HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/8/20000
MINUTES ATTACHED 0
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2000 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
District 1
Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman
District 5
Kenneth R. Macht
District 3
Ruth M. Stanbridge
District 2
John W. Tippin
District 4
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Paul G. Bangel —
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add Item 7.M., Retirement Award and Proclamation to Dennis Gentile, Retiring County Employee.
2. Add Item MAI, Raising Roosters as a Special Exception Use.
3. Add Item 13.C., Discussion regarding Billboards.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Recognition of Roadside Canal Signage/Safety Program
Pilot Club of Vero Beach and Indian River County Public Works
Department
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
EK 1 14 PG 445
1-3
ImOrMi:
7. CONSENT AGENDA PAGES
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1) Ord. 2000-04 of the City of Vero Beach Annexing
Property into the City Limits, which property is generally
located approximately 200 feet east of US 1 and north of
33rd Street, Indian River County, consisting of approximately
7.41 acres, pursuant to Fla. Statutes, Chapter 171, Municipal
Annexation or Contraction, Subsection 171.044 (Feldman
Voluntary Annexation #2000 -AX -01 — Parcel No. 35-32-39-
00000-1000-00035.0)
2) Indian River County Hospital District Proposed Budget
for FY 2000-2001
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated July 27, 2000) 4-13
C. Acknowledgement of Comm. Ruth Stanbridge to serve as a
Vice Chair for the Fla. Assoc. of Counties (FACo) Health and
Human Services Committee 14-16
D. Out of County Travel — Comm. Stanbridge to attend FACo
Health and Human Services Chair briefing in Palatka 17
E. Out of County Travel - Comm. Stanbridge to attend FACo
Health and Human Services Policy Comm. Meeting in Orlando 18
F. Appointment of John W. Tippin to serve on the County
Canvassing Board and Ruth M. Stanbridge as his alternate 19
G. Appointment of Ruth Stanbridge to the Scenic Highway
Corridor Advocacy Group
(no backup provided)
H. Interlocal Agreement Between Florida Housing Finance Cor-
poration and Indian River County for Walker Avenue Club, Ltd.
Multi -Family Revenue Bond
(memorandum dated August 2, 2000) 20-24
I. Shared Services Alliance of Okeechobee and the Treasure
Coast
(memorandum dated July 31, 2000) 25-26
J. Children's Grant Contracts
(memorandum dated July 27, 2000) 27-46
BK 114 PG 446
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES
K. 43`d Ave. Widening and Drainage Improvements
Carter Associates, Inc., Professional Services
Final Payment and Release of Retainage
(memorandum dated July 31, 2000) 4749
L. KNK Ventures, Inc.'s Request for Final PD Plat/
Plan -Approval for a Commercial Planned Development
to be Known as KNK Ventures Subdivision
(memorandum dated August 1, 2000) 50-54
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Sheriff GM C. Wheeler.
A. COPS MORE 98 Renewal, #1999CMWX1815
(letter dated August 1, 2000) 55-57
B. Budget Adjustment, Out -of -County Inmate Revenue
(memorandum dated August 1, 2000) 58-59
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Windsor Properties' Request for Conceptual PD
Plan Modification and Expansion (Legislative)
(memorandum dated July 26, 2000) 60-68
2. St. Marks A.E.C., Inc.'s Request for Special
Exception Use Approval to Construct a Place of
Worship (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated August 1, 2000) 69-78
3. SBA Towers Inc.'s Request for Special Exception
Use Approval to Construct a 300 Foot Tall Multi -
tenant Communications Tower North of Fellsmere
at 14195 122nd Street (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated July 17, 2000) 79-120
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Request from Penny Chandler, Executive Director of Chamber
of Commerce, for Workforce Development Task Force to
Report Findings of One -Year Focus on Gifford Community
(letter dated July 7, 2000) 121
ICK 114 PG 447
BACKUP
9.
PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): PAGES
C.
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
Scheduled for Public Hearing on August 15.2000:
First Baptist Church of Wabasso's Request for an
Abandonment of a Portion of 86h Place (Legislative)
(memorandum dated August 1, 2000) 122
10.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11.
DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A.
Community Development
None
B.
Emergency Services
None
C.
General Services
Assignment of License from Sandab Communications
Limited Partnership II to Vero Beach Broadcasters, LLC
(memorandum dated August 1, 2000) 123-146
_
D.
Leisure Services
None
E.
Office of Management and Budget
None
F.
Personnel
None
G.
Public Works
None
H.
Utilities
None
I.
Human Services
None
12.
COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
BK 114 PG 448
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS BACKUP
A. Chairman Fran B. Adams PAGES
Civic Users and Multi -Family Land Uses as Special
Exceptions
(no backup provided)
B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
C. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
1. Small Area Plan — Gifford
(memorandum dated August 1, 2000) 147
2. Indoor Gun Ranges
(memorandum dated August 2, 2000) 148
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
None
C. Environmental Control Board
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of May 16, 2000
2. Quarterly Report
(memorandum dated August 1, 2000) 149-152
15. ADJOURNMENT
BK 1! 4 PG 449
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p.m.
BK 114 PG 450
0
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AUGUST 8, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER .............................................. .1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... -1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................. .2-
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ........................ .2 -
Roadside Canal Signage/Safety Program - Pilot Club of Vero Beach and Indian
River County Public Works Department ......................... 2-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ....................................... .4-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... .5-
7.A. Reports .................................................. 5-
7.B. List of Warrants ........................................... .5-
7.C. Florida Association of Counties (FACo) Health and Human Services
Committee - Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge to Serve as Vice Chair .. -13-
7.D. Out -of -County Travel - Commissioner Stanbridge to Attend FACo Health
and Human Services Chair Briefing in Palatka .................. .14 -
AUGUST 8, 2000
-1-
6K 1 14 PG 45 1
7.E. Out -of -County Travel - Commissioner Stanbridge to Attend FACo Health
and Human Services Policy Committee Meeting in Orlando ........ .15-
7.F. County Elections Canvassing Board - John W. Tippin Appointed - Ruth
Stanbridge Appointed Alternate ................ .............16-
7.G. Scenic Highway Corridor Advocacy Group - Commissioner Stanbridge
Appointed.............................................. .17-
7.H. Walker Avenue Club, Ltd. Multi -Family Revenue Bond - Interlocal
Agreement with Florida Housing Finance Corporation ............ .17-
7.I. Children's Services Advisory Committee Appointments to Shared Services
Alliance of Okeechobee and the Treasure Coast ................. .19-
7.J. Libraries - Children's Grant Contracts - TLC Newborns - Friends of the
Library - Florida Division of Libraries and Information Services ("Born to
Read" Grant for Project to be Known As "Fantastic Parents/Amazing
Kids") ................................................. .21-
7.K. 43' Avenue Widening and Drainage Improvements - Carter Associates, Inc.
- Final Payment and Release of Retainage ..................... .22-
7.L. KNK Ventures, Inc. - Final PD/Plat Plan Approval for a Commercial
Planned Development to be known as KNK Ventures Subdivision ... -24-
7.M. Dennis Gentile - Retirement Award and Proclamation Upon Retirement
From Indian River County .................................. .26-
8.A. SHERIFF - COPS MORE 98 RENEWAL, #1999CMWX1815 - DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE ................................................. .28 -
AUGUST 8, 2000
8K 114 PG 452
•
8.B. SHERIFF - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR OUT -OF -COUNTY INMATE
REVENUE - APRIL, 2000 ...................................... .29-
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - WINDSOR PROPERTIES - CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN
MODIFICATION AND EXPANSION (Legislative) ................... .31-
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ST. MARKS A.E.C., INC. - SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE
APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A PLACE OF WORSHIP (Quasi -Judicial) . -35-
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - SBA TOWERS, INC. - SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE
APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 300 -FOOT TALL MULTI -TENANT
COMMUNICATIONS TOWER NORTH OF FELLSMERE AT 14195 122ND
STREET (OLIVER J. AND BARBARA CREWS) (Quasi -Judicial) ....... .39-
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE
REPORT ON ONE-YEAR FOCUS ON GIFFORD COMMUNITY (REQUEST
FROM PENNY CHANDLER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE) (FREDDIE WOOLFORK, CHAIRMAN OF TASK FORCE)
............................................................ .50-
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF WABASSO -
REQUEST FOR AN ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF 86TH PLACE
(Legislative) - Scheduled for Public Hearing on August 15, 2000 ......... .60 -
AUGUST 8, 2000
-3-
BK 1 14 PG 453
•
11.C. COMMUNICATIONS TOWER - ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE FROM
SANDAB COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II TO VERO.
BEACH BROADCASTERS, LLC (DEPUE - BONE - SANDAB) ... -62-
13.A.1. CHAIRMAN FRAN B. ADAMS - CIVIC USERS AND MULTI -FAMILY
LAND USES IN SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS .................... .64-
13.A.2. CHAIRMAN FRAN B. ADAMS - RAISING ROOSTERS ......... .64-
13.C. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT - BILLBOARD ORDINANCE
...................................................... .66-
13.D.1. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE - GIFFORD SMALL AREA
PLAN - (FREDDIE WOOLFORK) - WORKFORCE ENHANCEMENT
TASK FORCE - "FRONT PORCH" COMMUNITY ............. .66-
13.D.2. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE - REGULATIONS OF USES
FOR INDOOR GUN RANGES .............................. .68-
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ........................ .69-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ....................... .69-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ..................... .70 -
AUGUST 8, 2000
6K 114 PG 454
August 8, 2000
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 251 Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, August 8, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Kenneth R.
Macht; John W. Tippin; and Ruth Stanbridge. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn was absent
on vacation. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel,
County Attorney; and Patricia "PT' Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Adams called the meeting to order.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
County Attorney Paul Bangel led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-1-
BK 114 PG 455
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Adams requested 3 additions to today's Agenda:
1. Item 7.M., Retirement Award and Proclamation to Dennis Gentile, Retiring
County Employee.
2. Item 13.A.2., Raising Roosters as a Special Exception'Use.
3. Item 13.C., Discussion Regarding Billboards.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously added the above items to the Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
ROADSIDE CANAL SIGNAGE/SAFETYPROGRAM- PILOT CLUB OF VERO
BEACHAND INDIANRIVER COUNTYPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The Board reviewed a letter of May 17, 2000:
f
PILOT CLUB OF VERO BEACH
-- ® — P.O. BOX 7049
VERO BEACH, FL 32961
1
May 17, 2000
T0: James W. Davis, Dir.
Public Works
Indian River County
FROM: Beth Megelin, Ch.
Safety Division
Pilot Club of Vero Beach
Thank you for your very kind letter of May 3, regarding
this Club's proposal to share in the funding of Safety
Signs for Canals in our area. Enclosed is our check for
$600. to begin this project.
AUGUST S, 2000
BK 1 1 4 PG 466
-2-
0 0
•
I am looking forward to viewing the preliminary signs for
this project, with great anticipation. (As per your
letter of the third.)
This marks another cooperative effort between this Club
and the County. In 1972 we began the first paper recycling
program in the area, with the assistance from the County who
offered to transport collections to Rockledge. The project
covered a 6 -year period when it was discontinued because of
the depressed market for paper, and we could find no one to
accept it. I thought you might be interested in a couple of
statements of those days.
As spokeGman for our Club in this Safety Project, we all
look forward to the placement of the first of these signs,
as a major step in Safety Awareness for all who travel these
areas.
Sincerely,
l.
B th 114eaelin
ROADSIDE CANAL SIGNAGE/SAFETY PROGRAM
PILOT CLUB OF VERO BEACH AND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AUGUST, 2000
Since the early 1920's when many of Indian River County's road and canal
systems were constructed, roadways have been in close proximity to deep drainage
canals. As traffic continues to increase in the County, a roadside canal awareness
program is needed.
The Pilot Club of Vero Beach and County Public Works Department have
developed a roadside canal signage program to inform residents and visitors of the close
proximity of roads and canals. The Pilot Club has donated $600 to the County in
FY1999/2000 to pay for sign materials. The County is matching the donation. Initial
sign placement will commence August 8, 2000 along 2& Avenue between SR60 and 12d'
Street. Additional roadways such as 66`h Avenue (Lateral "A" Road) between SR60 and
53rd Street are scheduled for signage during the year 2000. Roadways with high traffic
count will be given highest priority.
«
PILOT CLUB OF VERO BEACH, INC.
93-9419
. cAn: oZ(/ a v ago
nnivA�RS ®G�
267084 L99i:2600000B66836u.!�
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK 1 14 PG 457
-3-
Public Works Director Jim Davis stated that the Pilot Club and the Public Works
Department have been working together on initiating a roadside canal safety program. Since
the 1920s the roads have been in close proximity to deep drainage canals. The Pilot Club
has a long history of public service. They initiated one of the first recycling systems in the
County. They have now donated funds for placement and construction of the canal warning
signs and the County will match those funds. These signs will enhance the safety of the road
system and hopefully reduce the number of accidents. The roadways with the highest traffic
count will be given priority for placement of the signs.
Beth Megelin, Chairman of the Pilot Club of Vero Beach, thanked the County
Commission for the support given to the Pilot Club over the past 30 years. She stated that
Mr. Davis is correct in that the Pilot Club started the recycling program in the County.
Materials were trucked up to Rockledge for about 5 years and they collected over 1600 tons
of paper to keep it out of the County Landfill. Another project they worked on was the 911
system which was started in October of 1982. In 1994 they initiated a safety award program
and the first award was given to the Sheriff and 4 officers. who rescued 3 women from a
canal. Since that time we have had several canal related incidents. Guard rails are
wonderful but expensive and a lot of our streets do not have room for these rails. She offered
her compliments to the Public Works Department for the design of the signs which are
entirely different from any other roadway signs. Many of our visitors do not read English
but should still be able to take warning from the signs.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK 1 14 PG 458
-4-
• 0
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. REPORTS
The following reports have been received and are on file in the office of the Clerk to
the Board:
1. Ordinance 2000-04 of the City of Vero Beach Annexing Property into the City
Limits, which property is generally located approximately 200 feet east of US
1 and north of 33' Street, Indian River County, consisting of approximately
7.41 acres, pursuant to Fla. Statutes, Chapter 171, Municipal Annexation or
Contraction, SubSection 171.044 (Feldman Voluntary Annexation#2000-AX-
01 -Parcel No. 35-32-39-00000-1000-00035.0).
2. Indian River County Hospital District Proposed Budget for FY 2000-01
7.B. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 27, 2000:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: JULY 27, 2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of July 21, 2000 to July 27, 2000.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-5-
BK 1 14 PG 459
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for July 21, 2000 through
July 27, 2000, as recommended by staff.
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0020672
FLORIDA COMBINED LIFE
2000-07-21
2,741.58
0020673
RODDENBERRY, ALFRED
2000-07-21
1,233.60
0020674
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
2000-07-26
1,102.00
0286636
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-07-27
724.00
0286637
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
2000-07-27
161.45
0286638
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
2000-07-27
683.08
0286639
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
2000-07-27
10.56
_
0286640
ALCALDE, RENATO MD
2000-07-27
3,450.00
0286641
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
2000-07-27
105.75
0286642
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
2000-07-27
1,126.53
0286643
ABS PUMPS, INC
2000-07-27
144.00
0286644
ACTION DIESEL INJECTION
2000-07-27
123.45
0286645
A P C O INSTITUTE
2000-07-27
128.40
0286646
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
2000-07-27
116.00
0286647
ADDISON OIL CO
2000-07-27
151.38
0286648
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2000-07-27
44.87
0286649
A T & T
2000-07-27
49.89
0286650
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC
2000-07-27
49.30
0286651
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
2000-07-27
1,226.22
0286652
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
2000-07-27
77.00
0286653
ARCH PAGING
2000-07-27
846.01
0286654
AMERICAN WATER CHEMICALS, INC
2000-07-27
973.50
0286655
AMERITREND HOMES
2000-07-27
1,000.00
0286656
ASSOCIATES, THE
2000-07-27
8,114.37
0286657
AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING CORP
2000-07-27
39.95
0286658
ALTAMIRA PRESS
2000-07-27
59.96
0286659
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
2000-07-27
329.58
0286660
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
2000-07-27
3,589.50
0286661
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2000-07-27
8,590.76
0286662
BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY
2000-07-27
1,713.01
0286663
BARTON, JEFFREY K
2000-07-27
5,762.00
0286664
BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-07-27
1,829.79
0286665
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
2000-07-27
374.00
0286666
BRODART CO
2000-07-27
56.59
0286667
BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE
2000-07-27
200.00
0286668
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
2000-07-27
44.69
0286669
BELLSOUTH
2000-07-27
13,182.25
0286670
BEAZER HOMES, INC
2000-07-27
2,000.00
0286671
BENSON, DANIEL MD
2000-07-27
200.00
AUGUST 8, 2000
AFMCE M01
rI
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0286672
BETTER COPY CENTER, A
2000-07-27
160.14
0286673
BOTTOM LINE/PERSONAL
2000-07-27
39.00
0286674
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
2000-07-27
16,640.38
0286675
BENJAMIN, JOHNNY C JR MD
2000-07-27
190.00
0286676
BARRETT, SOREN PH D
2000-07-27
500.00
0286677
BROOM, JENNEI LUE
2000-07-27
38.11
0286678
B & S SOD INC
2000-07-27
270.00
0286679
BECKETT, TRACY L
2000-07-27
32.21
0286680
BROOMELL, RICHARD B & KATHLEEN
2000-07-27
48.05
0286681
BEST WESTERN - KISSIMMEE
2000-07-27
179.85
0286682
BRYANT, GORDON
2000-07-27
300.00
0286683
BELLSOUTH
2000-07-27
46.21
0286684
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-07-27
9,826.56
0286685
CITRUS MOTEL
2000-07-27
36.00
0286686
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
2000-07-27
21.00
0286687
COASTAL GRAPHICS
2000-07-27
478.00
0286688
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
2000-07-27
540.23
0286689
COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC
2000-07-27
34.00
0286690
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
2000-07-27
4,216.34
0286691
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
2000-07-27
8,536.74
0286692
CLINIC PHARMACY
2000-07-27
693.00
0286693
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
2000-07-27
147.27
0286694
CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
2000-07-27
236.05
0286695
COAST TO COAST JANITOR SVS
2000-07-27
695.00
0286696
CULBERT, DANIEL F
2000-07-27
23.99
0286697
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
2000-07-27
48.75
0286698
CLEARSHIELD OF INDIAN RIVER CO
2000-07-27
5,393.80
0286699
CSR AMERICA, INC.
2000-07-27
211.12
0286700
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
2000-07-27
285.00
0286701
COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF
2000-07-27
17.68
0286702
CHASE, WILLIAM J.
2000-07-27
500.00
0286703
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY
2000-07-27
61,114.56
0286704
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
2000-07-27
150.00-
0286705
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
2000-07-27
8,116.37
0286706
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
2000-07-27
1,262.99
0286707
COLUMBIA PROPANE
2000-07-27
10.50
0286708
CENTER POINT PUBLISHING
2000-07-27
66.48
0286709
CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
2000-07-27
3,087.69
0286710
COSTELLO, DELBERT & OPAL
2000-07-27
79.86
0286711
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
2000-07-27
1,101.30
0286712
DAVIS, JAMES
2000-07-27
20.30
0286713
DEEP SI% DIVE SHOP, INC
2000-07-27
35.70
0286714
DEMCO INC
2000-07-27
1,416.69
0286715
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
2000-07-27
947.57
0286716
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
2000-07-27
%78.40
0286717
DUVAL FORD
2000-07-27
35,790.00
0286718
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
2000-07-27
52.23
0286719
DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING &
2000-07-27
800.00
0286720
DADE PAPER COMPANY
2000-07-27
473.00
0286721
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
2000-07-27
114.59
0286722
DESANTIS, BARBARA
2000-07-27
39.95
0286723
DOWDELL, BRIAN MD
2000-07-27
500.00
0286724
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
2000-07-27
57.00
0286725
ERCILDOUNE BOWLING LANES
2000-07-27
186.00
0286726
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
2000-07-27
20,508.60
0286727
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES
2000-07-27
227.75
0286728
FERE%
2000-07-27
22.50
0286729
FLORIDA COOPERATIVE E%TENSION
2000-07-27
2,889.25
0286730
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
2000-07-27
223.50
0286731
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW
2000-07-27
600.00
0286732
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
2000-07-27
11,542.62
0286733
FLORIDA TODAY/USA TODAY
2000-07-27
83.46
AUGUST 8, 2000 Bl 114 PG 4 6 I
-7-
0
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER
0286734
FLORIDA TREND
2000-07-27
14.98
0286735
FLORIDA DEPT OF LABOR/EMPLOYMT
2000-07-27
1,768.77
0286736
FLETCHER'S APPLIANCE AND
2000-07-27
548.00
0286737
FLORIDA A P A
2000-07-27
275.00
0286738
FOOT -JOY DRAWER
2000-07-27
68.66
0286739
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
2000-07-27
51.50
0286740
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
2000-07-27
1,575.00
0286741
FLINN, SHEILA I
2000-07-27
143.50
0286742
FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
2000-07-27
21.75
0286743
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
2000-07-27
18.52
0286744
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
2000-07-27
674.55
0286745
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
2000-07-27
33.00
0286746
FACTICON, INC
2000-07-27
1,800.00
0286747
FACTS ON FILE INC
2000-07-27
134.95
0286748
FELIX EQUITIES, INC
2000-07-27
106,919.17
0286749
FLEMMING, ANTONIC
2000-07-27
422.30
0286750
FULLER, APRIL L
2000-07-27
19.32
0286751
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
2000-07-27
143.50
0286752
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
2000-07-27
187.75
0286753
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-07-27
136.79
0286754
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
2000-07-27
49.47
0286755
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
2000-07-27
26.20
0286756
GASBOY INTERNATIONAL, INC
2000-07-27
300.00
0286757
GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION
2000-07-27
134.49
0286758
GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER
2000-07-27
5,176.79
0286759
GOLLNICK, PEGGY
2000-07-27
185.50
0286760
GARCIA, HERLINDO & MARIA
2000-07-27
1,250.00
0286761
HECTOR TURF, INC
2000-07-27
11,364.30
0286762
HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC
2000-07-27
69.91
0286763
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
2000-07-27
952.71
02861664
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
2000-07-27
644.00
0286765
HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER
2000-07-27
2,083.33
0286766
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
2000-07-27
60,709.56
0286767
HINSCH, GEORGE & ANITA
2000-07-27
120.69
0286768
HALL, ROBERT
2000-07-27
500.00
0286769
HOLIDAY INN
2000-07-27
195.00
0286770
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2000-07-27
2,000.00
0286771
HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
2000-07-27
569.15
0286772
HAGA, ALICE DARLENE
2000-07-27
56.00
0286773
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-07-27
73,613.08
0286774
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
2000-07-27
5,427.12
0286775
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-07-27
75.00
0286776
INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
2000-07-27
380.00
0286777
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
2000-07-27
784.41
0286778
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
2000-07-27
94.07
0286779
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
2000-07-27
109.18
0286780
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-07-27
272.00
0286781
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
2000-07-27
3,854.25
0286782
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
2000-07-27
1,161.06
0286783
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2000-07-27
123,060.98
0286784
IVEY JR, ROBERT WAYNE
2000-07-27
18.03
0286785
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS
2000-07-27
62.02
0286786
INDIAN RIVER MRI, INC
2000-07-27
500.00
0286787
JACKSON ELECTRONICS
2000-07-27
11.84
0286788
JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS
2000-07-27
55.00
0286789
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
2000-07-27
214.12
0286790
JUDICIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
2000-07-27
205.00
0286791
JUNIOR LIBRARY GUILD
2000-07-27
65.70
0286792
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
2000-07-27
1,416.93
0286793
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
2000-07-27
473.95
0286794
JOINER, VALERIE
2000-07-27
1,250.00-
0286795
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
2000-07-27
1,276.00
0286796
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-07-27
20,357.95
AUGUST S, 2000
0
AUGUST 8, 2000
BK 1 14 PG 463
-9-
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0286797
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
2000-07-27
85.86
0286798
KELLY TRACTOR CO
2000-07-27
672.52
0286799
KEY, PATRICIA W
2000-07-27
392.00
0286800
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
2000-07-27
22.38
0286801
LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
2000-07-27
3,300.00
0286802
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
2000-07-27
3,189.78
0286803
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
2000-07-27
94.64
0286804
LFI VERO BEACH, INC
2000-07-27
4,043.60
0286805
LESCO, INC
2000-07-27
269.90
0286806
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
2000-07-27
121.29
0286807
LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES
2000-07-27
305.00
0286808
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
2000-07-27
315.89
0286809
MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
2000-07-27
25.00
0286810
MUNICIPAL SUPPLY &
2000-07-27
6,333.75
0286811
MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
2000-07-27
3,472.46
0286812
MATRX MEDICAL REPAIR CTR
2000-07-27
542.01
0286813
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
2000-07-27
39.93
0286814
MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
2000-07-27
969.38
0286815
MARC INDUSTRIES
2000-07-27
694.29
0286816
MEDCHECK
2000-07-27
201.39
0286817
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
2000-07-27
500.00
0286818
MILLER, JOSEPH C
2000-07-27
116.57
0286819
MURPHY, DEBBIE
2000-07-27
136.50
0286820
MAXWELL, KIMBERLY
2000-07-27
28.33
0286821
MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES, INC
2000-07-27
26.88
0286822
MARRIOTT WATERSIDE
2000-07-27
594.00
0286823
MILES, JAMES
2000-07-27
300.00
0286824
MARCUM, WILLIAM B & ROBERT
2000-07-27
45.73
0286825
MORTON SALT
2000-07-27
748.76
0286826
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
2000-07-27
20.64
0286827
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
2000-07-27
99.00
0286828
N E C BUSINESS NETWORK
2000-07-27
3,357.=
0286829
NFSES
2000-07-27
90.00
0286830
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
2000-07-27
558.62
0286831
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
2000-07-27
981.96
0286832
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
2000-07-27
235.52
0286833
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
2000-07-27
9,364.94
0286834
O'TOOLE, SUSAN
2000-07-27
500.00
0286835
OWATONNA EQUIPMENT COMPANY
2000-07-27
81,099.14
0286836
PETTY CASH
2000-07-27
54.98
0286837
POST, LORRAINE M
2000-07-27
9.57
0286838
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
2000-07-27
1,000.00
0286839
PETTY CASH
2000-07-27
14.68
0286840
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
2000-07-27
245.39
0286841
POSTMASTER
2000-07-27
132.00
0286842
PARRISH, JAMES L PE
2000-07-27
1,952.75
0286843
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
2000-07-27
241.50
0286844
PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT
2000-07-27
157.75
0286845
PUBLIX PHARMACY
2000-07-27
26.00
0286846
PROSPER, JANET C
2000-07-27
101.50
0286847
PATTI, DAVID
2000-07-27
217.00
0286848
PRIMO'S HOME INTERIORS
2000-07-27
500.00
0286849
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
2000-07-27
10,628.09
0286850
RADIOSHACK
2000-07-27
71.68
0286851
RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC
2000-07-27
1,503.51
0286852
RANGEMASTER S E, INC
2000-07-27
300.00
0286853
RECORDED BOOKS INC
2000-07-27
175.20
0286854
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
2000-07-27
64.00
0286855
REXEL CONSOLIDATED
2000-07-27
1,070.00
AUGUST 8, 2000
BK 1 14 PG 463
-9-
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0286856
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
2000-07-27
1,323.23
0286857
ROMANO, CHRISTINA
2000-07-27
36.05
0286858
RAUTH, GENE
2000-07-27
25.14
0286859
ROYAL, THOMAS
2000-07-27
40.02
0286860
RASMUSSEN, KARA
2000-07-27
218.88
0286861
RCL DEVELOPMENT
2000-07-27
500.00
0286862
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
2000-07-27
75.60
0286863
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
2000-07-27
156.00
0286864
SEARS
2000-07-27
59.92
0286865
SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
2000-07-27
38.78
0286866
SMART CORPORATION
2000-07-27
6.55
0286867
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
2000-07-27
485.41
0286868
SPENCER PEST CONTROL
2000-07-27
85.00
0286869
SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
2000-07-27
35.45
0286870
SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
2000-07-27
33.89
0286871
SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
2000-07-27
9,461.45
0286872
SEXTON, HILDY
2000-07-27
80.00
0286873
SELIG CHEMICAL IND
2000-07-27
445.20
0286874
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
2000-07-27
552.00
0286875
SPEEGLE CONSTRUCTION, INC
2000-07-27
88,348.50
0286876
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
2000-07-27
420.70
0286877
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
2000-07-27
2,571.50
0286878
STEVENS PRINTING
2000-07-27
822.00
0286879
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-07-27
955.59
0286880
SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC
2000-07-27
64.19
0286881
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
2000-07-27
21.92
0286882
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2000-07-27
85.00
0286883
S & S WORLDWIDE
2000-07-27
15.98
0286884
SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC
2000-07-27
133,462.00
0286885
SECURITY FIRST TITLE PARTNERS
2000-07-27
239.17
0286886
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-07-27
50.00
0286887
STEWART, LINDA
2000-07-27
14.21
0286888
S C B EQUITIES
2000-07-27
32.46
0286889
SUNCOAST MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE
2000-07-27
712.50
0286890
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-07-27
905.59
0286891
SMITH, JEFFREY R
2000-07-27
6.00
0286892
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
2000-07-27
38.63
0286893
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-07-27
6,720.84
0286894
TITLEIST DRAWER
2000-07-27
295.18
0286895
TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES
2000-07-27
532.76
0286896
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
2000-07-27
183.06
0286897
TREASURE COAST SPORTS
2000-07-27
2,500.00
0286898
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
2000-07-27
744.35
0286899
UPTON'S PRINTING
2000-07-27
93.95
0286900
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
2000-07-27
2,149.20
0286901
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-07-27
2,052.54
0286902
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
2000-07-27
804.17
0286903
VERO MOTEL
2000-07-27
80.00
0286904
VERO MARINE CENTER, INC
2000-07-27
107.42
0286905
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-07-27
74.23
0286906
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-07-27
85.00
0286907
VERO BOWL
2000-07-27
580.80
0286908
VERO HERITAGE, INC
2000-07-27
1,302.05
0286909
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
2000-07-27
72.03
0286910
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
2000-07-27
5,939.57
0286911
VERO COLLISION CENTER
2000-07-27
210.00
0286912
VALVE & CONTROLS
2000-07-27
83.61
0286913
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000-07-27
427.31
0286914
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000-07-27
184.22
0286915
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
2000-07-27
71.76
0286916
WILLHOFF, PATSY
2000-07-27
130..00
0286917
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
2000-07-27
118.80
0286918
WILLIAMS, BETTY R, RN
2000-07-27
66.00
0286919
WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF
2000-07-27
9,095.96
AUGUST 8, 2000
•
CHECK
NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT
0286920
WOLFE, ERIN
2000-07-27
38.63
0286921
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
2000-07-27
294.47
0286922
WALGREEN CO
2000-07-27
1,156.18
0286923
WILLIAM GLOVER INC
2000-07-27
85,302.43
0286924
WIEDEMANN, BRUCE A
2000-07-27
300.00
0286925
WESTERMAN, ALFRED C
2000-07-27
151.93
0286926
WII INC (CAFE VIENNA)
2000-07-27
500.00
0286927
XEROX CORPORATION
2000-07-27
1,745.83
0286928
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
2000-07-27
649.00
0286929
TURNER BUILDERS
2000-07-27
32.85
0286930
SMITH, LUCILLE
2000-07-27
49.02
0286931
KRAUSE, JEANNETTE
2000-07-27
26.29
0286932
BRANDON CAPITAL CORPORATION
2000-07-27
155.84
0286933
MCKENZIE, A C
2000-07-27
10.27
0286934
GREENE, GRIFFIN
2000-07-27
6.63
0286935
LUCAS, PAUL
2000-07-27
23.10
0286936
CAL BUILDERS, INC
2000-07-27
62.23
0286937
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS, INC
2000-07-27
49.72
0286938
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
2000-07-27
69.07
0286939
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
2000-07-27
80.20
0286940
FETZER, CAROLYN
2000-07-27
22.21
0286941
PENSCH, ALBERT C
2000-07-27
14.97
0286942
HINES, RANDY
2000-07-27
35.89
0286943
COUNTRYSIDE N MOBILE HOME PARK
2000-07-27
45.57
0286944
WHITE, JAMES K
2000-07-27
49.03
0286945
DE BRULE, JANN M
2000-07-27
24.07
0286946
BAER JR, JOHN F
2000-07-27
34.11
0286947
FRANKLIN, CERVANA
2000-07-27
24.17
0286948
GHO VERO BEACH INC
2000-07-27
53.55
0286949
PERRY, ROBERT
2000-07-27
61.88
0286950
METROPOLITAN MTG CO
2000-07-27
81.07 _
0286951
LANG, DAVID
2000-07-27
70.18
0286952
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
2000-07-27
50.00
0286953
MORGNER JR, WALTER
2000-07-27
44.53
0286954
HAAS, MURIEL
2000-07-27
34.74
0286955
EMEIGH, SHANNON
2000-07-27
17.14
0286956
FITZPATRICK SR, DONALD
2000-07-27
117.46
0286957
WOODS, BRENDA K
2000-07-27
87.46
0286958
TAN, MAISIE A H MUAY
2000-07-27
48.32
0286959
SCHOFIELD, MELINDA
2000-07-27
29.37
0286960
SHAFFER, K A
2000-07-27
121.96
0286961
SEVILLE, JOHN P
2000-07-27
72.07
0286962
VILLMANN, MARK D
2000-07-27
87.65
0286963
VALLEJO, ABRAHAM
2000-07-27
42.30
0286964
BRIGHTSEN, JOHN R
2000-07-27
52.22
0286965
BROWN, ZENAIDA
2000-07-27
42.01
0286966
LEE, EILEEN P
2000-07-27
74.52
0286967
TERRELL, SHERRY R
2000-07-27
50.02
0286968
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
2000-07-27
71.37
0286969
BROOKS, DANIEL L
2000-07-27
21.12
0286970
SMITH, KARIN
2000-07-27
76.93
0286971
AMERITREND HOMES
2000-07-27
54.88
0286972
ACQUAVITA, ALICE
2000-07-27
47.83
0286973
PILECKI, DEANNA
2000-07-27
98.33
0286974
LOSEY, HENRY E
2000-07-27
4.97
0286975
SAMMONS, DAVID & NINA
2000-07-27
86.43
0286976
FINE DESIGNER DELIVERIES
2000-07-27
36.05
0286977
MILLER, RANDAL
2000-07-27
66.30
0286978
FEIR, ANNE B
2000-07-27
33.82
0286979
BRANDENBURG, BETH A
2000-07-27
44.58
AUGUST 8, 2000
-11-
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
0286980
VANDENBEMDEN, LISA
2000-07-27
22.32
0286981
CANARY, PAMELA
2000-07-27
45.51
0286982
GANGEMI, G T
2000-07-27
32.87
0286983
COATS, BONNIE & MARK
2000-07-27
6.92
0286984
DARBY, CHARLES D
2000-07-27
64.95
0286985
STEINER, FRANCES H
2000-07-27
45.07
0286986
KELLY CONSTRUCTION & DEV INC
2000-07-27
50.96
0286987
CLAYTON, VIVIAN B
2000-07-27
26.08
0286988
KATEB, JANET
2000-07-27
77.04
0286989
MASTELLONE, MAUREEN
2000-07-27
51.23
0286990
BELL, KELYAN
2000-07-27
60.42
0286991
GALLAHER JR, JOSEPH
2000-07-27
45.56
0286992
BROWN, MARY H
2000-07-27
29.27
0286993
EINIG, DORIS & ROBERT
2000-07-27
39.67
0286994
BORELLO, ERIC THOMAS
2000-07-27
51.62
0286995
NOLAN, MARY C
2000-07-27
63.92
0286996
MORRIS, JESSICA
2000-07-27
1.66
0286997
GARONE, MICHAEL
2000-07-27
31.25
0286998
COFFEY, FRANCIS M
2000-07-27
29.68
02$(999
COLAS, IMMACULA VEDRINE
2000-07-27
49.77
0287000
BOSTICK, CICI LADONNE
2000-07-27
4.73
0287001
B & B MARINE SERVICES
2000-07-27
76.26
0287002
FLEMING, KATHY C
2000-07-27
49.00
0287003
SIMMONS, JO ANNE
2000-07-27
46.85
0287004
LIMA, LUDIMILA
2000-07-27
47.16
0287005
LEIDY III, CARTER R
2000-07-27
61.30
0287006
GARGER, MARILYN
2000-07-27
54.74
0287007
CAGLE, VANESSA
2000-07-27
39.73
0287008
BOLD, NANCY J
2000-07-27
64.09
0287009
ANDERSON III, HAROLD
2000-07-27
23.38
0287010
KNAPP, EVA
2000-07-27
58.94
0287011
KNAPMILLER, RANDS
2000-07-27
77.32
0287012
SCOTT, DEMPSEY C
2000-07-27
50.00
1,212,723.78
AUGUST 8, 2000
! 114 PG 466
-12-
• 0
•
Z C. FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES (FACO) HEALTHAND HUMAN
SERVICES COMMITTEE - COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE TO SERVE
AS VICE CHAIR
The Board reviewed a letter of June 1, 2000:
FLOR i
June 1, 2000 ASSOC
IA77 P.O. Box 5.19/Tallaliasser Honda 32302
COt:/N ,� •�
The Honorable Ruth Stanbridge M-- OS01913.4300 S-- - 293-4300 FAX. 85014m.,-SOl
Indian River County
1850 25'" Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Commissioner Stanbridge:
As I approach the beginning of my term as the President of the Florida Association of
Counties, I would like to thank you for agreeing to serve as Vice Chair of the Health and
Human Services Committee. As Vice Chair you will be asked to solicit input from other
county commissioners and county staff on your issue area, work with the FAC
legislative staff to develop policy initiatives and positions, and assist In conducting policy
committee meetings. You will also work with our lobbying team during session on
issues affecting county government Enclosed is a list of my committee appointments
for chairs and vice chaim..k;JO &i _B w
The policy committee meetings have been scheduled for
October 5.6, 2000
Clarion Plaza Hotel in Orlando —
9700International Drive
Orlando, Florida 32819.8114
PH: 4071996.9700 or FAX: 4071996-9111
Reservations: 800.6278258
Again, thank you for your participation. I look forward to working with you during my
term. Sincerely,
---'�'
J Jo son
President -Elect
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved Commissioner Stanbridge's
appointment as Vice Chairman of the Florida
Association of Counties, Health and Human Services
Committee.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-13-
8K114PG467
•
ZD. OUT -OF -COUNTY .TRAVEL -COMMISSIONER STANBRIDGE TO ATTEND
FACO HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES CHAIR BRIEFING IN PALATKA
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 13, 2000:
M■�■■a
MAI
FGATTMMII �LAM& N >t ■
ASSO�pl! i Own PO. cox sr9iUiwusxe, Florida szsoz
x COl1 �' 0ON AWW 8501922-4.100 �«�: 292-4300 FAX.*00148&7301
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM JUL 1711100
AAO OF COUNTY
TO: Commissioner Linda Myers, Putnam County COMMISSION
Commissioner Cliff Thaell, Leon County
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge, Indian River County
FROM: Joe Anne Hart, Legislative Affairs Coordinator
DATE: July 13, 2000
RE: FAC's Health and Human Services Chairs Briefing
Thank you for agreeing to meet on Thursday, August 17, from 10:00 am. —12:00
p.m. to discuss potential legislative issues to be addressed at the October policy
committee meeting. The meeting will take place at the Putnam State Bank, '
Conference Room, 350 State Road 19 North, Palatka Immediately following the
meeting, we will dine for lunch at the Holiday Inn In downtown Palatka. At a later date, I
will forward a list of preliminary issues to be discussed.
Should you need any additional Information, please contact me at (850) 922-4300 or
lshartOfl-courtles.com.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved out -of -County travel for
Commissioner Stanbridge to attend the Florida
Association of Counties, Health and Human Services
Chair Briefing in Palatka on August 17, 2000.
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK 114 PG 468
•
ZE. OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL - COMMISSIONER STANBRIDGE TO ATTEND
FACO HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING
IN ORLANDO
The Board reviewed a letter of June 1, 2000:
June 1, 2000 FLOR a " �, .3
ASSOuan
The Honorable Ruth Stanbridge W COU '� Z PU. Box 549/WhthaUft Florida 32302
Indian River County . l °�1Op" as°i9u�soo S--'"2-43= FAX. -8S0148&, -50j
1850 251i Street
Vero Beam, Florida 32960
Dear Commissioner Stanbridge:
As I approach the beginning of my term as the President of the Florida Association of
Counties, I would Oka to thank you for agreeing to serve as Vice Chair of the Health and
Human Services Committee. As Vice Chair you will be asked to solicit input from other
county commissioners and county staff on your Issue area, work with the FAC
legislative staff to develop policy initiatives and positions, and assist In conducting policy
committee meetings. You will also work with our lobbying team during session on
issues affecting county government Enclosed Is a list of my committee appointments
for chairs and vice chairs.
The policy committee meetings have been scheduled for.
October 5.6, 2000 O
Clarion Plaza Hotel in Orlando
8700 International Drive
Orlando, Florida 32819.8114
PH: 4071998.8700 or FAX: 4071996.8111
Reservations: 800627-8258
Again, thank you for your participation. I look forward to working with you during my
term.
Sincerely,
J Jo n
President -Sect
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved out -of -County travel for
Commissioner Stanbridge to attend the Florida
Association of Counties, Health and Human Services
Policy Committee in Orlando on October 5 and 6,
2000.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-15-
•
ZF. COUNTYELECTIONS CANVASSING BOARD - JOHN W. TIPPIIV
APPOINTED - R UTH STANBRIDGE APPOINTED ALTERNATE
The Board reviewed the following:
102.141 County canvassing board; duties.
(1) The county canvassing board shall be composed of the supervisor
of elections; a county court judge, who shall act as chair; and the chair of the
board of county commissioners. In the event any member of the county
canvassing board is unable to serve, is a candidate who has opposition in the
election being canvassed, or is an active participant in the campaign or
candidacy of any candidate who has opposition in the election being
canvassed, such member shall be replaced as follows:
(c) If the chair of the board of county commissioners is unable to serve
or is disqualified, the board of county commissioners shall appoint as a
substitute member one of its members who is not a candidate with opposition
in the election being canvassed and who is not an active participant in the
campaign or candidacy of any candidate with opposition in the election
being canvassed.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved the appointment of
Commissioner John W. Tippin to serve on the
County Canvassing Board for the year 2000, with
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge to serve as his
alternate.
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK i 14 PG 470
-16-
L]
•
•
7. G. SCENIC HIGHWAY CORRIDOR ADVOCACY GROUP - COMMISSIONER
STANBRIDGE APPOINTED
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously appointed Commissioner Ruth
Stanbridge to serve on the Scenic Highway Corridor
Advocacy Group.
7.H. WALKER AVENUE CLUB, LTD. MULTI-FAMILYREVENUE BOND -
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITHFLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE
CORPORATION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 2, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: August 2, 2000
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement Between Florida Housing Finance
Corporation and Indian River County for Walker Avenue
Club, Ltd. Multi -Family Revenue Bond
FROM: Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator
The Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 9, 1999
approved a resolution enabling Walker Avenue Club, Ltd. to issue multi -family revenue bonds
in an amount not to exceed $9,100,000. The principal amount, not to exceed $1,600,000 from
the local allocation, will be used by Florida Housing in combination with Florida Housing bond
volume allocation in an amount not to exceed $7,500,000.
AUGUST S, 2000
-17-
BK 1 14 PG 47 1
•
The attached Interlocal Agreement is needed to keep the Walker Avenue Club Ltd. bond
allocation open and for Florida Housing Finance Corporation (FHFC) to commence bond
validation on behalf of itself and Indian River County. The County's bond counsel drafted and
received the interlocal documents.
Recommendations:
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the Interlocal Agreement
and authorize the Chairman to sign all necessary documents.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved the Interlocal Agreement with
Florida Housing Finance Corporation for Walker
Avenue Club, Ltd. Multi -Family Revenue Bonds and
authorized the Chairman to sign all necessary
documents, as recommended by staff.
AUGUST 8, 2000
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
OX 114 PG 472
-18-
0 0
•
ZL CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS TO
SHARED SERVICES ALLIANCE OF OKEECHOBEE AND THE TREASURE
COAST
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 31, 2000:
TO: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Children's Services Advisory Committee
THROUGH: Joyce Johnston -Carlson,
Director, Human Servic
DATE: Monday, July 31, 2000
SUBJECT: Shared Services Alliance of Okeechobee and the Treasure Coast"
The Children's Services Advisory Committee has approved, and submits the following names
for approval by the Indian River County Commissioners. Please place this matter on the August —
8, 2000 Agenda.
These individuals will be members of the committee named as "Shared Services Alliance of
Okeechobee and the Treasure Coast". The purpose of this committee is to oversee the
privatization of the Department of Children and Families.
The names are:
Jean Kline, Administrator
Indian River County Health Department
1900 27h Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Phone: 770-5401
Fax: 770-5403
E -Mail: Jean-KIIneQdoh.state.fl.us-com
The Honorable Paul Kanarek
Circuit Court Judge,
Indian River Courthouse
2000 16"' Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Phone -770-5052
Fax: 770-5133
E -Mail: she kg_eg0stlucieco.gov
AUGUST 8, 2000
-19-
•
BK 114 PG 473
Joyce Johnston -Carlson
Director, Human Services
Indian River County Administration
1840 25'" Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365
Phone: 561-567-8000 Ext. 422 or 524
Fax: 561-978-1798
Email: - on(abcc co Indian-river.fl.us
Beverly O'Neill
United Way Representative
9790 616` Place
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Phone: 561-388-5714
Fax: 561-388-5996
E -Mail: beverly@sunet.ri
Dorothy Talbert
2000 Pine Creek Blvd.
Vero Beach, Florida 32966
Phone- 561-562-3902
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved the Children's Services
Advisory Committee appointments to the Shared
Services Alliance of Okeechobee and the Treasure
Coast Committee, as follows: Jean Kline, Honorable
Paul Kanarek, Joyce Johnston -Carson, Beverly
O'Neill and Dorothy Talbert.
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 474
-20-
7.1 LIBRARIES- CHILDREN'S GRANT CONTRACTS - TLCNEwBoRN5 -
FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY - FLORIDA DIVISION OF LIBRARIES AND
INFORMATION SERVICES (`BORN TO READ" GRANT FOR PROJECT TO
BE KNOWNAS "FANTASTIC PARENTS/AMAZING KIDS")
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 27, 2000:
DATE: July 27, 2000
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRU: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director .-fLa vJ• �°`Ot'�
FROM: Mary Powell, Library Services Director" —
SUBJECT: Children's Grant Contracts
BACKGROUND:
The Children's Librarian applied to the Division of Library and Information Services
seeking a `Born to Read" giant, which targets newborns and their parents. They have
awarded the project $6,754.00. This project is in cooperation with TLC (Touch, Love,
Communicate) Newborns, a division of the Indian River County Health Department, and
will offer quality, educational programs to new mothers of various ages and socio-
economic backgrounds. The emphasis of the project is on teen parents.
ANALYSIS:
Friends of the Library will provide $500.00 of the required $2,251.00 match. The
remaining $1,751.00 will come from the existing salary of the Children's Librarian Patti
Fuchs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrespectfully requests that the Board authorize its Chairman to sign the contracts and
return to the Library Services Director to be forwarded to the appropriate state library
staff.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-21-
BK 1 1 4 PG 475
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved the Library Services and
Technology Act Grant Agreement with the State of
Florida, Department of State, Division of Library
and Information Services for the project to be known
as "Fantastic Parents/Amazing Kids" under the
LSTA "Born to Read" Grant Proposal, as
recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.K 43RD AVENUE WIDENING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CARTER
ASSOCIATES, ING - FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE OF RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 31, 2000:
auGusT s, 2000 gK 1 1 4 PG 416
•
-22- 0
i
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
i
Terry B. Thompson, P.EC
Capital Projects Manager
FROM: G. Sean McGuire, P.E.�-'"
Project Engineer
SUBJECT: 43'd Avenue Widening and Drainage Improvements
Project No. 9601
Carter Associates, Inc., Professional Services
Final Payment and Release of Retainage
DATE: July 31, 2000
Carter Associates, Inc. has requested, and is entitled, to Final
Payment and 100% Release of Retainage for their services on
Addendum #4 for this project.
Additional services required to address remaining offsite drainage
issues will be included in a future addendum.
Approve Final Payment and 100% Release of Retainage for Addendum #4
in the amount of $9,875.58. Funding from Account 101-155-541-
067.47.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously, approved final payment and 100%
release of retainage to Carter Associates, Inc., as
recommended by staff.
AUGUST 8, 2000
INVOICE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-23-
8K 114 PG 477
•
7.L. KNK VENTURES, INC. - FINAL PDIPLAT PLANAPPROVAL FOR A
COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWNAS KNK
VENTURES SUBDIVISION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 1, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D)jYfSTN HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP /
Community Development Directo
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
— Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP /��„�►�
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 1, 2000
SUBJECT: KNK Ventures, Inc.'s Request for Final PD Plat/Plan Approval for a
Commercial Planned Development to be Known as KNK Ventures Subdivision
It is requested that the information provided herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its meeting of August 8, 2000.
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS:
The KNK Ventures subdivision is a plat of a 4.64 acre parcel located on the north side of SR 60 just
east of the Citrus Ridge Post Office. The plat will establish a commercial development tract, a
stormwater management tract, and an access easement. Construction of the commercial buildings
(fuel sales, car wash, office building, and a mini storage facility) was approved through the
preliminary PD process. As a PD, the site must be platted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy (C.O.) for any portion of the project.
AUGUST 8, 2000
K114PG47�
-24-
C:
On January 8, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plat/plan
approval to construct the fuel sales, carwash, office building, and mini storage facility. The applicant
subsequently obtained site plan release and commenced construction of the improvements. The
owner KNK Ventures, Inc., through its agent, Mosby & Associates. Inc., is now requesting final
plat/plan approval and has submitted the following:
1. A PD final plat/plan in conformance with the approved preliminary PD plat/plan.
ANALYSIS:
All required improvements necessary to serve the buildings have been approved and are controlled
through the preliminary PD plat/plan process. All required improvements will be provided by the
developer prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building . All applicable
requirements regarding final PD platiplan approval have been met. There are no publically dedicated
improvements to be constructed as part of this plat. Therefore, no guarantees of publically dedicated
improvements are required at this time. Please note that the County Attorney's Office does have
minor, non -substantial changes to the plat, which will require an updated graphic (attachment #3)
for the record.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
approval for the KNK Ventures final PD.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously, granted final approval for the KNK
Ventures final PD/Plat, as recommended by staff.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-25-
Bk 114 PG 479
•
ZM. DENNIS GENTILE - RETIREMENT A WARD AND PROCLAMATION UPON
RETIREMENT FFROMINDIANRIVER COUNTY
The following were entered into the record:
AUGUST 8, 2000
-26-
•
PROCLAMATION
HONORING DENNIS GENTILE
ON HIS RETIREMENT
EFFECTIVE AUGUST 10, 2000
WHEREAS, DENNIS GENTILE began employment with Indian River County on May
12,1980, as an Engineering Technician after completing course work in mathematics, land
surveying and construction technology at New York University in Farmingdale, New York;
and
WHEREAS, his supervisors quickly recognized his versatile talents in applying
engineering principles to field construction, and on January 27, 1982, Dennis was promoted
to Assistant Superintendent of the Road and Bridge Division; and
WHEREAS, on July 28, 1993, Dennis became a Certified Florida DOPT Bridge
Inspector, an accomplishment that only 216 individuals had held in the State of Florida at
that time; and
WHEREAS, for eleven years his supervisor, Albert VanAuken, highly acclaimed
Dennis Gentile's accomplishments; and
WHEREAS, when Albert retired, Dennis became Acting Superintendent -and
efficiently managed the 90 member Division, which resulted in a letter of appreciation from
the Risk Manager for an excellent safety record. Dennis has always received excellent
evaluations from Terry Cook, his current superintendent; and
WHEREAS, Dennis has been a valuable employee to Indian River County for over
20 years, and his talent and jovial personality will be sorely missed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board extends to
DENNIS GENTILE thanks for a job well done.
Adopted this 8t' day of August, 2000.
AUGUST 8, 2000
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
-27-
•
8.A. SHERIFF - COPS MORE 98 RENEWAL. #1999CMWX1815 -
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
The Board reviewed a letter of August 1, 2000:
��jerif f �•
GARY C. WHEELER - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
..7= .CG=L.O RICl r SHEP-5 ASSZC;A- Ct•.
=VEE= NATIONAL 51E---5 ASSCC.ATiON
405541st AVENUE VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE 1561; 569-6700
August 1, 2000
The Honorable Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
RE: COPS MORE 98 RENEWAL #1999CMWX1815
Dear Chairman Adams:
The COPS MORE 98 Renewal request has been granted by the Department of Justice for an
additional year of funding at the rate of $87,720. As you may recall, this grant helps to defer part
of the salaries of four (4) civilian positions that replaced previously held sworn officer positions
in the Courthouse and the Civil Unit within the Sheriff's Office allowing the sworn officers to be
redeployed to the Uniform Operations Division.
The attached acceptance document must be signed by both the Sheriff and the Chairman of the
Board of County Commissioners. Therefore, I would ask that you place the acceptance of this
grant on your agenda for the August 8, 2000, Board meeting.
Should you have any additional questions concerning the grant, feel free to contact me or our
grant coordinator, Sandy Shields at 978-6254.
Sincerely,
Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff
AUGUST 8, 2000
on i14 PG 402
-28-
0 0
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved the COPS MORE 98 Award
Renewal, #1999CMWX1815, as requested.
RENEWAL APPLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
8.B. SHERIFF - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR OUT -OF -COUNTY
INMATE REVENUE - APRIL. 2000
The Board reviewed a letter of August 1, 2000:
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLOAIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
405541st AVENUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 3296o-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700
August 1, 2000
The Honorable Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
Re: Budget Adjustment, Out -Of -County Inmate Revenue
Dear Chairman Adams:
This letter is a request to amend our fiscal year 1999-2000 Operating Budget. In the month of April.
2000. we generated prisoner revenue totaling $91230, detailed below:
AUGUST 8, 2000 11" 1 1 4 PG 4 8 3
UA
-29-
L
U.S. Marshal - 916 inmate days at $60.00 per day $ 54,960
Charlotte County - 330 inmate days at $45.00 per day 14,850
I.N.S.- 357 inmates at $60.00 per day 21.420
Total Revenue $ 91,230
The $54,960, when received from the U.S. Marshal's office, will be forwarded to you for deposit into the
County's General Fund.
We are asking to amend our budget by the $36.270 received from Charlotte County and the Immigration
and Naturalization Service. The first $15.00 of each inmate day will be used to offset the expense of
housing the prisoners. This represents $10,305 for the month of April. These monies will be distributed
as follows:
Corrections Operating Supplies
Total Corrections
$10,305
$ 10,305
The balance of the revenue, or $25,965, will be used to fund the Aviation Component as agreed during
the Budget Hearings in September of last year. These monies will be distributed as follows:
Aviation Salaries $ 22,918
Aviation Capital (Pilot Helmets) 3.047
Total Aviation Component $ 25,965
I am requesting this item be placed on the Agenda at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or any further information is required, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Gary Ze'ler, Sheriff
ON MOTION
by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously amended the Sheriff's 1999-2000
Operating Budget to reflect $54,960 received from
the U.S. Marshal (to be deposited into the County's
General Fund); $14,850 received from Charlotte
County and $21,420 received from Immigration and
Naturalization Service ($10,305 to offset the expense
of housing prisoners and $25,965 to fund the
Aviation Component), as requested. _
AUGUST 8, 2000 nit I 1 � pG 4 8 4
• -30- •
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - WINDSOR PROPERTIES -
CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN MODIFICATION AND
EXPANSION (Legislate
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 26, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D S ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Or 9
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Developmen Directo
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP �� ��
Senior Planner, Current evelopment
DATE: July 26, 2000
SUBJECT: Windsor Properties' Request for Conceptual PD Plan Modification and
Expansion
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 8, 2000.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for approval to modify the
Windsor conceptual PD plan. No increase in the density or total number of units is proposed by
adding new property to the overall project site.
The applicant is proposing to add 3.95 acres of multi -family zoned property to the overall Windsor
planned development project and add a PD waiver request. The "expansion" property consists of
an existing 3 lot subdivision known and platted as the Ocean Bluff subdivision. This expansion
property is located on the east side of SR A -1-A just south of the existing Windsor development.
AUGUST 8, 2000
BK 114PG45
-31-
Please see attachment #2. The expansion parcel will be added to an existing Windsor 19.98 acre
oceanfront parcel to form a 23.93 acre Windsor oceanfront parcel. The proposed modified
conceptual PD plan proposes single-family units on the entire 23.93 acre parcel, which is within the
RM -3 (Residential Multi -Family District up to 3 units per acre) zoning district.
• Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of July 13, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
(7-0) to recommend approval of the addition of the property to the project and the additional waiver.
ANALYSIS:
1. Zoning Classifications: RS -3, Residential Single Family District (up to 3 units per acre),
and RM -3, Residential Multi -Family District (up to 3 units per acre).
2. Land Use Designation: L-1, Low Density Residential (up to 3 units per acre)
3. Overall Windsor Project Size: Existing Conceptual Plan: 415.55 acres
Proposed Addition: 3.95 acres
Tom: 419.50 acres
4. Units/Density: Approved: 400 units at a density of 0.96 units/acre
Proposed: 400 units at a density of 0.95 units/acre
The project's highest density is located within Windsor's "village" area. The total number
of overall Windsor project units (400 units) will not change if this application is approved.
The density will drop slightly due to the additional land area.
5. Utilities: The existing development is served by public water and wastewater, and will
continue to be served by these facilities. Utility Services has no objection to approval of the
proposed modifications. The utility lines which serve the expansion area will be connected
with the utility system that currently serves Windsor and will be looped back to the utility
lines in the SR A -1-A right-of-way.
6. Traffic Circulation: The overall traffic circulation plan will remain the same. The traffic
engineering department has reviewed and approved the overall internal traffic circulation
system. The existing S.R. A -1-A entry in the expansion area will be closed, and the lots will
be accessed through an extension of an existing internal local road within Windsor that runs
parallel to S.R. A -1-A.
7. Parking: All residential units at Windsor will be designed to accommodate two or more
vehicles either in garages or within other private parking areas. Therefore, county parking
requirements are accommodated and will be satisfied.
8. Stormwater Management: The overall conceptual stormwater management plan will
remain the same, and the proposed PD modifications will not alter or adversely affect
Windsor's master stormwater system, which can accommodate the proposed 3.95 acre
addition. Public Works has no objections to approval of the proposed PD modification and
integration of the "Ocean Bluff stormwater system" into Windsor's master system. -
auGusT s, z000 BK 114 PG 486
• -32- 0
C
9. Environmental Issues: There are no unaddressed environmental issues related to this
proposal. All environmental issues were addressed with the Ocean Bluff Subdivision
approval and previous Windsor conceptual PD plan approval conditions. Those conditions,
which include sea turtle lighting and upland conservation easements, will remain in effect
for the original site and the 3.95 acre addition.
10. Required Improvements: Given the project's location, the following improvements are
required:
A 5' wide sidewalk on the east side of SR A -1-A. As allowed by the LDRs, the
developer has chosen in the past to bond -out this improvement in segments along
with the preliminary PD approvals for development phases on the east side of SR A-
1 -A.
An 8' wide bike path on the west side of SR A -1-A. This improvement was
addressed by Windsor via a previous developers agreement.
Thus, the developer is complying with all county sidewalk and bikeway requirements.
11. New and Modified Design Waivers: By incorporating the expansion area into the PD, the
planned development waivers for the Windsor project will control development of this area.
The lot size and setback minimums applicable to the expansion area will be the same as the
standards applicable to Windsor's existing oceanfront lots, which are: a 1,000 sq. ftp
minimum lot size and a 0' setback on the front, rear, and sides. The setback from the ocean
is a function of DEP permitting if any construction is proposed seaward of the CCCL.
The applicant is requesting that an additional planned development waiver be granted with
the modified conceptual plan. The proposed waiver would allow for building eaves to
overhang (encroach) over the adjacent residential lots up to 3 & 1/2'. This is a common
feature in zero lot line developments; most of Windsor is approved as a zero lot line
development. The new waiver would apply only where zero lot line homes could be built.
The applicant has owner documents making provisions for maintenance access for such
strictures that need to be maintained by accessing the neighboring lot.
12. Conceptual Plan Changes: The only conceptual plan changes proposed are the addition of
the 3.95 acre Ocean Bluff subdivision into the overall Windsor project and the modifications
necessary to connect the expansion area infrastructure into Windsor's infrastructure along
with the above reference PD waiver. The existing subdivision will be replatted as part of the
Windsor development. There are two existing homes in the subdivision. The northern one
will be removed, while the southern house will remain. A total of 3 lots will comprise the
expansion area, and there will be no increase in the overall number of units within Windsor.
The total number of units will remain at 400.
nuGusT s, 2000 BK 114 PG 487
-33-
0
13. Landscape & Buffering: A Type 'B" buffer will be constructed along the new south
property line of the overall Windsor oceanfront parcel, which is the southern edge of the
expansion parcel. This southern edge abuts an undeveloped portion of Golden Sands Park
(a county oceanfront park).
14. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning of Expansion Area:
North: Windsor Oceanfront Single-families/RM-3
South: Vacant Parcel, Golden Sands Park/RM-3
East: Atlantic Ocean/N/A
West: S.R. A -1-A Windsor Golf Course/RS-3
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception PD approval for the
proposed modifications to the overall Windsor PD.
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project which extends the south boundary
of Windsor. The project adds 3 lots to the total acreage but reduces the density by 3 units.
There is also a waiver to the internal part of the project to allow roof eaves to overhang into
the adjoining properties.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously granted special exception PD approval
for the proposed modifications to the overall
Windsor PD, as recommended by staff. _
nucusT s, 2000 BK 0 14 PG 488
-34- 0
•
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ST. MARKS A.E.C.. INC. - SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A
PLACE OF WORSHIP (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 1, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIV ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
7 �
l o rt M. reating,
CP
Community Development Direc
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Jeff Blackstone 1
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 1, 2000
SUBJECT: St. Marks A.E.C., Inc.'s Request for Special Exception Use Approval to
Construct a Place of Worship
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 8, 2000.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Todd Smith, on behalf of St. Mark's Anglican A.E.C.. Inc., has submitted an application for special
exception use approval to construct a place of worship to be known as the Church of the Advent.
The subject site is located at 1180 8th Street, approximately 3/10 of a mile west of Old Dixie
Highway on the north side of 8th Street. The applicant is proposing a 2,400 sq. ft. church building
and associated improvements to be constructed in one phase. No school or child care uses are
proposed on site. Since the site is located within a single-family residential (RS -6) zoning district,
special exception use approval must be granted by the county for use of the site as a place of
worship. A place of worship was previously approved on this site, but the approval expired with no
construction.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-35-
Eki14PG489
•
• Board of County Commissioners Consideration
The Board of County Commissioners is to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the special
exception use request. Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board of County Commissioners
is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and surrounding area. The
county may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure
compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
• planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of July 13, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the special exception'use with the
condition that staff re-evaluate the design of the recreation path along the north side of 8" Street.
Planning staff has coordinated with Traffic Engineering staff and concluded that the existing design
remains the safest alternative. Staff has not included this condition in the recommendation that
appears at the end of this report. At its July 13' meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission also
approved the request for major site plan approval contingent on the Board of County Commissioners
approving the special exception use.
ANALYSIS:
Zoning ning Classification: RS -6, Residential Single Family (up to 6 units per acre)
2. Land Use Designation: L-2, Low Density (up to 6 units per acre)
3. Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
North: Single Family Residences/RS-6
South: 8th Street, Residences/RS-6
East: Vacant, (Chase Meadows SD)/RS-6
West: Commercial, Vacant/CH. RS -6
4. Total Area of Development: 114,840 sq. ft. or 2.64 acres
5. Building Area: 2,400 sq. ft.
6. Impervious Surface: 10,609 sq. ft. (an additional 12.958 sq. ft. of semi -
impervious surface is proposed)
7. Semi -Impervious Surface: 12,958 sq. ft. (stabilized parking area)
8. Open Space: Required: 40.0%
Proposed: 79.5%
9. Traffic Circulation: The site will be accessed by a full movement, two-way driveway
connection to 811 Street. This paved driveway connection to 8' Street will connect to a one-
way circular drive that accesses a drop-off area on the south side (front) of the building. A
one-way drive will continue around the east side of the building to provide access to parking
spaces along the rear of the building and connect with a two-way driving aisle. An additional
two-way stabilized driveway extends to the west of the paved circular drive along the west
property line to provide access to stabilized parking spaces located to the west of the
proposed church. The proposed traffic circulation plan and project traffic impact statement
have been approved by the Traffic Engineering Department. No off-siie traffic
improvements are required in conjunction with this development, and none are proposed.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-36- 0
•
10. Off -Street Parking: Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 954 for off-street parking, the
site is required to provide parking at a ratio of one parking space for every 3 seats.
X
Required: 20 spaces (60 seats proposed)
Provided: 35 spaces (4 handicap, 2 compact, 1 standard, and 28 stabilized/grassed)
Note: Infrequent uses such as churches can use grassed spaces.
11. Stormwater Management: The preliminary stormwater management plan has been
approved by the Public Works Department. Pursuant to Chapter 930 of the land
development regulations (LDRs), a county Type "A" stormwater management permit will
be required prior to site plan release.
12. Utilities: The project will be connected to county water and sewer services. These utility
provisions have been approved by both the Utility Services Department and the
Environmental Health Department.
13. Environmental Issues: No uplands preservation or wetlands requirements apply.
Environmental planning staff has no objection to approval of the site plan.
14. Landscape Plan: The landscaping plan is in accordance with Chapter 926 requirements and
provides the buffers required for places of worship. Since the property is adjacent to single-
family residences, a Type "C" buffer is required along the east property line where the site
abuts single-family residential zoning. A Type "D" buffer is required along the north and
west property lines where the site abuts multi -family residential zoning. The specific land
use criteria related to places of worship do not require that opaque features be provided in
association with these buffers. No opaque features have been proposed.
15. Dedications and Improvements:
Sidewalks: In accordance with the county's sidewalk and bikeway plan and the
LDRs, the site plan depicts an 8' wide sidewaWrecreation path along the site's 8th
Street frontage. Prior to issuance of a C.O. for the project, the applicant will be
required to construct or contract and bond -out for the construction of the subject
sidewalk segment. Planning staff has re-evaluated the proposed design of the
recreation path with Traffic Engineering, as requested by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Traffic Engineering staff has indicated that the proposed design of the
path is the safest design because it encourages people using the recreation path to
cross in front of the stop bar and stop sign, where they will be more visible to traffic
entering or leaving the church property.
8'' Street Right -of -Way: The county previously obtained the ultimate right-of-way
width of 80' for 8`" Street in this location. No additional right-of-way is necessary in
this location.
16. Spec Land Use Criteria: The application must satisfy all applicable criteria for a place
of worship. The place of worship specific land use criteria are as follows:
a. No building or structure shall be located closer than thirty (30) feet to any property
line abutting a residential use or residentially designated property;
Note. The proposed church is 30' from the east property line, the closest property line.
AUGUST 8, 2000 , � �
-37-
PG 4 9 I
•
b. Access shall be from a major thoroughfare unless otherwise approved by the public
works department;
Note: 8" Street at this location is classified as a collector roadway by the county
Thoroughfare Plan map.
C. Any accessory residential use, day care facility or school upon the premises shall
provide such additional lot area as required for such use by this section and shall
further be subject to all conditions set forth by the reviewing procedures and
standards for that particular use. Accessory residential uses may include covenants,
monasteries, rectories or parsonages as required by these regulations;
Note. No accessory uses are being proposed with this application.
d. Type "C" screening shall be provided along all property boundaries where the facility
is located adjacent to a single-family residentially designated property. Type "D"
screening shall be provided along all property boundaries when the facility is located
adjacent to a multi -family residential designated property.
Note: Type "C" screening has been provided along the east property line and Type
"D" screening has been provided along the north and west development boundaries.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis performed, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval for the proposed place of
worship.
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project for the Board.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously granted special exception use approval
for the proposed place of worship, as recommended
by staff. _
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK 114 PG 4 9 Z
-38-
• 0
•
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - SBA TOWERS, INC. - SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 300 -
FOOT TALL MULTI -TENANT COMMUNICATIONS
TOWER NORTH OF FELLSMERE AT 14195122
STREET (OLIVER J. AND BARBARA CREWS))(Quasi-
Judicial
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 17, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Direct
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: July 17, 2000
SUBJECT: SBA Towers Inc.'s Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Construct a
300 Foot Tall Multi -tenant Communications Tower North of Fellsmere at 14195
122nd Street
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 8, 2000.
BACKGROUND:
In 1996 and 1997, the county held several workshops regarding communication tower regulations
and, in 1997, comprehensively revised its tower regulations. Since that time, several existing towers
have been re -built and converted into multiple tenant towers under the revised regulations, and many
AUGUST 8, 2000
-39-
BK 114 PG 493
•
antenna attachments have been co -located on existing tall structures. Thus, the revised regulations
appear to be directing most new communications antenna needs to existing and re -built structures,
as intended by the revised regulations.
However, as anticipated, some new tower facilities have been and are being applied for under the
revised regulations. One such "new" tower was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
on December 11. 1997. That tower was approved as a 150' tall multiple tenant lattice tower on a site
located between I-95 and 82ad Avenue ±2.7 miles south of CR 510. That location is more than 2
miles away from any pre-existing tall structure. One other approved new tower is a 149' tall
monopole multi-user tower located near the east end of 69' Street, west of the Indian River Lagoon.
That tower was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its July 13, 2000 meeting.
Another application now under consideration is the subject application for a 300' tall tower to be
located west of CR 507 near the Indian River County/Brevard County line. The impetus for the
application is an antenna needed for FM 95.9, a recently licensed FM station restricted to a broadcast
location generally north of Fellsmere.
Proposed Development
SBA towers, Inc., a tower company that owns and leases space on towers, is requesting special
exception use and minor site plan approval to construct a 300' tall multiple tenant lattice tower and
associated equipment building compound area. The initial tenant for the tower is a new FM radio
station. The subject site is located approximately 0.8 miles west of CR 507 and 0.2 miles south of
the C-54 Canal, at 14195 122' Street, and is zoned A-2 (Agricultural). Towers over 150' tall are
allowed in the A-2 district (as well as the A-3, CON -1, IL, and IG districts) as special exception uses.
Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its July 13, 2000 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners grant special exception approval with the conditions contained in
the recommendation at the end of this report (see attachment #6).
At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to approve, approve with conditions, or deny
the special exception use request. Pursuant to section 971.05 of the land development regulations
(LDRs), the Board is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and
surrounding area. The Board may attach any reasonable conditions and safeguards necessary to
mitigate impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
1. Zoning Classification: A-2, Agricultural (up to 1 unit per 10 acres)
2. Land Use Designation: AG -2, Agricultural 2 (up to 1 unit per 10 acres)
Note. The site is located approximately 4.7 miles outside the Urban Service Area and 3 miles
from the Fellsmere city limits.
3. Overall Area of Subject Property: 76 acres
Note. Subject property is held under the names of Oliver J. and Barbara Crews,
4, Area of Development:
AUGUST 8, 2000
22,691 sq. ft. or 0.52 acres
5. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
-Norte: Vacant, Agriculture, C-54 Canal/A-2
South: Vacant, Agriculture, Citrus Groves/A-2
East: Vacant, Agriculture, Residences*/A-2
West: Citrus Groves/A-2
*Note: The property owner (Crews) residence is located approximately 2.075' east of the
tower site. The closest "off-site" residence is approximately 2,500 feet east-northeast of the
tower site.
6. Airport Zoning Ordinance Regulations: Because the proposed tower is more than 200' tall.
it extends into the county's height notification zone. In accordance with height notification
zone regulations, the applicant has already notified the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) of the tower proposal and has obtained an FAA permit for the proposed tower (see
attachment #4). Although the FAA permit allows construction of a tower 315' above ground
level on the site, the special exception request limits the tower height to 300' above ground
level. Staff has determined that the proposal complies with the county's airport zoning
ordinance requirements.
7. Tower: 300' tall, above ground level; lattice -type, self-supporting tower designed for
multiple users; to be lighted and marked in accordance with FAA requirements.
8. Compound Area: A 180'x 80' fenced and gated compound area is proposed around the
tower. The compound area will have a gravel surface and will accommodate maintenance
vehicles visiting the site and equipment shelters/buildings associated with various tower
users. Fencing will consist of 8' chain-link with 3 -strands of barbed wire. Landscaping will
be provided along the exterior perimeter of the fence. —
9. Traffic Circulation: The tower will be accessed from CR 507 via 122ad Street, an unpaved
roadway which serves the property owner's (Crews) existing house at 14195 122" Street.
The proposed tower facility will be unmanned and is a low traffic generator. Under county
traffic and parking regulations, the access road may remain unpaved, as proposed. Traffic
Engineering has approved the proposed traffic circulation.
10. Off -Street Parking: Required: 1 space (unpaved)
Provided: 1 space (unpaved)
Note: County off-street parking regulations for towers require one (1) parking space. The
spaces may be fully sodded or otherwise stabilized as approved by the Public Works
Director. The stabilized parking spaces provided for the subject site have been approved by
the Public Works Director.
11. Stormwater Management: The Stormwater Management Plan, which includes a berm
around the development area, has been approved by the Public Works Department.
12. Utilities: Given the type of use, no water or wastewater services are required. Therefore,
county utilities has no objection to approval of the site plan and use approval.
13. Health & Rehabilitative Services (HRS): The HRS Environmental Health Unit
acknowledges that the site will not require a potable water supply or sanitary facility, and has
no objections to approval of the site plan and use approval.
AUGUST 8, 2000 114
PG
-41-
14. Specific Land Use Criteria: The applicant must satisfy the following specific land use
criteria which apply to the erection of towers 150' and taller.
(g) The following criteria must be used for administrative permit and special exception
uses, as previously specified:
1. All towers not related to amateur radio con m mications use and not
constituting a camouflaged commercial communications tower" shall have
setbacks from all property lines or boundaries of development sites (areas of
development) involving more than one property equal to one hundred (100)
feet or one hundred (100) percent of the tower height, whichever is greater.
In addition, the application shall demonstrate that the tower is to be located
a distance more than equal to three hundred (300) percent of the tower height
from the nearest residential dwelling (existing or under construction). Said
distance shall be measured from the closest point of the tower structure to the
closest point of the dwelling.
Towers constituting a camouflaged commercial communications tower"
need satisfy only the building setbacks for the type of structure used or
simulated.
Note: The proposed tower is set back 300'(100% of the tower's height) from
the nearest property line and 2.075' (692% of the tower's height) from the
nearest principal residence (the residence of the owner of the subject
property).
Setbacks are as follows:
a. To north property line:
300'
b. To south property line:
302'
C. To west property line:
382'
d. To east property line:
584'
e. To nearest off-site residence:
2,500'
f. To CR 507:
5,000'
2. Towers shall be designed and constructed according to applicable building
code wind -loading requirements.
Note: This requirement is applied at the time of building permit review.
3. The distance of any guy anchorage or similar device shall be at least five (5)
feet from any property line.
Note: Not applicable (no guys proposed).
4. All accessory structures shall be subject to the height restrictions provided in
Accessory uses, Chapter 917. Accessory buildings and shelters shall meet the
requirements of section 917.06(8)(D).
AUGUST 8, 2000
Note. All proposed accessory structures will be less than 15' tall; with earth
tone colors.
-42- 0
5. If more than two hundred twenty (220) voltage is necessary for the operation
of the facility and is present in a ground grid or in the tower, signs located
every twenty (20) feet and attached to the fence or wall shall display in large,
bold, high contrast letters (minimum height of each letter. four (4) inches) the
following: "HIGH VOLTAGE - DANGER."
Note. This requirement is applied at the time of building permit review if and
when 220 voltage is applied for.
6. No equipment, mobile or immobile, which is not used in direct support of the
transmission or relay facility shall be stored or parked on the tower site area
of development unless repairs to the facility are being made (applies only on
A-1, A-2, or A-3 zoned property).
Note: No such outdoor equipment is proposed.
7. No tower shall be permitted to encroach into or through any established
public or private airport approach path as provided in the airport height
limitations. All proposed towers shall satisfy the airport zoning ordinance
requirements.
Note: As previously noted, an FAA permit has been obtained and the
proposal complies with the airport zoning ordinance requirements.
8. Suitable protective anti -climb fencing (e.g. eight -foot fencing with barbed
wire) and a landscape planting screening shall be provided and maintained
around the structure and accessory attachments. One canopy tree (minimum _
height of twelve (12) feet with six-foot spread at time of planting) and two (2)
understory trees (minimum height of eight (8) feet at time of planting) shall
be provided for every thirty (30) feet of the tower base/accessory structures'
fenced perimeter. Credit shall be given for existing trees located between the
tower base perimeter and adjacent areas that are being buffered. The required
trees shall be planted in a pattern to maximize screening of the base area of
the tower from the view of adjacent road rights-of-way and adjacent
residentially designated or residentially used properties, without conflicting
with any guy wires. Trees credited or planted to meet this screening
requirement shall be located on property under the control of the applicant to
ensure that the screening trees are preserved and maintained.
Note: Fencing is proposed as 8' chain-link and an additional 1' with 3 strands
of barbed wire. Based upon action by the Planning and Zoning Commission,
the applicant has the option to use a 10' chainlink fence. The proposed
landscaping plan satisfies tower landscaping requirements by providing slash
pine and wax myrtles, with an irrigation system, around the fenced perimeter
of the area of development.
9. All towers shall submit a conceptual tower lighting plan. Louvers or shields
may be required as necessary to keep light from shining down on surrounding
properties. Where lighting is required by a government agency, dual
(day/night) lighting must be used unless otherwise directed by other agencies.
Note: Dual node day/night lighting is proposed with shielding louvers.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-43-
6K 114 PG 497
_I
10. For special exception use requests for towers in the urban service area, all
property owners within six hundred (600) feet of the property boundary shall
receive written notice via certified mail. For towers outside the urban service
area, all property owners within one-half (1h) mile of the tower site shall be
notified, as follows: certified mail to owners of property within the first six
hundred (600) feet, regular mail to the remainder.
Note. Owners of property within 1/z mile of the tower site were notified of the
Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing, and also have been notified
of the Board of County Commissioners public hearing. In addition, Brevard
county and the City of Fellsmere were sent a courtesy notice.
11. Applicants shall justify in writing why no other existing tower or other
potential collocation facility within the "accepted search area," as defined
below, could be used to meet the applicant's transmitting/receiving needs. An
application may be denied if the justification does not show the use of an
existing tower or potential collocation facility within the "accepted search
area" is not feasible. The written justification shall include the following:
(a) A scaled map showing the "acceptable search area." Said area shall
be one hundred fifty (150) percent of the search area radius of the
proposed facility, which shall be demonstrated based on radio-
frequency information (including field data) and specifications,
antenna height, terrain, and proposed telecommunications service.
Note: Provided. Acceptable search area of several square miles was
used to demonstrate FCC licensing restrictions for the client FM radio
station and FAA restrictions around the Sebastian Airport. The
search area was deemed appropriate by county telecommunications
manager Terry Smith.
(b) Said scaled map (see (a), above), shall show the location, height. and
users of the following: existing, approved, and proposed tower sites
and potential collocation sites (e.g. transmission pole corridors,
ballfield lighting facilities, steeples, water towers, silos, and other tall
structures).
Note: Provided. Tall structures within the search area and within 2
miles of the search area were identified and located. This information
was reviewed by telecommunications manager Terry Smith.
(c) A countywide map showing the general location of the applicant's
existing facilities and tentative five-year location plan for future
facilities.
Note: Information provided in the application materials. The
applicant is not a telecommunications provider and, therefore, has no
service area coverage requirements.
(d) For each existing, approved, and proposed facility mapped under (b),
above, a written explanation of why such facility cannot be used. CE
Justifiable reasons may include owner rejection. Reasons given that
AUGUST 89 2000 BK 114 PG 4 9 8
-aa-
involve tnaoequate height, inadequate space or structural capacity and
radio-frequency interference shall include an explanation of why
-' structural modifications that could overcome such problems are not
feasible. any such reasons shall be reviewed by a county engineering
consultant, as referenced in (e) and (f) below.
Note: Provided, and reviewed by telecommunications manager Terry
Smith. The FCC will not move its defined broadcast location area 1
to 2 miles south to allow use of existing ±300' towers located
southwest of Fellsmere. Also, the existing ±200' tall AT&T tower
located along CR 507, which is located 4,954' from the proposed
tower, cannot be re -built to a taller height and meet county
regulations. Furthermore, the AT&T tower is shorter than needed for
the FM broadcast use and the top portions of the tower are already
occupied by existing facilities (e.g. dishes).
Conclusion: Existing towers in the area cannot be used for the FM
broadcast use due to regulatory and technical reasons.
(e) Submittal of a fee established by resolution of the board of county
commissioners, separate from site plan and special exception review
fees, to cover the county's costs of hiring an engineering consultant
to review the written justification, where a county consultant review
is required under subsection (d), above.
Note: Not applicable, because the county's Telecommunications _
Manager reviewed the justification and coordinated with the FCC and
applicant regarding the justification. Thus, the technical review has
been accomplished in-house. See Mr. Smith's comment letter,
(attachment #5).
(f) Within ten (10) working days of receiving a written justification that
requires county consultant review, the county's engineering consultant
shall submit to county staff written comments regarding the
applicant's justification and reasons.
Note: See (e) above, and Telecommunications Manager Tent'
Smith's comment memo (attachment #5).
(g) Applicants shall provide notice of the proposed tower to potential
users.
(a) * At least forty-five (45) days prior to planning and zoning
commission consideration of an application, the applicant
shall send a notice by certified mail to all known potential
tower uses, as specified by the planning division. Said notice
shall provide tower technical specifications, location, height.
and an invitation to respond within twenty (20) days to both
the applicant and planning division if cause of the tower is
desired. Said notice shall also include the phone number,
AUGUST 8, 2000 Ou 1 14 PG
-45- 9
facsimile number, and address of the applicant's contact
Person and the planning division. Respondents shall provide
the applicant and the planning division with the name and
Phone number of a contact person who has authority to
negotiate co -location arrangements. "Technical tower
specification" shall include the following:
• Structural capacity characteristics of the tower
• Output frequency and modulation characteristics of all
proposed users
• Manufacturer, type, model number, radiation diagram,
and manufacturers specifications of all proposed
antennas
0 Site elevation and antenna height range (maximum
and minimum heights above ground level)
• A list of proposed accessory buildings and available
equipment space on-site or within proposed buildings
(b) Within fifteen (15) days of receiving a timely response from
an interested potential co -user, the applicant shall inform the
respondent and the planning division in writing as to whether
_ or not the co -use is acceptable and under what conditions. If
the cause is not acceptable, then the applicant must provide
the respondent and the planning division written justification
as to why the cause is not feasible.
Note: The applicant's business is to lease tower space and is not in
competition with any telecommunications provider. The applicant has
contacted potential users (customers) as well as the owner/user of the closest
tower (AT&T).
(h) Towers shall be designed to accommodate multiple users, as follows:
Lattice towers shall be engineered and constructed to
accommodate a minimum of three (3) users.
• Monopole towers may be engineered and constructed to
accommodate a single user.
• Camouflaged towers may be engineered and constructed to
accommodate a single user.
Note: The proposed tower is designed to accommodate more than 3 users.
(i) A condition of approval for any tower application shall be that the
tower shall be available, at market rate costs, for other parties and
interests. This shall be acknowledged in a written agreement between
the applicant and the county, on a form acceptable to the county, that
AUGUST 8, 2000
-46- ox 114 PG 501
40 - 0
0
will run with the land. Said notice shall be recorded in the Indian
River County public records, at the applicant's expense.
Note: The applicant is willing to enter into such an agreement. A condition
of approval is needed to ensure that the agreement on market rate
leasing is executed prior to site plan release.
(j) If the use of a non -camouflaged tower is abandoned for more than
twelve (12) consecutive months, then the tower shall be dismantled
and removed from the site.
(a) Prior to release of an approved tower site plan, the property
owner shall acknowledge in writing, in a manner acceptable
to the county attorney's office, his or her responsibilities as
the property owner to perform or contract to perform and pay
all costs associated with dismantling and properly removing
and disposing of an abandoned tower.
Note. The applicant is willing to agree to pay all costs associated with
removing and disposing of the tower if it is abandoned for more than
12 consecutive months. A condition of approval is needed to ensure
that the removal and disposal agreement is executed prior to site plan
release.
(k) Except where superseded by applicable state or federal regulations,
non -camouflaged towers shall be painted or constructed in neutral
color (e.g. non -contrasting gray or blue) to blend into the surrounding
environment.
Note: The tower will be constructed of a standard, non -contrasting steel
gray material.
(1) Except for the exemptions cited below, non -camouflaged towers over
one hundred fifty (150) feet tall shall be separated as follows:
a. Proposed lattice towers over one hundred fifty (150) feet in
height shall be separated a distance of at least five thousand
(5,000) feet from existing or approved lattice towers over one
hundred fifty (150) feet in height. and at least one thousand
five hundred (1,500) feet from existing or approved non -
lattice towers (over one hundred fifty (150) feet in height).
b. Proposed non -lattice towers over one hundred fifty (150) feet
in height shall be separated a distance of at least one thousand
five hundred (1,500) feet from existing and approved non -
camouflaged towers over one hundred fifty (150) feet in
height.
AUGUST 8, 2000
on I 14 PG 501
r
0
Exemptions.
Tower applications shall be exempt from the separation
distance requirements specified above, as follows:
(1) Where the tower is proposed to be located more than
two thousand five hundred (2,500) feet from any
public road and from any existing residence; or
(2) where the applicant can demonstrate that applying the
separation distance criteria to his or her application
would result in a net increase in the number of
communications towers needed.
(3) where the tower is proposed to be clustered with
another tower(s) by being located no more than two
hundred (200) feet from the tower(s) within the
cluster.
Note: The only existing tower within 5,000 feet of the proposed tower is the
AT&T guyed (non -lattice) tower located along C.R. 507. That tower
is more than 1,500 feet from the proposed tower, which satisfies the
above cited separation distance requirements.
Staff concludes that all applicable specific land use criteria for the proposed tower are
satisfied.
15. Dedications and Improvements: The LDRs do not require any dedications or
improvements connected with the proposed development.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
special exception use approval for the requested multi -tenant tower with the following conditions:
1. Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall enter into agreements with the county to:
a. Acknowledge and commit to providing tower space at market rate cost for other
parties and interests; and
b. Acknowledge and commit to removing and disposing of the tower if it is abandoned
for more than 12 consecutive months and to paying for all removal and disposal
costs.
Planning Director Stan Boling stated the application is for a new tower north of
Fellsmere and staff recommends approval with conditions. The County has only had 2
applications since the 1996 and 1997 workshops on towers. The project meets and exceeds
the buffering and setback requirements and the applicant has received it&+- AA permit.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-a8-
BK 114 PG 502
0
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Mark Little, Zoning Specialist with SBA Communications, Inc., noted that the
applicant is willing to enter into all the conditions imposed by staff.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously granted the special exception use _
approval for the requested multi -tenant tower with
the conditions that prior to site plan release, the
applicant shall enter into agreements with the
County to (a) acknowledge and commit to providing
tower space at market rate cost for other parties and
interests;
and
(b) acknowledge
and commit to
removing
and
disposing of the
tower if it is
abandoned for more than 12 consecutive months and
to paying for all removal and disposal costs; as
recommended by staff.
AUGUST 8, 2000
n2
BK 1 14 PG 503
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE REPORT ON ONE-YEAR
FOCUS ON GIFFORD COMMUNITY (REQUEST FROM
PENNY CHANDLER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) "EDDIE WOOLFORK.
CHAIRMAN OF TASK FORCE)
The Board reviewed a letter of July 7, 2000:
July 7, 2000
Commissioner Fran Adams
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25`h Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Commissioner Adams:
STSF
Indian River County
Cnamoer o) Commerce
I am requesting that the Chamber's Workforce Development Task Force be placed on the
agenda for the August 9, 2000 County Commission meeting. The Task Force has completed a
one-year focus on the Gifford community and would like to report their findings to all of you. Mr.
Freddie Woolfork, who served as Task Force Chairman, will make that report.
Thank you for your consideration of our request.
S' cer y,
Penny Chandler
Executive Director
Freddie Woolfork, Chairman ofthe Workforce Enhancement Task Force, introduced
the members of the Task Force and gave a brief presentation using the July 28,-2000 Report:
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK 1 14 PG 504
-50- 0
•
Indian River Count}
Chamber of Commeme �`�• -� -
^1
1j
July 28, 2000
Mr. James Chandler, County Administrator RECEIVED
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUG -z--8 2000
1840 25th Street CLERK TO THE BOARD
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Mr. Chandler.
I am pleased to report that the Workforce Enhancement Task Force, appointed
by the Indian River County Board of Commissioners, has worked long, diligent hours to
produce the enclosed report of'Findings and Recommendations.
This report will be presented to the Board at its regularly scheduled meeting,
August 8, 2000. We look forward to meeting with you and discussing the results. In
the meantime, if I may be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Freddie Woolfork, Chairman
Workforce Enhancement Task Force
Indian River County
Chamber of Commern
DATE: July 28, 2000
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Freddie Woolfork, Chairman
Workforce Enhancement Task Force
RE: Task Force Findings and Recommendations
TASK FORCE UjrMTED
On July 15, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners requested a task force of agencies who
contribute to economic development in the Gifford community be brought together by the Indian
River County Chamber of Commerce to:
1. look at distressed areas of the County;
2. identify common issues in order to avoid duplication of services;
3. create a listing of findings;
4. make recommendations back to the County Commission.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-51-
R � .
•
The purpose of this report is to provide the County Commission the findings ,of this Ad -Hoc Task
Force named the °Workforce Enhancement Task Force.- The group began meeting in August
1999 and addressed the Gifford community. They discussed items such as how to develop jobs
and careers, promoting mainstream employment opportunities, transportation, lighting and other
topics which must be included when looking at how the people, young and old alike, in this
community view themselves, their opportunities to get a job and a better job, how they live, and
how they communicate their needs and concerns within and outside the community.
REPRESENTATION
Task Force volunteer participants included:
Freddie Woolfork, Director, Gifford Youth Activities Center
Olin Bagley, Supervisor, Workforce and Employment Opportunities, Vero Beach Office
Edmund Cannon, Citizen
AJ. Harris, President, Gifford Civic Progressive League
Victor Hart, President, NAACP
John Kraczkowski, Business Services Coordinator, WorkforceDevelopment Board of the
Treasure Coast
William Mosley, Executive Director, Gifford Economic Development Council
Katie Nall, Executive Director, Indian River County Healthy Start
Julius Reason, Citizen, Entrepreneur
Jacquelyn Reason, Entrepreneur and Private Business Owner
Dr. David Sullivan, Provost, Indian River Community College
Penny Chandler, Executive Director, Indian River County Chamber of Commerce �omme��e
Mit Thomas, Economic Development Director, (former) Indian River County Chamber of
Commerce
George Haygood, Economic Development Director, Indian River County Chamber of Comme FLORIDA �
David Pearson, Habitat For Hum4nity Iry
1999
1216 21st Street • P.O.ECIC Box0NO29477 MVe o Beach, FL 329611- T D I V I S I O N
httP*//www.vero-beach.ft.us/chamber • e-mail: hamber@vem-beach.ft �Tel 561.567.3491 - u sfi1'778'3181
SUMMARY
The "Workforce Enhancement Task Force" has successfully brought together the agencies who
contribute to economic and workforce development in the Gifford community. This group of
professionals have examined basic economic development, workforce development and workforce
enhancement initiatives currently provided in the community and have identified there is little or
no duplication of services or effort within the community. On the contrary, the group found there
to be an informal awareness and collaboration among groups, and public and private agencies
who work within Gifford.
The Task Force hereby makes the recommendations contained in this report to the members of
the County Commission for their action. By addressing the issues presented in this report, the
Board of County Commissioners will send a positive message of commitment to those who are
unemployed or underemployed and to the young people who are looking to build a future in
Indian River County. Helping all of our citizens will enable them to share in the quality of life for
which Indian River County is known.
It is recommended that the County continue the efforts of this Task Force so that these identified
initiatives can be successfully achieved. In order to accomplish the tasks at hand and ,the
recommendations presented here, the Task Force identified as the number one priority to
encourage the County Commission to establish and fund an office within county government
that will be empowered by the County Commission to work with any and all public offices,
agencies, educational institutions, government officials or representatives and all private groups,
AUGUST 8, 2000
-52-
8KI14PG506
I
organizations, and individuals to coordinate and carry forth the plan of action for short-term and
long-term success of a program generated by these findings. It is the feeling of the task force that
this o fic6 can achieve success if it is staffed by someone who is intimately familiar with the
community and motivated to move the recommendations forward to implemgntation.
Although this report focuses on the Gifford community, it's recommendations can be applied to
other specific areas of the county. And, the impact of any action taken on the recommendations in
this report will positively effect our entire county.
BACKGROUND ISSUES
• The economic base of the county is historically dependent on agriculture and service
industries, resulting in high seasonal unemployment.
• The County is making efforts to balance our economic base by increasing the number of
full-time, better paying value added jobs. These jobs require higher, skill levels.
• Certain population groups within the county have not been considered part of the
mainstream labor market and consequently lack the skills necessary to advance into higher
skilled positions.
• Target minority communities have large numbers of unemployed or underemployed job
seekers. Area businesses seek employees. However, available jobs do not match available
people.
• Training and education programs are available but, for a variety of reasons, the target job
seekers are not always able to take advantage of these programs.
• Unemployment benefits have contributed to a change of attitude in the —
workforce.
• There is a negative perception of the Gifford community that deters possible employers
from locating in this area.
ISSUES IDENTIFICATION
The following special issues were identified:
• Job opportunities are needed for all population and skill groups within the county.
• All lower economic areas of the county should be addressed in any effort.
• Transportation options to and from work are a concern in some areas.
• Recognize that unemployment benefits have contributed to a change of attitude in the
workforce.
• Integrate people back into the workforce who have paid their debt to society.
• The chronically unemployed often lack basic life skills.
• Quality infant and child care may be a concern to some families (employees), and may be
essential to many prospective employees.
• Jobs paying less than S7.00/hr. to start do not motivate the chronically unemployed whose
work history has been in low paying jobs with no advancement.
• As a rule, college graduates do not return to Indian River County; future leaders leaving
the area.
ACTIONS TAKEN
• Sun= of needs: Survey of employed and unemployed conducted at two Gifford
community civic events. "Attachment r' shows a list of questions asked and the responses.
A small sample of 25 people were surveyed. More surveys must be cc mpleted to obtain a
better sample and reliable statistics.
AUGUST 8, 2000 -53-
14 PG
507
_I
"Project H.O.P.E." (Hope, Opportunity, Preparation and Employment): A Gifford
community event held on November 13, 1999 at the Gifford Youth Activities Center.
Representatives from a variety of agencies were available to provide information on
available services to improve individual economic status. John V. Burns, an expert on
entrepreneurship, provided information to people interested in starting their own
businesses.
Agencies included: SCORE (Service Corps of Retired Executives); Treasure Coast Job
Training Center, Workforce Development Board; Division of Workforce and
Employment Opportunities; Gifford Economic Development Council; Agricultural Labor
Program; Gifford Youth Activities Center, Indian River County Public Schools;
Department of Children and Families; Gifford Civic Progressive League; Indian River
Community College; Economic Opportunities Council; Indian River County Chamber of
Commerce.
Bus Tour of Gifford Community: The Workforce Enhancement Task Force spent a
morning in March touring specific locations in the Gifford area. Task Force Chairman
Freddie Woolfork directed the tour. "Attachment II."
Existing community assets were identified and are named. "_attachment III."
GENERAL FINDINGS
• The county's 20 most in -demand jobs paying a starting wage averaging $7.00 per hour
have been identified by the Workforce Development Board along with the skill sets
necessary to qualify for each of those jobs. See review of jobs and qualifications at
kjobsorg
• Federal and state grants are also available to help people upgrade to better jobs. The
Indian River Community College Vice President of Grants Programs is available to help
discuss grant opportunities.
• Funds for chronic unemployment may be available from state and federal agencies, Black
Minority Business Funds, Workforce Development Board.
• The Minority Business Enterprise Small Business Initiative is identifying minority owned
businesses in Indian River County that would be eligible for Federal and State set aside
contracts.
• Indian River Community College held a Basic Entrepreneurship Training Program in
Gifford and is willing to do more outreach.
• Manufacturers and other businesses need employees.
• Drugs, criminal records, and credit records block the efforts of the unemployed to find
jobs.
SPECIFIC FINDINGS
• Transportation: Affects the job seeker's ability to take advantage of opportunities
including training/schooling, community events, service providing agencies, child care, and
the ability to find work Community Coach currently has fixed route service to Gifford and
in some cases an informal transportation arrangement is available to workers. -
AUGUST S, 2000 BK 1 14 PG 508
-54-
• 0
• bAhgry Rmuitment: Industrial/commercial property is available within the Gifford
community. For certain businesses, a readily available workforce would be an attractive
incentive.
• Industry Initiatives: Some businesses have expressed interest in hiring the chronically
unemployed and underemployed. Those businesses would work with the Gifford Youth
Activities Center, Career One Stop Center, WAGES Program, Indian River Community
College and other service providers.
•Child Care: Available, affordable day care is critical. Gifford Youth Activities Center•
provides limited child monitoring and day care based on job-related criteria. The Adderly
Home in Gifford may be converted to a child care center to handle up to 100 children.
Child care is not affordable for 2 parent families because they do not qualify for benfits.
• Life Skills Training: The chronically unemployed often lack the most basic skills in seeking
a job. Those skills include filling out a job application, how to interview, work ethics,
attitude, and elementary reading, writing and math skills.
• Criminal Records: Job seekers sometimes can not pass criminal record check; often for
crimes committed in their youth. Expungement may be available but is sometimes difficult
and expensive to obtain.
• Dn reoreneurshio T in; g: Indian River Community College has held one course in
"Entrepreneurship Training" that was attended by 12 people, another is planned.
• Hou ,sing: Many agricultural workers live in subsidized housing based on their earnings. -An
increase in earnings Will jeopardize their housing opportunities.
The majority of housing is H.U.D. housing. There is a need for private home owner
occupied housing opportunities.
MQ—S� Removal of the C.O.P.E. building has contributed to an increase in criminal
activity.
SHORT TERM (6 months) RECOMMENDATIONS
• Develop a structure to pursue future grants that would target the county's chronically
unemployed and underemployed.
• County officials should identify and talk to absentee owners of abandoned, distressed
properties; burn down remainder of crack houses and police known drug sales areas.
• Enforce all County codes, ordinances and laws consistently with other parts of the county.
• Identify the agencies and organizations that can provide the help being suggested in this
report.
• . Create better communications avenues for people to register for needed training classes.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-55-
�
114 PG 509
L
• Develop formal pian to address addiction problems within the minority community.
• Create a list of all available industrial/commercial properties.
• Recommend fiuther review of criminal record issues with law enforcement, the courts and
employers.
• Document and promote success stories.
• Organize 2nd Project KO.P.E. to reach target job seekers in the minority communities.
Possible tie-in to a "Gifford Business Day." �
• Identify ways to bring together target job seekers with employers.
• Designate beautification funds for the 45' Street corridor.
MID TERM (1 year)
• Black Minority Business Funds are now pooled with Palm Beach County. Recommend the
County Commission request a separate reporting of these monies to help local minority
businesses to gain access to these funds.
• Investigate recently developed Federal program for rural communities
• Install street lighting and sidewalks, and ensure the quality of public services is consistent
-oath other parts of the county.
• Adapt the current public transportation service to known job sites and related service
providers in the county and identify other transportation options to and from work.
• Create ways to communicate career opportunities to college graduates who have left
Indian River County; publicize area websites that provide information needed to the
community at large.
• Provide basic life skills training in the local community.
• Create a list of companies that offer on-the-job training.
• Create ways to encourage companies to locate in Gifford.
LONG TERM (18 months to 2 years)
• Research how to get a good representation of chronically unemployed and
underemployed, how many need training, what training is needed and available, and the
number and type of positions available for job seekers.
• Group the skills sets of the county's 20 most in -demand jobs identified by the Workforce
Development Board into "steps" that range from: 1) the most basic (life skills), to 2)
gradually more complex requirements (step two -aptitude; step three -basic math, etc.).
• Explore the future possibility of an enterprise zone in the Gifford.. _
AUGUST 8, 2000
{1I4PG510
-56-
• 0
Provide agency services on location in the community and to all areas of county where
target job seekers live.
• I3etermine available and future needed vocational training; provide access to that
training for target job seekers.
Attachment I:
INFORMATION AND NEEDS SURVEY
1. What will benefit you in finding a better job?
More income and the opportunity to get everything I need
Greater job skills
Better opportunities for my family
More responsibilities
Better future (job) opportunities
2. What will help you get trained for a better job?
Getting all the information needed (about training.)
On-the-job training `
Time (to get training)
3. Are you interested in starting your own business? What help do you need to get started?
Financial help
(Child care)
Information and resources
y Schooling
(Advice)
4. What do you want as your main goal in five years?
Financial security
A house
Education and (advancement) "
Start my own business
Bachelor's degree
5. What barriers, if any, do you have in your life that keep you from achieving your goal?
Money
(Child care)
Schooling
Time
Knowledge/information of more jobs
No response to job applications
6. What assistance is most important to you at this time?
Financial
Day care
Education/Night classes
Credit counseling
Encouragement
AUGUST 8, 2000
-57-
K14PGlI
1!n
0
0
r
0
C/1
%00
N
Cl
O
O
w
0 PCos 3ournat
.3� 1
Thursday
April 6, 2000
Stocks, Page D2 usiness
Classified, Page DS
Task force aims at self-esteem
■ The Indian River
County Chamber of
Commerce task force is
looking for ways to
improve the well-being
of all county residents,
hill Willi the primary
Focus on the low income
areas of Gifford and
f ellsmere.
By CHRIS KAUFFMAHN
Press Journal Stan Writer
At about 2 p.m. every day,
�f people start gathering at a shady,
spot at 43rd Street and Old Dixic
Ilighway in Gifford known as the
"Ugly 'free.- where they kill off
Ibelr afternoons playing dominos,
(itinking and socializing.
The almost exclusively stale
group is coluposed of young.
working -age aduhs lelwecn the
ages of 17 and 35.
Not lot) I:Ir away, at 41%1 Sirml
and Old Dixie, there is it similar
gathering spol for older Gifford
residents between lite ages of 40
and 65.
The connnon ihrcalls anuoll
(hese two groups is mosl of the
people are physically able to work,
but they generally have low sell=
esteem, few skills and not much
education. so, lhcsc nun erre job-
less ill an econonly crying out for
workers, and they have no hole
for a better economic fultne its a
country that is sewing unprem-
dented boom tinges.
The Workforce Enhancement
Task Force, it component of IIIc,
Indian River county ('bander of
Commerce, wants to change all
that.
Formed hisl snnu11er :it the re.
I� test of the county Con11nission,
I le task lin•ee is looking for ways
to improve file well -Irving of all
county midculs, but with the pri-
mary locus on the low income
areas of Gilli►rd and Fellsntere.
The [ask firrce will deliver it report
of its findings to the county son►e-
little ill.1111Y.
()in Wednesday. the [ask lirrce
look a hus lour of Gifford to get a
teller feel For the problems facing
lite community.
"Sonic (task Force) members
arc seeing for the firs[ lime the in-
lerior parts of Giflirrd," said hred-
(lie Woollirrk, the chairman of the
task three, who also runs the Gif-
lord Youth Activities Center. "We
W.1111 people to sec Ilse unentploy-
11nenl dilcouna in Gifford -- where
peorle hang out and what they do.
Anti we wan[ It) conte till wills all
action 111.11► to help Iluul.'
I le added. -They vital to make
it, they lust don't know how."
Pearly Ch:ntdler, the chamlter's
execulive director, noted there
have Ines efforts to improve Gif-
ford's plight in the past, hill those
were plecenleal aunt "trot all the
pieces fit together."
"This is a consolidated effort to
create it solution ft►r lite economic
problems Ihcre," she said.
As Wtolli►rk said Wednesday.
Gifford wasn't always an area of
economic blight and he pointed
out building after building that
were once home to small. success -
lid husinenes that are now hone
to nm -down pars or have been
a 1m ndoned' a h ogee her.
Ile :tillibuted most of the proh-
fent to the decision ill the Tale
1960s; to merge Gifford Iligh
school with Vcro (leach dligh
School.
When they lulled the high
school oul ill' Gilford, they pulled
the heilit oul of Gifford., Wool -
fork said.
.7
Attachment III
EXISTING COMMUNITY ASSETS
1. Gifford Youth Activities Center
2. Gifford Health Center (clinic)
3. Samaritan Center
4. Economic Opportunity Council (Head Start)
5. St. Peter's Academy (Charter School)
6. Gifford Community Center
7. Progressive Civic League of Gifford, FL, Inc.
8. Gifford Neighborhood Sick Watch Program
9. P.I.E. (Parents Involved In Education)
10. Sunset Apartments (Gifford.Elderly Community)
11. NAACP (National Association, of Colored People)
12. Pastor's Association of Indian River County
13. KA-P.S. (Kelloggs Academic Program for Success)
14. G.E.D. Program (General Equivalency Diploma)
15. Office Skills/Computer Classes
16. United Way of Indian River County (Parenthood Development)
17. Orangewood Apartments
18. Victory Park
19. Gifford Grove
20. Lindsey Gardens
21. Briarwood Apartments
22. Gifford Neighborhood Park
23. Martin Luther King Plaza
24. 'phis N That" Convenient Store
25. Laundry Mat
26. Dawsey's Auto Repair
27. Sunshine Auto Repair
28. Consalo's Bait & Tackle
29. Phlebotomy Class
30. Project Harmony (Sheriffs Dept.)
31. Lindsey Lanes
32. Moore's Pre School
33. Turner's Pre School
34. Beulahland (Assisted Living)
35. Gifford Middle School
36. C.O.P.E. (Community Oriented Policing Enforcement)
37. Street Lighting District
38. Meals on Wheels
39. New Hope Ministries (at Sunset Apt.$)
40. Apostolic Revival Center (Elderly Citizens Assistance Prowam)
41. Truth Bible College
42. Girl Scouts
43. Gifford Central Little League Baseball
44. Gifford Community Dancers (Youth)
AUGUST 8, 2000
-59-
BK 1 14 PG 513
PJ
45. Sheriff's Department Athletic League (Officer Teddy Floyd)
46. Water and Sewer Project
47. Our Father's Soup Kitchen (Mt. Zion A.M.E. Church)
48. St. Peter's Boot Camp (St. Peter's Missionary Baptist Church)
49. "Save The Children" Ministry/Evangelist Eugene Idlette
50. Indian River County Ministerial Council
51. Gifford Community Garden
52. Indian River Community College presence
53. Supportive Chamber of Commerce.
Mr. Woolfork recommended that the Board continue the efforts of the Task Force so
its initiatives can be achieved, with the number one priority being to establish and fund a
County office empowered to work with all agencies, institutions and private groups to
coordinate and carry forth the programs generated by this report.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF
WABASSO - REQUEST FOR AN ABANDONMENT OF A
PORTION OF 86TH PLACE (Legislative) - Scheduled for Public
Hearing on August 15, 2000
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 1, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D S ON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Developmentirecto
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP �� vv�
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 1, 2000
_i
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for the August 15, 2000 Board Meeting
AUGUST 8, 2000
-60-
BI{ 1 14 PG 514
0
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 8, 2000.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration at
its August 15, 2000 meeting.
1. First Baptist Church of Wabasso's Request for an Abandonment of a Portion of 86' Place
(Legislative).
RECOMMENDATION:
The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board's information. No action is
needed.
NO ACTION REQUMED OR TAKEN.
AUGUST S, 2000
-61-
•
BK 114 PG 515
i1.C. COMMUNICATIONS TOWER - ASSIGNMENT OF
LICENSE FROM SANDAB COMMUNICATIONS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II TO VERO BEACH
BROADCASTERS, LLC WEPUE - BONE - SANDABI
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 1, 2000:
Date:
To:
Thru:
From:
Subject:
August 1, 2000
The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director !% �•"�--�--
Assignment of License from Sandab Communications Limited Partnership H
to Vero Beach Broadcasters, LLC
EXHIBITS: Proposed Estoppel Certificate
October 2, 1985 License (Clark Depue)
January 21, 1988 Assignment of License (Gregory D. Bone, Trustee)
March 17,1992 Termination of License (Gregory D. Bone, Trustee)
March 17,1992 License (Sandab Communications Limited Partnership II)
BACKGROUND:
In October 2, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners first granted a license to occupy and improve
certain described property to Mr. Clark Depue. The actual use of the land through the license is for the
use of vehicle access, parking, pavement, landscaping and signage.
Subsequently, the 1985 license was assigned in January 21, 1988, to Gregory D. Bone, Trustee for
Highland Land Trust.
On March 17, 1992, a termination agreement was entered into between Gregory D. Bone, Trustee and
Indian River County terminating the original agreement dated October 2, 1985 which had been assigned
to Gregory D. Bone for Highland Land Trust dated January 21, 1988.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-62-
•
Also on March 17, 1992, a new License to Occupy and Improve County Property was approved and
entered into between Sandab Communications Limited Partnership II and Indian River County.
Vero Beach Broadcasters, L.L.C. have entered into a purchase agreement with Sandab Communications
L.P. II and are in need of having the License to be now assigned to Vero Beach Broadcasters, L.L.C. in
order to finalize the closing of the sale.
The request has been reviewed by the County Attorney's office with no objections. Additionally, I have
discussed the request with Public Works Director Jim Davis with no objections.
RECOMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval and Chairman's execution of the assignment of License from Sandab
Communications Limited Partnership II to Vero Beach Broadcasters, LLC utilizing the Estoppel
Certificate.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board, by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously approved the Assignment of License
from Sandab Communications Limited Partnership
H to Vero Beach Broadcasters, LLC utilizing the
Estoppel Certificate and authorized the Chairman to
execute same, as recommended by staff.
AUGUST 8, 2000
ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-63-
BIS 114 PG 5 17
•
B.A.1. CHAIRMAN FRAN B. ADAMS - CIVIC USERS AND
MULTI -FAMILY LAND USES IN SPECIAL
EXCEPTIONS
Chairman Adams stated that she had received a request from the VFW to use a
property on 26' Street adjacent to the Mall. Regulations do not currently allow for this use
in this zoning category. She asked for a direction to staff to bring back regulations for a
special exception use for this type of property in this zoning.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously directed staff to bring back a
recommendation regarding a special exception use
for civic organizations and non -profits such as the
Veterans of Foreign Wars.
13.A.2. CHAIRMAN FRAN B. ADAMS - RAISING ROOSTERS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 3, 2000:
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 3, 2000
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Fran B. Adams lrz�,
RE: Rooster raising
AUGUST 8, 2000
-64-
In less than a year, there have been two rooster raising operations locate in NW
Indian River County. Roosters are not raised for meat consumption or for improving the
production of egg laying chickens. Roosters are raised for fighting. There is no
evidence of rooster fights so far in Indian River County. However the so called farming
of these animals needs to be on a special exception use only. They are loud and tend to
begin crowing at 3:30 a.m. and end about 7:30 am. 100's of these roosters on 5 acres is
an obnoxious neighbor and should be an illegal operation. Smoking marijuana is illegal.
Growing the weed is illegal. Fighting roosters are illegal. Growing fighting roosters
should be illegal.
I request the Commission to instruct staff to formulate an ordinance making the
farming of roosters illegal, or at the very least, that it be a special exception use in the
agricultural districts. Please note that this does NOT prohibit having a few roosters for
pets or producing fertile eggs with chickens. We can limit the roosters to a maximum of
10 within the special exception category provided there are hens to accommodate them.
Thank you.
Chairman Adams commented that roosters are not raised for meat consumption.
There is currently no evidence of rooster fighting in the County but farming of these animals
needs to be a special exception use. Roosters make obnoxious neighbors and since rooster
fighting is illegal, it should be illegal to raise fighting roosters. Nothing is proposed to
restrict having a few roosters, up to a maximum of 10.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously directed staff to bring back a special
exception use requiring an application to raise more
than a maximum of 10 roosters as a special
exception use.
AUGUST 8, 2000
-65-
6K 1 14 PG 519
I
B.C. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT - BILLBOARD
ORDINANCE
Commissioner Macht noted that it has come to his attention that the County does not
have a billboard ordinance. He asked the County Attorney to draft such an ordinance for the
Board's consideration.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Grin absent)
unanimously directed the County Attorney to bring
— back a draft ordinance for the Board's consideration
regarding billboards.
B.D.I. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE - GIFFORD
SMALL AREA PLAN - (FREDDIE WOOLFOM -
WORKFORCE ENHANCEMENT TASK FORCE -
"FRONT PORCH" COMMUNITY
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 1, 2000:
DATE: August 1, 2000
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
SUBJECT: Small Area Plan — Gifford
AUGUST 8, 2000 BK 1 14 PG 520
-66-
This request has been purposely timed to coordinate with the report from the
Gifford Community Workforce Enhancement Task Force which will be presented at the
August 81 County Commission meeting. A number of significant events have occurred in
the Gifford area over the past year.
I have met with the community leaders almost monthly to work through numerous
problem areas: roads, drainage, zoning, law enforcement, and code violations. The
removal of the C.O.P.E. office lead to discussions with Sheriff Wheeler who has assured me
that an office facility will be returned to 45t° Street. Our Code Enforcement officers have
stepped up inspections. Public Works has continued to move forward with a much needed
drainage system while Habitat for Humanity has continued to provide new housing.
Presently, I am working with the Gifford Progressive League on the designation of
Gifford as one of the Governor Bush's "Front Porch" communities. If successful, this
designation will lead to additional grant monies for many of the items listed above.
In order for all of these important components to come together, the Gifford
community needs professional planning assistance. This planning assistance will help them
review their land use and zoning; identify and make improvements along their main
corridor, the Martin Luther King Boulevard 145t° Street]; and help implement the findings
of the task force.
Therefore, I recommend that this Commission request our Planning Department to
assist the Gifford Community in establishing a Small Area Plan review including a
corridor study of 45te Street as soon as possible.
Commissioner Stanbridge complimented the Workforce Development Task Force's
fine report and their significant efforts in Gifford over the past year. She noted that Sheriff
Wheeler has promised that the COPE unit will be reinstated and the Code Enforcement
Department will step up their efforts. She felt the Gifford area would be enhanced by
application for the Governor's "Front Porch" initiative which is for areas that need a hand
up. She asked the Planning Department to designate someone to work with the committee
on the Small Area Plan, including implementation of the 45' Street Corridor Study and to
implement the findings of the Task Force.
AUGUST S, 2000 Bit 114 PG 5 2'
-67-
L
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously directed staff to assist the Gifford
Community in establishing a Small Area Plan review
including a corridor study of 45`' Street as soon as
possible, as requested.
13.D.2. COMMISSIONER RUTH STANBRIDGE -
REGULATIONS OF USES FOR INDOOR GUN RANGES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 2, 2000:
DATE: August 2, 2000
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge ,
SUBJECT: Indoor Gun Ranges
As we all know, the indoor gun range in the Gifford area has been upheld by the court
system. The potential problems anticipated by the Gifford Community and the Commission may
still exist.
Unfortunately, we cannot do anything more about this indoor gun range in this location,
but before another one is proposed anywhere in the county, I would like the Attorney's Office
and the Planning Department to identify a way for us to regulate this use in relationship to where
it is proposed.
AUGUST 8, 2000
Bit 114 PG 522
-68-
Commissioner Stanbridge asked that the County Attorney and staff be directed to
identify ways to regulate the use of indoor gun ranges.
A. I Harris felt there should be laws concerning these ranges, especially in areas
where there are churches and shops nearby.
Freddie Woolfork asked that topless bars, adult bookstores and other uses of this kind
be included in the research.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Ginn absent)
unanimously directed staff and the County Attorney
to identify a way to regulate indoor gun ranges in
relationship to their location, as requested.
M.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None.
AUGUST 8, 2000
BK 1 14 PG 523
•
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Environmental Control Board. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 9:55 a.m.
ATTEST: _
I K. Barton, Clerk
�O-'Vt- d
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Minutes Approved: -?®®-0
AUGUST 8, 2000
-70-
BK I 1 � PG 524