HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/5/2002MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman
Fran B. Adams
Caroline D. Ginn
Kenneth R Macht
District 2
District 4
District 1
District 5
District 3
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
BACKUP
PAGES
Comm. Kenneth R. Macht
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITIONS: 5. Proclamation for Veterans Day - November 11, 2002
9.A.1. Additional Backup
9.A.5. Additional Backup
9.B.3. Additional Backup
11.G.1. Additional Backup
I3.B. Tourist Development Council
PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of October 8, 2002
B. Regular Meeting of October 15, 2002
C. Regular Meeting of October 22, 2002
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received and placed on file in office of Clerk to the Board:
Sheriff's DUI Impoundment and Immobilization Trust
Fund Report for 4th Quarter of FY 2002
Clerk of Circuit Court, Constitutional Officers
Financial Report for FY Ending 09/30/02
(letter dated October 22, 2002)
Court Cost for Court Facilities Report for FY
Ending 09/30/02
BACKUP
PAGES
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated October 17, 2002) 5-16
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated October 24, 2002) 17-28
Investment Report
(memorandum dated October 29, 2002) 29-38
Federal Annual Certification Report
(letter dated October 24, 2002) 39-40
Submittal of Funds from Sheriff's Department
(letter dated October 25, 2002) 41-42
Donation of Surplus Computer Equipment
(memorandum dated October 22, 2002) 43-44
City of Sebastian Second Member MPO Appointments
(memorandum dated October 28, 2002) 45-46
2003 Holiday Schedule
(memorandum dated October 24, 2002) 47-48
Temporary Water Service Agreements — IRC and Ted
J.Kwarchak, Jr., and Mary Sue Kwarchak, Michael P.
and Lynn A. McKnight in San Sebastian Springs Unit IV
(memorandum dated September 13, 2002)
Authorized Bond Counsel to File Bond Validation for
Palms of Vero Beach, L P $1,500,000 Bond Issue
(memorandum dated October 30, 2002)
CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
N. Indian River County Extension Services Ad Hoc Comm.
(memorandum dated October 24, 2002)
Contract for Assistant County Attorney
(memorandum dated October 30, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGES
64-66
Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver
for Lot 3, Block 23, Vero Lake Estates, Unit 5A,
7845 90th Avenue
(memorandum dated October 22, 2002)
IRC Bid #5015 South County Water Plant Sodium
Hypochlorite Building
(memorandum dated October 23, 2002)
Courthouse Chiller Maintenance Contract Renewal
(memorandum dated October 25, 2002)
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Ercildoune Heights Subdivision Petition Water
Service — Resolution III
(memorandum dated October 25, 2002)
Poplar Development Inc.'s Request for Planned
Development (PD) Special Exception Use Approval
for a Project to be known as Abington Woods
Legislative
(memorandum dated October 28, 2002)
Florida Power and Light's Request for Special
Exception Use Approval for an Electrical Substation
Facihty Quasi Judicial
(memorandum dated October 28, 2002)
104-115
116-128
PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.):
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.):
4. Indian River County Hospital District's Request to
Rezone Approximately 3 50 Acres from RM -10 to
PD and Request to Approve the Conceptual PD
Plan for the Gifford Health Center Legislative
(memorandum dated October 29, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGES
129-144
Christian Outreach International, Inc.'s Request for
Special Exception and Conceptual Site Plan Approval
for a Retreat Center and Appeal of the Planning and
Zoning Commission's Denial of Major Site Plan
Approval for Phase I of the Retreat Center
Quasi Judicial
(memorandum dated October 29, 2002)
PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from Linda & Ron Spicer to Discuss
River Island Dock Permit
(e-mail received September 23, 2002)
Request from George J. Racicot to Discuss
Electric Code
(letter dated October 28, 2002)
145-168
3. Request to Discuss Westco Development
(letter dated october 17, 2002) 171-177
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Treasure Coast Sports Commission Agreement
(memorandum dated October 30, 2002)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
Emergency Services
None
General Services
None
178-187
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (coned.):
D. Leisure Services
None
Office of Management and Budget
None
Human Resources
None
BACKUP
PAGES
Public Works
1. Ecological Associates, Inc., Contract Amendment
No l
(memorandum dated October 24, 2002) 188-191
Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc.
Contract Amendment No. 3
(memorandum dated October 25, 2002)
Work Order #1 — Surveying Services -
Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc
(memorandum dated October 29, 2002)
192-204
205-211
Utilities
1. Sebastian Water Expansion Phase"s III -B and
III -C / Resolution P/ — Final Assessment
(memorandum dated October 28, 2002)
Human Services
None
212-216
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Updates
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd.):
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
E. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
BACKUP
PAGES
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
Solid Waste Disposal District
None
Environmental Control Board
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 10/22/02
Quarterly Report
(memorandum dated October 17, 2002) 217-220
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://www.ircgov.com
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00
p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m.
Meeting broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING NOVEMBER 11, 2002 AS VETERANS
DAY 2
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 8, 2002
6 B APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 15, 2002
6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 2002
CONSENT AGENDA 4
7.A. Reports 5
7 B Clerk of Circuit Court - Constitutional Officers Financial Report for FY
Ending 09/30/02 5
7.C. Court Cost for Court Facilities - FY Ending 09/30/02 6
7.D. Approval of Warrants 7
7 E Approval of Warrants 16
7.F. Clerk of Court - Investment Advisory Committee's Quarterly Report - July
- September 2002 25
7.G. Sheriff's Office - Federal Annual Certification Report Approval 26
7.H. Sheriff's Office - Constitutional Officers Financial Report for FY Ending
09/30/02 27
7.I. Clerk of Court's Donation of Surplus Computer Equipment to Gifford
Youth Activity Center 29
7.J. City of Sebastian - Councilman Ray Coniglio Appointed to Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) as their Second Member - Joe Barczyk
Appointed as Alternate 30
7.K. 2003 Holiday Schedule 31
7 L Temporary Water Service Agreements - Ted J. Kwarchak, Jr. and Mary Sue
Kwarchak, Michael P. and Lynn A. McKnight - San Sebastian Springs
Unit IV 32
7.M. The Palms of Vero Beach, L P - Bryant, Miller and Olive (Bond Counsel)
Authorized to File Bond Validation Proceeding in Leon County on Behalf
of Indian River County and Florida Housing Finance Corporation 33
7.N. Resolution No. 2002-093 - Establishing the Indian River County Extension
Services Ad Hoc Committee and Appointing Members 34
7.0. Employment Agreement with Assistant County Attorney Marian E Fell
37
7.P. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver - Lot 3, Block 23, Vero Lake
Estates, Unit 5A - 7845 90th Avenue - MGB Construction, Inc. 38
7.Q. Bid #5015 - South County Water Plant Sodium Hypochlorite Building -
Bids Rejected - Specifications to be Revised and Project Rebid 39
7.R. Courthouse Chiller Maintenance Contract Renewal - South Florida Trane
Service, Inc. 41
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION PETITION
WATER SERVICE - RESOLUTION III (NOT ADOPTED) 42
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ABINGTON WOODS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
(PD) SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL - REQUESTED BY POPLAR
DEVELOPMENT, INC. (Legislative) 46
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT - REQUEST FOR
SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR AN ELECTRICAL
SUBSTATION FACILITY (Quasi -Judicial) 54
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-028 - INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT (IRCHD)- REQUEST TO REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 3.50 ACRES FROM RM -10 TO PD AND APPROVE THE
CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN FOR THE GIFFORD HEALTH CENTER
(Legislative) 60
•
as
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL, INC. -
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
APPROVAL FOR A RETREAT CENTER AND APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF MAJOR SITE PLAN
APPROVAL FOR PHASE I OF THE RETREAT CENTER (Quasi-judicial) . 70
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM LINDA & RON SPICER TO
DISCUSS RIVER ISLAND DOCK PERMIT 85
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM GEORGE J RACICOT TO
DISCUSS ELECTRIC CODE 86
9 B 3 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF NICHOLAS F.
TSAMOUTALES TO DISCUSS WESTCO DEVELOPMENT - RIGHT-OF-
WAY ACQUISITION FRONTING WALGREEN'S AT ROSELAND ROAD
AND US# 1 87
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM 90
10. TREASURE COAST SPORTS COMMISSION CONCERNING
ORGANIZATION AND SCHEDULING SPORTING EVENTS AT
DODGERTOWN 90
11.G.1.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR SEA TURTLES
ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. - AMENDMENT NO. 1 (3 -YEAR
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT) 91
11.G.2. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN - DIAL CORDY AND ASSOCIATES,
INC. - CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 (BIOLOGICAL
MONITORING OF NEARSHORE REEF ENVIRONMENTS -
SECTORS 1 AND 2) 93
11.G.3. LAWSON, NOBLE & WEBB, INC - SURVEYING SERVICES - WORK
ORDER #1 (ANNUAL SURVEYING AND MAPPING SERVICES) . 94
11.H.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-094 - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION
PHASES III -B AND III -C - RESOLUTION IV - FINAL ASSESSMEN796
13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - FDEP APPLICATIONS - DEADLINE
FOR WATER PROJECT APPLICATIONS AND HOUSE BILL 851 .. 99
4
f
3
Gti
13 B TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL - COMMISSIONER GINN
APPOINTED TO SERVE 100
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 100
14 B SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 100
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD 101
R4
November 5, 2002
The Board of County Commissioners ofIndian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25t" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, November 5, 2002. Present were Ruth Stanbridge, Chairman; John W. Tippin,
Vice Chairman; Commissioners Fran B. Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht.
Also present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County
Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Dr. Fred Foy Strang, First Presbyterian Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Macht led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Stanbridge announced the addition of Item 5., Proclamation for Veterans
Day - November 11, 2002, and additional backup information on Items 9.A.1, 9.A.5., 9 B 3 ,
and 11.G.1.
November 5, 2002
1
rIr
Ulk
•
ds .< a.:. . S. a«.. .t .. [-.efe'. vs .'�
Vice Chairman Tippin requested the addition of Item 13 B Concerning the Tourist
Development Council.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously made the above
changes to the agenda.
5. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING NOVEMBER 11, 2002 AS
VETERANS DAY
The Chairman read the following proclamation and presented it to Leland Gibbs &
Joseph Marona, Secretary of the Veterans Council.
1
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING NOVEMBER 11, 2002
AS VETERANS DAY
WHEREAS, on May 13, 1928, Congress approved an Act designating November 11th as
Armistice Day, commemorating the end of World War I and paying tribute to the heroes of that
war; and
WHEREAS, on June 1, 1954, Congress approved an Act changing the name of Armistice
Day to Veterans Day in order to also pay tribute to the veterans of World War II and veterans of
all wars, who have contributed so much to the preservation of our Nation and
WHEREAS, over 32,000 veterans of all wars presently reside in Indian River County,
which is host to 36 veteran organizations; and
WHEREAS, local veterans, individually and collectively as members of veteran
organizations, contribute in many ways to the welfare and betterment of the social, cultural and
economic life of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Indian River County Veterans Council consisting of representatives from
various City and County veteran organizations annually observe Veterans Day, as well as all
patriotic observance days, by holding ceremonies at Memorial Island in Vero Beach.
November 5, 2002
2
(74
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that November 11, 2002 be
designated as
VETERANS DAY
in Indian River County, and the Board urges all residents to fly the American flag to pay tribute
to all veterans living and deceased.
Adopted this 5th day of November, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Mr. Marona extended thanks to the Board of County Commissioners for the
Proclamation on behalf of the Veterans Council. He also welcomed Mr. Gibbs back as
President.
Mr. Gibbs appreciated the proclamation and reminded everyone that next Monday,
at 10:30 a.m. there would be a community event to pay tribute to veterans. He expressed
appreciation to the Elections Department and the Board of County Commissioners for
making it easier to vote in Indian River County.
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 8, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of October 8, 2002. There were none.
November 5, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the minutes
of October 8, 2002, as written and distributed.
6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 15, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of October 15, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the minutes
of October 15, 2002, as written and distributed.
6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of October 22, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting of October 22, 2002 as written and
distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that items 7.0. and 7.Q. be separated from the
Consent Agenda for discussion.
November 5, 2002
4
1)
tvA
•
1.
7.A. Reports
The following report was received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the
Board:
Sheriff's DUI Impoundment and Immobilization Trust Fund
Report for 4' Quarter of FY 2002.
NO ACTION REQUIRED
7.B. Clerk of Circuit Court- Constitutional Officers Financial Report
for FY Ending 09/30/02
The Board reviewed a letter of October 22, 2002:
October 22, 2002
The Honorable Board of County Comissioners ` ` E C E �" E 0
m
Indian River County OCT 2 4 2002
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 CLERK TO THE BOARD
Dear Commissioners:
Pursuant to Section 218.36, Florida Statutes, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River
County, Florida, respectfully submits the Constitutional Officers Financial Report for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2002.
The excess fees were greater than we anticipated because the recording fees far exceeded
what we budgeted. When we prepared the budget in August of 2001, we anticipated a
slow down in the economy with a corresponding slow down in construction. The decline
in interest rates and the strong construction over the past year resulted in significantly
higher recording fees. We anticipated recording fees of $669,000 and actually received
more than $1,000,000.
My check for $579, 479.45 was hand delivered on October 22, 2002. This check
represents excess fees and unexpended funds.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey K. Barton-)
Clerk of Circuit Court
November 5, 2002
•
5
1
54,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously acknowledged
receipt of Clerk of Court Jeffrey K. Barton's check in the
amount of $579,479.45 which was hand -delivered on October
22, 2002, representing excess fees and unexpended funds.
7. C. Court Cost for Court Facilities - FY Ending 09/30/02
The Board reviewed the following report:
COURT COST FOR COURT FACILITIES
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEP "I'EMBER 30, 2002
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
A. Receipts from:
Beginning fund balance from the current fiscal year $1,116.15
Payments of Additional Court Costs $16,909.90
Interest Earnings $317.98
B. Budget and actual expenditures for the:
Acquisition of land, easements, and right of way for the $0.00
Construction of courthouses and court related -buildings $0.00
The construction, repair, or maintenance of, or improvements $0.00
to court facilities.
The annual report shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners, the Chief Judge of the
Judicial Circuit and the Administration Commission.
Reference: F.S. 939.18
Court Cost for Court Facilities
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
November 5, 2002
6
Fy
-i
S
jy
s
•
7.D. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a memorandum of October 17, 2002:
•
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: October 17, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of October 11, 2002 to October 17, 2002.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
October 11-17, 2002, as requested.
CHECK
NUMBER
0331883
0331884
0331885
0331886
0331887
0331888
0331889
0331890
0331891
0331892
0331893
0331894
0331895
0331896
0331897
0331898
0331899
0331900
0331901
November 5, 2002
NAME
CHECK
DATE
AMERICAN CONCRETE INDUSTRIES,
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER, INC
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
APOLLO ENTERPRISES
ALBERTSON'S
ACT INC
ABC PRINTING CO
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
AUTO SUPPLY CO WEST
ABERNATHY, DONALD
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC
BEVERAGE STOP, THE
BELLSOUTH
BRADFORD, MADGE A
BREVARD ORTHHOPAEDIC CLINIC
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF IRC
7
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
CHECK
AMOUNT
420.00
108.22
566.94
1,421.92
749.86
1,306.95
17,259.80
23.14
124.90
333.71
72.92
89.00
4.68
11,559.90
110.00
1,682.10
199.50
152.00
2,848.41
•
CHECK
NUMBER
033190
033190
033190
033190
033190
033190
033190
033190
0331910
0331911
0331912
0331913
0331914
0331915
0331916
0331917
0331918
0331919
0331920
0331921
0331922
0331923
0331924
0331925
0331926
0331927
0331928
0331929
0331930
0331931
0331932
0331933
0331934
0331935
0331936
0331937
0331938
0331939
0331940
0331941
0331942
0331943
0331944
0331945
0331946
0331947
0331948
0331949
0331950
0331951
0331952
0331953
0331954
0331955 H
0331956
0331957
0331958
NAME
2 BELLSOUTH INTELLIVENTURES
3 BELLSOUTH
4 CAMERON & BARKLEY CO
5 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
6 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
7 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
8 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
9 CLARKS, DOROTHEA
CLEM, POLACKWICH AND VOCELLE
CALL ONE, INC
COOK, TERRY
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS &
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
DIVERSIFIED DRILLING CORP
DIAL, CORDY & ASSOCIATES INC
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
ELPEX, INC
EWING, MARSHA
ECOTECB CONSULTANTS, INC
ELLIS, KENNETH SCOTT
EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
FEDEX
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
FIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC
FLORIDA BOLT AND NUT CO
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CODE
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
FIRST UNION
FREEMAN, PAUL H
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
GENERAL GMC, TRUCK
GENE'S AUTO GLASS
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
GEISLER-STEINER, MARCIA J
GAGEL, SALOI
GENE'S MASONRY, INC
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
IGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
HEALTHSOUTH INDIAN RIVER
HEALTHSOUTH HOLDINGS
HEALTH FIRST TRAINING CENTER
November 5, 2002
CHECK
DATE
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
CHECK
AMOUNT
20.00
2,430.00
180.93
10,253.42
1,485.00
1,231.25
42,169.06
20.88
684.52
25.00
77.72
26.00
57.00
1,283.45
2,420.46
736.26
850.50
288.00
469.00
56.00
106,549.94
3,500.00
7,251.31
142.00
25.63
89.50
13.00
2,916.67
28.71
1,696.67
178.95
147.35
2,217.00
4,908.16
5,187.01
5,297.40
5.15
150.00
1,717.00
3,125.94
39.00
24,363.33
57,522.63
23.64
1,679.31
205.00
199.60
17.50
150.00
890.00
114.52
22.50
63.00
15.00
418.60
166.00
55.00
8
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0331959 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 331960 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 331961 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
0331962 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
INITY
0331963 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
0331964 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
0331965
0331966
0331967
0331968
0331969
0331970
0331971
0331972
0331973
0331974
O 331975
O 331976
0331977
O 331978
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
YMAINTENANCE
INTERNATIONAL GOLF
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDUSTRIAL CONTAINER SEER ICES
INDIAN RIVER HAND ER
JIFFY PHOTO CENTER
KELLY TRACTOR CO
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES,
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
KELLY TRACTOR CO
KAUFFMANN, ALAN
KEMIRON INC
KEITH JR, GARY
INC
O 331979 LENGEMANN OF FLORIDA, INC
0331980 LUCAS WATERPROOFING CO, INC
0331981 L B SMITH, INC
0331982 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
0331983 LETTS, DAVID
0331984 L&P FINANCIAL SERVICES
0331985 LOPOLITO, STEPHEN
0331986 LANDERS & PARSONS, PA
0331987 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
0331988 MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES
0331989 MIKES GARAGE
0331990 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDER
0331991 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
0331992 MARTIN, CRISTI
0331993 METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA,
0331994
0331995
0331996
0331997
0331998
0331999
0332000
O 332001
O 332002
0332003
O 332004
O 332005
O 332006
O 332007
0332008
O 332009 PITNEY BOWES, DINC PHD
0332010 PETRILLAr
0332011 PRO SELECT SPORTS USA
0332012 PORT CONSOLIDATED
0332013 PLEZALL WIPERS, INC
0332014 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
0332015 PHELPS, PAMELA G
0332016 PAIN & ANESTHESIA, PA
MATHESON, EDWARD G, ESQ
MONTEJO, EDWARD MD
NUPRAy, J W JACK JR CFE
MUNIS INC
MONACO, JACK
MELCHIORI, MATT
MCFAGUE, MD RICHARD F
'NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
NEPA
NORYCH & TALLIS A/S/O
NEUROLOGIC CONSULTANTS PA
OGILVIE, LIONEL H
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
p RRINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
INC
CLI
November 5, 2002
9
CHECK
DATE
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
CHECK
AMOUNT
107,335.02
17,155.00
96.50
155.00
383.30
1,495.00
29,187.00
76,100.67
1,115.75
3.00
700.92
84.60
4.20
333.31
17,322.75
53.56
2,503.65
30.00
1,041.70
210.00
190.00
2,400.00
309.85
411.05
247.00
651.00
42.34
3,665.80
8.10
53.72
205.00
83.80
366.00
203.00
3,371.50
100.00
63.00
3,855.36
25,052.56
75.00
177.68
690.00
4,136.80
91.06
269.73
2,425.26
8.00
17.40
554.14
114.63
295.00
500.00
33.14
17,748.43
119.25
207.11
105.00
191.60
w
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0332017
0332018
0332019
0332020
0332021
0332022
0332023
0332024
0332025
0332026
0332027
0332028
0332029
0332030
0332031
0332032
0332033
0332034
0332035
0332036
0332037
0332038
0332039
0332040
0332041
0332042
0332043
0332044
0332045
0332046
0332047
0332048
0332049
0332050
0332051
0332052
'0332053
0332054
0332055
0332056
0332057
0332058
0332059
0332060
0332061
0332062
0332063
0332064
0332065
0332066
0332067
NAME
PARALEE COMPANY INC
PBS AD SPECIALTIES INC
RINKER MATERIALS
ROSELAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
RODNEY HALL HOUSE MOVING INC
RICOTTA, JOSEPHINE A
ROBERTSON, SHARON -CLERK OF
SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
SEARS COMMERICAL ONE
STARCK, DONNA
STAN MILLER & ASSOCIATES
SUNCOAST COUNSELING &
SPEIRS, DONNA
SORIANO, SORCIRE
SEYMOUR, LINDA
STEPHENS & ASSOCIATES, INC
SCOTT'S TREE SERVICE INC
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT
SEQUOIA VOTING SYSTEMS INC
SOUTHERN RUSH INC.
SCHRECK, AMY J REPORTING
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC
TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES
TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FL
TAP SOD
SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST
TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC
TECHHEALTH INC/HELLER HEALTHCA
TESTAMERICA INC
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
URGENT CARE WEST
UNISHIPPERS
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE
VERO BEACH LINCOLN MERCURY INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
VERO LAKE ESTATES VOLUNTEER
VERO ORTHOPAEDICS
VERO BEARING & BOLT
VERO HERITAGE, INC
WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
WAL-MART PHARMACY INC
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE
XEROX CORPORATION
MCALLISTER, PHILIP
November 5, 2002
10
CHECK
DATE
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
2002-10-17
n
CHECK
AMOUNT
375.00
393.00
2,400.00
9.00
11,230.00
900.00
104.88
7.00
44.00
89.90
1,345.00
7.54
8.49
10,458.95
1,550.00
35.00
10.90
288.50
125.00
275.00
7,250.00
50,000.00
500.00
14.00
42,246.51
2,695.00
18.99
73.33
6,357.00
6,236.52
471.84
172.58
1,536.00
21,162.53
1,386.00
28.43
1,209.72
26.00
143.51
3,299.91
732.50
4.00
384.70
283.92
300.00
16.58
539.48
49.50
2,875.36
207.62
100.36
839/.218.71
P`
•
CHECK NBR
100243
100244
100245
100246
100247
100248
100249
100250
100251
100252
100253
100254
100255
100256
100257
100258
100259
100260
100261
100262
100263
100264
100265
100266
100267
100268
100269
100270
100271
100272
100273
100274
100275
100276
100277
100278
100279
100280
100281
100282
100283
100284
100285
100286
100287
100288
100289
100290
100291
100292
100293
100294
100295
100296
100297
100298
100299
100300
CK DATE
10/15/2002
10/15/2002
10/15/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
November 5, 2002
VENDOR
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE CO
KAY CLEM
ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
ADT SECURITY SERVICES
AERO PRODUCTS CORP
FLORIDA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE AND
AHEAD HEADGEAR INC
ALL POWER SERVICES INC
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION
AMRICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ANCESTRAL TRACKS
APCO INTERNATIONAL, INC
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
AQUAGENIX
ARCH WIRELESS
ARTHUR J GALLAGHER & COMPANY
ASCE/MEMBERSHIP
AT&T BROADBAND
AUTO SUPPLY OF VERO BEACH INC
AUTO SUPPLY WEST
B/C B/S OF FL
B/C B/S OF FL
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
JEFFRY K BARTON CLERK
BELLSOUTH
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
BERNAN
BEVERAGE STOP
BLACKHAWK QUARRY CO OF FLA INC
MICHAEL BRANDES
BREATHING AIR SYSTEMS DIVISION
BREVARD COUNTY
RONALD BRISKIE
BROADWAY -MANHATTAN PUBLISHING
BRODART VIDEO
BUSINESS NEWS PUBLISHING
BUSHNELL CORPORATION
JOYCE JOHNSTON CARLSON
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL & BEHAVIORAL
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CITY COURIER SERVICE
CLEANNET USA
CLEARFIELD CO
CLEVELAND GOLF
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE
COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL
FLORIDA DEPT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM
CUSTOM CARRIAGES INC
DADE PAPER COMPANY
DATA SUPPLIES INC
DAVES COMMUNICATIONS INC
DAY TIMERS INC
VENDOR NBR AMOUNT
1074 816.32
1076 156.26
1595 3,039.70
1572 158.00
1572 267.00
280 88.28
8 1,921.60
1584 2,865.51
515 934.55
11 3,928.00
1603 150.00
1585 71730
1586 115.75
1188 225.00
251 780.97
1097 63.06
1605 281.00
1259 60.32
1433 214,968.00
1251 235.00
1258 39.95
46 1,426.2.7
665 204.01
1230 5,351.99
1230 41,120.24
616 3,858.63
1162 242.Y
1022 2,907.50
1292 1,397.50
255 6.00
363 23.00
1606 10.00
10 450.59
1587 4,500.00
133 1,656.00
1720 25.00
1758 491.22
1588 34.94
437 74..34
1607 40.00
1589 881.19
1568 141.92
602 317.11
1157 57.00
1759 52,080.94
1725 25.00
1265 25,125.71
203 1,009.28
1590 50536
131 267.08
49 68.25
1253 175.00
1591 2.50
567 15;.19
306 :.20
265 ..32.79
37 20...00
1608 13.95
•
11
CHECK NBR
100301
100302
100303
100304
100305
100306
100307
100308
100309
100310
100311
100312
100313
100314
100315
100316
100317
100318
100319
100320
100321
100322
100323
100324
100325
100326
100327
100328
100329
100330
100331
100332
100333
100334
100335
100336
100337
100338
100339
100340
100341
100342
100343
100344
100345
100346
100347
100348
100349
100350
100351
100352
100353
100354
100355
100356
100357
100358
100359
100360
CK DATE
10/172002
10/172002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/172002
10/172002
10/172002
10/172002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/172002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
November 5, 2002
VENDOR
DEMCO INC
DEPENDABLE DODGE INC
DICKERSON FLORIDA INC
DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH
DON SMITHS PAINT STORE
DOWNTOWN DISCOUNT PRODUCE INC
E -Z BREW COFFEE & BOTTLE WATER SVC
EGP INC
EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC
EXPEDI 1 ER, THE
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO
FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE
FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION
FLORIDA AQUATIC PLANT MGT SOCIETY
FLORIDA AQUATIC PLANT MGMT SOCIETY
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY EMS
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES INC
FLORIDA CITY & COUNTY MGT ASSOC
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD CO LLC
FLORIDA FIRE MARSHALS & INSPECTORS
FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY
FOOTJOY
FT PIERCE COCA-COLA
PAUL W GALLAGHER
GEM -DANDY, INC
HARRIS SANITATION INC
HARRIS SANITATION INC
CARLITA HARVEY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT
HULIO HERNANDEZ
HILL-DONNELLY CORPORATION
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLY
HUNTERDON HOUSE
IBM
IAQ ASSOCIATION INC
INDIAN RIVER BA 11 LRY
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
KANO LABORATORIES INC
ERIC C KURTZ MD PA
GERALD LEBEAU
BRUCE LEIFER
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
STEPHEN LOPOLITO
LOWES CO INC
MARRIOTT FT LAUDERDALE NORTH
MARTIN PETROCHEMICAL
MATRX MEDICAL INC
MAX DAVIS & ASSOCIATES
KEITH MCCULLY
PETER MCLEOD
MATT MELCHIORI
SANTOS MENDEZ
METEORLOGIX
MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE
NEOPOST
OGIO
OFFICE DEPOT INC
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICES INC
12
VENDOR NBR AMOUNT
192 395.64
38 313.13
109 80.53
1731 22,271.00
158 260.02
706 180.91
138 78.50
424 250.00
7 3,914.83
564 56.39
478 647.78
1761 10,000.00
1260 3,703.78
1563 85.00
1609 20.00
1573 60.00
1272 125.00
848 16,235.00
1613 325.00
1202 8,460.00
1575 195.00
1614 180.00
159 93.40
1593 3,791.92
160 768.75
1594 80.00
1565 464.08
640 25.00
640 19.55
1652 25.72
1023 140.00
1631 1,380.51
1567 230.82
236 822.92
1570 37.50
1571 50.00
1257 1,245.00
139 645.85
1247 2,264.54
191 70.92
804 1,200.00
1651 47.00
928 521.00
100 119.00
1653 16.24
687 1,601.59
1566 362.25
503 1,414.97
78 2,186.68
432 72.00
1576 12.00
1569 8120
1579 36.05
1578 730.00
1577 4,032.00
233 130.00
286 1,03620
1580 511.20
683 1,182.83
820 5,428.81
r
•
CHECK NBR
100361
100362
100363
100364
100365
100366
100367
100368
100369
100370
100371
100372
100373
100374
100375
100376
100377
100378
100379
100380
100381
100382
100383
100384
100385
100386
100387
100388
100389
100390
100391
100392
100393
100394
100395
100396
100397
100398
100399
100400
100401
100402
100403
100404
100405
100406
100407
100408
100409
100410
100411
100412
100413
100414
100415
100416
100417
100418
100419
100420
CK DATE
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
November 5, 2002
VENDOR
ON ITS WAY
PAK MAIL
PALM BEACH LINCOLN MERCURY
PAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING CO
PARK'S RENTAL & SALES INC
PAST PERFECT FLORIDA HISTORY INC
PERCONTI DATA SYSTEMS INC
PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
PETTY CASH -JILL KREBBS
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
PRESS JOURNAL
PROQUEST INFORMATION AND LEARNING
PUBLIX PHARMACY
PUBLIX PHARMACY
R & G SOD FARMS
RECORDED BOOKS
ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET INC
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE INC
DAVID P RUPPERT L L C
SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
SARA V DILLON
SCOTTS SPORTING GOODS
SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY CO
SEWELL HARDWARE
SHERATON ORLANDO NORTH HOTEL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF
SIGNS IN A DAY
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY
SORCIRI SORIANO
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTORS INC
SPALDING
ST JOHN'S RIVER WATER MGMT DISTRICT
LARRY STEPHENS
LARRY STEPHENS
STORAGE SOLUTIONS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD
SUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES LP
SUN BELT MEDICAL
SYSCO FOOD SERVICE
TARGET STORES
TED ANDERSEN MASONORY
TIDEWATER VIRGINIA FAMILEES
JOHN W TIPPIN
TOTAL TRUCK PARTS
TRANSIT AC
TREASURE COAST HUMAN RESOURCES CONE
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
TREASURE COAST TRAVEL AGENCY INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY SERVICE
VERMEER SOUTHEAST SALES & SERVICE
CITY OF VERO BEACH
VERO BEARING & BOLT
13
VENDOR NBR AMOUNT
1581 458.10
738 57.88
405 15.36
51 2,015.03
30 77.00
1636 891.50
1365 31,000.00
342 39.95
1143 4.01
1155 126.00
1155 148.00
974 133.35
1218 6,657.00
1397 90.00.
1397 80.90
575 55.00
653 450.80
- 238 265.30
740 137.60
1037 181.16
1478 2,015.33
87 105.70
747 600.00
75 145.00
855 36.58
113 85.14
1574 356.00
1145 150.00
1145 7,572.25
606 60.00
1612 70.00
1654 22.02
172 570.70
1435 3,108.16
1760 700.00
1227 110.60
1227 57.40
984 231.54
1250 6,011.11
35 146.81
1449 657.02
796 3,455.27
263 558.38
1 20.66
1275 650.00
1522 25.00
1649 18.27
1592 400.88
719 96.06
1650 139.00
174 253.55
1647 377.00
1119 11.08
1564 500.00
391 11,270.54
1583 18,117.36
1583 1,300.00
83 8,160.00
1028 60.00
428 164.33
Lak.1
•
CHECK NBR
100421
100422
100423
100424
100425
100426
100427
100428
100429
100430
100431
100432
100433
100434
100435
100436
100437
100438
100439
100440
100441
100442
100443
100444
100445
100446
100447
100448
100449
100450
100451
100452
100453
100454
100455
100456
100457
100458
100459
100460
100461
100462
100463
100464
100465
100466
100467
100468
100469
100470
100471
100472
100473
100474
100475
100476
100477
100478
100479
100480 1
CK DATE
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
0/172002
November 5, 2002
VENDOR
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER
VESTERHEIM MUSEUMSBUTIKK
WAL MART
WASTE NEWS
WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS
WESTCOAST LONG BEACH HOTEL
WILLOW BEND BOOKS & FAMILY
SUSAN B WILSON
WOODYS PRINTING
XEROX CORP
XEROX CORP
MATTHEW ACHORN
DENNIS E ACKER
VIRGIL ADAMS
AMERITREND HOMES
K ANUKITPHANIT & JANREAM NYASS
GASPAR APARISIO
ATTIC 60
ERSKANE BANGHART
BEACH COVE PROPERTIES INC
ROBERT & ELENA BEAUREGARD
CAROL E BENDER
KATHLEEN BENNETT
KENNETH & SHIRLEY BERRY
GLADYS BRADY
KAREN FAY BROWN
BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION
ALIDA BURGOS
CAL BUILDERS
CAPP CUSTOM HOMES
CHAD CARROLL
JEFFREY CLUNN
TRISTRAM COLKET
BRONWEN/JEAN CHARLE COMPAGNON
COMPLETE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
CONTRAVEST CONSTRUCTION CO
ROBERT CORNETT
JOHN CRANKFIELD
CROOM CONSTRUCTION
CAROLE CROWDER
FRANK CROWDER
DALE L CUNNINGHAM
KRISTI DAMPIER
JAMES W DAVIS
WAYNE AND LISA DEITLE
PAUL DI THOMAS
LORRAINE FERA
JOAN FILOSA
THOMAS FINNERAN
DONALD FITZPATRICK SR
ANDRE FREDELING
RENEE FREEMAN
IAN R FUTTER
ERNEST GALLO
ARTURO GARCIA
ARTURO GARCIA
WILLIAM J GEIDNER
GHO VERO BEACH INC
CAROLA GIL
STEVEN P GRAB
14
VENDOR NBR AMOUNT
201 224.94
1557 53.50
1543 57.44
1561 39.00
352 300.00
1648 151.20
188 236.03
1562 5944
217 465.28
591 382.58
682 416.00
1751 36.84
1673 32.52
1674 50.11
1764 28.78
1717 3.46
1716 41.82
1715 159.98
1714 90.13
1718 3.29
1738 39.55
1682 20.57
1659 6.82
1698 29.53
1707 15.95
1642 22.39
1644 105.80
1697 22.65
1766 28.86
1787 8.85
1743 29.77
1665 24.16
1726 26.11
1734 83.79
1687 52.92
1721 252.85
1723 35.60
1686 7838
1646 50.86
1724 43.40
1749 18.57
1705 79.85
1754 40.96
1656 7.15
1756 42.50
1769 9.59
1737 13.27
1741 10.47
1685 36.30
1770 5.11
1744 10.76
1771 4.80
1664 50.22
1773 57.94
1645 99.79
1774 26.41
1732 19.29
1676 43.85
1740 37.44
1704 53.10
CON-
•
CHECK NBR
100481
100482
100483
100484
100485
100486
100487
100488
100489
100490
100491
100492
100493
100494
100495
100496
100497
100498
100499
100500
100501
100502
100503
100504
100505
100506
100507
100508
100509
100510
100511
100512
100513
100514
100515
100516
100517
100518
100519
100520
100521
100522
100523
100524
100525
100526
100527
100528
100529
100530
100531
100532 1
100533 1
100534 1
100535 1
100536 1
100537 1
100538 1
100539 1
100540 1
CK DATE
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
0/17/2002
November 5, 2002
VENDOR
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
STEPHANIE HALL
BRETT & AMANDA HAMLIN
HARBOR INSURANCE AGENCY INC
MAX HENRY SR
WILLIAM B HENSICK
FRANK HINZMAN
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
GENEVA HOLMES
JOSEPH HOOKER
MARY R HUBERET
BOBBY & CAROLYN HUFF
INDIAN RIVER MALL
CHARLES M INFANTE
BECKY INMAN
RENEE JAROSZ
JILL KAMARAUSKAS
JOHN KNOEPPEL
LISA ANN KOMMER
CLIFFORD & MARY RUTH KRAMER
LANGFELDER JENNIFER
MARION B & RENO B LONG
ROBERT K LUCAS
MATTONE JOSEPH
MCM CORP
SCOTT M MCQUIRE
RONALD & TAMMY MEEKS
MERCEDES HOMES INC
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
DANIEL MITCHELL
BARBARA J & L PAUL NALLE
BRION J NEALON
SYDNEY OLIVER
CARMEN PAQUETTE
PARK PLACE MHC
AMY PARKS
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
LINDA PAULEY
DAVID PEACOCK
ANGELA PEDOTA
PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION
LAURA PETERSEN
ELVIS PIERCE
MARIE C PIERRE
KENNETH & DOROTHY POHLNER
SHEILA PRATER
PRIME OUTLETS AT VERO BEACH
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO INC
R PLACE BEAUTY SALON
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
BARBARA REILLY
ROBERT ROBB
STACI ROBINSON
PEGGY SCHWEY RITTER
FELICIA SCOTT
SEA OAKS INVESTMENT LTD
SEA OAKS INVESTNErNT
MARK L SMITH
MARY SNOWDEN
15
VENDOR NBR AMOUNT
1669 26.91
1775 11.93
1736 9.82
1708 14.65
1735 56.06
1668 39.72
1671 1.21
1693 44.51
1662 311.50
1776 9.59
1777 47.35
1700 36.97
1694 36.96
1684 77.69
1722 52.75
1779 17.36
1748 30.53
1706 28.81
1710 62.47
1689 93.21
1680 36.71
1747 57.0E
1657 ,2.69
1711 29.42
1780 36.13
1781 11.73
1739 57.41
1670 26.45
1666 99.05
1678 34.38
1639 33.28
1719 105.98
1730 20.65
1695 56.08
1712 85.28
1713 8327
1733 36.31
1691 100.00
1742 17.84
1677 20.13
1782 37.15
1679 17.00
1746 39.02
1727 34.26
1752 65.29
1702 38.99
1667 9.42
1672 375.57
1660 85.60
1701 14.64
1655 284.19
1729 41.57
1688 12.85
1709 26.58
1675 76.92
1690 19.21
1699 50.37
1783 47.15
1696 36.28
1681 71.54
•
CHECK NBR
100541
100542
100543
100544
100545
100546
100547
100548
100549
100550
100551
100552
Grand Total:
CK DATE
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
10/172002
10/17/2002
VENDOR
JUDY AND RALPH TATONE
WILLIE J TAYLOR
JOHN C & DANNETTE TRUCKNER
ROSEMARY URBAN PENN
VENTURE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PHILIP E VITELLO
BEVERLY AND MICHAEL WARD
WILLIAM HENSICK & SONS
WINDSOR PROPERTIES, INC
MEE WULF
GRAIG YOUNG M
STEVEN ZANIEWSKI & NICOLE GERACIAND
7. E. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 2002:
VENDOR NBR
1753
1750
1703
1784
1785
1661
1786
1640
1658
1755
1641
1745
AMOUNT
74.84
58.12
1.92
60.56
345.00
52.31
37.15
44.07
62.19
4.79
9.34
17.11
597,798.14
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: October 24, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR, FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of October 18, 2002 to October 24, 2002.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
October 18-24, 2002, as requested.
November 5, 2002
16
I L.
r
5
4
•
VENDOR NBR CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR
1057 4 10/23/2002 ICMA RET CORP
100553 10/23/2002 BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
100554 10/23/2002 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
100555 10/23/2002 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS CO
100556 10/23/2002 FL SDU
100557 10/23/2002 HYATT REGENCY ORLANDO INTERNATIONAL
100558 10/23/2002 I R C BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
100559 10/23/2002 I R FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
100560 10/23/2002 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
10/23/2002 KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIAN
10/23/2002 NACO/SOUTHEAST
10/23/2002 SALEM TRUST COMPANY
10/23/2002 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
10/23/2002 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
10/23/2002 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION #769
10/23/2002 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION #769
10/23/2002 V B FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC
10/24/2002 A A FIRE EQULPMENT INC
10/24/2002 ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
10/24/2002 ACTION DIESEL
10/24/2002 FRANK J ADAMSKI JR
10/24/2002 ALL FLORIDA REALTY SERVICE INC
10/24/2002 TERESA ALLEN
10/24/2002 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
10/24/2002 AM ENGINEERING AND TESTING INC
10/24/2002 AMAZON.COM
10/24/2002 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF
10/24/2002 AMERICAN RED CROSS
10/24/2002 AMERICAN ROD & GUN
10/24/2002 AMERIGAS
10/24/2002 AMERITREND HOMES
10/24/2002 PETER & IVE 1 i b ANDERSON
10/24/2002 ANDO BUILDERS
10/24/2002 RANIRO ANGELONE
10/24/2002 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
10/24/2002 ART KRIEGER CONSTRUCTION
10/24/2002 ARTS & CRAFTS SHOW BUSINESS
10/24/2002 KEN OR DIANN ASTON
10/24/2002 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
10/24/2002 ATLANTIC FORD TRUCK SALES INC
10/24/2002 AUTO SUPPLY OF VERO BEACH INC
10/24/2002 AUTO SUPPLY WEST
10/24/2002 DAVID AND LISA BAILEY
10/24/2002 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
10/24/2002 KENNETH J BAKOS SR
10/24/2002 JEFFRY K BARTON CLERK
10/24/2002 ROBERT N BASKIN
10/24/2002 MARK & PAMELA BELL
10/24/2002 BELLSOUTH
10/24/2002 BELLSOUTH
10/24/2002 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
10/24/2002 BILKEN GROUP
10/24/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE INC/LISTENING LIBRARY
10/24/2002 BILL BOWDEN
10/24/2002 BOYNTON PUMP AND SUPPLY
10/24/2002 MADGE A BRADFORD
10/24/2002 BREVARD COUNTY
10/24/2002 BRODART VIDEO
1062
1069
1075
1086
2017
1066
1071
1059
1058
1080
1081
1084
1060
1079
1079
1070
529
199
274
1934
884
1911
190
1808
790
1763
1805
462
1114
1764
1968
1904
1866
1097
1900
1812
1910
543
93
46
665
1918
616
1991
1022
1880
1930
1292
1292
255
1796
425
1924
268
1873
1720
437
November 5, 2002
100561
100562
100563
100564
100565
100566
100567
100568
100569
100570
100571
100572
100573
100574
100575
100576
100577
100578
100579
100580
100581
100582
100583
100584
100585
100586
100587
100588
100589
100590
100591
100592
100593
100594
100595
100596
100597
100598
100599
100600
100601
100602
100603
100604
100605
100606
100607
100608
100609
17
ui
AMOUNT
19,469.91
92.31
639.86
175.17
9,344.01
135.00
190.00
79,958.90
50.00
138.50
9,514.10
132.25
132.46
37.75
1,750.00
4,224.00
2,500.00
95.15
348.41
398.50
50.31
465.00
97.14
10.78
136.00
130.85
100.00
245.00
92.49
10.50
35.62
60.70
39.50
594.00
36.93
32.52
12.00
41.79
201.00
31,774.00
1,067.01
34.31
37.99
3,981.60
20.27
3,450.50
48.77
54.50
274.53
9,986.08
12.50
137.50
219.20
42.69
4.60
325.50
4.00
1,383.17
•
VENDOR NBR
1917
1644
1813
1814
1940
1766
1951
1834
602
1818
1945
1190
2014
1815
2019
1157
229
1929
528
1955
131
1894
1870
710
49
1816
1916
1192
1089
1646
1892
1604
1959
1869
1795
1797
265
243
1931
1794
1902
1195
136
192
38
1908
109
1099
1872
1977
1946
1944
336
1960
424
476
1871
2020
7
564
November 5, 2002
CHECK NBR
100610
100611
100612
100613
100614
100615
100616
100617
100618
100619
100620
100621
100622
100623
100624
100625
100626
100627
100628
100629
100630
100631
100632
100633
100634
100635
100636
100637
100638
100639
100640
100641
100642
100643
100644
100645
100646
100647
100648
100649
100650
100651
100652
100653
100654
100655
100656
100657
100658
100659
100660
100661
100662
100663
100664
100665
100666
100667
100668
100669
CK DATE
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24,2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
VENDOR
CRAIG AND JACQUELYN BROWN
BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION
BURKE'S PEERAGE & GENTRY(UK)LIMITED
BUSINESS REFEREBCE SERVICES
DEBRA CADIEUS L
CAL BUILDERS
JOSEPH CARBONE
RON CAROTHERS
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
KELLEY CARTER
DIONNE CARTER MATHIS
CHRIS CASSINARI
CAT FANCY
LARRY E CAVER JR
TOM CAVILL
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL & BEHAVIORAL
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO INC
CHANNING CORP XXIX
CHUCKS NEWS STAND
ROY W CLEMENTS III
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE
ANGELA COLLEY
ROBERT COLLINS
COLUMBIA HOUSE
COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL
CONGRESSIONAL DIGEST CORPORATION
GARY CONKLIN
ANDREW COSENZA
CPE & ASSOCIATES
CROOM CONSTRUCTION
MARY CROSBY
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF IRC
LAURA CUPILLARI
ROBERT CURTIS
DORENE CYPERS
WIT LIAM & ROSIE DARNELL
DATA SUPPLIES INC
DAVES SPORTING GOODS & TROPHIES
ALEX DAVIS
SHEREE DEAL
CAROLYN & JOHN DEAN
ANDRES DELGADO
DELTA SUPPLY CO
DEMCO INC
DEPENDABLE DODGE INC
DI ROCCO CONSTRUCTION
DICKERSON FLORIDA INC
DIGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS INC
DIVERSIFIhD MEDICAL RECORDS SER
REGGIE DOE
AMY DOK
ELIZABETH DAWN DOLAN
DUVAL FORD GOVT SALES
CURTIS W DYER
EGP INC
ELPEX INC
SUSIE ERHARDT
MELVIN EVERETT
EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC
EXPEDITER, THE
18
AMOUNT
90.37
85.81
599.00
1,379.00
33.48
124.94
51.56
5.22
424.58
280.00
39.56
524.52
25.97
33.38
45.00
399.00
312.00
47.87
1,302.75
53.61
62.50
62.56
652.51
88.89
53330
57.00
47.63
1,782.00
946.00
103.46
5026
5,777.04
80.39
369.88
80.00
8,850.00
217.35
75.23
51.68
380.00
33.02
458.92
28.29
3,871.55
325.89
94.07
339.47
520.65
26.62
22.85
12.65
56.81
28,063.00
27.68
516.00
545.65
1,96537
60.00
897.44
138.90
1
•
VENDOR NBR
1762
215
1811
1793
478
1903
1563
848
2015
1791
1792
1817
1862
475
1614
245
1925
1981
1864
681
1921
1767
160
1848
1899
214
1165
246
1905
1860
1853
1855
2030
2035
44
1856
1858
1984
1990
704
1952
1923
1975
257
1989
1937
873
640
1652
1933
1800
1023
967
202
1833
1986
1973
1889
1662
1970
November 5, 2002
CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR
100670 10/24/2002 F&W PUBLICATIONS INC
100671 10/24/2002 FACTS ON FILE
100672 10/24/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS
100673 10/24/2002 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT
100674 10/24/2002 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
100675 10/24/2002 CYNTHIA FITZPATRICK
100676 10/24/2002 FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION
100677 10/24/2002 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES INC
100678 10/24/2002 FLORIDA FIRE CHEFS' ASSOCIATION
100679 10/24/2002 FLORIDA GAME & FISH COMMISSION
100680 10/24/2002 FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
100681 10/24/2002 FLORIDA HUMANITLES COUNCIL
100682 10/24/2002 FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE TRUST
100683 10/24/2002 FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE
100684 10/24/2002 FLORIDA WATER & POLLUTION CONTROL
100685 10/24/2002 FLOW TECHNOLOGY INC
100686 10/24/2002 LAWRENCE & EURELIA FLYNN
100687 10/24/2002 MILLICENT & NATALIE FORRESTER
100688 10/24/2002 STEVE FREDERICK
100689 10/24/2002 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
100690 10/24/2002 CHRISTINA FRENCH
100691 10/24/2002 FRIENDS OF THE IRC LIBRARY
100692 10/24/2002 FT P!ERCE COCA-COLA
100693 10/24/2002 G E CAPITAL MODULAR SPACE
100694 10/24/2002 G H 0 VERO BEACH INC
100695 10/24/2002 THE GALE GROUP
100696 10/24/2002 GALE GROUP, THE
100697 10/24/2002 GAYLORD BROTHERS INC
100698 10/24/2002 PAIGE GEHRKE
100699 10/24/2002 GENEALOGICAL PUBLISHING CO INC
100700 10/24/2002 GENEALOGICAL SOURCES
100701 10/24/2002 GENERATIONS PRESS
100702 10/24/2002 TERESA GILBERT
100703 10/24/2002 CAROLINE GINN
100704 10/24/2002 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT INC
100705 10/24/2002 GORDON'S ART REFERENCE
100706 10/24/2002 GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SERVICES
100707 10/24/2002 WILLIAM J GRAFF
100708 10/24/2002 STATON GRANT
100709 10/24/2002 GRAPHD{ PRINTING
100710 10/24/2002 GULF COAST FAIR CARE INC
100711 10/24/2002 MARTIN GUTIERREZ
100712 10/24/2002 J M GWINNER
100713 10/24/2002 HACH CO
100714 10/24/2002 MICHAEL & STEPHANIE HALK
100715 10/24/2002 MELISSA HANSEN
100716 10/24/2002 HARBOR BRANCH ENVIRONMENTAL LAB INC
100717 10/24/2002 HARRIS SANITATION INC
100718 10/24/2002 CARLITA HARVEY
100719 10/24/2002 JACK & BETSY HAWKINS
100720 10/24/2002 HAWORTH PRESS INC
100721 10/24/2002 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT
100722 10/24/2002 HERITAGE MICROFILM INC
100723 10/24/2002 HERITAGE BOOKS INC
100724 10/24/2002 JOEL V HERMAN
100725 10/24/2002 WALTER HERNANDEZ
100726 10/24/2002 ILENA HILLS
100727 10/24/2002 RANDY EWES
100728 10/24/2002 HOLIDAY EMBERS
100729 10/24/2002 GARY L HOLLAND
19
AMOUNT
752.80
240.75
69.63
25.00
857.88
42.46
55.50
200.00
75.00
25.00
25.00
400.00
1,170.00
93.00
40.00
180.85
30.94
20.96
64.88
138.75
56.10
39.90
216.50
5,964.00
170.28
88,518.12
1,058.91
1,175.76
50.91
92.65
130.00
54.45
105.00
47.28
389.78
191.50
319.00
24.83
36.50
287.00
56.59
6.16
32.54
196.96
2.87
19.64
70.00
63.58
25.72
12.47
29.95
50.00
5,366.00
911.00
548.30
26.92
28.36
14.55
261.61
15.88
•
VENDOR NBR CHECK
1102 10073
557 10073
10073
10073
10073
10073
10073
10073
10073
10073
10074
10074
10074
10074
100744
100745
100746
100747
100748
100749
100750
100751
100752
100753
100754
100755
100756
100757
100758
100759
100760
100761
100762
100763
100764
100765
100766
100767
100768
100769
100770
100771
100772
100773
100774 1
100775 1
100776 1
100777 1
100778 1
100779 1
100780 1
100781 1
100782 1
100783 1
100784 1
100785 1
100786 10
100787 10
100788 10
100789 10
NB
CK DATE VENDOR
0 10242002 HOME DEPOT
1 10/24/2002 HOMELAND IRRIGATION
672 2 10/24/2002 .HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER INC PA
1852 3 10/24/2002 HOMETOWN VALUES MAGAZINE
1884 4 10242002 JO ANNE HOPKINS
1953 5 10242002 CHARLES HOWSE
1943 6 10242002 RICHARD HUBANS A
1217 7 10242002 LATOSHIA HUBERT
236 8 10242002 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLY
1850 9 10242002 I B M CORPORATION
71 0 10242002 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
1901 1 10242002 JEAN M IMPELLI'1TER
139 2 10242002 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY
112 3 10242002 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
2036 10242002 INDIAN RIVER TITLE COMPANY
1857 10242002 INFO USA MARKETING INC
1851 10242002 INFORMATION TODAY INC
1965 10242002 INNOVATIVE PLACEMENTS INC
1247 10242002 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
2003 10242002 JEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
1949 10242002 JOHN JACKSON HOMES INC
1878 10242002 CATHERINE JOHNSTON
1261 10242002 CYRIL JONES
1215 10242002 ELVIN JONES
2004 10242002 FRED JONES
1861 10242002 MARTHA JONES
1865 10242002 ELIZABETH JORDAN
1936 10/24/2002 LINDA JUBITO
966 10242002 JUNIOR LIBRARY GUILD
1996 10/24/2002 K MART PHARMACY #7294
1992 10242002 TVA L B KENNEDY
1961 10242002 MI H KIM
77 10/24/2002 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES
1997 10242002 K RBY VETERINARY HOSPITAL
1205 10242002 CYRIL KNOWLES
1214 10242002 KUESTERSTEFFEN M.IICE
50 10242002 L B SMITH INC
1979 10242002 R J LAND
1893 10/24/2002 JANE LASHUA M
2029 10242002 DONNY LAWLESS
1854 10242002 LE COMITE DES ARCHIVES
2031 10242002 YVONNE C LENZ
611 10242002 LESCO INC
206 10/242002 THE LIBRARY CORP
1196 0242002 LINDA LICARI
2032 0242002 MIKE LINDSEY
1932 0242002 ROSELENE V LOHMANN
1969 0242002 MELVIN LOUDERMIr K
687 0242002 LOWES CO INC
1885 0242002 KATHLEEN LUGLI
2001 0242002 JUVENAL LUNA
1887 0242002 M G B CONSTRUCTION
258 0242002 MACMILLAN OIL CO
1888 0242002 MARGENE INVESTMENT GROUP INC
1941 0242002 MARGOLIS LENA DIANE
68 0242002 MARTINS LAMAR UNIFORMS
1928 242002 TIM MASLIN
1954 242002 CHARLES J MAX III
1956 242002 MBNA AMERICA
1982 24/2002 LLOYD MCCARTHY
November 5, 2002
20
AMOUNT
634.19
108.26
28.00
390.00
31.59
37.47
43.35
236.25
394.18
703.19
440.15
28.38
364.65
245.88
10,000.00
9,930.00
23155
33.47
41.72
55.00
52.19
69.80
307.36
95.28
15.44
7.42
160.42
10.80
2,206.40
264.86
42.17
18.80
275.00
35.00
1,039.84
97.50
235.13
62.52
81.25
45.00
32.50
75.00
845.20
8,219.00
476.80
180.00
43.95
24.39
313.82
61.85
120.75
70.76
572.26
29.87
32.42
177.64
21.29
52.55
61.56
9.46
•
VENDOR NBR CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR
1579 100790 10/24/2002 MATT MELCHIORI
1802 100791 10/24/2002 MIAMI HAROLD
636 100792 10/24/2002 MIDWEST TAPE
1198 100793 10/24/2002 JOSEPH MILLER
1909 100794 10/24/2002 CAREN MILLS
1801 100795 10/24/2002 MILNER INC
2033 100796 10/24/2002 JACK MONACO
1216 100797 10/24/2002 RUTHIE MOODY
2034 100798 10/24/2002 TERRY MOODY
1972 100799 10/24/2002 TUNISHA MOODY
1964 100800 10/24/2002 VIC MOREIRA
1907 100801 10/24/2002 LANE MORRISON
2007 100802 10/24/2002 MUNIS INC
1999 100803 10/24/2002 DEBBIE MURPHY
1080 100804 10/24/2002 NACO/SOUTHEAST
2000 100805 10/24/2002 DEREK NANCE
1998 100806 10/24/2002 NATIONAL FIRE CODES SUBSCRIPTION
231 100807 10/24/2002 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
783 100808 10/24/2002 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS
1962 100809 10/24/2002 MARK W NIERMEYER
1967 100810 10/24/2002 KATHERINE NOLAN
80 100811 10/24/2002 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY
643. 100812 10/24/2002 NORTHERN SAFETY CO
828 100813 10/24/2002 NORTRAX EQUIPMENT CO
2006 100814 10/24/2002 NRD PROPERTY
1974 100815 10/24/2002 VINCENT OBRIEN
683 100816 10/24/2002 OFFICE DEPOT INC
820 100817 10/24/2002 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICES INC
1912 100818 10/24/2002 NANCY OHERIER
331 100819 10/24/2002 OMNIGRAPHICS INC
1581 100820 10/24/2002 ON ITS WAY
1938 100821 10/24/2002 GEORGE ONEY
1926 100822 10/24/2002 DELMONT OQUIST
1881 100823 10/24/2002 CALONDRA PACE I
1208 100824 10/24/2002 LIVINGSTON PAGE
405 100825 10/24/2002 PALM BEACH LINCOLN MERCURY
1994 100826 10/24/2002 PATRICIA PALMER
51 100827 10/24/2002 PAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING CO
1835 100828 10/24/2002 PATRICIA PANKIE WICZ_FUCHS
1713 100829 10/24/2002 PARK PLACE MHC
30 100830 10/24/2002 PARK'S RENTAL & SALES INC
1920 100831 10/24/2002 WILLIAM H PARKIN
1017 100832 10/24/2002 PARKS AND SONS INC
1691 100833 10/24/2002 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
81 100834 10/24/2002 PAVCO CONSTRUCTION INC
1883 100835 10/24/2002 KEITH PELAN
1187 100836 10/24/2002 DAVID PHIPPS
343 100837 10/24/2002 PICTON PRESS
1914 100838 10/24/2002 POWELL MARY
1939 100839 10/24/2002 PRETE JOHN & ANNETTE
1798 100840 10/24/2002 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS PUBL CO INC
1807 100841 10/24/2002 PROFESSIONAL TITLE
1807 100842 10/24/2002 PROFESSIONAL TITLE
1807 100843 10/24/2002 PROFESSIONAL TITLE
1397 100844 10/24/2002 PUBLIX PHARMACY
221 100845 10/24/2002 QUALITY BOOKS INC
1915 100846 10/24/2002 QUARANTO DANNY & JOSEFINA
1985 100847 10/24/2002 MICHAEL QUESNEL
1836 100848 10/24/2002 RADISSON RESORT PARKWAY
653 100849 10/24/2002 RECORDED BOOKS
November 5, 2002
21
AMOUNT
128.75
78.00
891.47
454.52
41.15
960.00
195.00
252.00
92.50
6.39
37.10
27.98
3,232.50
119.00
1,775.00
146.78
700.00
23.70
3,361.92
60.26
16.40
14.27
173.69
487.76
486.00
30.00
1,261.72
2,020.66
11.21
340.88
567.60
10.64
28.62
26.19
149.50
191.13
48.50
255.00
143.72
95.05
18.00
43.74
2,375.00
71.37
106.92
75.13
443.92
1,099.45
461.47
4.51
78.75
13.70
36.25
521.11
50.00
178.84
50.14
22.01
534.00
186.00
DU ,
til‘ 1
•
VENDOR NBR CHECK NBR
1980 100850
1100 100851
1879
1837
1891
1194
1898
238
1895
1199
1838
1906
1988
1963
113
1799
1145
1882
1224
346
1948
1971
1839
1913
1803
1987
1125
1226
1840
1227
1227
1976
1250
1560
35
89
45
1806
1993
1246
1896
1234
1649
1922
1592
1877
1995
174
1983
641
86
1564
1564
391
1583
1890
1978
1028
589
429
November 5, 2002
100852
100853
100854
100855
100856
100857
100858
100859
100860
100861
100862
100863
100864
100865
100866
100867
100868
100869
100870
100871
100872
100873
100874
100875
100876
100877
100878
100879
100880
100881
100882
100883
100884
100885
100886
100887
100888
100889
100890
100891
100892
100893
100894
100895
100896
100897
100898
100899
100900
100901
100902
100903
100904
100905
100906
100907
100908
100909
CK DATE
10/24/200
10/24/200
10/24!200
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
VENDOR
2 REITANO ENTERPRISES INC
2 REXEL SOUTHERN
2 REXFORD BUILDERS
RIA
TONI RICH L
RICHARD RIDGE
MOTISOLA ROBERTS
ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET INC
DALE ROGERS
THOMAS ROYAL
SAN ANTONIO GENEALOGICAL
ANNE SCHILLACE
LEE ANN SHRADER
DOROTHY SCOTT
SEWELL HARDWARE
SEXTON INC
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF
RICHARD SIRANY
JOHN SMALLWOOD
SMITH BROS CONTRACTING EQUIP
SHEILA SMITH
ANNE EVELINE SMITH
PATRICIA D SMITH
SNYDER EDWARD
SOURCEBOOKS NC
LANCE SOUTH
SOUTHEAST STAFFING INC
JABO SPATES III
STANDARD & POOR'S
LARRY STEPHENS
LARRY STEPHENS
GAIL STEWARD
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ROCCO STROLLO
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD
SUN TELEPHONE INC
SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
SUSPENDED AQUATIC MENTOR INC
PETER SUTHERLAND
RONALD L TESNOW
LAURA TRIMMER
DAVID T THOMAS
JOHN W TIPPIN
SHARON TOMLIN
TOTAL TRUCK PARTS
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
GERTRUDE TRUEAX
TURF MASTER TRACTOR & MOWER
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY SERVICE
VAKIL DIPTI TUSHER
FREDRICK VAN ANTWERP
CITY OF VERO BEACH
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
VERO FURNITURE MART
22
AMOUNT
300.00
66.21
36.31
975.04
40.33
1,188.00
72.24
68.56
30.94
641.26
58.00
42.06
9.41
41.96
60.86
3,200.00
150.00
30.05
175.50
87.22
64.70
58.36
32.00
18.36
142.70
34.34
4,842.69
95.28
4,648.64
162.50
91.00
28.71
8,305.78
763.26
7.38
70.00
88.60
690.00
43.01
552.50
-14.12
175.50
25.00
36.56
481.35
50.73
250.00
79.86
74.03
233.65
960.00
1,030.00
250.00
10,506.41
310.58
56.14
21.13
50.00
92.83
192.00
1
•
VENDOR NBR CHECK NBR
201 100910
1243
1244
1897
1919
1841
1809
1927
1831
1958
1950
1935
1886
1876
75
113
140
201
242
391
428
585
713
780
786
796
833
977
1088
1143
1183
1220
1235
1397
1562
1942
1957
1966
2008
2009
Grand Total:
CHECK
NUMBER
0329967
0330563
O 330617
0330377
0330914
O 330932
0330936
O 331391
O 332068
0332069
0332070
0332071
0332072
0332073
November 5, 2002
100911
100912
100913
100914
100915
100916
100917
100918
100919
100920
100921
100922
100923
100924
100925
100926
100927
100928
100929
100930
100931
100932
100933
100934
100935
100936
100937
100938
100939
100940
100941
100942
100943
100944
100945
100946
100947
100948
100949
NAME
CK DATE
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
10/24/2002
VENDOR
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER
MICHAEL WAGNER
KEITH WALKER
TIMOTHY WEBB
WELLINGTON HOMES
WELLS, VIKKI L
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTER
FAYE AND THOMAS WIGGINS
WILLIAM MCINTOSH CHAPTER NSDAR
BARBARA WILLIAMS
MARY WILSON
KATHERINE ZELL
MARYELLEN ZELNO
PAUL ZELNO
SCOTTS SPORTING GOODS
SEWELL HARDWARE
GRAINGER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER
SUNRISE TRACTOR
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION
VERO BEARING & BOLT
PETERSEN INDUSTRIES INC
STAGE AND SCREEN
REXEL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ROCHA CONTROLS
SUN BELT MEDICAL
SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
PAMELA G PHELPS
SEARS INDUSTRIAL SALES
PETTY CASH -]ILL KREBBS
REEBOK FACTORY OUTLET
RUTH SHELTON
KAREN VEIT
PUBLIX PHARMACY
SUSAN B WILSON
RERAN, V S
VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART
VERO BLUEPRINT AND SUPPLY
SERVPRO
PULCIR INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CODE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BAR ASSOC
MONTO, TERRY AND ROBERT
CHIARANTONA, RICHARD
LARSON, LISBETH B
CAVALIERI, MARIA A
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
A T & T
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
APOLLO ENTERPRISES
ADVANCED A/C & HEATING
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
AKINS, JAMES
23
CHECK
DATE
2002-09-05
2002-09-19
2002-09-19
2002-09-19
2002-09-19
2002-09-19
2002-09-19
2002-10-03
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
•
AMOUNT
576.39
45.50
150.00
32.59
22.60
364.50
19,521.30
44.64
42.45
51.50
62.64
59.16
46.66
8.49
784.83
3.77
148.46
151.24
4130
2,115.71
177.69
71.05
42.66
1,762.00
1,800.00
20.00
341.10
350.00
10.25
8.53
239.85
40.00
1,066.92
297.90
358.50
625.00
7,543.25
211.20
75.00
23,560.00
531,496.91
CHECK
AMOUNT
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
17.87
35,699.01
242.28
2,680.00
300.00
158.64
4 -
Void
Void
Void
Void
Void
Void
Void
Void
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0332074 AMERICAS HEALTH
0332075 AFLAC
0332076 ALFORD, HUBERT
0332077 BOYNTON PUMP &
O 332078 BELLSOUTH
0332079 BASS-CARLTON SOD INC
O 332080 BREVARD ORTHHOPAEDIC CLINIC
0332081 BARKER, MANNIE
0332082 BASS, HOWARD
O 332083 BLUE SHIELD FL FEDERAL HC
0332084 BOWERS, PAULINE A
0332085 BYRNES, THOMAS
0332086 BLUE SHIELD FL MEDICARE SUPP
0332087 CAMERON & BARKLEY CO
0332088 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
0332089 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
0332090 CLIFF BERRY,INC
0332091 CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
O 332092 CENTRAL FLORIDA SPORTS
0332093 COGBURN, RICHARD L
0332094 CRAFT, MILDRED
O 332095 CHARTONE INC
0332096 COASTAL BIO -SYSTEMS
O 332097 DELTA SUPPLY CO
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
DICKERSON-FLORIDA,
DAY, MIRIAM
DLOUGHY, ELINOR
DODD, MARTHA
E G P, INC
ELPEX, INC
EWING, MARSHA
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS,
EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL
FELICIANO, FRANK
FISCALETTI, LUCY
FEDEX
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FRENCH, GEORGE
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE
GEISLER-STEINER, MARCIA J
GAGEL., SALOI
G H I
GANSER, OLIVE B
G B F INFOSYSTEMS
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES
HOLMES, IDA
HURST, BETTY
HOGELAND, ALBERT
HEPBURN, WALKER
HARP, TROY
IRRIGATION
O 332098
O 332099
0332100
0332101
0332102
0332103
0332104
0332105
0332106
0332107
0332108
0332109
0332110
O 332111
0332112
0332113
0332114
0332115
O 332116
0332117
O 332118
0332119
0332120
0332121
O 332122
O 332123
O 332124
0332125
O 332126
O 332127
0332128
O 332129
O 332130
O 332131
O 332132
November 5, 2002
OF
INC
INC
LAW
COMPANY
BUSINESS
24
CHECK
DATE
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-1C-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
CHECK
AMOUNT
277.73
56.18
50.00
19.53
365.14
683.00
116.45
20.72
53.80
80.90
58.85
30.00
47.07
180.83
92,433.60
43.00
100.00
3,382.65
1,210.00
347.50
53.53
10.83
209.00
21.99
2,440.37
19,232.00
58.38
60.00
56.47
43.75
325.15
2.00
3,000.00
1,994.18
350.00
57.65
52.11
76.01
30.00
46,131.13
5,324.54
40.00
81,020.26
339.00
339.97
31.50
40.00
29.09
54.40
12,600.37
465.50
64,769.75
2,788.50
30,000.00
2,426.88
67.50
55.58
53.20
71.00
•
c
• •
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0332133 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
0332134 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
0332135 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
0332136 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
0332137 INDIAN RIVER ANIMAL HOSPITAL
0332138 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE
0332139 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
0332140 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
0332141 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
0332142 I D T AMERICA
0332143 INDEPENDENT HEALTH
0332144 JANNACH PROPERTIES LTD
0332145 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
0332146 KEMIRON INC
0332147 KOLLAR, HAROLD
0332148 KIRBY, ROBERETA
0332149 KARGE, LUCILLE
0332150 KAUFMAN, ALAN
0332151 LESCO, INC
0332152 LARSON, SANDRA K
0332153 LAUDERMILK, ETHELDA
0332154 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
0332155 LANDRUM, GREGORY C PSY D
0332156 LIVE OAK ANIMAL HOSPITAL
0332157 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
0332158 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
0332159 LONDON GRAPHICS
0332160 MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC, INC
0332161 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDER
0332162 M C B COLLECTION SERVICES INC
0332163 MUNIS INC
0332164 MARRAN, WILLIAM
0332165 MARTINEZ, WILLIAM
0332166 NATIONAL STATES INSURANCE
0332167 NAUDAIN, RUTH
0332168 NEWPECK, IRENE
0332169 ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO
0332170 ONEAL, PEGGY
0332171 PETTY CASH
0332172 P B S & J
0332173 PORT CONSOLIDATED
0332174 PINEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
0332175 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
0332176 PEREZ, VICTOR
0332177 PERKINS PHARMACY
0332178 PAPP, ANDREW
O 332179 PHILLIPS, TAMMY L
O 332180 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
O 332181 RICHARDSON, DEETTE
O 332182 RATHBURN, ELLEN
0332183 SCHOPP, BARBARA G
0332184 STATE OF FLORIDA
0332185 SEMBLER, CHARLES W
O 332186 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
0332187 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
0332188 SEVILLE CORP
November 5, 2002
25 A
CHECK
DATE
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
CHECK
AMOUNT
180.00
23,527.73
3,882.71
482.92
15.00
1,503.83
1,127.50
35,953.89
35.00
81.55
163.81
3,900.00
1,228.44
2,143.46
51.54
56.47
55.58
30.00
106.00
53.20
15.00
19.97
600.00
10.00
392.05
285.48
630.85
2,500.00
23.74
15.47
8,415.00
89.89
55.58
44.70
55.28
53.80
4,545.00
52.02
30.35
1,000.00
979.98
15.00
96.10
25.00
183.58
20.16
15.00
36.30
52.50
53.20
115.50
5,620.35
11,978.66
175.58
537.20
1,070.16
lam a
CHECK
NUMBER
0332189
0332190
0332191
0332192
0332193
0332194
0332195
0332196
0332197
0332198
0332199
0332200
0332201
0332202
0332203
0332204
0332205
0332206
0332207
0332208
0332209
0332210
0332211
0332212
0332213
0332214
0332215
0332216
0332217
0332218
0332219
0332220
0332221
0332222
0332223
0332224
NAME
SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL
SEA OAKS INVESTMENT, LTD
SUNCOAST COUNSELING &
STERICYCLE INC
SMITH & COMPANY, INC
ST PETER'S HUMAN SERVICES, INC
STATE FARM AUTO
STODDARD, JOSEPH
STEFFENSEN, ANNA
SMITH, RICHARD H
SMITH, NANCY
SMITH, CECILIA
SLUMS, WILLIAM
SERAPHINE, VIOLA
SELDES, CAROL
SCHLITT, JOHN
TEXACO/SHELL
TREASURE COAST ORTHOPAEDICS
TRICARE REGION E
TESTAMERICA INC
TELEMETRIC SYSTEMS INC
THOMAS, BRIDGETT
THOMPSON, JAYNE
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
UNITED HEALTH CARE
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
VOGT, BETTY
VASS, VERA
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
WALGREEN COMPANY
WAL-MART STORES INC
WILDE, LAWRENCE L
FAILLA, CHRIS AND CAAREN
CHECK
DATE
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
2002-10-24
CHECK
AMOUNT
767.87
10,027.20
500.00
636.75
643,450.09
3,067.03
357.50
196.25
7.50
68.50
54.54
27.62
53.87
53.20
30.28
53.80
4,828.00
39.00
166.42
11,261.00
227.00
101.25
57.67
952.50
745.17
74.45
79.95
4,624.72
29.30
53.80
53.80
1,942.00
1,997.49
238.34
55.58
27.42
1,214,670.28
7. F. Clerk of Court - Investment Advisory Committee's Quarterly
Report - July - September 2002
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 2002:
November 5, 2002
25 B
5
•
TO: THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: OCTOBER 29, 2002
SUBJECT: INVESTMENT REPORT
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
BACKGROUND
The Investment Advisory Committee met to review the investment activities conducted by the
Clerk's Finance Department for the quarter starting July 1, 2002 and ending September 30, 2002.
Attached to this memorandum is the Investment Committee Report for the investment activities of
the Clerk's Finance Department for July 1, 2002 through September 30, 2002 Additional
information concerning the composition of the investment portfolio and investment earnings is
included as part of the report.
RECOM'v1EN DATION
Accept the Investment Advisory Committee Quarterly Report.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted the
Investment Advisory Committee's Quarterly Report as
presented.
7. G. Sheriff's Office - Federal Annual Certification Report Approval
The Board reviewed a letter of October 24, 2002:
ijcrtft
ROY RAYMOND + INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
4055 41st AVENUE
October 24, 2002
November 5, 2002
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-670C
26
;u
•
The Honorable Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
Re: Federal Annual Certification Report
Dear Chairman Stanbridge:
The attached Federal Annual Certification Report needs to be executed by the Chairman of the
Board of County Commissioners.
If you would return the original to me, I will forward it to the proper agency.
Sincerely,
Roy Raymond, Sheriff
RR:mej
Attachment
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, incorporated
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
Federal Annual Certification Report and authorized the
Chairman's signature upon same, as requested.
COPY OF REPORT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.H. Sheriff's Office - Constitutional Officers Financial Report for
FY Ending 09/30/02
The Board reviewed a letter of October 25, 2002:
November 5, 2002
efjertff
ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NAT ONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
4055 41st AVENUE
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (772) 569-6700
October 25, 2002
The Honorable Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
Dear Chairman Stanbridge:
Attached is check number 49435 in the amount of $639,282.09, which represents funds due to
the Board of County Commissioners as detailed below:
Fund 016, General Fund Reversion $ 426,870.16
(includes $78,000 FRS savings)
Federal Prisoner Revenue 209,220.00
I.N.S. Prisoner Revenue 180.00
Interest Income 3.011.93
Total $ 639,282.09
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Harry Hall at
978-6406.
Sincerely,
Roy Raymond, Shen
Harry E. Hall, Comptroller
cc: Jason E. Brown, Budget Manager
Ed Fry, Finance Director
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency ` _
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporated .3�,,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted the
Sheriffs financial report and acknowledged receipt of his check
in the amount of $639,282.09.
November 5, 2002
7.1. Clerk of Court's Donation of Surplus Computer Equipment to
Gifford Youth Activity Center
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 22, 2002 and list:
To:
From.
Date:
Subject:
Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Jeffrey K Barton, Clerk of the Circuit Court
October 22, 2002
Donation of Surplus Computer Equipment
The Clerk of the Circuit Court, over the past few years, has replaced numerous PCs. Several attempts
have been made to find other departments or offices that would be able to use the PCs_. After
exploring various alternatives, I felt that the best use of the PCs would be for the Gifford Youth
Activity Center. Accordingly, I donated the PCs to the Gifford Youth Activity Center. I am
requesting after the fact approval from the Board of County Commissioners for this donation.
Attached is the list of the PCs that were donated.
PCs DONATED TO THE GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER
15789 486 Computer
16024 Compaq 586 DT Prolinea Computer
16025 Compaq 586 DT Prolinea Computer
16026 Compaq 586 DT Prolines Computer
16027 Compaq 586 DT Prohnea Computer
16292 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
16319 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
16422 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
16459 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
16575 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
16608 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18115 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18156 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18157 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18158 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18159 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18160 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18161 Compaq Deskpro 2000 Computer
18210 Compaq Deskpro 4000 Computer
18211 Compaq Deskpro 4000 Computer
November 5, 2002
29
18212
18213
18321
18354
18355
18356
18357
18359
18360
18361
18362
18460
18461
18462
`8464
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Compaq
Deskpro 4000 Computer
Deskpro 4000 Computer
WS5000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 2000 Computer
Deskpro 6000 Computer
Deskpro 6000 Computer
Deskpro 6000 Computer
Deskpro 6000 Computer
nv
Di\
• •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved donation
of computer equipment as listed to the Gifford Youth Activity
Center after -the -fact, as requested.
7.J. City of Sebastian - Councilman Ray Coniglio Appointed to
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) as their Second Member
- Joe Barczyk Appointed as Alternate
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 2002:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Vickie Phillips, Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
DATE• October 28, 2002
SUBJECT: MPO Appointment
This is to notify the Board that at the October 23, 2002 meeting of the
Sebastian City Council, the Council appointed Councilman Ray Coniglio as
the second member, and Joe Barczyk as the alternate to the MPO.
This appointment was the result of the amended by-laws approved by the
MPO on October 9, 2002 adding a new member from the City of Sebastian
to the MPO.
No Board action is required.
NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED
November 5, 2002
30
Cr
i
7.K. 2003 Holiday Schedule
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 2002:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
James Carnicell. 4. L
Human Resourc 4, rector
October 24, 2002
2003 Holiday Schedule
For consideration by the Board of County Commissioners: proposed schedule of holidays for Indian
River County employees for 2003.
Holiday
County Observance
New Year's Day
Good Friday
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Day after Thanksgiving
Christmas Eve
Christmas Day
Wednesday, January 1, 2003
Friday, April 18, 2003
Monday, May 26, 2003
Friday, July 4, 2003
Monday, September 1, 2003
Tuesday, November 11, 2003
Thursday, November 27, 2003
Friday, November 28, 2003
Wednesday, December 24, 2003
Thursday, December 25, 2003
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the 2003
Holiday Schedule as presented.
November 5, 2002
•
7.L. Temporary Water Service Agreements - Ted J. Kwarchak, Jr.
and Mary Sue Kwarchak, Michael P. and Lynn A. McKnight - San
Sebastian Springs Unit IV
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of September 13, 2002:
DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 2002
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: W. ERIK OLSON oW � V'
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
AA
PREPARED AND JAMES D. CHAST "
AND MANAGER OF SE "1 NT PROJECTS
STAFFED BY: DEPART ILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT:
TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS
LNDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND TED J. KWARCHAK, JR, AND
MARY SUE KWARCHAK, MICHAEL P. AND LYNN A MCKNIGHT
IN SAN SEBASTIAN SPRINGS SNIT IV
BACKGROUND
The Department has been requested by several area residents of San Sebastian Springs to
extend water service to their new homes. Three property owners have previously signed
temporary water service agreements and service has been provided to lots 12, 121 and 123, from
the water main on Gardenia Street. Ted J. Kwarchak Jr & Mary Sue Kwarchak, 13 West End
Lane (Lot 148), and Michael P. & Lynn A. Mcknight, 11 West End Lane (Lot 149), have
requested that water service be provided to their home, from the water main on CR 512, prior to
the installation of a water main on West End Lane.
ANALYSIS
The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall
provide temporary water service to Ted J. Kwarchak, Jr. and Mary Sue Kwarchak and Michael
P & Lynn A. Mcknight, until such time that a water line may be constructed on West End Lane
by assessment Payment of all fees required to make this connection and participation in the
assessment which may involve reconnecting to this water line as required by the Indian River
County Department of Utility Services has been agreed to by Ted J. Kwarchak Jr and Mary Sue
Kwarchak, and Michael P. and Lynn A. Mcknight.
The above owners of lots 148 & 149, have provided easements which will allow service to
their homes and provide an access entry for installing county water to their homes, and in the
future the remainder of the subdivision.
November 5, 2002
32
r ,'
DA 1
•
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached Agreements with Ted J. Kwarchak Jr and Mary Sue
Kwarchak and Michael P. and Lynn A. Mcicnight, on the Consent Agenda
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
Temporary Water Service Agreement's and Tax Map
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
agreements with Ted J. Kwarchak, Jr. and Mary Sue Kwarchak
and Michael P. and Lynn A. McKnight, as recommended in the
memorandum.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.M. The Palms of Vero Beach, L.P. - Bryant, Miller and Olive (Bond
Counsel) Authorized to File Bond Validation Proceeding in Leon
County on Behalf of Indian River County and Florida Housing
Finance Corporation
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 2002:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of County Commissioners
Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator'%
October 30, 2002
Authorized Bond Counsel to File Bond Validation for Palms
of % ero Beach, L.P. S1,500,000 Bond Issue
November 5, 2002
33
Description
Indian River County approved a bond volume allocation of S1,500,000 for the Palms of Vero
Beach, L P This allocation expires if the bonds are not issued by November 8 2002 and there is
a high likelihood that the bonds will not be issued by this date The only method to extend this
allocation after November 8, 2002 is to authorize the County's bond counsel Bryant, Miller and
Olive, P.A. to file on behalf of the County and Florida Housing, a Bond Validation proceeding in
Leon County.
Funding
Cost will be paid by Palms of Vero Beach, L.P.
Recommendation
Authorize Bryant, Miller and Olive to proceed in preparing and filing the bond validation in
Leon County, Florida on behalf of the County and Florida Housing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized Bryant,
Miller and Olive to proceed in preparing and filing the bond
validation in Leon County, Florida, on behalf of Indian River
County and Florida Housing Finance Corporation concerning
The Palms of Vero Beach, L P , as recommended in the
memorandum.
7.N. Resolution No. 2002-093 - Establishing the Indian River County
Extension Services Ad Hoc Committee and Appointing Members
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 2002:
October 24, 2002
To:
From.
Re:
Board of County Commissioners
Paul G. Bangel, County Att Bey
Indian River County Extension Services Ad Hoc Committee
November 5, 2002
34
CA
•
•
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed
resolution establishing the Indian River County Extension Services Ad Hoc Committee.
Discussion:
On October22, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners created the Indian River
County Extension Services Ad Hoc Committee. A proposed resolution has been prepared
consistent with Section 103.04, The Code of Indian River County, regarding creation of
advisory boards.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution
No. 2002-093 establishing the Indian River County Extension
Services Ad Hoc Committee.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 093
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICES AD HOC
COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, Indian River County is now at a critical stage in developing
educational outreach as it relates to the Clean Water Act and the County's stormwater
initiatives; and
WHEREAS, an important step in this education is involvement of the Office of
the Indian River County Extension Service. and
WHEREAS, the creation of an ad hoc advisory committee to assist the Board of
County Commissioners concerning the programs of the Extension Service, future
direction, and the issue of a water quality position would be beneficial; and
WHEREAS, Section 103.04 of The Code of Indian River County provides that all
advisory boards or commissions be created by resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida as follows:
1. Establishment. The Indian River County Extension Services Ad Hoc Committee
is hereby established.
2. Membership. The Indian River County Extension Services Ad Hoc Committee
shall have four voting members, who shall select a Chairman and a Vice
Chairman as provided in Chapter 103, The Code of Indian River County. The
November 5, 2002
35
•
following individuals are appointed as members of the Indian River County
Extension Services Ad Hoc Committee:
Hildie Tripson
Mike Ziegler
Holly Dill
Alexander Kromhout
3. Term of Office. The term of office shall be 60 days or until the committee is
dissolved by the Board of County Commissioners. Members shall serve at the
pleasure of the Board of County Commissioners.
4. Powers and Duties. The Indian River County Extension Services Ad Hoc
Committee shall have the power and duty to:
a) Consider and study the extension programs, their future direction, and the
issue of a water quality position; and
b) Consider matters assigned by the Board of County Commissioners; and
c) Submit to the Board of County Commissioners within 60 days from the
establishment of the Committee recommendations regarding water quality
programs and the issue of a water quality agent position.
5. Advisory Status. The Committee shall be advisory only and the members shall
serve without compensation.
6. General Provisions. The applicable provisions of Part I, Chapter 103, The
Code of Indian River County, relating to advisory boards and commissions, shall
apply to this committee.
The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner Adams
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n , and, upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn 'ye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted nunc
pro tunc effective October 22, 2002, this 5th day of November , 2002.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
et
-
By` _Y
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
•
Deputy Clerk Ruth M. Stanbridge,0irman
y
November 5, 2002
36
•
7.0. Employment Agreement with Assistant County Attorney Marian
E. Fell
(CLERK'S NOTE This item separated from Consent Agenda for discussion.)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 2002:
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: October 30, 2002
Subject: Contract for Assistant County Attorney
From. Ruth M. Stanbridge
Chairman
Attached is the contract I have negotiated with the Assistant County Attorney, Marian E.
Fell.
County Attorney, Paul Bangel, conducted a salary survey of similar positions in the same
size counties and determined that the increase is very much in line I reviewed the
diversity and complexity of the projects completed, in progress, and under review, and feel
we are fortunate to have a person with her years of experience in this position. Without
this expertise, many of these projects would have needed to be outsourced and could have
been very expensive.
Recommend placing this contracts on the Consent Agenda for the November 5, 2002
commission meeting.
Attachment
County Attorney Bangel asked if anyone objected to moving this item to the end of
the agenda, but Commissioner Adams wanted the matter considered before they moved on
to the rest of the day's agenda.
Commissioner Adams was concerned about the increase being proposed for Ms. Fell
because it seemed to be excessive and was unfair to the rest of the County employees. She
was also concerned because it did not come directly from the County Attorney. It appeared
November 5, 2002
37
k
0
•
that the increase was more than 12% above her contract. She specified that her objection
was not a negative comment on Ms. Fell's job performance but a lot of County employees
do yeoman jobs and their raises are consistent with what has been done overall. She would
not be comfortable with granting such a large increase in salary.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously referred this matter
to Chairman Stanbridge, Administrator Chandler, and County
Attorney Bangel to come back to the Commission.
7.P. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver - Lot 3, Block 23, Vero
Lake Estates, Unit 5A - 7845 90th Avenue - MGB Construction, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 22, 2002:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH:
James W. Davis, P E , Public Works Director
AND
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr , P E , County Engine
FROM: David B. Cox, P E , Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 3, Block 23,
Vero Lake Estates Unit 5A, 7845 90th Avenue
REFERENCE: Project No. 2002090175-32578
CONSENT AGENDA
DATE: October 22, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
MGB Construction, Inc. submitted a building permit application for a single-family residence on the
subject property. The site is located in an AE special flood hazard zone, base flood elevation 22.9 ft.
N G V D In the attached letter from the applicant's engineer dated October 17, 2002, a waiver of
the cut and fill requirements is requested. The lot area is 1.06 acres. The volume of the 100 -year
floodplain displaced by the proposed grading plan is estimated to be 479.8 cubic yards.
November 5, 2002
38
L. V
ht
•
U
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4. of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots located in the
Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Alternative No. 1
Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4.
Alternative No. 2
Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the
proposed floodplain displacement.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from Ronald G. Keller, P.E., dated October 17, 2002.
2. Calculations for cut and fill
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously granted the cut and
fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4, as recommended in the memorandum.
7. _. Bid #5015 - South County Water Plant Sodium Hypochlorite
Building - Bids Rejected - Specifications to be Revised and Project
Rebid
(CLERK'S NOTE• This item separated from the Consent Agenda for discussion.)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 23, 2002:
November 5, 2002
39
DATE:
TO:
THROUGH:
October 23, 2002
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION -ERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Erik Olson, Utilities Department, Director
Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager
Indian River County Bid # 5015 South County Water Plant Sodium
Hypochlorite Building
Utilities Department / Water Treatment Division
BACKGROUND:
The Utilities Department has requested the construction of a 23' x 36' building for the storage of
Sodium Hypochlorite at the South County Water Plant. The bid results are as follows:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specification s requested by:
Replies:
August 28, 2002 at 2.00 pm
August 12 and 19, 2002
Nine Hundred Seventy One (971) vendors
Twenty Two (22) vendors
Two (2) vendor
BID TABULATION:
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $45,000.00
SOURCE OF
SDS: 472-000-169-560.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Both bids received were over the budgeted amount, therefore, staff recommends that these bids
be rejected, the specifications be revised and the project be rebid.
November 5, 2002
Vendor
Amount
1.
AWM Construction
Ft Pierce, FL
$63,500.00
2.
Jim Wright Construction
Vero Beach, FL
$103,695.00
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $45,000.00
SOURCE OF
SDS: 472-000-169-560.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Both bids received were over the budgeted amount, therefore, staff recommends that these bids
be rejected, the specifications be revised and the project be rebid.
November 5, 2002
Commissioner Adams advised that she separated this item from the Consent Agenda
in order to ask Utilities Director Olson to explain why these bids were so much over budget.
Utilities Director Erik Olson explained that when putting the bid together about a year
and a half ago, staff had under -estimated construction costs. The building is still needed but
it needs to be redesigned to be more cost-effective. He recommended the Board reject all
bids and direct staff to redesign the building and rebid the work.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously rejected the bids and
directed that the specifications be revised and the project be
rebid, as recommended in the memorandum.
7.R. Courthouse Chiller Maintenance Contract Renewal - South
Florida Trane Service, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 25, 2002:
Date: October 25, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator ,�
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director �l Ly °gm)•
Subject: Courthouse Chiller Maintenance Contract Renewal
BACKGROUND:
Last November, General Services requested the Board's approval of a chiller maintenance
contract renewal with Trane Air Conditioning through South Florida Trane Service for the
Courthouse chiller. The Board may recall that the air conditioning equipment was manufactured
and supplied by Trane and had originally been under warranty. When the warranty had expired
it was necessary to obtain a maintenance agreement to cover the chillers. If authorized by the
Board, this would be the third year of contracting the service agreement with Trane.
South Florida Trane has offered to extend the maintenance services for an additional year (third
year) at no increase in cost ($11 875).
November 5, 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the additional year's extension (through November
21, 2003) of the maintenance contract with South Florida Trane Service Incorporated, an
American Standard Company for the same costs and conditions with no increases in c osts or
charges.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized a one-
year extension of the maintenance contract with South Florida
Trane Service, Inc., an American Standard Company, at the
same costs and conditions and no increase in costs or charges,
as recommended in the memorandum. Contract will expire
November 21, 2003.
DOCUMENTATION WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS
SUBDIVISION PETITION WATER SERVICE - RESOLUTION III (NOT
ADOPTED)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Assessment Projects Manager James D. "Dan'" Chastain reviewed a Memorandum
of October 25, 2002:
DATE: OCTOBER 25, 2002
TO: JA:'�IES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADNILrTS i'RATORCi
FROM: W. ERIK OLSON
DIRECTOR OF UTILIERVICES
November 5, 2002
PREPARED
AND STAFFED
BY
JAMES D. CHAST
MANAGER OF S • NT PROJECTS
DEPARTMENTSJ ILITY SERVICES
ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION
PE 1'11'ION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UCP -2075
RESOLUTION III- PUBLIC HEARING
BACKGROUND
On October 8, 2002, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved
Resolutions I (2002-089) and Resolution II (2002-090) for the above referenced Ercildoune
Heights Subdivision Petition Water Service Project. Resolution I contained the preliminary
assessment roll describing the project and cost. Resolution II set the date of the public hearing for
the subject project. Property owners have been notified of the public hearing by mail. Resolution
I (2002-089) was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal on October 14, 2002. (See
ATTACHMENTS: 1 -Plat Map, 2 -Schedule of Properties/Summary Assessment 3 -Estimated
Project cost & Preliminary Assessment Roll and 4 -Potable water & Sanitary sewer Sub -elements
On October 22 2002, at 7 pm. an informational meeting was held for the benefit of the property
owners; at the Indian River North County Library. The meeting was attended by 18 property
owners.
The Department of Utility Services staff has completed design of the water distribution system.
ANALYSIS
Originally there were 66 platted residential lots, which were to benefit from this proposed water
main installation. Since November 6, 2001 when the Board of County Commissioners authorized
proceeding with the design, owners on 80th Avenue proceeded with an earlier plan that they had
and have extended the water main on 80th Avenue to 144`" Street. This water main extension will
serve 7 properties and reduces the number of residential properties requiring service and to be
included in the assessment to 59 The original petition together with addendums was supported
with signatures of the owners of 21 properties, representing 32 % of the onginal 66 residential
lots. Of the remaining 59 residential lots to be served, 16 had signed the original petition which
represents 27 %. During design of this primarily residential project staff has determined that a
non -platted 3.69 acre medically zoned parcel and a 7 unit medical condominium, at the southeast
corner of the project, should also be served from the water main installation along 79th Avenue
and 142nd Way and have included these parcels in this proposed assessment.
The majority of the single family lot sizes in this subdivision are 0.27 & 0 28 acre and are
undersized," according to Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan and the County Public
Health Unit, Division of Environmental Health, which require that new lots utilizing well and
septic systems be a minimum of one-half acre. Lots not meeting these minimum standards are
called "undersized lots".
Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan states, "The County's water system shall be
expanded to supply the potable water needs of the eastern half of the County through 2010". (See
ATTACHMENT 4, page 2 of the Potable Water Sub -element, and page 23 of the Sanitary Sewer
Sub -element).
The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment project. (ATTACHMENT 1).
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water
line route. In the interim, funding will be from the Assessment Fund No. 473.
Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The estimated project cost, and
amount to be assessed, including engineering, administration and construction is
ovember 5, 2002
$ 236,891.57. The estimated cost per square foot is $ 0.241948 (rounded). (See
ATTACHMENT- 3 Estimated Project Cost & Preliminary Assessment Roll).
RE CONLNIENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the attached resolution III, which affirms the preliminary assessment roll
on the subject property.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution III together with:
1. Plat Map
2 Schedule of Properties / Summary Assessment
3. Estimated Project Cost & Preliminary Assessment Roll
4. Potable water & sanitary sewer sub -elements
Commissioner Ginn asked if Mr. Chastain had changed his mind as to the need for
this project, and he advised that he had not but had just learned this morning that there were
so many residents who objected because the estimated assessments are so high.
Chairman Stanbridge asked about undersized lots in this subdivision, and Mr.
Chastain responded that usually the Health Department looks into that aspect and added that
many of the owners have said they have had excellent water from their wells; some of the
residents want County water and others do not. This project would also bring water for fire
protection.
Commissioner Macht suggested that, absent a mandate from the Health Department,
if people do not want County water, he thought the Board should not continue to pursue this
prod ect.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Frank Wegel, 8060 142nd Street, spoke in favor of the project. He thought the cost
was the reason so many property owners are now opposed. He read a letter from Diane Beck
November 5, 2002
& David G. Ritter, 8046 141st Street, indicating they were in favor.
Roger Davis, 14385 80th Avenue, claimed he had never received any notification
until he got notice of the cost which he thought was very high. Because of the cost it was
out of the question for him, but he does want the water. He wondered about the medical
center in the area and its commercial use of the water.
Mr. Chastain advised that the medical zone parcel with 150' of frontage is included
in the plan.
Mr. Davis advised he had submitted a petition with 19 signatures, (copy filed with
the backup) which he had obtained when he went hurriedly to neighbors.
Katherine Wegel, 8060 142nd Street, wanted to get water from the county and was
willing to pay the costs to guarantee good water.
John Shipley, 8080 142"d Street, advised that he has paid plenty for his well and
water system. He requested a "no" vote.
Bob Green, 14325 80th Avenue, advised that he is in the water conditioning business
in Palm Beach County. He thought many people think they will get Perrier out of the
County's pipes. He has a 400' well with good water and a little sulphur in it.
Carol Green, 14325 80th Avenue, advised they use a water conditioner because they
like soft water. They use a reverse osmosis process for their drinking water.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
At Commissioner Adams' request, Mr. Chastain displayed a sketch of the area for the
proposed project and pointed out the lots that already have County water have been
eliminated from the total assessment cost of $236,891.
November 5, 2002
Discussion ensued and in response to the possibility of reducing the costs to the
homeowners, Utilities Director Erik Olson advised that the major unknown cost is labor
which depends on the market. He stated that because this is a small project, staff could
possibly perform the work although staff does not typically do these projects. He suggested
that staff try to figure out less costly ways to do this project, perhaps to combine it with
another small project. He pointed out that staffprefers to give a higher estimate initially and
most often the final cost/assessment comes in much lower.
Commissioner Adams advised that she could not vote for the project.
Commissioner Macht noted that the petition gave people three choices and none of
the signers wanted water. For that reason he would not vote to adopt the resolution.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously denied adoption
of the proposed resolution.
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ABINGTON WOODS PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (PD) SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL -
REQUESTED BY POPLAR DEVELOPMENT, INC. (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Division Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of October 28,
2002 using the site map on page 112, an aerial photograph to show vegetation, and the
layout design on page 113 to enhance his presentation.
November 5, 2002
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
�TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP i
Community Development birector
/J yr
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICPjv'r��\
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: October 28, 2002
SUBJECT: Poplar Development Inc.'s Request for Planned Development (PD) Special
Exception Use Approval for a Project to be Known as Abington Woods
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 5 2002
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
Schulke, Bittle, & Stoddard, Inc., on behalf of Poplar Development Inc., is requesting planned
development (PD) special exception use approval for a project to be known as "Abington Woods"
The site is located on the north side of 41st Street just west ofMeadowlark Woods Subdivision. The
applicant is requesting PD approval to obtain waivers (reductions) in lot size, lot width, setbacks, and
right-of-way width in return for greater perimeter setbacks and buffers, aesthetic amenities, wetlands
preservation, and upland preservation.
The project proposes 56 single-family detached homes on individual lots at an overall density of 1.96
units per acre. In addition, the project contains wetland and upland preservation areas, perimeter
buffers and recreation tracts.
Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of October 10, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
(6-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant PD special exception use
approval. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to approve the
preliminary PD plan/plat, subject to the Board approval of the special exception use
At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider the request and is to approve,
approve with conditions, or deny the special exception use request for the proposed planned
development Pursuant to section 971.05 of the land development regulations (LDRs), the Board is
to consider the appropriateness of the requested uses for the subject site and surrounding area. The
Board may attach reasonable conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure
compatibility of the uses with the surrounding area.
November 5, 2002
PD Project Process
The process involved in review and approval of the subject PD application is as follows:
Approval Needed
Conceptual Plan/Special Exception
Preliminary PD Plan/Plat
Land Development Permit (LDP) or Waiver
Final PD (plat)
The applicant is now requesting approval of the first two steps. If the request is approved by the
Board of County Commissioners, the preliminary PD plan/plat approval will become effective, and
the applicant will need to obtain an LDP or LDP waiver from the Public Works department for the
design of required PD improvements.
ANALYSIS:
1. Size of PD Area:
2. Zoning Classification:
3. Land Use Designations:
28.66 acres
RS -3, Residential Single -Family (up to 3 units/acre)
L-2, Low Density Residential 2 (up to 6 units/acre) for the
east 19.2 acres; L-1 Density Residential (up to 3 units/acre)
for the west 9.46 acres
Phasing: The project is proposed to be constructed in one phase.
Density:
3 units/acre (85 units)
1.96 units/acre (56 units)
Open Space:
Required. 40%
*Provided: 59 7%
*Note: Includes common green areas and recreation tracts, pedestrian ways, credit as
provided for in the LDRs for 2.05 acres of lake area, and minimum of 30% open space on
each lot.
Recreation Area and Pedestrian Improvements: The proposed project satisfies the PD
ordinance recreation area requirements as follows:
Required Recreation Area:
Provided Recreation Area:
0.67 acres
0.98 acres (includes recreation/park tracts with improvements,
and pedestrian systems)
The PD plan proposes an internal pedestrian system consisting of a 4' wide sidewalk along
one side of the project's roadways. Pedestrian improvements also include access to and
through portions of the recreation tracts. The proposed internal pedestrian system will
connect to an external, public sidewalk to be constructed on 4151 Street.
November 5, 2002
8. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
Y'I
North: Single Family Homes/RS-3
South: 4155 Street, Single Family Homes/RS-3
East. Single Family Homes (Meadowlark Woods)/RS-3
West: Single Family with barn/RS-3
9. Traffic Circulation: The development will be accessed from 415` Street by a local road
system that will be constructed with the development and will provide a two way, full
movement connection to 4151 Street. The internal roads will provide access to all lots and
form a loop and a cul-de-sac. The Traffic Engineering division has reviewed and approved
the internal circulation, connection to 4151 Street, and the project traffic impact statement
Based on the approved traffic statement, no off-site traffic improvements are required, and
none are proposed.
10. Stormwater Management: The public .works department has approved the conceptual
stormwater management plan and will review the detailed stormwater management plan with
the land development permit. The stormwater management system proposes to use a
centrally located lake which will outfall to the sub -lateral canal located along the south side
of 4151 Street.
11. Utilities: The site is required to connect to County water and sewer services, and the
applicant proposes these connections. These utility provisions have been approved by the
County Department of Utility Services and the Department of Health
12. Dedication and Improvements:
• Murphy Act Easement: There is a Murphy Act Easement which covers a portion of the
site adjacent to 41" Street. Since the easement extends 15' into the site beyond the
ultimate right-of-way, the county will support release of that 15' portion of the Murphy
Act which is in excess of the ultimate right-of-way and will have the portion that
overlaps the ultimate road right-of-way dedicated as 41" Street. The excess Murphy Act
easement covers green area which will not affect the subdivision designr therefore, the
excess easement area does not need to oe reieased to approve the PD, but will need to be
released prior to the issuance of an LDP.
• Right -of -Way :
EMIN
41St Street: The County Thoroughfare Plan map classifies 41st Street as a collector
road which requires 100' of ultimate right-of-way. Presently, there is 30' of
dedicated right-of-way existing. To create the local road right-of-way, the applicant
will need to dedicate 30' to the county, without compensation In addition, an
additional 40' will be dedicated to create the full 100'. Because that 40' area is
covered by a Murphy Act Easement and can be used for road construction purposes,
the applicant has agreed to provide the additional 40', and will seek a release on the
remainder of the Murphy Act Easement. The applicant will need to depict the
easement area as right-of-way on the final plat.
• Sidewalks: The previously described internal project sidewalks will be located within
private right-of-way and common areas and will be owned and maintained by a private
property owners association. In addition, prior to issuance of a certificate of completion,
a 5' wide public sidewalk will be built or bonded for along the site's 41" Street frontage.
November 5, 2002
49
r+r
OA
$SS
fl
4'
•
i?%
• Street Lights: Streetlights will be provided at all street entrances, intersections, and
curves and will be owned and maintained by a private property owners association.
• Limited Access Easement: A limited access easement is required along 41St Street and is
depicted on the preliminary plat. The easement will need to be granted prior to or via the
final plat.
• Stormwater and Recreation Tracts: Stormwater tracts, easements, and recreation tracts
will be the responsibility of a private property owners association.
13. Environmental Issues:
• Wetlands: The site contains 2.82 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, which are located in
the northeast comer of the project site. The applicant is proposing to preserve the
wetlands, therefore, no mitigation criteria apply However any nuisance exotic
vegetation on the site will be required to be removed In addition, the applicant is
proposing to place a conservation easement over the preserved wetlands.
• Native Upland Setaside: Since the site is over 5 acres and contains native uplands, the
county's native upland setaside regulations apply to this site. About half of the site (14.7
acres out of 28.66 acres) is native upland habitat. To satisfy the 2.21 acre (15%) setaside
requirement, the applicant proposes to establish 2.73 acres (18.57%) of upland
conservation easements over various tracts within the project.
14. Waivers: The PD plan proposes to reduce the minimum lot size standard from the RS -3
zoning district required 12,000 square feet to 9,375 square feet. The PD plan also proposes to
reduce the minimum lot width from 80' to 75', the minimum right-of-way from width 50' to
40', the minimum front and rear yard setbacks from 25' to 20', and the minimum side yard
setback from 15' to 7.5' and 10'. These requested waivers are mitigated by proposed buffers,
increased perimeter setbacks, conservation tracts, increased minimum open space, and
common recreational amenities. It should be noted that the homes will be set back 45' from
the perimeter (25' perimeter buffer tract plus 20' rear yard setback on the lot).
The project density of 1.96 units per acre is consistent with the densities of conventional
RS -3 subdivisions. These generally range from 1.5 to 2.6 units per acre, depending upon how
stormwater management is designed. In this case, the applicant's design trades some lot area
for common area (preservation areas and perimeter buffers). With a conventional (non -PD)
RS -3 subdivision, the common area would instead be included as part of individual lots. The
result would be bigger lots but less common area — although the density would be the same
under either option. Similar to the Kenwood Village PD design, this plan incorporates
perimeter buffers which provide a compatibility measure to compensate for the smaller lots
on the perimeter. In essence, the applicant s design does not spread the 1.96 units/acre over
as much land as a conventional (non -PD) RS -3 subdivision would, but provides a more
compact developed area. The preservation area, perimeter buffers, increased setbacks, and
density of 1.96 units/acre provide a development design which i s c ompatible with the
adjacent RS -3 zoned area.
November 5, 2002
50
The requested waivers are summarized and compared in the table below:
(1) The 7.5' side yard setback will apply to all 75' wide lots. All 80' wide lots (1-3, 15-18, 26-37)
will have a 10' side yard setback.
*Note: The applicant is proposing a 40' wide right-of-way with 10' utility and drainage easements
on either side of the right-of-way. This will form a 60' road and utility corridor and function like a
conventional 60' wide local road right-of-way. This arrangement allows for all necessary
infrastructure improvements and has been approved in other PD projects.
15. Buffers and Setbacks: Buffering is required and proposed as follows:
Perimeter
RS -3 Minimum Standard
Proposed Abington Woods
Minimum Standard
Lot Size
12,000 sq. ft.
9,375 sq. ft.
Lot Width
80 ft.
75 ft.
Front and Rear Yard Setback
25 ft.
20 ft.
Side Yard Setback for homes,
pools & enclosures
15 ft.
7.5 ft. and 10 ft. (1)
Perimeter Setback and Buffer
25 ft. No buffer required
45 ft., including 25 ft.
perimeter conservation
tract with Type "B" buffers.
Right -of -Way
50 ft curb and gutter
40 ft curb and gutter *
(1) The 7.5' side yard setback will apply to all 75' wide lots. All 80' wide lots (1-3, 15-18, 26-37)
will have a 10' side yard setback.
*Note: The applicant is proposing a 40' wide right-of-way with 10' utility and drainage easements
on either side of the right-of-way. This will form a 60' road and utility corridor and function like a
conventional 60' wide local road right-of-way. This arrangement allows for all necessary
infrastructure improvements and has been approved in other PD projects.
15. Buffers and Setbacks: Buffering is required and proposed as follows:
These buffer provisions exceed normal LDR and PD buffer requirements. Much of the
buffering will be done through the preservation of existing vegetation, although mfi11
planting will be done where necessary to meet the buffer criteria. Final, detailed landscape
plans for required buffers, common areas, and recreation/park tracts must be submitted to
planning staff and approved prior to land development permit issuance.
November 5, 2002
Perimeter
Minimum Required PD
Buffer
Proposed Buffer
East (adjacent to residential)
Type "C" buffer (10' wide)
with 25' wide building
setback for home.
Type "B" buffer (25' wide
conservation area)
West (adjacent to
residential/agricultural)
Type ` C" buffer (10' wide)
with 25' wide building
setback for home.
Type "B" buffer (25'wide
conservation area).
North (adjacent to residential)
Type "C" buffer (10' wide)
with 25' wide building
setback for home.
Type "B" buffer (25' wide
conservation area)
South (adjacent to 41'
Street, residential)
Type ' C' buffer (10' wide)
with 25' wide building
setback for home
Type "B" buffer (25' wide
conservation area).
These buffer provisions exceed normal LDR and PD buffer requirements. Much of the
buffering will be done through the preservation of existing vegetation, although mfi11
planting will be done where necessary to meet the buffer criteria. Final, detailed landscape
plans for required buffers, common areas, and recreation/park tracts must be submitted to
planning staff and approved prior to land development permit issuance.
November 5, 2002
�JC
16. Concurrency: The applicant has committed to obtaining a final concurrency certificate prior
to issuance of each single-family building permit and has acknowledged all concurrency
requirements. Therefore, all concurrency requirements related to PD plan and special
exception use approval have been satisfied.
17. Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plant: The County Comprehensive Plan requires that Caribbean
fruit fly host plants be prohibited within PDs located in general areas that have active citrus
groves. This project is located in such an area; therefore, the prohibition regulation applies.
The applicant has indicated that he has no objection to creating a restriction that would
prohibit host plants on the subject property. Such restriction must be included in the
project's covenants and restrictions which will be reviewed at the time of final plat
application.
18. Public B enefits: The benefits of the development are the proposed buffers, increased
perimeter setbacks increased conservation areas, increased minimum open space, common
recreational amenities, and pedestrian system.
RECO
ENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant PD
special exception use approval for "Abington Woods", with the following conditions:
1. That Caribbean fruit fly host plants are prohibited within the project area
2. That prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the developer shall:
a. Obtain release of a portion of the Murphy Act Easement as described in the
staff report, and
b. Obtain planning staff approval of detailed, final landscape plans for the
proposed buffers, common areas, and recreation/park tracts, and
3. That prior to or via the final plat, the developer shall:
a. Dedicate the depicted upland and wetland conservation easements, and
b. Install the depicted and approved perimeter buffer(s), and
c. Place a restriction on the property that prohibits the planting of Caribbean
fruit fly host plants.
4. The applicant will depict the non -released Murphy Act Easement area as right-of-way
on the final plat.
5. Prior to issuance of a certificate of completion, all nuisance exotic vegetation be
removed.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Proposed Preliminary PD Plans & Graphics
4. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
November 5, 2002
52
ti
V?t
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Beth Moyers lives at 6280 41' Street, which is the property just due west of the
project. Ms. Moyers understood from meetings with staff that the project will have a wall
behind her property as well as a 6' black chain link fence. She was concerned for her horses.
Director Boling confirmed her understanding. That is one of the conditions of the
detailed landscape plan and should work with the proposed vegetation. The intent is not
necessarily to keep people out, but to keep lawnmowers out and protect root systems.
Additional clarifications and discussion ensued.
Joe Schulke, Schulke, Bittle, & Stoddard, advised that he had met with Ms. Moyers
prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The engineers have committed to
provide a 6' wall between her lots on the west and Abington Woods Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, and
7, 8, and 9, which are adjacent to her property. They also agreed they would provide a
black -vinyl clad 6' chain link fence because of her security concern. These are shown on
sheet 3 of the submitted plans. It will be on the plans which will be stamped approved.
Additional discussion ensued to pinpoint the specific locations of the fencing.
Mr. Schulke described the conservation sign -posting required by St. Johns River
Water Management District at each of the property corners.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
November 5, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously granted PD
special exception use approval for "Abington Woods", with the
following conditions: 1) that Caribbean fruit fly host plants are
prohibited within the project area; 2) that prior to the issuance
of a land development permit, the developer shall: a.) Obtain
release of a portion of the Murphy Act Easement as described
in the staff report, and b.) Obtain planning staff approval of
detailed, final landscape plans for the proposed buffers,
common areas, and recreation/park tracts, and 3) that prior to or
via the final plat, the developer shall: a.) Dedicate the depicted
upland and wetland conservation easements, and b.) Install the
depicted and approved perimeter buffer(s), and c.) Place a
restriction on the property that prohibits the planting of
Caribbean fruit fly host plants; 4) the applicant will depict the
non -released Murphy Act Easement area as right-of-way on the
final plat; and 5) prior to issuance of a certificate of completion,
all nuisance exotic vegetation be removed. This motion also
includes the fence as discussed above.
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT -
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR AN
ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION FACILITY (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
November 5, 2002
Planning Division Director Stan Boling reviewed a memorandum of October 28,
2002, while displaying a colored site map of the area, an aerial, and a colored site plan. (On
file with the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board)
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
DE' ' MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP;1tommumt/Development Director
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Peter J. Radke; Senior Planner, Current Development
October 28, 2002
Florida Power and Light's Request for Special Exception Use Approval for an
Electrical Substation Facility
[SPMA-02-11-67/CDPLUS #2002080053-320171
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 5, 2002.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Mosby & Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for special exception and major site plan
approval on behalf of Florida Power and Light to construct an electrical substation on a ±5.00 -acre
site. Located at the northeast comer of the 12" Street/58' Avenue intersection, the subject site is zoned
RS -3 Residential Single -Family (up to 3 units per acre), and has an L-1, Low Density Residential -1
(up to 3 units per acre), land use designation Special exception use approval is needed to construct an
electrical substation in the RS -3 zoning district.
While the county zoning code does not specifically list an electrical substation as an allowable use in
the RS -3 zoning district, the code does list "limited public and private utilities" as an allowable use in
the RS -3 zoning district and the definition of limited public utilities does include electrical substations
(see attachment #5). Therefore, for zoning purposes staff has categorized the electrical substation as a
limited public utilities facility and applied the limited public utilities specific land use criteria from land
development regulation (LDR) chapter 971 to the project.
At its regular meeting of October 10, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to
recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the special exception use request with
the condition contained in the recommendation at the end of this report (please see attachment #6).
At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider the request and is to approve,
approve with conditions, or deny the special exception use request for the proposeo electrical
substation Pursuant to section 971.05 of the land development regulations (LDRs), the Board is to
consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and surrounding area The
Board may attach reasonable conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure
compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
November 5, 2002
ANALYSIS
1. Project Site Area: 217,800 sq. ft. or 5.00 acres
2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Residential, Single -Family (up to 3 units per acre)
3. Land Use Designation: L-1, Low Density Residential (up to 3 units per acre)
Proposed Building Area: 540 sq. ft. or 0.01 acres (unmanned facility)
I. Total Impervious Area: 35,650 sq. ft. or 0.82 acres
Open Space: Required. 40.0%
Proposed: 83.6%
Off -Street Parking: Required: 1 space
Provide& 1 space
Note: The space will be provided within the electrical substation on a crushed rock surface.
Since the substation will be unmanned and generally visited on an as needed basis, it is the
staff's opinion that the substation is an infrequent use for which paved parking requirements
can be waived if parking is provided on an approved stabilized surface. It is the County
Engineer's opinion that the proposed surface is suitable for the proposed infrequent use on
the subject site. By approving this site plan, the Planning and Zomng Commission will be
approving the use of a crushed rock/gravel surface for parking and driveway areas as
allowed by section 954.08(4) of the land development regulations.
Traffic Circulation: Access to the proposed project will be provided by a two-way full
movement paved driveway connection to 12th Street. A paved turn -around area will be
provided on-site for vehicles denied access to the facility.
Stormwater Management: The preliminary stormwater management plan has been
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The proposed plan provides a wet
stormwater management tract (lake) in the western portion of the site. Pursuant to Chapter
930 of the LDRs, a County Type "A" Stormwater Permit will be required prior to site plan
release.
Landscape Plan: The proposed landscape plan has been reviewed by Planning Division
staff and meets the requirements of Chapter 926 of the LDRs for interior, roadway, and non-
vehicular open space landscaping areas. Since the site abuts residentially designated land to
the north and east, a Type "B" buffer with a 6 -foot opaque feature is required and proposed
along both the north and east proper y lines Since the site abuts throroughfare plan
roadways along its west (canal and 58th Avenue) and south (12th Street) property lines, a Type
"D" buffer with a 6 -foot opaque feature is required and proposed along both the west and
south property lines.
To meet the 6 -foot opaque feature requirement, the applicant is proposing a 6 -foot earth berm
with landscaping along the east and north property lines and a 6 -foot berm/hedge
combination along the west and south property lines. Planning Division staff supports the
applicant's request to use a berm and landscape buffer to establish the 6 -foot opaque feature.
This will provide a continuous plant line around the entire perimeter of the subject site.
Abutting the subject site to the north and east is the Oaks of Vero Planned Development,
which was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Feburary 13, 2001. A
November 5, 2002
condition of that approval is that the project provide a landscape buffer and 6 -foot opaque
feature around the entire subdivision including those areas adjacent to the north and east
boundaries of the subject Florida Power and Light site. Florida Power and Light has
coordinated with Oaks of Vero representatives to ensure a seamless landscape strip between
both projects along 12th Street and to use a shared berm along the projects' mutual property
lines The LDRs do allow and other projects have been approved to overlap required buffers
into a single buffer that meets the requirements of both projects
10. Utilities: Since a restroom is proposed for the 540 sq. ft. building, the facility will be served
by the County Utility Services Department for potable water and sewer services Connection
to public water and sewer services has been approved by the Utility Services Department and
the Department of Health
11. Required Improvements: As per the county's Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, an 8 -foot wide
sidewalk is required and proposed along the subject site's entire 12th Street frontage. The
applicant will be required to construct or bond -out the sidewalk improvement prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project.
12. Specific Land Use Criteria for Utilities, Public and Private — Limited f971.44(3)J:
a. See Chapter 901 for definition of utilities, public and private limited;
Note: As previously discussed in this staff report, an electrical sub -station is included in the
definition of limited public or private utilities.
b. Between all above -ground facilities (except distribution and collection facilities) and
adjacent property having a residential land use designation a Type "B" buffer (reduce to
Type "C" where abutting a local roadway, reduce to "D" buffer where abutting a
thoroughfare plan roadway) (with six-foot opaque screening) as specified in Chapter
926, Landscaping, shall be provided;
Note: As stated in section nine of this staff report, the landscape plan depicts Type "B"
buffers with 6 -foot opaque features along the site's north and east property lines, which abut
residentially designated property and Type "D" buffers with 6 -foot opaque features along the
site's west and south property lines, which abut thoroughfare plan roadways.
c. All below -ground high voltage cables within a utility right-of-way shall be made known
to the public through the use of signs posted therein;
Note: A note has been placed on the site plan stating that all below -ground high voltage
cables within a utility right-of-way shall be made known to the public through the use of
signs posted therein;
d. In all zoning districts except the industrial districts, all equipment, machinery and
facilities which cannot by their size or nature be located within an enclosed building
shall be separated from adjacent properties having a residential land use designation by
a Type "D" buffer (with six-foot opaque screening) as specified in Chapter 926,
Landscaping;
Note: All equipment will either be in a building or screened by a buffer that meets or exceeds
a Type ' D" buffer.
e. Driveways located in close proximity to adjacent properties having a residential land use
designation shall provide a six-foot opaque screening between the driveway and adjacent
November 5, 2002
property. An eight foot opaque screen may be required if deemed necessary to mitigate
noise and visual impacts.
Note: Since the site driveway will be located ±800 feet from the site's eastern property line
and since the site abuts a canal and 58`h Avenue right-of-way along its western property line,
no separate, special screening is required for the site driveway.
13. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Oaks of Vero PD (approved; currently grove)/RS-3
South: 12th Street, Citrus Grove/A-1
East: Oaks of Vero PD (approved; currently grove)/RS-3
West: 58th Avenue, Old Citrus Grove/A-1
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners find
that, in conjunction with the recommended condition:
1. It is empowered under the provisions of Chapter 971 to review the special exception applied for;
2. The granting of the special exception will not adversely affect the public interest;
3. The application satisfies the general and specific criteria required for special exception approval;
and
4. The condition stated below is adequate to ensure compatibility between the special exception use
and surrounding land uses.
Staff further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use
approval for the electrical substation facility with the following condition:
1. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the facility, the 12th Street sidewalk shall be
constructed or bonded -out.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Site Plan
4. Landscape Plan
5. LDR Section 901.03
6. Approved Minutes from the 10/10/02 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
November 5, 2002
Commissioner Ginn suggested there be a provision for maintenance of the
landscaping because their other facility is a mess.
Director Boling advised that he would follow up on her observation.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Bruce Moia, Mosby & Associates, Inc., advised he was present to answer any
questions and FPL representatives were also present.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously found that, in
conjunction with the recommended condition: 1) It is
empowered under the provisions of Chapter 917 to review this
special exception applied for; 2) The granting of the special
exception will not adversely affect the public interest; 3) The
application satisfies the general and specific criteria required for
special exception approval; and 4) The condition stated below
is adequate to ensure compatibility between the special
exception use and surrounding land uses. Further, the Board
granted special exception use approval for the electrical
substation facility with the following condition: 1) Prior to
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the facility, the 12th
Street sidewalk shall be constructed or bonded -out. Prior to
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the facility, the 12th
Street sidewalk shall be constructed or bonded -out.
November 5, 2002
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-028 - INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT (IRCHD)- REQUEST TO
REZONE APPROXIMATELY 3.50 ACRES FROM RM -10 TO PD AND
APPROVE THE CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN FOR THE GIFFORD
HEALTH CENTER (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Division Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of October 29,
2002 using a location map in color, an aerial, and additional visuals showing the subject
property's location and relationship to nearby properties (on file in the backup in the office
of the Clerk to the Board).
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
DEMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, • CP; Community De
r
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Planning Director -'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
elopment Director
Peter Radke; Senior Planner, Current Development
October 29, 2002
Indian River County Hospital District's Request to Rezone Approximately 3.50
Acres from RM -10 to PD and Request to Approve the Conceptual PD Plan for
the Gifford Health Center
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 5, 2002.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
This is a request by the Indian River County Hospital District, through its agent, Carter Assoicates,
Inc , to rezone approximately 3.50 acres from RM -10, residential multi -family (up to 10 units per
acre) to PD (Planned Development) to develop an office and medical services clinic, which will be
known as the Gifford Health Center. The subject site is located at the southwest corner of the 28th
Court/47`h Street intersection. As part of the rezoning request, conceptual and preliminary PD plans
have been submitted for approval. The purpose of this request is to secure a zoning district that
allows for certain non-residential uses that will include an office and a medical services clinic. The
proposed health clinic is not allowed under the site's current RM -10 zoning, but is allowable under
November 5, 2002
60
3;
the site's PUB (Public) land use designation. Under the PUB designation, a rezoning to PD will
allow the office and medical service clinic uses as proposed, and will allow the county greater
control over the project design and limitations on allowable uses.
fr PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION:
At its regular meeting of October 24, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
unanimously (6-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the PD rezoning
and conceptual plan with the conditions as recommended by staff. In addition, the Planning and
Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plat/plan approval, subject to the Board of County
Commissioners' approval of the PD rezoning request and the PD conceptual plan.
➢ DEVELOPMENT ISSUE AND APPROVAL OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE
APPLICANT:
An office and medical services clinic is not allowed in the RM -10 zoning district, but is allowed as a
permitted use in the MED, (Medical), CL (Limited Commercial), and CG (General Commercial)
zoning districts. All three commercial zoning districts are permitted under the PUB land use
designation. Following are the two options available for the applicant to seek approval for the
proposed project
❖ Option 1
Submit an application to rezone the subject property from RM -10 to MED, CL, or CG. If the
property were rezoned to MED, CL, or CG then the applicant would need to also submit a
major site plan application for the project.
Option 2
Submit concurrent applications to rezone the subject property to PD and approve a
conceptual and preliminary PD plan/plat.
It is staffs position that the PD rezoning process is the best option for accomplishing the applicant's
objective. Therefore, staff encouraged the applicant to pursue the PD rezoning option. A rezoning
to MED, CL or CG would allow many different types of commercial uses that may not be desirable
in the area of the subject site. Unlike standard commercial zoning districts, a PD zoning district
provides the county more control o‘ er the type of uses allowed on site and provides the county the
ability to set specific design requirements.
➢ THE PD ZONING DISTRICT, GENERALLY:
Several non-residential PD projects have been approved by the county through the PD rezoning
process. Unlike standard zoning districts there are no specific size or dimension cnteria for PD
districts. Instead, the PD district is based on the underlying land use plan designation for density and
use limitations, and on compatibility requirements. In the PD zoning district, specific allowable
uses setbacks and other typical zoning district regulations are established on a site -by -site basis
through approval of a conceptual PD plan. Aesthetic design standards may also be required under
the PD rezoning process. Adopted as part of the PD zoning for a property, the conceptual PD plan
serves as the zoning standard for the site.
A rezoning to the PD district requires the submission of a binding conceptual PD plan which, along
with certain PD district requirements, limits uses and sets forth specific development standards on
the site. Thus, a PD rezoning allows a unique PD district to be developed specifically for each
development site.
In this case, the conceptual and preliminary PD plans propose a 10,642 square foot office and
medical services clinic facility on 3.50 acres. Aspects of the proposed conceptual and preliminary
PD will be addressed in the "Plan Analysis" section of the staff report.
November 5, 2002
61
Lit
THE PD REZONING PROCESS:
The PD rezoning review, approval, and development process is as follows:
STEP 1.
STEP 2.
STEP 3.
STEP 4.
STEP 5.
STEP 6.
Rezoning and Conceptual PD Plan Approval: Review and recommendation
made by staff and by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Final action
taken by the Board of County Commissioners.
Preliminary PD Plan/Plat (combination of site plan and preliminary plat)
Approval: Review and recommendation made by staff. Final action taken by
the Planning and Zoning Commission
Land Development Permit or Permit Waiver: Reviewed and issued by staff
for construction of subdivision improvements (road, utilities, drainage).
Building Permit(s): Reviewed and issued by staff for construction of
buildings.
Final PD Plat Approval: Review and recommendation made by staff. Final
action taken by the Board of County Commissioners.
Certificate of Occupancy: Reviewed and issued by staff for use and
occupancy of buildings.
The applicant is pursuing approval of Steps 1 and 2 at this time.
Once a PD conceptual plan is approved, only minor modifications to the conceptual plan can be
approved at a staff level. Any proposed changes that would intensify the site use (e.g increase the
maximum building area) or reduce compatibility elements (e.g. reduced buffering) may be approved
only via a process involving public hearings held by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and
the Board of County Commissioners.
➢ PROPOSED PD DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT SITE:
The subject site has a PUB (Public) land use designation. The PUB land use designation allows a
variety of commercial and industrial zoning districts for uses that serve public purposes. Since the
land use designation controls the use of the property by limiting the applicable zoning districts, any
rezoning must be compatible with the uses allowed by the property's land use designation. Once a
specific PD rezoning is approved for a site, the applicable PD conceptual plan adopted as part of the
rezoning limits the type of specific uses and intensity of development on the site and establishes the
site's dimensional criteria.
Although PD zoning district parameters are flexible, certain standards related to uses, compatibility
(buffering), infrastructure improvements, and open space are set forth in Chapter 915 (P ID Process
and Standards for Development Ordinance) of the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs).
Based upon the proposed conceptual PD plan and the Chapter 915 standards, the proposed PD
district for the subject site contains the special elements identified in the table below. That table also
lists corresponding RM -10 district criteria for comparison purposes. The table illustrates that the
proposed PD district will allow all the same uses that are allowed in the RM -10 district plus office
and medical clinic facilities
November 5, 2002
62
lit
•
ote: ll
Element
RM-10 Zoning District
Proposed PD District
Uses Allowed
Residential, Institutional,
Community Service, and other
uses as listed in LDR section
911.08
Same as allowed in RM-10
with following additions:
offices and medical services
_ clinics are permitted uses
Minimum Open
Space
30%
30%
Maximum Building Coverage
25%
25%
Building Setbacks:
Front (east & north):
25 feet
25 feet
Side (west):
10 feet
50 feet*
Rear (south):
25 feet
25 feet
us setback applies to building, parking and driveway area.
REZONING ANALYSIS
> EXISTING ZONING & LAND USE PATTERN
❖
Zonin2 Pattern
The subject property and all surrounding property are zoned RM -10. Currently, the subject property
is vacant land. To the west of the subject property are single-family homes. Single-family homes
also exist to north of the subject property, across 47th Street. An institutional use, the Gifford Middle
School, exists to the east of the subject property, across 28th Court. The existing health clinic is
located across 28th Court from the site in the Gifford Middle School general campus area but will be
relocated to the subject property via this project. The existing health clinic functions as an accessory
use to the school, which allows the clinic to be located on the School Board's RM -10 zoned site.
County owned land containing an historic church building and accessory `park" improvements
(includes restroom facilities) exists to the south of the subject property.
❖ Future Land Use Map Pattern
The subject property and the property to the south have a Public land use designation All
surrounding properties have an M-2, Medium Density (Up to 10 units per acre), land use
designation. The proposed PD rezomng of the subject property is consistent with the County's Future
Land Use Map.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with the policies of the comprehensive plan and
must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use
Map. These include agricultural, residential, recreation conservation, and commercial and industrial
land uses. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated
areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies
are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the County will take in order to direct the
community's development As courses of action committed to by the County, policies provide the
basis for all County land development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests Of particular
applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives.
Future Land Use Policy 1.28 states that the Public land use designation shall be applied to land used
for public facilities and services. Since the proposed facility, which will be owned by a public entity
(Indian River County Hospital District), will house offices for the District and a public medical
services clinic, the proposed rezoning is consistent with policy 1.28
November 5, 2002
63
•
Future Land Use Policy 1.40 states that the county shall collocate public facilities. In this case, the
proposed Gifford Health Center will be located adjacent to the Gifford Middle School and a county
park. Due to the collocation between the school and health center, the proposed rezoning is
consistent with policy 1.40
Future Land use Policy 2.8 states that public health facilities should be located within downtown or
other areas providing easy access for county residents. The proposed Gifford Health Center will be
located in an area of the county with some of the highest residential densities, where there is high
demand for public health clinic services, and which will enable easy access for many existing and
future county residents. In addition, the subject site is located only 800 feet north of 45th Street
which is designated as a collector road on the county's Thoroughfare Plan Map. As a result of the
surrounding high residential densities and the proximity of the subject site to 45th Street, the
proposed rezoning is consistent with policy 2 8
Future Land Use Policy 4.1 states that land use districts shall be located in a manner that
concentrates urban uses, thereby discouraging sprawl. The subject property has existing residential
or institutional uses along all property lines and lies within a high-density area. In addition, the
proposed site is located within an established neighborhood with an existing concentration of
residential, commercial, and institutional uses. Since development of the subject property fora new
health center will enhance the neighborhood, continue a health clinic use in the immediate area, and
contribute to a concentration of institutional uses in a high-density area, the proposed rezoning is
consistent with policy 4.1.
Future Land Use Policy 5.4 encourages the use of the Planned Development (PD) overlay district to
provide design flexibility. The PD overlay zoning district provides the ability to narrow the range of
uses allowed on site and control site development and appearance. In this instance, the PD district
will allow the office and medical services clinic use to operate on the subject property in a manner
compatible with the surrounding area Since the subject PD re -zoning and plan incorporate PD
overlay district design flexibility to provide for a specific site -appropriate use with sufficient design
controls, the proposed rezoning is consistent with Policy 5.4.
Based on the above referenced specific policies and the land use plan, the request is consistent with
the comprehensive plan.
COMPATIBILITY
Staffs position is that granting the request to rezone the property to the proposed PD district will
result in development that will be compatible with the surrounding areas. Existing public facilities
exist to the east and south of the subject property. The Gifford Middle School and current health
clinic are located east of the subject property, across 28th Court, and a park is located south of the
subject property. Therefore, the proposed development will be compatible with those two adjacent
uses.
Existing single-family residential units exist to the north across 47`h Street and immediately west of
the subject property To ensure compatibility between the subject site and the adjacent houses,
landscape buffers will be required along the north and west property lines. Along the north property
line the applicant will be required to install a Type D/local roadway landscape buffer. Along the
west property line, the applicant will be required to install a type C landscape buffer. While 47th
Street provides good separation from the houses to the north, a special 50 -foot setback is being
established through this PD process to provide more separation between the site improvements
(building, parking, and driveways) and the residential lots to the west.
For those reasons, the proposed development of the subject property will be compatible with
surrounding areas.
iNovember 5, 2002
64
i
Is
CONCURRENCY IMPACTS
Staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including stormwater management,
roads, solid waste, wastewater, and water, have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed use
of the subject PD district. The applicant will be required to obtain a concurrency certificate prior to
site plan release and building permit issuance.
PD PLAN ANALYSIS:
The conceptual PD plan proposes an office and medical services clinic.
1. Project Site Area: 3.50Acres
Zoning Classification:
Current: RM -10, Residential Multi -Family (up to 10 units per acre)
Proposed: PD Planned Development
�. Land Use Designation: PUB, Public
Building Area: 6,385 sq. ft. for government office
4,257 sq. ft. for medical services clinic
Total 10,642 sq. ft.
Note: The proposed building will be located over 100 feet from the west property line.
Impervious Area: 40,444 sq. ft.
Open Space:
Required in RM -10: 30%
Proposed in PD District: 30%
Provided: 73%
Parking: Required: 41 spaces
Provided: 44 spaces
Note: Due to the fact that 60% of the building will be allocated for government office space
for the Indian River County Hospital District, the proposed facility was classified as a
government building frequented by the public. Such a use requires 1 parking space per 260
sq. ft. of gross floor area and is greater than the general office rate of 1 parking space per 300
sq. ft.
Traffic Circulation: The PD plan proposes two full movement two-way driveway
connections to 47th Street. A drop-off area is provided on the east side of the building to
facilitate loading and unloading of visitors to the facility. That drop-off area has been
designed to accommodate the safe movement of buses such as the Community Coach
vehicles. A delivery area is provided along the west side of the building. Traffic
Engineering Division staff has approved those driveway connections and the internal
circulation plan.
A traffic impact statement has been reviewed and approved by Traffic Engineering Division.
Based on that statement, no off-site traffic improvements are required in conjunction with
this project and none are proposed.
November 5, 2002
•
9. Stormwater Management: The project's conceptual stormwater management plan has been
approved by the public works department, and the developer will be required to obtain a
Type "A' county stormwater permit prior to site plan release. One dry retention area is
proposed for the subject site and will be located in the west area of the site. All stormwater
runoff will be retained on site.
10. Utilities: The project is required to connect to County water and sewer, and such
connections are proposed. These utility provisions have been approved by the County
Utilities Department and the Environmental Health Department.
11. Landscape Plan and Buffers: The landscape plan is in compliance with LDR Chapter 926.
This includes a Type C buffer and 3 -foot opaque feature on the west property line, a Type C
landscape buffer along the south property line, and type D landscape buffers along the north
and east property lines.
12. Required Improvements:
a. 47th Street Sidewalk: A 4 -foot wide sidewalk is required and is shown on the plan along
the site's entire 47`h Street frontage. Said sidewalk will need to be completed or bonded -
out prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the facility.
b. 28' Court Sidewalk: A 4 -foot sidewalk is required and is shown on the plan along the
site's entire 28`h Court frontage. Said sidewalk will need to be completed or bonded -out
prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the facility.
13. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: 47th Street, Single-Family/RM-10
South: County Park/RM-10
East: 28th Court, Gifford Middle School & Existing Health Clinic/RM-10
West: Single-Family/RM-10
14. Public Benefits: In its proposed location, the Gifford Health Center will be the only health
care facility located in the Gifford area. This facility will be a primary care clinic serving the
adult and pediatric health care needs of the residents of the county and in particular those
residing in and about the general area of the facility. All services will be offered on a sliding
fee scale based upon family size and income. Therefore, the central location for all county
residents, the specific location for Gifford residents, and the availability of affordable health
care are the public benefits offered by this project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
conceptual PD plan and the rezoning to PD, with the following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must construct or bond out the
required 47th Street sidewalk; and
2. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must construct or bond out the
required 28th Court sidewalk
November 5, 2002
"f
66
t
ATTACHMENTS.
4
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Preliminary PD Plan
4. Landscape Plan
5. Ordinance
6. Unapproved Minutes from the 10/24/02 Planning and Zoning Commission Meetin
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
Harry Volwell, Indian Harbor Road, a Trustee of the IRMHD, headed up the
Hospital District's efforts to build a new clinic. The hardest part of the whole effort was
finding the land. He credited Chairman Stanbridge for helping to find the property. The
project is now underway. They have been able to raise a lot of money and projected costs
are on budget. He came to say thank you to the Commissioners, especially to Chairman
Stanbridge.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Tippin, to approve staff's
recommendation.
Chairman Stanbridge thanked the special people involved in this effort.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (Ordinance No. 2002-028 adopted
amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning
November 5, 2002
67
L !
x°f
•
Map from RM -10 to PD for the property located on the
southwest corner of 28th Court and 47th Street and described
herein and providing for effective date. Further the Board
approved the conceptual PD plan and the rezoning to PD, with
the following conditions: 1) Prior to issuance of a certificate of
occupancy, the applicant must construct or bond out the
required 47`" Street sidewalk; and 2) Prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy, the applicant must construct or bond
out the required 28th Court sidewalk.)
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-028
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM
RM -10 TO PD FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF 28TH COURT AND 47TH STREET AND DESCRIBED HEREIN AND
PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local
planning agency on such matters, held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation
regarding this rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida to -wit:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 1 of Martin Luther King Jr. Community Center Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 16,
Page 98, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida
Be changed from RM -10, Residential Multi -Family (up to 10 units per acre) to PD (Planned
Development).
All with meaning and intent as set forth and described in said land development regulations,
and the attached approved conceptual PD plan and landscape plan.
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of
State.
November 5, 2002
68
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 028
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida on this 5th day of November, 2002.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal on the 23`d day of October, 2002, for
public hearing to be held on the 5th day of November, 2002 at which time at the final hearing it was
moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , seconded by Commissioner
Ti ppi n , and adopted by the following vote;
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
'. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONN-ERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY 624 Air :4 --ti
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Effective Date: Filed with the Department of State on the day of , 2002.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
William G. Collins, II
Deputy County Attorney
APP • • VED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
RohErt eating, AICP
Community Development Diretor
November 5, 2002
Indian River Ca
Approved
Date
Admin.
t- , f?�
r ✓ g7
Legal
`'.C.-{
iI
G
Budget
/
�t / /0
Dept.
d�`
Risk Mgr.
ff//
RohErt eating, AICP
Community Development Diretor
November 5, 2002
• •
(CLERK'S NOTE- AT 10:20 AM, THE CHAIRMAN CALLED A 5
MINUTE RECESS. THE MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 10:28
A.M.)
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - CHRISTIAN OUTREACH
INTERNATIONAL, INC. - REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A RETREAT CENTER
AND APPEAL OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S
DENIAL OF MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR PHASE I OF THE
RETREAT CENTER (Quasi-judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Commissioner Ginn, Commissioner Adams, and Chairman Stanbridge advised they
had received information (A copy is in the backup in the Office of the Clerk to the Board.)
concerning this matter but were not aware it had come from COI. In response to questions
from Attorney Bruce Barkett (attorney for the applicant), all Commissioners indicated they
would be able to be open and objective at this hearing.
Planning Division Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of October 29,
2002 with site map and an aerial to show surrounding properties and their relation to the
urban service area.
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
DEQ' TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Ro.ert M. Keating, CP
-44
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Planning Direc or
e
ommuni�' evelopment Director
vsk
FROM: John W McCoy; Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: October 29, 2002
November 5, 2002
70
ID;
1
SUBJECT: Christian Outreach International, Inc.'s Request for Special Exception and
Conceptual Site Plan Approval for a Retreat Center and Appeal of the Planning
and Zoning Commission's Denial of Major Site Plan Approval for Phase I of the
Retreat Center
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of November 5, 2002
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Mosby and Associates, Inc has submitted an application on behalf of Chnstian Outreach International,
Inc. to construct a Christian retreat center. The applicant is requesting conceptual special exception
approval for the overall development and concurrent major site plan approval for the first phase. The
applicant proposes to construct a 63 bed retreat center, consisting of 8 cabins, an auditorium, dining
hall chapel, recreation hall with pool, office, and administrative center. Christian Outreach
International is a non-denommational mission organization. The purpose of the retreat center will be
to train mission teams (See Attachment # 5 ).
The subject site is zoned A-1, Agricultural -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres), and is located outside the urban
service area on the south side of 12th Street, just west of the First Church of God. Special exception use
approval is required for a "retreats and camps" use in the A-1 zoning district.
At its regular meeting of October 10, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
(6-0) to recommend that the special exception use request for the retreat be denied. Based on its
recommendation to deny the use request, the Planning and Zoning Commission also denied the
Phase I major site plan request. The applicant is now requesting that the Board approve the special
exception use request and overturn the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial of the Phase I
major site plan. If the Board of County Commissioners approves the special exception use request,
the Phase I major site plan should also be approved.
At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider the requests and is to approve,
approve with conditions, or deny the special exception use and appeal requests for the proposed
retreat camp Pursuant to section 971.05 of the land development regulations (LDRs), the Board is
to consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and surrounding area. The.
Board may approve the request and attach reasonable conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate
impacts and to ensure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. Alternatively, the Board
may deny the request.
ANALYSIS
1. Project Phasing:
Phase One: Retreat lodge 4,200 sq. ft.* (16 beds), 1,800 sq. ft. office, 2,500 sq. ft.* storage
buildings.
Assembly Hall (7,800 sq. ft), Dining Hall (2,120 sq. ft.)
8 cabins (63 beds total with the retreat lodge converted to classrooms)
Recreation Hall with Pool (4 464 sq. ft.)
Chapel (1,848 sq. ft.)
Phase Two:
Phase Three:
Phase Four:
Phase Five:
*Note: involves renovation and use of existing single-family house and barn/storage buildings
on site.
November 5, 2002
71
4
1
b-
1� 3
61
Project Site Area: 15.95 acres or 684,782 sq. ft.
Zoning Classification: A-1, Agricultural (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
Land Use Designation: Ag -1, Agricultural 1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
Density: Permitted: 4 people per acre**
Proposed. 3.95 people per acre
**Note: Per person density measure for "retreats and camps" uses
Building Area and Coverage:
Phase I:
Phase if
Phase III:
Phase IV:
Phase V:
Total:
proposed
proposed
proposed
proposed
Area Coverage (% of site)
8,500 sq. ft.*** 1.22%
9,920 sq. ft. 2.6%
7,904 sq. ft. 3.8%
4,464 sq. ft. 4.4%
1,848 sq. ft. 4.7%
32,636 sq. ft. 4.7%
7. Open Space: Required: 60.0%
Proposed: 85.2%
Note: The proposed open space includes 2.87 acres of lake area for open space credit.
8. Impervious Surface Area: 94,408 sq. ft. or 14.8%
9. Stormwater Management: The preliminary stormwater management plan has been
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Two wet ponds are proposed for
the site. The smaller pond will be centrally located and provide stormwater treatment for the
first phase The larger stormwater pond will be an expansion (phase 11) of an existing pond
located along the west property line. Both ponds will be connected and eventually outfall
mto the ditch on the south side of 12th Street. Pursuant to Chapter 930 of the LDR's, a
County Type "B" Stormwater Permit will be required prior to site plan release.
10. Off -Street Parking:
Cumulative
Phase L Required*
Provided:
14 spaces
19 spaces (paved)
Phase IP Required:
Provided:
14 spaces
49 spaces (paved)
Phase IIF Required:
Provided:
November 5, 2002
36 spaces
49 spaces (paved)
Phase IV: Required: 36 spaces
Provided: 49 spaces (paved)
Phase V: Required: 70 spaces
(build -out) Provided: 75 spaces (52 paved, 23 grass)
Note: The above figures are cumulative with subsequent phases including spaces from the
previous phases. The specific land use criteria allow for grassed parking with the approval of
the Public Works Director
11. Traffic Circulation: The site will be accessed from 12th Street by a new 22' wide, two way
driveway. The driveway will be located at the west side of the property, will be a full
movement driveway, and will provide access to all internal parking spaces and a looped turn
around located in the second phase. There is an existing, non -conforming driveway to the
site which is too narrow and too close to the east property line to serve as the project
driveway but can serve as the construction access point for the first three phases. Thus, this
existing driveway will be temporarily retained for construction access and will be removed at
the end of Phase III Traffic Engineering has reviewed and approved the mternal circulation
plan, new driveway connections, and temporary use of the existing connection
The site uses 12th Street for access. The portion of 12th Street west of 58t Avenue is unpaved
and will need to be paved from the project driveway to 58th Avenue prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for Phase III.
Also, Traffic Engineering has approved the project traffic impact statement. Based on that
approval, no off-site traffic improvements except the paving of 12th Street are required.
12. Landscape Plan: The proposed landscape plan for Phase I meets the criteria of Chapter 926
of the LDRs for landscaping. Buffering is addressed in section 18 of this report. Landscape
plans for additional phases will be submitted with the formal site plan application for each
successive phase.
13. Utilities: The site is located outside of and not adjacent to the urban service area. Thus, the
project cannot be connected to public utilities. Therefore, the site will need to be served by
on-site potable water and sewage systems. At this time, the applicant is still coordinating
with the Health Department regarding approvable facilities for the project The Health
Department has signed off on the first phase, but will need to see additional details for
subsequent phases. Those details will need to be submitted with the major site plan for
subsequent phases, if the overall project is approved.
14. Fire Protection: Since the site is located outside of and not adjacent to the urban service
area, it cannot be served by public water to meet project fire protection needs. Based on the
facility being used as a place of assembly and lodging, there are certain fire protection
requirements that apply. The applicant will be required to fire sprinkler the 4,200 sq. ft.
retreat lodge (consists of renovating the existing 4,200 sq. ft. house) and install a dry hydrant
in phase 1 and a fire pump to serve subsequent phases. The additional details necessary to
support the fire protection plan for subsequent phases will be provided with the major site
plan for those phases.
November 5, 2002
73
•
15. Environmental Issues:
➢ Uplands: Since the subject site is greater than five acres, the native upland set aside
criteria of land development regulation section 929.05 apply. Most of the site, however,
is old grove or pasture with some very limited native vegetation along the north and west
property lines. The environmental planning staff has inspected the site and verified that
the area along the north and west property lines does not constitute native upland habitat.
Therefore, no setaside requirements apply.
➢ Wetlands: There are jurisdictional wetlands on the subject site around the fringe of the
existing pond. The applicant is not proposing to impact those wetlands; therefore, no
mitigation or wetlands permits are required
16. Dedication and Improvements:
> Paving of 12`h Street: According to the 58th Avenue road paving plans, the county will
pave 12th Street along a portion of the frontage of the adjacent property to the east (First
Church of God) as part of the 58th Avenue project. Phases I and If of the proposed retreat
project are considered to constitute a small trip attractor/generator (less than 100 ADT).
As such, paved access to the subject site via 12th Street is not required for Phases I & II
At phase 111, the project s trip intensity will exceed the threshold for a large trip
attractor/generator (more than 100 ADT). This will require the applicant to ensure that
12th Street is paved from the project's driveway to the paved portion of 12th Street.
Therefore, the 12th Street paving must be accomplished prior to issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy for phase III
17. General Criteria for Special Exception Uses:
The County LDR's describe special exception uses as follows:
"Special exception uses, generally. Special exception uses are those types of uses
that would not generally be appropriate throughout a particular zoning district.
However when special exception uses are carefully controlled as to number, area,
location, and/or relationship to the vicinity, such uses would not adversely impact the
public health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, morals and
general welfare and as such would be compatible with permitted uses within the
particular zoning district."
Although "retreats and camps" are listed as a special exception uses in the A-1
zoning district, the "retreats and camps" use is not defined in the County's land
development regulations. To address this and other deficiencies, staff has initiated
an LDR amendment which the Board and County Commissions will consider at a
later date. Existing "retreat and camp" facilities in the county, however, provide
useful examples of the site development characteristics (size, building coverage, open
space, etc.) of the other camps and retreats within the county These include the Boy
Scout Camp, Shiloh Youth Ranch, Life for Youth Ranch, and Harvest Christian
Retreat. A companson of these facilities indicates that there are several common
features among them These include very low building coverage, very high open
space, and a generally large land area (average of 48 acres). Please see comparison
on attachment #6. In addition, most of these facilities were remotely located when
initially developed, although development has occurred adjacent to three of these
facilities over the years.
November 5, 2002
74
JI
•
•
4.4(4
In staff's opinion, "retreats or camps" in rural areas need to be natural resourced
based with the major attraction being some type of natural feature or agricultural
character. In more urbanized areas, it is logical to expect a greater concentration
place of assembly type uses with more man made recreational amenities, such as is
common at resorts and convention facilities. In this particular instance, the applicant
is proposing a 7,800 sq. ft. assembly hall and separate recreation hall and large pool.
These features are more indicative of a more urban type of development, and are not
consistent with maintaining the rural character of the subject 16 acre site. Staff
considered these factors during its evaluation of this apphcation under the general
special exception use criteria.
The following general special exception use criteria apply to all special exception uses.
A. The Board is empowered under the provisions of Chapter 971 to review special
exception use applications.
Note: The Board is authorized to review and take action to approve, approve with
conditions, or deny this special exception use application
B. The Board must determine whether or not granting the special exception use will
adversely affect the public interest.
Note: In order to evaluate effects on the public interest, the following functions need
to be reviewed: access to the property, off-street parking utilities, effects on
adjoining property and the general area, screening and buffering, setbacks, signage,
and any specific criteria related to the proposed use.
Through the site plan design and the 12th Street paving and escrow conditions
previously described in this report access to the property and provision for parking
are adequately addressed. Compliance with utilities environmental health, and fire
protection requirements also appears to be possible if the proposed alternative and
on-site systems are used and properly maintained over time. Were this project located
inside the urban service area, however, then long term compliance would be ensured
by connection to public water and sewer utilities.
Due to the proposed intensity of the project and layout of building and active open
space areas the project's effects on surrounding properties and the general area will
be negative. In addition, no special buffering or significant setbacks are proposed
Such setbacks and buffers could be more effectively established on a larger site.
Overall, the proposed use and design will not retain the subject property's rural
character. This is important because one of the purposes of the agricultural zoning
districts is ` ...to permit activities which require non -urban locations and do not
detrimentally impact lands devoted to rural and agricultural activities." Since the site
would not retain its rural character at build -out the existing proposal is not consistent
with the purpose of the agricultural districts
Staff acknowledges that there are other types of special exception uses allowed in
rural areas (e.g. churches, schools, telecommunication towers) that do not necessarily
retain a rural character. Such uses, however, can serve and be used by residents in
the surrounding area and, therefore, can fit in to a rural area. This is especially true
for schools, which are required to locate on major roadways and at the edge of or
November 5, 2002
75
1
•
within the Urban Service Area. In such locations school sites can serve as a transition
between urban and rural areas. The proposed retreat use, however, is a type of use
that cannot fit into a rural area if the retreat project does not retain a rural character
on site.
It is staff's opinion that the proposed use is too intense to be located outside the urban
service area on a parcel of this size. In staff's opinion, the proposed use should either
be located on a much larger site that is further outside the urban service area (in a
remote location) or be located inside the urban service area on commercial acreage as
a lodging, resort, or convention facility use, where the project can be connected to
water, sewer, paved roads, and have fire protection facilities supported by a public
water system.
C. The Board must determine whether or not the application satisfies the general and
specific criteria required for special exception use approval.
Note: The general criteria for special exception uses relate to consistency with the
comprehensive plan and zoning code; compatibility with surrounding land uses;
avoidance of adverse impacts on public health, safety, and the general welfare; and
promotion of an orderly development pattern. It is staff's opinion that a
development of this intensity at this location is not consistent with the rural
characteristics of the Ag -1 land use area. In addition to being too intense for the
subject site, the proposed site plan design spreads out the proposed buildings and
their impacts over a majority of the site in a manner that depreciates the rural
character of the site and introduces an urban type of use against surrounding rural
areas to the north, west, and south.
As proposed, much of the open space on site will be active play fields (southeast
quadrant of the site) or areas that merely separate individual buildings on the site.
Such open space does not retain a rural character. In addition, the project extends a
use with the previously described non -rural characteristics deeper into an agricultural
area. Such an extension blurs the urban service boundary and detracts from an
orderly development pattern.
If the site were to be developed residentially, no more than three separate single-
family parcels could be created. The impact of the proposed development will be
much greater than three single family homes with regard to compatibility and
character of the area.
Although staff acknowledges the admirable social services that the proposed facility
would provide, it is the staff's position that the development is proposed in the wrong
place and on a site too small for the intensity proposed.
18. Specific Land Use Criteria for Retreats and Camps (971.40(11).
The specific criteria for the proposed retreat are addressed as follows:
1. A site plan meeting all of the requirements of Chapter 914, which shows:
a. All building, camping and recreation facilities and areas and distances
to all property boundaries;
b. Location, width, composition and a cross-section of all buffer areas;
November 5, 2002
•
76
Location and number of all camping or sleeping areas (maximum
number of people accommodated for sleeping in permanent
structures) •
d. Drop-off facilities; and
e. A complete description of all planned uses, activities and programs to
occur on site and corresponding hours of operation.
Note: The applicant has provided a site plan and other information which address
the above criteria. The site plan depicts all the proposed improvements with
setbacks, depicts buffer location, depicts location and number of sleeping areas, and
depicts the drop-off facility. Also the applicant has provided a letter (attached)
which describes the planned use activities and programs to occur
2. The site must be located on a minimum of ten (10) acres of property.
Note: The site is located on 15.95 acres of land There are four other "retreats and
camps" facilities in the county These facilities average over 48 acres in size
(Please see attachment # 6 for comparison). These are: Oklawaha Boy Scout Camp
(48.58 acres), Shiloh Youth Ranch (56 acres), Life for Youth Ranch (80 acres), and
Harvest Christian Retreat (10 acres). Therefore the subject site is significantly below
the 48 -acre average, but meets the 10 -acre minimum of this criterion.
3. No building, camping or recreation facility or area may be located closer than
forty (40) feet of any property line, or closer than seventy-five (75) feet to any
property with a residential land use designation, whichever distance is
greater. The referenced seventy -five-foot setback may be reduced to thirty-
five (35) feet if a type B buffer with a six-foot opaque feature is provided_
Note: All proposed structures are greater than 40' from the property line, and all
adjacent property is agriculturally zoned. The setbacks to the respective property
lines are as follows: the closest structure to the east property line is the proposed
office at 50 ; the existing storage building is the closest structure to the north
property line at 60.5'; and the southern most cabin is the closest structure to the west
property line at 90' and the south property line at 115'. While no buffers are
required, the applicant will be preserving existing vegetation along the north and west
property lines This vegetation will serve as a buffer. To the east and south, no
buffers are proposed.
4. The development of permanent structures that accommodate the sleeping of
persons shall be limited as follows: sleeping areas within permanent
structures shall not accommodate more than four (4) persons per acre of the
total project area less area devoted to camping accommodations
Note: The parcel is 15.95 acres in size (15.95 x 4 = 63.8 or 63 campers) which
allows 63 campers for the site. In addition to cabin facilities, 7800 sq. ft. of assembly
building area is proposed.
5. Drop-off facilities may be required by the public works director where such
facilities are deemed necessary to accommodate anticipated traffic operations
on site.
November 5, 2002
77
•
Note: When the cabins are constructed, the loop at the end of the phase II drive will
facilitate the drop-off of campers.
6. Stabilized, unpaved parking and driveway areas may be approved by the
board of county commissioners based upon a positive recommendation from
the public works director.
Note: The applicant has received a determination from the Public Works director
that some of the spaces can be grass, but that the 8 spaces near the dining hall which
are currently proposed as grass, must be paved.
7. Restrictions or limitations on outdoor lighting and location and hours of
operation for outdoor activities may be imposed to mitigate potential adverse
light and noise impacts on surrounding properties.
Note: The applicant has indicated that there will be no outdoor activities that require
lighting.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners make
the following findings.
1. It is empowered under the provisions of Chapter 971 to review the special exceptions applied for;
2. The granting of the special exception will adversely affect the public interest,
3. The application does net satisfy the general criteria required for special exception approval; and
4. The conditions stated below are adequate to ensure compliance with infrastructure and technical
requirements, but are nct adequate to ensure compatibility between the special exception use and
surrounding land uses.
/
Based on these findings, staff recommends that the Bpard of County Commissioners deny the special
exceptimuse request.
If the Board of County Commissioners approves the special exception use request and grants major
site plan approval for Phase I, staff recommends that the following conditions apply:
1. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for phase M-
A. The eastern driveway on 12th Street (construction entrance) shall be removed; and
B. The applicant shall pave 12th Street from the project entrance driveway to the existing
paved portion of 12th Street.
November 5, 2002
78
•
ATTACHMENTS
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Overall Site Plan
4. Phase I Site Plan
5. Letter from Applicant
6. Existing Camps and Retreats Chart
7. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Director Boling responded to questions from the Commissioners in order to clarify
certain points. Chairman Stanbridge expressed concerns about the sewer system's five
phases and Director Boling advised that details will be coming back to the Board but
according to the Environmental Health Department the work can be done satisfactorily.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
John Dean, 2116 27th Avenue, architect of record for the project, distributed a
handout (Handout is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board). He specified that this
project will stand alone and does not need County utilities. He reviewed the photos, area
uses, open space, surrounding properties, and other information in his handout. He noted
this project is planned for a mixed area where transition is happening. He reviewed
information showing that retreats are uniquely different and the Board needs to look at the
personality and how it fits. This small retreat will have only 63 beds This project meets
all of the special exception requirements, but new criteria is now being required. Staff has
required 90% open area, while the Code requires 60%. The project as designed provides
85.6%. He reviewed the goals of the project, the locations of the various buildings, and the
activities that will occur. The cabins will be designed with a rural character.
Mr Dean then reviewed the required setbacks and buffers which were adjusted after
November 5, 2002
79
c1 i
•
receiving the Professional Services Advisory Committee, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, and staff recommendations. He exhibited a new drawing and proposed that
the last 4 cabins be moved next to the other 4. He also proposed moving the administration
building. These changes are being volunteered by the developer and he believed the Board
could add this change at this meeting. There will be Type "C" buffers on 3 sides. He
pointed out that there is a low amount of parking because people will come in by van. There
will be no nighttime activities and no special outdoor lighting is required. The existing
building is set back sixty feet and the applicant will maintain a 150' -setback on all future
buildings The developer is willing to restrict the property to Type "C" buffers on 3 sides.
The eastern driveway will be removed at Phase 3 and they will be willing to specify that.
He felt staff's recommendation for denial is not justified.
The Commissioners questioned Mr. Dean concerning the setback of the existing
house, buffers, and the drainfield.
Commissioner Macht questioned the relationship with their near neighbor, the First
Church of God, and why they cannot have access through that property.
Mr Dean responded that they are neighbors, not tied together; but two distinct
organizations.
Attorney Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Blvd., asked the Board to focus on the real
issue: whether or not it will impact the neighbors. He stressed that retreats are allowed in
rural areas. The density will be only 4 units per acre which is not an intense use. He pointed
out that Life for Youth Ranch has all the areas this project will have. During the summer,
there will be one-week retreats with people coming by van from the airport. The people will
have activities in the community such as Habitat for Humanity. At other times, groups of
10 will learn to teach English to people who live in other countries. There may also be 4 -
day sessions of up to 20 students learning leadership skills. He thought the application
November 5, 2002
80
•
satisfies the Code and the developer wants to be treated under the same rules as others. He
commented that Mr Isleib was lured into purchasing this property believing his plan could
be accomplished at that location.
Jack Isleib, 2265 55th Square, Vero Beach, advised he is the founder of Christian
Outreach International. Mr Isleib described the future activities that would be programed
at the retreat, such as bringing groups here to work with local organizations, and the current
activities being done by the COI which include visiting inmates at the Indian River County
Jail. He stressed that this is not a commercial venture, but a non-profit Christian undertaking
and they need a place to do their work. In the last 3 years, groups averaged 18 people and
the highest was 45. He could not see how the retreat would be a detriment to the
community.
Alex Kromhout spoke for his mother who lives at 6380 12th Street. They object to
this application because of the change from a rural atmosphere, it will bring increased traffic
and people, the impact of sewer facilities, and lack of fire protection. He emphasized that
the agricultural operation of citrus is already under stress in this area. There is a need to
aerially spray the groves and the spray drift could cause a potential lawsuit. He urged the
Board to support the P&Z and staff recommendations. If the Board does approve this
application, he asked that they require the same setback (300 feet) as the First Church of
God.
Louis Schacht, representing Henry and Janet Schacht, 6100 12th Street, respects the
mission to do good, but they want to develop a business effort which is not agricultural. The
proposal is not rural and its green areas are chopped up. It will sleep more people than other
properties off 12th Street and the people there will be exposed to agricultural annoyances
because the Schachts plan to continue operating citrus groves requiring spraying and
herbicide applications as they have for 52 years. The project shows no respect for the Land
November 5, 2002
81
OA
71
•
Use Plan; land use logic and fairness are being challenged. He agreed COI is doing
wonderful work but the site is misplaced; it would be better suited inside the urban service
area or on a larger piece of property. He hoped the Board follows staff's recommendation.
Leon Essex, Stonebridge, is pastor of the Community Church in Fellsmere. When
he moved here five years ago, there were no shopping centers at 58th Avenue and SR 60.
He predicted we are going to continue to see tremendous changes and urged the Board's
favorable vote on this project.
Ken Long, 235 31' Avenue SW, pastor, First Church of God, advised that COI has
been a good neighbor. He was excited about their plan for the property. He believed the
decision for the Board is purely objective and urged that they accept this proposal.
Earl Royder, former employee of COI and elder of First Church of God, advised that
these folks had followed all the requests of staff in good faith at a cost of thousands of
dollars. He asked the Board to approve the application.
Fred Foy Strang, 2716 Laurel Drive, pastor at First Presbyterian Church, advised
he is president of a group that has missions in Africa. He had done a study on teens and
missions and believed this good work will help this community. The area is experiencing
enormous changes; we have to change, look at things differently, and adapt to current needs.
He urged the Board of County Commissioners to approve this special exception.
Gerald Sharp, 409 Oak St., Sebastian, cautioned that spraying needs to be done
carefully so they do not get into liability issues.
Rene Renzi, 340 E Waverly Place, Vero Beach, asked the present location and its
impact on that neighborhood. She also asked if COI is part of an international chain.
Mr. Isleib advised that COI currently has an office in the airport area and they are
using motels to house the people who come to the retreats. This is an independent
organization financed by free-will giving.
November 5, 2002
82
iii
•
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Adams suggested the Board look at this issue to determine if the
Commissioners want to encourage retreats and camps and allow them in all different land
use areas of the County.
Director Keating pointed out that the size needed would not fit in many urban areas.
He made some recommendations for LDR changes, but as to this application, staff is
considering still allowing them in agricultural areas but with more specific criteria. Forty
acres is the minimum recommendation but there are no magic rules or right answers. Staff
looked at a lot of other jurisdictions and found a lot of them do not have regulations for
retreats but deal with them one -by -one. Staff thinks retreats and camps should beresource-
based and it is important to understand that retreats and their uses do not have to be not-for-
profit.
Commissioner Adams expressed concern if they sell the property in the future.
Commissioner Macht thought the number of acres is not the important factor. He
wanted to know the law.
Director Keating read the definitions for special exception uses from Chapter 971.
He advised that staff believes compatibility issues have not been met. Churches are
permitted uses and not special exception uses. Churches serve local people and retreats
bring in people from outside.
Commissioner Macht reminded his colleagues that a judgmental decision had to be
made.
County Attorney Paul Bangel read from the Code concerning special exceptions.
November 5, 2002
83
u
•
Vice Chairman Tippin observed the success of COI in the Czech Republic. He
suggested we need to have more specific detail in the Code on these matters.
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, to grant the special
exception use, approve the conceptual site plan, add the
findings set out in the recommendation as appropriately
amended, and include two criteria staff recommended
concerning special exception approval.
Under discussion, Commissioner Ginn was concerned about the lack of specific
information and setbacks but believed the impact on the community would be a plus, not a
negative.
Chairman Stanbridge asked if the Board approved this and later COI abandoned it,
if it could be a corporate retreat. Director Keating specified that any expansion or buffer
changes would have to come back to the Board for approval.
County Attorney Paul Bangel understood that the motion was to include staff's
conditions 1 a & b and Vice Chairman Tippin affirmed that they were included.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. {The Board made the following findings•
1) it is empowered under the provisions of Chapter 971 to
review the special exceptions applied for; 2) the granting of the
special exception will not adversely affect the public interest; 3)
the application does satisfy the general & specific criteria
required for special exception approval; and 4) the conditions
November 5, 2002
84
12 t
•
stated below are adequate to ensure compliance with
infrastructure and technical requirements and are adequate to
ensure compatibility between the special exception use and
surrounding land uses. Based on these findings and the
conditions that the applicant has volunteered, the Board of
County Commissioners approved the special exception use
request with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase III: A. The eastern
driveway on 12th Street (construction entrance) shall be
removed; and B The applicant shall pave 12th Street from the
project entrance driveway to the existing paved portion of 12th
Street.}
The Chairman called a 5 -minute recess at 12:35 p.m. The meeting was reconvened
at approximately 12:41 p.m. All were present except Commissioner Macht who had to leave
the meeting for another commitment.
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM LINDA &
RON SPICER TO DISCUSS RIVER ISLAND DOCK PERMIT
The Board reviewed an email wherein Mr. Ron Spicer requested to be on the agenda
concerning the River Island dock permit.
Ron Spicer questioned some of the information from his last meeting with the Board
concerning the River Island dock. (See minutes of October 22, 2002, Item 9 B 2) He
questioned the total protrusion being allowed for a moored boat (8.5') and dock (9'), that it
is greater than 25% over the width of the canal (15'). (Clerk's Note: Mr Spicer's drawing
is on file in backup.) Second, he was told by the Code Enforcement office that field
November 5, 2002
85
tel
L
7:.)
(27
•
•
measurements were taken but when he asked for a copy he was told they were not available.
Since his question deals with dock location, he wanted a copy ofthe field measurements and
wanted to know what reference points were used.
Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief Roland DeBlois quoted from the Indian
River County Code Sec. 932.07(3)( b) and (c) concerning the allowable distance of a
projection into a waterway. He pointed out that the first paragraph makes reference to the
structures without mention of a boat at the dock. He explained that 12.5 feet either side of
the centerline applies to the structure. The intent of this section is to make sure when docks
are built, enough of the waterway remains so other boats can get by. Staff's interpretation
of this is that there cannot be a structure within 12.5 feet of the centerline of the waterway.
From a practical standpoint, staff looks at the boat issue, the whole canal, the whole situation
to make sure the waterway can be navigated by other boats. There are not going to be docks
on the other side of the canal, so there is ample passage for navigation. In this instance,
staff's position is that this installation meets both the technical requirements and intent of
the Code. As to the measurements, surveyed measurements were not performed.
Measurements were not written and it was not documented. If the Board feels that staff
should require as -built or that measurements should be depicted on the approved drawing,
staff will take that direction. Staff believes these docks were built in compliance with the
County Code and are in compliance with the permit.
There were no questions and no action required or taken..
•
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM GEORGE
J. RACICOT TO DISCUSS ELECTRIC CODE
Item withdrawn; Building Official Wayne Russ took care of Mr Racicot's concerns.
November 5, 2002
86
a
•
9.B.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST OF NICHOLAS F.
TSAMOUTALES TO DISCUSS WESTCO DEVELOPMENT - RIGHT-
OF-WAY ACQUISITION FRONTING WALGREEN'S AT ROSELAND
ROAD AND US#1
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 2002 and a letter of October 17,
2002:
DATE: October 30, 2002
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P E , Public Works Directo
SUBJECT: Request from Westco Development (Attorney Nicholas F. Tsamoutales) to appear
before Board of County Commissioners on November 5, 2002 regarding Right -of -
Way Acquisition fronting Walgreen's at Roseland Road and US #1
Attached is my letter dated April 29, 2000 to Brian West, Westco Development, regarding right-of-
way acquisition at US #1 /Roseland. Staff has never received a response. Mr. Tsamoutales recently
informed me he would speak to Mr. West regarding this issue, but no correspondence has arrived.
Staff s position, at this time, is that no additional right-of-way is needed since FDOT has abandoned
US #1 six-laning at the request of the City of Sebastian. The pre -application conference on the
Roseland Walgreen's was almost six years ago.
Also attached is a memorandum from then Assistant County Attorney, Terry O'Brien, agreeing to the
contents of the April 19, 2000 letter to Brian West
NICHOLAS F. TSAMOUTALES
GARY B. SACK, OF COUNSEL
November 5, 2002
LAW OFFICES
NICHOLAS F. TSAMOUTALES, R A.
1900 PALM BAY ROAD, NORTHEAST
SUITE G
PALM BAY, FLORIDA 32905-7538
October 17, 2002
VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION 1-772-978-18
87
TELEPHONE (321) 727-1 1 1 1
FACSIMILE (321) 727-1655
i2�
OCT 2002
SDNIWSTRATOR$
Offict
477
Mr. James Chandler
County Administrator
Indian River County
1825 25TH Street
Suite N-158
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Re: Agenda Request - Westco Development
Dear Mr. Chandler:
Please accept this as a formal request to be placed on the November 5,
2002, agenda of the Indian River County Commission meeting.
The issue to be discussed relates to the development of the property
located in the vicinity of the intersection of the Northerly right-of-way of
Roseland Road and the westerly right-of-way of U.S Highway No. 1.
The property was developed in conformance with the requirements of the
Cuun i. The Ccuniy requfrer -ants resulted in the developer designing its
project by setting aside a portion of its property which was to be
purchased by the County to meet its future needs The developer was
bound to adhere to the County's mandates if it desired to develop its
property and therefore set aside the property. However, a dispute over
the issue has now arisen because it appears that a County representative
now suggests that the developer may be incorrect.
Notwithstanding the dispute, in reliance upon the County representa-
tions, requirements and mandates the property was developed to
accommodate the County's requirements and resulted in a loss of
valuable real estate. The developer now seeks compensation for the land
surrendered pursuant to the original understanding and should like to
resolve the matter without litigation.
Please call if you have any questions.
Nicholas F. Tsamoutales
NFT/ rn
cc: Westco Development
November 5, 2002
Nicholas F. Tsamoutales, 1900 Palm Bay Road, attorney representing the property
owner, distributed a handout (written document chronology from January 17, 1997 to April
19, 2000) to each Commissioner (Copy is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board.).
He then stated his client's position and urged the Board to vote to compensate the developer.
Public Works Director James Davis explained his position and stated that the Public
Works Department cannot support purchase of either the US# 1 or Roseland Road property.
Discussion ensued during which time Commissioner Adams spoke of the ethical
standpoint and County Attorney Paul Bangel advised that he had heard nothing from a legal
standpoint that would obligate the County to buy the property but he needed to research
He suggested that Mr. Tsamoutales needs to talk with his office.
Commissioner Ginn recommended taking County Attorney Bangel's suggestion.
County Administrator Chandler called it a difference of opinion advising that
Director Davis suggested in a letter to Mr West that this matter be brought to the Board two
years ago. Former County Attorney Terry O'Brien had reviewed it then and agreed with
Director Davis' position.
After further consideration, it was determined that the County Attorney's office and
Mr. Tsamoutales would discuss this matter and it would come back before the Board in
approximately 30 days or sooner.
Mr Tsamoutales agreed but he asked the Board to approve compensation to his
client. He advised that his client would agree to an amount of $7.50 per square foot, which
is significantly lower than the original offer and falls closer to the figure suggested by
Director Davis.
Commissioner Adams thought Director Davis' figure was about $6.60 per square foot
in 2000, but she thought the attorneys should sit and talk and possibly bring this back to the
Board even sooner than 30 days.
November 5, 2002
89
•
Commissioner Ginn questioned why the County had not heard anything for two years.
Brian West advised that in a telephone conversation, he questioned where Director
Davis had gotten his comparables and had disagreed with those numbers.
There was CONSENSUS that both attorneys should discuss the matter and bring back
something for the Board.
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM
None.
10. TREASURE COAST SPORTS COMMISSION CONCERNING
ORGANIZATION AND SCHEDULING SPORTING EVENTS AT
DODGERTOWN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 2002:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of County Commissioners
James E. Chandler, County Administrator'
October 30, 2002
Treasure Coast Sports Commission Agreement
Attached is the recommended agreement with the Treasure Coast Sports Commission to
serve as a County representative for organizing and scheduling sporting events at Dodgertown.
Section 6.04 of the Facility Agreement with the Dodgers provides for 20 days annually. Of
those days, an allocation of 12 is proposed for Sports Commission events. Prior County approval
of each event is required Appropriate insurance and hold harmless provisions are included
consistent with County Policy and Section 6.04. Sports Commission Executive Director Tom
Colucci concurs with the provisions of the recommended agreement. Dodger Vice President
Craig Callan advised that he has no objection to the proposed arrangement
November 5, 2002
90
1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0 (Commissioner
Macht absent) approved the agreement with Treasure Coast
Sports Commission, Inc. as the County's representative for
organizing and scheduling sporting events at Dodgertown, as
recommended in the memorandum.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.1. HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR SEA TURTLES
ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. - AMENDMENT NO. 1 (3 -YEAR
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 24, 2002:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E
Public Works Direct
FROM: Jonathan C. Gorham, Ph.s.�(�
Coastal Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Ecological Associates Inc.
Contract Amendment No.1
DATE: October 24, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Ecological Associates, Inc. (EAI) serves as the County's consultant
for the development of a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for sea
turtles. The Agreement between the County and EAI was executed on
12 October 1999, and specified acontract period of three years.
The HCP and the accompanying Incidental Take Permit application
have been submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, but some
additional tasks remain in the original Agreement related to
finalizing the HCP. This Amendment No.. 1 would extend the contract
period for an additional three years.
Also included in Amendment No. 1 is a scope of work and cost
proposal for implementing the conservation program specified in the
November 5, 2002
91
it 8
HCP for the initial "start-up" year in the amount of $144,185. It
is anticipated that once the programs and procedures have been
developed, County staff would be able to assume the bulk of program
responsibilities in subsequent years.
RECOHIlMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends the approval of Contract Amendment No. 1 to the
Agreement with Ecological Associates, Inc. A grant from the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Award No.
NA170Z2109) in the amount of $57,102 has been awarded to the
County to fund implementation of the HCP. The balance of $87,083
to be from the Beach Preservation Fund 128-144-572.
ATTACHMENT
Contract Amendment No. 1
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Tippin, to approve staff's
recommendation.
In response to Commissioner Ginn's inquiry, Public Works Director James Davis
confirmed that Indian River County is the principal permit holder.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (4-0, Commissioner Macht absent)
(Contract Amendment No. 1 with Ecological Associates, Inc.
approved. Funding NOAA grant award NA 170Z2109 in the
amount of $57,102; balance of $87,083 from Beach
Preservation Fund.)
AMENDMENT NO. 1 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
November 5, 2002
11.G.2. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN - DIAL CORDY AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. - CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 (BIOLOGICAL
MONITORING OF NEARSHORE REEF ENVIRONMENTS -
SECTORS 1 AND 2)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 25, 2002:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Jonathan C. Gorham, Ph.D.
Coastal Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc.
Contract Amendment No.3
DATE: October 25, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc. is currently under contract with
the county for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment,
required for Federal permitting under the National Environmental
Policy Act, for the Sectors 1&2 beach renourishment project. This
Contract Amendment, in the amount of $.221,000, covers biological
monitoring of nearshore reef environments required by the state and
Federal Permits for the Sectors 1&2 projects.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends the approval of Contract Amendment No. 3 to the
contract with Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc. Funding is from
the Beach Preservation Fund 128-144-572. Costs associated with
biological monitoring for the Sectors 1&2 project are eligible
for cost sharing with the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection on a 75% state/25% local basis under Grant Agreement
98IR1
ATTACK MENT
Contract Amendment No. 3
November 5, 2002
93
reit
UR
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner
Macht absent) approved Contract Amendment No. 3 with Dial
Cordy and Associates, Inc. Funding as recommended in the
above memorandum. (FDEP grant Agreement 981R1 - 75%
state -25% local.)
AMENDMENT NO. 3 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.3. LAWSON, NOBLE & WEBB, INC. - SURVEYING SERVICES
WORK ORDER #1 (ANNUAL SURVEYING AND MAPPING
SERVICES)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.4
Public Works Director
DATE: October 29, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On September 17, 2002, the Board approved work orders for surveying
services with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. and Carter Associates,
Inc., both with offices in Vero Beach. These two firms were the
only local Indian River County firms to submit Letters of Interest.
A third firm, Lawson, Noble, and Webb, Inc. with an office in Port
St. Lucie, was selected. Their office is within 15 miles of Indian
River County. During the Sept. 17, 2002 meeting, the Board
instructed staff to "re -look" at Indian River County firms to
provide surveying and mapping services.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The Public Works Director has met with the attorney's office and
reviewed the CCNA (Competitive Consultants Negotiation Act) adopted
by Florida Statutes. The following procedure was followed in
selecting the three firms:
November 5, 2002
RFP Advertised (Press Journal)
RFP Advertised (Press Journal)
RFP Package due (9 firms submitted)
Short-listed firms (5 firms)
Presentations by Short-listed firms
BCC Approval of Selection of 3 firms
BCC Approval of Annual Agreements
(renewable for 4 years)
BCC Approved WO#1 for Carter &
Kimley-Horn, but denied Lawson, Noble
November 19, 2001
November 26, 2001
December 19, 2001
January 3, 2002
January 22, 2002
February 5, 2002
April 16, 2002
& Webb September 17, 2002
Selection Committee - Chris Kafer, County Engineer
Charlie Cramer, County Surveyor
Gordon Sparks, Environmental Engineer, Utilities Dept.
The St. Lucie County firm, Lawson, Noble, and Webb, Inc. entered
into a contract with the County on April 16, 2002 for surveying
services. They have recently stated that the firm is opening a
local office in Vero Beach for occupancy next month. They
have other jobs in the County to supply local .staff workIn
speaking with the County Attorney's office, In
n has
rendered that there is no grounds to rescindathepApril 16, 2002
contract with Lawson, Noble, and Webb, Inc., since there has not
been "failure to perform duty."
dollars respondi g to the Count h sfRe ehas spst ort several hundred
r Qu
developing the master agreement, andd negotiating WorkaOrderallo. 1.
If the entire CCNA process is re-initiated to consider other lo1.
cal
farms, the existing three survey services contracts may result in
four or more contracts for surveying services. This is a costly
procedure for County staff and consultants.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
It is recommended that the Board approve Work Order No. 1 with
Lawson, Noble, and Webb, Inc. for the 43rd Avenue Right -of Way
project in the amount of $54,370 with the condition that the firm
opens a local office in Indian River County. Funding to be from
10921441-033490.
ATTACHMENT
Work Order No. 1
Sept. 17, 2002 Agenda Item (Memorandum dated Sept. 9, 2002)
November 5, 2002
Commissioner Adams recounted her concern that this firm is not local.
Public Works Director James Davis explained that only two local firms responded
and Lawson, Noble & Webb's contract was approved in February along with the two local
firms. Then the work orders were presented September 17th, and Lawson's work order was
voted down. If the Board had wished to contract with just the locals, it ought to have been
done in February. The Lawson firm has said they will be opening an office in Vero Beach
next month.
County Administrator Chandler added that if the work order is not approved, then the
County would need to rescind the February agreement with Lawson which could cause
problems.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved Work Order No. 1 with
Lawson, Noble, and Webb, Inc. for the 43`d Avenue right-of-
way project in the amount of $54,370 with the condition that
the firm opens a local office in Indian River County, as
recommended in the memorandum.
WORK ORDER NO. 1 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-094 - SEBASTIAN WATER
EXPANSION PHASES III -B AND III -C - RESOLUTION IV - FINAL
ASSESSMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 28, 2002:
November 5, 2002
DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2002
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINIS I'RATOR
FROM: W. ERIK OLSON, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHASTAIN, MGR OF ASSESSMENT PROJE
AND STAFFED BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE'S III -B & III -C
IRC PROJECT Nos. UW -97 -17 -DS & UW -97 -18 -DS
RESOLUTION IV -FINAL ASSESSMENT
RACKGROTIND•
On March 6 2001, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution
III, No. 2001-028, for the preliminary assessment roll on the above -referenced Phase III -B portion of this
project. On July 24, 2001, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved the Phase
III -C portion of these two (2) projects, Resolution III, No 2001-067, and approved combining Phases BI-
B & III -C for bidding and construction purposes. Construction of the project has been completed.
Owners have been notified and connections have begun Staff is requesting the Board's approval of the
final assessment roll.
ANALYSIS:
The preliminary assessment for Phase lII-B was for an estimated cost of $1,335,742.80, which equated
to $0.242354 (rounded) per square foot of property assessed. The revised combined cost estimate for
Phases 1II-B & III -C was $3,285,521.48, which equated to $0.221673 (rounded) per square foot. The fmal
project cost for Phases III -B & 1II-C is in the total amount of $2,099,234.10, which equates to a cost of
$0.141635 (rounded) per square foot. The final total is $0.080038 per square foot or 36.11 % less than the
preliminary cost estimate.
The final cost and summary assessment rolls are attached (Attachment 1). The full assessment roll is on
file in the Commission office
RFCOMMENDATTON•
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve adoption of Resolution IV, which is attached, and authorize the Chairman to execute same.
ATTACHMENT•
Resolution IV & Final Assessment Summary & Roll
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner
Macht absent) adopted Resolution No. 2002-094 certifying "as -
built" costs for installation of water service to the Sebastian
Area, Phases III -B & III -C, in the City of Sebastian, Florida,
and such other construction necessitated by such project;
providing for formal completion date, and date for payment
without penalty and interest.
November 5, 2002
RESOLUTION NO 2002- 094
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT' COSTS FOR INSTALLATION OF
WATER SERVICE TO THE SEBASTIAN AREA, PHASES III -B
& III -C IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AND SUCH
OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH
PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE,
AND DATE FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND
INTEREST.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined that
water improvements for properties located within the area of Phases III -B & III -C of the
Sebastian Water Expansion Area in the City of Sebastian, Florida, are necessary to promote
the public welfare of the county; and
WHEREAS on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, the Board held a public hearing at which time
and place the owners of property to be assessed appeared before the Board to be heard as to
the propriety and advisability of making such improvements and
WHEREAS after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2001-028, which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the
property specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that
resolution; and
WHEREAS the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual "as -built" cost now
that the project has been completed is less than in confirming Resolution No, 2001-028,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. Resolution No. 2001-028 is modified as follows: The due date for the referenced project
and the last day that payment may be made avoiding interest and penalty charges is ninety
days after passage of this resolution.
2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 5.75% per annum may be made in ten annual
installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due date. The due date is the
date of passage of this resolution.
3. The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No. 2001-028 shall be as
shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
4. The assessments, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," shall stand confirmed, and will
remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such
assessments are made until paid.
5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "Al" attached to Resolution No. 2001-028, were
recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall
remain prima facie evidence of its validity.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n , and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
November 5, 2002
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Absent
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 5th
day of November , 2002.
Atter . Barton, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Deputy Clerk
Attachment: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
CLERK'S NOTE FULL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS
ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD.
13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - FDEP APPLICATIONS -
DEADLINE FOR WATER PROJECT APPLICATIONS AND HOUSE
BILL 851
Chairman Stanbridge alerted the Commissioners to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) deadline for water project applications needs to be taken
care of by November 15`h. Also, a community request needs to be prepared for Legislative
Delegation regarding House Bill 851 (water project funding). She commented that requests
on water quality projects are very hot issues and they need to be specific and precise. She
volunteered to prepare the Legislative request along with the applications to FDEP for the
next meeting She hoped both Public Works and Utilities are asking for substantial dollars.
November 5, 2002
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Tippin, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) accepted Chairman Stanbridge's
offer and expressed their thanks.
13.B. TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL - COMMISSIONER
GINN APPOINTED TO SERVE
Vice Chairman Tippin suggested that the Board appoint Commissioner Ginn to serve
as his replacement as chairman of Tourist Development Council since he is retiring from
the Board.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) appointed Commissioner Ginn to
serve as Chairman of the Tourist Development Council.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None.
November 5, 2002
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
Chairman Stanbridge announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board
would reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Fnvironmental Control Board.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 1:37 p.m.
ATTEST:
0
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Minutes approved DEC 1. 0 2002
November 5, 2002