Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-126AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 WORK ORDER NUMBER REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS 6 -.2.>/f 2a 10 �3 This Amendment 1 to Work Order Number 10 is entered into as of this 2-1 day of Jung , 2015, pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services, dated December 6, 2011, and that certain Extension and Amendment of Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 4th day of November, 2014 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and CDM Smith, Inc. ("Consultant"). 1. The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth in existing Work Order Number 10, Effective Date April 16, 2014. 2. The COUNTY and the Consultant desire to amend this Work Order as set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work) attached to this Amendment and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), and within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A (Time Schedule), all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. 3. From and after the Effective Date of this Amendment, the above -referenced Work Order is amended as set forth in this Amendment. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: CDM Smith, Inc. By: Title: Pres; G��tdTY Cpl'•• ti *. ���s't BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS V OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY eo �((��� yam . •=`l i 1 Wes ey S. DavisChairman''06yF1A.. INMr .... .. BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, By: Approved: er Deputy "- erk Joseph A. aird, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficienc .,Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALL ABOARD FLORIDA REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS AMENDMENT NO. 1 BACKGROUND All Aboard Florida (AAF) is developing a passenger rail service between Orlando and Miami, Florida. As part of the proposed project, there are 30 instances within the Indian River County boundaries where the proposed rail system crosses County, City or private roadways. As part of the project development, AAF has prepared a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) and a noise study that address potential issues or concerns relative to obtaining easements for each crossing from the governing entity of each intersection and the compatibility of the proposed crossings with existing environmental components. Specifically, there are 21 such crossings where the rail system crosses County roads, for which AAF and the County must develop lease agreements. The remaining 9 crossings are either at City intersections or crossings of privately owned land. In addition, there are 2 Florida Department of Transportation crossings within the County that will be excluded from this scope of services. The County has requested the services of CDM Smith Inc. (Consultant) to review the EIS on behalf of the Public Works Department and provide comments to the County relative to all 30 crossings. CONSULTANT completed the evaluation of all 30 crossings within the County boundaries, as well as a comprehensive review of the DEIS in December 2014. The effort required far more meetings than anticipated and the DEIS review required additional efforts as well. The following amended scope of services details the tasks that were necessary to complete the review. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant will perform the following services associated with the review of AAF's EIS. TASK 1.0 EIS DOCUMENT REVIEW The DEIS, as presented by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and AAF, was far more deficient than anticipated when compared to the governing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements for such a document. The review required additional efforts to identify the shortfalls and compile the resulting document for submittal to FRA by the deadline. Specifically, additional tasks included increased coordination with the County Historian on cultural resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers coordination related to Coastal Zone Management (including review of the County's Coastal Zone Management Policy), environmental justice review, more detailed review of NEPA requirements and additional traffic/ridership review. This resulted in approximately $10,940 in additional services. TASK 2.0 REVIEW OF NOISE STUDY No change from original scope of services. TASK 3.0 FIELD EVALUATION OF CROSSINGS No change from original scope of services. A-1 jj1693 doc TASK 4.0 MEETINGS WITH COUNTY STAFF This task originally provided for 4 hours of meetings with staff. In actuality, CONSULTANT was requested to participate in 70.5 hours of meetings (for an increase of 66.5 hours), resulting in $12,045 in additional services. TASK 5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL No change from original scope of services. Subtask 5.1 Project Quality Management No change from original scope of services. Subtask 5.2 Project Status Reports No change from original scope of services. OTHER SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICES No change from original scope of services. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES No change from original scope of services. TIME SCHEDULE No change from original scope of services. The deadline for submittal to FRA was met. A-2 jj1693. doc EXHIBIT B FEE SCHEDULE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR ALL ABOARD FLORIDA REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Review of All Aboard Florida Environmental Planning Documents Task Description Original Amendment No. 1 Total Task 1 EIS Document Review $8,640 $10,940 $19,580 Task 2 Review of Noise Study $4,320 $0 $4,320 Task 3 Field Evaluation of Crossings $5,760 $0 $5,760 Task 4 Meetings with County Staff $2,160 $12,045 $14,205 Task 5 Project Management and Quality Control $1,512 $0 $1,512 Other Direct Costs $1,150 $0 $1,150 Total Upper Limit (Not to Exceed) $23,542 $22,985 $46,527 B-1 jj1693.doc