HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/7/1999� MINUTES ATTACHED 0
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7,1999 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman (District 3)
Fran B. Adams, Vice Chairman (District 1)
Caroline D. Ginn, (District 5)
Ruth Stanbridge (District 2
John W. Tipping (District 4)
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
NONE
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of July 27, 1999
B. Regular Meeting of August 3, 1999
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk
to the Board: 1) St. Johns River Water Manage-
ment District Aug. 1, 1999 Standard Format
Tentative Budget Submission (Pursuant to
Section 373.536, Florida Statutes) and
2)Public Facilities Update Reports indicating
no changes occurring in the Plan of Reclama-
tion submitted March 1, 1996:
a. Delta Farms Water Control District
b. Fellsmere Water Control District
C. Indian River Farms Water Control
District
d Sebastian River Water Control Dist.
e. Vero Lakes Water Control District
BACKUP
PAGES
1�
r-- E00K `t,' f'ou'r
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): BACKUP
B. Approval of Warrants PAGES
(memorandum dated August 19, 1999) 1-10
C. Approval of Wan -ants
(memorandum dated August 26, 1999) 11-21
D. Proclamation Designating Sept. 17-23,1999
as Constitution Week in Indian River County 22
E. Release of Easement Request for a five (5) -
foot portion of the rear lot drainage and
utility easement, Lot 8, Forest Park Sub-
division, Unit No. 1
(memorandum dated August 24, 1999) 23-28
F. Request to Approve Community Transporta-
tion
ransportstion Coordinator (CTC) Annual Evaluation
Report for 1998-99
(memorandum dated August 26, 1999) 29-55
G. Substitution of Manufacture for Purchase of
hydraulic excavator - Rd. & Bridge Dept.
(memorandum dated September 1, 1999) 56-59
H. Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or
Disposal
(memorandum dated September 1, 1999) 60-61
I. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 024
(memorandum dated August 26, 1999) 62-66
J. Approve Vendor List for Purchase of Com-
puter Components
Approve Authorization to Issue Blanket
Purchase Orders Over $5,000 Limit to
Computer Component Vendors
(memorandum dated August 26, 1999) 67
K. 37' St. Improvements USI to Indian River
Boulevard — Kimley Horn Assoc., Inc. —
Final Payment and Release of Retainage
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 68-69
L. SherifTs Request to Increase Corrections
Budget — Budget Amendment 025
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 70-72
M. Corrective Deed
(memorandum dated August 25, 1999) 73-77
N. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated August 27, 1999) 78-79
O. Annual County Tax Deed Applications
(memorandum dated August 30, 1999) 80-86
P. Out -of -County Travel — Comm. Fran B.
Adams
(memorandum dated August 23, 1999) 87
•
9:05 A.M.
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): BACKUP
Q. Out of County Travel — Comm. Ruth PAGES
Stanbridge
(memorandum dated August 3I, 1999) 88-90
R. Out of County Travel — Comm. Kenneth
Macht
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 91-93
S. Out of County Travel — Kimberly Massung
Executive Aide
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 94-96
T. Commission on Ethics
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 97
U. Request for Approval of Progress Report &
Reimbursement Invoice #2 for the 1999 Trans-
portation Disadvantaged Planning Grant
(memorandum dated August 26, 1999) 98-109
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Onsite Management Group's Request
for Planned Development Special Ex-
ception Use and Preliminary PD Plan/
Plat Approval for a Project to be Known
as Arbor Trace Quasi -Judicial
(memorandum dated August 25, 1999) 110-127
2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, ENLARGING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE ROSELAND ROAD
STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICES
TAXING UNIT
(memorandum dated August 30, 1999) 128-132
3. Harbor Island Citrus, Inc. Request to Rezone
±0.34 Acres from CH to CG — Quasi -Judicial
(memorandum dated August 25, 1999) 133-143
4. Mary H. Knisely's Request to Rezone Approxi-
mately 38.37 Acres from RS -6 to RM -6
Quasi -Judicial
(memorandum dated August 25, 1999) 144154
5. Roseland United Methodist Church Request
for Special Exception Use Approval for a
Building Addition — Quasi -Judicial
(memorandum dated August 23, 1999) 155-164
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
•
9:05 A.M.
ROOK frau 2
BACKUP
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.) PAGES
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
1. Public Hearing Scheduled for 9/14/99:
County initiated request for amend the
text of the Comprehensive Plan
Legislative
(memorandum dated August 30, 1999) 165
2. Public Hearing Scheduled for 9/14/99:
Tobacco Ordinance
(memorandum dated September 1, 1999) 166-169
3. Public Hearing Scheduled for 9/14/99:
An Ordinance Pertaining to Regulation
of the Motor Vehicle Title Loan Industry 170
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
1. Request to Set Public Hearing Date for
Adoption of Land Development Regula-
tion (LDR) Amendments: Wabasso
Corridor Plan and Private Piers
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 171-212
2. Request for Authorization to Initiate a
Request for Proposals to Select an Afford-
able Housing Developer to Receive a State
Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP)
Fund Set Aside that can be Used to Match
Home Investment Partnership Program
(HOME) Funds
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 213-234
3. Request from Weston Real Estate Invest-
ment Corp. for permission to relocate
gopher tortoises from the Bermuda Club
development site to the Wabasso Scrub
Conservation Area
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 235-236
4. Request for Board approval of policy
regarding non -conforming Pot-bellied
pigs in residential areas
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 237-251
B. Emergency Services
1. Presentation of the I.R.C. Local Mitiga-
tion Strategy and Authorization for Sub-
mission to the Dept. of Comm. Affairs
for Final Compliance Review
(memorandum dated August 26, 1999) 252-262
is 0
•
•
BACKUP
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'dl: PAGES
B. Emergency Services (cont'd.l
2. Contract Modification #2 to an Inter -
Local Agreement between I.R.C. and the
Treas. Coast Regional Planning Council
to Complete a Single, Unified County -wide
Local Mitigation Strategy (originally
approved by the BCC on 7/14/98)
Contract Modification #2 to a Municipa-
lity Subcontract Participant in the Deve-
lopment of a Local Mitigation Strategy
for I.R.C. for the following municipalities:
City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, Town
of Indian River Shores, City of Sebastian,
and City of Vero Beach (originally approved
by the BCC on 7/22/98)
(memorandum dated August 23, 1999) 263-271
C. General Services
Surplus Lots — Fellsmere
(tabled from BCC meeting of 8/17/99)
(memorandum dated August 11, 1999) 272-283
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Amendment No. 9 to Professional
Engineering Services Kings Highway
Improvements — Oslo Rd. to 261 St.
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999) 284-286
2. Single Source Vendor — Replacement of
Boat Launching Facilities at Main St. in
Sebastian
(memorandum dated August 30, 1999) 287-294
H. Utilities
1. Developer's Agreement for Smith Ware-
house Force Main & Water Main Con-
struction
(memorandum dated August 30, 1999) 295-305
2. Floravon Shores Subdivision Petition
Water Service —110` Place — Resolutions
I and 11
(memorandum dated August 20, 1999) 306-322
3. Petition Water Service 28* Ave. (north of
4" St)
(memorandum dated August 19,1999) 323-334
600 K
r ,,.�
8000
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd):
I. Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Request for Volunteers to serve on the
Utilities Advisory Board
(no backup provided)
B. Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
C. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Membership in Association of National
Estuary Program (ANEP)
(memorandum dated August 31, 1999)
E. Commissioner John W. Tiepin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
1. Approval of Minutes of 7/27/99
2. Approval of Minutes of 8/17/99
3. Change Order #1 to Bid #9059 -
Renovation of Emergency Services
Station #8
(memorandum dated August 26, 1999)
3. Request from Space Coast EMT &
Paramedic Institute, Inc. to Execute a
Health Occupations Agreement with
the I.R.C. Emergency Services District
(memorandum dated August 24, 1999)
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Engineering Services Various Landfill
Improvements
(memorandum dated August 20, 1999)
2. 1999-2000 FDEP Grants
Recycling and Education Grant #RE00-29
Waste Tire Grant #WT00-31
Litter Control Grant #LC00-29
(memorandum dated August 24, 1999)
BACKUP
PAGES
335-338
339-342
343-346
347-367
368-393
1
•
•
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS (cont'd.): BACKUP
C. Environmental Control Board PAGES
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who mdy wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the county's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinator at 567-8000 x408 at least 48 hours in advance
of
Meeting may be broadcast live on TCI Cable Channel 13 - rebroadcast various times
throughout the week
Falcon Cable Channel 35 - rebroadcast Friday evening
I
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 7. 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1
2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ................................... 1
5. PROCLAMATIONS ............................................. 1
6.A. & B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES .................................. 1
7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................ 2
7.A. Reports .................................................. 2
7.B. Approval of Warrants ....................................... 2
7.C. Approval of Warrants ...................................... 10
7.D. Proclamation Designating September 17-23, 1999 as Constitution Week in
Indian River County ....................................... 19
7.E. Resolution No. 99-088 - Release of Easement for 5' Portion of the Rear Lot
Drainage and Utility Easement - Forest Park Subdivision, Unit No. 1, Lot 8
(Robert L. Gaskill)......................................... 20
U. Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Annual Evaluation Report
for 1998-99 Approved ...................................... 22
7.G. Purchase of Hydraulic Excavator from Coastline Equipment Company, Inc.
- Kobelco Unit Substituted for Samsung Unit .................... 24
7.11. Equipment Declared Surplus for Sale or Disposal ................. 25
7.I. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 024 ......................... 27
71 Computer Components Vendor List Approved and Approval of Blanket
Purchase Orders over $5,000 Limit to Computer Component Vendors - T C
Computers, Micro Warehouse, CDW, Cyberguys, Southern Computer
Supplies, Inc .............................................. 32
7.K. 37th Street Improvements - US#1 to Indian River Boulevard - Kimley Horn
Associates, Inc. - Final Payment and Release of Retainage .......... 33
7.L. Sheriff's Request to Increase Corrections Budget ................. 34
7.M. Corrective Deed - Tract 8, Section 12, Township 33 South, Range 38 East -
Requested by Pointe West (Indian River Farms Drainage District) .... 35
7.N. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs .................... 36
7.0. Annual County Tax Deed Applications - 55 Parcels ............... 38
7.P. Out -of -County Travel - Vice Chairman Adams - Board of Directors
Meeting - Florida Association of Counties ....................... 39
7.Q. Out -of -County Travel - Commissioner Stanbridge - Workshop: County
Government Roles and Responsibilities ......................... 40
7.R Out -of -County Travel - Chairman Macht - Public Land Acquisition and
Management Annual Partnership Conference .................... 40
1
4
BOOK
r
BOOK h 0 F vu
7.S. Out -of -County Travel - Executive Aide Kimberly Massung .......... 41
7.T. Commission on Ethics - Executive Aide Kimberly Massung Designated
Liaison.................................................. 42
7.U. Approval of Progress Report & Reimbursement Invoice #2 for the 1999
Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant .................... 43
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP'S REQUEST FOR
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE AND
PRELIlVIDVARY PD PLAN/PLAT APPROVAL FOR A PROJECT TO BE
KNOWN AS ARBOR TRACE (Quasi -Judicial) ........................ 44
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 99-022 - BOUNDARIES OF
ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXIING
UNIT (MSTU) ENLARGED ...................................... 52
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 99-023 - HARBOR ISLAND CITRUS,
INC. - REZONE ±0.34 ACRES FROM CH TO CG (RZON 99-06-0166) (Quasi-
Judicial)...................................................... 55
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 99-024 - MARY H. KNISELY'S
REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 38.37 ACRES FROM RS -6 TO
RM -6 (RZON 99-07-0071) (Quasi -Judicial) ........................... 62
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - ROSELAND UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR A BUILDING
ADDITION ................................................... 70
9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 9/14/99 -
COUNTY -INITIATED REQUEST FOR AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ....................................... 73
9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 9/14/99 -
TOBACCO ORDINANCE ........................................ 74
9.C.3. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 9/14/99 -
MOTOR VEHICLE TITLE LOAN INDUSTRY REGULATION ORDINANCE
............................................................. 75
11.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING DATE SCHEDULED FOR ADOPTION OF LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDR) AMENDMENTS - WABASSO
CORRIDOR PLAN AND PRIVATE PIERS ..................... 76
11.A.2. AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO
SELECT AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPER TO RECEIVE A
STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) FUND SET
ASIDE THAT CAN BE USED TO MATCH HOME INVESTMENT
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (HOME) FUNDS .................. 79
11.A.3. REQUEST FROM WESTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP.
FOR PERMISSION TO RELOCATE GOPHER TORTOISES FROM THE
BERMUDA CLUB DEVELOPMENT SITE TO THE WABASSO SCRUB
CONSERVATION AREA ................................... 83
2
l l.A.4. POLICY ESTABLISHED (GRANDFATHERING) FOR NON-
CONFORMING POT-BELLIED PIGS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS .. 86
11.B.1. PRESENTATION OF LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
CON04UNITY AFFAIRS FOR FINAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW -
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL -
CONTINENTAL SHELF ASSOCIATES, INC .................... 89
l l.B.2. CONTRACT MODIFICATION #2 TO AGREEMENTS WITH
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL,
FELLSMERE, ORCHID, INDIAN RIVER SHORES, SEBASTIAN, AND
VERO BEACH CONCERNING COMPLETION OF SINGLE, UNIFIED
COUNTYWIDE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY ............. 97
11.C. SALE OF SURPLUS LOTS IN FELLSMERE APPROVED - LOTS 11 &
12, BLOCK 80, TOWN OF FELLSMERE - JAMES GODFREY (tabled 8/17/99)
....................................................... 98
l l.G.1. KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE II - 4TH STREET TO OSLO ROAD -
AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH KIM[LEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. .... 99
l l.G.2. REPLACEMENT OF BOAT LAUNCHING FACILITIES - MAIN
STREET IN SEBASTIAN - SINGLE SOURCE CONTRACTOR
APPROVAL - TEDDER BOAT RAMP SYSTEM ............... 101
11.11.1. SMITH WAREHOUSE FORCE MAIN AND WATER MAIN
CONSTRUCTION - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITH JERRY SMITH
...................................................... 102
l l.H.2. RESOLUTION NOS. 99-089 AND 99-090 - FLORAVON SHORES
SUBDIVISION PETITION WATER SERVICE -110TH PLACE
(RESOLUTIONS I & II) ................................... 103
l l.H.3. PETITION WATER SERVICE - 28TH AVENUE (NORTH OF 4TH
STREET) ............................................... 110
13.A. CHAIRMAN MACHT - REQUEST FOR VOLUNTEERS TO SERVE ON
THE UTILITIES ADVISORY BOARD ....................... 111
13.D. COMMISSIONER STANBRIDGE - MEMBERSHIP IN ASSOCIATION
OF NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM (ANEP) 111
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ........................ 112
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ....................... 112
c
EOUa J.L rivt- ?'
•
September 7, 1999
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 251` Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, September 7, 1999. Present were Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman; Fran B. Adams,
Vice Chairman; Ruth Stanbridge; and John W. Tippin. Caroline D. Ginn was absent/on
vacation. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac,
County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Tippin delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
None.
5. PROCLAMATIONS
None.
6.A. & B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meetings of July 27, 1999 or August 3, 1999. There were none.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
1
U
2
nog
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved the Minutes of the
Regular Meetings of July 27, 1999 and August 3, 1999, as
written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Vice ChairmanAdams requested that Item 7.L. be separatedfromthe ConsentAgenda
for discussion.
7.A. R snorts
The following reports have been received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk
to the Board:
1) St. Johns River Water Management District August 1, 1999 Standard Format
Tentative Budget Submission and
2) Public Facilities Update Reports indicating no changes occurring in the Plan
of Reclamation submitted March 1, 1996:
a) Delta Farms Water Control District
b) Fellsmere Water Control District
c) Indian River Farms Water Control District
d) Sebastian River Water Control District
e) Vero Lakes Water Control District
Z.B. Apn2roval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 19, 1999:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
2
•
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for
the time period of August 13 to August 19, 1999.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved the list ofwarrants issued
by the Clerk to the Board for the period August 13-19, 1999, as
requested.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0020121
FLORIDA COMBINED LIFE
1999-08-13
2,203.64
0020122
THE GUARDIAN
1999-08-13
8,141.70
0020123
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
1999-08-18
138.50
0020124
BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-08-18
963.04
0020125
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-08-18
135.20
0020126
ST LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-08-18
808.18
0020127
RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF THE
1999-08-18
150.00
0020128
VELASQUEZ, MERIDA
1999-08-18
200.00
0020129
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF
1999-08-18
5,193.72
0020130
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
1999-08-18
152.94
0020131
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1999-08-18
325.00
0020132
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
1999-08-18
75.00
0020133
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
1999-08-18
2,436.00
0020134
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
1999-08-18
84,292.12
0020135
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
1999-08-18
245.57
0020136
NACO/SOUTHEAST
1999-08-18
6,248.67
0020137
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
1999-08-18
620.31
0020138
OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REL
1999-08-18
167.25
0020139
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
1999-08-18
161.25
0020140
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
1999-08-18
23.08
0267734
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
1999-08-19
632.40
0267735
ADRON FENCE COMPANY
1999-08-19
8,640.00
0267736
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
1999-08-19
56.00
0267737
ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
1999-08-19
382.50
0267738
ATLANTIC ROOFING OF
1999-08-19
6,137.00
0267739
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
1999-08-19
252.80
0267740
ATLANTIC REPORTING
1999-08-19
183.05
0267741
ABS PUMPS, INC
1999-08-19
8,352.53
0267742
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
1999-08-19
59.90
0267743
ARCHIVE PUBLISHING
1999-08-19
493.00
0267744
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
1999-08-19
118.41
0267745
A T & T
1999-08-19
10.85
0267746
ALLIED MEDICAL SERVICES
1999-08-19
.32.06
0267747
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC
1999-08-19
69.00
0267748
ALBERTSON'S
1999-08-19
49.60
0267749
ANTHONY BAIL BONDS
1999-08-19
1,272.00
0267750
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
1999-08-19
382.40
0267751
AVATAR UTILITY SERVICES, INC
1999-08-19
12,114.05
0267752
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1999-08-19
25.50
0267753
AMERISYS, INC
1999-08-19
2,066.05
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
3
•
8 o o E. S
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0267754
ALAN DALE WILLIAMS TRACTOR
1999-08-19
0267755
AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATION
1999-08-19
0267756
ABINGDON PRESS
1999-08-19
0267757
AHEAD HEADGEAR INC
1999-08-19
0267758
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
1999-08-19
0267759
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1999-08-19
0267760
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1999-08-19
0267761
BETTER BUSINESS FORMS, INC
1999-08-19
0267762
BREWER ELECTRIC OF
1999-08-19
0267763
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
1999-08-19
0267764
BRODART CO
1999-08-19
0267765
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
1999-08-19
0267766
BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
1999-08-19
0267767
BFI WASTE SYSTEMS
1999-08-19
0267768
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
1999-08-19
0267769
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
1999-08-19
0267770
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1999-08-19
0267771
BELLSOUTH
1999-08-19
0267772
BETTER COPY CENTER, A
1999-08-19
0267773
BMG
1999-08-19
0267774
BASS-CARLTON SOD INC
1999-08-19
0267775
BACK, ELIZABETH
1999-08-19
0267776
BIG SKY PHOTOGRAPHY
1999-08-19
0267777
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY
1999-08-19
0267778
BELLSOUTH
1999-08-19
0267779
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-08-19
0267780
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
1999-08-19
0267781
CHLORINATORS, INC
1999-08-19
0267782
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
1999-08-19
0267783
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
1999-08-19
0267784
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
1999-08-19
0267785
CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY BOOKS
1999-08-19
0267786
CLINIC PHARMACY
1999-08-19
0267787
CLARKE, DOROTHEA
1999-08-19
0267788
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
1999-08-19
0267789
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF
1999-08-19
0267790
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
1999-08-19
0267791
CALL ONE, INC
1999-08-19
0267792
CLEANNET USA
1999-08-19
0267793
COPELAND, JAMES E JR, M D
1999-08-19
0267794
CLIFFORD, MIKE
1999-08-19
0267795
CYBERGUYS
1999-08-19
0267796
CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES,
1999-08-19
0267797
CLEARSHIELD OF INDIAN RIVER CO
1999-08-19
0267798
CUSTOM PUBLISHING SERVICES INC
1999-08-19
0267799
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1999-08-19
0267800
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
1999-08-19
0267801
CARUSO CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH JEEP
1999-08-19
0267802
CONRADO, STEFANIE
1999-08-19
0267803
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
1999-08-19
0267804
CARGILL INC -SALT DIVISION
1999-08-19
0267805
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
1999-08-19
0267806
COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT LEASING
1999-08-19
0267807
CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA
1999-08-19
0267808
COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC &
1999-08-19
0267809
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
1999-08-19
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
4
1,70.00
90.00
57.00
246.72
4,010.86
4,146.75
4,044.10
199.75
52.50
378.55
577.11
51.85
38.00
284.14
95.00
377.82
62.40
350.35
192.42
43.26
110.00
5.26
44.50
30.00
512.09
14,321.52
219.50
520.56
210.86
25.00
84.00
259.00
371.56
23.49
64.96
8,115.50
48.45
663.37
20,537.72
224.00
100.00
6.65
66.00
993.51
484.00
400.00
19,318.16
18,284.00
267.80
55.56
1,082.76
193.95
98.92
359.00
168.00
1,362.96
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0267810
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
1999-08-19
1,323.50
0267811
DEMCO INC
1999-08-19
260.37
0267812
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
1999-08-19
744.65
0267813
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1999-08-19
62,603.58
0267814
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
1999-08-19
4,176.56
0267815
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
1999-08-19
46.13
0267816
DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
1999-08-19
1,000.99
0267817
DELRAY STAKES & SHAVINGS INC
1999-08-19
297.00
0267818
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1999-08-19
1,184.67
0267819
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
1999-08-19
109.90
0267820
DILLON, EDWARD D
1999-08-19
300.00
0267821
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
1999-08-19
5,784.85
0267822
DOUGLAS PUBLICATIONS INC
1999-08-19
128.35
0267823
ERCILDOUNE BOWLING LANES
1999-08-19
91.50
0267824
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
1999-08-19
27.45
0267825
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
1999-08-19
225.00
0267826
EXPEDITER INC, THE
1999-08-19
138.78
0267827
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL
1999-08-19
3,450.00
0267828
ERICSSON, INC
1999-08-19
122,069.93
0267829
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
1999-08-19
5,392.41
0267830
EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
1999-08-19
2,685.39
0267831
ELITE TITLE
1999-08-19
12,298.00
0267832
ELLIS ROJAS ROSS DEBS PA, DRS
1999-08-19
676.00
0267833
FEDEX
1999-08-19
53.50
0267834
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
1999-08-19
97.44
0267835
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
1999-08-19
233.70
0267836
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1999-08-19
21,960.86
0267837
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
1999-08-19
19.61
0267838
FLINN, SHEILA I
1999-08-19
182.00
0267839
FATHER & SON CARPET CLEANING
1999-08-19
312.00
0267840
FLORIDA PROFESSIONALS IN
1999-08-19
225.00
0267841
FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
1999-08-19
50.00
0267842
FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
1999-08-19
75.00
0267843
FINISHMASTER INC
1999-08-19
363.07
0267844
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
1999-08-19
138.37
0267845
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
1999-08-19
1,578.20
0267846
FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
1999-08-19
25.00
0267847
FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR, LTD
1999-08-19
29,457.00
0267848
GALE GROUP, THE
1999-08-19
224.90
0267849
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
1999-08-19
3.96
0267850
GENE'S AUTO GLASS
1999-08-19
25.00
0267851
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-08-19
633.95
0267852
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1999-08-19
148.54
0267853
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1999-08-19
373.17
0267854
GRILL REFILL, INC
1999-08-19
106.60
0267855
GOLLNICK, PEGGY
1999-08-19
301.00
0267856
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1999-08-19
595.19
0267857
HARRISON UNIFORMS
1999-08-19
136.65
0267858
HELENA CHEMICAL CO
1999-08-19
168.30
0267859
HICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT
1999-08-19
2,618.78
0267860
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
1999-08-19
433.01
0267861
HOLMSTROM, ROBERT MD
1999-08-19
199.75
0267862
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
1999-08-19
28.00
0267863
HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER
1999-08-19
1,940.44
0267864
HACH COMPANY
1999-08-19
162.50
0267865
HARBOR BRANCH OCEANOGRAPHIC
1999-08-19
4,811.50
0267866
HARRICK, RICHARD H & DEBRA
1999-08-19
19.04
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
5
COOK
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0267867
HARTSFIELD, CELESTE L
1999-08-19
525.00
0267868
HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER
1999-08-19
64.75
0267869
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
1999-08-19
1,872.00
0267870
HOLSHOUSER, MICHAEL
1999-08-19
168.00
0267871
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
1999-08-19
1,876.55
0267872
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
1999-08-19
4,619.80
0267873
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-08-19
75.00
0267874
INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
1999-08-19
- 200.00
0267875
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1999-08-19
450.30
0267876
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-08-19
2,526.54
0267877
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-08-19
680.00
0267878
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1999-08-19
770.36
0267879
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
1999-08-19
439.00
0267880
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
1999-08-19
273.96
0267881
ISIS PUBLISHING
1999-08-19
27.00
0267882
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
1999-08-19
1,057.50
0267883
IBM CORPORATION
1999-08-19
624.16
_ 0267884
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
1999-08-19
561.88
0267885
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALLIANCE
1999-08-19
422.03
0267886
IMI -NET, INC
1999-08-19
1,350.00
0267887
INTERMEDIATE TECHNOLOGY
1999-08-19
11.19
0267888
INDIAN RIVER INDUSTRIAL
1999-08-19
315,966.10
0267889
IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
1999-08-19
95.82
0267890
INDIAN RIVER HAND
1999-08-19
1,164.50
0267891
JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS
1999-08-19
75.00
0267892
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
1999-08-19
1,373.96
0267893
JEFFERSON, RICHARD
1999-08-19
64.00
0267894
J W FISHERS MFG INC
1999-08-19
185.00
0267895
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
1999-08-19
25.20
0267896
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
1999-08-19
2,350.56
0267897
KRUGER CONSTRUCTION CORP
1999-08-19
31.60
0267898
KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT
1999-08-19
285.22
0267899
KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
1999-08-19
3,677.72
0267900
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
1999-08-19
43.08
0267901
KNAPP. JR EUGENE E
1999-08-19
500.00
0267902
LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
1999-08-19
300.00
0267903
LEAHY INCORPORATED
1999-08-19
1,743.10
0267904
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1999-08-19
1,260.87
0267905
L B SMITH, INC
1999-08-19
97.55
0267906
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1999-08-19
94.97
0267907
LFI VERO BEACH, INC
1999-08-19
5,858.63
0267908
LAPORTE, BOB
1999-08-19
500.00
0267909
LETTS, DAVID
1999-08-19
472.00
0267910
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
1999-08-19
50.00
0267911
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
1999-08-19
115.12
0267912
MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY
1999-08-19
22.00
0267913
MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
1999-08-19
23.45
0267914
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT
1999-08-19
179.15
0267915
MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
1999-08-19
1,826.90
0267916
MIAMI HERALD, THE
1999-08-19
105.75
0267917
MINER'S MARINA
1999-08-19
475.00
0267918
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
1999-08-19
23.24
0267919
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
1999-08-19
109.40
0267920
MONNETT EYE & SURGERY CENTER
1999-08-19
252.00
0267921
MARIANI, E A ASPHALT CO
1999-08-19
21,277.45
0267922
MORA, CHRISTOPHER R
1999-08-19
591.50
0267923
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
1999-08-19
103.80
0267924
MARC INDUSTRIES
1999-08-19
429.10
0267925
MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC
1999-08-19
153.10
0267926
MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY
1999-08-19
106.29
0267927
MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC
1999-08-19
72.00
0267928
MURPHY, DEBBIE
1999-08-19
273.00
0267929
NOLTE, DAVID C _
1999-08-19
170.00
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
C
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0267930
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
1999-08-19
336.22
0267931
NEFF MACHINERY, INC
1999-08-19
1,656.80
0267932
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
1999-08-19
2,321.25
0267933
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
1999-08-19
90.95
0267934
NOCUTS, INC
1999-08-19
216.70
0267935
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1999-08-19
1,314.18
0267936
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
1999-08-19
5,507.07
0267937
OCLC FOREST PRESS
1999-08-19
15.50
0267938
O'BRIEN, DAVID MD
1999-08-19
123.25
0267939
ORLANDO HAND SURGERY ASSOCIATE
1999-08-19
243.90
0267940
O'DARE, KELLIE M
1999-08-19
273.00
0267941
PARKS RENTAL INC
1999-08-19
321.50
0267942
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
1999-08-19
35.32
0267943
PERKINS DRUG, INC
1999-08-19
101.88
0267944
PETTY CASH
1999-08-19
116.16
0267945
PETTY CASH
1999-08-19
51.66
0267946
POSTMASTER
1999-08-19
66.00
0267947
PUBLIC DEFENDER
1999-08-19
4,032.19
0267948
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
1999-08-19
1,000.00
0267949
PARK'S RENTAL INC. VERO BEACH
1999-08-19
11.40
0267950
PINKERTON, DOREEN A
1999-08-19
124.85
0267951
PROFESSIONAL TITLE OF
1999-08-19
20,000.00
0267952
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
1999-08-19
1,098.21
0267953
PRECISION CONTRACTING
1999-08-19
2,310.00
0267954
PINEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1999-08-19
15.00
0267955
PANTROPIC POWER PRODUCTS, INC
1999-08-19
837.74
0267956
PIERONE, GERALD JR, MD
1999-08-19
69.00
0267957
PANGBURN, TERRI
1999-08-19
24.00
0267958
PRESS JOURNAL - SUBSCRIPTION
1999-08-19
250.38
0267959
PRESS JOURNAL/STUART NEWS
1999-08-19
2,504.10
0267960
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1999-08-19
429.12
0267961
PRESTON SPEED PUBLICATION
1999-08-19
42.98
0267962
RADIOSHACK
1999-08-19
199.97
0267963
RADISSON PLAZA HOTEL
1999-08-19
85.00
0267964
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
1999-08-19
3,153.12
0267965
R R BOWKER
1999-08-19
232.78
0267966
BAITA, SAMANTHA
1999-08-19
160.99
0267967
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
1999-08-19
3,701.06
0267968
RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
1999-08-19
43.20
0267969
R & G SOD FARMS
1999-08-19
240.00
0267970
RISSMAN, WEISBERG, BARRETT,
1999-08-19
1,228.39
0267971
RAIKES, JENNIFER
1999-08-19
907.50
0267972
RENTAL 1
1999-08-19
95.00
0267973
ROGER SHERMAN CONTRACTOR
1999-08-19
7,404.00
0267974
RASMUSSEN, ASHLEIGH
1999-08-19
332.18
0267975
ROMANO, CHRISTINA
1999-08-19
15.45
0267976
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
1999-08-19
70.00
0267977
SCOTTY'S, INC
1999-08-19
155.11
0267978
SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
1999-08-19
108.00
0267979
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
1999-08-19
89.36
0267980
SHAW, DAVID D C
1999-08-19
409.50
0267981
SOUTHEAST WHOLESALE ROOFING
1999-08-19
225.00
0267982
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
1999-08-19
484.75
0267983
ST LUCIE-BATTERY & TIRE, INC
1999-08-19
29.85
0267984
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
1999-08-19
425.94
0267985
SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO
1999-08-19
24.71
0267986
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
1999-08-19
180.00
0267987
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1999-08-19
625.14
0267988
STEWART TITLE OF INDIAN RIVER
1999-08-19
10,000.00
0267989
SAFESPACE
1999-08-19
1,250.00
0267990
SIGNS IN A DAY
1999-08-19
15.00
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
7
•
ELG�..�.�
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0267991
SUBWAY STAMP SHOP INC
1999-08-19
126.72
0267992
SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
1999-08-19
36.50
0267993
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
1999-08-19
492.71
0267994
SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
1999-08-19
4,665.78
0267995
SPALDING
1999-08-19
_ 138.63
0267996
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
1999-08-19
359.00
0267997
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
1999-08-19
279.53
0267998
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
1999-08-19
3,260.01
0267999
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-08-19
25.00
0268000
SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER
1999-08-19
3,271.03
0268001
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
1999-08-19
130.10
0268002
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
1999-08-19
502.00
0268003
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL
1999-08-19
119.00
0268004
SHIELDS, VANESSA
1999-08-19
15.45
_ 0268005
SCHWEY, PAUL MATTHEW
1999-08-19
160.00
0268006
SALTONSTALL, MYRNA
1999-08-19
386.25
0268007
SETTS, CHRIS
1999-08-19
128.75
0268008
SEELY, SANDY
1999-08-19
63.10
0268009
SRECO-FLE%IBLE INC
1999-08-19
29,656.51
0268010
SAMARITAN CENTER
1999-08-19
3,358.33
0268011
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
1999-08-19
15.45
0268012
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-08-19
2,586.14
0268013
THOMAS, DEBBY L
1999-08-19
129.50
0268014
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
1999-08-19
33,641.52
0268015
T-SHIRT FACTORY
1999-08-19
46.00
0268016
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
1999-08-19
102,416.03
0268017
TRUGREEN CHEML,AWN
1999-08-19
48.00
0268018
SMITH, TERRY L
1999-08-19
16.00
0268019
TREASURE COAST MASSAGE THERAPY
1999-08-19
91.00
0268020
TRADEWINDS
1999-08-19
1,690.00
0268021
TREASURE COAST BUILDERS INC
1999-08-19
500.00
0268022
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
1999-08-19
370.26
0268023
T C BILLING CORPORATION
1999-08-19
10,391.61
0268024
TODD, KAREN M D
1999-08-19
40.80
0268025
U S ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS
1999-08-19
29,115.00
0268026
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1999-08-19
910.58
0268027
USTLER/FAGAN INC
1999-08-19
500.00
0268028
VERO BEACH LINCOLN MERCURY
1999-08-19
1,541.00
0268029
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-08-19
43,754.76
0268030
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1999-08-19
44.30
0268031
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
1999-08-19
1,279.85
0268032
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
1999-08-19
150.00
0268033
VERO BOWL
1999-08-19
96.00
0268034
VERO BEARING & BOLT
1999-08-19
242.42
0268035
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
1999-08-19
75.00
0268036
VISION FORUM, INC.
1999-08-19
47.00
0268037
VERO BEACH,CITY OF
1999-08-19
6,416.38
0268038
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-08-19
521.00
0268039
WOODY'S PAPER & PRINT
1999-08-19
290.65
0268040
W W GRAINGER, INC
1999-08-19
75.61
0268041
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-08-19
70.21
0268042
WILLHOFF, PATSY
1999-08-19
104.00
0268043
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
1999-08-19
228.90
0268044
WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION
1999-08-19
550.00
0268045
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
1999-08-19
56,422.00
0268046
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
1999-08-19
61.50
0268047
WAL*MART STORE 931
1999-08-19
561.07
0268048
WELLINGTON HOMES
1999-08-19
500.00
0268049
WORLDCOM TECHNOLOGIES INC
1999-08-19
57.62
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
8
0 0
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0268050
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
1999-08-19
229.50
0268051
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1999-08-19
85,903.86
0268052
WOLFE, ERIN
1999-08-19
15.45
0268053
WILSON, SUSAN BARNES
1999-08-19
195.70
0268054
WARR, JAMES P, G C
1999-08-19
4,265.00
0268055
WALGREEN CO
1999-08-19
402.46
0268056
WYNDHAM PALACE RESORT
1999-08-19
278.00
0268057
WEFTEC'99 C/O GALAXY
1999-08-19
95.00
0268058
XEROX CORPORATION
1999-08-19
481.80
0268059
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1999-08-19
50.85
0268060
KENNA, RICHARD
1999-08-19
80.30
0268061
WARHURST, AGNES
1999-08-19
126.60
0268062
LAUREL HOMES, INCC
1999-08-19
30.74
0268063
IRVING, DAISY
1999-08-19
11.01
0268064
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
1999-08-19
71.59
0268065
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
1999-08-19
77.20
0268066
ZUGELTER CONSTRUCTION CORP
1999-08-19
102.56
0268067
REXFORD BUILDERS
1999-08-19
203.44
0268068
ARCHER OF VERO INC
1999-08-19
40.57
0268069
ESTATE OF WILLIE REESE
1999-08-19
64.50
0268070
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1999-08-19
15.31
0268071
MCGINLEY, CHARLES D
1999-08-19
32.07
0268072
BUTLER, CHARLES
1999-08-19
27.77
0268073
CLEWORTH, WILLIAM C
1999-08-19
73.63
0268074
VONADA, WAYNE T
1999-08-19
71.35
0268075
DAVIDIAN, YEPREM
1999-08-19
22.04
0268076
HENSICK, WILLIAM B
1999-08-19
57.68
0268077
DAVIS, JENNIFER M
1999-08-19
70.48
0268078
MASSENGALE, MICKEY
1999-08-19
37.82
0268079
JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS INC
1999-08-19
14.72
0268080
GROUND, DALE
1999-08-19
14.15
0268081
MC CULLERS JR, GEORGE
1999-08-19
13.78
0268082
GHO VERO BEACH INC
1999-08-19
131.81
0268083
SWIECA, PATRICIA & LEE
1999-08-19
41.31
0268084
ARSENAULT, GERALD & ARLEEN
1999-08-19
43.29
0268085
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
1999-08-19
69.23
0268086
TOWNSEND, MICHAEL
1999-08-19
43.51
0268087
BUCK, MARTHA W
1999-08-19
55.28
0268088
REASS, GLENN
1999-08-19
217.33
0268089
DEAN, SHANNON & AMBER
1999-08-19
28.57
0268090
TILLMAN, LUCILE
1999-08-19
21.02
0268091
COLVIN, PAT
1999-08-19
37.71
0268092
ST LUCIE DEVELOPMENT CORP
1999-08-19
35.88
0268093
SANTANA, VICKY LEE
1999-08-19
2.15
0268094
ARTISTIC WOOD FLOORS
1999-08-19
21.24
0268095
MOONEY JR, JAMES F
1999-08-19
70.62
0268096
FULMER JR, Z GLENN
1999-08-19
35.36
0268097
SHAFER, STUART & HELEN
1999-08-19
9.33
0268098
ARNOLD, JEFF & TINA
1999-08-19
51.51
0268099
CAMPBELL, HOPE N
1999-08-19
34.22
0268100
MATTHEWS, BARBARA & JOHN
1999-08-19
51.69
0268101
SNYDER, ALBERT
1999-08-19
29.62
0268102
HALE, CHRISTINE
1999-08-19
42.36
0268103
STRATE, DIANE
1999-08-19
4.73
0268104
BECKINGHAM JR, RICHARD E
1999-08-19
84.82
0268105
FOSTER MANAGEMENT
1999-08-19
60.34
0268106
MORAN, DIAN GRAHN
1999-08-19
42.71
0268107
HOUGH, SONYA
1999-08-19
27.27
0268108
GOTHMAN, SALLY
1999-08-19
11.04
0268109
MEYER, WILLIAM R
1999-08-19
62.64
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
0
•
FOLK o Pgr'.
BOOK FgF 2:7i
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0268110
SELLERS, GLENN E
1999-08-19
80.49
0268111
BLACKWELL, DEBRA
1999-08-19
59.23
0268112
WISE, MICHAEL
1999-08-19
20.40
0268113
ELIAS, ANGEL
1999-08-19
25.11
0268114
CLINTON, SHARON L
1999-08-19
19.15
0268115
COMRAS, MANNY
1999-08-19
48.25
0268116
MALINOS, JOHN
1999-08-19
29.94
0268117
BOSNYAK, STEVE
1999-08-19
- 22.17
0268118
HATCH, MICHAEL JAMES
1999-08-19
8.92
0268119
WISGERHOF, DAVID
1999-08-19
51.15
0268120
CRUZ, ALBERTO
1999-08-19
31.45
0268121
SABALA, JULIANN M
1999-08-19
10.39
0268122'
HORTON, KRISTIN
1999-08-19
50.83
0268123
STURGIS, LARRY A
1999-08-19
37.92
0268124
NEVAREZ, JOSE ALBERTO
1999-08-19
22.68
0268125
HOLBROOK, CHRISTINE A
1999-08-19
19.15
0268126
BENEDICT, JAMES S
1999-08-19
68.40
0268127
SEDILLO, LEORA
1999-08-19
87.70
0268128
LANGDON CONSTRUCTION
1999-08-19
3.54
0268129
PENNINGTON, ALAN F
1999-08-19
69.82
0268130
SANTANA, LUIS M
1999-08-19
20.52
0268131
DOTSON, MARSHA
1999-08-19
37.14
0268132
STRICKLAND, REEDY
1999-08-19
50.47
0268133
GRIDLEY, TIMOTHY
1999-08-19
9.37
0268134
PRYOR, JENNIFER
1999-08-19
25.89
0268135
FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR LTD
1999-08-19
72.31
0268136
GUEST, TIM
1999-08-19
1.54
0268137
BRANNAN, LINDA MC LAIN
1999-08-19
39.31
0268138
BUMPOUS, DONALD KALEB
1999-08-19
20.37
0268139
EDISON STORES #170 AFTER BKRPT
1999-08-19
40.28
0268140
DEL VECCHIO, LARRY & TERI
1999-08-19
27.98
0268141
LOUDON, ANGIE S
1999-08-19
34.43
0268142
AZTEC INSURANCE CO
1999-08-19
41.38
0268143
JACKSON, MICHAEL & THERESA
1999-08-19
118.00
1,448,997.72
7. C. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1999:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: AUGUST 26,1999
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
10
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for
the time period of August 23 to August 26, 1999.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved (4-0, Commissioner Gunn
absent) the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for
the period August 23-26, 1999, as requested.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0020141
WADSWORTH, DENNIS
1999-08-23
205.25
0020142
LETLOW, WILLIE LEE
1999-08-24
200.00
0020143
TEAMSTERS LOCAL ONION NO 769
1999-08-25
3,925.19
0268144
ALBERTSONS SOOTHCO #4357
1999-08-26
240.97
0268145
ALCALDE, RENATO MD
1999-08-26
400.00
0268146
AMERICAN BUSINESS INTERIORS
1999-08-26
263.89
0268147
AUDIOHOUSE
1999-08-26
88.00
0268148
ABS PUMPS, INC
1999-08-26
185.01
0268149
ACTION DIESEL INJECTION
1999-08-26
325.00
0268150
ALL POWER SERVICES, INC
1999-08-26
175.00
0268151
ADDISON OIL CO
1999-08-26
638.65
0268152
ALLIED ELECTRONICS, INC
1999-08-26
135.56
0268153
A T & T
1999-08-26
80.71
0268154
A-1 METAL SUPPLY CORP
1999-08-26
85.36
0268155
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
1999-08-26
57.00
0268156
ALBERTSON'S
1999-08-26
251.02
0268157
A E ROBERTS COMPANY
1999-08-26
396.00
0268158
ANTHONY BAIL BONDS
1999-08-26
7,997.00
0268159
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
1999-08-26
3,532.15
0268160
ARBITELLE, CAROL
1999-08-26
380.30
0268161
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND
1999-08-26
95,675.17
0268162
ARCADIA PUBLISHING
1999-08-26
15.19
0268163
ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
1999-08-26
682.88
0268164
AMERITREND HOMES
1999-08-26
1,000.00
0268165
ASSOCIATES, THE
1999-08-26
7,310.16
0268166
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
1999-08-26
3,031.00
0268167
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1999-08-26
3,515.98
0268168
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
1999-08-26
18.50
0268169
BREATHING AIR SYSTEMS DIVISION
1999-08-26
369.50
0268170
BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD
1999-08-26
1,420.00
0268171
BARTON,, JEFFREY R- CLERK
1999-08-26
193,590.30
0268172
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
1999-08-26
256.73
0268173
BRODART CO
1999-08-26
1,578.04
0268174
BRUHN, JOHN D ESQ
1999-08-26
1,423.95
0268175
BOYETTE, JAMES E
1999-08-26
20.00
0268176
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
1999-08-26
152.24
0268177
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
1999-08-26
16.80
0268178
BELLSOUTH
1999-08-26
6,594.71
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
11
BOOK
r
0
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
0268179
BEAZER HOMES, INC
1999-08-26
0268180
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
1999-08-26
0268181
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
1999-08-26
0268182
BMG
1999-08-26
0268183
BOYES & FARINA P A
1999-08-26
0268184
BREVARD ASSOCIATED COURT
1999-08-26
0268185
BACK, ELIZABETH
1999-08-26
0268186
BITTAR, EDWARD F MD
1999-08-26
0268187
BELLSOUTH
1999-08-26
0268188
CATAPHOTE INC
1999-08-26
0268189
ANDREW CHOQUETTE
1999-08-26
0268190
CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC
1999-08-26
0268191
CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
1999-08-26
0268192
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
1999-08-26
0268193
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
1999-08-26
0268194
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
1999-08-26
0268195
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
1999-08-26
0268196
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
1999-08-26
0268197
COPELAND, LINDA
1999-08-26
0268198
COGAR, ROBERT
1999-08-26
0268199
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
1999-08-26
0268200
CUES, INC
1999-08-26
0268201
CROSSROADS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1999-08-26
0268202
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
1999-08-26
0268203
CAMPBELL, STEPHANIE
1999-08-26
0268204
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
1999-08-26
0268205
COLUMBIA HOUSE
1999-08-26
0268206
CLE INTERNATIONAL
1999-08-26
0268207
CRIPPEN & LANDRU, PUBLISHERS
1999-08-26
0268208
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
1999-08-26
0268209
COMPLETE MARINE SERVICES
1999-08-26
0268210
CHEMICAL SERVICES CO
1999-08-26
0268211
COMMERCIAL TITLE SERVICE,INC
1999-08-26
0268212
DELTA SUPPLY CO
1999-08-26
0268213
DEMCO INC
1999-08-26
0268214
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
1999-08-26
0268215
DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS
1999-08-26
0268216
DELL, PAUL MD
1999-08-26
0268217
DADE PAPER COMPANY
1999-08-26
0268218
DESIGNED TRAFFIC
1999-08-26
0268219
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
1999-08-26
0268220
DEMONS, JUSTINE
1999-08-26
0268221
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
1999-08-26
0268222
ELLIS K PHELPS AND CO, INC
1999-08-26
0268223
ELPEX, INC
1999-08-26
0268224
ED MORSE CHEVROLET INC
1999-08-26
0268225
ELBERS, H J
1999-08-26
0268226
FAHRO OFFICES
1999-08-26
0268227
FEDEX
1999-08-26
0268228
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
1999-08-26
0268229
FLORIDA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
1999-08-26
0268230
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
1999-08-26
0268231
FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL
1999-08-26
0268232
FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK
1999-08-26
0268233
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
1999-08-26
0268234
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
1999-08-26
0268235
FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
1999-08-26
0268236
FLINN, SHEILA I
1999-08-26
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
12
e,00K . I f -i rmu'E 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,000.00
11,208.60
356.31
77.57
13,003.57
71.20
5.26
200.00
1,730.10
1,940.00
476.00
165.00
157.30
19.00
12,354.63
451.50
4,096.00
13,617.94
329.00
39.44
37.69
168.74
151.00
58.50
280.68
253.50
58.58
595.00
16.00
2,426.41
148.14
6,000.00
19.59
9.52
21.82
224.73
9.81
200.00
315.27
10,864.20
38.70
350.00
36.00
2,873.87
1,817.71
27,247.06
11.36
181.15
23.25
163.73
2,889.25
34,994.36
60.00
100.00
26.45
1,651.80
1,437.00
136.50
40
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0268237
FATHER & SON CARPET CLEANING
1999-08-26
12,660.00
0268238
FACTS ON FILE INC
1999-08-26
86.67
0268239
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
1999-08-26
1,350.18
0268240
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE
1999-08-26
1,135.65
0268241
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
1999-08-26
10.74
0268242
GENE'S AUTO GLASS
1999-08-26
115.00
0268243
GLACE & RADCLIFFE, INC
1999-08-26
2,753.80
0268244
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
1999-08-26
724.59
0268245
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
1999-08-26
227.79
0268246
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
1999-08-26
120.00
0268247
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
1999-08-26
59.00
0268248
GRIBBLE, J M
1999-08-26
2,500.00
0268249
GREENE, ROBERT E
1999-08-26
1,856.77
0268250
GOLFNET, INC
1999-08-26
111.00
0268251
GMR
1999-08-26
27.50
0268252
GE CAPITAL IT SOLUTIONS
1999-08-26
458.08
0268253
GOLD, SCOTT L MD
1999-08-26
350.00
0268254
GARCIA, ARTURO L
1999-08-26
500.00
0268255
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1999-08-26
278.20
0268256
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
1999-08-26
22.44
0268257
HACH COMPANY
1999-08-26
62.40
0268258
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
1999-08-26
49,016.98
0268259
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
1999-08-26
228.00
0268260
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1999-08-26
500.00
0268261
HYATT REGENCY WESTSHORE HOTEL
1999-08-26
172.00
0268262
HOWARD JOHNSON EXPRESS INN
1999-08-26
162.00
0268263
HOLLOMAN III, WILLIE JAMES
1999-08-26
108.15
0268264
HUBBARD, KATHY
1999-08-26
177.50
0268265
HOME DEPOT
1999-08-26
62.78
0268266
HARTLINE, CRAIG
1999-08-26
735.08
0268267
HALE, ROBERT & JEANNETTE
1999-08-26
288.13
0268268
HUDMON, GARY & MABEL
1999-08-26
12.35
0268269
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-08-26
112.00
0268270
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
1999-08-26
6,063.04
0268271
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1999-08-26
202.00
0268272
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
1999-08-26
173.45
0268273
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
1999-08-26
348.57
0268274
ISIS PUBLISHING
1999-08-26
13.50
0268275
INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT
1999-08-26
50.00
0268276
INTER -TEL TECHNOLOGIES INC
1999-08-26
11,610.00
0268277
IBM CORPORATION
1999-08-26
46.00
0268278
INTERNATIONAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
1999-08-26
72,125.00
0268279
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
1999-08-26
104,026.10
0268280
IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
1999-08-26
132.00
0268281
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
1999-08-26
100.00
0268282
INTERACTIVE FITNESS TRAINERS
1999-08-26
99.00
0268283
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
1999-08-26
43.00
0268284
JEFFERSON. CHRISTOPHER A
1999-08-26
120.00
0268285
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
1999-08-26
51.95
0268286
KRUGER CONSTRUCTION CORP
1999-08-26
60.00
0268287
KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT
1999-08-26
711.59
0268288
KOERNER, DENNIS
1999-08-26
25.00
0268289
KLOTZER, ROBERT
1999-08-26
59.01
0268290
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
1999-08-26
53.02
0268291
KIPP, BILLY C
1999-08-26
360.50
0268292
KERKELA, LEIF
1999-08-26
435.00
0268293
LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
1999-08-26
5,100.00
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
13
•
mur. L _ j Pay -6r
I
8 o 0 K
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0268294
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
1999-08-26
70.00
0268295
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC
1999-08-26
1,302.10
0268296
L B SMITH, INC
1999-08-26
296.77
0268297
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
1999-08-26
94.97
0268298
LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE
1999-08-26
26.69
0268299
LARGE PRINT LIBRARY DISCOUNTER
1999-08-26
84.53
0268300
LONE CABBAGE TRADING CO, INC
1999-08-26
500.00
0268301
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
1999-08-26
1,185.29
0268302
MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
1999-08-26
15.00
0268303
INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
1999-08-26
14,505.91
0268304
MICKLER'S FLORIDIANA, INC
1999-08-26
108.39
0268305
MUNICIPAL SUPPLY &
1999-08-26
1,493.10
0268306
MAGANA, IGNACIO M D
1999-08-26
51.00
0268307
MORGAN AND EKLUND
1999-08-26
4,395.25
0268308
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
1999-08-26
23.01
0268309
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
1999-08-26
89.96
0268310
MORRILL, TINA AND CITY OF
1999-08-26
31.00
- 0268311
MICKLE, VALERIE
1999-08-26
64.52
0268312
MEDCHECK
1999-08-26
454.88
0268313
MELCHIORI, NICK
1999-08-26
70.00
0268314
MELANIE GROUT REPORTING, INC
1999-08-26
250.00
0268315
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
1999-08-26
1,000.00
0268316
MAS, OGLA
1999-08-26
25.00
0268317
MCKESSON GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
1999-08-26
447.60
0268318
MURPHY, DEBBIE
1999-08-26
180.00
0268319
MERCER, PHILIP W., MD
1999-08-26
200.00
0268320
MOUNT DORA LAWN BOWLING CLUB
1999-08-26
551.50
0268321
MURDOCK, GARY
1999-08-26
30.00
0268322
NOLTE, DAVID C
1999-08-26
179,680.78
0268323
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
1999-08-26
250.05
0268324
NICOSIA, ROGER J DO
1999-08-26
1,500.00
0268325
NAN MCKAY & ASSOCIATES, INC
1999-08-26
8.15
0268326
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
1999-08-26
2,550.00
0268327
NEWMAN'S POWER SYSTEMS
1999-08-26
265.69
0268328
NATIONAL PROPANE CORP
1999-08-26
265.72
0268329
NOCUTS, INC
1999-08-26
78.80
0268330
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
1999-08-26
835.42
0268331
ON IT'S WAY
1999-08-26
492.00
0268332
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
1999-08-26
1,356.70
0268333
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
1999-08-26
185.40
0268334
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
1999-08-26
8,763.30
0268335
PERKINS DRUG, INC
1999-08-26
138.15
0268336
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
1999-08-26
224.59
0268337
PETTY CASH
1999-08-26
22.40
0268338
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
1999-08-26
1,000.00
0268339
PETRILLA, FRED J, PED
1999-08-26
900.00
0268340
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
1999-08-26
436.33
0268341
PRESS JOURNAL
1999-08-26
532.50
0268342
PRECISION CONTRACTING
1999-08-26
2,478.58
0268343
PINEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
1999-08-26
30.00
0268344
P C CONNECTION, INC
1999-08-26
3,747.78
0268345
PANGBURN, TERRI
1999-08-26
12.00
0268346
PRESS JOURNAWSTUART NEWS
1999-08-26
1,230.24
0268347
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
1999-08-26
53.63
0268348
PIPPIN PROPERTIES, INC
1999-08-26
200.00
0268349
PAYNE, JAMES
1999-08-26
90.00
0268350
PROSPER, JANET C
1999-08-26
147.00
0268351
PRESSURE PRO
1999-08-26
109.05
0268352
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
1999-08-26
27.80
0268353
QUALITY COPY ACQUISITION CORP
1999-08-26
261.40
0268354
RADIOSEACK
1999-08-26
89.99
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
14
CHECK
NAME
- CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0268355
RIFKIN, SHELDON H PBD
1999-08-26
200.00
0268356
RINGHAVER
1999-08-26
1,041.99
0268357
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
1999-08-26
1,200.00
0268358
RAY PACE'S WASTE EQUIPMENT,INC
1999-08-26
147.96
0268359
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
1999-08-26
47,109.65
0268360
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
1999-08-26
12.00
0268361
RESOURCE MEDIA GROUP INC
1999-08-26
191.95
0268362
REBEL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC
1999-08-26
170.40
0268363
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
1999-08-26
10,641.59
0268364
R C BEACH & ASSOCIATES INC
1999-08-26
3,270.00
0268365
SCOTTY'S, INC
1999-08-26
145.98
0268366
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
1999-08-26
150.00
0268367
SECURITY TITLE OF INDIAN
1999-08-26
11.28
0268368
SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE
1999-08-26
350.00
0268369
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
1999-08-26
549.63
0268370
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
1999-08-26
455.95
0268371
STIMSONITE CORPORATION
1999-08-26
9,216.00
0268372
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
1999-08-26
261.53
0268373
SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO
1999-08-26
171.39
0268374
ST LUCIE PAPER & PACKAGING,INC
1999-08-26
944.59
0268375
SIMON & SCHUSTER
1999-08-26
49.38
0268376
SIGNS IN A DAY
1999-08-26
65.00
0268377
SKILLPATH SEMINARS
1999-08-26
149.00
0268378
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
1999-08-26
592.83
0268379
SEXTON, HILDY
1999-08-26
80.00
0268380
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
1999-08-26
275.48
0268381
SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC
1999-08-26
277.77
0268382
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
1999-08-26
161.64
0268383
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
1999-08-26
1,350.00
0268384
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
1999-08-26
68.00
0268385
STIDHAM, DONNIE
1999-08-26
400.00
0268386
SFC TRAVEL PUBLICATIONS
1999-08-26
103.95
0268387
SECURITYLINK FROM AMERITECH
1999-08-26
350.00
0268388
T-SHIRT FACTORY
1999-08-26
125.70
0268389
TREASURE COAST TRAVEL AGENCY,
1999-08-26
260.00
0268390
TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC
1999-08-26
6,840.00
0268391
TRUGREEN CBEMLAWN
1999-08-26
630.00
0268392
TARGET STORE T-1050
1999-08-26
90.00
0268393
TRADEWINDS
1999-08-26
2,375.00
0268394
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
1999-08-26
140.18
0268395
TRAFFIC MONITORING
1999-08-26
405.00
0268396
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
1999-08-26
54.00
0268397
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
1999-08-26
95.96
0268398
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
1999-08-26
1,436.18
0268399
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
1999-08-26
44.95
0268400
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
1999-08-26
2,106.00
0268401
U.S COURT OF APPEALS
1999-08-26
10.00
0268402
VELDE FORD, INC
1999-08-26
6,280.61
0268403
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-08-26
16,620.50
0268404
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-08-26
9,175.00
0268405
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
1999-08-26
497.00
0268406
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
1999-08-26
212.98
0268407
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
1999-08-26
1,649.11
0268408
VERO ORTHOPAEDICS
1999-08-26
1,400.00
0268409
VERO BEARING & BOLT
1999-08-26
350.82
0268410
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
1999-08-26
142.74
0268411
VOLUNTEER ACTION COMMITTEE
1999-08-26
25.00
0268412
VAN'S RADIATOR SALES & SERVICE
1999-08-26
999.00
0268413
VERO CLEAN INC
1999-08-26
201.64
0268414
WAL-MART STORES, INC
1999-08-26
58.60
0268415
WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608
1999-08-26
460.15
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
15
I BOOK ijo r ,
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NEER
DATE
AMOUNT
0268416
WOODY'S PAPER & PRINT
1999-08-26
44.13
0268417
WINN DIXIE
1999-08-26
462.05
0268418
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
1999-08-26
83.63
0268419
WILLHOFF, PATSY
1999-08-26
130.00
0268420
WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION
1999-08-26
560.00
0268421
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
1999-08-26
52,844.00
0268422
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642
1999-08-26
15.59
0268423
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
1999-08-26 -
754.50
0268424
WELLS, CARLOS L, ESQ
1999-08-26
12.76
0268425
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
1999-08-26
236.93
0268426
WALGREENS PHARMACY
1999-08-26
90.17
0268427
XEROX CORPORATION
1999-08-26
235.17
0268428
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
1999-08-26
148.06
0268429
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
1999-08-26
21.60
0268430
ZEP CONSTRUCTION INC
1999-08-26
258,552.00
0268431
BLOOMINGBURG, OTTO H
1999-08-26
296.20
0268432
MILLER, JOSEPH AND LLOYD,
1999-08-26
321.94
0268433
VALENTINI, PATRICK
1999-08-26
630.36
0268434
DELUCA, EUGINE A
1999-08-26
28.91
0268435
ANDO BUILDING CORPORATION
1999-08-26
59.77
0268436
GHO VERO BEACH INC
1999-08-26
158.78
0268437
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
1999-08-26
104.83
0268438
SARMIENTO, MARY & JOEL
1999-08-26
8.63
0268439
G J G INC
1999-08-26
42.72
0268440
SANDHOLM, HARLAN
1999-08-26
54.87
0268441
MANHARDT, JAMES H & LAURIE
1999-08-26
50.22
0268442
NEIRA, INES
1999-08-26
67.39
0268443
O'DONNELL, ROBERT E
1999-08-26
23.27
0268444
MITTS JR, CHARLES F
1999-08-26
45.36
0268445
LUNSFORD, DAVID
1999-08-26
24.51
0268446
GOLDEN, THOMAS
1999-08-26
47.96
0268447
REXFORD BUILDERS
1999-08-26
95.07
0268448
HOGAN, JAMES D
1999-08-26
40.51
0268449
HELSETH, ANNA
1999-08-26
20.00
0268450
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
1999-08-26
24.64
0268451
DAVIS, RABBI JAYR OR IRNA
1999-08-26
10.60
0268452
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
1999-08-26
128.72
0268453
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1999-08-26
50.21
0268454
SCHOCK, DONNA
1999-08-26
22.32
0268455
WALKER, LISA
1999-08-26
49.00
0268456
WETHERINGTON, WILSON L
1999-08-26
65.57
0268457
BUTTON, JOHN E
1999-08-26
59.72
0268458
OATES, ALAN R
1999-08-26
87.57
0268459
AHEARN, ALBERT J
1999-08-26
38.34
0268460
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
1999-08-26
41.59
0268461
DOONER, MARY K
1999-08-26
64.94
0268462
OSTERMAN, DENNIS & MICHELE
1999-08-26
22.23
0268463
FULLER, WARREN
1999-08-26
35.15
0268464
HARBOR BRANCH OCEANOGRAPHIC
1999-08-26
51.33
0268465
WADDILL, BILL
1999-08-26
7.81
0268466
MORALES, EDILBERTO
1999-08-26
64.38
0268467
CIRCLE N RANCH INC
1999-08-26
38.40
0268468
RATCLIFF, PHILLIP J
1999-08-26
41.23
0268469
DALTON, GEOFFREY C
1999-08-26
56.95
0268470
BLUE, LINDA
1999-08-26
32.29
0268471
COSTA, LORI A
1999-08-26
27.19
0268472
TREASURE COAST BUILDERS INC
1999-08-26
80.44
0268473
POOLE, TONY
1999-08-26
46.80
0268474
DUNCAN, ARCELONA
1999-08-26
9.29
0268475
WILSON, TERRIE
1999-08-26
53.29
0268476
FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR LTD
1999-08-26
146.68
0268477
WEST, RYAN
1999-08-26
44.73
SEPTEMBER
7, 1999
Mi
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0268478
BROOKS, HAROLD L
1999-08-26
59.80
0268479
VASSALLO, FRANK
1999-08-26
104.80
0268480
FUSS, WILLIAM
1999-08-26
52.62
0268481
MULDER, KAREN
1999-08-26
90.24
0268482
RCL DEVELOPMENT
1999-08-26
41.32
0268483
BRUCE SMITH CUSTOM HOMES
1999-08-26
50.89
0268484
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
1999-08-26
61.48
0268485
DELVECCHIO, LARRY
1999-08-26
9.92
0268486
HICKS, MARK
1999-08-26
22.00
0268487
TOWNSEND, MICHAEL
1999-08-26
15.03
0268488
ERVIN, CAROLINE R
1999-08-26
.6.91
0268489
WILLIAMS, FREELAND
1999-08-26
16.05
0268490
ANDERSON, FRED
1999-08-26
148.00
0268491
BROXTON, LYDIA
1999-08-26
223.00
0268492
BREVCO PROPERTIES, INC
1999-08-26
471.00
0268493
BEUTTELL, PETER M
1999-08-26
270.00
0268494
SILKEN GROUP
1999-08-26
1,412.00
0268495
BEANS, ROBERT
1999-08-26
163.00
0268496
BROOKS, DONNA AND CITY OF VERO
1999-08-26
59.00
0268497
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
1999-08-26
1,158.00
0268498
BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
1999-08-26
397.00
0268499
BLAHNIK, CHRIS OR MILDRED
1999-08-26
224.00
0268500
BUCKNER, SHEILA & CITY OF VERO
1999-08-26
84.00
0268501
BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF
1999-08-26
285.64
0268502
BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY
1999-08-26
484.64
0268503
BLUE, YOLANDA
1999-08-26
477.00
0268504
CARTWRIGHT, WILLIAM AND/
1999-08-26
197.00
0268505
CORR, RHODA L
1999-08-26
299.00
0268506
COLLINS, THOMAS H
1999-08-26
850.00
0268507
COSCO, KEN
1999-08-26
387.00
0268508
CENTURY 21 SEATREK REALTY, INC
1999-08-26
245.00
0268509
CARLTON, ALLAN R
1999-08-26
306.00
0268510
C P E ASSOCIATES
1999-08-26
908.00
0268511
CAPAK, GERALD T
1999-08-26
348.00
0268512
CUMMINGS, JERRY
1999-08-26
424.00
0268513
CLUNN, JEFFREY
1999-08-26
341.00
0268514
CARONE, PAUL
1999-08-26
230.00
0268515
CHAMBLISS, CHIQUITA AND CITY
1999-08-26
18.00
0268516
CARTER, SANDRA & CITY OF VERO
1999-08-26
58.00
0268517
CARLUCCI, LEONARD A
1999-08-26
404.00
0268518
DAN PREUSS REALTY, INC
1999-08-26
274.00
0268519
DOOLITTLE JAMES A & ASSOCIATES
1999-08-26
3,257.00
0268520
DENNISON, WANDA
1999-08-26
911.00
0268521
DOVE, E WILSON
1999-08-26
253.00
0268522
DOYLE, CHERYL
1999-08-26
305.00
0268523
EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
1999-08-26
490.00
0268524
EDWARD, FRANKLIN
1999-08-26
327.00
0268525
FOGERTY, GEORGE A
1999-08-26
315.00
0268526
FRESH, DANIEL J
1999-08-26
228.00
0268527
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
1999-08-26
1,867.92
0268528
FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC
1999-08-26
97.00
0268529
FORD, ROBERT J
1999-08-26
287.00
0268530
GASKILL, ROBERT
1999-08-26
251.00
0268531
GRIMM, FLOYD OR HELEN
1999-08-26
190.00
0268532
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
1999-08-26
11,225.00
0268533
GRACEFS LANDING LTD
1999-08-26
3,100.00
0268534
GLOVERSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY
1999-08-26
249.64
0268535
HOLM, LEO
1999-08-26
445.00
0268536
HAMM, BEVERLY AND CITY OF VERO
1999-08-26
89.00
0268537
IMBRIANI, VINCENT
1999-08-26
451.00
0268538
JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES
1999-08-26
5,432.00
0268539
JAHOLKOWSKI, PAUL
1999-08-26
278.00
0268540
JENNINGS, LESSIE
1999-08-26
261.00
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
17
•
SOCK ^ FrgGr. �..��
r- BOOK 110 F'AGE 426"
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NU1"3ME
DATE
AMOUNT
0268541
JAHOLKOWSKI, MIKE
1999-08-26
245.00
0268542
JULIN, PAUL
1999-08-26
185.00
0268543
JOHNSTON, PATTIE
1999-08-26
391.00
0268544
JONES, ALPHONSO
1999-08-26
255.00
0268545
KOLB, GREGORY L
1999-08-26
443.00
0268546
KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA
1999-08-26
526.00
0268547
KISSIMMEE, CITY OF
1999-08-26
440.64
0268548
LAWRENCE, TERRY A
1999-08-26
191.00
0268549
LLERENA, E D
1999-08-26
472.00
0268550
LANGLEY, PHILIP G
1999-08-26
239.00
0268551
LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
1999-08-26
6,428.00
0268552
MIBELL, LLONALD AND/OR
1999-08-26
361.00
0268553
M O D INVESTMENTS
1999-08-26
1,037.00
0268554
MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
1999-08-26
201.00
0268555
MANN, ROBERT OR WANDA ARMA
.1999-08-26
203.00
0268556
MALGERIA, PRISCILLA
1999-08-26
423.00
0268557
MORRILL, TINA AND CITY OF
1999-08-26
31.00
0268558
MCINTOSH, SYLVESTER B JR
1999-08-26
426.00
0268559
MULLINS, B FRANK
1999-08-26
501.00
0268560
MC CLAY, ROBIN
1999-08-26
312.00
0268561
MCGRIFF, SHARON AND CITY OF
1999-08-26
47.00
0268562
MCNEAL, JAMES
1999-08-26
177.00
0268563
MIAMI BEACH, CITY OF
1999-08-26
390.64
0268564
NEUHAUSER, ERNEST
1999-08-26
272.00
0268565
ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND
1999-08-26
600.64
0268566
O'NEAL, LESLIE & CITY OF VERO
1999-08-26
43.00
0268567
PALMER TRAILER PARR
1999-08-26
517.00
• 0268568
POLLY, EMMA
1999-08-26
1,217.00
0268569
PIERSON, JOHN H DBA
1999-08-26
322.00
0268570
PALUMBO, LOUIS
1999-08-26
356.00
0268571
PRYOR, ELIGHA
1999-08-26
400.00
0268572
REAGAN, WILLIE C
1999-08-26
611.00
0268573
RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST
1999-08-26
155.00
0268574
REALTY CONNECTIONS OF VERO,INC
1999-08-26
386.00
0268575
REARDANZ, MARVIN
1999-08-26
499.00
0268576
RICHARDS, WILLIAM A
1999-08-26
442.00
0268577
RODRIGUEZ, BLANCA
1999-08-26
337.00
0268578
RICOTTI, RICARDO
1999-08-26
480.00
0268579
RIVER PARK PLACE
1999-08-26
1,981.00
0268580
ST FRANCIS MANOR
1999-08-26
2,494.00
0268581
SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
1999-08-26
322.00
0268582
SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR
1999-08-26
249.00
0268583
SABONJOHN, FLORENCE
1999-08-26
268.00
0268584
SANFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY
1999-08-26
360.64
0268585
SANDY PINES
1999-08-26
4,298.00
0268586
SHELTON, ROBERT L
1999-08-26
424.00
0268587
STARCK, MICHAEL R
1999-08-26
345.00
0268588
STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR
1999-08-26
212.00
0268589
SUNDMAN, IVAN
1999-08-26
299.00
0268590
SPARKS, DAVID
1999-08-26
113.00
0268591
STIMELING, PAUL B OR MARGARET
1999-08-26
161.00
0268592
SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA
1999-08-26
65.00
0268593
TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING
1999-08-26
414.00
0268594
TOLBERT, JEANETTE AND CITY OF
1999-08-26
34.00
0268595
VERO MOBILE HOME PARK
1999-08-26
490.00
0268596
VERO FIRST CORPORATION
1999-08-26
2,578.00
0268597
BLARE, SALLIE (WYNN)
1999-08-26
284.00
0268598
WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M
1999-08-26
496.00
0268599
WILLIAMS, DEBRA WASHINGTON
1999-08-26
121.00
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
18
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0268600 WILLIAMS, EDITH
0268601 YORK, LILLY B
0268602 YORK, DAVID
0268603 ZANCA, LEONARD
CHECK
DATE
1999-08-26
1999-08-26
1999-08-26
1999-08-26
CHECK
AMOUNT
329.00
193.00
379.00
1,127.00
1,539,081.25
•
7.D. Proclamation DgF nngdng September 17-23. 1999 as
Constitution Week in Indian River County
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved the following
proclamation.
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING SEPTEMBER 17-23,1999
AS CONSTITUTION WEEK
IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings ofliberty for themselves
and thew posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United State of America; and
WHEREAS, it is of the greatest import that all citizens Uly understand the Constitution
provides a historic opportunity for all Americans to learn about and recall achievements of our
FamdeM and to reflect on the rights and privileges of citizenship, as well as its attendant
responsibilities; and
WHEREAS. the two hundred twelfth emniversaryofthe sigmngoftheConstitution provides
a historic opportunity for all Americans to learn about and recall achievements of our Founders, and
to reflect on the rights and privileges of citizenship, as well as its attendant responsibilities; and
WHEREAS. the indepe denceguan n cedtotheAmericanpeoplebytheConstitutionshould
be celebrated by appropriate caenonfe and activities during Constitution Weep and
WHEREAS. the Baud ofCowuy Commissioners ofladim River Cowry strives to uphold
the Constitution of the United States of America;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAEJ IED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS that the week of September 17 through September
23, 1999 be designated as
CONSTITUTION WEEK
in Indian River County, and the Board urges all citizens to pay special attention during that week
to our Federal Constitution and the advantage of American Citizenship.
Adopted this r day of Septernber, 1999.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
nneth R. Macht. Chairman
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
19
HEIK
Fr-
BOOK I 10 Fr -UF 2-�U-
ZE. Resolution No. 99-088 - Release of Easement for 5' Portion oJ
the Rear Lot Drainage and Utility Easement - Forest Park
Subdivision, Unit No. 1, Lot 8 (Robert L. Gaskill)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 24, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
0;mo ert M. Keating, AICD
Community Development' e
THROUGH: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
& Code Enforcement
FROM: Charles W. Heath, CCEIC1101 I
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE: August 24, 1999
SUBJECT: Release of Easement Request for a five (5) foot portion of the rear lot drainage and
utility easement, Lot 8, Forest Park Subdivision, Unit No. 1.
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 07, 1999.
The County has been petitioned by Robert L. Gaskill, owner of a lot at 28 Forest Park Drive , for release
of a five (5) foot portion of the rear lot fifteen (15) foot drainage and utility easement.
The purpose of the easement release request is for construction of a swimming pool and associated
structures that would otherwise encroach into said easement (see attached maps).
The requests have been reviewed by Bell South Communications; Florida Power & Light Corporation;
T.C.I. Cable Corporation; the Indian River County Utilities Department; the County Road & Bridge and
Engineering Divisions; and the County surveyor. None of the utility providers or reviewing agencies
expressed an objection to the requested partial release of easements. Therefore, it is staffs position that
the requested easement release would have no adverse impact to utilities being supplied to the subject
properties or to other properties.
Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the attached resolution, release a five (5) foot
wide portion of the rear lot fifteen (15) foot drainage and utility easement, as more particularly described
in said resolution.
1. Proposed County Resolution Abandoning Easement
2. Application and map depicting easement (portion thereof) proposed for release
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
20
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) adopted Resolution No. 99-088
abandoning a five (5) foot portion of the rear lot fifteen (15) foot
drainage and utility easement of Lot 8, Forest Park Subdivision,
Unit No. 1, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Book 9, Page 50, of the Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida. (Gaskill)
RESOLUTION NO. 9 9 - 8 8
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ABANDONING
A FIVE (5) FOOT PORTION OF THE REAR LOT FIFTEEN (15) FOOT DRAINAGE
AND UTILITY EASEMENT OF LOT 8, FOREST PARK SUBDIVLSION, UNIT NO. 1,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 50
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, Indian River County has an easement as described below; and
WHEREAS, the retention of the easement serves no public purpose;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida that:
This release of easement is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, whose mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, Grantor,
to Robert L. Gaskill, successors in interest, heirs and assigns, whose mailing address is 28 Forest Park
Drive, Vero Beach, Florida, 32962, as follows:
Indian River County does hereby abandon all right, title, and interest that it may have in the
following described easement:
a five (5) foot portion of the rear lot fifteen (15) foot drainage and utility easement of Lot
8, Forest Park Subdivision, Unit No. 1, more particularly described as being the
southerly five (5) feet of the northerly fifteen (15) feet, less and except the westerly ten
(10) feet of said easement, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page
50 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams ,
seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d a e , and adopted on the 7th day of September 1999, by
the following vote:
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht A y e
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Ty e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Absent
Commissioner John W. Tippin Ay e
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Ay e
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 7th day of September, 1999.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN O ORIDA
By y!!i2i
eth R. Macht
Chan--=
Atteste . Bv: 12�
Deputy Clerk
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
21
0
BOOK FAGr�_°'
RESOLUTION NO. 9 9 - 8 8
gi�ielfl �,. Janle.5
The foregoing instrument was acknow dged before me this 7 t h day of S e p t e m b e r,
1999, by KENNETH K MACHT as Chai of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, and by , Deputy Clerk for JEFFREY K. BARTON, Clerk of
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who are personally -known to me.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
Teirence P. O'Brien
Assistant County Attorney
NOOT��ARY�� P
PUBLIC
� V
Printed Name! K i m b e r l
Commission No.:
Commission Expiration:_
"K6nberi E Mauun9
MY COMMISSION t Ca5R36 DtPIRES
]uly 15, 2003
x� �o�ne�uTcorFaNua+e
7.F. Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Annual
Evaluation Report for 1998-99 Apj2roved
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DI ON HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Developm nt rector
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP J -/Z -
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: AUGUST 26, 1999
RE: REQUEST TO APPROVE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR
(CTC) ANNUAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR 1998-99
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of September 7, 1999.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
22
•
One requirement of the county's coordinated transportation
disadvantaged development plan is that "the Transportation
Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB) shall evaluate the
performance of the Community Transportation Coordinator and provide
a recommendation to the DOPA for continuation or replacement of the
Community Transportation Coordinator". To facilitate this
evaluation process, the TDLCB developed a set of criteria for the
coordinator evaluation. On September 11, 1992, the Board of County
Commissioners, acting as the county's Designated Official Planning
Agency (DOPA), approved the CTC's evaluation procedures and
standards.
To conduct the CTC evaluation, the Transportation Disadvantaged
Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB) established a subcommittee whose
purpose was to meet with the coordinator and evaluate the
coordinator's performance. Using the criteria established by the
TDLCB, as well as evaluation criteria established by the State
Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD), the
subcommittee assessed the performance of the Community
Transportation Coordinator and prepared a report addressing the
coordinator's performance in relation to each of the evaluation
criteria. A copy of that report is attached. Based upon its
assessment, the evaluation sub -committee gave good marks to the
Indian River County Council on Aging as the county's CTC and
recommended that the Council on Aging be retained as the county's
CTC.
At its regular meeting on August
CTC annual evaluation report
subcommittee. The TDLCB also
evaluation report to the Board
review and approval.
26, 1999, the TDLCB approved the
submitted by the evaluation
directed staff to forward the
of County Commissioners/DOPA for
The Indian River County Council on Aging has been the County's
Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) since October 1990. In
each of the past eight years, the Transportation Disadvantaged
Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB) recommended that the BCC/DOPA
retain the Council on Aging as the county's CTC. Subsequently, the
BCC/DOPA approved the TDLCB's recommendation and retained the
Indian River County Council on Aging as the coordinator.
This year, evaluation of the CTC was performed by an evaluation
subcommittee of the Local Coordinating Board. This evaluation was
conducted according to the CTC evaluation procedures and criteria
approved by the TDLCB and the BCC/DOPA and the CTD's evaluation
criteria. The Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating
Board recommended that the BCC/DOPA retain the Council on Aging as
the county's CTC.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
23
'1
EOU� � ��� � FAGIr�,
BOOK .d- F�aGL
The Board of County Commissioners, acting as the Transportation
Disadvantaged Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA), has two
alternatives. The first alternative is to approve the CTC annual
evaluation report and retain the Council on Aging as the county's
CTC. A second alternative would be to reject the CTC annual
evaluation report and direct the TDLCB to re-evaluate the
coordinator.
The TDLCB and staff recommend that BCC/DOPA approve the attached
CTC annual evaluation report, retain the Council on Aging as the
county's CTC, and direct staff to forward the evaluation report to
the State Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged.
1. A copy of the FY 1998-99 CTC evaluation report
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved the CTC annual
evaluation report, retained the Council onAging as the County's
CTC, and directed staff to forward the evaluation report to the
State Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
7. G. Purchase of Hydraulic Excavator from Coastline E-►uiment
Company, Ina - Kobelco Unit Substituted for Samsung Unit
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 1, 1999:
DATE. September 1, 1999
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COhMUSSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director -jt4,0 J•(
FROM Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: Substitution of Mamuacture for purchase of,Hl�ydraulic Excavator
Road and Bridge Division
The Road and Bridge Division recently ordered a Samsung hydraulic excavator off of State
Contract (#760-840-99-1) from Coastline Equipment Company Inc. The purchase price for this
.piece of equipment is $140,539.00.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
24
Coastline Equipment Company Inc. has offered a Kobelco hydraulic excavator as a brand
substitute for the Samsung unit at the same state contract price and warranty conditions. (See
Exhibit A). The Kobelco unit meets all the equipment specifications outlined on state contract.
In addition, Coastline Equipment Company Inc. has confirmed that the Kobelco unit has a 15
day delivery time instead of the 90 day delivery time for the state coSamsung unit.
The Road and Bridge Division has submitted a request to accept the substitution brand for the
Kobelco unit. (See Exhibit B)
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the substitution of the
Kobelco unit for the state contract Samsung unit at the same purchase price of $140,530.00.
ArJW41onod i►niornw,6vi
4or- fe oe W it
we, a fice.,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) authorized the substitution of the
Kobelco unit for the state contract Samsung unit at the same
purchase price of $140,530, from Coastline Equipment
Company, Inc., as recommended in the Memorandum.
Z.H. Equipment Declared Surplus for Sale or Disposal
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 1, 1999:
DATE: September 1, 1999
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY CONWsSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director �c�4
.FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal
BACKGROUND:
The attached list of equipment has been determined to be excess to the needs of the County and
should be disposed in accordance with the provisions of the Florida State Statutes. The list has
been circulated to various departments to determine their needs for any of the excess equipment
or vehicles.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
25
10
0
y >
Escess/Surplus Property Listing
o A.
ray Department Asset 0 Fleet # Description Serial # working Condition a �'
Animal Control � C �' m
14922 610 1993 FordAerostar Van 1FTDA14U7PZB770O6 high miles• O b o�
15040 430 1989 Ford Aerostar Van 1 FTCA34U7KZB93304 high mile p co
W Community Development �+• co
�40 6451 302 1986 Ford Ranger 4x4 truck 1 FTCRI l T60UBS3182 unsafe A
o 0
9281 350 1987 Chevy CIO Truck IGCDR14HS4164124 no a/c co 14 g 0-.-
o CO, , 00
0 "
Emergency Medical Services ,b 0 C
11668 739 1990 Ford E350 Clubwagon 1 FD3311BLHBO22599 high miles (� CD
�o � � o
Fine District
14751 516 1988 Ford Crown Victoria 2FABP7208KX159611 poor
14752 517 1988 Ford Crown Victoria 2FABP7201 JX151696 poor m�• 0
ON Parks Division p n
3424 146 1980 Ford F700 flatbed truck F70HVGH0462 high miles ` , FA
Road & Bridge A.
1640 133 1968 Fleco root rake 29711 yes co
1732 087 1973 Couch 18° portable pump 2B4887 unknown a• p a
3216 132 1979 Ford F700 spray truck F70AVEC9832 unknown 13
3229 Spray box sprayer n/a unknown,
4775 237 1983 Ford F700 flatbed truck IFDWK74NXDVA2BIOS not running►
8911 1987 Cat Hyd Ditch bucket a/a yes
9287 1987 Eeste Tamper 3071230 fav rr:
9332 354 1987 GMC 12-14yd dump truck 1 ODSBC4YSN600449 fair
10544 459 1989 Vermca Chipper IVRC11141KI000600 fair .0+� '
11223 106 1990 OMC 12-14yd dump truck lGDT7D4GXLV500127 poor Cr
11238 107 1990 OMC 12-14yd dump truck lODT713401 V500231 poor
co
Traffic Operations
12566 210 1991 Ford F350 Truck 1 FDKF3708hQW4887 excessive maint p oA
Utilities CD
n/a Pitney Bowes Burster 3324 2277 yes�, �CD
C y,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Grin absent) declared the list of excess property
as surplus and authorized the sale or appropriate disposal of the
items, as recommended in the Memorandum.
U Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 024
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: August 26, 1999
SUBJECT: AUSCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 024
CONSENT AGENDA
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Analyst
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
1. On August 17, 1999 the Board of Commissioners approved purchasing two ambulances
in the current year for the addition of services at new Stations 8 and 11 next year. A
matching grant has also been awarded for 75% of the cost of the ambulances. The
attached entry appropriates funding for $160,000.
2. The Recreation Department has experienced higher enrollment in the summer programs
than anticipated. Revenues have exceeded the budgeted amount by $25,507. Expenses
required to run the camp have also increased due to the number of participants. The
attached entry makes the necessary adjustment.
3. On August 17,1999 the Board of Commissioners approved various expenditures covered
under the 1998/99 State and Local Assistance Grant. The attached entry appropriates the
$20,231 remaining for this grant.
4. The attached entry is needed to reallocate transfers to the Transportation Fund from the
General Fund and the M.S.T.U. Fund.
5. Advanced Life Support charges have exceeded the projected amount for this year. The
attached entry appropriates these funds.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
27
r
6. The Sheriffs Department has requested authorization to withdraw $52,844 from the
Special Law Enforcement Fund. These funds are generated by the sale of confiscated
property and may be expended in accordance with F.S. 932.7055 (4)(b).
7. Indian River County has received two grants for the Wabasso Causeway Beautification
Project for FY 1998/99. On September 8, 1998, the Board of Commissioners approved
a Highway Beautification Grant from FDOT for $137,791.54. Subsequently, the
Commissioners approved a FIND Waterways Assistance Program Grant of $22,000 for
design and permitting of the project. The attached entry appropriates funding.
8. Indian River County Libraries have received donations from the public for $125. The
attached entry appropriates funding.
9. Indian River County has several drug prevention grants that require a 25% local match.
A fund transfer from the General Fund to the Drug Abuse Fund is required to provide
this match.
10. The attached entry transfers the appropriate additional funds to Fleet Management from
various departments.
11. Emergency Management has received reimbursement from the State ofFlorida for travel
expenses during the current year The attached entry appropriates funding.
12. The Sheriffs Department sold surplus and abandoned property at a public auction for a
total of $56,422. This revenue is treated as a current year refund as shown in the attached
entry.
13. The Federal Transit Administration has awarded a Section 5307 Grant to Indian River
County for $632,924. The attached entry appropriates these grant funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget
amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved miscellaneous budget
amendment 024, as recommended in the Memorandum.
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Bair
OMB Director
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
28
[alinb1c)3f l:%Z-IQ IZIN-ARIA11
DATE: August 26. 1999
_I
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
29
BOOK
Entry
Number
Funds/DepartmenttAccount Name
-
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
REVENUES
OPTIONAL ONE CENT SALES TAX/ EMS
Matching Grant
315-000-334-291.00
$120,000
$0
OPTIONAL ONE CENT SALES TAX/ Cash
Forward Revenue
315-000-389-040.00
$40,000
$0
EXPENSES
OPTIONAL ONE CENT SALES TAX/ Advanced
Life Support/ Automotive
315-253-526-066.42
$160,000
$0
2.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Summer Camp Fees
001-000-347-212.00
$15,507
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Program Activity Fees
001-000-347-210.00
$7,000
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/
Recreation Concessions
004000-347-028.00
$3,000
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Recreation/ Other Professional
Services
001-108-572-033.19
$15,507
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Recreation/ Other Salaries
& Wages
001-108-572-011.13
$7,000
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/
Recreation/ Other Professional Services
004108-572-033.19
$3,000
$0
3.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ State and Local Assistance
Grant
001-000-331-023.00
$20,231
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/
Other Operating Supplies
001-208-525-035.29
$3,531
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/
Computer Software
001-208-525-035.12
$1,200
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/
Other Improvements
001-208-525-066.39
$4,000
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/
E D P Equipment -
001-208-525-066.47
$8,000
$0
F-
GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/
Other Machinery & Equipment
001-208-525-066.49
$3,500
$0
I
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
29
BOOK
Entry
Number
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
4.
REVENUES
TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Fund Transfers In
111-000-381-020.00
$0
$300,000
TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Cash Forward
Revenues
111-000-389-040.00
$300,000
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Cash Forward Expense
001-199-581-099.92
$500,000
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Fund Transfers Out
001-199-581-099.21
$0
$500,000
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Fund
Transfers Out
004-199-581-099.21
$200,000
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Cash
Forward Expense
004199-581-099.92
$0
$200,000
5.
REVENUES
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/
A L S Charges
114000-342-061.00
$180,000
$0
EXPENSES
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Fire
Services/ Regular Salaries
114120-522-011.12
$80,000
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Fire
Services/ FLSA
114120-522-011.16
$30,000
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ Advanced
Life Support/ Overtime
114253-526-011.14
$70,000
$0
6.
REVENUES
SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND/
Confiscated Property
112-000-351-020.00
$52,844
$0
EXPENSES
SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND/
Transfers Out - Sheriff
112-600-586-099.04
$52,844
$0
7. IREVENUES
OPTIONAL ONE CENT SALES TAX/ FDOT
Highway Beautification Grant
315-000-334-402.00
$139,792
$0
OPTIONAL ONE CENT SALES TAX/ FIND
Waterways Assistance Program Grant
315-000-334-721.00
$22,000
$0
EXPENSES
OPTIONAL ONE CENT SALES TAX/ Parks/
Wabasso Causeway Beautification
315-210-572-068.09
$161,792
$0
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
30
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
31
Entry
Number
Funds/Department/Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
S.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Donations - North County
Library - General
001-000-366-097.00
$125
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ North County Library/ All
Travel
001-112-571-035.43
$125
$0
9.
EXPENSES
-
GENERAL FUND/ Fund Transfers Out
001-199-581-099.21
$39,445
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Cash Forward Expense
001-199-581-099.92
$0
$39,445
REVENUES
DRUG ABUSE FUND/ Fund Transfers In
121-000-381-020.00
$39,445
$0
DRUG ABUSE FUND/ Reimbursements
121-000-369-040.00
$0
$39,445
10.
EXPENSES
TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Fund Transfers Out
111-199-581-099.21
$70,000
$0
TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Cash Forward
Expense
111-199-581-099.92
$0
$70,000
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT/ Fund
Transfers Out
411-217-534-099.21
$30,000
$0
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT/ Cash
Forward Expense
411-217-534-099.92
$0
$30,000
REVENUES
FLEET MANAGEMENT/ Fund Transfers In
501-000-381-020.00
$100,000
$0
FLEET MANAGEMENT/ Automotive
Maintenance
501-000-395-010.00
$0
$100,000
11.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Reimbursements
001-000-369-040.00
$1,119
$0 '
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management!
All Travel
001-208-525-039.02
$1,119
$0
12.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Sheriff Revenue
001-000-341-052.00
$56,422
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Sheriff/ Law Enforcement
001-600-586-099.04
$56,422
$0
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
31
� f" � '?600 P�1GG p , "_APao
7.J. Computer Components Vendor ListApnroved and Approval
Blanket Purchase Orders over $ 0, 000 Limit to Computer Component
Vendors - T C Computers, Micro Warehouse. CDW, CvberQuvs,
Southern Computer Supplies, Ing
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
Of County Commissioners
DATES August 26, 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVE VENDOR LIST FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER COMPONENTS
APPROVE AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BLANKET PURCHASE ORDERS OVER $5,000
LIMIT TO COMPUTER COMPONENT VENDORS
OMB - CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
The Indian River County Computer Services Department is requesting permission tout"' the vendors listed below
to purchase components to build, up -grade and repair computers and related equipment. Some of these components
will exceed $200 in individual costs, but will be requested to be pat on a blanket requisition. I am also requesting
approval to exceed the $5,000 threshold on blanket purchase orders.
Recommended vendors:
T C Computers
PC Connection
505 Bloomfield Street
Route 101A, 730 Milford Rd.
Jefferson, LA 70121
13.
!REVENUES
Thompson Computer Warehouse
1720 Oak Strut
6306 Benjamin Road
P.O. Box 3014
GENERAL FUND/ FTA Section 5307 Grant
001-000-331-041.00
$632,924
$0
Dolphin Data
200 N. Milwaukee Ave.
4700 14& Ave, Suite 102
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
Clearwater, FL
Cyberguys
EXPENSES
11345 Sunrise Park Dr.
3716 Timber Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Dickinson, TX 77539
GENERAL FUND/ Community Transportation
Coordinator
-
001-110-541-088.23
$632,924
$0
Marietta, GA 30062
7.J. Computer Components Vendor ListApnroved and Approval
Blanket Purchase Orders over $ 0, 000 Limit to Computer Component
Vendors - T C Computers, Micro Warehouse. CDW, CvberQuvs,
Southern Computer Supplies, Ing
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
Of County Commissioners
DATES August 26, 1999
SUBJECT: APPROVE VENDOR LIST FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER COMPONENTS
APPROVE AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BLANKET PURCHASE ORDERS OVER $5,000
LIMIT TO COMPUTER COMPONENT VENDORS
OMB - CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
The Indian River County Computer Services Department is requesting permission tout"' the vendors listed below
to purchase components to build, up -grade and repair computers and related equipment. Some of these components
will exceed $200 in individual costs, but will be requested to be pat on a blanket requisition. I am also requesting
approval to exceed the $5,000 threshold on blanket purchase orders.
Recommended vendors:
T C Computers
PC Connection
505 Bloomfield Street
Route 101A, 730 Milford Rd.
Jefferson, LA 70121
Merrimack, NH 03054
MicroWarehouse
Thompson Computer Warehouse
1720 Oak Strut
6306 Benjamin Road
P.O. Box 3014
Suite 616
Lakewood, NJ 08701-5926
Tampa, FL 33634
CDW
Dolphin Data
200 N. Milwaukee Ave.
4700 14& Ave, Suite 102
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
Clearwater, FL
Cyberguys
Dirt Cheap Drives
11345 Sunrise Park Dr.
3716 Timber Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Dickinson, TX 77539
Southern Computer Supplies, Inc.
All State Contracted Vendors
1800 Roswell Road, Suite 1060
Marietta, GA 30062
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve standardintion by approving blanket purchase
orders be issued to die above vendors. Staff also recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
blanket purchase orders above the $5,000 limit on the above listed vendors.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
32
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved standardization by
approving blanket purchase orders to be issued to the approved
vendors; and approved blanket purchase orders above the
$51,000 limit issued to the same vendors, as follows: T C
Computers, Micro Warehouse, CDW, Cyberguys, and Southern
Computer Supplies, Inc.
7.If. 37th Street Improvements - US#1 to Indian River Boulevard -
Kimley Horn Associates. Inc - Final Payment and Release of
Retainage
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Directo
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.
Capital Projects Manage
SUBJECT: 37°i Street Improvements
US 1 to Indian River Boulevard
Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc.
Final Payment and Release of Retainage
DATE: August 31, 1999
Kimley-Hom Associates, Inc., who provided Professional Engineering Services for the
above referenced project, is requesting Final Payment and Release of Retainage in the
amount of $593.64 for design of improvements on 3r Street.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Board authorize Final Payment and Release of Retainage to
Kimley-Hom Associates, Inc. in the amount of $593.64.
Funding is from account #309-215-541-033.13.
ATTACHMENT
Request for Release of Retainage
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
33
80,9Kray:
BOOK I _ F'A-UE
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) authorized final payment and
release of retainage to Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc., in the
amount of $593.64, as recommended in the Memorandum.
COPY OF AUTHORIZATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.L. Shefifrs Request to Increase Corrections Budget
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: August 31, 1999
SUBJECT: SHERIFF'S REQUEST TO INCREASE CORRECTIONS BUDGET
BUDGET AMENDMENT 025 - CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
The Sheriff has requested the Board of County Commissioners to increase the Corrections
budget by $68,410 to cover additional expenditures relating to the housing of out -of -county
prisoners. These monies will allow us to purchase food, jail supplies and inmate clothing
for the balance of the fiscal year 1998-1999.
The attached entry appropriates funding from the General Fund Cash Forward Reserve.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached
budget amendment.
Vice Chairman Adams questioned the need for this budget amendment, and
Undersheriff Jim Davis explained that the Sheriff s office tried something new this year by
turning all revenue (for out -of -county prisoners) over to the County for the General Fund.
The actual annual revenue for the prisoners was more than a million dollars, but the
Sheriff's office did not retain (in their budget) the cost of $15 per day for housing and
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
34
.7
•
feeding the prisoners.
Vice Chairman Adams recalled that those funds had been allocated back out of the
General Fund during the year with budget amendments, but Undersheriff Davis stated that
this request was only the second time this expense was before the Board this fiscal year.
Administrator Chandler explained that a shortfall had resulted from a combination of
factors. This fiscal year, income and expense were handled differently from past fiscal
years when budget amendments were presented monthly. Also, the number of prisoners
housed fell short of past years, and the request before them was to pay for continued services
to the presently housed prisoners.
Vice Chairman Adams continued to question the need, and Budget Director Joseph
A. Baird further explained that the projected revenue will be short and, as a result, they
would have to go to "cash forward." He estimated the income shortfall would be between
$120,000 to $150,000 of the original projection.
Vice Chairman Adams understood that there was a difference between the charge (to
the other counties) to house prisoners and the actual cost of feeding and housing them and
asked how much of the "profit" was going toward the department's helicopter expenses.
Undersheriff Davis stated that none of the money from out -of -county prisoners was
being used for their helicopters.
Vice Chairman Adams wanted to see the figures in black and white.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) tabled the matter for one week.
ZA Corrective Deed - Tract 8. Section 12, Township 33 South.
Range 38 East - ftuested by Pointe West. andian River Farms
Drains a District
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
35
W r^
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: fl^illiam G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: August 25, 1999
SUBJECT: ' Corrective Deed
On February 6, 1945 Indian River County deeded 20 acres of property in Tract 8,
Section 12, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, to the Indian River Farms
Drainage District. This tract is a portion of the Pointe West traditional
neighborhood design project. Ira Hatch, Esq. on behalf of Pointe West has
requested a corrective deed to clear title to a hiatus resulting from the tract being
40.89 rather than exactly 40 acres.
Because the description is not of the hiatus itself but rather the entire tract, we
have reserved to the County any existing right-of-way for 12th Street and 74th
Avenue, as well as any easements of record.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Quit -Claim Deed to correct the
hiatus in the 1945 deed.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) authorized the Chairman to execute
the Quit -Claim Deed to correct the hiatus in the 1945 deed to
the Indian River Farms Drainage District, as recommended in
the Memorandum.
COPY OF COUNTY DEED IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.N. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Wi
•
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney
DATE: August 27, 1999
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the weeks of August 9, 16 and 23, 1999. Listed below are the vendors names and the amount
of each court related costs.
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
28.00
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
73.50
Park's Rental
Public Defender Costs
11.40
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
38.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
45.50
Debby Thomas
Transcription
129.50
James T. Long, Esq.
Probate Legal Services
300.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
182.00
Celeste L. Hartsfield
Transcription
84.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
164.50
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
129.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
301.00
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
23.24
Vero Orthopedics
Expert Witness
1,400.00
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Carlos Wells, Esq.
Public Defender Costs
12.76
Celeste Hartsfield
Transcription
238.00
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
300.00
Kathy Hubbard
Transcription
177.50
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
120.00
Fred J. Petrilla, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
200.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts - Misd.
900.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts - Felony
4,200.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
38.50
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
49.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
80.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
42.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
73.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
38,50
Olga Mas
Transcription
25.00
Linda Copeland
Transcription
38.50
Linda Copeland
Transcription
126.50
Quality Copy Acquisition
Public Defender Costs
147.20
Medical Record Services
Public Defender Costs
23.01
Linda Copeland
Transcription
164,50
Janet C. Prosper
Transcription
35.00
Brevard Court Services, Inc.
Transcription
71.20
Craig Hartline
Witness Reimbursement
735.08
IRC Sheriff's Mace Unit
Witness Coordination
202.00
Howard Johnson
Witness Coordination
162.00
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
John D. Bruhn, Esq. _
Public Defender Conflict
1,423.95
Investigative Support Special
Public Defender Costs
50.00
Janet C. Prosper
Transcription
56.00
Janet C. Prosper
Transcription
56.00
Quality Copy Acquisition
Public Defender Costs
114.20
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
52.50
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
252.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
35.00
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
37
•
Katharine R. Hammond, Esq.
Katharine R. Hammond, Esq.
Katharine R. Hammond, Esq.
Katharine R. Hammond, Esq.
Katharine R. Hammond, Esq.
Esquire Reporting
Howard Johnson Express Inn
Floyd Evans
Medical Record Services
Cristi Martin
Shirley E. Corbin
Shirley E. Corbin
Peggy Gollnick
Celeste L. Hartsfield
Peggy Gollnick
St. Petersburg Independent
Total
TPO/sw
cc: Judge Kanarek
BOOK JL
U F'E'E
Indigent Dependency Case
1,483.50
Indigent Dependency Case
1,901.07
Indigent Dependency Case
1,413.60
Indigent Dependency Case
924.95
Indigent Dependency Case
5,980.90
Court Reporter
43.75
Witness Management
96.00
Court Interpreter
12.50
Public Defender Costs
22.24
Transcription -
31.50
Transcription
38.50
Transcription
168.00
Transcription
238.00
Transcription
70.00
Transcription
402.50
Expert Witness
600.00
$28,077.55
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
7. D. Annual County Tax Deed Applications - 55 Parcels
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 30, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
6r xv � P.
*4iiv,
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA
Certified Legal Assistant
THRU: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: August 30,1999
RE: Annual County Tax Deed Applications
The Tax Collector has notified us that there are 55 parcels that are now eligible for
tax deed applications (as shown on the attached itemized list). In connection with this
process, there are 20 -year title search fees that have to be paid.
Requested Action: Staff requests that the Board approve the payment of $3,245.00 to
the Tax Collector and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached "Notices to Tax
Co/%tor: p
Attachments: Notices
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
38
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved payment of $3,245 to the
Tax Collector and authorized the Chairman to sign the "Notices
to Tax Collector," as requested in the Memorandum.
7.P. Out -o -Coun& Travel - Vice Chairman Adams - Board of
Directors Meeting - Florida Association of Counties
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 23, 1999:
To: Board of County Commissioners
4103cc1-4
From: Kimberly E. Missung
Executive Aide
Date: August 23, 1999
Subject: OUT OF COUNTY TRAVEL - COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS
CONSENT AGENDA
Please approve out -of -county travel for Commissioner Fran Adams to attend the Board
of Directors meeting of the Florida Association of Counties in Orlando, September 30
and October 1, 1999. The primary agenda focus of this meeting will be the Florida
Association of Counties 1999/2000 budget.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved out -of -county travel for
Vice Chairman Adams to attend the Board of Directors meeting
of the Florida Association of Counties in Orlando, September
30 -October 1, 1999, as requested in the Memorandum.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
kk
BOOK rf��t a' „a
r 1
ei00K ';,
7. . Out -of -County Travel - Commissioner Stanbridge -Workshop:
County Government Roles and Responsibilities
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Kimberly Mas
ung
un 9
Executive Aide
Date: August 31, 1999
Subject: OUT OF COUNTY TRAVEL -
COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE
Please approve out -of -county travel for Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge to
attend the Florida Counties Foundation workshop "County Government
Roles and Responsibilities" to be held September 29, 1999 in Orlando, FL.
This is the last required workshop for Commissioners Stanbridge to attend
as part of the County Commissioners Voluntary Certification Program.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved out -of -county travel for
Commissioner Stanbridge to attend the Florida Counties
Foundation Workshop "County Government Roles and
Responsibilities" to be held September 29, 1999 in Orlando, as
requested in the Memorandum.
7.R. Out -of -County Travel - Chairman Macht - Public Land
Acquisition and Management Annual Partnership Conference
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7. 1999
40
is 0
•
To: Board of County Commissioners _
*W)a.1a41x
From: Kimberly E. MNssung
Executive Aide
Date: August 31, 1999
Subject: OUT OF COUNTY TRAVEL -
COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT
Please approve out -of -county travel for Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
to attend the Public Land Acquisition and Management Annual Partnership
Conference to be held November 17, 18 and 19, 1999 at Panama City
Beach, FL.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved out -of -county travel for
Chairman Macht to attend the Public Land Acquisition and
Management Annual Partnership Conference on November 17-
191, 1999, at Panama City Beach, as requested in the
Memorandum.
7.S. Out -of_ -County Travel - Executive Aide Kimberly Massung
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
To: Board of County Commissioners
m aoatzq
From: Kimberly Mas ung
Executive Aide
Date: August 31, 1999
Subject: OUT OF COUNTY TRAVEL -
KIMBERLY MASSUNG - EXECUTIVE AIDE
I would like permission to attend the Basics of Records Management 1999
Fall Seminar to be held in Orlando, FL on September 16, 1999.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
41
•
E00KE k�Pvo,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) gave permission to Executive Aide
Kimberly Massung to attend the Basics ofRecords Management
_1999 Fall Seminar in Orlando on September 16, 1999, as
requested in the Memorandum.
(CLERK'S NOTE: SEMINAR RESCHEDULED DUE TO
HURRICANE FLOYD TO OCT. 14,1999.)
7. T. Commission on Ethics - Execudve Aide Kimberk Massung
Designated Liaison
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: tX/r1';6"M"ass-<uV
Executive Aide
DATE: August 31, 1999
SUBJECT: COMMISSION ON ETHICS
It has come to my attention that Alice White was the designated liaison between the County
Commission and the state Commission on Ethics, and I suggest for the record that I be named as
the official Liaison Between the Commission and the Commission on Ethics.
Thank you.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) designated Executive Aide
Kimberly Massung as the Official Liaison between the County
Commission and the Florida Commission on Ethics to replace
recently -retired Alice White, as suggested in the Memorandum.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
42
7. U. Approval ofProgress Report & Reimbursement Invoice #2 for
the 1999 Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating,CP
Community Developmentirector
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP <5 -A "
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: August 26, 1999
RE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PROGRESS REPORT & REDvMURSEMENT
INVOICE #2 FOR THE 1999 TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
PLANNING GRANT
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at their regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
It is required, as part of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant contract between the
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as the Designated Official Planning
Agency (DOPA) and the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD),
that periodic progress reports and reimbursement invoices be submitted To comply with the CTD's
requirements, staff has prepared a progress report and invoice for the period from April 1, 1999 to
June 30, 1999.
For the 1999 planning grant period, the invoice and progress report represent the second submittal.
This progress report and applicable finished products, such as the Local Coordinating Board (LCB)
meeting agenda items, CTC reports, etc., are required to accompany all reimbursement invoices.
On August 26; 1999, the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)
reviewed and approved the attached progress report and invoice. At that time, the TDLCB
recommended that the Board of County Commissioners, in its capacity as the Transportation
Disadvantaged Program Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA), approve the attached
progress report and invoice and forward these to the CTD.
Attached is a copy of the progress report and invoice for the April 1, 1999 to June 30, 1999 period.
Finished products such as TDLCB meeting agenda items, CTC reports, and other pertinent reports
are required to accompany all reimbursement invoices. These materials will be submitted to the state
along with the reimbursement invoice and the progress report.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
43
BOOK
The BCC/DOPA's alternatives are either to approve the transmittal of the Progress Report and
reimbursement invoice as submitted, to approve transmittal of the Progress Report and invoice with
revisions, or to deny the transmittal of the Progress Report and reimbursement invoice to the state.
Choosing the last alternative could affect the county's reimbursement of staff time expended for
transportation disadvantaged planning related services.
The TDLCB and the staff recommend that the Board of County Commissioners/DOPA approve
Progress Report and reimbursement invoice #2, and direct staff to transmit the report and the invoice
to the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD).
1. Progress Report and reimbursement invoice #2, 1999 planning grant.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved the Progress Report and
reimbursement invoice #2 and directed staff to transmit the
report and the invoice to the State of Florida Commission for the
Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD), as recommended in the
Memorandum.
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP'S
REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION
USE AND PRELIMINARY PD PLAMPLAT APPROVAL FOR A
PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS ARBOR TRACE (,Quasi -Judicial
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BEARING
IS ON FILE IN TBE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert A Keating, AI P /
Community Development Director
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
44
.4-6.
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: August 25, 1999
SUBJECT: Onsite Management Group's Request for Planned Development (PD) Special
Exception Use and Preliminary PD Plan/Plat Approval for a Project to be
Known as Arbor Trace
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
Triad International Consultants, LLC, on behalf of Onsite Management Group, is requesting planned
development (PD) special exception use and preliminary PD plan/plat approval for a project to be
known as "Arbor Trace". The site is located on the west side of 43"' Avenue, between 5'l Street SW
and 91 Street SW (Oslo Road). The applicant is requesting PD approval to obtain waivers
(reductions) for certain required minimum setbacks and certain required minimum comer lot widths.
The project proposes 151 single-family detached homes on individual lots, all of which meet or
exceed the RS -3 zoning district minimum lot size standards (12,000 sq. ft.).
This PD application supercedes a preliminary plat application for development on the same site for
a project known as "Oak Trace". That preliminary plat application, now nullified, proposed 24 lots
on the subject site and was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its November 12,
1998 meeting.
• PD Project Process
The process involved in review and approval of the subject PD application is as follows:
Approval Needed Reviewing Body
1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception PZC & BCC
2. Preliminary PD Plan/Plat PZC
3. Land Development Permit (LDP) or Waiver Staff
4. Final PD (plat) BCC
The applicant is now requesting approval of the first two steps. If approved by the Board of County
Commissioners, the applicant will need to obtain from public works an LDP or LDP waiver for
required PD improvements.
• Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its meeting of August 12, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered both the special
exception use and preliminary PD plan/plat requests. The commission voted 4-0 (1 abstention) to
recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the PD special exception use request
with conditions (see attachment #5). The Commission also voted 4-0 to grant preliminary PD
plan/plat approval for the project, subject to Board approval of the PD special exception use request.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
45
BOOK PAGE
At its August 121 meeting, the Commission added two approval conditions to those recommended
by staff. One of these additional conditions would require the developer to provide a southbound
right -turn lane at the project's 43rdAvenue entrance. A second additional condition recommended
by the Commission is to require larger lots with a flexible configuration in the northeast comer of
the site.
The two additional conditions recommended by the Commission are included in the recommendation
at the end of this report
1. Size of PD Area: 71.92 acres
Note. The 71.92 acre figure is the project size after dedication of right-of-way for Oslo Road
and 431d Avenue.
2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Residential Single -Family up to 3 units/acre
3. Land Use Designation: L-1, Low Density Residential 1 up to 3 units/acre
4. Phasing: The project is proposed to be constructed in two phases. Phase I will consist of the
south 1,400' of the overall project site and will include the project's main entrance on 431
Avenue. Phase 11 will cover the north 1,100' of the overall site and will include the project's
secondary entrance, which connects to 5h Street SW Each phase can "stand on its own" in
regard to access, stormwater management, density, open space, and recreation area.
5. Density: Overall Site: Maximum Allowed: 3 units/acre (215 units)
Proposed: 2.06 units/acre (148 units)
By Phase: Phase I (88 units on 40.74 acres): 2.16 units/acre
Phase H (60 units on 31.18 acres): 1.92 units/acre
Note: Densities are based upon the 71.92 post -dedication project area.
6. Open Space: Required: 40% (28.77 acres)
Provided: 44.4% (31.95 acres)
Note: Includes minimum of 40% open space on each lot, common green areas and recreation
tracts, pedestrian ways, and credit as provided for in the LDRs for 8.63 acres of lake area
(total lake area is 8.73 acres).
7. Recreation Area and Pedestrian Improvements: The proposed project satisfies the PD
ordinance recreation area and pedestrian system requirements as follows:
Required Recreation Area: 1.77 acres
Provided Recreation Area: 2.32 acres (includes recreation/park tracts and pedestrian
systems)
The recreation/park tracts are all connected to the project's proposed internal pedestrian
system.
The PD plan proposes an internal pedestrian system consisting of a 5' wide sidewalk along
one side of the overall project's internal "loop" roadway and the project's internal east/west
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
roadway. Pedestrian improvements also include access to and around each lake, where a
pedestrian path will be included in the common green space that will be provided around
each lake. The entire internal pedestrian system will be connected to the off-site sidewalks
along 43'a Avenue and Oslo Road. Those connections to the off-site pedestrian system will
be via 5' wide sidewalks that will run from the loop road to the 431d Avenue entrance. A
sidewalk will also extend from the loop road to the 5* Street SW entrance.
It should be noted that, under a conventional subdivision proposal, no recreational area and
no internal pedestrian system improvements (e.g. sidewalks, paths) would be required for
this project.
8. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Sub -lateral Canal, Groves, Vacant, Residential/RS-3
South: Oslo Road, Sub -lateral Canal, Groves, Vacant/RS-3
East: 43`d Avenue, Lateral Canal, Residential, Vacant, Commercial/RS-3, RM -3, CH
West: Grove/RS-3
9. Traffic. Circulation: As required by the LDRs, a traffic impact analysis was prepared by the
applicant and reviewed and approved by Traffic Engineering. That analysis indicates that
a west -bound left turn lane at the project's 51' Street SW entrance is required (see attachment
#4). Also, the paving of 51 Street SW from the project entrance to 43'd Avenue is required.
Both the turn lane improvements and road paving must be completed prior to issuance of a
certificate of completion for Phase II, and will need to be addressed via a developer's
agreement. That developer's agreement will need to be approved by the Board of County
Commissioners prior to issuance of a land development permit for any phase.
The project will have full -movement access points at a 43rd Avenue entrance (Phase I) and
a 5'' Street SW entrance (Phase II). No direct access of any kind is required or provided to
Oslo Road. Internal circulation is provided by an internal "loop" road that will interconnect
both project phases. An east/west road that aligns with the 43rd Avenue entrance will be
provided as well as 12 short cul-de-sacs. Both Traffic Engineering and Emergency Services
have approved the traffic circulation plan.
As previously stated, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation and staffs
recommendation at the end of this report require a southbound right -turn lane at the project's
431 Avenue entrance. Staff s analysis regarding such an improvement is that it is not
technically required under the traffic LDRs based upon anticipated project traffic volumes,
distribution, and current roadway traffic volumes. However, it is staffs opinion that a right -
turn lane would be beneficial to project residents and for 431 Avenue traffic flow. Because
such an improvement would function as part of that entrance, the right -turn lane should be
constructed as part of the project's 431 Avenue entrance during Phase I.
10. Stormwater Management: Each phase is proposed to be served by a 5.15 acre stormwater
management tract. Each of these tracts will contain a lake that covers about 4 'h acres and
has a maximum depth of 12'. The Phase I (south) lake will outfall into the Oslo Road Sub -
lateral Canal. The Phase II (north) lake will outfall into the 5" Street SW Sub -lateral Canal.
Because the site is located in a flood zone, balancing cut and fill on-site is required and will
be accommodated by the lake excavation. Public Works has approved the preliminary
stormwater management plan.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
47
w
F,
The developer has agreed to evaluate the possibility of "over -sizing" the project system'to
determine if run-off from firture Oslo Road or 43d Avenue road improvement projects could
be accommodated within the project. That evaluation will need to be conducted as part of
the land development permit application. If street stormwater nm -off can be accommodated
on-site, Public Works will negotiate with the applicant for accepting street run-off. All
stormwater management and flood protection details and county requirements will be
addressed during review of the project's land development permits:
11. Utilities: County water and sewer service for each lot is required and proposed. A sewer
service lift station for the overall project is to be constructed on "Tract C", located within
Phase I. Utility Services and Environmental Health have no objection to PD plan approval.
12. Dedication and Improvements:
► Right -of -Way : Along the site's t 1,300' of Oslo Road frontage, there exists a 50'
wide strip of Oslo Road right-of-way. A 10' wide strip of additional Oslo Road right-
of-way must be dedicated without compensation as required by the LDRs and as
noted on the PD plans. In addition to the 10' dedication, 70' more right-of-way is
required to bring the total Oslo Road right-of-way up to the 130' ultimate width. The
70' acquisition area is also depicted on the plans and all proposed lots, buffers, and
setbacks are depicted outside of the acquisition area. Therefore, the PD plan
accommodates all of the Oslo Road right-of-way needed to provide the 130' ultimate
width.
Along the site's f 2,500' of 43rd Avenue frontage, there exists a 50' wide strip of 43rd
Avenue road right-of-way. A 10' wide strip of additional right-of-way must be
dedicated without compensation as required by the LDRs. In addition to the 10'
dedication, 40' more right-of-way is required to bring the total 43rd Avenue right-of-
way up to the 100' ultimate width. The 40' acquisition area is also depicted on the
plans and all proposed lots, buffers, and setbacks are depicted outside of the
acquisition area. Therefore, the PD plan accommodates all of the 431d Avenue right-
of-way needed to provide the 100' ultimate width.
The proposed local streets within the project will consist of 50' wide private rights-
of-way (100' radius at each cul-de-sac) that will contain 20' wide paved roads with
curb and gutter drainage. These design elements are consistent with standard LDR
requirements. Streets will be dedicated to a private property owners association. As
required by the LDRs, the right-of-way width at the project's 431 Avenue entrance
will be wider than 50' to accommodate proposed entry median islands.
► Sidewalks: As required by the LDRs and the county's sidewalk/bikeway plan,
sidewalks will be provided along the site's Oslo Road and 431 Avenue frontages.
These are depicted on the PD plan. These sidewalks will be located within public
road right-of-way. The previously described internal project sidewalks will be
located within private right-of-way and common areas and will be owned and
maintained by a private property owners association.
► Street Lights: Streetlights will be provided at all street entrances, intersections, and
curves and will be the responsibility of a private property owners association.
Stormwater and Recreation Tracts: Stormwater tracts and easements, and recreation
tracts will be the responsibility of a private property owners association.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
48
13. Environmental Issues:
Wetlands: Environmental planning staff has confirmed that there are no
wetlands on the site, Therefore, no wetlands regulations apply.
Native Upland Setaside: Since the site is over 5 acres, the native upland
setaside regulations apply to this site. Except for the northeast corner of the
site, the majority of the project is old grove that has been "reclaimed" by a
variety of native and non-native vegetation.
Environmental planning staff indicate that this "reclaimed" area does not
constitute a native upland community. The oak hammock located in the
northeast comer of the site does constitute a native upland community, and
setaside requirements do apply to that area. The applicant can satisfy the
setaside requirements through a conservation easement, fee -in -lieu, or a
combination of the two. The applicant has indicated that the fee -in -lieu
option will be used Fees will need to be paid to the county prior to issuance
of a land development permit.
As previously indicated, one of the additional recommended conditions will
ensure greater preservation of the oak hammock by requiring larger lots and
allowing lot line placement flexibility in the hammock area. This "flexibility
area" is to be limited to no more than 6 lots and encompasses tracts G, H, and
I as shown on the revised drawings. The reason for this recommendation is
to accommodate more extensive preservation of an existing oak hammock
located in the northeast comer of the site. That recommended condition will
result in greater tree preservation and a reduction of project units from 151
to 148. Final lot line configurations will be approved via the final plat, and
all lots will meet or exceed the approved project -wide minimum standards.
14: Waivers: The PD plan proposes no reduction in the RS -3 minimum lot size for any lot. All
lots will meet or exceed the RS -3 minimum lot width standard of 80'. A reduction in the
standard RS -3 comer lot width of 90' is requested for certain corner lots to allow a minimum
corner lot width of 84`. The plan also proposes a reduction in the frontyard setback from 25'
to 20' and a sideyard setback reduction from 15' to 101. These reductions are the same or less
than setback reductions approved with other PDs in nearby L-1 designated areas, namely:
Cypress Lakes (9,830 sq. ft. lots, 85' lot widths, 10' sideyards) and Hammock Lakes (7,465
sq. ft. lots, 70' lot widths, 9' sideyards). The requested waivers are mitigated by the proposed
buffers, increased minimum open space, and provision of common recreation areas.
The requested waivers are summarized and compared in the table below:
Note: The proposed 25 R rearyard setbacks coincide with the required 25 R PD perimeter setback
and the proposed perimeter 25 R wide bufferyards.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
49
�f
BOOK
RS -3 Minimum Standard
Proposed Arbor Trace
Minimum Standard
Lot Size
12,000 sq. R
12,054 sq. R
Lot Width
(interior lots)
SO R
80 R
Lot Width
(corner lots)
90 R
84 R
Frontyard Setback
25 R
20 R
Sideyard Setback
15 R
R
Rearyard Setback
25 R
J25R
Note: The proposed 25 R rearyard setbacks coincide with the required 25 R PD perimeter setback
and the proposed perimeter 25 R wide bufferyards.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
49
�f
BOOK
I
'AGE 12-A-
15. Buffers and Setbacks: Arterial road, active agricultural, and perimeter PD Type "C" buffer
requirements apply to various project perimeters. Buffering is required and provided as
follows:
Perimeter
Minimum Required
Minimum Required PD
- Proposed Buffer
Conventional Subdivision
Buffer
Buffer
East (43rd
Arterial road buffer only (e.g.
Arterial road and PD
Arterial road and PD
Avenue) and
6' wall). No trees or Type
perimeter buffer. equates
perimeter buffer: equates
South (Oslo
"C" buffer required.
to a 25' wide Type "C"
to a 25' wide Type "C"
Road)
buffer with additional
buffer with additional
understory trees and a 6'
understory trees and a 6'
opaque feature.
opaque feature.
A solid masonry wall is
proposed for the opaque
feature.
West (adjacent
Active agricultural and PD
Active agricultural and
Active agricultural and PD
to citrus grove)
perimeter buffer: equates to a
PD perimeter buffer:
perimeter buffer: equates
25' wide Type "B" buffer with
equates to a
to a
a 6' opaque feature.
25' wide Type "B" buffer
25' wide Type "B" buffer
with a 6' opaque feature.
with a 6' opaque feature.
A berm and hedge
combination is proposed
for the opaque feature.
North (adjacent
No buffer or trees required.
25' wide Type "C"
25' wide Type "C" buffer
to 5t' Street SW
buffer.
with additional understory
Canal)
trees.
0
The project's proposed buffers meet or exceed standard LDR and PD buffer requirements.
Final, detailed landscape plans for required buffers, common areas, and recreation/park tracts
must be submitted to planning staff and approved prior to land development permit issuance.
16. Concurrency: The applicant has committed to obtaining a final concurrency certificate
prior to issuance of each single-family building permit and has acknowledged all
concurrency requirements. Therefore, all concurrency requirements related to PD plan and
special exception use approval have been satisfied.
17. Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plant: The county Comprehensive Plan requires that Caribbean
fruit fly host plants be prohibited within PDs located in general areas that have active citrus
groves. This project is located in such an area; therefore, the prohibition regulation applies.
The applicant has indicated that he has no objection to creating a restriction that would
prohibit host plants on the subject property. Such restriction must be included in the
project's covenants and restrictions, which will be reviewed at the time of final plat
application.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
50
0
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant PD
special exception use approval with the following conditions:
1. Caribbean fruit fly host plants are prohibited within the project area.
2. That prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the developer shall:
a. Obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of a developer's agreement
for the paving of 5'h Street SW from the project's 51' Street SW entrance to
431d Avenue, for construction of a westbound left -turn lane at the project's Sm
Street SW entrance, and for construction of a southbound right -turn lane at
the project's 431 Avenue entrance, and
b. Pay to the county the fee -in -lieu of preservation funds necessary to meet the
county upland set-aside requirement, and
C. Obtain planning division approval of detailed, final landscape plans for
required buffers, common areas, and recreation/park tracts, and
d. Obtain approval from Public Works for plans to construct a southbound right -
turn lane at the project's 43"' Avenue entrance.
3. That prior to or via the final plat, the developer shall:
a. Dedicate without compensation 10' of right-of-way for Oslo Road and 431d
Avenue, and
b. Install the applicable required perimeter buffer(s), and
C. Place a restriction on the property that prohibits the planting of Carribean
fruit fly host plants.
4. That prior to issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase I, the required
southbound right -turn lane at the project's 431 Avenue entrance shall be complete.
5. That prior to issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase H, the required 5*
Street SW paving and left -turn lane improvements shall be complete.
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Preliminary PD Plans & Graphics
4. Excerpt from Approved Traffic Impact Analysis
5. Excerpt from Minutes of August 12, 1999 Planning and Zoning Meeting
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
51
�OOa L rK- .� :'
BOOK dD FAGE •a ,
County Attorney Vitunac asked those who wished to speak at this public hearing to
raise their right hand and be sworn. He administered the oath to five people (2 staff and 3
in audience).
Planning Director Stan Boling advised that he had taken the oath and reviewed the
memorandum using pages 118 and 119 from the backup to illustrate leis description of the
request.
The Chairman asked if the Commissioners had any questions; there were none.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) granted PD special exception use
approval with the conditions set forth, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 99-022 -
BOUNDARIES OF ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING
MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT (MSTUI ENLARGED
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 30, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance to Expand the Roseland
Road Street Lighting MSTU Boundaries
DATE: August 30, 1999
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Roseland Property Owners Association is requesting an
additional street light at 125th Place and Roseland Road, which lies
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
52
outside the current district boundaries. Expansion of the
boundaries must be by Ordinance, which requires a Public Hearing.
The draft ordinance is attached.
The expanded district will result in additional properties being
charged the $2/year MSTU assessment. The cost of the light will be
approximately $150 per year.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Staff presents the following alternatives:
Alternative No. 1
Approve the ordinance which provides for the expansion of
the boundaries of the street light district approximately
300' to the west which includes a portion of lot 35, 36
and 37 lying north and south of Roseland Road in Section
22, Fleming Grant. If the ordinance is approved, staff
would proceed to have FPL install the light.
Alternative No. 2
Deny the request.
RECODDMMATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. The Public Hearing is to be
held Sept. 7, 1999.
ATTACHE=
Draft Ordinance
Map
Public Works Director James Davis reviewed the memorandumusing the map onpage
131 of the backup to illustrate his description of the boundaries. He advised that the
maximum increase would be $10 per year to those who owned larger parcels within the area.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) adopted Ordinance No. 99-022
enlarging the boundaries of the Roselan4 Road Street Lighting
Municipal Services Taxing Unit.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
53
BOOK
r- E00K. i 10 DI'lE � 1
ORDINANCE 99 - 2 2
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, ENLARGING THE BOUNDARDIES OF
THE ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING
MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT. -
WHEREAS, residents along Roseland Road have requested that the County
enlarge the boundaries of the Roseland Road street lighting municipal service taxing
unit; and
WHEREAS, the original taxing unit was established by Ordinance 89-33; and
WHEREAS, enlargement of street lighting in the area will further the safety,
health, and well-being of all those residing and owning property within the boundaries
of the new district;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that:
SECTION 1. Amendment of District Boundaries.
The real property included within the new boundaries of this municipal service
taxing unit and subject to all provisions of Ordinance 89-33 is described as set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. Effective date
A certified copy of this ordinance, as enacted, shall be filed by the Clerk
with the Office of the Secretary of State of the state of Florida within ten days
after enactment, and this ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the
Secretary of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, on this 7 t h day of S e p t e m b Q 099.
This ordinance was advertised for a public hearing in the Vero Beach Press
Journal on the ? -1 r,1 day o f a "�, 1999, for a public hearing to be held on 2-tli
day S e p t em b e r , 1999, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner
A d am s , seconded by Commissioner S t a ►, h r ; 6g Lnd adopted by the following
vote:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Vice Chairman Fran Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Absent
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge A y e
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this
7th' dayofSeptember,1999.
e
a
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION o
Attest: INDIANIR
ORIDA
By -�
�Je K Barton, C ennetht, Chairman
• e
g � J
i 9 r
Effective date: This ordinance became effective upon filing with the
5 Q J '3' C Q
Department of State which took place on ay of � �_, 1999.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
54
•
EXHIBIT "A"
AMENDED LIGHTING DISTRICT DESCRIPTION
All lands fronting on each side of Roseland Road between Fleming Grant and the West
line of Old U.S. 1 (now Indian River Drive). Including all of the lands East of Avenue
Five in Van Bergen and Hendry's Addition to Roseland, the plat of which is recorded in
Plat Book 3 Page 39 of the Public Records of Indian River County, EXCEPT Lots 10, 11
and the Easterly part of Lot 9 in Block 1 of the said plat.
All of Section 21 of Fleming Grant EXCEPT Lots 17 through 20; ALSO EXCEPT Tracts
D, E, F and G in Riverwalk II, the plat of which is recorded in Plat Book 12 Page 36 of
the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. ALSO EXCEPT that parcel lying
partly within Tract A of the Van Bergen and Hendry's's Addition to Roseland, described
as follows:
Commence at a concrete monument on Fleming Grant line marking the Southeasterly
corner of Lot 14 of Town of Wauregan. Then run
N260 28'14'W 734.23 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING. Then run N48° OT 19"W
145.0 feet. Then run
N410 52'41"E 230.0 feet to a non -tangent point on a circular curve (said point bears
S67°48' 31 "W 11,459.20 feet from its radius point), said point also lying on Westerly
right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 1, said circular curve being concave to the
Northeast. Thence Southeasterly along the West right-of-way of U.S. Highway No. 1,
traveling along said circular curve for an arc distance of 202.94 feet, thru a central angle
of 01 ° 00'53". Then run
S560 52'41"W 147.92 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING, (OR Book 706 PP 1014).
ALSO EXCEPT any parcel lying between the Easterly line of the present U.S. Highway
No. 1 and the Easterly he of the said Section 21 of Fleming Grant.
In Section 22 of the Fleming Grant, the North 75 feet of Lot 36; the South 100 feet of the
North 175 feet of Lot 36; the South 166.67 feet of Lot 36; Lot 35 EXCEPT the South
100 feet, now known as Sunnyfield Subdivision recorded in Plat Book 10 Page 55 of the
Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; the North 83 feet of Lot 37; the South 82
feet of the North 165 feet of Lot 37; the South 165 feetof the West 288.39 feet of Lot 37.
Date July 8. 1999 Prepared by
Charles A Cramer, P.L.S.
County Surveyor
UGWMCLCAC
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 99-023 - HARBOR
ISLAND CITRUS, INC. - REZONE ±0.34 ACRES FROM CH TO CG
(RZON 99-06-0166) (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
55
•
FF_
n
EOOK
TO: - James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DE TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
I'
obert M. Keating, AIC
Community Developmen Dir or
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP 5 '// -
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: John Wachtel PJ
Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: August 25, 1999
RE: Harbor Island Citrus, Inc., Request to Rezone ±0.34 Acres from CH to CG
(RZON 99-06-0166)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
This is a request to rezone ±0.34 acres from the
CH, Heavy Commercial, District to the CG,
General Commercial, District. The subject
property, shown in Figure 1, is owned by Harbor
Island Citrus, Inc. and is located on the east side
of Old Dixie Highway, ±912 feet south of 45'
Street (North Gifford Road). The purpose of this
request is to secure the necessary zoning to permit
child care uses on the site. On August 12, 1999,
the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to
0 to recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the proposed rezoning.
The subject property is zoned CH and contains a
vacant one-story building. Adjacent land to the
north and east of the subject property is also
owned by Harbor Island Citrus, Inc. and zoned
CH. That land contains a citrus packinghouse.
East of the Harbor Island Citrus packinghouse,
along the west side of US 1, is the Quality Fruit
Packers packinghouse. South of the subject
property, land is zoned CG and contains several
one-story residential buildings.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Figure 1:
Location and Zoning of Subject Property
56
Between 41" Street and 45* Street, along the west side of the F.E.C. Railway, the land use pattern
consists of a mix of residential and commercial uses and vacant land. Directly west of the subject
property, across Old Dixie Highway and the F.E.C. Railway, land is within the CL, Limited
Commercial, District and consists of neighborhood commercial type uses.
The subject property and adjacent properties on the north, south, and east are designated C/I,
Commercial/Industrial, on the future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial
and industrial zoning districts.
To the west, across Old Dixie Highway, land is designated either C/I, CommerciaYindustrial, or M-
2, Medium -Density Residential -2, on the future land use map. The M-2 designation allows
residential uses with densities up to 10 units/acre.
The subject property, a developed site, is not designated as environmentally important nor
environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. No wetlands or native upland plant
communities exist on the site. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does
not contain any flood hazard areas.
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines extend to the site from the
North County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Wastewater collection lines from the Central Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant extend to the site.
Access to the site is from Old Dixie Highway. Classified as an urban collector roadway on the future
roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of Old Dixie Highway is a two lane road with
approximately 66 feet of public road right-of-way. Although the comprehensive plan indicates a
need for up to 14 additional feet of right-of-way by the year 2020, there are no current plans to
expand this portion of Old Dixie Highway.
In terms of permitted uses, there are both similarities and differences between the existing CH
district and the proposed CG district. As a transitional type of zoning district having more intense
uses than general commercial districts and less intense uses than industrial districts, the CH district
is oriented to uses such as warehouses, packinghouses, contractor trades, and repair establishments.
In contrast, the CG district is intended for retail, office, and service commercial development. The
differences between the districts are best illustrated by their purpose statements. These purpose
statements, found in the county's land development regulations, are as follows:
CH, Heavy Commercial District. The CH, Heavy Commercial, district is intended to
provide areas for establishments engaging in wholesale trade, major repair services and
restricted light manufacturing activities. The CH district is further intended to provide
support services necessary for the development of commercial and industrial uses allowed
within other non-residential zoning districts.
CG, General Commercial District. The CG, General Commercial, district is intended to
provide areas for the development of general retail sales and selected service activities. The
CG district is not intended to provide for heavy commercial activities, such as commercial
service uses, heavy repair services nor industrial uses.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
57
6 F.NOK Gu F
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented
Specifically, this section will include:
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for. Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The comprehensive
plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable
standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning district. For commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the
county's land development regulations) is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor
area per acre of land proposed for rezoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis
is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned:
2. Existing Zoning District:
3. Proposed Zoning District:
*0.34 acres
CH, Heavy Commercial
CG, General Commercial
4. Most Intense Use Under Existing Zoning District:
+-3,400 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6`h Edition ITE Manual).
5. Most Intense Use Under Proposed Zoning District:
*3,400 sq, ft, of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6t' Edition ITE Manual).
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from
concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the
requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site.
BY changing the zoning of the subject property from CH to CG, some commercial uses not currently
allowed would be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of the property
would be the same with either zoning district, changing the property's zoning from CH to CG would
not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities.
In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with any new development
or changes of use on site. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
58
•
Located near railroad tracks and several major roads, the subject property is surrounded by
commercial/industrial designated land. For that reason, compatibility is not a major concern
associated with this request. The following three factors, however, indicate that the CG zoning
district on the subject property would be compatible with surrounding land:
1) The zoning pattern in this part of the county indicates that either the existing CH or the
requested CG zoning district would be appropriate for the subject property. In fact, since CG
zoned land abuts the site, the request is for a continuation of the existing zoning pattern.
2) The owner of the site also owns adjacent land on the north and east.
3) The site is adjacent to residential uses on the south. Compared to the CH district, the CG
district is structured to be more compatible with residential uses.
For these reasons, development of the subject property under the requested CG district would be
compatible with surrounding areas.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are Future Land Use Element Policies 1.15 and 1.16.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.15 and 1.16
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.16 states that the commercial/industrial land use designation shall
permit uses that include retail trade, office uses, business and personal services, and other similar
uses. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that all commercial/industrial uses
must be located within the county's urban service area.
Since the subject property is located within the county's urban service area, and the requested CG
district is intended for uses permitted within the commercial/industrial land use designation, the
request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policies 1.15 and 1.16.
While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan
policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for
consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the
request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Environmental protection regulations are the same for both the CH and the CG zoning districts.
Because the subject property is not environmentally significant nor environmentally important,
development of the site will not impact significant natural resources.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
59
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, and is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezoning the site, as requested, will have no
negative impacts on environmental quality or the provision of public facilities and services. The
subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for general commercial uses. The request
meets all applicable criteria. For those reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from the CH, Heavy
Commercial, District to the CG, General Commercial, District by adopting the attached ordinance.
AXIACHMENTS
1. Rezoning Application
2. Approved Minutes of the August 12, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
3. Summary Page
4. Rezoning Ordinance
The Chairman asked the CountyAttorneyto administerthe oath, and CountyAttorney
Vitunac advised that it was not always necessary to have witnesses take the oath; it has been
the practice to do so when there might be a future court case concerning the matter.
Community Development Director Bob Keating then reviewed the memorandum and
recommended the rezoning.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn. absent) Ordinance No. 99-023 amending
the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map from
CH to CG, for the property located on the east side of Old Dixie
Highway, +912 feet south of 45t` Street (North Gifford Road),
as described therein, and providing for an effective date.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
0
M
•
ORDINANCE NO. 99-2 3_
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CH TO CG, FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF OLD DDQE HIGHWAY, ±912 FEET SOUTH
OF 45TH STREET (NORTH GIFFORD ROAD), AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING
FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing for this rezoning
request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board ofCounty Commissioners ofIndian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, RUN WEST 700 FEET
TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH PROPERTY, THENCE RUN NORTH
322.55 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST TO A POINT WHICH IS 150 FEET EAST OF THE
EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR OLD U.S. HIGHWAY #1 A DISTANCE OF 131.25 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY AND
PARALLEL TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF OLD U.S. HIGHWAY #1 A
DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF OLD U.S. HIGHWAY #1 A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OLD U.S.
HIGHWAY #1 A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE RUN EAST A DISTANCE OF 150
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID LAND LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Be changed from CH, Heavy Commercial District, to CG, General Commercial District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on
this Th day of September, 1999.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Joumal on the 25`s day of August, 1999 for a public
hearing to be held on the r day of September, 1999 at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner S t a n b r i d g e , seconded by Commissioner Adams
and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Vice -Chairman Fran B. Adams A v e
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A b s e n t
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge a y P
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
61
•
7
BOOK i tAu.. r F
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY:
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
ATTEST` BY:�`�
Cie�rey K. Barton, k
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
2-/-2-'a5 -
u\v\j\ri\hic I\ zonord.ord
Fr1GrB fir
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 99-024 - MARY H.
EMSELY' S REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 38.37 ACRES
FROM RS -6 TO RM -6 (RZON 99-07-0071) (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BEARING
IS ON FILE IN TBE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 25, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
be M. eatii , Ajit r
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP '94'.-
Chief;
94'.-
Chief Long -Range Planning
FROM: John Wachte
Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: August 25, 1999
RE: Mary H. Knisely's Request to Rezone Approximately 38.37 Acres from RS -6 to
RM -6 (RZON 99-07-0071)
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
62
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
This request is to rezone approximately 38.37 acres from RS -6, Single -Family Residential District
(up to 6 units/acre), to RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). Depicted
in Figure 1 below, the subject property is located at the northeast corner of 27d Avenue and 131
Street, SW (Kelly Road).
9th Stre
et, SW ._ . -.
T.
Subje6dc
Propertyl
S 1 r'r. t '•�"�i
r �
Lwr, uJ` IU:70c• M1 iii UA .14 n�
• r. r -- rr ME r -
• � �-- r� -I r rr -r r
-q r= -� -1
EJ iii =2 -E iii ME i �
The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site with multiple -family
uses. On August 12, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed rezoning.
The subject property is zoned RS -6 and contains one single-family house. Aerial photographs
indicate that citrus groves may have existed on the site in the past. The RS -6 zoned Oslo Park
subdivision of single-family homes is located to the south of the subject property, across 13' Street,
SW. To the west of the subject property, across 27`h Avenue, land is zoned RS -3, Single -Family
Residential District (up to 3 units/acre). That land contains both mobile homes and conventional
single-family homes. Abutting the west half of the subject property's north boundary is the Holiday
Village mobile home park, which is zoned RMH-6, Mobile Home Residential District (up to 6
units/acre). Land along the east half of the subject property's north boundary consists of citrus
groves and is zoned RS -6. East of those groves is the site of the recently approved 176 unit
apartment complex known as The Woods of Vero. Land bordering the subject property's east
boundary consists of heavily wooded scrub habitat. The north half of that land is zoned RM -6, while
the south half is zoned RS -6 and contains a single-family residence.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
63
BOOK'
ri
r-
BOOK Ut--,-J,"
The subject property and all surrounding properties are designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2,
on the county future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up
to 6 units/acre. A commercial/industrial node exists on both sides of 27th Avenue, between 91h Street,
SW, and 5h Street, SW. On the west side of 27' Avenue, that node extends nearly a quarter mile
north of 5h Street, SW, and nearly a quarter mile south of 90' Street, SW. Land within commercial/
industrial nodes is designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on the county fdture land use map. The
C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts.
The subject property is heavily wooded and may contain both native upland plant communities and
wetlands. Adjacent land east of the subject property consists of scrub habitat that may contain
gopher tortoises, a listed species. For that reason, it is possible that gopher tortoises may range on
to or live on the subject property. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property
does not contain any flood hazard areas.
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater service is available to the site
from the South Region Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water service is available to the
site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant.
The site can be accessed by both 27h Avenue and 13" Street, SW. Classified as an urban collector
road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, the segment of 27" Avenue that abuts the subject
property is a two lane road with approximately 80 feet of public road right-of-way. Although the
comprehensive plan indicates a need for an additional 50 feet of public road right-of-way, no
improvements to this portion of 27' Avenue are currently programmed.
The site is also bounded by 13'' Street, SW, an urban collector road on the future roadway
thoroughfare plan map. An unpaved two lane road, 13`h Street, SW, has approximately 30 feet of
public road right-of-way. No improvements to this portion of 13* Street, SW, are currently
programmed.
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented
Specifically, this section will include:
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive
Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development be reviewed
to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
64
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's
LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property
and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency
analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned:
2. Existing Zoning District:
3. Proposed Zoning District:
4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning District:
5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District:
*38.37 acres
RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acre)
RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to
6 units/acre)
230 Single -Family Units
230 Single -Family Units
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from
concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the
requested zoning would not increase the allowed density of the site.
Because the most intense use of the property will not increase, changing the property's zoning from
RS -6 to RM -6 will not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities. In this case, a
detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with any new development on site. That
concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. In addition, Future Land
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
65
EdOK�'� r'�i�L yrs' '*
BOOK J Fr$Ut 9 y
Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service
area
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's future land use
plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district
would allow residential uses no greater than the 6 units/acre permitted by the L-2 designation, the
proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
Future Land Use Element Objective 4
Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of
trips on county roads.
The site is located near several employment centers along 9`' Street, SW, and 27" Avenue. Many
people who work in those employment centers live in moderately -priced, multiple -family housing.
The RM -6 zoning district is intended for such uses. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase
the opportunity for people who work in those areas to live near their jobs, thus reducing the length
of their trips to and from work. For this reason, the request implements Future Land Use Element
Objective 4.
Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3
This objective and policy indicate that the county shall allow and encourage a variety of housing
styles, including multiple -family. By allowing multiple -family development on the subject property,
the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4 and Policy 5.3.
As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and
policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with the
comprehensive plan.
The following factors generally indicate that the subject property is appropriate for multiple -family
development:
• the site is adjacent to a major road, and new a major intersection;
• the site is adjacent to a mobile home park;
• the site is adjacent to an existing multiple -family zoning district; and
• the site is near commercially zoned land.
The following factors indicate that potential impacts on surrounding property could be mitigated:
• Public right-of-way separates land to the west and south from the subject property. On the
west, 27th Avenue has 80 feet of public road right-of-way. On the south, 90 feet of road and
canal right-of-way separate the subject property from property in the Oslo Park subdivision.
• Setbacks provide an additional 45 to 50 feet of separation between buildings on the site and
buildings on surrounding property. County land development regulations require multiple -
family developments to provide trees and hedges along thoroughfare plan roads (such as 13''
Street, SW and 27h Avenue) and vegetative buffers and opaque features where they abut
single-family zoning districts.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
• Multiple -family projects must go through the site planning process. Through that process
potential impacts can often be mitigated by site design such as the placement of buildings,
parking areas, open space, stormwater management areas, and landscaping.
For these reasons, staff feels the requested zoning district would be compatible with adjacent
residential development.
Environmental protection regulations for the subject property are the same under both the existing
RS -6 and the requested RM -6 zoning districts. In either case, the county's 10115% set aside
requirement applies to any native upland plant communities on site. If an environmental survey
determines that wetlands exist on the site, federal, state and local wetland protection regulations
apply. If the environmental survey indicates that listed species live on the site, federal and state
regulations apply. For these reasons, no adverse environmental impacts associated with this request
are anticipated.
Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with
surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will
have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most
importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for multiple -family residential
uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from RS -6 to RM -6
by adopting the attached ordinance.
ATTACIFAMNTS
1. Rezoning Application
2. Approved Minutes of the August 12, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
3. Summary Page
4. Rezoning Ordinance
County Attorney Vitunac did not administer the oath.
CommunityDevelopmentDirector Bob Keatingreviewedthememorandumusing the
zoning map on page 152 to illustrate his presentation. He recommended the Board approve
the request by adopting the ordinance.
Commissioner Stanbridge inquired about the RS -6 parcel (now a grove) to the north
of the subject property.
Director Keating advised that the property is currently vacant. Staff has suggested to
those property owners that they also consider rezoning their property to RM -6. While the
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
AA
DOOK FquE A
owners had no opposition, he understood they had a concern that the taxes might be
increased if it were rezoned to RM -6.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Rene Renzi, 340 E. Waverly Place, observed there is a lot of development action
along Oslo Road and inquired about the certainty of an interchange at Oslo Road and I-95.
Director Keating explained that boththe MPO's TransportationPlan and the County's
Transportation Element do include an Oslo Road interchange in their long-range plans. The
County is currently working with a consultant who is preparing an Interchange Justification
Report (ITR), which is about 1/3 complete. It will probably be another 8 to 9 months before
it is completed and that will be the real determination as to whether there will be an
interchange in the near future. Depending on funding, it would probably not occur before
7-10 years at the earliest.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) adopted Ordinance No. 99-024
amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning
Map from RS -6 to RM -6, for property located at the northeast
comer of 27 h Avenue and 1311 Street, SW (Kelly Road) and
further described therein, and providing for an effective date.
ORDINANCE NO. 99-2 4
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RS -6 TO RM -6, FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 27TH AVENUE AND 13TH
STREET, SW (KELLY ROAD), AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
68
CJ
•
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing for this rezoning
request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
ALL OF TRACT 5, SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, (LESS
ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS) INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY S/D; ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID LANDS LYING IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 38.37 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Be changed from RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), to RM -6, Multiple -
Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on
this 7t' day of September, 1999.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 25'h day of August, 1999 for a public
hearing to be held on the 76 day of September, 1999 at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner S t a n b r i d g e , seconded by Commissioner Adams ,
and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Kenneth R Macht A y e
Vice -Chairman Fran B. Adams Ayp
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn A h s p n t
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge A y p
Commissioner John W. Tippin A y e
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN COUNTY
BY:
Kenneth R Macht, Chairman
ATTEST BY:
ey Barton, C
This rdinance was filed with the Department of State on
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
the following date:
BOOK .'' _
rAT- AN
CEM
the following date:
BOOK .'' _
r^^r•• 11//��11IrrIII
2.000 hO I +L� F tl
r. • e
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - ROSELAND UNITED METHODIST
CHURCH REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL
FOR A BUILDING ADDITION
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 23, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Community Development
FROM: Stan Boling AICP
Planning Director
DATE: August 23, 1999
SUBJECT: Roseland United Methodist Church Request for Special Exception Use
Approval for a Building Addition
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
Architect John Dean, on behalf of Roseland United Methodist Church, has requested minor site plan
and special exception use approval for a 3,580 sq. & building addition to the existing Roseland
United Methodist Church main building located at 12962 Roseland Road, between 129` Court and
129' Place. The proposed use is for church classroom and office area; no daycare or school use is
proposed. Because the site is zoned single-family residential, and the proposed addition exceeds
10% of the existing church floor area, special exception use approval is required for the project.
Staff has reviewed and approved the minor site plan application for this project, subject to the Board
of County Commissioners granting special exception use approval. Therefore, the minor site plan
approval will become effective upon approval of the special exception use request.
At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to approve, approve with conditions, or deny
the request to expand the special exception use. Pursuant to section 971.05 of the land development
regulations (LDRs), the Board is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject
site and surrounding area and ensure compliance with applicable specific land use criteria for places
of worship. The Board may attach reasonable conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate
impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
70
•
•
Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of August 12, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to
recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the special exception request (see
attachment #4).
1. Area of Development: 39,600 sq. ft.
2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Residential Single -Family up to 3 units/acre
3. Land Use Designation: L-2, Low Density Residential 2, up to 6 units/acre
4. Building Floor Area: Existing: 10,852 sq. ft.
Proposed 3.580 sq. ft. (classrooms and office)
Total: 14,432 sq. ft.
Note: The 3,580 sq. ft. of additional building area will consist of 1,912 sq. ft. of added
building area plus 1,668 sq. ft. of existing porch/corridor area that will be enclosed.
5. Other Improvements: In addition to the building addition, a small, secured (walled -oft)
outdoor playground area will be constructed.
6. Open Space: Required: 40%
Provided: 57%
7. New Impervious Surface Area: 1,912 sq. ft.
8. Off -Street Parking: Because no increase in sanctuary area or sanctuary seating is proposed,
no additional parking spaces are required. All existing parking spaces will remain, including
the main parking lot located on the south side of Roseland Road.
9. Stormwater Management: The site's existing stormwater management system will handle
the proposed small increase in impervious surface area. Public Works has no objection to
site plan approval.
10. Utilities: The site is currently served by county water and a septic system, and will continue
to be so served after project completion. County Utility Services has no objection to site plan
approval. Project construction will include relocation of the septic system and a grease trap,
which must be permitted through the Environmental Health Department. Subject to that
permitting, Environmental Health has no objection to site plan approval.
11. Landscape Plan: Along the portion of the project construction area that fronts Roseland
Road, landscape improvements (understory trees and shrubs installed in a planter) will be
added to the site's existing canopy trees. These improvements will satisfy Chapter 926 and
971 landscape requirements as applied to the project area of development. -
12. Traffic: It is estimated that the proposed project will result in only a small traffic increase.
Therefore, no off-site traffic improvements are required. Also, no changes in parking or
traffic circulation are proposed, and none are required. Traffic Engineering has no objection
to site plan approval.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
71
BOOK
13. Specific Land Use Criteria for Places of Worship: The project is subject to the places of
worship specific land use criteria of Chapter 971.28(5)(d). These criteria are as follows:
a. No building or structure shall be located closer than thirty (30) feet to any property
line abutting a residential use or residentially designated property;
Note: The proposed addition will be located more than 30' from any property boundary.
b. Access shall be from a major thoroughfare unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department;
Note: No new access points are proposed. The site fronts a major thoroughfare roadway, and
the existing access points were approved by the Public Works Department under previous
site plans.
C. Any accessory residential use, day care facility or school upon the premises shall
provide such additional lot area as required for such use by this section and shall
further be subject to all conditions set forth by the reviewing procedures and
standards for that particular use. Accessory residential uses may include convents,
monasteries, rectories or parsonages as required by these regulations;
Note: No accessory residential, day care, or school use is proposed.
d. A Type "C" buffer shall be provided along all property boundaries where the facility
is located adjacent to a single-family residentially zoned property. A Type "D" buffer
shall be provided along all property boundaries when the facility is located adjacent
to a multiple -family residentially zoned property or agriculturally zoned property
having a residential land use designation.
1. The Board of County Commissioners may waive or reduce the buffer
requirements where the place of worship is located next to an existing
cemetery, place of worship, child care facility, community center, or
school. Consideration shall be given to security, noise, and visual
impacts. Where a waiver or a buffer reduction is granted, normal
perimeter landscaping requirements shall apply, and alternative
requirements (such as fencing) may be required.
Note: The proposed facility fronts one site perimeter only; that perimeter being the Roseland
Road frontage of the project construction area. That construction area is separated from a
single-family zoned property (owned by the church) by Roseland Road, a thoroughfare plan
road. In accordance with landscape ordinance section 926.08(5), the separation provided by
Roseland Road reduces the buffer requirement from a Type "C" to a Type "D". The
proposed plan provides a Type "D buffer between the project construction area and
Roseland Road. Therefore, this specific land use criterion is satisfied.
Based on the above analysis, the proposed project satisfies all applicable places of worship specific
land use criteria.
14. Concurrency: The applicant has committed to obtaining a final concurrency certificate
prior to issuance of a building permit and has acknowledged all concurrency requirements.
Therefore, all concurrency requirements related to minor site plan and special exception use
approval have been satisfied.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
72
15. Dedications and Improvements: Because the project involves minor site plan approval
rather than major site plan approval, no road paving or sidewalk requirements apply.
However, it should be noted that the existing sidewalk along Roseland Road will remain.
At this time no right-of-way is required from this site for Roseland Road which consists of
an 80' wide right-of-way along the subject site. Also, it should be noted that no project
building improvements are proposed within the Roseland Road future ultimate right-of-way
area (120' width).
16. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Residential/RS-3
South: Roseland Road, Church Parking Lot/RS-3
East: 129* Place, ResidentiaM-3
West. 129`' Court, Residential/RS-3
Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
special exception use approval for the proposed church building addition.
1. Application
2. Location Maps
3. Site Plan
4. Excerpt from August 12, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the memorandum using pages 161 and 162
to assist in his presentation. In recommending approval of the request he pointed out that the
proposed addition was for church -use only and not for a day care or a school.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) granted special exception use
approval for the proposed church building addition, as
recommended by staff.
9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM -PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED
FOR 9/14/99 - COUNTY -INITIATED REQUEST FOR AMENDING THE
TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 30, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
73
BOCK
� f �.U-t .
BOOK P A c E
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Ir
Robert SE Keating,
Community Development D' for
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP S 'Ivy
Chief; Long Range Planning
FROM: Peter J. Radke� .
Economic Development Planner
DATE: August 30, 1999
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for the September 14,1999 Board Meeting
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
DESCRIMON AND CONDiTIONC:
Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration at
its September 14, 1999 meeting.
1. County initiated request to amend the text of the comprehensive plan. (Legislative)
The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board's information. No action is
needed.
The Chairman read the title into the record.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TARN.
(CLERK'S NOTE: NUMING SUBSEQUENTLY CANCELED
DUE TO HURRICANE FLOYD AND RESCHEDULED FOR OCT. 14, 1999.)
9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE MM -PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED
FOR 9/14/99 - TOBACCO ORDINANCE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 1, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
0
74
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney's Office
DATE: September 1, 1999
RE: Tobacco Ordinance
At the request of SWAT, a student group against the use of tobacco products, the
Board directed our office to prepare the attached ordinance, which will be
presented to the Board for final adoption September 14, 1999. The ordinance makes
it a violation of County ordinance to sell tobacco products by means of self-service
merchandising in any establishment which allows people under the age of 18 to shop.
Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board adopt this ordinance after
public hearing.
The Chairman read the title into the record.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
(CLERK'S NOTE: MEETING SUBSEQUENTLY CANCELED
DUE TO HURRICANE FLOYD AND RESCHEDULED FOR OCT. 14,1999.)
9.C.3. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM- PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED
FOR 9/14/99 - MOTOR VEHICLE TITLE LOAN INDUSTRY
REGULATION ORDINANCE
The Board reviewed the following title for the proposed ordinance:
Public Hearing - September 14, 1999
Public Notice Item - September 7, 1999 Agenda
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PERTAINING TO REGULATION OF
THE MOTOR VEHICLE TITLE LOAN INDUSTRY;
PROVIDING A TITLE; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS;
PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS FOR ENGAGING
IN TITLE LOAN TRANSACTIONS; PROVIDING
FOR A MAXIMUM INTEREST RATE; PROVIDING
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
75
BOOK
EOE L3
FOR REQUIREMENTS UPON TRANSACTION
SATISFACTION AND DEFAULT; PROVIDING FOR
RIGHT TO REDEEM AND LOST TITLE LOAN
AGREEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR LICENSES;
PROVIDING FOR RECORD KEEPING
REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING FOR VIOLATIONS;
PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND
PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR HEARINGS AND
APPEALS; PROVIDING FOR TRANSITION PERIOD;
PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF LAWS IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILM.- PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION
IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The Chairman read the agenda item title into the record.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TARN.
(CLERK'S NOTE: ME=G SUBSEQUENTLY CANCELED
DUE TO HURRICANE FLOYD AND RESCHEDULED FOR OCT. 14, 1999.)
11.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING DATE SCHEDULED FOR ADOPTION
OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS a DR) AMENDMENTS -
WABASSO CORRIDOR PLAN AND PRIVATE PIERS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
ilo
Robert M. Keating, Al
Community Development Direc
FROM: Stan Bo1mAICP
Planning Director
DATE: August 31, 1999
SUBJECT: Request to Set Public Hearing Date for Adoption of Land Development
Regulation (LDR) Amendments: Wabasso Corridor Plan and Private Piers
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
76
BACKGROUND:
On May 4, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners held its second of two public hearings on a
set of proposed LDR amendments. Those amendments included proposed changes to the Wabasso
Corridor Plan requirements and allowances for "private piers" designed for non -boating uses. At the
May 41' hearing, the Board tabled adoption of the Wabasso Corridor Plan and private piers
amendments so that these proposals could be workshopped and then brought back to the Board.
Recently, these proposals were workshopped and staff is now requesting that the Board schedule a
public hearing at which it will consider adoption of proposed LDR amendments related to these two
proposals.
ALYSIS:
■ Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements
On May 4,1999, the Board of County Commissioners held its second public hearing on a set of land
development regulation (LDR) amendments that included proposed changes to the Wabasso Corridor
Plan requirements (see attachment #1). The proposed changes had originated from several Wabasso
Corridor Plan Task Force workshops and had been reviewed by the Professional Services Advisory
Committee (PSAC) and the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC). At its May 46 meeting, the
Board directed staff to hold a public workshop to get input from Wabasso area residents and to report
back to the Board with recommendations (see attachment #2).
On August 23, 1999, staff held a 6:30 pm public workshop in Wabasso at the Environmental
Learning Center. Prior to the workshop, staff sent to area property owners and residents a letter that
contained a meeting notice and a summary of the proposed LDR changes. The August 23 d
workshop was attended by approximately 55 citizens and two Commissioners, and included an
opening staff presentation and an extensive question and answer period. General input from the
workshop is presented in the attached meeting summary (see attachment # 3).
At the end of the workshop, there appeared to be general support for the proposed LDR amendments,
and some support for developing higher standards and/or greater restrictions within the corridor for
CR 510 properties located east of US 1. In staffs opinion, the August 231d workshop helped to
verify that there is general support for the proposed LDR amendments, especially since those
amendments would address some concerns expressed about current allowances. There seem to be
strong opinions but no consensus on developing stricter standards along CR 510 east of US 1.
■ Private Piers
Private observation/fishing piers
On May 4, 1999, at the second of two advertised public hearings on proposed LDR amendments, the
Board directed staff to hold a workshop on the issue of "private piers" and report back to the Board
(see attached minutes).
On August 27, 1999, staff held a public workshop on private piers. At the workshop, after a
discussion of concerns expressed at the May 4' Board hearing, there was a consensus among
workshop attendees for the County to revise the LDRs to distinguish private observation/fishing
piers from boat docks, and to allow such piers in the unincorporated county, subject to the following
conditions:
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
77
rCOOKPAGE
• limit private observation /fishing piers to a water depth of two feet mean high water
(MHW) or less
• require appropriate signage on all private observation/fishing piers stating prohibition
of boat mooring
• limit maximum length/projection of private observation/fishing piers to 35 feet
beyond water's edge (MHW line) or 25% of the waterway's width, whichever is less
• require railings with pickets or similar bars along the water -ward sections of the
access walkway and terminal platform (as a deterrent to boat dockages)
• require the deck to be at least five feet above MHW
• prohibit private observation/fishing piers in the Pelican Island National Wildlife
Refuge (due to overriding public interest)
It is staffs position that it would be appropriate to incorporate these conditions into LDR Chapter
932, Coastal Management, the chapter that currently contains regulations for single-family docks.
Staff is requesting Board authorization to set a public hearing for adoption of an amendment to
Chapter 932 (and Chapter 901, Definitions) relating to allowance of private observation/fishing piers
subject to the conditions specified above.
■ Public Hearing for the Amendments
Both proposed amendments can be considered at the same public hearing. The proposed
amendments may be adopted at a regular Board of County Commissioners meeting, subject to
required public advertizing timefirames. One hearing date that would meet such timeframes is the
regular Board meeting of September 28, 1999.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners set a September 28, 1999 public hearing
date, or any other date that complies with advertizing timeframes, for adoption of the proposed LDR
amendments related to Wabasso Corridor Plan requirements and private piers.
1. Proposed Changes to Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements
2. Excerpt From May 4, 1999 Board of County Commissioners Minutes
3. August 23, 1999 Wabasso Corridor Meeting Summary
Planning Director Stan Boling briefly reviewed the above memorandum.
In response to Chairman Macht's concerns about the penalty for using a pier for a
dock, County Attorney Vitunac stated that penalties will depend on how the case is
prosecuted. If prosecuted by the Code Enforcement Board, the penalty would be to correct
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
78
the action or be fined. If the case is taken to criminal court, the penalty is a fine of up -to -
$500 and 6 months in jail.
Believing that it was inappropriate to put someone in jail for this type of violation,
Chairman Macht suggested that revocation of the permit and removal of the pier might be
appropriate and a deterrent.
County Attorney Vitunac understood the suggestion and Community Development
Director Bob Keating advised that staffwould investigate the suggestion and bring back their
recommendation at the public hearing.
Commissioner Stanbridge suggested new terminology be used since the words "dock"
and "pier" are used interchangeably, and Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement
Chief Roland M. DeBlois stated that staff is recommending the term "observation/fishing
pier".
Chairman Macht concurred with the Task Force and suggested that a sign be affixed
saying "No Docking is Permitted".
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Grin absent) scheduled the public hearing date
for September 28, 1999, as recommended in the memorandum.
11.A.2. AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE A REQUEST FOR
PROPOSALS TO SELECTANAFFORDABLE HOUSINGDEVELOPER
TO RECEIVE A STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP
(SHIP) FUND SET ASIDE THAT CAN BE USED TO MATCH HOME
INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (HOME)FUNDS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Direct
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICPS -10�.
Chief, Long -Range Planning
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
79
DATE: August 31, 1999
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE A REQUEST FOR
PROPOSALS TO SELECT AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPER TO
RECEIVE A STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) FUND
SET ASIDE THAT CAN BE USED TO MATCH HOME INVESTMENT
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (HOME) FUNDS.
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
BACKGROUND
The county's Local Housing Assistance Program has been in effect since June of 1993. During that
time, the county has provided 368 loans to individual applicants who applied for assistance.
According to state rules and regulations as well as the county's requirements, SHIP funds may also
be used to supplement or match other state and federal funds such as the Home Investment
Partnership (HOME) Program.
In the past, the county has used SHIP funds to match CDBG funds in the Wabasso area. As of this
time, however, the county has not set aside SHIP funds for any private developers. Recently, a
private developer contacted county staff and requested that a portion of the county's SHIP funds be
set aside for use by his clients as part of a development project to be partially funded through the
HOME program. For FY 1999-2000, the county is scheduled to receive $750,755.00 of SHIP funds.
As structured, the HOME program provides down payment and closing cost assistance to eligible
persons for purchase of affordable housing. The HOME program assistance takes the form of a no
interest, non -amortized, second mortgage loan to the homebuyer. That loan does not have to be paid
back as long as the borrower continues to reside in the house and occupies it as his principal
residence. The remaining cost of the house is financed with a first mortgage loan through sources
such as FHA, sub -prime lenders, or others. HOME funds must be used for down payment and
closing costs associated with the purchase of single-family, owner occupied affordable housing units
by very low and low income households.
To receive HOME funds in the current cycle, interested affordable housing developers must apply
to the state by November 12, 1999. Like many grant programs, the HOME program is a competitive
grant process. To maximize scores in this process, applicants need to secure a local match.
One source of funds which may be used as a local match for HOME program funds is SHIP money.
As part of a HOME grant project, SHIP funds may be used to pay all or a portion of applicable
impact fees. In that case, a bank or other financial institution would take a first mortgage; the
HOME program would take a second mortgage, and the SHIP program would take a third mortgage
on each assisted home.
Recently, a developer approached county staff and requested that the county set aside $360,000 in
SHIP funds over three fiscal years for his use as a HOME program match. Staff informed the
developer that no SHIP funds could be set aside for the exclusive use of one developer unless all
developers had the opportunity to apply for SHIP set aside funds through a competitive selection
process. As a result, staff has developed the attached request for proposals (RFP) to competitively
select a developer for whom SHIP funds will be set aside for use as a HOME program local match.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
80
ANALYSIS -
One of the goals of the county's local housing assistance plan is to increase home ownership for very
low and low income households. In many cases, an eligible household can afford a mortgage
payment, but cannot save money for a down payment and closing costs. With a combination of
HOME program funds and SHIP program funds, eligible households may have the opportunity to
acquire a housing unit which is affordable.
While implementing the county's local housing assistance plan, the county must ensure that all state
requirements and local requirements are met. One state requirement is that all funds for a state fiscal
year must be encumbered within 12 months after the end of the fiscal year and must be expended
within 24 months after the end of the fiscal year. With the county's SHIP program income
increasing every year, that requirement may become difficult to meet in future years.
Since establishment of the county's affordable housing trust fund, the amount of SHIP funds
deposited in the SHIP trust fund has increased due to two principal factors. First, the SHIP
allocation amount that the county receives from the state has increased. In the first 3 years of the
program, the county's allocation was $250,000.00 per year; for FY 1998-1999, the county received
$903,723.00. Second there are more and more applicants who are paying back their loans, with the
loan repayment amounts added to the SHIP trust fund. In FY 1998-99, the trust fund's other
program income totaled $79,185.15.
So far, all SHIP funds have been expended in a timely manner, mainly due to the large demand
existing in the community and the efforts made by local financial institutions to utilize SHIP funds
for their eligible clients. Staff, however, believes that, with the increased funding in the future, it
may become more difficult to utilize SHIP funds through only individual applications. At this
point, it seems feasible to set aside up to $150,000 of the county's annual SHIP allocation for use
by eligible clients of an affordable housing developer.
Currently, the County's local housing assistance program provides for impact fee loans to very low
and low income persons. If authorized by the Board, the County will advertise the attached RFP
for a set aside of up to $150,000 of the county's SHIP allocation per fiscal year for the next three
fiscal years. This set aside amount of SHIP funds will be available for the exclusive use of the
selected developer's clients as a local match for HOME funds. As a requirement of this set aside,
the selected developer will assist his clients in obtaining first mortgages from a bank and second
mortgages for down payment and closing costs from the HOME program. The County will then
provide a SHIP loan to the developer's clients for appropriate impact fees.
By setting aside a certain amount of SHIP funds and thereby assuring a developer that his qualifying,
eligible clients will receive SHIP loans, the county will benefit in several ways. First, the set aside
will increase the probability that a local development project will receive state HOME funds.
Second, the set aside will ensure that a certain amount of the annual SHIP allocation will be
encumbered. Third, the set aside will make distribution of a portion of the annual allocation more
efficient. Finally, the set aside will enhance the county's economy by increasing the amount of new
construction.
Through the developer selection (RFP) process, staff will ensure that the developer chosen to receive
the SHIP set aside will meet all SHIP requirements, including credit and income eligibility,
employment status, maximum assets, and others. Also through this process, staff will ensure that
the selected developer will provide a sufficient amount of SHIP funds to very low income
households.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
81
BOOK
GGOOK I � �,-! Pr1,l--r:3,I—
P,,,
ALTERNATIVES
The Board of County Commissioners has two alternatives regarding the proposed SHIP fund set
aside and the draft RFP. These alternatives are:
Not to set aside SHIP funds and not to advertise the RFP
To set aside SHIP funds and to advertise the RFP
Based on the analysis, staff supports the second alternative.
DEVELOPER SELECTION CONIlVIITTEE
If the Board decides to set aside the SHIP funds and directs staff to initiate the RFP process, a
developer selection committee will be established to review the proposals, rank the proposals, and
recommend selection of a developer. A three member committee consisting of the community
development director, a representative from the county attorney's office (Terrence O'Brien), and a
representative from the budget office (Jason Brown) may perform this task.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners :
• agree to set aside $150,000 of SHIP funds per fiscal year for the next three fiscal years for
eligible clients of affordable housing developers ;
• authorize the Community Development Director to advertise the attached RFP;
• direct the community development director to establish a three member developer selection
committee to process proposals, rank proposals, and recommend selection of a developer,
and submit the results of the ranking to the Board for approval.
Attachments
1. Draft notice of request for proposal
2. Draft request for proposal document
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the memorandum and
explained the alternatives and recommendation in detail. He advised that other counties are
using similar processes. The County's probability of receiving HOME funds would be
enhanced by moving forward with staff's recommendation.
Chairman Macht thought the term "developer" implies a development, and Director
Keating explained that in discussions with a developer, he would get one parcel of property,
actually subdivide it into single family lots that meet the zoning criteria of the district and
build the single family homes and sell them to individuals who would get the financing and
who would actually get the SHIP and HOME funds and a conventional mortgage.
Commissioner Tippin stated that the developer who has been discussing this matter
with staffhas a special interest in a property owned by a relative and he would like to abstain
from the vote.
SEPTEMBER 7. 1999
82
County Attorney Vitunac asked if the vote would in any way affect Commissioner
Tippin's personal financial interest, and Commissioner Tippin explained that if the property
is sold, it is possible he would receive funds from the sale.
voting.
County Attorney Vitunac opined that Commissioner Tippin should abstain from
(CLERK'S NOTE: CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS ON FILE
WITH THE BACKUP OF THIS MEETING
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD.)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (3-0,
Commissioner Tippin abstained and Commissioner Ginn absent)
approved staffs recommendation as follows: agreed to set aside
$150,000 of SHIP funds per fiscal year for the next three fiscal
years for eligible clients of affordable housing developers;
authorized the Community Development Director to advertise
the proposed RFP; and directed the Community Development
Director to establish a three-member developer selection
committee to process proposals, rankproposals, andrecommend
selection of a developer and submit the results of the ranking to
the Board for approval, as recommended by staff.
11.A.3. REQUEST FROM WESTONREAL ESTATE EWESTMENT
CORP. FOR PERMISSION TO RELOCATE GOPHER TORTOISES
FROM THE BERMUDA CLUB DEVELOPMENT SITE TO THE
WABASSO SCRUB CONSERVATION AREA
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEYI&N4ENT HEAD CONCURRgNCE:
Ro M. Keating, A1 -CP
Community Development Dire for
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois��CP
Chief, Environmental Planning
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
83
Fi
BO0K
DATE: August 31, 1999
SUBJECT: Request from Weston Real Estate Investment Corporation for permission to relocate
gopher tortoises from the Bermuda Club development site to the Wabasso Scrub
Conservation Area
It is requested that the data herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at
its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
On April 6, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Conceptual Planned Development (PD)
and Special Exception Use for the Bermuda Club project, located between the Indian River Lagoon and S.R.
AIA, north of Sea Oaks development. An environmental survey that was required for permitting of the
Bermuda Club project revealed the presence of approximately two dozen gopher tortoises residing on the
property. Gopher tortoises are listed as "species of special concern" by the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FWC).
The FWC requires a developer of occupied gopher tortoise habitat to relocate tortoises to an approved
relocation site or, as an alternative, to pay into an FWC conservation fund earmarked for acquisition and
protection of gopher tortoise habitat.
Environmental Services, Inc., environmental consultant for the developers of Bermuda Club (Weston Real
Estate Investment Corporation), is requesting permission from the County to use the Wabasso Scrub
Conservation Area as a recipient site of tortoises relocated from the Bermuda Club property. As such, this
matter is being presented for Board consideration to allow the relocation.
The Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area was acquired in 1995 under the county environmental lands
program with a 50% cost -share grant from the Florida Communities Trust (FCT). The approved
management plan for the property provides that the primary objective of the purchase was resource
conservation, with a secondary objective of compatible passive recreational access. The County has
received scrub jay mitigation credit for a portion of the Wabasso Scrub property relating to expansion of
C.R. 512 in Sebastian. The Wabasso Scrub property is also a key mitigation component of the Sebastian
Area -Wide Scrub -Jay Habitat Conservation Plan that is near completion.
Scientific research suggests that the carrying capacity of gopher tortoises for habitat purposes is roughly
two tortoises per acre. Environmental Services, Inc. is requesting permission to relocate up to 24 gopher
tortoises to the southeast —28 acres of the Wabasso Scrub property, provided a survey of the Wabasso
Scrub property finds that there is sufficient habitat to accommodate the relocation without adversely
affecting the existing gopher tortoise population.
Staff's initial reaction to the request was that the County should not give away mitigation value of public
land to private developers without gaining some public benefit in return. However, the County does not
currently have a gopher tortoise survey of the Wabasso Scrub property. The County is obligated under an
FCT Grant Award Agreement to survey fauna on the property, including gopher tortoises. By granting
permission for the Wabasso Scrub to be the recipient site, the County will gain free survey information
that would otherwise have to be obtained via payment to a private contractor. In that respect, the County
is getting something in return for allowing the relocation. The number of gopher tortoises allowed to be
relocated to the Wabasso Scrub property will depend on the survey results, whereby the FWC will allow
a population of no more than two tortoises per acre.
Another consideration is that, under FWC requirements, a developer may opt to pay a fee -in -lieu of
tortoise relocation, which could result in the direct loss of tortoises on the development site. Therefore,
by allowing the relocation to take place, the County is furthering its objectives to contribute to the
preservation of rare species, in the public interest.
SEPTEMBER 7. 1999
84
•
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant the requested permission to relocate up
to 24 gopher tortoises to the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area, provided the requestor provides the
parameters and results of a gopher tortoise survey to the County free of charge, and provided the survey
results indicate that the Wabasso Scrub habitat has the capacity to accommodate the relocation,
according to FWC's standard of no more than two tortoises per acre.
Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement Chief Roland M. DeBlois reviewed the
memorandum using an aerial view to enhance his presentation and show the area to which
the gopher tortoises would be relocated.
Vice Chairman Adams was concerned that relocation of gopher tortoises might infect
a new population with the disease, fibro papilloma, and Mr. DeBlois responded that was the
reason for trying to relocate the gopher tortoises in the near proximity.
In response to Commissioner Stanbridge's concern about mitigation for gopher
tortoises for future Countyprojects, Mr. DeBlois agreed it was an issue, however, the County
will be losing only a little reserved mitigation. He expected that most of the scrub issues that
the County will experience in its future developments will diminish because most of the
scrub remaining is either publicly owned or on public land. Mr. DeBlois stated the developer
is preparing to do the survey of one-third of the Wabasso scrub property. He recommended
that even though that would be the area they would be using for relocation, the Commission
could specify that the survey be done of the whole area as a trade-off. He felt the relocated
tortoises would not remember they are obligated to stay on a third of the property, and
believed the developer would be willing to survey the whole property.
Commissioner Stanbridge felt the entire area should be surveyed and Vice Chairman
Adams agreed.
Commissioner Tippin commented he was an "expert" on gopher tortoises since his
daughters and their friends have been bringing the species to his property and he believed
his property was supporting more than two gopher tortoises per acre. One of the tortoises
is named `Rondo", which was treated by a veterinarian after an encounter with a car.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) granted permission to Weston Real
Estate Investment Group Corp. to relocate up to 24 gopher
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
85
BOOK I JL,, i=U F_ �� '�
tortoises to the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area, provided
they provide the parameters and results of a gopher tortoise
survey of the entire Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area to the
County free -of -charge, and provided the survey results indicate
thatthe Wabasso Scrub habitat has the capacity to accommodate
the relocation, according to the standards of the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission of no more than two
tortoises per acre, as recommended in the Memorandum and
amended by the Board.
11.AA POLICYESTABLISHED(GRANDFATHERING) FORNON-
CONFORMING POT-BELLIED PIGS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP HEAD CONCURRENCE:
I " /
Robert 9. Keatin , AICP
Community Developmentector/
FROM: Roland M. DeBlo>s,,*'AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: August 31, 1999
SUBJECT: Request for Board approval of policy regarding non -conforming
Pot-bellied pigs in residential areas
It is requested that the data herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at its regular meeting of September 7, 1999.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On April 6, 1999, staff advised the Board of County Commissioners of the County Code Enforcement
Board's unwillingness to enforce the prohibition of keeping pot-bellied pigs in residential areas, in cases
where pigs were kept as pets prior to a Code amendment clarifying the prohibition (see attached
minutes). At the April 6 Board meeting, the Board instructed staff to hold a public workshop to
determine if some "middle -ground" could be reached, short of the County Commission pursuing a
remedy in court to require the Code Enforcement Board to enforce the pig prohibition.
On June 3, 1999, staff held a public workshop and received input from pot-bellied pig owners and from
neighbors of pig owners concerned about public nuisance (see attached workshop minutes). Staff is now
reporting to the Board on the outcome of the workshop, and is requesting that the Board consider
establishing a policy to allow "grandfathering",of pet pigs that existed at residences prior to the Code
clarification (of May 1998), but with conditions to minimize public nuisance.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
•
ANALYSIS
At the June 3 workshop there was a consensus that, in the interest of equity and fairness, a pet pig that
existed in a residential area prior to the Code clarification should be allowed to stay for the duration of
the pig's lifetime (12 to 20 years). However, that allowance should be conditioned upon the pig's owner
taking specific actions to minimize nuisance impacts to neighbors.
Attendees of the workshop considered the following issues:
• Size of the pig (e.g., no larger than 150 lbs.)
• Location of the pig (e.g., indoors, outdoors, duration outdoors, setback from property lines)
• Visual buffers from neighbors (fences, vegetation)
• Sanitary control (concerns of potential odor, flies)
Regarding pig size, the consensus at the workshop was that it would be unfair and potentially inhumane
to make pig size a condition of whether it could stay. The concern was that there was no size limit prior
to the Code clarification, and a weight limit might promote a severe diet or starving of a pig to meet a
weight limit, which would be inhumane.
Regarding location of where a pig is kept, the consensus was that pigs should be restrained or fenced
such that they could not root or roam along neighbor property lines. Also, there should be visual buffers
(e.g., privacy fences and/ or heavy vegetation) for the neighbors' sake. There was also discussion that, on
lots smaller than %z acre, there would be a particular need for six-foot privacy fencing, whereas such
fencing may not be necessary on lots % acre or larger.
On the issue of sanitary control, there were different opinions expressed on whether there is a sanitation
concern beyond what is normally associated with other pets such as dogs. The conclusion was to
recommend that a landowner be required to keep sanitary conditions to alleviate potential odor and/or
flies.
It was also the consensus that any pigs grandfathered and allowed to stay should be registered with
Animal Control, sterilized, and vaccinated. Moreover, it was suggested that a microchip could be
implanted under the pig's skin by Animal Control, which would allow tracking of the pig to ensure it is
not replaced or move to another location in violation of the grandfathering clause.
RECOAE%IENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners establish a policy to allow pet pigs in
residential areas in cases where the pigs were kept as pets prior to May 1998, but only under the
following conditions:
1. The pet pig owner must provide evidence that the pet pig was kept at a subject residence prior to
May 1998.
2. The pet pig must be registered with Animal Control, sterilized, and vaccinated on a current basis.
Moreover, the pig owner must pay to have a microchip installed on the pig for Animal Control
tracking/record keeping purposes.
3. The area where the pet pig is allowed to roam outdoors must be cordoned off to prevent the pig from
accessing within ten feet of a property line.
4. The outdoor location where the pig is allowed to roam must be completely screened from
neighboring property by a fence and /or vegetation. On lots less than %z acre in size, a six-foot
privacy is required for screening.
5. The outdoor location where the pig is allowed to roam must be kept sanitary to alleviate potential
odors and infestation of flies.
ATTACHED
1. Minutes excerpt of the April 6, 1999 BCC meeting
2. (Unapproved) minutes of the June 3, 1999 pig workshop.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
87
•
Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement Chief Roland M. DeBlois reviewed the
memorandum and explained the issues. He also reported on the workshop held with
interested parties concerning the issues and summarized the resulting recommendations
which would become a policy if approved by the Board.
Heidi Lewis, 656 26' Avenue, gave an historical account of how she acquired her two
pet pot-bellied pigs. She spoke of new hedges, findings of the Health Department after they
examined her property as the result of a complaint, and compared her pigs to dogs and
dolphins. She was anxious to have her pets back at her home. She had no problem with
providing a 6 -foot perimeter fence within her existing fence.
Michael Cooper lives at 666 26' Avenue, which is adjacent to Ms. Lewis' property.
He was unhappy with the recommendations citing smell and flies and questioned why the
matter was back before the Commission when that body had established the ordinance
prohibiting potbellied pigs in a residential neighborhood.
County Attorney Vitunac explained that the County Attorney's office represents both
the Board and the Code Enforcement Board and in the event of a lawsuit, they would be
suing each other. The compromise solution was effected by having all the people sit down
and see if there was a way to establish reasonable regulations so the people could keep the
potbellied pigs until they die or move away. No new pigs can come in. The purpose of this
agenda item was to see if the five conditions will solve the problem. If there is still a
problem with pollution, flies, and smell, the conditions would be violated and the Code
Enforcement Board will take action against the property. The grandfather issue would no
longer be argued; public health and decency would be the issues.
On Mr. Cooper's request, Mr. DeBlois explained two specific conditions regarding
fencing as they would apply to Ms. Lewis' property.
Vice Chairman Adams was unsure that these conditions would be the solution. She
was raised on a farm and had raised pigs and has had potbellied pigs. The pet issue puts it
in a whole different perspective. She was concerned that pet goats and miniature horses
might end up being part of the issue and looked to the County Attorney for assurances.
County Attorney Vitunac recounted how this problem came about. It is thought that
this is a unique event and the regulations will solve it and the issue will go away over time.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) established a policy to allow pet
potbellied pigs in residential areas in cases where the pigs were
kept as pets prior to May 1998, under the five conditions set
forth in the memorandum, as recommended by staff.
11.B.1. PRESENTATION OF LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY
AND AUTHORIZATION FOR SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR FINAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW -
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL -
CONTINENTAL SHELF ASSOCIATES, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 1999:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Emergency Services
DATE: August 26, 1999
SUBJECT: Presentation of the Indian River County Local Mitigation Strategy and Authorization
for Submission to the Department of Community Affairs for Final Compliance
Review
On May 19,1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Contractual Services Agreement
between the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and Indian River County wherein the
County would develop a Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS). Funding in the amount of $105,000 was
made available to the County and all municipalities to complete a single, unified LMS and to assist
in completion of planning and vulnerability assessment activities with the goal of breaking the costly
cycle of recovery and rebuilding after a disaster occurs.
The DCA determined the total amount to be allocated and how the funds would be divided among
the municipalities in the County. The DCA advised that all funding amounts were individually
calculated based on vulnerability of each city and county in terms of repetitive loss, -population, risk
and mutual aid participation. The funding allocated by DCA was as follows:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
89
Fr_
BOOK 110 rn'E
Fellsmere
$ 7,500*
Indian River Shores
$15,000*
Orchid
$ 2,500*
Sebastian
$15,000*
Vero Beach
$15,000*
Unincorporated
$50,000
$105,000
5.500 (*10% Coordination Fee for the County)
Total Award
$110,500
Subsequent to approval of the above referenced contract, the County entered into sub -contracts with
each of the five municipalities. An organizational meeting was held, with representatives from all
municipalities, County departments, public utilities, private and non-profit agencies, and state
agencies in attendance. The DCA gave a presentation at the meeting on the Scope ofWork required
and the purpose of developing a LMS. The Working Group voted to seek the services of a
consultant and it was decided that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council was the most
appropriate entity to provide this service and subsequent to negotiations, a contract was approved
by the Board of County Commissioners with the TCRPC in the amount of $83,087 to assist the
Group in development of a Local Mitigation Strategy.
The Working Group decided that a better LMS plan could be developed if the funding allocations
were pooled. Staff was able to negotiate a contract at $27,413 less than the available grant funds
with the goal of using the balance of the pooled funds for another purpose to be determined later.
Since May 20, 1998, the Working Group has held monthly meetings and staff has spent a copious
amount of time assisting the TCRPC and its consultant, Continental Shelf Associates, Inc., in the
process of preparing the LMS. It is fair to say that this project was much greater in scope than
originally envisioned.
In the event of a disaster, local governments who have completed LMS planning activities will be
ahead of the game. They will have the chance to initiate changes in their communities that can
permanently reduce the risk of future losses, an opportunity that is often lost in the rush to rebuild
after a disaster. By having an LMS, our county and municipalities will be in a better position to
obtain any mitigation fiords that might become available in post -disaster situations. By identifying
and prioritizing projects before a disaster occurs, our county WILL already have gathered the kind
of information that is typically required on applications for post -disaster funding which will reduce
the time generally required to complete the application documents. The LMS will also help our
county identify mitigation opportunities and seek funding from various sources before a disaster hits
so that the impact on our communities will be lessened
The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council is prepared to present the LMS to the Board for
consideration and authorization to submit it to the Department of Community Affairs for Final
Compliance Review. After comments are received from DCA, staff will present the final LMS to
the Board for adoption by resolution.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommends the Board review the Local Mitigation Strategy and authorize its submittal to the
Department of Community Affairs for Final Compliance Review. After the DCA review is
completed, the LMS will be presented to the Board for adoption and implementation.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. LMS 1999 Prioritized Mitigation Projects List
2. LMS Working Group Membership List
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
.c
0 0
Emergency Services Director Doug Wright introduced the presenter of the Local
Mitigation Strategy.
Linc Walther, of Continental Shelf Associates, Inc., the consultant for the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council, made his presentation using the following displayed on
the ELMO.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
What Drives
Hazard Mitigation?
�., �i�.....r l:G � ',L' ��(/."J"l.l'� ,� iii V'; ✓,? i ;��!��!
07 -,-
Proposed Amendments
to the Stafford fiord Act
*Cost Shwe for *cost Share for
Prewts Affifiqatbn projeeft
in Cornmua b ies **horst in communlies with
anA&n*W.UNS; anA 0Pw'.UV's
91
BOOS Phu
F,
Why Participate
in the LMS Process?
Elements in Developing
A local Hazard Mitigation Strategy
u Pwview Feng Frawwwwk md
at % n Iro.. .
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
BOOK FAGUE -
LMS Planning Process
UNIRM
HAZARDS
PREPARE 00"
AOBJEamres
■aaroR
0aRErPMAl10N
"AEE UNTO R
WRO01YEN70PRONE
RT
INSMMONAL
:•RRxNaa�aPdr�e/mod� laaped
NVIROHKOff
E -ENS
rYi
OOCUU
Roa
.a=
RAN
.. PROJE018CAPWAL
WOMMOM
..L: PAo+eale :d... w � j"' �::�c. -
• VI= R�a�
' Gsi r.
• oma.
92
0
L-
Continued...
Offm Agencies
Orkin Wen, Fire hmpector
Marguerites Engel, biter4oververantal
-Public Safety
Coordinator
S lohn. River Water Mrnt. District
City of Sebastian
ChW Randy Wifte
Andy Fe -W Reg -W ManaW
-Sebas6an Police Department
43ebouth TWecommunkations, Im
T~ Of Orchid
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 .7 0
it
0
0
0
0 0
'-TremumcomstBumeiBuilder A—dal,oW.
MarkSa�ASSLI'
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0
-mm— 0 Olt
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0
-m� 1 OO 0 1 0 1 OO
0 1 0 1 0
1 0 i
0
i
0 0 1 0 1 0
1 00 0 1 0
1 0
0
11
I 1 0.1 0 1 0 1 0 lO
1 0 1 U
1 0
0
1
m
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
0
Lms Working Group
Indian Wer Counw
Do" WrIS19. Dbedor - UM Chaknm
cepa rt—rit of Emergency Services
Stan BoRA96 Dbectur
Iona A. Davis, Under gmfff
Nothm MWo&m Emergency
MqmL Coardinator
0Emergency ma"Isomme Dkis&m
Est" Rymer, Director
4wwbv WNNM
)v
bXfi= NVOr
Offm Agencies
Orkin Wen, Fire hmpector
Marguerites Engel, biter4oververantal
-Public Safety
Coordinator
S lohn. River Water Mrnt. District
City of Sebastian
ChW Randy Wifte
Andy Fe -W Reg -W ManaW
-Sebas6an Police Department
43ebouth TWecommunkations, Im
T~ Of Orchid
Low ZarA, EOC CbmAnator
&Wde Pakmravi Town Ma ager
-Florida Power U#*
City afVero Beach
'-TremumcomstBumeiBuilder A—dal,oW.
MarkSa�ASSLI'
6&
6 0 0 K
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
94
Indian River County
Local Mitigation Strategy
1999 Prioritized Mitigation Projects
PROJECT
AVERAGE
FWAL
SCORE
1.
Improvements to drainage facility for Carter Hall Subdivision (City
70.0
of Fellsmere) for flood damage reduction.
2.
Improved mapping of the Coastal High Hazard Area to allow for
65.4
better and more precise implementation of county regulations related
for the development within that area.
-
3.
Acquisition of land along the Indian River Lagoon within the Coastal
64.8
High Hazard area to reduce potential future losses.
4.
Re -vegetating areas along the banks of the Indian River Lagoon to
63.8
offer protection from hurricanes, floods and erosion.
5.
Retrofits to the City of vera Beach Transminion and Distribution (a
63.4
secondary critical facility) to reduce vulnerability to wind and flood
damage.
6.
Retrofits to the City of Vero Beach Recreation Facility (a secondary
63.2
critical facility) to reduce vulnerability to wind and flood damage.
7.
Retrofits to the Town of Indian River Shores (a critical facility) to
62.8
reduce vulnerability to wind and flood damage.
8.
Retrofits to the City of Vero Beach Police Department (a critical
62.4
facility) to reduce vulnerability to wind and flood damage.
9.
Mapping and assessment of public wellfields and reverse osmosis
61.2
plant protection zones to guard against groundwater contamination.
10.
Prescribed burns in certain conservation areas vulnerable to wildfire.
59.6
11.
Protection of the Surficial Aquifer groundwater quality and quantity
57.4
as a secondary Mable water source through acquisition of primary
recharge areas and through the plugging of abandoned artesian
wells.
12.
Retrofits to th City of Fellsm library for flood damage
56.6
reduction.
13.*
Retrofitting of an existing structure (old school) to provide for an
56.2
EOC and emergency shelter in the City of Fellsmere.
14.*
Establishment of a public education program on the importance of
56.2
maintaining drainage systems.
15.
Stabilization of Jungle Trail along the Indian River Lagoon to
S5.8
improve public access.
16.
Restoration of critically eroded areas along an 8.3 mile stretch of the
54.6
Atlantic shoreline in an effort to provide needed storm protection.
17.
Retrofits to the county's north library to reduce vulnerability to wind
54.0
and flood damage.
18.
Retrofits to the county's main library to reduce vulnerability to wind
52.8
and flood damage.
19.
Retrofits to the county's public schools, which serve as public
52.6
shelters, to reduce vulnerability to wind and flood damage; thereby
reducing the county's safe shelter deficit.
20.
Purchase of an emergency generator for the Town of Indian River
48.0
Shores (a critical facility).
21.
Establishment of a county GIS Department to improve flood
47.2
mapping for flood damage reduction.
22.
Modifications to the outfall structure at Stonebridge Subdivision for
45.6
flood damage reduction.
23.
Construction of a new county EOC (a critical facility) to meet
44.6
FEMA high wind standards for continuity of government.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
94
* The established tie break methodology was utilized to prioritize these two projects. The
priority was determined by obtaining the highest average Community Benefit score. The
scores were as follows: Project #13 = 28.8, Project 1114 = 26.0.
Commissioner Stanbridge pointed out that in the matrix above, Unincorporated
Hutchinson Island, should read Unincorporated Orchid Island. Also, #12 on the list of
mitigation projects, should read the "Marian Fell" Library.
Concerning #3, Chairman Macht questioned whether or not our land acquisition
obligation has advanced us to the 95 percentile, and Mr. Walther stated that was very
definitely a mitigation strategy. He pointed out that people do not realize that land
acquisitions not only protect sensitive land but also, especially along the coastline, mitigation
is achieved as well.
Chairman Macht asked whether the funding sources were probabilities, possibilities,
or what, and Mr. Walther thought they were definitely probabilities and certainly something
to continue to pursue.
Emergency Services Director Doug Wright explained that the next agenda item,
should it be approved, will cover fiuther pursuit of funding two of the top projects.
Vice Chairman Adams was curious as to how the projects were determined and was
concerned no oceanfront land acquisitions are mentioned, and Mr. Walther explained the
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
A�
BOOK
Indian River County
local Mitigation Strategy
1999 Prioritized Mitigation Projects
PROJECT
RAGE
NAL
ESC
ORE
24.
Improvements to CR 512 for improved traffic access and emergency1::4:2:.-2
evacuations.
25.
Purchase of shelter supplies for the City of Vero Beach Recreation
41.2
Facility (a secondary critical facility).
26.
Improvements to 53rd Street (East-West connector) for improved
41.0
traffic access and emergency evacuations.
27.
Replacement of county bridges constructed below the 100 -year flood
40.4
plain for improved access, evacuation and exposure to flooding.
28.
Elevation of grade crossing over RR at 41st Street for improved
38.0
traffic ams and emergency evacuations.
29.
Alterations to an existing critical facility, located in Indian River
37.6
Shores, for protection of computer equipment, important documents
and other property.
30.
Establishment of an Oslo Road/1-95 interchange for improved traffic
37.2
access and emergency evacuations.
31.
Modifications to current building standards for manufactured home
36.0
parks to provide adequate category 3/4 wind storm safe space for
their residents.
* The established tie break methodology was utilized to prioritize these two projects. The
priority was determined by obtaining the highest average Community Benefit score. The
scores were as follows: Project #13 = 28.8, Project 1114 = 26.0.
Commissioner Stanbridge pointed out that in the matrix above, Unincorporated
Hutchinson Island, should read Unincorporated Orchid Island. Also, #12 on the list of
mitigation projects, should read the "Marian Fell" Library.
Concerning #3, Chairman Macht questioned whether or not our land acquisition
obligation has advanced us to the 95 percentile, and Mr. Walther stated that was very
definitely a mitigation strategy. He pointed out that people do not realize that land
acquisitions not only protect sensitive land but also, especially along the coastline, mitigation
is achieved as well.
Chairman Macht asked whether the funding sources were probabilities, possibilities,
or what, and Mr. Walther thought they were definitely probabilities and certainly something
to continue to pursue.
Emergency Services Director Doug Wright explained that the next agenda item,
should it be approved, will cover fiuther pursuit of funding two of the top projects.
Vice Chairman Adams was curious as to how the projects were determined and was
concerned no oceanfront land acquisitions are mentioned, and Mr. Walther explained the
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
A�
BOOK
r
BOOS.
projects were generated through the working group and the list would grow and be updated
every year.
Mr. Walther explained the importance of having projects on the list in the eyes of the
Department of Community Affairs and other state governmental departments.
Chairman Macht inquired what types of mitigation are envisioned for the libraries,
and Mr. Walther advised that shutters will be sought for the schools and libraries for
hurricane protection. Mr. Walther suggested that hazard mitigation should always be
included in the bidding process for any new construction.
Commissioner Stanbridge suggested that some of the projects could be combined,
particularly under GIS. Sheagreed that hazard mitigation should always be included and
pointed out that there are historic preservation funds that could be used in retrofitting historic
buildings.
Mr. Walther agreed that adding hazard mitigation elements to other grant applications
would marginalize the applications. The ranking methodology had been developed and he
wanted the Commissioners to have a look at it. He knew this was a good start for a good
future program.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Stanbridge, to approve staff's
recommendation.
Under discussion, Chairman Macht inquired which department would be the lead
department, and Administrator Chandler replied it would be the Emergency Services
Department at this point.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carred unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Ginn absent).
(Submittal of the Local Mitigation Strategy to the Department
of Community Affairs for Final Compliance Review
authorized.)
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
0 1*
11.B.2. CONTRACT MODIFICATION #2 TO AGREEMENTS WITH
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL,
FELLSMERE, ORCHID, INDIAN RIVER SHORES, SEBASTIAN, AND
VERO BEACH CONCERNING COMPLETION OF SINGLE, UNIFIED
COUNTYWIDE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 23, 1999:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Services
DATE: August 23, 1999
SUBJECT: Contract Modification #2 to an Inter -Local Agreement between Indian River County and the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) to Complete a Single, Unified County -wide Local
Mitigation Strategy (originally approved by the BCC on 7/14/98).
Contract Modification #2 to a Municipality Subcontract Participant in the Development of a Local
Mitigation Strategy for Indian River County forthe followingmunicipalities: City ofFelismere, Town
of Orchid, Town of Indian River Shores, City of Sebastian and the City of Vero Beach (originally
approved by the BCC on 7/22/98).
The original contract with the TCRPC provided for the development of Indian River County's Local Mitigation Strategy
(LMS) for an amount of $83,087. The agreement entered into with the Department of Community Affairs (5/19/98)
provided for a fixed fee amount of up to $110,500 to develop that strategy. The resulting balance is $27,413. In an
effort to enhance Indian River County's mitigation efforts, the LMS Working Group elected to utilize the balance of
funds to achieve that goal. A proposal was requested of the TCRPC at the July 16 meeting and a document entitled
Additional LMS Planning Services Proposal for Indian River County was presented to the LMS Working Group at the
August 18, 1999 meeting. A motion was made to approve the additional services and was passed unanimously.
If approved by the Board, the additional services provided by the consultant will enhance Indian River County's LMS
by implementing the projects and goals developed in the LMS. The services will include continuation of committee
meetings, grant assistance to seek fiords for projects previously identified by the Working Group in the Project
Prioritization List, generating more interest within the private sector community and exploration of the development of
a county -wide hazard mitigation retrofit program in Indian River County.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group and staff recommends approval of Contract Modification #2 in the
amount of $27,413, the remaining grant funds, which amends the Scope of Work to provide for additional LMS
Planning services to enhance Indian River County's Local Mitigation Strategy.
ATTACHMENTS:
Three original copies of Modification #2 to Inter -Local Agreement with the TCRPC.
Three original copies of Modification #2 for each Subcontract Participant (City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, Town
of Indian River Shores, City of Sebastian and the City of Vero Beach).
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
UN
EOL . A
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved Contract Modification #2
in the amount of $27,413, the remaining grant funds, which
amends the Scope of Work to provide for additional LMS
planning services to enhance Indian River County's Local
Mitigation Strategy, as recommended in the memorandum.
COPIES OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED CONTRACTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
H.C. SALE OF SURPLUS LOTS IN FELLSMERE APPROVED -
LOTS 11 & 12, BLOCK 80, TOWN OF FELLSMERE - JAMES
GODFREY (tabled 8/17/99)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 1999:
Date: August 11, 1999
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director cJ•
Subject: Surplus Lots - Fellsmere
BACKGROUND:
Currently, the County owns two lots in Fellsmere. The legal descriptions of the properties are Lots 11 &
12, Block 80 Town of Fellsmere. The County obtained these lots in 1972, due to delinquent taxes. Each
lot is 25 feet by 125 feet.
Mr. James Godfrey along with his son is an adjacent owner. He inquired into the possibility of acquiring
the lots. As a result, I reviewed the matter with the County Attorney's office relative to options should the
Board desire to liquidate the lots. Will Collins issued a memorandum outlining those basic options. The
County could opt to sell the property by offering them to the highest and best bidder following a prescribed
notice. A second method the County could choose would be to effect a private sale when the property is
valued at $5,000 or less. This means of sale can be utilized when due to size shape and location and value
the Board determines that the parcel is of use only to one or more adjacent property owners.
Mr. Godfrey has offered $1,400 for the two lots. I subsequently advised Mr. Godfrey that I was consulting
with the County Attorney's office as how to best dispose of the lots.
ANALYSIS:
The lots are currently carried on the tax roll with a value of $2,760, which is almost twice the value offered
by Mr. Godfrey. I subsequently went to Fellsmere and drove up North Hickory Street where the lots are
located. They were occupied by debris and other items and appeared to be of minimal value to any other
Party -
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
98
Notices were sent out to all county departments to see if any usage could be made gjthe lots internally. No
department expressed any need for the lots. Community Development referenced the requirement within
the County's Affordable Housing Incentive Plan to notify various profit and non-profit organizations
involved with affordable housing projects. A check was made with the permitting authorities in the City of
Fellsmere. Fellsmere building officials advised me that the city would not issue a building permit on a
parcel only fifty feet in width. Since the two lots combined cannot receive building permits, there is no
need to circulate to the various affordable housing organizations advising of the availability of the two lots.
Due to the physical condition of the property and the inability to build on them as an individual building
site, it appears to be in the best public interest to consider authorize a private sale. The Board should sell
the lots to W. Godfrey for the $1,400 offered following the procedure as outlined by attorney Will Collins.
RECOMMENDATION:
Declare Lots 11 and 12, Block 80 Town of Fellsmere as surplus property and authorize a private sale of
such property to W. James Godfrey, provided that no more than one party desires to obtain the subject
property. If there is more than one party desiring to purchase the property, authorize staff to accept sealed
bids for the property. Authorize the Chairman to execute a quit claim deed to the property.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) declared Lots 11 and 12, Block 80
Town of Fellsmere as surplus property and authorized a private
sale of such property to Mr. James Godfrey, provided that no
more than one party desires to obtain the subject property, and
authorized the Chairman to execute a quit claim deed to the
property. If there is more than one party desiring to purchase
the property, staff is authorized to accept sealed bids for the
property.
COPY OF QUIT CLAIM DEED wII.L BE FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.G.1. KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE II - 4TH STREET TO OSLO
ROAD - AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
SERVICES CONTRACT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES
INC. -
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
BOOS : ' ''"
r,
b0UK FA-ut e]' u�
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Directo
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.
-Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 9 to Professional Engineering Services
Kings Highway Improvements - Oslo Road to 2e Street
DATE: August 31, 1999
I�Z�. Y•�. ��� •i� t•
Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc. is under contract with Indian River County to perform
professional services for improvements to Kings Highway.
The attached Amendment No. 9 provides for expanding design services for King's
Highway Phase II. The segment of Kings Highway from 0 Street to Oslo Road was
originally planned as a 2 -lane roadway and the segment from 0 Street to 16°i Street was
planned as a 4 -lane divided roadway. Due to the increase in development, higher traffic
counts and to simplify the phasing of construction, staff is recommending that the section
of Kings Highway from 0 Street to Oslo Road be designed as a 4 -lane divided roadway
in lieu of a 2 -lane roadway.
Phase II design plans have not been finalized because right-of-way is still being acquired.
The modified design will incorporate revisions to the typical sections, plan and profile
sheets, signing and marking sheets, cross sections, and signalization plan for the 5e
Avenue and Oslo Road intersection.
The compensation due the Engineer for Amendment No. 9 is $30,800.00. This increases
the total compensation for Roadway Design for Phase I and Phase II of Kings Highway
from $633,358.00 to $664,158.00.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 9 in the amount of $30,800.00. Funding
is from Account #109-214-541-067.31 and 101-158-541-067.31.
ATTACHMENT
Amendment No. 9
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved Amendment No. 9 in the
amount of $30,800 expanding the design services for King's
Highway Phase II, as recommended in the memorandum.
AMENDMENT NO.9 IS ON FILE
IN TBE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
iso
11.G.2. REPLACEMENT OF BOAT LAUNCHING FACILITIES -
MAIN STREET IN SEBASTIAN - SINGLE SOURCE CONTRACTOR
APPROVAL - TEDDER BOAT RAMP SYSTEM
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 30, 1999:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
Terry B. Thompson, P.
Capital Projects Manage
FROM: James E. "Chip" Boyette
Project Engineer Engineering 9L.rcian
SUBJECT: Single Source Vendor
Replacement of Boat Launching Facilities at
Main Street in Sebastian
DATE: August 30, 1999
The Capital Projects Division of Public Works is asking for Board approval for a single source
vendor/contractor to replace boat launching facilities at Main Street in Sebastian. The existing
facilities have broken concrete, the ramp is too short, and in general disrepair.
The Tedder Boat Ramp System is a unique system that requires no dewatering, lowering the cost of
the project. The launching facility is in place in 7 - 10 work days, being less of an inconvenience to
the public. This product has a national copyright and trademark issued by the U. S. Patent Office.
Randall G. Tedder Construction, Inc. has been used as a single source vendor by Department of
Environmental Protection and Indian River County.
This project is a cooperative effort with the City of Sebastian, it's estimated total cost is $74,900.00.
The County has a grant from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (F.D.E.P.) Special
Waterway Projects in the amount of $80,000.00. To date $45,755.00 has been spent on Donald
MacDonald Park. The grant has been amended to include the Main Street location rather than return
the unexpended balance to the F.D.E.P.. Capital Projects intends to do the approach slab portion of
the project, costing $30,000.00. By the County contributing to this project the grant funds stay
within the County.
Staff recommends that the Board approve the Single Source Contractor. The grant requires no
matching funds.
Proposal for Boat Launching Facilities
Purchase Order from F.D.E.P. to Randall G. Tedder Construction, Inc. for Single Source Vendor
Letters of Recommendations from other Counties
Grant Amendment from F.D.E.P.
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
101
8WUn
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved the Single Source
contractor, Randall G. Tedder Construction, Inc., as
recommended in the memorandum.
a F'AGE
n `0 72-` `
11.H.1. SMITH WAREHOUSE FORCE MAIN AND WATER MAIN
CONSTRUCTION - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITH JERRY
SMITH
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 30, 1999:
DATE: AUGUST 30,1999
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADNW41STRATOR
FROM: DONALD R HUBBS, E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S
PREPARED STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E.
AND STAFFED CAPrrAL PROJECTS ANAG
BY:
SUBJECT. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT FOR SMITH WAREHOUSE
FORCE MAIN & WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION
BACKGROUND
Smith Warehouse is a proposed 6,000 square foot commercial development located at the northwest comer of
Second Street and Haigh Street, just south of CR -512. A 6 -inch force main and an 84nch waterline is planned
along High Street to serve current establishments and future developments south of Second Stra t. The force
main shall be constructed along the east side of High Street and the water line on the west. The property
owner, Jerry Smith, has agreed to enter into a cost sharing agreement with the County to construct the proposed
force main and water line in conjunction with their site development
Attached is a proposed developer's agreement with Jerry Smith for reimbursement of a portion of the subject
force main and water line.
ANALYSIS
As shown m Exhibit B of the attached Agreement, the estimated cost sharing between the Developer and the
Country is as follows:
Description
.. --- �^- •� — — ut , W—r-
Water Diift button System
Wastewater Collection System
Total
Developer's Share(*)
$1,462.50
$4,988.00
$6,450.50
County's Share
$16,250.50
$12,847.00
$29,097.50
Total Cost
$17,713.00
$17,835.00
$35,548.00
+
_ _
� wacmon charges at a minimum of 61125/k for water and $15.77/ft. for sewer
pursuant to ResoMon 99-58.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
102
The Developer will pay $8,972.00jn addition to the above Developer's share, in water and sewer capacity
charges and connection fees. Construction of the water main and force main will allow the County to
coordinate expansion of the water distribution and wastewater collection system with development of the site
and adjacent properties. The County's share will be fimded from capacity charges fee fiord. '
RECOMIVIENDATTON
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
the attached Developer's agreement as presented, and authorizes the Chairman to execute the same.
ACCOUNT NO: 4724X)0-169-370.00 NAME. Utility Capacity Charge Fund AMOUNT: $29,097.50
sd
Attachments
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Grin absent) approved the proposed developer's
agreement with Jerry Smith for Smith Warehouse as presented
and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as recommended
in the Memorandum.
DEVELOPER'S AGREIIVIENT IS ON=
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.2. RESOLUTION NOS. 99-089 AND 99-090 - FLORAVON
SHORES SUBDIVISION PETITION WATER SERVICE - 110TH
PLACE (RE—SOLUTIONS I & ED
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 20, 1999:
DATE: AUGUST 20,1999
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADNIINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E.
ROS
DIRECTOR OF UTII.ITY S
PREPARED
JAMES D.CHAST
AND STAFFED
- MANAGER OF PROJECTS
BY:
DEPARTMENT OF UTIIrITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION
PETITION WATER SERVICE —110M PLACE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -99 -03 -DS
RESOLUTIONS I AND II
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
103
COUP �� A' -
f`
BACKGROUND
On May 11, 1999, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners unanimously
authorized staff to proceed with the design engineering necessary, in order to proceed with the
above project. Design has been completed by the Department of Utility Services staff. We are now
ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project (See attached agenda item and
minutes of the above -referenced meeting). _
ANALYSIS
Of the 13 homes on 110' Place (one under construction), 11 homeowners have signed the petition
(85% of the homes), for County water due to substandard quality of their well water. One owner
not signing the petition owns five vacant lots. Although the owners signing represents 52% of the
21 lots, (eight lots being vacant), staff believes, due to the high percentage of homeowners in favor,
that the project should move forward at this time.
The typical lot sizes in this subdivision are 0.30 acre to 0.33 acre, with 3 lots greater, these being
0.37 to 0.42 acre, all of lots being "undersized" as defined in the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan. According to the Environmental Health Department for Indian River County,
this subdivision does not meet today's standards for construction with wells and septic tanks. This
limits the size of homes that may be constructed. Since construction is subject to site placement of
wells and septic tanks on neighboring lots, some of the 8 vacant lots could be determined
"unbuildable." Installation of a water system can help to reduce such a risk for future home
construction.
Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan states, "The County's water system shall be expanded
to supply the potable water needs of the eastern half of the County during the period 1986 — 2005. -
(Attached
(Attached is page 4 of the Potable Water Sub -element, and page 22 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -
element). The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project. This project
is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water line route. In the
interim, funding will be from the Assessment Fund No. 473 —000-169-372.00.
In cooperation with the Public Works Department, staff has obtained a right-of-way record drawing
which has been utilized for design of this project. Although some minor survey work will still be
required, this may assist in reducing project design costs. Design services will be provided by the
Department of Utility Services.
Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project The total estimated project cost and
amount to be assessed, including engineering and administration is $43,531.60. The attached cost
per square foot is $0.15466.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached resolutions, which approve the preliminary assessment roll
and establish the public hearing date.
JDC/b
Attachments
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
104
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) adopted Resolution 99-089
providing for the Floravon Shores Subdivision water expansion
(110` Place); providing the total estimated cost, method of
payment of assessments, number of annual installments, and
legal description of the area specifically served.
Providing (First Reso.) &Wreso/liorav)Vk/DC
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 89
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
THE FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION WATER EXPANSION (Ile
PLACE); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS,
AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined
that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the
county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
properties to be serviced by a water main extension to Floravon Shores Subdivision (1101"
Place), hereinafter referred to as Project No. UW -99 -03 -DS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 21 lots on
110'" Place, and that the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $43,531.60 or $0.15466 per square foot to be
paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the
Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands
adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially
benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special
assessments.
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.15466 per square foot shall be assessed against
each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised
or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public hearing, at the
same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days
after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special
assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not
paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal
plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal
not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the spectral assessments shall bear interest until
paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the project is
completed.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to
be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed
improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services. _
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in
connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department
shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be
published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing
required by Section 206.04.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
105
BOOK Jj- E
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner. A d am g , and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d ae and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Absent
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 7th
day of S e p t e m b e,r•1999.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
Deputy Clerk
BOARD O COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIA COU!,FLORIDA
By - ,.z&
Kenneh R. kfacht, Chairman
tolyl fl`vt ;A Aocc�eG C:�:
fL�-gat
i,c.. !
i-it�n ht.jf.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) adopted Resolution 99-090 setting
a time and place at which the owners of properties located in the
Floravon Shores Subdivision water expansion area (110` Place)
and other interested persons, may appear before the Board of
County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and
advisability of constructing the water main extension, as to the
cost thereof as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property
benefitted thereby.
Time and Place (Second Reso.) 8/99(resoRlorav)A DC
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 90
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME
AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN
THE FLORAVON SHORES SUBDMSION WATER EXPANSION AREA
(lie PLACE) AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD
AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE
WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE
MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT
THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY
BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 99- 9 0 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of
the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 21 lots located in Floravon Shores
Subdivision (110'" Place); and
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
106
•
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect
thereto shall be $0.15466 per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be
completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of
County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County
Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County
Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, September 28, 1999, at which
time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may
appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved
and the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the
assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special
assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment
plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for
said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of
Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the
Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week
prior to the date of the hearing.
4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each
Property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice inwriting of such time and place,
his last known address.
which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the motion
was seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i dg ®nd, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Vice Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Aye
Commissioner John W. Ti pilin
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Absent
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 7th
day of Septem4g999.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Cle k
Deputy Cie
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
BOARD O COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDI VER COU LORIDA
Kenneth R. acht, Chairman
107
I
soa
Indian River County Department of Uably Services
Fbmmn Shores Subdivision 110 Tb. A(oce Wafer Main
IRCProjed No. UW -99 -03 -DS
lhaj00 -Flea.= shee. Ile m p,. Wo. M.,.
Est, -Cast:
Zi3,300
serey� sgvioee :
Hera sevey _
S23o
Sp
_
Tide seemsE==3MD=aipdm
s0
LmdfR0WAcqobffiw
S250
so
9.01%
33.117
N aS�6
Y173
B' g Awed Sstvien 0.5%
Y2 623
AdYetieaaQa
3330
FObB
POGO B
Y300
31.600
AdodasOrstma S.OX
Y1,T30
F��ARY A�ESS, E COST:
43 S3L60
Est: SQ. FT TD BE A33E4S1a •
251.357
FST COST PER SQUARE Yom:
aLi066
(ROUNDED TO SIH PLA
PREUMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMARY
110TH PLACE - FLORAVON SHORES - PETITION WATER SERVICE
AUG2,1999
110TH PL-FLORAVON 2
J. D. C.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -99 -MM
108
1.02 PM&gM
•
��[•.: •1 •�:_ sir �r •.: ;
AUG.18,1999
110TH PL-FLORAVONA
J.D.C.
FLORAVON SHORES -110TH PLACE -WATER SERVICE 8/18189
J.D.C.
PARCEL 8 0831 39 00002 WW 00001 A SQ. FT. 18,295 ASSESSMENT 2,829.50
OWNER BARNES, ANN ANGEL (TR)
6698110TH ST
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOTS 1 &2
PARCEL 9 08 3139 ODOM 0000 00003.0 SQ. FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT 2.010.58
OWNER BARNES, ANN ANGEL (TR)
8698110TH ST
SEBASTIAN, FL 32956
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PSI 4-78
LOT 3
PARCEL 8 08 3139 00002 0000 00004.0 SQ. FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT 2,010.58
OWNER CHRISTY, JAMES & LYNN MARIE
216 LONGVIEW DR
JEFFERSONVILLE, IN 47130.5838
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 4
PARCEL 0 08 3139 00002 0000 00005.0 SQ, FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT 2,010.58
OWNER MARTZ, RICHARD E. & ALMA J.
6648110TH PL
SEBASTIAN, FL 328564735
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4.78
LOT 5
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
109
SQUARE
PARCEL t. D. NO,
OWNER
FOOTAGE
ASSESSMENT
06 3139 00002 0000 00001.0
BARNES -2 LOTS
18, 5
2,829.50
08 3139 00002 0000 00003.0
BARNES-
13,000
2,010.58
08 3139 00002 0000 00004.0
CHRISTY
13,000
2,010.58
08 3139 00002 0000 00005.0
MARTZ
13,000
2,010.58
08 3139 00002 0000 00006.0
GUTHRIE
13,000
2,010.58
08 3139 00002 0000 00007.0
BURBINE
13,000
2,010.58
08 3139 00002 0000 00008.0
HOWEY
13,939
2,155.81
08 3139 00002 0000 00009.0
HOWEY
13,504
2,088.53
08 3139 00002 DOW 00010.0
COLLADA
14,375
2,223.24
08 3139 OOOOZ 0000 00011.0
BARNES
13,939
2,155.81
08 3139 00002 0000 00012.0
DOROUGH
14,375
2,22324
08 3139 00002 0000 00013.0
O'QUIST
14,375
2,223.24
08 3139 W002 0000 00014.0
GAUDET
13,939
2,155.81
08 3139 00002 0000 00015.0
JOHNSTON
13,939
2,155.81
08 3139 00002 0000 00016.0
PASSETT
13,939
2,155.81
08 3139 00002 0000 00017.0
METRO
13,504
2,088.53
08 3130 00002 0000 00018.0
HALL
18,295
2,829.50
08 3139 00002 0000 00035.0
THERIEN
15,016
2,322.37
08 3139 ODOM 00W 00035.1
THERIEN
8.916
1,378.95
08 3139 00002 0000 00038.0
BARNES
18,117
2,482.55
SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE ASSESSED
281,467
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$ 43,531.60
AND AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED
ESTIMATED COST PER SQ. FOOT
$ 0.15466
AUG.18,1999
110TH PL-FLORAVONA
J.D.C.
FLORAVON SHORES -110TH PLACE -WATER SERVICE 8/18189
J.D.C.
PARCEL 8 0831 39 00002 WW 00001 A SQ. FT. 18,295 ASSESSMENT 2,829.50
OWNER BARNES, ANN ANGEL (TR)
6698110TH ST
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOTS 1 &2
PARCEL 9 08 3139 ODOM 0000 00003.0 SQ. FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT 2.010.58
OWNER BARNES, ANN ANGEL (TR)
8698110TH ST
SEBASTIAN, FL 32956
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PSI 4-78
LOT 3
PARCEL 8 08 3139 00002 0000 00004.0 SQ. FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT 2,010.58
OWNER CHRISTY, JAMES & LYNN MARIE
216 LONGVIEW DR
JEFFERSONVILLE, IN 47130.5838
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 4
PARCEL 0 08 3139 00002 0000 00005.0 SQ, FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT 2,010.58
OWNER MARTZ, RICHARD E. & ALMA J.
6648110TH PL
SEBASTIAN, FL 328564735
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4.78
LOT 5
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
109
F,
n
U
BOCK
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00006.0 SQ. FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT010.56
OWNER GUTHRIE, H EDWIN (TR)
11160 U S HIGHWAY ONE
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958.4721
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4-78
LOT 6
PARCEL # 3139 00002 0000 00007.0 SQ. FT. 13,000 ASSESSMENT 2,010.58
OWNER BURBINE, NORMAN H. & ANNE
8872110TH PL
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4.78
LOT 7
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00035.1 SQ. FT. 8,916 ASSESSMENT 1,378.95
OWNER THERIEN, RICHARD C. & CAROL
100 99TH ST, LOT 1
SEBAST[AN. FL 329M
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 478 A PARC OF LAND LYING & BEING IN A
POR OF GOV LOTS 3 & 4, SEC 8.31-39; BEING A POR OFLOT 35 OF SAID
SUB, BEING MORE PART DESC AS FOLL: COM AT THE INTERSECTION OF
S RNV LINE OF 110TH PL W/ E RNV LINE OF US HWY# 1, SAID PT BEING
THE NW COR OF SAID LOT 35 & ALSO THE POB; TH N 85 DEG 03 MIN 27
SEC E, ALONG SAID S RNV OF 110TH PL. 108.0 FT; TH CONT ALONG SAID
S RMI LINE OF 110TH PL N 87 DEG 24 MIN 05 SEC E 10.10 FT; TH S 06 DEG
08 MIN 34 SEC E. 88.71; TH S 84 DEG W MIN 57 SEC W, 89.35 FT TO SAID E
RNV LINE OF US HWY # 1 TH N 24 DEG 00 MIN 00 SEC W ALONG SAID E
RNV LINE OF US HWY # 192.31 TO POB.
PARCEL # 08 3139 00002 0000 00038.0 SQ. FT. 16,117 ASSESSMENT 2,492.55
OWNER BARNES, ANN
5898 110TH ST
SEBASTIAN, FL 329584738
LEGAL FLORAVON SHORES SUB PBI 4.78
LOT 38
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 281,487
TOTAL ASSESSMENT 43,531.80
11.H.3. PETITION WATER SERVICE - 28TH AVENUE (NORTH OF
4TH STREET)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 19, 1999:
DATE: AUGUST 19,1999
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R HUBBS, .E. I
DIRECTOR OF UTIL
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF PROJECTS
BY: ' DEPARTMENT !O*SERVICES
SUBJECT: PETITION WATER SERVICE
TWENTY EIGHTH AVENUE (NORTH OF 47B STREET)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW 994)&DS
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
110
•
BACKGROUND
A petition has been received from the residents of 28tq Avenue, (north of 4" Street) requesting the
County to supply potable water to its residents. We are now coming to the Board of Cowry
Commissioners to seek approval to begin design of the above-mentioned project. (See attached
petition and plat map.)
ANALYSIS
There are six non -platted residential parcels which may benefit from this proposed water line on
2e Avenue. The petition has been signed by four of the owners (67%). The properties are from
.23 acre to .42 acre. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project.
Twenty eighth Avenue is a private street, and the owners will be providing the County with the
necessary utility easement.
Ibis project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water line
route. In the interim, funding will be from the assessment fiord No. 473. Design service will be
provided by the Department of Utility Services.
I ;7 xK�7�i lu � �ia7�l ti [1�►1
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the above -listed project,
and requests authorization for the Department to proceed with the design engineering work and
award a contract for survey services through the issuance of a purchase order based on the most
favorable quote, in preparation for the spec-ial assessment project.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved the petition water service
on 28' Avenue (north of 41 Street), Project No. UW -99 -06 -DS,
and authorized the Utility Services Department to proceed with
the design engineering work and award a contract for survey
services through the issuance of a purchase order based on the
most favorable quote, in preparation for the special assessment
project, as recommended in the memorandum.
B.A. CHAIRMAN MACHT -REQUEST FOR VOLUNTEERS TO
SERVE ON THE UTILITIES ADVISORY BOARD
ChairmanMacht announced a vacancy on the Utilities Advisory Board and asked that
anyone interested in serving on this board send their resume to the Board of County
Commissioners office.
13A COMIVHSSIONER STANBRIDGE - MEMBERSHIP IN
ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM (AMP)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999:
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
111
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
nor.
Board of County Commissioners
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
S
August 31, 1999
MEMBERSHIP IN ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL
ESTUARY PROGRAM (ANEP)
As a member of the Indian River Lagoon Basis Advisory Board, Indian River
County is being asked to provide $200.00 or one-fifth of the total membership
fee of $1, 000.00, as approved by the Advisory Board on April 21, 1999. The
Counties of Brevard, St. Lucie, Volusia and Martin are also being asked to
provide a one-fifth portion of this fee.
I understand we were not members last year, but I think the Association has
grown and matured enough to be able to help us with funding, lobbying, etc.
and therefore I recommend that the Board approve the attached $200.00
invoice for the Association of National Estuary Programs (ANDP) 1999
program membership dues.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Ginn absent) approved payment of $200 for 1999
membership in the Association of National Estuary Programs.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Commissioners
would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those
minutes are being prepared separately.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of the Emergency
Services District meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of
the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are being prepared separately.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
112
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 11:17 a.m.
ATTEST:
(::::) -IN r-
Jeffre anon, Clerk
Minutes approved Ojw-19
SEPTEMBER 7,1999
113
Kenneth IL Macht Chdmnan
A