Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/17/1999• MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY] FLORIDA A G E N D A TUESDAY, AUGUST 17,1999 - 9:00 A.M. County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 i COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS Kenneth R Macht, Chairman (District 3) Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman (District 1) Caroline D. Ginn, (District 5) Ruth Stanbridge (District 2 John W. Tippin, (District 4) James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP PAGES 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Caroline D. Ginn 4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 13.C.2. Beach Preservation - Federal Responsibility (Press Journal editorial) 9.A.1. Corrected Page 97 -Exhibit -B- DELETION: 98.2. Becky Diaz Request to Discuss Babe Ruth Baseball 5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Margaret "Elaine" Wood for her Dedicated Service to Indian River County Sheriff s Department 1 2. Presentation of 1999 EMS Administrator of the Year Award to EMS Chief Jim Judge by the President of the Florida Association of County Emergency Medical Services (memorandum dated August 6,1999) 2 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated July!29,1999) 3-14 B. Approval of Wan -ants (memorandum dated August 5, 1999) 15-23 C. Acceptance of Resignation of R Sayre White H from IRC Utilities Advisory Committee (memorandum received August 6, 1999) 24 D. Renewal of 800 MHZ Communications System Backbone Maintenance Contract (memorandum dated August 6,1999) .25-43 B�UK f,1GE �a�� • 9:05 A.M. BOOK JL ff{U6 d BACKUP 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES E. Termination of Tower Space Lease Agreement with PrimeCo Personal Communications (memorandum dated August 4,1999) 44-45 F. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Bermuda Club Planned Development (memorandum dated August 4,1999) 46-49 G. Approval of Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement for Phase IV of Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. Sand Mine . (memorandum dated August 6, 1999) 50-54 H. Amendment to Resolution No. 95-32 to Require the Signature of the Utility Director on Certain Assess- ment Lien Releases (memorandum dated July 28,1999) 55-57 I. Review and Consideration of Revised IRC Local Housing Assistance Plan (memorandum dated August 10, 1999) 58-66 J. Approval of the Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDP) Annual Report (1998-99) (memorandum dated August 9,1999) 67-88 K. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs (memorandum dated August 9, 1999) 89 L. Out -of -County Travel for Comm. Stanbridge Re: St. Johns River Steering Committee and American Heritage River Program (memorandum dated August 11, 1999) 90 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9...... PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Earring Point Groves Request for Abandon- ment of a Portion of 87' St. Right -of -Way in the Wabasso Area (Legislative) (memorandum dated August 11, 1999) 91-97 2. Consideration of the Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Com- prehensive Management Plan (Legislative) I (memorandum dated August 11, 1999) 98-184 B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Request from Lynne A. Larkin, Esq. to Discuss College Lane - IRCC Intrusion on Neighboring Properties (letter dated July 30, 1999) 2. Becky Diaz Request to Discuss Babe Ruth Baseball (no backup provided) 185-205 • BACKUP 9:05 A.M. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): PAGES C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 1. Notice of Public Hearing for August 24, 1999: Consider a request for approval of a transaction whereby Charter Communications Holding Co., LLC. would acquire the controlling interest in the parent company of Falcon Cable Media. Falcon Cable Media currently holds a franchise for the provision of CATV service in Indian River County. Interested parties will be invited to speak at this hearing. (memorandum dated August 10, 1999) 206 2. Cancellation of August 17, 1999 Public Hearing: Withdrawal of LDR Amendment Proposal from Ken Godfrey (memorandum dated August 10, 1999) 207-208 10. COUNTY ADMIMSTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development Appeal by Peter Sabonjohn of the Planning and Zoning Commission's Decision that the Oak Terrace Phase 2 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Approval and Land Develop- ment Permit Approval Had Expired (memorandum dated August 11, 1999) 209-226 B. Emergency Services Approval of the Expenditure of Remaining Funds in the FY 99 State and Local Assistance Agreement (SLA) Grant to Improve and expand the Emergency Manage- ment Program (memorandum dated August 10, 1999) 227-228 C. General Services 1. Surplus Lots - Fellsmere (memorandum dated August 11, 1999) 229-240 2. Custodial Contract Renewal (memorandum dated July 28, 1999) 241-243 D. Leisure Services Tee Time Reservation System Replacement (memorandum dated July 27, 1999) 244250 E. Office of Management and Budget None F. Personnel None G. Public Works 1. 41" and 45* Street Improvements US 1 to Indian River Boulevard Glace and Radcliff, Inc. Final Payment and Release of Retainage (memorandum dated August 9, 1999) 251-252 �r� BOOK 10 f'A,E 0 -I BOOK i10 PAGE 77 BACKUP 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): PAGES G. Public Works (cont'd.Z 2. As -Built Resolution & Assessment Roll for Paving and Drainage Improvements to 261h Street West of 66h Avenue to Village Green, Phase III (memorandum dated July 20, 1999) 253-259 3. Wabasso Causeway Park Improvements Project FDOT Grant and Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement (memorandum dated August 9, 1999) 260-270 4. South County Park - Phase Il (memorandum dated July 30, 1999) 271-288 5. Expansion of Roseland Road Street Lighting MSTU (memorandum dated August 4, 1999) 289-295 6. Additional Street Light within Gifford Street Lighting District _ (memorandum dated August 4, 1999) 296-299 H. Utilities Utility Billing - Contract for Services (memorandum dated August 10, 1999) 300-314 I. Human Services None 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Florida Highway Patrol - Return of Borrowed Radar Equipment (letter dated July 21, 1999) 315 B. Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams C. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn County Administration Building Advisory Comm. (no backup provided) D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge E. Commissioner John W. Tinain • 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS A. Emergency Services District 1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 7/20/99 15. 2. Approval toPurchasee Two Ford type III Super Duty E450 Ambulances from Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. for Station #8 and #11 Piggybacking the Town of Indian River Shores Bid and Funding Authorization (memorandum dated August 9, 1999) B. Solid WasIg Disposal District None C. Environmental Control Board None F-111Lq 0:�►1��i Ytl BACKUP PAGES 316-319 I Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times throughout the week Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening BOOK f,nu INDEX TO MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 1999 1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1 2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ................................... 1 5.A. PROCLAMATION - HONORING MARGARET "ELAINE" WOOD FOR HER DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ............ 2 5.B. PRESENTATION OF 1999 EMS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE YEAR AWARD TO EMS CHIEF JIM JUDGE ...................................... 2 6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ....................................... 3 7. CONSENT AGENDA .......................................... 3 7.A. Approval of Warrants 7.B. ...................................... Approval of Warrants 3 7.C. ..................................... Utilities Advisory Committee - Accept Resignation of K Sayre White Ii 12 7.D. ...................................................... Renewal of 800 MHZ Communications System Backbone Maintenance 19 Contract - Communications International, Inc ..................... 20 7.E. Termination of Tower Space Lease Agreement with PrimeCo Personal Communications 7.F. .......................................... Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Bermuda Club Planned 21 Development ............................................. 22 7.G. Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. Sand Mine Phase IV - Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement Approval ................................. 24 7.H. Resolution No. 99-079 - Amends Resolution No. 95-32 to Require the Signature of the Utility Director on Certain Assessment Lien Releases . 25 7.I. Review and Consideration of Revised Local Housing Assistance Plan (LHAP)......:.......................................... 26 7.J. Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDP) Annual Report (1998-1999) 7.K. Approval ................................................ Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs ..................... 31 33 7.L. Out -of -County Travel for Commissioner Stanbridge - St. Johns River Steering Committee and American Heritage River Program .......... 34 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 99-081- EARRING POINT GROVES REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF 87TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE WABASSO AREA (Legislative) .............. 35 1 BOOK 9 60DK .°` � PAGE 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MANATEE PROTECTION AND BOATING SAFETY COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Legislative)................................................... 42 9.13.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM LYNNE A. LARK IN, ESQ. TO DISCUSS COLLEGE LANE - IRCC INTRUSION ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES................................................. 50 9.13.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - BECKY DIAZ REQUEST TO DISCUSS BABE RUTH BASEBALL ............................................. 53 9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 24, 1999 - CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY LLC, FALCON CABLE MEDIA AND CABLE TV SERVICE IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.................................................... 53 9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - CANCELLATION OF AUGUST 17, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING - WITHDRAWAL OF LDR AMENDMENT PROPOSAL FROM KEN GODFREY (MINING ACTIVITIES) ........................... 54 1 LA. APPEAL BY PETER SABONJOHN OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S DECISION THAT THE OAK TERRACE PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVAL HAD EXPIRED ............... 55 11.13. EXPEND REMAINING FUNDS IN FY 1999 STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT (SLA) GRANT TO IMPROVE AND EXPAND THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WITH OPERATING AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ......................................... 61 11.C.1. CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF TWO SURPLUS LOTS IN FELLSMERE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER ............. 63 11.C.2. RENEWAL OF CUSTODIAL CONTRACT FOR CERTAIN COUNTY- OWNED OUNTYOWNED BUILDINGS - CLEAN NET ......................... 64 11.D. SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB TEE TIME RESERVATION SYSTEM - REPLACEMENT SOFTWARE - TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC.. 66 11.G.1. 41ST AND 45TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS - US#1 TO INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - GLACE AND RADCLIFF, INC. - FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE OF RETAINAGE .................. 67 11.G.2. RESOLUTION NO.99-082 - 26TH STREET (WALKER AVENUE) WEST OF 66TH AVENUE TO VILLAGE GREEN PHASE III - AS - BUILT RESOLUTION AND ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE - PROJECT NO. 8528 ........................... 68 11.G.3. WABASSO CAUSEWAY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GRANT AND MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ........... 75 0 11.G.4. SOUTH COUNTY PARK - PHASE II - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GRANT (FRDAP PROJECT F20023) ................................................. 76 11.G.5. EXPANSION OF ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING MSTU .. 77 11.G.6. ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHT - GIFFORD STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ............................................... 78 11.H. UTILITY SERVICES BILLING CONTRACT - NATIONAL BUSINESS PRODUCTS ............................................. 80 13.A. RETURN OF BORROWED RADAR EQUIPMENT BY FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL ...................................... 82 13.C.1. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADVISORY COMIVIITTEE - APPROVAL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CREATION .......... 84 13.C.2. BEACH PRESERVATION FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY (PRESS JOURNAL EDITORIAL) ................................... 85 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ............. ............ 86 3 L- BOOK ill f'AG-. 8 August 17, 1999 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, August 17, 1999. Present were Kenneth R Macht, Chairman, Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman; Caroline D. Ginn; Ruth Stanbridge; and John W. Tippin. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, CountyAttorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. L CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. INVOCATION Commissioner Ginn delivered the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Ginn led the Pledge to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Chairman Macht advised additional backup was provided for item 13.C. (now 13.C.1.) and requested the addition of item 13.C.2. Press Journal Editorial concerning Federal Responsibility for Beach Preservation. He further advised there was a corrected page 97, Exhibit `B" for item 9.A.1., Earring Point Groves Request for Abandonment of a Portion of 87 h Street Right -of -Way in the Wabasso Area. Administrator Chandler advised that item 9.B.2. was to be withdrawn. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously made the requested changes to the agenda. AUGUST 17, 1999 1 BOCK i'1PAGE 11 3 BOOK if 0 PAGE J 5.A. PROCLAMATION- HONORING MARGARET "ELAINE" W OOD FOR HER DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT The Chairman read the following and presented it during a standing ovation to "Elaine" Wood, who thanked the Commissioners. PROCLAMATION HONORING MARGARET "ELAINE" WOOD FOR HER DEDICATED SERVICE WHEREAS, Elaine began her career with the Indian River County Sheriffs Office on November 3, 1968; and WHEREAS, during her tenure, she worked as the Supervisor of Communications, Public Reception and Telephone Coordinator, and WHEREAS, Elaine was recognized for her loyalty and dedication by three Sheriff Administrations; and WHEREAS, Margaret "Elaine" Wood has spent most ofher life ensuring the safety and well- being of our citizens, and WHEREAS, her philosophy is to treat all people with honesty and respect; and WHEREAS, Elaine retired from service at the Indian River County Sheriffs Office on September 30, 1996: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAMM BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that MARGARET "ELAIINE" WOOD be honored for her exemplary service to this county and its citizens. Elaine has demonstrated impeccable personal standards of performance and is to be commended for her dedicated service. The Board wishes her well in her future endeavors. Dated this 17 day of August, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM MOVERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Z--,— "J'p,4e cl�' nneth R Macht, Chairman 5.B. PRESENTATION OF 1999 EMS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE YEAR AWARD TO EMS CHIEF JIM JUDGE Emergency Services Director Doug Wright introduced the presenter. Diane Flagg, EMS Chief of Collier County, President of the Florida Association of AUGUST 17, 1999 2 County Emergency Medical Services, was honored to present the 1999 EMS Administrator of the Year Award to EMS Chief Jim Judge. Chief Judge thanked Ms. Flagg for coming to make the presentation and expressed his appreciation to the Commissioners for their support and to others, including Emergency Services Director Doug Wright for his leadership, support, and guidance. Chairman Macht and Vice Chairman Adams lauded Chief Judge for programs he had instituted in the county. O.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. 7. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Ginn asked that 7.C. be separated just to mention that the person resigning from the Utilities Advisory Committee was Chairman Macht's veryfine appointee and reminded him to make a new appointment. 7.A. Ap oval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 29, 1999: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JULY 29,1999 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of July 15. to July 29, 1999. Attachment: AUGUST 17, 1999 3 BOOK L',1Gt 18 11 NUK hO PAGE Q AUGUST 17, 1999 4 0 0 _I ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period July 15-29, 1999, as requested. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020074 L B SMITH, INC 1999-07-15 .00 VOID 0020092 THE GUARDIAN 1999-07-22 6,901.90 0020093 U S D A RURAL HOUSING SERVICE 1999-07-23 428.00 0020094 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 1999-07-26 1,118.00 0020095 THE GUARDIAN 1999-07-26 7,715.68 0255870 MARTIN, GEOFF W 1999-01-14 .00 VOID 0255871 WALDEN, RENEE 1999-01-14 .00 VOID 0256150 SCHOBERG, TERESA 1999-01-21 .00 VOID 0256164 POLK, MIHAN 1999-01-21 .00 VOID 0257281 MILES, MARVIN 1999-02-11 .00 VOID 0257669 FUSTER, ALONSO 1999-02-18 .00 VOID 0260490 GROEL, MILDRED 1999 -OA -08 .00 VOID 0260494 HILL, MATTHEW C 1999-04-08 .00 VOID 0260912 MURPHY, THOMAS 1999-04-15 .00 VOID 0261774 PIERCE, ANGEL M 1999-04-29 .00 VOID 0261806 BALD, SASITYA 1999-04-29 .00 VOID 0261810 HELMS, ROBERT 1999-04-29 .00 VOID 0264126 CLARK, LARRY 1999-06-10 .00 VOID 0264584 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 1999-06-24 .00 VOID 0264606 COLEMAN, BONNIE M 1999-06-24 .00 VOID 0264680 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 1999-06-24 .00 VOID 0264724 MAIWALD PRODUCTIONS 1999-06-24 .00 VOID 0264741 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 1999-06-24 .00 VOID 0264817 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 1999-06-24 .00 VOID 0265077 ELITE TITLE 1999-06-30 .00 VOID 0265414 FERNANDER, THOMAS 1999-07-08 .00 VOID 0265464 LAQUINTA INN 1999-07-08 .00 VOID 0265786 L B SMITH, INC 1999-07-15 .00 VOID 0266005 ALBERTSON'S 1999-07-22 .00 VOID 0266028 BRADFORD, WAYNE OR RENEE 1999-07-22 .00 VOID 0266520 ANDERSON, FRED 1999-07-23 148.00 0266521 BECHT, TONYA AND CITY OF VERO 1999-07-23 92.00 0266522 BROXTON, LYDIA 1999-07-23 223.00 0266523 BREVCO PROPERTIES, INC 1999-07-23 471.00 0266524 BEUTTELL, PETER M 1999-07-23 270.00 0266525 SILKEN GROUP 1999-07-23 1,361.00 0266526 BEANS, ROBERT 1999-07-23 163.00 0266527 BROOKS, DONNA AND CITY OF VERO 1999-07-23 59.00 0266528 BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1999-07-23 1,158.00 0266529 BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H 1999-07-23 397.00 0266530 BLAHNIK, CHRIS OR MILDRED 1999-07-23 224.00 0266531' BUCKNER, SHEILA & CITY OF VERO 1999-07-23 84.00 0266532 BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF 1999-07-23 .00 VOID 0266532 BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF 1999-07-23 .00 VOID 0266533 BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY 1999-07-23 484.64 0266534 BLUE, YOLANDA 1999-07-23 477.00 0266535 CARTWRIGHT, WILLIAM AND/ 1999-07-23 197.00 0266536 CORR, RHODA L 1999-07-23 299.00 0266537 COLLINS, THOMAS H 1999-07-23 850.00 0266538 COSCO, KEN 1999-07-23 387.00 0266539 CENTURY 21 SEATREX REALTY, INC 1999-07-23 245.00 AUGUST 17, 1999 4 0 0 _I • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266540 CARLTON, ALLAN R 1999-07-23 306.00 0266541 C,P E ASSOCIATES 1999-07-23 943.00 0266542 CAPAK, GERALD T 1999-07-23 350.00 0266543 CUMMINGS, JERRY 1999-07-23 424.00 0266544 CLUNK, JEFFREY 1999-07-23 341.00 0266545 CARONE, PAUL 1999-07-23 230.00 0266546 CHAMBLISS, CHIQUITA AND CITY 1999-07-23 18.00 0266547 CARLUCCI, LEONARD A 1999-07-23 404.00 0266548 DAN PREUSS REALTY, INC 1999-07-23 274.00 0266549 DOOLITTLE JAMES A & ASSOCIATES 1999-07-23 2,982.00 0266550 DENNISON, WANDA 1999-07-23 911.00 0266551 DOVE, E WILSON 1999-07-23 253.00 0266552 DOYLE, CHERYL 1999-07-23 305.00 0266553 EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113) 1999-07-23 473.00 0266554 EDWARD, FRANKLIN 1999-07-23 327.00 0266555 FOGERTY, GEORGE A 1999-07-23 315.00 0266556 FRESH, DANIEL J 1999-07-23 _ 228.00 0266557 FT PIERCE, CITY OF 1999-07-23 1,867.92 0266558 FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC 1999-07-23 350.00 0266559 GASKILL, ROBERT 1999-07-23 251.00 0266560 GRIMM, FLOYD OR HELEN 1999-07-23 190.00 0266561 GIFFORD GROVES, LTD 1999-07-23 11,325.00 0266562 GEORGE, MARY KIM 1999-07-23 579.00 0266563 GRACE'S LANDING LTD 19,99-07-23 3,100.00 0266564 GLOVERSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY 1999-07-23 249.64 0266565 HOLM, LEO 1999-07-23 445.00 0266566 HAMM, BEVERLY AND CITY OF VERO 1999-07-23 89.00 0266567 IMBRIANI, VINCENT 1999-07-23 451.00 0266568 JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES 1999-07-23 5,603.00 0266569 JAHOLKOWSKI, PAUL 1999-07-23 278.00 0266570 JENNINGS, LESSIE 1999-07-23 261.00 0266571 JAHOLKOWSKI, MIKE 1999-07-23 245.00 0266572 JULIN, PAUL 1999-07-23 185.00 0266573 JONES, WILLIAM C 1999-07-23 335.00 0266574 JOHNSTON, PATTIE 1999-07-23 391.00 0266575 JONES, ALPHONSO 1999-07-23 258.00 0266576 KOLB, GREGORY L 1999-07-23 443.00 0266577 KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA 1999-07-23 526.00 0266578 KISSIMMEE, CITY OF 1999-07-23 484.64 0266579 LAWRENCE, TERRY A 1999-07-23 191.00 0266580 LLERENA, E D 1999-07-23 472.00 0266581 LANGLEY, PHILIP G 1999-07-23 239.00 0266582 LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS 1999-07-23 6,944.00 0266583 MIXELL, LLONALD AND/OR 1999-07-23 626.00 0266584 M 0 D INVESTMENTS 1999-07-23 1,037.00 0266585 MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM 1999-07-23 201.00 0266586 MANN, ROBERT OR WANDA ARMA 1999-07-23 203.00 0266587 MALGERIA, PRISCILLA 1999-07-23 423.00 0266588 MORRILL, TINA AND CITY OF 1999-07-23 31.00 0266589 MCINTOSH, SYLVESTER B JR 199-07-23 426.00 0266590 MULLINS, B FRANK 1999-07-23 501.00 0266591 MC CLAY, ROBIN 1999-07-23 312.00 .0266592 MCGRIFF, SHARON AND CITY OF 1999-07-23 28.00 0266593 MCNEAL, JAMES 1999-07-23 177.00 0266594 MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF 1999-07-23 390.64 0266595 NEUHAUSER', ERNEST 1999-07-23 272.00 0266596 OLIVER, DOROTHY 1999-07-23 400.00 0266597 ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND 1999-07-23 600.64 0266598 PARKER, RALPH & CITY OF VERO 1999-07-23 43.00 0266599 PALMER TRAILER PARK 1999-07-23 445.00 0266600 POLLY, EMMA 1999-07-23 979.00 0266601 PIERSON, JOHN H DBA 1999-07-23 322.00 0266602 PALUMBO, LOUIS 1999-07-23 356.00 AUGUST 17,1999 5 • coop Face + F"? BOOK i 10 FA'E b CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266603 REAGAN, WILLIE C 1999-07-23 614.00 0266604 RENNICK, RONALD 1999-07-23 313.00 0266605 RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST 1999-07-23 155.00 0266606 REALTY CONNECTIONS OF VERO,INC 1999-07-23 386.00 0266607 REARDANZ, MARVIN 1999-07-23 499.00 0266608 RICHARDS, WILLIAM A 1999-07-23 442.00 0266609 RODRIGUEZ, BLANCA 1999-07-23 337.00 0266610 RICOTTI, RICARDO 1999-07-23 180.00 0266611 RIVER PARK PLACE 1999-07-23 1,981.00 0266612 ST FRANCIS MANOR 1999-07-23 2,299.00 0266613 SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS 1999-07-23 324.00 0266614 SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR 1999-07-23 490.00 0266615 SABONJOHN, FLORENCE 1999-07-23 268.00 0266616 SAVAGE, GEORGE R 1999-07-23 500.00 0266617 SANFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY 1999-07-23 360.64 0266618 SANDY PINES 1999-07-23 4,772.00 0266619 SHELTON, ROBERT L 1999-07-23 424.00 0266620 STARCK, MICHAEL R 1999-07-23 345.00 0266621 STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR 1999-07-23 212.00 0266622 SUNDMAN, IVAN 1999-07-23 299.00 0266623 SPARKS, DAVID 1999-07-23 113.00 0266624 STIMELING, PAUL B OR MARGARET 1999-07-23 161.00 0266625 SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA 1999-07-23 65.00 0266626 TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING 1999-07-23 414.00 0266627 TOLBERT, JEANETTE AND CITY OF 1999-07-23 34.00 0266628 VERO..MOBILE HOME PARK 1999-07-23 490.00 0266629 VERO FIRST CORPORATION 1999-07-23 2,658.00 0266630 BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN) 1999-07-23 284.00 0266631 WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M 1999-07-23 496.00 0266632 WILLIAMS, DEBRA WASHINGTON 1999-07-23 121.00 0266633 WILLIAMS, EDITH 1999-07-23 329.00 0266634 YORK, LILLY B 1999-07-23 193.00 0266635 YORK, DAVID 1999-07-23 379.00 0266636 ZANCA, LEONARD 1999-07-23 1,127.00 0266637 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-07-29 79.25 0266638 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 1999-07-29 1,609.27 0266639 AIRBORNE EXPRESS 1999-07-29 22.25 0266640 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 1999-07-29 175.50 0266641 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO 1999-07-29 893.15 0266642 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 1999-07-29 208.55 0266643 ACTION DIESEL INJECTION 1999-07-29 443.85 0266644 A A ELECTRIC SE, INC 1999-07-29 12.80 0266645 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL 1999-07-29 18.00 0266646 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 1999-07-29 50.00 0266647 COMMONWEALTH TECH 1999-07-29 500.00 0266648 A T & T 1999-07-29 24.08 0266649 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE 1999-07-29 34,634.03 0266650 ASHWORTH INC 1999-07-29 390.84 0266651 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 1999-07-29 10,000.00 0266652 ALBERTSON'S 1999-07-29 225.97 0266653 ANTHONY BAIL BONDS 1999-07-29 994.00 0266654 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS 1999-07-29 49.73 0266655 AVATAR UTILITY SERVICES, INC 1999-07-29 12,161.56 0266656 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 1999-07-29 57.00 0266657 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 1999-07-29 632.00 0266658 APA -FLORIDA CHAPTER 1999-07-29 130.50 0266659 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 1999-07-29 122.61 0266660 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 1999-07-29 2,411.00 0266661 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1999-07-29 1,932.68 0266662 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 1999-07-29 71.00 0266663 BILL'S TV SERVICE CENTER, INC 1999-07-29 165.90 AUGUST 17, 1999 G • C CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266664 BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY 1999-07-29 574.47 0266665 BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD 1999-07-29 725.00 0266666 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 1999-07-29 193,590.33 0266667 BARNETT BAIL BONDS 1999-07-29 2,497.00 0266668 BLACK BOX CORPORATION 1999-07-29 352.17 0266669 BOB'S BARRICADES, INC 1999-07-29 249.17 0266670 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 1999-07-29 993.30 0266671 BRODART CO 1999-07-29 3,127.40 0266672 BROWN, DONALD JR 1999-07-29 6,988.00 0266673 BELLSOUTH COMMUNICATION 1999-07-29 1,781.76 0266674 BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF 1999-07-29 285.64 0266675 BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE 1999-07-29 200.00 0266676 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 1999-07-29 65.00 0266677 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 1999-07-29 370.52 0266678 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 1999-07-29 10.62 0266679 BELLSOUTH 1999-07-29 3,797.82 0266680 BOBBY'S PLUMBING 1999-07-29 560.00 0266681 BETTER COPY CENTER, A 1999-07-29 1,024.19 0266682 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 1999-07-29 10,863.72 0266683 BELLSOUTH 1999-07-29 658.00 0266684 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 1999-07-29 83.04 0266685 BREVARD ASSOCIATED COURT 1999-07-29 53.20 0266686 BEN MEADOWS CO INC 1099-07-29 803.98 0266687 BIG SKY PHOTOGRAPHY 1999-07-29 140.00 0266688 BELLSOUTH 1999-07-29 1,708.57 0266689 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC 1999-07-29 57,672.00 0266690 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO., INC 1999-07-29 22.26 0266691 CERTIFIED SLINGS, INC 1999-07-29 162.87 0266692 CLASSIC AWARDS 1999-07-29 50.58 0266693 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 1999-07-29 19.00 0266694 COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC 1999-07-29 14.67 0266695 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 1999-07-29 12,958.50 0266696 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E 1999-07-29 140.00 0266697 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 1999-07-29 14,246.11 0266698 CLINIC PHARMACY 1999-07-29 583.11 0266699 COPELAND, LINDA 1999-07-29 763.00 0266700 CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC 1999-07-29 18.35 0266701 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 1999-07-29 147.27 0266702 CARROLL COLLINS BONDING 1999-07-29 994.00 0266703 CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL 1999-07-29 211.25 0266704 COMPLETE WET/DRY SANDBLASTING 1999-07-29 700.00 0266705 CALL ONE, INC 1999-07-29 58.35 0266706 CUES, INC 1999-07-29 1,367.33 0266707 COAST TO COAST JANITOR SVS 1999-07-29 695.00 0266708 CHENEY BROTHERS, INC 1999-07-29 147.75 0266709 CLIFFORD, MIKE 1999-07-29 100.00 0266710 CHAMPION MANUFACTURING INC 1999-07-29 69.20 0266711 CAMPBELL, STEPHANIE 1999-07-29 162.22 0266712 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 1999-07-29 403.50 0266713 COLUMBIA HOUSE 1999-07-29 97.48 0266714 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN 1999-07-29 2,173.07 0266715 COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT LEASING 1999-07-29 672.00 0266716 COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT LEASING 1999-07-29 98.92 0266717 DEEP SIX DIVE SHOP, INC 1999-07-29 113.18 0266718 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC 1999-07-29 359,984.00 0266719 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION 1999-07-29 37.00 0266720 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC 1999-07-29 4,607.25 0266721 DIVOTS SPORTSWEAR, INC 1999-07-29 388.19 0266722 DESIGNED TRAFFIC 1999-07-29 14,918.10 0266723 DAVIS INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION 1999-07-29 175.00 0266724 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 1999-07-29 41.18 AUGUST 17, 1999 7 BOOK ilo rnE 88 BOOK FACE CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266725 DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC 1999-07-29 156.20 0266726 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 1999-07-29 75.00 0266727 DUPAGE COUNTY 1999-07-29 33.00 0266728 DUNCAN, WILLIAM D 1999-07-29 289.00 0266729 D B ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC 1999-07-29 8,529.30 0266730 E -Z -BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC 1999-07-29 58.50 0266731 E G P, INC 1999-07-29 96.00 0266732 ESQUIRE REPORTING INC 1999-07-29 87.00 0266733 EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES 1999-07-29 44.67 0266734 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 1999-07-29 678.50 0266735 ELLIOTT BUSINESS MACHINES, INC 1999-07-29 224.25 0266736 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL 1999-07-29 11,680.00 0266737 ELITE TITLE 1999-07-29 7,500.00 0266738 ELLIOTT, BECKI 1999-07-29 763.75 0266739 FEDEX 1999-07-29 53.50 0266740 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 1999-07-29 100.00 0266741 FLORIDA ALCOHOL AND DRUG 1999-07-29 50.00 0266742 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO 1399-07-29 1,614.00 0266743 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1999-07-29 12,710.81 0266744 FLORIDA DEPT OF LABOR/EMPLOYMT 1999-07-29 5.67 0266745 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 1999-07-29 42.80 0266746 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC 1999-07-29 1,719.60 0266747 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE 1999-07-29 6,520.00 0266748 FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER 1999-07-29 38.62 0266749 FLORIDA AMATEUR 1999-07-29 400.00 0266750 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE 1999-07-29 10,000.00 0266751 FLORIDA COUNCIL ON CRIME AND 1999-07-29 90.00 0266752 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC 1999-07-29 70.04 0266753 FACTS ON FILE INC 1999-07-29 230.00 0266754 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 1999-07-29 545.08 0266755 FLORIDA LABOR LETTER 1999-07-29 259.00 0266756 FLORIDA COUNTIES FOUNDATION 1999-07-29 90.00 0266757 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 1999-07-29 3,305.54 0266758 FERNANDER, THOMAS 1999-07-29 1,417.00 0266759 F V CASANO 1999-07-29 990.00 0266760 FORTHMAN, LESLIE ANN 1999-07-29 500.00 0266761 FLORIDA PARENT EDUCATION 1999-07-29 25.00 0266762 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE 1999-07-29 10,000.00 0266763 GALE GROUP, THE 1999-07-29 679.26 0266764 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC 1999-07-29 59.78 0266765 GLACE & RADCLIFFE, INC 1999-07-29 2,719.29 0266766 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-07-29 790.68 0266767 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 1999-07-29 1,128.71 0266768 GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY 1999-07-29 2,942.56 0266769 GREYHOUND LINES, INC. 1999-07-29 269.00 0266770 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 1999-07-29 324.15 0266771 GREENE, ROBERT E 1999-07-29 1,856.77 0266772 GEAC COMPUTERS INC 1999-07-29 57,765.50 0266773 GINN, CAROLINE D 1999-07-29 68.41 0266774 GIBSON, JAMES 1999-07-29 111.14 0266775' GATEWAY LEARNING CORP 1999-07-29 25.00 0266776 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 1999-07-29 247.49 0266777 HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC 1999-07-29 41.76 0266778 HIGHSMITH, INC 1999-07-29 209.95 0266779 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 1999-07-29 578.48 0266780 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 1999-07-29 136.50 0266781 HACH..COMPANY 1999-07-29 124.00 0266782 HARTSFIELD, CELESTE L 1999-07-29 161.00 0266783 HAMPTON INN 1999-07-29 450.00 0266784 HOLLOMAN III, WILLIE JAMES 1999-07-29 206.00 0266785 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-07-29 57,400.83 AUGUST 17, 1999 8 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266786 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 1999-07-29 4,296.10 0266787 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-07-29 75.00 0266788 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 1999-07-29 433.00 0266789 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 1999-07-29 269.35 0266790 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 1999-07-29 1,856.52 0266791 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 1999-07-29 28.88 0266792 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-07-29 2,500.00 0266793 INSURANCE SERVICING & 1999-07-29 2,795.00 0266794 INNOVATIVE NETWORK SYSTEMS 1999-07-29 975.00 0266795 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-07-29 50.00 0266796 IBM CORPORATION 1999-07-29 1,742.62 0266797 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 1999-07-29 100,451.42 0266798 IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1999-07-29 262.28 0266799 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1999-07-29 301.00 0266800 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLAWING 1999-07-29 45.00 0266801 JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 1999-07-29 385.80 0266802 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 1999-07-29 902.08 0266803 JIFFY PHOTO CENTER 1999-07-29 42.00 0266804 JOBTRAK 1999-07-29 18.00 0266805 KEATING, ROBERT M 1999-07-29 80.68 0266806 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC 1999-07-29 95.00 0266807 KELLY TRACTOR CO 1999-07-29 1,576.74 0266808 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC 1999-07-29 11,039.06 0266809 KELLER, SCHLEICHER & 1999-07-29 250.00 0266810 KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT 1999-07-29 1,192.13 0266811 KLINK, RICHARD 1999-07-29 814.00 0266812 KRUGER, INC 1999-07-29 1,648.92 0266813 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 1999-07-29 1,483.29 0266814 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 1999-07-29 1,007.58 0266815 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 1999-07-29 2,553.26 0266816 LAWYERS DIARY & MANUAL 1999-07-29 28.00 0266817 L I TREE SERVICE, INC 1999-07-29 1,054.00 0266818 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC 1999-07-29 1,382.80 0266819 L B SMITH, INC 1999-07-29 189.06 0266820 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 1999-07-29 1,760.03 0266821 LERNER PUBLICATIONS CO 1999-07-29 16.95 0266822 LITMAN, GARY W PH.D 1999-07-29 4,006.75 0266823 LEXIS LAW PUBLISHING 1999-07-29 54.53 0266824 LIVINGSTON, NANCY 1999-07-29 20.00 0266825 MASSUNG, KIMBERLY.E 1999-07-29 10.00 0266826 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 1999-07-29 107.10 0266827 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1999-07-29 14,505.91 0266828 MICROFORMS MANAGEMENT CORP 1999-07-29 145.00 0266829 MIKES GARAGE 1999-07-29 215.00 0266830 MORGAN, DAVID C 1999-07-29 465.26 0266831 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO 1999-07-29 975.00 0266832 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC 1999-07-29 569.00 0266833 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1999-07-29 296.80 0266834 MARC INDUSTRIES 1999-07-29 643.76 0266835 MICKLE, VALERIE 1999-07-29 42.07 0266836 MISSION INN RESORT 1999-07-29 246.00 0266837 M W I CORPORATION 1999-07-29 714.14 0266838 MILLER, JOSEPH C 1999-07-29 115.71 0266839 MEDICARE 1999-07-29 377.19 0266840 MURPHY, DEBBIE 1999-07-29 108.00 0266841 NOLTE, DAVID C 1999-07-29 181,074.74 0266842 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 1999-07-29 107.29 0266843 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO 1999-07-29 1,820.00 0266844 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 1999-07-29 32,397.33 0266845 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO 1999-07-29 23.70 AUGUST 17, 1999 0 BOOK PAGE ROOK FAGE CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266846 NATIONAL AUDIO CO, INC 1999-07-29 121.55 0266847 N_E C BUSINESS NETWORK 1999-07-29 432.98 0266848 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK 1999-07-29 67.90 0266849 N P CHILTON 1999-07-29 116.94 0266850 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 1999-07-29 1,138.56 0266851 OFFICE DEPOT, INC i 1999-07-29 2,209.32 0266852 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 1999-07-29 8,493.66 0266853 PAN AMERICAN ENG CO 1999-07-29 240.00 0266854 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION 1999-07-29 500.00 0266855 PHYSIO CONTROL CORPORATION 1999-07-29 172.22 0266856 POWERLINE ELECTRIC 1999-07-29 64.50 0266857 PETTY CASH 1999-07-29 120.25 0266858 PROFESSIONAL TITLE OF 1999-07-29 10,000.00 0266859 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 1999-07-29 239.82 0266860 PERCONTI DATA SYSTEMS, INC 1999-07-29 30,000.00 0266861 PRESS JOURNAL 1999-07-29 102.00 0266862 PURDY, GARY 1999-07-29 57.00 0266863 PANGBURN, TERRI 1999-07-29 _ 24.00 0266864 PRESS JOURNAWSTUART NEWS 1999-07-29 359.07 0266865 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 1999-07-29 91.15 0266866 P C ZONE, THE 1999-07-29 406.98 0266867 PIERCE & ASSOCIATES 1999-07-29 500.00 0266868 PROSPER, JANET C 1999-07-29 224.00 0266869 PROFORMA 1999-07-29 79.80 0266870 PEBTF 1999-07-29 46.61 0266871 PAUL, DEREK K, MD 1999-07-29 150.00 0266872 P M BOOK SHOP 1999-07-29 35.00 0266873 PELLETIER, MICHAEL A 1999-07-29 500.00 0266874 QUALITY BOOKS, INC 1999-07-29 38.18 0266875 RADIOSHACK 1999-07-29 152.42 0266876 RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD 1999-07-29 750.00 0266877 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC 1999-07-29 41.54 0266878 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 1999-07-29 29,292.51 0266879 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC 1999-07-29 61,386.84 0266880 RECORDED BOOKS INC 1999-07-29 17.85 0266881 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 1999-07-29 44.70 0266882 RAPP, PAMELA 1999-07-29 12.00 0266883 REXEL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC 1999-07-29 352.00 0266884 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 1999-07-29 1,356.63 0266885 ROMANO, CHRISTINA 1999-07-29 19.31 0266886 ROBBIE'S PLACE 1999-07-29 145.00 0266887 SCHOPP, BARBARA G 1999-07-29 80.50 0266888 SCOTTY'S, INC 1999-07-29 35.64 0266889 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC 1999-07-29 35.50 0266890 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 1999-07-29 150.00 0266891 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC 1999-07-29 178.94 0266892 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE 1999-07-29 4,459.33 0266893 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 1999-07-29 121.00 0266894 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1999-07-29 209.32 0266895 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO 1b99-07-29 78.03 0266896• ST JOHN'S RIVER WATER MGMT 1999-07-29 200.00 0266897 ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC 1999-07-29 1,279.34 02.66898 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC 1999-07-29 345.50 0266899 STRUNK FUNERAL HOME 1999-07-29 800.00 0266900 SIMON & SCHUSTER 1999-07-29 320.20 0266901 SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES INC 1999-07-29 44.00 0266902 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMEN'! SALES 1999-07-29 33,017.37 0266903 SUPERIOR PRINTING 1999-07-29 4,429.95 0266904 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 1999-07-29 490.10 0266905 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO 1999-07-29 76.74 0266906 STANBRIDGE, RUTH 1999-07-29 65.25 AUGUST 17, 1999 10 C CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266907 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 1999-07-29 50.00 0266908 SHIELDS, VANESSA 1999-07-29 38.62 0266909 SCHWEY, PAUL MATTHEW 1999-07-29 80.00 0266910 HAMMOND & SMITH P A. 1999-07-29 18.50 0266911 SHERAR, CRAIG Z, P A 1999-07-29 5,509.39 0266912 SHELL FLEET CARD 1999-07-29 73.25 0266913 SOUTHERN PETROLEUM SYSTEMS INC 1999-07-29 917.07 0266914 T-SHIRT FACTORY 1999-07-29 _ 710.30 0266915 TLC DIVERSIFIED, INC 1999-07-29 250,706.51 0266916 TIPPIN, JOHN W 1999-07-29 75.57 0266917 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 1999-07-29 680.00 0266918 TRADEWINDS 1999-07-29 810.00 0266919 TRANSTECTOR SYSTEMS INC 1999-07-29 986.82 0266920 UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES 1999-07-29 410.50 0266921 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1999-07-29 22.46 0266922 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1999-07-29 80.50 0266923 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 1999-07-29 2,041.20 0266924 UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY CO 1999-07-29 696.00 0266925 VELDE FORD, INC 1999-07-29 1,219.23 0266926 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-07-29 50,798.40 0266927 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-07-29 9,175.00 0266928 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC 1999-07-29 56.85 0266929 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC 1999-07-29 134.89 0266930 VERO MARINE CENTER, INC 1999-07-29 74.78 0266931 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-07-29 1,649.11 0266932 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-07-29 101.82 0266933 VERO BOWL 1999-07-29 228.80 0266934 VERG_BEARING & BOLT 1999-07-29 180.46 0266935 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 1999-07-29 25.00 0266936 VERO HERITAGE INC 1999-07-29 802.46 0266937 VERO COLLISION 1999-07-29 150.00 0266938 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1999-07-29 308.15 0266939 WILD, JOE 1999-07-29 594.17 0266940 W W GRAINGER, INC 1999-07-29 184.92 0266941 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1999-07-29 123.22 0266942 WINN DIXIE 1999-07-29 342.02 0266943 WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF 1999-07-29 483,703.00 0266944 WHARTON-SMITH, INC 1999-07-29 83,646.67 0266945 WYNDHAM HARBOUR ISLAND HOTEL 1999-07-29 158.00 0266946 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 1b99-07-29 74.50 0266947 WOLFE, ERIN 1999-07-29 33.47 0266948 WALGREEN CO 1999-07-29 309.03 0266949 WEEKS, PAUL E 1999-07-29 233.00 0266950 XEROX CORPORATION 1999-07-29 168.00 0266951 ZIMMERMANN, KARL 1999-07-29 268.20 0266952 ZIMMERMANN, KARL 1999-07-29 185.90 0266953 LANE, EMMETT 1999-07-29 177.34 0266954 MIDDLETON, KENT 1999-07-29 4,245.60 0266955 MILLER, JOSEPH AND LLOYD, 1999-07-29 321.94 0266956 MERCURI, DEBRA 1999-07-29 121.53 0266957 COOPER, GEORGE 1999-07-29 297.66 0266958 CLARK, LARRY 1999-07-29 20.88 0266959 FLINCHUM CONSTRUCTION 1999-07-29 70.04 0266960 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 1999-07-29 134.08 0266961 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 1999-07-29 42.34 0266962 LINGO, THEODORE 1999-07-29 68.17 0266963 BRANNON, DIANE 1999-07-29 8.37 0266964 CIBOTTI, MARIE 1999-07-29 64.83 0266965 GENOVESE, ROSEMARY B 1999-07-29 _ 34.36 AUGUST 17, 1999 11 • BOOK Pf�Gr '92 A BOOK i10 F'AGE 93 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0266966 SECHEN, ROBERT N 1999-07-29 10.69 0266967 PHILLIPS, CHERI 1999-07-29 49.37 0266968 BIELEFELD, RON & KENDRA 1999-07-29 44.12 0266969 DYE, REBECCA S 1999-07-29 43.04 0266970 ADKINS, ALICIA 1999-07-29 11.51 0266971 DOTTERWEICH, WILLIAM E 1999-07-29 6.16 0266972 WRIGHT, JENNIFER 1999-07-29 50.50 0266973 WEAVER, CYNTHIA 1999-07-29 14.71 0266974 WELLINGTON HOMES 1999-07-29 76.67 0266975 STANLEY, ROBERT T 1999-07-29 50.52 0266976 MAURER, LINDA C 1999-07-29 68.37 0266977 HINZMAN, FRANK D 1999-07-29 15.09 0266978 PIERRE, SAFAITE 1999-07-29 29.83 0266979 ADDEO, MELISSA 1999-07-29 28.50 0266980 AMERITREND HOMES 1999-07-29 69.24 0266981 BAKER, DIANE L 1999-07-29 20.02 0266982 MOSELEY, JAMES J & VALDIVA 1999-07-29 3.30 0266983 BURTON, KAMI 1999-07-29 2.83 0266984 HICKS, WENDY 1999-07-29 36.66 0266985 NAPLES, DEBORAH 1999-07-29 29.25 0266986 WILKINSON, JAMES O 1999-07-29 68.72 0266987 FRENCH, DAVID 1999-07-29 15.39 0266988 ROZSONITS, RUSTY 1999-07-29 22.58 0266989 OSWALD, GERALD J 1999-07-29 38.45 0266990 THOMAS, ALAN & PAULA 1999-07-29 77.32 0266991 BERNSTEIN, ALLEN A 1999-07-29 52.53 0266992 AVRIL, HOWARD C 1999-07-29 58.62 0266993 ONDERDONK, ERNEST 1999-07-29 54.30 0266994 STONE, SCOTT K 1999-07-29 52.54 0266995 SIMONTON, RAYMOND 1999-07-29 54.68 0266996 PALMER, MALCOLM C999-07-29 104.70 0266997 NAGLE, JOHN E 1x999-07-29 108.21 0266998 REISZEL, ADRIENNE 1999-07-29 70.00 0266999 ZIEGLER, JACK W 1999-07-29 107.92 0267000 BROWN, CALVIN & CANDA• 1999-07-29 105.54 0267001 ROMERO, LORNA 1999-07-29 53.80 2,567,554.93 7.B. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 5, 1999: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: AUGUST 5,1999 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR AUGUST 17,1999 12 _I • In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of July 29 to August 5, 1999. Attachment: ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period July 29 -August 5, 1999, as requested. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK !LUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020096 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 1999-07-29 3,969.58 0020097 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST 1959-07-30 200.00 0020098 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND 1999-08-03 944.26 7020099 FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1999-08-03 235,498.05 0020100 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 1999-08-04 6,437.50 0020101 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 1999-08-04 3,733.80 :020102 KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE 1999-08-04 138.50 0020103 BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1999-08-04 963.04 0020104 ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1999-08-04 135.20 0020105 ST LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1999-08-04 724.98 0020106 VELASQUEZ, MERIDA 1999-08-04 200.00 0020107 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF 1999-08-04 3,376.47 0020108 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 1999-08-04 425.00 0020109 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 1999-08-04 75.00 3020110 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. 1999-08-04 2,466.00 :020111 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 1999-08-04 84,241.77 0`020112 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 1999-08-04 245.57 :020113 NACO/SOUTHEAST 1999-08-04 6,_277.49 020114 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 1999-08-04 639.93 :'020115 OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REL 1999-08-04 167.25 ;:020116 WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS 1999-08-04 23.08 0267002 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 1999-08-05 56.95 )267003 'ALEXANDER BATTERY COMPANY 1999-08-05 1,302.24 )267004 AMERICAN BUSINESS INTERIORS 1999-08-05 484.52 X267005 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 1999-08-05 2,674.08 :367006 ABS PUMPS, INC 1999-08-05 114.37 "267007• ACTION DIESEL INJECTION 1999-08-05 325.00 ;'267008 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 1999-08-05 59.90 :267009 A T & T 1999-08-05 71.14 :'267010 ARBITELLE, CAROL 1999-08-05 380.30 X267011 AMERITREND HOMES 1999-08-05 500.00 :267012 AMERITREND HOMES 1999-08-05 500.00 :'267013 ART GARCIA BLDG CONTRACTOR INC 1999-08-05 11000.00 ;267014 ANCHOR BOATS INC 1999-08-05 240.00 ;267015 ALTER, ARLEEN 1999-08-05 33.64 267016 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 1999-08-05 2,356.25 267017 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1999-08-05 9,179.25 267018 BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY 1999-08-05 154.89 :267019 BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD 1999-08-05 1,500.00 ^267020 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 1999-08-05 2,760.53 AUGUST 17, 1999 13 �J BOOK '110 �'AE '11"1 BOOK 110 PAGUE 95 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT •.267021 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 1999-08-05 372.04 .:267022 BANKERS INSURANCE CO 1999-08-05 13,622.00 '.267023 BRODART CO 1999-08-05 1,961.43 :`267024 BETHEA, WANDA DR 1999-08-05 450.00 :267025 BARER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 1999-08-05 25.88 :267026 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 1999=08-05 22,877.30 :267027 BMG 1999-08-05 140.18 '267028 BATTERY BIZ 1999-08-05 150.00 '267029 BROOKER, ELIZABETH STEWART 1999-08-05 1,039.20 267030 BOYES & FARINA P A 19?9-08-05 9,886.22 267031 BRANDON CAPITAL CORPORATION 1999-08-05 500.00 0267032 DAVIS, BEVERLY 1999-08-05 566.26 0267033 BROWN, LORRAINE 1999-08-05 500.00 0267034 BELLSOUTH 1999-08-05 118.16 0267035 CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY 1999-08-05 182.75 0267036 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 1999-08-05 528.75 0267037 COLLINS, WILLIAM G II 1999-08-05 146.29 0267038 COMMERCIAL TITLE SERVICES, INC 1999-08-05 10,000.00 0267039 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 1999-08-05 1,273.79 0267040 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO 1999-08--05 500.00 0267041 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1999-08-05 31,876.50 0267042 CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY BOOKS 1999-08-05 309.80 0267043 COPELAND, LINDA 1999-08-05 73.50 0267044 CARTER & VERPLANCR 1999-08-05 41.25 0267045 CINDY'S PET CENTER, INC 1999-08-05 68.79 0267046 COLLINS BROWN CALDWELL BARKETT 1999-08-05 6,500.00 0267047 CALL ONE, INC 1999-08-05 26.68 0267048 C4 IMAGING SYSTEMS INC 1999-08-05 - 162.75 0267049 CHAMPION MANUFACTURING INC 1999-08-05 60.97 0267050 CYBERGUYS 1999-08-05 81.34 0267051 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 1999-08-05 200.00 0267052 COPYCO, INC 1999-08-05 48.64 0267053 CONRADO, STEFANIE 1999-08-05 211.15 0267054 DELTA SUPPLY CO 1999-08-05 806.17 0267055 FLORIDA DEPT OF MANAGEMENT 1999-08-05 3,474.06 0267056 DIAMOND R FERTILIZER, CO. INC 1999-08-05 33.12 0267057 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC . 1999-08-05 526.68 0267058 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 1999-08-05 107.04 0267059 DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC 1999-08-05 341.14 0267060 FLORIDA DEPT OF INSURANCE 1999-08-05 60.00 0267061 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 1999-08-05 111.23 0267062 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING & 1999-08-05 105.00 0267063 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 1999-08-05 70.65 0267064 DOCTORS' CLINIC 1999-08-05 206.00 0267065 DAVIDSON SALES CO 1999-08-05 117.55 0267066 DAUGHERTY, LISA 1999-08-05 500.00 0267067 3-D AUTO SALES 1999-08-05 100.00 0267068 DOOLEY & MACK CONST 1999-08-05 500.00 0267069 E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC 1999-08-05 40.50 0267070 EMERICK, RUSS 1999-08-05 7.89 0267071 ERHARDT, SUSIE 1999-08-05 69.17 0267072 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 1999-08-05 119.95 0267073 EXPEDITER INC, THE 1999-08-05 150.81 0267074 EAST COAST LASER & COMPUTER 1999-08-05 186.00 0267075 FINNEY, DONALD G 1999-08-05 32.77 0267076 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1999-08-05 209.89 0267077 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO 1999-08-05 2,468.00 0267078 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO 1999-08-05 162.30 0267079 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1999-08-05 3,939.01 0267080 FLORIDA TODAY/USA TODAY 1199-08-05 78.00 0267081 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 199-08-05 45.31 0267082 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC 1999-08-05 687.00 AUGUST 17, 1999 14 0 I CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0267083 FLINN, SHEILA I 1999-08-05 227.50 0267084 FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER 1999-08-05 38.63 0267085 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-08-05 50.00 0267086 FACTS ON FILE INC 1999-08-05 75.27 0267087 FIRSTLAB ' 1999-08-05 657.00 0267088 FANTASTIC FOLLIES 1999-08-05 49.80 0267089 GALE GROUP, THE 1999-08-05 815.68 0267090 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC 1999-08-05 463.97 0267091 GENERAL GMC, TRUCK 1999-08-05 50.20 0267092 0267092 GENE'S AUTO GLASS 1999-08-05 290.00 0267093 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 1999-08-05 167.79 0267094 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-08-05 1,093.04 0267095 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 1999-08-05 380.07 0267096 GALL'S INC 1999-08-05 323.60 0267097 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 1999-08-05 173.36 0267098 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 1999-08-05 8,124.14 0267099 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 1999-08-05 78.90 0267100 HECTOR TURF, INC 1999-08-05 4,456.12 0267101 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 1999-08-05 45.46 0267102 HALE CONSTRUCTION, INC 1999-08-05 500.00 0267103 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 1999-08-05 66.50 0267104 HACH COMPANY 1999-08-05 104.50 0267105 HARBOR BRANCH OCEANOGRAPHIC 1999-08-05 2,451.00 0267106 HILL MANUFACTURING 1999-08-05 907.72 0267107 HARTSFIELD, CELESTE L 1999-08-05 175.00 0267108 HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER 1999-08-05 22.00 0267109 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 1999-08-05 1,000.00 0267110 HASENQUER, KRIS 1999-08-05 36.00 0267111 HUNTER, TAMIKA 1999-08-05 162.23 0267112 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-08-05 4,280.00 0267113 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-08-05 25.00 0267114 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 1999-08-05 480.50 0267115 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 1999-08-05 630.38 0267116 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-08-05 184.50 0267117 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 1999-08-05 812.28 0267118 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 1999-08-05 30.16 0267119 INDIAN RIVER ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1999-08-05 30.00 0267120 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-08-05 1,300.00 0267121 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1999-08-05 1,110.00 0267122 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 1999-08-05 365.28 0267123 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 1999-08-05 199,058.44 0267124 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1999-08-05 100.00 0267125 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL 1999-08-05 2,582.26 0267126 IRVING, ATAWA 1999-08-05 150.00 0267127 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 1999-08-05 71.22 0267128 JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 1999-08-05 183.50 0267129 JAMES PUBLISHING, INC 1999-08-05 75.94 0267130 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 1999-08-05 70.51 0267131 JOELSON.CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY 1i999-08-05 9,018.56 0267132 JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS, INC 1999-08-05 500.00 0267133 JEFFERSOR. CHRISTOPHER A 1999-08-05 170.00 0267134 JIMMY'S A/C & REFRIGERATION 1999-08-05 1,325.00 0267135 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 1999-08-05 4,071.00 0267136 KEATING, ROBERT M 1999-08-05 66.50 0267137 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC 1999-08-05 167.41 0267138 KELLY TRACTOR CO 1999-08-05 114.12 0267139 KAPCO/KENT i 1999-08-05 244.86 0267140 KLINK, RICHARD 1999-08-05 968.00 0267141 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 1999-08-05 1,483.29 0267142 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 1999-08-05 6.44 0267143 KIPP, BILLY C 1999-08-05 412.00 AUGUST 17, 1909 15 • BOOK ��� o' FAGS 96 SOUK CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0267144 KALYN SIEBERT CANADA INC 1999-08-05 23,300.00 0267145 KOHN, MICHELLE 1999-08-05 50.00 0267146 KAFER, CHRISTOPHER J, JR 1999-08-05 4.10 0267147 L WALTON ELECTRIC, INC 1999-08-05 129.50 0267148 LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE 1999-08-05 15,000.00 0267149 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC 1999-08-05 201.08 0267150 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC 1999-08-05 597.71 0267151 LEWIS, RUTH A 1999-08-05 29.69 0267152 LFI VERO BEACH, INC 1999-08-05 5,366.96 0267153 LOCKWOOD, ROBERT 1999-08-05 2.00 0267154 LAWYERS WEEKLY PUBLICATIONS 1999-08-05 149.00 0267155 L J RUFFIN & ASSOC 1999-08-05 165.35 0267156 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC 1999-08-05 73.11 0267157 LEXIS LAW PUBLISHING 1999-08-05 53.63 0267158 LETLOW, WILLIE LEE 1999-08-03 300.00 0267159 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 1999-08-05 137.15 0267160 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 1999-08-05 107.68 0267161 MICKLER'S FLORIDIANA, INC 1999-08-05 159.92 0267162 MIKES GARAGE 1999-08-05 225.00 0267163 MILLER BEARINGS 1999 -08 -OS 9.54 0267164 MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS 1999-081-05 680.79 0267165 MORRIS, DANE 1999-08-05 12.67 0267166 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & 1999-08-05 2,125.50 0267167 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS 1999-08-05 71.90 0267168 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1999-08-05 196.77 0267169 M & R SPORTSWEAR 1999-08-05 35.47 0267170 MAURER, ERMA B, RN 1999-08-05 69.00 0267171 MELCHIORI, NICK 1999-08-05 141.50 0267172 MILLS, W G INC 1999-08-05 500.00 0267173 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 1999-08-05 500.00 0267174 MUELLER, MARK 1999-08-05 500.00 0267175 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION LAW 1999 -08 -OS 745.00 0267176 NAPIER, WILLIAM M 1999-08-05 38.86 0267177 NATIONAL PROPANE CORP 1999-08-05 55.63 0267178 NATIVE TREES 1999-08-05 1,160.00 0267179 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY 1999-08-05 128.13 0267180 NEOPOST 1999-08-05 1,209.00 0267181 N P CHILTON 1999-08-05 19.92 0267182 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 1t999-08-05 1,563.94 0267183 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1999-08-05 25.58 0267184 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 1999-08-05 534.44 0267185 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 1999-08-05 17,886.12 0267186 OLIVER, DOROTHY 1999-08-05 300.00 0267187 ON-SITE DISC WINDOW TINTING 1999-08-05 420.00 0267188 PARAGON ELECTRIC, INC 1999-08-05 22,245.00 0267189 PARKS RENTAL INC 1999-08-05 1,166.00 0267190 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY i 1999-08-05 43.00 0267191 PETTY CASH 1999-08-05 7.98 0267192 POSTMASTER 1999-08-05 15,000.00 0267193 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION 1999-08-05 7,100.00 0267194 PETTY CASH 1999-08-05 30.00 0267195 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 1999-08-05 284.12 0267196 PRESS JOURNAL 1999-08-05 519.75 0267197 PERKINS.MEDICAL SUPPLY 1999-08-05 204.05 0267198 PRESS JOURNAL - SUBSCRIPTION 1999-08-05 117.00 0267199 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 1999-08-05 201.92 0267200 POSTMASTER 1999-08-05 157.55 0267201 PAYNE, JAMES 1999-08-05 0267202 PROFORMA 1999-08-05 _170.00 39.00 0267203 PBS&J ANALYTICAL SERVICES 1999-08-05 400.00 0267204 QUALITY BOOKS, INC 1999-08-05 21.44 AUGUST 17, 1999 16 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0267205 RADIOSHACK 1999-08-05 59.99 0267206 RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC 1999-08-05 2,546.25 0267207 RADIOLOGY IMAGING ASSOCIATES 1999-08-05 114.00 0267208 R & G SOD FARMS 1999-08-05 155.00 0267209. RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 1999-08-05 37.46 0267210 RONDEAU, KATHLEEN 1999-08-05 200.00 0267211 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 1999-08-05 1,404.33 0267212 ROGER SHERMAN CONTRACTOR 1999-08-05 7,759.00 0267213 RASMUSSEN, ASHLEIGH 1999-08-05 355.35 0267214 ROMANO, CHRISTINA 1999-08-05 19.32 0267215 RIVERA, MANUEL ALCIDES 1999-08-05 300.00 0267216 RIESE, NARDA 1999-08-05 140.00 0267217 ROBERT L GROOVER & ASSOCIATES 1999-08-05 1,550.00 0267218 SCOTTY'S, INC 1999-08-05 19.90 0267219 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC 1999-08-05 11.99 0267220 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC 1999-08-05 209.53 0267221 SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF 1999-08-05 1,446.91 0267222 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 1999-08-05 303.04 0267223 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1999-08-05 5.29 0267224 SPENCER PEST CONTROL 1999-08-05 30.00 0267225 STATE ATTORNEY 19TH CIRCUIT 1999-08-05 35,779.44 0267226 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 1999-08-05 86.42 0267227 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO 1999-08-05 4.08 0267228 ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC 1999-08-05 170.34 0267229 SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1999-08-05 11,499.00 0267230 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC 1999-08-05 176.30 0267231 STEVENS BROTHERS FUNERAL HOME 1999-08-05 900.00 0267232 SAFARI PUTTING GOLF & GAMES 1999-08-05 55.00 0267233 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 1999-08-05 338.78 0267234 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 1499-08-05 12,706.48 0267235 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 1999-08-05 4,645.86 0267236 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-08-05 25.00 0267237 SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER 1999-08-05 500.00 0267238 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 1999-08-05 110.00 0267239 SKOK, ROBERT S 1999-08-05 14.25 0267240 SULLIVAN,'RACHEL 1999-08-05 190.55 0267241 SHIELDS, VANESSA 1999-08-05 38.63 0267242 SCHWEY, PAUL MATTHEW 1999-08-05 56.00 0267243 SALTENSTALL, MYRNA 1999-08-05 216.30 0267244 SMITH & KRAUS 1999-08-05 38.10 0267245 STOCKER, RYAN 1999-08-05 121.03 0267246 SAFELITE AUTO GLASS 1999-08-05 208.69 0267247 SHELL FLEET CARD 1999-08-05 995.19 0267248 STEWART, SARAH LYNN 1999-08-05 37.34 0267249 SOUTHERN PETROLEUM SYSTEMS INC 1999-08-05 83,991.93 0267250 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-08-05 3,761.93 0267251 TURNER BUILDERS 1999-08-05 500.00 0267252 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 1999-08-05 _304.78 0267253 TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER 1999-08-05 2,287.34 0267254 TERRA 1999-08-05 1,226.25 0267255 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 1999-08-05 6,160.68 0267256 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 1999-08-05 565.00 0267257 SMITH, TERRY L 1999-08-05 41.47 0267258 TARGET 1999-08-05 61,815.00 0267259 THERMOGAS COMPANY 1999-08-05 153.13 0267260 T A P SOD 1999-08-05 405.00 0267261 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 1999-08-05 245.40 0267262 TRANSTECTOR SYSTEMS INC 1999-08-05 986.82 AUGUST 17,1999 17 BOOK , 1XCE ' BOOK i 1 F"AGE CHECK NAME NUMBER CHECK CHECK DATE AMOUNT 0267263 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 1999-08-05 1,190.31 0267264 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 1999-08-05 4,298.40 0267265 U S GOVT PRINTING OFFICE 1999-08-05 57.00 0267266 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS INC 1999-08-05 3,420.00 0267267 VELDE FORD, INC 1999-08-05 3,435.35 0267268 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-08-05 1,889.70 0267269 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC 1999-08-05 333.90 0267270 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC 1999-08-05 147.57 0267271 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-08-05 29.52 0267272 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999 -08 -OS 678.00 0267273 VERO:LAKE ESTATES VOLUNTEER 1999 -08 -OS 25.00 0267274 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-08-05 100.00 0267275 VERO BEARING & BOLT 1999-08-05 864.20 0267276 VOLUNTEER ACTION COMMITTEE 1999-08-05 75.00 0267277 VERO COLLISION CENTER 1999-08-05 145.00 0267278 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1999-08-05 81.55 0267279 WALSH, LYNN 1999-08-05 56.84 0267280 WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY 1999-08-05 3.25 0267281 W W GRAINGER, INC 1999-08-05 30.52 0267282 WILLHOFF, PATSY 1999-08-05 260.00 0267283 WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC 1999-08-05 165.00 0267284 WILLIAMS, BETTY R, RN 1199-08-05 182.00 0267285 WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC 199-08-05 141.49 0267286 WAL*MART STORE 931 1999-08-05 122.10 0267287 WAREFORCE INC 1999-08-05 244.75 0267288 WOLFE, ERIN 1999-08-05 33.48 0267289 WOLF ROOFING & SIDING 1999-08-05 6,521.00 0267290 WILLIAMS, TOCCARA M 1999-08-05 247.20 0267291 WALGREENS'PHARMACY 1999-08-05 90.00 0267292 WOODFORD CONSTRUCTION 1999-08-05 50.00 0267293 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1999-08-05 123.67 0267294 BERNSTEIN, ALLEN A 1999-08-05 52.53 0267295 AVRIL, HOWARD C 1999-08-05 58.62 0267296 ONDERDONK, ERNEST 1999-08-05 54.30 0267297 STONE, SCOTT K 1999-08-05 52.54 0267298 SIMONTON, RAYMOND 1999-08-05 54.68 0267299 PALMER, MALCOLM C 1999-08-05 104.70 0267300 NAGLE, JOHN E 1999-08-05 108.21 0267301 REISZEL, ARDRIENNE 1999 -08 -OS 70.00 0267302 ZIEGLER, JACK W 1999-08-05 107.92 0267303 BROWN, CALVIN & CANDA 1999-08-05 105.54 0267304 DEPEW, BARBARA FLEENOR 1999-08-05 _ 53.80 0267305 ROBINSON, SAMUEL 1999-08-05 62.64 0267306 PAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING CO 1999-08-05 12.74 0267307 EWAR, GREVILLE 1999-08-05 61.86 0267308 ST HILAIRE, DONALD E 1999-08-05 38.78 0267309 CRESSWELL, GAIL J 1999-08-05 15.78 0267310 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 1999-08-05 40.74 0267311 BRANDON CAPITAL CORP 1999-08-05 100.00 0267312 STOFFER, WILLIAM 1999-08-05 40.69 0267313 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO INC 1999-08-05 593.48 0267314 STEWART, DAVID 1999-08-05 42.73 0267315 CLARK, ROBERT C 1999-08-05 66.47 0267316 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 1999-08-05 171.38 0267317 WOOD, DEBORAH J 1999-08-05 110.93 0267318 RENO, THOMAS M 1999-08-05 8.59 0267319 STEPHENSON, MOLLY 1999-08-05 13.51 0267320 DESHEFY, RICHARD W 1999-08-05 32.63 0267321 AAC BUILDERS INC 1999-08-05 63.60 0267322 GHO VERO BEACH INC 1999-08-05 48.26 0267323 SEQUIN, TAMMY & KEVIN 1999-08-05 63.18 0267324 TORTORICE, CHARLES J 1999-08-05 43.46 AUGUST 17, 1999 - 18 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0267325 MARCELLE, EDITH E 1999-08-05 31.98 0267326 HAMMOND, BOB D 1999-08-05 19.93 0267327 ROYAL DOULTON USA 1999-08-05 65.52 0267328 DUNFORD, WILLIAM 1999-08-05 27.67 0267329 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 1999-08-05 34.01 0267330 BARRY, STEPHEN J 1999-08-05 76.31 0267331 KERSTINE, CHARRIS KAY 1999-08-05 55.23 0267332 SMITH, RICHARD S 1999-08-05 78.88 0267333 BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA INC 1999-08-05 63.54 0267334 FORBES, KELA 1999-08-05 29.40 0267335 RCL DEVELOPMENT INC 1:99-08-05 249.86 0267336 OGONOSKI, ROBERT T 1 99-08-05 39.90 0267337 BOOK WAREHOUSE 1999-08-05 10.74 0267338 EGGLESTON, DARLENE 1999-08-05 13.09 0267339 GENESIS CHURCH 1999-08-05 25.99 0267340 WILLIAMS, VERNON E 1999-08-05 10.51 0267341 GRAND HARBOR LTD 1999-08-05 83.77 0267342 BOERUM, HOWARD 1999-08-05 63.11 0267343 DICKERSON, MELICIA ! 1999-08-05 38.29 0267344 VISTA IV CONSTRUCTORS INC 1999-08-05 5.70 0267345 BECKINGHAM JR, RICHARD E 1999-08-05 78.09 0267346 BENNETT, DAVID N 1999-08-05 42.30 0267347 JENKINS, PENNY 1999-08-05 30.18 0267348 FOSTER MANAGEMENT 1999-08-05 51.43 0267349 STOMAD PARTNERS INC 1999-08-05 484.46 0267350 SMITH, JEAN 1999-08-05 27.83 0267351 DRABICK, BEVERLY 1999-08-05 59.76 0267352 SMITH, AUDREY H 1999-08-05 33.53 0267353 EDEL, BRUCE C 1999-08-05 20.92 0267354 HOOPER, ANDREW ROBS 1999-08-05 _ 15.41 0267355 BOWDLE, JOHN & VIRGINIA 1999-08-05 45.58 0267356 REPLOGLE, ERIC 1999-08-05 35.74 0267357 BAZYLER, REBECCA 1999-08-05 35.75 0267358 PERPER, JODI 1999-08-05 22.11 0267359 HANSEN, GAYLORD 1999-08-05 111.40 0267360 BURCHFIELD, JOHN N 1999-08-05 51.10 0267361 ENGLISH HERITAGE CABINETRY 1999-08-05 35.40 0267362 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR LTD 1999-08-05 282.48 0267363 WESTBY, HENRY N 1999-08-05 63.71 0267364 JONES, TERRY LEE 1999-08-05 2.92 0267365 POLIDORI, VICTORIA 1999-08-05 5.56 0267366 STOUT, ALBERT L 1999-08-05 30.60 1,148,204.12 7. C. Utilides Advisory Committee - Accept Resignation of R. Savre White H The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 6, 1999: AUGUST 17, 1999 19 BOOK Ill Fr�GE BOOK lio mn . Mrs. Caroline Ginn Chairman Indian River Utilities Advisory Commission Dear Caroline: I hereby tender my resignation from the Indian River County Utilities Advisory Committee effective August 3, 1999. The honor accorded to me as a member of this very important committee is deeply appreciated. I will miss each and every member and wish only the best of everything to each of you. I hope that the progress that we as a group has made will continue within the committee and the County Commissioners. The health and welfare of the residents of Indian River County is of the utmost importance. Thank you again for the honor of serving on your committee. Sincerely, R. Sayre White H ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted, with regret, the resignation of R Sayre White H from the Utilities Advisory Committee. 7.D. Renewal of 800 MHZ Communications System Backbone Maintenance Contract - Communications International, Inc The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 6, 1999: TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Doug Wright, Director Emergency Services DATE: August 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Renewal of 800 MHz Communications System Backbone Maintenance Contract AUGUST 17, 1999 20 _I On December 15, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved a contract in the amount of $109,588.50 ($12,176.50 per month) with Communications International, Inc., to provide backbone/infrastructure maintenance for the 800 MHz Communications System for a period of nine months from January 1, 1999 to September 30,1999. Based on the above numbers, the annualized cost for the contract for the first year was $146,118.00. The contract provided for renewal or extension of the contract in one year increments for a total of five years upon mutual consent of the parties and a price adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The proposed contract renewal for the twelve months of FY 1999/00 is $144,318.24 ($12,026.52 per month). This renewal period allows for the addition of the Spectracom GPS Netclock at $432.00 per year, a remote system manager terminal at $780.00 per year, and the deletion of database management at $5,280.00 per year, for an annual contract decrease of $1,799.76 ($149.98 per month). Funding for the renewal of the communications system backbone maintenance contract is included in the fiscal 1999-00 Communications/Emergency Services budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the referenced contract with funding from the Communications/Emergency Services budget. ATTACHMENT: Copy of existing maintenance contract Two originals of Renewal Document ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the contract with Communications International, Inc. for Backbone Equipment Maintenance Contract for the 800 MM Communications System, as recommended in the Memorandum. CONTRACT RENEWAL IS ON FME IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.E. Termination of Tower Sbace Lease Agreement with PrimeCo Personal Communications The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 4, 1999: TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Doug Wright, Directo Emergency Services k AUGUST 17, 1999 21 BOOK ild- PAGE a r DATE: August 4; 1999 SUBJECT: Termination of Tower Space Lease Agreement with PrimeCo Personal Communications On July 28, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved three Tower and Ground Space Lease Co -Location Agreements with PrimeCo Personal Communications at three different locations, one of which was the Hobart Tower. On March 31, 1998, after PrimeCo had a study and survey completed on Hobart Tower (405), they determined the tower was insufficient for their needs and the Board approved an amendment to the Tower Space Lease which provided for the company to replace the 150' tower (Hobart #2) adjacent to Hobart Tower for certain consideration. The Board also approved on July 14, 1998, a Modification of Memorandum of Tower Space Lease, which correctly and specifically reflected the legal description of the access easement, lease parcel, and utility easement for the site. On July 16, 1999, staff received a letter dated July 14, 1999, from PrimeCo advising the site had become unsuitable for their operations due to changes in network design. Pursuant to Paragraph 6(E) of the lease agreement, the Company has provided the required written notice to the County that they are terminating the Lease. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of the PrimeCo Tower and Ground Space Lease termination as relates to the Hobart #2 site effective September 14, 1999. ATTACHMENT: Letter from PrimeCo Personal Communications dated July 14, 1999. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved termination of the PrimeCo Tower and Ground Space Lease relating to Hobart #2 site effective September 14, 1999, as recommended in the Memorandum. COPY OF APPROVED NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.F. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Bermuda Club Planned Development The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 4, 1999: AUGUST 17, 1999 0 22 0 TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works Direct . AND Christopher J. Kaferi Jr., P. County Engineer FROM: David B. Cox, P.E., Civil Engineer Qb- SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Bermuda Club Planned Development REFERENCE: PD -99-03-06 / 98100141-003 DATE: August 4, 1999 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS R.K. Engineering, Inc., on behalf of John Genoni, the developer of Bermuda Club Planned Development, is requesting a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement of Section 930.07(2)(d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance. Bermuda Club received special exception uselconceptual planned development plan approval from the Board of County Commissioners on April 6, 1999. The project is located along the east bank of the Indian River Lagoon, adjacent to the north property line of Sea Oaks in Section 26, Township 31, South, Range 39 East. The site is located in special flood hazard area Zone AE with base flood elevations of 8.0 feet and 9.0 feet N.G.V.D. The ten year stillwater elevation is 5.0 feet. The proposed displacement of the floodplain below 5.0 feet for which the waiver is requested is 35,493 cubic yards (22.0 acre- feet) as indicated in the attached letter from the applicant's engineer dated July 27, 1999. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided in Section 930.07(2)(d)1. of being situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the Indian River and in stairs opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance requirements can be met without adverse impact on other lands in the estuarine environment. A separate request for a Land Development Permit has been received by the Public Works Department. Alternative No. 1 Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request. Alternative No. 2 Deny the waiver request and require re -design to accomplish an on-site balance of cut and fill. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1. AUGUST 17, 1999 23 BOOK F'AGE �' r BOOK 110 PAGE X05 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the cut and fill balance waiver request for Bermuda Club Planned Development, as recommended in the Memorandum. 7. G. Atlantic Coast Enter�vrises� Inc Sand Mine Phase IV Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement Awroval The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 6, 1999: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: �c-L William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney DATE: August 6, 1.999 SUBJECT: Approval of Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement for Phase IV of Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. Sand Mine Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. wishes to move into Phase IV of its sand mine and has posted the necessary mining bonds and executed the attached Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please approve the attached Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement (SP -MA -95- 04-17) for Phase IV and authorize the Chairman to execute same. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement for Phase IV and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as recommended in the Memorandum. AUGUST 17,1999 COPY OF CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN TBE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD 24 7.H. Resolution No. 99-079 - Amends Resolution No. 95-32 to Require the Signature of the Eiiy Director on Certain Assessment Lien Releases The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 28, 1999: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: �3 C William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney DATE: July 28, 1999 SUBJECT: Amendment to Resolution No. 95-32 to Require the Signature of the Utility Director on Certain Assessment Lien Releases Resolution No. 95-32 authorized the County Administrator to execute certain assessment lien releases on behalf of the Board provided that the releases contain a notary acknowledgment and the signatures of the County Attorney and the Tax Collector. Since the Tax Collector has turned over the collection of special assessments (for paving, drainage, street lighting) to the Utility Director, it is necessary to amend Resolution No. 95-32 to require the signature of the Utility Director rather than the Tax Collector on certain of the assessment lien releases. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached resolution amending Resolution No. 95-32. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution #99-079 amending Res olution No. 95-32 to require the signature of the Utility Director rather than the Tax Collector on certain assessment lien releases. RESOLUTION NO. 99- 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 9542 TO REQUIRE THE SIGNATURE OF THE UTILITY DIRECTOR RATHER THAN THE TAX COLLECTOR ON CERTAIN ASSESSMENT LIEN RELEASES. WHEREAS, Indian River County, through the special assessment process, assesses certain benefitted owners of real property for, paving, drainage, street lighting and other improvements; and AUGUST 17,1999 25 • BOOK S PAU'E y' - j BOOK 110 ma WHEREAS, said assessments are recorded in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida and are liens against the benefitted properties until satisfied by a recorded Release; and WHEREAS, after each assessment has been fully paid, a Release is prepared, and signed by County Administrator, the County Attorney, and the Tax Collector under authority of Resolution No. 95-32 of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the collection of these assessments is no longer being handled by the Tax Collector, but rather has been turned over to the Utility Director for collection; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend Resolution No. 95-32 to provide that the County Administrator, the County Attorney, and the Utility Director, or their designees, execute assessment lien releases for paving, drainage, street lighting and other improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board hereby amends Resolution No. 95-32 authorizing the County Administrator or his designee to execute assessment lien releases for paving, drainage, street lighting and other improvements, provided that the releases contain a notary acknowledgment and the signatures of the County Attorney and the Utility Director or their designees. This resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner G i n n and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman Aye Caroline D. Ginn Ave Ruth M. Stanbridge Ave John W. Tippin Ave The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 17thday of August, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: enneth . Macht, hairman .le ~ ey K. Barton; Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM r� AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY LLr'�l WILLIAM G. COLLINS II uErui4 WUNiY AIIURNEY 71 Review and Consideration ofRevised Local HousingAssistance Plan (CHAP) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 10, 1999: AUGUST 17,1999 26 TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Obert M. Keating, AI / Community Developmen Director FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP Ca - I/,/' Chief, Long -Range Planning DATE: August 10, 1999 SUBJECT: REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF REVISED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 17, 1999. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Pursuant to the requirements of Section 420.907, F.S., the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP), and Rule 9I-37.005, Florida Administrative Code (FAC), the Board of County Commissioners approved the Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan (Ordinance #93- 13) on April 6, 1993. In June, 1993, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation approved the county's plan and authorized the disbursement of SHIP funds. According to a 1993 amendment to Rule 9I-37.005(2), Florida Administrative Code, the county must periodically submit a new Local Housing Assistance Plan to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation. Accordingly, the county's plan was revised in 1994 and 1997. On March 11, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners adopted resolution #97-16, which approved the county's revised 3 year plan for FY 97-98, FY 98-99, and FY 99-2000. The Florida Housing Finance Corporation then approved the county's revised plan on April 21, 1997, and authorized the disbursement of SHIP funds until June, 2000. The plan, however, can be amended as needed Since 1997, the plan has been revised several times to modify some of the local housing assistance program requirements or to enact some minor clean up changes to the plan. The last set of revisions to the plan was done in September 1998. The county's new 3 year plan for FY 2000- 2001, FY 2001-2002, and FY 2002-2003 is due to the FHFC by May 1, 2000. To meet the May 1, 2000 submittal requirement, county staff has prepared a revised Local Housing Assistance Plan. A copy of that plan is on file in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Since its initial adoption in 1993, the county's Local Housing Assistance Plan has been successful in providing assistance to the eligible households. The following table indicates the SHIP allocations and number of loans given to eligible applicants by fiscal year and by income category. AUGUST 17,1999 27 UDUK 110 rn.E X08 r BOOK i1 SHIP PROGRAM REPORT FY I OUNT OF HIP FUNDINGAPPROVED state fending n1y) OF LOANS # AND % OF LOANS APPROVED BY INCOME CATEGORY VL1 10/0 I % % 2-93 250,000.00 41 13 31.71117 41.66 111 6.83 3-94 250,000.00 37 12 32.43118 48.65 6 18.92 495 250,000.00 0 11 36.67113 43.33 6 20.00 5-96 565,773.00 58 19 32.76135 60.34 4 6.90 6-97 632,136.00 74 35 47.3034 45.95 5 6.76 7-98 622,455.00 65 22 33.8536 55.38 7 110.77 8-99 YTD 903,723.00 58 21 06.21 4 58.62 3 5.17 9-2000 750,775.00 OTAL k4,224,862.00 63 1133 b6.641187 1.52 143 11.85 icer. iiiaiya VLI: Very Low Income LI: Low Income MI: Moderate Income The new plan basically will be a continuation of the county's existing plan with only minor changes. In the revised plan, additions to the existing plan are shown as underlined, and deletions are shown as eke-thn As proposed, the new plan encompasses updated income information and projected expenditures for the new fiscal years. While no new assistance strategies are proposed, one plan revision will expand the impact fee loan strategy to cover moderate income households. The existing plan provides impact fee loans only to very low and low income households. No other substantive changes are proposed. As drafted, the proposed plan meets all state and local requirements. Once adopted and approved by the state, the Local Housing Assistance Plan will provide the basic fiamework and operating procedures for the SHIP program for FY2000-2001, FY 2001-2002, and FY 2002-2003. This includes SHIP program strategy qualification requirements and other provisions . With respect to the new 3 year Local Housing Assistance Plan, the Board of County Commissioners has three alternatives. These are: adopt the new plan adopt the new plan with changes reject the new plan Staff supports either of the first two alternatives. AUGUST 17, 1999 28 • C� Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution approving the new Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan, authorize the chairman to sign the certification page of the plan, and direct staff to submit two copies of the new plan to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation for its review and approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. A copy of the new Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan for FY 2000-2001, FY 2001-2002, and FY 2002-2003 (on file at the Board office) 2. Copy of the resolution approving the new plan 3. Copy of the plan's certification page ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 99-080 approving the County's Local Housing Assistance Plan for FY 2000-20012 2001-2002, and 2002-2003. RESOLUTION No 99 -.$CL A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA APPROVING; THE COUNTY'S LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR FY 2000-2001, 2001-2002, AND 2002-2003. WHEREAS, Chapter 420, Florida Statutes, describes the State Housing Initiative Partnership Program (SHIP), and states that the principal objective of that program is to increase the amount of affordable housing within the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 1993, Indian River County approved ordinance number 93-13, establishing the Local Housing Assistance Program; and WHEREAS, the current county's Local Housing Assistance plan expires on June 30, 2000; and WHEREAS, The county's current Local Housing Assistance Plan adequately addresses the county's affordable housing needs; and WHEREAS, The new plan is basically an extension of the county's existing Local Housing Assistance Plan; and WHEREAS, on August 24th, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners considered proposed amendments to the county's Local Housing Assistance Plan; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners AUGUST 17, 1999 29 pr UUUf1 �1 }- ��^. n .� Of =ndian River County, Florida that: Section 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety Section 2. The attached Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan for FY 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003 is hereby approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Section 3. The Board of County Commissioners directs staff to submit two copies of the Indian River County Local Housing Assistance Plan to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation by certified mail. A minimum of one of the two copies shall bear the original signature of the authorized official. Section 4. The county shall continue utilizing ten percent (10%) of the state SHIP allocation for administration of the SHIP program. Section 5. The county's maximum assistance from SHIP funds could be thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000.00) per unit, and the average assistance will be fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) per unit. Section 6. The following table indicates the average and maximum per unit SHIP funds allowable for each strategy: STRATEGY AVERAGE LOAN AMOUNT MA%IMUM LOAN AMOUNT (S) (S) Impact Fee Grant 5,000.00 7,500.00 Impact Fee Loan 5,000.00 7,500.00 Downpayment/Closing 10,000.00 15,000.00 Cost Loan Rehabilitation Loan 14,000.00 20,000.00 Rehabilitation Grant 14,000.00 20,000.00 Land Acquisition 7,500.00 10,000.00 Loan Land Bank -Market 7,500.00 10,000.00 Purchase Loan Land Bank -Tax Deed 7,500.00 10,000.00 Purchase Loan AUGUST 17, 1999 17J 30 0 • The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Ginn , and seconded by Commissioner -Adams and being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman, Kenneth R. Macht Aye Vice Chairman, Fran Adams Ave Commissioner, Caroline D. Ginn Ccmmissioner, Ruth Stanbridge AU Commissioner, John Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 48 day of A,.:gust, 1999. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County By: 4erninethR. Macht, Chairman �t)� Jeffrey Barton, Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SIIFFICIBNCY BY: William G. Collins, II Deputy County Attorney u\v\h\housing.res (CLERK'S NOTE: ATTACHMENT (per Sec. 2 above) IS ON FII.E WITH THE RESOLUTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD.) 7.J. Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDPI Annual Report (1998-1999) Approval The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 9, 1999: AUGUST 17, 1999 L- 31 • BOOK 'L `+ rA11E j 1 TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator 7DION'.1HEAD CONCURRENCE � —7 Robert M. Keating, Community Developme i Di or THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Peter J. Radke �Q Economic Development Planner DATE: August 09, 1999 RE: APPROVAL OF THE OVERALL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (OEDP) ANNUAL REPORT (1998-99) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 17, 1999. In 1984, Indian River County was contacted by the federal government and informed that, because of its consistently higher than average unemployment rate, the county was eligible for assistance under the Economic Development Act. In order to qualify for this assistance, Indian River County created an Overall Economic Development Plan Committee, prepared an economic development plan, and established a set of strategies for implementing this plan. This Plan was prepared as a cooperative effort of county government and citizens in the community for the purpose of promoting economic growth and attracting qualified, desirable types of businesses to the county. The Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDP) was originally adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in June of 1985. On July 31, 1985, the Economic Development Administration (EDA) designated Indian River County as a Title IV Redevelopment Area, a designation which qualifies the county to apply for federal funds for economic development projects. Subsequently, representatives from the OEDP Committee along with selected members of the county's Economic Development Committee were chosen to form the Economic Development Council (EDC). Consequently, the Economic Development Council functions as the County's OEDP Committee and, therefore, is responsible for the implementation of the OEDP. On October 28, 1997, the revised Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDP) was reviewed and approved by the county's Economic Development Council. The Board of County Commissioners then approved the revised OEDP 0 its meeting of November, 18, 1997, and a copy of the revised OEDP was forwarded to the Economic Development Administration. Except for the introduction section, the revised OEDP contains the same existing conditions, analysis, and goals, objectives and policies sections as found in the Economic Development Element of the county's Comprehensive Plan. To maintain its redevelopment area designation, Indian River County has had to prepare an OEDP Annual Report and submit this report to the EDA on an annual basis. An annual report has been completed by the county each year since the 1985 approval of its OEDP. AUGUST 17, 1999 32 0 0 On July 27, 1999, the Economic Development Council voted 10-0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the OEDP Annual Report (1998-99) and direct staff to forward the annual report to the Economic Development Administration (EDA). The OEDP Annual Report addresses the period from July 1, 1998 to June 30, 1999. This report outlines the progress that the county made during that period in implementing the OEDP and discusses trends in Indian River County's economy. In addition, the annual report presents the goal, objectives and policies of the OEDP, and the OEDP implementation matrix. U Based on the analysis conducted, staff and the Economic Development Council recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Overall Economic Development Plan Annual Report and direct staff to forward the annual report to the Economic Development Administration (EDA). 1. OEDP Annual Report (1998/99) ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the Overall Economic Development Plan Annual Report and directed staff to forward the annual report to the Economic Development Administration, Memorandum. as recommended in the 7.K. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 9, 1999: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney I DATE: August 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors for the weeks of July 27, 1999 and August 2, 1999. Listed below are the vendors names and the amount of each court related costs. AUGUST 17, 1999 33 1 i BOOK P>iGr. r Linda Copeland Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D. Linda Copeland Linda Copeland Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D. Wanda Bethea, Ed. D. Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D. Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D. Elizabeth S. Brooker, Esq. Sheila I. Flinn Linda Copeland Celeste L. Hartsfield Patricia B. Held Linda Copeland Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D. Robert E. Lockwood, Clerk James T. Long, Esq. James T. Long, Esq. James T. Long, Esq. James G. Harpring, Esq. Hammond & Smith, Esq. Kenneth L. Director, M.D. G. Russell Petersen, Esq. Kevin MacWilliams, Esq. Peggy Gollnick Karen M. Orlando Karen M. Orlando Peggy Gollnick Peggy Gollnick Linda Copeland Peggy Gollnick Linda Copeland Robert Sloan Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D. Peggy Gollnick Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D. Peggy Gollnick Peggy Gollnick Celeste L. Hartsfield Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D. Total cc: Judge Kanarek Transcription Clinical Evaluation Transcription Transcription Clinical Evaluation Clinical Evaluation Clinical Evaluation Clinical Evaluation Indigent Dependency Case Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Clinical Evaluation State Attorney Costs Public Defender Conflict -Felony Public Defender Conflict -Juvenile Public Defender Conflict-Misd. Public Defender Conflict -Appeal Indigent Dependency Case Expert Witness Probate Legal Services Indigent Dependency Case Transcription i Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Witness Management Clinical Evaluation Transcription Clinical Evaluation Transcription Transcription Transcription ClinicalEvalu . n APPROVED FOR B.C.G h'ET i� J i % CON E T AGENDA COUNTY ATTORNEY NO ACTION REQLM ED OR TAKEN. BOOK LO FAGS 52.50 500.00 84.00 73.50 500.00 450.00 500.00 500.00 1,039.20 227.50 21.00 175.00 66.50 52.50 500.00 2.00 3,000.00 600.00 900.00 660.00 1,900.00 200.00 736.50 2,235.00 21.00 28.00 42.00 147.00 14.00 91.00 227.50 52.50 108.18 500.00 423.50 500.00 87.50 119.00 98.00 500.00 $17,934.38 U. Out -of -County Travel for Commissioner Stanbridge - St. Johns River Steering Committee and American Heritage River Program The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 1999: AUGUST 17, 1999 34 1] • DATE: August 11, 1999 TO: Members, Indian River County Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ruth Stanbridge, County Commissioner J 0� SUBJECT: American Heritage River Steering Committee I have been asked to be part of the St. Johns River Steering Committee and the American Heritage River Program. This Steering Committee will have members representing the entire length of the St. Johns and their role will be to develop the overall vision and goals for the River, set priorities for federal assistance based upon input from the advisory committees, and foster partnerships between the basins. The first meeting is scheduled in September and at that meeting a Chairperson will be elected, a vision contemplated, policies and procedures established, and a project plan developed. I would like permission to attend this meeting and any others that will be necessary for our County to play a positive and productive role in protecting and preserving the St. Johns River. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved out -of - county travel for Commissioner Stanbridge to attend meetings of the St. Johns River Steering Committee and American Heritage River Program, as requested in the Memorandum. 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO.99-081- EARRING POINT GROVES REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF 87TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE WABASSO AREA (Legislative) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 1999: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D SION HEAD CONC&RENCE: Robert M. Keating, CP Community Developmenterector THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director AUGUST 17, 1999 35 BOOK L • BOOK �.� Fr1'E L FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP !. (� Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: August 11, 1999 SUBJECT: Earring Point Groves Request for Abandonment of a portion of 87`6 Street Right -of -Way in the Wabasso Area It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 17, 1999. � 1MIN_ Earring Point Groves has submitted a petition to abandon a portion of "excess" 87th Street right-of- way located on the south side of 87th Street between US #1 and CR 510. The subject "excess" right- of-way extends south from the principal alignment of 87th Street into a parcel that is located between US #1 and CR 510 (see attachment #2). Recently, the Board of County Commissioners approved Christ Presbyterian Church's request for special exception use and conceptual site plan approval to construct a church on that parcel. The approved conceptual plan proposes use of the to -be - abandoned right-of-way and is conditioned upon abandonment of the subject right-of-way. The subject right-of-way measures 19.04' deep at the west end by 434' long by 68' deep at the east end. The applicant is requesting that the subject segment of right-of-way be abandoned to make the subject site more developable. If the right-of-way is abandoned, it will be added to the property south of 87th Street that is under contract to the church. The Board of County Commissioners is now to consider the abandonment request. The subject "excess" right-of-way area has never been used for 87th Street roadway purposes and is presently planted in citrus. If this right-of-way were abandoned in its entirety, a 50' wide righf-of- way would remain for the section of 87th Street that fronts the subject parcel. This segment of 87th Street is classified as a local road, which requires a total 60' of right-of-way, and 5' of the strip of right-of-way that is to be abandoned is part of the overall 60' needed for 87th Street right-of-way. Therefore, in accordance with the LDW s, the Public Works Department has recommended that a 5' wide drainage, utilities, and roadway easement be retained. Retaining such an easement will make this request of 87th Street right-of-way conform to the county's local road standard. Per guidelines established by the Board of County Commissioners, this petition was reviewed by all county divisions and utility providers having jurisdiction or potential interests within the right-of- way. In addition, per county regulations, adjacent property owners were notified by mail prior to staff s application review meeting (the Technical Review Committee meeting of June 21, 1999). No objections have been received from any adjacent property owner. All reviewing agencies and departments have recommended approval of the requested abandonment, with the condition that an easement for utilities, drainage, and roadway use be reserved over the north 5' of the abandoned area. The subject right-of-way is not part of the roadway system as noted on the County Thoroughfare Plan, and is not needed for the thoroughfare I system. Furthermore, the abandonment would not affect the right of convenient access to surrounding properties. Also, the County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the attached abandonment resolution for legal form and sufficiency. AUGUST 17,1999 36 0 Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners abandon its rights to the subject right-of-way and authorize the chairman to execute the attached abandonment resolution, with the following condition: 1. That a 5' wide drainage, utility, and roadway easement be reserved .over the north 5' of the area requested to be abandoned. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Resolution Planning Director Stan Boling advised that Exhibit `B" from the backup on Page 97 had been replaced; it refers to the 5' easement that will be retained. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if, anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 99-08lproviding for the closing, abandonment, vacation and discontinuance of a portion of 87' Street right-of- way and reserving a 5' wide drainage, utility, and roadway easement over a portion of the abandoned right-of-way. RESOLUTION NO. 99- 81 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING, ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF A PORTION OF 87"; STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND RESERVING 5' WIDE DRAINAGE, UTILITY, AND ROADWAY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY; SAID LAND LYING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, on May 14, 1999, Indian River County received a duly executed and documented petition from Earring Point Groves, Inc. of Wabasso, Florida, requesting that the County close, vacate, abandon, discontinue. renounce and disclaim any right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to a portion of 8r Street right-of-way; said lands lying in Indian River County, Florida, and WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes 336.10, notice of a public hearing to consider said petition was duly published; and AUGUST 17,1999 37 SOUK 110 BOOK iy i h uC Wit ' WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting documents, staff investigation and report, and testimony of all those interested and present, the Board finds that the subject right -0f --way is not a state or federal highway, nor located within any municipality, nor is said right-of-way necessary for continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, nor access to any given private property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. All right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to that certain right-of-way being known more particularly as: SEE EXHIBIT °A° Lying in Indian River County, Florida. is hereby forever closed, abandoned, vacated, discontinued, renounced and disclaimed, except for a 5' wide drainage, utility, and roadway easement which is hereby reserved over the north 5' of the entire abandoned right-of-way. (exhibit B) 2. The closing, vacation, abandonment, discontinuance and disclaimer of this public right-of- way is in the best interests of the public. 3. Notice of the adopting of this resolution shall be forthwith published once within thirty (30) days from the date of adoption hereof; and 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution together with the proofs of publication required by Florida Statutes 336.10 in the Official Record Books of Indian River County without undue delay. 5. Said right-of-way shall be returned in its entirety to the contiguous unnumbered lot to the south in the Naranja Tract, Shellmond Beach Subdivison, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 23 of the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida, said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner G i n n who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d a e , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Kenneth R. Macht A y e Vice - Chairman Fran B. Adams A v e Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A y e Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 17 t h day of August ,1999. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk State of Florida Ctsft-ity of Indian.River AUGUST 17, 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: 10"kenneth R. Macht, Chairman Board of County Commissioners DC 38 I I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared KENNETH R. MACHT, and PATRICIA M. RI DGELY , as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 17 t hday of August , A.D., 1999. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY: . L .L G"� William G. Collins, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS BY: 0 Robert M. Keating, AICP, JDirecfKi Community Development bivis' n u\d\resolut\ean ing.m AUGUST 17,1999 39 Notary Pu is `' Khb" E Mossung 2003 fir. ,� .-055436 EXPIRES SAH STREET � N Qr IROAD ° Road) N BR DLE W°buss 43p 83� `'' N SCO/e. 1 a50' $Forryle& . Ep5 P.O.C. N �� 434 co NW Cor. G.L. 6 5945 E s Sec. 28-31-3 N .05 0 t*1 ri � Plat Line pp N 104'28'9"'e e Wobosso Road i N South SoundorY P.O.B. R=2917.93' A=8'30'13" :r L=433.07' T=216.93' 2 C=432.68' ABANDONMENT DESCRIPTION C.B.=S81'42'12V Commence at the Northwest corner of Government Lot 6, Section 28, Township 31 South, Range 39 East, and run S 0'26'06” E. along the West line of Government Lot 6, a distance of 25.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Then run N 75'05'45" E a distance of 434 feet to a point. Then run S 725'31" E a distance of 68.81 feet to a point in the arc of a 2917.93—foot radius curve, concave to the North, whose chord bears. S 81'42'12" W a distance of 432.68 feet. Then run Along the curve, through a central angle of 8'30'13" an arc distance of 433.07 feet to a point in the West Line of Government Lot 6. Then run N 0'26'06" W. along the West line, a distance of 19.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Subject to an easement to be retained along the Northerly 5 feet. cFRTIFI(`.ATIAN I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 611317 of the Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 PREPARED FOR INDUW RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date 11114ea /�9�9 3 0 0 3 3 0 a 5, Co Itt 11 0 • 12 2 0 C Scale: 1 =50' 8� STREET Al 82.26' ROA,) aa0pod) BRIDE Wo 45 45� tin 5° Rood �LP � F�rmeyl505'45i W� °SSO S o. N ?5'05145 IN 97'34' T 97'34' J 5, SEMEN EASEMENT DESCRIPTION The South 5 feet of the North 30 feet of the West 351.5 feet of the following described tract: An unnumbered lot in Naranjo Tract Shellmound Beach Subdivision, according to the plot recorded in Plot Book 5, 03 Page 23 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: From the Southwest corner of Government Lot 6, Section 28, Township 31 South, Range 39 East, run j North, along the West line of said Government Lot 6, a distance of 800.72 feet. Then run ^ J With an angle of 75'26' from North to East. Northeasterly 497.93 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Then continue 82.26' / Northeasterly on lost mentioned course, a distance of 450 feet. Thence 3 With an interior angle of 97'34', run Norhtwesterly a distance of 507.71 feet. Then run 7. 6' ---With on interior angle of 82'26', run Southwesterly a distance of 450 feet. Then run a With on interior angle of 97'34', run Southeasterly a distance of 507.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Less and excepting all rights-of-way of record. 3 q9 3 Now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. o I CERTIFICATION o nI, Charles A. Cromer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in the state 0 of Florida, that this sketch was madeunder my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct. I further certify 3 0 I that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 611317 of the Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472. �.W. Corner THIS IS NOT A SURVEY G.L. 6 p SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL oEscRlpMM ci 28-31-39 — PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 1840 25th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Indian River County Surveyor (561) 567-8000 Date /f Z -'fa a s g°� 1 L -J 0 Ca f 0 0 K . FrquI 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MANATEE PROTECTION AND BOATING SAFETY COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Legislative) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement Chief Roland M. DeBlois reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 1999: TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: James E. Chandler County Administrator Roland M. DeBloOMCP Chief, Environmental Planning Brian Poole Staff Environmental Planner August 11, 1999 SUBJECT: Consideration of the Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 17, 1999. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In July 1989, an interagency team headed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service developed a Florida Manatee Recovery Plan (FMRP). Within the FI W was a recommendation that local governments develop comprehensive manatee protection plans (CMPs) based on manatee habitat and boating activities. These local plans were to also identify areas where marina development could occur without causing further harm to manatee populations. On October 24, 1989, the State Department of Natural Resources (now the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) recommended that the Governor and Cabinet approve and adopt the FRMP. On that recommendation, the Governor and Cabinet adopted the FRMP, including a directive that thirteen "key" counties, including Indian River County, be required to develop comprehensive management plans to reduce manatee mortality and enhance boating safety. Subsequently, in 1992, the County and the State went through a coordinated public hearing process whereby "interim" manatee protection speed zones were established in the Indian River Lagoon and St. Sebastian River, these are still in effect. The speed zones were originally intended to be temporary until the thirteen key counties adopted CMPs, but have evolved to AUGUST 17,1999 42 -I become more permanent in nature. Local governments, however, have an opportunity to revisit the speed zone designations as a part of the CMP adoption process. For a number of years, the Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan has been a work in progress. Due to its size and boater/manatee use conflicts, Indian River County is considered a lower state priority for adopting a CMP compared to others of the thirteen key counties. County staff has now completed a final draft of the plan, having coordinated with staff of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and with the County Marine Advisory/Narrows Watershed Action Committee (MANWAC). A recent drift of the CMP was considered by the MANWAC at its meeting on June 21, 1999 (see attached minutes). At that time, the draft plan was approved by the MANWAC with minor changes. Those minor changes are reflected in the attached final draft whereby recommended deletions are represented by stmketke and additions are represented by underline. County staff is now presenting the finalized CMP for Board consideration to approve the plan and authorize its transmittal to the State for Governor and Cabinet approval. ANALYSIS The purpose of the CMP is to establish a strategy that equitably balances manatee protection, habitat preservation, and boating safety with commercial and recreational marine interests. The principal focus of this effort is the identification and implementatidn of protection and management practices necessary to ensure the recovery and protection of the Florida manatee's population. The plan is divided into three parts: Existing Conditions, Analysis, and Action Plan. The Existing Conditions section provides data and information regarding manatee habitat and mortality, boating activity, public awareness and education, and boat facilities. The Analysis section reviews the existing speed zone plan and suggests changes based on recent manatee mortality and boat safety issues. A main component of this section is the establishment of Marina Siting Zones. Future marina development will be directed away from sensitive manatee habitat and directed towards areas where marinas are more appropriate. Finally, the Action Plan details objectives and policies that will implement manatee protection and boating safety measures and provides a method by which the county can measure the success or failure, of this plan. -. Minor modifications to existing speed zones have been made based on the MANWAC review comments. In the Gifford Cut, the unregulated zone was increased in size to provide for better boating safety within the existing unregulated zone. In the Jungle Trail Narrows, MANWAC recommended maintaining the current speed zone condition. Finally, within the city limits of Vero Beach it was the recommendation of the MANWAC that the short stretch of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) north of the Merrill Barber Bridge currently designated as "slow speed" be changed to a "30 mph year-round" zone. This change is consistent with the adjacent portions of the ICW. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan and direct staff to transmit a copy of the plan to the State for State approval consideration. ATTACHMENTS ■ MANWAC minutes of 06/21/99 ■ Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan AUGUST 17, 1999 43 BOOK Pt, Or- `�' r BOOK ME 9 Mr. DeBlois also reviewed highlights of the plan, covered the main points of marina siting zones (see figure 12, page 158 of the backup), and explained that the plan tries to encourage expanding existing marinas and discourage new marinas. He reviewed the issues addressed by MANWAC, namely the Gifford Cut, the Jungle Trail Narrows, other controversial points, and explained the compromises reached. He espoused the value and need for boater education in order to increase public awareness relating to boating in the Indian River Lagoon. He advised that MANWAC had tabled the item about increasing boating registration fees the day before. After a brief discussion, Commissioner Ginn introduced Bill Moody, a member of MANWAC; she believed there was good balance on the committee and they had gone over the plan carefully. She credited that Mr. DeBlois for having done a great job. Bill Moody has used the river for various activities since he was a child. He stated that the committee had worked long (10 years) and hard to be able to present a plan which was "somewhat good for the manatee and somewhat good for the boater." Although initially against the zones because they force congestion, the committee recommended the plan because it is the result of compromise. He stressed the key issue was boater education, they have to know the rules of the river, such as manatee protection, sea grass beds, and narrows in this area. He believed small boats are not the major threat, that there is a need to slow the large boats with open propellers. He stated, for the record, that until education is forced, the manatees' chances in the Indian River Lagoon will not greatly improve. He urged the Board to approve the plan and send it on to Tallahassee. When queried how to educate the boaters, Mr. Moody emphasized that the State needs to be involved because not too much can be done solely on the county level. When a boat is registered, the owner should have to get a (boater) license specific to the area where the boat will be operated. He hoped to see a safe boating class offered to the boaters of this county and would be willing to back it. Chairman Macht asked the County Attorney to see if there is anything that can be done at the local level on mandatory education. Commissioner Stanbridge suggested the recently -formed Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission might promote the licensing/education idea, and Mr. Moody concurred this might be the time to push for it. Commissioner Ginn agreed the idea of boater education was very good and recalled that Brevard County found speed limit signs were also a deterrent. AUGUST 17, 1999 44 I • The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Sandra Clinger, KaliffAvenue, Cocoa, spoke as East Central Coordinator for "Save the Manatee Club" and as a native of Vero Beach. The club is working on manatee protection in three nearby counties and strongly endorsed the education concept and boating safety. In Brevard County, when boats are registered, the owners receive educational materials such as a waterproof map indicating the location of the manatee protection boat speed zones. Brevard County has begun the process of putting in educational kiosks at all the boat ramps. Indian River County has a similar map available in many boating -related places. Boat rental facilities are a very important place to get the message out to people who are not familiar with the area. She suggested manatee protection notices be posted in marine -related businesses. Ms. Clinger advised that the Club has reviewed the plan, supports many of the provisions, but has some concerns. Some recommendations they cannot support. She distributed charts of three zones that concern the Club. These charts pinpoint watercraft - related manatee deaths and sightings of manatees by aircraft in 63 overflights. (Clerk's Note: The charts have been placed with the backup for the meeting.) She explained their concerns with the zones at Jungle Trail Narrows, Gifford Cut, and the Barber Bridge. She stated that the criteria for expansion of a marina is not clearly defined and is not carried over into the action plan as a whole. Zone 7 was of particular concern because she thought there should be some way to exclude the warm water at the power plant from the speed zone. The club strongly advocates increased law enforcement on the water throughout the state and hoped the County would take immediate action by demanding, through the Legislative Delegation, increased on -water law enforcement. Ms. Clinger stated that necropsy results of the 20 manatee deaths in Indian River County reveal that the vast majority are impact -related as opposed to propeller -related. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Stanbridge recommended the Jungle Trail Narrows not be used for water-skiing. AUGUST 17, 1999 45 • Mr. DeBlois responded that staff had recommended that based on the State's recommendation, however MANWAC's recommendation is in the plan. He explained the point at issue is the seasonality of the slow speed restriction outside of the channel. Presently, the slow speed is in effect during manatee season, and out -of -season it is unregulated. The State and Save the Manatee prefer the slow speed year-round. Commissioner Stanbridge stated safe boating is her main concern through that narrow channel because of the amount of boating activity and stabilization of the riverbank. She agreed that slowing large boat speeds might also help as it is very dangerous in that area. Mr. DeBlois pointed out that proposed Policy 1.7, regarding siting of new marinas, in addition to the marina zones (which relate specifically to whether or not to lift the boat - slip ratio of 1 per 100' shoreline) specifically prohibits new marinas in certain places, including the Jungle Trail Narrows. Commissioner Stanbridge thought the plan was very good overall, and would support it except for that one spot which should be considered from a boating -safety standpoint. Vice Chairman Adams believed the County would be "sticking our heads in the sand" if we think the State is going to add law enforcement just by asking. She thought the Board could take an active role in pushing the State to try to get it done, but an immediate solution would be possible only at the county level. She could support an additional fee for boaters/users to pay for more law enforcement on the river. Commissioner Ginn explained MANWAC's objections to an additional fee because boat registration money has been siphoned off into the (State's) general fund and the County is not getting a fair return. Representative Sembler thinks there will be money coming down for as many as 100 Marine Patrol officers. N ANWAC was adamant the Board follow through with contacting our representatives to push for more law enforcement since the agency is now a "conservation commission". Vice Chairman Adams agreed. Commissioner Stanbridge recounted that officers of the Marine Patrol Division had left the agency knowing of the merger. The new executive director will need to decide where the officers will be located. There is a long coastline so we need to make sure locally that we get our fair share of them. The County may be able to encourage a partnership by furnishing a couple of officers and the State furnishing two, which would give us four, three more than we have now. Commissioner Ginn reminded all that the City of Vero Beach has one officer. She AUGUST 17, 1999 46 thought MANWAC choked on the fee increase because was it was 50% (or nothing). They also were unhappy about it because the money does not go where the State says it will go. Mr. DeBlois estimated the annual increase for the majority ofboats would be between $1.75 and $10, more for the larger boats. Chairman Macht speculated that if the County assumes part of the cost of executing that responsibility, the State is unlikely to do what they need to do. Commissioner Ginn wanted the Board's direction to take the recommendation to MANWAC. Mr. Moody believed that no one on the committee was totally against supporting the Indian River County Sheriff's Office and their Marine Unit. Their position, he explained, was that, due to the change in the State's agency (Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, now the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), this is a good time to go to them for what is owed us. He agreed with Vice Chairman Adams' point that it will not happen quickly. Vice Chairman Adams still thought the best enforcement is always local, especially because we know they will be here and not sent somewhere else on a special assignment. Commissioner Stanbridge believed the County should work directly with the agency and try to encourage them to provide officers to our county if they are available. We can use the leverage that we could contribute some local funds if we see that they are willing to come forth with some officers. Vice Chairman Adams pointed out the other issue to address aggressively is the education issue. She thought the kiosk was a good idea and the educational information and chart or maybe an attention -getting sign on entering the county is the answer. Commissioner Ginn stated that MANWAC will do it if so directed by the Board. Chairman Macht asked the County Attorney to investigate our local options. In response to an inquiry, Mr. DeBlois advised that the brochures were funded by a grant a couple of years ago. There was a good supply which was distributed through marine - related places. Policy 3.5 requires that by 2000 all rental vessels have boating safety and manatee information displayed onboard. Deputy Chuck Kirby, Sheriff s Office Marine Division, advised that he carries the waterproof maps onboard his patrol boat which are given to a boat operator anytime one is stopped in a manatee zone. He advised that the Sheriff's Dept. had recently co hosted a safe - boating class (40 attended) with the Coast Guard Auxiliary. They hope to have another class AUGUST 17,1999 47 6100K !I",') in the fall. Only the CGA and Power Squadron presently offer these classes. The Sheriff's Office has begun a volunteer program, 4 of the 5 members are CGA and 1 is a former PS member. The Sheriff's Office is considering having their own safe -boating classes. Commissioner Ginn suggested more publicity is needed for the classes, but Vice Chairman Adams remembered seeing notice of the class. Commissioner Stanbridge wondered if any boat rental operators attend the classes, since that seems to be one area where more education is necessary. Deputy Kirby stated that Disney Resort gives a pre -briefing but their rentals are confined to offshore, which is not a manatee zone. Also, (near Captain Hiram's) rentals are available. There have been some problems with jet ski rentals, but on the weekends patrolling is focused between the Jungle Trail Narrows and the Sebastian Inlet. Commissioner Tippin thought the committee has done a fantastic job. He reminded his colleagues that many bass fishermen would not receive any additional benefits from an increase in boat registration. He MOVED approval of staff's recommendation. (There was no second) Commissioner Ginn inquired whether the Gifford Cut zone could be modified so the water skiers would go to the other side where manatees do not swim. Mr. Moody advised that would not be a problem for water skiers, MANWAC did not intend that the eastern portion of the islands be included. They only wanted the area to be extended northward to allow for a turn -around. Deputy Kirby agreed it would not be a problem to eliminate the eastern portion. Commissioner Tippin WITHDREW HIS MOTION. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, to approve staff's recommendation but to modify the Gifford Cut recreation area zone as discussed and endorsed by the marine -related representatives. Under discussion, Commissioner Stanbridge asked that the Jungle Trail Narrows be checked in a year or so to determine whether or not the plan had been effective there for safety for both the manatees and people. AUGUST 17, 1999 W. • Mr. DeBlois announced that TerryCalleson, from.the State's Protected Species Office was in the audience. The Commissioners welcomed Ms. Calleson. Mr. DeBlois also explained an issue that had come up concerning the area north of Barber Bridge. No changes were directed. Vice Chairman Adams wished to ask some questions of Ms. Calleson concerning the processing of this plan. Terry Calleson, Environmental Specialist, 7892 Briar Creek Road, Tallahassee - Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, responded in detail as to the processing of the plan. She felt it was important for the Board to know that there is a new Commission and it is still somewhat unclear how some things will be handled. The Commission has had only one meeting. She believed there would be a meeting in October at which time their rule-making process will be formalized. She had no doubt that the County's plan was a good one, was headed in the right direction, and probably closer than any other plan in the state. She stated the working relations with County staff have been very good and they have done an excellent job in bringing the plan to this point. She was very optimistic the plan could be adopted within this calendar year. Vice Chairman Adams asked Ms. Calleson for her thoughts on solutions to education and law enforcement. Ms. Calleson advised that she had not been with this new Commission very long, but previously her agency had been very supportive of the local enforcement initiatives. She could not predict how the new agency will respond; there may very well be a re -organization. Responding again to Vice Chairman Adams, Ms. Calleson advised that only four manatee plans have been adopted to date. Active negotiations with Brevard and Indian River Counties are currently underway; other counties have had issues that have held up their plans. Commissioner Ginn understood that Revision 5 specifically states the Legislature will handle the purse strings. She felt MANWAC was correct in recommending we go to our Legislative Representative and predicted the next Legislative Session will be active. Vice Chairman Adams recalled that a couple of years ago the Legislature funded 100 additional Highway Patrol officers that we are still waiting to see on the road. In response to Commissioner Ginn's inquiry, Mr. DeBlois stated he had no objection to the changes being proposed. AUGUST 17, 1999 49 • eoa Erq;7 Fi BOOK10. FmGE j-, 3'�_ The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. There was CONSENSUS that Commissioner Ginn have MANWAC aggressively address the education issue and gave permission for the committee to contact our Representative on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners. At approximately 10:42 a.m., the Chairman called a short recess. The Chairman reconvened the meeting at approximately 11:51 a.m. with all members of the Board present. 9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM -REQUEST FROM LYNNE A. LARIIGNN, ESO. TO DISCUSS COLLEGE LANE - IRCC INTRUSION ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES The Board reviewed a letter of July 30, 1999: 831 Camelia Lane, Vero Beach, Florida 32963,, (561) 234-5565 Fax (561) "34-0461 ` July 30, 1999 - Mr. James Chandler Indian River County Administrator _ NIA FACSIMME - Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: COLLEGE LANE - IRCC intrusion on neighboring properties Dear Mr. Chandler: The homeowners of the Sixty Oaks subdivision and residents on neighboring streets are requesting that their issue of moving College Lane be placed on the Commission agenda for Tuesday, August I.Fr, 1999. l7 As we mentioned in our letter of June 2, 1999, and at the Commission meeting we all attended in June, the over 200 county residents impacted by the nuisance this road has created have felt their issue is being purposely ignored. Recent actions by the County and the IRCC only serve to emphasize that this is the case. Immdiately following the June meeting, our engineer worked with great urgency to get plans to both the Commission and to the College for everyone's review. We requested that the College and the County suspend their planning and let us know their comments on our proposals. It was the College who was in such a hurry to get this matter decided while the planning for their new building was taking place. Of course, it was owing to their foot -dragging which put us in a position of having to rush to make our changes. AUGUST 17, 1999 50 • Now we find once again that the County and the College have cemented their plans for the new building, making sure neither to let us know nor to give us any response to our attempts to resolve this matter. It is appalling that the County feels it is good business to ignore its citizens. Every resident of Tndian River County should take notice, Iand perhaps take a page from the civics book used by Frani: Zorc. If you want to do business with the County, or with IRCC, you need to sue them first. We have submitted road changes to your staff and to the College. Jim Davis tells me that he is "working un! his promised road diversion plan. Having gotten no reply from his office regarding a convenient date for returning to the Commission, we are not going to sit and be ignored again. We have paid dearly for being good citizens, and we don't intend that this will continue. August.W. 1999, over two months from our pre'.7ous meeting, ►7 should be adequate time for everyone to have made the necessary preparations for the Commission to consider our proposals. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Lynne A. Larkin, Esq. Lynne Larkin, representing the Sixty Oaks homeowners, advised that the concerns of the residents had not been resolved as they had hoped. The residents have been trying to get something done, but the process seems to be going forward without them. She hoped for some oversight by the Board of County Commissioners and suggested they look for "compromise" on both sides. Terry Thompson, Capital Projects Coordinator, gave the history and advised the college's representative was not able to attend this meeting IRCC has said the alternatives offered by the neighbors are not acceptable and do not fit into their future plans if the road is relocated. She pointed out there is a total of 39 feet from the utility easement and the edge of the street. She specified that the Utilities Department wants no permanent structures; a buffer of wax myrtles would be acceptable by the Utilities Department. Vice Chairman Adams preferred the use of a different plant material because wax myrtles do not give a full screening. Ms. Thompson suggested the fence could be moved back and a buffer added and a chain link fence could be installed to address the concerns of trespassing. Commissioner Stanbridge pointed out the grid for 16" Street was eliminated when the roadway (18' Street/College Lane) was built. Ms. Thompson specified that a signal will be installed at 18' Street (College Lane) and 581i Street as part of the 581` Avenue improvements. AUGUST 17, 1999 51 • BOOK ho rn ; ".3 -„1y Discussion ensued about the grid and buffering plants. Commissioner Tippin then suggested that Confederate jasmine would grow rapidly on a chain link fence. It would need to be trimmed once a year. Discussion was held concerning the possibilities of the college changing their plan, and Community Development Director Bob Keating stressed that IRCC does not have to go through the County for approval; however, they are coordinating with the County. Commissioner Stanbridge reiterated her point about the grid and stated further that College Lane really is not a public road. Eliminating the grid had been a suggested compromise in another neighborhood issue before them. Commissioner Ginn reminded her that the road was still offset with the drainage canal and bridge. Chairman Macht recalled that IRCC will be building a Library. Ms. Larkin believed 39 feet was not a lot of room for an adequate buffer. They would like the fence at the side of road to have a guard rail and a more gentle curve. The owners would be thrilled with a buffer such as the one for John's Island. In response to Commissioner Ginn's inquiries, Ms. Thompson advised the fence would be on the right-of-way line/utilities easement. Under the new college plan, they are talking about changing the curve which should help some of the headlight problems. Louis Schwartz, 1807 Sixty Oaks, believed the residents' concerns had been ignored and complained about the noise because College Lane was built so close to Sixty Oaks. He believed it was a disgrace that IRCC was not responsible to the County for this project and hoped that the Board would do something to alleviate the problems. Judith Lennox, 1826 Sixty Oaks, believed the homeowners should have been apprized of the college's plans much earlier in the process. Many of the residents are senior citizens and are frightened. She urged the Board to change the road somehow. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, to instruct staffto work with the property owners, to install chain link fencing with an adequate buffer, and guardrails at the curve. Vice Chairman Adams recommended that staff take advantage of Commissioner Tippin's landscaping knowledge. AUGUST 17,1999 52 • Chairman Macht mentioned St. Edwards' landscaping buffers are very dense and the neighbors are very happy. Commissioner Tippin stated he would be delighted to sit down and work with staff on the type of buffering plants which should give the desired result. He thought an informal mix would accomplish the goal, there would be maintenance later, and stressed that irrigation is critical. He noted an offer for irrigation in Ms. Larkin's letter. Ms. Larkin confirmed that the residents were still willing to take care of irrigation. Vice Chairman Adams stated she was offended by the threat of a lawsuit, and Ms. Larkin apologized saying she did not want to be in that arena. 9.B.2. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM -BECKY DIAZ REQUEST TO DISCUSS BABE RUTH BASEBALL This item was withdrawn. 9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS -NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FORAUGUST 24.1999 - CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY LLC, FALCON CABLE MEDIA AND CABLE TV SERVICE IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 10, 1999: TO: Margaret - County Administrator's Office FROM: " Lea - County Attorney's Office DATE: August 10, 1999 RE: BCC PUBLIC HEARDVIF - 8/24/99 Cable Provider Change I was recently advised that the scheduled public hearing for Falcon Cable Medics being acquired by Charter Communications, LLC, doing business in Florida as Charter Cable, LLC, has been re -set for 8/24/99. Would you please put a "public notice" of this upcoming public hearing on 8/24 on the agenda for 8/17/99? Thank you for your assistance. AUGUST 17,1999 53 • SUR The Chairman announced the following: Notice of Public Hearing for August 242 1999 to consider a request for approval of a transaction whereby Charter Communications Holding Co., LLC would acquire the controlling interest in the parent company of Falcon Cable Media. Falcon Cable Media currently holds a franchise for the provision of CATV service in Indian River County. Interested parties will be invited to speak at this hearing. NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. 9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - CANCELLATION OF AUGUST 17.1999 PUBLIC HEARING- WITHDRAWAL OF LDR AMENDMENT PROPOSAL FROM KEN GODFREY (MINING ACTIVITIES_) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 10, 1999: TO: James Chandler County Administrator D N HEAD CONCURRENCE Robert M. Keating, AIC Community Development irec r DATE: August 10, 1999 SUBJECT: Cancellation of August 17,1999 Board of County Commission Public Hearing: Withdrawal of LDR Amendment Proposal from Ken Godfrey .4• /S• FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director Planning staff has received written confirmation from attorney Bruce Barkett that the above referenced LDR amendment application has been withdrawn. Therefore, the public hearing on this matter that has been scheduled for the August 17, 1999 Board of County Commission meeting has been canceled. Please note the application withdrawal and hearing cancellation on the Board's agenda for the August 17' meeting. Attachment: Letter of withdrawal The Chairman announced the cancellation of the public hearing as above stated. NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. AUGUST 17, 1999 54 11.A. APPEAL BY PETER SABONJOHN OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S DECISION THAT THE OAK TERRACE PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVAL HAD EXPIRED Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 1999: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DI ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Obert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Dir r FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: August 11, 1999 SUBJECT: Appeal by Peter Sabonjohn of the Planning and Zoning Commission's Decision that the Oak Terrace Phase 2 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Approval and Land Development Permit Approval Had Expired. It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 17, 1999. BACKGROUND: In 1988, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat approval for the Oak Terrace subdivision. Oak Terrace is located immediately south of the Oak Ridge subdivision between the Lateral J Canal and the Dixie Heights subdivision, within the RS -6 zoning district (see attachment #2). The approved preliminary plat depicted road rights-of-way, a stormwater tract, and 42 single- family lots (see attachment #3). Subsequently, in 1988, developer Peter Sabonjohn obtained a land development permit for construction of subdivision improvements (e.g. roads, drainage, utilities). Over the years, Mr. Sabonjohn performed intermittent construction, began focusing on completion of a "Phase 1" portion of the overall subdivision (western 12 lots), and obtained extensions for the land development permit. Finally, after several years of off and on construction, inspections and reviews, final plat approval was granted by the Board of County Commissioners in 1997 for Phase 1. In the fall of 1998, the developer, Peter Sabonjohn, requested that staff inform him of what he needed to do to get final plat approval for "Phase 2", the remainder of the subdivision which would contain up to 30 lots. After consulting with the County Attorney's Office, planning staff informed Mr. Sabonjohn that the (then) 10 year old preliminary plat approval and land development permit were no longer valid and that he would need to re -apply for preliminary plat approval and obtain a land development permit or permit waiver from Public Works. These new applications would be reviewed under the current land development regulations, which would require sewer service if 25 or more lots are platted in Phase 2. Subsequently, Mr. Sabonjohn appealed staff's determination. AUGUST 17, 1999 55 FLOOR 0 pg, e L'�;, I BOOK `AF At its regular meeting of April 22, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the appeal of staffs determination and heard from interested parties (see attachment #5). The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to uphold staff s determination to require new preliminary plat and land development permit applications for Oak Terrace Phase 2. Subsequently, Mr. Sabonjohn appealed the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. In accordance with LDR section 902.07, the Board of County Commissioners is to now consider the appeal and either uphold or overturn the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. Expiration of Approvals Like most development plan approvals and permits issued by local governments, Indian River County grants development approvals and issues development permits that have expiration dates. Until a few years ago, the County granted preliminary plat approvals for 18 months with an opportunity for a one-time extension ( 3 years total). A few years ago, the County changed the LDRs to allow a 5 year, timeframe for preliminary plat approval. The new rules allow multiple phases that can exceed 5 years, but only if the first phase is completed within 5 years of preliminary plat approval. Under either the old rules or the new rules, Mr. Sabonjohn's 1988 preliminary plat approval and land development permit expired long ago in regard to Phase 2. Chronology of Events The following is a summary of highlights in the review and approval of the Oak Ten -ace subdivision project. It should be noted that many staff/applicant interactions have occurred over the years and are too numerous to reflect in the following summary. June 23, 1988: Planning and Zoning Commission grants preliminary plat approval for entire 42 lot subdivision. Expiration date: December 23, 1989. 2. December 19, 1988: Public Works issues land development permit for construction of subdivision improvements. Subsequently, some construction of subdivision improvements occurs. Preliminary plat approval remains valid for as long as a valid land development permit is in effect. 3. June 19, 1990: Original land development permit expires. 4. April 12, 1991: Sabonjohn requests through Public Works a 120 day extension of land development permit. 5. December 17, 1991: Board of County Commissioners grants 120 day extension for land development permit. New expiration date: March 17, 1992. 6. March 10, 1992: Sabonjohn requests through Public Works a second extension of the land development permit. Public Works performs inspections and coordinates with applicant. 7. March 17,1992: Sabonjohn requests final plat approval for "Phase 1" of the subdivision ( a 12 lot phase of the western portion of the subdivision). Months pass before final plat application is completed by applicant and "reviewable". AUGUST 17, 1999 56 it 0 8. August 5, 1992: TRC reviews Phase 1 final plat and issues discrepancy letter. 9. August 11, 1992: Board of County Commissioners follows Public Works' recommendation and refuses to grant the second land development permit extension until revised construction drawings are submitted to Public Works. In essence, Sabonjohn must pursue a conditional extension of the land development permit to facilitate completion of Phase 1 and its platting. 10. September / October, 1992: Sabonjohn submits necessary construction drawing revisions to Public Works. 11. October 20, 1992: Board of County Commissioners follows Public Works' recommendation and grants another 120 day extension with a condition of no further extensions until construction is complete or bonded. 12. February 28,1994: Public Works issues Sabonjohn a discrepancy letter of Phase 1 construction item problems. 13. June 20, 1995: Contractor Tim Rose submits cost estimate for work to complete Phase 1 improvements. 14. July 12, 1995: Public Works responds to Sabonjohn with discrepancy letter regarding cgst estimates. 15. August 15, 1995: Contractor Tim Rose responds to Public Works with new estimates. 16. August 22, 1995: Public Works responds to Sabonjohn with letter accepting the drainage improvements cost estimate. 17. February 7, 1996: Utility Services Department verifies that the Phase 1 project utilities are complete and acceptable. 18. February 22, 1996: Surveyor Bill Moody responds to April 1992 TRC --discrepancy letter on Phase 1 final plat. 19. March 1996: Public Works and Attorney's Office final plat resubmittal discrepancy comments received by planning and sent to applicant. 20. June 11, 1996: Public Works' inspection discrepancy comments, including problem with wash-out at Lateral J Canal bank, received by planning and sent to applicant. 21. November 19,1996: Public Works issues a certificate of completion for Phase (unit) 1, certifying completion of all required improvements except street- lights. Final plat drawings still not correct. 22. December / January 96/97: Planning staff receives Attorney's Office and Public Works final plat drawing discrepancy comments and sends them to Sabonjohn. AUGUST 17, 1999 57 0 I 23. February 1997: Sabonjohn responds. 24. March 4, 1997: Board of County Commissioners grants final plat approval for phase (unit)1. Remainder of overall subdivision (Phase 2) is unplatted and originally called for 30 more lots. 25. November 1998: Sabonjohn requests planning division approval to pursue final plat approval for Phase 2. Planning confers with Attorney's Office. 26. November 30,1998: Attorney's Office issues "tten opinion that a new preliminary plat application is needed. Planning staff informs Sabonjohn that a new preliminary plat application and land development permit (or permit waiver) for Phase 2 will be required. 27. February 3, 1999: Sabonjohn appeals staff decision. 28. April 12, 1999: Staff and Sabonjohn agree on acceptable appeal hearing date: the April 22, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 29. April 22, 1999: Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on the appeal. Appeal denied and staff s determination upheld by a vote of 7-0. 30. May 6,1999: After meeting with staff, Sabonjohn appeals the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. Staff and Sabonjohn agree on acceptable date: August 17, 1999 Board of County Commissioners meeting. 31. August 17, 1999 Board of County Commissioners hearing on the appeal. Appellant's Argument The appellant argues that most of the Phase 2 improvements identified in the approved 1988 preliminary plat and the original land development permit have been completed. In the opinion of the appellant, no purpose is served by the Ie -application. Staffs Response Staff and the county have worked with the appellant over the years, granting extensions and keeping the final plat request "alive" for 5 years until the appellant could finally adequately resolve Phase 1 construction issues and produce an approvable final plat drawing. In regard to Phase 2, however, the approvals and construction drawings are simply too old and out of date to prove useful. New applications will allow an up-to-date review and ensure that approved, record drawings are up-to- date, even though the same general layout will likely remain the same. Perhaps the most significant impact on the project would be requirements for sewer service if 25 or more lots are proposed. Based upon such up-to-date record drawings (preliminary plat and land development permit), the project can be completed and inspected on a logical basis. If approval expiration dates are meaningful, then the approvals for the remainder of Oak Terrace (Phase 2) clearly passed long ago. It should be noted that the Board, on October 20, 1992, granted a 120 day extension to the land development permit. A request now, over 6 years later, to recognize that permit as still valid is contrary to the Board's last decision on that matter. AUGUST 17,1999 58 Board of County Commissioners Review Guidelines for Appeals Section 902.07 provides guidelines for the Board's review of the appeal. Under section 902.07, the Board is to review the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision under the same review criteria that apply to staff decisions, and is to make findings in the following four review areas: 1. Did the reviewing official (Planning and Zoning Commission) fail to follow the appropriate review procedures? Response: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail to follow the appropriate review procedures. This is evidenced by the chronology of events contained in this report. 2. Did the reviewing official (Planning and Zoning Commission) act in an arbitrary or capricious manner? Response: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission did not act arbitrarily or capriciously, but acted on the advice of the County Attorney's Office and on a clear reading of old and new plat approval expiration ruleg. The developer's own inaction and/or inadequate responses has lead to the determination that re-application is required. Failure of the county to apply expiration dates would be arbitrary and would be unfair to other developers who, over the years, have had to re -apply for project approvals when original approvals have expired. 3. Did the reviewing official (Planning and Zoning Commission) fail to consider adequately the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public health, safety, and welfare? Response: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail to consider adequately effects on surrounding properties. The decision would ensure an up-to-date re- review of the proposed development. 4. Did the reviewing official (Planning and Zoning Commission) fail to evaluate the application with respect to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations of Indian River County? Response: Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail to evaluate the application with respect to the LDRs and Comprehensive Plan. As previously stated, a clear reading of the expiration rules has been applied. The decision would result in a clear and up-to-date review of the project in light of the existing Comprehensive Plan and LDRs. In summary, re-application and re -approval is required to ensure that up-to-date drawings (preliminary plat and land development permit) are used to complete the project, and that the project complies with current regulations. If the decision is overturned, the county would be acting arbitrarily by simply choosing to not apply expiration requirements that have been applied to other developers. AUGUST 17, 1999 59 LIJ _t x9illU/_o \� 1 _ Y 1 Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Make a finding that the Planning and Zoning Commission's decisiondid not fail any of the areas outlined in LDR section 902.07, and 2. Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision that Preliminary plat approval and the land development permit for Oak Terrace Phase 2 had expired and that re-application for preliminary plat and land development permit (or permit waiver) for Oak Terrace Phase 2 is required. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Appeal of Staff's Determination 2. - Location Map 3. Approved Preliminary Plat 4. Attorney's Opinion 5. Approved minutes from the April 22, 1999, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting 6. Letter of Appeal of Planning and Zoning Commission's. Decision Director Boling pointed out that a courtesy notice was sent to the neighbors and there may be persons who would like to speak to this issue. He reviewed the guidelines for the appeal and staff's recommendation as set forth in the above memorandum. County Attorney Vitunac thought this would be a very simple matter and explained the old and new rules and the preference to use the new rules. He stated that Mr. Sabonjohn had his permit for five years and it could be presumed that he had abandoned the plat, but Mr. Sabonjohn may have some arguments. Peter Sabonjohn recounted the history of his work on Phase I of Oak Terrace. He had built his development as a one-man army and as a cancer survivor. He wasn't aware of the new rules and he believed his development should have been grandfathered in. It was not fair to have to go by new rules. He stated that all work (roads, water, drainage, signs, streets) was done under Phases 1 and 2. Under the new regulations, the requirement for sewers will be a large burden. He found out that none of his prospective buyers wanted a lot in Phase.1, which was ready to be built, they all wanted a Phase 2 lot. AUGUST 17, 1999 We 4 • • ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, based on the testimony and whathad come before the Commissioners, the Board unanimously made a finding that the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision did not fail any of the areas outlined in LDR Section 902.07, and denied the appeal and upheld the PZC's decision that preliminary plat approval and the land developer permit for Oak Terrace Phase 2 had expired and that re-application for preliminaryplat and land developmentpermit (orpermitwaiver) for Oak Terrace Phase 2 is required. Commissioner Ginn complimented staff had on an excellent job. 11A EXPEND REMAINING FUNDS IN FY 1999 STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT (SLA) GRANT TO IMPROVE AND EXPAND THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WITH OPERATING AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 10, 1999: TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Douglas Wright, Director Department of Emergencyervices . C. FROM: Nathan McCollum, Emergency Management Coordinator Department of Emergency Services DATE: August 10, 1999 SUBJECT: Approval of the Expenditure of Remaining Funds in the FY 99 State and Local Assistance Agreement (SLA) Grant to Improve and Expand the Emergency Management Program Annually, the Department of Community Affairs, Division of Emergency Management administers the State and Local Assistance Grant Agreements (SLA) with each Florida.. county following authorization and funding provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These funds are used to enhance and improve emergency management mitigation, planning, response and recovery for Indian River County. On January 19, 1999, the Board approved participation in the FY 1998-99 SLA Grant Agreement and funding allocated to Indian River County in the amount of $32,456. Funding in the amount of $12,225 was allocated to Emergency Management operating accounts. The balance of $20,231 was AUGUST 17,1999 61 GOOK ['A `; retained in a contingency account for later allocation in the current fiscal year for program enhancements as recommended by staff and approved by the Board. In order to continue providing a strong Emergency Management program in Indian River County, staff proposes the following grant expenditures utilizing the remaining funds prior received and presently on deposit with the County: 1. Allocate $7,000 for the purchase of five replacement computers which meet the county Computer Services Division minimum workstation requirements and are Y2K compliant. Two of the five computers will exceed the minimum county requirements with the appropriate hard drive space, memory, and CPU to adequately support the software which is required for a number of federal, state, local, and CAD programs. This purchase of this equipment has been coordinated with the Office of Management and Budget Computer Services Division. 2. Allocate $4,000 for the purchase and installation of hurricane window protection in certain areas of the Sebastian River High School which is used as the County Special Needs Shelter to protect vital patient care areas during hurricanes or other crisis events. The protection will be provided by clear polycarbonate -Miami Dade wind load (145mph) rated panels. Clear polycarbonate panels are recommended by staff in order to allow natural light into the patient care areas. 3. Allocate $3,500 for the purchase of an automatic external defibrillator (AED) for use in the Emergency Operations Center and the County Administration Building. During emergencies, the Emergency Operations Center may be activated for extended periods. The AED allows for quick lifesaving action should a heart attack occur during EOC operations or during normal business hours within the County Administration Building. Staff recommends that the purchase of this item be from established AED vendors utilized by the Emergency Medical Services Division in order to be standardized equipment as well as consistent with maintenance and supply items now in inventory. 4. Allocate $3,031 for the purchase of blankets for the Special Needs Shelter. Currently, just under 600 citizens are registered for the Special Needs Disaster Shelter and this purchase will provide an adequate number of blankets to accommodate the anticipated volume of patients. 5. Allocate $1,200 for the purchase of ArcView mapping computer software. This software is necessary for mitigation and recovery planning. This software is also required in order to utilize the State Division of Emergency Management's "The Arbiter Of Storms" (TAOS) mapping and damage assessment software. 6. Allocate $1,000 for the purchase of a multi -task, heavy duty fax machine. This fax machine is a replacement and will be used for crisis event information and notification for many agencies and organizations along with everyday office duties and have "blast fax capability" for heavy use during times of Emeigency Operations Center activation. 7. Allocate $500 for the purchase of a large room conference call phone. This phone will be used during Emergency Operations Center activation for conference type calls involving a number of people at one time with adjacent counties, regional areas, state and federal agencies, as well as the National Tropical Weather Predication Center and National Weather offices. This special speaker phone allows for conference call capability in a large room setting using normal voice and volume for participation by a group number of people. AUGUST 17, 1999 62 L_J RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends approval of purchases totaling $20,231 for the above operating/capital equipment from the remaining unallocated funds from the State and Local Assistance Agreement Grant funds provided by FEMA through DCA for the purpose of improving and expanding the County Emergency Management Program. MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, to approve staff's recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Stanbridge noted that #5 of the seven allocations in the memorandum is for mapping software. She requested that the GIS mapping be centrally located and suggested perhaps it could be a job for Administrator Chandler's (to-be- hired/budgeted-for) assistant. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. 11.C.1. CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF TWO SURPLUS LOTS IN FELLSMERE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 1999: Date: August 11, 1999 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator From: Thomas W. Frame, Generpl Services Director a �• Subject: Surplus Lots - Fellsmere BACKGROUND: Currently, the County owns two lots in Fellsmere. The legal descriptions of the properties are Lots 11 & 12, Block 80 Town of Fellsmere. The County obtained these lots in 1972, due to delinquent taxes. Each lot is 25 feet by 125 feet. Mr. James Godfrey along with his son is an adjacent owner. He inquired into the possibility of acquiring the lots. As a result, I reviewed the matter with the County Attorney's office relative to options should the Board desire to liquidate the lots. Will Collins issued a memorandum outlining those basic options. The County could opt to sell the property by offering them to the highest and best bidder following a prescribed notice. A second method the County could choose would be to effect a private sale when the property is valued at $5,000 or less. This means of sale can be utilized when due to size shape and location and value the Board determines that the parcel is of use only to one or more adjacent property owners. AUGUST 17, 1999 63 • BOOK a Nt u �y� r T 10 Mr. Godfrey has offered $1,400 for the two lots. I subsequently advised Mr. Godfrey that I was consulting with the County Attorney's office as how to best dispose of the lots. ANALYSIS: The lots are currently carried on the tax roll with a value of $2,760, which is almost twice the value offered by Mr. Godfrey. I subsequently went to Fellsmere and drove up North Hickory Street where the lots are located. They were occupied by debris and other items and appeared to be of minimal value to any other party. Notices were sent out to all county departments to see if any usage could be made ojthe lots internally. No department expressed any need for the lots. Community Development referenced the requirement within the County's Affordable Housing Incentive Plan to notify various profit and non-profit organizations involved with affordable housing projects. A check was made with the permitting authorities in the City of Fellsmere. Fellsmere building officials advised me that the city would not issue a building permit on a parcel only fifty feet in width. Since the two lots combined cannot receive building permits, there is no need to circulate to the various affordable housing organizations advising of the availability of the two lots. Due to the physical condition of the property and the inability to build on them as an individual building site, it appears to be in the best public interest to consider authorize a private sale. The Board should sell the lots to Mr. Godfrey for the $1,400 offered following the procedure as outlined by attorney Will Collins. RECOMMENDATION: Declare Lots 11 and 12, Block 80 Town of Fellsmere as surplus property and authorize a private sale of such property to Mr. James Godfrey, provided that no more ihan one party desires to obtain the subject property. If there is more than one party desiring to purchase the property, authorise staff to accept sealed bids for the property. Authorize the Chairman to execute a quit claim deed to the property. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously TABLED the item for at least two weeks as it had not been put out for bid; and, further, to allow time to determine if the City of Fellsmere has any interest. 11.C.2. RENEWAL OF CUSTODIAL CONTRACT FOR CERTAIN COUNTY -OWNED BUILDINGS - CLEAN NET The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 28, 1999: Date: July 28, 1999 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator From: Thomas W. Frame, Gener4l Services Director '44"a J Subject: Custodial Contract Renewal BACKGROUND: Currently, Clean Net of Central Florida has the contract to clean several facilities in Indian River County on behalf of the Board. These buildings include the Administration Annex, Sheriffs Office, Main Library, Public Health (HRS), North County Offices and the Judicial Complex AUGUST 17, 1999 64 with a daytime porter. Clean Net has had the contract with Indian River County since being awarded the contract in 1993, the results of competitive bidding. The original contract had a provision for a 3% annual price adjustment. The contract was brought back to the Board in 1994, to add the newly completed courthouse facility at the 1993 values with only a 3% adjustment (judicial complex only). The price after that date was never adjusted for inflation after that initial approval. The contract was brought back to the Board in 1996, for renewal with the original 1993 prices without any annual increases. The Board renewed the contract at that time for an additional three years with no price increases. That contract is to end on September 30, 1999, with the end of this current fiscal year. The contractor has again offered to renew the contract with no additional increases over their current charges for the buildings now covered, and they have offered to maintain these prices for a three-year renewal. ANALYSIS: The County has had the reward of continuing contractual 'services with Clean Net for the last six (6) years with no significant increase form the original bid price. Clean Net is willing to renew this current agreement at the same prices as is now being paid for another three-year period with no increases for the facilities as they are now being maintained. This would give the County a stable price for the next three-year period. Any additions or deletions of work would, of course, affect the annual amount being agreed to at this time. Relative to quality of service, the county has received so few complaints regarding the work done by Clean Net, and in fact, the norm is to receive compliments. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the quoted prices, it certainly would be desir#ble to see the contact renewed for an additional three years at no additional cost. Based on quality of service provided at the County's existing facilities under contact to Clean Net, it would be very desirable to renew the contract. It is recommended that the Board of Commissioners renew the contract for an additional three- year period under the same general terms as contained within the 1993 and 1996 agreements. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Grin, the Board unanimously renewed the contract with Clean Net for an additional 3 -year period under the same general terms as contained within the 1993 and 1996 agreements, as recommended in the memorandum. CONTRACT WILL BE PLACED ON FILE WHEN RECEIVED AUGUST 17,1999 IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD 65 • POUF PA�t :_. 11.D. SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB TEE TIME RESERVATION SYSTEM - REPLACEMENT SOFTWARE - TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC. The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 27, 1999: DATE: July 27, 1999 TO: Honorable Members of Board of County Commissioners THRU: Mr. James E. Chandler, SUBJECT: TEE TIME RESERVIknQV TEM REPLACEMENT FROM: Bob Koma4!.'V)F DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Sandridge Golf Club is currently using an integrated voice response (IVR) golf tee time reservation system. This tee time system allows users to make golf tee time reservations over the telephone using their touch tone phone. This type of reservation system has been utilized at the Sandridge Golf Club since 1991. The trade name of the current system is called Golfer Automated Tee Time System (GA -17S). GATTS, a Dos based computer system, is no longer in business allowing staff virtually no support when the system goes down. Furthermore, this system is not Y2K compliant. Therefore, the system is for the most part obsolete and needs to be replaced. Staff has been researching current systems that are available. The system in particular- that would satisfy the needs of Sandridge Golf Club is called "Tee Off'. The "Tee Off' system is a windows -based, user-friendly, tee time reservation system. Furthermore, the company features 24 hour support along with free future software updates. Staff has met with the representative of the Tee Off software ( Technology Partners Inc) and had them provide an on-site demonstration of the software. In addition, both staff and the Purchasing Office checked with current users of this software, land all provided high marks as to its performance and vendor support. The Purchasing Office talked with the City of Daytona Beach (current software user) as to their selection process for the Tee Off software. Their Municipal Golf Course Advisory Board invited three software firms to make presentations and the unanimous recommendation was for the Tee -Off software. (See Exhibit A) The purchase price of the network version for this software is $13,680.00 which includes one year full maintenance and support. The hardware requirements for this network will be purchased and set up through the County's Computer Services Division. The estimated budget for the network hardware requirements is approximately $3,000. Subsequent annual maintenance costs will be paid for through the golf course operation budget. Technology Partners Inc. requires a 50% prepayment ($6,840.00) upon acceptance and execution of the attached purchase agreement. (Exhibit B) This requirement is contingent upon the review and approval as to form of said purchase agreement by the County Attorney. Upon notification by Technology Partners Inc that the system is installed and ready for use, the County is required to pay to balance due of $6,840.00. AUGUST 17, 1999 Staff recommends that the Board approve the purchase of the Tee -Off software from Technology Partners Inc, Naples, Florida and authorize the Chairman to execute the purchase agreement upon final review and approval as to form by the County Attorney. FUNDS AVAILABLE Sandridge Golf Club Renewal and Replacement Fund. Account #418-236-572-066.47 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the purchase of the Tee -Off software from Technology Partners, Inc., Naples, Florida, and authorized the Chairman to execute the purchase agreement upon final review and approval as to form by the County Attorney, as recommended in the memorandum. PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN TBE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD 11.G.1. 41ST AND 45TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS - US41 TO INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - GLACE AND RADCLIFF INC. - FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE OF RETAINAGE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 9, 1999: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P. Er— Capital Projects Manages -I -� SUBJECT: 4110 and'45#' Street Improvements US 1 to Indian River Boulevard Glace and Radcliff, Inc. Final Payment and Release of Retainage DATE: August 9, 1999 AUGUST 17, 1999 67 BOOK Glace and Radcliffe, Inc., who provided Professional Engineering Services for the above referenced project, is requesting Final Release of Retainage in the amount of $2,753.80 for design of improvements on 41 't Street and 45"' Street. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends that the Board authorize Final Payment and Release of Retainage in the amount of $2,753.80. Funding is from account #309-215-541-067.66. ATTACHMENT Request for Final Payment and Release of Retainage ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized final payment and release of retainage to Glace and Radcliff Inc., in the amount of $2,753.80, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF PAYMENT APPROVAL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TEE BOARD 11.G.2. RESOLUTION NO.99-082 - 26TH STREET (WALKER AVENUE) WEST OF 66TH AVENUE TO VILLAGE GREENPHASE III - AS -BUILT RESOLUTION AND ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE - PROJECT NO. 8528 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 20, 1999: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director and Christopher J. Kafer, County Engineer FROM: Michelle A. Gentilie, Civil Engineer DATE: Jr., P.E.,L CET July 20, 1999 SUBJECT: As -Built Resolution & Assessment Roll for Paving and Drainage Improvements to 26th Street west of 66th Avenue to Village Green, Phase III AUGUST 17,1999 68 • 0 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The paving of the above mentioned road has been completed. The final assessment is as follows: Preliminary Estimates Final Cost County's Cost $126,707.30 County's Cost $115,000.81 Property Owner's Cost $126,706.30 2% Tax Collector's Fee $ 2,534.15 Total Property Owners's Cost$129,240.45 Property Owner's Cost $115,000.81 2% Tax Collector's Fee $ 2,300.39 Total Property Owner's Cost $117,301.20 (149.09 Acres) (148.65 Acres)** $866.86867/per Acre $789.11/per Acre ** The Tax Assessor's undated records for the total acreage of the benefitted area vary somewhat from the preliminary assessment roll. The final assessment roll has been prepared and is ready to be delivered to the Clerk to the Board. Assessments are to be paid within 90 days or in 2 equal installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date at an interest rate of 7% % established by the Board of County Commissioners. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Since the final assessment to the benefitted owners will not exceed the approved preliminary assessment roll, the only alternative presented is to approve the final assessment roll. RECOMMMATIONS AND FUNDING It is recommended that the final assessment roll and the "As -Built Resolution" for the paving of the above mentioned road be approved by the Board of County Commissioners and that it be transferred to the Indian River Utilities Department for collection. Funding for the property owners share will come from the Petition Paving Account No. 111-214-541-035.51 and the county's share will come from the Local Option Gas Tax. ATTACHMENT 1) As -Built Resolution 2) Final Assessment Roll (Exhibit "A") 3) Final Costs AUGUST 17, 1999 Wel D®UK i I 9 PAGE.L 51 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Grin, the Boardunanirnously adopted Resolution No. 99-082 certifying "as -built" costs for certain paving and drainage improvements to 26t` Street (Walker Avenue) west of 66'' Avenue to Tillage Green Phase III, designated as Project No. 8528, and other construction necessitated by such project. As -Built (Fourth Reso.) 7/20/99(ENG)RES4.MAG\gfk RESOLUTION NO.99- 82 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CERTIFYING "AS - BUILT" COSTS FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 26TH STREET (WALKER AVENUE) WEST OF 66TH AVENUE TO VILLAGE GREEN PHASE III, DESIGNATED AS PROJECT NO. 8528 AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that the improvements described herein specially benefitted the property located within the boundaries as described in this title, designated as Project No. 8528, are in the public interest and promote the public welfare of the county; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 1996, the Board held a public hearing in the Commission Chambers at which time the owners of the property to be assessed were afforded an opportunity to appear before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted Resolution No. 96-93, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the property specially benefitted by the project in the amounts listed in an attachment to that resolution; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has certified the actual "as -built" cost now that the project has been completed is $789.11 per acre, which is less than $866.86867 per acre in the confirming Resolution No. 96-93, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Resolution No. 96-93 is modified as follows: The completion date for Project No. 8528 is declared to be July 7, 1999, and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is ninety (90) days after passage of this resolution. AUGUST 17, 1999 70 _I • • 2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 73/4% per annum may be made in two equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12) months from the due date and the subsequent payments to be due yearly from the due date. The due date is ninety (90) days after the passage of this resolution. 3. The assessment roll for said project listed in Resolution No. 96-93 shall be as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" to this resolution. 4. The assessments as shown in attached Exhibit "A" shall stand confirmed and remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid 5. The assessments shown in Exhibit "A", attached to Resolution No.96-93 were recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall constitute prima facie evidence of its validity. This resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner S t a n b r i d g e and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Kenneth R. Macht A y e Vice -Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner John W. Tippet Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A y e Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 17th day of August 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF IND RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By enneth R. Macht, Chairman Attest: ^rIEF,n�Ey K BART k Attachment: Exhibit "A" asbuilt.res """UbUc W0ftM bar TMftCW6 et.,bro7tacys,. AUGUST 17,1999 71 MK �k .r • 0 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 26TH STREET, FROM 66TH AVE. TO A POINT 2,588 LF WEST PROJECT NO. 8528 TOTAL ACREAGE......................................148.65 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS .... $117,301.20 COST PER ACRE......................................$789.11 8528FINA.WK4 1 0782/99 EX H I B IT "All 0 c r-, NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACREAGE COST/ACRE PRE -PAID TOTAL COST 1. Walker Avenue Club Ltd. 3132 39 00001 0150 00001.0 9.55 $789.11 $7,536.00 2105 Park Avenue North Ind. Riv. Farms Co. Sub. PBS Winter Beach, FL 32789 2)12 W 10 A of TR 15 2. Seminole Venture, Inc. 3132 39 00001 0160 00003.0 12.5 $789.11 $9,863.88 cosy $0.00 P.O. Box 2069 Ind. Riv. Farms Co. Sub. PBS $9-863,88 PP&PAm Vero Beach, FL 32961 2)12 E 13.94 A of TR 16 $0.00 AMEMMEWDUE (DMan7TRAMFERPE 1NQ 3. Walker Avenue Club Ltd. 3132 39 00001 0150 00002.0 19.86 $789.11 $15,671.72 �1 2105 Park Avenue North Ind. Riv. Farms Co. Sub. PBS N Winter Beach, FL 32789 2)12 E 20.32 A of W 30.32 A of TR 15 4. Pastore, Anthony R & Judith L 3132 39 00001 0150 00003.0 9.55 $789.11 $7,536.00 & Hammel, David G & Barbara F Ind. Riv. Farms Co. Sub. PBS 91 Belchar Drive 2)12 E 10 A of TR 15 Sudbury, MA 01776 (OR BK 490 PP 68 1) 5. Vero Beach Jaycees Inc. 3132 39 00001 0160 00001.0 9.55 $789.11 $7,536.00 P.O. Box 1671 Ind. Riv. Farms Co. Sub. PBS Vero Beach, FL 32961-1671 2)12 W 10 A of TR 16 8528FINA.WK4 1 0782/99 EX H I B IT "All 0 c r-, v w c� m ci FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS y TO: 26TH STREET, FROM 66TH AVE. TO A POINT 2,588 LF WEST �-+ TOTAL ACREAGE ................. � PROJECT NO. 8529 148.65 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS .... $117,301.20 110 COST PER ACRE........................,.............$789.11 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACREAGE COST/ACRE PRE -PAID TOTAL COST 6. Adamson, James R & Lora H 3132 39 00001 0160 00002.0 13.08 $789.11 $10,321.56 cosi $10,129.46 6760 26th Street Ind. Riv. Farms Co. Sub. PBS $192.10 PR&PAm Vero Beach, FL 32960 2-12 E 13.94 A of W 23.94 A $10,129.46 AMESSMENTDVE of TR 16 7. Vista Prop of Vero Beach Inc. 100 Vista Royale Blvd. Vero Beach, FL 32962 8528FINA. WK4 06 33 39 00006 0000 00000.2 The South 1260 feet of the North 1290 feet of the West 2577.52 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the last general plat of the lands of the Indian River Farms Company recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 25 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Contains 3,247,675.2 square feet or 74.55 Acres. Now lying in Indian River County, Florida. 74.56 $789.11 $58,836.04 cosT $15,625.00 EscRow $19,251.79 /NTERmAsoFo7-3I-99 $23-959.25 PRF-PAm $0.00 AMMSMEW DUE *ASSESSMENT CANNOT EXCEED 510.129.46 PER RIGHT -0F -WAY AGREEMENT $0.00 $117,301.20 LESS PRE -PAID 1012-2-02 148.65 $789.11 $68,892.02 $48,409.18 TOTAL ACREAGE COST PER ACRE TOTAL PRE -PAID FTOTAL COST ASSESSMENTS EXHIBIT"A" 07/22/99 • FINAL COST FOR: 26TH STREET (WALKER AVENUE), WEST OF 66TH AVENUE TO VIU AGE GREEN, PHASE III DATE: PROJECT NO. 8528 FINAL COST CONSTRUCTION Labor Outside Labor Asper Equipment Rental Sod Pavco Construction Pipe/Culverts Pittman Tractor Stabilizer& Limerock Reliable Well Drilling Catch Basins Engineering Tests Mscellaneous TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS: 3P*1 Jit FEE .•• ACQUISITION TITLE y .: • y. aM Administration 3% Recording Fees 5m. County's Cost 50'/o Property Owner's Assessment 2.0003250/a Collection Fee (50'/c Figure) TOTAL COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS: Plantation Escrow Funds at from Vista Esmow Funds rt}' OwnerdCounty Agreement 4.L PRE -PAID ASSESSMENTS: TOTAL ACRES 148.65 TOTALLY. 2,587.75 $50,755.83 $33,768.63 $2,095.32 $27,150.39 $953.30 $9,048.00 $1,083.00 $7,038.75 $70.00 $22,279.64 $2,000.00 $6,123.00 $1,618.89 $355.00 $164,429.55 $450.00 $38,265.90 $20,060.00 $115,000.80 EUUa PAGE $164,429.55 $450.00 $38,265.90 $20.060.00 Sub -Total $223,205.45 $6,696.16 $100.00 TOTAL $230,001.61 $115,000.81 $2300.39 $117,301.20 $15,625.00 $19,251.79 $34.015.23 $68,892.02 MUR41NG COSTS TO BE ASSESSED: Assessment= $117301.20 = $789.11 148.65 acres 8528FIN.WK4 AUGUST 17, 1999 74 $117,301.201 $68.892.02 $48,409.18 07r2M9 • 11.G.3. WABASSO CAUSEWAY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GRANT AND MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 9, 1999: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. 6t�'. Public Works Director Terry B. Thompson, P.Ez>'�'k Capital Projects Manager FROM: G. Sean McGuire, P.E. Project Engineer SUBJECT: Wabasso Causeway Park Improvements Project FDOT Grant and Maihtenance Memorandum of Agreement DATE: August 9, 1999 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Florida Highway Beautification Grant Council has selected this project to receive a grant in the amount of $150,000.00 for the landscaping portion of the project. The project also includes a rock revetment along the shoreline, a permanent bathroom building with water and sewer services, site drainage improvements, and low level lighting on the fishing catwalks. The Florida Inland Navigation District may grant $128,000.00, and St. Johns River Water Management District may provide $100,000.00. The total project cost estimate is $527,066.66, of which approximately $149,066.66 would be required from the County as matching funds or in-kind services. The attached "Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement" must be signed and returned to the Florida Department of Transportation in order to receive the grant. Reimbursement may be requested from the Florida Department of Transportation after completion of the project. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement. Funding will be from account #315-210-572-068.09 ATTACHMENT Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement, Highway Beautification Grant for 1999-2000 AUGUST 17, 1999 f►F BOOK9 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION GRANT FOR 1999-2000 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.GA SOUTH COUNTY PARK - PHASE II - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GRANT (FRDAP PROJECT F20023) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 30, 1999: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engineer C SUBJECT: South County Park - Phase II FRDAP Project No. F20023 REF. LETTER: Letter to Sean McGuire from Lucinda Coverston dated July 23, 1999 DATE: July 30, 1999 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Public works Department has received a $100,000 grant from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for 500/o/50% match funding for the construction of a baseball field, basketball court, tennis court, renovation of fencing for existing baseball field, resurfacing of existing tennis courts, parking and other related support facilities. The project agreements are attached for execution by the Chairman. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The Agreement requires the County to: • Keep good financial records of the project. • Submit project status reports quarterly. • Be responsible for wrongful acts of employees, contractors, etc. • Allow FDEP to inspect facilities. • Refund the grant if the County is found to be non-compliant with this agreement. • Place a sign on site recognizing state funding. • Dedicate the land for public recreation for at least 25 years. • Not exclude or discriminate against any person using the park based on race, creed, color, etc. AUGUST 17, 1999 76 • • The alternatives are as follows: Alternative No. 1 Authorize the Chairman's signature on the project agreement. Alternative No. 2 Deny the grant acceptance. RECOMMENDATIONS Alternative No. 1 is recommended. Funding to be from 315-210-572-068.65. _ F ATTACHMENTS 1) Referenced letter and Grant Agreements ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman's signature on the Project .Grant Agreement, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.5. EXPANSION OF ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING MSTU The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 4, 1999: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P . E . ,,-- .^ Public Works Director -�-n; J SUBJECT: Expansion of Roseland Road Street Lighting MSTU DATE: August 4, 1999 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Roseland Property Owners Association is requesting an additional street light at 125u'Place and Roseland Road, which lies outside the current district boundaries. Expansion of the boundaries must be by Ordinance, which requires a Public Hearing. The draft ordinance is attached. AUGUST 17, 1999 77 . BOOK �� "� J [',etc J, � �� ��V EooK PAGE. The expanded2di rict will result in additionalro erties being P P 9 charged the $1k/year MSTU assessment. The cost of the light will be approximately $150 per year. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Staff presents the following alternatives: Alternative No. 1 Advertise for a Public Hearing to expand the boundaries of the street light district approximately 300' to the west a portion of lot 35, 3 6 and 37 lying north and south of Roseland Road in Section 22, Fleming Grant). If the ordinance is approved, staff would proceed to have FPL install the light. Alternative No. 2 Deny the request. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the Public Hearing is to be held Sept. 8, 1999. ATTACE24ENT Draft Ordinance Letter from Roseland Property Owners Assoc. Map ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Grin, the Board unanimously approved Alternative No. 1, as recommended in the memorandum. (Advertise for a public hearing to expand the boundaries of the street lighting district.) 11.G.6. ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHT — GIFFORD STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 4, 1999: AUGUST 17, 1999 78 -I 0 • TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Additional Street Light within Gifford Street Light District REF. LETTER: _1) Arthur J. Harris, President, Gifford Progressive League tp Jim Davis dated Sept. 14, 1998 DATE: August 4, 1999 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Gifford Progressive League, at the request of Joe Idlette, jr. (4730 58th Avenue) , has approved an additional street light along 58th Avenue to be funded by the Gifford Street Light District. Staff has investigated the request, and is of the opinion that a light across from 4730 58th Avenue will be consistent with the Gifford Street Light District Policy. The cost of the light is approximately $150/year. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The alternatives presented are as follows: Alternative No. 1 Approve the request and instruct FPL to install the light. Alternative No. 2 Deny the request.: RECOMIENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff -recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the light is approved. Funding to be by the Gifford Street Light District (Fund 181) ATTACHMENT 1) Referenced letter 2) Map AUGUST 17, 1999 L- 79 I BOOK I� D AGE IP311 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Alternative No. 1, as recommended in the memorandum. (Approve the request and instruct FPL to install the light on 58' Avenue.) H.H. UTILITY SERVICES BILLING CONTRACT - NATIONAL BUSINESS PRODUCTS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 10, 1999: DATE: AUGUST 10, 1999 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM DONALD R HUBBS, E. DIRECTOR OF UTII,TTY PREPARED AND STAFFED JEFFREY R SMITH, CPA BY: ASSISTANT DIRL R OF SERVICES ART REISFELD CUSTOMER SER SUPERVISOR SUBJECT: U rRHY BILLING -CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BACKGROUND The Department of Utility Services had from inception until August 26, 1997, conducted all phases of utility operations. At that time analysis concluded that it would be feasible for the Department to reduce operating costs by contracting with Avatar Utility Services, Inc. to assume the meter reading responsiibdity This contract is presently in force. In a continuing effort to reduce operating costs and increase customer service, the Department has begun to analyze other areas of its administration and operations. : One such area is the independent telephone system currently being used by the Department. A subsequent future agenda item will discuss this in more detail. A more pressing area identified, however, was the utility billing function. The Department currently performs all facets of the billing function: downloading meter readings from the handheld reading equipment; processing the downloaded information; printing the actual bills; stuffing and metering the marling envelopes; and transport of the packaged bills to the Post Office with the required postal forms prepared. Our analysis has focused on where and how a reduction in operating costs and improved customer service could be achieved in this process. AUGUST 17, 1999 0 0 0 is ANALYSIS As part of the recently completed utility rate structure study, we identified certain cosi sociated with � the the entire Utility Billing pry amok in total to $477,588. Further analysis annual costs to the Department relating to the printing and mailing processes amounts to approximately $121,567 based on 23,357 pieces of mad per month (See attached itemization ExhM A). We then spoke with our current service provider for meter reading, Avatar .Utility Services, who indicated that the cost to provide printing and mailing services to the Department would range from $0.42 to $0.45 per piece. There was the option to piggyback the Okaloosa County contract with Avatar at $0.428 per piece (Exhibit B). The City of Vero Beach recently contracted with National Business Products to provide the same uft billing services. The Department contacted the City to dune the level of service requested and the level of satisfaction with the firm. The City has been contracting it's billing services for three (3) months, but indicated they were very satisfied. We also contacted Indian River Memorial Hospital who has been contracting their billing services with the some firm for more than one year and they also indicated that they were very satisfied Fran Powell, Director of Purchasing for Indian River County indicated that the prospects of piggybacking the City of Vero Beach's contract for billing services were good. Director Powell indicated that all of the County's guidelines would be met and piggybacking was a definite option We then proceeded with detailed discussions with National Business Products on our requirements and they offered the opportunity for the Department to piggyback the City's contract of $0.41 per piece (Exhibit C). The savings to the' Department of using the $0.41 per piece price would be approximately $6,651 (23,357 x $0.41x 12 = $114,916; $121,567-$114,916—$6,651). In addition to the financial savings, there are other benefits to the Department an4 the County to be derived by contracting the utility billing services. Furst, it would allow the Department to surplus its mail processing machinery and reduce inventory of paper and envelopes, thereby enabling the Department to vacate the 224 square feet of mail room space currently occupied. This space could then be used more efficiently. Secondly, the ability to free up a customer service representative of approximately 6 hours/ week operating the machinery allows more time to be devoted to the customer and a reduced burden on the remaining rimes. Another benefit is the reduction in additional postage costs. Currently when a bill is mailed and the customer's address has changed the Post Office will not forward the piece without charging again for the postage. National Business Products has access to the Postal Service National Change of Address database and can reprint the correct address on the outgoing mail before it is dehveted to the Post Office. They then will issue a report informing us of all address -changes. We have also calculated the effect of this reduction in costs on the billing charge that was approved as part of the recently completed rate study. The new billing charge of $1.29/account will be elfective on Catober 1, 1999. Exhibit D illustrates the effect on this calculated charge using the parameters in the rate model. the net effect is a $0.02 reduction. This negligible effect can be accounted for by rounding in the rate model itself ALTERNATIVES: Option 1: Continue with the Department of Utility Services performing the Utility Billing function Option 2: Contract with National Business Products for the Utility Billing Services and piggyback their contract with the City of Vero Beach at the $0.41 per piece price and reduce the billing charge by $0.02 per account. Option 3: Contract with National Business Products for the Utility Billing Services and piggyback their contract with the City of Vero Beach at the $0.41 per piece price and keep the billing charge at a $1.29/account. AUGUST 17,1999 81 BOOK jig F�iG� Baur. IS RECOMMENDATION Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt The Department of Utility e1r with the City of Option 3, contracting with National Business Products to piggyback Vero Beach and not adjust the approved bffimg charge. /c Attachments ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Boardunanimously approved Option 3, as recommended in the memorandum. (Contract with National Business Projects for the Utility Billing Services and piggyback their contract with the City of Vero Beach at the $0.41 per piece price and keep toe billing charge at $1.29 per account.) CONTRACT I4 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD B.A. RETURN OF BORROffJED RADAR EQUIPMENT BY FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL The Board reviewed a Letter of July 21, 1999: State of Florida DEPART WNT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR FRED O. DICKINSON. III F-mecutive Director TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0500 July 21, 1999 Indian River Board of County Commissioners 1840 25'. Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Commissioners: VEHICLES n�eTQ1Rt1TjON LIST / Commissioners -„✓ Administrator Attornsy Personnel Public Works Community Dev. utiiitles Finance -- OMB Emerg. SM. _ Risk Mgt. Outer _ Please allow us at the Florida Highway Patrol to thank you, the Indian River Board of County Commissioners, for the loan of radar equipment. AUGUST 17, 1999 82 This has assisted our troopers with their task of speed enforcement in Indian River county. We are now returning the last of the borrowed radar's to Indian River County Sheriffs Department. Serial # Antenna # HH16083 LA4777/LA4258 HH16073 LA4765/LA4798 HH16090 LA4772/LA4761 HH16082 LA4700/LA4781 HH25206 CC23891 /LA8132 PR25125 LA8111/CC23684 PR25110 CC23784/LA8099 PR25105 LA8138/CC23752 If I can be of any assistance in the future, please do not hesitate to call the Ft. Pierce office. 561-567-2322 RECEIVED JUL 2 81999 BOCOMMISSION rY DBUsst Sincerely, 7T(� Captain Deryl B. Loar Troop L - Ft. Pierce Florida Highway Patrol DWWONS/FLORA HIGHWAY PATROL - DRIVER LICENSES - MOTOR VEHICLES - ADMLr MAME SERVICES Neil Kirkman ftff t s 'IW WU Mee. Nwida W" -0M kUp://www.state.fl.uW hsaw/indn.html Chairman Macht brought this matter to the Board to make the point that the State had a huge surplus, yet the county governments have had to fund many of the State's responsibilities. He cited such issues as the court system, equipment for State agencies, and personnel for marine law enforcement. He believed the Board ought to resist any desire on the State's part to get county government to fund equipment or provide personnel for what is a State responsibility. Commissioner Ginn questioned why there was so much surplus equipment. Commissioner Stanbridge suggested they take these matters to Tallahassee along with their other issues. Vice Chairman Adams had no problem with sharing and helping the FHP do their work. The State funded 100 additional Highway Patrol positions; however, they have not filled those positions, so we are not seeing the results we expected. She thought conversations with the State might be productive. AUGUST 17,1999 83 BOOK " r4C. J2,2 :1 I , 6iiU� F f,'UI M.C.I. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADVISORY COMMITTEE - APPROVAL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH CREATION Commissioner Ginn advised that staff had researched and this idea for an advisory committee had not been acted upon. She asked the other Commissioners if it was their intent to form such a committee to examine all of the issues and bring back information. Chairman Macht thought it was a little early to form a committee and it should wait until the Board determines a location. He understood the current building was determined to be the "where", with the possible addition of the School Board property. He understood there had been some movement in that respect. He thought it best to determine what the committee will discuss, whether a renovation or a new building. He believed the Board owed staff some direction and the Board needed to get on with it. Commissioner Ginn asserted that if the Commissioners make a decision, then a committee is not necessary. Vice Chairman Adams pointed out that several ideas have been presented, the Board has done a lot of floundering, and none of the ideas have been firmed up. She felt the intent was to look at forming a committee of citizens and those who are interested to get ideas together, after the budget process is over as there is no rush. Commissioner Ginn agreed and understood the Board wanted to revisit this in October and pointed out that Assistant Executive Aide Reta Smith was putting together a list of all the applicants. (Clerk's Note: This list has been filed with the backup of this meeting.) ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously voted in favor of forming a County Administration Committee. AUGUST 17, 1999 C 84 Building Advisory 0 0 • 13.C.2. BEACH PRESERVATION FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY (PRESS JOURNAL EDITORIAL) Al2 Press Journal Friday. August 13. 1999 A,.Uikiorial 4< -at -10 be cddeJ -! rCIq �laurtlar � M1 Founded in 1919 �stHOWAI� "Give light, and the people will find their own way.' nx EDITORIALS No pork wave ■ Law enacted by Congress correctly places some burden of beach restoration on federal government's shoulders In a session that has been dominated by debates over budgets doomed to vetoes and mythical sur- pluses, members of Congress recently did at least one thing right: They restored federal authority to fund beach -restoration projects. Congress' action was part of a larger bill to deal with waterway issues called the Water Resources Development Act, which includes work on the Florida Everglades and the Indian River. The law would have the federal government pay 50 percent of the costs for beach projects and essentially over- turns a 5 -year-old Clinton administration policy that blocks federal funding to beach projects. Potentially, Indian River County beaches could see some money from the bill, which has provisions to help fund restoration projects on 1.7 miles of beachfront in northern Indian River County and 2.6 miles of beach in Vero Beach. It may sound like pork barrels riding waves into beach communities, but that would be the wrong impression. Federal government does have a role in these matters. Think about it first this way: What causes beaches to need restoration projects in the first place? Many, many factors have been implicated. Inlet jetties, dammed rivers, oceanfront construc- tion, beachside-dune destruction and even the natu- ral ebb and flow of beach environments are just a few examples and not all of them can be construed as "local" problems. Some of these causes, such as jetties and river dams, are federal projects or cause effects across state lines, hence the federal govern- ment has a role in reducing the. beach damage they've caused. Also think about who benefits from strong beaches. Certainly, those who reside on the beaches benefit. But so do mainland residents who use the beaches. And the tourists. And the businesses that cater to beachfront homeowners, mainland beach users and tourists. And the employees of businesses patronized by beachfront residents and the tourists. And... well, you get the idea. Locally collected taxes alone can't be expected to account for all of these groups' use of beaches. Federal involvement is a logical solution. Of course, communities still must to pony up their share, and to its credit, Congress recognized this, although it has been forced to compromise. Instead of paying 65 percent of beach projects' costs, which was the standard prior to President Clinton's moratorium, the act reduces the federal share to the 50 percent. Fair enough. The next step for Congress is appropriating money for the protects detailed in the act. Lawmakers have a job to do with the nation's beaches, and they should fulfill that duty to its full- est. Commissioner Grin called the above "wonderful". She believed that the appropriations might have to go through the Army Corps of Engineers, which may be troublesome. She felt the Commissioners ought to contact Congressman Weldon and perhaps our Senators. AUGUST 17,1999 85 �Xj�K .R _ !tM.J.,l6 to Chairman Macht concurred and Vice Chairman Adams confirmed the concern and added that it was traditionally a 7 -year process. A brief discussion ensued concerning methods of beach preservation. There was CONSENSUS that the matter be referred to the Beach and Shores Preservation Committee. A.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT The Chairman announced that following adjournment of this meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners ofthe Emergency Services District. Those minutes will be prepared separately. There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 12:15 p.m. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Minutes approved.' al 1999 r' AUGUST 17, 1999 86 s r