The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1/16/2001 i "s` , v. u&h". .., _y ., e s ., .:: . ... � ✓.:..c4 �., .. .^ .. .s . �* "`u''s ek: .._ . . '�: # 'A xf is :v a �': 2 >.« �.: ,. -�*. -. .� .'".: r r SP' rm+w� 'r�F . x .. . 3 .. . ... �.: ,..,. ...Y. n. �.. h b4 1 .. n . c f ✓ . 2 .. ,:.Ya ^t iu .y.+' +. 4Y Y Qu iV $,.? _ „s,.. , .. . � x; rcro#. « f�rx.. ... . r s R'., e. �. . # r«. �r . aa.;. fi � ,.. .3 .a',`"_ ., .. i.>. . _�. , -. ^;. t .Y.a .'.s ... ,; � v ,� . . Y .,?: u � . .� .. .s r ,. ?.,n.t 'r �, ✓{. ,... {1•'s. . _ .. ,a .,e.., . . . „ , �.. . .. .., .., x . . . .:.. '@ ,,. .. .'ffi ,. . . . d . : . t� X sar �. -. . >. x . . , ;vE . .. ,+'z-. , , - -:,{r x. .. ':'� ,.. t # 4 .: _.:r' :, .. .. . s .. . ,. .. „..s .- < . v ;%sv .. �•.. `" � .i'.-... _ .: . . . • 5. ... - . . . ... ,. a . . .. ,,, i^ s r. :',.0 ,+. . ., x d._ ..S . .. .. _. � .. .. , � ,, /..: _ ._ . .. . ., . ,. # . v � , xx:,� 'e' - ati { +. .r.. ,,. .. ,fY w, x ,w x^.. . . .t. x. ., . . -,Y . .;, ai ,h i3 S , - , r ,. .. r i �^ a rt ... F .• . ..;.'? y... .ts a �;„. �.a. �.•. �� u_sw+7•, f ,c ;.,»,• £ A�a:.St... e.2,. .. . sv r.. . .r ., > ,��rg,�. -. 1. _#: .. . rsT ,.T}"., x r ,., _ .. . .. ,x..- ,, .. r 1 z.- x&. e, . 'a_e . ..., ."T >.„ . 3 .1i _ . . .,..fi » .-,: �'if . .. z Fps- .. .,„. -e 4 s . _ # ;:, r s .,:ary a . �#..- .# [ t T :.x,: . f , :t "Y?si' a . . c R � q..x3 •,, . - ..r }`.. . t x .. , x'. . f .eUi, .- .s.„. -t + . .. d }z�;.._ , fie . '. =;, £ . . . . z�. :F•: z. "."r, e v. . ,. t'� .t�".a ;.,. - xx . Y S' f-q. �. �r .: S' � «�.. .. � •., ; - , . • .a ; v .., .: . . .r• ^rv: 5 Y' .. x�, . ,�;. � < '. '. .r r x, e ,. ^}, b x' uJx j5y )y.” frn <„ , 's. -s t 2 � ' t_ { 'Ya:f. ..qT , r .. .,,,. . . :'3 �i.5,•.. . , . . . .fi 4 < r'. - r`•. .,< , u .. , . s3 3 a. ...c:, x .. + . ,s , . :. .lk { �.:.:•s r^ 1 - `k -�. .. ,A �. . , £�r . �r x . . ,. �k�y}� �' �•, .s�,; - . � . -._;',: €kza. ?r,� . : ,., �. .. � ,. :� , - {. a.y-:� ' w r° `ar '�f�'" `* ` cu. . s�* �: + r 9f� a,„ , , +��i, Y'�v :.,..,n .. , ,. ,,.�..a.. .. .,z ,. x ., r . u , , ��` :�,., ,. .> �" .,s <� "£. �r . ., t.. ..,� > .;'�'°a"`s � a. . ' .a�� tl` c�w.,�� `.,�, .. .'��: : x��T'� . ,� r ,s A. �2 ��i,'rxta.r xtrp`'�;"'�'` .d E • e en *. .in.... . v`is 4• ' MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS " INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA F . A G E N D A TUESDAY JANUARY6 2 1 001 - 9 : 00 A. M . County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 184025h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman District 5 , Ruth M . Stanbridge , Vice Chairman District 2 James E . Chandler, County Administrator Fran B . Adams District 1 Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney Kenneth R . Macht District 3 Kimberly Massung , Executive Aide to BCC +: John W . Tippin District 4 Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk to the Board 9 : 00 a . m . 1 . CALL TO ORDER BACKUP PAGES 2 . INVOCATION 3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm . John W . Tippin 4 . ADDITIONS /DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 1 • Item 13 . A . , Report on Visit to G . Pierce Wood Hospital . 5 . PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES None 7. CONSENT AGENDA A . Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated January 4 , 2001 ) 1 - 9 B . Retirement of Gail Kemp from Indian River County 10 iii fi s c) PG 7 0 7 fi -777 7 If If If If , Iff . _ a v q „n , .:p, ,,g...., . .. 'A"u .$�.` ..� '^�'�. r °§d ..:5 -�<, " a�' 44 >,•.�. r�,xA � , %a " � zt µ, ., i ^.s : x. xa '�n �� i #''w rs'`' v' y r #'"`. a� ` : , ¢,;. .. � . „ - .. , � ... :- '" ��++.. ..., ,x u`' ,.��,�'.�. . 'y<• "}^; y'rv,^Y._�tt .,. a ..,;uY , . .r ;kF'r. i1 ; h c "a;,k . 4 ;x..: .. � de, r ., ;�':i- . l � �� ^� >_ �:. .,. ..; •, . . ;� , e %; as �`?_�_ ^` . ^s'•_S ` », - .tea �. w r`a�r w ar ' �.,-�,� ,,„,ta Yra*: 3 �,,fi',• . �- .> .2 ^*- ,,, . � ;, " � ,. u,:a a.: ,`;C: , "b�, k. .. �• �t`�,>k?;x�'% :8,h,..,, �+,y�# '^x.�, ,+ .w"` .r�' i^�r... - 'ee. .r . , ', r�` ' °� �� ,'�.;�' °"z•,.".• '�.; te. -"�h . roy. . & � ,, .a, � z ^� . z BACKUP 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont ' d. ) PAGES C . Settlement of Ward v . Indian River County ( memorandum dated January 9 , 2001 ) 11 D . Settlement of Coogan v . Indian River County ( memorandum dated January 9 , 2 00 1 ) 12 E . Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 008 ( memorandum dated January 10 , 2001 ) 13 - 16 F . Out- of- County Travel for Comm . Stanbridge to attend the Historic Preservation Day 2001 in Tallahassee , FL on March 21 -22 , 2001 17 - 18 G . Oak Chase Development LLC , Request for Final Plat Approval for Oak Chase Phase II (memorandum dated January 8 , 2001 ) 19 - 31 y : eY : 8 . CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Sheriff Roy Raymond : A) Request to donate $ 500 from Forfeiture Fund to partnership with A Child Is Missing ( letter dated January 8 , 2001 ) 32 B ) Request to donate $ 5 , 836 . 89 each to Substance Abuse Council and Children ' s Home Society from Forfeiture Fund ( letter dated January 8 , 2001 ) 33 9 . PUBLIC ITEMS A . PUBLIC HEARINGS None Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS Atlas Development Corp Appeal of a Planning and Zoning Commission Decision to Deny Site Plan Approval for a 7 Unit Residential Development Quasi -Judicial (memorandum dated January 10 , 2001 ) 34 - 72 P 708 '+. r , .'» � ". _ }. sfi s + � ie# >^:• P x � ry:�e°C s "" ' e'= g i� e ,t_s . ' ` ;� fi� � cr ":,y.. . S` '•': 9 xr � t . .x � S k- ;i;'x '�, t ,%':-. .t< _ s,T `"t a.�a � .. « Y,• .,u, .^. 2Tr' . k :, � �:. � 4� , w„ y4 «?..1> >k .� ... .e- a -z'e i t ,., . y } :� . wS; c n,ri` .. ?,;u'$ '” -v. . � $^? _..�:. e� r b Vie: n:., ;. e i. v °} `'_' ... . . ,ax t� �r . 3, e ro,. _ ;, .l ,va. ,. ,.':� . §# . .. -ro . }� Sw+ ��+ xk,°i�..M ..a # , v 5�` w: - � ea' Y .x .. • ;a'. §'�-$ -. .S ;Y.3, t --3 , r^s a .<o ~: oV,i r . . + �x , . x s '�>yS. >. � � ;-,. .. ., v r S� „ ;x,.:jr? -... Y.tf« .._ x ''".,a , .. .;' xr a .. . ^:.� <," . .t z„ 52 � L� ; �e Jda �'`: :::- y �i i �c. (fi k`~ ✓„ t:. '? ":�� a= v:g *�.. . �� . ,. .. ' 'r Vie :.«x.+ aa�.,:r. . ,., '.i >��.> .,.v t "b` . :.: :G ++ s'�.� k. � F ,t Ax ,R.: .� r ; '.: "s'r' 3 d +�, a.. +SA+ aro<. . , S, - s r . �''� ' a.�4`;. r s Y* ” x ,y..-try •�' f2/ V x y } ,,,cavi .: e : «tom,,•,.; ,, +�, P .�?, P' G a - ... ""`; � _, ., , .:1 a£ . ux s. z.; .. x. L y �.. ;=`+a�. 'y -'`�.' '� d '# � �, ` ,n` 3 � c f:. x�. . u. ,.,, - � 3 ” y :f h ,*>< `§ z3,. 4 > r" r ,•-4:. .M' k:..*'{ "'7 3:. °,..r c9 ,-- k $ al:•e� c ""t 1+ : -'.� r...` .er. ...``u -Y off; 3,s z tsr .` P wt x s :�'$4,.-,�' � � -� xf ,.+a z.,. a, a ' u .:�i t S d x k ,x .. ✓ '' a _ ,s ,:` r � t5 ' v d` a a „�:`4` r R sa 3 '3 _. , `g<"a..� �” .^3. . . -. i ,� r?• +d �-s u°' &3 � . �,.z'x8 � g , ✓.°, 's" ? .r rex �+na u§ 'e-- zz .§. . � M- , " ' 4d� > i",+�? ` gar« i :C .S .ra'" 'r, BACKUP 9 , PUBLIC ITEMS (cont ' d . ) : PAGES Co PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 1 . Public Hearing Scheduled for January 23 , 2001 : Forest Lake Petition Water Service — Resolution III (memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 ) 73 2 . Public Hearing Scheduled for January 23 , 2001 : Frank Baratta ' s request to rezone ± 32 . 36 acres located near the southeast comer of SR60 and 74 `h Avenue from A - 1 , Agricultural District ( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) , to RM - 8 , Multiple-Family Resi - dential District (up to 8 units/acre) (Quasi-Judicial) ( memorandum dated January 8 , 2001 ) 74 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S MATTERS Humane Society (memorandum dated January 10 , 2001 ) 75 - 84 11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development None Be Emergency Services None Co General Services None D . Leisure Services None E . Office of Management and Budget None Fe Personnel None G . Public Works None He Utilities 1 , Overhead Crane Modification and Installation (memorandum dated January 8 , 2001 ) 85 - 100 2 , 28 `h Avenue (north of 4th St) Petition Water Service Resolution IV — Final Assessment ( memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 101 - 113 , y �°n R"r � " .> s "�l" c . e� S• .,� sd,»s,� -, „,? ,� dx a,3 ''- `^ � e 'x . s: a , If ' ff14 eI s- .,, x , BACKUP 11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS ( cont ' d . ) • PAGES I . Human Services None 12 . COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Be Vice Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Co Commissioner Fran Be Adams D . Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Recent article in Press Journal concerning Transfer Stations (deferred from meeting of January 9 , 2001 ) 114- 115 f E . Commissioner John W. Tippin 14 . SPECIAL DISTRICTSIBOARDS A. Emergency Services District None Be Solid Waste Disposal District 1 . Approval of Minutes — meeting of Nov . 14 , 2000 2 . Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District Engineering Services for Monitoring Wells , Staff Gauges and Water Stage Monitor ( memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 ) 116 - 136 Bpi 16 PG 710 ff a 2 SR ` vx S rt . BACK ( J) 14 , SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS ( confd ) • PAGES Be Solid Waste Disposal District 3 . Preparation of the 1999 - 2000 Solid Waste Disposal District Biennial Water Quality Report (memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 ) 137 - 146 C . Environmental Control Board None 15 . ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based . Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County ' s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567 - 8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting . Indian River County WebSite : http : //bccl . co . indian-river . fl . us Full agenda back- up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, Indian River County Main Library , IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1 : 00 p. m . until Friday morning and Saturday 12 : 00 noon until 5 : 00 p. m . PG 7 1 f ,. y _ h T i...... 1 ' A INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JANUARY 16 , 2001 1 . CALL TO ORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 - 2 . INVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 - 3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 - 4 . ADDITIONS /CHANGES TO THE AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 2 - 5 . PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS - 2 - 6 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7 . CONSENT AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 2 - 7 . A . List of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 2 - 7 . B . Proclamation Honoring Gail F . Kemp on her Retirement . . . . . . . . . . . . - 9 - 7 . C . Lawsuits - Settlement of Ward v . Indian River County . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 1 - 7 . D . Lawsuits - Settlement of Coogan v . Indian River County . . . . I . . . . . . - 12 - 7 . E . Miscellaneous Budget Amendment # 008 - 13 - JANUARY 16 , 2001 J� PG 712 - 1 - 71 7 . F . Out - of- County Travel - Vice Chairman Stanbridge to Attend Historic Preservation Day 2001 in Tallahassee , FL on March 21 - 22 , 2001 - 16 - 7 . G . Oak Chase Development LLC - Final Plat Approval for Oak Chase Phase II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 17 - 8 . A . SHERIFF ROY RAYMOND - REQUEST TO DONATE $ 500 FROM FORFEITURE FUND TO PARTNERSHIP WITH "A CHILD IS MISSING " PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 19 - 8 . 13 . SHERIFF ROY RAYMOND - REQUEST TO DONATE $ 5 , 836 . 89 EACH TO SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL AND CHILDREN ' S HOME SOCIETY FROM FORFEITURE FUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 21 - 9 . 13 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - ATLAS DEVELOPMENT CORP . ( BOSTON HOMES /ORCHID DUNES ) - APPEAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 7 - UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ( Quasi - Judicial ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 22 - 9 - C . PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 23 , 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -40 - 1 ) FOREST LAKE PETITION WATER SERVICE - RESOLUTION III . . . - 40 - 2 ) FRANK BARATTA - REQUEST TO REZONE ± 32 . 36 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SR- 60 AND 74 " " AVENUE FROM A - I TO RM- 8 ( Quasi -Judicial ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 - JANUARYBX6 , 12061 IDG 7 13 - 2 - r>: h 10 . HUMANE SOCIETY - DISCUSSION REGARDING CONTAMINATION OF OLD SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL SITE AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR LIFT STATION AND ERUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 43 - 11 . H . 1 . HOBART NORTH AND SOUTH COUNTY REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANTS - OVERHEAD CRANE MODIFICATION AND INSTALLATION - J . HERBERT CORP . - CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE . . . . . 1 . . 1 . . . . 1 . . . . . . 1 . . . . 1 . 1 . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 49 - I 1 , H . 20 49 -11 . H . 2 . RESOLUTION 2001 - 007 - 28TH AVENUE (NORTH OF 4TH STREET ) PETITION WATER SERVICE - RESOLUTION IV - FINAL ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 51 - 13 . A . CHAIRMAN CAROLINE D . GINN - REPORT ON VISIT TO G . PIERCE WOOD HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 58 - 13 . D . COMMISSIONER KENNETH R . MRCHT - PRESS JOURNAL ARTICLE CONCERNING CLOSURE OF TRANSFER STATIONS - 62 - 14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 011 . . . . . . - 63 - 14 . 13 . SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT I . . . I . . . . 0 . . . . . 0 . . . I . . . . . . . . . . 63 - 14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 63 - JANUARY 16 , 2001 SK116PG714 - 3 - January 16 , 2001 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers , 1840 25 " Street , Vero Beach , Florida, on Tuesday , January 16 , 2001 , at 9 : 00 a . m . Present were Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman ; Ruth M . Stanbridge , Vice Chairman ; Kenneth R . Macht , John W . Tippin ; and Fran B . Adams . Also present were James E . Chandler, County Administrator ; Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney ; and Patricia "PJ " Jones , Deputy Clerk . 1 . CALL TO ORDER Chairman Ginn called the meeting to order . 2 . INVOCATION Commissioner Tippin delivered the Invocation . 3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK 1 1 6 $ b ' S - 1 - 4 . ADDITIONS/CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Chairman Ginn requested the addition of Item 13 . A . , Report on Visit to G . Pierce Wood Hospital . ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the Board unanimously added the above items to the Agenda . 5 . PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None . 6 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES None . 7 . CONSENT AGENDA 7. A . LIST OF WARRANTS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 4 , 2001 : JANUARY 16 , 2001 i 6 PG 7 16 TO : HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE : JANUARY 4 , 2001 SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR , FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136 . 06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes . Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of December 28 , 2000 to January 4 , 2001 . ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge , SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued by the Clerk to the Board for December 28 , 2000 through January 4 , 2001 , as recommended by staff. CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020943 UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER CTY 2000 - 12 - 28 2 , 219 . 78 0020944 THE GUARDIAN 2000 - 12 - 28 18 , 940 . 47 0020945 KRUCZKIEWICZ , LORIANE 2001 - 01 - 03 138 . 50 0020946 BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR 2001 - 01 - 03 115 . 38 0020947 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 03 400 . 00 0020948 IRS - ACS 2001 - 01 - 03 50 . 00 0020949 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 2001 - 01 - 03 664 . 73 0020950 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC , 2001 - 01 - 03 21540 . 00 0020951 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 2001 - 01 - 03 79 , 724 . 26 0020952 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 2001 - 01 - 03 213 . 83 0020953 NACO / SOUTHEAST 2001 - 01 - 03 8 , 831 . 34 0020954 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 03 571 . 19 0020955 WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS 2001 - 01 - 03 23 . 08 0020956 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE 2001 - 01 - 03 132 . 46 0020957 FL SDU 2001 - 01 - 03 7 , 480 . 60 0259411 TROYER , JAKI 1999 - 03 - 18 . 00 VOID 0259429 DRNDAK , JOHN & JANINE 1999 - 03 - 18 . 00 VOID 0259430 CANDIDO , ALBERTO & ELEANOR 1999 - 03 - 18 . 00 VOID 0259436 REMAX CONNECTION 1999 - 03 - 18 . 00 VOID 0259448 TIRICO , JEFFREY D 1999 - 03 - 18 . 00 VOID 0259450 MCKAMEY , KIMBERLY 1999 - 03 - 18 . 00 VOID 0260015 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1999 - 03 - 31 . 00 VOID 0260040 HOLLAND , BOBBY 1999 - 03 - 31 . 00 VOID JANUARY 16 , 2001 16 PG 7 17 - 3 - r s§ CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0260044 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1999 - 03 - 31 ` 0 VOID C260048 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 1999 - 03 - 31 . 00 VOID 0260051 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1999 - 03 - 31 . 00 VOID 0260172 PICARDI , DOMENICO 1999 - 03 - 31 . 00 VOID 0260183 HORIZONS - SEBASTIAN 1999 - 03 - 31 . 00 VOID 0260184 DE PIANO , RONALD 1999 - 03 - 31 0260523 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 1999 - 04 - 08 00 VOID. 00 VOID m 0260524 PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION 1999 - 04 - 08 . 00 VOID 0260898 QUINTERO , ANGELA T 1999 - 04 - 15 . 00 VOID 0260904 PRENTISS , NOCHOLE 1999 - 04 - 15 . 00 VOID 0260923 YADDOW , GEORGETTE 1999 - 04 - 15 . 00 VOID 0261711 CRAWFORD , DENNIS & GLORIA 1999 - 04 - 29 . 00 VOID 0261763 KOPA IMPORTS INC } 1999 - 04 - 29 . 00 VOID 0261771 MASSONI , SANDRA 1999 - 04 - 29 . 00 VOID 0261782 PALMER , W 1999 - 04 - 29 . 00 VOID 0261918 FT PIERCE , CITY OF 1999 - 05 - 06 . 00 VOID 0262154 PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION 1999 - 05 - 06 . 00 VOID 0262177 DI BARTOLO , LUCZLLE & ANTHONY 1999 - 05 - 06 . 00 VOID 0262580 DODGE , DAMON 1999 - 05 - 13 . 00 VOID 0262684 FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST 1999 - 05 - 20 . 00 VOID 0262693 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW 1999 - 05 - 20 . 00 VOID 0262941 GARNER , SYLVIA BERRY 1999 - 05 - 20 . 00 VOID 0262948 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 1999 - 05 - 20 . 00 VOID u 0262949 ATKINS , C CLYDE 1999 - 05 - 20 . 00 VOID 0262961 FRIERSON , WALKER H 1999 - 05 - 20 . 00 VOID 0262973 MILLER , BETTE 1999 - 05 - 20 . 00 VOID 0263248 HALL , TOM 1999 - 05 - 27 . 00 VOID 0263462 MC CANN , MARK 1999 - 05 - 27 . 00 VOID 0266800 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1999 - 07 - 29 . 00 VOID 0269638 INSURANCE SERVICING & 1999 - 09 - 23 . 00 VOID 0273950 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 1999 - 12 - 09 . 00 VOID 0288535 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2000 - 08 - 31 . 00 VOID 0292083 GREENBERG , GERALD 2000 - 11 - 02 . 00 VOID 0292281 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID 0292422 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID 0292507 PATTERSON , PAT 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID 0292562 UNIVERSAL LAND TITLE INC 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID 0292599 WILLIAMSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID 0292639 CARLEY , MORRIS G . 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID 0292957 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2000 - 11 - 16 . 00 VOID 0293356 LFI VERO BEACH , INC 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID 0293511 TREASURE COAST SAFETY COUNCIL 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID m 0293551 WATSON , LOUISE E 2000 - 11 - 30 00 VOIDo 0293873 KANE , MARLENE ANN 2000 - 12 - 07 . 00 VOID 0293919 NATIONAL WEATHER ASSOCIATION 2000 - 12 - 07 . 00 VOID 0294560 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT CO . , INC 2000 - 12 - 21 . 00 VOID 0295116 LESCO , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 . 00 VOID 0295189 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2001 - 01 - 04 506 . 50 0295190 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 04 179 . 65 f 0295191 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 2001 - 01 - 04 815 . 48 r 0295192 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 2001 - 01 - 04 485 . 00 0295193 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 653 . 35 ; 0295194 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH , 2001 - 01 - 04 753 . 43 ' i 0295195 ATLANTIC REPORTING 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 052 . 30 0295196 ABS PUMPS , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 21466 . 00 0295197 ASSOCIATION OF STATE 2001 - 01 - 04 46 . 00 0295198 ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 140 . 00 0295199 A T & T 2001 - 01 - 04 67 . 71 0295200 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE 2001 - 01 - 04 95 , 894 . 17 0295201 AMERICAN REPORTING 2001 - 01 - 04 119 . 00 0295202 A T & T 2001 - 01 - 04 19 . 39 0295203 APOLLO ENTERPRISES 2001 - 01 - 04 270 . 57 ' JANUARY 16dOg1i 6 PG 7 18 -4 - m CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT xs� ti . :� 2U4 APA - FLORIDA CHAPTER 2001 - 01 - 04 195 . 00 C29 . 205 ANCOR CORF INC . 2001 - 01 - 04 572 . 40 02 : 5206 AMERITREND HOMES 2001 - 01 - 04 11000 . 00 0295207 ABC PRINTING CO 2001 - 01 - 04 653 . 98 0295208 ALL CLEAR LOCATING SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 04 177 . 3C 0295209 AVATECH SOLUTIONS INC 2001 - 01 - 04 6 , 000 . 00 0295210 ARCHITECTURAL DIGEST 2001 - 01 - 04 24 . 00 0295211 BARTH CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 04 13 . 4C 0295212 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 01 - 04 243 . 00 0295213 BAY STREET PHARMACY 2001 - 01 - 04 24 . 48 0295214 BLACK BOX CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 04 31337 . 90 0295215 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 635 . 70 0295216 BRODART CO 2001 - 01 - 04 5 , 048 . 22 0295217 BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC 2001 - 01 - 04 27 . 55 G ± 0295218 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2001 - 01 - 04 488 . 30 0295219 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 2001 - 01 - 04 363 . 41 0295220 BEAZER HOMES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 000 . 00 ` 0295221 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2001 - 01 - 04 333 . 24 0295222 BMG 2001 - 01 - 04 67 . 16 0295223 BUSHNELL CORP 2001 - 01 - 04 126 . 64 0295224 BLESSINGS BY ANNE 2001 - 01 - 04 682 . 66 0295225 BUDGET AUTO GLASS 2001 - 01 - 04 214 . 95 0295226 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF IRC 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 831 . 89 0295227 BELLSOUTH 2001 - 01 - 04 295 . 12 0295228 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC 2001 - 01 - 04 3 , 063 . 28 0295229 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 2001 - 01 - 04 17 , 378 . 85 0295230 CLINIC PHARMACY 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 080 . 63 w 0295231 COMPUTER SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY 2001 - 01 - 04 250 . 00 0295232 CHASTAIN , JAMES 2001 - 01 - 04 26 . 68 0295233 CUSTOM CARRIAGES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 79 . 66 0295234 CALL ONE , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 25 . 00 w 0295235 COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES 2001 - 01 - 04 17 , 419 . 44 0295236 CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO 2001 - 01 - 04 69 . 37 a 0295237 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT 2001 - 01 - 04 48 . 75 0295238 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2001 - 01 - 04 484 . 50 0295239 COLUMBIA HOUSE 2001 - 01 - 04 21 . 57 0295240 COOGAN , MAUREEN AND 2001 - 01 - 04 20 , 000 . 00 0295241 CHAPMAN , JOHN 2001 - 01 - 04 45 . 00 0295242 COMPLETE ELECTRIC 2001 - 01 - 04 30 . 00 0295243 COLORTRAC , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 2 , 640 . 00 0295244 CAMERON , NANCY 2001 - 01 - 04 833 . 45 0295245 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2001 - 01 - 04 187 . 64 0295246 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 2001 - 01 - 04 71 . 47 0295247 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 01 - 04 21337 . 74 0295248 DON SMITH ' S PAINT STORE , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 661 . 45 0295249 DATA SUPPLIES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 182 . 79 0295250 DAVIDSON TITLES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 13 , 698 . 51 0295251 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2001 - 01 - 04 225 . 00 0295252 DIETZ , PARK & ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 71485 . 00 0295253 DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE 2001 - 01 - 04 625 . 00 0295254 DIROCCO CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 04 500 . 00 0295255 DADE PAPER COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 04 643 . 21 0295256 DAVIS , BRENDA 2001 - 01 - 04 18 . 56 0295257 DIRECTEC 2001 - 01 - 04 479 . 20 0295258 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2001 - 01 - 04 95 . 65 0295259 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 01 - 04 120 . 00 0295260 DAUGHERTY , JOYCE 2001 - 01 - 04 24 . 95 0295261 DUBUC , TERRY 2001 - 01 - 04 300 . 00 0295262 EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES 2001 - 01 - 04 98 . 00 } 0295263 ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 04 603 . 00 0295264 FEDEX 2001 - 01 - 04 157 . 08 0295265 FLORIDA BAR , THE 2001 - 01 - 04 190 . 00 JANUARY 16 , 2001 8KI16PG719 A, �q CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0295266 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 04 11935 . 98 0295267 BEVERAGE LAW 2001 - 01 - 04 891 . 00 0295268 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC 2001 - 01 - 04 228 . 74 0295269 FLOYD MD , IRA 2001 - 01 - 04 400 . 00 0295270 FACTS ON FILE INC 2001 - 01 - 04 187 . 79 0295271 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2001 - 01 - 04 181 . 61 0295272 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 04 713 . 60. 0295273 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC 2001 - 01 - 04 24 . 00 0295274 FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 10 , 564 . 14 0295275 FUCHS , SUSAN 2001 - 01 - 04 24 . 00 0295276 GALE GROUP , THE 2001 - 01 - 04 377 . 95 0295277 GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 347 . 26 0295278 GRAY SUPPLY COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 04 83 . 20 0295279 GEIGER SOUTH FLORIDA 2001 - 01 - 04 941 . 12 0295280 GONZALEZ , PATRICK MD 2001 - 01 - 04 93 . 60 0295281 GENTIVA HEALTH SVC - VERO 2001 - 01 - 04 256 . 50 0295282 GANIO , CARL DPM 2001 - 01 - 04 41 . 40 0295283 HELD , PATRICIA BARGO 2001 - 01 - 04 126 . 00 0295284 HACH COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 04 390 . 50 0295285 HUD USER 2001 - 01 - 04 10 . 00 0295286 HARTSFIELD , CELESTE L 2001 - 01 - 04 91 . 00 0295287 HEALTHSOUTH TREASURE COAST 2001 - 01 - 04 272 . 70 0295288 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 01 - 04 11500 . 00 0295289 HARRIS , GREGORY PHD CVE 2001 - 01 - 04 380 . 25 0295290 HOWELL SHOOTING SUPPLIES INC 2001 - 01 - 04 28 , 668 . 00 0295291 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 361 . 40 0295292 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2001 - 01 - 04 169 . 47 0295293 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 757 . 09 0295294 INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER 2001 - 01 - 04 2 , 191 . 50 0295295 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2001 - 01 - 04 10 , 735 . 26 0295296 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 04 180 . 28 0295297 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2001 - 01 - 04 200 . 44 0295298 INDIAN RIVER ALL - FAB , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 243 . 02 0295299 ISADORA FASHIONS , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 189 . 00 0295300 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY 2001 - 01 - 04 6 , 675 . 20 0295301 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF ' S 2001 - 01 - 04 25 . 00 0295302 INDIAN RIVER HAND 2001 - 01 - 04 736 . 20 0295303 JACKSON ELECTRONICS 2001 - 01 - 04 2 . 60 0295304 JUDGE , JAMES A II 2001 - 01 - 04 75 . 70 0295305 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001 - 01 - 04 882 . 13 0295306 JONES & JONES 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 000 ' 00 0295307 JUDAH , HUSTON 2001 - 01 - 04 54 . 08 0295308 JLT INSURANCE SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 04 550 . 00 0295309 JONES CHEMICALS , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 595 . 00 0295310 KIMLEY - HORN & ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 7 , 200 . 00 0295311 KINSHIP 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 052 . 42 0295312 KURTZ , ERIC C MD 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 200 . 00 0295313 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING 2001 - 01 - 04 150 . 00 0295314 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2001 - 01 - 04 11900 . 00 0295315 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC . 2001 - 01 - 04 746 . 20 0295316 LESCO , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 294 . 26 0295317 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 298 . 45 0295318 LARGE PRINT LIBRARY DISCOUNTER 2001 - 01 - 04 66 . 51 0295319 LUNA , JORGE 2001 - 01 - 04 66 . 95 0295320 LES CAMELA , ELISA M 2001 - 01 - 04 31 . 50 0295321 LUNA , JUVENAL 2001 - 01 - 04 95 . 28 0295322 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 04 21000 . 00 0295323 LEWELLYN TECHNOLOGY 2001 - 01 - 04 349 . 00 0295324 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 04 222 . 26 0295325 MOON , NANCY 2001 - 01 - 04 2 , 031 . 06 0295326 MUNICIPAL CODE CORP 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 021 . 55 0295327 MASTELLER , MOLER & REED , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 4 , 180 . 00 0295328 MEDIATION , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 770 . 33 JANUARY 16 , 0t i u - 6 - CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 095329 MEDCHECK 2001 - 01 - 04 62E . 5330 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 04 500 . 00 0295331 MOSS , ROGER 2001 - 01 - 04 30 . 90 0295332 MCGUIRE , GEORGE SEAN 2001 - 01 - 04 139 . 7E 0295333 MEZZINA , PATRICIA 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 185 . 10 0295334 MEDICARE PART B 2001 - 01 - 04 779 . 61 0295335 MERCURI , DEBRA 2001 - 01 - 04 62 . 98 0295336 MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 52 . 00 0295337 MEYER , NORMAN MD 2001 - 01 - 04 34 . 00 0295338 MURPHY , DEBBIE 2001 - 01 - 04 105 . 00 0295339 MARTIN , CRISTI 2001 - 01 - 04 56 . 00 0295340 MAGANO , IGNACIO MD 2001 - 01 - 04 29 . 00 0295341 NAPIER , WILLIAM MATT 2001 - 01 - 04 9 . 86 0295342 N E C BUSINESS NETWORK 2001 - 01 - 04 3 , 264 . 00 0295343 NICHOLS , EVELYN 2001 - 01 - 04 119 . 53 0295344 NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES 2001 - 01 - 04 2 , 500 . 00 0295345 NEMOURS CHILDREN ' S CLINIC 2001 - 01 - 04 675 . 00 0295346 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 04 836 . 55 0295347 ON IT ' S WAY 2001 - 01 - 04 652 . 48 0295348 OFFICE DEPOT , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 3 , 751 . 10 0295349 ORLANDO , KAREN M 2001 - 01 - 04 217 . 00 0295350 OHLER , MATTHEW AND KRISTEN 2001 - 01 - 04 500 . 00 0295351 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2001 - 01 - 04 158 . 12 0295352 POSTMASTER 2001 - 01 - 04 5 , 000 . 00 0295353 POWER , JOHN H ESQ 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 284 . 00 0295354 PAVCO CONSTRUCTION , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 25 , 011 . 00 0295355 PARKER , DEBBIE 2001 - 01 - 04 92 . 70 0295356 PROSPER , JANET C 2001 - 01 - 04 213 . 50 0295357 PROFORMA 2001 - 01 - 04 87 . 45 0295358 P B S & J 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 400 . 00 0295359 POWERPLAN 2001 - 01 - 04 129 . 27 0295360 PENA , JORGE 2001 - 01 - 04 30 . 90 0295361 PERRY , THEODORE G MD 2001 - 01 - 04 10 . 00 0295362 QUALITY BOOKS , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 51424 . 55 0295363 RADIOSHACK 2001 - 01 - 04 80 . 95 0295364 R GEORGE & ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 197 . 69 0295365 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC 2001 - 01 - 04 571 . 46 0295366 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 2001 - 01 - 04 45 . 44 0295367 RELIABLE POLY JOHN SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 04 123 . 03 0295368 REYNA , JIMMY LEE 2001 - 01 - 04 10 . 30 0295369 ROYAL , THOMAS 2001 - 01 - 04 99 . 18 0295370 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET 2001 - 01 - 04 213 . 89 0295371 ROYAL , SUSAN 2001 - 01 - 04 72 . 10 0295372 RHINEHART , VALERIE 2001 - 01 - 04 216 . 24 0295373 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 49 . 95 0295374 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2001 - 01 - 04 368 . 10 0295375 SHELTRA & SON CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 04 16 , 061 . 41 0295376 SOUTHEAST DESALTING ASSOC 2001 - 01 - 04 15 . 00 0295377 SIGN PRO 2001 - 01 - 04 299 . 69 0295378 SEBASTIAN CHARTER JUNIOR HIGH 2001 - 01 - 04 6 , 421 . 95 0295379 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY 2001 - 01 - 04 22 . 38 0295380 SIMES CONSTRUCTION CO INC 2001 - 01 - 04 500 . 00 0295381 SPEIRS , DONNA 2001 - 01 - 04 73 . 50 0295382 SMITH , TROY AND AMY 2001 - 01 - 04 154 . 05 0295383 SCOTT ' S TREE SERVICE INC 2001 - 01 - 04 150 . 00 0295384 TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 2 , 274 . 00 0295385 TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES 2001 - 01 - 04 77 . 47 0295386 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2001 - 01 - 04 42 . 00 0295387 SMITH , TERRY L 2001 - 01 - 04 74 . 06 0295388 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2001 - 01 - 04 430 . 56 0295389 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 04 25 . 31 0295390 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2001 - 01 - 04 91718 . 80 JANUARY 16 , 2001 - 7 - CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0295391 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA X295392 VELDE FORD , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 10 . 00 J295393 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 4 _; 6 . 71 0295394 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , �' � 3 . 97 2001 - 01 - 04 383 . 76 0295395 VERO ORTHOPAEDICS 2001 - 01 - 04 29 . 00 0295396 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 01 - 04 0295397 VEY , CARRIE 25 . 00 2001 - 01 - 04 252 . 00 0295398 WALGREENS PHARMACY # 4248 2001 - 01 - 04 0295399 WESTON WOODS 45 . 88 2001 - 01 - 04 234 . 88 0295400 WORLD ALMANAC EDUCATION 2001 - 01 - 04 0295401 WAL - MART PHARMACY , INC 19 . 25 2001 - 01 - 04 169 . 54 0295402 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2001 - 01 - 04 0295403 WILLIAMS , BETTY R , RN 52 . 00 2001 - 01 - 04 44 . 00 0295404 WALGREENS PHARMACY # 4642 2001 - 01 - 04 0295405 WODTKE , RUSSELL 17 . 19 2001 - 01 - 04 24 . 36 0295406 WALGREEN CO 2001 - 01 - 04 0295407 WILLIAM GLOVER INC 921 . 32 2001 - 01 - 04 500 . 00 0295408 WILSON , STEVEN 2001 - 01 - 04 0295409 MILLER , JOSEPH 30 . 90 2001 - 01 - 04 601 . 92 0295410 WODTKE , RUSSELL 2001 - 01 - 04 0295411 LICARI , LINDA 591 . 94 2001 - 01 - 04 195 . 20 0295412 MERCURI , DEBRA 2001 - 01 - 04 0295413 ROYAL , THOMAS 2 243 . 07 001 - 01 - 04 486 . 30 0295414 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 0295415 ATEEQ , HASHEM 10 7 . 96 2001 - 01 - 04 7 . 13 0295416 HIFNY , OTHMAN 2001 - 01 - 04 0295417 PEPPERS III , DOLPHUS 29 . 11 2001 - 01 - 04 43 . 11 0295418 TURNER , JOAN 2001 - 01 - 04 0295419 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES 15 . 78 2001 - 01 - 04 287 , 21 0295420 JOHNSON , TODD M 2001 - 01 - 04 0295421 BURGER , PAULA & RICHARD 60 . 05 2001 - 01 - 04 37 . 56 0295422 COONEY , ADAM 2001 - 01 - 04 0295423 HARTLEY , SUSAN 13 . 28 2001 - 01 - 04 40 . 94 0295424 RICHARD , NANCY L 2001 - 01 - 04 0295425 WAY , MAURICE T 14 . 88 2001 - 01 - 04 34 . 79 0295426 MATHIAK , MABEL 2001 - 01 - 04 0295427 ELOVITZ JR , JOSEPH 14 . 26 2001 - 01 - 04 23 . 88 0295428 TOZZOLO BROTHERS 2001 - 01 - 04 0295429 D AMICO , MILDRED 40 . 68 2001 - 01 - 04 4 . 92 0295430 BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION CO 2001 - 01 - 04 0295431 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 2001 - 01 - 04 61 . 79 0295432 SCOTT , JOHNNIE & HYCINTH 125 . 47 2001 - 01 - 04 7 . 87 0295433 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO , INC 2001 - 01 - 04 0295434 CENTURY 21 OCEANSIDE 57 . 01 2001 - 01 - 04 44 . 38 0295435 MINTERN , PHYLLIS 2001 - 01 - 04 0295436 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 6 . 50 0295437 BARTH CONSTRUCTION III INC 2001 - 01 - 04 50 . 36 2001 - 01 - 04 50 . 37 0295438 GURSON , PAUL OR CAROL 2001 - 01 - 04 0295439 GHO VER BEACH INC 31 . 73 2001 - 01 - 04 111 . 46 0295440 ALEXANDER , LINDA 2001 - 01 - 04 48 . 43 0295441 MGH CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 04 47 , 6 � 0295442 LIEFORT , ROBERT 2001 - 01 - 04 0295443 THEROUX , ROLAND L 29 . 44 2001 - 01 - 04 63 . 55 0295444 CAVIT CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 04 100 . 00 0295445 PEACHEY , LUKE 2001 - 01 - 04 29 . 91 0295446 BERNAZZANI , JILL M 2001 - 01 - 04 19 . 62 0295447 DULAC , JILL M 2001 - 01 - 04 48 . 36 0295448 SEA OAKS INVESTMENT LTD 2001 - 01 - 04 60 . 86 0295449 AMERITREND HOMES 2001 - 01 - 04 53 . 57 0295450 DALTON , JOHN 2001 - 01 - 04 = 7 . 97 0295451 BROCO , REYNALDO 2001 - 01 - 04 Liy2 0295452 SIMES CPNSTRUCTION CO INC 2001 - 01 - 04 53 . 05 JANUARY i Vigo ) G 7 2 - g - CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 2295453 LEE , KATHERINE D 2001 - 01 - 04 0295454 CHANNING CORP XXIX 2001 - 01 - 04 1 .. % . 2 0295455 VALTRAIN , ANNIE BELL 2001 - 01 - 04 41 . 00 0295456 WALLACE , ERA 2001 - 01 - 04 99 . 45 0295457 ROYAL PALM HOMES INC 2001 - 01 - 04 77 . 08 0295458 LUBRANO , DIANE 2001 - 01 - 04 29 . 96 0295459 BROWN , CHARLOTTE C 2001 - 01 - 04 16 . 46 0295460 ZUGELTER CONSTRUCTION CORP 2001 - 01 - 04 36 . 73 0295461 RCL DEVELOPMENT 2001 - 01 - 04 90 . 95 0295462 AMERITREND HOOMES 2001 - 01 - 04 57 . 56 0295463 PNC MORTGAGE 2001 - 01 - 04 798 . 42 0295464 WAY , MAURICE T 2001 - 01 - 04 5 . 20 0295465 PEACHEY , LUKE 2001 - 01 - 04 14 . 51 0295466 BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 04 26 . 41 0295467 LIEFFORT , ROBERT 2001 - 01 - 04 18 . 16 0295468 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 01 - 04 10 . 50 0295469 DAVIS , RUSSELL 2001 - 01 - 04 13 . 06 0295470 HODGE , CAREY 2001 - 01 - 04 22 . 95 0295471 GHO VERO BEACH INC 2001 - 01 - 04 26 . 41 0295472 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 2001 - 01 - 04 27 . 31 0295473 POSLOSKI , ZENA 2001 - 01 - 04 14 . 26 0295474 WALKER , SCOTT A 2001 - 01 - 04 61 . 97 0295475 D F MAYNARD ASSOC INC 2001 - 01 - 04 68 . 76 0295476 BUDAY , MATTHEW 2001 - 01 - 04 35 . 01 0295477 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 04 112 . 79 0295478 VERO BEACH ASSOC 2001 - 01 - 04 14 . 57 0295479 CARROLL , DEANN 2001 - 01 - 04 50 . 15 0295480 CROOM CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 04 172 . 98 549 , 412 . 29 7. B. PROCLAMATIONHONORING GAIL F. KEMP ON HER RETIREMENT The Chairman entered the following Proclamation on the record : i PROCLAMATION HONORING GAIL F . KEMP ON HER RETIREMENT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 18 , 2001 WHEREAS , Gail has announced her retirement from the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division, and Indian River County Board of County Commissioners effective January 18 , 200 1 ; and JANUARY 16 , 2001PG 723 - 9 - WHEREAS , Gail has been employed with Indian River County since May 4 , 1987 . During her tenure with the County, Gail began as a Secretary in the Probation Office. Then in 1988 , she was promoted to Secretary III and transferred to the Public Works Department, Engineering Division. In 1997 , Gail was promoted once again and became a Traffic Technician with the Traffic Engineering Division, which is the position she holds today ; and WHEREAS , Gail has always received excellent or above average evaluations ; and WHEREAS , Gail has played a lead role in organizing the records of the Traffic Engineering Division; in particular, the traffic accident reports and computerized summaries . Gail prepared annual accident summaries, cross-referenced by accident location, frequency and rate. These summaries were of immense value to the County and assisted in the installation of traffic signals and other traffic safety measures . Gail often worked long hours to ensure that reports were completed quickly and accurately; and WHEREAS , Gail has been both a citizen and a public servant striving for the betterment of both the community and its environment through her long years of unselfish service to the public ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board expresses their deep appreciation for the dedicated service Gail Kemp has given to Indian River County over the past thirteen years ; The Public Works Department of Indian River County wishes to express their appreciation to Gail for an outstanding career on behalf of Indian River County and extend our heartfelt wishes for her success in her future endeavors . Dated this 16`h day of January 2001 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Caroline Ginn, ONairman JANUARY 16 , 202KI P G7 - 10 - 70C LAWSUITS - SETTLEMENT OF WARD L: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY The Board reviewed a Memorandum of Januan7 9 , 2001 : Indian River County , Florida Memorandum TO : James E . Chandler, County Administrator THRU : Joseph Baird , Assistant County Administrator FROM . Beth Jordan , Risk Manager_ DATE : January 9 , 2001 SUBJECT : Request for Consent Agenda ; Ward v . Indian River County Please consider the following information item for inclusion on the January 16 , 2001 Board of County Commissioners ' agenda . The February 16 , 1996 , automobile liability claim of Susan Ward has been settled by the Claims Review Committee for $ 15 , 000 . 00 . The acceptance was unanimous . In keeping with Administrative Policy and the self-insurance program , no further action is required by the Board of County Commissioners . NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN . JANUARY 16 , 2001 � G - 11 - 7. D. LAWSUITS - SETTLEMENT OF COOGAN V. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 9 , 2001 : Indian River County , Florida Memorandum TO : James E . Chandler, County Administrator THRU : Joseph Baird , Assistant County Administrator FROM : Beth Jordan , Risk Manager�1 DATE : January 9 , 2001 1 SUBJECT: Request for Consent Agenda ; Coogan v . Indian River County Please consider the following information item for inclusion on the January 16 , 2001 Board of County Commissioners ' agenda . The August 11 , 1992 , workers ' compensation claim for Maureen Coogan , a former employee of the Sheriff, has been settled by the Claims Review Committee for $ 10 , 000 . 00 in indemnity benefits and $ 10 , 000 . 00 for her attorney ' s fees and costs . The acceptance was unanimous . In keeping with Administrative Policy and the self- insurance program , no further action is required by the Board of County Commissioners . NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN . JANUARY 16 , 2001 8 ioPG 726 - 12 - 7. E. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGETAMENDMEA'T # 008 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 10 , 2001 : TO : Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE : January 10 , 2001 SUBJECT : Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 008 THROUGH : Joseph A . Baird Assistant County Administrator FROM : Jason E . Brown Budget Manager l Description And Conditions The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following : 1 . The Indian River County Libraries have received a total of $ 12 , 256 in donations . The attached entry appropriates these funds . 2 . Digital aerial photography is needed to improve the County' s GIS database . County staff has reached an agreement with the Property Appraiser' s office to split the cost of this project , since this will benefit both agencies . The total cost should be about $ 30 , 000 , and the County' s portion is 50 % or $ 15 , 000 . This will provide better digital images for the entire County east of the St . John ' s Marsh . Funding will come from General Fund contingencies . 3 . On January 9 , 2001 the Board of Commissioners approved various expenditures under the Emergency Management Performance Grant ( EMPG ) , which was formerly called the State and Local Agreement . The attached entry appropriates funding in the amount of $ 33 , 775 , as approved by the Board . 4 . Computer Services needs to purchase additional equipment and servers for the County ' s network system . The attached entry approves funding from General Fund contingencies for $ 16 , 600 . 5 . On October 3 , 2000 , the Board of Commissioners approved a grant agreement with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission . This grant provides $ 20 , 000 for evaluating fish populations on four artificial reefs built in 2000 . The attached entry appropriates the use of these funds . 6 . On January 9 , 2001 , the Board of Commissioners approved a public official bond for incoming Sheriff Roy Raymond . The attached entry appropriates funding from General Fund contingencies for $ 1 , 700 . JANUARY 16 , 2001 811I b o - 13 - 7 . Traffic Engineering needs to replace a bucket truck. This vehicle would need cost prohibitive repairs to remain functional . Funding will be provided by Transportation Fund contingencies . 8 . Road & Bridge needs to resurface several local roads . The attached entry appropriates funding from Secondary Road Construction cash forward for $ 300 , 000 . Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment . ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge , SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget Amendment # 008 , as recommended by staff. TO : Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT : 008 of County Commissioners FROM : Jason E . BrownDATE : January 10 2001 Budget Manager 71GENERAL Fund/Department Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease EVENUESENERAL FUND/ Donations - Mainibrary 001 -000-366-095 . 00 $ 11 , 743 $ 0 FUND/ Donations - North ounty Library 001 -000- 366-097 . 00 $ 513 $ 0 EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/ Other Contractual Services 001 - 109- 571 -033 . 49 $ 1 , 500 $0 GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/ Youth Books 001 - 109-571 -038 . 11 $ 3 , 500 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/ Miscellaneous Youth Programming 001 - 109-571 -038 . 19 $ 1 , 500 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Main Library/ EDP Equipment 001 - 109- 571 -066 . 47 $4 , 587 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ North County Library/ Other Operating Supplies 001 - 112 - 571 -035 . 29 $ 1 , 169 $ 0 JANUARY 16 , 200 - 14 - TO : Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT : 000 of County Commissioners FROM : Jason E . Brown 1' ' DATE : January 10 , 2001 Budget Manager Entry Fund/Department Number Account- Name I Account Number Increase Decrease I� 2 . EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Computer Services/ Other Professional 001 -241 -513-033 . 19 $ 15 , 000 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies 001 - 199- 581 -099 . 91 $ 0 $ 15 , 000 3 . REVENUES GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management Performance Grant 001 -000- 331 -023 . 00 $ 339775 $ 0 EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/ Travel 001 -208- 525-039 . 02 $ 6 , 800 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/ Tuition & Registration 001 -208- 525-039 . 43 $ 19500 $0 GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/ Computer Hardware 001 -208- 525-035 . 13 $ 1 , 500 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Emergency Management/ EDP Equipment 001 - 208-525-066 .47 $239975 $ 0 i �! 4 . I EXPENSES I I iir t i { i GENERAL FUND/ Computer Services/ EDP Equipment 001 -241 - 513-066 . 47 $4 , 500 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Computer Services/ Computer Hardware 001 -241 - 513-035 . 13 $ 11 , 500 $0 GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/ Computer Software 001 - 102 - 512-035 . 12 $250 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/ Computer Hardware 001 - 102- 512-035 . 13 $ 350 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Contingencies 001 - 199-581 -099 . 91 $ 0 $ 16 , 600 5 . REVENUES BEACH RESTORATION FUND/ Florida Fish & Wildlife Comm . Grant 128-000- 331 -701 . 00 $20 , 000 $ 0 EXPENSES BEACH REST. FUND/ Oth . Svcs . 128- 144- 572 -033 . 19 $ 17 , 000 $ 0 BEACH REST . FUND/ EDP Equip . 128- 144- 572-066 . 47 $ 39000 $ 0 JANUARY 16 , 2001r - 15 - TO : Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 008 of County Commissioners FROM : Jason E . Brown � " DATE : January 10 , 2001 Bud et Mana er I \ Entry Fund/Department/ Number AccouffName Account Number Increase Decrease 6 , EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Board of Commissioners/ Other Professional 001 - 101 -511 -033 . 19 $ 19700 $0 GENERAL FUND/ Contingencies 001 - 199-581 -099 . 91 $0 $ 1 , 700 7 , EXPENSES TRANSPORTATION/ Traffic Engineering/ Automotive 111 - 245- 541 - 066 . 42 $30 , 000 $0 TRANSPORTATION/ Contingencies 111 - 199- 581 -099 . 91 $ 0 $ 30 , 000 8 . REVENUES SECONDARY ROADS/ Cash Fwd . 109-000-389-030 . 00 $300 , 000 $ 0 EXPENSES SECONDARY ROADS/ Resurfacing 109-214- 541 -066 . 36 1 $300 , 000 j $ 0 7. F. OUT- OF- COUNTY TRAVEL - VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE TO ATTEND HISTORIC PRESERVATION DAY 2001 IN TALLAHASSEE, FL ON MARCH 21 -229 2001 The Board reviewed the following : HISTORIC PRESERVATION DAY 2001 Co-Sponsored by the Florida Trust and the Bureau of Historic Preservation March 21-22, 2001 Tallahassee, Florida *Nineteenth Annual Preservation Day * Armed with Current Information, Meet with Your Legislators eMake Your Voice Heard - Speak Out for Preservation • Reception to Honor the Secretary of State Katherine Harris & Florida Legislature • Network with Florida Preservationists JANUARY 16 , 2001 8 r ! i e?- Q - 16 - ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge , SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved out - of- county travel for Vice Chairman Stanbridge to attend Historic Preservation Day 2001 in Tallahassee on March 21 - 22 , 2001 , as requested . 7. Ci. OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT LLC - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR OAK CHASE PHASE H The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 8 , 2001 : TO : James E . Chandler County Administrator DIV N HEAD CONCURRENCE : //w5z L o ert M. Keating , AICP Community Development Ditectoi THROUGH : Stan Boling , AICP Planning Director FROM : Mark Zans Staff Planner, Current Development DATE : January 8 , 2001 SUBJECT : Oak Chase Development LLC, Request for Final Plat Approval for Oak Chase Phase II It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 16 , 2001 . DESCRIPTION AND ONDITIONS : Oak Chase Phase II is a 36 lot 23 . 48 acre portion of a three phase project located on the north side of 33rd Street and on the east side of 66 " Avenue . The property is zoned RS - 3 ( residential JANUARY 16 , 2001 89 1 1 r3 PG 7 31 - 17 - single- family, up to 3 unit/acre) . The density of the subdivision is 2 . 47 units per acre . Phase I has been constructed. Phase II is encompassed in this final plat, is located immediately north of Phase I , and provides for an extension of the roadway and storm water tracts from Phase I . The remaining portion of the overall project is to be constructed in a subsequent phase . At its regular meeting of April 8 , 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat approval for the overall subdivision. The applicant is requesting final plat approval for Phase II and is bonding out all required improvements as part of the final plat approval process . The owner, Oak Chase Development L . L . C . , through its agent Carter Associates Inc , is now requesting final approval and has submitted the following : 1 . A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat . 2 . Certified Engineer ' s Cost estimate for remaining improvements . 3 . A Contract for Construction for the remaining required subdivision improvements . 4 . Security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction. ANALYSIS : A majority of the required subdivision improvements have been constructed, with the exception of some infrastructure items and landscaping improvements Staff anticipates that all cost estimates and security amounts will be finalized and approved prior to the Board ' s January 16 `' meeting . The developer has made arrangements with Public Works to submit a final engineers cost estimate and financial security after the Board of County Commissioners grants final plat approval . The format of the financial security has been approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, and unit cost estimates for construction items have been approved by Public Works . The developer also has submitted a copy of the Contract for Construction of Required Improvements . The contract, which is on a standard form approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, will be executed by the developer after the January 16 , 2001 Board meeting date . Once the final cost estimate is approved by staff and the appropriate financial security is submitted, the plat will be recorded . All subdivision improvements are privately dedicated with the exception of the utility system, which is separately warranted through the Department of Utility Services . Therefore, no subdivision warranty and maintenance agreement is require . B E C Q117111 E YpATi41Y Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final plat approval for the Oak Chase Phase II , authorize the Chairman to execute the Contract for Construction and any security documents, and accept the security . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Application 2 . Location Map Plat Graphic 4 . Contract for Construction (Draft) JANUARY 16 , 2001 81 1 1 - PG 7J - 18 - ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge , SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously granted final plat approval for Oak Chase Phase IL authorized the Chairman to execute the Contract for Construction and any security documents ; and accepted the security ; all as recommended by staff. DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 8 . A . SHERIFF ROY RAYMOND - REQUEST TO DONATE $ 500 FROM FORFEITURE FUND TO PARTNERSHIP WITH " A CHILD IS MISSING " PROGRAM The Board reviewed a letter of January 8 , 2001 : JANUARY 16 , 2001 15 PG 7 3 3 - 19 - & bertf f 9 ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COU DO �6 , ^ 2 MEMBEF ° %A7a SHEa HE PSS ASSOCI , A� 00 'NEM9E4 _ = ria7lpNaL SHERIFFS a550Gat , Ot+ r� UD 4055 41 St AVENUE VERO BEACH . FLORIDA 32960- 1808 r� E ( 567 ) -6700 N January 8 , 2001 The Honorable Caroline D . Ginn, Chairman Indian River Board of County Commissioners 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394 Re : A Child Is Missing Dear Chairman Ginn : We are forming a partnership with A Child Is Missing to use their network as a tool in recovering missing children and the elderly, as well as telephone notification for sexual predators . They provide this service free to law enforcement agencies . However, they ask for donations to help support their efforts . I would like to send them a 5500 donation out of our forfeiture fund. If you need any further information, please let me know . Sincerely, cny-'�� Roy Raymond, Sheriff RR:mej cc : James E. Chandler, County Administrator Jason E . Brown, Budget Manager Harry Hall The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht , SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the Board unanimously approved the donation of $ 500 to " A Child Is Missing " from the Sheriff' s forfeiture fund , as requested . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BIK 1 16 PG 7 3 4 - 20 - 8 . B . SHERIFF ROY RAYMOND - REQUEST TO DONATE S5 , 836 . 89 EACH TO SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL AND CHILDREN ' S HOME SOCIETY FROM FORFEITURE FUND The Board reviewe (' a letter of January 8 , 2001 : i = " ti�Q " 4, ��jerif f ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMBS � = - ARIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIAi .� r. MEMBER vF NAT iDNAII- SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION 4055 41st AVENUE VERO BEACH . FLORIDA 32960- 1806 - PHONE ( 561 ) 569-51 00 January 8 , 2001 The Honorable Caroline D . Ginn, Chairman Indian River Board of County Commissioners 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394 Re : Forfeiture Fund Dear Chairman Ginn : As required by Florida Statutes, a donation of 15 percent of our forfeiture fund needs to be made annually. Accordingly, the Sheriffs Office would like to give the Substance Abuse Council and the Children 's Home Society 55 , 836 . 89 each. If you have any questions or any further information is required, please let me know . Sincerely, Roy Raymond, Sheriff RR : mej cc : James E. Chandler, County Administrator Jason E . Brown, Budget Manager Harry Hall The I73rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency .accredited by the Commission on .accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated JANUARY 16 , 2001 t15 PG 7 J - 21 - ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht , SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously approved the donation of $ 5 , 836 . 89 to the Substance Abuse Council and $ 5 , 836 . 89 to Children ' s Home Society from the Sheriff' s forfeiture fund , as requested . 9 . B . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - ATLAS DEVELOPMENT CORP . (BOSTON HOMES/ORCHID DUNES ) - APPEAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 7 - UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ( Quasi -Judicial) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 10 , 2001 : TO : James E . Chandler County Administrator DI SI N HEAD CONCURRENCE : 7 orlIf U R rf M . Keating, AICP / Community Development Dir ctor J THROUGH : Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director / FROM : John W . McCoy, AICP . x W M Senior Planner, Current Development DATE : January 10 , 2001 SUBJECT : Atlas Development Corp Appeal of a Planning and Zoning Commission Decision to Deny Site Plan Approval for a 7 Unit Residential Development JANUARY 16 , 200BK PG 736 - 22 - It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 16 , 2001 . Atlas Development Corp . has filed an appeal of a decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission to deny site plan approval for a seven unit development . At its December 147 2000 meeting , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3 to 4 on a motion to approve the project , an action which effectively resulted in a denial . For reference, please refer to the staff report and draft minutes from the December 14, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting ( see attachment #2 ) . According to the county ' s land development regulations (LDRs) , appeals of decisions of the Planning and Zoning Commission are considered by the Board of County Commissioners . The Board is authorized to review the Commission ' s decision and approve, approve with conditions , or deny the subject site plan application . The site plan application now under appeal was submitted by Knight , McGuire & Associates , Inc . on behalf of Atlas Development Corp . This application reflects the applicant ' s proposal to develop a 7 unit site planned residential development . The 1 . S3 acre subject property is located between SR A - 1 .A and the Atlantic Ocean , just north of the Summer Place subdivision, and is zoned multi - family (RM-4 ) . The homes located south of the subject site in Summer Place were built in the 1970's and are located seaward of the 1987 Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL ) and in some cases up to and partially seaward of the 1981 CCCL . North of the subject site , there is a more recently constructed home that is located just landward of the 1987 CCCL . Atlas Development is Proposing a single three story building containing 7 units a with separate pool and cabana area. The east end of the proposed 3 story building is located seaward of the 1987 CCCL , roughly alono an imaginary line drawn between the nearest Summer Place home and the newer home to the north of the subject site. As proposed, the Atlas Development project will have a single driveway connection to SR A - 1 -A to provide access to the 7 units . Through the development review process , there is required landscaping which provides for a Type "D"double frontage buffer along the south property line (Sandalwood Lane) . This site is the same site as the Boston Homes/Orchid Dunes proposed project that was considered and ultimately approved by the Board on March 21 , 2000 - That project proposed two units and two guest cottages . That project 's site plan is still valid and is the subject of a lawsuit . The Board is now to consider the site plan application and the Planning and Zoning Commission ' s denial . The Board may uphold or overturn the Planning and Zoning Commissions ' s decision . In doing so , the Board may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the subject site plan application . • Planning and Zoning Commission Action Being Appealed Procedurally, the Atlas Development Corp . application was reviewed through the county ' s standard project review process . After extensive review, staff recommended that the Pl Commission approve the site plan application subject to conditions, including a condit on hat ung and the applicant obtain a DEP coastal construction control line permit for the proposed 7 unit building and revise the site plan, if necessary, to correspond to DEP 's requirements . After considering comments from the public and the applicant, the Commission chose not to approve the site plan, an action resulting in denial of the site plan application. During discussion, the Commission indicated that its denial was based on the fact that the subject site is in an area of significant coastal erosion and that the proposed structure should be located landward of the 1987 CCCL . JANUARY 16 , 2001 7 3 7 - 23 - * Coastal Construction Regulations Through the currently proposed site plan, the applicant is proposing to locate a portion of the proposed building seaward of the 1987 CCCL and landward of the 1981 CCCL . The proposed location will be seaward of the existing home to the north ( residence built in 1990's ) , but landward of the existing homes to the south (Summerplace residences built in the 1970s) . The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) regulates construction seaward of the 1987 CCCL . County regulations prohibit construction of residences ( but do allow beach accesses ) seaward of the 1981 CCCL, and the site plan complies with these county regulations . The applicant will be required to obtain a construction permit from the DEP , and that permit will determine how far east ( seaward ) the proposed building will be allowed to project beyond (seaward of) the 198 ; CCCL . Prior to site plan release , the applicant will be required to obtain the DEP permit for all construction seaward of the 1987 CCCL . Since the early eighties , the State of Florida has regulated coastal construction in Indian River County. In 1981 , the State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) established the county ' s first coastal construction control line . That line was revised, and in many cases moved significantly landward, in 1987 . Both the 1981 and 1987 lines were established as lines of regulation . Seaward of those lines , the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP ) , successor agency to DNR. regulates all construction activity . While DEP does not pre-empt local regulation seaward of the CCCL , construction in that zone is not allowed unless permitted by DEP . The county ' s land development regulations (LDRs) address coastal construction, dune vegetation , sea turtle protection, and similar environmental regulations on oceanfront parcels. For instance, the county has designated the 1981 CCCL as the county ' s Dune Stabilization Setback Line (DSSL ) and has prohibited construction seaward of that line except for certain structures such as dune crossovers . County staff has verified that the proposed project meets the county ' s DSSL requirements . In addition to the DSSL regulation, county ordinances address the 1987 CCCL , which is located landward of the 1981 CCCL (DSSL) . LDR section 932 . 06 (3 ) states that, in regard to development seaward of the 1987 Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) , ". . . the FDNR [staff note : now D . E . P . ] and Indian River County may permit construction activity" (see attachment #3 ) . Because LDR section 932 . 06(3 ) states that the county may permit construction activity seaward of the 1987 CCCL , the county appears to have the discretion to not approve such construction . Consequently, both DEP and the county have regulatory authority and discretion regarding construction activities seaward of the 1987 CCCL . In the past, it has been county policy to let the DEP determine the extent to which a proposed structure may project seaward of the 1987 CCCL and the type of construction and conditions it must meet in order to be so located. This policy of deferral to the DEP has been applied to single-family structures as well as construction proposed as part of site plan, PD, and subdivision projects . The policy is predicated on the DEP ' s expertise in the review and permitting of coastal structures and the county ' s comparative lack of expertise in such matters . In terms of county project reviews, the policy requires DEP approval prior to site plan release for site plan projects, and prior to county building permit issuance for single- family homes . At a meeting subsequent to its initial review of the Boston Homes/Orchid Dunes appeal, the Board of County Commissioners discussed the CCCL regulations in general . At that meeting, the Board heard from citizens and experts and acknowledged the technical basis for state CCCL regulations . The Board then directed staff to continue to implement the county ' s policy of deferring to DEP regarding applications for construction seaward of the 1987 CCCL . Furthermore, the Board directed staff to coordinate with DEP on analyzing and possibly re-defining the CCCL in critically eroding areas of the county . Since that time, the county ' s coastal engineer has been coordinating with the DEP . JANUARY 16 , 2001 8K I El PG 7 3 8 - 24 - ANALYSIS • The county ' s land development regulations (LDRs) provide criteria for the Board to use in its revie of the appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission ' s decision on the site plan application . These criteria , based on LDR section 902 . 07 ( see attachment #5 ) , are as follows : ( 1 ) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to follow the appropriate review procedures ? (2 ) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner? ( 3 ) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public health, safety and welfare? (4) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to evaluate the application with respect to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations of Indian River County? The Board is to consider each of these criteria and make findings in all 4 areas addressed by the criteria. Staffs analysis of the Planning and Zoning Commission ' s decision in regard to the 4 criteria is as follows : ( 1 ) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to follow the appropriate review procedures? The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the application at a regularly scheduled meeting, heard continents from staff and all interested parties, and had lengthy discussion before making a decision . The motion was properly made, and a vote was taken as reflected in the meeting minutes ( see attachment #2 ) . In addition, proper timeframes and procedures have been followed regarding the appeal . Procedurally, the Commission appears to have conducted an appropriate review of the applications . (2) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner? - During consideration of the site plan application , the Planning and Zoning Commission questioned the staff attorney as to matters of law and questioned the applicant ' s engineer as to matters of fact . In response to questions , the staff attorney indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission could look at specific coastal properties on a case by case basis , but also indicated that the county did not have the data and analysis or expertise to determine a new line of prohibition . In questioning the applicant ' s engineer and the county ' s coastal engineer, the Commission inquired as to coastal erosion in the area, including the DEP ' s method for determining how far seaward of the 1987 CCCL . a structure is generally allowed to extend, setbacks used for development within the Town of Orchid and Windsor, and methods of construction used in such coastal locations . Some Planning and Zoning Commissioners stated at the end of the discussion that no one could present evidence that the project failed to meet the LDRs, while other commissioners JANUARY 16 , 2001 0 PG 739 - 25 - stated that the county did not have the knowledge or policies in place to approve the project . - After reviewing the referenced information and discussing the applications , the Planning and Zoning Commission denied the application, by failing to approve it . The commissioners who voted against the motion to approve the project did not give specific reasons for their vote . However, discussion during the meeting indicated that commissioners had concerns that the project area is an erosion "hot spot", that the county has the discretion under the LDRs to not approve construction seaward of the 1987 CCCL , and that the county does not have the knowledge and expertise to evaluate the construction proposed seaward of the 1987 CCCL . These concerns appear to be the basis of the denial . In staffs opinion, the decision to deny was arbitrary because : * The 1987 CCCL was never established as a line of prohibition and no evidence was presented that the 1987 CCCL is the appropriate line seaward of which construction should be prohibited for this property . * The prohibition of construction seaward of the 1987 CCCL on the subject property will not be consistently applied to other oceanfront parcels, because construction of single- family homes on oceanfront lots are reviewed and approved by staff, and current LDRs do not allow staff to restrict construction of single- family homes seaward of the 1987 CCCL . • There was no evidence presented to challenge the fact the DEP ' s 1987 CCCL permitting process ensures that structures built seaward of the 1987 CCCL will be adequately engineered for oceanfront conditions , thereby obviating the need for more of a setback from the ocean . The decision to deny the application raises two policy questions . What is the objective of location restrictions along the coastline? What is the purpose of the 1987 CCCL and how does DEP apply its regulations seaward of that line ? If the objective of the denial is to move the proposed units landward to protect them from coastal erosion, then the issue of construction standards must be considered . Because stringent DEP construction standards do not apply to structures that are located entirely landward of the 1987 CCCL , structures may be better protected by being built seaward of the 1987 CCCL and built to a higher construction standard, than structures built to the lower standard and located immediately landward of the 1987 CCCL . Requiring the higher construction standards for structures partially or wholly seaward of the 1-987 CCCL puts the DEP in a much better position to deny future seawall permits for such structures, since the structures are designed and built to stand-up under storm events . If the objective of the denial is to convert the 1987 CCCL from a line of regulation to a line of prohibition in areas that appear to be significantly eroding , then the gathering of substantial competent evidence is necessary . If the 1987 CCCL becomes a line of prohibition rather than a line of regulation without some competent substantial data to support it as a line of prohibition, such use of the line becomes arbitrary . In establishing the 198 , CCCL , the DEP used the best science available at the time to predict coastdi erosion and arrive at a line of regulation . Through the permitting process , the DEP can apply its criteria on a site- by-site basis to establish the conditions JANUARY 16 , 2001 BI a - 26 - for any given site, especially sites where significant erosion is occurring . 1 he DEP has adopted the line as a line of regulation to review construction proposals on a site-bv-site basis . Thus, there is a process in place for experts to review proposed construction on a site -bv- site basis . The Planning and Zoning Commission ' s decision would eliminate such a review without underlying expert evidence . The staff is continuing to coordinate with the DEP on a revision to the 1987 CCCL line in critically eroded areas . Any revision to the 1987 CCCL will need to be based on substantial competent data. Until anv new line is established, it would be premature to start denying applications based on improvements located east of the 1987 CCCL . ( 3 ) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding properties , traffic circulation or public health, safety and welfare? - The Planning and Zoning Commission heard from representatives of the adjacent property owners regarding the effects that the proposed development would have on surrounding properties . Most of the comments from the property owner representatives centered on the erosion issue and the possible public health, safety, and welfare concerns that the erosion may cause . There was also discussion regarding the impact of locations of existing and proposed residences on ocean views . Thus , the record indicates that the Planning and Zoning Commission did consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding properties , traffic circulation, and health , safety, and welfare . ( 4 ) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to evaluate the application with respect to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations of Indian River County? The Planning and Zoning Commission decision was based on the same code section (932 . 06 [3 ] ) as its previous decision regarding the Boston Homes/Orchid Dunes application ( see attachment #3 ) . The Planning and Zoning Commission did discuss the applicable LDRs related to the proposed project and how the LDRs applied to the application . Therefore, the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail to review the project with respect to the applicable county LDRs . SUMMARY - The Commission ' s denial "sent a message" that Commission members continue to be concerned about the county ' s DEP deferral policy in areas where coastal erosion appears to be significant . In so doing , commissioners expressed concerns that DEP requirements may not be stringent enough in areas of significant coastal erosion and that it may be best to make these decisions locally . After two applications on this site, discussion at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and review of the subject appeal , staff s conclusion is that a great deal of study and on-going expertise would be needed if the county decides to regulate coastal construction above and beyond DEP permitting requirements . It is also staffs opinion that technically justified, specific criteria would need to be established by the county to fairly and uniformly apply the "discretion " given in LDR section 932 . 06(3 ) . Staff also notes that there are numerous structures and entire lots that are located seaward of the 1987 CCCL that would need to be carefully considered if the county "goes beyond" DEP regulation of such structures and properties . JANUARY 16 , 2001 SK l i .a6 PG 7 4 ! - 27 - Based on the absence of substantial competent evidence and objective and specific county criteria to apply to construction proposed seaward of the 1987 CCCL , the decision to deny the Atlas Development Corp . application, despite required compliance with DEP and county DSSL requirements , is arbitrary and cannot be uniformly applied to other similarly situated properties . Therefore, the Planning and Zoning Commission ' s decision does not meet all four review criteria and should be reversed, as ultimately the Boston Homes/Orchid Dunes Planning and Zoning Commission decision was reversed by the Board . RECOMMENDATION : Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners find that the Planning and Zoning Commission acted arbitrarily in its Atlas Development Corp . decision, overturn the Planning and Zoning Commissions decision, and grant major site plan approval for the Atlas Development Corp . proposal with the following conditions : 1 . Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall : a. Submit and obtain planning staff approval of details of the landscaping and irrigation improvements required on the south side of the wall that is proposed to run parallel to Sandalwood Road, and b . Obtain, and submit to county staff, a DEP permit for construction seaward of the 1987 CCCL and revise the site plan, if necessary, to comply with anv DEP permit requirements , and 2 • Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall construct the buffer required along the site ' s Sandalwood Road frontage, and construct or bond-out the 5 ' sidewalk along the site ' s SR A- 1 -A frontage. Director Boling gave a brief history of this property , including Boston Homes , Inc . ' s site plan of Orchid Dunes for 2 units which was submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission on 1 /27/00 and denied ; the subsequent appeal to the Board on March 7 , 2000 , where the denial was upheld , and the further review of the matter by the Board on March 21 , 2000 , at which time the site plan was approved with the conditions submitted . He then displayed a drawing of the old site plan and pointed out the 1987 and 1981 Coastal Construction Control Lines ( CCCL ) . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK I i F6 PG 7 4 2 - 28 - A drawing of the new site plan , which is now being appealed after its denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission , was then reviewed . Director Boling commented on the zoning of the neighboring areas , including the Disney and Sea Oaks developments to the south , and noted that multi - family zoning in most of the areas has been developed as single - family residential . The County Comprehensive Plan treats the 1981 CCCL as a line of prohibition , with an exception for dune crossover structures which are allowed seaward of that line . The Department of Environmental Protection ( DEP) regulates structures located between the 1981 and 1987 CCCLs . The 7 units proposed are the maximum number allowed and the developer proposes to save as much of the hammock as possible . Chairman Ginn questioned the erosion rate in that area. and County Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar reviewed his Memorandum of January 15 , 2001 , with attachments , and noted that this particular area has been designated a critical erosion site with erosion occurring at a rate of 2 to 3 feet per year : TO : Jeffrey R . Tabar , P . E RECEIVED Coastal Engineer JAN 15 2001 FROM : Jonathan C . Gorham , Ph . D . CLERK TO THE BOARD Environmental Analyst V SUBJECT : Florida East Coast County coastal construction rules DATE : January 15 , 2001 As instructed , I have been contacting county governments on the Florida east coast to determine if any Counties have coastal development regulations that are more stringent than the State of Florida rules in Chapter 161 , Florida Statutes and 62B - 33 FAC . This memo provides a summary of the responses received , and supporting documents are attached . In general , most Counties defer to the state rules , or have language in their Comprehensive Plans that matches the State rule language . Several Counties do have additional regulations . These JANUARY 16 , 2001 n {01 ! It J - 29 - more stringent rules may take the form of additional setback requirements , additional construction standards , or _ _ a more restrictive policy regarding l armoring stucures , rules may be either in the form aofaordinances or rastelements These Comprehensive Plans . A brief summary of responses is listed belo along with contact information for each County . in w , Nassau County It is unclear whether or not Nassau County has additional setback requirements . A co Go of the County Development Code is expected via mail , ( Walter Gosset , ( 904 ) 321 - 5782 ) , Duval County Duval County has no additional regulation at the County level . Local communities such as Neptune Beach and Jacksonville Beach may have some additional requirements . ( Walter Hogrefe , ( 904 ) 630 - 1372 ) St . Johns County No additional regulation over and above state rules . would be very concerned about legal liabilityCounty " taking ' private property with additional setback requirements other significant restrictions . g from ( Leon Shimer , quirem16 , or ( 904 ) 471 - 6616 . Flagler County The Flagler County Comprehensive Plan designates areas seaward of the CCCL as Unsafe Building Zones , subject to review by the County _ Engineer . There is no additional setback requirement or outright prohibition of construction seaward of the CCCL as long as the State permitting process is followed . The County is in the process of producing a Beach Dune Management Program , which may contain other dune protection measures . There is also an item in the Comprehensive Plan prohibiting the repair or rebuilding of any coastal armoring structure that has been more than 75 % destroyed . A copy of the Coastal Element Checklist of the Comprehensive Plan is attached . ( David Hass , ( 904 ) 437 - 7480 ) . Volusia County Volusia County has no additional setback requirements or armoring restrictions , but does have additional construction standards for the entire barrier island . While state rules require a 110mph windload design seaward of the Control Line , Volusia County also mandates a 110 mph windload design for the entire barrier island landward of the CCCL . ( Mike Nelson , ( 904 ) 736 - 5929 ) . Brevard County Brevard County includes , under its Comprehensive Plan , an additional 25 foot setback from the 1981 CCCL . This line is termed the Brevard County Coastal Setback Line . The Comprehensive Plan also includes prohibitions on new armoring structures , particularly in the north county . A copy of the Coastal Management Element of the Brevard County Comprehensive Plan is attached . ( Virginia Barker , ( 321 ) 633 - 2016 ) . St , Lucie County St Lucie County has no coastal development regulations over and above the state CCCL rules ( Julia Shewchuck , ( 561 ) 462 - 2822 ) . JANUARY 16 , 2001 8K i I PG 7 4 4 - 30 - Martin County Martin County requires an additional setback of 50 feet for coastal construction beyond what is required by state CCCL rules . Martin County Ordinance Number 462 provides for the establishment of a Dune Preservation Zone extending 50 feet landward of the 1981 CCCL . No Development is permitted within the Dune Preservation Zone . A copy of the Ordinance is attached . ( J . Ross Wilcox , ( 561 ) 288 - 5508 ) . Palm Beach County Palm Beach County has no coastal development regulations other than state CCCL rules . ( Dan Bates ( 561 ) 233 - 2414 ) . Broward Countv Broward County used to have coastal development rules that were identical to the state rules , but they have been eliminated as duplicative . ( Ken Banks , ( 954 ) 519 - 1230 ) Dade County No rule other than state CCCL regulations . ( Brian Flynn , ( 305 ) 372 - 6850 ) . Monroe County - Monroe County has almost no sand beach shoreline , and thus CCCL lines have not been established there . Monroe County development regulations were developed under a Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Community Affairs and include setbacks measured from the mean high water line . No habitable structure may be closer than 50 feet from and unaltered shoreline ( mangroves ) , 20 feet from an altered shoreline ( canal etc . ) , or 30 feet from an open water shoreline ( rocky shore ) . A Copy of the relevant regulations is attached . ( Antonia Girli , ( 305 ) 289 - 2584 ) Commissioner Adams questioned whether this plan supersedes the former plan , and Director Boling stated that the former plan is involved in the current lawsuit ; however, if the new plan is approved , that lawsuit would become moot because the current plan would be superseded . Commissioner Adams questioned whether this new plan has been submitted by the same owner . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK PG 1 4 5 - 31 - Ralph Evans , Attorney , 3355 Ocean Drive , representing the owner, Atlas Development Corporation , noted that the prior owner was Boston Homes , Inc . Atlas Development purchased the property just prior to submitting the new plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission . Chairman Ginn noted that this is not a public hearing but the Board will hear anyone from the public who wishes to speak on this matter . ( CLERK ' S NOTE : A LIST OF 23 PERSONS WHO TELEPHONED THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS " OFFICE TO EXPRESS THEIR OPPOSITION TO THE PLAN IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY ' S MEETING . ) Chester Clem , Attorney , 3333 201h Street, representing Mr . and Mrs . Steven Brown , noted that the prior plan was for 2 units while the current plan is now dealing with 7 units . He then introduced Mr . Walther and asked him to review his handout . Michael Walther , President, Coastal Tech , 3625 20 `h Street, reviewed a handout ( COPY ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY ' S MEETING IN THE CLERK ' S OFFICE ) . He noted that this is a critically eroded area and is eroding at a rate of approximately 2 to 3 feet per year . The erosion has drastically increased since 1986 and . even at 1 - foot per winter, the bluff line will soon be within 10 feet of the proposed building . At that time , the owners will be asking for a seawall . This structure would be 53 feet seaward of Mr . and Mrs . Brown ' s home . He strongly suggested that. in -light of this critical erosion , this structure should be located landward of the 1987 CCCL to avoid an adverse impact by erosion . JANUARY 16 , 2001 G 7 4 6 - 32 - Attorney Clem believed the question is whether the Board has the power and authority to act within the 1987 and 1981 CCCLs . If this plan is sent to the State , there will be public hearings , but local citizens have a right to deal with local government . If this structure is allowed , within 30 years the owners will be back for assistance . The 1987 CCCL makes sense and everyone to the north of the subject property , including Mr . and Mrs . Brown , have built behind this line . Mr . and Mrs . Brown would certainly rather have single- family residential development, but at least the Board can ask that the construction be moved back behind the 1987 CCCL . Bill Glynn , 1802 Barefoot Place , President of North Beach Civic Association and Summerplace Improvement Association , commented that this property keeps coming back before the Board . First the plan was for 6 3 , 000 - square - foot homes , then for 2 very nice homes on the edge of the dunes , and now a 7 - unit residential development is proposed . FEMA has already allocated monies to replace the dunes east of this property . The property does not actually exist . He and his neighbors are getting water against their seawalls in Summerplace and it is only getting worse . A building that large is not the right thing to do in that area . This building will be 55 - feet high in an area of single - family homes where the dune is only 8 to 10 feet high and is the only line of defense . If the Board allows 45 feet on top of that, it will tower over everything else and affect the real estate values . This Board has been very helpful to the north beach area by developing the North Beach Task Force , building the fire station , obtaining open lands for the citizens , and getting AIA and CR - 510 named as Scenic Highways . All of this hard work could be for naught . He believed the Planning and Zoning Commission did not make an arbitrary decision but a well - thought - out one . The citizens in this area need the Board ' s help to forestall this rape of the area . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK 1 16 PG 7 4 7 - 33 - Pat Carpenter, 9425 Doubloon Drive , stated that a few years ago they came to Vero Beach to build their dream home . The island is a community of beachside homes and riverfront homes and is a delightful place to live . The residents feel as though they are a part of the wonderful island environment . She did not believe the County is looking for a condominium jungle and hoped the Board would deny the project . Maud Geng , 1830 East Cayman Road , stated that she had previously lived in a more metropolitan area in a gated community and moved to Vero Beach to live in an area where there are no gates , but beach roads which are more private and individual . She asked the Board to oppose the project and preserve the special quality of Vero Beach . Bob Bruce , Vice President of North Beach Civic Association , wanted to discuss the predominant zoning , and Chairman Ginn felt it would be more appropriate for him to first discuss the matter with Planning Staff and place the discussion on the agenda . Mr . Bruce noted that the entire north barrier island is developed as single - family residential areas . He realized that the underlying zoning allows for multi - family development but felt the Board should really look at the character of the area . Ruth Myers , 1981 West Sandpiper Road , asked that the Board please ensure that all the trees are not removed . Dr . John Meyer, 1851 Cayman Road East, commented that he had walked past this property 2 weeks ago and land clearing has already begun . There is a 20 to 30 - foot swath already cut on the property . The discussion is about saving a hammock that no longer exists . JANUARY 16 , 2001 OK 1 16 PG 7 4 8 - 34 . Commissioner Stanbridge wanted to know whether land clearing has already begun . and Attorney Evans stated that the prior owner had been given a " hand type " land clearing permit . After further discussion , Commissioner Stanbridge noted that we probably need to video these sites before any clearing permits are issued so there is a record of what has been removed . Ann Hunter, 1990 Cayman Road West, stated that building so close to the ocean endangers the environment . Already there is nothing left like Summerplace . There are sewer systems and building on every available inch of property . She also noted the lack of bridges for getting everyone off the island in the event of a hurricane or other disaster . Jeff Morton , 9429 Sea Grape Drive , noted that everyone in the area has made an effort to build westward of the 1987 CCCL , while this project wants to violate the average heights in the neighborhood and does not care about being in harmony with the people already living there . He asked the Board to please make the plan conform to the existing uses . Bill Hunter , 1990 Cayman Road West, noted that when he built his home , he was told that this sort of development would never happen and he hoped it won ' t . Sarah Cawley , Sandalwood Road , has lived in the area for about 30 years and all the remarks about the erosion are absolutely true . This project is also too high for the area . JANUARY 16 , 2001 EN i 6 PG 7 4 9 - 35 - Mary Berkshaw , Barefoot Place , moved here 2 years ago from Key Biscayne . This is a lovely place and she would hate to see development happen here as it did in South Florida . Director Keating reported on his investigation into the land clearing permit and noted that a limited land clearing permit has been given which only allows clearing underbrush in specific areas . Commissioner Stanbridge asked whether code violations are being checked out , and Director Keating stated that it will be checked . Commissioner Macht felt the wording of the permit should be checked in an effort to make certain that it cannot be too widely interpreted and the clearing go too far before the plans are approved . Attorney Evans stated that this property is zoned multi - family and the height of the building meets the requirements of the LDRs . His client has made an application for this project and all regulations of the LDRs have been met . If this were a single- family residence , there would never have been a site plan and no discussion about erosion at the County level . The zoning permits what the applicant has applied for . The basic issue is whether the Board can deny the project because it is seaward of the 1987 CCCL . Chapter 161 , F . S . , states that the County may regulate construction in the area between the 1987 and the 1981 CCCL if the county develops rules and regulations and submits a request to the DEP to undertake this regulation . That has not happened in this county . The County does not, therefore ,. have the authority to grant or deny permits without statutory DEP approval . This County has the practice of sending these requests to DEP and the CCCL is regulated by DEP . This footprint and site plan is the same and if we were a single- family residence . JANUARY 16 , 2001 P 7 5 0 - 36 - we would not be in this bind . When you apply for a permit, part of the requirement is construction to withstand water and you give up the right to come back later for armoring . The public is upset -about using this land in accordance with the regulations . It is not fair to work with staff for months on the regulations , have staff approve the plan and say we meet all LDR requirements , and then we go to P &Z with no representation , expecting to get their approval and instead get their denial . The same thing is true when the appeal to the Board is filed and the Chairman opens the floor to public comment . We have no idea what they are going to present and no way to prepare for their objections . He had never seen their handouts or examined their challenges . He was told there are no conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan . County staff represents Mr . Brown and every other person in this County . They are supposed to be the watchdogs for the County . Mr . Evans objected to the Chairman ' s opening the discussion to the public and asked that the Board overturn P &Z ' s denial . ( CLERK ' S NOTE : MR . EVANS SUBMITTED INTO THE RECORD ( 1 ) A COPY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ' S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN APPELLATE DIVISION , CIRCUIT COURT CASE NO . 000259 - CA- 20AND (2 ) EXCERPT OF COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF CCCL ON MARCH 21 , 2000 . THESE DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY ' S MEETING IN THE CLERK ' S OFFICE . ) Mr . Bruce wondered if the owners of the new development would like it when they move in and realize that the neighbors were all worried about the erosion and might take some action against the developer for putting them in harm ' s way . Chairman Ginn then closed the meeting to public comment . JANUARY 16 , 2001 - 37 - Commissioner Macht noted that all the " quasi -judicial " requirement imposes on the Board is that nothing can be said out of the hearing of the public . There is no requirement for examining pre- trial evidence . County Attorney Bangel agreed that Commissioner Macht ' s comment was correct and noted that the County ' s ordinance governing procedure does give the presiding officer the discretion to open the meeting to public comment . Commissioner Stanbridge questioned the Board ' s responsibilities in this matter , and Deputy County Attorney Will Collins stated that the language in the County ' s code implies that the Board may or may not approve the new plan . The rules , however , must be applied consistently unless and until the County adopts codes approved by DEP . The Board is making rules when it acts " legislatively " and in taking an application and applying the rules acts " quasi judicially " , saying that the plan either does or does not meet the requirements set forth . If the plan meets the rules , it should be approved . Commissioner Stanbridge then questioned whether the Board has the discretion to add the common - sense factors of health , safety and the welfare of the citizens . Attorney Collins stated that, where the rules are inadequate , the Board can act to protect health , safety and welfare . They cannot, however, change the rules on a case - by - case basis . Commissioner Stanbridge continued that the County has critically eroded areas and should not put people in harm ' s way . Attorney Collins noted that the Board is not permitting homes to go in harm ' s way , they are simply allowing them to apply to DEP . JANUARY 16 , 2001 - 38 - Commissioner Macht emphasized that the Board is still responsible for taking care of what is put before it . The people in North Beach have built single - family construction all the way down to CR- 510 . Another consideration should be the simple courtesy awarded from neighbor to neighbor . Blocking the view of a neighbor could not be considered courteous . He felt that P &Z did not consider a number of facts including the visual evidence of erosion and the health , safety and welfare of the people who will live in that development . He saw no reason to permit a dangerous situation even though it may meet the letter of the law . Martin and Broward Counties have seen fit to extend the CCCL one way or the other and the state has set requirements to build elevated buildings , more than a tacit admission that the building will be in harm ' s way . When the City of Vero Beach was asked to be the determining authority in 1986 or 1987 , the City Manager commented that DEP simply wanted to get out of the stream of lawsuits which they could see coming . MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht , SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , to uphold the Planning & Zoning Commission ' s decision . Chairman Ginn questioned how much FEMA money has been dedicated to restoration of this area , and County Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar stated that the County has received $ 900 , 000 from FEMA to replace 2 miles of dunes directly to the south of this site , including the adjacent property . Chairman Ginn felt the State has done a very poor job in protecting the area between the CCCLs . She felt that revisions to the regulations should be on the front burner before any more of these projects are presented . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK i 16 PG 7 5 3 - 39 - Scott McGuire of Knight and McGuire stated that they have had a lot of meetings with the adjacent property owner and have tried to come up with a plan to satisfy them to no avail . The developer would be willing to accept a condition that the building be located behind the 1987 CCCL . Chairman Ginn reminded the Board that there is a motion on the floor to uphold the P &Z decision . Commissioner Adams commented that if another condition is added , it would start the process all over again . Any further conditions should have been brought to staff before this time . Commissioner Tippin wished he did not have to vote and commented that he would not build over there even if he could afford it . He supported the motion because the building should be behind the 1987 CCCL and he felt there should be a common- sense approach to the erosion problem . THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the Motion carried unanimously . CONSENSUS was reached to direct staff to move forward with revisions to the regulations . Me PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS — SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 23, 2001 Ch FOREST LAKE PETITION WATER SERVICE — RESOLUTION III The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 2 , 2001 : JANUARY 16 , 2001 1 (S PG 7 5 4 - 40 - DATE : : JANUARY 2 2001 TO : MARGARET GUNTER EXECUTIVE SECRETARY/ASSISTANT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION THRU : DONALD R. HUBBS , P. I DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S FRONT : : JAMES D. CHAS 4 !MANAGER O AS MENT PROJECTS SUBJ : : PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM FOR BCC — JANUARY 23 , 2001 , PUBLIC HEARING FOREST LADE WATER SERVICE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION III INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO . U'vv-00-26- DS The follow m2 item is scheduled for public hearing on Januar ? ; . 2000 : therefore this notice should be included in the agrnda for the meeting prior. on January 16 , 2000 FOREST LAKE PETITION WATER SERVICE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY" PROJECT NO . UW -00 - 26 - DS RESOLUTION III (2) FRANKBARATTA - REQUEST TO REZONE f32 36 ACRES L OCA TED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SR- 60 AND 74TH A VENUE FROMA -I TO RM- 8 (QUASI JUDICIAL ) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 8 , 2001 : JANUARY 16 , 2001 BIK 11 ' Pv 755 - 41 - TO : James E . Chandler; County Administrator DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE : or ' Robert M . Keating, A1CP ; ommunity evelopment Director THROUGH : Sasan Rohani , AICP ; Chief, Long -Range Planning �5 Yj FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long-Range Planning DATE : January 8 , 2001 SUBJECT : Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for the January 23, 2001 , Board Meeting It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 16, 2001 . DESCRIPTION AN CONDITIOM : Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration at its January 23 , 2001 , meeting . 1 . Frank Baratta ' s request to rezone ±32 . 36 acres located near the southeast comer of SR 60 and 74`h Avenue, from A- 1 , Agricultural District ( up to 1 umt/5 acres ), to RM- 8 , Multiple-Family Residential District ( up to 8 units/acre) . (Quasi-Judicial) The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board ' s information . No action is needed . NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK I I PG 7 5 6 - 42 - 10 . HUMANE SOCIETY - DISCUSSION REGARDING CONTAMINATION OF OLD SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL SITE AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR LIFT STATION AND ERUS The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 10 , 2001 : TO : Board of County Commissioners THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator FROM : Joseph A . Baird, Assistant County Administrator ,' lJ DATE : January 10 , 2001 SUBJECT : Humane Societv The Humane Society operates on a ten ( 10) acre site they acquired from Indian River County , located at 4701 415` Street. Five acres of the property was purchased from Indian River County for S 10 ,000 on May 3 , 1984 . On July 27 , 1999 Indian River County deeded an additional ( 5 ) five acres . In 1991 the Humane Society was required to hook-up to county sewer at which time the County appropriated 549 ,490 in the General Fund to pay the sewer impact fees . The Humane Society property was originally the old South Gifford Road landfill , and unfortunately , ground water contamination has been found. Indian River County has been monitoring the contamination , and has hired a consultant to develop and begin remediation or cleanup of the site . The consultant Geo Syntec has assured the Humane Society that the contamination is of no immediate concern for the welfare of Humane Society ' s animals . staff, volunteers , or clients , and that with proper engineering controls , the site can be safely developed . Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County provides the community with a vital service . They had begun expansion plans to build their proposed Adoption and Education Center. The site permits were issued , land was cleared , the site was fenced , and the culvert for a new roadway was added to the current location in preparation for the building construction . After consultation with County Administration and engineers specializing in landfill remediation, the Humane Society ' s Board of Directors has made a decision to seek a new location for their building . Humane Society has found a new location that is thought to be suitable and has entered into a real estate contract for the purchase of 38 acres located on Hobart Road ( 77' St. ) between 58 `h Avenue and 66" Avenue ( adjacent to the fairground property) at a cost of $ 275 ,000 . The move will cost more than had been anticipated since they will have to replace their existing facility, and also have incurred costs on the existing site for the expansion . The Humane Society has estimated the relocation costs . A summary follows : JANUARY 16 , 2001 8K 1 16 PUG 7 5 7 - 43 - Projected Relocation Cost Property Purchase — 38 acres S2755000 Road Paving — Humane Society portion 20 , 000 Replacement of Facility — 8 , 000 sq . ft . 7565000 Reimbursement of Funds on Current Site 107 . 013 Total $ 1 , 158 , 013 * this excludes utilities cost and impact fee cost Humane Society is requesting Indian River County provide compensation and assistance with the relocation of the existing facility . Analvsis Humane Society performs an important function for the community , and because of this Indian River County has cooperated with them in the past by assisting with obtaining land and funding. Humane Society has also been very cooperative . Relocation costs of $ 1 , 158 ,013 would be very hard for the County to pay. However, staff feels that the County could be of assistance by purchasing the present 10 acre site at 4701 41 " Street and assist with the paving cost at the new location . The costs would be as follows : Source Buy Existing Site Back $ 1451000 Optional Sales Tax Lift Station Reimbursement $ 35 , 000 Optional Sales Tax Paving 77" St . — Humane Soc . portion $ 20 . 0001 ' Gas Tax Total $ 200 , 000 Total cost of paving 77" Street between 58 `h Ave . and 66' Ave. is more than $400, 000 . Other adjacent property owners will be assessed for their share of the paving. County Ordinances require the payment of water and sewer stay with the property . Humane Society has 13 ERU ' s of sewer capacity reserved and 3 ERU ' s of water capacity reserved on the 4701 4151 Street site for the current building . Based on the unusual and extenuating circumstances , staff is requesting the Board of County Commissioners make an exception and transfer the existing water and sewer impact fee credits to the new location . Assistant County Administrator Joe Baird stated that the Humane Society has a contract for a new piece of property at 77t ' Street between 56 " and 58 " Avenues , adjacent to the Fairgrounds . He asked the Board to amend the recommendation to consider having the Utility Department refund the ERU deposit funds and having the County pay for the new capacity required by the Humane Society at their new location . There should be approximately a 59 . 000 additional cost at the new rates . JANUARY 16 , 2001 8K i b Pu 7 5 8 - 44 - Commissioner Adams noted that everyone was aware that the present site was an old landfill but no one ever expected any contamination as grave as was discovered . This new purchase will allow them to expand their program . Commissioner Macht questioned whether the existing building could be put to some public purpose , and Mr . Baird responded that the only use the county might have for the building would be as a storage facility , but substantial renovations would be required . Commissioner Adams said she would be "nervous as a house cat " about sending county employees in there until the contamination problem is fixed . Commissioner Stanbridge noted that the whole area needs to be investigated but that is another subject for another day . Chairman Ginn questioned whether the Humane Society owns the property in fee simple . Wayne McDonough , Attorney , 190125 ' Street, stated that the Humane Society does own the property in fee simple but he did not know who in their right mind would buNf such a property . Commissioner Macht questioned whether there is substantial agreement between staff' s recommendation and what the Humane Societv wants . Don Wright, President, Humane Society Board of Directors , 1775 44 "' Avenue , stated that they respect the county ' s position and have a great working relationship with county staff. They have been providing a service to the county since the early 1950s and plan to continue that relationship . The Humane Society spent a lot of effort on long- range planning about 7 years ago and in 1997 began a capital campaign to build a new adoption center, continuing to use the present facility to house unwanted animals . The new facility was JANUARY 16 , 2001 - 45 - planned at 25 , 000 square feet which would have given them a total of 3-3 , 000 square feet . They have had overwhelming support from their contributors and began clearing the land in the spring of 2000 when the contamination problems were discovered . The Society could not risk spending any more money on this property and unanimously decided to look elsewhere . The Executive Committee has raised $ 275 , 000 to purchase the new 38 acres which are in a location that will possibly be the center of the county in 20 years . This facility will be something our grandchildren can be proud of and enjoy . The Society is extremely grateful for the county ' s assistance but what is being recommended will not cover their replacement costs for the existing facility which will be approximately $ 670 , 000 . They have been quoted $ 84 per square foot as a replacement cost . The American Humane Association says the national average is about $ 125 per square foot . This is a unique construction because it is dedicated to the care of animals and must be solid in the event of hurricane or national disaster . They are requesting that staff reconsider the recommendation to include costs to replace their existing facility . Shelley Ferger, 25 5t ' Avenue, Canine Community Center , stated she has been a member of the Humane Society for 15 years and is their Program Coordinator . The existing shelter building needs to be abandoned and the number of animals requiring care will continue to grow . She suggested that perhaps the existing facility , after cleanup , could remain as a shelter for the County ' s Animal Control Department . As a taxpayer and as a member of the Humane Society , her dollar is contributing to the County ' s Animal Control costs . She asked that the County reconsider the recommendation and consider its impact on the Humane Society . JANUARY 16 , 2001 ; PG 760 - 46 - Mr . Wright emphasized that the Board of the Humane Society is committed to continuing their partnership with the County but noted that the County ' s Animal Control Department represents 26 % of the costs expended by the Society . Mr . Baird then confirmed that the Utilities Department will refund the ERU deposit monies and the County will then buy , in the name of the Humane Society , 13 sewer ERUs and 3 water ERUs for their new site , or give them the cash instead . The refund amount will be $ 31 , 857 and the cost of the new ERUs at the new site will be $ 40 , 248 , approximately $ 8 , 391 more . Joan Carlson , Executive Director of the Humane Society , hoped the Board would consider sending the item back to staff regarding the issue of reimbursement for the existing facility . She believed that this is a critical issue for the Society to continue to maintain their level of service . Bill Barrows of The Moorings , is a donor to the Humane Society and has committed $ 500 , 000 , of which $ 200 , 000 has already been donated . When he received the news about the contamination at the existing facility , he began to have second thoughts about how that would affect the dollars involved in the expansion . He attended a meeting last week where a representative from the American Humane Society paid the local Society some very nice compliments and commented that it was one of the best in the country . He felt that the Society may lose some donors over this issue and that the move will cost more than $ 1 million dollars . Chairman _ Ginn noted that the Society is well - funded but she felt the County does have some responsibility to help them replace their building . JANUARY 16 , 2001 f 0 � � 16 1 OK I- 47 - Commissioner Adams stated that the building is probably worth -$ 670 , 000 and she would be comfortable , if the property could be marketed , to dedicating the proceeds to the Society . Chairman Ginn commented that the property is not marketable at this time and she understood that the County cannot make the Society totally whole , but felt that we could do something . Commissioner Adams wanted to see the paving of 77'" Street moved up on the schedule as quickly as possible . The Society should have full use of the property until such time as they are ready to vacate the premises . She also felt the United States Navy has some responsibility to assist with the cleanup . MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin , SECONDED by Commissioner Macht , that the Board approve ( 1 ) a total of $ 200 , 000 consisting of $ 145 , 000 to buy back the existing site , $ 35 , 000 for a lift station reimbursement , and $ 20 , 000 for the Humane Society ' s portion of paving for 77t' Street ; and (2 ) refund of the existing 13 ERUs of sewer capacity and 3 ERUs of water capacity from the 4701 4151 Street location ; and payment of the costs for 13 ERUs of sewer capacity and 3 ERUs of water capacity at the Humane Society ' s new location . Chairman Ginn felt she could not support the motion without additional dollars for the building . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK 1PG 762 . 48 . s o • , ." ,�}. 2� } .1„ .r � ry+9" 'Mita s ;>yf"` ,E$ "" 4,. ' t s ,'€?' ,y>t•,.:9` ns�-�, t ..� ifr �. ,�Fsu`�ky� 4 A �'T b� �T¢.� . t_','�� " 3`� .. $t, �. -. MR �.'!.' ,W"' k a, ,„ � s' � h ' 'IIS f•,M1s�.""' " £ ,w. ., .{.'" � ..��.v�r% 4,f.+d1 ? k,� iw d �."'� 3"*' ei';Uf.T.. 3:.{y. a w2w+ Ms' ''.,. „ v:a a �.'. y ?: �r w`r " sy' �� , �i'•ftr� 'w F ray + t . i rn,, +,a r _`n . i . X�So- w$. �',.' 'f .. ��.+ a, Y' e +'tw. ., ` :°� " "±1'N sat3, ` 2` „ .•t ;r .�` '" .f �, ` a^� °i •i-5 " ' "u S p=Y4#� + f? tp t s 4 S, y p = b Commissioner Tippin noted that this assistance is just a starting point . Commissioner Stanbridge agreed this is not the end but just the beginning of the k partnership . _ Chairman Ginn could not support the motion because she believed the County should have some obligation regarding the cost of the building . . t i THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the Motion passed by a 4 - 1 vote ( Chairman Ginn in opposition) . Hegel . HOBART NORTH AND SOUTH COUNTY REVERSE 4 OSMOSIS PLANTS — OVERHEAD CRANE 164 . MODIFICATION AND INSTALLATION — J. HERBERT CORP. — CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 8 , 2001 : t � . DATE : JANUARY 8, 2001 t TO : JAMES E , CHANDLER Ilk COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM : GERALD LEBEAU SUPERINTENDEI�VP WAT PODU Ilk RCTION r THRU : DONALD k HUBBS, P.E . • ' DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SER SUBJECT : OVERHEAD CRANE MODIFICATION AND INSTALLATION 1a - I BACKGROUND : Indian_ River County currently owns and operates two Water ater Production Treatment t Plants . One is the Hobart North County Reverse Osmosis Plant (RO) and the other JANUARY 16 , 2001 Q ur PG 763 - 49 - , s ' -�+� `F' ° d a� ,R w ja sr*a",'y �� :� >s `' �, .tom u� ;"mr �� w'"� � � ,�g�p 'x t'&,'°?."»" . :,yxn' 'r�` 6 ,x:. a "i#5y'' 4 di,' � jr•*;v> `.�".. . ,�:. �� a .y � . '�:"�< t ,x J � . � � � '�i.." � m � ' u' rY'. . ne tfd"• , f �c'r'NV ;� v��`#`.. ¢ y � s�.v; s •+,: rb � ked x � + b,,.,. x .. , ., ;' +� «:.+ "obi' w' : S�'y #s. ,1ww'w ,, ..., • +y � t �. e:- d" �+ .. , ,,. ' r s.�e3 o'fi. ai , a �,:. �� .ar' ^"' € "kris ' i,„ '`< n , tr� . ., x ,.,� 5w *$,£+�. ", n u y.. ^�,g",'Sx�y. w m, ,�. ' .. . ca�t•%�' ;Y.t:§ °va ,k.«^�t,.� e' suz aE't:,a , t. :. +t` ( ,.... �;�•.� . . w#: ),. ., , tr. .;,. J�=�.a, &s `,i� ,. � ,ff -x .� aa" .. _. _ . . .. :+ .F+ 'A'y�4`�$ . .t .� .'a ;:'F ,%t:•• .� =( , . j:V t 1 Y 'wv � Y.;;. i+ a Wbv-'.� +;e a. :�Yf ?P•1iie:;sS"i' � �y I M1'.: - :. --. .r.tT � .;, ' , x 'A�. :��,a ws'„ ,,�" �. k- .-.x > c. .. .,n '� s . r�e2", s, • t :'" . � ...,.. , ,. X3,9 ' Vit.. `X F b ` e" , t�, .';a x .; , 3� y � �y f' .. ,. . ��"� •, +, ma*� ':,'^'. '^� �� '�s �'f .i r�.; k�a 3<,a a..... "+ � , �' M1U i?'�i"��e ^`� •." n ., �.� , `z� ,,rz a . ;�k3^ �'? • . " k� ..�. - � - . " �� t 4 .e :. ,.�i- t$i .e„ " :w2 .. � � g,Y .ya'�,r +�`'w„r'.c+,S, ."x",�. : . }r� :, _ � � .. � . ... �'�� fr"r'.,Ss �s ^^��y �'_.`�,7�,'". .z•: ,. ., .�`. ' •... . � ,: ..ss"�"'ta". � X �-Yy�`ib.� Y'�a��satsi� ��" '�.:.,M,e. t`'�a.'�:'�s'a.��.%'i.:.?'��.cs�?"t'F?{.wt�v, n �:t "at4.t�7tx�.,+ ';?s��.�k�?'x��.:t... , a1�+;�u� �i, �:Hrd�n[5.;a�5 ",. .�. -.;'.. .a 'S %..s.� �§,�: x° .zr n'"`'rZS`:�.�i...�.�,.z� , ,U : i: x t vH* i4i ., . . b j.. _ ., '�:. � �a x . . � ... . . - a ✓ . . . ,.<. . t ,sa.'. . ._ :9 , xi x , '. .. . ., .. z. . to >�' 9; . .. ,,,., ..: ' < X ,. :a y} ... .;� �R x . . , ...s ;. ., . Sr.�i , , . . - a. 2, 4 .x. 5 ._ . 3 .,k..,. t at .� �s..« $su+ATM.r ,. 4�` ,. ,.. .> '• �.. , . art . .�s .,. Y;,+� g yh. s , .,6 a z 4.,. e,. T u ;,a=.4 ,,r i�i w. yi,� ,;,,, '>t. ft� . . _.. .t* "r:,::�f' � :g., •r: # s. :. ''?i, : � . $ .. .. +m , n . t ,s` „2 . t�,4 Y.y„�.,�x} . *,;. ,+,.,y r e.3 , 9`` k t'��„�'�`�-,. �:i�'q � ,3..,, ,, k s* C r If„gq 545 — M e If _ t being the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. The South County RO Plant has been in service since June of 1981 , approximately twenty years . When the plant was built, t the design for the motorized overhead crane was for the lifting of motors and pumps throughout the RO bay. 41 t ANALYSIS i t The Indian River County Commissioners authorized the firm of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc . to perform engineering services for membrane process optimization and system improvements on December 7, 1999 . Among the improvement/enhancement € suggestions was the modification of the overhead crane. (Please see attached . ) Item #8 S of the letter sent to the County on August 11 , 2000, states that the current overhead monorail crane system would be modified with a switch and additional length of track t to the mezzanine above the offices . The additional track would allow the crane to lift loads up to the mezzanine area for storage. Currently the Operators have to carry items F. up a stairway to store them. This is a safety hazard and can be taken care of with the modification of the current crane . When the cost estimate was proffered in August k 20009 it was with an estimated cost of $ 6, 000. However when the actual bids came in, the low bidder was $ 16 , 000. RECOMMENDATION : The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County i Commtsstoners approves and accepts the apparent low bid submitted by J. Herber ' Corporation, of $ 16 , 000 for the modification of the overhead crane monorail . The $ 6 , 000 . 00 budgeted will come out of 471 -000- 169-476 . 00 and the additional a $ 10, 000. 00 will come out of R&R fund 471 -219- 536-066 . 49 . t 41 r4 - ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the Board unanimously awarded the bid to J . Herbert Corporation in the amount of $ 16 , 000 for the modification of the overhead crane monorail , as recommended by staff. f t F: 5 t JANUARY 16 , 2001 PG 764 .f. T':,$�'�✓+tur,ii x�'s' .;ri:.,ft:, nz ,,��i.4�; xrr:s_.M -v5d 0`'a -, .x w4.z; r . 46,3..ir..4�`x53k 3 :"5.'.,2 r� :(� ea _A.� -F.55, z `r�'�'f'a.,r�r,`^:'�" '`r��, , . ,r.f yv.r. ,£5 uF'xve::..r. y ..ra$ N= 'v'+,:�v. . v Y'#�t.te6 5 •l✓.'aHI}'yesem' SF 'N h5.,`e... . � :, , ..k ,. i . . 3r ,,:•. .t az ,,, �+'�.._.�,.' � 7t"�.,; '�.'� p ,Y° � a:�"''` . 4 t4 f, z�.`x,. • ' - s°#� : �KM1 t .V4. Y't '�, t x :"e. . dl ",�o-,a-.: Ar., ex,.y„t , &,,:5„f+x d4 F.7 4 „�, . 4.;F,: "'e .,r� , ,.a .��1$ .. d`as .. . .. . ✓}", t ^M;�- : v . ;M ex'r .•.aR ; 'SdP ..t=' -�':Y x. ,. 'k&;,81?. . y ,� - 9 , 5 :. .. x• < M°/,. s' ' 2 4. =.4,,: s :. r„” Y sM .. :' lb; f v F' $,., s: r ✓ r� r � t sf �:r� h x . & E 'f° 2 S i s � tr- v� ,a G ' i' rs ��i o- y� ; ?s��e� 4#� f}* ,: w .. ry. t -s'G"' v '. G x � r -. . , A . . i3S . .. 'J ,.. :, .Jin v :A 9 {' 3 F w - . F. ,. . .nar.. . , .; . , ... . •''4`t+a( .. . 'K .. ... T 5'-. . x... ,.. , n _. ' . . ,WLv. . Ya' :, f . 9 a. . , . t• <X.. ,, ::: -} , s #h. - �,.. 'w w: - :'s h i ...-, t + x,r :. -.✓ } 'y: 5 ,..... 4m'P . ., aa. , #. .+ -,'r4�k,,.,, $' `r`.. . .. a .<,: �?� : - �$ , n . �: �: .fid , . x.. . 'r.�'- .:, . . '�'`, �: . �x�',•. : . .,.� ,<�,. e o .. s r. ,a s r,r�t a �1?; ,t �? . . .. _. . x .. .. . tsy�� .,�' � ��: � '�" a a . .4' fi>�,.mdrv» .<s. .".. ,. r: >. . .. ..- : '.�."" .. . . r. :_ Me" . .eEx. ... x.. .. ,s , .4'. .+w . . , ..1 F < .r. .. s, Jn, .4... ._.,. A .. I <`( ,, a'k ✓'t-f{ Y, �^`. y +n:2 �� .,. : - + : .w .� v,. �' � � v, z. .. . . ,. N< , . ,,J,r�` -� '�, #r .1>y T"fi . . hxxry '�1• v,,.h, $�? r z' ,. '~n . :,. v a an a :..r � .,, '�.,. ,� x?# �xF •,";*;w. .<4iT'r e �. l., l A r`° �'�� 'f' ac 4 .� �w r ¢& •�.x'u-, r,%..� a 7"s $ 3' u� , _ .,se r.. x r� , , ; s. a r 'r;r- z .zLi. •,�. '.t, „> i`.t: r >u ,.*r 'u"r � �Mw.. s.^ r , a a''' :vd e,'s} � ` .r, "d` 'r'€ �� . . `. 3 "fi„mak fu :� ' a r"`x. q "'y��Y� . ' a :.,.*amu. _ . — �§ a N=yei uz d# ,^� »t• . g? d. r � �,4y '�,�'�, 4 v x a 5 gk „ R 119H92 * RESOLUTION 2 - - OF 4 T 001 007 28TH AVENUE NORTH ” k STREET ) PETITION WATER SERVICE RESOLUTION k IV - FINAL ASSESSMENT ` The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 2 . 2001 : �. o. ,J R DATE : JANUARY 2, 2001 TO : JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM : DONALD R HUBBS, P.E., DIRECTOR OF UTII .ITY S I—'I PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS NT PROJECTS BY : DEPARTMENT O ITY SERVICES SUBJECT: 28TH AVENUE (NORTH OF 4T"ST) PETITION WATER SERVICE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW-99-06-DS RESOLUTION IV-FINAL ASSESSMENT BACKGROUND t# ' F On August 22 , 2000 , the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution III , ' No . 2000 -088 , for the preliminary assessment roll on the above -referenced project . Construction of the project has been completed . Owners have been notified and connections have begun . Staff is requesting the Board ' s approval of the final assessment roll . ( See attached minutes -ATTACHMENT 1 ) of the above referenced meeting . a ANALYSIS 4 The preliminary assessment was for an estimated cost of $ 18 , 795 . 00, which equated to $0 256861 (rounded ) k per square foot of property assessed. The final project cost and assessment ( see attached Resolution IV and the accompanying assessment roll-ATTACHMENT 2 ) , is in the amount of $ 14, 800 . 10 which equates to a cost of $0 .202265 ( rounded) per square foot . The final assessment is $ 0 . 0546 per square foot or 21 . 26% r less than the preliminary assessment. e RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners E approve adoption of Resolution IV, which is attached, and authorize the Chairman to execute same . i a- t k . JANUARY 16 2001 �1 K I �- 0 - 51 - r 4 ri w #� 5 t3Y�e. . � � V'� �r1, � L v ,u�, " .-"-' r . �$, w s, t• ».#. r ,�, . . -.<., t t-nx.,}a. 2 _. ti --. iFx <>3#.fi R ,. :.,. a ?' ;_ kr,. Pa , . .L... . X „ 3. 3-;;a i .,,. .. s. in..; �r< t '.vy,` .a..., x .. xa . .i 4?t}`o-. _,,, . t #° :, 4.. - <. ... ' a... ^ts�.:.,. r ,c c P •„ u:. r s. ,. .r ,,.x' r+: r, { t Y Y r, . *14 ss4' x "`:'. - :.. _ � . �. n t. . < ,> .:. " . ., �' „a, .�."t...s ; Y ¢,.:: � �.,, r x e , <.; �, � �% s. ;* t• .: T t.. .,r x_ v P" i... d t N s, � r� � . :P � . . r „r .v. . cFr k :: ., . .a. �;ar:. . . s.-�. ., . Y .. . .. v✓ r:,,. Av : .-,.,. r• # $ : . r a x ia� ., f ✓::i. . � � R. ,P � heti S ? :::`.: -,.. w . , ,. vnswf .+.: - a..i �"�5 a , -,r�.�. v „? „e. ;?F£'am t�3 �ir# tY' •yy, a, zz,: 'i '<x. 4 • t��i.::.. * x- , . , -..., � �x 1�^' ' s. . i. ,I -isv�v a . . � .•,.� .. . 5 ✓ :.+-# wY . . �'b tom. !;,,( '4 .., : `!, �, <,� .# !5 ,*}:, , y k :1_, �x Y rp ,;,:.s'a;. y, .: w ~•w p . pav . ¢ r k• ,,., r, Y .z:w..,^x% r `.q . „. ,£. k L. .a. rr .>k :: n +, . ...rskt- .J. ,y,... �,i., k.r ., . .rti` r ic.. ., .! , .r(n. c...,a.„�:s�..r.;',},. .^y.tM. .,�Sa, e.sv...:.hc.r.„.,-:..r.'::a.;.:.t,+ bse�5a.t<.,.r.„i.5-.<2,.. ,,..T..,:,:.: .xr*,..€...,r,7<a.. ,,M.,-+.tl`°<".,....k. r.r,^: . _.., ,. <.a:x,..,:,.r.,.r., Y*.,, .-4,i..'u”.,.,,ar,,.4,r-r:.,'•,.5:',�rE, r'e,`a.,�4 :rysx ,�`ar`3,..�.,_..�..,w:,•_ �k<,.+ n"".9 e. .. r 1�:2 .xm},w=.Wr'4t_,.=-:e...:,.;,.m«, .,c sro R:t�fc'��.Y..a`.fxi,'".,..a.-.��,x,:r:.._.: i4w}.�•��vs�,..`•.�^�,...t�«.�3..=r '�3,,�t{vs�::t• ::s:in,ifr�et^>~{'v+.� " ta "R+:.a-aa'3t�g:'.��t�^�' x�,,1?et" j}+��e 'n6vwLz ?•+a; � .y.. w . .,. . $ .:, . dw, t` . . v: yr . + u �' ,-,., w ,. ..z , s. . :. T > , ,. Y .,. s ,-.'.� i. '.x:. ,. .K €' ,av, r _ a.,. ,l".. .fig, , v .%.. $ .esu .. . x..,. . . . . .. ,.., - t .v .. -. . -, t',:'v, :<„ wx to sv r'` ".; 3,t,kv .:rim +, `s``; ;„` 4iM” c^: S , iM+ r g :'ras -:✓ a a . . : . a, ... 55 .. .,. ffi v ... Vi' ,.w.. ,. .. . .. ... , t: - e . . , , 'o : . .. �+. s .3z 3 43 n ..,.. ,5 � ,.�,? . . +rs ..v a., ., t . . x s . .x. .a :. u, t . .: . v . .. s :. s , F .,. .. ,. . s .. o .>.. ♦ � . : :� .€'P,,:.. ., �^ .�.-. xt`.. ,.. . .. . . . � , . :Ax ?,:... t';n. . . ,„ . 2 . , ,. ..s. x€ s� s� , ar � .K .=s. a . :t ,.., ., ,) x:. . a ...t~d=. +a:... ., .. �.w .: � yo--,.�`. ;. . .�.v,6 „y.z� .? f ,z:s• v.s . y r +. . l cs + S s;: . .S. ` .,• , : , . .<.�N . .A.'c "..p(a ', ' . `3e:' 3 5.. , �`< W ”. 4 :, tom.< r rryv i. :;.� #' � 8' kt p.�ES *<�}� 'Y� ." t S. ..;c ;i a r'ey,. n ' y..r t' �• , x ^� . a$,,.: .y < � ...s: , ,a ' „x. , � _ � a r z.., , a xv110 : 'r� lzN li , A F K v � t i l 4 € ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , Ilk SECONDED by Commissioner Ti m the Board pp unanimously adopted Resolution 2001 - 007 certifyingas - built" costs for installation of water `I service on 28 " Avenue north of 4l ' Street , and such other construction necessitated by such project ; providing for formal completion date , and date for Ilk , payment without penalty and interest . As Built (Final Reso. ) h # RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT' COSTS FOR INSTALLATION OF WATER SERVICE ON 28i" AVENUE NORTH OF 4T" STREET, AND SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY k SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE , AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST. ` WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that water improvements for properties located within the area of 28`^ Avenue north of 4`h Street are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county; and WHEREAS , on Tuesday, August 22, 2000, the Board held a public hearing at which time and place the owners of property to be assessed appeared before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making such improvements ; and WHEREAS , after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted o Resolution No. 2000-088, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the E property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that resolution ; and ° WHEREAS , the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual "as-built " cost now t that the project has been completed is less than in confirming Resolution No. 2000-088, NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , as follows : rr JANUARY 16 , 20011( 0 Pr 7 6 6 - 52 - : ; f ikL �yY r x»�'. r t � „ ">a r. VII 3 ri ez�. ..,a .• . .. . n :.3 u<. . - .cu ' 4>c�a.'Siv,` �i x , �.1,. = . ..,., ..., t :% .im h ;s r '-:cn s >Y 3 _ ,.. 's.. . "a.r { d^ 3. J ,'. r,T s: a :r ''s"x,,,r Tt' er-3 x,. e e- ns{ n ' .`t rm..x. P,rx ... h r: a at 'rC. ......x5 i f 9 } .g . ,. , . :..,. r✓ . ._.. -.:7 r , ,:._ , wr. .: -x 3 :%c '4 .;y e ,#"`C,:« fit. Q- q �34 .., m r x Y � .. r`.n „ .,�' . - �'vY � a�,'x�.'1:., ,_•,,:.> .; .: �F .F 'E ; -vJ' - :; $� , s, e . . .;:aa s,yr "<.;zf: ,r. � Y4r. 5 �� :#:x^ax. `^� .`» 1` n,% 3=. ' m,"" :1: .,, : :'.�>ir A .. =S 'v. :ej e ..z`.. .:y... .' , f. ;.. n < .' . ,.. : ., . . .. . ..«: , .• i .:: A..z '1 - . . ao' ,x x4",. '1N _. . M. . 'an:. .. . .: v r „ v:. . . .....3, .,i.. µ.:.. N n. .e a n u.: . . . x. . , e: n _ �u'Y• i' x v K�£ W .f. .. ✓, � P 6� ✓ . . . . , n:�+ . n.�"'R ✓n 4 r . ....p. {. q✓q!' .- np ., r . .,.:�' :. ... ,. a .. ?'4 ..4. ' ,� 4. ."C .#' - v .,.'r,:Y. . , , ."r`"'�?' , . #�'F 1 . . d . �' _ s'#;n. s n. .-,, . s .:,. � .. . ., t i » . :,:sem . . . . ., rr � ^., a- fi k-.., . . s a. . [', z . ; .r?:.. i ys. .:rP {,*a ,.4z: > ~• rrr „,�^+y- ' ry, ... . ..it . . .. . fr4"..i. „ . .ra.d � , .. '�� A`r ` z* ,,,.> r '-4 , s ....,..s .< •�� ... ... . »-.£ a 's - - '3yf rt ✓�.' P-.; A: . ^t i. "'d`.?: :., ,. :,vi vzi,4^c'a� c ° ., '". $ . ,, i' in {� $ tav"~•'. S. z�� ::w ;. : _,.., iF , -, s "� y ,. y � ., F ..__ v"` .i at "� ;, `' � � fit:•: , ?,�'' £^ �"i �J ,>�,? x4� rY : : s t . . Y s P „w' m' .. - x 7ss•,.v r <: 4 Srt* Fr ro + ' s r ,. n R- h`z A W r �., ,m,:;., . . . •., , ' 4 F n:�: ' t r «�a'a' . . �'i �' .Nr'-: s Fv i et -„ ”' . +t,, < R¢ wt r ". r2 a.. . kr vR w�{ w , k 4 v _ k 4 1 5 1 . Resolution No. 2000-088 is modified as follows : The due date for the referenced project and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is ninety days after passage of this resolution . 2 . Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8. 5% per annum may made in ten installments , the first to be made twelve months from the due date . The due date asnual the = date of passage of this resolution . t 3 . The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No. 2000-088 shall be as shown on the attached Exhibit "I « 4 . The assessments , as shown on the attached Exhibit "I shall stand confirmed , and will remain legal , valid , and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid . 5 . The assessments shown on Exhibit " A , attached to Resolution No. 2000-088, were recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County , and the lien shall remain prima facie evidence of its validity . The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Tippin and , u on bein �� & follows : P g put to a vote , the vote was as ` Chairman Caroline D . Ginn 1 . 5re Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye A Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this i F t h A day of January , 2001 . i� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: J . K . Barton , Clerk By �� J Deputy Cler Caroline D . Gi n Chairman c Attachment: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL Indian River Co . Approved Date � dntinislratlon � � o � Ltilities DS c budget I Legal Risk Alnnager JANUARY 16 , 2001BKI 16 PG 7 6 - 53 - ' ,. "z,'f✓ + 'y �a5" n ,vK m�,£' z s n w a ''.;✓ ry .i.,'. 'si „ _`_.. I >:. „' + .. , :?ss -,.. }` .a ':£ c ;.3. , .�' f2� } u � �5 t. yY Kr '• el ``4.5,,. ..P Sw� .. rk : '. k ...�. fi . : ,. ,.3 5 MAI rAv . ,�,: .� � ,.vM�?..n ,�*.' �< �"<> {P. -r •?z`", r, . 4. fi x 3v # a F '� J as$... 'k"� /r T ":f'.., S f .x . .:9 { %4 rY,ii M ✓ praR 1.' F' `}-S d 5 !`i"" arv. f , }'" fl h j:rT' % K..` 't 'Y � � v �' ff Y :9 •A :¢ )y 'y: Lf '! ,Y * y�. . g x 3!`n...^1''F*„ r x`#=kp +. ,.;.." . � .{, , r{., - d '' .. . . :.. . �y-- , �;v t f ::', U,hx,. a • ti "K �. s" vk i r . �v'-ate. x' �.tv e�•r . :"'SSL': " ,. ., y*, <, kl- 's.�e` ar .- y a it < ..r, , ..§ =r e '.'rf. 5 i': t ' tT..zff `Ka�. .7 . «. rt:Ty. x 4 �' p ,. s�, ..,,� " ..�an�.�.;c. ::5 s .,-. .: , . s.# . . ..Sk � > . . . . „z .,. _ o ;:..: w s4:E .. , �. �' 4 , ,s• x;. = as r'., � .eF. �' a '6 �' tf. t:: '� �'rF_; y � + e zr i� �, i b .,.�.-'w,e zxf >x �T3 . ' '� ^, a.;.n,.ikx aT'i_ "iz2. � ? s � ` :.: � :"� s, s .�. .:. r x �"a, , xA *: .. u r A�. } Fri 4s � sa'. �^ ✓ It "Y Sar , q . +,n^tt c�` 'iq�yyr;, x,: x,. .4F ar^ v r •d` , s �. � a � , t e E � _ t 5 g� 6y 4 tw- 6 k , Indian River County Department of Utility Services 28th Ave, North of 4th St, Water Main Final Assessment Cost IRC Project No. UW-99-06-13S Bid Bid Item Total Unit 1 Item Description Est Total Estimated °j Unit Price No. inti Measure Price Bid 60 Fi " 1 Su �sor 2 Laborers r. $ 18.49 $ 1109. 36 240 Hr. 514. 15 S3 395 . 08 3A Materials i , valves, fittings) 1 � 3B Blackhawk Si S4 797. 32 I L.S . 5285. 14 5285 . 14 3C Vero Chemical Dist. chlorine 1 L. S. 3D CSR America concrete $ 16. 95 $ 16. 95 I L. S. 27.25 4A E went - Loader-Backhoe to 115 h qp S27.2S 4B E ui ent - Box Hla le Fir. $ 18.00 ___S7_7000 I L S $462.00 $462. 00 5 E ui en t - Service Vehicle Utili 100 6 Demolition & Debris Removal Hr' $7.50 $750.00 7 Sury 0 L.S. 50.00 $0.00 8 Advertisin 0 L. S . $0. 00 50. 00 9 Permit 0 L. S. $0.00 $0. 00 A 10 Fed-X I L. S. $250.00 $250.00 1I Paving0 L S 50.00 L. S. $0.00 50.00 Force I 11i US Contingency Account (a) r, 50.00 50. 00 Est. Construction Cost : SI 1 813 . 10 Shuvev Services (a S250. Q0 Services 674 $ 1 ,408.00 Pertrhittin Services $78.00 Biddin & Award Services $0. 00 Services Davin ConsWction (a� $469. 00 Administration na 5782 .00 PRELIhtIlYARY ASSESSMENT COST : 514, 800, 10 EST. SQ.- FT. TO BE ASSESSED : 73, 172 . ' P EST. COST PER SQUARE FOOT : 50.202265 OUNDED TO 5TH PEACE) - 71 , . , Projsd - 28th Ave . , north of 4th St. Water Mains - Jan 02. 2001 ATTACHMENT 2 JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK I i 0 Pu i 6 8 - 54 - i= 54 - };+>,%,,•� '.iu h R ;`:`= tth' V+' fy ,� .7 - �' Fs.S In ;;i. 3r . ✓ .. 'C m „ „ '4:a,.z,� {�yn, ? w „ * �, sxfi, t:'.;,z' `a xC v;� rn' A ,'r.`..'s: ,,< w , t ` Fri; < rt *+." ; �i r 'y, f ° s; -'m,� '�;' Gsv '+ G "G4'"K`"' zvNrryi�.✓ e &$' , ':. ;yam'. # a3ry'✓ sv iy 1 . d xx S s,'rt tfr R..:.'r `` } . - a s g x` Rv; $ .fes e r 'z ; t `_ r» 7 x t v. ,h`.a' n =q *,`'• y , a , , - .^.;`w: yY ' fi : lx 'rt k' - 's#., §. . , i 3 p '.. t Y �� 4 " yv. <. "'ti`.. �.? -"�rc • N ; hFi€. ;.-aK� p.�f� ,zy�'.•y s _ n � . s:,` 7 � _ � .n.�{�u$ r�a rn�° ' . 4a. & 'u Iyk �' ?'✓ ,r as .,.k =". '`"-# .N, x4` 'A. S_ tl�r.�£ e %s 2'".ry+i"1,. . C'• 4 T '9 � ':Y � • <dI"'- r .. z� " . '.,'i"M1pFt j« A. We, scc a,. �9d*'A.5 � crh5 . i '�: raal #` ? as w , k g € , , ' J� FINAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 28TH AVE WATER SERVICE - NORTH OF 4TH STREET t 28TH AVS PARCFI n #n SQUARE QWNER FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT Ar 455 15 33 39 00001 0080 000 19 . 1 GANCHER 13 , 068 $ 2 , 643 . 19 465 15 33 39 00001 0080 00019 .2 SEERAM 445 15 33 39 00001 0080 00020 .0 JE7TE 13 , 068 $ 2t643 . 19 13 , 068 $ 2, 643 . 19 1191 -1 1 425 15 33 39 00001 0080 00021 . 0 COLUMBARO 13 , 068 $ 2 , 643 . 19 " . 4 27TH DR 425 15 33 39 00001 0080 00025 . 0 LEGGETT 435 15 33 39 00001 0080 00026 . 0 BENNETT 10 ,010 $ 2 , 024 . 68 ,x 10 890 $ 2 , 202 . 66 TOTAL SQ. FOOTAGE TO BE ASSESSED 73 , 172 =' COST PER SQ . FT. $ 0 .20226452741 ROUNDED $ 0.202265 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 14 , 800 . 10 '•; g 1 /2/2001 J . D . C . 6' 28THAV2 6 w : 4 z > E ; JANUARY 16 , 2001 i PG 769 - 55 - q. K k Y%55 � 2"• 3 � ' ate' k t ...�,' n.. 3 ,.� 3`S e+ � +1s' '"° fir' `:'.c L, z ..k, 'i'x '` s `;� �` #R� ��i 3h•. -'�F,�As' s 15� z+ ,� }S a a �§y a x K�r+k � i { `� � r, :, P " >�. � {� . x=�`+' '.'" wen � � y a i'�aa 3` &z ,, rc' ��,z" �# . �." * ��•. '�+ : let r.'v a§� .#' '._'.� t �> k� . 'vp'"'#fi �� , , F , .�, . r . • ,� : ;� � ��: �� ,? `;r -€ � ��, c� tib,, �� < _ '.<v:ge, a ''s'.;k+ '�y '*a �i.° 'x `��.;�" .,* ., '}'n •<'�.�, $u�; ' da•"wz.: . ,, v ' �'..� z ; r�nA=�" +�... . i.p3 " 'p; ✓. k f � z' y , a � , . ,: ,; dw a °, . . . � >., , .��rsr�'��p „� � ri"YS � jr;..� x� �� " �rt� � � YS .+ � �; € s' $:� �'' i �✓.3f #f.. s�'' : w , ..- . . ,. . . : k, ,_�, : -_,;� . . . ;c, .a� `�' � ;�c. � `�a`t , K' `+=a. ,w t"i >.6 «ii,3'✓.., s sx.+`�.`_. `.: °., . e , �� r z �: .�a ,�e, w` ` .*' a +�' .^�,µ^% �, ` . , a iso ' x. t r. : F. "� ' . ,. s . � ,`` i = .P« -; •,,,..:.- �,x : . : '? W� - � ,.,, ', . _ r. S , , � .,. , . . . �;, s � - ,: 9 ;., �, � cr s'F,. . -:. .. ., `''"kar<., ':"" , . . ,. � . ..+ , �.. ��v"-``.; rkr�"•. �Yxx . �-, � � '� , '�n ..S'' z,: 4 ',r �2�',��i � a - au;�-" F,: - � '�+. r a � ur* " it ,. nt , a � '. IL , FINAL ASSESSMENT - 28TH AVE WATER SERVICE JAN 2 , 2001 PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00019 . 1 SQ . FT. 13 ,068 ASSESSMENT OWNER GANCHER, SUSAN M 2,643 . 19 455 28TH AV VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2034 LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 , RUNS ''' 1 W ON N LINE OF SAID TR 8 , 25 FT TO W RNV LINE OF EMERSON AVE . TH S ON W R/W 995 FT. TH W 555 FT TO POB TH W 60 FT. TH N 5 FT. TH W 73 FT. TH N 150 FT. TH E 73 FT. TH S 15 FT. TH E 15 FT. TH S 11 FT. TH E 25 FT. TH S 35 FT, TH E 20 FT, TH S 94 FT E TO POB ( OR BK 625 PP 2829 ) PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00019 . 2 SQ . FT. 139068 ASSESSMENT OWNER SEERAM , RABINDRANAUTH E & JANET 2 , 643 . 19 465 28TH AV VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2034 LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W ON N LINE OF TR 8, 25 FT TO W RNV LINE OF EMERSON AVE . TH S 990 FT. TH W 615 FT. TH W 73 FT TO POB . TH N 100 FT. TH W 112 FT. TH S 100 FT, TH W 15 FT, TH S 55 FT, TH E 87 FT, TH N 55 FT, TH E 40 FT TO POB ( OR BK 656 PP 681 ) ' PARCEL # 15 33 39- 00001 0080 00020. 0 SQ . FT. 13 , 068 ASSESSMENT 2 ,643 . 19 OWNER JETTE , LEON J & ALMA P . -, 445 28TH AV VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2034 LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W ON N BNDRY LINE OF SAID TR 8 25 FT TO W RNV LINE OF EMER- SON AVE TH S ON W RNV LINE OF EMERSON AVE 990 FT RUN W 615 FT TO POB . RUN W 113 FT RUN S 55 FT RUN W 37 FT RUN RUN S 42 FT RUN ELY TO PT 100 FT S OF POB RUN N 100 FT TO POB . AS R BK 83 PP 190 a PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00021 . 0 SQ . FT. 139068 ASSESSMENT OWNER COIUMBARO , RAY 2 , 643 . 19 425 28TH AVE VERO BEACH, FL 32968-2034 LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W ON N BNDRY LINE OF SAID TR 8 25 FT TO W R/W LINE OF EMER- z SON AVE TH S ON W R/W LINE OF EMERSON AVE 990 FT RUN k W 615 FT RUN S 110 FT TO POB RUN W 150 FT RUN S 100 FT THENCE RUN E 150 FT THENCE RUN N 100 FT TO POB AS IN R BK 42 , PP 421 . LESS SLY 10 FT & ALSO FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W ON N LINE OF SAID TR 25 FT TO R/W LINE OF EMERSON AVE THENCE RUN S 990 FT RUN W 615 FT S 100 FT TO POB . THENCE RUN W 150 FT RUN S 13 FT RUN ELY 150 FT MORE OR LESS TO PT 10 FT S OF POB . RUN N 1 FT TO POB . AS IN R BK 67, PP 20 4 : 4 k JANUARY 16 , 2001 8K I FIG. 770 it - 56 - ,adtr, . .. . .. , , � w . w:e � � ^"" u,..: 't. " .,r � " 't4" , a ' , t .. �+��,r, ,-` e ...sva"' e� s >.'..:, .. ,.b >n,. ," '�'y . �, at, t ry , . �: 4"'f +,r si•,:�+ -'.. . �*i , , 's. .t , $ . .� m . > . . ,.;::;, t�k� ;w ,. ��.& � .:. ....r . .� +� , ^€' fr?i ,st i,.... ». w ��;�,¢e, � s�„'x�p: , ' . E : 2", • , "fid` -•2:: ��r £ ��m ap,.: . . " . . � s µ,�'tl'�z'� � 3id,:sf+e 5 v�? daxr z, �"�M� 2,.. ;vs;�.h. ,.�i �'5 P`A� ✓��n M :rE a � � v�. e � ^`� :;�43. "�:' � � 4 . �v- `T��,� 3 � t ,t a } 4 �; . . .: : . .. ,s.:: � d_ x. ! , .. .,x " >. F rx . u „ .s, . ,.. F »a � . SsY :. ,"-�`.x'da. a .,a K. . , .s�'S.+ ,,. : to �.;, •: _ ;7 .. ,. '_ �,.» :'�.. -a.. xi�., K - , :< . :. . . Yy. ... .t ,§'. . .. .:. e 'Y - , r -�:. .,, � , :+. 9. `F. , ,. i N sn,.f, 44. ..., t. '"#+i : 5?. „. �, ,#✓ E r� , . . w:: - < -a".�•. r . ,,.. , : : 1, : . r1 4 r ,:t .. f«.. ,. _ . , t. ,'x.. i�� "9,: , °..c r',.. .. s.4 {" ,:`. "wr:,. . cx `3f=- •::�:a t''„ a; a�-=+. S . ter. k � ,HSS { i 5.E'r ,; . t. s _ x ,:::. + &ya - .. 'aty -si: r' ; :L,`-: ' 'r + 5 , r...,,. 'Fwr` ;,.$ rrx " �^ y,#' { e}� •�:s;:< x+v' + >w $ evar, 'w. y yr, : a P.,•� }3=;`x f� 4y, }�<� � i !` f�` , f . , , - .. .,: .. � '�.S.x. , q-.s � ',¢*"$� xF � r" s2m ., 4. 3 t'k va 'kg -•¢fie kyr �„ yh'k . :,� � :r a .. Mjwk 'x „ae"3t t a, x ,^� ITT 4 p is W *. 9a. T ^ rr v .^ If IT # r :. „a- `#a as* C , 'a:xh "a #!e 4>Y{� r � €q i 5�3 �'pwl .`^s r : K es Xif All if TT , . . P _ PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00025 .0 SQ . FT. 10,010 ASSESSMENT If OWNER LEGGETT, DOROTHY C . COOK 2 , 024 . 68 III 1932 26TH AVE VERO BEACH , FL 32960 LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W ' ON N BNDRY LINE OF SAID TR 8 25 FT TO W RNV LINE OF EMER- " SON AVE TH S RUN S ON RNV LINE 1100 FT RUN W 480 FT TO ,,..( . POB . RUN W 110 FT RUN S 100 FT RUN E 110 FT RUN N 100 FT TO POB . AS IN D BK 110 PP 30 , LESS PARCEL AS DESC IN R BK 179 PP 128 ( OR BK 367-468 , 449-624 ) r PARCEL # 15 33 39 00001 0080 00026 . 0 SQ . FT. 10 , 890 ASSESSMENT 2 ,202 . 66 OWNER BENNETT, DAVID N . 8 PATRICIA A. Ilk* 435 27TH DR VERO BEACH , FL 32960 ,'. LEGAL IND RIV FARMS CO SUB PBS 2-25 FROM NE COR OF TR 8 RUN W ON N LINE OF SAID TR 8 25 FT TO W R/W LINE OF EMER- SON AVE TH RUN S ON SAID RNV LINE OF EMERSON AVE 995 FT RUN W 480 FT TO POB . RUN W 110 FT RUN S 99 FT RUN E 110 FT THENCE RUN N 99 FT TO POB . AS IN R BK 116 , PP540 4 ` t _ ' TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE k 73 , 172 TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $ 14 , 800 . 10 1 /2/2001 ' J . D . C . 28THAV1 k- IT q 4l A k: E- kl } JANUARY 16 , 2001If I 16 FIG 771 IT w - 57 - I 57 -o- f. 3'p;Y {=R,ti, ay x :". Y R . r,'" lyy+a .S.. ` 'v:,€ a',.h=.>.�..,�4. fi�4. .5a.. . , .. ... . (s .> ,!k,._. v�`, �s.•.,^` ;.'. ,..� .,¢ g,. ,.... , }X'i,y`'r'r'i.�' ...ry.,?,r...:zw, .L „*..'i`r..+..a..tt<...�...a.g.ta } xti,�zXq..?,.',}.. ...,,<...a�'3;.,a..�+L§`,�sE,.,..x'.-:.i...f„:_..,z... ¢,.�.-�tM "k a.,"t.,5<G,a-.. ,r.....,�.,,.#.x sn5 q svA��.,?.:....i.., ? c'� sr..§, d,<.:'.-..,.-i:. ,� �.mv ,=yf,,>.�m'*'".Pr.r'+.'^x;�'d r�x• 2„ch2a,.;c. ,rr t`@ tl.�';:s.yx..Y�-'.v:..•v..�.,s,:rTx �`f n. v,,aF TOM v 3 .,f. 't,• . ? x .. '{?� ra +: x„ C , 't?a' v ., `n, +...;. fi ,f a .,; `S5"' x "a "k _ , <,y f. s; `�,. .%rya,' „rx .`,'i Gf” t;'. , .-�,4 ''�}• r2, a a ': ,, rsr...Y, 'P� '�nY, rr., .`n „zt, w r � _ �' ,. _ , '"" ,^fix E �, x, . , ;:: +.'sk' �' ,'.i't. •�3 4 e z�' 't' , # .r. , •r�',i k r ,. a _. � ,: , , � <. ai:.- . x: . �` ,`�` p,, rs � n � ,:e.. : a, 3 ,, �*.r� i' ,..,4�� r^», ,<.�'�r• wt' �, �;, xk � �a.F. 1� t ?fir F�.,: ;�e� • ' fir' , � , „ � viz aar , is ' >., x. .,� ,.�c � :` �� '� 7a« :, m �.,. $$,�,��.4 . ., ��^ �, ,.a , , ', ,,y{ �^. _ .,j,... x su.��•:h' r.;,g'A^•' a-. ..,. , .Ys : ..: r . . _.: a ft+ :,:e s ?£ � .., ....r: � .� s'�,,.,, 'v�• Ws,. 1 � a."&. ,� x # -�*. . f ; 4 „ .,-�*. , to w5 > ,4 e.A of 3a � v . .§�. h �^ -. .� , .a .._,� r ,X ::.F ,,,3 z } ,.t, fx` .^{i° � .. ✓ s '`«`� .�, rz r.�^^ter "`*:e ��?k i, 'vt r.�^ 'f ~ £-�h �"' n, ' 3 :. ,s.•_ xr .fir? . - , . Ya.,,__2 `•51iYsmYfa 4 � x ,.,,_,,: �a�. � ,a�'�.,. rx .< t .:.��.w�' A ,s:.n. A.a.4.. `'1% ^','tx�i- „�� e .,.na. , Er<.k»,�-',,... ^, . f....- .bx �°"'r,. '. . �5'rr�'z.ss#h`iriv,.n:.r'�„u e��`3wz:-.,+.zz'?k'�,'"�"3.i..:�3:? .�Ltk-t5�-' .,.,:. .. � ;�'kc ;.^:"ra:.s .. a.S::�S:;�,r t , . ,. .. .. .'-v' .. . . ,, _ . . ...zsr+•.vm .. ,. ^`z 'r .,.��Y£ ^r ,. ,.^ ut z., �;' T 5±,.}�.,/.r+N . s .., e °x ,£+ ,. ' �.z..;,, . � d k `' ` lr `yr.'s. , ' .. ,a7, z.. . :,}. •„s- 4 . ?"-2 „ . ,t rr� a , �?�..: .m �. +. ,, + �k. : . . ., . €� �s , ,:✓.. .. ...,,. r r., .L,..;N. ,:t a .,. .._ ,. . ,�.. r, +tt ^, • ... � ' - ,. wk . .; a,. '� �• $ , sm...^� a3 .. .,i h n. i'. ar_ : ::�r ay .r ,,v+. x S, TSt" . z :,. . ;,o .., ,u • '- -'' ` ��.: � < .x? � s .. ,. . ,,. „ .. -�;, +. u �. . . .,r ,. . . - .. ,�. .' : :^ � .� x > ;:.; +. r ,,... .. . . . ..,:< r _ .. . . "``�. ....,.. x< . . ..: fir.. , r .. � 4 ,.. a' L �,,.,... . �.z=,• . x' n ...} °�.,.�.. . 'i - v. _, .�. . ) c , . ,. . . , �: .. ''3' -.ai�$''�.` , 5 ^E''Yr ;. . 4 ',... � rb: '�,>+T.-:; f,,, 4r�,.'. dk� F� ,?_ 5 'rII� 3 � �� "Af� §.ti �{ ,�� c :?�. �^ Jvw �9s-'$?,T�'#., !�';�'��* +�,^ t Y �'+C.a E u• +°-y+e. ��,.!' � ,s. `k'4k45£':"� , :?.: �, • .,.. i . H. , . +`"a* . ,. .i ,� .:r' 'y.' k ., :, :va + i . . . v. � f x b c l: 13 . A . CHAIRMAN CAROLINE D . GINN - REPORT ON VISIT TO G . PIERCE WOOD HOSPITAL ` ^ 1 The Board reviewed Chairman Ginn ' s report on her visit to G . Pierce Wood Hospital � p with City of Vero Beach Councilman Craig Fletcher and Jean Kline of the Health � . Department on Friday , January 12 `' t Tuesday , January 16 , 2001 Report on trip to G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital Friday , January 12 , 2001 Commissioner Caroline Ginn , County Health Administrator Jean Kline , and City Councilman Craig Fletcher traveled to Arcadia to tour GPW, * Staff welcomed us , and were very professional in their approach . From the outset it was apparent that their main concern is for the welfare of their patients . * Number of beds : 380 * Number of beds currently filled : 308 (Extremely disabled patients ) * Safety incidents at the hospital have been reduced . (Evidently this has been a problem in the past . * GPW serves two ( 2 ) populations : 1 ) 13ack up to local services , and 2 ) long term care . * Approximately one third of patients return to families . * The buildings are old barracks dating from the 1940 ' s. Because of their age and distance from one another , all efficiency is lost . The State has " tortured " buildings into providing a mental hospital . There is no electronic surveillance equipment for monitoring and/or ingress/egress . * GPW staff has done their absolute best with what they have . While old and in need of sprucing - up , the interior of the buildings are clean , pleasant and without odors . * Grounds are in need � of maintenance and landscaping . There is a staff of 50 persons responsible for maintenance . Seems excessive . a JANUARY 16 , 2001 SK I PG 772 - 58 - e„k-., .. � . . . . w , , . . ,. .. ..z ,,, � Yi4 y '' S4 "4 i i � 't Lh fi- 3 'i fi �"Y„y t##y5 5A:i"v . .P kp . ;\{i f• it :_ , . >^..u. :�•.., . L . ,.,,.y.�i�.. :. s ,ke's. . .h;,F_. .,?� 4ia +."+^. ... .. i 4 . ,..xb t ,. ;; �� c: . ,�S +*: r' , m' . .: °a .. - . :... u t't } i:., kr rt� kv^ s '#'+ ;�. `b' ,:;�„r c 'f2 > �. - . , ... ' . � . .. . . ^: <f , ,.. ., .i'. • : a ..1A�:# :t x . . . +�v "`, ..� _ -. - s. C s , ., ., ,�`- ; v."*t , Y:.,v'*, J :., ,M c - y- ,Si'>n W"w�• ,� "+ '. , l .,�:n., �..A's. > w S�:>.. �xn w. . . . z +'.-< E •. 5' h:,:. o > ., S . n ,,:„.. r � ,'t. :-„ > t . . v�-,rr*e,�A_ .. � t n ,.+�. ,. 2 4 ,. rt , r.S v, .� �xY/; ,:s +"" '^ a `€ �. ,fSr`'. .?x `.. r '+. a•, s , _ d n` ,s JJ ,tet 4% , ' #�• ,�'. . .. . . , ., a . 'z... > . 4, .. . tt '.; 'k t i ..,:.5 + , `�"a ...;. n zrd ii! +t .:. �* . . � . .. ,.v., rc3 -_ ., 54P, / �h i &, . . iq :£^ s n.,„ „ .' :.�- . , . r Lar .,. 1t i".kc �`' r.±•a - , �+ "3.. F :, N. , ,:,�. rz::: , b. , m'`' gr �'�"~§ :. , 'r-�r 1 * J,i. rr. �'t ;h,. �.: d y ,„. *ii. 5r?;wk4.m :_ . �. . r� . rr", . ry .$ :h Al .t ,. F 4' , n,s., .x .:.• a .s, 5 z, • . ' .. . ,.,,._. � . ..>r� ..... % '•~>� = a Y , ?. ., zE , ` z. , 4.: a- €> , 3} . >• + , , .3°�.r n ., , �” t i '�' . yak .e t ,+exT:.^ . . Asn` .x ... . .. .n �:' •* . „a ; : :.'. } _ ';k k wr „-" a e ':.+. , :;. r x A r, t + : ,s:W� s ail,: t a,y: x ,ss,. nvyS`71E ':. L ,. & :. F '104 . . . .. 'Y;� f., �,.,.,A ,.aJ „ u.S, • , ^" z- c .a- . :,.. . . .� ,, . . ..v.: . +rt.. a f „ „.rZ a y. . . . a :. x ., ,,.. ...- F' xR S aY ,y,-✓ , w r,:: - m-'^ ^ ;,. - P+w',# Ck ,.,. .¢ ,, , ' 1x Y .. ';it . . ,.. . 8 a�,i%`.,3zr" .) P v .. n�,r 'i* ra. ✓.: . Y ,v t .h,.. . . . .., , £rr`.�., a .i" : *. .t,N c . ^y a �2r . tC-s t ;. s �: v , , .'* t,,z ,i b a ^i -,r ,v. �Xr G,,, , . . t, . te. _' . h , •. . ,.. � t„ °., 4' _a F . .., Y,r � 4 � � � v �. r +.' a fiary x ;. � `kh ?r � - �T'` s'£'.«'.' yb° - z` a J.x, " � a "+ ,: E k h 4 .tet' Sys �3r r rr 'A ^ 4 4. * GPW patients appeared to be well cared for . * Staff seems genuinely interested in the welfare of their patients . They also appear to be very caring professionals . * It is obvious that staff would like to see the facility remain open . HoweverIlk , we came away with the impression that they know closing is inevitable . BECAUSE OF THE AGE , PHYSICAL CONDITION , AND LOCATION OF THE BUILDINGS AND THE LACK OF MODERN SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT RESULTING IN AN INEFFICIENT OPERATION , EACH MEMBER OF OUR REVIEWING PARTY (Ginn , Kline , Fletcher) CAME TO THE CONCLUSION , INDEPENDENTLY , THAT WE SHOULD NOT OPPOSE THE CLOSING OF THE i HOSPITAL _ RECOMMENDATIONS Ike 1 . The closure of the G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital should not be opposed . 4 _ 2 . Because of the fragile infrastructure local ) for mental g y patients , it is our ` opinion that closing should be delayed until local governments can accommodate those patients who will be served in our county/district . * We currently have no group home in our community . ` *There is no guarantee of apartment accommodations . *The County's SRT would not be in place or staffed . *Training is essential . ( *Local "drop - in" centers need to be expanded . *What of the elderly mentally ill ? Nursing homes will not take them . * We have been promised 5 additional beds in our local crisis stabilization unit in Ft . Pierce . Funding? When operational? *Indian River County will be receiving money for a 15 bed SRT unit . This will need to be in place with trained staff prior to closing GPW . * We need a clear understanding of who will be responsible for the patients' medical costs . Many , if not most , mentally ill patents have chronic health problems requiring a great deal of medical attention . For example , heart disease , diabetes , osteoarthritis , obesity . What I impact will this have on our local health care providers/Health Department? * A health professional will be needed with knowledge of the interaction between psychiatric medications and medications for other illnesses . *Dollars have been promised for a second FACT team , but IRC has had difficulty organizing one FACT team . JANUARY 16 , 2001 �, BK P 7 7 3 - s9 . h . "'(i�n hen •.: w `,�y �^'tcur,� 4 gxs -' } z� .� Sfi'�-.� a' z `� a .yb :. k` . v. x s ., y �r s�-�' x §r. d �✓✓#� , �` a.: . �' „ ;y'}� -t; .� . a. rS a y .,, # z s` ." �^ a '. „ ., ai. ,+ w y. .e . +. - : :;e 0 ,sx:•2 ft, 3 .s.zr ay x". 'a- b,.,>r r+:: C "':S 3 w '3 ..tt 3' r t. t s.. ' dt.a:ar -u -Yri` N , a '">r rt, :,? _ �., , .' r fr �..xP ✓ � xc. . a;.; ,> ik .. , u.:..^..'°,z � t .. . ., ,,-z ;. � -'. , ::: ..v "': .. >tr,:; , 5 .�.,; ^ ,Yw - � 4 xA4 k �. ,:. x ,+ =*'- 2��., 0 � -`x r 4"� . G,.:. sr =sr�x, , ,��v.. z 3` .� f .. t .. u rr A , . ,t 4 •.i S.S ha �+' , .� 't,. n. s Y ,..'. TWO wn , , ,. ,:z , .. •: i.. -...:.M._ , '. �r , ...'� '#z" r c t `y U z� z ., x� rrz �rj b x , � ,dt� 'S+ r 3.,. .i a ,� r... '. *„ .v . -s . ,,_i: .: . '? `-l..s:. ..,.. �J, :r".?. G .. 'qi a ✓ e,. �.� l,t . 5 f ..s� sx.krFt' i, air E ,ir.' ft .. �- �1•A $�` '` tk s '� �gFS�Ff'k9 .k,s � h^<. .' � 4 �� x x /,."' ;• w y h t%'t�"f";3" s� . R , ter � x � fi• . �E � �e � � � ztft ;" +s ^ra -� ` r i i' ¢t, ft *Indian River County needs an implementing plan to accommodate those we will have to serve . Without a well thought out plan , Patients will suffer and the community will suffer . M 3 . The County Health Unit has indicated that at the present time there are i people in our community who are in stages of de - compensation who will end up in crisis and be back under Baker Act care . Without a clear indication of where they will be treated , they will end up in our jails and/or homeless shelter . ,; I I 4 , Funding from the State is imperative . R 5 , The remaining mental hospitals (South Florida/Jacksonville ) need to gear up for additional patients . Jean Kline , Administrator of the Indian River County Health Department, stated that they spent the whole day at the facility which originally was a British military base , taken over by the state in 1947 . She had been there while she was in nursing school and it has not k changed much in the interim . The facility is very dilapidated and in poor repair . They are i down to 308 patients from over 800 . The staff was very warm and receiving, compassionate and very open with a high level of concern about the readiness of the communities served to take over the care of their patients . They have discharged over 50 % of their patients in r4 the last 6 months . Some of these had been there 20 to 30 years . They expressed concern about visits from family members to the patients and felt the move will seriously affect those visits . There is a tremendously high cost for health care for these patients and our community certainly is not prepared to receive these individuals . G . Pierce Wood Hospital serves our 4 - county area and the Department of Children and Families ( DCF ) is just beginning to organize FACT ( Florida Assertive Community Treatment) teams . These teams need to be up and running before any patients are received . Our community has no housing , educational support , occupational support, and no medication plan in place . She felt the closing should not be opposed , but must be delayed until support services are available locally . City Councilman Craig Fletcher, 2345 Avalon Avenue noted that this was very traumatic experience for him to see the conditions in which these patients exist . However JANUARY 16 , 2001 ' 1 16 PG 7 7 - 60 - E �y `yi v .: ," � 'S. .1.,Y., f , .�V `x u£q S 1 . . W ' �:. „", r..., Y !'i r ➢x#.. 4+'� . , fide.}-. ,R.y,. ,rk«'^+r � V; ," 17 sC. atW F'>Y^ai='�*' '. `,,'J, p., 'ro-nn.., . r , = ? .<. ✓r,. M t Xz t'; :,.. z "' r :" i - xwka ' . . e .z s § `5 A' ry a,rx+4°3 F ✓ q^ 2;£ ,3 . :�,� yir n i .: x .:r < .s.. '�. `u t "�2 v �M'�'4,. ' i`1 ..p ';k' h ... �. , . 2 . 1, + , r s 3 ;f. T"" •,,y ri, .rY k .,^ �. .`]Y: Y.v Y' f� :=> a�t x ,te t...',£ti• �,t,,3,��.,'t.i q 3 t� - . ,'ds` Cr. !<^ { " >,:tx.3`�"vyd. � ., v "M: „�'F a :. n_,C '. Z .s x,x4+: ..!•, + � t htr ,. s�'"e ::; i E4 ) "'$ _. d + .m*vs ., me.�' .�., mop, > r-`.y y' "' r, wFp . a,4^TM, z� + >!`° R„u r r .3d. ,p, .'i 1' 's ; �` x ^c tk :.,..{�rx^' .Mi I% s" t L iFa � . a. i�*fi n, } .,''f. ,ks t'�a.a,tP I.Ly �_`?_'a.Ltii� * yY C{^S y..>n..y:'`}".ms' s `"u�a;.,v3a�'�t.�ea1 k2a r �w ,c ' S t " , .'.r+g�r:S 1yy±y�`t"`t.r..x<.x . `.z. y�.ate" . Y �z 1,+�."''`"F� 'efrE ♦1i«zc w $yv y s "4 r,: ," xt ,.>•?^.ys c xx"+tY#. "�^:-: xv'� �°`� ,{'�, ',��*.,1,2�'"xs 'X�ytS,"Yv fw+t`"�'x..::5�°' irfr,:a�.� J,r a ✓' r EVI , Ml , „ aa-aall,�: 7-1 F ' k t b � F e t bad those conditions may be , it would be even more horr - A ing to turn them out without a system of care in place to take care of them . These people are the least capable of taking care of themselves -of anyone . We need at least a 2 year delay in the closing to prepare locally for their care . He will bring this matter before the City Council and asked that everyone contact their congressman to ask for assistance in these preparations before moving ` these patients . Chairman Ginn wanted to take this matter to the Legislative Delegation on Friday . 4 She did not want to oppose the closing of the hospital . The patients are well - cared - for but the building is old and lacks modern conveniences . Mr . Fletcher emphasized that they have a great staff at G . Pierce Wood , they just don ' t have enough money or the proper facilities . t Commissioner Tippin commented that he had visited G . Pierce Wood 5 or 6 years ago and was amazed at the smiles on the faces of the patients . They all appeared to be happy t there and they absolutely cannot take care of themselves . Chairman Ginn recommended that a delay in closing be requested from the Legislative Delegation and a demand made to insure funds for local communities to deal with this situation . ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin , SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge .. the Board unanimously approved presenting the matter to the Legislative Delegation , not opposing the closure of G . Pierce Wood Hospital but requesting that such closure not take place until local infrastructure is funded and in place . JANUARY 16 , 2001 G PG 775 - 61 - 7=7 MqV'e,77 Y � , r (. 'r;. ¢ _} .. q it t t r � ,` ' ' � �^ �p ;,� • Y7�a '♦5 ,�. 3t`' `+:*r'o^ti4 ':�'� ' r. ...,P{ x * #.� + x z w x . x i^ } r £"'v i�s, � h M `8t ^''' ?rr '✓ s.,ri fi"�v: r ... ^`.'1c' s tk v, f s.'t st E, ! `t s 2 ,y iu m " t .�' . , f t. a x r. .xyt; 1;x , < . �. , a. -, rte. . . „ ax > , ., � . ... , r, s3 �.., r yyr��$'` i'Syi yY'. x �< „, ca•a^3 [ '. s(Y + 1 f 3 iV, I I' , f rs x ?- .t t ;•?G S :a `r r Y: c x t t xI f {+sYs �x �g�, lN ` , Y' -k 'SicY $ :'� h: ' ' "&tJ_« "�Is`�-4 ? yli*"_'✓s.`'^Fi' SS�, Sk# P1SV�X+{, Z "?r ° a'eFYfdFa*a , '3iaixL3 ♦ YA ' va,'x 3' Y . 1 , t 4 13 . D . COMMISSIONER KENNETH Re MACHT — PRESS s JOURNAL ARTICLE CONCERNING CLOSURE OF V TRANSFER STATIONS (DEFERRED FROM MEETING OF JANUARY 9 , 2001 ) The Board reviewed a Press Journal Article of January 8 , 2001 entitled Proposal to close transfer stations raises a stink: AGENDA - ITEM 13 . D Indian River County 82nd Year - No. 119 ■ Jami S. 2001 ■ 40 Pages. 4 Sections t MONDAYt � , q : Proposal to close transfer stations RAISES A STINK A county consultant has suggested shutting landfill - 1 transfer stations and replacing them with mandatory curbside garbage collection . But many officials and homeowners are dumping on the idea . . Commissioner Macht wanted it known that he is a municipal taxpayer and has mandatory garbage pickup . He is also a County taxpayer and has to maintain the transfer stations . He hoped that this discussion could continue and expressed his opinion in favor of mandatory trash pickups . Chairman Ginn noted that will be one of the recommendations when the master plan is considered . The Utilities Advisory Committee expects to bring something before the Board in another month or so . NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN . JANUARY 16 , 2001 BK I 1 '0 PG 776 - 62 - 1-IX 62 - Y a<. '"`r" i > F f ",�`.'n,�r tiYc F' 71 T� I IrN' . . 4'.L 72 57 TI L r �'�;�., f^' s 3s �"•;,4..` ' ' s x 3.s�ry es h a r r - Y 4 e i x'y ss s +� f?' {Y'k' r "E � c { l` a Y x S - mm y. TInf V- r t low z-,.,'-.{ `�' ui- a' e ,py 4 t 5a I `' a �' ,, +.fTM.'s ,,. N' ',. � := � 4, s . s,. - ` - .+4 v �, t 5 #F, .. -sl n R x - - . . , x ,- S`r 'S , p 3 ss ; 't'' p ' A* „sr's<ai ` y zsse,'A :� ' . s Z IT L 14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT None , 14 . B . SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment , the Board would reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District . Those Minutes are being prepared separately . 4 p 14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD None . There being no further business , on Motion duly made , seconded and carried , the Board adjourned at 11 . 57 a . m . ATTEST : f J . K . anon , Clerk Caroline D . Ginn . Chairifnan Minutes Approved : IJ JANUARY 16 , 2001 FG777 - 63 - 44 57 } roff,tF YS�i v, I ;'Y Y.IT IIa- x3z K z O w f ;i t ,r Cir �d nny+t 2 - .�" fi Ft V + 4 _ - - d .� hK•i t( '� { VTILI 4 z { y $ ° Gwe c s S IT IIf 3y 111 ITI c a r s "vyk " s