Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3/5/2002
MINUTES ATTACHED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA County Commission Chamber County Administration Building 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chaiiulan John W. Tippin, Vice Chaiinian Fran B. Adams Caroline D. Ginn Kenneth R. Macht District 2 District 4 District 1 District 5 District 3 James E Chandler, County Administrator Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. John W. Tippin 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS ADDITIONS: 7.R. Replacement Page 151 9.B. Additional Page 240A 10. Additional Backup - Letter from City of Vero Beach Mayor Tom White 13.D. Legislation Concerning ADA Compliance for Elections 11.C. to 8. - Space for Supervisor of Elections BACKUP PAGES PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Month of March, 2002 as Mental Retardation Awareness Month in Indian River County, Florida Presentation of United Way Torchbearer Plaque and Recognition of Departments/Divisions that Contributed 100% to the 2001/2002 United Way Campaign Presentation of a Donation for the Old Fellsmere School Restoration Fund 0 iF iU PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS (cont'd): D. Presentation by General Services Director Tom Frame on the Renovations of the Old Fellsmere School APPROVAL OF MINUTES BACKUP PAGES A. Regular Meeting of January 22, 2002 B. Regular Meeting of February 5, 2002 C. Regular Meeting of February 12, 2002 CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated February 14, 2002) 9-20 Approval of Warrants (memorandum dated February 21, 2002) 21-33 Appointment to Public Library Advisory Board (memorandum dated February 25, 2002) 34-35 Appointment of George Lawrence to Council of Public Officials (COPO) (memorandum dated February 15, 2002) Membership — Community Health Network (memorandum dated February 18, 2002) 38 Chase Meadows Subdivision Water Main Construction Developer's Agreement Final Pay Request (memorandum dated February 13, 2002) Temporary Water Service Agreement Between Indian River County and Joseph J. Polce (TR) (memorandum dated January 18, 2002) Final Payment IRC Bid No. 3009 Lift Station Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation of Landfill Leachate Collection System (memorandum dated February 19, 2002) Settlement; Workers' Compensation Claim (memorandum dated February 15, 2002) 61 Change Order 441 Sheriff's Evidence Storage Addition / Chilberg Construction Co., Inc. (memorandum dated February 25, 2002) CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): K. Bid Award: IRC #4042 Semi -Annual Bid for Bulk Salt (memorandum dated February 13, 2002) Citrus Springs Village B and Citrus Springs Village C Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk Improvements (memorandum dated February 21, 2002) BACKUP PAGES Waiver of Bid for Purchase of Replacement Dishwasher at County Jail (memorandum dated February 27, 2002) Request to Set a Hearing Date to Consider a Proposed Change to the Countryside/Village Green Development Order (D.O.) (memorandum dated February 27, 2002) 117-132 133-134 Schulke, Bittle, and Stoddard Inc. Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval for a Church to be known as Gifford Church of Christ (memorandum dated February 15, 2002) Gifford Health Clinic (memorandum dated February 26, 2002) 135-141 142-144 Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 10, Block 24, Vero Lake Estates, Unit 5A (memorandum dated February 21, 2002) Miscellaneous Budget Amendment No. 006 (memorandum dated February 27, 2002) 145-148 149-153 Request for Surplus Bridge Slabs and Piling from Henry Fischer & Sons (memorandum dated February 25, 2002) 154-157 B oard Consideration to Approve Grant Agreement for D evelopment of a "Kitching Railhead Station" Historical Interpretive and Educational Display on the North County Regional Park Portion of the St. Sebastian River State B uffer Preserve (memorandum dated February 26, 2002) Proclamation Honoring the LR. Mem. Hosp. Auxiliary on Its 50`h Anniversary 158-176 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES None 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 34.33 ACRES, LOCATED 700 FEET EAST OF US 1, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 45`x' STREET, FROM RM - 6, ML LTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) TO RM -8, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE Dennis and Olska Forbes Request to Rezone 34.33 Acres from RM -6 to RM -8 (Quasi -Judicial) (memorandum dated February 15, 2002) 2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 32.8 ACRES ON TWO ADJACENT PARCELS. THE SOUTHERN PARCEL, COMPRISED OF 12.8 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 26"' STREET AND 66" AVENUE IS TO BE REZONED FROM A-1 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES) TO RM -6, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) THE NORTHERN PARCEL, COMPRISED OF 20 ACRES, IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A QUAR- TER MILE NORTH OF 26"' STREET, ON THE WEST SIDE OF 66" AVENUE, IS TO BE REZONED FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES) TO RS -6, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE), AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE Central Grove Corporation and Seminole Venture, Inc. s request to rezone 12.8 acres from A-1 to RM -6, and 20 acres from A-1 to RS -6 (Quasi -Judicial) (memorandum dated February 20, 2002) 3. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 401, BUILDING CODES, TO ADOPT THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE; PRO - B1( 1 2 1 PG 59 1 BACKUP PAGES 178-193 194-213 • • 9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.): 3. (continued) VIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; ANT) PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request to amend Indian River County Code Chapter 401, Building Codes, to adopt the Florida Building Code (Legislative) (memorandum dated February 26, 2002) 4. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING A WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION THAT COINCIDES WITH FIGURE 1606 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ADOPTING A BASIC WIND SPEED MAP; PROVIDI\G FOR CODIFICATION; AND PRO- VIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request to adopt Indian River County Wind Speed Map (memorandum dated Febnuary 26, 2002) B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Request from Brian T. Heady to "address the County Commission on issues that relate to the power of the gavel" and other various issues (letter dated February 25, 2002) 2. Request from George Racicot to discuss "Code Enforcement's failure to act on complaints" (memorandum dated February 18, 2002) C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS Public Hearings Scheduled for March 12, 2002: 1. Sun -Up of Indian River, Inc. s request for special exception use approval for an adult congregate living facility and for an adult day-care facility. The subject site is located on the south side of 5th Street SW/27th Avenue SW intersection and the Salvation Army facility (Quasi -Judicial) 2. Tn-Partners, L L C 's request for special exception use approval for a self-service storage facility. The subject property is located at 445 27th Avenue SW, just north of the 5th Street SW/27th Avenue SW intersection. The area of development will n1 • BACKUP PAGES 214-243 244-252 253 254 ti PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS (cont'd.): 2. (continued) encompass the western half of the subject pro- perty (Quasi -Judicial) McNab and McNab "V" Inc.'s request to rezone approximately 2.32 acres from CL to PD Commercial and request conceptual PD approval for a restaurant with a drive-through land (Sonny's BBQ) (Legislative) Board of County Commissioners' consideration to approve an option agreement for sale and purchase of the Louis Simonye Parcel addition of the North Sebastian Conservation Area (Legislative) 5. Board of County Commissioners' consideration of and adoption of proposed revisions to the County Tree Protection and Land Clearing Ordinance (continuation from January 22, 2002 public hearing) (Legislative) (memorandum dated February 26, 2002) 255-256 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS Consulting Services with The Conservation Fund Charitable Trust for the Purchase of Lost Tree (memorandum dated February 27, 2002) 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development Approval of Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Conceptual Approval Agreement for Cost -Share Acquisition of the Lost Tree Islands (memorandum dated February 26, 2002) Emergency Services None 257-260 261-284 General Services Space for Supervisor of Elections (memorandum dated February 27, 2002) Leisure Services None 285-303 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): E Office of Management and Budget None Personnel None BACKUP PAGES Public Works 1. Woods Hole Group, Inc , Work Order No. 2 (memorandum dated February 25, 2002) 304-3064\ Approval of Change Order No. 3 for Vero Lake Estates Stoumwater Improvements, Phase I (memorandum dated February 25, 2002) Dial Cordy and Associates Contract Amendment No. 2 (memorandum dated February 25, 2002) 307-315 Acceptance of Revised Amendment 1 from US Fish and Wildlife Service (memorandum dated February 18, 2002) 322-331 Emergency Repair of the 65th Street Bridge (So. Winter Beach Road over Lateral "H" Canal) (memorandum dated February 27, 2002) Award Contract for Public Improvements to Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge (memorandum dated February 27, 2002) 332-337 338-354 H. Utilities Watermain Installation for 47th, 48th and 49th Avenues Between 41St Street and 43rd Street (memorandum dated February 22, 2002) Human Services None 355-371 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY N one 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Updates BACKUP PAGES Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Consideration of the effects of the recently approved Comprehensive Policy for Funding Outside Agencies (no backup provided) 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS A. Emergency Services District None Solid Waste Disposal District 1. Approval of Minutes — Meeting of Feb.12, 2002 IRC Bid #4041 — 5,000 18 gallon Blue Recycle Bins (memorandum dated February 20, 2002) Approval to Award Scale House and Entrance Improvements Contract — IRC Bid #4011 (memorandum dated February 22, 2002) Schools/County Buildings Recycling Program Contract Extension (memorandum dated February 21, 2002) 372-383 384-400 401-414 Environmental Control Board 1. Approval of Minutes — Meeting of Feb. 5, 2002 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS (cont'd.): C. Environmental Control Board (cont'd.): 2. Release of Lien Environmental Control Hearing Board Case No. 294-99 (memorandum dated February 15, 2002) 15. ADJOURNMENT BACKUP PAGES 415-421 Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m. Meeting broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian. • • INDEX TO MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER 1 2. INVOCATION 1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 1 5.A. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MARCH 2002 AS MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH (ARC) 2 5 B PRESENTATION OF UNITED WAY TORCHBEARER PLAQUE AND RECOGNITION OF DEPARTMENTS/DIVISIONS THAT CONTRIBUTED 100% TO THE 2001/2002 UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN 3 5.C. PRESFNTA LION OF A DONATION FOR THE OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL RESTORATION FUND/HISTORICAL SOCIETY/JOHN SCHUMANN FOUNDATION 4 5.D. PRESENTATION BY GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR TOM FRAME ON THE RENOVATION OF THE OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL 4 6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 22, 2002 4 6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5, 2002 5 6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 12, 2002 5 7. CONSENT AGENDA 5 7.A. Approval of Warrants 6 7.B. Approval of Warrants 15 1 <f► 1 dM1a ' "' r • 7.C. Appointment of Scarlett R. Chesser to the Public Library Advisory Board to Replace Phillip Mank, Jr. - District 2 25 7.D. Appointment of George Lawrence to the Council of Public Officials as Representative of Indian River County Hospital District 25 7 E Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Assigned to Community Health Network Committee to Replace Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge 26 7.F. Chase Meadows Subdivision Water Main Construction - Developer's Agreement Final Pay Request 27 7.G. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Joseph J. Polce, Trustee 28 7.H. Lift Station Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation of Landfill Leachate Collection System (Bid #3009) - J & H Waterstop, Inc. and Roe Construction, Inc./AJV - Final Payment 30 7.I. Settlement Worker's Compensation Claim - William C. Tackett 31 7.J. Sheriffs Evidence Storage Addition - Chilberg Construction Co., Inc. - Change Order #1 32 7.K. Bid Award #4042 - Semi -Annual Bid for Bulk Salt - Morton International, Inc 32 7 L Citrus Springs Village B (Phase I and II) and Citrus Springs Village C (Phase I and II) - Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk Improvements - The Suntree Partners 34 7.M. Waiver of Bid for Purchase of Replacement Dishwasher at County Jail - Complete Restaurant Equipment 35 7.N. Schedule a Hearing Date to Consider a Proposed Change to the Countryside/Village Green Development Order (D.O.) (Blue Water Realty) 36 7.0. Schulke, Bittle, and Stoddard, Inc. - One -Year Extension of Conditional Site Plan Approval for Gifford Church of Christ 38 7.P. Gifford Health Clinic - Letter of Authorization to Indian River Memorial Hospital District - Rezone County Property 40 7.Q. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 10, Block 24. Vero Lake Estates, Unit 5A - MGB Construction, Inc. (Lentz) 41 7.R. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment No. 006 42 7.S. Surplus Bridge Slabs and Piling Requested by Henry Fischer & Sons - Public Works Director Requests Authorization for Disposal of Other Similar Non -Inventory Items 46 7.T. Department of Environmental Protection Grant Agreement for Development of a "Kitching Railhead Station" Historical Interpretive and Educational Display on the North County Regional Park Portion of the St. Sebastian River State Buffer Preserve 47 2 r9 8 • • 7.U. Proclamation Honoring the Indian River Memorial Hospital Auxiliary on its 50th Anniversary 49 8.A. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS - GENERAL SERVICES REPORT ON OPTIONS FOR RELOCATION OF OFFICE (Moved from 11.C) 50 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE NO. 2002-005 - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR 34 33 ACRES LOCATED 700 FEET EAST OF US#1 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 45TH STREET FROM RM -6 TO RM -8 - REQUESTED BY DENNIS AND OLSKA FORBES (Quasi -Judicial) 55 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-006 - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR 32.8 ACRES ON TWO PARCELS 12.8 ACRES LOCATED ON THF NW CORNER OF 26TH STREET AND 66TH AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RM -6 AND 20 ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE NORTH OF 26TH STREET ON THE WEST SIDE OF 66TH AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RS -6 - REQUESTED BY CENTRAL GROVE CORPORATION AND SEMINOLE VENTURE, INC. (Quasi -Judicial) 65 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-007 AMENDING CHAPTER 401, BUILDING CODES, TO ADOPT THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (Legislative) 79 9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-008 DESIGNATING A WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION THAT COINCIDES WITH FIGURE 1606 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ADOPTING A BASIC WIND SPEED MAP (Legislative) 90 9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM BRIAN HEADY TO `ADDRESS THE COUNTY COMMISSION ON ISSUES THAT RELATE TO THE POWER OF THE GAVEL' AND OTHER VARIOUS ISSUES 98 9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM GEORGE RACICOT TO DISCUSS ` CODE ENFORCEMENT'S FAILURE TO ACT ON COMPLAINTS' (MOBILE HOME TIE DOWNS) 99 9.C.1-5 PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS - SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 12, 2002: 101 3 n I 1 I • Sun -Up of Indian River, Inc.'s request for special exception use approval for an adult congregate living facility and for an adult day-care facility (South of Salvation Army facility at 5th Street SW - 27th Avenue SW intersection) (Quasi -Judicial) 101 Tri -Partners, L L C 's request for special exception use approval for a self- service storage facility at 445 27th Avenue SW (western half of the property) (Quasi -Judicial) 101 McNab and McNab "V" Inc.'s request to rezone approximately 2.32 acres from CL to PD Commercial and request conceptual PD approval for a restaurant with a drive-through lane (Sonny's BBQ) (Legislative) 102 Option Agreement for sale and purchase of the Louis Simonye Parcel addition of the North Sebastian Conservation Area (Legislative) 102 Consideration of and adoption of proposed revisions to the County Tree Protection and Land Clearing Ordinance (continuation from January 22, 2002 public hearing) (Legislative) 102 10.A. CONSULTING SERVICES WITH THE CONSERVATION FUND CHARITABLE TRUST FOR THE PURCHASE OF LOST TREE - CITY OF VERO BEACH - TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES - FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST 104 11.A. APPROVAL OF FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST (FCT) CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AGREEMENT FOR COST -SHARE ACQUISITION OF THE LOST TREE ISLANDS - CITY OF VERO BEACH - TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES 105 11.C. SPACE FOR SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS (MOVED TO 8) 107 11.G.1. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN - WOODS HOLE GROUP, INC. - WORK ORDER NO. 2 108 11.G.2. VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I, C E M ENTERPRISES, INC. - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 110 4 • • • 11.0.3. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - DIAL CORDY AND ASSOCIATES - CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 111 11.0.4. JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - AMENDMENT NO. 1 - REVISED RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT - U. S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 113 11.0.5. EMERGENCY PURCHASE ORDER - REPAIR OF THE 65TH STREET BRIDGE (SOUTH WINTER BEACH ROAD OVER LATERAL "H" CANAL) - KNIGHT AND MATHIS - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN 2006 114 11.0.6. JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT - SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. - BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC. 116 11.H. WATER MAIN INSTALLATION FOR 47TH, 48TH, AND 49TH AVENUES BETWEEN 41ST STREET AND 43RD STREET (GIFFORD LANDFILL) - FLORIDA WATER SUPPLY RESTORATION PROGRAM 119 13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - UPDATES - SCHOOL BUS ACCIDENT COMMENTS 122 13.D. PROPOSED LEGISLATION CONCERNING AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE FOR ELECTIONS (SENATE BILL 1504) 122 13 E COMMISSIONER MACHT - CONSIDERATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE RECENTLY APPROVED COMPREHENSIVE POLICY FOR FUNDING OUTSIDE AGENCIES 122 14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 125 14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 125 14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD 125 5 n! t • March 5, 2002 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, March 5, 2002. Present were Ruth Stanbridge, Chairman; John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman; Commissioners Fran B Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. INVOCATION Commissioner Ginn delivered the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chairman Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag. 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Chairman Stanbridge announced the following changes to the agenda: Move Item 11C to Item 8, Space for Supervisor of Elections Replacement page 151, item 7.R. March 5, 2002 1 • 4 Additional map Page 240A, item 9.B. Letter (City of Vero Beach) on page 260, Item 10. Additional item requested by Commissioner Ginn, Item 13.D., Senate Bill 1504 concerning amendments to the Florida Election Code. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously made the above changes to the agenda. 5.A. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MARCH 2002 AS MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH (ARC) Chairman Stanbridge read the following proclamation into the record and presented it to Mary Jim Martin who accepted on behalf of ARC and the developmentally disabled of Indian River County. March 5, 2002 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF MARCH, 2002, AS MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, mental retardation is a condition which affects more than 7 million Americans and their families; and WHEREAS, public awareness and education enhance a community's understanding of the issues affecting people with mental retardation; and WHEREAS, people with mental retardation can be vital and vibrant members of our communities, improving the quality of life for all of us; and WHEREAS, the month of March has been designated National Mental Retardation Awareness Month, with more than 120,000 members and 1,000 chapters of the Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) undertaking public awareness, educational and fundraising initiatives; and WHEREAS, the ARC of the United States is the nation's leading volunteer -based organization advocating for and with people with mental retardation and related developmental disabilities and their families. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of March, 2002, be recognized as MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH in Indian River County, Florida, and urges the citizens of Indian River County to give full support towards efforts to enable people with mental retardation to live full and productive lives of inclusion in our communities. 2 U Len "7'1 etij 3 wN 0 • Adopted this 5th day of March, 2002. • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chaifiian 5.B. PRESENTATION OF UNITED WAY TORCHBEARER PLAQUE AND RECOGNITION OF DEPARTMENTS/DIVISIONS THAT CONTRIBUTED 100% TO THE 2001/2002 UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN Commissioner Macht credited the County Commissioners, employees, (particularly Jim Romanek) and departments for exceeding the goal set for this year's fund raising. Recognition certificates for 100% participation were announced for Board of County Commissioners, Office of the County Administrator, Probation, Telecommunications, General Services, Central Services, and Community Development. Parks Division Superintendent Jim Romanek credited Commissioner Macht for setting the Torchbearer goal for the County employees and for his leadership, commitment, and support. He explained that this meant we had to raise $12,000 which we exceeded. He then presented the Torchbearer plaque for Indian River County for the 2001-2002 campaign from the United Way to Chairman Stanbridge. Commissioner Macht credited the entire success of this accomplishment to Mr. Romanek. Then Chairman Stanbridge presented a small plaque of appreciation to Jim Romanek for his efforts in this year's campaign. March 5, 2002 3 4r • 5.C. PRESENTATION OF A DONATION FOR THE OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL RESTORATION FUND (HISTORICAL SOCIETY/JOHN SCHUMANN FOUNDATION) Clarence "Korky" Korker presented a ceremonial check for $20,000 to Chairman Stanbridge for the Old Fellsmere School Restoration Fund from the Historical Society which carne through from the John Schumann Foundation. Fellsmere Mayor Joel Tyson advised that the restoration program is still alive and well and some things have started happening. There is still a need to get another $1,000,000 toward the completion of this facility. It will be a great facility when completed and he thanked the Board for their help. 5.D. PRESENTATION BY GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR TOM FRAME ON THE RENOVATION OF THE OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL General Services Director Tom Frame credited "Korky" Korker, Mayor Joel Tyson, Commissioner Adams, and Chairman Stanbridge for their strong support of this effort. He advised that nearly $600,000 have already raised from the following sources: $116,000 Save Our School Committee (with $50,000 of that reserved for the restoration of the auditorium on the top floor of the building); miscellaneous donations of $4,698; the Schumann Foundation donation in the amount of $20,000; and the Harriet V. and Harry T. Moore grants totaling $150,000. During the last legislative session a Florida Historical Grant was provided in the amount of $250,000. It all adds up to over $540,000 which is a substantial start but short of the total needed. He reported that the exterior of the building was nearly complete and then most of the work will shift to the interior. 6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 22, 2002 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 22, 2002, there were none. March 5, 2002 4 • ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the minutes of January 22, 2002, as written and distributed. 6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5, 2002 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 5, 2002, there were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the minutes of February 5, 2002, as written and distributed. 6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 12, 2002 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 12, 2002, there were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the minutes of February 12, 2002, as written and distributed. 7. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Adams requested that Item 7.S. be separated from the Consent Agenda for discussion. March 5, 2002 5 p • 7.A. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 14, 2002: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: February 14, 2002 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of February 07 2001 to February 14, 2002. Attachment: ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk for the period February 7-14, 2002, as requested. CHECK NUMBER 0021592 O 021593 0021594 O 021595 0021596 O 021597 O 021598 O 021599 0021600 O 021601 O 021602 O 021603 O 021604 0021605 0021606 0021607 0021608 O 021609 O 021610 March 5, 2002 NAME NACO/SOUTHEAST IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- H IGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE H IGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE - AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA) UNUM LIFE INSURANCE TOLFA, BECKY KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IRS - ACS CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. 6 CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 2002-02-07 25.00 2002-02-08 28,575.00 2002-02-08 4,176.60 2002-02-08 267.30 2002-02-08 4,822.09 2002-02-08 2,364.18 2002-02-08 580.58 2002-02-08 12,315.15 2002-02-11 933.88 2002-02-11 4,065.80 2002-02-11 116.86 2002-02-13 138.50 2002-02-13 37.75 2002-02-13 115.38 2002-02-13 177.00 2002-02-13 50.00 2002-02-13 50.00 2002-02-13 639.86 2002-02-13 2,480.00 BR 121 • CHECK NUMBER O 021611 0021612 O 021613 O 021614 O 021615 O 021616 0021617 O 021618 O 317683 O 317684 O 317685 O 317686 O 317687 O 317688 O 317689 O 317690 O 317691 O 317692 O 317693 O 317694 O 317695 O 317696 O 317697 O 317698 O 317699 O 317700 O 317701 O 317702 O 317703 O 317704 O 317705 0317706 O 317707 O 317708 0317709 O 317710 O 317711 O 317712 O 317713 O 317714 O 317715 O 317716 O 317717 O 317718 O 317719 O 317720 O 317721 O 317722 O 317723 O 317724 O 317725 O 317726 O 317727 O 317728 O 317729 O 317730 O 317731 O 317732 O 317733 NAME INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT NACO/SOUTHEAST SALEM TRUST COMPANY SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE FL SDU TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC ABC-CLIO INC AT&T WIRELESS ACE PLUMBING, INC ACTION TRANSMISSION AND ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP ALPHA ACE HARDWARE ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO ATCO TOOL SUPPLY ATLAS PEN & PENCIL CORP AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, ATLANTIC REPORTING ADAMSON, RONALD ABS PUMPS, INC AQUAGENIX ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING ASCE/MEMBERSHIP ADDISON OIL CO AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT'L A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC ARCH WIRELESS ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO A T & T APOLLO ENTERPRISES ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT AARP INSURANCE PLAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC ARMY/NAVY OUTDOORS ALLIED TRAILER SALES & RENTALS ARNOLD AIR CONDITIONING INC A T & T AETNA US HEALTHCARE AT&T BROADBAND AMAZON HOSE ALLIED ELECTRIC MOTORS AND ALLEN, MILDRED G AMERICA'S HEALTH CHOICE AMERICA PIONEER BIO -SERVICES OF VERO, INC BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY BREATHING AIR SYSTEMS DIVISION BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK March 5, 2002 CHECK DATE 2002-02-13 2002-02-13 2002-02-13 2002-02-13 2002-02-13 2002-02-13 2002-02-13 2002-02-13 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 7 CHECK AMOUNT 79,038.47 183.24 9,997.20 287.82 132.46 8,639.23 4,021.31 1,996.09 33.50 38.52 10.81 144.45 1,326.65 242.00 1,785.25 216.30 6.49 270.70 711.12 801.87 75.21 357.44 1,330.83 152.60 1,061.26 318.50 281.00 119.80 145.00 205.00 96.68 4,085.76 23.54 46,176.04 940.30 145.60 97.00 215.66 222.34 34.29 20,472.24 52.24 147.66 522.00 150.00 2,515.00 21.95 50.60 39.95 190.00 585.96 52.24 347.77 157.72 300.00 171.00 189.44 47,860.78 1,949.00 • 81t 1 2 ! CHECK NUMBER O 317734 O 317735 0317736 O 317737 0317738 O 317739 O 317740 O 317741 0317742 O 317743 O 317744 O 317745 0317746 0317747 NAME BARTON, BAKER & BRODART BAKER & BOWKER BEVERAGE STOP, THE BOOKS ON TAPE INC BELLSOUTH BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF BRADFORD, MADGE A BARKWELL, MICHAEL BLACKMON, SHANITA BARROW, MARIA E BIOSYSTEMS JEFFREY K -CLERK TAYLOR INC CO TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 0317748 BOYD JR, ETHEL O 317749 BLUE SHIELD FLORIDA STATE O 317750 BLUE SHIELD NEW JERSEY O 317751 BRANCARD, ANABELLE O 317752 BELLSOUTH O 317753 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC O 317754 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL O 317755 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC O 317756 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO O 317757 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE O 317758 CALL ONE, INC O 317759 CLEANNET USA O 317760 COWBOY PLASTICS O 317761 CRITIC'S CHOICE VIDEO 0317762 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT O 317763 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT O 317764 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND O 317765 COPYCO INC O 317766 COLUMBIA HOUSE O 317767 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN O 317768 0317769 O 317770 O 317771 O 317772 O 317773 O 317774 CUSTOM TRAILER, INC CARQUEST AUTO PARTS COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC & COLUMBIA PROPANE CINGULAR WIRELESS CUTRONE MARC CRAWFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY O 317775 CLARK, MARY O 317776 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND O 317777 DAILY COURIER SERVICE O 317778 DELTA SUPPLY CO O 317779 DEMCO INC O 317780 DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC O 317781 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC O 317782 DISCOVERY BOOK COMPANY O 317783 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF O 317784 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC O 317785 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF O 317786 DAVIS, JERRY O 317787 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING & O 317788 DADE PAPER COMPANY O 317789 DAVID BROOKER PROMOTIONS O 317790 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC O 317791 DILLARD, CASSIE O 317792 DOUBLETREE HOTEL O 317793 DOUBLETREE GUEST SUITES March 5, 2002 8 CHECK DATE 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 CHECK AMOUNT 79.88 919.25 5,909.77 211.42 228.71 90.00 752.92 27,092.81 41,756.12 623.00 15.00 41.20 80.00 383.92 30.00 102.84 40.75 49.96 1,773.88 570.33 43.00 74,744.55 500.00 6,740.66 25.00 20,537.72 190.29 496.53 9.75 6.50 199.50 159.92 21.57 2,733.18 9,123.00 344.12 583.15 38.01 315.99 2,796.00 69,811.20 52.57 256.00 1,030.00 289.98 2,052.70 582.12 4,643.70 177.82 500.00 19,846.53 500.00 319.28 6,975.00 603.96 255.85 225.15 19.31 270.00 153.00 • CHECK NUMBER O 317794 O 317795 O 317796 O 317797 O 317798 O 317799 O 317800 O 317801 O 317802 O 317803 O 317804 O 317805 O 317806 O 317807 O 317808 O 317809 O 317810 O 317811 O 317812 O 317813 O 317814 O 317815 O 317816 O 317817 O 317818 O 317819 O 317820 O 317821 O 317822 O 317823 O 317824 O 317825 O 317826 O 317827 0317828 O 317829 O 317830 O 317831 O 317832 O 317833 O 317834 O 317835 0317836 0317837 O 317838 O 317839 O 317840 O 317841 O 317842 O 317843 O 317844 O 317845 O 317846 O 317847 O 317848 0317849 0317850 NAME D ILLON, EDWARD D D IAL, CORDY & ASSOCIATES INC DELL, PAUL MD D IGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC D WINELL, JANIE E DANCY, BASIL DAIGE, DEBORAH E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC E G P, INC EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES E G P INC EMS SOLUTIONS INC FEDEX FELLSMERE, CITY OF FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC FLORIDA FLORIDA FLORIDA FOOTJOY FLOWERS FLORIDA FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO POWER & LIGHT COMPANY SLUDGE, INC BAKING COMPANY OF POWER & LIGHT DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK FLORIDA FIRE MARSHALL'S & FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE FENIMORE, CHARLES FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE F & W PUBLICATIONS INC FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH FELIX EQUITIES, INC FIRST UNION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDICINE FORT BEND SERVICES, INC FERRELLGAS GALE GROUP, THE GENERAL GMC, TRUCK GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC GREYHOUND LINES, INC. GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER GS EQUIPMENT INC GORHAM, JONATHAN GULFSTREAM MEDIA GROUP GOLFBALL GRAPHICS, LLC GENES AUTO GLASS HAMMOND & SMITH, P A H ICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT HACH COMPANY H IGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER HOLIDAY BUILDERS HANSEN, SUSAN HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS March 5, 2002 CHECK DATE 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 9 CHECK AMOUNT 300.00 1,966.95 750.00 320.50 50.00 33.64 30.00 83.50 695.00 269.50 420.00 840.00 47.74 56.32 51.50 3,036.31 605.20 22,065.03 4,905.00 302.78 141.30 273.25 168.13 7.25 40.00 60.00 195.00 105.00 33.66 3,021.72 543.38 232,571.67 21,253.79 500.00 100.00 7,779.24 113.55 930.96 535.87 118.61 5,176.30 283.00 839.03 2,998.56 66.06 26.00 215.00 290.00 38,200.00 4,325.24 192.45 200.00 15.00 500.00 313.24 8,492.45 6,250.00 BK l2 ;.n I0 • CHECK NUMBER O 317851 O 317852 0317853 0317854 O 317855 O 317856 O 317857 NAME HEISEY, MICHAEL HARRIGAN, TEANNA HOWARD JOHNSON EXPRESS HIERS, SHELLY HERAN, DEAN HAPPY SOFTWARE, INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY O 317858 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID O 317859 I B M CORPORATION O 317860 0317861 O 317862 O 317863 O 317864 O 317865 O 317866 0317867 O 317868 O 317869 0317870 0317871 O 317872 O 317873 O 317874 O 317875 O 317876 O 317877 O 317878 O 317879 O 317880 O 317881 O 317882 O 317883 O 317884 O 317885 O 317886 O 317887 O 317888 O 317889 O 317890 O 317891 O 317892 O 317893 O 317894 O 317895 O 317896 O 317897 O 317898 0317899 O 317900 O 317901 0317902 O 317903 O 317904 O 317905 O 317906 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IZOD. CLUB INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE - IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO, INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INGERSOLL-RAND FINANCIAL SERV JACKSON ELECTRONICS JOHN DEERE COMPANY J & H WATERSTOP INC JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA JACOBSON, GARY ALAN JONES, CHARLIE KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC KOUNS, DARLENE KRUGER CONSTRUCTION CORP KOMARNICKI, WALTER SR K -MART #7294 KRISS, HOLDEN E KELLER, JENAE LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE LUCAS WATERPROOFING CO, INC LOS ANGELES DODGERS, INC LADA, STEPHEN LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. LEWIS, RUTH A LANDRUM, GREGORY C PSY D LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS LABOR FINDERS LUNA, JUVENAL LIGHTNING LEASING INC LANCY, OLIVEANN, PA LANDIA INC MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP MCCALL ELECTRIC, INC MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC MATRX MEDICAL INC March 5, 2002 CHECK DATE 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 10 �A CHECK. AMOUNT 5.00 10.30 99.00 400.00 50.00 7,755.00 129,091.11 713.50 1,023.59 778.70 46.11 597.69 261.26 8,463.82 743.38 155.45 1,359.95 665.77 302.23 281,414.20 1,503.16 33.00 49.90 19,027.42 7,310.16 946.00 13,606.56 93,659.40 89.90 15.00 1,000.00 6,095.02 141.62 45.00 150.00 344.52 153.12 50.21 5,700.00 130.00 237.50 27.29 567.23 44.34 150.00 150.00 4,457.15 129.50 125.00 150.00 8,905.00 4,235.07 2,351.34 4,679.35 15,385.50 1,658.57 611 • CHECK NUMBER O 317907 O 317908 O 317909 O 317910 O 317911 O 317912 O 317913 O 317914 O 317915 O 317916 O 317917 O 317918 O 317919 O 317920 O 317921 O 317922 O 317923 O 317924 O 317925 O 317926 O 317927 O 317928 O 317929 O 317930 O 317931 O 317932 O 317933 O 317934 O 317935 O 317936 O 317937 O 317938 O 317939 O 317940 O 317941 O 317942 O 317943 O 317944 O 317945 O 317946 O 317947 O 317948 O 317949 O 317950 O 317951 O 317952 O 317953 O 317954 O 317955 O 317956 O 317957 O 317958 O 317959 O 317960 O 317961 O 317962 O 317963 March 5, 2002 NAME • MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC MORNING STAR/NEW WAVE M G B CONSTRUCTION MULLER MINTZ, P A MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL MEDCHECK MEZZINA, PATRICIA MITCHELL TRAINING, INC MARTIN, CRISTI METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC MONTGOMERY TECHNOLOGY, INC MEDTRONIC PHYSIO -CONTROL MCGRIFF, APRIL MEDTRONICS PHYSIO -CONTROL MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION NEW READERS PRESS NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC NAN MCKAY & ASSOCIATES, INC NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE NAMAR COMMUNICATIONS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY NU CO 2, INC NORTRAX SE L.L.C. NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES NOWLIN, TIAIRA OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE OMNIGRAPHICS, INC OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS OFFICE DEPOT, INC OSCEOLA PHARMACY ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO ON ITS WAY PARKS RENTAL INC PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION PAVCO CONSTRUCTION, INC PORT CONSOLIDATED PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES PRESS JOURNAL P IONEER SCREEN CO INC P UBLIX PHARMACY #0385 PACKARD ROOFING PUBLIX PHARMACY #0642 PERSONNEL PLUS INC P ING, INC PROSPER, JANET C PROFORMA PESHA, JESSICA POINTE WEST LTD 11 CHECK DATE 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 Bi► CHECK AMOUNT 130.95 2,227.35 500.00 26.00 738.61 366.00 1,419.49 479.00 1,600.00 66.50 9,360.00 302.00 500.49 139.05 2,043.28 282.94 893.61 24.29 214.00 41,815.54 55.00 50.00 105.81 94.16 745.80 1,573.29 23.17 102.31 37.55 113.40 2,497.20 204.33 2,272.50 453.35 364.04 221.56 78.20 9.58 162.19 61.43 113,339.80 18,079.50 2,219.45 109.00 174.21 153.00 133.35 30.00 71.90 30.00 89.85 570.00 188.83 70.00 163.60 38.62 14,047.20 1 • CHECK NUMBER O 317964 0317965 O 317966 O 317967 O 317968 O 317969 O 317970 0317971 O 317972 0317973 0317974 O 317975 O 317976 O 317977 O 317978 O 317979 O 317980 O 317981 O 317982 O 317983 O 317984 0317985 O 317986 O 317987 O 317988 NAME PARALEE COMPANY INC POWER SYSTEMS RINKER MATERIALS ROHANI, SASAN RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC RANGEMASTER S E, INC ROMANEK, JAMES RECORDED BOOKS, LLC RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE ROYAL CUP COFFEE REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING ROSEN PUBLISHING GROUP ROSEN PLAZA REHMAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC RS ELECTRONICS S COTT'S SPORTING GOODS SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, S T LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC SAFESPACE INC SEMBLER, CHARLES W S IGNS IN A DAY SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL O 317989 SEXTON, HILDY O 317990 SPALDING O 317991 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC O 317992 STORYTIME PRODUCTIONS O 317993 SAFECO, INC O 317994 SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA O 317995 SWOPE RECONSTRUCTION O 317996 SOUTHERN/ALARM PARTNERS O 317997 SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS O 317998 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT O 317999 SPHERION O 318000 SUNCOAST COUNSELING & O 318001 SANDOVAL, ERIC 5 O 318002 SEYMOUR, LINDA 0318003 SERRA, RACHEL O 318004 SUNNYTECH INC- FL O 318005 STEPHENS & ASSOCIATES, INC O 318006 STEPHENS, LARRY O 318007 SMITH & COMPANY, INC O 318008 ST PETER'S HUMAN SERVICES, INC O 318009 O 318010 O 318011 O 318012 O 318013 O 318014 O 318015 O 318016 O 318017 O 318018 O 318019 O 318020 O 318021 O 318022 O 318023 March 5, 2002 SVI SYSTEMS INC SOUTHERN GULF WEST S EQUOIA VOTING SYSTEMS S CRIPPS TREASURE COAST SAMMARTINO, AL AND TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC TITLEIST TRI -SURE CORPORATION TREASURE REFUSE COAST TESNOW, RONALD L TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD SMITH, TERRY L TREASURE COAST REFUSE SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP 12 CHECK DATE 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 CHECK AMOUNT 375.00 221.33 3,244.97 6.00 450.53 150.00 17.00 1,902.77 165.00 79.00 100.82 1,152.22 95.00 3,480.00 442.40 90.72 116.71 794.70 8.98 43.98 29.95 2,026.83 254.25 125.00 309.00 80.00 1,225.25 501.94 239.20 248.00 853.27 319.17 337.50 67.50 25.00 241.65 1,575.00 66.95 273.00 55.36 223.74 500.00 154.00 312,999.32 433.88 45.00 1,000.00 250.00 136.99 2,157.96 5,804.80 2,949.28 393,583.86 253.55 163.38 40.00 7.65 251.34 1,211.17 1,958.00 I PG Li 13 • CHECK NUMBER O 318024 O 318025 O 318026 O 318027 O 318028 O 318029 O 318030 O 318031 O 318032 O 318033 O 318034 O 318035 O 318036 O 318037 O 318038 O 318039 O 318040 O 318041 O 318042 O 318043 O 318044 O 318045 O 318046 O 318047 O 318048 O 318049 O 318050 O 318051 O 318052 O 318053 O 318054 0318055 O 318056 O 318057 O 318058 O 318059 O 318060 O 318061 O 318062 O 318063 O 318064 O 318065 O 318066 0318067 O 318068 O 318069 O 318070 O 318071 O 318072 O 318073 O 318074 O 318075 O 318076 O 318077 O 318078 O 318079 O 318080 O 318081 March 5, 2002 NAME TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL TROPIC PEST CONTROL SERV, INC THORRY, ANDREW UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA CTQP UNITED PARCEL SERVICE U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC VELDE FORD, INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO FURNITURE MART, INC VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT VERO BEARING & BOLT VERO HERITAGE, INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF WILLHOFF, PATSY WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC WILSON GOLF DIVISION WATERWORKS CAR WASH WILLIAMS, VANNIE WILLOW BEND BOOKS & FAMILY WASTE MANAGEMENT WILLIAMS FAMILY MEDICINE WATSON TITLE INSURANCE, INC WALKER, KEITH WOODS OF VERO BEACH WATERFORD LAKES OF INDIAN WESTERN VIDEO, INC WASHBURN, DANIEL JOE JR WOMEN'S GOLF UNLIMITED WORRELL, FRANCENE WELLS, JOAN XEROX CORPORATION XEROX CORPORATION THOMAS, JAMES SR TURNER, TOBY MILLER, JOSEPH PRESTON, SIGLINDE WODTKE, RUSSELL LICARI, LINDA ROYAL, THOMAS HOLIDAY BUILDERS BAITA PROPERTY PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES AMERITREND HOMES WINDSOR PROPERTIES MCDONALD PROPERTIES SOUTHERN GULF PRIME OUTLETS BURGOON & BERGER KNITTER, KENNETH HENSLEY, BRIAN KAMPUS,ELIZABETH HOLLEN,PEGGY SWEEZEY,KENT J 13 CHECK DATE 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 CHECK AMOUNT 78.01 24.00 180.00 8,432.00 525.00 23.30 7,285.75 5,027.44 2,242.06 38,377.29 633.72 40.94 88.18 1,920.00 100.00 173.49 873.51 263.06 130.00 145.50 778.74 106.00 15.00 464.93 142.08 26.00 10,000.00 90.00 257.27 6,820.00 6,628.16 61.80 53.28 6.00 1,350.00 794.00 1,540.00 174.62 594.00 665.44 148.31 295.97 408.68 582.98 63.56 61.15 105.52 137.44 39.39 112.70 11.73 55.19 10.50 42.28 31.78 46.77 28.28 43.65 BIC i I PG • CHECK NUMBER O 318082 O 318083 O 318084 O 318085 O 318086 0318087 O 318088 O 318089 O 318090 O 318091 O 318092 O 318093 O 318094 O 318095 O 318096 O 318097 O 318098 0318099 O 318100 O 318101 O 318102 O 318103 O 318104 0318105 O 318106 O 318107 O 318108 O 318109 O 318110 O 318111 O 318112 O 318113 O 318114 O 318115 O 318116 O 318117 O 318118 O 318119 O 318120 O 318121 O 318122 O 318123 O 318124 O 318125 O 318126 O 318127 O 318128 O 318129 O 318130 O 318131 O 318132 O 318133 O 318134 O 318135 O 318136 O 318137 O 318138 March 5, 2002 NAME KRUKAUSKAS,FRANK WEISS, JOHN A RIVERA, RICHARD S PERLING, HELEN HERIBERTO, RAY NAGLE, DOROTHY MARTINDALE, MICHAEL OVERTON, TODD HORACE, BACON E STATE OF PETER SABONJOHN MAYMON, PAUL L FIKA, GEORGE OFSTIE, HAROLD A FLOODTIDE INC MGB CONSTRUCTION REARDANZ, MARVIN POSADA, IGNACIO HAYHURST, WILLIAM D ICKINSON, DIANNE GHO VERO BEACH INC RAMIREZ, KELLI BEAZER HOMES CORP OPTICAL WORLD TIMMER, DAWN SYBIL INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP SUPPLEE, CHARLES INDIAN RIVER CUSTOM HOMES VAN TASSEL, DARREN A CHANNING CORP XXIX SNOW, JACQUES AND DENISE MCDONALD PROPERTIES ADAMS, PAMELA HOYT, WINIFRED BURLEY, MARGARET SEACOAST GIFT BASKETS, INC KEIGLEY, EVELYN TURNER, JANE R COMAS, VILNA D ICKINSON, EARL F CONNELL, ALAN G PAVCO CONSTRUCTION INC BROWN, DORIS H FERENCE, THOMAS BENJAMIN FULLER, RICHARD S NELLBAKER, JAMES GALLAGHER, MICHAEL J & SUZANNE CROUCH, LARRY ARCURE, ANGELO STRANSKY, ERIC WEIST, MIKE HARMON,PATTI EMRICK, CATHERINE ZULLO, DAVID BANOV, AMY BRACKETT, ROBERT COMPARETTA,RAYMOND EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA ENERGY 14 CHECK DATE 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 2002-02-14 BK CHECK AMOUNT 2.27 23.69 4.95 52.79 37.96 26.41 34.40 21.72 24.92 77.16 109.64 22.43 160.49 85.71 76.95 74.43 239.97 39.06 19.65 223.40 18.46 52.69 59.91 7.38 86.22 11.02 23.41 73.30 5.34 107.24 25.37 73.93 88.29 13.29 40.66 8.63 67.89 44.26 25.57 50.00 68.55 40.55 9.75 71.54 39.84 33.11 68.22 8.04 56.12 67.75 8.60 47.81 42.62 87.63 38.32 26.47 128.35 2,683,758.48 f k L • 7.B. Approval of Warrants The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 21, 2002: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: February 21, 2002 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS FROM: EDWI'v M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the time period of February 15 2001 to February 21, 2002. Attachment: ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list of warrants issued by the Clerk for the period February 15-21, 2002, as requested. CHECK NAME NUMBER O 021619 O 021620 O 021621 O 021622 0021623 O 318139 O 318140 O 318141 O 318142 O 318143 O 318144 O 318145 O 318146 O 318147 O 318148 O 318149 O 318150 O 318151 O 318152 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY KNITTER, KENNETH AMERON HOMES INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL A A FIRE EOUIPMENT, INC ADRON FENCE COMPANY ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC ALBERTSON'S #4357 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO ATCO TOOL SUPPLY AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH, ATLANTIC REPORTING ABS PUMPS, INC ACTION DIESEL INJECTION AA ELECTRIC S E INC ADVANCE RESTAURANT SUPPLY A T & T CHECK DATE 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 - 02-15 - 02-15 - 02-15 - 02-15 - 02-18 - 02-21 -02-21 - 02-21 -02-21 - 02-21 -02-21 -02-21 - 02-21 - 02-21 - 02-21 - 02-21 -02-21 - 02-21 -02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 1,300.00 31.78 10.50 59.95 148,954.81 403.75 753.00 35.00 850.04 6.26 210.45 15.00 1,399.16 146.40 912.10 303.04 454.45 1,995.00 16.59 • March 5, 2002 15 CHECK NUMBER 0318153 0318154 0318155 O 318156 O 318157 0318158 O 318159 O 318160 0318161 0318162 O 318163 O 318164 O 318165 O 318166 O 318167 O 318168 NAME AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES AMERIPATH FL, INC A T & T APOLLO ENTERPRISES AMERITREND HOMES AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC AKE, RICHARD -CLERK OF CIRCUIT AHEAD HEADGEAR INC ATLANTIC PSYCHIATRIC CENTER ABSOLUTE PROTECTION TEAM ASSOCIATES IN PSYCHIATRY AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BENSONS LOCK SERVICE ERNAN ASSOCIATES ETTER BUSINESS FORMS, INC REVARD RENTALS, INC ARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK URGOON BERGER REVARD COUNTY CLERK OF AKER & TAYLOR INC AKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT OYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION REVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC OKS ON TAPE INC AZER HOMES, INC B 0318169 B O 318170 B O 318171 B 0318172 B 0318173 B O 318174 B O 318175 B 0318176 B O 318177 B 0318178 BO 0318179 BE O 318180 BE O 318181 BR O 318182 BRE O 318183 BI O 318184 BO O 318185 BR BA BEL CAME COL CO CHAM CAT CLE CRE CAS CO AFTE CDW CENT CULT CENT CARQ CITG CING CLARR CARN GEOR CENT COAST CRITT CAL g TTER COPY CENTER, A EVARD ANESTHESIA SERVICES YARD TITLE L L C OMASS PROCESSING YS & GIRLS CLUB OF IRC IGGS EQUIPMENT UCHMAN, BERTA B H LSOUTH RON & BARKLEY CO D AIR DISTRIBUTORS MMUNICATIONS INT'L INC BER OF COMMERCE HOLIC CHARITIES M, POLACKWICH AND VOCELLE D IT, NORMAN S INARI, CHRIS MMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES RTHOUGHTS GOVERMENT INC ER FOR EMOTIONAL AND URAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN ER FOR COUNSELING & UEST AUTO PARTS O PETROLEUM CORP ULAR WIRELESS Y, ALISON EY, DAVID GE CAVALIER CONSTRUCTION RAL LOCATING SERVICE, LTD AL BIO -SYSTEMS ENDEN, CAROL UILDERS, INC O 318186 0318187 O 318188 O 318189 O 318190 O 318191 O 318192 O 318193 O 318194 O 318195 0318196 0318197 0318198 O 318199 O 318200 O 318201 O 318202 O 318203 O 318204 0318205 0318206 0318207 O 318208 O 318209 0318210 O 318211 March 5, 2002 16 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 887.74 49.68 68.00 34.00 97.88 500.00 400.00 10.00 183.15 46.00 179.94 46.00 35.00 11,389.60 4.50 41.10 534.69 940.06 3,916.00 500.00 11.00 442.15 14.36 15.68 1,666.42 170.44 500.00 69.98 522.29 7,500.00 111,688.27 5,084.02 58,871.00 40.00 712.03 231.09 1,434.84 481.63 1,069.32 4,160.42 196.34 15.00 178.93 19,212.77 81.07 689.11 228.00 5,956.16 250.00 581.21 4,296.35 445.70 12.00 15.00 335.15 492.50 380.00 120.00 67.81 61( 1 2 2 PG 6 1 7 • • CHECK NAME NUMBER O 318212 O 318213 O 318214 O 318215 O 318216 O 318217 O 318218 O 318219 O 318220 O 318221 O 318222 O 318223 O 318224 O 318225 O 318226 O 318227 O 318228 O 318229 O 318230 O 318231 O 318232 O 318233 O 318234 O 318235 O 318236 O 318237 O 318238 O 318239 O 318240 O 318241 O 318242 O 318243 O 318244 O 318245 DATA SUPPLIES, INC DELTA SUPPLY CO D EMCO INC D ICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC D UVAL FORD DOGFANCY MAGAZINE DAVIDSON TITLES, INC DADE PAPER COMPANY DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC DANIEL KELL TELEPHONE D ILLARD, CASSIE D ETKO, CATHY D ILLON, EDWARD D DOYLE, STEVEN D EAN, RINGERS, MORGAN AND D IGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC E G P, INC ELPEX, INC EXPEDITER INC, THE E COTECH CONSULTANTS, INC EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE EVERGLADES FARM ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS OF EAST & WEST TRADE CENTER FGFOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE ADDISON OIL CO FELLSMERE, CITY OF FLORIDA FLORIDA FLORIDA FLORIDA FLOWERS FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY BAKING COMPANY OF DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON O 318246 FLOW -TECHNOLOGY O 318247 FRAZIER, WILLIAM H MD O 318248 FLORIDAFFINITY, INC O 318249 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT O 318250 FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE O 318251 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC O 318252 FPL O 318253 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH O 318254 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE O 318255 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC O 318256 FRENCH, GEORGE O 318257 FERRELLGAS O 318258 GALE GROUP, THE O 318259 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC O 318260 GENE EDWARDS, INC O 318261 GROVE'S DICTIONARIES INC O 318262 POWELL, ELIZABETH GAMBINO O 318263 GEISLER-STEINER, MARCIA J O 318264 GREGORY HARRIS, PHD, CVE O 318265 GAGNON, NATHAN & TABBATHA O 318266 HALLIDAY, TODD 0318267 HESS, INC O 318268 HICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT O 318269 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES O 318270 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO O 318271 HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER March 5, 2002 17 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 200.00 286.66 105.80 133,931.49 27,974.00 27.97 3,708.40 259.22 95.15 62.50 19.31 75.00 300.00 37.90 394.80 2,546.20 85.50 164.00 1,978.70 780.73 3,000.00 2,922.50 412.35 139.70 6,755.00 280.00 646.65 20.33 192,476.08 325.90 61,212.18 50.00 77.01 1,917.19 95.20 400.00 6,077.50 25.00 46.00 350.00 205.01 62.86 874.40 2,503.00 4,513.22 154.75 715.75 233.17 1,245.35 385.00 222.81 171.50 321.05 25.59 9,545.00 2,420.00 8,819.58 672.77 119.00 2,083.33 By ru • CHECK NAME NUMBER O 318272 HACH COMPANY O 318273 HARRIS SANITATION, INC O 318274 HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER O 318275 HUSSAMY, OMAR MD O 318276 HEALTHSOUTH TREASURE COAST O 318277 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 0318278 HOLIDAY INN O 318279 HUTCHINSON, JERELENE O 318280 HARRIGAN, TEANNA O 318281 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO O 318282 HAMMOND, SLANTON O 318283 HALL, CATHERINE O 318284 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID O 318285 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH 0318286 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY O 318287 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC O 318288 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY O 318289 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL O 318290 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL O 318291 I B M CORP-DVU O 318292 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE O 318293 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S O 318294 IMI -NET, INC O 318295 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY O 318296 INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS O 318297 INDIAN RIVER WALK-IN CARE 0318296 JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS, INC O 318299 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA O 318300 JANWAY COMPANY O 318301 JOHNSON, FRANKLIN O 318302 JENKS, BRETTON O 318303 KING, JOHN W O 318304 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC O 318305 KELLY TRACTOR CO O 318306 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING 0318307 KIMBO EDUCATIONAL O 318308 KNOWLES, CYRIL O 318309 KELLER, JENAE O 318310 KECK, MARIE O 318311 KELLY, JULIE O 318312 LAMSON, MARY O 318313 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. O 318314 L B SMITH, INC O 318315 LIVE OAK ANIMAL HOSPITAL 0318316 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 0318317 LABOR FINDERS O 318318 LIBERTY MUTUAL O 318319 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC O 318320 LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO O 318321 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION O 318322 MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC, INC O 318323 MAXWELL & SON, INC O 318324 MCCOLLUM, NATHAN O 318325 MIKES GARAGE O 318326 MEGUIN, BRUCE O 318327 MONNETT EYE & SURGERY CENTER O 318328 MULLER MINTZ, P A O 318329 MCHUGH, JOHN JOSEPH JR March 5, 2002 18 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 623.10 63,523.44 11,055.80 137.00 785.58 500.00 148.00 41.04 9.01 50.60 30.00 51.89 140.00 32.00 226.25 1,352.50 931.46 992.00 11.00 50.00 76,100.63 10,552.82 450.00 21,576.76 1,225.00 79.00 500.00 1,430.28 762.10 107.82 500.00 37.32 84.00 47.32 470.00 98.67 75.69 38.62 50.61 281.25 50.61 493.18 2,168.49 10.00 434.00 1,911.52 4,830.12 69.98 4,996.78 1,500.00 7,200.00 101.95 530.95 279.00 3.00 2,119.95 5,243.03 10,800.00 • CHECK NUMBER O 318330 O 318331 O 318332 O 318333 O 318334 O 318335 O 318336 O 318337 O 318338 O 318339 O 318340 O 318341 O 318342 O 318343 O 318344 O 318345 O 318346 O 318347 O 318348 O 318349 O 318350 O 318351 O 318352 O 318353 O 318354 O 318355 O 318356 O 318357 O 318358 O 318359 O 318360 O 318361 O 318362 O 318363 O 318364 O 318365 O 318366 O 318367 O 318368 O 318369 O 318370 O 318371 O 318372 O 318373 O 318374 O 318375 O 318376 O 318377 O 318378 O 318379 O 318380 O 318381 O 318382 O 318383 O 318384 O 318385 March 5, 2002 NAME METAL CULVERTS MARTIN'S LAMAR MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE M C B COLLECTION SERVICES INC MTW ROOFING COMPANY MARC INDUSTRIES M E SHARPE, INC MEDCHECK MAYR, SHARON MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE MGB CONSTRUCTION INC MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC MEDICARE PART B MERCURI, DEBRA MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC MURPHY, DEBBIE METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES, INC MAIN STREET VERO BEACH MILHERON,CHARLES MCCREARY CORPORATION MARA, FRED L MACK, JANE N MELBOURNE SHUTTLE MEDIPLUS MCCRYSTAL, HUGH K MC MITCHELL, BUELAH MCCARTHY, LINDA NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC NORTRAX SE L.L.C. N IKE GOLF NOWLIN, TIAIRA NEIL, BETTE B N IES JR, WALTER OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE PARKS RENTAL INC PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY PORT CONSOLIDATED PENNY, REGINALD PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION PIONEER SCREEN CO INC PUBLIX PHARMACY #0385 PHELPS, PAMELA G PERSONNEL PLUS INC PING, INC PHELPS GARAGE & TOWING PROFORMA PESHA, JESSICA PC WEATHER PRODUCTS PER -SE TECHNOLOGIES-PHYS SVCS PARALEE COMPANY INC PERKINS PHARMACY 19 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 3,982.50 6,645.79 1,503.91 268.85 8.23 5,166.00 1,469.82 285.14 1,341.35 32.48 175.00 1,500.00 204.00 208.84 33.64 1,010.00 168.00 825.00 401.00 15,000.00 53.22 250.00 53.22 20.28 125.00 50.93 250.00 95.78 14.72 250.00 147.93 529.93 345.60 19.31 50.93 30.00 820.28 162.27 413.57 18.07 77.45 339.51 471.80 267.05 30.00 176.81 108.50 929.10 193.10 375.70 103.75 30.90 315.00 13,877.29 2,921.10 52.00 E ( ! 0 • CHECK NUMBER O 318386 O 318387 O 318388 O 318389 O 318390 O 318391 O 318392 O 318393 0318394 O 318395 O 318396 O 318397 O 318398 O 318399 O 318400 O 318401 O 318402 O 318403 O 318404 O 318405 O 318406 O 318407 O 318408 O 318409 O 318410 O 318411 O 318412 O 318413 O 318414 O 318415 O 318416 0318417 O 318418 O 318419 O 318420 O 318421 O 318422 O 318423 O 318424 O 318425 O 318426 O 318427 O 318428 O 318429 O 318430 O 318431 O 318432 O 318433 O 318434 O 318435 O 318436 O 318437 O 318438 O 318439 O 318440 O 318441 O 318442 O 318443 March 5, 2002 NAME PIONEER LIFE INSURANC POOLER, NORMA PUBLIX RISK MANAGEMENT RINKER MATERIALS ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC RECORDED BOOKS, LLC R & G SOD FARMS RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE ROCHA CONTROLS REXEL CONSOLIDATED REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING RIVERSIDE LEASING CO RASMUSSEN, KARA RCL DEVELOPMENT ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET ROCKWOOD CORPORATION, THE SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, S T LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC S TATE ATTORNEY COUNTY ACCOUNT STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY SEMBLER, CHARLES W SKAGGS, PAUL MD SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES S UBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL S PALDING SELIG INDUSTRIES SMITH BROS CONT EOUIP STANDARD REGISTER SUPERIOR PRINTING SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA SMITH, RICHARD STANBRIDGE, RUTH SAFETY PRODUCTS INC S UNSHINE STATE ONE CALL SOUTHERN COMPUTER SUPPLIES INC S TONE'S TRANSPORTATION SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT SUNGARD MAILING SERVICES S PHERION SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL S T JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST S EBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY S IMES CONSTRUCTION CO INC SALEH, M I MD S EYMOUR, LINDA S UNNYTECH INC- FL S TEPHENS, LARRY S EQUOIA VOTING SYSTEMS SALINA, FERNANDE SOUTHERN HEALTH SERVICES TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC TREASURE COAST BUILDERS ASSOC TREASURE COAST REFUSE TEAM EQUIPMENT, INC TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER 20 CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT 2002-02-21 27.09 2002-02-21 50.93 2002-02-21 335.00 2002-02-21 1,202.26 2002-02-21 784.50 2002-02-21 1,355.40 2002-02-21 244.82 2002-02-21 350.00 2002-02-21 148.32 2002-02-21 5,000.00 2002-02-21 158.71 2002-02-21 782.05 2002-02-21 1,228.00 2002-02-21 175.10 2002-02-21 185.39 2002-02-21 1,520.29 2002-02-21 154.20 2002-02-21 154.53 2002-02-21 313.10 2002-02-21 157.66 2002-02-21 565.00 2002-02-21 113.84 2002-02-21 30.00 2002-02-21 254.25 2002-02-21 8.00 2002-02-21 2,068.34 2002-02-21 7,528.61 2002-02-21 1,255.80 2002-02-21 925.50 2002-02-21 14.26 2002-02-21 690.18 2002-02-21 107.20 2002-02-21 947.42 2002-02-21 500.00 2002-02-21 287.76 2002-02-21 592.70 2002-02-21 1,059.37 2002-02-21 85.08 2002-02-21 135.00 2002-02-21 100.00 2002-02-21 11,602.55 2002-02-21 313.00 2002-02-21 1,737.62 2002-02-21 1,000.00 2002-02-21 21.61 2002-02-21 500.00 2002-02-21 19.50 2002-02-21 381.50 2002-02-21 148.04 2002-02-21 182.00 2002-02-21 1,751,762.70 2002-02-21 83.36 2002-02-21 372.50 2002-02-21 3,943.97 2002-02-21 13.00 2002-02-21 41,388.43 2002-02-21 74.62 2002-02-21 3,783.85 2 • CHECK NUMBER O 318444 O 318445 O 318446 O 318447 O 318448 O 318449 O 318450 O 318451 O 318452 O 318453 O 318454 O 318455 O 318456 O 318457 O 318458 O 318459 O 318460 O 318461 O 318462 O 318463 0318464 O 318465 O 318466 O 318467 O 318468 O 318469 O 318470 O 318471 O 318472 O 318473 O 318474 O 318475 O 318476 O 318477 O 318478 O 318479 O 318480 O 318481 O 318482 O 318483 O 318484 O 318485 O 318486 O 318487 O 318488 O 318489 O 318490 O 318491 O 318492 O 318493 O 318494 O 318495 O 318496 O 318497 O 318498 O 318499 O 318500 O 318501 March 5, 2002 NAME TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN TREASURE COAST REFUSE S CRIPPS TREASURE COAST TEDDIE TRUST, THE TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL TINSLEY, ROBERT MD TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRICARE REGION E/4 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP U 5 D A RURAL HOUSING SERVICE URGENT CARE WEST UNITED HEALTHCARE UNITED HEALTH CARE UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE VELDE FORD, INC VERO BEACH LINCOLN MERCURY INC VERO BEACH PRINTING INC VERO BEACH, CITY OF VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC VERO ORTHOPAEDICS VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT VERO BEARING & BOLT VICKERS, REGINALD VERO BEACH PARTNERS LTD WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY WILLHOFF, PATSY WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC W INDOW SALES & SERVICE INC WASTE MANAGEMENT WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC W W GRAINGER INC WILSON, STEVEN WASHBURN, DANIEL JOE JR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOPRD WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE WOODS, ERVIN WRIGHT, NATALIE XEROX CORPORATION ZARALLO, JANET ANGELONE, RANIERO RUDD, ALAN ROYAL, THOMAS CERRETO, KIM SUMMERALL, BELINDA K MARLIN DEVELOP & CONSTRUCTION SEA OAKS INVESTMENT LTD MORRISON, MELISSA AMERITREND HOMES HYATT, SHARON M MACKEY, TERRY PARRISH, MICHAEL MCKINLEY, TERRY & SCOTT HORAN, JOHN W NGUYEN, DUNG LOPEZ, SAMUEL 21 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 130,922.59 254.24 120.00 79.86 2,171.30 500.00 23.02 250.00 7.00 79.89 298.00 37,361.90 433.67 1,689.00 9.10 300.00 51.58 1,770.80 1,111.32 446.50 1,870.33 56.25 67.00 200.00 468.01 135.00 39.40 29.20 130.00 268.70 1,500.00 89,927.47 517.00 397.94 74.67 38.62 26.00 1,534.86 51.58 100.05 214.75 90.09 594.00 808.48 670.40 16.59 79.02 56.55 15.48 8.26 51.85 3.42 38.01 44.77 16.12 35.88 50.24 54.15 E!C r • CHECK NUMBER O 318502 O 318503 O 318504 O 318505 O 318506 O 318507 O 318508 O 318509 O 318510 O 318511 O 318512 O 318513 O 318514 O 318515 O 318516 O 318517 O 318518 0318519 O 318520 0318521 O 318522 O 318523 O 318524 O 318525 O 318526 O 318527 O 318528 O 318529 O 318530 O 318531 O 318532 O 318533 O 318534 O 318535 O 318536 O 318537 O 318538 O 318539 O 318540 O 318541 O 318542 O 318543 O 318544 O 318545 O 318546 O 318547 O 318548 O 318549 O 318550 O 318551 O 318552 O 318553 O 318554 O 318555 O 318556 O 318557 O 318558 March 5, 2002 NAME TURNER, JANE R MCALLISTER, PHILIP FOSTER, JOYCE VOLLBRACHT, KEVIN & LORI GHO VERO BEACH INC NAGY, ROBERT MGB CONSTRUCTION INC PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION E ISENMANN,KAREN V COOPER, KEVIN A BEAZER HOMES CORP KELLY, CHAD TOZZOLO BROTHERS J M AUTO SALES RIVER CLUB OF IR INC BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION CROOM CONTSTRUCTION R ZORK & SONS BUILDERS INC PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC HELMEY, JEAN HOPPE, FREDA ALLEN, AMY AMARU, PAUL AND CAROL KIM, YONG SOO CLARK, DON W WOODGATES, THOMAS P GIRACE, MARIA HENSLEY, TIM F GAY, ANDREA L MC CALL SR, DONALD E TRIPP, DONIELLE ROLLINGER,GAIL WILLIAMS, MARY L WILLIAMS JR, IVEY PECSHEGYI,TIBOR FLOODTIDE INC KNIGHT, DAVID A MOB CONSTRUCTION STEWART,DAVID HOLIDAY BUILDERS FLACH, N W MERRILL, CRAIG SANGBUSH, DON LEVITT, ROY C LEINBERGER, ROBERT POWDERLY, PATRICIA JENSEN, DIANA STONE AGE FABRICATION MCMILLAN, CECEL FRANKLIN PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION BEAZER HOMES HAMILTON, RHONDA REMINGTON RETAIL #343 HELSETH, JOSEPH AMERITREND HOMES LENOIR, WAYNE WOOLLEY, EDWIN 22 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 31.61 84.37 58.41 41.49 20.87 30.12 46.84 31.39 33.26 57.79 89.74 74.51 35.99 96.01 206.49 15.80 30.02 78.67 116.09 27.75 50.00 46.50 51.37 66.18 18.31 16.40 23.59 1.50 30.06 28.58 9.24 40.96 14.92 9.78 76.48 32.66 31.61 76.60 173.43 79.11 46.64 34.09 57.15 19.01 76.56 26.12 32.87 158.86 3.41 1.98 27.28 50.22 92.74 42.86 46.70 39.62 65.15 3 • CHECK NUMBER O 318559 O 318560 O 318561 O 318562 O 318563 O 318564 O 318565 O 318566 O 318567 O 318568 O 318569 O 318570 O 318571 O 318572 O 318573 O 318574 O 318575 O 318576 O 318577 O 318578 O 318579 O 318580 O 318581 O 318582 O 318583 O 318584 O 318585 O 318586 O 318587 O 318588 O 318589 O 318590 O 318591 O 318592 O 318593 O 318594 O 318595 O 318596 O 318597 O 318598 O 318599 O 318600 O 318601 O 318602 O 318603 O 318604 O 318605 O 318606 O 318607 O 318608 O 318609 O 318610 O 318611 O 318612 O 318613 O 318614 O 318615 O 318616 March 5, 2002 NAME TAYLOR, MARY ANN HEINE, TOM CHANNING CORP XXIX ELLERMAN, KEITH GREENFIELD, ROBERT LARSEN, HELMER MANESS, EDNA ANN LOTT, TILLMAN CUMMINGS, ORIN BALDWIN, JAMES D & JONES,MATTEW E W ILLIS, DOROTHY HUSEMAN, DENIS M S TUMPF, CLIFFORD BRIGMAN, AMY L JAMES, TIFFANY HARPER, TARA L OWLE JR, WYNN S IMPSON, KRISTIE PRESTIGE AUTO RECONDITIONING BECKERICH, GEORGE & HALL, DANIEL R WOODARD, DANIEL THERIEN, RICHARD C CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES JONES, DEBORAH WARE BERNICE STULLER, SCOTT R HORWATH, MICHAEL J KERRY, DAVID T SANTACROCE, MICHAEL OBRIEN, EUGENE J MURRAY, JAMES H RYANWOOD SQUARE SHOPPING CTR ANDERSON, FRED B IEMANN, HERMAN BROXTON, LYDIA BAXTER, JERE L BEUTTELL, PETER M S ILKEN GROUP BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY BROWN, HUBERT BABCOCK, DEAN CORR, RHODA L C P E ASSOCIATES CAPAK, GERALD T CARONE, PAUL CAPPELLUTI, RICHARD CARLUCCI, LEONARD A DOOLITTLE,JAMES A & ASSOCIATES DOVE, E WILSON DOYLE, CHERYL DEEHAN, WILLIAM F EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113) EVANS, ALFRED FOGERTY, GEORGE A 23 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 nu CHECK AMOUNT 20.76 40.34 57.34 49.86 63.90 23.12 25.54 22.69 18.10 78.32 21.27 37.24 32.22 21.95 61.35 58.09 11.41 50.56 36.44 37.61 4.07 9.27 39.17 87.23 37.07 61.51 37.62 54.98 75.67 31.63 62.88 69.90 68.48 87.37 258.00 368.00 233.00 275.00 278.00 1,219.00 228.00 176.00 1,825.68 912.00 232.00 247.00 5,784.00 413.00 372.00 379.00 392.00 2,252.00 298.00 292.00 304.00 359.00 267.00 288.00 Fin • CHECK NUMBER O 318617 O 318618 O 318619 O 318620 O 318621 O 318622 O 318623 O 318624 O 318625 O 318626 O 318627 O 318628 O 318629 O 318630 O 318631 O 318632 O 318633 O 318634 O 318635 O 318636 O 318637 O 318638 0318639 O 318640 0318641 O 318642 O 318643 O 318644 0318645 0318646 O 318647 O 318648 O 318649 O 318650 O 318651 O 318652 O 318653 0318654 O 318655 O 318656 O 318657 0318658 O 318659 O 318660 0318661 O 318662 O 318663 0318664 O 318665 O 318666 O 318667 O 318668 O 318669 0318670 O 318671 O 318672 0318673 March 5, 2002 NAME FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC FORD, ROBERT J GASKILL, ROBERT GIFFORD GROVES, LTD GRACE'S LANDING LTD HOLM, LEO HUNLEY, J MICHAEL JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES JULIN, PAUL JOHNSTON, PATTIE JACKOWSKI, MICHAEL JONES, NICKETA AND FPL JONES, ALPHONSO KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA LAWRENCE, TERRY A LANGLEY, PHILIP G LLERENA, EDWARD D LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS LAPPERT, ANN OR RONALD LEIFER, BRUCE LEWIS, CHARLES M 0 D INVESTMENTS MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM MALGERIA, PRISCILLA MCNEIL, SHAQUINA MEAD, THOMAS H OR HELEN S NORMAN, DOUGLAS OR BARBARA PALMER TRAILER PARK P IERSON, JOHN H DBA PALUMBO, LOUIS PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF PRICE, GLORIA REAGAN, WILLIE C RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST RIVER PARK PLACE ST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACH S CROGGS, BETTY DAVIS SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY SANDY PINES SHELTON, ROBERT L SANGBUSH, DONALD S TARCK, MICHAEL R STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR SUNDMAN, IVAN TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING THERIEN, RICHARD C ULISKY, WILLIAM B AND VERO FIRST CORPORATION BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN) WOODIN, RICHARD WILLIAMS, EDITH WESSENDORF, FRED WOODS OF VERO BEACH YORK, LILLY B YORK, DAVID ZANCA, LEONARD 24 CHECK DATE 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 2002-02-21 CHECK AMOUNT 373.00 380.00 282.00 7,509.00 6,245.00 431.00 445.00 2,652.00 386.00 108.00 360.00 34.00 312.00 255.00 182.00 757.00 323.00 9,325.00 307.00 445.00 245.00 1,000.00 215.00 434.00 62.00 328.00 372.00 277.00 617.00 440.00 439.67 241.00 732.00 292.00 7,371.00 2,960.00 313.00 298.00 393.67 7,534.00 336.00 375.00 387.00 281.00 391.00 325.00 307.00 114.00 1,281.00 463.00 391.00 286.00 459.00 6,048.00 249.00 408.00 590.00 3,411,117.06 121 • 7.C. Appointment of Scarlett R. Chesser to the Public Library Advisory Board to Replace Phillip Mank, Jr. - District 2 The Board noted Chairman Stanbridge's appointment of Scarlett R. Chesser as representative for District 2 of the Public Library Advisory Board as set out in the following memorandum of February 25, 2002: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: February 25, 2002 Subject: APPOINTMENT TO PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISIORY COMMITTEE From: Ruth M. Stanbridge Chairman At the Board of County Commission meeting on February 19, 2002, the Board accepted the resignation of Mr. Phillip Mank, Jr. from the Public Library Advisory Committee (PLAB) Attached please find the resume of Scarlett R. Chesser, who I would like to appoint as my representative for District 2 on PLAB Attachment — Scarlett Chesser Resume NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. 7.D. Appointment of George Lawrence to the Council of Public Officials as Representative of Indian River County Hospital District The Board noted the appointment of George Lawrence to the Council of Public Officials to represent the Indian River County Hospital District as stated in the memorandum of February 15, 2002 as follows: March 5, 2002 25 • TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Vickie Phillips DATE: February 15, 2002 S UBJECT: Appointment of George Lawrence to Council of Public Officials (COPO) E nclosed is a letter from the Indian River County Hospital District dated February 13, 2002 appointing George Lawrence as COPO's representative for 2002. N o board action is required. NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN 7.E. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Assigned to Community Health Network Committee to Replace Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 18, 2002: DA I L: February 18, 2002 TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Chair man Ruth M. Stanbridge SUBJECT: Membership - Community Health Network For several years, I have been the County's representative on the Community Health Network Committee chaired by Beverly O'Neill. Lately, conflicts in timing and an increased workload have prevented me from attending some of the monthly meetings. The health and social service needs in our community and in the state are increasing tremendously. Coordination of all the organizations and agencies involved in health and social services in Indian River County has been and continues to be the goal of the Community Health Network It is obvious that we need to work toward a comprehensive health plan that will provide the maximum of services at the lowest possible cost March 5, 2002 26 DK '7 • I would like to assign Commissioner Macht to be the new County representative to the Community Health Network. Ken is very aware of the health and social needs in the county and would be an excellent member in this continuing coordinating effort. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECOI\ DED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously agreed to Chairman Stanbridge's assignment of Commissioner Macht as the County's representative on the Community Health Network Committee. 7.F. Chase Meadows Subdivision Water Main Construction - Developer's Agreement Final Pay Request The Board reviewed a memorandum of February 13, 2002: DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED & STAFFED BY: SUBJECT: FEBRUARY 13, 2002 JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR or W ERIK OLSON, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E. INTERIM CAPITAL PROJECTS NLkNAGER CHASE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FINAL PAY REQUEST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. CDS/CCS 2037 BACKGROUND: On March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Developer's Agreement with Chase Meadows LLC to replace some 8" ACP pipe and complete an 8" water main loop tie across said developer's property located in the vicinity of e' Street and 11' Avenue (see Attachment 1 for minutes of meeting). Constriction of the water main is now complete and the Department of Utility Services has accepted the associated facilities. The developer is now requesting reimbursement for the dedicated utilities in accordance with the agreement (see attached invoice - Attachment 2). March 5, 2002 27 ER 1 •1r • ANALYSIS: The developer was previously paid $98,457.43 for 76.2% of the project. There was a reduction of $8,492.90 in the original estimated project cost (or 6.57%) due to a favorable bid and reduction in miscellaneous estimated material quantities. The adjustments reduce the developer's agreement contract amount to $120,757.10. Utilities staff is now requesting final payment in the amount of $22,299.67 to complete the County's immediate obligation to the developer. The County will still be obligated to reimburse the developer up to $9,495.00 as adjacent customers connect to a section of water main constructed across subdivision property. RECOMMENDATION: The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve payment to Chase Meadows LLC in the amount of $22,299.67 and authorize the Chaiiuian to execute same, as presented. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Minutes from March 13, 2001 BCC Meeting Attachment 2 - Ply request from Chase Meadows, LLC ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved payment to Chase Meadows LLC in the amount of $22,299.67 and authorized the Chairman to execute the requesting document, as recommended in the memorandum. INVOICE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7. G. Temporary Water Service Agreement - Joseph J. Polce, Trustee The Board reviewed a Memorandum of January 18, 2002: March 5, 2002 28 B, int • DATE: JANUARY 13, 2002 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: W. ERIK OLSON DIRECTOR OF UTILI SERVICES PREPARED JAMES D CHASTT°i_, AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS"SE .MENT PROJECTS BY: DEPARTMENT OF U ILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND JOSEPH J. POLCE (TR) BACKGROUND Joseph J. Polce (TR) has requested that a temporary service be installed from a temporary 2" inch water line on 51" Terrace to service their home at 8746 SI' Terrace, Sebastian, Florida prior to the installation of a permanent water system in Cadenhead Subdivision. ANALYSIS The Agreement states that the Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall provide a temporary water service to Joseph J. Polce (TR), until such time that a water line may be constructed in Cadenhead Subdivision, by assessment. He agrees to pay all fees required to make this connection. He further agrees to participate in the assessment, and to reconnect to this water line as required by the Indian River County Department of Utility Services. RECOMMENDATION The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Agreement with Mr. Joseph J. Polce (TR) on the Consent Agenda. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the agreement with Mr Joseph J. Polce, Trustee, dated the 1st day of July 1999, as recommended in the memorandum. March 5, 2002 AGREEMENT HAS BEEN RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY THE ORIGINAL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 29 03 1 ME 7.H. Lift Station Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation of Landfill Leachate Collection System (Bid #3009) - J & H Waterstop, Inc. and Roe Construction, Inc./AJV - Final Payment The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 18, 2002: March 5, 2002 DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2002 TO: IAA/IES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADIVLINIS BATOR THROUGH: W. ERIK OLSON, DIRECTOR Q G FROM: GENE A. RAUTH, OPERATIONS MAI\AGER A R DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT IRC BID NO. 3009 LIFT STATION REHABILITATION AND REHABILITATION OF LANDFILL LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM BACKGROUND: The Board of County Commissioners approved the 2000-2001 Fiscal Year budget, which included the rehabilitation of four Utility Lift Stations. On August 7, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement with J & H Waterstop, Inc. \ Roe Construction, Inc \ AN, to rehabilitate four lift stations for a contracted amount of $74,640. (See attached agenda item dated 07/18/01 and agreement dated 8/7/01). Additional the Board of County Commissioners approved two (2) supplemental proposals with J & H Waterstop, Inc. \ Roe Construction, Inc \ AN, to provide additional work. The additional work included: 1. Additional lift station wet -well piping upgrades of the four lift stations from cast-iron piping, to non -corroding high-density polyethylene (HDPE) piping. ($15,831.00). 2. Rehabilitation of four (4) Landfill Leachate Manholes. ($13,595.00). The total amount approved by the Board for both the list station and manhole rehabilitation is $104,066.00. ($104,066.00 = $13,595.00 + $15,831.00 + $74,640.00). ANALYSIS: The rehabilitation of four Utility Lift Stations and the additional approved work is complete. J & H Waterstop, Inc. \ Roe Construction, Inc. \ AJV has been paid $93,659.40 of the total $104,066.00. Staff is requesting Board approval of final payment and release of retainage in the amount of $10,406.60. ($104,066.00 - $93,659.40 = $10,406.60). RECOMMENDATION: The Staff of the Depa tiuent of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve final payment and release of retainage in the amount of $10,406.60 to. J & H Waterstop, Inc. \ Roe Construction, Inc. \ AJV. FUNDING SOURCE Funding will be from 471-000-169-469.00. List of Attachments: 1 Agenda Item dated 07/18/01 2. Agreement dated 08/07/01 30 • ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved final payment and release of retainage in the amount of $10,406.60 to J & H Waterstop, Inc. and Roe Construction, Inc./AJV, as recommended in the memorandum. INVOICE WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED 7.L Settlement Worker's Compensation Claim - William C. Tackett The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 15, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THRU: Joseph Baird, Assistant County Administrator \c: FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager: DATE: February 15, 2002 S UBJECT: Settlement; Workers' Compensation Claim P lease consider the following for inclusion on the March 5, 2002 Board of County Commissioners' agenda. Background In keeping with Board policy, Administrative Policy Manual 1000.1, Section 309, the Claims Review Committee consisting of James E. Chandler, County Administrator, Joseph Baird, Assistant County Administrator, Paul Bangel, County Attorney, W. Erik Olson, Director, Utility Services, and Beth Jordan, Risk Manager, met on February 15, 2002 to review the workers' compensation claims of William C. Tackett and to discuss the mediation held on February 12 2002. Mr. Tackett, a former Chemical Technician with the Solid Waste Disposal District, has left County employment and relocated in Central Florida. At the request of the County Attorney, we are not including information on his medical condition in this transmittal. Analysis Both the County and Mr. Tackett used numerous medical experts to determine the proximate cause(s) of his medical complaints and there was no agreement. With causation questionable, mediation was a viable method to resolve these complex claims. At mediation, staff agreed, subject to Claims Review Committee approval, to a $19,000.00 settlement with $15,113.99 to Mr. Tackett, $2,650.00 in attorneys' fees and $1,236.01 in costs, including all past and future medical and indemnity benefits, voluntary resignation (which has occurred) and general release. Recommendation N o Board action is required for this matter. The Claims Review Committee has authority to settle this claim, and it is being placed on the agenda as a matter of public record. FOR INFORMATION ONLY NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN. March 5, 2002 31 141 i• d '! a 1 1 cd J? • 7.J. Sheriff's Evidence Storage Addition - Chilberg Construction Co., Inc. - Change Order #1 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 25, 2002: Date: February 25, 2002 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director✓�«� Subject: Change Order # 1 Sheriff's Evidence Storage Addition/Chilberg Construction Co., Inc. BACKGROUND: Attached is a memorandum from Lynn Williams regarding Change Order # 1 in the amount of S16,280 to provide for the installation of bulletproof windows and frames. As noted, the request was originated by the Sheriffs Department and provides for a stress reduction as it is related to the 911 Dispatch area. This will increase the Contract from its present amount of $104,827 to $121,107. RECOMMENDATION: In light of the needed reasons identified for these changes, Change Order # 1 has been reviewed and recommended by the supervising architect, and staff recommends approval of Change Order # 1. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Change Order # 1 in the amount of $16,280, as recommended in the memorandum. 7.K. Bid Award #4042 - Semi Annual Bid for Bulk Salt - Morton International, Inc. The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 13,2002: March 5, 2002 ,r. 32 Lil Pr, J0 • DATE: TO: THROUGH: FROM: February 13, 2002 BOARD OF COLI\ TY COMMISSIONERS James E. Chandler, County Administrator Erik Olsen, Utilities Department Director Thomas Frame, General Services Director �r c Fran Powell, Purchasing Manage 2l� SUBJECT: Bid Award: IRC # 4042 Semi -Annual Bid for Bulk Salt Utilities Department / Wastewater Treatment Division B ACKGROUND INFORMATION B id Opening Date: Advertising Dates: B roadcast on DemandStar to: Specification Requested by: Replies: B ID TABULATION January 30, 2002 at 2:00 P.M. January 16 and 23, 2002 Two Hundred Sixteen (216) Vendors notified Five (5) Vendors One (1) Vendors B idder Morton International, Inc. (Morton Salt) Chicago, IL Description Bulk undried solar salt - course (industrial) Quantity 220 tons Unit Cost $50.40 / to RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends awarding this bid as follows: • Award to Morton International, Inc. as the sole bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. • Establish an Open End Contract for the period February 1, 2002 through July 31, 2002 with recommended vendor. Last years expenditures totaled $11,335.00. The new year bid prices reflect a 6% increase against the 2001 prices of Bid # 3039. The projected expenditures for 2002 are $12,096.00 • Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional six (6) month periods subject to satisfactory perfoImance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County. March 5, 2002 • 33 2 ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #4042 to Morton International, Inc., as the sole bidder meeting the Specifications as set forth in the invitation to bid; established an open-end contract for the period February 1, 2002 through July 31, 2002 with Morton International, Inc.; and authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional six (6) month periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County, as recommended in the memorandum. 7.L. Citrus Springs Village B (Phase I and II) and Citrus Springs Village C (Phase I and II) - Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk Improvements - The Suntree Partners The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 21, 2002: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: ak- -x William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney DATE: February 21, 2002 SUBJECT: Citrus Springs Village B and Citrus Springs Village C Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk Improvements As a condition of the issuance of a Certificate of Completion for Citrus Springs Village B and Citrus Springs Village C, the developer, The Suntree Partners, has executed a Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk Improvements for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 for each development, agreeing to install the required sidewalk (and sod) improvements within two years from the date of final plat March 5, 2002 34 r approval. The Suntree Partners has also provided a Performance Bond for each contract in the amount of 115% of the estimated cost to construct the sidewalk (and sod) improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute each Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk Improvements as enumerated below: P hase 1 P hase 2 P hase 1 P hase 2 Citrus Springs Village B Contract No. PD-00-08-13-CFCSIDE-B1 (99100114-25841) Contract No. PD-00-08-13-CFCSIDE-B2 (99100114-25841) Citrus Springs Village C Contract No. PD-01-02-08-CFCSIDE-C1 (99100114-27447) Contract No. PD-01-02-08-CFCSIDE-C2 (99100114-27447) ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute each Contract for Construction of Required Sidewalk Improvements (Citrus Springs Village B, Phase 1 and 2; Village C, Phase 1 and 2) as enumerated in the memorandum, as recommended in the memorandum. COPIES OF 4 CONTRACTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7.M. Waiver of Bid for Purchase of Replacement Dishwasher at County Jail - Complete Restaurant Equipment The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2002: March 5, 2002 35 1 0 Q • Date: To: Thru: From: Subject: February 27, 2002 The Honorable Board of County Commissioners James E. Chandler, County Administrator Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director Waiver of Bid for Purchase of Replacement Dishwasher at County Jail BACKGROUND: Attached is a memorandum from Lynn Williams regarding the replacement of a dishwasher at the county jail. As noted in Mr. Williams's memo, the dishwasher is an approved replacement within the current budget. We solicited three quotes and were able to obtain two responses. In order to place this item out for a sealed bid, we would have to develop written specifications and we would need the aid of a consultant. We received two written quotes. One was from Dough Boy Equipment Company for $34,015, and the other written quote was from Complete Restaurant Equipment for $32,394. $35,000 was budgeted and approved for the replacement. It is our opinion that no additional savings would result in attempting to secure sealed bids. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board waive its normal sealed bid requirement in this case and accept the lower of the two written quotes received for the proposed dishwasher replacement thus, awarding the replacement of the dishwasher to Complete Restaurant Equipment for $32,394. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously waived its normal sealed bid requirement in this matter and accepted the lower of the two written quotes received for the proposed dishwasher replacement, and awarded the replacement of the dishwasher to Complete Restaurant Equipment for $32,394, as recommended in the memorandum. 7.N. Schedule a Hearing Date to Consider a Proposed Change to the Countryside/Village Green Development Order (D.0.) (Blue Water Realty) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2002: March 5, 2002 36 RIC 1 c_' 37 • TO: James Chandler County Administrator DE MENT f EAD CONCURRENCE ert M. Keating, AICP Community Development D ector FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: February 27, 2002 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO SET A HEARLN G DATE TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE COC.TTRYSIDE/VILLAGE GREEN DEVELOPMENT ORDER (D.0) It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners consider the following request at its regular meeting of March 5, 2002. BACKGROUND On January 21, 2002, planning staff received allotice of Proposed Change (NOPC) from Blue Water Realty, LLC, the developer of a portion of the Countryside/Village Green DRI (Development of Regional Impact) project The NOPC is a request to change the project's development order (D.O.). B lue Water Realty's proposed change involves development of a 46.55 acre tract of the overall DRI site. That tract is allowed under the current D.O. to be developed with 120 single family units. The proposed change would allow development of 56 single family homes and 64 mobile homes resulting in a total of 120 units (no increase in units). County staff, the Treasure Coast Regional P lanning Council (TCRPC), and DCA are reviewing the request. Under F.S. 380.06, the statute which governs DRI projects like Countryside/Village Green, the county must now schedule a public hearing date at which it will consider the proposed change. The B oard must now set the public hearing date in accordance with F.S. 380.06. ANALYSIS The proposed change is minor, and will not affect the acreage, design, or number of units involved with the project The proposed change merely involves a change in unit type that is already allowed by the project site's zoning. It is staff's analysis that the proposed change will not increase project impacts. Therefore, this is considered a minor amendment to the D.O. In coordination with the applicant, staff has determined that a public hearing at the Board's regular meeting of April 2, 2002, would meet all F.S. 330.06 requirements and schedules of the applicant and staff. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that, in accordance with F.S. 380.06, the Board of County Commissioners set the public hearing date for consideration of the Countryside/Village Green Notice of Proposed Change to be its regular meeting of April 2, 2002. March 5, 2002 37 • 0 u • • ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously set a public hearing on April 2, 2002 for consideration of the Countryside/Village Green Notice of Proposed Change, as recommended in the memorandum. 7.0. Schulke, Bittle, and Stoddard, Inc. - One -Year Extension of Conditional Site Plan Approval for Gifford Church of Christ The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 15, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director 1 erector 1 FROM: Mark L. Zans''^L Senior Planner, Community Development DATE: February 15, 2002 SUBJECT: Schulke, Bittle, and Stoddard Inc, Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval For a Church to be Known as Gifford Church of Christ It is requested that the data herein presented be given fonual consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 5, 2002. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: On February 8, 2001)the Planning and Zoning Commission granted conditional major site plan approval to construct a church on a site located on the west side of 33r4 Avenue, between 46`h Street and 47th Street. The current expiration date of the site plan approval is February 8, 2002. March 5, 2002 38 u • • • Prior to that expiration date the applicant has filed a request to extend the site plan approval expiration date. According to the applicant, the delay in commencement of construction is due to financial reasons. Pursuant to site plan regulations, the extension request was reviewed by staff and may now be considered by the Board of County Commissioners. ANALYSIS: Although the LDRs have been amended since the time ofproject review and approval, the members of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that subsequent amendments as applied to the subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or redesign of the project. All TRC staff members have recently approved the applicant's request for site plan extension. As allowed under provisions of the LDRs, the applicant is requesting a full one year extension of the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the LDRs, the Board of County Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with additional conditions the requested site plan extension Staff has no objections to the Board granting the request since the previously approved site plan and corresponding approval conditions substantially conform to existing LDR requirements RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Schukle, Bittle, and Stoddard's request for a one year extension of the conditional site plan approval for the Gifford Church of Christ project, with all original approval conditions to remain in effect The new site plan approval expiration date will be February 8, 2003. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Request Letter 2. Location Map and Site Plan Graphic 3. Action Letter and List of Approval Conditions Inaivn rliv-w Ca Admin. Approved gairmfficarigi Dale Legal Budget IMICIIIEWAS P DepDept•' y&A111 t•C Rtsk M ur ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Schulke, Bittle, and Stoddard's request for a one-year extension of the conditional site plan approval for the Gifford Church of Christ project, with all original approval conditions to remain in effect, as recommended in the memorandum. March 5, 2002 39 ( raz CJ( ! t. E �J i' 7.P. Gifford Health Clinic - Letter of Authorization to Indian River Memorial Hospital District - Rezone County Property The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2002: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: 1,0( William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney DATE: February 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Gifford Health Clinic Over the last couple of months the County has been acting collaboratively with the Hospital District to quiet title to former cemetery property at 45th Street and 28th Avenue. The Hospital District proposes to relocate the Gifford Health Clinic on the north approximately 3.5 acres of that 10 -acre site To avoid delays they have asked through their attorney, Alan Polackwich, Sr., if the County, as the owner, would act as applicant and initiate the rezoning and site plan approval processes. County procedures allow rezoning and site plan changes to be initiated only by the owner of the property, or with a letter of authorization from the owner. The Hospital District would be responsible for all applicable fees going forward in the process. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County, as owner, a letter authorizing the Hospital District to file any necessary rezoning/site plan applications for the Gifford Health Clinic. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County, the owner, a letter authorizing the Hospital District to file any necessary rezoning/site plan applications for the Gifford Health Clinic, as recommended in the memorandum. March 5, 2002 COPY OF LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 40 • • 7.Q. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 10, Block 24, Vero Lake Estates, Unit 5A - MGB Construction, Inc. (Lentz) The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 21, 2002: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director AND Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P County Engineer FROM: David B. Cox, P.E., Civil nainee SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 10, Block 24, Vero Lake Estates Unit 5A REFERENCE: Project No. 2002020128-30113 CONSENT AGENDA DATE: February 21, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION S MGB Construction, Inc. has submitted a building peinrit application for a single-family residence on the subject property. The site is located in an AE special flood hazard zone base flood elevation 23.5 ft. N.G.V.D. In the attached letter from the applicant s engineer dated February 13, 2002, a waiver of the cut and fill requirements is requested The lot area is 1.07 acres. The volume of the 100 -year floodplain displaced by the proposed grading plan is estimated to be 549.7 cubic yards. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4. of the Storniwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots located in the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit. Alternative No. 1 Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4. Alternative No. 2 Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the proposed floodplain displacement. March 5, 2002 41 uti RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1. ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Ronald G. Keller, P E , dated February 13, 2002. ?. Calculations for cut and fill ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously granted the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4, as recommended in the memorandum. 7.R. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment No. 006 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2002: To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Through: Joseph A. Baird Assistant County Administrator From. Jason E Brown Budget Manager h Date: February 27, 2002 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 006 Description and Conditions The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following: 1. On February 1, 2002, the Board of Commissioners directed staff to address various building issues at County fire stations. Staff has developed a plan to make various improvements at a cost of $124,950 Additionally some Emergency Services District vehicles need to be replaced due to age and mechanical condition. The attached entry appropriates funding from Emergency Services District contingencies in the amount of $181,950. March 5, 2002 42 2. On August 14, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved the utilization of MACE Unit project generated income totaling $10,552.82. These funds were not expended during last fiscal year. Therefore, they must be rolled forward to the current year. The attached entry appropriates funding. 3. On February 12, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved an Emergency Management Performance Grant (formerly known as the State & Local Agreement) in the amount of $31,828. These funds, along with $4,259 from the Hazardous Materials Emergency Planning Agreement and $3,661 from an insurance settlement provide funding far the attached entry. 4. Staff has reached an agreement with Indian River Memorial Hospital to pay for medical care for indigent prisoners at the Indian River County Jail. The attached entry appropriates funding in the amount of $48,955 from General Fund contingencies. 5. On June 19, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved a contract with Cityscape Citing and Management, Inc. for the development of a wireless master plan and a telecommunication facilities regulation ordinance. The attached entry appropriates $48,500 from Municipal Services Taxing Unit contingencies. 6. On October 2, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved an agreement with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) for $50 000. This funding will provide for water quality Best Management Practices for Indian River citrus groves. These funds are allocated in the attached budget amendment. 7. During the Budget Workshops, the Board of Commissioners directed staff to ensure that funding was available for required travel for the Veteran's Services Department. Currently, only $300 remains in the travel budget for this department. Additional funding will be needed for recertification training in May The attached entry appropriates funding from General Fund ;..` contingencies in the amount of $1,600. 8. Indian River County has received various grants for the Vero Lake Estates Stormwater project The funding sources for this protect include a Section 319(h) grant, St. John's River Water Management Distnct (SJRWMD) cost -share grant, Florida Yards & Neighborhoods funds, Vero Lake Estates M.S.B.U. and Optional Sales Tax. As part of this project, a temporary position has been approved. Funding for this position will be provided by the Section 319(h) grant ($15,000) and SJRWMD funds ($10,000). The attached entry appropriates the funds associated with this project. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Budget Amendment No. 006, as recommended in the memorandum. March 5, 2002 March 5, 2002 Entry Number Fund/ Account dame ame Account Number Increase Decrease 1. Expenses Emergency Services District/ Fire Services/ Building Maintenance 114 120-522-034.61 $93,713 $0 Emergency Services District/ Fire Services/ Automotive 114-120-522-066.42 $38,000 $0 Emergency Building Services District/ ALS/ Maintenance 114-253-526-034.61 $31,237 $0 Emergency Services District/ ALS/ Automotive 114-253-526-066.42 $19,000 $0 Emergency Services District/ Fire Svcs./ Reserve for Contingencies 114-120-522-099.91 $0 $131,713 Emergency Services District/ ALS/ Reserve for Contingencies 114-253-526-099.91 $0 $50,237 2. Revenues Multi-Jurisdiction Trust Fund/ Project Generated Income 126-000-351-020.00 $10,553 $0 Expenses Multi-Jurisdiction Trust Fund/ Sheriff/ Law Enforcement 126-600-521-099.04 $10,553 $0 3. Revenues General Fund/ Emergency Management Performance Grant 001-000-331-023.00 $31,828 $0 General Fund/ Hazardous Materials Planning Agreement 001-000-334 292.00 $4,259 $0 General Fund/ Reimbursements 001-000-369-040.00 $3,661 $0 Expenses General Fund/ Emergency Management/ Automotive 001-208-525-066.42 $21,183 $0 General Fund/ Emergency Management/ Communications 001-208-525-066.45 $2,435 $0 General Fund/ Emergency Management/ EDP Equipment 001-208-525-066.47 $5,000 $0 General Fund/ Emergency Management/ Operating Supplies 001-208-525-035.29 $5,130 $0 General Fund/ Emergency Management/ Travel 001-208-525-039.02 $6,000 $0 4. Expenses General De•artment/ Fund/ Sheriffs Hos•ital 001-600-521-033.17 $48,955 $0 General Contin•encies Fund/ Reserve for 001-199-581-099.91 $0 $48,955 5. Expenses Municipal Plannin•/ Services Taxing Unit/ Professional Services 004-205-515-033.19 $48,500 $0 Municipal Services Reserve for Contin•encies Taxing Univ 004-199-581-099.91 $0 $48,500 March 5, 2002 Entry I Fund/ Depart, ent/ Number Accoun ame 6. I Revenues Account Number Increase Decrease General Fund/ SJRWMD - Citrus Best Management Practices Expenses General Fund/ Soil & Water Conservation/ Citrus BMP's Expenses 001-000-337-034.00 $50,000 001-118-537-088.68 $50,000 General Fund/ Veteran's Services/ Travel General Fund/ Veteran's Services/ Tuition General Fund/ Reserve for Contingencies 001-206-553-034.02 001-206-553-035.43 001-199-581-099.91 Entry Number Account Number Increase Decrease Revenues General Fund/ EPA Section 319(h) Grant 001-000-331-032.00 $15,000 General Fund/ SJRWMD Grant Vero Lake Estates M.S.B.U./ EPA Section 319(h) Grant 001-000-337-035.00 $10,000 185-000-331-032.00 Vero Lake Estates/ SJRWMD $385,000 185-000-337-035.00 $328,450 Vero Lake Estates/Cash Forward 185-000-389-040.00 $208,094 Expenses General Fund/ VLE/ Salaries General Fund/ VLE/ Social Security 001-258-537-011.19 $21,675 001-258-537-012.11 General Fund/ VLE/ Retirement General Fund/ VLE/ Worker's Comp. 001-258-537-012.12 General Fund/ VLE/ Medicare 001-258-537-012.14 001-258-537-012.17 Vero Lake Estates/ Stormwater 185-214-541-068.52 $921,544 March 5, 2002 7.S. Surplus Bridge Slabs and Piling Requested by Henry Fischer & Sons - Public Works Director Requests Authorization for Disposal of Other Similar Non -Inventory Items The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 25, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directo SUBJECT: Request for Surplus Bridr'e Slabs and Piling from Henry Fischer & Sons DATE: February 25, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Road and Bridge Division has acquired several concrete bridge slabs and pile sections, which were cut from bridge replacements and stockpiled for possible future use by the County. They range from 6-8' long. Due to the Kings Highway project being under construction, we anticipate receiving more from the five new bridges being installed. These surplus pieces of piling and slabs are not fixed assets and are not included in any county inventory. A local contractor, Henry Fischer and Sons, has requested that they be allowed to obtain approximately forty pieces of the surplus pile and slab sections for construction of an incinerator. They will pick them up and eliminate the need for the county to dispose of them. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The alternatives are: Deny the request, which would result in the Road and Bridge Division having to dispose of them at some time. Approve the request. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff has no objection to.approving the request. Occasionally, similar non -inventory items are accumulated from construction projects and permission is requested for the Public Works Director to dispose of them as needed. March 5, 2002 lee • • In response to inquiries from Commissioner Adams and Chairman Stanbridge, Public Works Director James Davis gave assurances that others would have the same opportunity to receive these unneeded/surplus bridge slabs and pilings. The receivers will sign a statement that the materials will be used and/or disposed of with the proper permitting. In response to Commissioner Macht, Director Davis responded that because of the bulk and transporting issues they were not practical to use in making artificial reefs. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved the request of Henry Fischer & Sons for surplus bridge slabs and pilings and the request of the Public Works Director to dispose of other similar surplus non -inventory items, as requested in the memorandum. 7. T. Department of Environmental Protection Grant Agreement for Development of a "Kitching Railhead Station "HistoricalInterpretive and Educational Display on the North County Regional Park Portion of the St. Sebastian River State Buffer Preserve The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator DE TMENT BEAD CONCURRENCE: obert M. Keating, AICP Community Development irector FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: February 26, 2002 March 5, 2002 Yu 0 47 -an — o j BK S 2 _!w r - Board Consideration to Approve Grant Agreement for Development of a "Kitching Railhead Station" Historical Interpretive and Educational Display on the North County Regional Park Portion of the St. Sebastian River State Buffer Preserve It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at the Board's regular meeting of March 5, 2002. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has awarded a grant of up to $150,000 to the County for construction of a historic educational display at the North County Regional Park, subject to County Commission approval of the attached State Buffer Preserve Enhancement Grant Agreement. The historic and educational display, called the Kitching Station Railhead project, is proposed to be constructed along the old Fellsmere Railroad Grade where it intersects with the entrance of the North County Regional Park on the St. Sebastian River State Buffer Preserve (see attached map). Other than in-kind County services in administrating the grant, the project as proposed will be entirely financed by the State grant. The County Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC), at its meeting of September 7, 2001, considered the proposal. Although the HRAC did not formally vote on the matter, the concept of the project was generally endorsed (see attached unapproved minutes) ANALYSIS The Grant Agreement allows up to 18 months for completion of the project from the time of execution of the Agreement. As specified in the "Project Work Plan" (Attachment A to the Agreement), the project entails: • Restoration of a section of the old Fellsmere Railroad Grade, including reconstructing a section of the railroad line; • Purchase and restoration of a steam engine representative of that used on the original railroad line; • Construction of a replica railroad depot with exhibits; • Provision of parking and landscaping (as necessary); and • Development of a trail system along a section of the railroad grade within the regional park using the railroad depot as a trailhead. As proposed, the County will hire a contractor to construct the improvements. The grant obligates the County to submit quarterly progress reports, which will be the responsibility of county staff. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Grant Agreement, and authorize the Board Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENTS 1. Map(s) showing proposed location of the Kitching Railhead Station project. 2. Copy of HRAC unapproved minutes of 09/27/01. 3. State Buffer Preserve Enhancement Grant Agreement. March 5, 2002 ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the Grant Agreement with the Department of Environmental Protection and authorized the Chairman to execute same on behalf of the County, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7. U. Proclamation Honoring the Indian River Memorial Hospital Auxiliary on its 50th Anniversary The following proclamation was entered for the record. PROCLAMATION HONORING THE INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUXILIARY ON ITS 50TH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, the Indian River Memorial Hospital Auxiliary will celebrate its 50`" Anniversary on March 11, 2002; and WHEREAS, the founding board of 12 women included the hospital's founder and first administrator, Mrs. Garnett Radin, a nurse, and it now has 600 members; and WHEREAS, the first male auxilian began service in 1961, and today approximately one third are male, and WHEREAS, since 1952 fund raising has been an important function of the Auxiliary, and as of January 31, 2002, Auxiliary gifts to the hospital totalled $2,691,394. It also supports a scholarship fund for local students; and WHEREAS, In addition to its hospital gift shop, The Pink Comer, the Auxiliary operates a thrift shop in its own building in town, and funds from the Tree of Lights provide equipment to enhance patient care for new moms and babies; and WHEREAS, the Auxiliary has 15 to 20 teenage volunteers aged 13 to 18 who serve in various departments during the school year, with 50 to 60 taking part during the summer; and WHEREAS, the members of the Auxiliary served 95,331 volunteer hours during the 2000-2001 fiscal year March 5, 2002 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners that the Board recognizes the accomplishments of the Indian River Memorial Hospital Auxiliary members, and congratulates them on the 50th Anniversary of the Auxiliary. Adopted this 5"' day of March, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 8.A. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS - GENERAL SERVICES REPORT ON OPTIONS FOR RELOCATION OF OFFICE (Moved from 11.C.) General Services Director Tom Frame reviewed his memo of February 27, 2002: To: Thru: From• February 27, 2002 The Honorable Board of County Commissioners James E. Chandler, County Administrator Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director Subject: Space for Supervisor of Elections BACKGROUND: In keeping with the request of the Supervisor of Elections and the depat Intent has sought out several sites and alternativ investigated: • Luria's Plaza (next to the Tax Collector) • Former Office Max space • Vero Beach Elks Lodge • Velde Ford Site • Temporary Modular Space • 43rd Avenue Trade Center Initially, approximately 5,500 square was sought as being the current square footage currently occupied by both the Supervisor's occupation of space with the current Administration building and the warehouse located at Road and Bridge where the touch screen voting machines are stored. In discussing this further with the Supervisor, I was advised that she would prefer an amount of space equivalent to what had been recommended by the Spillis Report for move in for 2001. In discussing this with the Supervisor, the amount deemed necessary was approximately 8,000 square feet. Also, a move in time was established as absolutely no later than July 1. your directions to seek out space solutions, es. The following scenarios have been March 5, 2002 • • Luria's Plaza was contacted since space was available immediately adjacent to the Tax Collector's office. Discussions have been held with representatives in New York with DLC Management Corporation. They have indicated that they could make the space available for move in by June 1, 2002. The up -front cost at this time would only be the reimbursement for the cost of an architect to draw plans for the needed improvements. The annual charge is likely to be $12.00 per square foot with additional charges of $2.48 per square foot for proper ty taxes and common area maintenance (CAM). This would result in an annual fee of $115,840 or monthly at $9,654. Advantages: Disadvantages: High traffic location U.S. 1; adjacency to Tax Collector; minimum build out costs (architect); fast turn around to meet Supervisor's time constraint; easy access to County Fiber Network; located within the County Seat. High monthly/annual fees or rent; longer team lease approximately 5 to 10 years. 1 he square footage cost could be reduced with some capital buy down of the build out costs. Office Max was looked at but no one from the Simon Company returned our calls. Advantages: Disadvantages: High traffic location S.R. 60; adequate space in good condition. Space much larger than needed; no certainty if developer would consider splitting the floor space down to the 8,000 being sought by Supervisor. No certainty affiauaed relative to critical move -in time; located outside the County Seat. Velde Ford was contacted but the deal was for the entire 2.9 acres. Advantages: High traffic area U.S. 1; conditions of offices seem more desirable without extensive modification. Disadvantages: Owner's representative indicated that the whole 2.9 acre site had to be rented; no immediate use identified for the remainder of site consisting of open bays in a metal building; No certainty affirmed relative to critical move -in time; located outside the County Seat. Elk's Lodge located on 26th Street east of U.S. 1 is available for lease. The building consists of an area occupied by a lounge and a large open room that has been previously used for bingo. The large open room is approximately 5,900 square feet in area. Occupancy is immediate upon completion of improvements. New restrooms would have to be built and a firewall would have to be built between the existing lounge and the area that would be occupied by the Supervisor. Owners would be willing to sell the entire building at the end of the three year lease. Advantages: Disadvantages: Close proximity to current administration facilities; cost appears to be affordable at $7.50 per square foot ($44,250 annually); plenty of off street parking; Three year lease would be available; located within the County Seat. 5,900 square feet less that that asked for by Supervisor; additional separate restrooms would have to be constructed within the leased area; a firewall would have to be constructed separating the use of the Supervisor from that of the Elk's lounge; the unknown cost or refurbishing the area along with the firewall and restroom improvements may prevent either a timely or affordable occupancy; no access to fiber optic network. Temporary Modular Space has been reviewed for consideration. Specifically, 6,272 square feet was proposed exclusive of storage. The cost of the space is $3104.23 per month or $37,251annually equivalent to $5.94 per square foot for office space. There would be one-time costs affixed to the set up March 5, 2002 51 1 • and skirting of the structure(s) at $13,820. In addition to these charges there would be the normal utility and transportation impact fees that would have to be paid for new structures. This would be the only cost if located at the Road and Bridge site with the continued use of the existing warehouse. Or, additional structures could be obtained to provide storage at a different location with the office facilities such as behind or adjacent to the Purchasing Warehouse. Advantages: Disadvantages: Close proximity to current administration facilities; cost appears to be affordable at $5.94 per square foot ($37,251 annually); three year lease available; could relocate into a new facility if one is built in the near future; delivery can be made to accommodate the Supervisor's time constraint subject obtaining a timely site plan and building permit approval; accessible to county fiber optic network. If located at the Road Bridge complex, it may not be desirable for public access such as voter registration. It could be reduced in scope and provided just for the Supervisors technicians but that could present a problem during elections especially with recounts, the canvassing board etc. Another alternative is to locate the structure along with a storage facility some where in the vicinity of the Purchasing Warehouse. That would require additional space and cost to accommodate the storage of the voting machines. The cost of the additional space would be estimated to be about 50% more resulting in a cost estimated to be at least $55,875 with an additional $13,820 in set up costs. A major issue is getting all the required regulatory approvals such as site planning approvals and permits in advance of the units to have everything in place by the time needed. The 43rd Avenue Trade Center is another viable alternative located within the boundary of the Vero Beach Airport fronting on 43rd Avenue. This is a steel type structure that is about to be built and can be available in the late April or early May time period. The initial quote was for 6,400 square feet but 8,000 square feet can be provided. The cost per square foot is $5.50 per square foot plus $L25 per square foot for common area maintenance resulting in a an over all cost of $6.75 per square foot. This is an annual cost of $54,000 per year. There is a build out allowance of $37,500. It is estimated that it would cost about $150,000 netting out at $112,500 after the allowance is deducted. Advantages: This project has already received regulatory approvals and is about to be built which provides the owner the opportunity to make the propose facility available as early as sometime in May. The annual cost of this proposed facility is extremely affordable and would be new. It is offered with a three-year lease with options which makes it easier to relocate from if a new County facility is constructed in the near future. The site has relative easy access and is on a collector type roadway; accessible to county fiber optic network. It is located within the County Seat. Disadvantages: While located within the County Seat, it is located near the approach of a runway at the Vero Beach Airport. This may be noisier than other locations and certainly would not be recommended as a long-term use for the type of location that would be needed for the Supervisor of Elections. The location may be somewhat difficult in describing for directions on behalf of the general public. The decision as to where the Supervisor is ultimately relocated is both an economic decision and one as to the degree of permanency. If there is no concern about relocating the Elections office into a new county administration building, then a more permanent facility either owned or leased may be appropriate subject to cost and proper location. RECOMMENDATION: As of the writing of this transmittal memo, staff is offering no recommendation, but due to the sort time frame identified by the Supervisor of Elections, staff is seeking comment and direction in order to foimulate a final recommendation for the Board. March 5, 2002 52 BK 1 2 ? P3 553 fi • 14 ,L • In concluding his remarks, Director Frame believed the modular units placed on County -owned property in proximity to the Administration Building would be the best economic choice. The lots purchased by the County adjacent to the Purchasing Warehouse would be ideal, but land use issues may not be able to be resolved within the short time frame. He understood the City of Vero Beach could issue a site plan approval in 6 weeks should the Board decide to purchase and place the modular units in the area by the circular drive or east parking lot at the Administration Building. Commissioner Macht advised that he was informed by Superintendent Dr Roger Deering that the Indian River County School District had a number of surplus portables that could be donated for the County's use. In response to Commissioner Adams' inquiry about the 43`d Avenue Trade Center, Director Frame cited build -out costs for that location versus the amortized cost of the modulars. Commissioner Adams remarked that all the departments are cramped but she did not want to have "trailer bodies" on the Administration Building's property. Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem stressed the importance ofhaving both storage and working space in the same location. She specified the modular units would be the least expensive solution for her office and storage to be co -located and pointed out that a location at or close to the Administration Building would also allow the proximity to other offices, particularly the Property Appraiser, for the convenience of the public. She commented on the inconvenience to the public since the Tax Collector moved out of the building. As to the cramped conditions in her office, she advised that her staff was literally having to put together pollworker manuals and clerk's bags on the floor. She believed she had mentioned this need to the Board in the past. Commissioner Ginn felt used modulars from the School Board were inappropriate. She preferred the G E modular units in proximity to the Administration Building. March 5, 2002 53 B► 1 • MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Vice Chairman Tippin, to give General Services Director Tom Frame the ability to move forward on the G. E modular space. Under discussion, Commissioner Adams expressed concerns about the looks and maintained that the County should set an example. Commissioner Ginn suggested the modulars would certainly let the community know that the space in the Administration Building was crunched. She then inquired what the City's representatives had said. Director Frame replied that he had been advised there was not a problem with the type of structure. Commissioner Adams preferred the 43`d Avenue location and suggested Director Frame get estimates for all hookups for both the modulars and those at 43`d Avenue so the Board has that information. She pointed out that this was not budgeted whatever the Board decides. Mrs. Clem stressed her need for the new election equipment to be in the same location as her office. She pointed out that the modular units Director Frame has investigated have a 130 mile per hour wind capability. She mentioned that the 43`d Avenue location is just under one of the airport runways and further she believed it would be a disservice to the public to have them travel all around the county to go to the various government offices. Vice Chairman Tippin requested the motion be amended to have Director Frame pursue in the direction of the G E modular units and that Director Frame come back to the Board with figures. He specified that no money be spent until the Board has seen the final March 5, 2002 54 BR ! rb555 • cost figures. • MOTION WAS AMENDED to have Director Frame come back to the Board with all cost figures. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the amended motion carried unanimously. 9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE NO. 2002-005 - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR 34.33 ACRES LOCATED 700 FEET EAST OF US#1, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 45TH STREET FROM RM -6 TO RM -8 - REQUESTED BY DENNIS AND OLSKA FORBES (Quasi - Judicial) PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed a Memorandum of February 15, 2002 with the aid of a color Power Point presentation displayed on the ELMO. (CLERK'S NOTE A COPY OF THE PRESENTATION IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator TN ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE obert Keating, AIC ommunitV 1 evelopment Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Runge Planning S'.( FROM: Randy Deshazo; Planner, Long -Range Planning DATE: February 15, 2002 RE: Dennis and Olska Forbes Request to Rezone 34.33 Acres from RM -6 to RM -8 (RZON 2001-12-0128) March 5, 2002 55 aA • It is requested that the following infoiniation be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 5, 2002. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This request is to rezone 34.33 acres from RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), to RM -8, Multiple-FamilyResidential District (up to 8 units/acre). The subject property, depicted in Figure 1, is located 700 feet east of US I, on the south side of 45`h Street The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site with a residential use at a density that is consistent with its comprehensive plan land use designation. On January 24, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request to rezone the subject property. Existing Land Use Pattern The subject property and adjacent properties to the north, south and east consist primarily of old citrus groves and are zoned RM -6. In addition to citrus groves, the site contains one single-family residence, two freshwater ponds in the northwest portion of the site, and several large oak trees. Southeast of the site is the RM -8 zoned Florida Club multiple -family development. Land located west of the subject property, between the site and US 1, is zoned CH, Heavy Commercial District and contains a mix of retail uses. Figure 1: Location and Zoning of the Subject Property Future Land Use Pattern The subject property and surrounding properties to the north, south and east are designated M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, on the county future land use map. The M-1 designation permits March 5, 2002 residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. Property abutting the site on the west is designated C/I, Commercial/Industrial. The C/I designation petiliits various commercial and industrial zoning districts. Environment Consisting primarily of old citrus groves, the subject property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. There may be a small amount of wetland habitat associated with the two ponds in the northwest portion of the site. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard areas. Utilities and Services The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Both wastewater collection lines and potable water distribution lines extend along US 1 to within 700 feet of the site. Potable water lines also extend along Indian River Boulevard to 45`h Street. The site is serviced by the Central Region Wastewater Treatment Plant and the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Transportation System The site is bounded on the north by 45`h Street. Classified as a collector roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map this segment of 45`h Street is a two lane road with approximately 60 feet ofpublic road right-of-way. This segment of45`h Street is programmed for expansion to 80 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020. ANALYSIS In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. Specifically, this section will include: an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. Concurrency of Public Facilities This site is located within the county urban service area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property March 5, 2002 S and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 2. Existing Zoning District: 3. Proposed Zoning District: 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Existing Zoning Districts: 5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Proposed Zoning District: Transportation 34.33 acres RM -6, Multiple -Family 6 units/acre) RM -8, Multiple -Family 8 units/acre) 205 Single -Family Units 274 Single -Family Units Residential District (up to Residential District (up to As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever is less. According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roads would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 274 single-family units on the subject property. Water With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 274 residential units, resulting in water consumption at a rate of 274 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 68,500 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property would be served by the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 536,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed rezoning. Wastewater Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 274 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 68,500 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. County wastewater service is available to the site from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 1,100,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request. Solid Waste Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year With the county s average of approximately 2 3 persons/unit, a 274 unit residential development would March 5, 2002 58 Bit �r be anticipated to house approximately 630 people (2.3 X 274). For the subject request to meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 -cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 1,241 (630 X 1.97) cubic yards/year. A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff detennmed that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the proposed zoning, district. Stounwater Manakzement All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stoimwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stounwater Management Ordinance. Any development on the subject property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of the pre -development rate. In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standard does not apply, since the property does not lie within a floodplain. On-site retention and discharge standards, however, do apply to this request. With the most intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface under the proposed zoning classification will be approximately 24 acres. The estimated nmoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design stoin, will be approximately 982 338 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the applicant will be required to retain approximately 403,161 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that the pre -development peak runoff rate is 74.089 cubic feet/second. Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level of service standards will be met by limiting off-site discharge to its pre -development peak =off rate of 74.089 cubic feet/second and requiring retention of 403,161 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property. As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process. Recreation A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The following table illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus park acreage. PARK INFORMATION LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) Project Demand (Acres) Surplus Park Acreage 2.52 1 1,164 March 5, 2002 Concurrency Summary Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has deterriiined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including stotniwater management, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies. Future Land Use Element Objective 1 Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern which reduces urban sprawl. By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with the site's land use designation, the request allows a more compact land use pattern within the urban service area and reduces the chances urban sprawl will occur. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.13 and 1.14 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.14 states that the M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area. Since the subject property is located within an area designated as M-1 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district would allow residential uses no greater than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M-1 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.13 and 1.14. Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into the urban service area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and encourage more development on the subject property and the subject property is within the urban service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2. Future Land Use Element Objective 4 Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of trips on county roads. March 5, 2002 60 BKI • • • The site is located near several of the county's largest employment centers, including the US 1 Corridor, Indian River Memorial Hospital, and Vero Beach Municipal Aiiport. Many people who work in those employment centers live in moderately -priced low to medium density housing. The RM -8 zoning district is intended for such housing. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in those areas to live near their jobs, thus reducing the length of their trips to and from work. For this reason, the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4. Consistency Summary As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Compatibility with the Surrounding Area B ecause the subject property is surrounded by either major roads, commercial uses, or other multiple -family zoning districts, compatibility is not a major concern with respect to this request. Although citrus groves currently abut the subject property, the county anticipates that those groves will eventually be converted to residential uses. Staff's position is that multiple -family residential development is appropriate for the site and that such development would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Located near several employment centers, the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for multiple - family housing generated by those employment centers. In effect, the proposed rezoning would increase the opportunity for people to live near their place of employment. Since the request is to change the site from one multiple -family district to a similar multiple -family district, granting the request would not change the basic character or type of development permitted on the subject property. Granting this request would make the subject property's zoning correspond to the property's land use designation. For these reasons, staff feels the requested zoning district would be compatible with adjacent residential development. P otential Impact on Environmental Quality B ecause the site contains no native upland habitat, the county's upland preservation requirement does not apply. County, state and federal wetland protection and mitigation regulations apply to the wetland areas in the northwest portion of the site. Those regulations apply under both the existing RM -6 district and the proposed RM -8 district. For those reasons, no adverse environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated. CONCLUSION B ased on the analysis, staff has deteiuiined that the requested zoning district is compatible with surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for medium -density multiple - family residential uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request. March 5, 2002 • 61 BK 62 RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis, the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property to RM -8 by approving the attached ordinance. ATTACHMENTS 1. Rezoning Summary 2. Rezoning Application 3. Minutes of the January 24, 2002 meeting of the Planning and Zoning commission 4. Ordinance Commissioner Ginn inquired about the two lakes on the parcel and Director Keating thought they were man-made. In response to her next question as to why the County would want to increase the density, Director Keating responded that this density was envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan so as not to have urban sprawl. Commissioner Ginn was opposed to the increase in density. Chairman Stanbridge pointed out there is heavy commercial to the west. The Chaimian opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Bruce Barkett, Attorney at 756 Beachland Blvd., advised that he was appearing on behalf of Dennis and Olska Forbes. He pointed out that 45th Street is newly paved and was paved specifically to invite development out there. He specified that the application is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, utilities are available, and the location is inside the Urban Service Area. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. March 5, 2002 62 BK I PG 363 • • ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board adopted (vote 4-1, Commissioner Ginn opposed) Ordinance No. 2002-005 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the Accompanying Zoning Map for 34.33 acres, located 700 feet east of US 1, on the south side of 45th Street, from RM -6, Multi -family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), to RM -8, Multiple -family residential District (up to 8 units/acre). ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 005 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COLTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 34.33 ACRES, LOCATED 700 FEET EAST OF US 1 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 45TH STREET, FROM RM -6 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LT TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) TO RM -8 MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT LATERAL DITCH NO. 1 AS DESCRIBED IN ORB 102, PAGE 634 OF THE PUBLIC March 5, 2002 63 I8-11, are. ld t t • ORDINANCE NO. 2002-005 RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING EAST 300 FEET OF THE NORTH 766 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26 TOWNSHIP 32, SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTAINING 34.33 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Be changed from RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (Up to 8 units/acre). All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of f Indian River County, Florida, on this 5`h day of March, 2002. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 20`h day of February, 2002, for a public hearing to be held on the 5th day of March, 2002, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht , seconded by Commissioner Adams , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Vice -Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R Macht Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Nay BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTEST B z/CrieTcc...c.el - Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: 3---/3— 0 March 5, 2002 • • ORD I DANCE NO. 2002- 005 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY G (../C /� William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANING MATTERS Robert M. Keating, AICP; C • t mmunit evelopment Director Indian River Co. Admin. Legal Budget Dept. Risk Mgr. Approved f< ra D to /34 i 9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-006 - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR 32.8 ACRES ON TWO PARCELS: 12.8 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NW CORNER OF 26TH STREET AND 66TH AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RM -6 AND 20 ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE NORTH OF 26TH STREET ON THE WEST SIDE OF 66TH AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RS -6 - REQUESTED BY CENTRAL GROVE CORPORATION AND SEMINOLE VENTURE, INC. (Quasi -Judicial) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed a Memorandum of February 20, 2002 with the aid of a color Power Point presentation displayed on the ELMO. (CLERK'S NOTE A COPY OF THE PRESENTATION HAS BEEN PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ) March 5, 2002 65 7 • T<: THROUGH: obert M. Keating, AICP; ICP; ommtrnit, Development Director Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Lo i b --Range Planning 5 Randy Deshazo; Planner, Long -Range Planning February 20, 2002 Central Grove Corporation and Seminole Venture, Inc.'s request to rezone 12.8 acres from A-1 to RM -6, and 20 acres from A-1 to RS -6 (RZON 2001-10-0181) It is requested that the following infoin,ation be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 5, 2002. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This request is to rezone two adjacent parcels containing a total of 32.8 acres. Both parcels are currently zoned A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres). As depicted in Figure 1, the request is to rezone the northern parcel to RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), and to rezone the southern parcel to RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). The northern parcel is 20 acres in size and is located a quarter mile north of 26th Street, on the west side of 66th Avenue. The southern parcel is 12.8 acres in size and is located at the northwest corner of 26th Street and 66th Avenue. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site consistent with its comprehensive plan land use designation. On January 24, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request to rezone the subject property. Existing Land Use Pattern The subject property and surrounding property on the north, east and west, with one exception, are zoned A-1 and contain citrus groves. The exception is land to the east of the northern parcel of the subject property. That land is zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre). Further west of the subject property, along 26th Street, are the -6 zoned Walker Avenue Clu Apartments and the RIVIH-8 Mobile Home Residential District (p to 8 units/acre), zoned Village Green Mobile Home Park. A vacant A-1 zoned wooded area exists at the southeast corner of 26th Street and 66th Avenue (between 26th Street and the Indian River Mall). To the south of the subject property, across 26th Street, are the Vista Plantation Condominiums zoned RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 4 units/acre). East of the Vista Plantation Condominiums, across 66th Avenue, is the CG, General Commercial District, zoned Indian River Mall March 5, 2002 ,®. %ea Ac TRIO Figure 1_ Location and Zoning of the Subject Property 33rd Street 6th Str INDIAN Future Laud Use Pattern Land along the north side of 26`s Street, including the entire subject property and land abutting the subject properly on the north, is designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, on the county future land use map. The L-2 designation penults residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. Land abutting the northern parcel of the subject property on the west is designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on the county future land use map. The L-1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. Land to the south of the subject property, along the south side of 26`h Street, is designated M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, on the county future land use map. The M-1 designation peunits residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. The Indian River Mall is designated RC, Regional Commercial, on the county future land use map The RC designation permits regional malls and associated retail shopping centers designed to serve markets beyond the county boundaries. March 5, 2002 Environment Being a citrus grove, the subject property is an altered site with no wetlands or native upland habitat. Consequently, the subject property is not defined as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does not contain any flood hazard areas. Utilities and Services The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater service is available to the site from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water service is available to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Transportation System The property's south boundary abuts 26`h Street. Classified as a collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 26`h Street is a 2 -lane paved road with approximately 60 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This segment of 26`h Street is currently programmed for expansion to 80 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020. The property's east boundary abuts 66th Avenue. Classified as a rural major collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 66th Avenue is a 2 -lane paved road with 50 to 85 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This segment of 66`h Avenue is currently programmed for expansion to four lanes and 136 feet of public road right-of-way by 2020. ANALYSIS In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. Specifically, this section will include: • an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; • an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; • an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and • • an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. Concurrency of Public Facilities This site is located within the county urban service area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste Stounwater Management and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required. Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the March 5, 2002 • concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site infoiination used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 2. Existing Zoning District: 3. Proposed Zoning District: 32.8 acres A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acres) and RM -6 Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) 4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Existing Zoning District: 5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Proposed Zoning District - Transportation 6 Single -Family Units 196 Single -Family Units As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIA. A TIA reports the number of peak hour/peak seasonipeak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips, whichever is less. According to the approved TIA, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 196 single-family units on the subject property. Water With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 196 residential units, resulting in water consumption at a rate of 196 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 49,000 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Residential development on the subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currently has a remaining capacity of approximately 3,900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed rezoning. Wastewater Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 196 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 49,000 gallons/day This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day. County wastewater service is available to the site from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 1,100,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request. March 5, 2002 69 B; 12i 0 • • Solid Waste Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The county's adopted level ofservice standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year With the county's average of approximately 2 3 persons/unit, a 196 unit residential development would be anticipated to house approximately 450 people (2.3 X 196). For the subject request to meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 886.5 (450 X 1.97) cubic yards/year. A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the proposed zoning district. Stormwater Management All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stoi uiwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stomnwater Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property does not lie within a floodplain. However both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply. With the most intense use of this site under the proposed zoning district, the maximum area of impervious surface would be approximately 19.68 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 863,065 cubic feet. In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service the applicant would be required to retain approximately 624,937 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is estimated that the pre -development peak runoff rate is 58.38 cubic feet/second. Based upon staffs analysis, the stormwater management level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and requiring retention of 624,937 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property. As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval process. Recreation A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus acreage. March 5, 2002 70 Bit 1 Park Information LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) Project Demand (Acres) Surplus Acreage Concurrency Summary Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including stoimwater management, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies. Future Land Use Element Objective 1 Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern which reduces urban sprawl. By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with the site's land use designation, the request allows a more compact land use pattern within the urban service area and reduces the chances urban sprawl will occur. For these reasons, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1. Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, land use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. In addition, Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area. Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning districts would permit residential uses no greater than the 6 units/acre pezmitted by the L-2 designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12. March 5, 2002 Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into the urban service area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and encourage more development on the subject property, and the subject property is within the urban service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2. Future Land Use Element Objective 4 Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of trips on county roads. The site is located near several employment centers, including the Vero Beach Municipal Airport, Dodgertown, and the SR 60/58th Avenue commercial/industrial node. That node is one of the county's largest employment centers. Most people who work in that node live in moderately -priced, low to medium density housing. The RM -6 zoning district is intended for such housing. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in that node to live near their job, thus reducing the length of their tnps to and from work. For this reason, the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4. Trans 1 ortation Element Ob'ective 11 and Polic 11.1 Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 state that the county will increase densities in the urbanized area and along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass transit provision. Since the proposed rezoning will increase the allowed density along and near several major transportation corridors this request implements Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 Consistency Summary As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, staff's position is that the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Compatibility with the Surrounding Area Staff's position is that the requested zoning districts are appropriate for the site and that development under those zoning districts would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Because land directly east of the northern parcel of the subject property, on the east side of 66`h Avenue, is zoned RS -3, the request is for a continuation of an existing single-family residential zoning pattern. The proposal is also for a continuation of an existing multiple -family residential zoning pattem along 26`h Street. That is because the request is also to rezone the southern parcel of the subject property to RM -6. In fact, multiple -family and mobile home zoning and development are already prominent along both sides of 26`h Street, west of 58th Avenue. Consistent with the comprehensive plan, the proposed rezoning implements an incremental transition in zoning districts and the land use intensity of theirpenuitted uses This transition is accomplished by placing multiple -family districts between single-family districts and commercial/industrial districts or major roads. Located near the SR 60/58`h Avenue commercial/industrial node (which includes the Indian River Mall), the southern parcel of the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for multiple -family housing generated by development within that node. In effect, the proposed rezoning would increase the opportunity for people to live near their place of employment. March 5, 2002 72 '.373 • • Development of the subject property would be expected to have little or no impact on the Vista Plantation Condominiums to the south. That project, zoned RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 4 units/acre), contains a vegetative buffer, golf course and ponds along its north boundary, which is 26th Street. Similarly, incompatibilities between the subject property and adjacent A-1 zoned land are not anticipated. The A-1 zoned land to the north, east and west of the subject property is within the urban service area, is designated L-2, and is expected to be eventually converted to residential uses. With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural zoning on property located within the Urban Service Area rather than changing it when the underlying land use designation changes. This not only reflects the county's policy of using agricultural zoning within the Urban Service Area as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that urbanization occurs incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods. Two factors, however, indicate that urban type zoning districts would be appropriate for this portion of the county. The first factor is the underlying designation on the future land use map. This area is within the urban service area and is deemed appropriate for residential development with densities of up to 6 units/acre. Equally important is the development pattern in that portion of the county. Located near a C/I node, a regional mall, Dodgertown and Vero Beach Municipal Airport, the site is within a fast growing corridor. Additionally, that area has convenient access to the county s transportation system. These factors indicate a trend toward continued urbanization in that portion of the county. For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RN1-6 and RS -6 zoning districts would be compatible with development in the surrounding area. P otential Impact on Environmental Quality The environmental impacts of development on the subject property are not a major concern. Being a citrus grove, the site has been altered and contains no environmentally important land, such as wetlands or sensitive uplands. For those reasons, no adverse environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated. CONCLUSION B ased on the analysis, staff has deteiinined that the requested zoning districts are compatible with surrounding areas, are consistent with the comprehensive plan, meet all concurrency criteria, will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meet all applicable rezoning criteria. Most importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for low-density single-family and multiple -family residential uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request. RECOMMENDATION B ased on the analysis conducted, the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RS -6 and RM -6 by approving the attached ordinance. ATTACHMENTS 1. Rezoning Summary 2. Rezoning Application 3. Minutes of the January 24, 2002 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission 4. Ordinance March 5, 2002 73 B • Commissioner Ginn expressed her opposition to increasing to this density; Commissioner Macht agreed especially since there is RS -3 across the street. Commissioner Adams stressed this property lies within the urban service area and although it is currently agriculture, the Comprehensive Plan envisions six units per acre and she deemed 6 -units per acre is appropriate. She asserted that everyone does not like to live on large lots, that some people like to live in more heavily populated areas. In response to Commissioner Macht's inquiries, Director Keating responded that the lots are 7,000 square feet with 70 -foot minimum frontage. Commissioner Ginn defended her stance by stating that she believes in low density, and Commissioner Macht suggested the Board consider his preference for 3 -units per acre. Commissioner Ginn responded that she could support that. Director Keating thought that while technically 6 units per acre will be allowed, he assumed it will be developed with 3-4 units per acre. Chairman Stanbridge thought it could be in the flood plain. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Bruce Barkett, Attorney representing the applicant, read a letter from Ben Bailey into the record. (LETTER IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) Then with a location map on the overhead, Mr Barkett identified the property and advised that the roads in the area had been built anticipating this growth. Mr. Bailey is being squeezed out of his use of the land for citrus. The L-2 land use was designated by the County and therefore the density being requested has been invited. According to the County's regulations, Mr. Bailey is entitled to approval ofhis application. Summing up, Mr. Barkett specified that the infrastructure is in place and the designation is in the March 5, 2002 74 81 • Comprehensive Plan. He requested the Board's approval. Hazel Gerbhardt, 6815 33`d Street, advised that her home's property borders the subject property on the north. She specified she does not criticize Mr. Bailey for his request and understood the Planning and Zoning Commission was obligated to pass on their recommendation for approval. She advised that neighbors have three concerns: water, theft and trespassing and described the reasons for those concerns. She pointed out that other citrus property would see the same growth/density and explained her concern about the area becoming a "ghost town" should all the jobs dry up. She felt there was a need for a more gentle and stable way to develop the county. Some discussion ensued as a result of Commissioner Ginn's concerns and it was pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan was changed 4 years ago and that the Metropolitan Planning Organization planned for 66th Avenue to be a 4 -lane arterial road. Staff feels approval of this application is appropriate. Commissioner Ginn suggested it was time to consider some changes to the Comprehensive Plan, adding that she was unhappy with the commercial properties on the south side of SR 60 west of Applebee's. Melissa Webster, 2525 14th Street, urged the Board to find a harmonious transition between agricultural and residential. Rusty Banack, 6075 Atlantic Blvd., specified that this development will not lead to urban sprawl and was supportive of this zoning change. Laura Adamson, 6763 66th Street, advised that she had no objection to the rezoning and thought it was appropriate use of the property. March 5, 2002 75 • I Le It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Adams recalled the subject of interface between agricultural and residential has been considered by the Agricultural Advisory Committee which brought a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners that was not accepted. It's an issue that will continue to be a thorn for some, and eventually a solution will be found. Chairman Stanbridge agreed that the interface is such an important issue now and she knew that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be looking at it for the four - county area. She thought that our advisory committee needed to get cranking so we will have a much better plan than the three counties to our south. Commissioner Ginn expressed concerns for the neighbors with tests on fruit and theft and/or vandalism, and pointed out that there is only 25 feet between the ag and the residential. Commissioner Adams believed the interface needs to be included as a site plan condition. Trespassing, theft and vandalism will never be able to be controlled no matter what is there. Chairman Stanbridge allowed Mr. Barkett an opportunity to rebut and he reminded the Board that Mr. Adair stated at the PZC meeting that he did not object to this rezoning. He also quoted Mr Hensick's statement from the PZC Minutes that he supported this application because it was lawful. ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice Chairman Tippin, the Board adopted (4-1, Commissioner Ginn opposed) Ordinance No. 2002-006 amending the Zoning Ordinance and the accompanying zoning map for 32.8 acres on March 5, 2002 76 Br( I 2 • • *232 two adjacent parcels. The southern parcel, comprised of 12.8 acres, located on the NW corner of 26th Street and 66th Avenue is to be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). The northern parcel, comprised of 20 acres, is located approximately a quarter mile north of 26th Street, on the west side of 66`h Avenue, is to be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RS -6, Single - Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 006 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDNANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 32 8 ACRES ON TWO ADJACENT PARCELS THE SOUTHERN PARCEL, COMPRISED OF 12.8 ACRES, LOCATED ON THF NORTHWEST CORNER OF 26TH STREET AND 66TH AVENUE, IS TO BE REZONED FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (LT TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES) TO RM -6, MUL.TIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) THE NORTHERN PARCEL, COMPRISED OF 20 ACRES, IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE NORTH OF 26TH STREET, ON THE WEST SIDE OF 66TH AVENUE, IS TO BE REZONED FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (LT TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES) TO RS -6, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; March 5, 2002 77 grK r.., • ORDINANCE NO. 2002-006 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: THE EAST 13.94 ACRES OF TRACT 16 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD LESS AND EXCEPT RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR 66TH AVENUE AND 26TH STREET. Be changed from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). AND TRACT 9, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST ACCORDING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE NORTH 624.00 FEET THEREOF. SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, ABANDONMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 20.02 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Be changed from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development Regulations. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 5`h day of March, 2002. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 20th day of February, 2002, for a public hearing to be held on the 5th day of March, 2002, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n , and adopted by the following vote: March 5, 2002 Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Vice -Chaim -Ian John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Kenneth R Macht Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Nay 78 BF Pu 7 9 ANCE NO. 2002-006 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Ruth M. Stanbridge, haiinian ATTEST041 Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: 3 -1 3 ©U )- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SLFFICIENCY William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Indian River Co. Approved Legal Budget Risk Mgr. f: \c d\ u\j w\rz\c e n tra l gro v e\ord. doc ROP -Cert M. Keating, AICP; Co munity I)e - elopment Director 9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-007 AMENDING CHAPTER 401, BUILDING CODES, TO ADOPT THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (Legislative) PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Building Division Director Wayne Russ reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, March 5, 2002 TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator ON EAD CONCURRENCE: FROM: Wayne H. Russ, C.B.O. Building Official DATE:Tuesday, February 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Request to amend Indian River County Code Chapter 401, Building Codes, to adopt the Florida building Code. It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 5, 2002. BACKGROUND: For years, the county, through its code of laws and ordinances, has adopted the building and mechanical codes based on the Southern Building Code Congress International Standard Building Code Series. With the passage of Florida Statute 553.70, the "Florida Building Codes Act", the State has mandated the uniform adoption, updating, amendment, interpretation, and enforcement of a single, unified state building code, to be called the Florida Building Code for the design, construction, erection, alteration, modification, repair, or demolition of public or private buildings. As structured, the proposed amendments to the County Code Chapter 401 will constitute adoption by the county of the Florida Building Code. A copy of the Florida Building Code is on file in the Board of County Commissioners office for reference. ANALYSIS: The Florida Building Code, as published by the Florida Building Commission, provides all of the necessary technical codes previously included in the county's Ordinance as Standard Codes. Subject to the provisions of the Florida Building Codes Act, responsibility for enforcement, inteLpretation, and regulation of the Florida Building Code shall be vested in the local government. According to state law, all entities authorized to enforce the Florida Building Code pursuant to s. 553.80 shall comply with the applicable standards for issuance of certificates of occupancy, minimum types of inspections, and procedures for plans review and inspections as established by the Florida Building Commission by rule. While a major purpose of the Florida Building Code is to provide statewide uniformity, local governments may adopt amendments to the administrative provisions of the Florida Building Code if: a.) They are more stringent than the minimum March 5, 2002 • standards described therein; b.) They are transmitted to the Florida Building Commission within 30 days after enactment, and; c.) They are made available to the general public in a usable format. Technical amendments, which apply solely within the jurisdiction of the local government, may be made not more than once every 6 months. No local amendments or tecniical amendments are proposed at this time. As published, the administrative provisions in the new Florida Building Code do not include certain sections necessary for the complete administration of that code. To address that issue, the Florida Building Commission has accepted a draft Model Chanter 1 dated 10/10/01 which addresses these issues of administration, and this model chapter is included as part of the Chapter 401 amendments proposed for adoption. Because the recommended Chapter 401 amendments do not address building permit fees, the current fees shall remain. The new Florida Building Code encompasses requirements for building, energy conservation, accessibility, educational and medical buildings, swimming pools, and other related activities previously found in various places in the Florida Statutes, and administered in local jurisdictions in many different ways. The emphasis on this Ordinance change is to meet the State mandate for uniform building codes and to abate the obsolete Ordinance sections. Therefore, staff recommends that the Board adopt the Florida Building Code by amending Chapter 401 as proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendments to Chapter 401 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance amending County Code Chapter 401. 2. Model Chapter 1 dated 10/10/01. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 2002-007 amending the Indian River County Code Chapter 401, Building Codes, to adopt the Florida Building Code, provide for codification, severability, and an effective date. • March 5, 2002 81 it t, in ORDINANCE NO, 2002- 007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 401, BUILDING CODES, TO ADOPT THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Florida legislature has enacted the "Florida Building Codes Act" with the intention to provide a mechanism for uniform adoption, updating amendment, interpretation, and enforcement of a single, unified statewide building code, to be called the Florida Building Code which consists of a single set of documents that apply to the design construction, erection, alteration, modification, repair, or demolition of public or private buildings, structures, or facilities in this state and to the enforcement of such requirements and which will allow the effective and reasonable protection for public safety, health, and general welfare for all the people of. Florida at the most reasonable cost to the consumer; and WHEREAS, the Florida Building Code shall be applied, administered, and enforced uniformly and consistently from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the Florida legislature has directed the Florida Building Commission to adopt by rule, the Florida Building Code; and WHEREAS, Chapter 401 of the Code of Indian River County currently adopts codes other than the Florida Building Code which pursuant to state law must be repealed or amended, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. Chapter 401. Building Codes, of the Code of Indian River County is hereby amended to read as follows: PART I. STANDARD CODES GENERALLY 1 Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in ctrikcthrough format are deletions to text. March 5, 2002 82 g ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 007 Section 401.01. Standard technical codes. Indian River County hereby adopts and incorporates the following standard technical codes as part of the Code of Indian River County, except to the extent that specific additions, deletions, or amendments are set forth in this title, eF the zoning ordinances provided however, should the State of Florida enact standards which adopt later editions -- - - _ -e the editions set forth in the Florida Statutes shall apply: Florida Building Code, as modified in Chapter 1, Administration by Building Officials Association of Florida Final Draft dated 10/10/01 Standard Housing Code (SHC), 1991 Edition. Standard Unsafe Buildings Abatement Code (SUBAC), 1985 Edition. Standard Swimming Pool Code (SSPC), 1985 Edition with 1090 revisions. National Electrical Code, 1999 Edition. Section 401.02. Repealed. Compliance with the "Florida Thermal Efficiency Code," Chapter 553, Honda Statutes, and all requirements promulgated under this Code, but not limited a as required. Section 401.03. The minimum standards for mobile homes. The minimum standards for mobile homes, house trailers, or modular homes shall be as specified in the Florida Administrative Codes and Section 320.8325 Florida Statutes. Section 401.04. Repealed. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in ctrikethrough format are deletions to text. March 5, 2002 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 007 Section 401.05. Construction and application of the technical In order to better protect and preserve the public health, welfare, and safety, whenever any provisions contained in the technical codes adopted by this chapter is in conflict or inconsistent with an application provision contained in the fire prevention code then in force in the county dealing with or pertaining to the same subject, then and in that event the more stringent provision shall apply and govern to the exclusion of the Tess stringent provision. Section 401.06. Violation of technical codes. The violation of any applicable provision of a technical code adopted by this chapter is a violation of the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County and any violator is subject to the penalties as prescribed in this Code. Sections 401.07-401.09. Reserved. PART II. AMENDMENTS TO SBC FBC Section 401.10. Repealed. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in stril are deletions to text. format March 5, 2002 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 007 Section 401.11. Repealed. Eire districts. Section 401.12. Repealed. Standpipes. {1) Section 902 shall apply only to buildings t 3) or more stories. {only) shall be provided with a Class 1 standpipe system with a minimum water supply at the hydraulically most remote hose (3) All requirements of section 902, except to the extent modified by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this section, shall apply. Section 401.13. Repealed. Hurricane requirements. to be mandatory. Section 401.14. Agricultural exemption. Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to apply to or affect buildings, structures or appurtenances located outside the corporate limits of municipalities and used solely for housing of storing agricultural animals supplies equipment or products by person, firm or corporations engaged in agriculture. The exemption shall be construed consistent with applicable state exemptions and the Florida Building Code. Sections 401.15 - 401.19. Reserved. PART III. REPEALED. AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE Section 401.20. Repealed. NatienolElcctrical Codc. (1) The provision of this Code shall apply to any electrical Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in ctrikethrough format are deletions to text. March 5, 2002 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 007 {2) All plans shall have the stamp of approval of thc electrical inspector before a construction permit is issued. {3) If an existing wiring system which does not conform to the present Code is remodeled or added to and such changes cover more than fifty (50) percent of the nonconforming cxisting system, thcn the entire system shall be reconstructed to conform to this Code. (1) A circuit of an existing system which docs not conform to this Code shall not be extended or added to until the entire circuit shall have been reconstructed to conform to this Codc Section 401.21. Repealed. Electrical maintenance. All electrical systems, wiring, materials, devices, and apparatus as now cxisting, or as her after installed, shall bc maintained in a safe condition The owner shall bc responsible for such maintenance. Section 401.22. Repealed. (1) Service masts shall bc run in galvanized rigid conduit and shall bc a minimum two inch tradc size (2) All conduit exposed to the clement; shall bc galvanized rigid conduit or schedule 80 PVC. Service entrance conductors shall be installed in conduit 43) occupancy (four (1) or more occupancies) and shall have the following inside minimum dimensions: four (4) to eight (8) meters four (1) foot demand is larger, thc mctcr room shall bc incr ascd accordingly. This meter room may be reduced in depth providing doors arc installed the . - - - _ - - .. - • - meter rooms shall be equipped with ventilated door(s) Thc meter room shall be acces.,iblc to the power company and to all occupants of thc building at all times The meter room shall bc provided with adequate ventilation. Thc purpose of thc meter room shall bc to house electrical equipment telephone equipment, and television equipment which serve the occupants of the entire building. There shall be no storage of any kind permitted in this room. (4) Service disconnecting switches must be located in a convenient and readily accessible location inside the building when a mctcr room is net required. Service disconnecting switches and other related equipment located in cnclescd or semi enclosed porchcs not exposed to thc w ather, shall bc considered as bcing located inside the Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in strik^+n,, h format are deletions to text. March 5, 2002 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 007 sewiEe- Section 401.23. Re,oea/ed. Section 401.24. Repealed. Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in are deletions to text. format March 5, 2002 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 007 (3) All electric copper wire (1) Thcc shall be no kitchen counters and no more than twe (2) receptacles per circuit at more than five (5) per circuit in dining and (5) All air conditioning compressors and air handler units shall have the scuttle hole. (7) All wiring shall be copper except (1) wiring on the line side of (8) All motors of one third (1/3) horsepower and larger shall be wired on a separate circuit Exception: Residential garage door (10) Swimming pools. The common bonding grid shall be a continuous solid copper conductor insulated, covered or bare, not smaller than No. 8. Section 401.25. Repealed. SBC, NEC, and the sign ordinance. SECTION 2. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Indian River County Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word or phrase and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; providing however, that Sections 2, 3, and 4 shall not be codified Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in ctrikethrough format are deletions to text. March 5, 2002 • ORDINANCE NO. 2002-007 SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, or any sentence, paragraph, phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, and it shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part. of State. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Secretary This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 23rd day of February 2002, for a public hearing to be held on the 5th day of March, 2002, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner GI nn seconded by Commissioner Marht and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Commissioner Fran B. Adams Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye AyP Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 5th day of March, 2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY; BY (/(1-7 .-e lia'.>(- ,L LIAM G. COLLINS EI DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY ATT Jeffrey K. Ba • • ler BYt. E/�C/'2a.cet. 0 �_ Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: I"7. Ruth M. Stanbridge, Cham tian Effective Date: This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on 1 day of March 2002, and becomes effective 3 -/ 3 -a © 0 8 Coding: Words underscored are additions to text; words in ctnkethrough format are deletions to text. CLERK'S NOTE: A COPY OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION FINALIZED 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CHANGES AS PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMLTITY AFFAIRS ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2001, AS PRINTED BY THE BUILDING DIVISION ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2002 - HAS BEEN PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD. IN ADDITION, FIVE VOLUMES OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR 1) BUILDING, 2) TEST PROTOCOLS FOR HIGH VELOCITY HURRICANE ZONES, 3) PLUMBING, 4) MECHANICAL AND 5) FUEL GAS (ALL 2001) HAVE ALSO BEEN DELIVERED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND PLACED ON THE BOOKSHELVES FOR THE RECORD AND REFERENCE. March 5, 2002 89 Lit 4,1 9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-008 DESIGNATING A WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION THAT COINCIDES WITH FIGURE 1606 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ADOPTING A BASIC WIND SPEED MAP (Legislative) PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator D v ON HE'D CONCURRENCE: obert M. Keating, ICP Community Develop nt Di ctor FROM: Wayne H. Russ, C.B.O. Building Official DATE:Tuesday, February 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Request to adopt Indian River County Wind Speed Map. It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 5, 2002. BACKGROUND: On March 1, 2002, the new Florida Building Code went into effect statewide. This new code significantly changes building regulations throughout the state. Among those changes are new requirements associated with wind loads and wind-borne debris. To ensure consistent statewide application of wind requirements, the Florida Building Code includes Figure 1606(see "Exhibit 1 Wind" attached). Although Figure 1606 establishes wind speed contours for the entire state, the new Florida Building Code states that the exact location of wind speed lines shall be established by local ordinance using recognized physical landmarks such as major roads, canals, rivers, and lake shores, wherever possible. Recently passed legislation now requires that local jurisdictions bisected or otherwise divided by a line separating wind speed zones must by January 1, 2002, enact an ordinance specifying the exact location of wind speed lines, using recognized physical landmarks such as major roads, canals, rivers, and lake shores wherever possible. As shown in Figure 1606, Indian River County is bisected by three wind contours and therefore must adopt a Wind Speed Map. March 5, 2002 90 c r • For each jurisdiction that did not adopt the required ordinance by January 1, 2002, which includes Indian River County, the Department of Community Affairs has adopted, by emergency rule under section 120.54(4), Florida Statutes, a map delineating the wind -speed lines of the jurisdiction. This map (see "Exhibit 2 Wind" attached) shall govern the location of wind speed lines under the Florida Building Code until 60 days after the effective date of the jurisdiction's ordinance. To comply with the referenced state requirements, Indian River County contracted with Kimley-Horn and Associates to provide the necessary interpretation and mappinc services to properly depict wind zone lines for the county. The result of this effort is the map shown in "Exhibit 3 Wind" attached. As depicted on that map, there are three wind speed lines which bisect or otherwise divide Indian River County (see "Exhibit 2 Wind"), producing wind speed zones as depicted in "Exhibit 3 Wind". As proposed, Exhibit 3 will constitute India River County's official Wind Speed Map. To disseminate information regarding the new Florida Building Code requirements for Wind -Borne Debris and to discuss the mapping provided by the county's contractor, the county Building Division staff held a public workshop on January 17, 2002. This workshop had an attendance in excess of fifty people from the building, design, and development community. ANALYSIS: Under the new code, designers/applicants have a choice between two methods t f determining the wind speed applicable to a project. They may choose to interpolate between the two contours on either side of the project location, or they may use the value shown on the county Wind Speed Map for t he zone in which the project is located. As depicted on "Exhibit 3 Wind", t he county has designated a single wind speed value between two contours. The proper value to use in establishing a single zone value is the value of the higher contour. Using the lower contour would yield wind loads below t he minimum value thereby possibly constituting a violation of the building code. While using the higher contour value yields loads slightly above t hat determined by interpolating, that value would not be in violation of t he building code. Although the county's proposed Wind Speed Map uses the wind speed contours depicted on Florida Building Code Figure 1606, a controversy has arisen regarding interpretation of that figure. Specifically, the controversy relates to Note 3 under Basic Wind Speed on Figure 1606. Generally, there are two ways to interpret Note 3. While Note 3 states that, "Islands and coastal areas outside the last contour shall use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area," there are different interpretations as to whether "last contour" means the last contour in the jurisdiction or the last contour on Figure 1606. Each interpretation has a different result as to the wind speeds applicable for Indian River County. The interpretation of staff and the county's wind speed consultant is that "last contour" means the last contour on Figure 1606, which is the 150 mile per hour contour located only in the southernmost part of the state. With this interpretation, Note 3 would not have any applicability to Indian River County's Wind Speed Zones. Consequently, the 130 mile per hour contour located along 82nd Avenue would be the western boundary of the 140 mile per hour wind speed zone. Within that zone, an applicant may use the 140 mile per hour wind speed or may interpolate based on the project location. March 5, 2002 • 91 1)I i An alternative interpretation is that "last contour" refers to the last contour within a jurisdiction as depicted on Figure 1606. Since the last contour on Figure 1606 in most of Indian River County is the 130 mile per hour contour located at 82nd Avenue, this interpretation would allow the area east of 82nd Avenue, where there is no 140 mile per hour contour eastward, to use the 130 mile per hour wind speed. Consequently, the wind speed for this area under this interpretation would be 130 miles per hour, compared to the staff interpretation of this being 140 miles per hour. To resolve this issue, staff has filed a Petition for Declaratory Statement with the Florida Building Commission, the only entity with the authority to make an official definition. Although this petition will not be considered for several weeks, staff recommends that the Board adopt the Wind Speed Map as proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2002- 2. A. Exhibit 1 Wind - FBC Figure 1606. B. Exhibit 2 Wind - DCA Wind Line Map Indian River County. C. Exhibit 3 Wind - Indian River County Wind Speed Map Building Division Director Wayne Kuss mtroauced his assistant "Buddy" Akins who made a presentation concerning this proposed ordinance. Deputy Building Official James "Buddy" Akins reviewed the above memorandum, comprehensively explained the evolutions of the contour maps, and gave information about the ` interim" map for Indian River County. He pointed out the wind contours and how those wind speeds could be interpolated between the contours and are allowed within the code. He explained how the Indian River County map is designed as a tool for the builder, developer; or designer to determine the basic speed for the location of his project. If the buildings are designed to the values presented on that map, they will meet the code requirement. We will accept documentation of interpolation between the contours from their engineer should they desire to use a lower wind speed. He explained in detail the lines and the controversy which has arisen because of the interpolation and the reasons why it has arisen. For these reasons, the Building Division's staff has been telling people to build March 5, 2002 92 BK P G 9 • conservatively, to at least meet the code until it becomes more clear. They have petitioned for a declaratory statement from the Florida Building Commission to explain how the three maps interpolate. The FBC meets monthly and is scheduled to meet March 25`h and 26`h in Orlando. At this stage, with the advice of Kimley Horn, our consultant, the Building Division is recommending a certain map as the wind speed map for Indian River County and the map only covers the land which is within the jurisdiction of the County. There was a brief discussion about how the lines were determined and Mr Akins explained that there was an attempt to follow natural barriers since the DCA lines were not available when the consultant for the County was hired. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Tim Zorc, 610 Bridgewater Lane SW, advised he was representing the Treasure Coast Builders Association, Indian River Chapter. He had just returned from Tallahassee and seen what other counties have been doing with this issue. He specified he has a high level of confidence in the map and the research done by Indian River County. He thought there was some questionable information in bordering counties that has created some questions. The State will come in to make a determination but only by request. He felt confidence that this could be moved through the first reading but asked to reserve the right, if the Building Commission comes up with something different from what we have adopted, to revisit it and update it with the revised data. At this time, however, the Building Commission has a have multitude of issues before them and a determination by them may take a while. Another item mentioned in Tallahassee is how the insurance companies determine premiums, which is currently based on flood zones and elevations. There is concern that the insurance companies may determine their premiums based on the way a March 5, 2002 93 UR !9 • local wind zone map is adopted. Community Development Director Robert Keating pointed out that this ordinance will not require a second reading before adoption. We maintain our map is correct. Right now, staff is accepting applications and needs to know what wind speed to apply until a final decision comes from the Florida Building Commission. Staff is committed to corning back with a change if the FBC decides our map is incorrect. A brief discussion was held regarding insurance premium reductions based on the code. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public hearing. In response to Commissioner Adams' inquiry as to whether the Board could change the zones, Director Keating specified that generally the maps provided by the State show the contour lines and the discretion given to local government is to set the final contour lines along natural features so that it is easy to administer. They are restricted from moving them too much, particularly to lessen the applicable wind speed. Mr. Russ added that the emergency rule in place mandates using the map from the Department of Community Affairs which has used the geographical boundaries. In addition, he described how delay has led to the confusion in the maps to the public, to the builders, and to the local jurisdictions. Kimley Horn and our staff has great confidence in our interpretation of the contours on our map. He recently learned that Brevard County is implementing and interpreting the maps the way we have, but St. Lucie County may have problems. In response to County Attorney Paul Bangel, Mr. Russ explained that because Fellsmere is not in a bisect area and lies very clearly in one zone, they technically did not March 5, 2002 94 BR • • have to go through the mapping process. Director Keating added that this map is designed to affect only the unincorporated county and the City of Vero Beach. ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 2002-008 designating a wind borne debris region that coincides with Figure 1606 of the Florida Building Code and adopting a basic wind speed map; providing for codification; providing for severability; and providing for an effective date. ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING A WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION THAT COINCIDES WITH FIGURE 1606 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ADOPTING A BASIC WIND SPEED MAP; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; A_\D PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Florida Building Code, Section 1606.1.6 requires that the exact location of wind speed lines shall be established by local ordinance using recognized physical landmarks such as major roads, canals, rivers and lake shores, wherever possible ; and WHEREAS, Indian River County in consultation with a consulting professional engineer has developed the Indian River County wind speed map which identifies wind speed contours by reference to major roads, canals, etc.; and WHEREAS, Indian River County's wind speed map implements Figure 1606 of the Florida Building Code which depicts State of Florida Wind Borne Debris Region and Basic Wind Speeds, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. ADOPTION. Section 401.07 of the Code of Indian River County is hereby created and adopted to read as follows: March 5, 2002 95 BIC 0 i n n i... � f Section 401.07. The Indian River County Wind Borne Debris Region and Basic Wind Speed Map. Indian River County hereby adopts and establishes the geographic boundary of the wind borne debris regions in Indian River County as set out in the attached Exhibit A "Indian River County Wind Speed Map". This wind borne debris region coincides with Figure 1606 of the Florida Building Code and has a basic wind speed of 120 miles per hour or greater. Wind borne debris requirements of the Florida Building Code apply in the region seaward of the 120 miles per hour map contour lines. SECTION 2. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Indian River County Code and the word `ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word or phrase and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; providing however, that Sections 2, 3, and 4 shall not be codified SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, or any sentence, paragraph, phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance, and it shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part. of State. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Secretary This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 23rd day of February 2002, for a public hearing to be held on the 5th day of March, 2002, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht seconded by Commissioner Gi nn , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 5th day of March, 2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION 0 g BY WILLIAM G. COLLINS it DEPUTY COUNTY ATTCR"NE'( ATT Jeffrey K Ba Jerk B V4;riM t j, Deputy Clerk / INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By. /'L. Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairinan Effective Date: This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on ' 3 - day of March 2002, and becomes effective 3- /3 -a Oo March 5, 2002 96 i7 March 5, 2002 THE CHAIRMAN CALLED A SHORT RECESS AT 10:50 AM AND RECONVENED THE MEETING AT 10:55 AM. WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF PRESENT. 9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM BRIAN HEADY TO "ADDRESS THE COUNTY COMMISSION ON ISSUES THAT RELATE TO THE POWER OF THE GAVEL" AND OTHER VARIOUS ISSUES The Board reviewed a letter of February 25, 2002: Brian T. Heady 406 19th Street Vero Beach, F1 32960 February 25, 2002 Chairman, County Commission Margaret Gunter Indian River County Commission Vero Beach Florida 32960 fes„ !ti FEB 2002 �vliagainniaits w ze CIRCE v 4?9�o� 4 r 11 Dear County Commission Commissioners: Please place ane on the citizen input public discussion portion of your agenda for the next meeting. I would appreciate tirne to address the County Commission on issues that relate to the power of the gavel. This relates to the tax burden of Indian River County residents. 1 would also request time to speak to issues that relate to answers and duties under the Florida Constitution. If you wish 1 could also discuss ways to reduce the time necessary to speak to issues before the Commission. If you have any questions 1 can be reached by telephone at 778-1028. Sincerely Brian Heady r y March 5, 2002 98 nv �,t Loa • • Chairman Stanbridge called on Mr. Heady and advised him that he had three minutes. Brian Heady asked the Chairman when she starting imposing the 3 -minute limit and argued with her when she advised that the rule has been in effect and today's agenda was particularly long. He criticized the "person with the gavel" of several faults including acting like "a little tyrant" and ignoring persons who desired to speak particularly during the matter concerning the space for the Supervisor of Elections. Commissioner Macht objected to Mr. Heady's personal attacks. Mr. Heady also claimed that the excess space rented to the School District during the discussion of the space for Elections was totally ignored. He submitted that if they did not rent out that space, they would have "more than adequate square footage available for the constitutional officers without spending a ton of taxpayer money." He claimed the "power of the gavel" refuses to allow citizens adequate input and imposes other restrictions. He regarded elected officials who ignore important principles which serve as the framework of this county as "traitors to the revolution" and to the principles that make our country great. 9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM GEORGE RACICOT TO DISCUSS "CODE ENFORCEMENT'S FAILURE TO ACT ON COMPLAINTS" (MOBILE HOME TIE DOWNS) The Board reviewed a letter of February 18, 2002: March 5, 2002 99 N s • fiJi// 1/2 r, /O i?c Co /77n7irsi&ncrr and poAb/ic 4 %-2//Gn, 74/7CUc e CoEh orc��r�,� Tai /u/ee ,9 c f o C o }-77 /,9 i h yt', J d a Conip /Q;In/ e-v1fh /nr, , 7Arn c c 1'I 11^ , /Qc,vens r� a rd 'n� 'no/ /% A0rne �i C1oconf / fly /of,/J of�/ /of -7`1/2c C (�U w of �iJe r � S'.�/`ci-/ NCJ�J 9 �iovc or°unoil 3 —• y , h,a4Ph cu ire do Ay�ti� ±h s arearecc, r/c/ `tic tAcir //'///c Ca I'S oh -the Co n C rr / c cr/4 % , /Y] r kc /Aet, / r (-0 tAci, I /e 7 o 9 h �el f �h Qty, Yr, n f 0 nr�au� J // 00LunS Crte Shocuc_c7 -thh0fo �o± the Ch/ �a/s CQ F� hcc r• �%9 f do cans / ALf its of7 c c x 4 rn p /e of Lc/ h C !- // cviacel drerf a/ / .e�A%L Uj , March 5, 2002 • • George Racicot, 1455 90th Avenue, advised that nothing has been done since he came before the Board the last time. He had met with Building Division Director Wayne Russ, Community Development Director Robert Keating, and Administrator Chandler and they were to let him know what they found after their investigation but there has been no meeting. He believed that the complaints he has turned in are hazardous and deadly, but to date there has been no action taken. The Inspector went out and relied on the word of the maintenance superintendent in Heron Cay. He enumerated several violations. He presented a scenario of children because he was concerned about ungrounded, loose electrical face plates and kids playing nearby in water. He stressed that maintenance needs to be done to these electrical outlets. Chairman Stanbridge thanked him and invited him to call her with future complaints and they will get with building inspectors to see if we can come to some conclusions. 9.C.1-5 PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 12, 2002: Sun -Up of Indian River, Inc. 's request for special exception use approval for an adult congregate living facility and for an adult day- care facility (South of Salvation Army facility at 5th Street SW - 27th Avenue SW intersection) (Quasi -Judicial) Tri -Partners, L.L.C. 's request for special exception use approval for a self-service storage facility at 445 27th Avenue SW (western half of the property) (Quasi -Judicial) March 5, 2002 101 Bid McNab and McNab "V" Inc. 's request to rezone approximately 2.32 acres from CL to PD Commercial and request conceptual PD approval for a restaurant with a drive-through lane (Sonny's BBQ) (Legislative) Option Agreement for sale and purchase of the Louis Simonye Parcel addition of the North Sebastian Conservation Area (Legislative) Consideration of and adoption of proposed revisions to the County Tree Protection and Land Clearing Ordinance (continuation rom Januar 22 2002 ublic hearin Le • islative Chairman Stanbridge read into the record the meeting notices in a Memorandum of February 26, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator DE N' MENT HEAD COI\CURRENCE: obert M. Keating, A CP; Co unity D,e'y'lopment Director /�. 6 THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Planning Director FROM: Peter J. Radke; Senior Planner DATE: February 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearings for Upcoming Board Meeting It is requested that the data herein presented be given foiinal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 5, 2002. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration, as follows: March 5, 2002 102 BK IFon 3 • • March 12, 2002 Meeting 1. Sun -Up of Indian River, Inc.'s request for special exception use approval for an adult congregate living facility and for an adult day-care facility. The subject site is located on the south side of 5th Street SW, east of the 5th Street SW/27th Avenue SW intersection and the Salvation Army facility. (Quasi -Judicial) 2. Tri -Partners, L.L.C.'s request for special exception use approval for a self-service storage facility. The subject property is located at 445 27" Avenue SW, just north of the 5' Street SW/27" Avenue SW intersection. The area of development will encompass the western half of the subject property. (Quasi -Judicial) 3. McNab and McNab "V" Inc.'s request to rezone approximately 2.32 acres from CL to PD Commercial and request conceptual PD approval for a restaurant with a drive-through lane (Sonny' BBQ). (Legislative) 4. Board of County Commissioners' consideration to approve an option agreement for sale and purchase of the Louis Simonye Parcel addition of the North Sebastian Conservation Area. (Legislative) 5. Board of County Commissioners' consideration of and adoption of proposed revisions to the County Tree Protection and Land Cleanng Ordinance (continuation from January 22, 2002 public hearing).(Legislative) RECOMMENDATION: The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board's infounation. No action is needed. Commissioner Ginn wondered if it would be possible to change the Tree Ordinance to March 19' because of the heavy agenda and other reasons. County Attorney Paul Bangel recalled that the Board had previously opened that public hearing and continued it to a date and time certain. Community Development Director Robert Keating assumed it could be opened and again continued to a time certain. Staff has conducted several workshop meetings and has been announcing the date. Also, on the 19`", the first of two required hearings on the Telecommunications Ordinance will be held. Commissioner Ginn lamented about so much reading and her desire to study all of it and indicated her space needs information will have to be put off. March 5, 2002 103 BK I o , `�}.a-::Ki'R'Na#��.'•�� re vh3µ 4rt.3P FYk�r+ fs. Chairman Stanbridge pointed out that several time-consuming matters are coming forward. 10.A. CONSULTING SERVICES WITH THE CONSERVATION FUND CHARITABLE TRUST FOR THE PURCHASE OF LOST TREE ISLANDS - CITY OF VERO BEACH - TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES - FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST Assistant Administrator Baird reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2002: TO: Board of County Commissioners fin FROM: Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator t"�" DATE: February 27, 2002 SUBJECT: Consulting Services with The Conservation Fund Charitable Trust for the Purchase of Lost Tree Staff has been working diligently to purchase the Lost Tree Island. Recently, Indian River County has been approached by The Conservation Fund Charitable Trust to assist in the acquisition of the Lost Tree Islands. The Conservation Fund has proposed a consultation fee in the amount of $75,000 including expenses. Payment of the consulting fee is contingent on closing of the property. The Conservation Fund has extensive resources, knowledge, and expertise in the purchase of conservation land. Staff feels they could be helpful in obtaining the Lost Tree Islands. Recommendation: Staff recommends approving the Letter of Agreement. March 5, 2002 • Mr. Baird pointed out that the consultant would not receive any payment should the transaction with Lost Tree Islands not close. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the Letter of Agreement with The Conservation Fund Charitable Trust and a consulting fee of $75,000 including expenses, as recommended in the memorandum. LETTER OF AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.A. APPROVAL OF FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST (FCT) CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AGREEMENT FOR COST -SHARE ACQUISITION OF THE LOST TREE ISLANDS - CITY OF VERO BEACH - TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: • • obert M. Keating, AICP Community Development rector FROM: Roland M. DeB1oi , CP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: February 26, 2002 RE• Approval of Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Conceptual Approval Agreement for Cost -Share Acquisition of the Lost Tree Islands It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at the Board's regular meeting of March 5, 2002. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In November 2001, Indian River County, in partnership with the City of Vero Beach and the Town of Indian River Shores, was awarded a Florida Communities Trust (FCT) cost -share grant for purchase of the Lost Tree Islands. Since November, FCT staff has visited the Lost Tree Islands project site with county staff to verify March 5, 2002 105 U 3 • • 6646 site conditions as represented in the project application. The County is also in the process ofobtaining two independent appraisals of the islands. In accordance with State procedures, the next step is for the FCT Goveming Body and the County, City and Town to execute a "Conceptual Approval Agreement" (CAA) for the cost -share funding project. Attached is the CAA for the Board's approval consideration. ANALYSIS The CAA consists of standard language and conditions pursuant to Rule 9K 4, Florida Administrative Code, which is the rule that sets forth FCT program procedures. Since the Board, at its meeting of February 5, 2002, opted to take a "pre-acquisition" approach to purchasing the Lost Tree Islands, the CAA is structured as a reimbursement grant. In accordance with FCT requirements, the acquisition can be considered a 'pre- acquisition" if the project is purchased within 18 months of the grant approval (i.e., on or before February 13, 2003). The Agreement consists of ten main sections, as follows: I General Conditions u Audit Requirements Iu Affirmations, Annual Stewardship Report, Authorized Executor and Federal Identification Number IV. Management Plan Approval V. Project Plan Approval VI. Project Site Acquisition Requirements Imposed by Chapter 259 and Chapter 380, Part III, F.S. 'VII. VIII Obligations of the FCT Recipient as a Condition of Project Funding Obligations of the Recipient Relating to the Use of Bond Proceeds IX. Disallowable Activities/Remedies Y. Conditions Particular to the Project Site Plan that Must be Addressed in the Management Plan The General Conditions section of the agreements contains standard language pertaining to timing and coordination of steps between the County and FCT, and among other things identifies the key contact from the County for purposes of coordinating project activities. The Audit Requirements section specifies audit requirements under Section 215.97, F.S., the Florida Single Audit Act. Affirmations, Annual Stewardship Report, Authorized Executor and Federal Identification Number: this section identifies the representatives of the County, City and Town authorized to execute documents associated with the project. (Consistent with past FCT projects, the Board Chairman is proposed as the County's representative, subject to full Board authonzation). This section also specifies the F(.21 requirement of an annual stewardship report to be provided by the County The Management Plan Approval section outlines required elements of a conceptual management plan that must be completed prior to FCT funding reimbursement. Project Plan Approval outlines County documents required prior to FCT disbursement of State funds, including a statement of total project costs, a signed agreement for acquisition, a certified survey, title insurance and an environmental assessment. Project Site Acquisition Requirements Imposed by Chapter 259 and Chapter 380, Part III, F.S. specifies that the local recipient (the County) will have title to the project, and that State will have a reversionary interest. A Grant Award Agreement, which spells out conditions of the grant award, is required to be recorded upon closing with the FCT for cost -share funding reimbursement. Obligations of the FCT Recipient as a Condition of Project Funding ensures that any use of project property once acquired will be consistent with the adopted management plan, or, if changes are proposed, that FCT approval is first obtained. March 5, 2002 106 70] Obligations of the Recipient Relating to the Use of Bond Proceeds requires the County to notify FCT if any use of project property is proposed that may affect State bond proceeds used in acquiring the property, with respect to legal and tax consequences. This section also outlines disallowable activities. "Disallowable activities" are specifically listed and include the operation of concessions on the property, and "any use of the project site by any person other than in such person's capacity as a member of the general public." Disallowable Activities/Remedies provides that the County will cease any disallowable activities on the project property upon written notification from the FL 1, as applicable, and that the FCT will be held harmless from all claims relating to disallowable activities. This section also provides that the FCT has the right to seek an injunction against the County for any disallowable activities. Conditions Particular to the Project Site Plan that Must be Addressed in the Management Plan reflects information presented to FCT in the grant application, including revisions deemed appropriate by the FCT, relating to proposed site improvements and use. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Conceptual Approval Agreement, and authorize the Board Chan man to sign the Agreement. Staff also recommends that the Board authorize staff to coordinate with the City and the Town for approval of the Agreement. ATTAC [ENTS 1. Conceptual Approval Agreement ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the proposed Conceptual Approval Agreement, authorized the Chairman to execute the Agreement, and authorized staff to coordinate with the City of Vero Beach and the Town of Indian River Shores for approval of the Agreement, as recommended in the memorandum. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.C. SPACE FOR SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS Moved to 8. March 5, 2002 11.G.1. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN - WOODS HOLE GROUP, INC. - WORK ORDER NO. 2 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 25, 2002: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Direct. SUBJECT: Woods Hole Group, Inc. Work Order No. 2 DATE: February 25, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Woods Hole Group, Inc. Has a Professional Services Agreement with the County to provide miscellaneous coastal engineering services on an as -needed basis. This Work Order No. 2, in the amount of $18,900.00, provides for 90 additional hours of consultation services and the preparation of an update of shoreline erosion trends for the Beach Preservation Plan, last updated in 1998. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends the approval of Work Order No. 2 to the Agreement with Woods Hole Group, Inc Funding to be from Account # 128-144-572-033-19. ATTACHMENT Work Order No. 2 MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by Vice Chairman Tippin, to approve staffs recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Adams understood that Woods Hole has been doing this on an "as needed" basis but she thought the figure was excessive. She requested that March 5, 2002 the next time this needs to be done that it go out to bid so perhaps a better price can be obtained. Environmental Analyst Jonathan C. Gorham, Ph.D. explained that the County has been taking advantage of Jeff Tabar's (former employee) familiarity with a lot of these issues for on-going consulting services. Since he contributed to the last Beach Preservation Plan update and is familiar with the zones, it was felt that in this instance we needed to get this update done in order to respond to calls of people wanting information on erosion rates. We have the data, but we need to have it analyzed. Commissioner Adams asked whether a model was available to analyze the data, and Mr. Gorham responded that the survey data can provide a big picture of volume change, but this is more involved than what the surveyor contractors are able to do. Commissioner Adams indicated she would approve this request, but wanted it to go out to bid the next time. Commissioner Ginn believed the department is in need of another staff person, and Administrator Chandler specified that the County has advertised many times for the position but has received no applications in spite of other recruiting efforts. They are now considering the need to use more outside consultants. We are in a major program now, really need a coastal engineer, and feel we cannot wait any longer. Both Commissioner Adams and Commissioner Ginn credited Mr Gorham with a great job. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. (Approved Work Order No. 2 to the agreement with Woods Hole Group, Inc., as recommended in the memorandum.) March 5, 2002 WORK ORDER NO. 2 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.2. VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATERIMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I, C.E.M. ENTERPRISES, INC. - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 25, 2002: TO: James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: W. Keith McCully, P.E., Esq., Stormwater Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 FOR VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I DATE: February 25, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On November 20, 2001, the County Commission executed a construction contract with C. E. M. Enterprises Inc of Apopka, Florida, to construct Phase I stormwater improvements to the Vero Lake Estates subdivision. We now ask the Commission to approve Change Order No. 3 which includes adding approximately two acres of sod to the project to control erosion and adding 80 L.F. of48-inch diameter concrete pipe. Change Order No. 3 increases the project cost by $170,469.31. The revised Contract Price will be $1,515,902.75. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to approve and sign Change Order No. 3, with C.E.M. Enterprises, Inc. FUNDING 1. Indian River County's share of the funding will come from Account No. 315-214-541- 068.52. 2. The remainder of the funding will come from Account No. 185-214-541-068.52. Funding will come from the following sources: a. 319(h) Grant = $400,000 b. Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit = $250,000 c. Indian River County Local Option Sales Tax = $577,452 75 d. Indian River Lagoon Program = $250 000 e. St. Johns River Water Management District Cost -Share Grant = $30,000 f. Florida Yards & Neighborhoods — IFAS = $8,450 ATTACHMENTS 1. Two copies of Change Order No. 3 March 5, 2002 MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by Vice Chaiinlan Tippin, to approve staff's recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Macht wondered about the cost of the sod and pipe which seemed to be very high. Public Works Director James Davis advised that it is a very large subdivision and a very large earth -moving project. There is more than a mile of open canal. (CLERK'S NOTE Later in the meeting, Director Davis clarified that the measure for the sod area is 17 square yards ) THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion carried unanimously. (Approved Change Order No. 3 with C E M. Enterprises, Inc. and authorized the Chairman to execute same) CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.3. BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - DIAL CORDY AND ASSOCIATES - CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 25, 2002: March 5, 2002 TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM. Jonathan C. Gorham, Ph.D. Environmental Analyst '3V - SUBJECT: Dial Cordy and Associates Contract Amendment No.2 DATE: February 25, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Dial Cordy and Associates is currently under contract with the county for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment, required for Federal permitting under the National Environmental Policy Act, for the Sectors 1&2 beach renourishment project. On February 20, 2002, a project coordination meeting was held with the Federal permitting agencies to discuss the Environmental Assessment. At this meeting, the agencies indicated ed at they offshore uldrorequirew area to underwater video survey of the propbe present that would have been determine if any seagrass may missed by the side scan sonar survey conducted in 2000 to survey for rock outcroppings. The attached Contract Amendment in the amount of $8,400.00 reflects the scope of services and costs to complete this task. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends the approval of Contract Amencment No. 2 to the contract with Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc. Funding is from the Beach Preservation Fund 128-144-572. This project is eligible for 75% cost sharing by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under DEP Contract No. 98IR1. ATTACHMENT Contract Amendment No. 2 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Contract Amendment No. 2 to the contract with Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc., with funding as set out in the memorandum, as recommended in the memorandum. AMENDMENT NO. 2 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD March 5, 2002 11.G.4. JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - AMENDMENT NO. 1 - REVISED RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT - U. S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 18, 2002: James Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director C AND Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Enginee() FROM: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Michelle A. Gentile, C.E.T., Civil Engineer Acceptance of Revised Amendment 1 from US Fish and Wildlife Service Public Improvements to Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge IRC Project No. 9724 DATE: February 18, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In 1994, Indian River County's Jungle Trail enhancement project application was approved by FDOT. Funded at approximately $3.2 million, the project involved various improvements to Jungle Trail. During the program development and preliminary design phase of the Jungle Trail project, it was determined that the project could not be undertaken as initially proposed. Consequently, the Jungle Trail project was significantly downsized, and unneeded Jungle Trail funds were allocated to other enhancement projects in the County. As revised, the Jungle Trail enhancement project now involves construction of parking lots, restrooms, and related improvements on three sites along Jungle Trail. Two of these sites are located in the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge and owned by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). On February 2, 1999 the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners accepted the USFWS easements for the enhancement project within the Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge. The easement will document that the County, as the enhancement applicant, will have control on the enhancement - funded improvements for the life of the improvements. As of this time, revised easement document has been prepared and executed by USFWS. This revision is necessary due to the proposed design It is now necessary for the Board of County Commissioners to formally accept the easement. A\ AL YS IS The design of the two sites owned determined that the one site known the area in the proposed design. March 5, 2002 by the USFWS is complete. During the design phase, it was as the Kennedy Site, easement had to be revised to encompass The attached easement documentation identifies the constniction project limits for the Kenredy Site. This revised easement has been executed by the USFWS in Atlanta, Georgia. As structured, the easement agreement contains 18 conditions as outlined in the original document. Although extensive in number and detail, the conditions are not inconsistent with the proposed enhancement project. In fact, many of the conditions will apply to the USFWS itself, since Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge staff (USFWS staff) will be responsible for maintenance of the improvements after construction. For the jungle Trail enhancement project to proceed, the Board of County Commissioners must formally accept the easement from USFWS. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners accept the USFWS revised easement for the enhancement project site within the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge. ATTACHMENTS 1. Amendment #1 2. Copy of Terms and Conditions ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously accepted the USFWS revised easement for the enhancement project site within the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, as recommended in the memorandum. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT AMENDMENT 1 WILL BE RECORDED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COPY OF DOCUMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 11.G.5. EMERGENCY PURCHASE ORDER REPAIR OF THE 65TH STREET BRIDGE (SOUTH WINTER BEACH ROAD OVER LATERAL "H" CANAL) - KNIGHT AND MATHIS - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN 2006 The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2002: March 5, 2002 114 BK 12!P;715 xt0 FCS:fre TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: February 27, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The 65`'' Street Bridge over Lateral "H" canal has excessive corrosion of the steel piles supporting the bridge. A recent inspection revealed that immediate repair is needed. This bridge was repaired in 1986 by Knight & Mathis, Inc., a local steel fabrication company. To repair ten bridge piles, a proposal in the amount of $13,365.60 has been received from Knight and Mathis The FDOT Bridge engineer, Jorge Martos, has indicated that the DOT will fund replacing the bridge in 2006, if the County completes the repair. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS To bid this project will require a delay of six weeks. The bridge is currently weight restricted to 5 tons, which prohibits emergency vehicles from traversing 65"' Street. The only alternative is to issue a retroactive approval of the emergency purchase order to Knight and Mathis in the amount $13,365.60. A $2,875 advance is required. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends Alternative NO. 1. Funding from 111-214-541- 035.33, $35,000 budgeted. ATTACHMENT Proposal from Knight & Mathis crated February 22, 2002 March 5, 2002 ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously retroactively approved the emergency purchase order to Knight and Mathis in the amount of $13,365.60 and the $2,875 advance, as recommended in the memorandum. 11.G.6. JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT - SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. - BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC. The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2002: TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: James Chandler, County Administrator James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works DirectQr___ Christopher J. Kafer, Jr , P E , County Engine Award Contract for Public Improvements to Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge — IRC Project No. 9724 DATE: February 27, 2002 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Brad Smith Associates, Inc. has completed the design for restroom facilities and related improvements for Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge This project includes improvements at three sites (Sunnan Tract, Kennedy Tract and the Cairns Tract). The project was formally bid as follows: Bid Opening Date: Advertisement Date: Bid Packages Picked -up: Bids Received: January 23, 2002 November 27, 2001 and December 4, 2001 Twelve (12) Two (2) March 5, 2002 CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED 131D TABULATIONS CORRECTED BID TABULATIONS Summit Construction Management, Inc. Vero Beach, Florida $1,310,058.61 $1,314,766.41 CEM Apopka, Enterprises, Inc Florida $2,393,197.65 $2,388,684.65 March 5, 2002 Due to the project funding constraints, the following items were modified from the original bid: Landscaping downsized Two Kiosks revised and downsized To Post Mounted Kiosks Temporary Irrigation (reduced) TOTAL REDUCTION = ($ 64,475.20) ($ 43,230.00) ($ 4,000.00) ($111,705.20) The revised project cost is $1,214,911.21 which is deteiuiined as follows: BREAKDOWN OF COSTS TOTAL CAIRNS SITE Bid Amount $1,314,766.41 $425,552.68 Reductions -$111,70520 -$47,722.40 REVISED CONSTR. COST $1,203,061.21 $377,830.28 ADDITIO\ S Testing Allowance Rodney Hall House Moving Archeologist Allowance TOTAL ADDITIO\S KENNEDY/ SURMAN SITE $889,213.73 -$63,982.80 $825,230.93 TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,000.00 $850.00 $5,000.00 $11,850.00 $2,000.00 $850.00 $2,500.00 $5,350.00 $1,214,911.21 $383,180.28 $4,000.00 $2,500.00 $6,500.00 $831,730.93 SOURCE OF FUNDING FDOT LAP Grant Utilities (Pelican Park Force Main Account 11472 000-169-511) Tree Fine Fund * Environmental Land Bond Fund (Acct. #125-146-539-033.19) * Wetland Mitigation Fund (Acct. #601-000-220-018 00) TOTAL- TOTAL $ 687,968.00 CAIRNS $ 24,623.47 KEN\ ED Y/ SURMAN SITE $663 344.53 $ 118,386.40 $ 50,000.00 $118,386.40 $ 50,000.00 $ 355,056.81 $355,056.81 $ 3,500.00 $1,214,911.21 $ 3,500.00 $ $383,180.28 $831,730.93 RECOM'MIE\ DATIONS Staff recommends the bid be awarded to Summit Construction Management, Inc. in the amount of $1,203,061.21 and approve an allowance for additions of $11,850.00 for related services as needed for a total project cost of $1,214 911.21. ATTACHMENTS Agreement Wetland Mitigation Fund letter dated September 23, 1999 Bid Comparison Spreadsheet March 5, 2002 a Commissioner Adams MOVED to approve; there was no second at this time. Chairman Stanbridge pointed out this project has been worked and reworked. It is a very ambitious project with all the partners involved. Commissioner Ginn asked the extent of the cost to the Utilities Department, and County Engineer Chris Kafer advised that the Utilities Department will pay for the 6" force main that runs about 7300 feet along AIA; he understood they hope to recoup that through future connections. Mr. Kafer continued to respond to questions and understood that there will be gates close to Jungle Trail that will be locked at dark. Chairman Stanbridge advised that maintenance will be turned over to USF&W who will also patrol the area. She also recounted how she wrote the grant that brought the seed money for this and other enhancement projects to the County. She stressed the money paying for this project is not from the County's dollars but from Federal grants which could have gone to another community. She felt this will be a magnificent project. Mr Kafer then did a presentation with graphics displayed on the overhead and described the various improvements made in the area. He described the locations and the improvements planned at each site. At the Cairns site at the south end, there will be a circular entry drive with 11 parking spaces on a porous pavement. He described how this porous design is constructed which they hope will be fairly maintenance -free. There will be a restroom which meets ADA requirements, a guest cabin which will be placed on a foundation, drainage improvements, wetland mitigation, a kiosk, and landscaping. Some of the live oaks and cabbage palms were eliminated from the landscaping plan as a cost- saving measure on all three improved sites. Moving north to the Sherman site that also has the porous pavement with 14 parking spaces and 36 grass parking spaces, drainage, and landscaping. USF&W is planning an overlook, wetland restoration, boardwalks, nature March 5, 2002 118 BR !L PG7I9 .n; • • fr 1`. trails, a vehicular access, and an observation tower overlooking Pelican Island. The far north end of Jungle Trail is the Kennedy site with 12 parking spaces, a restroom facility, a kiosk and infonuational signs. The original kiosks were planned to be larger, but these were downsized to save costs. Chairman Stanbridge advised that for more improvements, more grants will be needed. She commented that the full plan may not be completed for 20-30 years and it may take decades to restore the hammock growth. ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously awarded the bid to Summit Construction Management, Inc. in the amount of $1,203,061.21 and approved an allowance for additions of $11,850.00 for related services as needed, for a total project cost of $1,214,911.21, as recommended in the memorandum. COPY OF AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO JUNGLE TRAIL/PEI ICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE BID NO. 4033, PROJECT 9724 ARE ON FII E IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TOT HE BOARD 11.H. WATER MAIN INSTALLATION FOR 47TH, 48TH, AND 49TH AVENUES BETWEEN 41ST STREET AND 43RD STREET - (GIFFORD LANDFILL) FLORIDA WATER SUPPLY RESTORATION PROGRAM The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 22, 2002: DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 TO: FROM: March 5, 2002 JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADNIINISTRATOOR W. ERIK OLSON DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES 119 0r; Ln • • PREPARED AARON J. BOWLES, P.E. AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES gg SUBJECT: WATERMAIN INSTALLATION FOR 47TH, 48TH AND 49TH AVENLES BETWEEN 41ST STREET AND 43RD STREET BACKGROUND The Department of Environmental Health has identified a residence with excessive contaminated levels of trichloroethylene in their well water (see attached letter from M.J. Galanis, M.P.H. to affected residents dated November 27, 2001). The contaminated water was found at 4115 47th Avenue, in Gifford The identified organic compounds may have either originated from the old abandoned Gifford Landfill which was located on the south side of 41st Street, west of 43rd Avenue, or from one of the salvage yards located on the south side of 45th Street, west of 43rd Avenue. The Solid Waste Disposal District's continuing services consulting engineer, Geosyntech, has investigated the source of contamination emanating from the landfill as part of an evaluation of that site required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). As per their report, dated January 2001, groundwater contamination has occurred primarily south of 41St Street, however contamination may spread to surrounding properties. Included in these properties are those residences to the north of 41St Street and south of 43`d Street, along 47th thru 49th Avenues. Evidence of this potential contamination has already been documented as per the above-mentioned 4115 47th Avenue address and those addresses listed in the attached memo from Glen Schuessler dated February 21, 2001. The Utilities Department, in conjunction with the Department of Health, feels it is necessary to extend a potable water supply system to the subject properties in the event contaminants are identified in the wells. Upon identification of contaminants reimbursement will be available from the FDEP under the Florida Water Supply Restoration Program. Scheduled monitoring of the surrounding properties is being performed and upon identification of individual contaminated wells, the Department of Utility Services will request funding from the FDEP for fees associated with connection of the subject residences. ANALYSIS 47th, 48th and 49th Avenues will have water mains extended to complete a looped system from 41c Street to 43`d Street. A 6" diameter water main will be extended 550 feet north along 47th Avenue from an existing 6" diameter water math located at 47th Avenue and 42"d Street. 1,245 feet of 6" diameter water main will be extended north on 49th Avenue from 41c Street to 43rd Street and then Looped back to 48th Avenue via 620 feet of 6" diameter water main along 43rd Street. A 6" water main exists on 48th Avenue from 41c Street to just south of 43rd Street. 47th and 48th Avenues will be looped via 510 feet of 6" diameter water math on 42nd Street. In all, a total of 2,925 feet of water main will be installed. FDEP will fiord line extension fees for water main extensions excluding fire hydrant costs. The estimated cost to extend the water maul as described above is $88,652.39 (see attached cost estimate). The construction cost will be recovered at an average rate of $14.29 per lineal foot. If all wells test positive for contamination and are eligible for funding, the County will be able to recoup $83,592.39, or 94.3% of the total cost. March 5, 2002 120 BKI2Ias 21 a„ 44, The average connection charges being funded by the FDEP for residences where wells have been tested positive for contamination are as follows: Impact Fee $ 1,300.00 Line Extension Fee (Average per lot, inclusive of tap) (182.80 feet @ $14.29 per foot) $ 2,612.21 Meter Installation Fee $ 130.00 Inspection Fee $ 25.00 Total $ 4,067.21 Each resident will be required to pay a $50 deposit. RECOMMENDATION The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize construction of the subject water distribution system begin connecting the residences which test positive for contamination to the County water system and authorize collecting funds from the FDEP under the Florida Water Supply Restoration Program, as presented. Attachment A: Letters from the Health Department indicating findings and requested action. Attachment B: Sketch of Proposed Improvements Attachment C: Engineer's Cost Estimate ACCOUNT Ii\ -FORMATION: NAME: 47th — 49th Avenue Water Main Extension north of 41 s` Street (Capital Improvements Fund) AMOUNT $88,652.39 ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously (4-0, Vice Chairman Tippin away from the table) authorized construction of the subject water distribution system, to begin connecting the residences which test positive for contamination to the County's water system, and authorized the collection of funds from the FDEP under the Florida Water Supply Restoration Program, as presented and recommended in the memorandum. March 5, 2002 13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - UPDATES - SCHOOL BUS ACCIDENT COMMENTS Chairman Stanbridge recounted a recent school bus/tractor trailer accident and complimented all the emergency services personnel: deputies, firefighters, and paramedics for working well together in responding to this accident. Commissioner Adams also congratulated the School Board on their notification process to parents of students who were passengers on the bus 13.11 PROPOSED LEGISLATION CONCERNING AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE FOR ELECTIONS (SENATE BILL 1504) Commissioner Ginn expressed her concerns with this proposed legislation and called attention to the places she had marked in a copy of the proposed bill: particularly Section 3 on page 5 concerning closed captioning; the top of page 10 concerning accessibility at polling places; page 11 proposing an accessibility survey; page 20 concerning two issues; and pages 21 and 23. (CLERK'S NOTE- COPY OF BILL 1504 IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ) There was a brief discussion concerning these additional "unfunded mandates" and the fact that now is a good time to contact our Legislators since this bill is still in committee. Commissioner Adams suggested Commissioner Ginn follow through on this; Commissioner Ginn agreed to pursue this issue and report back to the Board. 13.E. COMMISSIONER MACHT - CONSIDERATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE RECENTLY APPROVED COMPREHENSIVE POLICY FOR FUNDING OUTSIDE AGENCIES Commissioner Macht was concerned about a previous decision made by the Board setting a comprehensive policy for funding outside agencies. He felt that perhaps the action March 5, 2002 122 2 3 • • IY was taken without due consideration. In particular he questioned the definition of an "outside agency", which agencies perform a service that the County would be required to do, and just what is the County's responsibility. He thought the matter had been handled rather precipitously and without a public hearing. He proposed a moratorium on implementation or deferral of the policy until a public hearing or workshop can be held in order to get insights from the affected agencies. He asked the Board to reconsider and MOVED for a workshop, to be followed by a public hearing, to determine the extent to which this policy should be implemented. Commissioner Adams understood that the Board had deferred the matter to budget time and that would be sufficient public hearing for her. Chairman Stanbridge ruled the motion DIED for lack of a second. She recalled that the Board was going to wait for completion of the survey mapping before reconsidering Children's Services. Commissioner Ginn reported on a conversation with Jean Kline with respect to the Children's Services Needs Assessment. The County's Human Services Division, along with the United Way, is doing the asset mapping. She suggested a report on what is being done and how it is progressing. Health Department Administrator Jean Kline advised that she chairs the Needs Assessment Subcommittee for the Children's Services Advisory Committee. She advised that the project is pretty much on time and asked her associate to update the Board. Health Department Special Projects Coordinator Vince Kalson advised that all three phases of the project are due by the end of the month. The first phase is gathering the demographics to help in the determination of need, discovering such things as where the children live, what their needs are, and where the college scholarships are being awarded. The second phase is a survey of need or what the professionals (such as pediatricians, March 5, 2002 123 2 Fq • K QP psychiatrists, Sheriffs Office, family lawyers, Department of Juvenile Justice, and Clerk of Court) perceive as the needs for children. Forty of the 211 surveys have been returned. After 10 more are returned, the data from those responses will be input into SPSS after which different types of information can be sorted/obtained. Finally, the third phase is to identify the services already provided in the area. Some work is being done by United Way on the agencies in the area. Then the three will be melded together for the final assessment. He emphasized that the task is long, complex, abstract and they want it to be credible. Also it is important that it have a local flavor. Commissioner Macht again requested the Board reconsider and asked that the issue be aired in a public forum. Conunissioner Ginn maintained the agencies need to begin to look upon the money from the County as seed money to set up a framework. After four years, the Board should evaluate the program, the public support of it, and the availability of other resources. She also thought the Veterans Council should be removed from the non -profits and moved in- house Assistant Administrator Baird advised that the Veterans Council has been moved and explained that either the County must hire someone part-time for the Veterans Council or pay the Veterans Council to administer the program. Commissioner Macht agreed that the Board should make an independent determination whether to continue funding a particular group or agency based on effectiveness and continuing need rather than just a "drop dead" date. Commissioner Ginn reasoned this might be the beginning of a framework and as we proceed with it we will discover its short -comings and whether or not it works. Commissioner Macht reminded her that other groups also fall into this funding, such as the Substance Abuse Council with Federal & State funding, for which the County has March 5, 2002 124 BK nn V accepted continuing responsibility. He thought the broad brush approach is inappropriate and rather arbitrary and begged the Board to reconsider and hold a public hearing in order to hear from the individuals involved. 14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are being prepared separately. 14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD The Chairman announced that following the Solid Waste Disposal District meeting, the Commissioners would sit as the Board of Commissioners of the Environmental Control Board. Those minutes are being prepared separately. There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 11:57 a.m. ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Minutes approved (Jj. March 5, 2002