HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/20/2000• MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 2000 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1)
Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman (District 5)
Kenneth R. Macht (District 3)
Ruth M. Stanbridge (District 2)
John W. Tippin (District 4)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION Rev. Marilyn Rieger
Unity Church of Vero Beach
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. Ruth M. Stanbridge
BACKUP
PAGES
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDMONS: 7.N. Resolution Concerning Closing of G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital (Desoto Co.)
7.0. Children's Services Advisory Committee Appointment
10.A. Reschedule Budget Workshops
10.B. Schedule Bargaining Strategy Meeting (IAFF and Teamsters)
13.C. Boat Ramps on West Shore of Indian River Lagoon
REPLACEMENT
PAGES: 7.G. AND 7.M.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Doreen A. Pinkerton
Upon Her Retirement from Indian River County 1
B. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Terrence P. O'Brien
Upon His Retirement from Indian River County 2-3
C. Presentation of Certificates to Census 2000 members and
members of the community who participated in Census 2000
BOCK 113 "rAGE 7
/ `lp'1 ry,
BOOK 1.1jt'AGE Wu�JC
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of June 6, 2000
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
Fellsmere Water Control District (a) District Map and
(b) Annual Budget for FY 1999-00
BACKUP
PAGES
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated June 8, 2000) 4-14
C. Request by Commissioner Stanbridge to attend Historic
Preservation and Historical Museums Special Category
Grants meeting to be held September 19-21, 2000 in
Tallahassee, Florida (no backup provided)
D. Award Bid #2036, Re -bid of Annual Bulk Undried Solar Salt
Contract Due to Notification of Price Increase by Vendor
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000) 15-18
E. Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal
(memorandum dated June 8, 2000) 19-21
F. Contract — Deputy County Attorney
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000) 22-24
G. Contract — Executive Aide to the Commission
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000) 25-27
H. Recently Acquired Property — Tax Cancellation
(memorandum dated June 7, 2000) 28-32
I. Amendment to Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements between County and Beazer Homes
(memorandum dated June 12, 2000) 33-37
J. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated June 8, 2000) 38-39
K. Request for Final Plat Approval for Arbor Trace Phase I
Planned Development
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000) 40-55
L. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #015
(memorandum dated June 14, 2000) 56-57
• •
• •
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES
M. Senior Management Service
(memorandum dated June 14, 2000) 57A -57C
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR
±5 ACRES LOCATED AT 13575 83RD AVENUE,
FROM MED, MEDICAL DISTRICT, TO OCR, OFFICE/
COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND DES-
CRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY
AND Eli. CTIVE DATE
Donald Williamson's request to rezone ±5 acres
located at 13575 831'd Avenue, from MED, Medical
District, to OCR, Office/Commercial/Residential
District (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated June 12, 2000)
2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY
CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR
±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ±249 FEET SOUTH OF CR
512 AND ±235 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM C/I TO
L-1; AND BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIG-
NATION FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF CR 512, ±300 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM
L-1 TO C/I; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND
EFFECTIVE DATE
Paradise Partners, Inc., request to amend the Compre-
hensive Plan to redesignate ±0.63 acres located ±249
feet south of CR 512 and ±235 feet east of CR 510,
from C/I, Commercial/Industrial, to L-1, Low Density
Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre), and rezone those
±0.63 acres from CG, General Commercial District, to
A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres);
and to amend the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate
±0.63 acres located on the south side of CR 512, ±300
BOOK PAGE
58-69
BOOK 1:1j AGE
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.):
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.):
2. (cont'd.)
feet east of CR 510, from L-1, Low -Density Residential -
1 (up to 3 units/acre), to C/I, Commercial/Industrial,
and rezone that ±0.63 acres from CG, General
Commercial District, to A-1, Agricultural District
(up to 1 unit/5 acres) (Legislative)
(memorandum dated June 6, 2000)
3. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
RS -1, RS -3, RM -3, AND CG TO PD FOR APPROXI-
MATELY 446.5 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY
LOCATED NORTH OF THE NORTH RELIEF CANAL,
BETWEEN US#1 AND THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON,
SOUTH OF 63RD STREET; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN,
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EH ECTIVE DATE
Shopco Advisory Corp's request to rezone
approximately 446.5 acres of property from
RS -1 (single family up to 1 unit/acre), RS -3
(single family up to 3 units/acre), RM -3
(residential multi family up to 3 units/acre),
and CG (general commercial) to PD (planned
development) and to receive conceptual PD
plan approval for a development to be known as
River Bend. The subject site is located north of
the North Relief Canal and Grand Harbor, between
US#1 and the Indian River Lagoon, south of 63rd St.
(Legislative)
(memorandum dated June 14, 2000)
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Request by Francis M. Coffey to comment on the
proposals for the North County Recreation Complex
(letter dated June 14, 2000)
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
Scheduled for Public Hearing on July 11, 2000:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS CONCERNING
THE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
BACKUP
PAGES
70-104
105-140
141
142-143
• •
• •
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B. Emergency Services
Request to set a Public Hearing date regarding an Application
for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for a
Class E Certificate from We Care of the Treasure Coast to Pro-
vide Non -Emergency Baker Act Interfacility Ambulatory
Transports
(memorandum dated June 9, 2000)
C. General Services
1. Award Bid #2046 and Approval of Agreement for
Installation of Preconditioning Unit for Health Dept.
(memorandum dated June 12, 2000)
2. Internet Procurement Agreement with DemandStar.
com, Inc.
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000)
3. Revised Agreement with Edlund & Dritenbas Archi-
tects, P.A. for Design and Constructions Services for
an Addition to the North County Library located in
Sebastian on C.R. 512
(memorandum dated June 5, 2000)
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
Health Insurance RFP #2044
(memorandum dated June 14, 2000)
G. Public Works
1. Right -of -Way Acquisition
5th Street SW between 43rd and 58th Avenues
Street Paving Improvements
Charles R. Sexton, Jr.
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000)
BACKUP
PAGES
144
145-149
150-174
175-265
266-284
285-293
BOOK '��; ['AGE L'u J
BOCK rAGE �1'
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
G. Public Works (cont'd.):
2. Kings Highway Phase I Change Order No. 5
and Final Release of Retainage
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000)
H. Utilities
1. Developer's Agreement for Chesser Gap Charter
School Sebastian, FL— Water Main Construction
(memorandum dated June 13, 2000)
2. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement Su -
Rene Mobil Home Park — Wastewater Treatment
Facility
(memorandum dated June 6, 2000)
3. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement
Aquarina — Wastewater Treatment Facility
(memorandum dated May 31, 2000)
4. Developer's Agreement for Citrus Springs Develop-
ment Master Planned Water Main & Force Main
Construction
(memorandum dated June 6, 2000)
5. South County Water Treatment Plant Engineering
Services for Well System Rehabilitation
(memorandum dated June 12, 2000)
I. Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Fran B. Adams
B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
C. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
BACKUP
PAGES
294-302
303-317
318-322
323-327
328-335
336-349
• •
• •
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd.):
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of minutes — meeting of June 6, 2000
2. Approval of minutes — meeting of June 13, 2000
BACKUP
PAGES
3. Award Bid #2047 Purchase of Ten (10) Open Top
Roll -Off Containers
(memorandum dated June 8, 2000) 350-357
4. Residential Recycling Collection Services
(memorandum dated June 6, 2000) 358-364
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bcc1.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p.m.
COCK 1 d rAGEIli j J
• •
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER 1
2. INVOCATION 1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA 1
5.A. PROCLAMATION - DOREEN A. PINKERTON ON RETIREMENT FROM
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (SOIL CONSERVATION) 2
5. B. PROCLAMATION AND RETIREMENT AWARD HONORING TERRENCE P.
O'BRIEN (COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE) 5
5.C. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES TO CENSUS 2000 COMPLETE COUNT
COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY WHO
PARTICIPATED IN CENSUS 2000 7
7. CONSENT AGENDA 8
7.A. Reports 8
7.B. Approval of Warrants 8
7.C. Request by Commissioner Stanbridge to Attend Historic Preservation and
Historical Museums Special Category Grants Meeting - Tallahassee -
September 19-21, 2000 17
7.D. Bid Award #2036 - Re -Bid of Annual Bulk Undried Solar Salt Contract
Due to Notification of Price Increase by Current Vendor (Morton Salt Co.)
17
7.E. Equipment Declared Surplus for Sale or Disposal 19
7.F. Contract for Deputy County Attorney William G. Collins II (First Annual)
21
7.G. Contract for Executive Aide to the Board Kimberly E. Massung (First
Annual) 22
1
SOCK k.
Jr"AuEU_
BOOK 113 rAGE 6 j 7
7.H. Resolution Nos. 2000-067 and 2000-068 - Tax Cancellation on Recently
Acquired Properties - Right of Way 5th Street SW (Johnston -Harkins) and
Right of Way 57th Avenue (Buckner) 23
7.I. Beazer Homes - Addendum to Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements (Island Club Riverside -FPL) 29
7.J. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs 31
7.K. Arbor Trace Phase I Planned Development (formerly known as Oak Trace)
- Final Plat Approval 32
7.L. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #015 34
7.M. Senior Management Service - Contract for Assistant County Administrator
36
7.N. Resolution No. 2000-069 - Urging the Governor to Stop the Closing of G.
Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital in Desoto County 37
7.0. Children's Services Advisory Committee - Appointment of Donna Maurer
(replacement for Inez Fielding who had resigned) 39
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-017 - REZONE ±5 ACRES AT
13575 83RD AVENUE FROM MED TO OCR AT REQUEST OF DONALD
WILLIAMSON 40
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PARADISE PARTNERS, INC. REQUEST TO AMEND
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±0.63 ACRES FROM
C/I TO L-1, AND REZONE THOSE ±0.63 ACRES TO CG TO A-1 (SUBJECT
PROPERTY 1: APPROXIMATELY 249' SOUTH OF CR 512 AND
APPROXIMATELY 235' EAST OF CR 510); AND AMEND THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±0.63 ACRES FROM L-1 TO
C/I AND REZONE THOSE ±0.63 ACRES FROM A-1 TO CG (SUBJECT
PROPERTY 2: SOUTH SIDE OF CR 512, APPROXIMATELY 300' EAST OF
CR 510) 48
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-018 - REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 446.5 ACRES TO PD AND CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN
APPROVAL FOR RIVER BEND - REQUEST OF SHOPCO ADVISORY CORP.
60
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY COMMENTS ON THE
PROPOSALS FOR THE NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMPLEX ... 81
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 11, 2000:
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE
DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS 84
2
• •
•
10.A. CONSIDER RESCHEDULING BUDGET WORKSHOP MEETINGS ...... 84
10.B. SCHEDULE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY MEETING (IAFF
AND TEAMSTERS) ............................................ 85
11.B. REQUEST TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE - APPLICATION FOR A
CLASS E CERTIFICATE FROM WE CARE OF THE TREASURE COAST TO
PROVIDE NON -EMERGENCY BAKER ACT INTERFACILITY
AMBULATORY TRANSPORTS .................................. 86
i 1.C.1. AWARD BID #2046 AND APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PRECONDITIONING UNIT FOR HEALTH
DEPARTMENT (IRVINE MECHANICAL, INC.) ................ 87
11.C.2. INTERNET PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT - DEMANDSTAR.COM,
INC..................................................... 89
11.C.3. NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY ADDITION - REVISED AGREEMENT
WITH EDLUND & DRITENBAS ARCHITECTS FOR DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ............................... 91
l l.F. RFP #2044 - EMPLOYEE HEALTH, LIFE, AND LONG-TERM
DISABILITY INSURANCE - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF
FLORIDA (MODIFIED PLAN), BRADMAN/UNIPSYCH,
ARMS/LINCOLN RE (STOP LOSS) MODIFIED BCBS PLAN,
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE (LIFE), AND UNUM INSURANCE
COMPANY (LONG-TERM DISABILITY) ..................... 93
11.G.1. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 5TH STREET SW (BETWEEN 43RD
AND 58TH AVENUE) STREET PAVING IMPROVEMENTS -
CHARLES R. SEXTON, JR .................................. 95
ll.G.2. KINGS HIGHWAY (58TH AVENUE) PHASE I - DICKERSON
FLORIDA, INC. - CHANGE ORDER NO.5 AND FINAL RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE ............................................ 96
11.H.1. SEBASTIAN CHARTER JUNIOR HIGH, INC. - DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT FOR WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION AT CHESSER
GAP CHARTER SCHOOL IN SEBASTIAN .................... 98
3
BOOK "A,E ':J'
•
BOOP( i1j" PAGE!;
l l.H.2. SU -BENE MOBILE HOME PARK - DOMESTIC WASTEWATER
RESIDUAL AGREEMENT BY IRENE DONATELLI, AS OWNER .. 99
l l.H.3. AQUARINA DEVELOPMENT (MELBOURNE BEACH) DOMESTIC
WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT WITH JOHN BATES FOR
SERVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC . .................. 101
ll.H.4. THE SUNTREE PARTNERS (CITRUS SPRINGS) DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF OFF-SITE UTILITIES
(MASTER PLANNED WATER MAIN AND FORCE MAIN) ...... 102
l l.H.5. SOUTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT ENGINEERING
SERVICES FOR WELL SYSTEM REHABILITATION - CAMP
DRESSER & MCKEE, INC.- ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK
AUTHORIZATION NO. 13
...................................................... 104
13.C. COMMISSIONER MACHT - REPLACEMENT BOAT RAMPS ON
WESTERN SHORE OF INDIAN RIVER LAGOON (OSLO ROAD &
HARMONY OAKS SITES) ................................. 107
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ........................ 107
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ....................... 107
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ..................... 107
.19
June 20, 2000
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, June 20, 2000. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Caroline D. Ginn, Vice
Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; Ruth Stanbridge; and John W. Tippin. Also present were
James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney;
and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. Chairman Adams had to leave the meeting just prior to
10 a.m. to go out of town on County business.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. 11WOCATION
Rev. Marilyn Rieger, Unity Church of Vero Beach, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Stanbridge led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Commissioner Macht asked for the addition of item 13.C., Replacement of boat ramps
on the western shore of the Indian River Lagoon.
June 20, 2000
1
BOOK J3
J
r--
BOOK �..�� F'AGE
Chairman Adams announced the additions of 7.N., a Resolution urging the Governor
to stop the closing of G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital in DeSoto County; and 7.0.,
Appointment of Donna Maurer by Chairman Adams to the Children's Services Advisory
Committee (to replace Inez Fielding).
Vice Chairman Ginn pointed out that there were replacement memoranda for items
7.G. and 7.M.
Vice Chairman Ginn then requested the addition of the County Administrator's
memorandum for a proposed rescheduling of the Budget Workshop Meetings (designated
as 10.A.).
Chairman Adams pointed out a second paragraph in that memorandum that they also
needed to schedule a bargaining strategy meeting (IAFF and Teamsters) for sometime during
the week of June 26, 2000 (designated as 10.B.).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously added the above
items to the agenda and accepted the replacement memoranda.
5.A. PROCLAMATION - DOREEN A. PINKERTON ON
RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (SOIL
CONSERVATIONI
Chairman Adams read aloud the following proclamation and retirement award and
presented both to Doreen Pinkerton who accepted them with thanks and a short story about
coming to Vero Beach and being hired for her job with the County.
June 20, 2000
OA
_I
0
PROCLAMATION
HONORING DOREEN PINKERTON ON HER RETIREMENT
FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EFFECTIVE JUNE 30, 2000
WHEREAS, DOREEN has announced her retirement as an Administrative Assistant to the Indian River County
Soil and Water Conservation District effective June 30,2000; and
WHEREAS, DOREEN has been employed with Indian River County since June 30,1975. Duringher tenure with
Indian River County, Doreen has served as a secretary at Road and Bridge and than transferred to the Agriculture Extension
Office where she was promoted to Senior Secretary in 1979. Then in 1982, she was promoted to the position of
Administrative Secretary. In 1990, Doman again moved to a new challenge becoming the Administrative Secretary for the
Indian River County Soil and Water Conservation District. In 1993, she was reclassified to the position of Administrative
Assistant which is the position she holds today; and
WHEREAS, DOREEN has been the key administrative person on behalf of the elected Board of Supervisors of
the Soil and Water Conservation District. She has aided the Board ofSupervisotscollectivelyandindividuallywithelection
requirements, office holder regulations, parliamentary procedures, and other related assistance and
WHEREAS, DOREEN has been instrumental in providing all the general office, secretarial and administrative
support to the Soil and Water Conservation District by setting the many agenda and recordings of minutes, maintaining
financial accounts on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, aiding in the writing of grants, supervising and coordinating the
activities of volunteers, and providing overall office management; and
WHEREAS, DOREEN has played a lead role in the major environmental education programs for the youth of
Indian River County and the Treasure Coast by initiating the Envirothon with the presentation of programs at school
environmental, career and science fairs. She has undauntedly prepared and set up displays, and planned and coordinated
programs, coordinated with educational staff and School District administration in the furtherance of the environment and
the Soil and Water Conservation District goals; and
WHEREAS, DOREEN has been both a citizen and a public servant striving for the betterment of both the
community and its environment through her long years of unselfish service to the public;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr PROCLADdED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMNHSSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board expresses its deepappremation for the dedicated serviceDOR.EEN
PIIHKERTON has given to Indian River County over the past twenty five years;
The Board and the Soil and Water Conservation District of Indian River County wish to express their appreciation
to Doreen for an outstanding career on behalf of Indian River County and extend our heartfelt wishes for her success in her
future endeavors.
Adopted this 201° day of June, 2000.
June 20, 2000
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
t-'�-'L'
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
BOOR rAE
e
June 20, 2000
BOOK i I 3y rA G E G;'3
12"
This is to rertify that
is 4urby prefientieb this
for autatunhittg Vzrfgrmmmje anh faithful
struire to
-IAW4 *0.4
for
pars of seruirr
Bit thio 30tA i1tt1J of
219 00
Nw�amra�nwc�•tmotsu•avo Fro
4
5. B. PROCLAMATION AND RETIREMENT AWARD HONORING
TERRENCE P. 09BRIEN (COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE)
Chairman Adams read aloud the following proclamation and retirement award. In
accepting both, Acting County Attorney O'Brien advised that it had been a pleasure to serve,
spoke of the cooperation he had received from other staffers which had made his job much
easier, and expressed his thanks to all.
Commissioner Tippin quipped that after all these years of being in government, I
finally met a semi -humble attorney and it has been a wonderful experience.
June 20, 2000
PROCLAMATION
HONORING TERRENCE P. O'BRIEN
ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
EFFECTIVE JUNE 20,2M
WHEREAS, TERRY O'BRIEN began county employment on April 23, 1490, as Asustant
County Attorney I; and
WHEREAS, TERRY'S position was upgraded to Assistant County Attorney li In Wernher,
1990, which was the position held until he was appointed Acting County Attorney; and
WHEREAS. TERRY has always received excellent evaluations, with the majority of his
evaluations indicating what a pleasure he is to work with; and
WHEREAS, upon joining the County st4 TERRY rewrote Volume One of the Indian River
County Code and served as Legal Counsel to the Code Enforcement Board for to years; and
WHEREAS, TERRY handled duction litigation over the Indian RiverCounty Comdumse
to a succesdal conclusion. He was an essential member of the team implementing the enviro mental
lands bond issue through the purebase of envimnmentally sensitive hinds. He handled eminent domain
oases, which allowed the County to go forward with needed road improvements; and
WHEREAS, TERRY O'BRIEN capably and elTciendy served as Acting County Attorney
from February 1, 2000, until his rathemeat
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLADM BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board mrpresses its deep
appreciation for the services TERRENCE P. O'BRIEN has penFormed on behalf of Indian Riva
County.
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that our heartfelt wishes for a long and happy mtirernant
ga with him. We will miss him and we wish him well in all his fixture endeavom
Adopted this 20th day of June, 2000.
E
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Fina B. Adams, Chairman
BOOK hJ CAGE
r
r. ��r,
BOOK JJJ PACE GID
•�t��fi �_"� � i; k �'+_.Y}U..��_ _f".~."fa-r�'���C� • i44 L .��'i, ''�_a-..•:°_...,�J Lt
,&&C" RA4e4 eOW411�
gle4a 12eac4, 4�k4id'a
014 s is to rectify t4at
7evzanc p 0 �9�
is hereby presenfed f lis
etimment Awarb
for outstanding }terfurmm a and faithful
seruire to
yadia4-t av" eOu4
1-110"d q &4014G'r r W
for lea years of seruirr
Vi. on this 20l� day of 211�Q
Aw.aceo.e.da,. - -(8771 oa
June 20, 2000
•
•
5.C. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES TO CENSUS 2000
COMPLETE COUNT COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND MEMBERS OF
THE COMMUNITY WHO PARTICIPATED IN CENSUS 2000
Vice Chairman Grin, chairman of the Census 2000 Complete County Committee,
presented Awards of Excellence and Outstanding Community Service certificates to the
recipients who were present. She abundantly thanked everyone of them for their specific
roles in Census 2000 in Indian River County. (CLERK'S NOTE: List of recipients and
samples of certificates have been filed with the backup of the meeting in the office of the
Clerk to the Board.)
Vince Simpson, Local Census Office Manager (Ft. Pierce), expressed appreciation
to Vice Chairman Ginn and her team. He indicated that the results for Indian River County
look good. He estimated that 35,000 census forms were mailed back and 221000 doors were
knocked on. The final phase of Census 2000 will be in July when another 4-5,000
households will be contacted for census information.
Vice Chairman Ginn expressed special thanks to the county & municipalities for
putting bumper stickers on all their service vehicles. The button campaign was successful
thanks to the cooperation of Publix, Winn Dixie, and WalMart. She expressed special
thanks to Profold for their role in folding all the fliers for easier stuffing in the utility billing
envelopes. She thanked the volunteers who stuffed those envelopes as well as the Utilities
Department, Mail Room, Buildings & Grounds, and other Indian River County stafffor their
excellent cooperation. She presented a plaque and paid special recognition to Cindy
Delstanches, who acted as secretary for the committee, for her effort, administration, follow-
through and creativity.
June 20, 2000
7
BOCK r'AGE '
•
nu rAGE
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Adams requested that item 7.D. be separated from the Consent Agenda for
clarification.
7.A. RRgports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
Fellsmere Water Control District (a) District Map and (b)
Annual Budget for FY 1999-2000
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 8.2000:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: JUNE 8, 2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of May 31, 2000 to June 8, 2000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
May 31 -June 8, 2000, as requested.
June 20, 2000
8
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0020583
ADAIR, SUSIE CLARK
2000-05-31
212.00
0020584
KISSIMMEE, CITY OF
2000-05-31
304.22
0020585
WHITTINGTON, PENNY
2000-06-06
571.20
0020586
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND
2000-06-07
991.47
0020587
FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM
2000-06-07
256,017.65
0020588
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
2000-06-07
138.50
0020589
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
2000-06-07
92.31
0020590
VELASQUEZ, MERIDA
2000-06-07
200.00
0020591
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
2000-06-07
225.00
0020592
IRS - ACS
2000-06-07
50.00
0020593
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
2000-06-07
521.88
0020594
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
2000-06-07
2,325.00
0020595
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
2000-06-07
80,911.59
0020596
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA)
2000-06-07
1,160.30
0020597
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
2000-06-07
231.03
0020598
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE
2000-06-07
162.86
0020599
NACO/SOUTHEAST
2000-06-07
7,844.08
0020600
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
2000-06-07
438.45
0020601
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
2000-06-07
23.08
0020602
FL SDU
2000-06-07
6,337.49
0020603
FL SDU
2000-06-08
186.53
0283853
A A FIRE EOUIPMENT, INC
2000-06-08
1,301.35
0283854
ACTION PRINTERS
2000-06-08
73.30
0283855
ALBERTSONS SOUTHCO #4357
2000-06-08
39.60
0283856
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
2000-06-08
20.94
0283857
ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
2000-06-08
323.50
0283858
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
2000-06-08
18.31
0283859
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
2000-06-08
1,160.20
0283860
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
2000-06-08
349.30
0283861
AT EASE ARMY NAVY
2000-06-08
1,257.00
0283862
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2000-06-08
1,276.10
0283863
ABS PUMPS, INC
2000-06-08
2,171.34
0283864
ANKENY, JOHN
2000-06-08
39.99
0283865
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
2000-06-08
59.90
0283866
A A ELECTRIC BE, INC
2000-06-08
155.04
0283867
AMERICAN AIR FILAR INT'L
2000-06-08
1,392.71
0283868
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2000-06-08
111.10
0283869
A T & T
2000-06-08
124.57
0283870
A B C CUTTING CONTRACTORS, INC
2000-06-08
447.00
0283871
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
2000-06-08
9.97
0283872
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
2000-06-08
45.44
0283873
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
2000-06-08
5,127.90
0283874
APPERSON CHEMICALS,INC
2000-06-08
3,091.52
0283875
ARCH PAGING
2000-06-08
185.28
0283876
A T & T
2000-06-08
503.07
0283877
AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION
2000-06-08
127.11
0283878
ALTER, ARLEEN
2000-06-08
55.39
0283879
A T & T MEDIA SERVICES
2000-06-08
100.00
0283880
ABC AUDIOBOOKS FOR CHILDREN
2000-06-08
144.00
0283881
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
2000-06-08
74.95
0283882
B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
2000-06-08
297.88
0283883
BAIRD, JOSEPH A
2000-06-08
189.00
0283884
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
2000-06-08
836.33
0283885
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
2000-06-08
2,490.75
0283886
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2000-06-08
7,014.84
0283887
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
2000-06-08
13.50
0283888
BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD
2000-06-08
500.00
June 20, 2000
7
BOOK IJ rAu'E
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0283889 BARTON, JEFFREY K
0283890
2000-06-08
5,000.00
BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-06-08
8,195.49
0283891 BAKER & TAYLOR INC
2000-06-08
3,827.58
0283892 BRODART CO
0283893
2000-06-08
4,451.36
BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE
0283894
2000-06-08
200.00
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
0283895
2000-06-08
755.97
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
2000-06-08
75.75
0283896 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
2000-06-08
30.97
0283897 BASE CAMP OUTLET
2000-06-08
349.65
0283898 BMG
0283899 BROWN, SABRINA
2000-06-08
66.45
0283900 BASS-CARLTON SOD INC
2000-06-08
2000-06-08
9.00
0283901 BUCKNER, JACK AND
2000-06-08
289.00
4,000.00
0283902 BELLSOUTH
2000-06-08
333.99
0283903 CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
2000-06-08
224.10
0283904 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
0283905
2000-06-08
25,899.25
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
0283906
2000-06-08
30,395.20
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
2000-06-08
1,629.81
0283907 CHLORINATORS, INC
2000-06-08
139.43
0283908 CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC
2000-06-08
0283909 CITRUS MOTEL510.00
2000-06-08
180.00
0283910 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
2000-06-08
658.93
0283911 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
2000-06-08
126.00
0283912 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
61,739.01
0283913 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
2000-06-08
28,133.56
0283914 COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF
2000-06-08
3,511.26
0283915 CLAY'S ASPHALT MAINTENANCE,INC
2000-06-08
0283916 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
2000-06-08
200.00
0283917 CINDY'S PET CENTER, INC
2000-06-08
98,82
6.89
0283918 CONTROL TECHNIQUES DRIVES,INC
2000-06-08
1,207.99
0283919 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
2000-06-08
0283920 CYBERGUYS
2000-06-08
68.25
0283921 CLEARVIEW SATELLITES
2000-06-08
367.97
0283922 CSR AMERICA, INC.
2000-06-08
900.00
940.13
0283923 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
2000-06-08
0283924 COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF
2000-06-08
57.00
0283925 CRIMES COMPENSATION TRUST
2000-06-08
42.99
0283926 COMPLETE MARINE SERVICES
2000-06-08
26.75
0283927 COLUMBIA PROPANE
2000-06-08
1,196.58
0283928 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
2000-06-08
12,73
0283929 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2000-06-08
303.80
0283930 DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
2000-06-08
3,645.59
0283931 DICKERSON-FLORIDA INC
2000-06-08
947.57
0283932 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY
-08
1,694.44
0283933 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
2000-06-08
186.99
0283934 DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
2000-06-08
172.73
0283935 DATA SUPPLIES, INC
2000-06-08
1,862.16
0283936 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2000-06-08
200.08
0283937 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
2000-06-08
500.00
0283938 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2000-06-08
694.50
0283939 DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE
2000-06-08
500.00
0283940 DADE PAPER COMPANY
2000-06-08
625.00
0283941 DAVIS, BRENDA
2000-06-08
898.91
0283942 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
2000-06-08
8,99
0283943 DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC
2000-06-08
62.23
0283944 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
2000-06-08
28,75
0283945 DEBENEDICTS, ANTHONY & DOMENI
2000-06-08
14,635.60
0283946 DELZ, JUDY
2000-06-08
9.88
0283947 DIVELLA, KATHY
2000-06-08
62.43
75.00
June 20, 2000
10
BOOK hJ PAGE
•
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0283948 ERRETT, NANCY
2000-06-08
145.26
0283949 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
2000-06-08
2,824.56
0283950 ESSCO PUMPS & CONTROLS
2000-06-08
127.89
0283951 EAST COAST ZOOLOGICAL
2000-06-08
75.00
0283952 ELEMENT K JOURNALS
2000-06-08
69.00
0283953 FERE%
2000-06-08
36.94
0283954 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2000-06-08
500.00
0283955
FLORIDA BAR, THE
2000-06-08
220.00
0283956
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
2000-06-08
1,241.40
0283957
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
2000-06-08
10,460.14
0283958
FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK
2000-06-08
505.00
0283959
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
2000-06-08
53.06
0283960
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
2000-06-08
6,899.76
0283961
FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
2000-06-08
484.47
0283962
FIRE CHIEF
2000-06-08
54.00
0283963
FLORIDA FIRE MARSHALL'S
2000-06-08
125.00
0283964
FLOW -TECHNOLOGY
2000-06-08
5,848.77
0283965
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
2000-06-08
81,556.00
0283966
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
2000-06-08
60.00
0283967
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF C P A'S
2000-06-08
185.00
0283968
FALZONE, KATHY
2000-06-08
187.36
0283969
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
2000-06-08
6,358.00
0283970
FATHER & SON CARPET, INC
2000-06-08
65.00
0283971
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
2000-06-08
74.00
0283972
FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC
2000-06-08
100.00
0283973
FIRE SAFETY STICKERS
2000-06-08
80.00
0283974
FACTS ON FILE INC
2000-06-08
197.66
0283975
FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
2000-06-08
200.00
0283976
FAPPO, INC
2000-06-08
60.00
0283977
FINISHMASTER INC
2000-06-08
135.99
0283978
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
2000-06-08
581.46
0283979
FOSTER MANAGEMENT
2000-06-08
12,601.34
0283980
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
2000-06-08
1,963.41
0283981
GALE GROUP, THE
2000-06-08
382.34
0283982
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
2000-06-08
167.92
0283983
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
2000-06-08
169.00
0283984
GENERAL GMC, TRUCK
2000-06-08
366.00
0283985
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
2000-06-08
228,47
0283986
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-06-08
197.47
0283987
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
2000-06-08
181.06
0283988
GOLD STAR OF THE TREASURE
2000-06-08
711.00
0283989
GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTS
2000-06-08
8,893.21
0283990
GOLLNICK, PEGGY
2000-06-08
535.50
0283991
GORHAM, JONATHAN
2000-06-08
74.68
0283992
GRIFFITH JR, EUGENE P
2000-06-08
500.00
0283993
HAMMOND & SMITH, P A
2000-06-08
12,700.00
0283994
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
2000-06-08
23.33
0283995
HARRISON UNIFORMS
2000-06-08
197.46
0283996
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
2000-06-08
0283997
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
2000-06-08
524.58
0283998
RACE COMPANY
2000-06-08
140.00
0283999
HILL MANUFACTURING
2000-06-08
41.00
0284000
HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER
2000-06-08
510.77
0284001
HATFIELD, ERIC
2000-06-08
15.00
310.00
0284002
H L TREMBLAY, INC
2000-06-08
0284003
HOME DEPOT
2000-06-08
850.00
0284004
HAZ-MAT DQE
2000-06-08
99.98
0284005
HOLMES, EDWARD
2000-06-08
1,258.00
90.00
June 20, 2000
11
�J
k�,
600K � rAGE �".J o
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0284006
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-06-08
85.00
0284007
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
2000-06-08
753.66
0284008
INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
2000-06-08
383.70
0284009
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
2000-06-08
4,151.66
0284010
INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER
2000-06-08
250.00
0284011
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
2000-06-08
9,944.71
0284012
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
2000-06-08
163.61
0284013
ISIS PUBLISHING
2000-06-08
628.27
0284014
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
2000-06-08
977.50
0284015
INSURANCE SERVICING &
2000-06-08
850.00
0284016
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
2000-06-08
285.57
0284017
INTERIM PERSONNEL
2000-06-08
408.00
0284018
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY
2000-06-08
10,658.08
0284019
INTERFACE ELECTRONICS, INC
2000-06-08
1,372.00
0284020
IKON TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION
2000-06-08
1,556.00
0284021
INTERIM COURT REPORTING
2000-06-08
81.00
0284022
IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
2000-06-08
561.48
0284023
JACKSON ELECTRONICS
2000-06-08
39.20
0284024
JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
2000-06-08
130.20
0284025
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
2000-06-08
3.74
0284026
JUPITER BEACH RESORT
2000-06-08
340.00
0284027
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
2000-06-08
396.09
0284028
J A SEXAUER INC
2000-06-08
1,808.97
0284029
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
2000-06-08
1,287.99
0284030
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
2000-06-08
526.35
0284031
JEFFERSON. CHRISTOPHER A
2000-06-08
20.00
0284032
JACOBS, JEREMY
2000-06-08
10.30
0284033
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
2000-06-08
4,645.03
0284034
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
2000-06-08
11.61
0284035
KROMHOUT, RONALD
2000-06-08
500.00
0284036
KANE'S APPLIANCE SERVICE
2000-06-08
36.95
0284037
KELLY TRACTOR CO
2000-06-08
56.13
0284038
KERBY, STEVE
2000-06-08
5.34
0284039
KILPATRICK TURF EQUIPMENT INC
2000-06-08
5,892.00
0284040
KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT
2000-06-08
225.15
0284041
KAVANAUGH, PHIL
2000-06-08
150.00
0284042
KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
2000-06-08
1,582.74
0284043
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
2000-06-08
223.53
0284044
KEHOE, TOM
2000-06-08
190.00
0284045
KNIGHT, ROGER & KAREN
2000-06-08
8.04
0284046
L I TREE SERVICE, INC
2000-06-08
1,540.00
0284047
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
2000-06-08
1,798.67
0284048
LEWIS, RUTH A
2000-06-08
35.06
0284049
L B SMITH, INC
2000-06-08
66.02
0284050
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
2000-06-08
323.08
0284051
LOPRESTI, ETTA
2000-06-08
158.72
0284052
LESCO, INC
2000-06-08
134.95
0284053
LAPSCO INC
2000-06-08
117.50
0284054
LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC
2000-06-08
200.19
0284055
LEKANIDIS, GEORGE
2000-06-08
5,000.00
0284056
LARGE PRINT LIBRARY DISCOUNTER
2000-06-08
60.67
0284057
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
2000-06-08
31.80
0284058
LEBEAU, GERALD
2000-06-08
19.50
0284059
LOWTHER CREMATION SERVICES INC
2000-06-08
300.00
0284060
LYNDEL & COMPANY
2000-06-08
225.00
0284061
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
2000-06-08
119.43
June 20, 2000
12
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
SCK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0284062
MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
2000-06-08
151.26
0284063
MIKES GARAGE
2000-06-08
565.00
0284064
MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
2000-06-08
8,260.00
0284065
MASHED POTATO PLAYERS
2000-06-08
225.00
0284066
MDS MATRX
2000-06-08
334.56
0284067
MICRO WAREHOUSE
2000-06-08
4,553.05
0284068
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
2000-06-08
83.11
0284069
MORNINGSTAR, INC
2000-06-08
1,114.70
0284070
MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
2000-06-08
776.25
0284071
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
2000-06-08
657.60
0284072
MTW ROOFING COMPANY
2000-06-08
5,139.00
0284073
MARC INDUSTRIES
2000-06-08
123.36
0284074
MICKLE, VALERIE
2000-06-08
123.42
0284075
MELCHIORI, NICK
2000-06-08
51.50
0284076
MELBOURNE COMMERCIAL KITCHEN
2000-06-08
306.81
0284077
MARTIN, CRISTI
2000-06-08
504.00
0284078
MCINTYRE, ELWELL & STRAMMER
2000-06-08
3,180.66
0284079
MORICO, TINA
2000-06-08
278.10
0284080
MORAVEC, JOSEPH J & LORETTA A
2000-06-08
32.26
0284081
MEREDITH BOOKS
2000-06-08
5.98
0284082
MID -FLORIDA FORKLIFT, INC
2000-06-08
634.02
0284083
MILLBROOK PRESS, INC
2000-06-08
9,71
0284084
NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING
2000-06-08
608.92
0284085
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
2000-06-08
120.13
0284086
NICOSIA, ROGER J DO
2000-06-08
4,440.00
0284087
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
2000-06-08
601.70
0284088
NAPIER, WILLIAM M
2000-06-08
20.59
0284089
NEOPOST
2000-06-08
1,293.00
0284090
NEOPOST
2000-06-08
75.00
0284091
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
2000-06-08
720.89
0284092
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
2000-06-08
3,494.04
0284093
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
2000-06-08
90.67
0284094
PARKS RENTAL INC
2000-06-08
238.50
0284095
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
2000-06-08
56.55
0284096
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
2000-06-08
151.92
0284097
PETTY CASE
2000-06-08
199.85
0284098
PETTY CASH
2000-06-08
178.90
0284099
POST, LORRAINE M
2000-06-08
513.88
0284100
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
2000-06-08
384.82
0284101
PAGE, LIVINGSTON
2000-06-08
180.00
0284102
PRECISION CONTRACTING
2000-06-08
185.75
0284103
PAGENET OF FLORIDA
2000-06-08
239.75
0284104
PROTEC COOLING TOWERS, INC
2000-06-08
607.00
0284105
PAUL CONWAY SHIELDS
2000-06-08
527.00
0284106
PROMEDIX.COM
2000-06-08
37.00
0284107
PROFESSIONAL OUTFITTERS, INC
2000-06-08
159.95
0284108
PAYNE, JAMES
2000-06-08
20.00
0284109
PHOTIKON
2000-06-08
380.00
0284110
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
2000-06-08
139.07
0284111
QUINTERO, ANGELA T
2000-06-08
31.03
0284112
RADIOSHACK
2000-06-08
415.86
0284113
RINGHAVER
2000-06-08
800.00
0284114
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
2000-06-08
737,27
0284115
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
2000-06-08
22,492.47
0284116
RIORDAN, MICHAEL C PSY.D.
2000-06-08
5,025.00
0284117
RECORDED BOOKS INC
2000-06-08
224.80
0284118
R & G SOD FARMS
2000-06-08
170.00
0284119
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
2000-06-08
9.60
June 20, 2000
13
i
BOOK � e,G rAGE 79
CHECK NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0284120
REBEL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC
2000-06-08
1,089.75
0284121
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
2000-06-08
1,175.95
0284122
RASMUSSEN, ASHLEIGH
2000-06-08
177.68
0284123
ROMANO, CHRISTINA
2000-06-08
16.74
0284124
REYNOLDS, THERESA
2000-06-08
1,132.60
0284125
RESKOW, BRIAN
2000-06-08
200.00
0284126
RODRIGUEZ, JOSE & FLORITA
2000-06-08
5.52
0284127
RUSSO, JOSEPH ANTHONY
2000-06-08
285.00
0284128
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
2000-06-08
200.75
0284129
SCOTTY'S, INC
2000-06-08
6.08
0284130
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
2000-06-08
105.07
0284131
SMART CORPORATION
2000-06-08
261.20
0284132
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
2000-06-08
11,977.80
0284133
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
2000-06-08
256.90
0284134
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
2000-06-08
381.59
0284135
ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
2000-06-08
49.95
0284136
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
2000-06-08
261.55
0284137
SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
2000-06-08
376.36
0284138
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
2000-06-08
195.00
0284139
STRUNK FUNERAL HOME
2000-06-08
300.00
0284140
SUBWAY STAMP SHOP INC
2000-06-08
66.88
0284141
SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
2000-06-08
21.50
0284142
SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
2000-06-08
5,678.50
0284143
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
2000-06-08
196.60
0284144
SEXTON, HILDY
2000-06-08
80.00
0284145
SPALDING
2000-06-08
419.67
0284146
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
2000-06-08
596.18
0284147
SELIG CHEMICAL IND
2000-06-08
150.50
0284148
SAFECO, INC
2000-06-08
484.99
0284149
SEELEY, HAROLD R JR
2000-06-08
17.00
0284150
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
2000-06-08
457.57
0284151
SADLEK, STEPHEN
2000-06-08
500.00
0284152
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
2000-06-08
2,734.35
0284153
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
2000-06-08
7,091.71
0284154
SNOBERGER, RUTH ANN
2000-06-08
81.00
0284155
STEVENS PRINTING
2000-06-08
1,485.00
0284156
SIMS, MATTHEW
2000-06-08
124.70
0284157
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
2000-06-08
188.51
0284158
STANBRIDGE, RUTH
2000-06-08
132.48
0284159
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2000-06-08
3,632.34
0284160
STAGE & SCREEN
2000-06-08
23.60
0284161
SPX CORP
2000-06-08
395.00
0284162
DEP-STORAGE TANK REISTRATION
2000-06-08
125.00
0284163
SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC
2000-06-08
133,923.82
0284164
SCULLY, RICHARD B
2000-06-08
500.00
0284165
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-06-08
50.00
0284166
SIMPSON, MEGAN
2000-06-08
72.10
0284167
SOUTHERN COURT REPORTERS INC
2000-06-08
262.35
0284168
SUMMIT MOTOR PRODUCTS
2000-06-08
145.33
0284169
SAFETY CHEM INC
2000-06-08
374.22
0284170
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT TRUST
2000-06-08
2,660.00
0284171
SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA
2000-06-08
2,808.00
0284172
STORYTELLING WITH WINDELL
2000-06-08
175.17
0284173
SOFTCHOICE CORP
2000-06-08
530.00
0284174
SUNGARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
2000-06-08
3,000.00
0284175
SHELL FLEET CARD
2000-06-08
1,666.96
0284176
SAVE THE MOMENT
2000-06-08
41.00
0284177
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
2000-06-08
19.32
June 20, 2000
14
EOOK i rAGE
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0284178
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-06-08
8,308.47
0284179
THOMAS, DEBBY L
2000-06-08
164.50
0284180
TITLEIST DRAWER
2000-06-08
854.28
0284181
TRIBUNE, THE
2000-06-08
218.40
0284182
TRANE PARTS CENTER OF SOUTH
2000-06-08
139.72
0284183
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP, INC
2000-06-08
254.00
0284184
TRI -COUNTY CONCRETE PRODUCTS
2000-06-08
2,220.00
0284185
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
2000-06-08
20.00
0284186
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOOK CLUB
2000-06-08
23.94
0284187
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
2000-06-08
74.25
0284188
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
2000-06-08
215.25
0284189
THYSSEN MIAMI ELEVATOR
2000-06-08
1,958.00
0284190
TURK, JAMAL MD
2000-06-08
35.00
0284191
TRS REPROGRAHICS & SUPPLY
2000-06-08
86.10
0284192
TED ANDERSEN MASONRY
2000-06-08
600.00
0284193
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
2000-06-08
33,895.22
0284194
VELDE FORD, INC
2000-06-08
1,565.16
0284195
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-06-08
9,043.59
0284196
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
2000-06-08
3,108.79
0284197
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
2000-06-08
71.00
0284198
VERO MARINE CENTER, INC
2000-06-08
54.25
0284199
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-06-08
25.00
0284200
VERO BEARING & BOLT
2000-06-08
91.16
0284201
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
2000-06-08
50.00
0284202
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
2000-06-08
17.77
0284203
VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO
2000-06-08
893.33
0284204
VERO COLLISION CENTER
2000-06-08
100.00
0284205
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000-06-08
509.29
0284206
WALSH, LYNN
2000-06-08
48.72
0284207
WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
2000-06-08
27.20
0284208
W W GRAINGER, INC
2000-06-08
717.16
0284209
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000-06-08
19.88
0284210
WINN DIXIE STORES INC
2000-06-08
471.38
0284211
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
2000-06-08
150.58
0284212
WILLHOFF, PATSY
2000-06-08
130.00
0284213
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
2000-06-08
207.90
0284214
WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC
2000-06-08
200.60
0284215
WILSON, MARGARET F
2000-06-08
206.78
0284216
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
2000-06-08
4,639.20
0284217
WOLFE, ERIN
2000-06-08
16.74
0284218
WILSON, SUSAN BARNES
2000-06-08
244.63
0284219
WILSON, STEVEN
2000-06-08
110.73
0284220
XEROX CORPORATION
2000-06-08
2,740.66
0284221
YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC
2000-06-08
190.35
0284222
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
2000-06-08
26.06
0284223
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
2000-06-08
73.60
0284224
ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING
2000-06-08
29.75
0284225
MILLER, JOSEPH
2000-06-08
601.92
0284226
BAILEY, DAVID
2000-06-08
108.20
0284227
MERCURI, DEBRA
2000-06-08
486.14
0284228
BAKER, RON D.
2000-06-08
313.20
0284229
DAVIS, BRIAN
2000-06-08
3.56
0284230
GARNER, SYLVIA BERRY
2000-06-08
13.26
0284231
GILPIN, EASTON
2000-06-08
34.80
0284232
WEST, WILLIE E
2000-06-08
60.58
0284233
CAL BUILDERS INC
2000-06-08
48.63
0284234
ECKERDS DRUGS $2762
2000-06-08
128.84
June 20, 2000
15
U
BOOK I.Ij r'AGE 1 ` #21
BOOK r'AuE 7 0
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0284235
GRAND HARBOR
2000-06-08
66.32
0284236
GROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
2000-06-08
46.84
0284237
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
2000-06-08
71.76
0284238
ATKINS, C CLYDE
2000-06-08
30.96
0284239
STEADMAN, VIRGIL
2000-06-08
50.78
0284240
BERGER, HARRIS
2000-06-08
64.13
0284241
STEWART, DAVID
2000-06-08
74.09
0284242
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2000-06-08
49.06
0284243
CENTURY 21 SEA TREK
2000-06-08
41.18
0284244
COUNTRYSIDE N MOBILE HOME PARK
2000-06-08
35.52
0284245
RIVERSIDE THEATRE
2000-06-08
77.52
0284246
DWYER, TAMMY
2000-06-08
56.30
0284247
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
2000-06-08
39.20
0284248
BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA INC
2000-06-08
62.07
0284249
RCL DEVELOPMENT, INC
2000-06-08
10.63
0284250
FRIERSON, WALKER H
2000-06-08
36.77
0284251
HICKS, RODNEY C
2000-06-08
50.00
0284252
PARKER, DAVID G
2000-06-08
60.85
0284253
ORTON, A A
2000-06-08
249.92
0284254
AMERITREND HOMES
2000-06-08
203.38
0284255
HALL, IVA NANCY
2000-06-08
60.97
0284256
SMITH, SCOTT F
2000-06-08
29.13
0284257
POORE, DANIEL W
2000-06-08
52.49
0284258
VAIL, CYNTHIA H
2000-06-08
49.30
0284259
KILBOURNE, TIMOTHY E
2000-06-08
73.69
0284260
BARKER, GLORIA JEAN
2000-06-08
27.07
0284261
BANNON, ROBERT
2000-06-08
2.94
0284262
MILLER, BETTE
2000-06-08
60.55
0284263
SHREVE, BECKY
2000-06-08
36.44
0284264
CHANNING CORP XXIX
2000-06-08
63.58
0284265
SANDERSON, FREDA & MARK
2000-06-08
59.63
0284266
SHELLEY, ADELHEID
2000-06-08
17.37
0284267
MC CLOUD, COURTNEY
2000-06-08
4.22
0284268
THURSTON, JULIA
2000-06-08
37.50
0284269
JENSEN, JOHN STEN
2000-06-08
35.37
0284270
BAKER, JESS
2000-06-08
55.14
0284271
BONAIUTO, KATHLEEN
2000-06-08
190.65
0284272
BANNER, BRANDY ANNE
2000-06-08
11.85
0284273
HALSEY, E K
2000-06-08
44.24
0284274
P W HEARN INC
2000-06-08
327.30
0284275
BERMUDA CLUB ASSOCIATION
2000-06-08
1,000.38
0284276
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
2000-06-08
276.46
0284277
R ZORC & SONS
2000-06-08
68.92
0284278
BARTH CONSTRUCTION CO
2000-06-08
130.68
0284279
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO
2000-06-08
63.56
0284280
LURIA IMPROVEMENTS
2000-06-08
26.41
0284281
CONSTANCE CODIO
2000-06-08
4.49
0284282
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
2000-06-08
46.68
0284283
BROWN, RICHARD L
2000-06-08
92.15
0284284
OLSEN, THOMAS
2000-06-08
31.78
0284285
CARRINO, JOSEPH
2000-06-08
117.54
0284286
L & S MANAGEMENT
2000-06-08
51.69
0284287
KOPA IMPORTS INC
2000-06-08
21.72
0284288
FARACE, JULIA
2000-06-08
21.72
0284289
BRALEY, RONALD
2000-06-08
44.56
0284290
QUINTERO, ANGELA
2000-06-08
10.50
June 20, 2000
16
1,170,938.33
LJ
Rgquest by Commissi
7.C. oner Stanbridge to Attend Historic
Preservation and Historical Museums Special Category Grants
Meeting - Tallahassee - September 19-21,2000
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved
out -of -county travel for Commissioner Stanbridge to attend the
Historic .Preservation and Historical Museums Special Category
Grants meeting in Tallahassee September 19-21, 2000, as
requested.
7.D. Bid Award #2036 - Re Bid ofAnnual Bulk Undried Solar Salt
Contract Due to Notification of Price Increase by Current Vendor
(Morton Salt Co.,�
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13, 2000:
DATE. June 13, 2000
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director,,,iku,.Auj.
FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager
g#t
SUBJECT Award Bid 02036, Re -bid of Annual Bulk Undried Solar Salt contract due to
notification of price increase by vendor.
Utilities/Waste Water Treatment Plants
BACKGROUND:
This re -bid of the Annual Bulk Undried Salt Contract was initiated due to notification by our
current vendor, Morton Salt Co., that they would be unable to hold the current price of $46.00 per
June 20, 2000
17
BOCK . . rAGE i'_'b
BOCK JL!� MGE i""
ton. Increased costs in energy, packaging, labor and other costs to maintain and operate their
facilities were the reason given for the price increase.
This award is for a semi-annual bid and establishes firm pricing for a six (6) month period
beginning June 15, 2000 and ending December 30, 2000.
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
Specifications Mailed to:
Replies:
BID TABULATION:
June 2, 2000 at 2:00 P.M.
May 19 & 26, 2000
Two (2) Vendors
Two (2) Vendors
Vendor Unit Price Quantity Bid Amount
Morton Salt Co. $41.50 per ton 220 tons $ 9,130.00
Chicago, Illinois
Cargill Salt Inc. $49.00 per ton 220 tons $10,780.00
Tampa, Fl
ESTIMATED BUDGET. $19,044.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Utilities/Chemicals
471-218-536-035-23
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Morton Salt Company., Chicago. 111., as the lowest
most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
Chairman Adams wanted clarification on the price reduction and reason for the need
to rebid, and Administrator Chandler assured her that staff had contacted the low bidder
(Morton Salt Co) to reconfirm their new price of $41.50 per ton which was lower than their
old price of $46.00 per ton, which they said they could not hold firm.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#2036 to Morton Salt Company, as recommended in the
memorandum.
June 20, 2000
18
_I
•
7.E. Equipment Declared Surplus for Sale or Disposal
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 8,,2000:
DATE: June 8, 2000
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
T'HRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director -i c«"4
FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manager •j.,C�--
SUBJECT Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal _
BACKGROUND:
The attached list of equipment has been declared excess to the needs of the County and should
be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of Florida State Statutes. The attached list has
been posted in Microsoft Outlook Inbox under "All Public Folders" on the County network.
A joint auction with the City of Vero Beach, City of Sebastian, the School District and the
Sheriff is scheduled for July 15, 2000 at the City of Vero Beach Warehouse facility. The money
received from the sale will be appropriately deposited within the appropriate accounts.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare the list of excess property as
surplus and authorize its sale and/or proper disposal.
ON MOTIONby Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously declared the
list of excess property as surplus and authorized its sale and/or
proper disposal, as recommended in the memorandum.
June 20, 2000
19
•
�
BOOK r'AG71-idE
BOOK lij r'A'6E 'PJ-`
June 20, 2000 Surplus List of Equipment Purchasing Division
Det
Asset #
Fleet #
Description
Condition
Golf
14920
I
1993 EZ Go GXT 1500 3 Wheel
yes - no parking brake
Court/ISD
10565
Audio Amplifier
unknown/not used
Human Sery
9420
Computer Monitor & Keyboard
does not work
Attorney
16455
computer Monitor 17"
does not work
Emerg.Ser
16521
I
Computer System, P133
functional
Building
0
Computer. 386/16 w ke b & monitor
obsolete- inoperable
Emerg.Ser
0
Computer, 386/40
obsolete - junk
Attorney
16452
computer, monorail, desk top
works
Budget
15407
computer, notebook, Austin 486DX4
battery pack does not work
Court/JuryRm 18114
Copier, Canon NP 1215
drum is bad
Animal
9883
copier, savin 7350
toner leaks on to copies
Finance
13530
copier. savin 9210
does not work
Health
12246
Credenza, walnut
es/at airport store a/unitB66
Bldg & G
7657
Dehumidifier, Dayton
does not work
Utilities
12362
desk, full size, 6 drawergood/at
So.Co. RO Plant
Health
10334
desk, full size. 6 drawer
yesiat airport store a/unitB66
911 Com/Cntr 12597
Dictaphone Call Check
does not work
911 Com/Cntr 12596
Dictaphone Call Check
does not work
Public Works 0
Drafting Table
good
Fleet
4800
240
Dra line, Little Giant
Inoperable
Purchasing
14652
Forklift, 1993 Nissan w/ accessories
does not work
SWDD
14955
440
Forklift, 1993 Nissan w/ accessories
works
Road & B
10650
Grader, 1989 John Deere
high rea it cost, high # hours
Health
10332
Hernotology System
outdated
Elections
15042
HP Scan Jet 11
outdated
Tax Coll
10106
Modem (used w/ rimes stem)
good
Road & B
12402
Mower, 1990 E -Z Roll, model Pro 25 not in working order
Road & B
12403
Mower, 1990 E -Z Roll, model Pro 26 not in working order
Golf
16161
Multi -Pro 1100 Spray Rig ATV
yes - functional
Budget
80-9
Paper Cutter
good
General Ser
10246
PC Voice Mail Machine
outdated
Utilities
2277
Pitney Bowes Table Top Burster
operational
Tax Coll
9990
Prime 4587 tape controller
good
Tax Coll
13750
Prime PT250 Console CRT
good
Tax Coll
12220
jPrinter, Genicom LW 1255
good
Elections
4719
Printer, IBM 120CPS (1983)
operational
Building
12288
Printer, IBM 4019 Laser
yes
Building
12167
Printer, IBM 4019 Laser
yes
Clerk
13519
Printer, IBM Dot Band
does not work
Attorney
12962
Printer, IBM laser
works
Tax Coll
7140
Printer, URC Band
good
Road & B
7028
258
Pulvimixer, 1984 Rexworks
poor engine, needs overhaul
Golf
16657
Ransomes Greensplex 160
yes - functional
Golf
16658
Ransomes Greensplex 160
yes - functional
Golf
16238
Reelmaster 6500 D 38HP Tractor
weak left rear motor, runs
Health
10333
Reflatron/Medical Lab Test Equip.
outdated
Utilities
16017
Rerierated Auto Sampler
not in workinq order
Appraiser
0
ITable, round. 4ft
functional
Tax Coll
110107.2
ITellabs Communications Board
good
Tax Coll
110107.2
ITellabs Communications Board
good 77==d
June 20, 2000
20
•
June 20, 2000 Surplus List of Equipment Purchasing Division
Golf
13731
Terra Topper Top Dresser Unit
functionaUw-newspinner motor
SWDD
14144
403
Trailer, 1992 Sludge
Old & Deteriorating
SWDD
14148
404
Trailer, 1992 Sludge
Old & Deteriorating
Road & B
11690
109
Truck, 1990 Ford Dump
high repair cost, high mileage
Road & B
11689
108
Truck. 1990 Ford Dump
high repair cost, high mileage
SWDD
11103
061A
Truck. 1990 Freightliner Dump
Replace with new truck, works
SWDD
14017
444
Truck, 1992 Ford F250 Pickup
Old & Deteriorating
Golf
15845
Utility Vehicle, Carry All II turf
working condition
Golf
9130
Utility Vehicle, Carry All II turf
bums oil but runs
Health
13744
Typewriter Brother EM605
functional, but needs repair
Health
10367
Lab Equipment, Coulter counter
outdated
Health
13401
Hemo lobinometer - BMS
not in working order
Health
2184
Hemoglobinometer - BMS
not in working order
Health
13404
Hemoglobinometer - BMS
not in working order
Health
13403
Hemoglobinometer - BMS
not in working order
Health
4739
Typewriter IBM Selectric III
not in working order
Health
8753
Television (portable)
not in working order
Health
7756
Audiometer (portable)
not in working order
Emerg.Ser
11594
Telephone - TDD
yes - functional
Emerg.Ser
11595
Telephone - TDD
yes - functional
Emerg.Ser
0
Telephone - TDD
yes - functional
Heafth
0
1
ITypewriter Brother EM605
not in working order
Health
0
1
ITypewriter Brother EM605
not In working order
Bld & G
0
IUPS
s stem, motor generator 50kw
not in working order, parts only
7.F. Contract for r Dgputy County Attorney William G. Collins H
(First Annual,
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney Cyeo
DATE: June 13, 2000
RE: CONTRACT— DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
This spring the Board of County Commissioners amended the County Code with
reference to the County Attorney's Office. The revision makes all future attorneys
contract employees. This means any attorney can be terminated without cause.
No rights to employment could be asserted by the attorneys under the U.S.
Constitution on federal civil rights laws.
The BCC at Its regular meeting of June 13, 2000 approved the contract for the new
County Attorney, Mr. Bangel. Deputy County Attorney Collins has agreed to waive
June 20, 2000
21
BOOK 21J rAGE LID
s3
BOCK 1tJ CAGET,
his federal and constitutional rights to continued employment and become a
contract employee. The contract for his employment is the same as the BCC
approved last week for Mr. Bangel except for the following:
• Lesser compensation (Mr. Collins'
current salary)
• No moving expenses
• No American Bar Association Dues
• No sick leave credit above current accruals
• No car allowance
Recommendation: Consent to making the Deputy County Attorney a contract
employee pursuant to the terms of the attached contract and Indian River County
Code Section 101.06.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously consented to
making the Deputy County Attorney (William G. Collins II) a
contract employee pursuant to the terms of the contract and
Indian River County Code Section 101.06, as recommended in
the memorandum.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN TBE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.G. Contract for Executive Aide to the Board Kimberly E. Massung
First Annual
The;Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13, 2000:
TO: Boa ACounty Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney
DATE: June 13, 2000
RE: CONTRACT — EXECUTIVE AIDE TO THE COMMISSION
June 20, 2000
0*
•
Pursuant to section 101.03 of the Indian River County Code, the Executive Aide
along with the County Attorney and County Administrator serve at the pleasure of
the Board of County Commissioners. The Executive Aide is currently the only
person in the group serving without a written contract.
I have prepared a contract along the same lines as the new County Attorney and
Deputy County Attorney's contracts for the Executive Aide for your consideration.
This was coordinated with the Executive Aide.
Reavmmendatioir. Consent to making the Executive Aide to the
Commission a contract employee pursuant to the terms of the attached
contract and Indian River County Code Section 101.06.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously consented to
making the Executive Aide to the Board a contract employee
pursuant to the terms of the proposed contract and Indian River
County Code Section 101.06, as recommended in the
memorandum.
CONTRACT Is ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
Z.H. Resoludon Nos. 2000-067 and 2000-068 - Tax Cancelladon on
Recen Acguired Properties - Right of Way 5th Street SW
(-ohnston Harkins and Right of Way 57th Avenue (Buckner)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 7, 2000:
June 20, 2000
23
BOCK Ir'AGE 7 L
II
BOCK I rA"E l�e�
TO: Board of Commissioners
FROM: Le f���
Keller, CLA
Legal Assistant - County Attorney's Office
DATE: June 7, 2000
RE: Recently Acquired Property - Tax Cancellation
The County recently acquired some property and, pursuant to Section 196.28,
Florida Statutes, the Board may cancel and discharge any taxes owed on it as
long as it was acquired for public purpose. Such cancellation must be done
by resolution of the Board, with a certified copy being forwarded to the Tax
Collector (along with copies sent to the Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Reauested Action: Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached
resolutions which cancel taxes upon the land that the County recently
acquired.
Attachment Resolution & Leaal:
RNV — 5" Street SW — Johnston -Harkins
RNV — 5r Avenue - Buckner
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2000-067 cancelling certain delinquent taxes
upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes. (R/W 5' Street SW - Bernita Johnston Harkins)
June 20, 2000
24
•
Re: RNV - 5TH Street SW
Bemita Johnston Harkins
Tax ID 21-33-39-1-70-3.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 067
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
7. The property is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1333, Page 2490 which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 196.28, F.S.
8. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certit7ed copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 20th day of
lump , 2000.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A. Barton, Cie
Deputy Clerk
TAX CERTIFICATES OUTSTANM-11i 7.t -
CURRENT PROR 7 TE.:: R'-- 77.7 '
DEPOSITED WITH TAX COLLrL-r--r;
June 20, 2000
25
By ZIF2Xe�
XIRr*%AX914") Caroline D. Ginn
NOIOIOXAN Vice Chairman
mo Rm to Approved Dale
Admin
i /•" ( S . j„
Legal
Bunoet
p -g-aa
Dept.
Risk Mgr.
I
BOCK rAGE 1
•
4 -0
U
0
Ca
qu
,C
J
0
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The North 60 feet of the South 90 feet in
of the West 10 acres of the East 20 55 00
13 2.49 1
1327.5'
N SOUTH RELIEF CANAL N
327.35' 327.35'
Scale: N. T. S.
acres of Tract 7, Section 21, Township 33 M
m
in
C
M
I
J
East
West
o
M
10 Ac.
10 Ac.
East ~
_ of
of
East
West
10.55 Ac.
_
20 Ac.
20.55 Ac.
River Forms Company recorded in Plat Book
Scale: N. T. S.
acres of Tract 7, Section 21, Township 33 M
in
M
I
South, Range 39 East, according to the M
M
I
lost general plot of the lands of the Indian
_
1"
River Forms Company recorded in Plat Book
Ix
2, Page 25 of the Public Records of St.Lucie
County, Floride,
>
Contcininy 19.644 square feet, or 0.451
I
>
rte
32 7.45'
327.45'
327.4
345.4'
o
County, Fl:)ri:i::
-- ----
-
- _�
o
O C
ice'• ----�
u,
1D 3_27._45
327.45''
/
l0 345.4' to
1
to
_I
5TH
; STREET I
S. W. M;
--
—
_
-- ----
-
1327.7'
Tract Line
- —
a
CERTIFlCATION
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered
Professional
Surveyor and Mapper licensed to
practice in
0
the state of Florida, that this sketch was made under my
immediate supervision,
and that it is accurate
and correct.
o
1 further certify that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical
standards
as described in Chapter 61G17
of the Florida
3
Administrative Code, pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
to
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094 Date
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
3
Indian River County Surveyor
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
IR40 25th street, Vero Beach, Ft. 32960
c�
�O
N
0
•
n
`j
to
W U
a1[ � J
ITg a
�v
0 c
LU
LULU
Q S
v ¢�
ao
LU Lrjo
0
�
o
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2000-068 cancelling certain delinquent taxes
upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida
Statutes. (R/W 571h Avenue - Jack & Christine Buckner)
Re: R/W — 57TM Avenue
Jack& Christine Buckner
Tax ID 21-32-39.1-130-2.0 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 068
June 20, 2000
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELLING CERTAIN DELINQUENT TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28,
FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
8. The property is hereby accepted and any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current,
against the property described in OR Book 1335, Page 1998 which was recently acquired by
Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled, pursuant to the authority of
Section 196.28, F.S.
9. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge the vote was as follows: and, upon being put to a vote,
Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 20th day of
June ,2000.
on, Clerk
Deputy Clerk
27
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A
By �ZMX-
ine D. Ginn
INxo( Vice Chairman
30 D 5 if. 60
( IN FEET
1 inch -- 30 ft
LEGAL
aAL
the North 102 feet of the South
52 feet of the Fast 35 feet of the
West 10 acres of Tract 13, Section 21,
lo*nship 32 South, Range 39 Fast,
u,cording to the lost general plot of
the lands of the Indian River Forms
r:nmpany recorded in Plot Book 2,
Page 25 of the Public Records of
;t Lucie County, Florida.
Containing 3,570 square feet.
Now
lying in Indian River County,
nor do
263 38'
i
OR 1335PG 1999
I I
45TH STREET o
35'
in
v
0
a
00
N
•
r 1
ULJ
o
�- Section
Line & Troct Line
in
CERTIFICATION
i. Charles A Cromer,
hereby coil
ly that I am a registered
Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in
in
the slate of f Ior,do,
that this car tr h was made under my
immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct.
I further cert fy that
this skelc.t,
—eels the Minimum Technical
standards as described in Chapter 611317 of the Florida
i;:
Administrative Coate,
p,rrsunnl I••
Chapter 472.
t7
Charles A Cromer,
P ` M He,)
14(j'1.1 0014
THIS Is NOT A SURVEY
':on River County
Surveyor
SKETCH TO AOCOWPANY'LEGAL DESCRIPTION
?5th Street, Vero Beach,
;2961)
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EAIQINEEA" DEPARTUEt$T
00
N
•
r 1
d
7-L Beazer Homes - Addendum to Contract for Construction of
Required Improvements (Island Club Riverside -FPLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 12, 2000:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: WC William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney
DATE: June 12, 2000
SUBJECT: Amendment to Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements between County and Beazer Homes
Representatives of the Island Club Riverside Project have notified us that Florida
Power & Light is experiencing delays in providing power to a lift station. These
unforeseen delays will preclude Beazer Homes Corp. from completing required
utility improvements by the contract deadline of July 1 st.
The Indian River County Code allows developers one year from plat approval to
complete required subdivision improvements. The contract between Beazer
Homes Corp. and the County had a completion date of July 1st, which they are
now requesting be extended to March 1, 2001. (This is not the contract that
deals with Jungle Trail revegetation for Live Oaks.)
Recommendation: Authorize the Chairman to sign the contract addendum
extending the completion date 10 March 1, 2001.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to sign the contract addendum extending the
completion date to March 1, 2001, as recommended in the
memorandum.
June 20, 2000
COPY OF ADDENDUM IS ON FILE
IN TBE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
29
BOOK . tXE
7.J. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 8, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners %)
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney�C/
DATE: June 8. 2000
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney
has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the weeks of May 22 through June 5, 2000. Listed below are the vendors and the amount of
each court -related cost.
Vendor:
Payment for:
Amount:
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
73.50
Sandy Crawford, Clerk
State Attorney Costs
14.00
Smart Corporation
State Attorney Costs
14.73
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
108.50
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
27,24
Mark Wallach
Public Defender Costs
11.50
Brian Mallone
Public Defender Costs
4.01
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
87.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
108.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
42.00
Sheila I. Flinnn
Transcription
210.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
28.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
56.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
84.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
73.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
21.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
52.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
129.50
Shiriey E. Corbin
Transcription
346.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
63.00
Jiffy Photo
State Attorney Costs
40.50
Cristi Martin
Transcription
49.00
Michael C. Riordan, Psy.D.
Clinical Evaluation
400.00
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
14.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts - Misd.
600.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts - Felony
5,400.00
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
397.50
Michael C. Rriordan, Psy. D.
Expert Witness
500.00
Interim Court Reporting
Transcription
81.00
Jamel Turk, M.D.
Public Defender Costs
35.00
Cristi Martin
Transcription
87.50
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
49.00
Crista Martin
Transcription
49.00
Cristi Martin
Transcription
91.00
Debby Thomas
Transcription
164.50
Crista Martin
Transcription
59.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
535.50
Cristi Martin
Transcription
217.00
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
91.00
Medical Record Services
Transcription
73.00
June 20, 2000
31
BOOK rAGE 9
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Transcription
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
Steve Kerby
State Attorney Costs
Michael C. Riordan, Psy. D.
Clinical Evaluation
Hammond & Smith, P.A.
Indigent Dependency Cases (14)
Pegasus Travel
Witness Coordination
Ryan Butler
Witness Coordination
Cristi Martin
Transcription
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
Unishippers
State Attorney Costs
Michael C. Riordan, Psy.D.
Clinical Evaluation
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
Gregory C. Landrum
Clinical Evaluation
American Reporting
Transcription
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
Total
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
E00K iIj SAGE d
500.00
126.00
10.11
5.34
4,525.00
12,700.00
483.00
200.00
122.50
14.11
10.04
900.00
38.50
31.50
94.50
625.00
46.00
6.33
168.00
87.50
$31,182.91
7.K. Arbor Trace Phase I Planned Development iffor�merly known as
Oak Tracej - Final Plat Approval
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D SI N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development D lector
14-6.
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Mark Zans -WZ
Staff Planner. Current Development
DATE: June 13, 2000
SUBJECT: Request for Final Plat Approval for Arbor Trace Phase I Planned Development
(fka. Oak Trace)
June 20, 2000
32
•
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 20, 2000.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The subject project was approved on August 12, 1999 by the Planning and Zoning Commission as
Arbor Trace Phase I PD. The total project is a two phase 71.92 acre single-family planned
development subdivision containing 148 lots. located on the west side of 43id Avenue between 5'
Street SW and Oslo Road. The subject site is zoned RS -3, Residential Single Family (up to 3 units
per acre), and is being developed at a density of 2.16 units per acre. Arbor Trace Phase I contains
87 lots, recreation tracts, road rights-of-way, stormwater tracts, and future development tracts. The
future development tracts will be platted in the future as Phase 2 single family lots. The proposed
Phase 1 final plat is in conformance with the approved conceptual plan and the approved preliminary
PD plan/plat.
At its regular meeting of September 7. 1999, the Board of County Commissioners granted planned
development special exception use approval for the overall project. The Board's action made
effective the two phase preliminary PD plat approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Subsequently, a land development permit was issued for construction of the improvements required
to serve the proposed planned development. Because construction of required improvements (i.e.
roadways, stormwater management, utilities) has not been completed at this time, the developer is
proposing to "bond -out" to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the remaining work to be
performed. The applicant, Oak Trace Development. through its agent Triad International
Consultants, is now requesting final plat approval for Arbor Trace and has submitted the following:
1. A final plat in conformance with the approved conceptual and preliminary PD plan/plat-,
=. A Contract for Construction of the remaining required subdivision improvements.
3. An Engineer's Certified Cost Estimate for completion of the remaining required subdivision
improvements;
ANALYSIS:
Not all of the required subdivision improvements have been completed as of this date (i.e.
landscaping buffers, roadways, stormwater management, and utility services). However, the
developer desires to proceed with recording the plat and proposes to "bond -out" for construction of
the remaining required on-site improvements pursuant to the provisions of subdivision ordinance
section 913.10. An itemized certified engineer's cost estimate for completion of the remaining
improvements has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, Utilities Services
Department, and the Community Development Department. The developer has submitted a contract
for construction of required improvements. The County Attorney's Office has approved the format
of the letter of credit. The original letter of credit will need to be submitted to the County Attorney's
Office prior to the County Attorney signing the mylar. The contract. which is on a standard form
approved by the County Attorney's Office, requires all improvements to be completed within one
year. With those documents, the developer has complied with the appropriate requirements to
obtain final plat approval.
Platting will allow lot sales and construction of single family homes. However, under the
subdivision ordinance. no certificates of occupancy will be issued until required improvements are
completed and deemed acceptable.
June 20, 2000
33
C
BOOK. rAGE �r
BOCK jj'j PAUGE72
RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
grant final plat approval for Arbor Trace Phase I, accept the submitted letter of credit, and authorize
the Chairman to execute the contract for construction.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Approved Planned Development Preliminary Plat/Plan
4. Phase I Final Plat
5. Ccrtttract for Co Ksmsction (copy)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously granted final
plat approval for Arbor Trace Phase I, accepted the submitted
letter of credit, and authorized the Chairman to execute the
contract for construction, as recommended in the memorandum.
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.L. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #015
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 141 2000:
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: June 14, 2000
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 015
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator,_,
FROM: Jason E. Brown !
Budget Manager',.
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
June 20, 2000
34
1. Indian River County Libraries have received donations totaling $5,422. The attached
entry appropriates the use of these donated funds.
2. On June 13, 2000, the Board of Commissioners approved utilizing $8,497 from the
Law Enforcement Trust Fund as a match for the Sheriffs 1999 Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant. The attached entry accounts for the match and the pass
through of the grant.
3. The State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program has received a larger
distribution from the State than was budgeted for FY 1999/2000. The attached entry
appropriates the use of these funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget
amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved
Budget Amendment #015, as recommended in the
memorandum.
TO: Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 015
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E. Brown C"�
DATE: June 20, 2000
Qndnnf Unmmnar
Entry
Fund/Deporinent/
Number
Account(Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Main Library
Donations - Books
001-000-366-103.00
$3,422
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Main Library
Donations
001-000-366-095.00
$1,417
$0
GENERAL FUND/ North County
Library Donations
001-000-366-097.00
$583
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/
Books
001-109-571-035.45
$2,000
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/
Audio -Visual
001-109-571-035.48
$950
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/
Children's Programming
001-109-571-038.19
$1,050
$0
GENERAL FUND/ North County
Library/ Books
001-112-571-035.45
$1,239
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Law Library/
Books
001-119-571-035.45
$183
$0
June 20, 2000
35
�
BOOK PAGE 19
BOOK LJ r'AGE
2.
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant
001-000-331-024.00
$76,471
$0
LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST
FUND/ Confiscated Property
112-000-351-020.00
$8,497
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Sheriff/ LLEBG
Transfer
001-600-586-099.26
$76,471
$0
LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST
FUND/ Sheriff Transfer
112-600-586-099.04
$8,497
$0
3.
REVENUES
SHIP PROGRAM/ Cash Forward
Revenues
123-000-389-040.00
$150,000
$0
EXPENSES
SHIP PROGRAM/ Down Payment -
Closing Costs Loan
123-228-569-088.05
$65,000
$0
SHIP PROGRAM/ Rehabilitation
Loans - Owner Occupied
123-228-569-088.07
$85,000
$0
7.M. Senior Management Service - Contract for Assistant
Countv Administrator
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 14, 2000:
T0: Board ei✓County Comrpis�i
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Acting County Attorney
DATE: June 14, 2000
RE: ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
SENIOR MANAGEMENT SERVICE
The Board at its regular meeting of June 13, 2000 approved for Senior Management
Service the County Attorney, Deputy County Attorney, Executive Aide to the
Commission, and the Assistant County Administrator.
To bring the Assistant County Administrator into Senior Management Service, I
have prepared the attached contract that you may want to use.
June 20, 2000
36
Recnmmendatlon: Consent to making the Assistant County Administrator
a contract employee pursuant to the terms of the attached contract
doll
Attachment: Contract
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously consented to
making the Assistant County Administrator a contract employee
pursuant to the terms of the proposed contract, as recommended
in the memorandum.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.N. Resolution No. 2000-069 - Urging the Governor to Stop the
Closing of G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital in Desoto Count
The Commissioners reviewed the proposed resolution.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2000-069 urging the Governor to stop the
closing of G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital in Desoto
County.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 069
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY URGING
THE GOVERNOR TO STOP THE CLOSING OF G. PIERCE
WOOD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL IN DESOTO COUNTY
June 20, 2000
37
PAGE SOCK d �'G
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 069
WHEREAS, G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital has been a state facility in DeSoto County
since 1947; and
WHEREAS, G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital serves the mental health care needs of the
most severely impaired patients in eighteen counties in South Florida which include Charlotte, Collier,
DeSoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Hillsborough, Indian River, Lee, Manatee, Martin,
Okeechobee, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, St. Lucie and Sarasota; and °
WHEREAS, the Governor and the Department of Children and Families proposed a plan that
will close G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital; and
WHEREAS, the closing of G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital would create a monumental
mental health crisis in the eighteen counties; and
WHEREAS, when Charter Glade Hospital closes in about two weeks, the burden of
providing mental care in Southwest Florida will be severely compounded; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Children and Families did not request the additional funding
which is needed to overcome the cut in the disproportionate share of Medicare by the federal
government for mental health care needs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the County unanimously
supports the needs of the community and urges the Governor to stop the closing of G. Pierce Wood
Memorial Hospital in DeSoto County, investigate the trend across this nation that is moving mental
health away from community-based facilities and increase the funding of mental health care to permit
G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital to serve the needs of eighteen counties in South Florida.
The Resolution was moved by Commissioner Gi nn , and seconded by
Commissioner Stanbridge , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Ave
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Ave
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 20th day of
June, 2000.
Attest
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
r
Caroline D. Ginn, Vice C , 'rman
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
June 20, 2000
38
7.0. Children's Services Advisory Committee - Appointment of
Donna Maurer (renlacementfor Inez Fielding who had resigned"
The Board reviewed a letter from Donna Maurer.
Donna Maurer
IS60931dAven"
Nero Sena, 9&w i& 92964
(361) 794-1009
Fran Adams
Board of Coumy Commissioners
Vero Beach, Florida
Der Fran:
I would be honored to serve on the Children's Services Advisory Committee.
This appouitmal would bring my ministry W dre* as I began my career as Junior Church
supetmtendeat in a lige, metropohm church. The 200 children m that church. aged 3 to 12,
represented a &vauW of ethnicity and socio -ewe levels. They taught me much mora than I
could ever have taught tlum, sad today, years lata. I look back at that tie in my life with love
and affection.
As a thumbnail of my career, before becomM senior mer at Gcom Church of Religious
Science has in Vero Beadle I have also served as Assistant Dun to the Emest Holmes COW
std Sclmol ofhGdStry (Loa Angeles gmpus)� Aasitaant hfimsta ofFounder's Church of
Religious Science in Los Aogelea; at►a as Chaplain for Hosioe of the Canyon in MAx4
California.
I attended Antioch University in Loa Angelea, and I am a graduate of the Grantsmanship Center in
LOW Angcies. ALM while in Los Angeles, I waa an integral part of the production team for the
Easter Sunrise Service at the Hollywood Bowl for time years, and am a lifetime member of that
Wyou would hlte rnot+e information, or a formal resume, please let me bow. Thank you so much
for malting me to be a part of a nib a worthwbile and pert -speed committee.
Donna Flirschfidd Mauer, RSc.F.
June 20, 2000
39
SOCK .IU au -,E
BOOK i.) CAGE 7_
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously confirmed
Chairman Adams' appointment of Donna Maurer to the
Children's Services Advisory Committee, as recommended by
the Chairman.
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING- ORDINANCE NO. 2000-017 -REZONE
f5 ACRES AT 13575 83RD AVENUE FROM MED TO OCR AT
REQUEST OF DONALD WILLIAMSON
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMEDU FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
June 12, 2000, with the aid of a site map and a Power Point® presentation, a copy of which
has been placed in the backup for this meeting.
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
D�TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating, AIGP; Commun[ty Development Director
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, L04 -Range Planning S//��',,
FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: June 12, 2000
RE: Donald Williamson's Request to Rezone f5 Acres from MED to OCR
(RZON 2000-04-0043)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 20, 2000.
This is a request to rezone t5 acres from MED, Medical District, to OCR, Office/Commercial/
Residential District. As depicted in Figure 1, the subject property is located in the northeast part of
the county, north of Roseland Road and west of US 1. The site extends in a northwesterly direction
from 83'd Avenue (Bay Street) to the St. Sebastian River and contains a single-family residence.
June 20, 2000
40
There are two purposes of this request. The fust is to eliminate the non -conformity associated with
the existing use (Residences are allowed only as accessory uses within the MED zoning district.).
The other purpose of this request is to secure the necessary zoning to permit renovation and
expansion of the residence on the subject property.
On May 25, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from MED to OCR.
Figure 2: Location and Zoning of the Subject Property
Subject
Site
m
R
N
■ n rc W.
1
Yb7 itigT
GOV. LOT 4
s
MED
s
RS -3
���,
,�.. a-
1
GOV.
goy
GO
CG
RM -6
Existing Land Use Pattern
Zoned MED, Medical District, the subject property is heavily wooded and contains a single-family
residence and several accessory buildings. Land to the northeast contains pine flatwoods and is
zoned MED. Land to the southeast, across 83id Avenue (Bay Street), is zoned RS -3. Single -Family
Residential District (up to 3 unitstacre), and consists of vacant wooded land. To the southwest of
the subject property, abutting land is zoned RS -3 and contains single-family residences. The St.
Sebastian River abuts the site on the northwest.
June 20, 2000
41
8 0 0 K II r'�AGE , iL
BOCK tAUE
The subject property and properties to the northeast are designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on
the future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning
districts. Properties to southwest and southeast of the subject property are designated L-2, Low -
Density Residential -2, on the future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with
a density of up to 6 units/acre.
The developed portion of the site is relatively small. The majority of the site is covered with pine
flatwoods. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the northwest fringe of the site, along the
St. Sebastian River, is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation
requirement of 6 feet. The balance of the site is not in a flood hazard area.
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines from the North County Reverse
Osmosis Plant extend to the site. Wastewater lines from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plant also extend to the site.
Transportation System
The subject property abuts 83`d Avenue (Bay Street), a two lane local road with approximately 80
feet of public road right-of-way. This segment of 83`d Avenue (Bay Street) is not currently
programmed for expansion.
Zoning District Differences
As noted in the county's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), the MED zoning district is
intended to support, accommodate and protect a "major medical facility." Permitted uses within the
MED district include doctor's offices, health and medical related services and institutions. and
related retail.
The OCR zoning district is designed to protect residential uses in areas where commercial and
residential uses may mix. According to county regulations, the OCR zoning district is programmed
for office, commercial, and residential development that is compatible with nearby neighborhoods.
Permitted uses within the OCR zoning district include professional offices and residences. Most
retail, service, and other intense commercial uses are prohibited.
The difference between the MED and OCR zoning districts is best illustrated by the respective
purpose statements of the two districts. These purpose statements, found in the LDRs, are as
follows:
• MED, Medical District, is intended to provide a variety of uses which support a major
medical facility, and to protect such major medical facility from encroachment by land uses
which may have an adverse effect on the operation and potential expansion of the facility.
Land uses that could cause an adverse effect would generally include those uses that are
likely to be objectionable to neighboring properties because of noise, vibration, odors,
smoke, amount of traffic generated, or other physical manifestations.
OCR, Office, Commercial, Residential District, is intended to provide areas for the
development of restricted office, commercial, and residential activities in a manner which
will be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. The OCR district is further intended
June 20, 2000
42
9 is
•
to provide land use controls for ensuring the separation of potentially incompatible activities,
such as intense commercial uses, from established residential areas.
The MED and OCR districts are similar in several ways. Both districts are designed to
accommodate office use and limit retail uses. In terms of permitted uses, the major difference
between the districts is that OCR allows a wider variety of office uses, while the MED district
permits more retail uses:
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. Specifically,
this section will include the following:
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities and services;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate
provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the
community. The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that
the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning district. For commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.16 and the county's Land Development Regulations) is retail
commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for rezoning. The
site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±5 acres
2. Existing Zoning District: MED, Medical District
3. Proposed Zoning District: OCR, Office/Commercial/Residential District
4. Most Intense Use under Existing Zoning District:
±50,000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6`h Edition ITE Manual)
5. Most Intense Use under Proposed Zoning District:
±50,000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6`" Edition ITE Manual)
June 20, 2000
43
0
BOCK.. PAGE.
Fr- I
Boc-�. 11J rAGE T-32
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from
concurrency requirements. Tlds rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the
requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site.
By changing the zoning of the subject property from MED to OCR, residential uses not currently
allowed would be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of the property
would be the same with either zoning district, changing the property's zoning from MED to OCR
would not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities.
When new development is proposed for the subject property, a more detailed concurrency analysis
will be conducted during the development approval process.
Compatibility is not a major concern regarding this request. Located between existing MED and RS -
3 zoning districts, the subject property is well -situated to act as a transition area between commercial
and residential development.
The principal impacts of development of the subject property will be on the residential area abutting
the site on the southwest. Compared to the site's existing MED zoning, the proposed OCR zoning
district is less intense. In terms of noise, hours of operation, and traffic generated, the impacts of
OCR type development are less than the impacts of MED type development. Consequently,
development under the OCR district would generally have fewer impacts than development under
MED zoning. For that reason, the proposed OCR zoning of the site would be compatible with the
adjacent residential uses.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture. residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important pans of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request is the following policy.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the commercial land use designation is intended
for uses such as retail and wholesale trade, offices, business and personal services, residential
treatment centers, limited residential uses, and other similar type uses. In addition, that policy states
that all commercial uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area.
Since the subject property is located within a commercial/industrial node within the county's urban
service area, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15.
June 20, 2000
44
•
While the referenced policy is particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan
policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for
consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the
request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Environmental protection regulations are the same under both the existing MED and the requested
OCR zoning districts. Permits must be issued by county environmental planning staff prior to the
removal of any protected trees, and the county's 10/15% native upland plant community preservation
requirement applies. For those reasons, the proposed rezoning will not have significant adverse
impacts on important environmental resources.
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area. consistent with the goals, objectives,
and policies of the comprehensive plan, and meets all applicable concurrency criteria. The subject
property is located in an area deemed suitable for a mix of office, restricted commercial, and
residential uses. The request meets all applicable criteria. For these reasons, staff supports the
request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from MED to OCR.
1. Rezoning Application
2. Summary Page
3. Approved Minutes of the May 25, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4. Rezoning Ordinance
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance No. 2000-017 amending the Zoning Ordinance and
the accompanying zoning map for ±5 acres located at 13575 831
Avenue, from MED, Medical District, to OCR, Office
Commercial Residential District.
June 20, 2000
45
•
EOOK ]J,
BOOK IiJ f'Ai;E 41
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 017
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR f5 ACRES LOCATED AT
13575 83RD AVENUE, FROM MED, MEDICAL DISTRICT, TO OCR, OFFICE/COMMERCIAL/
RESIDENTIAL, DISTRICT; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
LOT 1, WAUREGAN SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT BY S.B. CARTER
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BREVARD COUNTY,
FLORIDA, REFILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AT PLAT BOOK 1, PAGES 178 AND 179, SAID LANDS
FRONTING ON BAY STREET AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE SEBASTIAN
BAY AND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Be changed from MED, Medical District, to OCR, Office/Commercial/Residential District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
June 20, 2000
0
46
•
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-017
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, on this 2e day of June, 2000.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 7`b day of June, 2000, for a public
hearing to be held on the 2e day of June, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Gi nn , seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dge, and adopted by the
following vote:
Chairman Fran B. Adams AyP
Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Ave
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: unL"L
Caroline D. Ginn-,' Ace Chai man
ATTEST ��I. 0 Lc ,
Jeffrey K. Barton, Cler
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
1
William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney m®an R" Ca Aocroaco oats
Admlrn
Legal
Budget✓ 6
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS RISK y_
Risk Mgr. I
ito6ert M. Keal"ing, A1CP'
Community Development
cd\u\v\j\rz\williamson\rion-ord.wpd
June 20, 2000
47
BOOKS
BOOK h FADE �
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PARADISE PARTNERS, INC.
REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO
REDESIGNATE ±0.63 ACRES FROM C/I TO L-1, AND REZONE
THOSE ±0.63 ACRES TO CG AND A-1 (SUBJECT PROPERTY 1:
APPROXIMATELY 249' SOUTH OF CR 512 AND APPROXIMATELY
235' EAST OF CR 510); AND TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±0.63 ACRES FROM L-1 TO C/I, AND TO
REZONE THOSE ±0.63 ACRES FROM A-1 TO CG (SUBJECT
PROPERTY 2: SOUTH SIDE OF CR 512, APPROXIMATELY 300'
EAST OF CR 5101
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
June 6, 2000 with the aid of a map of the area and a Power Point® presentation displayed
on the ELMO:
TO: James E. Chandler: County Administrator
DEPITMENT HEAD COONCVRRENCE
`Robert M. Keating, AICP;; Communi , Development Director
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Lon Range Plannings.'/'
FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning (�
DATE: June 6, 2000
RE: Paradise Partners, Inc., Request to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to
Redesignate :0.63 Acres From C/I to L-1, and to Rezone Those :0.63 Acres
From CG to A-1; and to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate:0.63
Acres From L-1 to C/I, and to Rezone Those:0.63 Acres from A-1 to CG
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 2000-040107
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 20, 2000.
June 20, 2000
48
I
•
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITTONS
This is a request to redesignate 10.63 acres from C/I, Commercial/Industrial, to L-1, Low -Density
Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre), while simultaneously redesignating a nearby 10.63 acre tract from
L -I to CIL Unlike node expansion requests, the proposed amendment will not increase the amount
of C/I designated land in the county. Rather, this amendment will reconfigure the CR 510/CR 512
C/I node.
The property to be redesignated from C/I to L-1 is the westernmost subject property depicted on
Figures 1 and 2. That property will be referred to as Subject Property 1. In addition to changing the
land use designation of Subject Property 1, the request also involves rezoning Subject Property 1
from CG, General Commercial District, to A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres).
Figure 1: Location and Land Use Designation of the Subject Properties
%a AC
it
smo _
L_1
aolreR � ,u -w
C.R. 512
Subject
,.e Property 2
C —
MJ
9 �
U ' Subject
Property 1
C/I p
P L-1
us
A / Q,
&M AC 000ma
ye3=aAc/
OCOMRZv
June 20, 2000
49
r
BOOK hi IAU6E
Figure 2: Zoning and Location of the Subject Properties
U"AC
A`-1 Sam— -A• �.
LEST RR IABA`I"
---- _ _ - - - A-1
7RDW'm SWLS
Jm.®e3 C.R. 512 ��m�� •�z
Subject
�. Property 2
:1YM
i r
Subject
Property 1
a � 0
® 6 A-1
P
CL
CL ' &M IACaomt.0 Q'
* s MM AC gZVE
��®�m�®gym■®ema � '•�
st A-1
RS -3 '
I
The property to be redesignated from L-1 to C/I is located just north and east of Subject Property 1.
That property will be referred to as Subject Property 2. In addition to changing the land use
designation of Subject Property 2, the request involves rezoning Subject Property 2 from A-1 to CG.
Both subject properties are owned by Paradise Partners, Inc., and located near the southeast corner
of CR 510 and CR 512. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning and land use designation
necessary to develop Subject Property 2 with commercial uses.
On May 25. 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4 to 2 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request.
C'omprehemive Plan Arn dment Review Procedures
The state allows local governments to use alternative adoption procedures for "small scale" plan
amendments that meet certain criteria. Section 163.3187(1)(c) of the Florida Statutes sets the
following criteria for small scale amendments:
June 20, 2000
50
1. The proposed amendment involves 10 or fewer acres;
2. The cumulative effect of the acreage for all small scale amendments in the jurisdiction does
not exceed 80 acres in a calendar year,
3. The proposed amendment does not involve the same property granted a land use designation
change within the prior 12 months;
4. The proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of
property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months;
5. The proposed amendment does not involve a change to the comprehensive plan's text;
6. The subject property is not within an area of critical state concern; and
7. The proposed amendment does not involve increasing residential density above 10 units/acre.
Small scale plan amendments are deemed to have fewer impacts than typical plan amendments and
are eligible for a streamlined adoption process. In contrast to typical plan amendments which require
review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), local governments
may adopt small scale plan amendments without review or approval by DCA.
In this case, the procedures for reviewing the subject comprehensive plan amendment will be as
follows. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducts a public hearing to review the
request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the comprehensive
plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning and Zoning
Commission may recommend approval of or deny the rezoning portion of the request. If the
rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, unless
the denial to rezone is appealed. Following Planning and Zoning Commission action. the Board
takes final action to approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests.
Besides being exempt from DCA review, small scale amendments are also exempt from the state's
statutory limitations on the frequency of adopting comprehensive plan amendments. For example,
although the number of standard plan amendments that a local government may consider is not
limited, the frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is
regulated by state law. According to Florida Statutes, standard plan amendments are limited to twice
per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts standard plan amendment applications only
during the two 'tivindow" months of January and July. All requests submitted during each window
month are processed simultaneously. That method ensures that standard plan amendments will be
adopted no more than twice per calendar year.
State law, however, provides several exceptions to the twice per calendar year limitation. One of
those exceptions is for small scale plan amendments. Consequently, a local government may adopt
small scale amendments, such as the subject plan amendment, without regard for the twice per
calendar year limitation. For that reason, the proposed amendment is exempt from the twice per
calendar year adoption limit.
Land in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of CR 512 and CR 510 contains the subject
properties. Except for a convenience store with a gas station on the corner, and a fruit stand along
June 20, 2000
51
BOOK
•
-q
BOCK 11J rAGE A
CR 510, that area consists of a vacant abandoned citrus grove. In that quadrant, land within 300 feet
of CR 510 and 670 feet of CR 512 is zoned CG. Beyond those limits, land is zoned A-1.
Property at the southwest comer of CR 512 and CR 510 is zoned CL, Limited Commercial District,
and consists of vacant rangeland. Another convenience store with a gas station is at the northwest
corner. Land in that comer is zoned CL. The northeast quadrant consists of undeveloped land
containing a hardwood hammock. In that quadrant, land within approximately 290 feet of CR 512
and 300 feet of CR 510 is zoned CL. North and east of those limits, land is zoned A-1.
Subject Property 1
Subject Property 1 and properties to the north and west are designated CJ, Commercial/Industrial,
on the county's future land use map. That designation permits various commercial and industrial
zoning districts. Land to the south and east of Subject Property 1 is designated L-1, Low -Density
Residential -1, on the county's future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses
with densities up to 3 units/acre.
Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 and properties to the north, south, and east are designated L-1. Land west of
Subject Property 2 is designated C/I.
Consisting of cleared sites, neither subject property contains environmentally significant habitat such
as uplands or wetlands. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject properties are not
within a flood hazard area.
Water lines extend to the subject sites from the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant, while
wastewater lines extend to the sites from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Both CR 510 and CR 512 can provide access to the subject properties. CR 510 is classified as a
real minor arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of CR 510
is a two lane paved road with approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This
segment of CR 510 is programmed for expansion to four lanes by 2020.
West of CR 510, CR 512 is classified as a rural principal arterial roadway on the future roadway
thoroughfare plan map. East of CR 510, CR 512 is classified as a rural minor arterial roadway on
the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. Near CR 510, CR 512 is a two lane paved road with
approximately 100 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This segment of CR 512 is
programmed for expansion to four lanes by 2005.
June 20, 2000
52
•
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. Following a
discussion of plan amendment review standards, this section will include the following:
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's compatibility with surrounding areas;
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• an analysis of the proposed amendment's potential impact on environmental quality.
Unlike most land use designation amendment requests, this request does not involve an increase in
land use intensity. As proposed, the request involves a minor reconfiguration. rather than an
expansion, of the commercial/industrial node.
For this reason, the subject request can be characterized differently from most plan amendments.
Typically, plan amendments involve increases in allowable density or intensity of development. As
such, the typical amendment would result in impacts to public facilities and changes to land use
patterns. Consequently, both the county comprehensive plan and state policy dictate that a high
standard of review is required for typical plan amendments. This standard of review requires
justification for the proposed change based upon adequate data and analysis.
The subject amendment, however, differs significantly from a typical plan amendment request.
Instead of proposing density or intensity increases, the subject amendment involves only a locational
shift in future land uses with no overall increase in land use intensity.
Staffs position is that these different types of plan amendments warrant different standards of
review. Since the typical type of amendment can be justified only by challenging the projections,
need assessments, and standards used to prepare the original plan, a high standard of review is
justified For amendments involving just shifts in land uses and no intensity/density increase, less
justification is necessary. This recognizes that no single land use plan map is correct and that many
variations may conform to accepted land use principles and meet established plan policies.
Both sites comprising this request are located within the County Urban Service Area, an area deemed
suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for..
Transportation, potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stomtwater Management, and Recreation.
The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed
by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities
are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed. For land use
designation amendment and rezoning requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional
concurrency determination application process.
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt
from concurrency requirements. For the subject request, the size of the C/I node will not change,
although the node's shape will be reconfigured. Therefore, this land use amendment and rezoning
request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested land use designation and zoning
changes would not increase the potential land use intensity that the sites could accommodate.
June 20, 2000
53
BOCK hJ VAGE 9'
c:
BOCK hi rAGE T ,
It is important to note that approval of this request will not affect service levels for any public
facility. In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site
development. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand.
Compatibility with the surrounding area is not a major concern for this request. With or without the
proposed amendment's minor reconfiguration, the node's basic circumstances do not change. Those
circumstances are that it contains approximately 50 acres and is located at the intersection of two
major roads.
Most incompatibilities occur where commercial/industrial land abuts residential land. In this case,
all of the land abutting the subject properties is owned by the applicant; therefore, the proposed
amendment would not result in any C/I designated land abutting any residentially designated land
not owned by the applicant. For those reasons, development of the subject properties under the
proposed land use designations and zoning districts will be compatible with surrounding areas.
Land use amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the
comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the county code, the "comprehensive plan may
only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section
163.3177(2), FS." Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land
uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, recreational,
conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions—including plan amendment and rezoning
decisions. While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more
applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following policies.
Future Land Use Element Policv 14.3
In evaluating a land use amendment request, the most �a be met in order is to tuneapprLend Use
Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of f
our use amendment request. These criteria are:
• The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan:
• The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan;
• The proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances
affecting the subject property; or
• The proposed amendment involves a swapor on will notu�icrease the ovn of dera�li landtu�se density
at
separate sites and, that swap or reconfig�uati
or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map.
June 20, 2000
54
•
The proposed land use amendment meets the policy's fourth criterion. As specifically cited in the
policy, the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at
separate sites, and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or
intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. For those reasons, the proposed amendment meets
the fourth criterion of Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 and is consistent with Future Land Use
Element Policy 14.3.
Future Land Use Element Policv 1.11
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that the Low -Density Residential land use designations
are intended for land that is located within the urban service area and near existing urban centers.
Located within the urban service area and near the City of Sebastian, Subject Property I meets those
criteria. Under the proposed amendment, Subject Property 1 would have a Low -Density Residential
land use designation. For that reason, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy
1.11.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the Commercial/Industrial land use designation
shall be limited to lands that are located within the urban service area and near existing urban
centers. Located within the urban service area and near the City of Sebastian, Subject Property 2
meets those criteria. Under the proposed amendment, Subject Property 2 would have a
CommerciaVlndustrial land use designation. For that reason, the request is consistent with Future
Land Use Element Policy 1.15.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20 states that nodes shall have a designated size based on the
intended use and service area population, existing land use pattern and other demand characteristics.
The amount of C/I designated land is based on service area population, the existing land use pattern,
and other demand characteristics. The proposed amendment will not alter the amount of C/I
designated land. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element
Policy 1.20.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 states that 70% of the land area of a node should be developed
with non-residential and non-agricultural uses before that node is considered for expansion. The
intent of this policy is to regulate increases in the amount of C/I designated land. Since the proposed
amendment does not increase in the amount of C/I designated land in the subject node. Future Land
Use Element Policy 1.22's 70% developed standard does not apply to this amendment.
Economic Development Element Policy 1.8
Economic Development Element Policy 1.8 states that the county shall evaluate the size and location
of nodes to ensure they can properly provide for growth. Since the proposed amendment
reconfigures the subject node to better provide for growth, the proposed amendment implements
Economic Development Element Policy 1.8.
June 20, 2000
55
•
QOL'K iIJ t'4E 7� ;moi
r
0
SOCKJ) PAGE ! -11
Consistency Summary
As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based upon
this analysis, staff determined that the proposed land use designation amendment and rezoning is
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The subject properties are disturbed sites. As such, they contain no wetlands, or environmentally
important or environmentally sensitive habitat. Therefore, development of the subject properties
under the proposed land use designations and zoning districts would not be anticipated to adversely
impact any significant environmental resources.
The proposed amendment reconfigures a commercial/industrial node to increase land use efficiency
and facilitate economic development. No increase in the amount of C/I designated land or land use
densityiintensity is proposed. The subject request is consistent with the comprehensive plan,
compatible with all surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts on the environment
or the provision of public services. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment and rezoning by adopting the attached
ordinances.
1. Summary Page - Subject Property 1
2. Summary Page - Subject Property 2
3. Land Use Designation Amendment Application
4. Rezoning Application
5. Approved Minutes of the May 25, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
6. Donna Keys's Statement to the Planning and Zoning Commission
7. Land Use Designation Amendment Ordinance
8. Rezoning Ordinance
June 20, 2000
56
0
I
(CLERK'S NOTE: At approximately 9:55 a.m., during the
discussion of this item, Chairman Adams left the meeting in
order to travel to a county -related appointment.)
Director Keating responded to Commissioner Stanbridge's questions concerning
frontage on County Roads 512 and 510.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Macht advised that he did not plan to support the request. He credited
the author of Attachment 6 in the backup for a very compelling argument against approval.
He also feared setting a precedent. He had been told that signs had already been placed on
the property which indicated that the requested/new zoning had already been established.
Finally, there is a corridor plan pending which involves two municipalities and the County;
he wanted to see the matter deferred until the corridor plan has become effective.
Dan Bryant, owner of Paradise Partners, asked to be recognized and, with the
concurrence of the Commissioners, Chairman Adams reopened the public hearing to allow
Mr. Bryant to address the Board.
Mr. Bryant recounted that when he bought the property his banker had advised him
that it was configured wrong and that he needed to meet with County staff to discuss the
matter. He was told that Indian River County had made this type of change so the precedent
had already been established. In fact, at a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, he
recalled that Mr. Keating explained that such a change had been made for another applicant;
he believed it was the Kennedy property. He recalled that Mr. Keating had said this
June 20, 2000
57
BOOK �� JL ,J r --AGE 7
F^�
BOOK jL.J MAGE tP
ordinance existed to allow corrections. He acknowledged that he had put a sign on the
property. When he met with staff, he was advised that the ordinance gave the right to try to
correct errors and end up with a win-win situation for the property owner and Indian River
County; there is a finite supply of commercial property and why not configure it for its
highest and best use.
Mr. Bryant continued that he understood corridor plans and had complied 100% with
the Wabasso Corridor Plan when he built the Shark Mart at CR 510/CR 512 without even
being part of the corridor plan. He is more than willing to comply with the CR 510 Corridor
Plan; he wants the area to look good and suggested compliance be included within the
agreement. He reiterated that the precedent has been established; he is not trying to
manipulate anything. He wanted to be on record to say that they are not speculators, but own
and develop all their properties within this community.
Commissioner Macht asked for staff to comment on the zoning and whether or not
a precedent had been set.
Director Keating stated that staff was not contending that the property was improperly
zoned, that was the banker's opinion. Staff had worked with Mr. Bryant and did not see
where his proposal would conflict with any Comprehensive Plan policies. Director Keating
thought there had not been a precedent. He explained what he had said at the PZC
concerning a swap that had been done with the Kennedy property and explained the
reasoning behind that swap.
Acting County Attorney O'Brien advised that this is a legislative act and. the Board
has wide discretion in how they perceive it.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Ginn, to approve staff's recommendation.
June 20, 2000
58
Under discussion, Commissioner Stanbridge stated she was unable to support the
motion and recalled her PZC role in the configuration of these commercial node areas. She
recalled concern about the traffic flow and other impacts which were the reasons for keeping
the node close to the intersection and not letting it expand along the roadway. She felt the
present commercial area is sufficient and there is an opportunity for the developer to utilize
that area as is. She agreed that Article 6 gave a very compelling argument against this
rezoning and was pleased to see it.
Vice Chairman Ginn announced that Chairman Adams had left the meeting and
assumed the chair. She feared there was going to be a tie vote and asked the Commissioners
if they wished to table the matter to a future date when Chairman Adams could be present.
Acting County Attorney O'Brien stated the Board had a quorum and could act if they
chose to do so.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
failed 2-2 (Vice Chairman Ginn & Commissioner Tippin in
favor; Commissioners Macht and Stanbridge opposed).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Chairman Adams absent) agreed to postpone a final decision
due to the absence of Chairman Adams and bring the matter
back at their next meeting on July 11, 2000.
June 20, 2000
59
BOOK WAGE u
Ir I
BOOK.1 r'AGE d °
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-018 - REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 446.5 ACRES TO PD AND CONCEPTUAL PD
PLAN APPROVAL FOR RIVER BEND - REQUEST OF SHOPCO
ADVISORY CORP.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION HAS BEEN FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of June 14, 2000 with the
aid of the site map (page 122 of the backup) and graphics (pages 123 & 124), and focused
on the buffering plan (page 128) displayed on the overhead projector:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D SI N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP t /
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, P
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy. AICP
Senior Planner. Current Development
DATE: June 14, 2000
SUBJECT: Shopco Advisory Corp's Request to Rezone Approximately 4465 Acres of
Property from RS -1 (Single -Family up to 1 unit/acre), RS -3 (Single -Family up
to 3 unitstacre), RM -3 (Residential Multi -Family up to 3 unitstacre), and CG
(General Commercial) to PD (Planned Development) and to Receive Conceptual
PD Plan Approval for a Development to be Known as River Bend
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 20. 2000.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
This is a request by Shopco Advisory Corp., through its agent Knight, McGuire and Associates. Inc.,
to rezone approximately 446.5 acres. The majority of the project's acreage (356.82 acres) is
currently zoned RS -3. In addition. 62.93 acres are zoned RS -1;'_'4.84 acres are zoned RM -3, and
the remaining 1.91 acres are zoned CG (located adjacent to US #1). As part of the rezoning request.
a conceptual PD plan has been submitted for review and approval.
June 20, 2000
0 40
The subject site is located north of the North Relief Canal and Grand Harbor, between US #1 and
the Indian River Lagoon, south of 63rd Street. The purpose of this request is to secure a zoning
which allows construction of single and multi -family dwellings, an 18 hole golf course.
clubhouse/recreation facility, and accessory commercial uses internal to the project. In essence. the
proposed project is like a smaller, lower density Grand Harbor.
♦ Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of May 25. 2000. the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the PD rezoning with conditions
(see attachment #8). In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that a Type
"B" buffer be provided around the southern and southeastern portion of a not -included 5 acre parcel
located on the south side of 63'd Street that is surrounded on three sides by the River Bend project.
♦ Development Approval Options Available to the Developer
Since the site is a'mix of zoning districts. the applicant must rezone the property to a type of
residential zoning that allows for the proposed mix of residential development and recreation and
accessory commercial uses. Any rezoning action must comply with the site's land use designations
which are L-1, Low Density Residential 1 (up to 3 units/acre), C-2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres), and C/I
(Commercial/Industrial). There are two options available to the developer to seek approval of the
proposed project. Either of the two options, if approved, would allow the applicant to proceed with
a residential project. These options are as follows:
Rezone the site to a standard residential zoning district (e.g. RM -3) which allows a density
of no more than 3 units/acre, and propose development under a PD (planned development)
application for special exception use approval.
2. Rezone the site to a PD zoning district that allows residential, golf course, and accessory
commercial uses and that is tied to a conceptual PD plan proposing a density not exceeding
3 units/acre.
The developer has opted for a PD rezoning, option #2 above. If approved, the proposal would
effectively rezone the property and approve the conceptual PD plan in one set of public hearings.
♦ The PD Zoning District, Generally
Several residential projects have been approved through the PD rezoning process. These include
Pointe West, Old Orchid. and Citrus Springs. Unlike standard zoning districts. PD districts have no
specific lot size or dimensional criteria. Instead. the PD district is based on the underlying land use
plan designation for density and use limitations, and on compatibility requirements. In the PD
zoning district, setbacks and other typical zoning district regulations are established on a project by
project basis through approval of a conceptual PD plan. Adopted as part of the PD zoning for a
property, the conceptual plan establishes the lot size and dimensional standards for the project.
A rezoning to the PD district requires submission of a binding conceptual PD plan which. along with
certain PD district requirements. limits uses and sets -forth specific development standards on the
site. Thus, a PD rezoning allows a unique PD district to be developed specifically for each
development site.
In this case, the conceptual PD plan proposes the phased development of 650 residential units,
including a mix of single-family units (336) and duplex units (314). Also included in the project
will be an 18 -hole golf course, clubhouse, recreational amenities, common open space, lakes, certain
buffers, and an internal accessory commercial area limited to neighborhood commercial uses.
June 20, 2000
A1
600K rAGE T"19
COOK hJ PAGE 7�5i0
In planning staffs opinion, the PD rezoning option is the best alternative for approving residential
development on the subject site. Unlike other zoning districts, the PD zoning district allows the
county to consider the appropriateness of the proposed development design and project benefits as
part of the rezoning request, and to attach conditions to the PD plan approval.
♦ The PD Rezoning Process
The PD rezoning review, approval, and development process is as follows:
STEP 1 Rezoning and conceptual PD plan approval: Review and recommendation made by
staff and by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Final action taken by the Board
of County Commissioners.
STEP 2 Preliminary PD plan (combination of site plan and preliminary plat) approval:
Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action taken by the Planning and
Zoning Commission. subject to the Board's action on the rezoning request.
STEP 3 Land Development Permit or Permit Waiver. Reviewed and issued b_v staff for
construction of subdivision improvements (roads. utilities, drainage).
STEP 4 Building Permit(s): Reviewed and issued by staff for construction of buildings.
STEP 5 Final PD Plat approval: Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action
taken by the Board of County Commissions.
STEP 6 Certificate of Occupancy: Reviewed and issued by staff for use and occupancy of
buildings.
The applicant is pursuing STEP 1 of the process.
Once a conceptual PD plan is approved, only minor modifications to the conceptual plan can be
approved at a staff level. Any changes proposed to an approved conceptual plan that would reduce
setbacks, intensify the site use (e.g. increase the maximum number of lots), or reduce compatibility
elements (e.g. reduce buffering) can be approved only via a process involving public hearings held
by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners.
♦ Proposed PD District for the Project Site
The majority of the subject site has an L-1, low density residential, land use designation. with a
portion also designated C-2 conservation, and a small area designated C/I Commercial/Industrial.
The L-1 land use designation allows a variety of single-family districts and a multi -family zoning
district, each of which has a maximum density of 3 units/acre or less. Since the land use designation
controls the use of the property by limiting the zoning districts applicable to the property, any
rezoning must be compatible with the uses and densities allowed by the property's land use
designations. Once a specific PD rezoning is approved for a site, the applicable PD conceptual plan
adopted as part of the rezoning will limit the type of specific uses and the densities allowed on the
subject site. The conceptual plan will also establish the dimensional criteria applicable to the site.
Although PD zoning district parameters are flexible. certain standards related to uses, compatibility
(buffering), infrastructure improvements, dimensional criteria, and open space areas are set forth in
Chapter 915 (P.D. Process and Standards for Development ordinance) of the county's land
development regulations (LDRs). The River Bend project proposes 11 residential development
..pods", with separate standards for each single-family development type based on lot width. Several
of the pods contain multi -family units which will be site planned at a later date through the
June 20, 2000
62
•
preliminary PD plan process. Each single-family pod contains a certain residential product type with
corresponding lot size, width, and setback standards. For review purposes, the standards/waivers
proposed for the individual single-family product types are compared to the RS -3 zoning district
standards in the chart below.
COMPARISON OF RS -3 & RIVER BEND SINGLE-FAMILY "POD" STANDARDSIWAIVERS
RS -3 River Bend River Bend River Bend
Single Family Single Family Single Family
55'160' Lots 70' Lots 80' Lots
Minimum Lot Size 12,000 s.f. ® ® 12,000 s.f.
Minimum Lot Width 80' ® ® 80'
Minimum Yard Setbacks
imary Residence/Blde
- Front
25'
25'
25'
25'
- Side
15'
- Rear
25'
25'
1 25'
1 25'
Pool & Patio/Decks
- Side
15'
- Rear
10'
10'
10'
10'
Maximum Building
Coverage on Individual
Lot
30%
30%
Minimum Open Space on
Individual Lot
40%
®
40%
*Note: The unit will be set back 5' on one side and IU' on the other.
Waivers from the RS -3 zoning standards have been highlighted black .
USE TABLE
RS -3 District Uses
Single -Family detached, accessory dwelling units.
places of worship, child care, golf courses, recreational
uses. and other uses as listed in LDR section 911.07.
PROPOSED PD DISTRICT USES
Same uses as RS -3, and multi -family units, and accessory
commercial in accordance with LDR Chapter 915 PD
limitations. Commercial uses will be regulated by PD
ordinance section 915.12 and limited to CN (Neighborhood
Commercial) type uses.
It should be noted that, if the PD rezoning is approved, the approved conceptual PD plan will be
included as an actual exhibit to the rezoning ordinance. In addition to the above referenced
standards, the conceptual plan also regulates buffering, certain design improvements, and the overall
subdivision layout.
June 20, 2000
63
BOOK si fret rl
•
REZONING ANALYSIS:
The project's 446.50 acres consist mostly of existing citrus groves, but also include 43.79 acres of
native upland and 66.10 acres of wetlands. The native uplands exist in three separate areas within
the project: those areas are located in the southwest comer, the east central area. and the northwest
portion of the project site. The 66.10 acres of wetlands are located on the east side of the subject
property and are considered estuarine wetlands.
• South of the subject site is the North Relief Canal/Sedimentation Basin. Whisper
Lakes golf course which is zoned CG and RM -6; and Grand Harbor's River Club
golf course and Harbor area which are zoned RM -6 and CG, respectively.
• East of the subject site is the Indian River Lagoon.
North of the subject site is 63rd Street and citrus groves zoned RM -3, RS -3, and RS -1.
Also, there is a 5 acre "not included" parcel along the site's 63'° Street boundary that
is zoned RS -3 and contains a single-family home and citrus trees. This not included
parcel is surrounded on three sides by the River Bend project.
West. The project's west boundary is irregular. with the project having some US #1
frontage on the north and south ends of its western perimeter. The properties across
(west of) US #1 are zoned industrial. IL, with some of the property vacant and some
developed as storage or contractors trades buildings. Where the subject project does
not extend to US #1, the majority of the property between the project's western
boundary and US #1 is zoned RM -3 with a small segment zoned CG.
As is standard for PDs, the development will have a minimum 25' setback from all perimeter
property lines.
•Future Land Use Pattern: The subject site has L-1, C-2. and CA land use designations.
South of the subject site, the Whisper Lakes golf course has a C/I. Commercial/Industrial
land use designation along US #1 and an M-1, Medium Density (up to 8 units/acre)
designation on the remainder. The River Club golf course has an M-1 land use designation.
while the Harbor area has a C/I land use designation.
East of the subject property is the Indian River Lagoon.
West of the subject site. all of the property west of US #1 has a C/I land use designation. The
majority of the property east of US #1, lying adjacent to the west perimeter of the subject
property has an L-1 designation. with a small portion at the south end of the west perimeter
having a CA land use designation.
North of the subject site. the upland property has an L-1 designation, while the wetlands have
a C-2 designation. This is similar to the subject property.
•Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with the policies of the comprehensive plan and
must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use
Map. Consistency with goals. objectives, and policies is also essential. The goals. objectives and
June 20, 2000
64
policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan
which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's
development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all
county land development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important,
some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability
for this request are the following policies and objectives.
Future Land Use Policies 5.3 and 5.4
Policv 5.3: Indian River county zoning districts shall permit a variety of residential building and
development styles.
Policv 5.4: Indian River County LDRs shall contain a special Planned Development (PD) zoning
district. That district shall be designated as an overlay on the County Zoning Atlas. The PD zoning
districris intended to provide for the development of projects which require flexibility in order to
maximize open space. conserve natural features, provide alternative designs, incorporate recreational
facilities, and create a mix of uses.
The proposed PD is consistent with these policies in that the PD plan accommodates estuarine
wetland conservation. provides improved treatment of some off-site drainage that outfalls into the
Lagoon, and proposes a variety of residential product types in a design that exceeds open space
minimums and buffers project perimeters.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-1. Low Density Residential 1. land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. In addition. Future Land
Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within an existing or future
urban service area.
Because the subject property is located within an area designated as L-1 on the county's future land
use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district
provides for residential uses that are less than 3 units/acre in accordance with the L-1.designation.
the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
While the referenced policies and objectives are particularly applicable to this request, other
comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the
subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based on population projections
and current development patterns, residential development in this area of the county is expected to
increase and eventually become the dominant land use. Since the project area is located within the
Urban Service Area and is designated for low-density residential development, the proposed
rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
•Compatibility
Compatibility is an important consideration in any PD rezoning request. In this case, it is
important to consider compatibility of the proposed project with properties in the immediate
area and those within the general area.
June 20, 2000
Immediate Area: Other than a 5 acre out parcel on its north perimeter, the proposed
development abuts non -project properties only on its west perimeter.
65
BOOK 11J PAGE E
BOOK iij mu
The abutting parcels along the project's west perimeter lie between the subject site
and US #1 and are accessed from US #1. This area consists of approximately 16
parcels, with the southern 5 parcels being zoned CG and the northern 11 parcels
zoned RM -3. The applicant is proposing to construct a golf course along the majority
of the west property line, which adequately addresses most compatibility issues for
those abutting parcels. Along a segment of the project's west and north boundaries,
the PD plan proposes an internal project roadway. These segments of perimeter
project roadways will be buffered with a perimeter double frontage buffer.
The abutting parcel which will be impacted the most by the proposed development
is the 5 acre out parcel located south of 63'd Street. That parcel will be surrounded
on three sides by the proposed project. A letter from the property owner of the not -
included parcel is included as attachment #7, and includes some non -buffer items that
have been agreed to between private parties. The applicant is proposing to construct
golf course and "created uplands" improvements on the east and south sides of the
5 acre out parcel. Along the west perimeter of the out parcel, the PD plan proposes
70' wide lots and a Type "C" buffer within the project's 25' perimeter setback. In
addition, the proposed 70' wide lots have a significant depth of at least 180' including
the 25' wide buffer. Staff is recommending a change to the proposed plan to require
a Type "B" buffer with a 25' setback to any structure. including pool improvements.
alons the west and south sides of the out parcel and along the south portion of the out
parcel's east perimeter.
General Area: The project site is located between US #1 on the west. the Indian
River Lagoon on the east. 63rd Street on the north. and the North Relief Canal on the
south. Presently, the area surrounding the subject site has scattered development,
with the majority of the development being within Grand Harbor or along US #1.
The areas south of the subject site allow more intense development than the L-1
designation of the subject site. The area west of the subject site is either L-1 or C/I.
designations which would allow similar or more intense development than what
River Bend proposes. In addition. the project's multi -family units, smaller lot areas,
clubhouse, and neighborhood commercial areas are located internal to the project and
are generally separated from adjacent areas by significant green areas and buffering
provided by the proposed golf course.
*Proposed Development
The applicant is proposing three pods of multi -family units, these pods (pods A -C) will be
located in the southwest portion of the project. The multi -family pods could consist of
multiple unit multi -story buildings. None of the multi -family pods will be located adjacent
to the project perimeter, but will be separated from the project perimeter by golf course or
other common green area. The single-family pods (pods D -K) will be spread throughout the
remainder of the project site and have lots ranging in width from 55' to 80'. As a measure
to ensure compatibility, the applicant is proposing to construct the golf course improvements
along the majority of the project perimeter. Almost all of the single-family pods will be
separated from the project perimeter by golf course or other open space. The most notable
exception to this is in the northwest corner, where some project related roads will be on the
perimeter and buffered with a double frontage road buffer. In staffs opinion, the buffers and
setbacks recommended by staff ensure the compatibility of this project design and PD
rezoning with the overall area and surrounding properties.
Environmental Impacts and Concurrency: These issues will be analyzed in the PD
plan analysis.
June 20, 2000
40 0
•Public Benefits of the PD Plan:
Recently, the planning staff has been asking PD applicants to identify the public benefits that
their project will provide in exchange for the county's flexibility with the project's design
criteria. In this case. the applicant has indicated that he will be treating run-off from
approximately 90 off-site acres. Presently, an FDOT out -fall ditch runs through the site
conveying the stormwater run-off from west of US #1 to the Indian River Lagoon. The
applicant is proposing to incorporate this run-off into the River Bend stormwater system,
providing treatment for run-off which is presently untreated and could be left untreated, if
the out -fall ditch were simply rerouted.
An additional public benefit staff has identified is the preservation of estuarine wetlands. If
the applicant places a conservation easement over the estuarine wetland area as part of the
PD plan approval, then the benefit of such preservation would be secured. The conservation
easement would need to be established prior to or via the final plat approval and could allow
for limited recreation/pedestrian access for project residents. The applicant has not objected
to such a conservation easement condition.
*PD Plan Analysis:
1. Size: 446.5 acres
2. Zoning Classifications:
Current: RS -1. Residential Single -Family (up to 1 unit/acre)
RS -3, Residential Single -Family (up to 3 units/acre)
RM -3. Residential Multi -Family (up to 3 units/acre)
CG, General Commercial
Proposed: PD. Planned Development (up to 1.75 units/acre)
Land Use Designations: L-1, Low Density 1 (up to 3 units/acre)
C-2, Conservation 2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres)
CIL Commercial/Industrial
4. Density: 650 units on 446.5 acres = 1.46 units/gross acre
Note: Upland density is 650 units on 380.40 acres = 1.71 units/upland acre
5. Open Space: Required: 41.40%
Provided: 56.40%
Note: The open space required percentage is based on the upland zoning standard of 40%
and wetland zoning standard of 50%. The 56.40% provided figure does not include any open
space credit for any lake area provided. Thus, the provided figure is true green space on
individual lots and golf course/common areas.
6. Recreation Area: Required: 7.80 acres
Provided: 192.18 acres
Note: Recreation areas include clubhouse, golf course, walking trails, pool. and tennis
facility.
June 20, 2000
67
SOCK J t''AGE i �+
BOCK J 1 J r A G E 750
Phasing: Phase I will consist of the main road. all of the other core infrastructure including
utilities, the master stormwater system. and the golf course. Subsequent phases will consist
of the residential pods and the utilities necessary to serve those pods.
S. Environmental Issues:
Uplands: Since the site is over 5 acres. the native upland set aside requirement of
LDR section 929.05 applies. There are three separate areas of native upland
communities comprising a total of 43.79 acres of native upland habitat on the overall
446.5 acres.
Based upon the county's specific criteria for golf course development. at least 30%
of existing native uplands within the project's proposed golf course area must be
preserved. Existing native uplands in non -golf course areas are subject to the county-
wide 15% setaside requirement. The conceptual plan accommodates these
requirements and the preliminary PD plan will provide specific setaside calculations.
Wetlands: The majority of the wetlands on the project are impounded estaurine
wetlands along the eastern edge of the development. The only freshwater wetlands
associated with the project are jurisdictional wetlands in grove ditches which will be
filled as part of the development. The applicant is proposing only minor impacts
within the estuarine wetlands. Such impacts relate to a proposed boardwalk and
observation gazebo on the river. An existing din road that crosses the wetland area
will remain and provide access for the Mosquito Control District and project
pedestrians. As indicated earlier in this report. the PD plan accommodates estuarine
wetland conservation. To ensure such conservation. it is staff's opinion that the
developer should provide a conservation easement over the estuarine wetlands either
prior to or via the PD final plat. A formal mitigation plan will be approved via
jurisdictional agency and county wetland resource permits for this project.
Endangered Species: Staff is not aware of any endangered species which will be
significantly impacted by the proposed development.
9. Concurrency Management: A conditional concurrency certificate has been issued for this
project. Thus. all concurrency related requirements related to conceptual PD plan and
rezoning approval have been satisfied.
10. Stormwater Management: As with standard single-family subdivisions. a conceptual
stormwater management plan is required prior to conceptual PD plan approval. For this
project. a conceptual stormwater management plan has been approved by the Public Works
Department. This plan proposes a system of stormwater ponds within the golf course and .
residential pods. Final review and approval of the stormwater management plan shall be
accomplished through the land development permit process.
11. Thoroughfare Plan:
June 20, 2000
The Thoroughfare Plan classifies US #1 as a major arterial roadway which requires
an ultimate right-of-way of 160'. Presently. 120' of right-of-way exists for US #1.
The proposed conceptual plan accommodates dedication/acquisition of the additional
20' of right-of-way needed from this project site to achieve the ultimate right-of-way
width. Therefore. the PD plan is consistent with the US #1 Thoroughfare Plan
standard.
68
0
The Thoroughfare Plan depicts an unlabeled thoroughfare east of US #1 that lies
between 57'" Street and 65t° Street, and generally aligns with 61' Street, which exists
and is labeled as such on the plan west of US #1. The purpose of the unlabeled
thoroughfare segment east of US #1 is to provide adequate access to parcels located
between US #1 and the Indian River Lagoon. in an area lying between 57' Street and
651h Street. The proposed development consolidates many of these parcels and
provides adequate access. For the non -project parcels south of 63rd Street. the
applicant will improve 631 Street to provide access to these parcels. Thus, under the
proposed PD plan. 63`d Street will be improved and will serve as the unlabeled
Thoroughfare Plan road segment for the area east of US #1, lying between 57th Street
and 651h Street. In the opinion of planning and attorney's office staff, this proposal
is consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (see attachment #4).
12. Traffic Circulation: The project's proposed primary accesses will be from 63`d Street and
either US #1 or 531d Street/Indian River Boulevard. The project will have 2 access
connections to 63rd Street. The western connection will serve the proposed 60 lot "Pod K",
and provide a secondary access to the overall project. The eastern connection will be the
project's primary 631d Street entrance and is integrated into the project's internal road system.
For the project's main southern entrance, the developer is proposing two alternative access
options. The first option is a connection to US #1 just north of the North Relief Canal; staff
views this as the most likely option. The second. and more speculative option is to extend
a private roadway south across the North Relief Canal and the Whisper Lakes golf course site
and connect that new roadway to 53'd Street at the intersection of 53'd Street and Indian River
Boulevard. Either option is acceptable to staff. Approval of the conceptual PD plan will
allow either option.
A traffic impact analysis MA) has been reviewed and approved by Traffic Engineering. The
TIA is based upon the US #1 connection and does not take into account the option of
extending a roadway to 53'd Street/Indian River Boulevard. If the connection to 53'd
Street/Indian River Boulevard is the option pursued by the applicant, a revised TIA will need
to be submitted with the preliminary PD plan. Under such circumstances, the applicant
would be required to construct the off-site improvements indicated as a result of the revised
TIA. The review of the submitted TIA based on the US #1 entrance design indicates the
following improvements are required to address anticipated project traffic impacts:
1. Southbound left -turn lane on US #1 at 631' Street, and
2. Northbound right -turn lane on US #1 at 631d Street, and
3. Northbound right -tum lane on US #1 at the project's southernmost entrance on US
#1, and
4. Eastbound right -tum lane on 63' Street at the project's primary 63'd Street entrance.
5. A westbound left -turn lane on 63rd Street at US #1.
A developer's agreement will be required to specify and control the timing of these required
improvements. This developer's agreement will be brought to the Board of County
Commissioners later in the project development process and will need to be approved by the
Board prior to the issuance of a land development permit for the project.
June 20, 2000
Mie
BOOK .LIJ SAGE i
•
BOCK hi CAGE I j J
13. Utilities: Connection to public water and wastewater, and utilization of reuse water are
required and proposed by the applicant. These utility provisions have been approved by the
Health Department and the County Department of Utility Services. The applicant will extend
water, sewer, and reuse water improvements to serve the site pursuant to separate utility
developer's agreements with the Department of Utility Services. These utilities developer s
agreements will be brought to the Board later in the project development process and will
need to be approved by the Board prior to the issuance of the land development permit for
the project.
14. Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plant: While the subject site is well within the Urban Service
Area, there is still significant citrus production in the area. Therefore, the development
should be made to be subject to the Carribean fruit fly host plan restriction to ensure
compatibility with citrus groves in the area. Such restriction will need to be noted on each
final plat for the project.
15. Dedications and Improvements:
June 20, 2000
Sidewalks: A 5' wide public sidewalk is required to be constructed along the site's
US #1 and 631d Street frontages. The sidewalks are shown on the conceptual plan and
will need to be constructed with the appropriate phases.
Paving of 63'd Street: The developer will need to pave 63`d Street from US #1 to the
proposed maintenance building driveway. The paving of 63cd Street will need to
occur with the first phase, since the project's main entrance is on 63rd Street.
Pedestrian Circulation: The applicant has submitted an approvable pedestrian
circulation plan that provides an 8' wide sidewalk along the main internal
"north/south" roadway and sidewalks internal to each development pod. In addition,
pedestrians will be able to use the golf course paths and trails which interconnect the
pods, clubhouse, recreation facilities, and the internal accessory commercial area.
Reuse Water. To satisfy one of the criteria for golf course development, the applicant
is required to accept reuse water for irrigation purposes. The utility developer's
agreement will provide for the construction of the reuse facilities.
Mosquito Control: The applicant has agreed to provide access for the Indian River
County Mosquito Control District for mosquito control purposes. Such access to the
overall project, especially the wetland areas, will be provided through the platting
process and is noted on the conceptual PD plan.
Accessory Commercial: The applicant is proposing a maximum build -out of 13,000
sq. fL of accessory commercial building area. This is allowed based on the criteria
of PD ordinance section 915.12 which relates commercial area to the number of
project units. The accessory commercial location is over 1.000 ft. to the nearest.
project perimeter and is separated from the perimeters by residential units and the
golf course. This design generally meets the criteria of section 915.1. A more
specific design and layout of the accessory commercial area, and signage for the
commercial uses. will be reviewed and approved at the preliminary PD plan level.
631 Street Right-of-Wav: The applicant will need to dedicate without compensation
the project's fairshare of 63rd Street right-of-way to complete the required local road
minimum width of 60'. The conceptual PD plan accommodates this dedication. The
dedication will need to occur prior to the issuance of a land development permit.
70
0 0
Road Names: The applicant is requesting the use of named roads rather than
numbered roads which fit into the county's street number grid system. Staff has
denied this request, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has upheld the staff s
action. The Board of County Commissioners should also deny this request because
the applicant meets none of the section 951 LDR criteria that would exempt the
project from using street numbers. These criteria are as follows:
(4) Named roads:
(a) The requirement of number designations for roads in the
unincorporated county shall not apply to named roads established
prior to the date of this chapter.
(b) All new roads established in the unincorporated county shall be
issued a number designation in conformance with the grid pattern as
described herein, with the following exceptions:
Continuations of existing, named roads (roads with name
designations only), or
2. Roads on the barrier island, or
3. Private roads within a planned development or a private
subdivision that do not fit into the county's existing grid
system of east -west and north -south roads.
At the time of development plan application, staff shall apply these
criteria in its review of requests for use of road names. Staff
determinations shall be final unless appealed pursuant to the
provisions of 951.09(2).
The applicant is not continuing a named road pattern, and the project is not on the barrier island.
Also, the roads within the subdivision can fit into the county's overall roadway numbering system.
Therefore, the applicant should be required to meet the LDR requirements and use the street
numbers, such as 21' Avenue and 62n4 Street which have been assigned to the project by planning
staff.
16. Landscape and Buffering Plan: The conceptual PD plan meets the criteria of Chapter 926
for conceptual PD approval. Detailed landscape plans will be submitted with the preliminary
planned developments. The buffering identified on the conceptual plan is acceptable with
the upgrade recommended by staff that a Type 'B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature be
provided along the south and west sides of the 5 acre out parcel and extend over the southern
portion of the out parcel's east property line. This buffering condition is consistent with the
Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation. Generally, the areas where buffering
is needed are limited since the golf course extends along much of the project perimeter and
addresses many of the compatibility issues and buffer requirements.
*Goff Course Specific Land Use Criteria: Golf courses are subject to the following specific land
use criteria which can be waived or modified through the PD process:
June 20, 2000
71
BOOK 3 rAuE 75 9
I
BOOK 11.�17 fAUC
1. Golf courses and accessory facilities shall not be interpreted to include freestanding
commercial miniature golf courses and/or driving ranges or other unenclosed
commercial amusements;
Note: The conceptual PD plan verifies that the golf course is a conventional golf
course.
2. No major accessory use or principal building or structure shall be located closer than
one hundred (100) feet to any lot line which abuts a residentially designated property;
however, the one hundred (100) foot setback may be reduced to normal zoning
district setbacks if the use of the abutting residentially designated property is non-
residential (e.g. institutional, recreation, community services uses) and if a type "B"
buffer with six (6) foot opaque feature is provided between the building and
structures and the abutting residentially designated property.
Note: The applicant has agreed to provide the 100' setbacks from any lot line which
abuts a residentially designated property and requests that the maintenance building
be allowed to be a minimum of 25' from the 63rd Street right-of-way, provided a
Type `B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature is provided along the north and east sides
of the maintenance building. This is acceptable to staff.
3. Golf courses shall. to the most reasonable extent, retain and preserve native
vegetation over at least thirty (30) percent of the total upland area of the course due
to their characteristically, high water demand and heavy nutrient loads;
Note: The applicant has agreed to preserve 30% of the native uplands for the golf
course. The preserved areas are accommodated by the conceptual design and will be
specifically determined at preliminary PD plan review for the golf area with the
native upland habitat area.
4. The golf courses shall be designed so that any lighting is shielded and directed away
from residential areas:
Note: No such outdoor lighting is proposed.
5. Type "B" screening shall be provided between golf maintenance facilities and
adjacent residentially designated property within two hundred (200) feet of the golf
maintenance facility.
Note: The maintenance building will be within 200' of the north and east property
lines and a Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature will be provided along those
property lines.
CONCLUSION:
Subject to recommended conditions, the requested PD rezoning and corresponding conceptual PD
plan are compatible with the surrounding area. consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, meet all
concurrency requirements, and are consistent with the site's L-1. (Low Density 1 up to 3 units/acre),
land use designation. The subject property is suitable for residential development given its
surrounding future land use designation and zoning pattern, and its proximity and direct access to
63'd Street and US #1 or 53'd Street/Indian River Boulevard.
June 20, 2000
72
•
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approval of the PD rezoning
request and the PD conceptual plan, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall use road numbers in accordance with LDR Chapter 951
standards.
2. A Type `B" buffer shall be provided along the west, south, and southeast sides of the
5 acre not -included parcel located immediately south of 63rd Street.
3. Prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the applicant shall:
a. Apply for and obtain preliminary PD plan approval from the Planning and
Zoning Commission, and
b. Obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of a developer's agreement
regarding provision of water, sewer, and reuse water utility improvements,
and
C. Obtain Board of County Commissioners approval of a developer's agreement
regarding the required off-site traffic -related improvements, and
d. Dedicate without compensation the project's share of the minimum local road
right-of-way for 63'd Street.
4. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for any respective project phase
or POD, the applicant shall:
a. Construct any off-site roadway improvements required for that phase or POD.
in accordance with an approved developer's agreement, and
b. Construct any other required improvements such as sidewalks and buffers
that are tied to that specific phase.
Prior to or via the final plat, the applicant shall establish a conservation easement
over the estuarine wetlands as depicted on the conceptual PD plan.
6. Via the appropriate final plat(s), the developer shall dedicate access easements
acceptable to the Indian River Mosquito Control District.
7. Via the final plat(s), a restrictive covenant shall be established on the project site
prohibiting Carribean fruit fly host plants.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Conceptual PD Plan
4. Thoroughfare Plan letter
5. Openspace, Buffer Plan, and Lot Size Plan
6. Detail of Not -included Parcel
7. Letter from Property Owner of Not -included Parcel
8. Approved Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
9. Rezoning Ordinance
June 20, 2000
73
unman diva Ca j AOOfzvea j Dale
Aomir.
Sega!
e�uagei
,{r
�� 4 by
Dew. j
r i J c1
RUSK Mgr.
BOOK tnUE 1 ` 1
•
L-
RM -4
Y
A-1
Ia.1 RMI -3
'u► CG
♦ --- RM -6
ML
i ° CG ;
v0000 ca-!
oopd� .. ooQat
P�a�p�+,p�pe adi
ILMMINIPP
WW-,..Ay'j
I' IN
A
•
•
RIVER BEND GOLF CLUB P.D.
SITE PLAN & OPEN SPACE
MEN,
kp MY
W LA�DB
N
SERVAT1014 FASEMMY
r
O
O
O
C-3
C:3
co
MEN,
kp MY
W LA�DB
N
SERVAT1014 FASEMMY
O
O
O
N
4)
C: -D
U
O
n
RIVER BEND GOLF CLUB P.D.
SITE PLAN & OPEN SPACE
WETLANDS
es 10 A,
INDIAN RIVER (ARMS WATER MAlUfdlfEM OIASY RILT KIRIN RFI Iff CANALRSG—HF 6V—_.__..
Ile. -2k\ r— –
--SCAM .*
0
•
•
-- STRFFT
p
r------------------
\�
\\
I g
52
\\
i
CONST SWALE
TO PROVIDE
L
1
W
2
POSITIVE. LEGAL \ \ ,4 a.
Ice
51
DRAINAGE OUT- \\ ,� o
lel
FALL FOR\\ Im a
IED
RICHEY PROPERTY
\' iU Z
-
50 L i
IWC
�I iW a
49
/ 3�O
zd
13I
Ii
IIY
Y
48 Iml
i y
41
I 42
43
'
10
47 lol
II l�
�/
4c
i
I
I NI
48
Cart
Path
as
I 46 , DAN
b
tyr//
i 45 bi
& AUDREY
RICHEY RES.
I
�
47
June 20, 2000
RICHEY PROPERTY
BUFFERING PLAN
77
46
7j�uJ UP OS 4'
��J�vJ 44
43
42
41
40
AT AG=ff 6
ny
r �-
UoUn h !i
IJ muE
r-�: 16 '1BOOK Jj 9 VALE � Lu
Following the presentation, Director Boling responded to concerns of Commissioners
including the conservation easement, the canal system options, stormwater management,
staff's recommendation for numbering the interior roadways, buffering, and the option for
a road over the canal.
Commissioner Macht recommended the developer be able to name the interior
roadways and wanted the policy to be addressed during the land development regulation
(LDR) amendment process in the near future.
Vice Chairman Ginn agreed that the developer should be able to name the interior
roadways especially since the curving roadways would not fit into the established grid
system. She also was concerned about buffering and wanted to see type "C" buffering or
the equivalent along the entire western border.
Vice Chairman Ginn opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be
heard in this matter.
David Knight, of Knight and McGuire, appeared for the developers. He stated the
applicant agreed with all the staff recommendations except the numbering of interior
roadways and stated the reasons. As to the buffering on the western border, the developer
wishes to intermix the buffering with the golf course design itself.
Vice Chairman Ginn stated she was looking for some additional buffering but thought
that would be okay.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
June 20, 2000
78
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Chairman Adams absent) approved staff's recommendation as
set out in the memorandum except for condition # 1 to allow the
use of street names in the interior roadways of the development,
and that there shall be enhanced buffers on the western border;
and adopted Ordinance No. 2000-018 amending the zoning
ordinance and the accompanying zoning map from RS -1, RS -3,
RM -3 and CG to PD for approximately 446.5 acres of land
generally located north of the North Relief Canal, between
US#1 and the Indian River Lagoon, south of 63rd Street.
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 018
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM RS -
1, RS -3, RM -3, AND CG TO PD FOR APPROXIMATELY 446.5 ACRES OF
LAND GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE NORTH RELIEF CANAL,
BETWEEN US#1 AND THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, SOUTH OF 63RD
STREET; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County and the county land development
regulations, including but not limited to the Planned Development (PD) Process and Standards for
Development chapter, and
June 20, 2000
79
POCK .J rAGE
•
booK h r'AGE 70B
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 018
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the Zoning of the property situated in Indian River County, and legally
described in EXHIBIT A (attached) be changed from RS -1, RS -3, RM -3, AND CG to PD,
residential with accessory commercial, and that the PD conceptual plan (see EXHIBIT B, attached)
will control and regulate development on the subject land.
All with the meaning and intent as set forth in the land development regulations, and the
approved conceptual plan as may be amended pursuant to the provisions of the Planned
Development (PD) Process and Standards for Development chapter of the land development
regulations.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 8th day of
June 2000, for a public hearing to be held on the 20thi day of limp ,
2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht
seconded by Commissioner _ Stanbridge , and adopted by the following vote;
The ordinance was adopted by a vote of :
Chairman Fran B. Adams AhePnt
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Ave
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Ave
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Ave
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 20th day
of _ JunP —12000.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Attest: J.K. Barton, Cler OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By e-
BY.
Deputy Clerk Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman
June 20, 2000
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 018
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M. Keating, AIC
Community Developme t Direc
Caroline D.
lboA r&going instrument was acknowledged before me on this 06-20-00 by FMA
Ginn Ak%W as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, and
PA*ICIA M. RIDG%Xputy Clerk, of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, who are personally known to me
Notary Public
Kimberly E Massung
MY COMMISSION t CC85513i EXPIRES Printed Na
80"DTH"'2005
""� Commission No.: CC855436
Commission Expiration: July 15, 2003
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this � day of ,
2000.
Effective upon filing with the Department of State.
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSALS FOR THE NORTH COUNTY
RECREATION COMPLEX
The Board reviewed a letter of June 14, 2000:
June 20, 2000
81
F �r
ECCE IlJ rAGt d
Francis A Coffev
5045 Fairways Circle #106
Vero Beach FL 32967
7,74-- /9a�
Mr. James Chandler
County Administrator
Dear Mr. Chandler,
June 14, 2000
This is a request to be put on the County Commissioners' agenda for the June
20, 2000 meeting under " Public Discussion Items" to comment on the proposals
for the North County Recreation Complex.
Sincerely,
/ill. C,o�
Francis M. Coffey
Frank Coffey, 5045 Fairways Circle, presented concerns regarding the plans for the
proposed North County Recreation Complex which appears to be evolving into a theme park.
He pointed out the Board approved, about a year prior, using $3.45 million sales tax dollars.
The justification was that the north county desperately needs a recreational complex to house
a community center, meeting rooms, banquet facilities, a swimming pool, multi-purpose
fields for general usage, programmed facilities for gymnastics, dance, and so forth, because
the growth in the north county is demanding these facilities. The Board selected Brad Smith
& Associates to prepare a proposal for consideration. The record was not clear how or when
such changes were suggested.
Mr. Coffey reviewed Brad Smith's proposal and cost estimates of $5.4 million, which
June 20, 2000
82
which included a "lazy river", a baseball complex, a soccer complex, and nature trails. With
general site infrastructure and several other items there was a grand total for the project of
$9.457 million. It was also stated in the estimates that Brad Smith had no control over the
costs of labor, equipment, materials, pricing method, and so on, thus indicating that the costs
above are merely rough estimates. On May 4, 2000, Brad Smith submitted the new project
schedule to the Board. A staff report was rescheduled from the June 13, 2000 meeting to
July 11, for an unspecified reason which Mr. Coffey understood was to give Commissioners
an opportunity to look at a pool in another part of the state. Staff is now recommending a
construction cost of approximately $4.375 million for the pool complex, using the $3.45
million from the sales tax and the difference would be made up from other funding sources.
In addition, it is being proposed not to bid the project but use one source, and he questioned
if that was the best way to proceed.
Finally, Mr. Coffey advised that he had prepared a letter to the Commission listing
a number of questions and issues which he felt needed to be addressed and he urged the
Board to have a special workshop on the matter.
(CLERK'S NOTE: Mr. Coffey then produced copies of his questions which were
distributed to the Commissioners and staff and a copy of which has been placed with the
backup of the meeting in the office of the Clerk to the Board.)
Mr. Coffey proceeded to ask questions concerning the selection of the site location,
guarantees that permits will be issued by other controlling agencies, why changes were made
from the initial concept of the park, how the design criteria was established, whether grant
dollars will be appropriated for such a program, responsibility for maintenance of the
facilities, number of employees, estimated annual maintenance and operating costs,
responsibility for the operation, a fee for usage and estimated annual income, any restricted
June 20, 2000
83
0
BOOK E VAGE 7711
I
DOCK 1-13 rAGE 1
use of the diving pool, liability insurance, and whether $.5 million is obtainable from the lost
revenue fund. He felt the public needed to know the answers to these questions which would
best be taken care of at a workshop meeting.
Vice Chairman Gunn suggested Mr. Coffey contact Administrator Chandler for
direction on where to find the answers to his questions.
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM -PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 11.2000:
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE
DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS
Vice Chairman Ginn made the above announcement. (Clerk's Note: The proposed
ordinance was in the backup for the meeting and available in the office of the Clerk to the
Board for review.)
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
10.A. CONSIDER RESCHEDULING BUDGET WORKSHOP
MEETINGS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 16, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: June 16, 2000
SUBJECT: Pro osed Re -Scheduling of Workshop Meetings
FROM: ames E. Chan er
The proposed FY 2000/2001 budget is scheduled to be released Friday, July 7 and
workshop meetings to begin Wednesday, July 12. Currently, critical staff time has also been and
is continuing to be required for other priority matters, such as health insurance and collective
bargaining, which impact the proposed budget. As a result, the current budget schedule is not
realistic. It is recommended that the Board consider rescheduling the workshop meetings to
begin July 19, with a release date of July 14.
June 20, 2000
84
•
In conjunction with the collective bargaining process which has been formally initiated
with both unions, there is a need for a bargaining strategy meeting with the Board If convenient
for the Board, a short meeting is suggested for anytime during the week of June 26.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Chairman Adams absent) rescheduled the budget workshop
meetings to begin July 19, 2000, and release date for budget
packets on July 14, 2000, as recommended.
10A SCHEDULE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY
MEETING (IAFF AND TEAMSTERS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 16, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: June 16, 2000
SUBJECT: Pro osed Re -Scheduling of Workshop Meetings
FROM: ames E. Chan3ler
The proposed FY 2000/2001 budget is scheduled to be released Friday, July 7 and
workshop meetings to begin Wednesday, July 12. Currently, critical staff time has also been and
is continuing to be required for other priority matters, such as health insurance and collective
bargaining, which impact the proposed budget. As a result, the current budget schedule is not
realistic. It is recommended that the Board consider rescheduling the workshop meetings to
begin July 19, with a release date of July 14.
In conjunction with the collective bargaining process which has been formally initiated
with both unions, there is a need for a bargaining strategy meeting with the Board. If convenient
for the Board, a short meeting is suggested for anytime during the week of June 26.
Following a brief discussion of their schedules, the Commissioners decided to hold
the meeting at 9 a.m. on June 29, 2000.
June 20, 2000
85
BOOK �J ') "AVE 9`�^:
•
BOCK hJ r'dGE 7 it
I LB. REQUEST TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE -
APPLICATION FORA CLASS E CERTIFICATE FROM WE CARE OF
THE TREASURE COAST TO PROVIDE NON -EMERGENCY BAKER
ACT INTERFACILITY AMBULATORY TRANSPORTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 9, 2000:
TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler. Countv Administrator
FROM: Douglas M. Wright, Dirctor
Emergency Services
DATE: June 9. 2000
SUBJECT: Request to set a Public Hearing date regarding an Application for a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity for a Class E Certificate from We Care of the
Treasure Coast to Provide Non -Emergency Baker Act Interfacility Ambulatory
Transports
It is respectfully requested that the Board of County Commissioners schedule a public hearing for
July 11, 2000 pursuant to Chapter 304 of the Indian River County Code. for the purpose of
considering the application of We Care of the Treasure Coast to provide non -emergency Baker Act
interfacility ambulatory transports originating from Indian River County and terminating out of
county.
An application for a Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide non-
emergency Baker Act interfacility ambulatory medical transport services was received from We Care
of the Treasure Coast on May 9', 2000. We Care of the Treasure Coast is requesting this certificate
to allow their units to transport Baker Act clients/patients from Indian River County facilities and
transport to out of county facilities. This would be for ambulatory patients only.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests the Board approve July 11. 2000 as the date to consider the application for a Class E
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity filed by We Care of the Treasure Coast to provide
Baker Act transports.
June 20, 2000
86
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Chairman Adams absent) approved July 11, 2000 as the date to
consider the application for a Class E Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity filed by We Care of the Treasure
Coast to provide non -emergency Baker Act interfacility
ambulatory transports, as recommended in the memorandum.
11.C.1. AWARD BID #2046 AND APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT
FOR INSTALLATION OF PRECONDITIONING UNIT FOR HEALTH
DEPARTMENT (IRVINE MECHANICAL, INC.)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 12, 2000:
DATE. June 12, 2000
TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU James E Chandler. County Administrator
Thomas Frame. General Services Director _ Icj
� v
FROM Fran Powell. Purchasing Manager
; 611u'--
A Fi
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
Advertisement Mailed to.
Specifications Purchased by
Replies:
BID TABULATION:
June 7, 2000 at 2:00 P.M.
May 12 & 19, 2000
Thirty (30) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
One (1) Vendor
VENDOR: BID PRICE:
Wine Mechanical, Inc. $88,269.00
Orlando. Florida
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF B11D
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMMENDATION:
$100,000.00
$88,269.00
Buildings & Grounds Air Conditioning
001-220-519-041-23
1
rdU r�, �)
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Imne Mechanical. Inc. of Orlando. Florida as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
In addition, staff requests authorization for the Chairman to sign the agreement after it has been executed by
the Contractor with all the required insurance and bonds and upon review and approval as to form by the
Count• Attornev A sample Agreement is attached for review.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) awarded Bid #2046 to Irvine Mechanical, Inc. of
Orlando, Florida, and authorized the Chairman to sign the
agreement after it has been executed by the Contractor with all
the required insurance and bonds and upon review and approval
as to form by the County Attorney, as recommended in the
memorandum.
June 20, 2000
AGREEM'NT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
88
11.C.2. INTERNET PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT
DEMANDSTAR.COM, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13,,2000:
Date: June 13, 2000
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator ))
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director /Lr,,4 CtJ
Subject: Internet Procurement Agreement with DemandStar.com, Inc.
EXHIBIT: Proposed Agreement between DemandStar.com, Inc. and Indian River County
BACKGROUND:
DemandStar.com. Inc. (formerly known as IOD — Information On Demand) is a Florida corporation that
provides a multi -faceted approach to automating the procurement process. As such, the company uses a
combination of technologies including fax -on -demand, fax broadcasting, and the Internet to manage
vendor and bid information.
The basic concept to this interactive procurement process is that the agency (county) enters into an
agreement to use the services of DemandStar.com at no cost to the agency. Any time the agency needs to
bid a purchase, obtain written quotes, issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) or issue a Request for
Qualifications (RFQ), DemandStar.com will provide this information to a database of qualified vendors.
DemandStar.com charges each vendor $30.00 per year for fax or e-mail notifications. For a fee of
$100.00 per year, the vendor can be placed on a vendor list for the entire state or nationwide for $750.00 a
year.
Currently, when Indian River County goes out for a bid, RFP or RFQ, an advertisement is placed in the
newspaper and notices are sent by Purchasing to a list of vendors who may be typically registered with
the Purchasing Division and are maintained on a vendor list.
With DemandStar.com, when the agency prepares a request it would still run the required advertisement,
but instead of sending out numerous invitations or requests to the vendors on the agency's list, the agency
would send the request to DemandStar.com. DemandStar.com then would notify all the vendors who
have subscribed to their service via fax or e-mail. The list of vendors would be regional at minimum
rather than just the listed number of vendors that agency has maintained. Plus, any vendors who have
subscribed as statewide and nationwide would be notified. As can be seen, the pool of potential vendors
will have greatly increased providing for a higher probability of more competitive bids and more
consultants from which to choose.
Another benefit to the agency is that hard copies of various documents that the agency will generate will
be able to be downloaded from the Internet or may be faxed to the vendors. The documents are sent via
DemandStar.com without the agency having to pay the cost of reproduction, mail or pay the cost of
postage. Presently, if a vendor is interested in bidding on a project, it will have the capacity to review the
plans and construction documents on line and actually downloads the items if so desired. Currently, the
agency would have to provide copies. While the agency may charge and recoup some costs, it still cost
for the time involved with the work. Many times plans are available through the consultant at the cost of
copying plus a multiplier. All these cost are either reduced or eliminated saving time and money for both
the vendor and agency.
June 20, 2000
89
BOOK f1 r�1i;E cl I
BOOK.. rAuE t�
As pan of the service to the agency at no cost is the creation of a web page that can be linked to the
agency home page. The aeency's procurement page would list all current invitations for bids. requests for
proposals and requests for qualifications and their status. Any vendor or member of the public may read
the advertisement for services on the web page. The registered vendor may download the document at no
cost through the web page of DemandStar.com at any tune 24 hours a day
Currently. there are over fifty agencies that subscribe to the procurement services of DemandStar.com. I
personally called and talked to several ageneses here in Florida. Everyone was very satisfied with the
service they .were receiving. This approach to expanded procurement services through the use of
technology will save time and money and increase the pool of qualified vendors benefiting the county and
its taxpayers. It will also make participation in the process by the vendors more user-friendly for the
vendor.
Attached is a copy of an agenda item from St. Johns County showing where the county sought proposals
from firms providing the automated procurement service. Subsequently they accepted the proposal from
Information On Demand (now Demandstar.com). Also attached is the proposed agreement that would
provide a year's service by DemandStar.com Inc. at no cost to Indian River County.
RECOMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the agreement between Indian River County and
DemandStar.com, Inc.. as a piggy back to the St. Johns County RFP 99-93 for automated procurement
services and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement after it has been executed by
DemandStar.com Inc.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Stanbridge, to approve staff's
recommendation.
Commissioner Macht spoke in favor of the motion because the agreement will save
the County money and reach a wider range of vendors.
General Services Director Thomas W. Frame addressed concerns about the County's
original vendors and explained how they would not be left behind through the use of this
new process. He further advised of the registration fees which he felt were nominal. He
advised the program is already in use in Seminole County and explained how they have been
using it.
Acting County Attorney O'Brien addressed concerns about Sunshine Law and the
indemnification clause in the contract.
June 20, 2000
0 0
Director Frame further addressed concerns for vendors who are not up to speed on the
Internet and explained that the procedure would be phased in.
Vice Chairman Ginn indicated her willingness to give it a try for the one-year
contract.
Commissioner Macht specified that DemandStar has agreed to notify our local
vendors.
Purchasing Division Manager Fran Boynton -Powell explained the process further
from the .perspective of her procedures.
THE CALLED THE QUESTION
and the motion carried unanimously (4-0,
Chairman Adams absent) . (Agreement with
DemandStar.com, Inc. as a piggy back to the St.
Johns County RFP 99-93 for automated
procurement services approved and the Chairman
was authorized to execute same after it has been
executed by DemandStar.com, Inc.)
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN TAE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.C.3. NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY ADDITION - REVISED
AGREEMENT WITH EDLUND & DRITENBAS ARCHITECTS FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 5, 2000:
June 20, 2000
91
sm i1j f -AGE T
sou hi PAGE
Date: June 5.2000
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator yy II
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director �tkurc�
Subject: Revised Agreement with Edlund & Dritenbas Architects, P.A. for Design and
Constructions Services for an Addition to the North County Library located
in Sebastian on C.R. 512
EXHIBIT: Revised Negotiated Architectural Agreement
BACKGROUND:
In January of this year. the Board approved an agreement with the architectural firm of Edlund. Dritenbas
for the design of the remodeling and expansion of the North County Library. That agreement was for a
project that had an estimated construction cost of $789,921.00. Based on program planning and
schematic design, the project changed significantly in cost estimates based on needs identified.
On May 23. the Board accepted staffs recommendation to proceed basically with a plan that included an
expansion to the meeting room. an expanded reading room. major site work and several building upgrades
bringing the project to a total project cost of $1,674,397.00 and an estimated construction cost of
$1.354.232.00. Based on the revised cost projections. The architectural firm has revised the fee structure
accordingly In addition. the total architectural fees are a lump sum including civil engineering that had
been a separate item in the existing agreement.
The only cost for which the County (owner) is responsible is for the application and permitting fees and
the geotechnical services.
The new fee is $137.676. which is 8.9% of construction budget ($1.354.236) plus the cost of the civil
engineering fee of $17. 149
For the Board's convenience. the entire revised contract is included. but the only changes are those pages
initialed by Paul Dritenbas dated 24 May 2000 (pages 1-1, 1-2, 1-11.2-11). The changes are enumerated
as follows:
• Page 1-1 This merely an initial for the entire document since it contains revisions.
• Page 1-2 This revises Section 1.1.2.5 providing for a revised construction budget.
• Page 1-11 This revises Section 1.5.1 providing for a revised compensation fee
• Page 2-11 This revises Section 2.8.3 providing for a revised schedule of services.
RECONIENDATION:
Staff submits that the proposed revised architectural agreement with Edlund & Dntenbas. P A. is fair and
reasonable and recommends Board approval. and that the Chairman be authorized to initial and date the
four revised pages (pages 1-1. 1-2. 1-11,2-11).
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Tippet, to approve stars recommendation.
June 20, 2000
92
I
Commissioner Stanbridge and Vice Chairman Ginn had some questions for
clarification, and General Services Director Thomas W. Frame responded to their questions
concerning the additional costs for civil engineering services.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (4-0, Chairman Adams absent)
(Chairman authorized to initial and date the four revised pages:
1-1, 1-2,1-11, 2-11)
COPY OF REVISED/RZTL41ED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.F. RFP #2044 - EMPLOYEE HEALTH, LIFE. AND LONG-
TERM
ONGTERM DISABILITY INSURANCE - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF
FLORIDA (MODIFIED PLAN). BRADMAN/UNIPSYCH,
ARMS/LINCOLN RE (STOP LOSS) MODIFIED BCBS PLAN,
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE (LIFE), AND UNUM INSURANCE
COMPANY (LONGTERM DISABILITY
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 14, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
THRU: Joe Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Ann Rankin -PR -
Benefits/Payroll Administrator
DATE: June 14, 2000
SUBJECT: Insurance RFP #2044
Staff requests consideration of the following information at the June 20, 2000, regular meeting of
the Board of County Commissioners.
Background
The Board approved utilizing Interisk Corporation as the consultant to assist the County in
evaluating proposals for its Health Benefit Plan Claims Administration & Utilization Review
Services, Mental Health Benefits, Excess/Stop-Loss Insurance for Group Self -Insured Medical
Benefits, Prescription Benefits Plan, Group Life Insurance and Accidental Death & Dismemberment,
Group Employee Voluntary Supplemental Life Insurance, and Voluntary Long Term Disability.
June 20, 2000
93
BOOK
•
EUCS LJ rAGE 7C -
In April 2000, Interisk Corporation prepared and distributed a Request for Proposal (RFP) to all
interested prospective proposers for the purpose ofsoliciting competitive proposals for Indian River
County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners and affiliated constitutional offices. Several
organizations submitted multiple proposals. The proposals were reviewed by Interisk for
completeness and responsiveness to the RFP requirements and have been analyzed in relation to the
lowest overall cost, while maintaining an adequate level of benefits.
Attached is Interisk's Analysis and Recommendation for the Board to review. Interisk's
recommendation is based on the following:
— Lowest overall annual cost
— Substantial provider network accessibility
— Aggressive preferred provider discount arrangements
Recommendation
The Board of County Commissioners award the bids as follows:
Health Insurance
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida - Health Benefit Plan Claims Administration
Modified Plan Utilization Review Services
Prescription Benefits Plan
Bradman/UniPsych - Mental Health Benefits
Recommendation - Cont.
ARMS/Lincoln Re - Excess/Stop-Loss Insurance for Group Self -Insured
Modified BCBS Plan Medical Benefits
Life Insurance
HighMark Life Insurance - Group Life Insurance and Accidental Death &
Lon Bryan Dismemberment
Group Employee Voluntary Supplemental Life Insurance
Voluntary Lone Term Disabilitv
UNUM Insurance Company - Voluntary Long Term Disability
The Consultant reviewed employee dependent contribution and is recommending an increase as
will be presented at the meeting. This will be addressed further at the appropriate time in
conjunction with bargaining.
June 20, 2000
94
is 0
(CLERK'S NOTE: There was no presentation or discussion.)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) awarded RFP #2044 as set forth in the
memorandum and as recommended by staff in the same.
11.G.1. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 5TH STREET SW
(BETWEEN 43RD AND 58TH AVENUE) STREET PAVING
IMPROVEMENTS - CHARLES R. SEXTON, JR.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler. County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director
AND
Christopher J. Kafer. Jr., P.E., County Enginee
FROM: Ronald L. Callahan, SRA, Right -of -Way Ag t �f L e -
SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition
5`h Street SW between 43' and 58' Avenues
Street Paving Improvements
Charles R. Sexton. Jr.
DATE: June 13, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
An additional 60 feet (60') of right-of-way is needed along the north side of 5' Street SW
between 43' and 58' Avenues to accommodate a road improvement (paving) project. The owner
has executed a contract at a negotiated price of $18,000 per acre for this RS -3 zoned land. This
price per acre is comparable to other similar RS -3 zoned parcels the County has purchased based
upon appraisals or evaluations.
June 20, 2000
95
BOOK v r't�GE itJ
I
SOCK S �AU"E �jU/:z
The contract price for the land is $16,236.00 based upon a total of 0.902 acres. There are no
appraisal or attorneys fees. There are other terms and conditions in the contract as specified in the
addendum by clauses (a) through (1). Additional compensation items (a) through (d) total
$14,625.00.
Total Contract Price
Contract Price for the Land = $16,236.00
Additional Compensation = $14,625.00
Total Contract Price = $30,861.00
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
None.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the S30,861.00 purchase
and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Contract with Addendum
2. Legal Description
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Chairman Adams absent) approved the $30,861.00 purchase
from Charles R. Sexton, Jr. and authorized the Chairman to
execute the contract, as recommended in the memorandum.
COPY OF CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF TEE CLERK TO TEE BOARD
11.G.2. KINGS HIGHWAY (58TH AVENUE) PHASE I -
DICKERSON FLORIDA, INC. - CHANGE ORDER NO.5 AND FINAL
RELEASE OF RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13,,2000:
June 20, 2000
M.
0
TO: James E. Chandler.
County Administrator
THROUGH:
James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
FROM:
Terry B. Thompson, P.E.,
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT:
Kings Highway Phase I
Change Order No. 5 and Final Release of Retainage
DATE:
June 13, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Construction of referenced project is complete. The attached Change Order No. 5 adjusts
quantities to the actual in place completed quantities. The total increases on this change order
are $264,888.27 and deducts are ($310.480.53), for a net reduction of ($45,592.25).
Dickerson Florida, Inc. is requesting final payment and release of retainage in the amount of
$450,293.53. A partial release of retainage was approved on December 7, 1999 when
construction was substantially complete. A 5% remainder was held back until as -built drawings
were completed.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of the attached Change Order No. 5. This change order reduces the
contract amount by ($45,592.25) fora new contract amount of $6.145.232.28. The final contract
amount is 2.8% higher than the original contract amount and 0.8% lower than the second bidder
on this project.
Staff also recommends Final Release of Retainage in the amount of $450,293.53. Funding is
from Account 101-158-541-067.31.
ATTACHMENT
Change Order No. 5
Final Payment Application
June 20, 2000
97
•
BOOK Ili rA6E 6��;;
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) approved Change Order No. 5 and Final Release
of Retainage to be paid to Dickerson Florida, Inc., as
recommended in the memorandum.
COPIES OF CHANGE ORDER & FINAL RELEASE ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.1. SEBASTIAN CHARTER JUNIOR HIGH, INC. -
DEVELOPER' S AGREEMENT FOR WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION
AT CHESSER GAP CHARTER SCHOOL IN SEBASTIAN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 13, 2000:
DATE: JUNE 13. 2000
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTII IT)L:
PREPARED STEVEN J. DOYLE. P.E. N
4
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGERI
BY:
SUBJECT: DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT F R CHESSER GAP CHARTER SCHOOL
SEBASTIAN. FL.
WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION
BACKGROUND
Chesser Gap Charter School is a proposed 8,247 square foot institutional development located at the
southwest tor= of Wave Street and Fleming Street in Sebastian. A 12 mch waterlme is proposed along
Fleming Street to serve current residue and provide a water distribution system loop. The water main shall be
constructed along the south side of Fleming Street, thence south along the east side of Wave Street and then
c m wrt to an existing water main along George Street The new property owners, Sebastian Charter Junior
High Inc., bas agreed to carter into a cost sharing aweement with the County to construct the proposed water
main in conjunction with their site development.
Attached is a proposed developer's agreement with Sebastian Charter Junior High, Inc. for reimbursement
of a portion of the subject wafer main.
June 20, 2000
98
ANALYSIS
As shown m Exhibit B of the attached Agreeanera, the estanated cost sharW between the Developer and the
County is as follows:
Deoription
Water Distribution Svstmn
Devdow*s Share 1'
$2.778.75
County s Share
$64.421.00
Taal Pmiect Cost
I $67.199.75
t-) L mopers some is nesse upon applicable lig exteosiom
cage of S112 -VA for watwpu mmm to Reolutien 99-58.
The Developer will pay $16.046.75 in addition to the above Developer's share. in water capacittcharges.
seer capes' urges and conn=on fees. Construction of the water main will allow the Coumy to coordinate
expansion of the water distabution systmn with developmsite and of the sand adjacent properties. The Court's
share will be funded from capaah, charges fee fund.
RECOMIVVIENDATION
The staff of the Departnhent of Utility Services rids that the Board of Coumv Commissioners
approve the attached Developer's agreerrhent as preserved, and authorizes the Chairman to execute the same.
ACCOUNT NO: 472-000-169-370.00 NAME: Utility Capacity Charge Fund AMOUNT. W.421.00
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) approved the Developer's Agreement with
Sebastian Charter Junior High, Inc. for water main construction
for proposed Chesser Gap Charter School and authorized the
Chairman to execute the same, as recommended in the
memorandum.
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.2. SU -BENE MOBILE HOME PARK - DOMESTIC
WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT BY IRENE DONATELLI
AS OWNER
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 6, 2000:
June 20, 2000
BOOK r'1;E tiU
•
BOOK I L'.i r'A'Ut U
Z DOD
DATE: JUNE 6.4999 -
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF LrnLITY SE
PREPARED STEVEN J. DOYLE. P.E.
AND STAFFED BY: CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
SUBJECT: DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESID AL AGREEMENT
SU -RENS MOBIL HOME PARK - WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
BACKGROUND
The Owners of the Su -Rene Mobil Home Park located in the vicinity of 8`h Street and Old Dixie in Indian
River County, Florida desire to utilize the Indian River County Residuals Management Facility to dispose of
residuals from the Facility's Wastewater Treatment Facility (Package Plant).
ANALYSIS
The COUNTY operates and mai tams a publicly owned Residuals Management Facility (Dewatering Facility),
Permit #FLA -010434-00 1, which is capable of treating its own residual and accepting domestic � re
sidual
from outside sources. The facility has been giver approval and is operating under Florida Department of
F mmu mental Protection (FDEP) permit in compliance with Florida Administrative Code (FAC), Chapter 62-640,
to properly treat and dispose of the residuals into a Class 1 Lined Landfill.
The Su -Rene Mobil Home Park shall rnaintam compliance with the permit conditions issued by the FDEP and
the specific conditions of the Indian River County Department of Utility Services for acceptance of residuals to the
IRC Residuals Managerrent Facility. Upon arrival onsite for tteatnent of residuals from the CUSTOMER'S plant
the COUNTY has the right to refuse veamicat of said residuals, if it is denonstated that the chemicaUphysical
Propenes of the tansported material is not consistent for dewatering.
The CUSTOMER will provide all transportation of residuals. and will be charged the prevailing Utility
rates as shown on the Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates. Fees and Charges attached to the Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Departnemt of Utility Services rids that the Board of County Commissioners approve
the attached Domestic Wastewater Residual Agn=nent as pry. and authorizes the Chairman to execute the
same.
June 20, 2000
100
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) approved the Domestic Wastewater Residual
Agreement with Irene Donatelli, as owner of Su -Rene Mobile
Home Park and authorized the Chairman to execute the same, as
recommended in the memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
1 LHA AOUARINA DEVELOPMENT (MELBOURNE BEACH
DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT WITH JOHN
BATES FOR SERVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 31, 2000:
2060
DATE: MAY 31.-Wjg&
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
FROM:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DONALD R. HUBBS. P.E./
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY
PREPARED
STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E.
AND STAFFED BY:
CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAG ,�
SUBJECT:
DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT
AOUARINA - WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACRXIT
BACKGROUND
The Owners of the Aauarina located in Melbourne Beach. Florida desire to utilize the Indian
River County Residuals Management Facility to dispose of residuals from the Facility's Wastewater
Treatment Facility (Package Phurt).
ANALYSIS
The COUNTY operates and maintaiac a publicly owned Residuals Management Facility (Dewatering F=htv),
Permit #FLA -010434-001, which is capable of treating its own residual and accepting domestic wastewater residual
6 outside sources. The facility has been given approval and is operating under Florida Departarent of
Eavimnmeatal Protection (FDEP) permit in compliance with Florida Administrative Code (FAC), Chapter 62-040,
to properly treat and dispose of the residuals into a Class 1 Lined Landfill.
June 20, 2000
101
BOOK Lj r'AGE ��
J
B00� J "4E d
The Aaaarima Development shall maimaim compliance with the permit conditions issued by the FDEP and the
specific conditions of the Indian River County Departmemt of Utility Services for acceptance of residuals to the IRC
Residuals Manageneot Facility. Upon arrival onsite for treatment of residuals from the CUSTOMER'S plate the
COUNTY has the right to refuse treatinaut of said residuals. if it is demonstrated that the chemical/ph.mcal
properties of the transported material is not consistent for dewatering.
The CUSTOMER will provide all transportation of residuals, and will be charged the prevailing Utility
rates as shown on the Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates, Fees and Charges attached to the Agreement.
RECONIlVIENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
the attached Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement as presented. and authorizes the Chairman to execute the
same.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) approved the Aquarina Development (Melbourne
Beach) Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement with John
Bates for Service Management Systems, Inc. and authorized the
Chairman to execute the same, as recommended in the
memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
INT THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
I LHA THE SUNTREE PARTNERS (CITRUS SPRINGS)
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF OFF-SITE
UTILITIES (MASTER PLANNED WATER MAIN AND FORCE MAIN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 6, 2000:
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER DATE: JUNE 6. 2000
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
June 20, 2000
9
102
FROM:
DONALD R HUBBS. P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SE>ES�
PREPARED
STEVEN J. DOYLE. P.E. v
AND STAFFED
CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER ,
BY.
I
SUBJECT:
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR CITRUS $?RINGS DEVELOPMENT
MASTER PLANNED WATER MAIN & FORQE MAIN CONSTRUCTION
June 20, 2000
9
102
•
BACKGROUND
Citrus Springs is a proposed development located near the northeast comer of 584' Ave. and 5* Street
SW. Refer to Exhibit -A. A 16 -inch Master Plan Water Main is scheduled for construction along the
Developer's property. The 16 -inch Master Plan water main is slated for construction on an "as -needed" basis
driven by development. The proposed 6-mch force main provides an extension of the wastewater collection
system to serve the proposed development, surrounding residentmL future development and has the ability to
loop the County's South Regional and West Regional Wastewater Collection Systems. The County's
Wastewater Collection System is comprised of five independent regional service areas (North, South,
Central, West Regional and Sea Oaks WWTFs) which geographically make up the Countywide Wastewater
Collection Systems.
Extending a force main along 5d' SW from a force main on 58'h Ave. to a force main on 43`d Ave. would
hydraulically interconnect the County's South and West Regional Service Areas. Just as looping of water
mains in a distribution system. the effects of looping a force main provides a similar level of redundancy and
hydraulic balancing of flows. The 6 -inch force extension / looping has the ability to divert a portion of the
sewage flow to either the West Regional or South Regional Wastewater Collection Systems for Tn atrnent
and Disposal. Until this opportunity, each of the regional wastewater collection areas had not expanded
sufficiently to allow for the interconnection of the regional collection areas.
The Sun Tree Partners Inc. have agreed to enter into a cost sharing agreement with the County to
construct the Coumv Master Plan Water Main and the proposed Force Main Extension / Looping System in
conjunction with their site development.
Attached is a proposed Developer's Agreement with Sun Tree Partners Inc. for reimbursement of a
portion of the subject waterlines and wastewater lines (Refer to Exhibit -B). A description of the proposed
Master Plan line and Force Main Looping System is presented below and discussed in further detail in the
Developers Agreement.
A COUNTY MASTER PLAN 16 -inch Water Main along 5`� Street SW from 58' Ave. to 43`d Ave.:
Furnish and install a 16 -inch water main along 5' Street SW from Icings Highway (584i Ave.)
east to 43r4 Avenue. Make connection to an existing 16 -inch water line located on 43rd Avenue.
The proposed 16 -inch water main shall extend approximately 5,453 +/- lineal feet.
B FORCE MAIN EXTENSION/LOOP — 6 -inch Force Main along 5`h Street SW from 58`h Ave to
43`° Ave.:
Furnish and install a 6 -inch force main along 5d' Street SW from Icings Highway (581, Ave.) east
to 43r4 Avenue. Make connection to a future 6 -inch force main to be located on 43' Avenue.
The proposed 6 -inch force main for this DEVELOPMENT shall extend approximately 5,453 +/-
lineal feet to 43rd Ave.
The DEVELOPER shall make connection to a proposed 6 -inch force main to be constructed
along 43'd Ave. by another Developer known as Arbor Trace. Refer to Exbibit-D.
Staff is currently negotiating with the owners of Arbor Trace to over -size their required force
main along 43'd Ave. to handle the projected sewage flows from the proposed Citrus Springs
Development as well as the surrounding community. Staff will be bringing a proposed Arbor
Trace Developer's Agreement to the Board in the near future.
ANALYSIS
As shown in Exhibit C-1 of the attached agreement. the estimated cost sharing between the Developer
and the County for a 16 -inch County Master Plan Water Main along 5" Street SW from 58`b Ave. to 43"' Ave.
is presented in the Agreement and summarized below:
As shown in F.zhibit C -Z of the attached agreement, the estimated cost sharing between the Developer
and the Countv for an 6 -inch County Force Main Extension / Loop along 5`h St. SW from the 58`h Ave to 43rd
Ave. is presented in the Agreement and summarized below:
June 20, 2000
103
BOOK iv_ -L
C,
DOCK M CAGE, �
Description
Developer's Share •
County's Share
I Total
C -1 -16 -inch Water Main
$61,346.25
5488.654.00
I $550.000.25
C-2 — 6 -inch Force Main
58`b Ave. to 43RD. Ave.
$85,994.00
$105,506.00
$191,500.00
Total Cost
$147,340.25
$594.160.00
I $741500.25
(•) Developer's share is based upon applicable line e.Xtension charges at a minimum of $11.25/1 for water and $15.77/ft.
for sewer pursuant In Resolution 99-58.
Construction of the water main and force main will allow the County to coordinate expansion of the
water distribution and wastewater collection system with development of the site and adjacent properties.
The County's share will be funded from the capacity charge fee fund. (See below for account munber. )
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Developers agreement as presented. and authorize the Chairman to execute the same.
ACCOUNT NO: 472-000-169-370.00 NAME: Utility Capacity Charge Fund AMOUNT: $594,160.00
SJD/sjd
Attachments
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) approved the Developer's Agreement with The
Suntree Partners for construction of off-site utilities for the
Citrus Springs Development master planned water main and
force main construction and authorized the Chairman to execute
the same, as recommended in the memorandum.
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN TIM OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
11.11.5. SOUTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WELL SYSTEM REHABILITATION
- CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE. INC.- ENGINEERING SERVICES
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 13
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 12, 2000:
June 20, 2000
104
•
DATE: JUNE 12, 2000
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. '\ 4
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVI
PREPARED GENE A. RAUTH
AND STAFFED OPERATIONS MANAGER
BY:
SUBJECT: SOUTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WELL SYSTEM
REHABILITATION
BACKGROUND
The South County Water Treatment Plant has been producing potable water for
approximately 18 years. Raw water is supplied by six wells constructed into the
Floridan Aquifer. Wells 1 through 3 were the initial wells constructed with the
plant and Wells 4 through 6 were installed at a later plant expansion.
Potential problems with the wells were identified and monitored by County
operations staff. Semiannual cartridge filter replacement activity was normal
operating procedure; however, the replacement frequency was becoming
greater. At its peak, cartridge filter elements were replaced weekly to avoid any
damage to the reverse osmosis membrane units. Each filter change costs
approximately $2,000.
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., (CDM) the County's continuing consultant for
water treatment and distribution facilities was contacted and aided in
troubleshooting the problem and suggested laboratory analysis of the material
accumulating in the filter. It was determined through a review of past plant
records that a well rehabilitation program had not been implemented. Well
rehabilitation is necessary to preserve the physical and mechanical operating
conditions of the well. Laboratory analysis and isolation of wells have been
completed to prioritize well rehabilitation efforts. Based on this information,
CDM formulated a work plan for well rehabilitation, and identified necessary
improvements as part of the previous work authorization, which was approved
by the Board of County Commissioners on May 2, 2000.
ANALYSIS
County staff requested, received and reviewed CDM's well system rehabilitation
work plan. CDM's work authorization will enable staff to rehabilitate the six (6)
wells at the facility one by one with no disruption of service to the Utility. CDM
will be responsible for coordination, review and oversight of the various
phases/tasks of the licensed well contractor (subcontractor to CDM) for these
services to ensure proper rehabilitation efforts. Additionally, CDM will evaluate
emergency generator/well system alternatives to provide further operations
flexibility in the event of power outage.
June 20, 2000
105
•
I
600K hJ SAGE 7 u�31 /
Contingency services are included to facilitate pump and motor repairs, flow
meter improvements/ calibration, etc. as may be necessary while the well(s) are
out of service. These services will be authorized only as necessary by Utilities
staff, in writing.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners accept and approve the attached work authorization,
(Exhibit A), for engineering services for well system rehabilitation at South
County Water Treatment Plant to CDM, for the upper limit amount of $181,800.
Staff also recommends provisions for an upper limit amount of $25,000 on a
contingency basis for additional services, if necessary, upon formal written
approval by Utilities Staff.
Funding will come from 471-000-169-391.00.
DRH `jhd
Attachments (1 — Exhibit A)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Chairman
Adams absent) accepted and approved work authorization No.
13 with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., for engineering services
for well system rehabilitation at South County Water Treatment
Plant for the upper limit amount of $181,800, and approved
provisions for an upper limit amount of $25,000 on a
contingency basis for additional services, if necessary, upon
formal written approval by Utilities' staff, as recommended in
the memorandum.
June 20, 2000
WORK AUTHORIZATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
106
B.C. COMMISSIONER MACHT - REPLACEMENT BOAT
RAMPS ON WESTERN SHORE OF INDIAN RIVER LAGOON (OSLO
ROAD & HARMONY OAKS SITES)
Commissioner Macht stated that he would like the Board to direct staff to investigate
and report on the possibility of construction of boat ramps at the western edge of the Indian
River Lagoon at the Oslo Road and Harmony Oaks (near the southern border) sites. He
pointed out that ramps at either or both of these locations would save boat towing traffic over
to the barrier island, cut down congestion and gasoline consumption, and allow the county's
boaters to have quicker access to the ocean via the Ft. Pierce Inlet. He understood there are
permitting difficulties but thought the Board should try doing it.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Chairman Adams absent) directed staff to look at both sites as
per Commissioner Macht's suggestion.
M.A. EMERGENCY_ SERVICES DISTRICT
None. 1
U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are
being prepared separately.
U.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
June 20, 2000
107
BOOK r r'A'E d
BOOK Iij rAGE {
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 11:03 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved Q®O 6
June 20, 2000
108
Fran B. Adams, Chairman