HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/19/2002•
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2002 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
•
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chaituian
John W. Tippin, Vice Chaiiuian
Fran B. Adams
Caroline D. Ginn
Kenneth R. Macht
District 2
District 4
District 1
District 5
District 3
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1.
2.
3.
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. Ruth M. Stanbridge
BACKUP
PAGES
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add backup pages to Item 9.B.2.
2. Add Item 11.C., Main Library Renovations - Bill Bryant & Associates - Change Order #1
3. Add replacement pages 125 and 133 to backup for Item 11.E.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation of Invitation to 6th Annual Inter-Tnbal Vero
Beach Pow Wow
B. United Way Drawing for County Employees
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of January 15, 2002
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated February 7, 2002)
E Ic 1'? 1Q
1
2-11
CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
B. Golf Ball Retrieval Agreement
(memorandum dated February 11, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGES
12-16
Proclamation for HAC 17
Resignation of Philip J. Mank, Jr. from the Public Library
Advisory Board and the Space Needs Committee
(memorandum dated Febn'ary 11, 2002)
Sebastian Representative to the Parks & Recreation
Committee
(memorandum dated February 12, 2002)
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated February 7, 2002) 22-23
Grant Extension for Harriet & Harry Moore Little League
Park LLI Project No. M99048 Old Fellsmere School
($150,000)
(memorandum dated February 13, 2002)
Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for
Lot 16, Block 20, Vero Lake Estates, Unit 4
(memorandum dated February 7, 2002)
Compliance and Restoration Bonding for Carriage Lake
at Vero L C
(memorandum dated February 12, 2002)
Developer's Agreement with Emerald Estates Subdivision
for Force Main Installation on 45th St., west of 58th Avenue
(memorandum dated January 31, 2002)
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Grand Harbor LTD Request for Abandonment of
a 6 Foot Wide Strip of Via Marbella Boulevard
Right -of -Way Within Grand Harbor
(Legislative)
PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.):
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.):
2. Channing Corporation's Request to Modify
Certain Approved Conceptual PD Plan Setbacks
for a Portion of the Old Orchid PD Project
(Legislative)
(memorandum dated February 11, 2002)
PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request by Mark Grossman to speak concerning
the Vero Lake Estates Drainage Project
(letter dated February 12, 2002)
Request by Chris Kirrie to speak concerning
Kirrie Access to Sembler Property
(no backup provided)
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
BACKUP
PAGES
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
Bruce Barkett's Appeal of a Road Paving Condition of
the Chestnut Contractors Trades Facility Site Plan
(memorandum dated February 12, 2002)
Emergency Services
Approval of Service Agreements for E911 Public Safety
Answering Point (PSAP) Logging Recorders on a Sole
Source Basis from Replay Systems, Inc.
(memorandum dated February 7, 2002)
General Services
None
Leisure Services
None
109-124
Office of Management and Budget
Comprehensive Policy for Funding Outside Agencies
(memorandum dated February 12, 2002)
125-155
BACKUP
PAGES
Public Works
1. Second Amendment to the Professional Services
Agreement for 66th Avenue from 4th Street to SR60
(memorandum dated February 11, 2002)
?. As -Built Resolution & Assessment Roll for Paving
and Drainage Improvements to 19th Avenue SW
between 10th St. SW and 9th St. SW and Portions of
10th St. SW between 20th Ave. SW & 18th Ave. SW
(memorandum dated January 31, 2002)
156-162
163-170
Utilities
None
Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Updates
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
BACKUP
PAGES
Solid Waste Disposal District
None
Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00
p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m.
Meeting broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
5.A. Invitation to 6th Annual Inter -Tribal Vero Beach Pow Wow - February 22-
24, 2002 - Indian River County Fairgrounds -2-
5 B United Way Drawing for County Employees -4-
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 15, 2002
CONSENT AGENDA -5-
7.A. List of Warrants -5-
7 B Sandridge Golf Club - Golf Ball Retrieval Agreement - Golf Ball Graphic
LLC -12-
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
7.C. Proclamation in Honor of Richard Stark - Homeless Services -13-
7.D. Public Library Advisory Board and Space Needs Committee - Resignation
of Philip J. Mank, Jr. -14-
7 E Parks & Recreation Committee - Appointment of Julianne Barrett as
Representative of the City of Sebastian -15-
7.F. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs -16-
7.G. Harry and Harriet Moore Little League Park LLI Project #M99048 - Old
Fellsmere School - Bureau of Design & Recreation Services, Department
of Environmental Protection, Grant Extension -18-
7.H. MGB Construction (Cortez) - Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver -
Lot 16, Block 20, Vero Lake Estates, Unit 4 -19-
7.I. Carriage Lake at Vero, L C - Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement for
Compliance and Restoration Bonding -21-
7.J. Demetree-Indian River, LLC - Emerald Estates Subdivision (f/k/a Tyler
Place) - Developer's Agreement for Force Main Installation on 45th Street
West of 58`h Avenue -22-
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2002-013 PROVIDING FOR THE
CLOSING, ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF A
6' WIDE PORTION OF VIA MARBELLA BOULEVARD WITHIN THE
GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT AND RESERVING THE ENTIRE
RIGHT-OF-WAY AS A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT -24-
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-2-
Jr
3 LI
•
4
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - CHANNING CORPORATION (KENNEDY GROVES,
INC.) OLD ORCHID PD PROJECT - REQUEST TO MODIFY CERTAIN
APPROVED CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN SETBACKS (FRONT YARD
SETBACKS ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROJECT) -31-
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - MARK GROSSMAN - VERO LAKE
E STATES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. RE• VERO LAKE
E STATES DRAINAGE PROJECT -36-
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - CHRIS KIRRIE - RE: ACCESS TO
SEMBLER PROPERTY -40-
11.A. CHESTNUT CONTRACTORS TRADES FACILITY SITE PLAN - KEN
CHESTNUT (ATTORNEY BRUCE BARKETT) - APPEAL OF ROAD
PAVING CONDITION - 12TH AVENUE SW AND 8TH STREET SW -45-
11.B. EMR TECIINOLOGIES D/B/A REPLAY SYSTEMS, INC. - SERVICE
AGREEMENTS FOR E911 PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINT (PSAP)
RACAL WORDNET LOGGING RECORDERS - SOLE SOURCE BASIS -
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF AND CITY OF VERO BRACH POLICE
DEPARTMENT -51-
11.C. MAIN LIBRARY RENOVATIONS - BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES -
CHANGE ORDER #11 -52-
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
1 2 {3
•
-3-
z
11E
11.G.1.
11.G.2.
FUNDING POLICY FOR OUTSIDE AGENCIES (STATE,
NONPROFIT, CHILDREN'S SERVICES, QUASI -NONPROFIT, AND
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT) -54-
CARTER ASSOCIATES - 2ND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES - 66TH AVENUE
FROM 4TH STREET TO SR -60 -59-
RESOLUTION 2002-014 CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR
CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 19TH
AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW AND
PORTIONS OF 10TH STREET SW BETWEEN 20TH AVENUE SW AND
18TH AVENUh SW, DESIGNATED AS PROJECT NO. 9911, AND
OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT
-61-
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - REPORT ON TRIP TO
TALLAHASSEE - (1) STORMWATER PLAN - (2) REDISTRICTING -
(3) HALLSTROM FARMSTEAD ON NATIONAL REGISTER - (4)
AMTRAK
-67-
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT -67-
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-4-
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT -68-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD -68-
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
February 19, 2002
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman; John
W. Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also
present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Stanbridge called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Reverend Ray Scent, Chaplain of Indian River Memorial Hospital, delivered the
Invocation.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
it k{ J 0
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Stanbridge led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Stanbridge requested 3 changes to today's Agenda:
1. Item 9.B.2., backup supplied.
Add Item 11.C., Main Library Renovations - Bill Bryant & Associates -
Change Order #11
Item 11 E , add replacements for Pages 125 and 133.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously made the above changes to the
Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
S.A. INVITATION TO 6m ANNUAL INTER -TRIBAL VERO BEACH POW WOW -
FEBRUARY 22-24, 2002 - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
rs
•
,Y
J*__RO 8E406,
T ' T
E_RECREATION E
C DEPARTMENT C
Sh.ithflt�r.tib&.n
iERt•BEACH:
Pow WOW... HI
�►
ii
FEBRUARY 22, 23, 24, 2002
Indian River County Fairgrounds
North on 58th Avenue off Rt. 60, then 7 miles
Vero Beach, Florida
A NATIVE AMERICAN EVENT PUBI,TC TS INVITED TO ATTEND
Native American Dancing
Native American Arts & Crafts
Creek Encampment, Tipi Exhibit
Food Vendors, Face Painting, Seminars
Flute Playing, Storytelling
Wildlife Exhibit
Host Drum
Thunderhorse Singers
of Oklahoma
Master of Ceremony
Osceola Red Shirt
Arena Director
Daniel Tramper
Head Man
Al Wlnterha wk
Head Lady
Susan Logan
Head Boy
Billy Kipp
Head Girl
Amanda. Lowery
Head Gourd Singer
Ron Gibson
Head Gourd Dancer
Ed LaFave
Color Guard
All Nations Warrior Society
Living Historian
Jim Sawg-rase
Flute Player
Tommy Wildcat
Entertainer/Singer
David White Wolf Tievak
Flute Player/Storyteller
Ed. Wind Dancer
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-3-
Friday, 2/22 School Day 9:30am - 1:30pm
Open to Public 3:OOpm - 10:30pm
Saturday, 2/23 - 11:00pna
Sunday, 2/24 10:00am - 5:30pm
Grand Entry Times:
Fri. 7:30pm
Sat. 2:30 & 7:3Opm
Sun 2 OOpm
ADULTS:
STUDENTS (5-18):
SENIORS:
CHILDREN UNDER 5:
MILITARY IN UNIFORM
$5.00
$2.00
$2.00
FREE
FREE
Arena Under Cover Held Ram or Shine
No Drugs, Alcohol or Pets
Buses Welcome
HOST HOTEL
VERO BEACH RESORT
formerly Super 8 / Days Inn
8800 20th Street
(20th St. same as Rt. 60 1/2 mi East of I-96)
Vero Beech, Fl 32966
Phone: 561-662-9991
call for powwow coupon for special rate
(coupon on back of flyer)
POW WOW INFORMATION
561-567-1579
Vendors and Traders by invitation only
Guest Drums Welcome
Free primitive camping for participants
RV Parking and hook-ups - $20 per night for
participants
Sponsored by the Teen Escape Council of the
Vero Beach/ Indian River County Recreation
Department (a non-profit organization)
RR 1
72
•
Jerry Summers of the Vero Beach Recreation Department invited everyone to the
6th Annual PowWow to be held at the Fairgrounds and introduced some of the Sky Eagle
Dancers.
Becka Sherman, Senior Princess; Courtney Young; and Donovan Chesser invited
the public to the Pow Wow, and Melissa Young, the youngest dancer, passed out free
tickets to the Board.
Commissioner Adams congratulated the Teen Escape Council on the wonderful
results of their efforts and professionalism.
S.B. UNITED WAY DRAWING FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES
Jim Romanek, Parks Superintendent, announced that United Way had reached its goal
of 1.6 million dollars for this year's campaign. Indian River County employees gave a total
of $18,037. He congratulated the employees who did a wonderful job and thanked
Commissioner Macht who acted as Chair of the County's campaign.
Commissioner Macht emphasized that Jim did all the work and did a fantastic job.
Mr Romanek then announced that the County had 80 new first-time givers. He
presented the following awards to the following employees:
1. First Time Giver Award of a Night Out
at the AMC Movie Theater Anne Moutenot, North
County Library
2. Gift Certificate to Chili's Joseph Gabbert, Road &
Bridge
3. Gift Certificate to Applebee's James Norman, Parks
Department
4. Gift Certificate to Ruby Tuesday's Sharon Franks, Road &
Bridge
5. Gift Certificate to T.G.I. Friday's Dorothea Clarke, SWDD
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-4-
E,
•
6. Night Out at AMC Movie Theater James Hobbs,
SWDD/Recycling
7 Gift Certificate to Atlantic Grill Otto Bloomingburg, Golf
Course
8. Day Off With Pay Seth Woodiwiss, Parks
Department
9. GRAND PRIZE - 3 Days Off With Pay Kevin Hansen, Engineering
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 15, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of January 15, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
January 15, 2002, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Tippin requested that Item 7.J. be separated for discussion.
7.A. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 2002:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-5-
nit
De
•
•
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: February 7, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of February 1, 2001 to February 7, 2002.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for February 1-7, 2002, as
recommended by staff.
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
O 021576
O 021577
O 021578
0021579
O 021580
0021581
0021582
O 021583
0021584
0021585
O 021586
0021587
O 021588
0021589
O 021590
0021591
O 317321
O 317322
O 317323
O 317324
O 317325
O 317326
O 317327
O 317328
O 317329
O 317330
O 317331
O 317332
O 317333
0317334
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
IRS - ACS
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
NACO/SOUTHEAST
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
FL SDU
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE
BREVARD TITLE, INC
AT&T WIRELESS
ACE PLUMBING, INC
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
ATLAS PEN & PENCIL CORP
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
ABS PUMPS, INC
ACS COURIER SERVICE
ARCHIVE PUBLISHING
A T & T
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
CHECK
DATE
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-01
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
t
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,125.89
138.50
37.75
115.38
50.00
50.00
639.86
2,500.00
79,663.47
204.48
9,866.05
316.69
132.46
7,937.45
162.86
602.34
27.82
865.00
123.00
930.00
129.49
655.27
20.16
69.83
475.08
913.98
482.63
95.00
190.00
101.03
•
O 31733.5
O 317336
0317337
O 317338
O 317339
O 317340
O 317341
O 317342
O 317343
O 317344
O 317345
O 317346
O 317347
O 317348
O 317349
O 317350
O 317351
O 317352
0317353
O 317354
O 317355
O 317356
O 317357
O 317358
O 317359
O 317360
O 317361
O 317362
O 317363
O 317364
O 317365
O 317366
O 317367
O 317368
O 317369
O 317370
O 317371
O 317372
O 317373
O 317374
O 317375
O 317376
O 317377
O 317378
O 317379
O 317380
O 317381
O 317382
O 317383
0317384
O 317385
O 317386
O 317387
O 317388
O 317389
0317390
O 317391
O 317392
0317393
O 317394
O 317395
O 317396
ABRAMSON, GEORGE
ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
ARAMA.RK UNIFORM SERVICES
A T & T
APOLLO ENTERPRISES
AIR COMPRESSOR WORKS INC
AMERICAN WATER CHEMICALS INC
AMERITREND HOMES
ADVANCETEC INDUSTRIES INC
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
ARNOLD WALKER PAINTING
BARTH CONSTRUCTION
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES, INC
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BURDOCK, JOHN
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
BROWN, DONALD JR
BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
BELLSOUTH
BEAZER HOMES, INC
BLANKEN, RICHARD
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
BRANDES, MICHAEL
B & S SOD INC
BLACKMON, SHANITA
BEST WESTERN SEMINOLE INN
BELLSOUTH
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CLARKE, DOROTHEA
CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO.
COMPLETE WET/DRY SANDBLASTING
COAST TO COAST JANITOR SERVICE
CAUDILL, LARRY
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CHUMP, INC.
COLUMBIA PROPANE
CALLAWAY GOLF BALL CO
CHOICE PROCESS -ORLANDO
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CLARRY, ALISON
CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS &
CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY
COASTAL BIO -SYSTEMS
COMPUTER MANAGEMENT CORP
COASTAL SUDS -N -SHINE CAR WASH
CEMCO CONSTRUCTION
CAL BUILDERS, INC
CALIFORNIA OAKS STATE BANK
CUNNINGHAM, RICHARD MD
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
250.00
6.79
1,083.99
7,510.01
131.52
1,491.29
229.55
59,562.75
2,000.00
297.50
196.00
1,211.00
39,974.00
4,202.69
173,534.55
1,649.75
207.36
1,639.67
1,785.79
87.87
30.85
12.70
234.50
517.75
5,397.57
1,500.00
20.00
35.38
1,482.00
150.00
82.40
172.50
277.32
3,359.36
2,534.75
2,500.00
30,179.63
20.88
237,253.00
2,942.74
24,691.00
400.00
585.00
40.00
199.50
566.51
7,908.47
74.19
191.54
80.00
529.04
31.31
25.00
141.00
19,917.72
266.00
2,006.25
500.00
1,327.50
500.00
74.90
350.00
•
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
R 0�+
L
-7-
O 317397
O 317398
O 317399
O 317400
O 317401
O 317402
O 317403
O 317404
O 317405
O 317406
O 317407
O 317408
O 317409
O 317410
O 317411
O 317412
O 317413
O 317414
O 317415
O 317416
O 317417
0317418
O 317419
O 317420
O 317421
O 317422
O 317423
O 317424
O 317425
O 317426
O 317427
O 317428
O 317429
O 317430
O 317431
O 317432
O 317433
O 317434
O 317435
O 317436
O 317437
0317438
O 317439
O 317440
O 317441
O 317442
O 317443
O 317444
O 317445
O 317446
O 317447
O 317448
O 317449
O 317450
O 317451
O 317452
O 317453
O 317454
O 317455
O 317456
O 317457
O 317458
O 317459
O 317460
O 317461
O 317462
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
DAVES COMMUNICATIONS
DEMCO INC
D ICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
D IRECTOR, KENNETH L MD PA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
DUN & BRADSTREET
DUVAL FORD
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DANGERFIELD, DAVID
DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE
DADE PAPER COMPANY
FEDEX
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
D ILLARD, CASSIE
DOWNING, DALE
D ELGADO, ANDRES
D IGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC
D -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
EXPRESS REEL GRINDING, INC
ELPEX, INC
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONSULTANTS
EVERGLADES FARM
ELECTRO -NUMERICS INC
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FOOTJOY
FLOWERS
FLORIDA
FWPC
ASSOCIATION OF
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
RURAL WATER
BAKING COMPANY OF
TIRE RECYCLING, INC
O A
FLOW -TECHNOLOGY
FRAZIER, JOHN
FLORIDA HUMANITIES COUNCIL
FALZONE, KATHY
FENIMORE, CHARLES
FACTICON, INC
FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
FIRSTLAB
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
FRENCH, GEORGE
FLOYD, IRA MD
FLORIDA GFC-NGWTF
FIRTH, KERRY
CASALINA, NICHOLAS
GALE GROUP, THE
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
GOULD, COOKSEY,FENNELL,O'NEILL
GALL'S INC
G IFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE
GOULD, COOKSEY,FENNELL,O'NEILL
G E CAPITAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE
POWELL, ELIZABETH GAMBINO
G IANNELLI MELONEY
GOULD, COOKSEY,FENNEL, ONEIL,
H W WILSON CO
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-8-
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
291.36
48.89
877.21
4,457.69
29.00
65.72
134.88
9.50
46,428.00
3,084.40
18.00
625.00
732.23
38.65
171.26
38.62
500.00
77.70
194.00
47.50
600.00
4,553.42
2,821.03
5.00
362.14
430.31
20.33
200.00
1,141.45
20,551.93
50.00
1,252.05
130.58
787.50
350.00
167.01
8.80
20.00
91.93
270.00
1,875.00
21.00
2,915.83
553.93
589.00
1,035.35
25.00
18,590.76
12.50
17.50
500.00
20.00
556.21
360.68
1,214.25
21,169.00
77.88
12,654.28
26,169.00
167.61
86.65
117.70
21,169.00
99.75
10,440.00
1,126.55
I PG
nv. r..4 «a
/ E
.) La d
•
O 317463
O 317464
0317465
O 317466
O 317467
O 317468
O 317469
O 317470
0317471
O 317472
O 317473
O 317474
O 317475
O 317476
O 317477
O 317478
O 317479
0317480
O 317481
O 317482
0317483
0317484
0317485
O 317486
0317487
O 317488
O 317489
O 317490
O 317491
O 317492
O 317493
O 317494
O 317495
0317496
O 317497
O 317498
O 317499
O 317500
O 317501
O 317502
O 317503
O 317504
O 317505
0317506
0317507
O 317508
0317509
O 317510
O 317511
O 317512
O 317513
O 317514
O 317515
O 317516
O 317517
0317518
O 317519
O 317520
0317521
O 317522
0317523
O 317524
O 317525
O 317526
O 317527
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
HERCULES INC
HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
HAYHURST, WILLIAM
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
HOLMES, IDA
HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL
HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
HURLEY,ROGNER,MILLER,COX AND
HARRIGAN, TEANNA
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
IRC COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY
IFAS PUBLICATIONS
JELMBY, PETER
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
JEFFERSON, CHRISTOPHER A
JANWAY COMPANY
JONES, ELVIN JR
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
KOMARNICKI, WALTER SR
KELLY, JULIE ANN
KNAPP, EUGENE E JR
KELLY'S DIESEL SERVICE
KUESTERSTEFFEN, MIKE
KEMIRON INC
LENGEMANN OF FLORIDA, INC
LESCO, INC
LOS ANGELES DODGERS, INC
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
L B SMITH, INC
L IGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
LABOR FINDERS
LANDFILL SERVICE CORPORATION
LOPRESTI, ETTA
LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC
LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO
MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY
MARPAN SUPPLY COMPANY, INC
MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP
MILNER INC
MOSS, HENDERSON, BLANTON &
MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
MATRX MEDICAL INC
MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
MARC INDUSTRIES
MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
MIDLANTIC DATA SYSTEMS INC
MERCEDES HOMES INC
MEDIA BASICS VIDEO
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-9-
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
574.00
3,528.00
1,439.25
750.00
500.00
2,500.00
95.70
4,858.66
321.05
8,713.51
25.75
150.00
559.00
24.64
191.53
1,963.51
82.75
297.50
3.00
1,322.50
48.70
397.60
20.00
32.00
500.00
2,568.47
60.00
361.58
118.45
57.42
165.00
337.50
500.00
13,349.22
225.00
1,103.08
70.00
233.60
250.00
2,147.66
2,654.93
651.00
4,530.67
192.59
116.00
233.28
3,112.43
79.39
360.00
296.75
456.06
43.09
8,957.50
219.30
73.21
1,075.43
27.65
125.00
2,133.17
4,752.00
1,000.00
76.84
47.48
23.70
1,006.29
0
•
O 317528 NAGY, BELA
O 317529 NU CO 2, INC
0317530 NOWLIN, TIAIRA
O 317531 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER LEARNING
0317532 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
0317533 OFFICE DEPOT, INC
0317534 OSCEOLA PHARMACY
O 317535
O 317536
O 317537
O 317538
0317539
O 317540
O 317541
0317542
O 3175
O 3175
O 3175
O 3175
O 3175
O 3175
O 31754
031755
O 31755
O 31755
031755
O 31755
O 31755
O 31755
031755
O 31755
O 31755
0317560
0317561
O 317562
0317563
O 317564
O 317565
O 317566
O 317567
O 317568
O 317569
O 317570
0317571
O 317572
O 317573
O 317574
O 317575
O 317576
O 317577
O 317578
O 317579
O 317580
O 317581
O 317582
O 317583
O 317584
O 317585
O 317586
O 317587
O 317588
O 317589
O 317590
O 317591
ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO
OFFICE DEPOT
PARENT CONSTRUCTION CO
PARKS RENTAL INC
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
POSTMASTER
PUBLIC DEFENDER
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
43 PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
44 PARRISH, JAMES L PE
45 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
46 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES, INC
47 PUBLIX PHARMACY #0642
48 PERSONNEL PLUS INC
9 PING, INC
0 P B S& J ANALYTICAL SERVICES
1 PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF
2 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING SVC
3 PESHA, JESSICA
4 PULSAFEEDER INC
5 PERKINS PHARMACY
6 PROFESSIONAL PROCESS SERVICE
7 QUALITY BOOKS, INC
8 RINGHAVER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
9 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
R & G SOD FARMS
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
REXFORD, JOHN
ROYAL, THOMAS
ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
RIVER'S END & WEST END NURSERY
RIZIO, HOWARD
ROCKWOOD CORPORATION, THE
SAFETY KLEEN
S COTT'S SPORTING GOODS
S EWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
REXEL SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
SEMBLER, CHARLES W
SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
S UBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
S UN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
S TORYTIME PRODUCTIONS
SOLINET
SMITH BROS CONT EQUIP
S YSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
S TEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
S TARCK, DONNA
S EBASTIAN, CITY OF
S EBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
S OUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY EQUIP
SANDY PINES
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-10-
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
114.55
17.85
25.75
1,125.00
1,180.97
5,490.74
248.72
4,545.00
12.30
500.00
1,949.25
82.11
15,000.00
5,228.48
500.00
158.90
1,824.25
5,101.00
500.00
179.90
570.00
282.77
10,788.00
810.44
636.53
38.62
419.44
165.83
45.00
39.60
921.25
464.80
200.00
99.00
348.46
500.00
135.72
213.67
975.00
252.57
922.90
277.00
1,774.82
149.23
285.60
34.41
316.91
196.95
45.00
50.85
34.99
167.12
6,801.92
626.25
163.66
314.12
146.89
341.73
681.03
27.26
8,803.99
2,234.81
908.70
635.00
L
•
O 317592 SUMMERLIN'S SEVEN SEAS
O 317593 SOUTHERN/ALARM PARTNERS
O 317594 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
O 317595 SOUTHERN COMPUTER SUPPLIES INC
0317596 SPHERTON CORP
O 317597 SHIVERS, OVID AND
O 317598 STORAGE SOLUTIONS
O 317599 SNOW, CATHY
O 317600 SYSINCT
O 317601 SEYMOUR, LINDA
O 317602 SUNNYTECH INC- FL
O 317603 STEPHENS, LARRY
O 317604 SQUARE TWO GOLF
O 317605 STRNAD CUSTOM BUILDERS INC
0317606 SEARS ASSOCIATE SERVICE CENTER
0317607 SHOW WHAT YOU KNOW PUBLISHING
0317608 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST
O 317609 TEEJAYS'
O 317610 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
0317611 TITLEIST
O 317612 TREASURE COAST REFUSE
O 317613 THOMSON LEARNING
O 317614 T A P SOD
O 317615 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST
O 317616 TREASURE COAST SPORTS
O 317617 THORRY, ANDREW
O 317618 TESTAMERICA INC
O 317619 UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA
0317620 UPSTART
O 317621
O 317622
O 317623
0317624
O 317625
O 317626
0317627
O 317628
O 317629
O 317630
O 317631
O 317632
O 317633
O 317634
O 317635
O 317636
O 317637
O 317638
O 317639
O 317640
O 317641
O 317642
O 317643
O 317644
O 317645
O 317646
O 317647
O 317648
O 317649
O 317650
O 317651
0317652
O 317653
O 317654
O 317655
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
U S FILTER/DAVIS PRODUCTS
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
VETROL DATA SYSTEMS, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO COLLISION CENTER
VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN
VOICE STREAM WIRELESS
WALSH, LYNN
WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
WINN DIXIE STORES INC
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WINDOW SALES & SERVICE INC
WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC
WILSON, MARGARET F
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WATERVIEW PRESS INC
WALGREEN COMPANY
WALKER, KEITH
W C G, INC
WIDNER, BRADLEY J
WELLER POOL CONSTRUCTORS INC
WHITE, JOHN S
WEBSTER VETERINARY SUPPLY INC
XEROX CORPORATION
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-11-
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
E61
10,600.00
828.00
1,184.20
70.14
241.65
500.00
210.37
1,350.00
14,236.25
52.50
699.09
154.00
119.52
500.00
30.00
34.90
276.32
6.50
2,521.50
601.50
79.71
163.18
3,980.39
638.00
2,523.25
345.00
24.00
434.82
57.21
250.33
12,695.57
221.77
2,082.40
22,706.87
103.37
163.48
2,268.00
1,683.74
4,077.38
465.08
75.00
255.10
1,051.00
3,706.37
500.00
37.12
27.49
214.46
130.00
145.50
1,000.00
213.35
130.50
4,969.00
433.11
45.15
3,442.98
120.00
10,636.48
46.35
165,825.00
59.22
177.85
264.48
PG 0
•
O 317656
O 317657
0317658
O 317659
O 317660
O 317661
O 317662
O 317663
O 317664
O 317665
O 317666
O 317667
O 317668
O 317669
O 317670
O 317671
0317672
O 317673
O 317674
O 317675
O 317676
O 317677
O 317678
O 317679
O 317680
O 317681
O 317682
YOUNG, BRENDA
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZEPHYRHILLS NATURAL SPRING
MILLER, JOSEPH
WRIGHT, KA SACHBRENA
LUCAS, PAUL
BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION
R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
MASON, JILL K
FROST TRUSTEE, ANNE
ST LUCIE DEVELOPMENT CORP
WOLF, ALBERT & RENE
FONNER, WILLIAM L
AMERITREND HOMES
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC
SCHOFIELD, DONNA
SCHAMBACK, DOUGLAS
HAMILTON PLACE INC
WALKER, TARYN
MATOLEK, LISA E
CARALLO, SUSAN
JONES, GRAEME W
WILLIAMS, CARRIE
FREDDELL, CLINT R
STEEN, BOBBY
SAPP, CYNTHIA
HONEYBAKED HAM CO & CAFE
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
2002-02-07
15.00
45.64
9.50
64.78
5.11
41.30
75.50
38.74
43.52
116.94
44.13
55.95
30.03
43.02
103.64
66.43
41.21
48.17
28.59
44.40
54.72
64.11
21.28
9.24
15.06
43.01
50.65
1,422,256.50
7.B. SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB - GOLF BALL RETRIEVAL AGREEMENT - GOLF
BALL GRAPHIC LLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 11, 2002:
DATE:
TO:
THRU:
February 11, 2002
Honorable Members of Board of County Commissioners
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
SUBJECT: GOLF BALL RETRI VAL AGREEMENT
FROM: Bob Knmarinetz Dir th• • olf
BACKGROUND
In the past the Sandridge Golf Chub has utilized the services of a golf ball retrieval
company to retrieve the golf balls from the lakes on the golf courses. The most recent
agreement was with Mr. Tom Nelson d/b/a Wabasso Golf However Mr Nelson is no
longer able to perfoim such services. Mr. Nelson paid the Sandridge Golf Club five cents
commission for each golf ball he retrieved.
In the search for another company to perfoiiu this type of service, staff has received a
proposal from Golf Ball Graphic LLC. They have proposed to pay the Sandridge Golf
Club six cents commission for each golf ball retrieved. Staff feels that this is a good
proposal since it's been extremely difficult to even receive another proposal from any
other company doing this type of work.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-12-
Litt 7 9 Di
�Jis Lw v
•
•
Attached is a copy of the proposed contract Also attached are copies of necessary
insurance to perform the work.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners allow the Sandridge Golf
Club to enter into a Contract with Golf Ball Graphics LLC to do the golf ball retrieval
from the lakes on the golf courses per the teiuns of the attached Contract. Authorize the
Chaiiuman to sign to execute the contract.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the contract with Golf Ball
Graphics LLC to do the golf ball retrieval from the
lakes at Sandridge Golf Club and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended by
staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. C. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF RICHARD STARK - HOMELESS SERVICES
The Chairman entered the following Proclamation on the record:
PROCLAMATION
HONORING RICHARD A. STARK
WHEREAS, Richard A. Stark has become a visible, vocal and persistent advocate for the
homeless in our community, and for development of programs and services to meet their needs; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stark personally secured funds to resolve the homeless situation, supported the
Samaritan Center, and tirelessly lobbied the newspaper, City and County government, State legislature and
private donors for support for the development of services; and
WHEREAS, in 1999 Richard A. Stark established the Indian River County Task Force on the
Homeless, a County -wide cooperative effort to determine the needs of the homeless in Indian River County;
and
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
B1( 191
-13-
WHEREAS, in September of 2000 Richard A. Stark convened the Indian River Homeless Services
Council to carry on the work of the Task Force and to organize and manage a Continuum of Care. He
became the first Chairman of the Indian River Homeless Services Council, which now includes more than fifty
public and private service organizations local governments, private citizens, the business and banking
community, private foundations and faith -based organizations involved on behalf of the homeless people of
the community; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stark contributed significantly to the renovation and operation of a County -owned
building for use as a Homeless Resource Center with offices food pantry, centralized intake and centralized
referral, to minimize the need for homeless people with limited or no transportation to secure the services they
need.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board expresses its deep appreciation for the services Richard
A. Stark has performed on behalf of the homeless in Indian River County.
Dated this 19th day of February, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
hy)l. Tippin, Vire
Kenneth R. Macht qq
�tl,
7.D. PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD AND SPACE NEEDS COMMITTEE -
RESIGNATION OF PHILIP J. MANK, JR.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 11, 2002:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
•
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Reta Smith, Assistant to the Executive Aide
DATE. February 11, 2002
RE: Resignation of Philip J. Mank, Jr. from the Public Library
Advisory Board and the Space Needs Committee
As per the attached letters, Mr. Mank has submitted his resignation to
the Public Library Advisory Board (PLAB) and the Space Needs
Committee due to illness.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously accepted, with regret, the resignations
of Philip J. Mank, Jr. from the Public Library
Advisory Board and the Space Needs Committee.
7. E. PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE - APPOINTMENT OF JULIANNE
BARRETT AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 12, 2002:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-15-
BK1
•
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Reta Smith, Assistant to the Executive Aide
DATE: February 12, 2002
RE: Sebastian Representative to the Parks & Recreation Committee
Sebastian City Hall has advised us that their new representative to
the County Parks & Recreation Committee will be Julianne Barrett,
359 Tunison Lane, Sebastian, Florida 32958.
This is for information only, no Board action is required.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
7. F. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT -RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 2002:
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney'
William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney*
Madan E Fell, Assistant County Attorney
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
"Board Certified, City, County and Local Government Law
MEMORANDUM
:o. d of County Commissioners
4,'arta . Fell, Assistant County Attorney
February 7, 2002
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors for the weeks of
December 17, 2001 through January 28, 2002. Listed below are the vendors and the amount of each court -related
cost.
VENDOR:
G regory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Susan L. Chenault, Esq.
H ammond & Smith, P.A..
B erta B.H. Bauchrnan
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
PAYMENT TYPE:
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Guardianship Legal Services
Indigent Dependency Case
Court Interpreter
-16-
AMOUNT:
675.00
675.00
735.00
11,750.00
85.00
•
Alma Rosa Barajas
Patricia B. Held
Madge A. Bradford
Madge A. Bradford
Madge A. Bradford
Linda Seymour
Madge A. Bradford
Berta B. H. Bauchman
Berta B. H. Bauchman
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq
Alma Rosa Barajas
Evens Latortue
Suncoast Counseling
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Patricia B. Held
Evens Latortue
Medical Record Services
American Reporting
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Information &
Evidence
Alma Rosa Barajas
Alma Rosa Barajas
Atlantic Reporting
Global Translations
Maria E. Barrow
Evens Latortue
Monroe Co. Clerk
Patricia B. Held
American Reporting
Donald B. Edwards, DMD, P.A.
Medical Record Services
Karen Rushing, Clerk
Evens Latortue
Linda Seymour
Cristi Martin
Pamela G. Phelps
P amela G. Phelps
Berta B. H. Bauchman
U nishippers
Jiffy Photo
Unishippers
Unishippers
Unishippers
Medical Record Services
U nishippers
Suncoast Counseling
S uncoast Counseling
Suncoast Counseling
Suncoast Counseling
Suncoast Counseling
Norman A. Green, Esq.
Andrew B. Metcalf, Es.q
Berta B. H. Bauchman
Texas Dept. of Public Safety
Dept. of Transportation
Madge A. Bradford
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Janet C. Prosper
Cristi Martin
Linda Seymour
Patricia B. Held
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Court Interpreter
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Court Interpreter
Court Interpreter
P ublic Defender Conflicts
P ublic Defender Conflicts
Court Interpreter
Court Interpreter
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Transcription
Court Interpreter
S tate Attorney Costs
Transcription
Clinical Evaluation
State Attorney Costs
S tate Attorney Costs
Court Interpreter
Court Interpreter
Court Reporter
Court Interpreter
Court Interpreter
Court Interpreter
State Attorney Costs
Transcription
Transcription
S tate Attorney Costs
S tate Attorney Costs
S tate Attorney Costs
Court Interpreter
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Court Interpreter
S tate Attorney Costs
S tate Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
S tate Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney's Costs
S tate Attorney's Costs
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
Indigent as to Costs
Indigent as to Costs
Court Interpreter
S tate Attorney Costs
S tate Attorney Costs
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
40.00
77.00
168.00
122.50
192.50
119.00
168.00
40.00
40.00
900.00
9,000.00
40.00
40.00
687.50
450.00
360.50
40.00
46.34
111.00
675.00
42.41
175.00
40.00
40.00
425.00
313.00
25.00
40.00
6.00
94.50
27.00
72.00
12.80
7.00
40.00
98.00
59.50
31.50
63.00
40.00
13.14
28.00
14.04
10.14
13.14
23.49
19.22
537.50
537.50
500.00
500.00
662.50
696.76
467.17
40.00
10.00
3.00
45.50
112.00
42.00
45.50
101.50
87.50
77.00
•
n4.
3
-17-
Linda Seymour
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Linda Seymour
Rehman Technology Services
Maria Barrow
Total
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
State Attorney's Costs
Court Interpreter
cc: Honorable Paul B. Kanarek, Circuit Judge
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
52.50
325.50
171.50
273.00
3,480.00
40.00
$37,818.15
7.G. HARRY AND HARRIET MOORE LITTLE LEAGUE PARK LLI PROJECT
#M99048 - OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL - B UREA U OF DESIGN &
RECREATION SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION, GRANT EXTENSION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 13, 2002:
Date:
To:
Thru:
From:
Subject:
February 13, 2002
The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director --1/Z,z d it,
Grant Extension for Harriet & Harry Moore Little League Park
LLI Project No. M99048 Old Fellsmere School ($150,000)
BACKGROUND:
Attached, please find a letter from Linda D. Reeves with the Bureau of Design and Recreational
Services along with an Agreement to extend the existing grant for the Old Fellsmere School
($150,000). The extension would be a six-month extension to the existing grant and would
extend the grant to June 30, 2002.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the grant extension and authorize the Chaiuuan to
execute the amended agreement.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-18-
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Grant Extension and
authorized the Chairman to execute the Amendment
to the Agreement, as recommended by staff.
AMENDMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.11. MGB CONSTRUCTION (CORTEZ) - FLOODPLAIN CUT AND FILL
BALANCE WAIVER - LOT 16, BLOCK 20, VERO LAKE ESTATES, UNIT 4
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 2002:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH:
James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
AND
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P
County Engineer
FROM: David B. Cox. P.E., Civil EngineerQiec
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 16, Block 20,
Vero Lake Estates Unit 4
REFERENCE: Project No. 2002010118-29837
DATE: February 7, 2002
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-19-
CONSENT AGENDA
n
tiu
•
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
MGB Construction, Inc. has submitted a building permit application for a single-family residence on
the subject property. The site is located in an AE special flood hazard zone base flood elevation
23.0 ft N G V D In the attached letter from the applicant's engineer dated February 1, 2002, a
waiver of the cut and fill requirements is requested. The lot area is 1.08 acres. The volume of the
100 -year floodplain displaced by the proposed grading plan is estimated to be 873.8 cubic yards.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4. of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots located in the
Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit.
Alternative No. 1
Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4.
Alternative No. 2
Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the
proposed floodplain displacement.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from Ronald G. Keller, P.E., dated February 1, 2002.
2. Calculations for cut and fill
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously granted the cut and fill balance waiver
based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4, as
recommended by staff.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-20-
•
7.1. CARRIAGE LAKE AT VERO, L.C. - CASH DEPOSIT AND ESCROW
AGREEMENT FOR COMPLIANCE AND RESTORATION BONDING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 12, 2002:
Paul G. Bangel, County Attomey
William G. CoLins II, Deputy County Attorney*
Manan E Fell, Assistant County Attorney
*Board Certified, City, County and Local Government Law
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: (f9L William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney
DATE: February 12, 2002
SUBJECT: Compliance and Restoration Bonding for Carriage Lake at Vero,
L.C.
Prior to the issuance of a land development permit, Carriage Lake at Vero, L C
was required to post the necessary compliance and restoration bonds to
construct a lake within the existing approved planned development and to export
the fill from the site. Carriage Lake at Vero L C. has posted a cash bond in the
amount of $30,800 00 for compliance, a $12,300.00 cash bond for restoration,
and has executed a Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement No PD -00-09-04
(20010158) to guarantee compliance and restoration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement No. PD -00-09-04
(20010158) and authorize the Chairman of the Board to execute same.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-21-
)40
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Cash Deposit and Escrow
Agreement with Carriage Lake at Vero, L C and
authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.J. DEMETREE-INDIAN RIVER, LLC- EMERALD ESTATES SUBDIVISION
(F/K/A TYLER PLACE - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR FORCE MAIN
INSTALLATION ON 45TH STREET WEST OF 58TH AVENUE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 31, 2002:
DATE:
T0:
JANUARY 31, 2002
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COLTTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: W. ERIK OLSON
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY S VICES
PREPARED AARON J.BEP E „m i J
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL
AL ENGI'\EER ///�l
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
SUBJECT: DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT WITH EMERALD ESTATES SUBDIVISION
(FOR FORCE MAIN INSTALLATION ON 45Th STREET WEST OF 58Th
AVENUE)
BAC'KGROTIND & ANALYSIS
Emerald Estates (FICA Tyler Place) is a proposed subdivision located at 6120 45th Street. A master planned
force main had been scheduled to be constricted along 45th Street on an as -needed basis driven by development_
Through previous approved developer agreements, a master planned force main is to be constnicted along King's
Highway from Kings Baptist Church north to 49th Street, to which the subject force math will connect. In
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
DI : 0
5 L I
-22-
•
conjunction with the development of Emerald Estates, the Utilities Depaitttient has required that approxunately
2,224 lineal feet of 6" force main be extended from King's Highway west along 45th Street's right-of-way, to the
subject subdivision.
Attached is a proposed developer's agreement with DEMETREE — INDIAN RIVER LLC for reimbursement of
a portion of the subject force main. The Developer's Agreement is stipulated to reimburse the Developer for the
County's share of the force main based on itemized invoices of installed materials on a percentage complete
basis -less 10% retainage, monthly with final payment and release of retainage at the time said facilities are
dedicated to the County (SC — 1.A of attached agreement).
As shown in Exhibit - 13 of the attached Agreement, the County Share and Developer's share for
installing the recommended improvements is tabulated below and included in the attached Developer's
Agreement. is as follows:
RFCOMMENDATIDN-
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Developer's agreement as presented & authorizes the Chairman to execute the same.
Commissioner Tippin announced that he will abstain from voting as he has an interest
in this property.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Tippin abstaining)
approved the Developer's Agreement with
Demetree-Indian River LLC and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended by
staff.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM FOR
COMMISSIONER TIPPIN IS ON FILE
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-23-
: r=
�
U-23-
R, fl
Descrt t� inn
Water
Distribution
System
Developer's Share
$7,330.36
County's Share
$52,864.16
Total
Protect Cost
$60,244.52
RFCOMMENDATIDN-
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Developer's agreement as presented & authorizes the Chairman to execute the same.
Commissioner Tippin announced that he will abstain from voting as he has an interest
in this property.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Tippin abstaining)
approved the Developer's Agreement with
Demetree-Indian River LLC and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended by
staff.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM FOR
COMMISSIONER TIPPIN IS ON FILE
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-23-
: r=
�
U-23-
R, fl
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2002-013
PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING, ABANDONMENT,
VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF A 6' WIDE
PORTION OF VIA MARBELLA BOULEVARD WITHIN
THE GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT AND
RESERVING THE ENTIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY AS A
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed an undated Memorandum:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
TMEI,T HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development irectoil
THROUGH• Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP
Senior Planner, Current Development
SUBJECT: Grand Harbor LTD Request for Abandonment of a 6 Foot Wide Strip of
Via Marbella Boulevard Right-of-way within Grand Harbor
It is requested that the data herein presented be given foiuial consideration by the Board
of County Commissioners at its regular date of February 5, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Grand Harbor, LTD has submitted a petition to abandon a 6' wide strip of a segment of
Via Marbella Boulevard located in the northern section of the Grand Harbor
Development. The subject right-of-way segment is presently developed with a roadway
and pedestrian path improvements. The applicant is proposing to abandon a narrow strip
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
of right-of-way which measures approximately 6' x 560' and is located along the
southeast side of a curved segment of Via Marbella Boulevard right-of-way. Because the
subject right-of-way segment is wider than required or necessary, it is a candidate for
narrowing through the requested partial abandonment.
The reason for the proposed request is to enable the developer of the Sunset Cove
Planned Development (PD) to meet its 25' PD perimeter setback requirement with a
proposed design The Sunset Cove PD was approved by the Board on May 15, 2001 and
provides for the constriction of 11 residential units. The approved Sunset Cove PD meets
the 25' perimeter setback without the requested abandonment; however, the applicant is
seeking the abandonment to provide greater flexibility and buildable area for two of the
PD lots.
ANALYSIS:
The subject segment of Via Marbella Boulevard was created as a private local road by the
River Club plat, which was approved in March of 1988. Through the county's right-of-
way abandonment process, staff has coordinated with utility providers (who have rights
within the platted right-of-way area) and has reviewed the request to ensure that
applicable county development standards are satisfied. The subject right-of-way was
platted at 72' wide, which is wider than the required 60' local road right-of-way width.
The proposed abandonment of the 6' wide strip would reduce the right-of-way width to
66' which still exceeds the 60' local road minimum. Therefore, approving the request
will not reduce the Via Marbella Boulevard right-of-way width below the minimum
required width of 60'.
Currently, there are improvements located within the subject 6' wide strip of right-of-
way. These improvements include a portion of an 8' wide private cart path/pedestrian
path along with underground utilities including telephone hnes. To ensure continued use
of the utility improvements and the county's ability (without obligation) to perform
drainage maintenance within the right-of-way, staff is recommending that, as a condition
of abandonment, the entire 6' wide strip be retained as a drainage and utility easement.
Because the pedestrian improvements will remain private, under the control of the Grand
Harbor Property Owners Association, no public pedestrian easement is needed or
proposed. The proposed resolution expressly reserves the area as a drainage and utility
easement to ensure legal rights for necessary infrastructure improvements.
Per guidelines established by the Board of County Commissioners, this petition was
reviewed by all county divisions and utility providers having jurisdiction or potential
interests within the right-of-way. All reviewing agencies and departments have
recommended approval of the requested abandonment, with the condition that the entire
6' wide right-of-way area be reserved as a public drainage and utility easement. The
subject right-of-way is not part of the roadway system as noted on the County
Thoroughfare Plan, and is not needed for the thoroughfare system. Furthermore, the
abandonment would not affect the nght of convenient access to surrounding properties.
Also, the County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the attached abandonment
resolution for legal foam and sufficiency.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
abandon its rights to the subject 6' wide strip of right-of-way and authorize the chairman
to execute the attached abandonment resolution, with the following condition:
That the entire 6' wide strip of subject right-of-way be retained as a drainage and
utility easement.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Planning Director Stan Boling explained that this is a private road with an oversized
72 -foot right-of-way. The standard right-of-way is 68 feet. The County will retain a 6 -foot
drainage and utility easement.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 2002-013
providing for the closing, abandonment, vacation
and discontinuance of a 6' wide portion of Via
Marbella Boulevard within the Grand Harbor
Development and reserving the entire right-of-way
as a drainage and utility easement.
RESOLUTION 2002-013
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING,
ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF A 6' WIDE
PORTION OF VIA MARBELLA BOULEVARD WITHIN THE GRAND
HARBOR DEVELOPMENT AND RESERVING THE ENTIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY
AS A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, SAIDA LAND LYING IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2001, Indian River County received a duly executed and
documented petition from GHA Grand Harbor, Ltd. of Florida, requesting that the County close,
vacate, abandon, discontinue renounce and disclaim any right, title and interest of the County and
the public in and to a portion 6' wide section of Via Marbella Boulevard as shown on the plat of the
River Club subdivision, and recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 64-64E of the public records of Indian
River County Florida , said lands lying to Indian River County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes 336.10, notice of a public hearing to
consider said petition was duly published; and
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting documents, staff investigation and
report, and testimony of all those interested and present, the board finds that the subject right-of-way
is not a state or federal highway, nor located within any municipality, nor is said right-of-way
necessary for continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, nor access to any given
private property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA that
1. All right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to that certain right-of-way
being known more particularly as.
A parcel of land lying in Section 14, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, Indian
River County, Florida, being more fully described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 14, Township 32 South, Range
39 East; thence N53°48'21"W, a distance of 1,077.85 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING; thence N80°03'51 "W, a distance of 6.00 feet to a point of non tangent
curve, thence along said curve to the right, which bears S80°03'51"E having a delta
of 38°32'44" a radius of 620.00 feet an arc length of 417.10 feet to a point of
compound curve thence along a curve to the right having a delta of 30°15'29" a
radius of 270.00 feet an arc length of 142.59 feet; thence S 11°15'38"E a distance of
6.00 feet to a point of non tangent curve; thence along a curve to the left, which
radius bears S 11°15'38"E having a delta of 30°15'29" a radius of 264 00 feet an arc
length of 139.42 feet to a point of compound curve; thence along a curve to the left
having a delta of 38°32'44 ' a radius of 614.00 feet an arc length of 413.07 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 3,336.53 square feet or 0.08 acres, more or less. Subject to all easements,
restrictions and reservations of record.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
is hereby forever closed, abandoned, vacated, except that a drainage and utility easement is
expressly reserved over the entire right-of-way. (see Exhibit "A", attached)
2. The closing, vacation, abandonment, of this public right-of-way is in the best interests of the
public.
Notice of the adopting of this resolution shall be forthwith published once within thirty (30)
days from the date of adoption hereof; and
The Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution together with the proofs of publication
required by Florida Statutes 336.10 in the Official Record BocUs of Indian River County
without undue delay.
The right-of-way shall revert to the adjacent property.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman
Vice -Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Ruth Stanbridge
John W. Tippin
Fran Adams
Caroline D. Ginn
Kenneth R. Macht
Adams who moved
G) nn , and upon being
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 19th day of
February , 2002.
ATTEST: Jeffrey K Barton
County of Indian River
Deputy Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: P1. ,d
Ruth Stanbridge, Chdirman
Board of County Commissioners
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State and
County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Ruth M. Stanbri dqe , and
PATRICIA 'PJ" JONESs Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy Clerk,
respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument
and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 19th day of
February , A.D , 2002
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
GteA
William G. Collins,
Deputy County Attorney
Kimberly E Massung
MY COMMISSION # CC855436 EXPIRES
July 15, 2003
BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE. INC
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
BY: /
Robert M. Keating, C', Di r • ctor
Community Development Di ision
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
SKETCH OF
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT
A -3075'29»
ALONG VIA MARBELLA BOULEVARD R=270.00'
L-142.59'
NOTE:
THE PORTION OF RIGHT—OF—WAY BEING
DESCRIBED HEREIN IS TO BE UTILIZED
AS AN UTILITY EASEMENT.
PROPOSED
SUNSET COVE SUB.
5 -
GRAPHIC SCALE
BEGINNING
POINT OF
COMMENCEMENT
491412.dwg cd #29
SKETCH OF EASEMENT DESCRIPTON
PREPARED BY:
MASTELLER, MOLER Sc REED, INC
2205 14TH AVENUE
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
PHONE: (561) 564-8050
FAX: (561) 794-0647
SHEET 1 OF 2
ROD REED, PSM 3916
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
SKETCH OF
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT
ALONG VIA MARBELLA BOULEVARD
NOTE:
THE PORTION OF RIGHT—CF—WAY BEING
DESCRIBED HEREIN IS TO BE UTILIZED
AS AN UTILITY EASEMENT.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A parcel of land lying in Section 14, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida,
being more fully described os follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 14, Township 32 South, Range 39 East; thence
N53'48'21"W, a distance of 1,077.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N801)3'51"W, o distance of
6.00 feet to a point of non tongent curve; thence along said curve to the right, which radius bears
580'03151"E having o delta of 38'32'44" a rodius of 620.00 feet on orc length of 417.10 feet to a point
of compound curve; thence along o curve to the right having a delta of 3015'29" a radius of 270.00
feet an orc length of 142.59 feet ; thence S1115'38"E, a distance of 6.00 feet to a point of non
tangent curve; thence along o curve to the left, which radius bears S111538"E having a delta of
3015'29" a radius of 264.00 feet on orc length of 139.42 feet to a point of compound curve; thence
along a curve to the left having a delta of 38'32'44" a rodius of 614.00 feet an arc length of 413.07
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 3,336.53 square feet or 0.08 acres, more or less. Subject to all easements, restrictions and
reservations of record.
SKETCH OF EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY:
MASTELLER, MOLER & REED, INC.
2205 14TH AVENUE
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
PHONE: (561) 564-8050
FAX: (561) 794-0647
SHEET 2 OF 2 ROD REED, PSM 3916
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - CHANNING CORPORATION
(KENNEDY GROVES, INC.) OLD ORCHID PD PROJECT
- REQUEST TO MODIFY CERTAIN APPROVED
CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN SETBACKS (FRONT YARD
SETBACKS ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROJECT)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 11, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Aalif 4 �, 9
Robert M. ating, MCP
Community Development Direct
,.d. 4'
THRU: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP WVW1
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: February 11, 2002
SUBJECT: Channing Corporation's Request to Modify Certain Approved Conceptual PD
Plan Setbacks for a Portion of the Old Orchid PD Project
It is requested that the data herein presented be given fouual consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of Febniary 19, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Knight, McGuire and Associates, Inc. has submitted an application on behalf of Channing, Inc.
to modify the approved conceptual PD plan setbacks for a portion of the Old Orchid PD project.
The development is located at the northeast corner of Jungle Trail and C.R. 510.
At its regular meeting of May 5`h, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners granted conceptual
PD plan approval for Old Orchid. That plan approved 136 residential units on 37.84 acres
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
resulting in a density of 3.59 units per acre. Subsequently, portions of the project were
constructed, platted, and many homes have been built. The subject modification request involves
a reduction in certain internal setbacks only. No increase in the number of lots or density is
proposed, and no changes to any approved project parameters, layout, or conditions are proposed
with the exception of these certain setbacks. For reference purposes, the May 5th, 1998 staff
report for the Old Orchid project is attached (attachment #3). That report accurately represents
all aspects of the approved project.
As approved, the PD plan requires 20' front yard setbacks for Lots along the project site's east
perimeter (see attachment #3). The applicant is now requesting that the required front yard
setbacks for lots along the east penmeter be reduced from 20' to 10'. Those setbacks are internal
only, and apply to yards that front internal streets. Pursuant to PD ordinance section 915.26, a
setback, which was approved as part of a conceptual PD plan may be reduced only through
approval of a modified conceptual plan. Since this type of conceptual PD plan modification
requires special exception approval through the public hearing process, this request requires
special exception approval.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMNIISSION ACTION:
At its regular meeting of October 25, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of the modified conceptual plan.
ANALYSIS:
To change the project's approved setbacks, the applicant must modify the currently approved
conceptual PD plan. Because no design changes are involved in the request, no project design
plan revisions are needed. Consequently, the project s existing preliminary PD plan and land
development penult will remain in force, unchanged. Thus, only the conceptual PD plan
requires modification.
The following table compares parameters of the RS -6 district, the approved PD plan, and the
proposed PD plan setback change (which is indicated by shading):
APPROVED PD DISTRICT
RS -6 DISTRICT
Same as RS -6, with guest cottage allowed
as permitted, by 97L41(4)
Single family detached, accessory
dwelling units, places of worship, etc.
as listed in section 911.07.
Density
3.60 units/acre (net)
up to 6 units/acre
Maximum bldg. coverage
Maximum impervious per lot
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Minimum open space:
Per lot
Overall site
20%'
40%
40%
40%
Maximum bldg. height
35'
35'
Minimum lot size
Internal lots 5,700 sq. ft.;
7,000 sq. ft.
East perimeter 7,920 sq ft.;
West perimeter 7,000 sq. ft.
Building setbacks:
Front:
!' 10'
along east perimeter
20'
10' (all other lots)
Side:
10' along east perimeter
10'
8' (all other lots)t
Rear:
25'-30' on all perimeters,
10' internal lots
20'
Pools:
Front:
24- 10' (east perimeter)
5' (all other lots)
20'
Side:
10' (east penmeter)
2' (all other lots)
10'
Rear:
7' (internal)
10'
10' (north, east, south perimeters)
25'-30' (Jungle Trail/west
perimeter)2
Decks & Patios:
Front:
!'
(east perimeter)
20'
5' (all other lots)
Side:
10' (east penmeter)
10'
2' (all other lots)
Rear:
7' (internal)
10'
10' (north, east, south perimeters)
25'-30' (Jungle Trail/west
perimeter)
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
'The side yard setback will range from 0' to 8', with all buildings being separated by a minimum of 8', except along east
perimeter where RS -6 setbacks apply
'No building, pool, patio or deck can be located within the 30' Jungle Trail Buffer or within 25' of the west perimeter;
whichever distance is greater.
'Open space will be guaranteed through the setbacks on each individual lot and the overall controls on the conceptual PD
plan.
General Note: Roof overhangs can encroach in privately dedicated easements, no other structures shall be allowed to
encroach in easements of any type.
General Note: For lots with more than one front yard; a 6' fence can be placed in one of the front yards to provide privacy for rear
yard amenities.
General Note: Roof overhangs are allowed to encroach 3' onto the adjacent property.
General Note: The developer is requesting a 40' wide private right of way for the local road within the development. In
addition to the 40' wide right of way, there will be an 8' utility easement on both sides of the right of way to form a 56'
wide roadway and utility corridor.
The approved conceptual PD plan requires a 10' wide Type "C" buffer along the project's east
property line adjacent to Oceanaire Heights and Spring Place subdivisions. All of the lots along
the east perimeter meet the RS -6 size and dimensional criteria (70' width, 7000 sq. ft.), which
provides a measure of compatibility for the lot owners in Oceanaire Heights and Spring Place.
Presently, the setbacks for the Old Orchid lots along the east perimeter are 20' front yard, 10'
side yards, and 25' rear yard with pools allowed to be within 10' of the rear property line These
setbacks are generally consistent with the RS -6 zoning district, except that the rear yard is
actually increased from 20' to 25'. From a compatibility viewpoint, the Old Orchid east
perimeter lot sizes are consistent with the zoning of the adjacent property; the side yard setbacks
are the same as the adjacent property; there is a greater rear yard setback (20' vs. 25'), and a
Type "C" buffer is provided pursuant to the compatibility matrix in section 915.16. Therefore,
staff believes the request is compatible with the adjacent single family homes to the east.
The applicant's request is that the intemal front yard setback be reduced from 20' to 10' for the
lots along the east perimeter. This change in the building envelope configuration is needed to
accommodate longer homes that the developer has built elsewhere in the development and
wishes to build on the east perimeter Lots.
Staff has no objection to the internal front yard setback being reduced from 20' to 10', as
requested. Since the front yards are internal to the development, the difference in the setbacks
would not impact properties adjacent to Old Orchid. The change would make the front yard
setbacks for the east perimeter lots consistent with the front yard setback for all other lots within
Old Orchid. Such consistency is desirable for the developer and will not adversely impact
adjacent properties.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-34-
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approval
to modify the front yard setback for the lots along the east perimeter, as requested.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. BCC Staff Report of 5/05/98
4. Conceptual plan with lot study
5. Approved P&ZC Minutes
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the memorandum and noted that no external
setbacks or buffers will be changed, only the internal setbacks.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ginn expressed her dislike of what is happening in the County with
PDs and stated she could not support this action.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board,
by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Ginn opposed)
approved the modification of the front yard setback
from 20' to 10' for the lots along the east perimeter,
as requested, as recommended by staff.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - MARK GROSSMAN -
VERO LAKE ESTATES PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC. RE: VERO LAKE ESTATES
DRAINAGE PROJECT
The Board reviewed a letter of February 12, 2002:
Vero Lake Estates Property Owners Assoc. Inc.
Mark Grossman, President
9960 86th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967
561-589-6043 — markgrossman9960(@,,yahoo.com
February 12, 2002
Mr. James Chandler
Indian River County Administrator
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Mr. Chandler:
I am requesting an opportunity to address the Indian River County Commission at
its meeting February 19, 2002.
I will speak as an individual homeowner in the Vero Lake Estates subdivision and
I may speak officially as the President of the Vero Lake Estates Property Owners Assoc.
if I am empowered to do so by a vote of the VLEPOA general membership February 18,
2002.
My topic will be homeowners concerns regarding the VT E Drainage Project
being carried out by the Indian River County Department of Public Works, its funding
and the projects negative impact on the neighborhood.
Documents I will reference include:
1. The Vero Lake Estates MSTU Ordinance, November 21, 1984
2. Minutes of Indian River County Commission meeting, November 21, 1984
3. Vero Lake Estates Preliminary Drainage Study, 1988, revised 1990
4. Vero Lake Estates Master Drainage Pian, 1992
5. Application for Florida Dept of Environmental Protection 319(H) Nonpoint
Source Management Program Grant, July 6, 1999
6. Vero Lake Estates Drainage Project budget documents
7. Vero Lake Estates MSTU account documents
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Mark Grossman, 9960 86`h Street, speaking as an individual homeowner and as
President of the Vero Lake Estates Property Owners Association, expressed concerns
regarding the Vero Lake Estates MSTU and drainage project. He gave a brief history of the
MSTU, the drainage project and the MSTU Advisory Committee. He asked the Board to
consider reactivating the Advisory Committee and felt that much of the residents' surprise
and alarm at the scope of the project could have been avoided had the Advisory Committee
still been in place. He also mentioned the County's responsibility for keeping the canals
ditches cleaned.
Mr Grossman continued that his home and several others face on 86th Street which
will now be a canal. This will have an extreme impact on the value and desirability of these
homes. He was not sure what could be done but hoped there is a possibility that this canal
could be moved to 85th Street which does not have any homes fronting it.
Mr. Grossman then expressed concerns about the funding responsibilities of the
MSTU which he believed is now about $250,000 on top of the $50,000 to $60,000 already
spent.
Public Works Director Jim Davis presented the following POWERPOINTTM
presentation:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002', ;.'
VERO LAKE
ESTATES.
THROUGHOLQ
PROJECT AfEA
RCP Ads Ott cet
east/west meed
SENT OLE HO
Map G
Proposed Drainage System
Belndort and Associates
€11r, r or.....r..r A.—low
Introduction
On August 23, 1982, The Indian
River County Public Works Dept.
recommended establishment of an
MSTU for drainage and road
improvements fo Vero Lakes
Estates Subdivision -54 residents
attended initial meeting
Nov. 8, 1982 -James Davis, IRC
PW Director recommended to
VLEPOA President Charles Seifert
establishing a Drainage and road
committee
2119/2002
MSTU established 1984
MSTU Advisory Committee members
participated in selecting Engineering
Consultant for Drainage Study in 1986
July 29, 1987 -Public Notice advertised in
VBPJ inviting all property owners to submit
letters of interest to be. appointed to MSTU
Advisory Committee
August 18, 1988 -Preliminary Drainage Study
reviewed by MSTU Committee --Report
included new canals needed along 80th St.
and 86th St. west of 95th Ave. Nov. 16, 1988
VLE News stated "additional and larger
2,19ao0canals will be dug. BCC approved study
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
fi
•
AA -
Sept 1990.
Final Study showing plan and cross-section
views of canals approved 1993
Grant Funding of $685,000 received 2001
Meetings of VLEPOA held 8/13/01, 9/17/01,
and 11/19/01 attended by Public Works
Director James Davis to show plans of
project, give overview, and ask questions.
Project bids received in December, 2001
Jan. 17 and 29, 2002- meetings held with
property owners during construction
2/19/2002
•
MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN
ENGINEERING REPORT
FOR
VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION
Prepared for
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
and
The Vero Lake Estates Area Municipal
Service Taxing Unit Advisory Committee
Prepared by
KimleyHorn and Associates, Inc.
Vero Beach, Florida
November 1992
2/19/2002
5
Director Davis explained that he had attended numerous meetings to explain the
project. The $60,000 annual income from the MSTU was used for road paving and the 86'
Street and 80" Street canals were identified as being needed as far back as 1988. The
groundwater table in Vero Lake Estates is very high. There are some actions which could
be taken to alleviate the impact of the canals, such as extending some culverts which would
add about $75 per foot to construction costs. The driveways into the north -south streets can
also be culverted. He met with the property owners on January 29" in an effort to find ways
to reduce the impact but it would be very difficult to move the canal to 85" Street as this
would change the hydraulics of the whole system. Vero Lake Estates has grown rapidly
since the master planning began in the 1980s and the subdivision now has 800 to 900
homes. The County does the best it can to maintain the ditches but it is very difficult to
maintain some of the older ditches because of their vertical slopes. The new ditches are
being designed so that they will be much easier to maintain. Most of the MSTU revenue has
been spent on road paving and very little has been devoted to the stormwater management.
Education of the residents will be undertaken by the County Extension Agent who is
currently organizing that and will announce meetings very shortly.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-39-
AAAX
Commissioner Adams believed the real gist of the problem has been the incredible
growth in Vero Lake Estates and the fact that the stormwater management has been a very
slow growing project. She suggested that perhaps flyers on residents' doors could help and
asked Director Davis to investigate other actions that could be taken.
Chairman Stanbridge offered to work with Director Davis and the homeowners and
noted that we would have had water in the homes in that area without grant funding for the
stormwater improvements.
Director Davis noted that many homeowners have left the area but the Advisory
Committee did meet 3 or 4 times a year to develop the master plan and copies were given
to everyone who was interested. He does always make himself available to residents who
have concerns.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
Chairman Stanbridge called for a break at 10:18 a.m. and the meeting reconvened at
10:22 a.m. with the same persons present.
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - CHRIS KIRRIE - RE:
ACCESS TO SEMBLER PROPERTY
The Board reviewed a letter of February 15, 2002:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
BR
-40-
cess r0 p
: y Ute'. Ali offers, presentations and proposals, prior to this date are no
longer available and are not to be considered.
KirriL' Owns the 60' strip between .lots 20 & 29 ((#1)M3) and has had it
surveyed This is not a part of either lot 20 or 29, but is a Gap in Plat! This
strip runs between the 130th Street ROW and the Sernbler tract, and is
presently Kirrie's second access to the Sernbler tract.
It is approximately 1380' south of the gate on 130th St. ROkk'. she new
access, based upon Board of County Commissioners motion of January 29,
2002, is 870' or less from the gate on 130`h St. ROPV, thus reducing the
distance to be traveled into the :ANCA..
Implement the trade cts follows: C.N. Kirrie will trade 1 acre from the
southerly end of the Sernbler Tract03) M), Lots 27 & 28, AA Berry
Subdivision in the Fleming Grant, for a strip ofland((2)M3) 60' wide to
access the Sernbler Tract Lots 16, 27 & 28 of the AA_ Bern' Subdivision in
the Fleming Grant. The 60' strip will abut the 130'1' Street (Gibson Street)
right-of-way and cross Lot 20 oldie AA Berry Subdivision at the most
practical and least intrusive location on the Northerly end of said Lot 20, to
contact Lot 28 of the Sernbler Tract.
It is suggested that the trade to Indian River Country', be taken as cc strip from
the southerly ends of Lots 27 & 28 ((3)M3), in that the land is already clear
and would provide the cleared buffer strip required by the Management
Plan for the North Sebastian Conservation Ared(1\ S.0 .A.) 1/29/98, page 6.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Trade approximately ;% acre((#3)M3), for % acre ((#2)M3'. Kirrie will quit
claim ((41413) to Indian River County for the purpose of mitigation as
needed. See Attachment ((113)113)
Kirrie will provide engineering and will construct 130`x' Street to the new
access at ((#2)*13).
Indian River County will: In conjunction with the City of Sebastian, process
the modification of the HCP and ITP plans and permits. Re: letter of Aug.
24, 2000 City of Sebastian indicates the need for modifications to the ITP, cc
Mike Jennings, Roland Deblois, Ruth Stanbridge, Fran Adams, due to
outparcels in conserve area and airport issues.
The construction of the road, on the approximately 870' of 130th Street
right -of -wary, will be done by Mr. Kirrie, modification of the I.T.P./H C. P.
will be a joint effort between Indian River County and the City of Sebastian.
Any private entities or groups (other than recognized conservation groups)
using the Kirrie constructed portion of 130th Street, shall reimburse Mr.
Kirrie through the county on a fair share based on the final cost of
construction.
lr. Kirrie will fence that portion of 130th Street and the new access ((2)M3)
from the gate south at such a time as the rest of the IVSCA is fenced
Mr. Kirrie will connect to sewer & water at the time it comes to the 129th
Street boundary of the Sembler tract.
Mr. Kirrie will contribute $2,500.00 to help offset the costs ofITP/HCP
permit modifications. The City of Sebastian and Indian River County, I
believe, are going to have to amend the above mentioned permits, due to
FAA restrictions, Re: ITP/HCP at the Sebastian airport. Since the above
dation will be ongoing, the minor portion (130th Street access) of the
modification can be incorporated at a cost, less than that of a separate
action.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
c
i
-42-
Chairman Stanbridge asked Mr. Kirrie to please be brief and questioned whether Mr
Kirrie has brought a new proposal to the Board.
C. N. Kirrie responded that this is a new proposal, and Chairman Stanbridge
acknowledged that this will negate the old proposal which Mr. Kirrie submitted several
weeks ago.
Mr. Kirrie stated that staff has not come forward with any solutions in a year and a
half, and Chairman Stanbridge emphasized that the other proposal had only been submitted
2 weeks ago.
Mr. Kirrie acknowledged that his approach is the proposal presented today which
proposes to make 130th Street his second access. He stated that a motion to accept 129'
Street as his primary access would relieve the County of any impacts on the North Sebastian
Conservation Area (N SCA) and acknowledged that no action taken by the Board would
make everyone happy.
Chairman Stanbridge acknowledged that this is a new proposal which contains
language stating that: "all offers, presentations or proposals prior to this date are no longer
available and are not to be considered". She noted that the Board will now submit this new
proposal to staff for their review and thanked Mr Kirrie.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-44-
11.A. CHESTNUT CONTRACTORS TRADES FACILITY SITE
PLAN - KEN CHESTNUT (ATTORNEY BRUCE
BARKETT) - APPEAL OF ROAD PAVING CONDITION
12TH AVENUE SW AND 8TH STREET SW
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 12, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
TMEINT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
obert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Iirecto r
FROM: Stan Boling AICP
Planning Director
DATE: February 12, 2002
SUBJECT: Bruce Barkett's Appeal of a Road Paving Condition of the Chesnut
Contractors Trades Facility Site Plan (SP -MA -01-11-78)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of Febniary 19, 2002.
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Ken Chesnut, through his agent Randy Mosby, P.E., applied for and obtained conditional
major site plan approval to construct a 3,500 square foot contractors trades facility on a 0.35 acre
site located at the southeast comer of 12th Avenue S.W. and 8th Street S.W. While neither 8`h
Street S.W. nor 12th Avenue S.W. are paved, the site plan proposes access to the site via 12th
Avenue S.W.
Throughout the review and approval process, staff applied the road paving/escrowing
requirements of LDR section 952.09(5) and coordinated with the county attomey's office
regarding which requirements can be applied. The section 952.09(5) requirements call for Mr.
Chesnut to escrow his fairshare for the future paving of 8`h Street S.W. and require that 12th
Avenue S.W. be paved from Oslo Road (the nearest paved road) to Chesnut's proposed project
driveway prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy (C.O.) for the project.
Under the LDRs, Mr. Chesnut has several options for having 12th Avenue S W paved. Among
these options is having the road paved through the county's paving assessment process, a process
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
which Mr. Chesnut has already initiated. On December 4, 2001, the Board of County
Commissioners authorized Public Works to perform surveying, design, and cost -estimating
work, and schedule an assessment hearing. The hearing has not yet been scheduled.
During staffs review of the subject major site plan application, it was the opinion of the county
attorney's office that the county could not properly require Mr. Chesnut to escrow for the future
paving of 8th Street S.W. since he does not propose to access that street. It was, however,
determined that the paving requirement could be applied to 12th Avenue S.W. since the project
will access from that road. Subsequently, staff granted major site plan approval with a condition
that prior to issuance of a C.O. for the project, 12th Avenue S.W. must be paved from Oslo Road
to the project's proposed 12th Avenue S.W. driveways.
Attorney Bruce Barkett, on behalf of Mr. Chesnut, has now filed an appeal of the site plan
condition that 12th Avenue S.W. be paved prior to issuance of a C.O. for the subject project.
Instead of the paving condition, Attorney Barkett proposes that Mr. Chesnut escrow his fairshare
for the future paving of 12th Avenue S.W. without any road paving being required prior to
project C.O. The Board is now to consider Attorney Barkett's appeal.
ANALYSIS:
• Basis for the Appeal
Attorney Barkett asserts that the requirement of LDR section 952.09(5)(c)5, as applied to the
Chesnut project, is unconstitutional in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of
Dolan v. City of Tigard. Staff and Attorney Barkett agree that the subject appeal is a matter for
the Board to decide. -
• Current Road Paving/Escrowing Standards
LDR section 952.09 sets forth requirements for paving and escrowing for the future paving of
roads that access and abut development projects. Such requirements are important, especially in
the unincorporated area of the county where unpaved roads are still fairly common in areas
where new developments are allowed and proposed. These requirements do not apply to single-
family homes or minor site plan projects, but do apply to subdivisions, planned developments
(PDs), and major site plan projects like Mr. Chesnut's.
Under section 952.09(5), proposed projects are classified either as "small traffic
attractors/generators" (less than 100 average daily trips) or "large traffic attractors/generators"
(100 or more average during trips). For "large traffic" projects, the current standards require that
the road accessing the project "...be paved from the project's access point(s) to a paved public
road". Those standards also require that developers of large traffic projects escrov. their
fairshare for the future paving of abutting unpaved roads that are not proposed for direct access.
The standards for "small traffic" projects are not as stringent. Those standards generally require
only fairshare escrowing for access and abutting unpaved roads. There is, however, one
"cumulative effect" provision, which applies to small traffic projects that access an unpaved road
that currently exceeds 200 daily trips or will exceed 200 daily trips with the addition of the
project's traffic. Where such conditions exist, the developer of the small traffic project is
required to pave the access road or have the access road paved prior to issuance of a C.O. for the
project. This cumulative effect provision is found in LDR section 952.09(5)(c)5 and is the
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-46-
•
subject of Attorney Barkett's appeal.
The road paving and escrowing requirements have two essential objectives: to ensure that
projects with larger traffic attraction/generation characteristics have paved access and to ensure
that fairshare contributions are made for the eventual paving of roads in areas where
development is allowed but roadways are currently sub -standard. These standards have been in
effect since the mid -1980's and have not been revisited since 1990. As structured, these
regulations appear to be constitutional. Mr. Barkett's appeal, however, alleges that these
regulations are unconstitutional "as applied"
• Appeal Issues
Since 1990, court decisions have changed the way that certain types of regulatory "exactions"
can be applied to development approvals. The previously cited Dolan v. City of Tigard 1994
U.S. Supreme Court case is one such case, and the application of that decision is still being
played out across the country. That court decision requires that governmental exactions applied
to a project be "roughly proportional" to the project's impacts. In this case, the "roughly
proportional" issue will be adequately addressed if the assessment project is approved; however,
there is no guarantee of assessment project approval. Also, there is a timing problem since Mr.
Chesnut cannot control the Length of time involved in completing the assessment process and
paving.
In analyzing the Barkett appeal, staff considered several issues. First, there is an issue as to
whether a paving condition constitutes an exaction subject to the rough proportionality rule.
Second, there is an issue of what items of proportionality must be considered if it is deteinrined
that the Dolan test applies.
Regarding the first issue, there is no Florida caselaw that resolves that question. Generally,
exactions have been defined as required land dedications or other property takings, but not off-
site development requirements. While Oregon courts have determined that off-site
improvements required as a condition of development approval constitute exactions and are
subject to the Dolan test, no Florida case has resolved that issue. For purposes of this analysis,
the assumption can be made that the paving requirement does constitute an exaction and is
subject to the Dolan test.
Application of the Dolan test in this case involves deteiiiiining whether the exaction (cost of the
paving) is roughly proportional to the project s impacts. Those impacts could be measured by
vehicle trips attracted to the site or front footage of the property. The proportionality
measurement would then be the percentage of the improvement cost that would be incurred by
the developer to meet the condition compared to the percentage of the development's impact on
the roadway which is the subject of the condition.
With Chesnut, the worst case manner in which the condition could be met would be by Chesnut
paving 12`h Avenue S.W. at his expense from Oslo Road to his access point (Alternatively,
Chesnut could get the road paved through an assessment project, either forced or voluntary, or
through a non -assessment paving project undertaken with other property owners on 12`h Avenue
S.W. These alternatives would result in Chesnut paying his proportionate share or less for the
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-47-
1
66
•
paving.)
If Chesnut paved the road as an assessment project with the county paying 25% of the cost (as it
does on all assessment projects) but with no other property owners being assessed, Chesnut
would pay 75% of the improvement cost but represent only 16% of the front footage impact
(180' of frontage on 1,100' of paving project frontage). With an approved assessment project,
Chesnut will pay only 12% of the cost although he has 16% of the impact on a frontage basis
Therefore, although Mr Chesnut may eventually pay only 12% of the project cost for 16% of the
project frontage, he might also eventually pay 75%-100% if the assessment project is not
approved and the County decides not to share in the costs.
Because the site plan approval condition based upon 952.09(5)(c)5 as applied to the Chesnut
project does not meet the "rough proportionality' test, it should be considered unconstitutional as
applied. To make the site plan approval action constitutional the Board should delete the road
paving condition and replace it with the condition proposed by Attomey Barkett. That condition
is as follows: "Prior to issuance of a C.O., the applicant shall pay his fairshare for the paving of
12`h Street S.W.". Such a condition satisfies the "roughly proportional test" and eliminates
potential timing problems.
In addition, the Board should suspend application of LDR section 952.09(5)(c)5 and direct staff
to initiate an LDR amendment to bring LDR section 952.09 into confoiniance with current case
law.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Delete the site plan approval LDR section 952.09(5)(c)5 road paving condition applied to
the Chesnut site plan
2. Attach the following replacement approval condition to the Chesnut site plan project:
"Prior to issuance of a C.O. for the project the developer shall pay his fairshare for the
paving of 12th Avenue S.W."
3. Direct staff and the Attorney's Office to initiate amendments to the road paving and
escrowing requirements of LDR section 952.09 to bring such regulations into
conformance with current case law.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Chesnut Location Map and Site Plan
2. Approval Conditions
3. Barkett Request
4. LDR Section 952.09
5. Paving Assessment Agenda Item
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the memorandum and explained that, as the
LDRs now read, paving costs assessed to Mr. Chestnut would not be proportional to the
impact of this project.
Bruce Barkett, Attorney for owner, noted that case law says that when an application
is submitted, conditions have to relate to the impact of the project. The current ordinance
would require Mr. Chestnut to pave all the way from his project down 12' Avenue to Oslo
Road.
Director Boling stated that the reasoning behind the requirement is good but case law
states that the cost to the develop must bear a relationship to his particular project. In this
instance, Mr Chestnut's project will not have an impact equal to the requirement to pave all
of 12th Avenue to Oslo Road.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously deleted the site plan approval LDR
Section 952.09(5)(c)5 road paving condition applied
to the Chestnut site plan; attached the following
replacement approval condition to the Chestnut site
plan project: "Prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the project, the developer shall pay
his fairshare for the paving of 12`" Avenue SW"; and
directed staff and the County Attorney's Office to
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-50-
r
initiate amendments to the road paving and
escrowing requirements of LDR Section 952.09 to
bring such regulations into conformance with
current case law; all as recommended by staff.
11.B. EMR TECHNOLOGIES D/B/A REPLAY SYSTEMS, INC.
SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR E911 PUBLIC SAFETY
ANSWERING POINT (PSAP) RACAL WORDNET
LOGGING RECORDERS - SOLE SOURCE BASIS -
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF AND CITY OF VERO
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 7, 2002:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: John King, Director
Department of Emer
DATE: February 7, 2002
.4
y ervices
SUBJECT: Approval of Service Agreements for E911 Public Safety Answering Point
(PSAP) Logging Recorders on a Sole Source Basis from Replay Systems
Inc.
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February
19, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
•
In February 2001, the Board approved the purchase of a Racal Wordnet logging
recorder from 911 Surcharge Funds to replace the unreliable logging recorder in the
Vero Beach Police Department (VBPD) E-911 Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP).
The logging recorder is used to record all incoming and outgoing telephone calls, and it
also records the radio transmissions of the public safety officers The manufacturer's
one-year warranty is expiring and EMR Technologies d/b/a Replay Systems is the Sole
Source service provider for Racal equipment in Florida.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
bowl
70
-51-
The Indian River County Sheriff's Office (IRCSO) PSAP also utilizes a Racal Wordnet
logging recorder and this annual service ragreement tis theso Sddueffs for renewOfficalrecords addition
to the telephone lines, the logging one-
aw
year
Fire Department, and EMS radio transmissions. Staff is requesting
year service agreements with Replay Systems for each PSAP's logging recorder.
The VBPD has a Racal Wordnet Series II twenty-four (24) channel logging, and the cost
e
fof or annual)channelce loggng recordreement is e3,414. r, and the cost of this has
annualCAL serv\icerdnet P2 agreementty-
s
four (64) 99
$5,231.20.
No other vendors are qualified or certified to provide maintenance to this equipment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board approve the two (2)
$8,645.20. This was a planned expenditure and
Communications Center Account for this budget y
ON MOTION by Commissioner
11.C.
service agreements at a total cost of
funds were budgeted in the 120-133
ear.
Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously approved the Service Agreements on
a sole source basis with EMR Technologies d/b/a
Replay Systems, Inc. forE911 PSAP Racal Wordnet
Logging Recorders at a total cost of $8,645.20 for
the Indian River County Sheriffs Department and
the City of Vero Beach Police Department; as
recommended by staff.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
MAIN LIBRARY RENOVATIONS - BILL BRYANT &
ASSOCIATES - CHANGE ORDER #11
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 15, 2002:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
DX
nre
71
-52-
•
•
Date: February 15, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director tj
Subject: Emergency Approval for Change Order at Main Library
BACKGROUND:
This request for an emergency approval is due to time. Because the Board of County
Commissioners will not have a meeting on February 26, 2002, and due to the need to keep the
progress on the Main Library Expansion moving forward preventing any unnecessary delays on
part of the county, it is necessary to request that this item be added to the February 21, 2002
agenda.
The Board may recall that an approval for a change order for the architectural fiiw of Dow -
Howell -Gilmore -Associates, Inc was granted on January 15, 2002. That change order was for a
redesign of the restrooms at the Main Library. It was initially hoped that we could preserve the
existing restrooms without replacing them. That unfortunately has proved fruitless. The
restrooms need to be removed and as such rebuilt The redesign and reconstruction will result in
new facilities that will also be completely ADA compliant. The estimated cost on these
restrooms is $36,987. These are the figures submitted by Bill Bryant & Associates with review
of our architect. The architect will review the proposal and there may revisions. If any occur,
they will reduce the price of the proposal.
Staff is seeking the Board's approval of this proposal for reconstruction of the restrooms at a
price not to exceed $36,987. If approved and when submitted on a more formal change order
request, staff will submit the change for the Board's review and final approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Agree to add this item to the agenda of the February 19, 2002 agenda; authorize the contractor to
proceed with the reconstruction of the restrooms at a price not to exceed $36,987, and that the
staff be directed to bring the formal change order back to the Board after review by the
supervising architect along with any revised deductions .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously authorized the contractor to proceed
with the reconstruction of the restrooms at a price
not to exceed $36,987 and directed staff to bring the
formal change order back to the Board after review
by the supervising architect along with any revised
deductions, as recommended by staff.
CHANGE ORDER WILL BE BROUGHT
BACK TO THE BOARD FOR APPROVAL
•
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
PM
-53-
11.E. FUNDING POLICY FOR OUTSIDE AGENCIES (STATE,
NONPROFIT, CHILDREN'S SERVICES, QUASI -
NONPROFIT, AND TOURIST DEVELOPMENT)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 12, 2002:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
DATE: February 12, 2002
1
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Policy for Funding Outside Agencies
Description and Conditions
"Outside Agencies" are entities which perform a particular socioeconomic service for Indian River County
but are themselves not under the direct control of County government These agencies fall under the
categories of State, Nonprofit, Children's Services, Quasi -nonprofit, and Tourist Development.
During the FY 2001/2002 Budget Workshops on July 11-12, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners
charged this department with the responsibility of drafting a written policy for appropriating County funds to
outside agencies in some consistent and equitable manner. Attached is a comprehensive policy
developed by staff in accordance with this direction.
Discussion
The "Outside Agency Funding Policy" has two purposes:
A. To provide a set of defined procedures to outside agencies who wish to be considered for
funding in a particular budget year; as well as the agency's fiscal responsibilities upon approval
of such funding.
B. To provide an expedient decision making tool for the Commission and staff when considering
a particular agency's request for funding. In order to achieve fairness and consistency when
considering funding requests, this policy sets certain uniform financial and time parameters,
which can be referred to by the Board. Such parameters include:
1. A maximum allocation of funds to all nonprofit agencies within a particular fiscal year;
such allocation to be considered a 'ceiling' for the entire group.
2. Final date for application of funding in a particular budget year.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
alork
-54-
•
3. Amount and term of funding for individual nonprofit agencies:
a. Agencies to consider funding from the County as 'start-up assistance' only, not
a permanent source of revenue.
b. Agencies to be funded for a maximum of three four consecutive years, then
ineligible for three consecutive y ars county funding.
4. Agencies would be required to submit audited financial statements upon receipt of
$25,000 or more from the County, with a qualified opinion being sufficient grounds by
the Board to discontinue funding immediately upon receipt of such opinion.
5. Certain expenditures will not be reimbursed by the County.
6. Flonda Statutes, local ordinances, grant requirements and contractual agreements
would take precedence over funding parameters.
Staff Recommendation
County government serves at the will of the citizens of Indian River County and is responsible for using the
taxes collected for its operation wisely. Just as we have a set of strong accountability procedures in place
to support the funding of our County departments through these very taxes, so should we have a set of
strong procedures for handling funding requests from outside entities.
It is important that such requests be handled with special scrutiny since these entities are outside of direct
County control. With that in mind, this policy gives the Board a detailed, impartial, legal and financial
"checklist" by which to examine these entities' request at the outset, before any socio-economic
considerations. Further, agencies will understand that failure by them to adhere to the application and
reporting requirements outlined in this policy could result in potential denial of their request before it even
reaches the workshop stage (or, if already receiving funds from the County - potential cutoff of that
support).
For the reasons stated above, Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
attached policy for funding outside agencies.
Attachments
Outside Agency Funding Policy
Attachments A, B and C
Assistant County Administrator Joe Baird noted that last year, during the budget
process, the Commissioners expressed concern that we did not have a written policy
regarding funding of these agencies. Staff canvassed several counties as to their policies but
they do not fund these agencies at all. The biggest change proposed is to fund for a
maximum of 4 years only. This would give the agency an opportunity to get on its feet and
secure its own funding. The Board will need to direct staff as to whether the 4 -year period
begins today or is retroactive. Staff is also recommending that funding be capped at
$256,516 which is the current level.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-55-
n
•
Commissioner Macht felt each agency should be judged on a case-by-case basis,
especially those that are performing a service to the community which is a County
responsibility to some extent. He could not support Policy I(C)(1) and noted that on Page
131, Section III, should read "Children's Services Advisory Committee". He also could not
support Section V(B)(6) regarding salaries as some salaries have been funded in the past.
Mr Baird noted that some of the agencies, such as those funded by the tourist taxes
and Children's Services which has its own ordinance, have their own set of rules. Staff is
suggesting that contracts be drawn up with the quasi -nonprofit agencies, such as the Council
on Aging, the Humane Society, Gifford Youth Activity Center and the Chamber of
Commerce.
Commissioner Macht did not see the rationale for discouraging funding for salaries
as long as the agency is performing the task for which it was designed.
Mr Baird noted that the Tourist Development Council recommended that restriction
in an effort to discourage it. We also do not pay for sick time or vacation pay. These
restrictions are an effort to ease the very difficult position budget staff finds themselves in
each year.
Commissioner Macht noted that funding for the Sports Commission goes to salaries
and it has brought in the Law Enforcement Olympics which will bring in about S 12.25
million dollars over 5 years He asked that the restriction on salaries be removed.
Commissioner Adams noted that agencies receiving $25,000 or more from the
County are required to submit an audit and questioned what assurance we receive from those
agencies receiving less than $25,000.
Mr. Baird explained that the budget office receives all requests and only reimburses
costs. There have been complaints about the cost of audits which can range from $3,000 to
$5,000.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-56-
BR BR F
•
Budget Manager Jason Brown confirmed that invoices with copies of checks in
payment of the invoices are received and confirmed prior to reimbursement.
Commissioner Ginn asked that Item a on Page 140 include a mission statement and
a copy of the by-laws, as well as the organizational structure and the number of meetings
required annually. On Page 141, III(a) she wanted to know whether their Boards set and
approve annual budgets. III(b) should be a requirement under the by-laws and the entity
should be a legal entity.
Mr Baird noted that those requirements could be included in the application. Some
of the very small entities do not have by-laws.
Commissioner Ginn then questioned whether all the entities are 501(c)(3)s, and Mr.
Brown responded that each agency submits a letter with details of their 501(c)(3) status.
County Attorney Bangel advised that all are 501(c)(3) entities.
MOTION WAS MADE BY Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, to adopt
staff's recommendation with the deletion of
V(C)(7)(a), (b) and (c).
Commissioner Ginn wanted to give consideration to capping III, Children's Services
as she felt that there are other agencies which are addressing some of these problems. She
preferred to cap the funding at the current level of $900,000 until Jean Kline furnishes the
Asset Mapping and Needs Assessment. That information should be available before the end
of this year.
Commissioner Macht preferred not to institute a cap as he did not see any difficulty
as long as the ad valorem tax base rises. He believed there are still a lot of unmet needs.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
J1
7J
•
-57-
Chairman Stanbridge and Commissioner Adams had no problem with instituting a
cap until the documentation has been received.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and Commissioner Ginn questioned
whether the Board wished to vote on the Children's Services cap separately.
Commissioner Adams also noted that the Board had not discussed whether the 4 year
limitation would begin now or retroactively. She suggested that they leave it at 4 years,
beginning last year, plus 3 years.
County Attorney Bangel questioned whether the motion included Commissioner
Ginn's application changes, and Commissioner Macht responded that it did not.
Commissioner Adams WITHDREW HER SECOND AND THE MOTION DIED.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, to
approve backup pages 127 through 155 outlining the
new Outside Agency Funding Policy with the
following changes: (1) Item I. Nonprofit Agencies,
C. Amount and Term of Funding for Individual
Nonprofit Agencies, (1)(c) changing the term from
4 years to 3 years, and (2) changing Item III,
Children's Services Agencies, by adding a cap at
$900,000 until receipt of the needs assessment and
asset mapping which should be received in the next
year; otherwise as recommended by staff.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-58-
3 7 7
•
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner
Macht opposed).
COPY OF POLICY IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WITH THE
BACKUP FOR TODAY'S MEETING
11.G.1. CARTER ASSOCIATES - 2ND AMENDMENT TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN
SERVICES - 66TH AVENUE FROM 4TH STREET TO SR -60
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 11, 2002:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directo4
FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine
SUBJECT:
Second Amendment to the Professional Service Agreement for 66th Avenue
from 4`h Street to SR 60 — IRC Project Igo. 9310
DATE: February 11, 2002
DESCRIPTION A\D CONDITIONS
Indian River County entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Carter Associates, Inc. on
November 17, 1998 and approved the First Amendment to the agreement on November 2, 1999.
A re -design of portions of the project are needed in order to minimize right-of-way acquisition
impacts on property owners and minimize construction costs.
The scope of services for this Second Amendment would be to prepare preliminary plans to modify
the roadway alignment and reduce roadway width, where possible, from three lanes to two lanes,
with tum lanes.
A summary of the project design services are as follows:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-59-
Bit
; i1
73
•
Original Contract Price
First Amendment (extended project limits from
12th Street to 4th Street, and providing bridge design)
Current Contract Amount
Proposed Second Amendment
NEW CONTRACT PRICE
$ 66,000.00
$ 95,000.00
$161,000.00
$ 17 820.00
5178,820.00
It is anticipated that after approval of the preliminary plans, prepared under this Second
Amendment to the Agreement, final plans will be required, thus requiring a Third Amendment to
the Agreement for approximately $70,000.00
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Alternative No. 1 - The Board of County Commissioners approves the Second Amendment to the
Professional Services Agreement for 66`h Avenue Paving and Drainage Improvements with Carer
Associates, Inc.
Alternative No. 2 — The Board of County Commissioners does not approve the Second Amendment
to the Professional Services Agreement for 66th Avenue Paving and Drainage Improvements with
Carter Associates, Inc.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1, funding to come from Account No. 109-214-541-
067.74.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Engineering Services Agreement for 66`h Avenue
Paving and Drainage Improvements between 4th Street and SR 60 — IRC Project #9810
2. Letter from Carter Associates, Inc dated January 8, 2002; Addendum No. 2, Professional
Services Agreement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved the Second Amendment to the
Professional Services Agreement for 66`h Avenue
Paving and Drainage Improvements with Carter
Associates, Inc , as recommended by staff.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
AMENDMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-60-
9
11.G.2. RESOLUTION 2002-014 CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT"
COSTS FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH
STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW AND PORTIONS OF 10TH
STREET SW BETWEEN 20TH AVENUE SW AND 18TH
AVENUE SW, DESIGNATED AS PROJECT NO. 9911,
AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY
SUCH PROJECT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 31, 2002:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director
and
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr , P E , County Enginee
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Michelle A. Gentile, CET, Civil Engineer
As -Built Resolution & Assesent Roll for Paving and Drainage Improv ents to
19th Avenue SW between 10 Street SW and 9th Street SW and Portions o 10th Street
SW between 20th Avenue SW * 13th Avenue SW, IRC PROJECT # 991
January 31, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The paving of the above road has been completed. The final assessment is as follows:
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Final Cost
Preliminary Estimates
$ 18,309.64
- 100%
$ 18,309.64
- 100%
$ 14,006.87
- 75%
$ 14,006.87
- 75%
2.08
Acres
2.08
Acres
$ 6,734.07
/per Acre
$ 6,734.07
/per Acre
fee
* This figure includes 2% Tax Collector's
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
1 he final assessment roll has been prepared and is ready to be delivered to the Clerk to the Board.
Assessments have been paid for by the Developer, Tri Partners, LLC.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Since the final assessment to the benefited owners is the same as the preliminary assessment roll, the
only alternative presented is to approve the final assessment roll
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the final assessment roll and the "As -Built Resolution" for the paving of the
above-mentioned road be approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
A11ACHMENTS
1) As -Built Resolution
2) Final Assessment Roll (Exhibit "A")
3) Final Costs
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
adopted Resolution 2002-014 certifying "as -built"
costs for certain paving and drainage improvements
to 19th Avenue SW between 10th Street SW & 9th
Street SW and portions of 10`x' Street SW between
20th Avenue SW and 18`" Avenue SW, designated as
Project No. 9911, and other construction
necessitated by such project.
As -Built (Fourth Reso.)
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 014
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CERTIFYING
"AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 19TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN 10TH
STREET SW & 9TH STREET SW AND PORTIONS OF 10TH
STREET SW BETWEEN 20TH AVENUE SW AND 18TH AVENUE
SW, DESIGNATED AS PROJECT NO. 9911 AND OTHER
CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT;
PROVIDING FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE
FOR PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-62-
1
•
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County determined
that the improvements described herein specially benefited the property located within the
boundaries as described in this title, designated as Project No. 9911, are in the public interest and
promote the public welfare of the county; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2000, the Board held a public hearing in the
Commission Chambers at which time the owners of the property to be assessed were afforded an
opportunity to appear before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making
such improvements; and
WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2000-097 which confirmed the special assessment cost of the project to the property
specially benefited by the project in the amounts listed in an attachment to that resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has certified the actual "as -built" cost now
that the project has been completed is $6,734.07 per acre, which is the same as $6,734.07 per acre in
the confirming Resolution No. 2000-097.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. Resolution No. 2000-097 is modified as follows: The completion date for Project
No. 9911 is declared to be October 15, 2001, and the last day that payment may be made avoiding
interest and penalty charges is ninety (90) days after passage of this resolution.
2. The developer, TRI Partners, LLC, has paid the final assessment for the
property owners on 19th Avenue SW and 10th Street SW, as shown on the Final Assessment. The
amount due from each property owner is $0.00.
3. The assessment roll for said project listed in Resolution No. 2000-097 shall be as set forth
in attached Exhibit "A" to this resolution.
4. The assessments as shown in attached Exhibit "A" shall stand confirmed and remain legal,
valid, and binding first liens against the property against which such assessments are made until paid
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-63-
u
•
5. The assessments shown in Exhibit "A", attached to Resolution No.2000-097 were
recorded by the County on the public records of Indian River County, and the lien shall constitute
prima facie evidence of its validity.
This resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Gi nn , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice -Chairman John W Tippm
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
19th day of February ,2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest
JEN'REY K BARTON
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
Indian
River County
Approved
Date
Administration
gy ?
S
Budget
/
" JJJ�-,4?
2/762---
Legal
)I'/2 '6F2.
Risk Management
^ /
Public Works
,
- i
Q2--'
Engineering
/
eg'
0,2,„
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
•
N
o
O CO O
Z
W (1) cn
- W CC cu
• W w Q
O C
U CC
Q O W
d QH H-
I_ co u)
tIIC) 000
O o
Q 0)
ct
ow
O W
Z
< Q))
0
Z
i O
Z
W
O W
U.
-J W
▪ m
LL
Z LU
LU
• Z
• LU
w <
(1)Q Q)
J r
Z O
LL 1—
TOTAL COST
COST/ACRE
ACREAGE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NAME & ADDRESS
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
}
Ln U] 0 U) Lf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 L()
V Tr O M CO O O) O) 0 O) CO O V' 'Cr
O N O (Ni N O V V O 4 4 6 N N
N- N (A M (+) e U] U) (0 UD LC) to N N
O O II N II r r II r r II O O
r r co- co N N C. N r r
(A Q vi Q vi Q U3 Q
(] m (] m O CO C] m 0
a CL CL a CL
BAL = $0.00
U) LO O
'1" CD
roc o
N N (A
O O II
to
0 m
a
0 0 0 0 0 0
co rte) rte) M M M
N N N N N I*"
CD- CO CD- co co (D
(» a v> 69 v► r»
OD CO CO M (h (O (0
O 0 0 0 0 0
✓ s N
C
D C
O N O Y O
• * Lf)Lt)
O" O m O Y
a
CD no
o D o m o m
CL
Y V U�
co' O
co c0 OO u)
o a o 0 0 0
O 0
N o m W-
00 o0
En-
o o N-
o -o m
0 o05 CD
Ch M O) (O CO Cr) CO
C7 Cil r C7 r Cc)r
C? f) i
CO lr, V coMCO w_ CO co V
aS O] r13 C°
N J CL N J CL N J CL
• N
c)
c
C O1
N
> Cr)
• Q
C L LL
O m
U o
m
Ecom
r
r t.
O
• O
C
O
m
E o
O
N
CO
UC
C LL
M >
Cn Q
05 L N
w CO CO
7 r O
.m Ln
ec
r
N
26-33-39-00002-0005-00007.0
James Whalen
N
*
C O N O #
y O = Or C
o c o D
CO
CL o o Y
o in Y Ln Lp
m O m O CL
0 0 ° 0 0
o
m o0 oO
O W o
c6 m O) co (h
r co CO 1-- CO r
c] CO
J CL N J CL N J CL
U)
co N
Cr)
U)
C CL
(1)
<
L m
r m
r `CD coO
0)) >
Thomas Whalen
Lf)
N
O
O
M
r
r
N
3
O
(O
0)
CV
(13 LO
U) CO U O r
7 J " O CC r
Na) LL >. m Ln
m E
Y 'm 0 of c
O co CU m U)
O U) LOm E
r U) Q) O (D a. u)
CO > I U r CO N
N
N
co Q
S
(O
c
I.L
rn In
•
-65-
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
r
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - REPORT ON
TRIP TO TALLAHASSEE - (1) STORMWATER PLAN - (2)
REDISTRICTING - (3) HALLSTROM FARMSTEAD ON
NATIONAL REGISTER - (4) AMTRAK
Chairman Stanbridge reported on her meetings in Tallahassee last week regarding
lobbying for stormwater money which is very tight. We had requested $4,000,000 for Phase
2 of the Stormwater Plan and will be very lucky to receive $2,000,000.
Senator Pruitt is waiting for the redistricting and revenue lines to come in. They have
not yet set the budgets.
We had also requested a grant review for archeological surveys regarding land
acquisition. Unfortunately the universities got most of the money so we will have to
compete with them for dollars.
We were successful with having the Hallstrom Farmstead added to the National
Register which might bring another $500,000 in grant monies.
The Amtrak proposal is still on at the Washington level where they are trying to break
up the large system and bring back some ridership. That would help us on the east coast.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
-67-
BM
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 11:24 a.m.
ATTEST:
. arton, Clerk Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Minutes Approved
FEBRUARY 19, 2002