The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1/9/2001 .. - : ..x fi , . - , :' ✓. : � .. a - r - - . . ' ,> vyr . ,.. �q„ _ 1 .Si,. . ^ ,__ .., f=d'. _ .. . r sa. r✓. n ... .. . ..: r ., . . . '§^ ;. Y + s' r "V. m .. _ , ,_ .5 s a . .. , .i): iY4. ✓ .: , s . . r' xs '"-v m .v .r « :d2*. . , .. . . � .. . ... . N- . : , K-'. . .. ss,.. . . rt,.., _ . . ,. >, ,. . a . .- ,. ., s' . . . ;w x 't ....a.: . . - � • •. _ •-- . , i-. a.. ._ ,.k e > .x,,. , �s`t . . C. .. . ...`ww' a., u4 . . :. ,. .wts. `� .n,F?,: .: .,, , i.., _ . . . . , .... -. , . �' .. _ :. ,, , ., . } k .-:'..,� ,.. , �`.. ..• ; .a° 3* . . .d. ,„. . . -set . .. r "� u:, 1. r ra. r a.:>'. ,. . ., . , ... .*, x. .... . - . . . . . . � . . '� a a ... . .. k� ' t ., ,. . .. „ .. . , s n ,c . . .tt, 5. . - , zaa .,. n . s , . . T .: w^� < w Y„ .:-.h4 ,. . 43d ,;•rt «. . x. r ;}+ 4, x h'. nY: >,"';='w.^ , 3 `,F : { ;n-3 , ... .. ... .. .. ... >a K' ,.w . �... ikx. 4 .n�ex'Y �M:; .Ssa. . .s. � , .✓• :-KS a .� .. K F :... �`` E- � .t..c 'i'd �,- '.,,> �.' �i. , .. , . . �x°' , �f -, _ ,x�. z » e , MINUTES ATTACHED r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA A G E N D A TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 2001 - 9 : 00 A. M . County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840251h Street , Vero Beach , Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman District 5 Ruth M . Stanbridge , Chairman District 2 James E . Chandler, County Administrator Fran B . Adams District 1 Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney Kenneth R . Macht District 3 Kimberly Massung , Executive Aide to BCC John W . Tippin District 4 Jeffrey K . Barton, Clerk to the Board 9 : 00 a . m . 1 . CALL TO ORDER BACKUP PAGES I INVOCATION Rev . Fred Foy Strang , I ” Presbyterian Church I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm . Ruth M . Stanbridge � { 4 4a ADDITIONSIDELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 13 . A . 3 . Ft . Pierce Centennial Parade Invitation 13 . B . Additional Homestead Exemption for Persons over 65 with less Than 520 , 000 Annual taxable Income ( " Save Our Seniors " ) x 13 . D . Mandatory Trash Collection and Closing of the Transfer Stations " 13 . E . United Way Campaign Wrap - up 5 . PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES A . Regular Meeting of November 7 , 2000 B . Regular Meeting of November 14 , 2000 7 . CONSENT AGENDA A . Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board : 1) St. Johns River Water Management District Governing '14 11 Board Meeting Schedule for 2001 2) St. Johns Water Control District Amended Notice of Regular Quarterly Meetings of Board of Supervisors for 2001 QKii PG Ys• s '3L a* g x., r '.. e ':$ "z' '� xq, b'` s, sx y ^S rye 2 '* �; xv § xr t s tS lt. rt S �,_ ,�. � r 3 rc y? ra t .fi ke.>nt ♦ r � s _ i '�. � `. r �' r ✓ 1 . C`i aa..a z `a arµ fir„ s. I IF •, �. "� °TAS w AitY 4. "iy 3 t' A ,., � Ez w }L. k Y . s t ] x .z F t .„ a.. t .,^ >;•-'" :3 F x _ r xr ,ye «. .� �- nti•., rs Ya - �s ... � , . /'. zrc GF .+ ., .. , . . . -, ,.. _ . . .. . � � --. �z , > .. . . .n . 4 . . .d� .9, . '^ P�� -'r:&. ,... .� . -4,.R`5.* d v . ,.: . . . , ,N `;� , .,-r . .... k .. n... E s . .;r ., ,± ..- �S;G . . ... r{, t 3. , v "#r. (.. . d,< ,1 .n• !� ". knlx ^ [ r %. . J,'. . 4 ,�,. 's i. vf? �s "'x .,, r_ , ,.. ,,xr . _ '. - : rc ,. . _. etx, . � 3;. ' - ... , . � : +, hrcdt . , � ' ��e`4„ �t�'�� "� rx." � '2`Y'�"�'•f�.e� }x � . .r s ' BACKUP 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont ' d . ) : PAGES B . Approval of Clerk ' s Public Official Bond for the term from 01 /02 /01 through 01 /04/05 ( memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 1 -4 C . Approval of Warrants (memorandum December 28 , 2000) 5 - 11 D . Public Library Advisory Board Appointment (memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 12 - 13 E . Board Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost- Share Agreement Extension Addendum for Oyster Bar Salt Marsh LAAC Site (memorandum dated December 18 , 2000) 14- 16 F . Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Old Orchid Phase 2 P . D . (memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 ) 17 - 19 G . Approval of Expenditures from the Emergency Management Performance Grant (memorandum dated January 2 , 200 1 ) 20 - 22 H . Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 007 (memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 23 -26 ` I . Award of Bid #3034 — Florida Institute of Technology Artificial Reef Fish Census Project (memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 ) 27 - 35 J . Award of Bid # 3019 — Sea Systems Corp . Artificial Reef Survey Project (memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 ) 36 -42 l ' 8 . CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 63 � i a j•C'S,,�, �"->• ,r Y l”& `.it E" z pne. `y '.ah ae { m a, .*v"`x. '� x rs:eru. xw 4 :+ x 1F. t � •s, . .vr x s'rGyes xn ` a Yti ftf,' +M, k, .,?r.•, xrr }Cy .,k' 3, x : t xe'".r.C% ag ,: y r ?fiL t s .'g 3 , +5,:a > :? + x d", s s r - J,. 'q r , :.,�„ kM1 s:,' q 4.`fi' wpt C 3'" !'� .`Y : .f � ,k . a�„,.%i , - ' roar '' '' .Ic` ° 5 {' i }" �;a r , �" t+,. ., fl L ^� v Y::.. e. ✓ ', ,: saIf : ¢ dltp`x,, ;.',.wr f 3'g, ":� i '^✓ t , x'1.x & Y5, F - T n Ft ,4, k :z k:.: 'f tm'£;' x ff 5m, k. 3T4. . i ^ to a+'. :,v➢ .$ a .,., 's$z: 2 +kk4'" k'S i:' 6 .I J . . Ti J n t a .lYx .; a �.., a x<^ ><...,. t ..e ,, . 2y . , . 77 yr bAh m wW, 1� . `•te �P. � ` SP f d ° { ° 8 k r t , ,. . . .. ".� , x . a. S � 'z<" .'e�� . .. � � '. ag. �. 2, .' " t T `. 9 .�.� :.> < •{`. "n"�,y v . r, '` ri ,. � x e '� t „ ^ „ f .,� ,v a , a F,. n . .a_. £.� '$ . iV Y', =? .,. . � s � ...,. fp ^r.. r`*.. _ `� Fv3 ' ` ' c=-�' -: ' . ._ .. .?,. , ➢ . rt'�, ay .; � ' Y'� " '' , q� ` + '^ . .Ir �, .,r _ .,y , z. ,” ? ,. . .a , . , i, �. r., r � �t ,� aU� �. N�.� * , `3v' . j ',F ', d. rs �°3 •$� `�yH � , - ty," , ' ; k. 9 . PUBLIC ITEMS BACKUP Ae PUBLIC HEARINGS PAGES l . Jack Large , Trustee ' s Request for Planned Develop - ment (PD ) Special Exception Use Approval for River Island (Legislative) (memorandum dated December 27 , 2000 ) 43 - 59 2 . Smigiel Partners XII Limited , Inc . ' s Request for Planned Development (PD ) Special Exception Use Approval for Legend Lakes (Legislative) (memorandum dated January 2 , 2001 ) 60- 74 Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS "A None Co PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS None 10 . COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S MATTERS None 11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development None Be Emergency Services None C. General Services None D . Leisure Services None Ee Office of Management and Budget None F. Personnel None G . Public Works 1 . FDOT Supplemental Agreement for Roseland Road Sidewalk (memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 75 - 78 PG 635 r ASy 'A ✓+ 14, P m 1 l IRK lv� Few cI 4 If If BACKUP 11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont ' d ) • PAGES G . Public Works (cont ' d . ) : 2 . Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement for State Project — US 1 from Harrison Street North to Brevard County Line (memorandum dated December 5 , 2000 ) 79- 90 H . Utilities 1 . Bid Award # 3032 — Water, Sewer, and Reclaim Water Rep lac ement/Extension and Miscellaneous Labor Contract ( memorandum dated December 21 , 2000) 91 - 130 2 . Water Production Pumping System Upgrade (memorandum dated December 5 , 2000 ) 131 - 160 I. Human Services None 12 . COUNTY ATTORNEY None 13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Caroline D . Ginn 1 . BCC policy regarding closure of G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital 161 - 167 2 . Permission to travel to Arcadia, Florida to visit G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital Be Vice Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Co Commissioner Fran Be Adams D . Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht B � PG to) 6r` p 13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont ' d . ) : BACKL! P E . Commissioner John W . Tippin PAGES F. Committee Appointments/Reappointments for 2001 and Filling of Vacancies (memorandum dated January 3 , 2001 ) 168 - 176 14 . SPECIAL DISTRICTS /BOARDS A. Emergency Services District None B . Solid Waste Disposal District None C . Environmental Control Board None 15 . ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based . Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County ' s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567 - 8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting . Indian River County WebSite : http : //bccl . co . indian- n' ver. fl . us yty Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library , and North County Library Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1 : 00 p . m . until Friday morning and Saturday 12 : 00 noon until 5 : 00 p. m . � f16PG637 ZZ INDEX TO MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF JANUARY 9 , 2001 1 . CALL TO ORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 . INVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 . ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 5 . PROCLAMATIONS 2 6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 7 , 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 6 . 13 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 21 , 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 7 . CONSENT AGENDA 7 . A . Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7 . 13 . Approval of Clerk ' s Public Official Bond for the Term from 01 /02 /01 Through 01 /04/05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7 . C . Approval of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 . D . Appointment of Beth Mitchell - Perez to Public Library Advisory Board (P . L . A . B . ) ( Replace Kathleen Bishop ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7 . E . Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost - Share Addendum 4 to the Conceptual Approval Agreement for Oyster Bar Salt Marsh LAAC Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . 10 7 . F . Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Old Orchid Phase 2 PD (Planned Development) - Kennedy Properties of Indian River , Inc . . . 12 7 . G . Approval of Expenditures from the Emergency Management Performance Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 7 . H . Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . 15 7 . I . Award of Bid # 3034 to Florida Institute of Technology - Artificial Reef Fish Census Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . 1 . 18 7 . J . Award of Bid # 3019 - Sea Systems Corp . - Artificial Reef Survey Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 1 € P a3 9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - JACK LARGE , TRUSTEE - REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD ) SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR RIVER ISLAND ( Legislative ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 9 . A . 2 . PUBLIC HEARING - SMIGIEL PARTNERS XII LIMITED , INC . ' S REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ( PD ) SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR LEGEND LAKES ( Legislative ) . . 0 1 . 1 . 1 . 10 . . 1 . 1 . . . . . . 32 1 LG . 1 . FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ROSELAND ROAD SIDEWALK - PROJECT 9916 11 . G . 2 . RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 006 - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT - COUNTY LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION ALONG US - I FROM HARRISON STREET TO THE NORTH COUNTY LINE - STATE PROJECT 88010 - 3507 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . 42 11 . H . 1 . BID AWARD # 3032 - WATER, SEWER , AND RECLAIM WATER REPLACEMENT/EXTENSION AND MISCELLANEOUS LABOR CONTRACT - G . E . FRENCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 11 . H . 2 . WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE - SCADA SYSTEM TASK TEAM ANALYSIS /PLAN REPORT - ROCHA CONTROLS , INC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 13 . A . 1 . CHAIRMAN GINN - DISCUSSION TO CLARIFY POLICY REGARDING CLOSURE OF G . PIERCE WOOD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 13 . A . 2 . CHAIRMAN GINN - OUT- OF - COUNTY TRAVEL TO ARCADIA , FLORIDA , TO VISIT G . PIERCE WOOD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL . . . . . . . 55 13 . A . 3 . CHAIRMAN GINN - INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN FORT PIERCE CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION PARADE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0000 . . 55 13 . 13 . VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR PERSONS OVER 65 WITH LESS THAN $ 20 . 000 ANNUAL INCOME ( " SAVE OUR SENIORS " ) - DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 2 r � .. 13 . D . COMMISSIONER MACHT - TRANSFER STATIONS - MANDATORY GARBAGE PICKUP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 13 . E . COMMISSIONER TIPPIN - REPORT ON UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN - PRIZES FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 13 . F . COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS /REAPPOINTMENTS FOR 2001 AND FILLING OF VACANCIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 65 14 . 13 . SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3 K i 16 FIG 64 JanUary 9 , 2001 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers , 1840 25 " Street, Vero Beach , Florida, on Tuesday , January 9 , 2001 . Present were Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman ; Ruth Stanbridge , Vice Chairman ; Fran B . Adams ; Kenneth R . Macht ; and John W . Tippin . Also present were James E . Chandler, County Administrator ; Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney : and Patricia Ridgely , Deputy Clerk . 1 • CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9 : 00 a . m . 2. INVOCATION Rev . Fred Foy Strang of the First Presbyterian Church delivered the invocation . 3 • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chairman Stanbridge led the Pledge to the Flag . 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Chairman Ginn announced the following additions to the agenda : 13 . A . 3 . Ft . Pierce Centennial Parade Invitation ; 13 . 13 . Additional Homestead Exemption for persons over 65 with less than $ 20 , 000 annual taxable income ; January 9 , 2001 1 1I106PG64P1 13 . D . Mandatory Trash Collection and Closing of the Transfer Stations ; 13 . E , United Way Campaign Wrap up . ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously added the above items to the agenda . 5 . PROCLAMATIONS None . 6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 7 2000 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 7 , 2000 . There were none . ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 7 , 2000 , as written and distributed . 6 . B . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 21 2000 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000 . There were none . ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED By Vice Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 21 , 2000 , as written and distributed . January 9 , 2001 t H 6 2 7 . CONSENT AGENDA Z. A . Re orfs Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board 1 . St . Johns River Water Management District Governing Board Meeting Schedule for 2001 2 . St . Johns Water Control District Amended Notice of Regular Quarterly Meetings of Board of Supervisors for 2001 Z. B. Approval of Clerk 's Public O ficial Bond or theTer m from 01/02/01 Through 01/04/05 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3 , 2001 : To : Board of County Commissioners Date : January 3 , 2001 From : PJ Jones , Clerk to the Board Re : Approval of Public Official Bond and Authorization for Payment of Invoice . It would be appreciated if you would approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Public Official Bond for Jeffrey K . Barton, Clerk . Also attached please find invoice in the amount of $ 1 , 527 which requires your approval for payment . Thank you . ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams . the Board unanimously approved and authorized the Chairman to execute the Public Official Bond for Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk , and approved payment of the invoice for same in the amount of $ 1 , 527 , as requested . January 9, 2001 3 131lit) IC043 z 7. C. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 28 , 2000 : TO : HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE : DECEMBER 28, 2000 SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR. , FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136 . 06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes . Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of December 21 , 2000 to December 28 , 2000 . Attachment: ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants , issued by the Clerk to the Board , for the period December 21 - 28 , 2000 , as requested . CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0020928 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020929 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020930 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020931 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020932 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020933 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020934 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020935 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020936 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020937 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020938 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 65 . 00 0020939 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020940 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020941 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0020942 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2000 - 12 - 21 85 . 00 0294945 ANDERSON , FRED 2000 - 12 - 22 239 . 00 January 9 , 2001 4 PG 164 4 CHECK NAME CHECY, CHECK NUMBER o DATE AMOUNT 0294946 ANDERSON , CAMELIA AND CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 22 11 . G 0294947 BIEMANN , GWEN 2000 - 12 - 22 317 . 00 0294948 BROXTON , LYDIA 2000 - 12 - 22 224 . 00 0294949 BEUTTELL , PETER M 2000 - 12 - 22 0294950 SILKEN GROUP 284 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 627 . 00 0294951 BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 2000 - 12 - 22 0294952 BOUYSSOU , STEPHANE H 281 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 324 . 00 0294953 BROOKHAVEN , TOWN OF 2000 - 12 - 22 0294954 BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY 2000 - 12 - 22 96 22 0294955 BURGESS , TANGELA AND 1 , 048 . 44 2000 - 12 - 22 42 . 00 0294956 CORR , RHODA L 2000 - 12 - 22 0294957 CENTURY 21 SEATREK REALTY , INC 2000 - 12 - 22 251 . 00 286 . 00 0294958 C P E ASSOCIATES 2000 - 12 - 22 21800 . 00 0294959 CAPAK , GERALD T 2000 - 12 - 22 0294960 CARONE , PAUL 343 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 369 . 00 0294961 CARLUCCI , LEONARD A 2000 - 12 - 22 0294962 DOOLITTLE , JAMES A & ASSOCIATES 2000 - 12 - 22 343 . 00 0294963 DOVE , E WILSON 4 , 676 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 271 . 00 0294964 EDGEWOOD PLACE ( 305 - 113 ) 2000 - 12 - 22 02949651 EVANS , ALFRED 931 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 400 . 00 02949661 FOGERTY , GEORGE A 2000 - 12 - 22 0294967 FRESH , DANIEL J 300 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 233 . 00 0294968 FT PIERCE , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 22 0294969 FOGARTY ENTERPRISES , INC 811 . 44 0294970 FORD , ROBERT J 2000 - 12 - 22 419 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 331 . 00 0294971 GASKILL , ROBERT 2000 - 12 - 22 0294972 GIFFORD GROVES , LTD 286 . 00 0294973 GRACE ' S LANDING LTD 2000 - 12 - 22 8 , 734 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 5 , 149 . 00 0294974 HOLM , LEO 2000 - 12 - 22 0294975 HUNLEY , J MICHAEL 494 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 414 . 00 0294976 JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES 2000 - 12 - 22 0294977 JAHOLKOWSKI , MIKE 3 , 567 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 337 . 00 0294978 JULIN , PAUL 2000 - 12 - 22 0294979 JOHNSTON , PATTIE 170 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 395 . 00 0294980 JACKOWSKI , MICHAEL 2000 - 12 - 22 0294981 JOHNSON , MICHELLE AND F P & L 2000 - 12 - 22 309 . 00 0294982 JONES , ALPHONSO 19 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 251 . 00 0294983 KOLB , GREGORY L - DECEASED 2000 - 12 - 22 0294984 KNOWLES , MARK OR ANNA 438 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 234 . 00 0294985 KISSIMMEE , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 22 0294986 LAWRENCE , TERRY A 37 . 22 2000 - 12 - 22 177 . 00 0294987 LANGLEY , PHILIP G 2000 - 12 - 22 0294988 LINDSEY GARDEN ' S APARTMENTS 2000 - 12 - 22 235 . 00 0294989 LAPPERT , ANN OR RONALD 9 , 250 . 00 0294990 MIXELL , LLONALD AND / OR 2000 - 12 - 22 234 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 255 . 00 0294991 M O D INVESTMENTS 2000 - 12 - 22 891 . 00 0294992 MONTGOMERY , WILLIAM 2000 - 12 - 22 213 . 00 0294993 MALGERIA , PRISCILLA - 22 0294994 MCGRIFF , SHARON AND CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 22 419 . 00 029499MEAD , THOMAS H OR HELEN S 2000 - 12 - 22 26 . 00 5 0294996 NORMAN , DOUGLAS OR BARBARA 281 . 00 0294997 ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND 2000 - 12 - 22 337 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 613 . 22 0294998 OSCEOLA COUNTY SECTION 8 2000 - 12 - 22 0294999 PALMER TRAILER PARK 267 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 267 . 00 0295000 PITTMAN , CATHERINE & FLORIDA 2000 - 12 - 22 0295001 POLLY , EMMA 34 . 00 2000 - 12 - 22 884 . 00 January 9 , 2001 J i � pu 45 k CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0295002 PIERSON , JOHN H DSA 2000 - 12 - 22 627 . 00 0295003 PALUMBO , LOUIS 2000 - 12 - 22 343 . 00 0295004 PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF 2000 - 12 - 22 405 . 22 0295005 REAGAN , WILLIE C 2000 - 12 - 22 271 . 00 0295006 RAUDENBUSH , ERNEST 2000 - 12 - 22 245 . 00 0295007 RICOTTI , RICARDO 2000 - 12 - 22 317 . 00 0295008 RIVER PARK PLACE 2000 - 12 - 22 5 , 179 . 00 0295009 ST FRANCIS MANOR 2000 - 12 - 22 4 , 266 . 00 0295010 SCROGGS , BETTY DAVIS 2000 - 12 - 22 318 . 00 0295011 SACCO , JACQUELINE AND / OR 2000 - 12 - 22 245 . 00 0295012 STEWART , REUBEN W 2000 - 12 - 22 455 . 00 0295013 STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY 2000 - 12 - 22 389 . 22 0295014 SANDY PINES 2000 - 12 - 22 5 , 125 . 00 0295015 SHELTON , ROBERT L 2000 - 12 - 22 423 . 00 0295016 STARCK , MICHAEL R 2000 - 12 - 22 207 . 00 0295017 STRIBLING , WILLIAM JR 2000 - 12 - 22 267 . 00 0295018 SUNDMAN , IVAN 2000 - 12 - 22 333 . 00 0295019 STIMELING , PAUL B OR MARGARET 2000 - 12 - 22 273 . 00 0295020 SARTAIN , CHARLES S & TELECIA 2000 - 12 - 22 215 . 00 0295021 TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING 2000 - 12 - 22 495 . 00 0295022 TUMLIN , TRACY N 2000 - 12 - 22 320 . 00 0295023 ULISKY , WILLIAM B OR MARLENE 2000 - 12 - 22 183 . 00 0295024 VERO MOBILE HOME PARK 2000 - 12 - 22 337 . 00 0295025 VERO FIRST CORPORATION 2000 - 12 - 22 11459 . 00 0295026 WILLIAMS , DEBRA WASHINGTON 2000 - 12 - 22 160 . 00 0295027 WILLIAMS , EDITH 2000 - 12 - 22 270 . 00 0295028 YORK , LILLY B 2000 - 12 - 22 189 . 00 0295029 YORK , DAVID 2000 - 12 - 22 378 . 00 0295030 ZANCA , LEONARD 2000 - 12 - 22 588 . 00 0295031 ACE PLUMBING , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 51 . 50 0295032 ACTION TRANSMISSION AND 2000 - 12 - 28 694 . 68 0295033 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE 2000 - 12 - 28 64 . 30 0295034 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2000 - 12 - 28 5 . 96 0295035 AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT ' L 2000 - 12 - 28 1 , 180 . 08 0295036 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 2000 - 12 - 28 204 . 81 0295037 A T & T 2000 - 12 - 28 46 . 06 0295038 ASHWORTH INC 2000 - 12 - 28 89 . 09 0295039 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2000 - 12 - 28 56 . 00 0295040 AMERICAN REPORTING 2000 - 12 - 28 174 . 00 0295041 ASSOCIATES , THE 2000 - 12 - 28 7 , 310 . 16 0295042 ALTO U S INC 2000 - 12 - 28 315 . 23 0295043 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2000 - 12 - 28 191 . 32 0295044 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2000 - 12 - 28 1 , 138 . 00 0295045 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2000 - 12 - 28 4 , 517 . 59 0295046 BREATHING AIR SYSTEMS DIVISION 2000 - 12 - 28 11603 . 00 0295047 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2000 - 12 - 28 208 , 426 . 66 0295048 BELLSOUTH 2000 - 12 - 28 28 , 542 . 47 0295049 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2000 - 12 - 28 51 . 90 0295050 BAKER EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING CO 2000 - 12 - 28 350 . 00 0295051 BARKER ELECTRIC 2000 - 12 - 28 2 , 370 . 00 0295052 BARLEY , ROLYNN PLATT 2000 - 12 - 28 500 . 00 0295053 B & S SOD INC 2000 - 12 - 28 320 . 00 0295054 BIOMASS PROCESSING 2000 - 12 - 28 89 , 653 . 33 0295055 BITTNER , GERALD JOHN 2000 - 12 - 28 3 , 200 . 00 0295056 BELLSOUTH 2000 - 12 - 28 429 . 65 0295057 CAMP , DRESSER & MCKEE , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 25 , 956 . 10 January 9 , 2001 6 3i0No04b CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0295056 CENTRAL WINDOW OF 2000 - 12 - 28 165 . 00 0295059 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 2000 - 12 - 28 21 . 00 0295060 COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR , INC 2000 - 12 - 2B 105 . 44 0295061 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC 2000 - 12 - 28 12 , 508 . 71 0295062 CORBIN , SHIRLEY E 2000 - 12 - 28 45 . 50 0295063 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 2000 - 12 - 28 27 , 097 . 69 0295064 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY 2000 - 12 - 28 543 . 68 0295065 COWBOY PLASTICS 2000 - 12 - 28 54 . 50 0295066 CLEARSHIELD OF INDIAN RIVER CO 2000 - 12 - 28 42 , 331 . 00 X995067 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2000 - 12 - 28 28 . 50 0295068 CITGO PETROLEUM CORP 2000 - 12 - 28 4 , 068 . 69 0295069 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 2000 - 12 - 28 88 . 53 0295070 DICKERSON - FLORIDA , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 47 . 63 0295071 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2000 - 12 - 28 11050 . 00 0295072 DADE PAPER COMPANY 2000 - 12 - 28 431 . 87 0295073 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2000 - 12 - 28 122 . 63 0295074 DILLARD , CASSIE 2000 - 12 - 28 41 . 20 0295075 DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC 2000 - 12 - 28 708 . 20 0295076 EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES 2000 - 12 - 28 136 . 00 0295077 E - FILLIATE INC 2000 - 12 - 28 11 . 22 0295078 EXPERT DIGITAL SOLUTIONS INC 2000 - 12 - 28 5 , 250 . 00 0295079 FEDEX 2000 - 12 - 28 85 . 70 0295080 FLORIDA COCA - COLA BOTTLING CO 2000 - 12 - 28 336 . 50 0295081 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2000 - 12 - 28 9 , 054 . 93 0295082 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT 2000 - 12 - 28 4 , 288 . 10 0295083 FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR 2000 - 12 - 28 95 . 00 0295084 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2000 - 12 - 28 78 . 64 0295085 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION 2000 - 12 - 28 20 , 000 . 00 0295086 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2000 - 12 - 28 233 . 42 0295087 FULLER , APRIL L 2000 - 12 - 28 45 . 06 0295088 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 53 . 10 0295089 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2000 - 12 - 28 63 . 50 0295090 GOVERNING 2000 - 12 - 28 15 . 00 0295091 GEAR FOR SPORTS 2000 - 12 - 28 2 , 109 . 83 0295092 GREENE , ROBERT E 2000- 12 - 28 1 , 916 . 67 0295093 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 2000 - 12 - 28 25 , 273 . 55 0295094 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2000 - 12 - 28 23 . 00 0295095 HELD , PATRICIA BARGO 2000 - 12 - 28 612 . 50 0295096 HACH COMPANY 2000 - 12 - 28 196 . 20 0295097 HARRIS SANITATION , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 61 , 337 . 98 0295098 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2000 - 12 - 28 15 . 00 0295099 HARTSFIELD , CELESTE L 2000 - 12 - 28 105 . 00 0295100 HUENEKE , ALISON 2000 - 12 - 28 585 . 68 0295101 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000 - 12 - 28 60 , 273 . 87 0295102 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 2000 - 12 - 28 11957 . 61 0295103 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000 - 12 - 28 125 . 00 0295104 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 212 . 70 0295105 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2000 - 12 - 28 45 . 72 0295106 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 641 . 94 0295107 INDIAN RIVER ALL - FAB , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 224 . 95 0295108 JAMEISON PUBLISHERS 2000 - 12 - 28 526 . 50 0295109 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2000 - 12 - 28 20 . 10 0295110 JLT INSURANCE SERVICES FKA 2000 - 12 - 28 1 , 350 . 00 0295111 JONES CHEMICALS , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 376 . 00 0295112 K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 2000 - 12 - 28 85 . 04 ' j T .OWE ' S COMPANIES , INC . 2000 - 12 - 28 738 . 79 January 9 , 2001 7 8 � II PGo07 CHECK CHECK CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT NUMBER 2000 - 12 - 28 433 . 35 0295114 L B SMITH , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 60 . 46 0295115 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2000 - 12 - 28 156 . 19 0295116 LESCO , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 266 . 55 0295117 MAXWELL PLUMBING , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 15f977 . 91 0295118 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2000 - 12 - 28 15 , 937 . 00 0295119 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & 2000 - 12 - 28 11000 . 00 0295120 MID - STATE MECHANICAL 2000 - 12 - 28 221 . 00 0295121 MOSBY INC 2000 - 12 - 28 129 . 00 0295122 MURPHY , DEBBIE 2000 - 12 - 28 212 . 32 0295123 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO - CONTROL _ 45 . 53 28 0295124 MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 72 . 05 0295125 MALLONEE , BRIAN 2000 - 12 - 28 247 . 58 0295126 MASON , JANICE 2000 - 12 - 28 191 , 639 . 17 0295127 NOLTE , DAVID C 2000 - 12 - 28 11795 . 84 0295128 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 2000 - 12 - 28 1 , 500 . 00 0295129 NICOSIA , ROGER J DO 2000 - 12 - 28 645 . 00 0295130 NATOA 2000 - 12 - 28 33 . 73 0295131 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2000 - 12 - 28 756 . 60 0295132 OFFICE DEPOT , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 109 . 50 0295133 PEPSI - COLA COMPANY 2000 - 12 - 28 81 . 95 0295134 PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE 2000 - 12 - 28 353 . 97 0295135 PORT CONSOLIDATED 2000 - 12 - 28 300 . 00 0295136 PARRISH , JAMES L PE 2000 - 12 - 28 694 . 00 0295137 PEAY ' S ELECTRIC 2000 - 12 - 28 600 . 00 0295138 PHARMCHEM LABORATORIES , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 250 . 70 0295139 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2000 - 12 - 26 586 . 00 0295140 PEGASUS TRAVEL 177 . 40 0295141 PARLIAMENTARY REPORTING , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 41 . 20 2000 - 12 - 28 0295142 PESHA , JESSICA 2000 - 12 - 28 196 . 40 0295143 PORTACEL , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 91500 . 00 0295144 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2000 - 12 - 28 120 . 00 0295145 RODDENBERRY , WALLACE E ( GENE ) 2000 - 12 - 28 475 . 00 0295146 ROY CLARK 2000 - 12 - 28 24 . 00 0295147 RAPD , PAMELA 2000 - 12 - 28 13 . 06 0295148 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET 2000 - 12 - 28 241 . 50 0295149 SCOTT ' S SPORTING GOODS 2000 - 12 - 28 150 . 00 0295150 SEBASTIAN , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 28 41676 . 75 0295151 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE 2000 - 12 - 28 209 . 25 0295152 SHERWIN - WILLIAMS CO 2000 - 12 - 28 466 . 60 0295153 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING , 104 . 46 0295154 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 13 , 721 . 47 0295155 STATE ATTORNEY 19TH CIRCUIT 2000 - 12 - 28 150 . 00 2000 - 12 - 28 0295156 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2000 - 12 - 28 516 . 00 0295157 SIGNS IN A DAY 2000 - 12 - 28 66 . 00 0295158 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 390 . 50 0295159 SELIG CHEMICAL IND January 9 , 2001 K 0 i i U o , U CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE AMOUNT 0295160 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2000 - 12 - 26 358 . 64 0295161 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 2000 - 12 - 28 11040 . 36 0295162 SPORT - HALEY INC 2000 - 12 - 28 677 . 76 0295163 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO 2000 - 12 - 28 174 . 57 0295164 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF 2000 - 12 - 28 50 . 00 0295165 SMITH , FRAN 2000 - 12 - 28 910 . 17 0295166 SHEPARD ' S 2000 - 12 - 28 615 . 00 0295167 SEVERN - TRENT - AVATAR UTILITY 2000 - 12 - 28 761 . 65 0295168 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2000 - 12 - 28 50 . 00 0295169 SAVE THE MOMENT 2000 - 12 - 28 44 . 00 0295170 TEN - 8 FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 11 , 145 . 47 0295171 TITLEIST 2000 - 12 - 28 749 . 28 0295172 TOM FITE AIR CONDITIONING 2000 - 12 - 28 51293 . 00 0295173 TRAVEL BY PEGASUS 2000 - 12 - 28 1 , 237 . 50 0295174 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF 2000 - 12 - 28 69 . 35 0295175 U . S . COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS INC 2000 - 12 - 28 96 . 45 0295176 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 28 21499 . 55 0295177 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 28 9 , 458 . 37 0295178 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 28 166 . 00 0295179 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 28 1 , 683 . 74 0295180 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2000 - 12 - 28 170 , 000 . 00 0295181 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2000 - 12 - 28 130 . 00 0295182 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2000 - 12 - 28 600 . 50 0295183 WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC 2000 - 12 - 28 254 . 70 0295184 W W GRAINGER INC 2000 - 12 - 28 205 . 67 0295185 WIRELESS SYSTEMS GROUP , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 375 . 93 0295186 YAVORSKY ' S TRUCK SERVICE , INC 2000 - 12 - 28 12 . 56 0295187 LICARI , LINDA 2000 - 12 - 28 2 , 000 . 00 0295188 CARLEY , MORRIS G . 2000 - 12 - 28 105 . 42 1 , 221 , 535 . 07 7. D. Appointment of Belli Mitch eXPerez to Public Library Advisory Board (P LAB (Replace Kathleen Bishop ) The Board reviewed a memo of January 3 , 2001 : January 9 , 2001 9 $ PG or 24 To : Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date : January 3 , 2001 Subject: PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD (P.L.A.B.) APPOINTMENT From : Kenneth R. Macht Commissioner Kathleen Bishop had been serving on the P . L . AB . as a Member-at-Large. She resigned from her position as Executive Director of the Sebastian River Chamber of Commerce and has been replaced by Beth Mitchell-Perez. I would like to appoint Beth to serve as a Member-at-Large for the Public Library Advisory Board. Attachment : Beth Mitchell -Perez Resume ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the member- at- large appointment of Beth Mitchell - Perez to the Public Library Advisory Board , as requested . 7. E. Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost Share Addendum 4 to the Conceptual Approval Agreement for Oyster Bar Salt Marsh LAAO Site The Board reviewed a memorandum of December 18 , 2000 : TO : James E . Chandler County Administrator DE TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE : Robert M . Keating, AICP Community Development irector January 9 , 2001 10 PG 5a FROi`I : Roland M . DeBly AI�CPP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE : December 18 , 2000 RE : Board Approval of Florida Communities Trust Cost-Share Agreement Extension Addendum for Oyster Bar Salt Marsh LAAC Site It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 9 , 2001 . DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Attached, for the Board ' s approval consideration, is "Addendum 4 to Conceptual Approval Agreement " relating to the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh, a County/Florida Communities Trust (FCT) environmental land acquisition cost-share project. The proposed addendum, already approved by the FCT, will extend the grant project deadline six months beyond the current grant expiration date of January 27 , 2001 . Status of Project On November 7 , 2000 , the Board of County Commissioners approved purchase contracts with two of the key landowners in the project (Simmons and Andre ) . A six month extension will allow for closing of those two contracts , and will allow negotiations to continue regarding other landowners in the project . RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to execute the attached agreement addendum for the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh LAAC project . ATTACHMFNT • "Addendum 4 to the Conceptual Approval Agreement" for the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh project . ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the proposed Addendum 4 extending the Conceptual Approval Agreement to July 27 , 2001 for the Ovster Bar Salt Marsh LAAC project , as recommended in the memorandum . ADDENDUM 4 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE 01 ' THE CLERK TO TME BOARD January 9 , 2001 11 Cb ! 7. F. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver or Old Orchid Phase 2 PD (Planned Develo�nment) Kennedy Properties of Indian River, Inc The Board reviewed a memorandum of January 2 , 2001 : TO : James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . , Public Works Direct AND Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , P . E . , County Enginee FROM : David B . Cox, P . E . , Civil Engineer SUBJECT : Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Old Orchid Phase 2 P . D . REFERENCE : PD -00- 10- 18 / LDP Application No . 98010081 -26031 DATE : January 2 , 2001 CONSENT AGENDA DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Knight , McGuire & Associates , Inc . , on behalf of Kennedy Properties of Indian River, Inc . , the developers of Old Orchid Phase 2 P . D . , has requested a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement of Section 930 . 07 (2 ) (d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance . Old Orchid Phase 2 P . D . received preliminary plat approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 24, 2000 . The 7 . 53 acre project is located on the barrier island alone the east side of Jungle Trail, a quarter mile north of CR 510 . The site is located in special flood hazard area Zone AE with base flood elevation of 8 . 0 ft. N. G . V . D . The ten vear stillwater elevation is 4 . 8 ft . The proposed displacement of the floodplain below 4 . 8 ft . For which the waiver is requested is 667 cubic yards as indicated in the attached letter from the application ' s engineer dated August 16 , 2000 . AL TFRNATIVFS AND ANALYSIS The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided in Section 930 . 07(2 )(d ) 1 . Of being situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the Indian River and in staff' s opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance requirements can be met without adverse impact on other lands in the estuarine environment . Alternative No 1 Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request . January 9 , 2001 12 Pb r52 Alternative No . Deme the waiver request and require re- design to accomplish an on - site balance of cut and fill . RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of Alternative No . I ATTACHMENTS 1 . Letter from David S . Knight, P . E . , dated August 16, 2000 . ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the cut and fill balance waiver request ( Alternative No . 1 ) , as recommended in the memorandum . 7. G. Approval of Expenditures from the Emergency Management Performance Grant The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 2 , 2001 : TO : Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH : Douglas Wright, Director Department of Emergency Services FROM : Nathan McCollum, Emergency Management Coordinator / ;^ — Department of Emergency Services DATE : January 2 , 2001 SUBJECT : Approval of Expenditures from the Emergency Management Performance Grant On September 12 , 2000, the Board approved the State Funded Sub-grant Agreement (contract number 01 CP- 04- 10-40-01 -031 ) which provides state and federal disaster preparedness funding . This year, the agreement included the Emergency Management Preparedness Agreement (EMPA) and the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG), formally known as the State & Local Agreement . January 9 , 2001 13 The September 12 , 2000, approved agreement included funding in the amount of $ 106, 090 . 00 for salaries and benefits from the EMPA. It did not include the EMPG funding because the United States Congress had not approved the 2001 budget . We have received notice from the Florida Division of Emergency Management that the EMPG funding has been passed by Congress and is now available for county emergency management expenditures . The funding now available is $32 ,256 . 00 from EMPG and $ 1 , 519 . 00 from balance ofEMPA . Total funding available is $33 , 775 . 00 . The following is a list of items earmarked for this agreement which will further enhance the Emergency Management Division ' s ability to adequately respond to and recover from disaster events: Digital Copier/Printer/Imager ( State Contract ) $ 14 ,200 . 00 EOC Wireless Computer Network $ 37000 . 00 EM 2000 Computer Network Upgrades $ 1 , 500 . 00 Video Conference Equipment $ 4 , 950 . 00 Required Emergency Management Conference Travel $ 61800 . 00 Required Emergency Management Conference Regist . $ 11500 . 00 Graphics Computer & Printer $ 1 , 825 . 00 Total $ 331775 . 00 Salaries are used as the county match for the EMPG. Therefore, no additional county funds are needed . RECOMMENDATION : Staff recommends approval of the above listed expenditures for the Emergency Management Performance Grant . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . .Award letter from Department of Community Affairs/Division of Emergency Management ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved the expenditures totaling $ 33 , 775 . 00 , as listed in the above memorandum and recommended by staff. January 9 , 2001 14 e P' u 6j4 7. H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 007 The Board reN iev ed a Memorandum of JaIluary 3 . 200 1 : TO : Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE : January 3 , 2001 SUBJECT : Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 007 THROUGH : Joseph A . Baird Assistant County Administrator FROM : Jason E . Brown ✓ Budget Manager Description And Conditions The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following : 1 . On December 12 , 2000 , the Board of Commissioners approved an EMS County Awards grant for FY 2000/2001 . This grant , totaling $43 , 883 . 29 , requires no additional County funding . The attached entry appropriates these funds . 2 . During FY 1999/2000 , the Board of Commissioners approved the use of an outside negotiator for the union contracts . Since the negotiations carried over into the current year, it is necessary to move these funds forward . The attached entry approrpaites funds from General Fund contingencies . 3 . On June 13 , 2000 , the Board of Commissioners approved an interlocal agreement with the City of Fellsmere for renovating the Old Fellsmere School Building . Pursuant to the agreement, Fellsmere has transferred $ 116 , 127 from donations to the County . The attached entry appropriates these funds . 4 . Due to rising advertising costs and higher vacancies , the Personnel Department needs more funding for placing job position announcements . The attached entry appropriates funding of $4 , 000 from General Fund contingencies . 5 . On January 2 , 2001 , the Board of Commissioners approved a collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters for EMS employees . The contract provides for a 3 % COLA increase for all bargaining unit personnel . Emergency Services District contingency provides funding in the amount of $ 92 , 651 . 6 . Due to higher workloads in the Planning and Building Divisions , an additional full time Planning Technician is needed . The attached entry appropriates funding from Municipal Service Taxing Unit ( M . S . T . U . ) Contingencies . Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment . January 9 , 2001 15 Bf 1dn L655 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge . SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously approved budget amendment 007 , as recommended in the memorandum . TO : Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 007 of County Commissioners — FROM : Jason E . Brown ( " I DATE : January 3 2001 Budget Manager Entry Fund/Dej artment/ Number Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1 . REVENUES EMERGENCY SERVICES DIST . / EMS County Awards Grant 114-000- 334-290 . 00 $43 , 884 $ 0 EXPENSES EMERGENCY SERVICES DIST. / Advanced Life Support/ Software 114-253- 526-035 . 12 $500 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DIST. / Advanced Life Support/ Office Equip . 114-253- 526-066 . 41 $2, 563 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DIST. / Advanced Life Support/ EDP Equip . 114-253-526-066 . 47 $ 1 , 300 $0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DIST. / Advanced Life Support/ Misc. Equip . 114-253-526-066 . 49 $ 39 , 521 $ 0 2 . EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Other Professional Services 001 -203 - 513-033 . 19 $ 13 , 250 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies 001 - 199- 581 -099 . 91 $0 $ 13 , 250 3 . REVENUES OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL FUND/ Contributions 325-000-337-071 . 00 $ 116 , 127 $ 0 EXPENSES OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL FUND/ Building Improvements 325- 129-519-066 . 29 $ 116 , 127 $0 4. EXPENSES GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Advertising 001 -203- 513-034 . 81 $4 , 000 $ 0 GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for Contingencies 001 - 199- 581 -099 . 91 $ 0 $4 , 000 January 9 , 2001 t X56 16 TO : Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT : 007 of County Commissioners FROM : Jason E . Brown �, DATE : January 3 2001 Budget Manager i F Fund/Deportment/ r Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease EXPENSES EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ Regular Salaries 114-253- 526-011 . 12 $439453 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ Overtime 114-253- 526-011 . 14 $269072 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ Social Security 114-253-526-012 . 11 $4 , 311 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ Retirement 114-253- 526-012 . 12 $ 14 , 106 $0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ Worker' s Comp . 114-253-526-012 . 14 $ 3 ,476 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ Medicare Matching 114-253- 526-012 . 17 $ 1 , 008 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ insurance 114-253- 526-012 . 13 $ 225 $ 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT/ ALS/ Contingencies 114-253- 526-099 . 91 $ 0 $ 92 , 651 6 . EXPENSES MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/ Planning/ Salaries 004-205- 515-011 . 12 $ 129954 $ 0 MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/ Planning/ Social Security 004-205-515-012 . 11 $ 803 $ 0 MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/ Planning/ Retirement 004-205- 515-012 . 12 $ 1 , 185 $ 0 MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/ Planning/ Insurance 004-205- 515-012 . 13 $ 37850 $ 0 MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/ Planning/ Worker's Comp . 004-205- 515-012 . 14 $43 $0 MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/ Planning/ Medicare Matching 004-205-515-012 . 17 $ 188 $ 0 MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT/ Reserve for Contingencies 004- 199- 581 -099 . 91 $ 0 $ 199023 January 9 , 2001 17 1 0 PG 6 �J 7- L Award of Bid #3034 to Florida Institute of Technology Artificial Reef Fish Census Proiect The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 2 , 2001 : TO : James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . Public Works Directo THROUGH : Jeffrey R . Tabar , P . / Coastal Engineer FROM : Jonathan C . Gorham , Ph . D .�� Environmental Analyst SUBJECT : AWARD OF BID # 3034 — Florida Institute of Technology Artificial Reef Fish Census Project DATE : January 2 , 2001 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 3 , 2000 , during the Board of County Commission regular meeting , the Board approved a $ 20 , 000 Grant Agreement with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ( FWCC ) for reef fish population censuses of the County ' s artificial reefs constructed in 1999 . These censuses will comprise the first year ' s effort of a multi - year research project to evaluate the effects of different levels of fishing pressure on the fish populations of artificial reefs . Bids were received on November 22 , 2000 as follows : Vendor Total Bid Adventure Environmental , Inc . , Key Largo $ 13 , 000 Florida Institute of Technology , Melbourne $ 19 , 950 Budget $ 20 , 000 ALTERNATIVES 6 ANALYSIS Following the bid opening , it became apparent that Florida Institute of Technology possessed superior qualifications to complete the project . The selection of Florida Institute of January 9 , 2001 Technology is in the best interest of the County . To successfu _ _ v execute the scope of work in the Grant Agreement requ . re considerable expertise in fist, census , na techniques , expe = ent - desiat: , and statistical analysis . The principal investigator frog. Florida Institute of Technology Jonathan N. . Shenker , Ichthyologist with over 50 publications in the field , and has the institutional support of a major university . In contrast , the low bidder , Adventure Environmental , is essentially a commercial diving firm with no fish census experience in the marine sciences . Florida Institute of Technology had included in its original bid costs for equipment that the County had intended to purchase directly . Staff has contacted Florida Institute of Technology and prepared a change order that reflects a reduction in cost by $ 5589 , resulting in a total revised cost of 14 , 361 . A letter of acceptance is attached from Florida Institute of Technology . RECOWIPNDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends the bid be awarded to Florida Institute of Technology and approval of Change Order No . l , resuit , in a total revised cost of $ 14 , 361 . FWCC staff concurs with the recommendation of county staff ( See Attached Letter ) . Funding is from the Beach Restoration Fund 128 - 144 - 572 , with reimbursement from FWCC under Grant Agreement FWC - 00097 . ATTACHMENT FIT Letter dated December 21 , 2000 to J . Tabar from J . Shenker FDEP Letter dated December 13 , 2000 to J . Gorham from J . Dodrill Bid Tabulation Contract Change Order No . l ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously awarded Bid # 3034 to Florida Institute of Technology for an artificial reef fish census project, and approved Change Order No . 1 , resulting in a total revised cost of $ 14 , 361 , as recommended in the memorandum . CONTRACT/GRANT AGREEMENT NO . FWCC -00097 . COPY OF ITEMIZED BID SCHEDULE ( EXHIBIT ' - A " TO CONTRACT) , AND COPY OF CHANGE ORDER NO . 1 ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD January 9 , 2001 19 BK $ oP6b 'i 7. J. Award of Bid #3019 - Sea Systems Corn Artificial ReeMrvey Project The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 2 , 2001 : TO : James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E , Public Works Director THROUGH : Jeffrey R . Tabar , P . / Coastal Enaineer 1/ FROM : Jonathan C . Gorham , Ph . D .�j Environmental Analyst vi SUBJECT : AWARD OF BID # 3019 - Sea Systems Corp . Artificial Reef Survey Project DATE : January 2 , 2001 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On January 4 , 2000 , during the Board of County Commission regular meeting , the Board approved a 510000 Grant Agreement with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Consery f000 Commission ( FWCC ) for a side scan sonar survey of the County ' s artificial reef sites . These surveys will be used to map the three artificial reef sites ( each one square mile in size ) and to accurately record the locations and configurations of the seven artificial reefs deployed therein . Bids were received on November 15 , 2000 as follows : Vendor Coastal Systems Internati Total Bid onal , oral Gables 535 , 025 Sea Systems Corp . , Pompano Beach $ 7 , 500 ARC Surveying and Mapping , Jacksonville $ 76r088 Spartan Underwater Technologies Inc . , Panama City $ 31 , 014 Morgan and Eklund Inc . , Wabasso $ 12 , 075 George F . Young Inc . , St . Petersburg $ 33f715 Budget $ 10 , 000 January 9 , 2001 20 H _ 14io60 RECOMEMATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommend the bid be awarded tc Sea Systems Corp . Fundinc is from the Beach Restoration Fund 12R - 144 - 572 , with reimbursement from FWCC under Grant Agreement FWC - 9QC53 . ATTACHMENT Bid Tabulation Contract ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge . SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously awarded Bid # 3019 to Sea Systems Corp . , in the amount of $ 7 , 500 , for the artificial reef survey project , as recommended in the memorandum . CONTRACT/GRANT AGREEMENT NO . FWCC - 99053 AND COPY OF ITEMIZED BID SCHEDULE ( EXHIBIT " A " TO CONTRACT) ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - JACK LARGE4 TRUSTEE - REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ( PD ) SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR RIVER ISLAND (Legislative ) PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of December 27 , 2000 using a location map , an aerial view , and the preliminary PD plan to enhance his presentation : TO : James E . Chandler County Administrator D N HEAD CONCURRENCE : Obert M . Keating, ACCP Community Development irector � '4 . FROM : Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director January 9 , 2001 21 DATE : December 27 , 2000 SUBJECT : Jack Large, Trustee ' s Request for Planned Development ( PD) Special Exception Use Approval for River Island It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 9 , 2001 . DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS : Mosbv & Associates , Inc . , on behalf of Jack Large , Trustee , has requested planned development ( PD ) special exception use and preliminary PD plan/plat approval for a project to be known as "River Island" . The site is located between the Durrance Development subdivision and the Indian River Lagoon, south of the River Boat Club subdivision and 95 ' Street . The site currently contains several single- family and multi - family residences that total 12 rental units . This single phase project proposes removal of all existing residential structures and creation of 1 single- family lot and 5 duplex lots for a total of 11 residences on 6 lots . The existing roadway that serves the site and surrounding properties will remain but be improved with this project . The applicant is requesting PD approval to obtain lot size , lot width, sidevard setback , and right-of-way width waivers to accommodate redevelopment of the site within the existing physical constraints of the site ( access , east/west width , proximity to the lagoon, and proximity to an existing navigable canal ) . • PD Project Process The process involved in review and approval of this proposal is as follows : Approval Needed Reviewing Bodv 1 . Conceptual Plan/ Special Exception PZC & BCC 2 . Preliminary PD PZC 3 . Land Development Permit ( LDP ) or Waiver Staff 4 . Final PD (plat) BCC The applicant has requested approval of the first two steps . If the Board of County Commissioners approves the request, then the applicant ' s next step will be to obtain from Public Works an LDP or LDP waiver for required PD improvements . • Planning and Zoning Commission Action At its meeting of December 14 , 2000 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 - 0 to recommend that the Board approve the special exception request with conditions ( see attachment #4) . Those recommended conditions are incorporated into staffs recommendation as it appears at the end of this report . The Planning and Zoning Commission also approved the preliminary PD plan/plat subject to Board approval of the special exception request . January 9 , 2001 6 2 • Board of County Commissioners Consideration The Board is now to consider the special exception use request and is to take action to approve , approve with conditions , or deny the use request . If the Board approves the special exception request, then the Planning and Zoning Commissions preliminary PD plan/plat approval will become effective . ANALYSIS : 1 . Size of PD Area : 1 . 88 acres 2 . Zoning Classification : RM - 6 , Residential Multi -Family ( up to 6 units/acre ) 3 , Land Use Designation : L - 2 , Low Density Residential 2 ( up to 6 units/acre ) 4 . Density : Allowed : up to 6 unitsiacre Proposed : 5 . 85 units acre 5 , Open Space : Required : 40% Provided : 56 % 6 . Surrounding Land Use and Zoning : North : Residential , River Boat Club , Pelican Pomle/R,M - 6 South : Residential/R.M - 6 East : Indian River Lagoon West : Navigable Canal , Durrance DevelopmentlRM - 6 7, Traffic Circulation : Currently , the site is accessed from 95 ' Street via an existing unpaved roadway ( "52nd Court" ) which traverses the subject site and extends south of the subject site to access existing residences located south of the project site . The project proposes to pave 52 "d Court from the south boundary of the subject site to 95 `d Street ( currently paved ) to establish a platted right -of-wav for 52 "d court over the subject site , and to document access easement rights for the portion of 52 "d Court that lies between the north boundary of the project site and the eastern terminus of 95 `h Street . Thus , the project proposal will improve an existing access roadway and formalize access rights over most of 52 "d Court . Traffic Engineering has approved the proposed access improvement plan . Prior to or via the final plat, formal access rights for adjacent property owners must be established from the eastern terminus of 95 `h Street to the southern boundary of the subject site . Also , prior to issuance of a certificate of completion for the project, 52nd Court must be paved from 95 ' Street to the southern boundary of the subject site . 8, Stormwater Management : Currently, there is no stormwater system to handle and treat run - off from the site ' s existing development . The project proposes to use a Miami curb system to convey road run-off into the project site , and all residential structures will be elevated on stilts . Within the area of the proposed lots , a stormwater management area will be established whereby stormwater run -off will be held around and underneath the elevated structures to allow percolation . To ensure containment of the run -off, site grading will create a shallow basin around and under the units ( the stormwater management area ) . To ensure percolation within this basin, significant amounts of the site ' s existing soils will be removed and replaced with fine sand . This stormwater management plan is subject to SJRWMD permitting and issuance of a county Type "B " stormwater management permit . January 9 , 2001 23 kb b6 9 . Utilities : The project will be served by county water and sewer service . Utility Services and Environmental Health have approved provision of those services . 10. Waivers : Because the project proposes creation of platted lots , a formal right-of- way and setbacks from lot lines must be established . Due to constraints regarding the physical location of 52nd Court and the fairly narrow east-west width of the site, a waiver from the standard right-of-way width is justified. Also , because the site is zoned for multi - family development and units may be attached (0 ' sidevard setback ) and arranged in a compact fashion without PD approval , the proposed lot size and setback waivers are reasonable . RS -6 Standard Proposed River Island PD Right-of- Way Width 50 ' 40' ( Miami curbing) Minimum Lot Width 70 ' 47 . 6 ' to 79 . 9 ' Minimum Duplex Lot Size 12 , 000 sq . ft . 7 , 883 sq . ft to 13 , 860 sq . ft . Minimum Lot 10 ' 5 ' Sidevard Setback Frontyard Setback 25' 25 ' Rear-yard Setback 25 ' 25 ' Maximum Densitv 6 units/acre 5 . 85 units/acre 11 . Public Benefits : In return for the requested waivers, the applicant will be able to redevelop a "grandfathered" site that has numerous setback and development non-conformities in a manner consistent with the site ' s multi - family zoning. These redevelopment improvements will upgrade the site and adjacent properties and will address site run-off which is currently not addressed . Also , through the PD process, the PD will prohibit docks and observation piers along the site ' s lagoon frontage, which will result in less physical and visual impact on the lagoon than could otherwise occur under a conventional application request ( e. g . site plan or subdivision) . 12 . Recreation Area and Pedestrian Improvements : Because fewer than 60 units are proposed, no PD recreation area requirements apply, and no common recreation area is proposed. A 4' wide sidewalk is proposed along the site ' s 52nd Court frontage and will extend north to connect to the existing 95 'h Street sidewalk. This improvement satisfies the PD pedestrian path requirement for this project . 13 . Dedication and Improvements : The proposed 52nd Court right-of- way and streetlight improvements will be the responsibility of a private property owners association . 14 . Concurrency : The applicant has signed a concurrency acknowledgment agreement which fulfills the concurrency requirements for site plan approval . The applicant will be required to apply for and obtain a concurrency certificate prior to building permit issuance . January 9 , 2001 74 8 I _ b €gib !? 15 . Environmental Issues : Some jurisdictional wetlands exist next to the site ' s lagoon shoreline, but no development is proposed in that area with this project . No negative impacts are anticipated . There is a lagoon shoreline buffer requirement of 50 ' or 2010 lot depth , whichever is less . The 20% lot depth applied to this site would result in a lagoon setback of approximately 25 . However, the PD plan proposes to exceed this requirement by establishing a 30' wide shoreline protection buffer . Also , to protect lagoon area and grassbeds from the impacts of lengthy docks , staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission have recommended, and the applicant has agreed , to prohibit docks and observation piers along the site ' s lagoon shoreline . Lot owners will have an opporttmity to construct parallel docks along the navigable canal that lines the west side of each lot. The lagoon dock and observation pier prohibition needs to be made a condition of PD approval and noted on the final plat . 16 . Buffers and Setbacks : As previously noted , a special shoreline protection buffer is being provided . The 25 ' PD perimeter buffer is satisfied along the perimeters , with the exception of the northern perimeter of Lot 1 . Along the north side of Lot 1 , either a 25 ' building setback needs to be provided or the abutting parcel to the north must be brought under the project "umbrella" by being encumbered by the same restrictive covenants and under the same homeowners ' association as the PD project area, as provided for in PD ordinance section 915 . 16( 1 )( A) . Prior to or via the final plat either the 25 ' building setback or restrictive covenants/PD homeownersassociation allowance must be provided for. RECOMMENDATION : Based on the above analysis , staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant PD special exception use approval and approval of the requested waivers with the following conditions : 1 . That the 25 ' perimeter PD setback be established along the northern border of Lot 1 or that, prior to or via the final plat, the parcel immediately north of Lot 1 be encumbered by the same restrictive covenants and under the same homeowner ' s association as the PD project area per PD ordinance section 915 . 16( 1 )(A) . 2 . That docks and observation piers be prohibited along the site ' s lagoon frontage with an allowance for such structures parallel to the canal frontage of each lot . Such prohibition shall be referenced on the final plat . 3 . That prior to or via the final plat, formal access rights for adjacent property owners shall be established from the southern boundary of the site to 95 " Street . 4 . That prior to issuance of a certificate of completion for the project, 52nd Court shall be paved and a sidewalk installed from the southern boundary of the site to 95 " S treet. ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Application 2 . Location Map 3 . Preliminary PD Plan 4 . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes (unapproved ) 5 . PD Ordinance Section 915 . 16( 1 )( A) January 9 , 2001 7j Bt( P 6 6 5) Director Boling responded to Commissioners ' questions concerning stormwater management , size of buildings , setbacks , and areas of green space . He offered comparisons of what could be built in multi - family zoning districts with an RM - 6 site plan versus what is permitted under a PD . In addition , he specified that extra buffering would be required with the PD . He pointed out that any redevelopment of this site would probably be of benefit whether it were a PD or a site plan project . Community Development Director Robert M . Keating commented that other benefits . such as the replacement of the septic tanks by public sewer system and elimination of setback non - conformities and mobile homes , would also result . Commissioner Adams inquired whether the developer intends to build rental or condominium units . Director Boling advised that the developer would have to address that question , since the application does not cover that . He did mention that the developer ' s current plan could change over the life of the project . Chairman Ginn questioned the wisdom of approving structures on stilts . The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter . Ira Hatch . a local attorney representing homeowners Durrance and the River Boat Club Subdivisions , all single- family homes , presented for the record a copy of a petition signed by 42 River Boat Club homeowners requesting the Board reject the application , reverse the ruling of the Planning and Zoning Commission , and maintain the RM- 6 zoning for the subject property . ( The copy of the petition has been placed on file with the backup for the meeting in the office of the Clerk to the Board . ) His clients favored redevelopment of the property but had concerns that standing water under the stilt homes would attract January 9 , 2001 1i €� 6 _ 6 unwanted wildlife including snakes . The \ , believed a separate stormwater management area would be at least controllable . Ile felt a dangerous precedent could be set if they alloxythe same land to be used for storinwater management and building purposes which could result in a significant increase in density throughout the county . He objected to the density of the property pointing out specific areas on a site map where the canal was used to increase that density . He pointed out that the County had riparian rights in the River Boat Club under an agreement . He opined it was inappropriate to use the canal for purposes of calculating density requirements . He cited the Brickell case and the Coastal Petroleum case in the Florida Supreme Court which address these issues . If the canal was navigable in 1845 , then it would be considered navigable waters and title to the underlying land would belong to the State of Florida ( Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund ) and not to the developers . He felt that this was , at least , an issue . Finally . it was represented that there are 12 units now on the property and there are currently only 9 electrical meters . Also , several of the units are hotel units , not single - family or multi - family residences . He felt the reduction of density argument was flawed , because he thought this proposal would increase the density , traffic , and the burden on the environmentally sensitive neighborhood . He hoped the developer would come back with a site plan to put a nice development on the property with separate on - site stormwater management . He urged the Board to not allow this over- use of the property ; it overburdens the land and the stormwater management system is completely unacceptable . He also pointed out that the developer was claiming ownership of submerged lands , but the title to property adjusts with the high water line . The submerged land should be deducted from their calculations and the buffer setbacks should be measured from the ordinary high water line of the river . Randy Mosby , Mosby and Associates , responded to concerns of the Commissioners and comments of Mr . Hatch . He felt the big issue of stormwater management resulted from January 9 , 2001 27 A 6 bpi a lack of understanding how the system works . He explained that this property is in a flood plain . This system has been used in both Brevard and St . Lucie Counties . The structures are elevated by piles above the flood plain requirements . Fill requirements are minimized . The key to the success of this system is recovery ; that is how quickly you can recover from a storm event and get rid of the water . There are no ponds or ponding waters under a structure . This has been submitted to St . Johns River Water Management District and they have no significant problem with the concept . The SJRWMD ' s final comments are presently in his office awaiting the outcome of this public hearing to finalize their land development permit ( LDP ) drawings for submission to the County ' s Engineering Department . He pointed out that it is not unusual to have master electrical meters and that the number of meters does not necessarily correlate with the number of people presently living there . He advised that the lots and the structures on the lots will be sold , this will not be set up like a multi - family complex . He still has regulatory agents ' requirements to satisfy as well as working with the County ' s Engineering Department , which is probably now more detailed than SJRWMD . Those permit applications cannot be submitted until they know they have an approved PD . Commissioner Adams requested the width measurements on the lots , and Mr . Mosby oo responded that Lot 1 is 45 . 32 ' ; Lot 2 is 50 ' : Lot 3 at the western edge is 58 . 6 ' and eastern edge is 49 ' ; Lot 4 is 57 ' at the western edge and 49 ' at the eastern edge ; Lot 5 is 49 ' at the eastern and 57 ' at the western edge ; Lot 6 is 74 ' at the eastern edge and 118 ' at the western edge . He explained that the canal width at 52 " Court varies from 39 to roughly 42 feet . Responding to Chairman Ginn ' s question , Mr . Mosby advised that the width of property froin the edge of the roadway to the canal is roughly about 10 feet . Vice Chairman Stanbridge inquired which agencies still require permitting , and Mr . Mosby responded the Department of Environmental Protection , SJRWMD , and the County . He then advised of the SJRWMD comments to which they will respond as soon as they January 9 , 2001 I € a68 28 submit their LDP drawings to Engineerin .Y . Jack Large . 5628 Cypress Creek Drive . Grant . addressed Commissioner Adams ' concerns about square footage of the structures because of the narrow lots . He advised that the two narrower lots were already platted and in existence . The other lots will have duplexes each approximately 20 feet wide . He stated that a lot of town homes and unique and spacious designs can result as long as it is done properly . The entire house . including the garage , will be elevated . The whole structure will be on a bridge - type concept foundation . Each unit will probably have about 1 , 800 square feet , of two - story air- conditioned space . The reason for this concept , instead of going to amulti - family condominium project , is to keep the ambience that exists nearby . A multilevel common wall condominium project does not fit . They also want to continue with the Key West or Bermudian look . He mentioned that the house to the south is built on stilts . The objective has been to blend in . He thought it would be possible to toNvn - home a duplex and sell each one separately . They have not explored that option yet , but they aim to make these structures look like single - family homes . Bob Fowler, 5100 95 " Street , Sebastian , advised lie is the president of the homeowners ' association of River Boat Club . They look forward to almost anything being built on the site . Two things bothered him : first was the developers ' lack of sensitivity to the homeowners . Second , they are asking for a special exception to reduce the setbacks on the sides of each lot . He told the Planning & Zoning Commission that allowing this PD will create one more lot and allow 5 - foot side setbacks . There are 10 foot setbacks on all the other homes in there . He asked the Board to " uphold the letter of the law . ' " Sheila Halpin owns the lot to the north of the project and resides at 1952 Quay Dock Road . She understood the developer could put a condominium building there . She had seen the plans , they are Key West style . She felt the developer ' s proposal would vastly improve January 9 , 2001 29 i� Pb the subject property and she was in favor of it . It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing . Vice Chairman Stanbridge had difficulty envisioning the height of this project , and Director Boling advised it could be built up 35 feet from the lowest structural point . Chairman Ginn was concerned about how the garage will look , and Mr . Large explained that strong foundations would be approximately 3 to 3 - 1 /2 feet above ground with a concrete floor for the cars . The soil under the structures will be removed and replaced with sand to provide for better percolation . He advised he had built stilt houses in St . Christopher Harbor in the 1970 ' s . Mr. Mosby added that the plan includes mounding up the driveway and the stormwater retention will be under and around the structure . MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin , SECONDED by Commissioner Adams for discussion , to approve staff' s recommendation . Under discussion , Commissioner Adams believed that a lot of the concerns relate to the actual site plan because the Board was unable to envision how it will look . Director Boling advised that another level of scrutiny in the process will be at the land development permit stage ; the elevation views will be required then . Engineering and drainage will be reviewed by Public Works later in the process . Public Works Director James W . Davis felt at this point it is a feasible concept from his point- of- view . The key is the soil exchange for well - draining soils . Staff and SJRWMD staff will review this aspect carefully and pay particular attention to a 3 - day storm event January 9 , 2001 J0 B I / U recover' . Commissioner Adams spoke about the canal on 95 "' being County owned and how the 52 "� Court right - of- way goes to the canal . She decreed the canal is a filthy , mucky mess , and pointed out that whatever is going into the river now cannot be good . She liked the idea of the sewers , but asked if there is anv way the County can require some kind of cleanliness in the canal that we do not have now . Deputy County Attorney Will Collins could not speak to the cleanliness of the canal , but did explain that the River Boat Club lots are entirely north of the right - of- way of 95 " Street . The canal is actually partially within the width of the right - of- way , that is why the County has some riparian rights there . In this case , the property lines of these lots extend beyond the road and into the canal , which was not the case in the River Boat Club , although on the north side of River Boat there is another canal and he thought some of those lot lines extend into the northern canal and some people have their docks on the north side and some have them on the 95 ' Street right- of- way . Commissioner Macht understood riparian rights were similar to an easement , and Attorney Collins responded that if you own property up to navigable water, then you have the right to use it for warfing , viewing , swimming , or whatever you want to do . In the case of 95 `h Street, the public , by the dedication of the road , actually owns the property adjacent to the water . We have licensed the River Boat Club to build some docks there in our public right- of- way . Riparian rights are a property right, but are appurtenant to the property ; they cannot be sold to someone else , they stay with the property that abuts the water . Vice Chairman Stanbridge was concerned about the muck in the canal and that approval of this request would set a precedent . She would hate to see a proliferation of stilt houses everywhere Mr . Mosby can find good soils . Director Keating believed it would not set a precedent . He also explained that the January 9 , 2001 31 B , i 16 71 County has no regulations about a house having to be built on grade and there is no prohibition to building on pilings . There are houses on pilings in other projects and there have been many other instances of underground drainage , such as under parking lots . This IS unusual because drainage will be under structures . Chairman Ginn was opposed to using area for both requirements , drainage and open space . She did not see this project as a benefit nor how it fits in the PD regulations . For these reasons she could not support the motion . THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried 3 - 2 ( Chairman Ginn and Vice Chairman Stanbridge opposed ) . ( Staff s recommendation with all conditions as set out in the memorandum . ) Commissioner Adams stated that she expected the Commissionersconcerns to be addressed in the site planning processing . COPIES OF PETFLION PAGES ARE ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR THE MEETING IN THE OFFICE OF TFIF, CLERK TO THE BOARD 9 . A . 2 . PUBLIC HEARING - SMIGIEL PARTNERS XII LIMITED INC09S REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ( PD ) SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR LEGEND LAKES ( Legislative) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of January 2 . 2001 using the location map and preliminary PD plan for visual information : January 9 , 2001 32 1 16 P ' X72 TO : James E . Chandler Counry Administrator DIVI ' HEAD CONCURRENCE : � eMCP M . Keating, CP Community Development Director .7 Stan Boling , AICP Planning Director DATE : January 2 , 2001 SUBJECT : Smigiel Partners XII Limited , Inc. ' s Request for Planned Development (PD ) Special Exception Use Approval for Legend Lakes It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 9 . 2001 . DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS • Mosby & Associates , Inc . , on behalf of Smigiel Partners XII Limited, Inc . , has requested planned development (PD) special exception and preliminary PD plarvplat approval for a three phase single- family subdivision project to be known as "Legend Lakes " . The site is located west of 43 `" Avenue between Oslo Road ( 9"' Street SW) and 5 " Street SW, and is a citrus grove site . The applicant is seeking PD approval to obtain waivers from the minimum internal road right - of-way width and sidevard setbacks . The project proposes 164 single- family detached homes on individual lots that meet or exceed the RS -3 zoning district minimum lot width and lot size standards . • PD Project Process The process involved in review and approval of this proposal is as follows : Approval Needed ReviewinuBodv 1 . Conceptual Plan/Special Exception PZC & BCC 2 . Preliminary PD IPZC 3 . Land Development Permit (LDP ) or Waiver Staff 4 . Final PD (plat) BCC The applicant has requested approval of the first two steps . If the Board of County Commissioners approves the request , then the applicant ' s next step will be to obtain an LDP or LDP waiver from public works for the required PD improvements . • Planning and Zoning Commission Action At its meeting of December 14 , 2000 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the Board approve the special exception request with conditions ( see attachment January 9 , 2001 33 #4) . Those recommended conditions are incorporated into staff' s recommendation as it appears at the end of this report . The Planning and Zoning Commission also approved the preliminary PD plan/plat subject to Board approval of the special exception request . • Board of County Commissioners Consideration The Board is now to consider the special exception use request, and is to take action to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the use request. If the Board approves the special exception request, then the Planning and Zoning Commission ' s preliminary PD plan/plat approval will become effective . ANALYSIS • 1 . Size of PD Area : 79 . 0 acres Note: The 79 . 0 acre figure includes 0 . 6 acres to be donated to the county for Oslo Road right-of-way and 2 . 1 acres to be sold to the county for additional Oslo Road right -of- way . 2 . Zoning Classification : RS - 3 , Residential Single-Family (up to 3 units/acre) 3 . Land Use Designation : L - 1 , Low Density Residential ( up to 3 units/acre) 4. Density : Allowed : up to 3 . 0 units/acre Proposed : 2 . 15 units/ acre Note: The 2 . 13 units/acre figure is based upon the 76 . 3 acres of project area that will not be sold to the county as road right-of-way . 5 . Phasing : Three ( 3 ) development phases are proposed as follows : A . Phase I: 40 . 4 acres , 58 lots at 1 . 4 units acre Includes the southernmost portion of the project site, Oslo Road entrance, and entire stormwater and recreation tract areas . B . Phase IT 17 . 5 acres , 53 lots at 3 units/acre . Includes the middle portion of the project site . C . Phase III: 18 . 4 acres , 53 lots at 2 . 9 units/acre . — Includes northernmost portion of the project site and 5 " Street SW entrance . 6. Open Space : Required : 40% Provided : 40 . 8 % 7. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning : North : 5 `h Street SW , Proposed Greystone SD , Groves/RS - 3 , PD South : Oslo Road, Residential , Groves/RS - 3 , A- 1 East : Arbor Trace PD/RS -3 West : Citrus Springs PD/Project PD January 9 , 2001 B11 -y � 4 8 . Traffic Circulation : As required by the LDRs , a traffic impact analysis was prepared by the applicant and reviewed by Traffic Engineering . Traffic Engineering ' s review of that analvsis indicates that a westbound left - tum lane is required at the project ' s 5 " Street SW entrance in Phase III and that a westbound right - turn lane should be provided at the project ' s Oslo Road entrance in Phase III . Each of these entrances connects to an internal loop road that access short cul -de- sacs and individual lots . Both Traffic Engineering and Emergency Services have approved the traffic circulation plan . 9 . Stormwater Management : A centralized stormwater management system will be developed using a 16 . 4 acre stormwater management tract to be located in the middle of the project - Run -off will be directed into the stormwater tract via lot grading , a Miami curb system in the street, and periodically spaced side lot swales . A Type ` B " stormwater management permit will be required prior to issuance of a land development permit . Public Works has no objection to PD plan approval . 10. Utilities : The project will be served by county water and sewer service, and both Utility_ Services and Environmental Health have approved provision of those services . 11 . Waivers : The PD plan proposes no reduction in the RS - 3 minimum lot size or lot width for any lot . The plan proposes use of a 40' wide road right -of-way with Miami curb system and parallel 5 ' wide utility easements on either side of the 40' right-of- way in lieu of a standard 50' wide right-of-way. Also, the plan proposes 10' sideyard setbacks rather than the standard 15 ' wide RS - 3 sideyard setbacks . Overall , the proposed project is similar to the recently approved, adjacent Arbor Trace PD . The referenced waivers are summarized and compared in the table below : RS - 3 Minimum Approved Arbor Proposed Legend Standard Trace PD Lakes PD Lot Size 12 , 000 sq . ft . 12 , 054 sq . ft . 12 . 000 sq . ft . Lot Width 80 ' 80' 80' ( interior) Lot Width 90' 84 ' 95 ' ( comer) Frontyard Setback 25 ' ) 0 ' 25 ' Sidevard Setback 15 ' 10' * 10 , Rearyard Setback 25 ' 0) 25 ' Right-of- Way Width 50' S0 (Miami Curb ) * 40 ' (with 5 ' easements on each side) Density up to 3 units/acre 2 . 1 unit/acre 2 . 15 units/acre January 9 , 2001 35 �� IG 7 5 * The only two waivers requested . 12 . Public Benefits : In return for the two proposed waivers, the County will receive certain benefits from this project, over and above a conventional subdivision project. These are the internal pedestrian and recreation area improvements and the east, west, and north perimeter buffers . 13 . Recreation Area and Pedestrian Improvements : The proposed project satisfies the PD ordinance recreation area requirements as follows : Required Recreation Area: 1 . 97 acres Provided Recreation Area: 2 . 8 acres (includes recreation and playground tracts and sidewalk area) The plan proposes three separate recreation and plavground tracts , two at a little over %2 acre in size each and one at almost 1 acre in size. In addition, a 4 ' wide sidewalk system is proposed on one side of the loop road and each cul -de - sac , and on both sides of each entrance. The Oslo Road entrance sidewalks will connect the internal pedestrian system to the 8 ' wide recreation path that is required and will be provided along the site ' s Oslo Road frontage . 14. Dedication and Improvements : Right-of- Wai • Currently, a portion of the site ' s Oslo Road frontage has a right-of- way width of 50', while the remaining frontage has 30' of existing right-of-way . Due to the presence of a sub- lateral canal on the south side of Oslo Road, all additional right -of-way must come from the north side of the road within the subject site . To bring the Oslo Road right-of-way up to the 60' local road standard, the owner will be dedicating without compensation 10' of the right-of-way (where 50 ' of right-of-way exists ) and 30' of right-of-way (where 30' of the right -of-way exists) . To bring the right-of-way up to the 130' ultimate width for Oslo Road, another 70 ' of right-of-way is required . This 70' strip is shown on the plans and will be acquired by the county -of-way dedication is needed or required . Thus , through negotiation. No other right the plans satisfy right-of-way dedication requirements and accommodate future right- of-way needs . Paving: Currently, 5 " Street SW is unpaved but is the subject of a developers agreement for such paving . The Citrus Springs PD, .Arbor Trace PD, and Greystone subdivision projects are all conditioned upon this paving . Prior to issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase III of the Legend Lakes project, 5 `d Street SW must be paved from the 5h Street SW entrance to 43 `d Avenue or 58 " Avenue . Sidewalks: As required by the PD regulations , an internal sidewalk pedestrian system is proposed as previously described . Also , an 8 ' wide recreation path is required and proposed along the site ' s Oslo Road frontage . These internal and external sidewalk systems will be connected . Streetlights: Streetlights will be provided at project entrances , intersections , curves , and cul -de-sacs as depicted and will be the responsibility of a property owners association. Storm water and Recreation Tracts: Stormwater tracts and easements and recreation tracts will be the responsibility of a property owners association. January 9 , 2001 36 BK Pu x) 76 15. Concurrency : The applicant has signed a concurrency acknoivledgment agreement which fulfills the concurrency requirements for site plan approval . The applicant will be required to apply for and obtain a concurrency certificate prior to building permit issuance . 16 . Environmental Issues : There are no jurisdictional wetlands or native upland vegetative communities on site . Therefore . no special local environmental requirements apply . 17. Buffers and Setbacks : Around all four project site perimeters , a 25 ' wide PD setback and buffer is proposed . In addition, landscape tracts are proposed along both sides of each project entrance. Along the site ' s east and west perimeters , which abut PD project sites , a Type "C" buffer is proposed . Along the north perimeter, which abuts a sub- lateral canal and 5 `h Street SR' , a Type "D " buffer was originally proposed but has now been upgraded to a Type "C" buffer based upon a recommendation from the Planrung and Zoning Commission . Along Oslo Road , a double frontage/Type "D " buffer is the minimum required by the PD ordinance. However, based upon recommendations from staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission, the project ' s Oslo Road buffer has now been upgraded to a Type ` B " buffer with 6 ' opaque feature that will include the use of a landscaped berm . No wooden fencing will be used as part of this buffer. Such a buffer will be consistent with the landscape berm provided immediately to the east on the Arbor Trace project site . Detailed, final landscape plans for these buffers , as well as the recreation and entry landscape tracts , must be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to issuance of a land development permit . 18 . Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plant: The county Comprehensive Plan requires that Caribbean fruit fly host plants be prohibited within PDs located in general areas that have active citrus groves . This project is located in such an area; therefore, the prohibition regulation applies . The applicant has indicated that he has no objection to creating a restriction that would prohibit host plants on the subject property. Such restriction must be included in the project ' s covenants and restrictions , which will be reviewed at the time of final plat application . RECOMMENDATION • Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners Brant PD special exception use approval and approval of the requested waivers with the following conditions : I . Caribbean fruit fly host plants are prohibited within the project area. 2 . That prior to issuance of a land development permit, the applicant shall obtain from planning staff approval of detailed , final landscape plans for the required buffers , entry landscape areas , and recreation areas . a. The Oslo Road buffer shall meet or exceed the standards for a Type "B " buffer with 6 ' opaque feature and shall not include the use of a wooden fence, and b . The northern boundary buffer shall meet or exceed Type "C" buffer standards . January 9 , 2001 37 U 77 3 . That prior to or via the final plat, the applicant shall : a. Dedicate without compensation the 10' and 30' strips of right-of-way required to bring the Oslo Road right-of-way width up to 60' , and b . Place restrictions on the property that prohibits the planting of Caribbean fruit fly host plants . 4 . That prior to issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase III , a . The westbound right-turn lane for the project ' s Oslo Road entrance shall be complete , and b . 5 ` ' Street SW shall be paved from the 5 `d Street SW entrance to 43rd Avenue or 58 " Avenue, and C . The required westbound left- tum lane for the project ' s 5 ' Street SW entrance shall be complete . ATTR HM NTS : 1 . Application 2 . Location Map 3 . Preliminary PD Plan 4 . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes (unapproved) Commissioner Macht noted that there was only one lake in Legend Lakes . Responding to Vice Chairman Stanbridge and Chairman Ginn , Director Boling confirmed that portions of this area are in the 100 year flood plain which is why such a big lake is required for stormwater containment . There will be no aeration in this lake because it is not a standard requirement in the County ' s regulations . The County no longer has littoral zone requirements for storrnwater management ponds ; they were changed a few years ago to parallel St . Johns River Water Management District ' s requirements . Director Boling then explained the calculations for the open space advising that each individual lot has at least 40 % open space and then there are green recreational areas . The reason the overall open space is just above ( 40 . 8 °/x ) the requirement ( 40 % ) is the large stormwater area tract cannot be used in the calculation for green open space . January 9 , 2001 38 B G PG 673 Chairman Ginn thought this development was stretching PD Policy 5 . 4 because this area is presently a citrus grove , and Vice Chairman Stanbridge agreed . Community Development Director Robert M . Keating pointed out that this matter is not a PD rezoning request nor is the site located in a PD zoning district . This request is for a PD special exception . Also , he explained how the developer can plan the project ' s setbacks a little differently from setbacks required in a standard RS - 3 subdivision . Director Boling pointed out that this Legend Lakes ' site is different from the adjacent Arbor Trace project , which had existing tree areas . Legend Lakes was a grove with a little bit of shared vegetation along the property line with Arbor Trace . The three passive recreation sites on the plan are approximately '/2 acre and the site in the southeast corner is approximately 3/ of an acre . The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter . Randy Mosby , Mosby and Associates , specified that this property is in a flood zone , which had a major impact on open space requirements . Compensated storage dictated the size of the "Legend Lake " . The Code does not permit use of all that stormwater/lake area in calculating any open space . In response to Vice Chairman Stanbridge , he advised that recreational spaces were maximized in order to meet the County ' s regulations since quite a bit of land had been given to the lake . He was unsure what the developer planned to have in those recreational spaces and thought it alight be a good time for the Commissioners to meet the developer . Director Boling advised that a gazebo is planned for one area and a playground on the other two tracts . The two tracts by the entrance are ' ust a little over . 6 acres and the one by itself is just under one acre . He added that staff had insisted the recreation spaces be a little January 9 , 2001 39 I PG bit larger so they lost a few lots from their initial proposal . There is also a pedestrian system that connects the homes and the recreation areas as well as to sidewalks outside the project . Vice Chairman Stanbridge stressed that these recreational areas needed to be available for the recreation of the citizens who live there . Gary Smigiel , 1020 Lakeside Drive , Lake Worth , Florida, thought that the recreation spaces should be taken into consideration when the builders begin to build . He was thinking about gazebos , large shade trees , and playground equipment for the smaller children . Vice Chairman Stanbridge still believed the recreational amenities were too minimal , and Mr . Smigiel thought it was inappropriate to have ball fields or basketball courts . He lived next to a park where families can picnic , bring their children , and walk after dinner . When the use gets too intense , it is not really fair to the neighbors . It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing . Vice Chairman Stanbridge reiterated her desire for more open space , doubling the open space would suit her . MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , to approve the staff' s recommendation , adding that the developer double the recreations areas on the plan . Under discussion , Commissioner Macht thought it would be fair to ask the developer just to include the addition of an adjacent lot which might be a little less than doubling . Vice Chairman Stanbridge declined amending her motion . She felt that their new plan January 9 , 2001 40 BK % u 680 need not come back to the Board . Director Keating advised that the developer would lose about 7 or 8 lots in order to abide by the requirement of the motion . Chairman Ginn could not support the motion because the plan does not conserve any natural features ; she thought it should be developed without special exceptions . THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried 4 - 1 ( Chairman Ginn opposed ) . HaG . le FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ROSELAND ROAD SIDEWALK — PROJECT 9916 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 31, 2001 : TO : James Chandler, County Administrator ^` THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . , Public Works Direct_o:;: ✓ AND Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , P . E . , County Enginee>[' FROM : Robert S . Skok, Civil Engineer e SUBJECT : FDOT Supplemental Agreement for Roseland Road Sidewalk - IRC Project No . 9916 DATE : January 3 , 2001 DESCRIPTION ANIS CONDITIONS Staff is following guidelines from the FDOT Local Agency Program for funding of concrete sidewalks . Staff has obtained a chance for obtaining S23 . 000 . 00 of increased funding for the Roseland Road Sidewalk project . Our current approved funding is for 5229 , 000 . 00 . The new total will be $ 252 , 000 . 00. ANALYSIS In October 1999 , the FDOT and Indian River County entered into an agreement for 5229 , 000 . 00 funding to be provided by the FDOT to Indian River County for reimbursement after the County January 9 , 2001 41 constructs the Roseland Road Sidewalk. Since that time the County has entered into a contract with the Florida East Coast Railway for the railway to construct improvements to accommodate the sidewalk. Staff has written the FDOT for additional funding . The attached letter, dated November 29 , 2000 from Gary Keife explains the FDOT can supply an additional $23 , 000 . 00 . In order to confirm this additional funding, the County must submit the supplemental agreement to the FDOT . RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the supplemental agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Supplemental Agreement ? . Letter from FDOT dated November 29 , 2000 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to sign the Local Agency Program Supplemental Agreement with State of Florida Department of Transportation , as recommended in the memorandum . I-ai.0 r ny ncAGREENIENF IS ON FILE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11 . G . 2 . RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 006 - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( FDOT ) MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT - COUNTY LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION ALONG US - 1 FROM HARRISON STREET TO THE NORTH COUNTY LINE - STATE PROJECT 88010 - 3507 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 5 , 2000 : TO : James E . Chandler , County Administrator FROM : James W . Davis , P . E . Public Works Director SUBJECT : Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement for State Project 88010 - 35071 FIN # 228603152010 US 1 from Harrison Street north tc Brevard County Line January 9 , 2001 I{ IPG DATE : December 5 , 2000 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Florida DOT is ready to bid the resurfacing of US 1 from Harrison Street to the north county line . Landscaping and beautification will be performed at a cost of approx . $ 170 , 000 . The County is being requested to execute the attached maintenance memorandum of agreement ( MOA ) and maintain the medians and border areas . Plans for landscaping are in the Public Works Department office . RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the attached maintenance MOA . Funding for maintenance shall be from the Parks Division budget and Road and Bridge Division budget . ATTACHMENT Letter from Carl Higgins to James Davis dated Nov . 28 , 2000 Memorandum of Agreement ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams . SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No . 2001 - 006 authorizing the execution of District Four Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement with respect to U . S . Highway 1 landscaping maintenance from the St . Sebastian Catholic Church to the Brevard County line . RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 006 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DISTRICT FOUR MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO U . S . HIGHWAY 1 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE FROM THE ST . SEBASTIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH TO THE BREVARD COUNTY LINE . January 9 , 2001 43 P b � WHEREAS , the State of Florida Department of Transportation wishes to install $ 170 ,000 worth of landscaping/irrigation in the medians and borders of the travel way within the right-of-way of U . S . Highway 1 (S . R . 5 ) from the St. Sebastian Catholic Church to the Brevard County line ; and WHEREAS , in consideration of the Department' s installation of landscaping improvements they wish Indian River County to maintain the installed landscaping . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Chairman is authorized to execute District Four Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement DSF - Maintenance as described above . The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dge , and , upon being put to a vote , the vote was as follows : Commissioner Fran B . Adams Ave Commissioner Caroline D . Ginn �pyp Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht _ ye_ Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye Commissioner Ruth M . Stanbridge Ave The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th day of January , 2001 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA Caroline D . Ginn Chairman A Jeffrey K . B Clerk ArPnOVEO As TO FORM AND LE (jAL. SUFFICIENCY B .� a ( ( � Deputy Clerk v; I ; � in, r ° � . LOLLIN n PATRICIA M . RIDGELY AGREEMENT IS ON FILE : DLPU1 '( COUNTY ATTORNEY IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TFif.: BOARD January 9 , 2001 r0 L 44 r 11 . 11 . 1 . BID AWARD 43032 - WATER SEWER AND RECLAIM WATER REPLACEMENT /EXTENSION AND MISCELLANEOUS LABOR CONTRACT - G . E . FRENCH The Board reviewed a Memorandum of December 21 . 2000 : DATE : DECEMBER 21 , 2000 TO : JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR THRU : DONALD R. HUBBS , P. E. , DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERI PREPARED AND STAFFED STEVEN DOYLE , P. E. , CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER BY : GORDON SPARKS , P. E. , ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER 7 SUBJECT: BID AWARD # 3032 WATER, SEWER, AND RECLAIM WATER REPLACEMENTkEXTENSION AND MISCELLANEOUS LABOR CONTRACT — UTILITIES DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND In 1993 . the Board awarded a bid to a vendor for an annual labor contract for three one-year periods. The contract established a fixed fee for the installation of utility construction materials purchased by the Utility Department. The Board ea-tended the award for an additional three years in 1996 . In 1999 . the vendor decided to pursue work elsewhere. and notified Purchasing that they would no longer be available to work for the Countv Utility . The continuation of a similar type of contract is desirable. in that it has allowed the Utility Department to meet the demands of utility installation in a timely and cost-effective manner, therefore . a similar contract was recently put out to bid. The contract will be for a two-year period. The activity thus far is detailed as follows : BID OPENING DATE : DECEMBER 8 . 2000 (see attached bid tabulation) ADVERTISING DATES : NOVEMBER 8m & 15TH. 2000 BID DOCUMENTS PURCHASED BY : SEVEN (7) VENDORS REPLIES : FIVE ( 5) VENDORS THE BID TABULATION MAY BE SUMMARIZED AS FOLLOWS BID TAB TOTAL AMOUNT BID G.E . French utility constructors. Ft Pierce . FLA 5 48 . 673 .62 Treasure Coast Contracting, Vero Beach. FLA S 63 .023 . 75 Shelua & Sons. Inc.. Indiantown, FLA S 136 .622 . 99 Empower Construction. Inc.. Frostproof. FLA S 213 .906 .06 H2O Utility Services. Holiday. FLA S 222 . 771 .98 January 9 , 2001 45 P 85 TOTAL AMOUNT OF LOW BID $48,673. 62 i SOURCE OF FUNDS Water Utilities Other Improvements (Except { Bldg. Funds ESTIMATED BUDGET: 5 3009000.00 ANALYSIS The Staff reviewed the five bid packages, and checked the individual items. as well as the subtotals and totals for each one submitted. The low bid was then tested by applying the unit prices from each bidder. to a small. low-pressure force main project proposed in the City of Sebastian. This is the type of project the labor contract will typically be used for. ( See attached table) . The costs for labor for the project are given below for each bidder. HYPOTHETICAL PROJECT TOTAL COST G. E. French_ utilitv constructors. Ft. Pierce. FLA S 24 .085 . 95 Treasure Coast Contracting, Vero Beach_ FLA $ 34.406 .25 Sheltra & Sons. Inc. . lndiantowrt FLA S 54. 162 . 81 Empower Construction. Inc. . Frostproof FLA $ 59.238. 3 H2O Utilitv Services_ Holiday. FLA S 30. 906 .25 This "test" helps verify that G. E . French is the low bidder for relatively small assessment and other type water and sewer projects that the Utilities Department intends to engage the company for. Staff made a visit to Mr. French ' s office. as well as to a site development project currently under construction in FL Pierce by Mr. French. This. along with a positive response from references provided by Mr. French. has resulted in the following recommendation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to G. E. FRENCH , as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specificauons for Bid No. 3032 : the Labor Contract Agreement. and that the Chairman execute the same . ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge , SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams , the Board unanimously awarded Bid # 3032 to G . E . French in the amount of $ 48 , 673 . 62 for work as set out in the bid documents , as recommended in the memorandum . LABOR CONTRACT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK "1-0 TI IE BOARD January 9 , 2001 k1 , i 8 C 46 11 . He2 . WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE — SCADA SYSTEM TASK TEAM ANALYSIS / PLAN REPORT — ROCHA CONTROLS , INC . Utilityr Services Director Donald R . Hubbs review- ed a Memorandum of December 5 . 2000 : DATE : DECEMBER 5 , 2000 TO : JAMES E . CHANDLER COUNTY" ADMINISTRATOR THRU : DONALD R HUBBS, PE, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVIC PREPARED SCADA SYSTEM Task Team : AND STAFFED GENE RAUTH, OPERATIONS MANAGER 4 BY : GERALD LEBEAU , SUPERINTENDENT WATER PRODUCTION ;# DENNIS BELFORD, COMPUTER NETWORK SUPPORT SPECIALIST STEVEN DOYLE, PE, CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER SUBJECT : WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE BACKGROUND As one of their ptiman functions. the Water Production Division of the Department of Utility Services operates and maintains the Countv ' s following listed facilities - South County Reverse Osmosis Plant Site North County Reverse Osmosis Plant Site Kings Highway Elevated Storage Tank Site Gifford Elevated Storage Tank Site Roseland Elevated Storage Tank Site North Beach Re-Pump Station Site • Grand Harbor Re-Pump Station Site Of these seven sites listed above, the South County and North County Reverse Osmosis Water Production Plant (WTPs) sites are staffed during daily operation . The attached figure nos . 1 and 2 depict the vicinity_ map of the County water production & storage facilities and the existing & proposed logic diagrams . The Gifford elevated water storage tank site and the Kings Highway elevated water tank site are each monitored remotely by a separate Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition ( SCADA) System from the South County Reverse Osmosis plant site . The North Beach Re-pump station site is monitored and controlled by a separate SCADA system from the North County Reverse Osmosis plant site . The Roseland elevated water storage tank site and the Grand Harbor Re-pump station site are currentiv, unmonitored since an operational SCADA system is not installed at these facilities . A primary goal of the Utility is the completion of a single countywide, comprehensive and uniform water production SCADA system . This system would allow the operational staff to control and monitor each of the seven locations from either of the two primary water production facilities (North or South RO WTPs ) . To achieve the goal of a single comprehensive, countvwide water production SCADA system. the County has assembled a team with representatives from the Computer Services Department, plant operations staff, and utility management . The Team has been meeting since March 2000 to review to overall planting effort and implement a phasing plan. The same team will continue to meet monthly to maintain project oversight and quality control . ANALYSIS At the present time the SCADA team has identified and prioritized several system upgrades , which would further facilitate the creation of the single countywide water production and management SCADA system. The system upgrades are outlined below along with their respective cost estimates . January 9 , 2001 47 a� I 1 G b System Upgrade Svstem Upgrade / Phase Description Estimated Priority / Phase Costs ( S ) Phase I. NORTH COUNTY REVERSE OSMOSIS i Upgrade the Human Machine Interface (HMI) terminal and software with the latest version of Rockwell Software ( RS- VIEW ) for the North County RO. High Service Pumps station. Currently, the existing terminal and software is not compatible with other plant (North and South Reverse Osmosis ) systems A Equipment, programming, and startup services for replacement of the Existing HMI at North Countv Reverse Osmosis . (Estimated Cost 513 , 134 - R&R Fund ) B Remove existing Panel view monitor and modify control panel for new Unit converts existing application and integrate plant wide screens. (Estimated Cost 54 , 950 - R&R Fund ) i Miscellaneous Computer hardware and penphery upgrades as determined by Computer Services Dept . ( Estimated Cost 525 ,000 — 50% Capacity Charge Fund / 500/6 R&R ) Contingencv at approximately 10% to be utilized as approved by the Director of Utilities. Total Estimated Cost ( rounded) 1 S47, 500 Phase II. MAIN PLANTS. i Upgrade the six ( 6 ) System HMI packages to latest version Allen Bradley — RS — View Software . The current software version being utilized is 6. 00.41 . The current and latest revision is 6 . 30 . This software upgrade will eliminate some nuisance errors currently being experienced by the operators. Estimated Cost ( 6 x 52, 850 = S17, 100 - R&R Fund) Upgrade the telephone leased lines modems at both plants to handle a high transfer rate to 19,200 bites per second (BPS ). The current modems are 9600 BPS . This upgrade will reduce plant operator ' s system wait time. Estimated Cost (2 x 51 ,310 = $2 ,620 - R&R Fund) i Add Allen Bradley communication modules (computer cards ) at both plants to bridge the independent Data Highway (DH) networks. Estimated Cost ( 2 x 53 ,410 = S6 ,820 - Capacity Charge Fund) r Meree North and South Reverse Osmosis HMI applications ( computer screens ) to provide control of both plants from either location. Estimated Cost ( 2 x 520 ,000 = $40 ,000 - Capacity Charge Fund ) r Enhance application and system performance errors as outlined by the operators at both plants . Estimated Cost (2 x 551000 = S101000 - Capaciry Charge Fund) r Miscellaneous Computer hardware and periphery upgrades as determined by Computer Services Dept. ( Estimated Cost $25 ,000 — 50% Capacity Charge Fund / 50% R&R ) Y Contingency at approximately 10% to be utilized as approved by the Director of Utilities Total Estimated Cost ( rounded) 5111 ,7011 Phase III. REMOTE SITES: Upgrade the current Allen Bradley Radio Telemetry Units (RTU) to Allen Bradlev model Slick-500 ( SLC-5/03 units & upgrade communication protocol to Modbus ) This replacement will modernize the system & eliminate obsolete equipment. Modbus protocol is the preferred method for radio communication, because of its structural simplicity. A Roseland Elevated Storage Tank Site equipment replacement. Estimated Cost S10,500 — R&R Fund B. Grand Harbor Re-pump Station system upgrade. Estimated cost 11,200 — R&R Fund C . Gifford Elevated Storage Tank Site system replacement. Estimated cost S10,500 - R&R Fund D. Kings Highwav Elevated Storage Tank Site system replacanent. Estimated cost S 10,500 - R&R Fund E. Highway 510 / 512 Pressure Station system Estimated cost $4200 - Capacity Charge Fund F. Sebastian Pressuue Monitoring Station. Estimated cost $4200 - Capacity Charge Fund r Contingency at approximately 10% to be utilized as approved by the Director of Utilities . Total Estimated cost ( rounded ) 548,500 Total Estimated Project Cost S207,700. 00 January 9 , 2001 B � 3 U � ,u ..t - . , .. -_ . .. . . 3 .. . �' -..i.�. . . . . . $ ea � . ,, � , :�. , , n > , ,:. ,•` :3- � . ;' .. s.. . , ,.- ,;, . `%=h > a : k ,.,; , ^5' r .L�. � a.� ., :� "' k a ,.:..: _ '.,:. An- .✓x ,; . nr ,:, ,:. a c « z , a� :3 a K . s3$'.�,•: ; r�. . tr,y_�'a#:h. < � c ; s If ,,.dif �; x . . . . w a•. ,�v. a 1� : . �' trh .:4,. yk,,. . � ....:.; .: . . .�^ � .9� . . .,- .: ria . . . ". . ..aY tr - ;;.. � r - , ''. (* .r.:,=• '., ' , .^. �« S Y �. . � s "�. .� x.:. s`y+'1 ° .. . . �* . , r1.x .. '1 Y 3t.=. '� ::'r. �+ :, ,.v , .;' ,, ... ., s s,..... .. ., .,.: r - c, , . ,s;- t,.,t>.• � -4. , v i r . nr. G . frz .°"ufiv ,v. �....a' b n � a.: -. ".'i��ax 'r:. „3 a? n��N�4se?� a>5,+4e^i "�? : aY , .o.r.3 t ` ,kr?P;. .a- .e.. � t t ''• 4 SUMMARY : The estunated cost associated with the outline system upgrades is $207 . 700 - It is the desire of the Department of Utility Services to facilitate the creation of the smele water production and management SCADA system by the outlined three phases . The overall system concept and the authorization to proceed with Phase I of the above work plan are requested under this Agenda Item . Subsequent Phases will be brought before the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance under separate agenda items as the scope of work and fee schedule for each has been fully developed and verified by the SCADA Team . At the present time the SCADA Team has completed its development of the Phase I Scope of Work _ Staff has obtained a price quote from ROCHA Controls Inc . in the amount of $ 18- 084 for their portion of Phase 1 . work ( See Attachment-A) . The County ' s Computer Services Department will be involved in any computer hardware and / or software upgrades as necessary to link the Utility plant sites to the Counrv ' s network system . ROCHA Controls has been used previously by the County for software and programming changes at both water plant sites . ROCHA have also provided initial support / design for the North County Reverse Osmosis plant re-pump site in 1993/ 1994 along with design and support for the new North Beach Re-pump Station in 1999/2000 . They have provided design and support for the South Countv Reverse Osmosis plant upgrade in 1992 and support work at the Grand Harbor Re-pump station. The staff of the Computer Services Department has reviewed the attached proposal for ROCHA Controls and provides their endorsement of the scope of work and associated fees . It is expected that the outline system upgrades will require a minimum of a year to complete . The proposed SCADA system improvements will reduce the current leased/dedicated telephone lines by converting to wireless (radio) telemetry communication type equipment thereby allowing the removal of leased based telephone lines . The deletion of select leased telephone lines will result in a net saving of approximately $4, 840 per year in operating expense . BUDGET / FINANCIAL HISTORY : The Department of Utilities has over the last 5 -years been planting for a countywide SCADA system to monitor and if necessary control vital infrastructure components such as the Reverse Osmosis Plants . Miscellaneous projects such as the North RO Plant Construction, South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility and the North Beach RO Plant conversion to a Repump Station initially incorporated a part of the overall SCADA system plan . I If The construction of the North RO Plant was one of the first integral pieces in the start of a countywide SCADA system. However, the Board may recall that the contractor for the RO Plant construction was in excess of 250 days behind schedule and was levied monetary damages as a result of their performance . The same contractor had also been awarded the contract for the South Regional WWTF Expansion prior to their downturn in performance. Again, the contractor was behind schedule and was levied monetary damages as a result of their performance . On December 7, 1999 the Department of Utilities recommended to the Board of County Commissioners that SCADA system improvements be deleted from the South regional WWTF contract and that the funds be reserved for use in implementing SCADA system improvements . The December 7, 1999 Agenda further requested that Staff be authorized to negotiate with the local vendors, suppliers, and subcontractors affiliated with the project and who were able to perform the required work ( see attachment- C) . The Board of County Commissioners has finalized three major construction activities related to the proposed water production pumping system upgrade. Contained within all three major projects, were originally designed elements of instrumentation and control technology and can be illustrated as follows : January 9 , 2001 49 BIt 1 8 9 5 kSe0x ° R 11 `:Y3 .�.� , tF*;� - , �a ' ` 7ys e Y i�v ,r,. . . -� rr ' «1{... � t.; rn z. s .aT � '. t +. �c�' � , 9 1 �, �zs•. �' s , r rx„£ >bh i➢=�krisr:u's- 'ay^,;-. a E4K ✓' :z .cv ,. , ! ' ., 124 i �x;,,eT& { °” >� .- x.- w, � � A ,a° 34`.to . . �«.`ix 2 s t=. , �. � �" v. , , , ,.,. . .. •° ;; Jt ri _ . . .` t , , ... _ . . ? 1 " ,'2hF '5e `S5i t 4Yj y26 �'v` "3 a '+ 3; .xa rL ��+�. `fes i }»ate£ k4 �. , � y `�, ts, iYti P.? s s 4 . ,^ ".f; tt s ,� <. t' '', .Ru ' t� [ ." au z ;-`§ 1• " b c � " 3 .. ✓ ' —o ' >b 3 1 C k ,:�a '�+ va1F l f f 1;3 'Z Available BCC Agenda Remarks € Project Descnption Contractor Funds Date Deducted work through Change 1 . ) Hobart Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Wharton-Strath 552,800 . 00 Apel 27, 1999 Order Approved BCC . (Refer to Attachment-B)t-B) (North RO ) jOrder cted work through Change 2 . ) South Regional Wastewater Wharton-Smith $ 148 ,862 .27 Dec . 7, 1999 Approve by BCC . Treatment Facility Expansion er to Attachment-C ) ucted work through Change 3 . ) North Beach Repump Station TLC Diversified 585 ,000 .00 April 11 , 2000 (Refer oder o°ved bv BC ttadtrnait-D)C Total I 5286.662 .27 The task teams development of the outline system upgrades to provide a single, comprehensive water production SCADA system may now release these monies deleted from pnor projects to be appropriated for this purpose . The total budget analysis, contained herein, amounts to $286. 662 . 27 exceeding the total proposed finalized planned cost of $207. 700 which would include the full vearlong implementation of the comprehensive water production SCADA system. r RECOMMENDATION : The staff of both the Department of Utility Services and Computer Services Department recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the following : a) Approve the overall SCADA plan for a single comprehensive countvwide water production SCADA system to serve the County ' s water production division. b ) Approve the overall budget estimate in the total amount of 207 , 700 . 00 as presented . c) It is further requested that the Board of County Commissioners accept and approve Work Authorization no . 1 from ROCHA Controls Inc . in the amount of $ 18 , 084 to perform Phase I scope of work . d) Authorize the Board of County Commissioners to approve the attached work authorization to ROCHA Controls Inc. as presented and allow the Chair to execute same . FUNDING SOURCE : The funding for the total project will come from the Renewal & Replacement (R&R) Funds No . 471 Charge Fund No . 472 . The total estirnated R&R budget ( fund no . 47 1 ) equals $ 107 ,992 and and Capacity the total estimated Capacity Charge budget (fund no. 472 ) equals $99 . 708 . Work Authorization No . i to Rocha Controls Inc . is included in the R&R LIST OF ATTACHMENTS : Figure No . 1 Vicinity Map of County Water Production & Storage Facilities Figure No . 2 Schematic of the Existing and Proposed SCADA System Communication Logic . Attachment-A . Work Authorization No . 1 dated November 28 . 2000 from Rocha Controls Inc . ater Treatment Plant (North RO ) - Finial Change Order 43 Attachment-B . Hobart Reverse Osmosis W and Final Pay Request Attachment-C . South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility — Final Change Order #4 and Final Pay Request sis Water Plant Conversion - Final Change Order 41 and Attachment-D . North Beach Reverse Osmo Final Pay Request i January 9 , 2001 B PG 690 50 i , - . „ £ a :i . , . , ,,..' wg ,,. ,,' : / �' Nz a'?e>n„�' �'"{3�; zd*`3;#,v� r� �^ �:� xwN yn. �Y✓ ,,. >} .3° 'f� r [,.,>, a ` ^:.# w � ws� s}' s r' s Y + . : .� '��:t, '1s ,rf 2 ,�R. � �, > ✓�'..,t r x - '�* T , x.=' � '.. r r";, r - a r ,' x, t E c ."s 4 , rat,' h`3$5� ..d`+4t' e � � � qs` : 'z v.$'.`.. fy.•, rs +v 4 ! .tL Y 4 r 4 C i Director Hubbs responded to Commissioner Adams ' inquiry and clarified the total amount being recommended ended up being less than the total amount budueted . ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge , the Board unanimously accepted the following : a ) approved roved the overall SCADA ( Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition ) plan for a single comprehensive countywide water production SCADA system to serve the 1 County ' s water production division ; b ) approved the overall budget estimate in the total amount of $ 207 , 700 , as presented ; c ) accepted and approved Work Authorization No . I from ROCHA Controls , Inc . , in the amount of $ 18 , 084 , to perform Phase I scope of work ; and d) approved the proposed work authorization to ROCHA Controls Inc . , as presented , and authorized the Chairman to execute same , as recommended in the memorandum . DOCUMENT IS ( PENDING CORPORATE CLARIFICATION ) ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD +f 13A I S CHAIRMAN GINN - DISCUSSION TO CLARIFY POLICY REGARDING CLOSURE OF G . PIERCE WOOD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Vice Chairman Ginn reviewed her Memorandum of December 29 , 2000 : January 9 , 2001 51 x . 111 . c-11 Ir. �`i `* �, cy "* ✓ fr777 'i xx t¢ t i '' „ K ' '� a r £ � n ' 71 .t ±, . ... F x u W t + a To : County Commissioners From . Commissioner Caroline Ginn Date : December 29 , 2000 Subject : * Florida Association of Counties 2001 Legislative Program ! Final Policy Statement re . Closure G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital and * Proposed Legislation Filed by Rep . Lindsay Harrington Some time ago , the BCC determined that we would oppose the closing of the G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital (GPW ) , and I was appointed to serve on the Facility Utilization Committee established by the Florida Association of Counties , to plan and prepare the catchment area for the closure of GPW . There has been little activity to date . However , final policy statements from the Florida Association of Counties 2001 Legislative program , reveals that they now support investing savings from the closure of GPW to fund community-based care programs servicing those counties that fall within the hospital ' s catchment area . ( See attached ) In an E- mail delivered December 19 , 2000 , Joe Anne Hart, Governmental Liaison , Florida Association of Counties , attached a mental health bill which has been filed by Representative Lindsay Harrington ( R-Charlotte ) , which calls for the continued operation of the G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital , among others . The BCC will need to determine the direction you want to go in this matter: Community- based care supported by the State , or legislation requiring GPW to remain operational . I will place this on the BCC ' s January 9th meeting agenda for discussion and direction . Chairman Ginn asked Jean Kline to speak on this whole issue . Jean Kline , Indian River County Health Department Administrator, has been involved with the closure of GPW and its effect on our community for approximately six months . The Community Health Network has petitioned our local Legislative Delegation to look at the CHWs concerns and recommendations . The closing of GPW will eliminate 350 beds for the most severe long- term psychiatric patients ; about 110 will be relocated to South Florida January 9 , 2001 52 81K 1 16 Pb 4.71,^ h r ti4 la ti # ) y. # u s u3 t ry 'Cp S ` .. mak€ YSl�t kR tk: Yxii kk Ad i Ix Y 3' KS 'i 177 4 ,:zr .sou lrl ::;•'^: 6i.,m. { , " .a. « `�f ;.m.. .y� <. k.s t ._f':, c "& ate.. . . a hrot 5 k9 a.. d :nig.-'u F`yd°N3 0 ..# S , m 3. � . , . .., t ,. ,�,' , . ..,. �.'x�rs i ,Y•- z :rr n ,F.- . f, S ;syY."w a... 4 t. y . . :5" r . . ''d a` ;`S '}x . ...f,.. # p .: asr3^Sa 4 Psychiatric Hospital ( a privatized state hospital ) . Sometimes patients have to wait 2 to 3 months for placement in a hospital eyen with GPW open . Occasionally someone who meets the criteria has had to wait as long as 6 months . Those local individuals needing assistance will require full services in order to maintain a level of performance and integration into our community . The Department of Children and Families has formed FACT (Florida Assertive Community Treatment) teams to work with the most severe psychiatric disorders in order to maintain those patients in an integrated community environment . Funding has been proposed to add a short - term ( 3 - 6 month stays ) treatment center , however, supervised apartment placement , assurance of correct levels of medication , employment opportunities , and assurance that patients who have been placed do not lose the benefits they need in order to maintain stability are problems still requiring action and funding . Many issues are coming forward due to the closure of GPW which is a fait accompli . Numerous phone callers have supported the least restrictive environment . How we deal with these issues community - wide will have impact on all the services . It will require our close attention and continued ;gl monitoring . Chairman Ginn advised that the Florida Association of Counties (FACo) now supports money going back into the community to create a less restrictive setting . Legislation will be introduced by Representative Harrington of Charlotte County to keep GPW open . This causes a policy dilemma . The Board has wanted the hospital kept open , but others tell us it will be closed regardless of our support . She felt the Board needed to ensure that money comes to the local community to provide care for these patients . Commissioner Adams thought the Board has seen this evolve since the original notification of this closure , the immediate reaction was to try to keep it open due to concern about not having a place to send our constituents who need that type of treatment . All the counties responded and Chairman Ginn was asked to serve on a committee for that purpose . January 9 , 2001 53 ! 1 b b 3 7774 ?77"777x c . I I I ' I f to POWWOW` .k:.."e:: rn ..%, . � `' . ca *r" f As discussions continued , it became very apparent GPW will close . A new effort has been launched to try to get funding to come back to the community to take care of the people who may need to wait before being transferred to one of the other hospitals . The problem is those other hospitals are far away . She understood that we are now trying to maintain services somehow locally . It seems to be logical to bring the money to the local level rather than try to fight an uphill battle to keep GPW open without Governor Jeb Bush ' s support . Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that FACo ' s Health and Human Resources E committee , on which she serves as vice- chairman , spent hours discussing strategy on case management , funding for it , and how to help the very small counties which do not have resources if the State does not provide them . She predicted it will be very difficult when GPW closes and the communities are not prepared . One of the policy statements was to ask for those funds to be sent to the local governments . Ms . Kline thought that closing GPW will put an additional burden on an already k fragile system . She felt that was the reason for the rise in concern . Also , the prior " de - s institutionalization " of many large state hospitals has failed . The FACT teams only take care of 100 of the most severely ill patients . They are already assisting those clients who have been previously discharged from GPW and those who have a lesser extent of illness , but still have tremendous needs . Ms . Kline thought each county was having to address this on their own . Alcohol , Drug Abuse and Mental Health is under the Department of Children and Families ; she is involved at the local level because of the huge involvement in primary care . They see people with daily needs through the school health programs . They have already begun integrating some mental health services with the primary care program , which has been very well utilized . They try to find the resources , which are very limited , for the people who come in need of help . January 9 , 2001 J4 GK FG 0` 941 e ;4 4 , t M�.wC'" „N , r :wvs " a. a 3 k ba ti+ kNs x a ( t1 ,�7777 ? Nb Y 3,'4rC°` �'` �€'�, r F+`t � » m. f j x r i a � � '�t?1,} a mk xy�'i„�" . %��+ �*` A Pt hti .. � y �v ss! x i � f ,„ '.. . t . F f .,e,'f sze ' . � s r ✓ )r� ,r, -.:f� p 'a`s: Y 4j a YX p S'' �s . 4fi ti P y Y' ` �'k•!• `! y ct i ? s 3 { I " s' 114 n a . 7 �., 'kz ' S ."a,5v-'a . 1`.5 .. ,F. n . ., ,ata, t 4 .v' s,"^ „ ✓ , r.P., e . m iy '; ?, $ ^eW. YR-S. YY 8 �ri' fy Sh '' h 'e A {jM ) 3 r 4 - i > r: a $ s 7' s J .w tIf " '" ' s e '^YY } * ''" _ v '. rIt" r y 5 $ „ 1If I If - .. v' ec ,�s9 i ' ✓ Ta' daz' : `x v41 :V 'v^ v.Z " x r3. r r ,. i 4, f , s:r a ... 3 r• ,, t ::i,x`,y: . ,'jV' - !». ^' ..Xf.�",, ""i) MOWN P } &S eNus'*wa #' .. ai. Chairman Ginn a local newspaper article that said New Horizons was in need of beds l and staffing for crisis units , short - term residential treatment units , and group homes which can be very costly . They also need funding for medical costs , housing cost aid , and r medication . She suggested that the Board postpone any action on this matter at this point and advised of her request on agenda item 13 . A . 2 . b 13 . A .Ze CHAIRMAN GINN — OUT— OF— COUNTY TRAVEL TO ARCADJAs FLORIDA TO VISIT G . PIERCE WOOD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Vice Chairman Ginn requested the Board ' s approval to travel with Health Department Administrator Jean Kline , Human Services Director Joyce Johnston - Carlson , and Community r Health Network Chair Bev O ' Neill to visit G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital in Arcadia . They will be able to report their findings to the Board at the Janua � 16 ' meeting and there would still be time to act and bring it to the Legislative Delegation ' s meeting on January 19th . ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht , SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin , the Board unanimously approved out - of- county travel for Vice Chairman Ginn and her companions , as discussed , to visit G . Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital in Arcadia , Florida, and bring information back to the Board , as requested . 13 . A . 3e CHAIRMAN GINN — INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN FORT PIERCE CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION PARADE The Board reviewed a letter of December 19 , 2000 : January 9 , 2001 55 BK I G P 6 9 J IV c E`.vt -ai 8`"' ;l `tir a yt tt fi* $F s'Jw, sir11 , irr ;yt r 4 x ' If I If r i a _ r t F Y,µps�` ✓r ? ' ' x r '.. s Aye- '�^ a "a vn ;�^'y, # '* i<z 'a ; s rIf iu "s > +? y Jr£{"i ..:,tom 3 r:.. If ^` .: n � iris 'i btu ss It s' '> II KJ ' tIV rot .. ,arr,. s. . M'�f. , rc , . . . 3 . . r .� ., r, x F ! 4J Cx .'yA4 Y ' Yf�. hY xi Ex G z x nt y y` ' v In 'In- In I I� t .f In r , , s, :; r ,•f:Pa'�� `� `ka .. .ra . x �eita r kt�,,,:.. ku'°."'� a6ce .'f tI` �'s 4`� � z: sA'8Y�'r. ,','1"�rw` '�9`t � fi�k"' ,. af+ia f:1 =4 *n . � ya � 'S °k, i4+ v ' �'s . �Y �y} ,w � .v ADDITION TO 01 -09-20C A6 M19A - ITEM 13 . A. 3 MY Of ORT PIERCE loris a C I ?''t OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION TEL (561 ) 460-2200 CITY HALL, 100 NORTH U . S. 1 FAX (561 ) 466-5492 P. O. BOX 1480 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34954- 1480 December 19, 2000 The Honorable Kenneth R. Macht Indian River Commissioner 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Dear Commissioner Macht: I am writing to invite you to participate in our upcoming Fort Pierce Centennial Celebration Parade, Saturday, February 3 , 2001 beginning at 9: 00 a. m. It is an exciting time in our historic waterfront community and I want to extend to you and other Treasure Coast cities to share in our Centennial festivities. This year we are joining with the annual Cattleman's Parade featuring the U . S . Navy Band Jacksonville, local high school bands, community organizations and more . I have enclosed a parade application for your consideration. As one of the oldest communities on the east coast of Florida, Fort Pierce has been successful in preserving much of its natural beauty and historic architecture. We are proud to have numerous community activities and events highlighting our rich history that lead up to the February 2, 2001 birthday celebration. We anticipate over 50,000 people during the two-day celebration which will truly be a once in a lifetime event for county and city residents to long remember. I look forward to your participation in the Centennial Parade or any other activity that may work with your busy schedule . Should you have any question, please feel free to contact me or my staff at City Hall . C ! STRIBUTIOKItST Sincerely ( ommissioners.r � Administrotor Attorney . Pnrscnnel Edwar G. Enns Foblicworks - Mayor Commo .nity Der. Ulililies EGE/aws rinonce Enclosures pMg cc : Members of City Commission Emerg . 5err. Risk Mgt . G , h z r74�C` January 9 , 2001 56 tri I � PG 0 In In � F 4 to T� x = r x 4 t 4 T Y F h I F S 4 x C fl ' r Y s, .,. a ... . Y 2ry &"�, s'�f�i� ."t/ aCa';` p,��,C,. '•srt h gk, 3T R '� _ { } : . "�` a; , ...,i.. . s2 , F�.,. � h , . '. `:' ."r.k�„ i,.• fi ' x,}y �ktr' max• r r„x, c{ -i .aw^ m .._,. . c, _ ¢a` � y x Sy s i After a brief discussion , there was CONSENSUS that the Board send a proclamation to the Cin° of Fort Pierce and a suggestion that perhaps one of our local antique automobile enthusiasts might provide a few antique cars for their parade . ( CLERK ' S NOTE : A copy of the proclamation has been filed with the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board . ) Mone VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR PERSONS OVER 65 WITH LESS THAN 52041000 ANNUAL INCOME ( " SAVE OUR SENIORS " ) DISCUSSION The Board reviewed Florida Department of Revenue Property Tax Bulletin PTA - 99 - 06 concerning Additional Homestead Exemption for Persons 65 and Older . ( Filed with the backup for the meeting in the office of the Clerk to the Board . ) Vice Chairman Stanbridge recounted that in November she sent a memorandum to Administrator Chandler asking that some research be done on the ramifications of additional homestead exemption . Staff advised the Commissioners in a memorandum of December 5 `h that it is very difficult to extract this type of information since there is no way to know how many persons over 65 would qualify for the additional exemption . If the Board takes any action , it is essential to know how it would impact the budget . There is a December 1 " deadline and it will take time to do the research . Assistant Administrator Baird advised that this was known as the " Save Our Seniors " exemption for homesteaded households of persons over 65 years of age earning under $ 20 , 000 as defined as line 33 on IRS Form 1040 . Staff looked at the impact over a year ago when the law became effective . The law applies only to counties and municipalities , not to the School Board or any other independent taxing districts . An ordinance is required to January 9 , 2001 57 t i PG 697 IT 77, sr t$ r - 77 z n.. :,.. .... ., ,- .. : u'��.3 ,,.. ,.. ,,,._„ . ..<�t . ,. ate, Ya,",.Sr "" '� ✓s-:y'd + .rP 3 , ...a` s'1s '� xirr4i "& 4 s �.y , ., ` .?gt , , . aR< "�asA�'€�b' provide an additional homestead exemption of up - to- $ 25 , 000 to resident homeowners who have legal or equitable title of the real estate . The State attempted to make an estimate over a year ago but staff felt it was inaccurate . There is no data base with all the information . He specified that we do not know how many people over 65 have a homestead exemption nor how many of them have an annual income of $ 20 , 000 or less on line 33 of their 1040 tax form . These unknown quantities make it very difficult to estimate with any accuracy how the budget would be affected . He knew of no other county in the state that has been able to come up with a good estimate . He pointed out that a tax cut given those individuals would necessitate a redistribution of tax burden to other property owners . He questioned the findings of Don Wilson of the Office of Economic and Demographic Research ; they estimated a reduction of revenue for Indian River County of $ 576 , 727 . Mr . Wilson advised him there was no data base in the state with the necessary factual information . Mr . Baird also made the point that people might have tax - exempt income and receive a lot more income than required on line 33 of their 1040 . Commissioner Macht spoke against the County pursuing it for reasons such as an opportunity for fraud , the burden on the Property Appraiser and others who have to work with it; and the unfair burden which would shift to others who do not make $ 20 , 000 a year and may be raising a family and might not even own their homes . Chairman Ginn was concerned because it does shift the tax burden to everyone else . Commissioner Adams felt that if the Legislators had really wanted to help the counties , they would have required that everyone pays on the first $ 25 , 000 value and all the exemptions come off over that which would be more fair and equitable . She also believed the $ 500 disability exemption was far too low ; making it higher was probably more deserving because of the additional impacts in assisting the disabled . Vice Chairman Stanbridge explained that her initiative was to see if some sort of data January 9 , 2001 58 P 6 9 8 5 1 Y Ryv ' vN 4 .. . , ..,. _ _ x . . . . If If- fee efIf, F } qf-lIfl, f ef, # a + .q. '+°..✓ . ""' '4px w „a�S'w"' SKC; �" ,.�„ + '" 'Te -. �'+ v.g1 '2 5 is 3 x ' 1 e x i a + ' e . , v.,, ? _ _ s , �, s s v 1 S';r.S sIll; ro v rg i could be determined to help make an informed decision . There are seniors who do need relief and are not tnIing to go around the system who could be our next homeless . She thought there may be other options such as phasing it in as Brevard County has done . She recalled that when the Board first talked about it , they decided to bring it back for consideration . Property Appraiser David Nolte advised that he had been thinking about how to get reasonable numbers since the additional exemption became law . He suggested that data gathering might be an excellent project for a high school statistics class because the data base does not exist . He thought some people would not apply for it because they considered it welfare and others might fraudulently apply for it . Commissioner Adams asked if it would be appropriate for Mr . Nolte to include a questionnaire in the TRIM notice . Mr . Nolte responded that including a questionnaire with the TRIM notice would be too late since a decision has to be made prior to December Is' . He understood the LAAC is supposed to be putting out an information packet for a community- wide mailing, which might include a sheet for information to build a data base . His office has received many calls from seniors asking when the additional exemption will take effect . He pointed out , as Mr . Baird had , there would be a redistribution of the tax burden . Chairman Ginn disliked the redistribution of the tax because she knew young families are really struggling . Vice Chairman Stanbridge reminded them that the decision is not being made today , but she felt it was owed to the people to at least have a stab at getting the information . Mr . Baird advised that Mr . Wilson had estimated the revenue impact on Indian River County at $ 576 , 727 , which he later admitted was a very rough estimate . The biggest problem is getting the income tax information . The data on the age of those already having January 9 , 2001 59 t p i0 P6 99 4 elf fee If If If el e, . _. - `a x a z „✓•j, 'k homestead exemption would be less difficult to obtain . In response to questions , Mr . Nolte estimated the tax on a $ 50 , 000 home , with homestead exemption , would be about $ 500 ; about $ 100 to $ 150 of that would be shifted, depending on whether the municipalities joined in . He has not been notified by any municipality that has adopted an ordinance granting the additional exemption . Administrator Chandler recalled , and Mr . Baird agreed , that the $ 576 , 727 estimate was only for the general fund and did not include the MSTU or Emergency Services District . Since those both utilize ad valorem taxes they would be included . Mr . Nolte advised that Brevard County is in the midst of collecting the data ; he thought they would have the information by August and perhaps we might be able to derive some inference from their experience , but every county in the state is different . Chairman Ginn wished to take no action since this item was not published on the agenda , and Vice Chairman Stanbridge again pointed out they are just asking for information , not making any decision . Mr . Nolte pointed out that the people who have called appear to be very much in need and very concerned about this tax relief. Chairman Ginn responded that there are other emergency funding assistance possibilities for those who need it . Further discussion ensued after which Chairman Ginn understood there was CONSENSUS that staff come back with further information so the public would be aware . Items added to the agenda after it has been published are supposed to be emergency items . Vice Chairman Stanbridge questioned this , asking if other items added to this agenda were emergency items . Chairman Ginn responded that the Board has not kept this strictly , but that is the way it is supposed to be , so that the public is informed . January 9 , 2001 60 BX I PU 700 1777777 1 h e <l -77 77 ell Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that she was only asking for information , the public would be informed that the Board would be working on better information . Commissioner Tippin requested thev move along . Mr . Baird advised that he will contact the Office of Economic and Demographic Research 13A COMMISSIONER MACHT - TRANSFER STATIONS- MANDATORY GARBAGE PICKUP Deferred to next meeting by Commissioner Macht who was already late for an out - of- county appointment . 13 . E . COMMISSIONER TIPPIN - REPORT ON UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN - PRIZES FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES Commissioner Tippin was pleased to announce that the $ 12 , 500 0 goal for fund raising by the County employees under the chairmanship of Superintendent of Parks Division Jim Romanek , had again exceeded the goal and , as of a few days ago , the figure was $ 16 , 630 . 20 or 42 % over the amount raised last year . It had been a thrill working with Mr . Romanek on this who did a fantastic job and had some wonderful ideas . One of his ideas was to have some incentive awards for which all the participants would be eligible . He called Mr . Romanek forward to assist in the name drawing for the awards . The Commissioners drew names for the following prizes and winners : Two ( 2 ) Days off with pay Barbara Morgan One ( 1 ) Day off with pay Kenneth Joseph Gift Certificate - TGIF Phillip Hadsell Gift Certificate - AMC Theaters Margaret Wilson January 9 , 2001 61 6K 1 1 b PU 70 1 EIT If - #, vt .5,' >a .t3 1 f s zr 1 .£ G "1 9 IT Gift Certificate - Applebee ' s Julie Ziegler Gift Certificate - Chili ' s Jenny Hadsell Gift Certificate - Guytano ' s Sylvia Colvin Gift Certificate - Ruby Tuesday ' s Van Bass Commissioner Tippin specified that supervisors and managers were not eligible for this drawing . He complimented Mr . Romanek on a job well done and looked forward to next year and doing it even bigger and better . Jim Romanek , Superintendent of Parks Division , thanked the Commissioners , Administrator Chandler , and Commissioner Tippin on behalf of the Indian River County employees . Over 18 presentations , many of them before 7 AM , had been done by Commissioner Tippin and himself. He also thanked the employees and stated it was a pleasure to have chaired this effort . He looked forward to next year . Chairman Ginn thanked Mr . Romanek on behalf of the Board for all his hard work . 13 . F . COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS /REAPPOINTMENTS FOR 2001 AND FILLING OF VACANCIES The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 3 , 2001 and the accompanying list : TO : Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE : January 3 , 2001 SUBJECT : COMMITTEE RE-APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2001 AND FILLING OF VACANCIES .vma, FROM : Kimberly E . M sung Executive Aide to the Commission Description and Condition The following committees have members that need to be re- appointed for the year 2001 or have vacancies that the Board needs to seek replacements for. January 9 , 2001 BK I PI; 7 0 2 62 w , 41 �.. . , IM Is, Recommendation Unless the Board decides to do otherwise , the following standing members will be re-appointed for the next term . Appointments to fill vacancies will be brought to the Board on a committee by committee appointment basis . Attachment- 1999/2000 Attendance Report Re-appointments/Vacancies for 2001 Agriculture Advisory Committee (2 year term ) Commissioner Fran Adams Dave Berggren ( Associated Industry Representative) Jerry Johnson ( Associated Industry Representative ) Mark Sanchez ( Citrus Representative) Vacancy (Vegetable Representative) Beach & Shore Preservation AdvisoryCommittee 2 -vear term Commissioner Fran Adams Art Neuberger (City of Vero Beach) Walter Barnes ( City of Sebastian) Ernie Polverari (Town of Orchid) Bob Baker (City of Fellsmere) Bob Leshe (Indian River Shores) Thomas Lowther (BCC Representative) Michael Vanatta (BCC Representative) George Bunnell (BCC Representative) Vacancy (BCC Representative) Board of Zoning Adjustment 2 -vear term Chris Marine (Adams/District 1 ) Fred Plair (Macht'District 3 ) Vacancy (Ginn/District S) Building Code Board of Adjustments & Appeals — 4 vear term Vacancy (Building Industry Representative) Vacancy (General Contractor Representative) Children ' s Services Advisory Committee — 4-vear term Rolf Bibow (Tippin/District4) Joan Woodhouse (Member-at-Large) Code Enforcement Board — unlimited 3-vear term Jack Owens (Engineer) Joseph Garone (General Contractor) January 9 , 2001 63 8 PG703 1. 4 ,tn si.. W <. ff f Economic Development Council Vacancy (Fellsmere Representative) Vacancy (Banking Representative) Economic Opportunities Council ( 1 -vear term - State committee) Joyce Johnston-Carlson Jerry Morgan Norma Mooney Indian River Countv Extension Advisory Council — 3 vear term Betty Gipson ( Stanbridge/District 2 ) Michael Ziegler ( Tippin/District 4 ) Vacancy (MachvDistrict 3) Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (2-vear term ) Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Art Neuberger (City of Vero Beach Representative) Ed Majcher (City of Sebastian Representative) Robert Leshe (Town of Indian River Shores Representative) Lee D . "Toni" Robinson (Indian River Land Trust Representative) Richard Baker (Pelican Island Audubon Society Representative) Talmage Rogers (Chamber of Commerce Representative) Jim Granse (Taxpayer ' s Association Representative) Janice Broda (Mosquito Control District Representative) Dennis Forbes (Member at Large) C . C . "Bud" Kleckner ( Sierra Club Representative ) Vacancy (Developer Representative) Vacancy (Civic Association) Metropolitan Planning Organization — 4 vear term for Countv Commissioners and Commissioner John Tippin Commissioner Caroline Ginn Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Parks and Recreation Committee — 1 year term Commissioner Fran Adams John Capra (City of Vero Beach Representative) Susan Wilson (City of Fellsmere Representative) Nancy Diamond (City of Sebastian Representative ) Ed Majcher (Alternate-City of Sebastian Representative) Barbara Holmen-McKenna ( Indian River Shores Representative ) Bill Wilson (Gifford Representative) James Jenkins (Alternate- Gifford Representative ) Dale Klaus ( School Boad Representative) Billie Minnis (North County Representative ) Scott Chisholm ( South County Representative ) January 9 , 2001 64 B Pb704 Planning& Zoning Board 4 year r erm George Hamner (Member-at-Large) Donna Keys (Adams/District 1 ) Leland N . "Bud " Gibbs (Macht/District 3 ) Gene Winne (Ginn/District 5 ) Professional Services .Advisory Committee — 2 year term Rodney Paradise Robert Gaskill Vacancy Tourist Development Council — 4 year term Ben Bishop(City of Sebastian Representative) Jon W. Bates (Hotel Owner Representative) Cheryl Casano (Retail Representative) Kathryn Beatty-Self (Tourist Development Representative) Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board 3-vear term Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge Cookie Geyer (Public Education Community Representative) Pearl Jackson (Florida Association of Community Action Representative) Leland N. "Bud " Gibbs (Citizen Advocate and User representative) Utility Advisory Committee Frank Oberbeck (Adams/District 1 ) Andrew Allocco (Stanbridge/District 2 ) William C . Johnson (Macht/District 3 ) There was CONSENSUS to bring this matter forward to the next meeting . 14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT None . 14 . B . SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT None , January 9 , 2001 65 BK 8 0 b 5 14 . C . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD None . There being no further business , upon motion duly made and seconded , the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 11 : 20 a . m . ATTEST : Jeffrey K . Barton , Clerk Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman Minutes approv ell January 9 , 2001 6 PG 7 0 � 6