HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/11/2000,4
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1)
Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman (District 5)
Kenneth R. Macht (District 3)
Ruth M. Stanbridge (District 2)
John W. Tippin (District 4)
9:00 a.m.
3
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. Caroline D. Ginn
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITIONS: 12. Partial Release of Utility Easements (Sebastian Highlands)
B.C. Discuss Addition of Cultural Element to Comprehensive Plan
DELETIONS: None.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation Honoring Lieutenant Wilbour D. Tripp on his
Retirement from Indian River County Employment on
April 28, 2000 1-2
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of March 7, 2000
B. Regular Meeting of March 14, 2000
BOOK M PAGE 01
r
rBOOK 113
PAGE 02
BACKUP
PAGES
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1) Public Notice from the City of Sebastian City
Council for a Quasi Judicial Public Hearing for
Wed., 4/12/00 at 7: 00 p.m., City Hall, 1225 Main
St., Sebastian to consider adopting a resolution
approving a preliminary plat forPublix Indian
River Subdivision located at the northwest corner
of Barber St., & US #1 (9.92 acre tract currently
CG [Commercial General])
2) Sebastian Inlet Tax District Commission Annual
Financial Report (CAFR) for 1998-99 FY, with
_ Proposed Meeting Schedule
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated March 30, 2000)
3-11
C. Modification to Agreement between City of Sebastian,
Indian River County, and Nelson Hyatt for Constructing
Improvements to Barber Street between FEC Railway and
U.S. 1.
(memorandum dated March 29, 2000) 12-16
D. Proclamation in support of "Celebration 2000" Fund-raiser
for the Coalition for the Homeless Thursday, May 18, 2000 17
E. Harold Christenson's Request for Extension of Site Plan
Approval for a Multi -Family Development to be known as
Santa Maria Apartments SP -MA -99-06-36 / 98100151
(memorandum dated April 5, 2000) 18-22
F. KSM Engineering and Testing, Inc.'s Request for Extension
of Site Plan Approval to Construct a Building and Outdoor
Vehicle Storage Area SP -MA -99-05-27 / 97050041
(memorandum dated April 5, 2000) 23-27
G. Board Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost -Share
Agreement Extensions/Addenda for the Round Island South
and Wabasso Scrub Addition LAAC Sites
(memorandum dated April 5, 2000) 28-34
H. Beazer Homes Request for Final Plat Approval for
Island Club Riverside Phase IV
(memorandum dated April 5, 2000) 35-54
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA - (continued): PAGES
I. Appointment of Milt Thomas to Public Advisory Board
(FLAB) by Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
(memorandum dated April 4, 2000) 55-56
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS PAGE
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
RS -6, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE), TO RM -6, MULTIPLE -
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/
ACRE), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF 5THSTREET, S.W., APPROXIMATELY 655
FEET EAST OF 27TH AVENUE, AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
Sun -Up of Indian River, Inc. and Others' Request to
Rezone Approximately 40 Acres from RS -6 to RM -6
(Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 28, 2000) 57-73
2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
CG, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO RS -6,
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO
6 UNITS/ACRE), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF 27M AVENUE AND 14TH
STREET, S.W., AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PRO-
VIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
County Initiated Request to Rezone ±0.37 Acres from
CG to RS -6 (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 24, 2000) 74-86
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
BOOK X13 PAGE 03
Book U3 PAGE 04
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.Z BACKUP
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS PAGES
Scheduled for Public Hearing on May 2, 2000:
Sebastian Water Expansion Phase(s) II -D & II -E Indian River
County Project No's UW -97 -13 -DS & UW -97 -14 -DS
Resolution III
(memorandum dated April 4, 2000) 87
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
1. Request for Qualifications (RFQ's) for Addition and
Modification to Sheriff's Evidence Storage Space
(memorandum dated April 5, 2000) 88
2. Exchange Club Request to Use Parking Garage for
Music Festival
(memorandum dated March 29, 2000) 89-92
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Local Agency Agreement for the Gifford Bikepath
(memorandum dated March 30, 2000) 93-113
2. Local Agency Agreement for the Old Winter Beach
Road Bikepath
(memorandum dated April 3, 2000) 114-134
I
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.) BACKUP
PAGES
G. Public Works
3. Developers Agreement for paving 1,320 feet of
5th St. S.W., West of 43rd Ave. Arbor Trace
Planned Development.
(memorandum dated April 5, 2000) 135-139
4. Right -of -Way Acquisition 5' Street S.W. between 43rd
and 58th Avenues Street Paving Improvements Bernita
Johnston -Harkins
(memorandum dated March 29, 2000) 140-147
5. Right -of -Way Acquisition/County Project No. 9803 70
Avenue Improvements Edward A. & Cheryl E. Tillis
(memorandum dated March 28, 2000) 148-156
H. Utilities
1. North Beach R. O. Plant Conversion Final Change
Order, Release of Retainage & Final Payment and
Additional Engineering Amendment
(memorandum dated April 3, 2000) 157-188
2. Request for Authorization to release Final Payment
Including All Retainage Held for: The 98th Avenue
Master Plan Water and Master Plan Sewer Project
Pursuant to the Developer's Agreement.
(memorandum dated April 4, 2000)
I. Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Fran B. Adams
B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
189-196
BOOK IJ3 kAGE ��
_I
BOOK M PAGE 06
BACKUP
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd.l: PAGES
C. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Brief Overview of Central Florida Regional Economic
Summit 2000 Held March 29, 2000
(no Backup)
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 2/8/00
2. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 2/22/00
3. Approval of Change Order # 1- Construction of
Emergency Services Station # 11
(memorandum dated April 3, 2000) 197-198
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
Closed Landfill Preliminary Remedial Action Plan
(memorandum dated March 24, 2000) 199-217
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: bccl.co.indian-river.R.us
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p.m.
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF APRIL 11, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1
2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA ........................ 1
5.A. PROCLAMATION HONORING LIEUTENANT WQ,BOUR D. TRIPP ON HIS
RETIREMENT FROM FIRE DIVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT ................................................. 2
6.A. & B. APPROVAL OF N MUTES .................................. 4
7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................
4
7.A.
Reports Placed on File in the Office of the Clerk to the Board .........
4
7.B.
Approval of Warrants .......................................
4
7.C.
Modification of Agreement between City of Sebastian, Indian River County
and Nelson C. Hyatt (add Marie Dolores Hyatt) for Constructing
Improvements to Barber Street between FEC Railway and US 1 ......
12
7.D.
Proclamation in Support of "Celebration 2000" Fund Raiser for the
Coalition for the Homeless ..................................
14
7.E.
Harold Christenson's Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval for a
Multi -Family Development to be Known as Santa. Maria Apartments SP-
MA -99-06-36/98100151 ....................................
15
7.F.
KSM Engineering and Testing, Inc. - Request for Extension of Site Plan
Approval to Construct a Building and Outdoor Vehicle Storage Area ..
17
7.G.
Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Cost -Share Agreement
Extensions/Addenda for the Round Island South and Wabasso Scrub
Addition LAAC Sites .......................................
19
7.11.
Beazer Homes Request for Final Plat Approval for Island Club Riverside
PhaseIV ................................................
20
�l
BOOK M PAGE 07
I
BOOK 113 PAGE 08
7.I. Appointment of Milt Thomas to the Public Library Advisory Board by
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht ............................. 29
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-012 - REZONING
APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES FROM RS -6 TO RM -6 AS REQUESTED BY
SUN -UP OF INDIAN RIVER, INC. AND OTHERS - LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF 5TH STREET SW NEAR EAST SIDE 27TH AVENUE
(QUASI-JUDICIAL) ............................................ 30
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-013 REZONING
APPROXIMATELY 0.37 ACRES FROM CG TO RS -6 (COUNTY INITIATED
REQUEST) - LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF 27TH AVENUE AND
14TH STREET SW - OWNERS: CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS AND KELLY
BATTERSEA (QUASI-JUDICIAL) ................................. 41
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASES(S) II -D
& II -E - SCHEDULED FOR MAY 2, 2000 PUBLIC HEARING ........... 49
MCA. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FOR ADDITION AND
MODIFICATION TO SHERIFF'S EVIDENCE STORAGE SPACE... 49
ll.C.2. EXCHANGE CLUB'S REQUEST TO USE COURTHOUSE PARKING
GARAGE FOR MUSIC FESTIVAL ........................... 50
l l.G.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-042 - LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM
AGREEMENT - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -
GIFFORD BIKEPATH (US 1 BETWEEN 37TH AND 45TH STREETS)2
11.G.2. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-043 - LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM
AGREEMENT FOR THE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD BIKEPATH
ALONG JUNGLE TRAIL TO AlA ............................ 54
l l.G.3. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR PAVING 1320' OF 5TH STREET
SW WEST OF 43RD AVENUE - THE ARBOR TRACE
DEVELOPMENT, INC. (A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ......... 57
l l.G.4. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 5TH STREET SW BETWEEN 43RD
AND 58TH AVENUES - STREET PAVING EMPROVEMENTS -
BERNITA JOHNSTON-HARKINS ........................... 59
2
0 is
_I
11.G.5. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 74TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS -
EDWARD A. & CHERYL E. TILLIS - COUNTY PROJECT NO. 9803 61
11.H.1. NORTH BEACH R.O. PLANT CONVERSION - FINAL CHANGE
ORDER, RELEASE OF RETAINAGE AND FINAL PAYMENT -
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING AMENDMENT - CAMP DRESSER &
MCKEE, INC. - TLC DIVERSIFIED, INC ....................... 62
11.H.2. AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE FINAL PAYMENT INCLUDING ALL
RETAINAGE HELD FOR THE 98TH AVENUE MASTER PLAN
WATER AND MASTER PLAN SEWER PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITH ALFRED SCOPINICH (KSM) 64
12. PARTIAL RELEASE OF UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNITS 11, 16, AND 17 .................... 66
13.C.1. COMMISSIONER MACHT - BRIEF OVERVIEW OF CENTRAL
FLORIDA REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMIT 2000 HELD MARCH 29, 2000
....................................................... 67
13.C.2. COMMISSIONER MACHT - CULTURAL ELEMENT FOR
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN .................................. 68
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ......................... 68
14.13. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ........................ 69
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ...................... 69
BOOK 113 PAGE 09
April 11, 2000
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, April 11, 2000. Present were, Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Caroline D. Ginn, Vice
Chairman; Kenneth R Macht; Ruth Stanbridge; and John W. Tippin. Also present were
James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney;
and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Tippin delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice Chairman Ginn led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONSMELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
Commissioner Macht requested the addition of item 13.C.2. concerning addition of
a Cultural Element to the Comprehensive Plan.
Chairman Adams advised there was an addition of item 12. Partial Release of Utility
Easements Located in Sebastian Highlands.
April 11, 2000
1
•
BOOK 113 PAGE 1
BOOK PAGE
Administrator Chandler requested the deletion of item 7.H., but Vice Chairman Ginn
and Commissioner Stanbridge wanted to discuss that item (Beazer Homes request for final
plat approval for Island Club Riverside Phase IV) so it was not withdrawn, but separated
from the Consent Agenda for discussion.
Chairman Adams announced there was a revised page 114 to the back up (for item
11.G.2.)
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously made the
requested changes to the agenda.
5.A. PROCLAMATION HONORING LIEUTENANT WILBOUR D.
TRIPP ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM FIRE DIVISION OF
EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Chairman Adams read and presented the proclamation and retirement award to Lt.
Tripp. In addition, she thanked him for his support of the Frog Leg Festival.
Lt. Wilbour D. "Zip" Tripp advised he had enjoyed and made many great friends
in his 29 years with the fire department. He felt great strides had been made in the
department and hoped the Firefighters' Fair keeps going.
Pi20CLAMATION
HONORING LIEUTENANT WILBOUR D. TRIPP
ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
EMPLOYMENT ON
APRIL 30, 2000
WHEREAS, WILBOUR D. TRIPP announces his retirement from Indian River
County Department of Emergency Services. Fire Division and the Indian River County Board
of County Commissioners effective April 30.2000: and
April 11, 2000
2
WHEREAS. WILBOUR D. TRIPP returned from service In Vietnam in 1971 and after
a short time in school started a new career: and
WHEREAS, WILBOUR D. TRIPP was employed by the Vero Beach Fire Department
on May 12,1972, as a Firefighter. was promoted to Engineer on March 20,1977. to Lieutenant
on March 7,1982, and serving in that capacity for the past eighteen years. During his career
with the Indian River County Department of Emergency Services he has served countless
hours as the founder and organizer of our county fair and as President of the Vero Beach
Firefighters Association. He has earned the respect and admiration of the community and will
be sorely missed by his co-workers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that the Board expresses its
deep appreciation for the services LIEUTENANT WILBOUR D. TRIPP has performed on
behalf of Indian River County and extends heartfelt wishes for a happy retirement and success
in future endeavors.
Adopted this 111° day of April 2000.
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida
This is to certify that
Wilbour Tripp
is hereby presented this
Retirement Award
for outstanding performance and faithful
service to
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
for twenty seven years of service
on this 30" day of April 2000
Q.Y. _6 Q
ts,a.. ns� a�,ema�tcarc. =J
April 11, 2000
3
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA
Fran B. Adams. Chairman
BOOK 1 13 F'AGE
r,
BOOK U3 PAGE 1
6.A. & B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meetings of March 7, 2000 or March 14, 2000. There were none.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED By
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meetings of March 7, 2000 and March
14, 2000, as written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Item 7.H. had been separated earlier for discussion.
7.A. Reports Placed on File in the O ace of the Clerk to the Board
Public Notice from the City of Sebastian City Council for a Quasi -Judicial Public
Hearing for Wed., 4/12/00 at 7 p.m. in City Hall to consider adopting a resolution
approving a preliminary plat for Publix Indian River Subdivision located at the
northwest comer of Barber Street & US 1(9.92 acre tract currently CG)
Sebastian Inlet Tax District Commission Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for FY
1998-1999 with Proposed Meeting Schedule
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 30, 2000:
April 11, 2000
4
•
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 30, 2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of March 23, 2000 to March 30, 2000.
Attachment:
EMF:AH
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
March 23-30, 2000, as requested.
April 11, 2000
5
•
BOOK LJ PAGE 14
BOOK x.13 PAGE
April 11, 2000
2
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
IR
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
NAME
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER
0020469
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
2000-03-23
20.00
9,918.65
0020470
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
2000-03-23
138.50
0020471
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
2000-03-29
285.24
0020472
CAREY,PA PARTICK A.
2000-03-29
92.31
0020473
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
2000-03-29
0020474
WI SCTF
2000-03-29
150.00
200.00
0020475
VELASQUEZ, MERIDA
2000-03-29
226.97
0020476
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
2000-03-29
0020477
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
2000-03-29
295.00
0020478
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
2000-03-29
521.88
0020479
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
2000-03-29
2,430.00
0020480
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
2000-03-29
82,973.83
0020481
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
2000-03-29
231.03
0020482
UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER CTY
2000-03-29
3,120.96
0020483
NACO/SOUTHEAST
2000-03-29
6,961.45
0020484
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
2000-03-29
552.28
0020485
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
2000-03-29
23.08
0020486
FL SDU
2000-03-29
7,304.98
0020487
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
2000-03-29
4.00
0020488
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
2000-03-29
1,635.00
0264798
STEWART, NALL, EVANS & HAFNER
1999-06-24
.00
0268911
BIG BEND CHAPTER, SBCCI/BOAF
1999-09-09
.00
0271049
STEWART, NALL, EVANS & HAFNER
1999-10-14
.00
0276712
CABOT LODGE
2000-02-03
.00
0277386
SCANDVIK
2000-02-10
.00
0278132
LOPEZ, PATRICIA
2000-02-24
.00
0278888
INTERNATIONAL SOLID WASTE ASOC
2000-03-09
.00
0279328
LANGUAGE SERVICES, LTD
2000-03-16
.00
0279380
PRESS JOURNAL
2000-03-16
.00
0279549
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
2000-03-23
.00
0279981
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-03-30
949.25
0279982
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
2000-03-30
108.50
0279983
ADRON FENCE COMPANY
2000-03-30
599.00
0279984
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL
2000-03-30
35.00
0279985
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
2000-03-30
2,961.27
0279986
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
2000-03-30
285.52
0279987
ATLANTIC ROOFING OF
2000-03-30
3,192.00
0279988
AT EASE ARMY NAVY
2000-03-30
266.00
0279989
ABS PUMPS, INC
2000-03-30
2,022.56
0279990
A S C E AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
2000-03-30
14.25
0279991
ATLANTIC FORD TRUCK SALES, INC
2000-03-30
137,754.00
0279992
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
2000-03-30
108.75
0279993
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2000-03-30
48.64
0279994
A T & T
2000-03-30
51.66
0279995
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
2000-03-30
34,895.73
0279996
ACTION TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC
2000-03-30
200.00
0279997
AAC BUILDERS, INC
2000-03-30
500.00
0279998
AVIS
2000-03-30
109.04
0279999
APOLLO ENTERPRISES
2000-03-30
124.65
0280000
AGRO DISTRIBUTION, LLC
2000-03-30
2,032.45
0280001
ATLANTIC ORTHOPAEDIC GROUP
2000-03-30
132.06
0280002
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE
2000-03-30
62.75
0280003
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2000-03-30
4,735.13
0280004
BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY
2000-03-30
316.51
0280005
BREWER ELECTRIC ENTERPRISE INC
2000-03-30
485.00
0280006
BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD
2000-03-30
1,850.00
0280007
BARTON, JEFFREY R- CLERK
2000-03-30
201,159.50
0280008
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
2000-03-30
482.96
0280009
BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION
2000-03-30
500.00
April 11, 2000
2
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
IR
April 11, 2000
7
sooK " ``
PAGEib
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
NAME
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER
0280010
BERTOLETTE, RANDALL DEB, MD
2000-03-30
17.00
0280011
BARTON, JEFFREY K
2000-03-30
1,636.05
0280012
BURKEEN, BRIAN
2000-03-30
214.00
0280013
BEUTTELL, PETER M
2000-03-30
500.00
0280014
BRANDON CAPITAL CORPORATION
2000-03-30
86.14
0280015
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
2000-03-30
767.85
0280016
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
2000-03-30
67.29
0280017
BETTER COPY CENTER, A
2000-03-30
145.28
0280018
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
2000-03-30
420.78
0280019
HEM, BETTY
2000-03-30
41.20
0280020
BROOKER, ELIZABETH STEWART
2000-03-30
262.50
0280021
BUILDING OFFICIAL'S ASSOC
2000-03-30
20.00
0280022
BAROT, BASHKAR
2000-03-30
7,736.62
0280023
BOURDETTE, JASON
2000-03-30
500.00
0280024
HIP DIPIETRO ELECTRIC INC
2000-03-30
765.22
0280025
HUCKNER, JACK
2000-03-30
8.71
0280026
BELLSOUTH
2000-03-30
552.20
0280027
COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO., INC
2000-03-30
122.72
0280028
CLASSIC AWARDS
2000-03-30
46.00
0280029
CO1'MUNICATIONS INT'L INC
2000-03-30
230.43
0280030
CRAMER, CHARLES A
2000-03-30
71.37
0280031
COX GIFFORD FUNERAL ROME
2000-03-30
300.00
0280032
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
2000-03-30
9,938.97
0280033
CLINIC PHARMACY
2000-03-30
394.94
0280034
COPELAND, LINDA
2000-03-30
808.50
0280035
CARTER & VERPLANCK
2000-03-30
10,000.00
0280036
CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
2000-03-30
1,352.67
0280037
COPIER SPECIALIST PLUS
2000-03-30
539.55
0280038
COUNTY VETERANS' SERVICE
2000-03-30
60.00
0280039
CSR AMERICA, INC.
2000-03-30
428.23
0280040
CRAWFORD, SANDY
2000-03-30
19.00
0280041
COOPER, GEORGE
2000-03-30
5,700.00
0280042
CARIBE ROYAL HOTEL
2000-03-30
338.00
0280043
CONSTRUCTION LICENSING
2000-03-30
40.00
0280044
CONRADO, STEFANIE
2000-03-30
69.53
0280045
CUSTOM CANVAS
2000-03-30
1,035.00
0280046
CITIFINANCIAL MORTGAGE CO
2000-03-30
431.16
0280047
CLIFFORD, ANGELA
2000-03-30
6.00
0280048
CAMFIELD, GRAY
2000-03-30
5,528.16
0280049
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
2000-03-30
777.31
0280050
DICRERSON-FLORIDA, INC
2000-03-30
781.40
0280051
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
2000-03-30
1,024.22
0280052
DANGERFIELD, DAVID
2000-03-30
18.00
0280053
DURO-TEST CORP
2000-03-30
4,990.60
0280054
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
2000-03-30
2,176.03
0280055
DILLMAN, LINDA WATSON
2000-03-30
598.00
0280056
ERRETT, NANCY
2000-03-30
118.80
0280057
EVANS, FLOYD
2000-03-30
37.50
0280058
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
2000-03-30
29.00
0280059
ELPEX, INC
2000-03-30
389.80
0280060
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
2000-03-30
11,985.37
0280061
EMERGENCY LINEN SUPPLY CO
2000-03-30
287.60
0280062
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
2000-03-30
4,554.96
0280063
EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
2000-03-30
2,923.18
0280064
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
2000-03-30
14,715.94
0280065
FLORIDA WATER RESOURCES
2000-03-30
135.60
April 11, 2000
7
sooK " ``
PAGEib
BOOK M PAGE 17
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0280066
FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING
2000-03-30
17.00
0280067
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
2000-03-30
940.20
0280068
FLINN, SHEILA I
2000-03-30
161.00
0280069
FAIRWINDS TRAVEL & TOURS
2000-03-30
626.00
0280070
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
2000-03-30
66.67
0280071
FATHER & SON CARPET, INC
2000-03-30
65.00
0280072
FACTICON, INC
2000-03-30
1,275.00
0280073
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
2000-03-30
837.14
0280074
FIRSTLAB
2000-03-30
1,861.50
0280075
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
2000-03-30
1,661.00
0280076
FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
2000-03-30
546.00
0280077
FRANK'S HANG-UP
2000-03-30
49.33
0280078
GENERAL GMC, TRUCK
2000-03-30
180.00
0280079
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-03-30
1,971.25
0280080
GARCIA, ART
2000-03-30
500.00
0280081
GOVERNOR'S HURRICANE
2000-03-30
625.00
0280082
GREENE, ROBERT E
2000-03-30
1,956.77
0280083
GOLDCOAST ANESTHESIA ASSOC
2000-03-30
516.73
0280084
GEORGE TRACY PLUMBING
2000-03-30
108.50
0280085
GREEN, PHILLIP
2000-03-30
113.30
0280086
GRAPH% PRINTING
2000-03-30
456.00
0280087
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
2000-03-30
584.72
0280088
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
2000-03-30
122.50
0280089
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH
2000-03-30
25.00
0280090
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2000-03-30
500.00
0280091
HUCKLEBERRY ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-03-30
98.00
0280092
HANSEN, SUSAN
2000-03-30
151.96
0280093
HUGH C TURNER CONSTRUCTION
2000-03-30
5,207.00
0280094
HEALTHSOUTH MELBOURNEEE S.C.
2000-03-30
1,844.54
0280095
HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
2000-03-30
831.90
0280096
HEILIG MEYERS
2000-03-30
2,398.00
0280097
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-03-30
59,092.00
0280098
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
2000-03-30
1,207.50
0280099
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
2000-03-30
597.50
0280100
INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
2000-03-30
76.32
0280101
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
2000-03-30
763.57
0280102
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
2000-03-30
750.57
0280103
I M S A FLORIDA SECTION
2000-03-30
450.00
0280104
INSURANCE SERVICING &
2000-03-30
275.00
0280105
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
2000-03-30
25.46
0280106
IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
2000-03-30
4,075.00
0280107
INTERIM PERSONNEL
2000-03-30
781.92
0280108
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY
2000-03-30
5,756.63
0280109
JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS
2000-03-30
190.00
0280110
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
2000-03-30
462.22
0280111
JONES, RAY
2000-03-30
18.00
0280112
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
2000-03-30
560.72
0280113
J C WELTON CONSTRUCTION INC
2000-03-30
5,591.00
0280114
KELLER, LEA
2000-03-30
64.00
0280115
KELLY TRACTOR CO
2000-03-30
103.68
0280116
K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING
2000-03-30
420.00
0280117
KRUGER, INC
2000-03-30
90,607.00
0280118
KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
2000-03-30
2,110.81
0280119
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
2000-03-30
129.08
0280120
KNOWLES, CYRIL
2000-03-30
519.52
0280121
KEYS-MCCAIN, MARGARET
2000-03-30
253.40
0280122
KANGA, IMTIAZ I
2000-03-30
6.99
0280123
KEISER, FRED W
2000-03-30
5.16
April 11, 2000
8
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0280124 LOCKWOOD, ROBERT E
0280125 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
0280126 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
0280127 LFI VERO BEACH, INC
0280128 LESCO, INC
0280129 LIVE OAK LAWN SUPPLY INC
0280130 LANGSTON, HESS, SOLTON,ZNOSKO
0280131 LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
0280132 LUNA, JORGE
0280133 LANDSCAPE STOP
0280134 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
0280135 LEWIS, BARBARA
0280136 LUNA, JUVENAL
0280137 LOWTHER CREMATION SERVICES INC
0280138 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
0280139 MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
0280140 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
0280141 MIKES GARAGE
0280142 MAGANA, IGNACIO M D
0280143 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
0280144 MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC
0280145 MEADOWS, PEGGY J
0280146 M G B CONSTRUCTION
0280147 MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
0280148 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
0280149 MICKLE, VALERIE
0280150 MEDCHECK
0280151 MOSS, ROGER
0280152 MOSS, MARY
0280153 MERCURI, DEBRA
0260154 MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC
0280155 MURPHY, DEBBIE
0280156 MARTIN, CRISTI
0280157 MAXWELL, KIMBERLY
0280158 METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC
0280159 MATHESON, EDWARD G, ESQ
0280160 MC GEE, JOHN
0280161 NOLTE, DAVID C
0280162 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO
0280163 N E C BUSINESS NETWORK
0280164 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
0280165 OFFICE DEPOT, INC
0280166 O'BRIEN, PHYLIS
0280167 PARKS RENTAL INC
0280168 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
0280169 PHILLIPS, LINDA R
0280170 PETTY CASH
0280171 PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
0280172 PANGBURN, TERRI
0280173 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
0280174 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
0280175 PRESS JOURNAL
0280176 PEGASUS TRAVEL
0280177 PUBLIX PHARMACY
0280178 PARKER, DEBBIE
0280179 P B S & J ANALYTICAL SERVICES
0280180 P B S & J ANALYTICAL SERVICES
0280181 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLY
0280182 RADIOSHACK
April 11, 2000
0
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
2000-03-30
3.00
2000-03-30
890.89
2000-03-30
636.22
2000-03-30
4,369.85
2000-03-30
27.27
2000-03-30
8,173.85
2000-03-30
1,703.25
2000-03-30
728.00
2000-03-30
126.18
2000-03-30
420.00
2000-03-30
279.10
2000-03-30
36.05
2000-03-30
43.78
2000-03-30
300.00
2000-03-30
416.64
2000-03-30
97.18
2000-03-30
17,265.41
2000-03-30
155.00
2000-03-30
29.00
2000-03-30
93.50
2000-03-30
362.25
2000-03-30
8.90
2000-03-30
1,500.00
2000-03-30
44.36
2000-03-30
648.44
2000-03-30
28.05
2000-03-30
459.40
2000-03-30
82.40
2000-03-30
43.78
2000-03-30
42.92
2000-03-30
65.00
2000-03-30
230.38
2000-03-30
168.00
2000-03-30
43.78
2000-03-30
147.61
2000-03-30
1,800.00
2000-03-30
27.81
2000-03-30
147,442.09
2000-03-30
1,500.00
2000-03-30
3,192.00
2000-03-30
1,599.27
2000-03-30
2,716.30
2000-03-30
8.90
2000-03-30
2,322.38
2000-03-30
86.40
2000-03-30
455.00
2000-03-30
67.65
2000-03-30
90.00
2000-03-30
36.00
2000-03-30
21.53
2000-03-30
926.25
2000-03-30
117.00
2000-03-30
533.00
2000-03-30
10.49
2000-03-30
36.05
2000-03-30
17,328.00
2000-03-30
10,743.00
2000-03-30
935.00
2000-03-30
106.95
BOOK Id PAGE .��
_I
April 11, 2000
10
0 0
BOOK PAGE 19
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0280183
RINGHAVER
2000-03-30
505.98
0280184
RINGHAVER EQUIPMENT CO
2000-03-30
62.00
0280185
ROSELAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
2000-03-30
16.00
0280186
REXFORD, INC
2000-03-30
11,514.00
0280187
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
2000-03-30
94.50
0280188
.RICE, JAMES R & CRYSTAL
2000-03-30
17.12
0280189
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
2000-03-30
49.88
0280190
RIVER PARR PLACE
2000-03-30
330.00
0280191
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
2000-03-30
881.31
0280192
ROMANO, CHRISTINA
2000-03-30
36.05
0280193
SCHOPP, BARBARA G
2000-03-30
171.50
0280194
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
2000-03-30
4.50
0280195
SCOTTY'S, INC
2000-03-30
99.81
0280196
SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
2000-03-30
7,042.00
0280197
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
2000-03-30
150.00
0280198
SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE
2000-03-30
4,534.25
0280199
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
2000-03-30
2,175.00
0280200
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
2000-03-30
64.38
0280201
ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
2000-03-30
129.35
0280202
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
2000-03-30
229.50
0280203
ST JOHN'S RIVER WATER MGMT
2000-03-30
700.00
0280204
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
2000-03-30
81.00
0280205
SAM'S CLUB
2000-03-30
68.28
0280206
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
2000-03-30
438.74
0280207
SEXTON, HILDY
2000-03-30
80.00
0280208
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
2000-03-30
361.60
0280209
SHERMAN, ROGER
2000-03-30
4,546.00
0280210
SUPERIOR PRINTING
2000-03-30
141.95
0280211
SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY EQUIP
2000-03-30
864.03
0280212
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
2000-03-30
509.64
0280213
SECURITYLINK FROM
2000-03-30
82.50
0280214
SHERATON OCEAN FRONT HOTEL
2000-03-30
316.00
0280215
SMART CORPORATION
2000-03-30
63.80
0280216
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2000-03-30
50.00
0280217
SULLIVAN, RACHEL
2000-03-30
118.45
0280218
SOUTHERN MANUFACTURING
2000-03-30
994.99
0280219
SALTONSTALL, MYRNA
2000-03-30
64.38
0280220
SMITH & LOVELESS INC
2000-03-30
5,825.90
0280221
SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC
2000-03-30
73,485.00
0280222
SILEO, STEVEN ANDREW
2000-03-30
20.60
0280223
SECURITY FIRST TITLE PARTNERS
2000-03-30
17.43
0260224
SEMINOLE OF OKEECHOBEE/JUPITER
2000-03-30
1,116.00
0280225
SECURITYLINK FROM AMERITECH
2000-03-30
86.46
0280226
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
2000-03-30
38.63
0280227
SOUTHERN MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
2000-03-30
600.75
0280228
TEEJAYS'
2000-03-30
37.50
0280229
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-03-30
1,088.10
0280230
THOMAS, DEBBY L
2000-03-30
59.50
0280231
TIPPIN, JOHN W
2000-03-30
26.39
0280232
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
2000-03-30
123.00
0280233
TRADE WINDS ROOFING INC
2000-03-30
3,100.00
0280234
TAMPA MARRIOTT WATERSIDE
2000-03-30
1,746.00
0280235
TREASURE COAST BUILDERS
2000-03-30
500.00
0280236
TRAFFIC MONITORING
2000-03-30
405.00
0280237
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
2000-03-30
399.00
0280238
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
2000-03-30
5,065.13
0280239
UNLOCKING POTENTIAL INSTITUTE
2000-03-30
476.00
0280240
U.S. FILTER
2000-03-30
1,480.40
April 11, 2000
10
0 0
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0280241
VERO BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE
2000-03-30
24.00
0280242
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-03-30
608.11
0280243
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-03-30
9,175.00
0280244
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
2000-03-30
111.60
0280245
VERO LAKE ESTATES FIRE
2000-03-30
8.00
0280246
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
2000-03-30
195.93
0280247
VIRGIL'S RADIATOR WORKS
2000-03-30
1,635.00
0280248
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-03-30
1,783.77
0280249
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
2000-03-30
39.19
0280250
VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO
2000-03-30
1,467.35
0280251
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000-03-30
418.58
0280252
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4248
2000-03-30
90.00
0280253
WELTER, PETER DC
2000-03-30
190.40
0280254
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000-03-30
531.18
0280255
WILLHOFF, PATSY
2000-03-30
130.00
0280256
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
2000-03-30
78,577.00
0280257
WILSON, LEONARD A SR
2000-03-30
9.82
0280258
WILLIAMS, MARY
2000-03-30
29,471.84
0280259
WSCF-FM
2000-03-30
170.00
0280260
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
2000-03-30
416.39
0280261
WOLFE, ERIN
2000-03-30
18.03
02802.62
WELLS, CARLOS L, ESQ
2000-03-30
360.95
0280263
WALKER PROCESS EQUIPMENT
2000-03-30
1,750.00
0280264
WILSON, SUSAN BARNES
2000-03-30
190.55
0280265
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
2000-03-30
367.65
0280266
WALGREEN CO
2000-03-30
235.40
0280267
W W GRAINGER INC
2000-03-30
973.04
0280268
XEROX CORPORATION
2000-03-30
2,305.00
0280269
YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
2000-03-30
4,114.18
0280270
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
2000-03-30
103.40
0280271
ZAMARRIPA, JAIME
2000-03-30
69.53
0280272
ZARISTE, WILLIAM
2000-03-30
118.44
0280273
ZIEGLER, JULIE
2000-03-30
37.32
0280274
THOMAS, JAMES SR
2000-03-30
411.46
0280275
POST, LORRAINE
2000-03-30
323.26
0280276
MERCURI, DEBRA
2000-03-30
486.14
0280277
JOHNSON, LETISHA D
2000-03-30
494.00
0280278
PURCELL, MICHAEL
2000-03-30
67.16
0280279
CHERVANSKY, JOSEPH
2000-03-30
100.00
0280280
HARRISON, MARY KATE
2000-03-30
78.65
0280281
SERVICE REFRIGATION
2000-03-30
114.42
0280282
QUANT, BRIAN W
2000-03-30
24.50
0280283
LUCAS, PAUL
2000-03-30
50.96
0280284
KLINE, LARRY
2000-03-30
44.08
0280285
BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION CO
2000-03-30
29.25
0280286
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
2000-03-30
124.69
0280287
REARDANZ, MARVIN
2000-03-30
62.38
0280288
PETERSON, JOHN
2000-03-30
82.47
0280289
CHECKERS DRIVE IN RESTUARANTS
2000-03-30
188.01
0280290
HUBBELL, PAUL
2000-03-30
69.02
0280291
BEAN, RONALD L
2000-03-30
19.19
0280292
WETHERINGTON, WILSON L
2000-03-30
50.29
0280293
HAMILTON, LYNN
2000-03-30
9.52
0280294
FRANKLIN, REGINA R
2000-03-30
20.56
0280295
FITZPATRICK SR, DONALD
2000-03-30
27.05
0280296
GILLESPIE, TREVA
2000-03-30
35.17
0280297
SCOTT, MARY DEAN
2000-03-30
82.78
0280298
THORNTON, JENNIFER
2000-03-30
79.02
April 11, 2000
11
BOOK M PAGE 40
J
FF -
BOOK 113 PAGE.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0280299
VANDERHEIDEN, LYNN
2000-03-30
43.81
0280300
AMERITREND HOMES
2000-03-30
40.03
0280301
BOCCHINO, JASON S
2000-03-30
129.30
0280302
AVERILL, SHANE
2000-03-30
76.33
0280303
VAN CAMPEN, PHILIP
2000-03-30
35.03
0280304
LOCKWOOD, SHERRY
2000-03-30
53.76
0280305
COPPOLA, CHRISTI L
2000-03-30
69.94
0280306
STAYANOFF, THOMAS E
2000-03-30
70.68
0280307
JEWETT, DONAVON V
2000-03-30
25.49
0280308
RAFFERTY, ADAM S
2000-03-30
12.31
0280309
BARRS, REVONDA J
2000-03-30
22.07
0280310
SALVAGGIO, JOSEPH
2000-03-30
24.10
0280311
PRESCOTT, TREVOR
2000-03-30
43.91
0280312
BERK, DAVID
2000-03-30
15.25
0280313
BASSUE, VANCELYN
2000-03-30
35.73
0280314
FLETCHER, BOBBY
2000-03-30
25.94
0280315
HOLCOMB, MISTY M
2000-03-30
11.33
0280316
ARNOLD, JOHANN
2000-03-30
5.45
0280317
DORAWA, ANDRE
2000-03-30
44.97
0280318
VONIER, MARION R
2000-03-30
11.14
0280319
ROYAL, LISA R
2000-03-30
18.38
0280320
MITTEN, JOHN
2000-03-30
14.31
0280321
BROWN, ANGELA R
2000-03-30
60.81
0280322
COUNTYSIDE N MOBILE HOME PARK
2000-03-30
1,383.99
$ 1, 317, 104. 31
7. C. Modification of Agreement between City of Sebastian, Indian
River Coun& and Nelson C. Hyatt (add Marie Dolores Hyatt for
Constructing Improvements to Barber Street between FEC Railway
and US I
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 2000:
April 11, 2000
12
-I
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: tL.t William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney
DATE: March 29, 2000
SUBJECT: Modification to Agreement between City of Sebastian, Indian River
County, and Nelson Hyatt for Constructing Improvements to Barber
Street between FEC Railway and U.S. 1
January 14, 1997 the aforementioned parties entered into an agreement for the
relocation of Barber Street between FEC Railway and U.S. 1. Nelson Hyatt
dedicated right-of-way at no cost in exchange for traffic impact fee credits to his
property in the Sebastian area. Mr. Hyatt recently contacted me and requested
that the agreement be modified so that the "Developer" in the agreement would
be identified not only as Nelson C. Hyatt but also as Marie Dolores Hyatt, his
wife. This modification is on the advice of his attorney for estate planning
purposes. His attorney confirms that Mrs. Hyatt has an interest in the property to
be benefited by the traffic impact fee credits in the agreement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached Modification of the Agreement identifying not only Nelson
C. Hyatt, but also his wife Marie Dolores Hyatt as "Developer".
WGC/nhm
Attachment
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Modification of the Agreement identifying not only
Nelson C. Hyatt, but also his wife Marie Dolores Hyatt, as
"Developer", as recommended in the Memorandum.
April 11, 2000
MODIFICATION TO AGREEMENT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WIZEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
13
BOOK 11J PAGE 4
BOOK L3 PAGE 23
7.D. Proclamation in SuMort of "Celebration 2000 " FundRaiser�or
the Coalition for the Homeless
PROCLAMATION
IN SUPPORT OF
"CELEBRATION 2000"
FUND-RAISER FOR THE
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
THURSDAY, MAY 18, 2000
WHEREAS, The Coalition for the Homeless of Indian River County will hold
"Celebration 2000"'at Riverside Theatre on Thursday, May 18, and
WHEREAS, The Coalition for the Homeless of Indian River County is dedicated
to end homelessness through providing for the imminent needs of the indigent, combined
with offering continued education and stalls necessary for the participants to develop healthy
lifestyles; and
WHEREAS, The Coalition offers a wide range of services to help the needy avoid
homelessness and to help them return to a productive role in society; and
WHEREAS, The Coalition for the Homeless of Indian River County is supported
primarily by contributions:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board
congraaddates The Coalition for the Homeless of Indian River County for their hard work
in attempting to eradicate homelessness in this County, and the Board further urges all
citizens of Indian River County to support the fund-raising efforts of this worthwhile
organization.
Dated this 11th day of Apel, 2000.
April 11, 2000
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
(A ac rn"
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
14
•
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
Proclamation in support of "Celebration 2000" fund raiser for
the Coalition for the Homeless on Thursday, May 18, 2000.
7.E. Harold Christenson's Request for Extension of Site Plan
Apnr�ova_l for a Multi Family Development to be Known as Santa
Maria Apartments SP -M4-99-06-36/98100151
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 5, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP VIA
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: April 5, 2000
SUBJECT: Harold Christenson's Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval for a Multi -
Family Development to be Known as Santa Maria Apartments
SP -MA -99-06-36 / 98100151
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 11, 2000.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On May 13, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted conditional major site plan
approval to construct a 153 unit apartment complex to be known as Santa Maria Apartments.
Approval was given to construct the apartment complex at the southeast corner of 58'b Avenue and
26t° Street. The current expiration date of the site plan approval is May 13, 2000.
April 11, 2000
15
BOOK ...�.� PAGE
•
BOOK PAGE
The project applicant has filed a request to extend the site plan approval expiration date. Financing
issues are the stated reasons for the delay in construction, according to the applicant. Pursuant to
site plan regulations, the extension request may now be considered by the Board of County
Commissioners.
ANALYSIS:
Although the LDRs have been amended since the time of project review and approval, the members
of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that subsequent amendments as applied to the
subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or redesign of the project.
All TRC staff members have recently approved the applicant's request for site plan extension.
As allowed under provisions of the LDRs, the developer is requesting a full one year extension of
the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the LDRs, the Board of County
Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with additional conditions the requested site plan
extension. Staff has no objections to the Board granting the request since the previously approved
site plan and corresponding approval conditions substantially conform to existing LDR requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Harold Christenson's
request for a one year extension of the conditional site plan approval with all original approval
conditions to remain in effect. The new site plan approval expiration date will be May 13, 2001.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Request Letter
2. Location Map
3. Site Plan and List of Approved Conditions
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously granted Harold
Christenson a one-year extension of the conditional site plan
approval with all original/previously approved conditions to
remain in effect, as requested. (New expiration date May 13,
2001.)
April 11, 2000
16
-I
7.F. KSMEngineering and Testing, Ina - Reguest for Extension of
Site Plan Anyroval to Construct a Building and Outdoor Vehicle
Storage Area
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 5, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert Ni. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling,
Planning Director
FROM: Jeff Blackstone 13
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: April 5, 2000
SUBJECT: KSM Engineering and Testing, Inc.'s Request for Extension of Site Plan
Approval to Construct a Building and Outdoor Vehicle Storage Area
SP -MA -99-05-27 / 97050041
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 11, 2000.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On March 25, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted major site plan approval for KSM
Engineering and Testing, Inc. to construct a 3,700 sq. ft. contractors trades building and 5,336 sq.
ft. unpaved, stabilized vehicle storage area. Approval was given to construct the development on
the west side of US #1, approximately lh mile south of CR 512.
The request for an extension of the site plan approval for this project was received by staff on March
23, 2000. The county land development regulations require that the request for an extension be made
prior to the expiration of site plan approval. Therefore, the applicant is still eligible to be granted
an extension, even though the expiration date of the site plan approval has now passed.
April 11, 2000
17
�J PAGE
BOOK 46
BOOK FAGE
The project applicant has filed a request to extend the site plan approval expiration date. According
to the applicant, the delay in construction has been caused by financial issues and the completion of
site work that is necessary prior to construction. Pursuant to site plan regulations, the extension
request may now be considered by the Board of County Commissioners.
ANALYSIS:
Although the LDRs have been amended since the time of project review and approval, the members
of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that subsequent amendments as applied to the
subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or redesign of the project.
All TRC staff members have recently approved the applicant's request for site plan extension.
As allowed under provisions of the LDRs, the developer is requesting a full one year extension of
the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the LDRs, the Board of County
Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with conditions the requested site plan extension.
Staff has no objections to the Board granting the request since the previously approved site plan
substantially conforms to existing LDR requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the KSM Engineering and
Testing, Inc.'s request for a one year extension of the site plan approval. The new site plan approval
expiration date will be March 25, 2001.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Request Letter
2. Location Map
3. Site Plan
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously granted the one-
year extension of the site plan approval as requested by KSM
Engineering and Testing, Inc., as recommended in the
Memorandum. (New site plan approval expiration date will be
3/25/2001.)
April 11, 2000
18
•
7.G. Florida Communities Trust (FCT� Cost -Share Agreement
Extensions/Addenda for the Round Island South and Wabasso Scrub
Addition LAAC Sites
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 5, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
AR HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert . Keating, AICP
Community Development Directof
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois; AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: April 5, 2000
RE: Board Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost -Share
Agreement Extensions/Addenda for the Round Island South
and Wabasso Scrub Addition LAAC Sites
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 11, 2000.
DF. CREMON AND CONDITIONS
Attached, for the Board's approval consideration, are Addenda to Conceptual Approval Agreements relating
to the Round Island South and Wabasso Scrub Addition Florida Communities Trust (FCT) environmental
land acquisition cost -share projects.
Round 102nd South
The Round Island South "Addendum VI to Conceptual Approval Agreement" will extend the FCT grant until
October 31, 2000, to allow finalization of the project purchase. Although the Casey parcels of the project
are scheduled to closed by the end of April, this extension will allow extra time if unforeseen circumstances
postpone the closing beyond the current grant expiration date of April 30, 2000.
The Wabasso Scrub Addition was originally approved by the FCT for "contingency" funding, in case monies
became available due to higher ranked projects being withdrawn or bought at a lower price than allocated
funds. FCT fiords have now become available, and the attached "Addendum I to Conceptual Approval
Agreement" modifies the original Agreement to account for the availability of fiords.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute the
attached agreement addenda for the Round Island South and Wabasso Scrub Addition LAAC projects.
April 11, 2000
19
•
BOOK
PAGE �
F,
BOOK M PAGE 2"3
1. "Addendum VI to the Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Round Island South project.
2. "Addendum I to Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Wabasso Scrub Addition project.
ON MOTION by "lice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to execute the proposed agreement addenda for the
Round Island South and Wabasso Scrub Addition LAAC
projects, as recommended in the Memorandum.
COPIES OF ADDENDA ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.H. Beazer Homes Request for Final Plat Avner for Island Club
Riverside Phase IV
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 5, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DSION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
�,
Robert M. Keating, ATI
Community Development Director
,'ib3
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Mark Zans ML
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: April 5, 2000
SUBJECT: Beazer Homes Request for Final Plat Approval for Island Club Riverside
Phase IV
April ll, 2000
20
I
0
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 11, 2000.
DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATION:
The overall Island Club Riverside subdivision Phases IV - VI proposes three phases of development
resulting in 121 lots on a 48.49 acre property located east of Jungle Trail immediately west of Island
Club subdivision Phases I -III. The riverside subdivision will be accessed from SR A -1-A via an
extension of the existing Island Club Manor roadway. Island Club Riverside Phase IV will create 40
single-family lots and six tracts. Two tracts will be used for landscaping, two for utility purposes, one
will be used as a recreation tract, and the remaining tract will be used for stormwater management.
Phases V and VI will be platted separately at a future date, and will be located immediately south of
Phase IV.
At its regular meeting of June 24, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat
approval for the overall subdivision (Phases IV -VI). Subsequently, a land development permit was
issued for Phase IV and the developer commenced construction. The developer is now bonding -out
for the remaining required improvements as part of the final plat approval process. The owner, Beazer
Homes, is now requesting final plat approval and has submitted the following:
1. A final plat for Phase IV in conformance with the approved Island Club Riverside Phases IV -
VI preliminary plat.
2. A cost estimate for the required Phase IV subdivision improvements.
3. A contract for construction for the required Phase IV subdivision improvements.
4. A performance bond to guarantee construction of the required improvements.
ANALYSIS:
At this time, a portion of the required Phase IV subdivision improvements have been completed. The
applicant has submitted a contract for construction for all of the required Phase IV subdivision
improvements, along with a performance bond to secure the contract. The remaining required
improvements include paving, drainage, and utility work. Both the county engineering division and
the utility services department have approved the submitted cost estimate and have verified that the
performance bond amount is adequate to cover the estimated cost of completing the remaining required
improvements. The county attorney's office has approved the construction contract for legal form and
sufficiency and has approved the format of the performance bond.
All applicable requirements regarding final plat approval have been satisfied. Pursuant to the county's
LDRs, the applicant will be required to obtain a certificate of completion after satisfactory completion
of the required improvements. At that time, the applicant will warranty the utility improvements via
a utility services department Bill of Sale. All other improvements will be privately dedicated:
therefore, no warranty maintenance agreement is required.
April 11, 2000
21
BOOK it PAGE 0
•
I
BOOK i i.j PAGE cS
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
plat approval for Island Club Riverside Phase IV and authorize the chairman to sign the contract for
construction and accept the performance bond that guarantees that contract.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Plat
4. Contract for Construction (Draft)
5. Performance Bond (Draft)
Commissioner Stanbridge reported that she had received a call from the Michael
family who have lived along Jungle Trail for many decades. She stated that Gordon Michael
would be showing the Board some photographs of the jungle (on the Jungle Trail) that has
been removed near the area of the Beazer site. She asked the Board's approval to have Mr.
Michael come forward with his photographs.
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating gave a brief overview of the
Island Club Riverside Plat IV which was scheduled for final plat approval at this meeting.
The preliminary plat was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. They have
obtained a land development permit, done some construction and bonded out for the rest;
that information is in the agenda backup. Recently, staff learned that Beazer had done some
clearing in the buffer. They originally had a plan to do required landscaping in the Jungle
Trail buffer; they were going to preserve trees and some wetlands there. He understood the
situation changed somewhat: instead of preserving the wetlands, they bought some credits
in the mitigation bank and they changed their Jungle Trail buffer plan without informing the
County and without approval. In so doing they removed some trees they should not have
removed. Director Keating had requested that the item be removed from the agenda so staff
could work out several issues with the developer. The maximum fine provided is $500 per
April 11, 2000
22
0
tree. Staff estimates there were five large live oak (protected) trees in the buffer and staff
anticipates a fine of about $2,500. They also need to work with the developer to submit a
revised Jungle Trail buffer landscaping plan. It will have to show the developer going over
and above the normal landscape/buffer requirements and mitigation for the trees which were
removed by providing an equal amount of trees. Staff would bring it to the Board when they
feel they have something acceptable and then it would be up to the Board.
Commissioner Stanbridge stated that the Board would be expecting the maximum in
this situation, not saplings or wax myrtle or any other plant that should not be there. The
developer has cut down some irreplaceable trees and a fine is not satisfactory either.
Gordon Michael, 2655 69' Street, grew up along Jungle Trail. He reported that
beginning the previous Wednesday (April 5), the developer completely cleared the whole
buffer zone. There is nothing left. There were no markings, contrary to popular belief, on
any trees. He spoke with one of the employees doing the land clearing and was advised the
crew was told to clear everything. He recalled years before that he had come to the Board
when Indian Trails tried to make a monument of a development there. He called it the
"blame game" with the developer blaming the individuals doing the clearing and the
individuals saying they followed the engineer's plan. In either case the County is getting the
short end of the stick. His concern was that if the developer is not brought to accountability,
then we might as well not even have a Jungle Trail, for it cannot be replaced. There are two
developments going on presently, Bermuda Bay and Island Club. The Bermuda Bay people
have done a good job by hand -clearing the Brazilian peppers and other exotics.
Mr. Michael showed the photographs he had brought with him and they were
displayed on the overhead projector. The photographs were placed on poster boards and
contrasted the differences between how the Island Club clearing had been done versus how
the Bermuda Bay development had been handled. He pointed out that there were not many
April 11, 2000
23
0
BOOK PAGE J
BOOK J13 PAGE 33
Brazilian pepper trees which could have been cleared out by hand in a short period of time.
However, the clearing went on for almost four full days and truckload after truckload was
hauled off. One of the trash piles in his photographs showed oak trees, cabbage palms, pines
and a few Brazilian peppers. (CLERK'S NOTE: These photographs were turned over to
Community Development staff.) He advised that Jungle Trail is now being used by the
Disney Resort as a foot trail along with the vehicular traffic. He had concerns about walkers
being injured because the 15 mph limit is not strictly enforced. He understood from the
management booklet that there were not supposed to be any construction entrances off Jungle
Trail.
Commissioner Stanbridge thought that Director Keating had authorized a temporary
entrance there.
Mr. Michael believed that a $2,500 fine is nothing to the developers, merely a cost
of doing business. He thought the Board ought to get some serious enforcement on Jungle
Trail to insure the future of Jungle Trail and so that developers cannot do these things. He
reported that gumbo -limbo trees, oaks, cabbage palms and many others were removed by this
particular land clearing. Some of the oak trees were between 200 and 300 years old
according to his 81 year old father who has lived in the area his entire life. He believed it
would be difficult to find replacements.
Mr. Michael was told by one of the land -clearing workers that everything was to be
cleared from the south property line to the north property line up to the dirt pile dune (in the
photographs) on the east side of the road.
In response to Commissioner Macht's inquiry, Acting County Attorney Terrence P.
O'Brien stated that the developer was obviously responsible for what was done (by his
agents). He continued that under Florida Statute 125.69 the County could ask the State's
Attorney to prosecute anyone who violates one of our ordinances. Our ordinance provides,
April 11, 2000
24
0 0
in the tree protection area, that the people who destroy specimen trees or historic trees,
mangrove or any dune vegetation shall receive the maximum penalty provided by law, which
is 60 days in jail. So, the County could turn to the State to prosecute. They prosecute like
a misdemeanor but it is not a misdemeanor, it is something just below a criminal offense.
Commissioner Macht commented that 60 days in jail is a very interesting concept.
Next he asked what would prevent the County, by way of remediation, to ask the developer
to replace tree -for -tree. Trees of this size have been transplanted in other sites within the
county. That would go a long way toward making the County whole and would not be
pleasant for the developer to have to do as it would cost a lot of money.
Commissioner Stanbridge also believed it would send a message.
Acting County Attorney O'Brien thought that was within the Board's prerogative.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Grin, to require the developer to replace tree
for tree, diameter for diameter, size for size and species by
species.
Under discussion, Chairman Adams asked if it was possible to identify the trees, and
Director Keating advised that he had a good indication of what was out there and he thought
one of the trees was estimated to be a 24 d.b.h. live oak and there were some other large oak
trees like that. He reported that staff would be meeting with the developer later in the day
to discuss his revised plan for the Jungle Trail buffer area.
Chairman Adams understood they put up a performance bond and asked if the County
could pull that performance bond.
Director Keating responded that in the agenda before them there was the final plat
with a proposed bond which would have been accepted for all the infrastructure
April 11, 2000
25
BOOK 113 PAGE34
i
BOOK i13 PAGE")
improvements that would have been required to complete the plat. They do not put up a
performance bond after preliminary plat approval, only if they want to get final plat approval
and sell lots before they have completed all the infrastructure.
away.
Commissioner Stanbridge estimated that their final plat would be many, many weeks
It seemed to Vice Chairman Ginn that the bond ought to come much sooner and
Commissioner Stanbridge agreed.
Chairman Adams offered an alternative that the bond be extended through the whole
site improvement process, and Vice Chairman Ginn agreed.
Commissioner Stanbridge commented that the developer gets the land clearing permit
and a lot of times that means everything that they want to do they can do because if they
make a "mistake", the fine is there. Sometimes the fine acts as a deterrent, but in this case
it will not.
Vice Chairman Ginn stated that this was a developer from Tampa who only wants to
make a profit; she did not want to see Indian River County turned into Tampa. She thought
the Board should do whatever it has to do to stop it from happening.
Commissioner Macht thought it might be a good idea to ask the County Attorney to
draw up a laundry list of things that the Board thinks would make the County whole and
restore the area as close as possible to what it was.
Vice Chairman Ginn thought they needed to investigate bonding out the preliminary
site plan and even the 60 days in jail. She felt it needed to be somewhere in the Code so that
people knows if it is violated, there will be a heavy penalty.
Mr. Michael thanked the Board and they thanked him for a wonderful job.
Chairman Adams felt there was CONSENSUS to direct the Attorney to draw up
something to make the County whole as stated by Commissioner Macht above.
April 11, 2000
26
Commissioner Tippin recalled that the biggest oak he had ever had moved had a
double trunk and both trunks were 40 -inch d.b.h. Two 60 ton cranes were required to lift it
and he only moved it 72 feet. It can be done and there are specimens that can be found to
replace the ones removed along Jungle Trail.
Chairman Adams restated the motion and Vice Chairman Ginn and Commissioner
Stanbridge looked to Mr. DeBlois to point out the trees on the photographs.
ChiefEnvironmental Planner Roland M. DeBlois usedphotographs to point outwhere
and what kinds of trees and plants were located. He advised that the initial plan that was
approved stated that non-native species were to be removed by hand. There were stretches
of the 30 foot buffer that were native hammock.
Commissioner Stanbridge commented that specimen trees were dispersed throughout
that whole length.
Mr. DeBlois advised that some of the natives were east of the Jungle Trail protection
buffer, but nevertheless hammock areas were taken out by the developer.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carred unanimously.
County Attorney O'Brien confirmed that he would be working with staff.
Director Keating responded to Vice Chairman Ginn and advised that the original plan
involved minor removal ofBrazilianpeppers and re -vegetation and maintaining the oak trees
that were discussed. Sometime after approval, he understood that circumstances changed
with respect to the developer and he went out and cleared the buffer without getting any
approval of a revised plan from staff. There were no revisions received from Masteller and
Moler.
April 11, 2000
,,,_ 27
BOOK 113 FACE �G
BOOK iiJ PAGE 377
Mr. DeBlois pointed out there was actually a pre -construction field meeting with
environmental planning staff to look at the buffer, and the developers was required to stake
out the native areas and remove Brazilian peppers by hand. They were clearly advised
before the work began.
Commissioner Stanbridge added that it has been the norm to ask the developers to go
in and hand clear in areas where there are natives or archaeological sites and there have been
successes in that area. When it is done properly, itis cost-effective to the developer and the
native understory grows back. If he had gone by his plan this time, it would have been very
cost effective.
Vice Chairman Ginn was very concerned that Jungle Trail has really not been
protected, and Commissioner Stanbridge agreed. She felt a 30 foot setback is nothing. There
are a lot of piers and docks being put in as well.
Commissioner Stanbridge recounted that when development on Jungle Trail was
started 30 years ago, 30 feet was all they could get and they were very fortunate to get that
much. It was not easy. Jungle Trail has been designated a Florida Greenway and it is a
wonderful asset for the county, but it has not been dealt with properly. She has spent a lot
of her life protecting that road to get it to this point and she felt the Board needs to make a
concerted effort that this be part of our natural land's inventory (which needs to be
prepared.). Parks are not the same as natural land and they cannot be mixed or we will have
recreational sites on our endangered lands.
Commissioner Macht remarked that he was dissatisfied with the location of the
County's Land Manager and other aspects of the classification.
Chairman Adams interrupted and ruled that this subject was not appropriate at this
time, but he could bring it back in the future.
Commissioner Macht asked that the matter be put on the agenda for next week under
April 11, 2000
28
1* 0
r:
his matters. (Subsequently, the Recording Clerk was advised that Commissioner Macht had
decided the matter would not be brought before the Board.)
U. Appointment of Milt Thomas to the Public Library Advisory
Board by Commissioner Kenneth A Macht
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 4, 2000:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide
Re: PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD
(PLAB) APPOINTMENT)
Date: April 4, 2000
Commissioner Ken Macht's appointment to the Public Library Advisory
Board (PLAB) is Mr. Milt Thomas.
Attachment
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously acknowledged
the appointment of Milt Thomas to the Public Library Advisory
Board (PLAB) by Commissioner Macht.
April 119 2000
BOOK PAGE
•
F, I
BOOK ..c3 FAGE JJ
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-012 -
REZONING APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES FROM RS -6 TO RM -6 AS
QUESTED BY SUN -UP OF INDIAN RIVER, INC. AND OTHERS -
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 5TH STREET SW NEAR EAST
SIDE 27TH AVENUE (QUASI-JUDICIAL
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 28, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M' Keating, , ICP -,/Community Development Director
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning S %�
FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning )
DATE: March 28, 2000
RE: Sun -Up of Indian River, Inc. and Others' Request to Rezone Approximately 40
Acres from RS -6 to RM -6 (RZON 20-01-0135)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 11, 2000.
This request is to rezone approximately 40 acres from RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up
to 6 unitsiacre), to RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 unitstacre). Depicted in
Figure 1 below, the subject property is located on the south side of 5'h Street, SW (Rebel Road), just
east of 27`L Avenue (Emerson Avenue).
The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to allow Sun -Up of Indian River, Inc.
to develop the northern 24 acres of the subject property with a level II or level III group home. That
type of use, while not permitted in the RS -6 district, is permitted as a special exception use in the
RM -6 district.
April 11, 2000
30
Figure 1: Zoning and Location of the Subject Property
RS -6
BIM
5th St., S.W.
INN
T
&i.iamw 1-.M mumME if.t ..... . . . . . .
lz 2ofSubject.,
as ME BE In Property
W�
RM -6
The southern 16 acres of the subject property consist of the northern portion of three parcels that
front on 90, Street, SW (Oslo Road). A significant portion of those parcels is already zoned RM -6.
For the southern 16 acres of the subject property, then, the purpose of the request is to eliminate the
split zoning of the southern three parcels by changing the existing RS -6 zoning of the northern
portion of those tracts to RM -6.
On March 9, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to RM -6.
April 11, 2000
31
E
BOOK 113 PAGE 40
F,
BOOK PAGE
The subject property is zoned RS -6 and primarily consists of scrubby pine flatwoods with 2 or 3
jurisdictional wetlands on-site. Except for several all terrain vehicle trails, the site is undeveloped.
To the north, across 5`" Street, SW, the land also consists of scrubby pine flatwoods and is
undeveloped Other than the ±655 feet closest to 27'" Avenue, which is zoned RM -6, land along the
north side of 5'h Street, SW is zoned RS -6.
To the east of the subject property is the RS -6 zoned Hi -Land Acres Subdivision which, except for
several narrow dirt paths, is undeveloped and consists of scrubby pine flatwoods. That land is
owned by the Indian River County School District and has been designated as the site of a future
south county high school.
South of the subject property, land along 91" Street, SW is generally vacant and zoned RM -6. The
exception is the RMH-6 zoned Holiday Village Mobile Home Park, located at the southeast comer
of 9t' Street, SW and 27" Avenue. Also located on the south side of 9`" Street, SW in this area is the
site of the recently approved 176 unit apartment complex known as The Woods of Vero.
To the west of the subject property, land along 27" Avenue is zoned CL, Limited Commercial
District. The east side of 27" Avenue in this area is undeveloped, while the west side contains a
mixture of retail businesses and residences. Land adjacent to the northwest part of the subject
property, at the southeast corner of 5`" Street, SW and 27`" Avenue, is owned by the Salvation Army
and has two zoning districts --CL along 27`" Avenue and RS -6 further east. The Salvation Army is
currently nearing completion of a multiple -use complex on that site. That complex will include
administration offices, classrooms, an auditorium, a gymnasium, a place of worship, a ball field, and
other uses.
The subject property and all surrounding properties, except those adjacent to the south 1,920 feet of
the subject property's western boundary, are designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, on the
county future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 6
units/acre. Land adjacent to the south 1920 feet of the subject property's western boundary is within
a commercial/industrial node along 27' Avenue, and is designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on
the county future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial
zoning districts.
The subject property and adjacent lands consist of both scrubby pine flatwoods and isolated
wetlands. Gopher tortoises, a protected species, may exist on the site. According to Flood Insurance
Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard areas.
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater service is available to the site
from the South Region Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water service is available to the
site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant.
April 11, 2000
32
0
The site can be accessed by 5`h Street, SW; 91 Street, SW; and 27'h Avenue. Classified as an urban
collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, the segment of 5" Street, SW that abuts
the subject property is a two lane road with approximately 90 feet of public road right-of-way. No
improvements to this portion of 51e Street, SW are currently programmed.
In this area of the county, 9'b Street, SW is a two lane road with 70 feet of public road right-of-way.
Classified as an urban principal arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this
segment of 9`h Street, SW is programmed to expand to three lanes by 2001.
Classified as an urban collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, the segment of
27's Avenue between Sm Street, SW and 0 Street, SW is a two lane road with approximately 65 feet
of public road right-of-way. Although the comprehensive plan indicates a need for an additional 65
feet of public road right-of-way, no improvements to this portion of 27' Avenue are currently
programmed -
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented.
Specifically, this section will include:
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for. Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive
Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development be reviewed
to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's
LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property
and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency
analysis is as follows:
April 11, 2000
33
BOOK h3 PACE 421
I
•
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned:
2. Existing Zoning District:
3. Proposed Zoning District:
4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning District:
5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District:
BOOK M PAGE
f40 acres
RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acre)
RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to
6 units/acre)
240 Single -Family Units
240 Single -Family Units
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's LDRs, projects
which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements. This
rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested zoning would not
increase the allowed density of the site.
Because the most intense use of the property will not increase, changing the property's zoning from
RS -6 to RM -6 will not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities. In this case, a
detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with any new development on site. That
concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. In addition, Future Land
Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service
area
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's future land use
plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district
would allow residential uses no greater than the 6 units/acre permitted by the L-2 designation, the
proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
April 11, 2000
34
43
0
Future Land Use Element Objective 4
Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of
trips on county roads.
The site is located near several employment centers along 9`h Street, SW and 27`" Avenue. Many
people who work in those employment centers live in moderately -priced, multiple -family housing.
The RM -6 zoning district is intended for such uses. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase
the opportunity for people who work in those areas to live near their jobs, thus reducing the length
of their trips to and from work. For this reason, the request implements Future Land Use Element
Objective 4.
Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3
This objective and policy indicate that the county shall allow and encourage a variety of housing
styles, including multiple -family. By allowing multiple -family development on the subject property,
the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 5 and Policy 5.3.
As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all the applicable
objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with
the comprehensive plan.
.mmpati� with the Surrounding Area
The following factors generally indicate that the subject property is appropriate for multiple -family
development:
• The site is located near a major intersection and accessed from two major roads (27th Avenue
and 91h Street, SW);
• The site is adjacent to an existing multiple -family zoning district;
• The site is adjacent to commercially zoned land;
• Adjacent single-family zoned land to the east of the subject property is owned by the Indian
River School District and is unlikely to be developed with single-family uses; and
• Adjacent single-family zoned land to the northwest of the subject property is owned by the
Salvation Army and is also unlikely to be developed with single-family uses.
The following factors indicate that potential impacts on surrounding property could be mitigated:
One hundred twenty feet of road and canal right-of-way separate single-family zoned land
to the north of the subject property from the subject property.
Setbacks provide an additional 40 feet of separation between buildings on the site and
buildings on surrounding property. County land development regulations require multiple -
family developments to provide trees and hedges along thoroughfare plan roads (such as 5`h
April 11, 2000
M,
BOOK. M PAGE 44
BOOK 7 �..ci PAGE 45
Street, SW; 9' Street, SW; and 27`h Avenue) and vegetative buffers and opaque features
where they abut single-family zoning districts.
• Multiple -family projects must go through the site planning process. Through that process
potential impacts can often be mitigated by site design such as the placement of buildings,
parldng areas, open space, stormwater management areas, and landscaping.
For these reasons, staff feels the requested zoning district would be compatible with adjacent
residential development.
Environmental protection regulations for the subject property are the same under both the existing
RS -6 and the requested RM -6 zoning districts. In either case, the county's 10115% set aside
requirement applies to native upland plant communities on site. The isolated wetlands on the site
are protected by federal, state and local regulations. If an environmental survey indicates that listed
species live on the site, federal and state regulations apply. For these reasons, no adverse
environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated.
Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with
surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will
have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most
importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for multiple -family residential
uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from RS -6 to RM -6
by adopting the attached ordinance.
1. Rezoning Application
2. Summary Page
3. Approved Minutes of the March 9, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4. Rezoning Ordinance
April 11, 2000
36
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed the memorandum
using the graphic (figure 1) to illustrate the location and his remarks. He responded to Vice
Chairman Ginn's inquiry concerning the differences between the setbacks for RM -6 versus
UM
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Bruce Barkett, attorney for the applicant, advised that the project had been
coordinated with staff since its inception and that he and Jerry Swanson were present to
respond to any questions.
house.
Rene' Renzi, 340 Waverly Place, Vero Beach, inquired who the "group home" would
Vice Chairman Ginn explained that this request was being made by Sun Up which
is a group of emotionally or developmentally challenged adults whose families are working
towards establishing a home for them. She felt they were doing a fine job, there was a need,
and this should be supported.
Commissioner Tippin knew of situations where many of these handicapped adults'
parents were aging and the parents wanted to know that their children would be cared for
after they were no longer able to care for them personally.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
April 11, 2000
37
BOOK 'M PAGE 4
BOOK M PAGE 47
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 2000-012 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the
accompanying Zoning Map from RS -6, Single -Family
Residential District (up to 6 units /acre), to RM -6, Multiple -
Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), for property
located on the south side of 5' Street, SW, approximately 655
feet east of 27' Avenue, and further described therein,
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-012
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RS -6, SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE), TO RM -6, MULTIPLE -FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF 5"` STREET, S.W., APPROXIMATELY 655 FEET EAST OF 27'x' AVENUE,
AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing for this rezoning
request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
April 11, 2000
38
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 012
THE EAST 991.85 FEET OF TRACT 13, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE
39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN
RIVER FARMS COMPANY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; SAID LAND NOW LYING
AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
oo
PARCEL 1:
THE NORTH 664.79 FEET OF TRACT 12, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 33
SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF
LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 2, PAGE 25, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA; SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
THE NORTH 664.79 FEET OF THE WEST 695.24 FEET OF TRACT 12,
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING
TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER
FARMS COMPANY AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25, ST.
LUCIE COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS. SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND
BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
ALL THAT PART LYING WITHIN THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SAID
TRACT 12 BEING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF INDIAN RIVER FARMS
WATER CONTROL DISTRICT SUB -LATERAL E-7 CANAL.
SUBJECT TO ALL RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND
EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
Km UD
PARCEL 2:
TRACT 12, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,
ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN
RIVER FARMS COMPANY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25, OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; SAID LAND
NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
April 11, 2000
39
•
BOOK 113 FAGE 4
BOOK M PAGE
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-012
LESS AND EXCEPTING THE NORTH 664.79 FEET; THE WEST 40 FEET; AND
THE SOUTH 35 FEET OF THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE WEST 340 FEET
THEREOF.
SUBJECT TO ALL RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND
EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
Be changed from RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), to RM -6, Multiple -
Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on
this 11th day of April, 2000.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 29`h day of March, 2000, for a public
hearing to be held on the 11`x' day of April, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Ken Macht , seconded by Commissioner John Ti ppi n ,
and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave
Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY:`z/nz'k_ `6 04�t�_
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
ATTEST BY:
Jeffrey K. Aailon, Clerk
Inow Avw Ca AOaroved Date
Admin
ere
Legal
, T.
�'��`<�✓
Budget .N
�'
RISk Mgr.
L,i
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
q-IY aopa
April 11, 2000
40
_
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-013
REZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.37 ACRES FROM CG TO RS -6
(COUNTY INITIATED REQUEST) - LOCATED AT NORTHEAST
CORNER OF 27TH AVENUE AND 14TH STREET SW - OWNERS:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS AND KELLY BATTERSEA (QUASI-
JUDICIAL)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEN EEW FOR REARING
IS ON FILE IN TAE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 24, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
D 1NT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Obert k Keating, AICP; Pmmunjty Development Director
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning S ��
FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 24, 2000
RE: County Initiated Request to Rezone ±0.37 Acres From CG to RS -6
(RZON 2000-03-0212)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 11, 2000.
DF.SCRHMON AND CONDITIONS
This is a county initiated request to rezone ±0.37 acres from CG, General Commercial District, to
RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). Depicted in Figure 1, the subject
property is located at the northeast comer of 27" Avenue and 14'x' Street, SW.
On March 9, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to RS -6.
Rarkgmund
When the county's first comprehensive plan was adopted in 1982, the subject property contained a
contractor's business and was allowed to retain its existing legally established commercial zoning
district even though the site was given a residential future land use designation. Subsequently, the
commercial use of the site was discontinued and a residence was established.
April 11, 2000
41
BOOK PAGE i5 Ur
BOOK iii PAGE 51
Figure 1: The Location and Zoning of the Subject Property
The current owner recently acquired the property and applied for an addition to the existing
residential building on the site. Residential uses, except as accessory uses, are non -conforming
within the existing CG zoning district. For that reason, the proposed addition to the existing building
is to expand a non -conforming use. Because county land development regulations do not allow the
expansion of non -conforming uses, staff encouraged the property owner, and he agreed, to allow the
county to initiate a rezoning of the site to RS -6. Therefore, there are two purposes for this request.
The first purpose is to change the zoning of the site to be consistent with both its existing use and
its future land use designation. The second -purpose of this request is to allow the property owner
to build an addition to the existing residential building on the site.
April 119 2000
42
RM -6
�
ra
13th St.
SW
,
woe
--
--
' o�
a
d =.5 c
p
k�
0 N
--
IX
to W d
®� ®� 14th
St. , SW
--
W
y
TT— N
I 1 1
11
I N
I 1 I
1
T
r.
RS -6
1
N
The current owner recently acquired the property and applied for an addition to the existing
residential building on the site. Residential uses, except as accessory uses, are non -conforming
within the existing CG zoning district. For that reason, the proposed addition to the existing building
is to expand a non -conforming use. Because county land development regulations do not allow the
expansion of non -conforming uses, staff encouraged the property owner, and he agreed, to allow the
county to initiate a rezoning of the site to RS -6. Therefore, there are two purposes for this request.
The first purpose is to change the zoning of the site to be consistent with both its existing use and
its future land use designation. The second -purpose of this request is to allow the property owner
to build an addition to the existing residential building on the site.
April 119 2000
42
The CG zoned subject property and land to the north, south, and east are part of the Oslo Park
Subdivision. Except for the subject site and a small area along 9`s Street, SW (Oslo Road) east of
2e Avenue, all lots in Oslo Park are zoned RS -6. Approximately half of the lots in the Oslo Park
Subdivision have been built on.
A legally established non -conforming outdoor storage area exists on the lot directly south of the
subject property.
To the west of the subject property, across 27" Avenue, land is zoned RS -3, Single -Family
Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) and consists of vacant wooded land.
Future Land Use Pattern
The subject property and all surrounding properties are designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2
on the future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities of up to 6
units/acre.
Environment
The subject property, a developed site, is not designated as environmentally important nor
environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. No wetlands or native upland plant
communities exist on the site. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does
not contain any flood hazard areas.
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines extend to the site from the
South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Wastewater lines extend along 27's Avenue from the South
County Wastewater Treatment Plant to 13'x' Street, SW approximately one-eighth of a mile from the
site.
The site is bounded by three roads -27h Avenue; 26`h Court, SW; and 10 Street, SW. Classified as
an urban collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, the segment of 27'' Avenue
that abuts the subject property is a two lane road with approximately 80 feet of public road right-of-
way. Although the comprehensive plan indicates a need for an additional 50 feet of public road
right-of-way, no improvements to this portion of 27`h Avenue are currently programmed.
Twenty-sixth Court, SW and 14`h Street, SW are two lane local roads with 70 feet of public road
right-of-way.
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. The analysis
will include a description of:
• concurrency of public facilities;
• compatibility with the surrounding area;
• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• potential impact on environmental quality.
April 11, 2000
43
BOOIfPAGE 0
BOOK JJJ FAGE
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for. Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The comprehensive
plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable
standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning district. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned:
2. Land Use Designation:
3. Existing Zoning District:
4. Proposed Zoning District:
*037 acres
L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre)
CG, General Commercial
RS -6, Single -Family Residential
5. Most Intense Use Under Existing Zoning District:
*3,700 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6t° Edition ITE Manual).
6. Most Intense Use Under Proposed Zoning District: 2 single-family units
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from
concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the
requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site.
In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with any new development
or changes of use on site. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand
Staff feels that the proposed rezoning will increase the compatibility of development on the subject
property with nearby uses. Surrounded by land zoned for single-family residential uses, the current
commercial zoning of the site is essentially a "spot" zoning that would allow a wide range of retail
commercial uses within a single-family subdivision. In addition, the relatively small size of the site
would make buffering difficult. The proposed rezoning, however, would ensure that only single-
family residential development could occur on the site.
For these reasons, development of the subject property under the requested RS -6 district would be
compatible with surrounding areas.
April 11, 2000
K
0
0- 0
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map; those uses include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial
and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are Future Land Use Element Policies 1.3, 1.4, 1.11 and 1.12.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.3
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.3 states that the county shall. maintain its zoning districts to
ensure the implementation of the comprehensive plan. The subject request would change the zoning
of the subject property from a district that does not implement the comprehensive plan to a district
that does implement the comprehensive plan. For that reason, the subject request implements Future
Land Use Element Policy 1.3.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.4
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.4 states that county land development regulations shall ensure
that adjacent land uses are compatible. As discussed above, the request works to increase
compatibility between the subject property and surrounding property by eliminating a commercially
zoned lot located in the middle of a single-family subdivision. For that reason, the subject request
implements Future Land Use Element Policy 1.4.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that the L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. In addition, that policy
states that those residential uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 specifically allows both single- and multiple -family residential
development with densities up to 6 units/acre within the L-2 land use category.
Because the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's future land
use plan trap and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district
would permit residential uses no denser than 6 units/acre, the proposed request is consistent with
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
While Future Land Use Element Policies 1.3, 1.4, 1.11, and 1.12 are particularly applicable to this
request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff
evaluated the subject request for consistency with all applicable plan policies and objectives. Based
upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
April 11, 2000
45
6UUK ..Ii PAGE i)
BOOK h3 PAGE 55
Environmental protection regulations are the same for both the CG and the RS -6 zoning districts.
Because the subject property is not environmentally significant nor environmentally important,
development of the site will not impact significant natural resources.
The requested zoning increases compatibility with the surrounding area, and is consistent with the
goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezoning the site, as requested, will have
no negative impacts on environmental quality or the provision of public facilities and services. The
subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for residential development. The request
meets all applicable criteria. For those reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from CG to RS -6 by
adopting the attached ordinance.
1. Rezoning Application
2. Summary Page
3. Approved Minutes of the March 9, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4. Rezoning Ordinance
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed the memorandum
using a graphic to depict the location and enhance his remarks.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Grin, the Board 'Imanimously adopted
Ordinance No. 2000-013 amending the Zoning Ordinance and
the accompanying Zoning Map from CG, General Commercial
District, to RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acre), for property located at the northeast comer of 27`ti
Avenue and 14`h Street, S.W., and further described therein.
Apri111, 2000
46
•
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 013
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CG, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, TO RS -6, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO
6 UNITS/ACRE), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 27TH
AVENUE AND 14TH STREET, S.W., AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing for this rezoning
request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
Lots 11 and 12, Block A, Oslo Park, Unit 7, according to the Plat thereof on file in the Office
of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Indian River County, Florida, recorded in Plat
Book 4, Page 28, said lands situate, lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
Be changed from CG, General Commercial District, to RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up
to 6 unitstacre).
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
April 11, 2000
47
BOOK X13 PAGE jo
J
BOOK i 1j f'AGE
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-013
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on
this 11`x' day of April, 2000.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Joumal on the 29' day of March, 2000, for a public
hearing to be held on the I I" day of April, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge , seconded by Commissioner Caroline Ginn ,
and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave
Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Ave
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY:Cc,'K
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
ATTEST BY:
ey K B Cl k �,
� ti y K. a7
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
i�1- ee)
u\v\j\rc\stephens\rzonord.wpd
April 11, 2000
into kvw Ca Aparoved Date
Admin
3 Q-
Legal
/ Ji��•.!
Budget
('
Deal
Risk Mgr.
Ie +
�+
48
D7
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION
PHASES(S) II -D & II -E - SCHEDULED FOR MAY 2. 2000 PUBLIC
HEARING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 4, 2000. The Chairman read the
information into the record.
DATE: APRIL 4, 2000
TO:
MARGARET GUNTER
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY/ASSISTANT
THRU:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY
FROM:
JAMES D. CHASTA
MANAGER OFA MENT PROJECTS
SUBJ:
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM FOR BCC
5/2/00 PUBLIC HEARING
The following item is scheduled for public heating on May 2, 2000:
Sebastian Water Expansion Phase(s) II -D & II -E
Indian River County Project No's UW -97 -13 -DS
& UW -97 -14 -DS
Resolution III
11.C.1. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FORADDITION
AND MODIFICATION TO SHERIFF'S EVIDENCE STORAGE SPACE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 5, 2000:
Date: April 5, 2000
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Through: James E Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, Director, Department of General Servicesi J tci•
Subject: Request for Qualifications (RFQ's) for Addition and Modification to Sheriff's
Evidence Storage Space
April 11, 2000
CS7
BOOK PAGE
BUOK Ji iJ F'AuE 53
BACKGROUND:
On March 9, 2000, the Purchasing Division mailed solicitations to forty six architectural firm
requesting their interest and qualification for improvements and expansion to the Sheriff's
evidence storage space, a project budgeted at $250,000. Advertisements were also made in the
newspaper on March 9th and March 16th. The deadline for submittals was March 29, 2000.
Only one response was received from a firm, Dow Howell Gilmore Associates, Inc. In order to
have some degree of competitive negotiations, it is desirable to have more than one and
hopefully three respondents. I am of the opinion that the County should reject the response by
Dow Howell Gilmore and Associates regretfully since it is the only response and re -solicit
RFQ's hopefully to gain additional responders.
RECOMMENDATION:
Refect the current response and authorize staff to re -advertise the request for qualifications.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously rejected the
sole bid and authorized staff to re -advertise the request for
qualifications, as recommended in the memorandum.
11.C.2. EXCHANGE CLUB'S REQUEST TO USE COURTHOUSE
PARING GARAGE FOR MUSIC FESTIVAL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 2000:
Date: March 29, 2000
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Through: James E Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, Director, Department of General Services /Yw-< (IJ • (JA`
Subject: Exchange Club Request to Use Parking Garage for Music Festival
BACKGROUND:
Last November, the Exchange Club of Indian River held a jazz festival on top of the parking garage across
from the courthouse. They complied with all safety requests, cleanup and indemnification requests of the
County. They are requesting again to use the facility, including sale of alcoholic beverages, on November
4, 2000, from 3:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. The only difference for this coming use is a different orientation
for stage, placing the food vendors on the west side and having artists on the ramp between second level
and the top floor.
Apri111, 2000
50
I sent out an inquiry to Emergency Services, Risk Management, Building and Grounds and Community
Development. Both Risk Management and Building And Grounds responded verbally that there were not
problems and Emergency Services sent a written response (attached). As noted, Emergency Services has
no objections subject to Fire Prevention staff being able to approve all gas or fuel related cooking devices
on site. Further, Fire Prevention would also enforce the fine code for the total event at the parking garage.
The recommendations from the Commumty Development (Building and Fire Prevention) remau► the same
as last year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the use of the facility as requested subject to compliance with all Building and Fire Codes of
Indian River County. Additionally, the Exchange Club will appropriately secure all openings and the roof
parapet walls as they did last year to preclude someone from falling off the structure. Finally, the
Exchange Club shall provide the same type of indemnification as was provide previously, $1,000,000
minimum general liability and $1,000,000 liquor liability insurance.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, to approve staff's
recommendation.
Under discussion, Vice Chairman Ginn inquired if there had been any complaints
about last year's event.
General Services Director Thomas W. Frame responded that there were no complaints
other than a small amount of trash in one of the stairwells.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (Approved the use of the Courthouse
Parking Garage as requested subject to compliance with all
Building and Fire Codes of lndian River County. The Exchange
Club will appropriately secure all openings and the roof parapet
walls as they did last year to preclude someone from falling off
the structure. The Exchange Club shall provide the same type
of indemnification as was provided previously, i.e. $1,000,000
minimum general liability and $1,000,000 liquor liability
insurance.)
April 11, 2000
51
BOOK PAGE 0U
BOOK 113 PAGE Gi
11.G.1. RESOLUTIONNO.2000-042-LOCALAGENCYPROGRAM
AGREEMENT - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -
GIFFORD BIKEPATH WS 1 BETWEEN 37TH AND 45TH.STREETS)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 30, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E.
County Engineer
FROM: Robert S. Skok, Qss_
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Local Agency Agreement for the Gifford Bikepath
DATE: March 30, 2000
Staff is following guidelines for the Comprehensive Bike and
Sidewalk Plan in which constructing an eight foot (81) wide
concrete bikepath along US 1 from 37th Street north to 45`h Street
is planned. This project would connect bicycle and pedestrian
access from the Gifford Community to the Medical District and
Downtown Vero Beach Business District
Indian River County has adopted a Comprehensive Bikeway and
Sidewalk Plan, which identifies roadways where bicycle and sidewalk
facilities should be provided within the County. The Gifford
Bikepath is on the list of priority projects in the Comprehensive
Plan. In 1997, this project was submitted to the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) along with seven others. After
FDOT District IV staff review, all projects were found to be
eligible for enhancement funding. The FDOT has set up a Local
Agency Project (LAP) Agreement in which the Agency (Indian River
County) agrees to design and construct an FDOT approved project,
and the FDOT agrees to reimburse the Agency after its completion.
April 11, 2000
52
0 0
RECOM102MATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends the Board approve the attached LAP Agreement
and authorize the Chairman to execute the same for construction of
the Gifford Bikepath listed in the Comprehensive Plan.
A
1. Resolution
2. LAP Agreement
3. Map of Project Area
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2000-042 authorizing the execution of a local
agency agreement for the Gifford BikepathlSidewalk, along US
1 between 37th Street and 45th Street, with the State of Florida
Department of Transportation.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-042
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTYCOMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A LOCAL AGENCYAGREEMENT FOR THE
GIFFORD BIKEPATH/SIDEWALK, ALONG US 1 BETWEEN
37TH STREET AND 45TH STREET, WITH THE STATE OF
FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and Indian River
County desire to facilitate the constriction of the Gifford Bike Path/Sidewalk; and
WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, has requested Indian
River County execute and deliver to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, a Local
Agency Agreement for the aforementioned project;
NOW, THERE FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman of the Board
is hereby authorized to make, execute, and deliver to the State of Florida, Department of
Transportation, a Local Agency Agreement for the aformentioned project.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioners, Caroline Ginn
who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
April 119 2000
53
BOOK 113 PAGE 6
..�
BOOK �j f -AGE ��
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Ken R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this 11 th day of
Anri 1 , 2000.
Attest:
Jef#ey K. Barton, Cl k
BOARD OF COUNTY CON IISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Q- . Indian River County Approved Date
Administration q)
Budget
Legal ,d
Risk Management —�
Department
Division
-AFDOCUNMNTS IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
11.G.2. RESOLUTIONNO.2000-043-LOCALAGENCYPROGRAM
AGREEMENT FOR THE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD BIKEPATH
ALONG JUNGLE TRAIL TO AlA
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 3, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Directo�
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E ,
County Engineer
FROM: Robert S. Skok,
Civil Engineer
April 11, 2000
54
SUBJECT: Local Agency Agreement for the Old Winter Beach Road
Bikepath
DATE: April 10, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Staff is following guidelines for the Comprehensive Bike and
Sidewalk Plan in which constructing an eight -foot (81) wide
concrete bikepath along Old Winter Beach Road between Jungle Trail
and SR AlA is planned. This project would connect bicycle and
pedestrian access from AIA Corridor to the Scenic Jungle Trail.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Indian River County has adopted a Comprehensive Bikeway and
Sidewalk Plan, which identifies roadways where bicycle and sidewalk
facilities should be provided within the County. The Old Winter
Beach Road Bikepath is on the list of priority projects in the
Comprehensive Plan. In 1997, this project was submitted to the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) along with seven
others. After FDOT District IV staff review, all projects were
found to be eligible for enhancement funding. The FDOT has set up
a Local Agency Project (LAP) Agreement in which the Agency (Indian
River County) agrees to design and construct an FDOT approved
project, and the FDOT agrees to reimburse the Agency after its
completion.
Staff recommends the Board approve the attached LAP Agreement
and authorize the Chairman to execute the same for construction of
the Old Winter Beach Road Bikepath listed in the Comprehensive
Plan.
1. Resolution
2. LAP Agreement
3. Map of Project Area
April 11, 2000
55
BOOK h3 PAGE
BOOK J13 PAGE
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board iinanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2000-043 authorizing execution of a local
agency agreement for the Old Winter Beach Road
Bikepath/Sidewalk between Jungle Trail and SR AlA with the
State of Florida Department of Transportation.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LOCAL AGENCY
AGREEMENT FOR THE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD BIKE
PATH/SIDEWALK, BETWEEN JUNGLE TRAILAND SR AIA,
WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and Indian River
County desire to facilitate the construction of the Old Winter Beach Road Bike Path/Sidewalk; and
WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, has requested Indian
River County execute and deliver to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, a Local
Agency Agreement for the aforementioned project;
NOW, THERE FORE, BE TT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman of the Board
is hereby authorized to make, execute, and deliver' to the State of Florida, Department of
Transportation, a Local Agency Agreement for the aformentioned project.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioners, Caroline Ginn
who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kenneth Macht
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenn R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
April 11, 2000
56
Ll
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this 11 th day
of April ,2000
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By\`T 0--A 6 (ice
FRAN B. ADAMS, CHAIRMAN
•(� Indian River County Approves
Attest- ` Administration W
JEFF Y K. BARTON, CL Budget
I Risk Management I _ I' — I
SAF DOCUMENTS IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF TAE CLERK TO TAE BOARD
11.G.3. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR PAVING 1320' OF 5TH
STREET SW WEST OF 43RD AVENUE - THE ARBOR TRACE
DEVELOPMENT, INC. A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 5, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
1
SUBJECT: Developer's Agreement for Paving 1320' of 5t° Street SW West
of 43rd Avenue - Arbor Trace Planned Development
DATE: April 5, 2000
The developer's of Arbor Trace Planned Development, located along
the west side of 43rd Avenue between Oslo Road (9th Street SW and 5th
Street SW), are required to construct a portion of 5tb Street SW or
pay their fair share for said construction along their
April 11, 2000
57
BOOK ii'd PAGE 66
BOOK iiJ [AGUE 67
approximately 1320 L.F. of frontage. To provide for this
construction, the attached developer's agreement has been prepared.
The contractor is to fund SOC of all costs, with the County funding
the remaining 50% cost. This Agreement is similar to previous
developer's agreements along County Collector Roadways.
The estimated cost of the paving and drainage improvements is
$75,000, plus estimated right of way costs of $50,000. The
estimated cost to both County and developer each is $62,500. The
Alternatives presented are:
Alternative No. 1
Approve the Developer's Agreement.
Alternative No. 2
Deny Approval
RECOMMMATIONS AND FLJNDINC3
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the Developer's
Agreement is approved. Funding to be from Local option Sales Tax
Account #315-214-541.
ZEM
1. Developer's Agreement
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Grin, to approve staff's
recommendation. (Alternative No. 1)
Public Works Director James W. Davis advised that there were a few minor changes
made to the Developer's Agreement.
MOTION AND SECOND WERE WIT DRAWN.
April 11, 2000
58
•
In response to Vice Chairman Ginn's inquiry, Director Davis explained that the turn
lane is not required at this time. Perhaps it will be needed in Phase H and, if so, the
Developer will be required at that time to construct the turn lane.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, Board unanimously approved the revised
Developer's Agreement with The Arbor Trace Development,
Inc.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
ILGA RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 51H STREET SW
BETWEEN 43RD AND 58TH AVENUES - STREET PAVING
IMPROVEMENTS - BERNITA JOHNSTON-HARKINS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 29, 2000:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director
AND
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine
FROM: Ronald L. Callahan, SRA, Right -of --Way Agen
'R L L.
SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition
5'h Street SW between 43rd and 58th Avenues
Street Paving Improvements
Bernita Johnston -Harkins
DATE: March 29, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
An additional 60 feet (60') of right-of-way is needed along the north side of 5'h Street SW
between 43' and 58' Avenues to accommodate a road improvement (paving) project. The owner
April 11, 2000
M
BOOK 113 PAGE
C;
J13
'9 1
BOOK J13 FAGE O
has executed a contract at a negotiated price of $18,000 per acre for this RS -3 zoned land. This
price per acre is comparable to other similar RS -3 zoned parcels the County has purchased based
upon appraisals or evaluations.
The Contract Price for the land is $8,118.00 based upon a total of 0.451acres. There are no
appraisal or attorneys fees. There are other terms in the contract.
Additional Terms
Indian River County, through negotiation, has agreed to the following:
A) To compensate the property owner for 39 citrus trees @ $65.00 each = $2,535.00
Total Contract Price
Contract Price for the land = $ 8,118,00
Additional Compensation = $ 2.535.00
Total Contract Price $10,653.00
Explanation of Counteroffer. The property owner (seller) did not mark through the County's
offer under line item No. 15, Purchase Price. Rather, she marked through line item No. 26,
Balance to close, with her counteroffer and attached an addendum to the contract, which she
signed. In this case, the seller's intentions were clear that her counteroffer was to be $10,653.00.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
None.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the $10,653.00 purchase,
and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract.
Funding will be from Account #315-214-541-066.12.
ATTACHME1_1'I'S
1. Contractladdendum
2. Legal Description
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
Contract for Sale and Purchase with Bernita Johnston -Harkins
in the amount of $10,653.00 and authorized the Chairman to
execute same, as recommended in the Memorandum.
COPY OF CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF TAE CLERK TO THE BOARD
April ll, 2000
0 - 0
•
11.G.5. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 74TH AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS - EDWARD A. & CHERYL E. TILLIS - COUNTY
PROJECT NO. 9803
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 28, 2000:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E
Public Works Directa
Christopher Kafer, P
County Engineer
FROM: William M. Napier, SRPA, SRA `U/1"V/'
Right -of -Way Agent
SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition/County Project No. 9803
74 Avenue Improvements
Edward A. & Cheryl E. Tillis
DATE: March 28, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
An additional thirty feet (30') of right-of-way is needed along the west side of 74'" Avenue
in conjunction with the 741" Avenue Improvements Project. The owners have executed a
contract at a negotiated purchase price of $1.00 per square foot for the A-1 zoned (M-1
Land Use designation) land. This price per square foot is comparable to other similar
parcels the County has purchased based upon appraisals or evaluations.
The Contract Price is $12,421.00 which includes $9,981.00 for land based upon a total
area of 9,981 square feet, and additional compensation of $2,440 for trees and plants, a
well, and fencing within the proposed right-of-way. There are no appraisal or attorney fees.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the $12,421.00 purchase,
and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract.
Funding will be from Account #315-214-541-066.12.
1) Contract
2) Legal Description
3) Attachments
April 11, 2000
61
•
BOOK 113 PAGE 70"
BOOK x..13 PAGE d .L.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
Contract for Sale and Purchase with Edward A. Tillis and
Cheryl E. Tillis, his wife, in the amount of $12,421.00 and
authorized the Chairman to execute same, as recommended in
the Memorandum.
COPY OF CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN TIS OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
11.H.1. NORTH BEACH RO. PLANT CONVERSION - FINAL
CHANGE ORDER, RELEASE OF RETAINAGE AND FINAL
PAYMENT - ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING AMENDMENT - CAMP
DRESSER & MCREE, INC. - TLC DIVERSIFIED, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 3, 2000:
DATE:
APRIL 3, 2000
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU:
DONALD R HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY
PREPARED AND
STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E.
STAFFED BY:
CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
SUBJECT:
NORTH BEACH R.O. PLANT CO ION
FINAL CHANGE ORDER, RELEASE OF RETAINAGE & FINAL
PAYMENT AND ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING AMENDMENT
Prior to the construction of the North County Water Treatment Plant (WTP), Indian River
County operated two water treatment plants (South County and North Beach WTPs). The
emergence of the Sebastian water system and expansion in other area of the County led County
staff to investigate construction of the North County WTP. The North Beach WTP was small
with a limited service area and costly to operate. The Master Plan Update recommended
construction of the North County WTP and Conversion of the North Beach Facility to a booster
April 11, 2000
62
0 0
•
pump station. In June 1997, the County contracted with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) to
assist the County in salvage and sale of treatment process equipment and design, permitting and
construction services for the conversion. The County and CDM successfully negotiated with the
City of Palm Bay for the sale of the treatment process equipment and obtained bids for the
conversion in December 1998.
TLC Diversified, Inc. was awarded the project in January 1999. Contractual completion dates
were October 29, 1999 for substantial completion and November 28, 1999 for final completion.
ANALYSIS
The Contractor has completed contractual work in a timely manner. County Staff
identified additional work with extension days required for project completion. Change Order
No. 1(attached) provides for an extension of the project substantial and final completion dates to
December 11, 1999 and January 31, 2000, respectively. Additionally, Amendment No. 2 to
CDM's work authorization is included to cover the additional general and resident construction
services related to the time extension ($16,145). A breakdown of the contract is as follows:
Description
Cost / Savings Amount
Original Contract Amount
--- $1,507,900.00
Change Order (C.O.) No. 1 - Final Reconciliation
Adjusted Contract Amount
Savings -$85.853.00
$1,422,047.00
Work Completed by Contractor
$1,422,047.00
Total Payments to Contractor thin Jan, 2000
$1,332,974.70
Revised Contr= Price with all Approved COs
Amount $89,072.30
County Staff, CDM Inc. (Engineer -of -Record) and TLC Diversified Inc (Contractor)
worked to reduce costs where possible. Overall the project was $69,708.00 (4.6 percent) under
budget including Final Change Order No. 1 and the additional engineering costs associated with
time extensions.
CONCLUSION
It is Stafi°s recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners Vprove the
following items as outlined above and authorize final payment including release of all retainage
held in the amount of $89,072.30 to TLC Diversified Inc. and authorize Amendment No. 2 for
additional engineering services in the amount of $16,145.
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A. Change Order No. 1 -dated December 14, 1999
Exhibit B. TLC Diversified Inc.- Application for Final Payment dated January 31, 2000
Exhibit C. List of Items Requiring Completion. — Memo dated Feb. 18, 2000 from CDM Inc.
Exhibit D. Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. — Additional Services Amendment No. 2 - Jan. 31, 2000
April 11, 2000
BOOK 43 PACE 7
I
BOOK 113 PAGE E
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved all of
the documents as set out in the memorandum and authorized
final payment including release of all retainage held in the
amount of $89,072.30 to TLC Diversified, Inc. and authorized
Amendment No. 2 for additional engineering services by CDM,
Inc., in the amount of $16,145, as recommended in the
memorandum.
COPY OF DOCUMENTS IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.2. AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE FINAL PAYMENT
INCLUDING ALL RETAINAGE HELD FOR THE 98TH AVENUE
MASTER PLAN WATER AND MASTER PLAN SEWER PROJECT
PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITH ALFRED
SCOPINICH (MAD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 4, 2000:
DATE:
APRIL 4, 2000
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P.
DIRECTOR OF U`111ITY SE E
PREPARED
STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E., CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
AND STAFFED
JEREMIAH K. JOHNSON, E.I., ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINE
BY:
DEPARTMENT OF U`MXI'Y SERVICES
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE FINAL PAYMENT
INCLUDING ALL RETAINAGE HELD FOR:
THE 98" AVENUE MASTER PLAN WATER AND MASTER PLAN SEWER
PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
A developer s agreement between Mr. Alfred Scopinich, who owns a commensal business locked on 98*
Avenue (west of I-95 and south of SR -60), and the County was presented to and approved by the Board of
April 11, 2000
_I
Countv Commissioners on November 2, 1999 (Exhibit -A) for the installation of a 12 -inch Mauer Plan Water
Main and an &inch Master Plan Force Main along the 9e Avenue extending from SR -60 to the Developer s
property. The agteemesit (Exhibit -A) proposed a cost sharing for the installation of water & wastewater
utilities as follows:
Description
I Amount
Developers Share (based on line extension charges)
$12.240.06
County s Share
$167559.94
Total E%tmated Project Cost
$179,800.00
At this time, Mr. Scopinich has completed construction of the proposed water and sewer mains. The
Utility Department has relinquished payment for portions of the completed work and has received
acceptance from the Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection (FDEP) along with the required Record
Drawings. Mr. Scopinich is requesting final payment including the release of all retainage held (Exhibit -
B).
WIP Account No.: 4724)00-169-480.00
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
authorizes the attached Release of Retainage for satisfactory completion of construction services in the amount
of 16109.34 and authorize the Chairman to execute same, as presented.
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A. Copy of Board of County Commission approved Developer Agreement
Exhibit B. Request for Release of Retainage as presented by Developer dated March 20, 2000
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Grin, the Board unanimously approved the
Release of Retainage to Alfred Scopinich for satisfactory
completion of construction services in the amount of $16,109.34
and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as recommended
in the memorandum.
April 11, 2000
65
BOOK I13 F'AGE
Description
Amount
a)
Origmal Estimated Project Cost
$179.800.00
b.)
Actual Project Cost (100.6 completion)
$170.406.00
c).
Paid to Date
$142.056.60
d).
Balance Remaining including retainage held (lure b. mimes line a)
$28.349.40
e.)
Less Developer's Share (line extension charged
512.240.06
Final Payment Due Developer
$16.109.34
WIP Account No.: 4724)00-169-480.00
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
authorizes the attached Release of Retainage for satisfactory completion of construction services in the amount
of 16109.34 and authorize the Chairman to execute same, as presented.
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A. Copy of Board of County Commission approved Developer Agreement
Exhibit B. Request for Release of Retainage as presented by Developer dated March 20, 2000
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Grin, the Board unanimously approved the
Release of Retainage to Alfred Scopinich for satisfactory
completion of construction services in the amount of $16,109.34
and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as recommended
in the memorandum.
April 11, 2000
65
BOOK I13 F'AGE
_I
BOOK ii- PAGE 15
COPY OF DOCUMENTS IS ON FILE
IN TBE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
12. PARTIAL RELEASE OF UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED
WITHIN SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNITS 11, 16, AND 17
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 7, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney
DATE:
DATE: April 7, 2000
SUBJECT: Partial Release of Easements
The City of Sebastian, Florida has assigned to the County all of its right, title and
interest in and to certain platted utility easements located within Sebastian
Highlands, a subdivision, as set forth in the document titled "Assignment of Platt
and Other Easements," dated September 29, 1995, and recorded in the Official
Record Book 1074, Page 140 of the Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida.
Circumstances have now changed wherein certain of those platted utility
easements are no longer needed by the County, because portions of those plats
where said utility easements are shown are being replatted into acreage and
sold to the St. John's River Management District for water management
purposes.
A closing of April 13, 2000 is scheduled and this partial release is necessary so
that the seller can give clear title to St John's.
It Is recommended that the Chairman be authorized to execute the attached
partial release on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners.
TPO/sw
April 11, 2000
In response to Vice Chairman Ginn's question, Utility Services Director Donald R
Hubbs stated that he understood the easements were needed for a major stormwater project
in which case the County would not need these utility easements because there would be no
customers living there.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to execute the partial release of easements, as
recommended in the memorandum.
COPY OF PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENTS IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
B.C.1. COMMISSIONER MRCHT - BRIEF OVERVIEW OF
CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMIT 2000 HELD
MARCH 29, 2000
Commissioner Macht advised that he had attended the Central Florida Regional
Economic Summit 2000 on March 29, 2000, and he had brought back an interactive CD, a
publication and a long video, all of which he will circulate to the Commissioners. He
believed it was important to note that Indian River County had been included in this summit
and felt it important to maintain the relationship. He explained that there are many things
that impinge on what goes on in our county, such as the port at Canaveral which has opened
China to our citrus exports. The Airport Authority in Orange County is one of our windows
on the world and Melbourne Airport seems to have a resurgence of opportunities for
additional flights and better service. He further mentioned that Volusia County has agreed
to host the next meeting of the seven -county consortium.
April 11, 2000
67
BOOK 11" PAGE 1
F,
BOOK M PAGE 77
13.C.2. COMMISSIONER MRCHT - CULTURAL ELEMENT FOR
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Commissioner Macht asked for the Board's concurrence to direct staff to work on a
Cultural Element for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan which the late Commissioner
Carolyn Eggert had moved toward a few years ago. Specifics are needed by staff.
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating stated that several years ago
Commissioner Eggert had indicated that she wanted staff to address cultural activities in the
Comprehensive Plan and, at that time, there were several policies that were added to the
Recreation/Open Space Element. Commissioner Macht had suggested it might be more
appropriate if the County had a separate Cultural Element. He asked the Board to give staff
direction to research and initiate drafting of that element. Staff would then initiate an
amendment of the Comprehensive Plan during the July window for Comprehensive Plan
amendments.
Commissioner Macht recounted some of the benefits brought to the community
because of cultural activities and Vice Chairman Grin concurred that cultural activities
definitely enhance our community.
The Chairman stated there was CONSENSUS to direct staff to work on a Cultural
Element for the Comprehensive Plan.
M.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those Minutes are being
prepared separately.
April 11, 2000
68
•
U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting of the Emergency Services
District, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste
Disposal District. Those minutes are being prepared separately.
U.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 10:10 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved boow 3, o2 UD C)
April 11, 2000
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
BOOK M PAGE 78
•
A