HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/22/20009
MENUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2000 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25�h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
District 1
Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman
District 5
Kenneth R. Macht
District 3
Ruth M. Stanbridge
District 2
John W. Tippin
District 4
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP
PAGES
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. Fran B. Adams
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add Item 71, John Morrison Donation of Cottage and Relocation to Captain Forester Homestead (Cairns Tract) on Jungle Trail.
2. Add Item 8, Sheriff Wheeler Request for Chairman to Execute letter to Department of Justice Regarding COPS In Schools
Retention Plan.
3. Add Item 13.B., Discussion Regarding the Space Needs Committee.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of July 18, 2000
B. Special Meeting of July 24, 2000
C. Special Meeting of July 27, 2000
i
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA PAGES
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated August 10, 2000) 1-9
B. Consideration of Indian River County SHIP Program
Annual Reports
(memorandum dated August 3, 2000) 10-38
C. Contract Renewal for Uniform Rental Service
Piggyback Palm Beach County 91-059
(memorandum dated August 11, 2000) 39-42
D. Bid Award: IRC 2057 Emergency Generator for Fire
Station 11— Emergency Services/Fire District
(memorandum dated August 15, 2000) 43-47
E. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 019
(memorandum dated August 14, 2000) 48
F. Out -of -County Travel Request to Attend National
Association of Telecommunications Officers and
Advisors (NATOA) Conference
(memorandum dated August 16, 2000) 49
G. Resolution Designating a Portion of 128`h Court Right -of -
Way Between Bay Street and the St. Sebastian River as
"Limited Use Right -of -Way"
(memorandum dated August 15, 2000) 50-55
H. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated August 15, 2000) 56-57
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
BK 114 PG 617
BACKUP
9. PUBLIC ITEMS PAGES
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
- -- 1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR
±7.3 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
82ND AVENUE, ±250 FEET SOUTH OF SR60, FROM
CL, LIMITED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND A-1,
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT15 ACRES),
TO CG, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; AND
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVER-
ABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE
Wayne D. Clayton's Request to Rezone ±7.3 Acres
from CL and A-1 to CG (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated August 11, 2000) 58-68
2. Hovnanian Companies of Florida, Inc. Request for
Conceptual Planned Development (PD) Special Excep-
tion Use and Concurrent Preliminary PD Approval for
a 100 lot single-family development to be known as
Seasons Community
(memorandum dated August 16, 2000) 69-88
3. LDR Amendment Follow-up Hearing: Free-standing
Signs Near I-95 in the SR60 Corridor
(memorandum dated August 15, 2000) 89-112
4. 28th Avenue (North of 4h St.) Petition Water Service
Resolution III
(memorandum dated August 11, 2000) 113-125
5. Consideration of Six Cent Local Option Gas Tax
Revenue Distribution Formula
(memorandum dated August 14, 2000) 126-132
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Tommy McDougald Request to Speak on Harassment
(memorandum dated August 15, 2000) 133
2. Request from Francis M. Coffey to Comment on the
Sublease Agreement between Dept. of Environmental
Protection, State of Fla. and Indian River County
regarding submission of a Management Plan by the
County
(letter dated August 15, 2000) 134-135
I
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): BACKUP
PAGES
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS (cont'd.):
3. Request by Frank L. Zorc to be placed on Agenda.
Subj.: "Press Journal Wednesday, August 16, 2000
Setting a Public Hearing for Sept. 5 on the
proposed 1 -cent increase in the Tourist
Development Tax to help finance the deal"
(letter dated August 16, 2000) 136
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
Scheduled for Public Hearing on September 5, 2000:
Pine Tree Park Lake Property Owners' Association's
Request for Right -of -Way Abandonment for a Portion
of 6`h Street and 7`h Street in Pine Tree Park (Legislative)
(memorandum dated August 16, 2000) 137
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Proposed Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting
(memorandum dated August 16, 2000) 138
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
1. Consideration of the Indian River County Manatee
Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive
Management Plan
(memorandum dated August 8, 2000) 139-161
2. Board Approval of Option Agreement for County
Sale of the Fischer -St. Sebastian River Environ-
mental Land Purchase to the State for Cost -Share
Reimbursement under the State Conservation and
Recreation Lands (CARL) Program
(memorandum dated August 14, 2000) 162-185
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
•
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd
F.
Personnel
- -
None
G.
Public Works
West Side Subdivision — Acceptance of Private Roads,
Right -of -Ways and Drainage Easements
(memorandum dated August 14, 2000)
H.
Utilities
None
I.
Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A.
Chairman Fran B. Adams
B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
C. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
BX
1 14 PG 620
•
BACKUP
PAGES
186-190
BACKUP
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS PAGES
A. Emergency Services District
1. Approval of Minutes — regular meeting of 7/11/00
2. Authorization to Exchange Real Property with
Grand Harbor (Legend Properties, Inc.) for the
Construction/Relocation of Emergency Services
Station #5
(memorandum dated August 7, 2000) 191-214
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
Request to Schedule Public Hearing Date for
2000 Petition Hearing — Solid Waste Assessment Fees
(memorandum dated August 4, 2000) 215-216
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p.m.
BK 114 PG 621
•
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AUGUST 22, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1-
2. INVOCATION ................................................. -1-
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ...................................... .1-
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA .................................. .2-
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ........................ .2-
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 18, 2000 ......................... .2-
6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 241, 2000 ......................... .3-
6.C. APPROVAL OF NIINUTES - JULY 279 2000 .......................... 3-
7. CONSENT AGENDA ........................................... .3-
7.A. List of Warrants ........................................... .3-
7.B. SHIP Program Annual Reports .............................. .11 -
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK 114 PG 622
-1-
7.C. Uniform Rental Service - Aramark Uniform Services (Piggyback Palm
Beach County Contract 91-059) .............................. .14-
7.D. Bid #2057 -Emergency Generator for Fire Station #11- Dietz Enterprises
of Stuart ............................................... .16-
7.E. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #019 -Authorization for Budget
Amendment to Balance FY 1999-00 .......................... .18-
7.F. Out -of -County Travel - County Attorney Bangel - National Association of
Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Conference .. -19-
7.G. Resolution 2000-087 Designating a Portion of 1280` Court Right -of -Way
Between Bay Street and the St. Sebastian River as "Limited Use Right -of -
Way" - Joseph and Beverly Driver ........................... .20-
7.H. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs ................... .26-
7.I. John Morrison - Donation of Cottage and Relocation to Captain Forester
Homestead (Cairns Tract) on Jungle Trail ...................... .28-
8. SHERIFF GARY WHEELER - REQUEST FOR CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE
LETTER REGARDING COPS IN SCHOOL GRANT RETENTION PROGRAM
- U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED
POLICING SERVICES ......................................... .29-
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-027 - WAYNE D. CLAYTON -
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING
ZONING MAP FOR f7.3 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF 82ND
AVENUE, ±250 FEET SOUTH OF SR -60 FROM CL AND A-1 TO CG (Quasi-
Judicial).......................................................... 31 -
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK 1 14 PG 623
I
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - HOVNANIAN COMPANIES OF FLORIDA, INC.
(GORDON E. NUTT) - CONCEPTUAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE AND CONCURRENT PRELIM]NARY PD APPROVAL
FOR A 100 -LOT SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWN AS
SEASONS COMMUNITY ..................................... 43-
9.A.3. PUBLIC BEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-028 AMENDING THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs): CHAPTER 911, ZONING (FREE-
STANDING SIGNS NEAR I-95 IN THE SR -60 CORRIDOR) ........... .54-
9.A.4. PUBLIC BEARING - RESOLUTION 2000-088 CONFIRMING THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO
28TH AVENUE (NORTH OF 4TH STREET) (PROJECT NO. UW -99 -06 -DS)
......................................... .. ..............62-
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF 6¢ LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
REVENUE DISTRIBUTION FORMULA - (TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER
SHORES; TOWN OF ORCHID; CITY OF FELLSMERE, CITY OF
SEBASTIAN; AND CITY OF VERO BEACH) ...................... .68-
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TOMMY MCDOUGALD - REQUEST TO
SPEAK ON HARASSMENT .................................... .71 -
AUGUST 22, 2000
-3-
BK 1 14 PG 62 4
C
I
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY - REQUEST TO SPEAK
ON SUBLEASE AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF A
MANAGEMENT PLAN BY THE COUNTY (NORTH COUNTY PARK) .. -72-
9.B.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANK L. ZORC - REQUEST TO SPEAK ON
"PRESS JOURNAL, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2000, SETTING A PUBLIC
HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 5 ON THE PROPOSED 1¢ INCREASE IN THE
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX TO HELP FINANCE THE DEAL"
(DODGERS) ................................................. .75-
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
SEPTEMBER 5, 2000: PINE TREE PARK LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS'
ASSOCIATION - REQUEST FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT FOR A
PORTION OF 6THSTREET AND 7THSTREET IN PINE TREE PARK
(Legislative).................................................. .77-
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR - PROPOSED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
STRATEGY MEETING ........................................ .78-
11.A.1. MANATEE PROTECTION AND BOATING SAFETY
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CMP) - FISH AND
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (FWC); SAVE THE
MANATEE CLUB (SMC); AND MARINE ADVISORY/NARROWS
WATERSHED ACTION COMMITTEE QV ANWAC) ........... .78 -
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 625
•
11.A.2. ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER BUFFER PRESERVE - OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR COUNTY SALE OF THE FISCHER ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER
ENVIRONMENTAL LAND PURCHASE TO THE STATE FOR COST -
SHARE REIMBURSEMENT UNDER THE STATE CONSERVATION
AND RECREATION LANDS (CARL) PROGRAM ............. .88-
11.G. RESOLUTION 2000-089 ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS FOR AD AVENUE (40TH
AVENUE SW); GAME STREET (6TH LANE SW); AND DEUCE COURT (5TH
PLACE SW), AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN WEST
SIDE SUBDIVISION (WEST SIDE RACQUET CLUB - ISABELLE DAYTON)
............................................................ .92-
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN CAROLINE D. GINN - DISCUSSION REGARDING THE
SPACE NEEDS COMMITTEE ................................... .97-
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ............................. .97-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................ .97-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD .......................... .97 -
AUGUST 22, 2000
-5-
BK 1 14 PG 626
•
August 22, 2000
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25'' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, August 22, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Caroline
D. Ginn, Vice Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; John W. Tippin; and Ruth Stanbridge. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Adams called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
None.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Adams led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-1-
BK 114 PG 627
•
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Adams requested the following additions to today's Agenda:
1. Item 7.I., John Morrison Donation of Cottage and Relocation to Captain
Forester Homestead (Cairns Tract) on Jungle Trail.
2. Item 8., Sheriff Wheeler Request for Chairman to Execute Letter to
Department of Justice Regarding COPS In Schools Retention Plan.
Commissioner Ginn requested the addition of Item 13.B., Discussion Regarding the
Space Needs Committee.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously added the above items to the Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
None.
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 18, 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of July 18, 2000. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of July 18, 2000, as written.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 628
0 -2 0
-
6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 24, 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Special Meeting of July 24, 2000. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Special
Meeting of July 24, 2000, as written.
6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 279 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Special Meeting of July 27, 2000. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Special
Meeting of July 27, 2000, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 10, 2000:
AUGUST 22, 2000
-3-
38,11MEMEWIt
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: AUGUST 10, 2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of August 4, 2000 to August 10, 2000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for August 4, 2000 through
August 10, 2000, as recommended by staff.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0020695
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2000-08-04
4,037.46
0020696
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE
2000-08-04
162.86
0020697
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA)
2000-08-04
1,171.12
0020698
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
2000-08-09
442.80
0020699
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
2000-08-09
1,929.46
0020700
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
2000-08-09
3,428.42
0020701
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2000-08-09
5,652.32
0020702
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2000-08-09
144.10
0020703
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2000-08-09
6,500.00
0287368
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
2000-08-10
558.45
0287369
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
2000-08-10
1,029.70
0287370
ALCALDE, RENATO MD
2000-08-10
200.00
0287371
ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND
2000-08-10
630.69
0287372
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
2000-08-10
867.68
0287373
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
2000-08-10
905.07
0287374
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
2000-08-10
291.02
0287375
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2000-08-10
332.80
0287376
ABS PUMPS, INC
2000-08-10 =
47.40
0287377
AQUAGENI% LAND -WATER
2000-08-10
281.00
aUcusT 22, 2000 gK 1 14 PG 630
AUGUST 22, 2000
-s-
BX 1 14 PG 63 1
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK NAME-
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER -
FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
2000-08-10
59.90
131.45
0287378 ALL
RITE WATER CONDITIONING
2000 -OS -10
362.23
0287379 ALL
T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2000-08-10
65.99
0287380 A
2000-08-10
0287381 A T & T
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
2000-08-10
18,237.84
15.00
0287382
D287383 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
2000-08-10
2000-08-10
1,400.00
0287384 ALBERTSON'S2000-08-10
ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO
1,583.91
701.84
0287385
0287386 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
2000-08-10
2000-08-10
336.29
0287387 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS
2000-08-10
5,809.39
0287388 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
2000-08-10
510.10
0287389 ARCH PAGING
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
2000-08-10
1,360.00
72.38
0287390
2000-08-10
0287391 A T & T1,621.88
ENGINEERING SERVICES
500.00
0287392, AMERICAN
2000-08-10
0287393 AMERITREND HOMES
2000-08-10
125.43
0287394 ABC PRINTING CO2000-08-10
75.00
0287395 A T & T MEDIA SERVICES
2000-08-10
37,378.75
0287396 ATLANTIC AUTO SUPPLIERS
2000-08-10
400.00
0287397 ASSOCIATES, THE
& TESTING INC
2000-08-10
350.00
0287398 A M ENGINEERING
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
2000-08-10
844.95
24.32
0287399 ADVANCED
0287400 ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
2000-08-10
593.68
0287401 AHEAD HEADGEAR INC
2000-08-10
2000-08-10
3,820.75
0287402 AMJ EQUIPMENT CORP
2000-08-10
70.91
0287403 8 & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
2000-08-10
76,336.20
0287404 BARTH CONSTRUCTION
0287405 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
2000 -OB -10
2000-08-10
1,795.25
3,490.99
0287406 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2000-08-10
500.00
0287407 BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-08-10
150.72
0287408 BRESETT, DOROTHY JEANNE
2000-08-10
51,404.44
0287409 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
2000-08-10
384.21
0287410 BAKER & TAYLOR INC
2000-08-10
2,323.63
0287411 BRODART CO
2000-08-102,858.56
0287412 BREVARD BOILER CO
& TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
2000-08-10
12.05
0287413 BAKER
0287414 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
2000-08-10
261.35
26,967.39
0287415 BELLSOUTH
2000-08-10
2000-08-10
130.00
0287416 BOBCAT OF ORLANDO
CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
2000-08-10
30,688.54
0287417 BLUE
0287418 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS'
2000-08-10
305.92
47.18
0287419 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
2000-08-10
12.00
0287420 BLACKSTONE AUDIOBOOKS
2000-08-10
2000-08-10
7.48
0287421 BMG
0287422 BOYES & FARINA P A
2000-08-10
7,273.50
112.00
0287423 BROWN, MARY
2000 -OS -10
2000-08-10
810.00
0287424 BRENDLE, ROBERT W AND
2000-08-10
26.00
0287425 BINGHAM, KENNY JR
2000-08-10
259.48
0287426 BUSHNELL CORP
2000-08-10
500.00
0287427 BANOV, ROBERT
2000-08-10
77.97
0287428 BELLSOUTH
0287429 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-08-10
3,516.66
0287430 CLASSIC AWARDS
2000-08-10
2000-08-10
17.20
391.50
0287431 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
2000-08-10
142.20
0287432 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
0287433 COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC
2000-08-10
1,674.00
0287434 COMMUNICATIONS INTINC
2000-08-10
1,117.02
26,089.80
0287435 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
2000-08-10
2000-08-10
8,486.90
0287436 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
AUGUST 22, 2000
-s-
BX 1 14 PG 63 1
I
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
0287437
CLARKE, DOROTHEA
2000-08-10
23.49
0287438
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF
2000-08-10
5,395.83
0287439
CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL
2000-08-10
225.00
0287440
CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO.INC.
2000-08-10
500.00
0287441
C4 IMAGING SYSTEMS INC
2000-08-10
20.16
0287442
CARD CENTERS OF FL INC
2000-08-10
840.00
0287443
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
2000-08-10
353.14
0287444
CSR AMERICA, INC.
2000-08-10
196.19
0287445
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
2000-08-10
114.00
0287446
CAMPBELL, KEN
2000-08-10
78.00
0287447
CASCIO, MARYANN C
2000-08-10
224.00
0287448
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
2000-08-10
420.99
0287449
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
2000-08-10
9.58
0287450
COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC
2000-08-10
57.65
0287451
CENTER POINT PUBLISHING
2000-08-10
66.48
0287452
CRISLIP GLASS
2000-08-10
885.00
0287453
CAVILL, TOM
2000-08-10
52.00
0287454
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
2000-08-10
223.91
0287455
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
2000-08-10
720.00
0287456
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
2000-08-10
1,162.26
0287457
DEEP SIX DIVE SHOP, INC
2000-08-10
865.53
0287458
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
2000-08-10
545.52
0287459
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
2000-08-10
287.98
0287460
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
2000-08-10
41.09
0287461
DOCTOR'S CLINIC
2000-08-10
40.00
0287462
DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
2000-08-10
17.73
0287463
DAVIS, BETTY
2000-08-10
89.80
0287464
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
2000-08-10
182.79
0287465
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2000-08-10
500.00
0287466
DADE PAPER COMPANY
2000-08-10
291.05
0287467
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
2000-08-10
161.58
0287468
DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC
2000-08-10
25.00
0287469
DOUBLE TREE HOTEL
2000-08-10
237.00
0287470
DOYLE, STEVE
2000-08-10
24.94
0287471
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
2000-08-10
1,372.95
0287472
DALILI, CURTIS M D
2000-08-10
200.00
0287473
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
2000-08-10
52.25
0287474
ERCILDOUNE BOWLING LANES
2000-08-10
51.00
0287475
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
2000-08-10
150.00
0287476
EXPRESS REEL GRINDING, INC
2000-08-10
650.00
0287477
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
2000-08-10
3,806.55
0287478
EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS, INC
2000-08-10
631.74
0287479
ERICSSON, INC
2000-08-10
960.00
0287480
ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC
2000-08-10
2,306.25
0287481
EARLY CHILDHOOD DIRECT
2000-08-10
109.73
0287482
EGGLESTON, WILLIAM
2000-08-10
26.00
0287483
EXAC-TAC
2000-08-10
116.50
0287484
FATHER & SON APPLIANCE CO
2000-08-10
165.00
0287485
FEDEX
2000-08-10
85.06
0287486
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
2000-08-10
7,549.19
0287487
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
2000-08-10
164.00
0287488
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
2000-08-10
8,352.28
0287489
F S B P A
2000-08-10
275.00
0287490
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
2000-08-10
62.56
0287491
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
2000-08-10
1,177.47
0287492
F W P C O A
2000-08-10
15.00
0287493
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
2000-08-10
737.00
0287494
FENIMORE, CHARLES
2000-08-10
455.00
0287495
FLORIDA NOTARY SERVICE AND
2000-08-10
_ 118.90
0287496
FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-08-10
25.00
aUGUST 22, 2000 BK o 14 PG 632
0 0
-6-
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0287497
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
2000-08-10
30.00
0287498
FIRE ENGINEERING
2000-08-10
28.50
0287499
FLORIDA GAME & FISH COMMISSION
2000-08-10
78.89
0287500
F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
2000-08-10
0287501
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
2000-08-10
379.61
0287502
FIRSTLAB
2000-08-10
1,026.00
0287503
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
2000-08-10
2,592.95
0287504
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
2000-08-10
4,272.22
0287505
FLORIDA SANITARY SUPPLIERS
2000-08-10
168.06
0287506
GALE GROUP, THE
2000-08-10
1,585.50
0287507
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
2000-08-10
44.00
0287508
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-08-10
251.88
0287509
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
2000-08-10
2,273.26
0287510
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
2000-08-10
410.00
0287511
GRANDAGE,BRADFORD
2000-08-10
500.00
0287512
GRAY SUPPLY COMPANY
2000-08-10
34.09
0287513
GEAC COMPUTERS INC
2000-08-10
3,989.02
0287514
GRAVES & HILL, P A
2000-08-10
262.50
0287515
GOLDEN, ROBERT
2000-08-10
32.97
0287516
GOULD, COOKSEY,FENNELL,O'NEILL
2000-08-10
6,857.19
0287517
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
2000-08-10
583.87
0287518
HICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT
2000-08-10
182.00
0287519
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
2000-08-10
553.63
0287520
HILL MANUFACTURING
2000-08-10
175.00
0287521
HORIZON NURSERY
2000-08-10
300.00
0287522
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2000-08-10
1,500.00
0287523
HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING
2000-08-10
354.00
0287524
HEALTHY START COALITION OF
2000-08-10
25.00
0267525
HEARNDON, WILLIAM E
2000-08-10
982.10
0287526
HIDAY & RICKE, P.A.
2000-08-10
1,200.00
0287527
HERMAN, JOEL V
2000-08-10
670.38
0287528
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-08-10
4,000.00
0287529
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
2000-08-10
3,076.25
0287530
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-08-10
110.00
0287531
INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES, INC
2000-08-10
380.00
0287532
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
2000-08-10
66.50
0287533
INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
2000-08-10
174.77
0287534
INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
2000-08-10
25.00
0287535
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
2000-08-10
111.06
0287536
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
2000-08-10
11,936.77
0287537
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
2000-08-10
16.30
0287538
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
2000-08-10
47.44
0287539
INTER -TEL TECHNOLOGIES INC
2000-08-10
1,564.00
0287540
IBM CORPORATION
2000-08-10
920.77
0287541
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
2000-08-10
96.71
0287542
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2000-08-10
228,996.84
0287543
IVEY JR, ROBERT WAYNE
2000-08-10
36.05
0287544
INDIAN RIVER CUSTOM HOMES
2000-08-10
500.00
0287545
IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
2000-08-10
47.27
0287546
JACKSON ELECTRONICS
2000-08-10
80.67
0287547
JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
2000-08-10
75.00
0287548
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
2000-08-10
110.46
0287549
J A SEXAUER INC
2000-08-10
775.46
0287550
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
2000-08-10
1,805.33
0287551
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
2000-08-10
984.88
0287552
JOYCE MD, PETER H
2000-08-10
200.00
0287553
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
2000-08-10
1,595.00
0287554
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
2000-08-10
20,357.95
0287555
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
2000-08-10
2,947.29
0287556
KELLY TRACTOR CO
2000-08-10
60.00
AUGUST 22, 2000
-7-
I
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0287557
KAUFFMANN, ALAN
2000-08-10
533.00
0287558
K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING
2000-08-10
470.00
0287559
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
2000-08-10
114.58
0287560
KASER, JULIE
2000-08-10
50.00
0287561
L I TREE SERVICE, INC
2000-08-10
729.00
0287562
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
2000-08-10
3,361.92
0287563
L B SMITH, INC
2000-08-10
288.76
0287564
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
2000-08-10
514.50
0287565
LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC
2000-08-10
1,314.71
0287566
LESCO, INC
2000-08-10
433.09
0287567
LUNDMARK, ALEX
2000-08-10
115.88
0287568
LA CLAIR, LAWRENCE
2000-08-10
1,000.00
0287569
MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY
2000-08-10
1,126.05
0287570
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
2000-08-10
28.35
0287571
MIKES GARAGE
2000-08-10
260.00
0287572
MARQUIS WHO'S WHO
2000-08-10
273.44
0287573
MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC
2000-08-10
1,404.00
0287574
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
2000-08-10
174.01
0287575
3M JAA4230 (CM)
2000-08-10
755.66
0287576
MERCURY TECHNOLOGIES
2000-08-10
281.88
0287577
MULLER, MINTZ, KORNREICH,
2000-08-10
2,684.80
0287578
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
2000-08-10
382.60
0287579
MARC INDUSTRIES
2000-08-10
43.01
0287580
KGB CONSTRUCTION INC
2000-08-10
1,000.00
0287581
MURPHY, DEBBIE
2000-08-10
102.00
0287582
METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC
2000-08-10
325.00
0287583
MORTON SALT
2000-08-10
1,045.47
0287584
MILITANO, KYLE
2000-08-10
1,000.00
0287585
MARSHIANG, JAMES
2000-08-10
500.00
0287586
MARCHETTI, SHELLEY
2000-08-10
1,720.20
0287587
MELCHIORI, STEPHEN R
2000-08-10
67,900.73
0287588
MOLLOY, ANDREW J & CAROL A
2000-08-10
1,708.31
0287589
NICOSIA, ROGER J DO
2000-08-10
40.00
0287590
NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
2000-08-10
500.00
0287591
NATIONAL AMBULANCE BUILDERS,
2000-08-10
181.86
0287592
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
2000-08-10
33,369.25
0287593
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO
2000-08-10
23.70
0287594
NAPIER, WILLIAM M
2000-08-10
17.40
0287595
NU CO 2, INC
2000-08-10
84.00
0287596
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO
2000-08-10
1,721.71
0287597
NORTRAX EQUIPMENT COMPANY
2000-08-10
112.78
0287598
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
2000-08-10
2,008.45
0287599
ON IT'S WAY
2000-08-10
86.60
0287600
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
2000-08-10
4,129.99
0287601
O'NEIL, LEE & WEST
2000-08-10
17,271.02
0287602
PARKS RENTAL INC
2000-08-10
2,126.99
0287603
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
2000-08-10
305.55
0287604
PETERSON'S
2000-08-10
21.44
0287605
POSTMASTER
2000-08-10
66.00
0287606
PETTY CASH
2000-08-10
27.58
0287607
PORT PETROLEUM, INC
2000-08-10
250.15
0287608
PRESS JOURNAL
2000-08-10
122.00
0287609
PAK-MAIL
2000-08-10
:25.90
0287610
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
2000-08-10
69.00
0287611
POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
2000-08-10
324.00
0287612
PIERCE & ASSOCIATES
2000-08-10
500.00
0287613
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES, INC
2000-08-10
500.00
0287614
PMX MEDICAL
2000-08-10
863.65
0287615
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
2000-08-10
76.12
0287616
RINGHAVER
2000-08-10
262.08
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 114 PG 634
-8-
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0287617
ROTO ROOTER SEWER SERVICE
2000-08-10
1,760.55
0287618
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
2000-08-10
1,064.00
0287619
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
2000-08-10
23.26
0287620
RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC
2000-08-10
1,228.50
0287621
RECORDED BOOKS INC
2000-08-10
1,447.85
0287622
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
2000-08-10
62.51
0287623
.RATTRAY, C F JR MD PA
2000-08-10
200.00
0287624
REXEL CONSOLIDATED
2000-08-10
1,837.29
0287625
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
2000-08-10
959.19
0287626
RASMUSSEN, KARA
2000-08-10
301.28
0287627
RIVER TARPON INC
2000-08-10
500.00
0287628
RUDEN,MCCLOSKY,SMITH,SCHUSTER
2000-08-10
114.33
0287629
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
2000-08-10
427.21
0287630
SCOTTY'S, INC
2000-08-10
110.46
0287631
SEBASTIAN BUSINESS SUPPLY, INC
2000-08-10
26.01
0287632
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
2000-08-10
265.59
0287633
SIR SPEEDY #5054
2000-08-10
186.78
0287634
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
2000-08-10
3,372.07
0287635
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
2000-08-10
108.40
0287636
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
2000-08-10
509.11
0287637
ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
2000-08-10
179.85
0287638
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
2000-08-10
52.18
0287639
SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
2000-08-10
213.23
0287640
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
2000-08-10
240.00
0287641
SHERWOOD, FRANCES G
2000-08-10
110.64
0287642
SUBWAY STAMP SHOP INC
2000-08-10
66.88
0287643
SPALDING
2000-08-10
1,273.97
0287644
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
2000-08-10
2.74
0287645
SOLINET
2000-08-10
418.86
0287646
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
2000-08-10
487.83
0287647
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
2000-08-10
9,961.26
0287648
SANDERS COMPANY INC
2000-08-10
2,335.00
0287649
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-08-10
50.00
0287650
SMITH, RETA
2000-08-10
11.00
0287651
SCHLITT BUILDERS, INC
2000-08-10
500.00
0287652
STAMM MANUFACTURING
2000-08-10
470.80
0287653
SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
2000-08-10
42.72
0287654
SIGN PRO
2000-08-10
140.37
0287655
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2000-08-10
843.00
0287656
STAGE & SCREEN
2000-08-10
34.65
0287657
SERVPRO
2000-08-10
75.00
0287658
SECURITY FIRST TITLE PARTNERS
2000-08-10
369.18
0287659
SULLIVAN, CHARLES
2000-08-10
500.00
0287660
SPICER, RONALD
2000-08-10
500.00
0287661
SPHERTON CORP
2000-08-10
408.00
0287662
SEBASTIAN CHARTER JUNIOR HIGH
2000-08-10
57,797.55
0287663
STALHUT, SHANNON
2000-08-10
28.00
0287664
TARMAC AMERICA INC
2000-08-10
2,889.78
0287665
TITLEIST DRAWER
2000-08-10
1,227.80
0287666
TIPPIN, JOHN W
2000-08-10
74.24
0287667
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2000-08-10
6,434.37
0287668
TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES
2000-08-10
89.39
0287669
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
2000-08-10
45.00
0287670
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOOK CLUB
2000-08-10
172.28
0287671
T C BILLING CORPORATION
2000-08-10
9,389.56
0287672
T A P SOD
2000-08-10
3,794.52
0287673
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
2000-08-10
402.57
0287674
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
2000-08-10
898.02
0287675
THYSSEN MIAMI ELEVATOR
2000-08-10
1,958.00
0287676
TRADEWINDS SKATING CENTER
2000-08-10
1,068.00
AUGUST 22, 2000
la
BK 1 14 PG 635
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0287677
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
2000-08-10
744.35
0287678
UNIQUE BOOKS, INC
2000-08-10
81.07
0287679
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
2000-08-10
3,963.60
0287680
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-08-10
53,160.58
0287681
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
2000-08-10
401.25
0287682
VERO MARINE CENTER, INC
2000-08-10
73.63
0287683
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-08-10
102.00
0287684
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
2000-08-10
25.00
0287685
VERO BOWL
2000-08-10
177.60
0287686
VERO BEARING & BOLT
2000-08-10
1,145.28
0287687
VOLVO TRUCKS OF PALM BEACH
2000-08-10
366.00
0287688
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000-08-10
186.92
0287689
WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608
2000-08-10
1,144.92
0287690
WALSH, LYNN
2000-08-10
40.60
0287691
WILLHOFF, PATSY
2000-08-10
130.00
0287692
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
2000-08-10
118.80
0287693
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642
2000-08-10
100.99
0287694
WAL*MART STORE 931
2000-08-10
31.16
0287695
WELLINGTON HOMES
2000-08-10
500.00
0287696
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
2000-08-10
314.25
0287697
WASTE MANAGEMENT
2000-08-10
86,844.12
0287698
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
2000-08-10
989.44
0287699
WINN DIXIE
2000-08-10
9.96
0287700
W W GRAINGER INC
2000-08-10
712.40
0287701
WILLIAM GLOVER INC
2000-08-10
90,272.17
0287702
XEROX CORPORATION
2000-08-10
221.77
0287703
YOUNG PRILL FUNERAL HOMES
2000-08-10
300.00
0287704
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
2000-08-10
77.80
0287705
GOLIEN, GREGORY R
2000-08-10
23.33
0287706
DRESSING, IVANA
2000-08-10
12.63
0287707
PENNEY, MRS WILLIAM
2000-08-10
14.51
0287708
ZENTZ, RONNIE
2000-08-10
1.37
0287709
SHIN, MARION
2000-08-10
82.14
0287710
HARRIS, GEORGE
2000-08-10
21.89
0287711
CUMMINS, FRANK
2000-08-10
47.25
0287712
GIBSON, TONI
2000-08-10
31.52
0287713
SWARM, JOHN A
2000-08-10
28.94
0287714
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
2000-08-10
94.66
0287715
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION
2000-08-10
85.32
0287716
MGB CONSTRUCTION
2000-08-10
21.72
0287717
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2000-08-10
93.34
0287718
AMERITREND HOMES
2000-08-10
10.28
0287719
FAIRWAYS
2000-08-10
11.73
0287720
SPEEDO FITNESS CENTER
2000-08-10
111.54
1,229,908.82
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK ! 14 PG 636
-10-
0 0
7.B. STA7EH0USJ7VGINITl4TIVES (SHIP) PROGRAMAMVUAL .REPORTS
The. Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 3, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
obert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP S. 4
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: August 3, 2000
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHIP PROGRAM ANNUAL
REPORTS
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 22, 2000.
DESCRIP'T'ION AND CONDITIONS
On April 6, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Local
Housing Assistance Plan (Ordinance #93-13). By adopting the plan and subsequently receiving
Florida Housing Finance Corporation approval of the plan, Indian River County became eligible to
receive State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program funds.
The purpose of the SHIP program is to provide affordable housing for qualified households. As
structured, the county's SHIP Program provides low interest, deferred payment, subordinated loans
to eligible very low income, low income, and moderate income households. Most of these loans
provide downpayment and closing cost assistance, with private financial institutions providing
principal mortgages.
Since the plan was approved, the county received SHIP fund allocations of $250,000 per year for
FY 92/93, FY 93/94, and FY 94/95; $565,773 for FY 1995-96; $632,136 for FY 1996-97; $622,455
for FY 1997-98; $903,723.00 for FY 1998-99; and $749,773.00 for FY 1999-2000.
AUGUST 22, 2000 GK { 14 PG 6 3
-11-
The following table indicates the SHIP allocations and number of loans given to eligible applicants
by fiscal year and by income category.
SHIP PROGRAM REPORT
FY
MOUNT OF
HIP FUNDING
state funding
nly)
OF LOANS
APPROVED
# AND % OF LOANS APPROVED
BY INCOME CATEGORY
I
%
I
%
9
%
2-93
250,000.00
41
13
31.7117
1.66
11
6.83
3-94
250.000.00
37
12
2.4318
8.65
7
18.92
-95
250,000.00
0
11
6.6713
3.33
0.00
-96
565.773.00
8
19
2.76
5
0.34
6.90
-97
632,136.00
4
5
47.3034
5.95
6.76
17-98
622,455.00
5
2
3.85
6
5.38
10.77
-99
903,723.Q0
3
5.94
7
7.81
.25
-2000
749,773.00
5
19
42.2221
6.67
11.11
111.84
OTAL
5,122.476.00
K14
153
136.96
212j.21
9
VLI: Very Low Income
LI: Low Income
MI: Moderate Income
The table below indicates the number of loans foreclosed and the number of loans paid back to the
Housing Trust Fund to be utilized by other applicants.
SHIP Program Loan Foreclosures or Repayments
Total number of loans
granted
Foreclosure Action
Loan Repayments
Number
% of Total
Number
% of Total
414 (as of 6/7/00)
9
2.17
24
5.80
As per the requirements of the SHIP Program, the county must submit an annual report for each
fiscal year for which SHIP funds have been used. These reports must be signed by the Chairman of
the Board of County Commissioners or his designee. The closeout reports for FY 1992-93, FY
1993-94, FY 199495, FY 1995-96, FY 1996-97, and FY 1997-98 were previously submitted to the
state. Attached to this staff report are the county's SHIP Program FY 1998-99, and FY 1999-00
annual reports. All funds for FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000 have been expended, and the attached
reports are the closeout reports for these fiscal years. The SHIP annual reports must be submitted
to the state by September 15, 2000.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-12-
0
-I
•
ANALYSIS
According to state regulations, SHIP funds must be utilized in such a manner that all state
requirements and all requirements of the county's Local Housing Assistance Program are met.
Among the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP) requirements are the following:
• At least 30% of funds must be utilized by very low income (VLI) households
• At least 30% of funds must be utilized by low income (LI) households
• At least 65% of funds must be utilized for homeownership
• At least 75% of funds must be utilized for construction, rehabilitation and emergency repair
• Not more than 10% of funds can be utilized for administration costs
In administering the SHIP program, the county has met all of these requirements as well as local
requirements for homeownership, credit, employment, assets and others.
These two annual reports have been distributed to members of the county's Affordable Housing
Advisory Committee, the Affordable Housing Partnership Group, municipalities, Treasure Coast
Builders Association and other interested persons for their review and comment.
The purpose of this staff report is to request that the Board of County Commissioners review the
attached Annual SHIP reports and authorize the Chairman to sign the SHIP annual reports for fiscal
years 1998-1999 and 1999-2000.
ALTERNATIVES
The Board of County Commissioners has two alternatives with respect to the SHIP Annual Reports.
These are:
To approve the attached SHIP Annual Reports and direct staff to submit the reports to the
Florida Housing Finance Corporation.
Not to approve the attached SHIP Annual Reports. Choosing the second alternative,
however, would cause the county to become ineligible to receive additional SHIP funds.
Staff supports the first alternative.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached SHIP Annual
reports and authorize the Chairman to sign these reports.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 1 B 4 PG
-13- 6 3 9
0
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously approved the SHIP Annual Reports and
authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended by staff.
COPIES OF REPORTS ARE ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Z C. UNIFORMRENTAL SERVICE - ARAm4m UNIFORMSERVICES
OGGYBACKPALMBEA CH COUNTY CONTRACT 91-059j
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 2000:
DATE: August 11, 2000
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame. General Services Director 11"-d
FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager���,'�
SUBJECT: Contract Renewal for Uniform Rental Service
Piggyback Palm Beach County 91-059
It is respectfully requested the information contained herein be given formai consideration by the
Board of County Commissioners at the next regular scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Aramark Uniform Services has been providing the County Departments with a uniform rental
service since October 1, 1995. This annual contract is a result of utilizing the existing contract
from Palm Beach County Bid #91-059. On September 28, 1998, the Board approved staffs
recommendation to renew the existing contract with Aramark Uniform Services for an additional
three (3) year period beginning October 1, 1998 through September 30, 2001 at the 1995 pricing
schedule. Formal re -bidding would then occur before the beginning of FY 2001-2002.
AUGUST 22, 2000 ou [ PG 640
-14-
Due to the increase in fuel and environmental charges, Aramark Uniform Services has requested
an increase to our current uniform prices. The standard industrial uniform cleaning service will
increase from $4.25 to $4.50 per week per employee and the executive uniform cleaning service
will increase from $6.75 to $7.12 per week per employee. It should be noted that this would be
the last renewal without bid. Next year, a bid will be placed for new competitive prices.
In addition, upon request from the County, Aramark Uniform Services will furnish an inventory
of eleven (11) industrial shorts at a charge of $2.70 per week per employee for the Building and
Grounds Division and the Park Department employees.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the review, it is staff s recommendation to amend our existing contract for services
with Aramark Uniform Services and approve the price increase for the upcoming fiscal year.
This action will insure that Indian River County will continue to provide a uniform rental service
to our County employees at the most cost-effective pricing levels available today.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously agreed to amend the existing contract
for services with Aramark Uniform Services and
approved the price increase for the upcoming fiscal
year, as recommended by staff.
AUGUST 22, 2000
CONTRACT WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
-15-
BK114P641
0
ZD. BID #2057 - EMERGENCY GENERATOR FOR FIRE STATION #11- DIETZ
ENTERPRISES OF STUART
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2000:
DATE: August 15, 2000
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator /
Thomas Frame, General Services Directorel,,��i.G/°
FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manage;*
SUBJECT: Bid Award: IRC 2057 Emergency Generator for Fire Station 11
Emergency Services/ Fire District
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
Specifications Mailed to:
Replies:
"No Bid" Response:
VENDOR
Dietz Enterprises
Stuart, Fl
Emergency Power Systems
Orlando, Fl
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID
SOURCE OF FUNDS
ESTIMATED BUDGET
AUGUST 22, 2000
August 8, 2000 at 2:00 P.M.
July 18 & 25, 2000
Nineteen (19) Vendors
Two (2) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
BID TOTAL
$18,575.00
$25,480.00
$18,575.00
Optional Sales Tax /Fire Services/ Other Machinery &
Equipment 315-120-522-06649
$25,000.00
BK 114 PG 642
•
RECONM ENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Dietz Enterprises of Stuart. Florida as the lowest
most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to
Bid.
Orr M-WITI-A"���'
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #2057 to Dietz
Enterprises of Stuart, Florida at a cost of $18,575, as
recommended by staff.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-17-
BKl14PG643
ZE. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT #019 - A UTHORIZATION FOR
BUDGET AMENDMENT TO BALANCE FY 1999-00
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 14, 2000:
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: August 14, 2000
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 019
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E. Brown 4
Budget Manager
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS
The 1999/2000 fiscal year ends September 30, 2000. All budget amendments must be done prior
to the close of the fiscal year to be in proper compliance.
I would like the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the Budget Manager to do the
necessary budget amendments for balancing the budget for the 1999/2000 fiscal year.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously authorized Miscellaneous Budget
Amendment #019 allowing the Budget Manager to
do the necessary budget amendments for balancing
the budget for the 1999/2000 fiscal year, as
requested by staff.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK ! 14 PG 644
ZF. OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL - COUNTYATTORNEYBANGEL - NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS
,(NA TOM CONFERENCE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 16, 2000:
' Board Cemfied, Cay, County & Local Government law Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney'
William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney'
August 16, 2000 MEMORANDUM
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney -a.6 01,40t,
Re: National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors
("NATOA") Conference
Recommendation:
That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the county attorney to attend
NATOA's 20'h Annual Local Government Telecommunications Conference September 13-
16, 2000, in Los Angeles, California.
Discussion:
1 respectfully request authorization to attend NATOA's 20' Annual Local
Government Telecommunications Conference September 13-16, 2000, in Los Angeles,
California. I have attended the NATOA conference on two previous occasions, and have
found it to be a valuable source of information and contacts regarding telecommunications
issues facing local governments. The County Attorney's Office budget contemplates
attendance at this seminar.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously approved out -of -county travel for
County Attorney Paul Bangel to attend NATOA's
20' Annual Local Government Telecommunications
Conference September 13-16, 2000 in Los Angeles,
California, as requested.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-19-
Bit 1 14 PC 645
Z G. RESOLUTION 2000-087DESIGNATING A PORTION OF 128TH COURT
RIGHT-OF-WAYBETWEENBAYSTREET AND THE ST. SEBASTIANRIVER
AS "LIMITED USE RIGHT-OF-WAY" - JosEPHAND BEVERLYDRIVER
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2000:
"Board Certified, City, Courcy& LaW Govw== Law Paul G. Baagel, Co=yA=rnL7-
William G. Corns II, Delnuy County Attorney -
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM:i William G. Collins II —Deputy County Attorney
DATE: August 15, 2000
SUBJECT: Resolution Designating a Portion of 128th Court Right -Of -
Way Between Bay Street and the St. Sebastian River as
"Limited Use Right -Of -Way"
On August 1, 2000 the Board of County Commissioners held a duly noticed
public hearing to consider abandoning that portion of 128th Court lying between
Bay Street and the St. Sebastian River on the application of Joseph and Beverly
Driver. At that meeting the Board determined that it would be in the best interest
of the public to retain the right-of-way for the limited use purposes of pedestrian
access, drainage and utility uses.
The only persons known at this time to utilize 128th Court are Joe and Beverly
Driver who utilize the south portion of the right-of-way as driveway access to their
house. Their only other potential driveway access off Bay Street is blocked by a
large oak tree which they do not wish to cut down.
Since the Drivers bought their property by reference to a plat which showed
128th Court as a public right-of-way, and since they in fact have used it as a
driveway, they have an implied easement which would be upheld in a court of
law to continued use of a portion of that right-of-way as their driveway. Due to
that fact, the resolution accompanying this agenda item has been styled to
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 0 I 4 PG 646
-2a
designate 128th Court between Bay Street and the St. Sebastian River as a
limited use right-of-way for pedestrian access, drainage and utility uses and
driveway access for Lot 5, Block B-5 (the Driver property). All other general
vehicular traffic would be barred.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached resolution implementing the
August 1, 2000 directive of the Board not to abandon the right-of-way, but to
designate it as a limited use right-of-way.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-087
providing for a portion of 128` Court Right -of -Way
in the Townsite Plat of Roseland to be designated as
Limited Use Right -of -Way (Joseph and Beverly
Driver).
AUGUST 22, 2000
-21-
BK 1 14 PG 6 4 7
I
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -01 -
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A PORTION OF 128TH COURT
RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE TOWNSITE PLAT OF ROSELAND TO BE
DESIGNATED AS LIMITED USE RIGHT-OF-WAY; SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LYING IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2000 the Board of County Commissioners adopted ordinance
No. 2000-004 which established in the county land development regulations a definition for and
reference to "limited use rights-of-way"; and
WHEREAS, "limited use rights-of-way" are defined as rights-of-way used for non -general
vehicular traffic purposes such as for pedestrian, drainage, and utility uses; and
WHEREAS, such a designation provides a benefit to abutting lot owners by reducing
building setbacks on abutting lots; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is authorized to designate a county right-
of-way as a "limited use right-of-way"; and
WBEREAS, Indian River Couaty desires to designate as a limited use rig& -of -way that
portion of 128'h Court north of 83'd Avenue, between block B5 and B6 Townsite plat of Rosland, said
right-of-way segment being more particularly described as :
Lewis Street (now known as 128' Court), a 50 -foot wide street lying North of Sebastian
Avenue (now known as Bay Street), and running to the South shore of the Sebastian River, according
to the plat of the Townsite of Roseland recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 43 of the Public Records of
St. Lucie County, Florida. Now lying in Indian River County, Florida.
and shown on the attached map (SEE EXHIBIT'Wl; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County has determined that all lots that abut the subject right-of-
way other than Lot 5, Block B5 have frontage on other county road rights-of-way that provide
general vehicular access to each abutting lot; and
WHEREAS, the Indian River County board of County Commissioners held a duly noticed
public hearing on August 1, 2000 to consider the disposition of said right-of-way and determined
it in the best interest of the county to designate the subject right-of-way as a "limited use right-of-
way„
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
AUGUST 22, 2000 � � � P� 648
-22- BK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-.9-87
1. The subject segment of county right-of-way is hereby designated as "limited use right-of-
way" as defined and referenced in the county land development regulations, and shall not be used
for. general vehicular traffic purposes but may be used for pedestrian, drainage, and utility uses
authorized by the county, and driveway access for Lot 5, Block B5, Townsite plat of Roseland.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner G i nn who moved
its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner S t a n h r i r1 g P ; and upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Age
vice
Ayevice - Chairman Caroline Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge A v e
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 2 2 n d day of
An9net .2000.
Attest; J 'Bfin; rk
Deputy Clerk
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this 12 3.d_day of A g n e t
2000.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By Qom_S8 da�--
Fran
B. Adams
Chairman
CCI HEREBY C
r�E
1cR
eTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State
and PATRTC1rA'PJ'eE�cknowledgments, personally appeared FRAN ADAMS, and
as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy
Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-23-
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- n a Z
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this e?—&,/day of
A.D., 2000.
4-2�
otary Public
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY: pPpppA�Uh
•P
William G. CoWns, �'aR°"�Nwm
�crc�v.orrovlaoo <
Deputy County Attorney wasHor�ar. v�.x,,.sa„s <
APPROVED AS TO PUBLIC WORKS MATTERS
BY: kl .
' Kafer, P.E.
County Engineer
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
BY
Robert M. Keating, AICP, D' actor
Community Development Division
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG G50
-24-
LI
60 0 30 60 120
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET) 21-30-38-00005-0360-00001.0
BLOCK B6, LOT 1
(LEWIS STREET—Plat)
j
I U- BLOCK B5, LOT 5
ZQ 21-30-38-00005-0350-00005.0
�m�
2
STREET ABANDONMENT �-
DESCRIPTION
Lewis Street (now known as 128th Court), a 50—foot wide street, lying North of Sebastian Avenue (now known as
Bay Street), and running to the South shore of the Sebastian River, according to the plat of the Townsite of
Roseland recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 43 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida.
Now lying in Indian River County, Florida.
CERTIFlCATION
I, Charles A. Cramer, hereby certify that I am a registered Professional Surveyor and Mapper licensed to practice in
the state of Florida, that this sketch was made under my immediate supervision, and that it is accurate and correct.
I further certify that this sketch meets the Minimum Technical standards as described in Chapter 611317 of the Florida
Administrative Code, pursuant to F.S. Chapter 472.
Charles A. Cramer, P.S.M. Reg. #4094
Indian River County Surveyor
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960
(561) 567-8000
Dote
3
0
r
U
H
co
N
N
J
lL
3
0
a
U
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY `
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PREPARED FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
O
O
O
N
N
N
W)
'.
1
tA
N
F,
ZH. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT -RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2000:
• Board C=fied, City, Caumy & Local Gom= m Law
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
DATE: August 15, 2000
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
Paul G. Banrl, C—yA--y*
William G. Colli- IL DqutyCoumy Amy"
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors
for the weeks of July 17 through August 7, 2000. Listed below are the vendors and the amount of
each court -related cost.
Vendor.
Payment for.
Amount:
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
39.93
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
24.50
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
73.50
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
77.00
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
51.50
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
101.50
Suncoast Mental Health
Clinical Evaluation
712.50
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
73.50
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
84.00
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
308.00
Soren Barrett, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
143.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
98.00
Janet C. Prosper
Transcription
101.50
Peggy Gollnick
Transcription
56.00
Patricia W. Key
Transcription
42.00
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
252.00
Suncoast Mental Health Serv.
Clinical Evaluation
50.00
Psychological Affiliates Inc.
Expert Witness
131.00
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
73.50
Cristi Martin
Transcription
101.50
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
73.50
Janet C. Prosper
Transcription
70.00
Janet C. Prosper
Transcription
182.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
80.50
Cristi Martin
Transcription
59.50
Crisfi Martin
Transcription
49.00
auGusT 22, 2000 011 114 PG 652
-26-
I
Olga Mas
Court Interpreter
50.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
105.00
Janet C. Prosper
Transcription
171.00
Sheila 1. Flinn
Transcription
80.50
Karen M. Orlando
Transcription
45.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
157.50
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy. D.
Clinical Evaluation
575.00
Cristi Martin
Transcription
101.50
Cristi Martin
Transcription
66.50
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
300.00
Floyd Evans
Court Interpreter
50.00
Cristi Martin
Transcription
52.50
Shirley E. Corgin
Transcription
70.00
Smartcorporation
Public Defender Costs
10,22
Pegasus Travel
Witness Coordination
277.00
Lynn Park
Witness Coordination
160.20
Sandy Crawford
State Attorney Costs
9.00
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
11200
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
161.00
Michael C. Riordan, Psy.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Cristi Martin
Transcription
182.00
Shirley C. Corbin
Transcription
98.00
Sandy Crawford, Clerk
State Attorney Costs
6.00
Shiriey E. Corbin
Transcription
161.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
94.50
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
13.78
Cristi Martin
Transcription
86.50
Diane Mc. Maloysek, Clerk
State Attorney Costs
4.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
45.50
Unishippers
Transcription
33.78
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
94.50
Barbara G. Schopp
Transcription
94.50
Barbara G. Schopp
Transcription
56.00
Patricia B. Held
Transcription
87.50
Linda R. Phillips
Transcription
367.50
Victoria J. Limberis, PDI
Public Defender Costs
17.40
Barbara G. Schopp
Transcription
80.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
570.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
70.00
Elisa LesCamela
Transcription
66.50
Cristi Martin
Transcription
24.50
Total
$5,153.88
cc: Honorable Paul B. Kanarek, Chief Judge
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-27-
ZL JOHNMORRISON- DONATION OF COTTAGE AND RELOCATION TO
CAPTAIN FORESTER HOMESTEAD6CAIRNS TRACT ON JUNGLE TRAIL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 22, 2000:
Memorandum
DATE: August 22, 2000
To: Members, Board of County Commissioners
From: Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Re: Donation of classroom
Late last week, Mr. John Morrison called concerning a small cypress
cottage [20 x 20 feet] that was available to be relocated if the county had
a need.
Jim Davis and I inspected this building and agreed the building was in
excellent condition and could be of use to the county. Both the building
and the relocation are to be donated with the only conditions being the
relocation must be accomplished as soon as possible.
Therefore, I would lice the Commission's permission to pursue the
details of the donation and its relocation to the Captain Forester
Homestead [Cairns Tract] on Jungle Trail. This building can be
incorporated into the site plan, now in design, and utilized as a future
classroom.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously accepted the donation of the cypress
cottage to be relocated to the Captain Forester
Homestead (Cairns Tract) on Jungle Trail.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK I I 4 PG 6 5 4
-28- 40
8. SHERIFF GARY WHEELER - REQUEST FOR CHAIRMAN TO
EXECUTE LETTER REGARDING COPS IN SCHOOL GRANT
RETENTION PROGRAM - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES
The Board reviewed a letter of August 17, 2000:
6-berif f
GARY C. WHEELER • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
405541 St AVENUE VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700
August 17, 2000
The Honorable Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
Re: COPS In Schools Retention Plan
Dear Chairman Adams:
RECEIVED
AUG 1 7 2000
6OAiD OF COUNTY
C-0MM1SSIGN
I would like to request that the attached letter be placed on the next Commission Agenda They have
requested additional wording and have given a 5 -day time frame in which to return the document. They
will be making their awards during August. If we wait until September, we will be included in their
September/October awards but do not know if there will be funding available at that time.
I appreciate your consideration to placing this on the August 22nd Agenda
Sincerely,
1��. Lv,(..�e....
Gary C. wheeler, Sheriff
AUGUST 22, 2000
-29-
BK 1 14 PG 655
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adana
Ruth M. Stanbridge
Chairman
�. District 2
District I
^
ag Kenneth R. Maeht
Caroline D. Ginn
* # District 3
Vice Chairman
District S
�OR1�4' John W. Tippin
District 4
August 22, 2000
U. S. Department of Justice
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
Universal Hiring Program Control Desk, 76 Floor
1100 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington, D. C. 20530
RE: COPS In Schools Retention Plan
To Whom 8 May Concern:
The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners supports the efforts of the Indian River
County SherMfs Office as a community policing agency. As part of the community policing endeavor,
the Sheftifs Office has been awarded several COPS grants Including Universe! Hiring, COPS AHEAD,
and COPS MORE'98.
In reviewing the approving COPS Grant applications. the Board adamwiedes the fiscal
responsibilities of retaining these requested positions at the dose of the grant period. For this very
reason, we conduct a five year fiscal imps study prior to ping with any grant: application.
Therefore, in approving and signing the grant papers, we have anticipated the future financial needs of
retaking the positions and will utilize the general fund portion of budget process to accomplish. The
authorized strength of the Sheriffs Office is increased accordingly. as such grants are awarded, and
Incorporated Into the ShefHfs Office budget We commit to retaining the COPS funded position for
one full local budget cycle following the conclusion of federal funding; Increasing tax revenues
generated by growth will be utilized to accomplish this.
Although growth brings with it many chafiernges, we also recognize the responsibility get has
to provide vital services to Its community, and welcome the opportunity to tske advantage of federal
funds to augment local dollars and provide an Increased level of service to our community.
Please be assured of our continued cooperation.
Sincerely,
Fran B. Adams. Chairman Gary C. Wheeler. Sherif
Board of County Commissioners
August 22. 2000
Date Date
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to
execute the letter to the U.S. Department of Justice,
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
regarding the COPS in Schools Retention Plan, as
requested.
auGusT 22, 2000 BK 114 PG 656
• -30- 0
0
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-027 - WAYNE D.
CLAYTON - AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±7.3
ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF 82ND
AVENUE, ±250 FEET SOUTH OF SR -60 FROM CL AND
A-1 TO CG (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
o elft M. Keating, AICP; ommpn' Development Director
THRU: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning S -/�-
FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planningl�
DATE: August 11, 2000
RE: Wayne D. Clayton's Request to Rezone f7.3 Acres from CL and A-1 to CG
(RZON 2000-05-0013)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 22, 2000.
This is a request to rezone a ±7.3 acre parcel located on the east side of 82nd Avenue, ±250 feet south
of SR 60. As depicted in Figure 1, the north ±250 feet of the subject property are zoned CL, Limited
Commercial District, while the remainder of the site is zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1
unit/5 acres). The request is to rezone the entire parcel to CG, General Commercial District. The
purpose of this request is to secure the necessary zoning to develop the site with retail and service
uses.
On July 13, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board
Of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from CL and A-1 to
CG.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-31-
8K 114 PG 657
r
Figure 1: Zoning and Location of the c„h;Pt-.
The subject property consists of vacant wooded land. The north t1.7 acres of the site are zoned CL,
while the remaining t5.6 acres are zoned A-1. Land adjacent to the site on the north is zoned CG
and contains a convenience store with a gas station and a restaurant. Land abutting the site on the
east is zoned CL and is vacant and wooded. Land bordering the site on the south is zoned A-1 and
contains citrus groves. West of the subject property, across 82nd Avenue, land is zoned CG and
contains a truck stop and an auto service center.
AUGUST 229 z000 BK 0 I 4 PG 658
-320 0
-
The subject- property and properties to the north, east and west are designated C/l, Commercial/
Industrial, on the future land use map. The C/I designation permits various commercial and
industrial zoning districts. Land to the south of the site is designated M-1, Medium -Density
Residential -1, on the future land use map. The M-1 designation permits residential uses with a
density up to 8 units/acre.
Environment
The subject property consists of pine flatwoods, a native upland habitat. Inspection of aerial
photographs indicates a small wetland may exist in the northeastern portion of the site. According
to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard areas.
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Potable water distribution lines extend to
the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant, while wastewater collection lines extend to
the site from the West County Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Transportation System
Access is provided to the site by 82nd Avenue, an urban principal arterial road on the future roadway
thoroughfare plan map. The segment of 82nd Avenue that abuts the subject property is a two lane
road with approximately 60 feet of public road right-of-way. As a possible location for the proposed
Citrus Highway (running through Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River Counties, the Citrus Highway
would provide citrus hauling trucks a direct link between groves, packinghouses, and markets), 82n°
Avenue is programmed for expansion to 136 feet of public road right-of-way and four lanes by 2020.
There are many similarities and some differences between the existing CL zoning district and the
proposed CG district. The CL district is intended to serve, and be more compatible with, nearby
residential development. Therefore, in terms of permitted uses, the CL district is generally more
restrictive. In contrast, the CG district allows somewhat more intense commercial development.
The differences between the districts are best illustrated by their purpose statements. These purpose
statements are as follows:
• CL, Limited C:ommerrial District- The CL, Limited Commercial, district is intended to
provide areas for the development of restricted commercial activities. The CL district is
intended to accommodate the convenience retail and service needs of area residents, while
minimizing the impact of such activities on any nearby residential areas.
• CG- General C:ommerri^l District The CG, General Commercial, district is intended to
provide areas for the development of general retail sales and selected service activities. The
CG district is not intended to provide for heavy commercial activities, such as commercial
service uses, heavy repair services or industrial uses.
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented.
Specifically, this section will include:
AUGUST 22, 2000
-33BK 1 14 NO 659
-
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for. Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive
Plan and LDRs also require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum
acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional
concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed
project.
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's LDRs, projects
which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements. The
t1.7 acre CL zoned portion of the subject property is exempt from concurrency review because the
requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of that portion of the subject property. By
changing the zoning of that portion of the subject property from CL to CG, various uses not currently
allowed will be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of that land would be
the same with either zoning district, changing that land's zoning from CL to CG will not create
additional impacts on any concurrency facilities.
When new development is proposed for the subject property, a more detailed concurrency analysis
will be conducted during the development approval process.
The remaining t5.6 acres of the subject property, zoned A-1, are subject to concurrency review,
because rezoning that property to CG would increase the use intensity of the land.
Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be
based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning district.
For commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to Future Land Use Element
Policy 1.16 and the county's Land Development Regulations) is retail commercial with 10,000
square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for rezoning. The information used for the
concurrency analysis of the agriculturally zoned portion of the subject property is as follows:
1. Size of Area analyzed for concurrency: f5.6 acres
2. Existing Zoning District: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
3. Proposed Zoning District: CG, General Commercial District
4. Most Intense Use of Subject
Property under Existing Zoning District: 1 Residential Unit
5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
under Proposed Zoning District: 56,000 square feet of Retail Commercial (Shopping
Center in the 6s' Edition ITE Manual)
auGusT 22, z000 gg 114 PG 660
-34-
•
Transportation
As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA
reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips
to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as
roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more
project trips, whichever is less.
According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by a 56,000 square foot shopping center on the subject property.
Water
The most intense commercial use of the subject property will result in water consumption at a rate
of 22 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs), or 5,500 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of
service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. The subject property will be serviced by the South County Reverse
Osmosis Plant. This plant has a remaining capacity of approximately 4,500,000 gallons/day and can
accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed zoning district.
Wastewater
The subject property will be serviced by the West County Wastewater Plant. Based upon the most
intense use allowed under the proposed zoning district, development of the property will have a
wastewater generation rate of approximately 22 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs), or 5,500
gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. The West
County Wastewater Plant currently has a remaining capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons/day and
can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the proposed zoning district.
Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. For a
56,000 square foot commercial development on the subject site, solid waste generation will be
approximately 367 waste generation units (WGU) annually. A WGU is a Waste Generation Unit
measurement equivalent to one ton (2,000 pounds) of solid waste. Using the accepted conversion
rate of one cubic yard for every 1,200 pounds of compacted solid waste generated, the 56,000 square
feet of commercial development would be expected to generate 612 cubic yards of waste/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a four year
capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on staff analysis, it was
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the
proposed rezoning.
Drainage
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M -I Drainage Basin and the Indian
River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited
from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the
approved IRFWCD discharge rate.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-35-
BK 1 14 PG 66 1
•
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property
does not he within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply.
With the most intense use of this site under the proposed zoning district, the maximum area of
impervious surface would be approximately 255,784 square feet, or 5.9 acres. The maximum runoff
volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given
the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 231,927 cubic feet. In order
to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain
approximately 179,639 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject
property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is 19.41 cubic feet/second.
Based upon staff s analysis, the drainage level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site
discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and
requiring retention of the 179,639 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property.
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval
process.
Recreation
Recreation concurrency requirements apply only to residential development. Therefore, this
rezoning request would not be required to satisfy recreation concurrency requirements.
Concurrency Summary
Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities,
including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to
accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district.
Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request.
Generally, this rezoning is anticipated to have relatively minor impacts on environmental quality.
Regardless of zoning district, any wetlands on the site are protected by federal, state and local
regulations. While commercial development is subject to the county's 10-15% native upland plant
community preservation requirement, agricultural uses are exempt from that requirement.
Consequently, the proposed land use amendment will not have significant adverse impacts on
important environmental resources.
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
The following factors indicate that the CG zoning district is appropriate for the subject property:
• The subject property is designated C/I on the County's Future Land Use Plan Map.
• The subject property abuts a major road that is programmed for expansion to accommodate
heavy truck traffic;
• The entire site is within a quarter mile of SR 60; and
• The site is bounded on three sides by commercial zoning. Since the site borders CG zoning
on the north and west, the request is for a continuation of an existing zoning pattern.
auGusT 22, 2000 BE I 4 P6 6 6 2
• -36- 0
The following factors indicate that development of the site under the CG district would be
compatible with surrounding areas:
0 The provisions of the SR 60 Corridor Plan apply to development of the subject property.
Those provisions include special standards regarding screening, landscaping, lighting, signs,
colors, and architectural features.
• The principal impacts of development of the subject property will be on the residentially
designated, but currently undeveloped, land along the south boundary of the subject property.
That land is currently zoned A-1 and consists of citrus groves. The subject property and the
land to the south share a border for ±302 feet. The configuration of the southern parcel
(nearly 20 acres with ±660 feet of road frontage and ±1,300 feet of depth) indicates that, if
necessary, additional buffering can be provided on that site.
• As M-1 designated land bordered by 82nd Avenue and commercial, multiple -family, mobile
home, and agricultural zoning districts, land south of the subject property is likely to be
developed as either a multiple -family project or as a Planned Development. Either of those
development types increases site design flexibility and, therefore, opportunities to buffer or
otherwise increase compatibility with the subject property. In other words, it is unlikely that
single-family residences on large lots will abut the subject property.
For these reasons, staff feels that general commercial development on the subject property would
be compatible with surrounding areas.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the commercial land use designation is intended
for uses such as retail and wholesale trade, offices, business and personal services, residential
treatment centers, limited residential uses, and other similar type uses. In addition, that policy states
that all commercial uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area.
Since the subject property is located within a commercial/industrial node within the county's urban
service area, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 -
As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based on this
analysis, staff determined that the proposed zoning district is consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-37-
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, consistent with the comprehensive
plan, meets all concurrency criteria, and does not adversely impact environmental quality. Most
importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for general commercial uses.
For those reasons, staff supports the request to rezone the subject property to CG.
Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission Recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to CG by adopting the attached
ordinance.
GENERAL
Applicant: Wayne D. Clayton
Iscation: East side of 82nd Avenue, ±250 south of SR 60
Acreagti: ±7.3
Land t Jce Desi a ion: CA, Commercial/Industrial
Existing 7nnin ; CL, Limited Commercial District, and A-1, Agricultural District (up
to 1 unit/5 acres)
Requested Zoning: CG, General Commercial District
Fxisting T. nod I JJ -P; Vacant, wooded
ADJACENT LAND
NhAh: Gas station, convenience store, restaurant; zoned CG, General Commercial District
Smah: Residentially designated (M-1) citrus groves; zoned A-1, Agricultural District
East: Vacant, wooded; zoned CL, Limited Commercial District
West: Truck stop, auto service center, zoned CG, General Commercial District
INFRASTRUCTURE
Water and sewer available; access from 82' Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
10/15% upland preservation requirement; possible
wetland
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Staff Cnntaet: John Wachtel
Date Advertised: August 9, 2000
# of Surrounding Proper Owners Notified:
Date Notification Mailed: August 7, 2000
Date Sign Posted: August 7, 2000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff supports the request
PZC RECOMMENDATION
Approval (7-0)
AUGUST 22, 2000
r- PZC Recommendation
• PZC voted 7 to 0 recommend approval
Criteria Analyzed
• Concurrency
• Comprehensive Plan
• Compatibility
• Environment
Comprehensive Plan
• CommerciaUlndustrial land use designation
• Future LAnd Use Element Policy 1.15
Environmental Impacts
• Federel, state, & local wetland protection reqs
• 10/15% upland preservation
• No additional impacts
AUGUST 22, 2000
-39-
Clayton Rezoning Request
CL, Limited Commercial, & A•1, Agricultural,
to CO. General Commercial
Background
Location
4 f
1z-�yq'�v
I�.y(+^i1f �fnsYyj
south of SR 60
Vamt, wooded
xkill
Nearby uses
j cps
"A
— truck step & am repair
r 2$w
l r.M"
Concurrency
• Potable Water Transportadon
• Wastewater Roeteadoa
• Solid Waste • Stormwater
Management
Compatibility
• Appropriate
— C11 land use designation
— Cd & CL on 3 sides
— 82nd Av. (Citrus Hwy.) & SR 60
• Compatible
— SR 60 Corridor Plan
— Small boundary with residential
— Residential site design Aexi'bility
Recommendation
• Staff & the PZC reccommend that the BCC
approve the request to rezone the subject
property from CL & A-1 to CG.
C'--71
onclusion
• Compatible with surroundins area
• Consistent with the comprehensive plan
• No impacts on public facilities
• No additional environmental impacts
• Staff supports the request
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the project for the Board.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
adopted Ordinance 2000-027 amending the zoning
Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for
±7.3 acres located on the east side of 82°d Avenue,
±250 feet south of SR -60 from CL and A-1 to CG
(Wayne D. Clayton).
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK614PG666
-40- 0
•
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 2 7
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±7.3 ACRES LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF 82m AVENUE, ±250 FEET SOUTH OF SR 60, FROM CL, LRAITED
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5
ACRES), TO CG, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; And
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
The west 10.82 acres of Tract 12, Section 1, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, as same is
designated on the last general plat of lands of The Indian River Farms Company, filed in The
Office of The Clerk of The Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, in Plat Book 2, Page
25; said lands now lying and bing in Indian River County, Florida.
Less and except therefrom: the north 280 feet; and the west 50 feet thereof.
Be changed from CL, Limited Commercial District, and A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5
acres), to CG, General Commercial District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-41-
Olt I 14 PG 667
0
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-0 2 7
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, on this 22ad day of August, 2000.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 9'" day of August, 2000, for a
public hearing to be held on the 22ad day of August, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption
by Commissioner G i n n , seconded by Commissioner T i p p i n , and
adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Fran B. Adams —Aye
Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht A y e
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: Cs:)7Qe2�!- qq noo-a'v�
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
ATTEST Bl� .�.
Jeffrey K. Barton, 1 rk
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins 11, Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Ro ert M. Keating, aF
Community Development Dir for 7
AUGUST 22, 2000
gum RAM=
�rr�,ImWW-Z
-42 0
-
•
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - HOVNANIAN COMPANIES OF
FLORIDA, INC. (GORDON E. NUTT) - CONCEPTUAL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE
AND CONCURRENT PRELIMINARY PD APPROVAL
FOR A 100 -LOT SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO
BE KNOWN AS SEASONS COMMUNITY
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 16, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DN ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Direct r
A•16-
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP
Senior Planner, Current lvelopment
DATE: August 16, 2000
SUBJECT: Hovnanian Companies of Florida, Inc.'s Request for Conceptual Planned
Development (PD) Special Exception Use and Concurrent Preliminary PD Plan
Approval for a 100 Lot Single -Family Development to be known as Seasons
Community
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 22, 2000.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-43- BK 114 PG 669
•
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On behalf of Hovnanian Companies of Florida, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has submitted
an application for special exception uselconceptual PD plan and concurrent preliminary PD plan
approval to construct a 100 lot single-family development located on a 37.20 acre parcel. The
subject property is located at the southeast corner of CR 510 and Jungle Trail and is zoned RM -6,
a zoning district which allows single and multi -family development at a density of up to 6 units per
acre.
• Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of July 13, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-1 to
recommend granting PD conceptual plan and special exception use approval, and to grant
preliminary PD plan/plat approval subject to Board approval of the PD conceptual plan and special
exception use request. While the LDRs require a minimum of 40.6% open space, which includes
some credit for lake area, the Commission's action included an additional approval condition that
the developer document that the project provides 50% green open -space. Please see the Planning
and Zoning Commission minutes (attachment #5). In response to the Planning and Zoning
Commission's open space condition, the applicant has provided staff with a detailed open space
analysis. This is addressed in the open space section of this report.
• PD Project Process
As a PD project, the process involved in review and approval of this proposal is as follows:
Approval Needed Reviewing Body
1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception PZC & BCC
2. Preliminary PD Plan PZC
3. Land Development Permits (LDP) or Waiver Staff
4. Final PD Plat BCC
The applicant is now requesting approval of the first two steps. If the conceptual plantspecial
exception use is approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the preliminary PD approval will
become effective. The applicant will then need to obtain a land development permit or a land
development permit waiver for the required PD infrastructure improvements.
ANALYSIS:
Size of Development: 37.20 acres
Zoning Classifications:
RM -6 Residential Multi -Family (up to 6 units/acre): 34.99 acres
CON -2 Conservation 2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres): 2.21 acres
Total: 37.20 acres
Land Use Designations:
AUGUST 22, 2000
L-2, Low Density 2 (up to 6 units/acre)
C-2, Conservation 2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres)
•
4. Number of Units: Proposed: 100 units
5. Density.— Proposed: 2.70 units/acre
Maximum Allowed: 5.67 units/acre (based on RM -6 & CON -2 zoning)
6. Open Space: Required: 40.6%*
Provided: 54.9%
*Note. The open space requirement is a weighted average of 34.99 acres of RM -6 at 40%
and 2.21 acres of RS -1 at 50% open space.
In response to the Planning and Zoning Commission open space condition, staff had the
applicant provide a detailed green space calculation and exhibit. Initially, the open space
analysis indicated that 49.04% green space was provided, which required the applicant to
make some minor design changes. That information now shows that a minimum of 50%
green space (does not include lake area) will be provided. Including the amount of lake area
creditable for open space under the county's regulations, the project open space is 54.9%.
In the open -space analysis, the project engineer assumed the largest possible home on every
lot and assumed that every lot would be developed to the minimum setbacks allowed in the
PD zoning district. This detailed analysis shows that the project's green space is at the 50%
figure represented to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and is a conservative analysis
that assumes each lot owner builds to his setbacks and occupies the entire building envelope
with development.
7. Recreation Area: Required: 1.2 acres
Provided: 1.53 acres
Note: Recreation facilities will include a clubhouse, pool, and tennis facilities.
8. Stormwater Management: As with standard single-family subdivisions, the proposed
stormwater management plan has been given conceptual approval by the Public Works
Department. Final review and approval of the stormwater management plan will be
accomplished through the land development permit or land development permit waiver
Process.
9. Utilities: The project will be served by county water and sewer. These utility provisions
have been approved by the Department of Utility Services and the Environmental Health
Department.
10. Phasing: The applicant is proposing to build the improvements in a single phase.
11. Traffic Circulation: The project's only permanent vehicular access point will be on CR 510
and align with the entrance for the Old Orchid development to the north. The internal project
road will branch off from the entrance at a traffic circle and then provide access to individual
lots within the development. The internal circulation plan has been reviewed and approved
by the Traffic Engineering Division.
In addition to the permanent access point and in coordination with staff, the applicant is
proposing an emergency access point to Jungle Trail. This emergency access provision is
acceptable to Emergency Services, Public Works, and planning staff. Through the LDP
process, the applicant will need to have the emergency access design approved by
engineering and emergency services. The emergency access point will need to be
constructed and inspected prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for the project.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-45-
BK1I4PG671
•
Consistent with county requirements, the applicant has submitted a traffic impact analysis
(TIA), which has been reviewed and approved by the county's Traffic Engineering Division.
The TIA indicated that the only off-site traffic improvement required by the applicant is an
east bound right -tum lane on CR 510 at the project entrance. The proposed plans depict this
tum lane improvement, which will need to be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate
of completion for the project.
12. Proposed PD Waivers: Through the PD process, the applicant has requested the following
waivers. The proposed waivers are compared with RM -6 zoning district standards or
appropriate LDR criteria. The proposed waivers are as follows:
W A I V E R S
DESCRIPTION
RM -6 CRITERIA (for lots)
PROPOSED CRITERIA
Lot Size
7,000
7,600 sq. ft.
Lot Width
70'
65' north perimeter'
60' remaining lots
Frontyard Setback
25'
20' interior lots2
15' certain comer lots
Rearyard Setback
25'
10, q,3
Sideyard Setback
10'
7.5' north perimeter lots"
5' remaining lots
Pool Setback Rearyard
10'
57107156
Decks and Screen Enclosures
5'
275', 10715i6
Minimum Openspace per Lot
40%
20%
Right -of -Way Width
50'
40'
Building Coverage Per Lot
30%
23% to 57.3%7
Note: RM -6 zoned sites may be site planned for attached units with "U" separation oetween units
at a density of up to 6 units/acre. Also, note that although the minimum open space
allowance is reduced on individual lots, overall project open space will be 54.% (more than
the required 40.6%).
1 For lots along the north property line, the minimum width will be 65'; for all remaining lots, the
minimum width will be W.
2 For corner lots, the setback for the frontyard with the greatest frontage is reduced to 15'.
3 For the north, east and south perimeter lots (6-52), the rearyard setback will be 25' for principal
structures. Interior lots will ha%e a 10' rearyard setback for all principal structures. _ There are no
proposed rear yards along Jungle Trail.
For the lots along the north perimeter (lots 6-18). the sidevard setback will be 75. For all other lots
in the project, the sideyard setback will be 5'. The sideyard setbacks along the west property line will
be 5' in addition to the 30' Jungle Trail buffer.
s The rearyard pool setback for all interior lots (1-5 and 53-100) will be 5% for all perimeter lots except
the north perimeter lots (19-52), the rearyard pool setback will be 10', and for the -north perimeter lots
(6-18), the rearyard pool setback will be 15'.
AUGUST 22, 2000
I
•
The rearyard setback for decks and screen enclosures for all interior lots (1-5 and 53-100) will be 2':
for all perimeter lots except the north perimeter lots (19-52), the rearyard setback will be 10' for
screen enclosures, and 5' for decks, and for the north perimeter lots (6-18), the rearyard setback will
be 15' for decks and screen enclosures.
Lot coverage ranges from 57.3% for the largest model on the smallest lot to 23% for the largest model
on the largest lot.
13. Environmental Issues:
Uplands: Since the site is over 5 acres, it is subject to the native upland setaside
criteria of section 929.05. However, environmental planning staff has verified that
most of upland area land is citrus, with only a small amount of native vegetation
along Jungle Trail. The native vegetation along Jungle Trail does not constitute a
native community since it is heavily mixed with nuisance exotics. Therefore, no
native upland community exists, and no setaside is required.
Wetlands: A total of 5.61 acres of the 37.2 acres project site is wetland area. There
are two different types of wetlands on the subject site; estuarine wetlands and
palustrine wetlands (freshwater non -tidal). The estuarine wetland is 2.21 acres in
size and characterized by mangrove growth. The applicant is not proposing to impact
the mangrove wetland area. The applicant is, however, proposing to impact
approximately 3.40 acres of the freshwater wetland and mitigate that impact by
wetland creation, wetland enhancement, wetland/upland buffer creation, and a
conservation easement. The mitigation will be approved through the wetland
permitting process with the St. John's River Water Management District and Indian
River County. Any required conservation easement will need to be granted prior to
or via the final plat.
14. Archeological Issues: The county's Archeological Survey lists the project area as having a
high potential for archeological resources; therefore, staff required the applicant to conduct
an archeological investigation and prepare a site specific archeological report for the site. The
applicant had such a report prepared and the report revealed the presence of a substantial
midden. The findings of the report have been reviewed by the county's Historical Resources
Advisory Committee (HRAC). The minutes of the committee meeting are attached to the
staff s report.
As a result of its review, the HRAC has recommended that:
a. An archaeologist be required to be on site during the course of horizontal
construction, and that a Phase III investigation be conducted in those resource
area that will be disturbed and inaccessible in the future.
b. A permanent "display" be required to be developed by the applicant to
display artifacts recovered on site, educate the residents of the development
on the archeological resources, and to provide for limited public access to the
resources. This "display" needs to be reviewed by the HRAC, and the
applicant needs to make artifacts available to the county for future display.
HRAC also recommended that county staff coordinate with the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) concerning the project. Staff has contacted SHPO staff, and SHPO is
satisfied with HRAC's recommendations. The SHPO is also a commenting agency on St.
John's River Water Management District and Army Corps of Engineers permits associated
with the project and therefore will have input with those agencies before wetland alteration
permits are issued.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-47-
6K 9 9 4 PG 673
•
To ensure proper treatment of archeological resources, staff and the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend that conditions a and b be trade a condition of the PD special
exception use approval. To that end, the recommendation at the end of this report contains
these conditions.
15. Jungle Trail: The site's western boundary fronts Jungle Trail, a county designated "scenic
and historic" road. Along the northern sections of the site's Jungle Trail buffer, the applicant
proposes to remove Australian Pines, preserve all existing cabbage palms and replant the
buffer with understory material. A 6' high black vinyl clad chain link fence will be installed
in the outer 10' of the 30' buffer area (in the upland portion of the buffer area). The center
section of the site's Jungle Trail frontage is an estuarine wetland area, which will be
preserved. Along the site's southern Jungle Trail boundary, there is no existing native
vegetation and all the existing material (non-native)wW be removed and replaced by native
upland vegetation. In addition, a 6' high black vinyl clad chain link fence will be installed
along the outer 10' of the 30' buffer. The Jungle Trail planting plan has been reviewed by the
county's environmental planning staff and has been determined to be in and compliance with
the Jungle Trail management plan.
16. Buffers & Setbacks:
North Perimeter. The applicant is constructing a 6' high masonry wall with a Type "C"
buffer planted on the CR510 side of the wall. The homes will be set back 40 feet from the
CR 510 ultimate right-of-way line.
West Perimeter: A 30' Jungle Trail buffer is proposed as described in the Jungle Trail buffer
section. There will be only 3 homes within the project adjacent to the buffer. The buffering
will be as described in the Jungle Trail buffer section (above).
South and East Perimeters: The applicant is proposing a Type "C" buffer along the south and
east perimeters as a compatibility measure to buffer against the proposed 60' wide lots. The
Type "C" buffer is consistent with PD ordinance requirements and is acceptable to staff,
since the south perimeter is adjacent to Bermuda Club multi -family buildings and the east
side is adjacent to the Disney Resort.
17. Dedications and Improvements:
CR 510 Turn Lane: As indicated in the traffic impact analysis, an east bound right -tum lane
on CR 510 is required at the project entrance. The tutu lane is shown on the PD plans and
will need to be constructed and inspected prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion.
External Sidewalk The county's sidewalk and bikeway plan requires an 8' wide pedestrian
path along the site's CR 510 frontage. The sidewalk is shown on the PD plans and will need
to be built or bonded out prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion.
Ultimate Right -of -Way for CR 510. The county's Thoroughfare Plan designates CR 510 as
a major collector roadway which requires 160' of right-of-way. Since there is 80' of right-of-
way existing, an additional 80' of the right-of-way is needed and 40' of right-of-way from this
property is necessary as its fair share portion of the necessary additional 80'. The applicant's
Plans accommodate an acquisition of the additional 40' by the county. The right-of-way will
be acquired outside of the development approval process.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 114 PG 674
Internal Pedestrian System: An intemal pedestrian system is required for planned
developments. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk system along one side of the internal
roads, and this is acceptable to staff. This sidewalk system will need to be built or bonded
out prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion.
Emergency Access: As referenced in the traffic section of this report, an emergency access
connection to Jungle Trail is required. The final engineering design for this access will need
to be approved by Emergency Services and Engineering prior to the issuance of an LDP. The
connection will need to be built and approved by Emergency Services and Engineering prior
to the issuance of a certificate of completion.
Wabasso Corridor. The site is located within the Wabasso Corridor and must comply with
the Wabasso Corridor Plan criteria. The proposed plan meets the CR 510 buffer
requirements of the Wabasso Corridor Plan and the recently adopted Wabasso Corridor Plan
East buffer criteria. Any project entry feature and guardhouse will be subject to the recently
adopted Wabasso Corridor Plan CR 510 East criteria.
18. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: CR 510, Old Orchid PD, Oceanaire Heights/PD, RT -6
South: Bermuda Club/RM-6
East: Disney Resor" -6
West: Jungle Trail, Grove/A-1
RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special
exception use and conceptual PD plan approval, and approve the requested waivers, with the
following conditions:
1. That prior to the issuance of a land development permit:
a. The applicant must obtain approval from Emergency Services and
Engineering for the final design of the emergency access to Jungle Trail, and
b. The applicant shall obtain the necessary county and jurisdictional permits
required for the wetland impacts, and
C. The applicant shall provide a plan for display and presentation of
archeological resources onsite and for making the artifacts available for
public display and shall obtain HRAC approval for said display.
2. That an archaeologist be onsite during the construction process.
3. That prior to issuance of a certificate of completion for the project:
a. All required improvements identified in section 17 (dedications and
improvements) of this staff report shall be complete, and
b. All required buffers shall be complete.
4. That prior to or via the final plat, a conservation easement shall be established for the
preserved wetlands area, as depicted on the PD plans.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-49-
BK 114 PG 675
r
c
TOWN OF
ORCHID
1.17 AC
11.21 AC
Omm 00000
mm AZ 00001.0
GOV. LOT 4
MI CHAELA-1
CREED' to
20.0 AC
t ,
fog
AC 00=.
owow
PD a RT -6 0
GOV. LOT 5 4 !
- —��NTI R4CO SA TAE iYaTERFY�}' moon
000Oo
SPOIL'
ISLAND �
No. 22jok d
27D7 At
RM -6
AS -6
CN
C.R. 510 *m ■ m
mom
o
W AD
FLORDA REACH RESORT SUB
PAd H -A
FOB= c
RM -6 --a
GOV. LOT 2
GOV. LOT 6
OAKS I RIPER HOMES
so
0.2
,o
-R
C7
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project for the Board with particular
emphasis on the buffering plans for Jungle Trail, the proposed additional emergency entrance
on Jungle Trail, and the buffering on CR -510.
Discussion then ensued regarding the archeology requirements for the project, and
Commissioner Stanbridge directed staff to add to their Condition 2 the requirement that the
archeologist be present during all horizontal and/or vertical construction.
Commissioner Macht also requested a provision that all recovered artifacts be turned
over to the Historical Society. He asked Commissioner Stanbridge if the Historical Society
would accept those artifacts for care, and Commissioner Stanbridge responded that they
would.
Discussion followed regarding the artifacts that are to be displayed by the applicant
and whether or not such displays would be available to the general public. Director Boling
responded that the displays would be available to the general public if they would be allowed
through the gate to the project.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Lynn Kiefer with Kimley-Horn clarified that the northern part of the Jungle Trail
buffer zone is already densely vegetated but any gaps could be filled in. They are proposing
to remove Brazilian peppers and Australian pines and plant all native vegetation.
Chairman Adams then questioned whether the drainage ditch will be maintained, and
Ms. Kiefer responded that it would.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-51-
BK 114 PG 677
Jonathan Rapaport with Hovnanian Co. then showed some architectural drawings
of the proposed project.
Chairman Adams questioned the size of the lake, and Mr. Rapaport responded that
the lake will cover 2 acres.
Commissioner Ginn wanted to be certain that the homeowners will be aware that the
lake is a stormwater lake and questioned how the lake will be treated.
Mr. Rapaport replied that the homeowners' documents for the project will specify
how the lake is to be cared for. He then focused discussion on the height requirements for
the gatehouse and presented several differing views illustrating cupolas, overhangs and roof
features at different heights from the maximum hoped for at 22 -feet through the required 20 -
foot height.
Director Keating explained that the building permit for this gatehouse was applied for
subsequent to the adoption of the Wabasso Corridor East Plan requirements about one month
ago.
After discussion, Chairman Adams noted that the applicant would have to go through
a variance application process in order to raise the height of that roof, and Commissioner
Macht comments that is a very expensive process just to include a cupola.
CONSENSUS was reached to direct staff to bring back recommendations regarding
cupolas and other similar items in order that the LDRs might be clarified as to these items.
Ray Puzzitiello with Hovnanian Co. noted that the existing ditch on the north portion
of Jungle Trail takes water from CR -5 10, which then flows through their property and out
to the river. County staff had requested that the ditch be left alone so all plants are being put
behind the ditch. It is 40' from their property to Jungle Trail on the north side. There is no
drainage ditch on the south side and Jungle Trail is 20' from their property line.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-52-
4
-I
0
After a request from County Attorney Bangel for copies of documents being used to
illustrate plantings and buffers, discussion ensued regarding documentation submitted to staff
that was not in the backup materials presented to the Board.
Director Boling assured the Board that they would receive copies of everything
presented to staff and Commissioner Ginn requested a continuance of the public hearing
until the Board has had a chance to examine all the documentation.
MOTION WAS made by Commissioner Ginn,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, that the
Board continue the public hearing until September
12, 2000.
Commissioner Tippin did not feel a necessity to continue the hearing and felt the
backup had contained sufficient information.
THE CHAHWAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner
Tippin opposed).
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 114 PG 679
-53-
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2000-028 AMENDING
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs):
CHAPTER 911, ZONING (FREE-STANDING SIGNS
NEAR I-95 IN THE SR -60 CORRIDOR)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
W/
Robert M. Keating, AIC
Community Development Direc r
%.6
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: August 15, 2000
SUBJECT: LDR Amendment Follow-up Hearing: Free-standing Signs Near I-95 in the SR
60 Corridor
It is requested the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting on August 22, 2000.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
At its July 18, 2000 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners considered 5 land development
regulation (LDR) amendment ordinances that address various topics, and granted final approval and
adoption of 4 LDR ordinances. However, final action was not taken on the ordinance regarding free-
standing signs near I-95 in the SR 60 corridor. Rather, the Board voted 4-1 to approve as an interim
measure (pending ordinance) one of the three alternative free-standing sign ordinances discussed at
the July 18' meeting and directed staff to draft specific landscaping requirements for areas around
the sign and sign pole bases of taller free-standing signs (see attachment #1).
Staff has now drafted such specifications, prepared two alternative ordinances, and has advertized
and scheduled a public hearing for final action at the Board's August 22, 2000 meeting. The Board
is now to consider the revised, alternative ordinances and is to adopt one of the alternatives with or
without modification.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-54-
ANALYSIS:
Consideration of an LDR amendment regarding free-standing signs near I-95 was the result of a
request filed by Attorney Bruce Barkett on behalf of Paradise Petroleum, Inc. At the July 18' Board
meeting, staff reported that the SR 60 Task Force, Professional Services Advisory Committee
(PSAC), Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC), and staff agreed with the petitioner that a change
to the LDRs is warranted to create a transition between 50' tall 300 sq. ft. signs near I-95 and 10' tall
50 sq. ft. signs for sites located more than 1,000' from the I-95 ramps. At that meeting, the Board
was presented with ordinance options to allow taller and larger free-standing signs on sites located
from 1,000' to 2,000' of the 1-95 ramps. The Board agreed that a transition was needed, and
determined that the ordinance needs specific landscaping standards to ensure that the sign and sign
pole bases for taller free-standing signs (i.e. signs over 10' tall) would be fully or partially screened
from view of the adjacent roadway.
Staff has prepared two alternative ordinances, each containing the same landscaping standards for
screening the sign and sign pole bases of taller signs. The "Option A" ordinance follows staffs July
181 recommendation to establish a single transition "zone" by allowing signs up to 20' tall and 100
sq. ft. in area on sites located between 1,000' and 2,000' from the I-95 ramps. The "Option B"
ordinance follows the SR 60 Task Force's July 18'h recommendation to establish two transition
"zones" by allowing 20' tall/100 sq. ft. signs in the 1,000' to 1,500' area and 15' tall/75 sq. ft. signs
in the 1,500' to 2,000' area. Both proposed ordinances include graphics that would be included in
the actual LDR code.
In regard to landscaping standards, staff has drafted standards that are contained in each ordinance
option and propose the following:
Signs over 20' tall (20' to 50' tall, on sites within 1,000' of I-95 ramps)
Screen the sign base and sign pole base from view of the adjacent roadway by
planting around the base:
• 3 Canopy trees
• 3 Understory Trees
• Continuous Hedge 4' High at Planting
Signs over 10' tall and less than 20' tall (from 1,000' to 2,000' of I-95 ramps)
Screen the sign base and sign pole base from view of the adjacent roadway by
planting around the base:
• 3 Understory Trees
• Continuous Hedge 3' High at Planting
It should be noted that the existing SR 60 and Chapter 926 landscaping regulations require that
canopy trees have a planting a minimum height of 12' and minimum spread of 6', and require that
understory trees have at planting a minimum height of 5'. Also, it should be noted that 100 sq. ft.
of green area with a minimum dimension of 10' is required for each canopy tree, per existing Chapter
926 requirements.
The proposed landscape specifications are designed to ensure low to mid-level screening of sign and
sign pole bases for signs 10' to 20' tall and to ensure low, mid-level, and higher-level screening of
sign pole bases for signs 20' to 50' tall.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the "Option A" ordinance for free-
standing signs near I-95 in the SR 60 corridor.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-55-
y
Planning Director Stan Boling presented 2 proposed ordinances for the Board's
consideration, one containing the staff recommendation and one containing the Task Force
recommendation.
Chairman Adams stated that she continued to like Option A which was staff's
recommendation.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ginn still preferred Option B, the Task Force's recommendation.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn opposed)
adopted Option A for Ordinance 2000-028 amending
the Land Development Regulations (LDRs): Chapter
911, Zoning (Free-standing Signs Near I-95 in the
SR -60 Corridor), with the addition of language to
allow signs over 20 feet in height with a 3 -foot
hedge.
auGusT 22, 2000 BK1 I4 pG 682
-56-
ORDINANCE NO. 2000--L2 8
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 911,
ZONING; AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS) BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
1. LOB zoning Chapter Section 911.19(10)(e) is hereby amended as follows:
(e) Reduction in sign sizes and dimensions: Modifications to Table 1 (freestanding signs)
and Table 2 (wall signs), Schedule of Regulations for Permanent Signs Requiring
Permits, sign ordinance.
1. Freestanding signs:
Maximum cumulative signage: Reduce to fifty (50) percent of what
is allowed in Table 1, except for I-95 signs as described in iii, below.
ii. Maximum signage on a single face: Reduce to fifty (50)
percent of what is allowed in Table 1, except for I-95 signs as
described in iii, below.
iii Maximum height. Reduce to thirty (30) percent of what is
allowed in Table 1, but no less than six (6) feet and no greater
than ten (10) feet. Maximum height and size modifications do
not apply to properties located within one thousand (1,000)
feet of I-95 entrance or exit ramps where an applicant
demonstrates that a taller proposed sign is oriented so as to be
seen by I-95 motorists approaching the SR 60 interchange.
For properties located between 1.000 feet and 2.000 feet of I-
95 entrance or exit ramps. a maximum sign height of 20 feet
and a maximum sign area of 100 square feet shall be allowed.
Any pole for such a sign shall be colored dark bronze, black,
or dark green. All other special restrictions and prohibitions
shall apply.
Coding: Wards in MOAw dw&agh type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-57-
BK 114 PG 683
n
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-q2 8
a. Sign base and si1M Dole base landscanmg for signs allowed
to exceed 20 feet in height. sign bases and sign pole bases
shall be screened from view of the adjacent roadway with a
minimum of three (3) canopy trees three (3) understory trees.
and a continuous heti eg_having a height at planting of at least
3 feet above grade. For signs allowed to exceed 10 feet in
height but limited to a height of 20 feet, sign bases and sign
pole bases shall be screened from view of the adjacent
roadway with a minimum of three (3) understo1y trees and a
continuous hedge having, a height at planting of at least 3 feet
above grade (See Figures F-14 and F-15 at the end of section
911,19).
iv. For development involving sites of forty (40) acres or more
the ten (10) feet sign height requirement may be waived by
the Board of County Commissioners if the development
project applicant prepares and the &lard of County
Commissioners approves a sign package that reduces the total
sign area otherwise allowed under the corridor plan and sign
ordinance by ten (10) percent or more. Outparcels on larger
sites shall comply with the six (6) feet to ten (10) feet height
limitations specified above.
V. Required setbacks from property lines or right-of-way: One
(1) foot subject to satisfaction of sight distance requirements.
vi. Number of allowable signs per street frontage: No change
from Table 1, Footnote #2 of Table 1 shall be modified,
requiring a minimum of two hundred (200) feet of separation
between signs along the same street frontage.
2. LDR zoning Chapter Section 911.19(10)(h)l.i is hereby amended as follows.
1. Freestanding signage:
All freestanding signs iestricted to a maximum height of no more than 10 feet
shall be of a wide -based monument style. Pole signs are discouraged, but
may be permitted when the supporting structures are completely screened
from view with landscaping or berm features. Said landscaping and/or
berming shall cover and screen the entire area beneath the sign at time of
certificate of occupancy (C.O.) issuance.
Coding: words in she-dweeo type are deletions from existing law. wards underfin are additions.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-58-
1.1
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 028
3. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are he
repealed to the extent of such conflict. All Special Acts of the legislature applying only treby
o the
unincorporated portion of Indian River County which conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
4. CODIFICATION
The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the County Code and the word
Ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of
this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions.
S. SEVERABILITY
If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such
Portions hereof and it shall holdings shall not affect the remaining
be construed to have been the legislative intent to pass this ordinance
without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part.
6. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Secretary of State.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 5th ,
, 2000, for a public hearing held on the 181 day of July 2000, and was advertised m
day of
the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the _ day o f A u o u s t , 2000, for a public hearing to be
held on the 220d day of August 2000. at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner 4 tom; Bonded by Commissioner M a c h t
and adopted by the following vote;
The ordinance was adopted by a vote of :
Chairman Fran B. Adams
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner John W. Tippin
---4Lp
Nay
Aye
Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
AUGUST 22, 2000
-59-
I
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 2 8
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 2 2nd day of
August ,2000.
Attest: J.K. Barton, Cle
B
Deputy Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Filed with the Florida Department of State on the qday of , 2000.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development ire ;t/ 7
AUGUST 22, 2000 6 8 6
•
0
I
AUGUST 22, 2000
20' Tall
100 Sq.
Ft. 10' Tall
rMFM
0-1,000 1,000-29000 2,000+ (Rest
feet feet of corridor)
F-14
PA RK ING
B U F F E R
Sign/ PoleHedge
Base O O N%"%.
Canopy Tree
vv O Understory Tree
Property Line
Roadway
Sample Landscape Layout
F-15
-61-
GK 114 PG 687
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2000-088
CONFIRMING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN
CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO
28" AVENUE (NORTH OF 4" STREET) (PROJECT NO.
UW -99 -06 -DS) -
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 11, 2000:
DATE: AUGUST 11, 2000
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADNM41STRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. I
DIRECTOR OF U UXrY
PREPARED JAMES D.
AND STAFFED MANAGER O OL
PROJECTS
BY. DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: 28 TH AVENUE ( NORTH OF 4'HM PETITION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW 994)&DS
RESOLUTION III PUBLIC HEARING
BACKGROUND
On August 1, 2000, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved
Resolution I (2000-080), and Resolution Il (2000-081). Resolution I contained the preliminary
assessment roll describing the project and cost. Resolution II set the date of the public hearing for
the subject project Property owners have been notified of the public hearing by mail. Resolution I
(2000-080) was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal on August 5, 2000. (See attached
agenda item and minutes of the above meeting - EXHIBIT 1, Plat Map MMIT 2, -Estimated
Project Cost and Preliminary Assessment Roll EXHIBIT'S 3& 4)
AUGUST 22, 2000
-62-
ANALYSIS
There are 6 non- platted residential lots, which may benefit from this proposed water line on 2e
Avenue. The petition has been signed by four of the owners (67%). The properties are from 0.23
acre to 0.42 of an acre. Due to lake and wetland areas, which reduce the usable land areas, staff has
made adjustments to the square footages proposed for assessment, to the 4 properties along the west
side and north of 28' Avenue. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment
project. The 2 lots abutting 4th Street were provided service in the Phase I Water Project, which
was completed on January 12,1993 and are not included. ( see attached EXHIBIT 2- Plat Map).
Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan states, "The County's water system shall be expanded
to supply the potable water needs of the eastern half of the County during the period 1986-
2005."(See attached EXHIBIT 5, page 4 of the Potable Water Sub -element, and page 22 of the
Sanitary Sewer Sub -element).
Twenty Eighth Avenue is a private street, and the owners have provided the County with the
necessary utility easement Design of the water distribution system is complete and has been
provided by staff. An evening informational meeting was held, for the benefit of the property
owners on August 9, 2000.
Approval of the attached Resolution III will confirm and approve the preliminary assessment The
attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project The total estimated project
cost and amount to be assessed, including engineering and administration is $ 18,795.00. The
estimated cost per square foot is S 0.256861 (rounded),(See attached Estimated Project Cost -and
Assessment Roll -EXHIBITS 3 & 4). This project is to be paid through the assessment of property
owners along the proposed water line route. In the interim, financing will be from the Assessment
Fund No. 473-000-169-372.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached Resolution III, which affirms the preliminary assessment roll
on the subject property.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-63-
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-088
confirming the special assessments in connection
with a water main extension to 28'h Avenue (north of
4' Street - Project No. UW -99 -06 -DS).
Public Hearing (Third Reso.)
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-088
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CONFIRMING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN
CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO
28TH AVENUE (NORTH OF 4TH STREET); PROVIDING FOR
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS TO BE MADE OF
RECORD.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 2000-080, adopted August 1, 2000, determined to make special
assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to the
area of 28"' Avenue north of 4t' Street; and
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which said special
assessments shall be made and how said special assessments are to be paid; and
WHEREAS, the resolution was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal, as
required by Section 206.04, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed
Resolution No. 2000-081 on August 1, 2000, and set a time and place for a public
hearing at which the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested
persons would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said
project and said special assessments, and for the Board to act as required by Section
206.07, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in
the Press Journal Newspaper on Friday, August 4, 2000, and once again on Friday,
August 11, 2000 (twice one week apart; the last being at least one week prior to the
hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at least ten days prior
to the hearing, as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 0 I 4 PG 690
0
-64-
I.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County on
Tuesday, August 22, 2000, at 9:05 a.m. conducted the public hearing with regard to
the special assessments;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1.. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and rated in their entirety.
2. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are hereby
confirmed and approved, and shall remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against
the properties assessed until paid in full.
3. The Board finds that the properties assessed by this resolution will receive special
benefits equal to or greater than the cost of the assessment.
4. The County will record the special assessments and this resolution, which describes
the properties assessed and the amounts of the special assessments, on the public
records, which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special
assessments.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner G i n n , and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner S t a n h r i d g e , and, upon being put
to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn A v e
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Ave
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
22nd day of August, 2000.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest: J. K. Barton2)txj.1=
Cl� 04G_,q
Fran B. Adams
Deputy CI Chairman
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
(to be recorded on Public Records)
AUGUST 22, 2000
-65-
6K 114 PG 691
•
PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00019.1 SQ. FT. 13,068 ASSESSMENT 3,358.85
OWNER GANCHER, SUSAN M
455 28TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-2034
LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8, RUN
W ON N LINE OF SAID TR 8, 25 FT TO W R/W LINE OF EMERSON
AVE. TH S ON W RNV 995 FT. TH W 555 FT TO POB TH W 60 FT.
TH N S FT. TH W 73 FT. TH N 150 FT. TH E 73 FT. TH S 15 FT. TH E
15 FT. THS11 FT. THE25FT. THS35FT, THE20FT, THS94FT
TO POB (OR BK 625 PP 2829 )
PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00019.2 SQ. FT. 13,068 ASSESSMENT 3,358.65
OWNER SEERAM, RABINDRANAUTH E & JANET
465 28TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968.2034
LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W
ON N LINE OF TR 8, 25 FT TO W RNV LINE OF EMERSON AVE. TH
S 990 FT. TH W 815 FT. TH W 73 FT TO POB. TH N 100 Fr. TH W
112 FT. TH S 100 FT, TH W 15 FT, TH S 55 FT, TH E 87 FT, TH N
55 FT, TH E 40 FT TO POB (OR SK 656 PP 681)
PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00020.0 SQ. FT. 13,068 ASSESSMENT 3,356.65
OWNER JETTE, LEON J & ALMA P.
445 28TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-2034
LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W
ON N BNDRY LINE OF SAID TR 8 25 FT TO W RNV UNE OF EMER-
SON
MERSON AVE TH S ON W RNV UNE OF EMERSON AVE 990 FT RUN
W 615 FT TO POB. RUN W 113 FT RUN S 55 FT RUN W 37 FT RUN
RUN S 42 FT RUN ELY TO PT 100 FT S OF POB RUN N 100 FT TO
POB. AS R SK 83 PP 190
PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00021.0 SQ. FT. 13,088 ASSESSMENT 3,358.65
OWNER COLUMBARO, RAY
425 28TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-2034
LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W
ON N BNDRY LINE OF SAID TR 8 25 FT TO W RNV LINE OF EMER-
SON
MERSON AVE TH S ON W RNV UNE OF EMERSON AVE 990 FT RUN
W 615 FT RUN S 110 FT TO POB RUN W 150 FT RUN S 100 FT
THENCE RUN E 150 FT THENCE RUN N 100 FT TO POB AS IN R
BK 42, PP 421. LESS SLY 10 FT & ALSO FROM NE COR OF TR 8
RUN W ON N UNE OF SAID TR 25 FT TO R/W UNE OF EMERSON
AVE THENCE RUN S 990 FT RUN W 615 FT S 100 FT TO POB.
THENCE RUN W 150 FT RUN S 13 FT RUN ELY 150 FT MORE OR
LESS TO PT 10 FT S OF POB. RUN N 1 FT TO POB. AS IN R BK
67. PP 20
AUGUST 22, 2000
EXHIBIT 4
IK 114 PG 692
•
I
5 33 39 00001 00 0 00025.0 SQ. FT. 10,010 ASSESSMENT 2,571.17
PARCEL 9 1
OWNER LEGGETT, DORO C. COOK
1932 28TH AVE
VERO BEACH. FL 32980
LEGAL IND RIV FARMS C O SUB PBS 225 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W
ON N BNDRY LIN
OF SAID TR 8 25 FT TO W Rf W LINE OF EMER-
SON AVE TH S R JA S ON W W UNE 1100 FT RUN W 480 FT TO
POB. RUN W I IC
FT RUN S 100 FT RUN E 110 FT RUN N 100 FT
TO POB. AS IN D
SK 110 PP 30, LESS PARCEL AS DESC IN R BK
179 PP 128 (OR
BK 387-488, 449-824)
PARCEL * 15 33 39 00001 CH
180 00028.0 SQ. FT. 10,890 ASSESSMENT 2.79721
OWNER SENNETT, DAVI
N. & PATRICIA A.
435 27TH DR
VERO BEACH, F
32980
W
LEGAL IND RIV FARMS
ON N LINE OF SLQD
O SUB PBS 225 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN
TR 8 25 FT TO W RNV LINE OF EMER-
MERSON
SONAVE TH R
S ON SAID RNV UNE OF EMERSON AVE 995 FT .
RUN W 480 FT
O POB. RUN W 110 FT RUN S 99 FT RUNE 110 FT
THENCE RUN N !9 FT TO POB. AS IN R BK 118, PP540
TOTAL SQU
FOOTAGE 73,172
TOTAL ESTIMA
AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $18,795.00
7-14.2000
J.D.C.
28THAV1
AUGUST 22,
Sfl
ou I 14 PG 693
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF 6¢ LOCAL
OPTION GAS TAX REVENUE DISTRIBUTION
FORMULA - (TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES;
TOWN OF ORCHID; CITY OF FELLSMERE, CITY OF
SEBASTIAN; AND CITY OF VERO BEACHI
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 14, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director =�
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider 64, Local Option Gas
Tax (LOGT) Revenue Distribution Formula
DATE: August 14, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
As required by Chapter 209 of the Indian River County Code, the
"method of distribution of the local option gas tax revenue
shall be reviewed and a public hearing held at least every two
years by the Parties to the Agreementp (which include the County
and all five municipalities). To accomplish this requirement,
staff has contacted the City Managers of all five municipalities
for the purpose of collecting gas tax distribution formula data
and informing them of the hearing. All municipalities have
submitted current formula data.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Staff has inserted all recent data into the three parameter LOGT
formula. (see attached chart) Distribution percentages change
slightly.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-68- 0
•
RECOMMM TIONS AND FUNDING
Unless contrary input is received at the Public Hearing, staff
recommends that the Board retain the current LOGT distribution
formula. The new distribution percentages as shown on the 2000
LOGT chart shall be sent to the state for FY01/02 Fiscal Year.
Letters to five municipalities with chart attached.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Rich Stringer, City of Sebastian, believed that the County Code calls for an annual
calculation rather than every 2 years and felt that would be more equitable because of the
rapid growth taking place in North County.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Director Davis explained that the lag is caused by the difference between the County
and the State fiscal years which do not coincide.
County Attorney Bangel stated the Code provision does not really specify except that
it calls for an effective date on September V of every year.
Staff was directed to research the problem and advise the Board.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously retained the current LOGT distribution
formula with the new distribution percentages as
shown on the 2000 LOGT Chart, as recommended
by staff.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-69- BK 1IPG695
96/97 $ 11,892,662 $ 2,239,959 $ 899,467 $ 2,699,028 No figures $ 89,574
' 95/96 $11,609,464 $ 2,562,782 $ 331,504 $ 2,431,201 $ 69,458
94/95 $12,105,310
$ 3,246,093
$ 238,733
$ 2,128,824
$111,405
Sub -Total $71,122,175
$12,754,239
$3,249,112
$13,988,438
$0
$ 364,006
$101,477,97r
Average 70.08%
12.57%
3.20%
13.79%
1-3
.36%
1000/0
POPULATION (1999) 70,425
17,907
2,600
N
N
150
2,790
109,579
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
POPULATION % 64.27%
16.340/a
2.370/6
14.33%
0.140/6
LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX DISTRIBUTION FORMULA
100 %
N
O
APRIL, 2000
O
O
ITEM
INDIAN RIVER
VERO BEACH
FELLSMERE SEBASTIAN
ORCHID
INDIAN RIVER TOTAL
1.060/a
1000/0
COUNTY
(PROPOSED FOR 2001)
SHORES
# Lane Miles
1347.46
244.1
54 287.4
0
5.72
13.0650%
# Bridges
78
$
0 5
0
0
Equiv. Lane
1503.46
260.1
54 297.4
0
5.72 2120.69
70.9(r
12.26%
2.55% 14.02%
0.000/0
00.27% 100%
Transportation Expenditures
98/99
$18,700,809
$ 2,593,326
$ 780,932 $ 4,764,437
$ 53,761
97/98
$ 16,813,930
$ 2,112,079
S 998,476 $ 1,964,948
$ 39,808
96/97 $ 11,892,662 $ 2,239,959 $ 899,467 $ 2,699,028 No figures $ 89,574
' 95/96 $11,609,464 $ 2,562,782 $ 331,504 $ 2,431,201 $ 69,458
`9
0
94/95 $12,105,310
$ 3,246,093
$ 238,733
$ 2,128,824
$111,405
Sub -Total $71,122,175
$12,754,239
$3,249,112
$13,988,438
$0
$ 364,006
$101,477,97r
Average 70.08%
12.57%
3.20%
13.79%
00/0
.36%
1000/0
POPULATION (1999) 70,425
17,907
2,600
15,707
150
2,790
109,579
..w.
POPULATION % 64.27%
16.340/a
2.370/6
14.33%
0.140/6
2.55%
100 %
Equiv. Lane =(#Lane Mi1es)+(2x#Bridges)
REVENUE PERCENTAGE 68.41%
13.72%
2.71%
14.05%
0.05%
1.060/a
1000/0
C')
(PROPOSED FOR 2001)
cn
EXISTING PERCENTAGE 67.93%
15.5350%
2.3567%
13.0650%
0.0100%
1.1033%
100%
UD
(1999.2000)
`9
0
0
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TOMMY MCDOUGALD -
QUEST TO SPEAK ON HARASSMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2000:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Margaret Gunter
FROM: Fran B. Adams, Chairman
DATE: August 15, 2000
Under Public Discussion Items, Mr. Tommy McDougald has
requested to speak on Harassment.
Tommy McDougald, Post Office Box 655, Vero Beach, believed that he is being
harassed by law enforcement and stated that he has made a tape of things he knows. The
tape has been sent to the Attorney General and he has kept copies. He had respect for each
and every Commissioner but felt that things were occurring which were not being brought
to their attention.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-71-
1 14 PG 697
I
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY -
REQUEST TO SPEAK ON SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
WITH STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, REGARDING
SUBMISSION OF A MANAGEMENT PLAN BY THE
COUNTY (NORTH COUNTY PARK
The Board reviewed letters of June 9, 2000 and August 15, 2000:
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
susm
V.�
NAAI000 80FFFR PBESRMSEM
FRVE D8
�r.e.'cnr HL 3Y9�0-YB31
�e7 — 9s3 —soo�F June 9, 2000
TO: Kei* Fisher
FROM: Ellen Stere
SUBJECT. Subbase to ht River County
Attached is a copy of the executed sublease to Indian Riva County (appi'ax. 122 acres) for the
county park facility. Larry is sendiag an "otiprial" to the counuy.
There was some internal discussion on a few issues concerning the sublease that are sanunanzcd
below:
Management Platt — the eousry Is responsible for anbmntttng a separate managemuauc plan
for the amount of acreage covered under their sublease. According to Delmas Barber.
DSL/oFS, the plan can be submitted as an operational plan which could be included into our
land management plan as an appendix However, the county must have an approved
maaagw= pian within► one year of the signed sublease, and since our land management plan is
not due for another 4 years, the county wm bave to submit to the DSL's their operational plan
separately. The sublease stipulates that the county has 10 coombs following the execution date
of the sublease to submit a plan to CAMA for review, prior to thein submitting it to DSL.
Since the sublease arm is less than 160 acres the plan does not bave to go to ARC for approval,
it will just need DSL's approval. DWnw says that recent cbanges in the "glitch bill" now
references plans written for lands under 160 acres do not have to have an advisory commitue or
public hearing.
'i i+* courm should contact De11 ; (8501487 1750 dir------ more information
on the format of their clan and its submission for aaafOyed•
Lease FeeS - a sublease fee of S300/ycar is required under rule- The county is responsible
for paying this fee to DSL, even though we pay a lease fee on the overall property=
AUGUST 22, 2000
Francis M Coffey
1335 River Ridge Drive
Vero Beach FL 32963-2564
Mr. James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Dear Mr. Chandler,
A"i 4)s c.
August 15, 2000
,
This is a request to be put on the County Commissioners' agenda for the August
21, 2000 meeting under " Public Discussion Items' to comment on the "Sublease
Agreement between Department of Environmental Protection, State of Florida,
and Indian River County" regarding submission of a Management Plan by the
County.
Attached is a letter from the State of Florida regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
A4. *IV7"
Francis M. Coffey
Cc: James W. Davis
Director of Public Works
Francis M. Coffey, 1335 River Ridge Drive, stated that he had spoken to someone
on the County staff who had stated that the County was not aware that a Management Plan
had to be submitted for North County Park and questioned whether the County intends to
submit such a plan.
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK 114 PG 699
-73-
Chairman Adams presented a letter of August 21, 2000:
Department of
Environmental Protection
Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399.3000
August 21, 2000
Honorable Fran A. Adams, Chairman
Boar! of Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32980
Dear Chairman Adams:
D" & Ssruhs
Setroary
RECEIVE
AUG 2 1 ?.OGnj
BOARD OFCOUNTY
COMMISSION
You have asked about the management plan requirement for the area based on the St.
Sebastian River State Buffer Preserve for the county park 1 have spoken with the
person in c ftrge of the state lands management plans and we concur that fts acd ty is
covered within the more comprehensive management plan of the butler preserve. What
will be required is a detailed site plan of the proposed facility as required by the sublease
conditions. We will be communicating about those as we review the information that you
have submitted.
Please let me know it you need any additional information.
sC7�'" '
Larry
EmironrAdn*tistt*tor
Chairman Adams thanked Mr. Coffey for his interest and advised that the
Management Plan was submitted and approved over a year ago. The Governor has also
approved the Plan. The DEP will be making a presentation to the Board at a later date. She
suggested that Mr. Coffey contact appropriate County staff regarding any future questions.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
AUGUST 229 2000
-74-
I
9.B.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANK L. ZORC -
REQUEST TO SPEAK ON "PRESS JOURNAL,
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2000, SETTING A PUBLIC
HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 5 ON THE PROPOSED 1 t
INCREASE IN THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX TO
HELP FINANCE THE DEAL" (DODGERS)
The Board reviewed a letter of August 16, 2000:
F�,�tih LEo Zo=STORAGI
REAL TOR - DE\'ELOI'ER -BUILDER -
2044 DeLeon Ave. Vero Beach. Fla. 32960
� use Ixuuwn e� awsw
August 16`x. 2000
i
Indian River County Commission
Administration Offices c% Ms. Hunter
1840 25'' Street
Vero Beach, Fla. 32960
Dear Ms. Hunter:
Telephones and Fax 1-561-5624646
Cell Phone 24 hours 1-561-532-3808
HAND DELIVERED
Please place me on the August =d. Commission agenda under Public Items.
My subject relates to yesterdays Commission action as reported in the Press
Journal - copy below:
Press Journal Wednesday, August 16, 2000
a Setting a public hearing for
Sept. 5 on the proposed 1 -cent in-
crease in the Tourist Development
Tax to help finance the deal.
I have confirmed with the commission office that this Public Hearing is now
to be part of the regular commission "morning meeting" Sept. 5th. 2000.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-75-
It is my opinion, and I will very strongly request and recommend that this
most important long term "Taxpayers Issue" be scheduled in the evening to
make it more accommodating_ for the average citizen to attend, and participate.
R ti-rc
� k XC: To all.concerned parties.
Indian River Taxpayers Assoc.
35 Years In Vero Beach Home Building & Real Estate Services USC. 0000880
REALTOR BK 0099894
Frank Zorc, 2044 deLeon Avenue, read a prepared statement and advised that he
does not know anyone who is against the Dodgers. He applauds them for their entertainment
value and wants them to keep their business in Vero Beach. He advised that petitions are
being collected asking for a referendum approval of any City action in this matter and asked
that the Board reset the public hearing dealing with the 1¢ sales tax to an evening meeting.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK 114 PG 702
_76 i
C]
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC
HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 5.2000: PINE TREE PARK LAKE
PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION - REQUEST FOR
RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT FOR A PORTION OF 6TH
STREET AND 7TH STREET IN PINE TREE PARK (Legislative)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 16,,2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DY4SION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
e
Robert M. Keating, AICP /
Community Developmen Direew
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP - 0
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 16, 2000
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for the September 5, 2000 Board Meeting
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 22, 2000.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration at
its September 5, 2000 meeting.
Pine Tree Park Lake Property Owners' Association's Request for Right -of -Way
Abandonment for a Portion of 6' Street and 741 Street in Pine Tree Park (Legislative).
RECOMMENDATION:
The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board's information. No action is
needed.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
AUGUST 22, 2000
INFAI
BX 114 PG 703
•
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR - PROPOSED COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING STRATEGY MEETING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 16, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: August 16, 2000
SUBJECT: Proposed Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting
FROM: J es CE handler County Administrator
At the conclusion of the Commission meeting Tuesday, August 22', if convenient for
the Board, I would request a short collective bargaining strategy meeting.
County Administrator Jim Chandler requested that the Board meet in the first floor
conference room immediately after the Board meeting.
CONSENSUS was reached to hold a collective bargaining strategy meeting upon
conclusion of today's Board meeting, as requested.
11.A.1. MANATEE PROTECTION AND BOATING SAFETY
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN (CMP) - FISH
AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
HCl; SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB (SMC), AND
MARINE ADVISORY/NARROWS WATERSHED ACTION
COMMITTEE (MAMMA
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 8, 2000:
AUGUST 22, 200o BK 0 I 4 PG 704
7s
•
TO: James E. Chandler
_County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. eating, AICP /
THROUGH: Roland M. DeBlois f
Chief, Environmental Planning
FROM: Brian Pooley
Staff Environmental Planner
DATE: August 8, 2000
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety
Comprehensive Management Plan
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 22, 2000.
Inwistaw
In 1989, Indian River County was designated as one of thirteen "key" counties in Florida required
by the State to develop comprehensive management plans to reduce manatee mortality and
enhance boating safety. For a number of years, the Indian River County Manatee Protection and
Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP) has been a work in progress. Due to its
size and boater/manatee use conflicts, Indian River County is considered a lower state priority for
adopting a CMP compared to others of the thirteen key counties. County staff has now completed
the plan, having coordinated with staff of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC),
the Save the Manatee Club (SMC), and the County Marine Advisory/Narrows Watershed Action
Committee (MANWAC).
On August 11, 1999, the BCC reviewed a draft of the CMP and approved it for transmittal to the
FWC for its review. Since that time, staff has received comments from the FWC, the SMC, and
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Staff has updated some information within the plan and
incorporated minor changes recommended by the three reviewing entities. None of the changes
contravenes or significantly changes the intent of the originally approved plan. Generally,
AUGUST 22, 2000
-79-
BX 1 14 PG 705
only additions, clarifications, and technical editing changes were made. Now staff is requesting
that the Board approve the modifications for transmittal of the finalized CMP to the State.
Summary of CMP
The purpose of the CMP is to establish a strategy that equitably balances manatee protection,
habitat preservation, and boating safety with commercial and recreational marine interests. The
principal focus of this effort is the identification and implementation of protection and management
practices necessary to ensure the recovery and protection of the Florida manatee's population.
The plan is divided into three parts: Existing Conditions, Analysis, and Action Plan. The Existing
Conditions section provides data and information regarding manatee habitat and mortality, boating
activity, public awareness and education, and boat facilities. The Analysis section reviews the
existing speed zone plan and suggests changes based on recent manatee mortality and boat safety
issues. A main component of this section is the establishment of Marina Siting Zones. Future
marina development will be directed away from sensitive manatee habitat and directed towards
areas where marinas are more appropriate. Finally, the Action Plan details objectives and policies
that will implement manatee protection and boating safety measures and provides a method by
which the county can measure the success or failure of this plan.
Summary of Modifications
Attached is a Comment/Response Matrix that identifies the FWC's comments on the 1999 draft
CMP and the County's response. FWC's comments were similar to concerns expressed by the
SMC and the FWS.
County staff changes to the 1999 draft MPP, to address FWC comments, are depicted in the revised
MPP in the form of shikedimugh (deletions) and underline (additions).
As indicated in the matrix, clarifications were made to the plan by adding definitions of "High" and
"Occasional" Manatee Use areas as well as "High Watercraft -Related Manatee Mortality". Also,
information regarding existing marina facilities was updated to reflect the results of a survey
conducted in January 2000. Finally, Section 1.2 of the Action Plan was expanded to include all
criteria used in the evaluation of proposed marina projects. Within that section, the following
additions were made:
clarified techniques to be used to determine percent coverage of submerged aquatic
vegetation;
- included techniques for evaluation of projects to determine if they are within High or
Occasional Manatee Use areas and/or a High Watercraft -Related Manatee Mortality area;
- clarified what the results of the evaluation methodology may be; and
- added a flow chart that illustrates the evaluation process to be followed when reviewing
marina projects.
The modified CMP was considered by the MANWAC at its meeting on June 5, 2000 (see attached
unapproved minutes). Since there was not a quorum present, a consensus was established. The
consensus of the members present was that the plan be forwarded to the BCC with minor changes.
Those minor changes are reflected in the attached plan. Both the FWC and the SMC have given
tacit approval to the plan as presented, so there should be no further agency dictated changes.
County staff is now presenting the finalized plan for Board consideration to approve the plan and
authorize its transmittal to the State for Governor and Cabinet approval.
AUGUST 229 2000
-80-
BKIILow PG706
•
As proposed, the CMP does not address FWC and SMC comments regarding speed zones.
According to the -'WC, it is not necessary, at this time, to address the specific speed zones. Since
speed zones are likely to be the most contentious of the issues, County and FWC staff decided that
the CMP, without the speed zones, would be adopted first. Then later, the County would work
with the FWC, SMC, and various groups to resolve the speed zone issues. Any speed zone
changes must be adopted by rule by the FWC, and will involve public hearings and other
opportunities for public input.
The modified CMP has undergone substantial scrutiny by various entities (FWC, MANWAC,
SMC) and represents a balancing of environmental protection and public recreation. Staff's
position is that the Plan achieves this balance, is in the interest of the County, and will likely be
accepted by the state.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Manatee
Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan and direct staff to transmit the
plan, as a final document, to the State for approval consideration.
Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan
ACTION PLAN
Based on the analysis herein of existing conditions and associated data, this section, the Action
Plan, sets forth specific actions that Indian River County will take, in the form of policies, to
further manatee protection and boating safety objectives. This Action Plan contains the
following components: Goal; Objectives and Policies; Implementation; and Evaluation and
Monitoring.
GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
This Goal and associated Objectives and Policies shall be adopted by reference to the existing
Coastal Management Element of the Comprehensive Plan (March, 1998) as required by
Objective 3 (Policy 3.10) of the Coastal Management Element.
GOAL
It is the goal of Indian River County to equitably balance manatee protection, habitat
preservation, and boating safety with commercial and recreational marine interests.
OBJECTIVE 1 Boat Facility and Marina Siting and Construction
Through 2001, there shall be no ttt increased impact to manatee habitat, or the natural
resources of the Indian River Lagoon, including seagrass beds, water quality, estuarine
wetlands, and mangrove fringe, attributed to the development or expansion of boat
facilities in Indian River County.
1.1 By 1999, the siting or expansion of all marinas and boat facilities in Indian River
County, and in each municipal government with jurisdiction over a portion of the
inland waters of IndianRiver County shall be consistent with the preliminary
'assessment criteria and policies established in this plan.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-81-
BK 114 PG 707
1.2 TtnO si6fig of - --- s •litie, itt I"dio_ n:..__ C-eeftly -hall be su
c n
Marina Siting Zones (1-9) have been established as identified in the Plan The purpose
of these Zones is to provide the public with some guidance as to the potential for the
expansion or siting of new boat facilities
In addition to hese Zonesspecific criteria will be applied to each expansion or new
boatfacility regrequest. These criteria are as follows:
1. The siting of new marinas or the expansion or rearrangement of existing boatimg
facilities/mannas shall be prohibited in each of the following areas of Indian River
our :
• All of the St Sebastian River west of the U.S. 1 Bridge:
• All of the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge:
• The area known as Jungle Trail Narrows.,
• Town Limits of Orchid:
• To Limits of Indian River Shores:
2 The siting of new marinas or the expansion. or rearrangement of existing
boating facilit�es/marinas shall be prohibited when one or more of the following
conditions are met:
(a) the footprint of the boating facility/marina (including all docks access
walkways. finger piers. mooring areas turning basins res
and ingress and egress
pathways) has a SAV coverage to ten (10) percent or greater using a
scientifically acceptable method of coverage detennination and such
determination is made between the months of May through October
(b) the water depths within the mooring areas turning basins and ingress
and egress pathways is less than -4 feet at MLW
(c) there is less than 150' distance between the waterward most projection of the
boat facility (including mooring. pilings and boats) and the ICW channel
3• The siting of new marinas or the expansion or rearrangement of existing
boating facilities/marinas shall be evaluated using the following criteria
(a) no more than 100 Unm feet of native shoreline vegetation shall be
altered (trimmed cut removed_ killed or destro,ygd)•
(b) a site located witbini a High _Manatee Use area, or a High Watercraft
Related Manatee Mortality area, as defined in this plan shall be subject to site
specific design restrictions to minimizejotential adverse manatee impacts
including (but not limited to): restrictions on the total number of boat slip
allowed• use of more upland storage instead of wet storage restrictions on the
maximum size of boats that use the facility/marina: restrictions on the number
Of powerboats that use the facility (powerboat•sailboat ratio) mnd—esign oft e
facili /manna: establishment of a powerboat to length of shoreline ratio (e.g..
one powerboat per 100 feet of shoreline) and/or reduction in the size of the
facih /manna.
AUGUST 229 2000
-82-
0
The process of evaluation can be eenerally represented by Figure 13 which shows—
diagram maric representation of the process This flow chart is meant to ba -a euide not an
absolute process
A
f ..� 1- .. All
W) ...J
i� i'BlFiiiil'�WBE2Fd2pf�1� �:... .. � /A\ r ,
s
No fee -in -lieu paymerts,
will be accepted as mitigation.
1.8 By August 1999, the County shall coordinate with the Town of Indian River Shores,
the Town of Orchid, the City of Sebastian and the City of Vero Beach concerning siting
of marina/boat facilities and the overall implementation of this plan by conducting
public workshops and by soliciting comments from the staff and elected officials of
these municipal governments.
1.9 In the event that an existing marina is destroyed by a natural disaster, the marina may
be re -built within the same footprint of the damaged structure provided that the marina
was in compliance with regulations at the time of its construction. Existing Marinas
that are re -built shall be consistent with the policies listed under Objective 1 of this
plan.
1.10 Covered boat slips, covered terminal platforms, and unwalled boat shelters shall not be
permitted in areas where SAV coverage is ten (10) percent or greater.
1.11 Floating docks and dock designs which have the potential to entrap manatees or prevent
them from accessing foraging areas shall be prohibited.
1.12 By 1999, the County Environmental Planning Section, in cooperation with the FDEP's
FWC's Bureau of Protected Species Management, will produce a map titled
Constraints to Boat Facility Siting in the I L. This map will display the areas of high,
medium and low constraints throughout the county. Density thresholds and limitations
for development shall apply to sites within these locations. This map will be kept on
file in the Community Development Department, and will be used to conduct site
specific reviews of boat facility siting and expansion proposals.
1.13 A maximum density threshold of one (1) powerboat per 100 feet of shoreline along the
I L shall be retained in the marina facility siting zones specified in the Marina Siting
section of this plan. These zones include: Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 4, the portion of Zone
6 lying within the Town of Indian River Shores, Zone 8, and Zone 9.
1.14 The County shall encourage the expansion and upgrading of existing boat facilities as
an alternative to constructing new boat facilities by considering the removal of
mmeYing the 1:100 powerboat shoreline density ratio on a case-by-case basis from the
following Marina Siting Zones: Zone 3, Zone 5, the portion of Zone 6 lying within the
City of Vero Beach, and Zone 7. As a minimum a l • 100 powerboat•shoreline density
ratio maybbe =lied. if warranted using the criteria in Section 1.2.
1.15 By August(COQ 4999, the county shall amend Resolution# 94-67 (Condition 17 of the
Grand Harbor Development Order) to release the "sailboat only" restriction from 72
wet slips, thereby encouraging utilization of existing marina capacity.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 114 PG 70
-83- 9
Chief Environmental Planner Roland DeBlois stated that in 1989 Indian River County
was designated a key county by the State to adopt this plan. The backup contains the most
current revisions to the plan.
Commissioner Ginn commented that the Marine AdvisoryNarrows Watershed Action
Committee (MANWAC) had been through the plan and the revisions line by line. This is
the first Plan on the Treasure Coast to be approved.
Chairman Adams commended staff for a wonderful job and questioned how we will
deal with the speed issues since they have been removed from the Plan.
Environmental Planner Brian Poole stated that it is his understanding that the State
will adopt speed zones. They will hold public hearings to give everyone a chance for input.
Staff did not want to hold up the Plan because of problems with the speed zones.
Chairman Adams questioned whether annual overflights are being done now, and Mr.
Poole stated that the overflights will not be done due to budget constraints. We are still
doing counts.
Chairman Adams then questioned whether any money from the automobile tags is
available for these purposes.
Mary Morris, Bureau of Protected Species Management, noted that those funds go
to research, management of events, and special services.
Sandra Clinger, Save the Manatee Club, stated that Indian River County has been
the best of the key counties. However, there has been an increasing and disturbing trend in
manatee mortality. Prior to the speed zone regulations there were an average of 0.5 deaths
annually and, since the zones went into effect; the average has been 2 per year. From 1974
nuGusT zz, 2000 BK I 14 PG 7 10
to 1993, there were 10 deaths. Then from 1994 to 1995, there were 10 deaths. She asked
the Board to keep that in mind when reviewing their list of recommendations. Save the
Manatee Club cannot support expanding boating activity unless the manatees are more
strongly protected. She stated she will supply a copy of their recommendations to the Board.
Commissioner Ginn wanted to postpone any action until she had a chance to read the
recommendations.
Mr. DeBlois noted that direction could be given to technical staff to clean up the Plan
if the recommendations are only for small changes. However, if substantial changes are
being recommended, staff is asking for approval of the Plan "as is".
Ms. Clinger detailed some of the recommendations of SMC and Mr. DeBlois and Mr.
Poole responded to the minor changes.
Mr. DeBlois noted that some language had been loosened to allow for site specific
scrutiny.
Mr. Poole commented that the Plan has been structured to allow for flexibility.
Ms. Clinger noted that the Vero Beach Power Plant site is becoming even more
important to the manatees now that Ft. Pierce is not discharging stormwater. She also
requested some further details regarding maintenance dredging of artificial canals.
Mr. DeBlois agreed that the language could be clarified.
Chairman Adams noted that the Grand Harbor power boat restriction contained in
Policy 1.15 was done to decrease the number of power boats. She asked if that Policy could
be removed.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 114 PG 7I 1
-85-
ILI
Director Keating noted that Grand Harbor does want to increase the number of power
boats being docked.
Mr. DeBlois commented that, if you do not allow more power boats at Grand Harbor,
then they will be accommodated elsewhere..
Commissioner Ginn felt that existing marinas should be expanded rather than
allowing new marinas.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn opposed) agreed
to remove Policy 1.15 from the Plan.
Commissioner Stanbridge then requested that Policy 1.2(3)(b) be copied to Policy
1.2(1) with the deletion of the word "or" and the insertion of the word "and".
Terri Calleson, Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission/Bureau of Protected
Species Management, environmental specialist, stated that she had worked in the County on
surveys of boating activity when she was a graduate student and had reviewed some of the
earliest drafts of the County's plan. She is now in charge of reviewing the final Plan. She
commended the Commission and staff for the work that has been done and emphasized that
the Bureau will support any strengthening of the Plan. She stated that they will be
recommending approval of the Plan when it is returned and the legal staff has already said
that the Plan will go directly to the Executive Director for his approval. She expressed their
appreciation and hope that the Plan will be a big protection for the manatees in the coming
years.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 114 PG 7 12
• -86- 0
Commissioner Ginn questioned whether this is the onlyplanfromthe Treasure Coast,
and Ms. Calleson responded that it was.
Mr. Poole noted that the St. Lucie County Planner has already called and requested
a copy of the plan to use in drafting their county's plan.
Commissioner Stanbridge thanked the Bureau for their assistance in providing
additional law enforcement officers.
Tim Granse felt there were quite a few boating people and the Chamber of Commerce
who would be interested in this topic. He stated that he was at the opening of the beautiful
Round Island Park several weeks ago and counted numerous manatees, as well as close to
a hundred over by the power plant at the same time.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the
Board unanimously approved the Manatee
Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive
Management Plan, as amended ([1] deleting Policy
1.15; [2] inserting the Save the Manatee Club
requested technical changes; and [3] copying Policy
1.2(3)(b) to Policy 1.2(1) with the deletion of the
word "or" and the insertion of the word "and"), and
directed staff to transmit the plan, as a final
document, to the State for approval consideration, as
recommended by staff.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-s7-
BK 1 14 PG 713
COPY OF PLAN I5 ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD
Commissioner John Tippin left the Chambers on personal business.
11.A.2. ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER BUFFER PRESERVE - OPTION
AGREEMENT FOR COUNTY SALE OF THE FISCHER
ST. SEBASTIAN RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL LAND
PURCHASE TO THE STATE FOR COST -SHARE
REIMBURSEMENT UNDER THE STATE
CONSERVATION AND RECREATION LANDS (CARL)
PROGRAM
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 14, 2000:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
PE'4RTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. Dell CP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: August 14, 2000
SUBJECT: Board Approval of Option Agreement for County Sale of the Fischer -St. Sebastian
River Environmental Land Purchase to the State for Cost -Share Reimbursement
under the State Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) Program
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 22. 2000.
AUGUST 22, 2000
is
-s8-
K114PG714
n
u
I
•
The Board of County Commissioners, at a public hearing on March 19, 1996, approved county purchase of
the ±.95 acre "Fischer - Sebastian River" property using environmental land bond funds. The property is
located on the east and west shorelines of the south prong of the St. Sebastian River, north of C.R. 512 (see
attached map). The County closed the purchase in January 1997, under the premise that it will proceed to
obtain cost -share reimbursement under the State Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program.
Prior to county purchase of the property, in May 1995, the County executed a "Multi -Party Acquisition
Agreement" with the Division of State Lands (DSL) for the State to buy the property for inclusion in the
"Sebastian Creek" project (a.k.a., St. Sebastian River Buffer Preserve) under the CARL program. The
Agreement is for 50% cost -share of the approved appraised value, including 50% cost -share of acquisition
costs, with the exception of appraisals, which were paid for with County bond funds.
The DSL has completed its review and acceptance of appraisals and surveys of the Fischer property, and is
now ready to schedule the project reimbursement for final Governor and Cabinet approval. In order to
finalize reimbursement and closing with the State, attached is an Option Agreement for Sale and Purchase
of the Fischer property from the County to the State, for the Board's approval consideration.
The attached Option Agreement is comparable to other option agreements that the County has executed as
part of cost -share agreements with the State for the purchase of environmental lands.
Attached is a memorandum from the County attorney regarding his review of the Option Agreement as to
form and legal sufficiency. In order for the Board to make an informed decision, the County attorney's
memorandum summarizes certain provisions of the Option that run in favor of the State (and not in favor
of the County). County planning staff s position is that the risks to the County under the provisions of the
Option are minimal, and that the County should consider moving forward with approval of this standardized
Option Agreement.
Interest Conveyed, Right of Re-entry
When the County executed the Multi -Party Acquisition Agreement in 1995, and when the Board approved
purchase of the Fischer property in 1996 and directed staff to seek cost -share reimbursement, it was
understood that the CARL program policy at that time was that the State would receive full title to the
property, and that the County would retain an interest in the form of a "right of re-entry" (similar to what
the County agreed to on cost -share of the Cairns tract purchase). Since that time, the County has instigated
a change in the State's policy such that now the State is more amenable to shared title for new projects.
However, since the Fischer property was acquired under the previous policy and agreement, the attached
Option Agreement, as structured, will convey full title interest of the Fischer property to the State, and
contains a right of re-entry clause. Once conveyed to the State, the property will become a part of the
contiguous St. Sebastian River Buffer Preserve, and will be managed by the State as part of the Preserve.
Canoe Launch
County Engineering staff are in the process of finalizing design of a canoe launch facility on the Fischer
property (and adjacent property) for public access to the St. Sebastian River just north of C.R. 512 (west
side). County staff has coordinated with Buffer Preserve management staff, who are aware of the canoe
launch. As proposed, maintenance of the canoe launch facility will be the responsibility of the County, with
the remainder of the Fischer property to be managed by State Buffer Preserve staff.
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 1 14 PG 7 1 5
-89-
Wetland Acreage Adjustment
The negotiated purchase price of the Fischer property was $1,490,000. When the option contract was drafted
and subsequently executed by the seller, County and state staff were aware that there might be a wetland
acreage adjustment that could affect the appraised value of the property. For that reason, a "buffer" of
$89,400 was written into the contract, so that the seller, Dr. Henry Fischer, was aware that the purchase price
would be reduced, up to that much, if wan -anted by a final survey of wetlands and overall acreage.
Consequently, as a condition of closing, Dr. Fischer was required to escrow $89,400 to account for a
potential property value adjustment due to increased wetland acreage. (The Board approved this arrangement
to proceed with closing because of indications that Dr. Fischer would not sell the property unless a certain
time frame was met.) As it turned out, there were more wetlands than originally estimated, and Dr. Fischer
forfeited the escrow to the County. Due the wetland area adjustment, the State's finalized approved appraised
value is $1,210,000, which translates to 43% ($605,000) reimbursement of the County's purchase price of
the overall property (not including 50% share of acquisition costs, which will be an additional reimbursement
the County will receive under the Option Agreement ).
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Option Agreement for
County sale of the Fischer -St. Sebastian River property to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement
Trust Fund at the price of $605,000, and authorize the Board Chairman to execute the document and other
documents as necessary to facilitate the sale closing.
1. Location map
2. County attorney's memorandum
3. Option Agreement
4. 1995 Multi -Party Acquisition Agreement
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 7, 6
-90-
is 0
F�5CPWR- ST sesVlsT1P,N
1Z1vEfz 7 /
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK 114 PG 717
-91-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Tippin absent)
unanimously approved the Option Agreement for
sale of the Fischer -St. Sebastian River property to
the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement
Trust Fund at the price of $605,000 and authorized
the Chairman to execute the Agreement and other
documents as necessary to facilitate the sale closing,
as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G. RESOLUTION 2000-089 ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION
AND MAINTENANCE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS FOR
AD AVENUE (40TH AVENUE SWC; GAME STREET (6TH
LANE SWC; AND DEUCE COURT (5TH PLACE SMO, AND
DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN WEST
SIDE SUBDIVISION (WEST SIDE RACQUET CLUB -
ISABELLE DAYTONI
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 14, 2000:
AUGUST 22, 2000 BK 1 1 4 PG 718
-92-
0 0
•
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director 1
SUBJECT: West Side Subdivision - Acceptance of Private Roads, Right -of -
Ways and Drainage Easements
DATE: August 14, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
In 1995, the Board approved a 100% property owner funded special
assessment project to resurface private roads and improve drainage
in West Side Subdivision located south of 5`" Street SW east of 43rd
Avenue. The project was completed in 1998. The property owners
requested the County to assume maintenance of the private right-of-
ways and drainage easements at that time. Staff requested certain
brick above -grade headwalls in the right-of-way to be removed
within the 6' roadside clear zone prior to acceptance. This
removal work has been completed.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The plat for West Side Subdivision recorded Nov. 8, 1974, included
a "certificate of dedication" that "dedicates all street and
drainage easements shown on this plat for the use of the property
owners in this subdivision, and "West Side Racquet Club", with the
full knowledge that the same are not dedicated to the public until
there is a formal acceptance of these streets and/or easements, or
any part thereof, by the County." Since the streets have recently
been resurfaced and drainage improvements completed, staff has no
objection to acceptance of maintenance.
The alternatives are as follows:
Alternative No. 1
Accept maintenance of the road right-of-way and drainage easements
by approving the attached resolution.
Alternative No. 2
Deny acceptance thereby leaving the roads and drainage private.
RECOM MMATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the attached Resolution
is approved.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-93-
Bk 1 14 PG 719
0
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Tippin absent)
unanimously adopted Resolution 2000-089 accepting
the dedication and maintenance of the Right -of -
Ways for Ad Avenue (40' Avenue SW); Game
Street (6' Lane SW); and Deuce Court (5' Place
SW) and drainage easements located within West
Side Subdivision (West Side Racquet Club - Isabelle
Dayton).
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 089
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ACCEPTING
THE DEDICATION -AND MAINTENANCE EOF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS FOR AD
AVENUE (40TR AVENUE SW) GAME STREET (678 LANE SW), AND DEUCE COURT
(5" PLACE SW), AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN WEST SIDE
SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, the property owners of West Side Subdivision have
petitioned the County to accept the dedication and maintenance
of Ad Avenue (40t' Avenue SW), Game Street (6th Lane SW), and
Deuce Court (St" Place SW), including drainage easements located
within West Side Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 3,
Public Records of Indian River County; and,
WHEREAS, the Indian River County Department of Public Works
has completed a full inspection and evaluation of all factors
relevant to the acceptance of the dedication and maintenance of
road right-of-ways and drainage easements within West Side
Subdivision; and,
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK 114 PG 720
-94- 9
WHEREAS, the Indian River County Department of Public Works
has recommended that the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County accept the dedication and maintenance of the road
right-of-ways and drainage easements located within West Side
Subdivision.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COW aSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY hereby accepts the
dedication and maintenance of the right-of-ways for Ad Avenue
(40th Avenue SW), Game Street (6th Lane SW), and Deuce Court (5th
Place SW) and drainage easements located within West Side
Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 3, Public Records
of Indian River County.
The foregoing resolution was offered by
Commissioner Stanhrid0e who moved its adoption. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn and, upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Absent
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
_ Commissioner Ken R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 22nd day of August, 2000.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
010
Attest: Approved by BCC__ OA -22-00
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk of Circuit Court
Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal
�u Sufficiency
, — Paul o. Bangel, County Attorney
AUGUST 22, 2000 D� P 7
2 1
-95-
J
>s 01Ws
15 as a �+p•vu ID1
17.0
s 6TH LANE SW (GA)k STREET al '
U M7
oldl 010
S U B 15141 <
o, 3
12 IIfiA
wo
�� 940
w P.B.I. 09 003 136 Inns %61
23145r i:z i,.)
.� 7
d.78 AC
:S W TR a a: 19
1$ 3 4
LJ
�Y
z
r, O
I4 8111
&TH PLACE $W
4TH LANE SW ----
W
ttan ¢1.Po
1
{y
K-
W 9
Z
635Y'
i
IN37 4¢fl
IId67 Q
7
. 2222...
ro
Edi
IF
14 X
33
I
um
0 (
W1I.
w O.i a
,ya 4' TR 8
b
7TH PLA
'
�(-
I'
2222
o �t
4
"-W
1
�rou �
1
�u
24
1
�.i I
o��ot.o
3
2
11
y
_ ..
_
Juu
17162
- raot
ttt58
t g ..
W
III
us
W
.__ O
{:
11
ROAD)
.,..2�.
'STFI _SST
_ - -
— - ___ — -
is
I
STH PLACE SW a
--
(DEUCE COURT)
.. 141
1
W
, . .. _
-,J91s
___
..
2222...
W E
S
'
TI�.11
T1
01!
02
136.0
!Q;
W .
+ s
t1
ip a
02
tZ 56.0
TRACT A
.. ... ,.
...g
:i
• J
F
g B
44.0
W EST SIDE RAC
U ET
a
I
coI
,'
= 4g wtl
CLU 8
00001
6.1
�p t�
:.
I
� 3 023. S2
r ea
o
DC7
'
r
am
B.O
.�
q6
At
+
8$9 AC
5
SEN
&� $
~
yqa
00001
0110
00001
$
'1 s.
.
043
:a
Ibo�
oo0ot.0
olio
1W* J Y
�
�4` V%
8¢A
A01
A 7.07 8
a:
3
,
.
6
2"
o,6d1&at4.89
NTSW
AC
222.8 AC
1susCoo99
-8
�.ofl
s..
>s 01Ws
15 as a �+p•vu ID1
17.0
s 6TH LANE SW (GA)k STREET al '
U M7
oldl 010
S U B 15141 <
o, 3
12 IIfiA
wo
�� 940
w P.B.I. 09 003 136 Inns %61
23145r i:z i,.)
.� 7
g
S:
Zia."
4¢JI u¢N?'.638
LJ
i 10 z 9 >1
r, O
I4 8111
&TH PLACE $W
a
ttan ¢1.Po
�
{y
K-
W 9
Z
635Y'
i
IN37 4¢fl
IId67 Q
7
uUI
IF
14 X
33
IM6, M
um
15 a
W1I.
7TH PLA
'
Ig
I'
6 j7
gg
1
�rou �
Ai X1
a1'�c
0
•
Commissioner Tippin returned to the Chambers.
O.B. VICE CHAIRMAN CAROLINE D. GINN - DISCUSSION
REGARDING THE SPACE NEEDS COMMITTEE
Commissioner Ginn commented that she has not yet received all the Commissioners'
appointees for this committee and requested that they be submitted within the next week.
She also noted that she had heard that the Vero Mall property has been sold, and County
Administrator Chandler stated that he will check into the rumor.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of the Emergency
Services District Meeting, the Board would reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the
Solid Waste Disposal District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
AUGUST 22, 2000
-97-
BKiI4PG723
•
J
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 11:27 a.m.
ATTEST:
Iarton, Clerk
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
Minutes Approved:
AUGUST 22, 2000
BK 114 PG 724
• -98- 0