The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7/11/2000MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA TUESDAY, JULY 11, 2000 - 9:00 A.M. County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Fran B. Adams, Chairman (District 1) Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman (District 5) Kenneth R. Macht (District 3) Ruth M. Stanbridge (District 2) John W. Tippin (District 4) James E. Chandler, County Administrator Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP PAGES 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. John W. Tippin 4. ADDMONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS i. Delete Item 9.A.8., Beuttell Development and Kirk Koehler, Trustee, request to amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±195.7 acres from AG -1 to L-1 and to expand the Urban Service Area to include those ±195.7 acres. 5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF AIMUTES Regular Meeting of June 13, 2000 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board: 1) Delta Farms Water Control District Budget for FY 2000-01 BK 1 14 PG 00 1 7. CONSENT AGENDA kont'd.l: BACKUP A. (cont'd.) PAGES 2) City of Sebastian Notice of Public Hearing on July 6, 2000 at 7: 00 p.m. re: Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Municipal Canoe Launch on 1.91 Acre Site Located on the West Side of the Sebastian River B. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated June 15, 2000) 1-9 C. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated June 22, 2000) 10-23 D. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated June 29, 2000) 24-32 E. Accept Resignation of Rev. F.H. Reardon from the Homeless Task Force (letter dated June 27, 2000) 33 F. Appointment by Comm. Macht of George H. Haygood to the Treasure Coast Economic Development District 34-35 G. Senior Management Class Designation (memorandum dated June 21, 2000) 36-37 H. Edward Byrne Memorial State Grant and National Criminal History Improvement Program for Circuit Court — Certificate of Acceptance (memorandum dated July 3, 2000) 38-50 I. Submission of Derelict Vessel Removal Program Grant Application (memorandum dated July 5, 2000) 51-60 J. Approval of Sub -Lease Agreement between BellSouth Mobility and Crown Castle International (memorandum dated June 23, 2000) 61-63 K. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 016 (memorandum dated July 5, 2000) 64-65 L. Temporary Water Service Agreement — Indian River County and Grace United Methodist Church, Wabasso, Florida (memorandum dated May 23, 2000) 66-73 BK 1 14 PG 002 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): BACKUP M. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Indian River County PAGES and C. Patrick Flood, III and Brooke H. Flood (memorandum dated June 16, 2000) 74-82 N. Resolution Authorizing County Administrator to Sign Assumption Agreements for Board (memorandum dated June 22, 2000) 83-84 O. Master Street Lighting Agreement with FPL (memorandum dated June 26, 2000) 85-89 P. Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Application by Coalition for the Homeless of Indian River County, Inc. (memorandum dated June 30, 2000) 90-95 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Sheriff Gary C. Wheeler: Budget Adjustment, Out -of -County Inmate Revenue (letter dated June 19, 2000) 96-99 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC BEARINGS 1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING SECTION 210.04, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR LOCAL COLLECTION, ADMINISTRATION, AND AUDIT OF THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX; PRO- VIDING FOR REMITTANCE OF THE TAX TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION AND EN- FORCEMENT BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING FOR AUDITING BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING ENFORCE- MENT POWERS; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFEC- TIVE DATE (memorandum dated June 23, 2000) 100-107 BK 114 PG 003 r BACKUP 9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): PAGES A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.): 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS Ordinance Prohibiting Discharge of Firearms across Unpaved Roads (memorandum dated June 21, 2000) 108-111 3. Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from We Care of the Treasure Coast, Inc. to Provide Non -Emergency Baker Act Interfacility Transport Services (memorandum dated June 28, 2000) 112-141 4. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ±249 FEET SOUTH OF CR 512 AND ±235 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM C/I TO L-1; AND BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CR 512,±300 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM L-1 TO C/I; AND PROVIDING SEVER- ABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE Paradise Partners, Inc. Request to Amend the Compre- hensive Plan to Redesignate 10.63 Acres from C/I to L-1, and to Rezone those ±0.63 Acres from CG to A-1; and to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±0.63 Acres from L-1 to C/I, and to Rezone those ±0.63 Acres from A-1 to CG (Legislative) (memorandum dated June 26, 2000) 142-176 (deferred from BCC meeting of June 20, 2000) 5. County Initiated Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±5,361 Acres from AG -1 and AG -2 to C-1, and to Rezone those ±5,361 Acres from A-1 and A-2 to Con -1; to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±3,288 Acres from AG -2 to C-1, and to Re- zone those ±3,288 Acres from A-2 to Con -1; to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±44.4 Acres From L-1 to C-1, and to Rezone those ±44.4 Acres from A-1 to Con -1; and to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±20 Acres from L-2 to C-1, and to Rezone those ±20 Acres from RS -3 to Con -1 (Legislative) (memorandum dated June 16, 2000) 177-201 BK 114 PG 004 • • 9. PUBLIC ITEMS kont'd.): BACKUP A. PUBLIC HEARINGS kont'd.l: PAGES 6. Santa Maria of Vero Development, Inc. Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±17.8 Acres from M-1 to C/I, and to Rezone those ±17.8 Acres from RM -8 to CG (Legislative) (memorandum dated June 30, 2000) 202-231 7. Gerald R. Clontz's Request to Amend the Compre- hensive Plan to Redesignate approximately 30.8 acres from AG -1 to M-1; to rezone those 30.8 acres from A-1 to RM -8; and to expand the Urban Service Area to include those ±30.8 acres (Legislative) (memorandum dated June 30, 2000) 232-259 8. Beuttell Development and Kirk Koehler, Trustee, Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±195.7 acres from AG -1 to L-1; and to Expand the Urban Service Area to Include those ±195.7 Acres (Legislative) (memorandum dated June 15, 2000) B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS Request by Francis M. Coffey to comment on the proposals for the North County Recreation Complex (deferred from BCC meeting of June 13, 2000) C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS Public Hearings scheduled for July 18, 2000: 1. LDR Amendments: a. Traffic Impact Fees for Golf Course Projects b. SR 60 Corridor Window Signs C. Wabasso Corridor: additional requirements in the CR510 East Corridor Sub -area 260-290 d. SR 60 corridor freestanding signs near I-95 e. Building Height Regulations 2. Joseph & Beverly Driver's request for an abandonment of a portion of 128`h Court in Roseland (Legislative) (memorandum dated July 5, 2000) 291-292 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS. None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development None BK 114 PG 005 BACKUP 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): B. Emergency Services PAGES None C. General Services None D. Leisure Services None E. Office of Management and Budget None F. Personnel None G. Public Works 1. North County Park (memorandum dated June 7, 2000) (deferred from BCC meeting of June 13, 2000) 293-302 2. Ript-of-Way Acquisition 16 Street between 66h and 74`h Avenues Street Paving and Drainage Improvements Donald E. Smith, Trustee (memorandum dated June 21, 2000) 303-309 3. Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Imsrovements to and set Public Hearing date for: 19 Avenue SW between 10`h St. SW & 9h St. SW & 10`x' St. SW between 20`h Ave. SW & 18'' Ave. SW (memorandum dated June 28, 2000) 310-319 4. Arbor Trace Subdivision Right -of -Way Acquisition (memorandum dated July 3, 2000) 320-325 H. Utilities 1. Amendment `A' to Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. for Technical Assistance Related to the Proposed Blue Heron (Calpine) Electric Power Generation Facility (memorandum dated June 29, 2000) 326-336 2. Extension of Water Service along the west side of US Highway One — City of Sebastian Request (memorandum dated June 23, 2000) 337-344 8K 114 PG 006 0 0 BACKUP 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): PAGES H. Utilities (cont'd.): 3. Floravon Shores —110'h Place Water Service Resolution IV — Final Assessment (memorandum dated June 23, 2000) 345-349 4. Utility Services Request by City of Fellsmere (memorandum dated July 11, 2000) 350-363 I. Human Services None 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Grant of Utility and Access Easement to Camille 0. Hoffman (memorandum dated June 21, 2000) 364-369 B. Resolution Appointing Value Adjustment Board Members and Providing for Per Diem Compensation for Value Adjustment Board Members (memorandum dated June 26, 2000) 370-375 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Fran B. Adams B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Public Workshop — Dodgers Negotiations (no backup provided) C. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Presentation of check in amount of $29,934 by Paul Tritack of Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge (no backup provided) E. Commissioner John W. Tippin BK 114 PG 007 BACKUP 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS PAGES A. Emergency Services District 1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of April 11, 2000 2. Authorization to Purchase Replacement Outboard Engines from Yamaha Corporation on a Sole Source Basis; Waive Formal Bidding; and Funding Approval (memorandum dated June 26, 2000) 376-380 3. Authorization for County Administrator to Execute Teamsters Union Recognition Acknowledgement Petition on Behalf of the District Board (memorandum dated July 5, 2000) 381-388 B. Solid Waste Disposal District 1. Second Phase of Source Assessment Preliminary Remedial Action Plan (memorandum dated June 23, 2000) 389-405 2. Recycling / Collection Center Safety Improvements (memorandum dated June 15, 2000) 406-417 3. Interagency / Public Works Agreement (memorandum dated June 20, 2000) 418-423 4. I.R. Correctional Institution's Request for Solid Waste Assessment Adjustment (memorandum dated June 20, 2000) 424-426 C. Environmental Control Board None 15. ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m • INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JULY 11, 2000 1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1- 2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1- 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 2- 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................. .2- 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ........................ .2- 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NNE 13, 2000 .......................... 2- 7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... .3- 7.A. Reports ................................................. .3- 7.B. List of Warrants ............................................ 3- 7.C. List of Warrants .......................................... .10- 7.D. List of Warrants .......................................... .20- 7.E. Homeless Task Force - Resignation of Rev. F. H. Reardon ......... .27- 7.F. Treasure Coast Economic Development District - Appointment of George H.Haygood............................................. .28 - JULY 119 2000 -1- BK 114 PG 009 • 7.G. Senior Management Class Designation - Executive Aide to the Board - Assistant County Administrator - County Attorney - Deputy County Attorney............................................... .28- 7.H. Edward Byrne Memorial State Grant and National Criminal History Improvement Program for Circuit Court - Certificate of Acceptance - Department of Community Affairs ............................ .29- 7.I. Derelict Vessel Removal Program Grant Application - Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ........................... .31- 7.J. BellSouth Mobility and Crown Castle International (3955 65" Street Tower) - Sub -Lease Agreement .............................. .32- 7.K. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #016 ....................... .33- 7.L. Grace United Methodist Church, 8799 5& Avenue, Wabasso - Temporary Water Service Agreement .................................. .35- 7.M. C. Patrick Flood III and Brooke H. Flood, 560 Durant Street, Sebastian - Temporary Water Service Agreement ......................... .36- 7.N. Resolution 2000-070 Authorizing County Administrator to Sign Assumption Agreements ................................... .37- 7.0. Resolution 2000-071 Authorizing Master Street Lighting Agreement with Florida Power & Light (FPL) and Authorizing County Administrator or Public Works Director to Sign .............................. .40- 7.P. Coalition for the Homeless (Continuum of Care) - To Be Known as "Indian River Homeless Services Council, Inc." - Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Application ............................................. .44 - JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG 010 8. SHERIFF GARY C. WHEELER - AMEND 1999-00 BUDGET TO REFLECT OUT -OF -COUNTY INMATE REVENUE .......................... .45- 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-019 ADOPTING SECTION 210.04, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR LOCAL COLLECTION, ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT OF THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX; PROVIDING FOR REMITTANCE OF THE TAX TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT POWERS; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 1, 2000 .................................... .47- 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-020 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS .... -57- 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - WE CARE OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC. - APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO PROVIDE NON -EMERGENCY BAKER ACT INTERFACILITY TRANSPORT SERVICES ........................ .60 - JULY 119 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 0 11 L 9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - PARADISE PARTNERS, INC. - ORDINANCE 2000-021 AND ORDINANCE 2000-022 AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ±249 FEET SOUTH OF CR -512 AND ±235 FEET EAST OF CR -510 FROM C/I TO L-1 AND BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CR -512 ±300 FEET EAST OF CR -5 10 FROM L-1 TO C/I (Legislative) ........................................... .62- 9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2000-072 AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OF REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY (A) CARSON PLATT - REDESIGNATING ±5,361 ACRES FROM AG -1 AND AG -2 TO C-1 AND REZONING THOSE ±5,361 ACRES FROM A-1 AND A-2 TO CON -1; (B) BERRY GROVES - REDESIGNATING ±3,288 ACRES FROM AG -2 TO C-1 AND REZONING THOSE ±3,288 ACRES FROM A-2 TO CON -1; (C) PELICAN ISLAND NWR - REDESIGNATING ±44.4 ACRES FROM L-1 TO C- 1 AND REZONING THOSE ±44.4 ACRES FROM A-1 TO CON -1; AND (D) WOMEN'S CLUB TRACT - REDESIGNATING ±20 ACRES FROM L-2 TO C- 1 AND REZONING THOSE ±20 ACRES FROM RS -3 TO CON-1(Legislative) ............................................................ .82 - JULY 11, 2000 8K 114 PG 012 • 9.A.6. PUBLIC HEARING - SANTA MARIA OF VERO DEVELOPMENT, INC. REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±17.8 ACRES FROM M-1 TO C/I AND TO REZONE THOSE ±17.8 ACRES FROM RM -8 TO CG (Legislative) (Denied) ........................ .103- 9.A.7. PUBLIC HEARING - GERALD R. CLONTZ REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE APPROXIMATELY 30.8 ACRES FROM AG -1 TO M-1 AND TO REZONE THOSE 30.8 ACRES FROM A-1 TO RM -8 AND TO EXPAND THE URBAN SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE THOSE ±30.8 ACRES (Legislative) (Denied) .............. .119- 9.A.8. PUBLIC HEARING - BEUTTELL DEVELOPMENT AND KIRK KOEHLER, TRUSTEE REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±195.7 ACRES FROM AG -1 TO L-1 AND TO EXPAND THE URBAN SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE THOSE ±195.7 ACRES (Legislative) ................................................ .135- JULY 119 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 0 9 3 -5- • 9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY - REQUEST TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSALS FOR THE NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMPLEX ..................................... .136- 9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 18, 2000 ........................................................... .139- 1. LDR AMENDMENTS: A. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES FOR GOLF COURSE PROJECTS; B. SR -60 CORRIDOR WINDOW SIGNS; C. WABASSO CORRIDOR; ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE CR -5 10 EAST CORRIDOR SUB -AREA D. SR -60 CORRIDOR FREESTANDING SIGNS NEAR I-95; E. BUILDING HEIGHT REGULATIONS 2. JOSEPH AND BEVERLY DRIVER - REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF 128TH COURT, ROSELAND (LEGISLATIVE) ..................................................... .140- 11.G.1. NORTH COUNTY PARK - BRAD SMITH & ASSOCIATES - WELLER POOLS............................................... .142- 1 1.G.2. 16TH STREET BETWEEN 661H AND 74TH AVENUES - RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - DONALD E. SMITH, TRUSTEE .......... .147 - JULY 119 2000 BK 1 14 PG 014 0 : 0 11.G.3. RESOLUTION 2000-073 PROVIDING FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW AND 101H STREET SW BETWEEN 20TH AVENUE SW AND 18TH AVENUE SW, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION AND RESOLUTION 2000-074 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE ....... .149- I LGA. ARBOR TRACE SUBDIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP ......................... .163- 11.11.1. PROPOSED BLUE HERON (CALPINE) ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION FACILITY - AMENDMENT A TO CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. CONTRACT FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ... -164- 11.H.2. EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US#1- REQUEST BY THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN ............ .166- 11.H.3. RESOLUTION 2000-075 - FLORAVON SHORES (110TH PLACE) WATER SERVICE - FINAL ASSESSMENT .................. .168- 11.H.4. CITY OF FELLSMERE - UTILITY SERVICES REQUEST ....... .172- 12.A. COUNTY ATTORNEY - CAMILLE O. HOFFMAN - GRANT OF UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENT - PARCEL 108 - INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD ........................................................... .174 - JULY 119 2000 -7- 6K 114 PG 01 12.B. COUNTY ATTORNEY - APPOINT VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD MEMBERS AND REJECT PER DIEM COMPENSATION ............ .176- 13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN CAROLINE D. GINN - DODGERS NEGOTIATIONS - PUBLIC WORKSHOP ........................................ .178- 13.D. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE - PELICAN ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE - REVENUE SHARING CHECK - PRESENTATION BY PAUL TRITAIK............................................. .179- 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ............................ .183- 14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ........................... .183- 14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ......................... .183 - JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG 016 -8- 0 0 • July 11, 2000 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25fl` Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, July 11, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; John W. Tippin; and Ruth Stanbridge. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney; and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Adams called the meeting to order and introduced the new County Attorney Paul G. Bangel. Mr. Bangel replied that he was looking forward to assisting the Board in any way he could. 2. INVOCATION Commissioner Ginn delivered the Invocation. JULY 119 2000 -1- BK 114 PG 017 • 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA Chairman Adams announced the deletion of Item 9.A.8., Beuttell Development and Kirk Koehler, Trustee, request to amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate ±195.7 acres from AG -1 to L-1 and to expand the Urban Service Area to include those ±195.7 acres. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously deleted the above item from the Agenda. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 13, 2000 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 13, 2000. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 13, 2000, as written. JULY 119 2000 -2- 0 BK 114 PG 018 • r-1 7. CONSENT AGENDA Chairman Adams asked that Item 71 be separated for discussion. Commissioner Grin asked that Item 7.P. be separated for discussion. 7.A. REPORTS The following reports were received and are on file in the office of the Clerk to the 1. Delta Farms Water Control District Budget for FY 2000-01 2. City of Sebastian Notice of Public Hearing on July 6, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. re: Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Municipal Canoe Launch on 1.91 Acre Site Located on the West Side of the Sebastian River 7.B. LIST OF WARRANTS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 15, 2000: To: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: NNE 15, 2000 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR, FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of June 15, 2000 to June 15. 2000. JULY 11, 2000 -3- BK 114 PG 019 • I ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued by the Clerk to the Board for June 15, 2000, as recommended by staff. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284291 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-06-15 19.50 0284292 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION 2000-06-15 381.29 0284293 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 2000-06-15 3,171.96 0284294 ATLANTIC REPORTING 2000-06-15 245.25 0284295 ABS PUMPS, INC 2000-06-15 12,261.33 0284296 AQUAGENI% LAND -WATER 2000-06-15 176.00 0284297 ALL POWER SERVICES, INC 2000-06-15 425.00 0284298 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 2000-06-15 59.90 0284299 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2000-06-15 392.59 0284300 ADAMS, FRAN B 2000-06-15 120.48 0284301 A T & T 2000-06-15 34.71 0284302 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE 2000-06-15 43,776.68 0284303 A B C CUTTING CONTRACTORS, INC 2000-06-15 235.00 0284304 ASPHALT RECYCLING,INC 2000-06-15 39,770.60 0284305 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000-06-15 188.00 0284306 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC 2000-06-15 1,529.70 0284307 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS 2000-06-15 23.95 0284308 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 2000-06-15 644.20 0284309 AFRICAN REPORTING 2000-06-15 46.00 0284310 ARCH PAGING 2000-06-15 680.45 0284311 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000-06-15 60.00 0284312 A T & T 2000-06-15 29.49 0284313 APOLLO ENTERPRISES 2000-06-15 43.94 0284314 AMERICAN ENGINEERING SERVICES 2000-06-15 298.59 0284315 ANCOR CORF INC. 2000-06-15 383.40 0284316 AMERITREND HOMES 2000-06-15 500.00 0284317 ATLANTIC ORTHOPAEDIC GROUP 2000-06-15 3,122.00 0284318 ABC PRINTING CO 2000-06-15 300.56 0284319 AUDETTE, COLLEEN 2000-06-15 20.00 0284320 ARTS 2000-06-15 40.00 0284321 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2000-06-15 137.67 0284322 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 2000-06-15 4,366.00 0284323 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2000-06-15 5,578,69 0284324 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 2000-06-15 40.00 0284325 BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY 2000-06-15 363.13 0284326 BROOKS, RONALD R 2000-06-15 132.29 0284327 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 2000-06-15 39,617.51 0284328 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 2000-06-15 2,605.97 0284329 BISAILLON, THOMAS 2000-06-15 254.88 0284330 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-06-15 3,445.53 0284331 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2000-06-15 461.18 0284332 BRODART CO 2000-06-15 209.40 JULY 119 2000 BK 1 14 PG 020 -4- • 0 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284333 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2000-06-15 47.88 0284334 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 2000-06-15 25.67 0284335 BELLSOUTH 2000-06-15 23,026.77 0284336 BEAZER HOMES, INC 2000-06-15 500.00 0284337 BUTLER, RYAN L 2000-06-15 200.00 0284338 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-06-15 30,145.01 0284339 BMG 2000-06-15 41.60 0284340 BOYES & FARINA P A 2000-06-15 2,924.48 0284341 BASS-CARLTON SOD INC 2000-06-15 762.00 0284342 BETA TECH CORP 2000-06-15 140.00 0284343 BIG APPLE PIZZA 2000-06-15 500.00 0284344 BRANDES, MICHAEL 2000-06-15 337.05 0284345 BLACK, RICHARD OR 2000-06-15 500.00 0284346 BELLSOUTH 2000-06-15 313.08 0284347 CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY 2000-06-15- 546.17 0284348 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC 2000-06-15 500.00 0284349 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-06-15 30,395.20 0284350 CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC 2000-06-15 444.30 0284351 CLASSIC AWARDS. 2000-06-15 44.92 0284352 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 2000-06-15 367.42 0284353 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 2000-06-15 278.00 0284354 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS 2000-06-15 2,217.44 0284355 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 2000-06-15 205.01 0284356 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E 2000-06-15 133.00 0284357 CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC 2000-06-15 64.18 0284358 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 2000-06-15 8,583.61 0284359 CLINIC PHARMACY 2000-06-15 1,404.90 0284360 CLARKE, DOROTHEA 2000-06-15 20.88 0284361 CAPP CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC 2000-06-15 1,000.00 0284362 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY 2000-06-15 425.21 0284363 CALL ONE, INC 2000-06-15 100.00 0284364 CLEANNET USA 2000-06-15 20,537.72 0284365 CRAFTS & STUFF 2000-06-15 303.55 0284366 COPELAND, JAMES E , M D 2000-06-15 24.65 0284367 CALCIQUEST, INC 2000-06-15 14,086.66 0284368 CLIFFORD, MIKE 2000-06-15 100.00 0284369 CAPITAL CONTROLS CO.,INC 2000-06-15 104.79 0284370 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 2000-06-15 179.00 0284371 CSR AMERICA, INC. 2000-06-15 346.00 0284372 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2000-06-15 171.00 0284373 COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF 2000-06-15 96.70 0284374 CONGRESSIONAL DIGEST CORP 2000-06-15 47.00 0284375 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2000-06-15 196.65 0284376 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2000-06-15 381.82 0284377 CHEMICAL SERVICES CO 2000-06-15 131,000.00 0284378 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 2000-06-15 75.00 0284379 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 2000-06-15 2,253.00 0284380 CHANNING CORP 2000-06-15 3,500.00 0284381 COASTAL CARE CORPORATION 2000-06-15 4,295.88 0284382 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 2000-06-15 154.39 0284383 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 2000-06-15 1,262.50 0284384 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2000-06-15 721.07 0284385 DEMCO INC 2000-06-15 3,242.90 0284386 DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC 2000-06-15 816.91 0284387 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC 2000-06-15 4,127.29 0284388 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 2000-06-15 670.05 0284389 DUVAL FORD 2000-06-15 48,859.00 0284390 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 2000-06-15 1,312.45 0284391 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 2000-06-15 224.19 0284392 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2000-06-15 42,25 JULY 119 2000 -5- BK 114 PG 02 1 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284393 DTN CORPORATION 2000-06-15 56.00 0284394 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC 2000-06-15 3,065.75 0284395 E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC 2000-06-15 75.50 0284396 ELLIS K PHELPS AND CO, INC 2000-06-15 15,000.00 0284397 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIP, INC 2000-06-15 182.96 0284398 ELPEX, INC 2000-06-15 137.32 0284399 EXPEDITER INC, THE 2000-06-15 48.63 0284400 ENCORE BROADCAST EQUIPMENT 2000-06-15 1,569.50 0284401 FLORIDA BAR, THE 2000-06-15 290.00 0284402 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2000-06-15 340.00 0284403 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2000-06-15 13,090.47 0284404 FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC 2000-06-15 5,229.00 0284405 FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING 2000-06-15 1,267.00 0284406 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2000-06-15 15.13 0284407 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC 2000-06-15 1,899.45 0284408 FRANKLIN PRODUCTS CORP 2000-06-15 2,118.00 0284409 FALZONE, KATHY 2000-06-15 35.00 0284410 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2000-06-15 15.00 0284411 FLORIDA DATABASE SYSTEMS, INC 2000-06-15 6,350.00 0284412 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC 2000-06-15 83.22 0284413 FACTICON, INC 2000-06-15 150.00 0284414 FINISHMASTER INC 2000-06-15 183.37 0284415 FLORIDA DEPT ENVIRONMENTAL 2000-06-15 525.00 0284416 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2000-06-15 1,109.84 0284417 FLORIDA DEPT OF LABOR & 2000-06-15 25,551.76 0284418 FELIX EQUITIES, INC 2000-06-15 38,777.35 0284419 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC 2000-06-15 24.00 0284420 GALE GROUP, THE 2000-06-15 418.17 0284421 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY 2000-06-15 7.49 0284422 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 2000-06-15 114.95 0284423 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-06-15 1,195.13 0284424 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2000-06-15 72.03 0284425 GALL'S INC 2000-06-15 114.99 0284426 GREYHOUND LINES, INC. 2000-06-15 344.00 0284427 GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY 2000-06-15 4,149.10 0284428 GOLDEN, DAVID 2000-06-15 500.00 0284429 HALL, PAMELA J 2000-06-15 978.66 0284430 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2000-06-15 468.46 0284431 HECTOR TURF, INC 2000-06-15 61,877.88 0284432 HELENA CHEMICAL CO 2000-06-15 321.30 0284433 HICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT 2000-06-15 384.05 0284434 HUGHES SUPPLY, INC 2000-06-15 1,874.80 0284435 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2000-06-15 20,145.00 0284436 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2000-06-15 356.86 0284437 HERITAGE QUEST 2000-06-15 194.59 0284438 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 2000-06-15 31.50 0284439 HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER 2000-06-15 2,083.33 0284440 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS SANFORD 2000-06-15 130.00 0284441 HACH COMPANY 2000-06-15 1,545.00 0284442 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2000-06-15 60,469.91 0284443 HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2000-06-15 15,665.22 0284444 HORIZON NURSERY 2000-06-15 943.08 0284445 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2000-06-15 100.00 0284446 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2000-06-15 2,000.00 0284447 HOME DEPOT 2000-06-15 39.97 0284448 HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE 2000-06-15 713.45 0284449 HOLMES, EDWARD 2000-06-15 180.00 0284450 HEALY, DENNIS 2000-06-15 500.00 0284451 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2000-06-15 1,388.70 0284452 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-06-15 175.00 0284453 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC 2000-06-15 370.50 0284454 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 2000-06-15 1,323.25 JULY 119 2000 au1 1 4 PG 022 on -6- • CHECK NAME NUMBER CHECK CHECK DATE AMOUN-, 0284455 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2000-06-15 0284456 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2000-06-15 672.93 0284457 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC 2000 -06 -IS 107.75 0284458 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2000-06-15 491.24 0284459 INFILCO DEGREMONT, INC 9.35 0284460 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2000-06-15 4,080.00 0284461 INSURANCE SERVICING & 2000-06-15 2.442.99 0284462 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 2000-06-15 2,375.00 0284463 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2000-06-15 197.32 0284464 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2000-06-15 226.131.46 0284465 INTERIM PERSONNEL 2000-06-15 167.10 0284466 IDENTIFAX INVESTIGATIVE 293.76 0284467 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALLIANCE 2000-06-15 580.09 0284468 IMI -NET, INC561.57 2000-06-15 0284469 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2000-06-15 450.00 0284470 INDIAN RIVER INDUSTRIAL 410.00 0284471 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2000-06-15 92,604.47 0284472 JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS 2000-06-15 67.00 0284473 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 2000-06-15 250.00 0284474 JACOBS GROUP, INC 2000-06-15 82.76 6,507.00 0284475 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 2000-06-15 32.38 0284476 J M MORRISON PLUMBING 2000-06-15 1,920.00 0284477 JEROME, CRAIG P. 2000-06-15 139.51 0284478 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 2000-06-15 638.00 0284479 KELLY-CRESWELL CO INC 2000-06-15 116.46 0284480 KELLY TRACTOR CO 2000-06-15 64.06 0284481 KT MOWER & EQUIPMENT 2000-06-15 315.11 0284482 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2000-06-15 1,868.11 0284483 LANDRUM, GREGORY C PSY D 2000-06-15 625.00 0284484 LIVE OAK ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2000-06-15 23.50 0284485 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2000-06-15 93.50 0284486 LAPORTE, BOB 2000-06-15 500.00 0284487 LESCO, INC 2000-06-15 845.53 0284488 LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO 2000-06-15 267.68 0284489 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 2000-06-15 500.00 0284490 L BENNETT, JR CONSTRUCTION CO 2000-06-15 750.00 0284491 LAMOTTE COMPANY 2000-06-15 47.51 0284492 LUNDMARK, ALEX 2000-06-15 74.68 0284493 LINDSEY, DAWN 2000-06-15 30.00 0284494 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 2000-06-15 171.78 0284495 MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC 2000-06-15 39.95 0284496 MIKES GARAGE 2000-06-15 85.00 0284497 MICRO WAREHOUSE 2000-06-15 2,274.81 0284498 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC 2000-06-15 20.44 0284499 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 2000-06-15 125.62 0284500 M G B CONSTRUCTION 2000-06-15 500.00 0284501 MARINE, LEWANA 2000-06-15 20.00 0284502 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 2000-06-15 34.60 0284503 MICKLE, VALERIE 2000-06-15 100.98 0284504 MCGUIRE, GEORGE SEAN 2000-06-15 45.82 0284505 MEZZINA, PATRICIA 2000-06-15 677.76 0284506 MEYER, NORMAN MD 2000-06-15 24.65 0284507 MURPHY, DEBBIE 2000-06-15 150.00 0284508 MARTIN, CRISTI 2000-06-15 122.50 0284509 MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES, INC 2000-06-15 35.11 0284510 MPI NET 2000-06-15 375.00 0284511 MID -FLORIDA FORKLIFT, INC 2000-06-15 112.50 0284512 NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS 2000-06-15 55.00 0284513 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 2000-06-15 81.59 0284514 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO 2000-06-15 2,080.00 0284515 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 2000-06-15 33,369.25 JULY 119 2000 8K 114 PG 023 • CHECK NAME NUMBER CHECK CHECK DATE AMOUNT 0284516 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 2000-06-15 511.40 0284517 NATIVE TREES 2000-06-15 243.00 0284518 NU CO 2, INC 2000-06-15 84.00 0284519 NEFCO, INC 2000-06-15 2,012.50 0284520 NORTRAX EQUIPMENT COMPANY 2000-06-15 327.75 0284521 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS 2000-06-15 3,829.00 0284522 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2000-06-15 1,195.00 0284523 NORTH STAR TECHNICAL SERVICES, 2000-06-15 3,815.00 0284524 OMNIGRAPHICS, INC 2000-06-15 203.00 0284525 ON IT'S WAY 2000-06-15 94.00 0284526 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 2000-06-15 269.49 0284527 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 2000-06-15 16,965.13 0284528 ORLANDO, KAREN M 2000-06-15 255.50 0284529 ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT 2000-06-15 587.50 0284530 O'BRIEN, JEFFREY MD 2000-06-15 450.00 0284531 PARKS RENTAL INC 2000-06-15 2,167.32 0284532 PARKSON CORPORATION 2000-06-15 9,000.00 0284533 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC 2000-06-15 185.23 0284534 PERKINS DRUG, INC 2000-06-15 234.10 0284535 PERKINS INDIAN.RIVER PHARMACY 2000-06-15 279.32 0284536 POSTMASTER 2000-06-15 10,000.00 0284537 PUBLIC DEFENDER 2000-06-15 2,718.92 0284538 PETTY CASH 2000-06-15 248.20 0284539 POWERAM, INC 2000-06-15 671.50 0284540 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 2000-06-15 549.48 0284541 PRESS JOURNAL 2000-06-15 122.00 0284542 PLANT HAVEN WHOLESALE NURSERY, 2000-06-15 402.00 0284543 PAGE, LIVINGSTON 2000-06-15 390.00 0284544 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2000-06-15 74.75 0284545 PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT 2000-06-15 136.75 0284546 PEGASUS TRAVEL 2000-06-15 483.00 0284547 PMX MEDICAL 2000-06-15 129.50 0284548 PUBLIX PHARMACY 2000-06-15 26.00 0284549 PHOENIX PRODUCTS, INC 2000-06-15 2,241.40 0284550 P J KENEDY & SONS 2000-06-15 278.43 0284551 P B S & J 2000-06-15 1,400.00 0284552 PARSONS TECHNOLOGY 2000-06-15 36.00 0284553 QUALITY BOOKS, INC 2000-06-15 2,379.95 0284554 QUINLAN PUBLISHING GROUP 2000-06-15 74.99 0284555 RADIOSHACK 2000-06-15 174.38 0284556 ROY, DORI 2000-06-15 135.56 0284557 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC 2000-06-15 3,512.00 0284558 RIORDAN, MICHAEL C PSY.D. 2000-06-15 900.00 0284559 RADKE, PETER 2000-06-15 20.30 0284560 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 2000-06-15 1,047.46 0284561 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2000-06-15 1,511.69 0284562 RUNGE, SUZANNE 2000-06-15 99.50 0284563 SCOTTY'S, INC 2000-06-15 7.61 0284564 SCOTTY'S, INC 2000-06-15 80.88 0284565 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC 2000-06-15 71.66 0284566 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC 2000-06-15 386.98 0284567 SMART CORPORATION 2000-06-15 30.62 0284568 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 2000-06-15 418.65 0284569 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2000-06-15 5.67 0284570 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 2000-06-15 201.45 0284571 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2000-06-15 81.00 0284572 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES 2000-06-15 299.92 0284573 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 2000-06-15 16,803.28 0284574 SPALDING 2000-06-15 538.62 0284575 SALEM PRESS, INC 2000-06-15 121.00 0284576 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2000-06-15 324.83 JULY 119 2000 oK 114 PG 024 -8- 0 0 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284577 STAMM MANUFACTURING 2000-06-15 237.50 0284578 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO 2000-06-15 180.36 0284579 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2000-06-15 732.35 0284580 SANITAIRE CORP 2000-06-15 1,080.00 0284581 SAMPLE, ROBERT. 2000-06-15 70.00 0284582 SEBASTIAN POWER CENTER RENTAL 2000-06-15 49.00 0284583 SAMARITAN CENTER 2000-06-15 2,974.00 0284584 SOUTHERN MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS 2000-06-15 116.25 0284585 TARMAC AMERICA INC 2000-06-15 525.00 0284586 TEEJAYS' 2000-06-15 45.00 0284587 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-06-15 7,027.63 0284588 TITLEIST DRAWER 2000-06-15 446.50 0284589 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 2000-06-15 251.34 0284590 TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC 2000-06-15 1,900.00 0284591 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2000-06-15 6,335.55 0284592 TRI -COUNTY CONCRETE PRODUCTS 2000-06-15 2,470.00 0284593 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2000-06-15 25.00 0284594 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 2000-06-15 243.26 0284595 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-06-15 68.31 0284596 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-06-15 1,730.68 0284597 TREASURE COAST SPORTS 2000-06-15 2,500.00 0284598 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2000-06-15 24,510.83 0284599 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 2000-06-15 3,893.40 0284600 UNISHIPPERS 2000-06-15 10.04 0284601 U.S. FILTER 2000-06-15 14,200.56 0284602 VELDE FORD, INC 2000-06-15 453.34 0284603 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-06-15 57,961.47 0284604 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC 2000-06-15 203.82 0284605 VIRGIL'S RADIATOR WORKS 2000-06-15 217.50 0284606 VERO MARINE CENTER, INC 2000-06-15 44.60 0284607 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-06-15 82.27 0284608 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-06-15 25.00 0284609 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2000-06-15 418.40 0284610 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 2000-06-15 50.00 0284611 VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN 2000-06-15 16.36 0284612 VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO 2000-06-15 1,173.03 0284613 VALVE & CONTROLS 2000-06-15 84.86 0284614 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-06-15 289.10 0284615 WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608 2000-06-15 1,055.70 0284616 WHEELER, GARY C 2000-06-15 76,471.00 0284617 W W GRAINGER, INC 2000-06-15 373.12 0284618 WILLHOFF, PATSY 2000-06-15 130.00 0284619 WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF 2000-06-15 19,269.02 0284620 WATERWORKS CAR WASH 2000-06-15 257.00 0284621 WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642 2000-06-15 94.86 0284622 WASHINGTON ALUMINUM COMPANY 2000-06-15 5,293.40 0284623 WALGREEN CO 2000-06-15 787.68 0284624 WALGREENS PHARMACY #04619 2000-06-15 15.00 0284625 WARMINSTER FIBERGLASS CO 2000-06-15 2,050.00 0284626 WILLIAM GLOVER INC 2000-06-15 111,746.88 0284627 WALTHER, AMELIA 2000-06-15 133.90 0284628 XEROX CORPORATION 2000-06-15 422.33 JULY 119 2000 1,640,308.19 BK 1 14 PG 025 I Z C. LIST OF WARRANTS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 22,,2000: To: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JUNE 22, 2000 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of June 14, 2000 to June 22, 2000. JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued by the Clerk to the Board for June 14, 2000 through June 22, 2000, as recommended by staff. BK 1 44 PG 026 -10- 0 0 • JULY 11, 2000 BK 114 PG 027 • CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 0020604 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2000-06-14 3,936.36 0020605 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2000-06-14 6,487.50 0020606 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2000-06-14 133.10 0020607 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-06-14 0020608 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 2000-06-14 1,428.42 29.46 0020609 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 2000-06-14 442.80 0020610 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2000-06-14 6,511.82 0020611 KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE 2000-06-21 138.50 0020612 BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR 2000-06-21 92.31 0020613 WI SCTF 000-06-21 150.00 0020614 VELASQUEZ, MERIDA 2000-06-21 200.00 0020615 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 2000-06-21 170.98 0020616 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2000-06-21 225.00 0020617 IRS - ACS 2000-06-21 50.00 0020618 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 2000-06-21 521.88 0020619 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. 2000-06-21 2,070.00 0020620 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 2000-06-21 81,121.59 0020621 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 2000-06-21 231.03 0020622 NACO/SOUTHEAST 2000-06-21 7,870.49 0020623 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 2000-06-21 397.33 0020624 WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS 2000-06-21 23.08 0020625 FL SDU 2000-06-21 6,906.14 0284629 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-06-22 655.50 0284630 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2000-06-22 1,841.01 0284631 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC 2000-06-22 125.00 0284632 AIRBORNE EXPRESS 2000-06-22 21.32 0284633 AMERICAN BUSINESS INTERIORS 2000-06-22 750.12 0284634 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO 2000-06-22 1,448.03 0284635 ARMFIELD-WAGNER APPRAISAL 2000-06-22 500.00 0284636 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 2000-06-22 957.67 0284637 ATLANTIC REPORTING 2000-06-22 492.10 0284638 ABS PUMPS, INC 2000-06-22 2,377.75 0284639 ACTION DIESEL INJECTION 2000-06-22 690.25 0284640 A M E C INC 2000-06-22 924.47 0284641 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 2000-06-22 59.90 0284642 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 2000-06-22 137.75 0284643 ADDISON OIL CO 2000-06-22 1,946.61 0284644 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2000-06-22 132.08 0284645 A T & T 2000-06-22 101.46 0284646 AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE 2000-06-22 179.50 0284647 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000-06-22 808.00 0284648 ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC 2000-06-22 15.00 0284649 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC 2000-06-22 588.36 0284650 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS 2000-06-22 114.29 0284651 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 2000-06-22 105.91 0284652 APPERSON CHEMICALS,INC 2000-06-22 4,817.55 0284653 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000-06-22 424.48 0284654 ANICOM, INC 2000-06-22 993.00 0284655 AMERICAN WATER CHEMICALS, INC 2000-06-22 5,186.75 0284656 ASSOCIATES, THE 2000-06-22 7,310.16 0284657 ADAMS, PAULA 2000-06-22 23.54 0284658 AUROR TITLE & ESCROW OF 2000-06-22 406.10 0284659 ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC 2000-06-22 22.00 0284660 B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 2000-06-22 731.88 0284661 BAIRD, JOSEPH A 2000-06-22 1,041.45 0284662 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2000-06-22 1,003.98 0284663 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 2000-06-22 2,902.50 JULY 11, 2000 BK 114 PG 027 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284664 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2000-06-22 4,924.41 0284665 BIO -SERVICES OF VERO, INC 2000-06-22 60.00 0284666 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-06-22 12,015.33 0284667 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2000-06-22 1,577.31 0284668 BRODART CO 2000-06-22 2,245.66 0284669 BOWKER 2000-06-22 178.16 0284670 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION 2000-06-22 1,825.23 0284671 BFI WASTE SYSTEMS 2000-06-22 157.54 0284672 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 2000-06-22 62.00 0284673 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 2000-06-22 99.35 0284674 BETTER COPY CENTER, A 2000-06-22 1,090.88 0284675 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-06-22 16,640.38 0284676 BELFORD, DENNIS 2000-06-22 42.00 0284677 BROOM, JENNEI LUE 2000-06-22 10.38 0284678 BIO -CHEM RESOURCES 2000-06-22 2,395.77 0284679 BELLSOUTH 2000-06-22 2,131.40 0284680 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-06-22 7,608.59 0284681 CLASSIC AWARDS 2000-06-22 4.30 0284682 CLIMATIC HEATING & A/C 2000-06-22 30.00 0284683 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 2000-06-22 19,332.93 0284684 CONSUMER REPORTS BOOK 2000-06-22 38.45 0284685 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E 2000-06-22 297.50 0284686 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO 2000-06-22 193.06 0284687 CHANNING L BETE CO, INC 2000-06-22 417.29 0284688 CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC 2000-06-22 150.39 0284689 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 2000-06-22 9,778.25 0284690 CENTER FOR THE ARTS, INC 2000-06-22 3,000.00 0284691 CUSTOM HOMES 2000-06-22 500.00 0284692 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY 2000-06-22 132.67 0284693 CINDY'S PET CENTER, INC 2000-06-22 22.78 0284694 COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES 2000-06-22 9,825.00 0284695 C4 IMAGING SYSTEMS INC 2000-06-22 20.43 0284696 CYBERGUYS 2000-06-22 77.52 0284697 CSR AMERICA, INC. 2000-06-22 228.42 0284698 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2000-06-22 199.50 0284699 CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY 2000-06-22 91,924.32 0284700 COMPU MASTER 2000-06-22 199.00 0284701 COLUMBIA PROPANE 2000-06-22 10.50 0284702 COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC 2000-06-22 369.18 0284703 CENTER POINT PUBLISHING 2000-06-22 65.88 0284704 CITGO PETROLEUM CORP 2000-06-22 3,738.25 0284705 CAVILL, TOM 2000-06-22 104.00 0284706 DAVES SPORTING GOODS 2000-06-22 16.32 0284707 DEMCO INC 2000-06-22 164.55 0284708 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC 2000-06-22 1,643.10 0284709 DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC 2000-06-22 14.64 0284710 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 2000-06-22 366.83 0284711 DIETZ, DANIEL 2000-06-22 8.48 0284712 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 2000-06-22 483.32 0284713 DILLON, EDWARD D 2000-06-22 300.00 0284714 DEEHAN, WILLIAM F 2000-06-22 37.67 0284715 DONLEY, BILLY J, JR 2000-06-22 123.60 0284716 DESANTIS, BARBARA 2000-06-22 19.22 0284717 E G P, INC 2000-06-22 155.92 0284718 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC 2000-06-22 9,109.92 0284719 ENCORE BROADCAST EQUIPMENT 2000-06-22 114.87 0284720 FEDEX 2000-06-22 14.30 0284721 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO 2000-06-22 150.00 0284722 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2000-06-22 39,897.39 0284723 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2000-06-22 58.60 0284724 FLINN, SHEILA I 2000-06-22 101.50 JULY 11, 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 028 -12- • 0 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284725 FELLSMERE, CITY OF 2000-06-22 72.21 0284726 FLORIDAFFINITY, INC 2000-06-22 5,227.50 0284727 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2000-06-22 15.00 0284728 FIRE ENGINEERING 2000-06-22 24.95 0284729 FLORIDA GAME & FISH 2000-06-22 25.00 0284730 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC 2000-06-22 143.37 0284731 FACTS ON FILE INC 2000-06-22 79.89 0284732 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2000-06-22 391.49 0284733 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2000-06-22 913.72 0284734 FALCON PROPERTIES, LTD 2000-06-22 204,660.00 0284735 FOSTER, JANNA GRACE 2000-06-22 56.65 0284736 FLOW PUMP PARTS USA 2000-06-22 3,258.00 0284737 GALE GROUP, THE 2000-06-22 1,253.70 0284738 GENERAL GMC, TRUCK 2000-06-22 580.30 0284739 GENE'S AUTO GLASS 2000-06-22 265.00 0284740 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-06-22 17.58 0284741 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2000-06-22 407.55 0284742 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 2000-06-22 39.00 0284743 GINN, CAROLINE D 2000-06-22 47.04 0284744 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 2000-06-22 9,648.63 0284745 GIBSON, JAMES 2000-06-22 17.60 0284746 GALE INSULATION 2000-06-22 60.00 0284747 GRIFFITH, ISABEL & ADOLFO 2000-06-22 7.64 0284748 GREENHAVEN PRESS INC 2000-06-22 187.98 0284749 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2000-06-22 76.10 0284750 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2000-06-22 492.04 0284751 HERITAGE QUEST 2000-06-22 784.44 0284752 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 2000-06-22 154.00 0284753 HACH COMPANY 2000-06-22 209.70 0284754 HORIZON NURSERY 2000-06-22 80.00 0284755 HARTSFIELD, CELESTE L 2000-06-22 185.50 0284756 HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING 2000-06-22 770.00 0284757 HANSEN, SUSAN 2000-06-22 114.84 0284758 H L TREMBLAY, INC 2000-06-22 13,422.00 0284759 HARRIS, BRYCE L 2000-06-22 33.48 0284760 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2000-06-22 21,574.18 0284761 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-06-22 75.00 0284762 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 2000-06-22 260.00 0284763 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2000-06-22 387.87 0284764 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2000-06-22 702.02 0284765 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2000-06-22 148.35 0284766 INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WAY 2000-06-22 105.00 0284767 ISIS PUBLISHING 2000-06-22 6.75 0284768 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2000-06-22 414.51 0284769 IBM CORPORATION 2000-06-22 1,340.27 0284770 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE 2000-06-22 73,621.15 0284771 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2000-06-22 122,745.98 0284772 INTERIM PERSONNEL 2000-06-22 244.80 0284773 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALLIANCE 2000-06-22 401.02 0284774 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S 2000-06-22 25.00 0284775 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF 2000-06-22 300.00 0284776 IKON TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION 2000-06-22 1,310.00 0284777 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2000-06-22 241.65 0284778 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 2000-06-22 175.27 0284779 JIFFY PHOTO CENTER 2000-06-22 7.50 0284780 JUDAH, KAREN E 2000-06-22 18.03 0284781 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2000-06-22 1,801.74 0284782 JACK CARUSO'S REGENCY DODGE 2000-06-22 17,703.00 0284783 KEY, PATRICIA W 2000-06-22 133.00 0284784 KOMPAN SOUTHEASR, INC 2000-06-22 696.34 0284785 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2000-06-22 1,483.29 JULY 119 2000 -13- 8K Iii PG OZ • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284786 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 2000-06-22 241.45 0284787 WILMA KELSO 2000-06-22 500.00 0284788 LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE 2000-06-22 50.00 0284789 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2000-06-22 1,865.58 0284790 L B SMITH, INC 2000-06-22 956.90 0284791 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2000-06-22 1,481.22 0284792 LFI VERO BEACH, INC 2000-06-22 220.56 0284793 LOPRESTI, ETTA 2000-06-22 122.62 0284794 LEXANIDES, GEORGE 2000-06-22 8,000.00 0284795 LLOYD, ROBIN A & ASSOCIATES 2000-06-22 369.18 0284796 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES 2000-06-22 121.29 0284797 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 2000-06-22 255.50 0284798 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 2000-06-22 557.50 0284799 LUNDMARK, ALEX 2000-06-22 128.75 0284800 LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ON 2000-06-22 6.00 0284801 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 2000-06-22 2,994.70 0284802 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 2000-06-22 175.01 0284803 MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES 2000-06-22 119.33 0284804 MICROFORMS MANAGEMENT CORP 2000-06-22 784.90 0284805 MIKES GARAGE 2000-06-22 100.00 0284806 MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS 2000-06-22 278.98 0284807 MUNICIPAL CODE CORP 2000-06-22 1,540.02 0284808 MATRX MEDICAL REPAIR CTR 2000-06-22 644.77 0284809 MICRO WAREHOUSE 2000-06-22 109.94 0284810 MERCURY TECHNOLOGIES 2000-06-22 658.94 0284811 MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM 2000-06-22 1,392.30 0284812 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 2000-06-22 34.60 0284813 MARC INDUSTRIES 2000-06-22 211.30 0284814 MICKLE, VALERIE 2000-06-22 120.62 0284815 MEDCHECK 2000-06-22 222.68 0284816 MOSS, MARY 2000-06-22 18.03 0284817 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC 2000-06-22 240.00 0284818 MARTIN, CRISTI 2000-06-22 52.50 0284819 MONTGOMERY TECHNOLOGY, INC 2000-06-22 904.00 0284820 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO -CONTROL 2000-06-22 20,366.21 0284821 MATHESON, EDWARD G, ESQ 2000-06-22 3,500.00 0284822 MPI NET 2000-06-22 50.85 0284823 MURICO, TINA 2000-06-22 23.18 0284824 MCVAY VOCATIONAL SERVICES, INC 2000-06-22 4,200.00 0284825 MAKING, EARL & HELEN 2000-06-22 369.18 0284826 MEREDITH BOOKS 2000-06-22 7.98 0284827 NACD LEAGUE CITY 2000-06-22 9.91 0284828 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 2000-06-22 70.71 0284829 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 2000-06-22 15,465.16 0284830 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO 2000-06-22 23.70 0284831 NATIONAL FIRE AND SAFETY 2000-06-22 20.00 0284832 NORTRAX EQUIPMENT COMPANY 2000-06-22 1,116.13 0284833 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2000-06-22 1,229.85 0284834 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 2000-06-22 2,545.89 0284835 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 2000-06-22 9,364.94 0284836 ORLANDO, KAREN M 2000-06-22 329.00 0284837 OGONOSKI, ROBERT 2000-06-22 160.01 0284838 OHLINGER, HAROLD E 2000-06-22 369.80 0284839 PARKS RENTAL INC 2000-06-22 556.31 0284840 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC 2000-06-22 37.66 0284841 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2000-06-22 190.00 0284842 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2000-06-22 203.36 0284843 PHILLIPS, LINDA R 2000-06-22 105.00 0284844 POST, LORRAINE M 2000-06-22 196.02 0284845 POSTMASTER 2000-06-22 330.00 0284846 POSTMASTER 2000-06-22 10,000.00 JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG 030 -14- 0 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284847 P G A NATIONAL RESORT & SPA 2000-06-22 84.00 0284848 PETTY CASH 2000-06-22 41.06 0284849 PROFESSIONAL TITLE OF 2000-06-22 6,218.19 0284850 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 2000-06-22 319.61 0284851 POSTMASTER 2000-06-22 132.00 0284852 PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE 2000-06-22 140.50 0284853 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2000-06-22 92.00 0284854 PALM BEACH TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 2000-06-22 63.82 0284855 FMX MEDICAL 2000-06-22 1,386.96 0284856 PARKER, DEBBIE 2000-06-22 90.13 0284857 PROSPER, JANET C 2000-06-22 73.50 0284858 PROFORMA 2000-06-22 175.00 0284859 PREVELIGE, MARY 2000-06-22 1,250.00 0284860 QUALITY BOOKS, INC 2000-06-22 733.97 0284861 QUALITY INN 2000-06-22 276.00 0284862 ROSELAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT 2000-06-22 14.00 0284863 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC 2000-06-22 634.16 0284864 RECORDED BOOKS INC 2000-06-22 453.60 0284865 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 2000-06-22 8.75 0284866 ROYAL CUP COFFEE 2000-06-22 137.60 0284867 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 2000-06-22 764.00 0284868 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2000-06-22 169.27 0284869 RIVERSIDE LEASING CO 2000-06-22 614.00 0284870 REEF PLUMBING INC 2000-06-22 107.00 0284871 SCOTTY'S, INC 2000-06-22 5.55 0284872 SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC 2000-06-22 20.88 0284873 SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT 2000-06-22 94.00 0284874 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC 2000-06-22 64,27 0284875 SMART CORPORATION 2000-06-22 99.50 0284876 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 2000-06-22 426.65 0284877 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2000-06-22 6.09 0284878 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC 2000-06-22 238.90 0284879 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC 2000-06-22 192.50 0284880 SAFESPACE INC 2000-06-22 1,250.00 0284881 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY 2000-06-22 309.60 0284882 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 2000-06-22 750.00 0284883 SPALDING 2000-06-22 137.34 0284884 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC 2000-06-22 1,550.02 0284885 SELIG CHEMICAL IND 2000-06-22 105.91 0284886 SALEM PRESS, INC 2000-06-22 121.00 0284887 SUPERIOR PRINTING 2000-06-22 3,059.15 0284888 SPEEGLE CONSTRUCTION, INC 2000-06-22 37,518.21 0284889 SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC 2000-06-22 222.34 0284890 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO 2000-06-22 51.58 0284891 SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL 2000-06-22 708.47 0284892 SPILLIS CANDELA & PARTNERS,INC 2000-06-22 215.66 0284893 SEARS SIDING & WINDOWS 2000-06-22 31.00 0284894 SECURITY FIRST TITLE PARTNERS 2000-06-22 369.18 0284895 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-06-22 60.00 0284896 SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA 2000-06-22 1,044.00 0284897 SEGAL, BARRY PA 2000-06-22 369.18 0284898 TARMAC AMERICA INC 2000-06-22 165.00 0284899 THOMAS, DEBBY L 2000-06-22 178.50 0284900 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 2000-06-22 39,959.41 0284901 THOMSON LEARNING 2000-06-22 53.26 0284902 TRANS PARTS CENTER OF SOUTH 2000-06-22 92.49 0284903 TRAFFIC PARTS, INC 2000-06-22 21,964.75 0284904 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2000-06-22 756.00 0284905 SMITH, TERRY L 2000-06-22 47.91 0284906 TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOOK CLUB 2000-06-22 268.60 0284907 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-06-22 355.26 0284908 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-06-22 402.09 JULY 119 2000 Bl% I 1 4 PG 0 31 -15- • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284909 TREASURE COAST SAFETY COUNCIL 2000-06-22 0284910 UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA 2000-06-22 25.00 0284911 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 2000-06-22 44.58 0284912 UNIVERSAL LAND TITLE INC 2000-06-22 2,149.20 0284913 VERO BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE 2000-06-22 922.95 0284914 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-06-22 11.00 5,243.20 0284915 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC 2000-06-22 0284916 VERO MARINE CENTER, INC 2000-06-22 234.73 0284917 VERO LAKE ESTATES VOLUNTEER 2000-06-22 36.65 0284918 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-06-22 18.00 0284919 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 2000-06-22 50.00 0284920 VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN 2000-06-22 25.00 0284921 VERO HERITAGE INC 55.39 0284922 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-06-22 959.44 0284923 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-06-22 1,128.03 0284924 WIGINTON FIRE SPRINKLERS,INC 2000-06-22 229,42 0284925 WILLHOFF, PATSY 2000-06-22 1,400.00 0284926 WALKERS GLEN WEST LTD 2000-06-22 2000-06-22 78.00 0284927 WEST, JEFF 500.00 0284928 WRAP N' SHIP 2000-06-22 69.00 2000-06-22 243.48 0284929 WASTE MANAGEMENT 2000-06-22 86,844.12 0284930 WILSON, SUSAN BARNES 2000-06-22 270.38 0284931 WILSON, STEVEN 2000-06-22 118.45 0284932 WENDEHAKE, JOHN C 2000-06-22 67.96 0284933 XEROX CORPORATION 2000-06-22 94.71 0284934 YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC 2000-06-22 92.52 0284935 YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 2000-06-22 587.00 0284936 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 2000-06-22 50.85 0284937 MILLER, JOSEPH 2000-06-22 601.92 0284938 CANTLON, PAULA 2000-06-22 331.52 0284939 SCHILL, LARRY 2000-06-22 484.34 0284940 MERCURI, DEBRA 2000-06-22 486.14 0284941 STEWART, LINDA AND 2000-06-22 212.86 0284942 ROYAL, THOMAS 2000-06-22 478.90 0284943 MARSIGLIA, VICTOR 2000-06-22 25.88 0284944 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 2000-06-22 237.91 0284945 WINDSOR PROPERTIES 2000-06-22 82.43 0284946 TALLMAN, DICK 2000-06-22 32.18 0284947 STEWART, DAVID 2000-06-22 38.11 0284948 STAUBER III, WALTER J 2000-06-22 31.78 0284949 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2000-06-22 199.41 0284950 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION 2000-06-22 42.06 0284951 WEBB, MARGARET 2000-06-22 39.95 0284952 JONES, DOROTHY & STERLING 2000-06-22 60.38 0284953 ELLIOTT, LESLIE W 2000-06-22 89.68 0284954 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2000-06-22 40.13 0284955 ANDD BUILDING CORP 2000-06-22 21.25 0284956 BROWN, JANE M 2000-06-22 85.56 0284957 FASHIONS OF SEVENTH AVE 2000-06-22 48.09 0284958 OGONOSKI, JOHN C 2000-06-22 34.99 0284959 BELFORD, CHERYL L 2000-06-22 8.40 0284960 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2000-06-22 36.98 0284961 BROGNANO, DANIEL J 2000-06-22 36.78 0284962 PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION 2000-06-22 40.79 0284963 GREBLICK, JAMES J 2000-06-22 26.76 0284964 COTTER, BARBARA 2000-06-22 16.69 0284965 WISEMAN, JOANNE 2000-06-22 9.87 0284966 BREWER, SHERRIE DEE 2000-06-22 54.67 0284967 CARTER, JOHN M & MICHELLE 2000-06-22 13.15 0284968 FLORES, REBECCA 2000-06-22 62.64 0284969 MOYER, KELLY & AMy 2000-06-22 70.37 0284970 SCHWARTZ, JAY 2000-06-22 7.38 JULY 119 2000 8K 6 14 PG 032 -16- • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0284971 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 2000-06-22 72.10 0284972 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 2000-06-22 39.40 0284973 EATON, THOMAS J 2000-06-22 75.06 0284974 MC CANN, MARK 2000-06-22 31.00 0284975 EDWARDS, LEONARD 2000-06-22 72.29 0284976 BRIDGES, ROBERT L 2000-06-22 58.16 0284977 HODGE, DAVID 2000-06-22 1.03 0284978 FORD, BRYCE L & DONNA ANN 2000-06-22 77.09 0284979 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR LTD 2000-06-22 176.05 0284980 CROSBY, THOMAS G 2000-06-22 16.51 0284981 KAHLER, WILLIAM L 2000-06-22 85.69 0284982 GUTHRO, KATHLEEN L 2000-06-22 69.69 0284983 ADAMS, PAUL L 2000-06-22 33.83 0284984 LOBSTER SHANTY 2000-06-22 6.16 0284985 SHEARL, STEVE 2000-06-22 25.99 0284986 SABONJOHN, PETER 2000-06-22 57.50 0284987 REXFORD BUILDERS 2000-06-22 43.18 0284988 BRANDON CAPITAL CORP 2000-06-22 150.02 0284989 KAY, JEAN M 2000-06-22 32.60 0284990 FULTZ, GERALD A 2000-06-22 36.72 0284991 BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION CO 2000-06-22 40.11 0284992 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 2000-06-22 85.61 0284993 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 2000-06-22 39.98 0284994 GARONE, JOSEPH 2000-06-22 46.06 0284995 STEART, DAVID 2000-06-22 48.48 0284996 SORENSEN, ELIZABETH 2000-06-22 42.51 0284997 GHA, GRAND HARBOR LTD 2000-06-22 73.76 0284998 ALTMAN, JASON D 2000-06-22 31.41 0284999 CENTURY 21 SEA TREK 2000-06-22 81.92 0285000 COUNTRYSIDE N MOBILE HOME PARK 2000-06-22 43.81 0285001 CHAMBLISS, HEATHER 2000-06-22 35.06 0285002 MAULFAIR, RICHARD 2000-06-22 61.62 0285003 GHO VERO BEACH INC 2000-06-22 43.55 0285004 CUMMINS, FRANK E 2000-06-22 49.24 0285005 SIGHTS BY CEIL 2000-06-22 46.85 0285006 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2000-06-22 54.27 0285007 BRUGGER, GUSTAV 2000-06-22 68.30 0285008 MC COLLUM, CHARLES & LARUE 2000-06-22 64.66 0285009 BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA INC 2000-06-22 32.98 0285010 MEADE, EDWIN A 2000-06-22 20.60 0285011 R MAX OF IR INC 2000-06-22 37.97 0285012 SMITH, RANDAL 2000-06-22 39.29 0285013 TREASURE COAST BUILDERS 2000-06-22 70.76 0285014 RIVERA, OLIVER 2000-06-22 7.29 0285015 BRAMLETT, GERALD 2000-06-22 17.33 0285016 RIMER, DARLENE 2000-06-22 45.18 0285017 SCOTT, MARK B 2000-06-22 12.45 0285018 MORAVEC, LORETTA A 2000-06-22 49.18 0285019 HINZMAN, FRANK D 2000-06-22 33.16 0285020 STUNDA, JUDITH A 2000-06-22 45.63 0285021 KUKASKY, GERALD W 2000-06-22 42.69 0285022 MORAN, PATRICK 2000-06-22 77.35 0285023 KEMP, ROBYN 2000-06-22 3.31 0285024 MARTINDALE, ANY 2000-06-22 53.33 0285025 SHAW, JOSEPH & MARY ANN 2000-06-22 5.23 0285026 DEWIJS, KRISTI 2000-06-22 56.68 0285027 JACOBSEN, ROBERT L 2000-06-22 53.22 0285028 WRIGHT, JANET L 2000-06-22 47.11 0285029 STEVENSON, ROBERT J & JEAN 2000-06-22 25.04 0285030 MANOTAS, RAFAEL 2000-06-22 34.32 0285031 BAER, MARY ALICE 2000-06-22 25.96 JULY 119 2000 O 1} 4 PG 0 3 3 -17- • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0285032 DE LEON, CESAR & ELISA 2000-06-22 44.94 0285033 GUNNING, MELAINEY 2000-06-22 71.16 0285034 DASSOW, JESSICA 2000-06-22 28.24 0285035 LANGEBRO, HAKAN 2000-06-22 27.97 0285036 FAILLA, CHRIS 2000-06-22 29.70 0285037 SANDERSON, FREDA & MARK 2000-06-22 81.82 0285038 CAMP, JOHN W 2000-06-22 38.23 0285039 WHEELER, DONNA 2000-06-22 17.70 0285040 DECATES, JOHN T 2000-06-22 78.40 0285041 STEPHEN FIELDS CO INC 2000-06-22 15.16 0285042 GARNER, LEAH & JASON 2000-06-22 7.24 0285043 LEWIS, GENE R 2000-06-22 12.11 0285044 GOULIAN, MARTIN RICHARD 2000-06-22 70.43 0285045 DUGAN, PAUL P & JULIE M 2000-06-22 71.44 0285046 BODIFORD, SONYA 2000-06-22 57.72 0285047 SELIG, CHERYL 2000-06-22 14.47 0285048 DEMEREST, ANNE D 2000-06-22 15.51 0285049 DIXON, JEFF 2000-06-22 27.79 0285050 SERAYDARIAN, ELIZABETH 2000-06-22 19.66 0285051 FRITSCHI, SUSAN 2000-06-22 61.44 0285052 THOMAS, LETTICIA 2000-06-22 38.31 0285053 CARMEL, KERRY 2000-06-22 31.86 0285054 SCHERPF, JOSEPH & CYNTHIA 2000-06-22 75.01 0285055 RAPPEL, JAMES S 2000-06-22 62.52 0285056 SINDART IMPORTS 2000-06-22 65.40 0285057 GIBSON, AUSTIN 2000-06-22 78.70 0285058 POOL, WYLLYS L 2000-06-22 36.95 0285059 KELLY, SHAWN 2000-06-22 60.13 0285060 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION, INC 2000-06-22 156.90 0285061 BERTOCCHI, ALFRED M 2000-06-22 72.29 0285062 ZAMARRIPA, RAUL 2000-06-22 79.82 0285063 HART JR, HARRY 2000-06-22 29.01 0285064 CRONIN, JANIS 2000-06-22 18.28 0285065 CORDARO, REBECCA 2000-06-22 22.97 0285066 MC RAE, GORDON 2000-06-22 80.06 0285067 ANDERSON, FRED 2000-06-23 194.00 0285068 BROSTON, LYDIA 2000-06-23 224.00 0285069 BEUTTELL, PETER M 2000-06-23 284.00 0285070 SILKEN GROUP 2000-06-23 1,166.00 0285071 BEANS, ROBERT 2000-06-23 69.00 0285072 BROOKS, DONNA AND CITY OF VERO 2000-06-23 46.00 0285073 BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2000-06-23 281.00 0285074 BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H 2000-06-23 308.00 0285075 BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF 2000-06-23 358.22 0285076 BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY 2000-06-23 1,278.44 0285077 BURGESS, TANGELA AND 2000-06-23 42.00 0285078 CORR, RHODA L 2000-06-23 251.00 0285079 CENTURY 21 SEATREK REALTY, INC 2000-06-23 286.00 0285080 C P E ASSOCIATES 2000-06-23 1,499.00 0285081 CAPAK, GERALD T 2000-06-23 421.00 0285082 CLUNN, JEFFREY 2000-06-23 341.00 0285083 CARONE, PAUL 2000-06-23 268.00 0285084 COASTAL ESCROW SERVICES, INC 2000-06-23 117.00 0285085 CARLUCCI, LEONARD A 2000-06-23 366.00 0285086 DOOLITTLE JAMES A & ASSOCIATES 2000-06-23 3,823.00 0285087 DOVE, E WILSON 2000-06-23 366.00 0285088 DOYLE, CHERYL 2000-06-23 301.00 0285089 EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113) 2000-06-23 385.00 0285090 EDWARD, FRANKLIN 2000-06-23 327.00 0285091 FOGERTY, GEORGE A 2000-06-23 353.00 0285092 FRESH, DANIEL J 2000-06-23 274.00 JULY 11, 2000 BK 1! 4 PG 034 34 C] CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0285093 FT PIERCE, CITY OF 2000-06-23 3,191.32 0285094 FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC 2000-06-23 419.00 0285095 FORD, ROBERT J 2000-06-23 287.00 0285096 GASKILL, ROBERT 2000-06-23 249.00 0285097 GIFFORD GROVES, LTD 2000-06-23 9,392.00 0285098 GRACE'S LANDING LTD 2000-06-23 3,845.00 0285099 HOLM, LEO 2000-06-23 469.00 0285100 HUNLEY, J MICHAEL 2000-06-23 414.00 0285101 JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES 2000-06-23 4,902.00 0285102 JAHOLKOWSKI, PAUL J REVOCABLE 2000-06-23 322.00 0285103 JAHOLKOWSKI, MIKE 2000-06-23 245.00 0285104 JULIN, PAUL 2000-06-23 170.00 0285105 JOHNSTON, PATTIE 2000-06-23 391.00 0285106 JACKOWSKI, MICHAEL 2000-06-23 309.00 0285107 JONES, ALPHONSO 2000-06-23 255.00 0285108 KOLB, GREGORY L - DECEASED 2000-06-23 438.00 0285109 KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA 2000-06-23 241.00 0285110 KISSIMMEE, CITY OF 2000-06-23 304.22 0285111 LAWRENCE, TERRY A 2000-06-23 185.00 0285112 LLERENA, E D 2000-06-23 337.00 0285113 LANGLEY, PHILIP G 2000-06-23 239.00 0285114 L & S MANAGEMENT 2000-06-23 179.00 0285115 LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS 2000-06-23 8,115.00 0285116 MIXELL, LLONALD AND/OR 2000-06-23 380.00 0285117 M O D INVESTMENTS 2000-06-23 979.00 0285118 MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM 2000-06-23 203.00 0285119 MALGERIA, PRISCILLA 2000-06-23 419.00 0285120 MORRILL, TINA AND CITY OF 2000-06-23 31.00 0285121 MULLINS, B FRANK 2000-06-23 587.00 0285122 MC CLAY, ROBIN 2000-06-23 166.00 0285123 MCGRIFF, SHARON AND CITY OF 2000-06-23 26.00 0285124 MEAD, THOMAS H OR HELEN S 2000-06-23 244.00 0285125 NORMAN, DOUGLAS OR BARBARA 2000-06-23 337.00 0285126 ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND 2000-06-23 613.22 0285127 ORLANDO HOUSING AUTHORITY 2000-06-23 732.22 0285128 PALMER TRAILER PARK 2000-06-23 267.00 0285129 PITTMAN, CATHERINE & FLORIDA 2000-06-23 34.00 0285130 POLLY, EMMA 2000-06-23 763.00 0285131 PIERSON, JOHN H DBA 2000-06-23 318.00 0285132 PALUMBO, LOUIS 2000-06-23 343.00 0285133 PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF 2000-06-23 486.22 0285134 PRYOR, VALERIE AND CITY OF 2000-06-23 72.00 0285135 REAGAN, WILLIE C 2000-06-23 354.00 0285136 RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST 2000-06-23 245.00 0285137 RODRIGUEZ, BLANCA 2000-06-23 274.00 0285138 RICOTTI, RICARDO 2000-06-23 317.00 0285139 RIVER PARK PLACE 2000-06-23 3,616.00 0285140 ST FRANCIS MANOR 2000-06-23 2,453.00 0285141 SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS 2000-06-23 322.00 0285142 SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR 2000-06-23 245.00 0285143 STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY 2000-06-23 487.22 0285144 SANDY PINES 2000-06-23 4,081.00 0285145 SHELTON, ROBERT L 2000-06-23 423.00 0285146 STARCK, MICHAEL R 2000-06-23 329.00 0285147 STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR 2000-06-23 267.00 0285148 SUNDMAN, IVAN 2000-06-23 333.00 0285149 STIMELING, PAUL B OR MARGARET 2000-06-23 217.00 0285150 SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA 2000-06-23 265.00 0285151 TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING 2000-06-23 476.00 0285152 TORRES, HARRY 2000-06-23 565.00 0285153 TUMLIN, TRACY N 2000-06-23 252.00 JULY 119 2000 -19- Bl% 114 FG 0 3 5 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0285154 TEDDIE TRUST, THE 2000-06-23 581.00 0285155 VERO MOBILE HOME PARK 2000-06-23 337.00 0285156 VERO FIRST CORPORATION 2000-06-23 1,517.00 0285157 BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN) 2000-06-23 280.00 0285158 WILLIAMS, TOBIAS M 2000-06-23 397.00 0285159 WILLIAMS, DEBRA WASHINGTON 2000-06-23 160.00 0285160 WILLIAMS, EDITH 2000-06-23 270.00 0285161 YORK, LILLY B 2000-06-23 189.00 0285162 YORK, DAVID 2000-06-23 367.00 0285163 ZANCA, LEONARD 2000-06-23 622.00 1,308,645.29 7.D, LIST OF WARRANTS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 29,,2000: To: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JUNE 29, 2000 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of June 28, 2000 to June 29, 2000. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued by the Clerk to the Board for June 28, 2000 through June 29, 2000, as recommended by staff. JULY 119 2000 -20- Int 114 PG 036 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020626 FLORIDA COMBINED LIFE 2000-06-28 2,741.46 0020627 THE GUARDIAN 2000-06-28 9,300.28 0020628 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 2000-06-28 4,070.01 0020629 UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER CTY 2000-06-28 2,486.68 0020630 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 2000-06-28 1,136.00 0266294 SUPER X 1999-07-22 .00 VOID 0273316 BRODART CO 1999-11-30 .00 VOID 0277073 BARTON, JEFFREY K 2000-02-10 .00 VOID 0282597 TUCKER, TARA REED 2000 -OS -11 .00 VOID 0284276 CROON CONSTRUCTION CO 2000-06-08 .00 VOID 0284485 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2000-06-15 ..00 VOID 0284535 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2000-06-15 .00 VOID 0285164 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-06-29 606.25 0285165 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2000-06-29 961.40 0285166 ALCALDE, RENATO MD 2000-06-29 50.00 0285167 ALEXANDER BATTERY COMPANY 2000-06-29 902.88 0285168 AMERICAN BUSINESS INTERIORS 2000-06-29 2,466.46 0285169 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 2000-06-29 1,460.50 0285170 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 2000-06-29 1,944.22 0285171 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO 2000-06-29 757.88 0285172 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2000-06-29 163.02 0285173 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 2000-06-29 1,478.03 0285174 ABS PUMPS, INC 2000-06-29 1,334.96 0285175 AQUAGENIX LAND -WATER 2000-06-29 105.00 0285176 AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE 2000-06-29 724.51 0285177 ASHBROOK CORPORATION 2000-06-29 2,248.57 0285178 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000-06-29 506.00 0285179 ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO 2000-06-29 115.89 0285180 ADVANCE MARKING SYSTEMS 2000-06-29 72.23 0285181 AQUATECHNIQUES INCORPORATED 2000-06-29 2,500.00 0285182 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC 2000-06-29 822.90 0285183 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS 2000-06-29 168.14 0285184 ADVANCED MICROSYSTEMS, INC 2000-06-29 585.00 0285185 ALUMINUM & GLASS 2000-06-29 1,483.00 0285186 AMERISYS, INC 2000-06-29 95.20 0285187 AMERICAN WATER CHEMICALS, INC 2000-06-29 7,854.08 0285188 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND 2000-06-29 49,859.79 0285189 ANCOR CORP INC. 2000-06-29 154.80 0285190 ATLANTIC ORTHOPAEDIC GROUP 2000-06-29 31.00 0285191 ABC PRINTING CO 2000-06-29 1,960.68 0285192 ALL CLEAR LOCATING SERVICES 2000-06-29 1,201.70 0285193 B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 2000-06-29 428.47 0285194 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2000-06-29 469.43 0285195 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 2000-06-29 3,143.96 0285196 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2000-06-29 2,081.26 0285197 BREVARD RENTALS, INC 2000-06-29 295.02 0285198 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 2000-06-29 201,159.50 0285199 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 2000-06-29 5,138.97 0285200 BARTON, JEFFREY K 2000-06-29 6,870.75 0285201 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2000-06-29 1,612.86 0285202 BRODART CO 2000-06-29 3,431.16 0285203 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION 2000-06-29 54.31 0285204 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 2000-06-29 572.37 0285205 BEAZER HOMES, INC 2000-06-29 24.00 0285206 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-06-29 16,640.38 0285207 BELLSOUTH 2000-06-29 379.43 0285208 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2000-06-29 420.78 0285209 BREVARD REHABILITATION MED 2000-06-29 451.00 0285210 BUZA, PAUL W DO 2000-06-29 26.10 0285211 BIG SKY PHOTOGRAPHY 2000-06-29 35.00 0285212 BRYANT, JAMES O JR 2000-06-29 240.00 JULY 119 2000 -21- B 114 PG 037 CJ CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0285213 BCC/FWPCOA TRAINING 2000-06-29 390.00 0285214 BELLSOUTH 2000-06-29 307.25 0285215 CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY 2000-06-29 71.50 0285216 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC 2000-06-29 12.79 0285217 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 2000-06-29 21.00 0285218 COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC 2000-06-29 49.95 0285219 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 2000-06-29 142.72 0285220 CONTROL SPECIALISTS CO 2000-06-29 3,260.72 0285221 CHANDLER, JAMES E 2000-06-29 74.58 0285222 COMPUTER SHOPPER 2000-06-29 24.97 0285223 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 2000-06-29 8,238.89 0285224 CLINIC PHARMACY 2000-06-29 254.58 0285225 CROSS CREEK APPAREL, INC 2000-06-29 264.39 0285226 CASANO, F V ELECTRICAL 2000-06-29 30.00 0285227 CUES, INC 2000-06-29 698.69 0285228 CLIFFORD, MIKE 2000-06-29 100.00 0285229 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT 2000-06-29 65.00 0285230 CSR AMERICA, INC. 2000-06-29 40.09 0285231 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2000-06-29 199.50 0285232 CORVEL 2000-06-29 258.74 0285233 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN 2000-06-29 4,485.15 0285234 CIGARS UNLIMITED 2000-06-29 133.28 0285235 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2000-06-29 1,844.12 0285236 CARGILL INC -SALT DIVISION 2000-06-29 1,138.56 0285237 COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC & 2000-06-29 29.00 0285238 COLUMBIA PROPANE 2000-06-29 119.58 0285239 CENTER POINT PUBLISHING 2000-06-29 9.00 0285240 COCHRANE ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT 2000-06-29 83.57 0285241 CLARION HOTEL 2000-06-29 359.70 0285242 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 2000-06-29 616.44 0285243 DAVES SPORTING GOODS 2000-06-29 308.89 0285244 DAVIS, JAMES 2000-06-29 209.75 0285245 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2000-06-29 560.65 0285246 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2000-06-29 3,011.65 0285247 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC 2000-06-29 2,373.55 0285248 DOCTOR'S CLINIC 2000-06-29 613.00 0285249 DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC 2000-06-29 360.97 0285250 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 2000-06-29 166.73 0285251 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2000-06-29 5,750.00 0285252 DADE PAPER COMPANY 2000-06-29 238.88 0285253 DAVIS, BRENDA 2000-06-29 14.21 0285254 DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC 2000-06-29 39.80 0285255 E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC 2000-06-29 47.50 0285256 ERRETT, NANCY 2000-06-29 77.42 0285257 ERCILDOUNE BOWLING LANES 2000-06-29 225.00 0285258 EXPEDITER INC, THE 2000-06-29 47.71 0285259 EDGEWOOD INVESTIGATIONS INC 2000-06-29 950.00 0285260 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC 2000-06-29 4,925.65 0285261 EUCLID PRODUCTS CO 2000-06-29 81.29 0285262 FATHER & SON APPLIANCE CO 2000-06-29 192.50 0285263 FEDEX 2000-06-29 163.60 0285264 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2000-06-29 176.97 0285265 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO 2000-06-29 725.00 0285266 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2000-06-29 14,024.28 0285267 FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING 2000-06-29 4,663.00 0285268 FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL 2000-06-29 60.00 0285269 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2000-06-29 60.94 0285270 FRANKLIN PRODUCTS CORP 2000-06-29 721.02 0285271 FLORIDA SECTION A W W A 2000-06-29 89.00 0285272 FALZONE, KATHY 2000-06-29 85.84 0285273 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-06-29 25.00 0285274 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2000-06-29 500.00 JULY 119 2000 -22- BK 114 PG 038 i • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0285275 FACTICON, INC 2000-06-29 900.00 0285276 FACTS ON FILE INC 2000-06-29 2,004.00 0285277 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2000-06-29 251.90 0285278 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2000-06-29 787.68 0285279 FIRST COAST SERVICE OPTIONS 2000-06-29 825.94 0285280 FLEMMING, ANTONIC 2000-06-29 494.41 0285281 FOSTER, JANNA GRACE 2000-06-29 51.50 0285282 FROST, CORRINE 2000-06-29 58.00 0285283 FULLER, APRIL L 2000-06-29 39.92 0285284 FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL 2000-06-29 25.00 0285285 GALE GROUP, THE 2000-06-29 1,228.27 0285286 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY 2000-06-29 5.28 0285287 GENERAL GMC, TRUCK 2000-06-29 162.00 0285288 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 2000-06-29 124.92 0285289 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2000-06-29 104.19 0285290 GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY 2000-06-29 133.54 0285291 GALL'S INC 2000-06-29 79.99 0285292 GULF ICE SYSTEMS, INC 2000-06-29 3,296.00 0285293 GREENE, ROBERT E 2000-06-29 1,956.77 0285294 GINN, CAROLINE D 2000-06-29 28.08 0285295 GLOBAL DIRECTORIES, THE 2000-06-29 187.00 0285296 HIGHSMITH, INC 2000-06-29 5.00 0285297 HUDMAN ENTERPRISES 2000-06-29 500.00 0285298 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2000-06-29 380.20 0285299 HERITAGE QUEST 2000-06-29 202.81 0285300 HACH COMPANY 2000-06-29 194.85 0285301 HILL MANUFACTURING 2000-06-29 773.55 0285302 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2000-06-29 236.50 0285303 HOLIDAY INN 2000-06-29 650.00 0285304 HOLMES, EDWARD 2000-06-29 240.00 0285305 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-06-29 67,167.82 0285306 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-06-29 59,092.00 0285307 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-06-29 25.00 0285308 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC 2000-06-29 380.00 0285309 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 2000-06-29 649.40 0285310 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2000-06-29 482.60 0285311 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2000-06-29 5,011.42 0285312 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2000-06-29 504.28 0285313 ISIS PUBLISHING 2000-06-29 58.46 0285314 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2000-06-29 1,001.49 0285315 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-06-29 25.00 0285316 INTERIM PERSONNEL 2000-06-29 408.00 0285317 INTEL GROUP, THE 2000-06-29 660.00 0285318 IMI -NET, INC 2000-06-29 450.00 0285319 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2000-06-29 768.00 0285320 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S 2000-06-29 75.00 0285321 INTERISK CORPORATION 2000-06-29 2,397.09 0285322 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2000-06-29 524.03 0285323 J C PENNEY 2000-06-29 70.00 0285324 JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS 2000-06-29 400.00 0285325 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 2000-06-29 29.10 0285326 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2000-06-29 611.95 0285327 JEWETT ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC 2000-06-29 41.40 0285328 JOHNSON, ANSELMO, MURDOCK, 2000-06-29 9,774.07 0285329 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 2000-06-29 957.00 0285330 KELLY TRACTOR CO 2000-06-29 1,116.24 0285331 KURTZ, ERIC C MD 2000-06-29 1,200.00 0285332 KRUGER, INC 2000-06-29 22,079.00 0285333 KING, JOHN A 2000-06-29 8.90 0285334 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC 2000-06-29 260.45 0285335 LEISURE ARTS, INC 2000-06-29 29.91 JULY 119 2000 -23- BK 1 1 4 PG 0 3 9 Fr - CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0285336 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2000-06-29 780.67 0285337 L B SMITH, INC 2000-06-29 146.94 0285338 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2000-06-29 163.50 0285339 LESCO, INC 2000-06-29 157.15 0285340 LUNDMARK, ALEX 2000-06-29 404.29 0285341 MARPAN SUPPLY COMPANY, INC 2000-06-29 432.00 0285342 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 2000-06-29 168.48 0285343 MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY 2000-06-29 12.00 0285344 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2000-06-29 17,265.41 0285345 MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC 2000-06-29 16.95 0285346 MIRES GARAGE 2000-06-29 95.00 0285347 MUNICIPAL CODE CORP 2000-06-29 40.69 0285348 MIAMI HERALD, THE 2000-06-29 104.25 0285349 MAC PAPERS, INC 2000-06-29 69.20 0285350 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 2000-06-29 276.30 0285351 MILNER BUSINESS PRODUCTS 2000-06-29 205.00 0285352 MAEGLIN, JERRY & NORA L 2000-06-29 19.05 0285353 MOSBY 2000-06-29 626.66 0285354 MCDONALD, ROBERT D D S 2000-06-29 3,000.00 0285355 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2000-06-29 15.99 0285356 MAGNETHERAPY, INC 2000-06-29 59.89 0285357 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 2000-06-29 34.60 0285358 MARC INDUSTRIES 2000-06-29 80.32 0285359 MICKLE, VALERIE 2000-06-29 117.81 0285360 MCKAY, NANCY 2000-06-29 3,733.30 0285361 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2000-06-29 500.00 0285362 MEYER, NORMAN MD 2000-06-29 71.40 0285363 MURPHY, DEBBIE 2000-06-29 174.00 0285364 MAXWELL, KIMBERLY 2000-06-29 34.77 0285365 MPI NET 2000-06-29 101.70 0285366 NOLTE, DAVID C 2000-06-29 185,816.49 0285367 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO 2000-06-29 1,500.00 0285368 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO 2000-06-29 34.01 0285369 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION 2000-06-29 219.20 0285370 NEWLINE PUBLISHING 2000-06-29 294.89 0285371 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2000-06-29 1,169.23 0285372 OMNIGRAPHICS, INC 2000-06-29 36.30 0285373 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 2000-06-29 31.61 0285374 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 2000-06-29 3,462.99 0285375 OSCEOLA PHARMACY 2000-06-29 27.75 0285376 OFFICE MAX 2000-06-29 23.97 0285377 O'BRIEN, DAVID MD 2000-06-29 24.65 0285378 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 2000-06-29 9,364.94 0285379 P C MAGAZINE 2000-06-29 49.97 0285380 PEABODY HOTEL, THE 2000-06-29 308.00 0285381 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2000-06-29 75.96 0285382 PETTY CASH 2000-06-29 166.90 0285383 POST, LORRAINE M 2000-06-29 86.37 0285384 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION 2000-06-29 1,000.00 0285385 PETTY CASH 2000-06-29 256.61 0285386 PETTY CASH 2000-06-29 10.89 0285387 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 2000-06-29 1,375.86 0285388 PINEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2000-06-29 66.50 0285389 PEEK TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC 2000-06-29 10,368.00 0285390 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2000-06-29 85.14 0285391 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 2000-06-29 13,182.00 0285392 P B S & J ANALYTICAL SERVICES 2000-06-29 14,550.00 0285393 PARIZA, JON 2000-06-29 500.00 0285394 QUALITY BOOKS, INC 2000-06-29 49.32 0285395 QUINN, JUNE 2000-06-29 500.00 0285396 RADIOSHACK 2000-06-29 29.99 0285397 RINGHAVER 2000-06-29 756.13 JULY 119 2000 BK ! 14 Dr. 040 -24- 0 • • • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 0285398 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 2000-06-29 18,989.79 0285399 RECORDED BOOKS INC 2000-06-29 179.40 0285400 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 2000-06-29 58.08 0285401 RAPP, PAMELA 2000-06-29 12.00 0285402 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2000-06-29 668.78 0285403 RUNGE, SUZANNE 2000-06-29 290.61 0285404 ROMANO, CHRISTINA 2000-06-29 36.05 0285405 ROYAL, THOMAS 2000-06-29 111.36 0285406 RASMUSSEN, KARA 2000-06-29 157.08 0285407 RICHARDSON, BEN 2000-06-29 182.00 0285408 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 2000-06-29 150.00 0285409 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE 2000-06-29 4,534.25 0285410 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 2000-06-29 221.55 0285411 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2000-06-29 120.55 0285412 SOUTHERN PINE LUMBER CO 2000-06-29 5,540.15 0285413 STATE ATTORNEY 19TH CIRCUIT 2000-06-29 12,975.27 0285414 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 2000-06-29 100.46 0285415 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2000-06-29 119.70 0285416 STEIL, HOLLY 2000-06-29 60.90 0285417 SAKALAS, ROMAS MD 2000-06-29 8.00 0285418 SELIG CHEMICAL IND 2000-06-29 181.40 0285419 SOLINET 2000-06-29 323.59 0285420 SERFILOO LTD 2000-06-29 38.73 0285421 SPEEGLE CONSTRUCTION, INC 2000-06-29 2,217.78 0285422 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2000-06-29 250.37 0285423 STEVENS PRINTING 2000-06-29 221.00 0285424 SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC 2000-06-29 175.43 0285425 ST LUCIE COUNTY 2000-06-29 3,205.00 0285426 SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2000-06-29 3,053.04 0285427 STAGE & SCREEN 2000-06-29 27.65 0285428 S & S WORLDWIDE 2000-06-29 117.92 0285429 SOUTHERN PETROLEUM SYSTEMS INC 2000-06-29 46.40 0285430 SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC 2000-06-29 132,093.06 0285431 SEVERN -TRENT -AVATAR UTILITY 2000-06-29 7,880.77 0285432 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-06-29 50.00 0285433 SIMPSON, MEGAN 2000-06-29 321.88 0285434 SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA 2000-06-29 504.00 0285435 SUNGARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 2000-06-29 12,720.00 0285436 SIMOGLOU, EVANGELOS 2000-06-29 339.75 0285437 SMITH, JERRY 2000-06-29 1,800.00 0285438 STEWART, LINDA 2000-06-29 79.46 0285439 SECURITYLINK FROM AMERITECH 2000-06-29 82.50 0285440 SHELL FLEET CARD 2000-06-29 1,327.56 0285441 STEWART, SARAH LYNN 2000-06-29 38.63 0285442 SMITH, BRUCE 2000-06-29 500.00 0285443 STALHUT, SHANNON 2000-06-29 92.75 0285444 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-06-29 2,919.14 0285445 TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER 2000-06-29 4,041.38 0285446 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC 2000-06-29 3,532.29 0285447 TRAFFIC PARTS, INC 2000-06-29 1,162.50 0285448 TIPPIN, JOHN W 2000-06-29 132.84 0285449 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP, INC 2000-06-29 334.00 0285450 TRI -COUNTY CONCRETE PRODUCTS 2000-06-29 996.00 0285451 TABAR, JEFFREY 2000-06-29 155.89 0285452 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2000-06-29 75.00 0285453 TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOOK CLUB 2000-06-29 31.44 0285454 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-06-29 605.88 0285455 TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF 2000-06-29 200.00 0285456 TRADEWINDS SKATING CENTER 2000-06-29 1,974.00 0285457 T. M. D & ASSOC INC 2000-06-29 564.00 0285458 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF 2000-06-29 2,028.42 0285459 U S TELECOM, INC 2000-06-29 1,140.00 JULY 119 2000 -25- BK 114 PG 0 41 CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0285460 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 200b-06-29 36.00 0285461 UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA 2001-06-29 61.03 0285462 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 200-06-29 2,149.20 0285463 VERO BEACH LINCOLN MERCURY INC 2000-06-29 1,115.00 0285464 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-06-29 348.97 0285465 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-06-29 9,175.00 0285466 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC 2000-06-29 28.20 0285467 VIRGIL'S RADIATOR WORKS 2000-06-29 40.00 0285468 VERO BEACH COUNTRY CLUB 2000-06-29 12,037.15 0285469 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-06-29 1,683.74 0285470 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-06-29 25.00 0285471 VERO BOWL 2000-06-29 704.00 0285472 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2000-06-29 123.35 0285473 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 2000-06-29 125.00 0285474 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-06-29 631.69 0285475 W W GRAINGER, INC 2000-06-29 178.43 0285476 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-06-29 143.55 0285477 WORLD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2000-06-29 35.00 0285478 WILLIAMS, BETTY R, RN 2000-06-29 163.00 0285479 WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC 2000-06-29 210.35 0285480 WOLFE, ERIN 2000-06-29 33.48 0285481 WEISS RATINGS, INC 2000-06-29 368.95 0285482 WATERVIEW PRESS INC 2000-06-29 133.37 0285483 WALGREEN Co 2000-06-29 610.40 0285484 W C G, INC 2000-06-29 60,690.65 0285485 WILD, ANDREA 2000-06-29 180.25 0285486 WALTHER, AMELIA 2000-06-29 172.53 0285487 XEROX CORPORATION 2000-06-29 180.00 0285488 ZIEGLER, MICHAEL R 2000-06-29 95.90 1,200,729.35 JULY 11, 2000 ni, { 14 PG 042 -26- 7.E. HOMELESS TAS%FORCE - RESIGNATION OFREY. F. H. REARDON The Board reviewed a letter of June 27, 2000: ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously accepted, with regret, the resignation of Rev. F. H. Reardon from the Homeless Task Force. JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PGO 0 4 3 -27- June 27, 2000 JUIL Mr. Ken Macht, Commissioner Task Force on Homeless 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 i Dew Mr. Macht: Peace to you. I shall soon be moving from the Indian River County area for the purpose of another assignment. It would seem obvious, then, that resignation from your Task Force would be in order. I want to thank you for your wonderful direction as Chair of the Fora. Most certainly to be lauded are Mr. Stark and Mr. Van Mele, both of Holy Cross whom bave been tremendously supportive of this project. I marvel at the f 'holic Church vow ofadmmistrwdve planning and actual labor spent by Mr. Van Mele and in the short period of time in which all of this has been accomplished. Thank you for allowing me to have been a miniscule part of the process 500 Iris Lane from its inception. Perhaps my only contribution to the whole idea and the process has been prayer. What has been undertaken is not only a civil obligation, but a human and charitable one as well. I trust that my prayers Vero Beach, FL have hplp4 32963 From a Cbristi m perspective, thank you for undertaking the major task of raising the people of God to a better level of I& and helping them to form a better self image. Might the recipients of your project reflect God's (561) 231-0671 goodness to them by giving back to the community as they progress in life. Sincerely, in Him, Fax (561)234-5653 Rev. F. H. Reardon, Parochial Vicar ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously accepted, with regret, the resignation of Rev. F. H. Reardon from the Homeless Task Force. JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PGO 0 4 3 -27- 7.F. TREASURE COAST ECONOMICDEyELOPMENT DISTRICT - APPOINTMENT OF GEORGE H. HAYGOOD ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously appointed George H. Haygood, C.E.D. to the Treasure Coast Economic Development District. 7.G. SENIOR MANAGEMENT CLASSDESIGNATION- EXECUTNEAIDE TO THE BOARD -ASSISTANT COUNTYADMINISTRATOR - COVNTYATTORNEY- DEPUTY COUNTYATTORNEY The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 21, 2000: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: 11ti William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 21, 2000 SUBJECT: Senior Management Class Designation At its regular meetings on June 13th and 20th, the Board of County Commissioners approved employment contracts with the County Attomey, Deputy County Attorney, Executive Aide to the Commission and the Assistant County Administrator. Each contract called for the employee to be in the Senior Management Class of the Florida Retirement System. Florida Statute 121.055(1)(b)1.a. requires local agency employers to designate positions to be included in the Senior Management Class after publication once a week for two consecutive weeks of a "Notice of Intent" to do so. The required Notice of Intent was published in the Press Journal on June 28th and July 5th, 2000. JULY 119 2000 -2s- u BK 114P444 L I F • RECOMMENDATION: Designate the following positions for inclusion in the Senior Management Service Class of the Florida Retirement System: Executive Aide to the Commission Assistant County Administrator County Attorney Deputy County Attorney ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously designated the positions of Executive Aide to the Board, Assistant County Administrator, County Attorney and Deputy County Attorney for inclusion in the Senior Management Service Class of the Florida Retirement System, as recommended by staff. 7.H. EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL STATE GRANT AND NATIONAL CRIMINAL HISTORYIMPROVEMENT PROGRAMFOR CIRCUIT COURT - CERTIFICATE OFACCEPTANCE - DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTIY AFFAIRS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 3, 2000: JULY 119 2000 -29- BK 114 PG 045 • To: Board of County Commissioners Date: July 3, 2000 Subject: EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL STATE GRANT AND NATIONAL CRIMINAL HISTORY EMPROVE TENT PROGRAM FOR CIRCUIT COURT — CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE From: Joseph A Baird oAssistant County Administra The Board approved submission of the above grant applications at their meeting of April 18, 2000. The state has notified the County that they are being awarded the Edward Byrne Memorial State Grant in the amount of $171,404 (which requires a $57,135 match shared equally by Indian River, St. Lucie and Martin County) and the National Criminal history Improvement Program in the amount of $246,500, which does not require a match. Recommendation Authorize the Chairman to sign the Certification of Acceptance of Subgrant Award for the above mentioned grants. JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to sign the Certification of Acceptance of SubGrant Award for the Edward Byrne Memorial State Grant and National Criminal History Improvement Program for Circuit Court, as recommended by staff. CERTIFICATES OF ACCEPTANCE ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD -30- BK 114 PG 046 I • ZL DERELICT VESSEL REMOVAL PROGRAM GRANTAPPLICATION- FLORIDA FISHAND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 5, 2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners July 5, 2000 THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator SUBJECT: Submission of Derelict Vessel Removal Program Grant Application FROM: Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 11, 2000. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Derelict Vessel Removal Program Grant application deadline for removal of five (5) derelict vessels from the Indian River was June 30, 2000, therefore, staff had to proceed immediately in order to be eligible. The grant application is for $11,960. A local match is not required on this grant. RECOMMENDATION Retroactive approval of the Derelict Vessel Grant application, and authorization for the Chairman to sign all documents necessary, if requested. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, JULY 11, 2000 SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved retroactively the Derelict Vessel Grant application and authorized the Chairman to sign all documents necessary, as recommended by staff. DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED -31- N 1 i 4 PG 047 • ZJ- BELLSOUTHMOBILITYAND CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL (3955 65TH STREET TOWER) - SUB -LEASE AGREEMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 23, 2000: TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler. County Administrator FROM: Douglas M. Wright, Director of Emergency Services DATE: June 23, 2000 SUBJECT: Approval of Sub -Lease Agreement between BellSouth Mobility and Crown Castle International On October 10`", 1990, the Board of County Commissioners entered into a Lease Agreement with BellSouth Mobility, Inc., for ground space at 3955 65' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, for BellSouth to construct a communications tower and building to house communications equipment. Section 17 ofthe referenced Agreement provides that the Lease may not be sold, subleased. assigned. or transferred without the consent of the County. BellSouth has submitted a request for the — County's consent of a site sublease, wherein Crown Castle International will market the unused tower space, be responsible for tower maintenance and site upkeep, and manage all future co -locators on the BellSouth Tower. This Site Sub -Lease does not change the County's primary agreement with BellSouth Mobility. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve and consent to the Site Sublease Agreement between BellSouth Mobility, Inc., and Crown Castle International, and authorize the Chairman to execute the necessary documents. Chairman Adams questioned the fact that the letter did not discuss consideration, and Emergency Services Director Doug Wright noted that the County's contract is with BellSouth, approved in 1990, and does not provide any remuneration for co -location. The County's fees are paid through leases with the co -locator for ground space outside the fenced compound containing the tower. JULY 119 2000 8K 114 PG M • Chairman Adams then questioned the County's restrictions on canceling the leases and asked County Attorney Bangel to check the contracts for a one-year right to cancel the lease when dealing with a third party with whom we have no past history. • Commissioner Macht suggested that the matter be deferred for one week to give staff time to supply more information. CONSENSUS was reached to defer the item for one week. 7.K. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT #016 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 5, 2000: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: July 5, 2000 SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 016 THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator: FROM: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following: 1. In order to facilitate the permitting process, Engineering needs to change the vacant Civil Engineer position to a Permitting Manager. The attached entry accounts for the necessary adjustments. Funding is from Transportation Fund contingencies. 2. The Self Insurance Fund has experienced higher revenues and expenses than anticipated. The attached entry appropriates funding. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment. .nn,Y 119 2000 -33- I(�1 14 PG 049 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #016, as recommended by staff. TO: Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 016 of County Commissioners FROM: Jason E. Brown DATE: July 11. 2000 Budget Manager Entry Number Fund/D a(rtment/ Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1. EXPENSES TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Engineering/ Regular Salaries 111-244541-011.12 $918 $0 TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Engineering/ Social Security Match 111-244541-012.11 $57 $0 TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Engineering/ Retirement Contribution 111-244541-012.12 $84 $0 TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Engineering/ Workers Compensation 111-244541-012.14 $6 $0 TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Engineering/ Medicare Matching 111-244541-012.17 $13 $0 TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies 111-199-581-099.91 $0 $1,078 2. REVENUES SELF INSURANCE FUND/ Insurance Charges 502-000-395-020.00 $365,000 $0 EXPENSES SELF INSURANCE FUND/ Legal Services 502-246-519-033.11 $245,000 $0 SELF INSURANCE FUND/ General Liability 502-246-519-034.53 $25,000 $0 SELF INSURANCE FUND/ Worker's Compensation 502-600-521-012.14 $95,000 $0 JULY 119 2000 -34 6K 114 PG 050 ZL. GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH. 879950HAYENUE. WABASSO - TEMPORARY WATER SER VICE A GREEMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 23, 2000: DATE: MAY 23, 2000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.RY�� DIRECTOR OF UM PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST (� AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS MENT PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT SERVICES SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH WABASSO, FLORIDA BACKGROUND Grace United Methodist Church has requested that a temporary service be installed from the water line at the north end of 501, Avenue, and the west side of U.S. Highway 1, to Service their property at 8799 50" Avenue, Wabasso, Florida ANALYSIS The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall provide temporary water service to Grace United Methodist Church, until such time that a water line may be constructed on 501, Avenue by assessment The Church agrees to pay all fees required to make this cormection. The Church further agrees to participation in the assessment, and to reconnect to this water line as required by the Indian River County Department of Utility Services. RECOMMENDATION The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of Counry Commissioners approve the attached Agreement with Grace United Methodist Church on the Consent Agenda. JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the Agreement with Grace United Methodist Church, as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD -35- noun 114 PG051 r 'I ZM. C. PATRICK FLOOD III AND BROOKE H. FLOOD, 560 DURANT STREET,, SEBASTIAN - TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 1612000: DATE: JUNE 16, 3000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: ' j DONALDIL HUBBS, P n DIRECTOR OF CFS PREPARED JAMES D CH AND STAFFED MANAGER OFPROJECTS Ag BY: DEPARTMENT d&5 ERVICES SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT D IDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND C. PATRICK FLOOD. M AND BROOKE H. FLOOD BACKGROUND C. Patrtck Flood, M and Brooke H. Flood Issue tequead that a tempmwy water sav= be ummiled Gmn d1c Wats line on Dm= Sues., to savm thea home at 360 Du:mt Street., Sebastian, Florida. ANALYSIS The Ageemem states that the Indian River Camty Departmew of Utility Sawn shall provide temporm water sevum to C. Patrick Flood, III and Btoolm H. Flood, omit such time that watt lines may be conxM=d in Roselmd Gard= Subdivizi= by Astaswmt. They Agee to pay all fea required to make this ranoec0- They Aud- sgm to is the assessment and to mcoun t to this wma I= as requind by the IAdian River Cmmty DugtRM= ofth ty Savica. RECOMMENDATION The Deparmau of Utility Services mm ends that the Bowd of Comity Commissiomra approve the Ageanau with C. Patrick Flood, III ad Brooke H. Flood on the Cmsmt AS=& ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the Agreement with C. Patrick Flood, III and Brooke H. Flood, as recommended by staff. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD aur.Y 119 2000 -36- 01% 1 I 4 PG 0 5 2 7.N. RESOLUTION 2000-070 A UTHORIZING COUNTYADMINISTRATOR TO SIGNASSUMPTIONAGREEMENTS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 22,,2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: L- 'ea R. Ke ler, CLA, Legal Assistant County Attorney's Office DATE: June 22, 2000 RE: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN ASSUMPTION AGREEMENTS FOR BOARD Payments owed to the County for special assessments and impact fees may be made over an extended time period. Liens are placed on the properties at the time the project Is authorized by the Board; however, some projects may not be finished for a long while before the final amount due the County is ascertained and the repayment process can begin. As an example of this, assessment liens for utilities and paving and drainage improvements at Vero Tropical Gardens were recorded five years ago, and because of various problems the project has not yet begun. During the interim many properties have changed ownership. Since the benefit from the anticipated improvements will be to the new property owner, at closing the new property owner can sign an Assumption acknowledging responsibility to complete payment of the existing County lien. It is in the County's best interest to be able to track ownership changes and to be certain that any new property owner is aware of and continues to complete payments due to the County. In the past the Board authorized the County Administrator to sign certain assessment and Impact fee documents on its behalf, thereby streamlining the signing process. The attached resolution amends the previous authorizations to include allowing the County Administrator to sign for the Board in the case of Assumptions. JULY 115 2000 -37- J ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-070 amending Resolutions 95-31 and 96-26 which authorized the County Administrator to execute certain assessment and impact fee documents on behalf of the Board (add execution of lien assumptions provided that the forms contain the signatures of the County Attorney and representative of the impacted department). RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 070 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 95-31 AND 96-26, WHICH AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE CERTAIN ASSESS- MENT AND IMPACT FEE DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD. WHEREAS, Indian River County allows payment of special assessments and impact fees over an extended period of time; and WHEREAS, occasionally during this extended time period, the customer sells the property and the new property owner wishes to continue to pay the balance due over time; and WHEREAS, it is in the County's best interest to be able to track these property ownership changes and to have the payments continue to be made by the current owner's executing an Assumption Agreement acknowledging responsibility for the lien; and WHEREAS, it streamlines the process by having the Board authorize the County Administrator, or his designee, to sign the Assumption Agreement on behalf of the Board; JULY 119 2000 -38- BK 114 PG 054 0 . 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS that the Board hereby authorizes the County Administrator, or his designee, to execute lien assumptions on its behalf, provided that the forms contain the signatures of the County Attorney and a representative of the impacted department. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanhri rigP , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 th day of ji�7y , 2000. "l, ^1 M- 6 W(F-am"I'M , W. JULY 119 2000 -39- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By S:2�6 �c�D Fran B. Adams, Chairman ,nmm Rwr Cn I Approved _Daae i i' 1NaW�d 16,71MUME K 14FIG 055 Z O. RESOLUTION 2000-071 AUTHORIZING MASTER STREET LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT (FPL) AND A UTHORIZING COUNTYADMINISTRATOR OR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SIGN The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 26, 2000: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: ul(, William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Master Street Lighting Agreement with FPL Indian River County has a Master Street Lighting Agreement with Florida Power & Light entitled "Conservation Lighting Conversion Agreement" dated November 18, 1981 which incorporates an earlier agreement dated January 6, 1965. Under this agreement, FPL provides service and equipment to the County for street lights on arterial roads as well as within various subdivisions. The County, in tum bills the homeowner associations on an annual basis for FPL's service and equipment. The form that has been used in the past to inform FPL of an addition, modification or deletion to service has changed. The current form filed with the Public Service Commission by FPL is attached for approval. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the current form of Street Lighting Agreement to be used for future additions, modifications or deletions to service with FPL. 2. Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the County Administrator or the Public Works Director as his designee to execute Street Lighting Agreements to add, modify or delete service from the FPL Master Street Lighting Agreement. JULY 11, 2000 -40- BK 114 PG 056 r1 U JULY 11, 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (1) approved the current form of Street Lighting Agreement to be used for future additions, modifications or deletions to service with FPL and (2) adopted Resolution 2000-071 authorizing the substitution of form entitled "Street Lighting Agreement" for adding, modifying or deleting service from the FPL Master Street Lighting Agreement and authorizing the County Administrator or the Public Works Director as his designee to execute such form on behalf of Indian River County. AGREEMENT WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED -41- BK 114 PG 057 • RESOLUTION NO. 2000-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBSTITUTION OF FORM ENTITLED "STREET LIGHTING AGREEMENT" FOR ADDING, MODIFYING OR DELETING SERVICE FROM THE FPL MASTER STREET LIGHTING AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AS HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE SUCH FORM ON BEHALF OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. WHEREAS, Indian River County entered into a Master Street Lighting Agreement with Florida Power & Light Company entitled "Conservation Lighting Conversion Agreement" dated November 18, 1981 which incorporates an earlier agreement dated January 6, 1965; and WHEREAS, the Conservation Lighting Conversion Agreement provides electrical energy necessary for the operation of street lighting systems by FPL within Indian River County, and such other services including installation and removal and maintenance of street lighting systems; and WHEREAS, the agreement provides for a simplified method of addition, modification, deletion and/or replacement of street lighting systems; and WHEREAS, the form for notifying FPL of an addition, modification or deletion to service has been changed by FPL; and WHEREAS, the new form has been filed with the Public Service Commission by FPL; and WHEREAS, the substitution of the form for notifying Florida Power & Light Company of an addition, modification or deletion to service pursuant to the Conservation Lighting Conversion Agreement dated November 18, 1981 and earlier agreement dated January 6, 1965 requires approval by the Board of County Commisioners, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: 1. The form entitled °Street Lighting Agreement" to be used for notifying Florida Power & Light of an addition, modification or deletion to service is JULY 119 2000 -42- BK 114 PG 0 5 8 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 0 7 L hereby approved and substituted in the Conservation Lighting Conversion Agreement dated November 18, 1981 and earlier agreement dated January 6, 1965; 2. The County Administrator or the Public Works Director as his designee may by their signatures execute any Street Lighting Agreement as shown in Exhibit °A° attached. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Stanbridge and seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Fran B. Adams, Chairman ,=— Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman AW— Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman A" Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye— John W. Tippin Ave The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this i I th day of July, 2000. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk � ir, I oll JULY 119 2000 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Fran B. Adams, Chairman -43- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY WILLIAM G. COLLINS It DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY 8K 114 PG it 5 9 7,P. COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS (CONTIyuum OF CARE) - TO BE KNOWNAS "INDIANRIVER HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL. INC -"- FEDERAL EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT APPLICATION The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 30, 2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners June 30, 2000 FROM: William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney RE: Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Application by Coalition For the Homeless of Indian River County, Inc. The Coalition for the Homeless of Indian River County, Inc. is making an application for $250,000 federal emergency shelter grant. (The outline of the proposal is attached.) The grant rules require that the local governing body sign an approval of the project (Appendix 1 attached). As stated in the proposal, there is no County involvement in administrative oversight and no financial obligation other than signing the attached Certification. Recommendation: Authorize the Chairman to sign Appendix 1 "Certification of Local Government Approval for Nonprofit Organization" on behalf of the County. Commissioner Ginn was happy to recommend that the Board approve the application. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to sign Appendix 1 "Certification of Local Government Approval for Nonprofit Organization" on behalf of the County, as recommended by staff. COPY OF CERTIFICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD JULY 119 2000 � 6K 114 PG 060 0 8. SHERIFF GARY C. WHEELER - AMEND 1999-00 BUDGET TO REFLECT OUT -OF -COUNTY INMATE REVENUE The Board reviewed a letter of June 19, 2000: ��jeriff GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION 4055 41 st AVENUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700 June 19, 2000 The Honorable Fran B. Adams, Chairman Indian River Board of County Commissioners 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394 Re: Budget Adjustment, Out -Of -County Inmate Revenue Dear Chairman Adams: This letter is a request to amend our fiscal year 1999-2000 Operating Budget. In the month of March, 2000, we generated prisoner revenue totaling $106,815, detailed below: U.S. Marshal - 983 innate days at $60.00 per day $ 58,980 Charlotte County - 331 inmate days at $45.00 per day 14.895 Polk County - 36 inmate days at $35.00 per day 1.260 I.N.S.- 528 inmates at $60.00 per day 31.680 Total Revenue $ 106,815 The $58,980, when received from the U.S. Marshal's office, will be forwarded to you for deposit into the County's General Fund. We are asking to amend our budget by $47,835 received from, Charlotte County, Polk County and the Immigration and Naturalization Service, less $3.000. The last Budget Adjustment, copy attached, dated May 15, 2000, contained an incorrect figure. The amount to be allocated should have been $25.870, not $28,870. The fast $15.00 of each innate day will be used to offset the expense of housing the prisoners. This represents $ 13.425 for the month of March. These monies will be distributed as follows: Corrections Overtime $ 3.687 Corrections Food For Jail 4,869 Corrections Operating Supplies 4.869 Total Corrections $ 13,425 JULY 119 2000 The balance of the revenue, or $34,410, will be used to fund the Aviation Component as agreed during the Budget Hearings in September of last year. These monies will be distributed as follows: Aviation Salaries Aviation Operating Expense Total Aviation Component $ 17590 13.820 $ 31,410 I am requesting this item be placed on the Agenda at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or any further information is required, please let me know. Sincerely, Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated • ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously amended the Sheriff's 1999-2000 Operating Budget to show prisoner revenue totaling $106,815 to be distributed as follows: $58,980 from U.S. Marshal's Office for deposit into the County's General Fund; $14,895 from Charlotte County, $1,260 from Polk County, and $31,680 from I.N.S. to be distributed as follows: $3,687 to Corrections Overtime, $4,869 to Corrections Food for Jail, $4,869 for Corrections Operating Supplies, and $34,410 to fund the Aviation Component, as requested by the Sheriff. aur.Y 119 2000 @� 1 1 4 PG 062 • -46 0 0 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-019 ADOPTING SECTION 210.04, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR LOCAL COLLECTION, ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT OF THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX: PROVIDING FOR REMITTANCE OF THE TAX TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT: PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT: PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT POWERS: PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES: PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 1, 2000 PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 23, 2000: JULY 119 2000 -47- BK 114 PG 063 • TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: EC& William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 23, 2000 SUBJECT: Public Hearing on an Ordinance Providing for Local Collection, Administration, Audit and Enforcement of the Tourist Development Tax by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County For a number of years members of the Tourist Development Council have suspected that collections could be enhanced through enforcement by a local entity with more familiarity with the short-term rental industry in the community than has the Department of Revenue. Since the Board's inquiry of Clerk as to his interest in administering the local collection of the tourist tax, Mr. Barton has been in contact with other clerks who undertake similar programs. Mr. Barton has tentatively suggested commencement date of October 1, 2000 for collection of the tax locally. This would allow some time for the printing of forms, training of personnel, testing of software, etc. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, obtain input from Mr. Barton and interested members of the public, and take appropriate action on the attached ordinance. Deputy County Attorney Will Collins noted that both the Tourist Development Council and the Board had agreed that this tax could be enhanced by local collection and Clerk Jeffrey Barton had agreed to handle that collection. The proposed ordinance has been modeled after the Seminole County ordinance and provides for the Clerk of Court to begin collection procedures on October 1, 2000, to give the Clerk time for preparation of forms and training of staff. The Board or the Clerk can return responsibility for collection of this tax to the Department of Revenue upon giving 6 months' notice. JULY 119 2000 -48- 1K 1 14 PG 0 6 4 • Clerk Jeffrey Barton stated that he would be happy to answer any questions and that he will set up a program of education for the public and the condominium market to bring them up to date on their responsibilities. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 2000-019 adopting Section 210.04, Indian River County Code, to provide for local collection, administration, and audit of the Tourist Development Tax; providing for remittance of the tax to the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court; providing for collection and enforcement by the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court; providing for auditing by the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court; providing enforcement powers; providing for penalties; providing for codification; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date. JULY 119 2000 -49- BN 114 PG 065 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 019 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING SECTION 210.04, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR LOCAL COLLECTION, ADMINISTRATION, AND AUDIT OF THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX; PROVIDING FOR REMITTANCE OF THE TAX TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING FOR AUDITING BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT; PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT POWERS; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, has levied and imposed a Tourist Development Tax at the rate of three percent (3%) of each dollar and major fraction of each dollar of the total consideration charged for lease or rental of living accommodations for a term of six (6) months or less pursuant to Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Tourist Development Tax levied in Indian River County is currently being collected and administered by the State of Florida Department of Revenue pursuant to Section 125.0104(3), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Section 125.0104(10), Florida Statutes allows for the collection and administration of the tourist development tax on a local basis; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that it is In Its best Interest to locally collect and administer the tourist development tax as well as assume the responsibility for auditing the records and accounts of dealers, and collecting and enforcing payments of current and delinquent taxes with functions being accomplished through the Office of the Indian Rver County Clerk of the Circuit Court; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County now desires to amend its Tourist Development Tax ordinance, as codified in Chapter 210, Indian River County Code, to provide for the local collection and administration of the tourist development tax as well as the assumption of all responsibility for auditing the records and accounts of dealers and assessing, JULY 119 2000 -sa BK 1 14 PG 066 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 019 collecting, and enforcing payments of current and delinquent taxes pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. Chapter 210, Indian River County Code is hereby amended to add Section 210.04 as follows: Section 210.04. Local administration of tourist development tax. (a) Any person, firm or corporation receiving consideration for rental or lease (herein referred to as the °dealer°) for any period subsequent to October 1, 2000, shall receive, account for, and remit the tax to the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court. (b) initial collection of the Tax shall be made In the same manner as the Tax imposed under chapter 212, Florida Statutes. (c) The Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court shall be responsible for the collection of the Tax from the dealer and administration of the Tax. (d) The same duties and privileges imposed by Chapter 212, Florida Statutes, upon dealers in tangible property, respecting the collection and remission of Tax, the making of returns, the keeping of books, records and accounts, shall apply to and be binding upon all persons who are subject to the provisions of this chapter, provided, however, that the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court may authorize a quarterly return and payment when the Tax remitted by the person receiving the consideration for such rental or lease for the preceding quarter did not exceed ONE HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($100.00). (e) The Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court shall promulgate such rules, and prescribe and publish such forms as may be necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Section. (f) The Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court shall perform the enforcement functions associated with the collection and remission of this Tax. (g) A total of three percent (3%) of the total Tourist Development Tax collected shall be retained by the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court for costs of administration. (h) The Taxes imposed by this Section shall become County funds at the moment of collection and shall for each month be due to the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court on the first (1st) day and is delinquent on the twenty-first (21st) day of the month following, unless otherwise provided for by subsection (d). Collections received by the Indian River County Cleric of the Circuit Court from the JULY 119 2000 -s i- BK 114 PG 067 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 019 tax, less costs of administration of the local collection, shall be paid and returned, on a monthly basis, to Indian River County, Florida, for use by the County In accordance with the provisions of this chapter and shall be placed in the "Indian River County Tourist Development Trust Fund" (i) The Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court assumes all responsibility for collecting and enforcing payment of current and delinquent Tourist Development Taxes. The Clerk of the Circuit Court adopts any and all powers and authority granted to the State of Florida in Section 125.0104 and Chapter 212, Florida Statutes, and as further incorporated therein to determine the amount of the Tax, penalties and interest to be paid by each dealer and to enforce payment of such Tax, penalties, and Interest by, but not limited to, distress warrants, writ of gamishments and criminal penalties as provided in Chapter 212, Florida Statutes. In addition to criminal sanctions, the clerk is empowered, and It shall be its duty, when any tax becomes delinquent or Is otherwise in jeopardy under this section, to issue a warrant for the full amount of the tax due or estimated to be due, with the interest, penalties and cost of collection, directed to all and singular the sheriffs of the state, and shall record the warrant in the public records of the county; and thereupon the amount of the warrant shall become a lien on any real or personal property of the taxpayer in the same manner as a recorded judgment. The clerk may issue a tax execution to enforce the collection of taxes imposed by this section and deliver it to the sheriff. The sheriff shall thereupon proceed in the same manner as prescribed by law for executions and shall be entitled to the same fees for his services in executing the warrant to be collected. The clerk may also have a writ of garnishment to subject any indebtedness due to the delinquent dealer by a third person in any goods, money, chattels or effects of the delinquent dealer in the hands, possession or control of the third person In the manner provided by law for the payment of the tax due. Upon payment of the execution, warrant, judgment or garnishment, the clerk shall satisfy the lien of record within thirty (3) days. 0) As specifically provided by Section 212.12, Florida Statutes, Penalties for Non-Compliancewhen any person, firm, or corporation required hereunder to make any return or to pay the tax imposed, fails to timely file such return or fails to pay the tax due with in the time required hereunder, in addition to all other penalties provided herein and by the laws of this state in respect to such taxes, a specific penalty shall be added to the tax in the amount of ten percent (10%) of any unpaid tax, if the failure is for not more than thirty (30) days, or fraction thereof, during the time which the failure continues, not to exceed a total penalty of fifty percent (50%), In the aggregate, of any unpaid tax. In no event may the penalty be less than TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) for failure to timely file a tax return required. (k) Interest earned on the tax collections received by the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court shall be remitted by the Clerk of the Circuit Court on a quarterly basis to be placed in the Indian River County Tourist Development Tax Fund. (1) The Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County or his/her designated agent shall perform the audit functions associated with this tax, including, without limitation, the following: JULY 119 2000 -52- K 114 PG tl b 0 • • ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 019 (1) For the purpose of enforcing this Part, the Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby specifically authorized and empowered to examine at all reasonable hours the books, records, and other documents of all persons taxable hereunder, or other persons charged with the duty to report or pay a tax under this chapter, in order to determine whether they are collecting the tax or otherwise complying with this chapter. In the event said person refuses to permit such examination of Its books records, or other documents by the Clerk of the Circuit Court as aforesaid, such person is guilty of violating the provisions of this chapter and shall be subject to the penalties provided for In Section 125.69, Florida Statutes. The Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court shall have the right to proceed in Circuit Court to seek a mandatory injunction or other appropriate remedy to enforce its rights against the offender, as granted by this Section, to require an examination of the books and records of such dealer. (2) Each person taxable hereunder, shall secure, maintain, and keep for a period of three (3) years a complete record of rooms or other lodging, leased or rented by said persons, together with gross receipts from such sales, and other pertinent records and papers as may be required by the Cleric of the Circuit Court for the reasonable administration of this section; and all such records which are located or maintained in this State shall be open for inspection by the Clerk of the Circuit Court at all reasonable hours at such person's place of business located in Indian River County. Any person who maintains such books and records at a point outside this county must make such books and records available for inspection by the Clerk of the Circuit Court in Indian River County. Any person subject to the provisions of this chapter who violates these provisions shall be subject to the penalties provided for in Section 125.69, Florida Statutes. (3) The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall send written notification, at least thirty (30) days prior to the date an auditor is scheduled to begin an audit, informing the taxpayer of the audit. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is not required to give thirty (30) days prior notification of a forthcoming audit in any instance in which the taxpayer requests an emergency audit. (A) Such written notification shall contain: (i) The appropriate date of which the auditor is scheduled to begin the audit. (ii) A reminder that all of the records, receipts, Invoices, and related documentation of the taxpayer must be made available to the auditor. (iii) Any other request or suggestions the Clerk of the Circuit Court may deem necessary. (B) Only records, receipts, invoices, and related documentation which are available to the auditor when such audit begins shall be deemed acceptable for the purposes of conducting such audit. JULY 119 2000 -53- BK 1 14 PG 069 • ORDINANCE NO. 2000-019_ (m) Any dealer who fails or refuses to charge and collect the Tax from the person paying any rental or lease, either by himself or through his agents or employees, is (pursuant to Section 125.0104(8)(a), Florida Statutes), in addition to being personally liable for the payment of the Tax, guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in Section 775.082 and 775.083, Florida Statutes. (n) No person shall advertise or hold out to the public in any manner, directly or indirectly, that he will absorb all or any part of the Tax, that he will relieve the person paying the rental of the payment of all or any part of the Tax, or that the Tax will not be added to the rental or lease consideration or, when added, that it or any part thereof will be refunded or refused, either directly or indirectly, by any method whatsoever. Any person who willfully violates any provision of this subsection is (pursuant to Section 125.0104(8)(b), Florida Statutes), guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in Section 775.082 or 775.083, Florida Statutes. (o) As compensation for the keeping of prescribed records and the proper accounting and remitting of Taxes, a dealer shall be allowed a dealer's credit in accordance with the provision of Section 212.12(1), Florida Statutes. (p) Tax revenues collected hereunder may be used only in accordance with the provision of Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes. Taxes collected by the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court, less costs of administration identified In subsection (g) of this section shall be remitted on a monthly basis for deposit Into the Indian River County Tourist Development Trust Fund. (q) The Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court shall keep appropriate books, records and accounts of the Tourist Development Tax collections and make quarterly written reports of collections to the Indian River County Tourist Development Council, through the Office of Management and Budget of Indian River County. SECTION 2. It Is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Indian River County Code and the word °ordinance° may be changed to °section; "article," or other appropriate word or phrase and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; providing, however, that Sections 2, 3, and 4 shall not be codified. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, or any sentence, paragraph, phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, and It shall be JULY 11, 2000 -54- BK 114 PG 070 ORDINANCE NO. 2000-019 construed to have been the legislative Intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. Certified copies of this ordinance, as enacted, shall be filed by the Clerk with the Office of the Secretary of State and the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida within ten days after enactment, and this ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Secretary of State, or on October 1, 2000, whichever is later. SECTION 5. CONTINGENT SUNSET PROVISION. (a) The agreement of the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court and the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, necessary for the implementation of this Ordinance, shall commence on October 1, 2000, and end on September 30, 2001, the date of the signature of the parties notwithstanding. This agreement shall automatically be renewed for subsequent periods, not to exceed one (1) year in length of time, unless notice of intent to cancel is timely given. Notice of intent to cancel the agreement by either party shall be given at least six (6) months prior to the date of automatic renewal. The date of automatic renewal shall be the first day following the end of the last period of time for which the agreement had been renewed. (b) If notice to cancel the aforementioned agreement is properly given by either of the parties, the provisions of Section 210.04, Indian River County Code, governing the local collection of the Tourist Development Tax, contained In this Ordinance, shall lapse on the date the aforementioned agreement lapses, unless an alternative means for the local collection of the Tourist Development Tax is previously adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 11th day of 3 u 1 y , 2000. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press-Joumal on the 28th day of June, 2000, for a public hearing to be held on the 11th day of July, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner M A r h + , seconded by Commissioner T i o o i n , and adopted by the following vote: JULY 119 2000 Chairman Fran B. Adams A y a Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Y e Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge _Ky--e— Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye -55- BK 114 PG 07 1 • ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 019 The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 11th day of ju1 y 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By. se Fran B. Adams, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Deputy Cie c Effve D te: This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on 3� day of , 2000, and becomes effective October 1, 2000. Accepted and Approved: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFI IENCY Je .Barton r Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court BY -7-/j 2000 WILLIAM G. COLLINS II DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Ji1LY 119 2000 -56- 114 4 PG fl 7 2 • 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-020 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 21, 2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: VlfWilliam G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 21, 2000 RE: Ordinance Prohibiting Discharge of Firearms across Unpaved Roads At the request of the Board at an earlier meeting, Acting County Attorney O'Brien prepared and published a Notice of Public Hearing to consider adoption of an ordinance on the above topic. The proposed ordinance extends the state law prohibition against shooting across paved roads to unpaved roads in the county. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 2000-020 establishing regulations concerning the discharge of firearms. JULY 119 2000 -s7- 11 BK 1 14 PG 07 3 r ORDINANCE 2000-M AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS. WHEREAS, the State has regulated the discharge of firearms in public (Section 790.15, F.S.); and WHEREAS, said regulations, among other things, prohibit the discharge of firearms over or on the right-of-way of any paved public roads; and WHEREAS, Indian River County has a number of unpaved roads in developed areas; and WHEREAS, it is in the public health, safety and welfare to afford this protection to persons in the vicinity of unpaved roads, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT, The Indian River County Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section 306.13 to Chapter 306 of the Indian River County Code to read as follows: Section 306.13. Prohibition against discharge of Firearms It is unlawful for any person to discharge a firearm on or over the right-of-way of any public road, highway or street in Indian River County whether paved or unpaved. This section does not apply to a person lawfully defending life or property or performing official duties requiring the discharge of a firearm or to a person discharging a firearm on public roads or properties expressly approved for hunting by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission or Division of Forestry. SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, or any sentence, paragraph, phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, and it shall be JULY 119 2000 -58- 8K 1 14 PG 074 • ORDINANCE 2000 -gyp construed to have been the legislative intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. A certified copy of this ordinance, as enacted, shall be filed by the Clerk with the Office of the Secretary of State of the state of Florida within ten days after enactment, and this ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Secretary of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 11th day of .111y , 2000. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal on the 9th day of June for a public hearing on the 11`" of July, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbridge , and seconded by Commissioner Ginn , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn AyP Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye CommissionerRuth M. Stanbridge Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin AyP The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 11th day of July , 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION Attest: J.K. BARTON INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By�C'2 116 Deputy Clerk Fran B. Adams, Chairman Effective ate: This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on day of , 2000 and became effective that date. 1intno pint Co Approved Date JULY 119 2000 -59- MuEnaCm- 8Kii4PG075 • 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - WE CARE OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC. - APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO PROVIDE NON -EMERGENCY BAKER ACT INTERFACILITY TRANSPORT SERVICES PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 28, 2000: TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Douglas M. Wright, D' ctor Emergency Services 1 DATE: June 28, 2000 SUBJECT: Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from We Care of the Treasure Coast, Inc., to Provide Non -Emergency Baker Act Interfacility Transport Services On May 8, 2000, an application was received from We Care of the Treasure Coast, Inc., for a Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide non -emergency interfacility Baker Act transportation services in Indian River County. Pursuant to Chapter 304 of the Indian River County Code titled Life Support and Wheelchair Services, an investigation was initiated routinely regarding the application. Public notice has been given pursuant to Chapter 304 and the issue now before the Board is for the consideration of the We Care of the Treasure Coast, Inc. application for a Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. A Class E Certificate is defined in Chapter 304.14 (2) as follows: Any person who provides wheelchair vehicle services where said services are paid for in part or in whole either directly or indirectly with government funds shall be required to have a Class E certificate. As part of the routine application investigation, letters were sent to each municipality, hospital, and nursing home/facility in the county seeking input regarding the application. Also on June 1, 2000, an informational meeting was held for any individual, provider, organization. hospital, or municipality to make inquiries or discuss any concerns with the applicant regarding the proposed service. During the course of the informational meeting, the other providers who hold a certificate of public convenience JULY 11, 2000 Bu 114PG076 r� u C] and necessity voted to recommend to EMS Director Doug Wright that the certificate, limited to Baker Act transports, private pay only, be favorably considered and recommended for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Staff asserts that a sufficient need has been demonstrated for this additional service based on the investigation and input from the other providers as noted in their recommendation to the EMS Director. Staff has inspected the two Baker Act transport units owned by We Care and found no deficiencies. Both units are recent models and creditable transportation units. The fee schedule is reasonable and the required insurance has been verified and found to be in compliance with Chapter 304. Several letters of recommendation were reviewed and found to be commendable of the We Care service provider. Contact was also made with the office of the Florida Secretary of State which revealed an active corporation with no adverse history. Since We Care of the Treasure Coast is not under contract with the Indian River County Community Transportation Coordinator, the transport service will be limited to private pay transports as prior granted to another existing transport service. RECOMMENDATION: Based on current available information, staff recommends that subsequent to the public hearing, the Board approve the request by We Care of the Treasure Coast. Inc., for a Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide non -emergency interfacility Baker Act private pay transports in Indian River County for a period of two years. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the request by We Care of the Treasure Coast, Inc. for a Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide non- emergency interfacility Baker Act private pay transports in Indian River County for a period of two years, as recommended by staff. COPY OF CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD -61- 8K 114 PG 077 9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - PARADISE PARTNERS. INC. - ORDINANCE 2000-021 AND ORDINANCE 2000-022 AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ±249 FEET SOUTH OF CR -512 AND ±235 FEET EAST OF CR -510 FROM C/I TO L-1 AND REZONING THOSE ±0.63 ACRES FROM CG TO A-1 AND BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CR -512 ±300 FEET EAST OF CR -510 FROM L-1 TO C/I AND REZONING THOSE ±0.63 ACRES FROM A-1 TO CG (Legislative PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD CLERK'S NOTE: DEFERRED FROM MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2000 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 26, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator DE TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE Obert M. Keating, MCI; Co nity Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning 5-A A FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning{��i(/ DATE: June 26, 2000 RE: Paradise Partners, Inc., Request to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate +0.63 Acres From C/I to L-1, and to Rezone Those :0.63 Acres From CG to A-1; and to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate +.0-63 Acres From L-1 to CA, and to Rezone Those +0.63 Acres from A-1 to CG JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG 0 7 8 -62- 0 0 PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 2000-040107 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 11, 2000. DESCRiPT10N AND CONDffTONC This is a request to redesignate *0.63 acres from C/I, Commercial/Industrial, to L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre), while simultaneously redesignating a nearby *0.63 acre tract from L-1 to C/I. Unlike node expansion requests, the proposed amendment will not increase the amount of C/I designated land in the county. Rather, this amendment will reconfigure the CR 510/CR 512 C/I node. The property to be redesignated from C/I to L-1 is the westernmost subject property depicted on Figures 1 and 2. That property will be referred to as Subject Property 1. In addition to changing the land use designation of Subject Property 1, the request also involves rezoning Subject Property I from CG, General Commercial District, to A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres). Figure 2: Location and Land Use Designation of the Subject Properties MB K L-1 %R,A�Nv� sono FMkM s� JOIN C.R. 512 Subject ,.. Property 2 . O C.1 Subject Property 1 ■ /sem Iwo C • /1 i P L-1 67! AC oaoota enX= At 9g s dam AC ��®��/��■ � Bey S� $ va • .av' L-1 JULY 119 2000 —63— Tiinnra l* 7nninv and Location of the Subject Properties The property to be redesignated from L-1 to C/I is luted just north and east of Subject Property L That property will be referred to as Subject Property 2. In addition to changing the land use designation of Subject Property 2, the request involves rezoning Subject Property 2 from A-1 to CG. Both subject properties are owned by Paradise Partners, Inc., and located near the southeast corner of CR 510 and CR 512. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning and land use designation necessary to develop Subject Property 2 with commercial uses. On May 25, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4 to 2 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request. On June 20, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners took two votes regarding this request. The first vote was 2 to 2 on a motion to deny the request. The second vote, to table the matter until the July 11, 2000, meetingjpassed 4 to 0. JULY 119 2000 I %4 AC .t R�A6A4D� A-1 sow - " ■ 2.1 IM6M S1B o-o� • • o C.R. 512 060 .� subject Property 2 ■ ■ r Subject ■ Property 1 ■ ON ■ A-1 ' •M ■ ■ CL Y< / � ♦ OQO00 CL aye AC mama * •� uae RS -3 The property to be redesignated from L-1 to C/I is luted just north and east of Subject Property L That property will be referred to as Subject Property 2. In addition to changing the land use designation of Subject Property 2, the request involves rezoning Subject Property 2 from A-1 to CG. Both subject properties are owned by Paradise Partners, Inc., and located near the southeast corner of CR 510 and CR 512. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning and land use designation necessary to develop Subject Property 2 with commercial uses. On May 25, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4 to 2 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request. On June 20, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners took two votes regarding this request. The first vote was 2 to 2 on a motion to deny the request. The second vote, to table the matter until the July 11, 2000, meetingjpassed 4 to 0. JULY 119 2000 I Comnrehem.dve Plan Am ndm nt Review Prorpdures The state allows local governments to use alternative adoption procedures for "small scale" plan amendments that meet certain criteria. Section 163.3187(1)(c) of the Florida Statutes sets the following criteria for small scale amendments; 1. The proposed amendment involves 10 or fewer acres; 2. The cumulative effect of the acreage for all small scale amendments in the jurisdiction does not exceed 80 acres in a calendar year, 3. The proposed amendment does not involve the same property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months; 4. The proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months; 5. The proposed amendment does not involve a change to the comprehensive plan's text; 6. The subject property is not within an area of critical state concern; and 7. The proposed amendment does not involve increasing residential density above 10 unitsiacre Small scale plan amendments are deemed to have fewer impacts than typical plan amendments and are eligible for a streamlined adoption process. In contrast to typical plan amendments which require review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), local governments may adopt small scale plan amendments without review or approval by DCA. In this case, the procedures for reviewing the subject comprehensive plan amendment will be as follows. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducts a public hearing to review the request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the comprehensive plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of or deny the rezoning portion of the request. If the rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, unless the denial to rezone is appealed. Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, the Board takes final action to approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests. Besides being exempt from DCA review, small scale amendments are also exempt from the state's statutory limitations on the frequency of adopting comprehensive plan amendments. For example, although the number of standard plan amendments that a local government may consider is not limited, the frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is regulated by state law. According to Florida Statutes, standard plan amendments are limited to twice per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts standard plan amendment applications only during the two `window" months of January and July. All requests submitted during each window month are processed simultaneously. That method ensures that standard plan amendments will be adopted no more than twice per calendar year. State law, however, provides several exceptions to the twice per calendar year limitation. One of those exceptions is for small scale plan amendments. Consequently, a local government may adopt small scale amendments, such as the subject plan amendment, without regard for the twice per calendar year limitation. For that reason, the proposed amendment is exempt from the twice per calendar year adoption limit. JULY 119 2000 -65- RK 114 PG 08 1 Land in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of CR 512 and CR 510 contains the subject properties. Except for a convenience store with a gas station on the comer, and a fruit stand along CR 510, that area consists of a vacant abandoned citrus grove. In that quadrant, land within 300 feet of CR 510 and 670 feet of CR 512 is zoned CG. Beyond those limits, land is zoned A-1. Property at the southwest comer of CR 512 and CR 510 is zoned CL, Limited Commercial District, and consists of vacant rangeland. Another convenience store with a gas station is at the northwest comer. Land in that corner is zoned CL. The northeast quadrant consists of undeveloped land containing a hardwood hammock. In that quadrant, land within approximately 290 feet of CR 512 and 300 feet of CR 510 is zoned CL. North and east of those limits, land is zoned A-1. Subject Property 1 Subject Property 1 and properties to the north and west are designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on the county's future land use map. That designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts. Land to the south and east of Subject Property 1 is designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on the county's future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. Subject Property 2 Subject Property 2 and properties to the north, south, and east are designated L-1. Land west of Subject Property 2 is designated C/I. Consisting of cleared sites, neither subject property contains environmentally significant habitat such as uplands or wetlands. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject properties are not within a flood hazard area. Water lines extend to the subject sites from the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant, while wastewater lines extend to the sites from the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Both CR 510 and CR 512 can provide access to the subject properties. CR 510 is classified as a rural minor arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of CR 510 is a two lane paved road with approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This segment of CR 510 is programmed for expansion to four lanes by 2020. JULY 119 2000 8K 114 PG 082 • West of CR 510, CR 512 is classified as a rural principal arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. East of CR 510, CR 512 is classified as a rural minor arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. Near CR 510, CR 512 is a two lane paved road with approximately 100 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This segment of CR 512 is programmed for expansion to four lanes by 2005. In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. Following a discussion of plan amendment review standards, this section will include the following: • an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the proposed amendment's compatibility with surrounding areas; • an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and • an analysis of the proposed amendment's potential impact on environmental quality. Unlike most land use designation amendment requests, this request does not involve an increase in land use intensity. As proposed, the request involves a minor reconfiguration, rather than an expansion, of the commercial/industrial node. For this reason, the subject request can be characterized differently from most plan amendments. Typically, plan amendments involve increases in allowable density or intensity of development. As such, the typical amendment would result in impacts to public facilities and changes to land use patterns. Consequently, both the county comprehensive plan and state policy dictate that a high standard of review is required for typical plan amendments. This standard of review requires justification for the proposed change based upon adequate data and analysis. The subject amendment, however, differs significantly from a typical plan amendment request. Instead of proposing density or intensity increases, the subject amendment involves only a locational shift in future land uses with no overall increase in land use intensity. Staffs position is that these different types of plan amendments warrant different standards of review. Since the typical type of amendment can be justified only by challenging the projections, need assessments, and standards used to prepare the original plan, a high standard of review is justified For amendments involving just shifts in land uses and no intensity/density increase, less justification is necessary. This recognizes that no single land use plan map is correct and that many variations may conform to accepted land use principles and meet established plan policies. Both sites comprising this request are located within the County Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed. For land use designation amendment and rezoning requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency determination application process. JULY 119 2000 -67- 1 g , • _I As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt from concurrency requirements. For the subject request, the size of the C/I node will not change, although the node's shape will be reconfigured Therefore, this land use amendment and rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested land use designation and zoning changes would not increase the potential land use intensity that the sites could accommodate. It is important to note that approval of this request will not affect service levels for any public facility. In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site development. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand. Compatibility with the surrounding area is not a major concern for this request. With or without the proposed amendment's minor reconfiguration, the node's basic circumstances do not change. Those circumstances are that it contains approximately 50 acres and is located at the intersection of two major roads. Most incompatibilities occur where commercial/indusuial land abuts residential land. In this case, all of the land abutting the subject properties is owned by the applicant; therefore, the proposed amendment would not result in any C/I designated land abutting any residentially designated land not owned by the applicant. For those reasons, development of the subject properties under the proposed land use designations and zoning districts will be compatible with surrounding areas. Land use amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the county code, the "comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), FS." Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. The goals, obiectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statement, in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions—including plan amendment and rezoning decisions. While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following policies. Future Land Use Element Policy 143 In evaluating a landuse amendment request, the most important consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria are: • The proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; JULY 119 2000 0V 114 ?G 084 UA -68- The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment is wan -anted based on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property; or • The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at separate sites and, that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed land use amendment meets the policy's fourth criterion. As specifically cited in the policy, the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at separate sites, and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. For those reasons, the proposed amendment meets the fourth criterion of Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 and is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 Future Land Use EIement Policy 1.11 states that the Low -Density Residential land use designations are intended for land that is located within the urban service area and near existing urban centers. Located within the urban service area and near the City of Sebastian, Subject Property 1 meets those criteria Under the proposed amendment, Subject Property 1 would have a Low -Density Residential land use designation For that reason, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the CommerciaVIndustrial land use designation shall be limited to lands that are located within the urban service area and near existing urban centers. Located within the urban service area and near the City of Sebastian, Subject Property 2 meets those criteria. Under the proposed amendment, Subject Property 2 would have a Commercial/Industrial land use designation. For that reason, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20 states that nodes shall have a designated size based on the intended use and service area population, existing land use pattern and other demand characteristics. The amount of CJI designated land is based on service area population, the existing land use pattern, and other demand characteristics. The proposed amendment will not alter the amount of C/I designated land. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 states that 70% of the land area of a node should be developed with non-residential and non-agricultural uses before that node is considered for expansion. The JULY 119 2000 0 intent of this policy is to regulate increases in the amount of C/I designated land. Since the proposed amendment does not increase in the amount of C/I designated land in the subject node, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22's 70% developed standard does not apply to this amendment. Economic Development Element Policy 1.8 Economic Development Element Policy 1.8 states that the county shall evaluate the size and location of nodes to ensure they can properly provide for growth. Since the proposed amendment reconfigures the subject node to better provide for growth, the proposed amendment implements Economic Development Element Policy 1.8. Consistency Summary As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based upon this analysis, staff determined that the proposed land use designation amendment and rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The subject properties are disturbed sites. As such, they contain no wetlands, or environmentally important or environmentally sensitive habitat. Therefore, development of the subject properties under the proposed land use designations and zoning districts would not be anticipated to adversely impact any significant environmental resources. The proposed amendment reconfigures a commercial/industrial node to increase land use efficiency and facilitate economic development. No increase in the amount of C/I designated land or land use density/intensity is proposed. The subject request is consistent with the comprehensive plan, compatible with all surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts on the environment or the provision of public services. For these reasons, staff supports the request. Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment and rezoning by adopting the attached ordinances. JULY 119 2000 -70- Ilk i E i:* GENERAL Applicant: Paradise Partners, Inc. T ocation: ±249 feet south of CR 512 and 1235 feet east of CR 510 Acreage: ±0.63 Existing Land I Ne Desi ationc: C/I, Commercial/Industrial Requested Land I Jse Desig an tion: L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre) Existing Zoning: CG, General Commercial District Requested .ening: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) Exi�cting Land Use: Abandoned citrus grove ADJACENT LAND North and West: Abandoned citrus grove, convenience store on corner, fruit stand along CR 510; zoned CG, General Commercial District Routh nd . ct: Abandoned citrus grove; zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) INFRASTRUCTURE Water and sewer lines extend to the site; access is from CR 510 and CR 512 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Staff Can= John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 7, 2000 # of SLnrounding R=c= Owners Notified: 8 Date Notification Mailed: June 6, 2000 Date Rio Posted: June 5, 2000 STAFF RECOMNIENDATION Staff supports the request PZC RECONEVIEENDATION Approval (4-2) ATIALHAM 1 JULY 119 2000 gn ►l4 PG 087 GENERAL Applicant: Paradise Partners, Inc. i .oration: South side of CR 512,±300 feet east of CR 510 Acreage: ±0.63 Existing Land I Tae Designations: tions: L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre) Requested Land i Tse Desig an tion: CA, Commercial/Industrial Fxisting .onin : A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) Requested Zoning: CG, General Commercial District Existing Land I Ise: Abandoned citrus grove ADJACENT LAND North: CR 512 South and Fast: Abandoned citrus grove; zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) West: Abandoned citrus grove, convenience store on comer, zoned CG, General Commercial District INFRASTRUCTURE Water and sewer lines extend to the site; access is from CR 510 and CR 512 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION aff Conti : John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 7, 2000 # of S nro ndingR=cM Owners Notified: 8 Date Notification Mailed: June 6, 2000 Date Sign Posted: June 5, 2000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the request PZC RECOMMENDATION Approval (42) JULY 119 2000 BULB, 1 1 4 PG 0 8 8 Community Development Director Bob Keating presented the proposal utilizing a PowerPoint presentation and noted that the Planning & Zoning Commission had voted 4-2 in favor of the proposal and staff also recommends approval. There will be no increase in density of land use. (CLERK'S NOTE: COPY OF POWERPOINT PRESENTATION IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY'S MEETING.) Commissioner Stanbridge expressed her concern about adding to the road frontage and stated that the node concept was initiated to avoid strip malls along our roadways. Director Keating stated that the land swap complies with the regulations and he did not believe approval of this swap would set a policy. This swap changes the boundaries but does not increase the size of the node. Commissioner Ginn was concerned that there will be no buffer or transitional zones. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding this matter. Bruce Barkett, attorney for applicant, 756 Beachland Boulevard, stated that this is a small scale change and does not change the size of the node or the density of use. This swap will improve the compatibility with the surrounding uses and there will be no adverse environmental impact. Bob Denton, 11245 Roseland Road, a concerned citizen, expressed his concerns about the traffic situation and about a remark made by one of the Planning & Zoning Commission members that he "did not understand anything that was said" while he still voted for approval. He believed there will be a large negative impact on the community. JULY 119 2000 -73- BK 1 14 PG 089 Mr. Denton then read from a newspaper article and stated his concern that this change may set a precedent. He emphasized that Indian River County has a quality lifestyle and felt there should be more restrictive criteria for granting such a swap. Frank Zorc, 2044 DeLeon Avenue, supported the approval of the project and was not too sure it matters what a private property owner does with his property once he receives support from an advisory board. The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Macht stated that this is a legislative process only and the Board is not sitting in a judicial capacity. The consideration in this instance does not extend to any other applicant. He wanted a disclaimer on the record that he would support the application but this decision is legislative and applies only to this particular application on its merits and circumstances. Commissioner Stanbridge stated she could support the small scale plan for this specific property but felt the rules should be amended to add more restrictions, with some particular language regarding small scale stripping. Commissioner Ginn felt the project was outside the Comprehensive Plan regulations and did enlarge the commercial node on CR -512. She supports private enterprise but could not support this application. JULY 119 2000 74 BK 114 PG 090 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board, by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Grin opposed) adopted Ordinance 2000-021 amending the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan by changing the Land Use Designation for ±0.63 acres located ±249 feet south of CR -5 12 and ±235 feet east of CR -510 from C/I to L-1; and by changing the Land Use Designation for ±0. 63 acres located on the south side of CR -512,±300 feet east of CR -510 from L-1 to C/I (Paradise Partners, Inc.). ORDINANCE NO. 2000-021 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR 10.63 ACRES LOCATED ±249 FEET SOUTH OF CR 512 AND 1235 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM C/I TO L-1; AND BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR 10.63 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CR 512,±300 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM L-1 TO C/I; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners substantially revised and updated the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan, based on the recommendations of the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Report, on March 17, 1998, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan amendment request on May 25, 2000, after due public notice, and JULY 119 2000 FIJI BK 1 1 4 PG 09 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 021 WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency voted 4 to 2 to recommend approval of this comprehensive plan amendment to the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS, this Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets the criteria established in Chapter 163.3187(1)(c), FS, for "small scale development amendments", and WHEREAS, the -Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Public Hearing on June 20, 2000, after advertising pursuant to Chapter 163.3187(1)(c), FS and Chapter 125.66(4), FS; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 0 to continue that public hearing on July 11, 2000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: SECTION 1. rnmp=bensive Plan Amendment Adopljon and Transmittal The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 is hereby adopted as a small scale development amendment, and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. SECTION 2. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida to wit: Commencing at the northeast comer of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, run north 89°5345" west a distance of 958.24 feet; then run south 00°09149" out a distance of 248.99 feet to the point of beginning of the following described parcel; then continue south 00°09149" east a distance of 419.98 feet; then run south 89050'1 V west a distance of 65.00 feet; then run north 00013'15" west a distance of 419.98 feet, then run north 89050'11" east a distance of 65.37 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.63 acres more or less. is changed from C/I, Commercial/Industrial, to L-1, Low -Density Residential- 1(up to 3 units/acre), and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly. WED The land use designation of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida to wit: JULY 119 2000 -76- BK 114 PG 092 • ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 021 Commencing at the northeast comer of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, Run North 89°5345" west a distance of 958.24 feet; then run south 0009149" east a distance of 43.62 feet to the point of beginning of the following described parcel; then continue south OOo09'49" east a distance of 205.37 feet; then run north 89050'11" east a distance of 126.36 feet; then run north 0049'49" west a distance of 229.49 feet to the southerly right-of-way of State Road 512, then run along state road 512 right-of-way along a non -radial curve concave to the northwest, having an arc length of 128.66 feet, a radius of 2,060.00 feet and an arc angle of 03°3443", a chord bearing of south 79°01'40" west and a chord distance of 128.64 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.63 acres more or less. is changed from L-1, Low -Density Residential-1(up to 3 units/acre), to C/I, Commercial/Industrial, and the Future Land Use Map is hereby revised accordingly. SECTION 3. Rpeal of Conflicting Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict SECTION 4. Ceverability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that if any provision of this ordinance and therefore, the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendment is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. SECTION 5. Pffective Date Unless challenged, the effective date of this ordinance, and therefore, this plan amendment, shall be August 11, 2000. If challenged, the effective date of this ordinance, and therefore, this plan amendment, shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 7s' day of June, 2000, for a public hearing to be held on the 2e day of June, 2000, at which time the Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 0 to continue the public hearing on July 11, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ti ppi n , seconded by Commissioner Macht , and adopted by the following vote: JULY 119 2000 -77- KK 114 PG 093 • I ORDINANCE NO. 2000 - Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Nav Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht APP Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge AMP Commissioner John W. Tippet Ave BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF IRIDIAN RIVER COUNTY 9MOV-9-WIM110 I ATTEST BY: L� yBarton, C (� This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: a--ts APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS aert Keating, AICP Community Development D' for cd\u\v\j\lu\bryantl\luda-ord.wpd JULY 119 2000 IN L7/v'fe %�r"v1 William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney iman give Cs Aatrroved Date Admin. U073Legai Budget Dept BK 114 PC 094 BK 114 PC 094 0 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board, by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn opposed) adopted Ordinance 2000-022 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for ±0.63 acres located ±249 feet south of CR -512 and ±235 feet east of CR -510, from CG to A -l; and amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for ±0.63 acres located on the south side of CR -512, ±300 feet east of CR - 510 from A-1 to CG (Paradise Partners, Inc.). J ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 022 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ±249 FEET SOUTH OF CR 512 AND ±235 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM CG TO A-1; AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±0.63 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CR 512,±300 FEET EAST OF CR 510, FROM A-1 TO CG; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; JULY 119 2000 -79- 61{ 1 14 PG 095 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 022 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, run north 89053'45" west a distance of 958.24 feet; then run south 00°09149" east a distance of 248.99 feet to the point of beginning of the following described parcel; then continue south 0049'49" east a distance of 419.98 feet; then run south 89o50'1 V west a distance of 65.00 feet; then run north 00013'15" west a distance of 419.98 feet, then run north 89050'11" east a distance of 65.37 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.63 acres more or less. Be changed from CG, General Commercial District, to A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres); I:`INk 1 -11 The zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, Run North 89053145" west a distance of 958.24 feet; then run south OOoO9'49" east a distance of 43.62 feet to the point of beginning of the following described parcel; then continue south 00009'49" east a distance of 205.37 feet; then run north 89050'11" east a distance of 126.36 feet; then run north 00009'49" west a distance of 229.49 feet to the southerly right-of-way of State Road 512, then run along state road 512 right-of-way along a non -radial curve concave to the northwest, having an arc length of 128.66 feet, a radius of 2,060.00 feet and an arc angle of 03034'43", a chord bearing of south 79001'40" west and a chord distance of 128.64 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.63 acres more or less. Be changed from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to CG, General Commercial District. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. Effective Date: The effective date of this ordinance shall be the same as the effective date for the related comprehensive plan amendment, Ordinance #2000- 021 . If the related comprehensive plan amendment, Ordinance #2000- 021 , is not challenged, the effective date of this rezoning ordinance shall be August 11, 2000. If the related comprehensive plan amendment, Ordinance #2000-021 is challenged, the effective date of this rezoning ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the comprehensive plan amendment in compliance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this l ld' day of July, 2000. JULY 119 2000 -80- 8K 114 PG 096 I ORDINANCE NO. 2000-022 This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Joumal on the 7* day of June, 2000, for a public hearing to be held on the 2& day of June, 2000, at which time the Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 0 to continue the public hearing on July 11, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ti ppi n , seconded by Commissioner Macht and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Nay Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht _Aye Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge _dye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY!,:Sn,', J6 0'�Q�-� Fran B. Adams, Chairman ATTEST BY: y BartF This ordinance was filed with the Dep ent of Stateollowing date: -7-20- Q&&U APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY K��-4 William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Obert M. Keating, AICY Community Developm t Dir r cd\u\v\j\lu\bryantl\tzon-ord.wpd JULY 119 2000 -si- M&MRtwrCa Au J. ca Date Admin S 3 Legat Buaget Dept. Risk Mgr. BK 114 PG 097 9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2000-072 AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OF REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY (A) CARSON PLATT - REDESIGNATING ±5,361 ACRES FROM AG -1 AND AG -2 TO C-1 AND REZONING THOSE ±5,361 ACRES FROM A-1 AND A-2 TO CON -1; (B) BERRY GROVES - REDESIGNATING ±3,288 ACRES FROM AG -2 TO C-1 AND REZONING THOSE ±3}288 ACRES FROM A-2 TO CON -1: (C) PELICAN ISLAND NWR - REDESIGNATING ±44.4 ACRES FROM L-1 TO C-1 AND REZONING THOSE ±44.4 ACRES FROM A-1 TO CON -1; AND (D) WOMEN'S CLUB TRACT - REDESIGNATING ±20 ACRES FROM L-2 TO C-1 AND REZONING THOSE ±20 ACRES FROM RS -3 TO CON-1(LegislativeI PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 16, 2000: JULY 11, 2000 -82- • TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE obert M. Keating, CP; ommuni evelopment Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning S -y( //- FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Plannin5r41 DATE: June 16, 2000 RE: County Initiated Request to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate 4:5,361 Acres from AG -1 and AG -2 to C-1, And to Rezone Those (5,361 Acres From A-1 and A-2 to Con -1; to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate +3,288 Acres From AG -2 to C-1, And to Rezone Those +-3,288 Acres From A-2 to Con -1; to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate +44.4 Acres From L-1 to C-1, And to Rezone Those +44.4 Acres From A-1 to Con -1; And to Amend The Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate +20 Acres From L-2 to C-1, And to Rezone Those t20 Acres From RS -3 to Con -1 PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 20-01-0081 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 11, 2000. This is a county initiated request involving four separate parcels, each of which contains environmentally sensitive and environmentally important land now under some form of public ownership. Figures 1 to 8 at the end of this staff report show the locations, land use designations, and zoning districts of the subject properties. Summarized in the table below, this request involves changing both the land use designation and the zoning of each site. The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary land use designation and zoning to reflect the subject properties' public ownership and to ensure that the subject properties' environmental significance will be preserved. On May 11, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to redesignate and rezone the subject properties. JULY 11, 2000 -83- R114PG099 • TABLE 1 SUBJECT SUBJECT SUBJECT SUBJECT PROPERTY 1 PROPERTY 2 PROPERTY 3 PROPERTY 4 KNOWN AS Carson Platt Estate Berry Groves Pelican Island NWR Women's Club Tract GENERAL Northwest of the Southeast comer of 77" West side of Jungle West side of 58" LOCATION intersection of 1-95 and Street and 130 Avenue Trail, North of Windsor Avenue, *660 feet south CR 512 of 490 Strcrot SIZE IN ACRES 5,361 3,288 "A 20 CURRENT AG -1, Agricultural -I (up AG -2. Agricultural -2 (up L-1, Low -Density L-2, Low -Density LAND USE to 1 unit/5 acres), and to i unit/ 10 acres) Residential -1 (up to 3 Residential -2 (up to 6 DESIGNATION AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up unttslacre) unitstaere) to 1 unit/ 10 acres) PROPOSED C-1, Publicly Owned or C-1, Publicly Owned or C-1, Publicly Owned or C-1, Publicly Owned or LAND USE Controlled Controlled Conservation -1 Controlled Controlled DESIGNATION Conservation -1 (zero (zero density) Conservation -1 (zero Conservation -1 (zero density) density) density) CURRENT A-1, Agricultural Dist. A-2. Agricultural Dist. (up A-1, Agricultural Dist. RS -3, Single -Family ZONING (up to I unit/5 acres), & to 1 unit/10 acres) (up to 1 unit/5 acres) Residential Dist. (up to 3 A-2, Agricultural Dist. uniwacre) (up to 1 unit/10 acres) PROPOSED Con -1, Public Lands Con -1, Public Lands Con -1, Public Lands Con -1, Public Lands ZONING Conservation District I Conservation District Conservation District I Conservation District (zero density) (zero density) (zero density) (zero density) Subject Property 1 Subject Property 1 is part of the ±22,000 acre St. Sebastian Buffer Preserve. That preserve includes land adjacent to Subject Property 1 on the north, in Brevard County, and on the east (The Coraci Tract in Indian River County). Containing pine flatwoods, wetlands, and scrub habitat, the St. Sebastian Buffer Preserve, including Subject Property 1, is nearly completely undeveloped. The portion of the preserve located in Brevard County is zoned either AU, Agricultural Use, or GU, General Use. To the South of Subject Property 1, land at the northwest corner of I-95 and CR 512 is vacant and is zoned CG, General Commercial District. Recently annexed into the City of Fellsmere, land on the south side of CR 512, west of I-95, is also vacant. Prior to the annexation, that land was in the unincorporated county and was zoned A-1. Further west along the north side of CR 512 is the I, Industrial, zoned MESA Park entertainment complex, also in the City of Fellsmere. West of Subject Property 1, land is zoned either A-1 or A-2, and uses include citrus groves, vacant land, and residences on large lots. Subject Property 2 Subject Property 2 consists of two parts—the western portion between 130'h Avenue and 122'd Avenue, and the eastern portion between 122' Avenue and I-95. The western portion consists of inactive citrus groves which the St. Johns River Water Management District plans to restore to a natural use. Abutting those inactive groves on the south are wetlands associated with the St. Johns Marsh. Those wetlands are zoned Con -1. More citrus groves, apparently also inactive, abut Subject Property 2 on the west. Those groves are zoned A-2. West of 122'd Avenue, land north of Subject Property 2 is zoned A-1 and contains single-family residences on large lots. East of 1221d Avenue, land is undeveloped and consists of wetlands and heavily wooded uplands. The property bordering the northern boundary of the eastern JULY 119 2000 -84- BKil4PG000 r� part of Subject Property 2 was recently annexed into the City of Fellsmere. Prior to the annexation, that land was zoned A-2. The property bordering the southern boundary of the eastern part of Subject Property 2 is also zoned A-2. Land east of Subject Property 2, across I-95, is zoned A-1. Subject Property 3 Bordered by the Con -1 zoned estuarine wetlands of the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge on the west, Subject Property 3 is zoned A-1 and consists of inactive citrus groves and jurisdictional wetlands. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service intends to use Subject Property 3 for wetland restoration or to buffer existing wetlands. The lands to the east of the site consist of citrus groves and are zoned A-1. Subject Property 4 Subject Property 4 contains heavily wooded uplands. To the south of Subject Property 4, land is zoned RS -3 and contains citrus groves or single-family residences on large lots. Abutting Subject Property 4 on the west is the RS -3 zoned Lindsey Pines Subdivision of single-family residences. Abutting Subject Property 4 on the north is an ±20 acre tract that is zoned A-1 and contains one single-family residence. To the east of Subject Property 4, across 58`h Avenue, land is zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), and contains single-family residences. Subject Property 1 Subject Property 1 and lands to the west are designated either AG -1, Agricultural -1, or AG -2, Agricultural -2, on the county's future land use map. The AG -1 designation permits agricultural uses and residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/5 acres. The AG -2 designation permits agricultural uses and residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/10 acres. The southwest portion of Subject Property 1 abuts the MESA Park entertainment complex in the City of Fellsmere. The MESA Park property is currently designated I, Industrial, on the City of Fellsmere's future land use map. South of Subject Property 1, across CR 512, is the land that was recently annexed into the City of Fellsmere. Prior to the annexation, the county's land use designation for most of that land was AG - 1. The exception is at the southwest comer I-95 and CR 512. Prior to the annexation, the county's land use designation for land at the southwest comer I-95 and CR 512 was C/I, Commercial/Industrial. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts. Land at the northwest comer of I-95 and CR 512 is designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on the county's future land use map. Most lands abutting Subject Property 1 on the east are designated C-1, Publicly Owned or Controlled Conservation -1 (zero density). The C-1 designation permits conservation and passive recreational uses. Land to the north of Subject Property 1, in Brevard County, is designated AG, Agricultural, on Brevard County's future land use map. The AG designation permits agricultural uses and residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/acre. Subject Property 2 Subject Property 2 and adjacent properties to the east and west are designated AG -2 on the county's future land use map. The exception is land east of I-95 which is designated AG -1. Lands north of the western portion of Subject Property 2 are also designated AG -1. Lands north of the eastern JULY 119 2000 -85- BK 114 PG 101 • -I portion of Subject Property 2 were recently annexed into the City of Fellsmere. Prior to the annexation, the county's land use designation for that land was AG -2. Lands south of the western portion of Subject Property 2 are designated C-1. Lands south of the eastern portion of Subject Property 2 are designated AG -2. Subject Property 3 Subject Property 3 and lands to the east, across Jungle Trail, are designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on the county's future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. Other lands surrounding Subject Property 3 are designated C-1. Subject Property 4 Subject Property 4 and lands to the north, south, and west, are designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, on the county's future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 6 unitslacre. To the east of Subject Property 4, across 58'h Avenue, land is designated M-2, Medium -Density Residential -2, on the county's future land use map. The M-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 10 units/acre. Subject Property 1 Subject Property 1 contains ±1,072 acres of freshwater wetlands and ±4,289 acres of native upland plant communities (pine flatwoods and scrub). The site contains habitat for several federally threatened and endangered species, including bald eagles, red -cockaded woodpeckers, Florida scrub jays, and sand hill cranes. Much of Subject Property 1 is within an "A" 100 year floodplain, with an undetermined minimum base flood elevation requirement. Subject Property 2 Containing both freshwater wetlands and native upland plant communities, Subject Property 2 is managed by the St. Johns River Water Management District to reduce phosphorus loading into the Blue Cypress Water Management Area, and to protect and manage endangered species' habitat. Large portions of Subject Property 2 are within an "A" 100 year floodplain, with an undetermined minimum base flood elevation requirement. Subject Property 3 Located adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon and its estuarine wetlands, Subject Property 3 consists of inactive citrus groves and jurisdictional wetlands. The property is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of eight feet NGVD- Subject Property 4 Subject Property 4 consists of dense pine flatwoods, a native upland habitat. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the site is located outside of a flood hazard area. Utilities and Services Subject Property 1 Located outside of the county's urban service area, neither water nor wastewater lines extend to the site. JULY 119 2000 -86- 14 PG !0 0 Subject Property 2 Located outside of the county's urban service area, neither water nor wastewater lines extend to the site. Subject Property 3 Currently, neither water nor sewer lines extend to the site. County plans, however, call for both water and wastewater lines to extend along Jungle Trail to the site by May 2001. The water lines will connect to the North County Water Plant, while wastewater lines will connect to the North County Wastewater Treatment Plant. Subject Property 4 Water lines extend along 58`" Avenue to Subject Property 4 from the North County Water Plant, while wastewater lines extend to the site from the Central County Wastewater Treatment Plant. Trsne11nrt9 ion SYMM Subject Property 1 Subject Property 1 can be accessed from CR 512, a two-lane road with approximately 80 feet of public road right-of-way. The segment of CR 512 adjacent to Subject Property 1 is classified as a rural major collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. No improvements to this section of CR 512 are currently programmed. Subject Property 2 Subject Property 2 can be accessed from 130' Avenue which is a two-lane unpaved road with approximately 40 feet of public road right-of-way. Currently, there are no plans to expand this portion of 130` Avenue. Subject Property 3 Jungle Trail borders Subject Property 3 on the east and provides the only automobile access to the site. A two-lane unpaved local road, Jungle Trail has been designated by the county as an historic and scenic road with special building setbacks and vegetation protection areas along its entire length. The public road right-of-way for the segment of Jungle Trail abutting Subject Property 3 ranges from 15 feet to 20 feet. Subject Property 4 Subject Property 4 abuts 58`h Avenue, a two-lane paved road with approximately 80 feet of public road right-of-way. This segment of 58' Avenue is classified as an urban principal arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map and is programmed to expand to 130 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020. In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. This section will include the following: • an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the proposed amendment's compatibility with surrounding areas; • an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and • an analysis of the proposed amendment's potential impact on environmental quality. JULY 119 2000 { 114 PG 103 -87- Only Subject Properties 3 and 4 are located within the County Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained, the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed. For land use designation amendment requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency determination application process. As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not increase land use density or intensity are exempt from concurrency requirements. For the subject request, ±1,740 acres of AG -1 designated land, ±6909 acres of AG -2 designated land, ±20 acres of L-2 designated land, and ±44.4 acres of L-1 designated land with a total development potential of ±1,290 units will be replaced with ±8,713.4 acres of C-1 designated land. Since C-1 designated property has zero density, the proposed amendment will result in a decrease of ±1,290 units in the overall development potential of the subject properties. Because of that overall decrease in land use intensity of±1,290 units, this land use amendment request is exempt from concurrency review. It is important to note that adoption of the proposed land use amendment will not impact any public facilities or services. Under the requested C-1 land use designation, there will be no development on the subject properties except for minor facilities associated with passive recreation activities. For that reason, the subject request will enhance compatibility between the sites and surrounding land uses. In contrast to the ±1,290 units allowed under the existing land use designations, development under the requested land use designation will be limited to conservation uses and passive recreational uses. In terms of traffic, noise, and aesthetics, the impacts associated with uses allowed under the proposed C-1 land use designation will be significantly less than those that would occur with development under the existing land use designations. In fact, the passive recreational uses allowed under the requested zoning district will serve as an amenity for nearby residential uses. Additionally, because Subject Properties 1, 2, and 3 are located adjacent to existing conservation areas, the request works to enhance the environmental quality of those areas. For these reasons, staff has determined that the requested land use amendment is compatible with the surrounding area. Land use amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the land development regulations, the "comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), FS." Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes JULY 119 2000 -88- nu DR 114PC 101l agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions—including plan amendment and rezoning decisions. While all comprehensive plan objectives and policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following policies. Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 In evaluating a land use amendment request, the most important consideration is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria are: do • The proposed amendment will convect a mistake in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; • The proposed amendment is wan -anted based on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject Property; or • The proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land use designations at separate sites and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed land use amendment meets the policy's second and third criteria. On February 13, 1990, when the comprehensive plan was adopted, Subject Properties 1, 2, and 3 were privately owned. At that time, those sites were correctly designated for agricultural or residential uses. Since then, those sites have been purchased for conservation purposes. The acquisition of Subject Properties 1, 2, and 3 by public agencies constitutes a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject properties and meets the third criterion of Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. In contrast to the other sites which were privately owned when the plan was adopted, Subject Property 4 has been owned by the county since 1939. Due to an oversight, however, Subject Property 4 was designated L-2 instead of C-1. By designating the site C-1, the proposed amendment corrects an oversight in the approved plan and meets Policy 14.3s second criterion. For those reasons, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. JULY 119 2000 -89- BK 114 PG 105 Future Land Use Element Policies 1.5 and 1.6 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.5 states that the conservation land use designations are applied to those areas which are vital or essential to the normal fimctions of ecosystems and have been identified in the Conservation Element as meriting preservation. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.6 limits the use of C-1 designated land to conservation and passive recreational uses. As publicly owned sites containing wetlands and native upland habitat, each of the subject properties meets those criteria. For those reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policies 1.5 and 1.6. As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the proposed land use designation amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The sites' existing land use designations offer only limited environmental protections. Development of residentially zoned land would be required to preserve only 10 or 15 percent of the upland habitat of the sites. Being exempt from the upland preservation requirement, agricultural development of agriculturally zoned land could result in the removal of all upland habitat on site. In contrast, under the proposed land use designation, the entire area of each site will be preserved, and development will be limited to conservation and compatible passive recreational uses. Although the sites are publicly owned and could be developed as public parks under the existing land use designations, the proposed land use designation provides the sites with additional protection from development. By prohibiting most types of development on the sites, the proposed request will ensure that the environmental quality of the sites will be preserved. e For these reasons, the proposed land use amendment is anticipated to positively impact the environmental quality of the subject properties. Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the proposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan, compatible with all surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts on the provision of public services. The proposed changes work to ensure the preservation of environmentally sensitive and important habitat. For these reasons, staff supports the request. Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners authorize transmitting the proposed amendment to DCA by adopting the attached resolution. JULY 11, 2000 BK 114 PG 106 0 Figure 1: Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 1 Figure 2: Location and Zoning of Subject Property 1 JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG , 0 7 -91- ;ure 3: Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Propert7 JULY 119 2000 0 Figure 4: Location and Zoning of Subject Property 2 AG -1 A-2 AG -2 �, A-1 z C-1 AG -2 C/I A -IT U City of Cll CR S12 A-2 Fellsme Fellame L-1 RS -3 L-1 City of City of v. Felismere AG -1 Felismere d AG -2 > d AG -1 A-2 A-1 ■A U d U � CON -1 CON -1 d C-1 N AG -2 C-1 N en JULY 119 2000 0 Figure 4: Location and Zoning of Subject Property 2 -92- 6K 114 PG 108 0 I A-2 A-1 z A -IT U City of as CR 512 A-2 Fellame RS -3 City of A-1 Felismere d d A-2 A-1 ■A U d = A-2 CON -1 CON -1 r -92- 6K 114 PG 108 0 I �J Figure 5: Location and Land Use Designation Figure 6: Location and Zoning of Subject JULY 119 2000 -93- • BK 114 PG 109 JULY 119 2000 Figure 7: Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property A Figure 8: Location and Zoning of Subject Property 4 A-1 N 49th Street RS -6 BK 114 PG I 10 -94- 0 k • GENERAL Applicant: Indian River County Location: NW of the intersection of I-95 and CR 512 Acreage: ±5,361 F-xistin,g T.and I ice Desiag to ion.._: AG -1, Agricultural -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres), and AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit/ 10 acres) Rcq , .t .d Land Use D ..i a ion: C-1, Public Conservation -1 (zero density) Fxkting Zoning: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), and A-2, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/10 acres) Requested Zoning: Con -1, Public Conservation District (zero density) Fxi. i gT . nndd_I lse: undeveloped mix of uplands and wetlands ADJACENT LAND North: Brevard County, St. Sebastian Buffer Preserve SmAh: Agriculture & single-family on large lots, zoned A-1 East: St. Sebastian Buffer Preserve, zoned Con -1; CR 512/1-95 C/I node West: Agriculture & single-family on large lots, zoned A-1 & A-2 INFRASTRUCTURE Outside urban service area; no water or sewer available; access from CR 512 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Staff t 'ontact: John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 28, 2000 # of Surrounding E== Owners Notified: 26 Date Notification Mailed- June 23, 2000 Date Sign Posted: June 23, 2000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the request PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approval (6-0) JULY 119 2000 -95- BK 1 1 4 PG I I I • GENERAL Applicant: Indian River County i.o ration: SE corner of 77t' Street and 130`" Avenue Acreage: ±3,288 Existing Land Tseesig an tion: AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit/10 acres) Requested T.2nd I Ise Deni g an tion: C-1, Public Conservation -1 (zero density) Rxis i g Zoning: A-2, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/ 10 acres) Requested Zoning: Con -1, Public Conservation District (zero density) Existi gl Land Use: undeveloped mix of uplands and wetlands ADJACENT LAND North: A-1 zoned ranchettes west of 122' Avenue; vacant to the east, Fellsmere Smith: C-1 zoned marsh west of 122 Avenue; A-2 zoned vacant to the east Fast: A-1 zoned vacant across I-95 3K=: A-2 zoned inactive groves INFRASTRUCTURE Outside urban service area; no water or sewer available; access from 130`s Avenue PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Staff Contact: John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 28, 2000 # of S n -o ending E== Owners Notified: 17 Date Notification Mailed: June 23, 2000 Date Sig13 Posted: June 23, 2000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the request PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approval (6-0) JULY 119 2000 N 1 1 4 PG 112 0 -96- 0 GENERAL Applicant: Indian River County Location: West side of Jungle Trail, North of Windsor Ac!TP�: ±44.4 ExistingJand I lse Desig an tion: L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre) RRcq tested Land I Ise Desig an tion: C-1, Public Conservation -1 (zero density) Existing .o in : A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) Ren�esred 7oning; Con -1, Public Conservation District (zero density) Fxicting . nd I Ise: Inactive citrus groves and jurisdictional wetlands ADJACENT LAND North & West: Con -1 zoned estuarine wetlands of the Pelican Island NWR South: Indian River Lagoon East: Jungle Trail and A-1 zoned citrus groves INFRASTRUCTURE Water and sewer will be available by May 2001; access from Jungle Trail PUBLIC NOTIFICATION StaffC•ontact: John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 28, 2000 #of Surrounding R=c= Owners Notified: 5 Date Notification Mailed: June 23, 2000 Date Sign Posted: June 23, 2000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the request PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approval (6-0) JULY 11, 2000 -97- QKII4PG!!3 GENERAL Applicant: Indian River County Location: West side of 58`h Avenue, ±660 feet south of 49`h Street Acreage: ±20 Existing Land I Tse Desi agn do g: L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre) Requested T.and Tlse Desig an tion: C-1, Public Conservation -1 (zero density) FXigin9 70 ;n : RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) Requested Toning: Con -1, Public Conservation District (zero density) Existing Land Ilse: undeveloped uplands ADJACENT LAND North: 1 residence on t20 acres, zoned A-1 South: Citrus groves and single-family residences on large lots, zoned RS -3 East: Single-family homes, zoned RS -6 West: Lindsey Pines single-family subdivision, zoned RS -3 INFRASTRUCTURE Water and sewer lines extend to the site; access is from 58`b Avenue PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Staff Contact: John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 28, 2000 # of Surrounding Propaty Owners Notified: 15 Date Notification Mailed: June 23, 2000 Daft C ga Posted: June 23, 2000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the request PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approval (6-0) JULY 11, 2000 -98- B1% 1 14 PC 114 Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed the Comp Plan amendment process, advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on this amendment request. If the Board approves the transmittal of this application to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in Tallahassee for their 60 -day review, a second and final public hearing will be scheduled to consider any comments made by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comp Plan. If the Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA, the application process will come to an end. Commissioner Stanbridge asked for clarification that no facilities are allowed on these lands unless they are recreational in nature, and Director Keating confirmed that any use has to be consistent with the conservation designation. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding this matter. Ray Jackson, Post Office Box 307, Vero Beach, noted that 12 to 15 years ago the County had attempted to construct a sewage treatment plant on one of the parcels and questioned the permitted uses. Director Keating advised that the allowed uses would include conservation, education, and recreation. Commissioner Stanbridge noted that the parcels will be turned over to a conservation land manager. The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. JULY 11, 2000 BK 114 PG 1 i 5 ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-072 approving the transmittal of a proposed amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs for its review ([a] Carson Platt; [b] Berry Groves; [c] Pelican Island NWR; and [d] Women's Club Tract). RESOLUTION NO. 2000-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its January 2000 amendment submittal window, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan amendment request on May 11, 2000, after due public notice, and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit the comprehensive plan amendment listed below; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal Public Hearing on July 11, 2000, after advertising pursuant to F.S. 163.3184(15)(b)(1), and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment process. JULY 119 2000 -100- BK I 14 PG 116 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 072 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: 1. The above recitals are ratified in their entirety. 2. The following proposed amendment is approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs: a. Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from AG -1, Agricultural -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres), and AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit/10 acres), to C-1, Publicly Owned Conservation -1 (zero density), for 15,361 acres located northwest of the intersection of I-95 and CR 512; and b. Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from AG -2, Agricultural -2 (up to 1 unit/10 acres), to C-1, Publicly Owned Conservation -1 (zero density), for ±3,288 acres located between I-95 and 130'h Avenue, south of the City of Fellsmere; and c. Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from L-1, Low - Density Residential -1 (up to 3 unitstacre), to C-1, Publicly Owned Conservation -1 (zero density), for±44.4 acres located on the west side of Jungle Trail, north of Windsor; and d. Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from L-2, Low - Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre), to C-1, Publicly Owned Conservation -1 (zero density), for±20 acres located on the west side of 58`" Avenue, south of 49d' Street. JULY 119 2000 -101- BKII4PG117 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 072 The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Macht and seconded by Commissioner Gi nn and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R Macht Ayp Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Ave Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye_ The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held this l Ph day of July 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney JULY 119 2000 -102- APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development irector cd\u\v\j\lu\santa\transmit-res.wpd 8K 114 PG 118 • 9.A.6. PUBLIC HEARING - SANTA MARIA OF VERO DEVELOPMENT, INC. REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±17.8 ACRES FROM M-1 TO C/I AND TO REZONE THOSE ±17.8 ACRES FROM RM -8 TO CG (,Legislative2 PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 30,,2000: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE Obert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Di ector,/ THROUGH: Sasan Rohan4 AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: John Wachteld "� Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning DATE: June 30, 2000 RE: Santa Maria of Vero Development, Inc., Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate 117.8 acres from M-1 to CA, and to Rezone those 117.8 acres from RM -8 to CG PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 20-01-0176 JULY 119 2000 -103- BK 114 PG 119 • It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 11, 2000. This request involves f 17.8 acres located at the southeast comer of 26`, Street and 58' Avenue, and depicted in Figures 1 and 2. The request is to change the land use designation from M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 of the subject property to rezone that property (� to 8 umts/acre), to C/I, Commercial/Industrial, and P Ply from RM -8 Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 unitsiacre), to CG, zoning necessary to develop the site with retail commercial uses. General Commercial District. The purpose of this request is to secure the land use designation and Figure 1: Land Use Desianatinin ari.4 r ,.,....;,._ _r.L_ - . _ JULY 119 2000 lit 114 PG 12 0 -104- 0 0 0 JULY 119 2000 -105- BK 1 14 PG 121 On March 19, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 0 redesignate the subject property from L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre), to M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre); and to rezone the site from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 unitstacre). On May 13, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted site plan approval for a 153 unit multiple -family project on the subject property. On April 11, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners extended the expiration date of that site plan approval to May 13, 2001. That site plan has not yet been released for construction. Although the number of plan amendments that a local government may consider is not limited, the frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is regulated by state law. According to Florida Statutes, plan amendments are limited to twice per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts general plan amendment applications only during the `window" months of January and July. In this case, the subject application was one of four applications submitted during the January 2000 window. The procedures for reviewing comprehensive plan amendments involve several steps. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission, as the Local Planning Agency, conducts a public hearing to review the request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of or deny any associated rezoning request. If the rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, unless the denial to rezone is appealed Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, the Board of County Commissioners conducts two public hearings. The first of those hearings is for a preliminary decision on the land use amendment request. At that hearing, the Board determines whether or not the land use amendment warrants transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for further consideration. A Board of County Commissioners decision not to transmit the land use amendment to DCA constitutes denial of both the land use amendment and rezoning requests. If the land use amendment is transmitted, DCA conducts a review which includes soliciting comments from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, several state agencies, and neighboring local governments. After its review, DCA compiles its objections, if it has any, in an Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report, and transmits that report to the county. After staff addresses any issues that were raised in the ORC Report, the second and final Board of County Commissioners public hearing is conducted. The Board takes final action to approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests at that time. If the Board approves the requests, the effective date of the adoption ordinances is when the land use amendment is found "in compliance" by DCA. Planning and 7.oning Cnmmiscion Action On May 11, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to take the following actions: 1) Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny this request to redesignate the subject property; and 2) Deny the request to rezone the subject property. JULY 119 2000 -106- QK 114 PG 122 The Planning and Zoning Commission denial of the rezoning portion of the request has been appealed. At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to review the subject request and determine whether to transmit it to DCA for review, or to deny the request. Consisting of an abandoned grove, the subject property is zoned RM -8. Land abutting the site on the east is zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), and consists of a single-family subdivision. The Ryanwood Shopping Center borders the site on the south. That shopping center is zoned CG, General Commercial District. To the west of the site, across 58th Avenue, land is zoned RS -6, and is developed with a church and a single-family subdivision. An electrical substation has been approved, but not yet constructed, at the southwest corner of 58`h Avenue and 26th Street. In this area of the county, 26t° Street is the boundary between the city of Vero Beach and unincorporated Indian River County. Consequently, the property to the north of the subject p across 26 Street, is within the Veno Beach city limits. That property is zoned R-lAproperty, , SingleFamily Residential District, on the city's zoning map. The density of that property, is governed by the land use designation, which in this case allows up to 5 unitslacre. Currently, that land is heavily wooded and undeveloped The subject property and properties to the west are designated M-1 on the county's future land use map. The M-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. Land abutting the subject Property on the south, is designated C/I, Commercial/ Industrial on the county's future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts. East of the site, land is designated L-2 on the county's future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 6 unitslacre The land north of the subject property in the City of Vero Beach is designated RL, Residential Low, on the city's future land use map. The RL designation permits residential uses with densities up to 5 units/acre. Being a site that has been cleared for agriculture, the subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. No wetlands or native upland plant communities exist on site. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard areas. The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater service is available to the site from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water service is available to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. The property's west boundary abuts 58th Avenue which is classified as an urban principal arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of 581h Avenue is a four lane paved road with approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of-way. Currently, there are no plans to expand this portion of 58`h Avenue. JULY 119 2000 -107- 11K114PG123 The Indian River Farms Water Control District owns 30 feet of canal right-of-way between the subject property and 26* Street, along the property's north boundary. With District permission, 26`h Street could provide access to the subject property. Classified as a collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 26`h Street is a two lane road with approximately 80 feet of existing public road right-of-way. Currently, there are no plans to expand this portion of 26`h Street. In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. Specifically, this section will include: • an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; • an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; and • an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Element Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations also require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested land use designation. For commercial Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, the most intense use (according to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1"6 and the county's Land Development Regulations) is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for redesignation. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: 2. Existing Land Use Designation: 3. Proposed Land Use Designation: 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property under Current Land Use Designation: *17.8 acres M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre) CA, Commercial/Industrial 142 Dwelling Units (DUs) S. Most Intense Use of Subject Property under Proposed Land Use Designation: 178,000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6th Edition ITE JULY 119 2000 Manual). -108- K114PG124 Transportation As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever is less. According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of a 178,000 square foot shopping center on the subject property. Attachment 4 of this staff report contains a more detailed transportation concurrency analysis. Water A retail commercial use of 178,000 square feet on the subject property will have a water consumption rate of 53 Equivalent Residential units (ERU), or 13,333.5 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Water lines extend to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 4,500,000 gallons/day and therefore can accommodate the potable water demand associated with the proposed amendment. Wastewater The subject property is serviced by the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed amendment, development of the property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 53 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 13,333.5 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. The West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 1,000,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the proposed amendment. Solid Waste Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. For a 178,000 square foot commercial development on the subject site, solid waste generation will be approximately 889 waste generation units (WGU) annually. A WGU is a Waste Generation Unit measurement equivalent to one ton (2,000 pounds) of solid waste. Using the accepted conversion rate of one cubic yard for every 1,200 pounds of compacted solid waste generated, the 178,000 square feet of commercial development would be expected to generate 1,482 cubic yards of wastelyear. A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of more than 822,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on staff analysis, it was determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the proposed amendment. JULY 119 2000 -109- 6K 114 PG 125 Drainage All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property does not lie within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply. With the most intense use of this site under the proposed amendment, the maximum area of impervious surface would be approximately 387,684 square feet, or 8.9 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 491,966 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain approximately 362,883 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is 69.28 cubic feet/second. Based upon staffs analysis, the drainage level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and requiring retention of the 362,883 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property. As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process. Recreation Recreation concurrency requirements apply only to residential development. Therefore, this comprehensive plan amendment request would not be required to satisfy recreation concurrency requirements. Concurrency Summary Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid waste, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation. While all services and facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation, this positive concurrency test is not an indication that the subject property is appropriate for commercial development. Passing the concurrency test justifies the proposed land use amendment only if the proposed land use designation is consistent with all other comprehensive plan policies and compatible with surrounding areas. In Indian River County, available capacity for services does not dictate development patterns; rather, the comprehensive plan dictates the location of services. Land use amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As per section 800.07(1) ofthe County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), F.S." Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses as depicted JULY 119 2000 SK 114 PG 12 -110- • on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, public, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development related decisions—including plan amendment decisions. While all Comprehensive Plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment requests. Of particular applicability to this land use plan amendment request are the goal, objectives and policies identified below. As indicated in the following analysis, the proposed amendment is not consistent with plan amendment criteria, is not consistent with the objective of establishing a residential/commercial corridor along SR 60, will encourage speculation and discourage infill development, and discourages the compatibility of adjacent land uses. Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with the county's Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria are: • the proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; • the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; • the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites, and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map; or • the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property. Staffs position is that this land use amendment request does not meet any of the criteria of Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. When the current Comprehensive Plan was approved on February 13, 1990, and updated as part of the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Process on March 17, 1998, the plan assigned commercial uses to commercial/industrial nodes. Those nodes were designated various sizes to reflect commercial demand and were established in certain areas to incorporate lands deemed suitable for commercial development. The subject property was considered for inclusion in the node at those times. When the comprehensive plan was adopted and recently updated, the subject property was not included in the node for the following reasons: • There was already sufficient land designated commercial/industrial to accommodate projected demand; • It was determined that including the site in the commercial/industrial node would produce a stip commercial development pattern along 58" Avenue. The county discourages that type of development pattern; • Given the shape (rectangular) and location (surrounded on three sides by residentially designated property) of the subject property, it was determined that including the site in the commercial/industrial node would adversely impact nearby residential areas; and JULY 119 2000 -111- BK 1 14 PG 1 2 7 • Given the size and shape of the subject property, residential development was determined to be feasible. For these reasons, it was determined that there was no mistake nor oversight in the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the applicant has not met the third criterion, since the applicant has not proposed a land use designation swap with another applicant owned parcel. With respect to the fourth criterion, there have been changes in circumstances affecting the subject property. The principal change was the construction of the Indian River Shopping Center, a 1.5 million square foot Development of Regional Impact which includes a 863,917 square foot regional mall. That change, however, does not wan -ant the proposed amendment. In fact, construction of the Indian River Mall has increased demand for nearby residential development. That increase has occurred due to both the conversion of residential land to commercial development and due to the jobs created by the commercial development. For these reasons, Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3's fourth criterion does not apply to the subject request. Because the proposed amendment does not meet any of the criteria identified above, the request is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Future Land Use Element Goal and Objective 1 The Future Land Use Element Goal and Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element both emphasize the importance of a controlled, orderly, compact and efficient land use pattern that efficiently uses public facilities and services. Infill development and redevelopment are important for the creation of an efficient and compact land use pattern. In this case, the proposed amendment discourages and inhibits infill development and redevelopment. That situation is due to market factors. Because commercially designated land generally has a higher value than residentially designated land, it is economically advantageous for a developer to buy less expensive residentially designated land and convert it to C/I designated land. To the extent that the county allows expansion of the SR 60/58`" Avenue node through the redesignation of residential land to commercial/industrial, the following negative impacts may occur. • Development of vacant commercially designated land in nearby nodes (such as the SR 60/1- 95 node), is discouraged. • Development of vacant commercially designated land in the SR 60/58` Avenue node is discouraged; • Redevelopment of vacant commercial buildings is discouraged (At this time the ±51,000 square foot former Service Merchandise building has been vacant for more than one year, and Winn Dixie recently closed its ±57,500 square foot store on SR 60. Both those buildings are located near the subject property.); and • Development of residentially designated land with residential uses is discouraged. For those reasons, redesignating the subject property to C/I does not encourage an efficient and compact land use pattern and is not consistent with the Goal and Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.21 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.21 states that node configuration shall provide for the most efficient use of land and of transportation facilities, while eliminating sprawl and strip development. By increasing commercial land along 58h Avenue, the proposed amendment expands the node in a linear or "strip" manner. JULY 119 2000 Bu 1 PG 28 Additionally, the proposed amendment encourages urban sprawl—a development pattern characterized by the inefficient use of land, infrastructure, natural resources, and economic resources. Strip commercial development is one type of urban sprawl. In fact, Rule 9J-5, FAC, specifically defines urban sprawl as a development pattern with the following characteristics: • strip commercial; • failure to maximize the use of public facilities; • large expanses of single -use development; or • discourages or inhibits infill development or redevelopment. The proposed amendment would produce development with all of the above characteristics; therefore, the proposed amendment encourages urban sprawl. Since the proposed amendment encourages strip commercial development, the inefficient use of transportation facilities, and urban sprawl, the proposed amendment is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.21. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 Policy 1.22 of the Future Land Use Element sets a minimum standard that must be met for C/I node expansion to occur. That policy states that no node shall be expanded unless 70% of the land area (less rights-of-way) is developed, or approved for development, with non-agricultural and non- residential uses, unless otherwise warranted According to the County's Commercial/Industrial Data Source, the subject node is 83% developed. Therefore, the subject request meets Future Land Use Policy 1.22's minimum standard. Meeting that minimum standard, however, does not indicate that the site is appropriate for commercial development. To be appropriate for commercial development, the site must also be compatible with surrounding areas, consistent with the entire comprehensive plan, and benefit the county's overall land use pattern. In this case, the proposed amendment does not meet those other criteria. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 sets a minimum separation distance between commercial/industrial nodes by stating that nodes shall not be expanded to within 1 %z miles of an existing commercial/industrial node. Granting the subject request would result in the expansion of the SR 60/58s' Avenue CommerciaUlndustrial Node to within V/e miles of the Gifford CommerciaWndustrial Node. For that reason, the proposed amendment is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23. Transportation Element Policy 11.1 Transportation Element Policy 11.1 states that the county will restrict urban sprawl, limit strip commercial development, and promote infill development. This policy promotes a complementary mix of uses. For example, several benefits occur when residential and commercial uses are near each other. Primary among those benefits is decreased traffic congestion due to fewer and shorter trips, increased feasibility of transit, and a greater percentage of pedestrian and bicycle trips. It has been demonstrated that the proposed amendment will promote urban sprawl and strip commercial development while discouraging infill development. For these reasons, the proposed amendment contradicts Transportation Element Policy 11.1. JULY 119 2000 -113- • BK 114 PG 129 Comprehensive Plan Consistency Summary While the referenced objectives and policies are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based on that analysis, staff determined that the request is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. In terms of noise, aesthetic concerns, and level of activity, the impacts of development under the C/I land use designation are greater than under the M-1 land use designation. That fact, however, does not imply that abutting commercial and residential developments are never compatible. In fact, it is inevitable that they abut in some areas. In those cases, several site design options, such as buffers, building orientation, and the placement of open space, can often mitigate impacts. Currently, commercial/industrial and residential land use designations abut along the subject property's south boundary. Because the site is a rectangularly shaped peninsula bounded on three sides by residentially designated land, granting the proposed amendment increases the length of the boundary between the commercial/indusVial and residential land use designations by ±2,600 feet. Since most incompatibilities occur at the border between land use designations, granting the request would likely result in an increase in incompatibilities. Additionally, because the subject property is currently undeveloped, new residential development on the subject property has site design options available to mitigate impacts from adjacent commercial development. In contrast, those site design options are not available to land abutting the subject property on the east because that land is already developed with single-family homes. Therefore, the proposed amendment would likely increase incompatibilities. Another negative impact from the proposed land use amendment involves more than the property itself; it relates to all undeveloped residentially designated areas within the SR 60 corridor, several of which currently abut existing residential development. Those areas include the 20 acre tract located approximately '/< mile west of 58" Avenue, on the south side of SR 60 (known as the Rodriguez Property); the 40 acre tract at the southeast comer of SR 60 and 66`h Avenue; and the 20 acre tract located at the southwest comer of SR 60 and Wh Avenue. Those areas would be affected because their circumstances are similar to those of the subject property. Each of those sites, including the subject property are: • located at or near an intersection of two major roads; • located near the Indian River Mall; • located adjacent to residentially designated land; • located adjacent to C/I designated land; • at least 20 acres in size; and • currently designated M-1. Because of the similarities among the sites, granting the requested change would provide an impetus for other property owners to request that their land use designation be changed to CIL Because the county must treat similar properties similarly, denying those requests would be difficult. The result would be C/I land use designations along most major roads within the SR 60 Corridor. This would allow a commercial strip development pattern. That type of development pattern not only is an indicator of urban sprawl, but also causes compatibility problems with adjacent residential areas. For these reasons, commercial/industrial development on the subject property would not be compatible with surrounding uses. JULY 11, 2000 M114PG130 The site has been cleared, and contains no environmentally important land, such as wetlands or native upland habitat. Therefore, development of the site is anticipated to have little or no impact on the environmental quality of the site. For this reason, only minimal adverse environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated. The subject property is in an area designated for medium -density residential development. This allows single- and multiple -family residences on the site. While the current designation of the subject property is compatible with the surrounding existing and planned uses, the analysis indicates that development under the requested designation may result in incompatibilities. Redesignation of the subject property to C/I would negatively impact the county's overall land use pattern in the following ways: • it would facilitate redesignation of other properties within the SR 60 Corridor, • it would implement a strip commercial development pattern; • it would encourage urban sprawl; and • it would discourage infill development and redevelopment. In addition, the requested designation conflicts with the Future Land Use Element Goal; Future Land Use Element Objective 1; Future Land Use Element Policies 14.3, 1.21, and 1.23; and Transportation Element Policy 11.1. For these reasons, staff does not support the request to change the site's current land use designation. Based on the analysis performed, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny the request to redesignate the subject property to CA and deny the request to rezone the site to CG. JULY 119 2000 -115- BlK 114 PG 131 GENERAL Applicant: Santa Maria of Vero Development, Inc. T .o a ion: Southeast comer of 26`h Street and 580' Avenue Acreage: ±17.8 Rxi-ging T.nnd I Tse Desig an tion: M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre) Requested Land Ilse Desi g an tion: CA, Commercial/Industrial Existing .o ing: RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) Requested Zoning: CG, General Commercial District Rxis i g Lind Ilse: Old Citrus Grove ADJACENT LAND North: Vacant, Vero Beach, R -IA, Single -Family Residential District (up to 5 units/acre) South: Ryanwood Shopping Center, CG, General Commercial District East: Single-family subdivision, zoned RS -6 .H -est: Single-family subdivision, church, electrical substation, zoned RS -6 INFRASTRUCTURE Water and sewer available; access from 58`h Avenue; and 260' Street ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS None PUBLIC NOTIFICATION StaffContact: John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 28, 2000 # of Surrounding Prope= Owners Notified: 126 Date Notification Mailed: June 20, 2000 Date Sign Posted: June 20, 2000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Denial PZC RECOMMENDATION Denial (6-0) 'KFfAt ,jQ-d 1 JULY 119 2000 a nw ■ ■ ■iL 110 moo© n �I ■i ■i i■ �� t fY�■ o won man srin:r•17t>c Livia o w url ON i• seaee�eaeeees ieee ee'eee® S.G71 _ 17000+ioYi000fi1 S M . ";�� vo 0 :: W-1 wo �,ua v 7i Y t.--.�-�i ��iNi�i Wi r rag; imp mll rLrlima tY Lve;ri- �il�'A ON Ne 8 l�wW HIM - 11 H ON nx. t: s® NR yw d e e ■103 m= Wm -116- e p w ::C r /F■ 110 moo© n �I ru i YS ■. srin:r•17t>c _ v atON ero ��'" �■ IeBlE edEB�l6s. [ IUMacaa:e�i 'RM -8' 1➢ii1—`- �----JiiAi7�c•� � al v� v va r ON Ne 8 l�wW HIM - 11 H ON �N V Ny MI YIA " Nw .� Egg N.• Nei e ee�0.m-Wm_, : 7 �'w ou 114 PG 132 -I Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed the Comp Plan amendment process, advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on this amendment request. If the Board approves the transmittal of this application to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in Tallahassee for their 60 -day review, a second and final public hearing will be scheduled to consider any comments made by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comp Plan. If the Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA, the application process will come to an end. Director Keating noted that the Planning & Zoning Commission concurred with staff that the request should be denied. The property to the east is Walker's Glen West, to the north is property in the City of Vero Beach, to the south is Ryanwood, and on the west is property zoned M-1, Rivera Estates, a City of Vero Beach electric substation, and a church Commercial redesignation would increase the usage and would be inconsistent with Policy 14.3 and the transportation element in Policy 11.1. He noted there is already a lot of vacant commercial development in that area. Attorney Michael O'Haire, representing the applicant, believed that this application is consistent with the node policy. C/I nodes are subject to increase in size and this one is 80% built -out. The 20 acres west of Home Depot is under contract for development. Staff had requested a limitation to the size of the node recently and the Board had rejected that request. On the west side of the property is 58'' Avenue, a 4 -lane highway. West of the highway is a church and an electric substation. On the north side is 26'b Street. On the south is Ryanwood. This property is bordered on only one side by residential property. 561 Square is the street on the west and then there is a 10 -foot right-of-way, and then his client's JULY 119 2000 -117- OK 114 PG 133 property. He stated there would be 85 feet from the closest home because of a hedge, an existing wall and an additional planned wall. He believed that the Comprehensive Plan has substantially changed because of the development of the Mall and the 44aning of 58'b Avenue. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding this matter. Ron Ewing, 1166 6' Avenue, President of Vista Properties and Walker's Glen West, noted that at the time he bought the Walker's Glen property, the property was zoned for apartments. He believed that 58'h Avenue is a 44ane road but not a highway. The wallbeing described is less than 6 feet tall and the 2 residents at the end of the property are right up against the fence. He does not represent all the property owners but still owns 6 lots in Walker's Glen and is building a new $180,000 home which will be facing this commercial development should it be approved. He felt it is a shame that 15 years ago he could be certain when he purchased land what would be next door, while now there are no such assurances. He urged the Board to vote against the development. Joe D'Ambrosio, 2405 55' Square, wanted to be certain there would be buffer zones and a transitional zone between the housing and the commercial developments. John Collins, 2410 55" Square, commented that the owners of this property were aware when they purchased the property that it was zoned for multi -family development. He felt that if the Board approves this development, they will be ignoring the wishes of a whole group of homeowners. There will be no buffer and no transitional zone between this JULY 119 2000 8k 114 PG 134 development and the residential property. He also felt it would be inconceivable that the Board would go against all the advice of staff. He asked that the Board approve staff recommendation to deny this application. Kenneth Whatmore, 2275 55' Square, also express his opposition to the project and noted that he had been led to believe there would be multi -family development on this land. The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously denied the request to redesignate the subject property to C/I and denied the request to rezone the site to CG, as recommended by staff. 9.A.7. PUBLIC HEARING - GERALD R CLONTZ REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE APPROXIMATELY 30.8 ACRES FROM AG -1 TO M-1 AND TO REZONE THOSE 30.8 ACRES FROM A-1 TO RM -8 AND TO EXPAND THE URBAN SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE THOSE ±30.8 ACRES (Legislative) JULY 119 2000 -119- 614 1 14 PG 13 5 PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 30,,2000: TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator DE TMENT HEAD CONtrURRENCE Robert M. Keatin , AIC, Commu tty Development Director i THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Lo' g -Range Planning FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planningo, DATE: June 30, 2000 RE: Gerald R. Clontz's Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate Approximately 30.8 Acres from AG -1 to M-1; to Rezone Those 30.8 Acres from A-1 to RM -8; and to Expand the Urban Service Area to Include Those *30.8 Acres. PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 20-01-0174 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 11, 2000. DESCRIPTION AND C'ONDMONS This request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate approximately 30.8 acres from AG - 1, Agricultural -1 (up to I unit/5 acres), to M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre); to rezone those 30.8 acres from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RM -8, Multiple - Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre); and to expand the urban service area to include those 30.8 acres. Depicted in Figures 1 and 2, the subject property is located at the southwest comer of the intersection of 58`h Avenue (Kings Highway) and the Main Canal. The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary land use designation to develop the site with residential uses at an urban density. JULY 119 2000 ou114p;136 Figure 1: Location and Land Use Designation of the Subject .Property ZoningFigure 2: Location and of the Subject Property - 0 00 ® L m6m Subject �.��- ' Site: ' t v oa�goo �0 � A-1 JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG 1 3 7 -121- Although the number of plan amendments that a local government may consider is not limited, the frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is regulated by state law. According to Florida Statutes, plan amendments are limited to twice per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts general plan amendment applications only during the `window" months of January and July. In this case, the subject application was one of four applications submitted during the January 2000 window. The procedures for reviewing comprehensive plan amendments involve several steps. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission, as the Local Planning Agency, conducts a public hearing to review the request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of or deny any associated rezoning request. If the rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, unless the denial to rezone is appealed. Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, the Board of County Commissioners conducts two public hearings. The first of those hearings is for a preliminary decision on the land use amendment request. At that hearing, the Board determines whether or not the land use amendment warrants transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for further consideration. A Board of County Commissioners decision not to transmit the land use amendment to DCA constitutes denial of both the land use amendment and rezoning requests. If the land use amendment is transmitted, DCA conducts a review which includes soliciting comments from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, several state agencies, and neighboring local governments. After its review, DCA compiles its objections, if it has any, in an Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report, and transmits that report to the county. After staff addresses any issues that were raised in the ORC Report, the second and final Board of County Commissioners public hearing is conducted. The Board takes final action to approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests at that time. If the Board approves the requests, the effective date of the adoption ordinances is when the land use amendment is found "in compliance" by DCA - Planning and 7.oning Commission Action On May 11, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to take the following actions: 1) Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny this request to redesignate the subject property; and 2) Deny the request to rezone the subject property. The Planning and Zoning Commission denial of the rezoning portion of the request has been appealed. At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to review the subject request and determine whether to transmit it to DCA for review, or to deny the request. F.xistingLand Use Pattern The subject property is zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), and consists of citrus groves and a residence in the northwestern part of the site. West of the subject property, land is zoned A-1 and contains residences on 10 -acre, heavily wooded lots. South of the subject property, land consists of citrus groves and is zoned A-1. East of the subject property, across 58" Avenue, JULY 119 2000 BK 1 14 PG 13 8 land is zoned RS -2, Single -Family Residential District (up to 2 units/acre). That land consists of Kingswood Estates, a subdivision of single-family residences, on the south side of 16t6 Street, and citrus groves on the north side of 16th Street. The Main Canal borders the subject property on the north. The subject property and land to the south and west are designated AG -1, Agricultural -1, on the county's future land use map. The AG -1 designation permits agricultural uses and residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/5 acres. To the north of the subject property, across the Main Canal, land is designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial. The C/I designation permits various commercial and industrial zoning districts. To the east of the subject property, across 58th Avenue, land is designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. Although predominately a citrus grove, the site contains several large protected trees located near the residence. The site, however, does not contain any wetlands or native upland habitat. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of 23 feet NGVD. The site is outside the Urban Service Area (USA) of the county. Potable water distribution lines extend from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant along 586 Avenue (a USA boundary) adjacent to the site. Wastewater collection lines from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant also extend along 58th Avenue adjacent to the site. The property's east boundary abuts 5816 Avenue which is classified as an urban principal arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of 58th Avenue is a four lane paved road with approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of-way. Currently, there are no plans to expand this portion of 58th Avenue. The property's north boundary abuts 300 feet of canal right-of-way. In addition to the Main Canal, that right-of-way includes Atlantic Boulevard. West of 581h Avenue, Atlantic Boulevard is a two lane unpaved local road. Currently, there are no plans to expand this portion of Atlantic Boulevard. In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the land use amendment request will be presented. Specifically, this analysis will address: • the request's impact on public facilities; • the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; • the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; • the request's potential impact on environmental quality; • urban service area expansion issues; and • site development options. This site is located outside of the county Urban Service Area; therefore, the property is not currently suited for urban scale development. Regardless, the Comprehensive Plan establishes minimum JULY 119 2000 -123- 9K 1 14 PG 13 9 development standards for. Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, conditional concun-ency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested land use designation. For residential Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed land use designation. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: +30.8 acres 2. Existing Land Use Designation: AG -1, Agricultural -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres) 3. Proposed Land Use Designation: M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre) 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Current Land Use Designation: 6 Single -Family Units 5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Proposed Land Use Designation: 246 Single -Family Units Transportation As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA reports the number of peak hour/peak seasonipeak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever is less. According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 246 single-family units on the subject property. Attachment 4 of this staff report contains a more detailed transportation concurrency analysis. Water With the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, the subject property could accommodate 246 single-family residential units, resulting in water consumption at a rate of 246 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 61,500 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 4,500,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. JULY 119 2000 -124- • Wastewater Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, development of the property will have a wastewater generation nate of approximately 246 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 61,500 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. County wastewater service is available to the site from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of over 1,000,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request. Solid Waste Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year. With the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a residential development of 246 units would be anticipated to house approximately 566 people (2.3 X 246). For the subject request to meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 1,115 (566 X 1.97) cubic yards/year. A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a four year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the proposed land use designation. Drainage All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. In this case, the minimum floor elevation level -of -service standard applies, since a portion of the property lies within a floodplain. Consistent with Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 1.2, the finished floor elevation of any new buildings constructed within a floodplain must be elevated a minimum of six inches above the base flood level. Since the subject property lies within Flood Zone AE -23, which is a special flood hazard area located within the 100 -year floodplain, any development on the property must have a minimum finished floor elevation of no less than 23.5 feet above mean sea level. Besides the minimum elevation requirement, on-site retention and discharge standards also apply to this request. With the most intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface under the proposed land use designation will be approximately 21.6 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, will be approximately 866,943 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level -of -service, the applicant will be required to retain approximately 643,117 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, the estimated pre -development runoff rate is 74.97 cubic feet/second. Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level -of -service standards will be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, requiring retention of the 643,117 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property, and requiring that all finished floor elevations exceed 23.5 feet above mean sea level. JULY 119 2000 -125- IRA 114 PG 14 • As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process. Recreation A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed land use designation indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained. The following table illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus park acreage. PARK INFORMATION LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) Project Demand (Acres) Surplus Park Acreage 4.0 2.264 1,164 Concurrency Summary Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid waste, water, wastewater, and parks have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation. While all services and facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation and zoning, this positive concurrency test is not an indication that the subject property is currently appropriate for residential development at an urban density. Passing the concurrency test justifies the proposed land use amendment and rezoning only if the proposed land use designation and zoning district are consistent with all other comprehensive plan policies and compatible with surrounding areas. In Indian River County, available capacity for services does not dictate development patterns; rather, the comprehensive plan dictates the location of services. Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), F.S. " Amendments and rezonings must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions --including plan amendment and rezoning decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies: JULY 119 2000 -126- 9 Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with the county's Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria are: • the proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; • the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; • the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites, and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity depicted on the Future Land Use Map; or • the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property. Staffs position is that this land use amendment request does not meet any of the criteria of Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Since June of 1991, the Comprehensive Plan has assigned an agricultural land use designation to the subject property. The AG -1 land use designation was assigned for the following reasons: • The predominant land use in the south part of the county, along the west side of 58' Avenue, was agricultural; • The subject property was within a large flood hazard area, and • Based on population projections, an oversupply of urban designated land, both residential and commercial/industrial, existed in the county. The county's Evaluation and Appraisal Process, implemented during the 1996 to 1998 time period, affirmed the above circumstances. Based on the development characteristics listed above, the property's land use designation assigned in 1991 was correct then, was affirmed in the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and still is correct today. For these reasons, there was no mistake nor oversight in the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the request does not involve a swap of land use designations as required to meet Policy 14.3's third criterion. Policy 14.3's fourth criterion requires a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property to justify a future land use map amendment. In fact, there have been two changes near the site. The first is the redesignation of 15 acres located north of the subject property on the north side of the Main Canal from M-1 to C/I. The other change is the expansion of 58' Avenue from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. The redesignation of the 15 acres does not substantially affect the subject property. The westem.half of the redesignated site is a stormwater retention pond. The eastern half is currently vacant. Any development on that site is subject to the provisions of the SR 60 Corridor Plan. Given the existing uses on both the existing and the subject properties and the 300 feet of physical separation provided by the Main Canal, it is unlikely that the redesignated property will impact the subject property. Nevertheless, given the ±30.8 acre size of the subject property and the ±7.5 acre size of the redesignated property, potential impacts, if any, can be mitigated through buffering and site design. JULY 11, 2000 nu 11 143 Like the redesignation of the nearby 15 acres, the expansion of 58' Avenue does not substantially affect the subject property. Since that expansion is programmed to extend from 26`" Street to 9'h Street, SW (Oslo Road), the subject property is not uniquely affected Unlike most parcels within that corridor, however, the subject property did receive some additional benefit associated with the 58" Avenue widening project. That benefit was that, in conjunction with the 58'" Avenue project, the county moved College Lane several hundred feet north College Lane was previously located near the subject property within the Main Canal right-of-way. For those reasons, the referenced changes do not substantially affect the site. Because the proposed amendment does not meet any of the criteria identified above, the request is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. Future Land Use Element Objective 1 and Policy 4.1; and Housing Element Policy 1.2 This objective and these policies state that Indian River County will have an efficient and compact land use pattern which encourages infill development within the existing urban service area and reduces urban sprawl. Urban sprawl refers to scattered, untimely, poorly planned urban development that occurs in urban fringe and rural areas and frequently invades land important for environmental protection, natural resource protection, and agricultural production. This Comprehensive Plan amendment will allow the inefficient type of development described in the previous paragraph. An M-1 land use designation will permit up to 246 residential units on the subject property. Rather than infill within the existing urban service area, the proposed amendment will establish urban intensity development in an area adjacent to citrus groves and residences on 10 - acre wooded tracts. For these reasons, the request does not promote an efficient and compact land use pattern and therefore, the request is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1 and Policy 4.1; and Housing Element Policy 1.2. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1 requires Indian River County to adopt a Future Land Use Map. This map illustrates the land use designation pattern for the entire county. Approximately 33,292 acres of Indian River County are designated for residential land uses according to the Future Land Use Map. Using the map with its assigned densities along with projections of the county's population allows for the calculation of a Residential Allocation Ratio (RAR). A RAR compares the number of residential units allowed by the Future Land Use Map during a certain time period to the number of residential units needed during that time period. Along with historic land use patters and other factors, an RAR can be a useful tool to determine the county's residential land use needs. Comparing the expected need with the existing acreage of residentially designated land, Indian River County has an RAR of t3.5. A 3.5 RAR indicates that the county currently has three and a half times the amount of residentially designated land needed to accommodate the county's population in 2020. Another way to interpret a 3.5 RAR is in terms of how long the county's supply of residentially designated land is anticipated to last. Given that a 1.0 RAR is anticipated to last 20 years (from 2000 to 2020), a 3.5 RAR indicates that the county has approximately a 70 year supply of residentially designated land. JULY 119 2000 -128- BK114PG144 This is important because it means that, currently, there is a great deal of land within the urban service area that is served by public facilities and services, and is designated for residential uses, yet remains vacant. That is the land where the comprehensive plan intends for growth to occur. Developing a large portion of that land before expanding the urban service area is an example of infill development. Expanding the urban service area, as proposed by the subject amendment, discourages infill development (the development of land currently within the urban service area). Based on existing conditions, as well as existing population growth patterns, designating the subject property M-1 would be premature. Indian River County's RAR indicates that a need does not exist to redesignate the subject property to M-1. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 This policy states that "the Medium -Density Residential Land Use Designations are intended for areas which are suitable for urban scale development and intensities." Because the site is in an area of the county adjacent to both extensive agricultural development and residences on 10 -acre wooded lots, the site is not currently suitable for urban scale development and intensity. For these reasons, the subject property is not suitable for the M-1 land use designation; therefore, the request is not consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13. Summary of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan While the referenced objective and policies are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Compatibility with the Surrounding rea Staffs position is that granting the request to redesignate the subject property to M-1 could result in development that will be incompatible with surrounding areas. The subject property is adjacent to a citrus grove. Active agricultural operations involve noise, odors, and spraying, all of which can adversely impact residential development. If residential development were to occur on the subject property, nearby grove owners may be pressured to reduce or eliminate aerial spraying, limit the hours of ground spraying, relocate pumps, and reduce other impacts. Also, residential development adversely impacts agriculture by increasing incidences of trespassing, vandalism, and Carribean fruit fly host plants. Past experience suggests that incompatibilities are more likely to occur where residential land borders agricultural land. Lands bordering the subject property on the south and west are agriculturally designated. Granting the proposed amendment would increase, in several ways, the chances of incompatibilities occurring. First, the proposed amendment will lengthen the agricultural -residential border by approximately 740 feet. Additionally, under the proposed amendment, the county loses the 230 feet of separation between agriculturally designated land and residentially designated land that is provided by 58i° Avenue and the Lateral `B" Canal. Separation can often work to mitigate potential incompatibilities between land uses. An even more important point, however, also relates to physical separation. The location of the subject property, physically separated by roads and canals from urban designated areas to the north and east, naturally and logically groups the site with the agriculturally designated land abutting the site on the south and west. JULY 119 2000 -129- BK I1 PG 145 In the area of the subject property, the Main Canal and the 58h Avenue/Lateral "B" Canal Corridor form clear, distinct and logical urban service area boundaries. The proposed amendment breaches those boundaries by permitting residential development at the county's second highest density to abut agriculturally designated land containing citrus groves and residences on 10 -acre tracts. For these reasons, residential development of the subject property would be anticipated to increase incompatibilities with surrounding areas. The site has been cleared, and contains no environmentally important land, such as wetlands or native upland habitat. Therefore, development of the site is anticipated to have little or no impact on the environmental quality of the site. For this reason, only minimal adverse environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated. There are three principal issues associated with urban service area expansion. These are: Timing - Is there a need to expand the urban service area at this time? Location - When the urban service area warrants expansion, where should that occur? Development Pattern - When the urban service area warrants expansion, should the expansion area be allowed to develop in a single -use, non -connected, sprawl manner or should it be required to develop in a better planned manner? Urban Service Area Expansion: Timing The above analysis demonstrates that the urban service area does not warrant expansion at this time. Not only is there significant land available for development within the urban service area, the Residential Allocation Ratio indicates that there is no need for expansion. Urban Service Area Expansion: Location When circumstances warrant expansion of the urban service area, the expansion should occur only after an analysis of where that expansion should occur. There are many areas of the county which are adjacent to the current urban service area, adjacent to arterial roads, and adjacent to public utility lines. Those areas may also be near other public facilities such as schools and parks. Approving this request without assessing whether this would be the best area for expansion could result in an inefficient land use pattern In addition, approval of this request would make it difficult to deny similar requests along the urban service area boundary throughout the county. Urban Service Area Expansion: Development Pattern When circumstances warrant expansion of the urban service area, the county will have two choices as to the development pattern in the expansion area. The first alternative would be for the county to designate the expansion area with one of the current land use plan designations. This would produce a development pattern of single -use residential area with unconnected subdivisions, having limited pedestrian opportunities, without a mix of uses, and inefficient to serve with public facilities. The second option would be for the county not to expand the urban service area for conventional development. Instead, the county could choose to expand the urban service area only when the expansion area will be developed in a traditional neighborhood development pattern. JULY 119 2000 -130- BK 114 PG 146 0 Recent legislation in the State of Florida (the Bert Harris Property Rights Act) gives land owners certain rights associated with their property's land use designation. With the passage of the Bert Harris Property Rights Act, land owners may petition for compensation when the development potential of their property is reduced In other words, the proposed amendment, if adopted, cannot be "un -done" in the future without compensating the applicant. In addition to several agricultural, recreational, and institutional site development options, the applicant has the following two residential site development options: 1) The applicant can create a subdivision of 6 five -acre lots. 2) The applicant can create a subdivision of 6 one -acre or smaller lots clustered together on a portion of the site. The remainder of the site can be used for agriculture, open space, or recreational amenities. Ii', in the future, the land use designation of the undeveloped area is changed to allow higher density, the undeveloped area could be developed at the higher density. Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment conflicts with the comprehensive plan; specifically, the request conflicts with Future Land Use Element Objective 1 and Policies 1.1, 1.13, 4.1, and 14.3; and Housing Element Policy 1.2. The analysis also indicates that the proposed amendment increases the likelihood of the occurrence of incompatibilities. Most importantly, the subject property is located in an area that currently is suited for agricultural or other non -urban uses; conversion to urban density residential development is premature, at this time. For these reasons, staff does not support the request to change the subject property's current land use designation and zoning district. Based on the analysis conducted, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny this request to change the land use designation of the subject property, and deny the request to rezone the site. JULY 119 2000 -131- BK 114 PG 147 0 GENERAL Applicant: Gerald R. Clontz Lacation: Southwest comer of the intersection of 58' Avenue and the Main Canal Acreage: 130.8 Fxicting Land I Ice Desig an tion: AG -1, Agricultural -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres) Requested T and Use Desig an tion: M-1, Medium-DensityResidential-1 (up to 8 units/acre) Existing Zoning: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) Requested .oning: RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 unitsiacre) Fxicting Land I Ice: Citrus grove and one residence ADJACENT LAND North: The Main Canal South: Citrus groves; zoned A-1 East: Single-family subdivision and citrus groves; zoned RS -2 West: Residences on 10 -acre, wooded lots; zoned A-1 INFRASTRUCTURE Water and sewer available; access from 58' Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS none PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Staff Contact: John Wachtel Date Advertised: June 28, 2000 # of C irro coding Prop= Owners Notified: 64 Date Notification Mailed: June 21, 2000 Da Sign Posted: June 20, 2000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Denial PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Denial (6-0) JULY 119 2000 0 ora Subject . -sit. l0o�, Not wm quill ad0ee=I -132- —�pio� jra eve j~ o odo °L'i A�rge� S ubject�Ie�w ia��®HE m !�a v oa¢�in ° ji �]�® m _I Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed the Comp Plan amendment process, advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on this amendment request. If the Board approves the transmittal of this application to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in Tallahassee for their 60 -day review, a second and final public hearing will be scheduled to consider any comments made by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comp Plan. If the Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA, the application process will come to an end. Director Keating noted there is a significant buffer in the main relief canal which is 300 feet wide. Attorney Michael O'Haire, representing the applicant, stated that Gerald Clontz has lived on this property all his life. His father planted the grove that is there now. However, due to surrounding development, the property can no longer be used for agricultural purposes. The Department of Environmental Protection will not allow overspraying. Ruby Tuesday's is immediately to the north of his property on a 4 -lane highway with a built -out node across the highway. Mr. Clontz cannot farm or live on his property any longer. This is now prime development property and Mr. Clontz is entitled to some relief. Chairman Adams felt this is an unusual situation and exemplifies the problem of interfacing agricultural uses with commercial development. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding this matter. JULY 119 2000 -133- BK 114 PG 14 9 Richard Carnell, 1550 56' Court, commented on behalf of the Kingswood Estates Property Owner Association, and felt that if the Board opens this property to development of 240 residential units, they would be creating a terrible traffic situation. The traffic in that area is already too heavy. He asked the Board to deny the application. Bob Swift, 6450 Glendale Road, real estate developer, felt there are substantive boundaries in this area and urged the Board to deny the application. He felt Mr. Clontz' economic situation is not driven by the surrounding development but by the marketplace. Attorney O'Haire suggested the Board direct staff to realign the node to delete the wastewater treatment plant, leaving 220 acres which could then be rezoned and redesignated to RM -3. The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. JULY 119 2000 MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, that the Board approve the recommendation of staff to deny the request and direct staff to come up with a constructive plan to alleviate this situation. -134- BK 114 PG 150 _I Chairman Adams felt it is the Board's responsibility to alleviate the situation. Major changes have already been made on 58' Avenue and the Board needs to ameliorate the impact on citizens where possible. She believed this is an opportunity to provide a transitional area and come up with some positive solutions. ON MOTION amended by Commissioner Macht, and SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously denied the request to change the land use designation of the subject property and denied the request to rezone the site, as recommended by staff, and directed staff to develop a plan dealing specifically with this property and generically with this situation. 9.A.8. PUBLIC HEARING - BEUTTELL DEVELOPMENT AND KIRK KOEHLER, TRUSTEE REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REDESIGNATE ±195.7 ACRES FROM AG -1 TO L-1 AND TO EXPAND THE URBAN SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE THOSE ±195.7 ACRES (Legislative) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD JULY 119 2000 -135- BK 114 PG 15 1 (CLERK'S NOTE: THIS ITEM WAS ORIGINALLY DELETED; HOWEVER, ATTORNEY MICHAEL O'HAIRE ASKED TO BE RECOGNIZED.) Attorney Michael O'Haire noted that this item has been withdrawn. However, he indicated on the Land Use Map that the property taken up by the wastewater treatment plant in yellow on the map should be purple and has no reason to exist as a part of the Urban Service Area. This application has a great deal in common with the Clontz application in that the property is no longer useful for agricultural purposes. He would like to meet with staff to contemplate what needs to be changed prior to any transmittal to the DCA. 9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY - REQUEST TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSALS FOR THE NORTH COUNTY RECREATION COMPLEX (CLERK'S NOTE: THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED FROM THE MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2000 AND WAS HEARD AFTER ITEM 11.G.1. BUT IS PRESENTED HERE FOR PURPOSES OF CONTINUITY.) Frank Coffey noted that on June 19, 2000 he submitted a letter with 21 issues and questions. On July 3' he had an opportunity to meet with Mr. Davis and he provided some answers but some issues still need the Commission's attention. He was disappointed that no workshop was held on this matter and questioned whether the School Board will contribute to the project. Jim Granse, 36 Pine Arbor Lane, concerned citizen, believed that this is a similar situation to the purchase of the McKee Jungle Gardens which was put to a referendum vote. He believed the School Board should invest heavily in this project as it will be too far away for the majority of residents to readily use. He also felt there should be an adjustment to the name of the park. JULY 119 2000 -136- QKI{4PG15 I Bryan Eaton, 502 Citrus Avenue, stated he works with the Red Cross, the Women's Club, and coaches the Sebastian River High School Swim Team. There have been several public meetings regarding this project. In fact, the first public meeting was attended by himself and Commissioner Fran Adams. The second public meeting had a few more attendees but not many. He was unsure how the School Board would feel about participating in this venture when their year is only a 3 -month one. He believed that a larger, deeper pool is a necessity as children need to learn to swim in water that is over their heads and the moveable bulkheads allow for multiple uses of the pool. The Leisure Square pool is overcrowded and the last time he used it, he had 18 to 20 swimmers and only 2 lanes available to them. This larger pool would eliminate a lot of those problems. Steve Fenning, 2079 5' Court SE, was concerned about downsizing the pool and noted that senior swimmers from St. Edward's who want to compete at a high level have to go to the 50 -meter pool at Indian River Community College. These pools do not pay for their costs but the revenues do offset the expenses. The pool at St. Edward's is used by Sebastian River High School and for adult fitness in the evenings. Also, that pool is not deep enough for diving. A large pool would be used everyday and both Martin and St. Lucie Counties have 50 -meter pools. Carl Pease, 1436 32nd Avenue, wanted it noted that the City of Vero Beach paid for the Leisure Square pool and he felt the School Board should put some money into this project. Stan Chichewicz believed this is the opportunity of a lifetime and all of the components should be built. JULY 119 2000 -137- BK ! 1 4 PG 153 Chairman Adams noted that this plan was first introduced by Mr. Chichewicz in 1993 or 1994. Tom Buchanan, a concerned citizen, felt this is a beautiful project but believed it should be in a more centrally located area. Jim Carter, 429 Seagrass Avenue, coached swimming in Ft. Pierce and helped coach at Sebastian River High School. His daughter is now a lifeguard with the County. He believed there is definitely a need for this project. The north end of the county is rapidly growing and the children from that area are being bused to St. Edward's to take advantage of their pool. He felt the project should go forward. Michael Brink, 598 Ray Street, stated that his daughter learned to swim in a deep pool at the YMCA and is now training at St. Edward's where the pool is very crowded. This project is needed. Lynn Brink, 598 Ray Street, stated that the population in Sebastian is very close to the population in Vero Beach. Residents in Sebastian often feel left out. She drives her daughter to St. Edward's and that is a 45 -minute trip. There are now 1200 kids in elementary school alone in Sebastian. She hoped the pool will be available so her daughter can take advantage of scholarship offerings. Curtis Caywood, 211 Faith Terrace, noted that the pool will also be used by residents of Wabasso and Fellsmere. He has 2 children who have to be driven to St. Edward's by his wife and we really need a pool in our area. JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG 154 Chuck Neuberger felt some of the extras could be delayed for a time and believed that a workshop is needed. Louise Cartwright, 785 Bay Harbor Terrace, commented that this is a unique plan for all the residents of the County, not just the children. Older people use the pools daily and the larger size can accommodate a diversity of uses. As to a workshop, this has been an ongoing project since 1980 and has been workshopped. It also is a convenient location from anywhere in the County. She reminded the Board that she had promised her child that this pool would be built before she graduated from high school and she is now in the 81 grade. If this project gets postponed again, she invited the Board to have that discussion with her daughter. Chairman Adams noted for those citizens who had just recently become involved that there have been several public meetings recently. On May 29' and on June ld of this year there were public meetings. Prior to that there were 2 public meetings which were held in North County and one at the library before that. There were 2 other public meetings in March of this year. The School Board has discussed the plan and they are committed to it and will participate financially. NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. 9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 18, 2000 JULY 119 2000 -139- BK 114 PG 155 1. LDR AMENDMENTS: A. TRAFFICIMPACT FEES FOR GOLF COURSE PROJECTS: B. SR -60 CORRIDOR WINDOWSIGNS: C WABASSO CORRIDOR; ADDITIONAL MUIREMENTS IN THE CR -SIO EAST CORRIDOR SUB AREA D. SR -60 CORRIDOR FREESTANDING SIGNS NEAR I- 95' E. BUILDINGHEIGHTREGULATIONS 2. JOSEPHAND BEVERLYDRIVER - REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OFA PORTION OF 128TH COURT. ROSELAND (LEGISLATIVEL The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 5, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DI SIO HEAD CONCURRENCE: 1 0/1. Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Director 1410 FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: July 5, 2000 SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearings for the July 18, 2000 Board Meeting aut.Y ii, 2000 BK 114 PG 15 6 -140- 11.G.1. NORTH COUNTY PARK - BRAD SMITH & ASSOCIATES - WELLER POOLS CLERK'S NOTE: DEFERRED FROM MEETING OF JUNE 13:12000. The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 7, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: North County Park 1) Approval of Master Plan — 2) Approval of Revenue Option and Construction Alternative Phase I — Pool Complex and Site Infrastructure 3) Design/Build Contract with Weller Pools and Selection of a Construction Manager for Site Work DATE: June 7, 2000 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Brad Smith and Associates, Inc. has completed the Master Plan phase for the North County Park located at the SE comer of the St. Sebastian River Buffer Preserve north of CR512, just west of the Sebastian Middle School property. Extensive meetings have been held with Keith Fischer, DEP Preserve Manager, and St. Johns River Water Management District staff to design site improvements on the 120 acre site in an environmentally compatible mariner. Brad Smith will explain the Master Plan Design using a PowerPoint format. Community and agency input workshops were held Feb. 9, 2000 and May 23, 2000, as well as the June 1, 2000 meeting of the Parks and Recreation Committee. At this time, staff is seeking approval of the Master Plan design, Phase I scope and budget, and delivery system to proceed with construction of Phase 1 so facilities can be open in May 2001. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Master Plan Approval The Parks and Recreation Committee approved the Master Plan on June 1, 2000 and recommends Board approval. Revenue Options Currently, the revenues to fund Phase I may include the following: JULY 11, 2000 BIA 1 14 PG 158 a -142- 9 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 11, 2000. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Please be advised that the following public hearings have been scheduled for Board consideration at its July 18, 2000 meeting. 1. LDR (Land Development Regulations) Amendments: A. TIFs (traffic impact fees) for Golf Course Projects B. SR 60 Corridor Window Signs C. Wabasso Corridor: Additional Requirements in the CR 510 East Corridor Sub -area D. SR 60 Corridor Freestanding Signs Near I-95 E. Building Height Regulations 2. Joseph & Beverly Driver's request for an abandonment of a portion of 128' Court in Roseland (Legislative). RECOMMENDATION: The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board's information. No action is needed. Community Development Director Bob Keating announced that Item 9.C.2., the Driver request for an abandonment of a portion of 128`' Court in Roseland will not be heard on July 18, 2000 but will be re -advertised to be heard on August 1, 2000. NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. JULY 119 2000 -141- Bm"114PG157 • Revenue Option No. I Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) for North County Park FY 99/00 $ 2,450,000 FY 00/01 $ 1,000,000 FRDAP Grant $ 150,000 CR512 widening — Retention Pond Funding $ 100.000 $ 3,700,000 Revenue Option No. 2 Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) for North County Park FY 99/00 $ 2,450,000 FY 00/01 $ 1,000,000 FRDAP Grant $ 150,000 CR512 widening — Retention Pond Funding $ 100,000 Park Development Fund $ 125,000 Tree Fine Fund $ 50.000 $ 3,875,000 There is $1,000,000 in LOST Revenue set aside for multi-purpose recreation field land acquisition in FY 99/2000 and FY 02/03. Since the State Legislature has approved $4.3 million for stormwater lake land acquisition in Indian River County, it is possible that the County could purchase land adjacent to stormwater lakes for parks, and the stormwater lakes could treat the runoff from the park improvements. This could reduce the land area needed for recreation fields, and a portion of the $1 million, perhaps $500,000, could possibly be diverted to North County Park. The following revenue option #3, therefore, is presented: Revenue Option No. 3 Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) for North County Park FY 99/00 $ 2,450,000 FY 00/01 $ 1,000,000 FRDAP Grant $ 150,000 CR512 widening — Retention Pond Funding $ 100,000 Park Development Fund $ 125,000 Tree Fine Fund $ 50,000 LOST Multipurpose field allocation $ 500.000 $ 4,375,000 Phase I Construction Alternatives For Phase I construction, the following alteratives are presented: Construction Alternative No. I Due to the complicated piping and subsurface excavation associated with pool construction, it would be preferable to construct at least the Olympic pool and activity pool concurrently. The cost to accomplish this is: Construction Costs Olympic pool(w/separate diving area and movable bulkheads) Activity pool (7,(YQ0 s.f.) Pool Deck Fencing Pool Building Parking Lighting Landscapmg/irrigation Site Amenities/Fumishings Roads, Drainage, Utilities Construction Contingency Subtotal -Construction Costs JULY 119 2000 -143- $ 1,750.000 $ 750.000 $ 160.000 $ 35.000 $ 823.408 $ 238,050 $ 125,000 $ 120,000 $ 115,000 $ 477,398 $ 145.177 $ 4,739,033 INK 1 14 PG 15 9 0 Non -Construction Costs Impact Fees Water/Sewer Connection Permit & Related Fees Professional & Design Fees Mitigation Geotechnical Contingency Subtotal — Non Construction Costs GRAND TOTAL — Alt #1 Revenue Option #3 Overage/(Shonfall) $ 100,711 $ 3,250 $ 17,335 $ 249,070 $ 7,500 $ 3,500 $ 50.000 431 66 $ 5,170,369 $ 4.375.000 ($ 795,369) Construction Alternative No. 2 Reduce the size of the activity pool to 5,000 s.f instead of 7,000 sI, and/or eliminate movable bulkheads and separate diving well in the Olympic pool. This would result in a less functional facility, since 50 meter swimming and diving could not be performed simultaneously, but both pools could be constructed to accommodate 25 yard and 50 meter swimming, diving, and activity pool. The cost for Alternative No. 2 could be reduced to the Maximum Revenue scenario of $4,375,000. Construction Alternative No. 3 Eliminate the Activity Pool and only construct the Olympic Pool. Construction Cost $ 3,824,352 Non -Construction Cost S 431.366 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,255,718 Revenue Option #3 $ 4.375.000 Overage/(Shortfall) $ 120,718 Construction Alternative No. 4 Eliminate the Olympic Pool and construct only the Activity Pool (7,000 s.f) Construction Cost $ 3,033,502 Non -Construction Cost $ 431.366 GRANT TOTAL - $ 3,464,868 Revenue Option #2 $ 3,875,000 Overage/(Shon fall) S 410,132 Any overage can fund ball field, playground, and other improvements. DesignBuild Contract with Weller Pools and Construction Manager Services To expedite pool and related facilities construction for Phase I, the Public Works Department staff has considered the three conventional delivery systems for design/construction of the project. The standard consultant design/advertise for bid/contract award to a General Contractor method is time consuming and provides very little pre -construction input from the builder. On the other hand, the second method, design/build, eliminates the competitive bid process and staff cannot compare the guaranteed maximum price to other contractor prices. The third method, construction manager at risk, allows a construction manager to work with the design team to design and supervise construction of the project while working as an extension of the County staff to bring the project cost below a guaranteed maximum price. The Construction Manager will retain subcontractors approved by the County to actually construct the pool building and site infrastructure, with the exception of the pools. JULY 119 2000 aid 114 PG 160 is -144- • • In the case of the Phase I construction, it would be expeditious to contract with Weller Pools Construction to design/build the swimming pool(s). Since Weller Pools has constructed many municipal pools which were competitively bid, the County could piggy -back the bid of similar projects for Florida governmental agencies. In this manner, the County would utilize an experienced contractor at a competitive price. To assist design and provide construction of the pool building and park infrastructure, staff recommends hiring a Construction Manager At Risk to provide design advice and act as General Contractor. A guaranteed maximum price would be approved to stay within budget. The two -three months associated with bidding and contract award would be eliminated. A more detailed description of the Construction Manager duties is attached. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends the following: 1. Approve the Master Plan for North County Park 2. Approve Revenue Option 3 ($4,375,000) and Phase I Construction Alternative No. 2 (budget is $4,375,000) to construct both pools and necessary site infrastructure. 3. Conceptually approve the Design/Build vehicle with Weller Pools to design and_constructbotlr- pools by piggy -backing another governmental agency's contact. " A specific contract will be presented to the Board at a later date. Also, conceptually approve retaining the services of a Construction Manager at Risk to supervise and construct the pool building and Phase I site infrastructure. Brad Smith, President of Brad Smith Associates, commented that this has been a fun process with a lot of great input from folks. He gave a brief PowerPoint presentation of the project. (COPY OF PRESENTATION IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY'S MEETING.) Bill West, Weller Pools, commented that if the pool is downsized, major swimming meets would be eliminated. Buildings are much easier to expand than pools. Commissioner Ginn noted that she had been a competitive swimmer and had used a 25 -meter pool. She did not believe a 50 -meter pool was needed. Chairman Adams reminded the Board that the pool would also provide a place to exercise and swim laps. She believed that we are obligated to provide an opportunity to allow the 2 high schools to become competitive on a state-wide basis. She felt the 50 -meter pool is very necessary, especially in light of the fact that Tampa may be chosen as an Olympic site in which case they would be looking for training sites for months at a time. She also felt the "lazy river" would pay for itself within a couple of years. JULY 11, 2000 -145- 8K 114 PG 161 Commissioner Macht agreed that designating the project "North County" is not appropriate since we are such a small county. Director Davis then explained the bid process and how the county benefitted from another government entity's bid to deal with Weller. Greg Smith, Assistant Superintendent for Operations at the School District, extolled the benefits of a construction manager. The School Board has used a construction manager very successfully for 3 years and plans to use one in the future. The advantages include having the owner involved in who the subcontractors will be, the up -front costs, and monthly reports. JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the Master Plan for North County Park; Revenue Option 3 ($4,375,000) and Phase I Construction Alternative No. 2 (budget is $4,375,000) to construct both pools and necessary site infrastructure. MASTER PLAN WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED -146- ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously conceptually approved the Design/Build vehicle with Weller Pools to design and construct both pools by piggy -backing another governmental agency's contract, a specific contract will be presented to the Board at a later date; also conceptually approved retaining the services of a Construction Manager at Risk to supervise and construct the pool building and Phase I site infrastructure; all as recommended by staff. The Chairman called a break and Commissioner Macht left the meeting due to illness. 11.G.2. 16' STREET BETWEEN 661H AND 74TH AVENUES - RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - DONALD E. SMITH, TRUSTEE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 2112000: JULY 11, 2000 -147- BK 114 PG ! 6 3 JULY 11, 2000 TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director AND Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engin FROM: Ronald L. Callahan, SRA, Right -of -Way SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition 16" Street between 66" and 74" Avenues Street Paving and Drainage Improvements/Project No. 9920 Donald E. Smith, Trustee DATE: June 21, 2000 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS An additional 70 feet (70') of right-of-way is needed along the north side of 16" Street between 66' and 74" Avenues to accommodate a mad improvement (paving and drainage) project. The owner has executed a contract at a negotiated price of $25,000 per acre for this A -I zoned land, which has a Land Use designation of M-1, 8 -units per acre. This price per acre is comparable to other similar M-1 designated land use parcels the County has purchased based upon appraisals or evaluations. The contract price is $13,225.00 based upon a total of 0.529 acres. There are no appraisal or attorneys fees. Other terms and conditions in the contract are as follows: a) The $13,225.00 will be net to the seller. There will be no expenses taken from the contract price, b) There will be no assessments levied against the property for the completion of this project. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the $13,225.00 purchase and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. Funding will be from Account # 315-214-541-066.12. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously approved the $13,225 purchase and authorized the Chairman to execute the contract, as recommended by staff. CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD -148- BK 114 PG 164 • ILGA RESOLUTION 2000-073 PROVIDING FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 101H STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW AND 10TH STREET SW BETWEEN 201H AVENUE SW AND 18TH AVENUE SW, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION AND RESOLUTION 2000-074 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 28, 2000: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works I AND Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CET, Civil EngineerA SUBJECT: Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to and set Public Hearing date for. 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW AND 10TH STREET SW BETWEEN 20TH AVENUE SW & 187H AVENUE SW DATE: June 28, 2000 The County Public Works Department has received a petition for a public improvement assessment for road paving and drainage improvements for the following: 19T$ AVENUE SW BETWEEN IOT$ STREET SW & 9TB STREET SW AND 1OTB STREET SW BETWEEN 20TH AVENUE SW & 18"B AVENUE SW The petition was signed by 15 of 22 property owners on 190'Avenue SW between 10" Street SW and Oslo Road. This represents 68% of the parcels within these limits who are in favor of having this road paved. Two developers who own property adjacent to 10`h Street SW between 20`h Avenue SW and 18`h Avenue SW are required to pave a portion of 10`h Street SW within the area of their proposed development. This would leave a break in the continuity of pavement on I O'h Street SW, therefore the Engineering Division is recommending paving all of 10'x' Street SW between 20'h Avenue SW and 18" Avenue SW and assessing all the property owners whose property abuts these proposed improvements. JULY 119 2000 -149- 114 PG 165 • A providing resolution is presented for adoption by the Board. A separate resolution will need to be adopted to hold a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner. This Public Hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, August 15, 2000 at 9:05 A.M. in the County Commission Chambers. An assessment roll and plat has been prepared and filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. It is recommended that the Board: 1) Adopt the resolution providing for the paving and drainage improvements for the projects subject to the terms outlined in the resolution. The applicable interest rate shall be established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time the final assessment roll is approved. 2) Allocate $81,660.01 from the Petition Paving Account #111-214-541-035.39. 3) Adopt a resolution setting the time and place of the Public Hearing. JULY 11, 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously allocated $81,660.01 from the Petition Paving Account and adopted Resolution 2000-073 providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to portions of 19' Avenue SW between 10' Street SW and 9`h Street SW and 10* Street SW between 20* Avenue SW and 18' Avenue SW in Oslo Park Subdivision. @K 1 1 4 PG 166 • Providing (First Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 0 7 3j__ 3/25/97(ENG)RES 1.MAG1ktp A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO PORTIONS OF 19'x' AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10"' STREET SW & 9r" STREET SW AND 10TH STREET SW BETWEEN 2e AVENUE SW & 18TH AVENUE SW IN OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION, PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED. WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department has been petitioned for Road Paving and Drainage Improvement for Portions of 19th Avenue SW between 10'b Street SW & 911 Street SW and 10th Street SW between 20th Avenue SW & 18th Avenue SW in Oslo Park Subdivision. WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Chapter 206, Section 206.01 through 206.09, Indian River County Code; and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls have been completed by the Public Works Department; and the total estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is EIGHTY ONE THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS and ONE CENTS ($81,660.01); and WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall, for any given record owner of property within the area specially benefitted, be in an amount equal to that proportion of seventy-five percent (75%) of the total cost of the project ($62,469.91) which the number of acres owned by the given owner bears to the total number of acres within the areas specially benefitted and twenty-five percent (25%) of the total cost of the project ($20,415.00) will JULY 11, 2000 -151- BK 1 1 4 PG 167 11 No. 2000-.0 7 3 come from Petition Paving Account. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefitted thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments; and WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and payable at the Indian River County Department of Utility Services ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special assessment pursuant to Section 206.08, Indian River County Code; and WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12) months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly, and WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the following described properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these improvement, to wit: Lot 1, Block C, Oslo Park Subdivision, Unit 2; Lots 2 through 11, Block D and Lot IA, Block D, Oslo Park Subdivision, Unit 2; Lots 2 through 11, Block E and Lot 1A, Block E, Oslo Park Subdivision, Unit 2; East %z of Lot 1, Block F, Oslo Park Subdivision, Unit 2; W %z of Lot 1, Block F, Oslo Park Subdivision, Unit 2; as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 13. AND The South 50' of the North 622.5' of that part of the West %x of Tract 2, Section 26, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, lying East of Oslo Park, Unit 2 and West of the West right-of-way of 18`h Avenue, according to a Maintenance Map filed in Plat Book10, Page 75 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida Containing 6.093.8 sq.ft., or 0.14 acres, Lying in Indian river County, Florida AND The South 50' of the North 742.5' of that part of the West %Z of Tract 2, Section 26, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, lying East of Oslo park, Unit 2 and West of the West right-of-way of 18`h Avenue, according to a Maintenance Map filed in Plat Book 10, Page 75 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida Containing 6,062.4 sq.ft., or 0.14 acres. Lying in Indian River County, Florida JULY 119 2000 EK 114 PG 168 No. 2000- 0 7 3 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY CONMUSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety. 2 Aproject providing forpaving and drainage improvements to 19'h Avenue SW between 1& Street SW & So Street SW and I& Street SW between 2& Avenue SW & Ie Avenue SW; heretofore designated as Public Works Project No. 9911 is hereby approved subject to the terms outlined above and all applicable requirements of Chapter 206, et seq. Indian River County Code. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Gi nn who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Absent Commissioner John B. Tippin Aye Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge- Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this 11 th day Of July ,2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: ''-.•� �--� JEI' C BART ,Clerk JULY 119 2000 Fran B. Adams, Chairman -153- 3 Indian River County Approved Date Arirn"n-str tion Risk Management Department Division 3 4. f 8In' 114PG169 JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-074 setting a time and place at which the owners of property on 19' Avenue SW between 10* Street SW and 9 h Street SW and 10t` Street SW between Wh Avenue SW and 18`' Avenue SW in Oslo Park Subdivision and other interested persons may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements to said property as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property benefitted thereby. RK 114 PG 170 -154 0 - Time and Place (Second Resolution) 3/25/97(ENG)RES2.MAG\ktp RESOLUTION NO. 2000- _ 074 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW AND 10TH STREET SW BETWEEN 20TH AVENUE SW & 18TH AVENUE SW IN OSLO PARK SUBDMSION AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PROPERTY AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITTED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 075 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described herein, that paving and drainage improvements be made to said property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements to said property, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefitted thereby, JULY 119 2000 -155- � E!! PG171 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A 74 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMNUSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: The County Commission shall mat at the County Commission chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 A.M. on eqdAy,Auglist 15, 2000, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard to said property. The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefitted are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefitted may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8:30 A.M. until 5:00 P.M. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by the Department of Public Works by two publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Public Works shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. JULY 119 2000 -156- 1 14 PG 17 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 0 74. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Absent Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 th day of Ju 1 y 2000. Attest: Je anon, Cler A hment: ASSESSME ROLL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 aui.Y ii, 2000 gR 114 PG 173 -157- PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR: 19TH AVENUE SW, FROM 9TH STREET SW TO 10TH STREET SW AND 10TH STREET SW, FROM 20TH AVENUE SW TO 18TH AVENUE SV PROJECT # 9911 75% TO BE PAID BY PROPERTY OWNERS $61,245.01 25% TO BE PAID BY COUNTY $20,415.00 2% COLLECTIONS FEE (75% FIGURE) $1,224.90 TOTAL ASSESS $62,469.91 COST PER ACRE $14,733.47 9911ACST.WK4 JULY 119 2000 0612lrMW nu 1 1 -158 0 - TOTAL L.F. 1,283.50 TOTAL ACRES 4.24 1. ENGINEERING $3,048.00 2. CONSTRUCTION $75,401.55 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING $78,449.55 3. PERNUT FEES $350.00 4. TESTING $300.00 5. ROW ACQUISITION & N/A TITLE SEARCH SUB -TOTAL $79.099.55 6. 2.99997 % $2,372.96 ADMINISTRATION 7. RECORDING FEE $187.50 TOTAL COST OF PROJECT $81,660.01 75% TO BE PAID BY PROPERTY OWNERS $61,245.01 25% TO BE PAID BY COUNTY $20,415.00 2% COLLECTIONS FEE (75% FIGURE) $1,224.90 TOTAL ASSESS $62,469.91 COST PER ACRE $14,733.47 9911ACST.WK4 JULY 119 2000 0612lrMW nu 1 1 -158 0 - 1L' lJr W tri. r awe. G'7 cn PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW TOTAL ACREAGE.......... 4.24 PROJECT NO. 9911 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS.......... $62.469.91 COST PER ACRE .............. $14,733.47 9911APRE.WK4 COST/ACRE TOTAL COST $14,733.47 $2,062.69 $14,733.47 $2,357.36 $14,733.47 $4,714.71 $14,733.47 $4,714.71 $14,733.47 $4,714.71 O612R 1X111 • 0 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 7. Tri Partners, LLC _ 26-33-39-00002-0004-10011.0 0.16 979 Beachland Boulevard Lot 11, Bl. D, Oslo Park, Unit #2 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 PB14-13 g. James & Willa Cool 26 -33 -39 -00002 -(0X15 -11()(0L0 0.14 Heritage Village 1001 Peace Street Lot IA, BI. E, Oslo Park, Unit #2 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 PB14-13 9. Daniel & Joanne Decosa 26-33-39-000024005-(101X)2.11 0,16 P.O. Box 650397 Lot 2, Bl. E, Oslo Park, Unit #2 Vero Beach, Florida 32965 PBI 4-13 10. Tri Partners, LLC 26-33-39-00002-0(05-10003.(1 0,32 979 Beachland Boulevard Lot 3, BI. E. Oslo Park, Unit #2 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 PBI 4-13 11. Tri Partners, LLC 26 -33 -394)(X02 -0005-01X05.0 0.32 979 Beachland Boulevard Lots 5 & 6, Bl. E, Oslo Park, Unit #2 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 PBI 4-13 12. James Whalen 26-33-39-(X)(X12-0005-00007.0 0.32 966 19th Avenue SW Lots 7 & 9, BI. E. Oslo Park, Unit #2 Vero Beach, Florida 32962 PB14-13 COST/ACRE TOTAL COST $14,733.47 $2,062.69 $14,733.47 $2,357.36 $14,733.47 $4,714.71 $14,733.47 $4,714.71 $14,733.47 $4,714.71 O612R 1X111 • 0 • Fes+ N PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 TO: 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW TOTAL ACREAGE.......... 4.24 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS.......... $62,469.91 PROJECT NO, 9911 COST PER ACRE .............. $14,733.47 0 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACREAGE_ _ COST/ACRE TOTAL COST 13. Florence M. Sabonjohn 26-33-39-00002-0005-00009.0 0.16 $14,733.47 $2,357.36 1325 5th Avenue SW Lots 9, B1. E, Oslo Park, Unit #2 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 PBI 4-13 14. Helen F. Kaylor 26-33-39-00002-0005-00010.0 0.16 $14,733.47 $2,357.36 C/O Claire Kaylor Cresswell Lots 10, BI. E, Oslo Park, Unit 02 16519 Dobbs Road PBI 4-13 Sparks, Maryland 21152 O� p 15. James Dunbar 26-33-39-00002-0005-00011.0 0.16 $14,733.47 $2,357.36 C/O Anna L. McComas Lots 11, Bl. E, Oslo Park, Unit #2 315 Kentucky Avenue PBI 4-13 St. Albans, West Virginia 25177 16. Janet Lee 26-33-39-00002-0006-00001.0 0.16 $14,733.47 $2,357.36 COX 1875 10th Street SW Lots El/2 of Lot 1, BI. F, Oslo Park, Unit #2 PBI 4-13 Vero Beach, Florida 32962 �+ 17. Jonathan Panks 26-33-39-00002-0006-00001.1 0.16 $14,733.47 $2,357.36 352 Wickline Boulevard Lots W1/2 of Lot I & W 1/2 of Lot 2, BI. F, Oslo .� Lantana, Florida 33462 Park, Unit #2 PBI 4-13 9911APRE.WK4 067R/7nnn 0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO: 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW TOTAL ACREAGE.......... 4.24 COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS.......... $62,469.91 PROJECT NO, 9911 COST PER ACRE .............. $14,733.47 9911APRE.WK4 NAME & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACREAGE COST/ACRF TOTAL COST _ 18. Ronald J. MacMillan (Tr.) 26-33-39-00001-0020-00004.3 0.14 $14,733.47 $2,062.69 P.O. Box 4192 The South 50' of the North 622.5' of that part of Vero Beach, Florida 32964-4192 the West 1/2 of Tract 2, Section 26, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, lying East of Oslo Park, Unit 2 and West of the West right-of-way of 18th Avenue, according to a Maintenance Map filed in Plat Book 10, Page 75 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Containing 6,093.8 sq.fl., or 0.14 acres. Lying in Indian River County, Florida. 19. Ronald J. MacMillan (Tr.) P.O. Box 4192 Vero Beach, Florida 32964-4192 26-33-39-00001-0020-00004.1 The South MY of the North 742.5' of that part of the West 1/2 of Tract 2, Section 26, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, lying East of Oslo Park, Unit 2 and West of the West right-of-way of 181h Avcnue, according to a Maintenance Map filed in Plat Book 10, Page 75 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Containing 6,062.4 sq.ft., or 0.14 acres. Lying in Indian River County, Florida. 0.14 $14,733.47 $2,062.69 4.24 L1111111 FAONT'F'F.£1 $14,733.47 $62,469.911 YY411 ftft FF 7Y1T./F..LISF.SS►l/'A'I MOR/I= • 9 • 0 0 0 I ASSESSMENT PLA T FOR 19th A VENUE SW 0 25 so too AND 10th STREET SW '�, ----------- OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION- UNIT 2 20th AVENUE S. W. a 30• 40• 50' S_0 50 50 50 50 T-50 �50 50 50 � 50 87.50 BLOCBLocx, CLO K -fel , 16 AC. 16 AC. .16 AC 16 AC. .16 AC. .16 AC.I. 1 PAC.1.16 AC.. 16 AC 16 AC -1 AC. o .14 AC. I LOT 1 LOT l l LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8 LOT 7 j LOT 66 LOT 5 LOT. 4 LOT 3 1 LOT 2 �' 87.50' I I 19th HAVEN E/S W��•^ PAVED I I - - 50 50' S0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 l- 50 50 87.50' OG+ .161 AC. ;� 70� .16 AC..16 AC. .16 AC. .16 AC.I.16 AC. .16 AC.1.16 AC. .16 Ad. 16 AC. .16 AC. , -c .14 AC. F. PANKS 50 , 50 tn L�f 3�lotO�K 1 ' 16 IAC. -_- LOT •2 LOT- I LOT 11 LOT f0 LOT 9 LOT B J LOT 7 LOT 6 J LOT 5_ LOT 4 -LOT 3 LOT 2. 87.50'._-J I 50 � 450 rz i w/ %�•- LOT 3 N� /N MAC MILLAN TRACT 1 �I .14 AC. 14 AC. 590 18th AVENUE S.W. o I E.\preps-daps\99\991TV9th avenue ss.dsp 06/28/00 *%M50 MI ECT • 0 ILGA ARBOR TRACE SUBDIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 3, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator July 3, 2000 FROM: James W. DavisP.E. Public Works Directo, SUBJECT: Arbor Trace Subdivision Right -of -Way Acquisition REF. LETTER: Steve Melchiori to Jim Davis dated June 24, 2000 The developer of Arbor Trace Subdivision has dedicated SO' of additional right-of-way along Oslo Road and 50' along 43ltl Avenue to meet Thoroughfare Plan right-of-way requirements. Ten feet along both roads is donated without compensation, and the remaining is to be purchased by the County at $15,470 per acre, which is the same price per acre as the developer purchased the land in May, 1999. The total purchase acquisition is approx. 4.39 acres at a cost of $67,900.73. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The alternatives presented are as follows: Alternative No. 1 Purchase the right-of-way at $67,900.73. This right-of-way is needed to improve the 43`" Avenue/Oslo Road intersection at this time, as well as future road widening along both roads. Alternative No, 2 Deny purchasing the right-of-way. Staff recommends approval to purchase the right-of-way at $67,900.73. Funding to be from 10 Local Option Sales Tax Fund allocated for right-of-way acquisition (315-214-541-066.12). ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously approved the right-of-way purchase at $67,900.73 from OnSite Management Group (Steve Melchiori), as recommended by staff. JULY 119 2000 BK114 PG 17 9 -163- � L 11.H.1. PROPOSED BLUE HERON (CALPINE) ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION FACILITY - AMENDMENT "A" TO CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. CONTRACT FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 29, 2000: DATE: JUNE 29. 2000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR THRU: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S ' PREPARED AND STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E. v STAFFED BY: CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER SUBJECT: AMENDMENT 'A' TO CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RELATED TO THE PROPOSED BLUE HERON (CALPINE) ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION FACILITY BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS On January 12, 2000, Calpine Corporation announced plans for the construction of a 1,080 - megawatt natural gas bunging power generation facility to be constructed in Indian River County. See enclosed newspaper article presented in Exhibit -A. Staff has been meeting with the representatives of the Calpme Corp. since their public announcement to determine their needs for "developing" their site. Calpme Corporation has had ongoing discussions with Staff to determine available resources for water, wastewater disposal. reclaimed water, as well as landfill gas recovery. Discussion on available resources and commitments has risen to a level that technical assistance is warranted to ensure that County, FDEP Permitting guidelines and St. John's River Water Management standards have been incorporated in discussions. Currently Camp Dresser & McKee Inc (CDM Inc.) is the professional consultant involved at the County's landfill site, wastewater treatment facilities, water treatment plants and reclaimed water system. CDM has technical overview over the majority of the County's water resources as it relates to Utilities. To protect the County's interest as it relates to Utilities and the Solid Waste District, Staff has requested that CDM Inc. provide technical assistance regarding technical planning issues presented by Calpine Corporation. JULY 119 2000 ON 1 1 4 PG 180 -164- • Attached is CDM Inc. Work Authorization 'A' for professional services to attend meetings and provide technical assist to the County in reviewing the alternative plans proposed by the Developer pertaining to the utilization of the County's Water Resources. CDM Inc.'s Work Authorization is presented in Appendix -B. CONCLUSION It is Staffs recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the following items as outlined above and presented below: 1. Approval of CDM Inc. Amendment 'A' for professional engineering services in the amoum of 3,000 as outlined in the attachment 2. Authorize the Chairman to execute all necessary documents. LIST OF EXHIBITS: Exhibit A. Newspaper Article regarding the Proposed Power Plant — Press Journal dated January 12, 2000 Exhibit B. Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. — Engineering Services, Amendment `A' dated June 6, 2000. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously approved CDM, Inc. Amendment "A" for professional engineering services in the amount of $3,000 and authorized the Chairman to execute all necessary documents, as recommended by staff. WORK AUTHORIZATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD JULY 119 2000 Oux 1 14 PG 1 8 1 -165- L • 11.H.2. EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US#1- REQUEST BY THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 23, 2000: DATE: JUNE 23, 2000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADN 94ISTRATOR \ FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, E. DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S CES PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS AND STAFFED MANAGER OF MENT PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE — CITY OF SEBASTIAN REQUEST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -00 -19 -DS BACKGROUND On March 8*, 2000, the City of Sebastian City Council requested that Indian River County proceed with a water line extension project at the request of the benefiting U.S.#1 merchants. The City Manager of the City of Sebastian has written stating," that it was the consensus of the City Council to request that Indian River County proceed in an expeditious manner in order to facilitate the extension of water lines along the West Side of U. S. # 1-.( Exhibit 1 -City Mgr. Letter ). Staff is now seeking approval to begin design of the above-mentioned project. (See attached Exhibit 2 - Plat Map, and Exhibit 3 —Schedules 1 & 2 Properties to benefit). ANALYSIS There are 74 properties north of Main Street and 28 parcels South of Main Street, between the Wal- Mart Super Center and County Road 512, which may benefit from this proposed water line Extension. ( see attached Exhibit 3 — Schedules 1 & 2). In most water assessment projects, properties along both sides of a waterline ( typical street situation ) share proportionately in the Project cost In this proposed project, which is bordered by U S Highway No. 1 and the FEC Railway, this is not the case. Properties on one side only will be responsible for the project cost which may result in a higher cost to the benefiting properties. Current cost will be accurately estimated during the design process. Design services will be provided by the Department of Utility Services. JULY 119 2000 BK 114 PG 18 -166- 0 0 The attached map (EXHIBIT -2) displays the area to benefit from the assessment project This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water line route. In the interim, financing will be from the assessment fimd. No. 473. Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners, authorize the Department to proceed with the design engineering work and award a contract for survey services based on the most favorable quote, in preparation for the special assessment project, and return to the Board of County Commissioners with an accurate cost estimate and a prepared assessment roll. JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously authorized staff to proceed with the design engineering work and award a contract for survey services based on the most favorable quote in preparation for the special assessment project and directed staff to return with an accurate cost estimate and a prepared assessment roll, as recommended by staff. -167- BK 1 14 PG 18 3 11.H.3. RESOLUTION 2000-075 - FLORAVON SHORES (110 PLACE) WATER SERVICE - FINAL ASSESSMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 23, 2000: TO: JAMES L CHANDLER JUNE 23, 2000 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R.HUBBS, P DIRECTOR OF UTII. PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST� AND STAFFED MANAGER OF PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: FLORAVON SHORES —110TM PLACE WATER SERVICE RESOLUTION IV- FINAL ASSESSMENT BACKGROUND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -99403 -DS On September 28, 1999, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution III, No. 99-106, for the preliminary assessment roll on the above -refinanced project Construction of the project has been completed. Owners have been notified and connections have begun, so stats is requesting the Board's approval of the final assessment roll. (See attached minutes and Resolution IV). The preliminary assessment was for an estimated cast of $43.531.60, which equated to $0.15466 (rounded) per square foot of property assessed. The final assessment (see attached Resolution IV and the accompanying assessment roll), is in the amount of $ 32,499.5 1, which equates to a cost of 50.115966 (rounded) per square foot The final assessment is 50.0387 per squaw foot less than the preliminary assessment 'the staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve adoption of Resolution IV, which is attached, and authorize the chairman to execute same. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-075 certifying "as -built" costs for installation of water service for the Floravon Shores (110` Place) and such other construction necessitated by such project; providing for formal completion date, and date for payment without penalty and interest. JULY 11, 2000 ,` 4 PG 184 -168 0 - As Built (Final Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 2000- .075 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR INSTALLATION OF WATER SERVICE FOR THE FLORAVON SHORES (110TH PLACE) AND SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that water improvements for properties located within the area of Floravon Shores Water Expansion are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county; and WHEREAS, on Tuesday, September 28, 1999, the Board held a public hearing at which time and place the owners of property to be assessed appeared before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements; and WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted Resolution No. 99-106, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that resolution; and WHEREAS, the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual "as -built' cost now that the project has been completed is less than /n confirming Resolution No. 99-106, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. Resolution No. 99-106 is modified as follows: The due date for the referenced project and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is ninety days after passage of this resolution. R 2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8.5% per annum may be made in ten annual installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date. The due date is the date of passage of this resolution. 3. The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No. 99-106 shall be as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 4. The assessments, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," shall stand confirmed, and will remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid. JULY 119 2000 -169- 18 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 0 7 5 5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "A,° attached to'Resolution No. 99-106, were recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall remain prima facie evidence of its validity. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Gi nn , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dae, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Ave Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Ave Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Absent Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Ave Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11th day of July, 2000. Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Attachment. RNAL ASSESSMENT ROLL JULY 119 2000 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bys?J � i i l ��12 ►�c Fran B. Adams Chairman -170- tn/m Pow U Approved Date Admin S P 7/-3/o-) Legal _dp Budget urrL. q Oo BK 114 FIG 186 DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES FINAL ASSESSMENT/IN HOUSE ENGINEERING 6/14/00 PROJECT: 110th Place Water Service-Floravon Shores COSTS CALCULATION Amt Paid to Unpaid Amts Total Amount Date Due Paid Construction: Contractor. Indian River Co. Utilities Crew Indian River Co. Public Works -Paving Equipment Demolition & Debris Materials, Rental at al Total Construction Cost Surveying: Masteiler, Motor & Reed Other. Advertisements. Treasure Coast Newpapers Treasure Coast Newpapers Permits: FOEP Title Search: Postage & Express Charges: FedEx Other Administrative: Subtotal Project Cost before In -House Costs In-house engineering & inspection charges: Design Services (Cost) Bidding Services(Cost) Permitting Services(Cost) Services During Construction(Cost) Administration(Cost) Total Assessment/Project Cost 0 $8,422.00 $8,422.00 $1,483.51 $0.00 $1,483.51 $4,390.00 $4,390.00 $500.00 $500.00 $10,013.00 $10 013.00 $24,808.51 $975.00 $;?man $975.00 $165.00 $57 On $222.00 $250.00 SO.O.O $250.00 $O.00 $0.00 $24,0n $24.00 SIMI $0.4.0 $26,279.51 $3,100.00 $220.00 $170.00 $1,000.00 $32,499.51 APPROVALS: Assistant Director Mgr of Cap Poli. Environ Eng. Mgr of Assess P 00 C-01 tZ �Z® hK 11.HA CITY OF FELLSMERE - UTILITY SERVICES REQUEST The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 11, 2000: DATE: JULY 11, 2000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. H:UBBS, p.E. DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SEI CES SUBJECT: UTIIdTY SERVICES REQUEST BY THE CITY OF FELLSMERE BACKGROUND On August 25, 1998, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved an Inter - Local Agreement between the County and the City of Fellsmere for Wastewater Transmission and Treatment Services, and on July 22, 1999, approved a modified Agreement for same. On March 6, 2000, the City of Fellsmere expressed concerns regarding their contract with Avatar, in particular the provision of operation services at the City's 0.650 m.g.d. Water Treatment Plant. Indian River County has likewise experienced performance difficulties with Avatar for meter reading services and concurs with the City of Fellsmere's concern. On June 7, 2000, the County and City Officials met to discuss mutual concerns regarding the provision of water and sewer services, and the enclosed letter dated July 3, 2000, encapsulates the topic material. On Thursday, July 6, 2000, the County's Utility Advisory Committee heard issues both pro and con regarding the County's provision of additional services for the City of Fellsmere, and agreed that the provision of a part-time Treatment Operator to satisfy the minimum staffing requirement of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), was an acceptable request. The County will be developing an Inter -Local Agreement Addendum to the existing Agreement to be presented to respective Council and Board in the relatively near future. To satisfy the immediate need that the City of Fellsmere has, the County staff has proposed providing a minimum Class "C" Operator, 20 hours per week, at a cost of $22.00 per hour, with after hours and week -end call -outs occurring at time and a half Other terms and conditions will be similar to the enclosed City of Fellsmere's Scope of Services provided by Avatar, dated December, 1996, (billing and off premises activities excluded). There are several efficiency gains that have been made regarding the water operation to allow the additional time necessary to satisfy the City of Fellsmere's request. As an example, the Water Plant Operator's time spent performing ground maintenance has been significantly reduced, that service now being provided by others. JULY 119 2000 -172- qp K 114 PG 18 r ANALYSIS ♦ To allow the Department of Utility Services to provide stopgap operation services until such time as a finalized Agreement Addendum is provided for Board execution, or ♦ To respectfully decline the City of Fellsmere request for services, and request that the City seek relief elsewhere. RECOMMENDATION For the Department of Utility Services to provide a stopgap operation presence to meet operation permit requirements for the City of Fellsmere Water Treatment Plant and to work out a finalized Agreement with the City of Fellsmere for the provision of on-going operation services. JULY 119 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Grin, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously authorized staff to provide a stopgap operation presence to meet operation permit requirements for the City of Fellsmere Water Treatment Plant and to work out a finalized Agreement with the City of Fellsmere for the provisions of on-going operation services, as recommended by staff. -173- BK 114 PG 189 12.A. COUNTY ATTORNEY — CAMILLE O. HOFFMAN — GRANT OF UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENT — PARCEL 108 — INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 21, 2000: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: KV_ William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 21, 2000 SUBJECT: Grant of Utility and Access Easement to Camille O. Hoffman In 1990 Indian River County filed a number of condemnation suits (eminent domain) to acquire right-of-way necessary to extend Indian River Boulevard north to 37th Street in the Indian River Memorial Hospital area. A Stipulated Settlement Agreement dated January 25, 1993 was approved by the County Commission on February 2, 1993 and entered as a final order by the court on March 4, 1993. One of the terms of that Settlement Agreement provided as follows: "The County will grant an access/utility easement from Indian River Boulevard through the Hoffman property (east of Indian River Boulevard and north of Van Valkenberg Creek), thence along the County acquired dike road along County acquired Parcel 108 lying south of Vossinbeny Creek, thence north easterly onto the upland area within the Hoffman Property near the west shoreline of the Indian River (known as the upland peninsula). This easement shall provide for access to the peninsula. In the future Mr. Hoffman or the peninsula property owner will be responsible for environmental permitting, engineering design, and construction of an access road (and bridge(s) if necessary) to provide for physical access. Any such construction will not deter the County from its required management of impoundment #22, unless approved by State and Federal permitting authorities and the County. The location and alignment of the easement shall be mutually agreeable to the County, Florida Department of Transportation, and the property owner." JULY 11, 2000 d 19 0 -174- Mr. O'Haire, representing Camille O. Hoffman has recently prepared a Grant of Easement necessary to implement the Stipulated Final Judgment. The easement location has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Grant of Easement for utilities and access, implementing a Stipulated Final Judgment in Case No. 90 -0434 -CA - 05, Indian River County vs Paul W Hoffman and Camille O. Hoffman, et al. JULY 119 2000 ON MOT10N by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the Grant of Easement for utilities and access, implementing a Stipulated Final Judgment in Case No. 90 -0434 -CA - 05, Indian River County vs. Paul W. Hoffman and Camille O. Hoffman et al., as recommended by staff. GRANT OF EASEMENT WILL BE RECORDED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY -175- BK 1 14 PG 191 12A COUNTY ATTORNEY - APPOINT VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD MEMBERS AND REJECT PER DIEM COMPENSATION The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 26, 2000: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: UeMilliam G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Resolution Appointing Value Adjustment Board Members and Providing for Per Diem Compensation for Value Adjustment Board Members Pursuant to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, the Board is advised to: 1. Appoint by Resolution three members of the Board to serve on the Value Adjustment Board for 2000, with the two remaining members designated as altemates. 2. Determine by resolution per diem compensation to the Value Adjustment Board members. (The School Board elected to provide per diem compensation to VAB members. Last year the BCC elected not to provide per diem compensation.) Appropriate resolutions are attached for your approval. RECOMMENDATION 1. Appoint Board members and aftemates. 2. Approve one of the attached Resolutions. JULY 119 2000 -176- Bwft 114 PG 19 2 • 3. Set a date for an organizational meeting with School Board and Property Appraiser. The Property Appraiser and the School Board members are available for an organizational meeting on August 8, 2000 at 8:45 a.m. The meeting can be held in Conference Room B, located on the 1" floor of the County Administration Building. Deputy County Attorney Will Collins advised that TRIMS are anticipated to go out on August 14', 2000. The Board needs to appoint 3 of their members to sit on the Value Adjustment Board and to decide whether or not they want to waive the per diem compensation. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, that the Board appoint Commissioners Fran B. Adams, Ruth M. Stanbridge, and Kenneth R. Macht to serve on the 2000 Value Adjustment Board, with Commissioners Caroline D. Ginn and John W. Tippin designated as alternates; set the organizational meeting for August 8, 2000 at 8:45 a.m. in Conference Room B of the County Administration Building; and adopt a resolution appointing the 2000 Value Adjustment Board members and rejecting statutory per diem compensation. The Chairman did not call the question and the motion failed. (CLERK'S NOTE: SEE MEETING OF JULY 18, 2000 FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION.) JULY 119 2000 -177- BK 1 14 PG 193 J I U.B. VICE CHAIIUVMAN CAROLINE D. GINN - DODGERS NEGOTIATIONS - PUBLIC WORKSHOP Commissioner Ginn asked for a workshop meeting with the City of Vero Beach Council on the proposed Dodger contract. County Administrator Chandler said it had always been the intent for a full presentation to come before the Board. He was involved in a long negotiating session yesterday and no agreement has been reached. They could tentatively schedule a joint meeting with the City Council for Monday, July 241, 2000 in the event that an agreement should be reached in the next few days. There would need to be a written proposal to be distributed prior to the meeting so that everyone has an opportunity ity to examine and study the proposed agreement. Commissioner Ginn wanted this to be a true workshop meeting without a vote so there is time to reflect on the comments of everyone. CONSENSUS was reached to schedule a tentative joint meeting with City of Vero Beach on Monday, July 24, 2000 provided an agreement can be reached within the next few days. JULY 119 2000 0 -178- BI! 1 1 4 PG 194 I • B.D. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE - PELICAN ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE - REVENUE SHARING CHECK - PRESENTATION BY PAUL TRITAIK The Board reviewed a letter of April 27, 2000: -9 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 3 ',0.q 1875 Century Boulevard Q�•0 Atlanta. Georgia 30345 IN REPLY REFER TO: April 27, 2000 FWS/R4/ARW/RE LA -Payments to Counties Dear County/Parish Official: This is in reference to the annual Refuge Revenue Sharing Payment you receive from the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). As you know, last year's payments were transmitted by electronic funds transfer based on the ACH Vendor/Miscellaneous Payment Enrollment Bank forms you had provided. Due to the numerous problems encountered with our Finance Center's electronic transfer process (advance notice of payment not provided, etc.), our region requested and was granted a waiver to return to payment in the form of hard copy checks. We apologize for the inconvenience this caused many of you last year. The Service is pleased to present Indian River County/Parish its refuge revenue sharing payment (hard copy check) in the amount of $ 29.934.00 This payment is for fiscal year 1999 (October 1, 1998 - September 30, 1999) and is authorized by the Refuge Revenue Sharing Act of 1978, Public Law 95-469. Funds credited to the National Wildlife Refuge Fund are derived from income generated nationally on Service lands, such as oil and gas revenues, sale of timber products, gravel, grazing receipts, and other products. The Act authorizes payment to counties in which Service -owned lands are located, based upon the following methods of computation, whichever is greater: JULY 119 2000 -179- BK 114 PG 195 • I (1) Three-fourths of 1 percent (0.75 percent) of the fair market (appraised) value of fee lands located within the county/parish. (2) Seventy-five cents per acre of the fee lands located within the county/parish. (3) Twenty-five percent of net receipts collected by the Service for certain activities permitted on fee lands located within the county/parish. This year's fund did not contain sufficient receipts to make full payment to counties as computed above. Although Congress, as authorized, did appropriate additional funds, the amount appropriated was not sufficient to provide for a full entitlement program. The amount of payment for fiscal year 1999 represents approximately 58 percent of the total entitlement. In addition, the reason payments to certain counties have significantly increased or decreased from last year's may be due to reappraisals or the acquisition of additional lands. A brief explanation of our revenue sharing process is provided in the enclosed brochure entitled "Shared Revenue Payments." A County Compliance Certification with Section VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964/Check Receipt form must be completed as you receive payment and returned to our Realty office in Atlanta, Georgia, to the attention of Charlotte Underwood. A self-addressed envelope is provided for your convenience. A copy of regulations (43 CFR Part 17) cited on the County Compliance Certification is also enclosed Ifyou have any questions, please feel free to contact Ms. Charlotte Underwood at 1-800-419-9582. JULY 119 2000 Sincerely yours, �n- Sam D. Hamilton 4 Regional Director 196 0 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE b�q yea 1875 Century Boulevard " Atlanta, Georgia 30345 IN REPLY REFER TO FY 1999 REFUGE REVENUE SHARING PAYMENT FORM (October 1. 1998 - September 30. 1999) (PART 1): COUNTY COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION (With Section VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Pertaining to Refuge Revenue Sharing Payments) The undersigned assures that Indian River COUNTY/PARISH will administerpayments under the Refuge Revenue Sharing Act (16 U.S.C. 715s) in accordance with Section VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. 2000d) and in compliance with the regulations issued pursuant thereto, which are contained in 43 CFR Part 17 (attached). 0 � 'Vice Chairman 07-11-2000 COUNTY/PARISH REPRESENTATIVE TITLE DATE (PART 2): RECEIPT FOR CHECK This annual payment is made in accordance with Refuge Revenue Sharing Act, amended in 1978 by Public Law 95-469: COUNTY/PARISH Of Tndi an River STATE Of Florida The check represents the GREATER of three-fourths of 1 percent (0.75 percent) of the fair market (appraised) value of fee land acquired, or 25 percent of net receipts, or 75 cents per acre for fee lands located within the National Wildlife Refuge System in the same County/Parish. RECEIVED BY: COUNTY/PARISH REWnENTATIVE Vice Chairman 07-11-2000 TITLE DATE 3151 50459753 $29,934.00 CHECK NO. CHECK AMOUNT (Please return signed form to Charlotte Underwood at the above address (phone 404/679-7216) JULY 119 2000 Bu 1 14 P 97 -181- I Check No. = 04 11 00 13. SAN FRANCISCOi.CA 3151 50459753 Pay W 596000674 N2 FYS N206000411' 14160006 i' the ordaof j COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVERP. FL RYTu8fSCNTUBLVD $**29934*00 ATLANTA 6A 30345 VOID AFTER ONE YEAR M..M PER ENCLOSED NAILING NOTICE IN 3 1 S I S1N 1:000000 S LBI: 50 4 59 ? 5 3 311' O L0400 Commissioner Stanbridge advised that Paul Tritaik from Fish & Wildlife had been called away from the meeting before this time. She gave a brief explanation of the tree planting project that has been going on, replacing exotics with oaks with grant dollars. Mr. Tritaik had some nice pictures to show to the Board but perhaps he could be persuaded to come back another time. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) unanimously accepted the check from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of $29,934.00 and agreed to refund $9,934 to Fish and Wildlife Service, together with $2,500 received from Beazer Homes as a part of their fines for breaking the tree protection ordinance, to be used for the Jungle Trail tree planting project. JULY 11, 2000 • -182- BN 114 PG 198 • 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of the Emergency Services District Meeting, the Board would reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. U.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD None There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 1:45 p.m. ATTEST: I on, Clerk Fran B. Adams, Chairman Minutes Approved: "7c_)O j JULY 119 2000 -183- BK 114 PG 199 11