HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/4/1999•
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, MAY 4,1999 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street. Vero Beach. Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman (District 1)
Caroline D. Ginn, (District 5)
Ruth Stanbridge (District 2
John W. Tippin, (District 4)
James E. Chandler, County; Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Caroline Ginn
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
is
1. Add Item S.A. Representative Charles sembler, Report to the County.
2. Add Item S.M. Proclamation Honoring Jdm W. Tippin on Passing a Computer Course at Indian River Community college.
3. Add Iter 13.A., Chairman Macht, Personal Cotes.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of April 13, 1999
B. Special Meeting of April 19, 1999
C. Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated April 22, 1999) 1-9
B. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated April 23,1999) 10
C. I.R.C.'s Request for Extension of Site Plan
Approval for Round Island Park East
(memorandum dated April 20,1999) 11-16
D. Contract Modification #1 to Contractual Services
Agreement No. 99 -LM -4H-1040-01-131 Between
the Fla. Dept. of Comm. Affairs (DCA) and I.R.C.
to Develop a Local Mitigation Strategy (approved
by BCC on 5/19/98)
BOCK � lJ PAGE
J
I
BOOK I F4 U
T,2,"
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA Lcont'd.l:
PAGES
D. (cont'd.): Contract Modification #1 to an Inter -
Local Agreement between I.R.C. and the Treas.
Coast Reg. Planning Council (TCRPC) to Com-
plete a Single, Unified County -wide Local Miti-
gation Strategy (approved by BCC on 7/14/98)
and
Contract Modification #1 to a Municipality Sub-
contract Participant in the Development of a
Local Mitigation Strategy for I.R.C. for the follow-
ing municipalities: City of Fellsmere, Town of
Orchid, Town of I.R. Shores, City of Seb. and the
City of V.B. (approved by BCC on 7/22/98)
(memorandum dated April 15, 1999)
17-37
E. State Revenue Sharing Application
(memorandum dated April 27, 1999)
38-42
F. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #016
(memorandum dated April 28, 1999)
43-44
G. Universal Service Fund Agreement
(memorandum dated April 28, 1999)
45-66
H. Grant Agreement Between I.R.C. Healthy Start
Coalition, Inc., & V.B.-I.R.C. Recreation Dept.
Budget Amendment 017
(memorandum dated April 28, 1999) 67-75
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Brian K. Davis' Request for Abandonment of
"Lateral Boulevard" in the Fellsmere Area
(Legislative)
(memorandum dated April 27, 1999) 76-82
2. Final Hearing on Proposed Land Development
Regulation (LDR) Amendments
(memorandum dated April 26,1999) 83-128
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Communift Development
None
r�
U
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
Amended Joint Parking Lot Agreement
Between Baptist Church & IRC (Main Library)
(memorandum dated April 26, 1999)
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. CR512 (Fellsmere Rd.) Bridge Replacements-
Design/Build Contract with Zep Construction,
Inc. Part II Agreement
(memorandum dated April 26, 1999)
2. Kings Highway (58' Ave.) Improvements
Change Order No. 3
(memorandum dated April 27, 1999)
H. Utilities
1. Cherrywood Estates Subdivision Water Main
Project Final Payment & Approval of Change
Order No. 1 (Bid No. 9039)
(memorandum dated April 23, 1999)
2. Sebastian Water Assessment - Phase 2A
Final Payment and Approval of Change Order
No's. 1 & 2 (Bid No. 8065)
(memorandum dated April 23, 1999)
I. Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
B. Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
C. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Redistricting Meeting
(memorandum dated April 21, 1999)
0
BACKUP
PAGES
129-140
141-144
145-156
157-164
165-175
176-177
BOOK 1s r-_ �.�A-�
i.� F'Au"
BOOK U. H' 6)r j- 9
BACKUP
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd): PAGES
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
E. Commissioner John W. Tiaain
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 4/13/99
2. Continuing Engineering & Financial Services
RFP #9026, Full Cost Accounting Report
(memorandum dated April 16, 1999) 178-197
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of meeting.
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MAY 4, 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER ..................................... .........1-
2. INVOCATION ........................................ .........1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ............................. r ........ -1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ................................... 1-
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ........................ .2-
5.A. Representative Charles Sembler - Report To County ...... .........2-
5.B. Proclamation Honoring John W. Tippin On Passing A Computer Course At
Indian River Community College ............................. .3-
6.A. APPROVAL OF NMgUTES....................................... .5-
6.B. APPROVAL OF NUNUTES........................................ 5-
6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ............................. .........5-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ................................. .........5-
7.A. Approval of Warrants ....................................... 5-
7.B. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs ........... ........12-
7.C. Round Island Park East - Indian River County's Request for Extension of
Site Plan Approval ........................................ .13 -
MAY 49 1999
-1- GOOK 109 C! -7;io
BOOK DO FACE 14 1.
7.D. (i) Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Modification #1 to
Contractual Services Agreement No. 99 -LM -4H-1040-01-031 to Develop a
Local Mitigation Strategy (Approved 05/19/98); (ii) Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council Modification #1 to Inter -Local Agreement to
Complete a Single, Unified County -Wide Local Mitigation Strategy
(Approved 7/14/98); and (iii) City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, Town of
Indian River Shores, City of Sebastian and City of Vero Beach
Modification #1 to Municipality Sub -Contract Participant in the
Development of a Local Mitigation Strategy (Approved 7/22/98) .... -14-
7.E. State Revenue Sharing Application - Florida Department of Revenue
(DOR)................................................ .16-
7.F. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #016 ....................... .17-
7.G. Universal Service Fund Agreement - Indian River County Library and
BellSouth Telecommunications .............................. .19-
7.H. Indian River County Healthy Start Coalition, Inc. and Vero Beach -Indian
River County Recreation Department - Grant Agreement - Budget
Amendment #017 ......................................... .20-
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 99-041- BRIAN K. DAVIS - REQUEST
FOR ABANDONMENT OF "LATERAL BOULEVARD" IN THE FELLSMERE
AREA...................................................... .22-
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 99-013 AMENDING THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHANGING THE LIST OF
PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE MED (MEDICAL) ZONING DISTRICT,
AND AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 901, DEFINITIONS;
CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAPTER 912, SINGLE-FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT; CHAPTER 913, SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS; CHAPTER
917, ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES; CHAPTER 934,
EXCAVATION AND MINING, CHAPTER 952, TRAFFIC; AND CHAPTER
971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USE CRITERIA .......... .27 -
MAY 4, 1999
I I.C. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MAIN LIBRARY -
AMENDED JOINT PARKING LOT AGREEMENT .................. .51-
11.G.1. CR -512 (FELLSMERE ROAD) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT$ -
DESIGNBUILD CONTRACT WITH ZEP CONSTRUCTION, INC. -
PART H AGREEMENT .......................... ........52-
11.G.2. KINGS HIGHWAY (58TH AVENUE) IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE
ORDER #3 - DICKERSON FLORIDA ............... ........ .54-
11.H.1. BID #9039 - CHERRYWOOD ESTATES SUBDIVISION WATER MAIN
PROJECT - FINAL PAYMENT AND CHANGE ORDER #� -
DRIVEWAYS, INC . ...................................... .55-
11.11.2. BID #8065 - SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT PHASE2A - FINAL
PAYMENT AND APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS #1 AND #2 -
DRIVEWAYS, INC . .............................. ........ .56-
13.A. CHAIRMAN KENNETH R MACHT - PERSONAL COMMENTS ....... .57-
13.C. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE D. GINN - COUNCIL OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS -
REDISTRICTING MEETING ................................... .61-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................ .62 -
MAY 49 1999
-3- tOOK D 0 PnE 142
May 4, 1999
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, May 4, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Kenneth R Macht, Chairman; Fran B.
Adams, Vice Chairman; John W. Tippin; Caroline D. Grin; and Ruth Stanbridge. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vtunac, County
Attorney; and Patricia' Pd' Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Macht called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Tippin delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Ginn led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Macht requested 3 additions to today's Agenda:
1. Item S.A., Representative Charles Sembler, Report to the County.
2. Item S.B., Proclamation Honoring John W. Tippin on Passing a Computer
Course at Indian River Community College.
3. Item 13.A., Chairman Macht, Personal Comments.
MAY 49 1999
-1-j
6gOK '� PAGE'3
,
BOOK 10". FADE 14
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously added the above items to the
Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
S.A. REPRESENTATIVE CHARLES SEMBLER -REPORT TO COUNTY
Chairman Macht introduced Representative Sembler and noted that he is the person
who has "brought home the bacon". The County has never before been represented with
greater vigor and effectiveness.
Representative Charles Sembler thanked the Board for the opportunity to make a
short presentation. He felt the recent legislative session was a very successful one. He
reported briefly on the budget surplus and the plans for its use in education, social services
and cultural arts. He also noted that 7.5 million dollars had been approved for the effort to
keep the Dodgers in Vero Beach; 3.75 million to be funded this year and the balance next
year. He expressed his support for the beach preservation plans and for the extension of the
P2000 program, now known as Florida Forever. He encouraged the Board to engage the
water projects early as the funds will quickly be allocated.
0
Representative Sembler continued, mentioning budgeted items of particular interest
to Indian River County: water development and other water issues; recycling; the landfill;
CARL; the proposed Vero Beach High School Auditorium which will be very similar to
Sebastian River High's auditorium; parks such as Barber Street, Colorado inFellsmere, Duck
Point, Environmental Learning Center, Riverview Park in Sebastian, Sportsman's Park (the
gun range), North Indian River County Park, Troy Moody in Vero, the Sebastian Causeway,
and the Old School Restoration in Fellsmere, as well as the municipal sewer project in
Fellsmere, the Gifford Community Center and Indian River Community College youth
activity center. He also discussed funding for projects to clean the Sebastian River and the
Indian River Lagoon, as well as an additional $2,000,000 funding in county grants for Lost
Tree Islands. He noted that these are community interest issues , not "turkeys".
Chairman Macht commented that these certainly are not "turkeys" but "doves of the
very whitest plumage". These projects will impact the community for years to come. He
also noted that discussion had been held regarding naming a park for Representative
Sembler.
MAY 4, 1999
-2-
•
Commissioner Tippin commented that Representative Sembler had helped the
"redneck" image in a positive way and had provided the most effective representation for the
County since the 1940s and 1950s. The Representative has done a phenomenal job.
Commissioner Stanbridge thanked Representative Sembler for all his wonderful work
on historical and environmental issues.
Commissioner Ginn thanked him on behalf of the oceanfront homeowners for his
interest and input in that project.
Commissioner Adams felt that Representative Sembler is "every mother's son" with
his quick smile and neat hair, but she was not certain that Tallahassee is accustomed to
dealing with that type of individual. She shared a story from her visits to Tallahassee and
stated that all sorts of people come to visit the Representatives, especially the impressive
"slick suits" from South Florida, wearing their Italian loafers. While these people are talking
with Charlie, he is putting on his white fishing boots under the desk. These are old fishing
boots and are appropriately "fishy". When he steps out from behind the desk to wish them
a "goodbye", they immediately spot the boots and later can be heard to comment: "gosh, he
really is a redneck". On behalf of the Board, she presented Representative Sembler with a
new pair of white boots which had been signed by each of the Commissioners.
Representative Sembler responded that this is a great community to represent and he
is very optimistic about the new direction of Florida's government. He believed the new
Governor and his staff are very committed to doing the right thing but change will not
happen overnight. He is now going to take a small break to spend a little time with his
family and start getting his new house built. He thanked the Commissioners for the new
boots and noted that they will be hanging in his office as soon as he returns to Tallahassee.
S.B. PROCLAMATIONHONORIIVG J0HN W. TIPPIN ONPASSIIVG'A
COMPUTER COURSEATINDIANRIVER COMMUNITYCOLLEGE
The Chairman read and presented the following Proclamation to Commissioner
Tippin:
MAY 49 1999
-3- BOOK 100 PAGE J
Fl -
BOOK 109 PAIUt
- J;16
PROCLAMATION
HONORING JOHN W. TIPPIN
ON PASSING A COMPUTER
COURSE AT INDIAN RIVER
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
WHEREAS, JOHN W. TIPPIN is to be commended for mastering a computer course (Basic
Computing for Dummies) at Indian River Community College and receiving a diploma with a grade of
95, giving him an overall passing grade of "A"; and
WHEREAS, JOHN fully understands the theory and benefit of 800 Mhz; and
WHEREAS, JOHN W. TIPPIN is also a champion of women in distress, displaying advanced
technical knowledge on battery repair, and he knows how to wield a big stick, or hammer, as the case may
be, and
WHEREAS, JOHN possesses almost total recall about the history and events of Indian River
County and the days of his youth, and doesn't mind sharing this knowledge with one and all. In fact,
JOHN's memory is so keen, he remembers things that never happened; and
WHEREAS, JOHN is recognized as a connoisseur of fine food, and he knows where the best
"Death Dogs" can be purchased; and
WHEREAS, JOHN, because of falling out of boats, has become an expert in aquatic research
and has spent many hours exploring this topic:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that
JOHN W. TIPPIN
be honored for his diligence, exceptional knowledge and willingness to advance his education for the
further improvement of the execution -of his duties as County Commissioner of Indian River County, and
for his tender heart and helping hands in emergency situations.
Adopted this 4 day of May, 1999.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN R COUNTY, FLORIDA
neth R. Macht, Ithairmin
Commissioner Tippin thanked the Board and commented that he had taken a lot of
flak about being the only computer illiterate commissioner. He also noted that Indian River
Community College is a wonderful asset to the community and that none of us are ever too
old to learn.
MAY 49 1999
El
-4-
r:
0 1 0
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of April 13, 1999. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 13, 1999, as written.
6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to thel Minutes of the
Special Meeting of April 19, 1999. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Special
Meeting of April 19, 1999, as written.
6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of April 20, 1999. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 20, 1999, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Ginn requested that Item 7.H. be separated for discussion.
7.A. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 22, 1999:
MAY 49 1999
-5- iBOOKS �A�
BOOK 100 FADE 18
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: APRIL 22,1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRAN'T'S
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for
the time period of April 15 to April 22, 1999.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as
issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period from
April 15, 1999 through April 22, 1999, as
recommended by staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0019938
OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REL
1999-04-14
.00
VOID
0019939
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
1999-04-14
.00
VOID
0019941
OKEECHOBEE CO., PNTS DOMES REL
1999-04-15
167.25
0019942
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
1999-04-15
23.08
0019943
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
1999-04-21
3,800.70
0019944
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-04-21
6,487.50
0019945
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
1999-04-22
3,800.70
0235406
BARTELME, SHAWN
1998-01-08
.00
VOID
0235429
BARCUS, JOAN
1998-01-08
.00
VOID
0235436
PETRAITIS, EVELYN
1998-01-08
.00
VOID
0235805
CUNNINGHAM, JOSEPH T
1998-01-15
.00
VOID
0235818
NICHOLSON, SHARON
1998-01-15
.00
VOID
0235833
JOSLOW, JEFFREY
1998-01-15
.00
VOID
0235842
HARTLESS, GEORGE A
1998-01-15
.00
VOID
0236937
RIVERSIDE NATIONAL BANK
1998-02-05
.00
VOID
0237023
MC LENON, LOLETA
1998-02-05
.00
VOID
0237038
HOWTON, MELODY
1998-02-05
.00
VOID
0237052
STARR, MICHAEL D
1998-02-05
.00
VOID
0237091
TODD, KENYADA S
1998-02-05
.00
VOID
0237438
ROSE, DEENA
1998-02-12
.00
VOID
0237774
BURGOON BERGER CONST CO
1998-02-19
.00
VOID
0237810
MOORE, ROBIN
1998-02-19
.00
VOID
0237828
BAUDER, DAVID
1998-02-19
.00
VOID
0237844
TULIANO, CHRISTOPHER M
1998-02-19
.00
VOID
0238575
FLYNN, JEAN
1998-03-05
.00
VOID
0238578
GRAND HARBOR
1998-03-05
.00
VOID
0238579
HARRISON, R G
1998-03-05
.00
VOID
0238591
GHA, GRAND HARBOR LTD
1998-03-05
.00
VOID
0238597
BRYAN, LOIS
1998-03-05
.00
VOID
0238600
RIGHTON, HARRY
1998-03-05
.00
VOID
0238638
ASCENCION OSORIO
1998-03-12
.00
VOID
0238970
BRIDEAU, ANNE F
1998-03-12
.00
VOID
0238979
DANIEL, FRANK
1998-03-12
.00
VOID
0239082
COOK, WENDY J
1998-03-19
.00
VOID
0239606
HASENAUER, KRIS
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0239780
WILES, ALEX
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0239802
MOSELEY, DEBRA L
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0239809
LORINO, HONG -SUN
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0239821
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0239833
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0239867
GARCIA, ARTURO
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0239882
CARLIN, DR & MRS RICHARD T
1998-03-26
.00
VOID
0241216
HON, JOHN J
1998-04-23
.00
VOID
0241232
ZAPPALA JR, ALFRED F
1998-04-23
.00
VOID
MAY 49 1999
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0241233
RESALE HOME NETWORK
1998-04-23
.00
VOID
0241457
CASTORENA, ISRAEL O
1998-04-30
.00
VOID
0241696
FOGLRSONG, THOMAS N
1998-04-30
.00'
VOID
0241697
CAL BUILDERS INC
1998-04-30.00
VOID
0241736
ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES INC
1998-04-30
.00
VOID
0241810
CONSULTANT PUBLICATIONS
1998-05-07
.00,
VOID
0242476
JENNINGS, LOUISE
1998-05-14
.00
VOID
0242495
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1998-05-14
.00
VOID
0242861
PORTSIDE SYSTEMS
1998 -OS -21.00
VOID
0242868
BOYD, RICHARD F
1998-05-21
.00
VOID
0242876
LEAL, NELIO
1998 -OS -21
.00'i
VOID
0242881
SAUNDERS, JAMES F
1998 -OS -21
.00
VOID
0242916
FISH, KELLY
1998-05-21
.00
VOID
0242948
CONN, ALAN & SANDIE
1998-05-21.00
VOID
0244050
SUSAN DIAL
1998-06-18
.00
VOID
0244477
MARTIN, PATRICIA
1998-06-25
.00
VOID
0244587
ALBRECHT PAINTING
1998-06-25
.001
VOID
0244595
JUDON, KACHINA
1998-06-25
.00
VOID
0244617
SECURITY PACIFIC FINANCIAL
1998-06-25
.00,
VOID
0244678
CUBA, LYNN
1998-06-25.00II
VOID
0244709
DEAN, THOMAS
1998-06-25
. 00
VOID
0245247
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1998-07-02
.001
VOID
0245281
MELIN, SO INGAMAR
1998-07-02
.00
VOID
0245315
HARTELUST, HELENE E
1998-07-02
.00
VOID
0245330
THE SHOE DEPT #428
1998-07-02
.00I
VOID
0245345
BUTTS, JAMES E
1998-07-02.00
VOID
0251948
NICHOL, ROBERT F
1998-11-05
.00
VOID
0258350
OXMOOR HOUSE
1999-03-04
.00
VOID
0259324
SCHERWINSKY, IOLA
1999-03-18
.00
VOID
0259371
ZATREPOLER, CHARLES J
1999-03-18
.00
VOID
0259795
JOSE, DONALD G & DEBRA LEE
1999-03-25
.00
VOID
0260325
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-04-08
.00,
VOID
0260510
JOBE, DONALD G & DEBRA LEE
1999-04-08
.00'
VOID
0260670
HANSON, CHARLES & PETRONELLA
1999-04-15
.00
VOID
0260680
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1999-04-15
.00
VOID
0260819
SWOPE RECONSTRUCTION
1999-04-15
.00i
VOID
0260926
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-04-22
765.50'
0260927
ALSERTSONS SOUTHCO #4357
1999-04-22
74.48
0260928
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
1999-04-22
580.00
0260929
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
1999-04-22
275.00
0260930
AT YOUR SERVICE
1999-04-22
334.56
0260931
ABS PUMPS, INC
1999-04-22
1,913.0
0260932
AQUAGENIX LAND -WATER
1999-04-22
105.0
0260933
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
1999-04-22
43.75
0260934
A T & T
1999-04-22
12.60
0260935
AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE
1999-04-22
60.00
0260936
ASHWORTH INC
1999-04-22
64.OQ
0260937
ARROW MAGNOLIA INTERNATIONAL
1999-04-22
100.10
0260938
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
1999-04-22
120.0
0260939
AVMA ACTUATORS, INC
1999-04-22
610.6
0260940
ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO
1999-04-22
147.93
0260941
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
1999-04-22
2,028.34
0260942
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
1999-04-22
107.69
0260943
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1999-04-22
248.6
0260944
AMERITREND HOMES
1999-04-22
500.0
0260945
ASSOCIATES, THE
1999-04-22
7,310.16
0260946
A P C O FLORIDA CHAPTER
1999-04-22
75.00
0260947
AQUATIC WEED CONTROL INC
1999-04-22
175.00
0260948
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
1999-04-22
22.3:
0260949
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1999-04-22
2,752.5
0260950
BETTER BUSINESS FORKS, INC
1999-04-22
94.75
0260951
BLANKENSHIP & ASSOCIATES
1999-04-22
134.75
0260952
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1999-04-22
4,820.40
0260953
BARNETT BAIL BONDS
1999-04-22
1,272.00
0260954
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
1999-04-22
1,175.78
0260955
BRODART CO
1999-04-22
6,296.21
0260956
BILLING SERVICES INC
1999-04-22
13.42
0260957
BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS
1999-04-22
188.80
0260958
BOYETTE, JAMES E
1999-04-22
18.79
0260959
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
1999-04-22
160.Oq
0260960
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
1999-04-22
168.80
0260961
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1999-04-22
40.08
0260962
BELLSOUTH
1999-04-22
6,262.95
0260963
BOLLE AMERICA, INC
1999-04-22
578.40
0260964
BOBBY'S PLUMING
1999-04-22
3,350.0
0260965
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
1999-04-22
22,675.8
0260966
BASE CAMP OUTLET
1999-04-22
99.94
0260967
BMG
1999-04-22
38.54
0260968
BECHTOLD'S WELL DRILLING
1999-04-22
950.00
0260969
BELLSOUTH
1999-04-22
152.64
0260970
CAMERON & BARRLEY COMPANY
1999-04-22
1,561.02
0260971
COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO., INC
1999-04-22
134.00
0260972
CHANDLER, PHILLIP
1999-04-22
200.00
MAY 49 1999
8 0 0 K , U J mu" 7t JL19
MAY 49 1999
-8-
_I
BOOK 109 PAGE iM
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
OBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0260973
CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
1999-04-22
442.00
0260974
CONFERENCE OF COUNTY COURT
1999-04-22
400.00
0260975
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
1999-04-22
3,732.27
0260976
CAPP CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC
1999-04-22
500.00
0260977
CARLTON FIELDS, ATTORNEY
1999-04-22
2,070.58
0260978
CBIVERS NORTH AMERICA
1999-04-22
44.64
0260979
CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO.INC.
1999-04-22
500.00
0260980
CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
1999-04-22
778.65
0260981
CALL ONE, INC
1999-04-22
25.07
0260982
C V S 0 A
1999-04-22
90.00
0260983
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES
1999-04-22
12,666.67
0260984
CUSTOM PUMPS AND
1999-04-22
9,500.00
0260985
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1999-04-22
492.50
0260986
COPYCO, INC
1999-04-22
713.99
0260987
COLUMBIA HOUSE
1999-04-22
81.71
0260988
CHASE, WILLIAM J.
1999-04-22
1,000.00
0260989
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
1999-04-22
37,057.21
0260990
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
1999-04-22
1,437.51
0260991
COMPLETE MARINE SERVICES
1999-04-22
634.42
0260992
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
1999-04-22
333.50
0260993
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
1999-04-22
87.36
0260994
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1999-04-22
20,957.97
0260995
DOBY - SEACOAST SUPPLY
1999-04-22
45.00
0260996
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
1999-04-22
668.91
0260997
DRIVEWAYS INC
1999-04-22
32,204.11
0260998
DIVOTS SPORTSWEAR, INC
1999-04-22
205.39
0260999
DELRAY STAKES & SHAVINGS INC
1999-04-22
550.00
0261000
DISNEY'S CORONADO SPRINGS
1999-04-22
122.00
0261001
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1999-04-22
548.29
0261002
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
1999-04-22
192.98
0261003
DILLARD, CABBIE
1999-04-22
14.16
0261004
DILLON, EDWARD D
1999-04-22
300.00
0261005
EVANS, FLOYD
1999-04-22
12.50
0261006
ELITE FIRE & SAFETY
1999-04-22
3,276.00
0261007
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
1999-04-22
5,490.26
0261008
ELIJAH COMPANY
1999-04-22
35.20
0261009
EASY LIBRARY TOOLS
1999-04-22
73.95
0261010
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
1999-04-22
1,537.95
0261011
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1999-04-22
33,485.86
0261012
FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
1999-04-22
150.00
0261013
FOOT -JOY DRAWER
1999-04-22
767.67
0261014
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
1999-04-22
69.87
0261015
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
1999-04-22
681.60
0261016
FIRE CHIEF
1999-04-22
54.00
0261017
FLINN, SHEILA I
1999-04-22
287.00
0261018
FATHER & SON CARPET CLEANING
1999-04-22
268.80
0261019
FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-04-22
25.00
0261020
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
1999-04-22
57.70
0261021
FINK, BROOKE PESCIA
1999-04-22
2,512.72
0261022
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE
1999-04-22
75.00
0261023
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
1999-04-22
7.47
0261024
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-04-22
191.03
0261025
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1999-04-22
86.87
0261026
GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY
1999-04-22
632.82
0261027
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
1999-04-22
39.00
0261028
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1999-04-22
51.75
0261029
GRANDAGE,BRADFORD
1999-04-22
500.00
0261030
GRAY SUPPLY COMPANY
1999-04-22
72.58
0261031
GITELES, KRISTIN
1999-04-22
57.00
0261032
GRILL REFILL, INC
1999-04-22
93.00
0261033
B W WILSON CO
1999-04-22
170.00
0261034
HORNUNG'S PRO GOLF SALES, INC
1999-04-22
291.36
0261035
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
1999-04-22
254.75
0261036
HERITAGE QUEST
1999-04-22
1,561.75
0261037
BACK COMPANY
1999-04-22
1,783.46
0261038
HOLIDAY INN
1999-04-22
138.00
0261039
HAWLEY, ROBERT A
1999-04-22
101.52
0261040
HARTSFIELD, CELESTE L
1999-04-22
52.50
0261041
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1999-04-22
2,000.00
0261042
HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING
1999-04-22
165.00
0261043
HASENAUER, KRIS
1999-04-22
30.00
0261044
HENRY PRATT CO
1999-04-22
18,251.00
0261045
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-04-22
110.00
0261046
INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
1999-04-22
380.00
0261047
INDIAN RIVER ACE HARDWARE
1999-04-22
19.99
0261048
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1999-04-22
1,255.50
0261049
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-04-22
45.00
0261050
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1999-04-22
2,722.57
0261051
INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER
1499-04-22
637.10
0261052
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
1999-04-22
133.68
0261053
ISIS PUBLISHING
1999-04-22
27.00
0261054
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-04-22
1,300.00
0261055
INSURANCE SERVICING &
1999-04-22
630.39
0261056
IBM CORPORATION
1999-04-22
767.71
MAY 49 1999
-8-
_I
CHECK
NAME
��
CSECR
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0261057
INDIAN RIVER CLUB
1999-04-22
45,859.81
0261058
n* ANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH
1999-04-22
5,740.40
0261059
INTERNATIONAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
1999-04-22
72,125.00
0261060
INDIAN RIVER PLANTATION RESORT
1999-04-22
255.00
0261061
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-04-22
198,857.71
0261062
IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
1999-04-22
253.84
0261063
INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
1999-04-22
546.00
0261064
INDIAN RIVER INDUSTRIAL
1999-04-22
422,484.19
0261065
IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
1999-04-22
23.47
0261066
JACKSON ELECTRONICS
1999-04-22
73.90
0261067
JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
1999-04-22
1,696.70
0261068
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
1999-04-22
50.25
0261069
JOHN DEERE COMPANY
"1999-04-22
39,693.26
0261070
JUDGE, JAMES A II
1999-04-22
54.10
0261071
JORDAN, ELIZABETH M
1999-04-22
230.00
0261072
JOHNSON, CHARLES
1999-04-22
30.00
0261073
JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS, INC
1999-04-22
500.00
0261074
J A SEXAUER INC
1999-04-22
657.60
0261075
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
1999-04-22
14,668.00
0261076
JONES & JONES
1999-04-22
500.00
0261077
JOHNSON'S FLOWER WORLD FLORIST
1999-04-22
25.00
0261078
KELLY TRACTOR CO
1999-04-22
446.00
0261079
R & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
1999-04-22
70.16
0261080
LAW, BEULAH
1999-04-22
202.00
0261081
LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
1999-04-22
5,700.00
0261082
LUCAS WATERPROOFING CO, INC
1999-04-22
5,467.00
0261083
LEISURE ARTS, INC
1999-04-22
24.91
0261084
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1999-04-22
1,094.74
0261085
L B SMITH, INC
1999-04-22
913.45
0261086
LIVE OAR ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1999-04-22
15.00
0261087
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1999-04-22
979.42
0261088
LFI VERO BEACH, INC
1999-04-22
1,176.32
0261089
LESCO, INC
1999-04-22
179.00
0261090
LANDSCAPE CONNECTION
1999-04-22
454.49
0261091
LEWIS, PAM
1999-04-22
500.00
0261092
MCCALL ELECTRIC, INC
1999-04-22
905.00
0261093
MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
1999-04-22
111.18
0261094
MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
1999-04-22
79.90
0261095
MITCO WATER LAB, INC
1999-04-22
898.34
0261096
MIAMI ELEVATOR COMPANY
1999-04-22
1,958.00
0261097
MEDICAL PLACTICS LAB
1999-04-22
1,395.00
0261098
MCDADE WATERWORKS, INC
1999-04-22
46,829.56
0261099
MIAMI AUTO VISUAL COMPANY
1999-04-22
10,355.00
0261100
MERCURY TECHNOLOGIES
1999-04-22
332.37
0261101
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
1999-04-22
39.96
0261102
MENZ, NICHOLE
1999-04-22
62.50
0261103
MCCLEARY, MILDRED
1999-04-22
368.00
0261104
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
1999-04-22
117.64
0261105
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
1999-04-22
2,000.00
0261106
MARLIN DEVELOPMENT
1999-04-22
500.00
0261107
MAHONY, JOHN
1999-04-22
22.00
0261108
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
1999-04-22
359.66
0261109
NICOSIA, ROGER J DO
1999-04-22
4,480.00
0261110
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
1999-04-22
275.00
0261111
NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
1999-04-22
134.14
0261112
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
1999-04-22
86.22
0261113
NOCUTS, INC
1999-04-22
59.10
0261114
OMNIGRAPHICS, INC
1999-04-22
37.30
0261115
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
1999-04-22
19.35
0261116
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
1999-04-22
9,636.64
0261117
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
1999-04-22
103.58
0261118
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
1999-04-22
17,728.83
0261119
OLSSON, JAY E D.0
1999-04-22
280.00
0261120
PARKS RENTAL INC
1999-04-22
1,817.50
0261121
PEABODY HOTEL, THE
1999-04-22
300.00
0261122
PETTY CASH
1999-04-22
95.50
0261123
PUBLIC DEFENDER
1999-04-22
5,026.30
0261124
KEN PUTTICK BUICK CADILLAC
1999-04-22
200.00
0261125
PRECISIONS SMALL ENGINE
1999-04-22
320.07
0261126
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
1999-04-22
2,500.00
0261127
POWERLINE ELECTRIC
1999-04-22
63.50
0261128
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
1999-04-22
1,110.10
0261129
PUBLIX
1999-04-22
3.19
0261130
PRESS JOURNAL
1999-04-22
438.00
0261131
POSTMASTER
1999-04-22
132.00
0261132
PRIMARY CARE OF THE TREASURE
1999-04-22
630.00
0261133
PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
1999-04-22
422.10
0261134
PANGBURN, TERRI
1999-04-22
24.00
0261135
PRESS JOURNAL - SUBSCRIPTION
1999-04-22
117.00
0261136
PRESS JOURNAL/STUART NEWS
1999-04-22
1,548.84
0261137
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1999-04-22
165.54
0261138
PUBLIX
1999-04-22
315.00
0261139
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES, INC
1999-04-22
500.00
MAY 49 1999
-9- BOOK, PAGE i5v
BOOK
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0261140
PROFESSIONAL OUTFITTERS, INC
1999-04-22
5,219.50
0261141
PHELPS GARAGE & TOWING
1999-04-22
185.00
0261142
PESCIA, MARY
1999-04-22
95.00
0261143
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
1999-04-22
167.42
0261144
RADIO SHACK ACCT RECEIVABLE
1999-04-22
76.97
0261145
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
1999-04-22
317.71
0261146
R R BOWKER
1999-04-22
476.15
0261147
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
1999-04-22
7,273.15
0261148
RECORDED BOOKS INC
1999-04-22
275.90
0261149
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
1999-04-22
38.34
0261150
RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES
1999-04-22
13,174.12
0261151
RUBBER & ACCESSORIES, INC
1999-04-22
1,080.34
0261152
RENTAL 1
1999-04-22
60.60
0261153
RSR
1999-04-22
10,307.27
0261154
RAPP, PAMELA
1999-04-22
12.00
0261155
RAMADA PLAZA HOTEL GATEWAY
1999-04-22
148.00
0261156
R K DAVIS CONSTRUCTION CORP
1999-04-22
193.25
0261157
REYNOLDS, SMITH & HILLS INC
1999-04-22
3,148.34
0261158
SCHLITT INSURANCE SERVICES INC
1999-04-22
80.00
0261159
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
1999-04-22
434.67
0261160
SCOTTY'S, INC
1999-04-22
10.36
0261161
SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
1999-04-22
18.28
0261162
SEITNER SALES
1999-04-22
13.25
0261163
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
1999-04-22
102.46
0261164
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
1999-04-22
318.20
0261165
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
1999-04-22
180.85
0261166
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
1999-04-22
175.07
0261167
SNELL, RICK
1999-04-22
30.00
0261168
SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
1999-04-22
64.30
0261169
ST JOHN'S RIVER WATER MGMT
1999-04-22
350.00
0261170
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1999-04-22
1,381.49
0261171
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
1999-04-22
124.95
0261172
SIMON & SCHUSTER
1999-04-22
630.93
0261173
SAFESPACE
1999-04-22
1,250.00
0261174
SALEM PRESS, INC
1999-04-22
207.50
0261175
SAFETY EQUIP COMPANY
1999-04-22
316.80
0261176
SPALDING
1999-04-22
446.52
0261177
SELIG CHEMICAL IND
1999-04-22
174.31
0261178
STATE OF FLORIDA
1999-04-22
8,849.36
0261179
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
1999-04-22
425.96
0261160
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
1999-04-22
13,267.80
0261181
SI4S, MATTHEW
1999-04-22
154.28
0261162
SWOPE RECONSTRUCTION
1999-04-22
1,069.17
0261183
SANFILIPPO, PETER
1999-04-22
65.00
0261184
STANBRIDGE, RUTH
1999-04-22
60.50
0261185
SUNET DIRECT
1999-04-22
375.00
0261186
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
1999-04-22
160.00
0261187
SUNSHINE PEST MANAGEMENT
1999-04-22
195.00
0261188
SHORE -LINE CARPET SUPPLIES OF
1999-04-22
23.57
0261189
SEKOT LABORATORIES INC
1999-04-22
2,500.00
0261190
SHELDON, JAMES
1999-04-22
679.96
0261191
SPILLIS CANDELA & PARTNERS,INC
1999-04-22
2,500.00
0261192
SOUTHERN CUTER SUPPLIES INC
1999-04-22
83.00
0261193
SHIELDS, VANESSA
1999-04-22
55.36
0261194
SCHWEY, PAUL MATTHEW
1999-04-22
36.00
0261195
SPI, INC
1999-04-22
122.50
0261196
STOEBER, DANIEL
1999-04-22
2,435.00
0261197
SQUARERIGGER CARP
1999-04-22
1,812.00
0261198
STURM, HERB
1999-04-22
42.73
0261199
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMNT
1999-04-22
350.00
0261200
SHELL FLEET CARD
1999-04-22
1,302.96
0261201
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
1999-04-22
38.62
0261202
SOUTHWESTERN SUPPLIERS INC
1999-04-22
20,937.29
MAY 49 1999
00 FAGE J_ 5�
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0261203
STALRUT, SHANNON L
1999-04-22
61.50
0261204
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-04-22
1,033.99
0261205
TITLEIST DRAWER
1999-04-22
1,476.00
0261206
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
1999-04-22
33,454.02
0261207
T-SHIRT FACTORY
1999-04-22
1,267.SO
0261208
TERRA
1999-04-22
1,610.75
0261209
TLC DIVERSIFIED, INC
1999-04-22
61,581.60
0261210
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
1999-04-22
138,694.07
0261211
TIPPIN, JOHN W
1999-04-22
26.62
6,108.72
0261212
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
1999-04-22
0261213
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
1999-04-22
773.00
0261214
T C I MEDIA SERVICES
1999-04-22
100.00
0261215
TSONAS, CHRISTOPHER D
1999-04-22
500.00
0261216
TOORE INVESTMENTS, INC
1999-04-22
7,360.00
0261217
TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF
1999-04-22
1,349.99
0261218
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA/
1999-04-22
39.001
0261219
UPSTART
1999-04-22
95.12
0261220
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
1999-04-22
671.621'
0261221
IIS FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1999-04-22
28,342.73
0261222
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
1999-04-22
4,260.60
0261223
VELDE FORD, INC
1999-04-22
2,486.901
0261224
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-04-22
199.00
0261225
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-04-22
38,666.39
0261226
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1999-04-22
71.29
0261227
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-04-22
20.00
0261228
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-04-22
125.00
0261229
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
1999-04-22
25.0
0261230
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
1999-04-22
27.2
0261231
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-04-22
732.7
0261232
WRITER'S DIGEST BOOKS
1999-04-22
852.15
0261233
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-04-22
121.65
0261234
WINN DIXIE ORLANDO
1999-04-22
449.33
0261235
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
1999-04-22
23.6
0261236
WILLHOFF, PATSY
1999-04-22
234.0
0261237
WINN DIXIE STORE
1999-04-22
20.0
0261238
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
1999-04-22
291.00
0261239
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
1999-04-22
61.50
0261240
WALGREENS PHARMACY
1999-04-22
132.8'
0261241
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
1999-04-22
515.5
0261242
WOLFE, ERIN
1999-04-22
16.7
0261243
WATERVIEW PRESS INC
1999-04-22
18.9
0261244
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
1999-04-22
110.44
0261245
YACKSO, STEVEN A
1999-04-22
500.00
0261246
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
1999-04-22
130.94
0261247
ZINKMUG N, KARL
1999-04-22
33.3
0261248
JOHNSON, LETISHA D
1999-04-22
988.0
0261249
FAVA, RICHARD J
1999-04-22
105.0
MAY 49 1999
1,673,227.64
-11- BOOK � PAGE 1513
BOOK jaj
7.B. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT -RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 23, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County AttomeZ0 --
DATE: April 23, 1999
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the week of April 19, 1999. Listed below are the vendors names and the amount of each court
related costs.
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
87.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
119.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
105.00
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
35.00
Debby Thomas
Transcription
59.50
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
56.00
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
63.00
Shirley Corbin
Transcription
91.00
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
59.50
Barbara Schopp
Transcription
59.50
Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
56.00
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
49.00
Interim Court Reporting
Transcription
575.50
Ralph Mora, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Carlos Wells, Esq.
Public Defender Costs
55.50
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
525.00
Patricia Held
Transcription
17.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
171.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
80.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
259.00
Ralph Mora, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
31.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
115.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
24.50
Barbara G. Schopp
Transcription
168.00
Federal Express
Public Defender Costs
51.25
Interim Court Reporting
State Attorney Costs
25.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
38.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
77.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
56.00
Nation Bank
State Attorney Costs
10.90
Claudia Orme
Witness Reimbursement
93.00
Ralph Mora, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Olga Mas
Court Interpreter
37.50
Steven A. Long, Esq.
Probate Legal Services
880.00
Shawn Welch
State Attorney Costs
370.98
Esquire Reporting, Inc.
Court Reporter
25.00
Totalp,
$6,529.13
ca Judge Kanarek
pp,�
APPR^'/ED FOR 5- 4 ' q -1
AGENDA
COUNTY ATTORNEY
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TARN.
MAY 41, 1999
-12-
0
_I
EXTENSION OF SITE PLANAPPROVAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 20, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D HEAD CONCURRENCE:
o ert M. eating, AI
Community Devvelopm D- for
%%
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AMP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICD A0 -,A
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: April 20, 1999
SUBJECT: Indian River County's Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval for Round
Island Park East [SP -MA -98-06-30 / 980300761
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 4, 1999.
On April 9, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted site plan approval to construct
improvements at Round Island Park east, located on the east side of SR A -1-A, close to the S . Lucie
County line. The application was approved with no conditions. The current expiration dat of the
site plan approval is April 9, 1999.
Prior to that expiration date, the project applicant filed a request to extend the site plan approval
expiration date. The applicant cites permitting issues as the reason for the delay in construction.
Pursuant to site plan regulations, the extension request may now be considered by the Bard of
County Commissioners.
ANALYSIS:
Although the LDRs have been amended since the time of project review and approval, the embers
of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that subsequent amendments as appli to the
subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or redesign of the project
conceptual plan. AllTRC staff members have recently approved the applicant's request for site plan
extension.
As allowed under provisions of the LDRs, Indian River County is requesting a full o ie year
extension of the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the LDRs, thBoard
of County Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with additional conditions the requested
site plan extension. Staff has no objections to the Board granting the request since the previously
approved site plan substantially conforms to existing LDR requirements.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Indian River County's) request
for a one year extension of the site plan approval. The new site plan approval expiration to will
be April 9, 2000.
MAY 49 1999
-13-
BOOK 109- F, Ui.
F,
BOOK io, F"�ur 5
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved a one-year extension
of the site plan approval with a new expiration date
of April 9, 2000, as recommended by staff.
7.D. (I� FLORIDA DEPART OF ComwuNITYAFFAIRS 02CA)
MODIFICATION #1 TO CONTRACT UAL SERVICES AGREEMENT No. 99 -
LM -4H-1040-01-031 TO DEVELOP A LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY
(APPROVED 05/19/98,• (II) TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING
COUNCIL MODIFICATION #1 TO INTER -LOCAL AGREEMENT TO
COMPLETE A SINGLE. UNIFIED COUNTY -WIDE LOCAL MITIGATION
STRATEGY (APPROVED 7/14/98): AND (III Crry OF FELL swR& ToWN
OF ORCHID, TOWN OFINDIANRIVER SHORES, CITY OFSEBASTIANAND
CITY OF VERO BEA CHMODIFICATION #1 TO MUNICIPA=SUB-
CONTRACT PARTICIPANT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LOCAL
Mn7GA7I0NSTRA7EGY(APPROVED 7/22/98
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 15, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Services
DATE: April 15, 1999
SUBJECT: ContractModification#1 to Contractual ServicesAgreementNo.99-LM-4H-1040-01-031 Between
the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and Indian River County to Develop a Local
Mitigation Strategy (approved by the BCC on 5/19/98).
Contract Modification #1 to an Inter -Local Agreement between Indian River County and the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) to Complete a Single, Unified County -wide
Local Mitigation Strategy (approved by the BCC on 7/14/98).
Contract Modification #1 to a Municipality Subcontract Participant in the Development of a Local
Mitigation Strategy for Indian River County for the following municipalities: City of Fellsmere,
Town of Orchid, Town of Indian River Shores, City of Sebastian and the City of Vero Beach
(approved by the BCC on 7/22/98).
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at the next scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Modifications to the above referenced Agreements have become necessary due to the Department of Community
Affair's delay in providing data associated with model runs from The Arbiter of Storms (TAOS) computer model.
The TAOS computer model is needed to complete an accurate vulnerability assessment for Indian River County and
each of its municipalities.
MAY 49 1999
4) 0
0
•
RECOMMENDATION:
The Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group and staff recommends modifying the Scope of Work due date for the
4th contract period deliverable and the 5th contract period deliverable due date to October 31, 199 and the
municipalities' revised scope of work due one month prior (September 30, 1999). This will afford staff extra time
to complete the project in the event that the TAOS computer model is delayed by DCA once again. We will retain
the option of submitting the contract deliverables early, if applicable, and receiving payment for work completed.
ATTAC><IIVIENTS:
Four original copies of Modification #1 to contract with Florida DCA.
Four original copies of Modification #1 to Inter -Local Agreement with TCRPC.
Four original copies of Modification #1 for each Subcontract Participant (City of Fellsmere, Town of Orc�d, Town
of Indian River Shores, City of Sebastian and the City of Vero Beach).
Revised Attachment A - Scope of Work.
Letter dated April 13, 1999 from DCA explaining the delay in providing the TAOS computer model.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved (i) Modification # 1 to
Contractual Services Agreement #98 -LM -4H-1040-
01-031 with the State of Florida, Department of
Community Affairs; (ii) Modification #1 to Inter -
Local Agreement with Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council; and (iii) Modification # 1 to Scope
of Work of the Municipality SubContract Participant
in the Development of a Local Mitigation Strategy
with: the City of Fellsmere, the Town of Orchid, the
Town of Indian River Shores, the City of Sebastian,
and the City of Vero Beach, as recommended by
staff.
MODIFICATION #I WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CO v"4aacA
AND MODIFICATION #1 VAM CITY OF FELLSME
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
L� OTHER DOCUMENTS *%A; BB ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
MAY 49 1999
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-15- ,g
BOOK. F'A;;. 157 ;;A
VAGr
7.E. STATE REVENUE SHAR71yGAPPLIC4TION- FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE (DOR,
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 27, 1999;
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: April 27,1999
SUBJECT: State Revenue Sharing Application
FROM: Ed Fry, Finance Director 6L
Bac ground Information
Attached to this memorandum is the State Revenue Sharing application that must be filled in, signed,
and returned to the State by June 30, 1999. This application must be completed and filed on a timely
basis in order for the County to receive State Revenue Sharing funds. For the 1998 fiscal year, the
County received $2,908,887.00 in State Revenue Sharing fiords. As of April, 1999, the County has
received $1,272,525.00.
The Sheriff and the Director of the Department of Emergency Services have completed and signed
the appropriate sections of the application. The County has complied with all of the requirements
set forth in the application and has filed all reports that are required to be filed with the State. All
sections of the application have been completed and the application has been signed by the Chief
Fiscal Officer.
Request the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the
State Revenue Sharing application.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to
execute the State Revenue Sharing application with
the Florida Department of Revenue, as
recommended by staff.
APPLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
MAY 49 1999
• -16- .
Z F. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT #016
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 28, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: April 28, 1999
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 016
CONSENT AGENDA
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Analyst
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate fimding for the following:
1. The Board of Commissioners has approved payment of annual fees for tax deed
applications for numerous parcels. The attached entry appropriates funding in the
amount of $7,500 from the General Fund reserve for contingencies.
2. The Budget Office underestimated the amount of expenditures for external auditors for
the current fiscal year. An additional $9,600 is needed to cover these expenses. F ding
will be provided by the General Fund reserve for contingencies.
3. The Personnel Department has incurred higher than expected costs in salan and
benefits associated with the reinstatement of the Personnel Director. The attached entry
appropriates funding from General Fund cash forward revenues.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached udget
amendment.
MAY 49 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget
Amendment #016, as recommended by staff.
-17- ROOK 0 � Ptk F
I
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
BOOK
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 016
DATE:_ pr
Ll 28, 1999
109 Ft1GE,®
Entry
Number
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Board of Commissioners/ Tax
Deed Fees
001-101-511-033.19
$7,500
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$7,500
2.
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Board of Commissioners/
External Auditors
001-101-511-033.21
$9,600
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$9,600
3.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Cash Forward Revenues
001-000-389-040.00
$110,929
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Regular Salaries
001-203-513-011.12
$85,000
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Social Security
001-203-513-012.11
$5,270
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Retirement
Contribution
001-203-513-012.12
$13,983
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Health & Life
Insurance
001-203-513-012.13
$4,380
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Worker's
Compensation
001-203-513-012.14
$238
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Unemployment
Compensation
001-203-513-012.15
$825
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Medicare Matching
001-203-513-012.17
$1,233
$0
MAY 49 1999
LIBRARYAND BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 28, 1999:
Date: April 28,1999
To: The honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator -4f..I u �
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director
Subject: Universal Service Fund Agreement
BACKGROUND:
Under criteria established by Congress through the Telecommunications Act of 1996, qualifying schools and
libraries may receive between 20 and 90 percent discounts towards the purchase of telecommunications services
(telephone - Internet) under a program known as the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Program (E -Rate). A
non-profit corporation, the Schools and Library Corporation is responsible for administering the programun er the
direction of the Federal Communications Commission
The Indian River County library system has qualified for a 691/o discount on its communications costs.
Accordingly, by entering into the attached agreements, the library will receive cash rebates back from Bell ouch
deeply discounting the original billing by 690/6. The criteria for establishing the rate of discount is based the
number of children receiving school lunch subsidies.
ANANLYSIS•
There are five separate agreements to be approved totaling an amount not to exceed $11,521.62 to be refimc ed to
Indian River County for the time period April 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999. Each specific telecommunications
account is identified by a Funding Request Number (FRN) as follows:
FRN
Amount
37400
$2,980.80
37572
$4,011.66
37605
$2,666.16
37612
$1,465.56
37579
$397.44
These agreements are extremely beneficial to the Country and should be executed. Since these are thefist of
hopefully many such agreements, it was the recommendation of the Attorney's office that these initial agreements
be brought forward to the Board for their approval along with authorization for the Director of Library Services to
execute these agreements and any subsequent agreements providing for a discounted refund to the County.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the agreements as presented and authorize the Director of Library Services to execute these agreements
and authorize execution of subsequent agreement providing refunds under this same program.
MAY 49 1999
-19- P OK iUJ PAGE
BOOK J09 PAGE j�j"?
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the agreements as
presented, authorized the Director of Library
Services to execute the agreements, and authorized
execution of subsequent agreements providing
refunds under this same program, as recommended
by staff.
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7.H. INDIANRIVER COUNTYHEALTHYSTART COALITION. ING AND VERO
BEACH-INDIANRIVER COIINTYRECREATIONDEPARTMENT - GRANT
AGREEMENT - BUDGET AMENDMENT #017
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 28, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: April 28, 1999
SUBJECT: GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY
START COALITION, INC. AND VERO BEACH -INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
RECREATION DEPARTMENT - BUDGET AMENDMENT 017
CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Vero Beach -Indian River County Recreation Department is receiving a grant from the Indian River
County Healthy Start program to fiord 100% of a parent education opportunities program. A trained
recreation coordinator will network with the parents of young children (one to three years of age),
implement support groups to discuss and enhance parenting skills as well as family self-esteem.
Working with existing Recreation Department's classes, Parent Education Opportunities will be
offered to parents of children who are attending Recreation Department classes. The Parent
Education Opportunities will be offered in a nearby, convenient location to begin immediately after
the child's class beginning time and to end immediately prior to the child's class ending time. In
conjunction with faith community leaders, child care directors, school administrators and other
organizations, the Recreation Department will identify time and place forregularly scheduled Parent
Education Opportunities throughout the county. All groups are to be open to the public. Additional
responsibilities include organization and oversight of training of leaders. These services can also
be provided in the neighborhood, school workplace, etc. wherever the concerns, priorities, and
resources of the parent or caregiver can best be met.
MAY 49 1999
-20-
_I
The estimated cost of the program for 1998/99 fiscal year is $16,864 and 1999/2000 cots are
estimated at $36,175.
$11,864 - Salaries and Benefits
S5,000 - Other Oneratin lies
$16,864 -1998/99 FY Total
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the
memorandum of agreement and approve and budget amendment in the amount of $16,864 tb fund
the cost of the additional position in Recreation effective immediately.
Commissioner Ginn recommended that this project should be Handled by the
Children's' Services Network sometime in the future.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the
Memorandum of Agreement and approved Budget
Amendment #017 in the amount of $16,864 to fund
the cost of the additional position in Recreation
effective immediately, as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
TO: Members of the Board BUDGET AMEN) MENT: 017
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird DATE: Aril R8,1999
OMB Director
Entry
Number
Funds/DepazOmendAccount Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
REVENUES
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/
Reimbursements
004-000-369-040.00
$ 6,864
$0
EXPENSES
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/
Recreation/ Regular Salary
004-108-572-011.12
S3,124
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Recreation/
Social Security
004-108-572-012.11
504
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Recreation/
Retirement
004-108-572-012.12
825
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Recreation/
Insurance and Life
004108-572-012.13
$,855
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Recreation/
Worker's Compensation
004-108-572-012.14
$438
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/
Recreation/ Medicare Matching
004-108-572-012.17
118
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/
Recreation/ Other Operating Supplies
004-108-572-035.29 J
$ ,000
$0
MAY 49 1999
-21- BOK PAGE
I
BOOK PnE .�
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 99-041- BRIAN K.
DAVIS - REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF
"LATERAL BOULEVARD" IN THE FELLSMERE AREA
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 27, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DMSION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AkgP
Community Development Director
SIJ
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICPA tk
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: April 27,1999
SUBJECT: Brian K. Davis' Request for Abandonment of "Lateral Boulevard" in the
Fellsmere Area
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 4, 1999.
Mr. Brian K. Davis has submitted a petition to abandon "Lateral Boulevard" located north of C.R.
512 in the Fellsmere area Lateral Boulevard is located north of C.R. 512 on the east side of
Fellsmere Farms tracts 1765 and 1728 and on the west side of the Park Lateral Canal (see attachment
#2). The subject right-of-way measures approximately 1200' long by 55.5' wide, and is separate from
the Park Lateral Canal right-of-way.
The applicant is requesting that the subject segment of right-of-way be abandoned to consolidate his
property and increase its development potential. If abandoned, the entire right-of-way area will be
added to tracts 1765 and 1728 since the right-of-way was originally dedicated from these tracts. The
Board of County Commissioners is now to consider the abandonment request
The subject right-of-way was created with the Fellsmere Gables plat in December of 1925. That plat
covered Tracts 1728 and 1765, and created approximately 198 lots and 5 other road rights-of-way.
In 1938, a replat of tracts 1728 and 1765 was approved, which returned the entire Fellsmere Gables
property to acreage except for the Lateral Boulevard right-of-way. The right-of-way has not been
used since its creation and is essentially a paper street This right-of-way is adjacent and contiguous
to the Park Lateral right-of-way, which is 175' wide at the subject location. The 175' of Park Lateral
right-of-way consists of 125' from the original Fellsmere Farms plat and 50' additional feet acquired
after the plat This request does not affect the Park Lateral Canal right-of-way, which will remain
at a width of 175' at the subject location.
MAY 49 1999
•
Although the county does not desire to use the right-of-way for road building purposes, the right-of-
way could still be used for future drainage and utility purposes. Therefore, county staff is
recommending that a 15' wide drainage and utility easement be retained over the east 15' of the to -be -
abandoned right-of-way. For that reason, the Resolution of Abandonment expressly reserves a
drainage and utility easement over the east 15' of the to -be -abandoned right-of-way segment.
Per guidelines established by the Board of County Commissioners, this petition was revi by all
county divisions and utility providers having jurisdiction or potential interests within then t -of -
way. In addition, per county regulations, adjacent property owners were notified by mail prior to
staff s review meeting (the Technical Review Committee meeting of June 3, 1998). All reviepwing
agencies and departments have recommended approval of the requested abandonment, 'th the
condition that an easement for utilities and drainage be reserved over the east 15' of the =7=
area.
area The subject right-of-way is not part of the roadway system as noted on the County
Thoroughfare Plan, and is not needed for the thoroughfare system. Furthermore, the abandonment
would not affect the right of convenient access to surrounding properties. Also, the County
Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the attached abandonment resolution for lep. form
and sufficiency.
Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners abandon its rights
to the subject right-of-way and authorize the chairman to execute the attached abando7ent
resolution, with the following condition:
1. That a 15' wide drainage and utility easement be reserved over the east 15' of the area to be
abandoned.
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the Memorandum.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
MAY 49 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 99-041 providing
for the closing, abandonment, vacation and
discontinuance ofLateral Boulevard as shown onthe
Replat of Tracts 1728 and 1765 of The Fellsmere
Farms Company and reserving a 15' wide drainage
and utility easement over a portion of the abandoned
right-of-way.
•
-23- 800K I PAGE 165
BOOK 109 MdSIG
RESOLUTION NO. 99-41
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING,
ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF LATERAL
BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON THE REPLAT OF TRACTS 1728 AND 1765 OF
THE FELLSMERE FARMS COMPANY AND RESERVING A 15' WIDE
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF THE
ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY SAID LAND LYING IN INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, on May 18, 1998 Indian River County received a duly executed and
documented petition from Brian K Davis of Vero Beach, Florida, requesting that the County close,
vacate, abandon, discontinue, renounce and disclaim any right, title and interest of the County and
the public in and to Lateral Boulevard as shown on the replat of tracts 1728 and 1765, said lands
lying in Indian River County, Florida, and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes 336.10, notice of a public hearing to
consider said petition was duly published, and
WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting documents, staff investigation and
report, and testimony ofall those interested and present, the Board finds that the subject right-of-way
is not a state or federal highway, nor located within any municipality, nor is said right-of-way
necessary for continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, nor access to any given
private property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1. All right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to that certain right-of-way
being known more particularly as:
SEE EXHIBIT "A"
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
is hereby forever closed, abandoned, vacated, discontinued, renounced and disclaimed,
except for a 15' wide drainage and utility easement which is hereby reserved over the east 15' of the
entire abandoned right-of-way.
2. The closing, vacation, abandonment, discontinuance and disclaimer of this public right-of-
way is in the best interests of the public.
3. Notice of the adopting of this resolution shall be forthwith published once within thirty (30)
days from the date of adoption hereof, and
4. The Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution together with the proofs of publication
required by Florida Statutes 336.10 in the Official Record Books of Indian River County
without undue delay.
Said right-of-way shall be returned in its entirety to tracts 1728 and 1765 Fellsmere Farms
Company.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner. Adams who moved
its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner G i n n , and upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
MAY 49 1999
Chairman Kenneth R Macht A y e
Vice - Chairman Fran B. Adams A y e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A y e
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge A y e
Commissioner John W. Tippin A y e
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 4 day of
May , 1999.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN R CO LORIDA
BY: >,t Kenneth R Macht, C
Board of County Commissioners
ATTE :�
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
State of Florida
County of Indian River
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State
and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared KENNETH R MACHT, and
PATRICIA M. RI D(3EI.Y , as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy
Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this - fo( day of
A.D., 1999.
Notary Public -
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY: 4/y 4'�-,-�
William G. Collins,
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Ajj-
BY: w,- 44!� fk
Robert M. Keating, AIL. , Director
Community Development Division
MAY 49 1999
5*19
JJWWWlN!!!AN!!!!!Np!
IAliaLWhiteNoway raft, Sm ofFlorida Cmunnim No. CCl7a n
yco�aeEv.OMMMd�a+or�tn. �►Na•re..w•a.awca'
ROOK FAUSE'
Go
171-4
w
C3
C-73
0
0
ca
TRACT 1765
FELLSMERE
S 0'39'51 " W
N 0'39'51 " E
Sj1 PARK
�O.
J
DRAINAGE
L A T E R A L
TRACT 1728
1229.09'
1174.80' b
Ln
C A N A L N
DISTRICT
Scale: 1't--100'
3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF VACATED STREET
Lateral Boulevard, as shown on the replat of Tracts 1728 and 1765 of Fellsmere Farms Company, being a replat of Fellsmere Gables, a
lying between the South line of Road and Ditch No. 16 and the Northerly line of C.R. 512, further described as follows:
The West 55.5 feet of the East 230.5 feet of Tracts 1728 and 1765 of the Fellsmere Farms Subdivision of oil unsurveyed part of
Township 31 South, Range 37 East, according to the plat filed in Plat Book 2, Pages 1 and 2 of the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida, lying between Road and Ditch No. 16 on the North, and the Northerly line of C.R. 512 on the South. a
Subject to a 15—foot drainage & utility easement over the East 15 feet thereof.
Now lying in Indian River County, Florida. e
CERTIFICATION 3
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state Y
of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify CL
that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 61G17 of the Florida Administrative Code,
pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY a:
Charles A. Cromer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960
Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 90
Date /Z VQrch
ON
•
0
•
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE 99-013 AMENDING
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (CURS)
CHANGING THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES WITHIN
THE MED (MEDICAL) ZONING DISTRICT, AND
AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (CURS):
CHAPTER 901, DEFINITIONS: CHAPTER 911, ZONING;
CHAPTER 912, SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:
CHAPTER 913, SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS: CHAPTER
917, ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES: CHAPTER
934, EXCAVATION AND MMING: CHAPTM952,
TRAFFIC: AND CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS FOR
SPECIFIC LAND USE CRITERIA
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 26, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
�. I
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: April 26, 1999
SUBJECT: Final Hearing on Proposed Land. Development Regulation (LDR) Amendments
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 4, 1999.
At its special meeting of April 19, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners considered twelve
proposed Land Development Regulation (LDR) amendments (see attachment #1). At that meeting,
the Board directed staff to make a few changes to the home proposed occupations amendment.
Those changes have been made and are reflected in the attached ordinance. The consensus on the
remainder of the amendments was for approval. Therefore, no substantive changes have been made
to the other proposed amendments.
The Board is now to take final action and approve, approve with modifications, or deny the proposed
ordinance.
MAY 49 1999
•
-27- BOOK D 0, rAGE
BOOK 100 FgG �,lu
The twelve proposed amendments considered by the Board at its April 19th special meeting, which
are included in the proposed ordinance, are as follows:
1. Murphy Deed Reservations
2. Right-of-way Table
3. Building -front Walkway Venders
4. Distinguishing Piers from Docks
5. Height of Buildings: Multiple Roof Structures and Roof Peaks
6. Half -Streets
7. Gated Entrances
S. Exception to Littoral Zone Requirements
9,- Prohibition of Special Needs Development in Coastal High Hazard Area
10. Home Occupations
11. Private Access Road Frontage
12. Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements Update
Minor changes have been made to the April 19m version of the proposed ordinance in regard to
correcting typographical errors and placing the lengthy Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements Update
at the end of the ordinance document. For that reason, items 9-12 have been reordered Also, the
end of the ordinance has been formatted so as to reflect "split votes" on the building height and home
occupations proposals.
The only substantive change made from the April 191 ordinance version is in regard to home
occupations. A specific proposed prohibition of "... clients coming to the (home occupation)
premises..." has been deleted. Also, the Planning and Zoning Commission's proposed allowance
for 2 non-resident employees to park and meet at the home occupation premises has been deleted
In summary, the proposed home occupations regulations:
• Do not specifically prohibit client visits at the residence.
• Continue to prohibit "in person" wholesale and retail transactions at the residence (but allow
phone and internet transactions).
• Clearly prohibit non-resident employees from working at the residence.
• Allow for non-resident employees but only for activities that are off -premises.
• Retain the "level of activity" general standard that could possibly be used to prevent home
occupations from changing the residential character of the residence.
These changes and provisions reflect the Board's direction given at the April 19s' meeting.
As reported at the April 191 meeting, if the Board approves the Wabasso Corridor Plan
Requirements Update, then the official Wabasso Corridor Plan will need to be revised accordingly.
Also, as reported at the April 19s' meeting, the Board will need to finalize its approval of the
Wabasso Corridor Plan On-going Review Task Force member list (Tom Lowe, Ruth Meyers, Steve
Parsons, Mary Fredell, John Atz, Jeff Bass).
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Adopt the attached Land Development Regulation (LDR) amendment ordinance.
2. Modify the development requirements of the approved Wabasso Corridor Plan in accordance
with the approved LDR amendment, and authorize staff to issue a revised and updated
Wabasso Corridor Plan.
3. Appoint the following individuals to the Wabasso Corridor Plan On-going Review Task
Force:
Tom Lowe
Ruth Meyers
Steve Parsons
Mary Fredell
John Atz
Jeff Bass
MAY 411999
-28-
1
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the amendments and discussed the changes
which had been directed by the Board at the meeting of April 19, 1999. The most discussion
at that meeting was regarding "home occupations" and "building height". The directions to
staff at that time have been incorporated into the revised Ordinance.
Commissioner Stanbridge asked for some comment on No 4, Distinguishing Piers
from Docks, as she believed this will open a Pandora's Box.
Director Boling commented that only a definition is being added as the current code
does not have a definition for a private pier which is not to be used as dock, but just for
observation and swimming. These piers would not require all the regulations of a dock but
would allow for waterfront owners to have a private pier.
Commissioner Stanbridge asked whether this had been a site specific request, and
Director Boling responded that the discussion had been prompted by the development at
Grand Harbor where residents had requested private piers, not for the purpose of mooring
water craft. This will be a county -wide regulation and will allow only private piers, but no
boat traffic.
Chairman Macht felt it was naive to believe private piers would not be used for docks
sooner or later.
Chief of Environmental Planning Roland DeBlois commented that Grand Harbor is
just one example. These fishing piers could also be allowed in subdivisions with interior
lakes where boat traffic is prohibited. Environmental Planning is satisfied with the
regulations and the Department of Environmental Protection has specific criteria for the
construction of these piers.
Commissioner Adams suggested that the language be changed to indicate that piers
could only be designed and permitted over "privately owned submerged lands".
Chairman Macht wanted the record to reflect that he had a telephone call yesterday
regarding home occupations and had advised the caller that the item was not on the agenda
today. He apologized and noted that he had not realized the caller was referring to this
particular item.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #1, Murphy Deed Reservations. There being none, the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
MAY 4, 1999
-29-
Boor UC 171
BOOK
a` F.1Ge
6
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #2, Right -of -Way Table. There being none, the Chairman closed the public
hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #3, Building -front Walkway Vendors. There being none, the Chairman
closed the public hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #4, Distinguishing Piers from Docks.
Jens Tripson, Pelican Island Audubon Society, felt the item should be made more
specific. He felt there would be no problem with landlocked lakes having such piers, but had
a real problem with such uses in the Indian River Lagoon. If anyone wanted to build a pier
into the Lagoon bordering Pelican Island, his society would stand in the way any way they
could. The Society is totally opposed to allowing piers in the Lagoon.
Walt Stieglitz, Pelican Island Preservation Society, felt there would be potentially
significant environmental consequences if these are allowed county -wide. He had no
problem with allowing them in artificial lakes but believed the Lagoon would encounter
major problems. He also felt piers would be extremely difficult to enforce and that they
would eventually have boats docking at them. He urged the Board to vote against the item.
Robert Fisher, Jr., 5150 St. Andrews Island Court, clarified that he is simply looking
for an observation pier at Grand Harbor. He has no intent to moor boats there. He also
commented that he has a letter from Grand Harbor Property Owners Association stating they
have no objection to this observation deck.
MAY 49 1999
Jeff Meade, 1932 Tamara Trail, a marine contractor, stated that state regulations do
differentiate between piers and docks and piers cannot be used for boat mooring. He has
never seen a boat used at one of these structures and Mr. Fisher only wants to fish, observe
the wildlife, and enjoy the beauty of the river. He believed that not allowing such piers
would be discriminating against someone who is trying to do the right thing. He believes
very strongly in protecting the environment and Pelican Island Refuge.
George Kulzicki, 155 McKee Lane, asked how the county will'address future
projects.
Community Development Director Bob Keating stated that dock permits have been
issued in the past when the state has considered the structure to be a pier. The Development
Order of Grand Harbor prohibits these structures and the current pier definition states that
these are only structures to be used by the public.
After further discussion, Commissioner Adams believed that rather than just
redefining the definition of "piers", this action would effectively allow a practice that has not
previously been allowed.
Commissioner Ginn felt the item should be sent back to staff for revision and
additional definitions.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO SEND THE ITEM BACK TO STAFF FOR
REVISION.
After determining that no one else wished to be heard with regard to this item, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #5, Height of Buildings: Multiple Roof Structures and Roof Peaks.
Stephen Bischoff, 985 Reef Road, believed the eave should be used as the 35 foot
maximum, with a 15 -foot rise in pitch based on the crown of the road.
Director Boling responded that the starting point will be at the natural or required
elevation. The definition starts with "average natural grade".
MAY 49 1999
•
DO
-31- BOOK � Pr�U`E i73
I
BOOK ^g PAGEJ 14
Chloe Baxter, 980 Lantern Lane, showed pictures of a house across the street from
hers. She built her house in 1976 and the people across the street tore down the existing
house when they bought the property. She asked one of the workmen how high the roof was
and was told that it was 55 feet. In the late 1970s, a group from Miami came to the area and
wanted to build a high-rise on the river side. She and some of her neighbors told them they
could not build a high-rise in this County. She believed that the Code is over the head of
most of the public and feared that houses such as that in the picture could happen on the
ocean -side or in Orchid Island which could barricade the ocean from everybody.
Bill Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, President of North Beach Civic Association,
believed that sight pollution is as bad as water and air pollution. He felt that building houses
wider, not higher, would be an answer. He believed the cap should be 40 feet, 35 feet to
build and 5 feet for the roof.
Ruth Livingston, 1576 Smugglers Cove, agreed with putting a cap on the height.
After further discussion, Commissioner Ginn stated she would like to see a cap at 35
feet to the eave, with the roof not extending beyond 15 feet.
After determining that no one else wished to be heard with regard to this item, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ginn directed staff to bring back an absolute cap at 50 feet, with the
absolute cap for the eave at 35 feet.
Commissioner Adams felt she would be satisfied with a 50 foot maximum.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO RETURN THE ITEM TO STAFF FOR
REVISION.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #6, Half -Streets.
Pete Robinson, President of Laurel Homes, stated that the result of a prior request of
his to have a half -street opened was that the Board voted to close it rather than buy it. He
suggested that perhaps the Board should decide which of the current half -streets they want
and buy them now, rather than after they are developed when they will be more expensive.
MAY 4, 1999
After determining that no one else wished to be heard with regard to this item, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #7, Gated Entrances. There being none, the Chairman closed the public
hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #8, Exception to Littoral Zone Requirements. There being none, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #9, Prohibition of Special Needs Development in Coastal High Hazard
Area. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #10, Home Occupations.
Pete Robinson, President of Laurel Homes, felt that new garage businesses will have
great difficulty starting up if there is a limitation on parking and wondered if housekeepers
or groundskeepers would be included.
Chairman Macht noted that those categories would be independent contractors rather
than employees of a home occupation.
MAY 49 1999
-33-
BOOK FAG -c
Fr-
BOOK 109 PAUE 1 7 6
Renee Renzi, 340 Waverly Place, questioned babysitting services in your home, and
Director Boling responded that keeping fewer than 5 children is simply classified as a single-
family home.
Commissioner Tippin recommended the revision of Item 10 by adding to Paragraph
D,5: "In such cases, no more than two non-resident employees shall be allowed to park their
vehicles or meet on the home occupation premises."
After determining that no one else wished to be heard with regard to this item, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS AMENDED.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item # 11, Private Access Road Frontage. There being none, the Chairman closed
the public hearing.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
regard to Item #12, Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements Update.
Commissioner Ginn mentioned that there are continuing problems with a gas station
at US#1 and 510.
Bill Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, representing the North Beach Civic Association,
congratulated Stan Boling and staff on a wonderful job.
Director Boling felt that lighting standards in the building code would address the
types of problems referred to by Commissioner Ginn.
Discussion ensued regarding the attempt to retain the old Florida fishing village look
of the community.
Commissioner Adams questioned whether a public meeting had been scheduled with
the residents of Wabasso and, upon being advised that had not been done, recommended that
a public meeting be held to get the residents' feedback.
CONSENSUS WAS REACHED TO HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING AND HAVE
STAFF BRING BACK RECOMIlVIENDATIONS.
After determining that no one else wished to be heard with regard to this item, the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
MAY 49 1999
-0 34-
•
ON MOTION made by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Grin, the Board
unanimously agreed to send Item 4, Distinguishing
Piers from Docks and Item 5, Height of Buildings:
Multiple Roof Structures and Roof Peaks back to
staff for revision pursuant to directions given to
MR
ON MOTION made by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously agreed to: (1) revise Item 10, Home
Occupations, by adding to Paragraph D,5: "In such
cases, no more than two non-resident employees
shall be allowed to park their vehicles or meet on the
home occupation premises."; and (2) directed staffto
revise Item 12, Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements
Update and hold a public workshop to get further
input from citizens regarding this proposed Plan
Update.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously appointed Tom Lowe, Ruth Meyers,
Steve Parsons, Mary Fredell, John Atz, and JeffBass
to the Wabasso Corridor Plan Ongoing Review Task
Force; and adopted Ordinance 99-013 amending the
Land Development Regulations (LDRs) changing the
list of permitted uses within the MED (Medical)
Zoning District, and amending the following
chapters of the Land Development Regulations
(LDRs): Chapter 901, Defmitions; Chapter 911,
Zoning; Chapter 912, Single -Family Development;
Chapter 913, Subdivisions and Plats; Chapter 917,
Accessory Uses and Structures; Chapter 934,
Excavation and Mining; Chapter 952, Traffic, and
Chapter 971, Regulations for Specific Land Use
Criteria.
MAY 49 1999
LJ
-35-
Boa PACE 177
FF- I
BOOK J9 FAvEw
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 13
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHANGING THE LIST OF
PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE MED (MEDICAL) ZONING DISTRICT, AND
AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 901, DEFINITIONS; CHAPTER 911,
ZONING; CHAPTER 912, SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, CHAPTER 913,
SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS; CHAPTER 917, ACCESSORY USES AND
STRUCTURES; CHAPTER 934, EXCAVATION AND MINING; CHAPTER 952,
TRAFFIC; AND CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USE
CRITERIA; AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS,
CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS) BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Murphy Deed Reservations: definitions and setback requirements relating to Murphy
Deed Reservations.
The following definitions of Chapter 901 are hereby modified or established as follows:
=4- I . 1 ..J �.._2
2. Right -of -Way: a strip of land dedicated, deeded, used, or to be used for a street,
alley, walkway, boulevard, utility installations, drainage facility, access for ingress or egress, or other
purpose by the public, certain designated individuals, or governing bodies. Includes Murphy Deed
Reservations.
3. Setback: the minimum horizontal distance between the front, rear or side lines of
the lot and the front, rear or side lines of the building including porches, carports, and accessory uses
subject to yard encroachment provisions of Chapter 911, Zoning. Howevm front yard setbacks shall
be measured from the ri t -of- y line. which includes MuMby Deed Reservations For flag lots,
the front yard setback shall be measured from the line where the majority of the lot area meets the
narrow strip of land that connects the lot to the road right-of-way.
4. Yard front: on interior lots the yard being the minimum horizontal distance
between the structure and the street right-of-way or Mwhy Deed Reservation line. On multi -
frontage lots (including corner lots) all yards which abut a street right-of-way or Murphy Deed
Reservation are considered front yards, with the following exception:
For parcels adjacent to subdivision street rights-of-way, where the parcel is separated from
the subdivision street by landscape improvements required by the subdivision ordinance and
where the parcel cannot be accessed from the subdivision street, the portion of the parcel
adjacent to the right-of-way shall be treated as a side yard where a side yard would exist, and
a rear yard where a rear yard would exist, absent the right-of-way.
On double frontage lots having frontage on opposite sides of the lot or parcel, the yard
abutting the street with the lower functional classification as depicted on the county's
thoroughfare plan map shall be the front yard. If both streets have the same functional
classification, the yard adjacent to the front lot line having the shortest dimension shall be
the front yard.
Coding: Words in su*t-thwagh type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are
additions. 1
MAY 49 1999
0
2. Right -of -Way Table: revisions to right-of-way requirements table.
The appendix to Chapter 952 is hereby amended as follows:
SPECIFIC THOROUGHFARE PLAN ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TABLE
Facility
Thoroughfare
Additional
Plan Row
Intersection
Row
FROM:
TO:
SR AIA Brevard Co.
CR510
120
30'800'N. of
Line
CR510
SR AIA
CR510
Vero City Line
120
30'800'S. of
CR510
SR AIA
Vero City Line
SR60
120
30'800'N. of
Beachld Blvd.
SR AIA
SR 60
17th Street
120
30' 800' S'. of
Beachld Blvd.
SR AIA
17th Street
Vero City Line
120
800'S. & N. of
17th St.
SR AIA
Vero City Line
St. Lucie Co.
120
IRB
North US 1
SR 60
200
IRB
SR 60
S. US 1
200
150
I-95
Brevard Co.
St. Lucie Co.
300
Line
US 1
Brevard Co.
epcsio
+20
Sebastian City
Line
North Sebastian
Limits - 30' at
Cily Limits
120-160
CR 512 (500'
North & South)
160
Remaining
Unincorporated
- 20' at
Roseland Road
(500' North &
South)
MAY 49 1999
-37-
•
BOOK JUO PAGE �
BOOK M FADE J
US 1
C#S}$
North Sebastian
City Limits
53rd Street
4-2B
120-160
WabassoArea
30' at CR510
(500' South)
US 1
53rd St.
41st St.
160
20' at 41st St.
(500' South)
US 1
41st St.
SR 60
4-28
n
30' at 3r St.
(500 ` N. & S.)
Us-+
X60
38th Place
4$
US 1
SR 60
4th St.
120
US 1
4th St.
Oslo Road
160
US 1
Oslo Road
St. Lucie Co.
160
Roseld Rd.
US 1
0.6 mi. west
120
Roseld Rd.
0.6 mi. west
CR512
120
CR512
US 1
Roseland Rd.
200
CR512
Roseland Rd.
I-95
200
R/W to come
from N. side
CR512
1-95
Fellsmere
4-W
22
CR512
Fellsmere
SR 60
4%
zu
CR510
SR AIA
US 1
160
CR510
US 1
66th Ave
160
CR510
66th Ave
CR512
160
CR507
CR512
Brevard Co.
Line
80
SR 60
SR AIA
ICWW
130
SR 60
ICWW
Indian River
Blvd.
+39
L4Q
MAY 49 1999
-38-
U
C,
•
MAY 49 1999
eooK
-39-
SR 60
Indian River
20th Ave
140
Twin Pairs
Blvd.
SR 60
20th Ave
58th Ave
130
SR 60
58th Ave
82nd Ave
200
SR 60
82nd Ave
I-95
egg
2i4
SR 60
1-95
Osceola Co.
200
17th St.
SR AIA
Indian River
120
30' AIA and
Blvd.
IRB Inter. (800'
ea/side)
17th St.
Indian River
Old Dixie Hwy
120
30' at US 1
Blvd.
16th St.
Old Dixie Hwy.
27th Ave
86
20' at 20th Ave
144
16th St.
27th Ave
58th Ave
80
20' at 27th
Ave/43rd
Ave/58 Ave
16th St.
98th
102nd Ave
80
12th St.
Indian River
US 1
100
30' at IRB, US 1
Blvd.
12th St.
US 1
27th Ave
100
12th St.
27th Ave
58th Ave
100
Old Dixie
SR 60
4th St.
80
20' at 16th St,
12th St, 8th St,
4th St.
Old Dixie
4th St.
Oslo Rd.
80
20' at Oslo
Road
Old Dixie
Oslo Road
St. Lucie Co.
80
Old Dixie 38th Lane
966
80
20' at 69th St.,
410 Street
CR 510
53rd St., 45th
St., 41 st St.
MAY 49 1999
eooK
-39-
BOOK 109 FACEiS
20th Ave
SR 60
12th Street
100
20' at 16th and
12th St.
20th Ave
12th St.
17th St. SW
80
20' at Oslo
Road
27th Ave
26th St.
Oslo Road
130
27th Ave
Oslo Road
St. Lucie Co.
130
Oslo Road
US 1
27th Ave
130
12' at 27th Ave
Oslo Road
27th Ave
82nd Ave
130
12' at 27th, 58th
Ave
43rd Ave
57th St.
SR 60
100
20' at 53rd St.
43rd Ave
SR 60
8th St.
100
20' at SR 60,
16th St, 12th St.
43rd Ave
8th St.
Oslo Road
100
20' at Oslo
Road
43rd Ave
Oslo Road
St. Lucie Co.
100
58th Ave
CR510
33rd St.
130
58th Ave
33rd St.
16th St.
130
58th Ave
16th St.
21st St. SW
130
66th Ave
CR510
53rd St.
136
66th Ave
53rd St.
SR 60
136
66th Ave
SR 60
21st St. SW
136
74th Ave
CR510
SR 60
88
13Q
20' CR510, 53rd
St., SR 60
74th Ave
SR 60
21st St. SW
Be
m
20' at Oslo
Road
82nd Ave
CR 510
SR 60
136
82nd Ave
SR 60
Oslo Road
136
MAY 49 1999
-40-
-I
90th Ave
26th St.
Oslo Road
80
56' at SR 60
98th Ave
SR 60
Oslo Road
136
73rd St.
82nd Ave
58th Ave
$g
20
69th St.
82nd Ave
US 1
100
65th St.
82nd Ave
US 1
80
61st St.
82nd Ave
58th Ave
$g
20
57th St.
82nd Ave
US 1
80
53rd St.
I-95
US 1
}f0
20
49th St.
82nd Ave
US 1
80
45th St.
82nd Ave
Indian River
Blvd.
80
w i s[ moi.
Sind Ave
Indian River
100
Blvd.
37th St.
82nd Ave
58th Ave
so
24
37th St.
US 1
Indian River
110
Blvd.
33rd St.
82nd Ave
58th Ave
so
20
26th St.
90th Ave
27th Ave
80
16th St.
90th Ave
59th Ave
Be
20
12th St.
90th Ave
58th Ave
}36
140
12th St.
58th Ave
Indian River
100
36' at IRB, US
Blvd.
1; 16' at 27th
Ave, 43rd Ave,
58th Ave
8th St. 90th Ave Indian River 80
Blvd.
4th St. 98th Ave 58th Ave }36
im
MAY 49 1999
-41-
OOK a ��.^�
_I
BOOK 109 P'%1E13/
4th St.
58th Ave
US 1
100
36' at US 1; 16'
at 27th Ave,
43rd Ave, 58th
Ave
1 st St. S W
98th Ave
20th Ave
$o
20
5th St. SW
98th Ave
Old Dixie Hwy
80
13th St. SW
82nd Ave
Old Dixie Hwy
$$
2a
17th St. SW
82nd Ave
Old Dixie Hwy
100
21st St. SW
74th Ave
27th Ave
N
24
3. Building -front Walkway Vendors at Large -Scale Retail Projects
4. Half -Streets
Amend subdivision ordinance section 913.09(3)(C)6., to read as follows:
°6. Half -streets. The creation of half -streets is prohibited except where a previously
platted half -street abuts the subject tract in which case the unplatted one-half street
shall be created, or except where the public works and community development
directors determine that a half street area is required to be created to project an
existing right-of-way alignment to an adjacent property to allow for the future
development.
MAY 4, 1999
-42-
• •
5. Gated Entrances
Create traffic access control section 952.12(10), to read as follows:
��� " ! ![': i Y. -. 1 .v. �..•u�fls !J!J 11.i.!
1140 R o R 1 _ z.1,�:.s��><2!l11i11T7}4R{311Y•11lnt IV
er(NM Vol
6. Exception to Littoral Zone Requirements
Amend Section 934.05, to read as follows:
"Sec. 934.05 Water Management Standards.
Any excavation or mining activity in the unincorporated county which results in the creation or
Any
of a waterbody (as defined in Chapter 901) greater than one half acre in size shall be
subject to the following standards, except as specifically exemptedThe in Section 934.04 of this chapter.
Bions of ; emotion all not appy to created or exnanoea water��,e, or .}.,
�?p Ln_ cases where tie st _Tohns River Water M_ nagement Dic+Tct h .
does not require littoral zone(1 due to nerrr�anent �g•�urisdiction a=d
�--,. tt4o1 vol �rr+P dec;en or ocher oe�g�a�eters
(1) A littoral zone(s) shall be established as part of the created waterbody. A design and
management plan must be submitted which shall:
(a) Include a topographic map of the proposed littoral zone(s) showing
the control elevation contour and the minus two -and -one -half -foot (2
%s) control water elevation contour, and include a cross-sectional
MAY 49 1999
-43- BOOK i0J FAGd,85
p
ffilT
} 1
fJ
L The Public Works
swine Area) to encroach
Director or his esignee
in
Ma
Mmve
it
Maration of
bs-gate
and
flie
Adjacent
SO
3= intersectio
feet from the gille to
ial
the nearest
to the
d6t-of,
12rqject.
above mU 1i !! •l1 .!. '1�
based on altern
)n distances MQui
1 .-! , ♦ • , ,
;_.
d
1
under
ii -"
de
• Y.
iii
er(NM Vol
6. Exception to Littoral Zone Requirements
Amend Section 934.05, to read as follows:
"Sec. 934.05 Water Management Standards.
Any excavation or mining activity in the unincorporated county which results in the creation or
Any
of a waterbody (as defined in Chapter 901) greater than one half acre in size shall be
subject to the following standards, except as specifically exemptedThe in Section 934.04 of this chapter.
Bions of ; emotion all not appy to created or exnanoea water��,e, or .}.,
�?p Ln_ cases where tie st _Tohns River Water M_ nagement Dic+Tct h .
does not require littoral zone(1 due to nerrr�anent �g•�urisdiction a=d
�--,. tt4o1 vol �rr+P dec;en or ocher oe�g�a�eters
(1) A littoral zone(s) shall be established as part of the created waterbody. A design and
management plan must be submitted which shall:
(a) Include a topographic map of the proposed littoral zone(s) showing
the control elevation contour and the minus two -and -one -half -foot (2
%s) control water elevation contour, and include a cross-sectional
MAY 49 1999
-43- BOOK i0J FAGd,85
I
BOOK 109 PAGE 18 F
view of the littoral zone(s) planting design, showing the required
slopes from the top of the bank to a depth of two and one-half (2 %s)
feet below the control water elevation;
(b) Specify how vegetation is to be established, including the extent,
method, type and timing of any planting provided;
(c) Provide a description of any water management procedures to be
followed in order to ensure the continued viability and health of the
littoral zones;
(d) Include a plan view which documents the location and extent of the
littoral zones, including the percentage of the waterbody surface area
(at control elevation) covered by vegetated littoral zones.
(2) The established littoral zones shall consist of native vegetation, and shall be
maintained permanently as part of the waterbody. All landscaping, littoral zone
revegetation plans and lake management plans shall comply with St. John River
Water Management District rules.
(3) Within extended littoral zone shelves (at the landward base of the littoral zone side
slopes), the applicant is required to provide a minimum of one tree for every five
hundred (500) square feet of littoral zone coverage. The proposed trees must be a
minimum size consistent with Florida Division of Forestry seedlings (ten (10) inches
tall at planting depth) and consist of native, freshwater wetland varieties (e.g. red
bay, red maple, bald cypress).
(4) The slopes of the waterbody areas from top of bank to the littoral zone area shall not exceed
one (1) foot vertical to three (3) feet horizontal. Littoral zones and extended littoral zone
shelves shall be located within an area bounded by a landward limit of one (1) foot above the
control water elevation and a waterward limit of two and one-half (2 %:) feet to four (4) feet
below the control water elevation. At least thirty (30) percent of the waterbody surface area,
or 21 square feet per linear foot of shoreline, whichever is less, shall consist of a littoral zone.
The thirty percent is calculated based on the ratio of vegetated littoral zone to surface area
of the waterbody at the control elevation. Within the planted littoral zone(s) area(s), the
littoral zone slope shall not be steeper than an average slope of one (1) foot vertical to six (6)
feet horizontal, and the littoral zone need not be established in a continuous band around the
waterbody. Although no minimum slope below the littoral zone is required, the slope below
the littoral zone shall be constructed so that natural soil movement will not reduce the littoral
zone area.
(5) There will be no significant adverse off-site impact on groundwater quality or
groundwater levels. In the event of dewatering associated with excavations
(including mining), the applicant shall present evidence that no salt -water intrusion
and/or reduction in quality or quantity of well water available to properties within
one-fourth (1/4) mile of the permitted activity will occur.
(6) The water management system, including swales and interconnected wetlands and
lakes, must be specifically designed to inhibit siltation and eutrophication processes.
To ensure this, the applicant must submit an environmental management and lake
monitoring plan, specifying the method for monitoring the system and corrective
actions should eutrophication and/or siltation occur.
(7) A fifteen foot -wide access maintenance easement shall be provided for every one
thousand (1,000) feet of shoreline. This easement shall extend from below control
elevation of the lake to a public or private road right-of-way.
(8) The littoral zone will be considered as full credit towards the 2:1 mitigation ratio for
freshwater emergent wetlands; (ref. Chapter 928, Wetland and Deepwater Habitat
Protection.)"
MAY 49 1999
7. Prohibition of Special Needs Development in Coastal High hazard Area
A. Amend a portion of the 911.10(4) use table, as follows:
B. Amend section 971.28(4), to read as follows:
"(4) Homes for the aged, including nursing homes, rest homes, convalescent homes,
intermediate care facilities, and continuing care facilities (administrative permit and
special exception).
Y!� K! -- •.1 : �.!! _l. 7!•4 ! - 1 �1l/..! _!f.Y._c_f 1 • 1M 11 1
OX -a) Districts requiring special exception approval, (pursuant to the
provisions of 971.05): CL CO.
(s)(b) Additional information requirements:
A site plan, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 914.
2. A license issued by the State of Florida, pursuant to Chapter
400 of the Florida Statutes.
W)(e) Criteria for nursing homes, rest homes, convalescent homes and
homes for the aged.
1. All such facilities shall be located near a collector or arterial
roadway;
2. Type "D" buffering shall be required along the perimeter
boundaries ofthe site. Along boundaries where more intense
buffering is required, the more intense buffering requirements
shall apply.
3. Adult congregate living facilities nursing homes homes for the aged- total
care facilities groan homes. and similar -developments shall not be located
in the Coastal High Hazard re.:."
C. Amend section 971.28(3), specific land use criteria for group homes and adult living
facilities in residential and commercial districts, to add subsection 971.28(3)(f), to
read as follows:
R!� i. 1. IIJ{"•.. I.1_ _� 1'I- l.�h71'.1 •.11. 1•.112 1. .1_ M-1-
.. ! / • 4.. Wil! : _l"..4.
8. Home Occupations
Amend section 912.05(6), to read as follows:
(6) Home occupations
(A) Authorizations. Home occupations are permitted in any dwelling unit subject to the
Wowing provisions:
MAY 49 1999 BOCK
-45-
PRO
OCR
MED
CN
CL
CO
CH
Homes for aged, including nursing homes
and rest homes.
-
-
P A
-
S
S
B. Amend section 971.28(4), to read as follows:
"(4) Homes for the aged, including nursing homes, rest homes, convalescent homes,
intermediate care facilities, and continuing care facilities (administrative permit and
special exception).
Y!� K! -- •.1 : �.!! _l. 7!•4 ! - 1 �1l/..! _!f.Y._c_f 1 • 1M 11 1
OX -a) Districts requiring special exception approval, (pursuant to the
provisions of 971.05): CL CO.
(s)(b) Additional information requirements:
A site plan, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 914.
2. A license issued by the State of Florida, pursuant to Chapter
400 of the Florida Statutes.
W)(e) Criteria for nursing homes, rest homes, convalescent homes and
homes for the aged.
1. All such facilities shall be located near a collector or arterial
roadway;
2. Type "D" buffering shall be required along the perimeter
boundaries ofthe site. Along boundaries where more intense
buffering is required, the more intense buffering requirements
shall apply.
3. Adult congregate living facilities nursing homes homes for the aged- total
care facilities groan homes. and similar -developments shall not be located
in the Coastal High Hazard re.:."
C. Amend section 971.28(3), specific land use criteria for group homes and adult living
facilities in residential and commercial districts, to add subsection 971.28(3)(f), to
read as follows:
R!� i. 1. IIJ{"•.. I.1_ _� 1'I- l.�h71'.1 •.11. 1•.112 1. .1_ M-1-
.. ! / • 4.. Wil! : _l"..4.
8. Home Occupations
Amend section 912.05(6), to read as follows:
(6) Home occupations
(A) Authorizations. Home occupations are permitted in any dwelling unit subject to the
Wowing provisions:
MAY 49 1999 BOCK
-45-
r
BOCK fP Ut . J
(B) Authorized home occupations. The following home occupations shall be permitted
uses, subject to the requirements of this section and the respective zoning district.
1. Artists and sculptors;
2. Authors and composers;
3. Dressmakers, seamstresses and tailors;
4. Computer programming;
5. Home crafts, such as model making, rug weaving, lapidary work, and
ceramics;
6. Office facility of a minister, rabbi, priest or other similar person associated
with a religious organization;
7. Office facility of a salesman, sales representative, or manufacturers
representative, provided that no retail in p=n or wholesale transactions are
made on the premises, and that no clients are attracted to the premises;
8. Telephone answering services;
9. The renting of not more than one room for rooming or boarding persons who
are not transients;
10. Similar uses which do not involve in =on retail or wholesale sales
transactions on the premises, employment of persons on the premises other
than occupants of the dwelling, and any mass production assembly,
processing, or fabrication operations.
(C) Non -authorized home occupations. The following are not permissible home
occupations:
1. Automotiveaepair or paint shops;
2. Barber shops and beauty shops;
3. Child care centers;
4. Dog grooming services;
5. Food service establishments;
6. Funeral chapels, funeral homes;
7. Giftshops;
8. Massage parlors;
9. Nursing homes;
10. Medical or dental laboratories;
11. Outdoor repair,
12. Rental of any equipment or other items;
13. Restaurants;
14. Veterinary hospitals and clinics;
15. Similar uses not strictly in compliance with this section and the spirit and
intent of the zoning ordinance and the Indian River County Comprehensive
Plan.
MAY 49 1999
-46-
U
(D) Use limitations. In addition to the regulations applicable in the zoning district in
which located, all home occupations shall be subject to the following limitations and
requirements.
1. Location. A home occupation shall be conducted within a dwelling which is
the bona fide residence of the principal practitioner or in any building
accessory thereto which is normally associated with a residential use.
2. Merchandise. No stock in trade shall be displayed or sold on the premises.
3. Exterior alterations. No alterations to the exterior appearance of the principal
residence or premises shall be made which change the character thereof as a
residence.
4. Outdoor display or storage. No outside display of goods or outside storage
of equipment or material used in the home occupation shall be permitted.
5. Employees. No persons other than
oetnpyirtg-sneh an occupant of the dwelling shall be allowed to work
employed on the premises. Non-resident employees may be employed under
the home occupation. but only for off -premise conduct of the home
occupation. In such cases. no more than two non-resident emaloyees shall
he allowed to park their vehicles or meet on the home occupation premises.
6. Level of activity. The use of the dwelling unit for the home occupation shall
be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its
occupants, and shall under no circumstances change the residential character
thereof.
7. 3raffrc/pParking. No traffic shall be generated by smit hotne occupation
rmighborhood, mid wry need far Parking generated by the conduct of such
home occupation shall be met off the street.
8. Equipment processes. No equipment or process shall be used in such home
occupations which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical
interference detectable to the normal senses off the premises. In the case of
electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates
visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the
premises.
9. Signs. No signs accessory to such home occupation shall be displayed except
as permitted or authorized by applicable county sign regulations.
10. Licenses, permits. A home occupation shall be subject to all applicable
licenses and permits.
(E) Application and fees. Any person desiring to establish a home occupation, as
authorized herein, shall submit an application for a home occupation permit to the
planning division. The application shall be on a form provided by the planning
division and shall include all information required for a complete application. All
such applications shall also be accompanied by a fee, as established by the board of
county commissioners. Applications shall be approved, approved with conditions, or
denied by the community development director.
(F) Appeal of community development director decisions. The community development
director's decision on a home occupation application may be appealed within ten (10)
working days of the date the decision is rendered. Any appeal may be made by an
applicant or affected party. Any valid appeal must be received in writing by the
planning division within ten (10) working days of the director's decision. The appeal
shall state what aspect of the decision is being appealed and the reasons for and
justification for the appeal with specific reference to the regulations and requirements
of this subsection. The appeal shall be heard by the planning and zoning commission.
Decisions of the planning and zoning commission may be appealed to the board of
county commissioners. The appeal process is also defined in Chapter 902 of the land
development regulations.
MAY 49 1999
-47- BOOK 109 FAGF
•
BOOK 109 FAGUE 1,90
9. Private Access Road Frontage
A. Amend section 913.060)(A),(B),and(c), to read as follows:
(1) Unlawful activity. It shall be unlawful and subject to the penalties provided herein for any
person to:
(A) Create a subdivision without first complying with the provisions of this chapter and
filing a plat approved by the board of county commissioners unless exempt under
section 913.06(2). The dividing of land into two (2) or more parcels without filing
a plat under the provisions of this chapter, where the land divided was the result of
a previous division of land into two (2) or more parcels which occurred after July 23,
1983, is prohibited.
(B) Divide property by any means for the purpose of sale or transfer of title unless each
of the resulting parcels has at least the minimum area and width requirements
prescribed by the zoning regulations and land use plan of Indian River County as
applied to the lots created, unless exempt under sections 913.06(2) or 913.09(6).
(C) Divide property after December 8, 1973 by any means where a resulting lot does not
have frontage on: a dedicated public right-of-way, private platted right-of-way
(street), or a roadway historically and currently maintained by the county, as
referenced on the county road grading map, of at least:
Sixty (60) continuous feet, unless exempted under section 913.06(2), or
unless the lot fronts upon a cul-de-sac or curve and meets the requirements
of section 913.09(6)(C), for properties located within the A-1, A-2, A-3, Con-
t, Con -3, RFD and RS -1 zoning districts;
2. The minimum lot width of the zoning district applicable to the lot(s) created
for properties located within zoning districts other than those referenced in
the above paragraph 1., unless exempted under section 913.06(2), or unless
the lot fronts upon a cul-de-sac or curve and meets the requirements of
section 913.09(6)(c).
Access, ingresstegress, or other easements shall not be deemed to constitute
a publicly dedicated road right-of-way unless previously dedicated to and
accepted by the county. Private access easements shall be considered "private
platted rights-of-way (street)" for purposes of this section, if-
a.
f
a. The physical roadway located within the easement (s) existed prior to
the county's road frontage requirement (December 8, 1973); -and. Thg
alignment of the physical roadway may be shifted from its 1973
location if the roadway remains in the same general location and
retains its 1.973 beginning and ending points: and
b. The physical roadway has a Rassable width for two-way traffic
meeting county local road standards (twenty (20) feet for single-
family development); and
C. A notarized letter_a�table to the County Attorneys office in regard
to form and legal sufficiency. from the person or entity responsible
for road maintenance is filed with the county and recorded in the
public records, indicating the person or entity responsible for
maintenance and the method of maintenance performed; and
d. The person(s) proposing the lot split files for and obtains
administrative approval from staff, verifying that requirements are
satisfied regarding private road right-of-way frontage.
Note: Parcels created between September 21, 1990 and December 4, 1991 are subject
to the sixty (60) contiguous feet (rather than a minimum lot width) frontage
requirement, regardless of the zoning district in which the property is located.
MAY 49 1999
1
B. Amend section 912.06(3)(C)2., to read as follows;
2. The minimum lot width of the zoning district applicable to the lot(s) created for properties
located within zoning districts other than those referenced in the above paragraph 1., unless
exempted under section 913.06(2), or unless the lot fronts upon a cul-de-sac or curve and
meets the requirements of section 913.09(6)(c).
Access, ingtesdegress, or other easements shall not be deemed to constitute
a publicly dedicated road right-of-way unless previously dedicated to and
accepted by the county. Private access easements shall be considered "private
platted rights-of-way (street)" for purposes of this section, if.-
a.
f:
a. The physical roadway located within the easement (s) existed prior to
the county's road frontage requirement (December 8, 1973. ng
alignment of the Dhyci�al r -o v"y—�y be chifted from itc 1973
IocaUon If the roadw�v re;nris i the same gen e:JQggfi_nn a
retains its 1973 beginning and ending.points anti
b. The physical roadway has a passable width forty traffic
meeting county local road standards (twenty (20) feet for single-
family development); and
C. A notarized letter. acceptable to rl, ro l++ty Attomevs ofiiw in rPggsg
to form and lega_1 sL=ffic�0 from the person or entity responsible
for road maintenance is filed with the county and recorded in the
public recordc- indicating the person or entity responsible for
maintenance and the method of maintenance performed; and
d. The person(s) proposing the lot split files for and obtains
administrative approval from staff, verifying that requirements are
satisfied regarding private road right-of-way frontage.
Note* E rce to the SiM 00) contigu2ils -
i.l
K )m1ber .1_! a t! _l_ !. _.!! l width) ftontage�-�._ich the =U9If l -L
10- REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All Previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed
o the extent of such conflict All Special Acts of the legislature applying only to the unincorporated
portion of Indian River County which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict.
11. CODIFICATION
The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the County Code and the word
"Ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of
this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions.
12. SEVERABILITY
If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holdings shall not affect the remaining
portions hereof and it shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to pass this ordinance
without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part.
13. EFFECTIVE DATE
State. The provisions of this ordinance spall become effective upon filing with the Department of
MAY 49 1999
-49-
BOOK i00 PAGE ir-d
I
BOOK FAGr I „+
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida on this 5 day of M a y
1999.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 10 day of
Agri 1 . 1999, and on the 7 6 day of A p r i l -1999, for public hearings
to be held on the 19 day of April 1999, and on the 4 day of
May . 1999 at which time at the final hearing it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Stanbridge , seconded by Commissioner G i nn
and adopted by the following vote;
The ordinance was adopted by a vote of :
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht A v e
Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A v e
Commissioner John W. Tippin Ay P
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By
eth R. Macht, Chairman
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this day of
.1999.
Effective Date: Filed with the Department of State on the day of ,1999.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
APPR VED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
obert M. Keating, AI
Community Developm D' r
MAY 49 1999
0 -50- 0
11.c. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH AND INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY MAIN LIBRARY - AMENDED JOINT
PARSING LOT AGREEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 26, 1999:
Date: April 26, 1999
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Directorl�tL664GL�-ate'"
Subject: Amended Joint Parldng Lot Agreement Between Baptist Church and Indian River
County (Main Library)
BACKGROUND:
On April 11, 1989, the First Baptist Church and the Board of County Commissioners entered into a joint
use agreement for a parking lot to be constructed on property owned by the First Baptist Church located
north of the Main Library. The approval of that agreement provided for adequate off-street parking to
accommodate the construction of the Maui Library at its present site.
In March, 1998, the County received a notice from Mr. T. G. Rogers, Chairman of the Board of Trustees,
that the Church wished to exercise its option to cancel the lease on April 11, 1999. The Church did leave
an option open in that notice to allow negotiate for some usage of the lot
Mr. Roger; provided the County with a list of items the Church would like to have considered for a new
lease in a letter addressed to Sonny Dean dated June 11, 1998. It was also determined, through the City
of Vero Beach, that adequate parldng existed with surplus parking in the garage structure for the
Courthouse if the existing shared parking was no longer available.
In late February, 1999, Mr. Rogers made contact with me shortly after my arrival, and indicated he was
timing the Chairmanship over to Phil Partee, the new Chairman of the Board of Trustees. After evaluating
the facts, I sent a memo dated March 5, 1999, to Mr. Partee outlining the situation as I perceived it
Ste, Mr. Partee sent me a response dated March 22, 1999, outlining their amended needs. After
reviewing those items and their fiscal impacts, I requested Mr. Terry O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney,
to draft a proposed amended agreement That document is the item of consideration by the Board
Subsequently the Board of Trustees indicated that they wished to have the proposed agreement submitted
to the membership of the Church. I then prepared a letter April 23, 1999, to the Church requesting some
additional consideration of Sunday evening hours. The crux of that proposal would give flexibility to the
County should it desire to maintain later hours on Sunday evenings provided the County take steps to
insure that the Church would have exclusive use during those extended hours.
ANALYSIS:
The Church membership on Sunday, April 25, 1999, accepted the agreement pursuant to the terms as
originally expressed by Mr. Phil Partee plus the additionally proposed language for extended hours on
Sunday if deemed desirable.
Mr. Partee's agreement calls for two items of direct costs, the installation of an additional fight at the
driveway entrance at 16th Avenue and the resurfiucing of the joint parking lot within the first five years of
the new ten year agreement The cost of the light is estimated to be approximately $700.00 and the cost
of the resurfacing of the parking lot would be estimated to be approximately $7,500 in the year 2004.
Additionally the County would agree to limit the hours of the library to those hours currently being used
and not open before 1:00 p.m. nor close later than 6:00 p.m. on Sundays, unless it were to provide for the
exclusive use of the parldng lot by the congregation for any usage after 6:00 p.m.
The amended agreement would be for a period of ten years and be subject to all other conditions of the
original agreement.
MAY 49 1999
-51- BOOK4
FP'
BOOK iii fnu ll' "iA"
Finally, an easement for joint usage of the vacated 22nd Street driveway would be included
Considering the convenience and the library patrons accustomed use of the north parking lot, this
amendment with its editions for a ten year renewal appears to be reasonable considering the parking lot
would probably need resurfacing within 15 years of its original date of surface application.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the acceptance of the amended agreement as approved and executed by the Baptist
Church, with authorization for the Chairman to execute the agreement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
accepted the Amendment to Agreement with First
Baptist Church of Vero Beach, Inc. for Shared
Parking and authorized the Chairman to execute
same, as recommended by staff.
AMENDMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.1. CR -512 (FELLSMERE ROAD) BRIDGE
REPLACEMENTS - DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACT WITH
ZEP CONSTRUCTION, INC. - PART H AGREEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 26, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Direct
SUBJECT: CR512 (Fellsmere Road) Bridge Replacements -
Design/Build Contract with Zep Construction, Inc.
Part II Agreement
DATE: April 26, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Contractor/Engineer for the CR512 Bridge Replacement projects
over Lateral "U" canal and Park Lateral Canal west of Fellsmere has
completed the Part 1 Agreement services under the Design/Build
Contract. A Preliminary Design Development Report has been
prepared which includes the following:
1. A recommended design of the bridges as follows:
Park Lateral Canal Bridge - AASHTO Type 3
precast prestressed beams with a single span
of 75'.
Lateral "U" Canal Bridge -Modified AASHTO Type
2 precast prestressed beams with a single span
of 56'.
MAY 49 1999
-52-
2. A maximum guaranteed cost of $805,000 for both bridges. This
includes bridge construction, engineering for roadway and
bridge design, plans, meetings, construction observation for
the bridge only, permit fees, material testing, test piles and
analysis, and removal of existing structures. The roadway
approaches are not included.
3. A completion schedule of September 15, 1999 to construct the
Park Lateral Canal Bridge and Nov. 30, 1999 for the Lateral
"II" Canal Bridge.
At this time, approval of the report is requested, and
authorization to proceed with Part II Design/Build Services is
requested. If approved, the Contractor/Engineer shall proceed with
Final Design, permitting, and construction.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The Public Works Department staff reviewed the original Preliminary
Design Development Report and has negotiated a few changes. The
initial report proposed a maximum guaranteed cost of $1,047,000,
which included approach roadway reconstruction. Staff's opinion
was that the cost was excessive. By the Road and Bridge Division
performing the roadway approach work and the Contractor
reconsidering, the cost was reduced to $805,000. Staff offers the
following alternatives:
Alternative # 1
Approve the Preliminary Design Development Report and
authorize execution of the Part II Agreement by the
Chairman.
Alternative #2
Deny approval and renegotiate.
RECOMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative #1 whereby the Preliminary Design
Development Report is approved and the Chairman is authorized to
execute the Part II agreement. Funding to be by Fund 109 - Gas Tax
Revenue.
ATTACiO�NT A/ ,BCS
Preliminary Design Development Report — /Cp,e
Part II Agreement
MAY 49 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously approved the Preliminary Design
Development Report and authorized execution of the
Part H Agreement with ZEP Construction, Inc., as
recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-53- BOOK U PAGE -1%
F,
•
BOOK iOj pg E
11.G.2. KINGS HIGHWAY (58TH AVENUE) IMPROVEMENTS -
CHANGE ORDER #3 - DICKERSON FLORIDA
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 27, 1999:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.EqC,
Public Works Directo
Donald R. Hubbs, P.E. M �: �1��, ld � 14..hb'
Director of Utility ServicesV
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.
Capital Projects Manag
SUBJECT: Kings Highway (581' Avenue) Improvements
Change Order No. 3
DATE: April 27, 1999
The contractor for 51P Avenue, Dickerson Florida, Inc. has completed approximately 95%
of the underground drainage and utility work The attached Change Order No. 3 resolves
utility conflicts that have been encountered to date. A detailed summary of drainage
revisions is attached as back up to the Change Order.
Change Order No. 3 includes drainage increases in the amount of $99,152.32 and
drainage deducts in the amount of $86,251.50 for a net increase of $12,900.82. Utility
revisions include increases in the amount of $16,165.03 and deducts in the amount of
$10,752.00 for a net increase of $5,413.03.
Change Order No. 3 also contains a list of miscellaneous increases and decreases to
bring actual quantities up to date. Credits include $59,243.25 for geogrid that was not
required, $3,208.64 for back charging the Capital Projects Inspectors overtime, and
$1,020.00 for density tests that had to be redone. Increases include $26,428.05 for
construction of a gravity retaining wall in front of the substation north of the Main Relief
Canal, $2,128.00 for a variable message sign at SR 60, $911.20 net change for concrete
barrier wall increases and deducts, and $3,000.00 to raise the elevation of the berm at
Kingswood one foot
Dickerson's schedule was seriously impacted as a result of lengthy negotiations at the
beginning of this project with regard to select fill. The select fill problem was resolved with
the issuance of Change Order No. 2, but the contract time was not addressed. Dickerson
estimates that they were delayed in excess of 120 days. Their contract schedule indicated
this resulted in a schedule delay of 100 days. Dickerson believes that they can make up
for approximately 35 days and have therefore requested a 65 day extension. This moves
their contract completion date from September 19, 1999 to November 30, 1999.
Staff recommends approval of the attached Change Order No. 3 which reduces the
contract in the amount of (44,512.57). This subtracted from the current contract amount
of $6,189,457.70, results in a new contract amount of $6,184,945.13.
The division of funding for Change Order No. 3 is as follows:
Roadway Construction (-$17,423.35)
109-214-541-067.31
Indian River County Utilities +$12,910.78
472-000-169-321.00
MAY 49 1999
-54-
_I
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved Change Order #3 with
Dickerson Florida, reducing the contract in the
amount of $4,512.57, resulting in a new contract
price of $6,184,945.13, as recommended by staff,
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.1. BID #9039 — CHERRYWOOD ESTATES SUBDIVISION
WATER MAIN PROJECT — FINAL PAYMENT AND
CHANGE ORDER #1— DRIVEWAYS, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 23, 1999:
DATE: APRIL 23,1999
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
(n
DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. �•/�
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S
PREPARED
MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E. ek
AND STAFFED
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY:
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: CHERRYWOOD ESTATES SUBDIVISION WATER MAIN PROJECT
FINAL PAYMENT AND APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -98 -05 -DS
WIP NO. 473-000-169-352.00
BID NO. 9039
BACKGROUND
On February 16, 1999, the Board of County Commissioner's awarded Bid No. 9039 to Driveways, Inc. (see
attached agenda item and minutes) in the amount of $40,948.94 to provide water service and fire protection
to the above -referenced project The project is now complete and the Department of Environmental
Protection has issued clearance to begin connecting customers. The Department of Utility Services is now
prepared to make final payment to the contractor.
ANALYSIS
The contractor was previously paid $32,204.11 for 79% of the project The contractor experienced extra
work and materials due to a deeper than anticipated existing water main used to tap the extension. The
added cost of Change Order No. 1 includes $1,442.40 for well pointing and $224.40 for materials related
with a valve extension, for a total of $1,666.80 (see attached copies of change order). This change order
results in a 4.1% increase to the originally apporved contract and adjusts the contract amount to $42,615.74.
Utilities staff is now requesting final payment in the amount of $10,411.63 to complete :he County's
$42,615.74 obligation to the contractor.
MAY 4s 1999
-55-
BOOK FAGE iV
F,
BOOK i00 FACE
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve Change Order No. 1, approve final payment in the amount of $10,411.63 to Driveways, Inc. and
authorize the Chairman to execute same, as presented.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved Change Order #1; approved
final payment in the amount of $10,411.63 to
Driveways, Inc.; and authorized the Chairman to
execute the documents, as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.2. BID #8065 - SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT PHASE
2A - FINAL PAYMENT AND APPROVAL OF CHANGE
ORDERS #1 AND #2 - DRIVEWAYS, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 23, 1999:
DATE: APRIL 23, 1999
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMIIVISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF U111,1fY SERVICES
PREPARED
MICHAEL C. HOTCHIQSS, P.E.
AND STAFFED
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY:
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT PHASE 2A
FINAL PAYMENT AND APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO'S. I & 2
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -96 -20 -DS
WIP NO. 475-000-169-324.00
BID NO. 8065
BACKGROUND
On August 11, 1998, the Board of County Commissioner's awarded Bid No. 8065 to Driveways, Inc. (see
attached agenda item and minutes) in the amount of $725,631.55 to provide water service and fire protection
to the above -referenced project. The project is now complete and the Department of Environmental
Protection has issued clearance to begin connecting customers. The Department of Utility Services is now
prepared to make final payment to the contractor.
ANALYSIS
The contractor was previously paid $603,399.27 for 83% of the project. The contractor experienced delays
in the contract due to rain days throughout the month of September, 1998. Change Order No. 1 revises the
contract time from 160 days to 185 days (see attached copies of change order). There were also
miscellaneous adjustments made to the amount of material used in the job (ie. number of services, amount
MAY 49 1999
of pipe fittings, etc.). Change Order No. 2 reduces the contract amount by $3,231.28 (see attached copies of
change order). This change order results in a 0.45% decrease to the originally apporved contract and adjusts
the contract amount to $722,400.27. Utilities staff is now requesting final payment in tl-- amount of
$119,001.00 to complete the County's $722,400.27 obligation to the contractor.
RECONDAENDATTON
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve Change Order No's. 1 and 2, approve final payment in the amount of $119,001.00 to Driveways,
Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute some, as presented
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved Change Orders #1 and #2
with Driveways, Inc.; approved final payment in the
amount of $119,001; and authorized the Chairman to
execute the documents, as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
D.A. CHAIRMAN KENNETH R MRCHT - PERSONAL
COMMENTS
The Board reviewed the following Memoranda:
tea"` Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
s . Vero Beach, Florida 32960 RECEIVED
'2oxtoA Telephone: (561) 567-8000
MAY 0 4 1999
MEMORANDUM CLERK TO THE BOARD
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman, County Commission /'ice')
SUBJECT: Surplus Property
As you aware, based on conversations with Chief Gabbard, the Sheriff conducted
an investigation into my alleged receipt of an old bunker coat (referred to in the
report as a mid-level fire suit) from the then -Fire Chief, Otis Humanis, with the
approval of the Chief of Emergency Services.
I requested from the Sheriff his investigative reports of the alleged incident. In
reviewing these reports, I note that Article 8 of the Administrative Manual,
concerning disposal of surplus property, is cited several times.
MAY 49 1999
-57-
0
I
BOOK x.09 1'AGE�,9
Under Article 8, "Fixed Assets" is the repository for excess or surplus property.
Would you please obtain for me the following information:
1. For the past 7 years, the number of old mid-level fire suits that have
been declared surplus or excess, and have been sent to Fixed Assets
for sale.
2. A copy of all final printouts that contain mid-level fire suits for sale.
3. The sale price of each old mid-level fire suit sold pursuant to Article 8.
4. The average active (use by a fire fighter) life of a mid-level fire suit.
In order to determine the potential universe of the number of old mid-level fire suits
that could have occurred during this 7 year period, please provide me with the
following information:
1. Using :1992 as the base year, the number of mid-level fire suits
considered necessary and the number of mid-level fire suits in
inventory.
2. The number of mid-level fire suits, year by year, that were purchased,
and the number of said suits considered necessary for each year.
3. The information requested above is not necessary if records establish,
on a year-to-year basis, the number of said suits that were removed
from active inventory.
Your cooperation in this matter, which could adversely reflect on County employees'
actions, as well as my own, is requested.
S!% r� _IVED
MAY 0 3 1999 r '�ners
j trF;or
vin
"._'.ait11SS10N INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ' '•'
MEMORANDUM
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrat4lfc Rn_,"
Ot�G V
FROM: Doug Wright, Director Emerg. Ss: Y
Emergency Services Risk Mgt.
Ctbar
DATE: .April 30, 1999
SUBJECT: Request from Commissioner Kenneth Macht - Surplus Property Information
The following information is my response to the above referenced memorandum regarding Surplus
Property which was requested by Commission Chairman Kenneth R. Macht on April 28, 1999.
L For the past 7 years, the number of old mid-level fire suits that have been declared surplus
or excess, and have been sent to Fixed Assets for sale.
Response: I am unsure of what is meant by the term mid-level or its origin. Protective
clothing for firefighters in this county is purchased as either bunker gear or
hazardous materials suits. Only Haz Mat•protective clothing is classified as an
A, B. or C level type. The response in either case is no bunker or haz mat suits
have been sent to Fixed Assets for surplus or sale.
2. A copy of all final printouts that contain mid-level fire suits for sale.
Response: None exist to my knowledge.
MAY 49 1999
-58-
•
3. The sale price of each old mid-level fire suit sold pursuant to Article 8
Response: Same response as stated in l and 2 above.
4. The average active (use by a fire fighter) life of a mid-level fire suit
Response: In the past, the disposition of old bunker gear has been treated as expendable
equipment rather than an asset: therefore it did not appear on the Division Fixed
Asset report. Bunker gear is budgeted and purchased from the 035.24 (Uniforms
and Clothing) account and is removed from service when it presents a safety
concern.
Due to exposures to heat. chemicals, jagged metal, broken glass, victim's body
fluids, air bome pathogens, and contact with people with contagious diseases.
a neve set of firefighting has a various service life. It has been our experience
that bunker coats can have a life from one day to roughly no more than three
years and a set of pants rarely last more than two years. For example, on April
28. 1999. we had to replace five sets of bunker gear, gloves, etc., subsequent to
a plane crash due to contact with impact and fire fatalities. This bunker gear
then becomes items that can not be sold (should not be sold) at surplus and has
to be disposed of properly since it is extremely contaminated and a health and
safety issue.
Page 2 - No. 1 Using 1992 as the base year, the number of mid-level fire suits considered
necessary and the number of mid-level fire suits in inventory.
Response: Between career and volunteer personnel, we have 154 sets, pants and coats
issued. Because each of these items are a special order item, we try to keep a
reasonable supply of replacement equipment on hand. Incidents, such as the
plane crash alluded to above, has an impact on the level of inventory. At the
present, we have 34 pants and 23 coats that are nearly new, most are the odd
sizes and all have been issued on an interim basis until fitted replacements could
be received from the vendor. We also have 26 pants and 33 coats which are
deemed to be in marginal condition meaning they are a last resort of the more
common sizes, having rips, tears, stains, and or other defects.
Between the nearly new and marginal garments, this quantity represents the
approximate number of replacement sets required to temporarily outfit one shift
who may have received a substantial exposure from a commercial type fire or
other significant event where chemicals, petroleum products, hazardous smoke,
contact with infectious/contagious individuals, or body fluids may have
contaminated most of the responders.
Those items that warrant being replaced or are of an exposure condition that
lends to liability for any future users are usually placed in the dumpster or "red
bagged" for biohazardous waster disposal, but given the existing policy, some
direction will have to be obtained given no exceptions are provided for in
existing policy.
Page 2 - No. 2 The number of mid-level fire suits, year by year, that were purchased, and the
number of said suits considered necessaryfor each year.
Response: The number of bunker items purchased since 1992 are as follows:
YEAR PANTS COATS
1992/93
28
32
1993/94
42
24
1994/95
44
26
1995/96
30
30
1996/97
35
29
1997/98
46
13
TOTAL
225
154
Page 2 - No. 3 The information requested above is not necessary if records establish, on a
year-to-year basis, the number of said suits that were removed from active
inventory.
Response: No response required.
MAY 4, 1999
-59- BOOK hO GAGE 2'
I
BOOK10- w,E2 2
Any replacement of bunker gear requires the review of a senior staff member and only three fire
personnel have access to the usable bunker gear storage area at this time, although in the past, unusable
bunker gear has been stored in the attic until it was disposed of by staff as expendable equipment.
Disposal records for the past seven years of our service bunker gear does not exist inasmuch as out of
service bunker gear has prior been treated as an expendable item and old equipment had to be turned
in to receive a replacement. Records have not been kept as to the exact date a coat or pair of pants was
removed from service or disposed of. Annually, employees are requested to submit a request for
replacement gear if there is an anticipated need. Staff generally makes one large order per year which
includes a number of spares.
I hope this provides sufficient information for your response to Commissioner Macht's request for
information. If not, please advise and I will promptly respond.
Chairman Macht commented that this has been a very distressing period and he felt
he owed the citizens an explanation of what is occurring. As the citizens are aware from
reading the newspaper, the Sheriff has filed a complaint. The underlying basis for the
inquiry is Chairman Macht's receipt of a firefighters jacket which he asked for in the fall of
1995 when he read that several were being surplused. These jackets make fine protective
wear when operating a kiln. At that time, he had asked Emergency Services Director Doug
Wright whether the jackets were discarded and he responded that they were. These jackets
are either put in a dumpster or retained by the firefighters. Chairman Macht had then
commented that, if that were the case, he would like to have one. Several months later, one
of the used jackets was made available. Sometime later, Chairman Macht built a kiln which
was donated to one of the schools. The newspaper then published a picture showing a
person in one of the used firefighter jackets and some people had assumed that person was
Chairman Macht, when they were actually pictures of students operating the kiln.
Chairman Macht stated that the jackets are very useful when operating the kiln. The
kilns reach a temperature of 2380o Fahrenheit and this protection is excellent. He noted that
he often donates ceramics to Samaritan Center, Pelican Island, Cultural Council, Humane
Society and others.
Chairman Macht then noted that when certain members of the Board objected to the
Sheriff's budget, the Sheriff began a campaign to unseat them, trying to get someone to run
against himself and Mrs. Adams.
Chairman Macht felt this is the latest attempt to neutralize and intimidate some of the
Commissioners and he has demanded documentation from the Sheriff, the State's Attorney
and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. He has been advised that information will
be supplied from the FDLE in about 10 days and then he will present a further report to the
public.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
MAY 49 1999
B.C. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE A GINN — COUNCIL OF
PUBLIC OFFICIALS — REDISTRICTING MEETING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 21, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
Council of Public Officials
DATE: April 21,1999
RE: REDI57RW777 4F MEETING
At the April 21, 1999. meeting of the Council of Public Officials, Donna Skinner,
representative from Indian River Memorial hospital, suggested that the Council
undertake a study of the redistricting issues which will affect our County after
the next census. The study would look at the district boundary lines of county
commissions, hospitals, schools, and other special districts.
I believe that this idea has merit and the Council of Public Officials is the ideal
forum to host such a discussion; therefore, I am asking the Board of County
Commissioners for its approval to authorize the Council of Public Officials to
consider the redistricting issue, possibly at its May, 1999 meeting.
Commissioner Ginn asked for permission to approve the study of the redistricting
issues by COPD, and CommissionerAdams requestedthatrecommendations be broughtback
to the Board in preparation for a public workshop.
MAY 49 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the study of the redistricting
issues by the Council of Public Officials, as
requested.
-61- Boor J J � F'',
BOOK J00 FAUc
U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 11:52 a.m.
ATTEST:
Minutes Approved: ftij5�
MAY 49 1999