HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/23/2001 n. v. . . . . L n u.. ea".V 6 i . rt bi
.,,. . ,z7.. . . r . . r ."x5;. .a ? '£s .
.. . . .L . r nk'"nY ,. . 'rrf. ,..x „ Fx ,. _.x.
dr'xS; . . ,+. . F : ...
,+: : ,. is..<.. x ; , :
' k, , . ,. � � � t,r .v.
x= r*' ,rx> u
`7" ei _ tit :r .. r .;..,n
�. :, ,+:.+_' s•. ..r.. ,y.. rM. ",,. r ti'xt a , {.^c.z.„ . !)`'*'e :?M* x . r•+ .... u.. ! ,. v x.s:: '
? < . ,.-a ,``v" u 1 + �+ k. a .:t r A 4t sI r c ..v'.
,+ .,+� , r,:x . ,.. sc { s . f.. , F a d ,r '. f.
. :fA. :. .. �. . , {,. .3.:A . } tI. .,- .. � ,.� a - :x*'s.': ,7 _,e,� i ' : Hx , ,..I v �,.
L . m) I, e 3 _ ,.2.. Y�
:z r .e. �e' r ;" c w , vry ttr, §i` r k �'' �` 2,{', a ` , r a
'� r k.. a � • , ..,' :,,# ., . <. �,.^..,t „ .: .. 'ey' . t� ,. a�t ”,
C � "r e, . : E ✓ : '', � :. ta '� „». . � '�=' *: , ,3
Ilk
fr
t
MINUTES ATTACHED f
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY , JANUARY 23 , 2001 - 9 : 00 AsMo
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840251h Street , Vero Beach, Florida 32960
E,
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
k
Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman District 5
Ruth M . Stanbridge , Vice Chairman District 2 James E . Chandler, County Administrator
k
Fran B . Adams District 1 Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney
Kenneth R . Macht District 3 Kimberly Massung , Executive Aide to BCC
John W . Tippin District 4 Jeffrey K . Barton, Clerk to the Board
,
BACKUP
9 : 00 a . m . 1 . CALL TO ORDER
PAGES
2 . INVOCATION
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm . Kenneth R. Macht
4 . ADDITIONSIDELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
44 ADDITIONS : I I . H . Arbor Trace Development, Inc . - Developer ' s Agreement for Proposed
10 - inch Force Main along Oslo Road and Proposed 6 - inch Force Main
along 43 "Avenue
13 . 13 . Lost Tree Islands - Agreement for Settlement Scheduled before the
Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund ( Governor and Cabinet)
DELETE : 7 . 0 . Annual County Fair - Agreement with Indian River County Fair Association ,
Inc .
5 . PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A , Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000
B . Regular Meeting of December 5 , 2000
7 . CONSENT AGENDA
A . Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board :
Delta Farms Water Control District 2000 Audit Report and
State of Florida Annual Local Government Financial
Report for FY 1999- 2000
BK 16 PG 778
ti
n. v. . . . . L n u.. ea".V 6 i . rt bi
.,,. . ,z7.. . . r . . r ."x5;. .a ? '£s .
.. . . .L . r nk'"nY ,. . 'rrf. ,..x „ Fx ,. _.x.
dr'xS; . . ,+. . F : ...
,+: : ,. is..<.. x ; , :
' k, , . ,. � � � t,r .v.
x= r*' ,rx> u
`7" ei _ tit :r .. r .;..,n
�. :, ,+:.+_' s•. ..r.. ,y.. rM. ",,. r ti'xt a , {.^c.z.„ . !)`'*'e :?M* x . r•+ .... u.. ! ,. v x.s:: '
? < . ,.-a ,``v" u 1 + �+ k. a .:t r A 4t sI r c ..v'.
,+ .,+� , r,:x . ,.. sc { s . f.. , F a d ,r '. f.
. :fA. :. .. �. . , {,. .3.:A . } tI. .,- .. � ,.� a - :x*'s.': ,7 _,e,� i ' : Hx , ,..I v �,.
L . m) I, e 3 _ ,.2.. Y�
:z r .e. �e' r ;" c w , vry ttr, §i` r k �'' �` 2,{', a ` , r a
'� r k.. a � • , ..,' :,,# ., . <. �,.^..,t „ .: .. 'ey' . t� ,. a�t ”,
C � "r e, . : E ✓ : '', � :. ta '� „». . � '�=' *: , ,3
Ilk
fr
t
MINUTES ATTACHED f
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY , JANUARY 23 , 2001 - 9 : 00 AsMo
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840251h Street , Vero Beach, Florida 32960
E,
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
k
Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman District 5
Ruth M . Stanbridge , Vice Chairman District 2 James E . Chandler, County Administrator
k
Fran B . Adams District 1 Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney
Kenneth R . Macht District 3 Kimberly Massung , Executive Aide to BCC
John W . Tippin District 4 Jeffrey K . Barton, Clerk to the Board
,
BACKUP
9 : 00 a . m . 1 . CALL TO ORDER
PAGES
2 . INVOCATION
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm . Kenneth R. Macht
4 . ADDITIONSIDELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
44 ADDITIONS : I I . H . Arbor Trace Development, Inc . - Developer ' s Agreement for Proposed
10 - inch Force Main along Oslo Road and Proposed 6 - inch Force Main
along 43 "Avenue
13 . 13 . Lost Tree Islands - Agreement for Settlement Scheduled before the
Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund ( Governor and Cabinet)
DELETE : 7 . 0 . Annual County Fair - Agreement with Indian River County Fair Association ,
Inc .
5 . PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A , Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000
B . Regular Meeting of December 5 , 2000
7 . CONSENT AGENDA
A . Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board :
Delta Farms Water Control District 2000 Audit Report and
State of Florida Annual Local Government Financial
Report for FY 1999- 2000
BK 16 PG 778
ti
'.,s.A, z.
,4.
�' W lY,w lrwkaM r -•',, 4: '��`
.ef,Mra `� .:.fft.'k``*''
>s
,
*3
."- # .. n-:. ac ,r} � w .. ,..,,. , . ... ,s.�. ,M :, �^ , � . ... :.�
. ,.v ,. . . �'y,n �'u = �, rN .,,3 v,. ., a �, -, 3+:... . , ,k �.x�: . , m :#r. w,.
i f''.h *.�"�" rv�4,�
- .k „ r`°
Tr� t'* yr a, €a ' e �:zsry `�' s<, 's`*'t:. ,. C"«. � s', ,Nr,- xs)�'- h -,::,n, , r+.'?."d "�'w .ia tw. -
9M ': �6 �"�.'. $ � 's..F: r •. o-�h :'Vs: v -.
-• � . -; � r ,�=,: _ ,. , �,n �� . . '�S : .. . ��" "::�- ' , 'r. . ,. � "'�f` S, �. "` ��t� . .... _,s`
`k,. r":- �« W�. �-`"��"ax �� ",.: gam . ...�::,
Mie'
k... ^. ; � , . , . ,. R 'g` ��.'# Tx u`.. xY ,�',,. � k.L,�,.. '� c u, .:�r , �'.t`�: zr�S� z
�x�` 1 'td ,. �X,s� x���..*w �--,� »rtr �:�,
lb r ,�, h aN ✓x . , h �a%sl; ,—c F d. f ti pn , 3 4?`- fn tt�� iy
Ie
le el
le
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont ' d . ) : PAGES
B Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated January 11 , 2001 ) 1 - 9
Ile
C Golf Ball Agreement Retrieval
(memorandum dated December 27 , 2000) 10- 14
1 D . Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement
(memorandum dated January 12 , 2001 ) 15 - 20
E . Bid Award : IRC 3009 Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects
of four (4 ) County Lift Stations — Utilities Dept .
Ile (memorandum dated January 16 , 200 1 ) 21 - 30
F . Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal
(memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 31 - 34
G . Proclamation Honoring the City of Fort Pierce on their
Centennial Celebration 35
H Indian River Boulevard Construction — Phase IV
Release of Temporary Construction Easement
(memorandum dated January 12 , 2001 ) 36-37
1 . Beach Preservation Plan Pre-Engineering Design `
Release of Retainage — Phase I
(memorandum dated January 16 , 2000 ) 38 -41
J . Kennedy Groves , Inc . Request for Final Plat Approval for
Old Orchid Phase 11
( memorandum dated January 8 , 2001 ) 42 - 52
K . Raymo Inc . ' s Request for Final Plat Approval for "River
Lake Estates " , a Replat of Tract A Copeland ' s Landing
Subdivision Phase I
(memorandum dated January 15 , 2001 ) 53 - 57
.b L . Request to Pull Letter of Credit for Pelican Pointe Phase Il
(memorandum dated January 12 , 2001 ) 58 -65
M . Heron Crest Development Corporation Request for Final
Plat Approval for Heron Crest Subdivision
(memorandum dated January 15 , 2001 ) 66 - 75 "
8K i _ - - -
. , kp,n<S '#:✓^, v' `£T -. _ `xs
, uv ,;.Gib r , ., .x,,.. n t xar!
.:*Y, +, -*=1 „ „ e s �'�" � aac:. 4 `� ,x .e.. ...
5 �.. �.. ;. aw: :a:�.y ,. 4 . .. r ... .
,, d ,. ;. .'r f'#- , !*J•. ,�'".F.9 t.� ,- ,,, r,:, ap .. ,z?' ^ ,�' r . . 4. x x-e'
,
Rs^ ,z... u., � GG
=: «,, .:,.
:. . : , ,.. . ro • . ...r: s . `�
. � tn r �' s• '� � v , : .... ,. ,rr. . , ,, '� r3§z�.*., h. z �.tg4 sN w .a
i ,
"+.
., T•'.:. - .. g- �. ? gs- -r,.m. f.J `S°wa £% t , `b 'f'{h ,<. ` 4 « . w ! "€ « ., c rer
F1 *.., 3 ,.ry:,+'". . tis s "' .k . k. >r.:, g°nL ,. t
., e , .. .� � ;,tl .- 1. _ '�f ,,. .7 ,fir:>^,r , .. Ft r rz' 9a.,.:�. .�• am ,,,. '�a' ,,.x..nT' �. ..'k E'�
a'-u . �I:d 4`r'>' ,xi,q ,s ', „ t.,kv '� � .z wa., c. .n '.re�, , m �' Z h t{ . ^. s° +
. s -
w
, : } . ,}:4. :v . : v �..� .:, . ,;.. [ .s.. . .e. s ys ,<_ , ts,�. ..,.� .� ;a ., } Y' :.a t
� .¢. . S ,.r '.,., �r v, ga; $,r , fi'`:,*,, - 3 au ..:�""` G, ;': 5 �a1���zu .v ry*", 5, ' ' 3't • a-Y' L ' et >
y 5:. '� � . ,+. .. . . s�, ., 1'*.. ..,.. ,+�,�a a,�.'*3^ „ . r S , rt r:, ,x a" .�, r z . ,:. d `S
x k$•. � &q{...t', Nr$ <. ':.±',.'* t. "t�ztr k -za m. ;a, £.s t�21.k ,z is �
" Y�`i:` t �'«�.S.a#�..,• 'tnY,��`<x�'�ax"xN'i.i,Yc .a,. .. �'`".x^e.3`�s„5 ,":r '',:,,rs ,-.e 4`�;Ciz 7.';", . �.. �;.»W, ,
s'` �' s<, v�, w4 .s K 1s�..�'.", e ii=b'i�'R� . ,*.:i fx."`! .�;RJid`�'ta�` itiiSe"z . x. . 3 rs, ;�.� >5`'. ,`..
'.,s.A, z.
,4.
�' W lY,w lrwkaM r -•',, 4: '��`
.ef,Mra `� .:.fft.'k``*''
>s
,
*3
."- # .. n-:. ac ,r} � w .. ,..,,. , . ... ,s.�. ,M :, �^ , � . ... :.�
. ,.v ,. . . �'y,n �'u = �, rN .,,3 v,. ., a �, -, 3+:... . , ,k �.x�: . , m :#r. w,.
i f''.h *.�"�" rv�4,�
- .k „ r`°
Tr� t'* yr a, €a ' e �:zsry `�' s<, 's`*'t:. ,. C"«. � s', ,Nr,- xs)�'- h -,::,n, , r+.'?."d "�'w .ia tw. -
9M ': �6 �"�.'. $ � 's..F: r •. o-�h :'Vs: v -.
-• � . -; � r ,�=,: _ ,. , �,n �� . . '�S : .. . ��" "::�- ' , 'r. . ,. � "'�f` S, �. "` ��t� . .... _,s`
`k,. r":- �« W�. �-`"��"ax �� ",.: gam . ...�::,
Mie'
k... ^. ; � , . , . ,. R 'g` ��.'# Tx u`.. xY ,�',,. � k.L,�,.. '� c u, .:�r , �'.t`�: zr�S� z
�x�` 1 'td ,. �X,s� x���..*w �--,� »rtr �:�,
lb r ,�, h aN ✓x . , h �a%sl; ,—c F d. f ti pn , 3 4?`- fn tt�� iy
Ie
le el
le
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont ' d . ) : PAGES
B Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated January 11 , 2001 ) 1 - 9
Ile
C Golf Ball Agreement Retrieval
(memorandum dated December 27 , 2000) 10- 14
1 D . Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement
(memorandum dated January 12 , 2001 ) 15 - 20
E . Bid Award : IRC 3009 Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects
of four (4 ) County Lift Stations — Utilities Dept .
Ile (memorandum dated January 16 , 200 1 ) 21 - 30
F . Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal
(memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 31 - 34
G . Proclamation Honoring the City of Fort Pierce on their
Centennial Celebration 35
H Indian River Boulevard Construction — Phase IV
Release of Temporary Construction Easement
(memorandum dated January 12 , 2001 ) 36-37
1 . Beach Preservation Plan Pre-Engineering Design `
Release of Retainage — Phase I
(memorandum dated January 16 , 2000 ) 38 -41
J . Kennedy Groves , Inc . Request for Final Plat Approval for
Old Orchid Phase 11
( memorandum dated January 8 , 2001 ) 42 - 52
K . Raymo Inc . ' s Request for Final Plat Approval for "River
Lake Estates " , a Replat of Tract A Copeland ' s Landing
Subdivision Phase I
(memorandum dated January 15 , 2001 ) 53 - 57
.b L . Request to Pull Letter of Credit for Pelican Pointe Phase Il
(memorandum dated January 12 , 2001 ) 58 -65
M . Heron Crest Development Corporation Request for Final
Plat Approval for Heron Crest Subdivision
(memorandum dated January 15 , 2001 ) 66 - 75 "
8K i _ - - -
. , kp,n<S '#:✓^, v' `£T -. _ `xs
, uv ,;.Gib r , ., .x,,.. n t xar!
.:*Y, +, -*=1 „ „ e s �'�" � aac:. 4 `� ,x .e.. ...
5 �.. �.. ;. aw: :a:�.y ,. 4 . .. r ... .
,, d ,. ;. .'r f'#- , !*J•. ,�'".F.9 t.� ,- ,,, r,:, ap .. ,z?' ^ ,�' r . . 4. x x-e'
,
Rs^ ,z... u., � GG
=: «,, .:,.
:. . : , ,.. . ro • . ...r: s . `�
. � tn r �' s• '� � v , : .... ,. ,rr. . , ,, '� r3§z�.*., h. z �.tg4 sN w .a
i ,
"+.
., T•'.:. - .. g- �. ? gs- -r,.m. f.J `S°wa £% t , `b 'f'{h ,<. ` 4 « . w ! "€ « ., c rer
F1 *.., 3 ,.ry:,+'". . tis s "' .k . k. >r.:, g°nL ,. t
., e , .. .� � ;,tl .- 1. _ '�f ,,. .7 ,fir:>^,r , .. Ft r rz' 9a.,.:�. .�• am ,,,. '�a' ,,.x..nT' �. ..'k E'�
a'-u . �I:d 4`r'>' ,xi,q ,s ', „ t.,kv '� � .z wa., c. .n '.re�, , m �' Z h t{ . ^. s° +
. s -
w
, : } . ,}:4. :v . : v �..� .:, . ,;.. [ .s.. . .e. s ys ,<_ , ts,�. ..,.� .� ;a ., } Y' :.a t
� .¢. . S ,.r '.,., �r v, ga; $,r , fi'`:,*,, - 3 au ..:�""` G, ;': 5 �a1���zu .v ry*", 5, ' ' 3't • a-Y' L ' et >
y 5:. '� � . ,+. .. . . s�, ., 1'*.. ..,.. ,+�,�a a,�.'*3^ „ . r S , rt r:, ,x a" .�, r z . ,:. d `S
x k$•. � &q{...t', Nr$ <. ':.±',.'* t. "t�ztr k -za m. ;a, £.s t�21.k ,z is �
" Y�`i:` t �'«�.S.a#�..,• 'tnY,��`<x�'�ax"xN'i.i,Yc .a,. .. �'`".x^e.3`�s„5 ,":r '',:,,rs ,-.e 4`�;Ciz 7.';", . �.. �;.»W, ,
s'` �' s<, v�, w4 .s K 1s�..�'.", e ii=b'i�'R� . ,*.:i fx."`! .�;RJid`�'ta�` itiiSe"z . x. . 3 rs, ;�.� >5`'. ,`..
3 fr�
- `^ S x °'.e ..S'k. l r2. x ,: } Si r+i '%' ,rr .. ,,: ..,. r. :. 'aT < n!; :
, ss : ° � r, - ' 4d - 't i 'a.:ak ♦ ! €
.x°'^ d
/' .. If
BACKUP
7 . CONSENTYAGENDA ( cont ' d . ) : PAGES
N . "John & Anne Tschinkel Request for Partial Release of Ease -
ment at 5730 Turnberry Lane (Bent Pine Subdivision Unit 3
and 4 )
(memorandum dated January 17 , 2001 ) 76- 81
O . Annual County Fair
(memorandum dated January 17 , 2001 ) 82 - 85
If
114
- 14
114
8 . CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
If
1 . Forest Lake Petition Water Service — Resolution III
(memorandum dated January 16 , 2 00 1 ) 86-99
2 . Frank Baratta ' s request to rezone ± 32 . 36 acres
from A- 1 to RM - 8 Quasi-Judicial
(memorandum dated January 16, 2001 ) 100- 117
Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1 . ALPI (Agricultural Labor Program Inc . ) Representative
ntative
Angela Davis , will speak about ALPI services
(memorandum dated December 15 , 2000) 118
k
2 . Michelle Sims , Tobacco Prevention Coordinator —
Request for Board support of Students Working Against
Tobacco of Indian River County Tobacco Prevention
Campaign
(memorandum dated January 10 , 2001 ) 119- 120
3 . Utility Reimbursement Request
(memorandum dated January 5 , 2001 ) 121 - 126
co PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S MATTERS
None
W1W R .,r r 2ew s1 ;:?. t :.-# 'r .x, z ,::. . xi : . sn ,s«
rt flay y a.a „: . :. r .+ ) .. a. , .!. > � ,'ee7 M!` ,Io- ' w`. . :b, r r. ,,4? .r.. .%r , P
^=' 3 k=„ },� ,.' . ,. . ' .: a s M.,�!.m.F re .. 5, 11 . 4v t ,< i . ,. .: baa,,. a. n , °=- :a :4 r G, .” .v
. .,.`r ..z� '{S`.,t l :j "e^ MS 3 , '. ,t m"b y. tar . ; 4. . .. . , ,, ` r S:'` ;+.r r`#w
:.� , b v 'x 4 � :ex'.; a . .¢ .": >u. .,. .;.. "§v`+, x^ r, " a x c `�k �" � ,e'h,, � ...n-^4'b,,. "' •'a '�' f..fi`e>i� H
' k , ,s„mh.. Vit.. . �r � ? S � "v< z '. ;k.>�. ��E, .,�" .a,. a �;., , ,yf '
r .n 7 . " �"4 "' ,ax !, 'ei.: . s.a..... ?
4 '�S,.m : r. < F sem'„ ,wc.,. s�' ... . >a{�`t' < �,"�. x`2 tom` '�..� z - -
'�s „s`c ,� �.: , .. n �r'5r,; ` tS-. ,+:�,-, e ,. A s. :. d-
.�. .. . , ', a.,+ u�.,s�+a'2.�+. �.. ._ �a� � ax S`r.,.;,. ,i'... .� t ,-„m . .,. .., . wAxa . . a .. := , shS" .:x, wx�rr _..b._3. 3 nt€-. .,:'r,.a_z
.x•. .v��",. ���c. 3 „ s2;', .�.1�'nvSi ea .,. - ..,.Y..3. '°$f^w.`i� ,. ._?:_ c .. . , ..-.. . , , ..,�., .
3 fr�
- `^ S x °'.e ..S'k. l r2. x ,: } Si r+i '%' ,rr .. ,,: ..,. r. :. 'aT < n!; :
, ss : ° � r, - ' 4d - 't i 'a.:ak ♦ ! €
.x°'^ d
/' .. If
BACKUP
7 . CONSENTYAGENDA ( cont ' d . ) : PAGES
N . "John & Anne Tschinkel Request for Partial Release of Ease -
ment at 5730 Turnberry Lane (Bent Pine Subdivision Unit 3
and 4 )
(memorandum dated January 17 , 2001 ) 76- 81
O . Annual County Fair
(memorandum dated January 17 , 2001 ) 82 - 85
If
114
- 14
114
8 . CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
If
1 . Forest Lake Petition Water Service — Resolution III
(memorandum dated January 16 , 2 00 1 ) 86-99
2 . Frank Baratta ' s request to rezone ± 32 . 36 acres
from A- 1 to RM - 8 Quasi-Judicial
(memorandum dated January 16, 2001 ) 100- 117
Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1 . ALPI (Agricultural Labor Program Inc . ) Representative
ntative
Angela Davis , will speak about ALPI services
(memorandum dated December 15 , 2000) 118
k
2 . Michelle Sims , Tobacco Prevention Coordinator —
Request for Board support of Students Working Against
Tobacco of Indian River County Tobacco Prevention
Campaign
(memorandum dated January 10 , 2001 ) 119- 120
3 . Utility Reimbursement Request
(memorandum dated January 5 , 2001 ) 121 - 126
co PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S MATTERS
None
W1W R .,r r 2ew s1 ;:?. t :.-# 'r .x, z ,::. . xi : . sn ,s«
rt flay y a.a „: . :. r .+ ) .. a. , .!. > � ,'ee7 M!` ,Io- ' w`. . :b, r r. ,,4? .r.. .%r , P
^=' 3 k=„ },� ,.' . ,. . ' .: a s M.,�!.m.F re .. 5, 11 . 4v t ,< i . ,. .: baa,,. a. n , °=- :a :4 r G, .” .v
. .,.`r ..z� '{S`.,t l :j "e^ MS 3 , '. ,t m"b y. tar . ; 4. . .. . , ,, ` r S:'` ;+.r r`#w
:.� , b v 'x 4 � :ex'.; a . .¢ .": >u. .,. .;.. "§v`+, x^ r, " a x c `�k �" � ,e'h,, � ...n-^4'b,,. "' •'a '�' f..fi`e>i� H
' k , ,s„mh.. Vit.. . �r � ? S � "v< z '. ;k.>�. ��E, .,�" .a,. a �;., , ,yf '
r .n 7 . " �"4 "' ,ax !, 'ei.: . s.a..... ?
4 '�S,.m : r. < F sem'„ ,wc.,. s�' ... . >a{�`t' < �,"�. x`2 tom` '�..� z - -
'�s „s`c ,� �.: , .. n �r'5r,; ` tS-. ,+:�,-, e ,. A s. :. d-
.�. .. . , ', a.,+ u�.,s�+a'2.�+. �.. ._ �a� � ax S`r.,.;,. ,i'... .� t ,-„m . .,. .., . wAxa . . a .. := , shS" .:x, wx�rr _..b._3. 3 nt€-. .,:'r,.a_z
.x•. .v��",. ���c. 3 „ s2;', .�.1�'nvSi ea .,. - ..,.Y..3. '°$f^w.`i� ,. ._?:_ c .. . , ..-.. . , , ..,�., .
MIR q n
'F :^ ' o- wi>"'„ Cdr€ ..- er d x.� : : n :!, .. ? - ; ,u ., 3 Y I, ,.:`v. x .a
xi , Ad
. ,t. . ' . -. `v`3, 3., 5;... 'fx•.- n ,.fw ..k
>•a 4 .,� , . s
v . . P :.,e 2 zsi`r '^ N
w u. ., r t � ✓
,.., r . Y. . r _ <i. .: . r5 . .. v , ,..s'✓- _ .. .. ' . § . � °&1� �'-tx
y, e,'�: uY ,xx a3
�. .
c `,rs
a
u
x , >t-..
f. >s =sw:
xo- 5.d.; ..N ' o-✓,.. a
L� _ .. , 9`v - ' . , ..c.
ky e.u .M....7'* .0 < :... Rf . ., .Y nkc., 4*y t ,L . Ti a4�< Y r') ✓
"' n+. : "-s*°. < kt ,R-t �
--iwdt , . ' x„
-MAN"r E. , . . , . .r�. 3'4 .
Fs
i a ex
NQS 11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS BACKUP
A. Community Development PAGES
Board Consideration of CRC Development Company ' s
Request to Pave Old Winter Beach Road South of
Jungle Trail
(memorandum dated January 16 , 2001 ) 127- 145
Be Emergencv Services
None
Ce General Services
None
I Ilk D . Leisure Services
None
Ee Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G . Public Works
1 . Kings Highway Phase II — Feldman Property
(memorandum dated January 9 , 2001 ) 146- 162
2 . Developer ' s Agreement — The Colon
P � Y
(memorandum dated January 9 , 200 1 ) 163 - 173
He Utilities
None
I . Human Services
None
12 . COUNTY ATTORNEY
Nextel South Corp . v . Indian River County ; Case No . 01 - 14005Civ-
Paine , United States District Court , Southern District of Florida
(memorandum dated January 17 , 200 1 ) 174
13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Caroline D . Ginn
3
PG 7 81
3
S-, g
5 ,r „£r d •.a M1 h
.} -
74 i t £ k sx
+, I i. rx ;.
." '.= r s
a sr:F
3 'uR.t Y� 'a..'•d.'.aT,.w i r 2a'h^' E' '=i 4Eo4 t"F E "P R r a: U4 h .E X 6. t
,x ,,,a{ n ., v4 ,.t4, .:Y Tqr' 3' ,
v y��
if
k . g*_5S �s f' �' Sx ♦ S '
?
1, -
,"�r -
-�. .;,
MIR q n
'F :^ ' o- wi>"'„ Cdr€ ..- er d x.� : : n :!, .. ? - ; ,u ., 3 Y I, ,.:`v. x .a
xi , Ad
. ,t. . ' . -. `v`3, 3., 5;... 'fx•.- n ,.fw ..k
>•a 4 .,� , . s
v . . P :.,e 2 zsi`r '^ N
w u. ., r t � ✓
,.., r . Y. . r _ <i. .: . r5 . .. v , ,..s'✓- _ .. .. ' . § . � °&1� �'-tx
y, e,'�: uY ,xx a3
�. .
c `,rs
a
u
x , >t-..
f. >s =sw:
xo- 5.d.; ..N ' o-✓,.. a
L� _ .. , 9`v - ' . , ..c.
ky e.u .M....7'* .0 < :... Rf . ., .Y nkc., 4*y t ,L . Ti a4�< Y r') ✓
"' n+. : "-s*°. < kt ,R-t �
--iwdt , . ' x„
-MAN"r E. , . . , . .r�. 3'4 .
Fs
i a ex
NQS 11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS BACKUP
A. Community Development PAGES
Board Consideration of CRC Development Company ' s
Request to Pave Old Winter Beach Road South of
Jungle Trail
(memorandum dated January 16 , 2001 ) 127- 145
Be Emergencv Services
None
Ce General Services
None
I Ilk D . Leisure Services
None
Ee Office of Management and Budget
None
F. Personnel
None
G . Public Works
1 . Kings Highway Phase II — Feldman Property
(memorandum dated January 9 , 2001 ) 146- 162
2 . Developer ' s Agreement — The Colon
P � Y
(memorandum dated January 9 , 200 1 ) 163 - 173
He Utilities
None
I . Human Services
None
12 . COUNTY ATTORNEY
Nextel South Corp . v . Indian River County ; Case No . 01 - 14005Civ-
Paine , United States District Court , Southern District of Florida
(memorandum dated January 17 , 200 1 ) 174
13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Caroline D . Ginn
3
PG 7 81
3
S-, g
5 ,r „£r d •.a M1 h
.} -
74 i t £ k sx
+, I i. rx ;.
." '.= r s
a sr:F
3 'uR.t Y� 'a..'•d.'.aT,.w i r 2a'h^' E' '=i 4Eo4 t"F E "P R r a: U4 h .E X 6. t
,x ,,,a{ n ., v4 ,.t4, .:Y Tqr' 3' ,
v y��
if
k . g*_5S �s f' �' Sx ♦ S '
?
1, -
,"�r -
-�. .;,
4a>as „'£r. ' �X Yrr 4 , :'":;a"z i „r-3t 1. r;r V .. Yi �•:.- ,.,ti` f t . `' .: r ,.:?
.as' -
L � : ty+ ! ,{+ wf 1 +. r-b�:•' ¢. .. 1 T ncili
It
, 4 M r�:
f ..yy-^ ' <re ''��. } r�, .� - "4 1 rei�' aY, h '. } 3 { y`' Ste{ ✓.y5 bfli r { t
h'i . . cJx' I to tyt. � r:#,'m z✓ #` '} 5r.'u g 5 ,t 'a^_-.. s , ztr r� A+ . - k 'r"
; Y . r?J '', ;.F., `?
m
;j, < � a £ 14 'a , o- ,.� _ :? 4! : i. Z •s...: a�, „c� �£�� �. "?�'"���. r's3 5;. (�a�`a';� ',w . � h'�i
. YNR �,�3 ��o-� 'i ¢d;`,.�. .y �'<"(a fa r'.
4T +,
v
n
n � s
�t
13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont ' d ) • BACKUP
Be Vice Chairman Ruth M Stanbrid e PAGES
Co Commissioner Fran Be Adams
D . Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E . Commissioner John We Tippin
F. Committee Anpointments/Reappointments for 2001
and Filling of Vacancies
(memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 175 - 183
14 . SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
Be Solid Waste Disposal District
1 . Approval of Minutes — meeting of 11 -21 -00
2 . IRC Solid Waste Disposal District Convenience
Center Evaluation and Improvement Evaluation
(memorandum dated January 8 , 2001 ) 184- 195
Co Environmental Control
Board
None
15 . ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
n
upon which the appeal will be based .
I Ib PG 782
1
� ,Nr,x �s"'xr r H� ° b rt , z z. z # -cM1,. s v< , ✓ ..
te I,
,i F. 'av -:� _ r ' Y :<' r
jY '" r• 3� ��a dv, aK �� ff � � ya x , `P' s '` _ Y4{uf ':k ', r :. V r +
< rY _ s t ,<
. _.; , ,i .>, . , . . . ._ a _ . . . . x _ , a _ r .. , , > , r
. ,. . .. k_ ,t :.
r
4a>as „'£r. ' �X Yrr 4 , :'":;a"z i „r-3t 1. r;r V .. Yi �•:.- ,.,ti` f t . `' .: r ,.:?
.as' -
L � : ty+ ! ,{+ wf 1 +. r-b�:•' ¢. .. 1 T ncili
It
, 4 M r�:
f ..yy-^ ' <re ''��. } r�, .� - "4 1 rei�' aY, h '. } 3 { y`' Ste{ ✓.y5 bfli r { t
h'i . . cJx' I to tyt. � r:#,'m z✓ #` '} 5r.'u g 5 ,t 'a^_-.. s , ztr r� A+ . - k 'r"
; Y . r?J '', ;.F., `?
m
;j, < � a £ 14 'a , o- ,.� _ :? 4! : i. Z •s...: a�, „c� �£�� �. "?�'"���. r's3 5;. (�a�`a';� ',w . � h'�i
. YNR �,�3 ��o-� 'i ¢d;`,.�. .y �'<"(a fa r'.
4T +,
v
n
n � s
�t
13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont ' d ) • BACKUP
Be Vice Chairman Ruth M Stanbrid e PAGES
Co Commissioner Fran Be Adams
D . Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E . Commissioner John We Tippin
F. Committee Anpointments/Reappointments for 2001
and Filling of Vacancies
(memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 175 - 183
14 . SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
Be Solid Waste Disposal District
1 . Approval of Minutes — meeting of 11 -21 -00
2 . IRC Solid Waste Disposal District Convenience
Center Evaluation and Improvement Evaluation
(memorandum dated January 8 , 2001 ) 184- 195
Co Environmental Control
Board
None
15 . ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
n
upon which the appeal will be based .
I Ib PG 782
1
� ,Nr,x �s"'xr r H� ° b rt , z z. z # -cM1,. s v< , ✓ ..
te I,
,i F. 'av -:� _ r ' Y :<' r
jY '" r• 3� ��a dv, aK �� ff � � ya x , `P' s '` _ Y4{uf ':k ', r :. V r +
< rY _ s t ,<
. _.; , ,i .>, . , . . . ._ a _ . . . . x _ , a _ r .. , , > , r
. ,. . .. k_ ,t :.
r
All
xs1 ' t r 4 y ti e `€ x
ler
k
.-P:�• .-> .. ��AAhar� ?} .,:fir. + �+, _ . 3�'^"s, ,.� s � r ez > .a?d: a. wr. v ��,«.y Sv .,. z� :
� . i
57d�n'�k �a`'v
a ,
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County ' s
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567- 8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting .
Indian River County WebSite : http : //bccl . co . indian-river. fl . us
Full agenda back- up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library , IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1 : 00 p. m . until Friday morning and Saturday 12 : 00 noon until
5 : 00 p. m .
h.
Bid ! PG 733
Ic
Ij
k Y k 3f
All
xs1 ' t r 4 y ti e `€ x
ler
k
.-P:�• .-> .. ��AAhar� ?} .,:fir. + �+, _ . 3�'^"s, ,.� s � r ez > .a?d: a. wr. v ��,«.y Sv .,. z� :
� . i
57d�n'�k �a`'v
a ,
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County ' s
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567- 8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting .
Indian River County WebSite : http : //bccl . co . indian-river. fl . us
Full agenda back- up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library , IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1 : 00 p. m . until Friday morning and Saturday 12 : 00 noon until
5 : 00 p. m .
h.
Bid ! PG 733
Ic
Ij
k Y k 3f
4
S
.i e s �. ����,7 r �� � { } *,, a>k'° � � �� ti '^*r wJ �' a � ��-'e � � . '^3 N- �.. m y a 4 +, a :•:
$ s.e a » ` i ' e 1
-_ INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF JANUARY 23 , 2001
i
1 . CALL TO ORDER . . . 1
2 . INVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
4 , ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5 . A . PROCLAMATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 21 , 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 2
6 . 13 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 5 , 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 2
7 . CONSENT AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
7 . A . Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
7 . 13 . Approval of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
7 . C . Golf Ball Agreement Retrieval Contract - Sandridge Golf Club - Tom
Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7 . D . Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement - City of Sebastian . . . 13
7 . E . Bid Award # 3009 - Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects of Four ( 4 ) County
Lift Stations - J &H Waterstop , Inc . /Roe Construction , Inc . /AJV . . . . . . . 14
7 . F . Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 15
7 . G . Proclamation - City of fort Pierce - Centennial Celebration . . . . . . . . . . 16
7 . H . Indian River Boulevard Construction - Phase IV - Release of Temporary
Construction Easement - Riverfront Groves , Inc . f/k/a Crazy Woman
Properties , Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
7 . 1 . Beach Preservation Plan Pre - Engineering Design - Release of Retainage -
Phase I - Applied Technology and Management , Inc . I . I I I . . . . I . . . .
. 1 18
7 . J . Kennedy Groves , Inc . Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid
Phase II - Contract for Construction of Required Improvements . . . . . . . 19
1
BK I I PG 784
4
S
.i e s �. ����,7 r �� � { } *,, a>k'° � � �� ti '^*r wJ �' a � ��-'e � � . '^3 N- �.. m y a 4 +, a :•:
$ s.e a » ` i ' e 1
-_ INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF JANUARY 23 , 2001
i
1 . CALL TO ORDER . . . 1
2 . INVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
4 , ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5 . A . PROCLAMATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 21 , 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 2
6 . 13 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 5 , 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 2
7 . CONSENT AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
7 . A . Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
7 . 13 . Approval of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
7 . C . Golf Ball Agreement Retrieval Contract - Sandridge Golf Club - Tom
Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7 . D . Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement - City of Sebastian . . . 13
7 . E . Bid Award # 3009 - Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects of Four ( 4 ) County
Lift Stations - J &H Waterstop , Inc . /Roe Construction , Inc . /AJV . . . . . . . 14
7 . F . Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 15
7 . G . Proclamation - City of fort Pierce - Centennial Celebration . . . . . . . . . . 16
7 . H . Indian River Boulevard Construction - Phase IV - Release of Temporary
Construction Easement - Riverfront Groves , Inc . f/k/a Crazy Woman
Properties , Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
7 . 1 . Beach Preservation Plan Pre - Engineering Design - Release of Retainage -
Phase I - Applied Technology and Management , Inc . I . I I I . . . . I . . . .
. 1 18
7 . J . Kennedy Groves , Inc . Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid
Phase II - Contract for Construction of Required Improvements . . . . . . . 19
1
BK I I PG 784
7 . K . Raymo Inc . - Request for Final Plat Approval for River Lake Estates
Subdivision - a Replat of Tract A Copeland ' s Landing Subdivision Phase I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 22
7 . L . Resolution No . 2001 - 008 - Request to Pull Letter of Credit for Pelican
Pointe Phase 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7 . M . Heron Crest Development Corporation Request for Final Plat Approval for
Heron Crest Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. I . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 1 27
7 . N . Resolution No . 2001 - 009 - John & Anne Tschinkel Request for Partial
Release of Easement at 5730 Turnberry Lane (Bent Pine Subdivision Unit 3
and4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
7 . 0 . Annual County Fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO . 200 1 - 0 10 - FOREST LAKE
PETITION WATER SERVICES - RESOLUTION III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 33
9 . A . 2 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 002 - FRANK BARATTA ' S
REQUEST TO REZONE ± 32 . 36 ACRES FROM A - 1 TO RMS RM- 6 ( Quasi -
Judicial ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 44
9 . 13 . 1 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - PRESENTATION OF ALPI ( AGRICULTURAL
LABOR PROGRAM INC . ) SERVICES . 0 . . 1 1 1 . 11 . 0 . . . 1 . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 56
9 . 13 . 2 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - STUDENTS WORKING AGAINST TOBACCO
( SWAT) - TOBACCO PREVENTION CAMPAIGN " PUT YOUR MONEY
WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS " - GRASSROOTS PETITION . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . 57
9 . 13 . 3 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FOR UTILITY FEES AND
CHARGES REIMBURSEMENT- RON AND JUNE GAUDET ( ORCHARD
PARK MOBILE HOME PARK AND RON ' S ISLAND COURT MOBILE HOME
PARK ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 61
11 . A . CRC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ( CARLTON RIVER CLUB ) - REQUEST
TO PAVE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD SOUTH OF JUNGLE TRAIL . . . . 66
11 . G . 1 . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT - DAVID AND ELAN FELDMAN -
KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE II ( RIGHT- OF - WAY BETWEEN 1 ST
STREET SW AND 4TH STREET) - DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND
DENSITY CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
11 . G . 2 . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT - THE COLONY - ELM
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES , LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0000 . . . . .
. . . . 74
2 _
�� S
PG 785
7 . K . Raymo Inc . - Request for Final Plat Approval for River Lake Estates
Subdivision - a Replat of Tract A Copeland ' s Landing Subdivision Phase I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 22
7 . L . Resolution No . 2001 - 008 - Request to Pull Letter of Credit for Pelican
Pointe Phase 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7 . M . Heron Crest Development Corporation Request for Final Plat Approval for
Heron Crest Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. I . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 1 27
7 . N . Resolution No . 2001 - 009 - John & Anne Tschinkel Request for Partial
Release of Easement at 5730 Turnberry Lane (Bent Pine Subdivision Unit 3
and4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
7 . 0 . Annual County Fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO . 200 1 - 0 10 - FOREST LAKE
PETITION WATER SERVICES - RESOLUTION III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 33
9 . A . 2 . PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 002 - FRANK BARATTA ' S
REQUEST TO REZONE ± 32 . 36 ACRES FROM A - 1 TO RMS RM- 6 ( Quasi -
Judicial ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 44
9 . 13 . 1 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - PRESENTATION OF ALPI ( AGRICULTURAL
LABOR PROGRAM INC . ) SERVICES . 0 . . 1 1 1 . 11 . 0 . . . 1 . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 56
9 . 13 . 2 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - STUDENTS WORKING AGAINST TOBACCO
( SWAT) - TOBACCO PREVENTION CAMPAIGN " PUT YOUR MONEY
WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS " - GRASSROOTS PETITION . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . 57
9 . 13 . 3 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FOR UTILITY FEES AND
CHARGES REIMBURSEMENT- RON AND JUNE GAUDET ( ORCHARD
PARK MOBILE HOME PARK AND RON ' S ISLAND COURT MOBILE HOME
PARK ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 61
11 . A . CRC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ( CARLTON RIVER CLUB ) - REQUEST
TO PAVE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD SOUTH OF JUNGLE TRAIL . . . . 66
11 . G . 1 . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT - DAVID AND ELAN FELDMAN -
KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE II ( RIGHT- OF - WAY BETWEEN 1 ST
STREET SW AND 4TH STREET) - DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND
DENSITY CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
11 . G . 2 . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT - THE COLONY - ELM
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES , LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0000 . . . . .
. . . . 74
2 _
�� S
PG 785
n
11 . H . DEVELOPER " AGREEMENT WITH ARBOR TRACE DEVELOPMENT , INC .
- 10 - INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG OSLO ROAD AND 6 - INCH FORCE MAIN
ALONG 43RD AVENUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
12 . NEXTEL SOUTH CORP . v . INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - OUTSIDE LEGAL
COUNSEL PROVIDED BY EXCESS INSURANCE CARRIER FLORIDA
LEAGUE OF COUNTIES ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
13 . 13 . VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - LOST TREE ISLANDS 1 . 1 . . . 1 . 1 . . . . 79
13 . 1' , COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS FOR 2001 AND
FILLING OF VACANCIES ..
14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 85
14 . 13 , SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD . . . 1 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 86
3
:r
n
11 . H . DEVELOPER " AGREEMENT WITH ARBOR TRACE DEVELOPMENT , INC .
- 10 - INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG OSLO ROAD AND 6 - INCH FORCE MAIN
ALONG 43RD AVENUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
12 . NEXTEL SOUTH CORP . v . INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - OUTSIDE LEGAL
COUNSEL PROVIDED BY EXCESS INSURANCE CARRIER FLORIDA
LEAGUE OF COUNTIES ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
13 . 13 . VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - LOST TREE ISLANDS 1 . 1 . . . 1 . 1 . . . . 79
13 . 1' , COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS FOR 2001 AND
FILLING OF VACANCIES ..
14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 85
14 . 13 , SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD . . . 1 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 86
3
:r
Y ..
r r.
January 23 , 2001
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida , met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers , 1840 25 " Street, Vero Beach , Florida, on
Tuesday , January 23 , 2001 . Present were Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman ; Ruth Stanbridge ,
Vice Chairman ; Fran B . Adams ; Kenneth R . Macht ; and John W . Tippin . Also present were
James E . Chandler , County Administrator ; Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney ; and Patricia
Ridgely , Deputy Clerk .
1 . CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9 : 00 a . m .
2 . INVOCATION
Vice Chairman Ginn delivered the invocation .
I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Macht led the Pledge to the Flag .
4 . ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested the addition of item 13 . B . , a Discussion
Concerning Lost Tree Islands . Chairman Ginn announced that 7 . 0 . , Annual County Fair,
would be postponed and requested the addition of 11 . H . , a Developer ' s Agreement with
Arbor Trace Development, Inc . for a Force Main .
January 23 , 2001
1
BK 11 6 PG 7 8 7
Y ..
r r.
January 23 , 2001
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida , met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers , 1840 25 " Street, Vero Beach , Florida, on
Tuesday , January 23 , 2001 . Present were Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman ; Ruth Stanbridge ,
Vice Chairman ; Fran B . Adams ; Kenneth R . Macht ; and John W . Tippin . Also present were
James E . Chandler , County Administrator ; Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney ; and Patricia
Ridgely , Deputy Clerk .
1 . CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9 : 00 a . m .
2 . INVOCATION
Vice Chairman Ginn delivered the invocation .
I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Macht led the Pledge to the Flag .
4 . ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested the addition of item 13 . B . , a Discussion
Concerning Lost Tree Islands . Chairman Ginn announced that 7 . 0 . , Annual County Fair,
would be postponed and requested the addition of 11 . H . , a Developer ' s Agreement with
Arbor Trace Development, Inc . for a Force Main .
January 23 , 2001
1
BK 11 6 PG 7 8 7
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously made the above
changes to the agenda .
5 . A . PROCLAMATIONS
None .
O . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 21 , 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000 . There were none .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000 , as
written and distributed .
6 . 0 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 5, 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of December 5 , 2000 . There were none .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 5 , 2000 . as
written and distributed .
January 23 , 2001
8K2
pp -
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously made the above
changes to the agenda .
5 . A . PROCLAMATIONS
None .
O . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 21 , 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000 . There were none .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000 , as
written and distributed .
6 . 0 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 5, 2000
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of December 5 , 2000 . There were none .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 5 , 2000 . as
written and distributed .
January 23 , 2001
8K2
pp -
7 . CONSENT AGKNDA
7. A . Reports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
Delta Farms Water Control District 2000 Audit Report and State of Florida
Annual Local Government Financial Report for FY 1999 - 2000
7. B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 11 , 2001 :
TO : HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE : JANUARY 11 , 2001
SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136 . 06, Florida Statutes , all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes .
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of January 5 , 2001 to January 11 . 2001 .
Attachment :
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
January 5 - 11 , 2001 , as requested .
January 23 , 2001
3
BK i16PG 789
7 . CONSENT AGKNDA
7. A . Reports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
Delta Farms Water Control District 2000 Audit Report and State of Florida
Annual Local Government Financial Report for FY 1999 - 2000
7. B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 11 , 2001 :
TO : HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE : JANUARY 11 , 2001
SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136 . 06, Florida Statutes , all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes .
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of January 5 , 2001 to January 11 . 2001 .
Attachment :
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
January 5 - 11 , 2001 , as requested .
January 23 , 2001
3
BK i16PG 789
i
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0020958 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 041 . 04
0020959 FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2001 - 01 - 04 274 , 018 . 21
0020960 AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN ( FLORIDA ) 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 061 . 90
0020961 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE 2001 - 01 - 04 162 . 86
0020962 BIRD , RICHARD N 2001 - 01 - 08 125 . 10
0020963 MILHERON , VIRGINIA 2001 - 01 - 08 80 . 00
0295481 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 546 . 00
0295482 ABC - CLIO INC 2001 - 01 - 11 38 . 52
0295483 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2001 - 01 - 11 66 . 40
0295484 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 55 . 00
0295485 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE 2001 - 01 - 11 195 . 00
0295486 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 2001 - 01 - 11 658 . 94
0295487 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2001 - 01 - 11 199 . 90
0295488 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH , 2001 - 01 - 11 559 . 80
0295489 AT EASE ARMY NAVY 2001 - 01 - 11 331 . 00
0295490 ATLANTIC REPORTING 2001 - 01 - 11 144 . 55
0295491 ACTION DIESEL INJECTION 2001 - 01 - 11 487 . 05
0295492 ALL POWER SERVICES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 175 . 00
0295493 ALTAMONTE SPRINGS HILTON 2001 - 01 - 11 142 . 00
0295494 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 2001 - 01 - 11 119 . 80
0295495 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 2001 - 01 - 11 58 . 00
0295496 ART KRIEGER CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 11 7 , 552 . 95
0295497 AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT ' L 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 792 . 15
0295498 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 114 . 72
0295499 A T & T 2001 - 01 - 11 199 . 43
0295500 ATLANTIC AUTO TRIM & GLASS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 00
0295501 ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO 2001 - 01 - 11 16 . 65
0295502 ACTION TRAINING SYSTEMS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 135 . 00
0295503 AUTO PARTS OF VERO , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 511 . 63
0295504 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB 2001 - 01 - 11 74 , 29
0295505 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 7 , 297 , 58
0295506 AMERICAN REPORTING 2001 - 01 - 11 329 . 00
0295507 ARCH WIRELESS 2001 - 01 - 11
0295508 A T & T 686 . 84
2001 - 01 - 11 112 . 26
0295509 A T & T MEDIA SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11
0295510 ALL CLEAR LOCATING SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 150 . 00
295 . 50
0295511 AQUA- MARINE SERVICES INC
2001 - 01 - 11 150 . 00
0295512 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2001 - 01 - 11
0295513 BARTH CONSTRUCTION 4 . 57
2001 - 01 - 11 45 , 007 . 87
0295514 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 01 - 11
0295515 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 850 . 75
0295516 BETTER BUSINESS FORMS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 497 , 47
11 , 224 . 45
0295517 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 7 , 903 . 54
0295518 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2001 - 01 - 11
0295519 BRODART CO 759 . 52
2001 - 01 - 11 5 , 063 . 04
0295520 BLAIS ELECTRIC , INC 2001 - 01 - 11
489 . 60
January 23 , 2001
i
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0020958 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 041 . 04
0020959 FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2001 - 01 - 04 274 , 018 . 21
0020960 AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN ( FLORIDA ) 2001 - 01 - 04 1 , 061 . 90
0020961 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE 2001 - 01 - 04 162 . 86
0020962 BIRD , RICHARD N 2001 - 01 - 08 125 . 10
0020963 MILHERON , VIRGINIA 2001 - 01 - 08 80 . 00
0295481 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 546 . 00
0295482 ABC - CLIO INC 2001 - 01 - 11 38 . 52
0295483 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2001 - 01 - 11 66 . 40
0295484 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 55 . 00
0295485 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE 2001 - 01 - 11 195 . 00
0295486 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 2001 - 01 - 11 658 . 94
0295487 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2001 - 01 - 11 199 . 90
0295488 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH , 2001 - 01 - 11 559 . 80
0295489 AT EASE ARMY NAVY 2001 - 01 - 11 331 . 00
0295490 ATLANTIC REPORTING 2001 - 01 - 11 144 . 55
0295491 ACTION DIESEL INJECTION 2001 - 01 - 11 487 . 05
0295492 ALL POWER SERVICES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 175 . 00
0295493 ALTAMONTE SPRINGS HILTON 2001 - 01 - 11 142 . 00
0295494 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 2001 - 01 - 11 119 . 80
0295495 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 2001 - 01 - 11 58 . 00
0295496 ART KRIEGER CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 11 7 , 552 . 95
0295497 AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT ' L 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 792 . 15
0295498 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 114 . 72
0295499 A T & T 2001 - 01 - 11 199 . 43
0295500 ATLANTIC AUTO TRIM & GLASS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 00
0295501 ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO 2001 - 01 - 11 16 . 65
0295502 ACTION TRAINING SYSTEMS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 135 . 00
0295503 AUTO PARTS OF VERO , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 511 . 63
0295504 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB 2001 - 01 - 11 74 , 29
0295505 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 7 , 297 , 58
0295506 AMERICAN REPORTING 2001 - 01 - 11 329 . 00
0295507 ARCH WIRELESS 2001 - 01 - 11
0295508 A T & T 686 . 84
2001 - 01 - 11 112 . 26
0295509 A T & T MEDIA SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11
0295510 ALL CLEAR LOCATING SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 150 . 00
295 . 50
0295511 AQUA- MARINE SERVICES INC
2001 - 01 - 11 150 . 00
0295512 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2001 - 01 - 11
0295513 BARTH CONSTRUCTION 4 . 57
2001 - 01 - 11 45 , 007 . 87
0295514 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 01 - 11
0295515 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 850 . 75
0295516 BETTER BUSINESS FORMS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 497 , 47
11 , 224 . 45
0295517 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 7 , 903 . 54
0295518 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2001 - 01 - 11
0295519 BRODART CO 759 . 52
2001 - 01 - 11 5 , 063 . 04
0295520 BLAIS ELECTRIC , INC 2001 - 01 - 11
489 . 60
January 23 , 2001
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295521 BEVERAGE STOP , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 00
0295522 BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295523 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 2001 - 01 - 11 546 . 45
0295524 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2001 - 01 - 11 98 . 22
0295525 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 2001 - 01 - 11 132 . 30
0295526 BELLSOUTH 2001 - 01 - 11 21 , 678 . 12
0295527 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2001 - 01 - 11 46 . 01
0295528 B & S SOD INC 2001 - 01 - 11 360 . 00
0295529 BOND , EDWIN 2001 - 01 - 11 117 . 00
0295530 BARKER , CONNIE 2001 - 01 - 11 38 . 43
0295531 BELLSOUTH 2001 - 01 - 11 3 .) 6 . 57
0295532 CAMP , DRESSER & MCKEE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 71043 . 00
0295533 CARTER ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 41512 . 06
0295534 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS 2001 - 01 - 11 3 . 75
0295535 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC 2001 - 01 - 11 16 . 07
0295536 CORBIN , SHIRLEY E 2001 - 01 - 11 402 . 50
0295537 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295538 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2001 - 01 - 11 30 , 802 . 39
0295539 COX GIFFORD FUNERAL HOME 2001 - 01 - 11 800 . 00
0295540 COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 675 . 98
0295541 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 2001 - 01 - 11 48 . 45
0295542 CAN WE TALK , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 311 . 00
0295543 CLIFFORD , MIKE 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295544 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 33 . 78
0295545 CSR AMERICA , INC . 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 50
0295546 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2001 - 01 - 11 142 . 50
0295547 COPYCO , LIBERTY DIV OF 2001 - 01 - 11 31 . 26
0295548 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN 2001 - 01 - 11 91472 . 86
0295549 CENTER FOR COUNSELING 2001 - 01 - 11 150 . 00
0295550 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2001 - 01 - 11 158 . 76
0295551 CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295552 CENTER POINT PUBLISHING 2001 - 01 - 11 65 . 88
0295553 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT AT UCF 2001 - 01 - 11 237 . 00
0295554 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 2001 - 01 - 11 8 . 59
0295555 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 11 256 . 50
0295556 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2001 - 01 - 11 10 . 98
0295557 DEMCO INC 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 001 . 48
0295558 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 488 . 66
0295559 DICKERSON - FLORIDA , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 20 . 09
0295560 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 01 - 11 286 . 74
0295561 DON SMITH ' S PAINT STORE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 269 . 79
0295562 DEALERS COST CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 11 15 . 00
0295563 DOW , HOWELL , GILMORE , 2001 - 01 - 11 71746 . 33
0295564 DAVIDSON TITLES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 384 . 87
0295565 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2001 - 01 - 11 50800 . 00
0295566 DADE PAPER COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 210 . 62
January 23 , 2001
5
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295521 BEVERAGE STOP , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 00
0295522 BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295523 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 2001 - 01 - 11 546 . 45
0295524 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2001 - 01 - 11 98 . 22
0295525 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 2001 - 01 - 11 132 . 30
0295526 BELLSOUTH 2001 - 01 - 11 21 , 678 . 12
0295527 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2001 - 01 - 11 46 . 01
0295528 B & S SOD INC 2001 - 01 - 11 360 . 00
0295529 BOND , EDWIN 2001 - 01 - 11 117 . 00
0295530 BARKER , CONNIE 2001 - 01 - 11 38 . 43
0295531 BELLSOUTH 2001 - 01 - 11 3 .) 6 . 57
0295532 CAMP , DRESSER & MCKEE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 71043 . 00
0295533 CARTER ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 41512 . 06
0295534 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS 2001 - 01 - 11 3 . 75
0295535 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC 2001 - 01 - 11 16 . 07
0295536 CORBIN , SHIRLEY E 2001 - 01 - 11 402 . 50
0295537 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295538 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2001 - 01 - 11 30 , 802 . 39
0295539 COX GIFFORD FUNERAL HOME 2001 - 01 - 11 800 . 00
0295540 COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 675 . 98
0295541 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 2001 - 01 - 11 48 . 45
0295542 CAN WE TALK , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 311 . 00
0295543 CLIFFORD , MIKE 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295544 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 33 . 78
0295545 CSR AMERICA , INC . 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 50
0295546 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2001 - 01 - 11 142 . 50
0295547 COPYCO , LIBERTY DIV OF 2001 - 01 - 11 31 . 26
0295548 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN 2001 - 01 - 11 91472 . 86
0295549 CENTER FOR COUNSELING 2001 - 01 - 11 150 . 00
0295550 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2001 - 01 - 11 158 . 76
0295551 CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295552 CENTER POINT PUBLISHING 2001 - 01 - 11 65 . 88
0295553 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT AT UCF 2001 - 01 - 11 237 . 00
0295554 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 2001 - 01 - 11 8 . 59
0295555 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 11 256 . 50
0295556 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2001 - 01 - 11 10 . 98
0295557 DEMCO INC 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 001 . 48
0295558 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 488 . 66
0295559 DICKERSON - FLORIDA , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 20 . 09
0295560 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 01 - 11 286 . 74
0295561 DON SMITH ' S PAINT STORE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 269 . 79
0295562 DEALERS COST CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 11 15 . 00
0295563 DOW , HOWELL , GILMORE , 2001 - 01 - 11 71746 . 33
0295564 DAVIDSON TITLES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 384 . 87
0295565 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2001 - 01 - 11 50800 . 00
0295566 DADE PAPER COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 210 . 62
January 23 , 2001
5
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295567 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2001 - 01 - 11 171 . 55
0295568 DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC 2001 - 01 - 11 33 . 52
0295569 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 229 . 75
0295570 DLT SOLUTIONS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 796 . 00
0295571 DIETZ ENTERPRISES 2001 - 01 - 11 18 , 575 . 00
0295572 DRIVER , JOE AND BEVERLY 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 331 . 30
0295573 EAST COAST LUMBER 2001 - 01 - 11 33 , 015 . 37
0295574 EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 256 . 06
0295575 ELPEX , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 653 . 49
0295576 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 2001 - 01 - 11 28 , 045 . 00
0295577 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 262 . 08
0295578 EVERGLADES FARM 2001 - 01 - 11 81 . 65
0295579 FEDEX 2001 - 01 - 11 515 . 64
0295580 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 332 . 00
0295581 FLORIDA COCA - COLA BOTTLING CO 2001 - 01 - 11 240 . 70
0295582 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 968 . 02
0295583 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 128 . 47
0295584 FLINN , SHEILA I 2001 - 01 - 11 707 . 00
0295585 FLORIDA SECTION ITE 2001 - 01 - 11 140 . 00
0295586 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2001 - 01 - 11 50 . 00
0295587 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 2001 - 01 - 11 25 . 00
0295588 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 073 . 25
0295589 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 11 821 . 85
0295590 FLORIDA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 2001 - 01 - 11 122 . 00
0295591 FLORIDA HEALTHY KIDS CORP 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 083 . 33
0295592 FIRST UNION 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 886 . 57
0295593 GALE GROUP , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 374 . 20
0295594 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 11 . 87
0295595 GAYLORD BROTHERS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 484 . 79
0295596 GENE ' S AUTO GLASS 2001 - 01 - 11 320 . 00
0295597 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 11
0295598 GOVERNMENT FINANCE 2001 - 01 - 11 10 . 00
0295599 GALL ' S INC 2001 - 01 - 11 7 . 74
0295600 GREENS , ROBERT E 2001 - 01 - 11 484 . 61
0295601 GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER 2001 - 01 - 11 41762 . 70
0295602 GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 133 . 00
0295603 GRAPHIC DESIGNS INTERNATIONAL 2001 - 01 - 11 88 . 02
0295604 GALLAGHER , ARTHUR J & CO 2001 - 01 - 11 9 , 041 . 00
0295605 GRAPHX PRINTING 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 00
0295606 HARRIS SANITATION , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 25 . 00
0295607 HARRISON COMPANY , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 178 . 65
0295608 HECTOR TURF , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 18 , 981 . 25
0295609 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2001 - 01 - 11 13 , 500 . 00
0295610 HUNT INSURANCE GROUP , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 700 . 00
0295611 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2001 - 01 - 11 739 . 71
0295612 HAILE DEAN SEED CO 2001 - 01 - 11 106 . 50
January 23 , 2001 _
6 - _
8K 2
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295567 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2001 - 01 - 11 171 . 55
0295568 DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC 2001 - 01 - 11 33 . 52
0295569 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 229 . 75
0295570 DLT SOLUTIONS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 796 . 00
0295571 DIETZ ENTERPRISES 2001 - 01 - 11 18 , 575 . 00
0295572 DRIVER , JOE AND BEVERLY 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 331 . 30
0295573 EAST COAST LUMBER 2001 - 01 - 11 33 , 015 . 37
0295574 EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 256 . 06
0295575 ELPEX , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 653 . 49
0295576 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 2001 - 01 - 11 28 , 045 . 00
0295577 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 262 . 08
0295578 EVERGLADES FARM 2001 - 01 - 11 81 . 65
0295579 FEDEX 2001 - 01 - 11 515 . 64
0295580 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 332 . 00
0295581 FLORIDA COCA - COLA BOTTLING CO 2001 - 01 - 11 240 . 70
0295582 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 968 . 02
0295583 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 128 . 47
0295584 FLINN , SHEILA I 2001 - 01 - 11 707 . 00
0295585 FLORIDA SECTION ITE 2001 - 01 - 11 140 . 00
0295586 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2001 - 01 - 11 50 . 00
0295587 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS 2001 - 01 - 11 25 . 00
0295588 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 073 . 25
0295589 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 11 821 . 85
0295590 FLORIDA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 2001 - 01 - 11 122 . 00
0295591 FLORIDA HEALTHY KIDS CORP 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 083 . 33
0295592 FIRST UNION 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 886 . 57
0295593 GALE GROUP , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 374 . 20
0295594 GATOR LUMBER COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 11 . 87
0295595 GAYLORD BROTHERS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 484 . 79
0295596 GENE ' S AUTO GLASS 2001 - 01 - 11 320 . 00
0295597 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 11
0295598 GOVERNMENT FINANCE 2001 - 01 - 11 10 . 00
0295599 GALL ' S INC 2001 - 01 - 11 7 . 74
0295600 GREENS , ROBERT E 2001 - 01 - 11 484 . 61
0295601 GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER 2001 - 01 - 11 41762 . 70
0295602 GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 133 . 00
0295603 GRAPHIC DESIGNS INTERNATIONAL 2001 - 01 - 11 88 . 02
0295604 GALLAGHER , ARTHUR J & CO 2001 - 01 - 11 9 , 041 . 00
0295605 GRAPHX PRINTING 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 00
0295606 HARRIS SANITATION , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 25 . 00
0295607 HARRISON COMPANY , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 178 . 65
0295608 HECTOR TURF , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 18 , 981 . 25
0295609 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2001 - 01 - 11 13 , 500 . 00
0295610 HUNT INSURANCE GROUP , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 700 . 00
0295611 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2001 - 01 - 11 739 . 71
0295612 HAILE DEAN SEED CO 2001 - 01 - 11 106 . 50
January 23 , 2001 _
6 - _
8K 2
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0295613 HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES 2001 - 01 - 11 26 , 000 . 00
0295614 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 500 . 00
0295615 HOWARD JOHNSON EXPRESS INN 2001 - 01 - 11 42 . 00
0295616 HANSEN , SUSAN 2001 - 01 - 11 93 . 67
0295617 HOME DEPOT 2001 - 01 - 11 891 . 00
0295618 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2001 - 01 - 11 239 . 50
0295619 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295620 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 255 . 45
0295621 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 385 . 02
0295622 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 58 . 56
0295623 ISIS PUBLISHING 2001 - 01 - 11 683 . 55
0295624 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 006 . 25
0295625 IRVINE MECHANICAL , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 61 , 269 . 00
0295626 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2001 - 01 - 11 774 . 54
0295627 ICISF , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 224 . 00
0295628 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF ' S 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 656 . 33
0295629 INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 86
0295630 INDUSCO SOUTH , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 944 . 96
0295631 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2001 - 01 - 11 204 . 00
0295632 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001 - 01 - 11 700 . 78
0295633 JENNINGS , ANTOINE 2001 - 01 - 11 210 . 00
0295634 KLUCINEC , MONA 2001 - 01 - 11 21 . 60
0295635 KNIGHT , MCGUIRE & ASSOCIATES 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295636 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2001 - 01 - 11
0295637 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 900 . 00
0295638 KING , PAMELA C 11 . 64
2001 - 01 - 11 165 . 00
0295639 LAUREL BUILDERS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11
0295640 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY , INC 27 . 000 . 00
2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 19
0295641 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC . 2001 - 01 - 11
0295642 LEWIS , RUTH A 519 . 41
2001 - 01 - 11 51 . 30
0295643 L B SMITH , INC 2001 - 01 - 11
0295644 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2001 - 01 - 11 113 . 37
144 . 99
0295645 LFI VERO BEACH , INC
0295646 LEXIS LAW PUBLISHING 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 176 . 32
2001 - 01 - 11 85 . 28
0295647 LARGE PRINT LIBRARY DISCOUNTER 2001 - 01 - 11
0295648 LES CAMELA , ELISA M 42 . 02
0295649 LANDT , WILLIAM G 2001 - 01 - 11 213 . 50
2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295650 MIKES GARAGE
2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 00
0295651 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION
2001 - 01 - 11 311 . 27
0295652 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY &
2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 245 . 00
0295653 MARTIN ' S LAMAR - UNIFORMS
2001 - 01 - 11 637 . 50
0295654 MDS MATRX
0295655 MICRO WAREHOUSE 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 139 . 60
2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 418 . 11
0295656 METAL CULVERTS
2001 - 01 - 11 430 . 00
0295657 MULLER , MINT2 , KORNREICH ,
0295658 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 941 . 02
2001 - 01 - 11 231 . 86
January 23 , 2001
7
BK 11 6 PG 7 9 3
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0295613 HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES 2001 - 01 - 11 26 , 000 . 00
0295614 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 500 . 00
0295615 HOWARD JOHNSON EXPRESS INN 2001 - 01 - 11 42 . 00
0295616 HANSEN , SUSAN 2001 - 01 - 11 93 . 67
0295617 HOME DEPOT 2001 - 01 - 11 891 . 00
0295618 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2001 - 01 - 11 239 . 50
0295619 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295620 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 255 . 45
0295621 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 385 . 02
0295622 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2001 - 01 - 11 58 . 56
0295623 ISIS PUBLISHING 2001 - 01 - 11 683 . 55
0295624 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 006 . 25
0295625 IRVINE MECHANICAL , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 61 , 269 . 00
0295626 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2001 - 01 - 11 774 . 54
0295627 ICISF , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 224 . 00
0295628 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF ' S 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 656 . 33
0295629 INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 86
0295630 INDUSCO SOUTH , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 944 . 96
0295631 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2001 - 01 - 11 204 . 00
0295632 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001 - 01 - 11 700 . 78
0295633 JENNINGS , ANTOINE 2001 - 01 - 11 210 . 00
0295634 KLUCINEC , MONA 2001 - 01 - 11 21 . 60
0295635 KNIGHT , MCGUIRE & ASSOCIATES 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295636 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2001 - 01 - 11
0295637 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 900 . 00
0295638 KING , PAMELA C 11 . 64
2001 - 01 - 11 165 . 00
0295639 LAUREL BUILDERS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11
0295640 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY , INC 27 . 000 . 00
2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 19
0295641 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC . 2001 - 01 - 11
0295642 LEWIS , RUTH A 519 . 41
2001 - 01 - 11 51 . 30
0295643 L B SMITH , INC 2001 - 01 - 11
0295644 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2001 - 01 - 11 113 . 37
144 . 99
0295645 LFI VERO BEACH , INC
0295646 LEXIS LAW PUBLISHING 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 176 . 32
2001 - 01 - 11 85 . 28
0295647 LARGE PRINT LIBRARY DISCOUNTER 2001 - 01 - 11
0295648 LES CAMELA , ELISA M 42 . 02
0295649 LANDT , WILLIAM G 2001 - 01 - 11 213 . 50
2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295650 MIKES GARAGE
2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 00
0295651 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION
2001 - 01 - 11 311 . 27
0295652 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY &
2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 245 . 00
0295653 MARTIN ' S LAMAR - UNIFORMS
2001 - 01 - 11 637 . 50
0295654 MDS MATRX
0295655 MICRO WAREHOUSE 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 139 . 60
2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 418 . 11
0295656 METAL CULVERTS
2001 - 01 - 11 430 . 00
0295657 MULLER , MINT2 , KORNREICH ,
0295658 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 941 . 02
2001 - 01 - 11 231 . 86
January 23 , 2001
7
BK 11 6 PG 7 9 3
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295659 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 2001 - 01 - 11 366 . 00
0295660 MARC INDUSTRIES 2001 - 01 - 11 148 . 00
0295661 M E SHARPE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 241 . 68
0295662 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 500 . 00
0295663 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 185 . 01
0295664 MIDLANTIC DATA SYSTEMS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 479 . 01
0295665 MCCAIN , STEVEN R 2001 - 01 - 11 137 . 50
0295666 LARRY MCDONALD PROPERTIES 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295667 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION 2001 - 01 - 11 172 . 11
0295668 MEREDITH BOOKS 2001 - 01 - 11 23 . 46
0295669 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING 2001 - 01 - 11 662 . 52
0295670 NOLTE , DAVID C 2001 - 01 - 11 19 , 170 . 25
0295671 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 34 . 84
0295672 NAN MCKAY & ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 149 . 00
0295673 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 2001 - 01 - 11 34 , 036 . 67
0295674 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 2001 - 01 - 11 98 . 20
0295675 NEW YORK TIMES , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 488 . 50
0295676 NATIONAL BAG COMPANY , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 535 . 76
0295677 NACPRO 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 00
0295678 NIKE USA , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 87
0295679 NORTH AMERICAN BOOK DISTRIBTRS 2001 - 01 - 11 360 . 00
0295680 NAIMISHA CONSTRUCTION , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295681 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 887 . 03
0295682 OMNIGRAPHICS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 475 . 08
0295683 OFFICE DEPOT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 808 . 32
0295684 OFFICE OF VITAL STATISTIC 2001 - 01 - 11 43 . 86
0295685 OSCEOLA PHARMACY 2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 99
0295686 OLDHAM , JAKE 2001 - 01 - 11 57 . 00
0295687 OLD DIXIE PAINT & BODY 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295688 PALM BEACH AIRPORT HILTON 2001 - 01 - 11 309 . 00
0295689 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2001 - 01 - 11 357 . 78
0295690 POSTMASTER 2001 - 01 - 11 751 . 00
0295691 PUBLIC DEFENDER 2001 - 01 - 11 5 , 891 . 20
0295692 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 000 . 00
0295693 PETTY CASH 2001 - 01 - 11 20 . 10
0295694 PICTON PRESS 2001 - 01 - 11 270 . 00
0295695 PORT CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 01 - 11 370 . 15
0295696 PAK- MAIL 2001 - 01 - 11 11 . 75
0295697 PAGE , LIVINGSTON 2001 - 01 - 11 416 . 00
0295698 PETERSEN INDUSTRIES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 98 . 87
0295699 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 055 . 08
0295700 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES 2001 - 01 - 11 324 . 00
0295701 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295702 PENWORTHY COMPANY , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 467 . 77
0295703 POWERWARE CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 11 682 . 00
0295704 QUALITY BOOKS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 37 . 03
January 23 , 2001
BK IIS G 794
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295659 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET 2001 - 01 - 11 366 . 00
0295660 MARC INDUSTRIES 2001 - 01 - 11 148 . 00
0295661 M E SHARPE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 241 . 68
0295662 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 500 . 00
0295663 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 185 . 01
0295664 MIDLANTIC DATA SYSTEMS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 479 . 01
0295665 MCCAIN , STEVEN R 2001 - 01 - 11 137 . 50
0295666 LARRY MCDONALD PROPERTIES 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295667 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION 2001 - 01 - 11 172 . 11
0295668 MEREDITH BOOKS 2001 - 01 - 11 23 . 46
0295669 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING 2001 - 01 - 11 662 . 52
0295670 NOLTE , DAVID C 2001 - 01 - 11 19 , 170 . 25
0295671 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 34 . 84
0295672 NAN MCKAY & ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 149 . 00
0295673 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 2001 - 01 - 11 34 , 036 . 67
0295674 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 2001 - 01 - 11 98 . 20
0295675 NEW YORK TIMES , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 488 . 50
0295676 NATIONAL BAG COMPANY , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 535 . 76
0295677 NACPRO 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 00
0295678 NIKE USA , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 87
0295679 NORTH AMERICAN BOOK DISTRIBTRS 2001 - 01 - 11 360 . 00
0295680 NAIMISHA CONSTRUCTION , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295681 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 887 . 03
0295682 OMNIGRAPHICS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 475 . 08
0295683 OFFICE DEPOT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 808 . 32
0295684 OFFICE OF VITAL STATISTIC 2001 - 01 - 11 43 . 86
0295685 OSCEOLA PHARMACY 2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 99
0295686 OLDHAM , JAKE 2001 - 01 - 11 57 . 00
0295687 OLD DIXIE PAINT & BODY 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295688 PALM BEACH AIRPORT HILTON 2001 - 01 - 11 309 . 00
0295689 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2001 - 01 - 11 357 . 78
0295690 POSTMASTER 2001 - 01 - 11 751 . 00
0295691 PUBLIC DEFENDER 2001 - 01 - 11 5 , 891 . 20
0295692 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 000 . 00
0295693 PETTY CASH 2001 - 01 - 11 20 . 10
0295694 PICTON PRESS 2001 - 01 - 11 270 . 00
0295695 PORT CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 01 - 11 370 . 15
0295696 PAK- MAIL 2001 - 01 - 11 11 . 75
0295697 PAGE , LIVINGSTON 2001 - 01 - 11 416 . 00
0295698 PETERSEN INDUSTRIES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 98 . 87
0295699 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 055 . 08
0295700 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES 2001 - 01 - 11 324 . 00
0295701 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295702 PENWORTHY COMPANY , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 467 . 77
0295703 POWERWARE CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 11 682 . 00
0295704 QUALITY BOOKS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 37 . 03
January 23 , 2001
BK IIS G 794
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295705 RADIOSHACK 2001 - 01 - 11 86 . 95
0295706 RUSSELL CONCRETE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 563 . 88
0295707 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 850 . 30
0295708 RAYMOND , ROY SHERIFF OF 2001 - 01 - 11 19 , 798 . 40
0295709 RECORDED BOOKS , LLC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 137 . 50
0295710 RESEARCH COMMITTEE ON DISASTER 2001 - 01 - 11 45 . 00
0295711 ROYAL CUP COFFEE 2001 - 01 - 11 142 . 00
0295712 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 01 - 11 781 . 86
0295713 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2001 - 01 - 11 934 . 51
0295714 RAUTH , GENE 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295715 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET 2001 - 01 - 11 605 . 49
0295716 ROSEN PUBLISHING GROUP 2001 - 01 - 11 35 . 90
0295717 RAINFOREST IRRIGATION 2001 - 01 - 11 481 . 50
0295718 SEWELL HARDWARE CO , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 128 . 40
0295719 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING , 2001 - 01 - 11 406 . 25
0295720 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 2001 - 01 - 11 14 . 39
0295721 SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 261 . 81
0295722 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR & 2001 - 01 - 11 659 . 84
0295723 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2001 - 01 - 11 60 . 00
0295724 SHELTRA & SON CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 142 , 165 . 12
0295725 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 2001 - 01 - 11 13 , 418 . 00
0295726 SALEM PRESS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 272 . 50
0295727 SLEZAK , MARY 2001 - 01 - 11 248 . 50
0295728 SOLINET 2001 - 01 - 11 380 . 92
0295729 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 51125 . 86
0295730 SEBASTIAN , CITY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 6 , 148 . 68
0295731 SOLAR SCREENING 2001 - 01 - 11 145 . 00
0295732 SECURITYLINK FROM 2001 - 01 - 11 82 . 50
0295733 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2001 - 01 - 11 990 . 00
0295734 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 183 . 85
0295735 STAGE & SCREEN 2001 - 01 - 11 104 . 09
0295736 SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE 2001 - 01 - 11 319 . 00
0295737 STONE ' S TRANSPORTATION 2001 - 01 - 11 230 . 00
0295738 SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS 2001 - 01 - 11 997 . 30
0295739 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 01 - 11 25 . 00
0295740 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST 2001 - 01 - 11 350 . 00
0295741 SKAGGS 2001 - 01 - 11 178 . 42
0295742 SPEIRS , DONNA 2001 - 01 - 11 374 . 50
0295743 SHERATON ORLANDO NORTH HOTEL 2001 - 01 - 11 198 . 00
0295744 SANCHEZ , PHILLIP MD 2001 - 01 - 11 750 . 00
0295745 SHELL CREDIT CARD CENTER 2001 - 01 - 11 14 . 28
0295746 TEN - 8 FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 040 . 99
0295747 TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP 2001 - 01 - 11 331 . 05
0295748 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC . , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 33 , 332 . 94
0295749 TRITRONICS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 284 . 19
0295750 TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES 2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 00
January 23 , 2001
9
8 Ir
795
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295705 RADIOSHACK 2001 - 01 - 11 86 . 95
0295706 RUSSELL CONCRETE , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 563 . 88
0295707 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 850 . 30
0295708 RAYMOND , ROY SHERIFF OF 2001 - 01 - 11 19 , 798 . 40
0295709 RECORDED BOOKS , LLC 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 137 . 50
0295710 RESEARCH COMMITTEE ON DISASTER 2001 - 01 - 11 45 . 00
0295711 ROYAL CUP COFFEE 2001 - 01 - 11 142 . 00
0295712 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 01 - 11 781 . 86
0295713 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2001 - 01 - 11 934 . 51
0295714 RAUTH , GENE 2001 - 01 - 11 200 . 00
0295715 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET 2001 - 01 - 11 605 . 49
0295716 ROSEN PUBLISHING GROUP 2001 - 01 - 11 35 . 90
0295717 RAINFOREST IRRIGATION 2001 - 01 - 11 481 . 50
0295718 SEWELL HARDWARE CO , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 128 . 40
0295719 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING , 2001 - 01 - 11 406 . 25
0295720 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 2001 - 01 - 11 14 . 39
0295721 SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 261 . 81
0295722 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR & 2001 - 01 - 11 659 . 84
0295723 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2001 - 01 - 11 60 . 00
0295724 SHELTRA & SON CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 142 , 165 . 12
0295725 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 2001 - 01 - 11 13 , 418 . 00
0295726 SALEM PRESS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 2 , 272 . 50
0295727 SLEZAK , MARY 2001 - 01 - 11 248 . 50
0295728 SOLINET 2001 - 01 - 11 380 . 92
0295729 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 51125 . 86
0295730 SEBASTIAN , CITY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 6 , 148 . 68
0295731 SOLAR SCREENING 2001 - 01 - 11 145 . 00
0295732 SECURITYLINK FROM 2001 - 01 - 11 82 . 50
0295733 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2001 - 01 - 11 990 . 00
0295734 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 183 . 85
0295735 STAGE & SCREEN 2001 - 01 - 11 104 . 09
0295736 SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE 2001 - 01 - 11 319 . 00
0295737 STONE ' S TRANSPORTATION 2001 - 01 - 11 230 . 00
0295738 SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS 2001 - 01 - 11 997 . 30
0295739 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 01 - 11 25 . 00
0295740 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST 2001 - 01 - 11 350 . 00
0295741 SKAGGS 2001 - 01 - 11 178 . 42
0295742 SPEIRS , DONNA 2001 - 01 - 11 374 . 50
0295743 SHERATON ORLANDO NORTH HOTEL 2001 - 01 - 11 198 . 00
0295744 SANCHEZ , PHILLIP MD 2001 - 01 - 11 750 . 00
0295745 SHELL CREDIT CARD CENTER 2001 - 01 - 11 14 . 28
0295746 TEN - 8 FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 4 , 040 . 99
0295747 TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP 2001 - 01 - 11 331 . 05
0295748 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC . , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 33 , 332 . 94
0295749 TRITRONICS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 284 . 19
0295750 TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES 2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 00
January 23 , 2001
9
8 Ir
795
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295751 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2001 - 01 - 11 754 . 00
0295752 TRANSIT AIR CONDITIONING 2001 - 01 - 11 117 . 02
0295753 THERMOGAS COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 61
0295754 T A P SOD 2001 - 01 - 11 5 , 995 . 06
0295755 TRAVEL BY PEGASUS 2001 - 01 - 11 572 . 00
0295756 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2001 - 01 - 11 21603 . 93
0295757 TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL 2001 - 01 - 11 103 . 75
0295758 UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA 2001 - 01 - 11 49 . 95
0295759 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 090 . 00
0295760 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 495 . 00
0295761 VELDE FORD , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 51919 . 72
0295762 VERO BEACH PRINTING INC 2001 - 01 - 11 183 . 50
0295763 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 22 , 288 . 77
0295764 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 361 . 46
0295765 VERO MOTEL 2001 - 01 - 11 88 . 00
0295766 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 01 - 11 60 . 00
0295767 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2001 - 01 - 11 94 . 33
0295768 VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO 2001 - 01 - 11 149 . 31
0295769 VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 238 . 49
0295770 WALSH , LYNN 2001 - 01 - 11 32 . 48
0295771 WGYL - FM 93 . 7 FM 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 00
0295772 WILSON ' S PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT , 2001 - 01 - 11 337 . 94
0295773 WOLSTENHOLME , SHIRLEY 2001 - 01 - 11 26 . 70
0295774 WOODY ' S PRINTING 2001 - 01 - 11 38 . 00
0295775 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2001 - 01 - 11 104 . 00
0295776 WILLIAM THIES & SONS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 201 . 60
0295777 WILLIAMS , BETTY R , RN 2001 - 01 - 11 44 . 00
0295778 WHEELER PUBLISHING , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 204 . 35
0295779 WTTB AM 1490 2001 - 01 - 11 50 . 00
0295780 WILSON , MARGARET F 2001 - 01 - 11 108 . 46
0295781 WHITESIDE PARTS & SERVICE INC 2001 - 01 - 11 91 . 32
0295782 WAL * MART STORE 931 2001 - 01 - 11 158 . 99
0295783 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2001 - 01 - 11 610 . 00
0295784 W W GRAINGER INC 2001 - 01 - 11 717 . 39
0295785 XEROX CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 884 . 08
0295786 ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING 2001 - 01 - 11 11 . 00
0295787 ZBROROWKSI CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295788 GIACINI , FRANCES A 2001 - 01 - 11 54 . 70
0295789 BURGOON BERGER CONST CO 2001 - 01 - 11 32 . 71
0295790 INCITCO REALTY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 17 . 73
0295791 MC GEE , KELLI - 2001 - 01 - 11 36 . 53
0295792 WOOD , ELIZABETH 2001 - 01 - 11 65 . 72
0295793 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 601 . 28
0295794 WISSEL CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 27
0295795 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 01 - 11 228 . 58
0295796 CENTURY 21 SEA TREK 2001 - 01 - 11 41 . 39
January 23 , 2001 _
10 - - -
trM4. . . . ., . ., 771 ,77 y , ,, y5 .i, x. " �, x ,?,. .+*L?.. : ' i4 ^'`z�- , , ur
.z.
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295751 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2001 - 01 - 11 754 . 00
0295752 TRANSIT AIR CONDITIONING 2001 - 01 - 11 117 . 02
0295753 THERMOGAS COMPANY 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 61
0295754 T A P SOD 2001 - 01 - 11 5 , 995 . 06
0295755 TRAVEL BY PEGASUS 2001 - 01 - 11 572 . 00
0295756 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2001 - 01 - 11 21603 . 93
0295757 TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL 2001 - 01 - 11 103 . 75
0295758 UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA 2001 - 01 - 11 49 . 95
0295759 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 090 . 00
0295760 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA , THE 2001 - 01 - 11 495 . 00
0295761 VELDE FORD , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 51919 . 72
0295762 VERO BEACH PRINTING INC 2001 - 01 - 11 183 . 50
0295763 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 01 - 11 22 , 288 . 77
0295764 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 361 . 46
0295765 VERO MOTEL 2001 - 01 - 11 88 . 00
0295766 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 01 - 11 60 . 00
0295767 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2001 - 01 - 11 94 . 33
0295768 VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO 2001 - 01 - 11 149 . 31
0295769 VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN 2001 - 01 - 11 3 , 238 . 49
0295770 WALSH , LYNN 2001 - 01 - 11 32 . 48
0295771 WGYL - FM 93 . 7 FM 2001 - 01 - 11 125 . 00
0295772 WILSON ' S PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT , 2001 - 01 - 11 337 . 94
0295773 WOLSTENHOLME , SHIRLEY 2001 - 01 - 11 26 . 70
0295774 WOODY ' S PRINTING 2001 - 01 - 11 38 . 00
0295775 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2001 - 01 - 11 104 . 00
0295776 WILLIAM THIES & SONS , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 201 . 60
0295777 WILLIAMS , BETTY R , RN 2001 - 01 - 11 44 . 00
0295778 WHEELER PUBLISHING , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 204 . 35
0295779 WTTB AM 1490 2001 - 01 - 11 50 . 00
0295780 WILSON , MARGARET F 2001 - 01 - 11 108 . 46
0295781 WHITESIDE PARTS & SERVICE INC 2001 - 01 - 11 91 . 32
0295782 WAL * MART STORE 931 2001 - 01 - 11 158 . 99
0295783 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2001 - 01 - 11 610 . 00
0295784 W W GRAINGER INC 2001 - 01 - 11 717 . 39
0295785 XEROX CORPORATION 2001 - 01 - 11 1 , 884 . 08
0295786 ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING 2001 - 01 - 11 11 . 00
0295787 ZBROROWKSI CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 500 . 00
0295788 GIACINI , FRANCES A 2001 - 01 - 11 54 . 70
0295789 BURGOON BERGER CONST CO 2001 - 01 - 11 32 . 71
0295790 INCITCO REALTY INC 2001 - 01 - 11 17 . 73
0295791 MC GEE , KELLI - 2001 - 01 - 11 36 . 53
0295792 WOOD , ELIZABETH 2001 - 01 - 11 65 . 72
0295793 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 601 . 28
0295794 WISSEL CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 27
0295795 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 01 - 11 228 . 58
0295796 CENTURY 21 SEA TREK 2001 - 01 - 11 41 . 39
January 23 , 2001 _
10 - - -
trM4. . . . ., . ., 771 ,77 y , ,, y5 .i, x. " �, x ,?,. .+*L?.. : ' i4 ^'`z�- , , ur
.z.
F'
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295797 CUMMINGS , MILLARD & MARILYN 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 30
0295798 CARDON , ROBERT 2001 - 01 - 11 92 . 85
0295799 JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 26
0295800 GHO VER BEACH INC 2001 - 01 - 11 180 . 86
0295801 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 13
0295802 DO , LONG N 2001 - 01 - 11 33 . 99
0295803 WIEDRICK , ANN E 2001 - 01 - 11 19 . 27
0295804 FAXON , LINDA 2001 - 01 - 11 95 . 37
0295805 COASTLINE DEVELOPMENT INC 2001 - 01 - 11 26 . 20
0295806 KYLE ' S RUN 2001 - 01 - 11 63 . 47
0295807 BOTT , JAMES D 2001 - 01 - I1 7 . 16
0295808 KRUEGER , STEPHEN 2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 76
0295809 BECHARD , DAVID & ANGIE 2001 - 01 - 11 47 . 71
0295810 RITTENHOUSE II , RIC 2001 - 01 - 11 8 . 30
0295811 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 2001 - 01 - 11 67 . 26
0295812 SYBIL INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP 2001 - 01 - 11 268 . 52
0295813 MIENSMA , DAVID 2001 - 01 - 11 30 . 08
0295814 AMERITREND HOMES 2001 - 01 - 11 44 . 06
0295815 KOHLER , JOHN W 2001 - 01 - 11 29 . 65
0295816 RUPPERT , DAVID P 2001 - 01 - 11 31 . 52
0295817 SHERMAN , DAWN D 2001 - 01 - 11 18 . 48
0295818 ROMANS , WILLIAM E 2001 - 01 - 11 22 , 17
0295819 BARBIER , AGNES 2001 - 01 - 11 18 . 90
0295820 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 83 . 11
0295821 CHANNING CORP XXIX 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 74
0295822 ROYAL PALM HOMES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 10 . 54
0295823 HINNANT , BRYAN 2001 - 01 - 11 36 . 23
0295824 POWER , CAROL & VINCE 2001 - 01 - 11 50 . 74
0295825 TURNER , JERRY 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 88
0295826 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 523 . 00
0295827 HACKNEY , ANNASTACIA 2001 - 01 - 11 80 . 30
0295828 BRITTAIN , ROSE ANN 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 17
0295829 MORGAN , JOSEPH C 2001 - 01 - 11 82 . 79
0295830 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES 2001 - 01 - 11 9 . 24
0295831 CARNEVALE , RICHARD 2001 - 01 - 11 63 . 12
0295832 NOLEN , ROBERT J 2001 - 01 - 11 20 . 42
0295833 PERRY , BOLTON 2001 - 01 - 11 46 . 67
0295834 HARRIS , ROSE RILEY 2001 - 01 - 11 28 . 72
0295835 ZHENG , DE SHENG 2001 - 01 - 11 61 . 01
0295836 KEITH , RICHARD 2001 - 01 - 11 31 . 08
1 , 155 , 233 . 78
January 23 , 2001
11
8K 1 16 PG 7 9 7
c
F'
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0295797 CUMMINGS , MILLARD & MARILYN 2001 - 01 - 11 52 . 30
0295798 CARDON , ROBERT 2001 - 01 - 11 92 . 85
0295799 JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS INC 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 26
0295800 GHO VER BEACH INC 2001 - 01 - 11 180 . 86
0295801 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 13
0295802 DO , LONG N 2001 - 01 - 11 33 . 99
0295803 WIEDRICK , ANN E 2001 - 01 - 11 19 . 27
0295804 FAXON , LINDA 2001 - 01 - 11 95 . 37
0295805 COASTLINE DEVELOPMENT INC 2001 - 01 - 11 26 . 20
0295806 KYLE ' S RUN 2001 - 01 - 11 63 . 47
0295807 BOTT , JAMES D 2001 - 01 - I1 7 . 16
0295808 KRUEGER , STEPHEN 2001 - 01 - 11 90 . 76
0295809 BECHARD , DAVID & ANGIE 2001 - 01 - 11 47 . 71
0295810 RITTENHOUSE II , RIC 2001 - 01 - 11 8 . 30
0295811 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES 2001 - 01 - 11 67 . 26
0295812 SYBIL INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP 2001 - 01 - 11 268 . 52
0295813 MIENSMA , DAVID 2001 - 01 - 11 30 . 08
0295814 AMERITREND HOMES 2001 - 01 - 11 44 . 06
0295815 KOHLER , JOHN W 2001 - 01 - 11 29 . 65
0295816 RUPPERT , DAVID P 2001 - 01 - 11 31 . 52
0295817 SHERMAN , DAWN D 2001 - 01 - 11 18 . 48
0295818 ROMANS , WILLIAM E 2001 - 01 - 11 22 , 17
0295819 BARBIER , AGNES 2001 - 01 - 11 18 . 90
0295820 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 83 . 11
0295821 CHANNING CORP XXIX 2001 - 01 - 11 70 . 74
0295822 ROYAL PALM HOMES INC 2001 - 01 - 11 10 . 54
0295823 HINNANT , BRYAN 2001 - 01 - 11 36 . 23
0295824 POWER , CAROL & VINCE 2001 - 01 - 11 50 . 74
0295825 TURNER , JERRY 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 88
0295826 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 523 . 00
0295827 HACKNEY , ANNASTACIA 2001 - 01 - 11 80 . 30
0295828 BRITTAIN , ROSE ANN 2001 - 01 - 11 40 . 17
0295829 MORGAN , JOSEPH C 2001 - 01 - 11 82 . 79
0295830 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES 2001 - 01 - 11 9 . 24
0295831 CARNEVALE , RICHARD 2001 - 01 - 11 63 . 12
0295832 NOLEN , ROBERT J 2001 - 01 - 11 20 . 42
0295833 PERRY , BOLTON 2001 - 01 - 11 46 . 67
0295834 HARRIS , ROSE RILEY 2001 - 01 - 11 28 . 72
0295835 ZHENG , DE SHENG 2001 - 01 - 11 61 . 01
0295836 KEITH , RICHARD 2001 - 01 - 11 31 . 08
1 , 155 , 233 . 78
January 23 , 2001
11
8K 1 16 PG 7 9 7
c
1
5
7. 0 GolfBall Agreement Retrieval Contract - Sandridge Golf Club -
Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 27 , 2000 : s
DATE : December 27 , 2000
y
TO : Honorable Members of Board of County Commissioners
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Ad inistrator
SUBJECT: GOLF BALL RETRIEV GREEMENT
l
FROM : Bob Komarin 6 Ctor of olf
BACKGROUND V, I 1
t
In the past the Sandridge Golf Club has utilized the services of a golf ball retrieval
company to retrieve the golf balls from the lakes on the golf courses . The most recent
agreement was with Mr. Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf to perform such services and
pay the golf course $ 7, 500 . 00 annually . This contract was awarded through the normal
competitive bid process . It was staffs ' third attempt to receive a qualified bid .
During the term of the agreement Mr . Tom Nelson, d/b/a Wabasso Golf requested and
was granted a release from his contract because of health reasons . Mr. Nelson was
released July 1 , 2000 and paid the golf course $2 , 500 . 00 for the portion of the contract . =`
The last few months staff has been trying to find another golf ball Retrieval Company but
has been unsuccessful . The problem appears to be that there are fewer companies doing
that type of work and those who are in the golf ball retrieval business have more than
they can handle .
Staff has recently spoke with Mr. Nelson about the possibility of his company returning
to do the golf ball retrieval at the Sandridge Golf Club Mr . Nelson has proposed to
perform the golf ball retrieval and pay the Sandridge Golf Club five cents commission on
each golf ball retrieved . This commission will be paid on a monthly basis . The Terms of
Agreement would be on a month to month basis . Staff feels that this is a reasonable
solution and the golf course would benefit financially . Attached are a copy of the
proposed contract and a copy of his Liability Insurance .
During this period staff will continue to explore other possibilities .
F
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners allow the Sandrid ; e Golf
Club to enter into a Contract with Mr . Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf to do the golf ball
k
retrieval from the lakes on the golf courses per the terms of the attached Contract
Authorize the Chairman to sign to execute the contract
Attachment Proposed Contract
Certificate of Liability Insurance
January 23 , 2001 fi
12 - - -
B i1PG198
1
5
7. 0 GolfBall Agreement Retrieval Contract - Sandridge Golf Club -
Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 27 , 2000 : s
DATE : December 27 , 2000
y
TO : Honorable Members of Board of County Commissioners
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Ad inistrator
SUBJECT: GOLF BALL RETRIEV GREEMENT
l
FROM : Bob Komarin 6 Ctor of olf
BACKGROUND V, I 1
t
In the past the Sandridge Golf Club has utilized the services of a golf ball retrieval
company to retrieve the golf balls from the lakes on the golf courses . The most recent
agreement was with Mr. Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf to perform such services and
pay the golf course $ 7, 500 . 00 annually . This contract was awarded through the normal
competitive bid process . It was staffs ' third attempt to receive a qualified bid .
During the term of the agreement Mr . Tom Nelson, d/b/a Wabasso Golf requested and
was granted a release from his contract because of health reasons . Mr. Nelson was
released July 1 , 2000 and paid the golf course $2 , 500 . 00 for the portion of the contract . =`
The last few months staff has been trying to find another golf ball Retrieval Company but
has been unsuccessful . The problem appears to be that there are fewer companies doing
that type of work and those who are in the golf ball retrieval business have more than
they can handle .
Staff has recently spoke with Mr. Nelson about the possibility of his company returning
to do the golf ball retrieval at the Sandridge Golf Club Mr . Nelson has proposed to
perform the golf ball retrieval and pay the Sandridge Golf Club five cents commission on
each golf ball retrieved . This commission will be paid on a monthly basis . The Terms of
Agreement would be on a month to month basis . Staff feels that this is a reasonable
solution and the golf course would benefit financially . Attached are a copy of the
proposed contract and a copy of his Liability Insurance .
During this period staff will continue to explore other possibilities .
F
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners allow the Sandrid ; e Golf
Club to enter into a Contract with Mr . Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf to do the golf ball
k
retrieval from the lakes on the golf courses per the terms of the attached Contract
Authorize the Chairman to sign to execute the contract
Attachment Proposed Contract
Certificate of Liability Insurance
January 23 , 2001 fi
12 - - -
B i1PG198
ON MOT1OI� by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved
allowing the Sandridge Golf Club to enter into a contract with
Mr . Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf to do the golf ball retrieval
from the lakes on the golf course per the terms of the proposed
contract and authorized the Chairman to execute same , as
recommended in the memorandum .
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. D. Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement - City of
Sebastian
The Board reviewed a memorandum of January 12 , 2001 :
TO : Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH : James E . Chandler. County Administrator
FROM : Douglas M . Wright. Di ector
Emergency Services
DATE : January 12 , 2001
SUBJECT : Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement
On June 8 . 1993 . the Board of County Commissioners approved an Antenna Space Lease Agreement
between the County and the City of Sebastian for a communications antenna and equipment . The
communication antenna is no longer needed and the equipment has been removed from the site .
RECOMMENDATION :
Staff respectfully requests the Board approve the termination ofthe referenced antenna lease agreement .
ATTACHMENT :
Referenced Lease
January 23 , 2001
13
i PG799
ON MOT1OI� by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved
allowing the Sandridge Golf Club to enter into a contract with
Mr . Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf to do the golf ball retrieval
from the lakes on the golf course per the terms of the proposed
contract and authorized the Chairman to execute same , as
recommended in the memorandum .
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. D. Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement - City of
Sebastian
The Board reviewed a memorandum of January 12 , 2001 :
TO : Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH : James E . Chandler. County Administrator
FROM : Douglas M . Wright. Di ector
Emergency Services
DATE : January 12 , 2001
SUBJECT : Termination of Antenna Space Lease Agreement
On June 8 . 1993 . the Board of County Commissioners approved an Antenna Space Lease Agreement
between the County and the City of Sebastian for a communications antenna and equipment . The
communication antenna is no longer needed and the equipment has been removed from the site .
RECOMMENDATION :
Staff respectfully requests the Board approve the termination ofthe referenced antenna lease agreement .
ATTACHMENT :
Referenced Lease
January 23 , 2001
13
i PG799
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
termination of the antenna lease agreement with the City of
Sebastian , as recommended in the memorandum .
U. Bid Award #3009 - Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects of Four (4)
County Lift Stations - J& H Waterstop . Inc /Roe Construction
Inc./AJV
The Board reviewed a memorandum of January 16 , 2001 :
DATE : Januan• 16, 2001
T0 : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas W. Frame. General Services Director �Ie� C4 . '
FROM : Fran Powell , Purchasing Manager'.}
SUBJECT : Bid Award : IRC 3009 Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects of four (4 ) County Lift
Stations/ Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date : December 6. 2000 at 2 : 00 P. M .
Advertising Dates : November 16 . & 22 . 2000
DemandStar Broadcast to : Fifty one (5 1 ) Vendors
Plans Requested By: Sixteen ( 16 ) Vendors
Replies : One ( 1 ) Vendor
VENDOR BID TOTAL
J& H Waterstop, Inc ./ Rce Construction. Inc/AJV
Orange Cin . Florida $ 74 .640. 00
ESTIMATED BUDGET $ 100. 000 . 00
SOURCE OF FUNDS Renewal & Replacement/Rockridge Sewer Project
471 -000- 1691472 -00 $34 .290. 00
Well Rehab/Lift Stations
411 - 000- 169 -375 -00 $40,350 . 00
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to the sole bidder J & H Waterston, Inc/ Roe Construction . Inc/AJV
as most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. J& H
Waterstop. Inc has successfully performed this type of work for the Count- in earlier projects with same type
of scope . (Reference Bid # 7062 )
January 23 , 2001
14 - —
B I6 PC 800
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
termination of the antenna lease agreement with the City of
Sebastian , as recommended in the memorandum .
U. Bid Award #3009 - Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects of Four (4)
County Lift Stations - J& H Waterstop . Inc /Roe Construction
Inc./AJV
The Board reviewed a memorandum of January 16 , 2001 :
DATE : Januan• 16, 2001
T0 : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas W. Frame. General Services Director �Ie� C4 . '
FROM : Fran Powell , Purchasing Manager'.}
SUBJECT : Bid Award : IRC 3009 Wet Well Rehabilitation Projects of four (4 ) County Lift
Stations/ Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date : December 6. 2000 at 2 : 00 P. M .
Advertising Dates : November 16 . & 22 . 2000
DemandStar Broadcast to : Fifty one (5 1 ) Vendors
Plans Requested By: Sixteen ( 16 ) Vendors
Replies : One ( 1 ) Vendor
VENDOR BID TOTAL
J& H Waterstop, Inc ./ Rce Construction. Inc/AJV
Orange Cin . Florida $ 74 .640. 00
ESTIMATED BUDGET $ 100. 000 . 00
SOURCE OF FUNDS Renewal & Replacement/Rockridge Sewer Project
471 -000- 1691472 -00 $34 .290. 00
Well Rehab/Lift Stations
411 - 000- 169 -375 -00 $40,350 . 00
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to the sole bidder J & H Waterston, Inc/ Roe Construction . Inc/AJV
as most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. J& H
Waterstop. Inc has successfully performed this type of work for the Count- in earlier projects with same type
of scope . (Reference Bid # 7062 )
January 23 , 2001
14 - —
B I6 PC 800
ON M044Wby Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
1&-
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously awarded Bid
# 3009 to the sole bidder, J& H Waterstop/Roe Construction ,
Inc . /AJV , in the amount of $ 74 , 640 , for the wet well
rehabilitation projects of four ( 4 ) County lift stations , as
recommended in the memorandum .
DOCUMENTS WILL BE PLACED ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. F. Declare Equipment SuMlus , for Sale or Disposal
The Board reviewed memoranda of January 3 , 2001 and January 22 , 2001 :
DATE January 3 , 2001
TO : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director
FROM : Fran Boynton-Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT : Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal
BACKGROUND :
The attached list of equipment has been declared excess to the needs of the County and should
be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of Florida State Statutes . The monies received
from this sale will be returned to the appropriate accounts .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare these items surplus and
authorize its sale and/or proper disposal .
January 23 , 2001
15
1 pr
ON M044Wby Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
1&-
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously awarded Bid
# 3009 to the sole bidder, J& H Waterstop/Roe Construction ,
Inc . /AJV , in the amount of $ 74 , 640 , for the wet well
rehabilitation projects of four ( 4 ) County lift stations , as
recommended in the memorandum .
DOCUMENTS WILL BE PLACED ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. F. Declare Equipment SuMlus , for Sale or Disposal
The Board reviewed memoranda of January 3 , 2001 and January 22 , 2001 :
DATE January 3 , 2001
TO : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director
FROM : Fran Boynton-Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT : Declare Equipment Surplus for Sale or Disposal
BACKGROUND :
The attached list of equipment has been declared excess to the needs of the County and should
be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of Florida State Statutes . The monies received
from this sale will be returned to the appropriate accounts .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare these items surplus and
authorize its sale and/or proper disposal .
January 23 , 2001
15
1 pr
Date : January 22, 2001
To : The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru : James E. Chandler, County Administrator 71C►'
From : Thomas W. Frame, General Services Directorwt ccs
Subject: Agenda Correction
Please note that an item on the consent agenda ( 7 . F) Declaration and Disposal of Surplus
Equipment has an error.
On Agenda page 32, seven (7) lines up from the bottom under Utilities are two pieces of
equipment under Fleet # 428 . One item (Asset # 12570) is a 1991 Ford F350 service truck and
attached to it is a Liftmore crane (Asset # 14176). Both of these items were incorrectly requested
to be declared surplus.
In order to correct this error, please delete these two items from the list of items to be declared
surplus under Consent Agenda Item 7 . F .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously declared the
items listed surplus and authorized their sale or proper disposal ,
as recommended in the memorandum .
7. G. Proclamation - City of Fort Pierce - Centennial Celebration
PROCLAMATION
HONORING THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE
ON THEIR
CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION
WHEREAS , in 1831 soldiers of the Second Seminole War constructed a small fort
of palmetto logs on the high banks of the beautiful Indian River , and named it for worthy
commander, Captain Benjamin Pierce ; and
WHEREAS , Florida was only a territory at that time , and in 1845 when Florida
became a State , Fort Pierce was a lonely outpost with a few soldiers , a few Seminole
Indians and even fewer settlers planting pineapples on the high bluff above the River. The
County ' s name was Mosquito County; and
January 23 , 2001
16 - - -
OK I PG 8 0 2
Date : January 22, 2001
To : The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru : James E. Chandler, County Administrator 71C►'
From : Thomas W. Frame, General Services Directorwt ccs
Subject: Agenda Correction
Please note that an item on the consent agenda ( 7 . F) Declaration and Disposal of Surplus
Equipment has an error.
On Agenda page 32, seven (7) lines up from the bottom under Utilities are two pieces of
equipment under Fleet # 428 . One item (Asset # 12570) is a 1991 Ford F350 service truck and
attached to it is a Liftmore crane (Asset # 14176). Both of these items were incorrectly requested
to be declared surplus.
In order to correct this error, please delete these two items from the list of items to be declared
surplus under Consent Agenda Item 7 . F .
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously declared the
items listed surplus and authorized their sale or proper disposal ,
as recommended in the memorandum .
7. G. Proclamation - City of Fort Pierce - Centennial Celebration
PROCLAMATION
HONORING THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE
ON THEIR
CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION
WHEREAS , in 1831 soldiers of the Second Seminole War constructed a small fort
of palmetto logs on the high banks of the beautiful Indian River , and named it for worthy
commander, Captain Benjamin Pierce ; and
WHEREAS , Florida was only a territory at that time , and in 1845 when Florida
became a State , Fort Pierce was a lonely outpost with a few soldiers , a few Seminole
Indians and even fewer settlers planting pineapples on the high bluff above the River. The
County ' s name was Mosquito County; and
January 23 , 2001
16 - - -
OK I PG 8 0 2
WHEREA ty 1894 , when Henry Flagler's Florida East Coast Railroad laid rails
through Fort Pierce , the original Indian River Inlet was still open and the new Fort Pierce
Inlet was twenty years away from being dug . Ships had been carrying fish and oysters ,
pineapples and citrus to northern ports for over three decades through this old Inlet. Yearly
events in this frontier town were the cattle drives from as far away as the Kissimmee Prairie
and the Saint Johns Valley; and
WHEREAS , on February 2 , 1901 , the male registered voters met and organized a
town government, and Fort Pierce was incorporated in what was then Brevard County. By
1905 it was the county seat of a new County, Saint Lucie , that stretched from the Saint
Sebastian River to the northern border of Palm Beach County.
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board , on behalf of the
citizens of Indian River County, wishes the City of Fort Pierce a Very Happy Birthday, with
many more years as our good friend and neighbor.
Adopted this 23rd day of January, 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
77 � H
Caroline D . Ginn , Chaimn
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously proclaimed good
wishes to the City of Fort Pierce on its centennial celebration .
7. H. Indian River Boulevard Construction - Phase IV - Release of
Temporary Construction Easement - Riverfront Groves, Inc /,la
Crazy Woman Properties, Inc
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 12 , 2001 :
January 23 , 2001
17
GK PG 8 0
WHEREA ty 1894 , when Henry Flagler's Florida East Coast Railroad laid rails
through Fort Pierce , the original Indian River Inlet was still open and the new Fort Pierce
Inlet was twenty years away from being dug . Ships had been carrying fish and oysters ,
pineapples and citrus to northern ports for over three decades through this old Inlet. Yearly
events in this frontier town were the cattle drives from as far away as the Kissimmee Prairie
and the Saint Johns Valley; and
WHEREAS , on February 2 , 1901 , the male registered voters met and organized a
town government, and Fort Pierce was incorporated in what was then Brevard County. By
1905 it was the county seat of a new County, Saint Lucie , that stretched from the Saint
Sebastian River to the northern border of Palm Beach County.
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board , on behalf of the
citizens of Indian River County, wishes the City of Fort Pierce a Very Happy Birthday, with
many more years as our good friend and neighbor.
Adopted this 23rd day of January, 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
77 � H
Caroline D . Ginn , Chaimn
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously proclaimed good
wishes to the City of Fort Pierce on its centennial celebration .
7. H. Indian River Boulevard Construction - Phase IV - Release of
Temporary Construction Easement - Riverfront Groves, Inc /,la
Crazy Woman Properties, Inc
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 12 , 2001 :
January 23 , 2001
17
GK PG 8 0
TO : Board of Co my Commissioners
FROM : 1'' �a R . Keller, CLA, Legal Assistant
THROUGH : `�''VIlilliam G . Collins II , Deputy County Attorney
DATE : January 12 , 2001
SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard Construction — Phase IV
Release of Temporary Construction Easement
In 1990 Crazy Woman Properties executed a temporary construction easement to the
County for construction work in connection with the roadway improvements .
The easement contained language stating that " Said Temporary Construction Easement to
be valid until construction of Indian River Boulevard and 4151 Street . . . is complete , which
completion shall be evidenced by 'Release of Temporary Construction Easement' filed in
the public records . . . by Grantee . "
Currently the property is being sold and the attorney examining the title has informed us that
a release has not been executed and recorded on this yet. Therefore , the attorney for the
property owner is requesting the County execute and record the attached Temporary
Construction Easement.
Recommendation : Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached
Release of Temporary Construction Easement on behalf of Indian River County.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved and
authorized the Chairman to execute the proposed Release of
Temporary Construction Easement on behalf of Indian River
County, as recommended in the memorandum .
RECORDED RELEASE OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
U Beach Preservation Plan Pre-Engineering Design Release of
Retainage - Phase I - Applied Technology and Management, Inc
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 16 , 2001 :
January 23 , 2001
TO : Board of Co my Commissioners
FROM : 1'' �a R . Keller, CLA, Legal Assistant
THROUGH : `�''VIlilliam G . Collins II , Deputy County Attorney
DATE : January 12 , 2001
SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard Construction — Phase IV
Release of Temporary Construction Easement
In 1990 Crazy Woman Properties executed a temporary construction easement to the
County for construction work in connection with the roadway improvements .
The easement contained language stating that " Said Temporary Construction Easement to
be valid until construction of Indian River Boulevard and 4151 Street . . . is complete , which
completion shall be evidenced by 'Release of Temporary Construction Easement' filed in
the public records . . . by Grantee . "
Currently the property is being sold and the attorney examining the title has informed us that
a release has not been executed and recorded on this yet. Therefore , the attorney for the
property owner is requesting the County execute and record the attached Temporary
Construction Easement.
Recommendation : Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached
Release of Temporary Construction Easement on behalf of Indian River County.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved and
authorized the Chairman to execute the proposed Release of
Temporary Construction Easement on behalf of Indian River
County, as recommended in the memorandum .
RECORDED RELEASE OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
U Beach Preservation Plan Pre-Engineering Design Release of
Retainage - Phase I - Applied Technology and Management, Inc
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 16 , 2001 :
January 23 , 2001
TO : Jar* E . ' handier ,
' ounty Administrator
THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . , CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works Director
FROM : Jeffrey R . Tabar , P . E . , J
Coastal Engineer l/
SUBJECT : Beach Preservation Plan Pre - Engineering Design
Release of Retainage - Phase I
DATE : January 1E , 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Phase 1 of the project is complete and the consultant is requesting
release of retainage in the amount of $ 41 , 751 . 88 .
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends release of retainaq_ e in the amount of $ 41 , 751 . 88 .
Funding to be from 128 - 144 - 572 - 033 . 19 .
ATTACHMENT
Invoice payment / Release of retainage
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved release
of retainage in the amount of $ 41 . 751 . 88 to Applied Technology
and Management, Inc . , as recommended in the memorandum .
7. 1 Kennedy Groves, Inc Request for Final Plat Approval for Old
Orchid Phase II - Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 8 , 2001 :
January 23 , 2001
19
B ; b PG 805
TO : Jar* E . ' handier ,
' ounty Administrator
THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . , CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works Director
FROM : Jeffrey R . Tabar , P . E . , J
Coastal Engineer l/
SUBJECT : Beach Preservation Plan Pre - Engineering Design
Release of Retainage - Phase I
DATE : January 1E , 2000
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Phase 1 of the project is complete and the consultant is requesting
release of retainage in the amount of $ 41 , 751 . 88 .
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends release of retainaq_ e in the amount of $ 41 , 751 . 88 .
Funding to be from 128 - 144 - 572 - 033 . 19 .
ATTACHMENT
Invoice payment / Release of retainage
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved release
of retainage in the amount of $ 41 . 751 . 88 to Applied Technology
and Management, Inc . , as recommended in the memorandum .
7. 1 Kennedy Groves, Inc Request for Final Plat Approval for Old
Orchid Phase II - Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 8 , 2001 :
January 23 , 2001
19
B ; b PG 805
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DN O HEAD CONCURRENCE :
,
Ro ert M . eating , AICP
Community Development Di ctor
THROUGH : Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM : Mark Zans
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 8 , 2001
SUBJECT : Kennedy Groves, Inc. Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase
II
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DF. SC RiPTION AND ONDITIONS ,
Old Orchid Phase II is a 32 lot 7 . 53 acre portion of a three phase planned development (PD)
project located on the north side of CR 510 and on the east side of Jungle Trail . The property is
zoned PD , Planned Development and has a L -2 land use designation, low density 2 ( up to 6 units
per acre) . The density of the subdivision is 4 . 25 units per acre . Phase I has been constructed and
includes 39 lots . Phase II is encompassed in this final plat and provides for an extension of the
roadway and stormwater tract from Phase I . The remaining overall project is to be constructed in
the subsequent third phase .
At its regular meeting of May 5 , 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Old
Orchid Conceptual PD plan for all three phases . Subsequently, on August 24, 2000} the Planning
and Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plan/plat approval for Old Orchid Phase II . The
developer has obtained a land development permit and has constructed most of the project. Now ,
the developer is requesting final plat approval for Phase II and has submitted the following :
LA final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary PD plat i plan .
' . A certified cost estimate for the remaining required subdivision improvements .
3 . A copy of a contract for construction of the remaining required improvements .
4 . A security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction .
January 23 , 2001
A
20 -
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DN O HEAD CONCURRENCE :
,
Ro ert M . eating , AICP
Community Development Di ctor
THROUGH : Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM : Mark Zans
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 8 , 2001
SUBJECT : Kennedy Groves, Inc. Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase
II
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DF. SC RiPTION AND ONDITIONS ,
Old Orchid Phase II is a 32 lot 7 . 53 acre portion of a three phase planned development (PD)
project located on the north side of CR 510 and on the east side of Jungle Trail . The property is
zoned PD , Planned Development and has a L -2 land use designation, low density 2 ( up to 6 units
per acre) . The density of the subdivision is 4 . 25 units per acre . Phase I has been constructed and
includes 39 lots . Phase II is encompassed in this final plat and provides for an extension of the
roadway and stormwater tract from Phase I . The remaining overall project is to be constructed in
the subsequent third phase .
At its regular meeting of May 5 , 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Old
Orchid Conceptual PD plan for all three phases . Subsequently, on August 24, 2000} the Planning
and Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plan/plat approval for Old Orchid Phase II . The
developer has obtained a land development permit and has constructed most of the project. Now ,
the developer is requesting final plat approval for Phase II and has submitted the following :
LA final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary PD plat i plan .
' . A certified cost estimate for the remaining required subdivision improvements .
3 . A copy of a contract for construction of the remaining required improvements .
4 . A security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction .
January 23 , 2001
A
20 -
ANALYSIS ,
A majority of the required subdivision improvements have been constructed, with the
exception of some infrastructure items and landscaping improvements along the project ' s Jungle
Trail frontage and its east perimeter. The developer has submitted an engineer ' s certified cost
estimate for these remaining items�and staff has approved the cost estimate and security amount.
The developer has made arrangements to submit the appropriate financial security after the Board
of County Commissioners grants final plat approval . The format of the financial security
instrument is approved by the County Attorney ' s Office . The developer also has submitted a
copy of the Contract for Construction of Required Improvements . The contract, which is on a
standard form approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, will be executed by the developer
after the January 23 , 2001 Board meeting date . After final plat approval is granted and the
developer submits the appropriate financial security, staff will have the plat recorded . All
subdivision improvements are privately dedicated with the exception of the utility system , which
is separately warranted through the Department of Utility Services . Therefore, no subdivision
warranty and maintenance agreement is required .
RECOMMENDATION :
Based on the above analysis , staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners , grant
final plat approval for the Old Orchid Phase II and authorize the Chairman to execute the
contract and accept the security.
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Application
2 . Location Map
3 . Plat Graphic
4 . Contract for Construction (Draft )
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Old Orchid Phase II and authorized the
Chairman to execute the Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements and accept the security , as recommended in the
memorandum .
CONTRACT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
January 23 , 2001
21
ANALYSIS ,
A majority of the required subdivision improvements have been constructed, with the
exception of some infrastructure items and landscaping improvements along the project ' s Jungle
Trail frontage and its east perimeter. The developer has submitted an engineer ' s certified cost
estimate for these remaining items�and staff has approved the cost estimate and security amount.
The developer has made arrangements to submit the appropriate financial security after the Board
of County Commissioners grants final plat approval . The format of the financial security
instrument is approved by the County Attorney ' s Office . The developer also has submitted a
copy of the Contract for Construction of Required Improvements . The contract, which is on a
standard form approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, will be executed by the developer
after the January 23 , 2001 Board meeting date . After final plat approval is granted and the
developer submits the appropriate financial security, staff will have the plat recorded . All
subdivision improvements are privately dedicated with the exception of the utility system , which
is separately warranted through the Department of Utility Services . Therefore, no subdivision
warranty and maintenance agreement is required .
RECOMMENDATION :
Based on the above analysis , staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners , grant
final plat approval for the Old Orchid Phase II and authorize the Chairman to execute the
contract and accept the security.
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Application
2 . Location Map
3 . Plat Graphic
4 . Contract for Construction (Draft )
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Old Orchid Phase II and authorized the
Chairman to execute the Contract for Construction of Required
Improvements and accept the security , as recommended in the
memorandum .
CONTRACT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
January 23 , 2001
21
7X Raymo Inc. - Request for Final Plat Approval for River Lake
Estates Subdivision - a Replat of Tract A Copeland 's Landing
Subdivision Phase I
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 15 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DIVI ON HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Robert M . Keating , AITP
Community Development Director
THROUGH : Stan Boling ACP
Planning Director
FROM : John W . McCoy
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 15 , 2001
SUBJECT : Raymo Inc. 's Request for Final Plat Approval for "River Lake Estates", a
Replat of Tract A Copeland ' s Landing Subdivision Phase I
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS :
River Lake Estates Subdivision is a 5 lot subdivision of a 2 . 11 acre platted tract of land located at
the north end of the Copelands Landing Subdivision . That tract is zoned RS - 3 ( residential , single =
fancily up to 3 units/acre ) and is being developed at a density of 2 . 37 units per acre . Originally
platted as a utility plant tract, Tract A was approved to be redeveloped later as residential lots ,
consistent with the subject rep]-at. River Lake Estates is now served by county utilities , and Tract
A is not needed as a utility plant site . Therefore , the tract is being developed as residential lots , as
originally planned .
On January 14, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat approval for
River Lake Estates Subdivision . The developer. Raymo , Inc . . subsequently obtained a county land
development permit and commenced construction . All reouired infrastructure improvements for the
January 23 , 2001
22
B1 170 P 00 $
7X Raymo Inc. - Request for Final Plat Approval for River Lake
Estates Subdivision - a Replat of Tract A Copeland 's Landing
Subdivision Phase I
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 15 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DIVI ON HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Robert M . Keating , AITP
Community Development Director
THROUGH : Stan Boling ACP
Planning Director
FROM : John W . McCoy
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 15 , 2001
SUBJECT : Raymo Inc. 's Request for Final Plat Approval for "River Lake Estates", a
Replat of Tract A Copeland ' s Landing Subdivision Phase I
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS :
River Lake Estates Subdivision is a 5 lot subdivision of a 2 . 11 acre platted tract of land located at
the north end of the Copelands Landing Subdivision . That tract is zoned RS - 3 ( residential , single =
fancily up to 3 units/acre ) and is being developed at a density of 2 . 37 units per acre . Originally
platted as a utility plant tract, Tract A was approved to be redeveloped later as residential lots ,
consistent with the subject rep]-at. River Lake Estates is now served by county utilities , and Tract
A is not needed as a utility plant site . Therefore , the tract is being developed as residential lots , as
originally planned .
On January 14, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat approval for
River Lake Estates Subdivision . The developer. Raymo , Inc . . subsequently obtained a county land
development permit and commenced construction . All reouired infrastructure improvements for the
January 23 , 2001
22
B1 170 P 00 $
development now have been constructed , and a certificate of completion for the subdivision has
been issued by the county Public Works Department . The developer is now requesting final plat
approval and has submitted the following :
1 . A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and
2 . A certificate of completion for required subdivision improvements .
ANALYSIS :
The proposed final plat and subdivision infrastructure improvements have been found to be in
substantial conformance with the preliminary plat. All required improvements have been
constructed and approved by the county Public Works Department and a certificate of completion
has been issued for the subdivision . All of the subdivision improvements , with the exception of
utilities , will be privately dedicated . Therefore , no warranty and maintenance agreements are
required . The utilities will be warranted separately through the Utility Services Department . All
applicable requirements regarding final plat approval have been satisfied .
RECOMMENDATION :
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
plat approval for the River Lake Estates Subdivision .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Application
' - Location Map
3 . Plat Graphic
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the River Lake Estates Subdivision , as
recommended in the memorandum .
7.1. Resolution No. _ 2001 . 008 - Request to Pull Letter of Credit �for
Pelican Pointe Phase II
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 12 , 2 00 1 :
January 23 , 2001
23
BK PG 0 9
development now have been constructed , and a certificate of completion for the subdivision has
been issued by the county Public Works Department . The developer is now requesting final plat
approval and has submitted the following :
1 . A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and
2 . A certificate of completion for required subdivision improvements .
ANALYSIS :
The proposed final plat and subdivision infrastructure improvements have been found to be in
substantial conformance with the preliminary plat. All required improvements have been
constructed and approved by the county Public Works Department and a certificate of completion
has been issued for the subdivision . All of the subdivision improvements , with the exception of
utilities , will be privately dedicated . Therefore , no warranty and maintenance agreements are
required . The utilities will be warranted separately through the Utility Services Department . All
applicable requirements regarding final plat approval have been satisfied .
RECOMMENDATION :
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
plat approval for the River Lake Estates Subdivision .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Application
' - Location Map
3 . Plat Graphic
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the River Lake Estates Subdivision , as
recommended in the memorandum .
7.1. Resolution No. _ 2001 . 008 - Request to Pull Letter of Credit �for
Pelican Pointe Phase II
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 12 , 2 00 1 :
January 23 , 2001
23
BK PG 0 9
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DIV HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Robert M . Keating , AICP L
Community Development Dir ctor
A • 6 •
THROUGH : Stan Boling , AICP
Planning Director
FROM : John W. McCoy � I k
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 12 , 2001
SUBJECT : Request to Pull Letter of Credit for Pelican Pointe Phase II
PD-98-05-08 / 97070035
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
BACKGROUND :
Pelican Pointe Phase II is an approved 15 lot single family planned development ( PD ) . Generally ,
the subject site is located on the west side of the Indian River, just south of Sebastian . More
specifically , the site is located on the east side of the existing Pelican Pointe development, just south
of the marina. Final plat approval for the project was granted April 4 , 2000.
In order to obtain final plat approval , the applicant submitted a letter of credit to guarantee the
construction of required improvements ( e .g . drainage , access , utility improvements ) . As of the date -
of this report, the applicant has not obtained a certificate of completion , a document which confirms
that all required improvements have been completed and inspected . Since the letter of credit is due
to expire on February 1 , 2001 , the Board needs to take action to ensure that the letter of credit can
be pulled prior to February V if the certificate of completion is not issued .
ANALYSIS :
As structured , the LDRs allow project applicants to enter into a contract for construction and bond -
out required subdivision improvements in order to obtain final plat approval . Bonds or other
security instruments ( e . g . letter of credit ) are released by the county once a certificate of completion
has been issued by the county . In this case , the applicant agreed to complete the required subdivision
improvements by November 11 , 2000 according to the contract for construction , but has not
performed in accordance with that approved contract .
The attached resolution , prepared by the County Attorneys office , authorizes staff to pull the letter
of credit. If the applicant obtains a certificate of completion prior to January 26 , 2001 , then staff
will not need to actually pull the letter of credit .
January 23 , 2001
24
8 = ICS u101O
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DIV HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Robert M . Keating , AICP L
Community Development Dir ctor
A • 6 •
THROUGH : Stan Boling , AICP
Planning Director
FROM : John W. McCoy � I k
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 12 , 2001
SUBJECT : Request to Pull Letter of Credit for Pelican Pointe Phase II
PD-98-05-08 / 97070035
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
BACKGROUND :
Pelican Pointe Phase II is an approved 15 lot single family planned development ( PD ) . Generally ,
the subject site is located on the west side of the Indian River, just south of Sebastian . More
specifically , the site is located on the east side of the existing Pelican Pointe development, just south
of the marina. Final plat approval for the project was granted April 4 , 2000.
In order to obtain final plat approval , the applicant submitted a letter of credit to guarantee the
construction of required improvements ( e .g . drainage , access , utility improvements ) . As of the date -
of this report, the applicant has not obtained a certificate of completion , a document which confirms
that all required improvements have been completed and inspected . Since the letter of credit is due
to expire on February 1 , 2001 , the Board needs to take action to ensure that the letter of credit can
be pulled prior to February V if the certificate of completion is not issued .
ANALYSIS :
As structured , the LDRs allow project applicants to enter into a contract for construction and bond -
out required subdivision improvements in order to obtain final plat approval . Bonds or other
security instruments ( e . g . letter of credit ) are released by the county once a certificate of completion
has been issued by the county . In this case , the applicant agreed to complete the required subdivision
improvements by November 11 , 2000 according to the contract for construction , but has not
performed in accordance with that approved contract .
The attached resolution , prepared by the County Attorneys office , authorizes staff to pull the letter
of credit. If the applicant obtains a certificate of completion prior to January 26 , 2001 , then staff
will not need to actually pull the letter of credit .
January 23 , 2001
24
8 = ICS u101O
RECOMMENDATION :
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution
authorizing staff to pull the existing letter of credit .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Location Map
Copy of existing Letter of Credit
3 . Resolution
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No . 2001 - 008 declaring default by Pelican Pointe
Corporation and authorizing draft upon Harbor Federal
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No . 234 .
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - ooa
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, DECLARING DEFAULT BY PELICAN
POINTE CORPORATION , AND AUTHORIZING
DRAFT UPON HARBOR FEDERAL IRREVOCABLE
LETTER OF CREDIT NO , 234 .
WHEREAS , on February 21 , 2000 Pelican Pointe Corporation , by and
through its President , Vernon G . Foster, entered into a Contract for Construction
of Required Improvements No . PD-98-05-08A (97070035 ) , relating to Pelican
Pointe of Sebastian — Phase II Planned Development; and
WHEREAS , that agreement required all subdivision improvements to be
constructed on or before November 1 , 2000 ; and
WHEREAS , that agreement to construct required subdivision
improvements has not been complied with ; and
WHEREAS , in order to guarantee performance of the contract , the
developer provided Harbor Federal Savings Bank letter of credit No . 234 dated
January 23 , 2001
25
10 PG 811
RECOMMENDATION :
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution
authorizing staff to pull the existing letter of credit .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Location Map
Copy of existing Letter of Credit
3 . Resolution
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No . 2001 - 008 declaring default by Pelican Pointe
Corporation and authorizing draft upon Harbor Federal
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No . 234 .
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - ooa
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, DECLARING DEFAULT BY PELICAN
POINTE CORPORATION , AND AUTHORIZING
DRAFT UPON HARBOR FEDERAL IRREVOCABLE
LETTER OF CREDIT NO , 234 .
WHEREAS , on February 21 , 2000 Pelican Pointe Corporation , by and
through its President , Vernon G . Foster, entered into a Contract for Construction
of Required Improvements No . PD-98-05-08A (97070035 ) , relating to Pelican
Pointe of Sebastian — Phase II Planned Development; and
WHEREAS , that agreement required all subdivision improvements to be
constructed on or before November 1 , 2000 ; and
WHEREAS , that agreement to construct required subdivision
improvements has not been complied with ; and
WHEREAS , in order to guarantee performance of the contract , the
developer provided Harbor Federal Savings Bank letter of credit No . 234 dated
January 23 , 2001
25
10 PG 811
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 _ oos
February 1 , 2000 , which was amended March 7 , 2000 to increase the amount to
$ 119 ,475 . 51 ,
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
1 . That Vernon G . Foster as President of Pelican Pointe Corporation
has defaulted under the terms of the aforementioned Contract for Construction of
Required Improvements .
2 . Draft in the amount of $ 119 ,475 . 51 represents the amount required
by the County to fulfill the performance of said Contract for Construction of
Required Improvements .
3 . Office of Management and Budget is directed to present this
Resolution together with a sight draft marked " DRAWN ON IRREVOCABLE
LETTER OF CREDIT NO . 234 OF HARBOR FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK" to the
office of Harbor Federal Savings Bank located at 100 South 2nd Street, Fort
Pierce , Florida 34950 , on or before February 1 , 2001 .
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbridge and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams . _ _ , and , upon being put to
a vote , the vote was as follows :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Ave
Vice Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye_
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 23rd day of January , 2001 .
January 23 , 2001
26
PG812
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 _ oos
February 1 , 2000 , which was amended March 7 , 2000 to increase the amount to
$ 119 ,475 . 51 ,
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
1 . That Vernon G . Foster as President of Pelican Pointe Corporation
has defaulted under the terms of the aforementioned Contract for Construction of
Required Improvements .
2 . Draft in the amount of $ 119 ,475 . 51 represents the amount required
by the County to fulfill the performance of said Contract for Construction of
Required Improvements .
3 . Office of Management and Budget is directed to present this
Resolution together with a sight draft marked " DRAWN ON IRREVOCABLE
LETTER OF CREDIT NO . 234 OF HARBOR FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK" to the
office of Harbor Federal Savings Bank located at 100 South 2nd Street, Fort
Pierce , Florida 34950 , on or before February 1 , 2001 .
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbridge and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams . _ _ , and , upon being put to
a vote , the vote was as follows :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Ave
Vice Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye_
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 23rd day of January , 2001 .
January 23 , 2001
26
PG812
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
By �iLj�ci
Caroline D . Ginn , Chainf6an
ATTEST: Jeffrey 4Bon , Clerk1APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
DeputQY G � y
1 /2001RESO (LEGAL)WGC/nhm 2 WILLIAM G . COLLINS 11
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
7. M. Heron Crest Development Corporation Request or Final
Plat Approval for Heron Crest Subdivision
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 15 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
q
HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Aj fKeating, AI
y Development Diret r
THROUGH : Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM : Mark Zans
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 15 , 2001
SUBJECT : Heron Crest Development Corporation request for Final Plat Approval for
Heron Crest Subdivision .
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
January 23 , 2001
27
BK I PG 013
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
By �iLj�ci
Caroline D . Ginn , Chainf6an
ATTEST: Jeffrey 4Bon , Clerk1APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
DeputQY G � y
1 /2001RESO (LEGAL)WGC/nhm 2 WILLIAM G . COLLINS 11
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
7. M. Heron Crest Development Corporation Request or Final
Plat Approval for Heron Crest Subdivision
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 15 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
q
HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Aj fKeating, AI
y Development Diret r
THROUGH : Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM : Mark Zans
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE : January 15 , 2001
SUBJECT : Heron Crest Development Corporation request for Final Plat Approval for
Heron Crest Subdivision .
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
January 23 , 2001
27
BK I PG 013
DESCRIPTION AND ONDITIONS :
Heron Crest is a 53 lot subdivision of a 20 . 1 acre parcel that is located on the south side of 8`h =
Street about a quarter mile west of 43 `d Avenue . The property is zoned RS -3 ( residential single-
family, up to 3 unit/acre) . The density of the subdivision is 2 . 60 units per acre.
At its regular meeting of April 13 , 2000 the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary plat approval for the subdivision . The applicant is requesting final plat approval for
Heron Crest Subdivision and is bonding out as part of the final plat approval process . The owner,
Heron Crest Development Corporation, through its agent, Knight, McGuire and Associates . Inc . ,
is now requesting final approval and has submitted the following :
1 . A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat.
2 . Certified Engineer' s Cost estimate for remaining improvements .
3 . A Contract for Construction for the remaining required subdivision improvements .
4 . A security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction .
ANALYSIS :
A majority of the required subdivision improvements have been constructed, with the exception
of some infrastructure items . Staff anticipates that all cost estimates and security amounts will be
finalized and approved prior to the Board ' s January 23 ' meeting . The format of the financial
security has been approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, and unit cost estimates for
construction items have been approved by Public Works . The developer also has submitted a
copy of the Contract for Construction of Required Improvements . The contract, which is on a
standard form approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, will be executed by the developer after
the January 23 , 2001 Board meeting date. Once the final cost estimate is approved by staff and
the appropriate financial security is submitted, the plat will be recorded. All subdivision
improvements are privately dedicated with the exception of the utility system , which is separately
warranted through the Department of Utility Services . Therefore. no subdivision warranty and
maintenance agreement is required .
RECOMMENDATION :
Based on the above analysis , staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for the Heron Crest Subdivision, authorize the Chairman to execute the
Contract for Construction and any security documents , and accept the security .
ATTACHMENTS :
I . Application
2 . Location Map
3 . Plat Graphic
4 . Contract for Construction
January 23 , 2001
28
B , G PG 8 14
DESCRIPTION AND ONDITIONS :
Heron Crest is a 53 lot subdivision of a 20 . 1 acre parcel that is located on the south side of 8`h =
Street about a quarter mile west of 43 `d Avenue . The property is zoned RS -3 ( residential single-
family, up to 3 unit/acre) . The density of the subdivision is 2 . 60 units per acre.
At its regular meeting of April 13 , 2000 the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary plat approval for the subdivision . The applicant is requesting final plat approval for
Heron Crest Subdivision and is bonding out as part of the final plat approval process . The owner,
Heron Crest Development Corporation, through its agent, Knight, McGuire and Associates . Inc . ,
is now requesting final approval and has submitted the following :
1 . A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat.
2 . Certified Engineer' s Cost estimate for remaining improvements .
3 . A Contract for Construction for the remaining required subdivision improvements .
4 . A security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction .
ANALYSIS :
A majority of the required subdivision improvements have been constructed, with the exception
of some infrastructure items . Staff anticipates that all cost estimates and security amounts will be
finalized and approved prior to the Board ' s January 23 ' meeting . The format of the financial
security has been approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, and unit cost estimates for
construction items have been approved by Public Works . The developer also has submitted a
copy of the Contract for Construction of Required Improvements . The contract, which is on a
standard form approved by the County Attorney ' s Office, will be executed by the developer after
the January 23 , 2001 Board meeting date. Once the final cost estimate is approved by staff and
the appropriate financial security is submitted, the plat will be recorded. All subdivision
improvements are privately dedicated with the exception of the utility system , which is separately
warranted through the Department of Utility Services . Therefore. no subdivision warranty and
maintenance agreement is required .
RECOMMENDATION :
Based on the above analysis , staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for the Heron Crest Subdivision, authorize the Chairman to execute the
Contract for Construction and any security documents , and accept the security .
ATTACHMENTS :
I . Application
2 . Location Map
3 . Plat Graphic
4 . Contract for Construction
January 23 , 2001
28
B , G PG 8 14
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams . the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Heron Crest Subdivision , authorized the
Chairman to execute the Contract for Construction and anv
security documents , and accepted the security , as recommended
in the memorandum .
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. N. Resolution No. 2001409 - John & Anne Tschinkel ftuest fior
Partial Release of Easement at 5730 Turnberry Lane (Bent Pine
Subdivision Unit 3 and 4)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 17 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DE R MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE :
e /f j 'lot
Robert M . Keating. AICP /
Community Development Di ector
THROUGH : Roland M . DeBlois �AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
R Code Enforcement
FROM : Kelly Zedek
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE : 1 / 17/01
RE : JOHN & ANNE TSCHINKEL REQUEST FOR PARTIAL RELEASE OF
EASEMENT AT 5730 TURNBERRY LN (BENT PINE SUB UNIT 3 & 4)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 . 2001 .
January 23 , 2001
29
BIS 116 PG 8 15
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams . the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Heron Crest Subdivision , authorized the
Chairman to execute the Contract for Construction and anv
security documents , and accepted the security , as recommended
in the memorandum .
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. N. Resolution No. 2001409 - John & Anne Tschinkel ftuest fior
Partial Release of Easement at 5730 Turnberry Lane (Bent Pine
Subdivision Unit 3 and 4)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 17 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DE R MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE :
e /f j 'lot
Robert M . Keating. AICP /
Community Development Di ector
THROUGH : Roland M . DeBlois �AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
R Code Enforcement
FROM : Kelly Zedek
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE : 1 / 17/01
RE : JOHN & ANNE TSCHINKEL REQUEST FOR PARTIAL RELEASE OF
EASEMENT AT 5730 TURNBERRY LN (BENT PINE SUB UNIT 3 & 4)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 . 2001 .
January 23 , 2001
29
BIS 116 PG 8 15
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County has been petitioned by John and Anne Tschinkel, owners of a lot at 5730 Turnberry
Lane in Bent Pine Subdivision, for partial release of a drainage, utility, and golf course maintenance
easement. The purpose of the easement release request is for the construction of a pool, pool deck
and screen ( see attached maps ) .
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The request has been reviewed by Bell South Communications : Florida Power & Light Corporation ;
T . C . I . Cable Corporation ; the Indian River County Utilities Department : the County Road & Bridge
and Engineering Divisions; the County surveyor, and the Bent Pine Community Association . None
of the utility providers or reviewing agencies expressed an objection to the requested partial release
of easement . Therefore, it is staff' s position that the requested easement release would have no
adverse impact to utilities being supplied to the subject properties or to other properties .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the attached resolution , release a portion of
the drainage, utility, and golf course maintenance easement, as more particularly described in said
resolution .
ATTACH WNTS
I . Proposed Countv Itc, olution Ahandunins Easement ( Portion )
_' . N1ap( s ) depictin ,_ easement proposed for release
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No . 2001 - 009 releasing a portion of an easement on
Lot 19 , Unit 3 , of Bent Pine Subdivision Units 3 and 4 ,
January 23 , 2001
30
B { 1 PG816
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County has been petitioned by John and Anne Tschinkel, owners of a lot at 5730 Turnberry
Lane in Bent Pine Subdivision, for partial release of a drainage, utility, and golf course maintenance
easement. The purpose of the easement release request is for the construction of a pool, pool deck
and screen ( see attached maps ) .
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The request has been reviewed by Bell South Communications : Florida Power & Light Corporation ;
T . C . I . Cable Corporation ; the Indian River County Utilities Department : the County Road & Bridge
and Engineering Divisions; the County surveyor, and the Bent Pine Community Association . None
of the utility providers or reviewing agencies expressed an objection to the requested partial release
of easement . Therefore, it is staff' s position that the requested easement release would have no
adverse impact to utilities being supplied to the subject properties or to other properties .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the attached resolution , release a portion of
the drainage, utility, and golf course maintenance easement, as more particularly described in said
resolution .
ATTACH WNTS
I . Proposed Countv Itc, olution Ahandunins Easement ( Portion )
_' . N1ap( s ) depictin ,_ easement proposed for release
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No . 2001 - 009 releasing a portion of an easement on
Lot 19 , Unit 3 , of Bent Pine Subdivision Units 3 and 4 ,
January 23 , 2001
30
B { 1 PG816
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
7 CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
RESOLUTION NO, 2001 . 009 INDIAN RIVER CO.. FLA,
N
CJ1
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING
A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT ON LOT 19, UNIT 31OF BENT PINE t�
E SUBDIVISION UNITS 3 & 4 Cil
a o M
o to
r-1 rn
O1 N
> 1
n� ayi WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in a drainage,utility, and golf course
> w maintenance easement on Lot 19, Unit 3 , of Bent Pine Subdivision Units 3 & 4 ; and
U]
U
WHEREAS, retention of a portion of the easement, as described below, serves no public
E 4 � m purpose ;
E Ln a)
O N PQ
o o NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
m v River County, Florida that: z
H > N)
tD
>
This release of a portion of an easement is executed by Indian River County, a political
.a subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida a
.o 32960, Grantor, to - .
v �
>a
.o
TSCHINKEL, JOHN & ANNE w
n,
Q) 5730 TURNBERRY LN
W VERO BEACH, FL 32960
their successors in interest, heirs and assigns, as Grantee, as follows :
co
!i N Indian River County does hereby release and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may
Cui
ri have in the following described easement portion:
Vi !J Q
!} ` O the southwesterly eight feet of the northeasterly fifty foot wide drainage, utility, and golf
U) O course maintenance rear yard easement of Lot 19, Unit 3, LESSAND EXCEPT the southwesterly
LL seventyfeet and northwesterly fortyfive feet thereof, of Bent Pine Subdivision Units 3 & 4,
N = according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 10, Pages 80 and 80A, of the Public
F c) Records of Indian River County, Florida
< <
>- CoLIJ
CO THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbri dgpseconded
Z O by Commissioner Adam ; and adopted on the 23rd day of
=O _ January 2001 , by the following vote :
C ) Commissioner Caroline D . Ginn Ave
\ Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye .-D
v Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
�4 Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
° Commissioner Fran B . Adams
Aypv
Ix
c�
Ln
1-
January 23 , 2001
31
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
7 CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
RESOLUTION NO, 2001 . 009 INDIAN RIVER CO.. FLA,
N
CJ1
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING
A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT ON LOT 19, UNIT 31OF BENT PINE t�
E SUBDIVISION UNITS 3 & 4 Cil
a o M
o to
r-1 rn
O1 N
> 1
n� ayi WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in a drainage,utility, and golf course
> w maintenance easement on Lot 19, Unit 3 , of Bent Pine Subdivision Units 3 & 4 ; and
U]
U
WHEREAS, retention of a portion of the easement, as described below, serves no public
E 4 � m purpose ;
E Ln a)
O N PQ
o o NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
m v River County, Florida that: z
H > N)
tD
>
This release of a portion of an easement is executed by Indian River County, a political
.a subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida a
.o 32960, Grantor, to - .
v �
>a
.o
TSCHINKEL, JOHN & ANNE w
n,
Q) 5730 TURNBERRY LN
W VERO BEACH, FL 32960
their successors in interest, heirs and assigns, as Grantee, as follows :
co
!i N Indian River County does hereby release and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may
Cui
ri have in the following described easement portion:
Vi !J Q
!} ` O the southwesterly eight feet of the northeasterly fifty foot wide drainage, utility, and golf
U) O course maintenance rear yard easement of Lot 19, Unit 3, LESSAND EXCEPT the southwesterly
LL seventyfeet and northwesterly fortyfive feet thereof, of Bent Pine Subdivision Units 3 & 4,
N = according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 10, Pages 80 and 80A, of the Public
F c) Records of Indian River County, Florida
< <
>- CoLIJ
CO THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbri dgpseconded
Z O by Commissioner Adam ; and adopted on the 23rd day of
=O _ January 2001 , by the following vote :
C ) Commissioner Caroline D . Ginn Ave
\ Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Aye .-D
v Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
�4 Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
° Commissioner Fran B . Adams
Aypv
Ix
c�
Ln
1-
January 23 , 2001
31
RESOLUTION NO, 2001 - ppq
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this _ 23rd da of
January , 2001 . y
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By tit-elt.�cc. '
Carol�` Chairm
;• � F�
Attots+
gputY Qrk
ze
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23rd day of January
2000, by CAROLINE D. GINN, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, and by PATRICIA " PJ " JONES Deputy Clerk for JEFFREY K.
BARTON, Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who are
personally known to me.
NOTARY PUBLIC �^
///it n i►
Printed N ICi—mharl�v F Ma tiin �_ J."ry �rj My COMMISSION CC055434 EXPIRES
Commission No. : CC855436
2003
Commission Expiration:_ July 15 2003 . � �' &ONX0TWTROYYFM1W1tQKEwC
J
�Sl
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
-J
co
Gpm
�+
>
William G. Collins ll _
Deputy County Attorney
rJt
ease.doc C n
proj/apl . no. 200011007925711
January 23 , 2001
32
1 1 .: rG 818
RESOLUTION NO, 2001 - ppq
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this _ 23rd da of
January , 2001 . y
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By tit-elt.�cc. '
Carol�` Chairm
;• � F�
Attots+
gputY Qrk
ze
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23rd day of January
2000, by CAROLINE D. GINN, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, and by PATRICIA " PJ " JONES Deputy Clerk for JEFFREY K.
BARTON, Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, who are
personally known to me.
NOTARY PUBLIC �^
///it n i►
Printed N ICi—mharl�v F Ma tiin �_ J."ry �rj My COMMISSION CC055434 EXPIRES
Commission No. : CC855436
2003
Commission Expiration:_ July 15 2003 . � �' &ONX0TWTROYYFM1W1tQKEwC
J
�Sl
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
-J
co
Gpm
�+
>
William G. Collins ll _
Deputy County Attorney
rJt
ease.doc C n
proj/apl . no. 200011007925711
January 23 , 2001
32
1 1 .: rG 818
7. 0. Annual Countv CountFair
The Board postponed consideration of this item .
9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 010 - FOREST
LAKE PETITION WATER SERVICES - RESOLUTION III
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Utility Services Director Donald R . Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of January 16 ,
2001 :
DATE : JANUARY 16, 2001
TO : JAMES E . CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM : DONALD R. HUBB d
DIRECTOR OF UTILIT S
PREPARED JAMES D . CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OFA ENT PROJECTS
BY : DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT : FOREST LAKE PETITION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO, UW-00-26-DS
RESOLUTION III- PUBLIC HEARING
BACKGROUND
On January 2 , 2001 , the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved
Resolutions I (2001 -004) and Resolution 11 (2001 -005 ) for the above referenced Forest
Lake Petition Water Service Project. Resolution I contained the preliminary assessment
roll describing the project and cost. Resolution II set the date of the public hearing for
the subject project. Property owners have been notified of the public hearing by mail .
Resolution I (2001 -004) was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal on January 8 ,
2001 . (See ATTACHMENTS : 1 - Agenda item and implementation of the above
referenced meeting; 2 - Plat Map ; and 3 - Estimated Project cost . ) . On January 16 , 2001
at 5 : 30 p .m. an informational meeting was held for the benefit of the property owners, in
the Indian River County Board of County Commission Chambers .
January 23 , 2001
33
BKi16PG819
7. 0. Annual Countv CountFair
The Board postponed consideration of this item .
9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 010 - FOREST
LAKE PETITION WATER SERVICES - RESOLUTION III
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Utility Services Director Donald R . Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of January 16 ,
2001 :
DATE : JANUARY 16, 2001
TO : JAMES E . CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM : DONALD R. HUBB d
DIRECTOR OF UTILIT S
PREPARED JAMES D . CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OFA ENT PROJECTS
BY : DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT : FOREST LAKE PETITION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO, UW-00-26-DS
RESOLUTION III- PUBLIC HEARING
BACKGROUND
On January 2 , 2001 , the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved
Resolutions I (2001 -004) and Resolution 11 (2001 -005 ) for the above referenced Forest
Lake Petition Water Service Project. Resolution I contained the preliminary assessment
roll describing the project and cost. Resolution II set the date of the public hearing for
the subject project. Property owners have been notified of the public hearing by mail .
Resolution I (2001 -004) was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal on January 8 ,
2001 . (See ATTACHMENTS : 1 - Agenda item and implementation of the above
referenced meeting; 2 - Plat Map ; and 3 - Estimated Project cost . ) . On January 16 , 2001
at 5 : 30 p .m. an informational meeting was held for the benefit of the property owners, in
the Indian River County Board of County Commission Chambers .
January 23 , 2001
33
BKi16PG819
The Department of Utility Services staff has completed design of the water distribution
system .
ANALYSIS
Of the 38-platted residential lots in Forest Lake, there are 35 lots which may benefit from
this proposed water main -installation . The 24 owners requesting the installation of the
county water system include 18 owner signatures on the petition, and 6 owner signatures
on temporary water service agreements, representing 69% of the 35 lots which may
benefit from this project . The owners of 3 lots on 2 "d Square SW who paid for the
installation of their own water lines and were provided service in July 1997 , are not
included .
Although the streets in Forest Lake are private , the certificate of plat dedicates a
perpetual easement for utility services .
The properties are typically 0 . 53 of an acre, plus or minus . Exceptions include lots as
small as 0 . 43 to as large as 0 . 72 acre . The largest lot has only 63 . 98 feet of street
frontage , whereas typical lots have from 125 to 140 feet of frontage ( one having more
than 180 feet) . Staff is proposing equalization, by not assessing any lot for more than
0. 50 acre. (See ATTACHMENTS : 2 - Plat map which displays the area to benefit from
the assessment project, and 4 - Schedule of Properties ) .
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed
water line route . Funding will be from the Assessment Fund No . 473 -000- 169 - 501 . 00 .
The total estimated projects cost, and amount to be assessed , including engineering and
administration, is $ 191 ,548 . 51 . The estimated assessment cost per square foot is
$ 0 .255075 (rounded) . (See ATTACHMENTS : 4 - Schedule of Properties , and 5 -
Preliminary Assessment Roll . )
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached resolution III , which affirms the preliminary
assessment roll on the subject property.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS :
1 . BCC implementation January 2 , 2001
2 . Plat Map
3 . Estimated Project Cost
4 . Schedule of Properties
5 . Preliminary Assessment Roll
January 23 , 2001
34
0 K I It tS IG020
The Department of Utility Services staff has completed design of the water distribution
system .
ANALYSIS
Of the 38-platted residential lots in Forest Lake, there are 35 lots which may benefit from
this proposed water main -installation . The 24 owners requesting the installation of the
county water system include 18 owner signatures on the petition, and 6 owner signatures
on temporary water service agreements, representing 69% of the 35 lots which may
benefit from this project . The owners of 3 lots on 2 "d Square SW who paid for the
installation of their own water lines and were provided service in July 1997 , are not
included .
Although the streets in Forest Lake are private , the certificate of plat dedicates a
perpetual easement for utility services .
The properties are typically 0 . 53 of an acre, plus or minus . Exceptions include lots as
small as 0 . 43 to as large as 0 . 72 acre . The largest lot has only 63 . 98 feet of street
frontage , whereas typical lots have from 125 to 140 feet of frontage ( one having more
than 180 feet) . Staff is proposing equalization, by not assessing any lot for more than
0. 50 acre. (See ATTACHMENTS : 2 - Plat map which displays the area to benefit from
the assessment project, and 4 - Schedule of Properties ) .
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed
water line route . Funding will be from the Assessment Fund No . 473 -000- 169 - 501 . 00 .
The total estimated projects cost, and amount to be assessed , including engineering and
administration, is $ 191 ,548 . 51 . The estimated assessment cost per square foot is
$ 0 .255075 (rounded) . (See ATTACHMENTS : 4 - Schedule of Properties , and 5 -
Preliminary Assessment Roll . )
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached resolution III , which affirms the preliminary
assessment roll on the subject property.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS :
1 . BCC implementation January 2 , 2001
2 . Plat Map
3 . Estimated Project Cost
4 . Schedule of Properties
5 . Preliminary Assessment Roll
January 23 , 2001
34
0 K I It tS IG020
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter .
Fred Weinkauff, 230 44 `' Terrace SW , President of the Forest Lake Property Owners
Association , stated that 77 % of the residents have requested County water and the board of
directors has approved County water to be brought into their area . He asked the Board of
County Commissioners to approve County water for Forest Lake Subdivision .
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No . 200 1 - 010 confirming the special assessments in
connection with a water main extension to Forest Lake
Subdivision (west of 43 `d Avenue and south of First Street SW) ;
providing for special assessment liens to be made of record .
January 23 , 2001
35
Bit 1 1 '3 PG 8 21
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter .
Fred Weinkauff, 230 44 `' Terrace SW , President of the Forest Lake Property Owners
Association , stated that 77 % of the residents have requested County water and the board of
directors has approved County water to be brought into their area . He asked the Board of
County Commissioners to approve County water for Forest Lake Subdivision .
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No . 200 1 - 010 confirming the special assessments in
connection with a water main extension to Forest Lake
Subdivision (west of 43 `d Avenue and south of First Street SW) ;
providing for special assessment liens to be made of record .
January 23 , 2001
35
Bit 1 1 '3 PG 8 21
Public Hearing (Third Reso . ) 1 /08( reso\torest)Bk/DC
� l IN THE RECORDS OF O
JEFFREY K . BART ON f
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - of o CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO. , FLA,
C .n
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , c^
CONFIRMING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO FOREST LAKE
SUBDIVISION (WEST OF 43rd AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FIRST
STREET , SW) ; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS TO
BE MADE OF RECORD .
0
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has , by
Resolution No . 2001 -004 , adopted January 2 , 2001 , determined to make special L
assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to N.)
Forest Lake Subdivision (west of 43rd Avenue and south of First Street , SW ) ; and
WHEREAS , said resolution described the manner in which said special -
assessments shall be made and how said special assessments are to be paid ; and
w
WHEREAS , the resolution was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal , as
required by Section 206 . 04 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed
C Resolution No . 2001 -005 on January 2 , 2001 , and set a time and place for a public
hearing at which the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested
persons would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said
project and said special assessments , and for the Board to act as required by Section
206 . 07 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in
the Press Journal Newspaper on Friday , January 5 , 2001 , and once again on Friday ,
January 12 , 2001 (twice one week apart ; the last being at least one week prior to the
hearing ) , as required by Section 206 . 06 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , the land owners of record were mailed notices at least ten days prior
to the hearing , as required by Section 206 . 06 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County on
Tuesday , January 23 , 2001 , at 9 : 05 a . m . conducted the public hearing with regard to
the special assessments ;
1J
NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , as follows :
January 23 , 2001
36
B , ) 822
Public Hearing (Third Reso . ) 1 /08( reso\torest)Bk/DC
� l IN THE RECORDS OF O
JEFFREY K . BART ON f
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - of o CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO. , FLA,
C .n
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , c^
CONFIRMING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH A WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO FOREST LAKE
SUBDIVISION (WEST OF 43rd AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FIRST
STREET , SW) ; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS TO
BE MADE OF RECORD .
0
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has , by
Resolution No . 2001 -004 , adopted January 2 , 2001 , determined to make special L
assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to N.)
Forest Lake Subdivision (west of 43rd Avenue and south of First Street , SW ) ; and
WHEREAS , said resolution described the manner in which said special -
assessments shall be made and how said special assessments are to be paid ; and
w
WHEREAS , the resolution was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal , as
required by Section 206 . 04 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed
C Resolution No . 2001 -005 on January 2 , 2001 , and set a time and place for a public
hearing at which the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested
persons would have the chance to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said
project and said special assessments , and for the Board to act as required by Section
206 . 07 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in
the Press Journal Newspaper on Friday , January 5 , 2001 , and once again on Friday ,
January 12 , 2001 (twice one week apart ; the last being at least one week prior to the
hearing ) , as required by Section 206 . 06 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , the land owners of record were mailed notices at least ten days prior
to the hearing , as required by Section 206 . 06 , Indian River County Code ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County on
Tuesday , January 23 , 2001 , at 9 : 05 a . m . conducted the public hearing with regard to
the special assessments ;
1J
NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA , as follows :
January 23 , 2001
36
B , ) 822
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 01 u
1 . The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety .
2 . The special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are hereby
confirmed and approved , and shall remain legal , valid , and binding first liens against
the properties assessed until paid in full .
3 . The Board finds that the properties assessed by this resolution will receive special
benefits equal to or greater than the cost of the assessment .
4 . The County will record the special assessments and this resolution , which describes
the properties assessed and the amounts of the special assessments , on the public
records , which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special
assessments .
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner Macht and , upon being put
to a vote , the vote was as follows :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
23rd day of January , 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
LAst : J . K . Barton , C erk �I
By : �
Caroline D . GinrX
Deputy Cle k Chairman
Attachment : ASSESSMENT ROLL - �
( to be recorded on Public Records )
S C) 1 ti
January 23 , 2001
37
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 01 u
1 . The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety .
2 . The special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are hereby
confirmed and approved , and shall remain legal , valid , and binding first liens against
the properties assessed until paid in full .
3 . The Board finds that the properties assessed by this resolution will receive special
benefits equal to or greater than the cost of the assessment .
4 . The County will record the special assessments and this resolution , which describes
the properties assessed and the amounts of the special assessments , on the public
records , which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special
assessments .
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner Macht and , upon being put
to a vote , the vote was as follows :
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
23rd day of January , 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
LAst : J . K . Barton , C erk �I
By : �
Caroline D . GinrX
Deputy Cle k Chairman
Attachment : ASSESSMENT ROLL - �
( to be recorded on Public Records )
S C) 1 ti
January 23 , 2001
37
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 12-7-2000
J . D . C .
FOREST LAKE -WATER SERVICE
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00001 . 0 SQ . FT . 20 , 909 ASSESSMENT 5 , 333 . 35
OWNER MANTZ , RUSSELL J JR & NORMA A
1815 SW 19TH PL
VERO BEACH , FL 32962
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 1 PBI 10- 99
PROPERTY 4390 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00002 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 51555 . 52
OWNER LIVINGS , WILLIAM H & ROSEMARIE S
4384 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2394
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 2 PBI 10-99
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00003 . 0 SQ FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52 �•
OWNER KYSER . OWEN F & LINDA S
PO BOX 650993
VERO BEACH . FL 32965 -0993
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 3 PBI 10- 99
PROPERTY 4380 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00004 . 0 SQ . FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER, LEIGH MARK O & BARBARA J
4375 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 4 PBI 10- 99
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00005 . 0 SQ FT . 21 , 344 ASSESSMENT 5 . 444 . 31
OWNER LEBOEUF , JANINE A
4371 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 - 2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 5 PBI 10-99 i
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00006 . 0 SQ FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER SILIRIE . MARTIN J & DARLENE M
4367 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395 _
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 6 PBI 10-99 i
L
ATTACHMENT
January 23 , 2001
38
I I FG 824
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 12-7-2000
J . D . C .
FOREST LAKE -WATER SERVICE
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00001 . 0 SQ . FT . 20 , 909 ASSESSMENT 5 , 333 . 35
OWNER MANTZ , RUSSELL J JR & NORMA A
1815 SW 19TH PL
VERO BEACH , FL 32962
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 1 PBI 10- 99
PROPERTY 4390 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00002 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 51555 . 52
OWNER LIVINGS , WILLIAM H & ROSEMARIE S
4384 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2394
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 2 PBI 10-99
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00003 . 0 SQ FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52 �•
OWNER KYSER . OWEN F & LINDA S
PO BOX 650993
VERO BEACH . FL 32965 -0993
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 3 PBI 10- 99
PROPERTY 4380 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00004 . 0 SQ . FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER, LEIGH MARK O & BARBARA J
4375 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 4 PBI 10- 99
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00005 . 0 SQ FT . 21 , 344 ASSESSMENT 5 . 444 . 31
OWNER LEBOEUF , JANINE A
4371 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 - 2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 5 PBI 10-99 i
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00006 . 0 SQ FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER SILIRIE . MARTIN J & DARLENE M
4367 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395 _
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 6 PBI 10-99 i
L
ATTACHMENT
January 23 , 2001
38
I I FG 824
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00007 . 0 SQ _ FT . 20 , 960 ASSESSMENT 57346 . 36
OWNER TANACS , FRANK H `& KATALIN
1027 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH , FL 32960-5317
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 7 PBI 10-99
PROPERTY 4363 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00008 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER HOLFORD , JOHN W
4359 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 8 PBI 10- 99
I
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00009 . 0 SQ . FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER SAROSI . ERNEST & MARIANNE
4356 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 9 TOGETHER WITH ADJACENT FOR OF TR B
AS DESC IN OR BK 662 PP 1680
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00010 . 0 SQ . FT _
OWNER CLAYTON . DAVID LAWRENCE & THERESA 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
4351 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 10
PARCEL * 21 33 39 00002 0000 00011 . 0 SQ FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER WALSH . PHYLLIS D
4347 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2395 _
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99 -
LOT 11
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00012 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER ROMANO , RAYMOND H & BETTY ANN
4343 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395 C
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 12
2
January 23 , 2001
39
SK I I PG 825
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00007 . 0 SQ _ FT . 20 , 960 ASSESSMENT 57346 . 36
OWNER TANACS , FRANK H `& KATALIN
1027 21 ST ST
VERO BEACH , FL 32960-5317
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 7 PBI 10-99
PROPERTY 4363 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00008 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER HOLFORD , JOHN W
4359 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1
LOT 8 PBI 10- 99
I
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00009 . 0 SQ . FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER SAROSI . ERNEST & MARIANNE
4356 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 9 TOGETHER WITH ADJACENT FOR OF TR B
AS DESC IN OR BK 662 PP 1680
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00010 . 0 SQ . FT _
OWNER CLAYTON . DAVID LAWRENCE & THERESA 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
4351 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 10
PARCEL * 21 33 39 00002 0000 00011 . 0 SQ FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER WALSH . PHYLLIS D
4347 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2395 _
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99 -
LOT 11
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00012 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER ROMANO , RAYMOND H & BETTY ANN
4343 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395 C
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 12
2
January 23 , 2001
39
SK I I PG 825
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00013 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER GULBRANDENSEN , GUNNAR E & SUZANNE H
4339 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 13 c
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00014 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER KURTZ , JOHN C & JOY L
4332 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 14
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00015 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER WILLE . RODOLPHE & IRMA ;
4328 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 15
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00016 . 0 SQ FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER. VAN WYK . PETER M & MICHELE T
4324 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 16
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00017 . 0 SQ FT 21 . 344 ASSESSMENT 5 , 444 . 31
OWNER LAMM . WILLIAM C & MERCEDES
4320 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 17
c�
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00018 . 0 SQ FT . 20 . 800 ASSESSMENT 5 , 305 . 55
OWNER RUBIO , MIGUEL E & MARTHA O
MAIL 4316 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 - 99
LOT 18
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00019 . 0 SQ FT . 18 , 750 ASSESSMENT 4 , 782 . 65
OWNER MONTGOMERY , JOAN
MAIL 4312 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99 '
LOT 19 =
3
January 23 , 2001
40
BIS I I FIG 826
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00013 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER GULBRANDENSEN , GUNNAR E & SUZANNE H
4339 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2395
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 13 c
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00014 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER KURTZ , JOHN C & JOY L
4332 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 14
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00015 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER WILLE . RODOLPHE & IRMA ;
4328 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 15
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00016 . 0 SQ FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER. VAN WYK . PETER M & MICHELE T
4324 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 16
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00017 . 0 SQ FT 21 . 344 ASSESSMENT 5 , 444 . 31
OWNER LAMM . WILLIAM C & MERCEDES
4320 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 17
c�
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00018 . 0 SQ FT . 20 . 800 ASSESSMENT 5 , 305 . 55
OWNER RUBIO , MIGUEL E & MARTHA O
MAIL 4316 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 - 99
LOT 18
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00019 . 0 SQ FT . 18 , 750 ASSESSMENT 4 , 782 . 65
OWNER MONTGOMERY , JOAN
MAIL 4312 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99 '
LOT 19 =
3
January 23 , 2001
40
BIS I I FIG 826
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00020 . 0 SQ . FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER MCCORRISON . ROBERT M & KIMBERLY L
MAIL 4308 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 20
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00021 . 0 SQ . FT . 20 , 909 ASSESSMENT 5 . 333 . 35
OWNER BURLESON , SAM E JR
MAIL 4304 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 - 99 +
LOT 21
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00022 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER MAXWELL . THOMAS E & GLENNA H
MAIL 145 TIMBERCREST DR
RIDGELAND , MS 39157
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 22
PROPERTY 4311 2ND SQUARE SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00023 . 0 SQ FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER BYLSMA , MARY FAITH
MAIL 4307 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2379
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 - 99
LOT 23 f
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00024 . 0 SQ FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER VISTA LINDA PROPERTIES NV INC
MAIL 437 STANTON PL
LONGWOOD . FL 32779
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99 i
LOT 24
PROPERTY 4305 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00025 . 0 SQ . FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER MCAULIFFE , HENRY E`& ADELE G
MAIL 4393 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2396
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 25
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00026 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER FOELSKE , KLAUS % FRED R TUERPE -
PO BOX 160038
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS , FL 32716 --
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 -99
LOT 26 `
PROPERTY 4385 SECOND SQ SW
C
4
January 23 , 2001
41
K I FIG 827
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00020 . 0 SQ . FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER MCCORRISON . ROBERT M & KIMBERLY L
MAIL 4308 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 20
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00021 . 0 SQ . FT . 20 , 909 ASSESSMENT 5 . 333 . 35
OWNER BURLESON , SAM E JR
MAIL 4304 2ND SQUARE SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2378
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 - 99 +
LOT 21
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00022 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER MAXWELL . THOMAS E & GLENNA H
MAIL 145 TIMBERCREST DR
RIDGELAND , MS 39157
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 22
PROPERTY 4311 2ND SQUARE SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00023 . 0 SQ FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER BYLSMA , MARY FAITH
MAIL 4307 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2379
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 - 99
LOT 23 f
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00024 . 0 SQ FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER VISTA LINDA PROPERTIES NV INC
MAIL 437 STANTON PL
LONGWOOD . FL 32779
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99 i
LOT 24
PROPERTY 4305 2ND SQ SW
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00025 . 0 SQ . FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER MCAULIFFE , HENRY E`& ADELE G
MAIL 4393 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2396
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 25
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00026 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER FOELSKE , KLAUS % FRED R TUERPE -
PO BOX 160038
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS , FL 32716 --
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 -99
LOT 26 `
PROPERTY 4385 SECOND SQ SW
C
4
January 23 , 2001
41
K I FIG 827
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00027 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER SAROUSI , MARIANNE (TR)(TOK)
4356 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 27 J
I
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00028 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER BASSO , SILVIO A & CONSTANCE B
4352 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 28
r
PARCEL * 21 33 39 00002 0000 00029 . 0 SQ . FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER IPPOLITO . GEORGE J SR ( LE )
4348 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 -99
LOT 29
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00030 . 0 SQ . FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER WIDELL , DOUGLAS J & WELKER . MARIA LEE
4344 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 30
PARCEL * 21 33 39 00002 0000 00031 . 0 SQ . FT , 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER VERHOEVEN . STEPHEN C & SHERRIE B
4340 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2393 a
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99 _
LOT 31
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00003 0000 00005 . 0 SQ . FT , 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER STORK , BRIAN D
220 44TH TERR SW _
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2392 C
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 -77 I
LOT 5
5
January 23 , 2001
42
BK 1 116 Or, 0- 2 8
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00027 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER SAROUSI , MARIANNE (TR)(TOK)
4356 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99
LOT 27 J
I
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00028 . 0 SQ . FT . 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
OWNER BASSO , SILVIO A & CONSTANCE B
4352 2ND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 28
r
PARCEL * 21 33 39 00002 0000 00029 . 0 SQ . FT 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER IPPOLITO . GEORGE J SR ( LE )
4348 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10 -99
LOT 29
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00002 0000 00030 . 0 SQ . FT 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER WIDELL , DOUGLAS J & WELKER . MARIA LEE
4344 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968 -2393
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10- 99
LOT 30
PARCEL * 21 33 39 00002 0000 00031 . 0 SQ . FT , 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER VERHOEVEN . STEPHEN C & SHERRIE B
4340 SECOND SQ SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2393 a
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 1 PBI 10-99 _
LOT 31
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00003 0000 00005 . 0 SQ . FT , 21 . 780 ASSESSMENT 5 . 555 . 52
OWNER STORK , BRIAN D
220 44TH TERR SW _
VERO BEACH . FL 32968-2392 C
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 -77 I
LOT 5
5
January 23 , 2001
42
BK 1 116 Or, 0- 2 8
PARCEL # 21 33 39 O00O3 0000 00006 . 0 SQ FT ,
OWNER WEINKAUFF , FRED & BARBARA 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
230 44TH TERR SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2392
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 - 77
LOT 6
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00003 0000 00007 . 0 SQ . FT
OWNER KORN , PAULINE & WILLIAMS , JOAN A 19 . 182 ASSESSMENT 4 , 892 . 84
240 44TH TERR SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2392
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 -77
LOT 7 LESS FOLL DESC PARCEL BEG AT SWLY COR OF LOT 7
WHERE S LINE INTERSECTS THE E R/W OF CUL-DE- SAC , TH S 88
DEG 00 MIN 45 SEC E ALONG COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 7 & 8
82 48 FT , TH N 01 DEG 22 MIN 20 SEC W 17 . 95 FT . TH S 80 DEG 32
MIN 32 SEC W 83 . 07 FT TO POB
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00003 0000 00007 . 1 SQ FT . 20 . 473 ASSESSMENT 5 . 222 . 14
OWNER DECAPRIO , DOLORES D & GARRIS . CHARLES E
260 44TH TERR SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2392
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 - 77
A PART OF LOT 7 DESC AS FOLL : BEG AT SWLY COR OF LOT 7 WHERE S LINE
INTERSECTS E R/W OF CUL- DE- SAC . TH S 88 DEG 00 MIN 45 SEC E ALONG :mq
COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 7 & 8 82 . 48 FT . TH N O1 DEG 22 MIN 20 SEC
W 17 . 95 FT TH S 80 DEG 32 MIN 32 SEC W 83 07 FT TO POB & ALL OF LOT 8
TOTAL ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE
750 . 951
ASSESSED
ESTIMATED COST PER SQUARE FOOT 50 25507457876
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT TOTAL
S 191 . 548 . 51
J
s
6
January 23 , 2001
43
PARCEL # 21 33 39 O00O3 0000 00006 . 0 SQ FT ,
OWNER WEINKAUFF , FRED & BARBARA 21 , 780 ASSESSMENT 5 , 555 . 52
230 44TH TERR SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2392
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 - 77
LOT 6
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00003 0000 00007 . 0 SQ . FT
OWNER KORN , PAULINE & WILLIAMS , JOAN A 19 . 182 ASSESSMENT 4 , 892 . 84
240 44TH TERR SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2392
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 -77
LOT 7 LESS FOLL DESC PARCEL BEG AT SWLY COR OF LOT 7
WHERE S LINE INTERSECTS THE E R/W OF CUL-DE- SAC , TH S 88
DEG 00 MIN 45 SEC E ALONG COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 7 & 8
82 48 FT , TH N 01 DEG 22 MIN 20 SEC W 17 . 95 FT . TH S 80 DEG 32
MIN 32 SEC W 83 . 07 FT TO POB
PARCEL # 21 33 39 00003 0000 00007 . 1 SQ FT . 20 . 473 ASSESSMENT 5 . 222 . 14
OWNER DECAPRIO , DOLORES D & GARRIS . CHARLES E
260 44TH TERR SW
VERO BEACH , FL 32968-2392
LEGAL FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 PBI 11 - 77
A PART OF LOT 7 DESC AS FOLL : BEG AT SWLY COR OF LOT 7 WHERE S LINE
INTERSECTS E R/W OF CUL- DE- SAC . TH S 88 DEG 00 MIN 45 SEC E ALONG :mq
COMMON LINE BETWEEN LOTS 7 & 8 82 . 48 FT . TH N O1 DEG 22 MIN 20 SEC
W 17 . 95 FT TH S 80 DEG 32 MIN 32 SEC W 83 07 FT TO POB & ALL OF LOT 8
TOTAL ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE
750 . 951
ASSESSED
ESTIMATED COST PER SQUARE FOOT 50 25507457876
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT TOTAL
S 191 . 548 . 51
J
s
6
January 23 , 2001
43
9 . Ael PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO , 2001 - 002 — FRANK
BARATTA ' S REQUEST TO REZONE ±32 . 36 ACRES FROM A4 TO
RM-4 RM - 6 (Quas14udicial�
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M . Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
January 16 , 2001 and used a Power Point® outline (placed on file in the office of the
Clerk to the Board ) to enhance his presentation :
TO : James E . Chandler ; County Administrator
P "I HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating, MC ; Commurange
evelopment Director
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani, AICP ; Chief, Long- Planning
FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long-Range Plauninv'`L /
DATE : January 16, 2001
RE : Frank Baratta ' s Request to Rezone ±32 .36 Acres from A- 1 to RM-8
(RZON 2000-11 -0017)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This request is to rezone ±32.36 acres of a ±46 . 45 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of SR
60 and 74" Avenue. While the entire ±46 . 45 acre parcel is currently owned by Frank Baratta. the
Richman Group of Florida, Inc . intends to buy and develop the ± 32 . 36 acre subject property .
The applicant ' s request is to rezone the ±32 . 36 acre "L" shaped subject property , depicted in Figure
1 , from A - 1 , Agricultural District ( up to 1 unit/5 acres) , to RM - 8 . Multiple- Family Residential
District ( up to 8 units/acre ) . The purpose of the applicant ' s request is to secure the zoning necessary
to develop the site with a residential use at a density that is consistent with its comprehensive plan
land use designation .
For reasons detailed in the analysis section of this staff report , county planning staff contacted Mr.
Baratta and requested him to amend the rezoning request to include the remaining ± 14 . 09 acres of
the parcel . Citing concerns about a possible property tax increase, Mr . Baratta declined to amend
the request .
January 23 , 2001
P44
' 1 030
9 . Ael PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE NO , 2001 - 002 — FRANK
BARATTA ' S REQUEST TO REZONE ±32 . 36 ACRES FROM A4 TO
RM-4 RM - 6 (Quas14udicial�
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert M . Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
January 16 , 2001 and used a Power Point® outline (placed on file in the office of the
Clerk to the Board ) to enhance his presentation :
TO : James E . Chandler ; County Administrator
P "I HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating, MC ; Commurange
evelopment Director
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani, AICP ; Chief, Long- Planning
FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long-Range Plauninv'`L /
DATE : January 16, 2001
RE : Frank Baratta ' s Request to Rezone ±32 .36 Acres from A- 1 to RM-8
(RZON 2000-11 -0017)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This request is to rezone ±32.36 acres of a ±46 . 45 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of SR
60 and 74" Avenue. While the entire ±46 . 45 acre parcel is currently owned by Frank Baratta. the
Richman Group of Florida, Inc . intends to buy and develop the ± 32 . 36 acre subject property .
The applicant ' s request is to rezone the ±32 . 36 acre "L" shaped subject property , depicted in Figure
1 , from A - 1 , Agricultural District ( up to 1 unit/5 acres) , to RM - 8 . Multiple- Family Residential
District ( up to 8 units/acre ) . The purpose of the applicant ' s request is to secure the zoning necessary
to develop the site with a residential use at a density that is consistent with its comprehensive plan
land use designation .
For reasons detailed in the analysis section of this staff report , county planning staff contacted Mr.
Baratta and requested him to amend the rezoning request to include the remaining ± 14 . 09 acres of
the parcel . Citing concerns about a possible property tax increase, Mr . Baratta declined to amend
the request .
January 23 , 2001
P44
' 1 030
On January 11 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4 to 3 to recommend that the
Board of County Commiss
RM- 8 . ioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A - 1 to
Figure 1 : Zoning and Location of the Subject Property
LJ5 I R7 toll .
RM - 8 A � 1 1 -- -
RMH - 8 -- /
ma.
RMIR
RM - 4
Y Y.
PR ° = ..
.. _:
Meg
20th S
TR9 rN TE 12 TR10
Wage
-. ygas
games
all
R RM } 6 A - 1 _ =4 'RW fr.
loansme r, - 6
sea � 1Ip
_. L. — --
man .. _ ,.
IF
> TR-13 __ _ R14 of
ago
I W
..�
eVII eggs
ggs
v
b 'gI IF_. ' • F a as iuc
i7 7Ca via tua
—
i � A - 1 ; r i
4 q R - 68 i
_ _ same, AW, . . I
• L • e
16th Street • age5- 6 b
7R1 TR4 , AS i� Image , , TR2
game
IPDTMD
( Pointe est)
i Named,
—t Y , YY
= -- I �. Samoa,
I! Y .L tlf IG YI C {Y K " As I r —
z
Existing Land Use Pattern
The entire ±46 . 45 acre parcel containing the subject property is zoned A- 1 and contains citrus groves
that are currently inactive . To the south of the subject property, land along 74"i Avenue also consists
of A- 1 zoned citrus groves . East of those groves are single- family residences on large ( 1 . 5 acres to
5 acres) , wooded, A- 1 zoned lots. Land bordering the subject property on the east and southeast
consists of single family subdivisions zoned RS -6 , Single-Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acre) .
January 23 , 2001
45
B1 �
Id31
On January 11 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4 to 3 to recommend that the
Board of County Commiss
RM- 8 . ioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A - 1 to
Figure 1 : Zoning and Location of the Subject Property
LJ5 I R7 toll .
RM - 8 A � 1 1 -- -
RMH - 8 -- /
ma.
RMIR
RM - 4
Y Y.
PR ° = ..
.. _:
Meg
20th S
TR9 rN TE 12 TR10
Wage
-. ygas
games
all
R RM } 6 A - 1 _ =4 'RW fr.
loansme r, - 6
sea � 1Ip
_. L. — --
man .. _ ,.
IF
> TR-13 __ _ R14 of
ago
I W
..�
eVII eggs
ggs
v
b 'gI IF_. ' • F a as iuc
i7 7Ca via tua
—
i � A - 1 ; r i
4 q R - 68 i
_ _ same, AW, . . I
• L • e
16th Street • age5- 6 b
7R1 TR4 , AS i� Image , , TR2
game
IPDTMD
( Pointe est)
i Named,
—t Y , YY
= -- I �. Samoa,
I! Y .L tlf IG YI C {Y K " As I r —
z
Existing Land Use Pattern
The entire ±46 . 45 acre parcel containing the subject property is zoned A- 1 and contains citrus groves
that are currently inactive . To the south of the subject property, land along 74"i Avenue also consists
of A- 1 zoned citrus groves . East of those groves are single- family residences on large ( 1 . 5 acres to
5 acres) , wooded, A- 1 zoned lots. Land bordering the subject property on the east and southeast
consists of single family subdivisions zoned RS -6 , Single-Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acre) .
January 23 , 2001
45
B1 �
Id31
At the northeast corner of SR 60 and 74 "' Avenue is the Village Green Mobile Home Park, zoned
RMH- 8 , Mobile Home Residential District ( up to 8 units/acre). East of the mobile home park is A- 1
zoned land containing agricultural offices.
Land at the northwest corner of SR 60 and 74`" Avenue is vacant and is zoned PRO, Professional
Office District . Abutting the PRO zoned land on the north and west is the Indian River Estates
multiple- family and assisted living facility project. That project is zoned RM- 8 , Multiple-Family
Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) .
To the west of the subject property, across 74`" Avenue and the Range Line Canal, the land has
several zoning districts . At the southwest comer of SR 60 and 74`h Avenue, the land is zoned CN,
Neighborhood Commercial , and contains the Seald Sweet Office Building. South of the Scald Sweet
building, land is zoned either RM-6 , Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) , or A-
1 , and contains single- family homes on five and ten acre lots .
Future Land Use Pattern
The subject property and all surrounding properties are designated M- 1 , Medium - Density
Residential - 1 , on the county future land use map . The M- I designation permits residential uses with
densities up to 8 units/acre .
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive
by the comprehensive plan . No wetlands or native upland plant communities exist on site .
According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard
areas .
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county . Wastewater collection lines extend to the
site from the West Region Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water distribution lines extend
to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant.
Transportation System
The site is bounded on the north by SR 60 . Classified as an urban principal arterial roadway on the
future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of SR 60 is a four lane road with approximately
165 feet of public road right-of-way. By 2005 , the Florida Department of Transportation plans to
begin construction to expand the portion of SR 60 between 66 h Avenue and Interstate 95 from four
lanes to six lanes .
The site is bounded on the west by 74 h Avenue . Classified as a rural major collector roadway on
the future roadway thoroughfare plan map , this segment of 74 ' Avenue is an unpaved road with
approximately 30 feet of public road right-of-way . The portion of 74 h Avenue extending from SR
60 to 12 `h Street is programmed to be paved by the end of 2001 .
ANALYSIS
In this section , an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented .
Specifically, this section will include :
January 23 , 2001
46
x ' 116 832
At the northeast corner of SR 60 and 74 "' Avenue is the Village Green Mobile Home Park, zoned
RMH- 8 , Mobile Home Residential District ( up to 8 units/acre). East of the mobile home park is A- 1
zoned land containing agricultural offices.
Land at the northwest corner of SR 60 and 74`" Avenue is vacant and is zoned PRO, Professional
Office District . Abutting the PRO zoned land on the north and west is the Indian River Estates
multiple- family and assisted living facility project. That project is zoned RM- 8 , Multiple-Family
Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) .
To the west of the subject property, across 74`" Avenue and the Range Line Canal, the land has
several zoning districts . At the southwest comer of SR 60 and 74`h Avenue, the land is zoned CN,
Neighborhood Commercial , and contains the Seald Sweet Office Building. South of the Scald Sweet
building, land is zoned either RM-6 , Multiple-Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) , or A-
1 , and contains single- family homes on five and ten acre lots .
Future Land Use Pattern
The subject property and all surrounding properties are designated M- 1 , Medium - Density
Residential - 1 , on the county future land use map . The M- I designation permits residential uses with
densities up to 8 units/acre .
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive
by the comprehensive plan . No wetlands or native upland plant communities exist on site .
According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard
areas .
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county . Wastewater collection lines extend to the
site from the West Region Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water distribution lines extend
to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant.
Transportation System
The site is bounded on the north by SR 60 . Classified as an urban principal arterial roadway on the
future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of SR 60 is a four lane road with approximately
165 feet of public road right-of-way. By 2005 , the Florida Department of Transportation plans to
begin construction to expand the portion of SR 60 between 66 h Avenue and Interstate 95 from four
lanes to six lanes .
The site is bounded on the west by 74 h Avenue . Classified as a rural major collector roadway on
the future roadway thoroughfare plan map , this segment of 74 ' Avenue is an unpaved road with
approximately 30 feet of public road right-of-way . The portion of 74 h Avenue extending from SR
60 to 12 `h Street is programmed to be paved by the end of 2001 .
ANALYSIS
In this section , an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented .
Specifically, this section will include :
January 23 , 2001
46
x ' 116 832
• an analysis of the request ' s impact on public facilities ;
• an analysis of the request ' s consistency with the county ' s comprehensive plan ;
0 an analysis of the request ' s compatibility with the surrounding area ; and
• an analysis of the request ' s potential impact on environmental quality .
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is located within the county ' s Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development . The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for : Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management and Recreation . The adequate provision of these
services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community . The
Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development
be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are
maintained .
Policy 3 . 2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element . For rezoning requests , conditional concurrency review is required .
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects , county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning . For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County ' s _
LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property
and the maximum density under the proposed zoning . The site information used for the concurrencv
analysis is as follows :
1 . Size of Area to be Rezoned : ±32 .36 acres
2 . Existing Zoning District : A- 1 , Agricultural District (up to l unit/5 acres )
3 . Proposed Zoning District : RM-8, Multiple-Family Residential District ( up to
8 units/acre)
4 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning District : 6 Single-Family Units
5 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District : 258 Single-Family Units
Tr nspaaation
As pan of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA) . The county ' s Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA . A TIA
reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips
to impacted roads . Impacted roads are defined in the county ' s LDRs as roadway segments which
receive five percent (5 %) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever
is less .
According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roads would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 258 single-family units on the subject property .
January 23 , 2001
47
• an analysis of the request ' s impact on public facilities ;
• an analysis of the request ' s consistency with the county ' s comprehensive plan ;
0 an analysis of the request ' s compatibility with the surrounding area ; and
• an analysis of the request ' s potential impact on environmental quality .
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is located within the county ' s Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development . The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for : Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management and Recreation . The adequate provision of these
services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community . The
Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development
be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are
maintained .
Policy 3 . 2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element . For rezoning requests , conditional concurrency review is required .
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects , county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning . For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County ' s _
LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property
and the maximum density under the proposed zoning . The site information used for the concurrencv
analysis is as follows :
1 . Size of Area to be Rezoned : ±32 .36 acres
2 . Existing Zoning District : A- 1 , Agricultural District (up to l unit/5 acres )
3 . Proposed Zoning District : RM-8, Multiple-Family Residential District ( up to
8 units/acre)
4 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning District : 6 Single-Family Units
5 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District : 258 Single-Family Units
Tr nspaaation
As pan of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA) . The county ' s Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA . A TIA
reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips
to impacted roads . Impacted roads are defined in the county ' s LDRs as roadway segments which
receive five percent (5 %) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever
is less .
According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roads would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 258 single-family units on the subject property .
January 23 , 2001
47
g „
A � i
"
. n
M
"b +y
u,
iN
x1'
`}z
Water
-NI With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 258 residential units, resulting
in water consumption at a rate of 258 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU) , or 64, 500 gallons/day .
This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property
would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining
capacity of approximately 3 , 900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand r
generated by the proposed rezoning .
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property _
will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 258 Equivalent Residential Units ( ERU) , ,
or 64 , 500 gallons/day . This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day . = ss
County wastewater service is available to the site from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 875 , 000 gallons/day and can
accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request.
Solid Waste
'° Solid waste seryice includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill . The rY
f :
county ' s adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/year. With
the county ' s average of approximately 2 . 3 persons/unit, a 258 unit residential development would n
Z3 be anticipated to house approximately 593 people (2 . 3 X 258 ). For the subject request to meet the
county ' s adopted level of service standard of 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have
enough capacity to accommodate approximately 1 , 169 ( 593 X 1 . 97 ) cubic yards/year.
z
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the M
r'
availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards . The active segment of the landfill has a 4 year
capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010 . Based on the analysis , staff
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed zoning district.
Stormwater Management
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations . In ;
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance . Since the site is located within the M- I Drainage Basin and the Indian
River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD) , development on the property will be prohibited
from discharging any runoff in excess of 2 inches in a 24 hour period, which is the approved
IRFWCD discharge rate. `
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property
does not lie within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply.
F ." With the most intense use of this site under the proposed amendment, the maximum area of
impervious surface would be approximately 22 . 7 acres . The maximum runoff volume , based on that
amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD 2 inch
discharge requirement, would be approximately 996 , 797 cubic feet . In order to maintain the
lI'All county ' s adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain approximately 761 , 862
January 23 , 2001
48
8t
va t
g „
A � i
"
. n
M
"b +y
u,
iN
x1'
`}z
Water
-NI With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 258 residential units, resulting
in water consumption at a rate of 258 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU) , or 64, 500 gallons/day .
This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property
would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining
capacity of approximately 3 , 900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand r
generated by the proposed rezoning .
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property _
will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 258 Equivalent Residential Units ( ERU) , ,
or 64 , 500 gallons/day . This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day . = ss
County wastewater service is available to the site from the West Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 875 , 000 gallons/day and can
accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request.
Solid Waste
'° Solid waste seryice includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill . The rY
f :
county ' s adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/year. With
the county ' s average of approximately 2 . 3 persons/unit, a 258 unit residential development would n
Z3 be anticipated to house approximately 593 people (2 . 3 X 258 ). For the subject request to meet the
county ' s adopted level of service standard of 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have
enough capacity to accommodate approximately 1 , 169 ( 593 X 1 . 97 ) cubic yards/year.
z
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the M
r'
availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards . The active segment of the landfill has a 4 year
capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010 . Based on the analysis , staff
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed zoning district.
Stormwater Management
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations . In ;
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance . Since the site is located within the M- I Drainage Basin and the Indian
River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD) , development on the property will be prohibited
from discharging any runoff in excess of 2 inches in a 24 hour period, which is the approved
IRFWCD discharge rate. `
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property
does not lie within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply.
F ." With the most intense use of this site under the proposed amendment, the maximum area of
impervious surface would be approximately 22 . 7 acres . The maximum runoff volume , based on that
amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD 2 inch
discharge requirement, would be approximately 996 , 797 cubic feet . In order to maintain the
lI'All county ' s adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain approximately 761 , 862
January 23 , 2001
48
8t
va t
a
a
r
r "
a
cubic feet of runoff on-site . With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that
the pre-development runoff rate is 68 cubic feet/ second .
Based upon the County Engineering Division ' s analysis , the stormwater management level of q,
service standard would be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD ' s maximum discharge
rate of 2 inches in 24 hours, and requiring retention of the 761 , 862 cubic feet of runoff for the most _
intense use of the property.
As with all development, a more detailed drainage review will be conducted during the development
approval process .
Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most E
intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates
that the adopted levels of service would be maintained . The following table illustrates the additional
�faqypark demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus park +
acreage .
PARK INFORMATION
t as
LOS ( Acres per 1 , 000 Population) Project Demand ( Acres ) Surplus Park Acreage
4 . 0 2 . 064 1 , 164
1 ,<
Concurrency Summary
Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency-mandated facilities ,
including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to
accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district .
#£ Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request.
1 :
I If If
vl
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
� ^ f
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan .
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
P
Land Use Map , which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities . Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County .
r
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community ' s development . As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions . While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests . Of particular
applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies .
Future Land IJge Fl m nt Objective 1
Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern .
By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with the site ' s land use
designation, the request facilitates the creation of a more compact and efficient land use pattern
within the urban service area, while maintaining the county ' s overall low density character. For
these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1 .
January 23 , 2001If
49
" If 11
� I 0 rG 335
icx x
a
a
r
r "
a
cubic feet of runoff on-site . With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that
the pre-development runoff rate is 68 cubic feet/ second .
Based upon the County Engineering Division ' s analysis , the stormwater management level of q,
service standard would be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD ' s maximum discharge
rate of 2 inches in 24 hours, and requiring retention of the 761 , 862 cubic feet of runoff for the most _
intense use of the property.
As with all development, a more detailed drainage review will be conducted during the development
approval process .
Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most E
intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates
that the adopted levels of service would be maintained . The following table illustrates the additional
�faqypark demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus park +
acreage .
PARK INFORMATION
t as
LOS ( Acres per 1 , 000 Population) Project Demand ( Acres ) Surplus Park Acreage
4 . 0 2 . 064 1 , 164
1 ,<
Concurrency Summary
Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency-mandated facilities ,
including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to
accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district .
#£ Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request.
1 :
I If If
vl
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
� ^ f
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan .
Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
P
Land Use Map , which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and
industrial land uses and their densities . Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes
throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County .
r
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
community ' s development . As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions . While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests . Of particular
applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies .
Future Land IJge Fl m nt Objective 1
Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern .
By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with the site ' s land use
designation, the request facilitates the creation of a more compact and efficient land use pattern
within the urban service area, while maintaining the county ' s overall low density character. For
these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1 .
January 23 , 2001If
49
" If 11
� I 0 rG 335
icx x
mature Land T Ise Flement Policies 1 1 and 1 . 14
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 14 states that the M - 1 , Medium-Density Residential- 1 , land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 unitsiacre . In addition, Future Land
Use Element Policy 1 . 13 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service
�- area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as M - 1 on the county ' s future land
use plan map and is located within the county ' s urban service area and the proposed zoning district t
would allow residential uses no greater than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M- 1 designation, the
proposed request is consistent with Policies 1 . 13 and 1 . 14 .
t
Future T and Use Element Policy 2 .2
Future Land Use Element Policv 2 . 2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into
the urban service area through zoning and LDRs . Since the proposed rezoning would allow and
encourage more development on the subject property and the subject property is within the urban
service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2 . 2 .
Future Land Use Element Objective
Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of
trips on county roads .
The site is located near several of the county ' s largest employment centers , including the Indian
River Mall and the Prime Outlet Mall . Many people who work in those employment centers live
in moderately-priced, low to medium density housing. The RM- 8 zoning district is intended for such
uses. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in those
areas to live near their jobs, thus reducing the length of their trips to and from work . For this reason,
the request facilitates the achievement of Future Land Use Element Objective 4 .
As part of its consistency analysis , staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and
no conflicts . Therefore , the request is consistent with the
policies in the plan and found
comprehensive plan .
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area k
Staff' s position is that multiple-family residential development is appropriate for the site and that
such development would be compatible with surrounding land uses . Those land uses include two
major roads, a large mobile home park (Village Green) , three large multiple- family developments =
hood
( Indian River Estates, Lake-in-the-Woods, and Vista Plantation ) , a large Traditional Neighbor ,
Design development (Pointe West ) , and the Seald Sweet office building . That existing land use
pattern demonstrates that this area of the county is appropriate for larger and more intense
4
developments , such as multiple- family projects .
In addition to the above referenced existing land uses, there are several A- 1 zoned tracts in the area
of the subject propem . In this area of the county , however, the A - 1 zoning district is essentially a x
"holding" zone until the market and/or other factors indicate the land is ready to be developed .
4
Although A - 1 zoned land exists to the northeast, south and west of the site, the county anticipates
that that land will eventually be rezoned and converted to multiple- family residential uses . For those
reasons , multiple - family development on the subject property would be compatible with surrounding
areas .
F
January 23 , 2001
50
rb C
r
arm
� 55
r s W
w` si x
ma.c•� . . ... ,., _ ., ;a w. L: k ,. sue' ; ,r'kl�'.-.'3k''!t�+.. . -�. f< '�„4$c #'„
mature Land T Ise Flement Policies 1 1 and 1 . 14
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 . 14 states that the M - 1 , Medium-Density Residential- 1 , land use
designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 unitsiacre . In addition, Future Land
Use Element Policy 1 . 13 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service
�- area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as M - 1 on the county ' s future land
use plan map and is located within the county ' s urban service area and the proposed zoning district t
would allow residential uses no greater than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M- 1 designation, the
proposed request is consistent with Policies 1 . 13 and 1 . 14 .
t
Future T and Use Element Policy 2 .2
Future Land Use Element Policv 2 . 2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into
the urban service area through zoning and LDRs . Since the proposed rezoning would allow and
encourage more development on the subject property and the subject property is within the urban
service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2 . 2 .
Future Land Use Element Objective
Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of
trips on county roads .
The site is located near several of the county ' s largest employment centers , including the Indian
River Mall and the Prime Outlet Mall . Many people who work in those employment centers live
in moderately-priced, low to medium density housing. The RM- 8 zoning district is intended for such
uses. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in those
areas to live near their jobs, thus reducing the length of their trips to and from work . For this reason,
the request facilitates the achievement of Future Land Use Element Objective 4 .
As part of its consistency analysis , staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and
no conflicts . Therefore , the request is consistent with the
policies in the plan and found
comprehensive plan .
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area k
Staff' s position is that multiple-family residential development is appropriate for the site and that
such development would be compatible with surrounding land uses . Those land uses include two
major roads, a large mobile home park (Village Green) , three large multiple- family developments =
hood
( Indian River Estates, Lake-in-the-Woods, and Vista Plantation ) , a large Traditional Neighbor ,
Design development (Pointe West ) , and the Seald Sweet office building . That existing land use
pattern demonstrates that this area of the county is appropriate for larger and more intense
4
developments , such as multiple- family projects .
In addition to the above referenced existing land uses, there are several A- 1 zoned tracts in the area
of the subject propem . In this area of the county , however, the A - 1 zoning district is essentially a x
"holding" zone until the market and/or other factors indicate the land is ready to be developed .
4
Although A - 1 zoned land exists to the northeast, south and west of the site, the county anticipates
that that land will eventually be rezoned and converted to multiple- family residential uses . For those
reasons , multiple - family development on the subject property would be compatible with surrounding
areas .
F
January 23 , 2001
50
rb C
r
arm
� 55
r s W
w` si x
ma.c•� . . ... ,., _ ., ;a w. L: k ,. sue' ; ,r'kl�'.-.'3k''!t�+.. . -�. f< '�„4$c #'„
IN
Yi l 1
Hr'"}. „ s.
° ' M
Nl
el
Ile
le
eAl
Although multiple- family development on the subject property would be compatible with the 1
inactive citrus grove on the tl4 acre outparcel , leaving the outparcel zoned A - 1 essentially creates
a " spot " of A - 1 zoned land surrounded by other zoning districts . While that outparcel currently
consists of an inactive citrus grove, an active grove could be re- established on the outparcel under
the existing A- 1 zoning district . Additionally, county regulations allow agricultural uses that have
not been replaced by another use to continue on a site even after that site has been given a non-
Ile
agricultural zoning district . In the case of the outparcel, the grove ( albeit inactive) still exists . For 1
�>
those reasons, an active grove could be re- established on the outparcel even if the outparcel were
rezoned to another zoning district . In other words , the "spot " zone could be eliminated without
ell
prohibiting the re-establishment of an active citrus grove on the outparcel .
Nevertheless, the property owner has indicated that he does not desire to rezone the outparcel at this
time. For that reason, the outparcel is not part of the subject rezoning request and the outparcel will
retain the A- I zoning classification.
ef
Another factor that indicates that this area of the county is a good location for multiple-family
Ile I
development is its close proximity to the SR 60 commercial/industrial nodes . Because it has easy
access to the SR 60 nodes, the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for
multiple-family housing generated by those employment centers . In effect, the proposed rezoning ell
ell
would increase the opportunity for people to live near their place of employment.
Additionally, the subject property is located within the boundaries of the SR 60 Corridor Plan Area.
Therefore, multiple- family residential development on the site must meet special landscaping ,
lee
architecturaleIrl 11
All , roof design, signage , color, and other standards .
eed
For these reasons, staff' s position is that the requested zoning district would be compatible with
adjacent residential development .
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
I Ile
Being a citrus grove, the site has been altered. Since the subject property contains no "
environmentally important land, such as wetlands or sensitive uplands, development of the site is
anticipated to have little or no impact on environmental quality . For this reason , no significant
adverse impacts on important environmental resources are anticipated .
CONCLUSION
Ile, l
feel
Based on the analysis , staff has determined that the proposed rezoning is compatible with
surrounding areas, consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will have
no negative impacts on environmental quality , and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most
Ile
importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for medium -density multiple-
family residential uses . For these reasons, staff supports the request .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A- 1 to RM- 8 by adopting
the attached ordinance .
Ile
I ell "
t -
January 23 , 2001
Ile
Ile
51 Z ell
BK I PG 8 3 7
r _
k 3
177777, „�': '�.&x h'
<
�. .« .�' r . aT"" t ���` n ='L»�{ ,a!""."
�� �
,. . o- " ., . p .. rd �:: ' . .' y, n. t . . :.. - .eswrY s wr. +,°' ,,� � ,. n 'L�" . yT `.!..:.
^'' .. ... . � ` Ji � r ,"3, . � �, °r,•F. r s +'�r; :;
�° t� , "+. 3 .� , ,.d � a �. � . v . ='� S�y asp., . •..�sr`4'y>�t�x,r+� �', :��. �� � ., y,„- a.
. x�.. ;. . a ,p .. qtr
t^`ry . '� ';i r �` , :�. ., -s- .,± :SH'�`.«-r�� e�'t, P” "�° .b4r-'�a ' +'�;�. s �*+ F€%z=;-t , � ,L,<�s`a �"
�;�' kdt-�`• 3` ;*} Z,�„+,'3'k y ,.# .t a. . •� s ° " �`". tax', "- �`# ,+�
IN
Yi l 1
Hr'"}. „ s.
° ' M
Nl
el
Ile
le
eAl
Although multiple- family development on the subject property would be compatible with the 1
inactive citrus grove on the tl4 acre outparcel , leaving the outparcel zoned A - 1 essentially creates
a " spot " of A - 1 zoned land surrounded by other zoning districts . While that outparcel currently
consists of an inactive citrus grove, an active grove could be re- established on the outparcel under
the existing A- 1 zoning district . Additionally, county regulations allow agricultural uses that have
not been replaced by another use to continue on a site even after that site has been given a non-
Ile
agricultural zoning district . In the case of the outparcel, the grove ( albeit inactive) still exists . For 1
�>
those reasons, an active grove could be re- established on the outparcel even if the outparcel were
rezoned to another zoning district . In other words , the "spot " zone could be eliminated without
ell
prohibiting the re-establishment of an active citrus grove on the outparcel .
Nevertheless, the property owner has indicated that he does not desire to rezone the outparcel at this
time. For that reason, the outparcel is not part of the subject rezoning request and the outparcel will
retain the A- I zoning classification.
ef
Another factor that indicates that this area of the county is a good location for multiple-family
Ile I
development is its close proximity to the SR 60 commercial/industrial nodes . Because it has easy
access to the SR 60 nodes, the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for
multiple-family housing generated by those employment centers . In effect, the proposed rezoning ell
ell
would increase the opportunity for people to live near their place of employment.
Additionally, the subject property is located within the boundaries of the SR 60 Corridor Plan Area.
Therefore, multiple- family residential development on the site must meet special landscaping ,
lee
architecturaleIrl 11
All , roof design, signage , color, and other standards .
eed
For these reasons, staff' s position is that the requested zoning district would be compatible with
adjacent residential development .
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
I Ile
Being a citrus grove, the site has been altered. Since the subject property contains no "
environmentally important land, such as wetlands or sensitive uplands, development of the site is
anticipated to have little or no impact on environmental quality . For this reason , no significant
adverse impacts on important environmental resources are anticipated .
CONCLUSION
Ile, l
feel
Based on the analysis , staff has determined that the proposed rezoning is compatible with
surrounding areas, consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will have
no negative impacts on environmental quality , and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most
Ile
importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for medium -density multiple-
family residential uses . For these reasons, staff supports the request .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A- 1 to RM- 8 by adopting
the attached ordinance .
Ile
I ell "
t -
January 23 , 2001
Ile
Ile
51 Z ell
BK I PG 8 3 7
r _
k 3
177777, „�': '�.&x h'
<
�. .« .�' r . aT"" t ���` n ='L»�{ ,a!""."
�� �
,. . o- " ., . p .. rd �:: ' . .' y, n. t . . :.. - .eswrY s wr. +,°' ,,� � ,. n 'L�" . yT `.!..:.
^'' .. ... . � ` Ji � r ,"3, . � �, °r,•F. r s +'�r; :;
�° t� , "+. 3 .� , ,.d � a �. � . v . ='� S�y asp., . •..�sr`4'y>�t�x,r+� �', :��. �� � ., y,„- a.
. x�.. ;. . a ,p .. qtr
t^`ry . '� ';i r �` , :�. ., -s- .,± :SH'�`.«-r�� e�'t, P” "�° .b4r-'�a ' +'�;�. s �*+ F€%z=;-t , � ,L,<�s`a �"
�;�' kdt-�`• 3` ;*} Z,�„+,'3'k y ,.# .t a. . •� s ° " �`". tax', "- �`# ,+�
t , �.' `i; y... .� ._ , �; x,= rx rb . .. .a,,.r, z- r ,.._ y * ;,r � � ".. .r-„ * �,
a,.. �' ..; ', ✓ = :r :_ ., .. ,. ,-a.
�.., ,. ,. s�%= •'at. ��_� �5"��"' ;::.,.,:+kd "?ia=?'" 5y y,,�� a��;�'i'�v3 =u �,..., ... � y�{$�` ,, "v
.;# , v�c,�� . »n. >g r
xk� . • - , - N� , a 't �+�4 ,t T.rr.�? 2§ Yl v Y. �'.� ��F�`«"iXt �F S "" �S�A . £.`r a'f �
Y. 45� �`„, 15
+. -
Y
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Summary Page
2 . Rezoning Application
3 . Unapproved Minutes of the January 11 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4 . Rezoning Ordinance
Director Keating responded to concerns of the Commissioners regarding the 4 - 3
Planning and Zoning Commission ' s vote ; the 14 - acre out- parcel being developed as
commercial (would have to be a County- initiated rezoning request) ; and limiting rezoning
on the property to RM - 6 rather than RM- 8 .
There was a brief discussion concerning the appropriateness of RM- 6 or RM- 8
zoning on SR 60 and the necessity and demand for multi - family housing , whether it is
affordable housing or not ,
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
in this matter .
David Knight, Knight & McGuire & Associates , Inc . , appeared representing the
applicant . He pointed out that the land use plan supports RM - 8 in this area and that there
is a need for multi - family housing in the community . He stressed that RM- 8 is not high
density with respect to most multi - family projects . He stated that the adjacent RS - 6
property was built in the 1960 ' s when water and sewer connections were not available
and cautioned that non - approval of RM- 8 will encourage expansion of the urban service
area for future multi - family needs . He asked the Board to consider these points and
encouraged the Board to follow staff' s recommendation for RM- 8 zoning .
John Servos . 1745 7151 Court , pointed out that there is only a short frontage of this
proposed development on SR 60 . He thought RM- 8 zoning was a little bit too much for ;
the area because these "high- rises " will be in the "backyards " of the homes (zoned RS - 6 )
January 23 , 2001
52
BK 1 65 Pri 333
4;,,
k . ],
,.. , x ,Fs - .
;3" - � .. ��^
n
,`'� .
sr.. -. ,e ... .. ;u' .",fi .: 3 .. , �:{z• , � � . . . ,x. .`�y. , ti � m. i ,T�u. -,a.- � ,�, , . . �
��Pt .f, y^v�-0���� >, a aix� k SS� .""', ,a �" .::y
. ., sa a '-�=s :.. � ,Ty�'s•�' . ;,. �3;v���' m H...2 a ;P � eL., `5� , ..: %. q�� rs,A�" e _ .,
,,. .rmm � ..;c -.�, .uC -''& r r .:9R�.� �. . f. :. a, r ,.'�: , '�`s .? .
wrz; � ' .w . ,� . . : - .>, , „t � .,�, , ,, . :,. • ' e. . , „ � .:s, 1�"�, . , ... - *n- . �-,:.
. , � `:�,t ��. +� . �' , Z^"k. '% 4 .0 ._. � i.�. " - �.�.. .. � .+ ,. .xr$,: .. .,, - du• .: ' „w«;�r,.p:. .
x a, r ^� ' , {j 'b". vF' i x �s "Kt z ,. Jn° n: -e;z "S ,..' a ,; , S"m"`, ^.; ` '.b" }+i
Y 2 `2' ' .* F 5+rw, , w =;": 'aa.,,,:✓ "' 34 " > q
'�° xw�'^-§ z -. ,.: � ' :,. �..: "{-,. fe; :._ . .. ��''�',, °k+'. 'Jnr ,.*.'axk'�t�km�v,.'r" ���#a?�5��':�»t '�,`Y:.�i
. ��,.. a._^. z„nit=�,�..,`rk� ,.2� .:'se•u .3rm',E;'.51 ;�r�SA�r�',+•t ,tr"_ 's%n`�"'°c��''��¢ai'S �P�:r , ,r iii ,�d+w,. ��'' $"`.>.w-��u'���.'+.-sah,.r'�
tt xs. ,
t , �.' `i; y... .� ._ , �; x,= rx rb . .. .a,,.r, z- r ,.._ y * ;,r � � ".. .r-„ * �,
a,.. �' ..; ', ✓ = :r :_ ., .. ,. ,-a.
�.., ,. ,. s�%= •'at. ��_� �5"��"' ;::.,.,:+kd "?ia=?'" 5y y,,�� a��;�'i'�v3 =u �,..., ... � y�{$�` ,, "v
.;# , v�c,�� . »n. >g r
xk� . • - , - N� , a 't �+�4 ,t T.rr.�? 2§ Yl v Y. �'.� ��F�`«"iXt �F S "" �S�A . £.`r a'f �
Y. 45� �`„, 15
+. -
Y
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Summary Page
2 . Rezoning Application
3 . Unapproved Minutes of the January 11 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4 . Rezoning Ordinance
Director Keating responded to concerns of the Commissioners regarding the 4 - 3
Planning and Zoning Commission ' s vote ; the 14 - acre out- parcel being developed as
commercial (would have to be a County- initiated rezoning request) ; and limiting rezoning
on the property to RM - 6 rather than RM- 8 .
There was a brief discussion concerning the appropriateness of RM- 6 or RM- 8
zoning on SR 60 and the necessity and demand for multi - family housing , whether it is
affordable housing or not ,
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
in this matter .
David Knight, Knight & McGuire & Associates , Inc . , appeared representing the
applicant . He pointed out that the land use plan supports RM - 8 in this area and that there
is a need for multi - family housing in the community . He stressed that RM- 8 is not high
density with respect to most multi - family projects . He stated that the adjacent RS - 6
property was built in the 1960 ' s when water and sewer connections were not available
and cautioned that non - approval of RM- 8 will encourage expansion of the urban service
area for future multi - family needs . He asked the Board to consider these points and
encouraged the Board to follow staff' s recommendation for RM- 8 zoning .
John Servos . 1745 7151 Court , pointed out that there is only a short frontage of this
proposed development on SR 60 . He thought RM- 8 zoning was a little bit too much for ;
the area because these "high- rises " will be in the "backyards " of the homes (zoned RS - 6 )
January 23 , 2001
52
BK 1 65 Pri 333
4;,,
k . ],
,.. , x ,Fs - .
;3" - � .. ��^
n
,`'� .
sr.. -. ,e ... .. ;u' .",fi .: 3 .. , �:{z• , � � . . . ,x. .`�y. , ti � m. i ,T�u. -,a.- � ,�, , . . �
��Pt .f, y^v�-0���� >, a aix� k SS� .""', ,a �" .::y
. ., sa a '-�=s :.. � ,Ty�'s•�' . ;,. �3;v���' m H...2 a ;P � eL., `5� , ..: %. q�� rs,A�" e _ .,
,,. .rmm � ..;c -.�, .uC -''& r r .:9R�.� �. . f. :. a, r ,.'�: , '�`s .? .
wrz; � ' .w . ,� . . : - .>, , „t � .,�, , ,, . :,. • ' e. . , „ � .:s, 1�"�, . , ... - *n- . �-,:.
. , � `:�,t ��. +� . �' , Z^"k. '% 4 .0 ._. � i.�. " - �.�.. .. � .+ ,. .xr$,: .. .,, - du• .: ' „w«;�r,.p:. .
x a, r ^� ' , {j 'b". vF' i x �s "Kt z ,. Jn° n: -e;z "S ,..' a ,; , S"m"`, ^.; ` '.b" }+i
Y 2 `2' ' .* F 5+rw, , w =;": 'aa.,,,:✓ "' 34 " > q
'�° xw�'^-§ z -. ,.: � ' :,. �..: "{-,. fe; :._ . .. ��''�',, °k+'. 'Jnr ,.*.'axk'�t�km�v,.'r" ���#a?�5��':�»t '�,`Y:.�i
. ��,.. a._^. z„nit=�,�..,`rk� ,.2� .:'se•u .3rm',E;'.51 ;�r�SA�r�',+•t ,tr"_ 's%n`�"'°c��''��¢ai'S �P�:r , ,r iii ,�d+w,. ��'' $"`.>.w-��u'���.'+.-sah,.r'�
tt xs. ,
x . . .. . t ... ,, .� xL G • ^x.. .v x, w �'+,. .3 : ..f.- :,. : .�.;- }t :�`; bef
', •;tig .M't'{ .. ' .s };d �:." . e ' .,='�«J5 ' >� ,.: a �' .3?'" xxs r =...
er wwy±'• 3; x . =c. ,: , .. -. +�:.� 4
+.. "4 _ „�. • , , . ,. :. . .. ,. . . . .�.n, r- � .s ...,fi «.,. a .a. � � 7= .�^., ., {.:�
"'� e f ., �. �' a �.h .,3:,+ �fi• 'f:: 9+- t .�<:. ,,,.{y: �t '� , u•„ ' t '
, "�,. �#'.n. . 4 r ,;, .� sb t. s>�r .:. e 'a+ . x .d. Ae `st , ra .z • "ti t«,
""1'v ...a..+ ;h xs. ro e€ ..>•;
.. . .,.. .. .., ,. . . . .- ,. -.•�:.y ,;.,` . g ,�.. , .,>fx .<. ,a. . .., ;. ,. ::h 6.. .. . , ,�...
�. •r.r. z'z^ > , .:_-„ '.x#` ,."ro. ' x.'"s ., .,y ='.r� Sv. .� " :._ ` ytYr &.. >;N, ,�+
., -€
. . •.cn. { � . • ' � :W .,.. t � 4'- . , t e•^r..:, zl'."��x, ..u4y gk� .. a . wa.�,. . :sr ce.- e .
�,�;.. 1 i3 - .i' . . } r-s ' . l, .....r .z.�:�� �k �..§ ,. ., .� ; i2
If
which were also built in the 1960 ' s . He predicted approval would also add to the
re
increase in traffic on SR 60 .
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing .
It
Commissioner Macht believed the continuity and the integrity of the neighborhood
was an overriding factor that would set aside any considerations of maximum density just
ell
tI
because it is allowed . He favored either RM- 6 or RS - 6 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY w .
Commissioner Stanbridge , the Board adopted 4 - 1
( Commissioner Tippin opposed) Ordinance No . 2001 - 002
amending the zoning Ordinance and the accompanying zoning
map for ± 32 . 36 acres located near the southeast corner of SR
60 and 74 " Avenue , from A - 1 , agricultural district ( up to 1
unit/ 5 acres ), to RM - 6 , multiple - family residential district (up
to 6 units/acre ) .
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 002
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±32 . 36 ACRES LOCATED
NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SR 60 AND 74T" AVENUE, FROM A- 1 ,
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES ) , TO RM-6, MULTIPLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) ; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. .,
WHEREAS , the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters , has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
,
If
January 23 , 2001
53
It
u . -^v*y-
. . ,t vi # d,.
htt ,.. .r .
S" r�..+ . s. v ,.,-..- ,'f 'l . ..:,..v v bt: ,. . . , ,.fia. ._, a•�. --.,, �,� ...° y,n a d.
`t'. ., Y' S� � 5. a iF' 9`C �'=t ., ro
'£ , ?
sk'
.., ;v'.w�,
�'F .
.'+€'n :� ,.. .• $5'*. § . ` z- ,. .a : `Y, a ' ., , `* s , ,,,y, � 3 -Am -ti as s. -"
-aa c .S.P N A" .= s x:esfi €, x� - r 'cS1` ` . . a €.• £
,.., �,} � .. . . . r .,.. .< •., .zss .,., ,« r , ..mx � .;f 4 ,,.: 'n , z , -x":,.: �.r?w
"�"'' ', ,: ;' €,ti . .., '. tc " :'�: .� -; - ?,r s - �. , .e ;x #,:
x .,. . -e-.v - . ., . . i3rrr . . .' - :, + . r.+f'., , s+• , x. .
,:x,� . , •, . . ., . , .. ,. �. ..
.ffi,
S�' � „x�'!;,+'�'�f sx4 -. �*� ±`k. ,s.; rG lt '..,. . . , . -1^fs . 3` a ✓ , , x n,y�.s,-rt, . k �` o, e+�::
: a: � 8r3^. v . ., f,« ,..z - ,4{.... . 84kw� .x "a s.:.
'Srv�
. .. .. . . - . i . , ,. . � , ,... . . . xxux .ac�� ka v.,u . {y, xx�,:. .,.T. arr r`. x � so-.,C' hr�
o-.:. sr Tr 5:- �. ,n' v `^ ..' "ta , <a:.,. '� &� ,<•.'»em .�,a'�t �k�;. :wb. � � ,d .'' 3. , c � c 'k4 ,> :. £ ,'� *� ..
+» .5�
, , :, u.' , , a . .� ... : . ' •.;- . rt. �"' S ;tiv ,. 1t• Yx-x :.. . �^ � .w r € }� w+ ;.o
ax '�_., -.:t r 3.•, "vv' -,,. -. .n i z, F .,. . ,+5�: ' .1 M^'�.ny",fi t �,,o b�;ry� ,y, �, :'Y. a x s.
let,
.. _ ..«,
x . . .. . t ... ,, .� xL G • ^x.. .v x, w �'+,. .3 : ..f.- :,. : .�.;- }t :�`; bef
', •;tig .M't'{ .. ' .s };d �:." . e ' .,='�«J5 ' >� ,.: a �' .3?'" xxs r =...
er wwy±'• 3; x . =c. ,: , .. -. +�:.� 4
+.. "4 _ „�. • , , . ,. :. . .. ,. . . . .�.n, r- � .s ...,fi «.,. a .a. � � 7= .�^., ., {.:�
"'� e f ., �. �' a �.h .,3:,+ �fi• 'f:: 9+- t .�<:. ,,,.{y: �t '� , u•„ ' t '
, "�,. �#'.n. . 4 r ,;, .� sb t. s>�r .:. e 'a+ . x .d. Ae `st , ra .z • "ti t«,
""1'v ...a..+ ;h xs. ro e€ ..>•;
.. . .,.. .. .., ,. . . . .- ,. -.•�:.y ,;.,` . g ,�.. , .,>fx .<. ,a. . .., ;. ,. ::h 6.. .. . , ,�...
�. •r.r. z'z^ > , .:_-„ '.x#` ,."ro. ' x.'"s ., .,y ='.r� Sv. .� " :._ ` ytYr &.. >;N, ,�+
., -€
. . •.cn. { � . • ' � :W .,.. t � 4'- . , t e•^r..:, zl'."��x, ..u4y gk� .. a . wa.�,. . :sr ce.- e .
�,�;.. 1 i3 - .i' . . } r-s ' . l, .....r .z.�:�� �k �..§ ,. ., .� ; i2
If
which were also built in the 1960 ' s . He predicted approval would also add to the
re
increase in traffic on SR 60 .
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing .
It
Commissioner Macht believed the continuity and the integrity of the neighborhood
was an overriding factor that would set aside any considerations of maximum density just
ell
tI
because it is allowed . He favored either RM- 6 or RS - 6 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY w .
Commissioner Stanbridge , the Board adopted 4 - 1
( Commissioner Tippin opposed) Ordinance No . 2001 - 002
amending the zoning Ordinance and the accompanying zoning
map for ± 32 . 36 acres located near the southeast corner of SR
60 and 74 " Avenue , from A - 1 , agricultural district ( up to 1
unit/ 5 acres ), to RM - 6 , multiple - family residential district (up
to 6 units/acre ) .
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 002
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR ±32 . 36 ACRES LOCATED
NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SR 60 AND 74T" AVENUE, FROM A- 1 ,
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES ) , TO RM-6, MULTIPLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) ; AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. .,
WHEREAS , the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters , has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
,
If
January 23 , 2001
53
It
u . -^v*y-
. . ,t vi # d,.
htt ,.. .r .
S" r�..+ . s. v ,.,-..- ,'f 'l . ..:,..v v bt: ,. . . , ,.fia. ._, a•�. --.,, �,� ...° y,n a d.
`t'. ., Y' S� � 5. a iF' 9`C �'=t ., ro
'£ , ?
sk'
.., ;v'.w�,
�'F .
.'+€'n :� ,.. .• $5'*. § . ` z- ,. .a : `Y, a ' ., , `* s , ,,,y, � 3 -Am -ti as s. -"
-aa c .S.P N A" .= s x:esfi €, x� - r 'cS1` ` . . a €.• £
,.., �,} � .. . . . r .,.. .< •., .zss .,., ,« r , ..mx � .;f 4 ,,.: 'n , z , -x":,.: �.r?w
"�"'' ', ,: ;' €,ti . .., '. tc " :'�: .� -; - ?,r s - �. , .e ;x #,:
x .,. . -e-.v - . ., . . i3rrr . . .' - :, + . r.+f'., , s+• , x. .
,:x,� . , •, . . ., . , .. ,. �. ..
.ffi,
S�' � „x�'!;,+'�'�f sx4 -. �*� ±`k. ,s.; rG lt '..,. . . , . -1^fs . 3` a ✓ , , x n,y�.s,-rt, . k �` o, e+�::
: a: � 8r3^. v . ., f,« ,..z - ,4{.... . 84kw� .x "a s.:.
'Srv�
. .. .. . . - . i . , ,. . � , ,... . . . xxux .ac�� ka v.,u . {y, xx�,:. .,.T. arr r`. x � so-.,C' hr�
o-.:. sr Tr 5:- �. ,n' v `^ ..' "ta , <a:.,. '� &� ,<•.'»em .�,a'�t �k�;. :wb. � � ,d .'' 3. , c � c 'k4 ,> :. £ ,'� *� ..
+» .5�
, , :, u.' , , a . .� ... : . ' •.;- . rt. �"' S ;tiv ,. 1t• Yx-x :.. . �^ � .w r € }� w+ ;.o
ax '�_., -.:t r 3.•, "vv' -,,. -. .n i z, F .,. . ,+5�: ' .1 M^'�.ny",fi t �,,o b�;ry� ,y, �, :'Y. a x s.
let,
.. _ ..«,
1';�+::.
...f „/� `d',°6R+. z .. . .dsa" , r . .. .s ,. . e .,tr;. . '� :5.: . nu .vr . . . . n ... £: �,. } , u,.: . .
,�, s=r: �xx , . f" 7. 'S; _„ �.• , ,+ VfiS �r „1...%.,. �.. . h v
�x? ,� �. a .. v a, , �,' �r �W-- e�4 �'- ���:•. p k � >x.�u T. "t "';. Sn J'n. .._ .. s � r �*, � ,
� .s4 .t >� tt. , � . i �, '� a: y;, .1 k- ''J „�`a°.m '� ��, 4;a,. <i�•- � . .w�" + .
���,�k � i - . � Y :,, . .. t '+ cf. r4 +�`„. ar y�` >5 y. n 7N "�y° L
°`,�Z•Y � ”
a1,.y �. ._ o- '� ac ' z._.. , . s _.3 r .: sva . v-. > $ ;:� .,^, . :�. . .�' . s . . .. . > ?F
• 1 �x W�•�,' mR} t
L Ilk
ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -002
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED , by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County , Florida, to-wit:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 33
SOUTH , RANGE 39 EAST, AS RECORDED IN THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS
SUBDIVISION PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25 , THEN , FROM THE POINT OF
COMMENCEMENT NORTH 0000'09 " EAST FOR 1 ,330 .90 FEET ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID SECTION THEN , NORTH 8939'21 " EAST FOR 100.00 FEET TO THE 47
POINT OF BEGINNING. THEN FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING NORTH 0000'09 "
EAST FOR 812 .48 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 488 .22 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF A 30 FOOT DRAINAGE CANAL THEN, NORTH 8945 '34 " EAST
H 0000'34 " WEST FOR 488 .22 FEET TO THE
FOR 1 ,257 . 15 FEET . THEN , NORT
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A 30 FOOT DRAINAGE CANAL THEN , NORTH
8945 ' 34 " EAST FOR 300 .00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE EXTENSION OF LITTLE
PORTION SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5 , PAGE 90 TION, SOUTH
0000' 34 " EAST FOR 1 ,297 . 89 FEET, THEN SOUTH 8939'21 " WEST FOR 1 ,557 . 33
FEET TO THE PLACE AND POINT OF BEGINNING . CONTAINING 32 . 36 ACRES .
Be changed from A- 1 to RM -6.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations .
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State .
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County ,
Florida , on this 23rd day of January , 2001 . t
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the 10d' day of January , 2001 , for a
public hearing to be held on the 23`d day of January , 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption
by Commissioner Macht seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and
G .
adopted by the following vote :
January 23 , 2001
54 77A.
t'=d,n,.e:wai.f:;..-.:.n,u=.§3.i.< .!��Aa"!S�.i,.,,x�• 3f.r..,r,„v,:w:2',.L x. d tP S:,fsav '. �{
.Gx. .� 'td4i+u ,
c
f+kaFa,v
�.
r
, v. �: __ . . - ,. , ... < ,., . ..e:4 �-x i' .,,.- a` :�7, .'°:: .i s , %'x +. c , . .s-... �r3"' ? r, s
3.�,u,� a �yw; , s,k' r'L :: xZ �+` �-` .� y '� x"� �d n" , x rt ,• �°.bba '` `xi,
_ . ?. j . t . � . . .7e' .... ,m, . ,F�9 :N'M x .. ,,. .. �. ..:Vii' ; ,. ., ✓ , ' fin. S .>
a .a G' t.�±- � rm,.,, 3` :,_: ^5 € ''r - `*� . S' v , �' , �v.'
af:.. . , . �.! � v . -- : . � ,. k. .« t , •..., , .) ., '3�..�. ,+ �^...„.��' .4. ,•31 f .. .. S. , ,. x..v w
. ; ..,,,. '� .,x: �. . rsk S ,. , `�V e � t "s?`� x S k"�..'�- ti �*�'..�",,F v i;e.« a R sr%es.
„ r ::;•.F.v . . . .. ... . ,n .- ., g. :�., >o,?`:,. r`5,.. . x ".�., , o ;; 'r.?, `� x -d V,ih�
, . ., s 1 -s's- a.,n .� .x a, ".%�', . 3?'„. :,',2e<�„ hsk ,fid- . .eru 'a" '£ b5.'�";..a � 'S
i��- r� „x . .. r. .r zkbnraT3a ��v£.c..» z_• ���-'-5h.§ .. .a. _ a:xx . ;
1';�+::.
...f „/� `d',°6R+. z .. . .dsa" , r . .. .s ,. . e .,tr;. . '� :5.: . nu .vr . . . . n ... £: �,. } , u,.: . .
,�, s=r: �xx , . f" 7. 'S; _„ �.• , ,+ VfiS �r „1...%.,. �.. . h v
�x? ,� �. a .. v a, , �,' �r �W-- e�4 �'- ���:•. p k � >x.�u T. "t "';. Sn J'n. .._ .. s � r �*, � ,
� .s4 .t >� tt. , � . i �, '� a: y;, .1 k- ''J „�`a°.m '� ��, 4;a,. <i�•- � . .w�" + .
���,�k � i - . � Y :,, . .. t '+ cf. r4 +�`„. ar y�` >5 y. n 7N "�y° L
°`,�Z•Y � ”
a1,.y �. ._ o- '� ac ' z._.. , . s _.3 r .: sva . v-. > $ ;:� .,^, . :�. . .�' . s . . .. . > ?F
• 1 �x W�•�,' mR} t
L Ilk
ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -002
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED , by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County , Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County , Florida, to-wit:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 33
SOUTH , RANGE 39 EAST, AS RECORDED IN THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS
SUBDIVISION PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25 , THEN , FROM THE POINT OF
COMMENCEMENT NORTH 0000'09 " EAST FOR 1 ,330 .90 FEET ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID SECTION THEN , NORTH 8939'21 " EAST FOR 100.00 FEET TO THE 47
POINT OF BEGINNING. THEN FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING NORTH 0000'09 "
EAST FOR 812 .48 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 488 .22 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF A 30 FOOT DRAINAGE CANAL THEN, NORTH 8945 '34 " EAST
H 0000'34 " WEST FOR 488 .22 FEET TO THE
FOR 1 ,257 . 15 FEET . THEN , NORT
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A 30 FOOT DRAINAGE CANAL THEN , NORTH
8945 ' 34 " EAST FOR 300 .00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE EXTENSION OF LITTLE
PORTION SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5 , PAGE 90 TION, SOUTH
0000' 34 " EAST FOR 1 ,297 . 89 FEET, THEN SOUTH 8939'21 " WEST FOR 1 ,557 . 33
FEET TO THE PLACE AND POINT OF BEGINNING . CONTAINING 32 . 36 ACRES .
Be changed from A- 1 to RM -6.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations .
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State .
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County ,
Florida , on this 23rd day of January , 2001 . t
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the 10d' day of January , 2001 , for a
public hearing to be held on the 23`d day of January , 2001 , at which time it was moved for adoption
by Commissioner Macht seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and
G .
adopted by the following vote :
January 23 , 2001
54 77A.
t'=d,n,.e:wai.f:;..-.:.n,u=.§3.i.< .!��Aa"!S�.i,.,,x�• 3f.r..,r,„v,:w:2',.L x. d tP S:,fsav '. �{
.Gx. .� 'td4i+u ,
c
f+kaFa,v
�.
r
, v. �: __ . . - ,. , ... < ,., . ..e:4 �-x i' .,,.- a` :�7, .'°:: .i s , %'x +. c , . .s-... �r3"' ? r, s
3.�,u,� a �yw; , s,k' r'L :: xZ �+` �-` .� y '� x"� �d n" , x rt ,• �°.bba '` `xi,
_ . ?. j . t . � . . .7e' .... ,m, . ,F�9 :N'M x .. ,,. .. �. ..:Vii' ; ,. ., ✓ , ' fin. S .>
a .a G' t.�±- � rm,.,, 3` :,_: ^5 € ''r - `*� . S' v , �' , �v.'
af:.. . , . �.! � v . -- : . � ,. k. .« t , •..., , .) ., '3�..�. ,+ �^...„.��' .4. ,•31 f .. .. S. , ,. x..v w
. ; ..,,,. '� .,x: �. . rsk S ,. , `�V e � t "s?`� x S k"�..'�- ti �*�'..�",,F v i;e.« a R sr%es.
„ r ::;•.F.v . . . .. ... . ,n .- ., g. :�., >o,?`:,. r`5,.. . x ".�., , o ;; 'r.?, `� x -d V,ih�
, . ., s 1 -s's- a.,n .� .x a, ".%�', . 3?'„. :,',2e<�„ hsk ,fid- . .eru 'a" '£ b5.'�";..a � 'S
i��- r� „x . .. r. .r zkbnraT3a ��v£.c..» z_• ���-'-5h.§ .. .a. _ a:xx . ;
F ✓ra ', >. r, in. ' :, ,. ,. ^� .. � a j„,. - .: x .} -:r.'x� �. :- . : �:: rs -::: » « ; : g v„
# , a S+ : .F: C 4t, ,v : ! + .lj <; r
.� .. .�. . „. � . r i �,. . ,„ .. .� « , ,.,�. A ?` 'tom:. -. . .. ,.>w, a s. 7 ..
sx Asa r 1 v � � - :- "S,�.t R ",• � a , -
e ,. .
a�> 4... ,.?. . t—: .is d .� � .. ,nr� - - ”' Y"�':. : .ln �.. y .,Y' ?'.,.*r`. . .., , L r,..,,., .
,. x _ =x.. . -•fr �, fin...-.r r,:.x 3w . . ... u4 i - _,., s LB h .L ...� i Y ,.may. A Y¢x
.,n » . , < ss;3 N .. ,�. R. . .t..:... t �r .. .. . . ..J' ,», "kn 'fsi '7 :,+, �'+ .,..s: ,z x :d,F
'% a . - . „r,.. .u. , "t+' '� n,,.,. rz '^•,y, ;, � it .:. .a'�' ,¢ "''@. x a � :s # -£„
„�. „ t...«?tx s � Y xkz a.'a31i5a ➢5 C. x ' .n a ��-»« kz ex �
..,,
N
r
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 002
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn _ Ave
Vice-Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Nay
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: �-,/�
Caroline D. Ginn, Cha man
ATTEST B l�
Jeffrey K. Barton, I rk
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date :
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G . Collins II , Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
obert M . Keating , AICP
Community Development Direct r
Indw Rao Ca Approved Date
cd\u\v\j\rz\richman\rzon ord. wpd Admin.
Legal r
Budget U
Dept. i
Risk Mgr.
January 23 , 2001
55
B of0PG841
,. ,,.,^><.v � x,:s> - ,,. - ,. y .',°a ,'a ,. - .� �,s, •* - hrr��::� �Q'.. .� vti 's'.v ,x„ ,x, ,s . > ..a, s
s ,. -: , , f ''s`r' ,� '.: '� a .c maa �"-b 5at.,o;' eN' . 4 ,- y; %" S x, a .i:w..z .r'f .
a .. :.W, �._ rs••,e - � n .. a r. ,. . - ., ,4 t- „�.'`§. e }, ,»"•• ,c �, � Y°2.r .i �- x. i xy r
u#. 5 �eSse« "` G t z:k: > ..+,<, tt .-F ",,, i w.,.. ci 'x ^*. 6Y v < ..,. � M k 9
tx r
:. .. « . ,r ' .,a,. , "�_ t+ .Yz- . x - , . .w.x T .. .. .. �, #;`++'a 9 = , .. 'R �- .. ... » F . ,:rc
,ft.a„ Fz y�22 , tt. w '+a .;✓:f n.., a'
�ar#;'# teY,`-kRk,.r}. tY�
�
"
�: v ,3+dp.2 ,. }nw`7 ,� ..}, a � � 3 r u X' .. ct h ,r.. . . .. ..,- ha :._,�... ,t✓ . .r i�. wti,.
. ( ,. .,� iy , .�. 4},A s# ..`� S .,,. ,l}v . n+.sk.- .f t
F ✓ra ', >. r, in. ' :, ,. ,. ^� .. � a j„,. - .: x .} -:r.'x� �. :- . : �:: rs -::: » « ; : g v„
# , a S+ : .F: C 4t, ,v : ! + .lj <; r
.� .. .�. . „. � . r i �,. . ,„ .. .� « , ,.,�. A ?` 'tom:. -. . .. ,.>w, a s. 7 ..
sx Asa r 1 v � � - :- "S,�.t R ",• � a , -
e ,. .
a�> 4... ,.?. . t—: .is d .� � .. ,nr� - - ”' Y"�':. : .ln �.. y .,Y' ?'.,.*r`. . .., , L r,..,,., .
,. x _ =x.. . -•fr �, fin...-.r r,:.x 3w . . ... u4 i - _,., s LB h .L ...� i Y ,.may. A Y¢x
.,n » . , < ss;3 N .. ,�. R. . .t..:... t �r .. .. . . ..J' ,», "kn 'fsi '7 :,+, �'+ .,..s: ,z x :d,F
'% a . - . „r,.. .u. , "t+' '� n,,.,. rz '^•,y, ;, � it .:. .a'�' ,¢ "''@. x a � :s # -£„
„�. „ t...«?tx s � Y xkz a.'a31i5a ➢5 C. x ' .n a ��-»« kz ex �
..,,
N
r
ORDINANCE NO . 2001 - 002
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn _ Ave
Vice-Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Nay
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: �-,/�
Caroline D. Ginn, Cha man
ATTEST B l�
Jeffrey K. Barton, I rk
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date :
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G . Collins II , Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
obert M . Keating , AICP
Community Development Direct r
Indw Rao Ca Approved Date
cd\u\v\j\rz\richman\rzon ord. wpd Admin.
Legal r
Budget U
Dept. i
Risk Mgr.
January 23 , 2001
55
B of0PG841
,. ,,.,^><.v � x,:s> - ,,. - ,. y .',°a ,'a ,. - .� �,s, •* - hrr��::� �Q'.. .� vti 's'.v ,x„ ,x, ,s . > ..a, s
s ,. -: , , f ''s`r' ,� '.: '� a .c maa �"-b 5at.,o;' eN' . 4 ,- y; %" S x, a .i:w..z .r'f .
a .. :.W, �._ rs••,e - � n .. a r. ,. . - ., ,4 t- „�.'`§. e }, ,»"•• ,c �, � Y°2.r .i �- x. i xy r
u#. 5 �eSse« "` G t z:k: > ..+,<, tt .-F ",,, i w.,.. ci 'x ^*. 6Y v < ..,. � M k 9
tx r
:. .. « . ,r ' .,a,. , "�_ t+ .Yz- . x - , . .w.x T .. .. .. �, #;`++'a 9 = , .. 'R �- .. ... » F . ,:rc
,ft.a„ Fz y�22 , tt. w '+a .;✓:f n.., a'
�ar#;'# teY,`-kRk,.r}. tY�
�
"
�: v ,3+dp.2 ,. }nw`7 ,� ..}, a � � 3 r u X' .. ct h ,r.. . . .. ..,- ha :._,�... ,t✓ . .r i�. wti,.
. ( ,. .,� iy , .�. 4},A s# ..`� S .,,. ,l}v . n+.sk.- .f t
n
R ' mss . . ,, ,k. ,u ., —° G 3 . '^r e +, s,, :z a , r y; f ,x. - . „.ak'rh ,, w
:; t s r 4`. . :. 5 t *k ,` +.k ; n* + ,�v r n +:;: .l'• Fe...
...., s. . ` ' e•.,,.°5. . : -., "-i , . s ,. ,
�i r , 'S
.x, a�. . yx .k . ,, w - . , . s +�' . ,�9
h>. . - , ,.. .,: .. . . . . " aur...,.- Y.� f.. a - .,, ^ .0 4 ,, re. ,. .3a--, _., s u y. ,k:.. . .<k ...5
t &. .":3r»r` k m . :;pe.. ... ;�xc`z�.r•. . F .t"t°a +, -z a�
. . ,m.. �, r: � i. . ,:. �" �.'. �, :
�� *, :� .
u -.- �,}4..
d ` ,z5�3,- �.,x .•,•. k:a .;,., .., s.'o-'43�4Sx=•-.. K'f' �, ,. .,. ,« .. ,� s .,. ., , _„'. r
,x-7z:!
nrk �r
. w
9 . B . 1 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - PRESENTATION OF ALPI
(AGRICULTURAL LABOR PROGRAM INC ) SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 15 , 2000 :
TO : Margaret Gunter
FROM : Joyce Johnston-Carts
DATE : December 15 , 2000
SUBJECT: Item for Agenda - Public Discussion Items
Please list the following on the Agenda dated Tuesday, January 23 , 2001 - Public Discussion
Items :
ALPI (Agricultural Labor Program Inc) Representative , Angela Davis , will speak about ALP [
services offered to Indian River County , and waiting lists .
Pat Telfer, filling in for Angela Davis , advised she is the Contracts Manager for
Subsidized Childcare Services to ALPL She advised of the many services provided
through the Community Childcare Resource ( CCCR) and Referral Network . One of the
programs is the Florida Directory for Early Childhood Services , which serves families
with special needs children . Other programs include School Age Care Services ( SACC) ,
Caring for Kids ( CFK) , Infant/Toddler Services , T . E . A . C . H . , Inclusion Program Services ,
Bilingual Services , assistance with information for program and staff development . A
data base is maintained for the 19 childcare providers in the area . Currently on Indian
River County ' s waiting list there are 185 children for pre - kindergarten , 16 for CCCR, 177
for RCMA , 29 for Head Start , and 600 children for subsidized care for a total of 1 , 007 .
The waiting list and application process can be accessed by calling 1 - 800 - 948 - 9536 .
CCCR also reviews the CAPS ( Comprehensive Analysis Project System) to assist
providers in maintaining their license through the Department of Children and Families
(DCF ) . A data base for the " Where to Turn ” manual is also maintained and a quarterly
newsletter is published .
Chairman Ginn felt ALPI is doing a wonderful job and had every confidence after
January 23 , 2001
56 € .
K � 6 PG U042
f"i +
•" �ry„ t� �$ a is <d
F
r
#
r z.:,... .. . ._M . . .. .:,, .a
i r, ..,, a .._.., 7 r ,..I . . :�: rp ,
...::. c. +t z�t ax` x:. A. t. . + . ✓>`@ � sY »..,... .e SY ,.. . #"+ , ..+ e ,. . ...
Y s ,y.... _ r . . . ... x rc' � -: i '+ra:,
s.„ . . a # , s ' +
�'? •� :a. t �.r- € ” � 3 IY�a�ax:, tY , �. a. e,- k *ii rt c ,[ .s f �T: ! m n
? e .+±.,_ ry
amx s .,. kn-{« `..0 a sa•, r ':
s ,~ .+ '
,. �. . „, . v v's �`”- u . ,t= s' - �. •` � °. .v ,4`,g. tS ,t`Y ' " > ...[F" ', `kx
x . .,.. , M , . kf'J`
. sv; , . +,
1
r >�. 4't, €. , ., .� .� fr 'v�xds: s _ �.zsx^ .,` �. •s� . r..hi zJta, .�c'x, _ L.m stare T�. . x _ ,'k... ,-w . ..�. >
c �, _ .. ..,. _ � v, . , ^vx` ,x �. ., , . a , ...r•'as�. .:a== e ,3 , a„ -_. ,. . s_ ,...r=az , xas5�,^v,. ,..
s k _ __ + s„ .. h.u.- £ . e ,a , .,�:
n
R ' mss . . ,, ,k. ,u ., —° G 3 . '^r e +, s,, :z a , r y; f ,x. - . „.ak'rh ,, w
:; t s r 4`. . :. 5 t *k ,` +.k ; n* + ,�v r n +:;: .l'• Fe...
...., s. . ` ' e•.,,.°5. . : -., "-i , . s ,. ,
�i r , 'S
.x, a�. . yx .k . ,, w - . , . s +�' . ,�9
h>. . - , ,.. .,: .. . . . . " aur...,.- Y.� f.. a - .,, ^ .0 4 ,, re. ,. .3a--, _., s u y. ,k:.. . .<k ...5
t &. .":3r»r` k m . :;pe.. ... ;�xc`z�.r•. . F .t"t°a +, -z a�
. . ,m.. �, r: � i. . ,:. �" �.'. �, :
�� *, :� .
u -.- �,}4..
d ` ,z5�3,- �.,x .•,•. k:a .;,., .., s.'o-'43�4Sx=•-.. K'f' �, ,. .,. ,« .. ,� s .,. ., , _„'. r
,x-7z:!
nrk �r
. w
9 . B . 1 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - PRESENTATION OF ALPI
(AGRICULTURAL LABOR PROGRAM INC ) SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 15 , 2000 :
TO : Margaret Gunter
FROM : Joyce Johnston-Carts
DATE : December 15 , 2000
SUBJECT: Item for Agenda - Public Discussion Items
Please list the following on the Agenda dated Tuesday, January 23 , 2001 - Public Discussion
Items :
ALPI (Agricultural Labor Program Inc) Representative , Angela Davis , will speak about ALP [
services offered to Indian River County , and waiting lists .
Pat Telfer, filling in for Angela Davis , advised she is the Contracts Manager for
Subsidized Childcare Services to ALPL She advised of the many services provided
through the Community Childcare Resource ( CCCR) and Referral Network . One of the
programs is the Florida Directory for Early Childhood Services , which serves families
with special needs children . Other programs include School Age Care Services ( SACC) ,
Caring for Kids ( CFK) , Infant/Toddler Services , T . E . A . C . H . , Inclusion Program Services ,
Bilingual Services , assistance with information for program and staff development . A
data base is maintained for the 19 childcare providers in the area . Currently on Indian
River County ' s waiting list there are 185 children for pre - kindergarten , 16 for CCCR, 177
for RCMA , 29 for Head Start , and 600 children for subsidized care for a total of 1 , 007 .
The waiting list and application process can be accessed by calling 1 - 800 - 948 - 9536 .
CCCR also reviews the CAPS ( Comprehensive Analysis Project System) to assist
providers in maintaining their license through the Department of Children and Families
(DCF ) . A data base for the " Where to Turn ” manual is also maintained and a quarterly
newsletter is published .
Chairman Ginn felt ALPI is doing a wonderful job and had every confidence after
January 23 , 2001
56 € .
K � 6 PG U042
f"i +
•" �ry„ t� �$ a is <d
F
r
#
r z.:,... .. . ._M . . .. .:,, .a
i r, ..,, a .._.., 7 r ,..I . . :�: rp ,
...::. c. +t z�t ax` x:. A. t. . + . ✓>`@ � sY »..,... .e SY ,.. . #"+ , ..+ e ,. . ...
Y s ,y.... _ r . . . ... x rc' � -: i '+ra:,
s.„ . . a # , s ' +
�'? •� :a. t �.r- € ” � 3 IY�a�ax:, tY , �. a. e,- k *ii rt c ,[ .s f �T: ! m n
? e .+±.,_ ry
amx s .,. kn-{« `..0 a sa•, r ':
s ,~ .+ '
,. �. . „, . v v's �`”- u . ,t= s' - �. •` � °. .v ,4`,g. tS ,t`Y ' " > ...[F" ', `kx
x . .,.. , M , . kf'J`
. sv; , . +,
1
r >�. 4't, €. , ., .� .� fr 'v�xds: s _ �.zsx^ .,` �. •s� . r..hi zJta, .�c'x, _ L.m stare T�. . x _ ,'k... ,-w . ..�. >
c �, _ .. ..,. _ � v, . , ^vx` ,x �. ., , . a , ...r•'as�. .:a== e ,3 , a„ -_. ,. . s_ ,...r=az , xas5�,^v,. ,..
s k _ __ + s„ .. h.u.- £ . e ,a , .,�:
.... .+
.,. .. .._ _ :. e .. . ,..,�-;'.. . .. E . . .,a . 1. .. ., = u r ,. ;.. ._„ , s z _
# u fi . L v �.;'` r .✓ ::`,a. �. 'd _ .�'a aa' r
, .,. r`a t�. . .. . . , . x.. , M..,- .;3� ._ , s n „t s y . „n , , . .... z ^., . , , .
: :. . ,, ✓ Xr:„ : r . .M.. ,.. , '+ , ,?r.. .. - .�., '53'f
a. , r . . +e^R 7t xxz` . . . a .. . .., ,r_ �;'s. `sx�tt, :-! ,,: x . ., ':- •+ r ->. .Y :. x �ru:.r .
, ,.. :, i n,1 :.,-,q �k ? � Y ., a x 'L w, ep t aX -:.. z s
101111
..r ,. ,a•. . . k > „a.e.- , «, g. �$ ... ... . � .r” Y '3'+Y, .._ k <z; ,X +,,. .::: . :1.. .'r) ,. 'Y .
. . ,: ., Qy, ' ,i ,.-rr . :> i). ,� � f,. n r",:) "3 ¢ 9 ' ,Y .x 'F, '
,'k'
a k...:€ ;s�-<: a�����` -.. ,.r, � d+r +"��r ..,`r�� t' i°ms3=...;a<,�i , ,n C Yr .x :a.s r s , a: ,, n7 :�: r
a .: .'+,_x :,u ,r r ,.,. ... �. :5,:, 5..a:, 'A � �:. f` ) ,».�:z a+�',,. ,::r,..+>•r' . , .°. , � », > 'Wws'�c
x �;' l '.€ '+
w r .
V
having visited there . She assured Ms . Telfer that ALPI will remain as the central agency
for the School Readiness Coalition .` ,_'
In response to questions of Commissioner Macht and Chairman Ginn , Ms . Telfer
advised that funding is requested from agencies that can make allocations available to
assist with offsetting the costs to reduce the waiting lists . In Indian River County
Vi approximately 1 , 200 children are currently enrolled in the programs , but there is a need to
fund an additional 1 , 007 children . Last year they were able to get through the entire
waiting list in 11 days as a result of an additional allocation from DCF . She could not
predict what kind of allocations ALPI would receive this year from DCF . There are
registration deadlines for certain programs , but registration is on - going . As a child leaves
a program , another child can fill that empty slot .
Chairman Ginn had every confidence that ALPI will ably handle this tremendous
job in our community as in the past .
Ms . Telfer thanked the Chairman for her confidence and the opportunity to speak
before the Board .
( CLERK ' S NOTE : A HANDOUT WHICH WAS USED AS AN OUTLINE
GUIDE HAS BEEN PLACED WITH THE BACKUP FOR THE
MEETING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD . )
9 . Be2 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM — STUDENTS WORKING
AGAINST TOBACCO ( SWAT ) — TOBACCO PREVENTION
CAMPAIGN " PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS " —
GRASSROOTS PETITION VI
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 10 , 2001 :
!
January 23 , 2001
57
B PG 843
IV
w 'k
Y
.s s . w + .. `£ ♦ 3':,,'
,..�
re 5 A"& .:=..;« �:5,. fia,,. S`re� .?3z ,1�,^'``j:.;'v, , .»e > �!'.#,� «, . .,..���` ' , w ,a., 'rs''F r ?� . ,. ,,,
1 1 ,y+,,. r:., a . ,r r•+. : r r .. F t . �n ,- a � ! "X` :s
> r a[„ .: , .,'s -r '3”' .yr. r ' .s, C°3YLzt4 . ,,,r,. 3� Y ;s#. �.. e t . zg a., ,1 st r ,:. .
'::,. k Ls ,. .+” rv• ., x;: .. „t. „1Y. `�, 3 'i,#, s g4
>t�^ ., .£,?�✓G;x' , : �r#r~: ,: . K- r . ..t Y . '+¢ ..y,... . a �'. : .c . ., ag �;, ,k a y?, <w �
✓°, r x � -.+ ” } w 46 .!Y ..�'" �'` . c . a...r .„r ev) x €'€�
,. i. ,..= e.,� a, , � . . .e £ `�`+",.. . r ,:xh,.. t°t'^.:,'yy- � _ .s q.: vq t?..�,• fit' ° .ck _.,-, 5 � `v. . ,
f-: ^, ?' ':. ?` ' . , ta:, '- r• t r .f y+ 'a ,
t".%^ 'i' ,?.as - .-zx € ,� & at qv .a. r� :, p °). s +. ?3, ,•, <^ 5 1}i r,r.~ } k.
.
x'fr`r ""' :�
., .,
x<s .r . 9: F ��" ,.. ,' . ._. .•� 'h ',lU p-:. . , i.., :..
�u. IV,
.x
''Y,, , t , F x � �:l.: . , , . .. .� 1 � � .. r : nr . .t: -,s. ,.:. S` r � ,3. .::., 'w' : x � ?,
.r.. v ��,rxt '., ...:' k .. :�,» z k 'S° =. xt`•'.4$.a✓a� � r L 'K2 ,s P"� f ate' Vr,
,�'k -.'£. , r� 5�. ... �..:.,�.e a .r„s. oei��s ;e,.": fi,. ;-. .ars.?. . �n`-�� � °,.,!?- L ,aa n•'aa:`° , . ra,.., t, , x.
.t. ..�'. i; .� k. ;w . „': .,, ,,., .S.'1i�'II' , kr ,, <Aar � , , .,nY �,:Y . °, i. h, _ :v S�'. w. ,.. , ,.-.. a .X.
.. .�r.k"_<. :^�$'4x � d " , .. ,. .,4 ,. xK ._, x r .w._.'f„ ,, "Al
.... .+
.,. .. .._ _ :. e .. . ,..,�-;'.. . .. E . . .,a . 1. .. ., = u r ,. ;.. ._„ , s z _
# u fi . L v �.;'` r .✓ ::`,a. �. 'd _ .�'a aa' r
, .,. r`a t�. . .. . . , . x.. , M..,- .;3� ._ , s n „t s y . „n , , . .... z ^., . , , .
: :. . ,, ✓ Xr:„ : r . .M.. ,.. , '+ , ,?r.. .. - .�., '53'f
a. , r . . +e^R 7t xxz` . . . a .. . .., ,r_ �;'s. `sx�tt, :-! ,,: x . ., ':- •+ r ->. .Y :. x �ru:.r .
, ,.. :, i n,1 :.,-,q �k ? � Y ., a x 'L w, ep t aX -:.. z s
101111
..r ,. ,a•. . . k > „a.e.- , «, g. �$ ... ... . � .r” Y '3'+Y, .._ k <z; ,X +,,. .::: . :1.. .'r) ,. 'Y .
. . ,: ., Qy, ' ,i ,.-rr . :> i). ,� � f,. n r",:) "3 ¢ 9 ' ,Y .x 'F, '
,'k'
a k...:€ ;s�-<: a�����` -.. ,.r, � d+r +"��r ..,`r�� t' i°ms3=...;a<,�i , ,n C Yr .x :a.s r s , a: ,, n7 :�: r
a .: .'+,_x :,u ,r r ,.,. ... �. :5,:, 5..a:, 'A � �:. f` ) ,».�:z a+�',,. ,::r,..+>•r' . , .°. , � », > 'Wws'�c
x �;' l '.€ '+
w r .
V
having visited there . She assured Ms . Telfer that ALPI will remain as the central agency
for the School Readiness Coalition .` ,_'
In response to questions of Commissioner Macht and Chairman Ginn , Ms . Telfer
advised that funding is requested from agencies that can make allocations available to
assist with offsetting the costs to reduce the waiting lists . In Indian River County
Vi approximately 1 , 200 children are currently enrolled in the programs , but there is a need to
fund an additional 1 , 007 children . Last year they were able to get through the entire
waiting list in 11 days as a result of an additional allocation from DCF . She could not
predict what kind of allocations ALPI would receive this year from DCF . There are
registration deadlines for certain programs , but registration is on - going . As a child leaves
a program , another child can fill that empty slot .
Chairman Ginn had every confidence that ALPI will ably handle this tremendous
job in our community as in the past .
Ms . Telfer thanked the Chairman for her confidence and the opportunity to speak
before the Board .
( CLERK ' S NOTE : A HANDOUT WHICH WAS USED AS AN OUTLINE
GUIDE HAS BEEN PLACED WITH THE BACKUP FOR THE
MEETING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD . )
9 . Be2 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM — STUDENTS WORKING
AGAINST TOBACCO ( SWAT ) — TOBACCO PREVENTION
CAMPAIGN " PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS " —
GRASSROOTS PETITION VI
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 10 , 2001 :
!
January 23 , 2001
57
B PG 843
IV
w 'k
Y
.s s . w + .. `£ ♦ 3':,,'
,..�
re 5 A"& .:=..;« �:5,. fia,,. S`re� .?3z ,1�,^'``j:.;'v, , .»e > �!'.#,� «, . .,..���` ' , w ,a., 'rs''F r ?� . ,. ,,,
1 1 ,y+,,. r:., a . ,r r•+. : r r .. F t . �n ,- a � ! "X` :s
> r a[„ .: , .,'s -r '3”' .yr. r ' .s, C°3YLzt4 . ,,,r,. 3� Y ;s#. �.. e t . zg a., ,1 st r ,:. .
'::,. k Ls ,. .+” rv• ., x;: .. „t. „1Y. `�, 3 'i,#, s g4
>t�^ ., .£,?�✓G;x' , : �r#r~: ,: . K- r . ..t Y . '+¢ ..y,... . a �'. : .c . ., ag �;, ,k a y?, <w �
✓°, r x � -.+ ” } w 46 .!Y ..�'" �'` . c . a...r .„r ev) x €'€�
,. i. ,..= e.,� a, , � . . .e £ `�`+",.. . r ,:xh,.. t°t'^.:,'yy- � _ .s q.: vq t?..�,• fit' ° .ck _.,-, 5 � `v. . ,
f-: ^, ?' ':. ?` ' . , ta:, '- r• t r .f y+ 'a ,
t".%^ 'i' ,?.as - .-zx € ,� & at qv .a. r� :, p °). s +. ?3, ,•, <^ 5 1}i r,r.~ } k.
.
x'fr`r ""' :�
., .,
x<s .r . 9: F ��" ,.. ,' . ._. .•� 'h ',lU p-:. . , i.., :..
�u. IV,
.x
''Y,, , t , F x � �:l.: . , , . .. .� 1 � � .. r : nr . .t: -,s. ,.:. S` r � ,3. .::., 'w' : x � ?,
.r.. v ��,rxt '., ...:' k .. :�,» z k 'S° =. xt`•'.4$.a✓a� � r L 'K2 ,s P"� f ate' Vr,
,�'k -.'£. , r� 5�. ... �..:.,�.e a .r„s. oei��s ;e,.": fi,. ;-. .ars.?. . �n`-�� � °,.,!?- L ,aa n•'aa:`° , . ra,.., t, , x.
.t. ..�'. i; .� k. ;w . „': .,, ,,., .S.'1i�'II' , kr ,, <Aar � , , .,nY �,:Y . °, i. h, _ :v S�'. w. ,.. , ,.-.. a .X.
.. .�r.k"_<. :^�$'4x � d " , .. ,. .,4 ,. xK ._, x r .w._.'f„ ,, "Al
.t
u: ,
r t .v ..:.> ✓ . a .z. . x `� .:t;.tt . ,:')i' ... , ., ". 'r.� ..,b: t .. ., r , i
a., >r 3': ,t ti ,'` .m ex';N b
s`
V ..x . .. . ,-
,., ,. . . .a>. .
- xf. . . �'+v. sy,� .� 1. , s � . .;.. >%
, . ,Y,u ,..-.. . w: 4. . d, _ x n.. r.„ , „; el: 43q 'v y.. :` t _ r aE - ty l
t:fi N . . 1 y%v ^•
..3v;: ..7S su. .«. y .. n. .. .
??ee : 3 - ..�.. '
, , . ..a., P • G?S ,�',i #' »' xi}»
,.. � ? �n�.. 3 .r.�• ,:�' .: � �a' w ,,: 4 , _.:_ �,u•' y �}.�j't y^ r'ij,� 1 , ._ . x
. . ., ... ,. �; « ., r s , em t ':
S � � r�9+ q S : . 4 �v J 7 a�'y* n C i "• ) a,:,a �+�. 4 f ? : th Y F
%.�,.. w 4' N i S l* tiff
Memorandum
TO: Ms. Margaret Gunter, Secretary, Indian River County Administrators' Ofnrs
Fane Michelle Sims, Tobacco Prevention Coordinator, Indian River County Health Department
CO Jean Kline , R. N ., AdminIOvtor, Indian River County Health Depanrtront
Dewe January 10, 2001
Rei Students Working Against Tobacco of Indian Rtver County Tobacco Prevention Campaign
Dear Ms . Gunter.
On behalf Of Skxkw to Wonting Against Tobacco (SWAT) of Indian River County, 1 am
requesting placement on the January 23 Board of County Commissioners' meeting
agenda. SWAT is proactively canvassing the community for signatures on a pebbon
directed to the Philip Morris Company tlltfed: "Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Isl'
SWAT is requesting that members of the Board of County Corrnusaioners advocate signing
of the "Put Your Money Where Your Mouth lsr grassroots petition
All SWAT programs throughout the State of Florida are participating in this unprecedented
campaign. The deadline for completion is Febnmry 1 , 2001 , and I will forward petition fors
to the Office of Tobacco Control in Tallahassee, We are seeking the support of our entire
Indian Riper County community.
Thank you for the favorable consideration of my request
u
Michelle Sims , P . O . Box 622 , Wabasso 32970 , introduced members of the Indian
River County SWAT : Stephanie Bailey , vice president , and Mimi VonBoross Toth ,
secretarv .
J
Mimi and Stephanie stated that cigarette smoking is the most preventable cause of
death in the United States . The statewide initiative of SWAT is a call to action to not accept
lies or manipulation from " big tobacco " . SWAT wants to send a strong message to Philip
Morris Company saying " Put your money where your mouth is . " They presented a video of
two current television commercials concerning Philip Morris ' funding of the "Meals on
Wheels " ( feeding elderly shut- ins) program and Crossroads , a shelter for homeless teens .
Mimi and Stephanie advised that the campaign is to expose Philip Morris ' hypocrisy
for spending millions on these videos and book covers for students to build up its corporate
image . They have spent $ 2 million on domestic violence programs , $ 60 million on other
January 23 , 2001
58
10PG 844#
*':'p ice? Ss 3 $°rvv't'y:$ h' y"e„ n'".' ,ti �� �'°3�^s � �y3`.<. s r ✓ � : . t < c 9 '+ r r� r Air K, +
+: 4n ,:, srA-�' x p+ Fd" r � a
c'` "G'Fw� ,. C.,.q + rs�"�� `_`+�. - s tl .a#?2•R „-i ':s. s+:R
€e
*
.}r.; n• f , d %a `2 ..r.. 7 x< , .A . l. 5 x.: � :a> . :�
X
.,�
rr s..,•'�„ r'4�.Kai .d!'�� .. ..�i� .�§'ec?Sb.*. �sc�(� � .a'"��'Stb. .���»rat,u, w. + . _ .;z i:4 x . .. ...§ tix .« . . F .z s _ , ^ .
. i -, _ s _ .. a3. srze , .c ,+. e .-. 8 r ., z_: , x .. . ,w.a . 3'. .. . >
.t
u: ,
r t .v ..:.> ✓ . a .z. . x `� .:t;.tt . ,:')i' ... , ., ". 'r.� ..,b: t .. ., r , i
a., >r 3': ,t ti ,'` .m ex';N b
s`
V ..x . .. . ,-
,., ,. . . .a>. .
- xf. . . �'+v. sy,� .� 1. , s � . .;.. >%
, . ,Y,u ,..-.. . w: 4. . d, _ x n.. r.„ , „; el: 43q 'v y.. :` t _ r aE - ty l
t:fi N . . 1 y%v ^•
..3v;: ..7S su. .«. y .. n. .. .
??ee : 3 - ..�.. '
, , . ..a., P • G?S ,�',i #' »' xi}»
,.. � ? �n�.. 3 .r.�• ,:�' .: � �a' w ,,: 4 , _.:_ �,u•' y �}.�j't y^ r'ij,� 1 , ._ . x
. . ., ... ,. �; « ., r s , em t ':
S � � r�9+ q S : . 4 �v J 7 a�'y* n C i "• ) a,:,a �+�. 4 f ? : th Y F
%.�,.. w 4' N i S l* tiff
Memorandum
TO: Ms. Margaret Gunter, Secretary, Indian River County Administrators' Ofnrs
Fane Michelle Sims, Tobacco Prevention Coordinator, Indian River County Health Department
CO Jean Kline , R. N ., AdminIOvtor, Indian River County Health Depanrtront
Dewe January 10, 2001
Rei Students Working Against Tobacco of Indian Rtver County Tobacco Prevention Campaign
Dear Ms . Gunter.
On behalf Of Skxkw to Wonting Against Tobacco (SWAT) of Indian River County, 1 am
requesting placement on the January 23 Board of County Commissioners' meeting
agenda. SWAT is proactively canvassing the community for signatures on a pebbon
directed to the Philip Morris Company tlltfed: "Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Isl'
SWAT is requesting that members of the Board of County Corrnusaioners advocate signing
of the "Put Your Money Where Your Mouth lsr grassroots petition
All SWAT programs throughout the State of Florida are participating in this unprecedented
campaign. The deadline for completion is Febnmry 1 , 2001 , and I will forward petition fors
to the Office of Tobacco Control in Tallahassee, We are seeking the support of our entire
Indian Riper County community.
Thank you for the favorable consideration of my request
u
Michelle Sims , P . O . Box 622 , Wabasso 32970 , introduced members of the Indian
River County SWAT : Stephanie Bailey , vice president , and Mimi VonBoross Toth ,
secretarv .
J
Mimi and Stephanie stated that cigarette smoking is the most preventable cause of
death in the United States . The statewide initiative of SWAT is a call to action to not accept
lies or manipulation from " big tobacco " . SWAT wants to send a strong message to Philip
Morris Company saying " Put your money where your mouth is . " They presented a video of
two current television commercials concerning Philip Morris ' funding of the "Meals on
Wheels " ( feeding elderly shut- ins) program and Crossroads , a shelter for homeless teens .
Mimi and Stephanie advised that the campaign is to expose Philip Morris ' hypocrisy
for spending millions on these videos and book covers for students to build up its corporate
image . They have spent $ 2 million on domestic violence programs , $ 60 million on other
January 23 , 2001
58
10PG 844#
*':'p ice? Ss 3 $°rvv't'y:$ h' y"e„ n'".' ,ti �� �'°3�^s � �y3`.<. s r ✓ � : . t < c 9 '+ r r� r Air K, +
+: 4n ,:, srA-�' x p+ Fd" r � a
c'` "G'Fw� ,. C.,.q + rs�"�� `_`+�. - s tl .a#?2•R „-i ':s. s+:R
€e
*
.}r.; n• f , d %a `2 ..r.. 7 x< , .A . l. 5 x.: � :a> . :�
X
.,�
rr s..,•'�„ r'4�.Kai .d!'�� .. ..�i� .�§'ec?Sb.*. �sc�(� � .a'"��'Stb. .���»rat,u, w. + . _ .;z i:4 x . .. ...§ tix .« . . F .z s _ , ^ .
. i -, _ s _ .. a3. srze , .c ,+. e .-. 8 r ., z_: , x .. . ,w.a . 3'. .. . >
s. 4 .n.:. 'f k a,.. „ b i : "'.-: t i t -. s, .* 4s: a fr F. ' 1 A '- yt x k77
, r , 4
'( ..� n� . ,x. . :, r .: J .r,. .� x .. 'e
.. , a`^�. ^F -N 4 5ad� a.'4`.. rte, . ,� � ,.. . ..,_if' y:s... u t• : .. .. , k vX .' a ".
a . , ti u.. y 4.ft5 ..'.,5 las <r. yY't't " ':: x' ti... .w�. R a '+ �-3a s z ..u. . ?.,.: , .< - , e . . k` z�d
a y ; ,. .. , .�� + • ;' z, t . s s.Etin"' a fa ' i '' i,a>
y, , .y «ft�4 . ,z ., a �, x,.. Ln�'' . 3 '�"k",sw`x'a ' s ✓'"w yr ,r 4 ?r eY *. r+ ti
+k w .y '... r
iv �K sy 3 y. F .r•�dy;=,roi "a Y, x 3 r " a+ ^,: an.: v +r T r �k '. ry "k . c t'h
e' .•>'w "C kT Hti s`t' h [ w ', , s
'e rY%s
t� .:
charities , and S 108 million on their public relation campaigns . To contrast these amounts ,
the company spent $ 142 million on corporate advertising in the first half of 2000 . SWAT
is sending a video message to the tobacco executives and collecting signatures on petitions .
They believed adult support to be the key for success in this campaign . They asked if the
Commissioners would join them by signing their petition and gathering more signatures .
They suggested that someone from the community sponsor replacement book covers so the
Philip Morris book covers can be sent back . (A copy of the petition was included with the
backup for the meeting . )
Chairman Ginn thought there was no question that the Board would certainly join
them ,
Commissioner Adams was unsure what SWAT hoped to accomplish , and Mimi and
Stephanie pointed out that none of the advertising dollars are being spent to tell teens that
smoking tobacco is harmful to their health .
Commissioner Adams suspected that some of the advertising is the result of the
litigation , and Ms . Sims advised that Philip Morris has spent the money as specified , but
stressed that so much more has been spent on advertising about how Philip Morris has
T 11 supported the charities . SWAT is petitioning Philip Morris to spend more money on the
charities ; there is a disparity between the dollars spent for the charity and their public
relations advertising .
Commissioner Adams understood but , from a business standpoint , they would not
have money to spend for the charities unless they can sell their products , not just cigarettes ,
but other products . They needed to be able to advertise so they would have money to spend
on charity works .
Ms . Sims stressed that SWAT is asking the company to spend more money on the
charities than on advertising their good works . The company does have other products , but
14
January 23 , 2001
59
BK 1 16 PG 8 14 5
K
'r t t C=ai 3 " 4, 8 uv zc aq's4 tsxe �.S.L
ax, * ' rfi* ze ' tR7;7 -7- .iir- a >
F`r :. '"a.�a ::ax ". ' a, y , s :<sF i
r x�a i- �' sJ wv'4Y'✓�a`c% asa",a c �. ��' ? A'�k s*-s�" eC�,� 4 x , '" ar xs x y r 1 ,.0
'9ti: ss b ,b a
t i .;. L � ; ., �W. . . .� .. .n, i '3, :' s"-",'. .d';+"'� a„i � h .• y • c. x. l' M ` 'v �
a .' t ' 's y tz ' .y'". a:, . i � z`` `Cof ''- v
y^ "
Jam' 3R2,
Y r
4� . '" sa§.x
. rx .._. « i krnr•`nfi s,..,.fl-s +. . ev� _$f. . . xra ,.5� , . Y1 .aak ., ... . a,t.:. <, ,. . _ _ . x„ . , .
- ,.. _, , s . .v n . .. x .. . , . E. „ N..., ?ftM >?'.t>a .. r. ., , :ros . , _ 1 ." . � r
s. 4 .n.:. 'f k a,.. „ b i : "'.-: t i t -. s, .* 4s: a fr F. ' 1 A '- yt x k77
, r , 4
'( ..� n� . ,x. . :, r .: J .r,. .� x .. 'e
.. , a`^�. ^F -N 4 5ad� a.'4`.. rte, . ,� � ,.. . ..,_if' y:s... u t• : .. .. , k vX .' a ".
a . , ti u.. y 4.ft5 ..'.,5 las <r. yY't't " ':: x' ti... .w�. R a '+ �-3a s z ..u. . ?.,.: , .< - , e . . k` z�d
a y ; ,. .. , .�� + • ;' z, t . s s.Etin"' a fa ' i '' i,a>
y, , .y «ft�4 . ,z ., a �, x,.. Ln�'' . 3 '�"k",sw`x'a ' s ✓'"w yr ,r 4 ?r eY *. r+ ti
+k w .y '... r
iv �K sy 3 y. F .r•�dy;=,roi "a Y, x 3 r " a+ ^,: an.: v +r T r �k '. ry "k . c t'h
e' .•>'w "C kT Hti s`t' h [ w ', , s
'e rY%s
t� .:
charities , and S 108 million on their public relation campaigns . To contrast these amounts ,
the company spent $ 142 million on corporate advertising in the first half of 2000 . SWAT
is sending a video message to the tobacco executives and collecting signatures on petitions .
They believed adult support to be the key for success in this campaign . They asked if the
Commissioners would join them by signing their petition and gathering more signatures .
They suggested that someone from the community sponsor replacement book covers so the
Philip Morris book covers can be sent back . (A copy of the petition was included with the
backup for the meeting . )
Chairman Ginn thought there was no question that the Board would certainly join
them ,
Commissioner Adams was unsure what SWAT hoped to accomplish , and Mimi and
Stephanie pointed out that none of the advertising dollars are being spent to tell teens that
smoking tobacco is harmful to their health .
Commissioner Adams suspected that some of the advertising is the result of the
litigation , and Ms . Sims advised that Philip Morris has spent the money as specified , but
stressed that so much more has been spent on advertising about how Philip Morris has
T 11 supported the charities . SWAT is petitioning Philip Morris to spend more money on the
charities ; there is a disparity between the dollars spent for the charity and their public
relations advertising .
Commissioner Adams understood but , from a business standpoint , they would not
have money to spend for the charities unless they can sell their products , not just cigarettes ,
but other products . They needed to be able to advertise so they would have money to spend
on charity works .
Ms . Sims stressed that SWAT is asking the company to spend more money on the
charities than on advertising their good works . The company does have other products , but
14
January 23 , 2001
59
BK 1 16 PG 8 14 5
K
'r t t C=ai 3 " 4, 8 uv zc aq's4 tsxe �.S.L
ax, * ' rfi* ze ' tR7;7 -7- .iir- a >
F`r :. '"a.�a ::ax ". ' a, y , s :<sF i
r x�a i- �' sJ wv'4Y'✓�a`c% asa",a c �. ��' ? A'�k s*-s�" eC�,� 4 x , '" ar xs x y r 1 ,.0
'9ti: ss b ,b a
t i .;. L � ; ., �W. . . .� .. .n, i '3, :' s"-",'. .d';+"'� a„i � h .• y • c. x. l' M ` 'v �
a .' t ' 's y tz ' .y'". a:, . i � z`` `Cof ''- v
y^ "
Jam' 3R2,
Y r
4� . '" sa§.x
. rx .._. « i krnr•`nfi s,..,.fl-s +. . ev� _$f. . . xra ,.5� , . Y1 .aak ., ... . a,t.:. <, ,. . _ _ . x„ . , .
- ,.. _, , s . .v n . .. x .. . , . E. „ N..., ?ftM >?'.t>a .. r. ., , :ros . , _ 1 ." . � r
s t w 4 •. a € t L v rt r d x .,,,u y J ;'*"
'�` `, ,'p,rpy "..{ i't,,v+l , vv, y'& . ;#w.<t a jc 1iv?,+' c „»,: " F . z a . •,: el
ell
e
, . 5 '.
., -
.e k 33 S n
'
tobacco is a major part of the Philip Morris Company ,
Chairman Ginn thought the company should also be reminded about the millions of
Medicare dollars that are being spent because of diseases resulting from smoking .
Commissioner Tippin had a concern about government getting involved in this
campaign . Although he does not like to see smoking promoted , there are many other things
in the world he does not like . He felt that government should not get involved in telling
businesses how to spend their advertising dollars .
Ms . Sims respectfully submitted that the SWAT program is in part funded as a result
of the tobacco industry ' s legal settlement and there are no governmental ties with what the
students are doing . They are merely asking the Board to support SWAT in a way they feel
comfortable .
Commissioner Macht suggested that the tobacco industry could be asked to mount a
1 campaign to point out the dangers and downside of smoking to young people , and Chairman
Ginn pointed out that would affect the bottom line so the Board could not expect the industry
to do that .
Commissioner Adams suggested it would be more appropriate for the Commissioners
to act personally , not as a Commission . She lost her father due to lung cancer and her
mother has severe emphysema directly due to smoking . She knew of the dependency of
North Carolina ' s economy on tobacco for many years . She could not agree with a
government effort to tell them how to spend their advertising dollars , but suggested they be
encouraged use those dollars in other ways rather than making demands .
Nancy McLain , SWAT coordinator for Indian River County , stated that the tobacco
industry is trying to come out on top again . She specified that they spend $ 13 million per
day advertising tobacco products , so along with the advertising about the good they do for
the charitable organizations , they are still selling a product that is dangerous and,
January 23 , 2001
60
o
P ) 00
- r# fit''vAx iK "�a
e 'rs .+*4:.1+,}t
y, E'i ✓ �"
ell
1 t t
J i h. 3 4 <! Ixl . § •^ 5 h T.at- 4. arm t¢ U 4bMt" s 4 A ! S ! ? _ Y f
h 111"p,
4 Yi L
x f xF1a - rc�Zt , fix vx ,,F " h5x( yh Sar , r '- t { w ` `f +'x, ': w
,
3
! aFA 3` a'F��v-m e rw � < - y ... , ., -, _ s
.b.2Re . - �w rv"�°ee"rt. s r&(M ��fii:"� . v ^A . � �4a Fr i. .`�'a��r' i . �. �� .. _ �x s . _ , �, . . r1 ,. r
._ u _ s � . . r f ' „ _ .. . .w .. . . . , v
s t w 4 •. a € t L v rt r d x .,,,u y J ;'*"
'�` `, ,'p,rpy "..{ i't,,v+l , vv, y'& . ;#w.<t a jc 1iv?,+' c „»,: " F . z a . •,: el
ell
e
, . 5 '.
., -
.e k 33 S n
'
tobacco is a major part of the Philip Morris Company ,
Chairman Ginn thought the company should also be reminded about the millions of
Medicare dollars that are being spent because of diseases resulting from smoking .
Commissioner Tippin had a concern about government getting involved in this
campaign . Although he does not like to see smoking promoted , there are many other things
in the world he does not like . He felt that government should not get involved in telling
businesses how to spend their advertising dollars .
Ms . Sims respectfully submitted that the SWAT program is in part funded as a result
of the tobacco industry ' s legal settlement and there are no governmental ties with what the
students are doing . They are merely asking the Board to support SWAT in a way they feel
comfortable .
Commissioner Macht suggested that the tobacco industry could be asked to mount a
1 campaign to point out the dangers and downside of smoking to young people , and Chairman
Ginn pointed out that would affect the bottom line so the Board could not expect the industry
to do that .
Commissioner Adams suggested it would be more appropriate for the Commissioners
to act personally , not as a Commission . She lost her father due to lung cancer and her
mother has severe emphysema directly due to smoking . She knew of the dependency of
North Carolina ' s economy on tobacco for many years . She could not agree with a
government effort to tell them how to spend their advertising dollars , but suggested they be
encouraged use those dollars in other ways rather than making demands .
Nancy McLain , SWAT coordinator for Indian River County , stated that the tobacco
industry is trying to come out on top again . She specified that they spend $ 13 million per
day advertising tobacco products , so along with the advertising about the good they do for
the charitable organizations , they are still selling a product that is dangerous and,
January 23 , 2001
60
o
P ) 00
- r# fit''vAx iK "�a
e 'rs .+*4:.1+,}t
y, E'i ✓ �"
ell
1 t t
J i h. 3 4 <! Ixl . § •^ 5 h T.at- 4. arm t¢ U 4bMt" s 4 A ! S ! ? _ Y f
h 111"p,
4 Yi L
x f xF1a - rc�Zt , fix vx ,,F " h5x( yh Sar , r '- t { w ` `f +'x, ': w
,
3
! aFA 3` a'F��v-m e rw � < - y ... , ., -, _ s
.b.2Re . - �w rv"�°ee"rt. s r&(M ��fii:"� . v ^A . � �4a Fr i. .`�'a��r' i . �. �� .. _ �x s . _ , �, . . r1 ,. r
._ u _ s � . . r f ' „ _ .. . .w .. . . . , v
}` `? " T� ¢ ;^`' g „. w �c. . x � y5','a wv�'$ 5. ' 1 x *�` z yc '� f 4�>, z s ^ z t �},a•
t `.r
T i x„ � x.'vk s '� '.'3" `iv_:':c�;x+R'`i `t v»„i�k s5* a7:�d"# t -+' z�t`w fY n •m .a z x t, � t
� . . r .., t ze ti .a 4 >z , X rr ` nt
�+'+s`5 s � yr � m�"'�� Z a'� � � ^"� 'n ���.?wdi� :+.wt 3 <� . ln 4 •i+ r s j d
a y a
Wt t" . ,A,.�s ;. . s 7�, � f , „k ..;n ,?...,,�'^ ' s �, � - � •x'+., ax ....'��S z� , fiz�,r 7,*i.,
�'� r �,-3k T� ' N4 n a,„ti" ^f. ! ''« d� S*� ,f �S •a
unfortunately . she has little control over what can be done . The children are trying to convey
a message that the tobacco industry is doing a good thing , but they are still making a product
that is very dangerous . They are targeting the youth , their consumers for the next 20 - 30
years , not adults .
Chairman Ginn thought SWAT is taking the right stand and hoped their campaign
would be successful .
( CLERK ' S NOTE : A FACT SHEET PRESENTED TO THE BOARD
HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE BACKUP OF THE MEETING
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD . )
9 . B . 3 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FOR UTILITY
FEES AND CHARGES REIMBURSEMENT- RON AND JUNE GAUDET
( ORCHARD PARK MOBILE HOME PARK AND RON ' S ISLAND
COURT MOBILE HOME PARK)
Utility Services Director Donald R . Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of January 5 ,
2001 and a Vendor Ledger dated 10 - 01 - 99 to 0 1 - 03 - 01 for Mr . Ron Gaudet :
DATE : JANUARY 5, 2001
TO : JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM : DONALD R HUBBS, P
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY:S;
SUBJECT : UTILITY REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST
BACKGROUND
Mr . Ron Gaudet, the owner of Orchard Park Mobile Home Park, and Ron ' s Island Court
Mobile Home Park, is seeking reimbursement of certain utility fees and charges . On
November 30 , 2000, a meeting was held to discuss the feasibility of certain fees and
charges with the Assistant County Administrator, the Gaudets, and the County Attorney ' s
office ; along with representatives of Utilities Services . To date, Mr. Gaudet has been
reimbursed the amount paid to purchase ERUs at $28 ,350. 00, half the base facility
charge, at $ 14, 888 . 25 , as well as half the franchise fee . ( See attached Vendor Ledger) .
January 23 , 2001
61
BN 118 1QG 8 4 7
77
`-� � <n [� +£ `t t »} + ,• s �xT� ,� aT nml F t r r ri: rq 1 :%_
i
}` `? " T� ¢ ;^`' g „. w �c. . x � y5','a wv�'$ 5. ' 1 x *�` z yc '� f 4�>, z s ^ z t �},a•
t `.r
T i x„ � x.'vk s '� '.'3" `iv_:':c�;x+R'`i `t v»„i�k s5* a7:�d"# t -+' z�t`w fY n •m .a z x t, � t
� . . r .., t ze ti .a 4 >z , X rr ` nt
�+'+s`5 s � yr � m�"'�� Z a'� � � ^"� 'n ���.?wdi� :+.wt 3 <� . ln 4 •i+ r s j d
a y a
Wt t" . ,A,.�s ;. . s 7�, � f , „k ..;n ,?...,,�'^ ' s �, � - � •x'+., ax ....'��S z� , fiz�,r 7,*i.,
�'� r �,-3k T� ' N4 n a,„ti" ^f. ! ''« d� S*� ,f �S •a
unfortunately . she has little control over what can be done . The children are trying to convey
a message that the tobacco industry is doing a good thing , but they are still making a product
that is very dangerous . They are targeting the youth , their consumers for the next 20 - 30
years , not adults .
Chairman Ginn thought SWAT is taking the right stand and hoped their campaign
would be successful .
( CLERK ' S NOTE : A FACT SHEET PRESENTED TO THE BOARD
HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE BACKUP OF THE MEETING
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD . )
9 . B . 3 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FOR UTILITY
FEES AND CHARGES REIMBURSEMENT- RON AND JUNE GAUDET
( ORCHARD PARK MOBILE HOME PARK AND RON ' S ISLAND
COURT MOBILE HOME PARK)
Utility Services Director Donald R . Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of January 5 ,
2001 and a Vendor Ledger dated 10 - 01 - 99 to 0 1 - 03 - 01 for Mr . Ron Gaudet :
DATE : JANUARY 5, 2001
TO : JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM : DONALD R HUBBS, P
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY:S;
SUBJECT : UTILITY REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST
BACKGROUND
Mr . Ron Gaudet, the owner of Orchard Park Mobile Home Park, and Ron ' s Island Court
Mobile Home Park, is seeking reimbursement of certain utility fees and charges . On
November 30 , 2000, a meeting was held to discuss the feasibility of certain fees and
charges with the Assistant County Administrator, the Gaudets, and the County Attorney ' s
office ; along with representatives of Utilities Services . To date, Mr. Gaudet has been
reimbursed the amount paid to purchase ERUs at $28 ,350. 00, half the base facility
charge, at $ 14, 888 . 25 , as well as half the franchise fee . ( See attached Vendor Ledger) .
January 23 , 2001
61
BN 118 1QG 8 4 7
77
`-� � <n [� +£ `t t »} + ,• s �xT� ,� aT nml F t r r ri: rq 1 :%_
i
x�,^ �f.,y
�. .. . . , ..r , .. . �. . . . :� ... . . M .3, . 5*a - . .,. E ' ,.«. _. .,., . . y .> « ..» .vC'. { 'n
i . .. :+ ,,,.:, z .* ° . :? .`.. . i. :i. v: .. ,.n,. , z"s�:.:,, � �, r z,�`
��,:f }� .. ,� . w . rtik .. . r . rt . '. .e r,. .�1.. .. ....4• w n . . Y i..x
a
P ,» s a : , a`. 5 ,,. L Ws2`' t t s.. ..? :, F ...s+ ,. . w +' *eS ` cr+S
n , j., C,n,..a' 5. Y. "e y q f2'ry," � ,$
, :,l• t.. 2�,,.�wa. ., . . ., . .. �s � .r . '. 3^ .. ,,., . ... ,.w. . m3 a.' Z' z .z '�" v r+ ,. '2 �- ..
5 x ,.... , .. See "�(; ,. A` F...;.,,�
� aK*
,Yk.3 ' . , t E, . . . .>.: ASfs t,s g"r =s+' „+*' ys S •t- -x s, ,� { : 'P r •
. . 4. 3`. 4 t,
sr� : v, , . �3.�' �x •,„ , .,. rt , �'2 .::,, : '.,,^.a.�� �•,.9.s:: f'.'i � a ' .%�,*• , , , _ = 5-. �".
s *s Pt ,�; wt ; i' "J, ,�. „e�x;�; 3
„ ^: s� � `t h F.w
, X
11 IL
Mr. Gaudet has requested that back interest be paid, as well as other possible payments,
and has asked to address the issue with the Board of County Commissioners . (See
attached request) .
RECOMMENDATION
Due to the precedent-setting nature of interest reimbursement, it is recommended that the
Board of County Commissioners deny the request to reimburse back interest payments,and that the Board continue to comply
with County Ordinance 201 , and the provisions
thereof.
NBADSP62 VENDOR LEDGER FOR 10 - 01 - 1999 - 01 - 03 - 2001
073343 GAUDET , RON
Invoice No . Inv Date PO # Check # Date * * Amount * *
ERU REIMBURSEMT 11 - 27 - 2000 000000 293285 11 - 30 - 2000 28 , 350 . 00
REIMB / FRANCHIS 12 - 06 - 2000 000000 293817 12 - 07 - 2000 14 , 916 . 25
REIMB / FRANCHIS 12 - 06 - 2000 000000 293817 12 - 07 - 2000 913 . 95
yy � go zo
Administrator Chandler pointed out that the question before the Board is whether or
not any additional funds should be paid to Mr . Gaudet in addition to those already
reimbursed in accordance with County policy . He explained that this is an enterprise fund ,
with bonding requirements and covenants , thus a concern has arisen concerning Mr .
Gaudet ' s request that interest be paid on the refunded dollars .
Director Hubbs then explained the reasoning and figures on the above Vendor Ledger
and responded to questions of the Commissioners . It was established that sewer lines are not
available to the property owned by Mr . Gaudet .
Assistant Administrator Joseph Baird reviewed the policy for refunding only half of
the base facility charge and explained that Mr . Gaudet should have initially paid half, so he
was reimbursed the other half that had been charged .
Commissioner Adams did not understand the policy , and Mr . Baird further explained
the reasons why base facility charges are charged in advance of providing service . If a base
facility charge is not charged to reserve capacity , then other rate payers would have to pay
for it .
January 23 , 2001
62
8 U8
d '�' ,..z ? ,„ia ' d.; . .&w .,:: , . . . . •�' � ,:.».::n'd" '.c'ti” ; ;, . ..- :... t .;� z .�k'�J`.e;C« .�—«.
, :... s.-..: w x s .z d !
`'' .
*.�iS� . �h 2 y. . i�Y ^i . . .:•. �,As : i } ul'. : .- l u,x' 4 w` .K . .a ,'4 . "�
'+Y a -.. �n i rtl:- "ai r:v', } ,.. ; ?i i +#'S-:'? k ! +' '• ,, ;W „}:..:. x~=sr, ( S
s „ty, „#4• Sr' " a * r
#, .,,,,.
.. ..+:« ,; P'1 �r .{... . r m r. , .. . .,;;< i„ x , ax, t .n,.. „* . n •t _. '. ?
e ,x n x hr 4 s "is F
r, ^ .xrFe r a . .>.a„,- t o . k ` t z%,i. '•. E':, ° .a. " s , . .. ! '` .. , ,»✓ Y✓
it 4 � .s..z?' T« a ,stir ,. p r
3 E�,B : .,'L. d :• k r :.. . , > 'F.. d , I`,. 'W . SY. tj S • ,Y+
.� .. r. ..,£: . z44• . .rt. 44�.. �x ;. . . . 1 :' f ° ".:Z � � :".. N. �i:^ n• fe a ':.^�
t . .. n-::3. I✓� J Itihir
nq /rr . r � . . ..r. p . . :._.. r , .-s. t«§ 5,. �. £3 , .: tt „:
�-„n , v :.s ? r ., . ; y w,- n;.,':r;.. x �: .� �,..,q, s : , ..r cr .:•- x rz, i ,?, ±
,r . s', k^ P i °.�,h .% . L^Ez? sr. 2 . r , r �'
t Fr's � .4 a« v , ter: P .�%• .• w., +{. i , ? F.. i 3 :. ,t. , e.. � x3, s •.:,x
`whit - �a< , �,'�` r�;«: ' . )N:: . 'tc..?,:v - 9
> .i: .., + :;. n = as -' �' s "" ^:<.k 7 F N n ":, x .,r' xi .,�:.. .. r :':: a :
a , x r, A .:. n ap':,`,Nt9 s x . .,:fin xt'• . .» . r=:
.,:rqq��.- r'” s � .,,' s s ��� . ' '�: '� '«.•.,,, r F<.}-. f ., , -.,.,. t•.'1. , . :.< z { . xy , . ..a
.,: k ask [` •w; 1 .,. .. . .�+ � a `r. . . � r » .. , � rr . �
. •" ....?�.a1„x .t.Y} ,n...n7Y. �'!�e�.. '� „•`-t . � .xa^ ..m , Ssl€3:t�' a"S.. s. «. s-h.a�xc.. a c. , »s, v . , r_ , x o,».. , ,.
i s,Sv-.v . : , , . r .... . . .; ,w . ..,;..ry � �?r.. _,,. « ., r. _ ,:.e<i _ 5' , Fs.n� .. x .�*.9"i "s='fo ,» w�., a.,. 5`ar:< 3 ,.
, a .:Asx' . . . v+ , .,... � ., . .. .
x�,^ �f.,y
�. .. . . , ..r , .. . �. . . . :� ... . . M .3, . 5*a - . .,. E ' ,.«. _. .,., . . y .> « ..» .vC'. { 'n
i . .. :+ ,,,.:, z .* ° . :? .`.. . i. :i. v: .. ,.n,. , z"s�:.:,, � �, r z,�`
��,:f }� .. ,� . w . rtik .. . r . rt . '. .e r,. .�1.. .. ....4• w n . . Y i..x
a
P ,» s a : , a`. 5 ,,. L Ws2`' t t s.. ..? :, F ...s+ ,. . w +' *eS ` cr+S
n , j., C,n,..a' 5. Y. "e y q f2'ry," � ,$
, :,l• t.. 2�,,.�wa. ., . . ., . .. �s � .r . '. 3^ .. ,,., . ... ,.w. . m3 a.' Z' z .z '�" v r+ ,. '2 �- ..
5 x ,.... , .. See "�(; ,. A` F...;.,,�
� aK*
,Yk.3 ' . , t E, . . . .>.: ASfs t,s g"r =s+' „+*' ys S •t- -x s, ,� { : 'P r •
. . 4. 3`. 4 t,
sr� : v, , . �3.�' �x •,„ , .,. rt , �'2 .::,, : '.,,^.a.�� �•,.9.s:: f'.'i � a ' .%�,*• , , , _ = 5-. �".
s *s Pt ,�; wt ; i' "J, ,�. „e�x;�; 3
„ ^: s� � `t h F.w
, X
11 IL
Mr. Gaudet has requested that back interest be paid, as well as other possible payments,
and has asked to address the issue with the Board of County Commissioners . (See
attached request) .
RECOMMENDATION
Due to the precedent-setting nature of interest reimbursement, it is recommended that the
Board of County Commissioners deny the request to reimburse back interest payments,and that the Board continue to comply
with County Ordinance 201 , and the provisions
thereof.
NBADSP62 VENDOR LEDGER FOR 10 - 01 - 1999 - 01 - 03 - 2001
073343 GAUDET , RON
Invoice No . Inv Date PO # Check # Date * * Amount * *
ERU REIMBURSEMT 11 - 27 - 2000 000000 293285 11 - 30 - 2000 28 , 350 . 00
REIMB / FRANCHIS 12 - 06 - 2000 000000 293817 12 - 07 - 2000 14 , 916 . 25
REIMB / FRANCHIS 12 - 06 - 2000 000000 293817 12 - 07 - 2000 913 . 95
yy � go zo
Administrator Chandler pointed out that the question before the Board is whether or
not any additional funds should be paid to Mr . Gaudet in addition to those already
reimbursed in accordance with County policy . He explained that this is an enterprise fund ,
with bonding requirements and covenants , thus a concern has arisen concerning Mr .
Gaudet ' s request that interest be paid on the refunded dollars .
Director Hubbs then explained the reasoning and figures on the above Vendor Ledger
and responded to questions of the Commissioners . It was established that sewer lines are not
available to the property owned by Mr . Gaudet .
Assistant Administrator Joseph Baird reviewed the policy for refunding only half of
the base facility charge and explained that Mr . Gaudet should have initially paid half, so he
was reimbursed the other half that had been charged .
Commissioner Adams did not understand the policy , and Mr . Baird further explained
the reasons why base facility charges are charged in advance of providing service . If a base
facility charge is not charged to reserve capacity , then other rate payers would have to pay
for it .
January 23 , 2001
62
8 U8
d '�' ,..z ? ,„ia ' d.; . .&w .,:: , . . . . •�' � ,:.».::n'd" '.c'ti” ; ;, . ..- :... t .;� z .�k'�J`.e;C« .�—«.
, :... s.-..: w x s .z d !
`'' .
*.�iS� . �h 2 y. . i�Y ^i . . .:•. �,As : i } ul'. : .- l u,x' 4 w` .K . .a ,'4 . "�
'+Y a -.. �n i rtl:- "ai r:v', } ,.. ; ?i i +#'S-:'? k ! +' '• ,, ;W „}:..:. x~=sr, ( S
s „ty, „#4• Sr' " a * r
#, .,,,,.
.. ..+:« ,; P'1 �r .{... . r m r. , .. . .,;;< i„ x , ax, t .n,.. „* . n •t _. '. ?
e ,x n x hr 4 s "is F
r, ^ .xrFe r a . .>.a„,- t o . k ` t z%,i. '•. E':, ° .a. " s , . .. ! '` .. , ,»✓ Y✓
it 4 � .s..z?' T« a ,stir ,. p r
3 E�,B : .,'L. d :• k r :.. . , > 'F.. d , I`,. 'W . SY. tj S • ,Y+
.� .. r. ..,£: . z44• . .rt. 44�.. �x ;. . . . 1 :' f ° ".:Z � � :".. N. �i:^ n• fe a ':.^�
t . .. n-::3. I✓� J Itihir
nq /rr . r � . . ..r. p . . :._.. r , .-s. t«§ 5,. �. £3 , .: tt „:
�-„n , v :.s ? r ., . ; y w,- n;.,':r;.. x �: .� �,..,q, s : , ..r cr .:•- x rz, i ,?, ±
,r . s', k^ P i °.�,h .% . L^Ez? sr. 2 . r , r �'
t Fr's � .4 a« v , ter: P .�%• .• w., +{. i , ? F.. i 3 :. ,t. , e.. � x3, s •.:,x
`whit - �a< , �,'�` r�;«: ' . )N:: . 'tc..?,:v - 9
> .i: .., + :;. n = as -' �' s "" ^:<.k 7 F N n ":, x .,r' xi .,�:.. .. r :':: a :
a , x r, A .:. n ap':,`,Nt9 s x . .,:fin xt'• . .» . r=:
.,:rqq��.- r'” s � .,,' s s ��� . ' '�: '� '«.•.,,, r F<.}-. f ., , -.,.,. t•.'1. , . :.< z { . xy , . ..a
.,: k ask [` •w; 1 .,. .. . .�+ � a `r. . . � r » .. , � rr . �
. •" ....?�.a1„x .t.Y} ,n...n7Y. �'!�e�.. '� „•`-t . � .xa^ ..m , Ssl€3:t�' a"S.. s. «. s-h.a�xc.. a c. , »s, v . , r_ , x o,».. , ,.
i s,Sv-.v . : , , . r .... . . .; ,w . ..,;..ry � �?r.. _,,. « ., r. _ ,:.e<i _ 5' , Fs.n� .. x .�*.9"i "s='fo ,» w�., a.,. 5`ar:< 3 ,.
, a .:Asx' . . . v+ , .,... � ., . .. .
e 2.5'„ s. v'' v'>"'-s. . - a, •
:c: >"f> . Pr '. > shqll
rs` L, , .
. { zgif�
ai
fttt
gg4000
„ ,.vra3 .
IT
aw,'`,•e•.,.'—z;...
4�t.;zNsx'��+S�'•�:✓z.e.4x;r+et^h5
r :
Commissioner Adams felt that by the County requiring and charging this base facility
charge the customer is entitled to expect that a line will run by their property . She agreed
the County should not pay Mr . Gaudet interest, but thought he should have gotten all his
money back since the County could not perform and provide service . She agreed to listen .
Ron Gaudet , 6635 110t' Place, Sebastian , advised that he had built his first home in
1979 in Sebastian Highlands and he was here in the beginning when ( former Utilities
Director) Terry Pinto was trying to fund the North County Waste Department . He attended
all the informational meetings held and has all the papers from those meetings . ( CLERK ' S
NOTE : Mr . Gaudet presented 23 pages of backup materials which have been placed in the
file in the office of the Clerk to the Board . ) He has two mobile home parks : 8 units at 8050
US I and another with 12 units at 87 ” and 55 " Street opposite the driveway to John ' s Island
Golf Course West . On the advice of Mr . Pinto and a former employee , Ernestine Williams ,
he purchased the ERU ' s back in 1989 because he would save a lot of money over the cost
of ERU ' s in the future . They would finance it over 10 years at 9 - 3 /4 % . He went to every
meeting and asked Mr . Pinto after the meeting on several occasions if the lines were coming
in front of his property and was told "yes " . He has witnesses , but did not bring them along .
The ERU ' s were offered at $ 1 , 250 each in a notice dated February 1987 . On February 24 ,
1989 , he signed three contracts (because he relied on what he had been told and did not have
an attorney ) with the County , one ERU for his home , 12 for Ron ' s Island Court , and 8 for
Orchard Park Mobile Home Park , for a total of 21 ERU ' s at $ 1 , 350 each , for a total
of
$ 28 , 350 ( at $ 100 each higher than originally quoted ) . Most of the property owners at the
meetings signed up . He received a 1 /30/91 letter saying the lines were in , but there was no
line in front of his property . He described his frequent visits to Mr . Pinto ' s office and how
all the people in the Utilities Department office knew him . Mr . Pinto continued to assure
a
January 23 , 2001
63
- B PGu49
,g`e*rzkgg
;3c:'tx v
x:.ms �a . ¢' . „ :. . » ;a,zt h ” „,t . ,S . . .., f+ , _ 4 .,,
i g�+3snTT,, <; ., "f,r .� `A. t v,a•.t ns, , M 1 3 1 s y 7 z t r „+ b K �n't
,r:..0 '� Lg. `s s 3. . ;
k .�. a ,F';:� a, r, m:- xa 'cy r s r: T t ,.:U � < t w,''..s `l. a} n� •
5"' re „
f ..,.. . -} � .k5= t- G :�E t r S. � 5 .. �`t" a , � A s 3- .''.. � r gs, ..a\s'" ar
,,s.. 4, „" k`. . "<.. #-"+ 5
N
Y �i. al F x ""• a .;a Yw � }ti, R
a
v: 4;::Jr x £',nil4en Md Yd'.�t±: ,«'•, 2T ., >t,�
f
6 . ,,.,,,.+, iw sis.._... � .. - .y, . . ,. . - v s ,,...... Y , _•. a. , . . ,. ., M1 r : f „a.;^' .
. sP " r '`. st =. , ,. �`, r .�wr 0. d^2�:W ` '�*�':nr< . td
k .. ,b, t ,..`}.},„�,: ?:.. . . ; ttf-. s*e „ �'{, ><tiA.: .. . .���; .6, ..':.. „+-,.: ,, ri ,.s••". r'- z, } }::: ? . , r ,;,.. ,
� :,.. d ..:,. p ..
1+4 �t,��4K '°3-xr4;"v�"„ai4'.i��G' e2$' 'h`��i:'^`�n-�F2,xs:�*.� tc€ •. ". 3..Ah.- ",.,.urs @a,-ny, �. . .t..n..„gig . r, , s�>rx.at »v. ,<a..,v
. ” nv;t ... .3:- , =s . _. . P , n . -.. . :� . a . f_ a"S e, a` s.a.4 : �` T", r v' : .,. �� � {�,.e92.`?vP�. , .,rw
, it � + ,.Yz, , u ,c. sEz .. .
e 2.5'„ s. v'' v'>"'-s. . - a, •
:c: >"f> . Pr '. > shqll
rs` L, , .
. { zgif�
ai
fttt
gg4000
„ ,.vra3 .
IT
aw,'`,•e•.,.'—z;...
4�t.;zNsx'��+S�'•�:✓z.e.4x;r+et^h5
r :
Commissioner Adams felt that by the County requiring and charging this base facility
charge the customer is entitled to expect that a line will run by their property . She agreed
the County should not pay Mr . Gaudet interest, but thought he should have gotten all his
money back since the County could not perform and provide service . She agreed to listen .
Ron Gaudet , 6635 110t' Place, Sebastian , advised that he had built his first home in
1979 in Sebastian Highlands and he was here in the beginning when ( former Utilities
Director) Terry Pinto was trying to fund the North County Waste Department . He attended
all the informational meetings held and has all the papers from those meetings . ( CLERK ' S
NOTE : Mr . Gaudet presented 23 pages of backup materials which have been placed in the
file in the office of the Clerk to the Board . ) He has two mobile home parks : 8 units at 8050
US I and another with 12 units at 87 ” and 55 " Street opposite the driveway to John ' s Island
Golf Course West . On the advice of Mr . Pinto and a former employee , Ernestine Williams ,
he purchased the ERU ' s back in 1989 because he would save a lot of money over the cost
of ERU ' s in the future . They would finance it over 10 years at 9 - 3 /4 % . He went to every
meeting and asked Mr . Pinto after the meeting on several occasions if the lines were coming
in front of his property and was told "yes " . He has witnesses , but did not bring them along .
The ERU ' s were offered at $ 1 , 250 each in a notice dated February 1987 . On February 24 ,
1989 , he signed three contracts (because he relied on what he had been told and did not have
an attorney ) with the County , one ERU for his home , 12 for Ron ' s Island Court , and 8 for
Orchard Park Mobile Home Park , for a total of 21 ERU ' s at $ 1 , 350 each , for a total
of
$ 28 , 350 ( at $ 100 each higher than originally quoted ) . Most of the property owners at the
meetings signed up . He received a 1 /30/91 letter saying the lines were in , but there was no
line in front of his property . He described his frequent visits to Mr . Pinto ' s office and how
all the people in the Utilities Department office knew him . Mr . Pinto continued to assure
a
January 23 , 2001
63
- B PGu49
,g`e*rzkgg
;3c:'tx v
x:.ms �a . ¢' . „ :. . » ;a,zt h ” „,t . ,S . . .., f+ , _ 4 .,,
i g�+3snTT,, <; ., "f,r .� `A. t v,a•.t ns, , M 1 3 1 s y 7 z t r „+ b K �n't
,r:..0 '� Lg. `s s 3. . ;
k .�. a ,F';:� a, r, m:- xa 'cy r s r: T t ,.:U � < t w,''..s `l. a} n� •
5"' re „
f ..,.. . -} � .k5= t- G :�E t r S. � 5 .. �`t" a , � A s 3- .''.. � r gs, ..a\s'" ar
,,s.. 4, „" k`. . "<.. #-"+ 5
N
Y �i. al F x ""• a .;a Yw � }ti, R
a
v: 4;::Jr x £',nil4en Md Yd'.�t±: ,«'•, 2T ., >t,�
f
6 . ,,.,,,.+, iw sis.._... � .. - .y, . . ,. . - v s ,,...... Y , _•. a. , . . ,. ., M1 r : f „a.;^' .
. sP " r '`. st =. , ,. �`, r .�wr 0. d^2�:W ` '�*�':nr< . td
k .. ,b, t ,..`}.},„�,: ?:.. . . ; ttf-. s*e „ �'{, ><tiA.: .. . .���; .6, ..':.. „+-,.: ,, ri ,.s••". r'- z, } }::: ? . , r ,;,.. ,
� :,.. d ..:,. p ..
1+4 �t,��4K '°3-xr4;"v�"„ai4'.i��G' e2$' 'h`��i:'^`�n-�F2,xs:�*.� tc€ •. ". 3..Ah.- ",.,.urs @a,-ny, �. . .t..n..„gig . r, , s�>rx.at »v. ,<a..,v
. ” nv;t ... .3:- , =s . _. . P , n . -.. . :� . a . f_ a"S e, a` s.a.4 : �` T", r v' : .,. �� � {�,.e92.`?vP�. , .,rw
, it � + ,.Yz, , u ,c. sEz .. .
s T ,z*
a : ... - :}.. . ~Y •v ax .t, £ S v p•v s'- i,# .. ,, , r . .. .::. J # r wd.... rn
S-, I'V
.r, Vf' t x '�%. � � #+i a:.)�a
d arA ,:. h �. •. :.v. � .: . . f .. ... ., 1# .35 M1 . r . , 3 � Y ... ... , f
m : . x �. -•t }z xy; f. ,:t . y .�;' r w s
,
a
x , ,. .. . .., � .xt't� ,.,•. ,5q, :sk4`'" ,,.. 3w� .0 � �x , ,.:.,, k- v a:,,. : ,�a..: .... . .: s. ..,. . m , c
„ � .. r3` " r , ,tq
,y' a ,<. .,. n .E-.ani ,<. ..:2�'a- ;:. § ^a5 '.:,R✓""">4' nzy. xv-... z-f a e ;4, .,; a . .. < . ,
. :.... . .; , -a a^v .;p . -n3T* , °"v F • k ? :
}i # Id
j x
•; .a „'ts ,ntu` ,ry. y,� �rs' a#ss�, z :�' L • e . a,. .s r c+t.< 9 x F. _ f gy"` '.��ee f'
,� .t*�"< „k;� � • fi''"�Pk �"rr>�s�'. . ,a.:. . ,� , . .r., �' , ^• '�_. .�"�;..�-;��'�� ... ..�^'>�i ,.��3€, �� . ,, ,
r," t '*,y ' , ., . t OWNSNOW
him that he would be getting sewer lines . He understood what happened was that the sewer
line proceeded north on the east side of US 1 , and somewhere around Hobart Road detoured
across and went to the wastewater plant and did not come by his property but went closer to
the Graves Brothers plant . He kept "hounding” Mr . Pinto and asked for his money back ; Mr .
Pinto agreed to return his money without interest and the base facility charge . Mr . Gaudet
agreed to wait another two years . He enumerated the dollars he had invested in ERU ' s as
the years went by . Mr . Pinto offered to sell his ERU ' s but stressed the County would never
give the interest back nor the base facility charges . Mr . Pinto needed 51 % of the proposed
amount of money to get the sewer project started " and he did a great job selling " . Finally,
in 1996 , he thought the County had about $ 28 , 000 of his money , but he added it up and it
came out to about $48 , 000 for which he had received nothing but " a pile of cardboard
receipts . " He went back again and learned of the prohibitions ( crossing US 1 and crossing
the railroad tracks ) for getting lines to both of his mobile home parks . Mr . Pinto suggested
that Mr . Gaudet and his neighbors get together and pay for the connection to the closest line .
He could not afford to do it on his own and there were not enough others in the area to join
with him . Mr . Pinto said he would see what he could do ; he was very good about putting
Mr . Gaudet off. Mr . Gaudet then read into the record a letter he wrote in 1996 to the Press
Journal (but did not send) concerning his encounters
with the various departments of Indian
River County , with a chronological account of his dealings with the Utilities Department and
Mr . Pinto .
In response to Commissioner Adams wanting know Mr . Gaudet ' s " bottom line " , Mr .
Gaudet advised that he was looking for the other half of his base facility charges . He stated
the County could keep the $ 15 , 000 . The County had bought back his ERU ' s for $ 28 , 350 and
will be able to resell them . The County will "pick up " $ 45 , 000 if they " give him $ 15 , 000 " .
In 1996 , another Utilities Department employee , Robby Wiseman , agreed to put in a $ 90 , 000
i "
January 23 , 2001
64
BK } 1 y PG 050
t y
R ry :rii ,z �' �"•'`-�: .;; xa3�"� p" �.'^�u"�.;.ar.-v -r `t,�Fn"''y.i..?.S.a'. <kt.'' .>u�a l.u'9r"=. ,++✓{a3'.1vrsw',,.�^ ib,�2y;.x'+Yi-:- + u�a4,e.r�
�n.`*..., sr . . 1 .x, ;, �.'' �. . e e Y x x*rt, .v-";;""
. a } t a '
r Ii
`k rti ti1F
} d-Y x,,,. -A✓ dt` (X � ^� .. v < t =.; A^ 'i . .' •'" . . .. : .t '_: .:: r : , 2.t.:5
'. a .'" .YaS nsb _..` ^ n *rs (Y <1,...,,.
P S� .` }�.."» 'i} s � " •F fir*-'fi, s<, �G�^r �x"[" e 3';�;vfi^• `L° ' k. � yr�ns. �fi. "i+ ".-.. s 3�n, S: - f.>
< �. t r
in < »• a' it.,s x +. w k. ^"ir, , ..§.s'»• ++,R {yts !. z � c. S1 <, e'- «4 >, x r a ,# ra x t t
rZ 3 » r; s k z , ..rf sn. ..
i"Y g s : ;t, c °i •` R ,',Y*irr2 Ly, i �4'?p } .i;}7^�` . t s,»s:';: k '2 M1 y ,:i r ,/, i a
x a ` 'a f " ,�.F>~ 'v 5 r nf.:,
.'• v. . k' lF 9<.e 4* } "!P .. h". rk.. L I rh 'h & i'.u�*Sc _ y't6 N' Y' £i=.;'; �" % „ .. 4 n " h,
' ! rk ..:♦ r hk J "? ^' k n $»iX
NK'
.x< � .».$ .a'" � :� 4� -kf s x x� :# p ? �r.� � � a +n .y�.y y{ ax �,. .w •rxw'? . � .. . tL � r v ..'�, ✓. ,.�
t t ^.� �, a 'x-, tea.# 1 v, k
. .. . ,.<.
s T ,z*
a : ... - :}.. . ~Y •v ax .t, £ S v p•v s'- i,# .. ,, , r . .. .::. J # r wd.... rn
S-, I'V
.r, Vf' t x '�%. � � #+i a:.)�a
d arA ,:. h �. •. :.v. � .: . . f .. ... ., 1# .35 M1 . r . , 3 � Y ... ... , f
m : . x �. -•t }z xy; f. ,:t . y .�;' r w s
,
a
x , ,. .. . .., � .xt't� ,.,•. ,5q, :sk4`'" ,,.. 3w� .0 � �x , ,.:.,, k- v a:,,. : ,�a..: .... . .: s. ..,. . m , c
„ � .. r3` " r , ,tq
,y' a ,<. .,. n .E-.ani ,<. ..:2�'a- ;:. § ^a5 '.:,R✓""">4' nzy. xv-... z-f a e ;4, .,; a . .. < . ,
. :.... . .; , -a a^v .;p . -n3T* , °"v F • k ? :
}i # Id
j x
•; .a „'ts ,ntu` ,ry. y,� �rs' a#ss�, z :�' L • e . a,. .s r c+t.< 9 x F. _ f gy"` '.��ee f'
,� .t*�"< „k;� � • fi''"�Pk �"rr>�s�'. . ,a.:. . ,� , . .r., �' , ^• '�_. .�"�;..�-;��'�� ... ..�^'>�i ,.��3€, �� . ,, ,
r," t '*,y ' , ., . t OWNSNOW
him that he would be getting sewer lines . He understood what happened was that the sewer
line proceeded north on the east side of US 1 , and somewhere around Hobart Road detoured
across and went to the wastewater plant and did not come by his property but went closer to
the Graves Brothers plant . He kept "hounding” Mr . Pinto and asked for his money back ; Mr .
Pinto agreed to return his money without interest and the base facility charge . Mr . Gaudet
agreed to wait another two years . He enumerated the dollars he had invested in ERU ' s as
the years went by . Mr . Pinto offered to sell his ERU ' s but stressed the County would never
give the interest back nor the base facility charges . Mr . Pinto needed 51 % of the proposed
amount of money to get the sewer project started " and he did a great job selling " . Finally,
in 1996 , he thought the County had about $ 28 , 000 of his money , but he added it up and it
came out to about $48 , 000 for which he had received nothing but " a pile of cardboard
receipts . " He went back again and learned of the prohibitions ( crossing US 1 and crossing
the railroad tracks ) for getting lines to both of his mobile home parks . Mr . Pinto suggested
that Mr . Gaudet and his neighbors get together and pay for the connection to the closest line .
He could not afford to do it on his own and there were not enough others in the area to join
with him . Mr . Pinto said he would see what he could do ; he was very good about putting
Mr . Gaudet off. Mr . Gaudet then read into the record a letter he wrote in 1996 to the Press
Journal (but did not send) concerning his encounters
with the various departments of Indian
River County , with a chronological account of his dealings with the Utilities Department and
Mr . Pinto .
In response to Commissioner Adams wanting know Mr . Gaudet ' s " bottom line " , Mr .
Gaudet advised that he was looking for the other half of his base facility charges . He stated
the County could keep the $ 15 , 000 . The County had bought back his ERU ' s for $ 28 , 350 and
will be able to resell them . The County will "pick up " $ 45 , 000 if they " give him $ 15 , 000 " .
In 1996 , another Utilities Department employee , Robby Wiseman , agreed to put in a $ 90 , 000
i "
January 23 , 2001
64
BK } 1 y PG 050
t y
R ry :rii ,z �' �"•'`-�: .;; xa3�"� p" �.'^�u"�.;.ar.-v -r `t,�Fn"''y.i..?.S.a'. <kt.'' .>u�a l.u'9r"=. ,++✓{a3'.1vrsw',,.�^ ib,�2y;.x'+Yi-:- + u�a4,e.r�
�n.`*..., sr . . 1 .x, ;, �.'' �. . e e Y x x*rt, .v-";;""
. a } t a '
r Ii
`k rti ti1F
} d-Y x,,,. -A✓ dt` (X � ^� .. v < t =.; A^ 'i . .' •'" . . .. : .t '_: .:: r : , 2.t.:5
'. a .'" .YaS nsb _..` ^ n *rs (Y <1,...,,.
P S� .` }�.."» 'i} s � " •F fir*-'fi, s<, �G�^r �x"[" e 3';�;vfi^• `L° ' k. � yr�ns. �fi. "i+ ".-.. s 3�n, S: - f.>
< �. t r
in < »• a' it.,s x +. w k. ^"ir, , ..§.s'»• ++,R {yts !. z � c. S1 <, e'- «4 >, x r a ,# ra x t t
rZ 3 » r; s k z , ..rf sn. ..
i"Y g s : ;t, c °i •` R ,',Y*irr2 Ly, i �4'?p } .i;}7^�` . t s,»s:';: k '2 M1 y ,:i r ,/, i a
x a ` 'a f " ,�.F>~ 'v 5 r nf.:,
.'• v. . k' lF 9<.e 4* } "!P .. h". rk.. L I rh 'h & i'.u�*Sc _ y't6 N' Y' £i=.;'; �" % „ .. 4 n " h,
' ! rk ..:♦ r hk J "? ^' k n $»iX
NK'
.x< � .».$ .a'" � :� 4� -kf s x x� :# p ? �r.� � � a +n .y�.y y{ ax �,. .w •rxw'? . � .. . tL � r v ..'�, ✓. ,.�
t t ^.� �, a 'x-, tea.# 1 v, k
. .. . ,.<.
Imi' -^ Y y r f , c - i z r':: 'A i 4 `6' r.. r ; r
Y ` "f v� «" i A, .. .✓ n.x. z' *, ,Y � �' , s+ , .s s
sl.y,I
-,K C
&f .
r
a 'le
�
✓ ~,„31
3 n , 'es ayiy
it
''Y'S .. ..id ,*R' b "°P .,, a. . . s -a:... .-" Fi .. ° ' . + ,. _ . .v, - . . , �. . . , .. . .. .
. , r � ra?�"'.'�n. . z . .` r„ � +"h `;�-r.,£ * r 4+• . 5
IJ I
lift station at both of Mr . Gaudet ' s mobile home parks and hook up . He was going to also
supply sewer service to other areas . Mr . Gaudet signed the contract and sent it back , but in
1997 he had some problems and was unable to perform his part of the contract . In 1998 he
learned that both Mr . Pinto and Mr . Wiseman were no longer with the County and he had
to start over, but personal health matters came first . He met with Mr . Hubbs , a " gentleman ' s
gentleman " without an appointment . He then met with Messrs . Hubbs , Doyle and Chastain
and advised of wanting his money back or having the sewer lines . Mr . Doyle advised later
that there were no plans to put sewers in front of either mobile home park . Mr . Gaudet then
asked for his $ 76 , 741 . 81 back . Mr . Doyle tried to persuade him to change his sewer ERU ' s
for water ERU ' s . It was a good try , but would have been an uneven exchange moneywise .
Rumors of a new Publix nearby circulated and Mr . Gaudet thought that might get him his
sewer line , but the Publix was built elsewhere . He went back to Mr . Hubbs who stated Mr .
Gaudet would have to request a full refund in writing , which he did in April . Mr . Gaudet
had paid the interest for the period of 10 years and payment was complete . There is a
difference of a few hundred dollars between his figures ( out - of-pocket ) and the County ' s
figures which did not include late charges , billing fees , or franchise fees . Mr . Hubbs then
turned Mr . Gaudet over to Deputy County Attorney Will Collins who was a nice man ,
sympathetic to his situation , but Mr . Collins told him he would "never be whole " on it . He
understood and asked what could be done . He was reimbursed $ 28 , 350 for the ERU ' s .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED
BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge , to award Mr . Gaudet $ 15 , 830 . 20
(the other half of the franchise fee and the other half of the base
facility charge . )
Mr . Gaudet replied, "Fine , keep the interest . "
January 23 , 2001
65
BKE Pr. 8S !
*
,
5 ? p >^r`•, + (i'455,flkrt "ne $' § S''+N '"' 4.. ,r '.. : .." " k #i" E ±3 x jr '= a 5 5 ..3
t " t, 5 x
'. *, 3Ydi wt a ac '"r+. x < C;G, •t5 s.. r .?', a}a , ,Z 5 . s
,'Ca
S7 >i„ka '"ry-v ai>y ,„��"s^[ ee' ,��a�9 "'"%��`•. ,, , ra. ., t� k” @ °", e. . . r1 r . .yk s.e . ti F <
:y j;.., x S / sw+ a x "3.°
le,
Imi' -^ Y y r f , c - i z r':: 'A i 4 `6' r.. r ; r
Y ` "f v� «" i A, .. .✓ n.x. z' *, ,Y � �' , s+ , .s s
sl.y,I
-,K C
&f .
r
a 'le
�
✓ ~,„31
3 n , 'es ayiy
it
''Y'S .. ..id ,*R' b "°P .,, a. . . s -a:... .-" Fi .. ° ' . + ,. _ . .v, - . . , �. . . , .. . .. .
. , r � ra?�"'.'�n. . z . .` r„ � +"h `;�-r.,£ * r 4+• . 5
IJ I
lift station at both of Mr . Gaudet ' s mobile home parks and hook up . He was going to also
supply sewer service to other areas . Mr . Gaudet signed the contract and sent it back , but in
1997 he had some problems and was unable to perform his part of the contract . In 1998 he
learned that both Mr . Pinto and Mr . Wiseman were no longer with the County and he had
to start over, but personal health matters came first . He met with Mr . Hubbs , a " gentleman ' s
gentleman " without an appointment . He then met with Messrs . Hubbs , Doyle and Chastain
and advised of wanting his money back or having the sewer lines . Mr . Doyle advised later
that there were no plans to put sewers in front of either mobile home park . Mr . Gaudet then
asked for his $ 76 , 741 . 81 back . Mr . Doyle tried to persuade him to change his sewer ERU ' s
for water ERU ' s . It was a good try , but would have been an uneven exchange moneywise .
Rumors of a new Publix nearby circulated and Mr . Gaudet thought that might get him his
sewer line , but the Publix was built elsewhere . He went back to Mr . Hubbs who stated Mr .
Gaudet would have to request a full refund in writing , which he did in April . Mr . Gaudet
had paid the interest for the period of 10 years and payment was complete . There is a
difference of a few hundred dollars between his figures ( out - of-pocket ) and the County ' s
figures which did not include late charges , billing fees , or franchise fees . Mr . Hubbs then
turned Mr . Gaudet over to Deputy County Attorney Will Collins who was a nice man ,
sympathetic to his situation , but Mr . Collins told him he would "never be whole " on it . He
understood and asked what could be done . He was reimbursed $ 28 , 350 for the ERU ' s .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED
BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge , to award Mr . Gaudet $ 15 , 830 . 20
(the other half of the franchise fee and the other half of the base
facility charge . )
Mr . Gaudet replied, "Fine , keep the interest . "
January 23 , 2001
65
BKE Pr. 8S !
*
,
5 ? p >^r`•, + (i'455,flkrt "ne $' § S''+N '"' 4.. ,r '.. : .." " k #i" E ±3 x jr '= a 5 5 ..3
t " t, 5 x
'. *, 3Ydi wt a ac '"r+. x < C;G, •t5 s.. r .?', a}a , ,Z 5 . s
,'Ca
S7 >i„ka '"ry-v ai>y ,„��"s^[ ee' ,��a�9 "'"%��`•. ,, , ra. ., t� k” @ °", e. . . r1 r . .yk s.e . ti F <
:y j;.., x S / sw+ a x "3.°
le,
"k k, "'
f
i
B
Mr . Baird pointed out that Indian River County Code 201 . 08 was what staff had to
live by and why staff refunded what they did .
Commissioner Macht asked if it was fair to say that the possibility of sewers being
made available to Mr . Gaudet was so remote that the County has no business tying up his
funds at this time , and Mr . Baird responded that according to 201 . 08 the County could have
charged a lot less .
It seemed to Chairman Ginn that a lot of misinformation had been conveyed over the
years to Mr . Gaudet . She called it "outrageous . "
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously .
Mr . Gaudet thanked the Board . He felt the County was fortunate to have Mr . Hubbs
who had responded to his request with skill and compassion while never jeopardizing his
position with the County . He had the same admiration for Mr . Collins and all the secretaries
in the office .
11 . A . CRC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ( CARLTON RIVER
CLUB ) - REQUEST TO PAVE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD SOUTH
OF JUNGLE TRAIL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 16 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Robert M . Keating. AIC
Community Development Direc�(/
FROM : Roland M . DeBio , CP
Chief, Environmental Planning
January 23 , 2001
D 66
G J 2
sL: '. ta
re t �1 ¢ „�v sv��'*�`£ 44`.. ? 42 � .v,¢ i ?. .cj,"N<;,yn k `ti rt'a, 's'sS k3• n t r }
iji
In
;'.. s i.,� T iS.a'e _-y" `'.'s i�"w F z 's'{"g 4 r" `✓n 3� .�, S. s r L
'Alf .. . , �.
"k k, "'
f
i
B
Mr . Baird pointed out that Indian River County Code 201 . 08 was what staff had to
live by and why staff refunded what they did .
Commissioner Macht asked if it was fair to say that the possibility of sewers being
made available to Mr . Gaudet was so remote that the County has no business tying up his
funds at this time , and Mr . Baird responded that according to 201 . 08 the County could have
charged a lot less .
It seemed to Chairman Ginn that a lot of misinformation had been conveyed over the
years to Mr . Gaudet . She called it "outrageous . "
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously .
Mr . Gaudet thanked the Board . He felt the County was fortunate to have Mr . Hubbs
who had responded to his request with skill and compassion while never jeopardizing his
position with the County . He had the same admiration for Mr . Collins and all the secretaries
in the office .
11 . A . CRC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ( CARLTON RIVER
CLUB ) - REQUEST TO PAVE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD SOUTH
OF JUNGLE TRAIL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 16 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE :
Robert M . Keating. AIC
Community Development Direc�(/
FROM : Roland M . DeBio , CP
Chief, Environmental Planning
January 23 , 2001
D 66
G J 2
sL: '. ta
re t �1 ¢ „�v sv��'*�`£ 44`.. ? 42 � .v,¢ i ?. .cj,"N<;,yn k `ti rt'a, 's'sS k3• n t r }
iji
In
;'.. s i.,� T iS.a'e _-y" `'.'s i�"w F z 's'{"g 4 r" `✓n 3� .�, S. s r L
'Alf .. . , �.
y Y 4y ym ^h`kt t amu ' I*, £ k, +`•. k k i'V "5 j ` Y ;:.� i
t
77
gz
cllt-
* t ,
T , .: p*� �.
,�a, frit wl
DATE : January 16 , 2001
RE : Board Consideration of CRC Development Company ' s Request to Pave 01d Winter
Beach Road South of Jungle Trail
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AISM CONDITIONS
Background
The Carlton River Club is a planned residential development (PD) proposed at the south end of Jungle
Trial in the Town of Indian River Shores . The proposed development fronts Jungle Trail . and includes
both sides of Old Winter Beach Road (barrier island portion ) leading to the old bridge head ( "bridge
tender ' s site ") . The right-of-way of Old Winter Beach is owned by Indian River County, as is the bridge
tender ' s site at the road ' s terminus .
The developer of the proposed Carlton River Club is Mason Simpson, President of CRC Development
Company. The engineering firm for the project is Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc . On April 20, 2000,
Knight, McGuire & Associates applied to the County Public Works Department for a right-of-way
permit to pave Old Winter Beach Road for access to the south portion of the planned Carlton River Club . -_
However, since Old Winter Beach Road is designated a "scenic and historic road . " county staff advised
the applicant that the proposed road paving would need to be reviewed by the Historic Resources
Advisory Committee (HRAC) and approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to county
staffs issuance of a right-of-way permit. The HRAC considered the matter on June 8 . 2000 , and ae'ain on
December 14 . 2000 (see attached HRAC minutes ) . This matter is now being presented to the Board of
County Commissioners for consideration .
HRAC Recommendation
At its meeting on June 8 . 2000 . the HRAC voted 3 -0 to recommend that the Board of Counn,
Commissioners allow the road paving , but with the following conditions :
• that the bridge tender ' s site remain in public ownership at its historic location ;
• that public access to the bridge tender ' s site remain unrestricted; and
• that the roadway improvements be the minimum necessary to meet the developer ' s
access needs , as well as be designed to be the most historically compatible in meeting
those needs .
Further, staff had concerns at that time about the intersection of Old Winter Beach Road and Jungle Trail
from a traffic safety viewpoint.
To address points raised at the June 8 , 2000 HRAC meeting, the developer redesigned the proposed
paving plan . On December 14, 2000, the HRAC reviewed revised engineering drawings . At that meeting,
the HRAC voted 3 -0 to recommend against approval of the revised design, based on the opinion that the
revised plan did not minimize improvements and could be better designed to be more historically
compatible ( see attached minutes) . More specifically, the HRAC did not want the road to have a typical
profile of a subdivision road fronting residential lawns . The HRAC also questioned the need of a
sidewalk since it conflicts with the intent to minimize the width of the roadway improvement.
Latest Revised Plan Based on EIRAC Concerns
The developer has again revised the Old Winter Beach Road paving design to address the issues raised at
the December 14, 2000 HRAC meeting. The latest revisions are summarized as follows :
January 23 , 2001
67
BK N353
,
7 t
+ + ` `� Ts " � a ° b °'� "w' ' h"I3 i zt 1 ,1 r I j r t Y Ixv Y , ,y '{.t j
.: I { ( t
. . . .. a
y Y 4y ym ^h`kt t amu ' I*, £ k, +`•. k k i'V "5 j ` Y ;:.� i
t
77
gz
cllt-
* t ,
T , .: p*� �.
,�a, frit wl
DATE : January 16 , 2001
RE : Board Consideration of CRC Development Company ' s Request to Pave 01d Winter
Beach Road South of Jungle Trail
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its meeting of January 23 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AISM CONDITIONS
Background
The Carlton River Club is a planned residential development (PD) proposed at the south end of Jungle
Trial in the Town of Indian River Shores . The proposed development fronts Jungle Trail . and includes
both sides of Old Winter Beach Road (barrier island portion ) leading to the old bridge head ( "bridge
tender ' s site ") . The right-of-way of Old Winter Beach is owned by Indian River County, as is the bridge
tender ' s site at the road ' s terminus .
The developer of the proposed Carlton River Club is Mason Simpson, President of CRC Development
Company. The engineering firm for the project is Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc . On April 20, 2000,
Knight, McGuire & Associates applied to the County Public Works Department for a right-of-way
permit to pave Old Winter Beach Road for access to the south portion of the planned Carlton River Club . -_
However, since Old Winter Beach Road is designated a "scenic and historic road . " county staff advised
the applicant that the proposed road paving would need to be reviewed by the Historic Resources
Advisory Committee (HRAC) and approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to county
staffs issuance of a right-of-way permit. The HRAC considered the matter on June 8 . 2000 , and ae'ain on
December 14 . 2000 (see attached HRAC minutes ) . This matter is now being presented to the Board of
County Commissioners for consideration .
HRAC Recommendation
At its meeting on June 8 . 2000 . the HRAC voted 3 -0 to recommend that the Board of Counn,
Commissioners allow the road paving , but with the following conditions :
• that the bridge tender ' s site remain in public ownership at its historic location ;
• that public access to the bridge tender ' s site remain unrestricted; and
• that the roadway improvements be the minimum necessary to meet the developer ' s
access needs , as well as be designed to be the most historically compatible in meeting
those needs .
Further, staff had concerns at that time about the intersection of Old Winter Beach Road and Jungle Trail
from a traffic safety viewpoint.
To address points raised at the June 8 , 2000 HRAC meeting, the developer redesigned the proposed
paving plan . On December 14, 2000, the HRAC reviewed revised engineering drawings . At that meeting,
the HRAC voted 3 -0 to recommend against approval of the revised design, based on the opinion that the
revised plan did not minimize improvements and could be better designed to be more historically
compatible ( see attached minutes) . More specifically, the HRAC did not want the road to have a typical
profile of a subdivision road fronting residential lawns . The HRAC also questioned the need of a
sidewalk since it conflicts with the intent to minimize the width of the roadway improvement.
Latest Revised Plan Based on EIRAC Concerns
The developer has again revised the Old Winter Beach Road paving design to address the issues raised at
the December 14, 2000 HRAC meeting. The latest revisions are summarized as follows :
January 23 , 2001
67
BK N353
,
7 t
+ + ` `� Ts " � a ° b °'� "w' ' h"I3 i zt 1 ,1 r I j r t Y Ixv Y , ,y '{.t j
.: I { ( t
. . . .. a
X,
r , .,.' Y 3 sm r�m�u'�ai�' �� ` wR � a'^=;„tee•` "}''� -�s��' ^< n a���r�� � s � , � s
� . 'moi Y s' .e , � a
c,,:: , r . ... z r,,..,o ..� �y ' . .An <� z . . "Fc .. fn+F r,ui=i3 1 «. ex2,..' r3
.�5.�,... ,.�. • ,N � S k ”. ..� aC . °it�.'xs 3" +%� ,....� d. x *.,'S"^x. x:�
�,�T.`�rs '� °'rt:°,r{�f°.. #tn,'3"' tw a ' � ";?y :s^ Yx-' �l +s�. F � '`�`�pw�,�
a; a
• the sidewalk has been eliminated;
• the road profile width has been minimized to the extent practicable while still accounting
for vehicular access , safety and stormwater management;
• fill volume and elevation has been reduced; and
• a native vegetation buffer has been added between the proposed road and future
residences .
ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan & Land Development Regulations
Regarding scenic and historic roads, Comprehensive Plan Recreation and Open Space Policy 8 . 3 states
that:
" These [scenic/historic]- roads will be used as access ways, open space, and corridors
incorporating passive and active recreational activities while maintaining their primary
historical importance. "
Section 933 . 08 (4) of the County Historic and Archaeological Resources Protection Ordinance reads as
follows :
"( 4 ) Management and protection of scenic or historic roads. The public works department of Indian River
County. the parks department and the community development department shall implement guidelines for
maintenance of the scenic and historic roads . The following guidelines apply to all scenic and historic
roads :
( a) Clear cutting of vegetation in the protected area of any scenic or historic road shall be prohibited,
except under circumstances where sight lines are obstructed and contribute to traffic hazards ;
(b) The cutting of selective vegetation within the protected area shall be allowed upon the
recommendation of the community development department and approval of the county planning
and zoning commission;
( c ) The establishment of planting strips within the protected area to be comprised of native vegetation
shall be allowed upon approval of the community development director;
(d) Improvements for providing adequate drainage for the roadbed and surrounding properties , and a
program of maintenance to ensure the continued effectiveness of the systems may be established;
(e) The selective removal of trees and other vegetation from the protected area shall be allowed when
such are damaged bevond restoration. In all cases, all such activity will comply with the Indian
River County Tree Protection Chapter;
(f) Individual management plans for scenic and historic roadways may set additional restrictions or
requirements for these roadways :
1 . The additional considerations of Resolution No . 89- 39 "Jungle Trail Management Plan"
shall be applied to all projects. zonings, uses, and other activities in the vicinity of the
historic roadway of Jungle Trail. "
As described in Recreation and Open Policy 8 . 3 , Old Winter Beach Road, like other designated scenic
and historic roads, is to be used as an access way for recreation , while maintaining the roadway ' s
"primary historic importance . " Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor County land development
regulations explicitly prohibit the paving of Old Winter Beach Road, provided that public access and
"historic importance" are maintained .
The question facing the County is whether paving of Old Winter Beach Road under the revised design
would be detrimental to the scenic and historic character of the roadway . That issue must be weighed _
with other factors, including :
January 23 , 2001
68
PG 8 5 4
s' ✓ �,s 'tk ^ .t ^ �nwE + tERnt s y �' � j` ,< � F < a , t s Y
V
X,
r , .,.' Y 3 sm r�m�u'�ai�' �� ` wR � a'^=;„tee•` "}''� -�s��' ^< n a���r�� � s � , � s
� . 'moi Y s' .e , � a
c,,:: , r . ... z r,,..,o ..� �y ' . .An <� z . . "Fc .. fn+F r,ui=i3 1 «. ex2,..' r3
.�5.�,... ,.�. • ,N � S k ”. ..� aC . °it�.'xs 3" +%� ,....� d. x *.,'S"^x. x:�
�,�T.`�rs '� °'rt:°,r{�f°.. #tn,'3"' tw a ' � ";?y :s^ Yx-' �l +s�. F � '`�`�pw�,�
a; a
• the sidewalk has been eliminated;
• the road profile width has been minimized to the extent practicable while still accounting
for vehicular access , safety and stormwater management;
• fill volume and elevation has been reduced; and
• a native vegetation buffer has been added between the proposed road and future
residences .
ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan & Land Development Regulations
Regarding scenic and historic roads, Comprehensive Plan Recreation and Open Space Policy 8 . 3 states
that:
" These [scenic/historic]- roads will be used as access ways, open space, and corridors
incorporating passive and active recreational activities while maintaining their primary
historical importance. "
Section 933 . 08 (4) of the County Historic and Archaeological Resources Protection Ordinance reads as
follows :
"( 4 ) Management and protection of scenic or historic roads. The public works department of Indian River
County. the parks department and the community development department shall implement guidelines for
maintenance of the scenic and historic roads . The following guidelines apply to all scenic and historic
roads :
( a) Clear cutting of vegetation in the protected area of any scenic or historic road shall be prohibited,
except under circumstances where sight lines are obstructed and contribute to traffic hazards ;
(b) The cutting of selective vegetation within the protected area shall be allowed upon the
recommendation of the community development department and approval of the county planning
and zoning commission;
( c ) The establishment of planting strips within the protected area to be comprised of native vegetation
shall be allowed upon approval of the community development director;
(d) Improvements for providing adequate drainage for the roadbed and surrounding properties , and a
program of maintenance to ensure the continued effectiveness of the systems may be established;
(e) The selective removal of trees and other vegetation from the protected area shall be allowed when
such are damaged bevond restoration. In all cases, all such activity will comply with the Indian
River County Tree Protection Chapter;
(f) Individual management plans for scenic and historic roadways may set additional restrictions or
requirements for these roadways :
1 . The additional considerations of Resolution No . 89- 39 "Jungle Trail Management Plan"
shall be applied to all projects. zonings, uses, and other activities in the vicinity of the
historic roadway of Jungle Trail. "
As described in Recreation and Open Policy 8 . 3 , Old Winter Beach Road, like other designated scenic
and historic roads, is to be used as an access way for recreation , while maintaining the roadway ' s
"primary historic importance . " Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor County land development
regulations explicitly prohibit the paving of Old Winter Beach Road, provided that public access and
"historic importance" are maintained .
The question facing the County is whether paving of Old Winter Beach Road under the revised design
would be detrimental to the scenic and historic character of the roadway . That issue must be weighed _
with other factors, including :
January 23 , 2001
68
PG 8 5 4
s' ✓ �,s 'tk ^ .t ^ �nwE + tERnt s y �' � j` ,< � F < a , t s Y
V
a
sx T f z
,
yy � s2 2
. .. .. , .. .� . .,c..Y,. ,*. «�, : . .3".. x3, - ,- 1 +y^': e ,:'xY+ ,.> eu+ .... ,? t a 'o. . . "r . .
.. . .rG $ ..�..t - rr-•-: } ,. a :f. . `. ,,,. ;- i'::
• the current travelway is unimproved and sporadically inaccessible due to flooding ;
• a portion of the current travelway , as shown on a survey of the road right-of-way, is outside of the
nght-of-wav and on the developer ' s private property ;
• the road improvement as proposed would improve public access to the bridge tender ' s site ;
• the developer is proposing to construct a historic bndge head monument in the road cul -de- sac ;
and
• the developer has a legal right to access his property from Old Winter Beach Road. assuming no
other reasonable access is available .
If the County does not allow the proposed improvements , the developer could consider establishing his
own access drive outside of the Old Winter Beach Road right-of-way . Staff thinks it is a better option to
allow the road improvement, with the condition that public access to the bridge tender ' s site is
unrestricted.
County Code Subsection 933 . 08 (4)(d) allows road improvements "for providing adequate drainage for
the roadbed and surrounding properties . " Notwithstanding, four of the six guidelines in County Code
Section 933 . 08 (4), relating to scenic and historic roads , emphasize the protection of existing native
vegetation or call for the planting of vegetated buffer strips .
The HRAC has scrutinized and recommended against earlier designs of the proposed road paving project
in the interest of minimizing adverse impacts to the scenic and historic character of the road. Staff' s
position is that the latest revised design substantially addresses HRAC ' s concerns and minimizes impacts
while still meeting basic engineering needs from the standpoint of vehicular access and stormwater
management. Nevertheless, staff thinks that there needs to be added emphasis on the protection of
existing native vegetation, via a County condition that the proposed roadway alignment be "micro-sited"
within the 70' nght-of-way to maximize protection of existing native vegetation and wetlands. Moreover,
the proposed vegetated buffer should at minimum meet the planting standards that apply to the Jungle
Trail buffer.
RECOMMFNDATTON
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the (latest revised) proposed
improvements to Old Winter Beach Road, and direct staff to issue a County Right-of-Way Permit for the
work, with the following conditions :
1 . The bridge tender ' s site will remain in public ownership at its historic location.
2 . Public access to the bridge tender ' s site will remain unrestricted .
3 . The roadway alignment will be micro- sited within the 70' wide right-of--way to maximize the
protection of existing native vegetation and wetlands .
4 . The 10 ' wide vegetated buffer will meet the planting standards applied to the Jungle trail buffer .
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Location map/survey of existing conditions
2 . Improvement plan and cross-section detail -
3 . Excepts from 06/08/00 and 12/ 14/00 HRAC meeting minutes
4 . Applicant presentation packet ( on file in Commision Ofc . ) _
APPROVED :
'n°' v R'•r C , Accroveo Daue
FOR: .iannnry 73 001
B if
1711
F:\Commoony peveb{anent\UsersVtOLANDWRAC1Cuhonnvcib BCCnem.wpd
tiiSN Mq; ,
January 23 , 2001
69
K r'G 855
77 ,
J" 3 <t 1
_s4 > 1 } } 1 Fy n.' 3 7", 79,R1FRFT11 11
u
'A
z�F�.,a. �,
a
sx T f z
,
yy � s2 2
. .. .. , .. .� . .,c..Y,. ,*. «�, : . .3".. x3, - ,- 1 +y^': e ,:'xY+ ,.> eu+ .... ,? t a 'o. . . "r . .
.. . .rG $ ..�..t - rr-•-: } ,. a :f. . `. ,,,. ;- i'::
• the current travelway is unimproved and sporadically inaccessible due to flooding ;
• a portion of the current travelway , as shown on a survey of the road right-of-way, is outside of the
nght-of-wav and on the developer ' s private property ;
• the road improvement as proposed would improve public access to the bridge tender ' s site ;
• the developer is proposing to construct a historic bndge head monument in the road cul -de- sac ;
and
• the developer has a legal right to access his property from Old Winter Beach Road. assuming no
other reasonable access is available .
If the County does not allow the proposed improvements , the developer could consider establishing his
own access drive outside of the Old Winter Beach Road right-of-way . Staff thinks it is a better option to
allow the road improvement, with the condition that public access to the bridge tender ' s site is
unrestricted.
County Code Subsection 933 . 08 (4)(d) allows road improvements "for providing adequate drainage for
the roadbed and surrounding properties . " Notwithstanding, four of the six guidelines in County Code
Section 933 . 08 (4), relating to scenic and historic roads , emphasize the protection of existing native
vegetation or call for the planting of vegetated buffer strips .
The HRAC has scrutinized and recommended against earlier designs of the proposed road paving project
in the interest of minimizing adverse impacts to the scenic and historic character of the road. Staff' s
position is that the latest revised design substantially addresses HRAC ' s concerns and minimizes impacts
while still meeting basic engineering needs from the standpoint of vehicular access and stormwater
management. Nevertheless, staff thinks that there needs to be added emphasis on the protection of
existing native vegetation, via a County condition that the proposed roadway alignment be "micro-sited"
within the 70' nght-of-way to maximize protection of existing native vegetation and wetlands. Moreover,
the proposed vegetated buffer should at minimum meet the planting standards that apply to the Jungle
Trail buffer.
RECOMMFNDATTON
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the (latest revised) proposed
improvements to Old Winter Beach Road, and direct staff to issue a County Right-of-Way Permit for the
work, with the following conditions :
1 . The bridge tender ' s site will remain in public ownership at its historic location.
2 . Public access to the bridge tender ' s site will remain unrestricted .
3 . The roadway alignment will be micro- sited within the 70' wide right-of--way to maximize the
protection of existing native vegetation and wetlands .
4 . The 10 ' wide vegetated buffer will meet the planting standards applied to the Jungle trail buffer .
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Location map/survey of existing conditions
2 . Improvement plan and cross-section detail -
3 . Excepts from 06/08/00 and 12/ 14/00 HRAC meeting minutes
4 . Applicant presentation packet ( on file in Commision Ofc . ) _
APPROVED :
'n°' v R'•r C , Accroveo Daue
FOR: .iannnry 73 001
B if
1711
F:\Commoony peveb{anent\UsersVtOLANDWRAC1Cuhonnvcib BCCnem.wpd
tiiSN Mq; ,
January 23 , 2001
69
K r'G 855
77 ,
J" 3 <t 1
_s4 > 1 } } 1 Fy n.' 3 7", 79,R1FRFT11 11
u
'A
z�F�.,a. �,
3 ' , 1 1
71F71l ni
a L 4 k . 1 f •t t X; } l i
, .. y„ . t; .^ti�-Prgw&t .ar ?z,. l . ' r ,a.
, :ice W r
!s i
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED
for discussion by Vice Chairman Stanbridge to approve staff' s
recommendation .
Under discussion , Vice Chainnan Stanbridge thought this revision should be brought
back to the Historic Resources Advisory Committee . She also wanted to clarify that the
report given by the developer had some very glaring errors in it . The time frame referred to
as a " delay " was not on the part of the HRAC or the County . The information was not
furnished on a timely basis to make the necessary decisions . She mentioned as an example ,
that at the first meeting it was discovered that there was a crossroad on Jungle Trail that was
a traffic hazard . Public Works Director James W . Davis spent a number of months working
with the developer on correcting that .
Chairman Ginn asked if Vice Chairman Stanbridge wanted the matter sent back to the
HRAC .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge had questions concerning the micro - siting of the project
which is better than the first plan which clear cut 70 feet of the County ' s right- of-way . That
plan also had two sidewalks and other strange things on an historical road that was never
wider than 12 or 18 feet . She understood it was necessary to comply with code , but this was
extreme . If the committee members could see this revised plan , perhaps they could live with
it . She did not want to cause unnecessary delay , but she had indicated from the very
beginning that special meetings could be called and that offer is still open . She hoped the
Commissioners would understand that she and the HRAC members worked very faithfully
to bring about a project that everyone could be proud of and also preserve our heritage . She
advised that she would like to have it referred back to the HRAC .
January 23 , 2001
70
1 �
B 5 6
� � `
!
_ 777
77
a
y9 S t
} r E N 3 •1 t
s t
3 ' , 1 1
71F71l ni
a L 4 k . 1 f •t t X; } l i
, .. y„ . t; .^ti�-Prgw&t .ar ?z,. l . ' r ,a.
, :ice W r
!s i
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED
for discussion by Vice Chairman Stanbridge to approve staff' s
recommendation .
Under discussion , Vice Chainnan Stanbridge thought this revision should be brought
back to the Historic Resources Advisory Committee . She also wanted to clarify that the
report given by the developer had some very glaring errors in it . The time frame referred to
as a " delay " was not on the part of the HRAC or the County . The information was not
furnished on a timely basis to make the necessary decisions . She mentioned as an example ,
that at the first meeting it was discovered that there was a crossroad on Jungle Trail that was
a traffic hazard . Public Works Director James W . Davis spent a number of months working
with the developer on correcting that .
Chairman Ginn asked if Vice Chairman Stanbridge wanted the matter sent back to the
HRAC .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge had questions concerning the micro - siting of the project
which is better than the first plan which clear cut 70 feet of the County ' s right- of-way . That
plan also had two sidewalks and other strange things on an historical road that was never
wider than 12 or 18 feet . She understood it was necessary to comply with code , but this was
extreme . If the committee members could see this revised plan , perhaps they could live with
it . She did not want to cause unnecessary delay , but she had indicated from the very
beginning that special meetings could be called and that offer is still open . She hoped the
Commissioners would understand that she and the HRAC members worked very faithfully
to bring about a project that everyone could be proud of and also preserve our heritage . She
advised that she would like to have it referred back to the HRAC .
January 23 , 2001
70
1 �
B 5 6
� � `
!
_ 777
77
a
y9 S t
} r E N 3 •1 t
s t
. .F . . ..,'' . . i4... . ' . .:: ✓ *: , d z :: L Hca,�- `er' :a. :x 5 ' 'r .i .s.� 5 r ,r:,..dt
: Kyx a:.` :§"r hr , v i 5 '': n .0 .r. xt: a
Commissioner Adams WITHDREW her motion -, Vice Chairman
Stanbridge WITHDREW her second .
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge ,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , to refer this matter to
the Historic Resources Advisory Committee .
Commissioner Macht asked what Vice Chairman Stanbridge expected the HRAC to
do , and Chairman Ginn and Vice Chairman Stanbridge stated the committee would review
this plan and return a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners .
Philippe Jacques , attorney representing CRC Development Company , spoke of the
process that had occurred in this matter . He advised that the developer had no agenda on
designing the road other than whatever the County wanted . He detailed how the road design
process was begun in April and had proceeded . He advised that the design was not
something the developer was trying to dictate nor argue , but has agreeably responded to
whatever the County wanted . They are frustrated with this process because they are trying
to comply with a County ordinance that has no criteria as to how an historical road should
look . He advised of all the specific changes they had made to the plan based on either staff' s
recommendation or the HRAC members ' comments . All of those resulted in the plan
presented at this meeting . They were now nine months into the process and this small
portion of the road seems to be a problem because the developer is trying to meet unstated
criteria . They are concerned that a further delay would send the wrong message to the
community . Someone trying to comply with an historical designation will be in for a very
long and difficult process without any hard set criteria . Now the motion is to send it back
yet again to the HRAC for another review , which might lead to a fourth redesign on a road
January 23 , 2001
71
BE . PG857
x777r e _
l r
•. ,* - rx T „ e iyo .f
..,
. .F . . ..,'' . . i4... . ' . .:: ✓ *: , d z :: L Hca,�- `er' :a. :x 5 ' 'r .i .s.� 5 r ,r:,..dt
: Kyx a:.` :§"r hr , v i 5 '': n .0 .r. xt: a
Commissioner Adams WITHDREW her motion -, Vice Chairman
Stanbridge WITHDREW her second .
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge ,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , to refer this matter to
the Historic Resources Advisory Committee .
Commissioner Macht asked what Vice Chairman Stanbridge expected the HRAC to
do , and Chairman Ginn and Vice Chairman Stanbridge stated the committee would review
this plan and return a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners .
Philippe Jacques , attorney representing CRC Development Company , spoke of the
process that had occurred in this matter . He advised that the developer had no agenda on
designing the road other than whatever the County wanted . He detailed how the road design
process was begun in April and had proceeded . He advised that the design was not
something the developer was trying to dictate nor argue , but has agreeably responded to
whatever the County wanted . They are frustrated with this process because they are trying
to comply with a County ordinance that has no criteria as to how an historical road should
look . He advised of all the specific changes they had made to the plan based on either staff' s
recommendation or the HRAC members ' comments . All of those resulted in the plan
presented at this meeting . They were now nine months into the process and this small
portion of the road seems to be a problem because the developer is trying to meet unstated
criteria . They are concerned that a further delay would send the wrong message to the
community . Someone trying to comply with an historical designation will be in for a very
long and difficult process without any hard set criteria . Now the motion is to send it back
yet again to the HRAC for another review , which might lead to a fourth redesign on a road
January 23 , 2001
71
BE . PG857
x777r e _
l r
•. ,* - rx T „ e iyo .f
..,
n s ✓ }
r }
f
"b�,.3 .
el
that is not under dispute . The developer was feeling frustration and having to incur extra
expenses on the redesigns and was unable to move forward . He asked the Commissioners
to help find a way to put an end to the process , giving the County what it wants in an
efficient and timely manner .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge responded that the nine month process did not concentrate
on the historical road . There were other aspects of the project that the HRAC did not have ,
such as the safety issue which had to be worked out by Public Works . This most recent plan
looked fine to her, but she was only the Chairman of the HRAC . She felt the other members
should have the opportunity to see the plan before the Board moved it forward . Her
questions were 1 ) who will micro - site ; and 2 ) will there be canopy trees . Both times it was
before the HVAC , the plan was that the whole 70 feet of that right- of-way would be clear
ri cut and every tree would have been eliminated down that road . She did not think a negative
message was being sent to the community . She felt the community wanted to know that the
Commissioners were protecting their heritage .
Mr . Jacques asked if the HRAC could be authorized to give the final approval so his
client could proceed from that point . If that was not possible , he asked how long this might
be delayed .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge suggested the Board defer this to the first meeting in
February and in the meantime she would bring it to the HRAC members for their comments
to be brought to the Board ' s first meeting in February .
Mr . Jacques appreciated the Board ' s concerns for the developer and agreeing to speed
up the process .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge WITHDREW her motion , and
Commissioner Adams WITHDREW her second .
January 23 , 2001
811 ! iOPG858 72
N
IT , IT
4 Ilk
IT
tl
fr j
n s ✓ }
r }
f
"b�,.3 .
el
that is not under dispute . The developer was feeling frustration and having to incur extra
expenses on the redesigns and was unable to move forward . He asked the Commissioners
to help find a way to put an end to the process , giving the County what it wants in an
efficient and timely manner .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge responded that the nine month process did not concentrate
on the historical road . There were other aspects of the project that the HRAC did not have ,
such as the safety issue which had to be worked out by Public Works . This most recent plan
looked fine to her, but she was only the Chairman of the HRAC . She felt the other members
should have the opportunity to see the plan before the Board moved it forward . Her
questions were 1 ) who will micro - site ; and 2 ) will there be canopy trees . Both times it was
before the HVAC , the plan was that the whole 70 feet of that right- of-way would be clear
ri cut and every tree would have been eliminated down that road . She did not think a negative
message was being sent to the community . She felt the community wanted to know that the
Commissioners were protecting their heritage .
Mr . Jacques asked if the HRAC could be authorized to give the final approval so his
client could proceed from that point . If that was not possible , he asked how long this might
be delayed .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge suggested the Board defer this to the first meeting in
February and in the meantime she would bring it to the HRAC members for their comments
to be brought to the Board ' s first meeting in February .
Mr . Jacques appreciated the Board ' s concerns for the developer and agreeing to speed
up the process .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge WITHDREW her motion , and
Commissioner Adams WITHDREW her second .
January 23 , 2001
811 ! iOPG858 72
N
IT , IT
4 Ilk
IT
tl
fr j
> y. t
r d3 . r 3 J
-Ik
i J v A 'Y ti
a ?2: ell" 14
aC " m` �fi .�, rr mss: '1.a 7" ". F e y y `" rY a sa.,
4. t `
S±z 'Iffy
ON MOTION by Commissioner Maeht , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge . the Board unanimously deferred the
matter to the February 6 , 2001 meeting . ( CLERK ' S NOTE :
First scheduled meeting in February was canceled . Therefore ,
first meeting was February 13 , 2001 . )
11 . G . 1 . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT - DAVID AND ELAN
FELDMAN - KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE II (RIGHT- OF- WAY
BETWEEN IST STREET SW AND 4TH STREET) - DRAINAGE
EASEMENT AND DENSITY CREDIT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 9 , 2001 :
TO : James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E .
Public Works Director
FROM : Terry B . Thompson , P . E � f�
Capital Projects ManageY`
SUBJECT : Kings Highway Phase 11
Feldman Property
DATE : January 9 , 2001 FAPublic Works\Capital Pro)ectsUKingsPh2\correspondence\Feldman.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Twenty feet (20' ) of additional right-of-way is needed along the Feldman property on the
west side of Kings Highway between 151 Street SW and 4th Street. A 1 .29 acre parcel for
stormwater retention is also needed in this area . An Agreement has been reached
between the Developer, David and Elan Feldman , and County staff whereby the Developer
will take density credit through the planned development process in lieu of cash
compensation for said parcels . The developer would be allowed to join and expand the
pond at a later date when the remainder site is developed , if desired .
The Agreement includes a drainage easement for a ditch to convey stormwater to the
retention pond and an ingress egress easement for maintenance access to the ditch and
pond . The Agreement also includes a provision for the County to pay the Developer' s
engineer, Knight, McGuire & Associates , Inc . , $ 1 , 000 . 00 for review of construction plans .
January 23 , 2001
73
71 i
q
If
4 y ! L
F
z ,
A
a
r
fY
i r r
> y. t
r d3 . r 3 J
-Ik
i J v A 'Y ti
a ?2: ell" 14
aC " m` �fi .�, rr mss: '1.a 7" ". F e y y `" rY a sa.,
4. t `
S±z 'Iffy
ON MOTION by Commissioner Maeht , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge . the Board unanimously deferred the
matter to the February 6 , 2001 meeting . ( CLERK ' S NOTE :
First scheduled meeting in February was canceled . Therefore ,
first meeting was February 13 , 2001 . )
11 . G . 1 . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT - DAVID AND ELAN
FELDMAN - KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE II (RIGHT- OF- WAY
BETWEEN IST STREET SW AND 4TH STREET) - DRAINAGE
EASEMENT AND DENSITY CREDIT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 9 , 2001 :
TO : James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E .
Public Works Director
FROM : Terry B . Thompson , P . E � f�
Capital Projects ManageY`
SUBJECT : Kings Highway Phase 11
Feldman Property
DATE : January 9 , 2001 FAPublic Works\Capital Pro)ectsUKingsPh2\correspondence\Feldman.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Twenty feet (20' ) of additional right-of-way is needed along the Feldman property on the
west side of Kings Highway between 151 Street SW and 4th Street. A 1 .29 acre parcel for
stormwater retention is also needed in this area . An Agreement has been reached
between the Developer, David and Elan Feldman , and County staff whereby the Developer
will take density credit through the planned development process in lieu of cash
compensation for said parcels . The developer would be allowed to join and expand the
pond at a later date when the remainder site is developed , if desired .
The Agreement includes a drainage easement for a ditch to convey stormwater to the
retention pond and an ingress egress easement for maintenance access to the ditch and
pond . The Agreement also includes a provision for the County to pay the Developer' s
engineer, Knight, McGuire & Associates , Inc . , $ 1 , 000 . 00 for review of construction plans .
January 23 , 2001
73
71 i
q
If
4 y ! L
F
z ,
A
a
r
fY
i r r
If
Iz
If5, tz <. =,r at i .a rcs ✓ w ' Ir > e
„° is- n S v nt .^ . .v ,.w .. x a ., .� .� . v ;. e .,::f t'`m` t .au ra u" ;,`z"'
,t * +`"' < • t
- ' IV
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ELINDING
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached
Agreement. Funding is from Account #315-214- 541 -066 . 12 .
ATTACHMENT
Developer' s Agreement with Exhibits
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
Developer ' s Agreement with David and Elan Feldman as
presented and as recommended by staff in the memorandum .
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
UeGal DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT — THE COLONY — ELM
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES , LLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 9 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler ,
County Administrator
FROM : James W . Davis , P . E .
Public Works Director 1
SUBJECT : Developer ' s Agreement - The Colony
REF . LETTER : Bruce Barkett to James W . Davis dated December 28 , 2000
DATE : January 9 , 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The developer of The Colony , a proposed planned residential golf
course community to be located between 27 ` h Avenue and 43rd Avenue
north of 17th Street SW , is in agreement to cost share with the
County to construct 17 `h Street SW between 27 `h Avenue and 43rd
Avenue , including a 3 - lane bridge over the 43rd Avenue canal and a
left turn lane along 43rd Avenue . The attached Developer ' s
Agreement defines both parties responsibilities as follows :
January 23 , 2001
74
P ` 19 6 0
f III
,
If
Iz
If5, tz <. =,r at i .a rcs ✓ w ' Ir > e
„° is- n S v nt .^ . .v ,.w .. x a ., .� .� . v ;. e .,::f t'`m` t .au ra u" ;,`z"'
,t * +`"' < • t
- ' IV
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ELINDING
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached
Agreement. Funding is from Account #315-214- 541 -066 . 12 .
ATTACHMENT
Developer' s Agreement with Exhibits
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the
Developer ' s Agreement with David and Elan Feldman as
presented and as recommended by staff in the memorandum .
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
UeGal DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT — THE COLONY — ELM
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES , LLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 9 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler ,
County Administrator
FROM : James W . Davis , P . E .
Public Works Director 1
SUBJECT : Developer ' s Agreement - The Colony
REF . LETTER : Bruce Barkett to James W . Davis dated December 28 , 2000
DATE : January 9 , 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The developer of The Colony , a proposed planned residential golf
course community to be located between 27 ` h Avenue and 43rd Avenue
north of 17th Street SW , is in agreement to cost share with the
County to construct 17 `h Street SW between 27 `h Avenue and 43rd
Avenue , including a 3 - lane bridge over the 43rd Avenue canal and a
left turn lane along 43rd Avenue . The attached Developer ' s
Agreement defines both parties responsibilities as follows :
January 23 , 2001
74
P ` 19 6 0
f III
,
` b If I � � ' If
e
1 ? nxf § °= s ' �` 1 : . Aef 3 'av "gyro- ds3 $q✓ 'ss ✓1 4
a %u% r »a» ✓H3�r aIf
rr
Developer :
1 . Engineer , permit , and construct a two - lane paved road along 17th
Street SW between 27t " Avenue and 43rd Avenue in two phases .
Funding shall be 25 % by Developer / 75 & by County . Total cost is
estimated to be $ 400 , 000 .
2 . Engineer , permit , and construct a 3 - lane bridge at 17th Street SW
over the 43rd Avenue canal . The developer will pay $ 200 , 000 of
the estimated $ 500 , 000 cost . The Developer will receive traffic
impact fee credits in exchange for the $ 200 , 000 funding , but can
use no more than 30 credits per year until all credits are
utilized .
3 . Engineer , design , and construct a left - turn lane along 43rd
Avenue SW to serve 17th Street SW ,
4 , Donate 30 ' of right - of - way of 17 `" Street SW ( approximately 3 . 64
acres at a value of $ 40 , 873 )
5 . Construct and provide stormwater treatment for 17th Street SW
runoff .
COUNTY :
1 . Purchase 4 . 782 acres of 17th Street Right - of - way from developer
$ 53 , 754 , less any Murphy Act right - of - way that the County
already has encumbered .
2 . Purchase needed right - of - way along 43rd Avenue and 17tr' Street SW
east of 27t " Avenue , if necessary . Estimated cost is $ 20 , 000 .
3 . Fund 75 % of cost of 17 " Street SW from 27th Avenue SW to 43rd
Avenue SW at a cost of approximately $ 300 , 000 ( county share ) ,
$ 300 , 000 for bridge over 43rd Avenue canal , and $ 150 , 000 for 43rd
Avenue left turn lane onto 17th Street SW .
Estimated Developer Cost $ 340 , 873
Estimated County Cost $ 823 , 754
The above cost shall be over several years since the project will
be built in phases .
ALTERNATIVES AM AN TYRTs
The alternatives presented are as follows :
i
Alterna i rp No 1
Approve the developer ' s agreement and authorize the Chairman ' s
signature ,
Alternative No
Renegotiate the agreement ,
January 23 , 2001
75
PG861
77 71T
Ifh
u ... .. - . ..
` b If I � � ' If
e
1 ? nxf § °= s ' �` 1 : . Aef 3 'av "gyro- ds3 $q✓ 'ss ✓1 4
a %u% r »a» ✓H3�r aIf
rr
Developer :
1 . Engineer , permit , and construct a two - lane paved road along 17th
Street SW between 27t " Avenue and 43rd Avenue in two phases .
Funding shall be 25 % by Developer / 75 & by County . Total cost is
estimated to be $ 400 , 000 .
2 . Engineer , permit , and construct a 3 - lane bridge at 17th Street SW
over the 43rd Avenue canal . The developer will pay $ 200 , 000 of
the estimated $ 500 , 000 cost . The Developer will receive traffic
impact fee credits in exchange for the $ 200 , 000 funding , but can
use no more than 30 credits per year until all credits are
utilized .
3 . Engineer , design , and construct a left - turn lane along 43rd
Avenue SW to serve 17th Street SW ,
4 , Donate 30 ' of right - of - way of 17 `" Street SW ( approximately 3 . 64
acres at a value of $ 40 , 873 )
5 . Construct and provide stormwater treatment for 17th Street SW
runoff .
COUNTY :
1 . Purchase 4 . 782 acres of 17th Street Right - of - way from developer
$ 53 , 754 , less any Murphy Act right - of - way that the County
already has encumbered .
2 . Purchase needed right - of - way along 43rd Avenue and 17tr' Street SW
east of 27t " Avenue , if necessary . Estimated cost is $ 20 , 000 .
3 . Fund 75 % of cost of 17 " Street SW from 27th Avenue SW to 43rd
Avenue SW at a cost of approximately $ 300 , 000 ( county share ) ,
$ 300 , 000 for bridge over 43rd Avenue canal , and $ 150 , 000 for 43rd
Avenue left turn lane onto 17th Street SW .
Estimated Developer Cost $ 340 , 873
Estimated County Cost $ 823 , 754
The above cost shall be over several years since the project will
be built in phases .
ALTERNATIVES AM AN TYRTs
The alternatives presented are as follows :
i
Alterna i rp No 1
Approve the developer ' s agreement and authorize the Chairman ' s
signature ,
Alternative No
Renegotiate the agreement ,
January 23 , 2001
75
PG861
77 71T
Ifh
u ... .. - . ..
I Ir
i .. .' .;, ° . aR�' ' +,X t a :. 0 5� tea O. , ' `T fL?��.. c „'"vz `' ;`2 4 %
r f
Y. .
.. . ' i e. ' . .. j
o .. . . . ty. _ 4 "
a :xn y r x • •. -. o f i
.. . . .r J. r t . . ' f r r. y « '
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No . 1 whereby the agreement is
approved . Funding to be from District 3 Traffic Impact Fee , 1G
Sales Tax for right - of - way acquisition , and Local Option Gas Tax .
ATTACHMENT
1 . Developer ' s Agreement
2 . Letter from Bruce - Barkett to James Davis dated January 3 , 2001
3 . Letter from Bruce Barkett to James Davis dated December 28 , 2000
4 . Letter from Bruce Barkett to James Davis dated December 20 , 2000
S . Letter from Bruce Barkett to James Davis dated December 11 , 2000
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously approved the
Developer ' s Agreement with ELM Development Services , LLC ,
for The Colony , and authorized the Chairman to execute same ,
as recommended in the memorandum .
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11 . H . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT WITH ARBOR TRACE
DEVELOPMENT , INC . - MINCH FORCE MAIN ALONG OSLO ROAD
AND 6 - INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG 43RD AVENUE
Utility Services Director Donald R . Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of January 19 ,
2001 , calling the project a "mission of mercy " :
DATE : JANUARY 19. 2001
TO : JAMES E . CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM . DONALD R . HUBBS . ,P . E . \ `
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S6R JAN 2 2 200 ;
ffi_ �
PREPARED STEVEN J . DOYLE_ P . E . CLERK TC 1
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
BY : INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES J
January 23 , 2001
76
BKL; 862
11 ,
fir
rill
` _
I Ir
i .. .' .;, ° . aR�' ' +,X t a :. 0 5� tea O. , ' `T fL?��.. c „'"vz `' ;`2 4 %
r f
Y. .
.. . ' i e. ' . .. j
o .. . . . ty. _ 4 "
a :xn y r x • •. -. o f i
.. . . .r J. r t . . ' f r r. y « '
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No . 1 whereby the agreement is
approved . Funding to be from District 3 Traffic Impact Fee , 1G
Sales Tax for right - of - way acquisition , and Local Option Gas Tax .
ATTACHMENT
1 . Developer ' s Agreement
2 . Letter from Bruce - Barkett to James Davis dated January 3 , 2001
3 . Letter from Bruce Barkett to James Davis dated December 28 , 2000
4 . Letter from Bruce Barkett to James Davis dated December 20 , 2000
S . Letter from Bruce Barkett to James Davis dated December 11 , 2000
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously approved the
Developer ' s Agreement with ELM Development Services , LLC ,
for The Colony , and authorized the Chairman to execute same ,
as recommended in the memorandum .
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11 . H . DEVELOPER ' S AGREEMENT WITH ARBOR TRACE
DEVELOPMENT , INC . - MINCH FORCE MAIN ALONG OSLO ROAD
AND 6 - INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG 43RD AVENUE
Utility Services Director Donald R . Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of January 19 ,
2001 , calling the project a "mission of mercy " :
DATE : JANUARY 19. 2001
TO : JAMES E . CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM . DONALD R . HUBBS . ,P . E . \ `
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S6R JAN 2 2 200 ;
ffi_ �
PREPARED STEVEN J . DOYLE_ P . E . CLERK TC 1
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
BY : INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES J
January 23 , 2001
76
BKL; 862
11 ,
fir
rill
` _
a 1 �
_ .,.. Cy ,r >' ✓'33 'rt ° �, "r grpt Uf : Erni •:; ,� a C ,+ 1> a r„ ,TMa z r r . .
.If s
SUBJECT : DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITKARBOR TRACE DEVELOPMENT INC .
PROPOSED 10-INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG OSLO ROAD AND PROPOSED 6 .
INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG 43 `D AVE
BACKGROUND
Arbor Trace Development is a Planned Unit Development (PUD ) located on the %rest side of 43 `d
Avenue extending from Oslo Rd . to 5 'h Street SW. Refer to Exhibit-C of the attached Developer 's
Agreement . The County has a Master Planned 10-inch force main along Oslo Road . In addition_ the
County has further requested over-sizing (4-inch to 6-inch) of their proposed force main along 43 'd Ave . to
accommodate near future sewage flows from proposed developments to the north, such as the Citrus
Springs PUD currently under construction .
Under the County ' s current utility Master Planning effort it is proposed that approximately 4, 600 lineal r
feet of 10-inch force main be installed along Oslo Road from an existing active force main located at the
intersection of 27 Avenue .
To further serve residential developments north and west of Arbor Trace it is necessary to extend a 6-
inch diameter orce main along 43 ` Ave. for a distance of approximately 2 . 500 lineal feet to the
intersection of 5th St. SW. This proposed 6-inch force main would make connection to another force main
currently under construction by another developer (Citrus Springs) .
Exhibit-C of the attached Developer 's Agreement shows a vicinity map of the proposed force main
extensions along Oslo Rd . and 43 Ave. It also shows the location of the Citrus Springs Development
located northwest of Arbor Trace which will also benefit from proposed force main extensions .
The Developer, in addition to their cost share for sewage, will be paving line extension charges for water in
the amount of $28, 125 . 00
ANALYSIS
As shown in Exhibit - B of the attached Agreement, the estimated cost sharing between the Developer
and the County is as follows :
Descri tion Developer Share ml ICourmr ' s Share
Developers Share for force main over-sizing along 43 ` Ave. $31 , 524 . 76
(See A cement Exhibit-B) - - -
County 's Share for force main over-sizing along 43 ` Ave .
(See reement Exhibit-B) - ' - $20. 547 . 85
County 's Share for 10-inch force main along Oslo Rd . (See
A reement Exhibit-B) - - - $228 . 580 . 16
Total Cost 531 ,524. 76 $249, 128.01
Total Pro ' ect Cost $280,652 . 77
Less Developer's line extension cost for existing water main
alon 43f Ave. (See A cement a 2, item D . ) $28, 125 . 00
Cour 's Final Cost S221 ,003. 01
January 23 , 2001
77
�K d G 863
1, 17 7WJ77 7% 7 77777
If
Y jIfIf
a 1 �
_ .,.. Cy ,r >' ✓'33 'rt ° �, "r grpt Uf : Erni •:; ,� a C ,+ 1> a r„ ,TMa z r r . .
.If s
SUBJECT : DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITKARBOR TRACE DEVELOPMENT INC .
PROPOSED 10-INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG OSLO ROAD AND PROPOSED 6 .
INCH FORCE MAIN ALONG 43 `D AVE
BACKGROUND
Arbor Trace Development is a Planned Unit Development (PUD ) located on the %rest side of 43 `d
Avenue extending from Oslo Rd . to 5 'h Street SW. Refer to Exhibit-C of the attached Developer 's
Agreement . The County has a Master Planned 10-inch force main along Oslo Road . In addition_ the
County has further requested over-sizing (4-inch to 6-inch) of their proposed force main along 43 'd Ave . to
accommodate near future sewage flows from proposed developments to the north, such as the Citrus
Springs PUD currently under construction .
Under the County ' s current utility Master Planning effort it is proposed that approximately 4, 600 lineal r
feet of 10-inch force main be installed along Oslo Road from an existing active force main located at the
intersection of 27 Avenue .
To further serve residential developments north and west of Arbor Trace it is necessary to extend a 6-
inch diameter orce main along 43 ` Ave. for a distance of approximately 2 . 500 lineal feet to the
intersection of 5th St. SW. This proposed 6-inch force main would make connection to another force main
currently under construction by another developer (Citrus Springs) .
Exhibit-C of the attached Developer 's Agreement shows a vicinity map of the proposed force main
extensions along Oslo Rd . and 43 Ave. It also shows the location of the Citrus Springs Development
located northwest of Arbor Trace which will also benefit from proposed force main extensions .
The Developer, in addition to their cost share for sewage, will be paving line extension charges for water in
the amount of $28, 125 . 00
ANALYSIS
As shown in Exhibit - B of the attached Agreement, the estimated cost sharing between the Developer
and the County is as follows :
Descri tion Developer Share ml ICourmr ' s Share
Developers Share for force main over-sizing along 43 ` Ave. $31 , 524 . 76
(See A cement Exhibit-B) - - -
County 's Share for force main over-sizing along 43 ` Ave .
(See reement Exhibit-B) - ' - $20. 547 . 85
County 's Share for 10-inch force main along Oslo Rd . (See
A reement Exhibit-B) - - - $228 . 580 . 16
Total Cost 531 ,524. 76 $249, 128.01
Total Pro ' ect Cost $280,652 . 77
Less Developer's line extension cost for existing water main
alon 43f Ave. (See A cement a 2, item D . ) $28, 125 . 00
Cour 's Final Cost S221 ,003. 01
January 23 , 2001
77
�K d G 863
1, 17 7WJ77 7% 7 77777
If
Y jIfIf
s , + '£ Yr S -cr wt tr x+. f
I If
, . . _ .. .
o-
i
RECOMMENDATION :
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Developer ' s agreement as presented & authorizes the Chairman to execute the same .
`4
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS.
➢ Attachment-A, Developer' s Agreement between Indian River County and Arbor Trace
Development Inc. , Pages 1 thru 6 and Exhibits-A thru C inclusive . ( 1 -Original attached)
ACCOUNT INFORMATION :
ACCOUNT NO : 472 NAME : Utility Capacity Charge Fund AMOUNT: $221 , 003 . 01
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Developer ' s Agreement with Arbor Trace
Development, Inc . , and authorized the Chairman to execute
same , as recommended in the memorandum .
RECORDED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
12 . NEXTEL SOUTH CORP . v . INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - OUTSIDE.
LEGAL COUNSEL PROVIDED BY EXCESS INSURANCE CARRIER
( FLORIDA LEAGUE OF COUNTIES )
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 17 , 2001 :
To : Board of County Commissioners
From : Paul G . Bangel , County Attome)t,/ ► ' � x, l
Re : Nextel South Corp . v. Indian River County, Case No . 01 - 14005Civ- Paine ,
United States District Court , Southern District of Florida
Recommendation :
It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the County
Attorney to engage outside legal counsel of his choice , at a fee rate acceptable to the
County Attorney , to defend the County in the case of Nextel South Corp. v. Indian River
County.
January 23 , 2001
78
� { G 8 6 4
s , + '£ Yr S -cr wt tr x+. f
I If
, . . _ .. .
o-
i
RECOMMENDATION :
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Developer ' s agreement as presented & authorizes the Chairman to execute the same .
`4
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS.
➢ Attachment-A, Developer' s Agreement between Indian River County and Arbor Trace
Development Inc. , Pages 1 thru 6 and Exhibits-A thru C inclusive . ( 1 -Original attached)
ACCOUNT INFORMATION :
ACCOUNT NO : 472 NAME : Utility Capacity Charge Fund AMOUNT: $221 , 003 . 01
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Developer ' s Agreement with Arbor Trace
Development, Inc . , and authorized the Chairman to execute
same , as recommended in the memorandum .
RECORDED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
12 . NEXTEL SOUTH CORP . v . INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - OUTSIDE.
LEGAL COUNSEL PROVIDED BY EXCESS INSURANCE CARRIER
( FLORIDA LEAGUE OF COUNTIES )
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 17 , 2001 :
To : Board of County Commissioners
From : Paul G . Bangel , County Attome)t,/ ► ' � x, l
Re : Nextel South Corp . v. Indian River County, Case No . 01 - 14005Civ- Paine ,
United States District Court , Southern District of Florida
Recommendation :
It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the County
Attorney to engage outside legal counsel of his choice , at a fee rate acceptable to the
County Attorney , to defend the County in the case of Nextel South Corp. v. Indian River
County.
January 23 , 2001
78
� { G 8 6 4
71
. , .
v
-+ i # .mak "" ,. t ?.ky"ty.� { r �' ^t tr . _ ✓ t nK3y l - s
Discussion :
The plaintiff in the above- referenced case initiated litigation against the County
following the County ' s denial of administrative permit use and site plan approval for a
telecommunications tower. The Complaint was served yesterday , and a responsive
pleading is due February 5 , 2001 . In light of the specialized area of the law involved , and
the time that it would take to defend such a lawsuit , it would be appropriate to engage
outside legal counsel for this case .
Inasmuch as agenda materials are due in the County Administrator' s Office by noon
today , it has not been possible to make a recommendation of a particular attorney or law
firm within twenty-four hours from the time of service . The deadline for response to the
Complaint precedes the February 6 , 2001 , regular Board meeting .
PGB
County Attorney Bangel informed the Commissioners that, subsequent to the agenda
deadline and preparation of the above memo , he had learned that the County ' s excess
insurance carrier, Florida League of Counties , will defend Indian River County in the above
lawsuit . Therefore , the request in the above memo is moot .
In response to Vice Chairman Ginn ' s understanding, he advised that the same finn
will defend two municipalities in similar lawsuits with Nextel .
13 . Be VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE — LOST TREE ISLANDS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised of a proposed agreement now in Tallahassee
concerning the Lost Tree Islands . She viewed this as another attempt to " end run " the legal
process . She explained her understanding of the matter which was scheduled to go before
the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund on February 6 , 2001 .
( CLERK ' S NOTE : Subsequent to the meeting , Vice Chairman Stanbridge wrote a
memorandum dated January 23 , 2001 , concerning this matter and that memorandum is
inserted below giving available information . )
January 23 , 2001
79
71
. , .
v
-+ i # .mak "" ,. t ?.ky"ty.� { r �' ^t tr . _ ✓ t nK3y l - s
Discussion :
The plaintiff in the above- referenced case initiated litigation against the County
following the County ' s denial of administrative permit use and site plan approval for a
telecommunications tower. The Complaint was served yesterday , and a responsive
pleading is due February 5 , 2001 . In light of the specialized area of the law involved , and
the time that it would take to defend such a lawsuit , it would be appropriate to engage
outside legal counsel for this case .
Inasmuch as agenda materials are due in the County Administrator' s Office by noon
today , it has not been possible to make a recommendation of a particular attorney or law
firm within twenty-four hours from the time of service . The deadline for response to the
Complaint precedes the February 6 , 2001 , regular Board meeting .
PGB
County Attorney Bangel informed the Commissioners that, subsequent to the agenda
deadline and preparation of the above memo , he had learned that the County ' s excess
insurance carrier, Florida League of Counties , will defend Indian River County in the above
lawsuit . Therefore , the request in the above memo is moot .
In response to Vice Chairman Ginn ' s understanding, he advised that the same finn
will defend two municipalities in similar lawsuits with Nextel .
13 . Be VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE — LOST TREE ISLANDS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised of a proposed agreement now in Tallahassee
concerning the Lost Tree Islands . She viewed this as another attempt to " end run " the legal
process . She explained her understanding of the matter which was scheduled to go before
the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund on February 6 , 2001 .
( CLERK ' S NOTE : Subsequent to the meeting , Vice Chairman Stanbridge wrote a
memorandum dated January 23 , 2001 , concerning this matter and that memorandum is
inserted below giving available information . )
January 23 , 2001
79
TO : Board of County Commissioners
DATE : January 23 , 2001
SUBJECT : PROPOSED AGREEMENT — LOST TREE ISLANDS
FROM : Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Listed below is the time schedule for the Trustee's meeting on February 611`
Secretary Struhs' s office or the Governor's office may be of help in providing
more information about any ' proposed agreement. As of today, it has not been
decided whether this item will be placed on this agenda, but a decision will have
to be made shortly.
Tuesday (January 231 or Wednesday rJanuary 241:
Decision by State Lands on placing Lost Tree Village 'Agreemento
on the next Trustees agenda
Friday. January 26 . 2001 : 7f+
Agenda available for February Trustees meeting C
JAN
Wednesday. January 31 . 2001 :
Cabinet aides meeting — 9: 00 am — Open to the Public CLERK TO THE BOARD
Tuesday , February 6. 2001 :
Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund (Governor and Cabinet)
9: 00 am — Open to the Public
The information on this ' proposed agreement is sketchy at best. My
understanding is 54 to 67 units on the 'inner islands' [difference in number
depends upon sewer hookup] ; all disputed submerged lands quitclaimed to the
State except area of bridge, utility lines to the ' inner islandsand a 2546o ring
around the islands for single-family docks. McCullers Point would be deeded to
the State with restoration resulting in mitigation credits. The 'outer islands'
would be restricted to Golf Course Only , but would have water line for irrigation
and a 'fent' . When 1 asked for the benefits to the public. The answers were the
fringe around the " inner islands" , sewer hookup on properties on the mainland
[barrier island] and McCullers Point , (very much a wetland) . 1 should think the
legal actions used by LTV on the municipalities would also go away , but that was
not discussed .
January 23 , 2001
80
t5 a G 19 6 6
TO : Board of County Commissioners
DATE : January 23 , 2001
SUBJECT : PROPOSED AGREEMENT — LOST TREE ISLANDS
FROM : Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Listed below is the time schedule for the Trustee's meeting on February 611`
Secretary Struhs' s office or the Governor's office may be of help in providing
more information about any ' proposed agreement. As of today, it has not been
decided whether this item will be placed on this agenda, but a decision will have
to be made shortly.
Tuesday (January 231 or Wednesday rJanuary 241:
Decision by State Lands on placing Lost Tree Village 'Agreemento
on the next Trustees agenda
Friday. January 26 . 2001 : 7f+
Agenda available for February Trustees meeting C
JAN
Wednesday. January 31 . 2001 :
Cabinet aides meeting — 9: 00 am — Open to the Public CLERK TO THE BOARD
Tuesday , February 6. 2001 :
Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund (Governor and Cabinet)
9: 00 am — Open to the Public
The information on this ' proposed agreement is sketchy at best. My
understanding is 54 to 67 units on the 'inner islands' [difference in number
depends upon sewer hookup] ; all disputed submerged lands quitclaimed to the
State except area of bridge, utility lines to the ' inner islandsand a 2546o ring
around the islands for single-family docks. McCullers Point would be deeded to
the State with restoration resulting in mitigation credits. The 'outer islands'
would be restricted to Golf Course Only , but would have water line for irrigation
and a 'fent' . When 1 asked for the benefits to the public. The answers were the
fringe around the " inner islands" , sewer hookup on properties on the mainland
[barrier island] and McCullers Point , (very much a wetland) . 1 should think the
legal actions used by LTV on the municipalities would also go away , but that was
not discussed .
January 23 , 2001
80
t5 a G 19 6 6
k f r .G i
�77777W77� 01 7T ,
Vice Chairman Stanbridge understood it would take a super- majority vote by the
Trustees to approve the proposed agreement , but indicated there may be a split vote . She felt
that efforts should be made to keep the matter off the Trustee ' s agenda and reminded the
Board that there is now a legal matter pending in the 4 "' District Court of Appeals to clarify
ownership of the submerged lands which should be allowed to proceed .
Commissioner Macht thought this was a local matter as well as a legal matter and was
not correctly before the Trustees .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams to send a letter
scribed by Vice Chairman Stanbridge for Chairman Ginn ' s signature ,
SECONDED by Chairman Ginn .
Chairman Ginn asked that Vice Chairman Stanbridge make the meeting dates available to the
press , advise of the cause , provide telephone numbers and e -mail addresses so Tallahassee could be
flooded with objections .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that the environmental agencies are already fighting this
proposed agreement . She thought it might be possible that, by strongly objecting to this new attempt
to bypass the court , it will be taken off the agenda for the February 6th Trustee ' s meeting .
i
i
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously .
(CLERK ' S NOTE : COPIES OF LETTERS SENT ON
BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TO VARIOUS OFFICES IN TALLAHASSEE ARE ON FILE
WITH THE BACKUP OF THE MEETING
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD . )
January 23 , 2001
81
i bu67
k f r .G i
�77777W77� 01 7T ,
Vice Chairman Stanbridge understood it would take a super- majority vote by the
Trustees to approve the proposed agreement , but indicated there may be a split vote . She felt
that efforts should be made to keep the matter off the Trustee ' s agenda and reminded the
Board that there is now a legal matter pending in the 4 "' District Court of Appeals to clarify
ownership of the submerged lands which should be allowed to proceed .
Commissioner Macht thought this was a local matter as well as a legal matter and was
not correctly before the Trustees .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams to send a letter
scribed by Vice Chairman Stanbridge for Chairman Ginn ' s signature ,
SECONDED by Chairman Ginn .
Chairman Ginn asked that Vice Chairman Stanbridge make the meeting dates available to the
press , advise of the cause , provide telephone numbers and e -mail addresses so Tallahassee could be
flooded with objections .
Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that the environmental agencies are already fighting this
proposed agreement . She thought it might be possible that, by strongly objecting to this new attempt
to bypass the court , it will be taken off the agenda for the February 6th Trustee ' s meeting .
i
i
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously .
(CLERK ' S NOTE : COPIES OF LETTERS SENT ON
BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TO VARIOUS OFFICES IN TALLAHASSEE ARE ON FILE
WITH THE BACKUP OF THE MEETING
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD . )
January 23 , 2001
81
i bu67
G
tel to
.R4tt
13 . F . COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS
FOR 2001 AND FILLING OF VACANCIES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3 , 2001 and list :
TO : Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE : January 3 , 2001
SUBJECT : COMMITTEE RE-APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2001
AND FILLING OF VACANCIES
*1mao
FROM : Kimberly E . M sung
Executive Aide to the Commission
Description and Condition
The following committees have members that need to be re- appointed for the year 2001 or have
vacancies that the Board needs to seek replacements for.
Recommendation
Unless the Board decides to do otherwise, the following standing members will be re-appointed for
the next term . Appointments to fill vacancies will be brought to the Board on a committee by
committee appointment basis .
Attachment- 1999/2000 Attendance Report
Re-appointments/Vacancies for 2001 :
Agriculture Advisory Committee (2 -vear term )
Commissioner Fran Adams
Dave Berggren (Associated Industry Representative)
Jerry Johnson (Associated Industry Representative )
Mark Sanchez ( Citrus Representative)
Vacancy (Vegetable Representative)
January 23 , 2001
b 82
Iv
[Ir I I itltl 61 ' ' 1 4
k
G
tel to
.R4tt
13 . F . COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS
FOR 2001 AND FILLING OF VACANCIES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3 , 2001 and list :
TO : Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE : January 3 , 2001
SUBJECT : COMMITTEE RE-APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2001
AND FILLING OF VACANCIES
*1mao
FROM : Kimberly E . M sung
Executive Aide to the Commission
Description and Condition
The following committees have members that need to be re- appointed for the year 2001 or have
vacancies that the Board needs to seek replacements for.
Recommendation
Unless the Board decides to do otherwise, the following standing members will be re-appointed for
the next term . Appointments to fill vacancies will be brought to the Board on a committee by
committee appointment basis .
Attachment- 1999/2000 Attendance Report
Re-appointments/Vacancies for 2001 :
Agriculture Advisory Committee (2 -vear term )
Commissioner Fran Adams
Dave Berggren (Associated Industry Representative)
Jerry Johnson (Associated Industry Representative )
Mark Sanchez ( Citrus Representative)
Vacancy (Vegetable Representative)
January 23 , 2001
b 82
Iv
[Ir I I itltl 61 ' ' 1 4
k
r � r
Beach & Shore Preservation Advisory Committee (2 -vear term )
Commissioner Fran Adams
Art Neuberger ( City of Vero Beach )
Walter Barnes ( City of Sebastian)
Ernie Polverari (Town of Orchid)
Bob Baker (City of Fellsmere)
Bob Leshe (Indian River Shores)
Thomas Lowther (BCC Representative)
Michael Vanatta (BCC Representative)
George Bunnell (BCC Representative)
Vacancy (BCC Representative)
Board of Zoning Adjustment (2 -year term)
Chris Marine ( Adams/District 1 )
Fred Plair (Macht/District 3 )
Vacancy (Ginn/District 5)
Building Code Board of Adjustments & Appeals — 4 year term
Vacancy (Building Industry Representative)
Vacancy (General Contractor Representative)
Children ' s Services Advisory Committee — 4-vear term
Rolf Bibow (Tippin/District4)
Joan Woodhouse (Member-at-Large)
Code Enforcement Board — unlimited 3-vear term
Jack Owens (Engineer)
Joseph Garone (General Contractor)
Economic Development Council
Vacancy (Fellsmere Representative)
Vacancy (Banking Representative)
Economic Opportunities Council ( l -vear term - State committee)
Joyce Johnston- Carlson
Jerry Morgan
Norma Mooney
Indian River County Extension Advisory Council — 3 vear term
Betty Gipson (Stanbridge/District 2 )
Michael Ziegler (Tippin/District 4)
Vacancy (Macht/District 3)
January 23 , 2001
83
PG 869
r � r
Beach & Shore Preservation Advisory Committee (2 -vear term )
Commissioner Fran Adams
Art Neuberger ( City of Vero Beach )
Walter Barnes ( City of Sebastian)
Ernie Polverari (Town of Orchid)
Bob Baker (City of Fellsmere)
Bob Leshe (Indian River Shores)
Thomas Lowther (BCC Representative)
Michael Vanatta (BCC Representative)
George Bunnell (BCC Representative)
Vacancy (BCC Representative)
Board of Zoning Adjustment (2 -year term)
Chris Marine ( Adams/District 1 )
Fred Plair (Macht/District 3 )
Vacancy (Ginn/District 5)
Building Code Board of Adjustments & Appeals — 4 year term
Vacancy (Building Industry Representative)
Vacancy (General Contractor Representative)
Children ' s Services Advisory Committee — 4-vear term
Rolf Bibow (Tippin/District4)
Joan Woodhouse (Member-at-Large)
Code Enforcement Board — unlimited 3-vear term
Jack Owens (Engineer)
Joseph Garone (General Contractor)
Economic Development Council
Vacancy (Fellsmere Representative)
Vacancy (Banking Representative)
Economic Opportunities Council ( l -vear term - State committee)
Joyce Johnston- Carlson
Jerry Morgan
Norma Mooney
Indian River County Extension Advisory Council — 3 vear term
Betty Gipson (Stanbridge/District 2 )
Michael Ziegler (Tippin/District 4)
Vacancy (Macht/District 3)
January 23 , 2001
83
PG 869
Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (2 vear term)
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Art Neuberger (City of Vero Beach Representative)
Ed Majcher (City of Sebastian Representative)
Robert Leshe (Town of Indian River Shores Representative)
Lee D . "Toni" Robinson (Indian River Land Trust Representative)
Richard Baker (Pelican Island Audubon Society Representative)
Talmage Rogers (Chamber of Commerce Representative)
Jim Granse (Taxpayer ' s Association Representative)
Janice Broda (Mosquito Control District Representative)
Dennis Forbes (Member at Large)
C . C. `Bud" Kleckner (Sierra Club Representative)
Vacancy (Developer Representative)
Vacancy (Civic Association)
Metropolitan Planning Organization — 4 vear term for County Commissioners and
Commissioner John Tippin
Commissioner Caroline Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Parks and Recreation Committee — I vear term
Commissioner Fran Adams
John Capra (City of Vero Beach Representative)
Susan Wilson (City of Fellsmere Representative)
Nancy Diamond (City of Sebastian Representative)
Ed Majcher (Alternate-City of Sebastian Representative)
Barbara Holmen-McKenna (Indian River Shores Representative)
Bill Wilson (Gifford Representative)
James Jenkins (Alternate-Gifford Representative)
Dale Klaus (School Boad Representative)
Billie Minnis (North County Representative)
Scott Chisholm (South County Representative )
Planning & Zoning Board — 4 year term
George Hamner (Member-at-Large)
Donna Keys (Adams/District 1 )
Leland N. "Bud " Gibbs (Macht/District 3 )
Gene Winne (Ginn/District 5 )
Professional Services Advisory Committee — 2 vear term
Rodney Paradise
Robert Gaskill
Vacancy
January 23 , 2001
84
0 7 0
Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (2 vear term)
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Art Neuberger (City of Vero Beach Representative)
Ed Majcher (City of Sebastian Representative)
Robert Leshe (Town of Indian River Shores Representative)
Lee D . "Toni" Robinson (Indian River Land Trust Representative)
Richard Baker (Pelican Island Audubon Society Representative)
Talmage Rogers (Chamber of Commerce Representative)
Jim Granse (Taxpayer ' s Association Representative)
Janice Broda (Mosquito Control District Representative)
Dennis Forbes (Member at Large)
C . C. `Bud" Kleckner (Sierra Club Representative)
Vacancy (Developer Representative)
Vacancy (Civic Association)
Metropolitan Planning Organization — 4 vear term for County Commissioners and
Commissioner John Tippin
Commissioner Caroline Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Parks and Recreation Committee — I vear term
Commissioner Fran Adams
John Capra (City of Vero Beach Representative)
Susan Wilson (City of Fellsmere Representative)
Nancy Diamond (City of Sebastian Representative)
Ed Majcher (Alternate-City of Sebastian Representative)
Barbara Holmen-McKenna (Indian River Shores Representative)
Bill Wilson (Gifford Representative)
James Jenkins (Alternate-Gifford Representative)
Dale Klaus (School Boad Representative)
Billie Minnis (North County Representative)
Scott Chisholm (South County Representative )
Planning & Zoning Board — 4 year term
George Hamner (Member-at-Large)
Donna Keys (Adams/District 1 )
Leland N. "Bud " Gibbs (Macht/District 3 )
Gene Winne (Ginn/District 5 )
Professional Services Advisory Committee — 2 vear term
Rodney Paradise
Robert Gaskill
Vacancy
January 23 , 2001
84
0 7 0
Tourist Development Council — 4 year term
Ben Bishop( City of Sebastian Representative)
Jon W. Bates (Hotel Owner Representative)
Cheryl Casano (Retail Representative)
Kathryn Beatty-Self (Tourist Development Representative)
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board ( 3 vear term )
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Cookie Geyer (Public Education Community Representative)
Pear1a
J ckso
n (Florida Association of Community Action Representative)
Leland N . "Bud " Gibbs (Citizen Advocate and User representative)
Utility Advisory Committee
Frank Oberbeck (Adams/District 1 )
Andrew Allocco (Stanbridge/District 2)
William C . Johnson (Macht/District 3 )
Commissioner Macht noted he had a vacancy for his appointment to the Children ' s
Services Advisory Committee which had just occurred ; he requested a little time to appoint
someone . He further advised that he had some developmental plans for restructuring the
LAAC ( Land Acquisition Advisory Committee ) which will require the Board ' s approval ,
therefore , he wished to defer filling any vacancies on that committee at the present time .
Chairman Ginn thought it important to have the LAAC up and functioning .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously reappointed all
standing members to the listed committees .
14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None .
January 23 , 2001
85
B B � PG871
Tourist Development Council — 4 year term
Ben Bishop( City of Sebastian Representative)
Jon W. Bates (Hotel Owner Representative)
Cheryl Casano (Retail Representative)
Kathryn Beatty-Self (Tourist Development Representative)
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board ( 3 vear term )
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Cookie Geyer (Public Education Community Representative)
Pear1a
J ckso
n (Florida Association of Community Action Representative)
Leland N . "Bud " Gibbs (Citizen Advocate and User representative)
Utility Advisory Committee
Frank Oberbeck (Adams/District 1 )
Andrew Allocco (Stanbridge/District 2)
William C . Johnson (Macht/District 3 )
Commissioner Macht noted he had a vacancy for his appointment to the Children ' s
Services Advisory Committee which had just occurred ; he requested a little time to appoint
someone . He further advised that he had some developmental plans for restructuring the
LAAC ( Land Acquisition Advisory Committee ) which will require the Board ' s approval ,
therefore , he wished to defer filling any vacancies on that committee at the present time .
Chairman Ginn thought it important to have the LAAC up and functioning .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously reappointed all
standing members to the listed committees .
14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None .
January 23 , 2001
85
B B � PG871
14 . B . SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting , the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District . Those minutes are
being prepared separately .
14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None .
There being no further business , upon motion duly made and seconded , the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 10 : 53 a . m .
ATTEST .
. �
Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman
Minutes approved 11alZ-4fz / 3; � c~� /
January 23 , 2001
86
BIS I P 7 2
14 . B . SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting , the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District . Those minutes are
being prepared separately .
14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None .
There being no further business , upon motion duly made and seconded , the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 10 : 53 a . m .
ATTEST .
. �
Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman
Minutes approved 11alZ-4fz / 3; � c~� /
January 23 , 2001
86
BIS I P 7 2