HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/17/2000MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2000 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25U' Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fran B. Adams, Chairman District 1
Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman District 5 James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Kenneth R. Macht District 3 Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Ruth M. Stanbridge District 2 Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
John W. Tippin District 4 Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
BACKUP
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES
2. INVOCATION . Rev. Jack Isleib, Christian Outreach, Inc.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. Caroline D. Ginn
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
AMMONS: 10.B. Calpine Eastern - Proposed Power Generating Facility
Letter of Intent
9.A 1. Additional Backup
CORRECTIVE PAGES: 7.G. and 711 Pages 39 and 46
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Representative from Senator Patsy Kurth's office to present Florida
Recreation Develoment Assistance Program (FRDAP) check for
North County Regional Park
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of September 19, 2000
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
Report of ConWctions, September, 2000
BK 1 15 PG 468
L
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated October 5, 2000) 1-11
C. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated October 6, 2000) 12-13
D. 2001 Holiday Schedule
(memorandum dated October 9, 2000) 14
E. Approval of Renewal of a Class A Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity for the EMS Division of the
Department of Emergency Services to Provide ALS/BLS
Pre Hospital Emergency Medical Services
(memorandum dated October 2, 2000) 15-30
F. Arbitrage Rebate and Opinion Services Contract
(memorandum dated October 11, 2000) 31-34
(deferred from BCC meeting of October 10, 2000)
G. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement between Indian
River County and Pine Lake Mobile Home Estates, Inc.
(memorandum dated September 19, 2000) 35-41
H. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement between Indian
River County and Quail Run, Inc., a Manufactured Home
Community
(memorandum dated September 19, 2000) 4248
I. Interlocal Agreement between Indian River County and the
City of Fellsmere Regarding the Old School
(memorandum dated October 11, 2000) 49-60
J. Appointment to Old School Restoration Advisory Group
(memorandum dated October 11, 2000) 61
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
BK 115 PG 469
BACKUP
9. PUBLIC ITEMS PAGES
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Indian River County's Request for Special Exception
Use Approval for the North County Regional Park
(Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated October 9, 2000) 62-73
2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR
±39 ACRES LOCATED ±650 FEET EAST OF 661"
AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 451" STREET,
FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1
UNrr/5 ACRES), TO RS -2, SINGLE-FAMILY RESI-
DENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 2 UNITS/ACRE); AND
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVER-
ABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE
Clemente Vallejo's Request to Rezone ±39 Acres
from A-1 to RS -2 (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated October 2, 2000) 74-88
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Board Consideration of Agenda Policy Regarding
Public Discussion Items
Requests by Frank Zorc and Sidney Turner to
Speak Regarding Free Speech 89-90
2. Request from Nancy B. Wood of Country Club
Pointe Homeowners Association to Speak Regarding
City Airport Noise
(letter dated October 9, 2000) 91-93
3. Request by Bibble Irvin to Speak on Breaking
News about Sand Dredging Projects
(letter received October 9, 2000) 94
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMIMSTRATOR'S MATTERS
Proposed Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting
(memorandum dated October 11, 2000) 95
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
BACKUP
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):, PAGES
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Change Order No. 1 for South County Park
Improvements, Phase II
(memorandum dated October 4, 2000) 96-98
2. Roseland Area Stormwater Improvements — Work
Order No. 8 to the Professional Civil Services
Master Agreement between Carter Associations,
Inc. and Indian River County, Florida
(memorandum dated October 4, 2000) 99-108
H. Utilities
1. Westgate Colony Subdivision Petition Sewer
Service (79h & 80th Avenues, 79h Court &
21st Street, North of State Road 60)
Resolutions I and II
(memorandum dated October 6, 2000) 109-131
I. Human Services
None
BK 115 PG 471
BACKUP
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY PAGES
Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners, the
Indian River County Property Appraiser and Tax Collector for
for Uniform Method for the Levy, Collection and Enforcement
of Non Ad Valorem Assessments within the East Gifford Water-
shed Area Municipal Service Benefit Unit
(memorandum dated October 5, 2000) 132-134
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Fran B. Adams
B. Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
C. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
D. Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
E. Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disuosal District
1. Approve Minutes — regular meeting of Sept. 19, 2000
2. Approve Minutes — regular meeting of Oct. 3, 2000
3. Implementation of Groundwater Monitoring and
Remediation Plan for the Gifford Closed Landfill
Site
(memorandum dated October 10, 2000) 135-193
BK 1 15 PG 472
L
BACKUP
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS (cont'd.): PAGES
C. Environmental Control Board
1. Approve Minutes - regular meeting of Aug. 8, 2000
2. Quarterly Report
(memorandum dated October 2, 2000) 194-196
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p.m.
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF OCTOBER 17, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER ................................................. 1
2. INVOCATION.................................................... 1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ......................................... 1
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA ..................................... 1
5.A.1. PRESENTATION OF A FLORIDA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) CHECK FOR NORTH COUNTY
REGIONAL PARK BY REPRESENTATIVE FROM SENATOR PATSY
KURTH'S OFFICE................................................2
5.A.2. RECEIPT OF DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER
SERVICES GRANT - EXHIBIT BUILDINGS AT FAIRGROUNDS ........ 2
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 ..................... 2
7. CONSENT AGENDA .............................................. 3
7.A. Reports.....................................................3
7.B. Approval of Warrants ......................................... 3
7.C. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs ...................... 13
7.D. 2001 Holiday Schedule.......................................14
7.E. Renewal of Class A Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for
the EMS Division of the Department of Emergency Services to Provide
ALS/BLS Pre -Hospital Emergency Medical Services ............... 16
7.F. Arbitrage Rebate and Opinion Services Contract - Public Financial
Management and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe ................... 17
7.G. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement - Pine Lake Mobile Home
Estates, Inc.................................................19
1
Gk 115 PG 474
A
7.H. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement with Quail Run, Inc., a
Manufactured Home Community ............................... 21
7.I. Interlocal Agreement with City of Fellsmere Regarding the Old School
(Harry T. and Harriet Moore Grant) (Fellsmere Little League Park)
(Department of Environmental Protection) ........................ 23
7.J. Appointment to Old (Fellsmere) School Restoration Advisory Group (ad
hoc committee) ............................................. 25
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR THE
NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK (BRAD SMITH & ASSOCIATES) .. 26
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-033 - AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±39
ACRES LOCATED ±650 FEET EAST OF 66TH AVE., ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF 45TH STREET FROM A-1 TO RS -2 - REQUESTED BY CLEMENTE
VALLEJO.......................................................33
9.13.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - CONSIDERATION OF AGENDA POLICY
REGARDING PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - REQUESTS BY FRANK ZORC
AND SIDNEY TURNER TO SPEAK REGARDING FREE SPEECH ....... 45
9.13.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM NANCY B. WOOD OF
COUNTY CLUB POINTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO SPEAK
REGARDING CITY AIRPORT NOISE ............................... 50
9.13.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF BIBBLE IRVIN TO SPEAK ON
BREAKING NEWS ABOUT SAND DREDGING PROJECTS ............. 54
10.A. PROPOSED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY MEETING -
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 769 (PARAMEDICS) ......................... 57
10.B. CALPINE EASTERN CORPORATION - PROPOSED POWER GENERATING
FACILITY (BLUE HERON ENERGY CENTER) LETTER OF INTENT
(INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT ............... 58
I I.G.1. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - SOUTH COUNTY PARK IMPROVEMENTS,
PHASE II - BARTH CONSTRUCTION, INC. (PROJECT 9624) ........... 59
2
BNl15PG475
I I .G.2. ROSELAND AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS - WORK
ORDER NO. 8 - PROFESSIONAL CIVIL SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT -
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC . ...................................... 60
I I.H.1. RESOLUTION NOS. 2000-129 AND 2000-130 - WESTGATE COLONY
SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER SERVICE (79TH & 80TH AVENUES, 79TH
COURT AND 21 ST STREET, NORTH OF SR 60) - RESOLUTIONS I AND II
...............................................................61
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY - AGREEMENT WITH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PROPERTY APPRAISER AND TAX COLLECTOR FOR UNIFORM METHOD
FOR THE LEVY, COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF NON AD
VALOREM ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE EAST GIFFORD WATERSHED
AREA MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT (MSBU) ................ 77
13.A. -E. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS ................................... 78
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ................................ 78
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ............................... 78
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ............................. 79
3
BK 115 PG L; 76
•
October 17, 2000
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, October 17, 2000. Present were Fran B. Adams, Chairman; Caroline D. Ginn,
Vice Chairman; Kenneth R. Macht; Ruth Stanbridge; and John W. Tippin. Also present
were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney; and
Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Jack Isleib, Christian Outreach, Inc., delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice Chairman Ginn led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Adams advised of additional backup for item 9.A.1.
Administrator Chandler requested the addition of 10.B. Calpine Eastern - Proposed
Power Generating Facility - Letter of Intent.
October 17, 2000
1
�J
Vice Chairman Ginn mentioned corrective pages for items 7.G. and 7.H. (Pages 39
and 46).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
above additions to the agenda.
5.A.1. PRESENTATION OF A FLORIDA RECREATION
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) CHECK FOR
NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK BY REPRESENTATIVE FROM
SENATOR PATSY KURTH'S OFFICE
The representative from Senator Kurth's office was not present. Chairman Adams
announced that the County had received a FRDAP grant in the amount of $150,000 for the
North County Regional Park and she had been presented a framed replica of the check by
Kenny Kaye last week.
5.A.2. RECEIPT OF DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND
CONSUMER SERVICES GRANT - EXHIBIT BUILDINGS AT
FAIRGROUNDS
Chairman Adams also announced that the County has received a check in the amount
of $351,900 as a grant from the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services through
the efforts of Representative Charlie Sembler.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -SEPTEMBER 19, 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of September 19, 2000. There were none.
October 17, 2000
Kj
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 19, 2000, as
written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. Reports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
Report of Convictions, September 2000
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 5, 2000:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2000
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of October 2, 2000 to October 5, 2000.
Attachment:
October 17, 2000
3
0
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
October 2-5, 2000, as requested.
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290265
A M BEST COMPANY, INC
2000-10-05
611.95
0290266
ACTION PRINTERS
2000-10-05
877.12
0290267
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
2000-10-05
40.00
0290268
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
2000-10-05
210.00
0290269
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
2000-10-05
2,510.65
0290270
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
2000-10-05
246.30
0290271
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
2000-10-05
709.12
0290272
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2000-10-05
1,707.00
0290273
ABS PUMPS, INC
2000-10-05
8,106.83
0290274
ACTION DIESEL INJECTION
2000-10-05
1,197.33
0290275
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
2000-10-05
65.25
0290276
AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT'L
2000-10-05
159.20
0290277
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2000-10-05
41.40
0290278
A T & T
2000-10-05
79.71
0290279
ASPHALT RECYCLING,INC
2000-10-05
37,303.11
0290280
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
2000-10-05
75.00
0290281
ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO
2000-10-05
1,410.59
0290282
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
2000-10-05
965.54
0290283
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB
2000-10-05
388.70
0290284
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
2000-10-05
60.00
0290285
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
2000-10-05
59.00
0290286
ADVANCED PROCESSING AND
2000-10-05
1,200.00
0290287
A T & T
2000-10-05
57.83
0290288
ANICOM, INC
2000-10-05
- 172.00
0290289
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND
2000-10-05
21,346.37
0290290
ALL CLEAR LOCATING SERVICES
2000-10-05
394.00
0290291
A W K INDUSTRIES INC
2000-10-05
1,272.30
0290292
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
2000-10-05
26.12
0290293
AQUA -MARINE SERVICES INC
2000-10-05
1,000.00
October 17, 2000
0
0 0
•
October 17, 2000
5
•
I
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
NAME
DATE
AMOUNT
NUMBER
0290294
BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO
2000-10-05
1,897.62
0290295
BARTH CONSTRUCTION
2000-10-05
126,104.40
0290296
BARTON, JEFFREY R -CLERK
2000-10-05
2,504.75
0290297
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2000-10-05
3,361.66
0290298
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
2000-10-05
159.00
0290299
SOLING, STAN
2000-10-05
64.22
0290300
BREWER ELECTRIC ENTERPRISE INC
2000-10-05
280.00
0290301
BERGGREN EQUIPMENT CO, INC
2000-10-05
1,011.37
0290302
BARNETT BAIL BONDS
2000-10-05
2,872.00
0290303
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
2000-10-05
715.37
0290304
BRODART CO
2000-10-05
783.57
0290305
BOWKER
2000-10-05
213.47
0290306
BRANDTS & FLETCHERS APPLIANCE
2000-10-05
105.78
0290307
BRIGHTON PUBLICATION, INC
2000-10-05
18.95
0290308
BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE
2000-10-05
300.00
0290309
BELLSOUTH MOBILITY
2000-10-05
84.58
0290310
BETTER COPY CENTER, A
2000-10-05
253.36
0290311
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
2000-10-05
140.41
0290312
BARER, PAMELA A
2000-10-05
150.00
0290313
BENTON EXPRESS INC
2000-10-05
35.02
0290314
BROWN & BROWN INSURANCE
2000-10-05
500.00
0290315
BIO -CHEM RESOURCES
2000-10-05
2,378.58
0290316
BRYANT, JAMES 0 JR
2000-10-05
240.00
0290317
BASEBALL BLUEBOOK, THE
2000-10-05
40.00
0290318
BELLSOUTH
2000-10-05
-374.31
0290319
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
2000-10-05
259.00
0290320
COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO., INC
2000-10-05
129.01
0290321
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
2000-10-05
316.90
0290322
CHLORINATORS, INC
2000-10-05
154.93
0290323
CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC
2000-10-05
355.00
0290324
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
2000-10-05
12,345.27
0290325
COGAR, ROBERT
2000-10-05
9.86
0290326
CLIFF BERRY ENVIRONMENTAL
2000-10-05
217.50
0290327
CALL ONE, INC
2000-10-05
50.00
0290328
CENTRAL FLORIDA LIBRARY
2000-10-05
500.00
0290329
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES
2000-10-05
26,085.00
0290330
CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO
2000-10-05
2,013.40
0290331
CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC
2000-10-05
53.36
0290332
CSR AMERICA, INC.
2000-10-05
2,011.08
0290333
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
2000-10-05
285.00
0290334
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
2000-10-05
6,397.55
0290335
COLUMBIA PROPANE
2000-10-05
12.23
0290336
CHRONICLE BOOKS
2000-10-05
64.10
0290337
FLINT TRADING INC
2000-10-05
9,264.94
0290338
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
2000-10-05
70.22
0290339
DELTA SUPPLY CO
2000-10-05
236.91
October 17, 2000
5
•
I
F_
0
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290340
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
2000 -10 -OS
38.27
0290341
DUN & BRADSTREET
2000-10-05
1,191.50
0290342
DOW, HOWELL, GILMORE,
2000 -10 -OS
11,729.94
0290343
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
2000-10-05
190.79
0290344
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2000-10-05
500.00
0290345
FLORIDA DEPT OF INSURANCE
2000-10-05
60.00
0290346
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
2000-10-05
21.35
0290347
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
2000-10-05
500.00
0290348
DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE
2000-10-05
625.00
0290349
DILLARD, CASSIE
2000-10-05
38.63
0290350
DOWNTOWN VERO BEACH ASSOC.
2000-10-05
2,815.95
0290351
DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC
2000-10-05
130.32
0290352
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
2000-10-05
41,464.45
0290353
DUQUE, PEDRO & PHYLLIS
2000-10-05
19.01
0290354
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
2000-10-05
52.25
0290355
ELLIS K PHELPS AND CO, INC
2000-10-05
162.75
0290356
EDUCATIONAL DIRECTORIES, INC
2000-10-05
180.00
0290357
EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
2000-10-05
386.00
0290358
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES
2000-10-05
187.00
0290359
ELANJICKAL, SOSAMMA & NANCY
2000-10-05
60.84
0290360
FGFOA
2000-10-05
125.00
0290361
FATHER & SON APPLIANCE CO
2000-10-05
220.00
0290362
FEDEX
2000-10-05
37.20
0290363
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO
2000-10-05
7,414.00
0290364
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
2000-10-05
262.38
0290365
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW
2000-10-05
180.00
0290366
FLORIDA DEPT OF LABOR
2000-10-05
25,551.74
0290367
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
2000-10-05
7,097.80
0290368
FLORIDA TODAY/USA TODAY
2000-10-05
78.00
0290369
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
2000-10-05
51.20
0290370
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
2000-10-05
1,096.83
0290371
FLOW -TECHNOLOGY
2000-10-05
181.24
0290372
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
2000-10-05
106,979.00
0290373
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
2000-10-05
80.00
0290374
FLEET MORTGAGE GROUP
2000-10-05
191.20
0290375
FRANKLIN COVEY
2000-10-05
194.00
0290376
FGFOA
2000-10-05
125.00
0290377
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
2000-10-05
59.13
0290378
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
2000-10-05
174.60
0290379
FULLER, APRIL L
2000-10-05
34.77
0290380
GALE GROUP, THE
2000-10-05
998.36
0290381
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
2000-10-05
176.10
0290382
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
2000-10-05
54.46
0290383
GENERAL GMC, TRUCK
2000-10-05
553.21
0290384
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
2000-10-05
120.95
0290385
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-10-05
173.99
October 17, 2000
0
0
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290386
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
2000-10-05
323.98
0290387
GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY
2000-10-05
116.34
0290388
GOLFNET, INC
2000-10-05
1,240.00
0290389
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
2000-10-05
435.00
0290390
GOLDEN GATE TRAILER SALES,LLC
2000-10-05
1,000.00
0290391
GALLAGHER, ARTHUR J & CO
2000-10-05
117,563.00
0290392
HAMMOND & SMITH, P A
2000-10-05
18,050.00
0290393
HILL DONNELLY CORPORATION
2000-10-05
204.10
0290394
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
2000-10-05
139.40
0290395
HACH COMPANY
2000-10-05
134.75
0290396
HTE INC
2000-10-05
6,127.00
0290397
HOLIDAY INN SUNSPREE RESORT
2000-10-05
190.00
0290398
HERITAGE MICROFILM
2000-10-05
2,100.00
0290399
HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
2000-10-05
1,447.70
0290400
HANSON, PETRONELLA
2000-10-05
277.84
0290401
HOLMES, EDWARD
2000-10-05
240.00
0290402
HILTON JACKSONVILLE RIVERFRONT
2000-10-05
1,188.00
0290403
HOLLY, TERRY
2000-10-05
350.00
0290404
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-10-05
69,258.95
0290405
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000-10-05
25.00
0290406
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
2000 -10 -OS
5,074.20
0290407
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
2000-10-05
130.50
0290408
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
2000-10-05
1,622.10
0290409
IRON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
2000-10-05
823.13
0290410
INFO USA MARKETING INC
2000-10-05
8,115.00
0290411
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS
2000-10-05
39.45
0290412
IMPERIAL POLK GENEALOGICAL
2000-10-05
49.00
0290413
IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
2000-10-05
263.05
0290414
JANIE DEAN CHEVROLET, INC
2000-10-05
25.58
0290415
J A SEXAUER INC
2000-10-05
1,607.65
0290416
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
2000-10-05
245.31
0290417
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
2000-10-05
515.31
0290418
JIMMY'S A/C & REFRIGERATION
2000-10-05
112.00
0290419
JEROME, CRAIG P.
2000-10-05
1,500.00
0290420
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
2000-10-05
1,276.00
0290421
KEATING, ROBERT M
2000-10-05
156.47
0290422
KELLY TRACTOR CO
2000-10-05
414.25
0290423
KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
2000-10-05
1,104.66
0290424
HUGHES, KELLY
2000-10-05
19.77
0290425
KENT, GEOFFREY J W & JORIE B
2000-10-05
6.55
0290426
KELLY, CHAD
2000-10-05
4,121.00
0290427
LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
2000-10-05
6,900.00
0290428
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
2000-10-05
2,198.87
0290429
LEWIS, RUTH A
2000-10-05
32.36
0290430
L B SMITH, INC
2000-10-05
540.38
0290431
LFI VERO BEACH, INC
2000-10-05
4,163.07
October 17, 2000
7
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290432
LESCO, INC
2000-10-05
315.11
0290433
LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC
2000-10-05
69.94
0290434
LUCAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
2000-10-05
483.50
0290435
LASALLE, EDWARD & JUDITH
2000-10-05
6.58
0290436
MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY
2000-10-05
19.05
0290437
MARPAN SUPPLY COMPANY, INC
2000-10-05
620.40
0290438
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
2000-10-05
90.00
0290439
MICRO WAREHOUSE
2000 -10 -OS
480.66
0290440
MACMILLAN, DAVID MD PA
2000-10-05
200.00
0290441
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET
2000-10-05
34.60
0290442
MILL -IT CORPORATION
2000 -10 -OS
5,000.00
0290443
MASTERSON, MARION
2000-30-05
17.61
0290444
MAXWELL, KIMBERLY
2000-10-05
23.18
0290445
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
2000-10-05
27.08
0290446
NAGY, BELA
2000-10-05
10.64
0290447
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
2000-10-05
184.32
0290448
NOEL, THOMAS
2000-10-05
77.25
0290449
NEWSTAR MEDIA, INC
2000-10-05
8.00
0290450
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
2000-10-05
2,050.97
0290451
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
2000-10-05
4,392.66
0290452
PAN AMERICAN ENG CO
2000-10-05
240.00
0290453
PARKS RENTAL INC
2000-10-05
218.80
0290454
PETTY CASH
2000-10-05
76.03
0290455
PETTY CASH
2000-10-05
127.47
0290456
PIPPIN TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT,INC
2000-10-05
-228.45
0290457
PETTY CASH
2000-10-05
38.89
0290458
PETTY CASH
2000-10-05
75.24
0290459
PRESS JOURNAL
2000-10-05
122.00
0290460
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
2000-10-05
72.00
0290461
PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF
2000-10-05
377.83
0290462
POWERPLAN
2000-10-05
642.52
0290463
RADIOSHACR
2000-10-05
76.45
0290464
RINGHAVER
2000-10-05
505.09
0290465
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
2000-10-05
542.59
0290466
RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC
2000-10-05
76.00
0290467
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
2000-10-05
5,830.22
0290468
RAYSIDE TRUCK AND TRAILER
2000-10-05
200.00
0290469
R & G SOD FARMS
2000-10-05
480.00
0290470
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
2000-10-05
87.06
0290471
RIA GROUP
2000-10-05
515.04
0290472
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
2000-10-05
64.00
0290473
ROTECH OXYGEN AND MEDICAL
2000-10-05
77.00
0290474
REXEL CONSOLIDATED
2000-10-05
2,875.32
0290475
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
2000-10-05
565.76
0290476
ROMANO, CHRISTINA
2000-10-05
38.63
0290477
RICE, BARBARA
2000-10-05
448.24
October 17, 2000
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290478
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
2000-10-05
138.47
0290479
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
2000-10-05
459.00
0290480
SCOTTY'S, INC
2000-10-05
12.48
0290481
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
2000-10-05
288.87
0290482
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO
2000-10-05
167.70
0290483
SOUTHERN CULVERT, DIV OF
2000-10-05
7,997.91
0290484
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
2000-10-05
439.98
0290485
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
2000-10-05
167.05
0290486
ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
2000-10-05
119.80
0290487
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
2000-10-05
65.00
02904.88
SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR &
2000-10-05
548.98
0290489
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
2000-10-05
343.79
0290490
STEWART TITLE OF INDIAN RIVER
2000-10-05
10,000.00
0290491
SUBWAY STAMP SHOP INC
2000-10-05
66.88
0290492
SKILLPATH SEMINARS
2000-10-05
348.00
0290493
SEXTON, HILDY
2000-10-05
80.00
0290494
SEMINOLE PRECAST, INC
2000-10-05
3,240.00
0290495
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
2000-10-05
252.14
0290496
SEARS
2000-10-05
1,050.35
0290497
• STAMM MANUFACTURING
2000-10-05
380.86,
0290498
SOUTHERN LOCK. AND SUPPLY CO
2000-10-05
47.88
0290499
SECURITYLINK FROM
2000-10-05
82.50
0290500
STANBRIDGE, RUTH
2000-10-05
245.20
0290501
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2000-10-05
400.00
0290502
SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA
2000-10-05
-504.00
0290503
SPHERION CORPORATION
2000-10-05
159.00
0290504
SILVA, VICTOR & RUTH
2000-10-05
9.93
0290505
STEWART & EVANS, P A
2000-10-05
19,109.47
0290506
SEBASTIAN POWER CENTER RENTAL
2000-10-05
60.50
0290507
STEWART, SARAH LYNN
2000-10-05
19.32
0290508
TARMAC AMERICA INC
2000-10-05
450.42
0290509
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2000-10-05
549.02
0290510
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL
2000-10-05
36,161.00
0290511
TOTAL PRINT, INC
2000-10-05
432.00
0290512
TRANS PARTS CENTER OF SOUTH
2000-10-05
308.59
0290513
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP, INC
2000-10-05
254.00
0290514
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
2000-10-05
100.00
0290515
T C BILLING CORPORATION
2000-10-05
10,134.41
0290516
T A P SOD
2000-10-05
6,625.03
0290517
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
2000-10-05
508.68
0290518
TOMMY'S TRANSMISSION AND
2000-10-05
1,160.40
0290519
UNIVERSITY PRODUCTS, INC
2000-10-05
223.65
0290520
U S WIRE -TIE SYSTEMS
2000-10-05
1,221.80
0290521
UTECH 2000 WORLD SUMMIT
2000-10-05
625.00
0290522
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
2000-10-05
3,976.76
0290523
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
2000-10-05
577.32
October 17, 2000
r�.
0
I
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290524
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
2000-10-05
216.53
0290525
VERO BEARING & BOLT
2000-10-05
64.65
0290526
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
2000-10-05
25.00
0290527
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
2000-10-05
316.80
0290528
WAL-MART STORES, INC
2000 -10 -OS
535.74
0290529
WHEELER, GARY C
2000-10-05
6,271.18
0290530
WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
2000-10-05
15.17
0290531
W W GRAINGER, INC
2000-10-05
97.24
0290532
WILLHOFF, PATSY
2000-10-05
130.00
0290533
WILLIAMS, BETTY R, RN
2000-10-05
44.00
0290534
WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC
2000-10-05
2,465.00
0290535
WILSON, MARGARET F
2000-10-05
118.32
0290536
WASTE NEWS
2000-10-05
25.00
0290537
W W GRAINGER INC
2000-10-05
174.93
0290538
XEROX CORPORATION
2000-10-05
1,619.60
0290539
ZIMMERMANN, KARL
2000-10-05
9,410.57
0290540
ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING
2000-10-05
17.25
0290541
FREDERICK, THOMAS A
2000-10-05
109.66
0290542
DEVINE, DON
2000-10-05
69.02
0290543.
GEORGE, VICTORIA
2000-10-05
70.16
0290544'
SABONJOHN, PETER
2000-10-05
44.53
0290545
BRAGG, JO ANN
2000-10-05
9.75
0290546
BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
2000-10-05
55.91
0290547
COBB, WILLIE JAMES
2000-10-05
94.12
0290548
RENNICK, DIANE
2000-10-05
- 25.34
0290549
FENIMORE, ROBERT G
2000-10-05
37.81
0290550
VICKERS, DONALD S & ALICE C
2000-10-05
75.84
0290551
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
2000-10-05
30.02
0290552
JOHNSON, JAMES L
2000-10-05
16.42
0290553
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2000-10-05
37.56
0290554
RENO, THOMAS M
2000-10-05
1.08
0290555
BARTH CONSTRUCTION III INC
2000-10-05
70.67
0290556
SALINAS, NORA M
2000-10-05
3.32
0290557
DEKKER SR, ANTHONY & SANDRA
2000-10-05
49.84
0290558
S R SMITH & SONS
2000-10-05
11.84
0290559
ESTATE OF RETA M CROUTCH
2000-10-05
72.04
02,90560
PROCTOR, RALPH & JACQUELYN
2000-10-05
38.65
0290561
MAKOWICZ, NICK
2000-10-05
23.05
0290562
ATWELL, DR ROBIN & DEBRA
2000-10-05
99.99
0290563
WILLIAMS, CHARLES L
2000-10-05
19.78
0290564
BIRKINS, PARKER
2000-10-05
59.37
0290565
JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS INC
2000-10-05
25.16
0290566
GHO VERO BEACH INC
2000-10-05
76.12
0290567
PRATT, WILLIAM
2000-10-05
44.15
0290568
HARGRAVE, HEATHER J .
2000-10-05
84.52
0290569
ABEL, JAMES
2000-10-05
35.82
October 17, 2000
BN 115 PG 486
10
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290570
KELLER, TINA M
2000-10-05
56.06
0290571
TRAINER, CHRISTINE
2000-10-05
9.78
0290572
LETLOW, WILLIE LEE
2000-10-05
34.43
0290573
DE BULA, BRYAN
2000-10-05
40.16
0290574
GENALDI, VICTORIA
2000-10-05
23.81
0290575
ST LUCIE DEVELOPMENT CORP
2000-10-05
6.98
0290576
HEATH, CHARLES W
2000-10-05
38.76
0290577
BELLA, LAURA & ALDO
2000-10-05
34.61
0290578
MC CORMICK, DONALD
2000-10-05
57.38
0290579
SHADDINGER, ROY K
2000-10-05
74.41
0290580
TREASURE COAST BUILDERS
2000-10-05
72.01
0290581
MANCHESTER, SARAH
2000-10-05
32.95
0290582
PASTORE, PHILLIP
2000-10-05
27.73
0290583
MUSHLIN, NANCY G
2000-10-05
61.30
0290584
CHILDERS, STACEY D
2000-10-05
16.72
0290585
ON ITS WAY
2000-10-05
44.18
0290586
THORNTON, LATRICIA M
2000-10-05
17.19
0290587
WELLINGTON HOMES
2000-10-05
79.64
0290588
HINZMAN, FRANK D
2000-10-05
52.06
0290589
FEDERICO, NANCY A
2000-10-05
33.06
0290590
LA BARRE, ANTHONY H & DONNA L
2000-10-05
33.50
0290591
RIPPLE, JEFF & CHRISTINA
2000-10-05
15.13
0290592
PARULIS, WILLIAM F
2000-10-05
13.70
0290593
ZUCCARO, GRACE
2000-10-05
43.30
0290594
IDLEWYLD CORP
2000-10-05
-338.15
0290595
KOST, JOANNE
2000-10-05
39.82
0290596
MILLER, RAY
2000-10-05
84.06
0290597
RUPPERT, DAVID P
2000-10-05
38.57
0290598
TIPTON, STEVE & WENDY
2000-10-05
7.28
0290599
BENTLEY, BEVERLY
2000-10-05
39.93
0290600
CRITIES, DANA
2000-10-05
26.06
0290601
POLIMINE, VINCENT
2000-10-05
6.89
0290602
DILKS, LELAND J
2000-10-05
78.88
0290603
CONWELL, SULTANDRA
2000-10-05
20.73
0290604
NEMMER, JACAUELINE
2000-10-05
41.37
0290605
GOLFE, JUANITA
2000-10-05
8.52
0290606
CHANNING CORP XXIX
2000-10-05
60.51
0290607
FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR LTD
2000-10-05
63.24
0290608
ROYAL PALM HOMES INC
2000-10-05
35.52
0290609
BEDOLLA, OTHONIEL
2000-10-05
29.29
0290610
THOMAS, ALAN & PAULA
2000-10-05
76.50
0290611
ZBOROWSKI, JOHN
2000-10-05
23.99
0290612
SMITH, KAREN LINDA
2000-10-05
8.63
0290613
GOBLE, CAROL N
2000-10-05
2.99
0290614
OLIVER, DENISE
2000-10-05
56.82
0290615
MAZZARELLA, MICHAEL
2000-10-05
7.99
October 17, 2000
11
•
CHECK
NAME
CHECK
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
AMOUNT
0290616
EGERTON PROPERTIES INC
2000-10-05
13.20
0290617
VAN ANTWERP, SIDNEY
2000-10-05
77.31
0290618
FLORES, FLOR MARIA
2000-10-05
11.56
0290619'
PBS & J ANALYTICAL
2000-10-05
35.19
0290620
MARTIN, SHANNON
2000-10-05
15.22
0290621
GRIMES, SONJA
2000-10-05
53.00
0290622
POWERS, DOREEN C
2000-10-05
10.88
0290623
BAUMGARD, RONALD
2000-10-05
35.18
0290624
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION, INC
2000-10-05
55.97
0290625
COMPHEALTH MEDICAL STAFFING
2000-10-05
61.43
0290626
DARRAH, NANCY
2000-10-05
28.55
0290627
SPAULDING, KENNETH W
2000-10-05
38.37
0290628
MORTIMER, LACRESHA
2000-10-05
42.34
0290629
TROUTMAN, GERLIE
2000-10-05
10.66
0290630
WASHINGTON, ANTHONY
2000-10-05
8.95
0290631
POTTER, CRAIG
2000-10-05
16.62
0290632
JOHNN, RICK
2000-10-05
66.47
0290633
HUGHES, BOBBY & DOROTHY
2000-10-05
8.61
0290634
SLACK, SAMANTHA
2000-10-05
86.56
0290635
AGUILAR, VICKY
2000-10-05
31.37
0290636
ANDERSON, DAVID H
2000-10-05
15.19
0290637
LUBE CONNECTION INC
2000-10-05
31.67
0290638
KOSKEY, DOUGLAS
2000-10-05
13.22
0290639
BURLESON, SAM E
2000-10-05
19.49
0290640
ESTES, BARBARA
2000-10-05
- 40.85
0290641
JENKINS, DEBRA RENEE
2000-10-05
32.91
0290642
ANDERS, JUNE
2000-10-05
35.24
0290643
FITZPATRICK, BABETT
2000-10-05
6.39
0290644
MORGAN, VICTORIA
2000-10-05
37.14
0290645
SEILER JR, FRANK E
2000-10-05
18.20
0290646
SAYER, JAMES C
2000-10-05
62.32
0290647
SEELY, MELISSA & ROBERT
2000-10-05
48.63
0290648
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
2000-10-05
256.69
0290649
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2000-10-05
38.46
0290650
COUNTRYSIDE N MOBILE HOME PARK
2000-10-05
33.77
0290651
KONIECKI, M/M FRANK
2000-10-05
1.31
0290652
MC CLAIN, CHARLOTTE
2000-10-05
28.42
0290653
KIEFER, MIKE E
2000-10-05
17.41
0290654
BUCK, LORI A
2000-10-05
9.90
0290655
JOHNSTON, JOSEPH
2000-10-05
78.39
0290656
ST LUCIE DEVELOPMENT CORP
2000-10-05
70.03
0290657
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
2000-10-05
50.33
0290658
VILLAROSE, DORIS M
2000-10-05
28.23
0290659
POWELL, KRYSTAL
2000-10-05
17.29
0290660
NIESKOSKI, LILLIAN I
2000-10-05
37.81
0290661
HESSEE, MARK
2000-10-05
52.40
October 17, 2000
12
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0290662 DOMAN, DOROTHY S
0290663 LUNN, CHRISTOPHER & TARA
0290664 LYNCH III, JAMES V & INGRID
0290665 PRICE, GLORIA
0290666 COLLINS, KIMBERLY
0290667 RATHBURN, ROBERT
0290668 EMS ENTERPRISES
CHECK CHECK
DATE AMOUNT
2000-10-05
28.47
2000-10-05
57.94
2000-10-05
15.74
2000-10-05
38.83
2000-10-05
31.59
2000-10-05
5.49
2000-10-05
35.95
927,524.60
7. C. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 6, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Paul G. Bangs[, County Attorney q4/
DATE: October 6, 2000
SUBJECT: Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors for
the weeks of August 21, 2000 through September 25, 2000. Listed below are the vendors and the
amount of each court -related cost.
Vendor. Payment for. Amount:
Alan S. Berm, M.D., PA
Suncoast Counseling
Suncoast Counseling
Sheila I. Flinn
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Sheila I. Flinn
Cristi Martin
Indian River MRI
Lynn Park, Esq.
Fred J. Petrilla, Ph.D.
Norman A. Green, PA
Spherion
Hammond & Smith, P.A.
Patricia B. Held
Lynn Park, Esq.
Stevens -Keening Reporting
Brevard County Clerk of Court
Patricia B. Held
October 17, 2000
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Public Defender Costs
Defendant Indigent as to Costs
Transcription
Indigent Dependency Cases (11)
Transcription
State Attorney Costs
Transcription
State Attorney Costs
Transcription
13
2,956.56
537.50
537.50
122.50
150.50
122.50
122.50
94.50
24.50
140.00
42.00
325.50
280.00
71.10
6.00
974.59
207.00
10,450.00
24.50
69.46
246.35
32.00
87.00
'A
Richard Ake, Clerk of Court
State Attorney Costs
5.00
Michael C. Riordan, Psy.D.
Clinical Evaluation
800.00
Elisa LesCamela
Transcription
311.50
Robert J. Brugnoli, Ph.D.
Clinical Evaluation
500.00
Cristi Martin
Transcription
154.00
Sheila I. Flinn
Transcription
171.50
Shirley E. Corbin
Transcription
80.50
Carlos Wells, Esq.
Public Defender Costs
241.79
Avis
Public Defender Costs
90.59
Fairwinds Travel
Public Defender Costs
389.00
James G. Harpring, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts
417.00
Travel By Pegasus
State Attorney Costs
410.00
Fernando G. Miranda, M.D.
Expert Witness
750.00
Norman A. Green, P.A.
Defendant Indigent as to Costs
64.50
Hammond & Smith, PA
Indigent Dependency Cases (19)
18,050.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts — Felony
6,000.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts — Misd.
300.00
James T. Long, Esq.
Public Defender Conflicts — Juv.
600.00
Spherion -
Transcription
' 139.00
Total:
$47,098.44
cc: Honorable Paul B. Kanarek, Chief Judge
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
7.D. 2001 Holidav Schedule
The Board reviewed a memorandum of October 9, 2000:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: Joseph Baird
Acting Personnel Director
1
DATE: October 9, 2000
SUBJECT: 2001 Holiday Schedule
October 17, 2000
14
•
For consideration by the Board of County Commissioners: proposed schedule of holidays for Indian
River County employees for 2001.
Holiday
Coun Observance
New Year's Day
Monday, January 1, 2001
Good Friday
Friday, April 13, 2001
Memorial Day
Monday, May 28, 2001
Independence Day
Wednesday, July 4, 2001
Labor Day
Monday, September 3, 2001
Veteran's Day
Monday, November 12, 2001
Thanksgiving Day
Thursday, November 22, 2001 -
Day after Thanksgiving
Friday, November 23, 2001
Christmas Eve
Monday, December 24, 2001
Christmas Day
Tuesday, December 25, 2001
NOTE: The Supervisor of Elections, Sheriff, and Clerk of Court will observe the schedule above.
In addition to the schedule above, the Tax Collector and Property Appraiser will observe Martin
Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday on Monday, January 15, 2001.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed schedule of 2001 holidays for Indian River County
employees, as recommended in the Memorandum.
October 17, 2000
15
BK 115 PG 49 1
L
ZE. Renewal of Class- A Cerd acate of Public Convenience and
Necessity for the EMS Division of the Devartment of E�mergenC
Services to Provide ALSBLS Pre Hospital EmergenCy Medical
Services
The Board reviewed a memorandum of October 2, 2000:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Douglas M. Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Services
DATE: October 2, 2000
SUBJECT: Approval of Renewal of a Class A Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity for the EMS Division of the Department ofEmergency Services
to Provide ALSBLS Pre hospital Emergency Medical Services
On October 27, 1996, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved an
ALS/BLS Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the EMS Division of the Department
of Emergency Services. This certificate was necessary in order to comply with the Indian River
Code of Laws and Ordinances as specified in Chapter 304: Life Support and Wheelchair Services.
The certificate was approved for a period of two (2) years and will expire on October 27, 2000.
An application for renewal of the certificate has been submitted by the EMS Division of the
Department and it is now before the Board for review and consideration. The EMS Director and the
Medical Director have reviewed the application and certify that all requirements of Chapter 304 of
the County Code have been met which would justify the renewal and issuance of the referenced
certificate.
Section 304.11 of the Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances provides for routine
renewal of the EMS Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity on application by a current
certificate holder. This can be accomplished without a public hearing unless the Board has reason
to believe that the public health, safety, and welfare require a public hearing. Staff submits there
is no reason to hold a public hearing, and absent that requirement, the Board is requested to issue and
renew the certificate routinely.
October 17, 2000
16
r
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrespectfidly recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve and renew the EMS
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Department of Emergency Services,
Division of Emergency Medical Services, for a Class "A" certificate to be effective for a period of
two (2) years from October 27, 2000, to October 27, 2002.
This provider, as with all others, will continue to be subject to the authority of the state Statutes,
administrative rules, and as provided by Chapter 304 of the Indian River Code of Laws and
Ordinances.
ATTACEHH ENTS:
Referenced application
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved and
renewed the EMS Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity for the Department of Emergency Services, Division
of Emergency Medical Services, for a Class "A" certificate to
be effective for a period of two (2) years from October 27,
2000, to October 27, 2002, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
COPY OF CLASS "A" CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.F. Arbitrage Rebate and Opinion Services Contract -Public
Financial Management and Orrick. Herrington & Sutcliffe
The Board reviewed a memorandum of October 11, 2000:
October 17, 2000
17
BK 115 PG 493
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: OCTOBER 11, 2000
SUBJECT: ARBITRAGE REBATE AND OPINION SERVICES CONTRACT
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR, FINANCE DIRECTOR
United States Treasury regulations require the board of county commissioners to rebate all arbitrage
earnings from the investment of county bond proceeds to the Treasury every five years. By
definition, arbitrage is the purchase and sale of the same or a similar security in order to profit by
price discrepancies between markets. For tax-exempt bond purposes, arbitrage is the ability to obtain
tax-exempt proceeds and invest those fiords in higher yielding taxable securities, resulting in a profit
to the county. Arbitrage is the profit earned from investing low yielding tax-exempt bond proceeds
in higher yielding taxable securities.
As the auditor, recorder and custodian of all county funds, the Clerk of the Circuit Court's Finance
Department invests all bond proceeds and records the interest earnings. Annually, the Finance
Department calculates the arbitrage earnings on all county bond issues. To insure compliance with
all Treasury Arbitrage Restriction Regulations, the Clerk of the Circuit Court selects an independent
firm to verify the calculations and to insure that the Finance Department's calculations comply with
the Treasury regulations.
A Request For Proposals for arbitrage rebate and opinion services was mailed to sixteen firms that
the Finance Department identified as having expertise in the calculation of excess arbitrage earnings
and compliance with the applicable Treasury Regulations. Eight firms responded to the Request For
Proposals. After a through review of the proposals, taking into consideration each firm's
qualifications, experience and references, their fee, and their technical approach, a joint venture
proposal from Public Financial Management and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe was determined to
best suit the requirements set forth in the Request For Proposals. A copy of their proposal is on file
in the Clerk to the Board office.
QUESTED ACTION
Request the Honorable Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chair to sign the two enclosed
Letters of Engagement with Public Financial Management and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.
October 17, 2000
18
I
•
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to sign the two Letters of Engagement with Public
Financial Management and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, as
recommended in the Memorandum.
LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. G. Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement - Pine Lake Mobile
Home Estates, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 19, 2000:
DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2000
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P. . ` ,
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S$
PREPARED
& STAFFED- JOYCE H. DAUGHERTY
BY: PROJECT COORDINATO
SUBJECT: DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AND PINE LAKE
MOBILE HOME ESTATES, INC.
BACKGROUND:
PINE LAKE MOBILE HOME ESTATES, INC. is an adults -only mobile home
community located at 2505 Eber Boulevard, in Melbourne, Florida. The community
consists of 200 homes, and the demographics of the park reflect mostly retirees and
"snowbirds". The park has been in continuous operation for 25 years.
October 17, 2000
19
'A
The owner of PINE LAKE MOBILE HOME ESTATES, INC., Ms. Mary Darrell, is the
owner and corporate signee for Pine Lakes Mobile Home Estates, Inc, and desires to
utilize the Central Regional Residual Facility to dispose of residuals from the PINE
LAKE MOBILE HOME ESTATES, INC. wastewater treatment facility. Attached is an
Agreement for Services to be provided by Indian River County Department of Utility
Services for treatment and disposal of residuals.
ANALYSIS:
The County operates and maintains a publicly -owned Residuals Management Facility,
(dewatering facility), at the Central Regional WWTF; Florida Permit Number FLA -
010434 -001, which is capable of accepting domestic wastewater residuals from outside
sources. The facility has been given approval, and is operating under Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit, in compliance with Florida Administrative
Code, (FAC), Chapter 62-640, to properly treat and dispose of domestic wastewater
residuals.
The CUSTOMER (Pine Lake Estates, Inc.), shall provide all transportation of residuals,
and will be charged as prevailing rates as shown on the Schedule of Water and Sewer
Rates, Fees, and Charges, attached to the Agreement, and labeled "Exhibit A".
RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff of The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement as
presented, and authorize the Chairman to execture the same.
\jhd
Attachments (2)
(CLERK'S NOTE: A REPLACEMENT PAGE FOR PAGE 3 OF THE
AGREEMENT WAS DISTRIBUTED PRIOR TO THE MEETING)
October 17, 2000
0
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement with Pine Lake
Mobile Home Estates, Inc., as presented, and authorized the
Chairman to sign same, as recommended in the Memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.H. Domestic WastewaterResidualAgreement with Quail Run. Inc.
a Manufactured Home Community
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 19, 2000:
DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2000
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS; E. ,
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY R J S
PREPARED
& STAFFED JOYCE H. DAUGHERTY
BY: PROJECT COORDINATO
SUBJECT: DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AND QUAIL RUN
INC, A MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY
BACKGROUND:
QUAIL RUN, Inc., is an adults -only manufactured -home community located at 2445
Eber Boulevard, in Melbourne, Florida. The community consists of 200 homes, and the
demographics of the park reflect mostly retirees and "snowbirds". The park has been in
continuous operation for 25 -years.
October 17, 2000
21
j
The owner of QUAIL RUN, Mr. Roger Ryalls, is the owner and corporate signee for
Quail Run, Inc., and desires to utilize the Central Regional Residual Facility to dispose of
residuals from the QUAIL RUN manufactured home park wastewater treatment facility.
Attached is an Agreement for Services to be provided by Indian River County
Department of Utility Services for treatment and disposal of residuals.
ANALYSIS:
The County operates and maintains a publicly -owned Residuals Management Facility,
(dewatering facility), at the Central Regional WWTF; Florida Permit Number FLA -
010434 -001, which is capable of accepting domestic wastewater residuals from outside
sources. The facility has been given approval, and is operating under Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit, in compliance with Florida Administrative
Code, (FAC), Chapter 62-640, to properly treat and dispose of domestic wastewater
residuals.
The CUSTOMER (Quail Run, Inc.), shall provide all transportation of residuals, and will
be charged as prevailing rates as shown on the Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates, Fees,
and Charges, attached to the Agreement, and labeled "Exhibit A".
RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff of The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement as
presented, and authorize the Chairman to execture the same.
\jhd
Attachments (2)
October 17, 2000
22
OK 1 15 PG 4 9
(CLERK'S NOTE: A REPLACEMENT PAGE FOR PAGE 3 OF THE
AGREEMENT WAS DISTRIBUTED PRIOR TO THE MEETING.)
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement with Quail Run, Inc.,
a Manufactured Community, as presented, and authorized the
Chairman to sign same, as recommended in the Memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
71 Interlocal Agreement with City of Fellsmere Regarding the Old
School (Harry T. and Harriet Moore Grant) (Fellsmere Little League
Parks (Department o, f Environmental Protection)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 11, 2000:
To: Board of County Commissioners
Date: October 11, 2000
Subject: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
AND THE CITY OF FELLSMERE REGARDING THE OLD SCHOOL
From: Fran B. Adam4ox
Commissioner
October 17, 2000
23
x
The City Council of the City of Fellsmere during their meeting on October 5, 2000 approved the
attached Interlocal Agreement between Indian River County and the City of Fellsmere. I would
like to request permission for the Board to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the
attached Interlocal Agreement.
With the transfer of the Harry T. and Harriet Moore Grant to Indian River County, the County
has sent to the Bureau of Design and Recreation Services a request for an extension of contract
(LLI #M99048) with a completion date of January 22, 2002. An amended scope of work was
also submitted to the state and is in the process of being routed for approved. I would like to
request that once the extension and amended scope of work is returned that the Chairman be
given permission to sign the documents and return them in a timely manner to the Deparment of
Environmental Protection (DEP).
Attachments: Interlocal Agreement
Letter Dated September 27, 2000
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
Interlocal Agreement with the City of f ellsmere concerning the
historic Fellsmere School and the Harry T. and Harriet Moore
Grant and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
requested.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
October 17, 2000 24
0 0
•
7.1 Appointment to Old Eellsmere) School Restoration Advisory
Group (ad hoc committee)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 11, 2000:
To: Board of County Commissioners
Date: October 11, 2000
Subject: APPOINTMENTS TO OLD SCHOOL
RESTORATION ADVISORY GROUP
From: Fran B. Adams
Chairman cz'-S�'
In order to insure the Save Our Old School (SOOS) interests in the restoration of the old
Fellsmere School, I would like to appoint the following three citizens to the Restoration
Advisory Group:
Joel Tyson
Korky Korker
Barbara Robinson
This will be an ad hoc committee with input in the restoration process
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously confirmed the
Chairman's appointment of Joel Tyson, Korky Korker, and
Barbara Robinson, to the Old (Fellsmere) School Restoration
Advisory Group, as requested.
October 17, 2000
25
•
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE
APPROVAL FOR THE NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK BRAD
SMITH & ASSOCIATES)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of October 9, 2000 using
the overhead projector to display various maps to aid in his presentation:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
`RSbert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP :� m
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: October 9, 2000
SUBJECT: Indian River County's Request for Special Exception Use Approval for the
North County Regional Park
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 17, 2000.
BACKGROUND:
Brad Smith and Associates, Inc. on behalf of Indian River County has submitted an application for
major site plan and special exception use approval for the north county regional park. The subject
October 17, 2000
BK 1 15 PS 5 Q 2 26
0 0
•
LJ
site is located on the north side of CR 512, just west of the Sebastian River Middle School. The
property is owned by the State of Florida and leased by Indian River County for recreational use.
The park will include two swimming pools, a "lazy river" water facility, four (4) baseball fields, and
a future soccer field complex.
The subject property is zoned CON -1, Conservation 1 which allows recreational uses. Parks are
listed as a special exception use in the CON -1 zoning district. Therefore, special exception use
approval is required, and specific land use criteria for parks must be satisfied.
■ Planning and Zoning Commission Action:
At its regular meeting of September 28, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
unanimously (6-0) to recommend approval of the special exception use for the North County Park.
In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the corresponding major site plan
application subject to Board approval of the special exception use request.
The Board of County Commissioners is to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the special
exception use request. Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the land development regulations (LDRs), the
Planning and Zoning Commission is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the
subject site and surrounding area. The county may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary
to mitigate impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
1. Size of Lease Area: 121 acres
Note: The overall St. Sebastian River State Buffer Preserve area is ±6,800 acres located in
Indian River County. There is additional acreage in Brevard County.
2. Zoning Classification: CON -1, Conservation 1 (0 units/acre)
3. Land Use Designation: C-1, Conservation 1 (0 units/acre)
4. Building Area: 14,642 sq. ft.
Note: This includes 9 buildings which will be used for the pool complex, pool pavilion, pool
maintenance, park maintenance, restrooms/concession stand, and picnic -shelters.
October 17, 2000
27
,
5. Open Space: Required: 80%
Provided: 85.25%
Note: As provided for in the LDRs, project open space includes credit for lake area and
counts green open recreation areas, such as soccer and baseball fields, as open space.
6. Off -Street Parking: Required: 255 spaces
Provided: 547 spaces
Note: 128 spaces are paved, and 419 are grassed/stabilized. County LDRs allow up to
50% (127) of the required spaces and all of the overflow spaces to be
grassed/stabilized spaces. The applicant is proposing significant overflow parking
to accommodate parking for infrequent special events.
7. Traffic Circulation: The site will be accessed via a main entrance (full access driveway) on
CR 512. The driveway will be located approximately where the existing `old ranch"
driveway is located, but will be reconfigured to meet county entrance driveway standards.
The driveway will provide for all movements, and will provide outbound right and left -turn
lanes for exiting the site.
This entrance driveway will also provide access to the State Buffer Preserve as well as the
North County Park. It will be paved from CR 512 through the front half of the proposed park
area where the most intense park activity will occur (pools, lazy river, baseball fields). The
paved portion will provide -access to the main parking area located adjacent to the pools and
lazy river. An on-site east/west driveway will connect the main north/south driveway to
parking areas and to the adjacent Middle School site to the east. This inter -connection has
been approved by the School Board, and will provide secondary access for the park site. In
addition, this interconnection will provide access from the park site to a CR 512 traffic signal
at the Middle School's main entrance driveway. That signal can be used for the park's peak
traffic times during special events.
A traffic impact statement has been prepared and approved by the county Traffic Engineering
Division. The results of the statement indicate that no new off-site improvements are
required, and none are proposed. It should be noted that there is a county road project
approved to widen CR 512 to 4 lanes and provide a turn -lane at the park/Buffer Preserve
entrance. The CR 512 roadway widening project is separate from the park project and should
be under construction prior to completion of the Phase I park improvements. As stated
previously, these road improvements are not required for the park project.
October 17, 2000
28
8. Stormwater Management: The stormwater management plan has been reviewed and
approved by the Public Works Department. That plan consists of a series of proposed lakes
(A through E) which will be connected by pipes. The lakes will overflow into a spreader
swale which will discharge into an existing wetland. The applicant will need to obtain a Type
"B" stormwater management permit prior to site plan release.
9. Landscape Plan: The landscape plan is in conformance with the requirements of Chapter
926, and includes a CR 512 landscape buffer and a Type "C" buffer against the east site
boundary.
10. Utilities: The site will be serviced by county water and sewer. These utility provisions have
been approved by the Environmental Health Department and the Department of Utility
Services.
11. Dedication and Improvements: A sidewalk is required along the project's CR 512 project
frontage. This sidewalk segment is guaranteed for future construction as part of the CR 512
road widening project. That guarantee satisfies county sidewalk requirements.
12. Concurrency: The applicant has signed a concurrency acknowledgment agreement which
satisfies the concurrency requirements for site plan approval.
13. Environmental Issues:
Wetlands: The site's 121 acres have been determined to be jurisdictional wetlands.
The wetlands were impacted during previous use of the site as a ranch, and the
wetlands are now semi -improved pasture. The semi -improved pasture area is where
the majority of the development is proposed. Mitigation work is required and
proposed.
The site plan accommodates preservation of approximately 95% of the vegetated
wetland areas. In addition, mitigation work will occur on buffer preserve land
adjacent to the park improvements to provide separation from the park activity and
the Buffer Preserve. Environmental planning staff have no objection to site plan
approval subject to the applicant obtaining county and jurisdictional agency permits
for the wetland impacts.
Uplands: No native upland vegetative community exists on the site. Therefore, no
upland setaside requirements apply.
October 17, 2000
29
14. Specific Land Uses: The following specific land use criteria apply to public parks:
1. No off-street parking or loading areas of buildings and structures shall be located
closer than twenty (20) feet to any property line abutting a residentially designated
district;
Note: All parking is set back 20' or more from site boundaries.
2. Any recreational use equipped with lighting to allow the use of the facility after
sunset shall be designed such that:
a. All lights are shielded from shining into residentially designated adjacent
properties.
Note: There are no immediately adjacent residential properties. However, all lights
will be shielded.
3. Buffering of the project shall be sufficient to not adversely affect adjacent property.
Note: A Type "C" buffer will be provided along the east property line adjacent to the
Middle School property, and is depicted on the site plan. This buffer will be
incorporated into the "lazy river setting" and a large open space area. The buffer is
necessary to screen the lazy river from the Middle School site, otherwise the lazy
river could become an "attractive nuisance". Also, the buffer is needed to provide
a distinct separation of the park from the school site. No other formal buffers are
required, although there will be mitigation work taking place in the preserve adjacent
to the 121 acre park site. This mitigation work will buffer activity areas within the
park site from the rest of the Buffer Preserve. In addition to the buffering, the
applicant is proposing to fence the project perimeters that are not adjacent to the
preserve. The fencing will provide additional site security.
Staff's analysis indicates that all specific land use criteria for parks are satisfied.
15. Phasing: The project will be constructed in 4 phases, with sub -phases within phases 1
and 3. The construction phasing sequence is as follows:
Phase IA Entry Road, Pools and Parking, Driveway Connection to the Middle School,
and Lakes A and E.
Phase IB "Lazy river" Water Facility
October 17, 2000
30
QK115PG506
•
•
Phase 2 Baseball fields, Support Buildings, and Lakes B,C, and D.
Phase 3A Playground and Adjacent Sidewalk.
Phase 3B Railroad Car Exhibit Located at the Entrance.
Phase 3C Boardwalk and Observation Deck at Lake E
Phase 4 Soccer Field with Associated Landscape and Parking Improvements
16. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Buffer Preserve/CON-1
South: Vacant/A-1 -
East: Sebastian River Middle School/A-1
West: Buffer Preserve/CON-1
RECOM NUNDATION:
Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
special exception approval for the requested public park, subject to the following condition:
1. Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall obtain county and jurisdictional
agency permits for the project's wetland impacts.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Plan Graphics (11" x 17" for Board Members)
4. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes (unapproved)
October 17, 2000
31
r
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Frank Coffey, 1335 River Ridge Drive, commented that the lease agreement with
the State of Florida is for 180 acres and 121 of those acres are being used for the swimming
pool and park. He asked about the plan for the 60 acres covered in the Lease Agreement
with the Airmasters Model Airplane Club.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
Chairman Adams responded to Mr. Coffey's question advising that this agenda item
concerns only the site plan for the North County Park; the site plan for the airplane club will
come in at a different time for approval.
Vice Chairman Ginn asked about the location of the soccer fields, and Director
Boling indicated the location on the site map. They will be north and west of the baseball
fields, near the parking area which will serve the soccer fields and playgrounds. There will
be a more detailed site plan for the soccer fields in the future.
Commissioner Stanbridge reminded the Commissioners of the need to move forward
with Phase 3B before the funding source is no longer available. She expected the plan for
that phase to be forthcoming soon.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously granted special
exception approval for the requested public park, subject to the
October 17, 2000
Bit 9 15 PG 508 32
0 0
following condition: prior to site plan release, the applicant
shall obtain county and jurisdictional agency permits for the
project's wetland impacts, as recommended by staff and
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2000-033 -
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ACCOMPANYING
ZONING MAP FOR ±39 ACRES LOCATED ±650 FEET EAST OF 66TH
AVE., ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 45TH STREET FROM A-1 TO RS -2 -
REOUESTED BY CLEMENTE VALLEJO
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
October 2, 2000 using a Power Point® outline.
(CLERK'S NOTE: A COPY OF THE POWER POINT
OUTLINE HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE BACKUP FOR
THE MEETING)
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
DE TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
o ert M.eating, AI ; Com ity Development Director
t
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: John Wachtel; Senior Planner, e Lon -Ran Plannm
Long -Range g
DATE: October 2, 2000
RE: Clemente Vallejo's Request to Rezone ±39 acres from A-1 to RS -2
(RZON 2000-07-0058)
October 17, 2000
33
I
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 17, 2000.
This request is to rezone ±39 acres from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RS -2,
Single -Family Residential District (up to 2 units/acre). Depicted in Figure 1, the subject property
is located approximately 650 feet east of 6e Avenue, and extends from 45h Street (North Gifford
Road) south to 41' Street (South Gifford Road). The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning
necessary to develop the site with single-family residences at a density that is consistent with the
site's comprehensive plan land use designation.
On September 14, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS -
2.
F;cn,TP I.7.nn;nw and Location of the Subject Property
October 17, 2000
34
is 0
---LRS;-3
TRt6
,
r
TR13
A
X
A-1
t
a.
.M N_
PEA
.
mr
3
•S
1�0
TR8
A-1
rr
.rr
rr
r
.19.wh
Gifford
r -
..
TRO
e AL s
i
«
.�i
JL '
2
1
A`
-1
-3`;
AL
'
S
October 17, 2000
34
is 0
•
1-1
In this area of the county, two types of land uses predominate. These are citrus groves and single-
family residences on large lots. The subject property and properties to the north, south and west are
zoned A-1 and consist of citrus groves. The exceptions are one single-family residence abutting the
southwest part of the subject property; two single-family residences on the south side of 45d' Street,
between 66h Avenue and the subject property; and the Lateral "A" Subdivision which is an
Agricultural Planned Development located at the northwest comer of 45`h Street and 66" Avenue.
To the east of the site, land is zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre),
and contains single-family residences on large lots.
The subject property and all surrounding properties are designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1,
on the county future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up
to 3 units/acre. West of 6e Avenue, land is outside the urban service area and is designated AG -1,
Agricultural -1, on the county future land use map. The AG -1 designation permits agricultural uses
and residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/5 acres.
The subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive
by the comprehensive plan. Being a citrus grove, the site does not contain any native uplands.
Jurisdictional wetlands, however, may exist throughout the site, particularly associated with the
site's irrigation furrows. Federal Emergency Management Agency maps indicate that the site is not
within a flood hazard area.
Although the site is within the county's Urban Service Area, neither water nor wastewater lines
extend to the site. If lines were extended to the subject property, the site would be served by the
Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and the North County Water Plant.
The subject property is bounded by both 41SI Street and 45`h Street. Classified as rural major
collectors on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, these segments of 41 s' Street and 45'' Street
are two lane roads with 30 feet of public road right-of-way. These segments are programmed for
expansion to 80 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020.
October 17, 2000
35
BK 1 15 PG 5 1 1
J
,
0
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented.
Specifically, this section will include:
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan;
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate
provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the
community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) require that new
development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and
facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's
LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property
and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency
analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: f39 acres
2. Existing Zoning District: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
3. Proposed Zoning District: RS -2, Single -Family Residential District (up to 2
units/acre)
4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning District:
5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District:
October 17, 2000
7 Single -Family Units
78 Single -Family Units
36
0
Transportation
As part of the concurrency -review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA
reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips
to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as
roadway segments which receive five percent (51/o) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more
project trips, whichever is less.
According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 78 single-family units on the subject property.
Water
With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 78 residential units, resulting
in water consumption at a rate of 78 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 19,500 gallons/day.
This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. If connected to the county potable
water system, development on the subject property would be served by the North County Reverse
Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 1,500,000 gallons/day and
can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed rezoning.
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property
will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 78 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or
19,500 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. If
connected to the county sanitary sewer system, development on the subject property would be served
by the Central County Wastewater Treatment Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of
approximately 1,100,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the
proposed rezoning.
Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The
county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year. With
the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 78 unit residential development would be
anticipated to house approximately 180 people (2.3 X 78). For the subject request to meet the
county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have
enough capacity to accommodate approximately 355 (180 X 1.97) cubic yards/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of over 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a four year capacity,
and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff determined that
October 17, 2000
37
BK 1 15 PG 5 13
the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the
proposed zoning district.
Drainage
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian
River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited
from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the
approved IRFWCD discharge rate.
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property
does not he within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply.
With the most intense use of this site under the proposed zoning district, the maximum area of
impervious surface would be approximately ±23.4 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on
that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD
two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 1,026,206 cubic feet. In order to maintain
the county's adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain approximately
743,066 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is
estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is 80.98 cubic feet/second.
Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site
discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and
requiring retention of the 743,066 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property.
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval
process.
Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most
intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed zoning district
indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained. The following table illustrates the
additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing
surplus park acreage.
PARK INFORMATION
LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population)
Project Demand (Acres)
Surplus Park Acreage
4.0
0.72
1,164
October 17, 2000
38
��
Concurrency Summary
Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities,
including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to
accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district.
Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request.
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan.
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular
applicability for this request are the following objective and policies.
Future Land Use Element Objective 1
Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern
which reduces suburban sprawl. By allowing development of land currently within the urban service
area at the density envisioned by the comprehensive plan, as opposed to expanding the urban service
area, the county can efficiently support growth without creating suburban sprawl or sacrificing
compactness. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective
1.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. In addition, Policy 1.11
states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-1 on the county's future land use
plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district
would limit residential uses to 2 units/acre, which is less than the 3 units/acre permitted by the L-1
designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
October 17, 2000
39
BK115PG515
'A
Consistency Summary
As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all applicable objectives
and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with the
comprehensive plan.
Staff s position is that granting the request to rezone the subject property to RS -2 will result in
development which will be compatible with surrounding areas.
Because a single-family zoning district borders the subject property on the east, the request is for the
continuation of an existing zoning pattern. In fact, staff anticipates that, eventually, land that is
along 66'h Avenue and within the urban service area will be dominated by single-family residential
uses.
With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural zoning on property
rather than changing it when the underlying land use designation increases. This not only reflects
the county's policy of using agricultural zoning as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that
urbanization occurs incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods. At
39 acres in size, the subject property is large enough to buffer itself from the impacts of nearby
agricultural uses.
For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RS -2 zoning would be compatible with development
in the surrounding area.
Being a citrus grove, the subject property does not contain any native upland habitat. Prior to site
development, the applicant must conduct, and County Environmental Planning Staff must approve,
an environmental survey to determine if wetlands exist on the site. Any wetlands determined by that
survey to be on the site are protected by federal, state and local regulations. Consequently, the
proposed rezoning will not have any significant impacts on important environmental resources.
Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with
surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will
have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most
importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for low-density single-family
residential uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
October 17, 2000
M
BK I 15 PG 5 16
0 0
1]
•
Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS -2 by
adopting the attached ordinance.
1. Summary Page
2. Rezoning Application
3. Approved Minutes of the September 14, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4. Rezoning Ordinance
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Claude Smith, 1894 33' Avenue, advised that his family owns property zoned for
agriculture directly to the south of the subject property. Most of the property around this
site is not developed like a subdivision since most of the landowners have one home on their
large parcels. He thought it was a shame to see the subject parcel rezoned because it is
actually a fairly young grove as compared to some of the other older groves, which are no
longer productive. He believed that a lot of the neighbors were not thrilled to have a
development of this size nearby. He inquired how the taxes in the area would be affected.
Chairman Adams advised that many factors determine how property values are
assessed, not just the surrounding property uses. Based on the recent findings of the Value
Adjustment Board, she thought the rezoning would probably not affect the values of the
neighboring properties so long as the use has been consistent.
Commissioner Stanbridge advised that the Commissioners who served on the VAB
were very sympathetic to the agricultural property owners and understood their situation
even within the urban service area.
October 17, 2000
41
I
Mr. Smith then asked if a road was proposed to go through this property from north
Gifford to south Gifford, and Director Keating advised that he has not yet seen a subdivision
plat, but to divide it, the developer would have to install all the necessary urban
improvements, for example: a road, drainage, water and sewer.
Commissioner Stanbridge sympathized and agreed it was hard to see change come,
but the county is growing. She asked Director Keating to tell about the buildout of an RS -2
zoned property.
Director Keating stated that RS -2 zoning requires a minimum 16,000 square foot lot
and to accommodate that, the developer would also have to put in a 60 -foot road. He
estimated the developer would get somewhere between 65 and 70 units on their 39 acres and
that depended on a lot of circumstances.
Commissioner Stanbridge predicted the lot sizes would be consistent with many of
the neighbors.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 2000-033 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the
accompanying Zoning Map for ±3 9 acres located ±650 feet east
of 66`h Avenue, on the south side of 45`h Street, from A-1,
Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RS -2, single-
family residential district (up to 2 units/acre).
October 17, 2000
42
BK 1 15 FG 5 18
REVISED 10/27/2000 m conwr SCRIVEROR-Sr ERROR -_W NUMBERING
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-43.2- 033
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±39 ACRES LOCATED ±650
FEET EAST OF 66TH AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 45TH STREET, FROM A-1,
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), TO RS -2, SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 2 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
ALL OF TRACTS 13, 14, 20, AND 19 EXCEPT THE WEST 195 FEET OF THE SOUTH
225 FEET OF TRACT 19, IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 32
SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST THEREOF, OF INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY
SUBDMSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 2, PAGE 25, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
LESS ANY ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAYS.
Be changed from A-1 to RS -2.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
October 17, 2000
43
BK 6 15 PG 519
I
REVISED 10/27/2000 TO CORRECT SCRIVENJR'S ERROR IN NUMBERING
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 03e- 033
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, on this 17d day of October, 2000.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 0 day of October, 2000, for a
public hearing to be held on the 17th day of October, 2000, at which time it was moved for adoption
by Commissioner Gi nn , seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n , and
adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye
Vice -Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R Macht Aye
Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge _gyp
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: �� CL -a— 6 0r �
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
ATTEST B e
roz Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins 11, Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Roert . Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
October 17, 2000
44
BX 1 15 PG 520
IndviNve Ca Approved I Dale
Admin V(J
Legal
Budge{/ j6
Dept
Risk Mgr.
cd\u\v\j\tz\rancho\rzon ord.wpd
•
County Attorney Bangel advised that he had researched public comment at public
meetings and suggested that the Commissioners may establish content neutral guidelines for
the time, place, and manner of public comment with the goal being to conduct orderly,
efficient meetings. He read a couple of lines from a court opinion from the 11th Federal
Circuit Court of Appeals. (Jones v. Heyman) The County Code already provides that the
presiding officer may recognize persons who wish to address the Commission and, when
recognized, a person shall give his or her name and address and limit remarks to 3 minutes,
unless additional time is granted by the Commission. Regarding the order of business, the
Code states, under public discussion items, as follows: As a general rule, public discussion
items should be limited to matters on which the Commission may take action. The
Commission can strengthen the ordinance or can heighten enforcement and can regulate the
time, place, and manner of public comment.
Vice Chairman Ginn suggested the word "civility" be added to the Code (after order
and decorum) and maybe that would take care of any problems. She did not want to see a
lot of changes. It really had not been a big problem except around election time.
Commissioner Macht agreed.
Commissioner Stanbridge liked the idea of a procedures manual. She had been
complimented on Indian River County's Board of County Commissioners' proceedings by
people who have attended other governments' meetings elsewhere in the state.
Vice Chairman Ginn agreed it is a little awkward for a person to comment on an
agenda item when the agenda is not available until the Thursday before the meeting.
Chairman Adams understood that "order, decorum, and civility" was the direction the
Commissioners wished to take.
October 17, 2000
Commissioner Macht agreed, adding that it is the Chairman's responsibility to run the
meeting. He did not recall any problems in the past 8 years except recent ones. He would
hate to see the public's ability to comment jeopardized. He suggested the Chairman proceed
with a procedures manual and the Commissioners could vote on it.
Chairman Adams advised she would take it from there.
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM -REQUEST FROM NANCY B.
WOOD OF COUNTY CLUB POINTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
TO SPEAK REGARDING CITY AIRPORT NOISE
The Board reviewed a letter of October 9, 2000 and a memorandum of October 11,
2000:
Country Club Pointe Homemmers Association
3007 Calcutta Drive oFFICZ
Vero Beach, Florida 32960`''
October 2000...
HAND DELIVERY—
Dear County Administrator James Chandlers:
As you had requested here is a letter formally making a request to get on the agenda for the next
Commissioners meeting October 17, 2000? My plea is in regard to the constant and ever increasing noise
generated by the city airport on a regular basis both day and night This letter my concern and
hopefully will clarify my position as a county resident .I have been trying to compromise with officials at
the airport (for over a year) and city council (aver 5monft) for some action to create a more livable
environment for property owners in Indian River. I have documentation that my neighborhood (8t others)
has been working on this issue for over a deradeI After checking with John McCoy and then with Stan
Bowling, I observed an area of concern that is affiliated with the City owned and operated General
Aviation Airport The zoning maps indicate that the "noise impact zone" is locked in close pradmity to the
airport, when in fact its noise reaches many, many residents. For me to try and change that it would cost
5500 just for the application If the Commissioners see it 5t I understand they as a board can request a more
accurate update. Aircraft noise affects the county residents and is very detrimental both in regard to
resident's quality of life, our public safety, and the decrease in our property value.
There is a CRtEAT disparity between the 500 or so that make the noise and the 112,000 residents
that are subjected to the noise, the vibration and the safety hazards associated with so much air traffic. Our
October 17, 2000
50
1 15 PG
the Board consider an agenda procedures manual to provide guidelines for everyone and the
parameters desired relative to the public discussion items can be included. She hoped to hear
the Commissioners' comments on this suggestion after hearing from the public.
Frank Zorc, 2044 DeLeon Avenue, submitted a motto concerning "truth" and
postulated that some elected officials get the jitters when the public speaks the truth about
them, especially on television, because they fear it and call it "negative" or "attacks". He
opined that fear pushes them toward controlling and muzzling the public's freedom of
speech. He advised the contents of an article in Florida Today entitled "Is negative negative
if it's positive" which he stated was a good comparison to a major issue in Indian River
County of the "yet -pending (the State) Dodger Deal". Last week, he related that
Commissioner Macht sought Democratic votes saying he favored a vote of the people on the
Dodger Deal, but then gave excuses, such as not enough time and lack of public education,
for not having one. Further, he stated that Commissioner Macht portrayed "truth" as
negative attacks. This Dodger issue is still alive; the Commission can still support a vote on
it and the results would tell the State if our taxpayers support or oppose it. He asked the
Board to support the City of Vero Beach in holding such a vote.
Commissioner Macht wished to respond to Mr. Zorc's assertions because some things
he said were not true. Commissioner Macht stated he had no role as a negotiator with the
Dodgers, had nothing to do with timing or anything of that sort. The negotiations were
handled by County Administrator Chandler, our then -County Attorney and Assistant
Administrator Baird, and the Dodgers required the negotiations be kept confidential. He
was unaware of the progress until reports were made public. When asked, Commissioner
Macht had told people that he did not care whether or not a referendum was held. He did
nothing to prevent it; he was neither a opponent nor an advocate. He thought a referendum
was not appropriate at that time because there was no time to inform the people of specifics.
October 17, 2000
47
B11 1 15 PG 5 2 3
I
Commissioner Macht stated that Mr. Zorc says "the Dodger deal is bad", but gives no
reasons why it's bad. Perhaps the Board failed when the negotiations were settled by not
taking the opportunity to say why it is good and giving more facts to the public
Sid Turner, 8775 20`h Street, read the decision of the Florida Supreme Court
regarding the public's right to be heard when decisions affecting them are being made. He
resented a Commissioner's remarks concerning the ability to manage for years without
experts such as him. He felt compelled to rebut the remark saying that if the Commissioners
would accept public input along with their own judgment, fewer fiascos and more efficient
government might occur. He recounted issues which he felt possibly could have been
alleviated if public input was accepted and heeded by the Commissioners.
Frank Coffey, 1335 River Ridge Drive, expressed his appreciation to the
Commissioners for giving him the opportunity when he wished to speak and express his
opinion. They did not need to agree with him and he did not have to agree with them, but
he was given the opportunity and hoped he had acted in a professional way toward them as
elected officials who make the final decisions. Some decisions are not easy; it is not possible
for everyone to be satisfied all the time. His only question was having to submit a letter of
intent to speak before knowing what is on the agenda. He asked if some accommodation
could be made for the public to comment on agenda items prior to the meeting.
Commissioner Macht stated the Board had never restricted anyone's right to speak,
even outside of the public items.
Commissioner Stanbridge agreed that many times non-public hearing items have been
opened for input and Mr. Coffey has always been very pleasant and nice in his positive and
negative comments.
Commissioner Tippin advised that he has always appreciated and welcomed
constructive criticism.
October 17, 2000
48
45 0
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - CONSIDERATION OF
AGENDA POLICY REGARDING PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS -
REQUESTS BY FRANK ZORC AND SIDNEY TURNER TO SPEAK
REGARDING FREE SPEECH
(CLERK'S NOTE: THIS AGENDA ITEM COMBINED A
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION BY CHAIRMAN ADAMS
ON PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS AND REQUESTS BY
MESSRS. ZORC AND TURNER TO SPEAK ON RELATED
TOPICS.)
The Board reviewed two letters dated October 10, 2000:
8775 20th St. N3
Vero Beach, FL 32966
October 10, 2000
Phone: 562-7270
Office of County Administrator
Indian River County :
Margaret A. Gunter/Executive Secretary j
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Ms. Gunter:
I would like to speak at the next meeting of the County Commission
under Public Discussion Items on October 17th.
Would like to discuss my right to speak before the Commission as
guaranteed by the First Amendment as long as I follow guidelines
prohibiting inflammatory, profane speech etc. Also would like to
request a copy of any new guidelines by the Commission.
October 17, 2000
45
nce ely, h-'
Sidne W. Turner
October 10th. 2000
770-5095 fax /and' Hand Deliver
Dear Ms. Gunter
Please place me on the October 17th. 2000 Commission Public Matters
agenda to discuss Public Rights to Freedom of Speech, and Open Government.
Ank
XC To All concerned Parties
Mike Kaiser Press Journal Writer
Chairman:Adams advised that anyone could speak on this matter. She specified that
she does not wish to limit the ability to speak but wanted to ensure a policy of civility at the
County Commission meetings. She believed that an atmosphere of confrontation or personal
attacks does not show a positive example to peers in government or to young people, and
does not provide an atmosphere in which to seek a solution. She reviewed the historical use
of the public discussion section of the agenda which has been expanded to allow anyone to
comment after requesting to be put on the agenda. She stressed, however, that comments
need to stay issue -oriented. While she believes in the freedom of speech, the Commission's
duty at their meetings is to conduct the business of the County in a public forum in a timely
and professional businesslike manner. She thought televised meetings contribute to the
bolstering of confrontation, but that is not a professional way to conduct business. Other
counties have been surveyed on this topic and the results indicate that most of them set time
limits. Our Code calls for a 3 -minute limit but she believed a time limit was unnecessary,
that the Board needed to hear all sides to the issue. She felt it is her job, as Chairman, to
guarantee a realm for the Commission to operate effectively with public input. She suggested
October 17, 2000
Bil 1 15 PG 5 2 2
airport is extremely busy due to student flight training The recent fatalities have only reinforced our fear
for public safety of the resides of Indian River County. The bulk of the pilots are not trained & licensed
pilots but STUDENTS -an alarming ratio of them that do not speak Pnglish! Which is in fact the global
language of aviation. These students are seen flying illegally low over public schools, churches and other
congested areas. The students practice at ANY time day or night No restrictions are in place. As a property
owner, I OWN 500 feet of my airspace as listed in Federal Regulation 91.119. Also Florida Statutes 70.001
states more about governmental entity (City of Vero Beach) has inordinately burdened an existing use of
real property, my property along with many others. Hopefully the county will look out for its constituents
The city of Vero Beach has appointed an Ad Hoc Committee to discuss the present problems and hopefully
future solutions. Since this affects so many county residents, may I also please request that someone from
the county attend these meetings and stay abreast of the situation? I feel as though the county residents are
not represented. I would be more than happy to come in and speak to you or the Commissioners in advance
of the meeting on the 17*. Just let me know, please.
To port all my concerns into one letter, as you had requested would be an extreme achievement
Please allow me the opportunity to discuss these pressing issues with you. I am always available to talk to
you at one of these all-encompassing phone numbers. Home 778 -4160 -but messages are not always
received by me, my business phone is7784833-I do get ALL these messages, or my cell phone that only
my children have is 532 -1640 -if I answer it `Mobile Mom" you'll know you have reached me. I look
forward to talking to you. Thank you for your time.
My VeryBest'Regari s
cy B. Wood
President
Country Club Pointe Homeowners Association
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
DATE: October 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Nancy Wood Letter
FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICP Aj4
Community Development Director
It is requested that the information provided herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its meeting of October 17, 2000.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
On October 9, 2000, Nancy Wood submitted a letter to County Administrator James Chandler,
requesting to be put on the agenda for the Board of County Commissioners meeting of October 17,
2000.
Although unclear, Ms. Wood's letter seems to indicate that Ms. Wood is requesting that the Board
of County Commissioners direct staff to process a land development regulation (LDR) amendment
to change the airport noise impact zone boundaries depicted on the County's zoning atlas without
Ms. Wood paying a $500.00 LDR amendment application fee.
October 17, 2000
51
r ; R
ANALYSIS:
Staffs position is that the airport noise impact zone boundaries not be changed because:
there is no technical information available to justify a change
a change in the noise impact zone boundary would not affect existing residences
When the County enacted its airport zoning regulations several years ago, the airport noise impact
zone boundaries were established The zone boundaries were set based on federal FAA requirements
for airports, bice the Vero Beach Airport, which have not conducted a Part 150 noise study.
Since the noise impact boundaries were established using acceptable FAA methodology, those
boundaries could be changed only by applying the same methodology or based on the results of a
Part 150 study. Because a Part 150 study has not yet been undertaken for the Vero Beach Airport,
staffs position is that no technical data are available to change the existing noise impact zone
boundaries.
Regardless of the location of the airport noise impact zone boundary, it is important to consider the
regulation effect of the noise impact zone. As adopted, the County's airport zoning provisions,
Section 911.17 of the County's I:.DRs, regulate only new construction within the noise impact zone.
The noise zone boundaries do not affect existing development.
Within noire impact zones, certain uses are permitted, some are allowed with conditions, and some
are prohibited. Among those uses which are allowed with conditions are residential developments.
For residential development within noise impact zones, the conditions are that residential structures
be constructed so that the structures meet established noise level reduction standards (these standards
are met by residential construction throughout the County because of existing building/energy code
requirements), or alternatively (instead of meeting noise level reduction standards) a property owner
may execute an avigation easement to the airport, acknowledging that the airport will continue to
produce noise and not be a nuisance.
As indicated above, there is no technical information which would justify changing the existing Vero
Beach airport noise impact zone boundary. Also, changing the boundary would not have any effect
on existing residences within a noise impact zone. For those reasons, staff recommends that no
action be taken by the Board of County Commissioners regarding the County's airport noise impact
zone boundaries.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that no action be taken on the County's airport noise impact zone boundaries.
October 17, 2000
52
Nancy Wood, 3007 Calcutta Drive, advised that she is president of the Country Club
Pointe Homeowners Association (CCPHA) and her purpose in appearing was to open lines
of communication. She stated that previous CCPHA presidents for a number of years have
written to the City of Vero Beach complaining about the airport noise. She has gone through
the procedure with the City Council and the ad hoc committee, on which she sits, will be
looking for a solution. She urged the Commission to have a representative at the next ad hoc
committee meeting to be held October 27'. She pointed out that even though the airport is
in the city limits, it is surrounded by county property. She was not aware of any
intergovernmental agencies that would be available for more information. Her desire is to
protect the quality of life in Indian River County. She advised that the City has more items
on their agenda (tonight) for the expansion of the airport over the next five years. She
wanted to point out that the "noise impact zone" on the County's zoning map is incorrect and
thought the Board would want to correct that. She pointed out that Section 911.7 of the
zoning ordinance promotes public health, safety, and the general welfare of Indian River
County residents. She raised the issue of safety, citing 3 aircraft fatalities within a 50 -mile
radius of Vero Beach. She stated she could not hear the band at football games. She advised
of being awakened before dawn by aircraft noise and stated that planes fly dangerously low
over her home about every 60 seconds. The Florida real estate law says that she owns 500
feet above her home and she assured the Commissioners the planes are well below the 500
feet. She sees the planes flying over the elementary and other schools, retirement homes,
and not all pilots are trained and licensed, some are students. She pointed out that English
is the global language of aviation and was concerned about the ability of foreign language
speaking students to communicate with the tower. She thought building an alternate landing
strip, suggested by a City of Vero Beach councilman, was a great idea. She was hoping for
a positive productive solution; she thought something could be done which would be logical
and low-cost.
October 17, 2000
53 BK I IS PG 529
I
Commissioner Stanbridge advised that the City of Vero Beach has offered to
participate in the Part 150 noise study which is on-going.
Chairman Adams inquired if the Part 150 study has been undertaken, and Ms. Wood
advised that City Councilman Warren Winchester moved to go ahead with the 150 study and
the City Council has authority over the FAA to define the terms of the study.
Ms. Wood pointed out the necessity of insuring we get the correct information on that
150 study. She hoped seeking a solution to the noise problem would continue to move
forward.
Vice Chairman Ginn commented that she goes to every football game and hardly
notices a plane in the sky, and Commissioner Stanbridge concurred that she had not either.
Ms. Wood advised that it was mostly the trainer flights and the two -engine planes that
she has noticed at the games she has attended.
9.B.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF BIBBLE
IRVIN TO SPEAK ON BREAKING NEWS ABOUT SAND DREDGING
PROJECTS
The Board reviewed a letter of October 17, 2000:
October 17, 2000
BK 115 PG 530
54
-I
Bibble Irvin brought and displayed with the overhead projector some very recent
photographs to show the beach erosion occurring due to the usual October weather. He
described the erosion at Conn Beach as not too severe. He disagreed with Coastal Engineer
Jeff Tabar who had said that escarpments that occur on beaches which have had sand
dredging were the same as on beaches which have not had sand dredging. On this issue, he
felt the Commissioners had been misled. He displayed a photograph of Wabasso Beach and
estimated the escarpment as a back -breaking 12 -feet tall. That is a escarpment. He
explained that escarpments are the number one phenomenon to occur after sand dredging.
Fortunately, Wabasso Beach has sand placement, not sand dredging. If sand dredging had
been done in this area, he emphasized that the escarpment would have been to the ocean's
edge, and walking on the beach would be impossible. He had learned that the escarpment
in Ft. Pierce was 6-7 feet all the way down their beach. The next photograph was also of
Wabasso Beach and he pointed out where the sand placement had not occurred and described
how it has been naturally placed for many years. The escarpment was only about 3 or 4 feet
because the sand had not been built out at that location. He believed that retreating from the
shore was the right thing to do as he pointed out in a 1968 photo that homes were built right
at the bluff line at 5ummerplace. He then showed a photograph of the same area and
indicated the difference where the seawall had been constructed. His last photograph was
of Humiston Beach in 1957 and the ocean had eroded the sand behind the boardwalk as it
does now, because the boardwalk was built on the immediate bluff. Mr. Tippin had
informed him that the Ft. Pierce project is completely different from what is proposed for
Vero Beach, but Mr. Irvin cautioned that we will not have the protection of the jetties which
is why the Corps of Engineers has predicted that we will have 10-12 foot escarpments. On
this last photograph he had drawn a "little girl", a turtle, and a ladder to show what will
October 17, 2000
55 BK 1 15 PG 531
I
happen with ahigh escarpment. He talked about the beauty of the shells he has recently
collected from the beaches which are really a fabulous resource that could be covered up by
sand dredging. He had heard that West Palm Beach's sand dredging project has been put on
hold because one of the funding sources has been removed. He hoped that the
Commissioners were beginning to realize from the photographs that the beaches have not
changed much over the years. He thought a referendum would be fair but the most important
point would be to inform people that the escarpments will occur if sand dredging is done.
He wanted to take his comments to the Beach Advisory Committee, but the meetings have
been canceled for the past six months. He also thought Vice Chairman Ginn's request for
a workshop has not materialized. He felt the Commissioners have been misled because the
Beach Committee is not meeting regularly in order to present information to the Board. He
wished things could begin to move in that direction. He advised this would be one of the last
times he would be appearing before the Board. He thought the information he has given
them should be given credibility. He thought the Board should reconsider their position on
sand dredging, because it would really create havoc on the beaches. The main thing to
remember is that the beaches are not really changing nearly as much as people say they are.
Commissioner Macht advised that he had learned a lot from the information Mr. Irvin
has been presenting to the Board and he has changed his mind on certain aspects of it.
Vice Chairman Ginn believed that escarpments do occur naturally and that the PEP
reef has been successful. The homes at Summerplace were built on a bluff and the bluff has
eroded. She called the "breaking news" the Heinz Center Report which was commissioned
by FEMA. The report was published in April 2000; she is reading it and is in the middle of
the 5' chapter. She offered to loan this latest work on erosion to Mr. Irvin when she finished
it. She wanted Mr. Irvin to know that the Commissioners are listening to him, but they are
also hearing the fears of beachfront homeowners.
October 17, 2000
BK 1 15 P6 532 56
is 0
Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar declined when Chairman Adams asked if he wished to
respond to Mr. Irvin's remarks.
Chairman Adams advised Mr. Irvin he was welcome to come back after he has read
the Heinz report if he wished to do so.
(CLERK'S NOTE: AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PREVIOUS ITEM,
CHAIRMAN ADAMS CALLED A BRIEF RECESS AT 10:20 A.M.
CHAIRMAN ADAMS RECONVENED THE MEETING AT 10:26 A.M.
WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT.)
10.A. PROPOSED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY
MEETING - TEAMSTERS LOCAL 769 (PARAMEDICS)
Administrator Chandler reviewed a Memorandum of October 11, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: James E. Chandler, County Administratorpf'L
DATE: October 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Proposed Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting
Teamster Local Union No. 769 has been recognized by the Public Employee Relations
Commission, effective October 1, 2000, as the new bargaining agent for the Emergency Services
Department medical rescue personnel. Bargaining for a new contract was initiated at a meeting
on October 5, 2000.
At the conclusion of the Commission meeting Tuesday, October 17`h, if convenient for
the Board, I would request a short collective bargaining strategy meeting.
October 17, 2000
57 BK 1 15 PG 5 3 3
There was CONSENSUS to hold the collective bargaining strategy meeting in
Conference Room B following adjournment of the Board of County Commissioners'
meeting.
10A CALPINE EASTERN CORPORATION - PROPOSED
POWER GENERATING FACILITY (BLUE HERON ENERGY
CENTER) LETTER OF INTENT (INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER
CONTROL DISTRICT
Administrator Chandler reviewed a Memorandum of October 13, 2000:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: ,-%nes EChandl Cof unty Administrator
DATE: October 13, 2000
SUBJECT: Calpine Eastern — Proposed Power Generating Facility
Letter of Intent
As the Board is aware, Calpine Eastern has proposed construction of a power generating
facility, referred to as the Blue Heron Energy Center. Is
The County has and continues to work with Calpine on the many considerations and
requirements necessary for processing such a project. One such requirement is the need by
Calpine for a water source for the plant. In that regard, the County and the Indian River Farms
Water Control District are working together to address that need.
At this time Calpine is preparing to submit a Site Certification Application to the State
and requires a Letter of Intent regarding the water source. Attached is the Letter of Intent
approved by the District Board at its meeting of October 12, 2000.
I recommend that the Board approve a letter in the same form for the Chairman's
signature.
October 17, 2000
BK 1 15 PG 5 3 4 58
MOTION WAS- MADE by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, to approve staffs
recommendation.
Under discussion, Commissioner Stanbridge advised that she had been present at the
meeting of the Indian River Farms Water Control District when they passed this item on their
agenda. It was felt that the combinations of the different waters is something that we will
be getting into very quickly and that this is the type of intent letter that we could provide to
Calpine as they go forth.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
COPY OF SIGNED LETTER OF INTENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.1. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - SOUTH COUNTY PARK
IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II - BARTH CONSTRUCTION. INC.
(PROJECT 96241
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 4, 2000:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works DirectoYmvezments,
FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engi
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 for South County Park Phase 11
IRC Project No. 9624
DATE: October 4, 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDMONS
Construction of thC above mentioned project is underway. During the construction, issues came -up
that required modifications to the contract. Also, the Notice to Proceed was issued on June 21, 2000,
however, the Building Permit was not issued until August 7, 2000.
October 17, 2000
59
•
J
The item shown on the Change Order is as follows:
Item No. 1: Extension of Time by 25 Days from December 22, 2000 to January 19, 2000
Staff recommends approval of the attached Change Order No. 1 in the amount -of 25 days. This
amount will be added to the current contract time of 180 days. This will result in a new contract of
205 days.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to execute Change Order No. 1, as recommended in
the memorandum.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.2. ROSELAND AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS -
WORK ORDER NO.8 - PROFESSIONAL CIVIL SERVICES MASTER
AGREEMENT - CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 4, 2000:
TO:
James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH:
James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directo*ork
FROM:
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engin
SUBJECT:
Roseland Area Stormwater Improvementsrder No. 8 to the
Professional Civil Services Master Agreement between Carter Associates,
Inc. and Indian River County Florida
DATE:
October 4, 2000
ft
On August 4, 1998, at their regular meeting, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the
Chairman to execute the Professional Civil Services Master Agreement, between Carter Associates,
Inc. and Indian River County, for Stormwater Management Improvements. Attached is Work Order
No. 8 for final design, permitting, construction plan preparation and related services for the east
Roseland Area Stormwater Improvements. In addition, Carter Associates, Inc. will provide technical
October 17, 2000
60
BKi65PG56
0
0
assistance to the County in their preparation of a St. John's River Water Management District Cost
Share Agreement for this project. The cost of the work is $33,180.00. The Public Works
Department is currently negotiating land acquisition from two property owners, Mark Hansen and
Robert Denton, for stormwater treatment ponds in this area.
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute the
attached Work Order No. 8.
Funding in the amount of $33,180.00 to be from account no. 315-243-538-068.11. Grants for
construction in the amount of $185,000 have been received from the St. John's River Water
Management District.
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED
BY Commissioner Tippin, to approve staff's recommendation.
Commissioner Stanbridge mentioned that this conceptual plan will be taken for
discussion to the Roseland Property Owners Association.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
WORK ORDER NO. 8 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.1. RESOLUTION NOS. 2000-129 AND 2000-130 - WESTGATE
COLONY SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER SERVICE (79TH & 80TH
AVENUES, 79TH COURT AND 21ST STREET, NORTH OF SR 60) -
RESOLUTIONS I AND II
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 6, 2000:
October 17, 2000
61
BK 115 PG 537
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2000
TO: JAMES &CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R HUBBS, P.
DIRECTOR OF UTIL
PREPARED JAMES D.CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASS NT PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF ITY SERVICES
WESTGATE COLONY SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER
SERVICE (79TH& 80M AVENUES, 79THCOURT& 21ST
STREET, NORTH OF STATE ROAD 60)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -98 -k9 -CS
RESOLUTIONS I AND H
BACKGROUND
On November 10, 1998, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
unanimously authorized staff to proceed with the design engineering necessary to
proceed with the above project. The design has been substantially completed by the
Department of Utility Services' staff. We are now ready to begin the assessment process
associated with this project (See Agenda Item and minutes of the Nov. 10, 98 meeting
Attachment 1). -
ANALYSIS
The Westgate Colony subdivision consists of 79 lots (72 parcel ID's). Eight of the
property Owners own 1.5 to 2 platted lots. There are 18 non owner occupied homes
(many are rentals), and there are five vacant lots. The 44 signatures on the petition
represents ownership of 47 lots, which is 690/6 of the subdivision's 68 homes (59% of the
79 lots and 61 % of the total square footage to be assessed).
The copy ofthe petitioner's letter dated March 23,(Attachment 2)1998 explains several
concerns, among which are:
1. Many of the homes are experiencing problems with their septic systems.
2. Three of the property owners have had to replace their septic systems, with costly,
unattractive, elevated, mounded above -ground level systems.
3. The negative effect of such above -ground systems on their property values.
October 17, 2000
OK 1 15 PG 538 62
0 0
•
Prior Assessment History
Typical lot sizes are 0.21 acre and are "undersized" as defined in Indian River County's
Comprehensive Plan. This subdivision received County water service in the Phase III
Water Expansion Project. The final assessment for that project was approved by the
Board of County Commissioners on August 10, 1994. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of
the water assessments have been paid in full. (See schedule of parcels, lot sizes, and map,
which displays the area to benefit from the assessment project, Attachment 3).
Proposed Assessment
On December 13, 1999, staff held an informational meeting with 39 property owners
attending. The meeting included an overview of the project and an explanation of gravity
versus low-pressure force main (grinder pump station) systems, advantages and
disadvantages of each. The owners agreed with staffs proposal of a low-pressure force
main, with each owner owning, maintaining and operating their own grinder pump
station, with as estimated cost of $ 4,100.00 installed. Another meeting was held on
September 11, 2000 to consider 3 options, which include a Gravity System and to obtain
input from the_ owners. An easement across property north of Westgate Colony to a
county lift station, has now been offered which would make the Gravity Sewer system
feasible. The proposed easement allows design and routing of the wastewater collection
northerly, and east to an existing lift station, located northeast of the subdivision. The
low pressure force main project design routed the system easterly along the north side of
State Road 60 and north to the same existing lift station. There were 29 owners attending
the September 11, 2000 meeting and 6 responded by telephone. 17 owners signed
recommending a gravity sewer system. 4 owners signed preferring the low pressure force
main option. Staff is now recommending and proposing installation of a gravity sewage
collection system.
Typical lot sizes are 02149 acre (9,360 average square feet), with a few homes on 1.5 to
2 lots and there are five residential parcels, which are greater than 0.50 acre (21,780
square feet approximate) in size. In an effort to soften or equalize these disproportionate
size parcels, staff proposes a maximum assessment not greater than 18,720 square feet
which is that of 2 typical 72 ft x 130 ft lots (0.43 acre). This will affect seven parcels.
The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project. Attached are
Resolutions I and H for the assessment project. The total estimated cost to be assessed is
$ 542,400.00 The estimated cost per square foot is 0.701607 (rounded).(See estimated
project cost -Attachments 4 & 5 & assessment roll). The actual assessed cost as with any
such project will be determined based on actual competitive bid prices.
This project is to be funded through the assessment of property owners along the
proposed sewer line route. In the interim, financing will be through the Assessment Fund
(473), account number 473-000-169-371.00. If needed, inter -fund borrowing will be
available from the capacity fee fund 472.
October 17, 2000
63
e
•
I
0
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2000-129 providing for Westgate Colony
Subdivision petition sewer service (791h and 80' Avenues, 79th
Court and 21St Street north of SR 60); providing the total
estimated cost, method of payment of assessments, number of
annual installments, and legal description of the area specifically
served.
Providing (First Reso.) 10/00(reso/westgate)8WDC
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 129
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
WESTGATE COLONY SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER SERVICE (79"'
AND 80'h AVENUES, 79`h COURT AND 21" STREET NORTH OF STATE
ROAD 60); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS,
AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined
that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the
county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
properties to be serviced by a gravity sewer system in Westgate Colony Subdivision (79'" and
80'" Avenues, 7e Court and 2114 Street north of State Road 60), hereinafter referred to as
Project No. US -98 -19 -CS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a gravity sewer system shall be installed to benefit
72 parcels in Westgage Colony Subdivision, (79th and 801" Avenues, 79'" Court and 21111
Street north of State Road 60) and that the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian
River County.
2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $542,400.00 or $0.701607 per square foot to be
paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the
Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands
adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially
benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special
assessments.
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.701607 per square foot shall be assessed against
each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised
or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public hearing, at the
same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code. _.
October 17, 2000
BK 1 15 PG 5 4 0
ZA
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 129
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days
after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special
assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not
paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal
plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal
not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until
paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the project is
completed.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to
be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed
improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in
connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department
shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be
published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing as
required by Section 206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Gi nn , and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner Stanbri doe and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 17th day
of October, 2000.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Cl
Deputy Clerk
October 17, 2000
M
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By. a (,fKj r6xnt.Ci
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
NDIANRIVERCO.
APPRNED
A E
UTILrr1ES
DIRECTOR
1
SUDGET
LEGAL
RISK MANAGER
•
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted -
Resolution No. 2000-130 setting a time and place at which the
owners of properties located in Westgate Colony Subdivision
petition sewer service & 9th and 801h Avenues, 791h Court and
215E Street north of SR 60) and other interested persons, may
appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard
as to the propriety and advisability of constructing the gravity
sewer system, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of
payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially
assessed against each property benefitted thereby.
Time and Place (Second Reso.) 10/00(reso/westgate)MIDC
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-130
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME
AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN
WESTGATE COLONY SUBDIVISION PETITION SEWER SERVICE (79 -
AND 8e AVENUES, 79"' COURT AND 21" STREET NORTH OF STATE
ROAD 60) AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE
PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE GRAVITY
SEWER SYSTEM, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF
PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE
SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED
THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 2000-129 'determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens
of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a gravity sewer system be installed to serve 72 parcels located in
Westgate Colony Subdivision (79th and 801" Avenues, 79'h Court and 21" Street north of State
Road 60); and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect
thereto shall be $0.701607 per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be
completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
October 17, 2000
t
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-130
WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of
County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County
Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County
Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, at which
time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may
appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved
and the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the
assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special
assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment
plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for
said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of
Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the
Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week
prior to the date of the hearing.
4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each
property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place,
which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at
his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by -Commissioner Ginn , and the motion
was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dae , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Fran B. Adams
Aye
Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this it day
of October, 2000.
Att\e . Barton. Cies('
Deputy Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
October 17, 2000
67
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By�:� - 1(� (?KQa110
Fr -an B. Adams, Chairman
IAN
DAT
s o0
MET 7 IV—R00
3
•
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00002 0010 00001.0
SQ. FT. 9,344 ASSESSMENT
6,555.82
OWNER
PLATE, MARK & THOMAS E & ROSEMARY B.
& SHIELDS, PAMELA & ELIZABETH
2106 79TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1363
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 1 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0010 00002.0
SQ. FT. 9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
OWNER
IACAMPO, JOSEPH
MAIL
1345 RANG DOUBLE
VILLE DES LAURENTIDES
QUEBEC CANADA JOR ICO
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 2 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
PROPERTY (2116 79TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0010 00003.0
SQ. FT, 9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
OWNER
WITKOWSKI, LINDA S
2126 79TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1363
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 3 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0010 00004.0
SQ. FT. 9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
OWNER
OWENS, JIMMY O & HELEN
,
2136 79TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1363
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 4 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0010 00005.0
SQ. FT. 9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
OWNER
CASON, E R
MAIL
2001 SE GIFFEN
PORT ST LUCIE, FL 34952
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 5 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
PROPERTY ( 2146 79TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0010 00006.0
SQ. FT. 9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
OWNER
FELDNER, PAUL J & JOAN M
MAIL
9735 FLEMING GRANT RD
SEBASTIAN, FL 32976
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 6 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
PROPERTY
( 2156 79TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0010 00007.0
SQ. FT. 9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
OWNER
ROBERTSON, CLYDE D & LOIS A
MAIL
5865 23RD ST.
VERO BEACH, FL 32966
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 7 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
PROPERTY
( 2166 79TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0010 00008.0
SQ. FT. 9,344 ASSESSMENT
6,555.82
OWNER
ADAMS, JESSICA & HEIDI
2176 79TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1363
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 8 BLK 1 PBI 4-94
October 17, 2000
0
PARCEL # 0133 38 00002 0020 00001.0 SQ. FT. 9,338 ASSESSMENT 6,551.61
OWNER SINCENNES, LUCIEN & JO ANN
MAIL 5 WESTDALE AVE
NEPEAN,ONTARIO, CANADA KEH5JS PBI 4-94
LEGAL WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 1 BLK 2 PBI 4-94
PROPERTY ( 2105 79TH AVE )
OWNER GRIFFIN, J C & BERNICE
MAIL 8260 8TH ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32968-9617 PBI 4-94
LEGAL WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 2 BLK 2 PBI 494
PROPERTY (2115 79TH AVE )
OWNER
DOWNEY, ERLE
2125 79TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32966
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 3 BLK 2 PBI 494
PARCEL #
OWNER
0133 38 00002 0020 00004.0 SQ. FT. 9,210 ASSESSMENT
THOMAS, PAUL E & MARGARET MARY &
6,461.80
LUKE, PRINCESSA C.& MORROW, DONALD M.
2135 79TH AVE
'
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1364
PBI 494
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 4 BLK 2 PBI 494
PARCEL #
OWNER
0133 38 00002 0020 00005.0
FORESMAN, RONALD L
SQ. FT. 9,210 ASSESSMENT
6,461.80
2145 79TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1364
PBI 494
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 5 BLK 2 PBI 494
PARCEL #
OWNER
0133 38 00002 0020 00006.0
CORBEIL, PAMELA L.
SQ. FT. 9,210 ASSESSMENT
6,461.80
MAIL
4166 SOUTH SHORE DR.
CATAWISSA, MO. 63015
PBI 494
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 6 BLK 2 PBI 494
PROPERTY
(2155 79TH AVE)
OWNER TASCON, MARCO A & RUBY Y V „JJC`,`'MCIV 1 6,461.80
2165 79TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1364 PBI 494
LEGAL WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 7 BLK 2 PBI 494
PARCEL # 0133 38 00002 0020 00008.0 SQ. FT. 9,337 ASSESSMENT 6,550.91
OWNER BOLAND, WILLIAM C & CAROLYN T
2175 79TH AVE
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1364 PBI 494
LEGAL WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 8 BLK 2 PBI 494
October 17, 2000
69 BK 1 15 PG
•
'A
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0030 00002.0 SQ. FT. 7,238 ASSESSMENT
5,078.23
DAVIS, FRANK S & ERMA R & NUNEMAKER,
OWNER
D & DAVIS. FRANK S JR & SANDRA W.
GEORGE R & CAROL
MAIL
275 TOWER DR LESS STATE
DANVILLE, PA 17821-8003 PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 2 BLK 3, RD RNVAY
PROPERTY (2016 79TH AVE) VACANT LOT+C134+C150
9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00002 0030 00003.0 SQ. FT.
DAVIS, FRANK S & ERMA R & NUNEMAKER,
OWNER
D & DAVIS, FRANK S JR & SANDRA W
MAIL
GEORGE R & CAROL
275 TOWER DR LESS STATE
DANVILLE, PA 17821-8003 PSI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 3 BLK 3. RD RIWAY
PROPERTY (2026 79TH AVE) VACANT LOT
SQ. FT. 9,216 ASSESSMENT
8,466.01
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00002 0030 00004.0
OWNER
CHILDERS, KELLY L. _
2036 79TH AV PBI 4-94
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1361
LEGAL WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 4 BLK 3 ,
16 ASSESSMENT
.6,466.01
PARE #
0 0005.0
TRACY W L &BALL, TERRY
OWN
SCARBOROUGH,
2046 79TH AV PBI 4-94
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1361
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 5 BLK 3,
9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
PARCEL # 0133 38 00002 0030 00006.0 SQ. FT.
OWNER
JONES, BRYAN E.
2056 79TH AV PBI 494
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1361
LEGAL E COLONY SUB LOT 6 BLK 3.
WESTGATE
SQ. FT. 9,216 ASSESSMENT
6,466.01
PARCEL
# 01 33 38 00002 0030 00007.0
OWNER
RICKLI, GERALDINE LINN
2066 79TH AV PBI 494
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1361
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 7 BLK 3,
9,344 ASSESSMENT
6,555.82
PARCEL # 0133 38 00002 0030 00008.0 Q. FT.
OWNER
SORENSEN, SUE (LE)
2076 79TH AV PBI 494
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1361
LEGAL WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 8 BLK 3 ,
SQ. FT. 16,576 ASSESSMENT
11,629.84
PARCEL
# 01 33 38 00002 0040 00002.0
OWNER WHITE, JERRY VON
MAIL
3050 EDGEWOOD DR, PBI 494
PALM BAY, FL 32905
BLK 4 LOT 2 LESS RD RNV & LOT 3
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
PROPERTY (2025 79TH AVE)
October 17, 2000
70
0 0
0
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00002 0040 00004.0
SQ. FT.
9,211 ASSESSMENT
6,462.51
OWNER
EVERETT, DAVID L & DOROTHY B
MAIL
PO BOX 194
FELLSMERE, FL 32948-0194
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 4
LOT 4
PROPERTY
( 2035 79TH Ave)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0040 00005.0
SQ. FT.
9,211 ASSESSMENT
6,462.51
OWNER
HOLSTEIN, JERRY G
MAIL
H C 75 BOX 5
BENTREE, WV 25018-9701
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 4
LOT 5
PROPERTY
( 2045 79TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0040 00006.0
SQ. FT.
9,211 ASSESSMENT
6,462.51
OWNER
WILEY, JAMES N & BETTY J
MAIL
4711 HUMPHREY RD
GREAT VALLEY, NY 14741-9641
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 4
LOT 6
PROPERTY
( 2055 79TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0040 00007.0
SQ. FT.
9,211 ASSESSMENT
6,462.51
OWNER
KUNTZ, MARY & JONES, BERNICE M.
+
2065 79TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32967-1362
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 4
LOT 7
PARCEL #
0133 38 00002 0040 00008.0
SQ. FT.
9,338 ASSESSMENT
6,551.61
OWNER
TORLUCCI, THELMA
2075 79TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1362
PBI 4-94
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 4
LOT 8
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0001 00000.1
SQ. FT.
7,200 ASSESSMENT
5,051.57
OWNER
MINCK, JOHN M & MARY ANN
7946 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1323
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
UNIT 2
E 72 FT OF S 100 FT OF
TRACT 1 AS R BK 79 PP 361 (OR BK 476 PP 743 )
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0001 00000.2
SQ. FT.
7,200 ASSESSMENT
5,051.57
OWNER
KEENEY, MICHAEL V.
7956 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1325
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
UNIT 2
W72 FT OF S 100 FT OF
TRACT 1 AS R BK 82 PP 529(OR BK 505 PP 780 )
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00003 0010 00001.0
SQ. FT.
9,750 ASSESSMENT
6,840.67
OWNER
GRAY, CHARLES G.
7985 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-5165
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 1
LOT 1
October 17, 2000
71 _
BK 1 15 PG 547
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0010 00002.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
REITZ, ROBERT E & STEPHANIE
KAREN
2066 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1366
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 1
LOT 2
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0010 00003.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
CHAMBERLAIN, RONALD C. & BETTE
2056 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1366
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 1
LOT 3
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0010 00004.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
MORGAN, JUDY
2046 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1366
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 1
LOT 4
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0010 00005.0
SQ_. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
REDDEN, PAULA
2036 BOTH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1366
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 1
LOT 5
+
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0010 00006.0
SQ. FT.
17,537 ASSESSMENT
12,304.09
OWNER
TREGO, LARRY & KAREN
2035 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1366
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 1
LOT 6 & LOT 7 LESS ST RD R/W
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0020 00001.0
SQ. FT.
18,720 ASSESSMENT
13,134.09
OWNER
STRAWDER, CHARLES E & BETTY L.
2176 BOTH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1368
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 2
LOTS 1 &2
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0020 00003.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
GRECO, ROBERT A & JANET R
2156 BOTH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 2
LOT 3
PROPERTY (2166 BOTH AVE) VACANT LOT
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0020 00004.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
GRECO, ROBERT A & JANET R
2156 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 2
LOT 4
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0020 00005.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
PULLIN, JOHN E & CECELIA E
2146 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1368
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 2
LOT 5
October 17, 2000
72
BK 1 15 FIG
5
8
•
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0020 00006.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
GRIMM. JAMES R & BETTY R
2136 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1368
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 2
LOT 6
PARCEL #
01 3-3-3-800003 0020 00007.0
SQ. FT.
18,720 ASSESSMENT
13,134.09
OWNER
SHAIA, HARRY G.
2155 80TH AV
7986 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1369
UNIT 2
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1368
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK
LOTS 7 & 8
0133 38 00003 0030 00005.0
PARCEL #
0131-3-8 00003 0030 00001.0
-2
SQ. FT.
9,490 ASSESSMENT
6,658.25
OWNER
MURRAY, JOHN E
MAIL
66 COUNTY LINE RD APT D-8
MAIL
83 CHESNUT RIDGE RD
SOUDERTON, PA 18964
UNIT 2
SADDLE RIVER, NJ 07458
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 1
PROPERTY (2185 80TH AVE) VACANT LOT
PARCEL #
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00002.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
BRONDELL, JOSEPH PETER
2125 BOTH AV
2175 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1369
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1369
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
•
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 2
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00003.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
BARANY, KURT J.
2165 BOTH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1369
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 3
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00004.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
VORRATH,GEORGE A III & DICKSON,SUZANNE
2155 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1369
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 4
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00005.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
DE SANTIS, DANIEL W.
MAIL
66 COUNTY LINE RD APT D-8
SOUDERTON, PA 18964
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 5
PROPERTY (2135 BOTH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00006.0
SQ. FT.
18,720 ASSESSMENT
13,134.09
OWNER
ARDEESER, CAROLYN C.
2125 BOTH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1369
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOTS 6 & 7
October 17, 2000
73
B11FIG 549
•
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00008.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
SMITH, RICHARD 8 LORRAINE
MAIL
12 PINEWOOD DR.
BRICK, NEW JERSEY 08724
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 8
PROPERTY
(2105 80TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00009.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
HEITZMAN, DONALD F 8 RUTH A
GRINDER STA
2085 80TH AV
TOTAL
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1367
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 9
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00003 0030 00010.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
JACOBI, CHRISTOPHER P 8 WENDY E
2075 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1367
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 10
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00011.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
BOLL, MICHAEL
GRINDER STA
2065 80TH AV
TOTAL
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1367
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 11
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00003 0030 00012.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
O-QUINN, JOAN D.
GRINDER STA
2055 80TH AV
TOTAL
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1367
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 12
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00013.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
VASQUEZ, LOUISE
MAIL
60049TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 13
PROPERTY
(2045 80TH AVE)
PARCEL #
0133 38 00003 0030 00014.0
SQ. FT.
9,360 ASSESSMENT
6,567.04
OWNER
TREGO, LARRY 8 KAREN
2035 80TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1367
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOT 14
PARCEL #
01 33 38 00003 0030 00015.0
SQ. FT.
17,299 ASSESSMENT
12,137.11
OWNER
AKINS, E, W,
MAIL
1930 NE 47TH ST SUITE 201
FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33308-77
UNIT 2
PBI 5)84
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
BLK 3
LOTS 15 816
PROPERTY
(2025 80TH AVE)
LESS RD RAN
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00001.0
SQ. FT.
7,565 ASSESSMENT
5,307.66
OWNER
CRAWFORD, DAVID
7960 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1325
UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 1
October 17, 2000
74
BK 1 15 PG 550
L
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00002.0 SQ. FT.
11,175 ASSESSMENT
7,840.46
OWNER
KEENEY, DAVE H & SHARON P
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1365 UNIT 3
MAIL
500 PELICAN AV / PO BOX 202
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 9
PARCEL #
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70114-1051
PBI 6-35
OWNER
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB UNIT 3
LOT 2
1955 78TH AV
PROPERTY (2115 79TH CT)
VERO BEACH, FL 32966 UNIT 3
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00003.0 SQ. FT.
11,175 ASSESSMENT
7,840.46
OWNER
STECHER, BERNARD & MARY HIGGINS GRINDER STA
2135 79TH CT
TOTAL
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1365 UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 3
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00004.0 SQ. FT.
11,165 ASSESSMENT
7,833.45
OWNER
CHEW, ELEANOR M.
2139 79TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1365 UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 4
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00005.0 SQ. FT.
10,737 ASSESSMENT
7,533.16
OWNER
LIGAMMARI, MARY
2145 79TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32960-1365 UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOTS
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00006.0 SQ. FT.
18,720 ASSESSMENT
13,134.09
OWNER
HALLIDAY, ROBERT J & KIMBERLY A
2155 79TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32966 UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 6 & W 1/2 OF TR A
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00007.0 SQ, FT.
18,720 ASSESSMENT
13,134.09
OWNER
KEHOE, PATRICK W.
MAIL
PO BOX 1312
VERO BEACH, FL 32961 UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 7 & E 1/2 OF TR A
PROPERTY
( 2156 79TH CT.)
OWNER MCCOY, NORMAN E & CAROLYN L.
MAIL 4133 CRISTLAND HILL RD
HEBRON, OH 43025 UNIT 3 PBI 6-35
LEGAL WESTGATE COLONY SUB LOT 8
PROPERTY (2150 79TH CT 1
OWNER
POOLEY, PAUL K & STEPHANIE L.
2146 79TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1365 UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 9
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 00001 0.0SQ. FT.
11,174 ASSESSMENT 7,839.76
OWNER
STOODLEY, BARBARA E.
MAIL
1955 78TH AV
VERO BEACH, FL 32966 UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 10
PROPERTY
(2126 79TH CT)
October 17, 2000
75
E I�SFIG 5 5 1
r
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 000011.0
SQ. FT.
11,167 ASSESSMENT 7,834.85
OWNER
WISE, PAUL A. & DORIS I.
7975 21 ST ST
2116 79TH CT
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-5165
UNIT 2 PBI 9-28
LEGAL
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1365
UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
OWNER
LOT 11
PARCEL #
0133 38 00004 0000 000012.0
SQ. FT.
7,532 ASSESSMENT 5,284.51
OWNER
EDWARDS, HOWARD R & GAY GARDNER
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
2106 79TH CT
PARCEL #
0133 38 00008 0000 00003.0
SQ. FT. 18,720 ASSESSMENT 13,134.09
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-1365
UNIT 3
PBI 6-35
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
LOT 12
PARCEL #
0133 38 00008 0000 00001.0
SQ. FT. 18,720 ASSESSMENT 13,134.09
OWNER
SWIECA, PATRICIA M.
7975 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-5165
UNIT 2 PBI 9-28
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
REPLAT OF TR 2 LOT 1
PARCEL #
0133 38 00008 0000 00002.0
SQ. FT. 18,720 ASSESSMENT 13,134.09
OWNER
CRAWFORD,DAVID(12) &TRIANO CHERYL(12)
7965 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32966-5165
UNIT 2 PBI 9-28
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
REPLAT OF TR 2 LOT 2
PARCEL #
0133 38 00008 0000 00003.0
SQ. FT. 18,720 ASSESSMENT 13,134.09
OWNER
BELL, SHARON M.
MAIL
270 W CENTER ST
MANCHESTER, CT 06040-4852 UNIT 2 PBI 9-28
LEGAL
WESTGATE COLONY SUB
REPLAT OF TR 2 LOT 3
PROPERTY
(7955 21ST ST)
ESTIMATED SQ. FOOTAGE TO BE ASSESSED 773,082
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST & ASSESSMENT( ROUNDED) $ 542,400.00
ESTIMATED COST PER SQ. FT. $0.70160733272
(ROUNDED) $ 0.701607
JDC WGTESWRPRELIMINARYASSMT
10/6/00
October 17, 2000
c
•
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY - AGREEMENT WITH INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER AND TAX COLLECTOR FOR
UNIFORM METHOD FOR THE LEVY, COLLECTION AND
ENFORCEMENT OF NON AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
THE EAST GIFFORD WATERSHED AREA MUNICIPAL SERVICE
BENEFIT UNIT (MSBU)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 5, 2000:
• &-d Cid, rar.C=W& t oW Govmomms Lw
MEMORANDUM William G. C Mas II, Dep Wc,,,W A,,,W
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Wim- William G. Collins If — Deputy County Attorney
DATE: October 5, 2000
SUBJECT: Agreement Between the Board of County Commissioners,
the Indian River County Property Appraiser and Tax
Collector for the Uniform Method for the Levy, Collection and
Enforcement of Non Ad Valorem Assessments Within the
East Gifford Watershed Area Municipal Service Benefit Unit
The Board of County Commissioners has scheduled a public hearing for
November 7, 2000 to consider the adoption of an ordinance and resolution
providing for the creation of the East Gifford Watershed Area Municipal Service
Benefit Unit and for the collection of assessments from the benefited properties
pursuant to the uniform method for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non
ad valorem assessments set out in Florida Statute 197.3632.
A prerequisite to utilizing that statutory procedure for collecting non ad valorem
assessments is a written agreement with the Property Appraiser and Tax
Collector providing for reimbursement of necessary administrative costs incurred.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached written agreement with the
Property Appraiser and Tax Collector providing for reimbursement of necessary
administrative costs Incurred in the levy, collection and enforcement of non ad
valorem assessments.
October 17, 2000
77
•
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Stanbridge,
SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Ginn, to approve staff's
recommendation.
Deputy County Attorney Will Collins advised this matter would have been on the
Consent Agenda, but Tax Collector Karl Zimmermann advised that he has a standard
agreementwhicht the Tax Collector's Association has endorsed. It is very similar in
substance but is replete with statutory cross references and Mr. Zimmermann suggested that
Tax Collector -Elect Charles Sembler might want to formalize that later on, but this gets us
moving.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13.A. -E. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
None.
A.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are
being prepared separately.
October 17, 2000
78
BK195PG55
H.C. ENVIRGNMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
The Chairman announced that following the Solid Waste Disposal District meeting,
the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Environmental Control
Board. Those minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 10:32 a.m.
ATTEST:
L
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved
October 17, 2000
Fran B. Adams, Chairman
79
BK615PG555