.90
0259761
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
1999-03-25
282.85
0259762
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-03-25
235.83
0259763
VERO LAKE ESTATES VOLUNTEER
1999-03-25
24.00
0259764
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-03-25
50.00
0259765
VERO BEARING & BOLT
1999-03-25
340.20
0259766
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
1999-03-25
225.00
0259767
VERO HERITAGE, INC
1999-03-25
995.20
0259768
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-03-25
193.46
0259769
WILLO PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC
1999-03-25
1,745.00
0259770
W W GRAINGER, INC
1999-03-25
1,355.02
0259771
WINN DIXIE ORLANDO
1999-03-25
407.31
0259772
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
1999-03-25
58.60
0259773
WOODS & POOLE ECONOMICS, INC
1999-03-25
199.50
0259774
WILLIAM TWEE & SONS, INC
1999-03-25
110.00
0259775
WHARTON-SMITH, INC
1999-03-25
112,601.28
0259776
WALGREENS PHARMACY
1999-03-25
229.45
0259777
WAL*MART STORE 931
1999-03-25
301.45
0259778
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
1999-03-25
422.25
0259779
WOLFS, ERIN
1999-03-25
30.90
0259780
WRIGHT, MAGGIE
1999-03-25
103.00
0259781
WOLF ROOFING & SIDING
1999-03-25
3,500.00
0259782
WATSON, JANE W
1999-03-25
1,000.02
0259783
XEROX CORPORATION
1999-03-25
176.07
0259784
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICK,INC
1999-03-25
197.56
0259785
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1999-03-25
716.02
0259786
JOHNSON, LETISHA D
1999-03-25
988.00
0259787
BLOCK & TAYLOR
1999-03-25
426.88
0259788
NEWTON DAMES
1999-03-25
40.00
0259789
SPORTSMAN LODGE
1999-03-25
2,976.12
0259790
WEARS, CHARLES A & ELIZABETH
1999-03-25
16.84
0259791
JESAITS, DONALD & BETSY
1999-03-25
97.52
0259792
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-03-25
871.70
0259793
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-03-25
20.07
0259794
CARINI, GREGORY W
1999-03-25
8.34
0259795
JOBS, DONALD G & DEBRA LEE
1999-03-25
2,070.58
0259796
CLEM, POLACKWICH & VOCELLE
1999-03-25
1,780.69
0259797
NELZ, JOSEPH H
1999-03-25
105.06
0259798
BONIN, RUDOLPH T
1999-03-25
105.06
0259799
BING, JACK B
1999-03-25
105.06
0259800
BASILE, JOHN A
1999-03-25
52.53
0259801
BERNHOLD, WALTER
1999-03-25
105.06
0259802
MC GOWAN, LINDA S
1999-03-25
73.41
0259803
JOHN ALLEN
1999-03-25
2,163.89
0259804
HATTIE LLOYD
1999-03-25
323.84
APRIL 691999
1,509,002.62
-17- ROOK FAGE 809-46
r �
BOOK 103 F'AGE ; 0
7.D. FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST (FCT� COST-SHAREAGREEMENT
EXTENSIONFOR ROUND ISLAND SOUTHLAAC SITE - ADDENDUMIV
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 31, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. Keating, /
Community Developmbnt Dfitrctor
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois,;AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: March 31, 1999
RE: Request for Board Approval of Florida Communities Trust (FCT)
Cost -Share Agreement Extension for the Round Island South LAAC Site
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute
the attached "Addendum IV to Conceptual Approval Agreement" relating to the Round Island South/
Florida Communities Trust (FCT) environmental land acquisition cost -share project.
On September 8, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved purchase of the northern six
of nine parcels in the overall project, under the 50% cost -share funding agreement with the FCT.
Closing on those parcels was recently completed The referenced Addendum extends the FCT grant
award expiration date to October 31, 1999, to allow for on-going staff negotiations to acquire the
remaining southern three parcels in the project.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to
execute the attached agreement addendum.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved Addendum IV to
Conceptual Approval Agreement with Florida
Communities Trust (FCT) and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended by
staff.
ADDENDUM IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
APRIL 6, 1999
•
ZE. KENNEDY GROVES, INC - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR OLD ORCHID
PHASE I PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIIASION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AI
Community DevelopmentDffe�/
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: March 29, 1999
SUBJECT: Kennedy Groves, Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase
I Planned Development
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
Old Orchid PD is a 39.17 acre 136 unit single-family PD approved in 2 phases. The project is
located at the northeast comer of Jungle Trail and CR 510, and is approved at a density of 3.59 units
per acre. Phase I of the Old Orchid PD consists of 39 single family lots and 8 tracts on a 15.64 acre
portion of the overall project. The tracts will be used for landscape improvements, recreation
amenities, right-of-way, and stormwater management
At its regular meeting of May 14,1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary
plat approval for the Phase I subdivision. Subsequently, a land development permit was issued, and
the developer has constructed most of the required improvements. The developer is now proposing
to bond -out for the remainder of the required improvements. The owner, Kennedy Groves, Inc.,
through its agent Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc., is now requesting final plat approval and has
submitted the following:
1. A final plat for Phase I in conformance with the approved preliminary plat for Phase I.
2. A cost estimate for the remaining required subdivision improvements.
3. Contracts for construction of the remaining required subdivision improvements; internal
sidewalks will be bonded separately.
4. A letter of credit to guarantee construction of the remaining required improvements.
At this time, most of the required subdivision improvements have been completed Generally, all
of the utilities, drainage and road construction is complete, while some of the electrical work,
landscaping, signage and final paving work needs to be completed A contract for construction of
all of the remaining required subdivision improvements, along with a letter of credit to secure the
contract, has been submitted by the applicant. Both the county engineering division and the utility
services department have approved the cost estimate and have verified that the letter of credit amount
is adequate to cover the estimated cost of the remaining required improvements. The county
attorney's office has approved the construction contract for legal form and sufficiency and has
approved the format of the letter of credit
APRIL 69 1999
-19-
•
BOOK J06 FAGS C�
BOOK 103 Pr1U-E C
All applicable requirements regarding final plat approval have been satisfied Pursuant to the
—" county's LDRs, the applicant will be required to obtain a certificate of completion after construction
of the required improvements. At that time, the applicant will warranty the utility improvements via
a Utility Services department Bill of Sale. Since no other improvements are being dedicated to the
public, no other warranties will be required.
RECOMMENDATION•
Basad on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
plat approval for Phase I of the Old Orchid Planned Development and authorize the chairman to sign
the contract for construction and accept the letter of credit
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously granted final plat approval for
Phase I of the Old Orchid Planned Development and
authorized the Chairman to sign the Contract for
Construction of Required Improvements and
Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk
Improvements and accepted the Letter of Credit, as
recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS a ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.F. RESOLUTION 99-028 SUPPORTING FEDERAL ACQUISITION oFLIER
GROVES. EARING POINT GROVES. AND PRYOR PROPERTIES oNNORTH
JUNGLE TRAIL AS A BUFFER TO THE PELICANISLAND NATIONAL
WILDLIFE REFUGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 30, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AI
Community Development
FROM: Roland M. DeBlo
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: March 30, 1999
APRIL 6, 1999
• -20-
•
RE: Request for County Resolution Supporting Federal Acquisition of Lier Groves, Earing
Point Groves, and Pryor Properties on North Jungle Trail as a Buffer to the Pelican
Island National Wildlife Refuge
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
DF.CCRiPTION AND CONDMONS
The Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge (PRMR), located on north Jungle Trail, was established by
President Theodore Roosevelt in 1903 as the first national wildlife refuge. Over the past several years,
regional staff at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and local environmental groups have campaigned
for federal funding to acquire a "buffer" along the refuge. The purpose of the buffer is to guard against
potential adverse impacts associated with future development of neighboring lands. Indian River County
has contributed to the PINWR buffer by acquiring the "Korangy Tract" and by participating in the
acquisition of the "Kennedy Buffer" through the County environmental lands program.
On January 19, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a resolution in support of the allocation
of federal Land and Water Conservation Funds by Congress for federal acquisition of Kennedy Groves
property as an additional buffer to the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge. As explained to the Board
at the January 19 Board meeting, the Conservation Fund (a nonprofit organization) is assisting the FWS to
secure additional land to add to the refuge buffer.
County staff has again been contacted by representatives of the Pelican Island Preservation Society (PIPS)
requesting that the County expand its support by adopting another resolution that would encourage federal
acquisition of lands owned by Lier Groves, Earing Point Groves, and Samuel Pryor on north Jungle Trail
to add to the refuge buffer. As such, attached is a proposed resolution for the Board's consideration.
The proposed resolution supports federal acquisition of the subject properties, and does not commit county
acquisition funding.
Federal acquisition of the subject properties would complement the PINWR Buffer project that is currently
ranked 5th on the County Land Acquisition Advisory Committee's (LAAO) acquisition list. The PINWR
buffer project has been on the LAAC acquisition list since 1995. Support of the federal acquisition proposal
would serve the County's environmental land acquisition objectives, yet require no addition expenditure of
county bond fiords.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution in support of the
allocation of federal Land and Water Conservation Funds by Congress for federal acquisition of the Lier
Groves, Earmg Point Groves, and Pryor properties on north Jungle Trail as an additional buffer to the
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously adopted Resolution 99-028
supporting federal acquisition of properties
bordering the Pelican Island National Wildlife
Refuge (tier Groves, Earing Point Groves and
Pryor).
APRIL 611999
-21- BOOK 1 Fa11J �4
BOOK 10 dti. PAGE 8 3
Resolution No. 99 - 2 8
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
SUPPORTING FEDERAL ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES
BORDERING THE PELICAN ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.
WHEREAS, the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, established by President Theodore
Roosevelt in 1903 as the first national wildlife refuge of the United States, is located in unincorporated
Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge was established as a preserve and breeding
ground for native birds, and continues to serve as a nesting area for such birds as the brown pelican, common
egret, snowy egret, reddish egret, great blue heron, little blue heron, tri -color heron, black -crowned night
heron, white ibis, double -crested cormorant, anhinga, and oystercatcher; and
WHEREAS, Florida's population growth and conversion of land for development continue to
encroach on our natural systems; and
WHEREAS, federal acquisition of properties on north Jungle Trail owned by Lier Groves, Earing
Point Groves, and Samuel Pryor, bordering the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, would provide an
important buffer to protect the Refuge from land development encroachment. and
WHEREAS, Indian River County's Land Acquisition Advisory Committee has identified the overall
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge Buffer project on its priority list of environmental land acquisitions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners hereby supports
federal acquisition of the herein referenced Lier Groves, Earing Point Groves, and Pryor properties to serve
as a buffer to the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, and urges Congress to allocate monies from the
Land and Water Conservation Fund for the purchase.
Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
THE RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Adams the motion was seconded by Commissioner S t a n h r i d n p , and upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner Kenneth R Macht
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. AdamsyA
e
Commissioner John W. Tippin
A_ y e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
A_ Y e
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Aye
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 6th day of April, 1999.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
7ie;thMado
CORIDA
t:� Chairman►
itb
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
State of Florida
County of Indian River Q—
APRIL 69 1999
•
Resolution No. 99 - 28
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly auth in the State and County
to take acknowledgments, personally appeared KENNETH R. MACHT and
Chairman and Deputy Clerk, describeP161lf�y�c �
the foregoing instrument and they respectively,
before me that ex �� a �e herem and who executed
WITNESS my hand and official seal m the County and State last aforesaid this G day of
A.D., 1999.
Notary Public
APPROVED AS TO
LEGAL UFRCMNCY;
Terrence P. O'Brien
Assistant County Attorney
w: USOMROuwuaAncwwwaVOOMk_RIM WM
APRIL 69 1999
-23-
J�rJ�r� yIJVNNNANJNJJNVJ
r #*A. AMOS L Whh
rPuhlb,StWofFWid&
'►�d�'
MY ostt1
aw 3rmoo >
�aowa+ar f. fl.t ,ymr wea.ayca>
G
•
BOOK �U FA -8,39 44
BOOK 103 FAGS �ns
7.G. FLOODPLAIN CUT AND FILL BALANCE WAIVER FOR PELICANPONTE,
PHASE HPLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 1999:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator /
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.F. C•'�,+�
Public Works Director
Chris Kafer P.E.
County Engineer
FROM: David B. Cox, P.ZQ!r--
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Pelican
Pointe, Phase n Planned Development
REFERENCE: PD -98-06-08/97070035-006
DATE: March 29, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Shalloway, Foy Rayman & Newell, Inc. on behalf of Craig Foster the developer of Pelican
Pointe Phase 11 Planned Development is requesting a waiver of the cut and fill balance
requirement of Section 930.07(2)(d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection
Ordinance. Pelican Pointe Phase II received special exception use/conceptual planned
development plan approval from the Board of County Commissioners on December 8,
1998. The project is located along the west bank of the Indian River Lagoon, east of the
US 1/Barber Street intersection in Section 21, Township 31 South, Range 39 East. The
entire site is located in special flood hazard area Zone AE with a base flood elevation of
9.0 feet N.G.V.D.. The ten year stillwater elevation is 4.7 feet. The proposed
displacement of the floodplain below 4.7 feet for which the waiver is requested is 1491.5
cubic yards as indicated in the attached letter from the applicants engineer dated March
23, 1999.
The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided in Section 930.07(2)(d)1.
of being situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the
Indian River and in staffs opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and
Flood Protection Ordinance requirements can be met without adverse impact on other
lands in the estuarine environment.
A separate request for a Land Development Permit has been received by the Public Works
Department.
Alternative No. 1
Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request.
Alternative No. 2
Deny the waiver request and require redesign to accomplish an on-site balance of cut and
fill.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
APRIL 69 1999
0
-24- •
•
0
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the cut and fill balance
waiver request for Pelican Pointe, Phase H Planned
Development, as recommended by staff.
7.H. CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES, LTD. - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION ON
CONCEPTUAL SITE PmNAPPROVAL TO 2/26/2000 - WOODS OF VERO
BEACH
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 22, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert Keating, AICP
Community Development D
.4.Q -
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planting Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP�� 0
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: March 22,1999
SUBJECT: Creative Choice Homes LTD's Request for Extension of Conceptual Site Plan
Approval [SP -MA -98404-23 / 980101331
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6,1999.
On February 26, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted conceptual site plan approval
(with conditions) to construct a 176 unit apartment complex at the southwest corner of 20'" Avenue
SW and 9`h Street SW. The current expiration date of the site plan is February 26, 1999.
Prior to that expiration date, the project applicant filed a request to extend the site plan approval
expiration date. The applicant cites financing issues as the mason for the delay in construction.
Pwsuant to site plan regulations, the extension request may now be considered by the Board of
County Commissioners.
Although the LDRs have been amended since the time of project review and approval, the members —
of the Technical Review Committee CIRC) concur that subsequent amendments as applied to the
subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or redesign of the project
conceptual plan. All TRC staffmembers have recently approved The applicant's request for site plan
extension.
APRIL 69 1999
-25-
BOOFACE 6
K 31
_I
BOOK FAGE &J15
As allowed under provisions of the LDRs, Creative Choice Homes LTD, is requesting a full one year
extension of the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the LDRs, the Board
of County Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with additional conditions the requested
site plan extension. Staff has no objections to tha Board granting the request since the previously
approved site plan substantially conforms to existing LDR requirements.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Creative Choice Homes LTD's
request for a one year extension of the conceptual site plan approval with all original site plan
approval conditions to remain in effect. The new site plan approval expiration date will be February
26, 2000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved Creative Choice
Homes LTD's request for a one-year extension of
the conceptual site plan approval with all original
site plan approval conditions to remain in effect,
with a new expiration date of February 26, 2000, as
recommended by staff.
7.I. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF WINTER BEACH - REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANAPPROVAL FOR A PLACE OF
WORSHIP TO 4/14/2000
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 22, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
bert iX Keating, AICP
Community Development
.D13
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: March 22,1999
SUBJECT: First Baptist Church of Winter Beach Request for Extension of Conceptual Site
Plan Approval for a Place of Worship
[SP -MA -984)4-25 / 980101741
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
APRIL 69 1999
0
-26-
On April 14, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners granted special exception use and
conceptual site plan approval to construct a 24,595 sq. & place of worship for the First Baptist
Church of Winter Beach. The subject site is located on the south side of 6r Street in the 5100
block. The current expiration date of the site plan is April 14, 1999.
The project applicant has filed a request to extend the site plan approval expiration date. The
applicant's uncertain plans are the reasons for the delay in construction. Pursuant to site plan
regulations, the extension request may now be considered by the Board of County Commissioners.
Although the LDRs have been amended since the time of project review and approval, the members
of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that subsequent amendments as applied to the
subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or redesign of the project.
All TRC staff members have recently approved the applicant's request for site plan extension.
As allowed under provisions of the LDRs, the First Baptist Church of Winter Beach is requesting
a full one year extension of the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the
LDRs, the Board of County Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with additional
conditions the requested site plan extension. Staff has no objections to the Board granting the
request since the previously approved site plan substantially conforms to existing LDR requirements.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the First Baptist Church of
Winter Beach's request for a one year extension of the conceptual site plan approval with all original
site plan approval conditions to remain in effect. The new site plan approval expiration date will be
April 14, 2000.
APRIL 6. 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Boardunanimously approvedFirstBaptist Church of
Winter Beach's request for a one-year extension of
the conceptual site plan approval with all original
site plan approval conditions to remain in effect
with a new site plan approval expiration date of
April 14, 2000, as recommended by staff.
-27-
600K 103 F'AGc. �_J
BOOK JOB fAGE 83
7.J. CITY OF VERO BEACH- REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL FOR ANELECTRICAL SUBSTATION TO 4/21/2000
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 22, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D13WN HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert . Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
AS.
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP:: j -O l
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: March 22, 1999
SUBJECT: City of Vero Beach's Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval for an
Electrical Substation [SP -MA -98-03-19 / 97110136]
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
On April 21, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners granted conditional special exception
approval (with conditions), which made the approval of the accompanying minor site plan effective.
Approval was given to constrict a new electrical substation for the City of Vero Beach to be located
at the southwest corner of 58"' Avenue and 26i6 Street The current expiration date of the site plan
is April 21, 1999.
The project applicant has filed a request to extend the site plan approval expiration date. Permitting
issues are the reasons for the delay in construction, according to the applicant. Pursuant to site plan
regulations, the extension request may now be considered by the Board of County Commissioners.
Although the LDRs have been amended since the time of project review and approval, the members
of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that subsequent amendments as applied to the
subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or redesign of the project
All TRC staff members have recently approved the applicant's request for site plan extension.
As allowed under provisions of the LDRs, the City of Vero Beach is requesting a full one year
extension of the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the LDRs, the Board
of County Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with additional conditions the requested
site plan extension. Staff has no objections to the Board granting the request since the previously
approved site plan and corresponding approval conditions substantially conform to existing LDR
requirements.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the City of Vero Beach's
request for a one year extension of the conditional site plan approval and administrative permit use
approval, with all original approval conditions to remain in effect The new site plan approval
expiration date will be April 21, 2000.
APRIL 69 1999
-28-
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the City of Vero
Beach's request for a one-year extension of the
conditional site plan approval and administrative
permit use approval with all original approval
conditions to remain in effect, with a new site plan
approval expiration date of April 21, 2000, as
recommended by staff.
ZK BID #9050 -LASER SHAFT ALIGNMENT TOOL - UTILITIES -ALIGNMENT
SUPPLIES, INC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 1999:
DATE: March 29,1999
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler Administrator
Tom Frame, General Services Director 4.ai) ^`'~
FROM Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Maaaget4
SUBJECT: Bid Award. IRC /19050/ Laser Shaft Alignment Tool
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
specifications Marled to:
Replies:
"No Bid" Response:
VENDOR
Align mem Supplies Inc.
Toledo, Ohio
Mr. Shims
Addison, 11
EPD Technology
Richmond, Va
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID
SOURCE OF FUNDS
March 3, 1M at 2:00 P.M.
February 17, & 24,1999
Five (5) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
One (1) Vendors
BID TOTAL
$6,170.25
$6,495.00
$8,450.00
56.170.25
Other Machinery & Eaumment
471-219-536.066.49
$7,200.00
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Allenment Suooltes Inc as the lowest most responsive and
responsible bidder meeting specifications as ser forth in the Invitation to Bid. (Sec Department Memo.)
APRIL 6. 1999
•
-29-
BOOK �U fr1G�:
L
BOOK 1FAGE.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously awarded Bid #9050 to
Alignment Supplies, Inc. in the amount of $6,170.25,
as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WI1EN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
U RE AWARD OF 4 TYPE III AMBULANCES FOR EMERGENCYSERVICES
AMBULANCE DIVISION- PIGGYBAC%INDIANRIVER SHORES BID -
WHEELED COACH, INC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29,,1999:
DATE: March 29, 1999
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Doug Wright, Emergency Services Director I
Tom Frame, General Services Director
FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manag
4f
SUBJECT: Re -Award of the four (4) Type III Ambulances for
Emergency Services Ambulance Division
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
On October 6, 1998 the Board authorized the purchase of four (4) Type III ambulances from
National Ambulance Builders in Orlando, Florida. Units were to be delivered within 60 to 90
days after receipt of a purchase order. Due to non performance and extended delivery delays as
outlined in the department's memorandum of March 18, 1999 (Exhibit A), purchase order
number 86735 was cancelled
ANALYSIS
Due to the critical need for these replacement units, staff looked into the possibility of
piggybacking an existing bid for Type III ambulances awarded within the State of Florida. The
Town of Indian River Shores formally awarded their bid for a Type III Ambulance on October
22, 1998 to Wheeled Coach Inc. of Wmter Park, Florida. (Exhibit B) This unit has a shorter
wheelbase and the patient box specifications are somewhat different but these ambulances can be
utilized by the EMS Division without any difficulty. Wheeled Coach has four units in stock at
their plant in Kansas and can make delivery within 12-14 working days from the date of their
arrival in Florida. (Exhibit C) The base purchase price for this unit off the Indian River Shores
bid is $75,781 but with modifications to the vehicle specifications and proposed trade-ins, it is
anticipated that the cost to Indian River County to be less.
REC01VA1ENDATION
Staff requests authorization to piggyback the Indian River Shores bid awarded on October 22,
1998 for the purchase of four (4) Type III ambulances from Wheeled Coach Inc. of Winter Park,
Florida at a unit cost not to exceed $75,781. Upon approval by the Board, a purchase order will
be issued.
APRIL 69 1999
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously authorizedstafftopiggybackthe
Indian River Shores bid awarded on October 22,
1998 for the purchase of 4 Type III ambulances from
Wheeled Coach, Inc. of Winter Park, at a unit cost
not to exceed $75,781, as recommended by staff.
7.M. MISCELLANEOus BUDGET AMENDMENT 012
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 31, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: March 31,1999
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 012
CONSENT AGENDA
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
K
OMB Director
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Analyst
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
1. On March 23, 1999, the Board of Commissioners approved funding for 0 of July
fireworks displays for Sebastian and Vero Beach. Funding will come from the M.S.T.U.
reserve for contingencies.
2. The Road and Bridge Division requested funding for the replacement of a
stabilizer/mixer in the FY 1998/99 budget. Funds were allocated in the amount of
$100,000 to purchase a used stabilizer/mixer. Staff has been unable to acquire a reliable
piece of equipment for this amount. Therefore, the purchase of a new stabilizer/mixer
is warranted at an additional cost of $100,000. The attached entry appropriates funding.
3. The Emergency Services District has received reimbursement for assistance provided in
fighting the 1998 Florida Wildfires in the amount of $15,682. The attached entry
appropriates these funds.
4. On March 23,1999, the Board of Commissioners approved a request for CAD monitors
at the Vero Beach Police Department. Funding will be provided by 911 Surcharge
reserve for contingencies.
5. On March 23,1999, the Board of Commissioners approved utilizing FP&L Grant funds
to make work area improvements for the Radiological Emergency Analyst. The attached
entry appropriates fimding.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget
amendment.
APRIL 69 1999
510
•
BOOK 103 FAGS 84-0
BOOK 103 FAGE 8 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget
Amendment 012 as recommended by staff.
TO: Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 012
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. B ' DATE: March 31, 1999
OMB Director
Entry
Number
Funds/DeparunerdAccount Name
Account Number
increase
Decrease
1.
EXPENSES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/
Recreation/ Special Events
004-108-572-041.11
$5,000
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/
Reserve for Contingencies
004-199-581-099.91
$0
$5,000
2.
REVENUES
TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND/ Interest
Income
111-000-361-010.00
$100,000
$0
EXPENSES
TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND/ Road and
Bridge/ Heavy Equipment
111-214-541-066.43
$100,000
$0
3.
REVENUES
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/
Reimbursements
114-000-369-040.00
$15,682
$0
EXPENSES
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Fire
Services/ Overtime
114120-522-011.14
$11,523
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Fire
Services/ Retirement Contribution
114120-522-012.12
$2,918
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Fire
Services/ Social Security
114120-522-012.11
$714
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Fire
Services/ Medicare Matching
114120-522-012.17
$167
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Fire
Services/ Worker's Compensation
114120-522-012.14
$360
$0
4.
EXPENSES
911 SURCHARGE/ Communications Center/ IDP
Equipment
120-133-519-066.47
$3,000
$0
911 SURCHARGE/ Reserve for Contingencies
120-133-581-099.91
$0
$3,000
APRIL 69 1999
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. B "
OMB Director
E-1���� : ��1�►.I� „lo.r
Entry
Number
Funds/DepartmeWAccount Name
Account Number Increase
Decrease
5.
EXPENSES
GENERAL, FUND/ Radiological Emergency
Preparedness/ Office Furniture & Equipment
001-237-525-066.41 $5,000
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Radiological Emergency
Preparedness/ Regular Salaries
001-237-525-011.12 $0
$5,000
7.N. CHILDREN'S SERVICES NETWORK - ANNUAL REPORT FROM 10/01/97
THRouGH 09/30/98
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 30, 1999:
March 30,1999
Indian River County Commissioners:
The following is the Annual Report from October 1, 1997 through September 30, 1998
for the Children's Services Network I would recommend your acceptance of the report.
Respectfully Submitted
Joyce Johnston -Carlson
APRIL 69 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Boardunan;mously accepted the Children's Services
Network Annual Report for the period from October
12 1997 through September 30, 19989 as
recommended by staff.
COPY OF REPORT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
-33- EOOK x.03 FAGE6420
BOOK
7.0. PAYMENT TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION (MEP - ADMINISTRATIVE FEES OWED FOR LEASES
FROMBOARD OF TRUSTEES, INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND
The Board reviewed a letter of March 30, 1999:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 26th Street, Vero Beach,, Florida 32960
T91OPMM: (305) 567.5000
March 30,1999
Ms. Tracy Peters
Senior Acquisition Review Agent
Bureau of Public Land Administration
Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Dear Ms. Peters:
SW=M Te phone 4241011
Enclosed Is a check from Indian River County for $6,150 for the
administrative fees for leases of land by the County from the Board of
Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund. It Is my
understanding that this brings us current for all outstanding leases
held by the County where the administrative fees apply.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the letter and payment
to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection in the amount of $6,150 for administrative
fees.
APRIL 69 1999
0
-34- •
•
1-1
7.P. SHERIFF- LAWENFORCEMENT TRUST FUND - NON-VIOLENCE IN
SCHOOLS PROGRAM- VERO BEACHAND SEBASTIAN HIGH SCHOOLS
The Board reviewed a letter of March 26, 1999:
Anf- f
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
4055 41 St AVENUE
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (561) 568-6700
March 26, 1999
The Honorable Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
Indian River County Board Of County Commissioners
1840 251h Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Re: Law Enforcement Trust Fund
Dear Mr. Macht:
This letter is a request for authorization to expend $1,500 from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund
to pay for a "Non -Violence In Schools" program for Vero Beach High School and Sebastian
River High School. These monies are a part of the 15% we are required to expend or donate
each year under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act to support the operation of any drug
treatment, drug abuse education, drug prevention, crime prevention, safe neighborhood or school
resource programs.
I am requesting this item be placed on the "Consent Agenda" at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or any further information is required, please let me know.
Sincerely,
T7
Crary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
RECEIVED
MAR 3 01999
buhr'a ur COUNTY
COMMISSION
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Lew Enforcement Agency
Accredited by the ComnuiWim on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously authorized the expenditure of
$12500 from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund to pay
for a "Non -Violence in Schools" program for Vero
Beach High School and Sebastian River High
School, as requested.
APRIL 6, 1999
-35-� FL
BOOK 10
L
r
BOOK 103 FADE
Z (,.. CITY OF VERO BEACHAPPOINTMENTS TO COLINTY COMMITTEES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 22, 1999:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Alice E. White, Executive Aide to Board
Date: March 22, 1999
Subject: City of Vero Beach appointments to County committees
It is requested that the Board accept the attach appointments of the City of
Vero Beach to County committees.
Commissioner Ginn questioned whether an appointment from each municipality can
be made to the Beach and Shore Advisory Committee, and Commissioner Adams responded
affirmatively.
ONMOTIONbyCommissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously accepted the following appointments of
the City of Vero Beach to county committees:
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
1999
1. CITY REPRESENTATIVE TO COUNTY RECREATION COMMITTEE
This Committee meets in the first floor conference room at the Cowin Administration Building.
The meetings are held the first Thursday of every other month at 10:00 a.m.
Councilman Jack Grosser - Term to expire January 2000
2. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
This Board meas twice a year in the first floor conference room at the Courcy Administration
Building. The meetings are at 1:00 p.m.
Councilwoman Sandra Bowden - Term to expire January 2002
3. TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
This Board meets the first Wednesday of every mouth at 10:00 a.m. The meetings are held in
conference room #3 in the Roger Poitras Amax Building (off of Virginia Ave.)
Councilwomen Sandra Bowden
4. TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (voting member 1999/2000)
This Board meets the third Friday of each month at 9:30 a.m. The meetings are held at the
Howard Johnson Motor Lodge at 950 U.S.#1 in Stuart
Vice Mayor Tom White
5. COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
This Committee meets the fourth Tuesday of every month at 3:00 p.m. The meetings are
held in the first flour cooferem room at the County Administration Building.
Mayor Art Neuberger
APRIL 6, 1999
6. TOURIST TAX DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
This Committee meets on an as needed basis. The meetings are held in the first floor
conference room at the County Administration Building.
Mayor Art Neuberger
7. MARINE ADVISORY NARROWS WATERSHED ACTION COMMITTEE
This Board meets the third Monday of every other month at 1:30 p.m. The meetings are held in
the first floor confaremce room at the Country Administration building
Vice Mayor Tom White
S. COUNCIL ON AGING
This Board meets the second Wednesday of every month. The meetings are held at 694 14th
Street
Vice Mayor Tom White
9. METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGAMZATION (MPO)
This Board meas the second Wednesday of each month at 10:00 a.m. The meetings are held in
the first floor conference room at the County Administration Building
Councilman Carl Pease, Councilwomen Sandra Bowden and Councilman Jack Grosses, Altemate
Member - Terms expire January 2000
10. LAND ACQUISITION COMMITTEE
This Committee meets the fourth Wednesday of every month at 1:30 p.m. The meetings
are held in the first floor conference room at the County Ammon Building.
Mayor Art Neuberger - Term to expire January 2000
11. COUNCIL OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS
This Board meets the third Wednesday of every month at 9:00 am. The meetings are held in the
first floor conWence room at the County Administration Building
Cocmcilwomen Sandra Bowden
12. AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMMI '=
This Committee meets quarterly. They mea the second Thursday of the month at 3:00
p.m. The meetings are held in the first floor conference room at the County
Administration Building.
Couacilman Jack Grossett
13. JUVENILE JUSTICE COUNCIL
This Board meets the third Thursday of each month at 12:00 p.m. The meetings are held in the
first floor conference room at the County Administration Building
Councilman Jack Grossett
14. AARP
This Board meas the second Friday of every month at 1:30 p.m. at the Community Center
Councilman Jack Grossett
15. COUNTY COMMISSION MEETINGS
The County Commission meets every Tuesday at 9:00 am. in the County Administration
Building.
Councilman Jack Grossett
APRIL 69 1999
-37-
BOOK PAGE
r
BOOK
7A ANNUAL COUNTY TAXDEED APPLICATIONS - 6PARCELS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA
Certified Legal Assistant
THRU: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: March 15, 1999
RE: Annual County Tax Deed Applications
The Clerk of the Circuit Court has notified us that there are 6 parcels that are now eligible for tax
deed applications (as shown on the attached list). In connection with this there are certain fees
that the County must pay (as itemized on the attached list).
Requested Action: Staff requests that the Board approve the payment of $1,835.02 to the Clerk
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the payment of
$1,835.02 to the Clerk in payment of fees regarding
6 tax deed applications, as recommended by staff.
APRIL 69 1999
•
ZS. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT -RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 19, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners .�j�
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney Y"'
DATE: March 19, 1999
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the weeks of March 15, 1999.
Listed below are the vendors names and the
amount of each
court related costs.
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
56.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
56.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
38.50
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Expert Witness
500.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transciption
55.60
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
38.50
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
17.50
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Clinical Evaluation
900.00
Hart Questioned Documents
Expert Witness
521.85
Lab
Treasure Coast Court Report
Court Reporter
1,875.00
Treasure Coast Court Report
Court Reporter
50.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
70.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
31.50
Edward J. Abare. III
Witness Reimbursement
8.70
Linda Copeland
Transcription
164.50
Linda Copeland
Transcription
31.50
Linda Copeland
Transcription
234.50
Soren Barrett, Ph.D
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Soren Barrett, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Medical Record Services
Record Research
4.00
JR Reporting Associates, Inc.
Transcription
73.00
Alan Boetefuer
Witness Reimbursement
1,095.20
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
182.00
Esquire Reporting
Transcription
48.00
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Clinical Evaluation
675.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
91.00
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
31.50
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
59.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
94.50
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
70.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
28.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
203.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
49.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
101.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
73.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
63.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
28.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
63.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
24.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
105.00
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
31.50
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
31.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
17.50
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
199.50
Barbara G. Schopp
Transcription
157.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
42.00
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
38.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
77.00
Esquire Reporting
Transcription
530.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflict -Mild.
2,400.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflict -Juvenile
600.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflict -Felony
300.00
Nancy Dondero, Crescent
Investigator
2,000.00
Research
Linda Copeland
Transcription
35.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
63.00
Olga Maas
Court Interpreter
50.00
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
161.00
APRIL 61 1999
•
-39-
BOOK. FAGE 818
L
Fr' -1
BOOK Fr1ut`
Linda Copeland
Transcription
38.50
Travel by Pegasus
Witness Travel
659.00
Howard Johnson Express Inn
Witness Travel
136.00
James Buchannon
Witness Reimbursement
64,64
Russo Printing
Copies
79.97
Blaine L. Kocoloski
Court Interpreter
88.00
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
64.00
Medical Record Services, Inc.
Record Research
7720
Swope Reconstruction
Expert Witness
1,954.79
Tom
19,227.95
TPO/sw
cc: Judge Kanarek
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
Z T. REsoLVTIoNs 99-029 (LAWRENCE - 43,wAYENDE RIGHT -oF-WAY„ : 99-
030 (VIRGIL PARKER ET UX - 4THSTREET RIGHT-oF-WAV: AND 99-031
aowELL WELLS - PURCHASE oFLAND) - CANCELLING TAXES ON
REuNn Y A co uiRED PROPERTY
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 19, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA
Legal Assistant - County Attorney's Office
DATE: March 19,1999
RE: Recently Acquired Property - Tax Cancellation
The County recently acquired some property and, pursuant to Section 196.28,
F.S., the Board of County Commissioners, after formally accepting it, is allowed
to cancel and discharge any taxes owed on the portion of the property acquired
for public purpose. Such cancellation must be done by resolution with a
cei fled comybeing forward to the Tax Collector (along with copies sent to the
Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Remelted slction Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached resolution
canceling taxes upon land the County recently acquired.
Attachments: Resolutions-R/W - 4t' Street - Parker
R/W - 43rd Avenue - Lawrence
Land Acquisition - Wells
APRIL 69 1999
•
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously adopted Resolution 99-029
cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes (Lawrence - 43' Avenue Right -of -Way).
Re: RM - 43rd Avenue
Lawrence
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 2 9
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 19628, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the some are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1261, Page 378, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 19628, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner A d a m s and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d g e , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 6_ day of
A n r i 1 '1999.
AfteALAZ.Barton lark
� 'By.
BOARDZOFCNTYCOMMISSIONERS
B'Cenneth R. acht
Chairman
APRIL 69 1999
nman a.v* Ca AVfraved Data
aaT:n g z3
I-�
BOOK
T H I S P A G E
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
APRIL 6, 1999
0
-42 0
-
CJ
RD4A
RR4A
RECORDING DEPARTMENT DATE 3/19/99
DOCUMENT SEARCH TIME 16:26:15
Doc# 1118026 Date 3/04/99 Time 1:38 Book 1261 Page 378
Fees - Rcdng-$ 10.50 State-$ 46.90 Intang-$ .00
Type WARRANTY DEED
Brief Desc PINEWOOD S/D METES/BOUNDS IN/NEAR LOT 1 ETC
Dir LAWRENCE, JERALDINE Inv INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Return-Instr CALL To COUNTY ATTORNEY
CMD 1 to return to Main Menu CHD 2 FOR PARCEL NBRS.
APRIL 69 1999
-43- BOOK i� FAGE8�.
CIQ
cam
L.0
C'
PINEVGOD
SUBDIVISION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1 +Begin at the preset Northeast Corner Lot I Piaeaod SubdlVISIOM
the prat of 0'M
N recorded in Plat Book 2 Page 99 of the PLWk Records of
indinn River County, and run
West along the North tine of Lot I a dAstonce of S feet to a point. Then run
N,rth, parallel with the Vest R/V of 43rd Ave., a distance of 30 fest to a point. Then run
East, parallel with the North line of Lot L a distance of 3 feet to a point in the Present
R/V of 43rd Ave. Then run
South, along sold R/V, a distance of 30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNM
Conte" 130 square feet,
lying in Indian River County Florida
PARCEL 2 n Ca no-ce at the said Northeast Comer Lot 1. Pine .00d Subdivisiom the
plat of ehich Is recorded in Plat Book P Page 89 of the Public Records of Indian
River County. and run
North, along the present R/V of 43rd Ave a distance of ime feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
Then
West. .wreml to the said Vest R/V, a distance of 3 feet to a point Then run
North, parallel with the Vest R/V of 43rd Ave., a distance of 38 int to a Point. Then run
NorthVesterly a distance of 41.87 feet to a point lying In the present South R/V line of
SR 60, said point lying 34 Feet, measured along said R/V IFN, iron the Vest R/V line of
43rd Ave. Then run
Easterly along South R/V of S.R. 60 a distance of 34 feet to the Vest R/V lie of 43rd Ave_
Then run
South. along the Vest R/V IFN of 43rd Ave., 68 feet to the POINT
uls Curve OOre�dBEGIMING
LESS that portion Forned by the am of and paralleltVy� swith he o tin line
with aline Southeast
s est tr a 12 -foot /4 o Section t l3/4 of -39 and
tangent
totine Southt to Q tine 50 feet
Canto'67696 square feet.
Lying in Ina . River Cods+ty Florida
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT__
so•
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I an a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the stat
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 611517 of the Florida Administrative Code,
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
/j THIS IS NOTA SURVEY
\`_ Y SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION V-4PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date 46-4'rJG (996
•
1
4
is
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously adopted Resolution 99-030
cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes (Virgil Parker et ux - 4' Street Right -of -
Way).
Re: RM - 401 Street
Virgil Parker at ux
RESOLUTION NO. 99. 3 0
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way Is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1260, Page 1197, which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a cerdf/ed copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner A d a m S , and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner S t a n h r i d qp__, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge
A y e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
ApChelirman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 6 day of
1999.
BOARD OF C NTY COMMISSIONERS
A �K.rton Clerk
B
By.- Kenneth . Macht
Chairman
Y
ave 3e I Accroved pa
APRIL 69 1999
-45-
� 4npL
fArm
•
BOOK i08j FAGS d"Dj
RD4A
RR4A
RECORDING DEPARTMENT
DOCUMENT SEARCH
Doc# 1117233 Date 3/01/99 Time 1:52
Fees - Rcdng-$ 10.50 State-$
Type WRRRANTY DEED
Brief Desc METES/BOUNDS IN/NEAR ETC
LOT SUBDIVISION ' BLK
SE TW RG WEEK TIMESHARE UNIT
13 33 39 APT CONDOMINIUM UNIT
BOOK 103 PAGE 85
DATE 3/19/99
TIME 16:26:49
Book 1260 Page 1197
4.20 Intang-$ .00
Dir PARKER, VIRGIL Inv INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PARKER, MARY LOUISE
Return-Instr CALL To COUNTY ATTORNEY
CMD 1 to return to Main Menu CMD 2 FOR PARCEL NBRS.
APRIL 69 1999
A
CJ
P.O.B.
Scale: 1 =20'
N.W. Cor. of
S.E. 1/ 4 off 4TH , STREET (70' R/W)
o
Sec. 13-33-39
�O
East 115
10�
o
o
-- West 115'
y
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Begin at the N.W. Corner of the N.W. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of Section 13, Township
CD
33 South, Range 39 East, according rn
to the last general plat of the lands of the Indian River Forms Company, recorded in Plot Book 2, Page 25 of the Public N
Records of St. Lucie County, Florida and run
East a distance of 100 feet to a point. Then run
m
South a distance of 10 feet to a point. Then run
West a distance of 115 feet to a point. Then run
a
North a distance of 10 feet to a point. Then run
East a distance of 15 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 1,150 square feet. Now lying in Indian River County, Florida.
c
CERTIFICATION
o
I, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor
and Mapper licensed to practice in the state O
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that
it is accurate and correct. I further certify„
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter
61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code,
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
J
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY a:
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
a
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT c
Chorles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000
Date
a
Q
M
X
W
s
r+
621
t
un
CD
u
BOOK FAGE�
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously adopted Resolution 99-031
cancelling certain delinquent taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes (Lowell Wells - Purchase of Land).
Re: Purchase of Land
Lowell Wells
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 31
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT tO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 19628, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The right of way Is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1262, Page 216 which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future land use for County expansion are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clark to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adam 5, and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d g e , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 6 day of
A p r i l _, 1999.
BOARDOF C. LINTY COMMISSIONERS
Att• K. Barton Clerk
By
By: Kerne R. i ratlhht
Chairman
v
_-�m•.�_�- ®...,.rs.:.-.� :_a•a ::_:.�. .. 102n Aver �ni AOCrove— a -a
/ AUm:n„i
13 kuQ
—d�-
_. N”
APRIL 6, 1999
RD4A RECORDING DEPARTMENT DATE 3/19/99
RR4A DOCUMENT SEARCH TIME 16:28:17
Doc# 1119176 Date 3/10/99 Time 4:13 Book 1262 Page 216
Fees - Rcdng-$ 6.00 State-$ 129.50 Intang-$ .00
Type WARRANTY DEED
Brief Desc BOOKER T WASHINGTON ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF VERO
LOT SUBDIVISION BLK
SE TW RG WEEK TIMESHARE UNIT
APT CONDOMINIUM UNIT
8 5
Dir WELLS, LOWELL H Inv INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Return-Instr CALL To COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE
CMD 1 to return to Main Menu CMD 2 FOR PARCEL NBRS.
APRIL 691999
•
-49- BOOK x.03 PAGE'857
BOOK 103 FADE S58
7. U. TURNER BUILDERS OF VERO BEACH T& DRACAETT "A ERSAND
SUBDIVISION) - INDIANRIVER COUNTY THIRD PARTYDEFENDANT -
APPOINT COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTDlRECTOR BOB KEATING AS
REPRESENTATIVE TO MEDIATION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 3021999:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: tA,& William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: March 30, 1999
SUBJECT: Appointment of a Representative to Mediation
An ongoing civil dispute has been pending between Turner Builders of Vero
Beach, Inc. and Barry S. Drackett (191 Circuit Civil Case No. 94-0182 CA -09).
The case involves a disputed property boundary in the Ambersand Subdivision
on the north barrier island. The predecessor in title to both Turner and Drackett
applied for and obtained a building permit for a structure on the common lot line
between the two properties. Subsequently, Turner applied for and obtained a
building permit and then filed a complaint with Code Enforcement with respect to
Drackett's encroachment onto the Turner lot. The parties filed civil suit taking the
matter out of the jurisdiction of the Code Enforcement Board.
The parties have been ordered to mediation and apparently have come to an
agreement to adjust their common property line. Even with the boundary line
adjustment, the structures would be less than 20 feet and more 19 feet apart.
The side setback line in their zoning district is 10 feet They have requested a
de minimus variance for 0.5 feet or less which has not been granted.
The parties recently named Indian River County as a third -party defendant
because of their inability to come to an agreement among themselves which
would be satisfactory to the Community Development Department The parties
have named Indian River County into the lawsuit and are requesting mediation
as an alternative to trial.
Florida Rules of Civil Procedure regarding mediation require a public entity to
appear at mediation conference by the physical presence of a representative
with full authority to negotiate on behalf of the entity and to recommend
settlement to the appropriate decision-making body of the entity.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize Robert Keating, as representative of the County Commission with full
authority to negotiate and to recommend settlement back to the Board of County
Commissioners. A representative of the County Attorney's Office will attend the
mediation as counsel of record.
APRIL 69 1999
0
-50-
s
r 1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously authorized Robert Keating, as
representative of the County Commission with full
authority to negotiate and to recommend settlement
back to the Board of County Commissioners, as
recommended by staff.
7. Y. CYPRESS LASES PHASE HPLANNED DEVELOPMENT FORMERLY
STONEBRIDGE NORTH) - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 31, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
ol
Robert M. Keating, A4tP
Community Developifient DoL
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Eric Blad /
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: March 31, 1999
SUBJECT: Request for Final Plat Approval for Cypress Lakes Phase H Planned Development
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The overall subject project was approved on September 21, 1996 by the Planning and Zoning
Commission as Stonebridge North. Since then, the developer/property owner has since renamed
the project Cypress Lakes. The total project is a two phase 46.69 acre single family subdivision
containing 108 lots. Located on the north side of 4th Street in the 5300 block, the subject site is
zoned RS -3, Residential Single Family (up to 3 units per acre), and is being developed at a density
of 2.19 units per acre. Cypress Lakes Phase II contains 57 lots, and road rights-of-way. The
proposed Phase II final plat is in conformance with the approved conceptual plan and the approved
preliminary PD plan/plat.
At its regular meeting of December 17,1996, the Board of County Commissioners granted planned
development special exception use approval for the overall project. The Board's action made
effective the two phase preliminary PD plat approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Subsequently, a land development permit was issued for construction of the improvements required
to serve the proposed planned development Because construction of some required improvements
(e.g. survey monumentation) has not been completed at this time, the developer is proposing to
"bond -out" to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the remaining work to be performed. The
applicant, Stonebridge North, Inc.., through its agent Onsite Management Group Inc., is now
requesting final plat approval for Cypress Lakes Phase I and has submitted the following:
APRIL 6, 1999
•
-51-
BOOK FADE.
L
BOOK 103 fm' b
1. A final plat in conformance with the approved conceptual and preliminary PD plan/plat;
2. A Contract for Construction of the remaining required subdivision improvements.
3. An Engineer's Certified Cost Estimate for completion of the remaining required subdivision
improvements;
4. A security agreement and cash bone acceptable to the county womey's office, to guarantee
the submitted Contract for Construction.
Not all of the required subdivision improvements have been completed as of this date (i.e.
landscaping buffers, roadways, stormwater management, and utility services). However, the
developer desires to proceed with recording the plat and proposes to "bond -out" for construction of
the remaining required on-site improvements pursuant to the provisions of subdivision ordinance
section 913.10. An itemized certified engineer's cost estimate for completion of the remaining
improvements has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, Utilities Services
Department, and the Community Development Department. The developer has submitted a contract
for construction of required improvements and posted suitable security, approved by the County
Attorney's Office, to guarantee the contract. The contract, which is on a standard form approved by
the County Attorney's Office, requires all improvements to be completed within one year. With
those documents, the developer has complied with the appropriate requirements to obtain final plat
approval.
Platting will allow lot sales and construction of single family homes. However, under the
subdivision ordinance, no certificates of occupancy will be issued until required improvements are
completed and deemed acceptable.
Based upon the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
grant final plat approval for Cypress Lakes Phase H, authorize the Chairman to execute the Contract
for Construction, and Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously granted final plat approval for
Cypress Lakes Phase IL authorized the Chairman to
execute the Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements and Cash Deposit and Escrow
Agreement, as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
APRIL 69 1999
0
-52- 0
Z W. AIRMASTERS LEASE AT FAIRGROUNDS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 31, 1999:
March 31, 1999
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: FRAN B. ADAMS, COMMISSIONER
RE: AIRMASTERS LEASE AT FAIRGROUNDS
The model airplane club, the Airmasters, currently leases from Indian River
County 2.98 acres at the Fairgrounds. They pay $200 per year for the lease. They have
always been on time with their payment.
The Indian River Archers pay $200 for a 27.4 acre lease and have exclusive use of
the property.
The Soccer Association leases 16.5 acres at $200 per year and have exclusive
right to the fields, meaning no other groups use that area
When we leased the soccer fields, we restricted the Airmasters group use of the
property because they cannot fly when those fields are in use, due to safety and liability
concerns. When there are events at the Fairgrounds, they are unable to use their lease.
And when the Fair is operating, their runway is a parking lot. So the Airmasters have in
effect been shortchanged in their lease with the County.
My suggestion would be to lower the lease amount to $50 per year. They have
less than a 3 acre area to work on and their time has been curtailed considerably by the
other permitted uses.
Attached is a copy of their insurance and the $50 check they had tendered in good
faith pending the outcome of our decision. Their lease runs from April 1.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved lowering the
Airmasters lease amount to $50 per year.
APRIL 6, 1999
_53_r
BOOK 103 mn
L
500K
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 99-032 -
CONFIRMING PAVING & DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 1ST STREET BETWEEN 16TH
AVENUE AND 18TH AVENUE
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FME IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 2621999:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director March 26, 1999
AND
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., CountVEngn
'
FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, C.E.T., Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage Improvements to ? Street between
16d Avenue and I B& Avenue, Indian River County Project #9721
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION
On March 2, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 99-20 providing for
certain paving and drainage improvements to I° Street between 10" Avenue and 18s' Avenue.
A petition was received from the property owners on this road.
Four (4) property owners out of six (6) property signed the petition making it 67% in favor of having
this road paved.
On March 2, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution 99-21 setting
the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment
against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for April 6, 1999.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners move to approve the assessment roll, and
confirming resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the April 6, 1999 Public Hearing.
Revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded to Chairman of the Board for
signature.
The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are available for viewing in the Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioner's office.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 99-032 confirming
the assessment roll for certain paving and drainage
improvements to 14 Street between 16* Avenue and
18' Avenue.
APRIL 6, 1999
-54-
•
Confirming (Third Reso.) 3/25/97(ENG)RES3.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 99-32
A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING
THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO VC Street between
16th Avenue and 18th Avenue.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County adopted Resolution No. 99-20, providing for certain
paving and drainage improvements to lit Street between 16th
Avenue and 18th Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which the
special assessments are to be made and how the special
assessments are to be paid; and
WHEREAS, the resolution was published as required by
Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County passed Resolution No. 99-21, on March 2, 1999, which
set a time and place for a public hearing at which the owners
of the properties to be assessed and other interested persons
would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints
as to said project and said special assessments, and for the
Board to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian River
County Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public
hearing was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal
Newspaper on March 16, 1999, and March 23, 1999, (twice one
week apart, and the last being at least one week prior to the
hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County
Code; and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at
least ten days prior to the hearing, as required by Section
206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County on Tuesday, April 6, 1999 9:05 A.M. conducted the
public hearing with regard to the special assessments,
APRIL 69 1999
-55- BOOK
1�1� '
600K PAGE 8
RESOLUTION NO. 99-32
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD 08 COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their
entirety.
2. The Board finds that the properties assessed by this
resolution will receive special benefits equal to or
greater than the cost of the assessment.
3. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment
roll are hereby confirmed and approved, and shall remain
legal, valid, and binding first liens against the
Properties assessed until paid in full.
4. The County will record the special assessments and this
resolution, which describes the properties assessed and
the amounts of the special assessments, on the public
records, which shall constitute prima facie evidence of
the validity of the special assessments.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Adams , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
T i p p i n , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Vice Chairman Fran Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this 6 day of adA .9 , 1999.
BOARD OF CO Y COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN R R CO FLORIDA
By
nneth Macht
Chairman
Ban, Cle�
A�ttJachment - AS BMENT ROLL
confirm.res.1stSt.MAG
APRIL 69 1999
• -56-
•
•
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: 1ST STREET FROM 16TH AVENUE TO 18TH AVENUE
TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 919.1
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS.......... $20,468.36
PROJECT NO 9721 COST PER FRONT FOOT.... $22.27
FRONT
NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST
* 1.
Richard M. & Winifred L. Whitney
14-33-39-00017-0005-00001.0
100.00
$22.27
$2,227.00
1605 1st Street
Lot 1, Block E, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
2.
Edmund B. Chudzinski
14-33-39-00017-0005-00007.0
158.90
$22.27
$3,538.70
501 Belfast Terrace
Lot 7, Block E, Moreland S/D
Sebastian, Florida 32958
PBI 4-12
3.
Norma L. Grace
14-33-39-00017-0005-00008.0
95.00
$22.27
$2,115.65 1
27 Willow Road
Lot 8, Block E, Moreland S/D
Greenville, RI 02828
PBI 4-12
* 4.
William M. & Janice K, Smith, Jr.
14-33-39-00017-0005-00009.0
100.00
$22.27
$2,227.00
130 18th Avenue
Lot 9, Block E, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
* 5
Larry R & Lucy Kline
14-33-39-00017-0004-00002.0
100.00
$22.27
$2,227.00
1626 1 st Street
Lot 2, Block D, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
9721 PRE.WK4 1 03/11199
0
M
�r
I
Ga
P111
IEL
01.
CIO
CD
C13
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: 1ST STREET FROM 16TH AVENUE TO 18TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO 9721
NAME & ADDRESS
* 6. Larry R. & Lucy Kline
16261 st Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
* 7. William W. & Janice K. Smith
13018th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
* = SIGNED PETITION
9721PRE.WK4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
14-33-39-00017-0004-00003.0
Lot 3, Block D, Moreland S/D
PBI 4-12, OR Book 444, PP 594
14-33-39-00017-0004-00004.0
The Moreland S/D, Lot 4, Bl. D, LESS Ely 100
feet & also LESS the following described
parcel: Beg at SE cor of Lot 6, S 61.13 ft
more or less to edge of water of an existing
lake as shown on said plat, th meander Wly
along edge of water to a point, said point being
53.0 ft more or less S of SW cor of Lot 6, th N
to SW cor of Lot 6 th along S line to POB,
LESS that portion of Lot 4, Bl. D being more
particularly described as follows: Beg at the
found 4" x 4" concrete monument marking
the SW cor of said Lot 5
2
TOTAL FRONT FEET..........
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS..........
COST PER FRONT FOOT....
FRONT
FOOTAGE
100.00
265.20
COST/F.F.
$22.27
$22.27
919.1
$20,468.36
$22.27
TOTAL COST
$2,227.00
$5,906.00
919.10 $22.27 $20,468.36 ON
TOTAL FRONT COST PER F.F. TOTALASSESSMENT 0�
FOOTAGE
�O
03/11/99
:7
00
h
40
•
•
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 99-033 -
CONFIRMING PAVING & DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 181H AVENUE BETWEEN IST
PLACE AND 2 -ND STREET
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 11, 1999:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Direct
AND
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engin
FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, C.E.T., Civil Engineer J
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage Improvements to 181 Avenue
between 1" Place and 2°d Street. IRC Project No. 9606
DATE: March 11, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On March 2, 1999 the Board of County Cominissioners adopted Resolution No. 99-18 providing for
certain paving and drainage improvements to 18d' Avenue between 1" Place and 2a6 Street.
A petition was received from the property owners on this road.
Six (6) property owners out of eight (8) property owners signed the petition making it 75% in favor
of having this road paved.
On March 2, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution 99-19 setting
the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment
against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for April 6, 1999.
RECONMMMATIONS
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners move to approve the assessment roll, and
confirming resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the April 6, 1999 Public Hearing.
Revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded to Chairman of the Board for
signature.
The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are available for viewing in the Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioner's office.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Harold Ballard, 176 18' Avenue, questioned whether frontage from his property —
would be taken to widen this road, and Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that all
work will be confined to the existing right-of-way.
APRIL 6. 1999
-59-
BOOK PAGE
BOOK 103 FADE 868
In response to further questions from Mr. Ballard, Director Davis offered to meet with
him and confirmed that the County will honor any existing driveways and culverts and that
the cost will not exceed the amount stated in Mr. Ballard's notice.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ONMOTIONby Commissioner Crinn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 99-033 confirming
the assessment roll for certain paving and drainage
improvements to 18t` Avenue between ? Place and
2d Street.
Confirming (Third Rosa.) 3/25/97(ENG)RES3.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 33
A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING
THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 18th Avenue between
1st Place and 2nd Street.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County adopted Resolution No. 99-18, providing for certain
paving and drainage improvements to 18th Avenue between 1't
Place and 2"d Street; and
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which the
special assessments are to be made and how the special
assessments are to be paid; and
WHEREAS, the resolution was published as required by
Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
Coup
ty passed Resolution No. 99-19, on March 2, 1999, which
set a time and place for a public hearing at which the owners
of the properties to be assessed and other interested persons
would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints
as to said project and said special assessments, and for the
BoAd to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian River
County Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public
hearing was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal
Newspaper on March 16,1999, and March 23, 1999, (twice one
APRIL 69 1999
0
-60- •
•
11
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 33
week apart, and the last being at least one week prior to the
hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County
Code; and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at
least ten days prior to the hearing, as required by Section
206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County on Tuesday, April 6, 1999 9:05 A.M. conducted the
public hearing with regard to the special assessments,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their
entirety.
2. The Board finds that the properties assessed by this
resolution will receive special benefits equal to or
greater than the cost of the assessment.
3. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment
roll are hereby confirmed and approved, and shall remain
legal, valid, and binding first liens against the
properties assessed until paid in full.
4. The County will record the special assessments and this
resolution, which describes the properties assessed and
the amounts of the special assessments, on the public
records, which shall constitute prima facie evidence of
the validity of the special assessments.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Ginn , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
S t a n b r i d %ffid , upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Vice Chairman Fran Adams Aye
Commissioner John B. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this 6 day of April , 1999
BOARD OF C TYISSIONERS
INDIA�RR COUNT FLORIDA
By �
enneth R acht
Chairman
n"Yacent-'�ASSZSS on lark
NT ROLL \J
confm.res.18Ave.MAG
APRIL 69 1999
BOOK �qG�
no
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CDCDm
TO: 18TH AVENUE FROM 1ST PLACE TO 2ND STREET
TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 846
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS.......... $17,080.74
PROJECT NO, 9606 COST PER FRONT FOOT.... $20.19
FRONT
NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST
1. William C. Ware 14-33-39-00017-0001-00008.0 106.30 $20.19 $2,146.20
r
•
0
166 18th Avenue
Lot 8, Block A, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
* 2.
Harold D. & Wilma Lee Ballard
14-33-39-00017-0001-00009.0
105.50
$20.19
$2,130.05
17618th Avenue
Lot 9, Block A, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
* 3.
Grace L. Miller
14-33-39-00017-0001-00010.0
105.00
$20.19
$2,119.95
186 18th Avenue
Lot 10, Block A, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
* 4.
George A & Patricia DeForest,111
14-33-39-00017-0001-00011.0
106.20
$20.19
$2,144.18
196 18th Avenue
Lot 11, Block A, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
* 5
Roman J. & Virginia J. Walewski
14-33-39-00017-0002-00001.0
106.3
$20.19
$2,146.20
1805 2nd Street
Lot 1, Block B, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12, OR Book 444, PP 594
9606PRE.WK4
1
03/11/99
r
•
0
•
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: 18TH AVENUE FROM 1ST PLACE TO 2ND STREET
TOTAL FRONT FEET.......... 846
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS.......... $17,080.74
PROJECT NO. 9606 COST PER FRONT FOOT.... $20.19
FRONT
NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST
6. George F. & Beveraly Jean Evans 14-33-39-00017-0002-00002.0 105 $20.19 $2,119.95
27920 Knickerbocker
Lot 2, Block B, Moreland S/D
Bay Village, OH 44140
PBI 4-12, OR Book 459, PP 791
* 7. Daniel L. & Rose B. Schmitz
14-33-39-00017-0002-00003.0
175 18th Avenue
Lot 3, Block B, Moreland S/D
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
PBI 4-12
* 8. Neil R & Linda Manning
18201 st Place
Vero Beach, Florida 32962
* = SIGNED PETITION
9606PRE.WK4
0
14-33-39-00017-0002-00004.0
Lot 4, Block B, Moreland S/D
PBI 4-12
2
105.5 $20.19 $2,130.05
106.2 $20.19 $2,144.18
846.00 $20.19 $17,080.74
TOTAL FRONT COST PER F.F. TOTAL ASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE
03/11/99
s
w
c
he -
CD
0
cc
M
�O
BOOK 103 FAGE 87
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - WESTON REAL ESTATE
INVESTMENT CORP. - BH FLORIDA LAND JOINT
VENTURE - CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN AND SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR 176 -UNIT PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWN AS BERMUDA CLUB
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 2521999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DMSION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
o Keating, P '�
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John McCoy, AICP !!!�
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: March 25, 1999
SUBJECT: Weston Real Estate Investment Corporation's Request for Conceptual PD Plan
and Special Exception Use Approval for a 176 Unit Planned Development to be
known as Bermuda Club
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
R.K. Engineering Inc. has submitted an application for conceptual PD plan and special exception
use approval on behalf of the Weston Real Estate Investment Corporation to construct a 176 unit
planned development to be known as Bermuda Club. The project consists of a mix of 92 single-
family and 84 multi -family units.
The subject property is located between SR A -1-A and the Indian River Lagoon, just north of Sea
Oaks. Although the subject property has frontage on Jungle Trail, formal access will be from SR
A -1-A. The entire subject property is zoned RM -6, residential multi -family (up to 6 unitslacre),
which is the same zoning as Sea Oaks to the south, and Disney's Vero Beach Resort and Coralstone
Club to the north and east. The density for the proposed development is 3.12 unitstacre.
Planning and Zoning Commission Action:
At its regular meeting of February 11, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
unanimously (6-0) to approve the PD special exception use request with modifications to the
conditions recommended by staff Relative to the protection of archeological sites, the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended that the developer be required to involve staff and a consulting
archeologist in pre -construction meetings for all phases and that a consulting archeologist be on-site
for all phases of construction. Staffs condition is similar but pertains only to the phases adjacent
to Jungle Trail, determined to have archeological resources. Also, the Planning and Zoning
Commission approved the preliminary PD plan for the entire project, subject to the Board of County
Commissioners approval of the PD special exception use request.
APRIL 6, 1999
0
Historic Resource Advisory Committee Action:
At its special meeting of March 19, 1999, the historic Resource Advisory Committee (HRAC)
considered issues relating to archeological protection on the Bermuda Club property. Relative to
that, the HRAC recommended that pre -construction meetings be held with staff and a consulting
archaeologist for all construction phases, and that a consulting archeologist be required on-site
during the clearing and earthwork for the phase adjacent to Jungle Trail only. This recommendation
is consistent with staffs recommendation contained at the end of this report. Thus, the
recommendation of staff and the HRAC require special archeological measures for the project phase
adjacent to Jungle Trail. The Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, however, would
require special measures in all project phases.
Also, the Historic Resource Advisory Committee considered the alignment of Jungle Trail through
this area. As explained in fWther detail later in this report, the developer is proposing to trade right-
of-way area so as to keep Jungle Trail in its crnrent location rather than shift it eastward, away from
the lagoon shoreline. Relative to this Jungle Trail issue, new information was uncovered since the
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. This new information indicates that m the mid-1980s
the county and the previous developer (Florida Land Company) swapped deeds for right-of-way and
land to facilitate a new alignment of Jungle Trail. That new alignment, if implemeW4 would move
Jungle Trail eastward from its present alignment. Based on this information, the HRAC
recommended that the deeds be swapped back to provide for a right-of-way alignment that
corresponds to the present Jungle Trail roadway alignment. That recommendation is also
incorporated into the staff recommendation contained at the end of this report.
PD Project Process
As a PD, the process involved in review and approval of this project is as follows:
A.rmtoval Needed Reviewing Body
1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception PZC & BCC
2. Preliminary PD Plan PZC
3. Land Development Permits or waiver Staff
4. Final PD Plat BCC
The applicant has requested approval of the first two steps. If the conceptual plan/special exception
is approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the preliminary PD plan approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission will become effective, and the applicant will next obtain a land
development permit for the required PD infinstructure improvements.
Board of County Commissioners Consideration
The Board of County Commissioners is now to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
conceptual plan/special exception use request. Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board
of County Commissioners is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site
and surrounding area The county may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate
impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
1. Size of Development: 56.32 acres
2. Zoning: RM -6, Residential Multi -Family (up to 6 units/acre)
3. Land Use Designation: L-2 Low Density 2 (up to 6 units/acre)
4. Density: Allowed 6 units/acre
Proposed: 3.12 units/am
5. Open Space: Required: 400% or 22.52 acres
Provided: 590/6 or 32.28 acres
Note: The open space area provided does not include credit for any existing or proposed
lakes.
APRIL 61,1999
-65-
BOGS Ful
,
0
BOOK 1 FAGS 87
6. Recreation Area: Required: 92,048 sq. R
Provided: 94,960 sq. R
Note: The recreation area is provided at the two proposed clubhouse sites and does not
include any pedestrian paths, lakes or common open space. The clubhouse sites will
require separate administrative site plan approvals prior to their development. Also,
the project site has deeded beach access which is not included in the recreation area.
7. Phasing: The developer has indicated that the project will be developed in four
separate phases, moving from east to west across the total project site, as
follows:
Phase I Infrastructure for 37 single-family lots and unit construction
Phase II Infiastructure for 23 single-family lots and unit construction
Phase III Infrastructure for 32 single-family lots and unit construction
Phase IV InfrWtructure for 84 multi -family units and unit construction
Note: Each phase will include the necessary improvements and amenities to independently
meet all applicable IDR requirements.
8. Parking: Single -Family Units: Required: 2 spaces per unit
Provided: 2 spaces per unit
Multi -Family Units: Required: 168 spaces (for 84 units)
Provided: 168 spaces (for 84 units)
Note: Parking for the multi -family buildings will be provided on the lowest floor ("under")
the buildings. Additional parking will be provided at the two clubhouse sites.
9. Environmental Issues:
Uplands: Since the project contains over 5 acres, the native upland set-aside requirements
of section 929.05 apply. The site was selectively cleared for development by a previous
developer in the mid-1980s, and some preliminary infrastructure improvements were
commenced There remain scattered pockets of native upland communities throughout the
site which total approximately 9.77 acres. The applicant is proposing to preserve 3.11 acres
of upland vegetation, an amount which exceeds the 1.46 acres (15% of the total uplands
vegetation area) required by the county's upland setaside regulations. A conservation
easement preserving these uplands will need to be established prior to or via final plat
approval.
Wetlands: There are several areas of wetlands on the subject site, totaling 5.85 acres. The
applicant is proposing to alter all of the wetlands east of Jungle Trail (3.27 acnes). Those
wetlands are currently impacted and consist mostly of Brazilian peppers. The 2.31 acres of
wetlands located west of Jungle Trail (which consists mostly of mangroves, with some
Brazilian Peppers) will be restored and preserved. The applicant will need to obtain all
necessary jurisdictional agency permits for wetland alterations prior to issuance of a land
development permit.
• Endangered Species: Gopher tortoise is the only endangered species that has been identified
on the site. The applicant will take the steps required by jurisdictional agencies to protect
or relocate the gopher tortoises found on site.
• Docks: No docks are being proposed or approved with this application. Any future proposal
for docks will require a separate application and review.
10. Stor awater Management: The preliminary PD plan stormwater management system has
been reviewed and approved by the Public Works department. The stormwater, system will
consist of a series of lakes that will eventually outfall into a section of the Indian River
Lagoon that is classified as Outsmadmg Florida Waters (OFW). The stormwater plan takes
the OFW classification into account, in regard to water quality requirements. Final review
and approval of the stormwater management plan will be accomplished through the land
development permit process,
11. Thoroughfare Plan: The project fronts on SR A-1 A which is designated on the Thoroughfare
Plan as an arterial roadway requiring 120' of right-of-way. Presently, there is 100' of existing
right-of-way; therefore, an additional 10' may need to be acquired on both sides of SR A -1-A
in the fitu e. Although the Public Works department does not wish to acquire the additional
10' at this time, the proposed Plan accommodates a future 10' acquisition from the project
site.
APRIL 6, 1999
IM
12. Traffic Circulation: The project will be accessed from SRA 1 A by an internal roadway that
will serve as the main east1west road for the development. Cul-de-sacs and loop roads will
branch north and south off the main road and will provide access to proposed individual lots
and multi -family buildings. All of these proposed roads will be private.
A traffic impact analysis has been submitted by the applicant and approved by the county
Traffic Engineering division. The analysis indicates that a northbound left turn lane and
southbound right -tum lane are required improvements on SR A 1-A at the proposed project
entrance. These improvements are depicted on the plans and will need to be constructed
prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy.
The applicant is proposing to use Jungle Trail to access a circular drive and gazebo on the
5.24 acre portion of the project located west of Jungle Trail. That site will have a low
intensity, passive recreation use that is looted outside of the 2.31 acre estuarine wetland
area that is to be preserved. Due to the low trip generation/attraction characteristics of the
proposed passive recreation area, staff has no objections to use of Jungle Trail to access the
site. No other access alternatives exist.
13. Dedication and Improvements:
Emergency Access: The applicant depicts an emergency access point in the
southwest corner of the development. That access will connect the internal project
roadway system to the existing north beach water treatment plant road, which is
paved and runs from the county's water treatment plant to Jungle Trail along the
western two-thirds of the project's south property line. Final location and
construction details of the emergency access point will need to be approved by the
Department of Emergency Services prior to the issuance of a land development
pest.
SR A -1-A Pedestrian Path: The Florida Department of Transportation recently
completed a pedestrian path along this project's SR A -1-A frontage. Therefore, the
developer has no responsibility for this improvement.
14. Pedestrian Circulation: The project will have internal sidewalks to provide pedestrian access
within the project. This system will also connect to the SR A -1-A pedestrian path and to
Jungle Trail. Also, an off-site pedestrian path for project residents will be provided to the
beach, via the project's deeded beach access.
15. Utilities: County water and wastewater services are available to the site, and connection is
required. The project will connect to county water and wastewater services. These utility
provisions have been approved by the county Utility Services and Environmental Health
departments.
16. Street Names: The applicant is proposing the use of street names. This is subject to review
and approval by the planning staff in accordance with Chapter 951 requirements. Staff has
no objection to the use of names, which is customary on the barrier island and is specifically
allowed on the barrier island by section 951.05(4) of the county's land development
regulations.
17. Proposed Waivers: Through the PD process, the applicant is requesting the following
waivers from standard RM -6 district requirements:
nu►t:: -oro zs PD perm . soma applis mmughm aro pmjm
APRIL 69 1999
-67- 9
BOOK IUJ PAGE U j
RM -6 DISTRICT
NMUM UMS
PROPOSED PD
NE94E IUMS
Lot Width
70'
65'
Front Setback
25'
25' (no waiver requested)
Side Setback
10'
*5' / *7.5'
Rear Setback
25'
*15'
Building Coverage
300/6
40% (no waiver requested)
Lot Size
7,000 sq. R
7,600 sq. R (no waiver
requested)
nu►t:: -oro zs PD perm . soma applis mmughm aro pmjm
APRIL 69 1999
-67- 9
BOOK IUJ PAGE U j
I
0
-76
BOOK 108 FACE S�
1. The side setback for 65' wide lots is 5, and 7S' for 85' wide lots.
2. Setbacks for pools, patios and decks will be allowed and controlled as provided for
in LDR section 911.15(2), which applies to standard single-family homes.
3. The applicant is requesting that the project road right-of-way widths be reduced to
a minimum 24' with 17 wide utility easements on either side. This would form a 58'
wide roadway and utility corridor along project roadways. Utilities and public works
have no objection to this reduced right-of-way width waiver.
18. Jungle Trail: The proposed development has approximately 1,240' of frontage on Jungle
Trail, a road which has been designated as scenic and historic and is recognized as a state
greenway. The following issues relate to Jungle Trail:
Jungle Trail Landscape Buffer. The county's adopted Jungle Trail Management Plan
requires a planted buffer anytime property is cleared within 30' of Jungle Trail. Such
a buffer is required for the project because the applicant will need to clear most of the
area along the project's Jungle Trail frontage to remove nuisance exotic vegetation.
The applicant has provided a conceptual landscape plan section for vegetation
replacement and enhancement, and this plan is in compliance with the Jungle Trail
Management Plan. Prior to issuance of a land development permit for the multi-
family area, the developer shall submit a landscape plan that shows the final location
of Jungle Trail buffer plant material, and shall obtain planning staff approval of the
plan. Specifically, the proposed landscape plan must meet the following Jungle Trail
Management Plan criteria:
• The vegetation to be planted must be consistent with the suggested native
plant list in the Management Plan.
• The native plantings must be intermixed throughout the protected area to
promote a natural appearance, and must provide a visual buffer a minimum
of seven feet in height and 60% opacity continuous throughout the area,
within two years of planting.
• No single planted species shall comprise more than 20% of the plantings.
• A minimum of 50016 of the planting area shall be covered with tree canopy at
maturity.
Jungle Trail Right -of -Way: Along this project's Jungle Trail frontage, there are two
right-of-way alignments for Jungle Trail. There is the historic or western alignment
which contains the existing, actual travelway. Also, the second right-of-way, located
east of the existing alignment, was deeded from the subject property to the County
in the mid-1980s. The deeding of additional right-of-way was the result of an
agreement entered into between the Board of County Commissioners and Florida
Land Company (a previous owner/developer) on June 6, 1984 to settle a lawsuit
concerning riparian rights.
Under the terms of the 1984 agreement, Florida Land Company was to dedicate
(deed) the easterly alignment to the County and stabilize the shoreline along Jungle
Trail. In turn, the county was to concede its riparian rights associated with Jungle
Trail to Florida Land Company by deeding the existing alignment to Florida Land
Company, and then re -aligning that portion of Jungle Trail into the easterly right-of-
way. The county deeded the right-of-way to Florida Land Company, but Jungle
Trail was never realigned because Florida Land Company breached the agreement
by failing to escrow funds for the shoreline stabilization. Consequently, the Jungle
Trail travelway may not presently be located in county right-of-way.
The applicant is requesting, and the I3istoric Resource Advisory Committee and staff
are recommending, that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the county
and applicant to swap back right-of-ways that were deeded in 1984. This will
generally undo the 1984 agreement. The applicant and the county could swap right-
of-way giving the county clearer title to the actual travelway of Jungle Trail, and
giving the applicant a contiguous project site east of the actual Jungle Trail
travelway. The new deed would establish a right-of-way alignment which is slightly
more landward than the alignment of the Jungle Trail maintenance map right-of-way
which was subsequently deeded to Florida Land Company. The stabilization of
Jungle Trail and the applicant's riparian rights will not be resolved with this
authorization. Rather, the county is proposing to stabilize Jungle Trail, and the
applicant can submit an application for waterfront structures (docks) at a later date
APRIL 6, 1999 to try to establish myriparian rights.
-68-
C
•
•
Note: Currently, a gap exists between the 1984 alignment deeded to the county and
the actual travelway. This gap area is owned by the applicant. The proposed deed
swap will eliminate this gap.
It is important to note that the proposed PD plan provides space to meet the setbacks
and buffering outside of and in addition to the 1984 Jungle Trail right-of-way area.
Therefore, the decision on the right -of -Way request will not affect the proposed PD
plan nor the proposed setbacks and buffering between the existing Jungle Trail
travelway and the proposed development. Thus, under the proposed PD plan, any
right-of-way that might be deeded back from the county would merely remain as
open space between the physical Trail and proposed buffers. The developer has
committed to maintain a 50' setback for all structures from the east edge of the 1984
right-of-way, which is a recommended condition of approval.
19. Archaeological Sites: The applicant has prepared an archaeological survey of the site, which
has been reviewed and approved by the State of Florida, Division of Historic Resources.
That survey has also been reviewed by the Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC).
The developer has agreed to follow the findings of the archaeological survey, which is
consistent with the review and recommendation of the HRAC. Those findings call for the
developer to:
• Identify and avoid archaeological middens known to occur in the area If such
avoidance is not feasible, a Phase II archaeological survey must be conducted prior
to construction in those areas.
• Hold a pre -construction meeting with an archaeologist, county staff and the
developer prior to construction for any phases. The purpose of such meetings will
be to identify specific areas to be avoided.
• Have an Archaeologist on site during the land clearing and earthwork portion of
construction, for the areas adjacent to Jungle Trail, presently depicted as the multi-
family section (Phase M.
• Conduct a new archaeological survey if there is a proposed change in the
development layout near Jungle Trail.
A Phase II survey is a more intense systematic and comprehensive exploration and
investigation of potential archaeological sites which may include controlled excavation. Any
Phase II or additional survey work that may be required will involve coordination between
the developer, the county, and the state.
20. Landscape and Buffering: The landscape and buffering plan meets the criteria of Chapter
926. Other than the Jungle Trail buffer, there are no special buffers required along any other
Property line. However, the Sea Oaks property owners are requesting that as many canopy
trees as possible be preserved along a portion of the project's south property line that is east
of the water plant. Staff recommends that Kone) canopy tree be preserved or planted for
every 50 lineal feet of that property line.
21. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Disney's Vero Beach Resort, Coralstone Club, Vacant/RM-6, A-1
South: Sea Oaks, Indian River Lagoon/RM-6
East: Coralstone, Disney's Vero Beach Resort/RM-6
West: Indian River Lagoon, Vacant/RS-1
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1.
Authorize the county to accept the Jungle Trail right-of-way from the developer and
the Chairman to sign a quit claim deed to swap the Jungle Trail right-of-way, when
requested by the County Attorney's office, and
APRIL 69 1999
-69- BOOK 103, EDGES7
BOOK 10 PAGE d
2. Approve the conceptual PD plan and special exception use request with the following
conditions.
A. Prior to Land Development Permit issuance for any phase, the applicant
shall:
1. Obtain from the Department of Emergency Services approval of the
final location and design of an emergency access; and
2. Obtain jurisdictional permits for all wetland filling; and
3. Submit a final Jungle Trail landscape buffer plan and obtain planning
staff approval of the plan.
B. Prior to issuance of a Land Development Permit for any phase, the applicant
shall hold a pre -construction meeting with county staff and a consulting
archeologist to identify known archaeological sites that are to be avoided.
C. Prior to issuance of any C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy), the northbound left -
turn lane and southbound right -tum deceleration lane at the project's SR
A -1-A entrance shall be constructed and accepted by the FDOT.
APRIL 611999
•
D. Prior to the issuance of a C.O. in Phase I, a canopy tree must be planted or
preserved for every 50 lineal feet of the project's south property line that is
east of the water treatment plaUL
E. Prior to issuance of a C.O. in the multi -family section (Phase IV) of the
project, the Jungle Trail buffer shall be planted, inspected and approved by
planning staff.
F. Prior to or via the final plat, a conservation easement shall be established for
the upland vegetation conservation area.
G. All structures shall be set back a minimum of 50' from the east edge of the
1984 Jungle Trail right-of-way line.
H. The developer shall have "Phase 11" testing conducted for any archeological
sites identified within any area of development, if applicable, and shall have
a new archeological survey conducted if any improvements are proposed
closer to Jungle Trail than depicted on the currently approved PD plan.
I. The developer shall have an archaeologist on site during the land clearing and
earthworks portion of constriction for any phases adjacent to Jungle Trail,
presently depicted on the multi -family section (Phase IV).
-70- 40
Senior Planner John McCoy reviewed the memorandum and discussed the
archaeological issues and Jungle Trail alignment. The right-of-way swap with Florida Land
Company occurred but the shoreline was never stabilized. The Historical Resources
Advisory Committee is recommending that the County give back the upland right-of-way but
this solution does not address the riparian rights nor the shoreline stabilization.
Commissioner Ginn questioned the multi -family building on the west side closest to
the river, and Mr. McCoy advised that the conceptual plan calls for 3 living floors with an
underground garage, all of which meet the 35 -foot height limit.
Commissioner Ginn felt the building was too close to the river.
Commissioner Stanbridge questioned whether there were any plans for docks and
noted that the archeological report was very poor.
Commissioner Ginn then questioned the turnaround and gazebo west of Jungle Trail
and, after discussion, staff was directed to add a condition that traffic west of Jungle Trail
could only be by foot, with no vehicles allowed.
Commissioner Ginn then questioned the stormwater drainage into the Indian River,
and Community Development Director Bob Keating advised that stormwater will first drain
into the lake and then SJRWMD allows outfall to the river in storms of great magnitude.
Commissioner Stanbridge noted that there are quite a few environmentally sensitive
sites in this area and felt that it would be critical that these sites be protected.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
John Genoni, 3410 Harbor City Boulevard, Melbourne, commented regarding some
of the issues. He noted that two-thirds of the site is dedicated to single-family housing and
that there is a 25 -foot buffer around the entire site. All of the interior roads have green
buffers in the rear of all lots. Regarding the archeologist's report, most of those resources
are located on the west side of the property and there will be no development in that area.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
APRIL 69 1999
-71- .��.
800K JOB Fn -Lb J
BOOK O�' flA`E c J
Commissioner Tippin commented that there has been parking all over Jungle Trail
for years and the turnaround would be an obvious place to park. He had no problem with
the gazebo.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board,
by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Tippin opposed)
approved the conceptual PD plan and special
exception use request with the conditions
recommended by staff, and the following changes:
(1) paragraph 1 of staff's recommendation shall be
a condition rather than a recommendation and (2)
only foot traffic will be allowed west of Jungle Trail
on the Tract Q-2 site as reflected by the following:
Z-- --i ' i' * i
i i r, ` ,� i i i i i i+ i i i i i i i i i i i ,� •
. r
'�' i • .r i i i i i i i
i '► . � �� TAT' i W .r i
CRE ONSITE "SAVT W ATEit MANOROVE i i • i .iiiii i
VD. TO 13E 'PRESERVED*
�i ii . i i i �•cT q� • - i i .
5.24 ACRE TRACT
WEST OF JUNGLE TRAIL R/W
I.= a
EX. SHORELINE
SERWM P
it
EX UNCLE TRAIL ROAD
(DWT ROAD)
Commissioner Tippin emphasized that his objection is strictly because of the
limitation on parking.
APRIL 6, 1999
0
-72-
s
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING --ORDINANCE 99-011- COUNTY
INITIATED REQUEST TO REZONE ±37 ACRES FROM
RS -1 TO CON -1 ffLINN TRACT) AND TO REZONE A
SEPARATE ±15.8 ACRES FROM RS -1 TO CON -1
(GREEN SALTMARM-(LEGISLATIVE)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating, AI
Community Developmedt Direeffir
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP 4C—;, Al.
Chie4 Long -Range Planning
FROM: John Wachtel *. �/)
Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 25,1999
RE: County Initiated Request to Rezone t37 Acres From RS -1 to Con -1; And to
Rezone a Separate f15.8 Acres From RS -1 to Con -1 (RZON 98-07-0252)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
This is a county initiated request involving two separate parcels, each of which contains
environmentally sensitive and important land now under some form of public ownership.
Attachments 2 and 3 show the location of the subject properties. Summarized in the table below,
this request involves rezoning both sites. The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary
zoning to reflect the subject properties' public ownership and to ensure that the subject properties'
environmental significance will be preserved.
APRIL 69 1999
-73-
BOOKFADE. C
SUBJECT PROPERTY 1
SUBJECT PROPERTY 2
KNOWN AS
Flinn Tract
Green Saltmarsh
LOCATION
Northeast corner of 8t6 Street and Indian River
West of St. Christophers Harbor
Boulevard
Subdivision
SIZE IN ACRES
37
15.8
LAND USE
M-2, Medium -Density Residential -2 (up to 10
C-2, Privately Owned Estuarine
DESIGNATION
unitstacre); and C-2, Privately Owned Estuarine
Wetlands Conservation -2 (up to 1
Wetlands Conservation -2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres)
umt/40 acres)
CURRENT
RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1
RS -1, Single -Family Residential
ZONING
unit(acre)
District (up to 1 unit(acre)
PROPOSED
Con -1, Public Lands Conservation District (zero
Con -1, Public Lands Conservation
ZONING
density)
District (zero density)
ACQUISITION
Purchased
Donated
METHOD
APRIL 69 1999
-73-
BOOKFADE. C
BOOK 103 [AGE `
When initiated, this application involved both a land use amendment and a rezoning request. As
with most such applications, both requests were processed concurrently. State law, however,
provides some special requirements for county initiated rezoning requests, such as the subject
request, that involve more than 10 acres. Among those special requirements are the following:
• The Board must hold 2 advertised public hearings; and
• The second hearing must be held at least 10 days after the first hearing and must be
advertised at least 5 days prior to the hearing.
The first rezoning public hearing was held at the March 16, 1999 Board of County Commissioners
meeting. At that meeting, the Board voted 5 to 0 to hold the second rezoning public hearing at the
April 6, 1999 Board of County Commissioners meeting. Because that meeting meets the
requirements for the second hearing, the rezoning ordinance can be adopted following that public
hearing.
On October 8,1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request.
- Subject Property 1
Located at the northeast comer of 8`h Street and Indian River Boulevard, Subject Property 1 consists
of ±21 acres of coastal oak hammock and *16 acres of estuarine wetlands. The coastal oak
hammock generally is located near Indian River Boulevard, while the estuarine wetlands generally
are located along the Indian River Lagoon. Adjacent properties to the north also contain coastal oak
hammock along Indian River Boulevard and estuarine wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon.
While all of Subject Property 1 is zoned RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 unit/acre),
only the eastern portions of adjacent properties to the north and south are zoned RS -1. The western
portions of those properties are zoned RM -10, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 10
units/acre).
Land abutting Subject Property 1 on the south contains the recently completed River Park Place
Multiple -Family development. West of Subject Property 1, across Indian River Boulevard, land is
zoned RM -10 and contains the Kyles Run Apartments.
Although zoned RS -1 in the County Zoning Atlas, environmentally important wetlands, such as
those along the Indian River Lagoon, are deemed to be zoned Con -2, wetland Conservation District
(up to 1 unitt40 acres).
- Subject Property 2
Located on the western edge of the south portion of the barrier island, just west of St. Christopher's
Harbor Subdivision, Subject Property 2 is nearly surrounded by the Indian River Lagoon. Zoned
RS -1 in the county zoning atlas, Subject Property 2 is undeveloped and consists entirely of
impounded estuarine wetlands. Nearby lands on the barrier island, to the east of Subject Property
2, are zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre), and consist of single-
family subdivisions and unplatted lots.
APRIL 69 1999
0 -74- 0
SUBJECT PROPERTY 1
SUBJECT PROPERTY 2
Indian River County: 54%
Not applicable
FUNDING
METHOD
Florida Inland Navigation District: 25%
St. Johns River Water Management District: 21%
Indian River Couniy: 50%
Indian River County: 100'/6
OWNERSHIP
Florida Inland Navigation District: 25%
St. Johns River Water Management District: 25%
When initiated, this application involved both a land use amendment and a rezoning request. As
with most such applications, both requests were processed concurrently. State law, however,
provides some special requirements for county initiated rezoning requests, such as the subject
request, that involve more than 10 acres. Among those special requirements are the following:
• The Board must hold 2 advertised public hearings; and
• The second hearing must be held at least 10 days after the first hearing and must be
advertised at least 5 days prior to the hearing.
The first rezoning public hearing was held at the March 16, 1999 Board of County Commissioners
meeting. At that meeting, the Board voted 5 to 0 to hold the second rezoning public hearing at the
April 6, 1999 Board of County Commissioners meeting. Because that meeting meets the
requirements for the second hearing, the rezoning ordinance can be adopted following that public
hearing.
On October 8,1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request.
- Subject Property 1
Located at the northeast comer of 8`h Street and Indian River Boulevard, Subject Property 1 consists
of ±21 acres of coastal oak hammock and *16 acres of estuarine wetlands. The coastal oak
hammock generally is located near Indian River Boulevard, while the estuarine wetlands generally
are located along the Indian River Lagoon. Adjacent properties to the north also contain coastal oak
hammock along Indian River Boulevard and estuarine wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon.
While all of Subject Property 1 is zoned RS -1, Single -Family Residential District (up to 1 unit/acre),
only the eastern portions of adjacent properties to the north and south are zoned RS -1. The western
portions of those properties are zoned RM -10, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 10
units/acre).
Land abutting Subject Property 1 on the south contains the recently completed River Park Place
Multiple -Family development. West of Subject Property 1, across Indian River Boulevard, land is
zoned RM -10 and contains the Kyles Run Apartments.
Although zoned RS -1 in the County Zoning Atlas, environmentally important wetlands, such as
those along the Indian River Lagoon, are deemed to be zoned Con -2, wetland Conservation District
(up to 1 unitt40 acres).
- Subject Property 2
Located on the western edge of the south portion of the barrier island, just west of St. Christopher's
Harbor Subdivision, Subject Property 2 is nearly surrounded by the Indian River Lagoon. Zoned
RS -1 in the county zoning atlas, Subject Property 2 is undeveloped and consists entirely of
impounded estuarine wetlands. Nearby lands on the barrier island, to the east of Subject Property
2, are zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre), and consist of single-
family subdivisions and unplatted lots.
APRIL 69 1999
0 -74- 0
s
On March 16,1999,the Board of County Commissioners adopted an ordinance redesignating the
subject properties to C-1. Consistent with state law, however, the effective date of that ordinance
is when the land use designation amendment is found "in compliance" by the State Department of
Community Affairs (DCA). According to state law, DCA must determine that the amendment is
either "in compliance" or "not in compliance" within 45 days from receipt of the amendment. DCA
has not yet formally made that determination. Therefore, at this time, the future land use patterns
in the area of the subject properties are as follows:
- Subject Property 1
With the exception of estuarine wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon, Subject Property 1 and all
surrounding properties are designated M-2, Medium -Density Residential -2, on the county's future
land use map. The M-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 10 units/acre.
The estuarine wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon are designated C-2, Estuarine Wetlands
Conservation -2. The C-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to lunit/40 acres on
site or off site density transfer credits of up to 1 unittacre.
- Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 is designated C-2 on the county's future land use map. Nearby lands on the
barrier island, to the east of Subject Property 2, are designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on
the county's future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to
3 units/acre.
- Subject Property 1
Providing habitat to several species of listed wading birds, Subject Property 1 consists of *21 acres
of coastal oak hammock and ±16 acres of wetlands (impounded estuarine salt marsh) associated with
the Indian River Lagoon. The subject property is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a
minimum base flood elevation requirement of six to seven feet NGVD.
- Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 consists of ±15.8 acres of impounded estuarine wetlands associated with the
Indian River Lagoon. Subject Property 2 also provides habitat for several species of listed wading
birds. Mangroves are the primary native vegetation on the site. The subject property is within an
"AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of five feet NGVD.
Utilities and Services
- Subject Property 1
Water lines extend to Subject Property 1 from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant, while
wastewater lines extend to the site from the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.
- Subject Property 2
Water lines extend to within a quarter mile of Subject Property 2 from the City of Vero Beach Water
Plant, while wastewater lines extend to within a quarter mile of the site from the City of Vero Beach
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
- Subject Property I
Subject Property 1 abuts Indian River Boulevard which is classified as an urban principal arterial
road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of Indian River Boulevard is a
four -lane paved road with approximately 150 feet of public road right-of-way. There are no plans
to expand Indian River Boulevard
- Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 cannot be accessed directly from an automobile. Island Drive, a private local
road, links the site to SR AIA. Classified as an urban minor arterial, that segment of SR AIA is a
two lane paved road with approximately 100 feet of public road right-of-way. That segment of SR
A 1 A is programmed for expansion to an urban principal arterial with 120 feet of public road right-
of-way by 2020.
APRIL 6, 1999
•
-75- BOOK U3 FAGE 833
I
BOOK 103 FAU'E E
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. Specifically,
this section will include the following:
• an analysis of the application's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the application's compatibility with surrounding areas;
• an analysis of the application's consistency with the comprehensive plan;
• an analysis of the application's potential impact on environmental quality; and
Both sites comprising this request are located within the County Urban Service Area, an area deemed
suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for.
Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation
(Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the
continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable
standards for these services and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new
development be reviewed. For rezoning requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional
concurrency determination application process.
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt
from concurrency requirements. For the subject request, t53 acres of RS -1 zoned land with a total
development potential of 53 units will be replaced with t53 acres of Con -1 zoned land. Since Con -1
zoned property has a zero density, the proposed rezoning will result in a decrease of 53 units in the
overall development potential of the subject properties. Because of that overall decrease in land use
intensity of 53 units, this rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review.
It is important to note that adoption of the proposed rezoning will not impact any public facilities
or services.
Under the requested Con -1 zoning district, there will be no development on the subject properties
except for minor facilities associated with passive recreation activities. For that reason, the subject
request will enhance compatibility between the sites and surrounding land uses.
In contrast to the 53 units allowed under the existing zoning, development under the requested
zoning will be limited to conservation uses and passive recreational uses. In terms of traffic, noise,
and aesthetics, the impacts associated with uses allowed under the proposed Con -1 zoning district
will be significantly less than those that would occur with development under the existing zoning
district. In fact, the passive recreational uses allowed under the requested zoning district will serve
as an amenity for nearby residential uses.
For these reasons, staff has determined that the proposed rezoning is compatible with the
surrounding areas.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions—including rezoning decisions. While all
comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more applicability than others
in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request is Future Land Use
Element Policy 1.6.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.6
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.5 limits the C-1 land use designation to publicly owned land with
conservation and/or recreational uses. Since the Con -1 zoning district is also limited to publicly
owned land with conservation and/or recreational uses, the Con -1 zoning district is consistent with,
and allowed on, C-1 designated land.
APRIL 69 1999
To ensure that the subject properties are not rezoned to Con -1 while they retain their present land
use designations (M-2 and C-2), the ordinance rezoning the subject properties has the same effective
date as the ordinance redesignating the sites to C-1. For that reason, the Con -1 zoning district cannot
be applied to the subject properties until the site is formally redesignated to C-1. For these reasons,
the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.6.
As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based upon
this analysis, staff determined that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The sites' existing zoning districts offer only limited environmental protections. Residential
development on the subject properties would be required to preserve only 15 percent of the upland
habitat of the sites. In contrast, under the proposed zoning district, the entire area of each site would
be preserved, and development would be limited to conservation and compatible passive recreational
uses.
Although the sites are publicly owned and could be developed as public parks under the existing
zoning districts, the proposed zoning district provides the sites with additional protection from
development. By prohibiting most types of development on the sites, the proposed rezoning will
ensure that the environmental quality of the sites will be preserved.
For these reasons, the proposed rezoning is anticipated to positively impact the environmental
quality of the subject properties.
Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the
comprehensive plan, compatible with all surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts
on the provision of public services. The request works to ensure the preservation of environmentally
sensitive and important habitat. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners rezone the subject properties to Con -1.
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the rezonings and discussed
the memorandum.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
adopted Ordinance 99-011 amending the Zoning
Ordinance and the Accompanying Zoning Map from
RS -1 to CON -1 for property located at the Northeast
comer of the Intersection of 8" Street and Indian
River Boulevard (Flinn Tract); and from RS -1 to
CON -1 for property located west of St.
Christopher's Harbor Subdivision (Green
Saltmarsh).
APRIL 6, 1999
-77- BOOK ij 3 FADE S do
L
_I
BOOK 103 i-,q,Gr 836
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 11
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RS -1 TO CON -1, FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 8TH
STREET AND INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD; AND FROM RS -1 TO CON -1, FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED WEST OF ST. CHRISTOPHER'S HARBOR SUBDMSION, AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
The South one-half of Government Lots 7 and 8, Section 7, Township 33 South, Range 40
East, Indian River County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT that parcel described in Official
Record Book 719, Page 76, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
0
Part of an island lying west of Government Lot 3 as described in Deed Book 82, Page 531
and Record Book 100, Page 198, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Together
with Part of an island lying west of Government Lot 4 as described in Deed Book 81, Page
583 and Record Book 100, Page 198, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
Be changed from RS -1 to Con -1.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective upon the issuance by the State Department
of Community Affairs of a Notice of Intent to find the related Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Designation Amendment contained in Ordinance Number 99-07 in compliance in accordance with
s. 163.3184(9) or the issuance of a final order by the Administration Commission finding the
referenced amendment in compliance with s. 163.3184(10).
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on
this 6" day of April, 1999.
APRIL 6, 1999
0
-78- 0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 11
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 24'h day of March, 1999 for a public
hearing to be held on the 60' day of April, 1999 at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner G inn , seconded by Commissioner T i p p i n , and
adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Vice -Chairman Fran B. Adams
-y e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge
_
_ Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN R CO
BY:
Kenneth TCMMaicht Chairman
ATTEST BY:_
e K. Barton, (�
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
u\v\j\lu\cij ul98\rzonord2.ord
APRIL 69 1999
-79-
•
BOaK I'L U 3 PAGE(s
_I
900K D8 MUE 83
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 99-012 - JOHN W.
MITCHELL AND OTHERS - REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRES FROM CH TO CL (QUASI-
JUDICIALI
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 24, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
r
o
iirfxlkeating, AiCP
Community Developme t Dkyr
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP S d.
Chien Long -Range Planning
FROM: John Wachteil�1/
Senior Planu r, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 24,1999
RE: JOHN W. MITCHELL AND OTHERS' REQUEST TO REZONE
APPRO30 MIATELY 2 ACRES FROM CH TO CL (RZON 99-01-0050)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
This is a request to rezone approximately 2 acres from the CH, Heavy Commercial, District to the
CL, Limited Commercial, District. The subject property is located at the northwest comer of US 1
and 77' Street The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary zoning to permit medical and
other offices, as well as some retail uses, on the site.
On February 25, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to CL.
The subject property contains a ten unit commercial building and is zoned CH. Adjacent land to the
north and west is zoned CH and is heavily wooded except for one single family house along the
north side of 7/h Street, adjacent to the subject property's western boundary. Land to the south and
east is zoned CL and also is heavily wooded.
The subject property and all surrounding properties are designated CA, Commercial/ Industrial, on
the future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning
districts.
APRIL 6, 1999
The subject property, a developed site, is not designated as environmentally important nor
environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. No wetlands or native upland plant
communities exist on the site. According to Flood InsuranceRating Maps, the subject property does
not contain any flood hazard areas.
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines extend to the site from the
North County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Wastewater collection lines from the North Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant run along Old Dixie Highway within a quarter mile of the site.
The site is bounded on the east by US 1. Classified as a rural principal arterial roadway on the future
roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of US 1 is a four lane road with approximately 120
feet of public mad right-of-way. Although the comprehensive plan indicates a need for up to 40
additional feet of right-of-way by the year 2020, there are no current plans to expand this portion of
US 1.
The site is bounded on the south by 77" Street. Classified as a rural major collector roadway on the
future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 77* Street is a two lane paved road with
approximately 50 feet of public road right-of-way. Although the comprehensive plan indicates a
need for an additional 30 to 50 feet of right-of-way by the year 2020, there are no current plans to
expand this portion of 77`" Street.
In teams of permitted uses, there are more differences than similarities between the existing CH
zoning district and the proposed CL district. The CL district is intended to provide for the small
scale retail, service, and professional office needs of the county while minimizing the impact of such
activities on any nearby residential areas. In contrast, the CH district is intended to serve the storage,
distribution, and heavy repair needs of the county. The differences between the districts are best
illustrated by their purpose statements found in the county's land development regulations. These
purpose statements are as follows:
• CL, Limited Commercial District The CL, Limited Commercial, district is intended to
provide areas for the development of restricted commercial activities. The CL district is
intended to accommodate the convenience retail and service needs of area residents, while
minimizing the impact of such activities on any nearby residential areas.
• CH, Heavy Commercial District. The CH, Heavy Commercial, district is intended to
provide areas for establishments engaging in wholesale trade, major repair services and
restricted light manufacturing activities. The CH district is further intended to provide
support services necessary for the development of commercial and industrial uses allowed
within other non-residential zoning districts.
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented The analysis
will include a description of -
0
f
• concurrency of public facilities;
• compatibility with the surrounding area;
• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for. Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The comprehensive
plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable
standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concunrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
APRIL 69 1999
-81- 1, 90 !r � 1
BOOK 10 P�1Gr.C� 1
F_
h r,
BOOK 1 Y fAGc
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be basad upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning district For commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the
county's land development regulations) is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor
area per acre of land proposed for rezoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis
is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned:
*2 acres
2. Land Use Designation:
C/1, Commercial/Industrial
3. Existing Zoning District:
CH, Heavy Commercial
4. Proposed Zoning District:
CL, Limited Commercial
5. Most Intense Use Under Existing Zoning District:
*20,000 sq. fL of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6'" Edition ITE Mannan.
6. Most Intense Use Under Proposed Zoning District:
*20,000 sq. fL of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 60 Edition ITE Mannan.
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from
concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the
requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site.
By changing the zoning of the subject property from CH to CL, some commercial uses not currently
allowed would be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of the property
would be the same with either zoning district, changing the property's zoning from CH to CL would
not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities.
In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with any new development
or changes of use on site. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand.
Located at the intersection of an arterial and a collector road, the subject property is surrounded by
commercial/industrial designated land. For that reason, compatibility is not a major concern
associated with this request The following four factors, however, suggest that the CL district may
be more appropriate than the CH district, for the subject property.
1) The existing uses on the site include retail sales, general office, and an animal clinic. Those
uses are permitted in the requested CL zoning district, but not the existing CH zoning
district.
2) The existing commercial building on the site, essentially a row of offices, would be best
utilized with medical and other professional services. Those uses are permitted in the
requested CL zoning district, but not the existing CH zoning district
3) With the exception of the *9 acre CH district which includes the 4 acre subject property,
the existing zoning pattern in this area of the county, especially east of Old Dixie Highway,
is dominated by the CL district Therefore, the request is for a continuation of an existing
zoning pattern.
4) The site is adjacent to a single-family house. Compared to the CH district, the CL district
is structured to be more compatible with residential uses.
For these reasons, development of the subject property under the requested CL district would be
compatible with surrounding areas.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezomngs must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
APRIL 69 1999
—s2-
0
The goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are Future Land Use Element Policies 1.15 and 1.16.
• Future Land Use Element Policies 1.15 and 1.16
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.16 states that the commerciaUmdustrial land use designation shall
permit uses that include retail trade, office uses, business and personal services, and other similar
uses. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that all commercial/industrial uses
must be located within the county's urban service area
Since the subject property is located within the county's urban service area, and the requested CL
district is intended for uses permitted within the commercial/industrial land use designation, the
request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policies 1.15 and 1.16.
While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan
policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for
consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the
request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Environmental protection regulations are the same for both the CH and the CL zoning districts.
Because the subject property is not environmentally significant nor environmentally important,
development of the site will not impact significant natural resources.
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, and is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezoning the site, as requested, will have no
negative impacts on environmental quality or the provision of public facilities and services. The
subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for office and some retail uses. The request
meets all applicable criteria. For those reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from CH to CL.
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the project.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Wayne Kroegel, questioned whether the holding ponds will be expanded, and
Director Keating responded that no changes are planned; this is just a rezoning. Any
proposed changes would have to be brought before the Board and Mr. Kroegel would be
notified.
APRIL 611999
-83-BOOK �� PAGE 1
BOOK IM f'AGE o
Mr. Kroegel then questioned whether the future land use was being changed and
whether this would impact his property taxes.
Attorney Michael O'Haire, representing the applicant, stated that there are no plans
for any construction and the applicant does not anticipate any changes. This rezoning should
not affect Mr. Kroegel's taxes.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously adopted Ordinance 99-012 amending
the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning
Map from CH to CL for property located at the
northwest corner of 771 Street (Hobart Road) and
US 1(Mitchell, et al).
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 12
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CH TO CL, FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 77TH STREET (HOBART ROAD)
AND US 1, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
APRIL 69 1999
0
-84-
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 12
The south 421.47 feet of that portion of the east '/: of the west %: of Government Lot 5,
Section 34, Township 31 east, Range 39 south, lying west of U.S. Highway #1, lying and
being in Indian River County, Florida
Be changed from CH to CL.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on
this 6" day of April, 1999.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 24`h day of March, 1999 for a public
hearing to be held on the 6`h day of April, 1999 at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Ti p p i n , seconded by Commissioner Adams
and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Vice -Chairman Fran B. Adams A vA
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A v e
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin a y a
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN R COUNTY
BY:,4,-
k
Kenneth R. Macht, Chauman
ATTEST BY:
b P Jeffrey K_. icz
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
u\v\j\rz\mitch\rzonord.ord
APRIL 69 1999
Indo Aha Ca Aevrueo ate
Admin
Legal
Budget
Deot z „
Aiek Mgr.
-85- f,
BOOK Ft1GE
BOOK 103 mu -t-894
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - DOWNDRIFT COALITION
BOB BRUCE AND BILL GIAM - ENDANGERED SPECIES
ACT, SECTION TEN ACTION AGAINST THE SEBASTIAN
INLET TAX DISTRICT AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
The Board reviewed a letter of March 16, 1999:
Downdrift Coalition, Inc.
12396 North Al
Vero Beach, Florida 32963
(561) 589.7996 (voice & fax)
March 16, 1999
Honorable Ken Macht, Chairman (SENT BY FAX: 561 770-5334)
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1825 251h Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Chairman Macht,
Please place the following item on the agenda under Public Discussion for the next
meeting of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners.
Please list the item this way:
Bob Bruce & Bill Glynn, representing the Downdrift Coalition, Inc.; to discuss
extending an offer to Indian River County to join the Downdrift Coalition in an
Endangered Species Act, Section Ten Action against the Sebastian Inlet Tax
District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (See letter dated
March 15, 1999 for details).
Sincerely,
Downdrift Coalition, Inc.
8odr8r"Cw
Bob Bruce, President
cc: Indian River County Commission
Charles Vitunac, Indian River County Attorney
Jim Davis, Director of Public Works
Jeff Tabor, County Coastal Engineer
APRIL 69 1999
C
Bill Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, believed this is the "best of times and worst of
times". The Beach Protection Plan has been approved and he is very happy with Jeff Tabar,
the coastal engineer. However, the Archie Carr turtle habitat is gone and sand has been
scoured from Indian River County beaches by the Sebastian Inlet Taxing District. He felt that
the 200 feet of rock owned by the State of Florida is the largest coastal armoring in the State
of Florida and constitutes a major "taking" of endangered species habitat. The Downdrift
Coalition is planning to file a notice of intent to bring suit against the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection and the Sebastian Inlet Taxing District.
Bob Bruce, 12396 North AIA, lives within the Archie Carr Wildlife Refuge. He is
a scientist and engineer and noted that loggerhead turtle nests have had a rate increase over
the last 10 years north of the Inlet, while south of the Inlet is chaos. There is scientific data
to show that the Inlet is affecting the turtle nesting habitat, as well as affecting the habitat
of the southeastern beach mouse. The Sebastian Inlet Taxing District consultants have
developed this data themselves. He and Mr. Glynn are asking the County to join with the
Downdrift Coalition and the Caribbean Conservation Corporation in filing a 60 day notice
in the hope that this will bring all affected parties to the table.
Mr. Glynn continued that notice will be filed for the taking of habitat of the
southeastern beach mouse and marine turtles and, while he and Mr. Bruce represent about
1,000 people, the Board represents the whole County and the County needs a voice in these
negotiations.
Commissioner Adams believed the County has the same goals, but is not traveling the
same roads to get there. She noted that since the November election a different rapport has
been established with many state departments and they realize the effect the Inlet is having
and have indicated their support to bring forward a study of a sand transfer plan. The
opportunity is there to look at the situation in a new light and she preferred to pursue avenues
other than a lawsuit first. A sand transfer station will serve both the issue of restoring the
beaches and restoring the endangered species habitat.
Commissioner Stanbridge agreed a sand transfer facility should be examined and
believed that the Habitat Conservation Plan will also serve to assist in reaching these goals.
•
APRIL 6, 1999
-87- � ,�
BOOK 3 Pw{GUrflJ5
L
BOOK 108 FADE 890
Commissioner Adams expressed the Board's appreciation for the efforts of Mr.
Glynn, Mr. Bruce and their associations.
Commissioner Tippin emphasized that he still believes in miracles and felt there has
been an attitude change in government in the last few months. He felt joining in a lawsuit
would not be the best strategy.
NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED OR TARN.
11.A.1. LDR AMENDMENTS - PUBLIC HEARINGS
SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19 AND MAY 4, 1999
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 23, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator DATE: March 23, 1999
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
hart M. Keating, . P
Community Development r
FROM: Stan Boling, P
Planning Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Dates for Two Board Hearings to Consider LDR Amendments
Itis requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
Several LDR amendment proposals have been initiated over the last several months that must now
be considered by the Board. Because some of the amendments would affect the listed uses allowed
in certain zoning districts, two public hearings are required.
To minimize the number of required hearings, staff limits the number of times the LDRs are
amended. This has been done by holding proposed LDR amendments until a sufficient number of
amendments exists to process and consider at one time.
This set of proposed LDR amendments relates to several issues, including the following:
I • Murphy Deed Reservations
2. Right -of -Way Table
3. Building - Front Walkway Vendors
4. Distinguishing piers from Docks
S. Height of Buildings with Multiple Roof Structures & Limits on Height of Roof Peaks
6. Half -Streets
7. Gated Entrances
S. Exception to Littoral Zone Requirements
9. Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements Update
10. Prohibition of Special Needs Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas
11. Home Occupations
12. Private Access Road Frontage
APRIL 69 1999
0 86 •
The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) and the Professional Services Advisory Committee
(PSAC) have reviewed or are scheduled to review each proposed amendment. To proceed with the
review and approval process for the amendments, the Board must now set dates and times for its
required public hearings.
Planning staff has coordinated with the county attorney's office concerning state requirements for
LDR amendment hearings. State requirements divide LDR amendments into two types:
1. Amendments which change the actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within
a zoning category (district), and
2. All other types of amendments.
One of the proposed amendments would change the list of uses allowed in certain zoning districts.
That amendment requites two hearings. Florida statutes provides that one hearing be held after 5:00
p.m., while the other hearing may be held before 5:00 p.m. (e.g. regular Board meeting time).
However, the statutes also state that, with 4 or 5 positive votes, the Board could vote to hold both
LDR hearings bohm 5:00 p.m., such as at a regular Tuesday morning Board meeting.
Even though only one of the 12 proposed LDR amendments requires two hearings, it is staffs
opinion that all of the LDR amendments should be considered at two hearings. It is also staffs
opinion that the first hearing should be held after 5:00 p.m. to better accommodate public input, and
that the second hearing, which is generally shorter and more of a "wrap-up" meeting, should be held
during a regular Tuesday morning Board meeting.
One set of hearing dates which would comply with state hearing and advertising requirements and
would allow for two hearings for all proposed amendments is as follows:
Hearing D= Time
Meeting #1 Special meeting Monday, April 19,1999 5:01 p.m.
Meeting #2 Regular meeting Tuesday, May 4,1999 9:05 a.m
Staff has tentatively reserved use of the Commission Chambers for these proposed dates. The Board
may establish any other dates that meet state requirements and during which the Chambers may be
used
Staff recommends that the Board concur with the proposed hearing dates or set other hearing dates
to consider the proposed LDR amendments.
APRIL 69 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Grin, the Board
,unanimously set LDR Meeting #1 for Monday, April
195, 1999 at 5:01 p.m. and LDR Meeting #2 for
Tuesday, May 4,1999 at 9:05 a.m., as recommended
by staff.
-89-
•
BOOK 103
I
BOOK iM i-,ua 89, 8
11.A.2. POT BELLIED PIGS - CONSIDERATION OF CODE
ENFORCEMENT BOARD ACTION (CAUSEY AND LEWIS
�
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 2521999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICPaAK
Community Development Director
DATE: March 25, 1999
SUBJECT: Consideration of Code Enforcement Board Action
On Pot Bellied Pigs
It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDPTIONS:
• Background
In May, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners amended the County's Land Development
Regulations (LDRs) to designate pot-bellied pigs as livestock. This LDR change overruled staffs
previous interpretation that pot-bellied pigs were household pets.
The referenced LDR change was initiated for two principal reasons. First, residents in several
neighborhoods had complained about pot-bellied pigs being kept as pets. Second, the Humane
Society and the County's Animal Control Office had experienced a number of instances of people
abandoning their pot-bellied pigs when the pigs grew too big.
As a result of the LDR change, pot-bellied pigs are not allowed to be kept in residential areas.
Instead, they are limited to agricultural areas.
Subsequent to the May LDR change, staff initiated enforcement of the new pot-bellied pig
restrictions. In so doing, staff made an interpretation that the grandfathering principle applied to pot-
bellied pigs. As such, staff interpreted pot-bellied pigs being kept as household pets in residential
areas as existing non -conformities. with that interpretation, residential pigs existing at the time of
the LDR change could remain, although new pigs could not be established in residential area and
pigs that die could not be replaced.
Because staffs grandfathering interpretation had the effect of legalizing pigs existing at the time of
the LDR change, staff did not pursue the removal of pot-bellied pigs that were the subject of several
neighborhood complaints. Consequently, several residents requested that the Board of County
Commoners overturn staff s interpretation that the grandfathering principle applies to pot-bellied
pigs.
At its September 8, 1998 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners considered and overturned
staff s interpretation that pot-bellied pigs existing at the time of the May 1998 LDR change may be
grandfathered. In taking this action, the Board directed staff not to be proactive in enforcing the pot-
bellied pig prohibition, but instead limit enforcement to cases involving citizen complaints.
In the past year, code enforcement staff has received ten complaints regarding pot-bellied pigs. One
of those cases, the Heidi Lewis case, was the case cited by several neighboring residents who
requested that the Board overturn staffs pot-bellied pig grandfather interpretation.
APRIL 6, 1999
-9a
•
in addition to the official pot-bellied pig complaints referenced above, staff has received a number of
inquiries from county residents regarding pot-bellied pig regulations and enforcement procedures.
Based upon those contacts, it is reasonable to believe that some residents having pot-bellied pigs have
removed the pigs to comply with County regulations without having been formally cited through code
enforcement.
With respect to the pot-bellied pig code enforcement cases, several different actions have occurred,
and one case is scheduled for an evidentiary hearing at the next Code Enforcement Board meeting.
In the Heidi Lewis case, the Code Enforcement Board held an evidendary hearing and issued an order
that her pigs be removed Prior to a compliance hearing before the Code Enforcement Board where
a fine would have been imposed, Ms. Lewis voluntarily complied and removed the pigs. Several
other cases were also resolved by the respondent removing his pot-bellied pigs before fines were
assessed. At its meeting ofMarch 22, 1999, the Code Enforcement Board considered the Amimarie
Causey rase.
=47=77111:
Like the Heidi Lewis case, the Amimarie Causey case involved pot-bellied pigs being kept in a
residential zoning district. Also like the Lewis case, the Causey case involved pigs that had been
acquired prior to the May LDR amendment which prohibited pot-bellied pigs being kept as household
pets in residentially zoned areas. At its March meeting, the Code Enforcement Board conducted an
evidentiary hearing on the Causey case.
Despite evidence presented by staff that pot-bellied pigs were being kept in a residentially zoned area
in violation ofthe County's LDWs and despite the respondent's testimony that pigs were being kept
at the residence, the Code Enforcement Board found, by a four to three vote, that no code violation
existed. In making its decision, the Code Enforcement Board majority indicated that they did not
agree with the County's land development regulations on pot-bellied pigs. They indicated that they
thought it was unfair to require removal of pot-bellied pigs acquired prior to the May amendment of
the LDR's. And they opined that they felt that they (as the Code Enforcement Board) had made the
wrong decision in ordering that Heidi Lewis remove her pigs.
In finding that no violation existed in the Causey case, the Code Enforcement Board made a policy
or legislative decision, instead of a quasi-judicial decision.
•,� l..• 71,711 _:•._� ���7n..��-
Indian River County established its Code Enforcement Board in 1982. Its creation is codified in
Section 103.03 4. of the Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances. As indicated in that
code section, the Code Enforcement Board is constituted and has the powers and responsibilities as
set forth in Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
Chapter 162, Florida Statutes, provides the enabling authority for local governments to establish
Code Enforcement Boards which have "the authority to hold hearings and assess fines against
violators of the respective county or municipal codes and ordinances." That chapter goes on to state
that "an aggrieved party, including the local governing body, may appeal a final administrative order
of an enforcement board to the circuit court." Finally, Chapter 162 states that "the local governing
body attorney shall either be counsel to an enforcement board or shall represent the municipality or
county in no case shall the local governing body attorney serve in both capacities."
By deciding in the Causey case that keeping pot-bellied pigs did not constitute a code violation, the
Code Enforcement Board exceeded its designated authority under Chapter 162, Florida Statutes.
According to Chapter 162, the Code Enforcement Board has the authority to enforce existing
adopted regulations, not to establish, amend, modify, or change codes or regulations. Those are
legislative functions which only the Board of County Commissioners can undertake.
Since Chapter 162, Florida Statutes, provides that appeals of Code Enforcement Board decisions go
to circuit court, the Board of County Commissioners does not have the authority to overturn the
Code Enforcement Board's decision. In fact, state statutes provide that the Board of County
Commissioners insist adhere to the same procedures as any other aggrieved party in appealing a Code
Enforcement Board decision.
Ifthe Board of County Commissioners does opt to appeal the Code Enforcement Board's decision
to circuit covet, the Board of County Commissioners cannot use the County Attorney's office as its
legal counsel. Since the County Attorney's office represents the Code Enforcement Board and since
Chapter 162, Florida Statutes, prohibits a local government's attorney from representing both the
Code Enforcement Board and the local government, the Board of County Commissioners would need
to retain an outside attorney in an appeal of the Code Enforcement Board's decision. In fact, the
County Attorney's office, as the Code Enforcement Board's counsel, would oppose the Board of
County Commissioners in such a proceeding.
APRIL 6,1999
-91- �;,�
BOOK ' 3 F��4 X99
BOOK 103 FAGS �G- 3
The Code Enforcement Board's action raises two important issues that affect implementation of the
County's regulations. These issues are as follows:
• Should the Code Enforcement Board legislate?
By deciding which codes, ordinances and regulations to enforce, the Code
Enforcement Board essentially assumes a legislative or law making role. That is a
function limited to the Board of County Commissioners, and a function that may not
be delegated by the Board of County Commissioners.
As the elected representatives of the residents of the County, the Board of County
Commissioners adopted legislation to prohibit pot-bellied pigs from being kept in
residentially zoned areas. The Board of County Commissioners also specifically voted
not to grandfather in pot-bellied pigs existing in residentially zoned areas prior to
adoption of the pig prohibition. By deciding that keeping pigs in residential areas
does not constitute a code violation, the Code Enforcement Board effectively
legislated away the Board of County Commissioners' adopted pot-bellied pig
prohibition.
According to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes, the Code Enforcement Board does not
have the authority to take the action which it did. If the Code Enforcement Board
thought that the pot-bellied pig prohibition regulation was unfair, the appropriate
action would have been for the Code Enforcement Board to have given the subject
respondent a period of tune to comply with the regulation and to formally request that
the Board of County Commissioners reconsider its regulation prior to the
respondent's compliance date.
• How should staff enforce pot-bellied pig regulations?
As described herein, staffbas enforced the pot-bellied pig regulations adopted by the
Board of County Commissioners. In enforcing those regulations, however, staff
depends upon the Code Enforcement Board to issue orders and impose fines upon
those respondents who fail to comply with the regulations. With respect to the pot-
bellied pig regulation, the Code Enforcement Board has refused to enforce, and
therefore has effectively overturned, the Board of County Commissioners' legislative
decision not to grandfather pot-bellied pigs.
Consequently, staff needs direction as to how to enforce the pot-bellied pig
prohibition. Since the Code Enforcement Board has decided not to enforce the
regulation, it seems that, without action by the Board of County Commissioners,
future POt-bellied pig code enforcement mses will also be dismissed by the Code
Enforce Board. The choice then is for staff to ignore pot-bellied pig complaints
since the Cade Enforcement Board will not enforce the pig prohibition, or for the
Board of County Commissioners to appeal the Code Enforcement Board's pot-bellied
M decision to circ= court, requesting that the court compel the Code Enforcement
Board to enforce the pig prohibition.
Alternatively, the Board of County Commissioners could bypass the Code
Enforcement Board on future pot-bellied pig cases. This would involve seeking an
injunction through the circuit court, based upon Section 100.05 2. of the County's
Code oflaws and Ordinarnces. That section deems any violation ofthe code a public
nuisance and provides for abatement of the violation through injunctive relief.
The Board of County Commissioners' alternatives in this case involve either tatting action or not
taking action. In not taking action, the Board of County Commissioners would allow the Code
Enforcement Board to legislate the pot-bellied pig issue as well as any other issue with which the
Code Enforcement Board disagrees. By taking action, the Board of County Commissioners could
compel the code Enforcement Board to enforce legally adopted county regulations.
Specifically, the Board of County Commissioners' two alternatives are:
APRIL 6, 1999
0
-92- •
allow Heidi Lewis, the respondent whose case created neighborhood concerns, to re-establish her
pigs.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners consider the information presented
herein, consider the county attorney's input, and make a decision regarding its preferred pot-bellied
pig alternative.
• To appear! the Code Enforcement Board's Causey decision.
Appealing the Code Enforcement Board's decision will involve hiring outside legal counsel
and filing a lawsuit in circuit court. According to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes, any such
appy must be filed within 30 days from the date of issuance of the Code Enforcement
Board's order. Although the Code Enforcement Board adopted its order on March 22, 1999,
the order has not yet been formally issued. Issuance will occur soon.
The cost of appealing the Code Enforcement Board's order could range from $3,000 to
$5,000 for outside legal counsel for the Board of County Commissioners. The Code
Enforcement Board would be represented by the County Attorney's office.
Because of the time limitation to appeal a Code Enforcement Board order, the Board of
County Commoners must act immediately if it intends to appeal. This will allow time to
choose and contract with an outside attorney and time for that attorney to prepare the
complaint.
• Not to appeal the Cade Enforcement Board's Causey decision
The Board of County Commissioners can choose not to appeal the Code Enforcement
Board's Causey decision That, however, would leave the Board of County Commissioners'
pot-belfied pig prohibition, or at least the non -grandfathering provision of that regulation,
unclear. Because enforcement would be futile given the Code Enforcement Board's past
action and stated position, code enforcement staff would not pursue enforcement of pot-
bellied pig violations where the pig existed prior to the May LDR change.
If the Board of County Commissioners opts for this alternative, the Board of County
Commissioners should formally rescind its decision not to grandfather pot-bellied pigs kept
in residential areas prior to its May IDR amendment. Such action would clarify the
regulation and provide specific direction to code enforcement staff
The Board of County Commissioners can choose either alternative. With alternative 1, the Board can
reconfirm and defend its September non -grandfathering position with alternative 2, the Board will
avoid a lawsuit, but must reverse its September non-grandf tthering decision Such action will also
CountyAttorney Vitunac noted that the County Attomeys' Office represents the Code
Enforcement Board as well as the Board of County Commissioners. He recommended filing
a motion for rehearing as no one would benefit from having 2 County agencies suing each
other. He also recommended that the owners of the pigs be invited to meet with Planning
& Zoning and look at the issues again, particularly the "grandfathering" issue. Perhaps a
way can be found for the pig owners and the County to agree.
APRIL 6, 1999
-93BOOK '103 �mA-ji
-
BOOK M3 FAGE
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the County Attorney's
recommendation that the pig owners meet with
County staff and that a motion for rehearing be filed.
11.C. PURCHASING POLICY
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 1999:
Date: March 29,1999
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director t)
Subject: Purchasing Policy
BACKGROUND:
Recently, a question arose regarding an interpretation of the Purchasing Manual as it relates to
purchases from State and governmental contracts and the need to acquire Board approval for
such purchases over $5,000. As a matter of practice, budgeted purchases off a State contract or
other governmental contracts have been processed through the Purchasing Division without any
further approval by the Board regardless of the $5,000 bid and award cap.
ANALYSIS:
This was done predicated on Section 3.8 of the Purchasing Manual, which indicated that the
process as identified in Section 2.0.29 was not required for purchases over $5,000 bought on
State or governmental contracts. Section 2.0.29 is the definition of the term Formal Bid" and
defines it as "the process through which purchases exceeding ,$5,000.00 are advertised to
encourage maximum vendor participation and awards for such purchases can only be mode
by Board of County Commissioners."
This interpretation has been used since November 20, 1990, the adoption of the Purchasing
Manual. Additionally, purchasing staff have indicated that this interpretation has been pointed
out and reviewed by auditors without criticism.
Another opinion is that the reference back to Section 2.0.29 from Section 3.8 of the Purchasing
Manual only negates the necessity of the formal bid and not the necessity for approval by the
Board of County Commissioners.
Inasmuch as this interpretation has been used for eight years without problem, it would be
reasonable to assume that a continued interpretation would be appropriate. As a matter of
information, staff is currently reviewing the Purchasing Manual for recommended changes since
the document is eight years old. At the time that the manual is brought forward for approval of
any revisions, the language could be clarified at that time.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would request theBoard's confirmation of the current interpretation as a matter of
operational policy, i.e., budget approved goods and services purchased via a State contract or
other governmental contract would not require further approval of the Board of County
Commissioners.
APRIL 6, 1999
. -94-
•
•
County Administrator James Chandler stated that the policy is that these purchases
are "piggybacked" off State contracts and when that option is not available, contracts are
presented to the Board following regular procedures.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously confirmed the current
interpretation as a matter of operational policy, i.e.,
budget approved goods and services purchased via a
State or other governmental contract would not
require further approval of the Board of County
Commissioners, as recommended by staff.
11.G.1. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 58TH AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS - OSLO ROAD TO 267H STREET - PARCEL NO.
117, ABRAHAM & CHARLOTTE BARKETT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 23, 1999:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director11
Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manage
FROM: William M. Napier, SRPA, SRA
Right -of --Way Agent A//r�
SUBJECT: Right -0f --Way Acquisition/County Project No. 8823
58 Avenue Improvements/Oslo Road to 26* Street
Parcel No. 117, Abraham and Charlotte Barkett
DATE: March 23, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Additional right -of way of fifty-sbc feet (56') along the west side of 581i Avenue, and fifty feet
(50') along the north side of 121' Street, is needed in conjunction with the 581" Avenue
Improvements Project The property owners have executed a contract at a purchase price
of $20,000.00 per acre for the A-1 zoned land. This price per acre is a negotiated price
based upon two appraisals on the property, and is within the range of prices of other
similar A-1 parcels the County has acquired within the market area.
The total contract price is $114,434.86 which includes Land at $46,400 (2.32 acres
$20,000), Attorney Fees of $6,920.75 due Sellers' attorney Michael O'Haire, Appraisal
Fees of $4,100.00 for an appraisal requested by Mr. O'Haire, and $57,014.11 for citrus
trees to be removed, loss of income from citrus trees, severance damages due to loss of
a buildable site based upon the decrease in land area, and construction costs to
compensate for replacing the grove service road, drainage ditch, and irrigation system.
APRIL 69 1999
-95-
BOOK D 3 FAIGE
•
I
n
BOOK 103 ° PAGE ;J
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the $114,434.86
purchase, and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract.
Funding will be from Account #315-214-541-066.12.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the contract with
Abraham BarkeM Jr. and Charlotte Barkett in the
amount of $114,434.86 and authorized the Chairman
to execute same, as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE WITH THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.2. CITY OF VERO BEACH/INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 22, 1999:
aaaaamaana
maaaamaamaamaaaaaaaamaaaoaaaaamanan
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
TBRU: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Christopher R. Mora, P.E.
County Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to
City of Vero Beach / Indian River County
Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement
DATE: March 22, 1999
aaaaaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaaaanaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanammaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Under an interlocal agreement executed in 1992, the County operates
and maintains twenty-nine (29) of the thirty-six (36) traffic
signals within the City of Vero Beach. The City has now requested
that the remaining seven traffic signals be formally added to the
maintenance agreement. These seven traffic signals were not
included within the original agreement because:
1. They were built and activated after 1992, or
2. They were not part of the original Closed Loop computerized
traffic signal system.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
For purposes of operation, maintenance, and coordination, the
County has found it advantageous that all traffic signals within
the County remain under the jurisdiction of a single agency. The
alternatives are as follows:
APRIL 69 1999
Ka
0
Alternative No. 1
Approve the agreement amendment and authorize the BCC Chairman's
signature.
Alternative No. 2
Deny approval of the agreement amendment and cancel the project.
REC0WMM TIONS AND YMMING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 - approval of the agreement
amendment. Since the City of Vero Beach reimburses the County for
all labor and material costs associated with traffic signal
maintenance, there is no funding impact generated by this project.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED
by Commissioner
Grin, the
Board
unanimously
approved the
Traffic
Signal
Maintenance Agreement with the City of Vero
Beach and authorized the Chairman to execute same,
as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.3. RESOLUTION 99-034 - AS -BUILT RESOLUTION AND
ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER
CLUB IN SEBASTIAN (ROSELAND GARDENS SUBDIVISION)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 1999:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
and '
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E�
County Engineer
FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CET
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: As -Built Resolution & Assessment Roll for Paving and Drainage Improvements to
Airport Drive adjacent to Collier Club in Sebastian, Florida in Roseland Gardens
Subdivision
DATE: March 29, 1999
The Public Works Department and the Developer for Collier Club initiated a public improvement
assessment for Airport Drive in Sebastian, Florida The property owners to be assessed reside in
Roseland Gardens Subdivision which is a private subdivision located within Indian River County.
On November 10, 1998 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 98-126
providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to Airport Drive adjacent to Collier Club in
Sebastian, Florida in Roseland Gardens Subdivision. On December 1, 1998 a Public Hearing was
held.
APRIL 69 1999
-97-
boa MJ Fnu-L 935
BOOK iOJ' FACE 9JG
The paving of the above mentioned road has been completed. The final assessment is as follows:
Preliminary Estimates
Final Cost
$ 19,881.92 - 5001a Paid by Developer
$19351.12 - 50'/o Paid by Developer
$ 20,876.92 - 50%* Paid by Property Owners
$ 20,519.93 - 50'/o* Paid by Property Owners
1,427.97 Front Footage
,427.97 Front Footage
$ 14.62 /per FF +S'14.37
/per FF
' This figure includes Collection'. Administrative Costs, Recording Fees See Final Costs
The final assessment roll has been prepared and is ready to be delivered to the Clerk to the Board.
Assessments are to be paid within 90 days or in 2 equal installments, the first to be made twelve
months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date at an interest
rate of 73/% established by the Board of County Commissioners.
ALItRNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Since the final assessment to the benefitted owners is less than the preliminary assessment roll, the
only alternative presented is to approve the final assessment rolls.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the final assessment roll and the "As -Built Resolution" for the paving of the
above mentioned roads be approved by the Board of County Commissioners and that it be transferred
to the Utilities Department for collection.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 99-034 certifying
"as -built" costs for certain paving and drainage
improvements to Airport Drive adjacent to Collier
Club in Sebastian, Florida in Roseland Gardens
Subdivision, designated as Project No. 9811.
APRIL 69 1999
An -Built (Fourth Reso.) 3/25/97(ENG)RES4.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 99-34
A. RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CERTIFYING
"AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO Airport Drive adjacent to Collier
Club in Sebastian, Florida in Roseland Gardens
Subdivision. DESIGNATED AS PROJECT NO. 9811, AND
OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT;
PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR
PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County determined that the improvements described herein
specially benefited the property located within the boundaries as
described in this title, designated as Project No. 9811, are in
the public interest and promote the public welfare of the county;
and
WHEREAS, on December 1, 1998, the Board held a public
hearing in the Commission Chambers at which time the owners of
the property to be assessed were afforded an opportunity to
appear before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and
advisability of making such improvements; and
WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County
Commission adopted Resolution No. 98-134, which confirmed the
special,'I#ssessment cost of the project to the property specially
benefited -by the project in the amounts listed in an attachment
to that resolution; and
APRIL 6, 1999
-99- BOOK 103 MAP.
BOOK 103 PAGE 6 a�
wHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has certified the
actual "as -built" cost now that the project has been completed is
$14.37 per front foot, which is less than $14.62 per front foot
in the confirming Resolution No. 98-134,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Resolution No. 98-134 is modified as follows: The
completion date for Project No. 9811 is declared to be March 4,
1999, and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest
and penalty charges is ninety (90) days after passage of this
resolution.
2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 7�% per
annum may be made in two equal installments, the first to be made
twelve (12) months from the
due date and the subsequent payments to be due yearly from the
due date. The due date is the date of passage of this
resolution.
3. The assessment roll for said project listed in
Resolution No. 98-138 shall be as set forth in attached Exhibit
"A" to this resolution.
4. The assessments as shown in attached Exhibit "A" shall
stand confirmed and remain legal, valid, and binding first liens
against the property against which such assessments are made
until paid.
5. The assessments shown in Exhibit "A", attached to
Resolution No.98-138 were recorded by the County on the public
records of Indian River County, and the lien shall constitute
prima facie evidence of its validity.
This resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Adams , and the motion was seconded by
Commissi6ner Ginn - and, upon being put
to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Vice -Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner., John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stan')Dridge Aye
APRIL 69 1999
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this 6 day of ApriI ,
1998.
BOARD 0 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF I ANZRLINTY, FLORIDA
Byhairmacht
. � Chairman
Attest.
JEFFREY K. BARTON,
�C ark
Atta ant: Exhibi "A"
asbuilt.res
2
0
FINAL COST FOR:
AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN, FL
DATE: March 4,1999
PROJECT NO. 9811
TOTAL F.F.
1,427.97
TOTAL LF.
1,484.00
FINAL COST
CONSTRUCTION
(fig
$7,791.00
Coquina
513,152.21
Asphalt
$7,576.65
Driveway Restoration
5567.20
Sod
S131.19
Clearing
53.23444
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS:
S32,452.25
S32,452.25
PERS
S350.00
ROW ACQUISITION &
TITLE SEARCH FRES
N/A
N/A
EN004EERING & SURVEYING
TOTAL
5,240..04
538,702.25
y.
WA Developer Assessment
'
$19,351.12
50% Property Owner's Assessment
S19,351.13
Recording Fees
$200.00
Collection Fee 2.006446%
5388.27
Administration Fee 3%
5580.53
TOTAL ASSESSMENT
$20.319.93
SSESSMENT S20S19.93 = S14.3
1,427.97 FF
APRIL 69 1999
-101- BOOK 103- FADE
f
�a
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN,
FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT
C3 TOTAL FRONT FEET ................................... 1,427.97
CD COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $20,519.93
PROJECT NO. 9811 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............................. $14.37
9811 FIN2.WK4
1,427.97 $14.37 20,519.93 20,519.91
TOTAL FRONT COST PER F.F. TOTAL COST TOTAL ASSESSMEA
FOOTAGE
I'AH I
11
E f 03
U
ON
GN
ON
rl
I-
•
r
N
O
•
FRONT
ASSESSMENT
NAME & ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOOTAGE
COST/F.F.
TOTAL COST
COST
13. Herbert & Kathleen Severance
11-31-38-00003-0030-00003.0
120
$14.37
$1,724.40
$1,724.40
3556 Lucia Drive
Roseland Gardens SID, PBI 8-25, E 12 Lot 3 and all
Vero Beach, FL 32967
Lot 4, Block 3
14. Herbert& Kathleen Severance
11-31-38-00003-0030-00005.0
120
$14.37
$1,724.40
$1,724.40
3556 Lucia Drive
Roseland Gardens S/D, PBI 8-25, Lot 5 & NW 12
Vero Beach, FL 32967
of Lot 6, Block 3
15. Frieda Ross
11-31-38-00003-0030-00006.0
125
$14.37
$1,796.25
$1,796.25
11107 Airport Drive
Roseland Gardens SID, PBI 8-25, SEly 12 of Lot 6
Sebastian, FL 32958
& all of Lot 7, Block 3
9811 FIN2.WK4
1,427.97 $14.37 20,519.93 20,519.91
TOTAL FRONT COST PER F.F. TOTAL COST TOTAL ASSESSMEA
FOOTAGE
I'AH I
11
E f 03
U
ON
GN
ON
rl
I-
•
r
N
O
•
•
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN,
FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT
TOTAL FRONT FEET ...................................
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS .................
PROJECT NO. 9811 COST PER FRONT FOOT .............................
NAME & ADDRESS
1. Denny R. Hendry
P.O. Box 98
Roseland, FL 32957
2.
9811 FlN2.WK4
0
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
11-31-38-00003-0020-00003.0
Lot 3, Block 2, Roseland Gardens SID
Denny R Hendry 11-31-38-00003-0020-00004.0
P.O. Box 98 Roseland Gardens S/D, Lot 4, Block 2, Less following
Roseland, FL 32957 described parcel: Begin at NWly comer of Lot 5, Block
2, run N 44 deg 22 min 00 sec W along Nly line of Lot 4,
6.39, thence run S 27 deg 50 min 50 sec W, parallel
with lot line between aforesaid Lots 4 & 5 136.14' to a
curve concave SWIy, having a radius 338.75' & through
which a radial line bears N 36 deg 08 min 58 sec E,
thence run SEly along the arc of said curve 6.07', through
a central angle of 01 deg 01 min 37 sec, thence run N 27
deg 50 min 50 see E along the Wly line said Lot 5, 135.14'
to Point of Beginning (OR Book 760 PP 861)
FRONT
FOOTAGE COST/F.F
62.97
93.70
$14.37
$14.37
TOTAL COST
$904.88
$1,346.47
EXHIBIT "A"
1,427.97
$20,519:93
$14.37
ASSESSMENT
COST
$904.88
$1,346.47
03><
w
0
CIQ
1 •
�2 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN,
FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT
TOTAL FRONT FEET ................................... 1,427.97
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS ................. $20,519.93
0$14.37
PROJECT NO. 9811 COST PER FRONT FOOT .............................
93
4.
4
A
9811FIN2.WK4
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
11-31-38-00003-0020.00006.0
FRONT ASSESSMENT
NAME &ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST COST
$14.37 $1,671.23 $1,671.23
Edward W. Arens, Sr.
11-31-38-00003-0020-00005.0 116.30
1034 Rose Arbor Drive
Roseland Gardens S/D, PBI 8-25. Lot 5, Black 2 &that
Sebastian, FL 32958
Part of Lot 4, Block 2 described as follows: Beginning at
Roseland Gardens SID, PBI 8-25, Lot 8, Block 2
NWly corner Lot 5, Block 2, run N 44 deg 22 min 00 sec
W along Nly line of Lot 4,6.3V, then run S 27 deg, 50
min 50 sec W parallel with lot line between aforesaid Lots
4 & 5, 136.14' to a curve concave SWIy having a radios
of 338.75' & through which a radial line bears N 36 deg
08 min 58 sec E, then run SEly along arc of said curve
6.07', through a central angle of 01 deg 01 min 37 see,
thea run N 27 deg 50 min 50 sec E along Wly line of said
Lot 5.135.14' to Point of Beginning.
4.
4
A
9811FIN2.WK4
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
11-31-38-00003-0020.00006.0
80 $14.37 $1,149.60 $1,149.60
Roseland Gardens S/D, PBI 8-25, Lot 6, Block 2
11-31-38-00003-0020-00007.0
80 $14.37 $1,149.60 $1,149.60
Roseland Gardens S/D, PBI 8-25, Lot 7, Block 2
11-31-38-00003-0020-00008.0
80 $14.37 $1,149.60 $1,149.60
Roseland Gardens SID, PBI 8-25, Lot 8, Block 2
E*xl'f H I B IT "All 03r,
ON
O\
tT
�O
0
•
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO: AIRPORT DRIVE ADJACENT TO COLLIER CLUB IN SEBASTIAN,
FLORIDA IN ROSELAND GARDENS S/D PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT
TOTAL FRONT FEET ................................... 1,427.97
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS .................. $20,519.93
PROJECT NO. 9811 COST PER FRONT FOOT ............................. $14.37
FRONT ASSESSMENT
NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE COST/F.F. TOTAL COST rOgT
7.
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
8.
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
3556 Lucia Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32967
9.
Ed & Eleanore O. Hader
P.O. Box 397
Roseland, FL 32957
10.
Ed & Eleanore O. Herder
P.O. Box 397
Roseland, FL 32957
11.
Emma M Decker
7 Oak Point Drive South
Bayville. NY 11709
12.
Herbert & Kathleen Severance
11135 Airport Drive
Sebastian, FL 32958
9811 FIN2.WK4
1 40
11 -31-38-00003-0020-00009.0
Roseland Gardens SID, PHI 8-25, Lot 9, Block 2
11-31-38-00003-0020-00010.0
Roseland Gardens SID, PBI 8-25, Lot 10, Block 2
11 -31 -38 -00003 -0020 -OW 11.0
Roseland Gardens SID. PBI 8-25, Lot 11, Block 2
11-31-38-00003-0020-00012.0
Roseland Gardens SID, PBI 8-25, Lot 12, Block 2
11-31-38-00003-0030-00001.0
Roseland Gardens S/D, PBI 8-25, Lot l & NWIy 10'
of Lot 2, Block 3
11-31-38-00003-0030-00002.0
Roseland Gardens SID, PBI 8-25, Lot 2 Less NWIy
10'& W 1/3 Lot 3, Block 3
80 $14.37
80 $14.37
80
100
100
110
$14.37
$14.37
$14.37
$14.37
$1,149.60
$1,149.60
$1,149.60
$1,437.00
$1,437.00
$1,580.70
$1,149.60
$1,149.60
$1,149.60
,..
$1,437.00
$1,437.00
$1,580.70
03r.
O�
ON
ON
�O
m
%A
O
_
I
BOOK i0a FAG -t 9
11.GA ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
COST -SHARE AGREEMENTS FOR ROSELAND AND GIFFORD
STORIVIWATER IMPROVEMENTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 23, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: St. Johns River Water Management District Cost -Share
Agreements for Roseland and Gifford Stormwater Improvements
REF. LETTER: Debbie Hancock, SJRWMD, to James Davis dated March 12, 1999
DATE: March 23, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County has been successful in receiving grants from SJRWMD for the
Gifford and Roseland Stormwater projects. The attached cost -share agreements
appropriate the lesser of $50,000 or 13% of the cost for the Gifford Project
and $35,000 or 15% of the cost for the Roseland Project. These projects are
currently being designed by Carter and Associates and are funded by the 10
Local Option Sales Tax Program. The grant is for a 3 -year period. Once
constructed, the County will be required to perform monitoring of the two
projects.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Acceptance of the grants will reduce the County's funding of the projects.
The alternatives presented are
Alternative No. 1
Accept the two grants (total of $85,000 maximum) and authorize the
Chairman to execute the Agreement. Funding for the County share
($541,800) will be from the 1fi Local Option Sales Tax ($1,000,000
budgeted for Stormwater Improvements).
Alternative No. 2
Deny acceptance of the grants.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING}
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the Chairman is authorized to
execute the project agreement. Funding of County share is by 10 Local Option
Sales Tax.
APRIL 69 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Agreementwith St. Johns
River Water Management District for Stormwater
Management Cost -Sharing Program and authorized
the Chairman to execute same, as recommended by
staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.1. BID #9019 - REMOVAL OF DIESEL FUEL STORAGE
TANKS - FINAL PAY REQUEST - FRED RICE & ASSOCIATES,
INC. - SEA OAKS AND SOUTH REGIONAL WWTP
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 1891999:
DATE: MARCH 18, 1999
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
HUB
DONALD R HUBBS,Q-T�p
DIRECTOR OF
PREPARED AND
GENE A RAUTH
STAFFED BY:
OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT: FINAL PAY REQUEST FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BID NO. 9019
REMOVAL OF DIESEL FUEL STORAGE TANKS - UTILITIES DEPT.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
On November 17, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved a contract with Fred Rice
& Associates, Inc., for the removal of two diesel tanks located at the Sea Oaks Wastewater
Treatment Plant and the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (see attached agenda item).
The removal of the tanks are complete in accordance with Indian River County Standards and
Specifications.
The Department is now prepared to finalize the project. Therefore, we are requesting approval by
the Board of County Commissioners to make final payment, in the amount of $8,400.00, to the
contractor.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached final pay request in the amount of $8,400.00 to Fred Rice &
Associates, Inc.. Funding available in account number 471-000-169-364.00 and 475-000-169-
111.00:
APRIL 6, 1999
-107- BOOKLlC3 F�1GE�
600KC� PAGE
ONMOTIONby Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved the final pay request in the amount of
$8,400 to Fred Rice & Associates, Inc., as
recommended by staff.
11.H.2. CHLORINATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - FINAL
PHASE - GLACE & RADCLIFFE - CAMP. DRESSER & MCKEE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 18, 1999:
DATE: MARCH 18,1999
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. hl
DIRECTOR OF S
PREPARED AND GENE A. RAUTH
STAFFED BY: OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT: Chlorination System Improvements, Final Phase
BACKGROUND
On December 22, 1998 the Board of County Commissioners considered an agenda item for the
above -referenced subject. During that meeting the Board approved staffs recommendation to
fast-track the Risk Management Plan (RMP) development, returning to the Board with the
appropriate work authorizations and agreements (see attached copy of agenda item, dated
December 14, 1998). As explained in an earlier agenda item, the preparation and submittal of Risk
Management Plans (RMP's) for all 10 of the treatment plants, as required by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) are due to EPA no later than June 21, 1999. To meet the June 21,
1999 deadline, the Board has authorized the staff of the Department of Utility Services, utilizing
a cross functional task team, to develop and implement the County's RMPs. The task team is
made up of representatives from:
• The Department of Utility Services
• The Department of Risk Management
• The Department of Emergency Management Services
• The County's Wastewater Treatment Consultant, Glace & Radcliffe, Inc.
• The County's Water Treatment Consultant, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.
ANALYSIS
As part of the overall compliance requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments and Accidental
Release Prevention (ARP) program (see attached agenda item, dated December 14, 1998), the
team is developing and implementing the specific RMP's for each of the 10 treatment plants as
required. A detailed engineering analysis called a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) is required as
Part of the County's ARP for each plant site. The PHA for each plant includes an Accidental
Release Prevention Plan, Hazard Analysis Assessment, Offsite Consequence Analysis and Process
Safety Analysis. The PIW s are a supplemental part to each plant's RMP and are a strategic part
of the County's ARPs. It is the team's recommendation to utilize additional resources from the
County's Water consultant, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM) and the County's Wastewater
consultant, Glace & Radcliffe, Inc. (G&R), to prepare these documents. These resources would
be an addition to the development and implementation of the County's RMPs and represents the
final phase of the Department's compliance effort.
The Department of Utility Services staff is requesting approval for the two work authorizations
which are part of the RMP and ARP submittal process (see attached) and are described as
follows:
APRIL 69 1999
-108-
• Work Authorization No. 2 with the County's wastewater consultant, Glace &
Radcliffe, Inc., is for preparation of the detailed Engineering analysis and study for
Accidental Release Prevention, Hazard Analysis Assessment, Consequence Analysis
and Release Scenarios, as required for the County's ARP for the following plants, with
a not -to -exceed amount of $13,600.00:
Glace & Radcliff Work Authorization #2 Scope
1. North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
2. West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
3. Via Royal Wastewater Treatment Plant
4. Vista Gardens Wastewater Treatment Plant
5. Sea Oaks Wastewater Treatment Plant
6. Blue Cypress Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facilities 3-6, of the above, are under the RMP threshold set by EPA and are included to meet the
due diligence report requirements.
• Work Authorization No. 7 with the County's water consultant, Camp Dresser &
McKee, Inc., is for preparation of the detailed Engineering analysis and study for
Accidental Release Prevention, Hazard Analysis Assessment, Consequence Analysis
and Release Scenarios as required for the County's ARP for the following plants, with
a not -to -exceed amount of $26,150.00:
CDM Work Authorization #7 Scope
1. North Regional RO Water Treatment Plant
2. South Regional RO Water Treatment Plant
3. Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
4. South Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facilities 1-4, of the above, are in close proximity to schools, parks or residential areas and must
meet rigorous RMP requirements. To meet the RMP time frame, CDM must proceed with the
scope of the work beginning April 5, 1999.
The attached project time -line establishes deadlines and delineates responsibilities among task
team members. The Emergency Plan For Hazardous Materials, developed by the Department of
Emergency Services and adopted by Resolution 98-115, will serve as a core document to the
RMP and ARP.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the Task -team's recommendations and approve the final work
authorizations which are part of the RMP and ARP submittal process (see attached). Funding is
available in 471-218-033.19 and 471-219-033.19.
ONMOTIONby Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved Attachment A Engineering Services Work
Authorization No. 2 with Glace & Radcliffe, Inc.
and Attachment A Engineering Services Work
Authorization No. 7 with Camp Dresser & McKee,
Inc., as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
APRIL 6, 1999
-109- o`1 7
600K PAGE ��:' �
L
BOOK 103 FAGS
B.A. CHAIRMAN KENNETH M MRCHT - REPORT ON LOST
TREE VILLAGE ISLANDS
Chairman Macht commented that it had been resolved sometime ago that if the
settlement seemed to be foundering, he would approach the ownership and make a proposal
based on the appraisals with a consideration for property values, etc. contained within those
parameters. He discovered through the legislative process an additional $2,000,000 which
could be added to the original offer and he made contact with the principals and made the
proposal. The offer was considered and subsequently rejected in a cordial and constructive
manner. He expressed the hope that this attitude portends some reasonable negotiations.
NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED OR TARN.
B.C. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE D. GINN - COMMENTS
REGARDING BEACH SURVEY
Commissioner Ginn stated that it had come to her attention that the beach survey was
being done at 7:10 in the morning. She expressed her concern that the beach researchers
were out there at that time of day and hoped the survey was being done in a manner which
would accurately reflect the use of the beaches.
Commissioner Adams believed that the survey is being conducted all day and noted
that the surveyors need to be out there early and late because of the walkers.
Commissioner Ginn believed it was time now to begin giving some thought to holding
workshops, and Commissioner Adams stated that the workshops will be scheduled. They
are trying to get the information as quickly and efficiently as possible.
NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
APRIL 6, 1999
D.D. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE - LETTER TO
GEORGE PERCY, STATE PRESERVATION OFFICER.
BUREAU OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION - LAMAC
WORKSHOP REGARDING JOINT TITLE
The Board reviewed the following draft letter:
Mr. George Percy
State of Florida preservation Offuw
Bureau of I; moric Preservation
ILA (hay Bwlding
500 South Bronough Strect
TallAmee. Florida 32399-0250
Dear W. Percy:
On twisira the Indian River County Board of C i " ' sinners, I would like to
thank you for reviewing our request and the request of Flo ' 'on of Counties on the
proposed t slnu n joint tide of lands purchased withIMW Lstate a 04 §Wrj &j T i ment Surds.
As an e)eacd co mty commissioner;the co-* Nstcnian, I certainly
appreciate your apprehensions and co r the erection of historical
resources. 1, personally, feel with a 1 e avn paelnership, uw
resources will have even stronger on. ' f swill also provide a greater
educational oppornu ty to prot sites..
In H& of the Land an an Advisory Council O.AMAC) decision to
workshop co�ern go like to offbr my services as a
rept I a professional historian and a background m
natural ve w our staff in now areas of historic preservation. so I feel T
would be an ' co
please do not hesitate to contact us.
Commissioner Stanbridge stated that she and Commissioner Adams had been in
Tallahassee at the LAMAC meeting and concerns had been expressed regarding the ability
of local governments to enforce rules. The Committee had agreed and invited local
governments to participate in trying to set criteria and guidelines on the State level. She
asked for permission to send the letter offering the County's cooperation.
APRIL 6. 1999
-111- BOOK 103 FAGUE419
BOOK NU
Commissioner Adams recommended that Commissioner Stanbridge's expertise be
added to the "shared title" discussions. She felt that, rather than waiting for LAMAC to issue
criteria, the County needs to be more proactive and have a say in establishing the criteria.
Commissioner Stanbridge believed it would be advantageous to have this additional
representation to address matters as they come up and alleviate fears.
Commissioner Ginn asked that the Board be kept advised of the progress.
ONMOTIONby Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved the draft letter and appointed
Commissioner Stanbridge to take part in the
LAMAC meetings.
14.11. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 11:12 a.m.
ATTEST:
�§ M10MIMM
Minutes Approved: %
0 19 19
APRIL 6. 1999