Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2/13/2001
MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2001 - 9:00 A.M. County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman District 5 Ruth M. Stanbridge, Vice Chairman District 2 Fran B. Adams District 1 Kenneth R. Macht District 3 John W. Tippin District 4 James E Chandler, County Administrator Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION Terry Kruse Without Walls International and SHINE — Sharing Hope in Needed Environments 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE James E Chandler 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ADDITIONS: 10. Resolution Setting Year -End Guidelines for Financial Reporting and Payment by County Officers (Constitutionals) 13.D. HUD -Owned Homes for a Dollar Each DEFERRAL 7.W. Request to Modify the Planning Divisions's Fee Schedule for Concurrency Determination Application Fees BACKUP PAGES S. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS None 6. APPROVAL • MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of December 12, 2000 B Regular Meeting spa licti, sbe.r 19, 2000 C. Regular Meeting of 9anuar.y 2, 2001 BK 117PG001 CONSENT AGENDA A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board 1) Indian River Farms Water Control District Audit Report and Annual Local Government Financial Report for Year Ended 09/30/00 2) Indian River County Hospital District Meeting Schedule for 2001 3) I.R. Farms Water Control District Minutes of the Meetings of the Board of Supervisors for Oct., 1999 through September, 2000 4) Fellsmere Water Control District Audit Report and Annual Local Government Financial Report for Year Ended 09/30/00 Library Appreciation Month Proclamation BACKUP PAGES Out -of -County Travel by Commissioners to attend the 2001 Treasure Coast Legislative Conference March 12-14, 2001 in Tallahassee Out -of -County Travel by Commissioner Stanbridge to serve as a Commissioner/Lobbyist during the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the week of March 19-23, 2001 Out -of -County Travel by Commissioner Adams to serve as a Commissioner/Lobbyist during the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the week of April 23-27, 2001 Out -of -County Travel by Commissioners to attend the 2001 Florida Association of Counties (FAC) Annual Conference June 26-29, 2001 in Duval County Blanket Authorization for Commissioners to attend assigned committee meetings out of county (memorandum dated February 1, 2001) Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated January 18, 2001) 10-19 Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated January 25, 2001) 20-29 Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated January 31, 2001) 30-41 BKI17PG002 -3 7. CONSENT AGENDA K. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs (memorandum dated January 22, 2001) L Election of Code Enforcement Board Chairman (memorandum dated January 23, 2001) M. Change Order No. 2 for South County Park Improvements, Phase II (memorandum dated January 24, 2001) N. Assistant County Attorney (memorandum dated February 2, 2001) O. Approval of Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement for Phase VI of Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. Sand Mine (memorandum dated January 31 2001) P. Election of Planning & Zoning Chairman and Vice Chairman (memorandum dated February 6, 2001) Charles Sembler, Tax Collector, approval of Public Official Bond and Invoice (memorandum dated February 6, 2001) R. Federal Annual Certification Report — Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement- Sheriff's Department (letter dated February 7, 2001) S. MACE Grant (Multi -Agency Criminal Enforcement Unit) Project Generated Income — Budget Amendment 009 (memorandum dated January 24, 2001) T Consideration of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2000 MPO Apportionment Plan (memorandum dated February 2, 2001) U. Vero Beach Polo LLC's Request for Final Plat Approval for the Polo Grounds at Pointe West PD (memorandum dated February 2, 2001) Q• V. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 010 (memorandum dated February 7, 2001) BK 117P0003 BACKUP PAGES 42-43 44 45-47 48 49-53 54 55-58 59-62 63-68 69-72 73-79 80-83 ao 4.7 7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): W. Request to Modify the Planning Division's Fee Schedule for Concurrency Determination Application Fees (memorandum dated February 6, 2001) X. Authorization to Accept Invitation and Donation to the County from the Government of the Bahamas for Nathan McCollum to Attend the 5th Annual Bahamas Weather Conference (memorandum dated February 1, 2001) 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. The Oaks of Vero, Inc.'s Request for Planned Develop- ment (PD) Conceptual Plan and Special Exception Use Approval for a 163 Lot Single -Family Subdivision to be known as The Oaks of Vero (Legislative) (memorandum dated January 11, 2001) 2. Approval of Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for We Care of the Treasure Coast, Inc., to Provide Wheelchair and Non -Emergency Medical Stretcher Transportation Services (memorandum dated February 5, 2001) B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS Humane Society (letter dated February 7, 2001) C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS None 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS None BK 117 PG 0014 BACKUP PAGES 84-90 91-97 98-121 122-176 177-187 BACKUP 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS PAGES A. Community Development 1. Consideration of Draft Scope of Services for Consulting Services Request for Proposals: Wireless Master Plan and Telecommunications Regulations Rewrite (memorandum dated January 10, 2001) 188-235 2. Staff Request for Board Authorization to Proceed with Amendment to Land Development Regulations Regard- ing Tree Protection (memorandum dated February 6, 2001) 3. Board Consideration of CRC Development Company's Request to Pave Old Winter Beach Road South of Jungle Trail (tabled from January 23, 2001 Comm. Meeting) (memorandum dated February 6, 2001) 236-249 250-261 4. Report on Affordable Housing Needs and Related Issues (memorandum dated February 7, 2001) 262-285 B. Emergency Services 1. Notice of Ranking of Vendors and Authorization to Negotiate a Contract with PerSe Technologies, Inc., for EMS Ambulance Billing Services (memorandum dated January 22, 2001) 2. Award of Bid for Removal of a Derelict Vessel with Funding from the Derelict Vessel Removal Program Grant Agreement (memorandum dated January 25, 2001) 3. Approval of Resolution Declaring a State of Local Emergency Restricting Non -Permitted Open Burning (memorandum dated February 5, 2001) C. General Services None D. Leisure Services None 286-287 288-291 292-302 E Office of Management and Budget None 61< 1 1 7 PG 005 • 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.) F. Personnel None G. Public Works 1. Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Imrovements to and set Public Hearing date for: 34t Ave., 35th Ave. and Intersecting Streets in Grovenor Estates Subdivision (memorandum dated January 26, 2001) 2. Right -of -Way Acquisition 5th Street SW Improvements Kathryn Karrick Clyatt (memorandum dated January 26, 2001) BACKUP PAGES 303-313 314-320 3. Consultant Selection — Design/Build Services for Improve- ments to The Los Angeles Dodgers Spring Training Facility (memorandum dated January 24, 2001) 321-322 4. Shooting Range — Buildings — Change Order No. 3 (memorandum dated February 1, 2001) 323-326 5. Amendment No. 2 to Professional Service Agreement with Applied Technology and Management for Design and Permitting (memorandum dated January 22, 2001) H. Utilities Sebastian Water Expansion Phase III -B Resolutions I and II (memorandum dated February 5, 2001 I. Human Services None 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY A.. Annual Meeting of Landowners, I.R. Farms Water Control District (memorandum dated February 2, 2001) B. Agreement with Indian River County Fair Association, Inc.; 2001 County Fair (memorandum dated February 7, 2001) 327-364 365-397 398-399 400-404 8K1I7PG©06 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Caroline D. Ginn BACKUP PAGES B. Vice Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge 1. North Barrier Island Re-evaluation 405 2. Jungle Trail Greenway Update 406 3. Lost Tree Island Update 407 C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht E Commissioner John W. Tippin 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS A. Emergency Services District 1. Approval of minutes — meeting of 12/12/00 2. Approval of minutes — meeting of 12/19/00 3. Approval of minutes — meeting of 1/2/01 4. Approval of Renewal of the DocuMed EMS Software Maintenance Agreement (memorandum dated January 18, 2001) 5. Approval of Biomedical Technical Services Agree- ment with Medtronic Physio -Control Corporation (memorandum dated February 1, 2001) BKflPG 007 408-411 412-419 BACKUP 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS PAGES B. Solid Waste Disposal District 1. Approval of minutes — meeting of 12/12/00 2. Approval of minutes — meeting of 12/19/00 3. Solid Waste Disposal District Engineering Services and Permitting Assistance (2001) (memorandum dated January 29, 2001) 420-443 C. Environmental Control Board None 15. ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m. BK 1 1 1 PG 008 INDEX TO MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 2001 1. CALL TO ORDER 1 2. INVOCATION 1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA 1 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 2 6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 2000 2 6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 19, 2000 2 6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 2, 2001 3 7. CONSENT AGENDA 3 7.A. Reports 3 7.B. Proclamation - Library Appreciation Month - February 2001 4 7.C. Out -of -County Travel by Commissioners to Attend the 2001 Treasure Coast Legislative Conference March 12-14, 2001 in Tallahassee 5 7.D. Out -of -County Travel by Vice Chairman Stanbridge to Serve as the Commissioner/Lobbyist During the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the Week of March 19-23, 2001 6 7 E Out -of -County Travel by Commissioner Adams to Serve as a Commissioner/Lobbyist During the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the Week of April 23-27, 2001 8 7.F. Out -of -County Travel by Commissioners to Attend the 2001 Florida Association of Counties (FACo) Annual Conference June 26-29, 2001 in Duval County 10 7.G. Blanket Travel Authorization for Commissioners to Attend Assigned Committee Meetings Out -of -County 11 7.H. Approval of Warrants 12 1 BK I I PG 009 7.I. Approval of Warrants 20 7.J. Approval of Warrants 28 7.K. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs 36 7 L Code Enforcement Board - Election of Chairman Cliff Suthard and Vice Chairman Anthony Gervasio for 2001 38 7.M. South County Park Improvements, Phase II - Barth Construction, Inc. - Change Order No. 2 - Project No. 9624 39 7.N. Assistant County Attorney - Approval to Hire 40 7.0. Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. Sand Mine Phase VI - Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement Approval 41 7.P. Election of Chairman Norman Hensick and Vice Chairman Gene Winne by the Planning and Zoning Commission for 2001 42 7.Q. Charles Sembler, Tax Collector - Public Official Bond and Invoice 42 7.R. Sheriff's Department - Federal Annual Certification Report - Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement 43 7.S. Budget Amendment 009 -MACE Grant (Multi -Agency Criminal Enforcement Unit) Project Generated Income Report 45 7.T. Resolution No 2001-011 - Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2000 Apportionment Plan 46 7.U. Vero Beach Polo LLC - Final Plat Approval for the Polo Grounds at Pointe West PD 50 7.V. Supervisor of Elections - Budget Amendment 010 51 7.W. Modification of Concurrency Determination Application Fee - Planning Division Fee Schedule Revision 53 7.X. Acceptance of Invitation and Donation from the Bahamas Ministry of Tourism for Emergency Management Coordinator Nathan McCollum to Attend Their 5th Annual Bahamas Weather Conference - Grand Bahama Island - March 28 -April 1, 2001 53 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - THE OAKS OF VERO, INC. - REQUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR A 163 -LOT SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS THE OAKS OF VERO 55 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - APPROVAL OF CLASS E CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY - WE CARE OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC., TO PROVIDE WHEELCHAIR AND NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL STRETCHER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 67 9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - PROJECTED RELOCATION COSTS 71 BK 11;PB010 2 10. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-0012 - YEAR-END GUIDELINES FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING AND PAYMENT BY COUNTY OFFICERS (CONSTITUTIONALS) 76 11.A.1. WIRELESS MASTER PLAN & TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS REWRITE - CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 79 11.A.2. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH AMENDMENT TO LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) REGARDING TREE PROTECTION 84 11.A.3. CRC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - REQUEST TO PAVE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD SOUTH OF JUNGLE TRAIL (tabled at January 23, 2001 meeting) 91 11.A.4. REPORT ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS AND RELATED ISSUES 96 11.B.1. RANKING OF VENDORS AND AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH PerSe TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FOR EMS AMBULANCE BILLING SERVICES 115 11.B.2. REMOVAL OF DERELICT VESSEL - MICHAEL J. QUATRARO d/b/a SEBASTIAN TOW BOAT AND SALVAGE - DERELICT VESSEL REMOVAL PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT 118 11 B 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-013 - DECLARING A STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY RESTRICTING NON -PERMITTED OPEN BURNING 119 11.G.1. RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-014 AND 2001-015 - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 34TH AVENUE, 35TH AVENUE, AND INTERSECTING STREETS IN GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION (RESOLUTIONS I AND II) 124 11.G.2. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION CONTRACT - 5TH STREET SW IMPROVEMENTS - KATHRYN KARRICK CLYATT 132 3 BK 117 PG 011 11.G.3. CONSULTANT SELECTION - DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS SPRING TRAINING FACILITY - PROCEED WITH CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH HOK SPORTS FACILITIES GROUP 134 11.G.4. SHOOTING RANGE - BUILDINGS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 - WILLIAM GLOVER, INC. 135 11.G.5. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN AND PERMITTING - AMENDMENT NO. 2 - APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN) 137 11.H. RESOLUTION NOS 2001-016 AND 2001-017 - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -B - RESOLUTIONS I AND II (PROJECT NO. UW -97 -17 -DS) 140 12.A. PROXY DESIGNATION - ANNUAL MEETING OF LANDOWNERS, INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT 146 12.B. 2001 COUNTY FAIR - AGREEMENT WITH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION, INC 147 13.B.1. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - NORTH BARRIER ISLAND RE- EVALUATION 153 13.B.2. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - JUNGLE TRAIL GREENWAY UPDATE 153 13.B.3. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - LOST TREE ISLAND - UPDATE ON RESULTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND CITIZENS APPEARANCE BEFORE GOVERNOR JEB BUSH AND HIS CABINET ON FEBRUARY 6, 2001 154 13.D. COMMISSIONER MACHT - PURCHASE HUD OWNED HOME FOR ONE DOLLAR - 584 5TH STREET SW, VERO BEACH 157 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 160 14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 161 14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD 161 4 BK 117PG0I2 February 13, 2001 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Honda, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, February 13, 2001. Present were Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman; Ruth Stanbridge, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams, Kenneth R. Macht; and John W. Tippin. Also present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. INVOCATION Terry Kruse of Without Walls International and SHINE (Sharing Hope in Needed Environments) delivered the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Administrator Chandler led the Pledge to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Chairman Ginn announced the following additions: item 10, a Resolution Setting Year -End Guidelines for Financial Reporting and Payment by County Officers (Constitutional Officers) and item 13 D, HUD New Dollar Homes Initiative. Chairman Ginn February 13, 2001 1 BK117PG013 also announced the deferral of item 7.W., Request to Modify the Planning Division's Fee Schedule for Concurrency Determination Application Fees. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously made the above changes to the agenda. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. 6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 2000 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 12, 2000. There were none. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 12, 2000, as written and distributed. 6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 19, 2000 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 19, 2000. There were none. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 19, 2000, as written and distributed. February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 PG 01 4 2 6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 2, 2001 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 2, 2001. There were none. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 2, 2001, as written and distributed. 7. CONSENT AGENDA 7.A. Reports Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board Indian River Farms Water Control District Audit Report and Annual Local Government Financial Report for Year Ended 09/30/00. Indian River County Hospital District Meeting Schedule for 2001. Indian River Farms Water Control District Minutes of the Meetings of the Board of Supervisors for October 1999 through September 2000 Fellsmere Water Control District Audit Report and Annual Local Government Financial Report for Year Ended 09/30/00 February 13, 2001 3 BK I I7 PG 0I5 7.B. Proclamation - Library Appreciation Month - February 2001 The Board entered the following proclamation on the record: 1 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2001 AS LIBRARY APPRECIATION MONTH WHEREAS, the Friends and Trustees Interest Section of the Florida Library Association is sponsoring statewide recognition supporting appreciation for all libranes within the State of Florida, including public, private, academic, special, county and regional libraries; and WHEREAS, libraries are a cornerstone of Florida's educational system, providing programs for children families, adults and elders to enrich their understanding of the world; and WHEREAS, the expansion of electronic networks linking libraries and their resources makes possible more easily accessible information for library users in Florida; and WHEREAS, libraries provide residents of Florida entry to important research about health, economics the environment and countless other subjects to support better living conditions and to help our residents live more productive and fulfilling lives; and WHEREAS, libraries support a competitive workforce with basic literacy programs, computers and other resources to help people learn to find, evaluate and use information they need for their jobs, health and recreational needs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners that the month of February 2001, be designated as LIBRARY APPRECIATION MONTH in Indian River County, and recognizes the importance of libraries in all of our lives. Adopted this 13th day of February 2001. C tt't'•4•.. i• . • 1 41. °..• . ••_ 41/1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Caroline D. Ginn, Chairrn February 13, 2001 BK 117PG016 4 7. C Out -of -County Travel by Commissioners to Attend the 2001 Treasure Coast Legislative Conference March 12-14, 2001 in Tallahassee The Board reviewed the information concerning the conference as follows• 2001 Treasure Coast Legislative Conference P.O. Box 2947 Vero Beach, FL 32961 Reserve the dates - March 12 - 14 2001 The annual Treasure Coast Legislative Conference is the most productive way to address the crucial issues our area is facing as our economy and population grow. Our new Legislative Delegation urgently needs to talk with you, the business and community leaders, and we need to talk with each other on a legislative level about the future of the Treasure Coast. There Is no time to lose. Reserve the dates and Join us In Tallahassee! For more information: Indian River County St. Lucie County Stuart/Martin County 561-567-3491 561-595-9999 561-287-1088 RECEIVED JAN - 8 2001 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION Carolynn Ginn/IR County Commissioner 1840 25th St Vero Beach, FL 32960 2001 Treasure Coast Legislative Conference March 12-14 in Tallahasee Functions will take place at the DoubleTree Hotel unless otherwise noted. Mon. 3/12 Tues. W13 Wed. 3/14 3-5p.m. 6:00 p.m. 7:30 a.m. 9:00 a.m. 10-5 12 Noon 5:30 - 7:30 pm. 8:00 a.m. UUI.K P.0.1E U.S. P0614GE PAIS VERO BEACH, FL PZRMII No. 104 uISTRIBUTION LIST (ommistioners,0a.,f Administrator Attorney__T Personnel Public Works (ommu,,lr Der IJlilities inure 01118 Emery Ser' Risk Mgt Other_'Awn° Registration in Lobby Welcome Gathering d Partiapards at Andrew's Capitol Grill Breakfast with Legislative Delegation Briefing of Legislative Business Issues Meetings on the Hill on you own Optional Luncheon Legislative Reception, 22nd Floor, Capitol Building Wrap-up Breakfast Conference Few: $180 per participard; 5160 before Feb. 16; Spouse 8100. Optional lunch $20. Includes all conference materials, two receptions and two brealdasts. AccomodatIons: DoubleTree Hotel, 101 So. Adams Street, within walking distance of the Capitol. Ideatathitamacesag Legislative Cord. when making reservations Phone: 850-224-5000. Rates: $129 double or single. Travel: On you own. r Please make reservations for Name(s): Company: Address: Visa/MC: Cardholder's Name: Fax: City/State/bp: Expiration Date: Signature: indien River County Chamber of commerce, P.O. Box 2947, Vero Beech, FL 32961 Fax: 641-7793191 Phone February 13, 2001 5 0 BK 117PG017 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved out -of - county travel for the Commissioners to attend the 2001 Treasure Coast Legislative Conference March 12-14, 2001 in Tallahassee, as requested. 7.D. Out -of -County Travel by Vice Chairman Stanbridge to Serve as the Commissioner/Lobbyist During the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the Week of March 19-23, 2001 The Board reviewed a letter of January 26, 2001: >.5w�■ FLOR"- c js ASSOC/AT 'rd's,11 !a of COUNe sS January 26, 2001 The Honorable Ruth M. Stanbridge Indian River County Commission 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Flonda 32960 Dear Commissioner Stanbndge: P.O. Box 549/Tallahassee, Florida 32302 Phone: 850/922-4300 Suncom: 292-4300 FAX: 850/488-750 Website: wwee. 11-counlies.com 01STRIBU T IOU LI RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2001 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION Commissioner; G Aomtcistrotcd Attorney Personnel Public Work; Coar'riilr Der li1i1 es Finance OMB [mere. S•rr Thank you for agreeing to serve as a Commissioner/Lobbyist during the 2001 ^'sk Mgi Legislative Session. We appreciate your willingness to volunteer to be a voice oriefhietentif 'Hill". Your presence is crucial given the number of Important county issues coming fuel 7 before the Flonda Legislature this session — Article V Court Funding, Election Reform, Elder Care / Long Temi Care Services, Growth Management Reform and Telecommunication Tax Reform are dust a few. FAC has made a concerted effort to organize commissioner teams dunng each week of the session. Based on scheduling needs and the response you provided you have been assigned the following day(s) to lobby in Leon County/Tallahassee: February 13, 2001 BK 11 PG 018 Week of: March 19-23 6 Please notify Paula Roberts, Program Coordinator, at the FAC office if you would like additional times assigned to you. By participating in this program, you are responsible for arranging appointments with legislators andfor state agency officials, cost of transportation, lodging, and meals. For your convenience, FAC has reserved rooms for each week tnrough session at the Double Tree Hotel located at 101 South Adams Street Oust down the block from the FAC office). The room rate will be $119 per night. You may make your reservations by calling (850)224-5000. You will need a credit card and the following to reserve your room at the given rate: confirmation number: 213077 Individual reservations must be canceled up to 72 hours prior to 4:00 p.m. on the date of arrival to avoid penalty of first night's room and tax. Enclosed is an itinerary form to assist with your travel plans and legislative activities. Please fax your travel plans and appointment schedule to Ms. Roberts at (850)488-7192 one week-pnor to your arrival This is to allow FAC to cancel any hotel rooms that have not been reserved and to better prepare for your visit. A week prior td your arrival a preliminary legislative calendar for the Florida House of Representatives and Florida Senate may be found on the Internet at www.leq.state fl us. We will also fax you a legislative agenda the Thursday prior to the week you will be participating. Please be sure to schedule time upon your arrival to meet with Carol Bracy so she may brief you on the week's events If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Paula Roberts or myself at (850)922-4300. • Again, thank you for your commitment to this important initiative. Sincerely, Csio-IL.(\ctsui Carol L. Bracy Carol L. Bracy Legislative Director Enclosure cc: County Lobbyist February 13, 2001 7 Bf41f7PG0I9 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved out -of - county travel by Vice Chairman Stanbridge to serve as the Commissioner/Lobbyist during the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the week of March 19-23, 2001, as requested. 7.E. Out -of -County Travel by Commissioner Adams to Serve as a Commissioner/Lobbyist During the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the Week of April 23-27, 2001 The Board reviewed a letter of January 26, 2001: lamas Ns FLORt oa ASSOCIATof t; P.O. Box 549/Tallahassee, Florida 32302 COUN77 Phone: 850/922-4300 Suncom: 192-4300 FAX: 850/488.-70 7 ngs Website: www.fl-counties.com DISTRIBUTION LIQ (ommisron.r: - A minis;rotor Attorney Personoet Public Woris Cornua;;, Deb uti5hes hrsr!= OMB_ Emerc S _ Risk Mgt Thank you for agreeing to serve as a Commissioner/Lobbyist during the 2001 0 '�T'"�''_- Legislative Session. We appreciate your willingness to volunteer to be a voice on the 7 'Hill". Your presence is crucial given the number of important county issues coming - before the Honda Legislature this session — Article V Court Funding, Election Reform, Elder Care / Long Term Care Services, Growth Management Reform and Telecommunication Tax Reform are just a few. FAC has made a concerted effort to organize commissioner teams during each week of the session. Based on scheduling needs and the response you provided you have been assigned the following day(s) to lobby in Leon County/Tallahassee: allahassee: January 26, 2001 RECEIVED The Honorable Fran Adams JAN 2 9 200 Indian River County Commission 184025th Street BOARD OF COUNTY Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COMMISSION Dear Commissioner Adams, Week of: April 23-27 February 13, 2001 BK 111PG020 8 a. Please notify Paula Roberts, Program Coordinator, at the FAC office if you would like additional times assigned to you. By participating in this program, you are responsible for arranging appointments with legislators andfor state agency officials, cost of transportation, lodging, and meals. For your convenience, FAC has reserved rooms for each week through session at the Double Tree Hotel located at 101 South Adams Street (just down the block from the FAC office). The room rate will be $119 per night. You may make your reservations by calling (850)224-5000. You will need a credit card and the following to reserve your room at the given rate: confirmation number: 213088 Individual reservations must be canceled up to 72 hours prior to 4:00 p.m. on the date of arrival to avoid penalty of first night's room and tax. Enclosed is an itinerary form to assist with your travel plans and legislative activities. Please fax your travel plans and appointment schedule to Ms. Roberts at (850)488-7192 one week prior to your arrival This is to allow FAC to cancel any hotel rooms that have not been reserved and to better prepare for your visit. A week prior to your arrival a preliminary legislative calendar for the Florida House of Representatives and Florida Senate may be found on the Internet at www.Ieq.state fl us. We will also fax you a legislative agenda the Thursday pnor to the week you will be participating. Please be sure to schedule time upon your arrival to meet with Carol Bracy so she may brief you on the week's events. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Paula Roberts or myself at (850)922-4300. • Again, thank you for your commitment to this important initiative. Sincerely, n, p Carol L. Bracy 6cui Legislative Director ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved out -of - county travel for Commissioner Adams to serve as a Commissioner/Lobbyist during the 2001 Legislative Session in Tallahassee the week of April 23-27, 2001, as requested. February 13, 2001 9 BK 117PG021 7.F. Out -of -County Travel by Commissioners to Attend the 2001 Florida Association of Counties (FACo) Annual Conference June 26- 29, 2001 in Duval County The Board reviewed a letter of January 2, 2001: FLORIDA ASSOCIATION of COUNTIES P.O. Box 549/Tallahassee, Florida 32302 Phone: 850/922-4300 Suncom: 292-4100 FAX: 850/488 Website: www.11-counhes.com MEMORANDUM RECEIVED TO: FROM: County Commissioners County Administrators County Attorneys ,,a;; -8 c,4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION Mary Kay Cariseo, Executive Director Jill Jackson, Meeting Planner DATE: January 2, 2001 RE: 2001 FAC Annual Conference Hotel Information DISTRIBUTION LIST r Cimmiss ones Otte .4 Al Lett Jmimstrator inane; Po•-rvgpl Public Werks Community Dev i•ironce 'SME z.nerg. Sery Tisk Mgt her llO.�r�Xi i The Florida Association of Counties will be holding its 72nd Annual Conference June 26-29, 2001 in Duval County. We would like for our membership to have advance notice of the conference hotel information to help accommodate everyone wishing to stay at the conference hotel In addition, having these dates in advance, we are hopeful that counties will schedule their Board meetings around the FAC Annual Conference to allow for greater participation. The Adam's Mark Hotel in Duval County, which is scheduled to open in February 2001, will be the site for this year's conference. The negotiated room rate for our conference is $114.00 SID, plus 12.5% tax. All room reservations can be made by calling the Adam's Mark at (866) 444 -ADAM. You must state you are attending the FAC Annual Conference to receive this rate. The cut-off date for the FAC negotiated room rate is May 29, 2001 Reservation requests must be guaranteed by check, money order, or valid major credit card number equal to one (1) night's room rate, plus applicable tax. Upon receipt, this deposit will be applied to the first night's stay. Deposits are refundable if notice of cancellation is received by the Adam's Mark at least 48 hours prior to the date of your arrival Please note that the hotel WILL NOT be opening up the room block until January 15. 2001 for reservations. Please mark your calendars for this date We wanted to give the county family this information first and apologize for any inconvenience you may have had with hotel reservations in previous years. Please contact Jill Jackson, FAC Meeting Planner, at 850/922-4300 if you have any questions or problems. We look forward to another outstanding conference' February 13, 2001 BK 1 17 PG 022 10 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved out -of - county travel by Commissioners to attend the 2001 Florida Association of Counties (FACo) Annual Conference June 26-29, 2001 in Duval County, as requested. 7. G. Blanket Travel Authorization for Commissioners to Attend Assigned Committee Meetings Out -of -County The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 1, 2001: To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: February 1, 2001 Subject: BLANKET AUTHORIZATION FOR COMMISSIONERS TO ATTEND ASSIGNED COMMITTEE MEETINGS OUT OF COUNTY m From. Kimberly E Massung ir Executive Aide Description of Condition It is a requirement by the County auditor to include the date the Board approved out of county travel on the travel advance and voucher forms when submitting reimbursement from the Board of County Commissioners for travel. Presently all Commissioners sit on committees where out of county travel is required for assigned committee meetings (i.e. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council meets in Stuart once a month). For the purpose of complying with the auditor's requirement of having an approval date on the travel voucher and advance forms, I would like approval to use today's date when submitting reimbursement requests for the Board members out of county assigned committee meeting travel. Recommendation Approval be granted for out of county travel for all current and any future assigned committee meetings Board members are required to attend. February 13, 2001 11 B1( 117PG023 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved all out - of -county travel for all current and any future assigned committee meetings the Commissioners are required to attend, as requested. 7.H. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 18, 2001: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JANUARY 18, 2001 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of January 15, 2001 to January 18, 2001. Attachment: ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period January 15-18, 2001, as requested. February 13, 2001 BK I I7 PG ©24 12 CHECK NAME NUMBER O 020964 0020965 O 020966 0020967 0020968 O 020969 O 020970 O 020971 0020972 0020973 0020974 0020975 O 020976 0020977 0020978 0020979 O 020980 O 020981 O 020962 O 020983 O 020984 O 020985 O 020986 O 020987 O 295837 O 295838 0295839 0295840 O 295841 0295842 0295843 O 295844 O 295845 O 295846 O 295847 0295848 O 295849 O 295850 O 295851 O 295852 0295853 0295854 O 295855 O 295856 O 295857 O 295858 0295859 O 295860 O 295861 0295862 0295863 0295864 O 295865 0295866 O 295867 0295868 0295869 February 13, 2001 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR WI SCTF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IRS - ACS CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT NACO/SOUTHEAST SALEM TRUST COMPANY WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE FL SDU TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION ALBERTSONS SOUTHCO *4357 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP ALPHA ACE HARDWARE AMERICAN WATER WORKS ATCO TOOL SUPPLY AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, ATLANTIC REPORTING ABS PUMPS, INC AQUAGENIX ARMSTRONG MEDICAL INDUSTRIES ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING ASSOCIATION OF STATE ADVANCED MEDICAL & AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT'L A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES A T & T ASHWORTH INC ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES ALTERATIONS ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP ALAN DALE WILLIAMS TRACTOR ASSOCIATES, THE AMERICAN COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC ATLANTIC PSYCHIATRIC CENTER ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT 13 CHECK DATE 2001-01-15 2001-01-15 2001-01-15 2001-01-15 2001-01-15 2001-01-15 2001-01-15 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-17 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 CHECK AMOUNT 3,997.76 20,037.50 191.70 4,299.14 2,154.30 464.40 9,505.16 138.50 115.38 150.00 181.00 331.62 50.00 664.73 2,500.00 79,716.76 213.83 8,871.07 477.40 23.08 132.46 7,880.45 4,038.41 1,696.17 69.00 820.15 235.61 1,629.44 74.19 109.00 77.05 1,712.14 87.25 10,430.31 461.00 1,970.77 87.00 46.00 185.00 664.75 294.33 90.43 39.09 58.00 51.06 1,113.99 147.25 857.69 32.50 58.00 1,160.00 7,310.16 867.00 50.00 22.80 45.00 18,662.25 BK HPG025 CHECK NUMBER 0295870 0295871 0295872 0295873 O 295874 O 295875 0295876 O 295877 O 295878 O 295879 O 295880 O 295881 O 295882 O 295883 0295884 O 295885 O 295886 0295887 0295888 0295889 O 295890 0295891 0295892 O 295893 O 295894 O 295895 O 295896 O 295897 O 295898 O 295899 O 295900 O 295901 O 295902 0295903 O 295904 O 295905 O 295906 0295907 0295908 0295909 0295910 0295911 0295912 0295913 0295914 0295915 0295916 0295917 0295918 O 295919 0295920 0295921 O 295922 O 295923 O 295924 O 295925 O 295926 O 295927 O 295928 NAME ATLANTIC PETRO/ENVIRO BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK BENSONS LOCK SERVICE BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION BAKER & TAYLOR INC BRODART CO BOWKER B IRELEY'S ELECTRIC BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION BREVARD BOILER CO BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC B FI WASTE SYSTEMS BOOKS ON TAPE INC BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT BELLSOUTH MOBILITY BELLSOUTH BEAZER HOMES, INC BOBCAT OF ORLANDO BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF BARKETT, ERIC C BIOMASS PROCESSING BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING BARTH, ALLYSON BELLSOUTH CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC CORBIN, SHIRLEY E CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING CLINIC PHARMACY CLARKE, DOROTHEA CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY CINDY'S PET CENTER, INC CLEANNET USA C 0 R E PROGRAM COWBOY PLASTICS CHARTS, INC CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP CLIFFORD, MIKE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF COLUMBIA HOUSE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS CITGO PETROLEUM CORP CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT CLARK, DEXTER CALLAWAY GOLF BALL CO CALIFF, BEVERLY K COASTAL DOORS INC CAL BUILDERS, INC DAILY COURIER SERVICE DELTA SUPPLY CO DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC February 13, 2001 BK I f 7 , 026 14 CHECK DATE 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 CHECK AMOUNT 775.04 2,025.50 57.50 37,248.83 90.81 2,000.00 1,555.20 4,448.92 3,195.00 1,358.33 115.94 1,404.02 27.55 199.74 144.00 17.96 720.38 5,128.07 500.00 37.58 37,242.55 175.00 109,006.84 850.00 78.38 1,952.47 476.53 21,658.92 265.00 198.00 525.00 679.00 190.54 8,802.66 64.71 31.32 892.36 174.73 20,537.72 110.00 173.12 209.99 819.44 100.00 61.75 199.50 68.84 20.57 290.33 3,908.02 9.00 233.00 209.77 300.00 205.00 84.04 847.00 89.67 171.86 CHECK NUMBER O 295929 O 295930 O 295931 O 295932 O 295933 O 295934 O 295935 O 295936 O 295937 0295938 0295939 0295940 O 295941 O 295942 O 295943 O 295944 O 295945 O 295946 O 295947 O 295948 O 295949 O 295950 0295951 0295952 O 295953 0295954 0295955 0295956 0295957 0295958 O 295959 0295960 O 295961 0295962 0295963 0295964 0295965 0295966 0295967 0295968 O 295969 0295970 O 295971 O 295972 O 295973 O 295974 0295975 O 295976 O 295977 O 295978 O 295979 O 295980 O 295981 0295982 0295983 0295984 O 295985 0295986 NAME DOCTORS' CLINIC DUVAL FORD DATA SUPPLIES, INC FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF DAVIDSON TITLES, INC FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF DELTA ORLANDO RESORT DESIGN CABINET OF VERO BEACH, DEPT OF BUSINESS & DADE PAPER COMPANY DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC DOCTORS' CLINIC DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIR E IRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC DEAN, RINGERS, MORGAN AND E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC E G P, INC E BSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES E G P INC ELPEX, INC EMED CO, INC ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC ENCORE BROADCAST EQUIPMENT EAST COAST ORTHOTICS INC FEDEX FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLORIDA COUNCIL ON CRIME FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO FLORIDA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FLORIDA WATER RESOURCES FOOTJOY FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC FLORIDA STATE ARCHIVES FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE FLORIDAFFINITY, INC FENIMORE, CHARLES FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE FLORIDA GAME & FISH COMMISSION F & W PUBLICATIONS INC FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE FLORIDA HEALTHY KIDS CORP FLORIDA HIKER MAGAZINE GATEWAY COMPANIES, INC GALE GROUP, THE GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC GOVERNMENT FINANCE GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC GOLDEN, ROBERT February 13, 2001 15 CHECK DATE 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 CHECK AMOUNT 73.34 21,943.00 182.79 500.00 2,165.65 500.00 225.00 172.00 1,880.00 5,234.22 559.15 87.80 1,065.00 5,526.60 40.78 269.00 8,928.61 112.25 155.92 21,741.98 49.00 425.00 127.95 327.18 2,915.50 18.40 1,040.64 223.12 8.99 20.00 500.00 266.05 225.00 22,061.81 131.40 9.62 204.42 4,806.23 4,940.00 60.00 100.00 28.97 5,168.00 315.00 15.00 16.97 64.28 615.60 800.44 2,083.33 23.50 3,058.00 2,016.28 220.39 601.92 275.00 1,634.19 87.29 BK 117PG027 CHECK NUMBER O 295987 O 295988 O 295989 O 295990 O 295991 0295992 O 295993 O 295994 O 295995 O 295996 O 295997 0295998 O 295999 O 296000 0296001 O 296002 NAME G K ENVIRONMENTAL, INC GOLF AROUND THE WORLD, INC HAMMOND & SMITH, P A HARRIS SANITATION, INC HARRISON UNIFORMS HICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES HERITAGE QUEST HELD, PATRICIA BARGO HACH COMPANY HARRIS SANITATION, INC HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER HOLIDAY BUILDERS HOLSHOUSER, MICHAEL S. HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE O 296003 HILTON JACKSONVILLE RIVERFRONT 0296004 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID 0296005 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 0296006 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC O 296007 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC O 296008 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 0296009 INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER O 296010 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL O 296011 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC 0296012 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 0296013 IBM CORPORATION O 296014 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 0296015 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE - O 296016 IMI -NET, INC O 296017 INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY,INC O 296018 INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS 0296019 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT O 296020 INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST O 296021 JAMES PUBLISHING, INC O 296022 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA O 296023 JAFFE, ROBERT F, ES 0296024 JEFFERSON. CHRISTOPHER A O 296025 JUDAH, HUSTON 0296026 JONES CHEMICALS, INC O 296027 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC O 296028 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING O 296029 0296030 0296031 O 296032 O 296033 O 296034 0296035 O 296036 O 296037 O 296038 O 296039 O 296040 O 296041 O 296042 0296043 O 296044 0296045 0296046 O 296047 KOMARNICKI, WALTER KRUGER, INC KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC LAWMEN & SHOOTERS SUPPLY LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. L IGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS L J RUFFIN & ASSOC LEXIS LAW PUBLISHING LUNA, JORGE LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES LUNA, JUVENAL LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAUREL HOMES, INC LOHMAN, SCOTT MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP MCDONOUGH, WAYNE R ESQ February 13, 2001 BIS I I 7 , 028 16 CHECK DATE -2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 CHECK AMOUNT 892.50 291.65 10,450.00 523.38 243.30 1,281.44 132.80 53.96 150.50 571.65 61,481.11 109.50 24.00 500.00 154.00 7,681.18 327.00 13,188.83 75.00 1,462.20 120.00 549.84 2,076.00 6,295.02 516.28 50.35 970.17 2,157.32 225,612.20 450.00 40.00 350.00 8.06 23,465.48 191.88 1,403.24 50.00 135.00 69.52 2,704.67 1,230.75 50.00 255.00 100,000.00 1,140.00 3.24 129.50 7,200.00 1,695.51 989.98 1,207.00 106.64 90.12 211.80 141.622 1,000.0^. 49.00 460.00 64.42 3,541.89 1,238.45 CHECK NUMBER 0296048 O 296049 O 296050 O 296051 0296052 NAME MIKES GARAGE MYRON L COMPANY MAGANA, IGNACIO M D MASTELLER, MOLER & REED, INC MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC 0296053 MDS MATRX 0296054 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 0296055 MORNINGSTAR, INC 0296056 MERCURY TECHNOLOGIES O 296057 M & R SPORTSWEAR O 296058 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE O 296059 MARC INDUSTRIES O 296060 MEDCHECK O 296061 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC O 296062 MOSS, ROGER O 296063 MEZZINA, PATRICIA O 296064 MITCHELL TRAINING, INC 0296065 MARTIN, CRISTI 0296066 MONTERO, FINIZIO, VELASQUEZ, O 296067 MODERN ROOFING SYSTEMS O 296068 MELBOURNE INTERNAL MEDICINE O 296069 MCMANUS BOOKS O 296070 M LEE SMITH O 296071 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION O 296072 NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITER, INC O 296073 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO 0296074 N A D A APPRAISAL GUIDES 0296075 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS O 296076 NENA 0296077 NU CO 2, INC 0296078 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE O 296079 O 296080 O 296081 O 296082 O 296083 0296084 O 296085 O 296086 O 296087 0296088 O 296089 O 296090 0296091 0296092 0296093 O 296094 O 296095 0296096 0296097 0296098 0296099 0296100 0296101 0296102 0296103 0296104 0296105 0296106 February 13, 2001 OMNIGRAPHICS, INC OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS ORION RESEARCH, INC OFFICE DEPOT, INC OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC PEPSI -COLA COMPANY POSTMASTER PETTY CASH P B S VIDEO PORT CONSOLIDATED PARKS RENTAL PAGE, LIVINGSTON PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION PARKER, DEBBIE PROSPER, JANET C PENA, JORGE PIERCE, STEPHEN A & CARLENE W QUALITY BOOKS, INC QUAIL VALLEY CLUB, LLC RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICES RINGHAVER ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC RIORDAN, MICHAEL C PSY.D. R & G SOD FARMS RAPP, PAMELA REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 17 CHECK DATE 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 CHECK AMOUNT 270.00 42.21 29.00 4,180.00 425.25 290.38 344.47 4,929.00 481.24 70.94 363.77 103.62 1,063.45 1,000.00 15.45 963.22 2,400.00 612.50 15,000.00 2,500.00 57.00 48.20 177.00 191.45 149.50 23.70 90.00 634.56 750.00 107.22 349.63 281.95 72.41 346.48 4.68 5,800.00 253.27 110.00 125.00 10.69 256.24 807.39 450.94 45.00 72.00 177.67 157.50 136.47 55.45 20,335.07 30.00 150.00 1,546.41 6,040.77 46,823.54 750.00 85.00 24.00 409.85 BK 117 029 CHECK NUMBER O 296107 0296108 O 296109 0296110 0296111 0296112 0296113 O 296114 O 296115 0296116 O 296117 0296118 O 296119 S 0296120 S 0296121 0296122 O 296123 O 296124 0296125 O 296126 O 296127 O 296128 O 296129 O 296130 O 296131 O 296132 O 296133 O 296134 NAME ROMERO, BARBARA RIVERSIDE LEASING CO ROYAL, SHARON ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET ROSENDAHL, KRISTINE RODNEY HALL, HOUSE MOVING INC RETROFLORIDA INC SAFETY KLEEN CORP SCHLITT INSURANCE SERVICES INC SECURITY TITLE OF INDIAN SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, OUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY NELL, RICK SUN TELEPHONE, INC SAFESPACE INC SEMBLER, CHARLES W SEBASTIAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL SHEPARD'S SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC SALEM PRESS, INC SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC SOUTH FLORIDA TRANE STARCK, DONNA SNOBERGER, RUTH ANN SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY/INC O 296135 S 0296136 SE 0296137 S 0296138 SO 0296139 SO 0296140 SA 0296141 SE 0296142 SE 0296143 ST 0296144 SP 0296145 SM 0296146 SI 0296147 SHE O 296148 SEB 0296149 S O 296150 T O 296151 0296152 O 296153 O 296154 0296155 0296156 O 296157 0296158 O 296159 0296160 O 296161 0296162 AFETY KLEEN CORP BASTIAN RIVER HIGH SCHOOL T M COMPANY UTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO UTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF VE THE MANATEE CLUB ELEY, SANDRA MINOLE OF OKEECHOBEE/JUPITER JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST EIRS, DONNA ITH, JIM MONS, TIFFANY RATON SAFARI HOTEL ASTIAN POWER CENTER RENTAL AMARITAN CENTER ARMAC AMERICA INC TEN TIT TRI TRE TEXA TEMP THOM TREA TIPP THO TRUG T C 0296163 T A O 296164 TREA O 296165 THYS O 296166 TREA -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC LEIST -SURE CORPORATION ASURE COAST REFUSE CORP CO CREDIT CARD CENTER ACO OF TREASURE COAST SON FINANICAL PUBLICATION SURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC IN, JOHN W MAS T BEELER, PUBLISHER REEN CHEMLAWN B ILLING CORPORATION P SOD S URE COAST NEWSPAPERS SEN MIAMI ELEVATOR SURE COAST SPORTS February 13, 2001 6X 1 17 pec 030 18 CHECK DATE 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-0118 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 CHECK AMOUNT 42.00 614.00 558.40 29.87 25.81 5,000.00 24.95 118.50 1,527.00 20.56 173.36 116.40 22.16 51.50 87.50 6,000.02 610.20 24.00 1,183.96 7,997.77 1,677.90 875.00 1,625.76 1,142.82 2,968.75 5.22 157.63 103.69 462.09 1,000.00 44.00 42.91 160.00 37.90 32.10 55.00 2,000.00 381.50 500.00 136.50 210.00 41.99 5,465.10 8,536.35 7,312.79 2,463.48 353,793.00 40,679.21 3,516.38 123.22 434.00 244,495.02 25.52 45.75 45.00 10,345.47 21,396.00 323.19 1,958.00 2,397.43 CHECK NUMBER O 296167 O 296168 O 296169 O 296170 O 296171 O 296172 O 296173 O 296174 O 296175 O 296176 O 296177 O 296178 0296179 O 296180 0296181 0296182 0296183 0296184 0296185 O 296186 O 296187 0296188 O 296189 0296190 0296191 0296192 0296193 0296194 0296195 0296196 0296197 0296198 O 296199 0296200 O 296201 0296202 0296203 0296204 0296205 0296206 0296207 0296208 0296209 0296210 O 296211 O 296212 0296213 0296214 NAME TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL TILLIS, BRYANT E PAMELA R UNITED STATES GOLF ASSOC ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP USA BLUEBOOK UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC UNISHIPPERS VELDE FORD, INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO BEACH, CITY OF VEY, CARRIE VERO BEARING & BOLT VERO HERITAGE, INC VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER VISION VIDEO VICKERS, REGINALD VILJEAN, JASON WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608 WESTSIDE ANIMAL HOSPITAL WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC WILLHOFF, PATSY WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC WATERWORKS CAR WASH WAL*MART STORE 931 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR WINFIELD, VICTORIA WASTE MANAGEMENT WATERVIEW PRESS INC WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC WALGREEN CO WINTZ, SANDRA K WINN DIXIE W W GRAINGER INC WESTERFIELD, GEORGE & KATHRYN XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE MILLER, JOSEPH WODTKE, RUSSELL LICARI, LINDA PADGETT, JAMES MERCURI, DEBRA LYONS, THOMAS CARLEY, MORRIS MC CULLERS JR, GEORGE OR BRUCE February 13, 2001 19 CHECK DATE 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 CHECK AMOUNT 59.67 14.51 100.00 720.36 109.84 324.98 4,023.00 10.14 1,725.27 21,962.26 2,983.57 189.26 316.06 678.00 297.50 275.99 807.61 7,284.43 406.76 255.00 108.15 818.48 30.00 42.62 130.00 144.00 75.00 7.19 2,581.25 670.00 86,844.12 143.42 155.09 285.32 68.14 36.48 310.50 107.49 654.77 63.27 782.40 591.94 195.20 333.88 243.07 461.88 78.06 15.58 2,087,559.22 BK 117PG031 7.1. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 25, 2001: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JANUARY 25, 2001 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of January 19, 2001 to January 25, 2001. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period January 19-25.2001, as requested. CHECK NAME NUMBER CHECK CHECK DATE AMOUNT O 020988 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020989 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020990 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020991 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020992 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020993 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020994 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020995 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020996 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 0020997 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 2001-01-19 85.00 O 296215 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE 2001-01-25 25.99 O 296216 ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE 2001-01-25 387.00 O 296217 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, 2001-01-25 948.72 O 296218 ATLANTIC REPORTING 2001-01-25 100.85 O 296219 ADDISON OIL CO 2001-01-25 1,601.49 O 296220 ARCHIVE PUBLISHING 2001-01-25 1,216.00 February 13, 2001 BK 11 7 06 0 3 2 20 CHECK NAME NUMBER O 296221 ALLIED ELECTRONICS, INC O 296222 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES O 296223 A T & T 0296224 ASHBROOK CORPORATION O 296225 ANTHONY BAIL BONDS O 296226 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION O 296227 AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC O 296228 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB O 296229 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES O 296230 A R S CLIMATIC/TRIMM 0296231 APOLLO ENTERPRISES O 296232 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND 0296233 ANCOR CORE INC. O 296234 ALL CLEAR LOCATING SERVICES 0296235 ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT O 296236 AL SZABO 0296237 ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION O 296238 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK O 296239 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS O 296240 BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY O 296241 BAKER & TAYLOR INC O 296242 BRODART CO O 296243 BLAIS ELECTRIC, INC O 296244 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION O 296245 BROWN, DONALD JR O 296246 BELLSOUTH COMMUNICATION O 296247 BOOKS ON TAPE INC O 296248 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT O 296249 BELLSOUTH MOBILITY O 296250 BELLSOUTH O 296251 BENSON, DANIEL MD 0296252 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF 0296253 BENNETT MEDIA CORP O 296254 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION O 296255 BLACK DIAMOND 0296256 BURKE, LILLIAN 0296257 BURNER, WILLARD III 0296258 BELLSOUTH O 296259 BUSINESS & LEGAL REPORTS INC 0296260 CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY 0296261 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC 0296262 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 0296263 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC 0296264 CHUCK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC O 296265 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC O 296266 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC O 296267 CORBIN, SHIRLEY E O 296268 CLINIC PHARMACY O 296269 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY O 296270 CSR AMERICA, INC. O 296271 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 0296272 COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF O 296273 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS O 296274 COMPUTER LIMITS 0296275 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 0296276 CAMERON, NANCY O 296277 CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS O 296278 CONDOMINIUM MANAGEMENT MANUAL February 13, 2001 21 CHECK DATE 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 CHECK AMOUNT 755.16 36.49 80.32 838.79 844.90 150.00 1,264.87 138.34 370.01 3,450.00 678.14 45,333.88 216.00 177.30 9,844.65 1,587.60 50.00 3,178.75 8,251.48 9,873.39 1,426.76 2,092.75 150.00 74.59 1,966.00 366.46 486.00 185.14 17.02 2,566.47 200.00 19,646.07 483.60 30.38 427.05 80.00 70.00 431.47 620.00 187.55 4,565.71 924.75 661.45 513.00 995.80 13,512.59 234.50 908.64 217.74 3,613.64 256.50 475.00 112.65 59.00 1,056.00 393.73 796.00 35.00 BR 1 1 7 PG 0 3 3 CHECK NUMBER 0296279 O 296280 O 296281 0296282 0296283 O 296284 O 296285 0296286 0296287 0296288 O 296289 0296290 0296291 0296292 O 296293 O 296294 O 296295 O 296296 O 296297 O 296298 O 296299 0296300 O 296301 O 296302 0296303 0296304 0296305 O 296306 O 296307 0296308 0296309 0296310 0296311 0296312 O 296313 O 296314 O 296315 O 296316 0296317 0296318 O 296319 O 296320 O 296321 O 296322 0296323 0296324 O 296325 0296326 O 296327 O 296328 O 296329 O 296330 O 296331 O 296332 O 296333 O 296334 O 296335 O 296336 O 296337 O 296338 NAME MM CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & DAVIS, JAMES DELTA SUPPLY CO DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC DOCTORS' CLINIC DOW, HOWELL, GILMORE, DAVIDSON TITLES, INC DAVIS, BRENDA DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC DOCTORS' CLINIC DILLON, EDWARD D DOCTORS' CLINIC ELLIS K PHELPS AND CO, INC EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES EXPEDITER INC, THE ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC ENCORE BROADCAST EQUIPMENT EVERGLADES FARM FEDEX FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO FLORIDA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC FLINN, SHEILA I FELLSMERE, CITY OF FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT FACTICON, INC FACERS -FACERS TRESURER FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL GATEWAY COMPANIES, INC GALE GROUP, THE GATOR LUMBER COMPANY GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS G E CAPITAL COMMERCIAL GOUGE, AIMEE HARRIS SANITATION, INC HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES HILL MANUFACTURING HACH COMPANY HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL HOUSCH, Y TOMMY HALLIDAY, TODD HOLIDAY INN HANSON ENGINEERS, HARRINGTON HENDLEY,MD INDIAN RIVER INDIAN RIVER INDIAN RIVER INSTRUMENTATION INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC INDUSTRIAL LEON COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY SERVICES, INC SERVICE CENTER PLASTICS SOLID February 13, 2001 PG 034 INC INC 22 CHECK DATE 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 CHECK AMOUNT 19.95 92.80 113.94 132.61 1,840.95 36.75 1,606.41. 15,580.88 6.96 76.56 124.75 15.00 300.00 200.00 1,093.20 98.00 46.99 2,269.32 399.00 38.41 166.56 500.00 156.90 60.00 64,043.64 44.39 1,176.84 91.00 101.78 25.00 950.00 150.00 761.29 24.00 25.00 3,535.00 143.33 4.21 46.21 3,196.72 2,538.76 83,318.27 305.12 79.82 60.49 387.48 897.47 164.25 6,429.32 4,999.00 8,970.00 92.00 13,945.50 452.24 29.00 82,190.45 1,650.71 275.00 380.00 314.08 CHECK NUMBER O 296339 O 296340 O 296341 O 296342 O 296343 O 296344 O 296345 O 296346 O 296347 0296348 O 296349 0296350 O 296351 0296352 O 296353 O 296354 0296355 O 296356 0296357 O 296358 O 296359 O 296360 O 296361 O 296362 O 296363 O 296364 O 296365 0296366 O 296367 0296368 O 296369 O 296370 0296371 O 296372 O 296373 O 296374 O 296375 O 296376 O 296377 O 296378 0296379 O 296380 O 296381 O 296382 O 296383 O 296384 O 296385 O 296386 O 296387 O 296388 0296389 0296390 0296391 0296392 0296393 0296394 0296395 0296396 NAME INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE - IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT JACKSON ELECTRONICS JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR J A SEXAUER INC JOHNSON, ANSELMO, MURDOCK, JLT INSURANCE SERVICES JONES CHEMICALS, INC KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL KULP, WILLIAM KEVIN KELLY'S DIESEL SERVICE LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS LFI VERO BEACH, INC LANDSCAPE CONNECTION LEAHCHEM INDUSTRIES, INC MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY MICROFORMS MANAGEMENT CORP MACHT, KENNETH MCLEOD, PETER H MASTELLER & MOLER, INC MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE MEDCHECK MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC MACWILLIAM, KEVIN, ESQ MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC MURPHY, DEBBIE MARTIN, CRISTI MANN, DANIEL MCCULLY, WILLIAM KEITH MCGRIFF, BARBARA R MCGRIFF, APRIL MUSUMECI, NANELLE NEW READERS PRESS NICOSIA, ROGER J DO NAN MCKAY & ASSOCIATES, INC NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE NICHOLS, EVELYN OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS OFFICE DEPOT, INC ORLANDO, KAREN M PAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING CO PARKS RENTAL INC PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PIPPIN TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT,INC POWER, JOHN H ESQ February 13, 2001 23 CHECK DATE 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 CHECK AMOUNT 722.91 2,893.50 2,572.14 74,850.62 124,437.08 320.83 25.00 350.00 4.81 76.50 91.35 99.90 2,282.30 1,050.00 638.00 70.78 1,459.52 30.00 799.47 715.87 336.00 588.16 71.50 612.75 57.35 549.80 179.50 5.00 4,474.50 240.74 195.92 514.08 185.01 2,603.09 195.00 129.00 38.50 1,280.83 22.00 90.00 118.45 148.61 1,911.10 360.00 214.00 6,495.41 95.12 449.14 301.63 1,921.09 238.00 212.50 730.59 79.06 32.60 85.86 150.98 865.00 BK 11 P 035 0296446 T 0296447 UN 0296448 U 0296449 U 0296450 UN 0296451 VE 0296452 VE 0296453 VE 0296454 VER CHECK NAME NUMBER 0296397 PAVCO CONSTRUCTION, INC 0296398 PORT CONSOLIDATED 0296399 PLEZALL WIPERS, INC 0296400 POSTMASTER 0296401 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 0296402 PROSPER JANET C 0296403 POLYSONICS, INC 0296404 RIEDEL, VICTOR 0296405 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC 96406 RADIOLOGY IMAGING ASSOCIATES 96407 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA 96408 RAYMOND, ROY SHERIFF OF 96409 R & G SOD FARMS 96410 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 96411 ROYAL CUP COFFEE 6412 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 6413 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET 6414 RED WING SHOE STORE 6415 SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS 6416 HARDWARE CO, INC 417 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, 418 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 419 SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC 420 SUNRISE FORD TRACTOR & 21 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 22 SKAGGS, PAUL MD 23 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES 24 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 25 SAFECO, INC 6 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 7 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 8 SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY EQUIP 9 SOUTHEAST DESALTING ASSOC SARAH BRYSON INDUSTRIES SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF STAGE & SCREEN SELF -FUNDING ACTUARIAL SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT SUNGARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY SPEIRS, DONNA SMITH, FRAN TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, TITLEIST TRUGREEN CMEMLAWN SMITH, TERRY L TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS HIRD PARTY SOLUTIONS INC OMMY HILFIGER GOLF IQUE BOOKS, INC S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUPUE SA BLUEBOOK ox BENEFITS OF FL,INC LDE FORD INC RO BEACH, CITY OF RO BEACH, CITY OF 02 02 02 02 02 02 029 029 029 029 029 0296 0296 0296 0296 02964 02964 02964 02964 02964 029642 029642 029642 029642 O 296430 O 296431 O 296432 O 296433 O 296434 0296435 0296436 0296437 0296438 0296439 0296440 0296441 0296442 0296443 0296444 0296445 T INC 0 CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC February 13, 2001 BK . 7 id 036 CHECK DATE 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001..01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001_01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001_01_25 2001-01-25 2001_01_25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 2001-01_25 2001-01-25 24 CHECK AMOUNT 2,035.50 851.84 114.29 136.00 144.00 101.50 4,109.71 102.51 255.44 300.00 36,882.40 21,222.33 170.00 78.67 145.10 80.30 228.27 148.00 3,135.46 184.26 450.80 35.31 193.24 430.80 1,844.10 8.00 1,660.76 2.232.20 828.71 933.40 150.78 375.60 15.00 29.30 320.63 1,485.00 33.94 500.00 100.00 10,476.99 38.84 371.00 202.30 314.64 1,681.63 48.00 40.45 816.84 216.98 561.45 1,223.54 12,719.58 646.00 2,122.20 998.36 10,813.59 608.80 47.10 CHECK NUMBER O 296455 O 296456 O 296457 0296458 O 296459 0296460 0296461 O 296462 0296463 O 296464 O 296465 0296466 O 296467 0296468 0296469 0296470 0296471 0296472 O 296473 O 296474 O 296475 O 296476 O 296477 O 296478 O 296479 0296480 0296481 O 296482 0296483 0296484 0296485 0296486 0296487 0296488 0296489 0296490 0296491 0296492 0296493 0296494 0296495 0296496 0296497 0296498 0296499 0296500 0296501 O 296502 M O 296503 J O 296504 P 0296505 W O 296506 P 0296507 S O 296508 S O 296509 H 0296510 RE O 296511 R NAME VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT VERO BEARING & BOLT VIRCO INC WATSON, JOHNNYE WILLHOFF, PATSY WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC WILSON GOLF DIVISION WILLIAMS, BETTY R, RN WYNDHAM WESTSHORE WALGREEN CO W W GRAINGER INC WODTKE, RUSSELL XEROX CORPORATION MILLER, JOSEPH BRENNAN-BROOKS, THERESA WODTKE, RUSSELL MERCURI, DEBRA ROYAL, THOMAS HARP, RUBY HARPER, RICHARD G FINKELSTEIN, RYAN WEAKLEY, WINSTON L LAMPKIN, STEPHANIE TIMINSKY, CAREY & TIM CAPTAIN, JIM LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION, INC CASTILLO, NELLY BAKER, JESS CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES DRONCHI, RUTHANN ALDD FLACH, N W WRUSLIK, JOHN M GHO VER BEACH INC WILSON, DOROTHY WHITE, CHARLES R KYLE'S RUN DIBBLE, LINDA C KNISLEY, VINCENT L SHELLY, JOHNNY M MORRISON, MELISSA COOK, DANIEL OR HOLLY KERWIN, DENNIS J SIEDLER, KAREN LEKANIDES, GEORGE DODSON, GEORGE ILLER SR, JOE D ONES, BOBBIE RYOR SR, ELIGHA INDSOR PROPERTIES, INC ROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC TEWART, DAVID ENIOR, JOSEPH OLIDAY BUILDERS YNOLDS JR, WILLIAM D OBINSON, TOBY February 13, 2001 25 CHECK DATE 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 CHECK AMOUNT 112.32 30.00 100.00 17.77 21,350.10 200.00 104.00 172.80 823.00 91.00 210.00 544.31 48.60 49.45 255.19 722.24 1,406.76 591.94 194.46 486.30 42.37 29.84 53.86 47.17 35.33 39.92 33.76 170.42 74.57 48.86 18.40 27.24 37.39 40.53 82.28 42.33 33.72 22.32 30.10 112.63 30.99 36.65 38.32 1,218.76 82.64 100.00 8.69 25.12 119.74 91.90 46.30 10.20 65.13 46.39 314.76 64.50 65.67 BOK 1 1 7 PG 0 3 7 CHECK NUMBER O 2965 O 2965 02965 O 2965 02965 02965 O 29651 029651 029652 O 29652 029652 O 29652 O 29652 O 29652 O 29652 029652 029652 029652 0296530 0296531 0296532 0296533 0296534 0296535 0296536 0296537 0296538 0296539 O 296540 0296541 0296542 O 296543 O 296544 O 296545 O 296546 O 296547 O 296548 0296549 O 296550 0296551 O 296552 0296553 O 296554 O 296555 0296556 0296557 O 296558 0296559 O 296560 O 296561 O 296562 O 296563 O 296564 O 296565 O 296566 NAME 12 RA/LEY, MITCHELL 13 TURNER, JANE R 14 GAMBLE, ALAN 15 DE LEON, EDUARDO 16 OGSBURY, DAVID M 17 CAL BUILDERS, INC 8 COTA, RHONDA 9 EMERICK, RUSS 0 MCKENZIE, HAROLD D 1 JERUSALEM PITA 2 LEFRANCOIS, MARJORIE 3 FLORIDA AIDS RIDE #2 4 ANDERSON, FRED 5 ANDERSON, CAMELIA AND CITY OF 6 BIEMANN, GWEN 7 BROXTON, LYDIA 8 BEUTTELL, PETER M 9 BILKEN GROUP BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY CORR, RHODA L C P E ASSOCIATES CAPAK, GERALD T CARONE, PAUL CARLUCCI, LEONARD A DOOLITTLE,JAMES A & ASSOCIATES DOVE, E WILSON EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113) EVANS, ALFRED FOGERTY, GEORGE A FRESH, DANIEL J FT PIERCE, CITY OF FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC FORD, ROBERT J GASKILL, ROBERT GIFFORD GROVES, LTD GRACE'S LANDING LTD HOLM, LEO HUNLEY, J MICHAEL JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES JAHOLKOWSKI, MIKE JULIN, PAUL JOHNSTON, PATTIE JACKOWSKI, MICHAEL JOHNSON, MICHELLE AND F P & L JONES, ALPHONSO KOLB, GREGORY L - DECEASED KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA LAWRENCE, TERRY A LANGLEY, PHILIP G LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS LAPPERT, ANN OR RONALD MIXELL, LLONALD AND/OR February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 ,E PG 038 26 CHECK DATE 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 CHECK AMOUNT 13.71 28.29 45.17 40.84 46.89 31.63 14.52 7.89 52.60 80.54 79.72 261.26 239.00 11.00 317.00 224.00 285.00 627.00 281.00 324.00 96.22 836.44 251.00 2,800.00 343.00 369.00 343.00 4,676.00 271.00 931.00 400.00 300.00 233.00 774.22 85.00 331.00 286.00 8,760.00 5,152.00 494.00 414.00 3,538.00 337.00 170.00 395.00 353.00 19.00 251.00 438.00 234.00 177.00 235.00 9,354.00 234.00 255.00 CHECK NUMBER O 296567 O 296568 O 296569 O 296570 O 296571 O 296572 O 296573 O 296574 O 296575 0296576 0296577 O 296578 0296579 O 296580 O 296581 0296582 O 296583 0296584 0296585 O 296586 0296587 O 296588 0296589 0296590 O 296591 0296592 O 296593 O 296594 O 296595 O 296596 0296597 0296598 0296599 O 296600 0296601 O 296602 O 296603 O 296604 0296605 0296606 O 296607 NAME M 0 D INVESTMENTS MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM MALGERIA, PRISCILLA MCGRIFF, SHARON AND CITY OF MEAD, THOMAS H OR HELEN S NORMAN, DOUGLAS OR BARBARA ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND OSCEOLA COUNTY SECTION 8 OATHOUT, GENE PALMER TRAILER PARK PITTMAN, CATHERINE & FLORIDA POLLY, EMMA P IERSON, JOHN H DBA PALUMBO, LOUIS PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF PRICE, GLORIA REAGAN, WILLIE C RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST RICOTTI, RICARDO RIVER PARK PLACE S T FRANCIS MANOR SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR STEWART, REUBEN W STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY SANDY PINES SHELTON, ROBERT L STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR SUNDMAN, IVAN S TIMELING, PAUL B OR MARGARET SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING TUMLIN, TRACY N ULISKY, WILLIAM B OR MARLENE VERO MOBILE HOME PARK VERO FIRST CORPORATION WILLIAMS, DEBRA WASHINGTON WILLIAMS, EDITH YORK, LILLY B YORK, DAVID ZANCA, LEONARD February 13, 2001 27 CHECK DATE 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 2001-01-25 CHECK AMOUNT 891.00 203.00 419.00 26.00 281.00 357.00 357.22 304.22 331.00 267.00 34.00 884.00 627.00 343.00 405.22 246.00 507.00 245.00 317.00 5,179.00 4,161.00 318.00 302.00 455.00 505.22 5,142.00 423.00 267.00 333.00 273.00 215.00 495.00 320.00 130.00 337.00 1,420.00 68.00 270.00 189.00 378.00 588.00 932,991.19 BK iIiPG039 7. J. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 31, 2001: CHECK NUMBER O 263617 O 263705 O 264028 O 264103 O 264524 O 264852 O 264878 O 264905 O 265043 O 265047 0265152 O 265302 O 265304 O 265672 O 265957 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: FROM: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JANUARY 31, 2001 APPROVAL OF WARRANTS EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of January 31, 2001. Attachment: ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period January 31, 2001, as requested. NAME LAVOIE, DANIEL TREMBLAY, PIERRE SELLECK, ROGER PARIS, RUTH A SEA OAKS INVESTMENT, LTD JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS, INC LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION, INC CHAMBLISS, CHIQUITA AND CITY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE CO COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INS CO KNIGHT, VERNON C OHLIGER, KATHY L LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION, INC CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND MORGNER JR, WALTER February 13, 2001 BKII PG 040 CHECK DATE 1999-06-03 1999-06-03 1999-06-10 1999-06-10 1999-06-17 1999-06-24 1999-06-24 1999-06-30 1999-06-30 1999-06-30 1999-06-30 1999-06-30 1999-06-30 1999-07-15 1999-07-15 28 CHECK AMOUNT . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID CHECK NUMBER O 26597 O 26610 026638 O 26639 0266432 O 266450 O 266496 0266514 0266546 0266748 O 266932 O 266978 O 267070 O 267364 0267685 0267705 0268099 0268134 0268298 O 268447 O 268474 0268498 0268515 0269096 0269107 0269209 0269477 O 269493 O 269801 0269813 0270018 O 270143 O 270145 O 270201 O 270370 0270526 0270623 O 270631 0270646 O 270656 0270671 O 270682 0270693 0271474 0271482 0271487 O 271521 0271970 0271976 O 272312 O 272338 0272343 0272346 0272361 0272365 T 0272615 S NAME 5 AMERITREND HOMES 5 FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER 2 KNAPP, EVA 0 HARE, TOMI K HOLIDAY BUILDERS REDUS, BRUCE A DARRIN, STEWART & SUZZAN CHASE, BETTY J CHAMBLISS, CHIQUITA AND CITY FALZONE, CHRISTOPHER VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT WILLIAMS, EARL L EMERICK, RUSS FRIEDLAND, SHELDON MCGUIGAN, JAMES & PAT HIBISCUS MANOR DEVINE, DON BELLA, LAURA & ALDO LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE BENTLEY, BEVERLY DARRAH, NANCY BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H CHAMBLISS, CHIQUITA AND CITY SAYER, JAMES C PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES EMS ENTERPRISES MC MILLAN, JOHNNY LEE CHAMBLISS, AVESHONNE LUPO, JESSICA PROVIDENCE INTERNATIONAL INC NATIONAL PROPANE CORP HARRIS, JULIE A HESS, ELIZABETH COX CHAMBLISS, CHIQUITA AND CITY CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT BELMONTE, JAMES R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC DI ROCCO CONSTRUCTION VAN ALLEN, JENNIFER MGB CNOSTRUCTION YOUNG, ROBERT P RUSS, JAMES B DUNCAN, EUGENE & LESLIE GONZALEZ, JORGE L STEWART, NORMAN & CATHERINE CHAMBLISS, CHIQUITA AND CITY MGB CONSTRUCTION, INC HALLMAN, BRUCE OLVERA, OMAR POSLOSKI, ZENA SCHLITT, CHRISTOPHER P ROSENVERG, LORETTA ROBERTS, ROBIN HORPE, BONNIE J T JOHN'S RIVER WATER MGMT February 13, 2001 29 CHECK DATE 1999-07-15 1999-07-22 1999-07-22 1999-07-22 1999-07-22 1999-07-22 1999-07-22 1999-07-22 1999-07-23 1999-07-29 1999-07-29 1999-07-29 1999-08-05 1999-08-05 1999-08-12 1999-08-12 1999-08-19 1999-08-19 1999-08-26 1999-08-26 1999-08-26 1999-08-26 1999-08-26 1999-09-09 1999-09-09 1999-09-17 1999-09-17 1999-09-17 1999-09-23 1999-09-23 1999-09-30 1999-09-30 1999-09-30 1999-09-30 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-07 1999-10-21 1999-10-21 1999-10-21 1999-10-21 1999-10-28 1999-10-28 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 1999-11-04 1999-11-10 CHECK AMOUNT . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID BK 117 PG 0 14 1 CHECK NUMBER 0273040 0273059 0273063 0273084 0273099 0273108 0273136 0273155 0273163 0274151 0274327 0274371 027 027 027 027 0274 0274 0275 0275 0275 0275 0275 0275 0275 0275 02752 02752 02752 02753 02809 02885 02.915 02925 02939 02941 029426 029453 029467 029537 029589 029606 029660 029660 029661 029661 0296612 0296613 0296614 0296615 0296616 0296617 0296618 0296619 0296620 0296621 NAME TAYLOR, SANDRINE PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES MAXWELL, ANNE MC GRIEF, ELIZABETH LA PADULA, PATRICIA VAN ZYL, KARLA TALBOTT JR, DANIEL W COONEY, ADAM BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION RCL DEVELOPMENT KING, JOHN W MUTUAL TRUST 4528 DAVIS, RUSSELL 4547 WISSEL CONSTRUCTION 4557 FAXON, LINDA 4571 ROMANS, WILLIAM E 576 HINNANT, BRYAN 701 AMERICAN LEGION POST 0039 097 NEWCOME, DUKE 188 DRONCHI, RUTHANN ALDD 198 MORRISON, MELISSA 208 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC 216 GAMBLE, ALAN 219 CAL BUILDERS, INC 224 LEFRANCOIS, MARJORIE 236 HEUSER, CHRISTOPHER C 57 GLEASON, RUSSELL 83 BOWLDS, CAROLYN & GENE 85 MERCREADy, CHESTER W 04 DEEP SIX WATERSPORTS 67 RADIOLOGY IMAGING ASSOCIATES 78 DOZIER, JAMES MD 63 HOLLY, TERRY 64 UNITED STATES TREASURY 11 MYFAMILY.COM 66 FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 3 MARRIOTT BAY POINT RESORT 2 BIRD, RICHARD N 4 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING 1 ROYAL, SUSAN 3 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING 0 MEDCHECK 8 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC 9 ACE PLUMBING, INC 0 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC 1 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, ATLANTIC REPORTING ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED A A ELECTRIC SE, INC ART KRIEGER CONSTRUCTION INC AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT'L A T & T AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ARROW MAGNOLIA INTERNATIONAL February 13, 2001 B}{ t 042 30 CHECK DATE 1999-11-18 1999-11-18 1999-11-18 1999-11-18 1999-11-18 1999-11-18 1999-11-18 1999-11-18 CO 1999-11-18 1999-12-09 1999-12-16 1999-12-16 1999-12-16 1999-12-16 1999-12-16 1999-12-16 1999-12-16 1999-12-23 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 1999-12-29 2000-04-13 2000-08-31 2000-10-26 2000-11-09 2000-12-07 2000-12-14 2000-12-14 2000-12-21 2000-12-21 2001-01-04 2001-01-18 2001-01-18 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 CHECK AMOUNT . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID . 00 VOID 56.00 67.50 195.00 2,112.68 838.41 792.84 162.35 59.90 62.67 5,574.30 256.07 191.07 52,005.88 107.07 CHECK NAME NUMBER 0296622 AUTO PARTS OF 0296623 ARCH WIRELESS 0296624 ALL CLEAR LOCATING SERVICES 0296625 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 0296626 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK 0296627 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 0296628 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK 0296629 BLACK BOX CORPORATION 0296630 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 0296631 BRODART CO 0296632 BLAIS ELECTRIC, INC 0296633 BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE 0296634 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 0296635 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 0296636 BELLSOUTH 0296637 BEAZER HOMES, INC 0296638 O 296639 O 296640 0296641 O 296642 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC 0296643 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC 0296644 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 0296645 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC 0296646 CUTTING EDGE SIGN CO., THE 0296647 COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING 0296648 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 0296649 COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES 0296650 CLIFFORD, MIKE 0296651 CHAMPION MANUFACTURING INC 0296652 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 0296653 COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF 0296654 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0296655 COLUMBIA PROPANE 0296656 CARLILE, ANASTASIA 0296657 CARPENTER, DELORES 0296658 CONTINENTAL SHELF ASSOC INC 0296659 CLEAR CHANNEL PALM BEACH 0296660 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING 0296661 DEEP SIX DIVE SHOP, INC 0296662 DELTA SUPPLY CO 0296663 DEMCO INC 0296664 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 0296665 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, 0296666 DEALERS COST CORPORATION 0296667 DUVAL FORD 0296668 DOW, HOWELL, GILMORE, 0296669 DATA SUPPLIES, INC 0296670 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC 0296671 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC 0296672 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 0296673 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 0296674 DILLARD, CASSIE 0296675 DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOC VERO, INC CHECK DATE 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION 2001-01-31 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2001-01-31 BASE CAMP OUTLET BELLSOUTH 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 & 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 OF 2001-01-31 INC 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 February 13, 2001 31 CHECK AMOUNT 457.25 386.07 334.90 16.30 2,770.50 3,378.44 208,426.66 836.29 1,924.69 2,378.73 60.00 200.00 91.90 8,429.52 4,342.74 500.00 200.00 400.77 3,346.65 37.71 2,362.50 89.99 21.00 1,404.70 15.00 19,032.42 48.45 17,419.44 100.00 79.90 427.50 24.09 276.75 10.50 250.00 263.25 33,000.00 2,000.00 33.45 405.00 396.06 289.28 2,382.58 76.94 14.00 280,964.00 31,166.43 190.79 2,399.09 20,030.00 35.00 64.35 38.62 49.68 BKII:u043 CHECK NUMBER 0296676 0296677 0296678 0296679 0296680 0296681 0296682 O 296683 0296684 O 296685 O 296686 O 296687 0296688 0296689 O 296690 O 296691 0296692 0296693 0296694 0296695 0296696 0296697 0296698 O 296699 O 296700 O 296701 O 296702 0296703 0296704 0296705 O 296706 0296707 0296708 0296709 O 296710 O 296711 O 296712 0296713 O 296714 O 296715 0296716 O 296717 O 296718 O 296719 O 296720 O 296721 0296722 0296723 0296724 O 296725 O 296726 O 296727 0296728 O 296729 O 296730 0296731 NAME DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC DAY DREAMS UNIFORMS INC E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC ECKERD CORPORATION ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIP, INC EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS ELPEX, INC EDLUND & DRITENBAS EXPEDITER INC, THE ENERGY COATINGS CORP ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE ELITE TITLE EVERGLADES FARM FEDEX FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FLORIDA RURAL WATER FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON FLORIDA DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW FULLER, APRIL L FLORIDA LAKE MANAGEMENT GALE GROUP, THE GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC GREYHOUND LINES, INC. GROVE'S DICTIONARIES INC GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER GREENE, ROBERT E GARRISON, FROHLICH & ASSOCIATE H IGHSMITH, INC HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES HERITAGE BOOKS, INC H IBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL HOLIDAY INN INTERNATIONAL HEALTHSOUTH TREASURE COAST HOLIDAY BUILDERS HANSEN, SUSAN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTERTEC PUBLISHING CORP INDIAN RIVER COUNTY February 13, 2001 BK 7PG044 32 CHECK DATE 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 -2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 CHECK AMOUNT 2,007.53 47.25 66.50 47.38 491.40 14.40 9,970.00 1,678.24 13,822.77 1,138.20 2,070.00 3,600.00 2,214.90 10,000.00 793.56 35.90 28,681.43 50.00 4,455.00 6,206.30 1,371.38 250.00 15.00 1,373.21 638.72 67.12 38.62 15.00 407.95 100.20 192.00 147.52 124.05 204.50 3,950.00 179.26 13,416.65 650.00 102.38 285.70 338.60 2,083.33 15.00 348.00 262.92 500.00 87.29 60,273.87 260.00 1,699.50 99.64 134.73 136.77 15.00 500.00 1,300.00 CHECK NUMBER O 296732 O 296733 O 296734 O 296735 0296736 O 296737 O 296738 O 296739 O 296740 0296741 O 296742 O 296743 O 296744 0296745 O 296746 O 296747 0296748 0296749 O 296750 O 296751 0296752 O 296753 O 296754 0296755 O 296756 O 296757 0296758 O 296759 0296760 O 296761 O 296762 O 296763 0296764 O 296765 O 296766 O 296767 0296768 O 296769 O 296770 0296771 0296772 O 296773 0296774 O 296775 O 296776 O 296777 O 296778 O 296779 O 296780 O 296781 O 296782 O 296783 O 296784 NAME INNOVATIVE NETWORK SYSTEMS INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY INTEL GROUP, THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA JENNINGS, ANTOINE JUDAH, HUSTON JLT INSURANCE SERVICES JONES CHEMICALS, INC KOMARINETZ, ROBERT KELLY TRACTOR CO K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING KRUGER CONSTRUCTION CORP KRUGER, INC KING, TOM KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL KELLEY, WINFRED KRISS, HOLDEN E LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. LFI VERO BEACH, INC LESCO, INC LUNA, JORGE LUNA, JUVENAL LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION LIER GROVES INC LOWTHER CREMATION SERVICES INC INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE MIKES GARAGE MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS MICRO WAREHOUSE MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC MID -STATE MECHANICAL MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM MARC INDUSTRIES MGB CONSTRUCTION INC MOSS, ROGER MERIT APPAREL COMPANY, INC MORRIS, GENE E NOLTE, DAVID C NICOSIA, ROGER J DO OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE ON IT'S WAY OFFICE DEPOT, INC ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION P B S & J PRESS JOURNAL PRECISION CONTRACTING P INEWOODS ANIMAL HOSPITAL February 13, 2001 33 CHECK DATE 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 CHECK AMOUNT 536.25 198.66 3,750.00 1,687.50 25.00 39.44 85.00 1,822.37 110.00 41.20 275.00 2,288.07 285.78 206.00 750.00 30.00 2,387.36 10.15 3,693.02 500.00 685.75 569.48 735.20 71.70 82.40 123.60 2,000.00 500.00 300.00 18,977.91 550.00 2,150.50 64.05 191.63 1,000.00 138.60 162.02 500.00 69.52 570.00 1,362.91 191,639.17 1,500.00 2,030.52 185.24 4,444.14 1,050.00 49.43 1,000.00 5,458.00 122.00 6,515.00 15.00 OK I I i PG 0 4 5 CHECK NAME NUMBER O 296785 POWERCON ELECTONICS SERVICES O 296786 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 0296787 PARKER, DEBBIE 0296788 PRYOR, ELIGHA SR O 296789 PESHA, JESSICA 0296790 PENA, JORGE O 296791 PAPICO CONSTRUCTION, INC 0296792 PAGLIARDI, ROXANE 0296793 PRESTIGE ALUMINUM 0296794 QUALITY BOOKS, INC 0296795 RINGHAVER 0296796 RODDENBERRY, W E, P A O 296797 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE O 296798 RELIABLE POLY JOHN SERVICES O 296799 RIVER PARR PLACE 0296800 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING O 296801 ROMANO, CHRISTINA O 296802 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET O 296803 SEARS COMMERCIAL CREDIT 0296804 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF 0296805 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC O 296806 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE O 296807 SOUTHARD, TERRY O 296808 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC O 296809 STATE ATTORNEY 19TH CIRCUIT O 296810 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 0296811 SHELTRA & SON CONSTRUCTION 0296812 SHERWOOD, FRANCES G 0296813 SIGNS IN A DAY O 296814 SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC 0296815 SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0296816 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES 0296817 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL 0296818 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC 0296819 0296820 O 296821 O 296822 O 296823 O 296824 0296825 O 296826 O 296827 O 296828 O 296829 O 296830 0296831 0296832 O 296833 O 296834 O 296835 O 296836 O 296837 0296838 O 296839 O 296840 O 296841 SALEM PRESS, INC SLEZAK, MARY SOLINET SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL SMYTH SYSTEMS INC SKOK, ROBERT S SOURCEBOOKS, INC SHEPARD'S SKAGGS COMPANIES INC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY & TECHNICAL SMYTH SYSTEMS TIPPIN, JOHN W TIME LIFE EDUCATION INC TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOOK CLUB T A P SOD TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS TURNER PEST CONTROL INC USI, INC US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF February 13, 2001 BK1IIPG046 34 CHECK DATE 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 CHECK AMOUNT 150.00 332.06 154.50 500.00 38.62 103.00 4,900.00 500.00 15.00 312.85 658.98 150.00 45.66 88.51 84.00 648.53 19.31 224.63 851.88 225.00 443.33 4,676.75 39.55 110.70 12,010.72 30.00 51,628.44 112.30 224.00 33.89 590.40 181.84 5,975.47 709.90 936.75 108.50 342.34 143.85 680.17 7,174.93 113.60 152.48 891.34 1,350.97 100.00 1,280.00 72.58 517.01 51.48 6,422.02 118.88 1,500.00 123.46 8,723.51 9,458.37 219.33 1,801.13 CHECK NUMBER O 296842 O 296843 0296844 O 296845 O 296846 0296847 O 296848 O 296849 O 296850 O 296851 O 296852 0296853 O 296854 0296855 0296856 0296857 0296858 0296859 0296860 O 296861 O 296862 NAME VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN VANTAGE EQUIPMENT CO VIDEOFRAME COMMUNICATIONS LTD WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608 WALL STREET JOURNAL WINN DIXIE STORES INC WILLHOFF, PATSY WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642 WOLVERINE SPORTS W W GRAINGER INC WILSON, STEVEN WODTKE, RUSSELL XEROX CORPORATION HENRY, ANTHONY ESTATE OF F. HAMILTON GOUGE PRYOR SR, ELIGHA ROBB, BAYARD BRUCE SMITH CUSTOM HOMES CAL BUILDERS INC O 296863 BENEDICK, FRANK M O 296864 BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION CO 0296865 INCITCO REALTY INC O 296866 BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION CO 0296867 HEUSER, CHRISTOPHER C O 296868 VINSON, SAMUEL GRAY O 296869 GHA, GRAND HARBOR LTD 0296870 LEWIS, KATHY OFFORD O 296871 FLYNN SR, MICHAEL L 0296872 HARDEN, KATINA L 0296873 GILBERT, RANDY O 296874 PRIME OUTLETS AT VERO O 296875 GHO VERO BEACH INC O 296876 BRESSERT, TERESA 0296877 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC O 296878 CHALKER, PAULA 0296879 GROZA BUILDERS INC 0296880 FROST TRUSTEE, ANNE 0296881 MC IVOR, NIGEL 0296882 BEAZER HOMES CORP 0296883 MASSETT, LOWELL 0296884 WALKER, JOSEPH R 0296885 ST LUCIE DEVELOPMENT 0296886 GLEASON, RUSSELL 0296887 ATLANTIC MARINE CENTER 0296888 CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO 0296889 FLEMMING, PEACOLA 0296890 GATRELL, ROBERT 0296891 LEE, KATHLEEN 0296892 PELLETIER, CLAUDE 0296893 MEGO, RUTH O 296894 COPP, SEIJA O 296895 COPELAND, MARGARET 0296896 TREE TOWNE CHRISTMAS TREES 0296897 REEDY, RONALD & VALERIE 0296898 AMERITREND HOMES 0296899 HUFF FRANCE BEACH CORP February 13, 2001 S L CHECK DATE 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 35 CHECK AMOUNT 100.00 39.70 17,441.36 61.90 87.19 175.00 564.95 130.00 201.35 171.85 909.95 41.10 28.32 121.07 1,634.71 15.89 74.22 16.56 85.99 39.24 20.33 58.32 81.04 41.23 27.01 80.31 11.88 82.15 11.86 33.58 99.16 44.26 37.15 72.79 42.79 193.11 52.15 27.81 37.49 83.18 330.71 54.63 20.18 33.35 43.41 13.90 63.41 32.69 26.26 17.76 168.65 71.25 29.25 46.06 302.56 49.77 57.31 50.35 BK 1 PG 0 4 7 • CHECK NUMBER 0296900 0296901 0296902 0296903 0296904 0296905 0296906 0296907 0296908 O 296909 O 296910 0296911 0296912 0296913 O 296914 O 296915 O 296916 0296917 O 296918 O 296919 0296920 O 296921 O 296922 0296923 0296924 0296925 0296926 0296927 O 296928 O 296929 0296930 O 296931 0296932 O 296933 0296934 0296935 O 296936 O 296937 NAME SAMS, BONNIE MAHER, GEORGE H DALTON, CINDY DEVINE BENSON, CYNTHIA TUTRONE, DR GILBERT WILLIAMS, SHANI PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC TILME, ANDRE MALONEY, BERNARD W OAKES, ROBERT CHANNING CORP XXIX ESKIN, ROBERT C BOWLDS, CAROLYN & GENE GAGLIARDI, MARK SUSI, EDWIN F MERCREADY, CHESTER W GARBER, RUSS WERNICKI, JO ANNE LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION, INC WATSON, SALLIE C HARVEY, CHARLES T LOZINAK, DORPTHY CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES HIGGINS, STANLEY M BROWNING, GERELL H RIVILLAS, BRYAN FLOOD, SANDY RICHARDS, JANNETTE CLAYTON, CRAIG MEAD, JOHN R TURNER, JANE R PAULISON, CURTIS A PASTIS, ALIX G & MENELAOS STORY-UNGERBUUEHLER, DENISE D GONZALES, REBECCA DEEP SIX WATERSPORTS DONMEZ, MEHMET RAUPERS, KIMBERLY CHECK DATE 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 2001-01-31 CHECK AMOUNT 24.00 41.14 14.37 53.13 22.68 6.74 75.14 14.60 86.06 65.95 65.33 39.41 16.23 7.34 21.62 38.96 84.62 100.00 127.22 1.60 92.24 29.52 87.82 64.66 25.43 37.62 26.19 61.94 37.63 25.67 50.41 5.01 32.00 34.10 81.82 74.54 86.52 47.54 1,314,219.63 7.K. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 2001: February 13, 2001 BKI PGoia 36 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney January 22, 2001 Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment weeks of December 25, 2000 through January 15, 2001. Listed below are each court -related cost. Vendor: Celeste Hartsfield Karen M. Orlando Patricia B. Held Karen M. Orlando Shirley E. Corbin Cristi Martin Janet Prosper American Reporting American Reporting Celeste L. Hartsfield Elisa LesCamela Karen M. Orlando Patricia B. Held Shirley E Corbin Sheila I. Flinn Donna Speirs Donna Speirs Elisa LesCamela Kristine Rosendahl Patricia B. Held Marsha Ewing Michael C. Riordan, Psy.D. Unishippers Wayne R. McDonough, Esq. Hammond & Smith, P.A. Victoria Winfield, Esq. Janet Prosper Shirley E. Corbin Patricia B. Held Cristi Martin Cristi Martin Janet Prosper Cristi Martin Janet Prosper Donna Speirs Cristi Martin Patricia B. Held Donna Speirs Donna Speirs Kevin MacWilliam, Esq. John H. Power, Esq. Shirley E Corbin Karen M. Orlando Donna Speirs Sheila I. Flinn Sheila I. Flinn February 13, 2001 MEME Payment type: Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription - State Attorney Costs Transcription State Attorney Costs Clinical Evaluation State Attorney Costs Indigent Dependency Case Indigent Dependent Cases (11) Public Defender Conflicts Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Public Defender Conflicts Public Defender Conflicts Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription 37 to the following vendors for the the vendors and the amount of Amount: 105.00 56.00 612.50 56.00 45.50 56.00 213.50 68.00 51.00 91.00 31.50 105.00 126.00 402.50 707.00 318.50 56.00 213.50 25.81 38.50 9.00 750.00 10.14 1.238.45 10,450.00 670.00 35.00 679.00 56.00 136.50 77.00 52.50 70.00 70.00 168.00 329.00 56.00 129.50 84.00 734.43 865.00 73.50 238.00 31.50 52.50 38.50 PG 049 Cristi Martin Donna Speirs Donna Speirs Janet C. Prosper Shirley E Corbin Total PGB/sw Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription Transcription cc: Honorable Paul B. Kanarek, Chief Judge 38.50 283.50 56.00 101.50 161.00 521,122.83 FOR INFORMATION ONLY NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. 7.L. Code Enforcement Board - Election of Chairman Cliff Suthard and Vice Chairman Anthony Gervasio for 2001 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 6, 2001: TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Board of County Commissioners Reta Smith, Code Enforcement Board Secretary February 6, 2001 SUBJECT: Election of Code Enforcement Board Chairman This is to notify the Board that at the Code Enforcement Board meeting of January 22, 2001, the Board voted (7-0) to ratify the election of Cliff Suthard as Chairman and Anthony Gervasio as Vice Chairman of the Code Enforcement Board for the year 2001. No Board action is required. NO ACTION TAKEN OR REQUIRED. February 13, 2001 N H PG ) 50 38 7•M. South County Park Improvements, Phase II - Barth Construction, Inc. - Change Order No. 2 - Project No. 9624 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 24, 2001: TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: ames Chandler, County Administrator James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Direc • �l Christopher J. Kafer, Jr , P E , County Enginee Change Order No. 2 for South County Park Impf'ovements, Phase II IRC Project No. 9624 January 24. 2001 CONSENT AGENDA Construction of the above mentioned project is underway. During the construction, issues came -up that required modifications to the contract. Also, the Notice to Proceed was issued on June 21, 2000, however, the Building Permit was not issued until August 7, 2000 (47 days after Notice to Proceed). In October 2000 the Board of County Commissioners approved Change Order No. 1 extending the contract date by 25 days from December 22, 2000 to January 19, 2001. The item shown on Change Order No. 2 is as follows: Item No. 1: Extension of Time by 22 Days from January 19, 2001 to February 10, 2001 to provide the contractor with the full 47 day delay prior to obtaining the Building Permit, which was not the fault of the Contractor (Barth Construction Co.) RFCOMMFNDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the attached Change Order No. 2 for extension of time of 22 days. This time will be added to the current contract time of 205 days. This will result in a new contract time of 227 days. The Contract Amount does not change. ATTA C'HMENTS 1. Change Order No. 2 February 13, 2001 39 IN II PG 051 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved Change Order No. 2 with Barth Construction, Inc. for a 22 -day extension resulting in a new contract time of 227 days, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 IS ON FILE IN THE Of FICE OF THE CI ERK TO THE BOARD 7.N. Assistant County Attorney - Approval to Hire The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 2, 2001: MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners From. Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney ,-1=1-1) 2 Re: Assistant County Attorney 11 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the hiring of an assistant county attorney I for the County Attorney's Office at an annual salary range of $41,079-$64,700, authorize the County Attorney to set a starting salary depending on the successful candidate s experience and qualifications, and authorize the County Attorney, the Personnel Office, and the Office of Management and Budget to expend funds and take whatever steps are necessary to recruit such an employee. Discussion: The County Attorney's Office is presently staffed by two attorneys who are board certified by the Board of Legal Specialization and Education of the Flonda Bar in city, county and local government law. From the mid -1980's until early 2000 the Office had at least three attorneys. During part of that time there was an additional part-time fourth attomey. With the County Attorney's Office reviewing virtually all agenda items, including contracts, ordinances and resolutions, drafting documents, providing legal advice to the Board of County Commissioners and the county administration, and making court appearances, the need for a third attorney has become apparent. Consequently, I respectfully request authorization to hire an assistant county attomey. February 13, 2001 BKI11PG052 40 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams. the Board unanimously authorized the hiring of an Assistant County Attorney I for the County Attorney's office with an annual salary range of $41,079- $64,700; authorized the County Attorney to set a starting salary depending on the successful candidate's experience and qualifications; and authorized the County Attorney, the Personnel Office, and the Office of Management and Budget to expend funds and take whatever steps are necessary to recruit such an employee, as requested by County Attorney Rangel. 7.0. Atlantic Coast Enter rises Inc. Sand Mine Phase VI - Cash De osit and Escrow A ' reement A royal 1 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 31, 2001: TO: The Board of County Commissioners William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney January 31, 2001 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Approval of Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement for Phase VI of Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. Sand Mine Atlantic Coast Enterpnses, Inc. and has posted the necessary Deposit and Escrow Agreement wishes to move into Phase VI of its sand mine mining bonds and executed the attached Cash RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please approve the attached Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement (SP -MA -95- 04-17) for Phase VI and authorize the Chairman to execute same. WGC/nhm Attachment February 13, 2001 41 BK f17JGQ53 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement for Phase VI of Atlantic Coast Enterprises, Inc. sand mine, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF CASH DEPOSIT AND ESCROW AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.P. Election of Chairman Norman Hensick and Vice Chairman Gene Winne by the Planning and Zoning Commission for 2001 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 6, 2001: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Cyndie Delstanches, Planning and Zoning Secretary DATE: February 6, 2001 SUBJECT: Election of Planning and Zoning Chairman and Vice Chairman This is to notify the Board that at the meeting of January 11, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to elect Norman Hensick as Chairman and Gene Winne as Vice Chairman for the year 2001. No Board action is required. NO ACTION REQUIRED 7.Q. Charles Sembler, Tax Collector - Public Official Bond and Invoice The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 6, 2001: February 13, 2001 BOK 117 PG 054 42 To: Board of County Commissioners Date: February 6. 2001 From: PJ Jones. Clerk to the Board Re: Approval of Public Official Bond and .Authorization for Pa).ment of Invoice. It would be appreciated if you would approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Public Official Bond for Charles W. Sembler II. Tax Collector. .Also attached please find invoice in the amount of $1.022 which requires your approval for payment. Thank you. 7.R. Sheri Federal E ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved and authorized the Chairman to execute the Public Official Bond for Charles W. Sembler II, Tax Collector, and approved payment of the invoice from Cassady-Carroll Insurance in the amount of $1,022.00, as requested in the memorandum. BOND IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Dei artment - Federal Annual Certi ication Rei ort - uitable Sharin A : reement The Board reviewed a letter of February 7, 2001: February 13, 2001 43 BK iI7pG055 tff ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMBEP FLORIDA S..EP!-r- ASSOCIATION MEMBER Cr NATIONAL Sr-EPIPrs ASSCCIATloN 4055 asst AVENUE VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960-1808 February 7, 2001 The Honorable Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman Indian River Board of County Commissioners 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394 Re: Federal Annual Certification Report Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement Dear Chairman Ginn: 41^ 7 R', 446PHOdat 1) 569-67C0 FEB 2001 The attached Federal Annual Certification Report and Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement need to be executed by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement is being resubmitted because of the change in administrations. If you would return the originals to me, we will forward them to the proper agencies. Sincerely, Roy Raymond, Sheriff ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the Federal Annual Certification Report and Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement, as requested by Sheriff Roy Raymond. February 13, 2001 BK 11 COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD PG 056 44 7.S. Bud ' et Amendment 009 - M.A. C.E. Grant MultiA s enc Criminal En orcement Unit Pro 'ect Generated Income Re ort The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 24, 2001: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 24, 2001 THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator FROM: Jason E. Brown r� Budget Manager SUBJECT: M.A.C.E. Grant (Mu ' Agency Criminal Enforcement Unit) Project Generated Income Budget Amendment 009 Background and Analysis The M.A.C.E. Unit is requesting authorization to utilize Project Generated Income (PGI) in the amount of $17 606.00. This M.A C E Unit Income was generated from confiscated property in drug related activities. Funds will be distributed to the Indian River County Sheriffs Office M.A.C.E. Unit for purchases as described in the attachments. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the utilization of Project Generated Income totaling $17,606 and authorize the attached Budget Amendment necessary to release the funds Attachments Budget Amendment 009 Projected Generated Income Agreement and Report ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the utilization of Project Generated Income in the amount of $17,606 and authorized Budget Amendment 009 in order to release the funds, as recommended in the memorandum. February 13, 2001 BKi17PG057 TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners BUDGET AMENDMENT 009 FROM: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager DATE January 24, 2001 Entry Number Fund/Depa menti Account Name Account Number Increase REVENUES Decrease 126-000-351-020.00 $17,606 EXPENSES M.A C E UNIT TRUST FUND/ Law Enforcement Expenditures 126-600-521-099.04 $17,606 COPY OF PROJECT GENERATED INCOME AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7. T. Resolution No. 2001-011 - Indian River Coun Or : ani ation MPO 2000 A Metro olitan ortionment Plan The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 2, 2001: James Chandler County Administrator Robert M. Keating, AICP'(M 1 Community Development Director February 2, 2001 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) 2000 MPO APPORTIONMENT PLAN It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 13 2001. February 13, 2001 DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS As a result of the 1990 Census, it was determined that the population of the City of Vero Beach and the surrounding densely populated area exceeded 50,000. Therefore, this area was designated as an urbanized area. As a result of this designation by the US Census. the Indian River County MPO was formed in 1993 At that time, in accordance with state and federal regulations, an MPO apportionment plan was prepared and adopted. That apportionment plan specifies the MPO's planning area and the structure of the MPO's nine member Policy Board. The 1993 apportionment plan analyzed several options regarding the structure of the MPO's Policy Board. The option selected and in place since 1993 is a nine member Board consisting of four County Commissioners, two Vero Beach City Councilmen. one Sebastian City Councilman, one Fellsmere City Councilman, and one Indian River Shores Town Councilman. In addition, the MPO Policy Board includes three nonvoting members. These are representatives of the Town of Orchid, the Indian River County School District (IRCSD), and Florida Department of Transportation, District 4. ANALYSIS Recently, the City of Sebastian requested additional voting membership on the MPO Board to reflect the City's growth since 1993. After analysis of this request and consideration of applicable state and FDOT regulations, MPO staff prepared a 2000 apportionment plan which was approved by the MPO at its January 10, 2001 meeting. The 2000 plan (a copy of which is on file at the Board of County Commissioners office) differs from the 1993 plan by the addition of two additional voting members to the MPO Board. One of these is from the City of Sebastian, while the other is from the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. Prior to transmittal of the plan to FDOT and the Governor's office for review and approval. the MPO's 2000 apportionment plan must be accepted or rejected by resolution by each general purpose local government within the MPO area. A resolution providing for the Board of County Commissioners acceptance of the MPO's 2000 Apportionment Plan is attached to this staff report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the Indian River County MPO 2000 apportionment plan and acceptance resolution, make any necessary changes, and approve the resolution. ATTACHM L NTS 1. Apportionment Plan Acceptance Resolution ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2001-011 accepting the 2000 Apportionment Plan of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization. February 13, 2001 47 BK 1 1 7 P 1059 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 011 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE 2000 APPORTIONMENT PLAN OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. WHEREAS, the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) was established pursuant to an interlocal agreement executed on April 12, 1993, and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Indian River County MPO is the designated and constituted body responsible for the urban transportation planning and programming process for the Vero Beach Urbanized Area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 339.175(3)(a), Florida Statutes. the Indian River County MPO adopted an apportionment plan in 1993 which defined the voting membership of the MPO Board; and WHEREAS, Section 339, Florida Statutes provides for periodic review and revision of the MPO's adopted apportionment plan; and WHEREAS, recent population estimates show that the City of Sebastian's population has increased such that the City warrants an additional voting member on the MPO Governing Board; and WHEREAS, the MPO prepared a 2000 apportionment plan which provides for an additional City of Sebastian voting member to reflect Sebastian's growth and provides for an additional Board of County Commissioners voting member to maintain an equitable geographic -population ratio as required by 339, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the MPO, at its January 10, 2001, meeting, approved its 2000 apportionment plan which provides for an eleven voting member MPO Board with one additional City of Sebastian representative and one additional Board of County Commissioners representative; and WHEREAS, pursuant to state requirements, each general purpose local government within the MPO area shall accept or reject the MPO's 2000 apportionment plan by resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA: 1. That the Board of County Commissioners accept the MPO's 2000 apportionment plan which provides for an eleven voting member MPO Board with an additional voting representative from the City of Sebastian and an additional voting representative from the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners; and 2. That three originals or certified copies of this resolution will be provided to the Indian River County MPO. February 13, 2001 BK I!7 PG 060 48 af. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams as follows: Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Vice -Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Commissioner John W. Tippet Stanbridge who moved its adoption. The , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 13th day of February , 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Chairman Caroline D. Girin Board of County Commissioners I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared, Caroline D. Ginn and rnATRiciA ,P t ..,orc- , as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons descnbed in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this / 1 "L r , A.D., 2001. day of APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY: �i 4 7.1ac- William G. Collins, Deputy County Attorney A'+. fi.. Kimberly E. Massung MY COMMISSION # CC855436 EXPIRES July 15, 2003 BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INC F:\Community DevelopmentlUserslMPOIAGRMNTSWPPTM/M20oo Apportionment Plan IRCBCC Resolution.WPD February 13, 2001 BK 117PG061 7. U. Vero Beach Polo LLC - Final Plat Approval for the Polo Grounds at Pointe West PD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 2, 2001: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator obert M. Keating, AICP Community Development 1 irector THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director FROM: John W. McCoy 10 AA Staff Planner, Current Development DATE: February 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Vero Beach Polo LLC's Request for Final Plat Approval for the Polo Grounds at Pointe West PD It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 13, 2001 DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATION: The Polo Grounds at Pointe West PD proposes 46 single family lots and 6 tracts on 89.23 acres. The tracts will be used for stormwater. landscape and equestrian related activities. The development is a portion of the overall Pointe West TND (traditional neighborhood design) development and is located at the south end of Pointe West between 8'h Street and 12`h Street. The proposed plat is in conformance with the overall PD plan and approved preliminary PD plan for the Polo Grounds. At its regular meeting of August 8. 1999. the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plan approval for the Polo Grounds at Pointe West. Subsequently, a land development permit was issued for the proposed development All of the required on-site improvements have been completed however, some of the required off-site improvements that serve the project are not yet complete. These off-site improvements are secured through a separate developers agreement. The owner. Pointe West Polo LLC, through its agent, On Site Management, Inc., is now requesting final plat approval and has submitted the following: February 13, 2001 1. A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary PD plan 2. A certificate of completion for the required on-site improvements ANALYSIS: At this time. all of the required on site subdivision improvements have been completed. The applicant has warranted the utility improvements via a utility services bill of sale. Some of the required off-site improvements are not yet complete, including the paving of 12`h Street from the project entrance to 82nd Avenue. This 12'" Street paving and other required off-site improvements are guaranteed via an approved and secured developers agreement. The county attorney s office has indicated that the developers agreement provides adequate security to cover the developer's share of providing the required off-site improvements. The developer has been advised that no certificate of occupancy (CO) will be issued for any unit within the Polo Grounds until all required off-site improvements are completed and deemed acceptable. All applicable requirements regarding final plat approval have been satisfied. Construction of the off-site improvements will be inspected and accepted by the county, prior to the issuance of any (CO's) within this development. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis. staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final. plat approval for the Polo Grounds at Pointe West. A TTA CHMENTS: ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously granted final plat approval for the Polo Grounds at Pointe West, as recommended in the memorandum. 7. V. Su ervisor o Elections - Bud : et Amendment 010 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 2001: February 13, 2001 BKti7PG063 TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: February 7, 2001 SUBJECT: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 010 THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator FROM: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager Description and Conditions The Supervisor of Elections has experienced various unexpected costs associated with the 2000 General Election. As a result, the Supervisor has requested a budget amendment for $50,000 to cover these expenses (see attached letter dated January 31, 2001). Additional revenues from the Supervisor's office should provide about $35,000 of the shortfall. General Fund contingencies will provide the remaining $15,000 needed. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment. Distribution Kay Clem - Supervisor of Elections Attachments January 31, 2001 letter from Kay Clem Indian River County Approved Administrator Legal Budget Department Risk Management ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved miscellaneous Budget Amendment 010, as recommended in the memorandum. February 13, 2001 BK117pG064 TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jason E. Brown Budget Manager BUDGET AMENDMENT: 010 DATE: Februa 7, 2001 7. W. Modi ication o Concurrent Determination A Fee - Plannin s Division Fee Schedule Revision Item deferred. lication 7.X. Acce, tante o Invitation and Donation rom the Bahamas Ministr o Tourism or Emer ' enc Mana : ement Coordinator Nathan McCollum to Attend Their 511, Annual Bahamas Weather Con erence - Grand Bahama Island - March 28-A ril 12001 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 1, 2001: February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 PG 065 3 TO: Honorable Board of County Conunissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Douglas M. Wright. recto Emergency Services DATE: February 1, 2001 SUBJECT: Authorization to Accept Invitation and Donation to the County from the Government of the Bahamas for Nathan McCollum to Attend the 5`h Annual Bahamas Weather Conference Since 1997, the Government ofthe Bahamas has hosted an annual weather conference in order to provide their officials with the best meteorological information possible. Weather and hurricane experts from the United States and the Caribbean are invited to make presentations and also attend concurrent programs which will enhance their expertise. This year. the Government of the Bahamas has invited Emergency Management Coordinator Nathan McCollum to speak with a panel of guests about the Florida East Coast Region and how Nathan translates and extrapolates the scientific data into information the public can understand. The invited panel consists of Max Mayfield. Director of the National Hurricane Center; Dr. Robert Sheets, former Director of the National Hurricane Center; and Nathan. This is an honor for Indian River County Emergency Management to be presenting with two of the most recognized humcane experts in the world. The invited panel will be conducting two programs during the conference and I am informed Nathan will be allowed full participation in the conference. The information obtained by experts during other presentations at this conference will enhance our forecasting capabilities for the 2001 hurricane season. Per the attached letter, there is absolutely no expense to the county because the government of the Bahamas will reimburse all expenses, including transportation, lodging. meals. and conference registration. Because the cost reimbursement is by an agency other than local, state, or federal goverrunent, staff consulted with County Attorney Paul Bangel to seek advice on any potential county ethics violation. After a determination was made that this issue was not clearly addressed within the existing ordinance, it is being presented to the Board for consideration in order to avoid any possible impropriety. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests the Board authorize acceptance of the invitation and donation to the County from the Government of the Bahamas of the value of the travel and per diem, as noted and identified in the attached letter for Emergency Management Coordinator Nathan McCollum to attend the 5th Annual Bahamas' Weather Conference representing Indian River County for conference presentations. ATTACHMENTS: Invitation Letter From the Government of The Bahamas E -Mail Letter From BSMG February 13, 2001 81<117PG066 54 92 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized acceptance of the invitation and donation to the County from the Government of the Bahamas of the value of the travel and per diem, as noted and identified in the letter, for Emergency Management Coordinator Nathan McCollum to attend the 5`'' Annual Bahamas Weather Conference representing Indian River County for conference presentation, as recommended in the memorandum. 9.A1. PUBLIC HEARING THE OAKS OF VERO INC. - REIUEST FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR A 163 -LOT SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS THE OAKS OF VERO PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of January 11, 2001 using a site map (page 107 of the backup), an aerial view of the subject area, and the proposed plan (page 108) and recommendations: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator N HEAD CONCURRENCE: 77 A el Robert M. Keating, AICP 1 Community Development Dire tor THROUGH: Stan Boling, A.tCP Planning Director FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP\,) vv\ Senior Planner, Current evelopment February 13, 2001 55 BILI 1 PG 067 Yr DATE: January 11, 2001 SUBJECT: The Oaks of Vero, Inc.'s Request for Planned Development (PD) Conceptual Plan and Special Exception Use Approval for a 163 Lot Single -Family Subdivision to be Known as The Oaks of Vero It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 13, 2001 DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: On behalf of the Oaks of Vero Inc., Schulke. Bittle and Stoddard LLC has submitted an application for special exception use/conceptual PD plan approval for a 163 lot single-family development on 70.40 acres located at the northeast corner of 58t Avenue and 12`h Street. The subject property is an existing grove and is zoned RS -3, a zoning district which allows single-family development at a density of up to 3 units/acre. The west 35.7 acres of this site were the subject of the Brookfield/Soverel PD rezoning request which was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting of March 23, 2000. • Planning and Zoning Commission Action: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this application at its regular meeting of January 11, 2001 and voted 6 to 1 to recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. That there be a 70 -foot minimum lot width on interior lots (increased from 60'). '_. That there be a Type "B" buffer around the entire project except on 12th Street. where a Type "C' buffer (increased from Type 'D" on the west and a Type "C' on the north and east) will be allowed. That the PD design take into consideration preservation of certain trees in the vicinity of neighboring properties, specifically the large pecan tree near Mr. Roth's property and the large tree on Talmage Rogers' grove, and that such design locate and help preserve both trees. 4. That the existing grove included in the Phase II area be allowed to be continued during development of Phase I and that required perimeter buffering be allowed to be installed in the project's respective phases (Phase I and Phase II). After the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted a revised PD design that eliminates the 60' wide lots and meets the 70' lot width condition of the Planning and Zoning Cotnmission recommendations. The revised PD plan also incorporates the other recommended conditions, except for the condition that a Type "B" buffer be provided along the west (58th Avenue) property line. Staffs analysis contained in this report is based on the modified design and applies all of the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended conditions, including provision of a Type "B" buffer on the project's west perimeter. Thus, the post Planning and Zoning Commission meeting design is the current proposal now under consideration. February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 PG 0 6 8 56 nr • PD Project Process As a PD project. the process involved in review and approval of this proposal is as follows: Approval Needed 1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception 2. Preliminary PD Plan 3. Land Development Permits (LDP) or Waiver 4. Final PD Plat Reviewing Body PZC & BCC PZC Staff The applicant is now requesting approval of the first step. If the conceptual plan/special exception use is approved by the Board of County Commissioners then the applicant will need to file for and obtain preliminary PD plan approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. ANALYSIS: 1. Size of Development: 2. Zoning Classification: 3. Land Use Designation: 70.40 acres RS -3, Residential Single -Family (up to 3 units/acre) L-1, Low Density 1 (up to 3 units/acre) Number of Units: Phase I: Phase II: Total: 81 units 82 units 163 units 5. Density: Open Space: Phase I: Phase II: Overall: 2.32 units/acre 2.32 units/acre 2.32 units/acre Required: Provided: 42.9% Note: The open space will include private green area on individual lots. common green area including the tree preservation areas, and lake area. The applicant is taking open space credit for only 8 acres of the 18 acre lake. The smaller lots (60' x 70') are proposed to have a minimum of 30% open space, while the 80' wide lots are proposed to have at least 40% open space. Recreation Area: Required: 1.96 acres Provided: 5.56 acres February 13, 2001 BK I 7PG069 Below is a list of the recreation areas identified by tract and acreage: PROPOSED ACRES TRACT 'A' CLUBHOUSE AREA 1.02 TRACT 'B' GREEN AREA 0.14 TRACT 'C' GREEN AREA 0.13 TRACT `E' GREEN AREA 0.66 TRACT 'F' GREEN AREA 0.77 TRACT '0' GREEN AREA 0.07 TRACT 'H' GREEN AREA 0.07 TRACT `I' GREEN AREA 1.09 TRACT 'J' GREEN AREA 0.14 TRACT 'K' GREEN AREA 0.41 TRACT `L' GREEN AREA 0.46 SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN PATHS 0.60 TOTAL 5.56 ACRES Note: Recreation facilities include a clubhouse area, pedestrian system, and passive park/tree preservation areas. 8. Stormwater Management: As with standard single-family subdivisions, the proposed stormwater management plan has been given conceptual approval by the Public Works Department. The stormwater management plan will consist of a centralized lake with underground pipe to convey stormwater to a canal outfall on the south side of 12' Street. Final review and approval of the stormwater management plan will be accomplished through the land development permit process. 9. Utilities: The development will be served by the county water and sewer systems. To provide connection to the county sewer system, the applicant will construct a lift station. These utility provisions have been approved by the Department of Utility Services and the Environmental Health Department. 10. Traffic Circulation: The applicant is proposing a single 12ih Street connection that will be located at the mid -point of the development's 12th Street frontage. Internal circulation will consist of a single loop road with several short connecting roadways. Also, an emergency access connection to 12'h Street is proposed at the west end of the site's 12th Street frontage. Emergency Services has approved the location of the emergency access connection but will need to approve the final design of the emergency access prior to issuance of an LDP. The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved the internal circulation plan for the development. As part of the review process, the applicant submitted a traffic impact analysis (TIA) which has been reviewed and approved by the county Traffic Engineering Division. The results of the TIA indicate that an eastbound left -turn lane on 12`h Street is required at the project entrance, and that left turn lane is depicted on the plan. The TIA also shows that the projected 12th Street project traffic will be close to the threshold for a westbound right -turn lane at the project entrance. Based upon the project being close to the right -turn lane threshold and because of anticipated increases in 12th Street traffic, Traffic Engineering is recommending that a right -turn lane be made a required improvement for the PD. February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG 070 58 In order to construct the right and left -turn lanes at the project's entrance. several large FPL electrical poles will need to be moved further north, away from the 12`h Street pavement. The county is already cornmitted to moving some of these poles along the western side of the site to accommodate 58`h Avenue/12th Street intersection improvements. The applicant has begun negotiations with Public Works staff for a developer's agreement whereby FP & L poles on the eastern part of the site will be relocated at the same time and the cost shared in a manner that accommodates the county project and the developer's project. The developer will need to enter into a developer's agreement that guarantees the FP & L pole relocation prior to the issuance of an LDP. 11. Phasing: The applicant is proposing to construct the development in two phases dividing the project into an east and west side. Phase I will cover the west side and will contain the clubhouse, 81 lots, and the majority of the stormwater improvements Phase II will contain the remainder of the improvements and 82 lots. Perimeter buffers will be provided by phase, within each phase. The Phase II area is proposed to remain an active grove until the commencement of development of Phase II 12. Waivers Requested: Although PD zoning district parameters are flexible. certain standards related to uses, compatibility (buffering) infrastructure improvements, dimensional criteria. and open space areas are set forth in Chapter 915 (P.D. Process and Standards for Development Ordinance) of the county's land development regulations (LDRs) Based upon the proposed conceptual PD plan and the Chapter 915 standards, the proposed PD conceptual plan for the subject site contains the following elements as compared with the RS -3 zoning. Description RS -3 Criteria Proposed Interior Lake Front Lots Proposed South and West Perimeter Lots Proposed North and East Perimeter Lots Lot Size 12.000 sq. ft. 9.100 sq. ft. 10.500 sq. ft. 12.000 sq. ft. Lot Width Front Setback Side Setback Rear Setback Pool Frontward Pool Sideyard Pool Rearward Minimum Open Space per Lot Number of Lots Project Open Space Note: Decks and patios will be set back 30' from all project perimeters and 25' from the stormwater tract. February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 °G 0 71 Right -of -Way: The applicant is requesting that the minimum right-of-way width of 50' for curb and gutter streets be reduced to 40'. Along with that reduction, the applicant is proposing to provide a 10' easement on both sides of each street to form a 60' wide street and utility corridor. Staff has no objection to this request. 13. Environmental Issues: Uplands: Since the site is over 5 acres, it is subject to the native upland setaside criteria in section 929.05. While most of the site is citrus, a relatively small portion of the site has native trees and contains a small area of native habitat. The developer is proposing to preserve all (100%) of the native upland area plus other treed areas which do not constitute native upland habitat. Therefore, the applicant exceeds the native upland habitat preservation requirements. The treed areas consist mostly of palms and oaks which are located on the north and east sides of the site. The applicant has committed to establishing preservation tracts for most of the treed areas and has also committed to micro -sitting certain home sites and right-of-way areas to preserve trees. Through the preliminary PD plan review specifically site and provide preservation dbh, and for all palms and oaks within preservation tracts. approval process, the applicant needs to plans for all oaks on site that exceed 24" the proposed common green areas and Wetlands: The county's environmental planning staff has verified that a small wetland exists on the site. The applicant will need to obtain all county and jurisdictional permits to modify that wetland prior to issuance of a land development pernut for phase II. 14. Buffers and Setbacks: North and East (abuts single-family' residential areas): The applicant is committing to a 30' no build zone with a Type "C" buffer and 6' opaque feature along the north and east project perimeters. The applicant is proposing a 5 berm with half of the landscaping planted with the subdivision construction and half planted with the home construction. The exterior of the berm would be the i/z that is planted with the project. Staff is recommending a Type "B" and 6' opaque feature buffer along the north property line with all landscape material planted with the subdivision construction. Existing vegetation would be preserved and substituted for the berm and landscaping in some areas along the north and east perimeters where existing vegetation is creditable for meeting Type "B" buffer requirements. The vegetation to be preserved includes a stand of bamboo along the east property line and some oaks along the north property line. South (abuts 12`' Street): The applicant has committed to a 30' wide no build zone with a Type "C" buffer and a 4' opaque feature using a walUberm combination along the south property line. Again. the applicant is proposing that the outer' of the landscape improvement be planted with the subdivision improvements, while the interior i/ of the landscape improvements be planted with the home construction. Staff agrees with the Type "C' buffer. but all landscape improvements need to be constructed with the subdivision improvements as required improvements, and the opaque feature needs to be a minimum of 6' tall. February 13, 2001 BK 117PG072 60 • West (abuts lateral canal and 58th Street): The applicant has committed to a 30' no build zone with a Type "D" buffer and a 4' opaque feature, using a wall/berm combination. Again. the applicant is proposing to phase the landscape material as described above. The buffer is a required improvement which needs to be constructed with the subdivision improvements. The Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend a Type "B" buffer with 6' opaque feature on the west side. 15. Dedications and Improvements: 111 12th Street Right -Turn Lane: As indicated in the Traffic Circulation section. a right - turn lane at the project's entrance is recommended as a required PD improvement. The right -turn lane would not need to be constructed until Phase II. 12'h Street Left -Turn Lane: As indicated in the Traffic Circulation section, a left -turn lane is required at the project entrance. The left -turn lane is not required until Phase II. External Pedestrian System: The county's Sidewalk and Bikeway Plan requires an 8' wide pedestrian path along the project's 12`h Street frontage. The pedestrian path will need to be built or bonded out prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for the subdivision improvements. Internal Pedestrian System: An internal pedestrian system is required for planned developments. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along one side of the internal roadways, which is acceptable to staff. The sidewalk will need to be built or bonded out prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion. 12th Street Right -of -Way: The county's Thoroughfare Plan designates 12'" Street as a minor arterial roadway requiring 100' of right-of-way Presently, 100' exists for the west i/z of the project, and the county is seeking to acquire an additional 16' at the 12th Street/58th Avenue intersection through negotiated purchase. There is 50' of right- of-way for 12ih Street on the east' of the site. The applicant will need to dedicate without compensation an additional 10' to complete the 60' local road standard and accommodate purchase of the remaining 40' that is needed. The proposed plan does accommodate the future acquisition of the 40' on the east side and the 16' on the west side of the project site. Emergency Access: An emergency access connection to 12`" Street in Phase I has been approved by Emergency Services. A final design specifying width. surface material, and access control will need to be approved by Emergency Services and Engineering prior to issuance of an LDP. The applicant will need to build and obtain Emergency Services and Engineering approval for the connection prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase I. 16. Public Benefits: As part of the PD review, public benefits above those that could be required with a conventional development have been identified. One of those benefits is a 30 "no - build" area around the project perimeter. In a standard RS -3 subdivision, pool enclosures could be constructed as close as 10' to the rear property line, and residences could be constructed as close as 25'. The proposed 30' no -build area exceeds the 25' and 10' setbacks that would otherwise be allowed Another benefit is preservation of a 1.09 acre area that February 13, 2001 61 BK 117PG073 contains a significant number of the native trees on site which are located in the northeastern portion of the overall site. In addition, a right -turn lane at the project entrance can be required through the PD process, but could not be made a requirement of a conventional subdivision. Other benefits include increased perimeter landscaping, a pedestrian system, and required recreational areas, improvements which would not be required in a conventional RS -3 subdivision. 17. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Kingswood Estates, Sundowners, Rosewind Court/RS-2 South: 12th Street, Sub -Lateral Canal, Groves, Raintree Corners Subdivision/A-1, RS -3 East: Old Sugar Mill, AG Building/RS-3, A-1 West: Lateral Canal, 58th Avenue, Groves/A-1 RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the special exception use and conceptual PD plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to preliminary PD plan approval, the applicant shall submit a tree preservation plan. 2. Prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the applicant shall: a. Obtain approval from Emergency Services and Traffic Engineering for the emergency access design, and b. Revise the plans to reflect the changes to the buffers as outlined in the staff report, and c. Revise the plan to locate and accommodate preservation of the pecan tree near Mr. Roth's property and the large tree near Talmage Rogers' grove. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion, the applicant shall: a. Complete all required traffic and off-site pedestrian improvements for the respective phase and b. Install completely all required landscape buffers for the respective phases. Via the final plat, the applicant shall: a. Dedicate without compensation an additional 10' of right-of-way for 12`" Street to meet the minimum requirement of a 60' Local road right-of-way, and b. Establish an upland conservation easement, for the area determined to be native upland habitat on site, and establish preservation/green space tracts as shown on the conceptual PD plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2 Location Map 3. PD Plan set 4. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes February 13, 2001 BK 117PG074 62 inert An Ca Adnan Legal Budget Dept AAMC Mgr. • Approves 1 0 as to 1 rfr JJ_f 2/7// " 14-7 ; Public Works Director James W. Davis responded to Commissioners' questions on future plans for 12`11 Street advising that it is designated as a "minor arterial" in the thoroughfare plan and will be four -lane in the ultimate future when traffic requirements warrant the widening. It was established that the dedication of right-of-way would take care of future widening. Commissioner Macht was disturbed by the fact that this development is proposed for persons over 55, he would prefer it be for all ages. If the restriction remains, he stated he would not vote in favor of it. Director Boling advised that "over 55" was proposed by the developer, but is not a recommended condition or requirement. Vice Chairman Stanbridge was concerned with preservation of the trees on the subject project because of a comment of the developer that appeared in the newspaper. She wanted to make certain that staff would tighten the preservation of the trees. Chairman Ginn wondered about aeration of the stormwater and when the county would begin to require it. Director Boling advised that the final design had not been received and aeration is not a local requirement. Chairman Ginn and Commissioner Macht thought aeration could be a requirement, but Vice Chairman Stanbridge believed an 18 -acre retention lake would be very difficult to aerate and that littoral zones and vegetation would work better. Chairman Ginn thought the County should be working on the best management practices for our stormwater lakes. She has noticed that some around town are very well maintained and others are not. St. Johns River Water Management District has been asked to do this but they have not. She asked if she might speak with them again on this matter and there was no opposition. Commissioner Macht thought having a mosquito control district and stormwater and February 13, 2001 63 BK 117PG075 runoff impoundments does not really make a lot of sense. Director Boling advised that the County had previously had requirements for `/ acre plus lakes to match SJRWMD's requirements. Vice Chairman Stanbridge explained how proper design and management of small lakes will give problem -free water retention and wished Chairman Ginn "good luck" with SJRWMD The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Joseph Shulke, with Shulke, Bittle & Stoddard of Vero Beach, advised he is an engineering consultant and was present representing Pierre Pacquette and The Oaks of Vero, Inc. He first addressed the comment from the newspaper concerning trees and advised that his client did not want to get rid of any trees. The intent from the beginning was to save as many trees and natural resources as possible. He described the frustration of his client at the end of the Planning and Zoning Commission's meeting. Mr. Shulke believed the revised plan to be something that Mr. Pacquette, the PZC and the Commissioners could live with. In response to Commissioner Adams, Mr. Shulke thought the oaks would be helpful in selling the lots; the oaks are thought of as an asset, not a detriment. In the plat, the areas will be dedicated as parks. After further questioning as to how the preservation of the oaks would be guaranteed, Mr Shulke stated they will indicate on their permitting that they will put barricades or fencing around them and make sure it is implemented. During the pre - construction meetings with the clearing contractors, they will make it adamantly clear and would be willing to invite county staff to that meeting to emphasize it. Commissioner Adams was concerned about what would happen on the site, not at the pre -construction meeting. She asked if it would be okay to hang him "by his ear" if the trees February 13, 2001 6K 117PG076 64 are not preserved and Mr. Shulke responded "Yes, ma'am.". Community Development Director Robert M. Keating stated proposed changes to the tree protection ordinance were on the agenda later in the meeting and one of the proposed recommendations is to increase the financial penalties for removing protected trees. Vice Chairman Stanbridge pointed out the proposal included bonds or escrow accounts, but that is not the best solution. Commissioner Adams suggested that a staff member be assigned but have the developer pay for them to be on site during the clearing process, and Chairman Ginn and Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought that was an excellent idea. Commissioner Macht suggested the staff person could be treated like a resident engineer for that limited purpose. Chairman Ginn heard CONSENSUS and wanted that suggestion to be added to the proposed changes in the tree ordinance. Mr. Shulke continued and discussed projects in general in the county which typically are replacing citrus groves which generally do not have any valuable natural resources because the land has been stripped of its natural resources some time ago. In this instance, however, some valuable developable land is lost in the PD design. The developer, therefore, is being put at a disadvantage with his competitors. He then reviewed the intent under the PD concept vs RS -3. He addressed condition 2.b. in staff's recommendation concerning the buffer on 58th Avenue and wanted an explanation of the reason for their request of a "D" buffer. Chairman Ginn advised Mr. Shulke that he would not get the lesser buffer and advised that he move on, but Commissioner Adams wanted to hear what he had to say. Mr. Shulke presented reasoning in the hopes that the Board would allow a "D" type buffer on 4' berm on the west side of the subject site. If it proves inadequate, the developer February 13, 2001 65 BK 1 17 PG 077 will certainly increase it so as not to affect the lot sales. He also requested the Board to eliminate staff's recommendation for a right -turn lane on 12th Street. The analysis showed the developer did not exceed the County's requirement for a right -turn lane, but the traffic engineer recommended the developer put one in anyway. He hoped the Board would consider changing both in consideration of the application. Commissioner Adams inquired about the trees mentioned in condition 2.c., and Director Boling advised that staff was unsure of the location of those trees in relation to the property line which is why condition 1 asks for a tree preservation plan before the next stage in the process. Commissioner Adams felt that the right -turn lane should be there and she had no problem with a type "B" buffer on the west side. Tinda Condon, 1006 37th Avenue, had concerns about the traffic on 12th Street especially safety on the bridge over the canal at 58`h Avenue. She did not know how an emergency vehicle could get to an emergency right next to the canal. Director Davis advised that the 12`h Street bridge is going to be completely replaced with a much wider bridge. Staff is waiting for FPL to relocate some large power poles along 12`h Street near the bridge which is scheduled to occur in March. He advised that staff hopes to go to bid next month on the Phase II Kings Highway project. There will be a traffic signal installed at the intersection. David Millwood, 4920 13th Lane, pointed out the location of his property in relation to the development and stated that he would be directly impacted by it. He felt this development would not blend in with the surrounding areas which are the products of a certain style and atmosphere. He wondered what that would do to his investment, his way of life, and that of his neighbors. He felt it was the County's responsibility to control growth and that it be light growth. He was at the first PZC meeting when the developer was February 13, 2001 66 BK 117PG078 requesting RS -3 zoningwhich he understood was in the master plan. He was told that nothing could be done about it even though the homes nearby on 12`h and 16`h Streets are on 1/2 acre lots or larger. He understood that 16`h Street residents had fought and won against an RS -3 rezoning, so there is a precedent there. He disliked the idea of this development but would welcome something more compatible with open arms. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge, the Board by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Macht opposed) approved the special exception use and conceptual PD plan subject to the conditions set out in the memorandum and including an on-site inspection for the property clearing. 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - APPROVAL OF CLASS E CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY - WE CARE OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC., TO PROVIDE WHEELCHAIR AND NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL STRETCHER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Emergency Services Director Douglas Wright reviewed a Memorandum of February 5, 2001 and staff's recommendation for approval with the restriction that it be on a private pay basis: February 13, 2001 67 BM 117PG079 TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Honorable Board of County Commissioners James -E. Chandler, County Administrator Douglas M. Wright, Director of Emergency Services February 5, 2001 >u Approval of Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for We Care of the Treasure Coast Inc., to Provide Wheelchair and Non -Emergency Medical Stretcher Transportation Services. On August 31, 1995, the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board recommended to the County Commission that an ordinance be adopted to require a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (COPCN) for the regulation of wheelchair services. On Tuesday, September 19, 1996, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved regulations governing wheelchair services as outlined in County Ordinance, Chapter 304. Life Support and Wheelchair services. On July 11, 2000, We Care of the Treasure Coast was issued a Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity by the Board of County Commissioners to provide Baker Act transport service in the County on July 11, 2000, on a private pay basis only since We Care was not under contract with the County Transportation Coordinator (CTC). On November 29, 2000, We Care submitted an application for a COPCN to provide additional services under its existing Class E certificate in the County in the form of wheelchair and medical stretcher transport services. Pursuant to the Indian River County Code referenced above, the EMS Director has caused an investigation to be made regarding the application and the need for the additional non -emergency transportation service in the County. There are seven (7) other providers who hold a Class E certificate in the County as follows: Able Health Services Able Transport American Red Cross Association of Retarded Citizens Council on Aging Indian River Memorial Hospital Veterans Medical Transport We Care of the Treasure Coast Wheelchair Wheelchair Wheelchair Wheelchair Wheelchair Wheelchair Wheelchair Baker Act Private pay only Under contract with CTC Under contract with CTC Under contract with CTC Under contract with CTC Under contract with CTC Under contract with CTC Private pay only At an informational meeting, which was held on January 4, 2001, all current providers. municipalities, and interested groups were invited to attend for the purpose of receiving information about the proposed service and discuss the need for additional service in the County. At the meeting, the applicant provided eight (8) survey forms which alluded to a need for additional wheelchair transportation services in the County, although only one (1) of the forms indicated what facility completed the form and only one of the eight (1 of 8) was signed by an individual. February 13, 2001 68 BK 117 PG 080 The EMS Director concluded that additional information regarding public need would be required to formulate a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. A staff member was designated to personally contact twenty-nine (29) user facilities in the County and the following information was obtained. Wheelchair Service 1. Is your facility satisfied with the current wheelchair services being provided to you? Yes 21 No 7 2. Has your facility experienced excessive delays in transport? Yes 12 No 16 3. Does your facility feel that there is sufficient need to provide an additional wheelchair service? Yes 19 No 9 4. Would your facility utilize an additional wheelchair service provider? Yes 19 No 10 Medical/Comfort Stretcher Service 2. Does your facility feel that there is sufficient need to provide medicaUcomfort stretcher service? Yes 9 No 21 Would your facility utilize a medicaUcomfort stretcher service? Yes 9 No 21 (Some facilities did not answer all the questions on the survey which accounts for the discrepancy in some of the totals.) Most facilities and staff seemed to be satisfied with the current wheelchair services being provided. However, the majority felt there was sufficient need to provide an additional wheelchair service and most indicated they would utilize an additional service provider. A common issue verbalized by some of the larger facilities was related to having more choices of providers and small institutions were satisfied with the current level of service. Many of the facilities had concerns regarding the availability of current providers and cited examples that some close early in the afternoon and on weekends and scheduling requirements wherein some required trips to be scheduled up to two (2) weeks in advance. As to the medical/comfort stretcher transportation services, staff acknowledges that the majority of the user facilities indicated that there was not a need to provide additional service in this realm and they would not utilize an additional service. However, staff submits that since there is only one other provider in the County (IRMH) that is authorized to provide stretcher service, it would be useful to have another provider available if the IRMH unit was involved in another transport, maintenance, or the using facility wanted to utilize another service due to pricing or personal choice. It should also be noted that the City of Sebastian submitted a letter to the EMS Director advising that at the Sebastian City Council regular meeting on December 20, 2000, it was the consensus to support the application for We Care of the Treasure Coast to be granted a COPCN. Also, HealthSouth Treasure Coast Rehabilitation Hospital submitted a letter to the Board of County Commissioners in favor of the COPCN being granted to We Care. The required Public Hearing Notice was published in the Vero Beach Press Journal on February 5, 2001. February 13, 2001 69 3M 117PG081 Due to the fact additional work was required by staff regarding ascertaining the public need, the applicant agreed to a thirty (30) day extension beyond the sixty (60) days indicated in Chapter 304 of the Indian River County Code to hold the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: The EMS Director recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve We Care of the Treasure Coast application to provide non -emergency wheelchair services and medical/comfort stretcher services in Indian River County and authorize staff to amend the existing Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to include the additional levels of service as noted. Staff further recommends that the COPCN be granted for private pay clients only inasmuch as the applicant is not under contract with the Community Transportation Coordinator and governmental billing is not authorized pursuant to Section 302.17. ATTACHMENTS: Referenced application (HealthSouth letter included) Letter from City of Sebastian Certificate of public notice publication List of entities holding a COPCN The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved We Care of the Treasure Coast's application to provide non- emergency wheelchair services and medical/comfort stretcher services in Indian River County and authorized staff to amend the existing Class E Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to include the additional levels of service as noted; and granted the COPCN for private pay clients only inasmuch as the applicant is not under contract with the Community Transportation Coordinator and governmental billing is not authorized pursuant to Section 302.17 of the Indian River County Code. February 13, 2001 BRII7PG082 70 COPY OF CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TI IL BOARD 9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - PROJECTED RELOCATION COSTS Don Wright. President of the Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County, FL, Inc., reviewed his letter of February 7, 2001: yoG�>e'rr.% G 4sti .496141 RIVER CCI. HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL , INC P.O. BOX 644 • VERO BEACH • FLORIDA • 32961 0644 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Donald N Wnght President Jane L. Cammann 1st Vice President Howard J. Smith. M.D. 2nd lice President Eileen E. Derrick 3rd Vice President David K. Brower Treasurer Donna C. Starck Secretary Lillian M. Becker Alexander P. Cannon J Dianne Duff Barbara W. Evans Joanne D. Grdmes Jane B. King Richard H. Pippert—hi A. Vickers -aa Webb-Haskec Past President Nancy H. Benedict ADVISORY BOARD JoAnn M. Becker Elizabeth M. Bybee. DVM Fredenc L Cook Suzanne M Clever Peter A. Illing Laurie B. lodice Barbara Jean Smith HONORARY BOARD Mrs. E. Brand Beachum. Jr. Mr. William H. Cochrane Helen B. Doremus. DVM ivnti M Doremus. DVM '4r. Horace C. Ford Mrs. Dean D. Lockwood February 13, 2001 February 7, 2001 Chairman Caroline Ginn Indian River County Commission 1840 - 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Chairman Ginn: On behalf of the Humane Society's Board of Directors, I respectfully decline the Indian River County Commission's offer of $209,000 as total compensation for relocation of the Society's sheltering operation and request that the County Commission revisit the funding replacement cost issues at the Tuesday, February 13, 2001 commission meeting. While the amount of $209,000 helps to resolve some of the issues with land purchase, road paving and lift station replacement, it does not address the major financial loss to the Humane Society that being the replacement of the present shelter. We are requesting that the County Commission consider increasing this one-time funding request to $409,000 which will permit the Society to proceed with its construction plans with the additional support of private donors. The back up material presented to the County for the Tuesday, January 16, 2001 Commission meeting addresses our projected building replacement/relocation costs of $1,158,013. The Humane Society has based these costs on actual incurred expenses for site preparation and estimated building replacement costs. The present 8,000 square foot building was stated to be used as the facility for animals brought to the Humane Society by Animal Control agents, lost animals found by citizens and unwanted owned animals. Without the County's assistance, the projected replacement costs of this building will create a tremendous hardship for the Society and reduce the level of services that we can provide our community. In addition to the financial issues, the contamination problem has stalled the Society's building project since June of 2000. It is critical to our donors that we proceed with our building as soon as possible. While we understand the county has limited funding sources within its annual budget, we are hopeful that the county and Humane Societ; can work or a reimbursement plan to help remedy the replacement costs of our building. The funding that we are requesting from the county is Tess than ten percent (10%) of the total investment we are making to ensure we keep up with the future growth of our community. 71 OK 1 17 °G 083 Joan G. Carison Execunue Director Do. N Radabaugh Administrator Animal Center 4701 41st Street 561; 569-6030 FAN 561; 569-8188 Thanking you to advance for your consideration, I remain Sincerely yoyrs, i / Don Wright President We Speak For Those Who Cannot Speak For Themselves Member of The American Humane Association & Humane Society of the United States Dinh Shop 3445 20th Street 15611 5672044 Mr Wright clarified a point for Commissioner Adams concerning the percentages and dollar amount requested. Chairman Ginn thought the County would spend much more to provide the services that the Humane Society is providing to the county and supported approval of the request. Wayne McDunough spoke as the attorney for the Humane Society. He felt that no one could question the quality of service provided to the county over the years. He emphasized that the Humane Society did not want to be at the meeting asking for additional funds They had already spent $110,000 for expansion of their facility, but had to reevaluate due to the discovery of ground contamination. The Humane Society's Board established they could not remain at the contaminated location, but must relocate. He stressed $200,000 represents only 23% of the current fair market value of their current facility and 22% of the projected new building to house the animals. It does not take into consideration the $110,000 they have already expended on the current site. They are appreciative of the offer for $209,000, but that amount contemplated transfer of the 10 acres, payment for the lift station, and assistance to the paving costs, but did not include one cent toward the existing building nor the $110,000. The Humane Society feels they are being reasonable and fair and came before the Commission in good faith. There has been a very good relationship between February 13, 2001 72 BK 1 1 7 PG 38►� the two for decades. It is a partnership and the Humane Society provides services to the county as mandated by state law. He thought the county did not want to get into the business of animal control. The Humane Society needs the County's help and wants to continue to provide the vital animal services. In response to Chairman Ginn's inquiry, Assistant Administrator Baird advised that $1.7 million in sales tax had been set aside for the intersection at 4th Street and US# 1; it now appears the County will receive a State grant which will pay for the majority of that work. When this matter came to the Board January 16`h, it was a matter of money because he was not aware of this State grant. He agreed the Humane Society does a wonderful service for the County and there has always been a fine working relationship with them. Public Works Director James W. Davis addressed queries of the Commissioners as to the status of other roadway improvement projects. He advised that costs are running higher due to escalation of prices of petroleum products. The price of asphalt has increased 30%. Staff is working toward incorporating current figures in relation to cost estimating. He stated that the Kings Highway and CR 512 projects are completely funded and the County has recently received some help in funding the Oslo Road project. He specified there is not a big cushion on other public works projects. Commissioner Macht reminded the Commissioners that it was necessary to cut back on plans for both libraries (main and north county), and it was necessary to scrub work on another (south county) completely. Chairman Ginn wondered if the additional funds could be divided up between several projects. Commissioner Adams suggested the Board needed to have a report on all projects which they might want to look at before committing additional funds to the Humane Society. She did not want to rule out assisting their need, the only downside for the Humane Society February 13, 2001 73 BK 1 1 7 PG 0 8 5 would be time. Discussion ensued and there appeared to be CONSENSUS that a report on the capital projects from staff should be generated as soon as possible. Commissioner Tippin agreed to the need for a long-range study, but favored doing something for the Humane Society now. He believed this to be an emergency situation which was quite different from the other capital projects. He asserted a precedent would not be established since he was certain nothing else would be built on any old dumps. Commissioner Macht reminded Commissioner Tippin that one of the big hopes was to have a south county library, if only a storefront in the beginning. Commissioner Adams agreed that the perception of working in a building on land over contaminated water sources was undesirable and they do need to move, but the question is whether they should agree now to a Humane Society allocation or wait to look at and also consider the other capital project needs Chairman Ginn thought the Humane Society was in a bad position because they cannot sell the property as no one will buy contaminated property. She wanted to move forward with funding the additional $200,000; the County could not replace the service with the same dollars. Vice Chairman Stanbridge agreed with Commissioner Tippin that it was an emergency situation. She also agreed the Board needed to look at the big picture, but if it were County employees in a County building, the Board would move them off quickly, find another place, and help them reestablish. If the Board approves the request, Assistant Administrator Baird understood that the County would be given title to the contaminated property. Then the County would want to immediately lease it back to the Humane Society. Once the County has title to the property, it will be possible to move forward to determine the extent of the contamination and then February 13, 2001 BK I1 PG 086 74 move on with the remediation. In response to Commissioner Macht's inquiry for a funding source for the Humane Society's request, Assistant Administrator Baird advised that if the Board considered this a priority, and wanted to give an additional $200,000, it would be his recommendation to take an additional $120,000 from contingencies and $80,000 from interest income. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, to take an additional $120,000 from the contingency fund, and $80,000 from interest income, and grant the Humane Society's request for an additional $200,000. Under discussion, Commissioner Macht wanted to be certain that staff would be reporting soon on projected overruns for other projects and the cost to establish a south county library. Chairman Ginn thought funding will be needed for projects other than the library, such as the gun range and North County Park pool overruns. Assistant Administrator Baird interjected that funding for those projects seemed to be covered. He concurred that there are other projects and other commitments, such as the Gifford Progressive League's shortfall. There could also be road projects that might require additional appropriations. All County projects will have to be researched and updated. County Attorney Bangel announced that the folder of letters in support of the Humane Society will be placed on record in the office of the Clerk to the Board. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. Assistant Administrator Baird informed the Board that staff would like to proceed to February 13, 2001 75 BK Ii7PG087 a quick closing on the contaminated site with an immediate lease -back to the Humane Society until they are ready on their new site. Staff wanted to proceed with more on-site monitoring as quickly as possible. There was CONSENSUS to allow staff to move forward with a quick closing on the contaminated property and lease -back to the Humane Society. Chairman Ginn called a 5 -minute recess at 10:20 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:30 a.m. with all members present. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-0012 - YEAR-END GUIDELINES FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING AND PAYMENT BY COUNTY OFFICERS (CONSTITUTIONALS) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 12, 2001: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrato DATE: February 12, 2001 RE: A Resolution Setting Year -End Guidelines for Financial Reporting and Payment by County Officers At the request of the auditors, we are requesting the Board of County Commissioners consider adopting the attached resolution. JAB/Ik Attachment February 13, 2001 76 BK 1 I / PG 088 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED By Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2001-012 setting year-end guidelines for financial reporting and payment by County Officers. RESOLUTION NO 2001- 012 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING YEAR-END GUIDELINES FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING AND PAYMENT BY COUNTY OFFICERS. WHEREAS, Section 218.36(1), Florida Statutes (2000), requires each county officer to submit an annual report of his or her fees, commissions, and remunerations, to the board of county commissioners within 31 days of the close of his or her fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Section 218.36(2), Florida Statutes (2000), requires each county officer to pay into the county general fund all money in excess of the sum to which he or she is entitled under chapter 145 on or before the date for filing the annual report and WHEREAS, Section 218.36(3), Florida Statutes (2000), requires the board of county commissioners to notify the governor on the thirty-second day following the close of the fiscal year of the failure of a county officer to comply with the provisions of Section 218.36; and WHEREAS, there are times when, on or before the close of the fiscal year, due to disbursement schedules, a county officer is not in actual possession of grant money which has been approved and to which he or she is entitled; and WHEREAS, sound accounting principles recognize that accounts receivable in a fiscal year may not be received until after the close of the fiscal year, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, as follows: A county officer who, on or before the close of the fiscal year, due to disbursement schedules, is not in actual possession of grant money which has been approved and to which he or she is entitled, shall include such grant money in his or her report to the Board of County Commissioners in the fiscal year in which such grant is approved, showing documentation thereof and shall pay into the county general fund any amount due pursuant to Section 218.36(2), Florida Statutes (2000), within thirty (30) days following the close of the fiscal year. In the event such county officer does not receive such funds within thirty (30) days following the close of the fiscal February 13, 2001 77 Bpi IiPG089 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-012 year such county officer shall nevertheless submit the annual report to the Board of County Commissioners before the thirty-first day following the close of the fiscal year. Included with the report shall be a statement of any funds not received by that date and a statement that such officer will submit those monies not more than seven (7) working days from the date of receipt of those monies. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner John W. Tippet Aye Adams , and , and, upon being put The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 13th day of February, 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk CjJe Deputy Clerk February 13, 2001 4- 1 1 7 P6 090 • By Caroline D. Ginn Chairman Infan Riva Ca AGGroved Da le Admin trg -2 j1 .i 1 Lega! SUdael Debt. Risk Mgr. 78 • 11.A.1. WIRELESS MASTER PLAN & TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS REWRITE - CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of January 10, 2001 and highlighted the Scope of Services projected on the ELMO: TO: James E Chandler County Administrator DZON HEAD CONCURRENCE• Robert M. Keating, AI Community Developm 4 6 FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: January 10, 2001 •• nt Dirdc SUBJECT: Consideration of Draft Scope of Services for Consulting Services Request For Proposals: Wireless Master Plan and Telecommunications Regulations Rewrite It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 13. 2001 BACKGROUND: At its January 2, 2001 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an ordinance that established a six month moratorium on applications for new telecommunication towers. The main purpose of the moratorium, as stated in the adopted ordinance (see attachment #1), is to allow planning staff time "..to engage a consultant about the technical aspects of the telecommunications industry as they impact land use decisions". Consequently, the Board directed planning staff to come back to the Board with a draft RFP (request for proposals) and scope of services to engage a consultant to create a wireless master plan and re -write the county's telecommunications land development regulations (LDSs). Since January 2nd , staff has performed research and contacted other local governments that have hired consultants for services regarding wireless master plan development and wireless regulation re -writes. Based upon input from other local govemments, staff's experience with the last set of telecommunications workshops, and the resulting telecommunication regulations re -write in 1996- 97, staff has drafted a wireless master plan development and telecommunications re -write scope of services. The Board now needs to review the draft scope of services and give staff further direction regarding initiation of the RFP process. February 13, 2001 79 BK II7PG091 ANALYSIS: Staff has identified two Honda local governments that have each engaged consultants to help create a wireless master plan and a re -write of telecommunications regulations. To obtain input for developing a scope of services, planning staff contacted both local governments, reviewed their plans and regulations. and identified necessary consultant activities to include in the scope. The two local governments whose wireless master plan/telecommunications regulation projects which staff reviewed were the City of Lakeland and Alachua County. • City of Lakeland and Alachua County Experience When the City of Lakeland created a master plan and re -wrote its telecommunications regulations, it engaged a land use planner for about $40.000, and separately hired a consultant who was an RF (radio frequency) engineer and attorney. According to Lakeland planning staff there have been few new towers proposed within the city limits, and there has been no evident need so far to adjust the city's regulations or plan In 1999/2000. Alachua County engaged the services of a land use planner for about $150,000, and separately hired an RF engineer to conduct a more comprehensive effort for master planning and re -writing the county's telecommunications regulations. Both Alachua County and Lakeland used Krienes and Krienes of Tiburon, California as their planning consultant. Indian River County staff are also aware of another consultant, City Scape. of Coral Springs Florida, that provides services for preparing wireless master plans and re -writing regulations. The wireless master plan for Lakeland (adopted 1997) consists of a 40 page policy document that includes a wireless facilities inventory problems and opportunities statement, evaluation of existing regulations, policies on visually sensitive/avoidance areas (e.g. lakeviews, downtown area, residential areas), policies on airport and environmental factors, cost recovery strategies, and siting and design criteria. The plan is considered the basis for Lakeland's regulations, and was backed- up technically by an engineering and legal consultant. Alachua County's wireless master plan (adopted June 2000) consists of a 109 page document containing a total of 5 reports. The reports cover: problems and opportunities, a review of existing county regulations, policy recommendations. language for legislation and guidelines, procedures and protocols for siting personal wireless facilities, and recovery of planning and implementation costs from applicants. Alachua County s wireless master plan is intended to spell -out the types of personal wireless facilities that the county wants and where it wants them. It should be noted that Alachua County's plan and regulations re -write addressed personal wireless facilities and did not address telecommunications broadcast facilities (e.g. TV and radio towers, amateur radio towers, private dispatch towers). • Scope of Services The heart of an RFP is the scope of services. In regard to developing a wireless master plan and re- writing telecommunications regulations for Indian River County, it is staffs opinion that planning, RF engineering, and legal services are needed and should be specified in the scope of services Staff has drafted a scope of services based upon local expenence, Alachua County's experience, and concerns recently expressed by the Board. The draft scope of services (see attachment # 4 ) is intended to provide for a comprehensive process for developing a wireless master plan and re- writing regulations for telecommunications facilities. February 13, 2001 80 BK 117PG092 The work outlined in the Scope of Services is extensive. and includes the following summary of items. • Identification of problems and opportunities. • Inventor_y of current telecommunications providers, existing tall structures, and wireless facilities. • Estimate of current and future wireless services demand. • Analysis of existing structures, future demands, and technological alternatives to answer the question: can wireless service demands be properly accommodated without additional tall structures? • Facilitation of workshops and meetings to develop consensus on desired outcomes and goals regarding aesthetics, safety and other issues. • Development and presentation of a written and illustrated wireless master plan and a regulations re -write. As proposed. this scope of services includes activities that are necessary to ensure that the wireless master plan and telecommunications regulation development process is comprehensive and the result defensible. By using outside experts, the county can obtain the technical, market, and legal expertise unique to telecommunications and necessary to develop telecommunications regulations • Time Frames It is anticipated that the time required to complete the work activities scheduled in the scope of services will exceed the county's six month moratorium. For example, Lakeland's master planning and regulations re -write took 7 months and required extension of a 6 month moratonum that Lakeland enacted at the beginning of its process. Alachua County's process took 11 months. Once Indian River County completes the RFP process and selects a consultant, a more accurate timeframe for its planning and regulation re-wnte effort can be established. • Non -Affiliation With Telecommunications Industry In previous discussions, the Board has indicated a desire to use a consultant(s) that is not affiliated with the telecommunications or tower industries. If the Board desires such a "non -affiliation' qualification, then the Board should direct staff to include such a qualification in the RFP. It is staff's understanding that Krienes and Knenes and City Scape are considered non-affiliated with the telecommunications and tower industries. February 13, 2001 81 BK I 1 r' PG 0 9 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: (1) Review the draft scope of services, and direct staff to make any needed changes (2) Direct staff to include a non -affiliation with the telecommunications or tower industries qualification requirement in the RFP, and (3) Authorize staff to initiate the RFP process to engage consulting services for preparing a wireless master plan and a telecommunications regulations re -write. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Moratorium Ordinance 2 Excerpts from Lakeland Wireless Master Plan 3. Excerpts from Alachua County Wireless Master Plan 4. Draft RFP Scope of Services Note: The following are available at the Board Office: a complete copy of Alachua County's wireless master plan. ordinance and consultant planning services contract. Lakeland's ordinance and wireless master plan, and information from the Krienes and Krienes and City Scape websites. Director Boling asked if the Board wanted to have a non -affiliation qualification requirement and assumed that they did. Commissioner Macht thought the most important thing would be that the consultant be or have access to an RF (radio frequency) engineer. He believed it to be the crux of every argument the Board has gotten into and they have been defenseless in being able to advocate a different siting criteria than the telecommunication company says. Chairman Ginn was very pleased with what Lakeland had done and thought it would be wise for the consultant to have a legal consultant with specific training in telecommunications, and Director Boling agreed and that was why the Scope of Services specifically says that there are planning, engineering, and legal services required. Chairman Ginn especially liked a sentence from the Lakeland plan found on page 203 of the back up and read from it: " ... 150 -foot or 200 -foot mount may have a significant visual impact on a residential neighborhood a block or two away, even though the facility February 13, 2001 BK1i- PG0914 82 itself is located in a commercial or industrial district." She suggested adding "agricultural" since that is what the issue was in the recent agenda item that prompted the moratorium. Commissioner Macht added that it was the discontinuity between what was there, e.g., existing trees, versus a lattice -type structure. County Attorney Bangel cited a portion ofthe Florida Bar Rules, unless the consultant is a lawyer or law firm, legal services might have to be separate because you may not have a consultant who has attorneys on staff Commissioner Adams thought it most important to have the RF engineer because the County has Messrs. Bangel and Collins on staff, and Chairman Ginn felt that issuecould be deferred to make certain the area is covered. At the urging of Chairman Ginn, Director Boling explained the process that the consultant would perform, that is, to make sure the Board knows exactly what is out there, the opportunities, and that a consensus is formed of what the Board wants before the wireless master plan is actually developed. Commissioner Adams understood that only two consultants are known to perform and that there would be a committee to interview them after they have responded to the RFP. She was very concerned about the amounts paid. Chairman Ginn agreed it was important that the Board know the cost. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized staff to initiate the RFP process to engage consulting services for preparing a wireless master plan and a telecommunications regulations re -write, to include a non -affiliation with telecommunications or tower industries qualification requirement in the said RFP. February 13, 2001 83 BK 1 1 7 P6 095 11.A.2. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH AMENDMENT TO LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) REGARDING TREE PROTECTION Chief Environmental Planner Roland M. DeBlois reviewed a Memorandum of February 6, 2001: TO: James E. Chandler Count\ Administrator EM D.' •ART TENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: 4 G_. Robert M. 'eating. AICP Communis Development Dire or FROM: Roland M. DeBlois.`.a1CP Chief. Environmental Planning DATE: February 6. 2001 RE• Staff Request for Board Authorization to Proceed with Amendment to Land Development Regulations Regarding Tree Protection It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of Count\ Commissioners at its meeting of February 13. 2001. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Board of County Commissioners. at its meeting of Mav 2. 2000. directed staff to revie\\ county tree protection requirements. to hold a public workshop on tree protection issues. and to report back to the Board. At the May 2000 meeting. the Board indicated that staff should focus on revisions to strernIthen tree protection measures. but should also evaluate the adequacy of current penalties and enforcement regarding tree removal violations. To that end. staff has reviewed tree protection measures from other counties and municipalities. as \\ ell as information from such sources as the National Arbor Dav Foundation. the International Society of Arboriculture. American Forests. and Louisiana State University. On Decemoer 2000. start conducted a ‘vorkshop to obtain public input on tree protection issues. At the public workshop. staff -discussed a draft matrix of issues and proposed revisions to the County tree protection ordinance (County Code Chapter 927). Attached is a copy of the matrix and associated tables that have since been revised based on comments at the workshop. Staff is now requesting authonzation from the Board to proceed with amending the Count\ s land development regulations (LDRs) as described herein. Summary of Proposed Revisions Based on concerns expressed by the Commission and by participants at the workshop. staff has focused on the following potential revisions: February 13, 2001 84 BK 1 096 • Redefine specimen tree" to be based on specific tree characteristics vs. the current procedure. which is to require a special action of the Board to designate a particular tree as a specimen tree before anv added protection measures can apply. • Increase "specimen treeprotection requirements. • Clarify tree removal exemption categories (particularly the agricultural exemption). • Define a "critical root zone" for trees to be protected. with the radial size of the critical root zone depending on tree characteristics such as tree type (species) age. and health (condition). Increase penalties for illegal u-ee removal from the current S500 per tree to S1.000 per nee (for non specimen protected trees) and to S5.000 per tree (tor specimen trees). ANAi YSI! Adequacy of the existing ordinance The County first adopted its tree protection ordinance in 19S3: the ordinance has remained relatively the same since that time. In 1990. however. a significant change to the ordinance occurred when the Count. redefined "protected tree" to be more encompassing by reducing the size threshold from S" diameter to 4" diameter. The County has also taken significant steps to preserve comununiries of natne trees. via the County's native upland plant communities I5°0 set-aside requirement. as well as through the County s environmental lands acquisition program. In addition. the County has strengthened its landscape ordinance requirements over the years to provide incentives for the planting of native trees associated with new development. Notwithstanding the Countv's successes in protecting existing native trees and promoting the piannng of native trees. a number of tree removal violations this past year have brought attention to cenain inadequacies in the County's tree protection requirements. From a staff perspective. there are two main issues: (1) adequacy of protection of a trees critical root zone" from construction disturbance. and (2) adequacy of enforcement and penalties. Critical Root Zone Measured from the base of a tree, a "critical root zone" is a radial area that warrants protection from construction disturbance to ensure survival of the tree. The current tree protection ordinance identifies a tree "protected area" (comparable to a "critical root zone") as based upon the tree "species. age, site. condition of the tree, or soil condition. topography. means of protective barrier proposed. or other relevant criteria ... In no event shall the protected area be less than mt area measured jive 15) legit radially from the center of the tree at its base fatless expressly determined by the environmental planner that a smaller specified protected area may be established.' The problem with the current "protected area" as described is that the ordinance does not provide specific guidance on how to determine the appropriate size of the area. given a particular circumstance. To address that issue. staff has researched other ordinances and studies. and is proposing use of the attached tables. which contain specific criteria for determining the critical root zone. It should be noted. however. that by strictly defining how a critical root zone is determined. the current flexibility of the ordinance in establishing the size of the zone) will be lost. As a result. more trees may actually be reproved because of the loss of flexibility that nov. allows for attempts to save trees in "tight quarters." Nevertheless. -the new approach would result in better protection of those trees that are able to be saved in the context of development. Enforcement and Penalties As previously indicated. the County has had success in protecting native trees. The issue. however. is to reduce the failures. Although the majority of developers are diligent in their compliance .with county tree February 13, 2001 85 BK 117PG097 protection regulations, it is suspected that in some cases developers have knowingly removed trees illegally. whereby tree removal penalties have been seen as a "cost of doing business." On this point. staff is proposing that the fines for illegal tree removal be substantially increased, particularly for the illegal removal of "specimen trees.' Regarding enforcement. staff has limited resources and is not in a position to constantly monitor construction activity throughout the county. Rather. staffs approach has been to focus its monitoring on certain projects that are more "n-ee protection sensitive" than others. and to follow-up on tree removal violation complaints as timely as possible. Notwithstanding. there will always be an opportunity for someone who is intent on illegally removing trees to do so. RFCO\IMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners direct staff to initiate procedures to amend county land development regulations relating to tree protection. with revisions as summarized in the attached matrix. 4TT4CHIIFNTS 1. Draft mamx of proposed revisions to Chp. 927 Table 1. Relative Tolerance of Selected Species to Development Impacts 3 Table 2. Assessment of Relative Condition of Trees �. Table 3, Critical Root Zone Determination for Trees (based on tree species and condition) MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, to direct staff to initiate procedures to amend the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) relating to tree protection, with revisions as summarized in the matrix (in the backup) and that a caveat be included that in subdivision and sensitive clearing areas that the County have a staff member on-site, paid for by the developer, to supervise the clearing process. Under discussion, Vice Chairman Stanbridge stated that in any micro -siting someone is needed on site every minute, and Community Development Director Robert M. Keating indicated that he understood what the Commission wanted. Commissioner Macht wondered if it was known how many trees were within the boundaries of the project approved this morning, and he was reminded that there is not yet February 13, 2001 6K 1 1 7 PS 0 9 8 86 a tree survey for that property. Commissioner Macht wondered also if there was a question, could not the developer take the trees down and not be concerned about the fine he would have to pay. Mr. DeBlois specified that under the current ordinance, staff has the flexibility to review design standards and make recommendations whether the developer has an appropriate reason for removing trees. Staff, over the years, has tried to balance at what point do you give up trying to save a tree and allow it to be removed from the standpoint of giving it the room it needs to survive. As a result, attempts have been made to save trees but, in some cases, due to inadequate protected areas, the trees did not survive. Staff was proposing that the ordinance be more explicit about circumstances under which trees can or cannot be removed. It would give more direction from the start to anyone reading the ordinance leaving less chance for discrepancy or flexibility. Vice Chairman Stanbridge noticed the mention of specific species and questioned why native species were not specified, and Mr DeBlois responded that the intent was to recognize tropical species and to provide added protection regardless of their size. Director Keating pointed out one of the corresponding regulations that provides some protection is the native upland vegetation set aside requirement of 10-15% of the property; on a scrub property over 5 acres that would be applicable and a certain amount would have to be preserved. Mr. DeBlois advised that standard procedure, particularly on subdivisions, is to initially have the developer identify any existing native plant communities on the site in order to implement the requirement of preserving a certain percentage of it. Vice Chairman Stanbridge believed the County also ought to have photographs or videos showing the preservation/vegetative areas on record since nine times out of ten it is claimed that all the growth was non -natives such as Brazilian peppers. February 13, 2001 87 81( 117PG099 Commissioner Tippin stressed the absolute need to get the word to the backhoe operator or nothing will have been accomplished. In his 28 years of landscaping replacement experience, he has learned that onsite inspection and supervision is the only way to save the trees. He has seen it happen dozens of times even with drawing out plans and.. flagging the area or trees. Fines are inadequate in relation to property values and code enforcement personnel cannot be expected to monitor this since that department is already overloaded. Vice Chairman Stanbridge agreed and reiterated the absolute necessity ofphotographs or videos way up front. She added that a conservation easement which was part of a site plan was denuded. Of course, the response was it was "all peppers" Both she and staff knew it was not all peppers, but there was no way to prove it or fine for each and every tree there because they had removed everything right at ground level. Chairman Ginn thought that it was warranted to be put into the regulations especially after what has been done to Jungle Trail. Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought that Mr DeBlois would be bringing the Board a blow-by-blow description of what has occurred on Jungle Trail with the developers and vegetation there, and Mr. DeBlois advised he was planning to bring that to the Commission's next meeting. (CLERK'S NOTE* This item came to the Board at their March 6, 2001 meeting as 11.A.1.) Chairman Ginn was ready to call the question. but recognized a speaker from the audience. Gordon Michael, 2655 69' Street, requested that the Commissioners consider changing their minds about removing the Australian pines on Jungle Trail. He thought it would help the erosion problem and provide shade along this roadway which is being used for recreation. He reminded the Board that the Disney Resort offers a guided bicycle ride along Jungle Trail. As a farmer. he appreciates the Australian pines as wind -breakers, shade - February 13, 2001 BKII7PGI00 88 producers, and erosion -fighters. He also warned of the need for drainage or it will turn into `Jungle Canal". The Town of Orchid and Windsor have done a wonderful job on the north end. He was sad -to say the worst offender in that stretch was the State of Florida which had come in and removed everything from the last mile and a half. Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that these State -cleared areas will be replaced with oak trees and other native species. Commissioner Adams disagreed with Mr Michael concerning Australian pines. They have caused erosion along the Riverfront. They also have a shallow root system, their limbs fall easily in storms, and they affect the soil so that nothing grows around them. She believed it to be beneficial to remove Australian pines and replace them with good shade oak trees. Mr. Michael agreed that everything has pluses and minuses. His biggest concern was the promises of developers versus the reality. He appreciated that a backhoe operator will have someone to oversee clearing to answer to the Commission and be paid for by the developer. With the removal of so much vegetation, Jungle Trail is changing rapidly. He then reported that 25-30 dump trucks had been hauling in massive amounts of fill to a Jungle Trail location about 1/4 mile south from CR 510. He noted there was a berm about 6 foot in height. They were working on it before he came to this meeting. Director Boling confirmed that a lot of the landscaping is in the buffer, that there is a berm to the east of the buffer, and there will be additional landscaping to the east of the 30 feet. Mr. DeBlois advised that staff has been monitoring the work. There are actually three types of swaths along the Trail at Seasons: a fairly intact native hammock from which there was a minor hand removal of peppers, a swath that is preserved mangrove/wetland, and a swath from which Australian pines had been removed which will receive new plants. If February 13, 2001 89 BKI17PG101 there are reports that the berm is not east of the 30 -foot setback, he assured the Board that staff would take a look at it, but they will not ultimately be having a berm within the 30 feet. Mr Michael advised that where they bermed (right at the edge of Jungle Trail), everything was completely gone and there must be 500-600 feet of straight road just north of Sea Oaks where they had a construction road as of this morning. Since he had been at the meeting, he did not know what had been done, but the dirt and muck were being pushed right toward the mangroves and the water was breaking right over the barrier cloth. He also described the replanting at Sea Oaks as about knee high landscaping. Mr. DeBlois advised that Sea Oaks had not finished their planting. He suggested that this could all be discussed in greater detail during his upcoming report. Chairman Ginn thought there was a need to send someone from the County almost immediately to see what is being done and get some photographs, otherwise she would go herself Mr. Michael added that he was only telling about what he had observed this morning just prior to the meeting. • THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG 102 90 11.A.3. CRC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - REQUEST TO PAVE OLD WINTER BEACH ROAD SOUTH OF JUNGLE TRAIL (tabled at January 23, 2001 meeting) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 6, 2001: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator FROM: DATE: RE• MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE• !' Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development Dire Roland M. DeBloisaICP Chief, Environmental Planning February 6, 2001 or Board Consideration of CRC Development Company's Request to Pave Old Winter Beach Road South ofJungle Trail (tabled from January 23, 2001 Commission Meeting) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its meeting of February 13, 2001. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On January 23, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners considered a proposal by CDC Development Company to pave Old Winter Beach Road south ofJungle Trail. The paving of Old Winter Beach Road is associated with the proposed Carlton River Club planned development (located within the Town of Indian River Shores). Old Winter Beach Road, which is a County owned right-of-way, is designated as a 'scenic and historic road' in the County's comprehensive plan, therefore, the County Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC) has been involved in review of the proposed road paving design Although the HRAC had reviewed earlier designs of the proposed road paving, the HRAC had not seen or commented on the latest revised plans that were presented to the Board on January 23. Consequently, the Board voted to table the matter until the HRAC had a chance to review the latest design and make recommendations to the Board. The HRAC has since met and reviewed the latest design (see attached HRAC meeting minutes) This matter is now presented for reconsideration by the Board. HRAC Recommendation At the HRAC's meeting of January 29, 2001, the HRAC voted unanimously (4-0) to approve staffs recommendations on the latest revised road paving design (as presented to the Board on January 23), but with the following added conditions: 1. 2. The proposed 10' wide vegetated buffer will include the planting of (native) canopy trees. The roadway alignment will be micro -sited within the 70' wide right-of-way under the supervision of county (environmental planning) staff. 3. A detailed tree survey (of native trees) in the right-of-way must be provided for county review prior to any road work. February 13, 2001 91 BK 117 PG 103 RECO'NMFNnATtO r Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the (latest revised) proposed improvements to Old Winter Beach Road, and direct staff to issue a county right-of-way permit .for the work, with the following conditions (as presented to the Board on January 23, but modified to include the HRAC's recommended additional conditions): 1. The bridge tender's site will remain in public ownership at its historic location. 2. Public access to the bridge tender's site will remain unrestricted. 3. The roadway alignment will be micro -sited within the 70' wide right-of-way, under the supervision of county environmental planning staff, to maximize the protection of existing native vegetation and wetlands. 4. The 10' wide vegetated buffer will meet the planting standards applied to the Jungle trail buffer, including the planting of native canopy trees. 5. The developer will provide a detailed tree survey (of native trees) in the right-of-way for county staff review prior to any road work. ATTA(`HMFNT� 1. Location map/survey of existing conditions Latest revised cross-section details 3. HRAC 01/29/01 meeting (unapproved) minutes MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, to approve staff's recommendation. Vice Chairman Stanbridge mentioned a letter was received from the St. Johns River Water Management District advising that the 12 -inch well in that roadway is in the County's right-of-way, as follows: St. Johns River Water Management District Henry Dean. Executive Director • John R. Wehle, Assistant E ecutive Director Michael Slayton, Paan Bay Service Center Director 525 Community College Parkway, S.E. • Palm Bay, FL 32909 • (321) 984-4940 February 2, 2001 February 13, 2001 92 BR 1I PG 1014 Johns Island Water Management Attn: James Moller 1 Turtle Beach Rd Vero Beach FL 32963 Re: Winter Beach Well Authorization CUP# 2361 Dear Mr. Moller: Indian River County Commissioner, Ruth Stanbridge has indicated to the District that a recent survey of the Old Winter Beach Road showed a twelve -inch well located in the County Right -of -Way. A search of District files indicates this well is the Winter Beach Well listed as a ground water source in your permit #2361. Please be aware that prior to using water from a well on property that you do not own, lease or control requires written authorization from the entity in control of the property on which the well is located. I have been unable to locate in our files written documentation authorizing your water use from this well from Indian River County. To continue to use water from this source you will need to provide the required written documentation giving authorization for its use from Indian River County or provide documentation indicating the well is located on property that you own, lease or control. If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact me at 800 295-3264 when outside the 321 calling area and within the state of Florida, by email at tom_terrell@district.sjrwmd state.fl.us, or on my direct line at 321/676-6634. Sincerely, Thomas Terrell Water Resource Specialist Palm Bay Service Center Department of Resource Management RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2001 CLERK TO THE BOARD cc: PDS Palatka jVPC R. Burklew Indian River County Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge 1840 25" St., Vero Beach FL 32960 Roland M DeBlois, Chief, Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement 1840 25" St., Vero Beach FL 32960 William Kerr, CHAIRMAN MELBOURNE BEACH Dan Roach FERNANDINA BEACH February 13, 2001 GOVERNING BOARD Ometnas D. Long. VICE CHAIRMAN Jeff K. JenningNDs. SECRETARY Duane 011enstroer. TREASURER APOPKA MAITIAJACKSONVILLE William M. Segal Otis Mason Clay Albright Reid Hughes MAITLANO 5T AUGUSTINE EAST LAKE WEIR DAYTONA BEACH 93 BK I1 PG 105 Vice Chairman Stanbridge pointed out that SJRWMD wanted some written documentation. She advised this issue has nothing to do with the motion. Chief Environmental Planner Roland M DeBlois advised that in addition to the letter from SJRWMD, staff also received a letter indicating an effort by Johns Island to coordinate with the County at that time. He presented the letter to the Board, as follows: MAYOR FRITZ OI(NWIT VICE MAYOR: ROSERT SCHOEN COUNCIL: 0(0801 I, SUNNSLL ROOMY N. LANODALS JOHN C. Ak00NAL0 TOWN MANAGER: JOS[►N C. DORSKY • April 26, 1991 Mr. Jim Davis Director of Publio Works 1840 - 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Jim: • TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES 6001 NORTH A•1•A. NO.AN RIVER SHORES. FLORIDA 329e:. (407) 231.1771 FAX (407) 231.4348 The Town has reoeived a request from John's Island Water Manage- ment, Ino., franchisee, to construct non -potable water lines and sink a non -potable water well in the Winter Beach Road right-of- way. Sinoe the Town is responsible for Winter Beach Road, we will examine the plana and specifications to assure that it is in the public interest and conforms to the requirements of the Town. Since the county has indicated its interest in Winter Beach Road, I feel that you should be aware of the project and have the opportunity to comment on it from the county viewpoint. Enclosed for your information are documents describing the project. JCD:em February 13, 2001 BKI17PG106 94 Sincerely, oraky • It was established that it is an artesian well, within the County's 70 -foot right-of-way. and is used for irrigation by Johns Island. Vice Chairman Stanbridge felt the Commissioners knew the history about Old Winter Beach Road, a macadam road that was removed in total by the developer of Johns Island. Chairman Ginn asked that all the Commissioners be provided with a copy of the letter. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. (The Board approved the latest revised proposed improvements to Old Winter Beach Road and directed staff to issue a county right-of-way permit for the work, with the following conditions (as presented to the Board on January 23, 2001, which meeting was deferred, but modified to include the HRAC's recommended additional conditions) : 1) The bridge tender's site will remain in public ownership at its historic location. 2) Public access to the bridge tender's site will remain unrestricted. 3) The roadway alignment will be micro -sited within the 70' wide right-of-way, under the supervision of county environmental planning staff, to maximize the protection of existing native vegetation and wetlands 4) The 10' wide vegetated buffer will meet the planting standards applied to the Jungle Trail buffer, including the planting of native canopy trees. 5) The developer will provide a detailed tree survey (of native trees) in the right-of-way for county staff to review prior to any road work.) February 13, 2001 95 BR 1 1 7 PG 10 7 11.A.4. REPORT ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS AND RELATED ISSUES Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 2001 and used a Power Point R outline to aid in his presentation of information: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DI IO HEAD CONCURRENCE: ' obert M. eating, AICP Community Development Dir tor FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief. Long -Range Planning DATE: February 7, 2001 SUBJECT: REPORT ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS AND RELATED ISSUES It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting on February 13 2001. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On November 21, 2000. the Board of County Commissioners considered a request from the Palms of Vero for authorization to issue Industrial Revenue Bonds to be used to leverage other funds to construct affordable housing in Indian River County. At that meeting. the Board denied the request and questioned the need for additional affordable housing projects in Indian River County. To address that issue the Board directed planning staff to compile affordable housing information and report back to the Board regarding affordable housing needs and related issues. • Background Several years ago, the Board of County Commissioners had similar concerns. That led to an affordable housing workshop meeting, held on February 27. 1997. to review affordable housing issues. including affordable housing needs Participating in that workshop were the Executive Director of the Florida Housing Finance Corporation; a Board member and a staff member from the Florida Housing Coalition; staff from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing; the Director of the Indian River County Housing Authority; and staff from the County Planning Division. That 1997 workshop addressed many of the affordable housing issues raised by the Board at its November 21. 2000 meeting. Because the information and conclusions from that workshop are still relevant, a copy of the videotape of that workshop meeting has been put on file in the Board of County Commissioners Office. February 13, 2001 BKI17PG108 96 • Definitions Like many other bject areas. affordable housing has its own set of terms. and those have specific definitions. Listed below are many of the important terms used in this report and their definitions. Affordable Housing - Housing occupied by a household paying not more than 30% of its gross income for housing cost. Housing Cost - Housing cost for owner -occupied housing includes mortgage principal. interest. taxes and insurance. Housing cost for renter -occupied housing includes contract rent. Affordable Housing Dwelling Unit - A housing unit that has a market value less than: • two times the county's annual median household income for each income group: or A housing unit that has a monthly rent less than: • one twelfth (1/12) times 30% of 50% of the county's annual median household income for very low income households. • one twelfth (1/12) times 30% of 80% of the county's annual median household income for low income households. Affordable Housing Project - A project that contains at least 60% affordable housing dwelling units. Household - All persons, collectively. who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. Median - A value in an ordered set of values. below and above which there is an equal number of values. Vert/ Low Income (VLI) Household - A household with a total gross annual income less than or equal to 50% of the county's median income. Low Income (LI) Household - A household with a total cross annual income between 51% to 80% of the county's median income. Substandard Housing - A housing unit which has one or more of the following characteristics: (1) lacks complete plumbing facilities or (2) lacks any heating facilities: or (3) has sufficient structural damage that it does not meet minimum housing code requirements. EXISTING CONDITIONS To assess the need for affordable housing in Indian River County, two elements must be considered. One is affordable housing demand, while the other is affordable housing supply. Estimating present supply and current demand requires making assumptions and using various data sources. The most comprehensive and complete source of housing data for Indian River County is the decennial census. While certain information, such as total number of units and total population. is estimated on an annual basis and is generally accurate because of the data sources, information on housing conditions, tenure, occupancy, and other factors is not generally available from sources other than the census. In terms of having accurate. reliable, up-to-date housing information for Indian River County, this is not a good time. Although the 2000 census was conducted almost a year ago, those data are not yet available. Consequently, the latest available census information is more than eleven years old. Despite the fact that 1990 census data are now out of date, this report uses those data as well as more recent data, where available. Even though the 1990 census data are not applicable now in terms of absolute numbers, they are helpful in terms of trends and characteristics. February 13, 2001 97 BK 17 PG 109 • Unmet Affordable Housing Demand There are five components of unmet affordable housing demand. These are• • households paying more than 30% of their income for housing cost • households living in substandard units • households living in overcrowded conditions • households whose members work in Indian River County but cannot afford to live in the county • homeless Based on analysis of available housing data. it is estimated that current unmet affordable housing demand is approximately 12,000 housing units. This includes 6,420 owner -occupied and 4,971 renter -occupied households with incomes less than $35.000 who pay more than 30% of their income for housing costs; 622 households living in substandard housing units; 1,016 households living in crowded conditions; and 328 homeless households. While those numbers total 13.357, there is most likely some overlap between those categories; for example. a family may live in a substandard unit and pay more than 30% of its income for housing. To account for that overlap, the 13,357 number was reduced by 10%, resulting in a total net demand of about 12.000. The 12 000 does not include the number of people who work in the county but cannot afford to live in the county. Each of the affordable housing demand categories is discussed in more detail below. ° Housing Cost Burden The following table from the 1990 census identifies the number and percentage of owner -occupied and renter occupied households that in 1990 were paying more than 30% of their income for housing In the higher income categories, it may indicate a personal choice to pay more than 30% of household income for housing; however, for the very low and low income households paying more than 30% of their income for housing. cost is a burden. TABLE 1 HOUSEHOLDS PAYING MORE THAN 30% OF THEIR INCOME FOR HOUSING COST OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS 1990 HOUSEHOLD INCOME ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF HOUSING COST # OF HOUSEHOLDS PAYING MORE THAN 30% OF THEIR INCOME FOR HOUSING COST CUMULATIVE TOTAL % OF TOTAL SPECIFIED OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS HOUSEHOLDS WITH AFFORDABILITY PROBLEM (Housing Cost Burden) Less than 10.000 Less than 5250 988 988 524 V S10.000419.999 3250-55(X) 456 1.444 7.66 V $20.000-$34.999 $500-$875 947 1391 12.68 535.0(0449.999 $875-51.125 345 2.736 14.51 Over 550.000 More than 51.125 454 3.190 16.92 otal owner -occupied housing units = 18.848 units Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing As indicated in Table 1, 1,114 or 7.66% of the 1990 owner -occupied households with incomes less than $20.000 were paying more than 30% of their income for housing costs. In 1990. the county's median household income was S28.961. With a $28.961 median household income, the upper limit February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG 110 98 of income for low income households was $23.168. Because the census provides information only in specific income ranges. it is not possible to determine exactly how many 1990 low income. owner households paid more than 30% of their income for housing. Using the under S20.000 ranges reflected in Table 1 provides the conservative estimate of 1.444 low income households with affordability -problems in 1990. HOUSEHOLDS PAYING MORE TABLE 2 THAN 30% OF THEIR INCOME FOR RENT RENTER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS 1989 HOUSEHOLD INCOME Less than 10.000 510.000-$19.999 520.000-$34.999 S35.000 -S49.999 Over S50.000 ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF HOUSING COST Less than $250 $250-$500 3500-S875 S875-$1.125 More than $1.125 # OF HOUSEHOLDS PAYING MORE THAN 30% OF THEIR INCOME FOR HOUSING COST 1.326 1.690 603 91 28 Total renter -occupied units = 9 418 units CUMULATIVE TOTAL 1.326 3.016 3.619 3.710 3.738 % OF TOTAL SPECIFIED RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS 14.07 32.02 38.42 39.39 39.68 Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing As indicated in Table 2, 3.016 or 32.02% of the 1990 renter occupied households with an income Tess than $20.000 were paying more than 30% of their income for rent Assuming that the percentage of low income households with a housing affordability problem stayed constant from 1990 to 2000 the total low income. renter and owner households in 2000, based on the factored census data would be approximately 4.500. This number is significantly less than the more recent estimates by the Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing at the University of Flonda. Tables 3 and 4, from the Affordable Housing Needs Assessment report, by the University of Florida, Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing, identify the number of existing renter and owner households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing HOUSEHOLDS WITH AFFORDABILITY PROBLEM J TABLE3 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING COST BURDEN NUMBER AND HOUSEHOLDS PAYING 30% OR MORE OF THEIR INCOME FOR HOUSING COSTS BY INCOME RANGE 2000 Income Range Owner Households Renter Households 2000 2000 Less than S10.000 2.497 2.078 510.000-$19.999 2.072 '_.156 $20.000-$34.999 1.851 737 $35.000-549.999 608 116 More than 350.000 787 38 TOTAL 1 7.815 5.125 February 13, 2001 99 B1(117PG111 TABLE 4 NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH INCOMES LESS THAN 535,000 PAYING MORE THAN 30% OF THEIR INCOME FOR HOUSING COSTS Source: University of Honda. Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing Table 4 identifies the housing cost burden among very low and low income households. Even though the affordability problem exists in both owner occupied and renter occupied households, there are more affordability problems among renter occupied households than among owner occupied households. Overall, more than 18% of the owner occupied households are paying over 30% of their income for housing cost. For renter occupied households this percentage is over 43%. While there is a significant difference between the factored census figures of low and very low income households with affordability problems and the Shimberg Centers estimates, the important fact is that each source indicates a significant housing affordability problem. In the near future, 2000 census data will provide more reliable information. ° Homeless Households According to the Indian River County Continuum of Care planning office, there are currently about 328 homeless families in the county. Often an unrecognized component of the affordable housing problem. the homeless represent the most extreme example of housing problems. • ° Sub -standard Housing Units and Overcrowded Conditions According to the 1990 Census. 622 of the county's housing units (1.4% of the total) were considered to be sub -standard in 1990. These were units that lacked plumbing facilities (206) and lacked heating facilities (456) Also, 1,016 households in 1990 were living in overcrowded conditions. Overcrowded units are defined as units having 1.01 or more persons per room. Using the census definition of sub -standard housing significantly underestimates the number of sub- standard housing units in the county. Based upon various projects undertaken by staff. including the Gifford Small Area Plan existing conditions inventory, community development block gram work in Wabasso, general code enforcement, and others. there appear to be more sub -standard units than reflected by the census data. ° People Living Outside of Indian River County Even though there are no statistical data on the number of low and very low income people who work in Indian River County but cannot afford to live in the county. these people exist and contribute to overall affordable housing demand. These people usually live in St. Lucie County or Brevard County and commute to work. February 13, 2001 100 BK 1 1 7 PG 1 12 2000 Total # of Owner Households 34.823 Total # of Renter households 11.514 # of Owner households paying more than 30% of their income for housing costs 6420 % of Owner households paying more than 30% of their income for housing costs 18.43% # of Renter households paving more than 30% of their income for housing costs 4.971 of Renter households paving more than 30% of their income for housing costs 43.17% Source: University of Honda. Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing Table 4 identifies the housing cost burden among very low and low income households. Even though the affordability problem exists in both owner occupied and renter occupied households, there are more affordability problems among renter occupied households than among owner occupied households. Overall, more than 18% of the owner occupied households are paying over 30% of their income for housing cost. For renter occupied households this percentage is over 43%. While there is a significant difference between the factored census figures of low and very low income households with affordability problems and the Shimberg Centers estimates, the important fact is that each source indicates a significant housing affordability problem. In the near future, 2000 census data will provide more reliable information. ° Homeless Households According to the Indian River County Continuum of Care planning office, there are currently about 328 homeless families in the county. Often an unrecognized component of the affordable housing problem. the homeless represent the most extreme example of housing problems. • ° Sub -standard Housing Units and Overcrowded Conditions According to the 1990 Census. 622 of the county's housing units (1.4% of the total) were considered to be sub -standard in 1990. These were units that lacked plumbing facilities (206) and lacked heating facilities (456) Also, 1,016 households in 1990 were living in overcrowded conditions. Overcrowded units are defined as units having 1.01 or more persons per room. Using the census definition of sub -standard housing significantly underestimates the number of sub- standard housing units in the county. Based upon various projects undertaken by staff. including the Gifford Small Area Plan existing conditions inventory, community development block gram work in Wabasso, general code enforcement, and others. there appear to be more sub -standard units than reflected by the census data. ° People Living Outside of Indian River County Even though there are no statistical data on the number of low and very low income people who work in Indian River County but cannot afford to live in the county. these people exist and contribute to overall affordable housing demand. These people usually live in St. Lucie County or Brevard County and commute to work. February 13, 2001 100 BK 1 1 7 PG 1 12 • Affordable Housing Supply For purposes of this report, affordable housing supply is the number of housing units which are subsidized with government funds. The countywide estimate of the current affordable housing supply using that definition is 2,253 units. There are another 239 units either under consideration for approval or under construction which brings the total to 2.492 units. o Number of Assisted and Subsidized Housing Units Like affordable housing demand, affordable housing supply. in this case subsidized units. can be divided into two categories. These are rental units and owner units. The rental units can further be divided into units within subsidized multi -family rental projects and individual units subsidized through vouchers. o Subsidized Rental Projects Countywide. the most visible affordable housing units are within subsidized. multi -family rental projects. Most of these projects were constructed within the last few years and were subsidized from one or more of the following programs. EiMm • Farmers Home Administration • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) • State Bond Program Totaling 1.456 units (60 of which are single-family), these projects are located throughout the county. Table 5 identifies those projects. The following table provides a list of subsidized housing units in the unincorporated portion of the county. TABLES SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNINCORPORATED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY February 13, 2001 101 BI( 1I7PGII3 MAP # PROJECT NAME NUMBER OF UNITS TYPE OF SUBSIDY YEAR BUILT I Victory Park 100 Farmers Home Administration 1989 Sunset Apartments 36 LIHTC (Low Income Housing Tax Credit) 1997 a Orangewood Park 100 Farmers Home Administration 1992 4 Gifford Grove 60 (single-family) LIHTC 95/96 5 Indian River Apartments 180 LIHTC 1994 6 Kyles Run 200 LIHTC 1997 7 Gardinia Gardens 80 HUD Project/Elderly Housing Project 1998 8 River Park Place 144 LIHTC/Elderly Housing Project 1998 9 Lindsey Gardens Phase I 96 LIHTC 1998 10 The Club at Vero 184 (some units under construction) - State Bond Program/ Elderly Housing Project 1998 11 woods of Vero 176 LIHTC 2000-01 February 13, 2001 101 BI( 1I7PGII3 Total Multi -Family Units: Total Single -Family Units: 1.396 60 ° Subsidized Rental Units Besides subsidized rental projects, there are individual subsidized rental units within the county. These are units whose residents receive a housing voucher or payment from the Section 8 program. Administered by the Indian River Housing Authority, the Section 8 program subsidizes a portion of a qualifying household's rent, with the amount of the subsidy varying with the household s income. Currently, 267 households receive Section 8 assistance. ° Subsidized Owner Units In addition to the subsidized rental units within the county, there are subsidized owner -occupied units comprising the affordable housing supply. These are primarily units funded through the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program. Besides SHIP subsidized units, there are also owner -occupied units approved for construction through the HOME program. As structured, the County's SHIP program provides assistance primarily to low Income and very low income households primarily through low or no interest, deferred payment, subordinated loans for downpayment/closing cost and/or rehabilitation assistance. As indicated in Table 6. 454 households have received SHIP assistance since the FY 92-93 inception of the program. Like the SHIP program. the HOME program leverages private mortgage sources and provides downpayment/closing cost assistance to qualifying households. Currently, 67 HOME funded units are approved, but not constructed. TABLE 6 SHIP PROGRAM REPORT 111111 1119111II I EIS Mill • 2saoo0.t70 I8.9'_ 1113 MUM, • 63'_.136.00 19 2!1111111111111.111 6.90 62.455.00 1111111111111111111MEI Mill 6.76 .. 903.723.00l11111111111111111111111 .000 749.773.00 5 19 • 0010.01 YTD =111 • 1.205.592.00 11111111111111111 I6 OTA L 1•1111.111111111111•1111112.50 • 5.429.452.00 SHIP funds mainly utilized for: Do wnpavmendclostng cost loan assistance. Rehabilitation loan asststancect tee eassistance_ 1.81 • Affordable Housing Need Based on the estimate of unmet affordable housing demand and affordable housing supply, affordable housing need can be estimated. With unmet affordable housing demand estimated e at 12,000 units and affordable housing supply estimated at approximately 2 500 units, overall affordable housing need can be estimated at approximately 9.500 units. February 13, 2001 BK 117 PGII14 TABLE 8 Demand amir Current numbcr of owner -occupied households with incomes less than 535,000 paying more tha housing costs. - Current number of renters with incomes less than 535,000 paving more than 30% of their income Number of 1990 sub -standard housing units Number of 1990 over -crowded housing units Estimated number of homeless (amities provided by IRC Continuum of Care office Number of people working in the county but living outside of the county Subtotal Estimated Overlap f IO%) Total (Net) Affordable Housing Demand n 30% of their income for for housing costs Number of subsidized MF housing units Number of subsidized SF housing units Number of SHIP assisted SF housing units Number of Section 8 rental assistance vouchers Number of subsidized MF housing units in Sebastian Subtotal Number of SF housing units application under consideration Number of MF housing units to be constructed Total Affordable Housing Supply 6.420 4.971 622 1.016 328 Unknown 13357 1.335 12,0=2 1.396 60 454 267 67 2.253 172 76 2,492 As indicated in the unmet affordable housing demand section of this report. most of the affordable housing need consists of households paying more than thiny percent of their incomes for housing. While some of these households may pay only slightly more than thirty percent of their income for housing and therefore do not have a significant housing problem, other households pay a higher percentage and have a more significant housing problem. Also important to consider is that the affordable housing need estimate does not include households whose members work in the county yet do not live here because they cannot afford to. ° Other Affordable Housing Need Indicators While the housing need estimates noted above are based upon census data, University of Florida Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing estimates, and other sources of housing data, there are other indicators of affordable housing need in the county These indicators include waiting lists at affordable housing projects and at the Indian River County Housing Authority, unfunded SHIP applications, and median income/median housing cost comparisons. Waiting Lists To determine occupancy rates for existing affordable housing surveyed those projects in December, 2000 and January, 2001. are generally 100% occupied. There are occasional vacancies relate to normal turnover applicable to all rental projects. projects in the county, planning staff The results indicate that the projects in some projects. but those primarily Also important to note is that most of the projects have tenant restrictions. Some are limited to elderly households; some are required to have a minimum number of households below a certain income level (such as 50% or the meolan); and all must rent to tenants who make little enough to meet income qualifications, yet enough to pay the rent. Most of the projects also have other qualification criteria such as credit, employment, and others. February 13, 2001 103 BKtI7PG115 TABLE 7 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING PROJECTS OCCUPANCY AND RESIDENT INFORMATION ource: Indian River County Planning Survey Table 7 shows that at the time of the survey there were 263 households on waiting lists at the county's affordable housing projects that responded to the survey. This includes those on the Housing Authority's Victory Park and Orangewood Park waiting lists It does not include those households on the Housing Authority's Section 8 voucher program waiting List. There were another 164 households on the Section 8 waiting list. The affordable housing project waiting lists confirm that there is a need for additional affordable housing in the county. Staffs affordable housing survey also identified some of the characteristics of that need As shown in Table 7, 62% of the renters in the county's affordable housing projects are female headed households many with children and others elderly. In terms of employment. many of the affordable housing project tenants work in the retail or service industries: some are teachers, nurses, and police officers. SHIP Program Demand Since its inception in FY 92-93. the SHIP program has received increasing amounts of funding and increasing numbers of applications. In each of the last two years, there have been a number of unfunded SHIP applications despite a significant increase in SHIP program funds. Also in each of the last two years no additional SHIP applications were accepted after the initial application period Based upon estimates of total -SHIP money expected from the state, there are approximately 50 SHIP applicants who will not be funded this fiscal year. If SHIP applications had been accepted for the entire fiscal year. that number would be significantly higher Like the affordable housing project waiting lists, the unfunded SHIP applications provide another indicator of housing need in the county. Median Family Income/Median Housing Cost Another indicator of housing affordability is the relationship between the county's median family income and the county's median housing cost. Currentls. the county's median family income is February 13, 2001 Project Name Are all Units in the Project Occupied Number on Waiting List M of Residents Residents Sex Male Female Gardenia Garden Yes 14 81 16 65 Lindsey Gardens Yes 6 100 25 75 River Park Place Yes 20 155 45 110 Indian River Apartments Yes 75 348 133 215 Kyles Run Apartments 3 vacant (2 bedroom apts.) 32 (waiting for 1 bedroom apt.) 498 224 - 274 Sunset Apartments Yes 8 35 15 20 Gifford Grove No n/a 127 87 140 Victory Park 13 vacant, pending application approval 60 109 32 77 Orangewood Park 7 vacant. pending application approval 48 273 122 151 Total 263 1826 699 1127 ource: Indian River County Planning Survey Table 7 shows that at the time of the survey there were 263 households on waiting lists at the county's affordable housing projects that responded to the survey. This includes those on the Housing Authority's Victory Park and Orangewood Park waiting lists It does not include those households on the Housing Authority's Section 8 voucher program waiting List. There were another 164 households on the Section 8 waiting list. The affordable housing project waiting lists confirm that there is a need for additional affordable housing in the county. Staffs affordable housing survey also identified some of the characteristics of that need As shown in Table 7, 62% of the renters in the county's affordable housing projects are female headed households many with children and others elderly. In terms of employment. many of the affordable housing project tenants work in the retail or service industries: some are teachers, nurses, and police officers. SHIP Program Demand Since its inception in FY 92-93. the SHIP program has received increasing amounts of funding and increasing numbers of applications. In each of the last two years, there have been a number of unfunded SHIP applications despite a significant increase in SHIP program funds. Also in each of the last two years no additional SHIP applications were accepted after the initial application period Based upon estimates of total -SHIP money expected from the state, there are approximately 50 SHIP applicants who will not be funded this fiscal year. If SHIP applications had been accepted for the entire fiscal year. that number would be significantly higher Like the affordable housing project waiting lists, the unfunded SHIP applications provide another indicator of housing need in the county. Median Family Income/Median Housing Cost Another indicator of housing affordability is the relationship between the county's median family income and the county's median housing cost. Currentls. the county's median family income is February 13, 2001 $47.700. With the county's median family income at $47.700, the upper end of the low income range is $38,160. Very low income households are those with incomes below $23.850. According to the Indian River County Board of Realtors. the median price of housing units sold in the county in 2000 was $112.000. This includes both new and existing housing units. Based upon the commonly accepted standard that a household can afford a housing unit whose cost is approximately twice its annual income. it is estimated that the low income households with the highest income can afford a house of $76.320, while the highest income very low income households can afford a housing unit costing only $47,700. To afford to purchase a house selling for the county's median price, a household would need an income of $56.000. an amount more than 30 percent higher than the top of the low income range. Table 9 shows the county's 1980 and 1990 median monthly housing costs and median household incomes in those years. As shown in Table 9. the median housing cost increased at a faster rate than the median household income from 1980 to 1990. It is likely that 2000 census data will show a similar trend of incomes rising slower than housing costs. TABLE 9 COMPARISON OF MEDIAN MONTHLY HOUSING COSTS AND MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOMES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1980 AND 1990 Housing Indicators 1980 1990 Median Monthly Housing Cost towner-occupmd) Median Household Income Source: U.S. Census Bureau. 1980 and 1990 ANALYSIS 5331 515.072 5666 % Increase 101 528.961 92 As indicated in the existing conditions section of this report. the private sector is not meeting the affordable housing needs ofindian River County. That, however, is not unique to this area. There are similar affordable housing problems at both the state and national levels. There are a number of reasons for the affordable housing problem. One reason is that housing cost has been rising faster than income levels. To an extent. local government is one reason that housing costs are higher. Because of zoning restrictions, subdivision requirements, building code provisions. impact fees. and other regulations, housing costs are higher. Also, land costs, building material costs. labor costs, and financing, all add to the cost of new housing units On the income side of the housing affordability issue. there are similar problems. One is that there are many low-paying jobs in the county. Many of these are in the agriculture and service industries. Another problem is evident from reviewing the demographic makeup of the county's affordable housing projects. As indicated in Table 7, the majority of tenants in the county's affordable housing projects are female -headed households. These households will generally have lower incomes and more affordability problems. February 13, 2001 105 BKII7PG117 SE • Future Growth As Indian River County continues to grow, affordable housing need will also continue to grow. According to current projections, the county's population will increase by almost fifty percent by 2025. The county's population projections are as follows: Indian River County Population Projections 2000 2005 2010 2020 2025 Source: 2000 Florida Statistical Abstract • Housing Element 111,411 122.700 132,100 155,200 166,200 Under Florida's comprehensive planning requirements (Ch. 163, F.S. and CH. 9J-5, F.A.C.), all communities are required. as part of their comprehensive plans. to address the issue of housing affordability. Adopted in 1990. the housing element of the comprehensive plan identifies the county's housing policy in general and its affordable housing policy in particular. The county's comprehensive plan is implemented through the county's adopted Land Development Regulations. Since adoption of the county's comprehensive plan in 1990. the county has established several new housing programs and regulations to address various housing problems. In addition. the county has reviewed all of its ordinances and regulations to determine if any unnecessarily increase housing costs. Where appropriate. the regulations and ordinances have been revised to encourage the provision of affordable housing within the county. Included among the county's housing policies and regulations are the following: * Regulations providing up to a 20% density bonus for affordable housing development projects (housing element policy 2.5, Land Development Regulations Section 911.14(4)(a)). Regulations allowing for small lot subdivisions with reduced setbacks, lot size, and lot width requirements (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 911 and section 971.41(9)). Regulations allowing for accessory single-family dwelling units in all agricultural and residential zoning districts (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 911 and Section 971.41(10)) Regulations allowing multi -family dwelling units in conjunction with commercial development. such as apartments over commercial buildings (Land Development Regulations Section 911.10 and Section 971.41 (6)) Policies for expedited permit processing (Housing Element policies 1.5 and 1.6) Policies requiring review of proposed local policies or regulations which may increase the cost of housing (Housing Element policy 1.7) February 13, 2001 BK I I PG 8 106 7i, A3 Regulations allowing zero lot line subdivisions (Land Development Regulations Section 915.15) Policies providing for the establishment of a Local Housing Assistance Program to allow the county to utilize State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) program funds for the provision of affordable housing (Local Housing Assistance program, Local Housing Assistance plan, Housing Element policies 2.7, 3.5. 4.4, 4.6 4.7. 4.9, and 9.1) • Housing Incentive Plan One requirement that the county had to meet to receive SHIP funds was to prepare and adopt a housing incentive plan. Like all counties and eligible municipalities participating in the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP), Indian River County had to adopt an affordable housing incentive plan within 12 months after the establishment of its local housing assistance program. Indian River County's adopted Housing Incentive Plan includes various initiatives including the following: • Expedited processing of permits for affordable housing projects. • Modified impact fee requirements. • Allowance of increased density levels. • Reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing projects serving very low-income and low- income persons. • Transfer of development rights as a financing mechanism for housing for very low-income and low-income persons. • Allowance of zero -lot -line configurations. • Establishment of a process by which a local government considers, before adoption. policies, procedures. ordinances. regulations. or plan provisions that have a significant impact on the cost of housing. • Provision of Affordable Housing As indicated above. the private sector is not providing any significant amount of non -subsidized affordable housing. In order to address the need for affordable housing then, government assistance must be provided. This assistance is available and being provided through various state and federal affordable housing programs. In Indian River County, the SHIP (State Housing Initiative Partnership) program is a significant source of affordable housing assistance. Funded through documentary tax revenue passed through by the state the SHIP program is administered by county planning staff. As structured. the county's SHIP program operates as a revolving loan fund. whereby low interest and no interest Loans are given primarily to low and very low income households for down payment and closing cost assistance with the principal eventually returned to the SHIP fund. At current funding levels (approximately $1.2 million in FY 2000/2001 and $900,000 projected for FY 2001/2002). the SHIP program is assisting approximately 60 households a year. Because the SHIP program focuses almost exclusively on home ownership by assisting low and very low income households purchase and/or rehabilitate homes. the program provides several community benefits. Not only does the SHIP program meet a part of the county's affordable housing need; it also provides the benefit of creating homeowners, a_group which generally creates neighborhood stability, maintains its housing, and contributes to the community. February 13, 2001 107 B1(II7PG119 fZ Although the SHIP program meets part of the county's affordable housing need through providing for homeownership and rehabilitation of owner -occupied homes. there are many low and very low income households needing housing assistance that are not good candidates for homeownership. These include households that have difficulty doing home maintenance, households that are more transient. and others For those types of households, affordable rental units are the preferred type of housing assistance. Generally, most affordable rental units are constructed by private developers using state and federal housing assistance. Often times. such projects are built with a variety of funding sources. Two of the programs most often used are the low income tax credit program and the state bond program. Both of the above referenced programs are competitive whereby projects proposed throughout the state compete for limited funding. In recent years, the competition for funds has become more difficult. One factor that is imponant in the competitive scoring of applications is local contribution. Currently, Indian River County does not provide a local contribution for such projects. Until the county does provide a local contribution. the county probably will not get any additional projects of that type. There are several potential sources for a county contribution to affordable housing projects. One is the financing of impact fees. Another is the use of SHIP funds as a contribution for affordable. housing rental projects. Currently, the county's SHIP program is structured such that the county cannot use SHIP funds to provide a contribution to affordable rental projects. The change that, the county's local housing assistance plan would need to be revised. and state approval of those revisions would be required. Even if the county's SHIP program were to modified to allow contributions to affordable rental projects. the maximum contribution would be limited to 25 percent of the county's SHIP annual allocation That is because the state requires that at least 65% of SHIP funds be used for homeownership and because the county uses 10 percent of SHIP funds for administrative costs. Also. any SHIP funds used for a contribution to affordable rental projects would reduce the amount of SHIP funds for ownership applicants. Currently, the county sets aside SHIP funds for Habitat for Humanity and a HOME program developer. and has insufficient funds to accommodate other SHIP program demand. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review all information provided at the meeting and provide direction to staff. Attachments 1. Subsidized Housing Location Map 2. A copy of the report regarding Section 8 need and waiting List. 3. A copy of the cover page and executive summary of the HUD report titled "Rental Housing Assistance - The Crisis Continues" u\v\s\affhoum.agn February 13, 2001 B;{ 117 PG 120 108 SAr sir Gs Arvin Bua oat f Goyt A'sot My, _AM.'Sa D2 ie �s, 1l'j" ' Commissioner Adams thought the County would get a "bigger bang for the buck" by not taking the SHIP allocations but instead financing impact fees. We would get double the value for the same amount of dollars. Commissioner Macht asked for a definition of "financing impact fees", and Director Keating explained that an applicant would not be required to pay his total impact fee liability at building permit time; the payments could either be amortized over a number of years or a lump sum payment could be deferred to a future specified date in, perhaps, five years. Commissioner Adams advised that interest could be charged. Chairman Ginn advised that she was totally against this and felt that any developer needs to pay at least the impact fees for water, sewer, and transportation. These developments will impact on our parks and other public services. As far as she was concerned, the impact fees had to be paid up front. Commissioner Adams stated that nothing is done with impact fee money in the beginning; so the County would still get their money plus interest. She pointed out that there is no impact fee for parks or other public services. The utility system now has over $50-$60 million in outstanding bonds and it would behoove us to have enough things going on to make the project pay for itself From a business standpoint, this method would provide funds to help get the bonds paid off The impact fee was only one alternative. The SHIP allocation is another alternative but we would reduce that allocation by more than 30% if we took the money out. Commissioner Macht preferred to use the SHIP funds as they have been in the past. Commissioner Adams thought there was no question about the need for affordable housing. She has seen the single mothers trying to make it on $6/hour and they do not want to own a home, Susi to have a nice clean place to live. Workers here have to live in St. Lucie or Brevard Counties. We cannot put our heads in the sand and say they do not exist; they February 13, 2001 109 BK 1 1 7 PB 121 are there and they need a place to live. We need to try to provide safe affordable housing. She was talking about service industry people, not migrant workers, who cannot get higher paying jobs for many reasons. Chairman Ginn stated that the housing is needed where the people are, the housing is needed in Fellsmere. Commissioner Adams disagreed, advising that it is needed in Indian River County in the urban service area. Commissioner Macht added that by going to a Habitat for Humanity dedication a person would get a good idea what the Board ought to be doing about housing. Chairman Ginn advised that she maintained her position that the impact fees must be paid up front. She asked if the County was still going to allow a 20% density bonus. Director Keating advised that was still in the LDRs, and Chairman Ginn thought that should be removed as it crowds more people together. Commissioner Macht pointed out that the 20% density bonus was discretionary on each individual case, and Director Keating advised that it has to go through the PD process. Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought the need for affordable housing is definitely there and the Board has got to address it. She agreed that the Board could not keep denying that those people are out there and need help. Commissioner Tippin suggested that Chairman Ginn should try to come into town between 4:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. when hundreds and hundreds of people who work here are heading toward St. Lucie County where they live. They also spend their paychecks in St. Lucie. Chairman Ginn thought this county was not in an economic depression, and Commissioner Adams interjected that you could not prove it by the workers who live in St. Lucie. February 13, 2001 110 BKII7PG122 9'a Commissioner Tippin felt that exclusivity is not what works in this county; these people have some rights. too. and they need decent. clean housing. He recalled the big turmoil when affordable housing was built on Indian River Boulevard. He suggested Chairman Ginn survey who lives there: elementary and high school teachers, Sheriff's deputies, and police officers. He had not heard anything about an increase in crime. Chairman Ginn stated that there has been an increase in crime and the Sheriff's office could be contacted for that information. Everything is done for the developer who gets the tax credits, which he can sell, and the density bonus The County gets the additional requirements for police protection, schools, and parks. These people are living somewhere now. She did not oppose affordable housing, but it needs to be in the areas where it is needed and all the pluses should not be given to the developers who are coming here from out of county. Responding to questions from Commissioner Adams, Chairman Ginn knew that some developers have been taking these benefits and using the money for their next development. The County is then covering the additional services which has a serous impact on the county. Commissioner Adams felt this was discrimination against people who do not have a decent income and do not even meet the median income. Further, she felt that Chairman Ginn was saying that these low-income people were bringing crime, which is not correct. Chairman Ginn thought it necessary to get the Sheriffs report. She had pointed out these things in the past about affordable housing and at the very least the Board ought to expect sewer, water, and transportation impact fees up front when they are supposed to be paid. She felt that if the County insists the fees be paid up front, somehow the developer will come up with the funds and still make a profit. In many cases, only a percentage of the units are given to affordable housing and this is a developer's bonanza. Commissioner Adams told of meeting a homeless family in their little camp in the February 13, 2001 111 BKH7PG123 tc woods. This family is not any different than most of us; the father was working, the two kids were going to school and they did not have a place to live. It changed her perspective on the homeless. She knows that housing is a big problem and she wanted to try to provide a solution. It would be nice to have a developer come in and not ask for some incentive, but it is a tough business and there are not many that are financially able to do it. The tax credits are also given for historic preservation and as an incentive to provide solutions. Commissioner Macht pointed out that the Commissioners have staff and the Technical Review Committee to review these projects. Chairman Ginn pointed out that the Commissioners did not have an updated Shimberg study, nor was an updated census reflected in this report. She was not arguing that the county does not need affordable housing, but is opposed to too many giveaways. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, to accept the report and instruct staff to come up with an appropriate form of impact fee financing that would be an alternative to our local match to encourage the development of affordable housing. Staff to bring back any other alternatives, all site or project specific. Chairman Ginn reiterated her objections and reasons and was in the middle of calling the question when a speaker stepped forward and was recognized. Guy Barber, 1678 Highland Avenue, advised that he lived across the street from Kyle's Run, an affordable housing project and felt it was dangerous to come home late at night. He suggested the Board get a report from the Sheriff's office on the cost of taking care of problems at Kyle's Run and stated that people from counties to the south were waiting for February 13, 2001 112 BK11tPG1214 affordable housing to move here and they were not going to bring prosperity with them. The people who are already in the county will not be living there, because it will be taken up by out of county people who want to get out of the jungle down there. Commissioner Macht inquired whether a priority list could be established for local people only, and Director Keating thought that could not be done. Donna Pepper advised that the Board had given her a portion of the County's tax exempt bonds about 18 months ago in order to build affordable housing. Her development consists of 172 units currently under construction on Walker Avenue. This was one of the first properties she purchased and it took 4 years to develop it. She advised that she also currently operates units in Ft. Pierce and Orange County. The reason financing is so competitive is because more and more developers are drawn into this financing to satisfy the need. She pointed out that there is no incentive for a developer to build affordable housing other than the Federal government's tax credit program and the tax exempt bond program. The only profit made on these projects, after the tax credits are sold to provide the equity, is a developer fee which has to cover overhead, costs, and operating deficits including the full lease up of the property. She encouraged the Board to obtain from the Sheriff's office the number of runs made to not only the affordable housing units, but also to any condominium project or rental project in the county. She thought that percentages will run a minuscule percentage larger than any other project. There are domestic problems in every economic strata. She complimented staff for their in-depth and very comprehensive report. She hoped that in the next two years she would be able to develop another affordable housing project in this county which is very difficult to do because of the high cost of the impact fees, which must be paid out of equity. She paid $872,000 for impact fees on 172 units. She does not quibble about paying impact fees that the project can economically bear. The reason for the 25% discount on impact fees, which is not on all the fees, is to give an February 13, 2001 113 117PG125 4I 4 9.99 incentive to build affordable housing. From her perspective, if the impact fees are not paid during construction, she would not get tax credits on that portion of the cost. It would not be an incentive to her to finance the impact fees past the construction period. It would be nice to pay them out over the course of construction because that would save interest costs. Housing for the homeless and very low income population is Section 8, not affordable housing. In response to Chairman Ginn, Ms. Pepper advised that all 172 units at Walker Avenue are affordable at 60% of the median income. The rents will be $467 to $567 and those rents are adjusted by the unit size and the family size. Those units have to stay in compliance and are monitored by the IRS for 25 years. Ms. Pepper advised Chairman Ginn that she resented the comment that this is a "giveaway". The affordable housing waiting list is now 263 families. At a very minimum the County should have in process 263 units of affordable housing and 164 units of Section 8 Housing. She felt if she came into Indian River County to build Section 8 housing, she would be laughed out of the county. If the Board looks at the tri -county area, they will see all the affordable housing concentration is in St. Lucie County. As developers come into this county to try to build affordable housing, the opposition is tremendous. It took her 2-1/2 years to get before the Board and then 4 years to build 172 units. Chairman Ginn asked Ms. Pepper wrap up her comments as the Board had heard a lot of this before. Commissioner Adams was not sure the Board had heard it before and did not want it to appear that the Board was not listening to what Ms. Pepper was saying. Ms. Pepper continued that by looking at the waiting lists in Indian River, St. Lucie, and Brevard Counties, the Board can determine how many people really want to live in Indian River County. The fact that there is a waiting list for housing in the county negates February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG 126 114 the issue that was put forward that people are coming from other counties in the state to converge on Indian River County. This is not true because they cannot afford to live here even with affordable housing. At this point, Chairman Ginn gave Ms. Pepper one more minute. Ms. Pepper advised that 25% of the SHIP funds are to be used as an incentive for rental housing which is not enough to result in a successful application for affordable housing. The Board is on the right track in looking at the need in relation to the surrounding area as well as what Indian River County should offer as incentives for affordable housing. Prior to calling for the vote, Chairman Ginn warned the Commissioners that they were going way out on a limb for these impact fees and she hoped they understood the financial impact to the County. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried 4-1, Chairman Ginn opposed. 11.B.1. RANKING OF VENDORS AND AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH PERSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FOR EMS AMBULANCE BILLING SERVICES The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 2001: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator January 22, 2001 SUBJECT: Notice of Ranking of Vendors and Authorization to Negotiate a Contract with Per - Se Technologies, Inc., for EMS Ambulance Billing Services February 13, 2001 BKII7PG127 During the fall of FY 2000, staff was authorized to release a Request for Proposals (RFP) for EMS Ambulance Billing Services. EMS billing services have been provided by TC Billing, a subsidiary of Indian River Memorial Hospital, since 1989 when EMS operations were implemented by the County While the County has been satisfied with the services provided by TC Billing, the US Health Care Financing Administration (Medicare) has made major and substantial changes to the billing process, some of which require billing providers to have sufficient staff and expertise to maintain ongoing compliance programs. conduct self audits. continuing training for staff. the need for certified coders, and adherence to many federal rules and regulations that are all encompassing. For TC Billing to comply with the new requirements. staff submits that additional staff would have to be hired and the percentage of collections would have had to be increased from the 7.5% now being charged by the billing firm. Notice has been provided to TC Billing that the County plans to terminate the existing contract. A total of seventeen (17) firms requested. or were provided. with RFP 3016 and four (4) submitted proposals. In accordance with the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA) a Selection Committee was appointed by the County Administrator to review the proposals submitted by vendors to provide EMS ambulance billing services to the County. The Selection Committee was composed of the following staff Douglas M. Wright. Director of Emergency Services Toni Frame, Director of General Services Jim Judge. EMS Chief Jason Brown Budget Manager The Selection Committee reviewed the proposals submitted by the four (4) firms in response to RFP 3016 and decided to hear oral presentations from three (3) firms On Thursday, January 18.2001 the Committee interviewed the three (3) firms and based on their experience, qualifications. and presentation. determined the following prioritized short list: 1. Per -Se Technologies. Inc. 2. Sackett Medical Management 3. National EMS Billing, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests authorization to enter into contract negotiations with the number one ranked firm. This process will be carried out as prescribed in the statutes and the proposed contract will be brought back to the Board for consideration and final approval. ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation Form February 13, 2001 BR 117 PG 128 MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, to approve staff s recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Adams was concerned about the fee because of having done an RFQ rather than an RFP and asked if the fee was not also bid. Emergency Services Director Douglas Wright advised that the bidders did bid on the fee and he believed that Per -Se bid 6-1/2%, Sackett bid 7-1/2%, National EMS bid higher, and the highest bid was 9%. Chairman Ginn asked ifstaffhad looked at Per -Se's financial condition, and Director Wright advised that if they can come to an agreement on a contract, then they will do the background inquiry. Staff has already done some work and looked into a situation in Stuart, and will follow up on that. Chairman Ginn wanted assurance about the financial stability of the successful company, and Director Wright stated he would be asking Administrator Chandler if some money could be spent on a background investigation. Responding to Commissioner Adams, he advised that Per -Se is an existing large company that operates throughout the nation but because they are collecting a substantial amount of money, he wanted to be sure that everything is proper. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. (Authorized staff to enter into contract negotiations with the number one ranked firm, Per -Se Technologies, Inc. for EMS Ambulance Billing Services.) February 13, 2001 11.B.2. REMOVAL OF DERELICT VESSEL - MICHAEL J. QUATRARO d/b/a SEBASTIAN TOW BOAT AND SALVAGE - DERELICT VESSEL REMOVAL PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 25, 2001: TO: Honorable Board of County Co missioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Douglas M. Wright, Dierector Emergency Services DATE: January /5, 2001 SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Re II oval of a Derelict Vessel with Funding from the Derelict Vessel Removal Program Grant Agreement On July 11.2000, the Board ofCounty Commissioners approved the submission ofa Derelict Vessel Removal Program Grant Application to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for the removal of five derelict vessels from the Indian River, On September 11, 2000. the County was notified that grant funds in the amount of $6,836.15 had been allocated to Indian River County for removal of the vessels. The Board approved the Grant Agreement on October 10, 2000, and authorized $2 500 in additional county funding for anticipated landfill fees to dispose of the vessels. Since the amount of funding was limited for this project. staff utilized department personnel and equipment along with a commercial tow truck and assistance from SWDD staff to remove four of the five derelict vessels incurring only $1,087.50 in expenses. The expenses incurred to date are as follows: Solid Waste Disposal District Tow truck services Department overtime (4 divers) $150.60 $150.00 $786.90 $1,087.50 The remaining vessel identified in the removal grant is a 27 foot sailboat located generally east of the River Run Condominium complex. Given its current condition, a marine salvage barge will be required to lift and transport it to shore and then to the landfill. Staff has attempted to obtain three quotes from area marine salvage companies, however only two written responses could be obtained One was from Michael J. Quatraro d/b/a Sebastian Tow Boat and Salvage in the amount of $4.995 for the removal which includes transporting it to the landfill. The second bid was from Towboat US who bid $300 per foot ($8.100) for complete removal and disposal in the landfill or $275.00 per foot ($7,425) to remove the vessel to a shore side disposal container. February 13, 2001 BK117PG130 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board award the bid for this project to Michael J. Quatraro d/bia Sebastian Tow Boat and Salvage at the quoted price of $4.995. If approved, the expenses will total $6.082.50 or $753.65 less than the available grant funds of $6.836.15 allocated by the State for this project. The $2,500 in county funds prior approved by the Board will not be needed for this project and will not be expended. ATTACHMENT: Written quote from Michael J. Quatraro d/b/a Sebastian Tow Boat and Salvage dated 1/8/01. Written quote (undated) from Towboat US. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded the bid for the project to Michael J. Quatraro d/b/a Sebastian Tow Boat and Salvage at the quoted price of $4,995 and by approval acknowledged that the expenses will total $6,082.50 or $753.65 less than the available grant funds of $6,836.15 allocated by the State for this project. The Board further understood that the $2,500 in County funds approved previously will not be needed for this project and will not be expended. Commissioners congratulated staff for having done an excellent job in this regard. 11.B.3. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-013 - DECLARING A STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY RESTRICTING NON -PERMITTED OPEN BURNING The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 5, 2001: February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 PG 131 TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: Douglas M. Wright, Litt Emergency Services 1 DATE: February 5, 2001 SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Declaring a State of Local Emergency Restricting Non - Permitted Open Buming Lower than normal winter rainfalls have caused Indian River County to experience extremely dry conditions. Daily conditions of moderate winds, low humidity, and dry vegetation concern staff as to the propensity for brush fires to propagate rapidly once ignited. Under Chapter 590, Florida Statutes. the Florida Division of Forestry (FDOF/DOF) has the primary responsibility for prevention, detection, and suppression of wildfires wherever they may occur. However, the DOF is dependant upon the Emergency Services Fire Division to protect improved properties within the urban/rural interface. Given the extreme drought conditions now existing. staff is in daily contact with DOF staff regarding cooperative efforts in the event of a significant brush fire. The Keetch-Byram Drought Index utilized in this state. uses a scale from zero (extremely wet) to 800 (near -desert conditions). Indian River County's index has been more than 600 for approximately a week and as of February 4, 2001, the County index was 628. This county is one of only fifteen (1 of 15) counties in the state within this high end range which signifies a substantial danger risk. Other counties have experienced similar drought conditions and several have asked the State for pro -active measures such as a bum ban. Governor Jeb Bush, under Executive Order 01-25, recognized the imminent danger of wildfires, but stopped short of issuing a burn ban. The Executive Order only authorized the DOF to utilize the necessary resources to cope with a wildfire emergency and empowered the Florida Division of Emergency Management with the over all authority to coordinate the assignment of firefighting support missions requested by the DOF. Given this position by the State, the DOF must entertain requests daily for open burning permits which can only be declined if wind conditions, humidity, and the recent number of accidental fire starts justify a prohibition for that day. Most of the requested permits are related to agriculture operations silviculture, and the clearing of large tracts of land. The County has the authority under Florida Statutes, Chapter 252.38(3)(a)5, to take whatever prudent action is necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the community Staff submits that the requested action to restrict burning is necessary to ensure the health. safety, and welfare of the community given the rising drought index and extreme fire conditions If approved, the declaration of local emergency must be renewed in seven (7) day increments. Absent this authority to restrict burning, local law enforcement and the Fire Division have no substantive authority to require extinguishment of such fires unless the smoke resents a health or traffic hazard. The DOF has committed to assisting local government should a declaration be enacted which is very helpful given they have citation authority. February 13, 2001 BK 11i 132 120 ev It is beyond staffs ability to predict when the drought conditions will cease and there is great concern about the rising drought index and extreme fire conditions. While in recent weeks there have not been a significant number of brush fires, the fires we have experienced quickly threatened a number of homes. RECOMMENDATION: Out of an abundance of concern and taking prudent action which is necessary to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the community, staff recommends the Board approve the attached resolution declaring a State of Local Emergency restricting and banning all non -permitted bonfires. campfires. fireworks. and yard trash Per statutes, the declaration is valid in seven (7) day increments and must be renewed or it expires at the end of the seven (7) day period. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Declaring State of Local Emergency Florida Division of Forestry Keetch-Byram Drought Index Governor Executive Order 01-25 dated January 25, 2001 MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, to approve staff's recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Adams understood that this was to adopt a policy that when the drought index reaches 600 we will automatically suspend burning, and Emergency Services Director Douglas Wright advised that the index was 644 and climbing, and it was imperative that his staff know if any substantial burning is going to occur so they can be prepared. Anyone with questions should contact the Fire Prevention Bureau for information. Fire Chief John King explained that the Division of Forestry still can issue permits for agricultural burns. The Emergency Services Department is trying to restrict residential - type burning due to the extreme drought conditions. The department has a problem because they have no power to direct that a residential burn be extinguished, but this resolution would give them that authority. Once the drought index and conditions change, people will be able to burn their yard trash. Discussion ensued about the concerns for burning. February 13, 2001 is 121 B<117PG 133 fee MOTION WAS AMENDED to include the language "in residential neighborhoods" under paragraph 2 of the resolution and was agreed to by the maker and seconder of the motion. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. (Adopted Resolution declaring a state of local emergency due to drought, and prohibiting non -permitted open burning and discharge of fireworks, authorizing the County Administrator to rescind the declaration of local emergency or to extend the declaration of local emergency in 7 - day increments, and establishing an effective date.) RESOLUTION 2001-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DECLARING A STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO DROUGHT, AND PROHIBITING NON -PERMITTED OPEN BURNING AND DISCHARGE OF FIREWORKS, AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO RESCIND THE DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY OR TO EXTEND THE DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY IN 7 -DAY INCREMENTS, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, by issuing Executive Order Number 01-25, the Office of the Governor recognizes that a state of emergency exists throughout the State of Florida because of the extended drought and the resulting potential for wildfires; and WHEREAS, the Florida Division of Forestry uses a numerical index to measure the potential for wildfires on which a value exceeding 400 denotes a significant danger of fire; and, WHEREAS, Indian River County's current drought index exceeds 600; and, WHEREAS, the drought being experienced in Indian River County increases the potential for wildfires; and WHEREAS, wildfires pose a serous threat to the lives and property of the residents of and visitors to Indian River County; and February 13, 2001 BK1I7PG;3L4 122 WHEREAS, Section 252.38(3)(a)(5), Florida Statutes (2000), empowers the Board of County Commissioners to take "whatever prudent action is necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the community" during a state of local emergency; and WHEREAS, Section 252.38(3)(a)(5), Florida Statutes (2000), authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to "waive the procedures and formalities otherwise required" dunng a state of local emergency, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida as follows: 1. A state of local emergency is declared, effective immediately, due to drought, within the geographic bounds of Indian River County Florida, unincorporated and incorporated areas alike 2. To ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the community, any non - permitted open burning in a residential neighborhood, including, but not limited to, bonfires, campfires, burning of yard trash, and the discharge of fireworks, are prohibited within the geographic bounds of Indian River County, Florida unincorporated and incorporated areas alike. 3. The state of local emergency shall remain in full force and effect for seven (7) days, except that the County Administrator is authorized to rescind the state of local emergency before expiration of seven days or to extend the state of local emergency in 7 - day increments. 4. The Board of County Commissioners authorizes the Emergency Services Director to activate all plans, authorizations, and procedures contained in the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, if needed in his discretion to protect lives and property. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbri dqe and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n to a vote, the vote was as follows: and upon being put Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Vice -Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 13th day of February , 2001 February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG 135 Attest: J.K. Barton, Clerk of Circuit Court by • • Deputy Clerk 4 i. A SW f_. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: 40/../ x4(..1 Caroline D. Ginn, airman memo Rive Ca Admin Legal 6UdOe1 Dept. Risk Mgr. Approved Date 1; 11.G.1. RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-014 AND 2001-015 - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 34TH AVENUE 35TH AVENUE AND INTERSECTING STREETS IN GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION (RESOLUTIONS I AND II) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 26, 2001: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directvt AND Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine FROM: SUBJECT: Michelle A. Gentile, CET, Civil Engineer Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to and set Public Hearing date for: 34TH AVENUE, 35TH AVENUE AND INTERSECTING STREETS IN GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION - IRC PROJECT NO. 9918 DATE: January 26, 2001 DFSCRIPTIQN ANT) CONT)ITTONS The County Public Works Department has received a petition for a public improvement assessment for road paving and drainage improvements for the following: 34th Avenue, 35th Avenue and Intersecting Streets in Grovenor Estates Subdivision February 13, 2001 BK 1 17 PG 136 124 A providing resolution is presented for adoption by the Board. The petition was signed by owners of 60 of the 90 property owners in the proposed benefitted area. This represents 67% of the owners in the proposed benefitted area who are in favor of having this road paved. .A separate resolution is presented for adoption to hold a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner. This Public Hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 6, 2001 at 9:05 A M. in the County Commission Chambers. An assessment roll and plat has been prepared and filed with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners G • u u ►1i a • ► : ►1a AID lk It is recommended that the Board: 1) Adopt the resolution providing for the paving and drainage improvements for the projects subject to the terms outlined in the resolution. The applicable interest rate shall be established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time the final assessment roll is approved. 2) Allocate 5679,012.32 from the Petition Paving Account #111-214-541-035.39. 3) Adopt a resolution setting the time and place of the Public Hearing. ATTACHMF TTS 1) Providing Resolution for Paving and Drainage 2) Setting Resolution for Public Hearing 3) Cost Estimate 4) Assessment Roll and Assessment Plat ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2001-014 providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to 34`h Avenue, 35`h Avenue and intersecting streets in the Grovenor Estates Subdivision, providing the total estimated cost, method of payment of assessments, number of annual installments, and legal description of the area specifically benefitted. February 13, 2001 125 BK1I7PG137 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 014 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 34T" AVENUE, 35T" AVENUE AND INTERSECTING STREETS IN THE GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED. _ WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department has been petitioned for Road Paving and Drainage Improvement for 34th Avenue, 35`h Avenue and Intersecting Streets in the Grovenor Estates Subdivision. WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Chapter 206, Section 206.01 through 206.09, Indian River County Code; and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls have been completed by the Public Works Department; and the total estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY NINE THOUSAND TWELVE DOLLARS and THIRTY TWO CENTS ($679,012.32); and WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall, for any given record •owner of property within the area specially benefitted, be in an amount equal to that proportion of seventy-five percent (75%) of the total cost of the project plus 2% collection fee ($519,444.42) which the number of acreage owned by the given owner bears to the total number of acreage within the areas specially benefitted and twenty-five percent (25%) of the total cost of the project ($169,753.08) will come from Petition Paving Account. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefitted thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments; and WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and payable at the Office of the Department of Utility Service of Indian River County ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special assessment pursuant to Section 206.08, Indian River County Code; and February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG 138 126 arn WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12) months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly; WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the following described properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these improvement, to wit: Lots 1 through 9 and Lot 16, Block 3; Lots 1 through 16, Block 4; Lots 1 through 16, Block 5; Lots 1 through 9 and Lot 16, Block 6; Lots 1 through 9 and Lot 16, Block 10; Lots 1 through 16 Block 11; Lots 1 through 16, Block 20; Lots 1 through 8 and Lot 16, Block 21 Grovenor Estates Subdivision, Unit 1, Plat Book 4, Page 79. AND Indian River Farms Co. Sub. PBS 2-25 E ' 2 ofE 20.7 ac. of Tr. 3, less Canal & less S771.85ft. ofE%zofE%2less S514.6ft. ofW%2ofE%z AND Indian River Farms Co. Sub. PBS 2-25 S 1/2 of S 257.25 ft. ofE % ofE % ofE 20.7 ac. of Tr. 3 AND Indian River Farms Co. Sub. PBS 2-25 N 514.6 ft. of S 771.85 ft. ofE % ofE 1/2 of E 20.7 acres of Tr. 3 less 257.3 ft. THEREOF AND Indian River Farms Co. Sub. PBS 2-25 N % of S 257.25 ft. ofE % ofE % ofE 20 ac. of Tr. 3 less Rd. R/W as in OR Bk 820 PP 215 AND Indian River Farms Co. Sub. PBS 2-25 N 128.65 ft. of S 514.6 ft. ofE 1/2 ofE '/2 of E 20.7 ac. of Tr. 3 AND Indian River Farms Co. Sub. PBS 2-25 N 128.65 ft. of S 385.95 ft. ofE '/2 ofE ! 4 of E 20.7 ac. of Tr. 3 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety. 2. A project providing for paving and drainage improvements to 34"' Avenue, 35`h Avenue and Intersecting Streets in the Grovenor Estates Subdivision; heretofore designated as Public February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG 139 Works Project No. 9918 is hereby approved subject to the terms outlined above and all a requirements of Chapter 206, et se q. Indian Riverpplicable County Code. 3. This Resolution shall be published by the Public Works Department one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal newspaper. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: EMM Adams Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Vice -Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye Commissioner John 13. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this 13th day of February ,2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Caroline D. Ginn, Chairm Attest: L t JE • • Y K. BARTON, C er February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 PG 140 • Administrationmmaft ra z9-/ 7 Public Works 128 fy ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2001-015 setting a time and place at which the owners of property on 34`h Avenue, 35th Avenue, and intersecting streets in the Grovenor Estates Subdivision and other interested persons may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements to said property as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property benefitted thereby. RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 015 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON 34T1I AVENUE, 35TH AVENUE AND INTERSECTING STREETS IN THE GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PROPERTY AS TO THE COST THEREOF AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITTED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No.01 4 determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described herein, that paving and drainage improvements be made to said property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and February 13, 2001 129 61( 117P6 141 WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements to said property, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefitted thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 A.M. on Tuesday. MARCH 6 7001, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard to said property. The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefitted are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefitted may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8.30 A.M. until 5:00 P.M. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by the Department of Public Works by two publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Public Works shall give the owner of each February 13, 2001 BKI17PG1142 property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Tippin , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Kenneth Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 13th BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA Attest: Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL Indian River County Administration Budget Legal Public Works Encineenno February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 GU 14 3 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR 34TH & 35TH AVENUE SW (between 13th Street SW & Oslo Road) PROJECT # 9918 TOTAL L F TOTAL ACRES 8,000.00 ENGINEERING $2.59/L.F. 890720.00 CONSTRUCTION 5636 757.94 SUB -TOTAL PERMIT FEES TESTING ROW ACQUISITION & TITLE SEARCH 3.000006 % ADMINISTRATION RECORDING FEE $657,477.94 1060.00 SUB -TOTAL $21,534.38 TOTAL COST OF PROJECT $679,012.32 75% TO BE PAID BY PROPERTY OWNERS 25% TO BE PAID BY COUNTY 2% COLLECTION FEE (75% FIGURE) TOTAL ASSESSMENT $509,259.24 $169,753.08 $10,185.18 $519,444.42 COST PER ACRE $16,611.59 FULL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.2. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION CONTRACT - 5TH STREET SW IMPROVEMENTS - KATHRYN KARRICK CLYATT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 26, 2001: February 13, 2001 BK117PG144 James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: William M. Napier, SRPA, SRA i Right -of -Way Agent `���� SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition 5th Street SW Improvements Kathryn Karrick Clyatt DATE: January 26, 2001 Additional right-of-way of sixty feet (60') along the north side of 5`h Street SW is needed for proposed road improvements. The Seller has executed a contract at a price of $18 000.00 per acre for the RS -3 zoned land. This pnce per acre is comparable to other purchases the County has closed within this market area based upon appraisals or evaluations. The total Contract Price is $12,876.60, which includes $8,568.00 $3,108 60 for grove restoration (replacing the ditch and service road),oand$1,200.00 2for 24 citrus trees located beyond the new right-of-way hne, which will have to be removed to reconstruct the ditch and road. There are no appraisal or attorney fees •uu ►•► _►9 Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the $12,876.60 purchase and authonze the Chairman to execute the contract. Funding to be from Account #315-214-541-066.12 ArEAClimaa 1) Contract 2) Addendum 3) Legal Description February 13, 2001 BKII7PGI45 ka ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the $12,876.60 purchase of right-of-way needed for the 5`h Street SW improvements from Kathryn Karrick Clyatt and authorized the Chairman to execute the contract, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.3. CONSULTANT SELECTION - DESIGNBUILD SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS SPRING TRAINING FACILITY - PROCEED WITH CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH HOK SPORTS FACILITIES GROUP The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 24, 2001: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Consultant Selection - Design/Build Services for Improvements to The Los Angeles Dodgers Spring Training Facility DATE: January 24, 2001 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Requests for Statement of Qualifications were received on January 10, 2001 and the selection committee met and selected three qualifying firms. Letters were sent to the firms requesting presentations from each firm. The consultant selection committee, consisting ofJim Chandler, Craig Callan, Dodgertown, and Jim Davis, interviewed firms on January 23, 2001 for the purpose of consultant ranking. After considering the selection criteria, the committee recommends the following prioritized short- list: 1. HOK Sports Facilities Group, Kansas City, Mo. 2 Heery International, Inc., Tampa, Fl. 3. BRPH Companies, Melbourne, FL February 13, 2001 BK II PGI46 134 • �uu 1: 1 :► 1 1 Staff recommends approval of the above prioritized short-list and authorization for the Los Angeles Dodgers to proceed with contract negotiation with the first ranked firm, HOK Sports Facilities Group. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the short list and authorized the Los Angeles Dodgers to proceed with contract negotiation with the first -ranked firm, HOK Sports Facilities Group, as recommended in the memorandum. Commissioner Macht remarked on this item "hooray". 11- SHOOTING RANGE - BUILDINGS - CHANGE ORD 3 - WILLIAM GLOVER INC. ER NO. The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 1, 2001: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director Terry B. Thompson, P.E. - Capital Projects Manager"" FROM: G. Sean McGuire, P.E. c` Project Engineer SUBJECT: Shooting Range - Buildings IRC Project #9629B Change Order No. 3 DATE: February 1, 2001 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This project was awarded to William Glover, Inc. on August 1, 2000. Change Orders No. 1 No. 2 have been previously approved to adjust the scope of the project and provide a net deduct ($70,776.23) from the original contract amount. This change order adds $41,104.00 worth of work to the job, and deletes ($5,068.50), to give a net change of $36,035 50. That, when added to the current contract amount of $535,636 57, will result in a new contract amount of $571 672.07. February 13, 2001 135 BIR111PGI47 mf Approximately ($97,000.00) worth of credits for directly purchased materials will be presented in a future change order As the work is not yet complete, the bills are still being processed for these purchases. The County will receive credits for the actual costs of the materials, plus 3% for a share of the tax savings. The contractor, William Glover, Inc. will retain the balance of the tax savings as compensation for their additional bookkeeping and administrative assistance in coordinating the purchases. Thirty-six (36) days are also proposed to be added to the current contract time in order to give the contractor sufficient time to accomplish the extra tasks included in this change order-. That, when added to the current contract completion date of January 12, 2001, will result in a new contract completion date of February 17 2001. This will bring the entire project completion date into agreement with the previously approved date for the new office/classroom/bathroom building. The whole job should be finished at the same time. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for a net addition of $36,035.50 to the current contract amount of $535,636 57, to give a new contract amount of $571,672.07. Also, approve the 36 day time extension for completing the additional work and revise the contract completion date to be February 17, 2001. Funding is account # 312-108-575-066.51. ATTACHMENT Change Order #3 Guy Barber, 1678 Highlands Avenue, asked who was paying for this change order, expressed concerns about the County having to pay for maintenance because he thought the State should be paying for it, and how the County could absolve itself from having anymore financial involvement in the shooting range. He also wanted to know when it would be open. Public Works Director James W. Davis replied that the project is being funded substantially by a $1,050,000 grant from the State of Florida. The County is funding about $200,000. Director Davis advised that 85% of the project is funded by the Federal and State government, most of which is Pittman -Roberts funds. Mr. Barber understood that Pittman -Roberts funds are related to a special tax on guns and ammunition. He wondered why Indian River County taxpayers were having to pay more February 13, 2001 BK 117 PG € 136 iR4 costs for this project. He understood Pittman -Roberts money is available to pay for staffing the gun range and he objected to having County taxpayers pay for it. Commissioner Adams explained that the County made some significant changes during construction to make the gun range safer. Having looked at gun ranges across the state, those run by government versus a concessionaire were far superior. In ranges run by a private concession, it was all about money and it has to be. The decision was made to manage the facility ourselves to have tighter control and the ability to provide a better facility. The $200,000 start up costs are being paid by the County. The goal is to have this facility operate in the black using an enterprise system _just like the golf course does. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED 13Y Vice Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved Change Order No. 3 for a net addition of $36,035.50 to the current contract amount of $535,636.57, to give a new contract amount of $571,672.07; approved the 36 -day extension for completion of the additional work; and approved the revision of the contract completion date to be February 17, 2001, as recommended in the memorandum. CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.5. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN AND PERMITTING - AMENDMENT NO. 2 - APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 22, 2001: February 13, 2001 137 BK 117P6l[49 James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Jeffrey R. Tabar, •.E Coastal Engineer SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to Professional Service Agreement with Applied Technology and Management for Design and Permitting DATE: January 22, 2001 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County is presently under contract with Applied Technology and Management, Inc. (ATM) for professional services, which include permitting and design for the Beach Preservation Plan (BPP). Per review comments received from the State (FDEP) and Federal (ACOE) agencies additional services are needed to continue moving forward with the beach restoration projects. ATM has proposed to add additional services to the agreement for the fee of $439,730, which is under the estimated budget for the program. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The additional work includes final permitting services, environmental document preparation and a structural alternative analysis. These services will finalize the permitting process for the initial project. ATM will be responsible for responding to further comments from the reviewing agencies. This work will complete the permitting phase of the project. A detailed scope of work and budget is attached. These professional services are funded through a joint agreement (DEP Contract No. 98IR1) between the County and State of Florida. An amendment to that agreement is attached which increases the State contribution by approximately 638,000. The agreement is based on a 5O% County 50% State contribution. Alternative No. 1 Approve Amendment No. 2 to complete final permitting services for the initial project, and execute the Amendment to the joint agreement with the State of Florida. County Contribution $219,865 State Contribution $219,865 Total $439,730 Alternative No. 2 Deny Amendment No. 2 and re -negotiate the services. February 13, 2001 BKII7PG150 RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING EM Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby Amendment No. 2 for additional services with Applied Technology and Management, Inc., ana the joint agreement with the State of Florida are approvea. The fee totals $439,730 with County obligation of $219,865 and State obligation of $219,865. Funding to be from the Beach. Restoration fund. ATTACHMENT Contract Amendment No. 2 Amendment to Joint DEP Contract No. 98IR1 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved (Alternative No.1.) and authorized the Chairman to execute Amendment No. 2 for additional services with Applied Technology and Management, Inc., and amendment No. 3 to DEP Contract No. 98IR1, Project Agreement with Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection, Office ofBeaches and Coastal Systems, Florida Beach Erosion Control Program are approved. Commissioner Adams said hello to the County's "adjunct engineer" (fonner Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar); and Chairman Ginn told how Mr. Tabar had charmed 100 ladies the previous day at a meeting where he made a presentation. ENGINEERING DESIGN & PERMITTING AMENDMENT NO. 2 AND AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO DEP CONTRACT No 98IR 1 FLORIDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - OFFICE OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS FLORIDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD February 13, 2001 1/4 139 BK 117 PG 151 11.H. RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-016 AND 2001-017 - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -B - RESOLUTIONS I AND II (PROJECT NO. UW -97 -17 -DS) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 5, 2001: DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2001 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E. DIRECTOR OF UTILITY St PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS AND STAFFED MANAGER OF A . ENT PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT • ILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -B INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO UW -97 -17 -DS RESOLUTIONS I AND II BACKGROUND On September 29, 1995. Indian River County entered into an Agreement with the City of Sebastian to assume ownership of the City's water distribution and wastewater collection systems. As a part of the contract, the County agreed to expand the water distribution system. On June 18, 1996. the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Staff's recommendation for the County to proceed with the installation of water lines as set forth in the Inter -local Agreement between Indian River County and the City of Sebastian. (See attached copy of minutes -Attachment 1.) Said Agreement provided for the transfer of the City of Sebastian's water and wastewater system to Indian River County. On October 24, 2000, at a public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners approved Phase III -A, which is presently under construction and should be completed by August 2001. (See attached agenda item and copy of minutes —Attachment 2.) Staff is now ready to proceed with Phase III -B ANALYSIS Within the Phase III -B project, East of Laconia Street & West of Shakespeare Street, between Crystal Mist & Lanfair Avenue's, there are 530 lots and tracts, and approximately 239 homes, to benefit from this project. Typical platted lot sizes are .25 acre, plus or minus. More effective management of project construction, inspections. cash flows, and interaction with property owners is being accomplished by having divided Phases II and III into smaller projects. This may enable more utility construction contractors to bid on these projects possibly making the bid process more competitive. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment projects. as divided into parts A, B, C D & E for Phase III (Attachment 3) This project will provide potable water and fire protection to an area noted for failing well systems. The City of Sebastian is waiting for the completion of the water line installation in order to complete road & drainage improvements and comply with bonding requirements. February 13, 2001 BK I lb 52 140 Project No. Lots I Parcel I.D. Nos./ Homes III -A UW -97 -16 -DS 891 1786 / 384 i 1 III -B Uri' -97 -17 -DS 530 458 / 239 III -C UW -97 -18 -DS 900 822 / 402 III -D UW -97 -19 -DS 698 639 / 232 III -E UW -97 -20 -DS 1 735 654 / 276 Total 13,754 3,359 /1,533 Locations ALL OF PHASE III IS SOUTH OF CR 512 & SOUTHWEST OF BARBER STREET South of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Drive along the South & West East of Laconia St.& West of Shakespeare St.. Between Crystal Mist & Lanfair Ave's IBetween Laconia & Barber St's , between Bayfront Terrace and Rolling Hills (Lansdowne) East of Laconia St. between Clearmont & Capon Streets. West of Laconia St, between Granduer & Gladiola Avenue's South of CR 512 and SW of Barber Street Engineering design has been completed by the staff of the Department of Utility Services for Phase III -B and we are now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project, as outlined herein. A summary assessment roll for Phase III -B is attached (Attachment 4). The full assessment roll is on file in the commission office. This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water line route Financing will be from the assessment fund 473, account number 473-000-169- 489. If needed, inter -fund borrowing will be available from the capacity fee fund 472. The estimated project cost and amount to be assessed for Phases III -B is $ 1,335,742.80 (rounded) (Attachment -5). The estimated cost per square foot is $0.242354 (rounded). The actual assessed cost, as with any project will be determined based on actual competitive bid prices On January 26, 2001, a letter was sent to the City Manager, of the City of Sebastian, with a copy of a draft agenda item and a map of the project area (Attachment 6). RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Resolutions I and II and set the public hearing date. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: 1 -June 18, 1996 BCC minutes 2 -October 24, 2000 BCC minutes 3 -Map of Project area 4 -Summary assessment roll 5 -Estimated Project cost 6 -Letter to City of Sebastian ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED 13Y Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2001-016 providing for the Sebastian Area Phase III -B Water Expansion (an area east ofLaconia Street and west of Shakespeare Street between Crystal Mist and Lanfair Avenues in the city of Sebastian); providing the total estimated cost, method of payment of assessments, number of annual installments, and description of the area specifically served. February 13, 2001 141 8K117PG153 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 016 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE SEBASTIAN AREA PHASE III -B WATER EXPANSION (AN AREA EAST OF LACONIA STREET AND WEST OF SHAKESPEARE STREET BETWEEN CRYSTAL MIST AND LANFAIR AVENUES IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY SERVED. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by a water main extension to Phase III -B of the Sebastian area (located east of Laconia Street and west of Shakespeare Street between Crystal Mist and Lanfair Avenues in the City of Sebastian); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 463 parcels in an area located east of Laconia Street and west of Shakespeare Street between Crystal Mist and Lanfair Avenues in the City of Sebastian in Indian River County, Florida, and that the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of The Code of Indian River County. 2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $1,335,742.80 or $0.242354 per square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments. 3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.242354 per square foot shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public heanng, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code. 4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special assessments after completion of the improvements (the ' Credit Date") without interest. If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal plus interest If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal not paid when due The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the project is completed. 5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications and an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility Services. February 13, 2001 142 BR 1 1 5 LI RESOLUTION NO. 2001-016 6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments. 7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing as required by Section 206 04. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbridge , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being the vote was as follows: P put to a vote, Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Commissioner John W. Tippin Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 13th day of February, 2001. Attest J. K. Barton, Clerk By Deputy Clergy, 4,1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: &e.0.&at.4 . Caroline D. Ginn, Citiairman ON MOTION by Vice Charman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2001-017 setting a time and place at which the owners of the properties located in the Sebastian Phase III -B Water Expansion Area (an area east of Laconia Street and west of Shakespeare Street between Crystal Mist and Lanfair Avenues) and other interested persons, may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing the water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property benefitted thereby. February 13, 2001 143 BK PG 1 5 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 017 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE SEBASTIAN PHASE IH -B WATER EXPANSION AREA (AN AREA EAST OF LACONIA AND WEST OF SHAKESPEARE STREET BETWEEN CRYSTAL MIST AND LANFAIR AVENUES IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN) AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE -THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No 2001- 016 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 463 parcels located in the Sebastian Phase III -B Water Project; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.242354 per square foot; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06 of the Code of Indian River provides that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water Main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9 05 a.m. on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto The area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said February 13, 2001 BKII7 G 156 144 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-017 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. 4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Stanbri dqe motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams vote, the vote was as follows: and, upon Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Commissioner John W. Tippet Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Commissioner Fran B Adams Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye , and the being put to a The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 13th day of February, 2001. Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk B aa.task • Deputy Cletk Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -B INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO UW -97 -17 -DS TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By t cL Ci-.eaH Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman TOTAL ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPERTIES TO BE ASSESSED ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT COST PER SQUARE FOOT February 13, 2001 $ 1,335,742.80 5,511,539 $ 0.24235386886 (Rounded) $ 0.242354 ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 145 61(117PG157 12.A. PROXY DESIGNATION - ANNUAL MEETING OF LANDOWNERS, INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 2, 2001: To: Boar of County Commissioners From. Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney -1113 .2 12- Re: 2 Re: Annual Meeting of Landowners, Indian River Farms Water Control District Recommendation: It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners consider designating a proxy to attend the annual meeting of landowners of Indian River Farms Water Control District on Friday, February 23, 2001, at 2:00 p.m., and act on the Board's behalf. Discussion: Attached is an announcement of the Annual Meeting of Landowners of Indian River Farms Water Control District, which is scheduled in the office of the District, 4400 20' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Friday, February 23, 2001, at 2:00 p.m. According to the proxy form, Indian River County owns 1119 acres in the District. County Attorney Bangel advised that the Commissioners had the option of sending a proxy with or without direction. Chairman Ginn was surprised to see how many acres (1,119) the County owned. Commissioner Adams recommended that Vice Chairman Stanbridge be sent on behalf of the Board. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Tippin temporarily absent) appointed Vice Chairman Stanbridge to serve as the Board's proxy to the Annual Meeting of Landowners of Indian River Farms Water Control District on February 23, 2001, and authorized the Chairman to execute same. February 13, 2001 146 81(117PG158 12.B. 2001 COUNTY FAIR - AGREEMENT WITH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION, INC. The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February' 7, 2001: TO: FROM: RE: Board of County Commissioners Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney .26 2 Agreement with Indian River County Fair Association, Inc.; 2001 County Fair Recommendation: It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners consider the attached agreement with the Indian River County Fair Association, Inc., and, if approved, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement Discussion: The Indian River County Fair Association, Inc., is preparing to operate the annual County fair at the Indian River County Fairgrounds. Attached is a proposed agreement for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. County Attorney Bangel understood that the Fair Association had not yet signed the agreement and that representatives were present to address the Board. Joe Earman, president of the Indian River County Fair Association, advised that in November the Fair Chairman had contacted the County Attorney's office to execute the agreement. The County Attorney made some changes to the previous agreement, which had probably been used for the past ten years. The new agreement was taken to the Fair Association's board and meetings were held with County Attorney Bangel to discuss questions and some changes were agreed upon. The document was returned and he signed it as president and it was forwarded back to the County Attorney's office and then there were additional changes. There have been three more drafts since then. He wanted to try to reach February 13, 2001 147 BK 11 159 some resolution at this meeting on the agreement. He added that the Fair was started in 1980 at the Vero Beach Municipal Airport by Bill Tripp, a firefighter. In 1985, the City of Vero Beach wanted the fair moved because it was getting too big for the airport. Then Commissioner Dick Bird was instrumental in getting it moved to the ..now County Fairgrounds and it was through his efforts that it was accomplished. The fair was chartered through the State, the Courts, and the Legislature as the Indian River County Fair and from 1985 to 1998, Indian River County had run the fair, permitted it through the State, and subcontracted with the Vero Beach Firefighters to operate the fair. In 1998, Commissioner Adams assisted in getting the Fair more uniform with the State's guidelines and the association was formed to conform with Chapter 616 FS. County fairs are regulated by the State and certain events are required to show the attributes of our county. In 1998, the Indian River County Fair Association was formed and was made up of those who had been involved in the fair, firefighters and members of the community. He explained that the Association has little money, and recounted how in 1993 there was a storm of the century which wiped out the fairgrounds and they lost the $7,000 they had put up to run the fair and the County forgave the $9,000 for renting the fairgrounds. After that, they came up with the idea that the $9,000 rent went into the general fund and was not used for fairgrounds improvements. Since 1994, most of the profits went to the County for improvements and a great job has been done with those improvements. This year the association spent over $8,000 on upgrading the electricity in the building. The association still owes the County about $8,000 for the profits from last year's fair and they expect to pay the County before the fair opens or perhaps when they execute the agreement. He advised that there are some things in the contract they do not know if it is possible to do. County Attorney Bangel advised that in previous agreements, the association "pledged" to pay the County 1/3 of the profits for fairground improvements; in the new February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 PG 160 148 contract, that has been changed to "paid". He thought there was no objection by the association. Mr. Earman agreed and trusted Public Works Director James W. Davis and Parks Division Superintendent Jim Romanek to continue the outstanding job they have done. They can talk with both to reach agreement on future improvements. He cited the audit language in paragraph 6 and the County has always received a review of the financial information and it has always been accepted and the State has as well. Getting an audit done on this type of volunteer -type event could run between $5,000 and $25,000 depending on the type of audit desired. Controls would have to be initiated and other methods put in place to account for all the money changing hands Commissioner Adams understood that the Association pays for the people who work there, and that the reason for an audit is to track the monies and have accountability. The County and the Association are partners in this annual event. She thought the intent was to determine how the profit is determined. This has been on the honor system, and that was fine, but she thought that government had the responsibility to go the extra mile. She thought it was the tracking that the County was looking for. Mr Earman did not disagree, until the point that it become bureaucratic in nature. He agreed with what Commissioner Adams was saying. Commissioner Adams quoted one of Mr. Earman's statements the "cash changes hands on a moment -to -moment basis". It was necessary to know whose hands and how much cash, and that was a very vulnerable situation. Mr Earman understood, but did not want the fee for the accountant to be high. He felt they had a good handle on the internal controls and advised that Toby Turner would be happy to explain those. The Association does not have a problem with doing what they have done in the past and doing what the State requires and using language acceptable to Assistant February 13, 2001 149 BK117PG161 Administrator Baird or Budget Manager Jason Brown. Commissioner Adams asked if Mr Earman would be opposed to having the County's internal auditors from Clerk of Circuit Court Jeffrey K. Barton's staff take a look at the internal controls for cash flow and make sure they meet the County's standards. Mr Earman did not have a problem with it, but wanted to refer that to Mr Turner. Toby Turner, general manager of the Fair, asked if the staff would do everything so it was not necessary to pay a CPA firm, and Commissioner Adams felt there was agreement because the County just wanted to make sure there was accountability. Mr Turner advised he assumed the general manager position in 1996. There are two individuals who are compensated on the event and he displayed figures for the Board to see. He advised that the budget for the Fair is $134,000 whether it opens or not; that was his cost to run the event. Salaries are paid to him as the manager ($5,000) and the treasurer ($2,500). There is a set aside for possible office assistance, but sometimes a bank will donate their assistance. They have a contract electrician, pay for sanitation, contract labor for security and standbys to cover firefighters' time at the station when they are required to work the fairground. A donation is given to the people who assist in the parking lot for traffic control, security and law enforcement, and incentives for contract labor such as shirts, hats, and meals to compensate the volunteers. In the past, the report that is required by the State and prepared by Becky Colton has also been provided to the County. He asked for questions. County Attorney Bangel had a question about who takes the tickets or who runs the admission process, and Mr Earman advised this was the next point he had wanted to address after the audit issue was concluded. Mr. Earman went on to say emphatically that they had no problem with someone coming in to look at the operation, the books, or the records, it was all open for public review. February 13, 2001 BKH]PGI62 150 County Attorney Bangel requested a copy of the budget for the record. (COPIES OF FIREFIGHTERS FAIR BUDGET AND CASH FLOW REPORT FOR 1999/2000 ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) Commissioner Adams felt there was no problem if a couple of words could be changed, and County Attorney Bangel read them the statutory requirement for an annual review for a 25,000 or more persons fair which shall be made by 'a qualified accountant licensed by the state." Commissioner Adams understood that the report done by Becky Colton would satisfy that requirement, and Assistant Administrator Baird pointed out that a "review" is a lower form of an audit and he would have no problem with it remaining a review since the quotes for a professional audit are so expensive. Therefore the language would reflect that a State - certified public accountant would conduct a review of the association. They will make certain all funds have been accounted for before submitting the final information. Mr Earman was unsure whether the County would want their staff out at the Fair every night, and Commissioner Adams pointed out there is a big difference between the association paying $9,000 for the use of the Fairgrounds and the sharing a third of the profit and it is important to the County that they are profitable. Mr. Earman pointed out that the same contract had served both the County and the Association for several years, but Commissioner Adams reminded him that it was not only the flood that wiped out the fair, but also the parties for the volunteers that raised the red flags and those were cut down. Commissioner Adams further pointed out the funding and guarantees provided by the State which assist and protect to make sure it is a good fair. Commissioner Adams thought the County would feel better and have a comfort level knowing that our internal audit/finance staffers have looked at it and are comfortable with February 13, 2001 151 Br( 117PG163 the way everything is tracked. It was mutually agreed that under paragraph 6, that a two- part numbered ticket system would not be required. County Attorney Bangel asked if statutory language "based on sound accounting practices and procedures, of the Association" could be added to track the Statute, and Mr. Earman thought there would be no objection as long as it was in line with what the State requires. Chairman Ginn understood that all the problem areas were covered, and Mr Earman added that the Association still owes the County about $8,000 and they would be cutting a check very soon. Commissioner Adams thought the addition ofthe building would make the event more profitable and the outdoor pavilion would be coming along soon to allow outdoor displays. She would be more comfortable if the extension service was to move forward with more home economics that she has not been seeing as part of the fair. She felt it needed to be addressed. She praised the Association for a good job, It is a very nice family event, and traffic control and cleanliness of the grounds are exceptional. There is not a fair elsewhere in the state that can hold a candle to what they do. Mr Earman appreciated the compliments. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the agreement with the Indian River County Fair Association, Inc., with the changes as discussed (reviews not audits, addition of language based on sound accounting practices, and no requirement for two-part tickets), and authorized the Chairman to execute the same. February 13, 2001 BR 117 PG 161 152 Dena Smith, whose family has resided in this county since 1890, advised that she was president of Indian River County Youth Livestock Association and there are a lot of concerned parents regarding the mandatory health check with the veterinarian which is scheduled for Saturday. The lease needs to be signed so this can be put behind them because the Fair is only 3 weeks away. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 13.B.1. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - NORTH BARRIER ISLAND RE-EVALUATION The Board reviewed her Memorandum below: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge SUBJECT: North Barrier Island Re-evaluation J0 There have been a number of issues raised over the past year about incompatible in the zoning designations north of CR 510. I would like this Commission to authorize a county -initiated rezoning of multiple -zoned parcels on the barrier island north of CR 510. ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized a county -initiated rezoning of the multiple -family zoned parcels on the barrier island north of CR 510. 13.13.2. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - JUNGLE TRAIL GREENWAY UPDATE The Board reviewed a Memorandum as follows: February 13, 2001 153 BK 11 7 FG 165 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge SUBJECT: Jungle Trail Greenway Update Over the past year, we have had tremendous development pressure south of CR 510 on Jungle Trail. Many of these developers have not lived up to their promises or their plans. County staff has spend many many man-hours onsite and on the telephone concerning their many violations. The northern part of Jungle Trail, where changes are also taking place, is a much more positive experience. At the last regular meeting of the Historic Resource Advisory Committee, the environmental planning staff provided a brief update of the Trail and I would to request a more in-depth presentation by staff at one of our future Commission meetings. I hope that is the consensus of this Board Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that this matter was discussed earlier in conjunction with 11.A.2. on this agenda and a report from staff will be on the February 20`h agenda concerning the status of development projects adjacent to Jungle Trail. (Clerk's Note: The item on 2/20/01 was deferred due to the absence of Vice Chairman Stanbridge who was ill and due to time constraints that morning.) 13.B.3. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - LOST TREE ISLAND - UPDATE ON RESULTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND CITIZENS APPEARANCE BEFORE GOVERNOR JEB BUSH AND HIS CABINET ON FEBRUARY 6, 2001 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 2001: To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: February 7, 2001 Subject: LOST TREE ISLAND UPDATE From: Ruth M. Stanbridge v l L Commissioner �f I would like to update the Board regarding the Governor's Cabinet Meeting held in Tallahassee on Tuesday, February 6 2001 concerning Lost Tree Islands. February 13, 2001 154 B1<11 7 PG 166 Vice Chairman Stanbridge was sure that everyone had heard that the County was successful in having the proposed agreement with the state withdrawn on Tuesday, February 6, 2001, in Tallahassee. She thought the County needed to work on the issues and suggested it would be best to assign a point person. She volunteered to be that person. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, to accept Vice Chairman Stanbridge's offer and assign her to be the point person in the Lost Tree Island matter. Chairman Ginn inquired how this appointment would affect the LAAC and the Chairman, and Commissioner Macht advised that the offer to purchase the islands has never been withdrawn. He saw no conflict with Vice Chairman Stanbridge if the Board wanted to appoint her as long as any proposals are referred back to the LAAC. Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought it would be a while before it got to that point. Commissioner Macht agreed. He reported that he heard in Tallahassee about a property trade between FIND and Lost Tree. If he had been properly informed, FIND had traded away a County park. If this was true, he wanted to reopen the whole thing. Chairman Ginn agreed the matter needed to be reopened and that a letter needed to be sent to FIND to learn the facts and why it was done without the County Commission being notified. Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought the park is owned by FIND, but the County maintains it. Commissioner Macht advised of another big shock that a former member of the FIND Board of Directors testified on behalf of Lost Tree Village. Chairman Ginn thought the Statute required them to notify the County and she February 13, 2001 155 BK 117 PG 167 believed that was not done. Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that the matter on February 6" had to do with only the settlement offer. Everything else is still on. She got the distinct impression that the Governor and Cabinet were trying to find ways that they could buy the islands which is what should occur. Locally, we have kept the density low. Perhaps they need to consider what the State might want to do with the islands and that was the area she wished to pursue. Chairman Ginn thought the Board has been criticized for their approach to Lost Tree. She thought it was time to seek a resolution for the betterment of the community. Our guidelines call for a property that is in imminent threat of development to be given the highest priority. She thought that under the circumstances the County needed to move the Lost Tree Islands into the #1 position on our land acquisition list. She asked what might have a higher priority. Commissioner Macht responded with the Lowenstein-Salama property. Commissioner Adams responded that we need a willing seller and consideration of the appraised value. Chairman Ginn claimed that "10% above appraised value" is not in the County's guidelines, and Commissioner Macht replied that it was basic County policy. Chairman Ginn has heard from her constituents since returning from Tallahassee that the Board must move forward to claim the islands and somehow get them into public ownership. Commissioner Adams suggested they let the State do that. Chairman Ginn thought the State would wait to see what the County was going to do and reminded the Board that there is still another $11 million bond issue available. Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought perhaps she ought to withdraw her offer. Commissioner Macht felt they had forgotten why they went to Tallahassee which was February 13, 2001 BK 1 1 7 FG 166 156 to tell the Cabinet members to set aside the so-called settlement and let the courts finish their deliberations. We still do not know what we are negotiating. Chairman Ginn thought it necessary to work on this to see if an agreement can be reached with the State and Lost Tree to get the islands under public ownership. If that is not the goal, then she needed to know the direction Vice Chairman Stanbridge was planning to take before she could support the motion. She brought up a letter that had been written concerning a DCA settlement wherein it stated that it was not feasible or desirable for the County to purchase the islands. Vice Chairman Stanbridge defended the letter as being appropriate at the time and under the conditions, but Chairman Ginn thought this had polarized the community. Chairman Ginn believed they have not kept faith with the public and the islands have been minimized on the LAAC priority list. She found it difficult to understand why the others objected to proceeding in this way when the islands are under direct threat of development. Commissioner Tippin called for the question. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried 4-1 (Chairman Ginn opposed). Chairman Ginn stated this vote did not preclude her, as Chairman, from doing things on her own which she has already undertaken as of last week. She was not at liberty to relate what those things were. 13.D. COMMISSIONER MACHT - PURCHASE HUD OWNED HOME FOR ONE DOLLAR - 584 5TH STREET SW, VERO BEACH Commissioner Macht reviewed the information below. He advised that he had seen the home and it was in a very nice neighborhood and recommended the Board approve the February 13, 2001 157 BK 117 PG 169 purchase for $1 and assign it at least temporarily to the Human Services Department. dollar homes ;0 n us department of housing and urban development HUD'S NEW DOLLAR HOMES INITIATIVE WILL SELL HOMES TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR $1 EACHI HUD launched its new "Dollar Homes" initiative to sell local govemments thousands of HUD -owned homes for $1 each to create housing for families in need and to revitalize neighborhoods. Under the policy, single-family homes that are acquired in foreclosure actions by the Federal Housing Administration (which is part of HUD) will be eligible for sale to local govemments around the nation for $1 each when the homes have been listed for sale for at least six months and remain unsold. Over 1,000 homes will initially be eligible for sale to local govemments under the initiative, with additional homes available for sale each week. HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo and Congressman John Kasich of Ohio announced the new HUD Dollar Home initiative on March 1, which officially begins May 1 2000. "The Dollar Homes policy will build better futures for hundreds of communities and thousands of families across our nation," Secretary Cuomo said at the announcement. "It will help reverse decades of decline in our cities by revitalizing neighborhoods, attracting new residents, and promoting homeownership." Content Int =dined: Juno 19. 2000 Beginning May 1st, 2000, HUD will allow local govemments to purchase HUD -owned homes for $1 each to create housing for families in need and to benefit neighborhoods, through its Dollar Homes initiative. Under the policy, single-family homes that are acquired in foreclosure actions by the Federal Housing Administration (which is part of HUD) will be eligible for sale to local govemments around the nation for $1 each whenever FHA is unable to sell the homes for six months. By selling vacant homes for $1 after six months on the market, HUD will make it possible for communities to fix up the homes and put them to good use at a considerable savings. The newly occupied homes can then act as catalysts for neighborhood revitalization, attracting new residents and businesses to an area. February 13, 2001 BK117PG170 Local govemments can partner with local non-profit homeownership organizations or tap into existing local programs to resell the homes to low- and moderate -income residents of the community. The local govemments will be required to purchase the properties and convey them to the nonprofit organizations for rehabilitation and resale to first-time homebuyers. Over one thousand properties are currently available and new houses will be added on a weekly basis. To find out if properties are available for sale in your community, visit and click on your state to find out where homes are located. For detailed program information on HUD's Dollar Homes, read the Off HUD Homes for Sale Ice of Housing Notice (pdf liis). Content lot modified: May 1, 2000 Chairman Ginn inquired about back taxes, and stated the Commissioners needed to know more information about the particular house. Louise Hubbard, Director of Indian River Homeless Services Council, Inc., explained that the only expense to the County is the cost to transfer the title. All other expenses or searches are paid for in Maitland, Florida, as part of the new program which started last May. The program is called "HUD dollar homes '. The county can buy the house and make it available to a true not-for-profit organization which could find it possible to make it available in any equitable way. There is a deadline for the County to acquire this house or it will be back on the market the 15' of February, after which a developer can buy it for 30% under the appraised value. February 13, 2001 159 61t117PG171 Case No Address Bd/Ba Appraised Value Deadline 094 121959 584 5th Street SW VERO BEACH, FL 32962 Get Map , Lead Based Paint 2/1 $41 000 02/15/01 Chairman Ginn inquired about back taxes, and stated the Commissioners needed to know more information about the particular house. Louise Hubbard, Director of Indian River Homeless Services Council, Inc., explained that the only expense to the County is the cost to transfer the title. All other expenses or searches are paid for in Maitland, Florida, as part of the new program which started last May. The program is called "HUD dollar homes '. The county can buy the house and make it available to a true not-for-profit organization which could find it possible to make it available in any equitable way. There is a deadline for the County to acquire this house or it will be back on the market the 15' of February, after which a developer can buy it for 30% under the appraised value. February 13, 2001 159 61t117PG171 MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, to approve the purchase of the dwelling at 584 5th Street SW, Vero Beach under the HUD "Dollar Homes" initiative to create housing for families in need and to revitalize neighborhoods County Attorney Bangel interjected to make certain the Commissioners were aware that the contract has an addendum concerning lead based paint. Ms. Hubbard explained this HUD disclaimer is in all the contracts for properties over 20 years that they have the potential to have lead based paint. County Attorney Bangel if the County does acquire the property, there will be other statutory requirements. It was established that the short time frame covered acquisition only, not closing. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. COPY OF SALES CONTRACT AND OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners ofthe Emergency Services District. Those minutes are being prepared separately. February 13, 2001 160 BK 117 PG 172 14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT The Chairman announced that following the Emergency Services District meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are being prepared separately. There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 1:16 p.m. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Caroline D Ginn, Chairman Minutes approved February 13, 2001 BKII7PGI73