Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/24/2015 (3)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2015 - 9:00 A.M. County Commission Chamber Indian River County Administration Complex 180127`6 Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DISTRICT Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Peter D. O'Bryan Tim Zorc District 1 District 5 District 2 District 4 District 3 Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 9:00 A.M. Commissioner Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Dylan Reingold, County Attorney 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 1 through April 30, 2015 as Water Conservation Month in Indian River County B. Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 15, 2015 as Jackie Robinson Day PAGE 1 2 March 24, 2015 Page 1 of 6 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of March 3, 2015 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION A. Proclamation and Retirement Award Honoring Bruce Meguin on His Retirement from Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Emergency Services/Fire Rescue with Twenty -Four Years of Service PAGE 3-4 B. Proclamation and Retirement Award Honoring Walter Slusser on His Retirement from Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Public Works/Facilities Management Division with Twenty - Eight Years of Service 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Warrants — March 6, 2015 to March 12, 2015 (memorandum dated March 12, 2015) 5-6 7-14 B. Approval of Annual Financial Report by County Commissioners and Notice of CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) Completion (memorandum dated March 18, 2015) 15-24 C. Sector 3 Dune Repair Project, Change Order No. 2 Contract Increase — Additional Sand Fill, Guettler Brothers Construction, LLC (memorandum dated March 17, 2015) D. Work Order No. 8 Ecological Associates, Inc., Sector 3 Beach Restoration Project, Post Construction Biological Monitoring Services (memorandum dated March 16, 2015) 25-26 27-40 E. Board Consideration to Authorize Staff to Apply for Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program Cost -Share Grants for Replacement of the Round Island Riverside Park Boardwalk and for Dock Restoration at the Archie Smith Fish House (memorandum dated March 16, 2015) 41-46 F. Preservation Pointes Property Owners Association's Request for Release of Certain Easements on Lots in Preservation Pointes Phases I and II (Timber Ridge P.R.D.) (memorandum dated March 16, 2015) 47-52 March 24, 2015 Page 2 of 6 8. CONSENT AGENDA PAGE G. Final Pay to MBV for WO No. 5 — South County RO Facility Storage & Piping Tank Modifications (memorandum dated March 11, 2015) 53-55 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES A. Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller, Jeffrey R. Smith Presentation of Summary Review of the September 30, 2014 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Faith Baptist Church, Inc. of Vero Beach, Fla.'s Request for Special Exception Use Approval for a Modular Office Addition (memorandum dated March 12, 2015) Quasi Judicial 2. Consideration of County -initiated Amendments to Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Chapter 902 (Administrative Mechanisms) and Chapter 915 (Planned Developments) to Grant the Planning and Zoning Commission the Authority to Approve Certain Modifications to Planned Development (PD) Setbacks and Other Dimensional Criteria and the Powers of the Board of (Zoning) Adjustment to Grant Variances (memorandum dated March 9, 2015) Legislative B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS None C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS None 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS None 56-66 67-90 March 24, 2015 Page 3 of 6 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS PAGE A. B. C. D. E. F. G. Community Development None Emergency Services None General Services None 1. Human Services None 2. Sandridge Golf Club None 3, Recreation None Human Resources None Office of Management and Budget None Public Works 1. Presentation of the Indian River County 2014 Beach Preservation Plan Update (memorandum dated March 17, 2015) Utilities Services None 91-96 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS A. Legislative Update — Talking Points (memorandum dated March 17, 2015) 97-101 March 24, 2015 Page 4 of 6 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS PAGE B. Request for Closed Attorney -Client Session Relating to Ocean Concrete and George Maib vs. Indian River County (Case No.: 20071589 -CA 17) (memorandum dated March 13, 2015) 102 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. B. C. D. E. Commissioner Wesley S. Davis, Chairman None Commissioner Bob Solari, Vice Chairman None Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher None Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan None Commissioner Tim Zorc None 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. B. C. Emergency Services District 1. Approval of Minutes Meeting of February 17, 2015 2. Potential Lawsuit Challenging U.S. Department of Transportation's Approval of the Issuance of $1,750,000,000 of Tax Exempt Private Activity Bonds for All Aboard Florida (memorandum dated March 17, 2015) Solid Waste Disposal District None Environmental Control Board None 16. ADJOURNMENT 103-104 March 24, 2015 Page 5 of 6 Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meeting may be broadcast live by Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. March 24, 2015 Page 6 of 6 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 1 THROUGH APRIL 30, 2015 AS WATER CONSERVATION MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WHEREAS, water is the basic and essential need of every living creature, and clean, safe and sustainable water resources are vital to Indian River County's economy, environment, citizens and visitors; and WHEREAS, to support life, the average adult needs a little more than 1/2 gallon of water daily, yet each person in Florida uses about 120 to 150 gallons of water a day; and WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Water Management Districts, and Indian River County continue to work together in an effort to increase awareness about the importance of water conservation; and WHEREAS, every business, visitor and resident can make a difference when it comes to saving water; and WHEREAS, Indian River County Utilities supports conservation efforts by promoting the use of Reclaimed Water to meet non -Potable water needs, such as landscape irrigation and industrial processes; and WHEREAS, Indian River County Utilities shows a commitment to water conservation through an established rate plan that encourages reduced usage; and WHEREAS, Indian River County Utilities continues to perform Internal Water Audits to ensure system efficiency; and WHEREAS, water conservation is the easiest, and least costly approach at preserving our finite natural resource. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that the month of April 2015, be designated as WATER CONSERVATION MONTH in Indian River County, and all citizens are encouraged to use this occasion to increase their awareness of the importance of Water Conservation and the need to use Water more efficiently. Adopted this 24th day of March, 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Bob lari, Vice hairman Peter D Tim or Fl--scher ' 0' an (.? PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 15, 2015 AS JACKIE ROBINSON DAY J(� WHEREAS, April 15, 2015 will mark the 68th anniversary of Jackie Robinson making his Major League debut with the Brooklyn Dodgers as he broke the color barrier in 1947 to become the first African-American to play Major League Baseball; and WHEREAS, Jackie Robinson spent nine Spring Trainings (1948-56) at Dodgertown, Vero Beach and the Dodgers advanced to the World Series five times in those years; and WHEREAS, In 1948 Dodgertown became the first and only integrated Spring Training site in the South; and WHEREAS, Major and Minor League Baseball celebrates Jackie Robinson Day nationally each April 15th, and Minor League Baseball President & CEO Pat O'Conner said, "Minor League Baseball is proud to be part of this annual celebration of a baseball icon as the St. Lucie Mets and the Brevard County Manatees face off to benefit a worthy cause, the United Way of Indian River County"; and WHEREAS, the cost of this Minor League Baseball game is kept low so that it can be a true community -wide celebration; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board designates April 15, 2015 as Jackie Robinson Day and hereby congratulates the Major League Baseball on its work and success in Indian River County over the past 67 years. Adopted this 24th day of March, 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'` INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA f Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Bob •lari, Vice Chairman 2 PROCLAMATION HONORING BRUCE MEGUIN ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES/FIRE RESCUE WHEREAS, Bruce Meguin retired from Indian River County Fire Rescue effective April 4, 2015; and WHEREAS, Bruce Meguin began his career in 1987 as a volunteer with the Sebastian Volunteer Fire Department, during which time he graduated at the top of his Fire Recruit class and obtained his EMT license. On April 5, 1991, Bruce was hired as a permanent Fire Rescue employee with Indian River County. He was promoted to Driver/Engineer on February 28, 2003, and continued in this capacity until his retirement. WHEREAS, Bruce Meguin has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During his twenty-four years of service, he was dedicated and his work was greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Bruce Meguin's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last twenty-four years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in all his future endeavors! Adopted this 24th`' day of March 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Wesley S. Davis, Chairman 411, (oS, 4 4 kr , `J 1 1 , (I fl il ` t t ( ( t tJohn �t , i i its is to certify that Bruce !leguin is Fiere6y presented this 1ctirement Award for outstanding performance and faitfifu(serr'ice to Indian 1 'ver Count y Board of County Commissioners For twent-four ears of service On this 4th day of Apri(2015 7(fng 'Wes&y S. Davis. ctor of Emergency Services Boariof County Commissioner, Chairman ) i mamocI-`•�,'� . �Gyr' ^' ,✓/--�J04-2- ��-./��_.�y/ . _.___�-\� 1 PROCLAMATION HONORING WALTER SL USSER ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DIVISION WHEREAS, Walter Slusser retired from Indian River County Facilities Management Division effective March 31, 2015; and WHEREAS, Walter Slusser began his career on August 13, 1986, as a Tradesworker I and continued in this capacity until his retirement. Walter's selflessness, attention to detail and can do attitude will be missed. His ability to work across the trades and repair any and all systems is the true definition of a Tradesworker. His historical knowledge of the County's facilities is unmatched. Walter is well known by all County employees, which speaks volumes to his ability to get the job done. Walter's retirement will leave a tremendous void not only in our department, but in the County as a whole; and WHEREAS, Walter Slusser has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During his twenty-eight years of service, he was dedicated and his work was greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Walter Slusser's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last twenty-eight years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in all his future endeavors! Adopted this 24th day of March 2015. laV BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA OR1�� Wesley S. Davis, Chairman This. is to certify that WaCterSCusser is Fiere6y presentee this Woirement Award for outstanding performance and fait/ifu(sewice to Indian fiver County Board of County Commissioners Eor twenty-eight years of service On this 31st day of �YtarcFi 2015 Christopher Mora, PE Director of Public Works Wesley S. Davis Board of County Commissioner, Chairman JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: March 12, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS March 6, 2015 to March 12, 2015 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of March 6, 2015 to March 12, 2015. Attachment: DB: MS 7 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 323588 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 120.85 323589 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 40.27 323590 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 114.80 323591 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 33.17 323592 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 18.15 323593 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 73.12 323594 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3.86 323595 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 55.91 323596 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 11.32 323597 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 34.49 323598 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 1.70 323599 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 52.65 323600 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 211.12 323601 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 76.85 323602 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 124.80 323603 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 86.22 323604 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 69.64 323605 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 92.53 323606 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 86.22 323607 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 18.14 323608 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 43.97 323609 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 73.66 323610 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 86.22 323611 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 35.92 323612 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 86.22 323613 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 82.19 323614 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 62.49 323615 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 85.42 323616 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 77.14 323617 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 59.71 323618 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 35.33 323619 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 419.06 323620 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 106.13 323621 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 45.61 323622 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 26.06 323623 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 57.49 323624 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 21.58 323625 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 74.29 323626 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 59.07 323627 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 43.69 323628 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 82.44 323629 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 167.52 323630 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 80.69 323631 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 61.50 323632 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 177.17 323633 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 383.96 323634 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 20.17 323635 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 35.92 323636 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 100.00 323637 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 66.03 323638 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 92.53 323639 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 34.16 323640 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 112.64 323641 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 66.80 323642 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 63.67 323643 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 43.69 323644 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 82.28 323645 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 79.11 1 CHECK NBR 323646 323647 323648 323649 323650 323651 323652 323653 323654 323655 323656 323657 323658 323659 323660 323661 323662 323663 323664 323665 323666 323667 323668 323669 323670 323671 323672 323673 323674 323675 323676 323677 323678 323679 323680 323681 323682 323683 323684 323685 323686 323687 323688 323689 323690 323691 323692 323693 323694 323695 323696 323697 323698 323699 323700 323701 323702 323703 323704 323705 CK DATE VENDOR 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS PORT CONSOLIDATED INC FIRE EQUIPMENT SVC OF ST LUCIE INC JORDAN MOWER INC CHISHOLM CORP OF VERO VELDE FORD INC AT&T WIRELESS DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC SEWELL HARDWARE CO INC B G KENN INC E -Z BREW COFFEE & BOTTLE WATER SVC GRAINGER GRAINGER KELLY TRACTOR CO GRAYBAR ELECTRIC REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY CO PHYSIO CONTROL INC HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC BFS RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC CALL ONE INC BARTH CONSTRUCTION INC CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF IRC INC DELL MARKETING LP AMOUNT 84.00 39.04 57.67 66.64 42.04 21.50 61.79 830.50 69.48 100.00 47.20 96.16 81.64 81.83 30.16 57.51 30.87 21.02 33.16 7.15 13.30 59.77 64.28 32.42 57.40 1.53 17.38 52.99 87.17 107.10 39.44 40.27 2.60 20,631.12 502.50 173.11 68.95 142.47 1,887.84 84.05 55.68 105.42 64.41 25.56 222.90 573.18 399.65 411.50 61.04 11,368.36 840.45 92.00 99.02 186.85 1,491.15 480.96 229.00 3,003.38 18,948.88 5,177.65 2 CHECK NBR 323706 323707 323708 323709 323710 323711 323712 323713 323714 323715 323716 323717 323718 323719 323720 323721 323722 323723 323724 323725 323726 323727 323728 323729 323730 323731 323732 323733 323734 323735 323736 323737 323738 323739 323740 323741 323742 323743 323744 323745 323746 323747 323748 323749 323750 323751 323752 323753 323754 323755 323756 323757 323758 323759 323760 323761 323762 323763 323764 323765 CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 3/12/2015 XEROX CORP SUPPLIES 8.26 3/12/2015 GENERAL PART INC 2,077.52 3/12/2015 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 49.00 3/12/2015 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 1,038.36 3/12/2015 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 148.91 3/12/2015 PRECISION CONTRACTING SERVICES INC 9,071.00 3/12/2015 MICROMARKETING LLC 529.00 3/12/2015 NEWSBANK INC 3,603.50 3/12/2015 GO COASTAL INC 55.00 3/12/2015 SOFTWARE HARDWARE INTEGRATION 5,000.00 3/12/2015 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 542.29 3/12/2015 CITY OF VERO BEACH 60,586.46 3/12/2015 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 142.32 3/12/2015 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 478.38 3/12/2015 EBSCO INDUSTRIES INC 31,262.49 3/12/2015 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 742.20 3/12/2015 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 549.00 3/12/2015 AQUAGENIX 650.00 3/12/2015 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 37,371.21 3/12/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 47.54 3/12/2015 ELIZABETH MARTIN 99.68 3/12/2015 DON LAWLESS 100.00 3/12/2015 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 65.00 3/12/2015 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 611.28 3/12/2015 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 63,360.09 3/12/2015 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,838.21 3/12/2015 TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC 164.39 3/12/2015 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC 9,571.41 3/12/2015 CITY OF FELLSMERE 151.77 3/12/2015 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC COOP INC 379.00 3/12/2015 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2,100.00 3/12/2015 BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOC OF FLORIDA 1,250.00 3/12/2015 BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOC OF FLORIDA 250.00 3/12/2015 BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOC OF FLORIDA 399.00 3/12/2015 FLORIDA STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION 59.00 3/12/2015 BE SAFE SECURITY ALARMS INC 356.70 3/12/2015 GERALD A YOUNG SR 90.00 3/12/2015 CARTER & VERPLANK INC 4,096.60 3/12/2015 GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER 5,083.09 3/12/2015 NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SPORTS 80.00 3/12/2015 ALAN C KAUFFMANN 160.00 3/12/2015 G K ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3,935.00 3/12/2015 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC 479.90 3/12/2015 HERMOSA PROPERTIES LLC 64.00 3/12/2015 GEORGE PEREZ 10.00 3/12/2015 ELXSI INC 706.49 3/12/2015 AIRGAS CARBONIC INC 3,075.89 3/12/2015 SEBASTIAN LIONS CLUB CHARITY FOUNDATION 2,500.00 3/12/2015 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 500.00 3/12/2015 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 249.00 3/12/2015 HAYTH,HAYTH & LANDAU 125.00 3/12/2015 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 654.50 3/12/2015 VICTOR DIXON 2.58 3/12/2015 BERNTSEN INTERNATIONAL INC 372.60 3/12/2015 THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH 64.00 3/12/2015 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 1,313.13 3/12/2015 RACHEL IVEY 11.29 3/12/2015 VAN WAL INC 192.00 3/12/2015 JOSEPH W VASQUEZ 120.00 3/12/2015 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 40.02 3 CHECK NBR 323766 323767 323768 323769 323770 323771 323772 323773 323774 323775 323776 323777 323778 323779 323780 323781 323782 323783 323784 323785 323786 323787 323788 323789 323790 323791 323792 323793 323794 323795 323796 323797 323798 323799 323800 323801 323802 323803 323804 323805 323806 323807 323808 323809 323810 323811 323812 323813 323814 323815 323816 323817 323818 323819 323820 323821 323822 323823 323824 323825 CK DATE VENDOR 3/12/2015 MCMAHON ASSOCIATES INC 3/12/2015 DICKERSON FLORIDA INC 3/12/2015 GRAHAM CLAYBURN 3/12/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 3/12/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 3/12/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 3/12/2015 STANLEY CONSULTANTS INC 3/12/2015 LARRY STEPHENS 3/12/2015 JOSE RIVERA 3/12/2015 CAROLE J MADIGAN 3/12/2015 KEN CHATAM 3/12/2015 KENNY CAMPBELL JR 3/12/2015 PAK MAIL 3/12/2015 JOHNNY B SMITH 3/12/2015 SAINT EDWARDS SCHOOL INC 3/12/2015 DANE MACDONALD 3/12/2015 GLOBALSTAR USA 3/12/2015 CHARLES A WALKER 3/12/2015 INDIAN RIVER RDA LP 3/12/2015 LAZY J LLC 3/12/2015 TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC 3/12/2015 MARINCO BIOASSAY LABORATORY INC 3/12/2015 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 3/12/2015 COURTYARD VILLAS OF VERO LLC 3/12/2015 TERESA PULIDO 3/12/2015 MARRERO TEAM.COM REAL ESTATE LLC 3/12/2015 FILTERONE USA LLC 3/12/2015 LARIAT ENTERPRISES INC 3/12/2015 INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC 3/12/2015 WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC 3/12/2015 CITY DIRECTORIES 3/12/2015 DELRAY MOTORS 3/12/2015 FLORIDA COAST EQUIPMENT INC 3/12/2015 JOSEPH CATALANO 3/12/2015 RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN 3/12/2015 CIT FINANCE LLC 3/12/2015 KEITH GROCHOLL 3/12/2015 MANCILS TRACTOR SERVICE INC 3/12/2015 VERO BEACH BUILDERS LLC 3/12/2015 LINDA GRAHAM 3/12/2015 REHMANN GROUP LLC 3/12/2015 TIM ZORC 3/12/2015 ALTERATIONS BLESSED 3/12/2015 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 3/12/2015 LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC 3/12/2015 ALEX M1KLO 3/12/2015 AGN SPORTS LLC 3/12/2015 STEVEN G HANSEN 3/12/2015 LODGE AT GAINESVILLE 3/12/2015 LEARNING ALLIANCE 3/12/2015 TREASURE COAST TURF INC 3/12/2015 SEAN MAKI COMMUNICATIONS LLC 3/12/2015 MICHAEL YOUNG 3/12/2015 RACHEL G SIDMAN 3/12/2015 KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN 3/12/2015 C E R SIGNATURE CLEANING 3/12/2015 RYAN HERCO PRODUCTS CORP 3/12/2015 FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT LLC 3/12/2015 SAMBA HOLDINGS INC 3/12/2015 CONSTANCE TAIBI-LEWIS AMOUNT 2,940.00 745,350.04 10.00 219.57 222.55 124.18 2,993.15 40.00 60.00 870.00 60.00 120.00 157.12 100.00 4,005.00 40.00 119.37 100.00 76.00 341.00 143.10 2,980.00 2,435.00 213.00 240.00 79.11 49,358.00 291.70 70.62 284.50 360.00 239.58 298.77 40.00 40.00 261.21 40.00 85,552.20 127.00 240.00 9,865.00 198.06 65.00 5,398.46 8,726.00 40.00 150.00 240.00 204.00 4,282.59 1,280.00 345.00 60.00 64.00 890.57 5,850.00 768.75 47,179.75 1,240.32 105.00 4 CHECK NBR 323826 323827 323828 323829 323830 323831 323832 323833 323834 323835 323836 323837 323838 323839 323840 323841 323842 323843 323844 323845 323846 323847 323848 323849 323850 323851 323852 323853 323854 Grand Total: CK DATE 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 3/12/2015 VENDOR WADE WILSON FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY COAST TO COAST COMPUTER PRODUCTS BREVARD COUNTY BOCC VALERIE WATERS AXIS DATA SOLUTIONS INC DJS DISTRIBUTING INC BERNARD EGAN & COMPANY ANDREW D. FLEISHER, ESQ ALL N PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LANGHAM CONSULTING SERVICES INC FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING JANET NINA DOCKERY MINDY RENNARD, ESQ. RELIANT FIRE SYSTEMS INC COBRA GOLF INCORPORATED CHRISTINA WAGNER SHANA-LEE MOWATT SYLIVIA MILLER HAWKINS INC LEA STANOM CONNIE PETERSON COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA ADAM HELTEMES LYNNE GAYNON JOSEFINA ALVAREZ JAMES LANTZ YOLANDA CRUZ DARLENE GERARDI AMOUNT 120.00 9.66 390.38 660.23 250.00 1,362.39 1,298.00 598.98 150.00 950.00 10,725.00 93.00 120.00 319.82 831.50 638.00 120.00 120.00 1,902.00 2,054.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 45.99 22.25 75.00 35.00 56.95 78.38 1,344,403.29 5 TRANS NBR 3464 3465 3466 3467 3468 3469 3470 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH DATE 3/5/2015 3/6/2015 3/6/2015 3/6/2015 3/6/2015 3/6/2015 3/6/2015 VENDOR FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM JMC SERVICES INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF R J SULLIVAN CORP SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC IRS -PAYROLL TAXES AMOUNT 411,313.73 45,605.88 30.00 18,072.47 487,362.92 16,302.47 19,285.78 997,973.25 1 TRANS. NBR 1006062 1006063 1006064 1006065 1006066 1006067 1006068 1006069 1006070 1006071 1006072 1006073 1006074 1006075 1006076 1006077 1006078 1006079 1006080 1006081 1006082 1006083 1006084 1006085 1006086 1006087 1006088 1006089 1006090 1006091 1006092 1006093 1006094 1006095 1006096 1006097 1006098 1006099 1006100 1006101 1006102 1006103 1006104 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 3/10/2015 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC 1,436.70 3/10/2015 AT&T 29.34 3/10/2015 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 149.20 3/10/2015 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 1,081.81 3/11/2015 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 573.19 3/11/2015 COPYCO INC 138.93 3/11/2015 HENRY SCHEIN INC 8,060.75 3/11/2015 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 497.50 3/11/2015 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 1,863.75 3/11/2015 MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC 655.00 3/11/2015 MEEKS PLUMBING INC 225.00 3/11/2015 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 108.50 3/11/2015 CENGAGE LEARNING CORPORATION 164.37 3/11/2015 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF INC 2,539.27 3/11/2015 TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC 57.80 3/11/2015 BARKER ELECTRIC, AIR CONDITIONING 125.00 3/11/2015 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO 297.00 3/11/2015 RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 242.89 3/11/2015 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 54.80 3/11/2015 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 160.67 3/11/2015 AUTO PARTNERS LLC 170.54 3/11/2015 S & S AUTO PARTS 776.53 3/11/2015 STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC 630.00 3/11/2015 HYDRA SERVICE (S) INC 6,453.00 3/11/2015 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 6,734.20 3/11/2015 CM&S INDUSTRIES INC 3,670.00 3/11/2015 PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC 1,184.81 3/11/2015 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 77.88 3/11/2015 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 906.00 3/11/2015 AMERICAN CONCRETE INDUSTRIES INC 413.00 3/11/2015 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 880.00 3/11/2015 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 5,054.01 3/11/2015 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMITED INC 192.55 3/11/2015 JOHN DEERE COMPANY 6,749.05 3/11/2015 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 51.81 3/11/2015 POLYDYNE INC 2,507.00 3/11/2015 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 8.45 3/11/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 7.24 3/11/2015 S & S AUTO PARTS 82.46 3/11/2015 HYDRA SERVICE (S) INC 2,558.88 3/11/2015 HORIZON DISTRIBUTORS INC 207.77 3/11/2015 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 4,141.30 3/12/2015 COMCAST 121.21 62,039.16 1 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: (772) 226-1205 TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The Honorable Members of the Board of County Commissioners Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Diane Bernardo, Finance Director March 18, 2015 Approval of Annual Financial Report by County Commissioners (Consent Agenda Item) AND Notice of CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) Completion Section 218.32, Florida Statutes, requires that each unit of local government submit a financial report covering the operations during the previous fiscal year. Attached to this agenda is the report, which must be submitted within 45 days after the completion of the audit report. The Indian River County Local Government Annual Financial Report for fiscal year 2013- 2014 has been prepared and is ready to be submitted to the State of Florida, Department of Financial Services in Tallahassee. The report is to be signed by the Chief Financial Officer, Jeffrey R. Smith, and the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. In addition, we are presenting the CAFR to the Board for approval. This CAFR will be available on the County's (ircgov.com) and the Clerk's (clerk.indian-river.org) websites. Questions regarding the CAFR should be directed to the Finance Department at 226-1516. Recommendation We respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the Chairman to sign the County's Local Government Annual Financial Report and accept the CAFR as presented for fiscal year 2013-2014. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: FOR: March 24, 2015 Indian River County Ap•oved Date Administrator `�� 3/////fCounty Attorney i1:4 - 3— (1' (5 Budget3I / %(15 Department Risk Management 15 Unit Information AFR Details Unit ID: 100031 Unit Name: Indian River Original AFR AFR Status: In Process Unit Dependency: Unit Status: Active AFR Received Date: Audit Received Date: Contact Information Submission Type: Name: Mrs. Diane Bernardo Debt Information Title: Finance Director Phone: (772) 226-1205 Long -Term Debt: $85,862,037 Audit Information 0) 0 0 CO c 00 CO CO a) O 0 \ p (0 V an oto' M m 1?m E.' LL Was an audit performed? Yes Audit Performed Date: 3/4/2015 Auditor Name: Rehmann Robson M CO07 N CO L CA LL Lo L Ca 0 LO 0, CICC) vCD 00 0 Q(n(n> r Z `0 u) CO w } E 2 c 70. .o L (n U .£ N E c.co 0 a) o a) 0) r. U c .T 0 2a) u) 0 m o E� m E >, 0 in 0) LL �r 0 N m U o 0 a) 0 0 m -C a7 .@ a) N F_ T LL U .0 C a 00 0 co Z F— C11C O _ LL ` N o (n -0 m C _ U o0 .D -0N ci)0 (O C 7 0 NL 7 7 C a) C E o N W U - y rr a) a5(n (n -c 0 c N t o 3 2 c c o v 0 m E It c co0 y U (p x p) L1 ., ,_ a r m o� U 0 y a c y w c U O ct m co 'o co co r? LL to a } (� (6 7 (7a d .� �, `m w y m c>£ a) 0 0 m a) c E 0 N >- T" LL a) a) ch yJ a) y D j 0 C LI_0 m c tu Z F to y N M 0 p o Q co > 0 X X Location Information Name: Hon. Jeffrey R. Smith Title: Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Phone: (772) 226-1205 Fax: (772) 770-5331 Certificc Wednesday, March 04, 2015 16 00 ti) d a CD CO CD r CO (D 0 00 r N 0 CD 0) 0 0 .- N (0 O n 0 N M CO C) CO O O) O O N (0 (O (O CO CO Ln N V O CO O O (O M 0 M r a 0) O M CO M O O CO 0) a N a a M M (D a (O N 0 0 a 0 CO CO O) N. 0) N O CD M O '- f- 0) 00 O CO N a 0) O CO a 0) CO n CO a CO N M r a CD a 01 M O a a a CO Q) N a CO 0) N (A N N CO O W (O O .- 0 O) C0 M Co (O N CD 0 (O t` M h (f) O) .- 0 O) N O N N M 1: O N CO CO N (O N M O O) r 0 O 0 CD CO O a CO t') N i0 N CO CO M M (O co O 0) 0 a O (O I, 0) •- r N N (O 01 CO Cl. N .- N (O CO r CO CO CO N N CO a 0 N C') V) 1- N (0 N CO M Ni N N M N- 17. Ln N C` 0 r C) CD 0 (NI) 111) M N. a 8 (0 LO 0) O a a () LO 0 N o 0) a O (O O N CO CO N a CO N r` O Or) N 0 co CO a CO 1` in 0 CO O) O 0 0) N- O Cb o r CO O M coco 0 LO _ (O O a 0) O M CO M 0.- M M N N M 0 W (O O (0 N a 4) O M a 01 N N CO N M (O O (0 a h 0) N O 1� 7 t0 a0 N N L0 M co (O N (O 1 0) O O a N C (0 M Co co N O (0 CD CD 0 a (O 0) CO co 0 0 (0 N N O) O Ol O N N (O CD .- N �- 'aY W CD N Q a C77 O M N N y N et N CO W N r CO (0 ON N N N 0) 000 ^ N N CO CO (f) N 0 0) (O CO LOM t` N O M O) C0 0 co m N CO N O) 0 (O N 00) N V C00 0) LO 0 O W O O 0 0(l) 0 O) O) n N lO O M 0 O) /� O r N M O M N 0) CO a O (O C O) N N O) CO a f` O •Vi a 0 N W >LL w t 0 a CC 0) 0, C V d G1 �+ 0 0 N 0 ). X (o 0 1- U LL X d W 2 N X H N ~ � _U 0 i LL C a il t 076 w H H U .a co o E O c O 0 S > ti 0 1 N E a O LL O O o 0 0 0 0 O M a CO 0 N N N N (O 6000 - Local Business Tax (Chapter 205) M M M M M M M 322000 - Building Permits U N m0 a) N w 3 o 0 0 a) LL LL U- 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 C C C a 0 l L1• it 0 0 0 0) M a M M M N N N M M M 323700 - Franchise Fee - Solid Waste 0 a) 0 0 CU C h U N O J E O C CA r. 0 p.p� O C O y O U C C) fU N m ) W (Q C a) > 7 0 E C C C E 0) a) > (.1) o o a o a v, E E c 0 u 0 c 0 < E °� U U U O. y a O o o ? • .0 0 C Z C E `c C w 0 d 9. O m .N c ca r2 ``, r E y Q E >, w m o d 4 x aci 0) -> o o c _. ZC- a L O rn .� a c 0 m~ E m w ti. rn '� 7 .92 Z:50 o 'a m m o tu a .y N C (C 0 (o o O m m o y c 0 0 Tu. Ts" c .c .- m U U ow m in a N` H E Q 2 m (� m m 0' F2 A E a rn o) o a CO U O CC L 7 C C C �o E a E o a E== w c m d N y c:12y c m m; a N- = d C C N a) . (a L W 0 L V A (C (0 0 V) E n a E w a 5 y a 7 0 7 a E t w y a`, ? r 0 O 0 0 0 o d o E E 1 0 a 3 0 i O w a 0 U c A 8 L o t .c 5 co' co' co' U cc U cc U m a U w (n ' m O a iA O M O O U m a) a) o y y ,.N. c C C C C C c c C c E i 7 7 0 7 yy 0 0 F[ 0 0 t0 0 Q > C C C C C C C 00 00 0 0 0 LL ll LL O LL LL (O0 a < N C) U' U' C.'I U' U' U' (> C.J (.J a Ca (a C9 (a (a 0, �a (a > > >0 a>) 0 0 0 o u o 0 o (D a 0 0 0 Ca 0 (C CO 0 CO 0 <00 o C9 C9 0 0 0 0 XX m a 0 CO 00 0 0 0 CO CC co U N a) a) a) 0 a) al a) m aI a) d al d a) m N a) N a) m N E E E E E E E E a 0= 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LT % 0"0 m m (a (o m m m % m (O N O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL (n (n co co (n co N N co co l0 U) J F 00000000000000000000000000000000000 0 ( N NN 0 0 0 0 0 0) N O O N 0) 0 0 0 0 CO Q) N m O) 0 N M C Q to '- N M M CO N 0 '0 O N CO (O CD M a a CD f` O'0 N M 0) a y O a (n N O) M a a s a a a a s t! a a a aa a 1 (!) U (n V) N N N N N N N N N M M M M M COCOM COCOCOCOM M M M COCO NI M M M N N M M M M M M M M co M M CO CO CO CO M M M M M M M M M co M M M M M M M M J M M Wednesday, March 04, 2015 0) O N 4) n no 0 17 c Er SE 2 1- 0 q 0 0 0 1 W a €q 6 1 8 q 0 k C 0 d 0 o0 V a) 0 V0 0 V C 00 N V r 0 V r V M M r M (0 (1) (O 0) N O CO 0) N O M (D 0 CO N t0 o n O M V V N N. (0 0- N a) O C) .- M N 0 0 M (O (0 0 n M 0- 0 M 0 CO CO r O (D (0 0) N 0- 0) co _0 0 h r 0 0 V M 0) N n 0 (O V 0 Q M (D N M 0) O N N M CO V 0 CO CO V 0 CO CO CO V CO CO r n O O 0 a) O 10 ,- 0 V t` CO M M N N n N 0 Mr 0 CO r - V V N a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO (0 0) CO CO N M 0 "CO V O (O 0) V N 0 0) 0 a) CO(O o0 0) N (0 COM C) r 0 '- V CO LA N 0 .- L0 N M r 0 O '- N V N O (O V N 0 0 M CO N �- V V V'- V 0 N CO N .- .- 0 r O 0) N N 0) V M C) 0 CO N N (p V U7 V n M CO C) N 0) - CO M 0 0 0 L° O 0) (0 V 0 O M in rO VMO00 M O V C) N CO N tri Lri ,-2. NJ co 0) V (00 � r-: ^ 0) a) 0 V N V) O 0 0 V N M r 0 (O M N CO co CO N 0 CO (0 0 CO N CO V CO 0 r L0 (D M CO 0 (1°) JO a) n M r L0 M 0 CO CO r 0 (0 (D CO N r 0) L() r 0) 0- L0 0 V M (D M V' a (D o0 (0 V O CO CO CO V CO (D N o 0 (D V V (V M N N N M r- V V 0 N V 0 O O 0 (p 0 00 0 N Ni ai V o 0) (O 0 Cr) 0 (D 0) 0 V (D (0 N 0 ,- 0 N 0) r 0 0 V O N V) M CO o M N V V V V (0 (V 0 C 0 (0 CU N 0 C - C U min a ' E C d N A E C y N Z d 0 C E N °) tC '5 m °) N N C O C) d N tC O O` ,‘,:1,' W 6) N C .0 6) 0 -D. 6) (n 0 C7 n LL r r_ a m 0 U - 6, y o r 0 m .- E a p a m � a LL m U w U to w m ° E (` V1 Q) m 0 U D C) m N In co C O C C U_ O (+- O C_ 0) O _N C S .J. C - C l0 ° ',Do 6) G) D 0 O L N d O U O E Z q O L V' LL N N LL a)) LL C C) F ° N< U N a LL OJ N O 6) I. O L y1 N m 0 E N L J V) N O u L .- C] N (,= o " J` N 0 (n U) L O a N LL U p C 61 m U U O 6) (J p N L o W N y 6) y d y (n U L m L L q Q) C LL q E E q U C 6) O 6) N q U C J U J 0 U C) L 6) C) co co or o D7 > O o J O LL W O Z U U ° C) N O` ° O N O .> C N d ° J w C a O O O N O O LL V LL Uy q N a N L to L N N C (\) N U Z m U _ y U N U co c`, rn co rn rn 0) o rn rn LL LL «T. 2' N E a (0 ~ m N '° (� U Z c Z 0) 0 y LL m a c c c c '� ca u E E d o n = r r m 0 0(0 m = d_ d O U g rn ._ LL O N 0 (0 0 0 0 0 10 0 D 0 C p Cl O E co o) L to a _C C C 10 To N LL (�% LLL U J C Z O O Q: J Z E> ii S a< C9 3 0 0 a v) . C c c C _ c Z L C L L L L L L L L C C LL O D U O O E E E -- Z J C 6) n p n (n N (n n (n (n (n p a . , .p .o E E E >>-- 0) o o LL ii CO -i'',5 6) :• O 0) 0 7 0 7 7 o 'y 6) 0 V) 22 U 0 C) N C) N 0 Cl 0) 0 0) N m U U U U U > > u) 0 Z ' . i O J U J J J J J J J J to E 0) .0 0) U I y N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 - U 7� i L r > > >> > > > >> > U a0 lo: (L G co L L L L L L L L L L L O O O C J O O J i O b y �) O ° >O 0 0) 0 6) 0) C) 0 0 0 6J O E E O N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U ° U U ° U U C "O re m a: ° (7 m m y C7 0 0 C) 0 6) 0 C) ° 0 0 0 U U U Y U U U U U d d c Q d N C) C) U U C ,C U. T. 0 d U U U U U 0 U U U ' - it ,-)i-)g U U . 0 J m m m o N (O q N (0 > 2 d E m a� r Z Z t Z 2 Z Z 2 2 Z>>> u >> m 6Ci s m O C) 'O d N O O 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O tD (` F > > 0 0 O) h U .. to fn q (� 0) v) V) (n m v) C( () O w v) co v) v) co v) v) v) v) v) 0 0 0 o G U 0 o U 0 U U H H 1- -,-, a a U C 00#-00(00 0 0 0 !!) O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O JO O O Y 0 Jr, 0000000000 N 0(0 0 (0 0) N a 0) N 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CO '0- , N M V ,- N .- N N M V (70 N N N N C L0 01 0 M) 0 in UN) E U (V0 N (m0 E 0- Q- N M l0 0 6aa0 0p) 1.0 N N VN N M V I.0r,(� n 60 (00 CD 'C CD 60 (00 'C (0 63 m W 60 L600 (0 600 CO (00 CO (0 H M (/J M (M') U 0 CO M e[.11) M < (`M) V (��) (`�') (`�� f`1 O 'at M (a') co) 00) (a') 0) Com') 00) O LL V (') fp') 01 LL fes') M 0,el0') 01V CI 0')') M coom(�') I Wednesday, March 04, 2015 0) 0 M N 0) a 18 13 Eggc O 0 CO CO n CO N N O N 0 (1] O N Q 03 CO 0) 0 CO O co CO CO 0 N M N ((O CO_ CO N 0 00) Cr) n N (O O) CCO C0) OOi (00 000 Q Q O CO N NCOM 0) 0) N 0) (!) (O (O r` Q (f) �- 0) M (O 0 00 00 N N N Q M _ CO N ((0 N r Q1 N M 0 CO CO N V 'N.. (+N) ' CO N.. co N CO N CO 0 U r (0 O(D E Ell U3 CO oo 0) o oiN O _ CO V 0 0 CO Q CO N 0 Q CO Q M N 0 Q O CO 0 0 0 CO L N Q Q CO 6 0 COC. M N n ( O OD C ((0 W d 4) V 0) 0 N O N BI O aI o . M a Q 6 00 0 O CO (V(O CO 0 N 0 M (O (r) (O (- v) COCO N O 0) 0N O N ) N3 _ p N N CO N CO Q r CO OO (O CO Q CO CO q G MN:N CO COm0) tri 0) (O CO Q o) c0 N 6N: 0 N tom M (O M ( : 0 00 MtO CO I� 0 N 0 0 0 O 0 co Q COV CO CO00 CO Q n N CO (00 (00 0 NO n ORQ N 0 00j O N O) N 0 03 O o Q N n 0 N U 'o E 2y U2 C a d U >.g) oo d o 0 n m m 0° .0 m CO N J i:u EaOE E co oE EP c ap1� OJ (`0 y° O O Q T (n 2 y y 7 C 7 O O 0 y U CC y (� c c , U'� U ♦- U Q O cr 5 E- 2 d (n O j d C C n (j CO N N l�0 U C O y .0 C O C O E n Q C y U c m m 2 92 o it m a' c c d y m O c To 'v rn m x 7 o °m n 'n C (0 C O) C y .O j, LL to (a U C a) m LL L U N m y Z' _ O y a m O U Z' r: C 6. y EL c o c c U' W Q > > (0 L O C O a) O 0 O 0 0 0 LL_ J U C .O (/J y LL y C A ��!! J C N U U U E 0 O y y 0 - 0) y 0 O D g', O LL a) TJ a) f d N O O cc G 3> m m t t_ v 2 a1 d a1 tr, c n m c a1 c Q1 n V -'� N F O O ii iLL iq aci = p co U L Q O E a C N N 0 (7 CO0 0 00 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 m 0 00,C00 0 00E-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 CO CO 0) 0) 0) 0.- E (- 0 0 0 0 N 6— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) o n O 00 0 coQ0o a0 01 0 N Q co N Q (f) (O r m 0 0, 7 01 Q (Q+) (A) Ci CQ') CQ') rr 'A U M M ll (4') rte'') ((') W r0') C0') C0') (0') (0') C0') M (4') C4') (�) V) 4 0) 0 4- LriN 0) 00 N (00 00) 00 co 00) Wednesday, March 04, 2015 0) O G) 0) (0 a 19 Expenditures Report for FYE 2014 O O.- N � s N O(0 N V n CO M 0) (0 0) O N l0 CO CD V) N N N CD (.4 U) .- ( O N O) O) M O Cr, 0) (O N 10 1() 0 (0 N. M V 0 Q ) (0 CO N. (- CO CV .-St 0) R GD 0 N` O 10 CO (O N N CO 0 0 (0 (O 0 (0 CO N. 0 CO 0 CO N O) (0 0) 10 0 00 CO 0) (0 00 0) CO M .- N N 00 CO N V O N 0) 0 CO N 0 CO 0) a M (0 M N h n M CO O 0- (0 (0 ).0 CO CO CO CO CO M ♦} N N O (O f` O) N N O N C a co" h CO N 0) (0 O 0(0 (O M N O (O (O .- O (0 CO (0 f. C 00 00 0) O0 M CO CO N O CO O N V (0 l0 N M ( (O h N O N (O (D N N (00 St N N< O 1O N N. M O M O N O C (D M CO O O N CO CO CO .- M CO 0 CO (0 (p CO M r CV N M (0 N O) F r O to (0 CO. 1.: O V) .- O V .- O N r O n (D N N N r CV CD N CO d CO 03 I,- 0 0 V N om o) v CO 1- M N co' N. (O I.- N (D a M M (o r CCVCO V 0 (0 CO 0 ( CO 0 CO 0N) 0 In r O CO (O M CO CO (0 (ry N CO (OO N CO LO O N` (o C- N 0) M (V U) 0) CO (O 0) (O 0 OD N N N 0 - N CO 0) OD 0 CO N CO 0) CONW O (0 0 0 (0 CO CO 0- N 0) O M N 00 U) 1(_ 1- 0) N 00_ N O_ CO O 0 CV y 1-. (0 O 0 O M O O 0 0 0 V M CO N O M (O O CON CO 0) .- r CO N N 0) M (0CO CO OD n V N W 0) N V N C ..-- CO `Cr CO N O M r �- 6 xi N CO O N.- O CO CO r CO N. (0 - 0 01O M CO (0 .- O n N O N O CO CO h N (0 CO CO CO (0 (0 0 (0 1,-, CO CO (0 0 O (0 VI t` 0 N N N- 0) CO N CD CO N O h 0 N (O CD (O N 0 00 h CO O CO O CO CO O CO o O M M C (0 R co 0 0 0 V o h co co M O N CO n.- N O N CO O CO O M M (0 N N N n O N V (() C V O O r N (O M O O co" M O Dr OO CO N7 N. N. (0 CO CD N Cr, 0) CO (0 O (O 0) N CO 0 M 0 N C.-.. CO N st N. O .- n 0) CO CO O 1--- O M lO N 4 co_ N M O a'- y O O N N O N N co' n co co I C (A N N U V m N N C Z a (D U 0) 2 19. > N O 8 d w to Q u) 7 10 N 5 °) 6 c O ea a m � w rn 0 c ,U c m e N 0 1O C 16 jp YO U N m m a C A « N N m a ` a N Q tn N a p m c o m m y a 0 U .0 m E `m .a c U a m w w w a �' m a 1a f0 a 0 U C7 U 5 'o m e w a>, u y i>> (n W? . O U C7 m �) o (co •E x m Q a >, . v) 0 c C c c w -0 Z X m m m m c O rn. m m m m m 0 �° c ul w 5 F O' �_ y N _N o a c c t -= c E E E E m a 10 10 ( c 0 (c0 (D c 0 c c c g. m a 0 0 0 0 ro m m m m d 0 0 0 co .m T-° H ,ii5 a y. .8 v v a 0 U E E E E 8 C8 U C c c c c ma m 10 0) a a CO m a (a0 Q a a m T.%) .1).> m m m m a 0 0 0 3 d O U.0 O V N N N N 0 N `0 A EEEE C C C C C C C C C c U_ d N m m U V U U O O c7/75 j m m m lC l0 N m m m 0 C C C }i > > > O O O L L L L « m m m O O O O 0 0 0 0 lY1 A 'cc_ -� -�� 0 U 0 d E :' U C7 0 C9 c c c 0 0 0 0 a a m m y y c0 c0 c0 0 0 E E E E a r r r r 3 3 3 3 m m m m O m m m x x x c c c m m m o 0 0 o m m i J J W W W LL LL LL J J J U U U U O O O O O J J J it LL LL it m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO .- M CO '- CO (O .- (h CO M (D CO r r M CD a0 .- CO (O CO CO CO CO I- N N N CO CO CO V < N N lO (O r O O O O CV N N N 11) (O (O 0 N )0 ( (O (0 (0 10 (O CO (0 V) (1 0 (O ) ( (O YO N ) ( (NO N (N0 (NO 0(() 0 NI N 1 523.10 - Detention/Corrections - Personal Services m c C (0 m .p w OE O 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 9,0 G t 0 0 U U U O O C C C m Y 0) 0 0 0 0 M N � � 524.10 - Protective Inspections - Personal Services m C a N W 7 c O 1 a (O O 0 c c 0 0 y a C C > U m a a` 0 0 M (0 N NLO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M CO CO CO (yo) co (0 O N N N N N N (O (O N 0 V) 0 0 536.10 - Water/Sewer Services - Personal Services m C CU 0.X W � Z c m � U a n 0 U U (0 um) 3 3 n (n mto o o r (f) N Wednesday, March 04, 2015 20 CO O N N O O (Or) 1- C O co CO N et 0) O V M - O CD (O a0 O O 1° Q 1� CO V 1� O 01 N O C V N CO N O O M CID (O O �O M CD O 0 r �J CO CD 1!1 M co N CO O) M O In l0O M r CO N f- CO 0 CO O) O O N M N M O 2 CD O f0 Q (O N N O CO OJ coOco sr f� O M O CO O CO 0) O O O l0 M N CO (^O V CO M N O' N p 1!) N e -(D O, N CO O' co co O 10 0 0 0 (D h M N N V N COCa et^ 0) 0 CO CO CO 0 et. 0 O O O O O N N M N M N O M M O CD O r- O O O N M' co 00 N t` (O O M (`') °i O r !D CO N C7 v v O CO O N LID 0 0 O N 0N on co o aD o to Co tn 05 o 01 0 CO 0 0) O 0) 0 N (° CO e- N O N CO CO CO l0 V CC O r O O r Q O O 0) M (0 O l0 CO Q N (Dr c- 0 0 COO (O r O f� I,- O M l0 N C e- r O O V N h 0 0 CO O a0 O CO CO CO CO (D V O a0 CO V CO (O M a O l0 O CO M CO 10 O O (NO O N CO N 10 N 01 CO CY) O s- 6 0 O O M O N a0 O p aO N M N O N O CO c- (•Oo sr) (0 l0 N (00 O (0.- (00 06 � C09 N r l0 O N N N N N O 0) CO CO a0 00 0 co O O C co N. M (O N' CO CV O 0 O M n COO0- CO D co 10 CO N N V CO CO ' N` O .- sr N O n CO n co n CO N 0 N n n N N 10 r 0 e- O CO 100 ((00 0 V (0 O oi N (0 t` N 0( COO(00 i 6 O u'i (O (D O CO csi(0 CD O n t` CD N O N CO CO M M 0) N 0) ,- (0 c) co O M c0 N- a, P CD 0 M .- e -M n y mco U y Z T yy f! y N m W a C m C co j n T U y y _ 10 c O m W f0 y m x Q y y :in, O G OJ wcm LLT CO CD mC y 1 Q C ID C my12 8CWD 0 CL O (O 0 W CC CL ca V o N y / Q '0 n iii m (0 73 m CD inda 2'0 2 y N n N yy a m Lu c c c a 0 U y0m m o r W ,cc' T Zi- Q m y a O 0 m y cym= m S mW c C y 0) G D c yE E E a n U) Dyn mCom 0,c co m a0m y m a c O m m w a c c Z X m Q m cm nT-O mO tm y a TvO a (c c cm mc00 1n w c m-2 y m w Is- (mx m Q mcC7 a0 mm mUUU c cU m.n comcA_Y y smc aE nE aE Ncw c w r 4, d m Q rn 0 d m y m nrn c E n c m0c mois a2n d"a c 0d 1p Ojr I g I ? "c 1-2 0m moa 0 U C 7 y D 0 0 u 8 c Za ° 7"11, y mm J 3m im O y 0 y y''r a 0 0 0 0 O W 0 Q r Li' 0 U 7 0 m W : ° y° € € >> d«•':`?Em mc c W yc n CO �) m 0 1�mJ a 0 U.(� O U C7 O ° c .E E :7c" .c m m N N O j mm EEE L af`7 co�7� �OuU y i m -d m m m A c c mc m r L Q E E LL LL m _Z_ OAy 0 Cai °m mc cccc N a O O (� 2N y N y SjSj2? mm 'm m m m LL LL LLm f0 l0 y _± _ C i0 H ~EE :y m mQmv m O Uco co cn `mno Qv C \C c NO O `O UOOOO O O L Uya LL0 m m m N C C C e- NQy y (0 co co m `p l0 y�y yN N C C a U OW m 70 y ZZ mUUU a a ( C O O w cc cr d C 'C m y y y y y UUV'CCQZ QOo`ommC R2L C 2 2( c L Lm U U y U O LLO O O O RD! >>>222N m(C O O Om mO JJO t0 ( CL m m m j L O J __yQ aj7 LL f2 r° N — O2 2 a a a a 0 0 0 J J m a a a a (nrnnNn5 U el) a U U r 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `,2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e- M O e- M co M CD .- M (D CO.0 CO e- CO CO. 0 CO. co.aaM (O <O O ni QpM CJ OO 0 M CO 0 M (O e- CO CD N) CO M CJ 00 0 M CO cO CO 0 CO r n n a0 CO CO 0) O N M M M V O N (00 (7) CO (mi ND (O co (0 (0 (p ((00 (OD r n N` r n r n 7- r 7- co.-: O O O O 8 CO M CO X M CO M CO M M V a p a0 C) l0 l0 co co W to co to 10 to N O N a1') V) V) a0 N N N N O to N h to a0 N to to a0 O (0 to N (0 (O O (0 to (0 t0 a0 (0 co (O (O (O CD O (O Wednesday, March 04, 2015 21 CO N N 1f) N- r r N C., 0 to CO V (1) N N 0) N- N l0 V O 0) V CO 0) N r 0) O (0 (i) M (0 r M V CO M O N M 0 V M r CO pp V M M )0 CO 0 0) V CO 0) OD OD CO N. - N. r r) V V (D O CO CO O O (O OD O .- O r O N V 0) O M r 0 0 r r 0) 0 O (0 0 6 ri (o N of 00 O ri O) ai a) CO N 0 (i1 ri In co. (O0 m ai N(6 (0 (7 Iri 0 aiV O (•i ri N r r r V M 0 (O r 0) N h O N r 0 a r M OD N OD M V V N N CO r N I- M 249,063,334 A C M O O Cc N n O . c ▪ u fn � ri yZ N (D Cp o N Y C LO W 0 d CA N (0 N N 0) N CO r M (0 M N N- CO (0 0 N OD N- N (D (0 0 CO (0 0 O Orn 0 0 r 0 CO 0) - 0) 0) 0 V CCO (0 00>_06 00>_ co O ui V Nn: (n O0 r- (ri ri N N 0 r) ui 00 N V V N (D r 0 0) O N N N r CO 0) N 0 0) M 0 (D CO V CO N 0 r 0) N N CO 0) 0- W 0) N r 0 0 O co (0 M O (0 r (D r Op M r V e{ r r LA V M r l0 r 0 (0 N CO CO r OD N r I, r M V V r O N.- 0 (0 CO 0 0 V r O (0 V 0 0 M M O 0 CO r M O O V 0 p) M (0 0 - V N O M ai tD r M M c (0 N N 0 (O M (0 M (ri M (0 Cr; C4 co M (. N r r r V .- (0 (O r V (0 O N 0) 0 V r N OD lO N CO V V N r OD N .- M 0 0) co N y (0C 0 0 C U � O C a Z n lL (0 x W .a C 0 0 0 0 • V N N 0 C .V G y C) y 0 0 (V d a 0 2 X lU C N !n a N N a 0 0 O a CD w 0 d S 2 U 0 O U 8 y WN Ca m W N 0 a 2 a m •2 >, h 'Z a Ta ' Z C w ( Ja N N 0 w (0 N to 0) LL.1x t` LC 2 C — 6 C O_ • l0 C 0 E •.2 N C h 0 0 6 O 0 !„0 CO .� A > .� N O) 0 CO A E Oa Ua° a m t `y m ▪ • E E V2 cu a) a Q oCD a O O o a o v t t a O UtO t>>7U7(> >> J E a OCD tUUUU0 " "0 o • 0 0 0j c 0Oo 0 0 O A gY O O O O O U `o`oO CO CO O O a U iC . Y-6 0 tp Y � C N 220rii ' U 0 CO N • U (' -) O O O O O O O U O O U U O0 O0 7 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 8 CO CO (h 4- M CO r r) M CO M CD .- M V 8. 0 0 0. c V eO (g) (g) O(0 (() (() (�O ((O r r 4 (D CO CD CO CD (D CO (O OD CO CO (0 fD (D (0 CO (0 CO 674.60 - Clerk of Court - Capital Outlay N cn 0) N N (0 0 0 C 0 N a Ill C x W • U (n DI W N N N N N y U y U )N (n n c E x (To p m 0 K a m a m 00 0 Z. g 0 f0 (0 W (0 w U W 7 0 l6 C O 0 a y 16 C l0 C O 10 c O O O N _N a O O CO .� pN _0 CO N N N a �` �' 0 N C) a N 0 a E `0 a f0 'C 'C , 0 a `0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 U (O a O a O 0 a r ---1.=•=z0▪ 04▪ " UCO UCO Ut UCO UtO 0 U J 77t t m 2 0 77 O t n' UO 0 0 O C U U U0 0 (n u, ;O L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 U U U U • U a▪ U U U O U O U 0 O o o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO .- M (D M CO CO CD (ri acCD Mno a c v c 0- 0- p (c Cco cl, D (00 (0 r r n r� 0- rr- • Y 0 0 • 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0) Grand Total Wednesday, March 04, 2015 22 Data Element Worksheet Report for FYE: 2014, Unit ID: 100031, Indian River Wednesday, March 04, 2015 23 Total Debt N 43 CO CNI = CO N a+ M co w C) :645 O C N CO O. N o X IH 69 w N r o) CD v CD 19 o m 4+ rn v O 0 d o .4- i- H >vi o_ b9 EA Component Unit Blended in Primary Report 300629 - Indian River County Emergency Services District Blended in Primary Report 300630 - Solid Waste Disposal District Wednesday, March 04, 2015 m .- o rn v o) 0. a 24 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray, Jr. Coastal Engineer �Vl� CONSEN SUBJECT: Sector 3 Dune Repair Project, Change Order No. 2 Contract Increase - Additional Sand Fill Guettler Brothers Construction, LLC DATE: March 17, 2015 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On July 8, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners awarded a contract to Guettler Brothers Construction, LLC. (Guettler) to repair the dunes damaged by Hurricane Sandy (October, 2012) within the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project area. The project utilizes sand from mined upland sand sources transported to the beach in trucks. The project will repair approximately 31,000 feet (5.9 miles) of storm damaged dunes by placing approximately 154,700 cubic yards of beach compatible sand landward of the mean high water line (MHWL). As required by permit all sand placement must occur prior to April 30, 2015. The total awarded contract amount was $3,076,920. On November 4, 2014, the Board approved Change Order No. 1 which eliminated the 75% Sand Stockpile Provision of the contract, but did not modify the contract amount which remained at $3,076,920. As of March 16, 2015, Guettler has constructed approximately 90% of the project area however has reached nearly 100% of the contact quantity of 154,700 cubic yards for sand fill. Staff determined that additional sand was needed to fully construct the project following recent erosion resulting from the December 2014 and January 2015 Nor'easters. Based on survey data provided by Guettler, our engineer has forecasted a new total volume to fully complete the project as designed to be approximately 175,000 cubic yards, which represents a 20,300 cubic yards/13.1% increase in the contract quantity for sand fill. M:\Coastal Docs\Final Change Order No 2 - Sector 3 Dune Repair Project -- 3-24-15.docx 25 Page 2 Agenda Item for 03-24-15 BCC Meeting Sector 3 Dune Repair Project —Change Order No. 2 March 17, 2015 The contract between the County and Guettler has a provision for up to a 25% (38,675 cubic yards) increase or reduction of the bid quantity for sand fill without affecting the bid unit costs. As it is clear that sand volume required to complete the project has now increased, Guettler has requested that the County issue Change Order No. 2 to accommodate the additional fill. At this time it is unclear what the final sand fill volume will be. As such, staff is requesting that the Board consider approving a not -to -exceed amount for Change Order No. 2 to be 38,675 cubic yards or a contract increase of $638,137.50 = 38,675 cubic yards @ $16.50/ cubic yard. Thereby increasing the total contact price to $3,715,057.50. FUNDING Local funding of Beach Restoration includes a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax Revenue as well as allocation of the One Cent Sales Tax. Funding is budgeted and available for construction of the Sector 3 Dune Repair Project in the Beach Restoration Fund, Sector 3 Renourishment — Post Hurricane Sandy Account No. 12814472-066510-13014. Additionally, this project is eligible for 50% state cost through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Beach Management Funding Assistance Program. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve a not -to -exceed amount for Change Order No. 2 to be 38,675 cubic yards or a maximum contract increase of $638,137.50, thereby increasing the final contract price to $3,715,057.50. Staff also recommends that the Board authorize the Chair to sign an amendment and any additional documents necessary in order to effectuate Change Order No. 2 once the final volumes and total costs are calculated. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: March 24, 2015 Indian River County Approved Date Administration .3 �q %± Budget 3/15 Legal V -1^ )4- u Public Works C/, 3/f/is Coastal Engr. Division JD 6 3I1IS M:\Coastal Docs\Final Change Order No 2 - Sector 3 Dune Repair Project -- 3-24-15.docx 26 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Christopher R. Mora, P.E. Cre' Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray, Jr Coastal Engineer SUBJECT: CONSEN Work Order No. 8 Ecological Associates, Inc. Sector 3 Beach Restoration Project Post Construction Biological Monitoring Services DATE: March 16, 2015 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On March 19, 2013 the Board approved a contract with Ecological Associates, Inc. (EAI) for professional coastal environmental services in Indian River County for a two-year term, 2013- 2015. On March 17, 2015 the Board renewed the contract until March 19, 2017. EAI is the selected County consultant for professional biological monitoring services related to the Sector 3 Beach Restoration Project. The proposed Work Order No. 8 provides year 2015 post construction biological monitoring services relative to sea turtle monitoring and reporting and Nearshore Hardbottom monitoring and reporting of the Sector 3 Beach Restoration Project Area. By Permit, annual Post Construction Biological monitoring is required for 3 years following a Targe scale beach restoration project. Work Order No. 8 also includes post construction sea turtle monitoring of Sector 3 Dune Repair Project. The 2015 monitoring entails the following: • "Year 3" annual post construction biological monitoring of the Phase 2b project area. • Sector 3 Dune Repair Project - Post construction sea turtle monitoring. Work Order No. 8 totals a lump sum amount of $299,883 All subsequent annual biological monitoring of the Sector 3 Project area will be addressed through future work orders. F:\Public Works\JamesG\Sector 3\EAI Work Orders\EAI WO # 8\FINAL agenda item Ecological Associates Inc Work Order No. 8 -- 3-24-15.docx 27 Page 2 BCC Agenda Item Sector 3 Beach Restoration March 16, 2015 FUNDING Local funding of Beach Restoration includes a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax Revenue as well as allocation of the One Cent Sales Tax. Funding is budgeted and available for monitoring and of the Sector 3 Beach Restoration project in the Beach Restoration Fund, Sector 3 Post Construction Monitoring Account No.12814472-033490-05054. Additionally, this work order is eligible for 50% state cost through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Beach Management Funding Assistance Program. RECOMMENDATION The recommendation of staff is for the Board to approve Work Order No. 8 to the contract with Ecological Associates, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENT Ecological Associates, Inc. Work Order No. 8 (1 original copy) APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: March 24, 2015 Indian River County Approved Date Administration I4 311 Budget 3 rg 6 Legal Yl/ e 3 i "lS Public Works (/yam. 3//8fiS Coastal Eng. Division JP G 3II b115 F:\Public Works\JamesG\Sector 3\EAI Work Orders\EAI WO # 8\FINAL agenda item Ecological Associates Inc Work Order No. 8 -- 3-24-I5.docx 28 WORK ORDER NUMBER 8 SECTOR 3 BEACH AND DUNE RESTORATION PROJECT 2015 POST CONSTRUCTION BIOLOGICAL MONITORING SERVICES This Work Order Number 8 is entered into as of this day of 2015 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of March 19, 2013 ("Agreement"), and amended March 17, 2015, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and The Transet Group, Inc. D.B.A Ecological Associates, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1, attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 2, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 2, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ecological Associates Inc. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Title: Chief Operating Officer Robert G. Earnest Date: C)?j -_ 1 By: /oseph A. Baird, County Administrator Approved as to fo ncy: By: Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: (Seal) Deputy Clerk Approved: By: William K. eBraal, Deputy County Attorney 29 Mr. James D. Gray, Jr. Coastal Engineer Indian River County Public Works 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. March 9, 2015 Re: Scope of Work and Cost Proposal for Sector 3 Post -construction Sea Turtle and Hardbottom Monitoring, Indian River County, Florida — 2015. Dear Mr. Gray: Ecological Associates, Inc. (EAI) is pleased to submit its Scope of Work (SOW) and Cost Proposal for providing Professional Environmental Support Services in support of Indian River County's Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project. Services described herein conform to biological monitoring requirements stipulated in Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) JCP Permit #0285993 -001 -JC and applicable U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Biological Opinions (BOs) for the Sector 3 Project. This work will satisfy requirements for: ➢ Year of construction monitoring for the Sector 3 Dune Repair Project (R-24 to R- 55); and ➢ Year 3 annual post -construction monitoring for that portion of the previously completed Phase 2B fill area that did not receive additional fill during the Sector 3 Dune Repair Project (R-20 to R-24). EAI will perform the following tasks under this SOW, with support from its sub- contractor, CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. (CSA), as detailed in Exhibit A: ➢ Weekly post -construction escarpment monitoring; ➢ Post -construction sea turtle monitoring; ➢ Marking and monitoring of a representative sample of nests to determine nest fate and reproductive success; ➢ Quarterly in -water sea turtle monitoring; ➢ Nearshore hardbottom monitoring; ➢ Post -construction UMAM analysis of hardbottom impacts; and ➢ Data management and reporting, as conditioned in regulatory permits for the project. All sea turtle monitoring activities will be performed under FWC Marine Turtle Permit MTP -15-010 in accordance with current or future superseding conditions and guidelines issued by the permitting agency. Ecological Associates, Inc. • Post Office Box 405 • Jensen Beach, Florida 34958 Phone: (772) 334-3729 • Fax: (772) 334-4925 • Email: info@ecological-associates.com 30 Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 Page 2 Scope of Work — March 9, 2015 Records of monitoring activities during 2015 will be provided to the County in a form and at frequencies mutually agreed upon. Monthly data reports and a year-end summary reports will be provided to the County in accordance with Exhibits B (Deliverables) and C (Schedules). EAI will submit its monthly billings for services to the County in accordance with the fees set forth in Exhibit D (Costs). No deposit or retainers are required. Implementation of EAI's services is contingent upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed. Ecological Associates, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be of continued service to Indian River County. Please feel free to give me a call should you have any questions regarding EAI's proposed services or associated costs. Sincerely, Robert G. Ernest Chief Operating Officer RGE/re enclosure c: Stan DeForest/President R.E. Martin/Scientific Director Niki Desjardin/Senior Project Manager 31 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT A Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 405 JENSEN BEACH, FLORIDA 34958 SCOPE OF WORK 1) Project Boundaries. The area to be monitored (Project Area) extends from R-20 south to R-68 in Indian River County (Sector 3). This includes the Sector 3 Dune Repair Project, the Phase 2B Project Area, and a control beach. Construction of the Dune Repair Project (R-24 to R55) is nearing completion, and Phase 2B (R-20 to R-24) was completed in 2012. The control beach, immediately south of the Sector 3 Project Area, extends from R-60 to R-68. 2) Monitoring Period. Post -construction monitoring activities will commence April 1, 2015 and will continue through approximately February 2016, as stipulated below. 3) Weekly Post -construction Scarp Monitoring (FDEP Special Condition No. 24). Escarpment (scarp) surveys will be conducted on a weekly basis within the Phase 2B Project Area from April 1 through September 30, 2015. In accordance with FWC protocol, scarps are functionally defined as an abrupt change in beach slope (greater than 45°) at least 18 inches in height that persists for a distance of 100 feet or more. The location of both the northern and southern terminus of each scarp will be recorded by GPS and average scarp height assigned to one of three categories (0 to 2 feet, 2 to 4 feet, and 4 feet or higher). Additionally, the maximum height of each scarp will be measured. The location (relative to R monuments), approximate length, height category, maximum height, and percentage of beach scarped will be presented in tabular and/or graphic format for reporting purposes. EAI will submit weekly reports of scarp monitoring data to FWC (marineturtle(&,mvfwc.com). EAI will also notify the County of any persistent scarps within the Project Area that may interfere with sea turtle nesting. The County shall be responsible for notifying FWC of the presence of those scarps and for coordinating any remediation measures, if required. 4) Post -construction Nesting Beach Sea Turtle Monitoring (FDEP Special Condition No. 29). Daily early morning nesting surveys will be conducted throughout the Sector 3 Project Area beginning April 1 and continuing uninterrupted through September 30, 2015. Thereafter, the surveys will be conducted three days each week until the last marked nest has been evaluated. During the daily surveys, all emergences (turtle crawls) apparent from the previous night will be interpreted to determine which species of turtle came ashore and whether or not it nested. Crawls will be denoted as being either above or below the previous high tide line. 32 EXHIBIT A Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 Throughout the period of monitoring, all nests and false crawls will be enumerated by pre -established survey zones and their approximate geographic locations determined by GPS (general accuracy of 3-5 meters). Each false crawl will be categorized as to the stage at which the nesting attempt was abandoned in conformance with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) requirements for beach restoration projects. Additionally, all obstacles (e.g., scarps, seawalls, etc.) encountered by turtles during their emergences onto the beach will be documented. EAI will coordinate its monitoring activities with other FWC Marine Turtle Permit Holders within the Project Area to ensure that it does not interfere with their data collection efforts. EAI will also coordinate its monitoring activities in a manner that best supports the County's Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and will furnish data collected under this Scope of Work to the County's HCP Coordinator in a format compatible with the HCP database. 5) Nest Marking and Monitoring (FDEP Special Condition No. 29). A representative sample of nests within the Phase 2B and Dune Repair Project Areas, as well as the control, will be marked between April 1 and September 15, 2015 and monitored throughout their incubation periods to determine nest fate and reproductive success. The clutch of each marked nest will be located and surrounded by a series of small stakes connected by brightly colored surveyor's tape. 6) In -water Sea Turtle Monitoring (FDEP Specific Condition No. 32). EAI will assess sea turtle population levels in the nearshore area within and adjacent to the Sector 3 Project Area. This assessment will be conducted quarterly during the following time frames: April -May 2015, June -August 2015, September - November 2015, and December 2015 -February 2016. The surveys will employ the same methodology and transect locations used since 2007. The methodology will include concurrent sampling of the Project Area and an appropriate control area to permit isolation of potential project effects from natural background variability. In -water surveys will be conducted from a boat equipped with an elevated observation platform and a GPS navigational system to allow constant monitoring of speed and location. The boat will traverse a series of 3 -kilometer long transects (three each within the Treatment and Control sites) at slow and constant speed (5-6 knots). Two experienced biologists will be positioned on the platform and will make observations at an eye level of approximately 12 ft above the water; one will monitor the port side and the other the starboard side. When a turtle is sighted, the position of the vessel at the time of the sighting will be recorded by GPS. The position of the turtle will be mapped based on the position of the boat and the observer's estimate of the distance and bearing to the turtle. In addition to recording the position of the turtle, the observer will also record the 33 EXHIBIT A Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 time the turtle was first observed, the species, its relative size, and whether it was at the surface or submerged. Surveys will only be conducted when weather conditions are acceptable for survey accuracy and safety. To eliminate the effect of day-to-day variability in turtle sighting conditions on the data set, surveys of the Treatment and Control sites will be conducted on the same day. If deteriorating weather conditions do not allow for a complete survey of both sites to be conducted in the same day, the entire survey effort will be repeated on the next acceptable date at no additional costs to the County. 7) Weekly Shorebird Monitoring (FDEP Specific Condition No. 35). EAI will perform weekly surveys for breeding shorebirds within the Sector 3 Project Area (Phase 2B and Dune Repair) from April 1 through August 31, 2015. The surveys will be conducted by ATV concurrent with daily sea turtle monitoring. All potential nesting habitat within the Project Area will be monitored. Any observed breeding activity will be reported to the FWC Regional Species Conservation Biologist within 24 hours of sighting and to the Florida Shorebird Database within one week of data collection. 8) Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring (FDEP Specific Conditions No. 48 through 54). CSA will perform nearshore hardbottom monitoring within and surrounding the as -built Phase 2B Project Area, which extended from R-20 through R-26.5, and a reference area to the south (R-63 to R-65) to fulfill requirements for "Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring" identified in the FDEP approved Biological Monitoring Plan (dated April 2009) and FDEP JCP Specific Conditions 48 through 54. This task, which constitutes Year 3 annual monitoring of the Phase 2B Project Area, will consist of two elements: field surveys along previously established transects, and mapping of the nearshore hardbottom edge. Monitoring will include the survey of eight previously established permanent cross -shore transects (R-21, R-22, R-24, R-25, R-26, R-28.5, Ref. R-63, and Ref. R-65). Along each transect, video, still photographs, and repetitive in situ quadrat data will be collected. The monitoring also will include the mapping of the landward edge of hardbottom along the entire length of the Phase 2B Project Area and south to R-28.5 (approximately 8,500 ft). 9) Preparation of an Annual Biological Monitoring Report (FDEP Specific Condition No. 54). Following the completion of Task 7, CSA will analyze transect and quadrat data in accordance with the FDEP Biological Monitoring Plan and prepare a summary report. The report will include appropriate graphics, tables, statistical analyses of the collected data, comparisons to previous years' survey data, and an assessment of project -related impacts to hardbottom communities. 10) Aerial Imagery Ground-truthing and Interpretation/mapping (FDEP Specific Condition No. 53). CSA will coordinate with the County's selected contractor to 34 EXHIBIT A Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 schedule aerial imagery collection during a period of optimal site conditions to maximize data quality and allow concurrent in situ diver ground-truthing for habitat verification. CSA will perform ground-truthing using bounce dives and/or cross -shore video transects. Geo -referenced field positions will be included in copies of the ground-truthing photography and/or transect video record to be provided to the County and FDEP. The aerial images obtained from the contractor will be digitized by CSA (as needed) to produce GIS -based habitat maps (ESRI shape files) and facilitate further analysis. CSA will use its ground-truthing to interpret the aerials used to produce the GIS -based habitat maps. These maps will then be used by CSA to assess post -construction hardbottom impacts (physical burial) likely attributable to Phase 2B of the Sector 3 Project. 11) Post -Construction UMAM Analysis of Hardbottom Impacts. Based upon the assessment of hardbottom impacts prepared under Task 8 and aerial imagery interpretation in Task 9, CSA will conduct a Uniform Mitigation Assessment Methodology (UMAM) analysis, pursuant to Chapter 62-345, F.A.C. The UMAM analysis will include qualitative descriptions of impacted communities and associated ecological functions, and quantitative estimates of the extent of impacts. CSA will confer with FDEP staff during and upon completion of the UMAM analysis to access any actual hardbottom impacts or the absence of impacts potentially attributable to the Project. 12) Summary Spreadsheet of Sea Turtle Nesting Activity (FDEP Specific Condition No. 29). At the end of the 2015 nesting season, an Excel spreadsheet of all nesting activity and reproductive success will be prepared and submitted electronically to FDEP and FWC. Data will be reported separately for each phase of the Sector 3 Project and the control beach. 13) Final Interpretive Report. Upon conclusion of sea turtle data analyses for the 2015 nesting season, a draft interpretive report, including an assessment of project impacts, if any, will be submitted to the County. This assessment will be based on statistical and other comparisons of nesting and reproductive success data between treatment and control areas. EAI will meet with the County to review and identify any changes warranted in the interpretive report. After such changes are made by EAI, a final report will be prepared and submitted to the County. 35 EXHIBIT B Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 405 JENSEN BEACH, FLORIDA 34958 DELIVERABLES Unless otherwise specified below, all reports will be delivered in a format (hard and/or electronic) and in such quantities as requested by the County. All reports will be submitted to the County in accordance with Exhibit C. Sea Turtle and Shorebird Monitoring Scarp Monitoring: Data will be reported electronically each week to FWC and the County. The County will also be notified by phone or electronically of any scarps that persists for two consecutive weekly surveys. Results of surveys conducted each month, including locations, heights, and lengths will tabulated for inclusion in the Monthly Reports. Monthly Reports: Records of daily sea turtle and shorebird monitoring activities, including names of monitoring personnel and times of monitoring will be maintained for the duration of monitoring. Within two weeks following the end of each calendar month, EAI will submit a summary report to the County that will include, a log of sea turtle/shorebird monitoring activities, number of sea turtle nests and false crawls by species, number of sea turtle nests marked and evaluated, and results of scarp monitoring. Nesting Database: All sea turtle data collected during the project will be incorporated into an Access database maintained by EAI. This data will be provided to the County in an electronic format, as mutually agreed upon, for incorporation into the County's HCP database. Appropriate QA measures will be implemented to ensure that data are completely and accurately transferred from field data sheets to the electronic database. In -water Sea Turtle Monitoring: Data collected during in -water monitoring will be tabulated and transmitted to the County at the conclusion of each quarterly survey effort. At the conclusion of 2015/2016 monitoring, data will be analyzed and marine turtle abundance will be compared between the pre -construction baseline and the current year's data for each individual transect and for the sites as a whole (all transects combined) for both the Treatment and Control sites. Data for green and loggerhead turtles will be analyzed and presented separately. This annual report will present methods, results and conclusions of the monitoring effort. Summary Spreadsheet: Upon completion of all field monitoring activities, an Excel spreadsheet tabulating sea turtle monitoring results, as required by FDEP Specific Condition No. 29, will be prepared and submitted to the County and FWC. 36 EXHIBIT B Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 Final Interpretive Report: Upon conclusion of data analyses for the 2015 nesting season, a draft interpretive report, including an assessment of project impacts, if any, will be submitted to the County. This assessment will be based on statistical and other comparisons of nesting and reproductive success between treatment and control areas. EAI will meet with the County to review and identify any changes warranted in the interpretive report. After such changes are made by EAI, a final draft of the report will be submitted to the County. Hardbottom Monitoring Hardbottom Monitoring Report: Following completion of the field survey effort, CSA will analyze the transect and quadrat data per FDEP Biological Monitoring Plan requirements and prepare a draft summary report. The report will include appropriate graphics/tables, statistical analyses of the collected data, comparisons to previous years' survey data, and an assessment of project -related impacts to hardbottom communities. The report will be provided in both hard copy and digital format. Data deliverables on portable hard drive will include frame - grabbed images from all transects, PointCount files and associated data, Excel spreadsheets of PointCount data, and Excel spreadsheets of in situ quadrat data. UMAM Analysis: A UMAM report will be provided to the County that will include qualitative descriptions of impacted communities and associated ecological functions, and quantitative estimates of the extent of impacts. The UMAM spreadsheets, in addition to supporting documentation, will be provided in hard copy and digital format to the County for review prior to submittal to FDEP The draft Hardbottom Moniotirng and UMAM reports will be provided to the County for distribution to a 3`d party for impartial review and comment. CSA and/or EAI will then coordinate with the County and 3rd party reviewer to identify and discuss any needed changes to the draft summary and UMAM reports. After such changes are made by CSA, EAI will forward the summary report to FDEP in partial fulfillment of permit conditions. 37 EXHIBIT C Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 PROJECT SCHEDULE a) 0 L], a) 0 a) 0 c0 'O i.. O 0 0 0 U a, 0 a) 0 a) 0 0 0 0. .1G 0 on 0 a) •=r- at L L > 3 o A-0 38 EXHIBIT C kn N on 0 w E-+ ettw M O ID 0 Co) '43 Delivery Date December 31, 2015 February 28, 2016 Within 60 days of completion of the final quarterly survey Content All nesting survey data and reproductive success data summarized in an Excel spreadsheet Final interpretive report including assessment of project effects on nesting and reproductive success Final interpretive report including assessment of project effects on sea turtle utilization of nearshore hardbottom habitat a> .0 et L at A FDEP Sea Turtle Monitoring Data Spreadsheet Sea Turtle Nesting Beach Year-end Report In -water Sea Turtle Monitoring Annual Report 39 EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT D Indian River County Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 405 JENSEN BEACH, FLORIDA 34958 FEIN: 61-1747043 COST PROPOSAL — March 9, 2015 PROJECT NAME: Indian River Co. Sector 3 Sea Turtle Monitoring — 2015 (EAI Project No. 15-339) CLIENT: Mr. James D. Gray, Jr. Coastal Engineer Indian River County Public Works 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 226-1344 * Email: jgray@ircgov.com PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Daily sea turtle monitoring and related permit -compliance monitoring along approximately 9.1 miles of beach from R-20 south to R-68 in Indian River County, Florida, as described in EAI's Scope of Work dated March 9, 2015. PROJECT DURATION: April 1, 2015 — February 28, 2016. COSTS: All services will be provided at fixed cost (lump sum), as itemized below. TASK DESCRIPTION CHARGE 1 Escarpment monitoring (April — September 2015) $3,405.00 2 Post -construction sea turtle monitoring, including data management and QA (April — September 2015) $86,902.00 3 Nest marking, monitoring, and reproductive success $22,176.00 4 Weekly breeding shorebird monitoring $1,810.00 5 In -water monitoring, including final summary report $11,405.00 6 Nearshore hardbottom surveys $73,689.00 Nearshore hardbottom summary report $68,871.00 Aerial imagery interpretation, ground truthing, and habitat mapping $14,787.00 Sub -total nearshore hardbottom monitoring & mapping (Sub -contracted service) $157,347.00 7 UMAM analysis, including report (Sub -contracted service) $6,457.00 8 FDEP permit -required sea turtle monitoring data spreadsheet $3,290.00 9 Final interpretive report to client assessing project effects on sea turtle nesting and reproductive success $4,672.00 10 Project management $2,419.00 TOTAL COST $299,883.00 40 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM CONSENT I'I' 11 TO: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator FROM: DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: rde< Stan Boling, AICP Community Devel e mei t Director Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: March 16, 2015 RE: Board Consideration to Authorize Staff to Apply for Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program Cost -Share Grants for Replacement of the Round Island Riverside Park Boardwalk and for Dock Restoration at the Archie Smith Fish House It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at the Board's regular meeting of March 24, 2015. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Each year, the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) awards cost -share grants to local governments through FIND's Waterways Assistance Program (WAP) for waterways improvement projects. Project types eligible for funding include public navigation, public waterway access facilities, public recreation, environmental education, and boating safety projects directly relating to waterways. The amount of funds available each year is tied to property tax assessment values. Last year, approximately $357,000 in WAP grant funds were available for local governments in Indian River County. A similar amount of funds is expected to be available for the coming fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 grant cycle. The application deadline for the FY2015-16 grant cycle is April 1, 2015. Staff is herein requesting that the Board consider authorizing staff to apply for FIND WAP cost -share funding grants for the following two projects for FY 2015-16: • Round Island Riverside Park Improvements/Repairs • Archie Smith Fish House "Phase I" Dock Restoration ANALYSIS Following are summaries of the proposed Round Island Riverside Improvements project and Archie Smith Fish House Phase I Dock Restoration project. 1 41 Round Island Riverside Park Improvements/Repairs The Round Island Riverside Park observation/fishing pier is in substantial need of repair. A recent cost estimate obtained from a qualified marine contractor indicates that repairs to the pier will cost approximately $90,000. Also in need of repair is the asphalt paving of the parking lot, boat ramp approach and access drive. The total cost to rebuild the pavement base and repave the parking area, boat ramp approach, and access drive is estimated to be approximately $188,000 (see Attachment 3). Of that amount, approximately $96,000, for repaving of the boat ramp/trailer area, is eligible for use of Florida Boating Improvement Funds. The remainder county match amount of $92,000 (i.e., the amount not covered by FIND grant funds or boating improvement funds) would need to be funded by other means, such as Secondary Roads (Fund 109). The following table provides a breakdown of estimated cost for the proposed Round Island Riverside Park improvements by project elements: Round Island Riverside Park Improvements FIND Waterways Assistance Program Project Project Elements Estimated Cost FIND Cost County Cost Replacement of observation/fishing boardwalk (380 linear feet, 2600 square feet) $90,000 $90,000 Boat ramp approach / boat trailer parking area, rebuild base/ repave (±4800 sq. yds.) $96,000 $96,000 (FBIF) Parking for kayakers and day users, rebuild base/repave (2500 sq. yds.) $50,000 $50,000 (SRF) Driveway access, rebuild base/repave (±2100 sq. yds.) $42,000 $42,000 (SRF) TOTAL $278,000 $90,000 $188,000 FBIF: Florida Boating Improvement Funds. SR: Secondary Roads Fund. Archie Smith Fish House "Phase I" Dock Restoration In 2014, Indian River County contracted an architectural and engineering firm (Atelier AEC) to develop restoration design plans for the historic Archie Smith Fish House, using a State historic resources cost - share grant. The restoration design project has been completed, and the County is now seeking grant funding for the restoration work. At staffs request, in October 2014, Atelier AEC provided staff with an estimate of probable cost for restoration of the Archie Smith site main building, icehouse, and dock (see Attachment 2). Atelier's estimated cost for the overall restoration is $880,806. For restoration of the dock (only), the estimated cost is $535,500 (including fees and contingencies). Because of the substantial cost of the overall restoration, staff suggests that the project be phased. Staff's proposal is that the County apply for "Phase I" FIND grant funding under the current application cycle for the dock restoration component (only), using Florida Boating Improvement Funds for the County's match. The following table provides a breakdown of estimated cost for the proposed Archie Smith Fish House Phase I Restoration by project elements: 2 F:\Community Development\Users\ROLAND\LAAC\Archie Smith Fish House\FIND grant app BCC Res staff rpt for 3-24-15.rtf 42 Archie Smith Fish House Phase I Dock Restorations FIND Waterways Assistance Program Project Project Elements Estimated Cost FIND Cost County Cost Reconstruct main dock, add floating dock kayak landing, and construct 4 boat slips (2,421 sq. ft.) $425,000 $212,500 $212,500 Fees and contingencies $25,500 $12,750 $12,750 Historic site architectural oversight $32,700 $16,350 $16,350 TOTAL $483,200 $241,600 $241,600 Funding As summarized herein, the proposed funding source for $96,000 of the Round Island Riverside Park project County match is proposed to come from Florida Boating Improvement Funds. The remainder of the match for the Round island project ($92,000) is proposed to be funded from the Secondary Roads Fund. For the Archie Smith Fish House Phase I project, the County's $241,600 cost -share match is proposed to be funded from the Florida Boating Improvement Fund. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to apply for Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program grants for the Round Island Riverside Park Improvements and Archie Smith Fish House Phase I Restoration projects described herein, using the Florida Boating Improvement Fund and Secondary Roads Fund for the County match as herein described. ATTACHMENTS 1. Drawing of the Archie Smith Fish House dock restoration proposal. 2. Atelier AEC Estimate of (overall) Probable Costs for the Archie Smith Fish House Restoration project. 3. Parks Division staff email with estimated cost of parking/paving improvements at Round Island Riverside Park. APPROVED: FOR: March 24, 2014 3 F:\Community Development\Users\ROLAND\LAAC\Archie Smith Fish House\FIND grant app BCC Res staff rpt for 3-24-15.rtf 43 I.R.County A s .roved Date Admin. ett 3/05 Legal] Budget Sii 00, Dept. ti r Risk Mgr. 3 F:\Community Development\Users\ROLAND\LAAC\Archie Smith Fish House\FIND grant app BCC Res staff rpt for 3-24-15.rtf 43 epuold 'ue13segag NOLLY O1S3a 3SfOH HSIU H11WS 31H3 IV pasodoJd SLinspc - Lipid a31S i11 1 If .F.t 4•.t II O ATTACHMENT 1 44 A'T[:LII:R kPl 11111,, 111:i 1' k,1`.11 til\t, lir,�l 11 t 11«D. Archie Smith Fish House Renovation Estimate of Probable Cost October 29, 2014 Cost of Gen Conditions Contingency Total Work and Fees (20%) (5%) Buildings** 248,100 49,620 14,886 312,606 House + Ice House 1654 sf © $150/sf Docks 425,000 85,000 25,500 535,500 Sub -Total 673,100 134,620 40,386 848,106 Construction Administration Fee 32,700 (Civil + Landscape not included) TOTAL 880,806 **Costs exclusive of exhibitry, displays and furniture. H:2014/1406/Admin/CostEstArchieSm ithRenovation.102914.doc ATTACHMENT 2 2709 S. MacDill Avenue Tampa, Florida 33629 813.831.3223 FL Reg. AA 0002431 E -Mail vsalaga®atelieraec.com 45 Roland Deblois From: Beth Powell Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:33 AM To: Michael Zito; Roland Deblois Cc: David Fleetwood Subject: Round Island Riverside Park - Repaving Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged I spoke with Jeff Hoffman with Road & Bridge. He went to Round Island to assess the condition of the asphalt. He said that the entire area really needs to be replaced. It's beyond being able to overlay it because of the numerous patches/potholes, alligator cracking and raveling. (Generally, these areas should be repaved before the condition deteriorates to the point it is now, which is the case currently on the Oceanside park which could simply be repaired with repaving/no rebuild currently needed.) Because of the condition of the pavement and the amount of traffic that area receives, he recommended a base rebuild (take out the asphalt, mix, regrade and inject with oil), then repave. The mixing and sub -grade work would take about 3 weeks and the repaving 1 week. The cost for the base rebuild is approx. $7.50/square yard and the cost for repaving at 2 1/2 inches (his recommendation due to the heavy use and high traffic Toad) is $12.50/square yard. I estimate the boat ramp/trailer area to be approx. 4800 square yards = Rebuild: $36,000 + Repaving: $60,000 = Total: $96,000 The parking for kayaks and day users is approx. 2500 square yards = Rebuild: $18,750 + Repaving: $31,250 = Total: $50,000 The driveway in/out is approx. 2100 square yards. = Rebuild: $15,750 + Repaving: $26,250 = Total: $42,000 Total: approx. 9400 sq. yards = Rebuild: $70,500 + Repaving: $117,500 = $188,000 This is the cost for a sub -contractor to do the work and would be a good cost estimate for the grant. beth Powell Conservation Lands Manager Indian }liver Countt� 5 500 77th Street Vero beach, IL 32967 772-226-187 www.ircgov.com/conservation Keep up to date with RC's Conservation Lands Program on Jacebook: www.facebook.com/ircConservation ATTACHMENT 3 "If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping with a mosquito." f -j.j-j. l +tk Dalai Lama 1 46 CONSENT ITEM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Stan Boling, AI Community Dev lop ent Director FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement DATE: March 16, 2015 RE: Preservation Pointes Property Owners Association's Request for Release of Certain Easements on Lots in Preservation Pointes Phases I and II (Timber Ridge P.R.D.) It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at the Board's regular meeting on March 24, 2015. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County has been petitioned by the Preservation Pointes Property Owners Association (POA), on behalf of lot owners in Preservation Pointes Phases I and II of Timber Ridge Planned Residential Development (PRD), for release of 10 -foot wide rear yard conservation easements on lots within Preservation Pointes. The POA is also requesting that the County release its upland conservation interest (only) in a 25 -foot "utility/conservation easement and 25 -foot PRD perimeter setback and 6 -foot opaque screening" area on lots along the northern boundary of Preservation Pointes. The purpose of the easements release request is to eliminate unnecessary use restrictions on privately owned platted lots in Preservation Pointes, in light of the fact that a common area preservation tract within the development substantially exceeds a 15% native upland set-aside requirement set forth in the County's land development regulations. Because the conservation easements requested for release are not needed to meet County conservation requirements or PRD requirements, the Board may release the subject easements. The Board is now to consider the POA's request. ANALYSIS Preservation Pointes Phases I and II of Timber Ridge PRD consists of approximately 9.41 acres, +3.9 acres of which are set-aside in a Preservation Tract. The Preservation Tract is a common area dedicated to the Preservation Pointes POA, subject to a conservation easement interest in favor of Indian River County and the St. Johns River Water Management District. The Preservation Tract consists of approximately ±2.48 acres of forested wetlands and +1.42 acres of uplands. The +1.42 acres of conserved uplands in the Preservation Tract represents ±25% of the pre -development native uplands (± 5.64 acres) estimated at the time of development (in the mid-1990s). In addition to the conserved uplands set-aside in the common Preservation Tract, 10 -foot rear yard conservation easements, with a combined area totaling approximately 0.64 acres, were established on 22 of 34 individual lots via the subdivision plat (see attached plats). Due to the narrow width of the rear yard easements, coupled with typical back yard residential use on the lots, there is currently little or no upland habitat in the subject lot easements. Revisions to Upland Set -Aside Requirements Indian River County initially adopted its native upland set-aside requirements in September 1990. At that time, native upland conservation areas were not required to be set-aside as common tracts and could be established as easements on private platted lots. Also at that time, there was no minimum dimension (e.g., 50' minimum width) specified for such easements. In 2006 (several years after Preservation Pointes was platted), the County revised its upland set-aside regulations to require that upland set -asides have horizontal dimensions of no less than 50 feet, and that such set -asides be conserved as common areas and not as easements on private platted lots. The reasons for those changes were that narrow strips (e.g., 10 -foot widths) have minimal upland preservation value, and that upland set -asides on common tracts are less susceptible to encroachments from residential back yard uses than easements on private lots, whether or not such encroachments are inadvertent or intentional. In addition to the POA's request for release of the 10 -foot conservation easements on the lots, the POA is requesting that the County release its conservation interest (only) in a 25 -foot "utility/conservation easement and 25 -foot PRD perimeter setback and 6 -foot opaque screening" area on lots along the northern boundary of Preservation Pointes. Specific to that easement, staff believes it is appropriate for the County to release its conservation interest (only) in the easement, but retain its interest in the easement pertaining to utilities, PRD perimeter setback and opaque screening. Since the common Preservation Tract referenced in this memorandum amply meets the county's upland set-aside requirements (i.e., 25% vs. a required 15%), and because the easements (and easement interest) requested for release have little or no conservation value, staff's position that the requested conservation easement releases would have no adverse impact to the public interest, to property within Preservation Pointes, or to adjacent properties. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the attached resolution, approve release of the conservation easement interests described in the resolution. ATTACHMENTS 1. Map(s) depicting easements proposed for release. 2. Proposed County Resolution Releasing Easement. APPROVED: FOR: March 24 2015 BY: QJ? LR Oounty App Date Ad in. Jf9i1� Legal t j -11- 1 S Budget (Lrj 31,E Dept. /4 Risk Mgr. --'- ease.bccmemo proj./appl. no. 92080040/73612 48 — < Wy a- 9 0 0 0 tL 1"1 } 2 2 D W0 ''^^ 0 V/ Ir Q W > T i Z Q a▪ _ 3 Z 05 ci 012. W i:W ro Z li.l W 0 ▪ CD z a Cr 2 CC D Zm• 8 0 M • M H a It N Q 2 O ✓ Cr N W o W w A/ N a. 0 2 0 F S a SHEET 2 OF 2 3EC38DV 031iVHNC SB'S6S 3.2S.15.00 �2. $W 28 syr rid IS8Y €5Ei 888"g 88i ( 68813, 8 _ '�W • LU i 6OiW6 J O■ _ zaf> 8 8 8 8 8 8 c 8 \\ ., g .\ .08 0 rr' r 'A,' Na l.01 t „i. -7 •i°810 y --,8 —�. •--, s� 361.71 I Lair' ——f.16 TrS4 ( I OOO22•w '848 84 P C5 '`8d 'ci ti'd D.•JiSt:1i 8 S 3eOld XOd na 8F Aga w; Wa w� 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a S 8 8 8 2 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 LINE TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT DOCKET N0. cal 1 9 -7 (✓_� OD LIJ E— Z 0 PRESERVATION w 0 0 cc w (n 0 PRESERVATION POINTES REPLAT OF PARCEL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS IN SECTION 24 . TOWNSHIP PLAT BOOK z R RIVER COUNTY RANGE 39 EAST 33 SOUTH FEBRUARY a Z O r W O N'0 O N C •a ✓ N - ZW 00 N � z 00 WY 00 0 w - 00. � swwssww�wwlw WwssssP r N . . ONO. O •-. NO f . O n H y= N O N Y A Y N N O N n h N Z Z 2 2 Z Z 2 2 Z •n In •n •n N •n •n N •n ZV o10'lOn T�p 6 Y O NUI hN NMIp Phn10V annn /Iry N•n•Ih 5 O O n N n n O` r p N 2 2 n O N - O NN --•p •n On OOo p0-Nnn N= W \ V 8518`Ob2.882-*Ovn 112i: O O n- O O 0 U O N vI O n i I�il vNina rvn-NnNN-nrvNn'n z �pn nn r n _;:;,11P, ..8.8.8.8.2.8.8.8.8.20000 t O NnN rt y 10 S W wss s!. N O ' O 2• w -•- O O N n O �- b y O N N f N V I 2 O n O n J> r Y Y n- C n n `J` w • i i..;.n n4, Ory --000 <Oinr YY Nn - is Q r nnrl it in n•IY�inP' w N••n^-- n--- o W N< F W - Y Y VI rv• - N MI N- n .7 N n m Z 2 Z N • n • n • n Z yI n . d il ii 'in W4 r> >Y 0-N9YYOn0 1-04 WI - suW. `VOnpp 2 YO W�uUUUVUUVUUUUUuUUUUU J JJJJJJJJr-I WW WJ 2. sY J U ¢O ~;2 V 4-0 67.-- -_ 0Mra • 00-zzo --0 i$ 9 'z` rrYm yW zz im Lty\ p_ ...- .0 uwsetNVr ....J aad € ;.122 •er N 89.56'38"E 3 .9f SLZ 11 1 30Vd 01 )ZOOS 1Vld 3SVH6 S3JNIO0 NOIlVAi13S3Ld ATTACHMENT 1 N`:, a 2a a it 0 50 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ON LOTS IN PRESERVATION POINTES PHASE I AND PRESERVATION POINTES PHASE II WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in conservation easements on lots in Preservation Pointes Phase I and Preservation Pointes Phase II; and WHEREAS, the retention of the easements, or portions thereof, as described below, serves no public purpose; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DOES HEREBY RELEASE and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may have in the following described easements: the 10 foot conservation easements of Lots 5-9, Lots 13-18, and Parcel 1, Preservation Pointes Phase I, as depicted on the plat of Preservation Pointes Phase 1, recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 1 -IA, of the public records of Indian River County; and the 10 foot conservation easements of Lots 19-23 and Lots 27-34, Preservation Pointes Phase II, as depicted on the plat of Preservation Pointes Phase II, recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 41-41A, of the public records of Indian River County. MOREOVER, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEREBY DOES RELEASE its conservation interest (only), but retains all other right, title and interest that it may have, in the following described easements: the north 25' utility/conservation easement of Lots 9-13 and Parcel 1, as depicted on the plat of Preservation Pointes Phase I, recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 1-1A, of the public records of Indian River County; and the north 25' utility/conservation easement of Lots 23-27, as depicted on the plat of Preservation Pointes Phase II, recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 41-41A, of the public records of Indian River County. This release of easements is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted on the day of 2015, by the following vote: Chairman Wesley S. Davis Vice -Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2015. ATTACHMENT 2 51 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Wesley S. Davis, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FARM: County Attorney ease.bccdoc proj/apl. no. 92080040/73612 Cc: Applicant: PRESERVATION POINTES POA 580 WEST POINTE CT SW VERO BEACH, FL 32962 52 Consent Agenda item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: March 11, 2015 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Aw Subject: Final Pay to MBV for WO No.5-South County RO Facility Storage & Piping Tank Modifications DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On February 19th, 2013, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Work Order No. 5 for a lump sum amount of $16,800.00 with Moia Bowles Villamizar & Associates (MBV) to provide professional services for the design and construction observation of the interconnecting operating system project between the South and North RO plants. On December 17, 2013, Addendum No.1 was issued to MBV for a lump sum amount of $1,500.00 to provide more details in the specifications and construction plans on the electrical components of the project. Addendum No.2 was issued to MBV on September 9th, 2014 for a lump sum amount of $3,750.00 to provide plan revisions to add a dry conduit and a pull box for future fiber and additional time for construction oversight. ANALYSIS: Now that the construction has been completed satisfactorily, on time and under budget MBV is requesting final payment. To date, MBV has been paid $19,774.99. Payment in the amount of $2,305.01 as final pay will complete the County's obligation to the consultant. FUNDING: Funds for this project will be derived from the R & R budget in the Operating fund. The operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer sales. Description South RO Piping/Storage Tank Modification Account No. 47123536-044699-13507 Amount D1 :i, 0'.5', 0/ F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering \ WATER \ TP - South RO\S. RO Storage Tank Interconnect -UCP 4112\Admin\Final Pay to WO.5 MBV.doc 53 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the BCC approve Final Pay to MBV Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $2,305.01. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Invoice No 15-0179 from MBV. APPROVED FOR AGENDA: N (i)1::))(/ By: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Mzur Date Indian River Co. Appro ed Date Administration S :7 J?1 % , Legal //f 3 Budget 1 to Utilities 3 -(1.- Utilities -Finance i L 3-11e1( 54 ENGINEERING, INC. MOIA BOWLES VILLAMIZAR & ASSOCIATES 1835 20th Street • Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone: 772.569.0035 • Fax: 772.778.3617 RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2015 1 Y; To: Mr. Terry Southard Indian River County Utilities Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach FL 32960 INVOICE Invoice Date Invoice Num Feb 10, 2015 15-0179 Billing To Jan 30, 2015 Page 1 of 1 For professional services rendered on the above referenced project for the period ending January 30, 2015 Charges or payments made after closing date are not reflected in this invoice. Please include invoice number with all payments. A service charge of 1.5% per month will be billed for late payments. All major Credit Cards accepted. Processing fees may apply. Project ID Project Name Contract Amount % Complete Previously Billed Amount Due 12-276: IRC South Reverse Osmosis $22,050.00 100.00 $20,024.99 $2,025.01 Plant -Storage Tank Modif Current Period Charges: Total Amount Due Including This Invoice: Account Summary I Services BTD I Expenses BTD I Billed To Date I Paid To Date Late Fees Owed I Balance Due I$ 21,800.00 I $ 250.00 I $ 22,050.00 1 $ 20,024.99 $ 0.00 I $ 2,025.01 If you have reason to believe this billing is incorrect please notify us via e-mail; billing@mbveng.com $2,025.01 $ 2,025.01 To avoid late fees pay before Due Date: 3/12/2015 Inv Num Inv Date Bill Amt Pay Date Retainer +l- 15-0179 02/10/2015 $2,025.01 Amt Paid Inv Balance Late Fee Late Fee Paid $2,025.01 IRC South Reverse Osmosis Plant -Storage Tank Modif $0.00 $0.00 $2,025.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,025.01 50.00 $0.00 Project Balance: $ 2,025.01 42�f7 - JL(q 13s-07 03 aq aois K t4()WY4 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Prepared by the Finance Department of the Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller March 24, 2015 Audit Completion • County's annual audit by Rehmann Robson CPA audit firm completed March 4, 2015 -last year of the contract • Unmodified "clean" opinion on County and Officers. • No findings or comments for the Board and two findings for the Sheriff's Office -response is included in CAFR • Includes audit of all governmental and enterprise funds, internal controls, grant and bond compliance County Overview • The County -level financial statements (located in the Financial Section of the CAFR) include the BOCC and all five constitutional officers. • Individual statements are included in the Auditor General section of the CAFR. County Level Financial Statements Board of County Commissioners Clerk of Court and Comptroller Property Appraiser Sheriff Supervisor of Elections Tax Collector 553 County Net Position (in millions) Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Current and other assets $ 221.0 $ 223.8 $ 107.5 $ 111.1 $ 328.5 $ 334.9 Capital assets 549.1 540.9 248.9 251.3 798.0 792.2 Total assets 770.1 764.7 356.4 362.4 1,126.5 1,127.1 Deferred outflows of resources Total deferred outflows 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 Long-term liabilities 56.3 60.7 51.8 54.9 108.1 115.6 Other liabilities 10.0 12.1 6.7 9.7 16.7 21.8 Total liabilities 66.3 72.8 58.5 64.6 124.8 137.4 Net position: Net investment in capital assets 514.7 502.8 211.7 210.7 726.4 713.5 Restricted 116.2 117.3 - 20.9 116.2 138.2 Unrestricted 72.9 71.8 88.4 68.7 161.3 140.5 Total net position $ 703.8 $ 691.9 $ 300.1 $ 300.3 $ 1,003.9 $ 992.2 55 L 4 Net Position Components Indian River County Net Position (In millions) September 30, 2013 and 2014 net investment in capital assets restricted unrestricted y 0 200 400 600 800 2013 ■ 2014 County Change in Net Position Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services Operating grants/contributions Capital grants/contributions General revenues: Property taxes Sales taxes Franchise fees Other Total revenues Expenses: General government Public safety Physical environment Transportation Economic environment Human services Culture/recreation Court related Interest and fiscal charges Water and sewer Solid waste Golf course Building Total expenses Increase (decrease) in net position before transfers Transfers Increase (decrease) in net position Net position - October 1, 2013 Adjustments to net position Net position - September 30, 2014 Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Total 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 $ 23.0 $ 18.2 $ 45.3 $ 43.6 $ 68.3 $ 61.8 22.2 26.9 - 22.2 26.9 7.5 6.7 5.0 4.7 12.5 11.4 72.7 67.0 21.9 21.0 9.3 8.8 3.0 3.5 159.6 152.1 72.7 67.0 - 21.9 21.0 9.3 8.8 0.4 0.5 3.4 4.0 50.7 48.8 210.3 200.9 23.0 20.6 - 23.0 20.6 66.9 66.2 - 66.9 66.2 1.0 1.9 - 1.0 1.9 23.6 26.3 - 23.6 26.3 1.1 2.5 - 1.1 2.5 7.1 6.8 - 7.1 6.8 16.6 19.4 - - 16.6 19.4 6.4 5.8 - - 6.4 5.8 1.9 2.1 - - 1.9 2.1 35.8 33.8 35.8 33.8 - 10.8 10.4 10.8 10.4 - 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.5 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.6 147.6 151.6 51.0 48.3 198.6 199.9 12.0 0.5 (0.3) 0.5 11.7 1.0 (0.04) - 0.04 - - - 11.9 0.5 (0.2) 0.5 11.7 1.0 691.9 706.9 300.3 299.8 992.2 1,006.7 (15.5) - - (15.5) $ 703.8 $ 691.9 $ 300.1 $ 300.3 $ 1,003.9 $ 992.2 Review of Revenues By Source 80 70 60 - 50 40 30 - 20 - 10 0 Revenues By Source (In Millions) Governmental Activities Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014 42,c tz,cfb L Qua `b ( c�a FY 2013 ■ FY 2014 Review of Expenditures 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Expenditures By Function (In Millions) Governmental Activities Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014 ec. c• c:\ e, c• c. c‘ • 'c' Ike q\e * 0 cc` 0 4 ,,ec".4‘(' ,cP , c<" ) c• ic-I) ct e, + g ..a. 4c ,(• eNei (P - No c;Z rt, •Sc e c(` .k..e <I) •Z`\ e, 0 C, CP •;2' <9 Pi FY 2013 II FY 2014 55R --g General Fund Comparison REVENUES Taxes Permits, fees and special assessments Intergovernmental Charges for services Judgments, fines and forfeits Interest Miscellaneous Total revenues EXPENDITURES General government Public safety Physical environment Transportation Economic environment Human services Culture/recreation Court related Total expenditures Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balances at beginning of year Fund balances at end of year FY 2014 $ 49,346,756 9,528,916 16,514,498 10,940,954 459,812 197,947 2,187,650 89,176,533 18,686,324 40,455,836 261,593 4,031,930 404,504 3,494,670 8,172,881 5,737,238 FY 2013 $ 46,721,964 9,010,223 16,747,325 8,750,267 345,320 181,776 996,578 82,753,453 17,454,089 39,425,892 235,111 4,685,702 368,786 3,625,268 7,972,993 5,262,432 81,244,976 79,030,273 7,931,557 3,723,180 1,704,663 1,706,554 (7,837,943) (9,886,193) (6,133,280) (8,179,639) 1,798,277 (4,456,459) 49,880,588 54,337,047 $ 51,678,865 $ 49,880,588 Debt Update Outstanding Bond Issues (In millions) 0 Limited GO, Series Water & Sewer, Water & Sewer, Spring Training, 2006 Series 2009 Series 2005 Series 2001 FY 2013 ■ FY 2014 ,s6A 10 Utility Debt Coverage Ratio 2012 2013 2014 Uniform Charges Water sales $ 13,621,878 $ 13,667,115 $ 14,059,231 Wastewater sales 12,515,394 12,546,429 12,879,006 Other 1,727,411 1,763,426 2,025,378 Total uniform charges 27,864,683 27,976,970 28,963,615 Septage/Sludge 373,616 426,634 478,555 Surcharges 246,298 246,363 242,073 Interest earnings 315,377 239,270 258,741 1996 Special assessments 75,037 69,757 22,091 Gross revenues 28,875,011 28,958,994 29,965,075 Less: Direct expenses Net revenues available for debt service 15,657,085 15,217,294 16,040,433 $ 13,217,926 $ 13,741,700 $ 13,924,642 Annual debt service Principal $ 3,090,000 $ 3,205,000 $ 3,350,000 Interest 2,193,450 2,080,950 1,937,450 Total debt service payment $ 5,283,450 $ 5,285,950 $ 5,287,450 Debt service coverage 2.50x 2.60x 2.63X GA -11 Initiatives • Continue to work on increasing the number of electronic payments and reducing the amount of paper. • Link placed on Board's website for Board and Clerk's unclaimed property (checks). • Hoping to modernize the official documents of the Board. We have a proposal and are researching requirements. • The County has received the Certificate of Achievement For Excellence in Financial Reporting for 31 consecutive years. 55 -1 Thank you • Thank you to the Finance Department staff, as well as the staffs of the Board and Constitutional officers for all their assistance in preparation of this report • Questions? INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM J)( RH.i(' in:1Riy ; st'I:( LU. FACIA' I'10\ l SI: 01 .%SI -.at i))ci.ki. TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Stan Boling, AI ' , ommunity Developmeptt Director THROUGH: John W. McCoy, AICP; Chief, Current Development FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ryan Sweeney; Senior Planner, Current Development. March 12, 2015 Faith Baptist Church, Inc. of Vero Beach, Fla.'s Request for Special Exception Use Approval for a Modular Office Addition [AA -14-11-133 / 2002030042 - 73140] It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 24, 2015. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS Chris Crawford, AIA architect has submitted an application for special exception use approval on behalf of Faith Baptist Church, Inc. of Vero Beach, Fla. to add a 1,307 square foot (sq. ft.) modular office building and 13 stabilized grass parking spaces to the existing church site located at 7966 20th Street (SR 60). The subject site is zoned RS -6, a zoning district in which special exception use approval is required for places of worship, including building expansions of more than 10%. Because the proposed modular office building exceeds the 10% threshold, special exception review and approval is required. In this case, the applicant has applied for concurrent administrative approval (AA) and special exception use approval. Consistent with the County land development regulations (LDRs), staffhas approved the administrative approval application subject to Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approval of the special exception use request. Pursuant to Section 971.05 of the LDRs, the Board is to consider the appropriateness of the requested expansion for the subject site and compatibility of the expansion with the surrounding area. The Board is now to consider the special exception use request, and is to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the use request. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: At its meeting of February 26, 2015, the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) voted 5-0 to recommend that the BCC approve the special exception use request with staffrecommended conditions (see attachment 3). F:\Community Development\CurDev\BCC\2015 BCC\FaithBaptistSPSE(AA-14-11-133).docx 1 56 ANALYSIS 1. Size of Parcel: 2.46 Acres 2. Zoning Classification: RS -6, Residential Single -Family (up to 6 units/acre) 3. Land Use Designation: M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre) 4. Building Area: Existing: 6,988 sq. ft. Proposed Modular Office: 1,307 sq. ft. Total: 8,295 sq. ft. Note: The existing building area includes an 864 sq. ft. storage shed, which will remain. 5. Open Space: Required: 30.0% Proposed: 68.7% 6. Traffic Circulation and Impacts: The subject site has an existing two-way driveway on 20th Street (SR 60). No changes are proposed to the existing driveway connection. Due to the low trip generation associated with the proposed addition, no traffic impact study was required for this project, and no off-site traffic improvements are required or proposed. Public Works has approved the internal circulation and the use of 13 additional stabilized parking spaces. 7. Off -Street Parking: Required: 56 spaces (based on pre-existing sanctuary seating) Existing: 43 spaces (grandfathered -in) Proposed: 56 spaces (adding 13 stabilized grass spaces) Note: As an infrequent use, stabilized parking is allowed for places of worship and that allowance applies to the proposed project. The current church facility was built in 1978 and has a total of 43 existing parking spaces. Under current code, 56 spaces would be required based on sanctuary seating (168 seats); however, the existing facility parking is grandfathered -in. As part of the subject project, the applicant is voluntarily proposing to add 13 stabilized grass parking spaces in order to meet the current code minimum required number of parking spaces. No increase in sanctuary space or seating is proposed. 8. Landscape Plan: The proposed landscape plan provides a Type `B' buffer around the perimeters of the project's areas of development. Specifically, buffering will be provided along the north and west property lines adjacent to the proposed modular office, and along the east property line adjacent to the proposed additional parking area. As proposed, both project areas of development will be brought up to current code requirements. Because this proposal does not constitute a major site plan, the entire site is not required to be brought into full compliance with current code, including landscaping requirements. 9. Stormwater Management: Public Works reviewed the existing stormwater system, indicated that no additional stormwater improvements are required, and approved the proposed project. 10. Utilities: The site is currently served by County water and has an existing septic system. The Health Department has determined that the proposed modular office addition will not generate significant additional wastewater volumes and can be accommodated by the existing septic F:\C'ommunity Development\CurDev\BCC\2015 BCC \FaithBaptistSPSE(AA-14-11-133 ).docx 2 57 system. Utility Services has determined that the project does not exceed a threshold that requires connection to sewer service. Utility Services and the Health Department have approved the proposed plans, including use of the existing septic system. 11. Environmental Issues: The site's only environmental issue is the presence of several existing oak trees and sabal palm trees. No mitigation will be required as all existing trees will either be preserved or relocated on-site. 12. SR 60 Corridor Requirements: The SR 60 Corridor criteria apply to the modular office building, and the modular office building has been designed to meet the corridor plan criteria. The proposed roof material is 5-V crimp aluminum; however, the applicant has requested an option to utilize an asphalt/fiberglass shingle -style roof material in order to match the roof material of the existing church. The corridor regulations allow approval of asphalt/fiberglass shingles on residentially designated sites such as the subject site. Staff supports the request for an optional asphalt/fiberglass shingle -style roof material, as long as dimensional asphalt/fiberglass shingles are used. 13. Specific Land Use Criteria: Pursuant to LDR section 971.28(5), the following criteria for places of worship apply to this project: 1. No building or structure shall be located closer than thirty (30) feet to any property line abutting a residential use or residentially designated property; Note: The proposed modular office building is located a minimum of 46' from all property lines. 2. Access shall be from a major thoroughfare unless otherwise approved by the public works department; Note: The site has an existing two-way driveway on a major thoroughfare (20th Street/SR 60). 3. Any accessory residential use, day care facility or school upon the premises shall provide such additional lot area as required for such use by this section and shall further be subject to all conditions set forth by the reviewing procedures and standards for that particular use. Accessory residential uses may include covenants, monasteries, rectories or parsonages as required by these regulations; Any accessory residential use, day care facility or school upon the premises shall provide such additional lot area as required for such use by this section and shall further be subject to all conditions set forth by the reviewing procedures and standards for that particular use. Accessory residential uses may include covenants, monasteries, rectories or parsonages as required by these regulations; Note: The applicant is not seeking approval of any residential use, daycare, or school at this facility, and no such use will be authorized under the subject application. 4. A Type "B" buffer shall be provided along all property boundaries where the facility is located adjacent to a single-family residentially zoned property. A Type "C" buffer shall be provided along all property boundaries when the facility is located adjacent to a multiple -family residentially zoned property or agriculturally zoned F:\Community Development\CurDev\BCC\2015 BCC\FaithBaptistSPSE(AA-14-11-133).docx 3 58 property having a residential land use designation. a. The board of county commissioners may waive or reduce the buffer requirements where the place of worship is located next to an existing cemetery, place of worship, child care facility, community center, or school. Consideration shall be given to security, noise, and visual impacts. Where a waiver or a buffer reduction is granted, normal perimeter landscaping requirements shall apply, and alternative requirements (such as fencing) may be required. Note: A Type "B" buffer will be provided between the areas of development and the adjacent single-family residentially zoned properties. 14. Concurrency: As required under the County's concurrency regulations, the applicant has applied for and obtained a conditional concurrency certificate for the project. In accordance with County concurrency regulations, the applicant will be required to obtain a final concurrency certificate prior to issuance of a building permit. 15. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Single -Family / RS -6 East: Single -Family / RS -6 South: 20th Street (SR 60), Multiple -Family, Indian River Citrus League / RM -6, A-1 West: Single -Family / RS -6 All conditions recommended by staff have been accepted by the applicant. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval for the Faith Baptist Church modular office addition with the following conditions: 1. The modular office shall have either a 5-V crimp metal roof or a dimensional asphalt/fiberglass shingle roof. 2. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall install all required landscaping improvements, as shown on the project landscape plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application 2. Location Map 3. Excerpt from Unapproved February 26, 2015 PZC Minutes 4. Site Plan (with Partial Building Elevations) APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: FOR: March 24 2015 BY:L (4 Indian River Co. Ap • roved Date Admin. E;i .3/19/1 Legal j. a Budget Lu 77,5-- 5 Dept. I J Risk Mgr. - �"— F:\C. munity Development\CurDev\BCC\2015 BCC\FaithBaptistSPSE(AA-I4-11-133).docx 4 59 SPECIAL EXCEPTION SITE PLAN (SPSE) APPLICATION FORM PROJECT NAME (Please Print): PROPOSED PROJECT USE 0-41-tigC 1, OJ` l CL — P /1-b S C—CALE-Derall CORRESPONDING PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE PROJECT NAME AND CDPLUS ASSIGNED FILE NUMBER (IF ANY): PROJECT#: 9 9'N -OS ,0 O 0 O 14' 2-, (4*- j I _I —1.1-133 OWNER: (PLEASE PRINT) t 14- BA-piiS-t-Q UOn)" )1\1 NAME /CI 0 QQ ADDRESS \V-6 (04 AGENT (PLEASE PRINT) NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP 6(01-114311) PHONE NUMBER ke,il, b i h o v be.L(5bt -r . net EMAIL ADDS t< t NC CONTACT PERSON PHONE NUMBER EMAIL ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR ENT PROJECT: (PLEASE PRINT) Gas-�.�'W�.�. NAME ADDRESS U6? -0 2.9 to CITY, STATE, ZIP - j2t2 PHONE NUMBER(s) C Pert C 0-1- c- 8 nns h► Cow, EMAIL ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON PROJECT' SURVEYOR: (PLEASE PRINT) NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER(s) EMAIL ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON 1801 276 Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 F:CComrnunity DevclopmerA tisaACerDeviApplkaiwns\spa *pp only.ni Revised January 2011e I of 3 ATTACHMENT 1 60 •DOES THE REQUEST INCLUDE A CONCEPTUAL P AN ONLY OR A CONCEPTUAL AND "FINAL* SITE PLAN?: *AMOUNT OF NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: (SO.FT.) • SITE ADDRESS: --Al2.67 26- \I $ 1¢ ((2 *SITE TAX PARCEL ID#(s): 33 -58 - 01- 00003 - 6002. - dojo o •IS ALL OR A PORTION OF PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ADDRESSED IN A PRE -APP CONFERENCE? YES NO •FLOOD ZONE: X ZONING: RS — (O FLUE: *TOTAL (GROSS) ACREAGE OF PARCEL: *AREA OF DEVELOPMENT (NET) ACREAGE: • 4 (C Ac - *PROPOSED CHANGES TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT (IF APPLICABLE): A. NUMBER OF UNITS: FROM TO B. DENSITY: FROM UNITS PER ACRE TO UNITS PER ACRE *CHANGE IN USES BY SQUARE FEET GROSS BUILDING AREA USE: FROM SO.FT.OF (USE) TO SO. FT. OF (USE) COMMENTS: Mc) U1LVI1.1(9- Po OM m SY 1S11►L- C1 I2C_ • 13 67 s• SI LL6 (,S tosurp►►l�-, � Avb ineilkL ►•Ir **PLEASE COMPLETE COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST ON NEXT PAGE** 1803 27th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 F:\Community Devclopmcnt\UeeraCurDev\Applicarionalipae app onlystf Revieod January 2011 ATTACHMENT 1 Put 2of3 61 SPECIAL EXCEPTION SITE PLAN APPLICATION SUBMISSION CHECKLIST MATERIAL (note N/A where applicable) YES 1. EVIDENCE OF PRE -APP CONFERENCE IF PROJECT OVER 20 UNITS OR 40,000 SQ. FT. NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE rd. gie i y 2. Fee: Administrative Approval $200.00 Minor $650.00 Major < or = 5 acres: > 5 but < 10 acres: = or > 10 acres: $1000.00 $1200.00 $1400.00 Special Exception Use fees required in addition to above site plan fees: $975.00 less than 40 acres $1075.00 40 - 100 acres $1275.00 over 100 acres +$ 50.00 for each additional 25 acres over 100 acres 3. Completed Application Form, and if pre -app conference already held, then a pre -application conference discrepancy letter response or summary of plan revisions 4. Ten (10) Copies of the Site Plan 5. Two (2) Sealed Site Surveys 6. Two (2) aerials of site with project overlaid, showing surrounding 200 feet 7. Two (2) Copies of the Owner's Deed 8. Letter of Authorization (if applicant is not owner) 9. One (1) Copy of the Drainage Report 10. Completed Tree Removal Permit Application OR Signed Exemption Form OR Noted as will apply 10 days prior to site plan release 11. Completed Land Clearing Permit Application OR Signed Exemption Form OR Noted as will apply 10 days prior to site plan release 12. Three (3) sets signed, conceptual floor plans and elevations prepared by architect or engineer (when project is required by Florida law to have such architectural or engineering drawings) ,z 13. Environmental Survey if all or portion of project in environmentally sensitive are 14. Concurrency Application or Acknowledgement Form t/ 15. Written statement and photograph of posted sign (Needed if Planning & Zoning approval required) 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960AiACHMENT F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Applications\spse app only.rtf Revised January 2011 1 NO 5lak Page 3 of 3 / f"1 hi NE4-83 0 0 0 0 8 kt) cvNN - g s— 3 Ri6i 4.) r— anuaAv tp6L q108 1'4 HDITS3 C9 o 33380100001000-000001 1 33380100001000000001.0 33380100001000000002 0 Q , 1 0 8 fi ONV 8 Z I CD . CC L 1 S i — ( . 0 3. r W , LTI Ill , 0 0 I 0, CU /V ONZ8 J 33380100001012000004.0 0 00 8 ••• 0 0 A E u 8 0 0 The secretary administered the testimonial oath to those present who wished to speak at tonight's meeting on this matter. Mr. Ryan Sweeney, IRC Senior Planner, reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated February 16, 2015 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. He noted Item #4 of staff's recommendation should read "Prior to or via final plat approval for each phase", so the applicant could do the dedications via the final plat. ON MOTION BY Dr. Day, SECONDED BY Ms. Caldarone, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to grant preliminary plat approval for Bent Pine Preserve with the conditions recommended by staff. Public Hearings Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: A. Faith Baptist Church: Request for special exception use approval for a modular office and stabilized parking addition. Faith Baptist Church, Inc., of Vero Beach, Owner. Chris Crawford, AIA, Agent. Located at 7966 20th Street. RS -6, Residential Single -Family (up to 6 units/acre). Land Use Designation: M-1, Medium Density Residential -1 (up to 6 units/acres). (AA -14-11-133 / 2002030042- 73140) [Quasi -Judicial] Chairman Polackwich asked the Commissioners to reveal any ex -parte communication with the applicant or any conflict that would not allow them to make an unbiased decision. Mr. Emmons stated the agent in this application was the architect for his bathroom remodel; however it would not impact his ability to make a decision. Chairman Polackwich opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. The secretary administered the testimonial oath to those present who wished to speak at tonight's meeting on this matter. Mr. Sweeney reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated February 16, 2015 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. PZC/Unapproved 3 February 26, 2015 F:\BCC\All Committees\P&Z\2015 — AGENDAS & MINUTES\P&Z-02-26-15.doc ATTACHMENT 3 64 Mr. Emmons asked if stabilized grass parking meant parking on the lawn. Mr. Sweeney explained it was a grass surface with additional parking stops that had been evaluated to withstand light use in overflow situations. Dr. Day wondered if the two parking spaces that were not marked "C" on Attachment #3 of the backup were for handicapped parking. Mr. Sweeney responded they were standard sized parking spaces and the remaining 11 were compact spaces. Chairman Polackwich asked if there had been any objections from residents on the west side of the project. Mr. Sweeney confirmed notices had been sent and a sign posted and there had been no inquiries whatsoever. Chairman Polackwich closed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. ON MOTION BY Mr. Emmons, SECONDED BY Dr. Day, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval for the modular office addition with the conditions recommended by staff. Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: A. Consideration of County -initiated Amendments to Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Chapter 902 (Administrative Mechanisms) to Grant the Planning and Zoning Commission the Powers of the Board of Adjustment [Legislative] Chairman Polackwich opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. Mr. Stan Boling, IRC Community Development Director, reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated February 2, 2015 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. He explained the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) membership had dwindled over the years and currently there were only two members out of the required five, which meant there was no quorum. He clarified staff had proposed the PZC would act as the BZA and the present BZA would be dissolved. Dr. Day observed the Analysis section of Mr. Boling's report stated the LDRs were changed to allow staff -level variances and determinations of legal non -conformity for minor setback encroachments for structures constructed prior PZC/Unapproved 4 February 26, 2015 F:\BCC\AII Committees\P&Z\2015 — AGENDAS & MINUTES\P&Z-02-26-15.doc ATTACHMENT 3 so ..0•40. 0 114 4000$0%.-14100 f0500.21 9,000 - T -I- f - 10/0101(.0()1()101(j101010' 1111111111!I II Ct • iTi J 71 ATTACHMENT 1— LLI L4J (1) 0 CN tr) N 66 d y aJ �CJ 4-1 CI a cu o711 Ct 014 A4 IOR 3-aq -aO5 'V1 V1 I) U 0 0 .r..4 +44 a) 0 W .r U 4) > Special Exception Use — Specific land use criteria — Appropriateness and compatibility of the requested cd) — Two public hearings ➢ The BCC to: — Approve request — Approve request with conditions N — Deny request 0 o a N anuaw tp6i, AV H108 anuaw wog 3338010000100000001.0 3338010000 100 5030002.0 (§) (STATE ROAD 60) Hal 1 a A I 1:1 1.4 LJ LJ ()LDE BEDRJER) cr Fri JL _r - 08 NOM/2d /V ONZ8 -J fr) Wig 3 4� r T r 20th Street / SR 60 1- w w L 0 F- 0 c0 CO Cr) 'rte 111 allIC11111111,-- am aNa111111//0/0/01 OM nn NM I ON 011 11 ral IM 171 111MN tut ,tcg ct C , \\%.\\A. f;1 0 1 J 20th Street / SR 60 1- w w F- 0 tO ccs rn n Additional Grass Parking Ati UN moi;{ .121 OM ''WC /. HMI= T N 20th Street / SR 60 H W W 2 H 0 CN CO CP f` PZC Recommendation o O v1 N .+40� 8 U• /T.6411 .,_.., Oct 1 U (I) Ca e-1 4J 7S44L O O 1) � U C A 00 66 g co E 1) 0-4 0 1 ;._, 0 cA cA -4;4 cu v -c -il ct ci) — . — Ct U Eci) tiTZ1 V E Aa' . 54 Ute1 O CA U cn 77: 5O 0-4 ct ,(i) ...dct O ci)' rz4c)to .o a) a) CI) a) CD 4) O A A A - 9 Staff Recommendation T -c;' ,,--5, • r--, O rzl, ci • O A--) ,.., .. O-4 ••v7 . .., •-c -4—) ct ra.i 1)1) U U C'� (1) c -4.— r_., O • U t 4� Ff- 7-C: O O E A—e ct '-zi ;-1 /-c I) to i., Ac—t) cip .c..) O U U 6:-4 -ig, U U • 1-4O -4--) 175) T7j E--1 CO O i- 0A • Roof material • Landscaping improvements/buffer 0 06AIb SCRIPPS En SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Sherri Cipriani, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Pub Number Date Copyline PO # [—teM4 0-4 1 3 -at -t- 0 (5 INDIAN RIVER CO PLANNING 2680917 3/9/2015 PUBLIC HEARING EXPANSION OF BUILDIN Swor d subscribed 'efore me this day of, March 09, 2015, by Sherri Cipriani [X] personally known to me or [ ] who has produced as identification. , who is �74., f/4 Sandra Coldren SANDRA COLDREN Se MY COMMISSION # FF 004035 ; a; EXPIRES: April 1, 2017 <1:145°,,,' ,, Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Notary Public NEWSPAPER E -Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED *******: ************* DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES ORIGINAL 1.04 0 - OTICE OF ACTION in the Plaintiff, ,t. ornery or Immediate. y thereafter; hen a default will be rise ord eV. you her the de nem. in the cow rvint or petition. 0,ed February 2015 0Nny: tr./Jennie , Clerk By: ISI Jen000 nWWifer 4F0666 xw e.g. for Actom- 'Iodatiotns by Pe- ons h Disahill- ve.you are e pe.- witheon a diabibry rho needs any at- modattsn in o les proceeding. In ere pentitled. ocaed.a yon li ltd, a stop, to .h9, oa. PI contact AMni40 0NW LIOSo�00 313480,0752. FL 369le 90]�:3)o astst 7 n e NOTICE OF ACTION inp; ifryou ice Im- paired whin. Puh: M.'4271148273113 ardi 2 52015 TCN3618551 JEFFREY SMITH CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER Una gulch, FL 32960 COUNTY, FLORIDA Tele278:;1:918..„,, hone: By. sb: M., 1918 MICHAEL N NUTTER Puh: March 2 5 2915 IN Bas 003.: TCN2629582 57]30 BAKER N HOSTFRER Post Olin Boa 112 Orlando, Florida 7.1,00112 Telephone: lap Telleempieer. 16971161-0169 *Homey* for Plaintiff eque. for Accom- modations by Pep Diaabili- 312016G000310: e.s.reeiN erdi,aMpiny wno , d. any at PALM FINAN INC.,I .mmoeation in o - SERVICES, ., a ee. 10 panicip,m In Florida cwpwatin, this arocf odne. you Plaintiff, ae 9,r lee, a 9,c oyup,09th, JR- ET S A. RYONS 9.01,000 of nnain efenda AL eeiata ce. Ploase Oalendante 1;',14 IL 50 NE NOTICE OF SALE COC/ Club Oi0., TO:JOHN/ROMAN Sults 0,), Pon 51 4a1EEN BROMAN 1,0., FL 31986, 7)1 357 NINE MILE POINT say. be1Hr. lout F879POflT. NY 10056 he e., won n'64e i. 5.1.51 pica aL.iv u°' or i.e.,. Ron racdvinp .n thrt o'M,rg 19, me before /the 006 a, 0:00 A.M. ..h. before 1h, by electronic sale s9hedule. . e wile osier ed nce s les. than Clerk.Ipwilloffer0for dep 9 You Nv hcen de he le.I pro - Inp vim. eoa.obfare inFeo P a.oil iris lse..o b: Marro;57040 Nre,lloreclass.w TCN3619609 m eCOUNTISIWI AGAINST DEFEN- DANTS. JOHN BRO- M AN. COLLEEN BROMAN M undivided .5062% Interest in Unit 1. I ln'017y 4wli0n • dub se of .ndo. Ie.,.ndd 43nao- Binlum Ith. "an- ominium"I. ac a- ine'Of 0 he Onla- thereolCas minced Indian River County Planning Depa... Advertiser: Ad Number: Z 0 0 c 0) Insertion Number: N Section-Page-Zone(s): 3 Col x 73 ag N_ 05 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA c 0 .Q U ID CD Monday, March 09, 2015 12 • SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS • MONDAY, MARCH B. 2015 • IR TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED 10110E IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTII JUDICIAL CIRCUIT N AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CML ACTION GSE NO.: 9t ml.G05100. ONL910N. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA. Fernier PAUL FORD 415/4 MI ndaellell.. 0. a al, NOTICE OF ACTION T0. PAUL 0050 000* PAUL E 5000 LAST KNOWN AD- HABRA AFR5:16S61 CA- DELR6Y BEACH, FL 3180 CURRENT ADDRESS: TXIE1UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF PAUL FORD Al. PAUL E FORD LAST KNOWN 00- NABRIA 15551 CA - 90900 GIVE NOTICE NOTICE OF ACTION DELRAY BEACH, FL 33.3180 CURRENT ADDRESS: UNKNOWN ANY AND ALL UN. The St Johns River Water Management District IOixtri0l givev notice of receipt ovethe wallPowmig (CUPpp.miCtOhaump- don. Premier Citrus LLC, Consumptive Use Permit application 63233-6. By letter to Add w crops r•replce replacement crop 1 fel citrus. Therwitthdraw.0, v ed crop Gh1, 5,0534.0 pral.ct 10 co i, I roundwater from the Upper Fan Rio- AtCoonwry, 0.cctive e0 1, sedin ti000: 19 Rio- ;`, Indian ip: 33 5. Range: 3] E, known es Indian RNer Wes? S. Premier Citrus LLC, Consumptive Use Permit application !2213.9. By letter '0;1014 142rthe perminc4 proposes o sea row papa as , re in. allocation tion H g.wp• in. .eewtin. fro, lefLwi;wal. tet. by i, proposes w II con et of GrouneweteZ . 00 .0 Upper F10 Rao r Cour via ecu wells In Indian River COunry, Io- dg. sedan: 1, Township: PanBe: 37 E.Imown ae Section M. The file.) containing the permit applica- nts) are evallahls for Inspection Mc h,I mry.. 9 Friday, except for Ms- Oiandiaar,, 5 n. lrid, 32 0u Heise 8L, Palatka, FL 3 9,e of Me' You may vice low rte. 0 9,e d the fid call, ,.nice centers. but ar'edrneeldOcdl service s Inut the rte, a. v .aedlld ry r. of 1nform el e.14:4:4:awaa.lmfcoft.an.i 9,X0,:51 ml. le Mecums. don file 00wmen[s 0 be viewed on - linea, 001idnwee,OMpem0,0 09 0,0 00 09, To obtain fper m.vn how o find 9,d view permit 0000) . m ria d«vmene, trail eondaswate- omo amt a g ice Ito ▪ I t i elect Ne topic 01 shpts Irom the Tina sen a p 1 icv,i050 . 51009 YY, 9,e d , How to finds, T.th9ioal Sttaff Re - pen (ISMor other application file don The District issue. two Npe, d Indivmu- nlaffAwue0 CUR 700::,: the 590 0avd mptiva use eoea nit a cead annual bsin, pe▪ r Gov n in .raps u 1 hosts(, r g con- sumptive Issued CUus (where ds prop 0 g use exceeds 600,9,0 gallons er day on an avesee annual bad, « he Dialr c, tee e, a timely v bdanrel 0,0 .1nl.....0 1, on ap pllcati/n, lo, a .LM -ranee 001ividua' CUP well be where appl tion s pro- w seuer nless ,he applicatiopro- cessed, i �rded to an vppliwaon fs0 &J".4 w - g 00 below, I ,oh,050 LUe r 01.09/1/ below, to which event the cGavening, Board wlll consider the UIP Tne°n500000tng Beard normallystep on the second Tuesday of Me month. meets A substantial objecon to an apV0udn 101 • 0I0N-issued Indiw0ual CLIP must be ived in w 'ec and filed Wife7201 by) the Director, Bureau of Bpp-- elalory 5234100/, P.O. Boa 1122, 5.0.49. FL 321)9.1629, 01 by .000/0 vl /9, 14 dtaaiYoY. 01 or Gdelwm 01 Ib, 1114 l . Phase Maude.10her Me Permit A4pIicali,n Number or 0he Protect Name in the objetein. Notiliwtl,n 01 the . p0cau0o a Inn the Itfth dey ,h00andaidete in them. written ,w lice is persona one U.S. mail (for ,nose y none . t eactual notice W U.S. mail) me receive 0 whirl tnob.: Is a mile0 llor Coosa pe, - who receive ual 0o c by .- ,shed, 3r the este The 70000 Iv puce lano in me ebynewspaper.S.m actual notice la l. 'substantial provided by tion mail or a writ - l.0 not directed 0o he Di.vct eat Identifies the object �, concerns hy0r31opic or twi's men 1 Imp.ds re me ptovasee 3 e rule 23 d relates m lanual 0b r Ie c .111 .se Indy Iu lo, I,, objection ill muse ;'p4lmad t Ior , ata 4;1'4 IneiWd- •l LUP be on aidney�retl .aol�d lediuiebal CUr if Me a,VOsrE ° sly aubetantial Tv7: ton 0 lfl /rnotice 1 n.YDpmi4la caro°t:ndana decision on Meni t apgic 'on. Olicatta 9,a lora Govern- ing on pp Board -issued Individual CUP 000 by ae by h. 9 t'ni000 BH.,e. N3n4. q b,nnee0 DI.p�n oang will be novided 10 p ono ho have requested naivleuac n e. , ee y n for tdividual Notice of ImenJed 0121 2rt; eon a linden IOU a must ie receive. lg Individual CUP be l 1, by the Director, Bureau of /Rayy aae.ry 1 pp or t 00 site the , I 100, *use aPPct Decision is generated. for mase 101E s, 1414 evieetl to Balt' the theirap wMti tI days oI he iuestin 01 the mons, ico 11 you have information rons egarding comments r information regarding If yo Iha ke a writ n regmpti to w. If you oke won request t0 . District make dammnalnmmrmamn gareill ba 0p°ia d :; mH e74Bnrof. 0.22 wi v 000440109, ty are 0,0.0 .0 49,9 0 00 written objection fle n0 0., ryou oto a Ch tr1, Rona n to you a Chapter 110, Ron- da Statutes. ,dminisvam hearing Bu090/94,0/009/4., tyreuChef St.14146 RIaol,Wl.,Mhcit gemet Di. 60tt 19 Reid Sveet Palatka, FL 32177-2529 (386)329-4570 Pub: March 9.2015 TCN2681006 NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE MNETEENTH JUDICIAL CWCUTT W AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, 011010N0 F100D0 IL OMSION M-AIa.CA-022 GSE 00383: DLJ MORTGAGE PITVTAL 0*, Houston. X 77402`h Plaintiff, WILLIAM COCHHA oto 59, 1L N RIVER COUNTY.1,2MD0. M1as been Bled apaim, 7.1..ao�n..e opy 1,12,1 wHgen def , .0I l II0. 30 d arts, the 201 444111211.1g1:404 i,a1i0n, N any. Ronal) R Walla N Ase Plai 9 Suite M, Two id 2 2C00, TTan Florida 33634• rte the od.0.1 Nls Court a oast 160,0•dIa:fv er,j't; mhnvise da*N wt1 be ery dei el 5.menl 9,e Complaint Mon, Please .Ih lli wry :9,B h be 5101 The ,tl carves, P.L. nliff's amort. Awl 01 Re.son renoMi proeee Ist Co Lts u: Pryery Pu ° a°firs a.v M":2015 . J.R. Smith deR of the Court tea 0,0.90710erk mists for Accent- "1:1: ceom- daµ n. by Per - n Ith 0iablll- awroune,pn ' h • dta,bilM h0m0dnfon in so- o Partidpale In ntlU E4p: Yon /0,0no. s nab pinta KN T0E UN- TENANI IN SESSION OF 65 SILVER SANDS D1 ndam,L 32963; NOTICE Of FORECLOSURE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PAR - TE IN THIS AST 7 FORE COU AP. Scl IF AE OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 7110. Pub: MarchTCIV362220015 9I1] NOTICE O0F HERESALE 01/00 IS SY .0 0 011/i0Ra Fnel pme et e 0194.11 entered on laniary 16, 2015 in he ahove-ca�pi ad Loon the Clerk of ur,, Je110Y R. Smith, wit 400 12 me Nphwl r caswww-ih al bid der for IHetidenal 3. m�°in 1&‘3,0T 010007 OFTHE NICIALc 70 JUDICIAL IRO 7 IN AND FOR INDMN RIVER COUNrv. FLORIDA CIVIL ACI1ON GSE NO.: 31.0016 -CA- 000063 DM510N: NGAGEATIONSTAR MORT- LLC, PlaiMie, NEFF GENE DEE , at o.lendarnel. NOT0I FORECLOSURE SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE 107362 913004240 N05 Rcc4omm0deflon by Pe ties. with ,,.a - If you are a h drcy eccommodetion i order ro participate Young pOnlnd.,l roto of certain provision .! Please ' Court Admiry `anon, 250 NW cx.1 duh ret soD, F4 3 9e,t 72' lops, FL Sale least 7 0010 before °roup headed a.nnc., Hrirn"w8= aly this nupoean net ng ti hefoae the .ceagn.d days if you are hear Ieea the ) InpooIm 0mwcVB. 16 116 TCN2992750 NOTICE OF NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE ADMINISTRATION biline,. II e • AwerPA 0yy p disa- 0029ociatHighway, Al0. Bdi`a can; nethse' .m soil. 10 ac m3d,lien Vero Baem, FL 33963 InOth 0ro10lenpnv Phot: 722-23'5500 Jelling. F..:. n3.2K.rdoe you ere entitled. a, Etv/: 0000,lon of0ceh*n ployd®rll0ydl,w. 9,a e. Pleace Samndary 0.00.41: in Ceun AAmtry p,rd,90 N,110yaNw. frrrrti0n, 250 NW Country Club Drive, Pub: March 2,52015 Suite 001, 909,070: o6. 77rt St TCN257e914 Lode, FL 3699 099, 0.090.4554. ]T scheduled c `01X pear up, Hr this notificatonRreceiving .c`ebaloae the dulvd ppe,r- sae h torr tnan ys 000* cad hear - pe d arch to 100, Pub: nsM1 B. 16, 2016 TWIMOA9 EDI W THE CIRCLET COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT N AND FOR INMAN RIVER COUNTY. RORIDA CML ACTION GSE NO.: 31-2014G000784 DIVISION: NATIONSTAR MORT- GAGE LEG. Plaintiff. vs. NNIS FRAPPIER A/K/A DENNIS E. FRAMER. et al, Defndamhl. NOTICE E FORECLOSURE SAIF NOTICE IS 001 09 0 GIVEN gme 905 =8:MForecl0y February 5 3015, and entered IGCaasuNof3m0.20a''- NINIt ET[EHREuINVETt PHHC0thnm r. Plea d Court AdmiW 250 NW 22.80 Club Drive, it 21 ), Port 11. p FL 3tle t 7 10370 o lent 1 ya tis/ora y041- moo or imam& i twurnron /11th hdba100a he dul.d 095.6,- nca . II you i e hear p Im- OedoA` ti. b: a h B, 18, 2915 TCN3600015 NOTICE COUNTY, FLORIDA tr2fi5rot'y57, yy d dre05 C 9 OURT,92963, VERO BEACH. FL Any.erson claiming yf, fir mins erring any, other the he property owner a of h. dee 01 thd Iia /Iam.120.'310. '601 day, ,Iter Cha ole. Is mm py. JUSTINO. PAUL Florida Bar 11 ]1 6 226! a PAOGETT, PoakA d IT; Tallahassee, FL 31312 195It510 eheo ery nelegOwal me"B MINSNPlain1Y1 RIC ' ANNS WITH DISABILITIES AR. IF 100 AREA PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY l.0 NOTICE r7 MINIUM ASSOC IA - TION, INC.; he r.0,1,0.1;^w, The Cthe 50*0 wet nd beer alder 1909,2245 at 0,lab 101:10040 an 3/212 i0n15a1*al ow ,ngd` °dF4r/ILDIG H RUN 0,0 OMINI TME ON O NIUMF, O B PUBLIC RECORDS OF AN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDO FRA NOTICE 05 ADMINISTRATION N THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROBATE DEMON 910015Ges: CP000I NaW IN RE: ESTATE OF BRUCE MACINTYRE Deceased NOTICE TO CREDITORS The administration of Mhe estate of Bruce adntv.. deceased, whose date of death Ntuvembereg 13. Ithe Circuit Cent 10 ndian River 504071, Florida, Probate non, he nines, f hich isf2000 16th 010209.70 Beam, and addresses r sem. �eraoanl a els Na Pmes reartorpresentatives :w fonh below. All dit el tie decedentene 4.4.e..9,a other n.n al41:(1Vsemvien°.°. aoalnrt decsldum e wHtof Nh notice Is ra0od2 iretl be nmart file lhdr RAPPIRHER A/KIS daim0 with lb mutt 400 A. ODES WITHIN THE LATER FER A/KIA OF 3 MONTHS ASTER THE TIME OF 5 A/K/4 PUB* FRAPPIER; TIE 510 TION OFSTTHIO N0 - DA HOUSING TICS OR 30 DAYS FINANCE CORRA-AFTER THE 001E OF TON; he Ddery SERVICE OFA COPY 0em,, The Celt 01 OF THIS NOTICE ON he Cnun will ,ell m THEM ehe Moulten .od b,* All nhe ,nditme 1 nv.in ,00,hn the 409.0.,, ane 11.inai se.corn • other p. 00 4 having 0 r:00A M. ll .6tm. o soman As f0:00AM, en apaln,t E,cadnt/, /09 described the 1000 to a mu t fds m.ir Mg de,aribetl prop daima with 0 nun ry t len, In WITHIN 3 MONTHS °fid Final 10(5 AFTEP TIE GATE OF BLOCK 253, THE FIRST PUMICE. SEBASTIAN HIGH- TION OF THIS 140- LANDS UNIT 10 TICE ACCORDING TO THE ALL CLAIMS NOT PLAT THEREOF, RE- FILED WITHIN THE CORDED IN PIAT TIME PEPI005 SET TOOK 5 PAGE 37 E TNF PUBLIC RE IVER C 9010 OFOU RUNTY 1- FLORNA N A/ 512 BROOK THE 1501 N ELE- EDGE TERRAC2, SE MENTS OR APPUR- BaSTAN. iL 83%8 SET F ENANANY i THERETO. Any n00Htnldai.940 TW0 12) YEARS OR 000 110 0 RIVER i New. MORE AFTER THE RUN DRIVE, 68 n, Zoom Ne ala, a 0 F DEN T'5 DATE TAN, R 29611 90 other than the 0 F 0 E A T H I S Remi eili a of BARRED. AnYimerMn' e1M1a ro� Fontana must file in The WM flthAret tlee ewe Porn 01, 00O, If farm within sixty Is Mar,h ; 0015. any. pdtrlty.wtiva as of (luhl. err, .Ins Lee Person.l Piee sate 01 ,he .. Ronald RWolfe N Representative endene must file , Mee E. Ebel.. llei'2within si y 13 Nassau Drive 6B tl,ya q[er the Vero Ream, F04540 ° Ronal. R WON. 5 I Anomer for Pomona/ *95004, P.L 0, 10 5,0.9., 15019 Robin A Lloye, Sr., Tamp.,1,40, Esq. 33651-4718 A1711:16/132 nlmry 18!31 251-4)66 01*91 Bar Number: EIolO. a , 50. .bin Ll Florida Bar No. Robin Lloyd 5 N THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR NOIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 9000071 DIVISION N File No. M11CP001222 Division W RE ESTATE OF WILLIAM WARD WILLIA COLEMM VANI. ACOLE- /K/A 000.aed NORGE TO CR1SITORS The edministreti0n 01 WILLIAM°WARD COLEMAN. 0eeaae hose 0.0, of death was enpmdln0Ithe ar- it Court for Indian bn .00'iaitl n. the address of whim v2900 16th Avenue. eru Beech, FL and,0. The n, e a narwwx t9,. Personal the repress..,he vwwml rep^esen,a,iva'larth below Tee Tel., of Summary Aominis- raaon war lige.' December 16. AIlc 0/101. Ol Cha alien oram,1a anaec.aemt'e who mw al on notice ii .at. 0000 /Ie 012e: im. wen Chi. conn WITHIN THE LATER OF NNH1 AFTER THE0TIMTE OF THE GIPS] PUBUO TION OF THIS NO- TICE S 2511 OR 30 DAYS SERVICE THE DATE OF OF THIS NFAECOPY 05 OF THIS NOTICE ON All r credit. of decedent and ether db having claims 5, or demands 0020 10 001,010, 21e Nair WITHIwnh fhb NTHS nun WITHIN 3 MO 1AFTER0011 THE DATE OFA - THE FIRST SUCA- TION OF THIS NO- 7..value of she e,- approximately 00.00 and th o...YYe4;: 3161 Brlew0oe Coon, Lexington, SC NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION 28072 ALL CLAIMS NOT FILED WITHIN THE TIME PERIODS SET FORTH IN SECTION )33.703 OF THE FLORIDA PROBATE CODE WILL BE FOR EVER BARRED. NOTWITHSTANDING THE TIME PERI005 5E7 FORTH ABOVE. ANY CLAIM FILED TWO 21 YEARS OR MORE AFTER THE DECEDENT'S OATS OF DEATH IS The.dete of first pu01 n 1 Chir no« k Mnm 2, Per lop Personal 9.0,4,504edwn 216 9ddew0 4 Court Lexigloa s29072 Attorney for Personal Tylarr0 Po0*, Es,. E nail Addreer kBblo4M,wc,p 011da B,r Na. 1J13 . NOTICE OF SALE BOfficial Records ook 1071 Pe9e 2221, Public Record. of Indian PJvw Cann - Any person d,iminp M w0 oy.6therhan the ir v. m., mawal 4'"4d7.74.71.; . /* tendons most file , claim within .i„y 1601 date alter the T05.19000010001. will be made nnu loudv the S nal gment. of Fore- closure m Civil No. 313016Ga00310, Cn never C0 Mai Dn 0.. County. ATED. ,I F,0 1l.. 2015 say of February. MI5. NOTICE OF SALE N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FCR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, 17a,r,'a MUSIC In classified Advertising! Fled anything Nam pianos to 500050si«a pIIreE e. CheckBeautif1utTree ur use Classified The St Janna elwanl M.naeemnpt Oi/Ne 5110000 Yes nm applications): Calve Calve Bas sae -6 eq. in India 1, Township: 33 and l0IR includes 27013 for construed. of a agarneknownstem to oClry pel/Str .rel Home. The filets) containing the permit applica- tion.) pnlica- d through Ride. einspection cept for District holiday, 5 p.m. a the Dir - I{ dao . 1021 at 5t, Palatka, FL 2 one o2120. Yiu may also low 21ea at one 01 the District's Serv- e Beach, Inc., PO . FL 33965 am e prject is lc- Union: o-Seaton: 39 East, Emirate- lion mirs - man - offs I., Cemen, but y00 should cal0 Sery- Ice Center stall in advance 10 make Serv that the rte, ere a, , specific vice Center. Addi,Io,0110. moat P.190U . g 10.0:0 Ole d, 4000 0 c.0 loddaawater convpermit0nploeea.hem The derisionpemeit epohca0i0m 0,111 be mad. at the D/.0000'a erv¢.ed t where he application e processedlir the 0pliiad CIprov o.hy the rec00meBdfardnre.app*n Yoh r seised nosh lr'ale= wi Nh l6 days 0l Ni. nouw if Yau have b'ec[ion,, 43 qued,ione. I ardin me acb In/ermation re 7 rpro- p e wtY eed in Me permit application. rauen y c y Bureau Chief B r of N uulatory Supy , P.O. Riau 1dM, Pdeke FL 321)2-1629, ghqre nb®yapewmdpt44.14;017 wai. ll anbPed flIunmcdu0Ohieodn e lmps Pr Amaou okumober.Rorh.e quest to dng«esdiuin- formation ry 1dlregarding a speeificperrnie plition,yowh Floes.note Nat llinp a written bleo- 10,ilriea 5re; o..0 41'dminta,rapv°e hearing. Nolo. of District Decision or Intended District Decision will be provided to 50000'; who hay. r nengd,iwdividu- I nod/ O Aria Decision or Intended Dfatrfct Decirlon on the a`ppho.00n moa, b0 ived by the 01,0/05. Bo- auBureau d R.puldo , Sup port prior to the tla,v s h Nonce penen[etl. Margaret Daniels, Bureau Chief Bureau o, R**00 Wry su st JHnn. wyer weer �hh:9emnt 1019 Rem street Palatka. FL 32177-3529 13861TDN2EBB99$ 329-4570 Pub: Marg B, 2015 495000009.0.1 P.O. Boa 25016 Tampa, Florida 131325 1066 H 0.78007 No 62 61133 0130512NOS Rc,onmede'non, by Person, with Dies - NOTICE N0TI NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE This Is node. of a h ado of the Board of County Commissioner 0 f0 ere apodal wceptiow.Hw a proval I« n capon'' deny pace of 0, 5*1/ LN�. The vapn.ion is ICr 110,1,4 I 1,34 23va00n Once building 0 Faith 01,0,0 Church forded Ne.nprnedllocationrnapn 1, Township 33, Range M. Plaa,v see A public hearing. et which para In Interest and .411.0 v 5 shall I en unity to be heard, will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County. Florida, to the Count at e a 1;01'0 Nt 6eeq Yero o:ach.FI na:ldniicnE>Mlog. - ANIS a[ 0:00 am Mari Pleas ingrilsted quani009 20 the cu1ren0 0,0,10^ 8"117;4:44IN-70%21V al 0ocumnt9 w metFts request are on Me in she Inanp River County Pl,,,00Y Dh- ai n, IOOted at 1001 ]7m S re n 00/10/ g 'A' 0lth [0*0 A6mininrstion Comgec. Documee:el mry M ry ed W me Mee public ere invited to mega end 1p:eticipate in the ambers t blit M1ear- InO. Anyone one who may wish to ap«d am d022/ 0 0 mar mbe mad Minp, will need to ensure that a verbatim record ofm uP.d°eivaen: a made,ppeel is moa includes testimony dna evidence ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR TNI MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS W. DISABILITIES ACT 1ADAI COORDINATOR AT 226-1123 AT LEAST 48 HOURS W ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY. Wesley S. Saws, Duman To be advertised March 5 2015 TCN16a00,7 Looking for your next best friend? TCPalm.com/ classifieds INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM 10 R a, 111::,k1.(, I.1)R AN1F\I)\1I: VI's (L.I:(:I sL,1•I'I \' 1: ) TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator DEPARTMENTAHEAD CONCURRENCE: ./r` Stan Boling, AICP; Co unity Development Director March 9, 2015 Consideration of County -initiated Amendments to Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Chapter 902 (Administrative Mechanisms) and Chapter 915 (Planned Developments) to Grant the Planning and Zoning Commission the Authority to Approve Certain Modifications to Planned Development (PD) Setbacks and Other Dimensional Criteria and the Powers of the Board of (Zoning) Adjustment to Grant Variances It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 24, 2015. BACKGROUND In recent months, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) directed staff to initiate two changes to the LDRs regarding Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) approval authority. One change relates to granting the PZC the authority to grant variances and the other change involves granting authority to the PZC to approve certain modifications to setbacks within Planned Developments (PDs). Staff has combined both changes into a single LDR amendment ordinance for the BCC's consideration. • Authority to Grant Variances In most states, including Florida, local governments are granted zoning authority and are obligated to establish a board that has the authority to grant variances from zoning -related setbacks. In general, variances from zoning related setbacks are allowed only under a set of special circumstances unique to an existing lot that prevents or substantially restricts reasonable development of the lot. With respect to Indian River County, the LDRs currently provide for the Board of Adjustment (BOA) to hear zoning related setback variance requests. That 5 member board has been in place for decades; its caseload, however, has fallen dramatically since the early 1990s. In fact, only two variance requests have been considered by the BOA in the last 10 years and the board has not met since October 12, 2009. Because the BOA's caseload is minimal, because it meets so infrequently, and because it has been difficult to maintain the minimum number of BOA members necessary to constitute a quorum, staff requested that the BCC consider delegating zoning -related setback variance authority to the PZC through an LDR amendment and dissolving the BOA. At its December 16, 2014 meeting, the BCC considered staff's request and voted 5-0 to direct staff to initiate an LDR amendment to delegate BOA F.Commonity Development \CwDc BCC12015 BCC\902(BOA)and915(PDplans).doc 67 variance authority to the PZC (see attachment #1). Based on that direction, staff drafted an amendment granting variance authority to the PZC and presented that amendment to the PZC at a public hearing held on February 26, 2015. At that hearing, the PZC voted 5-0 to recommend that the BCC adopt the proposed changes (see attachment #2). • Authority to Reduce PD Setbacks At its September 16, 2014 meeting, the BCC considered a request to approve a 20% minor reduction in rear year setback requirements for the 8 marina lots within the Marsh Island PD. As required under current PD regulations, that request for a minor change in setbacks required a public hearing before the PZC and a public hearing before the BCC. The request was supported by staff, the Marsh Island architectural review board, the North Barrier Island Task Force, and the PZC. Ultimately, the request was unanimously approved by the BCC, as recommended. During the September 16th hearing, BCC members expressed a desire to consider having a less lengthy process for approving minor PD requests like the Marsh Island proposal, and directed staff to explore such changes. Based on the BCC's direction, staff drafted a change to allow PZC approval of minor PD setback reductions. That proposed change was considered by the PZC at a December 11, 2014 public hearing. At that hearing, the PZC voted 6-0 to recommend that the BCC adopt the proposed change (see attachment #3). Staff has now drafted an LDR amendment ordinance incorporating the proposed PZC variance authority changes and the proposed changes to allow PZC approval of minor PD setback modification requests. The BCC is now to consider the proposed amendments at its March 24, 2015 public hearing, and is to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the proposed amendments. ANALYSIS • Granting Variance Authority to the PZC The drastic reduction in BOA variance caseload is primarily due to two factors. First, since the County began requiring form board surveys for new homes in 1985, almost no setback (building location) mistakes related to initial construction have been made for most of the existing housing stock in the unincorporated area. Second, in the early 1990s, the LDRs were changed to allow staff -level variances and determinations of legal non -conformity for minor setback encroachments for structures constructed prior to form board survey requirements. Because of the dramatic drop in caseload, there is little need, if any, for a separate board to handle zoning related setback variances. In addition, with such little caseload activity and multi-year gaps between meetings, it has been difficult to maintain a full board. In fact, for more than a year, only two out of the five BOA member positions have been filled, and no meeting quorum is possible without additional appointments. Staff has coordinated with the County Attorney and determined that the BOA can be dissolved via a BCC resolution and that its variance authority can be delegated to the PZC via the proposed LDR amendments. In staff's opinion, the PZC is an existing body that has the expertise and ability to handle zoning related setback variance requests. Also, because the variance caseload is so small, delegation of variance granting authority to the PZC will not adversely impact the PZC's workload. F:\Commmtit Development \C.rDev BCC12015 BCC1902(BOAland9 t 5(PDplans).doc 2 68 As structured, Section 1 of the proposed ordinance adds to the list of PZC roles, responsibilities, and authority a statement that the PZC "...shall have and exercise the powers of the board of adjustment, in accordance with Section 902.08 and 902.09". Those referenced sections pertain to variance granting authority, criteria, and procedures; no changes are proposed to existing variance criteria or procedures. Proposed ordinance Section 2 adds an item to the section on BOA responsibilities and authority, stating that the PZC "...shall act as the board of adjustment...". That change assigns the role of the BOA to the PZC. Finally, Section 3 of the proposed ordinance adds a clarifying statement that BOA decisions (that is, decisions made by the PZC acting as the BOA) may be appealed to the BCC. That change makes it clear that variance decisions may be appealed to the BCC. That provision is consistent with past interpretation of the existing variance rules where, in a rare instance (one in the last 25 years), an applicant asserted a right to appeal a variance denial to the BCC. The proposed appeal provision is also consistent with the existing Chapter 902 provision that any PZC decision may be appealed to the BCC by a party with standing. In addition to the proposed LDR amendment, a resolution has been prepared by the County Attorney for the BCC's consideration (see attachment #8). That resolution, if adopted, will dissolve the BOA whose duties will be assumed by the PZC if the proposed ordinance is adopted. • Granting PZC Authority to Approve Minor PD Setback Modifications The PD process has been in place in Indian River County for 30 years and has been used extensively for numerous residential and commercial projects. Through the PD process, conventional development requirements such as building setbacks can be reduced, waived, or replaced with project -specific setbacks in return for project benefits and special design provisions. Project -specific setback and dimensional requirements are reflected on each project's approved conceptual PD plan. Over the years, many PD projects have been modified from originally approved project -specific setback requirements due to marketing changes or design changes sought by subsequent developers and/or lot owners. Under current Chapter 915 regulations, modifications to PDs require a formal application and review by staff. Changes to phasing and/or minor design changes consistent with the approved conceptual PD plan may be approved at the staff level or by the PZC, without a public hearing. Changes that would increase project density or intensity, reduce buffers or other compatibility measures, reduce conservation/preservation areas, or obtain waivers not previously granted (e.g. additional setback reductions), however, require the same approval process as the original PD application. That process requires a public hearing before the PZC and a public hearing before the BCC. The existing PD modifications review and approval process appropriately ensures public notice and BCC scrutiny for potentially major changes to approved PDs. Such major changes include project intensification, reduction in project conservation areas, and reductions in compatibility measures. With respect to modifications involving setback reductions, such changes may affect project compatibility if reductions affect project perimeters adjacent to surrounding properties located outside the project. If such changes are minor in nature and internal to the project, however, and are supported by the project's property owners association or architectural review board, then compatibility outside of and within the project is less of a concern. Last fall's Marsh Island PD setback modification request is an example of such a minor setback change that posed no compatibility concerns for properties outside of and within Marsh Island. F:\Commwdly Doelopmcm\CurDm\BCC@0 15 BCC1902(BOA)and915(PDplans).doc 3 69 In the last 20 years, a few minor setback reduction requests have been taken through the PZC hearing/BCC hearing process. Each of those requests were supported by the project's association and were approved by the Board. Staff is aware of one potential modification request that was not filed due to the existing lengthy process involving two public hearings. Section 4 of the proposed ordinance will change (make less lengthy) the PD modification process for applications similar to the Marsh Island request. As structured, the Section 4 changes will allow approval of a PD modification by the PZC at a public hearing, with no Board hearing or approval required, if the modification request: • Involves reductions in setbacks or other dimensional criteria for structures and lots not located on the PD project perimeter, and • Does not reduce setbacks or other dimensional criteria by more than 20%, and • Is supported by the project property owners association or architectural review board. In staff's opinion, the proposed Section 4 change will shorten by approximately 4 — 6 weeks the review process for PD modification requests that are minor in scale and pose no substantive compatibility concerns. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the BCC: 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance amending the LDRs to grant the PZC the authority to grant variances and to approve requests for minor PD setback modifications; and 2. Adopt the attached resolution dissolving the Board of (Zoning) Adjustment. ATTACHMENTS 1. December 16, 2014 BCC Minutes 2. Excerpt from Unapproved February 26, 2015 PZC Minutes 3. Excerpt from Approved December 11, 2014 PZC Minutes 4. Board of (Zoning) Adjustments Regulations 902.08 & 902.09 5. Planning and Zoning Commission Regulations 902.05 6. Memo from County Attorney 7. LDR Amendments Ordinance 8. Resolution Dissolving the Board of (Zoning) Adjustment APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: FOR: March 24, 2015 BY:(0 /1' ,4-444C/ �� F:\Community Derelopmenl\CurDeNBCC12015 BCC902(BOA)and915(PDpians).doc Indian River Co, Ap roved Date Admin. 3//9/ j5 Legal o- 3 47, is-- SBudget Budget 3s3,13, 3 /0 Dept. Risk Mgr. 4 70 2:53 ' 3. Request for BCC Authorization to Initiate a Land Development p.m. Regulation (LDR) Amendment to Dissolve the Zoning Board of Adjustment and Grant the Planning and Zoning Commission Authority to Consider Variances (memorandum dated December 8, 2014) Community Development Director Stan Boling provided background and analysis on staffs request to dissolve the Zoning Board of Adjustment and transfer that authority to the Planning & Zoning Commission (P&Z). MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Solari, SECONDED by Commissioner O'Bryan, to direct staff to initiate a Land Development Regulation (LDR) amendment to dissolve the Zoning Board of Adjustment and to delegate the authority to consider and grant zoning related setback variances to the Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z). Vice Chairman Solari initiated a brief discussion, with input from Chairman Davis, about the possibility of other County departments exploring opportunities to reduce the number of County committees. MOTION WAS AMENDED by Vice Chairman Solari, SECONDED by Commissioner O'Bryan, to commend the Community Development Department for a job well done, and encourage other County departments to bring forth similar measures to bring about Committee reductions. There was no further discussion. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the Motion carried unanimously. 12' DEPARTMENTA TTERS B. Emergency Servic None C. General Services None 1. Human Services None 2. Sandridge Golf Club Board of County Commission Minutes December 16, 2014 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 12 71 Mr. Emmons asked if stabilized grass parking meant parking on the lawn. Mr. Sweeney explained it was a grass surface with additional parking stops that had been evaluated to withstand light use in overflow situations. Dr. Day wondered if the two parking spaces that were not marked "C" on Attachment #3 of the backup were for handicapped parking. Mr. Sweeney responded they were standard sized parking spaces and the remaining 11 were compact spaces. Chairman Polackwich asked if there had been any objections from residents on the west side of the project. Mr. Sweeney confirmed notices had been sent and a sign posted and there had been no inquiries whatsoever. Chairman Polackwich closed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. ON MOTION BY Mr. Emmons, SECONDED BY Dr. Day, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval for the modular office addition with the conditions recommended by staff. Chairman Polackwich read the following into the record: A. Consideration of County -initiated Amendments to Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Chapter 902 (Administrative Mechanisms) to Grant the Planning and Zoning Commission the Powers of the Board of Adjustment [Legislative] Chairman Polackwich opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. Mr. Stan Boling, IRC Community Development Director, reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated February 2, 2015 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. He explained the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) membership had dwindled over the years and currently there were only two members out of the required five, which meant there was no quorum. He clarified staff had proposed the PZC would act as the BZA and the present BZA would be dissolved. Dr. Day observed the Analysis section of Mr. Boling's report stated the LDRs were changed to allow staff -level variances and determinations of legal non -conformity for minor setback encroachments for structures constructed prior PZC/Unapproved 4 ATTACHMENT 2 February 26, 2015 72 to form board survey requirements, and asked why it was necessary to involve the PZC. Mr. Boling related there might be a rare case where the size of a lot had been changed by right-of-way acquisition or something similar. Chairman Polackwich closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. ON MOTION BY Dr. Day, SECONDED BY Ms. Caldarone, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed LDR amendment ordinance to delegate zoning variance authority and responsibility to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner's Matters Discussion was held about why the Bent Pine Preserve issue was not placed on tonight's agenda as a public hearing. Planning Matters Mr. Boling advised at this time it did not appear there would be a PZC meeting on March 12, 2015; however he would keep the members apprised. Attorney's Matters Attorney Bill DeBraal, IRC Deputy County Attorney, said he would be giving a short presentation on the Sunshine Law at a future PZC meeting. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Chairman Alan Polackwich Date Reta Smith, Recording Secretary Date PZC/Unapproved 5 AT'TACHMEIIT 2 February 26, 2015 73 B. Consideration of Land Development Regulations (LDR) Amendment to Section 915.28, Allowing for Planning & Zoning Commission Approval of Certain Modifications to Planned Development (PD) Setbacks and Other Dimensional Criteria [Legislative] Mr. Stan Boling, IRC Community Development Director, reviewed information contained in his memorandum dated December 5, 2014 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. Chairman Zimmerman opened the public hearing at 8:26 p.m., and since no one wished to speak the public hearing was closed. ON MOTION BY Dr. Day, SECONDED BY Mr. Brognano, the members voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed LDR amendment. Commissioner's Matters Chairman Zimmerman praised IRC Planning staff for the excellent work they did on behalf of County residents and thanked them for the guidance offered during his term on the Board. Fellow members and staff thanked Mr. Zimmerman for his service as Chairman of the PZC. Planning Matters There were none. Attorney's Matters There were none. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m. Chairman Sam Zimmerman Date Reta Smith, Recording Secretary Date PZC/Approved 6 F:\BCC\AII Committees\P&Z\2014 —AGENDAS & MINUTES\P&Z-12-11-14.doc ATTACHMENT 3 December 11, 2014 74 12/9/2014 Indian River County, FL Code of ordinances Section 902.08. • Role of board of adjustment. (1) The board of adjustment shall receive and consider applications for variances from the terms of the county's land development regulations and shall grant such variances as will not be contrary to the public interest, pursuant to the procedures and requirements of the variance section of the land development regulations, section 902.09 (2) The board shall have and exercise the powers specified in F.S. 5 333.10, relating to airport zoning regulations, under rules consistent with said section and with the Code of Indian River County. (Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90; Ord. No. 92-11, § 16, 4-22-92) Section 902.09. - Variances. (1) Purpose and intent. This section is established to provide procedures for reviewing variances by t ie board of adjustment. A variance runs with the land and is a departure from the dimensional or numerical or other technical requirements of the land development regulations where such variance will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of the actions of the applicant or his predecessors in title, a literal enforcement of the land development regulations would result in an unnecessary and undue hardship. (2) Approving authority. The board of adjustment is hereby authorized to grant variances in accordance with the provisions of this section and can attach conditions to variances granted. (3) Type of variance to be allowed. The board of adjustment shall have the authority to grant the following variances: (a) A variance from the yard area requirements of any zoning district where there are unusual and practical difficulties in carrying out these provisions due to an irregular shape of the lot, topography, or other conditions, provided such variation will not seriously impact any adjoining property or the general welfare. (b) Other technical variances that occur when an owner or authorized agent can show that a strict application of the terms of the land development regulations relating to the use of the land will impose unusual and unique difficulties, but not loss of monetary value alone. (c) De -minimus setback variance. A de -minimus setback variance can be granted automatically at the staff level, under certain circumstances, without board approval. This applies in the following circumstances where the setback variance: 1. Is for a structure properly permitted where no form -board survey was required; 2. Is for 0.5 feet or less from the setback required at the time the structure was constructed or erected on the site; and 3. Is from property line(s) which have not been altered so as to cause or increase the nonconformity. (4) When variances are not allowed. (a) No variance shall be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a use in a zone or district In which such use is not permitted by these land development regulations, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of these land development regulations for said district. (b) aboutblank VACHMENT 4 1/3 75 12X37014 Indian River Gouty, FL Cotte of Ordinances No variances shall be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a special exception use in any zoning district without the approval require din the special exception section, and Including specific land use criteria. (c) No variance shall be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a use requiring an administrative permit in any zoning district without the approval required in the administrative permit section, and including specific land use criteria, (d) No variance shall be granted which relates In any way to a nonconforming use, except as allowed in the nonconformities section. (e) No variance shall be granted 'which modifies any definitions contained within these land development regulations. (f) No variance shall be granted which would in any way result in any increase in density above that permitted In the applicable zoning district regulations. (5) Procedures. (a) Any property owner may apply for a variance after a decision by the community development director that an existing property condition or a development proposal of such property owner does not comply with the provisions of these land development regulations, (b) The applicant must file an application for a variance along with the appropriate fee payable to Indian River County with the planning division. The application shall be in a form approved by the community development director and shall contain the following information: 1. Identification of the specific provisions of these land development regulations from which a variance is sought. 2. The nature and extent of the variance sought; an explanation why it is necessary; and the basis for the variance under section 902.09(3)(a) or (b). 3. The grounds relied upon to justify the proposed variance. 4. A legal description of the property, a copy of the warranty deed for the property, and a detailed plot plan of the property. (c) On all proceedings held before the board of adjustment, the staff of the planning division shall review the application and file a recommendation on each item. Such recommendation shall be transmitted to the board of adjustment prior to final action on any item before the board of adjustment, and shall be part of the record of the application. (d) Notice of the variance, in writing, shall be mailed by the planning division to the owners of all land which abuts the property upon which a variance is sought, at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing. The property appraiser's address for said owners shall be used in sending all such notices. The notice shall contain the name of the applicant for the variance, a description of the land sufficient to identify it, a description of the variance requested, as well as the date, time and place of the hearing. (6) Review by the board of adjustment. (a) in order to authorize any variance from the terms of these land development regulations, the board of adjustment shall determine that the application for variance is complete, that the public hearing has been held with the required notice and that the opportunity has been given for the aggrieved parties to appear and be heard in person or be represented by an attorney at law, or other authorized representatives. The board of adjustment shall also find that all of the following facts exist before granting a variance: aboutblank ATTACHMENT 4 213 76 12/8/2614 Indian River Carty, FL Coda of Ordinances 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are p eculiar to the land, structure, or building involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. 2. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant or illegal acts of previous property owners. 3. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the regulation to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. 4. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the regulations and would constitute an unnecessary and undue hardship upon the applicant. S. That the variance granted Is the minimum necessary in order to make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. 6. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the land development regulations, and the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. 7. That such variance will not be Injurious to the surrounding area or otherwise be detrimental to public welfare. 8. That the property cannot be put to a reasonable use in a manner which fully complies with the requirements of these land development regulations. (b) The following regulations also apply to the authorization of a variance: 1. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district and non -permitted use of lands, structures, or buildings In other zoning districts shall be considered grounds for the authorization of a variance. 2. No application or request may be reheard or reconsidered unless otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction, or unless new circumstances or information can be presented with a new application. (c) In granting any variance, the board of adjustment may make the authorization of the variance conditional upon such alternate and additional restrictions, stipulations and safeguards as it may deem necessary to ensure compliance with the purpose and intent of this chapter and consistency with the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. Violation of such conditions, when made a part of the terms under which the variance Is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this chapter. Such conditions restrictions, stipulations, and safeguards may include, but are not limited to, time within which the action for which the variance Is sought shall be begun or completed or both; the establishment of screening and/or buffering techniques; and provision for extensions or renewals. (7) Decision. The board of adjustment shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, furnishing the applicant a written statement of the reasons for any denial. (Ord. No. 90-1& § 1, 9-11-90) about:blank 3/3 ATTACHMENT 4 77 12/9/2014 Indian River County, FL Code of Ordinanoo6 Section 902.05. - Role of planning and zoning commission In planning and development. (1) The planning and zoning commission shall act as the designated local planning agency. (2) The planning and zoning commission of Indian River County shall have the power to recommend to the board of county commissioners land development regulations, ordinances, and amendments to land development regulations which are designed to promote orderly development and implement the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. (3) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether or not any proposed amendments to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the overall growth management goals and objectives of the county, and shall make recommendations regarding all such amendments to the board of county commissioners. (4) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether or not any proposed rezoning requests are consistent with the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan and make recommendations regarding all rezonings to the board of county commissioners. (5) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether or not specific proposed developments conform to the principles and requirements of the county's land development regulations and the comprehensive plan, shall make decisions on development applications, and shall make recommendations to the board of county commissioners based thereon. (6) The planning and zoning commission shall keep the board of county commissioners and the general public informed and advised on matters relating to planning and development. (7) The planning and zoning commission shall conduct such public hearings as may be required to gather such information for the drafting, establishment and maintenance of the various components of the comprehensive plan, and such additional public hearings as are specified under the provisions of these land development regulations. (8) The planning and zoning commission shall review and make decisions regarding applications for preliminary plat and site plan approval, (9) The planning and zoning commission shall receive petitions for special exception uses; review these petitions pursuant to the applicable special exception use criteria; receive input at an advertised public hearing and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the petitions to the board of county commissioners. (10) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether proposed administrative permit uses requiring planning and zoning commission review and approval conform to the specific use requirements and make decisions related thereto. (11) The planning and zoning commission may recommend that the board of county commissioners direct the planning staff to undertake special studies on the location, condition and adequacy of specific facilities. These may include, but are not limited to, studies on housing, commercial and industrial facilities, parks, playgrounds, beaches and other recreational facilities, public buildings, public and private utilities, transportation, parking, and development of regional impact (DRI) applications. (12) The planning and zoning commission of Indian River County shall have the power to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official In the enforcement of these land development about:blank ATTACHMENT 5 1/2 78 12/82014 Widen River County, FL Code of Ordinances regulations. The decision of the planning and zoning commission is final unless appealed to the board of county commissioners. (13) The planning and zoning commission shall interpret these land development regulations at the request of the community development director. (14) The planning and zoning commission shall perform any other duties which may be lawfully assigned to It. (15) The commission shall have and exercise the powers of the airport zoning commission as specified in F.S. § 333.05, under rules consistent with said section and with the Code of Indian River County. (Ord. No. 90-16, t 9-11-90; Ord. No. 92-11, 3 15, 4-22-92; Ord. No. 95-10, § 15B, 5-31-95) about:btank tit ATTACHMENT 6 79 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan ReingoId, County Attorney William K DeBrnal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Boling, Planning Director FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: October 23, 2013 SUBJECT: Board of Zoning Adjustment/Planning and Zoning Board — Airport Zoning As explained by the Attorney General's Office in AGO S6-34, Indian River County has the authority to merge the Board of Zoning Adjustment into the Planning and Zoning Commission. With respect to variances related to airport zoning, Section 333.10, Florida Statutes, states that "[wjhere a zoning board of appeals or adjustment already exists, it may be appointed as the board of adjustment." Thus, the already existing Planning and Zoning Commission can be granted the authority to approve or deny variances concerning airport zoning. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Adjustment may be dissolved with the functions being delegated to the Planning and Zoning Commission. DR:LAC Maa.ar,LkalCaarldaaa,40 * iavlrioanro Va. eater - M. aem ATTACHMENT 6 80 ORDINANCE 2015 - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONCERNING AMENDMENTS TO ITS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS); PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 902, ADMINISTRATIVE MECHANISMS, PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 915, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P.D.) PROCESS AND STANDARDS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 902.05, ROLE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 902.08, ROLE OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 902.09, VARIANCES; BY AMENDING SECTION 915.28, MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLANS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; CODIFICATION; SEVERABILITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHAPTER 902, ADMINISTRATIVE MECHANISMS, AND CHAPTER 915, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P.D.) PROCESS AND STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION #1: Amend LDR Section 902.05, Role of planning and zoning commission in planning and development, as follows: (1) The planning and zoning commission shall act as the designated local planning agency. (2) The planning and zoning commission of Indian River County shall have the power to recommend to the board of county commissioners land development regulations, ordinances, and amendments to land development regulations which are designed to promote orderly development and implement the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. (3) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether or not any proposed amendments to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the overall growth management goals and objectives of the county, and shall make recommendations regarding all such amendments to the board of county commissioners. (4) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether or not any proposed rezoning requests are consistent with the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan and make recommendations regarding all rezonings to the board of county commissioners. (5) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether or not specific proposed developments conform to the principles and requirements of the county's land development regulations and the comprehensive plan, shall make decisions on development applications, and shall make recommendations to the board of county commissioners based thereon. (6) The planning and zoning commission shall keep the board of county commissioners and the general public informed and advised on matters relating to planning and development. (7) The planning and zoning commission shall conduct such public hearings as may be required to gather such information for the drafting, establishment and maintenance of the various Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ATTACHMENT Strike -through+ Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\20150rdinances\2015- 902(boa)and915PD.doc 1 81 ORDINANCE 2015 - components of the comprehensive plan, and such additional public hearings as are specified under the provisions of these land development regulations. (8) The planning and zoning commission shall review and make decisions regarding applications for preliminary plat and site plan approval. The planning and zoning commission shall receive petitions for special exception uses; review these petitions pursuant to the applicable special exception use criteria; receive input at an advertised public hearing; and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the petitions to the board of county commissioners. (9) (10) The planning and zoning commission shall consider whether proposed administrative permit uses requiring planning and zoning commission review and approval conform to the specific use requirements and make decisions related thereto. (11) The planning and zoning commission may recommend that the board of county commissioners direct the planning staff to undertake special studies on the location, condition and adequacy of specific facilities. These may include, but are not limited to, studies on housing, commercial and industrial facilities, parks, playgrounds, beaches and other recreational facilities, public buildings, public and private utilities, transportation, parking, and development of regional impact (DRI) applications. (12)The planning and zoning commission of Indian River County shall have the power to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of these land development regulations. The decision of the planning and zoning commission is final unless appealed to the board of county commissioners. (13) The planning and zoning commission shall interpret these land development regulations at the request of the community development director. (14) The planning and zoning commission shall perform any other duties which may be lawfully assigned to it. (15) The commission shall have and exercise the powers of the airport zoning commission as specified in F.S. § 333.05, under rules consistent with said section and with the Code of Indian River County. (16) The commission shall have and exercise the powers of the board of adjustment, in accordance with section 902.08 and 902.09. r t h t i .N0 90-16„, 1, 9-1/-90; Ord. No. 92-11„, 15. -1-22-92; Ord. ATo. 95-10, 1513, 5-31-95) SECTION #2: Amend LDR Section 902.08, Role of board of adjustment, as follows: (1) The board of adjustment shall receive and consider applications for variances from the terms of the county's land development regulations and shall grant such variances as will not be contrary Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ATTACHMENT 7 Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2015Ordinances\2015- 902(boa)and915PD.doc 2 ORDINANCE 2015 - to the public interest, pursuant to the procedures and requirements of the variance section of the land development regulations, section 902.09 (2) The board shall have and exercise the powers specified in F.S. § 333.10, relating to airport zoning regulations, under rules consistent with said section and with the Code of Indian River County. (3) The planning and zoning commission shall act as the board of adjustment. (ord. No. 90-16, j� 1. 9_11_90: (h J. Na. 92_11. 16, 4-22_02) SECTION #3: Amend LDR Section 902.09, Variances, as follows: (1) Purpose and intent. This section is established to provide procedures for reviewing variances by the board of adjustment. A variance runs with the land and is a departure from the dimensional or numerical or other technical requirements of the land development regulations where such variance will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of the actions of the applicant or his predecessors in title, a literal enforcement of the land development regulations would result in an unnecessary and undue hardship. (2) Approving authority. The board of adjustment is hereby authorized to grant variances in accordance with the provisions of this section and can attach conditions to variances granted. (3) Type of variance to be allowed. The board of adjustment shall have the authority to grant the following variances: (a) A variance from the yard area requirements of any zoning district where there are unusual and practical difficulties in carrying out these provisions due to an irregular shape of the lot, topography, or other conditions, provided such variation will not seriously impact any adjoining property or the general welfare. (b) Other technical variances that occur when an owner or authorized agent can show that a strict application of the terms of the land development regulations relating to the use of the land will impose unusual and unique difficulties, but not loss of monetary value alone. (c) De -minimus setback variance. A de -minimus setback variance can be granted automatically at the staff level, under certain circumstances, without board approval. This applies in the following circumstances where the setback variance: 1. Is for a structure properly permitted where no form -board survey was required; 2. Is for 0.5 feet or less from the setback required at the time the structure was constructed or erected on the site; and 3. Is from property line(s) which have not been altered so as to cause or increase the nonconformity. (4) When variances are not allowed. (a) No variance shall be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a use in a zone or district in which such use is not permitted by these land development regulations, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of these land development regulations for said district. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Strike-t}irough: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance ATTACHMENT F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2015Ordinances\2015- 902(boa)and915PD.doc 3 83 ORDINANCE 2015- (b) No variances shall be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a special exception use in any zoning district without the approval required in the special exception section, and including specific land use criteria. (c) No variance shall be granted which would permit the establishment or expansion of a use requiring an administrative permit in any zoning district without the approval required in the administrative permit section, and including specific land use criteria. (d) No variance shall be granted which relates in any way to a nonconforming use, except as allowed in the nonconformities section. (e) No variance shall be granted which modifies any definitions contained within these land development regulations. (f) No variance shall be granted which would in any way result in any increase in density above that permitted in the applicable zoning district regulations. (5) Procedures. (a) Any property owner may apply for a variance after a decision by the community development director that an existing property condition or a development proposal of such property owner does not comply with the provisions of these land development regulations. (b) The applicant must file an application for a variance along with the appropriate fee payable to Indian River County with the planning division. The application shall be in a form approved by the community development director and shall contain the following information: 1. Identification of the specific provisions of these land development regulations from which a variance is sought. 2. The nature and extent of the variance sought; an explanation why it is necessary; and the basis for the variance under section 902.09(3)(a) or (b). 3. The grounds relied upon to justify the proposed variance. 4. A legal description of the property, a copy of the warranty deed for the property, and a detailed plot plan of the property. (c) On all proceedings held before the board of adjustment, the staff of the planning division shall review the application and file a recommendation on each item. Such recommendation shall be transmitted to the board of adjustment prior to final action on any item before the board of adjustment, and shall be part of the record of the application. (d) Notice of the variance, in writing, shall be mailed by the planning division to the owners of all land which abuts the property upon which a variance is sought, at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing. The property appraiser's address for said owners shall be used in sending all such notices. The notice shall contain the name of the applicant for the variance, a description of the land sufficient to identify it, a description of the variance requested, as well as the date, time and place of the hearing. (6) Review by the board of adjustment. (a) In order to authorize any variance from the terms of these land development regulations, the board of adjustment shall determine that the application for variance is complete, that the public hearing has been held with the required notice and that the opportunity has been given for the aggrieved parties to appear and be heard in person or be represented by an attorney at law, or other authorized representatives. The board of adjustment shall also find that all of the following facts exist before granting a variance: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 4 Strike -through : Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance A xC H pT 7 84 F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2015Ordinances\2015- - 9 2 oajan!d9 dor ORDINANCE 2015- 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. 2. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant or illegal acts of previous property owners. 3. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the regulation to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. 4. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the regulations and would constitute an unnecessary and undue hardship upon the applicant. 5. That the variance granted is the minimum necessary in order to make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. 6. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the land development regulations, and the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. 7. That such variance will not be injurious to the surrounding area or otherwise be detrimental to public welfare. 8. That the property cannot be put to a reasonable use in a manner which fully complies with the requirements of these land development regulations. (b) The following regulations also apply to the authorization of a variance: 1. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district and non -permitted use of lands, structures, or buildings in other zoning districts shall be considered grounds for the authorization of a variance. 2. No application or request may be reheard or reconsidered unless otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction, or unless new circumstances or information can be presented with a new application. (c) In granting any variance, the board of adjustment may make the authorization of the variance conditional upon such alternate and additional restrictions, stipulations and safeguards as it may deem necessary to ensure compliance with the purpose and intent of this chapter and consistency with the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. Violation of such conditions, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this chapter. Such conditions restrictions, stipulations, and safeguards may include, but are not limited to, time within which the action for which the variance is sought shall be begun or completed or both; the establishment of screening and/or buffering techniques; and provision for extensions or renewals. (7) Decision. The board of adjustment shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, furnishing the applicant a written statement of the reasons for any denial. A decision of the board of adjustment may be appealed to the board of county commissioners as provided in section 902.07(5). llh-cl. Vo. 90-16. v\' 1, 9_11_90) SECTION #4: Amend LDR Section 915.28, Modifications to planned development plans. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ATTACHMENT 7 Straka -through: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2015Ordinances\2015- 902(boa)and915PD.doc 5 85 ORDINANCE 2015 - Planned development plans may be modified as provided herein. (1) Proposals to increase the overall project density, increase the intensity of use(s), reduce buffers or other measures intended to ensure the compatibility with adjacent properties, reduce preservation/conservation areas, obtain special exception waivers not previously granted, require a change in the development parameters set up in a planned development zoning district, or to reduce, expand or otherwise modify the project area, shall require approval of a revised planned development conceptual plan and any other affected project plan(s). (A) A revised planned development conceptual plan shall be reviewed and approved in the same manner as the original planned development conceptual plan application, except as provided in sub -section (6) below. (B) Revisions of other affected plan(s), if any. (2) Phasing revisions shall require modifications to and the updating of the planned development conceptual plan and all affected preliminary planned development plans. Such modifications shall be reviewed and approved in the same manner as a minor site plan, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 914. (3) Preliminary planned development plans may be modified in the same manner as site plans and preliminary plats pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 913 and Chapter 914. Modifications shall generally conform to the approved planned development conceptual plan. A copy of an updated planned development conceptual plan sheet(s) shall accompany each copy of the proposed planned development plan modification. (4) Land development permits may be modified pursuant to the requirements, review and procedures for modifying land development permits contained in Chapter 913 (5) Final planned development plats may be modified pursuant to the re -platting procedures contained in Chapter 913 and standard County procedures for such reviews and approvals. (6) Reductions in setbacks and other dimensional criteria for structures and lots not located on the project perimeter may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing subject to the following criteria: (A) The proposed setback(s) and/or other dimensional criteria shall not be reduced more than 20% from the originally approved setback(s) and/or dimensional criteria standards; and (B) The applicant shall submit documentation confirming that the proposed setback(s) and/or dimensional criteria are supported by the project property owners association or, where applicable, the project architectural review board. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Str-ike-thr-oughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\CurDev \Ordinances\20 I 5Ordinances\2015- 902(boa)and915PD.doc ATTACHMENT 7 6 86 ORDINANCE 2015 - SECTION #5: SEVERABILITY If any clause, section or provision of this Ordinance shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any cause or reason, the same shall be eliminated from this Ordinance and the remaining portion of this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect and be as valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated therein. SECTION #6: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES The provisions of any other Indian River County ordinance that are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. SECTION #7: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or any other appropriate word. SECTION #8: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 9th day of March, 2015, for a public hearing to be held on the 24th day of March, 2015, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Wesley S. Davis Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY The Chairman there upon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of , 2015. BY: Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ATTACHMENT 7 Strike- through: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\20150rdinances\2015- 902(boa)and915PD.doc 7 87 ORDINANCE 2015 - ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller BY: Deputy Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LE • L SUFFICIENCY Pi(4. Rety Attorney tp APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP; C ity Development Director Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ATTACHMENT Strike -trough:: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2015Ordinances\2015- 902(boa)and915PD.doc 8 88 RESOLUTION 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TRANSFERRING THE AUTHORITY, POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DISSOLVING AND SUNSETTING THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners established the Board of Adjustment by Ordinance #71-3 on September 8, 1971; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment has the authority to grant variances from zoning related setbacks; and WHEREAS, the ordinance concerning the Board of Adjustment was amended by Ordinance #73-2, Ordinance #75-1, Ordinance 2001-020, and Ordinance 2011-007; and WHEREAS, changes to the County's land development regulations requiring form board surveys and providing staff with the authority to approve minor setback encroachments have greatly reduced the workload for the Board of Adjustment; and WHEREAS, there have been only two requests for variances in the last 10 years and the Board of Adjustment has not met since October 2009; and WHEREAS, according to Florida Attorney General Opinion 86-34 a County's planning and zoning commission is an appropriate body to hear requests for variances; and WHEREAS, the Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission meets regularly and has the expertise necessary to fairly decide requests for variances; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Pursuant to Ordinance 2015- , the authority, powers and duties of the Board of Adjustment are transferred to the Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. The Indian River County Board of Adjustment is hereby dissolved and sunsetted. 3. The Board wishes to express its deepest appreciation to all past and present Board of Adjustment committee members for their hard work and dedication to the job assigned to them. P TACHMENT 89 RESOLUTION 2015 - The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Wesley S. Davis Vice Chairman Bob Solari Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 24th day of March, 2015. Attest: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk to the Board and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved for form and legal sufficiency: illiam K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 2 By: Wesley S. Davis, Chairman ATTACHMENT E 90 O C N 0 O C %—I 0 • C V) 112 a.) Ol a -'CU 2 U c E 73 >, W (N 2 0 cu E L. E 0 -I-I 0.- (f) E < 01 D CI 0 0 0 ti)Q Q >.� N U --c5 +-a 4-) INI C O � C13 Q CL co � U a--+ CD cn -2 cc bp � � co c 0 c u L. o = emla CO CO 0 C 0 CD March 24, 2015 4J W E 0 - 0 +, ci_ c c CD co 0 . I -J E CO co O c v 4D Q c6 7 O .0 > .— O .- -o -�-� 0 O O.. — V) E +� a) cu '4--) L_ U •— m 0 C 73 C co L_ c cu E Z:5 oo > O °' O 75 0 cu +�N co -ULID u ..ca; c O c O O .s.. -co NI NJ O > > 0_ s- O 0_ U • • • 1 qoR�. o U co ID Q) 0 Q. 0 C O (13U 0 2 L 0 c 2 V) 4U U 0 0 C E ca a) V) 0 4u U 4D U U CO . gon-3 a ;.• 144 qop5 W ^� 0 W • V _= O O E a) V L._ . v) 4.- LI - C U C6 c E no as co O •— >' • — +- c-- 1 ca c6 . V V U ,- _c 4-- c6 N V . — cn CU O au -0 a cn • > = 2 c O O 0' 0 v) v) 0. ,� S o L E -0 v) -o L -o N '� C 8C CT w Q c _.c • • co U O m c •E - 0 E(f)V c 0 ca c 0-- 4.1 ▪ Q) cav,a--� 4� Q 0 cn G) V CO • — s... c O ca ( n c _ O •- V CI E 4..) 0 U L c N O G) Q) bel (I) L cD 0 4) (1) cu cc • CoA -1 co 4-1 V 4u 0 0 0 a_ 0 c1) • invited to 20% from 0 0 Cl- -0 V 4U (I) -0 O O ca � O ID 0_ >, ca .0 2 > V O O .. .5 0._stu n o_ co q0 A g U N 0 0 n ca +-) _c cn Q o O CO -0 Q) 4> > 0 0 4D cn L. N .- -0 -O U -0 U C CO c6 Ton -9 W a) Li— c a.) 4-- ro 0bp o E -I-,co +-) �- L_- U D 'ca U O _C X 4--)m O vCU C -0 O 0 ca ÷.3. CO —J C a) C co •— O v aE E -o (t5 -o 12 2 _. (J) 0 FD 4=- O a� c °'E p > O ..0. _ E i +-J V -o Ocu V cu c ,cu 0E 0 cu -0 ID co Q E o (13 4.-LI— U . Su O a)r- CO E zO N 0 > . • r t-- U O N 0- 1 /Y co O co cu V V c6 c Q +• co O co ▪ �— U m ca ca • cn cn m O `� Cu O � 0 i m 2 m 0 -o N o 0_ C .. CU co c6 s— " 0_ > 0 10 NCO }▪ ' O Q co cuO cu c N Qq,p "+--:(1) a- 0_ c6 CO -0 OV -0 U 0 Q O CU L_ • • +J M cu W Li-/ E %-i 0a) o 2 V N , % a) 03 L E °E n3 _c CO CO V U S- CO � U > C ,1 � 4) O '.�., bLL CO > *c4= >> Q) -0 E cn � E 'I- E O O E 70 p O E .— Ni,... 03 .) 75 4) 4) c +) LCD E Em -o 4u -o 4) E .N V 4.-) ,a) 4-) tap O 0 0 G) V N O +� U 4-;a) N u • .4-) Q) a_ c13 CL ca ca E • gon 13 O • CU 4J co 0 0 0 V • amendments attached ordinance • Staff recommends that BCC V 0 ca •- 0 4U O G) CC < _C O .0 0 V _J V m (1.) CIA 4) Cap -1-J • — +-) • — O Q) O Ln -o E -0 .(1) Q ca Q -o r -I (Ni SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS Indian River Press Journal T T, 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 SCRIPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Sherri Cipriani, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Pub Number Date Copvline PO # 2--tevi Iia. 10P �_.. b3-at-t-aol5 INDIAN RIVER CO PLANNING 2680809 319/2015 NOTICE HEARING 3/24/15 Swo to and subscribd before me this day of, March 09, 2015, by Sherri Cipriani [X] personally known to me or [ ] who has produced as identification. , who is /Yl 7n 67—t/d2eIL Sandra Coldren SANDRACOLDREN MY COMMISSION B FF 004035 EXPIRES: April 1, 2017 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Notary Public NEWSPAPER E -Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED ********************* DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES 1 OR/G/NA 1 q06-1 INCE OF SALE NOTICE OF SALE NONCE OF SALE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE TION; SEVERABILI- 21.000 41,0,1 ol, n- ByrtWesley TY ANO EFFECTIVE A draft M.O. pre- ^inn-r°Iet•d tie+- S. Davis, Chairman DAVE. 9,0.4,,dn.n<e i• n 1h,currmt T, be,doer, ie ed • a MbIO t Ne Plan 4.0.1. n 0*0,0 March 9, 3015 5.06 ordinance, it 049 Division 9111,. .02361231. ° TCN25B050B 1d' led, will prang located In the com- he lanning 5 tom un.ry d.*.IODmen. A N V O N E W H O Ing Corn. elthe9160 Rmor1 of thasCeunry ACCOMNOOATION DEV"' °0E10E OE ACTION I Adlunment 101+° Ad CoCom FOB THIS MEETING kll°eon In Gthedboard pl3 *due lwllno 0,3 THE LOU NTYI.S IN THE OFTHE ° l:, wN waif e2aw AAwuK.t° ep eel my AMERICANS WITH Fy ET OF00 auction. In a.1- decision, which Ta DISABILITIES ACT t tilde and ether di- be made a1 Into IAOA1 COe RDINA- YIANDI O0010IT .mlw, crlt°rle Urnlne eerd need b TDO aT 8361223 AT ktVFLONW . 1 tt for structures end aur. hal .1061 lFAST C HOURS IN o lou not baud m • 01m card Of th. ADVANCE OF -1 ,IV ENEPAL 0 arm'•netimmr0 D°9ce•dingps Is MEETWG. JUgISDICTION • vl•nned dael0P °de, w.rc, In- DM510N under ur <lutlea ea lmony WdAN RIVER0910 00,0NO. m vkeri, *zit •P :':111.1:1:74:1'17 d 011644,. upon COUNTY UNTY 2014 000012111 ^roved W .M1e 0, ,' 6196 Ins rpDe,l la BOARD Of i1Ni.'s.2oninp Cam- bawd COMMISSIONERS Berk 91 Amarcb, m N.A., successor Y NOTICE OF ACl'10N merger to BAC Home eans Sarvicine, LP. Homs Loans slS.M,' LP Plaintiff, ntiff Josh Fish. Unknown Spou.. 0 Joan Fish lion Sy tor - an iner!a, in0. nom 90110E OF AC11014 100. lie nTucesAI•p en er Vo as0th Ft, 40 Known 449,00,: 11611 NW 123rd Lane, 00640.2, Fl YOUOB6AR2 HEREBY NOTIFIED that en ac- tion foreclose .1.4lS on the 104 r Dnp P.DenY In River County. CK 2, IN GLE ly1- OOK 03. PAGE 40 MINA EAGLE ORN UT 1, ACCORDING TOO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN EISI BOOK 19, PAGEISI NOTICE OF 5ALE. NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE OF SALE dens. ,, PI0TICE OF ACTION - CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE DF SALE N0T10E OF ACTION 12, 13 ROVER ANO 14. OF PU& LIC REIli OIAF RIVER COUN- es beFLfile ! be dlau,9vnn ali.,a . r.. onJoyY OI Tear. ll ao 11.1v,tob O Jaon C. McOon Slco Ft 4 PCI.Bnd1hA 19,lm.re60n.r2 0, 19o1 N.W. 99,0h fi0,v, 14.20 l,0. FL,FL e 230derd B, within Thirty "ys da150 fins dee I Publication boar. Mv9h 4intrr,��yy°3pl,. •w fila tM CIerkl nl°5ia •saran Mier before Ice NOTICE OF SALE IN TF12 CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 320,40000121000001 TELLS 00000 BANK NA, o. T,o,tee for 1 e rp1N'ed 600.0 0 BANK OFL AMERICA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INC, COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS.THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2205.1, W CHIT ASSET MANAGEMENT IC,, 00501,10102011 4liability ,mmpanv, in Ae 1000011 a• 0001101.011(401 pursu.n1 n Sal c nail 20.1119 end Sema14 A3,eemenI dale* April 1, 2005,e•InlilO (MALI ASSOCIATES LTD- • Florida limned enne0*11, INDIAN RIVER MALL LLC, • Delawe a limited liability company, et aL„ elenda IS gg NOTICE OF SALE 6y WELLS FARGO SANK N.A.. y 0 Tr�usre H101rE5a G 0 t.'.d 0,04,,,091 BANK °OF AMENCA COMMEVCIAL MORTGAGE INC. COMMEVCIOL MORTnt datedes1110 2006 6 I fie 4101 j,Tn6,, SPlaintiff. RI �S.n131d gra t d° ,n,agaI,.tl . 5 0.2Wan W MALL ASSOCIATES01.1, , limited li°N6ly company, n capacity as spatial sem10r pursuant to that certain 10,6,2 and Seni0^p yApril Honda limned pan^ rsip and IIAN RIVER MALL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the Clerk of this Court will on March 16, 2012 n 10:00 A.M., or as soon therms er as um0 con be done, oiler for sale and sell to the *,06x0 *144., l.1 cash 011 ilewli Omirvm.realloledxe.40m, in accordance with sectio, 45..011. Florida Statutes. the following described real property, situate end being In Indian Neer County, F1dda m wit EASEHOLe PROPERTY the Lang A pursuant to partnership,. es landlord, and Indian Rim Mall, LLC, a Del - ho leasehold state 510 land described (n Ne amlhed Schedule 1 .heli unci^ 1,,,, acted October 10, 3226 between M MOB Associates, Ltd... Florida limied liability companym00101.14 00 ed4mce4 W Memorandum '!'-`',i' f Luse dated 0ttaba, 20, 0o0A as 5a time mry be 0.101004, ,restated, reolaud, eu d or olhawise madl103 ham tem° t. time. WAIVER MALL -THE EMALL SUBDI ; esen10 4An Tal Back 105, P p n and r59A, N ;he Publ(clRewr�d+.l'Indbn WVer Coumy,•Flalida.6 Eav, Indian Rwer Caunry, il.rida en being all of L°I ], Lol 6. Lot H and Lot 10. °I INDIAN RCEL II -Fee Simpl and Leasehold pe+6a pant. M eine 1011, 2 and pans n L01s 3.5, 5, 9 ana010 N Indian River Mae - 9., East 9,2herl.'. 12, `P001`R«orfs ufnlndiaB P1.,, 00400, 11,114..tnerce S0u5 100' 2T 12'aWesb0adlelaelre of 210.90 feel to a e:4t said pain being the =ins,, Ne 5 til, 2*, comer of peva° E,upe Suh1bd04 Der Nal Book * lie point: thence centime caner of I die^ Nva Ma10 00 ,,1 Peripheral Subdivision,,thence N10M BY 10 ,i West done the NOM line 01 u(d Inaian ,I Ma11- Ne East Peripheral pCl*l.Subdivision ° dlnanw al 590001001 to + p,,4,,SoN*M *.Sou551.10'O 3rire! d01anu.165,61.ell•p110011070101^9°theprimnd,d,,Sdplac4l0b1, 114 1[ M1ef01I,.l0lesv:e,^: ga fe 040^90du4510*,dna^,.01519.51116.26' 5.6' a,M1e0cetl501006onn`iifeel'°i iaw.a:m+i+l�of 6131,9114020 re61„0490N IM1Iw2ler1Y 443420.. ling• urtrreru% Ven M).rna rte,.: M ao.0oix:M1. 1010°1.0,1, .1110. len and h 00101 °110 e o point; t Doing; t 20914. thence 5,1,5 49.19' 16' West + 41410,,0 4143.94 0000 b a a,in5 lheq,e 0149153' ,0 n • ,cure to nu NoM 89. 576 d' West • dnanu 91263.6 feel .0 , 5.11 .M1n. Nola )a 5916 St LT • 3lrenu of Eli. ?eV to ° feet poin0 ee493 del Vela 510 re with • n1+00inl, ar n'e N,M 0 dia0n`40 010GO0r 1.081°10 p"oi3O hence • NOM feet OR 00 E+n1°tdi+t+4irte int; Elea`1, , Doinlsthn a 203.131 1,00 010^0 01.411010 5001011 wM +lradius 91255140 enge Nonh 47. feet00' Wen , c 01050.00100110 • t�1 v NaM 126.)5100 n 0 hence 64,5 40.43' 96' Eat 0 Sanaa °1365.001001 l0 • Dell. Ih.1u South 66.53' 24' Eae, 0 61410^,. an a Chmd 1poi a, 01302.631x0 9'114 ,bearing le 0,4, 12 V0 10 Est n ,point point , g 1 point o of dS001eet to a poi ; Nmu Sau1M1 6' S3p6.' East tlirt,nu of fl0.001e0110 • point.M1enu NoM1h 51.10' 06' Eu, • 611,.4,0 00 41.S1 feet n • Point aid poem a,0 Dein the I beginning. mng11.64 acres al land or less. e �..e mri11111 i4nal purp°+e. onN. ail ie(mennt n •neegg yy y n 5 5x0 d nu ,nil mmexdue(ve asemn0 .milling d n ^net pm10M, zre•re1 *16404 and Boiled ILL*, 9.1•14 InOi•n Riva Mall Renp0«•I Eaacme, and 0x00009c vARCEL III -Nan EOdusive Eesemene Omer •r w+ � ` H sena Inc. and IR Mall Aasodetee, lad., da0.d Ott.ber ], 16] .ntl recorded Ott106er 10. 16) in OM9io1 AO1,19 2. W end ,mng 6.11,fd Dayy [ Records Inc. nd ,, 0,4 s, Inc rind Sears, Peebuh and Lo, and .C. Penn Cam P002L Book 11]4, Pope 2915,se et. Together, sh( Indian River Cndnty,Flonaa. properly, PARCEL M - Nan e.g.'ve Posemema Txetner wilt rM1oae richt• ,q0 n'nadusive ereememe u^0itaing dghla taw:. Hoe mau`Inc, a°N,70 610440 m,po,0,1,40I,4 4uly 30166 mtl .110402 July contained1:..1'4.7,t:1011:-.en n n ,1111, 202 and .1104,0 W ,. bemoan I5. Mall ,1 010ee Ud. • Fbdda limied emm�nip lin pavans p 011 cord Book 111, Page )el, 1mended W A,,00d 540 Of 2,109 ion dl Covenants, 04 0344• rod Re 0, 9,10 11 a a bemen IA. Me11015001 County, , ,14.. Gmind hi d Lowv'• Home Cemers, . deed January PE 199 and nco1d.a March 1;1999 (n Official Record Book 0262 Page 12fi9, both OI the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. 0,04,, DlO PERSONAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION- EK04 60, d, pledged asst d, warranted. transferred. conveyed, and granted a secu11E3 inte,en S.IA. •^d in •,..ewer• end assigns (4 end to the following property rights, (n Greats Indian River now °LL,e or`he eafterr acquired W Debtors 910 lin` .rte e• 11:11"en on Try OT rtri; The le eo std Nem TheL ?holde [in hem^ ed Dv n Lee a dared 0 20, 2004 bow n IR Mat *aeon... Ltd, • •Florida 1m er• :p e landlord. and Indian River Malt LLC, ° 0.4 The 10 4E a en2e`n 510 Land' mars 1.d i^ l 3,1104ad Schedule„0,.1 1, .110 n 500 urtai • e er he amended, ns 0961 laxdr ,u n kmnea k 14ry01 < 01 a,0, 491411 14 00andum al 0101 sono Ott*ber 22,1001, 01 �h, same mry a O 1 0,b, , , O,,,,,t e e'Ieee nom time m 1m IeAfrl.1me 01.112,9, .,d l Ali exitt an a w0xnne. the Leas end surae 4 °I 5e Lear. and aR 4 also 20 6020.114, 92009x. p*Wleclai 105 demo df whatsoever ae ,.^am under 5. L.,n. endue pty. in 00 r 1006 n. OgM, el 401 re,eah 4 ala. and the rm's li t o, l rant n enhea 510 . to. ect , d sealing nom °O I .11* ane 2, 1110,08 0A er dant 5fe, amm m demand d M Deman 0154 In Iba kr in pareewa, 0r exec 5«urea Perm's right. o. tenant under the Let0b, to deft 05'10 Seaien 3610,10 0l 510 B'..”, , Coda,, oo0o, 0 or treat the Lea* a, tannins.. Na sent 1(I 9150 bankruptcy. neerxn0atian or insolvency (.oe Ler.r, eas Iii 1.0 rirt." ^ °rye Lease W 5, Lessor, as debtor,I poaaui°^,. , 0 ms e° 1050 y 0.41 110,,,„5«tin 365 °'4r, 010 1. ry Cade 0 me L•a.ed Premises and 0O additional 110,4. 01,40 Leantl 2rem.a. All 16600100 10 04, x60,4 0 dxelopme0 01044 nl01l00er ecgP00d b 1104M0* 00 use in 104,16on wi*h 50 lxud Prsmia04 and 510 development . Iantls an* 0,011, 5meln xt• O mry, Imm time to tim0, W 0,110 40 1.0 mon age m olherv4iu, he 0xll ,, n 0de+ubIea l0 50 210^ .150 60,.1 0InOmmem: p,,0inalom, lepdn, ,eda.emxn and 101Pnv0mems now x (el R,,.,0 meme. All 01 °110, ,l tight tide, and 140,017, In *O Leaus P ,04 65 00 040 build:^• aura frame,, °64.0.1, enpfo0Y0emenb, L00 eln0plOO ne0ahan I..*11 a 011010 61 4 or,*ow the Leased Pnmpa •nd that age awned re ts,M000. alleys. a sages, sewer ew•r nghts`wm101. water courses, water fights aria ms er tights and development tights, and all estates, rights, I1Ea,emen,0. All easement, , d0m,-olway *0 use. rights, 4621 and pares of lana, 01000°, rays. alleys, passages, Q,^e 1Ji11,, ois'p°00e11 1 .n• lured Pnm:,., and 5. lmp 0,110,0 i,les, :nt re!rel grvile0ee, 1ihe0x, u4 0111, lemmems, o 500 0mn0 and ,eunna^uv 1 ,^'e nature w a ,o 100, 0TH con 041 ,r 55.00001 beton yN and 510 140000 i and f vinery. p opd ell p,00 ,l, m 510 bed .1 any ruses road .avenue, °paned a0 ,o1'Deher 100,°(^ end to 50 leased°P Premises a1tl'lne Improvements and `e every pant and parcel me,«0f, with`N° agger rights es dower, 1120TH. of canary, prapeM. D'wvsion, *aim and *emend whatsmaver, born al law and in eye,. n M1ano'. plumbing, fighting, communication, end eleva,0 fixture+b furniture, whw•re used in o0 to operate 1yj Fixtures and Personal PnaM All machinery, land and nature re whale.. (including, .ow ed not limned to. ,II .Dn�w 'r * or snail h lumbi li Min rM t rte ,rending end .net property 100 even 1000 and ^ala0 w ertrrI owned p. Debtor, 0L00 0 Orem,,, 0,4`1*, shall .,0 a^ interest. rear;;, h0veha ILcma1e,ol, E . Lease ,,01 an ^01410 102i1o00 1`4wn0 W or 0,mt 110 5110*. • a 6,, 11 in 40nnetti*0116 the ee.9 Or 115 1 °ppeer ion d x.a•nry 0 0101000 ,pnutt ° 0 .0005. 206201 ° ° In Prep Deman has m ,hall nave e i :.109,0 now a hrsonal 1'9909 upon 510 lease Nemend and 510 Impqsa t Personal r usable m con may he web prenyl or „tire ,0*., 00 and ed in d ry 2f de lease Premise, end aha Imged and ea ced by the the or elates are sly ane 5a pert isle end interest of of 'Uniform Co i^ and n any 01 Lit Pelona Nan . wbid may he oblate 010 my .0.411 interests, 0a tlennee (n 5e Un- iLeaerm Commercialts. Code, a, adopted and enacted by the ,? 9, Non when any 150 other era n netts (the (whether en or oral) Casual. end sit proceeds an D!°dun, t, a •base; I oon•a, end RL,00 All Isar, and tesublease, rove a n.. 0,4 , aerates. ,,,4, w«411:ns or 45.0 r other agreement relating written 0 o p sem n venial ala ,0000 a e=.1000 + 20444x094:mann Tien, tq 4x 4r ,41*W ,II °r uM n o bye L..... ! other •ra the t* and emn¢ ane sale m e perfdln, amendment er a5., f th• cove n,c toleases..ements 0 5. polaorla,o0•,4 tibserved re theeno1he Iparryndular0, 0,,04l21. or`rhereafterlen- 0 1010 su • ether before ea er nee 11 d ivory Buer fl. e1 the f anymrnce ns 0w e t un d t ,M1e ,010040, ,0 10'., 011mvely, she n 00 pe b 010E mna cone. inn 441, or ager 510 filing 0a 5 ,1 ,,,, the Debtor 1010elvfor etre. under 0m Crednol0 RipMr Lawa Ili ,0,14 rvely, the leases 1. 0TH •0 6961 lige and Imerc•t of Oehtn nz 04,00 con profits Nge ll and ,2thereunder.oo including, without .,,d 4h or securities deposited,thereunder2,1he ,euro 50 p 01,41 Dee 4,.be V p,yV OI 501 fl.lun under ner.nda +Rights Lnto (colleCn1N`1he 91..1201 ane 011 roc qsw (including or OJ 0, d gas or 450 mineral 0.1,0 (sand bunu,0. wed . 5.m:^ before l* •henM1P Mi11 by 0ain4. Debtor of any 200,1,194 for mlie0 under ala Cred'nmr Rights laws (4alleaive proceeds ham 510 ran Or lIns re:la Pro enhe Luee 4,. lbs d,,,to.4a(vrep apply 510, L., , 54 Paymml 0 the,9 00 g. without limitation, 5e right arve and imply lij Imunnu Proceeds. MI Inmran=e PrOcntla repeat I Ne Leveed Premlws under ear Policia< 4114420 5v Leased Premises, 146,.611 m 110 ppY 510 droneds of any Polinee. �920.10400 0 relee=" mea::n G. rheOaG Io1 Lamagv I Rae Pmp+r9i pea t0 Try roan o l,G.^damnation Aw•0t. Ali Awnda, (46,.647 Int0et 50.1,1 whld. mry 110imn00101410101 ins ri4ML 001^ 014Mn3e 010, da 101 io .n`aer i^w en m e valise n Ne ve1ue,llhlhei0aerd Pnmiae<, 9150 orre of eminent eu m f dughe,. nm the name en In behalf' mefe (^ lieu t n In+^i andnn 4 teeoe t vsed -a+. r 0'or indeed nr go,.ee4 g. 11169 Lomond. All refund0, r0 0'O o vedn• 1 cobl,,,10 wi5.0u0,0n in real •4010 l0 •nd ane••mena 0 *,o,u a he lea+etl r e h 0100014101011 +non 011 proceeding ,a p,ol..11 nor reduction- (HNphn The nigh, in the 40.10 ens on behaN 100 Dab., n appear In end *eland my anion .11 goued:110 brought seta* reaped to the Leased 211.11+0• and ,a commence +ha interest of 'Secured Pala i^ the Leased Remises; or 2200051 emend 101 •110 Y ri Ma IM1erei and Nvr 0. rupenilo . ImlAgnememe. All aOleements, 00mnv, rorcricotx, :xlmnwme, hand014ev, ger; Feem4 de toe leufiy E1e0etsns arty°Imexem now or M :::neer 01:1 L1.1vd °nine Leased P,:rto° mtl +Try en '.1.°I VII ., 4 1,1, est , *. 10uon 01 the y rum, payable +lILa ambles. le a or 41k', , iha n Tern 'a Su,. IOPI inducting goodwill, 2limitation,,12So right, upon 5t other general 4! nv d les owned l rn.el ng coiled used Ion with Me operation 5e Leasehold Inllmangibles. All lndenames, vatlemarb, aervi=em0rb, seem. wxtigM1t+� gaadw111, boob and records, and all o1Nr Benenl Intanplblea owned by Debtor relating t° or wee in connection wiU Ile Opentian Nemtx' 20011 accounts m0inle Demur wile ,sea n 510 leaved P,emiset indust^c Inul Iimilala^, .110 5xerve Auouma, 510 L«Y4O2 A«0um, end 111 °1004^0 nlab6.hed Dunuam to 5a gal Accounts. MI Lo. *g, o«mws ens de e W I de 00 5a l.hbo0 Account and ,II 00010 40,420, M0OA ,4:9401,,, a.5,00. ,velment 2003003, fin01dal a 4405, 11ulmmenls and o.Ml goeM 601* Anide n 1 tl1 Loan Agreement 10900 P%5 011 seesi.s a wire vane ' m0 .herein from time t° lime ens ell pr10cx dues, dis[rbm,0m or dividaMs or rubnilulions ecludn and 5ereoh, h or liquidation claims, end I5) Ca0l6i95 All a*ca& 1 the umer0O5, voluntary r:m a iten , can , in Subsection, ial tG1ng9, wnlout limitation Insurance 2191064 and Awards, into us qui jr(!) doer NghO. AnY+105 all °ser riOMs'r Oemor (^ and,. 510 items set IeM in SubseFEE MORTGAGE REAL°PROPERTY DESCRIPTION- EKHIBR C PARCEL I - Fee Simp, 01 Le+zeno* A gonion al 111 TH .1,.400 5 50 NoM 112 o0 Section S, Township 33 Sous, Range 39 East !Mien Neer County, Florida and being 051 of Lot ], Lot 8, Lot 9 end Ln 10, el INDIAN RIVER MALL - THE MALL SUBDIVISION, as recorded Na. Book n, Papa 59 and 590. of 5e Pudic Records of Indian River Caunry, Florida. Ming L I1. Fa 5i man and Le•aellald genic,. M Being L" 1, 3 and pans of Lots 3, 5, 8, B and 10 00lndian Neer M0U - 510 East Peripheral Sobd'slo' l' icvPecortlt afnlnE in Rig 04 Punry, Folida04..laSouth 00° OY 12'dWut ,adlrt,nl<of 310',BOZO 00 feel to ° point, said paint being the Commencing n 5e Southwest comer of Rivera Etats Subakvi0i3n Der Plat Book 1, Pape 12, Northeast .meg of Indian River corner -Tne East Eames 54ral Su (0,01, on; 50410 North 69' SY 059' Wen 6940 510 1 4,0lie 00 ,•M Indict Rirer Mall - the East satic rd W,41 .:00^ 0 5alo21 of 51 feet n o point Sena,119continu- e1. g don0 ed 50711line 5aln 61° 00' O6' West • dlnmcv N 6.56 ree11, 0 Dolnt aid 209140 be:n0l'0 1i0060110101 •nd 11040 of 109mn1nll01d1e fallaw(n9 d°•mp0on: Thence ave 5fee , d a cent of 549.50 100110 • yy 411 5.140 due Wxt ,distance 0010.241,01 n , eIM; thence due South • dmn,e ,1151. 0 lav 110 a 0 fes alng curve to the 55.5]9leg Geist., • curve 10 feet tight having a n le of11000 fav and • .meal 0491 9139. 55 55 n • paldi than=e Nanh 4)' W' 11' Wen • d,n e N of B6.tl lav 110 •point; thence N4nhweneet 11.920 fen along 0 serve 9.the INt fl,,, dna 1016010 feel and , .0101 angle 0us 113. 53' 1810 • curve thrice No. 99.53 6' Wen • dist ,1223rd I teat to • point' thence North )9. 6B bid' Wn1, dlstsnu 16O.ou len n • e1,1 thence 5x5 49° 19' 36- West , distance of feet to 4 lav l0 •Point 1*e 41. nce 66.404 0,1 Vol ° 51015* with ,radius °1260.31 feet and a l*0ld Mngth OI9fi.11 len *001420 •beating el NoM 46. 31 li' Wen 10 • amt: thence to North 55.57 W. W«1, distance along 0131000 rev t0 • point 00.19, NOM .00 0040 -Wast , di lin. .1153.91,0 eo • amt Sena NOM • 2.Nnu'10500100 t0 • yoi^t thence North00' Ean • 263.00 Tal n a point Ounce 308.131 len ,Ione a .av,10the ,n w5 • 1414, *136.00 feel and a chard le^91h hr nce•So leer hemp •bean:110 of Nnce 22. 30' 0fe Etat l0 0 Point:nce a NOM 12;78 feet • a pdnl: 5010 South e9• poi 56' Ent s distance 1365 00 point of • e1^l; Senn SO lb 66. 53' 64' Ean , distance til45.O01eel I 0 point, 5ente 5Iut0 6.53 54' East , distance o1390.001ev.o r point thence North 51° 10' 6' East • 41,14. °11001 lav Ili , point said 2010 0100 being 5101111100 beginning. ConnininB renis rues Hand m0e lir las. AAI Mann,., on • cape v aquae /°Drape are for Informational :oral purposes only. T;TenBA-Non Exclusive,l*Froman g right• (n ra• Won TPARCEL onOher with 5m+v d ht• and nonexclu•ivv sraunn0 conninl5 12040TH. veered eelned •nd IIINted W Sal 94014 Indian Pi10r Mall P«i I E•4emnr •nd Ounting anreem.m W nil .mile Da el 2 m Stores, Tne and 9urdine<, Inc. nd Says. R°ebu4N nd C^, rte J.C. Pennry Company, Inc nd IR Mall A•a°<ie0ee, Ud., ave* Oaobv ], 1g9] nd rv<^rded On°bvr 10. 199) in 011i<ial P rd Book ttd, P•pv 39.5, a15e Pubne Records of Indian River County, Florida. PARCEL IV - Nan Eadu•ive Elements g Fights T25 o,0r wnM1 ,h0 se nggh0 and non-exclusive Ltd, easements, 4. c partnershiplhts 1In ice. prime.. me . created de •n Nanh Gamine borxnli Fermin 6°46 Ju1rd3L106 end a «I°dea`Jul, 3, 16 61111 019 41.1 021 E 90ok 1 11� Peg° ]01 .0,0,400 W and ,.twee^ LR Ma1I Associates, Ltd, •d low: a H'me Cemae Inc, • NOnh Grabs corporation, dyed January1I, 196 and Amendment el Declare) n °( Covenant•, Conditions •rd Rs.0rittimna b1 nd hem<en I.A. Mall A•Lo4irtsa, Ud. •Florida 4.11406 D°nnenhip an dao March I2 1999 in Om=ial Pe,mrtl Book l0S' P•y 1268 205 °150 Publn Rmmas 01 Indira Nwr Caunry, Florida. FEE MORTGAGE PERSONAL PRCPEPTV DESCNPTIOM E%HIBR 0 ry Ameren Iv Debtor, IR Mall Aaa'daln. ,S, a Flantla limited Dann.nNp, M1as monga9ad pnnletl bar9ainee, plede•0. axi9nad warremae, 0anslenee, ,041416, and Palled a sv.n Secured PaO op M dynrW '�tn0nes0.ntl eta^• °,:t'Zr 5v rcBirtaea holden OI Bane of Amann Cammerual MoOBax Inc LommaNal Manpapo Paee-TmouOn Cerdn.ty. Spivs 22061, and ha au.e«ors •nil asaipm in ala t° 510 1°II°winB ed Ort. I p,, agdree.1 Dema° Ib)band Ths nal pro M san(Gd in 5=hb101 and artacbe berm and mesa ., 0 beoOby D.Lne'I; Ibl m time to Land. 0, 04dnialal I.1dr, eetor o •rte se,rW expressly me a sunw to th I o lhl, 5 cur x1 'l uenattion wit^ LM10 Land and N0 dwelopmml 9150 Lana and a2 •bid:tical lane0 ala aNlx r "era which may. ham Dime n,mq W 0001, m,,o, 1500a0e a °50,.14•, io aenlarg mode slimed n the Ian of 50 Security Instrument, or hereafter erected or leaved within a0 above 510 Land and Mat ere owned la Impprrov n, The W IdinOs. nmau;x fixtures, additions, aNaryemnlr, mamma, modifiuli°ne, nWrn• replacements and improvements now W Dasmen s.. Aire1. ere'lmprmemenn I: Ma and development rights, and 0R estates, Tal Easements. in All easemene, tiYmwl-cote m ae rights. strips •^e gores el land, meets. won. of any at re whals eVer,I fnrany way now or courses. belonging. telatin30WC pertaining o 5e Lana ad 5e Improvements anli rierq 510,, interest, privileges, liberties, seminude, tenements, 'l 1* me01 and appurtenances l y ^nm. w v ' c po nil rem0ndvn, 0 d ,II Ina nv a In 510 bed 101 my avers. mae'n aenue, 90.16 Or 2.120406, In 119.1'1 or aalot^i^p n. L.1d m 13 0llp On• 0 2001 ala ,ll ne amt«, Paha, OHea. ima«ts. X911„101 down 4940 or=x, E,lpo, 20.20041. x12,700 ,. su nd E11 l0 defined l0 00 II n Me • 1, in °9urry.010eb Code th nd n eM1• laN nd 510 wnecromems nd req edrr nd petit,nmol, w e d.4 npunn°nunhe010 lel Land or Is lo tPd1ed Me point a au h term i• defined An AM. 9 0151 U^:ery. Comment, furnishings, COs° Ihmernd ecronnaw owma n nd other of ceeq ip 10ebne wow r• or of ar er coque E n 0 btt r and e Vemealall a ai Lona 0 0 buten 5nd re Or thmd11 lof any w h0 4m kmius to, ,11 m•dth VvI ttacpmm nt .cmpon, electronic,aqi Ont penning and oyer .feu equipment now owned or M1meoher acquire by s Yet substitutionsqiant s replacements 0l any pe 510 hinging together and all attachments. i 00.12010^110, Ina, Debtor and +m711*1 installed Maroon Or affixed 06.104 'collectively, the Epulpmem'4 No,wiSalamm�0 the l0 Boin0. Equipment mall not include,any propaM belenBinp Iv Borrower under 50 Lease, wimp l0 510 •40.1,64 Deh,4r aM1all nave ala riFmeennner6 [hmein,0 o 0 TTMT 2011E e, 1010M1, Ow^,nhq of coni* fna".7 11 b °i0fon,yr101 build p °r1 uZ,Zro dm,r: eco `�u,ete7 unmuaren =x,wn err° .Z.° M o nn it 1 Orli^stllatio^ 0^15° rzz.unn svuc N I d' 1 N Improvements pp N M wh'ch M1 E d l with I,em2 M I I A p Gnu. s her - M1 her attached 0a Installed connection w eD M1 l• d I d d W machinery d pl 9 'p IIt Twinge. 1P , 20qp WT.'S. p d pi Uar,rysnmv, fry en p h 0 s end equ Anent heating.) ventilating. electrical, l e wairomen d I a E hre .:...0.21i.. p a port n o v'A equy t ry ll• x015,0• dr1wa•ds 1 9 a e e o d S 0 0I' TryI d leh 51,019,4 d'ry dullIyy i Id Sen qa • I 1., Vy 5 0 m r da,, Geminiani ,11 Other Hikes 1whether or not situated easement, r e yy , feel Inks MN au pN d II wttur g a0 n 110 vem menus betterments and substitutions forn`of the Gregoirm and 5e emceed DDthor. Ieollenvely. . 'F ver.% Nom thsu^d np Na foregoing, Pinus. 'NJ`[n include • Y eoPenY whtn 10 Stirs remove ea pursuant to leases, except to the anent that Demon shall have arty right or Interest therein: g rvahle, h,nd',ea, lice anie10 n ends Dherm •nd ,II Or IplPlen ntl ProoeM. AJI lu• , lu iani�pa, bloc 01 a serine a„a.A. Ool theupreeis apionsp ^Jar Horn eirC • it . . n min°iblv,` I San Fi nwhi h m b y o p M 01 • o ,1, or cM1 n whatsoever defined i toOVM1ar wi5 ,IIIc •lse•U redaccial'<°d0r1,2 005ner ria Uni nenr w ser.(° ode e v o,ed en we <ct f0' ,A`„1 e'P3's n e ,Knape 1?' andt :^d l , c I cared hen or boar,*,, Len4 +nil ennlmpr,aemamt ° 1.eariry A^Imen.0,a`61114 Oce120 nilam Com rcCod , 10,.2040.112 em 1 Eh abs are Or N ,x°wfi and the 620TH f, • d (Deb r In •105 10 1420 Pel• n 1 n. o M 0ll 01 0y be . b11 tt 0 d ntl .due• Of Me above, 510 Pn00ary 90101°6 or,Tne ....l val,rmhvner be,re 10.0'1 • 15, 01119 40 ,1t•Our`el1 Deb °r11a1 a`m 20411 `ntlor retial undec111 U.S.C. 0101 • Inv a W b • .1606 fr m me 1 nv'B ntrugq Cods'1 nd a0 01,.60 ,i0 . a 5vvun2er' ld°7 0410 lim a+M1 e . by n s menu ` e ,no 910 re AM ldeln •nd end • 0 : ° i d D hes Improvement., mprov er `1010 er a ilorr ellnor a f heir 1Mi0.01 against 0 Moe ,o,,Ind001D0,I*0n., dP 1.,d1,en0011oi,ane a. .0010 mineral royalties ^EIV Dad TomOif,`.10me4211111196m 1:mother :..ppr One 10,11ng 5,oyyl1n01the 0,*rte0 ny °, mean y 4 pet o r Id mliol a AAervlheds.BmtrAlu' A Codela.°15m1aen vel M1, t m Aceae 7;1:.'1,r° :ale °whn n ep` °J ml a VmpeM n, ,Ind •a N t 4uv 1 me r 1wnlxm a0m•rn ,',I ei^9. by q0t Aimiw 0, n•,e n lin, Iis01x ae Roceetl0`AIl Im`01 t0''Ithc olrglol v el 9TtlePeTPIor0ry Y 050 rY PoOei er drT a ire Prop° air.dod'In9`e111vnhoet limn... Bthe Tama 000000 andCharges nDkthaleaP a see° 510 Pmenyes. lua9me .. a sMAr 0m made r^ Geu Saint i^ connection with a Casualty to the PropeM, Mimi Certiorari. All eefu its bate a0,r i connection n ac P.M., m 11 menta . NI pr0u.ae 01140 convection.11°^04 v mvOluntary, of any c15e a x01420 mdudin& with10ut Ilmutiom :,seam POog:111 .1 "1:'4 mlmrn`rgn .;',:,in ,, °goading n eons the intern, or 501lied P.M i Iml Ri6Ms. The 11ght r r name ata 1 ::hall of Oeblat to •1oea n 011 d a ens oM,,i 1 P rtan0c, ri mu e .rla^e,see•Derm ts.l' ansa, glans, strci tom ^d other document now O0 helean•r entered int, Lh0 01 l9; Ill t thememv TO M1e en a owned re DebDebl r in and , en a 0� a .14,00 0 else Lane a^*can pan 5.1001 and t bxnvemm0 Or 0110 business of +05111,0,,0,0.0 On [h nil °II a9nu 0 11 rte 5.104^ 1 0I. NI'I OI Neuse,oapPvloa 9'11 r6n opeau'n Omryy yaum p*0' Land and 0m part 511091 ane all '2060 510 and (mart of Debtor 501014 and Nereundlr, induttin0. 11,59.1 Emotion, 510 right, upon 5a happelting 1 en deftuR nerwnder, to receive and .Ilea an Me t0 Oeh 0 t I lergte Saidsal ,,02 b AM and all other t0 rinds 01 Demon In and 5 the hems set forth in of la) through Ill above. 5016 sale w0 b• made 2020201040 t0 and in order n .511 the terms 0 ,1 Final Judgment01 400 o0+ure. Aary person 601.11420 an Imerxl in 510 aumlua ham i rae, :1 ala. °500,,..010 ,1P'''''' 0. owner 40150 dale o.Oe Ir•^bias must ,• a claim within 60 days rhe, the saleeew, 5l it .1 150, day 1 February, 3016. Rxpela2 111111 1104 DeN•e D. 52*1( 011 13.'”' D. De0POw5lt 1110003 Florida By NO.: 96]2 Po(mary Emai0 da 1140 S,,l Se0 04,. Email: 1 utchih,lo a 1.54 kited*. Nardell� f 7:r Flmd+ Ber No.: 512s6i3 Primary Email: mnerdell.Bbun.lom 5.0,446,11 Emar*, ,hutdiins10n9bu .nm BUPA B FORMAN IIP 220 5. Ornpe A1mue, Suin 900 Orl•ne0. FL 3391 TdepnOne. 60)14 669 F,xlmile: )-5.66661 ATTOPNEYS FOR PIAINNFF ,... __ __.:_..._,........e.I.a ..... ..a ry eves sa 510 motsian of <en0in assistance. Please unto DreTr'r9' F o 2000, with 0(a9lieu: 2 yo • p o A5 0 di0ad24! who nedr .ly tcr9r9"9 asi°n , On0,, Lo f - 10 l0 Ah.he oulen05 yyC4oMAnvOrfv2s505a01 Country u n�1 Club eb Drivare eenne a140140on SSt. 1100. 021 ]10. 86, 1113190)J31a , .� . ,,, t rCN3619420 ndian River County Planning Depa... Section-Page-Zone(s): NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA 0 0 0 111 0 0 Ad Number: Insertion Number: Monday, March 09, 2015 TCP ALM. COM CLASSIFIED :90' Ni NB Cc FI, an IN MONDAY, MARCH 9, 2015 • SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS • 11 Rob INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray, Jr. Coastal Engineer SUBJECT: DATE: DEPARTMENTA Presentation of the Indian River County 2014 Beach Preservation Plan Update March 17, 2015 Indian River County developed and adopted its first comprehensive Beach Preservation Plan (BPP) in 1988, which included a management strategy for addressing coastal erosion along the County's 22.4 miles of shoreline. The BPP has been subsequently updated in 1998 and 2008. On March 19, 2011, a public workshop was held to discuss and identify additional strategies to abate the erosional effects on the County shoreline other than the traditional methods of pumping or trucking sand to the beach. During the public workshop several recommended beach management strategies were discussed including the use of coastal structures (breakwaters, groins, etc.). It was later determined that an update to the BPP was warranted and should include coastal modeling studies to determine if coastal structures could be a cost effective strategy for future County beach management. On October 22, 2013, the Board approved a contract with CB&I Coastal Planning and Engineering for professional coastal engineering services related to updating the County Beach Preservation Plan. The subject of this agenda item is to report that the 2014 Update to the BPP is complete and will be presented to the Board during the March 24, 2015 Board meeting. The BPP is an advisory document only, and approval does not commit the County to any specific action. However, following the presentation staff requests a supporting motion to approve and adopt the 2014 Update to the BPP. The main goals of the 2014 BPP update include: • Avoid adverse impacts to environmental resources including nearshore Hardbottom • Assess the vulnerability of upland property up to a 30 -year storm event • Quantify the damages due to shoreline retreat over the next 30 years • Determine the recreational value of beaches F:\PUBLIC WORKS\JAMESG\BPP UPDATE 2013-14\AGENDA ITEM\BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN 2014 UPDATE - AGENDA ITEM TO APPROVE 3-24-15.DOCX 91 Page 2 Departmental Agenda Item for 03-24-15 BCC Meeting 2014 Update to the Beach Preservation Plan March 17, 2015 Some of the highlights of the BBP update include: • Indian River County beaches draw over 1.9 million beach visits each year generating an annual recreational value of approximately $33.1 million, • The County's beach management efforts over the last decade have been successful and the shoreline has advanced an average of 2.6 feet/year compared to an estimated 1.0 feet/year retreat without nourishment, • Several beach management alternatives were evaluated including no action, beach fill, and use of coastal armoring structures; concluding that the beach fill alternative is the lowest, most cost-effective strategy for future beach management, • An overview of potential funding sources to implement the plan, and • Beach -related expenditures by the County, State and Federal agencies, and Sebastian Inlet District over the past 14 years was estimated at $6.8 Million annually. The annual cost to implement all beach management strategies under this 2014 plan is estimated at $8.2 Million, compared to the 2008 BPP update annual expense to implement of $7.9 Million. FUNDING Local funding of Beach Restoration includes a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax Revenue as well as allocation of the One Cent Sales Tax. No funding is required to approve the 2014 Update to the Beach Preservation Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the 2014 Update to the Beach Preservation Plan. In additional to staff recommendation, on March 16, 2015, the County's Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee made a supporting motion recommending approval of the 2014 BPP Update. ATTACHMENTS The executive summary of the 2014 update to the Beach Preservation Plan is enclosed. However the complete document can be viewed at the County's Coastal Engineering office. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR March 24, 2015 /' BY is.,• v,1 r r F:\PUBLIC WORKS\JAMESG\BPP UPDATE 2013-14\AGENDA ITEM\BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN 2014 UPDATE - AGENDA ITEM TO APPROVE 3-24-15.DOCX Indian River County Approved Date Administration Paill 1 3319 i5 41411 -411,Budget Legal y N r 3- a ISS Public Works C)•"--3/47/,5 Coastal Engr. Division U06 3b1 /-S 92 Beach Preservation Plan Indian River County Prepared for: Indian River County 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 Prepared bv: CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. 2481 NW Boca Raton Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33431 February 2015 93 BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Prepared for: Indian River County Indian River County, Florida Prepared by: CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. February 2015 94 BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Indian River County, Florida includes approximately 22.4 miles of Atlantic coastline, of which 15.7 miles are listed as critically eroded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The County's coast extends south from Sebastian Inlet to a point approximately 6 miles north of Fort Pierce Inlet. To assist with its coastal management strategies and the long term sustainability of its shoreline, the County adopted its first Beach Preservation Plan (BPP) in 1988. This is the third update to the BPP, and follows the 1998 and 2008 BPP updates. The County's beaches are an important economic engine for Indian River County. There are over 1.9 million beach visits each year to the County's beaches with a recreational value of approximately $33.1M. Of this, oceanside hotels generate approximately $16M in revenue annually and rely on the beaches to draw guests. The County began placing sand on the beach in 1978 and since that time approximately 3.55 million cubic yards have been placed. Of this volume, approximately 2.29 million cubic yards have been placed within the first 3 miles of shoreline south of Sebastian Inlet. The bypassing of sand and its placement along the beaches to the south has helped to maintain the natural transport and input of sediment into Indian River County. The remaining 1.26 million cubic yards have been placed elsewhere in the County to repair storm damages and address historic erosional "hot" spots. The County's beach management efforts over the last decade have been successful and the shoreline has advanced an average of 2.6 feet/year compared to an estimated 1.0 feet/year retreat without nourishment. The shoreline is divided into eight planning sectors to reflect physical and jurisdictional boundaries. The following strategies are recommended for the various sectors: • Sectors 1 and 2 - Beach fill - Support Sebastian Inlet District's ongoing bypassing efforts. • Sectors 3, 4 and 5 - Beach fill (which includes dune restoration) • Sector 6 - No action. This sector is historically stable. • Sector 7 - Beach fill with public beach access. The analysis suggests that the most cost effective solution in Sector 7 is a no action plan. However, no recreational benefits were accrued in Sector 7 because of the lack of public beach access and parking. Public access with parking would address this and make projects eligible for State cost sharing. • Sector 8 - Beach fill in the northern half (Sector 8a). Beach -related expenditures by the County, State and Federal agencies, and SID over the past 14 years was estimated at $6.8M annually. The annual cost to implement this plan is estimated at $8.2M, of which the County's cost share would be $5.0M (Table ES -1). The County and its residents will still incur periodic damage from storms, with an estimated annualized cost of CB&I COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 95 $4.4M/year. However, the cost of no action (including Toss of land, property, taxes and recreational value) is $29.6M/year over the 30 -year period of analysis. A cost -to -benefit ratio was estimated as the indirect costs (= no action strategy — probable storm damage) divided by the direct project costs. The cost -to -benefit ratio of the plan was 3.1. This equates to $1 of direct project costs resulting in a $3.10 return on investment to the County and its residents. Table ES -1. Summary of Recommended Management Strategies Sector Recommended Strategy Re- nourishment Fill Interval Source (years) Annual Costs (Present Worth, Probable Direct Storm Project Damage S/year) No Action Strategy Cost -to- Bene St Ratio 1 Beach Fill Sand Bypass 4 $1,076,200 $62,000 $1,071,800 0.9 2 Beach Fill Upland 2 $1,185,200 $287,700 $1,598,200 1.1 3 Beach Fill Upland 7 $1,547,400 $1,234,700 $8,597,400 4.8 4 Beach Fill - Enhance Upland 7 $1,964,700 $363,800 $2,669,100 1.2 5 Beach Fill Upland 4 $637,100 $527,800 $11,709,300 17.6 6 No Action - - -- $0 - 7 Beach Fill (+ access) Offshore 6 $1,263,700 $1,765,000 $2,909,100 0.9 8 Beach Fill - Enhance Upland 11 $501,700 $110,000 $1,074,500 1.9 Total $8,176,000 $4,351,000 $29,629,400 3.1 This Plan was developed assuming that complete funding will be available for any selected alternative. A variety of funding options are available to the County and presented herein but historically the County's beach program has been funded by a combination of local and State funding. The Plan outlines cost benefit ratios for each sector that can assist the County in prioritizing funding if the full plan cannot be implemented. The Plan can be implemented in stages if full funding is not received but will result in an increase in damage costs. ii CB&I COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. County Attorney's Matters - B.C.C. 3.24.15 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY r Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorn DATE: March 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Legislative Update- Talking Points On March 17, 2015, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ("Board") requested that the County Attorney's Office draft talking points on the following topics: HB 41 & SB 154 — Hazardous Walking Conditions, HB 391 & SB 896 — Location of Utilities, HB 101 & SB 140 —Relating to Taxation and HB 681 & SB 516 — Health Coverage for Emergency Services. Once the Board approves the attached talking points, they will be distributed to our outside lobbyists and local delegation. Approved for Marc!: 24, 2015 BCC Meeting County Attorney's Matters COUNTY ATTORNEY Indian River Co. Approved Date Admin. ei X319 15" Co. Atty. I I, 1 Budget . 1 t 4 5 Department .- Risk Management --- 97 Oppose HB 101 & SB 140 Relating to Taxation • Currently, real properties used for commercial purposes are subject to State of Florida's 6 percent sales and use tax, as well as any of the eight local discretionary sales surtaxes authorized by statute. • Among other issues, the proposed legislation would reduce the sales tax rate on commercial leases by 1 cent from 6 cents to 5 cents. • The Revenue Estimating Conference analyzed the fiscal impact of the legislation and determined that it would lead to a tax revenue decrease of $275 million in Fiscal Year 2016-2017. • The reduction of the revenue from the state sales tax would negatively affect local governments who have the Local Government 1/2 Cent revenue sharing program and the County Revenue sharing program. • The proposed legislation would also negatively affect the revenues for those local jurisdictions that currently employ local discretionary sales taxes. • The Revenue Estimating Conference determined that the impact to local funds, due to revenue sharing, would be $31.5 million, annually. • Indian River County, alone, estimates that the proposed legislation will have a negative fiscal impact on its revenue sharing programs of at least $173,897, annually. 98 Oppose HB 391 & SB 896 Location of Utilities • Florida law expressly provides, absent an agreement stating otherwise, a utility company is financially responsible for the removal or relocation of a utility line which is located upon, under, over, or along any public road and that unreasonably interferes in any way with the convenient, safe, or continuous use, or the maintenance, improvement, extension or expansion of the referenced road. • The proposed legislation would shift the burden from the utility companies to State of Florida and local governments to be financially responsible for removing or relocating utility lines located outside a designated public right- of-way but inside a public or private easement that unreasonably interferes with the safe continuous use, maintenance, improvement, extension or expansion of the road or rail corridor. • The legislation could have a significant financial impact on the local governments located on Florida's east coast due to the proposed high-speed rail project known as All Aboard Florida. • If successful, All Aboard Florida intends to lay at least one additional track from Miami, Florida to Cocoa Beach, Florida. Local governments have been working with representatives from Florida East Coast Railway, All Aboard Florida, Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Railroad Administration to identify the necessary improvements for a high- speed rail to operate on the Florida East Coast Railway Corridor. The improvements include expanding the impacted public roads operated by the State of Florida and by local governments. This would likely require the removal or relocation of utility lines that are located within the easements but not necessarily within the right-of-way limits of the public road. 99 Oppose HB 41 & SB 154 Hazardous Walking Conditions • Currently, the State of Florida must allocate funds to transport any public elementary school student (K-6 grade) who is subjected to a "hazardous walking condition" until either the hazard is corrected or a completion date is determined for correcting the hazard, whichever is occurs first. • Current law, however, does not require the entity with jurisdiction over the road having a hazardous walking condition to correct the condition. • The legislation proposes to expand the criteria for hazardous walking conditions such that there will be more designations of hazardous walking conditions in each community. • The legislation could create an unfunded mandate on local governments pursuant to Article VII, s. 18(a) of the Florida Constitution because it would require governmental entities with jurisdiction over a road with a hazardous walking condition to correct the condition within a reasonable period of time. • The proposed legislation would also allow School Boards to sue counties under Chapter 86, Florida Statutes, to determine if hazardous walking conditions exist. • Suggested Amendment(s): o Indian River County encourages you to support an amendment which would allow local flexibility via interlocal agreement between a school board and a local government. o Indian River County also encourages you to support an amendment which would remove the language that allows for a school board to bring a Chapter 86 action against a local government as the dispute resolution mechanism. 100 Oppose HB 681 & SB 516 Health Coverage for Emergency Services • State law establishes the provision of ambulance services as a core function of county government. • The proposed legislation would significantly reduce revenues received by county EMS departments and Emergency Services Districts. • Advance Life Support ("ALS") revenues are a fee for service charged to those who have a need for ambulance transport. ALS billing charges do not cover the cost of providing this service, nor does it make ambulance services a profitable enterprise. Rather, ALS billing charges serves as a mechanism to charge those who use the service in order to lessen the tax burden on all taxpayers for the cost of making advance life support available. • ALS revenues are the single largest revenue source for Indian River County's Emergency Services District outside of property taxes. • Currently Indian River County's Emergency Services receives a total of $5.3 million from the ALS revenue source. It is estimated that HB 681 and SB 516 would lead to a significant reduction of 10%-15% in ALS billing revenues for the Indian River County's Emergency Services District or $500,000-$800,000. • The revenue loss will result in either (1) a reduction in the level of service the Indian River County's Emergency Services District provides to the residents of Indian River County or (2) an increase in property taxes to make up for the loss in ALS revenues. 101 Oppose HB 101 & SB 140 Relating to Taxation i Mme. xnxw x.� +ai,ii.n. rei, ISL_ a Item # 13 14 By eputy Clerk • Indian River County estimates that the proposed legislation will have a negative fiscal impact on its revenue sharing programs of at least $173,897, annually. • The Revenue Estimating Conference analyzed the fiscal impact of the legislation and determined that it would lead to a tax revenue decrease of $275 million in Fiscal Year 2016-2017. This includes an estimated annual impact of $31.5 million to local funds due to revenue sharing. • Currently, real properties used for commercial purposes are subject to State of Florida's 6 percent sales and use tax, as well as any of the eight local discretionary sales surtaxes authorized by statute. • Among other issues, the proposed legislation would reduce the sales tax rate on commercial leases by 1 cent from 6 cents to 5 cents. • The reduction of the revenue from the state sales tax would negatively affect local governments who have the Local Government 1/2 Cent revenue sharing program and the County Revenue sharing program. • The proposed legislation would also negatively affect the revenues for those local jurisdictions that currently collect local discretionary sales taxes. RE VES T "7.7 ,,,". SPEr:."�' &nil Aq,aoL5 Oppose HB 681 & SB 516 Health Coverage for Emergency Services • It is estimated that HB 681 and SB 516 would lead to a significant reduction of 10%-15% in Advance Life Support ("ALS") billing revenues for the Indian River County's Emergency Services District. Indian River County's Emergency Services District currently receives approximately $5.3 million from the ALS revenue source. The proposed legislation would result in a negative impact of $500,000-$800,000. • The revenue loss will result in either (1) a reduction in the level of service the Indian River County's Emergency Services District provides to the residents of Indian River County or (2) an increase in property taxes to make up for the loss in ALS revenues. • State law establishes the provision of ambulance services as a core function of county government. • ALS revenues are a fee for service charged to those who have a need for ambulance transport. ALS billing charges do not cover the cost of providing this service, nor does it make ambulance services a profitable enterprise. Rather, ALS billing charges serves as a mechanism to charge those who use the service in order to lessen the tax burden on all taxpayers for the cost of making advance life support available. RECEIVE AT IRC -RCC MEETING Linerr h Aqi (-)ni Date Item # B Oppose HB 41 & SB 154 Hazardous Walking Conditions Deputy Cler • Currently, the State of Florida must allocate funds to transport any public elementary school student (K-6 grade) who is subjected to a "hazardous walking condition" until either the hazard is corrected or a completion date is determined for correcting the hazard, whichever is occurs first. • Current law, however, does not require the entity with jurisdiction over the road having a hazardous walking condition to correct the condition. • The legislation proposes to expand the criteria for hazardous walking conditions such that there will be more designations of hazardous walking conditions in each community. • The legislation could create an unfunded mandate on local governments pursuant to Article VII, s. 18(a) of the Florida Constitution because it would require governmental entities with jurisdiction over a road with a hazardous walking condition to correct the condition within a reasonable period of time. • The proposed legislation would also allow School Boards to sue counties under Chapter 86, Florida Statutes, to determine if hazardous walking conditions exist. • Suggested Amendment(s): o Indian River County encourages you to support an amendment which would allow local flexibility via interlocal agreement between a school board and a local government. o Indian River County also encourages you to support an amendment which would remove the language that allows for a school board to bring a Chapter 86 action against as the dispute resolution mechanism. 101 4-3 Oppose HB 391 & SB 896 Location of Utilities RECEIVED AT IRC -BCC MEET IMB • The proposed legislation would shift the burden from the utility companies to State of Florida and local governments to be financially responsible for removing or relocating utility lines located outside a designated public right- of-way but inside a public or private easement that unreasonably interferes with the safe continuous use, maintenance, improvement, extension or expansion of the road or rail corridor. • The legislation could have a significant financial impact on the local governments located on Florida's east coast due to the proposed high-speed rail project known as All Aboard Florida. • If successful, All Aboard Florida intends to lay at least one additional track from Miami, Florida to Cocoa Beach, Florida. Local governments have been working with representatives from Florida East Coast Railway, All Aboard Florida, Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Railroad Administration to identify the necessary improvements for a high- speed rail to operate on the Florida East Coast Railway Corridor. The improvements include expanding the impacted public roads operated by the State of Florida and by local governments. This would likely require the removal or relocation of utility lines that are located within the easements but not necessarily within the right-of-way limits of the public road. MI 14 --11 i County Attorney's Matters - B.C.C. 3.2 .15 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: March 13, 2015 SUBJECT: Request for Closed Attorney -Client Session Relating to Ocean Concrete and George Maib vs. Indian River County (Case No.: 20071589-CA17) BACKGROUND. A mediation session was held in Ocean Concrete and George Maib vs. Indian River County on February 12, 2015. The session raised issues relating to settlement negotiations, upon which the County Attorney desires advice. Thus, in accordance with Section 286.011(8), Florida Statutes the County Attorney requests that the Board schedule a closed attorney-client session to be held on April 14, 2015 in the County Commissioners' Conference Room. The attendees at the session will be the Board, the County Administrator, the County Attorney, and a certified court reporter. Reasonable public notice will be given of the session. It is estimated that the session will last approximately 30 minutes. RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney recommends that the Board schedule a closed attorney-client session to occur at 10:30 AM on April 14, 2015. APPROVED FOR MARCH 24, 2015 B.C.C. MEETING — ATTORNEY'S MATTERS COUNTY ATTORNEY F:L9mrneylindoCENERALi13 C CAgenda AlemaeOcean Concrete La.. it -Shade Mig Request dot: 102 Indian River Co. Approved Date Admin I r# 31/1/15 Co. Atty. I ' 1 k3 Budget f 7 Dept. - - --- Risk Mgr. -- --- 102 Emergency Services District - B.C.C. 3.24.15 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dylan Rein old CountyAttorney �� Y g Y DATE: March 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Potential Lawsuit Challenging U.S. Department of Transportation's Approval of the Issuance of $1,750,000,000 of Tax Exempt Private Activity Bonds for All Aboard Florida BACKGROUND On March 17, 2015, the Indian River County Board of County. Commissioners authorized the County Attorney to file a lawsuit to challenge the determination of the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation ("DOT") to allocate private activity bond authority for the issuance of $1,750,000,000 of tax exempt bonds for the Project. DOT's determination was made on December 22, 2014, and thus well before the Federal Railroad Administration ("FRA") completed the process of evaluating the environmental and historic resource impacts of the Project, and considering reasonable alternatives to the Project and/or mitigation to avoid or minimize such impacts, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA"), Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 ("Section 4(f)"), and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ("Section 106"). The FRA published a Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS") for the Project in September 2014, but as of the date of this memorandum, has not yet published the FEIS or Record of Decision required by NEPA or made any findings under Section 4(1) or Section 106. Accordingly, it is very clear that these processes were not completed as of December 22, 2014. The suit will among other things allege that DOT's action on December 22, 2014 was unlawful because it was made prior to the completion of the review process required by the foregoing statutes. The complaint would be filed in federal court. We expect that DOT and All Aboard Florida would vigorously contest the suit. It is estimated that the budget for the litigation, exclusive of any appeals, is approximately $600,000. The County Attorney's Office is requesting that the Board authorize the inclusion of the Emergency Services District as a plaintiff in such lawsuit. WrvrnrylLi.do1GENERALO CCWge la Memo.Wll Aboard Florida Levwli- Emergency Servic. D.niecdoc 103 Board of County Commissioners March 17, 2015 Page Two FUNDING The funding for this litigation would come from the general fund. RECOMMENDATION The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Chair allow for public comment on this matter and then have the Board vote to authorize the County Attorney's Office to include the Emergency Services District as a plaintiff in the complaint challenging the U.S. Department of Transportation's approval of the issuance of the tax exempt private activity bonds for All Aboard Florida. Approved for March 24, 2015 BCC Meeting Emergency Services District COUNTY ATTORNEY F:UttomryltindaiGENERALIB C CLIgenda MemoslAilAboard Florida uis- Eeusyrnq Services Dittsiadoc 104 Indian River Co. A t 'roved Date Admin. /�;,') 9 / Co. Atty. e •t i Budget i fp Department Risk Management U i -- 104 i5A.3 Emeryne 1&vCQS March 24, 2015 Emergency Item Commissioners Matters 14.D.t INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: March 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Remediation Efforts in Fire Stations FROM: Peter O'Bryan Commissioner, District 4 Request Board discussion and direction to Staff to accelerate remediation efforts in fire stations. Discussion may also include options for temporary housing. Thank you. 1 D5 RECEIVE AT IRC -BCC I`,�"'ETIPIG _Diarch8 90 By Ota 010-1(2040 Deputy t>erk FIRE STATIONS INSPECTION REPORTS Jason Brown I oto Fire Station 10 Repair & Remediation Timeline Date Action May 23, 2014 Union requests to have their outside consultant inspect various stations. July 10, 2014 County hires AMEC to conduct inspection of Stations 1, 7, 10, and 11. BCC approves budget amendment to fund roof replacements at Stations 10 and 11 in the total July 15, 2014 amount of $100,000. July 21, 2014 County advertises roof repairs for Station 10 (and 11) for bid. September 9, 2014 BCC approves contract for roof replacement with The Roof Authority in the amount of $31,995. September 18, 2014 County receives final report from AMEC on Station 10. November 20, 2014 The Roof Authority submits invoice for final payment on roof replacement. With the roof replacement complete, County is able to move forward with other remediation activities. December 3, 2014 County receives first worker's compensation claim relating to alleged IAQ issues at Station 10. December 15, 2014 report with Contract Services in the amount of $49,020. County enters into contract for remedial actions in accordance with recommendation in AMEC December 18, 2014 December 19, 2014 January 8, 2015 Claimant's attorney requests that the County allow them to conduct independent tests at the station related to the alleged injury. County notifies Contract Services to stop work at Station 10 in order for the claimant's attorney to have outside inspections conducted as requested. County notifies Contract Services to halt all work at Stations 10 and 11 at recommendation of counsel as Union has mentioned additional claims and a recent news report of potential problems at Station 1, 7, 10, and 11. Management provides notice that work has stopped "pending the likely inspection/testing that January 14, 2015 may occur at the request of the parties initiating...litigation" posted at all stations by the Captain. Management sends copy of notice that work has stopped "pending the likely January 14, 2015 inspection/testing that may occur at the request of the parties initiating...Iitigation" to all bargaining unit employees via email. Claimant's attorney provides scope of inspections that they would like to have performed at January 26, 2015 Station 10. These include many inspections that do not appear to relate to the claimant's alleged injury (e.g. noise level decibel analysis, bedbugs, structural testing, etc.). County's outside counsel notifies claimant's attorney that we disagree with the scope of testing January 26, 2015 requested. County provides formal response to claimant's attorney challenging scope of requested February 16, 2015 inspections as most are not related to the alleged injury (noise/decibel level testing, structural analysis, bed bugs, etc.). February 26, 2015 Management files motion with the Court to make a determination on scope of testing at Station 10 due to lack of response from claimant's attorney. Draft F:\Budget\Jason\Fire\Station 10 Timeline 3/10/2015 I 0 �l 10 September 2014 Ms. Beth Martin — Risk Manager Risk Management Division Indian River County 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-0310 ame Phone: +1 (772) 567-8000 Ext 1287 Email: bmartin@ircgov.com Subject: Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment Indian River County Fire Station #1 1500 Old Dixie Highway Vero Beach, Florida AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Dear Ms. Martin: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) has completed the Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Assessment requested by Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM) at Fire Station #1. The field survey including spore trap air sampling was performed by Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens, Industrial Hygienist Technician on 23 July 2014. Our field services for this limited inspections and IAQ Assessment were conducted in general accordance with AMEC Proposal 14PROP0010.6380.0349, Revision 1, dated 10 July 2014 and as authorized by Purchase Order #69508-00. AMEC appreciates the opportunity to have been of assistance to you on this project and is looking forward to working with you as your consultant in the future. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. Ronald C. Trapane, M Program Manager , CIEC Lisa M. Prieto, P.E. Russell E. Stauffer, P. Orlando Office Manager CIEC Mold Assessor #MRSA -2010 Attachments: Building Plan Photographs Laboratory Reports P:16380 (EQIPROJECTS12014-Projects11233 IRC Four Fire StationslStation #111233 Report Station#1.docx Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 75 East Amelia Street, Suite 200 Orlando, Florida 32801 USA Tel +1 (407) 522-7570 Fax +1 (407) 522-7576 ion 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #1 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION Information concerning this project was obtained from a request for proposal dated 6 June 2014 from Ms. Beth Martin with Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM). Additional information was obtained at a meeting held on July 22, 2014 at IRCRM office. The meeting was attended by Ms. Beth Martin (Risk Manager), Mr. John King (Fire Chief), Mr. Brian Burkeen (Assistant Chief), Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens with AMEC. Mr. Burkeen accompanied us during our inspection and provided additional information during the inspection. The fire station was reportedly built in 1983 with an addition in 1986 and consists of approximately 10,186 gross square feet. A plan depicting the building layout is attached. The building was reportedly repainted within the last year and the roof shingles were replaced in 2005. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work for this project included the following tasks: Task 1 - Site Visit, Observations, and Comfort Parameter Screening Our services for this task included a site visit to conduct visual observations and obtaining selected indoor air quality measurements within the fire station. The comfort parameter and other measurements, consisting of carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and airborne particulates, were compared with ASHRAE, OSHA, and NIOSH, standards to establish the conditions in the subject area at the time of the evaluation. Measurements were collected in numerous locations within the subject area, as well as outside the fire station, for baseline comparison purposes. Task 2 — Heating, Ventilation, and Air -Conditioning (HVAC) System Observation AMEC conducted a visual observation of the HVAC systems serving each area of each building. Our services included a walk-through of the interior spaces and mechanical areas with the person responsible for the maintenance of the system to observe the operation, general maintenance and housekeeping characteristics of the associated HVAC systems. The interiors of representative air handler units were observed. Task 3 — Microbial Sampling In order to assess the potential presence or absence of mold amplification, AMEC collected a total of five spore trap air samples from inside representative areas of the building, and two outside samples for comparative purposes. The samples were sent to an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory and analyzed for viable and non-viable fungi. Laboratory analysis of the spore trap air samples included basic (outside) and expanded (inside) fungal analysis using direct optical microscopy. The expanded (interior) analysis included insect parts, skin cell fragments, fibers (fiberglass, cellulose, etc.) and inorganic particles, useful to indicate if current housing keeping measures are sufficient/effective at the fire station. The spore trap samples were collected on spore trap (air -o -cell) utilizing a calibrated high volume - sampling pump. The sample results are included in our report and were compared against industry guidelines and recommendations. Sampling to address infectious disease control was beyond our scope of services. tog 3 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #1 Report of Limited Inspections and IndoorAir Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Task 4 — Moisture Intrusion Assessment (Protimeter and Infra -Red Camera) Our services for this task included a site visit to observe building finishes in order to evaluate if areas were impacted by moisture intrusion and to confirm the presence or absence of suspect visible mold growth. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. We performed non-destructive testing for elevated moisture content of representative finishing materials using a Protimeter moisture meter. Task 5 — Structural Integrity Assessment Our services for this task included a site visit to observe the visible existing structural framing and assess areas of distress or indications of Toss of structural integrity. This task was conducted by a Florida Professional Engineer (PE) specializing in Structural Engineering. If available we reviewed original construction plans prior to our assessment. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. Task 6 - Report Preparation At the completion of our site visits, a report was prepared to summarize the information obtained. This report discussed our visual observations, Protimeter evaluations, and the results of our comfort parameter screening measurements and airborne microbial sampling results. 3.0 FINDINGS 3.1 Visual Observations Exterior • Earthen embankments are located along the north and south sides of the building and there is a planter with earth against the exterior wall by the entry. A portion of the soil has washed away exposing the waterproofing on the sides of the building. • Cracks in the stucco are visible at the intersection of the tall parapet walls and apparatus bay walls. • Gutters are loose and joints are unsealed at multiple locations. • No downspouts to divert rain water away from building. • The vent cover for the stove vent is missing. • There are cracks in the stucco above the front storage room and moisture intrusion through the cast -in-place concrete walls at the same location. • There is an active leak at a roof drain penetration near the front apparatus bay doors. Interior • There is evidence of previous moisture intrusion at the front entry door. • There are stains on numerous ceiling tiles and numerous tiles appear to have been previously replaced. • Numerous diffusers have suspect visible mold growth (SVM) and/or rust. • SVM is present on the exterior wall of the Lieutenant's office where the wallpaper was removed. l [0 4 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 • The condensate line recently overflowed and flooded the Battalion Chief's office. The carpet was replaced and a temporary pump has been placed on the condensate drain Zine. • Doors from the administration areas to the apparatus bay don't have weather stripping. • The bathroom exhaust fans are not ducted to the exterior, they exhaust into the attic space. • The insulation on some of the supply air ducts in the attic is loose and wet. • The weather stripping on the entry door into the Ready Room is worn. • There is evidence of previous moisture intrusion at the front entry door to the Ready Room. • There is black SVM on the wall in the front office adjacent to the Ready Room. • Dust, dirt, cobweb, insect debris, etc. and evidence of previous moisture intrusion were observed under the kitchen sink. • There is evidence of previous moisture intrusion in men's bathroom #1. • There is active moisture intrusion above the gear room. The leak is apparently at the intersection of the parapet wall and low slope roof area above the apparatus bay. • There is evidence of previous moisture intrusion at the vents in the parapet walls above the low slope roof area above the apparatus bay. • The fiberglass batt insulation above the ceiling tiles has been moved out of position in numerous locations. There is no indication that an "air barrier exists between the conditioned occupied spaces and the vented attic. If an effective air barrier is not present, un -conditioned, hot humid air (particularly during the summer months) from the vented attic is allowed to come into contact with the metal ducts and supply/return components and ceiling tiles which are cooled by the HVAC for the occupied spaces below. This condition can be exacerbated by low thermostat set points (typically well below 72 degrees Fahrenheit) in the occupied areas. Painted drywall/joint compound walls and suspended acoustical tile ceiling with fiberglass batt insulation above are typically not air barriers as defined by Florida Building Code (FBC). The lack of an effective air barrier can result in condensation control issues, moisture vapor control issues, and higher heatinq and cooling costs. HVAC • AHU in Battalion Chief office and Dorm #1 showed signs of Suspect Visible Mold (SVM) at coils and fibreglass insulation, unit also had visible signs of rust and moisture associated with coils, the air filter was clean, pleated and marked with change date. • AHU in Ready Room has dust and dirt at filter housing, unit was dry and had a clean, pleated filter marked with change date. • AHU above ceiling in Dorm #2 showed No visible signs of SVM or moisture. 3.2 Moisture Screening Moisture testing was conducted by using a Protimeter non-destructive moisture meter to evaluate the presence and extent of elevated moisture within representative interior door and window areas. AMEC also obtained moisture readings from representative window sills and walls around walls and doors that showed evidence of cracking or deterioration. 5 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station /1 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 The Protimeter `Probe Mode" readings, ranging from 0 to 14 wood moisture equivalent (WME) are considered to have "Air Dry Conditions" and are consistent with typical wallboard in office environments which has not been impacted by elevated moisture. Readings ranging from 15 to 19 are considered to be "At Risk" for moisture problems. Readings 20 and above indicate moisture content typical of finishes which have been impacted by moisture intrusion. The results of our surface moisture readings are summarized in the following Table No. 1. •Surface Moisture Readings ......... . Location / Suspect Visible Mold (SVM) . Protimeter Readings (WME) Conditions Interior — Captains Office, under window 10.0 Air Dry Interior— Around main entry door, wall bases 19.2 At Risk Interior- Lieutenants office, side of window 12.9 Air Dry Interior — Battalion chiefs office, under window 31.6 Moisture Intrusion Interior — Battalion chiefs office, carpet/floor (outside A/C closet) 9.2 Air Dry Interior — Medical supply room, under window 11.6 Air Dry Interior — EMS Superintendent/storage room, side of window 12.4 Air Dry Interior— Administrative area, wall around water fountain 18.8 At Risk Interior — Ladies Restroom 12.1 Air Dry Interior — Men Restroom 11.2 Air Dry Interior — Ready Room, around entry door 12.1 Air Dry Interior — Ready Room, under window 8.9 Air Dry Interior — Vacant office, next to kitchen 12.1 Air Dry Interior — 2"° vacant office off kitchen 11.1 Air Dry Interior —kitchen, around entry door 11.8 Air Dry Interior—kitchen, around window 10.5 Air Dry Interior—Isolated room in 2nd Dorm area, around window 9.8 Air Dry Interior- 2' Dorm area, wall around exit/entry door 15.8 At Risk Interior -1st Dorm area, around windows 14.0 Air Dry Interior -151 Dorm area, around exit/entry door 11.9 Air Dry The moisture meter survey confirmed that drywall "moisture intrusion" issues. In addition, four other "At content" are also noted/bolded in Table No. 1 in Battalion Chiefs office, under window, has Risk" locations with "above -background moisture 6 3.3 Comfort Parameter Screening 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Testing for the basic comfort parameters (carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and particulates) associated with indoor air quality was also conducted within interior finished areas. For comparison purposes, testing was also conducted at locations outside of the fire station. Temperature and relative humidity were monitored during AMEC's site visit with a TSI Q -Trak 8550 hand—held hygrometer/thermometer. Temperature Levels Temperature and relative humidity levels can be considered as indicators of the HVAC system's ability to handle building thermal loads. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has not established temperature and relative humidity limits. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 55-2004, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, recommends that summertime (mechanical cooling) temperatures are maintained between 73 and 79 degrees Fahrenheit, and that wintertime (mechanical heating) temperatures are maintained between 68 and 74 degrees Fahrenheit. At the time the site visit was conducted the outside temperature was measured at 77 degrees Fahrenheit so ASHRAE summertime guidelines are referenced. During the site visit, the temperature thermostats of fire station was set at 70 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the Chief/Admin area, with confirmatory readings from the TSI Q -Trak at 73.6 degrees F, the Ready Room was set at 75 degrees F and confirmed at 71.8 degrees F, the 1st Dorm/Kitchen area thermostat was set at 69 degrees F and confirmed at 71.4 degrees F and the 2nd Dorm area thermostat was set at 69 degrees F and confirmed at 70.6 degrees F.. Relative Humidity Levels The ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, notes that ... Relative humidity in habitable spaces preferably should be maintained between 30% and 60% relative humidity to minimize growth of allergenicor pathogenic organisms. The Standard also notes that ... if the relative humidity in occupied spaces and low velocity ducts and plenums exceeds 70%, fungal contamination (for example, mold, mildew, etc) can occur. Relative humidity should be maintained between 30 to 60 percent during all seasons, since humidity above 60 percent may contribute to the growth of mold and bacteria on porous indoor surfaces. Carbon Dioxide Levels CO2 readings were obtained from both inside and outside as part of the evaluation process. Current guidelines provided in the ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, is calculated by adding 700 parts per million (ppm) to the carbon dioxide concentration level measured outside the building and was used as the basis for our evaluation. This calculation corresponds to an outdoor air intake of 15-20 cubic feet per minute (CFM), per person. Therefore, the exterior CO2 value establishing a target value of 1,083 for CO2 (383 + 700 = 1,083 ppm). The results of our comfort parameter readings are summarized in the following Table No. 2. 1(3 7 • 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 ' ' Location `.. Date .. Time CO2 (ppm) ;(F.) Temp Relative Humidity (%) .. Target Values g 1,083 (383 + 700) 73-79 (summertime) 30-60 Inside - Captains office 7/23/14 1:24p 619 77.8 47.1 Inside - Captains office, above ceiling tiles 7/23/14 544 74.7 70.6 Inside -Conference room 7/23/14 1:27p 596 75.2 52.4 Inside - Storage room/Main entry 7/23/14 1:30p 572 71.9 57.4 Inside- Lieutenants office 7/23/14 1:40p 570 73.0 58.4 Inside - Battalion Chiefs office 7/23/14 1:45p 582 69.2 61.0 Inside - Medical supply room 7/23/14 1:57p 603 72.6 58.2 Inside - Storage room (next to conference room). 7/23/14 2:01p 671 73.0 58.1 Inside -Weight room 7/23/14 2:04p 635 73.9 57.9 EMS Superintendent office 7/23/14 2:10p 945 74.0 56.8 EMS Superintendent office, above ceiling tiles 7/23/14 2:11p 613 74.3 68.4 Inside -storage room next to EMS Superintendents office 7/23/14 2:13p 727 73.2 55.9 Inside I.T/Storage next to Superintendents office 7/23/14 2:16p 682 73.6 59.7 Inside -Hallway 7/23/14 2:18p Inside -Hallway, above ceiling tiles 7/23/14 2:19p 688 75.0 69.5 Inside -Ladies restroom 7/23/14 2:21p 653 74.5 57.1 Inside -Men restroom 7/23/14 2:23p 677 74.1 57.9 Inside -Ready Room 7/23/14 2:26p 1091 71.8 47.8 Inside -Vacant office next to kitchen 7/23/14 2:35p 1156 70.4 50.2 Inside -2"d Vacant office off kitchen 7/23/14 2:38p 1084 70.6 48.1 Inside -Kitchen 7/23/14 2:42p 914 71.3 54.3 Inside -1St Dorm area (off kitchen) 7/23/14 2:45p 850 71.4 54.6 Inside -2nd Dorm area 7/23/14 2:48p 709 70.6 57.0 Inside -Men restroom 7/23/14 2:56p 1116 70.3 53.5 Inside -Ladies restroom@ Dorm 7/23/14 3:01p 918 70.4 51.1 Inside -Bath in Dorm Addition 7/23/14 3:05p 704 68.8 66.0 Outside -2"d Dorm area entry/exit77.1 door (to bay area). 7/23/14 3:15p 383 (In shade) 85.4 �a o.,• of repared By: CG. Results in bold indicate that test location measurements were not within ASHRAE recommended levels. iq 8 10 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #1 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Of the twenty six interior temperature readings obtained, 12 readings (ranging from 68.8 to 72.6 degrees F) were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels — possibly due to the thermostat settings and/or HVAC system inefficiencies. Of the twenty six interior Relative Humidity (%) readings obtained, 5 readings (ranging from 61.0% to 70.6% RH) were above ASHRAE recommended levels. (Above the ceiling tiles in the "above" space.) Of the twenty six interior carbon dioxide readings obtained 4 readings (ranging from 1084 to 1156) were above ASHRAE recommended levels — typically an indicator of HVAC system makeup air inefficiencies. 3.4 Mold Air Testing Seven air samples were obtained using spore trap (air -o -cell) within the fire station, while two samples were obtained from outside to the front and rear of the Administrative and Dorm Areas at the beginning and end of AMEC's site visit on 23 July 2014. The samples were returned, using chain of custody procedures to EMLab P&K Inc., an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory. The samples were analyzed for viable and non-viable fungal spores, skin cells, and mycelia fragments. Copies of the laboratory reports are attached to this report for your reference. Table 3 summarizes the results of the biological particle analysis: Table 3 - Spore Trap Results — Sample(1) Location TOTAL Spore Counts (m3) Predominant Type Spore Count (m3) (01-) Exterior — Administrative/Office area Total Exterior Spore Counts —15,374 (02-) Interior — Battalion Chief office Total Spore Counts — Non-detected No individual spore types exceeded the average respective outside sample levels (03-) Interior — Conference Room Total Spore Counts -147 No individual spore types exceeded the average respective outside sample levels (04-) Interior — Weight room Total Spore Counts -40 No individual spore types exceeded the average respective outside sample levels (05-) Interior — Ready Room Total Spore Counts -147 No individual spore types exceeded the average respective outside sample levels (06-) Interior — Kitchen Total Spore Counts - 220 No individual spore types exceeded the average respective outside sample levels 9 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #1 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Sample) Location TOTAL Spore Counts (m3) s Predominant Type Spore Count (m3) (07) Interior - Dorm Area Total Spore Counts - 7 Only de minimus individual spore types levels compared to the average outside samples (08-) Exterior — Dorm area. Total Exterior Spore Counts - 851 (04-) Interior — Weight Room (1) Sample numbers are listed in parentheses The guidance of the AIHA journal, Indoor Health, Background Levels of Fungi, July/August 2003 consensus opinion is that the indoor microbial levels should be below the outdoor levels with no difference in the interior type. The interior sample results did not indicate elevated microbial levels, when compared to the two outside samples, with only slight, de minimus variation at the Dorm/Bunk sample location. The laboratory analytical results are attached. As part of this scope we included expanded analysis of the interior spore trap air samples to include epithelial (skin) cells, and hyphal fragments. Table 4 summarizes the results of the expanded particle analysis: —Spore Trap Results —Expanded Particles Sample(2) Location Epithelial (Skin) Cells (Loading Factor: {lightest} 1 thru 4 {heaviest}) Hyphal Fragments (particles/m3) (02-) Interior— Battalion Chief office Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 Hyphal Fragments — 0 (03-) Interior — Conference Room Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 Hyphal Fragments - 7 (04-) Interior — Weight Room Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 1 Hyphal Fragments — 0 (05-) Interior— Ready Room Epithelial (Skin) Cells - 2 Hyphal Fragments - 7 (06-) Interior -Kitchen Epithelial (Skin) Cells - 2 Hyphal Fragments - 0 10 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quail tyAssessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Sample(2) Location Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs (Loading Factor: {lightest} 1 thru 4 {heaviest}) Hyphal Fragments (particles/m3) (07-) Interior —Dorm Area Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs - 1 Hyphal Fragments — 0 ample numbers are listed in parentheses There is no consensus opinion as to the indoor particle levels for skin cells or hyphal fragments. However, higher levels, relative to the other obtained results were noted in Conference Room and Ready Room — possibly indicative of ineffective housekeeping. The laboratory analytical results are attached. 3.4 Structural Integrity Assessment • Based upon our visual observations there was no indication of structural distress or damage. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our visual observations and test results we offer the following conclusions: • Dust, dirt, cobweb, insect debris, etc. were observed on horizontal surfaces (tables, window sills, window blinds, shelves, counter tops, fluorescent light covers, etc.) and greasy and dusty diffuser louvers & returns were noted in the building, indicating poor housekeeping. • The waterproofing on the exterior walls where soil abuts the wall is allowing moisture to penetrate to the interior of some of the offices based upon the amount of SVM found after the wall paper had been removed and the elevated moisture readings. • Visual evidence of both previous and current moisture intrusion through the roof indicate the existing roofing at the low sloped roof area has deteriorated. • Of the twenty six interior temperature readings obtained, 12 readings (ranging from 68.8 to 72.6 degrees F) were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels — possibly due to the thermostat settings and/or HVAC system inefficiencies. • Of the twenty six interior Relative Humidity (%) readings obtained, 5 readings (ranging from 61.0% to 70.6% RH) were above ASHRAE recommended levels. • Of the twenty six interior carbon dioxide readings obtained 4 readings (ranging from 1084 to 1156) were above ASHRAE recommended levels — typically an indicator of HVAC system makeup air inefficiencies • The interior spore trap air sample results did not indicate elevated microbial levels when compared to the two outside air samples. I 11 11 10 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station 111 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS As requested, AMEC has prepared the following recommendations for corrective actions based on the issues identified during our evaluation: 1. The soil abutting the exterior walls should be excavated and the waterproofing inspected and repaired and/or replaced as needed. The soil should be re -graded to insure the waterproofing is protected. 2. The roof leaks above the apparatus bay area and gear room should be repaired and/or the low sloped roofing should be replaced or coated. 3. The cracks in the exterior stucco should be repaired. 4. The gutters should be repaired and/or replaced as needed. 5. Provide downspouts or other means to divert rain water away from the building. 6. Replace missing vent cover at the stove exhaust vent. 7. Install weather-stripping to all doors between conditioned space and the exterior. 8. The fibreglass batt insulation should be returned to the proper locations. 9. The water -stained, SVM ceiling tiles and wet HVAC insulation should be replaced. Rusted louvers and metal components/grids should be replaced/repainted. Confirmation that all supply ducts are properly insulated, to reduce potential condensation issues, should also occur. 10. AMEC recommends inspection and cleaning of mold -impacted and dirty HVAC Units, ducts and components using a hypochlorite (10% bleach and water) solution, BBJ MicroBiocide, Oxine, EnviroCon, Fiberlock Shockwave, or Fosters 40-80. Remove and replace all mold or water -damaged HVAC or duct insulation. Note, all mold remediation activities are to be accomplished by experienced, properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, etal. 11. Since improperly conducted mold remediation activities can create additional issues, it is recommended that all mold remediation activities be accomplished by experienced, properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, etal. Additionally, third -party mold remediation monitoring and air testing should be conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the mold remediation contractor's activities. 12. Improve housekeeping to reduce visible dirt, dust, insect parts, etc. 13. AMEC recommends consulting with a licensed mechanical engineer or contractor to review the HVAC systems. It does not appear that the current systems can provide sufficient dehumidification to remove moisture during the system's cooling cycle, since some relative humidity readings were greater than 60%. If HVAC systems are sized incorrectly or are running inefficiently, this can lead to ineffective moisture control. 14. AMEC also recommends testing, adjusting, and balancing of the HVAC system components to determine if the HVAC system provides airflows that are in accordance with the design specifications. Additionally, confirm that temperature settings for the HVAC system are accurate and raise temperature levels in the location identified as below ASHRAE recommended guidelines. We also recommend the use of automated controls to ensure the temperature settings remain within the ASHRAE recommended guidelines. 12 10 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 15. Confirm that a proper air barrier has been installed between the conditioned finished space and the "naturally ventilated" plenum space above the dropped ceiling tiles and batting, in • order to prevent the potential for plenum moisture, in accordance with applicable Florida Building Code (Mechanical). Acceptable air barriers are generally made of durable, nonporous materials and are sealed to adjoining wall, ceiling or floor surfaces with suitable long -life mastics. 16. Follow up testing and inspections should be performed after the recommendations described above are completed. 6.0 LIMITATIONS AMEC has endeavored to observe the existing conditions within the finished areas of the Indian River County Fire Station #1 using generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of our assessment, there is always a possibility some areas were overlooked or inaccessible, or are different from those specific assessment locations. If conditions related to indoor air quality, other than those identified in this report, is identified in the subject spaces, AMEC should be contacted to evaluate the findings and conclusions in this report in light of the new information. This report is intended for the exclusive use of Indian River County Government. The findings are relative to the date of our site visit and should not be relied upon for substantially previous and/or later dates. `liq BUILDING PLAN 1 a, o MOISTURE INTRUSION A06A ACTIVE ROOF LEAK NEW DORMITORY (2ND) r LBOLrJ EMS SUPERNSORq MEDICAL SUPPLIE5— AC BATTALION CHIEF AARE OFFICE CAPTAIN'S OFICE� GEAR STORAGE/ ATTIC ACCESS AAw WIGHT ROOM STORAGE AAw a ROW EMPTY OFFICE MOISTURE DAMAGE BOTTOM SECTION OF WALL LEGEND A I SPORE TRAP LOCATIONS APPARATUS ROOM WOMEN'S ROOM AA07 MENS ROOM A AC AADS READY ROOM IST DORMITORY AA06 KITCHEN Of7CE OFFICE STATION 11 ®fLOOR PLAN SCALE NT.S ACTIVE ROOF LEAK SOD 1500 OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY VERO BEACH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERCENCY SERVICES INDIAN RT0I COUNTY, FLORIDA amec0 AY�MGGIC OFTI.�N 06 UCRIRE f. TIM INCI ti10 0.90101311 IMAM 10 are® sur nu SAMPLE LOCAT10N PUN slm Nwva lay PHOTOGRAPHS IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 1 Front Elevation Photo 3 Side elevation Photo 5 East side of building Crack in stucco Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 2 Planter next to entry Photo 4 North east corner of building, damaged gutter - no downspouts to divert water away from buildin Photo 6 South side of building, open joint in gutter 1 13 IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 7 Northeast corner -previously repaired crack in stucco Photo 9 Vent opening for stove- missing cover Photo 11 Storage room left of bay doors — evidence of previous water intrusion Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 8 South side of building, soil partially washed out, waterproofing exposed Photo 10 South side -gutter is loose Photo 12 Cracks in stucco — outside of wall seen in photo 11 2 L4 IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 13 Roofdnainnearfro/dbaydoom—naportedk/ leaks Photo 15 Entrydoor—evkjenoeofmoistuneintruoion.wuU paper loose Photo 17 Diffuser in captains office - SVM Taken July 23,20/4 Report Photo Log Photo 14 Apparatus bays Photo 16 Stainadoai|ingtUeoinemptyofficenexttoenbry door Photo 18 Lieutenant's office-waII paper recently removed 3 !RC Firo Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 19 Door from administratiOfl to apparatus bay—no Photo 21 Exhaust fan into attic space - restroom Photo 23 Diffuser in storage room - SVM Taken July 23,20/4 Report Photo Log Photo 20 Stained ceiling tile -conference room Photo 22 Loose duct insuation, moisture dripping from duct above conferenCe room and hall Photo 24 Stained ceiling tile -weight room 4 IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 25 Front door into ready room - weather-stripping is worn Diffuser in ready room- rust and SVM Photo 29 Under kitchen sink -evidence of previous moisture intrusion and SVM Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 26 Front door to ready room -evidence of previous moisture intrusion Photo 28 Front office next to ready room -SVM Photo 30 Men's restroom #1 -evidence of moisture damage and SVM 5 tai IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 638044-1233 Photo 31 Stained ceiling tile in Men's restroom #1 Photo 33 Diffuser in Battalion Chief's room — rust Photo 35 Moisture intrusion in gear room Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 32 Door from dormitory to apparatus bay- no weather-stripping and rust on frame Photo 34 Diffuser in dormitory — rust and SVM Photo 36 Moisture intrusion in attic above gear room (photo 35) 6 �a� IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 37 Evidence of previous moisture intrusion at attic vents Photo 39 Evidence of leakage at spigot in apparatus bay Photo 41 West interior wall @ main entry to Admin area Protimeter reading Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 38 Insulation out of position Photo 40 View of apparatus bay Photo 42 AHU in Battalion Chief office, S.V.M & rust 7 IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 43 S.V.M on Fiberglass insulation, AHU in Battalion Chief office Photo 45 Administrative area Q -track and Thermostat comparison r . 1• Photo 47 AHU in Ready room, visible signs of Dust & Dirt 1 Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 44 Protimeter reading, Battalion Chief office Under window Photo 46 AHU in Ready room Photo 48 AHU in Ready room, visible signs of Dust & Dirt 8 J30 IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 49 AHU in Dorm #1 Photo 51 Floor model A/C unit in Dorm #2 Photo 53 Overhead AHU in Dorm #2 Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 50 AHU in Dorm #1, SVM, rust & Lt moisture Photo 52 Floor model A/C unit in Dorm #2 Photo 54 Ready room, Q -track & thermostat comparison 9 13D IRC Fire Station #1 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 55 Dorm #1, Q -track and thermostat comparison Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 56 Dorm #2, Q -track and thermostat comparison 10 LABORATORY REPORTS EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab(@emsl.com Order ID: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: 341406389 AMECH25 C012301233 'Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River Fire Station #1 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/23 /2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/28/2014 • A• O CeII(TM') Anal sis of Fungal Spores &Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) Ie t f\G,JwIt. ir- Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: y 341406389-0001 A01-20486982 150 Exterior Admin/Office Area 341406389-0002 A02-20487025 150 Battalion Chief Office 341406389-0003 A03-20486913 150 Conference Rm Soore Tvoes Raw Cnunt Countlm3 0 of Total Raw Count Count/m"/, of Total Raw Count Count/ma a/ of Total Altemaria Ascospores Aspergillus/Penicillium Basidiospores Bipolaris++ Chaetomium Cladosporium Curvularia Epicoccum Fusarium Ganoderma Myxomycetes++ Pithomyces Rust Scopulariopsis Stachybotrys Torula Ulocladium Unidentifiable Spores Cercospora Nigrospora Pyricularia Total Fungi Hyphal Fragment Insect Fragment Pollen 1* 7' 42 870 276 5740 171 3560 - - 3 60 222 4620 11 230 - - - - - - 4 80 2 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 100 1' 7' 3 60 741 15374 - - - - 2 40 0 5.7 37.3 23.2 - 0.4 30.1 1.5 - - - 0.5 0.3 - - - - - - 0.7 0 0.4 100 - - 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None Detected - - - - - - - - - - 3 1 3 - - - 1* - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 1* - 1* 60 20 60 - - - 7' - - - - - - 147 7* - 7* 40.8 13.6 40.8 - - - 4.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 4.8 - 4.8 Analyt. Sensitivity 600x Analyt. Sensitivity 300x Skin Fragments (1-4) Fibrous Particulate (1-4) Background (1-5) - 21 - 7* - 1 - 1 - 2 - - - - - - 21 - - 7* - - 2 - - 1 - - 2 - - - - 21 7* 2 1 2 - - ..- _ - Bipolaris++ =Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes -t+ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discemable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background particulates, prohibiting accurate detection and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit Is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or Insect fragment. "-' Denotes particles found at 300X'=" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. E.MSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysts. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no -ponsibllity for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. samples analyzed by EMSLAnalytical, Inc. Orlando, FL AIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 • Initial report from: 07/28/2014 15:53:31 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 03:53:31 PM Pegg 3 31+ Test Report: Air-O-Cell(TM') Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: 341406389-0004 A04-20487049 150 Weight Room 341406389-0005 A05-20487195 150 Lounge/Ready Rm 341406389-0006 A06-20486938 150 Kitchen Snore Types Raw Count Cnunt/ma °/ of Tntal Raw Count Cnuntlma a/ of Total Raw Count entintlme 0/, of Tntal Alternaria Ascospores Aspergillus/Penicillium Basidiospores Bipolaris++ Chaetomium Cladosporium Curvularia Epicoccum Fusarium Ganoderma Myxomycetes++ Pithomyces Rust Scopulariopsis Stachybotrys Torula Ulocladium Unidentifiable Spores Cercospora Nigrospora Pyricularia TotalFungi Hyphal Fragment Insect Fragment Pollen - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 - - - - - - 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 - - - - 1' - - - - 2 4 - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 8 1* - - - 7` - - - - 40 80 - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - 147 7* - - - 4.8 - - - - 27.2 54.4 - - - - 13.6 - - - - - - - - - 100 4.8 - - - - 8 - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 - - - - - 200 - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 220 - - - - - 90.9 - - - - 9.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 - - - Analyt. Sensitivity 600x Analyt. Sensitivity 300x Skin Fragments (1-4) Fibrous Particulate (1-4) Background (1-5) - - - - - 21 7* 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - 21 7* 2 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - 21 7* 2 1 2 - - - - - EMSLAnalytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolabftemsl.com Order ID: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: 341406389 AMECH25 C012301233 1 Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River Fire Station #1 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/23/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/28/2014 Bipolaris++ =Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes++ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discernable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background particulates, prohibiting accurate detection and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or Insect fragment. "" Denotes particles found at 300X.'-" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by EMSLAnalytical, Inc. Orlando, FLAIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 Initial report from: 07/28/2014 15:53:31 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 03:53:31 PM Page 2 of EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolabna emsl.com Order ID: . 341406389 Customer ID: AMECH25 Customer PO: C012301233 Project ID: Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River Fire Station #1 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/23/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/28/2014 • A•r O-Cell(TM) Anal sis of Fungal Spores &Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) rcaar.CHana. t- Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: Y 341406389-0007 A07-20486947 150 Dorm/Bunk Area 341406389-0008 A08-20487009 150 Exterior Addition Dorm - Exit/Entry Door Spore Types Raw Cnunt Cniintlm' °/ nf Tntal Raw Cnunt Cnuntlm' °/ nf Total Alternaria Ascospores Aspergillus/Penicillium Basidiospores Bipolaris++ Chaetomium Cladosporium Curvularia Epicoccum Fusarium Ganoderma Myxomycetes++ Pithomyces Rust Scopulariopsis Stachybotrys Torula Ulocladium Unidentifiable Spores Cercospora Nigrospora Pyricularia Total Fungi Hyphal Fragment Insect Fragment Pollen 1' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - 7* - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - - 7 - - - 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 - - - - - - 8 200 23.5 3 60 7 14 290 34.1 - - - - - - 2 40 4.7 1* 7* 0.8 1* 7* 0.8 - - - 3 60 7 2 40 4.7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 60 7 1* 7* 0.8 4 80 9.4 42 851 100 - - - - - - - - - Analyt. Sensitivity 600x Analyt. Sensitivity 300x Skin Fragments (1-4) Fibrous Particulate (1-4) Background (1-5) - - - - - 21 7* 1 1 2 - - - - - - 21 - 7* - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - Bipolaris++ =Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes++ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discernable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background particulates, prohibiting accurate detection and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit Is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or Insect fragment. "" Denotes particles found at 300X. .." Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no , ,onsibility for sample collection actWHles or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. .npies analyzed by EMSLAnalytical, Inc. Orlando, FLAIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 Initial report from: 07/28/2014 15:53:31 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 03:53:31 PM Page of 18 September 2014 Ms. Beth Martin — Risk Manager Risk Management Division Indian River County 1800 271" Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-0310 Phone: +1 (772) 567-8000 Ext 1287 Email: bmartin(ct�,ircgov.com. Subject: Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment Indian River County Fire Station #7 1215 82"d Avenue Vero Beach, Florida AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Dear Ms. Martin: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) has completed the Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Assessment requested by Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM) at Fire Station #1. The field survey including spore trap air sampling was performed by Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens, Industrial Hygienist Technician on 22 July 2014. Our field services for this limited inspections and IAQ Assessment were conducted in general accordance with AMEC Proposal 14PROP0010.6380.0349, Revision 1, dated 10 July 2014 and as authorized by Purchase Order #69508-00. AMEC appreciates the opportunity to have been of assistance to you on this project and is looking forward to working with you as your consultant in the future. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Ronald C. Trapane, MS, IEC Lisa M. Prieto, P.E. Program Manager Attachments: Building Plan Photographs Laboratory Report Russell E. Stauffer, P. ., CIEC Orlando Office Manager Mold Assessor #MRSA -2010 P:16380 IEQIPROJECTS12014-Projects11233IRC Four Fire Stations\Station #711233 Report Station#7,docx Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 75 East Amelia Street, Suite 200 Orlando, Florida 32801 USA Tel +1(407) 522-7570 Fax +1(407) 522-7576 13 r1 2 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 17 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION Information concerning this project was obtained from a request for proposal dated 6 June 2014 from Ms. Beth Martin with Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM). Additional information was obtained at a meeting held on July 22, 2014 at IRCRM office. The meeting was attended by Ms. Beth Martin (Risk Manager), Mr. John King (Fire Chief), Mr. Brian Burkeen (Assistant Chief), Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens with AMEC. Mr. Burkeen accompanied us during our inspection and provided additional information during the inspection. The fire station was reportedly built in 1984 and consists of approximately 3,100 gross square feet, with 1,320 square feet of living area. A plan depicting the building layout is attached. According to Mr. Burkeen there has been an ongoing problem with bats roosting in the attic and the screening over the attic vents have been replaced numerous times. There have been no roof leaks reported in many years. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work for this project included the following tasks: Task 1 - Site Visit, Observations, and Comfort Parameter Screening Our services for this task included a site visit to conduct visual observations and obtaining selected indoor air quality measurements within the fire station. The comfort parameter and other measurements, consisting of carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and airborne particulates, were compared with ASHRAE, OSHA, and NIOSH, standards to establish the conditions in the subject area at the time of the evaluation. Measurements were collected in numerous locations within the subject area, as well as outside the fire station, for baseline comparison purposes. Task 2 — Heating, Ventilation, and Air -Conditioning (HVAC) System Observation AMEC conducted a visual observation of the HVAC systems serving the building. Our services included a walk-through of the interior spaces and mechanical areas with the person responsible for the maintenance of the system to observe the operation, general maintenance and housekeeping characteristics of the associated HVAC systems. The interiors of representative air handler units were observed. Task 3 — Microbial Sampling In order to assess the potential presence or absence of mold amplification, AMEC collected a total of three spore trap air samples from inside representative areas of the building, and two outside samples for comparative purposes. The samples were sent to an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory and analyzed for viable and non-viable fungi. Laboratory analysis of the spore trap air samples included basic (outside) and expanded (inside) fungal analysis using direct optical microscopy. The expanded (interior) analysis included insect parts, skin cell fragments, and inorganic particles, useful to indicate if current housing keeping measures are sufficient/effective at the fire station. The spore trap samples were collected on spore trap (air -o -cell) utilizing a calibrated high volume - sampling pump. The sample results are included in our report and were compared against industry 13� 3 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #7 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 guidelines and recommendations. Sampling to address infectious disease control was beyond our scope of services. Task 4 — Moisture Intrusion Assessment (Protimete) Our services for this task included a site visit to observe building finishes in order to evaluate if areas were impacted by moisture intrusion and to confirm the presence or absence of suspect visible mold growth. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. We performed non-destructive testing for elevated moisture content of representative finishing materials using a Protimeter moisture meter. Task 5 — Structural Integrity Assessment Our services for this task included a site visit to observe the visible existing structural framing and assess areas of distress or indications of loss of structural integrity. This task was conducted by a Florida Professional Engineer (PE) specializing in Structural Engineering. If available we reviewed original construction plans prior to our assessment. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. Task 6 - Report Preparation At the completion of our site visits, a report was prepared to summarize the information obtained. This report discussed our visual observations, Protimeter evaluations, and the results of our comfort parameter screening measurements and airborne microbial sampling results. 3.0 FINDINGS 3.1 Visual Observations Exterior • There are numerous cracks in the stucco at the planter walls. • .The building fascia and soffit is deteriorated at many locations. • Down spouts do not all divert the rain water away from the building. • There a few old conduits or small holes in the walls. • The paint has visibly degraded at some locations. • The icemaker condensate drain does not have a p -trap and the moisture is not diverted away from the building. Interior • Dust, dirt and insect debris, etc. were observed and dirty diffuser louvers and returns were noted in the building, indicating poor housekeeping, even though the observations were limited. • Doors from the apparatus bay into the living areas do not have weatherstripping. • There are stained ceiling tiles near the NC closet from moisture dripping from the coolant line in the attic above. • There is evidence of previous moisture intrusion in the bathroom. • The vent fan in the bathroom exhausts into the attic. 13c1 4 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #7 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 • Numerous diffusers have suspect visible mold (SVM). • Some diffusers have been repainted. • Some of the ceiling tiles have been painted. • The vent hood over the stove is dirty and has SVM. • A portable fan in the dormitory has SVM. • There is a lack of sealant between the wall and window frames at many locations however there is no evidence of moisture intrusion. • Many of the light fixtures are rusted on the top side which is exposed to the attic space. • A portion of the exterior wall sheathing in the attic has evidence of previous moisture intrusion. • The fiberglass batt insulation above the ceiling tiles has been moved out of position in numerous locations. There is no indication that an "air barrier exists between the conditioned occupied spaces and the vented attic. If an effective air barrier is not present, un -conditioned, hot humid air (particularly during the summer months) from the vented attic is allowed to come into contact with the metal ducts and supply/return components and ceiling tiles which are cooled by the HVAC for the occupied spaces below. This condition can be exacerbated by low thermostat set points (typically well below 72 degrees Fahrenheit) in the occupied areas. Painted drywall/joint compound walls and suspended acoustical tile ceiling with fiberglass batt insulation above are typically not air barriers as defined by Florida Building Code (FBC). The lack of an effective air barrier can result in condensation control issues, moisture vapor control issues, and higher heating and cooling costs. HVAC • One Trane and a Haier portable floor unit supplies A/C to property. • The Trane unit located in Ready Room had visible signs of SVM on ceiling of A/C closet around duct penetration, some rust and lite moisture on coils and dust on filter grille of filter housing was also visible, unit also has a new Eco-aire, pleated filter marked with change date. • The A/C return located in Dorm, had a clean pleated filter and showed signs of Dust and Suspect Visible Mold (SVM). • The Haier floor model unit has dust in filter area. • Condensate line in the Ready Room above ceiling tile, was wrapped in neoprene and flex seal 457 tape which was completely saturated. 3.2 Moisture Screening Moisture testing was conducted by using a Protimeter non-destructive moisture meter to evaluate the presence and extent of elevated moisture within representative interior door and window areas. AMEC also obtained moisture readings from representative window sills and walls around walls and doors that showed evidence of cracking or deterioration. The Protimeter "Probe Mode" readings, ranging from 0 to 14 wood moisture equivalent (WME) are considered to have "Air Dry Conditions" and are consistent with typical wallboard in office environments which has not been impacted by elevated moisture. Readings ranging from 15 to 19 are 5 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #7 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 considered to be "At Risk" for moisture problems. Readings 20 and above indicate moisture content typical of finishes which have been impacted by moisture intrusion. The results of our comfort parameter readings are summarized in the following Table No. 1. eadings repared By: CG Checked 6y. Rte, The moisture meter survey confirmed that there were NO drywall "moisture intrusion" issues. 3.3 Comfort Parameter Screening Testing for the basic comfort parameters (carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and particulates) associated with indoor air quality was also conducted within interior finished areas. For comparison purposes, testing was also conducted at locations outside of the fire station. Temperature and relative humidity were monitored during AMEC's site visit with a TSI Q -Trak 8550 hand—held hygrometer/thermometer. Temperature Levels Temperature and relative humidity levels can be considered as indicators of the HVAC system's ability to handle building thermal Toads. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has not established temperature and relative humidity limits. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 55-2004, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, recommends that summertime (mechanical cooling) temperatures are maintained between 73 and 79 degrees Fahrenheit, and that wintertime (mechanical heating) temperatures are maintained between 68 and 74 degrees Fahrenheit. At the time site visit was conduction on the outside temperature was measured at 81 degrees Fahrenheit so ASHRAE summertime guidelines are referenced. During the site visit, the temperature thermostats at the fire station were set at 73 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the Ready room, with confirmatory readings from the TSI Q -Trak at 71.7 degrees F, and the Dorm room floor model was set at 70 degrees F and confirmed at 70.7 degrees F. 14( • Protimeter Readings (WME) Conditions. Location / Suspect Visible Mold (SVM) 12.2 Air Dry Interior — Dispatch office, around door and window Interior — Ready room, around both windows and door to bay 11.4 Air Dry Interior- Kitchen, around window 13.1 Air Dry Interior — Dorm around windows and doors 11.3 Air Dry Interior — Bathroom, off Dorm (interior walls) 10.2 Air Dry Interior — Bathroom (with urinal) interior walls 10.4 Air Dry repared By: CG Checked 6y. Rte, The moisture meter survey confirmed that there were NO drywall "moisture intrusion" issues. 3.3 Comfort Parameter Screening Testing for the basic comfort parameters (carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and particulates) associated with indoor air quality was also conducted within interior finished areas. For comparison purposes, testing was also conducted at locations outside of the fire station. Temperature and relative humidity were monitored during AMEC's site visit with a TSI Q -Trak 8550 hand—held hygrometer/thermometer. Temperature Levels Temperature and relative humidity levels can be considered as indicators of the HVAC system's ability to handle building thermal Toads. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has not established temperature and relative humidity limits. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 55-2004, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, recommends that summertime (mechanical cooling) temperatures are maintained between 73 and 79 degrees Fahrenheit, and that wintertime (mechanical heating) temperatures are maintained between 68 and 74 degrees Fahrenheit. At the time site visit was conduction on the outside temperature was measured at 81 degrees Fahrenheit so ASHRAE summertime guidelines are referenced. During the site visit, the temperature thermostats at the fire station were set at 73 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the Ready room, with confirmatory readings from the TSI Q -Trak at 71.7 degrees F, and the Dorm room floor model was set at 70 degrees F and confirmed at 70.7 degrees F. 14( 6 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #7 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Relative Humidity Levels The ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, notes that ... Relative humidity in habitab/e spaces preferably should be maintained between 30% and 60% relative humidity to minimize growth of allergenic or pathogenic organisms. The Standard also notes that ... if the relative humidity in occupied spaces and low velocity ducts and plenums exceeds 70%, fungal contamination (for example, mold, mildew, etc) can occur. Relative humidity should be maintained between 30 to 60 percent during all seasons, since humidity above 60 percent may contribute to the growth of mold and bacteria on porous indoor surfaces. Carbon Dioxide Levels CO2 readings were obtained from both inside and outside as part of the evaluation process. Current guidelines provided in the ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, is calculated by adding 700 parts per million (ppm) to the carbon dioxide concentration level measured outside the building and was used as the basis for our evaluation. This calculation corresponds to an outdoor air intake of 15-20 cubic feet per minute (CFM), per person. Therefore, the exterior 519 ppm CO2 value established a target value of 1,219 for CO2(5519 + 700 = 1,219 ppm). The results of our comfort parameter readings are summarized in the following Table No. 2. Table 2: Comfort Parameter Measurements Location Date Time . CO2 (ppm).. •Temp :` ' (F:) Relative Humidity (%) , Target Values Date Time 1,219 (519 + 700) 73-79 (summertime) 30-60 Outside —Back entry at bay doors 7/22/14 11:OOA 519 81.6 86.7 Inside/outside — Bay area 7/22/14 11:08A 462 84.6 78.8 Inside - Ready room 7/22/14 11:15A 643 74.8 41.4 Inside — Dispatch room 7/22/14 11:30A 662 74.9 43.6 Inside - Bathroom 7/22/14 11:56A 635 74.4 41.4 Inside — Kitchen 7/22/14 12:24P 629 72.4 42.6 Front Entry 7/22/14 1:00P 640 71.8 42.1 Prepared By: CG. Checked By: RLJ Results in bold indicate that test location measurements were not within ASHRAE recommended levels. Of the four interior temperature readings obtained (ranging from 71.8 to 74.8 degrees F), two readings were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels — possibly due to thermostat settings and/or HVAC system inefficiencies. iLta 7 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station 17 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 All of the 4 interior Relative Humidity (%) readings (ranging from 41.4% to 42.6% RH) were within ASHRAE recommended levels. All of the 4 interior carbon dioxide readings obtained were within ASHRAE recommended levels. 3.4 Mold Air Testing Five air samples were obtained using spore trap (air -o -cell) with the fire station, while two samples were obtained from outside to the rear and front of the truck bay and main entry at the beginning and end of AMEC's site visit on 22 July 2014. The samples were returned, using chain of custody procedures to EMLab P&K Inc., an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory. The samples were analyzed for viable and non-viable fungal spores, skin cells, and mycelia fragments. Copies of the laboratory reports are attached to this report for your reference. Table 3 summarizes the results of the biological particle analysis: - Spore Trap Results —Biological Particles (1) Sample numbers are listed in parentheses The guidance of the AIHA journal, Indoor Health, Background Levels of Fungi, July/August 2003 consensus opinion is that the indoor microbial levels should be below the outdoor levels with no difference in the interior type. The interior sample results did not indicate elevated microbial levels in two of the three interior locations when compared to the average of the two outside samples. However, while the total spore count (270 per m3) was below the total, average outside spore count (2,637 per m3) there were elevated individual spore count levels that were either above or not present in average of the corresponding outside samples. The laboratory analytical results are attached. 43 Sample) Location TOTAL Spore Counts (m3) Predominant Type Spore Count (m3) (01-) Exterior — Rear section of Bay doors Total Exterior Spore Counts - 3477 (02-) Interior — Ready Room Total Spore Counts - 270 Two individual spore types greatly exceeded the respective outside levels (03-) Interior — Dorm area Total Spore Counts - 0 No spores detected (04-) Interior — Dispatch office Total Spore Counts -20 No individual spore types exceeded either of the two respective outside samples. (05-) Exterior — Front/Main entry Total Exterior Spore Counts -1797 (1) Sample numbers are listed in parentheses The guidance of the AIHA journal, Indoor Health, Background Levels of Fungi, July/August 2003 consensus opinion is that the indoor microbial levels should be below the outdoor levels with no difference in the interior type. The interior sample results did not indicate elevated microbial levels in two of the three interior locations when compared to the average of the two outside samples. However, while the total spore count (270 per m3) was below the total, average outside spore count (2,637 per m3) there were elevated individual spore count levels that were either above or not present in average of the corresponding outside samples. The laboratory analytical results are attached. 43 8 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #7 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 As part of this scope we included expanded analysis of the interior spore trap air samples to include epithelial (skin) cells, and hyphal fragments. Table 4 summarizes the results of the expanded particle analysis: Table 4 — Spore Trap Results — Sample) Location Hyphal Fragments (particles/m3) Epithelial (Skin) Cells (Loading Factor: {lightest} 1 thru 4 {heaviest}) (01-) Exterior —Rear section of Bay doors Hyphal Fragments — 60 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 1 (02-) Interior — Ready Room Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 (03-) Interior — Dorm area Hyphal Fragments — 20 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 1 (04-) Interior — Dispatch office Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 1 (05-) Exterior — Front/Main entry • Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells —1• rs are listed in parentheses There is no consensus opinion as to the indoor particle levels for skin cells or hyphal fragments. However, "higher" hyphal fragment and skin cell loading levels, relative to the other interior results, was noted in the Ready Room - indications of possible ineffective housekeeping. The laboratory analytical results are attached. 3.4 Structural Integrity Assessment • Based upon our visual observations there was no indication of structural distress or damage. 144 9 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #7 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our visual observations and test results we offer the following conclusions: • Dust, dirt, cobweb, insect debris, etc. were observed on horizontal surfaces (tables, window sills, window blinds, shelves, counter tops, fluorescent light covers, etc.) and greasy and dusty diffuser louvers & returns were noted in the building, indicating poor housekeeping, and underscored by the additional airborne particulate results. • There are numerous exterior issues, including cracks in the stucco, fascia and soffit deterioration, down spouts drainage, conduits or small holes in the walls and visibly degraded paint. While not currently associated or linked with specific water intrusion issues, their presence can be regarded as a possible early warning. • Of the four interior temperature readings obtained (ranging from 71.8 to 74.8 degrees F), two readings were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels — possibly due to thermostat settings and/or HVAC system inefficiencies. • All of the 4 interior Relative Humidity (%) readings (ranging from 41.4% to 42.6% RH) were within ASHRAE recommended levels. • All of the 4 interior carbon dioxide readings obtained were within ASHRAE recommended levels. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS As requested, AMEC has prepared the following recommendations for corrective actions based on the issues identified during our evaluation: 1. The water -stained, SVM ceiling tiles, and wet fiberglass duct and HVAC insulation should be replaced. Rusted louvers and metal components/grids should be replaced/repainted. Confirmation that all supply ducts are properly insulated, to reduce potential condensation issues, should also occur. 2. AMEC recommends inspection and cleaning of mold -impacted and dirty HVAC Units, ducts and components using a hypochlorite (10% bleach and water) solution, BBJ MicroBiocide, Oxine, EnviroCon, Fiberlock Shockwave, or Fosters 40-80. Remove and replace all mold or water -damaged HVAC or duct insulation. Note, all mold remediation activities are to be accomplished by experienced, properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, et al. 3. Deteriorated exterior components and/or issues (fascia, paint, cracking deterioration, etc.) should be demarcated, the root cause identified and remediated to prevent contribution to any future water intrusion episodes. 4. Since improperly conducted mold remediation activities can create additional issues, it is recommended that all mold remediation activities be accomplished by experienced, properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, etal. Additionally, third -party mold remediation monitoring and air testing should be conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the mold remediation contractor's activities. 5. Improve housekeeping to reduce visible dirt, dust, insect parts, etc. Improved housekeeping is likely to reduce elevated skin counts identified. 18 September2014 Indian River County fire Station /7 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 6. AMEC also recommends testing, adjusting, and balancing of the HVAC system components to determine if the HVAC system provides airflows that are in accordance with the design specifications. Additionally, confirm that temperature settings for the HVAC system are accurate and raise temperature levels in the location identified as below ASHRAE recommended guidelines. 7. Confirm that a proper air barrier has been installed between the conditioned finished space and the "naturally ventilated" plenum space above the dropped ceiling tiles and batting, in order to prevent the potential for plenum moisture, in accordance with applicable Florida Building Code (Mechanical). Acceptable air barriers are generally made of durable, nonporous materials and are sealed to adjoining wall, ceiling or floor surfaces with suitable long -life mastics. 8. Follow up testing and inspections should be performed after the recommendations described above are completed. 6.0 LIMITATIONS AMEC has endeavored to observe the existing conditions within the finished areas of the Indian River County Fire Station #7 using generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of our assessment, there is always a possibility some areas were overlooked or inaccessible, or are different from those specific assessment locations. If conditions related to indoor air quality, other than those identified in this report, is identified in the subject spaces, AMEC should be contacted to evaluate the findings and conclusions in this report in light of the new information. This report is intended for the exclusive use of Indian River County Govemment. The findings are relative to the date of our site visit and should not be relied upon for substantially previous and/or later dates. BUILDING PLAN lr] C:\USERS\JAM ES. PICK ERING\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\ACP UBLISH_6088\6380-14-1233 INDIAN RIVER FD. DWG JAMES.PICKERING 9/04/14 - 11:29:39 AM QA01 WORKSHOP/STORAGE APPARATUS ROOM AA03 DORMITORY CJ STATION #7 QFLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' LEGEND SPORE TRAP LOCATIONS L7 KI TCHEN READY ROOM AA02 1215 82nd AVE VERO BEACH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA amec° AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #. CA -5397 INSPECTED RLJ/CG PROJECT 6380141233 DRAWN JSP PHASE CHECKED DATE 2014-09-04 SHEET TITLE FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER 1 N� PHOTOS JLLq IRC Fire Station #7 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 1 Front Elevation Photo 3 Typical cracks in planter walls Photo 5 Deteriorated facia and soffit Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 2 Damaged lattice above entry door Photo 4 Deteriorated facia above entry door Photo 6 Downspout with minor washout and not effectively diverting water away 1 I�� IRC Fire Station #7 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 7 Open conduit into attic Photo 9 Condensate drain from icemaker— no p -trap and moisture is not directed away from building Photo 11 Plywood ceiling in apparatus bay — no evidence of moisture intrusion Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 8 Paint degradation Photo 10 Refrigerator in apparatus bay with SVM Photo 12 Door from apparatus bay into office area — no weather-stripping 2 X51 IRC Fire Station #7 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 if.,pc ' ilr 4,4te?..s+,4 • 41- .0 _,3,...1, 1..,11. ..., • .;:i6 .-... .4t.rigrs4 re,' Photo 13 Stained ceiling tile in front of NC closet — moisture dripping from coolant line in attic Photo 15 Vent fan in men's bathroom, exhausts into attic — SVM, rust on ceiling grid Photo 17 Underside of stove vent hood — needs cleaning and SVM Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 14 Moisture damage at vinyl floor tiles Photo 16 In front of entry to kitchen — example of painted ceiling tiles previously stained Photo 18 Diffuser in kitchen - SVM 3 ID IRC Fire Station #7 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 19 Stained ceiling tile and SVM on diffuser in ready room Photo 21 Bathroom - moisture damage to floor tile Photo 23 Bathroom, stains on ceiling (SVM) and diffuser has been painted Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 20 Portable fan in dormitory - SVM Photo 22 Bathroom - moisture damage to floor tile Photo 24 Window in dormitory with no sealant inside frame, no evidence of moisture intrusion 4 153 IRC Fire Station #7 AMEC Project Number 6380141233 Photo 25 Above ready room — rust on Tight fixture Photo 27 Attic exhaust fan — appears to be non- operational Photo 29 A/C closet in Ready room Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 26 Above ready room — insulation moved out of place Photo 28 Moisture stain on exterior wall sheathing in attic at vent Photo 30 Vent of A/C in Ready room 5 i 5 4 IRC Fire Station #7 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 31 Suspect Visible Mold (SVM) on ceiling of NC closet Photo 33 SVM at coils of AHU in Ready room Photo 35 Stains on Fiberglass insulation of AHU • Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 32 Floor model A/C in Dorm area Photo 34 S.V.M at coils of AHU in Ready room Photo 36 Wet insulation on condensate line, above ceiling tiles in Ready room 6 155 IRC Fire Station #7 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 37 Dust on flexible fiberglass ducts above ceiling tiles Photo 39 Visible signs of SVM on NC return in Bunk area Photo 41 Q -track and thermostat comparison (Ready room). Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 38 Dust on flexible fiberglass ducts above ceiling tiles Photo 40 Dust at A/C return in Bunk area 70.7 S0 SO Photo 42 Q -track and thermostat comparison (Bunk area). 7 15 (0 LABORATORY REPORTS EMSLAnalytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab(aemsl.com Order ID: 341406392 Customer ID: AMECH25 Customer PO: C012301233 Project ID: Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River Fire Station #7 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/22/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/28/2014 Test Report: Air-O-CeIl(TM) Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: 341406392-0001 A01-20487189 150 Exterior Rear of Bldg - Bay Doors 341406392-0002 A02-20486916 150 Lounge/Ready Room 341406392-0003 A03-20489636 150 Dorm/Bunk Area Soore Tvpes Raw Calm( Countlm' o cif Tntal Raw Cniint Count/n.0 o nf Tntal Raw Cnunt Cnuntlm3 °A nf Tntal Alternaria - - - - - - - - - - Ascospores 28 590 17 - - - - - - Aspergillus/Penicillium 6 100 2.9 11 230 85.2 - - - Basidiospores 37 780 22.4 1 20 7.4 - - - Bipolaris++ - - - - - - - - - Chaetomium - - - - - - - - - Cladosporium 7 100 2.9 - - - - - - Curvularia 8 200 5.8 - - - - - - Epicoccum 1 20 0.6 - - - - - - Fusarium 1 20 0.6 - - - - - - Ganoderma 2 40 1.1 - - - - - - Myxomycetes++ 2 40 1.1 - - - - - - Pithomyces 1 20 0.6 - - - - - - Rust - - - - - - - - - Scopulariopsis - - - - - - - - - Stachybotrys - - - - - - - - - Cercospora 1 20 0.6 - - - - - - Nigrospora 1' 7' 0.2 - - - - - - Pestalotiopsis - - - 1 20 7.4 - - - Pyricularia 72 1500 43.1 - - - - - - Spegazzinia 1 20 0.6 - - - - - - Sporomiella 1 20 0.6 - - - - - - Total Fungi 169 3477 100 13 270 100 - - - Hyphal Fragment 3 60 1.7 - - - 1 20 - Insect Fragment - - - - - - - - - Pollen 10 210 6 - - - - - - Analyt. Sensitivity 600x - 21 - - 21 - - 21 - Analyt. Sensitivity 300x - 7' - - 7* - - 7* - Skin Fragments (1-4) - 1 - - 2 - - 1 - Fibrous Particulate (1-4) - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - Background (1-5) - 2 - - 1 - - 1 - Bipolaris++= B ipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes++ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discernable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background particulates, prohibiting accurate detection and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit Is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or insect fragment. "*" Denotes particles found at 300X. "-" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based an the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by EMSLAnalytIcal, Inc. Orlando, FLAIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 Initial report from: 07/28/2014 18:39:53 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 06:39:53PM Page 1 of 2 f5 a EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab(c�emsl.com Order ID: 341406392 Customer ID: AMECH25 Customer PO: C012301233 Project ID: Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River Fire Station #7 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) 11 -only Collected: 07/22/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/28/2014 Test Report: Air-O-Cell(TM') Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: 341406392-0004 A04-20486963 150 Dispatch Office 341406392-0005 A08-20487071 150 Front/Main Entry (Exterior) Spore Types Raw Cntlnt Cnuntlm' °! nf Tntal Raw Cnunt Cnuntlm3 °G nf Total Alternaria - - - 3' 20* 1.1 Ascospores - - - 13 270 15 Aspergillus/Penicillium - - - 2 40 2.2 Basidiospores 1 20 100 26 550 30.6 Bipolaris++ - - - 1 20 1.1 Chaetomium - - - - - - Cladosporium - - - 12 250 13.9 Curvularia - - - 1 20 1.1 Epicoccum - - - - - - Fusarium - - - 1 20 1.1 Ganoderma - - - 7 100 5.6 Myxomycetes++ - - 20 420 23.4 Pithomyces - - - 2 40 2.2 Rust - - - - - - Scopulariopsis - - - - - - Stachybotrys - - - - - - Cercospora - - - 1 20 1.1 Nigrospora - - - 1 20 1.1 Pestalotiopsis - - - - Pyricularia - - - - - - Spegazzinia - - - 1* 7* 0.4 Sporomiella - - - - - - • Total Fungi 1 20 100 91 1797 100 Hyphal Fragment - - - - - - Insect Fragment - - - - - - Pollen- - - 3 60 3.3 Analyt. Sensitivity 600x - 21 - - 21 - Analyt. Sensitivity 300x - 7` - - 7* - Skin Fragments (1-4) - 1 - - 1 - Fibrous Particulate (1-4) - 1 - - 1 - Background (1-5) - 1 - - 1 - Sample Comments: 341406392-0005 Sample contains RARE amount of algae -like organisms. Bipolaris++ =Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes++ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discemable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background parUculates, prohibiting accurate detection and quantiricauon. Present= Spores defected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit Is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or insect fragment "-" Denotes particles found at 300X. "-" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. hples analyzed by EMSLAnalyticai, Inc. Orlando, FL All -IA -LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 ( Initial report from: 07/28/2014 18:39:53 • 5 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 06:39:53PM Page 2 of125 n 18 September 2014 Ms. Beth Martin — Risk Manager Risk Management Division Indian River County 1800 27`h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-0310 Phone: +1 (772) 567-8000 Ext 1287 Email: bmartin(c�ircgov.com Subject: Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment Indian River County Fire Station #10 62 N. Broadway Fellsmere, Florida AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Dear Ms. Martin: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) has completed the Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Assessment requested by Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM) at Fire Station #1. The field survey including spore trap air sampling was performed by Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens, Industrial HygieneTechnician on 22 July 2014. Our field services for this limited inspections and IAQ Assessment were conducted in general accordance with AMEC Proposal 14PROP0010.6380.0349, Revision 1,dated 10 July 2014 and as authorized by Purchase Order #69508- 00. AMEC appreciates the opportunity to have been of assistance to you on this project and is looking forward to working with you as your consultant in the future. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully, A i C Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. C Ronald C. Trapane, S, CIEC Senior Project Manager Attachments: Building Plan Photographs Laboratory Report Lisa M. Prieto, P.E. Orlando Office Manager Russell E. Stauffer, P. \, CIEC Mold Assessor #MRSA -2010 P:163801EQIPROJECTS12014-Projects11233IRC Four Fire StationslStation #1011233 Report Station#10.docx Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc, 75 East Amelia Street, Suite 200 Orlando, Florida 32801 USA Tel +1 (407) 522-7570 Fax +1 (407) 522-7576 1/00 2 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 110 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION Information concerning this project was obtained from a request for proposal dated 6 June 2014 from Ms. Beth Martin with Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM). Additional information was obtained at a meeting held on July 22, 2014 at IRCRM office. The meeting was attended by Ms. Beth Martin (Risk Manager), Mr. John King (Fire Chief), Mr. Brian Burkeen (Assistant Chief), Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens with AMEC. Mr. Burkeen accompanied us during our inspection and provided additional information during the inspection. The fire station was reportedly built in 1980 with an addition built in 1995 and consists of approximately 6,993 gross square feet. A plan depicting the building layout is attached. Bids were being solicited to replace the low slope roof area. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work for this project included the following tasks: Task 1 - Site Visit, Observations, and Comfort Parameter Screening Our services for this task included a site visit to conduct visual observations and obtaining selected indoor air quality measurements within the fire station. The comfort parameter and other measurements, consisting of carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and airborne particulates, were compared with ASHRAE, OSHA, and NIOSH, standards to establish the conditions in the subject area at the time of the evaluation. Measurements were collected in numerous locations within the subject area, as well as outside the fire station, for baseline comparison purposes. Task 2 — Heating, Ventilation, and Air -Conditioning (HVAC) System Observation AMEC conducted a visual observation of the HVAC systems serving the building. Our services included a walk-through of the interior spaces and mechanical areas with the person responsible for the maintenance of the system to observe the operation, general maintenance and housekeeping characteristics of the associated HVAC systems. The interiors of representative air handler units were observed. Task 3 — Microbial Sampling In order to assess the potential presence or absence of mold amplification, AMEC collected a total of five spore trap air samples from inside representative areas of the building, and two outside samples for comparative purposes. The samples were sent to an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory and analyzed for viable and non-viable fungi. Laboratory analysis of the spore trap air samples included basic (outside) and (inside) fungal analysis using direct optical microscopy. The expanded (interior) analysis included insect parts, skin cell fragments, and inorganic particles, useful to indicate if current housing keeping measures are sufficient/effective at the fire station. The spore trap samples were collected on spore trap (air -o -cell) utilizing a calibrated high volume - sampling pump. The sample results are included in our report and were compared against industry guidelines and recommendations. Sampling to address infectious disease control was beyond our scope of services. ISI 3 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station 110 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Task 4 — Moisture Intrusion Assessment (Protimeter) Our services for this task included a site visit to observe building finishes in order to evaluate if areas were impacted by moisture intrusion and to confirm the presence or absence of suspect visible mold growth. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. We performed non-destructive testing for elevated moisture content of representative finishing materials using a Protimeter moisture meter. Task 5 — Structural Integrity Assessment Our services for this task included a site visit to observe the visible existing structural framing and assess areas of distress or indications of loss of structural integrity. This task was conducted by a Florida Professional Engineer (PE) specializing in Structural Engineering. If available we reviewed original construction plans prior to our assessment. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. Task 6 - Report Preparation At the completion of our site visits, a report was prepared to summarize the information obtained. This report discussed our visual observations, Protimeter evaluations, and the results of our comfort parameter screening measurements and airborne microbial sampling results. 3.0 FINDINGS 3.1 Visual Observations Exterior • There is a missing Tight fixture near the front entry door which allows insects to enter the attic space. • There is evidence that the lawn sprinklers are spraying on the building. • Roof drains do not direct the water away from the building. • Condensate lines do not direct the moisture away from the building. • There is standing water along the south side of the building. • Grade along the south side of the building is above the level of the floor slab. Interior • There are stains on numerous ceiling tiles and numerous tiles appear to have been previously replaced. • Doors from the administration areas to the Apparatus Bay don't have weather stripping. • Door from the kitchen to the Apparatus Bay have worn weather stripping. • Numerous diffusers have suspect visible mold growth (SVM) and are dirty. • There are active roof Teaks. • The stove vent hood needs cleaning and the vent flapper needs to be replaced. • The drinking fountain and ice maker have SVM. • Dust, dirt, cobweb, insect debris, etc. were observed on horizontal surfaces indicating poor housekeeping, even though the observations were limited. Table No. 1: Surface Moisture Readings Location / Suspect Visible Mold (SVM) .Protimeter Readings (WME) Conditions Interior — Administrative section, interior walls, around doors and windows (non -probe mode) Hardie board used, not drywall. 64 to 118* Air Dry* Interior — Ready room/kitchen, around doors and windows 10.8 Air Dry Interior -Bath #1, ceiling 14.7 At Risk Interior — Dorm 11.5 Air Dry Interior — Bath #3, south wall 19.3 At Risk Interior — Bath #2, ceiling 10.6 Air Dry Interior — Weight room, east wall 10.1 Air Dry Interior — Weight room, south wall, below window sill 20.8 Moisture Intrusion Interior — Storage/Supply room 17.0 At Risk 4 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #10 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 HVAC • Needs cleaning • Filters are pleated, dirty and were changed on 7/3/14 3.2 Moisture Screening Moisture testing was conducted by using a Protimeter non-destructive moisture meter to evaluate the presence and extent of elevated moisture within representative interior door and window areas. AMEC also obtained moisture readings from representative window sills and walls around walls and doors that showed evidence of cracking or deterioration. The Protimeter "Probe Mode" readings, ranging from 0 to 14 wood moisture equivalent (WME) are considered to have "Air Dry Conditions" and are consistent with typical wallboard in office environments which has not been impacted by elevated moisture. Readings ranging from 15 to 19 are considered to be "At Risk" for moisture problems. Readings 20 and above indicate moisture content typical of finishes which have been impacted by moisture intrusion. The results of our comfort parameter readings are summarized in the following Table No.1. Prepared By: CG Checked By: RLJ (*) non -probe readings at the Hardie Board utilzed a scale of 0 to 140 representing "Air Dry" The moisture meter survey (bolded) confirmed that drywall in weight room (south wall) has "moisture intrusion" issues. (D3 5 18 September 2014 Indian River County fire Station #10 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 3.3 Comfort Parameter Screening Testing for the basic comfort parameters (carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and particulates) associated with indoor air quality was also conducted within interior finished areas. For comparison purposes, testing was also conducted at locations outside of the fire station. Temperature and relative humidity were monitored during AMEC's site visit with a TSI Q -Trak 8550 hand—held hygrometer/thermometer. Temperature Levels Temperature and relative humidity levels can be considered as indicators of the HVAC system's ability to handle building thermal loads. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has not established temperature and relative humidity limits. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 55-2004, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, recommends that summertime (mechanical cooling) temperatures are maintained between 73 and 79 degrees Fahrenheit, and that wintertime (mechanical heating) temperatures are maintained between 68 and 74 degrees Fahrenheit. At the time site visit was conduction on the outside temperature was measured at 76 degrees Fahrenheit so ASHRAE summertime guidelines are referenced. During the site visit, the temperature thermostat at the fire station was set at 69 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the Administrative area, with confirmatory readings from the TSI Q -Trak at 70.6 degrees F. Relative Humidity Levels The ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, notes that ... Relative humidity in habitable spaces preferably should be maintained between 30% and 60% relative humidity to minimize growth of allergenic or pathogenic organisms. The Standard also notes that ... if the relative humidity in occupied spaces and low velocity ducts and plenums exceeds 70%, fungal contamination (for example, mold, mildew, etc) can occur. Relative humidity should be maintained between 30 to 60 percent during all seasons, since humidity above 60 percent may contribute to the growth of mold and bacteria on porous indoor surfaces. Carbon Dioxide Levels CO2 readings were obtained from both inside and outside as part of the evaluation process. Current guidelines provided in the ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, is calculated by adding 700 parts per million (ppm) to the carbon dioxide concentration level measured outside the building and was used as the basis for our evaluation. This calculation corresponds to an outdoor air intake of 15-20 cubic feet per minute (CFM), per person. Therefore, the average of the two exterior CO2 values ( 406 ppm) established a target value of 1,106 for CO2(406 + 700 = 1,106 ppm). I 04 6 18 September2074 Indian River County Fire Station 110 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 The results of our comfort parameter readings are summarized in the following Table No. 2. Table 2: Comfort Paramete Location Date Time CO? O Tem p. Relative Humidity (% Target Values Date Time 1,106 (406+700) 73-79 (summertime) 30-60 Outside —Front entry 7/22/14 2:38p 374 85.9 74.2 Inside — Dispatch office 7/22/14 2:45p 1123 76.1 40.3 Inside-Kitchen/Ready room 7/22/14 2:57p 1139 73.6 44.0 Inside -Bay 7/22/14 3:12p 718 77.6 84.9 Inside -Dorm 7/22/14 3:30p 1093 67.3 47.8 Inside -Bath #1 7/22/14 3:42p 1091 69.2 58.7 Inside -Bath #2 7/22/14 3:54p 1111 68.5 57.5 Inside- Bath #3 7/22/14 4:09p 914 74.0 85.9 Inside —Boiler/Ice machine room 7/22/14 4:21p 737 73.3 87.4 Inside Supply room at bay area 7/22/14 4:33p 600 77.2 81.4 Inside —Gym/weight room 7/22/14 4:48p 601 77.7 64.5 Outside-Entry/Exit door off kitchen — 7/22/14 5:25p 438 75.6 91.0 Prepared By: CG. Checked By: RLJ Results in bold indicate that test location measurements were not within ASHRAE recommended levels. Of the ten interior temperature readings obtained 3 readings (ranging from 67.3 to 69.2 degrees F) were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels — possibly due to the thermostat and/or HVAC system inefficiencies. Of the ten interior Relative Humidity (%) readings obtained 5 readings (ranging from 64.5% to 87.4% RH) were above ASHRAE recommended levels. Of the ten interior carbon dioxide readings obtained 3 readings (ranging from 1111 to 1139) were above ASHRAE recommended levels. 1 5 7 3.4 Mold Air Testing 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station 110 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Three air samples were obtained using spore trap (air -o -cell) within the fire station, while two samples were obtained from outside at the beginning and end of AMEC's site visit on 22 July 2014. The samples were returned, using chain of custody procedures to EMLab P&K Inc., an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory. The samples were analyzed for non-viable fungal spores, and mycelia fragments. Copies of the laboratory reports are attached to this report for your reference. Table 3 summarizes the results of the biological particle analysis: Table 3 - Spore Trap Results — Biological Particles Sample(1) Location TOTAL Spore Counts (m3) s Predominant Type Spore Count (m3) (01 -)Exterior — Front Entry Total Exterior Spore Counts — 2,888 (02-) Interior — Dispatch Office Total Spore Counts - 274 Three individual spore types exceeded the two respective outside samples (03-) Interior — Ready Room/Kitchen Total Spore Counts - 207 No individual spore types exceeded either of the two respective outside samples. (04-) Interior — Bunk Total Spore Counts - 327 No individual spore types exceeded either of the two respective outside samples. (05-) Exterior — Exit off Kitchen Total Exterior Spore Counts — 7,500 (1) Sample numbers are listed in parentheses The guidance of the AIHA journal, Indoor Health, Background Levels of Fungi, July/August 2003 consensus opinion is that the indoor microbial levels should be below the outdoor levels with no difference in the interior type. The interior sample results did not indicate elevated microbial levels, when compared to the average of the two outside samples, with a only slight, de minimus elevation in the Dispatch Office sample location. The laboratory analytical results are attached. I (2 8 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station 110 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 As part of this scope we included expanded analysis of the interior spore trap air samples to include epithelial (skin) cells, and hyphal fragments. Table 4 summarizes the results of the expanded particle analysis: Table 4 — Spore Trap Results — Expanded Particles Sample) Location Hyphal Fragments (particles/m3) Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs (Loading Factor: {lightest} 1 thru 4 {heaviest}) (01 -)Exterior— Front Entry Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs — 1 (02-) Interior — Dispatch Office Hyphal Fragments — 20 Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs — 2 (03-) Interior — Ready Room/Kitchen Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs — 3 (04-) Interior — Bunk Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 (05-) Exterior — Exit off Kitchen Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs —1 (2) Sample numbers are listed in parentheses There is no consensus opinion as to the indoor particle levels for skin cells or hyphal fragments. However, "higher" hyphal fragment and especially skin cell loading levels, relative to other typical interior results, were noted in the three interior locations: Dispatch Office (hyphal fragments ans skin cells), Ready Room and Bunk (skin cells only) areas - indications of possible ineffective housekeeping.. The laboratory analytical results are attached. 3.4 Structural Integrity Assessment • Based upon our visual observations there was no indication of structural distress or damage. I 01 9 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station 110 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our visual observations and test results we offer the following conclusions: • The current roof Teaks are the major source of moisture in the building. • Standing water from roof drains and condensate lines adjacent to the exterior walls can migrate through the exterior walls to the interior space. • Dust, dirt, cobweb, insect debris, etc. were observed on horizontal surfaces indicating poor housekeeping, and underscored by the additional airborne particulate results. • Of the ten interior temperature readings obtained 3 readings (ranging from 67.3 to 69.2 degrees F) were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels. • Of the ten interior Relative Humidity (%) readings obtained 5 readings (ranging from 64.5% to 87.4% RH) were above ASHRAE recommended levels. • Of the ten interior carbon dioxide readings obtained 3 readings (ranging from 1111 to 1139) were above ASHRAE recommended levels. • The interior spore trap air sample results did not indicate significantly, elevated microbial levels when compared to the two outside air samples 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS As requested, AMEC has prepared the following recommendations for corrective actions based on the issues identified during our evaluation: 1. After the roof has been replaced then the water -stained, SVM ceiling tiles and wet fiberglass insulation should be replaced. Rusted louvers and metal components/grids should be replaced/repainted. Confirmation that all supply ducts are properly insulated, to reduce potential condensation issues, should also occur. 2. Replace missing light fixture or cover opening in soffit. 3. Install weather-stripping to all doors between conditioned space and the exterior and replace worn weather stripping. 4. Provide means to divert rain and condensate water away from the building. 5. Adjust sprinklers to stop water from spraying on the building walls. 6. Re -grade the soil and sod along the south side of the building to lower the soil elevation to be below the floor slab elevation and to provide positive drainage away from the building and to eliminate the standing water. 7. AMEC recommends inspection and cleaning of mold -impacted and dirty HVAC Units, ducts and components using a hypochlorite (10% bleach and water) solution, BBJ MicroBiocide, Oxine, EnviroCon, Fiberlock Shockwave, or Fosters 40-80. Remove and replace all mold or water -damaged HVAC or duct insulation. Note, all mold remediation activities are to be accomplished by experienced, properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, etal. 8. Since improperly conducted mold remediation activities can create additional issues, it is recommended that all mold remediation activities be accomplished by experienced, 10 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #10 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, etal. Additionally, third -party mold remediation monitoring and air testing should be conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the mold remediation contractor's activities. 9. Improve housekeeping to reduce visible dirt, dust, insect parts, etc. Improved housekeeping is likely to reduce elevated skin counts identified in the 1st floor Bunk Room and Kitchen. 10. AMEC recommends consulting with a licensed mechanical .engineer or contractor to review the HVAC systems. It does not appear that the current systems can provide sufficient dehumidification to remove moisture during the system's cooling cycle, since some of the relative humidity readings were greater than 60%. If HVAC systems are sized incorrectly or are running inefficiently, this can lead to ineffective moisture control. 11. AMEC also recommends testing, adjusting, and balancing of the HVAC system components to determine if the HVAC system provides airflows that are in accordance with the design specifications. Additionally, confirm that temperature settings for the HVAC system are accurate and raise temperature levels in the location identified as below ASHRAE recommended guidelines. 12. Confirm that a proper air barrier has been installed between the conditioned finished space and the "naturally ventilated" plenum space above the dropped ceiling tiles and batting, in order to prevent the potential for plenum moisture, in accordance with applicable Florida Building Code (Mechanical). Acceptable air barriers are generally made of durable, nonporous materials and are sealed to adjoining wall, ceiling or floor surfaces with suitable long -life mastics. 13. Follow up testing and inspections should be performed after the recommendations described above are completed. 6.0 LIMITATIONS AMEC has endeavored to observe the existing conditions within the finished areas of the Indian River County Fire Station #10 using generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of our assessment, there is always a possibility some areas were overlooked or inaccessible, or are different from those specific assessment locations. If conditions related to indoor air quality, other than those identified in this report, is identified in the subject spaces, AMEC should be contacted to evaluate the findings and conclusions in this report in Tight of the new information. This report is intended for the exclusive use of Indian River County Government. The findings are relative to the date of our site visit and should not be relied upon for substantially previous and/or later dates. Ib9 BUILDING PLAN 110 P:\6380 IEQ\PROJECTS\2014-PROJECTS\1233 IRC FOUR FIRE STATIONS\DWGS\6380-14-1233 INDIAN RIVER FD.DWG JAMES.PICKERING 9/04/14 - 11:45:22 AM ACTIVE ROOF LEAK AAO1 READY ROOM/ KITCHEN QA03 QA04 DORMITORY 2 BR #1 ACTIVE ROOF LEAK BR #2 OFFICE AA02 STORAGE APPARATUS ROOM BR #3 SUPPLIES EXERCISE STANDING WATER STATION #10 ® FLOOR PLAN SCALE: N.T.S. LEGEND 0 SPORE TRAP LOCATIONS HIGH MOISTURE READINGS 62 N. BROADWAY FELLSMERE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ame AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #: CA -5397 INSPECTED RLJ/CG PROJECT 6380141233 DRAWN JSP PHASE CHECKED DATE 2014-09-04 SHEET TITLE FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER 1 111 PHOTOS !RC Fire Station #1O AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 1 Front Elevatio Photo 3 Missing Iight fixture right of entry door Photo 5 Roof dram right of entry door discharging adjacent to building wall Taken July 22,20y4 Report Photo Log Photo 2 Entry doors on North side of building Photo 4 Window leftofappanatuobaydoors—SVMond condensation on exterior Photo 6 Evidence of tawn sprmnkter spraying exterior wall outside of kitchen 1 |Y \��'^� ' , �~ IRC Fire Station #10 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 7 Drain splash block sloped back towards building at north west corner Photo 9 Roof drain and water heater overflow drain with SVM and no drainage away from building Photo 11 Exhaust fan cover from storage room with SVM Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 8 Condensate drain from dormitory A/C with no P - trap and no drainage away from building Photo 10 Condensate drain from icemaker with SVM and no drainage away from building Photo 12 Crack in window sill outside exercise room — moisture intrusion inside 2 n �+ IRC Fire Station #10 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 13 Standing water along south side of building Photo 15 Diffuser in kitchen with SVM and dirty Photo 17 Underside of stove vent hood — needs cleaning and vent flapper on exterior wall broken Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 14 Door from office area into apparatus bay — no weather-stripping, SVM on frame Photo 16 Door from apparatus bay into kitchen — weather- stripping is worn Photo 18 Stained ceiling tiles in center of dormitory and temporary water trap 3 1-15 07CFire Station #/0 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 19 Wet insulation above photo 18 Photo 21 Drinking fountain outside bathrooms #rust and SVM 1 and 2 — ' Photo 23 Bathroom #2 — exhaust fan vented out to soffit — rust on ceiling grid and return air grill Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 20 Evidence of leak at roof dram penetration through roof above photos 18 and 19 Photo 22 Shower in bathroom #1 - SVM Photo 24 Evidence of leaking at roof dram penetration through roof above sinks in bathroom #2 4 IRC Fire Station #10 AMEC Project Number 6380-144233 Photo 25 Icemaker with SVM Photo 27 Uncovered trash container in kitchen Photo 29 Dispatch Office, Q-trak readings Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 26 Vehicular exhaust system in apparatus bay — not used due to equipment changes Photo 28 South side of building, soil level is above interior floor slab level Photo 30 Dust on AHU filter grill 5 (11 IRC Fire Station #10 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 31 Marked filter Photo 33 Dust on flexible fiberglass ducts above ceiling tiles Photo 35 Ceiling of Bathroom #1, shower area Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 32 Q-trak and Thermostat comparison Photo 34 Ceiling of Bathroom #1, shower area Photo 36 Condenser 6 h1$ IRC Fire Station #10 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 37 South wall of weight room, protimeter reading Photo 39 South wall of exercise room, around window Photo 41 Bathroom #3, south wall Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 38 South wall of weight room, protimeter reading Photo 40 South wall of exercise room, around window Photo 42 Bathroom #3, south wall 7 119 IRC Fire Station #10 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 43 Window A/C in storage room next to Bathroom #3 Taken July 22, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 44 Window A/C in exercise room 8 I 9 LABORATORY REPORTS 171 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab(@.emsl.com Order ID: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: 341406391 AMECH25 C012301233 .ctn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River Fire Station #10 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/22/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/25/2014 Test Report: Air-O-CeII(TM) Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: 341406391-0001 A01-20487192 150 Front Entry - Exterior 341406391-0002 A02-20487044 150 Dispatch Office 341406391-0003 A03-20487072 150 Ready Rm/Kitchen Soore Tvoes Raw Cnunt Cnuntlma °G of Tnfal Raw Cnunt Cnuntlma % of Tntal Raw Count Cnunt/m3 °/ of Tntal Alternaria 1* 7' 0.2 - - - - . - - Ascospores 32 670 23.2 2 40 14.6 1* 7" 3.4 Aspergillus/Penicillium 7 100 3.5 1 20 7.3 6 100 48.3 Basidiospores 51 1100 38.1 3 60 21.9 3 60 29 Bipolaris++ 1* 7* 0.2 . 1* 7' 2.5 - - - Chaetomium - - - 1 20 7.3 - - - Cladosporium 21 440 15.2 - - - 2 40 19.3 Curvularia 1* 7` 0.2 1 20 7.3 - - - Epicoccum - - - - - - - - - Fusarium - - - - - - - - - Ganoderma 8 200 6.9 1' 7* 2.5 - - - Myxomycetes++ 12 250 8.7 3 60 21.9 - - - Pithomyces 1 20 0.7 1 20 7.3 - - - Rust - - - - - - - - - Scopulariopsis - - .- - - - - - Stachybotrys - - - - - - - - - Torula - - - - - - - - - Ulocladium - - - - - - - - - Cercospora 4 80 2.8 - - - - - - Pestalotiopsis - - - 1 20 7.3 - - - Pyricularia - - - - - - - - - Trichoderma 1* 7* 0.2 - - - - - - Total Fungi 140 2888 100 15 274 100 12 207 100 Hyphal Fragment - - - 1 20 7.3 - - - Insect Fragment - - - - - - - - Pollen 3 60 2.1 1 20 7.3 - - - Analyt. Sensitivity 600x - 21 - - 21 - - 21 - Analyt. Sensitivity 300x - 7* - - 7* - - 7* - Skin Fragments (1-4) - 1 - - 2 - - 3 - Fibrous Particulate (1-4) - 1 - - 2 - - 1 - Background (1-5) - 2 - - 2 - - 2 - Bipolaris++ = Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes -I+ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discemable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 indicate an overloading of background particulates, prohibiting accurate defection and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit Is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or insect fragment. '4'4' Denotes particles found at 300X. "-" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full. without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of lest results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. nples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FLAIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 Initial report from: 07/28/2014 09:40:36 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 09:40:36AM Page 1 of 2 Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) test report: AIr-V-,..eut"', rduaryaw v.. w.ya...r.."....... • .-...-.-.-._ Lab Sample Number: 341406391-0004 341406391-0005 Client Sample ID: A04-20486944 A05-20487204 Volume (L): 150 150 Sample Location: Bunk Exit off Kitchen - Exterior Tvpes Raw Count Cnttntlma °/ of Total Raw Count Countlma °/ of Total Snore Alternaria - - - - Ascospores 1 20 6.1 245 5100 68 Aspergillus/Penicillium 9 200 61.2 13 270 3.6 Basidiospores 3 60 18.3 30 620 8.3 Bipolaris++ - - - - - - Chaetomium - - - - - - Cladosporium- - - 30 620 8.3 Curvularia 1* 7* 2.1 2 40 0.5 Epicoccum Fusarium - - - - - - - - " - - Ganoderma - - - - - Myxomycetes++ 2 40 12.2 37 770 10.3 Pithomyces - - - 1 20 0.3 Rust - - - - Scopulariopsis - - - - - - Stachybotrys - - - - - - Torula - - - - - Ulocladium - - - - Cercospora - - - - Pestalotiopsis - - - - Pyricularia - - - 3 60 0.8 Trichoderma - - - - - - Total Fungi 16 327 100 361 7500 100 Hyphal Fragment - - - - - - Insect Fragment - - - Pollen 1 20 6.1 - - - Analyt. Sensitivity 600x- 21 - - 21 Analyt. Sensitivity 300x7 Skin Fragments (1-4)- - ' 2 - - - 7*- - 1 - Fibrous Particulate (1-4)- Background (1-5)- 1 2 - - - 1 - 2 - EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab a(�emsl.com Order ID: 341406391 Customer ID: AMECH25 Customer PO: C012301233 Project ID: Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River Fire Station #10 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/22/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/25/2014 l Bipolaris++ =Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes++ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discemable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory e High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background particulates, prohibiting accurate detection and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit Is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or Insect fragmenL "" Denotes particles found at 300X. ." Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the clienL Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL AIM -LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 Initial report from: 07/28/2014 09:40:36 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 09:40:36AM Page 2 of 2 i g3 18 September 2014 Ms. Beth Martin — Risk Manager Risk Management Division Indian River County 1800 271h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-0310 ame Phone: +1 (772) 567-8000 Ext 1287 Email: bmartinPircgov.com Subject: Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment Indian River County Fire Station #11 2555 93rd Street Wabasso, Florida AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Dear Ms. Martin: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) has completed the Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Assessment requested by Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM) at Fire Station #11. The field survey including spore trap air sampling was performed by Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens, Industrial Hygienist Technician on 23 July 2014. Our field services for this limited inspections and IAQ Assessment were conducted in general accordance with AMEC Proposal 14PROP0010.6380.0349, Revision 1,dated 10 July 2014 and as authorized by Purchase Order #69508-00. AMEC appreciates the opportunity to have been of assistance to you on this project and is looking forward to working with you as your consultant in the future. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully, C Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. tiff 11s Ronald C. Trapane, Mq, CIEC Lisa M. Prieto, P.E. Russell E. Stauffer, P. ., CIEC Program Manager Orlando Office Manager Attachments: Building Plan Photographs Laboratory Report Mold Assessor #MRSA -2010 P:163801EQ\PROJECTS12014-Projects11233 IRC Four Fire Statlons\Station #1111233 Report Station#11.docx Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 75 East Amelia Street, Suite 200 Orlando, Florida 32801 USA Tel +1 (407) 522-7570 Fax +1 (407) 522-7576 2 18 September 2014 Indian River County fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION Information concerning this project was obtained from a request for proposal dated 6 June 2014 from Ms. Beth Martin with Indian River County Risk Management (IRCRM). Additional information was obtained at a meeting held on July 22, 2014 at IRCRM office. The meeting was attended by Ms. Beth Martin (Risk Manager), Mr. John King (Fire Chief), Mr. Brian Burkeen (Assistant Chief), Mr. Roger L. Jeffery, P.E. and Mr. Carver Gittens with AMEC. Mr. Burkeen accompanied us during our inspection and provided additional information during the inspection. The fire station was reportedly built in 2001 and consists of approximately 7,080 gross square feet with 3,980 square feet of living area. The roof replacement with asphalt shingles was out to bid at the time of our inspection. The date of repainting of the exterior of the building is not known. A plan depicting the building layout is attached. A partial set of building plans were made available for our use. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work for this project included the following tasks: Task 1 - Site Visit, Observations, and Comfort Parameter Screening Our services for this task included a site visit to conduct visual observations and obtaining selected indoor air quality measurements within the fire station. The comfort parameter and other measurements, consisting of carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and airborne particulates, were compared with ASHRAE, OSHA, and NIOSH, standards to establish the conditions in the subject area at the time of the evaluation. Measurements were collected in numerous locations within the subject area, as well as outside the fire station, for baseline comparison purposes. Task 2 — Heating, Ventilation, and Air -Conditioning (HVAC) System Observation AMEC conducted a visual observation of the HVAC systems serving the building. Our services included a walk-through of the interior spaces and mechanical areas with the person responsible for the maintenance of the system to observe the operation, general maintenance and housekeeping characteristics of the associated HVAC systems. The interiors of representative air handler units were observed. Task 3 — Microbial Sampling In order to assess the potential presence or absence of mold amplification, AMEC collected a total of six spore trap air samples from inside representative areas of the building, and two outside samples for comparative purposes. The samples were sent to an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory and analyzed for viable and non-viable fungi. Laboratory analysis of the spore trap air samples included basic (outside) and expanded (inside) fungal analysis using direct optical microscopy. The expanded (interior) analysis included insect parts, skin cell fragments, and inorganic particles, useful to indicate if current housing keeping measures are sufficient/effective at the fire station. The spore trap samples were collected on spore trap (air -o -cell) utilizing a calibrated high volume - sampling pump. The sample results are included in our report and were compared against industry guidelines and recommendations. Sampling to address infectious disease control was beyond our scope of services. 1 8S 3 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station 111 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Task 4 — Moisture Intrusion Assessment (Protimeter) Our services for this task included a site visit to observe building finishes in order to evaluate if areas were impacted by moisture intrusion and to confirm the presence or absence of suspect visible mold growth. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. We performed non-destructive testing for elevated moisture content of representative finishing materials using a Protimeter moisture meter. Task 5 — Structural Integrity Assessment Our services for this task included a site visit to observe the visible existing structural framing and assess areas of distress or indications of loss of structural integrity. This task was conducted by a Florida Professional Engineer (PE) specializing in Structural Engineering. If available we reviewed original construction plans prior to our assessment. No destructive testing or removal of finishes was included in our scope of work. Task 6 - Report Preparation At the completion of our site visits, a report was prepared to summarize the information obtained. This report discussed our visual observations, Protimeter evaluations, and the results of our comfort parameter screening measurements and airborne microbial sampling results. 3.0 FINDINGS 3.1 Visual Observations Exterior • There are cracks in the stucco adjacent to the apparatus bay doors • There are cracks in the stucco under the window on the west side • There is mold and mildew at the ice machine condensate drain and no p -trap • There are limited amount of gutters at the roof edges • The exhaust fan vent for the stove has no closure flap • There is SVM and condensation on the exterior door into the kitchen • There is SVM and condensation on the exterior door into the dormitory Interior • Interior walls of Admin side have Hardie Board in lieu of drywall • The return air grill in the meeting room has SVM and is dirty • There are stains on the ceiling tiles and the drywall plenum above the ceiling tiles outside of the ADA bathroom • There are stains on the ceiling tiles and the drywall plenum above the ceiling tiles in the life guard offices • There is corrosion at the washing machine water and drain connections 186 4 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 • There are stains on the ceiling tiles and the drywall plenum above the ceiling tiles in the exercise room • There is evidence of pest infestation in the attic by the evidence of chewed insulation • Identified SVM on Drywall and Ceiling Tile in Plenum at Hallway and Lifeguard Room ( Admin Area) • Return vents are dirty and dusty. • Air Vents in Conference Room and Lifeguard Office has dust particles on surrounding ceiling tiles • The fiberglass batt insulation above the ceiling tiles has been moved out of position in numerous locations. There is no indication that an "air barrier exists between the conditioned occupied spaces and the vented attic. If an effective air barrier is not present, un -conditioned, hot humid air (particularly during the summer months) from the vented attic is allowed to come into contact with the metal ducts and supply/return components and ceiling tiles which are cooled by the HVAC for the occupied spaces below. This condition can be exacerbated by low thermostat set points (typically well below 72 degrees Fahrenheit) in the occupied areas. Painted drywall/joint compound walls and suspended acoustical tile ceiling with fiberglass batt insulation above are typically not air barriers as defined by Florida Building Code (FBC). The lack of an effective air barrier can result in condensation control issues, moisture vapor control issues, and higher heating and cooling costs. • Dust, dirt, cobweb, insect debris, etc. were observed on horizontal surfaces indicating poor housekeeping, even though the observations were limited. • There are moisture stains on the floor in the men's room • There are stained ceiling tiles and rusted return air grill in the dormitory HVAC • AHU #3 has some rust and light moisture at coil, SVM visible on exterior of unit South Interior fiberglass insulation • AHU #2 and #1 Coils and Piping have some rust, dust and light moisture , EcoAire Pleated Filters 3.2 Moisture Screening Moisture testing was conducted by using a Protimeter non-destructive moisture meter to evaluate the presence and extent of elevated moisture within representative interior door and window areas. AMEC also obtained limited moisture readings from representative window sills and walls around walls and doors because the interior walls are constructed with "Hardie Board". The Protimeter "Probe Mode" readings, ranging from 0 to 14 wood moisture equivalent (WME) are considered to have "Air Dry Conditions" and are consistent with typical wallboard in office environments which has not been impacted by elevated moisture. Readings ranging from 15 to 19 are considered to be "At Risk" for moisture problems. Readings 20 and above indicate moisture content typical of finishes which have been impacted by moisture intrusion. Surface moisture levels within three of the six interior spaces revealed levels that were indicative of being impacted by moisture intrusion and are highlighted in bold in the following Table No. 1. IS 5 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air QuailtyAssessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Table No. 1; Surface Moisture Readings Location / Suspect Visible_ MoldM) ; (SV :: Protimeter. ': Readings W M_E) Conditions Interior — Admin Area Interior Wall 132-168 Moisture Intrusion Interior — Weight Room around Windows and Door 7.3-11.9 Air Dry Interior - Dormitory 114-139 Moisture Intrusion Interior- Ladies Restroom Ceiling 9.1-9.6 Air Dry Interior — Men's Restroom 9.5-10.1 Air Dry Interior— Interior Walls 125-162 Moisture Intrusion Prepared By: CT Checked By: RU 3.3 Comfort Parameter Screening Testing for the basic comfort parameters (carbon dioxide, temperature, relative humidity, and particulates) associated with indoor air quality was also conducted within interior finished areas. For comparison purposes, testing was also conducted at locations outside of the fire station. Temperature and relative humidity were monitored during AMEC's site visit with a TSI Q -Trak 8550 hand—held hygrometer/thermometer. Temperature Levels Temperature and relative humidity levels can be considered as indicators of the HVAC system's ability to handle building thermal loads. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has not established temperature and relative humidity limits. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 55-2004, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, recommends that summertime (mechanical cooling) temperatures are maintained between 73 and 79 degrees Fahrenheit, and that wintertime (mechanical heating) temperatures are maintained between 68 and 74 degrees Fahrenheit. At the time site visit was conduction on the outside temperature was measured at 78 degrees Fahrenheit so ASHRAE summertime guidelines are referenced. During the site visit, the temperature thermostats at the fire station was set at 70 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the Administrative area, with confirmatory readings from the TSI Q -Trak at 74.8 degrees F, the Ready Room was set at 70 degrees F and confirmed at 71.7 degrees F and the Dorm room thermostat was set at 65 degrees F and confirmed at 71.2 degrees F. Relative Humidity Levels The ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, notes that ... Relative humidity in habitable spaces preferably should be maintained between 30% and 60% relative humidity to minimize growth of allergenic or pathogenic organisms. The Standard also notes that ... if the 6 78 September 2014 Indian River County fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 relative humidity in occupied spaces and low velocity ducts and plenums exceeds 70%, fungal contamination (for example, mold, mildew, etc) can occur. Relative humidity should be maintained between 30 to 60 percent during all seasons, since humidity above 60 percent may contribute to the growth of mold and bacteria on porous indoor surfaces. Carbon Dioxide Levels CO2 readings were obtained from both inside and outside as part of the evaluation process. Current guidelines provided in the ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, is calculated by adding 700 parts per million (ppm) to the carbon dioxide concentration level measured outside the building and was used as the basis for our evaluation. This calculation corresponds to an outdoor air intake of 15-20 cubic feet per minute (CFM), per person. Therefore, the exterior 385 ppm CO2 value established a target value of 1,085 for CO2 (385 + 700 = 1,085 ppm). The results of our comfort parameter readings are summarized in the following Table No. 2. Comfort Parameter Measurements Location Date:. Time CO2 (ppr)) Temp. (F.) . Relative Humidity (%)° Target Values 1085 (385 + 700) 73-79 (summertime) 30-60 Conference Room 7-23-14 9:00 am 549 75.1 42.6 Dispatch Office 7-23-14 9:10 am 711 74.8 46.1 Life Guard Office 7-23-14 9:15 am 560 74.6 49.2 ADA Bathroom 7-23-14 9:20 am 700 74.1 55.3 Life Guard Office Above Ceiling Tile Plenum Space 7-23-14 9:24 am 637 74.2 50.9 Admin Area Hallway 7-23-14 9:40 am 688 74.7 52.3 Weight Room 7-23-14 9:43 am 889 81.2 78.9 Weight Room Above Ceiling Tiles 7-23-14 9:47 am 569 81.5 72.8 Dorm/Bunk Room 7-23-14 9:53 am 624 72.8 48.9 Dorm/Bunk Room Above Ceiling Tiles 7-23-14 9:56 am 533 70.1 51.3 Lounge/Reading Room 7-23-14 10:10 am 525 71.1 58.1 Lounge/Reading Room Above Ceiling Tiles 7-23-14 10:14 am 757 74.2 60.3 Kitchen 7-23-14 10:20 am 558 71.6 58.4 Kitchen Above Ceiling Tiles 7-23-14 10:23 am 654 74.2 62.9 Entry/Exit Door Off Kitchen Exterior 7-23-14 10:28 am 385 78.0 94.3 Ladies Restroom 7-23-14 10:40 am 555 73.2 57.4 Men's Restroom 7-23-14 10:45 am 530 65.6 48.3 Prepared By: CT Checked By: RL Results in bold indicate that test location measurements were not within ASHRAE recommended levels. I 81 7 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Of the fifteen interior temperature readings obtained (ranging from 65.6 to 81.5 degrees F), two readings were above ASHRAE recommended summertime levels and 4 readings were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels — possibly due to the thermostat settings and/or HVAC system inefficiencies. Of the fifteen interior Relative Humidity (%) readings obtained, 4 readings (ranging from 60.3% to 78.9% RH) were above ASHRAE recommended levels — with the weight room reading (below the ceiling) being the most problematic. Of the fifteen interior carbon dioxide readings obtained all readings (ranging from 530 to 757) were within ASHRAE recommended levels. 3.4 Mold Air Testing Six air samples were obtained using spore trap (air -o -cell) within the fire station, while two samples were obtained from outside at the beginning and end of AMEC's site visit on 23 July 2014. The samples were returned, using chain of custody procedures to EMLab P&K Inc., an AIHA EMLAP accredited laboratory. The samples were analyzed for viable and non-viable fungal spores. Copies of the laboratory reports are attached to this report for your reference. Table 3 summarizes the results of the biological particle analysis: Table 3 - Spore Trap Results — Bioloctical Particles Sample( Location TOTAL Spore Counts (m3) 3 Predominant Type Spore Count (m3) (A01-) Exterior — Front/Main Entry Total Exterior Spore Counts — 9,400 (A02-) Interior — Conference Room Total Spore Counts — 404 No individual spore types exceeded either of the two respective outside samples (A03-) Interior — Lifeguard Office Total Spore Counts - 60 No individual spore types exceeded either of the two respective outside samples (A04-) Interior — Weight room Total Spore Counts —1,790 Four individual spore types exceeded the two respective outside samples (A05-) Interior — Dorm/Bunk Room Total Spore Counts - 280 No individual spore types exceeded either of the two respective outside samples (A06-) Interior — Lounge/Ready Room Total Spore Counts - 797 One individual spore types exceeded the two respective outside samples �o 8 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Sample(1) Location TOTAL Spore Counts (m3) s Predominant Type Spore Count (m3) (A07) Interior - Kitchen Total Spore Counts - 200 No individual spore types exceeded either of the two respective outside samples (A08-) Exterior — Entry/Exit Door of Kitchen Total Exterior Spore Counts — 6,977 (1) Sample numbers are listed in parentheses * Exceeds both exterior samples for that spore type. The guidance of the AIHA journal, Indoor Health, Background Levels of Fungi, July/August 2003 consensus opinion is that the indoor microbial levels should be below the outdoor levels with no difference in the interior type. Four of the six interior sample results did not indicate elevated microbial levels, when compared to the average of the two outside samples. A slight, de minimus variation in Penicillium/Aspergillus in the Lounge/Ready Room was noted. However, more elevated levels were noted in the Weight Room with four individual fungal types at levels above or missing in the average of the corresponding outside samples. In addition, the total level in the Weight Room (1,790) was over three times higher than the average of the six interior sample levels (589). The laboratory analytical results are attached. As part of this scope we included expanded analysis of the interior spore trap air samples to include epithelial (skin) cells, and hyphal fragments. Table 4 summarizes the results of the expanded particle analysis: lq i 9 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Table 4 -Spore Trap Results — Expanded Particles Sampler�1 Location Hyphal Fragments (particles/m3) Epithelial (Skin) Cells (Loading Factor: {lightest} 1 thru 4 {heaviest}) (A01-) Exterior — Front/Main Entry Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 1 (A02-) Interior —Conference Room Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) CeIIs — 2 (A03-) Interior — Lifeguard Office Hyphal Fragments — 20 Epithelial (Skin) Cells -1 (A04-) Interior — Weight Room Hyphal Fragments — 20 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 (A05-) Interior — Dorm/Bunk Room Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 (A06-) Interior — Lounge/Ready Room Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 (A07) Interior - Kitchen Hyphal Fragments — 40 Epithelial (Skin) Cells — 2 (A08-) Exterior — Entry/Exit Door of Kitchen Hyphal Fragments — 0 Epithelial (Skin) Cells —1 (2) Sample numbers are listed in parentheses There is no consensus opinion as to the indoor particle levels for skin cells or hypha) fragments. However, higher hyphal fragment levels, relative to the other interior results were noted in three areas: Lifeguard Office, Weight Room and Kitchen. Coupled with the "higher" skin cell levels these can be indications of possible ineffective housekeeping. The laboratory analytical results are attached. 3.4 Structural Integrity Assessment • Based upon our visual observations there was no indication of structural distress or damage. iqa 10 18 September 2014 Indian River County Fire Station 111 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our visual observations and test results we offer the following conclusions: • Dust, dirt, cobweb, insect debris, etc. were observed on horizontal surfaces (tables, window sills, window blinds, shelves, counter tops, fluorescent light covers, etc.) and greasy and dusty diffuser louvers & returns were noted in the building, indicating poor housekeeping, and underscored by the additional airborne particulate results. • Visual evidence of both previous and current moisture intrusion through the roof indicate the existing roofing has deteriorated and needs to be replaced, in addition to stucco repairs. • Of the fifteen interior temperature readings obtained (ranging from 65.6 to 81.5 degrees F), two readings were above ASHRAE recommended summertime levels and 4 readings were below ASHRAE recommended summertime levels — possibly due to the thermostat settings and/or HVAC system inefficiencies. • Of the fifteen interior Relative Humidity (%) readings obtained, 4 readings (ranging from 60.3% to 78.9% RH) were above ASHRAE recommended levels — with the weight room reading (below the ceiling) being the most problematic. • Of the fifteen interior carbon dioxide readings obtained all readings (ranging from 530 to 757) were within ASHRAE recommended levels. • Four of the six interior sample results did not indicate elevated microbial levels, when compared to the average of the two outside samples. • A slight, de minimus variation in Penicillium/Aspergillus in the Lounge/Ready Room was noted. However, more elevated levels were noted in the Weight Room with four individual fungal types at levels above or missing in the average of the corresponding outside samples. In addition, the total level in the Weight Room was over three times higher than the average of the six interior sample levels. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS As requested, AMEC has prepared the following recommendations for corrective actions based on the issues identified during our evaluation: 1. After the roof has been replaced then the water -stained, SVM ceiling tiles and wet insulation should be replaced. Rusted louvers and metal components/grids should be replaced/repainted. Confirmation that all supply ducts are properly insulated, to reduce potential condensation issues, should also occur. 2. The cracks in the exterior stucco should be repaired. 3. Gutters should be added around the entire roof perimeter to reduce the amount of rain water falling on the exterior walls and allowing the rain water to be diverted away from the building. 4. Install a one-way flap to eliminate moist air entering into the stove vent. 5. Install or replace worn weather-stripping to all doors between conditioned space and the exterior. 6. The fibreglass batt insulation should be returned to the proper locations. 7. AMEC recommends inspection and cleaning of mold -impacted and dirty HVAC Units, ducts and components using a hypochlorite (10% bleach and water) solution, BBJ MicroBiocide, i9 3 11 18 September2014 Indian River County Fire Station #11 Report of Limited Inspections and Indoor Air Quality Assessment AMEC Project 6380-14-1233 Oxine, EnviroCon, Fiberlock Shockwave, or Fosters 40-80. Remove and replace all mold or water -damaged HVAC or duct insulation. Note, all mold remediation activities are to be accomplished by experienced, properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, etal. 8. Since improperly conducted mold remediation activities can create additional issues, it is recommended that all mold remediation activities be accomplished by experienced, properly trained personnel in accordance with the State of Florida Statutes 468.84, etal. Additionally, third -party mold remediation monitoring and air testing should be conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the mold remediation contractor's activities. 9. Improve housekeeping to reduce visible dirt, dust, insect parts, etc. Improved housekeeping is likely to reduce elevated skin counts identified. 10. AMEC recommends consulting with a licensed mechanical engineer or contractor to review the HVAC systems. It does not appear that the current systems can provide sufficient dehumidification to remove moisture during the system's cooling cycle. 11. AMEC also recommends testing, adjusting, and balancing of the HVAC system components to determine if the HVAC system provides airflows that are in accordance with the design specifications. Additionally, confirm that temperature settings for the HVAC system are accurate and raise temperature levels in the location identified as below ASHRAE recommended guidelines. We also recommend the use of automated controls to ensure the temperature settings remain within the ASHRAE recommended guidelines. 12. Confirm that a proper air barrier has been installed between the conditioned finished space and the "naturally ventilated" plenum space above the dropped ceiling tiles and batting, in order to prevent the potential for plenum moisture, in accordance with applicable Florida Building Code (Mechanical). Acceptable air barriers are generally made of durable, nonporous materials and are sealed to adjoining wall, ceiling or floor surfaces with suitable long -life mastics. 13. Follow up testing and inspections should be performed after the recommendations described above are completed. 6.0 LIMITATIONS AMEC has endeavoured to observe the existing conditions within the finished areas of the Indian River County Fire Station #11 using generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of our assessment, there is always a possibility some areas were overlooked or inaccessible, or are different from those specific assessment locations. If conditions related to indoor air quality, other than those identified in this report, is identified in the subject spaces, AMEC should be contacted to evaluate the findings and conclusions in this report in Tight of the new information. This report is intended for the exclusive use of Indian River County Govemment. The findings are relative to the date of our site visit and should not be relied upon for substantially previous and/or later dates. BUILDING PLAN "IA AAD6 REC ROOM KITCHEN AM7 ®AO EXERCISE ROOM AD'A DORMS APPARATUS ROOM srAnoN }r11 ®FLOOR PLAN SCALE r = TO' LEGEND A I SPORE TRAP LOCATIONS 2555 93rd 5T WARASSO WOIMI RIVER COUNTY EMEROEICY SERVICES INDIAN WVI]I COUNTT, FLORIDA AA01 amec0 WE0101GNi0 WM 111000 FUCNRE, INC LS1f2 Mal 151. OA HECTARE FLOOR PUN 1' OEN 19b PHOTOS 1 9 1 IRC Fire Station #11 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 1 Front Elevation Photo 3 Side elevation Photo 5 West side of building, north of apparatus bay doors -Crack in stucco Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 2 Front entry doors with SVM Photo 4 Window left of entry doors — SVM and condensation on exterior Photo 6 Inside looking out at Photo 5 — evidence of moisture intrusion 1 Iq$ IRC Fire Station #11 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 7 Stucco cracks under window, west side of building Photo 9 Section of gutter, not continuous around the building Photo 11 Rear door into kitchen — SVM and condensation on exterior of door Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 8 Mildew at ice machine drain and partially missing flap at dryer vent Photo 10 Exhaust vent cover from stove — no closure flap Photo 12 Rear door into dormitory — SVM and condensation around frame 2 1q9 IRC Fire Station #// AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 13 Diffuser in storage room #1 - SVM ,_� Photo 15 Window inmeotingmom.northaida— condonaation.inseu debris on sifl Photo 17 Stain on ceiling tile and penum drywall above — outside ADA bathroom Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 14 Door from entry area into apparatus bay — no weather-strippng, SVM on frame Photo 16 Return air grill in meeting room — SVM and dirt Photo 18 Stained ceiling tiles in life guard offices 3 Duo IRC Fire Station #11 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Moisture staining of plenum drywall above Photo 18 Photo 21 Stained ceiling tiles and rust of ceiling grids in exercise room Photo 23 Attic above exercise room — ducted exhaust from exercise room to soffit Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 20 Corrosion at washing machine water and drain connections Photo 22 Moisture staining of plenum drywall above Photo 21 Photo 24 Insulation chewed from piping in attic 4 aoI IRC Fire Station #11 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 25 Attic insulation moved from position and some partially rolled -up Photo 27 Return air grill in kitchen — SVM and dirty Photo 29 Men's restroom — moisture stains on floor tile Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 26 Exhaust vent stack with SVM Photo 28 Stained ceiling tiles and rusted return air grill in corner of dormitory Photo 30 Window in ready room with exterior shutters - condensation and SVM aog, IRC Fire Station #11 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 31 Q-trak and Thermostat comparison (Administrative section). Photo 33 S.V.M on seams of AHU #3 Photo 35 Clean, pleated and marked filter per unit Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 32 AHU #3 closet Photo 34 Leak at coolant to unit connection Photo 36 Hardie board, interior walls of Admin sect IRC Fire Station #11 AMEC Project Number 6380-144233 Photo 37 Q-trak and Thermostat comparison, Ready room Photo 39 AHU #1 and #2 Photo 41 S.V.M and dust on unit #2 Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 38 Q-trak and Thermostat comparison, Dorm Photo 40 Housing support under both units #1 and #2 Photo 42 S.V.M on unit #1 7 oy IRC Fire Station #11 AMEC Project Number 6380-14-1233 Photo 43 S.V.M on fiberglass insulation behind panel, unit #1 Photo 47 Condensers Taken July 23, 2014 Report Photo Log Photo 44 S.V.M on coils on unit #1 Photo 46 S.V.M and dust, unit #2 8 aos LABORATORY REPORTS ao(e EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 httr://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab(a..emsl.com Order ID: Customer ID: Customer PO: Project ID: 341406387 AMECH25 C012301233 Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River - Fire Station #11 Test Report: Air-O-Cell(TM') Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -341406387-0003 41 0 ASTM 0 7391) 341406387-0001 341406387-0002 4 406387-006 A01-20486999 A02-20487032 150 150 150 Conference Rm Lifeguard Office Front/Main Entry (Exterior) Raw Count Countlma e/a of Total Raw Count Countlm3 % of Total Raw Count Cou20 m3 % ofaTotal 40 6 100 24.8 1 Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/23/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/28/2014 Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: Spore Types Ascospores Aspergillus/Penicillium Basidiospores Bipolaris++ Chaetomium Cladosporium Curvularia Fusarium Ganoderma Myxomycetes++ Pithomyces Rust Stachybotrys Cercospora Dicranidion Helicomyces Microascus Monodictys Nigrospora Pestalotia Pyricularia Tetraploa Total Fungi Hyphal Fragment Insect Fragment Pollen Analyt. Sensitivity 600x Analyt. Sensitivity 300x Skin Fragments (1-4) Fibrous Particulate (1-4) Background (1-5) 11 361 6 840 8.9 230 2.5 7620 81.1 100 1.1 13 270 2.9 2 40 0.4 3 80 0.6 1 PO 0.2 1 20 0.2 1 20 0.2 2 40 0.4 2 40 0.4 5 100 1.1 448 9400 100 20 0.2 29 610 6.5 21 7* 13 1* 1* 20 5 270 66.8 7* 1.7 7* 1.7 22 404 100 1* 7* 1.7 21 7* 2 2 2 3* 5 20 33.3 20* 33.3 60 100 20 33.3 21 7* 2 IBipolaris++ =Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes++ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discemable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. r High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 indicate an overloading of background particulates, prohibiting accurate e t Is equal to one pon and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded or Insect fragment "*" Denotes particles found at 300X_ "-Denotes lnot detected.r Due t blank xcdetectione method stopping rules, raw counts In excess 00 are iextrapolated based on the spore. structure, pollen, fiber articlethe percentage analyzed. P EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FLAIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 Initial report from: 07/2812014 18:34:20 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsi.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 06:34:20PM Page1 of 3 at) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolabto7emsl.com : Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River - Fire Station #11 Phone: Fax: Collected: Received: Analyzed: Order ID: 341406387 Customer ID: AMECH25 Customer PO: C012301233 Project ID: (407) 522-7570 (ema) it -only 07/23/2014 07/24/2014 07/28/2014 Test Report: Air-O-Cell(TM Analysis of Fungal Spores & Pa i Lab Sample Number: Client Sample ID: Volume (L): Sample Location: 341406387-0004 A04-20481658 160 Weight Room 341406387-0005 A05-20481430 150 DormlBunk Rm 341406387-0006 A06-20486954 150 Lounge/Ready Rm Spore Types Raw Count Count/m' % of Total Raw Count Count/m' % of Total Raw Count Count/m3 % of Total Ascospores 15 320 17.9 2 40 14.3 6 100 12.5 Aspergillus/Penicillium 14 300 16.8 2 40 14.3 16 340 42.7 Basidiospores 41 870 48.6 8 200 71.4 7 100 12.5 Bipolaris++ 1 20 1.1 - - - - - - Chaetomium - - - - - - - - - Cladosporium 2 40 2.2 - - - 11 230 28.9 Curvularia 3 60 3.4 - - - 1' 7* 0.9 Fusarium - - - - - - - - - Ganoderma 4 80 4.5 - - - - - Myxomycetes++ 1 20 1.1 - - - 1 20 _ 2.5 Pithomyces - - - - - - . - - - Rust - - - - - - - - - Stachybotrys - - - - - - - - - Cercospora 1 20 1.1 - - - - - - Dicranidion - - - - - - - - - Helicomyces - - - - - - - - - Microascus - - - - - - - - - Monodictys - - - - - - - - - Nigrospora 1 20 1.1 - - - - - - Pestalotia 1 20 1.1 - - - - - - Pyricularia 1 20 1.1 - - - - - - Tetraploa - - - - - - - - - Total Fungi Hyphal Fragment 85 1 1790 20 100 1.1 12 - 280 - 100 42 7 - 100 Insect Fragment - - - -. - - - - Pollen 4 80 4.5 - - - - - - Analyt. Sensitivity 600x - 21 - - 21 - - 21 - Analyt. Sensitivity 300x - 7' - - 7* - - 7* - Skin Fragments (1-4) - 2 - 2 - - 2 - Fibrous Particulate (1-4) - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - Background (1-5) - 3 - - 1 - - 2 - mmenfs: ample contains RARE amount of fiber glass -like particles. Sample Comments: 341406387-0006 Sample contains RARE amount of fiber glass -like particles. Bipolaris++=Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes++ = Myxomycetes/Periconia/Smut No discemable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background particulates. prohibiting accurate defection and quantification. Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or insect fragment. "" Denotes particles found at 300X. -" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules. raw counts In excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by EMSL EMSL bears no responsIbllity for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client Samples received In good condition unless otherwlse noted. mples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FLAIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 • ,,titial report from: 07/28/2014 18:34:20 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com ast Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 06:34:20PM Page 2 of 3 Spore Types Ascospores Aspergillus/Penicillium Basidiospores Bipolaris++ Chaetomium Cladosporium Curvularia Fusarium Ganoderma Myxomycetes++ Pithomyces Rust Stachybotrys Cercospora Dicranidion Helicomyces Microascus Monodictys Nigrospora Pestalotia Pyricularia Tetraploa Total Fungi Hyphal Fragment Insect Fragment Pollen EMSL Analytical, Inc. 5125 Adanson Street, Suite 900 Orlando, FL 32804 Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab(oemsl.com Order ID: 341406387 Customer ID: AMECH25 Customer PO: C012301233 Project ID: Attn: Ron Trapane AMEC E&I, Inc. 75 E. Amelia Street Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 Proj: 6380-14-1233.01 Indian River - Fire Station #11 Test Report: Air-O-CeU(TM) Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods EMSL 05 -TP -003, ASTM D7391) Lab Sample Number: 341406387-0007 341406387-0008 Client Sample ID: A07-20487047 A08-20486965 Volume (L): 150 150 Sample Location: Kitchen EntrylExit Door off Kitchen (Exterior) Raw Count Countlma % of Total Raw Count Countlma % of Total 480 40 73 1500 21.5 1 20 10 11 230 3.3 3 60 30 144 3040 43.6 2* 10* 0.1 - - Phone: (407) 522-7570 Fax: (ema) it -only Collected: 07/23/2014 Received: 07/24/2014 Analyzed: 07/28/2014 Analyt. Sensitivity 600x Analyt. Sensitivity 300x Skin Fragments (1-4) Fibrous Particulate (1-4) Background (1-5) Sample Comments: 2 10 2 40 200 40 20 21 7* 2 20 100 20 10 1 - 2 - 76 1600 22.9 3 60 0.9 2 40 0.6 1 20 0.3 11 230 3.3 1 20 0.3 3 B0 0.9 1 20 0.3 1 20 0.3 9* 60* 0.9 2 40 0.6 1 20 0.3 1. 7* 0.1 342 6977 100 9 200 2.9 21 7* 2 341406387-0008 Sample contains RARE amount of algae -like organisms. (Bipolaris++=Bipolaris/Drechslera/Exserohilum Myxomycetes -HF = Myxomycetes/Periconia/S mut No discernable field blank was submitted with this group of samples. High levels of background particulate can obscure spores and other particulates leading to underestimation. Background levels of 5 Indicate an overloading of background particulspore, structure, ates, prohibiting accurate e ank corrected unless otherwise noted. en, fiber detection or insect fragment "Pr Denotes particles etected on fo found at 300X. "-" ed Denotes les. Results not detected. Due to method stopping rules,, raw counts In excess se eof 11ion 00 are/t Is equal to one extrapolated based onithe percentage analyzed. particle EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysts. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received In good condition unless otherwise noted. Samples analyzed by EMSLAnalytical, Inc. Orlando, FLAIHA-LAP, LLC EMLAP 163563 Initial report from: 07/28/2014 18:34:20 For Information on the fungi listed in this report please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com Test Report SPVER3-7.30.4 Printed: 7/28/2014 06:34:20PM Blanca Cortes, Ph.D., Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory Page 3 of 3 a09 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PI NEWSPAPERS Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 SCRIPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Sherri Cipriani. who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Copvline PO # INDIAN RIVER CO PLANNING 2680809 319/2015 NOTICE HEARING 3/24/15 Swor6i to and subscrib= d before me this day of, March 09, 2015, by Sherri Cipriani [X] personally known to me or [ ] who has produced as identification. , who is (jo1-e-n Sandra Coldren SANDRA COLDREN MY COMMISSION # FF 004035 EXPIRES: April 1, 2017 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Notary Public NEWSPAPER E -Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED ********************* DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES ORIGINAL Indian River County Planning Depa... a) U U C a) Q Q Ad Number: Insertion Number: N/A Section-Page-Zone(s) : 1 Col x 175 ag NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA U a) 0 Monday, March 09, 2015 TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARWG NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVENhat the Board of County Comm...ion . of Ndian a Rw°haxl hCounogdty. Floride which hies ng in . which genies in Iha aa. ensu too 1,e .n ote tun, Po be heard, In ry commix NIon Chamber. of e County Adminir Usti n Bulidrnl3lo 2.. • 1o01 TF 6arset Vero Beech, 010110E OF SALE NOTICE Florida, on Tuesday, March 24, 1015 at &0optionnn of ton. titled NO110E PLANDARDS FOR NED DEVELOP- MENT; SY AMEND- ING SECTION PLANK OF NO Of I 6AD DECI- ONS TO NOTICE OF SALE_ OR DVI ICA NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE TIT? ON; AND EDE FFECTERABILI- TIVE OATS. Said o dtnence. i If doa Ple> e„2E, ing wll12 grnl dIom Petrol* Te 11'r d 1 Adjm,menl l.leo known as th. board of 31. a1u21- sI.arMavillalM uo*. n aat backs and other 1°'1, lei°Ie'alei rn criteria; tO e'paa1,e•dt alb nae. ea Manmveeria [3 b .P Ion rni NOTICE OF 5ALE. NOTICE A draft of the pre- p posed Ordinance le available at 0w Plan - ng Division office located In the corm iry ae2elu 0,,, ,7 Milo AdAdministration nl ah. C3 Vy*I B`ue ildnio '3 dei Tion awM1 0, ma be made •t r. IR MONDAY, MARCH 9, 2015 • SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS • 11 NOTICE Plane direct plan - i1)9 -cal tted men lions to he current dev.l5133].opmenl ..21121, .122 ONE WHO ECIAL NOTICE DF SALE TAT 22512 Le S) W HW ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONFAS NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE BY -r Wesley S. Davi , Chairman To be advertised March 9. 2015 TCN3615809 -.... NOTICE OF ACTION IN THE cram COURT OF THE NIcl0L CIRC 5*1151 CIRCUIT INANO FOR 1j1.01 N RORIOA GENEML JUflIS0 5709 1NNSWN Gas Na. Bank °uccemaer<°' NA., . by NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE OF ACPON NOTICE OF ACTION Lmerger to BAC Home TO:Ea I° Tr.., P` o' IK2* C292), *1d5 yawn 020. 10.,, s°weo Bea. ..r., Vera 'rap LP 0Oa) wn Addra: 16011)1 111K1no1 NW 123rnd Lane. RSddic8. FL Josh Fisher; 1 ]2296 Spoon of Josh d Rs 22.01 YOU ARE HEREBY 2922)9.9. MenNOTto forecan a lose Eleg25)2 Re in a- Men to lorec12ae an Syne loi Ceues lowing pb°per5Y in 4nywide Bank, N.A.; Indian Brvn C°unry, 5915 Trate n Ve Beachme3 Atn1)..N°., lec; 1r glia T,sce Properly 5)09. L*T 90 I- Ownen Asaoanon 610 N, PLAT 8 9/0 °Bud b4 t),PAGEAC NT od.°dam. EAGLE ACCORDING UNIT 1, E PLAT THER OF. NOTICE dACTION- THE PLAT THEREOF, CO SETRVICE"E 50001 9. PAGEI51 NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE OF ACTION l2, 13 AN0 1,, PUS UC 0000005 OF Ili DIAN RIVER COON 00, FLIXN00. Na ben Bled 59eim Miredd iaa servo< p v 12 f roar whale 20 2.20! B °nvv..a 0 JEsgn .,MDG& la, 11. PC, Brock 5 5cn[1, PLLC., In PlainUll'a a.rOrney 1,0. dd.ov. 1501 N.W. 191 Slrvn 6uit. 2129, it 33308, within titin IMI asl 1p2bli,)l cn,e " den 3 beloro Myr° ]t, MI6. s�d Nle aM1 °diyiore nheP Mar be NOTICE OF SALE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA CASE 50. 3201/CA001270)00 XX OBI ASSET MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO BANK NA, n Trustee lot the registered holden 3 BANK 0f AMERICA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INC. COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, .EWES 2005-1, M LLC, . Delaware limit d liability company, in its capacity .5 .p°o°I service pursuant to [hale Hain Pooling and Sen inn9 Apr«mens dated A rill, 2005,PI+in1111, IR MALL ASSOCIATES LTD. a Florida limned partnership; INDIAN RP/ER MALL LLC, . Delawa a limited liability company. el rl.. Defendants. ry NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE ae HI M r meter. lthat older. of BANK Final OF Judgment AMERICA (COMMERCIAL°ndered on M MORTGAGE INC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASin thid certain cameSTHROUGH CERTIin the FICATES, SERIES. Court in and 1or 2)04Indian t1 NRo d0 do)er l. by ., wherein C -I11 Asset Manage ant TLC0 BANK, .wA are ), 4,1,ry amgM in W +. special ,,,o ., pursuant a0 Na P l rd Sew ung Agreement dans Ayd) Nay I S 1 PlarnI N antl gamed age nn Ne 5dnegn IR 94L1 ASSOCIATES, LTD., I FI Bmn.0 pann nMp and 1 15 WVER MAL4 LLC, a Dn await I m ted 1 ti Ry M Nv Gert al 0vv C°un win °n Ma Ire N 5 1 ate andr� ng i nInd`an Nye, County. Flor da too wit Xx far sale Una all t° Ne Mone" nddvr 1,r asst on www.IntliamnM.retlfored«Isom, In accordance with section 15.291, Florida SMtue«, the following described real property. situate a g m The leasehold .1'1)d p punuxl to 2004 between M Mall Associates. Ld., a Florida limited pSOnel.Sip:as landlord, end ,Miw pins Mall, LIC, t 0eL aware Ir Ernl..state i N° Land , I,,. 1 in en ...ached Schedule 1 late October r 20, 000. October M, pplemenl limited AACEI wmparry, n ten+1,t, as evidenced let Memorandum of Lued dared Norbe. 30, ROI, as 5, same may b° +mended, restated, reds ad, sat a. 10 da and l2 5110 Lot 7 Lo Ie time. SCHEDULE 1 PARCEL - Fae slim�la +1,d Leneoole A groan of pope( s.9aand in the f the 1b of ecoid, I Towns 33 Sau , Pangg, East, din River County, Honda and being all al Lot ], lot e, Lot 9 and Lal 10, al INDIAN RIVER MALL -THE 01 ., SUBDIVISION, n retodvd in hart BaoY 14, PaOu 69 and 698, of the Public Records al Indian 5«r GUMy, Fbritla. PARCEL I -Fee SimDl and Le«,held gee w an paNw IY Being Lot 1, 3 and parts of Lae1 0 5, 8, a and 10.11g): River O,0 - Na East 82)4 1, a5Subdivision, n ac0rtletl in %" Bogk 1d, Pe d 60A, and more lar d.crtbed is a palm COmmeot . n Ne 5 ,,west wmer of River9)!.) S,1sia2 per Plat Boot 1, Pap° 13, Pubiia Rec0raa of Indian Rrv21 County, ilenda; eM1mce , 4. ro' 0]' 11' Wem a distance of 110.15 Iva. to a gintpd,0. IM1en<ebaannu� NonM1ease writer of l dian Wver Mall -The Easl Peripheral Subdlvisi0n; ,Fence NonM1 89° 51' 18' Wnt ^^anti the N1,nn line al ,aid Indian River Mall - Ne Ean Peripheral Su*id,ion a dist•„: of 550801e1,1a + Nona 1,e South 51.11IL West a'i941 0185.58 /ver [0 •point said point being the Pal gent and plan 0f bepmnbgg f the'*"* " desdp*n: An h • d stance a1619.511M n . oim; Nonce tlue Wvs1 a tlisranu 0f 10861,,1 to 2 g v Nenaa tlue Souldla d'unen00 NonM1—at,11,91! feet'don9 • curve lot7e Iett51]5, done • elm 00 fax a °hamrd cope °aI1foe0 teal andaantral angIe 0138.56'16' a ofCthence)460 IP 00'11'W.rta tlistnce 0186.131,1,ns Bavada:a fol 41.63' /3' to • 0i4v ahe7m N itX 69. 6g 51• Wevl a dinmu of 363.601°1, la • 01h I N,n.2 Na,N )9. 5g 4' W«t • dirtenae 0160.W Tex 9 •paint; Nanw South 19.19' 36' Weat + Nmna 3f 13.91�eo th,""g,estir.]• 86893 len along + he left with a radius tof hence 1 feet and .mord len th 0186.11 lex M1mnp +baring al Nosh I6. 31. 11• WL to + po, thence P l!) thence 308.13) len°+101,/ a w)rve00a Ifl, 1.l wan a !,4192 01295.00 01 W' West • diingth al 252.02 IM to a point ahenm f North. 2.2. ' 30 l 04.0) leap t0 ° pain a North 2678 len 9 a poi ,lthem Sauah IP6 AT 58. Fart to aa distance of 365.15 feel to + mho thence South 66.53' 94' Ent ° din.. leen .0d ,dad I04 4 of 202.921))1 laving 4 Mating 1, NOM f 2 080fe Ext to • point N point said g the paint ° I I6W teat to • glnC them South 15.53' S1' Fan • distance of 8380 fen to +point thence Nann 51.1°' O6' Ear a distance o1I1.St teal w • point Aso bei„ I beginning. Cem.in ,,,,V. 1+uea of 1a2d mon la tau. lar i„fo60.•,onel parpa« only. All rater,"- to acmegge 44 e a g PARCEL 111 -Non E,du2 ve`E+4emvnht Together wieM1 Nose 1,929° +1,d nonexclusive uum.nta wnsti19eing ng",c2 in nal yy0ope(. v«1,d defined .1,d limited by eMn =,nein Intli+^ To Mall Reaproul Easement .1,a op.mingg Agreemene by and .me 9 Billed e A Stores. Inc and Buldlnn. Inc .ntl Evan, P" " .ntl Ca. sad 9. Penney G "P"*. Inc. and IR MIII Aewaates, Ltd., *.Id October ). 199] and ncaded DdaMl 10, 199] in Omdel Record Boot 11)1. P2ge sive E of the otitic Pe<or1131 Indian Wider COunry, amlusds. property. PARCEL N -Nan Erdund Ea.wpnts TNe1Mr wieM1 a*ee rigg 1,d 1,on4xdu+M 1,%1Vn is d°FfZe it Tighe Ldµde' ae d 11:52 ane Itmita by Nat cendn ed°July 3°5119996 eedmecmded July ined996 E° OIIdaI^Ps Covenvn.a, Condili0n, +1,d Remnctaom by 1,d Mvxeen I.0. MtII5Ava0aianea, Ltd, a Fbddr Iamned W nn4ra iD +^ H e Ltie eine, • NonM1 Carolina comarauon, cora BsoN 1111, Papa )Ot, amended 'el* Amendment 01 Declaration of C l Record Book 1262. •gd Restrinion. by e d between ds Mall Anodal County, . Florida.as lunitvd penneraM1lp a* Lowe's Homv [enters, Inc. • NonM1 Gralana LFASEHGlO PEPSONAI PPOPEREV DESCRIF91 EXHIBIT B959 in Official Rewd Boot 1161. Page 1169, *1h of she Public Pods of Indian Riser County, Ona Debtor, Indan River MalL LLC,ha` mons .., grad d bargained, pledged, assigned, Warranted, transferred, conveyed. end granted a security interest BofA, and its successors end cog an and t° the fallowing property rights,in- tenets a Iliend estate, now owns o by 1 e` on Ily G2ined'. °u The leu °d Prem e L L hold a tine he.atid d v: a h1, en Lease dated October 20l Mtw IR Mall Ae p es, Ltd, p• Florida Emit. partnership, landlord, end (Indian River Mall. LLC, ° OeL Tn. 1.. Haid v a m t ee` n heti 12 m °n d steak, li p a 5° e m re gm11N labii •e 0 attached Mem mtl pursuant that d<Oa de 9. IOM . a0ehe r ended, n rrvde,:glee ri9Ms of vhmr 2 h0 l. ° ai %fi ug but not 5mbed to rights ldnnigwemp%laai`Inaio e' ui`a..iyynm mOEina i 1,e °e4'a„ 1,a ngw,rx a m. i ;,..1,e 191'., Hua::. aeypose.maglem. Ir, a a as 11, t ane se. ta Bt . 0. it end e1e dYM, If "la'reriew v ea Inv Lsase o. a suwee,ing term brmx, ga alit *) 2 5 dl Ne 1)21. vela clenm x demand pb salt .. itri°r m law ar intro. o:. °z ,0,'012 .r.;:, Y L in .1,atortenr.d *02 i h 1.s tenant uMer the Lnsb, to Jen under Setu, l,,,l.1112 Ns 1.220, A) 6211 la 50150 0 o! veal the Ln59a02ermam,ed intahe want til of lite Mnbu tang", fa6I o!,1 and 4 aha rei°nion are, 'lint", ea 2) by the Lnea., ra 14 0 in g".,.ion, ar ty a lent,., for Na lns25) pursuant.°) .11, 365 Of Na Brnpu da, development o 1lands and estate. ree401.> NI addNonal lands «labs ed eemmpm.ng dodo M1ereaher acquired by made Me Ile, of Me Instrument;lhemins and IM ewdo (Ina Lsaaed Premises •1,d t1 additional lands and anal Mt of mry.lram time to time, by supplemental mortgage otherwise, be explas.mdl gement, enemaan,, maaifcationA rtpain, 6eplacemlMs and improvamema now or (a) Improvements. au of D pot )5 ark n w Na Mned P Pr d5 a� q� kau s .ad'nm oohs w N, •Imp10 anti l 1,e hereafter erectedsl located ri Ain l ab« use. 0 Pe mi,n n Nat a6 ad W ls.Emr I lie is, a, and passages, sseewe wiOa:he Later, .ter co me IQEa, inter .All eaxeme, Negroes, Senn or usa, rights. s, hpe d g°!1, of leer, ,vent, wry, anon. tunewht ower rignu, water, water cows., water !'gine ate powers, er. lights to the leasee Premiises and tdle Improvements Utl«, inlveat, rviwMyu«. 6MN«. sermud«, tenements, be `diument and agunenanne of any „awl. whal9wr, in amJ wry now or hereafter belonging, rdaunp or PenalnlnY a ems. G1,«. interwn. and the l00.mem 2nd m1,,,)0 2nd d. , 69105102 in Ne bed a any masa. road , atom, opened 3r pnp0ua, b hom of Or ad)0mn9 the Laxed P,S lOd• to NI mob! I2 2 m. oar ryn0.0 3M1a «ta«, n sign,. m eow.6, dente of sentry. D9pem. Dan«can. d+int .1,a ,.mise whmow.e *N .e law end m nary. of Dlpa. a, b I* m me Lava Prtmix« .1,a N. Imww.m.ms .1,a we pial Near. with m..pg. n theMo; 0 g p, wmmuni5iom 21k elovnor fixtured, Nmi[ure. ,aMnn axed in 3r to °porn° 1. Finurn sad Pm352 511.) p, All mIti2ery, a ui L Bxtuna li2duding, 1:,P,,,317::00„).% ut 2w II2).7 b, 211 hereingg, air.2 020.11 plumnn , li Min p.w50e„tc, 2r npunr cry of N. 0Oregdiug ble Sher Drape() )7, Hnd and nature 0 1coeve. owocc by cy ofr, or ie whit Oises hat o.1022 4,0 21, n e L null Oa equipment, mated. and suppliesror a, nature whm0wer owned by 0eW- tNerno, and usable , connection wily the restem or r future appeer 'an d occupancy 01 the Leave Premises and the or appurtenant tend all eredln or with occupancy in which tee ae has 3r shell havemen m interest, now a. hereafter Property.), upas Ne lean Premie°° and the Improvements,os appy cfnthe' Personal Property N. able in mayyl be subject the .)aecur y Mores of operation definedin ets U°I 2'e Lease Remiav and ., Improvements Iwilactthe, the 'Personal 513here any .2d Na right. Nle 4l.and interest 01 Debtor in ern on pe( ducts of the above; n- ilurm Cammerdd Cgdv, n atloged and .named W Ne ,t1e or stns where 229 of IM1, Prape( IY IGund Rhe'llnilorm Gmmarnd Code.). and rll proceeds and gra tl 2 gsre"ory imerOtl in, ar H9M ,o use 3r ocwpy .II or 50) IhlLeas« and Remv An lens, stilet«421, wneue, l.rtings, licenses, wn:tian4 Or ether 2graemenn IwM11M1er wrirten or will gnuant ,a wnicM1 airy Person u grana d Info in wnnedon wily sucM1 I , s b PPoo ably 2..... 2! E"r and the Imo , 2ld weN tlip end a Shu m 2010, t 4d a mita+ v . PO « o iter a v e ler' a 2enuer b n e orragree0..nli sndy or * auxm.e i Ne of any penis +1,d seaman*. 01any wditors , condiaws °1,E :ere y. the toube pe, eon al g observed by eret of pa(.h2)w, essors an or signsMr em Bred into, whether beng, without hour the filing by or 2gaiest �F. Debtor. 1 any eu der for relief under 229 Creditors thehla sees f thecwby, the then L erd ell righte rents. and interest 31 retina, s, successors and assigns Nernst and ,hereunder, Including, mine with): ,, •00 50 «h or .°wave, deposited thereunder a sewn the pe.12210. by Na beset. of their obligationsrCreditors and 9l, nM,additional1,lmhe'0 Mem.) and all and pole (including tale all oil end pas pr She! mineral .anfti« +1,d bonusesl, 0520 or sluing before or after Ne filing py g.0." Oepar of a( petition lar relief under s( GedH9s Wg lam Icollanive proceeds from Me ala or N.r 1.l) . tion a Ne Leans and the light b 5 0 2nd )ply N4. L.. av the P°ymvm °I N, Dep; the d . he proceeds of .n Policia., til Insurance Prouedv. NI Inre2nc5 Proceeds i „nen 1 N4 Luded Premrsas under my Policia, covering the Leased Wamun, including. without limitation, right n receive an pDY 1 Y j909mentx, or venla0.ents mad, i2lieu Nreo1,10) damage to the Progeny y reason o WCOnM0.nav0n Awad, Al, Awnd2, Including imvr„1 Ne,a2, wh,d 017 heretofore .1,d hereafter b° made with reaped ,o )he lased Rwis« h ) 50005.1 1121) whether horn I5, 0,001x° of the right of °0.122)1 do - in 11 1)4129, boo 1,o, limind Io, s(tren2fe, made m beat of 0. in,micip"ian of the «12122 or the ngM1. Gr for a tang. of aide, w loo arty whe, injury to w decnul in the nlue01 1.2,0,4 ar poo° 141T.x 0.tiw.) MI mend., rebnv. w oohed in ire., wish r in a on m 1521.....Pere, ark res.vamems brought ed •pann the Leaved en Pres a a ma t al tae en10,01! o! ° din9t„e interne dI Secured 1115;9914. Tn° right i„ the name 2nd an behalf aI 0,00!, t0 Seen In 1,a defend a( °awn x p 4554 N braa9M wfh respect w IM1. Lumen Premises •„d to commence +1,y anion 0. prom-ming1° p)0uctt Ir adietnts. til P'egro ment+, ertificate, instrument, franchise.. perm., licenses, plans, specifications and ocher document., now or hereafter entered into, 1,neuctetlend uon rights hts therein Premises ma am: wipe ing eor nig the ma. catenation. connr0a 2 man• em per! I Me Leased Premien end aw pan thereof and • 110 rove: nt, ortl.,) bu«erre ar saney on sum2 panne a semP. misem*r, i 2 ,B„ ig.L u. nd 1 .re” of Dvpw eNer^ and thereunder. indunmg without limit°Iioq the right, upon the happening ) if a,de)2 ) 4 ,2, by Olo receive an n le used m s payable with the operation.of Ne lumnold 01)71,0 141vs. All 11.2,2 i. I,ademar40 ...narks, logo, copyrights. goodwill, boob and bcords, and .II other genera Pnrmaea d by Dep.! 0404 nw.n n she 1..«0 51.0.003, m .4!!, nam 6,,000q the 5.x.195 0)10 0)2, [he lock*° Acwun[. •,4 a1 ,moon, «bniahee 0)15639 m N lel 0. 14 6) . r«11 *91 .0 01 antl deped[ 911 4. maims Ir draNuN°u)«, aewnti«, , 225010 1,t 5'opany, 07.221+1 amens, inawmmt .2d eNer p°pxry Odd 15,5 10 0l N. loan AgreSmenl toeethn ,00 all 0*0,62 or are err,alen made to Ne lO Ifl , Account and dl ash, c Bela, Mnb ham Gme t° lime and 1I D6ocnas 031012., O''1010an4‘2')'2,;,'N, dividends 01, aubn*tions In2l141 and Fait' Iq Cww.rsio„. All Py,20 , of the to,*I, 01 , voluntary x th5 1505 of a(a the 4. 09)31 1 *1646.h p). Iamitai3n, Insurance Proteeda and Awards, into ea or fiquitla*n daima; +M lel Miler Wphts. A( and all other rights of 0ebtal in and b the nems en forth in SubsFEE MOPTGAGE REAL PRNERtt DES WPT1031 IXHIWT C PARCEL I- Fee Simple and Leasehold A 70002 of popeM it at ated in the NOM 1R re Sanian 6, Township 33 south, Rahe 39 E.tt Indian Rber County, Flared° and Ming +l of La.I. Lot e. Lot 9 and Lot 10. of INDIAN RNERMALL - THE MALL SUBDIVISION, as record. WEL BIok 1e, Pap« 59 and 590. al NI Puni<Pecarda of Indian Wver C3unry, Florid!. PARCEL A - Fee Simple ntl otsnbold paniw sly BeingLol1,1radpa of 5544)ILab 3,5,9,9and t03100.49Wver Mall -NEast 9041.P5,12is1,41«.102din,212 5lto Paget 71and MA,.n1)mora la described1022,ws: point aid 9e COm5endng at Ne $Omhw.n wmer 21 Rivera EstOn 111 S6 iv012 p0 Na2 Boo) J Page 12, Pudic Pecogdl of Indian Wver County. flari,a; Nance South I Peripheral OY IT Wut a Nna22e of 110.00 len 10 a point, thence continue 1)19.k n wmer 0f Indian Rive! 11 -The E.sl Pedphenl 99 521.0 Nance NwN ag 5g 15' West a10ay the 121 line of .2k .9122 River 29.11-,0 Ee”011Suhdm4i3n • di4Mnce of 6m.w len l0 r 'NJongaidNorth line20)64°10'001,1,21)1116,20185.59 fenb,point todeinsb)10thepmapel0004,sad°,1,1l0Mgin0i )ftheallowing! 10,04rt ga carve to right having Teems tlue 0 )0,1 v N1v20 31 6,9.5115 to . h5 n; Neem due 0 a 4 41• of 1096 feel [o 1 gam; 91u due south r aihanm 0115121 1111 E4 2 ghat N2)ce Non , )o th, 555]8 feet a.1, the hwin di- ol"10.00 feet ." a timid "gig' 56.1 + p.i21; thnce NOnh 1)•00' 0t' Wesl +distance 0019' 11 09 • poi„. 1291,6 Nanhwes) 0 M.9N iM bong a curve 9 Ne Ie2 *vino a ,0.2 .16080 feet and a 00 2 1+ogle hl ear"51'"43"*" et e; Ma a "Tec them North Bg 5g L' Wen • divan: of 02,0) lex to r point: Nenu North,. 15 W5 • 9)12' of 6080 nn to h nce N Nen: s3' S 19° 19' 36' Wel a d270.ce feet 0.o.9d leer ,0 e pint Nance 800 I„1, •lane 2 "re' the left with •radius of 329.21 len and a lord 13,010 feet to 1 lee[ then a bearing of Nanh I6. 31' I*, Wace to • point;9thence North ; thence n 5/' West 20 along of curve t feet 1 • palm; IM12) ' N)2M1 1)• a1 w• West a "di* o126282 (til h. °game thence North a din+nce .of E. to a 0 t, a pence thence 26.78 feet 00' point Ean a nie Sou of 161801,1, Io 2 point; ahenm N61311en rbng 2 lir tS Ne IeR vnnh a ndlus al 165 ee feet.rke• dwdlpNthofnceS tat9.5.3 bEasta iarMl 230'0feEan t0agineN Nanh 106.)B lE595 x05thence 41el feet to pc66'Ern°05I3 being to2gent lir SouN 66. 63'Sd'Eea.divtanee 01.580 feel n •gine Nance South 15.63 61' East • diatnu 01203.00 ten to • point ,Fanta North 61.10' O6' Eut • diannae 0111.61 Mnb • gint said point also Ming NO palm 01 beginning. Containing 11.0114 acres of land more or less. All relent 9 to .usage o0 square Wage are for informational pu,g.., en°. PARCEL III - Non Exdueive Easement. d de0nvd ark limieed MI certain Indian River Man Recipacal Etswenl +1,d O9cr Aglamam by end 2maN Oilllyd Dman- T)0p5 St tr.«h Ina`nd 291E^d 41 • d Sets °00.16 k end C0.1 1,E Jg51 P.0)211png(, wane bty t bf g a r ,3 pity, Inc rrd Ira° Avwcae, be, tl75ed O136x ). 199) ark rec0tled OnOher 10, 199] In Gad R0 25 Boot 15]0. Page 2915, °f 129 .7.0- N °l d 11 lis W x <a 1,N, .rtTo. _ Tg.h,lrz,V Exd ' . Ea 1 1 vel ,t^ ve 7.1 41, , 1 C C nditio 1,d Ran 9h r nM1 Iha YM1 °d nn x lu.ry 99 .red dein d a d aim ed by thn N las . s Tp end between ecl Mall Ao,Ocloven. L d, • Conditions a Il andl gnvrship sad d b e'2 en L CMall A Inc.. I Nonn C loll„° climited partd"e0 July` owe. and recorded July ]. 1996 in Ghana Pcorp Book 111J Psge M,, •mended by e dment of Declaration 01 Cwenann, LoMitiona mtl ROnnnionl lel 1,d bxween LR Mall Associates. Led. •Florid. limited partnership 1,d Lowe's Nome Camera, Inc. •Nanh Carolina corporation. sited Jnu+ry 11, 1999 and dad Mart 1;1999 in Omcia Record Book 1291, 2,112A% °g 369 b9h o the Pubbc o"' on"'" River -ow. Florid•. FEE ., tt'2PERSONAIPRWERTy OESCW7,°.ot IXNIBRO y old,2trIttglgt4eva,10:21Sa,dSerl "=.LOn :°;. neeoan y'i'Ynia^ctr,:tiroo Pa(.Wdle2172o,t,°;212-22,,%2T= nkN aTrvs Dvhf r, I? Mall A« d Ir01E L'd�o101aritll IiNmn.ed Dtomr`hapial MoHo panlnc. M a mavnors g DrOPe( sip , imeresu aaW ratan° .ee lar, a rvpinare <r1 1 erica mer pa a �[ammeru nue r ap arra ad gra car n in hu ' reed or hereahx mew .d by Ninon ' now Lnd. The real proper, described in Schedule 1 and attached hereto and need° I pan hereof Ithe'Lendik Ibl Addniaul Lank. All eddna,al land, estates and development right, hereafter enquired by Debtor for use in wmnnion v.. MaLand end Me development a f N, Lana and all additional lana, and ,stem therein whim may, from time to Oma by supplemental mortgage 3r ot,eawin, be expressly made subject to Me lien 0f this Sn*ty Insvumene; i nynruv,a,z.4. Tne ,,alts, mumu!«, fixture, additions, en,agemam, extension°, modifications, repairs, replacements and improvement now or hereafter erected w located whin er above Me Land r* that are owned * 0. 10! en. A0* lhe'Imprwnmemi l: pe n porn of alleys, passages, sewer rights, water, water tours«, water rights the pawn., ab lights and devHo men, dgM., and all estates. I rights)... Euementin All easement, a Lwry 0r me, riene vtri and land, ...len wan, all w 0 pertaining to the Land and the Iha ,u and the ng Me, title, iab.0,0 ppnnk,+Nn1 .0 I. 0 0 09 ,, l4, , ,0 0l .m,, lered,0ma0M )5e ...len.. l) any nature whe),oweg in.r( way o 1,x«1,,) bdaNmg, ,.,d .0y ppvv intlen, ern Ind len g i4 Mh. hed 9 arty 1,.5. ata °r 7,7,2:4 opened ar Prapond, is Rona al a. odIn,9 ehe LIrM, ,0 or t2rer tine Nenaf Una all or esm«, noes, ,Uesn*van,'0" 0) *web, nghs p1) 64 ,5100 n, as pa sad remand wlrtgoArta *N n boo end b)u(, eOepur al, m Ina t0 eM Lnd +1,d Ne Imprevemen0 end eve11 eAynd pard NmaL wiN.lne npurtnne Nerta: p fall Equipment ),d I•hw 07 0, )/ 2, pacts that i+ dented an Made 9 0l the Uniform Commercial cola Iha .24 ,1 0,0,1 0 , 0 awned 3r heroher .e, 0 ,0 by Oepoc wbd IE sin° Fxn*e ¢meed 5 o<eµe°;nd 971500.11 veai Lna 54 eb4nea Nene^ °r Nmun R) 5)10 0) *t 10, 9.1)14) 7.04:11'.71.17i a, aB 0) WlA .) pp1,n 0 bm09)1)5 sad:„ ,84511750 pncening 1,E eNer oma nm,mm. now 0w , by substitmion. t d replau0.)ds of spy p1 the fwegx9G, log"her wily 211 .°Lease, exc wto the ate Dna, Debtor Ma and e . right r inter. ntend therein or entered Nema Ic1,lkaively. Ne 'Equlpme '1. NanwiWtnding Na 12repoiny Ea 1,l tel, not Indusia a0 preps) belonging n Bavawer anent Ue Lease, except m ths.nme . Debtor Mall love a.0) 0r interen,hxean; 1 Ne Pro seemed fiwns 0r real pe( under IXs Ifl finane Ail Eqyuipment now armed, 301he awn 'tr: of wait Ix ",nether 2ceuired, by Oep9 ,'V Ia vo 6daled n Ne L+2d dd Tor:, nta .sham, pan o pp(N1. is Ivw 31 she peniwlar .rete in which the E3uipmntyt loubd, gincluding. with3m Ilmieveion, ell handing Or conmuni0n mveenb4 Intended foo eonatrvwan, reconnrvnion, .leennan a. leyryair 3f ar Inabltiion 01, Ne Fo e(, mnnrvc N. Lrn4,Indu4ing.lbm`2ot 02911ed 10, einginea,ulowicn fo the om: nr°oot p mon, .n°i'IpV'T,, all nrd conn., rvsbma`fire enin°44599ungranv ntl ,*100lvntm, pheadn °` 2)4.1N,nincliner000,' e1.',7 V°m`cunS 9 sad ". coaling , y 1,d rys[ems, pas and alai c act. z p e :sand eg9DmenL p011upon °noel armyy nt ctlixhwnMr, reg tanto" toe ranges, cr,ni3n 1 wuiPmenl and thelititi of til Mnfla, cad wa +1 in easements, • aw sanitry sewer Ianhties, uwliry line, tad equipment Iran, wens.: ns. nei sup1ty°o,1.747,7.;114',7.'4, o d, n owned loingy the extent 0115) 3 , •02111 Nera21 ,„d 0l other utilities 0, • , 4 ,16 s) 3 )01, in easement, a1 water tank, water 42 11ry ,r gown Hies, fuel 1 04,3 lu.l nrd, Mel supply, efd ell Shu ix..«,`1. eNer wily dl .!) p,, . property which tens adtli,ie en .,pato- ma, 7 ,2,, 141,4 suMi,9ion+lar a( o(Nv D2A)4!ing • d Ne proceed, thxentl Ic011acavely, N 'Flnurei 6 Notwnntundiag Ne loregoing.'filure+' M1Ifl ,a, mites. any grope( who=h t<npmats are entitled to me tat Nv nM that Debt 0 atoll h rights.n 1,e, franchise, lice certificatesend! hereafter Ind all a iM I9IPerabel 00 •1) MI furl °q'1 ishiag bulla of r m+ediin a yl °olu° u'Plie, ol the Uteorrn Commercialeneral i'Code,1°whether tangible or ntrgible`oN°r than Fixtures, licenses, ed by Y n e( of 229 Hnd or t ra a abo lined a woe” Neprovisions her with all wens.. eplac d btu • x M1er ' ar Nerelo tl Ne p9cvatlthereat c II °' e. Na 'Personal R° Y Oeba` :1,e wit M1 a I ,ev, .Nan ` and to 0 the Land Perm. s . nImprovements, 1'g 0' ! erest iaa defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. ) adopted and enacted W the tato 0r mates where any of d hen M.ga .Mi 01 Debtorin ,1d about the f h Pen IPdperry Mitch ayb°nbjenr° ndu711 pro'= r1 .1 .50l Ne ve `n Property of De 1,eUni( m C m iti: Cod 'e, 0r i len 1,e li INT 6 b Ih Le. 1,E Pen ° 412. Lea 'w",1,h baba. A r Ne 011 g � 'spei t �7enOr 1 e""" nlloany ,'lin .nae , LLS.G .,), p. as the eY by I ended M10 ms Ivl_. � ngbliq: � del e0tleledpbte.de and in of Oe`N0, M w .ntl ae in . Nar - . d thea non, data 'tboaibm am n p , ed N Eer hale lir paint d °n ILXm 1 ` eehe Til°GTN by0m u @Mar o "" P* .dN'umir' o y othd ":7,7.2"%:'27,1°27°.°,0277:2122t.'„ NeM1 ecil.1Ci.La.1,'d'Nlm ymim +1)05140* ubn' 4Oalt hate, 2 veinal un Away s. All 0 te. which yh.ehed1N 1,i ^I and ail ,th to nom nu al the ilehi of wane: omtm Ii ivako a ii a m, . haler made m lieu of h a hereafterM m with rem. ae= ` Property. nih(vai0. IxiFa P v 1,v Irl 11201,4 were,. of o Ne ghajhw 1m aesge r of 1N9Fnvleny IYIPrOlO a N°g(�Ii1dud ng w nous lin theO. a end appa'hMaproceeds I a Pala kid 9m n, or mole 11mant ma.. ink. thereof lin° Pro a Gnalry m the Property; IMTaay 4 All r lun'dc rebate with 'duc n In TaeeS tM1 gaagainst the Proper..`9 111 [ kg 71." .All p°ueds of In naonvaeni nNVAUnM ialumary, °f any of N.rlongin9.indudiN. atli Ilmira* 9!lmunwnce Pr°cerds ndrtfren ., into tree °rO'liquidat;an dainty boa„0 to protect Weimer. al Secured aa( in Intl R19M1t. Th. NUL i7 Nts nam° and on 521 0 0. 1294, n De tl defend 2)0M1lcoon G�pmaNate certificates, 002p with „°pax n N° P9p..rliry 2nd , plmmenw my anion w post Ow o! ROpsrty' Int115rswem4. T° 0. scent owned 17 Ds1010.41I ,meet 000.i41rvm 255nts, 1)2fran0llh,15!m,4cnns 59) 10, specifications 2nd 0501. documents, nhereafter159) ' 1,d all dpllt Nerein tl her«0, Pe<ling P2) 152) the use, gcu,114 co6al m mtnagemm, ii °pxa[ian of Ne Ltnd and .(pan 9 ,l, and anyy ngw4d.l l0 °r my 0 ince o! tniviry wnduned on Ne land and any gM1 Nerwfa 1,d all nBM, tills 1,d Innrnt of Debar Herein and Nxeunan,10b'dunin0. wnh391imaratioty Na npM1t upon Ne M1aPpeninp of a(deltule hereuMa6, b naive ma wlect a( soma pryana 10 Dep- Nereunde0, sI,.Ao.Mb125.00.B9110.2*0)2Deppina*toN01,5lamlFMiJ 00000) al09ugh 121+boa. Said ale all M made patent to ,1,d in order to °aids e. turns of Baia final Judgment of Foredwu.e. A( peeaon 14)00. a0 interest in NO surplus from aha ale, it a(. oNx than IM praPeny owner a4 0l Ne date of Ne Ba pendens mut file a dai08 44 2 60 den 02261 sale. Dried tnly 4th day al February, NIA Rasp* 5120 ubmi"e) Id Dein D. 24,0 ,.11 Deane D. DeB-Po.he, ..en. Flaride Ba NO.: 0FORM Primary 0 S. O nge Avenue, 6)42,00, 91 02 ahTeleph Telephone: 401440 Mbhed A. Nardella, Eaa FlOnea Bar Na.: 61365 Primary Emlil: mnrrtldl.Bbumrom secondary Emag: ahul<hinwn9*rt.<om BURR A FORMAN LLP 3w S. Orange Avenue, 6u.s 800 Orlando, FL 338]1 TdepAanx 10)516 6600 Famimile: 10]51..6601 ATTOPNE.12 FOR PLAINTIFF •pate p, you are ,milled, n no coat to N91m ” Per.u,t with .,:W0,11I Nyou 1,e a person with a 90'9 ol4 oo nndv tar cto11n in order to l l,d p. b uedin 703,122)0 p)Wsi.% of cenein Ple"e 17.11, Corse Janwn, ADA Gardlna9r, 150 NW CounVy CIub irve, Satin }I], Pon SL Latae, R 34986, gel M]1T10 al Ivat ] ,rys halon your adeduled wan 2ppe+nnca, ar immeennry upon reaivinp Nb 2.:,2:t1: H lila lime les lwv N. s1heduled sop + is Ina than) dry, 11 you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711. Path: Marsh I, 9.2015 TCN16)9110 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST ,►j�`"'� NEWSPAPERS Indian River Press Journal C}�- 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 IPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Sherri Cipriani, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Pub Number Date Copyline PO # INDIAN RIVER CO PLANNING 2680917 3/9/2015 PUBLIC HEARING EXPANSION OF BUILDIN — -h Swor L d subscribed Before me this day of, March 09, 2015, by Sherri Cipriani [X] personally known to me or [ ]who has produced as identification. , who is Sandra Coldren , .m*, SANDRA COLDREN • MY COMMISSION # FF 004035 ,a EXPIRES: April 1, 2017 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Notary Public NEWSPAPER E -Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES ORIGINAL NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION NORGE OF SALE 39012 010,1,1 Nears AIL CLAIMS NOT 0,,k 10)1• P. FILED WITHIN THE 2227, Public R«ort TIME PERIODS SET of Indian 90., Cou. FORTH IN SECTION ty, Florian, ane , 133.)03 OF THE enWeals Declar,h,,U FLORIDA PROBATE ,M •'Declaration" Foam. (04,1,.,, No EVER BAME0. 3002835.000) NOTWITHSTANDING Any nerpason clalmin TXE TIME PERI005 e r F 1M.0 SET FORTH ABOVE, pin nom thio ula ANY CLAIM FILED any. other than is TWO MDEOREDEA1 FYTBARD5 TOBE 1:17.7714.1: faanidntenwa imust fa 1eIv ne x , Th0101408 pANITLS BARRED. E,oe. eeya •n.rith ozI,hia nonce The Inreaeidn eel d p2rree1015. ill be made a a 812,. Snfinewn Jadoo0 40.94.0064 Fan 319 ington oil Coo n No. pendCA.in th Lexington 5C 20072 now pending. in th a/1wH cwt In to Klbprmn%ar Portend Ronaarer CauntS Tylm G.P:t. Esq. OATErt this 11 th as E4Aail Address: of Febtuery•2015. Dun5N.aw.orp N 'da Bar, NaJEFFREY SMNI 0111713 0.1000004 15551Mi,n River CIRCUIT COUR INDIAN RIVE COUNTY•FLOR10. MICHAEL N. HUTTE Florida Bar No 6 0]3 BAKEA B HOSTET Pon Office Box 11 Orlando, Florid Tell., esti Ib Tel pe Atom 120715011110 Request for m moda02lfl by br Pm Pat wMoux ilei wowith a er5,bdb o n.eae env ar germemti9n to ceedin poroutooto aro proceeding. Y2 prow oteUi res t n "fat' "n agoes PAlaeures, 30 Suie217. Port SI /1`0154376 Bd4 FL 5°555. °566, T2 )-1310 •t lead'. .ova before you peva..w°nanr8 Uery pot receiving ia notbfe lto rn.111M11 2,a /Iyvoice hint 15, Indian River County Planning Depa... Advertiser: Ad Number: z U c ID Section-Page-Zone(s) : NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA c O Q U 01) 0 Insertion Number: Monday, March 09, 2015 12 • SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS • MONDAY, MARCH 9, 2015 • IR TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED NOUSE OF ACTION on the Plaintiffs et res Y or immediate 0i...rd,1.4B Other - w , dehup wip M fo. •2, elvnt u ply2,nFitorDMlaMSebuarY t or M Cs1heytsm By: /s/ AtOA50th Requests for Accom- modations by Per- sons with Oisabpllieilryi- ra7s wean at nice O a :eon p,.9 a,ya4o [hi, =rot," d, provil tool srtdn Plea„ lemee`Ccurt Admie iffiration, 250 NW Country Drive, Suits 31 ). Pon St. Lucie,15 31506, et 801-13]0 ,t lent .rye before tour heduled ro pp-- parame, o Wined* ,Hoop or Nn 1°`°` ilrhe ernebefore h, eel ed ppear- an. leu than ] NOTICE NOTICE OF ACTION days:ityou eehear- p or voice m. 173' '5 1112015 01*227°5M IN THE CIRCLET 'COURT OF 040 NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRC. IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CNK A CION SE NO. 31 2014.001269 DIVISION: WELLS FARGO BANK NA Plaintiff, PAUL FORD AIKIA L oP.eU5. 1000.nA NOTICE OF 0CTON T0: PAUL 1090 0010 PAUL EF000 LASKNOWN AU- 0RET 55:15564 CA - NAM. LANE DELRAY BEACH, FL 331163180 CURRENT ADDRESS: UNKNOWN THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE GF PAUL FORD ARIA PAUL E. (.5507 KNOWN 00. NAB...15561 10. NABRIA LANE NONE Ths SL John. Rive Wetar M•napemenl d.tri.t IOi.t,nlti d receip- OI ane following Ineiviau.i Can.nmp- ve U. Perms (LUPI permit ,pplic,- 4on1.1: Premier Citrus LLC, Consumptive Use Per application 63233-6. By letter m2edrow 4'tp. p...pl.e ,.1270. for olr� The withdrawals u.94 by Ahi. ptp2,ed projen 2211 o f quifer Wa 3 Irom .0 Upper floredm Aquifer viz 1active.4 wells in Indian 0,10 co.42.ty4 22 d b Sedi7m: 10 .nil 3. Minnp: 33 5, Ranges 3) E, Imawn .a Indian ...et S. Premier Cptrua LLC, Consumptive Use Permit apPlicallon 61113-9. 01 letter o:da r'ow <;ap..:.rtpl.69m.eidiw lar ciw.. wim 2,a stance The wiNw4ri,lwl amla 2,uwora ,r1y t upnre69.ed %0Upper flondan Aquifervia vial emus in Indian Rr Count. io- . Rargei3l E,e7dr a, ST=.D 5, The filetil containing the permit apdice- Monlel a available for inspection ndry through Friday, except fu Dls- n holiday., 0 .m. to 5 p.m.,,at the t,a F. 1. 22 V u Rere 56. .lm fiee,0 einetr4te District'sesemw centers, but you u ehouImcmAetore th, Ne flee a ate vcidc wic, cert e4 ,e;2,e k2,, oon02lforma' tori d,.w•tn.eemrrhme.mi.nrce,.a, I. Additionally. mast permit applica- tion ,1e 1docu document* can m/pviewed wi/l non fneea`ht0L Te brain ipmrms.iw how to finand view permit aspics- a"te documents, Wenadda,water- .permnngeyhtml d 691ect the topic of choice from the 'Find pen d fin• 411 04, 8.90/,,99 2,d On nefdlm4 the dire<tioh prwis!ed Re - der 'How to fed • 0001.9 20 01, 6e port (MR/ Or other epdiwtiin lila doe The District issue.two type. d individu- alnsu ptive permit (CUPs) staRJesuee CUP. "(where the proposed Romprve use doe• nate <. e 800 9911ona prw day on an nage Issued CUPrjwhet Me 00nlpno°aeaaog: pumptive use exceeds 600,000 gallons er day on an wmaga annual buffs « 2,v District receives . timely substantial objection) Oed, objection). an ,- OVillbe"magesal,etIstirret Burl ice center when. the ar dicauon is pro- s d, unless the epplication Is ',02808 t an 4p liunon for • Pw- p.ar,100,1n10.4/9891 CUP 9s e plagued below, in which went the Gwernin Board will consider the a ylicnion°BABA. noticed Baa. mee[inp The Govern 15Y Beard n«mdly meat an the se.and Tuesdry d Na monN. A substantial objection [ • p Iiution far a star-iueed Individual CUP must ee eb in sur enc and filed 40 0 g- euWad 0.M1. Director,1. 0u 0,u of q 9, .lata4Y Suyyyy P.O. Bax ,1109, pp14. on 321)bte11 « by email t ^pgiceaiYoYnautipn ufiution of Ne ,plpl'I- t1on.ation Indud. ,,0,r me Permit Application Number a the Pwje of Name in. nth. abjection. Heti 6.11.2 of the 509169/190 l9 .Ither the lift* 400 affix 1h dere o the ..leen no- the. person,4 int8. U.S. mol (for se persons p e notice by U.S. mill. Ne/lo l se pew Nal nwho is emailed Nor mase pee son who receive actual n ill Mamthenmiaioh- Isna t me ed by p Im moor n I provided e b U.S.l ail u em ,1' A'substantial Dine E mine Iii vin hhat identifies .h. 2nlenole concern, ydralopu or nvira men I impacu of he pmp'ped consumptive uael and r ,10 Ilc,ble rule r r 8. 9 NmdY a 11,, (0 oblenion x111 uuse eePcchu,i `n 1« a ,,n.,sued end's n CUP by c sid eyed p licetion for a n Inyy Boe.d- la,ued Individual [UP. N me Di re elY aubnanti,l obl�°tion Com yweman roan wil2,w a notice 1 the Oitril intended noee decision on me permit application 1',;114:'40 449 9.1 n 0.4 1wt1.44 1« .1 mg . 40 1,uvd 1.1,1duN CUP win M 9da NY Lha Dlndnds 1100 0901' 91.. No, it Intended Dindn Dsrl- havwi5 be weeded a.raao• who e .equated m.I "91,69.o 6 9 m .Are e,1 tr 41.102, wl Noce 21 Intended 0o a°p, 2n'td.1.oetl°Pan•104.1 CUP Burtlabb1.G ,4,d 44yu11,. 0ireclai, e the Notiu lIl, U'R Dalin 0.9.142 i9 9911919194. Fw mo,e spar you °vied t 4010 me oinlari'wtNlneu east d 2,a nc.mn al the tencnion it epu hove sn.. obaesnone, ora 2,:a r in su o,liw regarding the rapAe� cansumptive she r quell Na Delrio for edpermitinlplicado n repardinp a ,20149 permit OlOIAaeO n 5019 wi5 be prwi0. an opvprwnlryry ,bum me 9ilade mitten affection 1 , 42 nm. m2, niee ,womb oblenion ripe, 'e TS7:::e adm eZiLivihearl g: FIor6 Margaret Daniels. Bureau Chief Bureau of R1Cutory Sunp SL John, River Water Management Die yid 4049 Reid Street Palate.. FL 32177-2529 letN54'4570 b: nA ' 3015 TCN311086 NOncE DF ACTION DELRAY BEACH. FL 334463180 CURRENT ADDRESS: UNKNOWN ANY AND ALL UN- KNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, 00005201901 Efl AND AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED (9. 0051111L OEFEN- NOT KNOWN WN TO BE NOT KNOWN LI B, DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SND UN- KNOWN PARTIES MAY CLAIM AN Is TSPERESTAS OOSE5, HEIRS, 003. EES, GMNT- EES, OR OTHER LAST KNOWN AD. DRESS:UNKNOWN CURRENT ADDRESS: 055NOV/N 0012 ARE NOTIFIED roreeow a 00nq,ye V anhree 1.11,01,° RIVER Ceu" FIprNL 4: LOT F BLOCK 18, VERA LAKE ATE ACCORD FR 1051x98100AGE 05 OF INDIA1/N RIVER 0.9 been filed ay lint qdh<OieulrVaredtj` nel Vwtw Ian dayvifithe firs PuRon/MioWw cociala, P.L. * ,. a utg 0rney. �add 19aa 0 Memod w Y. bona SOK Tim Florist 33531, nilfOe ori00., afore e s thei<aon Plaintiff. alffirwy immediately e vd.e ahedn,45wohM em 1 . lief de You ha rebel demand In the Complier or ppnnnl[a 2,. P111 re Yi cea the,f0 un p2, mi e1 M,rrA, 111 ClerkBy. NI Andrea of i Aa 0.Dut Clxk lqdvilar 4"47. eone with re • per- ulwy0um,pv- whhh , dubil c. o neetl, any ,c dem p0d,42 t - paniciwte in hie 1.5.z e t You ,.ovules of 1 vain ee8010,. certain conte C0 Admin .,limn, 250 NW Count Club Drive, 5405.21), Pon St. Cuda FL 111:1112; O)-13]0 t .ore tf°:: your brained rqun pp attnu, n receiving this0t. .00on idea li< r• before ..e h doled yy - .la•Y• if`you aro aM1hlrl) 09/1,4.,48111. Pub: 2. A0,16, TLNIB8115 9010E The Se Jahns DMA Diem of me 1o04w NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT W AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CML DMSON 0: ]1 -Mt r105E. rv/NvR NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PAR. TICIPATE IN THIS PRO1EEDING 1,02 ARE 1500110, AT NO COST TO YOU 0137 CEO THERTAIN P9021AS22014 - SISTANCE. PLEASJOHNSOE CONTACT COACO- ORDIN94 ADA CO- ORDINATOR, COUNTRY 350 NW COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE PO90 ST. LUCK ]1088 »31 03)0 A LEI 0 A Judgment F,ao- iloa.ra 04, of 204 ,nuary 14 1016, in the above•captione action. the Clerk our, hip t and Mx blb der.ledinrierlreal av BCrw'ee :ib C e R. day of 00co 1om0 AM lallowinp d.acri Pnpe:la OF Judgment I Fora `17:.:15l10 0 0to55: T to, SILVEI D5 1000101 HE PLA VPIAL THEREOF, AS CORDED IN P COUNTY, FLORIDA O�6C6YY d drAew EAUH,AFOL O ]1963, AnyinP=n' d1 emsu° din from tel rile. if y. other then the he d "I'h° Iia eeetlenwl° fib 160day. ,IterOat lhe sale. Subm`l"e� JUSTIN 0PPAUL, Florida 8.061101 6 TIMOTHY 0. PADGETT, PA 0207 Old Water 0.4 Rd., SI,.23 302 T,II,M258)/2]-2512 1850da hovel 1.-2567 e'ti PP1leP•, own ;tang CIA«NSiWIT H DISABILITIES ACT. 5 YOU AREA PERSON WHO A 0105 ANY WHO NEEDS ANY NOTICE..... BABA ar. Water Management " adoneir i apvlic I.y o Bea h, Inc.. PO V FL cti e 2,r I, A5ec,ion: 39 E onea2 Y1Fu� 09Ba04 x 650 pwdon al din India 1, Township: 33 and includes 2701 ntal Peaou.ce P for known nt syeh,rconnrocy6o84d CM geme, peusa C neral Hone. The filets) containing the permit @optica - 00y,1,1 areavailablef« inewcfan Mon 801/4.0."0 mr.dle•fi 0. 1. Ida DSDin Ict • lie dqu,nera, 4049 Reid 51., 11,0.6, FL 31117.2539. Vou mw .I.0 w 0l„ at one of14, District's Set. lee /4,049.'5:;, ye"eevenld `tall mei. . tb the 12, . specific Are Center. Aadiloheelye m perm application file documents ot 1 e I. .n lonenew.ter.c9Mpermittin9fndenhun The md42 42 a 122,, win be Wade v[ the M c14p os`wa'ce C where be on is n Is processed lie Ne application is ovedj brby the .•co Gwernin^ sea Bawl)1« III the °5°5°°°°5 le mm eenialb Vou are advised ,,91;10 the 01,01,1 within 14 awe je Ni, s, comments, ermatio bl.'d/19 , co Information regarding the 1145 g g activity ed inthepoermi, n lnce tot Pleuie... pro- posed r r i 8 2,69 w Buie... Chief Burr u olal ppus tory N11y . 060y.e m4.66 at •p llsetioneup• Fa4 1r7re,:P 11 ,,estiinn4ee gime. a Permit Apyl201 01 umber . ane 089911Nam4 N You eke , wrinen re queer o me Dismn ler additiend iry t.m.non rs..Ny p•dfic ppliiumn. vet well be i4miae.oerim ehe formation Isble Mt dime. Aol4nau met fling a wdrten h.pOo teadoes not watla fou t a CMpler r Florida eta u e . ,dmininrativ. hearing. Nalice o4 0i,trin 0.01.192 or Intended 01.1110 0,coehav will be provided to who have r 9ue.td efvidu- Irotice. A .1 Decision in20 141 d C.A.of Decision ,, 60 1 n iT Intended No- tice4/0 Deddan n. apua. 04' mon ba ,,08118 M me 6:1,11 op - rut Chid, o the of Repdatry Stp- 10 the date such Na[Icv la pno.rer,d� Margaret Daniels, Bureau Chief Bureau of Regulatory Suyp SL Jahn, River Wafer Management De P°'°C,id Street FL 331))-2529 11613294570 Pub: March TCN31012°' 1015 RE- IT6 RANGE 15 L1 ARE HEARING OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 711. Pub: March 0 9.2015 T.267B277 09701111050 COURT LIF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL 0RCUIT WAND FOR IN0MN RIVER COUIm, FLORIDAP1 CIWLACTION CASE NO.: 31 -2014 -CA -210062 DIVISION: NAT10N5TA1 MORT. GAGE 111. 40.10;51 NEFF GENE DEE , el D%vnaamlLL NONCE M 'CEOTICEIS HE SALE HEREBY 5Ju"dgm7nr9e 9go Fo se: ape No 3' °Cion o13h 5150019578 JI 0rwn In and NDMN RIVED 0< DEE: MINIUM A5.0 10 the The Cor. and4.vt .he bluur ndLben orcash Amin. enaleer.reelfo rl e0:00A M, o ing described lee bI1ow- Lrptlercribad 0114p' 't Fi0gmans UNIT 6320,, 6, BUIL. 1, RIVER LONOOMIUNIUM. COUNTY, FLORIDA. OGETHE9 WITH ANY AND ALL ANO ANY UN01- VIOED INTEREST IN THE COMMON ELE• MENTS OR APPUR- T THERETO.NNCE5 EA 034/A 6306 5 RIVER RUN DRIVE, 5ABAS TIR. AM FL 36968 erinYiMe;:rid Ise sundaiminp Pu, from the sales I Cor man the owneras of the eae of the Lia Pendens must 51e a !aim within 11 ears alter the Ronald R Wolfe& Associates, Pt P.O. Box 15018 Temps. 18131 251-4766 BFlyonde Na5. da Bar No. NOTICE NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE to)3s1 FIM01N0il• 9•pueataler Peron, 691/h Div,, bilrl va Ifyou are bi0yy 0Mt ..dine ^ de,lon p wnidpp. In M1ia Prntiuotill no new ou r io you, to the ereunion of Plwvie Islnetn'I on, 250 NW snug au oDrrt: )43]]]0 tie g5i days before your scheduled court e.. wnanca « - et ilYnotification i/ the time before .M1e acheduled appear- . la Iwo ,M1.n T Ii nes dYou iceim- wme1esuont. 2015 5 00, 0032980192 W.1 CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CML ACTION CASE NO.: 31.301..-000784 OMSION: NATIONSTAR MORT- GAGE LLC. Plaintiff. DENNIS FRA P'5 AIKIA DENN1S E. FFRAPFFIIER. el A Nonce OF FORECLOSURE SALE NOTICE (5EREo Y i 1L"Pn 940,4 .5 °90..0/0. r 9 ed Fab,Oary K n ca..4o3015,end.0.,.4 11.101. CarA-000784 N,ETEETH C,9N0l,he h. Court 1 2 the NIJudl- J ICir1 In andRCl0. NDIAN wiPNEoun- DENNIS MAPPIER A/KIA DENNIS E. FRAPPIER' BRENDA A. FRAPPIER A/0/A BRENDA E 900005 FRAPPIER A/K/A 99190* ALICE 5 AIKIA FMPPIE5, X005150 00(10(1. FLORIOA FINANCE TION:10 The Clerk of the Cowl will sal t he highest and ben bidder for ugh n 1 ldien-river.ree : ElOse.com a5 3/]Y1015,Ah.d follow- ing described Prop. len In LOTe't19. L0 Ymere 05 BLOCK 352, SEBASTIAN (HI 112 LANDS UNIT 10 P1410HEERR TO THE PLAT TEOF RE CORDED N PLAT 9AT THE PUAGE 351. TME PUBLIC 1E - CORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, MA942 BROOK 1001 . EDGE TERRACE, 5E. BASTIAN, FL L 3 34M Any, perm utnl cllaiming e y, a froma esl`"il other than he thepdai: of the LW Pendens must file a claim shot i y Oar it "'Ronald PWole Aeeodxes, P.L P.O. Box 4018 Tames• Florida 1611-4018 11131 3514766 Nene Kwek onda Bar No. 17367 F13013052 NOS Requests for Patona"wete OsaY NOTICE NORCE OF FORECLOSURE bin;i ,. 11 ar. a (210020/,, n ed. alry „ o delivlpeion re trims prn`N`a r. you m` entitl entitled, et Provi�lon f certain assistance. Ple,aa 1m,npcou2 Adnue ceherry Club °Drrv: Suite 317, Port St. d4 F4 31916.1; d e3b lonre pre isce.rsheduled coon nuim , <. MAX p- eill- mlilnattwtian it Oe time before n the de r• leu th. s I' You Ica Im- aiee,nrl)11. Pub: Mar<M1 9, I6, 2015 T[N361]B9 NOTICE OF AOMINIST2UITION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROBATE00 DIVISION Case No.: 313015CP000160 W RE:ESTATE OF BRUCE...TYRE Oeu.sed TO NTICE ET The adminis,ra,Ion of he anata of Bruce who.e date 01 desth }.U, Nibvp ndbe0 9/6 Coun /« Indian River , 0110, Honda, eM1e DM - sl n, the adds 1 of which '1'.1.10.0•7110e 2.4,,`va0e eocn cL 3402. Th. al the d oddlpersonal rev...I.- al re«dsentaatii`es' mey senses forth below. Allc.aant . e a 2,ei,oreL Nv a..r M1,vin spina er demand° ,Orion de69Fom 2201 0l this 2OU,, la qudlrvd by amen fila IMir d,im suint Ni, won WITHIN THE LATER OF 3 MONTHS AFTER THE TIME OF THE FIRST PUBUCN TION OF 081530DAYN0. TICS OF, S ArielTHE OATS OF S SERVIRVICENO A COPY OF THIS NOTICE ON All oftdhe4 creditor. al he decedent end other persons Mving claims or demands against decedent's ffitate must film their dais ilIbis won WITHIN 3 MONTHS AFTER THE OATS 0. THE FIRST SUCA- TION OF THIS NO- rics 11 ALL NOT TFILED0 WITHIN THE IME PERIOOfi SET FORTH I2 0101 ORIDA 1 ) 0 THE ORIDA PROBATE CODE WILL FOR- EVER OR EVER BARRED. 60TWITHSTANDING 1X0 TIME PERI005 5ET FORTH ABOVE, ANY CLAIM FILED TAN. YEARS 0R MOq 09099 THE DECEDENT'S OATS OF DEATH 15 BARRED. The date of first puMi- `n f Nie notice is March 1,115 Personal Reyyre Bmu E Mactlnryre 3013 Nnat Drive Vera BnN, F3ardltla Attorney for Personal RReq bd Es. • Flndeyn Number Rob4tlwd NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE ThLe is notice of a hearing ofte Board of County Commissioners tow.. speciala option use .p rwal for an ex an ion n Arnim.1Inaom e`buloi ell or Fait expansion aptist Church loc ed at A69 Mm snort in anion 1, Townan"' ]3, Range 38. RIe,e. "e me anaNad liudon map. A public hetin1 n which penia, in inter. and 8uzens AA have Commiunitytob hear0 win be held the Board of County ssi:Ch d 14i,n River5F. larid,sCounry Comminian Ch,mb r. t me Counryry Amid o nen Buildin , I ed a 1001 11Th GOe.t Vmu 0u<li. FwriL, an Tu9aJei. A9ardi 19. MI5 ,t 9.02 ,m Please alien phnni -slated question, ,o the current devil; m dentin, dace es t )]b2161139. Al tlocummts w , p 1:°14:.75.7601 able 4wued rte o fee in N. Indian Wvn mumY Plmnin Diw- SeI n.lau„d x 801 hh Svv within building,'A o M1 Founm mi v2, Co dee. oDv< +y be vd w m hma efFM re invite ito t d Mimna hoe in the members of 1M ublic ere intim t mend end s in N public M1 p p ninwte' a w Ic 2,r b9 ;nine who may wia to appeal any decision, which May be wide will n. d to a venafm record of IM npeilwnisenaape' '1, ensure Inn v an""n" ANYONE WHO NEE05 A SPECIA1 ACCOMM00ATION 1100 THI5 MEETING MUST CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH u15A81LITIES ACT 00/ 000001300OR AT 22661223 AT LEAST H000513 400 CE OFTHE MEETING NOUN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY t Wesley S. Davis, Maim. To bmmrtsed March .2316 T.2 8091) NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION Associates. PA 5089 Highway A10. Suite 100 Vero Beech FL 33963 Phony 772-2)65500 Fee 772-3365505 Email: IlladOrlloYdlew. Secondary E-M,it peralegalerlloydlew. Pub: March 3.9.2015 TCN167M14 W THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROBATE OM111, 5 l M11CP02t32 Division COLEMAN AIK/A WILLIAM NI. COLE- 800Deceased. NO0CE The TOCREOROR n of tee gest a al leieee°eeathhw.e 5,0ember 20, 2011. 'e wit 1° inrdie Car - Ne ,ddrne 0 wni6A Vera, ° 0,.,Syn91 3186. Tee n• , and addressee of the enmL11ii e.enta- 1 pmsonalsar...me,ro:. do- ey bil,n h low. Tha 0,4., /000f 1"tl .,..,b, inld D.cembe�f6. uIcreditors or the ecent and othe. AFTER THE TIME OF THE FIRST PUBLICA- TION OF THIS NO TICE OR 30 DAYS AFTER THE DAIS OSF FTHIS NOTICE ON THEM UI «hes credit) . of the decedent and clother poseds having aim.edemanda .grt.I ltd.nra fi:v ,heir WITHIwnh mgs mon WITHIN 1 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF THE FM51 PUBLICA- TION OF 1815 N0- Ths value of ,he ea- ppltne'teN eddrese.00 th a ee ....the ,the per on .°trcete hes Doenle Jack.,,, 18 Court Bridton kd n, L.xingto4 SC 2,d, Suite 6,2560 -60 B76one: 1 339 -7661918 h Mahn1, 015 TCN2971679567 NOTICE OF SALE W THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL 020041, IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO 312014.020011 PALM FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., RAW...don. Plaintiff. CHARLES A. 120145 JR, ET AL Defendant. None A SALE TOJOHN BROMAN COLLEEN BROMAN 1357 NINE MILE PONT RD. FAIRPORT• NY 12256 8794 eniila i. hereby piw M1e2015 e e10:00 0 1M. by electroni< sale, Clerk wll offerl d ,le the Iollewing deeuibed ref] Pies :Hoerinv ierswrdescco m5`COUNT151 W AGAINST DEFER. DANT, 00HNOLLEE1891 MAN, CN BROMAN An undivided .61180 interest inDisney Unit 1150 Club let VeroeHe.IcH, . leasehold condo. domin um.I.eaccord- an of recorded thereof ., 4.cO..e TCN16 There's MUSK in Classified Advertising! Find anything from pianos be percussion. Seautifyyeur home. ChechoutTreasure coast affistilea Looking for your next best friend?