The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/11/2000• MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2000 - 9:00 A.M. County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840 25`h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1) Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman (District 5) Kenneth R. Macht (District 3) Ruth M. Stanbridge (District 2) John W. Tippin (District 4) 9:00 a.m. 1. 2. 3. 4. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE • James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board Comm. Kenneth R. Macht ADDITIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ADDITIONS: None DELETION: 7.D. Local Collection of the Tourist Development Tax 5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board: 1) Delta Farms Water Control District Audit Report and Annual Local Government Financial Report for FY 1998-99 2) City of Vero Beach Ordinance 99-017 annexing a portion of Government Lot 4, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 40 East, City of Vero Beach (approx. 2 acres — Papin Anne- xation — Parcel #06-33-40-00000-0040-00001.0 —18" St.) 3) St. Johns River Water Management District Governing Board Meeting Schedule for Year 2000 BACKUP PAGES BOOK F'�1�E boa, E Y j"y 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES B. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated December 29, 1999) 1-15 C. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 004 (memorandum dated January 4, 2000) 16-19 D. Local Collection of the Tourist Development Tax (memorandum dated January 3, 2000) 20 E. Approval of BellSouth Special Service Agreement to Upgrade 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Point Telephone Devices for the Deaf (memorandum dated December 28, 1999) 21-27 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Unity Center of Vero Beach Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Construct a Place of Worship (memorandum dated January 4, 2000) 28-40 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RS -3 AND A-1 TO PD FOR APPROXIMATELY 191.64 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE SW AND 9TH STREET SW (OSLO ROAD) BETWEEN 9TH STREET SW AND THE SOUTH RELIEF CANAL; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Legislative Suntree Partners Inc.'s Request to Rezone Approxi- mately 191.54 Acres from A-1 (Agricultural) and RS -3 (Single -Family up to 3 units/acre) to PD (Planned Development) and to Receive Conceptual PD Plan Approval for a Development to be Known as Citrus Springs (memorandum dated January 4, 2000) 41-85 9. PUBLIC ITEMS kont'd.): BACKUP B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS PAGES 35`x' Avenue Residents' Petition Requesting 4 -Way STOP Signs and Speed Humps (memorandum dated January 3, 2000) 86-92 C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS None 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development None B. Emergency Services None C. General Services None D. Leisure Services None E. Office of Management and Budget None F. Personnel None G. Public Works Gifford Area Stormwater Improvements — Work Order No. 4 to the Professional Civil Services Master Agreement between Carter Associates, Inc. and Indian River County, Florida (memorandum dated January 3, 2000) 93-104 H. Utilities 1. Request for Issuance of an Easement to Florida Power and Light (FP&L) for the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) (memorandum dated January 3, 2000) 105-108 FADE 7 BOOK .. mn 100 BACKUP 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): PAGES H. Utilities (cont'd.): 2. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement Between Indian River County and River Grove Mobile Home Village (memorandum dated January 3, 2000) 109-112 I. Human Services None 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Fran B. Adams B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn C. Commissioner Kenneth R Macht D. Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge E. Commissioner John W. Tippin 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS A. Emergency Services District None BACKUP 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS (cont'd.): PAGES B. Solid Waste Disposal District 1. Approval of Minutes — Reg. Meeting of 12/7/99 2. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (memorandum dated December 28, 1999) 113-118 3. Landfill Operations Permit/Agreement (memorandum dated December 28, 1999) 119-141 C. Environmental Control Board None 15. ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast various times throughout the week Falcon Cable Channel 35 — rebroadcast Friday evening • INDEX TO MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2000 1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1 2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA - DELETION ........................ 1 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ......................... 2 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ....................................... 2 7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................ 2 7.A. Received and Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board: ......... 2 7.B. Approval of Warrants ....................................... 2 7.C. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 004 ......................... 15 7.D. Local Collection of the Tourist Development Tax ................. 18 7.E. Approval of BellSouth Special Service Agreement to Upgrade 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Point Telephone Devices for the Deaf ............ 18 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - UNITY CENTER OF VERO BEACH REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A PLACE OF WORSHIP.................................................... 19 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-001- REZONE APPROXIMATELY 191.54 ACRES FROM A-1(AGRICULTURAL) AND RS -3 (SINGLE FAMILY UP TO 3 UNITS PER ACRE) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) AND CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN APPROVAL FOR A DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWN AS CITRUS SPRINGS - SUNTREE PARTNERS, INC . .............................................. 27 1 EOGK p fAG` 9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - 35TH AVENUE RESIDENTS' PETITION REQUESTING 4 -WAY STOP SIGNS AND SPEED HUMPS ............. 53 11.G. GIFFORD AREA STORMWATER HAPROVEMENTS - WORK ORDER NO.4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL CIVIL SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT - CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC . .................................... 57 11.14.1. EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT (FP&L) FOR THE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY . 59 11.14.2. DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT - RIVER GROVE MOBILE HOME VILLAGE .......................... 60 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT .............................. 62 14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................. 62 14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ........................... 62 2 • January 11, 2000 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, January 11, 2000. Present were, Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; Ruth Stanbridge; and John W. Tippin. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. INVOCATION Commissioner Tippin delivered the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Macht led the Pledge to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA - DELETION Administrator Chandler requested that Item 7.D. be deleted; it will come back at some future date. January 11, 2000 1 • BOOK F'f1GE S) 3. BOOK ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously deleted item 7.D. from the agenda as requested. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. 7. CONSENT AGENDA 7.A. Received and Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board: 1) Delta Farms Water Control District Audit Report and Annual Local Government Financial Report for FY 1998-99 2) City of Vero Beach Ordinance 99-017 Annexing a portion of Government Lot 4, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 40 East, City of Vero Beach (approximately 2 acres - Papin Annexation - Parcel #06-33-40-00000-0040- 00001.0 - 18" Street) 3) St. Johns River Water Management District Governing Board Meeting Schedule for Year 2000. FOR INFORMATION ONLY. NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. 7.B. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 29, 1999: January 11, 2000 0 0 0 • To: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: DECEMBER 29,1999 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of December 17, 1999 to December 29, 1999. Attachment: • ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk for the period December 17-29, 1999, as requested in the Memorandum. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020315 FLORIDA COMBINED LIFE 1999-12-17 2,687.10 0020316 KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE 1999-12-21 138.50 0020317 BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1999-12-21 552.96 0020318 ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE 1999-12-21 .00 0020319 VELASQUEZ, MERIDA 1999-12-21 200.00 0020320 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 1999-12-21 163.97 0020321 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 1999-12-21 325.00 0020322 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 1999-12-21 521.88 0020323 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. 1999-12-21 2,355.00 0020324 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 1999-12-21 82,703.84 0020325 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 1999-12-21 231.03 0020326 NACO/SOUTHEAST 1999-12.21 6,696.37 0020327 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 1999-12-21 515.39 0020328 OKEECHOBEE CO., PMTS DOMES REL 1999-12-21 167.25 0020329 WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS 1999-12-21 23.08 0020330 FLSDU 1999-12-21 6,513.75 0020331 WI SCTF 1999-12-21 150.00 January 11, 2000 3 VOID BGGKEr�GLLi- CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0263915 JA% NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1999-06-10 .00 0264544 NOE, ROBERT C 1999-06-17 .00 0268891 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 1999-09-09 .00 0269706 PALMDALE OIL CO 1999-09-23 .00 0272907 NEFF MACHINERY, INC 1999-11-18 .00 0274044 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 1999-12-09 .00 0274695 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-12-23 444.00 0274696 ABC-CLIO INC 1999-12-23 526.24 0274697 ACTION PRINTERS 1999-12-23 646.37 0274698 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 1999-12-23 34.00 0274699 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION 1999-12-23 3,359.87 0274700 AMERICAN CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, 1999-12-23 690.00 0274701 AMERICAN LEGION POST 0039 1999-12-23 29.00 0274702 ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE 1999-12-23 314.00 0274703 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 1999-12-23 59.90 0274704 ART KRIEGER CONSTRUCTION 1999-12-23 12,067.20 0274705 ADAMS, FRAN B 1999-12-23 475.00 0274706 ALBERTSON'S 1999-12-23 .00 0274706 ALBERTSON'S 1999-12-23 .00 0274707 AMERICAN DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS 1999-12-23 120.00 0274708 AMERITREND HOMES 1999-12-23 1,500.00 0274709 ABC PRINTING CO 1999-12-23 14.96 0274710 ACTION A/C & HEATING INC 1999-12-23 30.00 0274711 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 1999-12-23 90.00 0274712 ALL CREATURES GREAT & SMALL 1999-12-23 13.50 0274713 ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC 1999-12-23 21.00 0274714 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 1999-12-23 5,545.25 0274715 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1999-12-23 3,068.69 0274716 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 1999-12-23 1,123.72 0274717 BARTON, JEFFREY K 1999-12-23 1,371.50 0274718 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 1999-12-23 599.71 0274719 BRODART CO 1999-12-23 806.92 0274720 BONET, JAMES RN 1999-12-23 80.00 0274721 BYRON SISTLER & ASSOCIATES 1999-12-23 36.00 0274722 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION 1999-12-23 374.46 0274723 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 1999-12-23 1,168.65 0274724 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 1999-12-23 23.58 0274725 BELLSOUTH 1999-12-23 355.67 0274726 BEAZER HOMES, INC 1999-12-23 500.00 0274727 BARTON, JEFFREY K 1999-12-23 2,254.30 0274728 BEAM, BETTY 1999-12-23 33.48 0274729 BOYES & FARINA P A 1999-12-23 3,202.30 0274730 BAKER, DONALD R 1999-12-23 300.00 0274731 BELLSOUTH 1999-12-23 1,615.57 0274732 CITRUS MOTEL 1999-12-23 126.00 0274733 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 1999-12-23 19.00 0274734 CLIMATIC HEATING & A/C 1999-12-23 2,782.00 0274735 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 1999-12-23 197.50 0274736 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 1999-12-23 7,431.26 0274737 CLARKE, DOROTHEA 1999-12-23 20.88 0274738 CONSTRUCTION LICENSING 1999-12-23 40.00 0274739 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 1999-12-23 48.45 0274740 CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL 1999-12-23 220.00 0274741 CLIFFORD, MIKE 1999-12-23 100.00 0274742 CHAMPION MANUFACTURING INC 1999-12-23 154.54 0274743 CARTER, CYNTHIA L 1999-12-23 6.00 0274744 CSR AMERICA, INC. 1999-12-23 881.50 January 11, 2000 4 VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0274745 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 1999-12-23 28.50 0274746 COSNER MFG CO 1999-12-23 501.12 0274747 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN 1999-12-23 5,126.53 0274748 CONVAULT FLORIDA, INC. 1999-12-23 11,357.35 0274749 COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT LEASING 1999-12-23 672.00 0274750 CHAPIN, LINDA W -CLERK OF COURT 1999-12-23 366.00 0274751 CLIMATIC HEATING & A/C 1999-12-23 2,240.00 0274752 DAVES SPORTING GOODS 1999-12-23 425.51 0274753 DEMCO INC 1999-12-23 451.73 0274754 DIRECTOR, KENNETH L PID PA 1999-12-23 200.00 0274755 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 1999-12-23 1,085.00 0274756 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 1999-12-23 289,98 0274757 DISABLED AMERICAN VETERAN 1999-12-23 65.00 0274758 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 1999-12-23 10,097.95 0274759 DILLON, EDWARD D 1999-12-23 300.00 0274760 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC 1999-12-23 332.25 0274761 DOANE, BOOKS DEPT 1999-12-23 30.45 0274762 EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES 1999-12-23 107.00 0274763 EDWARDS, GARRY PHD 1999-12-23 275.00 0274764 ERIF SALES COMPANY INC 1999-12-23 376.05 0274765 EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE 1999-12-23 3,056.90 0274766 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1999-12-23 76.16 0274767 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1999-12-23 36,179.61 0274768 FLORIDA TREND 1999-12-23 29.95 0274769 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC 1999-12-23 1,500.00 0274770 FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 1999-12-23 100.00 0274771 FENIMORE, CHARLES 1999-12-23 165.00 0274772 FATHER & SON CARPET CLEANING 1999-12-23 1,229.00 0274773 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-12-23 109.00 0274774 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 1999-12-23 1,175.20 0274775 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 1999-12-23 1,161.92 0274776 GALE GROUP, THE 1999-12-23 788.90 0274777 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 1999-12-23 1,023.99 0274778 GREEN, PHILLIP 1999-12-23 92.70 0274779 GLOBAL MART 1999-12-23 38.95 0274780 GRAPEVINE PUBLISHING AND 1999-12-23 13.95 0274781 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 1999-12-23 58.73 0274782 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 1999-12-23 169.08 0274783 HERITAGE BOOKS, INC 1999-12-23 217.71 0274784 HERITAGE QUEST 1999-12-23 35.90 0274785 HACH COMPANY 1999-12-23 322.65 0274786 HIGHLAND HOMES 1999-12-23 2,750.00 0274787 HILL MANUFACTURING 1999-12-23 376.27 0274788 HANSEN, SUSAN 1999-12-23 147.90 0274789 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-12-23 233,512.14 0274790 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-12-23 175.00 0274791 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 1999-12-23 478.00 0274792 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 1999-12-23 58.17 0274793 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 1999-12-23 201.94 0274794 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 1999-12-23 56.83 0274795 INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL 1999-12-23 120.00 0274796 INDIAN RIVER ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1999-12-23 45.00 0274797 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-12-23 15.00 0274798 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 1999-12-23 325.00 0274799 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1999-12-23 40.00 January 11, 2000 5 Elm, A'UE 0 January 11, 2000 C1 CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 1999-12-23 47.00 0274800 IBM CORPORATION 1999-12-23 1,322.11 0274801 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 1999-12-23 40.00 0274802 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1999-12-23 103.72 0274803 JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS 1999-12-23 185.77 0274804 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 1999-12-23 76.86 0274805 CARLSON, JOYCE M JOHNSTON 1999-12-231999-12-23 719.87 0274806 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 13,247.00 0274807 JACK CARUSO'S REGENCY DODGE 1999-12-23 878.00 0274808 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 1999-12-23 14.12 0274809 KEATING, ROBERT M 1999-12-23 48.96 0274810 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC 1999-12-23 263.27 0274811 KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT 1999-12-23 410.00 0274812 KELL TELEPHONE 1999-12-23 165.00 0274813 KOMARNICKI, WALTER 1999-12-23 54.75 0274814 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 1999-12-23 15.45 0274815 KIPP, BILLY C 1999-12-23 356.49 0274816 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 1999-12-23 642.30 0274817 LIGHT 1999-12-23 494.40 0274818 LESCO, INC 1999-12-23 177.68 0274819 LUNA, JORGE 1999-12-23 55.37 0274820 LAMY, KEVIN 1999-12-23 158.00 0274821 LAQUINTA INN 1999-12-23 51.50 0274822 LEWIS, BARBS 1999-12-23 141.63 0274823 LUNA, JUVENAL 1999-12-23 106.99 0274824 MASSUNG, KIMBERLY E 1999-12-23 24.00 0274825 MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY 1999-12-23 90.00 0274826 MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC 1999-12-23 110.00 0274827 MIKES GARAGE 1999-12-23 44.17 0274828 MILKER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS 1999-12-23 510.00 0274829 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO 1999-12-23 338.40 0274830 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC 1999-12-23 58.91 0274831 MICKLE, VALERIE 1999-12-23 169.95 0274832 MOSS, ROGER 1999-12-23 82.40 0274833 MOSS, MARY 1999-12-23 464.00 0274834 MAIC DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC 1999-12-23 12.07 0274835 MASTERSON, MARION 1999-12-23 209.35 0274836 MURPHY, DEBBIE 1999-12-23 36.05 0274837 MAXWELL, KIMBERLY 1999-12-23 89.66 0274838 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 1999-12-23 5,346.03 0274839 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 50.00 1999-12-23 0274840 NACVSO CAROLINA STATE ARCHIVES 1999-12-23 430.00 0274841 0274842 NORTH OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 1999-12-23 1,208.85 36.301999-12-23 0274843 OMNIGRAPHIC3, INC 1999-12-23 5,495.20 0274844 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 1999-12-23 260.67 0274845 OSCEOLA PHARMACY HAND SURGERY ASSOCIATE 1999-12-23 761.40 0274846 ORLANDO 1999-12-23 282,00 0274847 O'DARE, KELLIE M 1999-12-23 723.55 0274848 OPHELIA'S RESTAURANT AND 1999-12-23 133.36 0274849 PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE 1999-12-23 36,737.00 0274850 PHYSIO CONTROL CORPORATION 1999-12-23 15.80 0274851 PETTY CASH 1999-12-23 217.50 0274852 POLK 1999-12-23 180.00 0274853 PAGE, LIVINGSTON 1999-12-23 60.00 0274854 PINEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 11, 2000 C1 January 11, 2000 7 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0274855 PANGBURN, TERRI 1999-12-23 48.00 0274856 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 1999-12-23 114.20 0274857 PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT 1999-12-23 213.75 0274858 PERSONNEL PLUS INC 1999-12-23 355.52 0274859 PARKER, DEBBIE 1999-12-23 38.63 0274860 PARK, S H 1999-12-23 180.00 0274861 POWERWARE 1999-12-23 1,139.55 0274862 QUALITY BOOKS, INC 1999-12-23 441.58 0274863 R R BOWKER 1999-12-23 285.00 0274864 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC 1999-12-23 313.33 0274865 ROTH PUBLISHING, INC 1999-12-23 776.00 0274866 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 1999-12-23 1,525.31 0274867 RAYSIDE TRUCK AND TRAILER 1999-12-23 52.12 0274868 RECORDED BOOKS INC 1999-12-23 167.40 0274869 R & G SOD FARMS 1999-12-23 255.00 0274870 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 1999-12-23 95.70 0274871 RAPP, PAMELA 1999-12-23 12.00 0274872 ROMANO, CHRISTINA 1999-12-23 18.03 0274873 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC 1999-12-23 813.87 0274874 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 1999-12-23 52.24 0274875 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1999-12-23 265.03 0274876 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC 1999-12-23 112.80 0274877 STATE ATTORNEY 19TH CIRCUIT 1999-12-23 15,184.10 0274878 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR CO 1999-12-23 17.88 0274879 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 1999-12-23 141.30 0274880 ST JOHN'S RIVER WATER MGMT 1999-12-23 700.00 0274881 STEIL, HOLLY 1999-12-23 49.59 0274882 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC 1999-12-23 895.38 0274883 SAFESPACE INC 1999-12-23 1,250.00 0274884 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES 1999-12-23 116.88 0274885 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 1999-12-23 17,984.49 0274886 SWEZEY, SHARON B 1999-12-23 1,000.00 0274887 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-12-23 50.00 0274888 SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC 1999-12-23 230.51 0274889 SUNET DIRECT 1999-12-23 203.40 0274890 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 1999-12-23 250.00 0274891 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 1999-12-23 515.50 0274892 SULLIVAN, RACHEL 1999-12-23 195.70 0274893 SCHWEY, PAUL MATTHEW 1999-12-23 200.00 0274894 SUPER DIP SUB & SANDWICH SHOP 1999-12-23 30.00 0274895 SILEO, STEVEN ANDREW 1999-12-23 180.00 0274896 SONNERBERG. GUY W 1999-12-23 20.07 0274897 STEWART, SARAH LYNN 1999-12-23 57.94 0274898 THOMSON FINANICAL PUBLICATION 1999-12-23 1,009.00 0274899 TIPPIN, JOHN W 1999-12-23 26.68 0274900 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 1999-12-23 48.00 0274901 SMITH, TERRY L 1999-12-23 78.37 0274902 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 1999-12-23 363.75 0274903 UPSTART 1999-12-23 58.33 0274904 ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT 1999-12-23 790.07 0274905 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 1999-12-23 1,590.67 0274906 UMPHREY, MICKEY 1999-12-23 500.00 0274907 VIRGIL'S RADIATOR WORKS 1999-12-23 889.50 0274908 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-12-23 50.42 0274909 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-12-23 150.00 0274910 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 1999-12-23 150.00 January 11, 2000 7 BOOK . FA'UE P CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0274911 VERO HERITAGE, INC 1999-12-23 1,246.67 0274912 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 1999-12-23 2,489.31 0274913 VETERANS INFORMATION SERVICE 1999-12-23 70.00 0274914 VICKERS, REGINALD 1999-12-23 90.00 0274915 WAKEFIELD, JUDITH A 1999-12-23 425.00 027,4916 W W GRAINGER, INC 1999-12-23 478.34 0274917 WIGINTON FIRE SPRINKLEP.S,INC 1999-12-23 3,074.21 0274918 WINN DIXIE 1999-12-23 1,081.53 0274919 WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC 1999-12-23 216.24 0274920 WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC 1999-12-23 92.82 0274921 WILLHOFF, PATSY 1999-12-23 130.00 0274922 WALKERS GLEN WEST LTD 1999-12-23 500.00 0274923 WILSON, MARGARET F 1999-12-23 73.57 0274924 WHITESIDE PARTS & SERVICE INC 1999-12-23 22.95 0274925 WORLDCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC 1999-12-23 56.18 0274926 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 1999-12-23 667.25 0274927 WOLFE, ERIN 1999-12-23 16.74 0274928 WILSON, SUSAN BARNES 1999-12-23 213.73 0274929 XEROX CORPORATION 1999-12-23 492.95 0274930 ZIMMERMANN, KARL 1999-12-23 50.85 0274931 ZAMARRIPA, JAIME 1999-12-23 164.80 0274932 THOMAS, JAMES SR 1999-12-23 411.46 0274933 BLOOMINGBURG, OTTO H 1999-12-23 296.20 0274934 MILLER, JOSEPH AND LLOYD, 1999-12-23 300.96 0274935 MERCURI, DEBRA 1999-12-23 486.14 0274936 JOHNSON, LETISHA D 1999-12-23 494.00 0274937 STEWART, LINDA 1999-12-23 842.16 0274938 COLSON, RENE 1999-12-23 160.00 0274939 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-12-29 182.10 0274940 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC 1999-12-29 65.00 0274941 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION 1999-12-29 5,323.85 0274942 AT EASE ARMY NAVY 1999-12-29 461.00 0274943 ATLANTIC REPORTING 1999-12-29 56.00 0274944 AQUAGENIX LAND -WATER 1999-12-29 191.00 0274945 ADDISON OIL CO 1999-12-29 468.05 0274946 ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER,INC 1999-12-29 257.00 0274947 A T & T 1999-12-29 51.67 0274948 ASPHALT RECYCLING,INC 1999-12-29 25,195.75 0274949 AVATAR UTILITY SERVICES, INC 1999-12-29 12,546.82 0274950 ALTERATIONS 1999-12-29 32.50 0274951 ANICOM, INC 1999-12-29 502.00 0274952 AMERICAN WATER CHEMICALS, INC 1999-12-29 3,840.00 0274953 ASSOCIATES, THE 1999-12-29 7,310.16 0274954 ADVERTISING & SUPPLY 1999-12-29 795.00 0274955 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 1999-12-29 3,009.75 0274956 BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD 1999-12-29 700.00 0274957 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 1999-12-29 201,159.50 0274958 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 1999-12-29 1,395.48 0274959 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC 1999-12-29 778.50 0274960 BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUI 1999-12-29 8.00 0274961 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF 1999-12-29 180.00 0274962 BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC 1999-12-29 208.05 0274963 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 1999-12-29 105.07 0274964 BELLSOUTH 1999-12-29 2,307.50 0274965 BOBCAT OF ORLANDO 1999-12-29 1,053.86 0274966 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 1999-12-29 320.45 0274967 BEAM, BETTY 1999-12-29 15.45 0274968 BROOKER, ELIZABETH STEWART 1999-12-29 1,030.50 0274969 BOATC 1999-12-29 40.00 January 11, 2000 8 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0274970 BARRETT, SOREN PH D 1999-12-29 500.00 0274971 BAILEY, KEVIN 1999-12-29 500.00 0274972 BENTON EXPRESS INC 1999-12-29 30.00 0274973 BELANGER, DANIELLE 1999-12-29 220.50 0274974 BELLSOUTH 1999-12-29 534.63 0274975 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC 1999-12-29 416.42 0274976 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 1999-12-29 50.00 0274977 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E 1999-12-29 189.00 0274978 CLINIC PHARMACY 1999-12-29 251.45 0274979 COPELAND, LINDA 1999-12-29 287.00 0274980 CARTER & VERPLANCK 1999-12-29 143,960.00 0274981 CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL 1999-12-29 308.75 0274982 CSR AMERICA, INC. 1999-12-29 493.81 0274983 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 1999-12-29 431.50 0274984 CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY 1999-12-29 142,521.45 0274985 CONRAD YELVINGTON DIST INC 1999-12-29 19,562.87 0274986 CALDRIN, MINER 1999-12-29 164.13 0274987 CUDNEY, LARRY W AND 1999-12-29 5,268.40 0274988 DAVES SPORTING GOODS 1999-12-29 309.84 0274989 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC 1999-12-29 10,837.75 0274990 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 1999-12-29 58.00 0274991 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 1999-12-29 1,512.43 0274992 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 1999-12-29 20,000.00 0274993 DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE 1999-12-29 625.00 0274994 DIROCCO CONSTRUCTION 1999-12-29 4,096.00 0274995 DOYLE, STEVE 1999-12-29 58.00 0274996 D B ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC 1999-12-29 8,470.70 0274997 ELPEX, INC 1999-12-29 571.04 0274998 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 1999-12-29 3,489.26 0274999 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC 1999-12-29 10,382.09 0275000 EHRLICH, CHAD 1999-12-29 119.46 0275001 FEDEX 1999-12-29 55.90 0275002 FLORIDA DEPT OF LABOR 1999-12-29 25,551.76 0275003 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1999-12-29 12,050.84 0275004 FLORIDA TURFGRASS ASSOCIATION 1999-12-29 175.00 0275005 FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC 1999-12-29 1,576.90 0275006 FLINN, SHEILA I 1999-12-29 77.00 0275007 FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE 1999-12-29 81,556.00 0275008 FLORIDAFFINITY, INC 1999-12-29 17,958.00 0275009 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-12-29 25.00 0275010 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 1999-12-29 95.00 0275011 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC 1999-12-29 29.00 0275012 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK 1999-12-29 3,783.96 0275013 FLORIDA CONFERENCE OF CIRCUIT 1999-12-29 600.00 0275014 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-12-29 1,128.17 0275015 GALL'S INC 1999-12-29 81.49 0275016 GORMAN COMPANY 1999-12-29 1,562.40 0275017 GREENE, ROBERT E 1999-12-29 1,956.77 0275018 GULF CONTROLS CORP 1999-12-29 18.88 0275019 GRILL REFILL, INC 1999-12-29 110.20 0275020 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 1999-12-29 8,186.04 0275021 GOLLNICK, PEGGY 1999-12-29 462.00 0275022 GLACE & RADCLIFFE, INC 1999-12-29 17,420.72 0275023 GOLDEN LAKES SOFTWARE 1999-12-29 2,000.00 0275024 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 1999-12-29 7,950.00 0275025 HACH COMPANY 1999-12-29 108.50 0275026 HILL MANUFACTURING 1999-12-29 375.18 January 11, 2000 BOOK FAUL CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0275027 HENRY PRATT CO 1999-12-29 876.00 0275028 HENDLEY,MD LEON 1999-12-29 29.00 0275029 HOME DEPOT 1999-12-29 60.91 0275030 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-12-29 59,092.00 0275031 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 1999-12-29 18,868.00 0275032 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-12-29 100.00 0275033 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 1999-12-29 45.00 0275034 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 1999-12-29 57.34 0275035 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999-12-29 544.00 0275036 INFILCO DEGREMONT, INC 1999-12-29 28,539.90 0275037 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 1999-12-29 13,808.04 0275038 INSURANCE SERVICING & 1999-12-29 550.00 0275039 IBM CORPORATION 1999-12-29 2,009.93 0275040 INTERLIGHT 1999-12-29 77.15 0275041 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 1999-12-29 370.00 0275042 INTERIM PERSONNEL 1999-12-29 244.80 0275043 INDIAN RIVER SHORES POLICE 1999-12-29 25.00 0275044 IMI -NET, INC 1999-12-29 450.00 0275045 INDIAN RIVER INDUSTRIAL 1999-12-29 267,114.11 0275046 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 1999-12-29 12.91 0275047 INDIAN RIVER HAND 1999-12-29 144.00 0275048 JIFFY PHOTO CENTER 1999-12-29 30.00 0275049 JACOBS GROUP, INC 1999-12-29 58,563.00 0275050 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 1999-12-29 803.59 0275051 JAX NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1999-12-29 10.80 0275052 JENKINS, DIANE G MEYER 1999-12-29 300.00 0275053 JAKUBIAK, DAVID F 1999-12-29 44.60 0275054 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 1999-12-29 3,000.00 0275055 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC 1999-12-29 19,176.83 0275056 KELLY TRACTOR CO 1999-12-29 199.16 0275057 KEY, PATRICIA W 1999-12-29 73.50 0275058 KRUGER, INC 1999-12-29 416,966.00 0275059 K DATA PRODUCTS, INC. 1999-12-29 232.52 0275060 KULP, WILLIAM KEVIN 1999-12-29 220.50 0275061 KAREN POWER TOWER, INC 1999-12-29 70.00 0275062 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 1999-12-29 4,500.58 0275063 L B SMITH, INC 1999-12-29 1,199.99 0275064 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 1999-12-29 307.00 0275065 LFI VERO BEACH, INC 1999-12-29 7,030.36 0275066 LUNA, JORGE 1999-12-29 48.93 0275067 LES CAMELA, ELISA M 1999-12-29 112.00 0275068 LEWIS, BARBARA 1999-12-29 28.33 0275069 LUNA, JUVENAL 1999-12-29 46.35 0275070 LONGEVITY REHAB CENTER 1999-12-29 134.30 0275071 L'HEUREUX, CLIFFORD 1999-12-29 75.00 0275072 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 1999-12-29 267.60 0275073 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1999-12-29 17,265.41 0275074 MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC 1999-12-29 31.95 0275075 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS 1999-12-29 55.10 0275076 MICRO WAREHOUSE 1999-12-29 2,329.74 0275077 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC 1999-12-29 8.55 0275078 MACHO PRODUCTS, INC 1999-12-29 280.95 0275079 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 1999-12-29 304.78 0275080 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 1999-12-29 145.32 0275081 MARC INDUSTRIES 1999-12-29 2,478.83 0275082 MOSS, ROGER 1999-12-29 48.93 0275083 MOSS, MARY 1999-12-29 18.03 0275084 MARTIN, CRISTI 1999-12-29 220.50 January 11, 2000 10 0 0 CHECK NAME NUMBER_ CHECK CHECK DATE AMOUNT 0275085 MCCULLOUGH, BARBARA A FARNAN 1999-12-29 300.00 0275086 MORSE, MARYANNE CLERK OF COURT 1999-12-29 17.00 0275087 MONTANE2, GUSTAVO 1999-12-29 100.00 0275088 NOLTE, DAVID C 1999-12-29 184,746.99 0275089 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 1999-12-29 123.42 0275090 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO 1999-12-29 1,500.00 0275091 NATIONAL TECHNICAL COMMUNI- 1999-12-29 205.00 0275092 N C R 1999-12-29 2,019.06 0275093 NATIONAL REGISTER PUBLISHING 1999-12-29 250.21 0275094 NATIONAL PROPANE CORP 1999-12-29 47.92 0275095 NU CO 2, INC 1999-12-29 1.91 0275096 NOCUTS, INC 1999-12-29 39.40 0275097 NEWCOME, DUKE 1999-12-29 1,294.00 0275098 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 1999-12-29 538.15 0275099 ON IT'S WAY 1999-12-29 746.75 0275100 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 1999-12-29 389.40 0275101 ORLANDO, KAREN M 1999-12-29 24.50 0275102 PARKS RENTAL INC 1999-12-29 764.90 0275103 PHILLIPS, LINDA R 1999-12-29 357.00 0275104 P B S & J 1999-12-29 6,200.00 0275105 P B S VIDEO 1999-12-29 89.71 0275106 PARLIAMENTARY REPORTING OF 1999-12-29 1,878.60 0275107 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 1999-12-29 77.94 0275108 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES 1999-12-29 635.76 0275109 PARKER, DEBBIE 1999-12-29 15.45 0275110 PHOTIKON 1999-12-29 129.23 0275111 RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD 1999-12-29 650.00 0275112 RINGHAVER EQUIPMENT CO 1999-12-29 1,830.62 0275113 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 1999-12-29 2,913.21 0275114 RICHARDSON, PATRICIA J 1999-12-29 300.00 0275115 ROMANO, CHRISTINA 1999-12-29 38.63 0275116 ROADBIND AMERICA INC 1999-12-29 4,500.00 0275117 SCOTTY'S, INC 1999-12-29 147.72 0275118 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 1999-12-29 150.00 0275119 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE 1999-12-29 4,534.25 0275120 SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF 1999-12-29 3,315.06 0275121 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 1999-12-29 143.92 0275122 SUN TELEPHONE, INC 1999-12-29 60.00 0275123 STEWART TITLE OF INDIAN RIVER 1999-12-29 12,250.00 0275124 SEXTON, HILDY 1999-12-29 80.00 0275125 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 1999-12-29 5,681.31 0275126 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-12-29 75.00 0275127 SMITH, DONALD 1999-12-29 1,044.00 0275128 SECURITYLINK FROM 1999-12-29 82.50 0275129 SUNET DIRECT 1999-12-29 425.85 0275130 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 1999-12-29 61.60 0275131 SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC 1999-12-29 146,757.06 0275132 SILEO, STEVEN ANDREW 1999-12-29 210.00 0275133 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 1999-12-29 188.79 0275134 SUN STATE SYSTEMS INC 1999-12-29 14,736.26 0275135 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 1999-12-29 310.33 0275136 SEBASTIAN POWER CENTER RENTAL 1999-12-29 535.26 0275137 STEWART, SARAH LYNN 1999-12-29 54.08 0275138 SOUTHWESTERN SUPPLIERS INC 1999-12-29 510.54 0275139 SEWAH STUDIOS INC 1999-12-29 1,530.00 0275140 TARMAC AMERICA INC 1999-12-29 292.05 0275141 TEE JAY'S ENGRAVING & RUBBER 1999-12-29 30.00 0275142 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 1999-12-29 5,713.16 January 11, 2000 11 BOOK PAGE c BOOK �. �. f�1GE CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0275143 THOMAS, DEBBY L 1999-12-29 178.50 0275144 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 1999-12-29 114,137.94 0275145 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC 1999-12-29 9,066.20 0275146 TRACEY, MARTIN L., PH D 1999-12-29 487.50 0275147 TLG 1999-12-29 490.00 0275148 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 1999-12-29 75.00 0275149 TREASURE COAST MASSAGE THERAPY 1999-12-29 91.00 0275150 TROPICAL SECRETARIAL 1999-12-29 165.75 0275151 TAYLOR. ARON 1999-12-29 357.00 0275152 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 1999-12-29 13,747.14 0275153 U.S. COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS INC 1999-12-29 84.95 0275154 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-12-29 745.57 0275155 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-12-29 19,639.99 0275156 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-12-29 9,175.00 0275157 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 1999-12-29 1,683.74 0275158 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999-12-29 50.00 0275159 VEY, CARRIE 1999-12-29 325.50 0275160 VERO BEARING & BOLT 1999-12-29 154.45 0275161 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 1999-12-29 75.00 0275162 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1999-12-29 551.60 0275163 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1999-12-29 105.38 0275164 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1999-12-29 19.74 0275165 WILLHOFF, PATSY 1999-12-29 130.00 0275166 WATERWORKS CAR WASH 1999-12-29 112.50 0275167 WAL-MART STORES, INC 1999-12-29 835.97 0275168 WASTE MANAGEMENT 1999-12-29 85,903.86 0275169 WOLFE, ERIN 1999-12-29 38.63 0275170 WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC 1999-12-29 162.93 0275171 WILLIAMS, ALAN DALE 1999-12-29 1,400.00 0275172 ZANCA, LEONARD 1999-12-29 174.00 0275173 ZAMARRIPA, JAIME 1999-12-29 48.93 0275174 VALENTINI, PATRICK 1999-12-29 601.50 0275175 GREGG, JAMES 1999-12-29 56.14 0275176 TOZZOLO BROTHERS 1999-12-29 4.82 0275177 SIMMONS, JACQUELINE 1999-12-29 59.63 0275178 PRYOR SR, ELIGHA 1999-12-29 41.45 0275179 SCHOMMER, ALAN 1999-12-29 142.60 0275180 ROBS, BAYARD 1999-12-29 84.62 0275181 TILLER, GRACE 1999-12-29 27.97 0275182 HAIR DYNAMICS 1999-12-29 17.76 0275183 BURGOON BERGER CONST CO 1999-12-29 40.49 0275184 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 1999-12-29 130.34 0275185 SLADE, TIMOTHY T 1999-12-29 10.98 0275186 INMAN, TAMMI 1999-12-29 79.32 0275187 REESE, RONALD V 1999-12-29 10.41 0275188 REGO, TOM 1999-12-29 83.15 0275189 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 1999-12-29 274.82 0275190 STEWART, DAVID 1999-12-29 41.99 0275191 BULLOCK, SHARON 1999-12-29 11.95 0275192 LYSAGHT JR, ROBERT J 1999-12-29 21.80 0275193 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 1999-12-29 202.07 0275194 ELLIOTT, LESLIE W 1999-12-29 74.55 0275195 FIELD, PAUL L 1999-12-29 19.71 0275196 HOCKENBURY, BRENDA 1999-12-29 6.02 0275197 MURRAY, MARY & RUTHVEN 1999-12-29 66.64 0275198 STARK, ITZHAK 1999-12-29 48.40 0275199 ANDERSON, R J 1999-12-29 75.97 0275200 BELLOW, NATASHA 1999-12-29 68.27 January 11, 2000 12 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0275201 VANDEN BOSCH, OTTO E 1999-12-29 64.86 0275202 GHO VERO BEACH INC 1999-12-29 160.66 0275203 JOHNSON, LADONNA F 1999-12-29 40.56 0275204 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 1999-12-29 34.85 0275205 ELSEY, WILLIAM & VIOLETTA 1999-12-29 42.69 0275206 PETRULAK, CASSANDRA G 1999-12-29 29.23 0275207 ST LUCIE DEVELOPMENT CORP 1999-12-29 83.20 0275208 FLYNN JR, MICHAEL 1999-12-29 6.53 0275209 FITZPATRICK SR, DONALD R 1999-12-29 35.93 0275210 TIPTON, MARY FRANCES 1999-12-29 43.43 0275211 COLDWELL BANKER 1999-12-29 33.55 0275212 ASH, SITYWANDRA 1999-12-29 60.02 0275213 HOLZNECHT, RAYMOND & SUSAN 1999-12-29 84.74 0275214 VISCUSI, HENRY 1999-12-29 54.20 0275215 GRESS, MAVIS & RICHARD 1999-12-29 78.54 0275216 HERAN, DEAN 1999-12-29 62.21 0275217 MC CALL JR, WILMER C 1999-12-29 58.10 0275218 CREAMER, JOSEPH A 1999-12-29 27.76 0275219 ROSS, CATERIA P 1999-12-29 3.82 0275220 LUBOLD, NANCY J 1999-12-29 75.26 0275221 NEMETH, ALBERT F 1999-12-29 76.24 0275222 KELLYJONES, CECILIA 0 1999-12-29 16.81 0275223 TIGHE, EDWARD M 1999-12-29 75.96 0275224 PARKS, TERESA M 1999-12-29 6.92 0275225 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 1999-12-29 10.32 0275226 ACHINO, RONALD 1999-12-29 26.54 0275227 REYNOLDS, RUSSELL 1999-12-29 65.63 0275228 BEATTIE, DAWN T 1999-12-29 55.46 0275229 PERKINS, TIMOTHY & LUCINDA 1999-12-29 65.73 0275230 HYATT, SHANNON 1999-12-29 69.36 0275231 POE, SHELLEY M 1999-12-29 12.18 0275232 AMERITREND HOMES 1999-12-29 89.48 0275233 PETERSON JR, DENNIS E 1999-12-29 36.25 0275234 PREVITE, PIETRO 1999-12-29 42.16 0275235 HERBIG, MARLENE J 1999-12-29 44.41 0275236 WORSHAM, PATRICK 1999-12-29 68.20 0275237 VOUTILA, VETJO 1999-12-29 38.68 0275238 HARRIS, KERRY 1999-12-29 32.14 0275239 STOWERS, WANDA RINEHART 1999-12-29 80.37 0275240 BOWERS, PAMELA 1999-12-29 16.30 0275241 BURGOS, DEADINA 1999-12-29 45.86 0275242 MAIKRANZ, KEITH 1999-12-29 28.00 0275243 BROWN, DONALD D 1999-12-29 90.09 0275244 REVELS, CHRISTOPHER A 1999-12-29 34.01 0275245 CONLEY, MICHAEL A 1999-12-29 58.61 0275246 USAGA, OSCAR A 1999-12-29 40.40 0275247 PARTEN, DIANA F 1999-12-29 76.09 0275248 MATHURA, RANI NEWMAN 1999-12-29 70.17 0275249 WEBB, MEELAQUESHA C 1999-12-29 61.94 0275250 SMITH, ELLEN L 1999-12-29 64.90 0275251 LANGLEY, MIKE 1999-12-29 22.05 0275252 MASLIN, TIM 1999-12-29 40.39 0275253 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR LTD 1999-12-29 142.43 0275254 BARTER, SCOTT H 1999-12-29 75.03 0275255 GOLDBERG, JACQUELINE 1999-12-29 20.68 0275256 DAVIS, ALEX 1999-12-29 34.89 0275257 WALLACE, SHIRLEY M 1999-12-29 2.57 0275258 AVERILL, BRIAN 1999-12-29 13.50 January 11, 2000 13 EOOK FACE r� F, BOOK. PAGE L CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0275259 STARK, ROD 1999-12-29 3.07 0275260 MURPHY, STARLETTA 1999-12-29 17.68 0275261 COLLETTE, NICK 1999-12-29 31.48 0275262 TEAGUE, MARIE 1999-12-29 66.98 0275263 BALL, FRANKLIN 1999-12-29 16.46 0275264 GIAMBANCO, GIUSEPPE 1999-12-29 25.09 0275265 BYERS DR, GORDON 1999-12-29 198.10 0275266 PIERRE, JUSLAINE 1999-12-29 73.64 0275267 WILLEY, ALICE P 1999-12-29 39.81 0275268 CAL BUILDERS INC 1999-12-29 30.81 0275269 BERGER, HARRIS 1999-12-29 162.38 0275270 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 1999-12-29 39.91 0275271 ROSEWOOD COURT DEV CORP 1999-12-29 61.12 0275272 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION 1999-12-29 15.99 0275273 ANDERSSON, ULF 1999-12-29 17.20 0275274 HELMS, DONALD LEE 1999-12-29 63.39 0275275 WYATT, SHAWNEE 1999-12-29 2.23 0275276 SCHRIVE, M/M ROBERT 1999-12-29 71.89 0275277 KISSELBACK, PETER 1999-12-29 49.26 0275278 MCDUFFIE, HAROLD C & JANICE 1999-12-29 31.03 0275279 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 1999-12-29 54.96 0275280 MURPHY, CINDI 1999-12-29 92.17 0275281 ALVARADO, AUDREY 1999-12-29 19.61 0275282 RIVERHOUSE, INC 1999-12-29 60.45 0275283 STERLING HOUSE CORPORTATION 1999-12-29 1,522.81 0275284 MICHAEL MLEKO GENERAL CONTRACT 1999-12-29 40.68 0275285 REED, WAYNE & LINDA 1999-12-29 16.02 0275286 LASKY, PETER G 1999-12-29 41.40 0275287 ARMSTRONG, J TODD 1999-12-29 61.77 0275288 VIL•L_AREAL, INGA K 1999-12-29 27.97 0275289 LAFOND, JERRI 1999-12-29 36.20 0275290 LASKY, INDRA 1999-12-29 43.96 0275291 HUPPENTHAL, KATHRYN 1999-12-29 36.21 0275292 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 1999-12-29 10.72 0275293 SMITH, FRANK E 1999-12-29 52.77 0275294 MARLIN DEV & CONST MGMT INC 1999-12-29 78.82 0275295 GANGLOFF, TERESA 1999-12-29 19.85 0275296 SPECTRUM 1999-12-29 90.62 0275297 HAM, JOEROY 1999-12-29 29.36 0275298 WESSELL, MISTY 1999-12-29 23.06 0275299 ANDRESS, TONY 1999-12-29 11.30 0275300 FUQUAY, CARRIE B 1999-12-29 41.31 0275301 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC 1999-12-29 6.28 0275302 GORUM, SHAUN 1999-12-29 17.87 0275303 SIMPSON, CARLA & WILLIAM 1999-12-29 8.40 0275304 MINCEY, DARYL 1999-12-29 7.17 0275305 DALU, VIRGINIA 1999-12-29 67.69 0275306 LECKLITNER, ED 1999-12-29 58.30 0275307 LEWIS, SAMUEL L 1999-12-29 77.51 0275308 BRYANT, RICK 1999-12-29 50.44 0275309 DAVIDSON, DEAN 1999-12-29 43.44 0275310 MITRANO, NICK J 1999-12-29 26.70 0275311 HALL, REBECCA & TOM 1999-12-29 25.39 0275312 MARQUEZ, CARLOS A 1999-12-29 76.33 0275313 ABBEY, BERT 1999-12-29 77.86 January 11, 2000 14 3,061,306.34 0 7. C. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 004 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 4, 2000: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 4, 2000 SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 004 THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County ministrator FROM: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following: On October 12,1999, the Board of Commissioners approved an Article V Court Grant for $29,790. The attached entry appropriates funding. 2. The Budget Office underestimated the sick incentive for Environmental Planning. The attached entry appropriates funding from M.S.T.U. reserve for contingencies. 3. On September 7, 1999, the Board of Commissioners approved a Litter Control Grant from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for $17,500. The attached entry appropriates funding. 4. Indian River County entered a Joint Participation Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation on August 18, 1998 for preparation of an Interchange Justification Report. The attached entry appropriates $70,000 in grant funding. 5. On December 21, 1999, the Board of Commissioners approved air quality improvements at the Health Department building for $100,000. A contribution from the Health Department for $40,000, plus $60,000 from General Fund contingencies will provide funding. 6. On January 4, 2000, the Board of Commissioners approved paying costs associated with tax deed applications on 23 parcels. The attached entry appropriates funding of $5,715 from General Fund contingencies. 7. County Engineering needs a new computer network switch at a cost of $1,200. The attached entry appropriates funds from Transportation contingencies. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment. January 11, 2000 15 • HO ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 004, as recommended in the Memorandum. TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator 1'-' L i ,H s -'s -7 BUDGET AMENDMENT: 004 DATE: January 11. 2000 Entry Number Fund/Department/ Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1. REVENUES GENERAL FUND/ Article V Trust Fund Grant 001-000-334-820.00 $29,790 $0 EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Circuit Court/ Special Public Defender Costs 001-901-621-033.19 $10,000 $0 GENERAL FUND/ Circuit Court/ Expert Witness Fees 001-901-619-034.92 $7,290 $0 GENERAL FUND/ Circuit Court/ Court Reporter Transcription 001-905-615-033.32 $12,500 $0 2. EXPENSES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Enviro. Planning/ Special Pay 004-207-524011.15 $500 $0 MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT/ Reserve for Contingencies 004199-581-099.91 $0 $500 3. REVENUES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DIST./ Litter Control Grant 411-000-334326.00 $17,500 $0 EXPENSES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DIST./ Keep Indian River Beautiful 411-209-534-088.84 $17,500 $0 January 11, 2000 16 • TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator BUDGET AMENDMENT: 004 DATE: January 11. 2000 Entry Number Fund/Department/ Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 4. REVENUES METRO. PLANNING ORG./ State Grants - FDOT 124-000-334-404.00 $70,000 $0 EXPENSES METRO. PLANNING ORG./ Other Contractual Services 124-204515-033.49 $70,000 $0 5. REVENUES GENERAL FUND/ Reimbursements 001-000-369-040.00 $40,000 $0 EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Buildings & Grounds/ Air Conditioning 001-220-519-041.23 $100,000 $0 GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies 001-199-581-099.91 $0 $60,000 6. EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Board of Commissioners/ Professional Svcs. 001-101-511-033.19 $5,715 $0 GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies 001-199-581-099.91 $0 $5,715 7. EXPENSES TRANSPORTATION FUND/ County Engineering/ EDP Equipment 111-245-541-066.47 $1,200 $0 TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies 111-199-581-099.91 $0 $1,200 January 11, 2000 17 • mor. I 1 14 FAGC r " 9 BOOK .SII F'AG.t 7.D. Local Collection of the Tourist Development Tax Deleted. 7.E. Approval of BellSouth Special Service Agreement to Upgrade 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Point Telephone Devices or the Dead' The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 28, 1999: TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Doug Wright, Director Emergency Services � DATE: December 28, 1999 SUBJECT: Approval Of BellSouth Special Service Agreement To Upgrade 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Point Telephone Devices for the Deaf It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next regular scheduled meeting. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: As part of the process of upgrading the electronics in the two 9-1-1 public safety answering points (PSAP) in the County for Y2K replacement of the existing telephone devices for the deaf (TDD) is required. This upgrade is recommended for both the Indian River County Sheriffs Office Central Communications Center and the Vero Beach Police Department Communications Center, due to the compatibility with the current 911 Positron telephone equipment, the computer aided dispatch (CAD) equipment and year 2000 compliance. The Agreement provides for the installation of the Positron Express TDD equipment for a one-time installation charge of $193.00/per unit and a recurring fee of $23.00 per month/unit for a period of 60 months. Additionally, a non-recurring one time contract preparation charge of $283.00 will be applied. The funds for payment of the recurring fees and other costs associated with equipment at the PSAP's are derived from the $.50 per phone line surcharge authorized by State statute. Funds to pay for the installation and recurring monthly charges are budgeted in the Communications Center (001-107) telephone account. January 11, 2000 18 • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the BellSouth Special Service Arrangement Agreement and authorize the necessary budget expenditures to pay the one-time installation charge, contract preparation charges, and the monthly recurring fees referenced above. ATTACHMENTS: Special Service Arrangement Agreement #FL99-7695-01 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the BellSouth Special Service Arrangement Agreement and authorized the necessary budget expenditures to pay the one- time installation charge, contract preparation charges, and the monthly recurring fees as set out and recommended in the Memorandum. COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN TAE OFFICE OF TAE CLERK TO TAE BOARD 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - UNITY CENTER OF VERO BEACH REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A PLACE OF WORSHIP PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISIIdM-Tr FOR BEARING IS ON FILE IN TAE OFFICE OF TAE CLERK TO TAE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 4, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DMSION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Keating, AtCP Community Development Duector 16 THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director January 11, 2000 19 BOOK FAG �� • FROM: John W. McCoy � �'�ti� Senior Planner, Community Development DATE: January 4, 2000 SUBJECT: Unity Center of Vero Beach Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Construct a Place of Worship It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 11, 2000. On behalf of the Unity Center of Vero Beach, Mosby & Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for major site plan and special exception use approval to construct a place of worship in two phases. No day care or school use is proposed. The site address is 950 431 Avenue and is located on the southeast comer of 101" Street and 431 Avenue. Because the site is located within the RS -6 residential zoning district, special exception use approval must be granted for the place of worship use. At its regular meeting of December 91', the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously (7-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval, subject to the conditions set forth in the recommendation section of this report. Also, the Commission granted major site plan approval subject to Board approval of the special exception use request (see attachment #5). Therefore, site plan approval will become effective upon Board approval of the special exception use request. The Board is now to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the special exception use request. Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and surrounding area The Board may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area 1. Total Area of Development: 2. Zoning Classification: 3. Land Use Designation: 4. Phasing: 7.02 acres RS -6, Single -Family Residential (up to 6 unitstacre) L-2, Low Density (up to 6 units per acre) Phase I will include the majority of the sanctuary along with all of the paved parking, the entire stormwater management system, and all of the landscaping. Phase II will include an expansion of the sanctuary area along with some accessory building area and the parking necessary for the expansion. January 11, 2000 20 • 5. Total Impervious Surface: Proposed (Phase I): 76,140 sq. ft. Proposed (Phase II): 27.169 sq. ft. Total: 103,309 sq. ft. Note: Impervious surface area includes building, driveway, sidewalks, and parking. 6. Open Space: Required: 40 % Proposed: 64.9% (at buildout/end of Phase II) 7. Building Area: Proposed (Phase I): 9,032 sq. ft. Proposed (Phase II): 10.174 sg. ft. Total: 19,206 sq. ft. Note. Building area includes an auditorium, offices, and multi-purpose rooms. 8. Traffic Circulation: The site will have a main access to 431 Avenue and a secondary access to 101 Street. Both accesses are proposed as full movement two-way driveways. The 431 Avenue driveway will be used to access the main parking lot, which is laid out with one-way driving aisles and angled parking. The internal circulation and driveway locations have been approved by the Traffic Engineering Division. Due to the low number of anticipated trips, there are no off-site traffic improvements required. 9. Off -Street Parking: Phase I Required: 83 spaces Proposed: 84 spaces (26 concrete) Phase II Required: 60 spaces PE=sed: 68 =aces Total (Phase I and II) Required: 143 spaces Total (Phase I and II) Proposed: 152 spaces Note. There will be 26 concrete spaces constructed with the Phase I parking. All other spaces will be stabilized. For infrequent uses such as places of worship, parking spaces may be stabilized and unpaved in accordance with the LDRs. Most of the proposed spaces (126 out of 152) are to be stabilized and grassed. The proposed driveway that will serve these spaces will be paved. These proposed improvements have been approved by Public Works. 10. Stormwater Management: The proposed stormwater management plan, which includes provision of a retention area in the northwest comer of the site, has been approved by the Public Works Department. For some time now, the applicant and Public Works staff have January 11, 2000 21 Boa J I BOOK PAGE coordinated on providing stormwater management capacity on the project site for the future 43' Avenue widening project. The Capital Project Improvement section ofthe Public Works Department is negotiating with the applicant to use the stormwater tract to handle some of the run-off from improvements to be made via a future 43'd Avenue widening project. The proposed site plan appears to be sized to handle project run-off and to provide some stormwater management capacity for the future 431 Avenue widening project Public Works has no objection to site plan approval. Prior to site plan release, the applicant is required to obtain a county stormwater management permit. 11. Landscaping Plan: The landscape plan is in compliance with Chapter 926 requirements, and incorporates many of the site's existing trees. That plan depicts a Type "C" buffer between the proposed facilities and the adjacent single-family zoned property. This buffer is proposed to be located on all site perimeters and satisfies the specific land use criteria buffer requirement for places of worship, as well as the required road buffers along the site's 43'd Avenue and l Od' Street frontages. 12. Environmental: Since the site is over 5 acres, the native upland habitat preservation criteria of section 929.05 could apply. However, the environmental planning staff has determined that no native upland habitat exists on-site. Therefore, no preservation is required under LDR section 929.05. There is a.38 acre isolated jurisdictional wetland located on the site which will be impacted by construction of the proposed stormwater pond. Mitigation for these impacts is required. Specific mitigation measures will be established via the St. John's River Water Management Control District permit and County Wetland Resource permit process. The applicant must obtain these permits prior to site plan release. 13. Utilities: The site will be served by county potable water and sewer. These utility provisions have been approved by the Environmental Health Department and the Department of Utility Services. 14. Specific Land Use Criteria: The application must satisfy all applicable specific land use criteria for a place of worship. The place of worship specific land use criteria are as follows: January 11, 2000 a. No building or structure shall be located closer than thirty (30) feet to any property line abutting a residential use or residentially designated property. Note: All proposed structures will be set back 30' or more from adjacent property lines. b. Access shall be from a major thoroughfare unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. Note: The site has access from 431 Avenue which is a major thoroughfare roadway that is classified as an urban collector roadway. 22 C. Any accessory residential use, day care facility or school upon the premises shall provide such additional lot area as required for such use by this section and shall further be subject to all conditions set forth by the reviewing procedures and standards for that particular use. Accessory residential uses may include convents, monasteries, rectories or parsonages as required by these regulations. Note. No such uses or facilities are proposed. d. Type "C" screening shall be provided along all property boundaries where the facility is located adjacent to a single-family residentially designated Property. Type "D" screening shall be provided along all property boundaries when the facility is located adjacent to a multiple -family residentially designated property. 1. The Board of County Commissioners may waive or reduce the buffer requirements where the place of worship is located next to an existing cemetery, place of worship, childcare facility, community center, or school. Consideration shall be given to security, noise, and visual impacts. Where a waiver or a buffer reduction is granted, normal perimeter landscaping requirements shall apply, and alternative requirements (such as fencing) may be required. Note. Type "C" buffers have been depicted on the proposed site plan along all site boundaries. Thus, all the applicable specific land use criteria have been satisfied by the site plan application. 15. Dedication and Improvements: Presently, 35' of right-of-way exists for 10'" Street which is classified as a local road requiring 60' of right-of-way. Due to the fact that all of the existing right-of-way was Previously dedicated from property to the north, the remaining 25' of right-of-way deficiency must be made-up from the subject site. The applicant is proposing to dedicate without compensation an additional 15' of right-of-way and a 10' drainage and utility easement to satisfy the 60' wide local road right-of-way for the subject segment of 101 Street. This proposal conforms to LDR requirements, is depicted on the site plan, is allowed by the LDRs, and is acceptable to the Public Works Department. The right-of-way dedication and grant of easement will need to take place prior to site plan release. Presently, the subject segment of 10* Street is an unpaved, stabilized two-way road. Because the project constitutes a small trip generator and access to I 01 Street is "secondary", according to the LDRs the applicant must pave to the project's Proposed entrance on 10' Street or otherwise guarantee that the improvement will be completed. The improvement or guarantee will need to be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The guarantee may take the form of a guarantee from the county to perform such paving as part of the 43rd Avenue widening project. January 11, 2000 23 BOOK Pr1GE I The sidewalk and bikeway plan requires a 5' wide sidewalk along 43nd Avenue. Public Works has verified that this required improvement will be constructed as part of the 431d Avenue widening project. Thus, provision of this improvement has already been guaranteed. 16. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: 10d' Street, Single Family Homes/RS-6 South: Anna Belle's Way Subdivision (approved, not yet constructed, existing grove)/RS-6 East: Single Family Homes, The Laurels Subdivision/RS-6 West: 431d Avenue, Glendale Lakes Subdivision/RS-6 Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception approval for the requested place of worship use, subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall: 1. Dedicate to the county, without compensation, 15' of additional right- of-way for 101 Street and a parallel 10' drainage and utility easement as depicted on the site plan, and 2. Obtain a county wetland resource permit. B. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project, the applicant shall: 1. Either pave l Od' Street from 431' Avenue to the project's proposed 10' Street entrance or otherwise guarantee via posted security or a commitment from the county that the paving improvement will be completed. 2. Install the required Type "C" buffers as depicted on the approved site plan. 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Site Plan 4. Landscape Plan 5. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes (DRAFT) January 11, 2000 24 Ff�Ur C.+re • Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the memorandum with the aid of a location map and site plan (pages 35 & 36 of the backup) displayed on the overhead. He reviewed staffs recommendation and each of the conditions. In response to Vice Chairman Ginn's inquiry, Director Boling advised that all stormwater management conditions are being met; the project stands alone when testing the compliance. In response to Commissioner Stanbridge's question about the grove adjacent to the subject property, Director Boling advised that property has been approved for a subdivision. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Chip Landers, 180 14'h Avenue, advised he has an interest in the property to the south of the subject property. He inquired what type of buffer would be provided to the south and if there would be a berm. Director Boling advised that a type "C" buffer is on the landscape plan with at least 30' of green area. He advised that a berm is not required. John Dean advised that he is the architect of record for the project and advised that both Minister Richard Rieger and Associate Minister Ed Reifer were present from the Unity Center. He presented a handout with the Landscape Plan Criteria, Landscape Planting Details, and a sketch of the building. He advised that this is a large property on 431 Avenue, which will soon have 5 lanes, and could be used for single-family housing. He presented a drawing of the building and described it as a Mediterranean style facility. He stated there will be a lake the size of a football field and described the other enhancements. The Australian pines will be removed and a minimum type "C" buffer will be provided. They January 11, 2000 25 `' 7BOOK Pt1Ut�P-,d.�' Bout will try to save as many of the other trees as possible. The desire is that it will be a functional and beautiful project. There will be 60% open space, which is greater than the 40% required He pointed out that the plan has the full support of the Planning Director and the Planning & Zoning Commission. They have no argument with any of the conditions that have been recommended. (CLERK'S NOTE: MR. DEAN'S HANDOUT HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE BACKUP OF THE MEETING.) Leo Cahill, 1195 43' Avenue, read a short letter which he stated was signed by the neighbors. The letters stated their concerns and opposition to the exceptional use. Their concerns included lowered market value of their properties, commercial design of the necessary roadway amendments, and the development of the 43' Avenue corridor. Personally, he was concerned about the double impact to the intersection of 43' Avenue and 12' Street since he believed both will be expanded to 5 lanes. (CLERK'S NOTE: The letter was presented for the record and it has been filed with the backup for the meeting in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) Mr. Cunningham, 1015 41' Avenue, expressed concerns about drainage in the area. He believed the planned project will exacerbate a problem that already exists. Director Boling addressed the drainage issue and advised that the applicant will have to get a stormwater management plan approved before moving forward. That will also be reviewed by the County's Engineering Department. Public Works Director James W. Davis stated that the drainage plan for the project must be designed to handle the on-site drainage and cannot negatively impact other properties. He advised that a storm sewer will be put in place when 43' Avenue is widened. He further explained the diversion of stormwater in response to a question from Commissioner Ginn. January 11, 2000 W 0 0 U It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Grin, the Board unanimously granted special exception approval for the requested place of worship use, subject to the conditions as set forth in the memorandum and as recommended by staff. 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-001- REZONE APPROXIMATELY 191.54 ACRES FROM A-1 (,AGRICULTURAL AND RS -3 (SINGLE FAMILY UP TO 3 UNITS PER ACRE) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) AND CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN APPROVAL FOR A DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWN AS CITRUS SPRINGS - SUNTREE PARTNERS, INC. PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEM!RiT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TAE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 4, 2000: TO: James E: Chandler DATE: January 4, 2000 County Administrator D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Kea ' g, Community Deevvelopment Direcr /4 THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director FROM: John W. McCoy Senior Planner, Community Development SUBJECT: Suntree Partners Inn's Request to Rezone Approximately 191.54 Acres from A- 1 (Agricultural) and RS -3 (Single -Family up to 3 units/acre) to PD (Planned Development) and to Receive Conceptual PD Plan Approval for a Development to be Known as Citrus Springs January 11, 2000 27 BOOK r -�� BOOK F,�"E 6J!,jJ It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 11, 2000. This is a request by Suntree Partners, Inc., through its agent Knight, McGuire and Associates, Inc., to rezone approximately 191.64 acres. Approximately 181.54 acres are zzoned -1plan the remaining 10 acres are zoned RS -3. As part of the PD rezoning request,conceptual been submitted for review and approval. The subject site is located northeast of the intersection of 58'" Avenue and 9' Street SW, and runs north from 9" Street SW, across 5'" Street SW, to the South Relief Canal. The purpose of this request is to secure a zoning which allows construction of single- family homes on lots of various sizes, many of which are smaller that the RS -3 zoning district's minimum lot size, and which also allows multi -family units and accessory commercial uses that are internal to the project. The project design is similar to the one considered by the Board of County Commissioners at its meetings of July 13, 1999 and August 3, 1999 for a project also called "Citrus Springs". The main differences between the original proposal, which was denied by the Board of County Commissioners on August 3, 1999, and the subject proposal are that the current proposal covers an area 25.7 acres smaller than the other proposal, proposes fewer units (477 vs 645), has a duplex component rather than a triplex component, has less density (2.49 units/acre vs 2.96 unitstacre), and proposes fewer waivers from RS -3 zoning district standards. ♦ Planning and Zoning Commission Action At its regular meeting of December 9, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the conceptual plan and PD rezoning with the conditions recommended by staff and one modified condition. That Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for a modified condition would require a Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature along the project's Lateral B Canal/58th Avenue frontage rather than the Type "C" buffer opaque feature proposed (see attachment #5). ♦ Time Limit for Re -Applying LDR section 902.12(5) states that, when a rezoning application has been previously acted upon by the Board of County Commissioners, no new application for an amendment, change, or modification of the official zoning atlas on substantially the same lands shall be permitted to be filed until the expiration of at least 12 months from the filing of the previous application. Based on the application covering substantially different property as well as the opinion of the County Attorney's Office, staff determined that this proposal is to be treated as a new proposal and different from the previous "Citrus Springs" proposal. Therefore, staff has not applied the 12 month waiting period to this application. ♦ Development Approval Options Available to the Developer Because most of the site is zoned A-1, Agricultural (1 unit / 5 acres), the applicant must rezone the property to a residential zoning district to allow for residential development. Any rezoning action must comply with the site's land use designation which is L-1, Low Density Residential I (up to 3 unitstacre). There are two options available to the developer to seek approval of the proposed project. Either of the two options, if approved, would allow the applicant to proceed with a residential project. These options are as follows: January 11, 2000 28 • Rezone the site to a standard residential zoning district which allows a density of no more than 3 unitslacre, and propose development under a conventional subdivision application or a PD (planned development) application for special exception use approval. 2. Rezone the site to a PD zoning district that is tied to a conceptual PD plan proposing a density not exceeding 3 unitstacre. The developer has opted for a PD rezoning, option #2 above. If approved, the proposal would effectively rezone the property and approve the conceptual PD plan in one set of public hearings. ♦ The PD Zoning District, Generally Several residential projects have been approved through the PD rezoning process. These include Pointe West and Old Orchid. Unlike standard zoning districts, PD districts have no specific lot size or dimension criteria. Instead, the PD district is based on the underlying land use plan designation for density and use limitations, and on compatibility requirements. In the PD zoning district, setbacks and other typical zoning district regulations are established on a site by site basis through approval of a conceptual PD plan. Adopted as part of the PD zoning for a property, the conceptual plan provides the lot size and dimensional standards for the project. A rezoning to the PD district requires submission of a binding conceptual PD plan which, along with certain PD district requirements, limits uses and sets -forth specific development standards on the site. Thus, a PD rezoning allows a unique PD district to be developed specifically for each development site. In this case, the conceptual PD plan proposes the phased development of 477 residential units, including a mix of single-family units (369) and duplex units (108). Also included in the project will be a clubhouse, recreational amenities, common open space, lakes, certain buffers, and an internal accessory commercial area. In planning staffs opinion, the PD rezoning option is the best alternative for approving residential development on the subject site. Unlike other zoning districts, the PD zoning district allows the county to consider the appropriateness of the proposed development design as part of a rezoning request. ♦ The PD Rezoning Process The PD rezoning review, approval, and development process is as follows: STEP 1 Rezoning and conceptual PD plan approval: Review and recommendation made by staff and by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Final action taken by the Board of County Commissioners. STEP 2 Preliminary PD plan (combination of site plan and preliminary plat) approval: Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action taken by the Planning and Zoning Commission, subject to the Board's action on the rezoning request. STEP 3 Land Development Permit or Permit Waiver. Reviewed and issued by staff for construction of subdivision improvements (roads, utilities, drainage). January 11, 2000 NJ MR I J<I PA G L � ��. • BOOK . 1d Fr�LL U STEP 4 Building Permit(s): Reviewed and issued by staff for construction of buildings. STEP 5 Final PD Plat approval: Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action taken by the Board of County Commissions. STEP 6 Certificate of Occupancy: Reviewed and issued by staff for use and occupancy of buildings. The applicant is pursuing STEP 1 of the process. Once a PD conceptual plan is approved, only minor modifications to the conceptual plan can be approved at a staff level. Any changes proposed to an approved conceptual plan that would intensify the site use (e.g. increase the maximum number of lots) or reduce compatibility elements (e.g. reduce buffering) can be approved only via a process involving public hearings held by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. Proposed PD District for the Project Site The subject site has an L-1 land use designation. This underlying land use designation allows a variety of single-family districts and a multi -family zoning district, each of which has a maximum density of 3 units/acre or less. In the general area of the project site, most L-1 properties with residential uses are zoned RS -3. Since the land use designation controls the use of the property by limiting the zoning districts applicable to the property, any rezoning must be compatible with the uses and densities allowed by the property's land use designation. Once a specific PD rezoning is approved for a site, the applicable PD conceptual plan adopted as part of the rezoning will limit the type of specific uses and the densities allowed on the subject site. The conceptual plan will also establish the dimensional criteria applicable to the site. Although PD zoning district parameters are flexible, certain standards related to uses, compatibility (buffering), infrastructure improvements, dimensional criteria, and open space areas are set forth in Chapter 915 (P.D. Process and Standards for Development Ordinance) of the county's land development regulations (LDRs). The proposed PD district for the subject site establishes separate standards for each of the 6 "villages" or pods comprising the project. Each of the villages contains a certain residential product type. The standards proposed for the individual villages are compared to the RS -3 zoning district standards in the chart below. WAIVERS REQUESTED Development ZONING Parameters/Waivers RS -3 Proposed PD Previous Application Village A (Duple:) - Minimum Lot Size 12,000 sq. ft. 5,625 sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. - Minimum Lot Width 80 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. - Minimum Yard Setbacks .From 25 R 25 ft. 20 ft. -Rear 25 ft. 25 ft 25 ft. -Side 15 ft. 15 ft. / Party Wall* 0 R - Side for Accessory Structure 15 R is ft. 0 ft. - Minimum Open Space 40% 400/6 20% - Density up to 3 units/acre 3.71 unitstacre 4.04 unitstacre January 11, 2000 30 WAIVERS REQUESTED Development ZONING Parameters/Waivers RS -3 Proposed PD Previous Application Village B & D (Single -Family) 12,000 sq. ft. 8,125 sq. R 6,250 sq. ft. - Minimum Lot Size 80 ft. 65 ft. 50 ft. - Minimum Lot Width - Minimum Yard Setbacks 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 & 25 ft. 25 & -Front 15 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft. -Rear 15 ft. 15 ft. 5 ft. -Side 40% 400/c 200/c - Side for Accessory Structure - Minimum Open Space up to 3 units/acre 2.15 units/acre (Pod B) 3.06 units/acre (Pod B) -Density 3.06 units/acre (Pod D) 3.3 units/acre (Pod D) Village C (Single -Family) - Minimum Lot Size 12,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. R 9,375 sq. R - Minimum Lot Width 80 ft. 80 ft. 75 ft. - Minimum Yard Setbacks 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. -Front 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. -Rear 15 ft. IS R 20 ft. -Side 15 ft. 15 R 5 R - Side for Accessory Structure 400/a 40% 20% - Minimum Open Space up to 3 units/acre 2.20 unitstacre 2.58 units/acre - Density Village E (Single -Family) - Minimum Lot Size 12,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 8,125 sq. ft. - Minimum Lot Width 80 R 80 ft. 75 ft. - Minimum Yard Setbacks -Front 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 R 25 ft. 25 ft. -Rear 15 R 15 R 7.5 ft. -Side I S ft. 15 ft 15 ft - Side for Accessory Structure 2. - Minimum Open Space up to 3 units/acre up t 2.06 units/acre 2. 6 2 36 units/acre 6 - Density Village F (Single -Family) - Minimum Lot Size 12,000 sq. & 6,250 sq. ft. 6,250 sq. & - Minimum Lot Width 80 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. - Minimum Yard Setbacks -Front 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 R -Rear 15 & 5 R 5 R -Side 15 & 15 ft. 5 ft. - Side for Accessory Structure 40% 40 /0 20% - Minimum Open Space up to 3 units/acre 233 unitstacre 2.73 units/acre - Density * zero lot line Note: Where no waivers are requested, all size, dimensional criteria and setbacks will need to meet the RS -3 zoning criteria January 11, 2000 31 BOOK Ut G.�� r � BOOK G�ny� Note: While the density for some Villages is over 3 units per acre, the overall project density is 2.49 units per acre. Thus, the project is under the RS -3 and L-1 density limits. Note: Pools, patios, decks, and enclosures must be set back at least 10 feet from a perimeter property line for single-family homes. Generally, the applicant is asking for fewer and less significant setback waivers from the RS - 3 zoning district requirements with the current application than were requested in the previous application. In addition, the lot sizes now requested do not deviate from the RS -3 standards as much as those requested in the previous application. In the past, the County has requested a statement of "benefits" that the county will receive in return for granting requested PD waivers. In the case of the Citrus Springs proposal, "benefits" would include: a variety of residential product type, a coordinated and extensive pedestrian system, integration of accessory commercial with internal recreational amenities, and mitigating buffers. RS -3 District PROPOSED PD RS -3 District Single -Family detached, accessory dwelling Same as RS -3, except multi -family units and units, places of worship, etc. as listed in section accessory commercial would be allowed in 911.07. accordance with PD regulations. Commercial uses would be regulated by section 915.12 and limited to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) type uses. It should be noted that, if the PD rezoning is approved, the approved conceptual plan will be included as an actual exhibit to the rezoning ordinance. Additional items which are controlled by the conceptual plan include buffering, certain design improvements, and the overall subdivision layout. The subject site consists mostly of active citrus, although some of the groves have been removed The site is generally northeast of the 581 Avenue/9th Street SW intersection, with frontage on 91h Street SW, 58°h Avenue, and 5th Street SW. The overall project site is "split" by 5th Street SW. To the north of the subject site is the South Relief Canal (250' of right-of-way) and then Hammock Lakes PD Phase I and an existing grove which is proposed as Hammock Lakes PD Phase II. All of the adjacent properties to the north are zoned RS -3. To the east, all of the adjacent properties are in citrus and are zoned RS -3. South of the subject site, across 9th Street SW, there is one home with the remainder in groves. All of the property is zoned RS -3, with a portion at the west end (near 58th Avenue) zoned A -1 - January 11, 2000 32 West of the subject site, across 58t° Avenue and south of 51 Street SW, the property is all in citrus and zoned A-1. North of 51 Street SW, there is a plant nursery and Emmanuel Baptist Church, both of which are zoned A-1. There is a t 10 acre parcel and a 25.7 acre parcel located between the project site and the 58' Avenue/9th Street SW intersection. Those parcels are zoned A-1. As is standard for PDs, the development will have a minimum 25' setback from all perimeter property lines. There will be some perimeter buffering including agricultural buffers where the project is adjacent to active agricultural operations. • Future Land Use Map Pattern The subject property has an L-1 land use plan designation as do the properties to the north, east, and south. The property to the west, across 58* Avenue, is outside the urban service area and has an AG - 1 land use designation (Agricultural 1, up to 1 unit per 5 acres). The 10 acre and 25.7 acre parcels lying between the southwest comer of the project and 58* Avenue also have an L-1 land use designation. • Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with the policies of the comprehensive plan and must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. Consistency with goals, objectives, and policies is also essential. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives. Future Land Use Policies 5.3 and 5.4 Policy 5.3: Indian River county zoning districts shall permit a variety of residential building and development styles. Policy 5.4: Indian River County LDRs shall contain a special Planned Development (PD) zoning district. That district shall be designated as an overlay on the County Zoning Atlas. The PD zoning district is intended to provide for the development of projects which require flexibility in order to maximize open space and conserve natural features, provide alternative designs, incorporate recreational facilities, and incorporate a mix of uses. The proposed PD is consistent with these policies in that the PD plan proposes a variety of residential product types in a design that exceeds open space minimums and buffers project perimeters. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-1, Low Density Residential 1, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area. January 11, 2000 33 GOOK �,%L k. ? aj Because the subject property is located within an area designated as L-1 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district provides for residential uses less than 3 units/acre in accordance with the L-1 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12. While the referenced policies and objectives are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan. Based on population projections and current development patterns, residential development in this area of the county is expected to increase and eventually become the dominant land use. Since the project area is located within the Urban Service Area and is designated for low-density residential development, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. • Compatibility Immediate Area There are three parcels that are adjacent to the development that will be impacted by the development. These parcels include the 10 acre area (contains 2 homes) at the northeast comer of the 58t' Avenue/9th Street SW intersection, the 25.7 acre parcel immediately east of that 10 acre parcel on 9' Street SW, and a .69 acre parcel with an existing home on 5th Street SW which forms an enclave "within" the development. Compared to the previous proposal, the current proposal reduces the development's impact on the 10 acre parcel by eliminating development immediately east of that parcel and by creating lake frontage for the other perimeters of the 10 acre parcel. The 25.7 acre "not -included" parcel should not be impacted greatly because it is vacant land. The greatest impact will be on the .69 acre enclave property which has the project's most intense detached single-family product type proposed adjacent to it. Staff recommends that the lots proposed adjacent to the .69 acre enclave parcel meet the minimum 12,000 sq. ft. lot size RS -3 zoning district criteria along with a Type "C" buffer, or be protected by a Type "B" buffer with 6' opaque feature. General Area The site is located near the intersection of two arterial roads (Oslo and 58th Avenue), with the property to the north, east and south lying within the urban service area. The property to the west, across 58te Avenue, lies outside the urban service area. At the present time, the area surrounding the proposed project site is sparsely developed. Staffs approach regarding compatibility for PDs, including this project, is to concentrate on perimeter uses, intensities, buffers and setbacks to ensure an adequate transition from adjacent properties. Staffs analysis assumes that adjacent properties Will develop with conventional zoning district lot sizes. In the case of Citrus Springs, staff assumes RS -3 development with 12,000 sq. R lots on adjacent property and the compatibility measures necessary to buffer such future "conventional" lots from Citrus Springs. The greater the deviation from conventional zoning standards, the greater the buffer and setback and transitional area staff has tried to achieve through the design review process. In staffs opinion, the buffers and setbacks recommended by staff ensure the compatibility of this project design and PD rezoning with the overall area and surrounding properties. January 11, 2000 34 • a Environmental Impacts and Concurrency These issues will be analyzed in the PD plan analysis. ■ PD Plan Analysis 1. Size: 2. Zoning Classifications: Current: Proposed: 3. Land Use Designation: 4. Density: 5. Lot Size 191.64 acres A-1, Agricultural (1 units/5 acres) RS -3, Residential Single -Family (up to 3 units/acre) PD, Planned Development (up to 3 units/acre) L-1, Low Density 1 (up to 3 units/acre) 477 units on 191.64 acres = 2.49 units/acre A-1 Minimum 200,000 sq. ft. RS -3 Minimum 12,000 sq. ft. Ranges Proposed 5,625 - 16,000 sq. ft. 6. Open Space: Required: 40% Provided: 59.3% (creditable green and lake open space) Note. The project's open space is provided in a combination of community open space and open space on each residential lot (40% minimum open space on each individual lot). Of the 113.72 acres of provided open space, 90.81 acres are green space, and 22.91 acres are creditable lake area. 7. Recreation Area: Required: 5.72 acres Provided: 8.48 acres Note: The recreation area is provided via a clubhouse recreation complex, pedestrian walkways (sidewalks and jogging trails), parks, and lakeside areas. 8. Phasing: The applicant is proposing to construct the development in two phases. Phase I will consist of Villages A. B, and C (218 units), which are located north of 5' Street SW, and the recreation complex, which is located south of 5' Street SW. Phase II is located south of 51 Street SW and consists of Villages D, E, and F (259 units). Each phase will be able to "stand alone" in regard to access and infrastructure improvements such as water, sewer, stormwater management, road paving, and other required improvements. 9. Environmental Issues: • Uplands: Since the site is over 5 acres, the native upland set-aside requirement of LDR section 929.05 could potentially apply. However, the existing site consists entirely of groves or pasture; therefore, no upland set- aside is required. January 11, 2000 35 L!VUf1h1i nuL r • BOOK 1.11 muG Wetlands: Environmental planning staff indicates that there is not a high probability of any wetlands on-site, given that the entire site was citrus. Detailed environmental information will be required during the preliminary PD plan review process. If any wetland area are identified at that time, the appropriate regulations will be applied, and a corresponding re -design will be done (if necessary). 10. Concurrency Management: Long-range planning staff has indicated that a conditional concurrency certificate will be issued for this project prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission's consideration of this item. Thus, all concurrency requirements related to conceptual PD plan and rezoning approval have been satisfied. 11. Stormwater Management: As with standard single-family subdivisions, a conceptual stormwater management plan is required prior to conceptual PD plan approval. For this project, a conceptual stormwater management plan has been approved by the Public Works Department. This plan includes a system of stormwater ponds. Final review and approval of the stormwater management plan shall be accomplished through the land development permit process. The overall lake area has been reduced from 86.9 acres to 76.66 acres. 12. Thoroughfare Plan: The Thoroughfare Plan classifies 9'h Street SW as a major arterial roadway which requires an ultimate right-of-way of 130'. Presently, 120' of right-of-way exists for 9'h Street SW. The proposed conceptual plan accommodates the additional 10' of right-of-way needed from this site to achieve the ultimate right-of-way. The Thoroughfare Plan classifies 51 Street SW as a collector road requiring 80' of road right-of-way. Presently, 30' of road right-of-way exists. The applicant will need to dedicate an additional 30' without compensation to create the local road minimum of 60'. Also, the county is negotiating to purchase an additional 20' of right-of-way to complete the 80' of ultimate road right-of-way for 5'h Street SW. The 20' acquisition will take place outside of the development review process. The plan does accommodate all 50' of additional road right-of-way needed for 5'h Street SW. The Thoroughfare Plan classifies 58th Avenue as an arterial roadway that requires an ultimate right-of-way of 130'. No additional right-of-way is required for the project site, due to the location of the Indian River Farms Water Control District Lateral B Canal along the east side of 581 Avenue. 13. Traffic Circulation: The project will be accessed from 91 Street SW and 5'h Street SW. For the portion of the development between 91 Street SW and 5'h Street SW, a main entry road will run from 91 Street SW to 5'h Street SW. Individual "villages" will access the main entry road, which will be dedicated to the public. January 11, 2000 36 _I The project entry north of 5" Street SW will align with the proposed main entry road to the south. The north area entrance road will branch out to provide access to the three_ Villages located north of 51" Street SW. A traffic impact analysis has been reviewed by Traffic Engineering. The review of that analysis indicates that the following improvements are required to mitigate project traffic impacts: Westbound right -tum lane on 91 Street SW at the project's 9'" Street SW entrance 2. West bound left -tum lane on 51 Street SW at the project's 5'" Street SW entrance. 3. Eastbound left -turn lane on 51 Street SW at the project's 5' Street SW entrance. 4. Southbound left -tum lane on 581 Avenue (King's Hwy) at 5'" Street SW/58th Avenue intersection. 5. Three lane bridge over the Lateral B Canal to connect 5' Street SW to 581 Avenue intersection. 6. Paving 5' Street SW from 58' Avenue to 431 Avenue. A southbound right -tum lane on 27" Avenue at its intersection with 8'" Street. Note. This is the same list of required improvements identified for the previous development proposal. A developer's agreement will control the timing of these and other required improvements. This developer's agreement will need to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the issuance of a land development permit. 14. Utilities: Connection to public water and wastewater services is mandatory. These utility provisions have been approved by the Health Department and the County Utility Services Department. The applicant will be extending both county water and sewer lines to the site pursuant to a separate developer's agreement with the Department of Utility Services. The utilities developer's agreement will need to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the issuance of a land development permit. 15. Dedications and Improvements: Sidewalks: A 5' public sidewalk is required to be constructed along the site's 9' Street SW and 51" Street SW frontages (north side of each street frontage). The sidewalks are shown on the conceptual plan and will need to be constructed in conjunction with the appropriate development phase. Paving of 5" Street SW.- 5'" Street SW must be paved from 431d Avenue to 581" Avenue. The timing and any county contribution for such paving will be part of the developer's agreement that will require Board of County Commissioners approval. January 11, 2000 37 BOOK Ili FAQ E G - A Bridge at Su Street SW and 5e Avenue: The applicant is responsible for constructing the bridge over the Lateral B Canal. The developer's agreement will set the timing and amount of any county contribution. Emergency Access and Pedestrian Access: Emergency access and pedestrian access points will be provided in Villages A and D and will provide emergency and pedestrian access to Th Street SW. These connections have been conceptually approved by Emergency Services and Public Works, and will be constructed in the appropriate phases. The applicant will need to obtain approval of Emergency Services and Public Works for detailed designs of the emergency access points. Said details will be reviewed under the appropriate land development permit applications. Proposed PD Waivers: The proposed waivers available through the PD process are discussed in the PD zoning analysis section of this staff report. Please reference that section for waivers proposed by the developer. Pedestrian Circulation: The applicant has submitted an approvable internal pedestrian circulation plan which provides for the emergency access points to function as pedestrian accesses. The pedestrian plan consists of sidewalks on both sides of all internal streets, a sidewalk along the west side of the main north/south road and a path connecting the two cul-de-sacs in Village B. The sidewalks will be constructed with the respective phases. Ultimately, the pedestrian system will contain over 2.6 miles of perimeter paths and 1 mile of sidewalk along the main roadway with additional sidewalks internal to the Villages. Indian River Farms Water Control District Access Easement and Landscape Easement: Along the project's western property line, the applicant is proposing to grant the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD) a 25 foot wide access easement for maintenance of the north/south Lateral B Canal. This maintenance easement is desirable, but is not consistent with the landscape buffers shown on the proposed conceptual plan. Therefore, a 10' wide landscape easement will need to be established along 581h Avenue south of P Street SW immediately east of the 25' access easement to support the required Type "C" buffer plantings; north of 5t6 Street SW, a 50' wide landscape easement will need to be established east of the IRFWCD's 25' maintenance easement to support the recommended 50' wide Type "B" buffer. Both easements will need to be established via the final plat. Accessory Commercial. • The applicant is proposing a maximum build -out of 9,580 sq. R of accessory commercial building area. This is allowed based on the criteria of PD section 915:12. The proposed design meets the criteria, which are attached. In staffs opinion, the location of the accessory commercial away from the project perimeter, and in conjunction with the project clubhouse and main north/south road, is acceptable. Current plans propose a typical retail building "rear end" facing proposed project residences. To mitigate the negative impacts of this design, a screening wall and intervening internal local road will be placed between the building's "rear end" and the adjacent project residences. Road Names: The applicant is requesting the use of named roads rather than numbered roads which fit into the county's street number grid system. Staff has denied this request, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has upheld the staffs January 11, 2000 38 • action. The Board of County Commissioners should also deny this request because the applicant meets none of the LDR criteria that would exempt the project from using street numbers. These criteria are as follows: (4) Named roads: (a) The requirement of number designations for roads in the unincorporated county shall not apply to named roads established prior to the date of this chapter. (b) All new roads established in the unincorporated county shall be issued a number designation in conformance with the grid pattern as described herein, with the following exceptions: 1. Continuations of existing, named roads (roads with name designations only), or 2. Roads on the barrier island, or 3. Private roads within a planned development or a private subdivision that do not fit into the county's existing grid system of east -west and north -south roads. At the time of development plan application, staff shall apply these criteria in its review of requests for use of road names. Staff determinations shall be final unless appealed pursuant to the provisions of 951.09(2). The applicant is not continuing a named road pattern, and the project is not on the barrier island. The roads within the subdivision can easily fit into the county's overall roadway numbering system, such as was done in the Hammock Lake Estates and Cypress Lake PDs located north of this project. Therefore, the applicant should be required to meet the LDR requirements and use the street numbers, such as 541 Avenue and 531 Avenue, which have been assigned to the project by planning staff. Landscape and Buffering. West Side Village A (Multi -Family) OLD APPLICATION A 50' wide buffer with a 75' setback was proposed along the west side of Village A (multi -family), where Village A abuts Lateral B Canal and 581 Avenue. The buffer was proposed to be a Type "B" with a 6 opaque feature. NEW APPLICATION January 11, 2000 The applicant is now proposing a 25' setback and a Type "C" buffer with a 6' opaque feature along the west side of Village "A" (duplexes). Staff recommends that the previous 50' wide Type "B" buffer with a 6' berm and 75' building setback be established to provide an effective buffer. km BOOK 11.E PAGE 8�' • rT r BOOK ill PAGE North Side of Su' Street SW OLD APPLICATION A 25' setback from the 80' Thoroughfare Plan right-of-way to any hard I surface, such as pavement was required and was depicted. In addition, a Type "B" buffer was proposed to be provided adjacent to the area where the multi -family units were proposed and a Type "D" buffer along the remainder where single-family units were proposed. NEW APPLICATION The applicant is proposing a Type "D" buffer along the project's entire 51' Stmt SW frontage. The staff believes that the Type "D" buffer is adequate. South Side of P Street SW OLD APPLICATION A 25' setback is required and a Type "D" buffer was proposed where units were adjacent to 5'" Street SW. NEW APPLICATION The applicant has proposed a Type "D" buffer. East Side of Village C (Single -Family) OLD APPLICATION An agricultural buffer was required and depicted along the east property line of Village "C" since an active grove is adjacent to the project. The buffer was to consist of a 25' wide Type "B" buffer. The buffer was to be constructed along with the land development improvements for Village C. NEW APPLICATION The applicant has proposed the same type of buffer as previously proposed. North project perimeter adjacent to South Relief Canal OLD APPLICATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended a Type "C" buffer with a 6' opaque feature adjacent to the multi -family area and a Type "D" buffer for the remainder. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission requested this be a condition of approval. NEW APPLICATION January 11, 2000 The applicant has proposed the same type of buffer as previously proposed, which is consistent with the buffers recommended above. 40 East Side of Village G (Single -Family) OLD APPLICATION An agricultural buffer is required and was depicted along the east property line of Village "G", since an active grove is adjacent to the project. The buffer would need to consist of a 25' wide Type "B" buffer. The buffer was to be constructed along with the land development improvements for Village G. In addition, a 75' setback would be provided along the east side of Village G. NEW APPLICATION Village G is now labeled as Village F. The same type of buffer and setback are proposed along the project's east property line. Not -Included Parcel OLD APPLICATION There is a not -included parcel fronting on 5te Street SW at the north end of Village G (now Village F). Around that parcel, a 25' setback and a Type "C" buffer was to be provided on the development site. The buffer was to be constructed with the Village G (now Village F) subdivision improvements. NEW APPLICATION A Type "C" buffer is proposed by the applicant. Based upon public hearing input from the residents of affected parcel, this buffer should be upgraded to a Type "B" with a 6' opaque feature, or RS -3 sized parcels should be established around this not -included parcel. South End of the New Village F (previously Village G) (Single -Family) OLD APPLICATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the Type "D" buffer on a 3' berm be increased to a Type "B" buffer on a 3' berm. Staff concurred with this recommendation. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission requested that this be a condition of approval. NEW APPLICATION January 11, 2000 The plan proposes a Type "C" buffer with a 6' opaque feature. Staff continues to recommend a Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature. 41 11 HOK 1 _1 f n kll3 A- Double Frontage Buffers OLD APPLICATION Double frontage buffers were required internal to the project at any place that a unit had a back or side yard that fronted a road. The applicant depicted the buffer locations on the plan, along the appropriate segments of the main north/south road. The buffers were to be in accordance with section 913.09(6)(C)5 and would have to have been provided with the subdivision improvements for the respective phase. NEW APPLICATION The applicant has proposed the same type of buffer as previously proposed, which is consistent with staff's recommendation. South and West Side of old Village F (Multi -Family) OLD APPLICATION Along the perimeter of the old Village F, a 50' wide Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature was required. In addition, a 75' building setback was proposed by the applicant to provide a measure of compatibility. The multi- family units would be limited to 1 and 2 story combinations with a maximum of 3 units attached. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended extending this buffer up to Village D along the lake area between the two villages. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission requested that this be a condition of approval. NEW APPLICATION The old Village F along 91" Street SW has been deleted from this plan. The project's south perimeter for the area west of the main access road off Oslo is now located on the south side of Village E, where a Type "C" buffer with a 6' opaque feature is proposed. This includes the west and north frontage of the 10 acre out -parcel. In staff's opinion, this buffer is acceptable. West Side of Village D (Single -Family) OLD APPLICATION January 11, 2000 The west side of Village D is adjacent to the Lateral B Canal and 581h Avenue. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this buffer be increased from a Type `C" with a 6 feature to a Type "B" with a 6' feature. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission requested that this be made a condition of approval. 42 0 NEW APPLICATION A Type "C" buffer is proposed with a 6' high opaque feature.- In staff's opinion, this is an adequate buffer, since the lot widths have changed from 50' wide to 65' wide, which lessons the degree of deviation from the RS -3 minimum 80' lot width requirement. Subject to recommended conditions, the requested PD rezoning and corresponding conceptual PD plan are generally compatible with the surrounding area, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, meet all concurrency requirements, and are consistent with the site's L-1, (Low Density 1 up to 3 units/acre), land use designation. The subject property is suitable for residential development given its future land use map designation and its proximity and direct access to 91 Street SW and 5* Street SW. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approval of the PD rezoning request and the PD conceptual plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall use road numbers in accordance with LDR Chapter 951 standards, and 2. The applicant shall revise the conceptual plan to increase the lot sizes or provide a Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature adjacent to the enclave parcel, and 3. The applicant shall revise the conceptual plan to reflect the buffer upgrades as referenced in the staff report, and 4. Via the final plat(s) or an acceptable off -plat dedication, the applicant shall dedicate without compensation 30' of right-of-way for 5t' Street SW. 5. Via the final plat(s) or an acceptable off -plat dedication, the applicant shall establish a 25' wide canal maintenance easement along the project's west property line and a 10' maintenance landscape easement immediately east of the canal maintenance easement, south of 51 Street SW. North of 5 'Street SW, a 50' wide landscape easement needs to be provided east of the canal maintenance easement. 6. Prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the applicant shall: a. Apply for and obtain preliminary PD plan approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission, and b. Obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of a developer's agreement regarding provision of water and sewer utility improvements, and C. Obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of a developer's agreement regarding the required off-site traffic -related improvements. January 11, 2000 1191 • boor UL Gam` i 7. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for any respective project phase or village, the applicant shall: a. Construct required buffers as described in the landscape and buffering section of this report, including the upgrades recommended by staff, and b. Construct or bond -out off-site sidewalks (9s' Street SW and 5th Street SW) that are required for that project phase or village, and C. Construct any off-site roadway improvements required for that phase or village, in accordance with an approved developer's agreement, and d. Construct any off-site utility improvements required for that project phase or village, in accordance with an approved Utility Services developer's agreement. 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes 4. Old Conceptual Plan 5. Density Comparisons 6. Ordinance 7. Conceptual Pedestrian PD Plan (11 x 17 Folded) 8. Typical Streetscape Plan (11 x 17 Folded) Planning Director Stan Boling stressed that this is a request for a conceptual PD plan approval. He reviewed the memorandum in depth with the aid of a location map from the backup (page 61). He pointed out the differences in Suntree's previous application and reviewed the required road and traffic improvements. He reviewed the layout information and buffering requirements for each of the planned 'villages" and described the neighborhood commercial area, recreation center and open space requirements which have been met for the whole project and each of the parts. He advised that the developer had requested that the roads be named rather than numbered; however, the Planning & Zoning Commission and staff had recommended against that. He fully reviewed staff's recommendation and detailed each of the conditions. January 11, 2000 0 0 • Director Boling responded to questions of the Commissioners concerning specifics on the recommendations, buffers, the enclave, and types of natural features which might be present (none) and need to be protected. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Glenn Legwen, whose 5 -acre property is on the comer of 5' Street SW and 58' Avenue, voiced his concerns about the bridge across the canal, potable water and sewer infrastructure, lack of sufficient pocket passive county parks for the public, whether the developer will have to pay for the bridge, and whether there will be a traffic light at the intersection. Chairman Adams pointed out that the matter before them today is the consideration of their conceptual PD and that some of Mr. Legwen's concerns are generally addressed later in the process. Director Boling advised that there are parks included within the project and extensive walking and jogging paths around and through the project. The bridge will be under the aegis of the Public Works Department and will be covered via traffic impact fees, and a Developer's Agreement that will require Board approval. Public Works Director James W. Davis stated that he envisioned a developer's agreement with the developer and the County to cost -share for the road paving and the bridge. Chairman Adams added that there will be a separate developer's agreement for the utilities. Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Boulevard, spoke as attorney for the applicant. He reviewed the request and pointed out that his client was here today for conceptual PD plan January 11, 2000 C,R • HOK PAGE f . approval. He reviewed the usage and the zoning and advised that all buffers will be installed as required. He stated that the enclave owner, Payson, has written a letter agreeing to the project. He stated that there was a slight disagreement on the naming of the streets. He gave examples of how numbered streets (complying with the County's grid system) within the project would be very confusing and requested that the developer be permitted to use names to designate the streets rather than numbers. He reviewed how the proposed conceptual PD plan agrees with Objective 5 in the Future Land Use Element and stressed the location is within the urban service area on major thoroughfares. He reviewed the properties along the perimeter of the development area and indicated that most of the immediate neighbors are in support of the project. John Haley, President of Suntree Partners, the applicant, pointed out how this proposed project differs from the previously submitted projects and how it has been improved significantly. They have reduced the density and increased the open space and usable green space. They have added a "pedway", parks and sidewalks. He reviewed each village, giving the projected intended users and the types of home and lifestyle that would be furnished in each of the villages. The recreation center will be completed with the completion of Villages A, B & C. There will also be a soccer field and school bus turnarounds will be provided. He thought this to be a very good project for Vero Beach and Indian River County and urged the Board's support. Susan Cobb, 5920 5' Street SW, was concerned about the impact of quantity versus quality. She was also concerned about the increase of traffic and noise. She stated that 58'h Avenue is only 1/6th completed and we are still another five years from completion. She suggested the developer hold off until the 58t` Avenue improvements have been completed. Roy Hirschfeld, 4055 12'h Street SW, presented handouts and petitions to the Commissioners and stated this was an inappropriate zoning request for the neighborhood. January 11, 2000 ER K He displayed photographs of examples of dense housing, commenting that the lots are too small. He felt that the project represents a significant departure in character from that of the existing, surrounding neighborhoods. He spoke at length about the effect on the area and urged the Board not to approve the request. (CLERK'S NOTE: Mr. Hirschfeld's handout and petitions are on file with the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) Chairman Adams asked that Mr. Hirschfeld's concerns be addressed by staff. Director Boling described the calculations for density in detail. He also addressed the compatibility concerns, growth management impact, and density comparisons. In response to Vice Chairman Grin's inquiry about a traffic analysis, Community Development Director Robert M. Keating responded that the applicant did a traffic analysis and it has been reviewed by traffic engineering. At build out, traffic will operate adequately and most of the traffic will impact 58th Avenue from Oslo Road to 4' Street. He also furnished the predicted numbers of trips at peak time. The traffic analysis was revised and updated to reflect the new application. Hurley Rountree, 6566 1' Street SW, lives adjacent to the project and favors it. Bea Gardner requested information on time restrictions for a once denied applicant to reapply. County Attorney Vitunac explained the requirements and in this instance there has been a substantial change in the request and 27 acres have been removed from the previous plan. Harold Brooks, an adjacent resident/property owner, had five points to make to the Board. First, the land as it is now looks terrible and has lots of snakes. Second, he believed in the honesty, enthusiasm and money of John Haley. Third, he compared the concept with Seaside in 1980, which had beach cottages in a village idea, and Shady Oaks, which has no recreation nor open space as this development plan projects. Fourth, he envisioned this as January 11, 2000 47 EOG I FAUN + 1.i I BOOK I,r c. (S a small community with its BMWs and walking trail. Fifth, Mr. Hirschfeld has the only CBS house in his area and it stands out among all the wood houses. He cited an article in the Miami Herald concerning "product diversity" in the housing market and the noticeable changes which have developed. In addition, he commented that Ms. Cobb has a house on 2-1/2 acres and the lot should be 5 acres. He concluded by saying that the proposal was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and urged the Commission to approve it. At 10:55 a.m., the Chairman called a brief recess. Meeting was reconvened at approximately 11:05 a.m. with all members present. The Chairman resumed the public hearing on 9.A.2. Robert P. Barnett, 113 39' Drive, stated that Suntree has a highly successful, large development 10 miles from Melbourne. He was pleased with the proposed development and pointed out it would increase the tax base. Patsy Helseth stated that her family wholeheartedly supports the developer's plan and believed he had made very generous concessions. She predicted it will be a quality development and an enhancement of the area. She asked the Board to vote "yes". GeoffProfeta, 3550 3' Place SW, spoke against the development and speculated that it would be expanded with the Arnsmeier and Jones properties, plus the additional 27 acres, in the future. John Petterson, 1135 40' Avenue SW, was opposed to this development but not opposed to development in general. As a resident of Shady Oaks he was concerned about increased traffic and stress in the area and that takes would increase. He asked the Board to deny the request. Lex Strumhold, 4150 11' Place SW, opposed the development and was concerned that 58' Avenue traffic would be like SR 7 in Palm Beach County at Hypoluxo Road. January 11, 2000 48 Fred Weinkauff, 230 44' Terrace SW, was opposed to the development plan and asked the Board to reject it. Patricia Gibson, 494511` Place SW, was opposed and cited concerns with too many homes in too small an area and increased traffic. Bill Terry, 4210 12' Street SW, a resident of Shady Oaks, was opposed to the request. He stated that he had moved from Palm Beach County and envisioned a similar influx in this area due to the high density of this concept. Brian Heady, Vero Beach, spoke in opposition to the request and stated the Board had no obligation to enrich developers. He criticized the Chairman for requesting no applause to speakers' comments. The Board should consider owners' rights who purchased their property because they believed in the integrity of the zoning. He believed the employment opportunities in Indian River County for people who lived in this development did not exist. He was concerned that by continuing with this type of development, the quality of life in Indian River County will be diminished. Ellen Arnsmeier, 5768 9'h Street SW, advised that Mr. And Mrs. Jones were not able to come to the meeting. She spoke on their behalf also in endorsing this development which will be directly adjacent to their properties. She pointed out the petition signers live far from the development area. She preferred to see a development with amenities as opposed to individual single family homes. She endorsed this above-average development as a welcome addition to the area. Peter Robinson supported the Chairman's earlier request for no applause; he appreciated not having that occur. Denise Shaw, 415 43' Avenue SW, was concerned this development and the area will become like Port St. Lucie. She asked if the school system was ready for this influx of people. She suggested the Board give the county a chance to catch up. January 11, 2000 49 Fr- -1 600K Tim Zorc, 3907 58'h Circle, complained that homeowners in Hammock Lakes were not informed about this hearing. He had received notice Monday, January 10', which was sent out on December 31' . He inquired about the property owners within 300' notification requirement. Director Boling responded thatproperty owners within 300' and beyond were notified and the notices for this meeting were mailed on January 3'. Mr. Zorc continued that the County should have gotten more involvement from the neighbors. He inquired about specifics on the calculation of the open areas, which Director Boling detailed for him. While he did not favor this project, he did favor permitting a community to name its inner streets rather than have to use numbered designations. He found the grid numbering assignments confusing. He offered that Vero Beach is unique and thought a 50' lot will not work here. He predicted that other developers will mirror this project and its use of attached products. Other developers have been able to fill a niche for a larger size product. Mr. Hirschfeld inquired about the abutting properties and the procedural legality of this hearing. County Attorney Vitunac explained that the item had received subjective analyzation by professional staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission and now it is before the elected officials. Their decision either way will be sustainable. This is a legislative procedure, not quasi-judicial. The Board can make a decision either way and their decision cannot be challenged, in his opinion. Enough evidence has been presented for the record to find that this is a legal proceeding. Mr. Hirschfeld stated that 90% of the Hammock Lakes owners objected to the project on his petition. He felt it would have been 100% had he been able to contact all of them. He then read a letter into the record from Patricia Mozel containing her objections and January 11, 2000 0 0 • request that the Board vote "no". He also read a letter which he stated was from Fred Cole which also urged the Board to vote "no" against the rezoning. (CLERK'S NOTE: The letters have been placed in the backup file for the meeting in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) Mr. Haley came forward and presented "several hundred" names on letters in favor of the project for the record. (CLERK'S NOTE: These letters have been placed in the backup file for the meeting also.) In addition, he responded to questions concerning swimming pools which had come up during the hearing. Guy Barber, 1678 Highlands Avenue, wished to present a different twist. His concerns were about taxes, sufficient schools, infrastructure, and that the investor could turn the development into rentals. Mr. Profeta added another concern that the density would be visible from outside the project. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tippin believed he lived closer than some of the other folks who had signed the petition and yet he had not been approached to sign. He recalled when he first bought in his area how few neighbors there were and since that time some nice folks have moved to the area. Crime has not increased, but the property values have, and that has increased his taxes. He also explained why he favored street names rather than numbers, but understood that numbering was in accordance with the LDRs. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, to approve staff's recommendations with conditions set out in the memorandum January 11, 2000 51 BOOK i i i F',�U,E S5 except to use the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation for buffering on Village "D". Chairman Adams understood the motion to be that on Village "D" a Type `B" buffer with a 6' feature would be used. She offered a compromise on the street naming versus numbering issue, which was to assign a number (according to the grid) to the development's entry roads and allow a street name for each of the interior roadways within the developed area. THE MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge adding that the developer be permitted to assign street names for each of the interior roadways within the development area, but that the entry roadways to the development shall be numbered in. accordance with the grid system. Chairman Adams restated the motion indicating that conditions #1 and #3 in staff's recommendation had been changed as per the original motion and amendment. Under discussion, Vice Chairman Ginn didnot seehowthis planned developmentwas of benefit to the county. She pointed out that Pointe West was not included in the matrix. She advised she could not support the motion. Commissioner Macht understood the densities had been calculated according to a formula he stated, and Community Development Director Robert M. Keating stated he was correct, that this was a "gross" density rather than a "net" density. Commissioner Macht then asked when the improvements to 581 Avenue would be completed, and Public Works Director James W. Davis advised that Phase H is in the final stage of right-of-way acquisition and the engineering is nearing completion. Mr. Davis January 11, 2000 52 0 40 • hoped to begin Phase II construction sometime this year. He expects this phase's construction to go quicker than Phase I's and estimated it would take about a year. Commissioner Tippin added humorously thatthe Commissioners names should be left off the public road signs in the future, and Director Davis quipped that he would leave his off too. CommissionerMachtinquired when the 58'Avenue constructionwouldbe completed to Oslo Road, and Director Davis advised that Phase II goes from 16' Street all the way to Oslo Road. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried 4-1 (Vice Chairman Ginn opposed.) 9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - 35TH AVENUE RESIDENTS' PETITION REQUESTING 4 -WAY STOP SIGNS AND SPEED HUMPS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3, 2000: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator THRII: James W. Davis, P.E. "✓ Public Works Director ✓ FROM: Christopher R. Mora, P.E. County Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: 35th Avenue Residents' Petition Requesting 4 -Way STOP Signs and Speed Humps DATE: January 3, 2000 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa On December 14, 1999, the County received a petition (dated September 29, 1999) signed by 46 residents of 35`' Avenue. The January 11, 2000 53 • r e 8 BOOKFA'U'L ` < petition expressed traffic safety concerns along a residential section of 35th Avenue, between 12th and 8th Streets. In an effort to reduce the number of speeding vehicles, the residents requested the installation of 4 -way STOP signs at the intersection of 10" Street and 351h Avenue, as well as speed humps along 35th Avenue. The County Traffic Engineering Division conducted a traffic engineering study on 35th Avenue between 12" and 8th Streets. In response to the request for 4 -way STOP signs at the intersection of 10th Street and 35th Avenue, Traffic Engineering conducted traffic counts and reviewed the intersection crash history. The results of our analysis revealed that the current traffic counts (878 vehicles per day) and crash history (zero accidents in 5 years) do not warrant the placement of 4 -way STOP signs according to the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), the manual adopted by the State of Florida for determining the placement of all traffic control devices on the streets and highways of the state. In response to the request for speed humps along 35th Avenue, Traffic Engineering conducted a speed study and found that the average speed of vehicles using 35th Avenue was 35 mph. 35th Avenue has a posted speed limit of 30 mph. We have requested additional speed enforcement from the Sheriff's traffic unit. With regard to the installation of speed humps, the County has historically opposed the use of "active" speed reduction devices (speed bumps, speed humps, diverters, chokers, etc.) on County roadways because of their liability potential and the increased response time for emergency vehicles. In recent years however, some Florida cities and counties have experimented with speed humps, most with negative results. Traffic Engineering evaluated a speed hump installation in a nearby county and found that the humps reduce vehicle speeds only in a very limited distance from the hump, usually 100 to 120 feet. Motorists tend to speed up between the humps. To be effective in controlling vehicle speeds, the humps would need to be installed in a continuous series, every 300 feet. Therefore, to adequately cover one-half mile of 35th Avenue, a total of eight speed humps would need to be installed, at an estimated cost of $8,000. January 11, 2000 54 0 0 1 1. Emergency vehicles experience increased response times 2. Must be installed continuously to adequately control speeds 3. Difficult to properly construct 4. Difficult to maintain warning signs 5. Impact roadway drainage 6. Drivers often attempt to avoid by driving around them 7. May increase volumes on other streets 8. Create noise - particularly if there are loose items in the vehicle or trailer 9. Difficult to negotiate for certain vehicle/low trailer combinations (e.g. landscape, horse trailers) 1. Effective in reducing vehicle speeds in the vicinity of the hump 2. Self -enforcing 3. Relatively inexpensive compared with other traffic calming measures Staff recommends that no traffic control device changes be made to 35th Avenue between 12th and 8th Streets. Staff further recommends that increased enforcement of the existing 30 mph residential speed zone by the County Sheriff's traffic unit be continued. Traffic Engineering will continue to monitor the traffic conditions on 35th Avenue in the future as traffic demand and/or crash experience changes. Petition dated September 29, 1999 January 11, 2000 55 600 4 ••) .-> BOOK .� Pty.'UE ; Public Works Director James W. Davis advised that Chris Mora would be reviewing this matter for the Board. County Traffic Engineer Christopher R Mora reviewed the memorandum in detail and used drawings to illustrate the area where people want the speed humps. He advised that under the Uniform Traffic Control Devices manual, the area does not warrant the use of any traffic calming measures. The Sheriffs Office has been doing enhanced enforcement in the area to lessen the speeds and has installed their mobile speed indicator device to make people aware of the speed they are traveling. The speed humps have not been used in Indian River County but they can be seen in private areas. He displayed photographs of an area in North Palm Beach County showing speed humps as viewed ahead of an automobile and from the side of the road. People generally slow down for the speed humps and then return to their previous velocity. He concluded by reviewing the summary of disadvantages and advantages as set out in the memorandum and reviewed staffs recommendation. Betty Nottage, the Crime Watch Coordinator for the area, resides at 1040 35' Avenue. She has met with Mr. Mora and in spite of the recommendation against, they still need something in their neighborhood to slow down the vehicles on 35' Street. People are using 35' Street as a shortcut from SR60 to 8' Street. She inquired about the possibility of a traffic circle, advising that the residents will pay to maintain it if the County puts it in. She told of a nice roundabout at 29 h Avenue and 15'h Street. Chairman Adams suggested that staff look at the possibilities and costs of a roundabout. She stated that something of this nature comes down to enforcement and a mobile sign is inadequate. She asked that enforcement be stepped up and that staff come back with a plan and costs for a circle. Mrs. Nottage suggested they might use her area as a "pilot program". January 11, 2000 56 • MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, to request the Sheriff's Office to concentrate enforcement there and get some prices on the costs for a roundabout. Public Works Director James W. Davis estimated it would take about 60 days to put together the cost estimates. He wanted them to be aware that right-of-way would have to be acquired to make it work, how much would depend on the diameter. He thought a 15' diameter might work. He was concerned that if they were to move forward with doing a roundabout there, there will be additional requests from other areas, and they would have to start prioritizing the other existing road projects. He stressed that the cost per square foot will be greater since the area is not large enough to accommodate big equipment. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. 11.G. GIFFORD AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS - WORK ORDER NO. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL CIVIL SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT - CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3, 2000: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator /- THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director�� FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engineer' SUBJECT: Gifford Area Stormwater Improvements - ork Order No. 4 to the Professional Civil Services Master Agreement between Carter Associates, Inc. and Indian River County Florida DATE: January 3, 2000 January 11, 2000 57 • A,,ll (4yy A d ryppppp^1�> BOOK h! FADE L On August 4, 1998, at their regular meeting, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the Chairman to execute the Professional Civil Services Master Agreement, between Carter Associates, Inc. and Indian River County, for Stormwater Management Improvements. Attached is Work Order No. 4 for final design, permitting and construction plan preparation and related services for the Gifford Area Stormwater Improvements. Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Work Order No. 4 Funding to be from account no. 315-243-538-068.11. ATTACHMENTS 1. Work Order No. 4 to the Professional Civil Services Master Agreement between Carter Associates, Inc. and Indian River County 2. Exhibit A - Itemized Man -Hour Esimtate (supplied by Carter Associates, Inc.) 3. Proposal from G.K. Environmental, Inc. for state required mitigation work (supplied by Carter Associates, Inc.) 4. Proposal from Fraser Engineering and Testing, Inc. for geotechnical services (supplied by Carter Associates, Inc.) ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute Work Order No. 4 to the Professional Civil Services Master Agreement with Carter Associates, Inc., as recommended in the Memorandum. January 11, 2000 WORK ORDER NO.4 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TAE BOARD 58 11.H.1. EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT (FP&L) FOR THE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY - The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3, 2000: DATE: JANUARY 3, 2000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, E. � DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S I PREPARED JERE HAH IC JOHNSON, E.I. AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEE�/� BY: SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT (FP&L) FOR THE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY (WWTF) The Central Regional W WTF is currently under expansion to a total capacity of 2.0 Million Gallons per Day. Construction completion of the expansion is for late March 2000. ANALYSIS Since the expansion is on schedule, many aspects of the facility such as the electrical building and treatment structures are in place and ready for start-up testing. Power is required at these new facilities, specifically at the electrical building, which is located to the east of the current Florida Power and Light (FP&L) easement. FP&L will not supply the required power feed to this building without a new easement through County property. Thus, to keep the project on schedule, an easement is required for use by FP&L to install and maintain buried electric service to the W WTF site. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached easement release and grant Florida Power and Light access to the Central Regional WWTF site to install and maintain the required power service, and authorize the Chairman to execute the same. JKJ/jkj/sjd Attachments January 11, 2000 W 1 f' I�f� EUGK F'r�n UE:� r"-? - I mor f�k!ur_'.`1)?.0 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the easement release and granted Florida Power and Light access to the Central Regional WWTF site to install and maintain the required power service, and authorized the Chairman to execute the same, as recommended in the Memorandum. COPY OF RECORDED EASEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TAE BOARD 11.H.2. DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT - RIVER GROVE MOBILE HOME VILLAGE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3, 2000: DATE: JANUARY 3,20W TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, E.\ 7 \ 1 DIRECTOR OF U` TYdf ` SIFS18 PREPARED STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E., CAPITAL PROJI - GTS MANAGER _41 AND STAFFED JEREMIAH K. JOHNSON, E.I., ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, BY: SUBJECT: DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND RIVER GROVE MOBILE HOME VILLAGE BACKGROUND The Owners of RIVER GROVE MOBILE HOME VILLAGE desire to utilize the Central Residual Facility to dispose of residuals from the RIVER GROVE MOBILE HOME VILLAGE Wastewater Treatment Facility. Attached is an agreement for services to be provided by Indian River County Department of Utility Services for treatment and disposal of residuals. ANALYSIS The COUNTY operates and maintains a publicly owned Residuals Management Facility (Dewatering Facility) at the Central Regional WWTF, permit #FLA -010434001, which is capable of accepting domestic wastewater residual from outside sources. The facility has been given approval and is operating under Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit in compliance with Florida Administrative Code (FAC), Chapter 62- 640, to properly treat and dispose of domestic wastewater residuals. The CUSTOMER shall provide all transportation of residuals and will be charged the prevailing rates as shown on the Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates, Fees and Charges, attached to the Agreement. January 11, 2000 • REC�ENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement as presented, and authorize the Chairman to execute the same. Attachment MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, to approve staff's recommendation. Under discussion, Vice Chairman Ginn advised that she had no problem with this item, but thinks it is necessary to get information on the disposal of sledge which must be addressed in the future. Chairman Adams agreed and recalled the Board had tried to work that out a few years ago without success. Commissioner Stanbridge stated she was very surprised that she could not find a "no dumping" policy. County Attorney Vitunac advised that "spreading" is allowed. Commissioner Stanbridge asked that the matter be brought back with some recommendations, and Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs agreed to do so and advised that Glace and Radcliff are also looking at the options. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. January 11, 2000 AGREENlEr1T IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD 61 • a (P ,-1 BOOK I_�i [,�,G e,„; ji J BOOK 61" 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT None. U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are being prepared separately. U.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD None. There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 12:40 p.m. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Fran B. Adams, Chairman Minutes approved a®� January 11, 2000 62