Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10/3/2000
•0 MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2000 - 9:00 A.M. County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Fran B. Adams, Chairman District 1 Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman District 5 Kenneth R. Macht District 3 Ruth M. Stanbridge District 2 John W. Tippin District 4 James E. Chandler, County Administrator Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER BACKUP PAGES 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE James E. Chandler 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ADDITIONS: D.C. 5e Avenue Traffic CORRECTION. 9.A.1. The Oaks of Vero, Inc. - Northwest Northeast Comer of 12' Street 5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular meeting of Sept. 5, 2000 B. Budget meeting of Sept. 6, 2000 7. CONSENT AGENDA _ A. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated September 14, 2000) BX 1 15 PG 228 1-9 I:.T4Wx114 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES B. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated September 21, 2000) 10-19 C. Recapitulation Report of Errors and Insolvencies for the 1999 Tax Roll — Office of Tax Collector (letter dated August 30, 2000) 20-25 D. Accept Resignation of Dorothy Thomas from the Economic Opportunities Council (memorandum dated September 26, 2000) 26-28 E. Appointment of Norma Mooney to the Economic Opportunities Council (memorandum dated September 26, 2000) 29-30 F. Out -of -County Travel by Commissioners to attend the Florida Association of Counties 2001 Legislative Conference November 15-17, 2000 in Tallahassee 31-36 G. Accept resignation from Sheriff Gary C. Wheeler from Children's Services Advisory Committee as an ex officio member (letter dated September 27, 2000) 37 H. Appointment of Sheriff Elect Roy Raymond to the Children's Services Advisory Committee as an ex officio member (letter dated September 27, 2000) 38 I. Lawrence M. Thomas Request for Partial Release of Easement at 7340 33d Ave. (Lot 32, Copelands Landing S/D, Ph. I) (memorandum dated September 19, 2000) 39-44 J. Request for After -the -Fact Authorization for the Vice Chairman to Sign a Notice of Intent to Apply for Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Emergency Set -Aside Funding (memorandum dated September 26, 2000) 45-49 K. Consideration of Economic Development Community De- velopment Block Grant Consultant Selection Committee Recommendations (memorandum dated September 26, 2000) 50-51 L. Appointment of North Barrier Island Corridor Plan Task Force (memorandum dated September 27, 2000) 52-59 BK 115 PG 229 • • 7. CONSENT AGENDA Lcont'd.l: BACKUP M. Board Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost- PAGES Share Agreement Extensions/Addenda for. Oyster Bar Salt Marsh; Oslo Riverfront South; North Sebastian C. A. Addition; and Wabasso Scrub C.A. Addition LAAC Sites _ (memorandum dated September 12, 2000) 60-78 N. Bid Award: IRC #3003 Annual Bid for Corrugated Steel Pipe — Public Works / Road & Bridge Division (memorandum dated September 20, 2000) 79-97 O. Bid Award: IRC #3002 Annual Bid for Reinforced Con- crete Pipe — Public Works / Road & Bridge Division (memorandum dated September 20, 2000) 98-109 P. Bid Award: IRC #3011 Annual Bid for Janitorial Supplies Purchasing Warehouse (memorandum dated September 15, 2000) 110-130 Q. Tourism Study in the Amount of $58,841 from Tourist Development Funds (memorandum dated September 27, 2000) 131-133 R. 2000/2001 State of Florida Department of Health Contract (memorandum dated September 21, 2000) 134-166 S. Traffic Control Device Ledger (memorandum dated September 25, 2000) - 167-181 T. Driver vs Indian River Countv. Order to Mediate (memorandum dated September 18, 2000) 182 U. Resolution Cancelling Taxes on Acquired Property (memorandum date September 25, 2000) 183-190 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None - BK 115 PG 230 C, _ BACKUP 9. PUBLIC ITEMS PAGES A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±70.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTH QST_ CORNER OF 12TH STREET AND 58TH AVENUE, FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), TO RS -3, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE The Oaks of Vero, Inc.'s Request to Rezone ±70.4 acres from A-1 to RS -3 Quasi -Judicial (memorandum dated September 25, 2000) 206-222 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR +/26.4 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 9m STREET SW, APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD OF A MILE WEST OF 43RD AVENUE, FROM A-1, AGRI- CULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), TO RS -3, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE George F. Hamner, Jr., Trustee, Request to Rezone ± 26.4 Acres from A-1 to RS -3 Quasi -Judicial (memorandum dated September 25, 2000) 191-205 3. TEFRA (Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act) Hearing Escambia County Housing Finance Authority Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds (memorandum dated September 22, 2000) 223-238 B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS None 10. COUNTY ADMIMSTRATOR'S MATTERS Teamsters Collective Bargaining Agreement (memorandum dated September 27, 2000) 239-276 11. ' DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development None BK 115 PG 231 00 0 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): BACKUPPAGES B. Emergency Services None - C. General Services None D. Leisure Services None E. Office of Management and Budget 1. Purchasing Card Program Policy (memorandum dated September 21, 2000) 277-294 2. Auditing Services (memorandum dated September 27, 2000) 295-296 F. Personnel None G. Public Works 1. North County Regional Park - Acceptance and Execution of FRDAP Grant (memorandum dated September 26, 2000) 297-313 2. Vero Tropical Gardens Subdivision (memorandum dated September 8, 2000) 314-320 3. Artificial Reef Grant Agreements with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Committee (memorandum dated September 25, 2000) -321-3-41 4. Fairgrounds Agricultural Arena - Amendment to FDACS Agreements #4031 and $4617 (memorandum dated September 22, 2000) 342-344 H. Utilities 1. Bid Award: IRC 2062 Dixie Heights Water Assess- ment Project - A portion of Dixie Gardens and the Piney Oaks Subdivision - Utilities department (memorandum dated September 25, 2000) 345-372 2. Sebastian Water Expansion Phase III -A Resolutions I and II (memorandum dated September 25, 2000) - 373-410 BK 115 PG 232 I r � BACKUP 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): PAGES H. Utilities (cont'd.): 3. Developer's Agreement for Proposed Water Main - Expansion Looping Project Along Indian River Drive South of Sebastian City Limit to US#1 (memorandum dated September 5, 2000) 411-419 I. Human Services None 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Fran B. Adams Resolution Amending the Emergency Services District Advisory Committee 420-422 B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn C. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge E. Commissioner John W. TinDin 1. Resolution Amending Economic Development Council to include manufacturing representative 2. Appointment of Patrick Faller to represent manufacturing on the Economic Development Council (backup provided separately) BK 1 15 PG 233 423 go 0 BACk up 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS PAGES A. Emergency Services District None B. Solid Waste Disposal District Engineering Services to Prepare the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Annual Recycling Report for the Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District (memorandum dated September 21, 2000) 424-431 C. Environmental Control Board None 15. ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m. BK 1 15 PG 234 00 0 INDEX TO MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF OCTOBER 3, 2000 1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................... 1 2. INVOCATION .................................................. 1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....................................... 1 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ................................... 1 5. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS .......................... 2 6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 ..................... 2 63. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 6, 2000 ..................... 2 7. CONSENT AGENDA ............................................ 3 7.A. Approval of Warrants ....................................... 3 7.B. Approval of Warrants ...................................... 10 7.C. Office of Tax Collector - Recapitulation Report of Errors and Insolvencies for the 1999 Tax Roll ....................................... 17- 7.D. Economic Opportunities Council - Acceptance of Resignation of Dorothy Thomas................................................. 18 7.E. Economic Opportunities Council - Appointment of Norma Mooney to Fill Vacant Position ........................................... 19 7.F. Out -of -County Travel - Florida Association of Counties 2001 Legislative Conference - November 15-17, 2000 - Tallahassee ................ 20 7.G. Children's Services Advisory Committee - Resignation of Sheriff Gary C. Wheeler as an Ex Officio Member ............................. 20 7.H. Children's Services Advisory Committee - Appointment of Sheriff Elect Roy Raymond as an Ex Officio Member ........................ 21 7.I. Resolution No. 2000-117 - Partial Release of Easement at 7340 33rd Avenue (Lot 32, Copelands Landing Subdivision, Ph. 1) - Requested by Lawrence M. Thomas ...................................... 22 1 BK 1 15 PG 235 7.J. Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Emergency Set -Aside Funding - After -the -Fact Authorization to Execute Notice of Intent to Apply (St. John's River Water Management District - Wabasso Area Water Wells) ......................................... 26 7.K. Economic Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - Approval of Consultant Selection Committee's Ranking - Negotiations with Berryman and Henniger Authorized ............................ 28 7.L. Appointment of North Barrier Island Corridor Plan Task Force Members ....................................................... 30 7.M. Environmental Lands - Oyster Bar Salt Marsh, Oslo Riverfront South, North Sebastian C.A. Addition, Wabasso Scrub C.A. Addition LAAC Sites - Florida Communities Trust Cost -Share Agreement Extensions/Addenda ....................................................... 32 7.N. Bid #3003 - Annual Bid for Corrugated Steel Pipe Awarded to Metal Culverts, Inc. (Public Works/Road & Bridge Division) ............. 34 7.0. Bid #3002 - Annual Bid for Reinforced Concrete Pipe - Awarded to CSR Hydro Conduit of Florida, Inc. (Public Works/Road & Bridge Division) ....................................................... 39 7.P. Bid #3011- Annual Bid for Janitorial Supplies - Purchasing Warehouse - Awarded to Janitorial Depot of America, Inc . .................... 41 7.Q. Tourism Study - Indian River County Chamber of Commerce - Funding Authorization ............................................. 43 7.R. State of Florida Department of Health Contract - 2000/2001 ......... 44 7.S. Resolution No. 2000-118 - Traffic Control Device Ledger .......... 45 7.T. Driver vs. Indian River County - Order to Mediate - Appointment of Community Development Director Robert Keating as County's Negotiator ....................................................... 48 7.U. Resolution No. 2000-119 - Cancelling Taxes on Acquired Property - R/W Dedication for Barber Street Re -alignment - Nelson C. Hyatt and Marie Dolores Hyatt (City of Sebastian) ............................. 49 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES .... 57 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-031- THE OAKS OF VERO, INC. - REZONE ±70.4 ACRES FROM A-1 TO RS -3 (NORTHEAST CORNER OF 12TH STREET AND 58TH AVENUE) ........................... 57 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-032 - ZONING AMENDMENT FOR ±26.4 ACRES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET SW 1/3 MILE WEST OF 43RD AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RS -3 REQUESTED BY GEORGE F. HAMNER, JR. TRUSTEE ...................................... 69 2 0* 0 •s • 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-120 - TAX EQUITY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT (TEFRA) HEARING - ESCAMBIA COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY SINGLE-FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS ............................................. 79 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTER - TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 769 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT (LABOR AND TRADES) ... 84 11.E.1. PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM POLICY .................... 85 11.E.2. AUDITING SERVICES CONTRACT AWARDED TO HARRIS, COTHERMAN, & ASSOCIATES .................................. 87 11.G.1. NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK - ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF FLORIDA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) PROJECT GRANT AGREEMENT ............... 89 11.G.2. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-121- RECANTING RESOLUTION NOS. 95- 141 AND 95-142 CONCERNING CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND WATER MAIN EXTENSION FOR VERO TROPICAL GARDENS SUBDIVISION AND A PORTION OF PARADISE PARK SUBDIVISION, UNIT#3......................................... 91 11.G.3. ARTIFICIAL REEF GRANT AGREEMENTS - FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE ........................ 95 11.G.4. FAIRGROUNDS AGRICULTURAL ARENA - AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES (FDACS) AGREEMENTS #4031 AND 94617 (AUDIT LANGUAGE) ...... 97 11.14.1. BID #2062 - DIXIE HEIGHTS WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT - A PORTION OF DIXIE GARDENS AND THE PINEY OAKS SUBDIVISIONS - UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - TRI -SURE CORPORATION ............. 98 11.11.2. RESOLUTION NOS. 2000-122 AND 2000-123 - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -A - 1) RESOLUTIONS I AND II - AND 2) SUBSCRIPTION TO CITY OF SEBASTIAN RESOLUTION NO. R-96-48 . 100 3 I 11.11.3. PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXPANSION LOOPING PROJECT ALONG INDIAN RIVER DRIVE SOUTH OF SEBASTIAN CITY LIMIT TO US# 1 - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT - NANCY T. MOON ................. 107 13.A. CHAIRMAN ADAMS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-124 - EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AMENDED ......... 109 13.C. COMMISSIONER MACHT - TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR 58TH AVENUE (KINGS HIGHWAY) .................................. 112 13.E.1. COMMISSIONER TIPPIN - RESOLUTION 2000-125 - MEMBERSHIP OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INCREASED TO INCLUDE A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURING TASK FORCE ...... 113 13.E.2. PATRICK FALLER APPOINTED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURING TASK FORCE..................................................... 115 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ............................. 115 14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................ 115 14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD .......................... 115 4 BK 1 15 PG 238 0* 0 October 3, 2000 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street,. Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, October 3, 2000. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; Ruth Stanbridge; and John W. Tippin. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn was absent. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. INVOCATION I-zr MW 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Administrator Chandler led the Pledge to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Chairman Adams announced anadditionunderCommissioner Macht'smatters, l3.C., concerning 58' Avenue Traffic. October 3, 2000 1 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) added 13.C. to the agenda. S.A. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS None. 6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 5, 2000. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 5, 2000, as written and distributed. 6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 6, 2000 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the First Budget Meeting of September 6, 2000. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the Minutes of the First Budget Meeting of September 6, 2000, as written and distributed. October 3, 2000 - 2 BK 1 15 PG 240 0 0 7. CONSENT AGENDA 7.A. Apjnroval of Warrants _ The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 14, 2000: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of September 7, 2000 to September 14, 2000. Attachment: ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period September 7-14, 2000, as requested. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020740 BRYANT, MILLER AND OLIVE, P A 2000-09-07 33,849.93 0020741 AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA) 2000-09-11 1,125.76 0020742 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-09-11 3,512.04 0020743 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 2000-09-11 1,976.52 0020744 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 2000-09-11 453.60 0020745 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2000-09-11 6,466.34 0020746 HIGHKARK LIFE INSURANCE 2000-09-11 144.10 0020747 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2000-09-11 3,954.86 0020748 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2000-09-11 6,575.00 0020749 KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE 2000-09-13 138.50 0020750 BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR 2000-09-13 115.38 0020751 VELASQUEZ, MERIDA 2000-09-13 200.00 0020752 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2000-09-13 225.00 0020753 IRS - ACS 2000-09-13 50.00 October 3, 2000 3 BK 115 PG 2 41 October 3, 2000 - 4 6K 1 15 PG 242 CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 0020754 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. 2000-09-13 1,965.0078,491.55 002075E INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 2000-09-13 0020756 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 2000-09-13 231.03 0020757 NACO/SOUTHEAST 2000-09-13 8,365.91 444.62 0020758 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 2000-09-13 286.51 0020759 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2000-09-13 23.08 0020760 WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS 2000-09-13 2000-09-13 5,313.70 0020761 FL SDU 2000-09-14 38.52 0289110 ABC-CLIO INC 2000-09-14 48.00 0289111 ACE PLUMBING, INC 2000-09-14 279.56 0289112 ALBERTSONS SOUTHCO #4357 66.68 0289113 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE 2000-09-14 924.00 0289114 AMERICAN CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, 2000-09-14 21.38 0289115 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2000-09-14 1,454.59 0289116 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 2000-09-14 0289117 ABS PUMPS, INC 2000-09-14 3,886.79 191.00 0289118 AQUAGENIX LAND -WATER 2000-09-14 29.95 0289119 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 2000-09-14 0289120 A A ELECTRIC SE, INC 2000-09-14 95.79 0289121 AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT'L 2000-09-14 594.68 0289122 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2000-09-14 484.83 0289123 A -T & T 2000-09-14 37.61 0289124 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE 2000-09-14 45,372.64 0289125 AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE 2000-09-14 60.00 0289126 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000-09-14 58.00 0289127 ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO 2000-09-14 1,057.23 0289128 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC 2000-09-14 534.34 0289129 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 2000-09-14 36.25 0289130 AMERICAN REPORTING 2000-09-14 3,560.00 0289131 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000-09-14 60.00 0289132 APA 2000-09-14 189.00 0289133 A T & T 2000-09-14 54.58 0289134 AMERICAN WATER CHEMICALS, INC 2000-09-14 11,520.00 0289135 A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC 2000-09-14 195.00 0289136 ARCH 2000-09-14 26.49 0289137 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2000-09-14 131.93 0289138 BARTH CONSTRUCTION 2000-09-14 147,798.00 0289139 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2000-09-14 4,655.46 0289140 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 2000-09-14 44,701.78 0289141 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 2000-09-14 2,267.50 0289142 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 2000-09-14 217.07 0289143 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2000-09-14 43.23 0289144 BANKERS INSURANCE CO 2000-09-14 2,574.00 0289145 BLAIS ELECTRIC, INC 2000-09-14 86.38 0289146 BLUE BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-09-14 176.40 0289147 .CROSS BREVARD BOILER CO 2000-09-14 604.60 0289148 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 2000-09-14 166.45 0289149 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 2000-09-14 63.80 0289150 BELLSOUTH 2000-09-14 21,943.40 0289151 BEAZER HOMES, INC 2000-09-14 500.00 0289152 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-09-14 30,813.97 0289153 BOYES & FARINA P A 2000-09-14 4,636.60 0289154 BASS-CARLTON SOD INC 2000-09-14 452.00 0289155 BRYANT, JAMES 0 JR 2000-09-14 144.20 0289156 B & S SOD INC 2000-09-14 220.00 0289153 BANGEL, PAUL G 2000-09-14 7.00 October 3, 2000 - 4 6K 1 15 PG 242 L_J CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289158 BELLSOUTH 2000-09-14 331.83 0289159 C & H DISTRIBUTORS, INC 2000-09-14 1,415.96 0289160 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC 2000-09-14 2.219.79 0289161 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC 2000-09-14 837.65 0289162 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 2000-09-14 297.92 0289163 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS 2000-09-14 1,500.07 0289164 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 2000-09-14 247.09 0289165 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2000-09-14 32,626.92 0289166 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 2000-09-14 8,969.62 0289167 CARTER & VERPLANCK 2000-09-14 428.59 0289168 COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF 2000-09-14 4,743.80 0289169 CLEANNET USA 2000-09-14 20,537.72 0289170 COAST TO COAST JANITOR SVS 2000-09-14 5,448.66 0289171 CULBERT, DANIEL F 2000-09-14 339.00 0289172 CHATTEM, INC 2000-09-14 285.00 0289173 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 2000-09-14 80.03 0289174 CSR AMERICA, INC. 2000-09-14 957.25 0289175 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2000-09-14 199.50 0289176 COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF 2000-09-14 74.97 0289177 COLUMBIA HOUSE 2000-09-14 48.91 0289178 CENTER POINT PUBLISHING 2000-09-14 65.88 0289179 CHANNING CORP 2000-09-14 500.00 0289180 CREATIVE CONCRETE DESIGN, INC 2000-09-14 4,220.00 0289181 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 2000-09-14 137.30 0289182 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 2000-09-14 828.50 0289183 DAVIS, JAMES 2000-09-14 23.20 0289184 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2000-09-14 89.82 0289185 DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC 2000-09-14 64.51 0289186 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC 2000-09-14 10,962.30 0289187 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION 2000-09-14 144.00 0289188 DRUM SERVICE CO OF FLORIDA 2000-09-14 117.80 0289189 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 2000-09-14 1,023.20 0289190 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 2000-09-14 434.08 0289191 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC 2000-09-14 2,160.95 0289192 DELTA PETROLEUM & INDUSTRIAL 2000-09-14 461.50 0289193 DILLER BROWN & ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-09-14 2,153.91 0289194 DADE PAPER COMPANY 2000-09-14 704.88 0289195 DESIGNED TRAFFIC 2000-09-14 15,550.77 0289196 DAVIS, BRENDA 2000-09-14 15.95 0289197 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2000-09-14 63.80 0289198 DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC 2000-09-14 40.00 0289199 DILLARD, CASSIS 2000-09-14 19.31 0289200 DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT 2000-09-14 2,308.74 0289201 DATA COMM WAREHOUSE 2000-09-14 130.97 0289202 DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC 2000-09-14 85.13 0289203 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC 2000-09-14 249.60 0289204 DINENNO, HENRY 2000-09-14 302.00 0289205 DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE 2000-09-14 108.95 0289206 ELLIS K PHELPS AND CO, INC 2000-09-14 488.25 0289207 ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA 2000-09-14 24.95 0289208 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 2000-09-14 1,353.85 0289209 EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE 2000-09-14 1,479.28 0289210 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC 2000-09-14 770.62 0289211 FEDEX 2000-09-14 32.00 0289212 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2000-09-14 157.63 October 3, 2000 5 BK 115 PG 243 • _I CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289213 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO 2000-09-14 265.80 0289214 FLORIDA LEGISLATURE 2000-09-14 788.00 0289215 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2000-09-14 23,995.46 0289216 FLORIDA TODAY/USA TODAY 2000-09-14 176.00 0289217 FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION 2000-09-14 20.00 0289218 FOOT -JOY DRAWER 2000-09-14 3,502.98 0289219 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2000-09-14 143.02 0289220 FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON 2000-09-14 1,132.74 0289221 FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 2000-09-14 100.00 0289222 FLORIDA SECTION A W W A 2000-09-14 180.00 0289223 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2000-09-14 185.00 0289224 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2000-09-14 1,809.11 0289225 FALCON PROPERTIES, LTD 2000-09-14 351,652.55 0289226 FULLER, APRIL L 2000-09-14 19.31 0289227 GALE GROUP, THE 2000-09-14 283.61 0289228 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY 2000-09-14 5.67 0289229 GENE'S AUTO GLASS 2000-09-14 155.99 0289230 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 2000-09-14 213.96 0289231 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-09-14 434.99 0289232 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2000-09-14 64.93 0289233 GYPSUM ASSOCIATION 2000-09-14 14.45 0289234 GRAPHIC DESIGNS INTERNATIONAL 2000-09-14 44.52 0289235 GOLDEN, ROBERT 2000-09-14 42.63 0289236 GOULD, COOKSEY,FENNELL,O'NEILL 2000-09-14 22,455.00 0289237 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2000-09-14 523.38 0289238 HELENA CHEMICAL CO 2000-09-14 1,920.00 0289239 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2000-09-14 18,912.50 0289240 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2000-09-14 450.94 0289241 HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER 2000-09-14 2,083.33 0289242 HUSAINY, TAMER M D 2000-09-14 200.00 0289243 HACH COMPANY 2000-09-14 2,393.55 0289244 HILL MANUFACTURING 2000-09-14 329.66 0289245 HANSEN, SUSAN 2000-09-14 150.80 0289246 HARTWELL SPORTS, INC 2000-09-14 13.67 0289247 HOLMES, EDWARD 2000-09-14 210.00 0289248 HOMEWOOD SUITES 2000-09-14 138.00 0289249 HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL 2000-09-14 86.00 0289250 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-09-14 180,646.02 0289251 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-09-14 140.00 0289252 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-09-14 200.00 0289253 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 2000-09-14 105.00 0289254 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2000-09-14 687.35 0289255 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2000-09-14 332.55 0289256 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BAR ASSOC 2000-09-14 125.00 0289257 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC 2000-09-14 523.55 0289258 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2000-09-14 311.54 0289259 INDIAN RIVER ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2000-09-14 30.00 0289260 INDIAN RIVER MEDICAL 2000-09-14 500.00 0289261 INSURANCE SERVICING & 2000-09-14 1,470.00 0289262 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 2000-09-14 1,170.62 0289263 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2000-09-14 230,494.62 0289264 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY 2000-09-14 120.00 0289265 -INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S 2000-09-14 209.60 0289266 JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 2000-09-14 590.00 0289267 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 2000-09-14 685.01 October 3, 2000 - C. BK 1 15 PG 244 0 0 October 3, 2000 6 BK 115 PG 245 I CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT - NUMBER 2000-09-14 492.44 0289268 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC 2000-09-14 46.35 0289269 JEFFERSON- CHRISTOPHER A 2000-09-14 2,094.00 0289270 JONES CHEMICALS' INC 2000-09-14 219.56 0289271 JEFFERSON, MICHALENE 2000-09-14 922.08 0289272 JONES, CYRIL & ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-09-14 9,657.43 147.68 0289273 KIMLEY-HORN 0289274 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC 2000-09-14 2000-09-14 218.15 0289275 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 2000-09-14 500.00 0289276 K D HEDIN CONSTRUCTION, INC 2000-09-14 1,498.92 0289277 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2000-09-14 83.06 0289278 LEWIS, RUTH A 2000-09-14 6,768.44 0289279 LFI VERO BEACH, INC 2000-09-14 481.98 0289280 LESCO, INC 2000-09-14 45.00 0289281 LAPSCO INC PRINT LIBRARY DISCOUNTER 2000-09-14 25.26 345.11 0289282 LARGE 0289283 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC 2000-09-14 2000-09-14 145.00 0289284 MIKES GARAGE BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC - 09- 200014 29.19 3,115.74 0289285 MILKER 0289286 MUNICIPAL CODE CORP 2000-09-14 2000-09-14 500.00 0289287 MAGANA, IGNACIO M D 2000-09-14 565.87 0289288 MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC 2000-09-14 27,051.75 0289289 MASTELLER & MOLER, INC 2000-09-14 32.48 0289290 MOUTENOT, ANNE HULLER, MINTZ, KORNREICH, 2000-09-14 1,256.24 119.00 0289291 0289292 MAURER, ERMA B, RN 2000-09-14 2000-09-14 382.60 0289293 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 2000-09-14 480.35 0289294 MARC INDUSTRIES 2000-09-14 696.79 0289295 MEZZINA, PATRICIA COMMERCIAL KITCHEN 2000-09-14 283.47 5,000.00 0289296 MELBOURNE 0289297 MITCHELL TRAINING, INC 2000-09-14 2000-09-14 199.50 0289298 MARTIN, CRISTI 2000-09-14 11.58 0289299 MAXWELL, KIMBERLY RECORDS SERVICES, INC 000-09-14 2000-09-14 286.63 375.00 0289300 MEDICAL 0289301 MPI NET MORGAN QUITNO CORPORATION 2000-09-14 97.90 39.15 0289302 0289303 MILLBROOK PRESS, INC 2000-09-14 2000-09-14 79.82 0289304 NACD LEAGUE CITY 2000-09-14 251.25 _ - 0289305 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION 2000-09-14 16.84 0289306 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 2000-09-14 33,369.25 0289307 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 2000-09-14 23.70 0289308 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO 2000-09-14 43.50 0289309 NATIONAL TECHNICAL 2000-09-14 520.16 0289310 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY 2000-09-14 84.00 0289311 NU CO 2, INC 2000-09-14 27.26 0289312 NAPIER, WILLIAM MATT 2000-09-14 231.04 0289313 NORTRAX EQUIPMENT COMPANY 2000-09-14 20.00 0289314 NFSES PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2000-09-14 486.72 163.59 0289315 OFFICE 2000-09-14 0289316 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 2000-09-14 17,341.61 0289317 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST _ 14 93.27 0289318 ORLANDO SENTINEL COMMUNICATION 2000-09-14 162.59 0289319 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC 2000-09-14 163.00 0289320 PERKINS DRUG, INC154.56 INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2000-09-14 17,823,00 0289321 PERKINS TITLE OF 2000-09-14 0289322 PROFESSIONAL October 3, 2000 6 BK 115 PG 245 I CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289323_ POSTMASTER 2000-09-14 15,000.00 0289324 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 2000-09-14 480.17 0289325 PLEZALL WIPERS, INC 2000-09-14 110.29 0289326 PERCONTI DATA SYSTEMS, INC 2000-09-14 5.00 0289327 PAGE, LIVINGSTON 2000-09-14 210.00 0289328 PRECISION CONTRACTING 2000-09-14 3,225.90 0289329 PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY 2000-09-14 9.90 0289330 PRECISE POWER, INC 2000-09-14 550.00 0289331 PERMA-FIX 2000-09-14 3,597.00 0289332 PRACTICE HOUSE GOLF, INC 2000-09-14 29.57 0289333 RADIOSHACK 2000-09-14 67.46 0289334 RINGHAVER 2000-09-14 185.60 0289335 RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC 2000-09-14 307.50 0289336 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 2000-09-14 7,891.16 0289337 ROSEN PLAZA HOTEL 2000-09-14 238.00 0289338 RAYSIDE TRUCK AND TRAILER 2000-09-14 7,890.00 0289339 RECORDED BOOKS INC 2000-09-14 7.95 0289340 RAPP, PAMELA 2000-09-14 24.00 0289341 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2000-09-14 99.35 0289342 ROMANO, CHRISTINA 2000-09-14 19.31 0289343 RICKMON, MILDRED 2000-09-14 500.00 - - 0289344 SCOTTY'S, INC 2000-09-14 15.65 0289345 SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE 2000-09-14 50.00 0289346 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 2000-09-14 609.59 0289347 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2000-09-14 147.53 0289348 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC 2000-09-14 283.75 0289349 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 2000-09-14 348.67 0289350 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2000-09-14 180.00 0289351 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC 2000-09-14 75.59 0289352 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES 2000-09-14 1,648.62 0289353 ST JOHN'S RIVER WATER MGMT DST 2000-09-14 700.00 0289354 SPEEGLE CONSTRUCTION, INC 2000-09-14 64,477.65 0289355 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2000-09-14 675.37 0289356 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 2000-09-14 24,429.14 0289357 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2000-09-14 2,008.00 0289358 SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL 2000-09-14 769.95 0289359 SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA 2000-09-14 504.00 0289360 SUTHER AND SERVICES INC 2000-09-14 520.00 0289361 STERLING SOLUTIONS INC 2000-09-14 600.00 0289362 SAMARITAN CENTER 2000-09-14 5,075.45 0289363 STEWART, SARAH LYNN 2000-09-14 19.31 0289364 STALHUT, SHANNON 2000-09-14 56.00 0289365 SPORTY'S SHOPS 2000-09-14 14.95 0289366 TARMAC AMERICA INC 2000-09-14 207.00 0289367 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-09-14 595.00 0289368 TITLEIST DRAWER 2000-09-14 1,148.25 0289369 TRANSPORTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 2000-09-14 4,775.00 0289370 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL 2000-09-14 125.00 0289371 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 2000-09-14 494.60 0289372 TEMPACO OF TREASURE COAST 2000-09-14 211.18 0289373 TRANS PARTS CENTER OF SOUTH 2000-09-14 314.23 0289374 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2000-09-14 6,499.44 0289375 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2000-09-14 759.00 0289376 TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOOK CLUB 2000-09-14 66.39 0289377 _T C BILLING CORPORATION 2000-09-14 12,969.27 0289378 TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS INC 2000-09-14 493.25 0289379 TREASURE COAST REFUSE 2000-09-14 74.25 0289380 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-09-14 1,139.90 October 3, 2000 - 8 BK 1 15 PG 246 0 0 • CHECK NAME CHECK -SCK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289381 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-09-14 297.00 0289382 THYSSEN MIAMI ELEVATOR 2000-09-14 1,958.00 0289383 RITA TALBOT AND DOUGLAS TUTTLE 2000-09-14 -x-000.00 0289384 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA/ 2000-09-14 18.95 0289385 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2000-09-14 9,877.54 0289386 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 2000-09-14 3,979.80 0289387 VELDE FORD, INC 2000-09-14 24.13 0289388 VERO BEACH PRINTING INC 2000-09-14 - 736.50 0289389 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-09-14 51,206.38 0289390 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-09-14 132.00 0289391 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC 2000-09-14 62.50 0289392 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC 2000-09-14 2,038.54 0289393 VERO MOTEL 2000-09-14 115.90 0289394 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-09-14 85.00 0289395 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2000-09-14 201.01 0289396 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 2000-09-14 940.47 0289397 VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO 2000-09-14 24.76 0289398 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-09-14 22.68 0289399 WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608 2000-09-14 632.23 0289400 WALSH, LYNN 2000-09-14 39.88 0289401 WHEELER, GARY C _ 2000-09-14 10,016.11 0289402 WIGINTON FIRE SPRINKLERS,INC 2000-09-14 450.00 0289403 WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC 2000-09-14 33.08 0289404 WILLHOFF, PATSY 2000-09-14 104.00 0289405 WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC 2000-09-14 433.50 0289406 WTTB AM 1490 2000-09-14 375.00 0289407 WATERWORKS CAR WASH 2000-09-14 186.50 0289408 WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642 2000-09-14 169.75 0289409 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2000-09-14 839.25 0289410 WILSON, SUSAN BARNES 2000-09-14 293.55 0289411 W W GRAINGER INC 2000-09-14 474.14 0289412 XEROX CORPORATION 2000-09-14 791.05 0289413 YAVORSKY'S TRUCK SERVICE,INC 2000-09-14 69.03 0289414 YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 2000-09-14 218.72 0289415 MILLER, JOSEPH 2000-09-14 180.54 0289416 WODTKE, RUSSELL 2000-09-14 - 887.10 0289417 LICARI, LINDA 2000-09-14 226.34 0289418 MERCURI, DEBRA 2000-09-14 243.07 0289419 ROYAL, THOMAS 2000-09-14 478.90 October 3, 2000 1,872,952.33 BK 115 PG 247 • I 7.B. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 21, 2000: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of September 15, 2000 to September 21, 2000. Attachment: ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the period September 15-21, 2000, as requested. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020762 TUCKER, TARA N 2000-09-15 3,072.00 0020763 JONES, CYRIL 2000-09-18 676.19 0020764 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 2000-09-19 3,883.53 0289420 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-09-21 589.75 0289421 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2000-09-21 3,167.20 0289422 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC 2000-09-21 125.00 0289423 ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE 2000-09-21 435.00 0289424 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO 2000-09-21 96.91 0289425 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2000-09-21 51.00 0289426 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 2000-09-21 597.30 0289427 ASS PUMPS, INC 2000-09-21 763.30 0289428 ALL POWER SERVICES, INC 2000-09-21 4,304.00 0289429 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 2000-09-21 87.00 0289430 ADDISON OIL CO 2000-09-21 718.27 0289431 - AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT'L 2000-09-21 2,680.85 0289432 A P C O INTERNATIONAL INC 2000-09-21 1,070.00 0289433 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2000-09-21 103.75 October 3, 2000 - 10 BKl15PG248 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOK 0289434 ADAMS, FRAN B 2000-09-21 300.20 0289435 A T & T 2000-09-21 77.60 0289436 ALL INDIAN RIVER FENCE CO 2000-09-21 140.00 0289437 ALBERTSON'S 2000-09-21 124.,50 0289438 ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO 2000-09-21 0289439 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC 2000-09-21 23.95 1,046.79 0289440 APPERSON CHEMICALS,INC 2000-09-21 3,225.79 0289441 AVIS 0289442 ARCH 2000-09-21 90.59 0289443 A T & T 2000-09-21 965.24 0289444 AMERITREND HOMES 2000-09-21 18.31 0289445 AKE, RICHARD -CLERK OF CIRCUIT 0-09-21 2000-09-21 500.00 0289446 ABC AUDIOBOOKS FOR CHILDREN 2000-09-21 5.00 0289447 AMERICAN COMPLIANCE 2000-09-21 30.00 0289448 AMERICAN PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL 2000-09-21 58,049.00 0289449 AMERICAN MAP CORP 2000-09-21 48.00 0289450 ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC 2000-09-21 65.23 0289451 B & B INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 2000-09-21 22.80 0289452 BARTON, JEFFREY K _CLEAR 2000-09-21 118.07 1,633.50 0289453 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 2000-09-21 0289454 BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-09-21 16.75 0289455 BRUGNOLI, ROBERT J PHD 500.00 0289456 BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC 2000-09-21 500.00 0289457 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC 2000-09-21 465.71 30,465.17 0289458 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2000-09-21 0289459 BRODART CO 2000-09-21 370.99 0289460 SLAIS ELECTRIC, INC 2000-09-21 1,939.63 0289461 HFI WASTE SYSTEMS 2000-09-21 75.00 0289462 BEVERAGE STOP, THE 2000-09-21 104.99 0289463 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 9-21 70.00 0289464 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2000-09-21 15.00 0289465 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 2000-09-21 19.59 0289466 BELLSOUTH 2000-09-21 16.83 61515.85 0289467 BOBCAT OF ORLANDO 2000-09-21 130.00 0289468 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 2000-09-21 16,765.81 0289469 BARTON, JEFFREY K 2000-09-21 31.00 0289470 BANK OF NEW YORK 2000-09-21 1,635.05 0289471 BRANDON CAPITAL CORPORATION 2000-09-21 642.50 0289472 BAKER, PAMELA A 2000-09-21 900.00 0289473 BRANTLEY, RICHARD A 2000-09-21 1,350.00 0289474 BROWN & BROWN INSURANCE 2000-09-21 377.00 0289475 BROADCASTERS GENERAL STORE 2000-09-21 0289476 SAILLARGEON, LEE 2000-09-21 2,068.28 0289477 BOND, EDWIN 2000-09-21 457.58 0289478 BELLSOUTH 2000-09-21 120.00 0289479 BERNS, ALAN S M D 2000-09-21 2,076.42 0289480 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC 2000-09-21 2,956.56 48,700.82 0289481 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 0289482 14,768.46 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO., INC 0289483 2000-09-21 178.06 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT co, INC 2000-09-21 88.57 0289484 CITRUS MOTEL 0289485 2000-09-21 160.00 COASTAL GRAPHICS 0289486 2000-09-21 96.00 COLLINS, WILLIAM G II 0289487 2000-09-21 568.34 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 0289488 2000-09-21 1,490.62 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E 0289489 2000-09-21 80.50 COX, DAVID B 0289490 CHEMSEARCH 2000-09-21 91.30 2000-09-21 255.03 October 3, 2000 11 6K 115 PG 249 • I CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289491 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2000-09-21 916.09 0289492 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 2000-09-21 9,525.99 0289493 CLOVE HITCH FOUND, INC 2000-09-21 300.00 0289494 CANADY, LARRY J 2000-09-21 500.00 0289495 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 2000-09-21 48.45 0289496 CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL 2000-09-21 75.00 0289497 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY 2000-09-21 197.01 0289498 CALL ONE, INC 2000-09-21 25.00 0289499 CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO 2000-09-21 13,016.84 0289500 CRAWFORD, SANDY 2000-09-21 32.00 0289501 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2000-09-21 313.50 0289502 CLE INTERNATIONAL 2000-09-21 105.00 0289503 CHANDLER, JILL M 2000-09-21 1,687.96 0289504 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2000-09-21 1,757.43 0289505 COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC 2000-09-21 10,000.00 0289506 COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC 2000-09-21 10,000.00 0289507 CITGO PETROLEUM CORP 2000-09-21 3,644.51 0289508 CHANNING CORP 2000-09-21 500.00 0289509 CLARK, DEXTER 2000-09-21 163.00 0289510 CREATIVE CONCRETE DESIGN, INC 2000-09-21 1,050.00 0289511 CHRIS KOHL TRAINING & 2000-09-21 3,200.00 - - 0289512 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 2000-09-21 806.09 0289513 DAVIS, JAMES 2000-09-21 104.20 0289514 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2000-09-21 113.84 0289515 DEMCO INC 2000-09-21 197.96 0289516 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 2000-09-21 1,643.66 0289517 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 2000-09-21 25.00 0289518 DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC 2000-09-21 255.49 0289519 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 2000-09-21 480.39 0289520 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC 2000-09-21 2,655.60 0289521 DADE.PAPER COMPANY 2000-09-21 657.42 0289522 DILLARD, CASSIE 2000-09-21 38.62 0289523 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC 2000-09-21 990.10 0289524 E G P, INC 2000-09-21 155.92 0289525 ELPEX, INC 2000-09-21 1,054.45 0289526 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 2000-09-21 1,135.50 0289527 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC - 2000-09-21 140.00 0289528 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2000-09-21 133.95 0289529 FLORIDA CITY & COUNTY 2000-09-21 200.00 0289530 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO 2000-09-21 653.25 0289531 FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY 2000-09-21 249.00 0289532 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2000-09-21 48,345.77 0289533 FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC 2000-09-21 3,339.00 0289534 FLORIDA WATER RESOURCES 2000-09-21 470.70 0289535 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2000-09-21 28.69 0289536 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC 2000-09-21 1,575.00 0289537 FLINN, SHEILA I 2000-09-21 336.00 0289538 FLOW -TECHNOLOGY 2000-09-21 148.99 0289539 FLORIDA TRANSCOR, INC 2000-09-21 1,006.90 0289540 FAIRWINDS TRAVEL & TOURS 2000-09-21 389.00 0289541 FELLSMERE, CITY OF 2000-09-21 61.27 0289542 FLORIDA DATABASE SYSTEMS, INC 2000-09-21 12,700.00 0289543 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC 2000-09-21 249.30 0289544 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2000-09-21 74.39 0289545 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2000-09-21 1,005.00 0289546- FULLER, APRIL L 2000-09-21 38.62 0289547 FOSTER, JIMMIE ERWIN 2000-09-21 110.00 0289548 FRANKLIN RESEARCH GROUP 2000-09-21 895.00 October 3, 2000 - 12 BK 115 PG 250 U CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289549 GALE GROUP, THE 2000-09-21 687.73 0289550 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC 2000-09-21 859.43 0289551 GENE'S AUTO GLASS 2000-09-21 185.00 0289552 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-09-21 53.59 0289553 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2000-09-21 643.16 0289554 GREEN, NORMAN A 2000-09-21 1,039-09 0289555 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 2000-09-21 255.08 0289556 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTS 2000-09-21 9,807.18 0289557 GOLD COAST PROFESSIONAL 2000-09-21 225.00 0289558 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS 2000-09-21 8,441.81 0289559 GOLDEN, ROBERT 2000-09-21 69.45 0289560 HAMMOND & SMITH, P A 2000-09-21 10,450.00 0289561 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2000-09-21 60.49 0289562 HELENA CHEMICAL CO 2000-09-21 936.25 0289563 HUGHES SUPPLY, INC 2000-09-21 890.00 0289564 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2000-09-21 420.24 0289565 HELMET HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 2000-09-21 500.00 0289566 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 2000-09-21 138.00 0289567 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 2000-09-21 766.00 0289568 HACH COMPANY 2000-09-21 895.50 0289569 HILL MANUFACTURING 2000-09-21 200.00 0289570 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2000-09-21 173.27 0289571 HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER 2000-09-21 298.50 0289572 HEAVYQUIP 2000-09-21 5,338.97 0289573 HEALTHY START COALITION OF 2000-09-21 40.00 0289574 THE HOPE CO 2000-09-21 500.00 0289575 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-09-21 70.00 0289576 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2000-09-21 9,772,25 0289577 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000-09-21 150.00 0289578 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC 2000-09-21 1,063.10 0289579 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2000-09-21 161.29 0289580 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2000-09-21 827.61 0289581 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2000-09-21 13,958.05 0289582 INDUSTRIAL REFUSE SALES 2000-09-21 18,240.00 0289583 INDIAN RIVER ROOFING INC 2000-09-21 4,350.00 0289584 INDIAN RIVER MRI, ASSOC. 2000-09-21 280.00 0289585 IBM CORPORATION 2000-09-21 979.97 0289586 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 2000-09-21 89.48 0289587 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES 2000-09-21 9.59 0289588 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE 2000-09-21 73,621.15 0289589 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE_ 2000-09-21 125,340.76 0289590 IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2000-09-21 888.97 0289591 INDIAN RIVER SHORES POLICE 2000-09-21 25.00 0289592 IGM LTD 2000-09-21 4,426.08 0289593 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 2000-09-21 8,048.34 0289594 JACKSON ELECTRONICS 2000-09-21 18.13 0289595 JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC 2000-09-21 593.29 0289596 JIMMY'S TREE SERVICE, INC 2000-09-21 3,037.99 0289597 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2000-09-21 1,259.59 0289598 JOHNSON, ANSELMO, MURDOCK, 2000-09-21 2,574.74 0289599 JUVENILE WELFARE BOARD 2000-09-21 25.00 0289600 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 2000-09-21 638.00 0289601 KELLY TRACTOR CO 2000-09-21 270.47 0289602 KLUCINEC, MONA 2000-09-21 65.97 0289603 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING 2000-09-21 1,770.00 0289604 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2000-09-21 1,483.29 0289605 LUCAS WATERPROOFING CO, INC 2000-09-21 350.00 0289606 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2000-09-21 4,256.51 0289607 L B SMITH, INC 2000-09-21 1,506.02 October 3, 2000 13 BK 1 15 PG 25 1 I r October 3, 2000 - 14 BHIi5PG252 0 0 CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 0289608 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES 2000-09-21 121.29 0289609 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC 2000-09-21 116.14 0289610 LvB BRYAN & COMPANY 2000-09-21 1,461.00 0289611 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 2000-09-21 118.70 0289612 LES CAMELA, ELISA M 2000-09-21 311.50 25.00 0289613 LEWIS, TAMMY 2000-09-21 13.50 0289614 MAXWELL PLUMING, INC 2000-09-21 105.00 0289615 MIKES GARAGE 2000-09-21 60.00 0289616 MOODY TIRE, INC 2000-09-21 3,425.76 0289617 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & 2000-09-21 3,325.00 0289618 MASTELLER, MOLER & REED, INC 2000-09-21 3,703.38 0289619 MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC 2000-09-21 750.00 0289620 MIRANDA, FERNANDO G MD 2000-09-21 0289621 MPI NET 2000-09-21 101.70 0289622 MERCURY TECHNOLOGIES 2000-09-21 193.97 0289623 MANTZ, RUSSELL J 2000-09-21 29.01 0289624 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 2000-09-21 34.60 0289625 MARC INDUSTRIES 2000-09-21 362.70 0289626 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2000-09-21 500.00 0289627 MARTIN, CRISTI 2000-09-21 479.50 0289628 MAXWELL, KIMBERLY 2000-09-21 23.17 0289629 MAILMANN, THE 2000-09-21 8,863.84 - - 0289630 MYFAMILY.COM 2000-09-21 35.96 0289631 MITER, DAVID 2000-09-21 5.00 0289632 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY 2000-09-21 119.22 0289633 NAZTECH, INC 2000-09-21 684.00 0289634 NOEL, THOMAS 2000-09-21 28.32 0289635 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2000-09-21 766.68 0289636 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 2000-09-21 915.62 0289637 OFFICE MAX 2000-09-21 119.80 0289638 O'NEIL, LEE & WEST 2000-09-21 9,435.53 0289639 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC 2000-09-21 28.30 0289640 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2000-09-21 63.08 0289641 PETTY CASH 2000-09-21 315.14 0289642 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION 2000-09-21 500.00 0289643 PETTY CASH 2000-09-21 98.95 0289644 PETRILLA, FRED J, PHD 2000-09-21 6.00 0289645 PROFESSIONAL TITLE OF -2000-09-21 10,000.00 0289646 PORT PETROLEUM, INC 2000-09-21 1,561.02 0289647 PERCONTI DATA SYSTEMS, INC 2000-09-21 2,500.00 0289648 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2000-09-21 246.52 0289649 PARK, LYNN 2000-09-21 140.56 0289650 PUBLIX PHARMACY 2000-09-21 88.62 0289651 PROFORMA 2000-09-21 226.98 0289652 P B S & J 2000-09-21 550.00 0289653 RADIOSHACK 2000-09-21 11.87 0289654 RINGHAVER 2000-09-21 11,815.64 0289655 RADISSON HOTEL 2000-09-21 79.00 0289656 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC 2000-09-21 1,432.31 0289657 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 2000-09-21 5,503.89 0289658 RIORDAN, MICHAEL C PSY.D. 2000-09-21 800.00 0289659 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC 2000-09-21 5.95 0289660 R & G SOD FARMS 2000-09-21 160.00 0289661 RELIABLE TRANSMISSION SERVICE 2000-09-21 43.53 0289662 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 2000-09-21 98.32 0289663 WGELINE TAPPING SERVICE INC 2000-09-21 500.00 0289664 RESOURCE MEDIA GROUP INC 2000-09-21 79.00 0289665 RAPP, PAMELA 2000-09-21 12.00 October 3, 2000 - 14 BHIi5PG252 0 0 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289666 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 2000-09-21 2,301.66 0289667 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2000-09-21 227.61 0289668 RIVERSIDE LEASING CO 2000-09-21 614.00 0289669 RASMUSSEN, KARA 2000-09-21 149.34 0289670 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC 2000-09-21 144_.36 0289671 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION 2000-09-21 399.70 0289672 SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE 2000-09-21 60.00 0289673 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 2000-09-21 301.45 0289674 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC 2000-09-21 38.75 0289675 STEIL, HOLLY 2000-09-21 42.92 0289676 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC 2000-09-21 69.94 0289677 SAFESPACE INC 2000-09-21 1,250.00 0289678 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY 2000-09-21 31.91 0289679 SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC 2000-09-21 37.00 0289680 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 2000-09-21 535.33 0289681 SUPERIOR PRINTING 2000-09-21 1,054.95 0289682 SAFECO, INC 2000-09-21 685.60 0289683 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2000-09-21 585.83 0289684 STAMM MANUFACTURING 2000-09-21 380.86 0289685 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO 2000-09-21 265.40 0289686 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2000-09-21 90.90 0289687 STAGE & SCREEN 2000-09-21 30.65 0289688 STEIN & CO., INC. 2000-09-21 1,840.00 0289689 SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC 2000-09-21 107,158.09 0289690 SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS 2000-09-21 808.49 0289691 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-09-21 25.00 0289692 SUNICA DEVELOPMENT 2000-09-21 1,300.00 0289693 SUMMERLIN SEVEN SEAS INC 2000-09-21 2,800.00 0289694 STEVENS-KOENIG REPORTING 2000-09-21 246.35 0289695 SUNCOAST COUNSELING & 2000-09-21 1,075.00 0289696 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST 2000-09-21 700.00 0289697 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST 2000-09-21 700.00 0289698 SAMMARTANO, ANTONINO 2000-09-21 48.15 0289699 SHELL CREDIT CARD CENTER 2000-09-21 677.96 0289700 SAVE THE MOMENT 2000-09-21 46.00 0289701 ST LUCIE COUNTY BOARD 2000-09-21 47,651.63 0289702 STEWART, SARAH LYNN 2000-09-21 38.62 0289703 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 2000-09-21 3,714.53 0289704 THOMAS, JOHN C 2000-09-21 1,350.00 0289705 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING 2000-09-21 25,200.00 0289706 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC 2000-09-21 12,299.72 0289707 TEXACE CORP 2000-09-21 2,287.45 0289708 TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES 2000-09-21 50.47 0289709 THERMOGAS COMPANY 2000-09-21 164.54 0289710 TRAVEL BY PEGASUS 2000-09-21 410.00 0289711 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-09-21 71.91 0289712 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2000-09-21 1,687.64 0289713 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2000-09-21 400.00 0289714 ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT 2000-09-21 728.61 0289715 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2000-09-21 5,457.70 0289716 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC 2000-09-21 2_,165.40 0289717 UNITED SIGN CO 2000-09-21 170.81 0289718 VELDE FORD, INC 2000-09-21 822.38 0289719 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-09-21 25.00 0289720 VERO BEACH, CITY OF 2000-09-21 7,884.15 0289721 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC 2000-09-21 2,054.72 0289722 VERO MARINE CENTER, INC 2000-09-21 17.50 0289723 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-09-21 6,537.32 October 3, 2000 15 BK 115 PG 253 • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0289724 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000-09-21 6,562.32 0289725 _ VERO BEARING & BOLT 2000-09-21 182.18 0289726 VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER 2000-09-21 25.00 0289727 VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO 2000-09-21 663.92 0289728 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-09-21 606.99 0289729 WAL-MART STORES, INC 2000-09-21 369.61 0289730 WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC 2000-09-21 40.00 0289731 WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC 2000-09-21 73.62 0289732 WILLHOFF, PATSY 2000-09-21 130.00 0289733 WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC 2000-09-21 148.50 0289734 WHEELER, GARY SHERIFF 2000-09-21 14,461.65 0289735 WRAP N' SHIP 2000-09-21 18.46 0289736 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2000-09-21 1,662.00 0289737 WELLS, CARLOS L, ESQ 2000-09-21 241.79 0289738 W. W. GRAINGER INC 2000-09-21 73.13 0289739 W C G, INC 2000-09-21 999.75 0289740 WILLIAM GLOVER INC 2000-09-21 83,701.02 0289741 WILSON, STEVEN 2000-09-21 30.90 0289742 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2000-09-21 147.57 0289743 LYKE, BONNIE 2000-09-21 55.62 0289744 MGB CONSTRUCTION, INC 2000-09-21 137.85 0289745 FBO PUTTICK TRUST 2000-09-21 107.45 0289746 SANDOR, RAYMOND 2000-09-21 20.94 0289747 BALLARD, MARK 2000-09-21 33.60 0289748 ARENA, ROCCO 2000-09-21 16.59 0289749 RENTA JR, EFIGENIO 2000-09-21 86.23 0289750 JENSEN, KEITH & LENA 2000-09-21 42.51 0289751 KNAPP, JR EUGENE 2000-09-21 37.15 0289752 FRIEDLAND, SHELDON 2000-09-21 88.72 0289753 SEA OAKS INVESTMENT LTD 2000-09-21 67.92 0289754 CHAMBERLAIN, JOAN 2000-09-21 44.78 0289755 BROWNE, PATRICIA 2000-09-21 31.78 0289756 GALL, KIM 2000-09-21 59.29 0289757 DAVIDSON, RUFUS 2000-09-21 82.56 0289758 TOMAC OF FLORIDA 2000-09-21 22.64 0289759 BEAZER HOMES 2000-09-21 37.15 0289760 LIZ CLAIBORNE 2000-09-21 26.41 0289761 CROOM CONSTRUCTION 2000-09-21 37.15 0289762 M E GOOD REALTY 2000-09-21 27.82 0289763 ELLIS, JOHN 2000-09-21 9.99 0289764 BOB LAPORTE CONSTRUCTION 2000-09-21 48.36 0289765 KANTENGA, KALOMBO 2000-09-21 16.08 0289766 EMERICK, PAT 2000-09-21 30.95 0289767 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2000-09-21 70.35 0289768 HUTH, RICHARD M 2000-09-21 45.93 0289769 MCGUIGAN, JAMES & PAT 2000-09-21 44.53 0289770 PARVUS, DIRK 2000-09-21 23.69 0289771 BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA INC 2000-09-21 58.52 0289772 SKINNER, DOUGLAS W 2000-09-21 14.47 0289773 TEAGUE, ANTHONYD & LORETTA 2000-09-21 27.14 0289774 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 2000-09-21 40.65 0289775 TREICHLER, JASON 2000-09-21 25.61 0289776 AMERITREND HOMES 2000-09-21 125.91 0289777 SMITH, BETTINA 2000-09-21 58.28 0289778 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR LTD 2000-09-21 75.78 0289779 BENTON, ANGELA 2000-09-21 27.12 October 3, 2000 - 16 BK 1 15 PG 254 F • CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 0289780 MC KINNEY, COY LEE 2000-09-21 51.82 0289781 BARONE, JODI 2000-09-21 45.53 0289782 KEMPF, DAVID 2000-09-21 44.17_ 0289783 FADIN, SUHAIL H 2000-09-21 80.05 0289784 NIEHAUS, CHARLOTTE 2000-09-21 66.76 0289785 HENNING, JEFFREY 2000-09-21 74.68 0289786 DEADY, SUSAN J 2000-09-21 40.03 0289787 SORRENTINO, MARY 2000-09-21 71.96 0289788 PRATT, TRACY 2000-09-21 16.99 1,122,967.45 7. C. O Tice of Tax Collector - Recapitulation Report of Errors and Insolvencies for the 1999 Tax Roll The Board reviewed a Letter of August 30, 2000: Board of County Commissioners Attention: Chairman Fran Adams 1840 25w Street Vero Beach. FL 32%0 RE: Recapitulation Report of Errors and Insolvencies for the 1999 Tax Roll Dear Mrs. Adams: Please find attached the recapitulation report. which we request be signed and forwarded to the Clerk of Covet Once the Clerk of Court has signed, please send one original to my office. If 1 may be of further assistance, please advise. October 3, 2000 17 BK 115 PG 255 • I ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) authorized signing of the Recapitulation Report of Errors and Insolvencies, as requested. 7.D. Economic OMortunities Council -Acceptance o Resignation of Dorothy Thomas The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 26, 2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: APPOEWrMENT TO THE ECONONUC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL FROM: Kimberly E. g Executive Aide to the Commission DESCRIPTON AND CONDITION Norma Mooney, Sebastian, has submitted her resume for consideration for the vacant position on the Economic Opportunities Council (EOC), Recommend that the Board appoint Nora Mooney to fill the vacant position on the EOC Attachment: - Nora Mooney's Resume ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) accepted the oral resignation of Dorothy Thomas from the Economic Opportunities Council. October 3, 2000 BK 1 15 PG 256 IL 18 F 0 0 7.E. Economic Opportunities Council - Appointment of Norma Mooney to Fill Vacant Position The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 26, 2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: RESIGNATION FROM ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL FROM: Kimberly E. MaA ung Executive Aide to the Commission DESCRIPTON AND CONDITION Jean Strawter, Executive Director of the Economic Opportunities Council (EOC) of Indian River County has notified the Commission Office that Mrs. Dorothy Thomas has given her oral resignation as shown in the attached minutes. RECOMMENTATION Recommend that the Board accept her oral resignation. Attachment: - Nfmutes from EOC meeting of July 9, 1998 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Grin absent) appointed Norma Mooney to the Economic Opportunities Council. October 3, 2000 19 BK 1 15 PG 257 7.F. Out -of -County Travel - Florida Association of Counties 2001 Legislative Coherence - November 15-17.2000 - Tallahassee The Board reviewed the information presented in the backup for the meeting. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved out -of -county travel for Commissioners to the Florida Association of Counties (FACo) 2001 Legislative Conference to be held November 15-17, 2000, in Tallahassee. 7.G. Children's ServicesAdvisory Committee -Resignation ofSh ff Gary C. Wheeler as an Ex Officio Member The Board reviewed a letter dated September 22, 2000: The Honorable Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman September 22, 2000 Childrens Services Advisory Committee 1840 25'6 Street Vero Beach, Fl 32960-3365 Dear Mr. Macht: This letter will serve as my resignation from the Children Services Advisory Committee due to the recent election and upcoming change of Sheriff. Being a charter member of this committee, I have enjoyed sexing the progress this committee has made in helping children of our community. I wish you and the other members continued success in your endeavors. Sincerely, 47 (2 -W4 -4 - Gary C. Wheeler, Sheriff October 3, 2000 20 BK 115 PG 258 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) accepted the resignation of Sheriff Gary C. Wheeler from the Children's Services Advisory Committee. M. Children's Services Advisory Committee - Appointment of SheriffElect Roy Raymond as an Ex Officio Member The Board reviewed a letter of September 27, 2000: September 27, 2000 Mr. Roy Raymond, Sheriff Elect 12510 87"' Street Fellsmere, Florida 32948 Reference: Children's Services Advisory Committee Membership Dear Sheriff Ele aymond: As Chairman of the Indian River County Children's Services Advisory Committee, am delighted to welcome you as a voting (ex -officio) member of this committee. Indian River County Ordinance formed the Children's Services Advisory Committee with the purpose of addressing the needs of children in this community_ There are also two Sub -Committees, the Needs Assessment Sub -Committee and the Grant Review Sub -Committee. The Indian River County assigned Joyce Johnston -Carlson, Director of Human Services and her staff to address the needs of this Committee. Please contact her at 567-8000, Extensions 467 or 524, for additional information. Zneth . Macht, Chairman Children's Services Advisory Committee October 3, 2000 21 BK 115 PG 259 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) appointed Sheriff Elect Roy Raymond as an ex officio member of the Children's Services Advisory Committee. U Resolution No. 2000-117 - Partial Release of Easement at 7340 33rd Avenue (Lot 32,Co�velands Landing Subdivision, Ph. 11 - Requested by Lawrence M. Thomas The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 19, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DEP MENT HEAD CONCURRE CE: Ro ert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Director THROUGH: Roland M. DeBlois AICP Chief, Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement FROM: Kelly Zedek Code Enforcement Officer DATE: 09/19/2000 RE: LAWRENCE M. THOMAS REQUEST FOR PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT AT 7340 33RD AVE. (LOT 32, COPELANDS LANDING SUBDMSION, PHASE n It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 3, 2000. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County ltas been petitioned by LAWRENCE M. THOMAS, owner of a lot at 7340 33rd Avenue, for release of a five foot portion of a twenty-five foot wide drainage and utility easement. October 3, 2000 - 22 BK 1 15 PG 260 • The purpose of the partial easement release request is to allow for an existing swimming pool foundation and screen enclosure that was in advertently built within the easement (see attached maps). ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The request has been reviewed by Bell South Communications, Florida Power & Light Corporation; T.C.I. Cable Corporation; the Indian River County Utilities Department; the Copelands Landing Property Owners Association (POA), the County Road & Bridge and Engineering Divisions; and the County surveyor. None of those agencies has any objection to the proposed partial easement release. The subject drainage easement is dedicated to the Copelands Landing POA for maintenance purposes. Although the POA has indicated no objection to the partial easement release, the applicant will need to obtain a formal release of the easement portion from the POA as well as the County. If the Board approves the partial easement release, staff will advise the applicant, via a comment on an easement release approval letter, of the applicant's need to obtain the formal POA RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the attached resolution, release the westerly five-foot portion of the rear drainage and utility easement of Lot 32 of Copelands Landing Subdivision Phase I, as more particularly described in said resolution. ATTACHMENTS I . Proposed County Resolution Abandoning Easement (Portion thereof) 2. Map(s) depicting easement portion proposed for release ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution 2000-117 releasing a portion of an easement on Lot 32, COPELANDS LANDING SUBDIVISION PHASE 1. October 3, 2000 23 Un 115 PG 1 F, 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-117 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT ON LOT 32, COPELANDS LANDING SUBDIVSION PHASE I WHEREAS, Indian River County has interest in a drainage and utility easement on Lot 32, of Copelands Landing Subdivision, Phase 1; and WHEREAS, the retention of a portion of the easement, as described below, serves no public purpose; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: This partial release of easement is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, Grantor, to LAWRENCE M. THOMAS & PHYLLIS K. THOMAS 7340 33RD AVE. VERO BEACH, FL 32967 their successors in interest, heirs and assigns, as Grantees, as follows: Indian River County does hereby release and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may have in the following described easement(s): the westerlyfiveJeet, less the northerly tenjeet, of the easterly twenty -dive foot wide drainage and utility easement of Lot 32, Copeland's Landing Subdivision, Phase 1, according to the plat theregJ, as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 22 and 22,4 of the Public Records oj Indian River County, Florida. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner T i D D i n , seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d a e , and adopted on the _3 r d day of October 2000, by the following vote: Commissioner Fran B. Adams A y e Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn _ Abs n t Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht A y p Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye 7 Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 262 24 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2 0 0 0 -1 1 7 The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of October ,2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bye Ci.,4,— Fran B. Adams ChaiV Attested By: Deputy Clerk STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 r d day of October 2000, by FRAN B. ADAMS, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, and byPATRICIA M. RIDGELY , Deputy Clerk for JEFFREY K. BARTON, Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who are personally known to me. NOTARY PUBLIC - Printed Name. Kimberly E. M a s s u n g MY commam It CCum filDl14 2M �S Commission No.: C C 8 5 5 4 3 6 tai F Commission Expiration: July 15, 2003 ' APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIE�CY: William G. Collins II Deputy County Attorney cau.doc proj/apl. no. 9904012124387 October 3, 2000 25 7.J. Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Emergency Set Aside Funding - After -the -Fact Authorization to Execute Notice of jntent to Apply John's River Water Management District - Wabasso Area Water Wells) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 26, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: Roberf M. Keating, AI P; Co ty Development DirectorTHROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief' S .ong-Range Planning �( FROM: Peter J. Radke; Economic Development Planner DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AFTER -THE -FACT AUTHORIZATION FOR THE VICE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPLY FOR SMALL CITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) EMERGENCY SET- ASIDE FUNDING It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 3, 2000. Recently, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) announced funding availability for fiscal year 2000, under the Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Emergency Set -Aside Program, to aid individuals who have had potable water wells that have stopped functioning effectively as a result of the 2000 drought. DCA has allocated $1,277,279 for this emergency assistance related to drought relief. Funds under this emergency set-aside program are limited to assisting eligible city and county governments where there is an urgent and immediate threat to the health and welfare of the community due to drought conditions. This program is targeted to low and moderate income families who receive water from public or private wells that have stopped functioning as a result of the year 2000 drought for which no other federal, state, or local funds are available to address the need. To receive the application for the CDBG Emergency Set -Aside Program, the county is required to complete the- "Notice of Intent to Apply for Small Cities CDBG Emergency Set -Aside Funding" form and submit the form to DCA by September 25, 2000 at 5:00 PM. Since staff was notified of the funding availability less than a week before the deadline, staff was unable to present the Notice October 3, 2000 - 26 BK 1 15 PG 264 of Intent form to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration prior to submitting the form to DCA. Consquently, staff had the form signed by Vice Chairman Ginn with the understanding that the item would be brought before the Board of Commissioners for after -the -fact consideration. Attachment one to this staff report is the completed Notice of Intent form, which was submitted to DCA prior to the 5:00 PM deadline on September 25`x. The next step in the process will be to identify those individuals that have been affected by the 2000 drought conditions. If staff are able to identify affected individuals, then staff will complete the CDBG application and submit that application to DCA by the November 8, 2000 deadline. To receive funding through the emergency set-aside program, the following thresholds must be met: ► water well problems must be a direct result of the drought; and ► activities must benefit low and moderate income families. Within Indian River County, the Wabasso area may meet the identified thresholds. While the county has not documented water well problems due to the 2000 drought, staff has documented that the area is dominated by low and moderate income households that rely solely on private wells for their water needs. In the past two years, Indian River County has submitted two neighborhood revitalization CDBG applications for the Wabasso area that did not score high enough to receive funding. Both applications proposed potable water projects that would have extended the county's potable water system into four Wabasso neighborhoods. In 1999, the county's CDBG application ranked 49`h out of 49 neighborhood revitalization applications submitted. That application scored 129 points below the fundable range. Similarly, the 2000 application finished 144 points below the fundable range, and was ranked 40`h out of 41 applications submitted. While county staff have not documented any problems with water wells in the Wabasso area, the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) did perform an inspection of the water wells in the Wabasso area due to property owner complaints from previous years. Attachment two of this staff report summaries SJRWMD staff findings from those inspections. RECOMMF._ _ ATiON Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant after -the -fact authorization for the Vice Chairman to sign a Notice of Intent to Apply for Small Cities CDBG Emergency Set -Aside Funding. ATTACHMENTS 1.) Notice of Intent to Apply for Small Cities CDBG Emergency Set -Aside Funding 2.) Letter from the St. Johns River Water Management District October 3, 2000 27 BK 115 PG 265 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved after -the -fact authorization for the Vice Chairman to execute a Notice of Intent to Apply for Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Emergency Set -Aside Funding, as recommended in the Memorandum. DOCUAflMS WILL BE PLACE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TAE CLERK TO THE BOARD WREN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED ZX Economic Development Communiiv Development Block Grant - (CDBG,- Approval of Consultant Selection Committee's Ranking - Negotiations with Berryman and Henniger Authorized The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 26, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Keating, AI§F Comvewlity Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning S -W, FROM: Peter J. Radke; Economic Development Planner DATE: September 26, 2000 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 3, 2000. On May 9, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners, at an advertised public hearing, directed staff to pursue possible economic development CDBG projects with existing local businesses that are October 3, 2000 - 28 BK 115 PG 266 planning to expand or with new businesses considering relocation to the county. Since that public hearing, staff has coordinated with several existing local businesses that are planning to expand their operations and create new jobs that will meet the guidelines of the CDBG program. At that May 9, 2000 meeting, the Board also authorized staff to initiate the process to select a consultant to prepare a CDBG application and administer the grant, if awarded. While a specific project has not yet been finalized for a CDBG application, retaining a consultant now to prepare the application and administer the grant will streamline the CDBG process once a specific project is identified. ANALIS Based on the Board of County Commissioners' actions at its May 9, 2000 meeting, county staff prepared a Request for Proposals (RFP) to hire a consultant to prepare the CDBG application and administer the grant. Five proposals were received by the county for review. A consultant selection committee, consisting of Michael Hotchkiss, Environmental Engineer, Peter Radke, Economic Development Planner, and Robert M. Keating, Community Development Director, reviewed the five proposals submitted by grant writing consultant firms. Based on each firm's written proposal, the consultant selection committee ranked the five consulting fines separately for each service being requested (application preparation services and grant administration services) by the county. The five consulting firms were ranked as follows: Final Ranking Application Preparation Services Administration Services Berryman and Henniger Berryman and Henniger CRA Consulting, Inc. CRA Consulting, Inc. Fred Fox Enterprises, Inc. Fred Fox Enterprises, Inc. Summitt Professional Service Summit Professional Service Nancy Phillips & Associates Nancy Phillips & Associates As indicated in its proposal, Bergman and Henniger will prepare the application at no charge to the county. If the application receives funding, Berryman and Henniger will get 7.5% of the grant funds for administering the project. If the project does not get funded, there will be no cost to the county for the consultant having prepared the application. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the consultant selection prioritization list and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the number one ranked firm. October 3, 2000 29 BK 1 15 PG 267 I ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the consultant selection committee's prioritized list and authorized staff to begin contract negotiations with the number one ranked firm, Berryman and Henniger, as recommended in the Memorandum. 7.L. Apj2ointment ofNorth Barrier Island Corridor Plan Task Force Members The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 27, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D ON HEAD CONCURRENCE: i obert M. Keating, AICP Community Development irecto 10 FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: September 27, 2000 SUBJECT: Appointment of North Barrier Island Corridor Plan Task Force It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 3, 2000. BACKGROUND: At its July 18, 2000 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners adopted special corridor plan requirements for the portion of the Wabasso Corridor Plan area that lies east of US #1 along CR 510, and directed staff to initiate establishment and appointment of members for a North Barrier Island Corridor Plan Task Force (see attachment #1). The purpose of such a task force is to formulate and help implement a corridor plan, based upon the Wabasso and CR 510 East Corridor Plan requirements, for the north barrier island area that runs along CR 510, and SR A -1-A north of the Town of Indian River Shores. Any proposed plan would require Board review and approval before becoming effective. October 3, 2000 - 30 BK 1 15 PG 268 _I The Board is now to approve appointment of a slate of members to serve on the task force. Once members are appointed, staff will convene the task force to initiate its corridor planning duties. ANALYSIS: The CR 510 East Corridor requirements adopted in July were the result of work from the Wabasso Corridor Plan Task Force and the 7 member ad hoc group known as the CR 510 Ea -t Corridor Committee, which is chaired by Bill Glynn and consists of north barrier island residents from various neighborhoods. In essence, creation of the North Barrier Island Task Force is the next step in a corridor plan process begun by the CR 510 East Committee. Thus, it is logical for the Board to appoint the Committee members to the Task Force. In addition to the original Committee members, representation on the Task Force could be expanded to include other north barrier island residents, a member of the Wabasso Task Force, and a representative from the Disney Resort. To that end, the slate of recommended members is as follows: Bill Glynn (President of the North Beach Civic Association, Summerplace Resident) Bob Bruce (Vice -President of the North Beach Civic Association, North A -1-A Resident) Ray Hilton (President of Sea Oaks Property Owners' Association) Bill Johnson (Director of the Civic Association of Indian River County, Sea Oaks Resident) Rodney Williams (Architect, Summerplace resident) James Doyle (Vice President of Summerplace Improvement Association) Ernest Polverari (Town Manager, Town of Orchid) Elizabeth Sorenson (President of the North Beach Garden Club, Island Club Resident) Janyne Kenworthy (Summerplace Resident) Ruth Meyers (Member of the Wabasso Corridor Task Force, Summerplace Resident) Renee Brock (Manager Disney Resort) Attached is correspondence relating to these potential appointments (see attachment #2). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners appoint the referenced slate of names as members of the North Barrier Island Task Force. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Excerpt from Board of County Commissioners Minutes (July 18, 2000) 2. Correspondence on Appointees _ October 3, 2000 31 BK 1 15 PG 269 I I ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) appointed the slate of names, as set out in the above memorandum, as members of the North Barrier Island Corridor Plan Task Force, as recommended in the Memorandum. Z.H. Environmental Lands - Oyster Bar Salt Marsh, Oslo Riverfront South, North Sebastian C.A. Addition, Wabasso Scrub C.A. Addition LAAC Sites - Florida Communities Trust Cost -Share - Agreement Extensions/Addenda The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 12, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DE ME TNT HEAD CONC NCE: Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Di ector � FROM: Roland M. DeBloir,- CP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: September 12, 2000 RE: Board Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost -Share Agreement Extensions/ Addenda for: Oyster Bar Salt Marsh; Oslo Riverfront South; North Sebastian C.A. Addition; and Wabasso Scrub C.A. Addition LAAC Sites It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 3, 2000. Attached, for the Bard's approval consideration, are Addenda to Conceptual Approval Agreements relating to the following Florida Communities Trust (FCT) environmental land acquisition cost -share projects: Oyster Bar Salt Marsh; Oslo Riverfront South; North Sebastian C.A. Addition; and the Wabasso Scrub C.A. October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 270 32 Addition. The proposed addenda, already approved by the FCT, will extend the grant project deadlines six months beyond the current grant expiration dates. In addition to extending the expiration dates of the referenced FCT grants, the attached addenda amend the original Conceptual Approval Agreements for each project by adding a section on audit requirements, per the Florida Single Audit Act (Sec. 215.97, Florida Statutes). The Florida Single Audit Act provides uniform state audit requirements for state financial assistance provided by state agencies over an audit threshold of $300,000. Since the FCT is a state agency, the FCT has expanded its documents to include reference to Audit Act requirements. According to the County Budget Manager, county staff is fully aware of Florida Single Audit Act requirements, and the County complies with Audit Act requirements under its regular auditing procedures. As such, the additional language in the attached addenda will not result in additional work or county responsibility, per se, but only expands the FCT agreements to bring attention to state audit requirements already in play. Ovster Bar Salt Marsh The Oyster Bar Salt Marsh "Addendum 3 to Conceptual Approval Agreement" will extend the FCT grant until January 27,200 1, to allow finalization of the project purchase. The County's land acquisition consultant (FloridAffinity, Inc.) has made progress with negotiations based on FCT approved appraisals. Option contracts with two of the key landowners within the project are close to being finalized. A six month extension will allow negotiations to continue for this multiple ownership project. Oslo Riverfront South The Oslo Riverfront South "Addendum 1 to Conceptual Approval Agreement" will extend the FCT grant until February 28, 2001. Indian River County, in coordination with the FCT, has closed on two of the three ownerships in the project. The remaining "Diamond parcel" is currently under negotiation. This extension will allow for continuing negotiations relating to the Diamond parcel. North Sebastian C.A. Addition The North Sebastian Conservation Area Addition "Addendum 2 to Conceptual Approval Agreement" will extend the FCT grant until February 28, 2001. The County purchased the subject property in March 1999, and is seeking cost -share reimbursement under the FCT grant. Appraisals and other acquisition documents have been reviewed and accepted by FCT staff. What remains is for the County to revise the current - - management plan for the North Sebastian Conservation Area to include the addition. An extension to the CAA is requested to allow finalization of management plan revisions in conjunction with County submittal of a project plan. Wabasso Scrub C.A. Addition The Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area Addition "Addendum 2 to Conceptual Approval Agreement" will extend the FCT grant until February 28, 2001. County staff is currently negotiating a purchase contract for this one -ownership addition to the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area, and is hopeful that a contract will be forthcoming in the next few months. The grant extension will allow staff to finalize a purchase contract and project plan. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute the attached agreement addenda for the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh; Oslo Riverfront South; North Sebastian C.A. Addition; and Wabasso Scrub C.A. Addition LAAC projects. October 3, 2000 33 6KiI5PG271 I r 1. "Addendum 3 to the Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh project. 2. "Addendum 1 to Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Oslo Riverfront South project. 3. "Addendum 2 to Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the North Sebastian CA Addition project. 4. "Addendum 2 to Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Wabasso Scrub CA Addition project. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement addenda for the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh (to 1/27/2001), Oslo Riverfront South (to 2/28/2001), North Sebastian Conservation Area Addition (to 2/28/2001), and Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area Addition (to 2/28/2001) LAAC projects, as recommended in the Memorandum. PARTIALLY EXECUTED ADDENDA TO CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN TBE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.N. Bid #3003 - Annual Bid for Corrugated Steel Pine Awarded to Metal Culverts, Ina (Public Works/Road & Bridge Division) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 20, 2000: DATE: September 20, 2000 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator Thomas Frame, General Services Director FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager JX01C. �iGGz� SUBJECT: Bid Award: IRC #3003 Annual Bid for Corrugated Steel Pipe Public Works Department/Road and Bridge Division October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 272 34 0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Bid Opening Date: August 30, 2000 at 2:00 P.M. Advertising Dates: August 16 & 23, 2000 Notices Sent to: Five (5) Vendors Replies: Two (2) Vendor October 3, 2000 35 BUIRI 115 PG 273 0 n,:.,,.... . . . . . . .. ...... ... ....... 1 120 x 16 gauge 400 ft 54.31 $4.82 $4.54 2 12* Mitered Cut 10 ea $12.00 $12.00 $18.00 3 12" Band and Gasket Set, I ft long I ea $11.52 $12.90 $11.35 4 12" Band and Gasket Set 2 ft long I ea $23.93 $26.80 $15.89 5 15" x 16 gauge 400 ft $5.38 56.02 $5.71 6 15" Mitered Cut 10 ea $15.00 $15.00 $22.50 7 15" Band and Gasket Set, I ft long I set $14.21 515.91 514.28 8 15" Band and Gasket Set 2 ft long I Set $22.97 $25.72 $19.99 9 180 x 16 gauge 400 ft 56.40 $7.16 $6.78 10 18" Mitered Cut 10 ea $18.00 $19.00 $27.00 ii ig" Band and Gasket Set I ft long - I set $16.91 $18.82 $16.95 12 18* Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $35.26 $39.49 $23.73 13 24" x 16 gauge7 400 ft $8.49 $9.50 $9.08 14 24" Mitered Cut 10 ea $24.00 $24.00 $36.001 15 24" Band and Gasket SM I It long 1 set $22.72 $25." $22.70 16 24" Band and Gasket Set 2 ft long I set $36.59 $40.98 $31.78 17 30" x 14 gauge 200 ft 512.60 $14.11 $13.75 18 30" Mitered Cut 6 ea No Bid No Bid 19 30" Band and Gasket Set, I ft long 1 set $31.05 $34.77 $34.38 20 30" Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $50.35 $56.39 $48.13 21 360 x 14 gauge 100 ft $15.05 $16.95 $16.40 22 36" Mitered Cut 4 ea $36.00 $36.00 $54.00 23 36" Band and Gasket Set, I ft long I set $37.51 $42.01 $41.00 24 36" Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set 1 $60.58 $67.84 $57.40 25 42" x 12 gauge 40 ft $24.24 $27.14 $26.41 26 42" Mitered Cut I ea $42.00 $42.00 $63.00 27 420 Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $87.04 $97.48 $92.45 28 48" x 12 gauge 40 ft $27.67 $30.99 $30.09 October 3, 2000 35 BUIRI 115 PG 273 0 F, October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 274 36 'I . .. . . . ....... . ... I ......... .... 29 148" Nfitered Cut I ea $48.00 $48.00 $72.00 30 48" Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $99.72 $111.68 $105.32 31 54" x 12 gauge 40 ft $31.09 $34.82 $34.30 32 54- Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $111.76 $125.17 $120.05 33 60" x 10 gauge 40 ft $42.65 $47.76 $47.28 34 60" Band and Gasket Set. 2 ft long I set $144.14 $161.43 $165.48 35 66" x 10 gauge 30 ft $46.88 $52.50 $51.94 36 66* Band and Gasket Set. 2 ft long I set $158.20 $177.18 $181.44 37 72" x 10 gauge 20 ft $51.13 $57.26 $56.45 38 72" Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $172.93 $193.68 $197.58 39 84" x 8 gauge 20 ft $71.94 $90.57 $90.74 40 94- Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $131.95 $282.00 $317.59 41 IT X IT, 16 gauge 400 ft $6.10 $6.83 $6.06 42 17" x 13" Mitered Cut 10 ea $15.00 $15.00 $22.50 43 17" x 13" Band & Gasket Set I ft long I set $12.24 $13.70 $15.15 44 17* x 13" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I I set $24.77 $27.74 $21.21 45 1 21" x 15" 16 gauge 4001 ft 1 $7.261 $8.131 $7.12 46 21" x 15" Mtered Cut 10 ea SI8.00 $18.00 $27.00 47 21" x 15" Band & Gasket Set, 1 ft long I set $18.10 $20.27 $17.80 48 21' x 15" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $29.40 $32.92 $24.92 49 28" x 20" 14 gauge 400 ft No Bid No Bid 50 28* x 20* Mitered Cut 10 ea $24.00 $24.00 $36.00 51 28" x 20" Band & Gasket Set, I ft long I set $25.20 $28.22 $23.90 52 29" x 20" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $40.72 $45.60 $33.48 53 35" x24", 14 gauge 200 ft $14.39 $16.11 $14.32 54 35" x 24" Mitered Cut 6 ea $30.00 $30.00 $45.00 55 35" x 24" Band & Gasket Set, I ft long I set $33.73 $37.77 $35.80 56 35" x 24" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $54.82 $61.39 $50.12 57 42" x 29"q 14 gauge 100 ft $17.20 $19.26 $16.98 58 42" x 29* Mitered Cut 4 ea $36.00 $36.00 $54.00 59 42" x 29' Band & Gasket Set I ft long I Ca $40.74 $45.62 $42.45 60 42* x 29" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $65.96 $73.87 $59.43 61 49" x 33", 12 gauge 40 ft 527.90 $31.13 $27.10 62 49" x 33*, Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $95.94 $107.45 $94.85 October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 274 36 'I 0 October 3, 2000 37 BK 115 PG 275 0 .......... ... . ..... 18 40 ft - - - - - - - - - - SRI $31.73 $35.53 $30.83 63 15r x 38' 12 Gauge 64 57" x 38" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set 5109.87 $123.05 $107.90 65 64" x 43" 12 gauge 40 ft 1 $35.66 $39.93 $35.22 66 64* x 43" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set 5123.19 $137.97 $123.27 fl SECTION 11 ALUMINUM PIPE $13.70 $12.32 80 24" Mitered Cut 67 12" x 16 gauge 400 ft $5.09 $5.70 $5.12 68 12" Mitered Cut 10 ea S12.00 $12.00 $18.00 69 12* Band and Gasket Set, I ft long I set $12.69 $14.21 $12.9 70 120 Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $7.78 $19.95 $17.92 71 15" x 16 gauge 400 ft $6.21 $6.95 $6.24 72 15" Mitered Cut 10 ea $15.00 $15.00 522.50 73 15" Band & Gasket Set, I ft long I set s15.45 $17.30 $15.60 74 15" Band & Gasket Set 2 ft long $57.02 $63.86 525.04 $28.04 $21.84 75- 18* x 16 gauge 400 ft $7.48 $8.37 $7.52 October 3, 2000 37 BK 115 PG 275 0 .......... ... . ..... 18 ........... - 10 ...... .. ... . I . I .. I . ea III....... II I ...... I II I ....... ................... . ... .. $18.00 $ 18.0wo $27.00 76 77 18' Band & Gasket Set. I ft long T set No Bid No Bid 78 18" Band & Gasket Set. 2 ft long 1 set $29.96 $33.55 $26.32 79 24" x 14 Gauge 400 fl S12.24 $13.70 $12.32 80 24" Mitered Cut 10 es $24.001 $24.00 $36.00 81 24" Band & Gasket Set. I ft long I set $28.35 $31.75 530.80 82 24" Band & Gasket Set. 2 ft long I set $45.97 $51.48 S43.12- 83 30" x 14 gauge 2001 ft $15.27 $17,10 $15.36 94 30" Mitered Cut 6 ea $30.00 530.00 $45.00 85 30" Band & Gasket Set, I ft long I set $35.05 $39.25 $38.40 86 30" Band & Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $57.02 $63.86 $53.76 87 36" x 14" gauge 100 ft $18.29 $20.48 $18.40 88 36" Mitered Cut 4 ea $36.00 $36.00 $54.00 99 36" Band & Gasket Set, I ft long I set $42.37 $47.45 $46.00 90 36" Band & Gasket Set. 2 ft long I set $68.68 $76.92 $64.4-01 91 42" x 12 gauge 40 ft $29.58 $33.12 $29.76 92 42" Mitered Cut I ea $42.00 1 $42.00 $63.00 October 3, 2000 37 BK 115 PG 275 0 r- LAST YEAR EXPENDITURE $43,196.34 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following: • Award the bid to the low bidder, Metal Culverts Inc. , as the overall low bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. • Establish an Open End Contract with Metal Culverts Ing.with a not to exceed amount of $75,000.00 for the period October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001. • Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County. October 3, 2000 - BK 115 PG 27 & 38 'I S1S =ON IL =ON . .. .. ...... "."I 'long 42" Band and Gasket Set. 2 ft I set 1 SI00.39 $112.43 $104.16 94 48" x 12 gauge 40 ft $33.71 $37.75 $33.92 95 48" Mitered Cut 1 ea $48.00 $48.00 $72.00 96 48" Band and Gasket Set, 2 K long I set $114.82 $128.59 $118.72 97 54* x 12 gauge 40 ft $37.84 $42.38 $38.08 98 54" Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $128.64 $144.07 $133.28 99 60" x 10 gauge 40 ft $53.90 $60.36 $54.24 100 60" Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I set $172.27 $192.24 $189.84 101 66" x 10 gauge 30 1 ft $59.151 $66.24 $59.521 102 66" Band and Gasket Set, 2 ft long I I set I $188.871 $211.53 $208.321 103 72" x 10 gauge 201 ft I $64.391 $72.11 $64.80 104 72" Band & Gasket Set 2 R long I set I $206.08 1 $230.80 $226.80 TOTAL I i6-9,200.21 $77,269.081 $73,632.65,11 LAST YEAR EXPENDITURE $43,196.34 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following: • Award the bid to the low bidder, Metal Culverts Inc. , as the overall low bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. • Establish an Open End Contract with Metal Culverts Ing.with a not to exceed amount of $75,000.00 for the period October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001. • Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County. October 3, 2000 - BK 115 PG 27 & 38 'I ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0 Vice ('hairman Ginn absent) awarded Bid #3003 for Corrugated Steel Pipe to Metal Culverts, Inc., established an Open End Contract with Metal Culverts, Inc. with a not -to -exceed amount of $75,000 for FY 2000-01, and authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional one-year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County, as recommended in the Memorandum. BID DOCUMENTS AND CONTRACT WILL BE PLACID ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD WBEN RECEIVED 7.0. Bid #3002 -Annual Bidfob forced Concrete Pipe -Awarded to CSR Hvdro Conduit ofFlorida. InG (Public Works/Road & Bridge Division The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 20, 2000: DATE: September 20, 2000 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator 11 Thomas Frame, General Services Director FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing ManageJ,,�w SUBJECT: Bid Award: IRC #3002 Annual Bid for Reinforced Concrete Pipe Public Works DepartmenvRoad and Bridge Division October 3, 2000 we, BK 115 PG 277 • BACKGROUND INFORMATION Bid Opening Date: August 30, 2000 at 2:00 P.M. Advertising Dates: August 16 & 23, 2000 Notices Sent to: Seven (7) Vendors Joelson Concrete Pipe Co. Venice, Fl Lemsco, Riviera Beach, Fl Southern Culvert, Pinellas Park, Fl Wheeler Consolidated, Ft Pierce, Fl Consolidated Prestressed Concrete, Leesburg, Fl Lowry's Culvert, Port St Lucie, F1 Tri County Concrete Products, West Palm Beach, F1 Replies: One (1) Vendor Sole Bid Received for Rf.&--a r.-.- Dt 1 15" X 8 FT RCP 10 EA $57.20 $56.80 2 15" Mitered End Section 2 EA $73.20 $72.80 3 18" x L�Fr RCP 10 EA $71.20 S68.48 4 18* Mitered End Section $102.40 2 EA $87.20 $84.48 5 24* x I 8 F RCP 10 EA $112.80 $100.00, 6 24- Mitered Section 2 2 EA $128.80 $124.00 7 30" x 1 8 Fr -RCP 10 EA $164.40 $140.40 8 30" Mitered End Section 38- 2 EA $360.80 $328.80 9 36* ----F8 x -- -FT RCP 10 EA $226.00 $198.24 10 36- Mft7-.d EndSection2 29* - Mitered End Section EA S484.00! S460A8 11 42- x I 8 F RCP 10 EA $288.80 $253.60 12 48" x -F8 -FT RCP 10 EA $357.20 $304.4013 RCP 54- x --T _8FT RCP 10 EA $433.20 $363.60 14 15 54" 60- Mitered End Section x 8 FT RCP 2 10 EA 'EA $1,347.60 $516.80 $1.210.80 $445.20 16 66- x 8 FT RCP 10 EA $608.00 $542.40 17 72- x 8 Fr RCP 10 "EA $712.40 $606.6-0 18 84- -3? 8 Fr RCP 10 EA $1,472.00 No Bid 19 96- x 8 FT RCP 10 $40.00- $1,680.00 No Bid 20 12* - x 18" RCP 10 JEA JEA I $67.201 $69.361 Sole Bid Received for Reinforced r...t. Pi - 21 12" Mitered End Section ir 2 EA $83.20 $85.36 22 14* x - 23- RCP 10 EA $86.40 $90.56 23 14" Mitered �Section 23" 2 EA $102.40 $106.56' 24 19" x -Mitered 30" RCP 10 EA 5134.40 $124.00 25 19" End Section 30- 2 EA $150.40 $148.00 26 24- x -Xt-mr-d 38* RCP 10 EA $185.60 $166.40 27 24- End Section 38- F- 2 EA S20-1.60 $190.40 28 297-- 'x 45' RCP 10 EA $265.20 $236.40 29 29* - Mitered End Section 45" 2 EA $562.40 $536.80 30 34' x 53" RCP 1 10 EA $348.80 $312.40 31 38" x 60- RCP 10 EA $430,40 $384,40 32 43" x 68- RCP 10 E-A $537.20 $480.80 Add U. - x I 8 FT RCP Sub Total 10 EA $63,195.20 $1,472.00 S53-mzso No Bid Add 96- x 8 Fr RCP 10 EA' $1,680.00 No Bid GRAM TOTAL I I $94,715.20 33 Extra Lube (5 gal 1 10 ILB I $40.00- $.75 per IbI LAST YEAR EXPENDITURE $49,234.15 October 3, 2000 - 40 BK 115 PG 278 I • • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following: • Award the bid to the sole bidder, CSR Hydro Conduit of Florida Inc., as the overall low bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid • Establish an Open End Contract with CSR Hydro Conduit of Florida Inc.with a not to exceed amount of $60,000 for the period October 1, 2000 through September 30, 2001. • Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional -one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance atld the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Grin absent) awarded Bid #3002 to the sole bidder, CSR Hydro Conduit of Florida, Inc., established an Open End Contract with CSR Hydro Conduit of Florida, Inc. with a not -to - exceed amount of $60,000 for FY 2000-01, and authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two additional one-year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County, as recommended in the Memorandum. BID DOCUMaUS AND CONTRACT wILL BE PLACID ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD - - - wBEN RECEIVED 7.P. Bid #3011- Annual Bid for Janitorial Supplies - Purchasing Warehouse - Awarded to Janitorial Depot o America, Inc The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 15, 2000: October 3, 2000 41 BK 115 PG 279 DATE: September 15, 2000 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator Thomas Frame, Director of General Services �I,tiisrd tc� • FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager J,,C� SUBJECT: Bid Award IRC#3011/ Annual Bid for Janitorial Supplies Purchasing Warehouse BACKGROUND: Bid Opening Date: September 6, 2000 at 2:00 P.M. Advertising Dates: August 22 & 28, 2000 Notices Faxed to: Ninety five (95)Vendors Replies: Sixteen (16) Vendors VENDOR SEE ATTACHED BID TABULATION SHEET FOR THE FOLLOWING LISTED VENDORS Airwick Professional Vero Chemical All American Poly Zip Zap Supply Products, Vero Beach, Fl Piscataway, NJ Company Longwood, F1 Altamonte Springs, F1 Coldplast Corporation Central Poly Janitorial Depot of Jerry's Vacuum and Marietta, Ga Corporation America, Inc. Janitorial Supplies, Linden, NJ Melbourne, Fl Leesburg,Florida Zep Manufacturing Medwaste Solutions Songahi Inc Office Depot Orlando, F1 Palm Beach Gardens, North Miami, Fl Orlando, Fl F1 Southern Janitor Supply Dade Paper -St. Lucie Paper, Enviromental Inc Riviera Beach, Fl Ft. Pierce, Fl Management Melbourne, Fl Supplies II, Inc. Bonita Springs, Fl RECOMMENDATION • Staff recommends that the bid be awarded as the overall low bidder to Janitorial Depot of America, Inc as most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. • Establish an Open End Contract with Janitorial Depot ofAmerica. Inc for a twelve month period from the date of award with a not to exceed amount of $50,000. • Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance, and the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the County. October 3, 2000 - BK 115 PG 280 0 42 0 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) awarded Bid #3011 to Janitorial Depot of America, Inc., to provide janitorial supplies, established an Open End Contract with Janitorial Depot of America, Inc. for a 12 -month period from the date of award with a not -to -exceed amount of $50,000, and authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two additional one-year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance, and the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the County, as recommended in the Memorandum. BID DOCUM©US AND CONTRACT WILL BE PLACID ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN RECEIVED 7. . Tourism Stud v -.Indian River Coun& Chamber of Commerce - Funding Authorization The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 27, 2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator DATE: September 27, 2000 SUBJECT: Tourism Study in the Amount of $58,841 From Tourist Development Funds FROM: Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator October 3, 2000 43 BK 1 15 PG 28 1 • At the May 2, 2000 Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Board authorized the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce to solicit proposals for the Tourism Study. The reason for the decision was that Indian River County had solicited proposals and the lowest bid was $89,000, and Indian River County had budgeted only $50,000. It was felt that proposals sent out from a private sector (such as the Chamber) might produce more aggressive bids. The Chamber has reached an agreement to have the University of Florida do the tourism study for $58,841. Staff feels we may want to allow approval of a 10% contingency of $5,900, to be authorized by the Assistant County Administrator, in case additions need to be made. They then can be facilitated expediently. Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chamber of Commerce to enter into a contract with University of Florida in the amount of $58,841, plus a $5,900 contingency, for a tourism study, to be reimbursed from Tourist Development funds. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) authorized the Chamber of Commerce to enter into a contract for a tourism study with University of Florida in the amount of $58,841, plus a $5,900 contingency, to be reimbursed from Tourist Development funds, as recommended in the Memorandum. 7.R. State of Florida Department ofHealth Contract - 2000/2001 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 21, 2000: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 21, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000/2001 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CONTRACT October 3, 2000 - 44 BK I I5 PG 282 THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrat FROM: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager C�v The Indian River County Health Department has submitted their annual contract for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The contract, required under Florida Statute 154, contains the full annual operating budget, revenues and expenditure program plan for the Health Department, along with proposed fee schedules for 2000/2001. REC'OMWNDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve this contract. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED aY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice I Chairman Ginn absent) approved the contract with the State of Florida Department of Health for the operation of the Indian River County Health Department for contract year 2000-2001, as recommended in the Memorandum.. CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.S. Resolution No. 2000-118 - Traffic Control Device Ledger The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 25, 2000: October 3, 2000 45 BK 1 15 PG 2 8 3 TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Dire FROM: Christopher R. Mora, P.E. 0V1— County Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Control Device Ledger DATE: September 25, 2000 CONSENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Public Works Director is to provide a Traffic Control Device Ledger update, every six months, for ratification by the Board of County Commissioners as specified by Section 312.18 of Indian River County Code. RECOMMENDATIONS & FUNDING It is recommended that this ledger update be approved. There is no funding impact generated by this action. ATTACHMENT Draft Resolution and Ledger Documents 0. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution No. 2000-118 approving traffic control devices authorized by the Director of Public Works. October 3, 2000 BK 1 15 PG 284 46 t I RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 118 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AUTHORIZED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has directed the Director of Public Works to maintain a ledger listing the traffic control devices in the unincorporated area of the County (Section 312.18, Indian River County Code); and WHEREAS, the code requires this ledger to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval; and WHEREAS, the ledger has been presented and is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: The Board of County Commissioners hereby accepts and approves the traffic control device ledger which is Exhibit "A" to this resolution. The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner Tiepin and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Absent Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye October 3, 2000 47 BK 1 15 PG 285 Resolution No. 2000 - 118 The7 Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3 r d day of October . 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS Atte . K. Barton, C INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ByCL.�- Deputy Clerk Fran B. Adams Chairman EXHIBIT "A" IS ON FILE WITH THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7. T. Driver vs. Indian River County - Order to Mediate - Appointment ofCommuni, DevelopmentDirectorRobertKeatingas County's Negotiator The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 18, 2000: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: William G. Collins II — Deputy CoLnty Attorney DATE: September 18, 2000 SUBJECT: Driver vs Indian River County, Order to Mediate The presiding judge in the above -styled case has ordered the parties to mediation. Under mediation rules, the Board should appoint a representative with full authority to negotiate on behalf of the Board and to recommend settlement to the Board. Since the matters at issue in this case involve setbacks, building permits, fence permits, etc., I feel the appropriate representative would be Community Development Director Robert Keating. At present, mediation is scheduled for October 10th. RECOMMENDATION: r_ Appoint Robert Keating as the representative of the Board of County Commissioners with full authority to negotiate on behalf of the Board and to recommend settlement possibilities to the Board. October 3, 2000 - X 48 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) appointed Robert Keating as the representative of the Board of County Commissioners with full authority to negotiate on behalf of the Board and to recommend Settlement possibilities to the Board, as recommended in the Memorandum. 7. U. Resolution No. 2000-119 - Cancelling Taxes on Acauired Property - R/WDedication for Barber Street Re -alignment - Nelson C. Hyatt and Marie Dolores Hyatt (City of Sebastian The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 25, 2000: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM4 William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney DATE: September 25, 2000 SUBJECT: Resolution Cancelling Taxes on Acquired Property A Resolution has been prepared for the purpose of cancelling any delinquent or current taxes which may exist on the following property acquired by the City of Sebastian for the re -alignment of Barber Street Right-of-way acquired from Nelson C. Hyatt and Marie Dolores Hyatt, his wife, which property is fully described in that Warranty Deed recorded in Official Record Book 1337, Pages 0788-0791, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute the Resolution cancelling certain taxes upon publicly owned lands, and the Clerk to send a certified copy of same to the Tax Collector so that any delinquent or current taxes can be cancelled. October 3, 2000 BK 1 15 PG 287 ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution No. 2000-119 cancelling certain taxes upon publicly owned lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Right -of -Way Dedication for Barber Street re -alignment from Hyatt to City of Sebastian) RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 1 1 9 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the zounty and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed October 3, 2000 50 RESOLUTION NO. 2000. 119 to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of section 196.28, F.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Any and all liens for taxes delinquent or current against the following described lands, which were dedicated for right-of-way from Nelson C. Hyatt and Marie Dolores Hyatt, his wife to the City of Sebastian are hereby cancelled pursuant to the authority of section 196.28, F.S. See attached Warranty Deed describing lands, recorded In O.R. Book 1337 at Pages 0788, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner T i 0 p i n , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d eand, upon being put to - — a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Absent Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin A y e October 3, 2000 51 F, 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-119 The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 31d day of 0 t n b r , 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By�/� Q-" '6 (Q�Gf Fran B. Adams, Chairman ATT Jeffrey K. B lerk B ^ Deputy Clerk October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 290 52 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY L`J� e< rw C- WILLIAhq G. COLLINS I! DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY This document was prepareed by om"Immy sum cac'_ s orid by re!=—n-d to = 3 B 5tG •'S o t:,e Cc-. -.y Atiorn_y's Office, ��; . • — r _��F��::` -T~-_ 134v such 5t., Va_o Beach, y L , Florida $2960 IEFI•RE1' K Rlat4Mf. CLERK 0_ ; ; L: R ; INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Ir.:hAN AivEh CO.. Fu.. THIS INDENTURE, made this day of l77A , Y 2000 between NELSON C. HYATT and MARIE DOLORES HYATT, his wife, whose mailing address is 8725 Lakeside Boulevard, #311, Vero Beach, Florida 32963, hereinafter called GRANTOR, and CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a municipal corporation, whose mailing address is 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida 32958, hereinafter called GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN Cn DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in o hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has rn granted, bargained and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Indian River County, Florida: See Exhibit "A" attached -hereto and made a part hereof. GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will 0 c defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. C_ Signed, sealed and delivered z in the presence of: printed name: Ja Nelson C. att co printed name• o1Cei9-Lcz— Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: A) R A, ! /1!R s flrt- printed name: s //,, ,?,C 7J���uQi W Marie Dolores Hyatt o printed name: , Co Co October 3, 2000 53 DU I 15 PG 29 1 I STATE OF N e COUNTY OF OKi� The regoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of bl ff' , 2000, by Nelson C. Hyatt, who is either personally known to me or has produced as identification. STATE OF /✓G COUNTY OF NOTARY PUBLIC print Commission No.: Commission Expiration: ,3 /%03 Th foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,;29' day of jz, 2000, by Marie Dolores Hyatt, who is either personally known to me or has produced 1nA,1flS L.�cySu as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC w X03 y . ,y printed e: *?i Commissi n No.: Commission Expiration: e-. October 3, 2000 - 54 BK 1 15 PG 292 • IMAM RnON Te.Arn�pn@efig3ned ot. of on Et) -foot right -of- Into a* BOrbol Corrarnerr'l of e% � 139 Comer or r do -Abed es t t mp t' � �► in Seetlonf 20 and 21. 11 S 2S`S 1. N W13'40* W. Then N" t he 1�4 Section lino. a mow of i 1�7 to a4d311 pg&a in�Noe concrete WIW40"on W Bi+a of � ' E. 0" the west ht -or- Hght-of reofignOd portion of Berber Sb -ML Then rru ' a uSstonce of 303.10 feet to the P01NT OF BEt.'i1�pprdC of the S fir02'tti' W. a" the North rare of the eaoGgrnrrnent. a disternce et ort roCkm Curve Coneove to UM North eqL Then n++ 403.24 tae! to a point of ewve 0 450-frt anstb q Bores St cognmenL TThen �2T00'33 : an me dnstonce of 216.84 feat to o point of tong,,,, with S 1'02'49' W a dktonee of 80.00 feet to the point of peva of o 9,0 -foot nodi a Darya. Cone�e to the gest Then run �Na�the Carve. through o Control ongie of 27W*33', an ore distenC& of 25436 het to a point of to V"Y. N 64'02'16' E o distance of 403.24 root to a point in tM West right -of -m" gft of U& N 2Ssi44' W. oiong the West right -of -nay, o distonce of 80.00 feat to the POINT OF BEMN WNW 1. Then run Lying in Indio, Ricer County. Flondo. October 3, 2000 EXHIBIT- A" Page 1 of 2 55 BK 115 PG 293 C C C L C • ♦ faaupar palloa a w 1ao1 f .1Z leow a 94rbf = ov WO/ Y 5s11w JO aed 71. IaaiYlp 11 S.a4 .«vf [a1L ran w.ldwiwlr aaaae .. laaoaC MD KI YO' rWiN.�lti 1/. Sala W ' QaueT i Id ll..t Iwl := Y W 14ylor+n.M. atl .w Npnp Apb -ay W d O ! SJSTWNlI'wf. MwO Ur tW ry4-a-.q M. a W W. a NU.10 W0 Y IM iWl OF BCfiOiap Y W '�3°NOi1P i ww Nwu w r a. aia ana ma. b w Ne.tl.aal t-- 0 ew .w • aaYeu d .01.1. 9 q w. Pda a — a o a.0 -TOY w N fua 00 3rW33*. w m (Joao d 116.94 9w1 b a pdK d t gp y dm ! 11� � Y a a 710-%d .a- f4��owl Wner.wt. b pr peW ar'w aorw, sancow b IM IlfM.A. It .w a.DAO �> MW au.w. Wagl. p gwtN aya a 11OOlY. o are Yldorso Y 7N.0S Iwl Y p Ada a b.pa.�[r. N 6f0i'IP [ • IaWco Y WJ N IfY b a ptlY Y w aW d-wr W d U.L 1.Waof 1. It n• LL111q k b. w �. $.- w hY BW d-'ap. p Wtu.o d 0000 W Y pa FOpO 0/' /LOWDQ Y KcawrWp Fb••Nw L CMfb. A Cf« . b .&I ..nay Oml 1 0« o r*.d Pro/.l bfnl Suppe« awd 11opWf. @mud b pmtk. Y W. able d FbWo. teal DA. .uaap w fflo0a M 111. groand, udr my b ". -pmiaYn. erd OW 4 b ocard. and eaffod. I Iuilar earWy IMI Ilu..uary rMal. Ib fWW.mYala of Ib YLdnupn f.eMka Slm0ora. m deFcflbd w CThWo 61017 al Ib nor�do bmvb ou" Cad. Wammt b f.3. CIl.1 417. lbf. «p 110 oWb anereaclrfNnb ..apl Yet aor fd o a 11 .a. N«cn to. 2000. Ibl r.DO .uepat Da dD^a«a and Ib «ipYpl fObq 94a1 W a iYrb..cm..d W4 aaDDo. /gs Zcloo Claflu A. Cr—. S y. Req. 140"16.0 251h SL V BW'/ FL 32M hSW Rw C" Su}y« (s61) 667 -woo Land. Noa « F«merry of Nabm Nyall r PREEWS0 AIIONYENT \ ABANDONED r Rftcw Mr •4p P'ICE qy Ip of gA04TED — UK I JJ 1l'uu 1 7 I GRAPHIC SCALE 120 0 60 120 240 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 120 IL i . 1 r 1 PELCM PANTE SURVEYED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Y b SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY E�R�agS�FKff REILL•I�O1�N��ED���P��D��R�Ib70 TO BE MAN MM MUNN IM /NO�aOF/�BA�RI r! u W , k 1 • 0 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES _ None. 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-031 - THE OAKS OF VERO, INC. - REZONE ±70.4 ACRES FROM A-1 TO RS -3 (NORTHEAST CORNER OF 12TH STREET AND 58TH AVENUE) (CLERK'S NOTE: ORIGINALLY LISTED AS NORTHWEST CORNER) PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 25, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE obert M. Keating, AIC ; ommu Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning s%f- FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning / �/ DATE: September 25, 2000 RE: The Oaks of Vero, Inc.'s Request to Rezone f70.4 acres from A-1 to RS -3 (RZON 2000-06-0213) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 3, 2000. This request is to rezone ±70.4 acres from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre). Depicted in Figure 1, the subject property is located at the northeast comer of 58" Avenue (Kings Highway) and 12" Street (Rosedale Road). The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site with single-family residences at a density that is consistent with the site's comprehensive plan land use designation. On August 24, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS - 3. October 3, 2000 57 I �� 295 The western 35.7 acres of the site were the subject of a previous application for a Planned Development Rezoning. That rezoning proposed a 95 lot single-family subdivision to be known as Brookfield. On March 23, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission, citing concerns over layout and compatibility with surrounding areas, denied that application. Figure 1: Location and Zoning of the Subject Property County land development regulations state that no new rezoning application shall be accepted within one year of the acceptance of a rezoning application for substantially the same land. Because the subject application involves a significantly larger site than the Brookfield application, the subject application does not cover substantially the same land as the Brookfield application. For that reason, the county can accept the subject application. Although low-density single-family residential development is the predominate land use in this area of the county (particularly east of 58h Avenue), the subject property consists of citrus groves and is zoned A-1. Land abutting the site on the north, however, is zoned RS -2, Single -Family Residential District (up to 2 units/acre), and contains several subdivisions. October 3, 2000 - 58 • The northern 551 feet of the site's eastern boundary abut an RS -3 zoned subdivision. The remainder of the site's eastern boundary abuts large A-1 zoned lots containing single-family houses and accessory storage buildings. To the south of the site, across 12`s Street, land is zoned either A-1 or RS -3 and, except for one subdivision, consists of citrus groves. West of the subject property, across 58`" Avenue and the Lateral `B" Canal, land is zoned A-1. Except for a large church with a school and day care facilities located at the southwest comer of 12' Street and 58d Avenue, land west of 58s' Avenue contains citrus groves. Future Land Use Pattern The subject property and properties to the north, south, and east are designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on the county future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. To the west of the subject property, land is outside the urban service area and is designated AG -1, Agricultural -1, on the county future land use map. The AG -1 designation permits agricultural uses and residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/5 acres. The subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. Being a citrus grove, the site does not contain any native uplands. The site is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of 22 feet NGVD. The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater lines extend to the site from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water lines extend to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Access to the site is provide by 58`x' Avenue and 12" Street. Classified as an urban minor arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 58" Avenue is a two lane road with 55 feet of public road right-of-way. This segment of 58`h Avenue is programmed for expansion to four lanes and 130 feet of public road right-of-way by 2003. The site is bounded on the south by 12`h Street. Classified as an urban collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 12" Street is a two lane road. Currently, the portion of 12' Street extending east from 58'' Avenue for a distance of 1,361 feet consists of 100 feet of public road right-of-way. The remainder of 12" Street that is adjacent to the subject property contains 50 feet of public road right-of-way. Ultimately, county plans call for 12`'' Street to consist of 100 feet of public road right-of-way from 58" Avenue to 43rd Avenue. October 3, 2000 59 BK I 153 PG 297 • In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. Specifically, this section will include: • an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; • an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and • an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for. Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate _ provision of _these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: f70.4 acres 2. Existing Zoning District: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) 3. Proposed Zoning District: RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Existing Zoning District: 14 Single -Family Units 5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Proposed Zoning District: 211 Single -Family Units 0 October 3, 2000 - .c BK I 15 PG 298 _I Transportation As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (50/6) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever is less. According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 211 single-family units on the subject property. Water With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 211 residential units, resulting in water consumption at a rate of 211 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 52,750 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 3,900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed rezoning. Wastewater Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 211 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 52,750 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. County wastewater service is available to the site from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of 875,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request. Solid Waste Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year. With the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 211 unit residential development would be anticipated to house approximately 485 people (2.3 X 211). For the subject request to meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 955 (485 X 1.97) cubic yards/year. A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of over 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a four year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the proposed zoning district. October 3, 2000 61 BK 5 PG 299 Drainage All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. In this case, the minimum floor elevation level -of -service standard applies, since the property lies within a floodplain. Consistent with Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 1.2, the finished floor elevation of any new buildings constructed within a floodplain must be elevated a minimum of six inches above the base flood level. Since the subject property lies within Flood Zone AE -22, which is a special flood hazard area located within the 100 -year floodplain, any development on the property must have a minimum finished floor elevation of no less than 22.5 feet above mean sea level. Besides the minimum elevation requirement, on-site retention and discharge standards also apply to this request. With the most intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface under the proposed zoning classification will be approximately 42.2 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, will be approximately 1,884,331 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level -of -service, the applicant will be required to retain approximately 1,373,227 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, the estimated pre -development runoff rate is 124.42 cubic feet/second. Based upon staff s analysis, the drainage level -of -service standards will be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, requiring retention of the 1,373,227 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property, and requiring that all finished floor elevations exceed 22.5 feet above mean sea level. As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process. Recreation A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed zoning district indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained. The following table illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus park acreage. 0 October 3, 2000 - 62 BK 1 15 PG 300 • • PARK INFORMATION LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) Project Demand (Acres) Surplus Park Acreage 4.0 1.9412 1 1,164 Concurrency Summary Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request. Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following objective and policies. Future Land Use Element Objective 1 Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern which reduces suburban sprawl. By allowing development of land currently within the urban service area at the density envisioned by the comprehensive plan, as opposed to expanding the urban service area, the county can efficiently support growth without creating suburban sprawl or sacrificing compactness. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. In addition, policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area. Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-1 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district October 3, 2000 63 BK 115 PG 301 I would permit residential uses no greater than the 3 units/acre permitted by the L-1 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12. Consistency Summary As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all applicable objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Compatihility with the Surrounding Area Staff's position is that granting the request to rezone the subject property to RS -3 will result in development which will be compatible with surrounding areas. Because single-family zoning districts border the subject property on the north, south, and east, the request is for the continuation of an existing zoning pattern. In fact, staff anticipates that, eventually, land that is along 58`h Avenue and within the urban service area will be dominated by single-family residential uses. With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural zoning on property rather than changing it when the underlying land use designation increases. This not only reflects the county's policy of using agricultural zoning as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that urbanization occurs incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods. At 70.4 acres in size, the subject property is large enough to buffer itself from the impacts of nearby agricultural uses. For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RS -3 zoning would be compatible with development in the surrounding area. The subject property does not contain any wetlands or native upland habitat. As a previously cleared site, the subject property is not environmentally significant nor environmentally important. Consequently, the proposed rezoning will not have any significant impacts on important environmental resources. Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for low-density single-family residential uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request. October 3, 2000 - 64 BK 1 15 PG 302 • • Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS -3 by adopting the attached ordinance. 1. Summary Page 2. Rezoning Application 3. Approved Minutes of the August 24, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 4. Rezoning Ordinance Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed the memorandum using a Power Point®outline displayed on the ELMO. (Outline on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board.) He advised that staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the rezoning. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Joseph Schulke, Schulke, Vittle, and Stoddard, represented the applicant, Pierre Paquette, who could not be present due to a death in the family. He advised that he felt this- was hiswas a perfect location for RS -3 development, within the utility service area, and believed it is compatible with the adjacent zoning districts. ffthere were questions, he would be pleased to answer them. There were no questions. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. October 3, 2000 65 RK 115 PG 303 ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Ordinance No. 2000-031 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for ±70.4 acres located at the northeast comer of 12' Street and 58'hAvenue, from A-1, Agricultural District (Up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (Up to 3 units/acre). ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 31 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±70.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 12m STREET AND 58m AVENUE, FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), TO RS -3, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: TRACT'S, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDMSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, October 3, 2000 - 66 BK 115 PG 304 • • ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 31 FLORIDA IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25; SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IN O.R. BOOK 114, PAGE 594 AND IN O.R. BOOK 1150, PAGE 2387, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH TRACT 6, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDMSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25; SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM LAND TO TRIPSON AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 134, PAGE 400, AND LESS LAND TO JO -BAR FARMS, INC. AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 135, PAGE 318, PUBLIC RECORD OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM HOMESTEAD PROPERTY COMPRISING THE SOUTH 298.3 FEET OF THE EAST 233 FEET OF SAID TRACT 6, AND LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IN O.R. BOOK 114, PAGE 504 AND IN O.R. BOOK 1150, PAGE 2387, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGIN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 6, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25; SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID TRACT 6, A DISTANCE OF 591.00 FEET; THEN RUN NORTH AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 6 A DISTANCE OF 50.00 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO LYING ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF 12TH STREET; FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTINUE NORTH AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 6, SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 248.30 FEET; THEN RUN EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH - - LINE OF TRACT 6 A DISTANCE OF 298.00 FEET; THEN RUN SOUTH AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 6 A DISTANCE OF 43.30 FEET; THEN RUN WEST AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 6 A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET; THEN RUN SOUTH AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 6 A DISTANCE OF 205.00 FEET AND TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF 12TH STREET; SAID POINT LYING 50.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 6; THEN RUN WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF 12TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 213.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IN O.R. BOOK 1150, PAGE 2387, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Be changed from A-1 to RS -3. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. October 3, 2000 67 I'll 115 N uft ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 31 This ordinance -shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 3'd day of October, 2000. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 2e day of September, 2000, for a public hearing to be held on the 3rd day of October, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner M a c h t , seconded by Commissioner S t a n b r i d g e , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Fran B. Adams A v e Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn n n t P n t Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht —A4t.e Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge AyQ Commissioner John W. Tippin A v e BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: _�_ o_ -V_ 19 Fran B. Adams, Chairman ATTEST BY: K. Barton, This ordinance was filed with the Departmentof State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Indian Rive Ca Approved Date William G. Collins 11, Deputy County Attorney Admlrn Legal W 77 Budget %e APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Dept Risk Mgr. Obert . K g, / Community Development Dir for October 3, 2000 - BIt 1 15 PG 3 0 6 68 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-032 - ZONING AMENDMENT FOR +26.4 ACRES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET SW 1/3 MILE WEST OF 43RD AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RS -3 REQUESTED BY GEORGE F. HAMMER, JR. TRUSTEE PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEIMMSIr FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 25, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator DE MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE err M. Keating, Al CP;o muni�__ elopment Dire Jctor THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning S •'C FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning DATE: September 25, 2000 RE: George F. Hamner, Jr., Trustee, Request to Rezone f26.4 acres from A-1 to RS -3 (RZON 2000-07-0021) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 3, 2000. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION This request is to rezone f26.4 acres from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre). Depicted in Figure 1, the subject property is located on the south side 9`h Street, SW (Oslo Road), approximately one third of a mile west of 43rd Avenue. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site with single-family residences at a density that is consistent with the site's comprehensive plan land use designation. On August 24, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS - 3. Currently, citrus groves are the predominate land use in this area of the county. Zoned A-1, the subject property consists of a former citrus grove. Although the site is mostly cleared, several small patches of citrus trees remain, mostly on the northern part of the site. The subject property also contains two man made lakes, both between one and half and two acres in size. Material excavated from these lakes was likely used for off site fill many years ago. October 3, 2000 BK 115 PG 307 I While a subdivision of single-family residences abuts the site on the east, citrus groves surround the subject property on the north, south and west. North and east of the subject property, land is zoned RS -3. To the south and northwest of the subject property, land is zoned A-1. To the west of the subject property, land is zoned A-1, except for land along 9`h Street, SW which is zoned RS -3. The subject property and all surrounding properties are designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on the county future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. The subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive by the cotttprehensive plan. Being a citrus grove, the site does not contain any native uplands. The site is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of 22 feet NGVD. October 3, 2000 - 70 The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Potable water lines extend -to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Although the site is within the service area of the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, collection lines do not currently extend to the site. Transportation System Access to the site is provide by 9`h Street, SW. Classified as a rural minor arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 9'h Street, SW is a two lane road with 60 feet of public road right-of-way. This segment of 9`h Street, SW is programmed for expansion to four lanes and 130 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020. In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. Specifically, this section will include: • an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; • an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and • an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for. Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±26.4 acres 2. Existing Zoning District: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) 3. Proposed Zoning District: RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre) October 3, 2000 71 BIS 115 PG 309 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Existing Zoning District: 5 Single -Family Units 5. Most hitense Use of Subject Property Under Proposed Zoning District: 79 Single -Family Units Transportation As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever is less. According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 79 single-family units on the subject property. Water With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 79 residential units, resulting in water consumption at a rate of 79 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 19,750 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 3,900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the aomnonat aemana generated by the proposed rezoning. Wastewater Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 79 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 19,750 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. If wastewater collection lines were extended to the sitq, centralized sewer service would be available to the site from the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 650,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request. Solid Waste Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year. With the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 79 unit residential development would be anticipated to house approximately 182 people (2.3 X 79). For the subject request to meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 359 (182 X 1.97) cubic yards/year. A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of over 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a four year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the proposed zoning district. October 3, 2000 - 72 GK 115 PG 310 L_J L_J Drainage All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin Vd the Indian _ River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. In this case, the minimum floor elevation level -of -service standard applies, since the property lies within a floodplain. Consistent with Stormwater Management Sub -Element Policy 1.2, the finished floor elevation of any new buildings constructed within a floodplain must be elevated a minimum of six inches above the base flood level. Since the subject property lies within Flood Zone AE -22, which is a special flood hazard area located within the 100 -year floodplain, any development on the property must have a minimum finished floor elevation of no less than 22.5 feet above mean sea level. Besides the minimum elevation requirement, on-site retention and discharge standards also apply to this request. With the most intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface under the proposed zoning district will be approximately 15.84 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25-year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, will be approximately 728,097 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level -of -service, the applicant will be required to retain approximately 536,433 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, the estimated pre - development runoff rate is 54.48 cubic feet/second. Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level -of -service standards will be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, requiring retention of the 536,433 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property, and requiring that all finished floor elevations exceed 22.5 feet above mean sea level. As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process. Recreation A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed zoning district indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained. The following table illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus park acreage. PARK INFORMATION LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) Project Demand (Acres) Surplus Park Acreage 4.0 0.7268 1,164 October 3, 2000 73 BK 115 PG 311 Concurrency Summary Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request. Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following objective and policies. Future Land Use Element Objective 1 Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern which reduces suburban sprawl. By allowing development of land currently within the urban service area at the density envisioned by the comprehensive plan, as opposed to expanding the urban service area, the county can efficiently support growth without creating suburban sprawl or sacrificing compactness. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. In addition, policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area. Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-1 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district would permit residential uses no greater than the 3 units/acre permitted by the L-1 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12. Consistency Summary As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all applicable objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff's position is that granting the request to rezone the subject property to RS -3 will result in development which will be compatible with surrounding areas. October 3, 2000 - % 115 PG 312 74 • • Because the RS -3 zoning district borders the subject property on the north, east and west, the request is for the continuation of an existing zoning pattern. In fact, the comprehensive plan anticipates that, eventually, land along Vh Street, SW, between 43'd Avenue and 58`s Avenue, will be dominated by low density residential uses. With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural zoning on property rather than changing it when the underlying land use designation increases. This not only reflects the county's policy of using agricultural zoning as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that urbanization occurs incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods. At 26.4 acres in size, the subject property is large enough to buffer itself from the impacts of nearby agricultural uses. For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RS -3 zoning would be compatible with development in the surrounding area. The subject property does not contain any wetlands or native upland habitat. Asa previously cleared site, the subject property is not environmentally significant or environmentally important. Consequently, the proposed rezoning will not have any significant impacts on important environmental resources. Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for low-density single-family residential uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request. Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS -3 by - — adopting the attached ordinance. 1. Summary Page 2. Rezoning Application 3. Approved Minutes of the August 24, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 4. Rezoning Ordinance October 3, 2000 75 BK I1PG313 I Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed the memorandum using a Power Point®outline displayed on the ELMO. (Outline on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board.) He advised that staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the rezoning. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Ordinance No. 2000-032 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for ±26.4 acres located on the south side of 9'' Street SW, approximately one-third of a mile west of 43' Avenue, from A- 1, Agricultural District (Up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RS -3, Single - Family Residential District (Up to 3 units/acre). ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 3 2 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR±26.4 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET SW, APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD OF A MILE WEST OF 43RD AVENUE, FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), TO RS -3, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 3 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and - WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and October 3, 2000 - 76 BK 1 15 PG 314 40 0 ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 3 2 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: TRACT 2, SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25; SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN GREEN ACRES ESTATES, PLAT 1, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 48, PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR CANAL AND ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. SAID PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GREEN ACRES ESTATES SUBDIVISION, PLAT #1, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2; THEN, RUN N89°40'47"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2, A DISTANCE OF 885.18 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2; THEN, RUN S00 ° 12'30"W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 2, A DISTANCE OF 1,330.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2; THEN, RUN S89°41'45"E ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2, A DISTANCE OF 885.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED GREEN ACRES ESTATES SUBDMSION, PLAT #1; THEN, RUN N00°12'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID GREEN ACRES ESTATES SUBDIVISION, PLAT #1, A DISTANCE OF 1,329.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR INDIAN RIVER FARMS SUB -LATERAL DITCH B-7 AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 48, PAGE 24 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 26.42 ACRES MORE OR LESS AND LYING WHOLLY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Be changed from A-1 to RS -3. October 3, 2000 77 BK 115 AG 315 I ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 0 3 2 All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 3rd day of October, 2000. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 2e day of September, 2000, for a public hearing to be held on the 3' day of October, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbridge , seconded by Commissioner T i p p i n , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Fran B. Adams —Y -P Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn A h s P n t. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin AVP BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BYI�' a,- A (I'��o Fran B. Adams, Chairman ATTEST BY: e, ey' r���o'�k This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the followmg da e: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS 4 2 -- Robert M. Keating, TdCP Community Development Dir for October 3, 2000 - 78 GK 1 15 PG 316 Man Hied Cn A* roved D:te Admin Legal G Budges ept D RISdc M �. • 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-120 - TAX EQUITY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT (TEFRA) HEARING - ESCAMBIA COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY SINGLE- FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 22, 2000: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 22, 2000 SUBJECT: TEFRA (TAX EQUITY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT) HEARING ESCAM 31A COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS FROM: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator The Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 5, 2000, approved holding a TEFRA (Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act) hearing to enable Escambia Housing to apply for District 9B Industrial Bond Allocation from the State. This will allow the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority to issue Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds Series in an amount not to exceed $100,000,000. Following the Public Hearing, if the Board of County Commissioners wishes to grant Escambia Housing the ability to apply for the Industrial Revenue Bond Allocation in District 9B, the Board must approve the Resolution, Interlocal Agreement and authorize the Chairman and staff to sign all necessary documents. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Resolution, Interlocal Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign all necessary documents. ATTACHMENTS Notice of TEFRA Hearing Summary of Program Resolution & Interlocal Agreement (Exhibit A) Notice of Intent to Issue Bonds and Request for Written Confirmation October 3, 2000 79 • I Assistant Administrator Baird explained the Escambia County Housing program utilizes tax exempt interest rates so low- and moderate -income first-time home -buyers can get a preferred mortgage rate on their homes. The County has issued bonds involved in this program for over seven years. The purpose is to help low-income people get into their own home and get the preferred interest rate. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution 2000-120 authorizing the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority to operate within the boundaries of IndianRiver County, to finance qualifying single-family mortgage loans on behalf of Indian River County; authorizing the Board to enter into agreements with the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority and to execute and deliver certain documents and instruments in connection therewith; approving a form of interlocal agreement; approving the issuance by the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority ofnot exceeding $100,000,000 Single -Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001(multi-countyprogram), pursuant to Section 174(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; providing that such bonds constitute limited, special obligations; and providing an effective date. October 3, 2000 - 80 BK 115 PG 318 • RESOLUTION NO. 2000-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AUTHORIZING THE ESCAMBIA COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY TO OPERATE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, TO FINANCE QUALIFYING SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE LOANS bN BEHALF OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; AUTHORIZING THE BOARD TO ENTER INTO AGREEME=NTS WITH THE ESCAMBIA COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY AND TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; APPROVING A FORM OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE ESCAM 31A COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY OF NOT EXCEEDING $100.000,000 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2001 (MULTI -COUNTY PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO SECTION 1470 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING THAT SUCH BONDS CONSTITUTE LIMITED, SPECIAL OBLIGATIONS; AND PROVIDING' AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 159, Part IV, Florida Statutes, (the "Act") authorized counties to create housing finance authorities to exercise powers of the Act within their boundaries or outside their boundaries with the consent of the governing body of the territory outside their area of operation; and WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners of Escambia County, Florida, (the "Escambia Board") on May 29, 1980, adopted Ordinance No. 80-12, by which it created the Escambia County Housing Finance Authority (the "Authority") and authorized the Authority to exercise all powers under the Act; and WHEREAS, there is no housing finance authority currently operating in Indian River County; and WHEREAS. pursuant to the Act, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, (the "Indian River Board") has found a shortage of affordable housing and capital for investment therein and a need for a housing finance authority - to function in Indian River County; and WHEREAS, it is not practicable at this time under existing Florida and Federal laws and regulations for a single local agency to issue its bonds for the purpose of implementing a single family housing program, although the shortage of such single family housing and capital for investment therein is continuing in Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Authority by resolution duly adopted on June 13, 2000 (the "Enabling Resolution"). authorized a plan of finance (the "Plan") for the issuance from time to time of not exceeding $400,000,000 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Multi -County Program); and WHEREAS, the Authority has indicated that it expects to issue its Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001 (Multi -County Program) (the "Escambia Bonds" or the "Bonds") in a principal amount not exceeding $100,000,000, exclusive of any amounts required for refunding purposes; and October 3, 2000 81 • WHEREAS, the Indian River Board desires to authorize certain actions as necessary in connection with participation in the Escambia Multi -County Single Family Housing Program and the issuance, sale, authentication and delivery of the Bonds by -entering into an Interlocal Agreement (the "Interlocal Agreement"); and WHEREAS, Section 147(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "Code") requires public approval of certain private activity bonds and the plan of finance therefor by an applicable elected representative or governmental unit following a public hearing and the Indian River Board constitutes an applicable elected representative or governmental unit; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(1) of the Code a public hearing was scheduled before the Indian River Board on behalf of the Indian Riser Board, the Escambia Board and the Authority for Tuesday, October 3, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. and notice of such hearing was given in the form required by the Code by publication more than fourteen (14) days prior to such hearing; and WHEREAS, the Indian River Board, has on October 3, 2000, held the public hearing and provided at such hearing reasonable opportunity for all interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing, on the issuance of the Bonds; and - WHEREAS, the Indian River Board diligently and conscientiously considered all comments and concerns expressed by such individuals; and WHEREAS, the Indian River Board desires to express its approval of the action to be taken pursuant to the Enabling Resolution and Chapter 159, Part IV, Florida Statutes, and as required by Section 1470 of the Code; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMIIIISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Section 1 Because of the continuing shortage of affordable single family housing and capital for investment therein in Indian River County and the continuing impediments to a bond issue to alleviate such shortages as to single family housing, it is hereby determined that the Indian River Board consents to the Authority exercising its powers to issue the Bonds and to implement a plan of finance to provide capital from sources of funds available to the Authority, including but not limited to a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds, and proceeds of obligations refunded by the Bonds, to establish a program to finance Mortgage Loans for single family housing within the statutory boundaries of Indian River County ("Mortgage Loans"); provided, that the Authority and Indian River County first enter into a written agreement setting forth the powers, duties and limitations of the Authority as they pertain to the use of said Bond proceeds within Indian River County and payment of the issuance costs for such Bonds. Section 2 In furtherance of the purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof the Chairman or Vice -Chairman and Clerk or Deputy Clerk of the Indian River Board are hereby authorized to execute such consents, intergovernmental agreements, applications, instruments or other documents as shall be required to implement such single family housing program and to provide for payment of Indian River County's proportionate share of costs of the costs thereof, including but not limited to the costs of issuance of such Bonds, all as shall be approved by counsel to Indian River County. October 3, 2000 - 82 r Section 3 The Interlocal Agreement, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. and made a part hereof, between Indian River County and the Authority is hereby approved. The officers of Indian River County are hereby authorized to enter into such interlocal agreements on behalf of Indian River County with such changes not inconsistent herewith as the officers executing.,,same may approve, such execution and delivery to be conclusive evidence of such approval. The appropriate officers of Indian River County are hereby further authorized to execute and deliver such other documents and instruments as may be necessary to implement such Interlocal Agreements, including, without limitation, application for up to the maximum available private activity bond volume allocations pursuant to Chapter 159. Part VI, Florida Statutes, for the purposes set forth in the Interlocal Agreement. Section 4 The Indian River Board hereby approves, within the meaning of Section 147(f) of the Code, the Authority's plan of finance and the issuance by the Authority from time to time of not exceeding $100,000,000 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds Multi -County Program, initially designated as Series 2001, for funding the Authority's program for Mortgage Loans, and such other action to be taken pursuant to the Enabling Resolution or Chapter 159, Part IV, Florida Statutes. Section 5 The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and all payments required under the proposed financing agreements, including the Interlocal _Agreement, shall be payable solely by the Authority from the proceeds derived by the Authority under the proposed financing agreements, and Indian River County shall never be required to (i) levy ad valorem taxes on any property within its territorial limits to pay the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds or to make any other payments provided for under the proposed financing agreements, or (ii) pay the same from any funds of Indian River County whatsoever. Adoption of this Resolution does not authorize or commit the expenditure of any funds of Indian River County to pay the costs of issuance of such Bonds. The Bonds are limited, special obligations and will not constitute a debt of the State of Florida, Indian River County, Escambia County, or other participating Counties or the Authority or other participating Housing Finance Authorities, but will be payable solely from payments made from the revenues generated from the Escambia Multi -County Single Family Housing Program. Section 6 All resolutions or parts thereof of the Indian River Board in conflict with the provisions herein contained are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby - superseded and repealed. October 3, 2000 83 BK 115 1'G 32 1 Section 7 This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Duly adopted in the regular session this 3i° day of October, 2000. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: �- QO" i (SEAL) Its Chairman, Fran B. Adams Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: BY: f Its: Cler , t K. SART Bo County mn4ssfoikers PATRICIA M. RIDGELY DEPUTY CLERK INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD AND HAS BEEN RECORDED IN TBE PUBLIC RECORDS ALONG WITH RESOLUTION 2000-120 10. COUNTYADMINISTRATOR'SMATTER- TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 769 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT (LABOR AND TRADESI Administrator Chandler reviewed a Memorandum of September 27, 2000: TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 27, 2000 SUBJECT: Teamsters Collective •Bargaining Agreement FROM: J es E. Chandler'oeun y Aa�dministrator October 3, 2000 84 BK9i5PG 322 • Attached for Board consideration is the proposed collective bargaining agreement with Teamsters Local No. 769. The terms were negotiated and agreed to by the County and Teamster bargaining teams. The agreement was submitted to the Teamster membership and ratified on September 25, 2000. I recommend approval of the agreement. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the agreement with the Teamsters Local No. 769, as recommended by staff. CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD 11.E-1. PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM POLICY The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 21, 2000: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrat FROM: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager DATE: September 21, 2000 SUBJECT: Purchasing Card Program Policy Background Information On February 1, 2000, the Board of Commissioners approved a resolution authorizing the issuance of Purchasing Cards for County purchases. The Purchasing Cana Program is designed to improve efficiency in processing small dollar purchases from vendors that accept the Visa credit card. This will allow cardholders to purchase approved commodities and services directly from certain vendors, thus reducing paperwork and the burden of tracking individual purchase orders (P.O.'s) and blanket P.O.'s. The Board has approved a Purchasing Card Agreement with First Union National Bank, and a Certificate of Borrowing Resolution. Staff has developed a set of policies and procedures to regulate the program. Before proceeding towards implementation, staff needs to obtain Board Approval of these policies. The policies are intended to ensure compliance with Florida Statutes, October 3, 2000 85 OK 1 15 PG 323 • set maximum spending limits, develop purchase and payment procedures, outline responsibilities of all participants in the program, and provide for disciplinary action if the cards are misused. Each Purchasing Card is issued to a named individual, and Indian River County is clearly shown on the card as the governmental buyer of goods and services. The cardholder's name is embossed on the card, and only the cardholder is authorized to use the cans. All transactions with the card are approved ordeclined (electronically at the point of sale) based on authorization criteria established by the County. Department Heads will have the ability to establish this criteria for each individual cardholder utilizing the following parameters: 1. Number of transactions allowed per day. 2. Number of transactions allowed per month. 3. Single purchase limit (not to exceed $500.00). 4. Monthly spending limit (not to exceed $2,500.00). 5. Approved merchant category codes. Prior to receiving a Purchasing Card, employees will undergo training and receive a copy of the Purchasing Card Policy. Then, the employee will sign a Purchasing Card Acceptance and Cardholder Agreement attesting that they have received a copy of the Policy, understand the guidelines, and agree to comply with them. After a Purchasing Card Policy is adopted by the Board, staff will proceed with implementation of the program. Initially, a pilot program will be put in place for selected departments. After a trial period of three (3) to six (6) months, the results of the program will be evaluated. The program will then be expanded to all departments within the County over the following year. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached Purchasing Card Policy and the Purchasing Card Acceptance and Cardholder Agreement. Attachments Purchasing Card Policy Purchasing Cana Acceptance and Cardholder Agreement October 3, 2000 - 86 9 0 Assistant Administrator Baird explained the purpose of the purchasing card program is to cut down the paperwork involved when employees must purchase items. All the rules and policies are set out in the 12 -page Purchasing Card Policy presented as part of the backup of the meeting. This program will also expedite emergency purchases. Chairman Adams thought it to be a great program which would save a lot time and money. In response to Chairman Adams' further questions, Assistant Administrator Baird advised Building & Grounds, Road and Bridge, Purchasing, and Computer Services will be the main departments involved in the initial program. These departments constantly have to purchase small, miscellaneous items and the cards will expedite the acquisition of those small items. There will be one or two cards in other departments. He estimated 60-70 cards will be issued initially. Open Purchase Orders will no longer exist. Receipts will be handed in on a daily basis and the County will also have an on-line service and be able to check what was charged on the previous day. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the Purchasing Card Policy and the form of Purchasing Card Acceptance and Cardholder Agreement submitted, as recommended in the Memorandum. 11.E.2. AUDITING SERVICES CONTRACT AWARDED TO HARRIS, COTHERMAN, &ASSOCIATES The Board reviewed a Memorandum. of September 27, 2000: October 3, 2000 87 t TO: Board of County Commissioners THRU: James E. Chandler. County Administrator DATE: September '_7.2000 SUBJECT: Audit Services FROM: Joseph A. Baird. Assistant County Administrator u% Pursuant to Section 11.45 Florida Statutes, Indian River County sent out a Request for Proposals for Audit Services for the fiscal years ending September 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004. Only one firm, Harris, Cotherman, & Associates responded to the request for proposals. As required by law, the audit selection committee was composed of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Tax Collector, Supervisor of Elections, Sheriff. and Property Appraiser, and a member of the Board of County Commissioners. On May 24, 2000 a meeting of the audit selection committee unanimously recommended that Harris, Cotherman, & Associates be engaged by the Board of County Commissioners to provide audit services for Indian River County. Harris. Cotherman. and Associates are our current auditors. The Board of County Commissioners on June 6, 2000 approved the audit selection committee's recommendation and authorized staff to begin negotiating with Harris. Cotherman, and Associates. The staff negotiating team is Joe Baird, Assistant County Administrator, and Jeffrey K. Barton. Clerk of Circuit Court. The negotiation team has met several times with Hams, Cotherman, and Associates and had numerous phone calls. Audit negotiations have been complicated for all local governments due to the enactment of the GASB 34 which is the new reporting standard that all governments must follow. GASB 34 requires governments to present -their financial statements differently than has been in the past; therefore, there is additional work that has to be done by both staff and the auditors. All local governments of our size are to implement GASB 34 by 2002 which is the middle of the proposed contract period. The audit selection committee felt early implementation of GASB 34 in 2001 was beneficial for all county interests, and all members of the committee voted for early implementation except the Tax Collector. The negotiation team feels Hams. Cothetanan, an -a' Associates has done a good job in the past and would continue to do so in the future. Harris. Cotherman. and Associates' initial offer was a five year contract price of an average of S 135.000 per year over a five year period, plus the 551.035 one time implementation cost for GASB 34. The GASB impiementation cost they mould allow to have been spread over severai years if Indian River County- wanted to do so. The Clerk's Office has agreed to do their own preparation of the CAFR including all financial statements and footnotes for the County Board of Commissioners and Constitutional Officers. The auditor _tyill be reponsible for the implementation of GASB 34 which includes review of MD&A letters, infrastructure valuation and depreciation method, accounting policies and associated internal control change; changes and identification of major funds, restate opening balances: and restatement of entries. October 3, 2000 - 88 is • Harris. Cotherman, and Associates has agreed to reduce their costs to a five year contract price of an average of 5123.000 per year over a five year period and there will be no implementation cost. Recommendation The negotiation committee would like to recommend that Harris, Cotherman, & Associates be awarded the contract of $615,000 for the five year period ($123,000 average per year) with no additional charge for the GASB 34. JAB/mg ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) awarded Harris, Cotherman, & Associates a five-year contract for auditing services for an average price of $123,000 per year (there will be no implementation cost), as recommended in the Memorandum. 11.G.1. NORTH COUNTYREGIONAL PARK -ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF FLORIDA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) PROJECT GRANT AGREEMENT Public Works Director James W. Davis reviewed a Memorandum of September 26, 2000: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works DireQy FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engin SUBJECT: North County Regional Park, IRC Project o. 9926 - Acceptance and Execution of FRDAP Grant DATE: September 26, 2000 October 3, 2000 89 BK 1 15 PG 327 F, • DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Indian River County Engineering Division is in receipt of a Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) Project Grant Agreement from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for improvements to be made for the North County Regional Park. Indian River County shall construct, or cause to be constructed, certain public outdoor recreation facilities and improvements consisting of a swimming pool, parking, restroom and other related support facilities. The FDEP shall pay, on a reimbursement basis, to Indian River County, funds not to exceed $150,000.00. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Alternative No. 1 - Indian River County Board of County Commissioners accept and execute the FRDAP Grant Agreement. Alternative No. 2 - Indian River County Board of County Commissioners decline to accept and execute the FRDAP Grant Agreement. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 and requests the Board to direct the Chairman to execute the grant agreement. 1. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program project Grant Agreement ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved stafFs recommendation as set out in the Memorandum. (Alternative No. 1) COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEh4ENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TBE BOARD October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 3 2 8 .f U 11.G.2. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-121 -RECANTING RESOLUTION NOS. 95-141 AND 95-142 CONCERNING CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND WATERMAINEXTENSION FOR VERO TROPICAL GARDENS SUBDIVISION AND A PORTION OF PARADISE PARK SUBDIVISION, UNIT #3 -P - Public Works Director James W. Davis reviewed and explained a Memorandum of September 8, 2000: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director AND (� Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine r�j' FROM: Robert S. Skok, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Vero Tropical Gardens Subdivision DATE: September 8, 2000 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 17, 1995 the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution Nos. 95-133 and 95-134 for water services and 95-135 and 95-136 for Paving and Drainage Improvements for the Vero Tropical Gardens Subdivision. On November 7, 1995 the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution Nos. 95-141 and 95-142 for confirming the special assessments in connection with paving and drainage improvements and a water main extension and providing for special assessment liens to be made of record. Over the past few years staff has been working with the St. John's River Water Management District to resolve wetlands issues within the subdivision. To develop this subdivision, severe mitigation would have to take place. To develop only the areas outside the wetlands areas would increase costs for the remaining lots that the improvements would serve. Vero Tropical Gardens was platted in two phases. The first phase was platted in 1957, and the second phase in 1962. The property is located on north side of SR 60, just west of I-95. The subdivision contains 420 lots having 145± property owners. In 1995 the Board of County Commissioners approved resolutions to provide Paving and Drainage Improvements along with Water Distribution services to the subdivision. In the fall of 1997, staff mailed -out Requests For Proposals for a Wetland Study. In February of 1998, Environmental Consulting Group, Inc. provided a wetland delineation report to the Indian River County Engineering Division. A map of the subdivision with the wetlands delineation line was drawn. The wetlands consisted of 84.7± acres of the 148.1± acre site (approximately 57%). The report stated that should Indian River County plan October 3, 2000 91 BK 1 15 PG 329 F, improvements to the wetland area, State and Federal agencies would request an explanation of intent to develop the area. The plan would need to include demonstration of avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts prior to considering a mitigation plan to offset wetland impacts. Approximately 29± acres of the wetlands area are considered to be forested wetlands. Since the time of the report, staff had held numerous meetings (on-site and in the office) with St. John's River Water Management District staff. Options staff has researched are as follows: 1. Develop the entire site, less forested wetland area. St. John's River Water Management District staff stated that the County would have to mitigate for the remainder of other wetlands (lesser quality) and demonstrate avoidance to minimize wetland impacts. Mitigation ratios range from 3:1 to 20:1 or more. Mitigating the remaining 55± acres would result in mitigation lands larger than the entire site. 2. Develop remaining portion of project, totally outside wetland area This would result in approximately 198 lots able to be developed. The problems with this option are: A. The main access to property is the perimeter road of 98`" Avenue and onto 26`h Street. This is approximately one mile of paving on two roads that are existing %z rights-of-way (35 feet wide). - - B. Services being provided to the 198 lots would raise assessments dramatically since fewer properties would benefit from the improvements. The property owners would be assessed more than the value of the property. C. Satisfying water quality requirements for SJRWMD will probably result in stormwater retention other than within road right-of-way, which would require purchasing some of the buildable lots, thereby reducing, even more, the number of buildable lots.. The attached colored rendering shows a concept in which the red and purple areas are an absolute minimum the County would have to acquire and preserve before St. John's River Water Management District would consider permitting the rest of the project (the Florida Power & Light easement would require a letter from them stating that they would never develop the property). 3. If the County were to drop the project from the list of active projects, property owners would still be able to get permits to build. State agencies could -not deny property owners of building on their lots, but the property owners would have to work with the agencies to fulfill possible mitigation requirements. Staff feels there are no viable solutions to the problems associated with this project that would be financially beneficial to the property owners or Indian River County. Staff recommends abolishing the past assessments and dropping the project from the County list of active projects. Since 1995, staff has spent countless hours with wetland studies, concept drawings, agency meetings, etc., and to date we still do not have a feasible project. Staff also recommends the costs of such studies, $6,143.55 (actual cost paid to consultant), be absorbed by the County and not assess the property owners. October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 330 Director Davis advised that staffwould be happy to meet with owners of multiple lots in the area to try to identify a program different from the one approved in 1995 which has been impeded by the extensive wetlands there. Commissioner Stanbridge commented that this definitely is a wetland area and should -ep not be built upon. The Department of Transportation was looking for some stormwater areas for SR60 and this could possibly be one of them. She agreed with the recommendation. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the County's costs of studies for the project in the amount of $6,143.55 be absorbed by the County and not assessed to the property owners and adopted ResolutionNo. 2000-121 to recant past ResolutionNos. 95-141 and 95-142 which confirmed the special assessments in connection with paving and drainage improvements, and awater main extension, respectively, and provided for special assessment liens to be made of record to Vero Tropical Gardens Subdivision and a portion ofParadise Park Subdivision, Unit #3. RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 121 A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO RECANT PAST RESOLUTION NOS. 95-141 AND 95-142 WHICH CONFIRMED THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, AND A WATER MAIN EXTENSION, RESPECTIVELY, AND PROVIDED FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS TO BE MADE OF RECORD TO VERO TROPICAL GARDENS SUBDIVISION AND A PORTION OF PARADISE PARK SUBDMSION, UNIT #3 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County adopted Resolution No. 95-141 on November 7, 1995, which confirmed a Special Assessment in October 3, 2000 09] r A RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_121 connection with Paving and Drainage Improvements and provided for Special Assessment Liens to be made of record, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed Resolution No. 95-142 on November 7, 1995, which confirmed a Special Assessment in connection with a water main extension and provided for Special Assessment Liens to be made of record, and WHEREAS, the Engineering Division Staff has unsuccessfully worked with the St. John's River Water Management District to develop a conceptual plan to minimize wetland impacts and obtain a feasible project, and WHEREAS, it is considered that a plan to develop areas outside of wetland areas only would not be financially beneficial to the property owners or Indian River County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The Special Assessments that were approved through Resolutions 95-141 and 95-142 and associated liens that were made of record be recanted. 2. The project of designing and constructing paving and drainage improvements and construction of a water main extension to Vero Tropical Gardens Subdivision and a portion of Paradise Park Subdivision, Unit #3 be removed from the County List of Active projects. 3. Any escrowed funds received from property owners within said subdivision for the purpose of the above stated improvements be refunded. October 3, 2000 - 94 BK 1 15PG 332 RESOLUTION NO. 2000--L2-j-- The 000-L The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner. Stanbridge , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner M a c h t , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams A y e Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Absent Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day Of- O. t n h r , 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By �0,1 18 0,4a, ,1,0 FRAN B. ADAMS, CHAIRMAN Attest: lee=y K. Barton, Clerk 11.G.3. ARTIFICIAL REEF GRANT AGREEMENTS - FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 25, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator f THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director THROUGH: Jeffrey R. Tabar, P.E.�� Coastal Engineer J FROM: Jonathan C. Gorham, Ph.D. Environmental Analyst J(� October 3, 2000 95 SUBJECT: Artificial Reef Grant Agreements with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission DATE: September 25, 2000 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS --- Grant Agreement No. 00097 Following a successful project in 2000, the County has been awarded another Artificial Reef Grant from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC). The amount for the grant is $20,000 for the first year of a multi-year study to investigate and evaluate fish populations on the four artificial reefs built in 2000. The objective of this study is to compare the fish populations on two reefs that are heavily fished with two otherwise identical reefs that are not fished. This study is a pilot research project to evaluate the role of artificial reefs in fisheries resource enhancement, and will be the second of its type in the United States. The study will be a co-operative effort including the County, Florida Tech researchers, and the Sebastian Inlet Sportfishing Association. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS County staff has reviewed the attached agreements and finds the conditions acceptable. The first phase of the project must be completed by June 30, 2001. The grant agreement is on a cost reimbursement basis. The alternatives are as follows: Alternative No. 1 Approve the Artificial Reef Grant Agreement for $20,000 on a cost reimbursement basis. Funding to be from the Beach Preservation Fund. Alternative No. 2 Deny the Grant Agreements. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby approving Grant Agreement No.00097. Funding to be from the Beach Restoration Fund. ATTACHMENT Agreement No. 00097 - Florida Artificial Reef Program October 3, 2000 - ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved Artificial Reef Grant Agreement No. 00097 for $20,000 on a cost -reimbursement _ ml basis, as recommended in the Memorandum. (Alternative No. 1.) COPY OF PARTLALLY EXECUTED GRANT AGRE DAEIVT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.4. FAIRGROUNDS AGRICULTURALARENA-AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES "ACS) AGREEMENTS #4031 AND #4617 (AUDIT LANGUAGE) Public Works Director James W. Davis reviewed a Memorandum of September 22, 2000: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director_ - - - SUBJECT: Fairgrounds Agricultural Arena - Amendment to FDACS Agreements #4031 and #4617 DATE: September 22, 2000 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Since the two Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services grants that were acquired to construct the Fairgrounds Agricultural Exhibit building totaled more than $300,000, the State requires a "state single or project -specific audit" be conducted. The attached two amendments to both contracts is presented to the Board for approval to include the audit language. October 3, 2000 97 �� M RECONMMATIONS AND FUNDING Staff -recommends the approval of the two amendments to Contract FDACS #4031 and #4617 and authorization for the Chairman to execute the amendments. Since the grants will be audited as part of the County's annual audit, no additional funding will be required. ATTACFENT Ref. Memo and two amendments ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the two amendments to contract FDACS #4031 and #4617 and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as recommended in the memorandum. ANMQMMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TAE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.H.1. BID #2062 - DIXIE HEIGHTS WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT - A PORTION OF DIXIE GARDENS AND THE PINEY OAKS SUBDIVISIONS - UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - TRI -SURE CORPORATION The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 25, 2000: DATE: September 25, 2000 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY CONMUSSIONERS THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator Donald Hubbs, P.E. Director of Utility Services SL_/ Thomas Frame, General Services Directo , cJ 4w.s, FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing ManagerJA4,,_ SUBJECT:,-, Bid Award: IRC 2062 Dixie Heights Water Assessment Project A portion of Dixie Gardens and the Piney Oaks Subdivision Utilities Department October 3, 2000 - 98 BK 1 15 PG 3 3 6 0 0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Bid Opening Date: Advertising Dates: Ad Notices Mailed to: Replies: VENDOR Tri -Sure Corporation Auburndale, Fl September 6, 2000 at 2:00 P.M. August 11, & 18, 2000 Fifty (50) Vendors Three (3) Vendors BID TOTAL $1,074,351.20 Maxwell Contracting $1,417,000.00 Cocoa, Fl Asphalt Consultants $1,578,844.40 Boca Raton, F1 RECOMMEND ID BID AMOUNT: ESTIMATED BUDGET SOURCE OF FUNDS % REC0uIl fiNDATION $1,074,351.20 $1,950,000.00 10 Utilities Assessments/Work in Progress/ Dixie Heights 473-000-169-384-00 Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Tri -Sure Corporation as the low bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition, staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approval of the attached sample agreement and authorization for the Chairman to execute said agreement when requirements are met and approved as to form by the County Attorney. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) awarded Bid #2062 to Tri -Sure Corporation and approved that sample agreement and authorized the Chairman to execute such an agreement when requirements are met and approved as to form by the County Attorney, as recommended in the Memorandum. October 3, 2000 �Wj BK 115 PG 3 3 7 I BID DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO TBE BOARD 11.H.2. RESOLUTION NOS. 2000-122 AND 2000-123 - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III A - 1) RESOLUTIONS I AND 11 - AND 2 SUBSCRIPTIONTO CITY OF SEBASTIANRESOLUTIONNO. R-96-48 The Board reviewed Memoranda of September 25, 2000 and September 27, 2000: DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADNIINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P. . DIRECTOR OF UTILITY PP Iq PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ES NT PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -A INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO UW -97 -16 -DS RESOLUTIONS I AND 11 BACKGROUND • On September 29, 1995, Indian River County entered into an Agreement with the City of Sebastian to assume ownership of the City's water distribution and wastewater collection systems. As a part of the contract, the County agreed to expand the water distribution system. On June 18, 1996, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Option 1 in order for the County to proceed with the installation of water lines as set forth in the Inter -local Agreement between Indian River County and the City of Sebastian. (See attached copy of minutes -Exhibit 1.) Said Agreement provided for the transfer of the City of Sebastian's water and wastewater system to Indian River County. On May 2, 2000, at a public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners approved Phase 11-D &- II- E(Combined) , which is presently under construction and should be completed by August 2001. (See attached agenda item and copy of minutes —Exhibit 2.) Staff is now ready to proceed with Phase III -A ANALYSIS Within the Phase III -A project area, bordered by Barber Avenue, to the East, with Periwinkle Drive, along the South and West and Caravan Terrace to the North, there are 861 lots and tracts, and approximately 384 homes, to benefit from this project. Typical platted lot sizes are .25 acre, plus or minus. October 3, 2000 100 • More effective management of project construction, inspections, cash flows, and interaction with property owners is being accomplished by having divided Phases U and III into smaller projects. This may enable more utility construction contractors to bid on these projects possibly making the bid process more competitive. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment projects, as divided into parts A, B, C, D & E, for Phase III (Exhibit 3). Phases 11-D & H -E were combined to adhere with scheduling agreed upon with the City of Sebastian and to complete the remainder of Phase H (North of CR 512). Phase H -E will serve the City of Sebastian municipal complex, as well'at provide potable water and fire protection to an area noted for failing well systems. The City of Sebastian is waiting for the completion of the water line installation in order to complete road & drainage improvements and comply with bonding requirements, Project No. Lots Parcel I.D. Locations NosJ I ALL OF PHASE III IS SOUTH OF CR 512 & Homes SOiJTHWEST OF BARBER STREET III -A UW -97 -16 -DS 861 773 / 384 South of Caravan Terrace with Perwinkle Drive along the South & West III -B UW -97 -17 -DS 540 476 / 230 East of Laconia St.& West of Shakespear St.. Between Crvstal Mist & Lanfair Ave's II -C UW -97 -18 -DS 1 900 822 / 402 Between Laconia & Barber St's , between Bay-frontTerrace and Roll' Hills (Lansdowne) II -D UW -97 -19 -DS 698 639 / 232 _East of Laconia St., between Clearmont & Capon Streets. II -E UW -97 -20 -DS 735 654 / 276 West of Laconia St, between Granduer & Gladiola Avenue's Total r343,364 /1.524 South of CR 512 and SW of Barber Street Engineering design has been completed by the staff of the Department of Utility Services for Phase III -A We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project, as outlined herein. A summary assessment roll for Phase III -A is attached (Exhibit 4). The full assessment roll is on file in the commission office. This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water line route. Financing will be from the assessment fund 473, account number 473-000-169- 489. If needed, inter -fund borrowing will be available from the capacity fee fund 472. The estimated project cost and amount to be assessed for Phases III -A is $ 1.856,564.20 (rounded) (Exhibit -5). The estimated cost per square foot is $0.202375 (rounded). The actual assessed cost as with any project will _ be determined based on actual competitive bid prices. On September 25. 2000, a letter u -as sent to the City Manager, of the City of Sebastian, with a copy of a draft agenda item and a map of the project area (Exhibit 6). RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Resolutions I and II and set the public hearing date. LIST OF EXHIBITS: 1 -June 18, 1996 BCC minutes 4 -Summar• assessment roll 2 -May 2.2000 BCC minutes 5 -Estimated Project cost 3 -Map of Project area 6 -Letter to City of Sebastian October 3, 2000 101 Bli t 1 PG 339 • I Is R vE,p Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY �'LORI�A " Board Certified, City, County & Local Government Law Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney' William G. Collins IL Deputy County Attorney September 27, 2000 MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners From: Paul G. Bangel, County Attomeyll�q12 ev Re: Sebastian Water Expansion Special Assessment Section 6.07(B) of the Interlocal Agreement Providing for the Transfer of the City of Sebastian Water and Wastewater System, dated September 20,1995, contains a sixty-day notice provision whereby the County provides the City with notice of a proposed special assessment in orderforthe Cityto consider undertaking the project and imposing a special assessment. Section 7.07 of the agreement provides for a waiver to be "executed in writing by all parties hereto." By Resolution No. R-96-48, a copy of which is provided herewith, the City of Sebastian waived the above -referenced sixty-day notice requirement. A certified copy of the resolution will be made available for inclusion in the Board's records. It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners subscribe to the waiver contained in City of Sebastian Resolution No. R-96-48. Recommendation: It is recommended thatthe Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute a document subscribing to City of Sebastian Resolution No. R-96-48. PGB Enclosure October 3, 2000 - BK 1 15 PG 340 102 49 County Attorney Bangel pointed out there were two matters to be considered at this meeting concerning the subject. He suggested the motion for the acceptance of/ subscription to the waiver be done first. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDS) BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) authorized the Chairman to execute a document subscribing to City of Sebastian ResolutionNo. R-96- 48, 96- 48, as recommended by staff. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution No. 2000-122 providing for the Sebastian Area Phase III -A Water Expansion (an area south of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Drive along the south and west); providing the total estimated cost, method of payment of assessments, number of annual installments, and legal description of the area specifically served. RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 122 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE SEBASTIAN AREA PHASE III -A WATER EXPANSION (AN AREA SOUTH OF CARAVAN TERRACE WITH PERIWINKLE DRIVE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to Phase III -A of the Sebastian Area (an area located south of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Drive along the South and West), hereinafter referred to as Project No. UW -97 -16 -DS; October 3, 2000 103 B1{ 1 1 PG 3 4 1 C7 I is NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 773 parcels in an area located south of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Drive along the South and West, and that the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County. 2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $1,856,564.20 or $0.202375 per square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments. 3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.202375 per square foot shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code. 4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall be - interest until paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners wF the project is completed. 5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility Services. 6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments. 7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing as required by Section 206.04. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner s t a n h rhe and the motion was seconded by Commissioner T i o a in , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Absent Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 31d day of October. 2000. Att Barin, CI By. _ Deputy Clerk October 3, 2000 - BX 1 15 PG 342 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Fran B. Adams, Chairman 104 0 • ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution No. 2000-123 setting a time and place at which the owners of properties located in the Sebastian Phase III -A Water Expansion Area (in an area south of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Drive along the south and west) and other interested persons, may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing the water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property benefitted thereby. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 12 1_ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE SEBASTIAN PHASE III -A WATER EXPANSION AREA (IN AN AREA SOUTH OF CARAVAN TERRACE WITH PERIWINKLE DRIVE ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST) AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO - — THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 2000-J_22_, determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 773 parcels located in an area south of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Drive along the south and west; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.202375 per square foot; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County October 3, 2000 105 • Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, October 24, 2000, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. 4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner ctanh,-;,j„e , and the motion i was seconded by Commissioner Tip p n , and, upon being put to avifte, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Absent Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye - The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of October, 2000. Att K Barton, B Deputy Clerk Attachment ASSESSMENT ROLL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Fran B. Adams, Chairman ASSESRI E= ROLL ATTACHED TO ORIGINAL RESOLUTION NO. 2000-123 SUBSCRIPTION TO AND CERTIFIED COPY OF CITY OF SEBASTIAN R-9648 ARE ON FILE IN IBE OFFICE OF TBE CLERK TO THE BOARD October 3, 2000 - 106 1 LJ 11.H.3. PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXPANSION LOOPING PROJECT ALONG INDIAN RIVER DRIVE SOUTH OF SEBASTIAN CITY LIMIT TO US#1 - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT - NANCY T. MOON Utility Services Director Donald K Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of September 5, 2000: DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. l 4 DIRECTOR OF UT LI TY S 1 PREPARED STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E. AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER BY: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES SUBJECT: DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXPANSION LOOPING PROJECT ALONG INDIAN RIVER DRIVE SOUTH OF SEBASTIAN CITY LIl*IIT TO US #1 BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS The residents along Indian River Drive have complained of the substandard quality of their well water for several years. Area residents along Indian River Drive have been requesting County drinking water due to failing and substandard water quality of their private wells. The Utility attempted to initiate a water assessment project along the corridor, but there was only marginal support of the assessment. Less than 48% of the property owners supported the proposed assessment because some of the larger properties would pay a larger assessment. The area just north along of Indian River Drive (within the City limits) is currently served with County water, which had been initiated and installed at the request of the City of Sebastian Council, in conjunction with miscellaneous Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) streetscape improvements along the Drive. Area residents along the southern portion of the Drive, which are not currently served by County water, are the next to receive FDOT grant funding for Streetscape Improvements. FDOT's projected timeframe for completing the streetscape improvements is the first quarter of 2001. Installation of a water main along the Drive for the southern portion will also complete a water main loop, improve water quality and increase available fire flow for the entire Indian River Drive corridor. A vicinity map of the proposed water main route is depicted in Exhibit -A of the attached Developer's Agreement. Indian River Drive has been scheduled through the FDOT for Streetscape improvements. These improvements include as a minimum, sidewalks, low-level street lighting, crosswalks, drainage inlets, males, driveway culverts, etc. These improvements have been funded through a State grant. The Utility has the option to wait until a majority of the property owners' desire County water or consider installing the water main now and attempt to recover some of the project costs as residents connect to the system. Waiting to install the water main after the FDOT Streetscape is implemented will add substantially to the cost. Installing the water main at a later date after FDOT has completed the Streetscape October 3, 2000 107 L._J Improvements will necessitate replacing those improvements previously installed and paid for by the FDOT grant. Staff has considered the impact for delaying the installation of the water main until supported by the property owners. Delaying this project will increase future capital construction costs and will result in needless waste of Public funds on streetscape restoration (sidewalks, street lighting, etc.). Nancy Moon is a full time resident of Indian River Drive. Nancy Moon and her neighbors have repeatedly requested an extension of the County's Water System to serve their properties. Mrs. Moon has requested to enter into an agreement (Developer's Agreement) with the County to construct the necessary water mains to serve her property and adjacent neighboring properties. A Developers' Agreement between Nancy Moon and the County is included as AttachmentA. The cost for the improvements is presented in Exhibit -B of the Developer's Agreement. Project cost recovery will be through line extension charges as a mechanism for recovering a portion of the project costs. The prevailing line extension charge, capacity charge, connection fees and other recovery costs shall be imposed on the customers) as they make connection to the new water main. The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Developer's agreement as presented, and authorizes the Chairman to execute the same. Stn$ if authorized by the Board, will strive to complete the proposed water main prior to FDOT's installation of their scheduled Streetscape Improvements. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: AttachmentA Developer's Agreement with Nancy Moon with Exhibits A & B. ACCOUNT INFORMATION: ACCOUNT NO: 472 NAME: Utility Capacity Charge Fund AMOUNT: $222,000.00 Chairman Adams thought it was a wise_ aggressive schedule, to act instead of react and applauded Director Hubbs for it. ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) approved the Developer's Agreement withNancy T. Moon for the construction of off-site utilities and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as set out and recommended in the Memorandum. e_ -_- October 3, 2000 - 108 • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD _ B.A. CHAIRMAN ADAMS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-124 - EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AMENDED The Board reviewed the proposed resolution in the backup for the meeting. Commissioner Stanbridge thought the committee needed immediate attention, new members, and a new direction. Presently there is a parochial approach to service in the Emergency Services Department instead of a planned approach, and she thought the County needed to go back to that. A new committee could re-evaluate the mission and set some new goals. Chairman Adams agreed and recalled that the original committee was put in place to bring together all volunteers and various fire districts. She thought the County is moving now to a larger level of service. There are new concerns that need to be addressed by a fresh committee. Before the new committee is formed and convened, Commissioner Stanbridge wanted the Board to direct the Emergency Services Director to identify the existing problems and determine and recommend ways and means to resolve them. She stressed that it needs to - be done within his department, without any interference by anyone. She felt confident that Director Wright could find an internal approach through his upper management, the firemen, the paramedics, and could come up with some solutions, or at least identify the problems. One of the problems she would like addressed, as they plan for the ambulance at Station 6, is to also consider other stations that may need ALS engines, such as Stations 3 and 7 which have larger call volumes, but no service. She felt that Director Wright along with his staff could address those concerns and report to the committee when it meets, so there will be October 3, 2000 109 • something on their agenda. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution 2000-124 restructuring the Indian River County Emergency Services District Advisory Committee, amending Resolution 91-93, relieving current members of the Indian River County Emergency Services District Advisory Committee of their duties, and providing an effective date. _ Commissioner Stanbridge understood there was no need for a motion on her direction to staff and assumed that would go forward, and Chairman Adams confirmed Commissioner Stanbridge's understanding and assumption. RESOLUTION 2000- 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER' COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESTRUCTURING THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AMENDING RESOLUTION 91- 93, RELIEVING CURRENT MEMBERS OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THEIR DUTIES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 103 of The Code of Indian River County (Ordinance 90-20) provides for the establishment of advisory boards; and WHEREAS, by Resolution 91-93 the Board of County Commissioners created the Indian River County Emergency Services District Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, it is the will of the Board of County Commissioners to amend the composition of the Indian River County Emergency Services District Advisory Committee, October 3, 2000 - 110 EK 1 15 PG 348 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, as follows: Paragraph 1 of Resolution 91-93 of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County is hereby amended to read as follows: There is hereby created an Emergency Services District Advisory Committee to be composed of ten (10) members with membership and the initial terms of office as follows: One member of the Board of County Commissioners selected by the Board of County Commissioners for a term which is coterminous with his/her present term on the Board of County Commissioners, who shall serve as chairman of the Emergency Services District Advisory Committee; Five members, each one appointed respectively by a member of the Board of County Commissioners for initial terms of four (4) years, such appointments being announced at a meeting or meetings of the Board of County Commissioners; Four members, each one appointed respectively by the city councils of the City of Fellsmere, the Town of OrcHiid, the City of Sebastian, and the City of Vero Beach, for initial terms of two (2) years. Following the initial terms, all members' terms, except that of the member of the Board of County Commissioners, whose term shall be coterminous with his/her term on the Board of County Commissioners, shall be four (4) years. 2. Paragraph 4 of Resolution 91-93 is hereby amended to read as follows: The Indian River County Emergency Services District Advisory Committee shall be governed by such laws, ordinances, and resolutions, that govern such advisory boards. 3. This resolution shall become effective upon the adoption thereof by the Board of County Commissioners. Current members of the Indian River County Emergency Services District Advisory Committee shall be relieved of their duties as members thereof, effective at such time as the reconstituted Emergency Services District Advisory Committee holds its first meeting, without further action of the Board of County Commissioners to discharge them. October 3, 2000 111 o ■ • The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner T i o p i n and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Commissioner John W. Tippin Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge AVP Absent Ave Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this _3r d day of October , 2000. Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk By Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By1Zea,4.- 1,6 Ote� Fran B. Adams Chairman B.C. COMMISSIONERMACHT- TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR 58TH AVENUE ajINGS HIGHWAYQ Commissioner Macht had recently attended dedication services at the new church on 58'h Avenue and saw some of the traffic problems and congestion on 58'h Avenue. He thought there was a need to accelerate the plans for completing the widening of 58' Avenue and perhaps 66' Avenue to Oslo Road and paving the intersections at 8' and 12' Streets. He felt it was important to have some alternate routes to get to SR 60. Also he thought a traffic signal at 8' Street should be strongly considered for safer movement of traffic at that intersection. Chairman Adams understood he wanted staff to look at doing as he had suggested. October 3, 2000 - 112 13.E.1. COMMISSIONER TIFFIN - RESOLUTION 2000-125 MEMBERSHIP OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INCREASED TO INCLUDE A MEMBER Pi REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURING TASK FORCE The Board reviewed the proposed resolution in the backup for the meeting. Commissioner Tippin brought this request from the Economic Development Council whose members desired to have a representative from the Manufacturing Task Force on the EDC. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, to add a representative from the Manufacturing Task Force -to the Economic Development Council. County Attorney Bangel pointed out thathe had understood and drafted the resolution "to include a member of the manufacturing community". Commissioner Tippin responded that there is already a member from the manufacturing community, therefore, the resolution should read a member of the Manufacturing Task Force. County Attorney Bangel understood the correction and stated he would make the correction in the resolution prior to the Chairman signing it. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the Board unanimously (4-0 Vice Chairman Ginn absent) adopted Resolution No. 2000-125 amending Resolution No. 93-175, increasing the membership of the Economic Development October 3, 2000 113 BK 115 PG 35 1 F", Council to include one representative of the Manufacturing Task Force. RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 12 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-175, INCREASING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL TO INCLUDE ONE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURING TASK FORCE. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 93-175 the Board of County Commissioners created an Economic Development Council; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 93-175 established the initial membership of the Economic Development Council; and WHEREAS, it would be in the public interest to increase the membership of the _ Economic Development Council to include one representative of the Manufacturing Task Force; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS that Paragraph 1 of Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 93-175 is amended to increase the membership of the Economic Development Council to include one representative of the Manufacturing Task Force. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner T i p p i n , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Macht and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Absent Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of October , 2000. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: J. K. Barto er ^=-4,, /� n B Fran B. Adams, Chairman Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY t� PAUL G.(PANGEC COUNT ATTORNEY October 3, 2000 - 114 BK 1 15 PG 352 13.E.2. PATRICK FALLER APPOINTED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURING TASK FORCE ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Ginn absent) appointed Patrick Faller as the Manufacturing Task Force representative to the Economic Development Council. 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT None. U.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are being prepared separately. - 14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD None. October 3, 2000 115 BK 115 PG 353 I -I There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 9:37 a.m. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Minutes approved a 0 October 3, 2000 - 116 OK 115 PG 354 Fran B. Adams, Chairman 0 is