HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/6/2001MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY' COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2001 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman District 5
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Vice Chairman District 2
Fran B. Adams
Kenneth R. Macht
John \\ . Tippin
District 1
District 3
District 4
•
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Andrew Jefferson
St. Peters Missionary Baptist Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
BACKUP
PAGES
Comm. Fran B Adams
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITION 13.E. Reappointment of Mike Ziegler to Indian River County
Extension Advisory Council
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation of Proclamation in Recognition of the Vero Beach
Art Club on their Fiftieth "Under the Oaks" Art Show
1
B Presentation of Proclamation Designating March 5-11, 2001 as
Mentally Handicapped Week 2
C. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring Pelican Island on its
Ninety Eighth Birthday 3
D. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Month of March
2001 as Mental Retardation Awareness Month in Indian River
County, FL 4
BK I17 PG 247
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated February 15, 2001)
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated February 22, 2001)
C. Children Services Advisory Committee 1999/2000 Annual
Report
(letter dated February 26, 2001)
D. Request to Modify the Planning Division's Fee Schedule
for Concurrency Determination Application Fees
(memorandum dated February 20, 2001)
(deferred from February 20, 2001 Commission meeting)
E Appointment of Adam S. Bolinger to the Land Acquisition
Advisory Committee (LAAC)
(memorandum dated 26, 2001)
F. Out -of -County Travel for Commissioners and Staff to Attend
the 2001 National Association of Telecommunications Officers
and Advisors (NATOA) Regional Workshop
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
G. Notification from the City of Sebastian of their Appointment
to the Emergency Services Advisory Committee (ESDAC)
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
H. Bureau of Justice Assistance — Request for Grant Funds
(Sheriff's Department)
(letter dated February 23, 2001)
I. Florida Inland Navigation District Grant Application
(Shenff's Department)
(letter dated February 26, 2001)
J. Public Notice for TEFRA Hearing (Tax Equity Fiscal Respon-
sibility Act) Financial Responsibility for The Palms at Vero
(memorandum dated February 27, 2001)
K. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
BK 117 PG 248
BACKUP
PAGES
5-14
15-26
27-46
47-53
54-55
56-63
64-65
66-79
80-129
130
131-137
•
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
L Rex & Nancy Keiser Request for Release of Easement at
3425 65`h Ave. (Lot 34, Oak Chase Subdivision Phase I)
(memorandum dated February 13, 2001)
M. Decision of Appellate Panel — Brown v Indian River County
(memorandum dated February 28, 2001)
N. Request for Placement of Sign/Plaque at Hobart Park Fair-
ground
(memorandum from Fran B Adams)
O. Local Option Gas Tax, Indian River County Code Chapter
209
(memorandum dated February 22, 2001)
P. Costs for 2000 County Tax Deed Applications
(memorandum dated February 19, 2001)
Q. Approval of Bid Award, Bid #3033 Westwood Subdivision
Water Assessment Project
(memorandum dated February 14, 2001)
R. Approval of Bid Award #3045 Anita Park Subdivision
Assessment Project
(memorandum dated February 14, 2001)
S. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for
River Bend Golf Club Planned Development
(memorandum dated February 23, 2001)
T
Change Order No. 1 — Ranger Construction Industries, Inc.
(memorandum dated February 23, 2001)
U. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated February 28, 2001)
V. Vineyard Development Corporation Request for Final Plat
Approval for The Vineyard Subdivision
(memorandum dated February 14, 2001)
•
BACKUP
PAGES
138-142
143-147
148
149
150-161
162-176
177-194
195-197
198-200
201-202
203-213
BK 1 7PG249
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Sebastian Water Expansion Phase III -B
Resolution III
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
2. Paving and Drainage Improvements to 34th Ave.
SW, 35th Ave. SW and Intersection Streets in
Grovenor Estates S/D
(memorandum dated February 27, 2001)
3. Suntree Partners Inc.'s Request to Modify Certain
Approved Conceptual Plan Setbacks for Citrus
Springs PD (Legislative)
(memorandum dated February 27, 2001)
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from Joe Wiggins to address concerns
regarding 11th St. S.W. paving and code enforcement
(memorandum received February 9, 2001)
(deferred from BCC Meeting of Feb. 20, 2001)
2. County Road 512 Charrette Presentation by City of
Sebastian and Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council
(letter dated February 22, 2001)
3. Robert J. Leshe, City Councilman of Indian River
Shores — Re• Lost Tree Islands
(no backup)
BACKUP
PAGES
214-237
238-275
276-331
332-335
336
4. Affordable Housing Impact Fee Financing
(memorandum dated February 28, 2001) 337
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
1. Public Hearing - Tuesday, March 20, 2001, 7:00 p.m. in
Sebastian City Council Chambers
Sebastian Water Expansion — Phase III -B, Resolution III
(memorandum dated February 23, 2001)
338-339
BRI PG 50
•
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.):
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS (cont'd.):
2. Scheduled for Public Hearing March 20, 2001:
a. Applicant's Request for the Board to Recon
sider the Recreation Tract Area Condition
Attached to the Approval of the Legend Lakes
PD (Legislative)
b. Land Development Regulations Amendment:
North Barrier Island Corridor Special Regu
lations (Legislative)
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
3. Scheduled for Public Hearing on April 4, 2001: TEFRA
(Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act) Financial Respon-
sibility for The Palms at Vero
(backup — see page 130)
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Legislative Considerations
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
1. Staff Report on the Status of Development Projects
Adjacent to Jungle Trail
(postponed from Feb. 20, 2001 Commission meeting)
(memorandum dated February 22, 2001)
Request to Rescind River Island Planned Development
(PD) Plan Approval (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated February 28, 2001)
B. Emergency Services
Purchase of a Racal Communications Logging Recorder
for the Vero Beach Police Department E911 Public Safety
Answering Point (PSAP) on a Sole Source Basis
(memorandum dated February 16, 2001)
C. General Services
Indian River County Jail Detention Electronics Phase I
(memorandum dated February 19, 2001)
D. Leisure Services
None
•
BACKUP
PAGES
340
341-343
344-348
349-360
361-363
364-394
BW PG 25!
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
E. Office of Management and Budget
1. Fourth of July Fireworks Funding — Budget
Amendment 013
(memorandum dated February 28, 2001)
2. Policy for Distributing Choose Life License
Plate Funds to Qualified Non -Profit Agencies
(memorandum dated February 27, 2001)
F Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1. Kings Highway Phase I, Construction Services
Final Release of Retainage
(memorandum dated February 13, 2001)
2. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer
Services (FDACS) Amendment to Grants #4031,
#4617, and #5649
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
H. Utilities
1. Developer's Agreement for River Bend Subdivision
Force Main Construction
(memorandum dated February 23, 2001)
2. Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway Company
Additions to FEC Blanket Agreement
(memorandum dated February 19, 2001)
I. Human Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
Land Acquisition Advisory Committee
(memorandum dated February 27, 2001)
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Resolution in Support of Funding for Regional Planning
Councils
(memorandum dated February 22, 2001)
BK ! pr 252
r
BACKUP
PAGES
•
395-396
397-401
402-403
404 416
417-429
43 0-43 9
440-442
443-445
•
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd.):
B. Vice Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Update
(no backup provided)
C. Commissioner Fran B. Adams
D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E Commissioner John W. Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of Feb. 13, 2001
2. Approval for District to Accept Title for a Fire
Safety House Used to Train Children in Fire Safety
Donated by the Vero Beach Firefighters Association
and Vero Beach Volunteer Fire Department
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
3. Funding Authorization to Purchase and Replace
Water Tank on Pumper (Vehicle 528)
(memorandum dated February 26, 2001)
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
None
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
BK PG 253
•
BACKI'P
PAGES
446-457
458-460
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting nzav be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p.m.
BK i PG2514
r
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF MARCH 6, 2001
1. CALL TO ORDER 1
2. INVOCATION 1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA 1
5.A. PROCLAMATION - IN RECOGNITION OF THE VERO BEACH ART CLUB
ON ITS 50TH ` UNDER THE OAKS" ART SHOW 2
5.B. PROCLAMATION - DESIGNATING MARCH 5-11, 2001 AS MENTALLY
HANDICAPPED WEEK 3
5.C. PROCLAMATIONS - HONORING PELICAN ISLAND ON ITS 98TH
BIRTHDAY 4
5.D. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MARCH 2001 AS MENTAL
RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 6
7 CONSENT AGENDA 7
7.A. Approval of Warrants 7
7 B Approval of Warrants 15
7.C. Children s Services Advisory Committee 1999/2000 Annual Report 25
7.D. Modification of Planning Division's Fee Schedule for Concurrency
Determination Application Fees 26
7 E Appointment of Adam S. Bolinger to the Land Acquisition Advisory
Committee (LAAC) to Fill Vacancy Caused by Resignation of Bob Swift
28
7.F. Out -of -County Travel for Commissioners and Staff to Attend the 2001
National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors
(NATOA) Regional Workshop 29
1
•
BK 1 1 255
7.G. City of Sebastian - Appointment of City Manager Terrence Moore to the
Emergency Services District Advisory Committee (ESDAC) 30
7.H. Bureau of Justice Assistance - Request for Grant Funds (Replacement
Bulletproof Vests) 30
7.I. Resolution No. 2001-021A - Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND)
Grant Application - Novurania 24' Inflatable Patrol Boat for Sheriff's
Office Marine Unit 32
7.J. Public Notice - TEFRA (Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act) Hearing -
Financial Responsibility for The Palms at Vero 35
7.K. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012 36
7 L Resolution No 2001-022 - Rex and Nancy Keiser - Request for Release of
Easement at 3425 65th Avenue (Lot 34, Oak Chase Subdivision Phase I)
43
7.M. Decision of Appellate Panel - Brown v Indian River County - Boston
Homes, Inc. (d/b/a Orchid Dunes of Vero Beach) - Case No. 00 -259 -CA -20
47
7.N. Hobart Park Fairgrounds - Sign/Plaque in Honor of Wilbour D "Zip"
Tripp, Jr. Founder of the Firefighters Indian River County Fair 48
7.0. Local Option Gas Tax - Schedule Public Hearing 49
7.P. Costs for 2000 County Tax Deed Applications 50
7.Q. Bid Award #3033 - Westwood Subdivision Water Assessment Project
Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc. 51
7.R. Bid Award #3045 - Anita Park Subdivision Water Assessment Project -
Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc. 52
7.S. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for River Bend Golf Club Planned
Development (Shopco Advisory Corp.) 55
7.T. Bid 43041 - Emergency Dune Restoration - Change Order No. 1 - Ranger
Construction Industries, Inc. 56
7.U. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs 57
7.V. Vineyard Development Corporation - Request for Final Plat Approval for
The Vineyard Subdivision 59
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -B 60
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 34TH
AVENUE SW, 35TH AVENUE SW AND INTERSECTING STREETS IN
GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION - DECISION TO HOLD A
WORKSHOP ON PAVING PROJECTS 63
2
BKfIf
X50
• •
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - SUNTREE PAR I'NERS INC. - REQUEST TO MODIFY
CERTAIN APPROVED CONCEPTUAL PLAN SETBACKS FOR CITRUS
SPRINGS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (Legislative) 67
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - JOE WIGGINS - CONCERNS REGARDING
11TH STREET SW PAVING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT (deferred from
meeting of 2/20/2001) 74
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - COUNTY ROAD 512 CHARRETTE
PRESENTATION BY CITY OF SEBASTIAN AND TREASURE COAST
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL 80
9.B.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - ROBERT J. LESHE, CITY COUNCILMAN OF
INDIAN RIVER SHORES REGARDING LOST TREE ISLANDS 86
9.B.4. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEE
FINANCING - PRESENTATIONS BY THE RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA,
INC.. THE PALMS, AND LINDSEY GARDENS 88
9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 20, 2001
AT 7:00 P.M. IN SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Sebastian Water Expansion - Phase III -B, Resolution III 99
9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH
20, 2001: 99
a. Applicant's Request for the Board to Reconsider the Recreation
Tract Area Condition Attached to the Approval of the Legend Lakes PD
(Legislative) 100
b. Land Development Regulations Amendment North Barrier Island
Corridor Special Regulations (Legislative) 100
9.C.3. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 3,
2001 - TEFRA (TAX EQUITY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT) 101
Financial Responsibility for The Palms at Vero 101
10 A LEGISLATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES - 2001 LEGISLATIVE SESSION -
NABORS, GIBLIN, AND NICKERSON, P.A. (SARAH M. BLEAKLEY) .. 101
3
�� FG 257
11.A.1. STATUS REPORT OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ADJACENT TO
JUNGLE TRAIL (postponed from 2/20/01) 102
11.A.2. REQUEST TO RESCIND RIVER ISLAND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
(PD) PLAN APPROVAL (Quasi -Judicial) 108
11.B. PURCHASE OF RACAL COMMUNICATIONS LOGGING RECORDER FOR
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT E911 PUBLIC SAFETY
ANSWERING POINT (PSAP) ON A SOLE SOURCE BASIS - REPLAY
SYSTEMS 111
11.C. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL DETENTION ELECTRONICS PHASE I -
MONTGOMERY TECHNOLOGY, SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES,
LANDIS DIVISION 113
11 E 1 BUDGET AMENDMENT 013 - FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS
FUNDING - CITY OF VERO BEACH AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN . 115
11 E 2 POLICY FOR DISTRIBUTING "CHOOSE LIFE" LICENSE PLATE
FUNDS TO QUALIFIED NON-PROFIT AGENCIES 118
11.G.1. KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE I - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES -
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - FINAL RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE 119
11.G.2. FAIRGROUNDS BUILDINGS - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE & CONSUMER SERVICES (FDACS) AMENDMENT
TO GRANTS #4031, #4617, AND #5649 (AUDIT PROVISIONS
CHANGES) 121
11.H.1. RIVER BEND SUBDIVISION FORCE MAIN CONSTRUCTION -
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT - RIVER BEND 296 LLC 122
11.H.2. FLORIDA EAST COAST (FEC) RAILWAY COMPANY ADDITIONS
TO FEC BLANKET AGREEMENT 125
12 A LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND ACQUISITION
GUIDE 126
4
81< 7 PG 258
13.A. CHAIRMAN GINN - RESOLUTION #2001-023 - SUPPORT FUNDING FOR
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS 128
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - UPDATE 131
13 E COMMISSIONER TIPPIN - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXTENSION
ADVISORY COUNCIL DISTRICT IV, REAPPOINTMENT OF MIKE
ZIEGLER 131
SPECIAL REPORT - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 132
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 132
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 132
14 C ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD 133
•
March 6, 2001
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, March 6, 2001. Present were Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman; Ruth Stanbridge,
Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; and John W. Tippin. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht was
out of town with County Attorney Paul G. Bangel on County business. Also present were
James E Chandler, County Administrator; William G. Collins, II, Deputy County Attorney;
and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Andrew Jefferson, St. Peters Missionary Baptist Church, delivered the
invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Adams led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Commissioner Pippin requested the addition of 13 E Appointment (Reappointment
of Mike Ziegler) to the Indian River County Extension Advisory Council.
March 6, 2001
1
BK
60
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) made the above addition to the
agenda.
5.A. PROCLAMATION - IN RECOGNITION OF THE VERO BEACH
ART CLUB ON ITS 50TH "UNDER THE OAKS" ART SHOW
Chairman Ginn read the following proclamation and presented it to Jean Peterson,
President of the Vero Beach Art Club, who accepted it with thanks on behalf of the 500+
artists and art lovers in the club.
Ms. Peterson advised that this show has been their mayor fund-raiser for many years
and they use the proceeds to support community scholarships and art programs. She thanked
the community for all their support.
PROCLAMATION
IN RECOGNITION OF THE VERO BEACH ART CLUB
ON ITS FIFTIETH
"UNDER THE OAKS" ART SHOW
WHEREAS, on November 20, 1936, five people interested in drawing and painting
met for the first time to form a group called the Vero Beach Sketch Club, meeting each
Monday evening during the winter months to work and discuss all aspects of art Their
first exhibition, held in 1937, featured works by artists from Fort Pierce to Sebastian; and
WHEREAS, by-laws were drafted in 1951, and the group renamed itself the Vero
Beach Art Club in 1954. During its formative years, the club maintained studios in
various locations in downtown Vero Beach and established an annual Members' Art
Show held at the Old Community Center and the Heritage Center; and
WHEREAS, the first outdoor art show was established in 1972, and became an
instant success. Presented in the springtime each year since that time, it has gained
national recognition as the "Under the Oaks" Outdoor Art Show; and
March 6, 2001
2
BK I i 7 P3 261
• •
WHEREAS, it is stated in the Articles of Incorporation of the Vero Beach Art Club
that their purpose shall be to further the interests of area artists and to encourage the
appreciation of their work in Vero Beach and the Indian River County area and
vigorously to pursue activities, including but not limited to, meetings, exhibitions, and
educational opportunities which will advance these objectives.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA that the Board supports the
Vero Beach Art Club's Fiftieth "Under The Oaks" Art Show, to be held at Riverside Park
on March 10 and 11, 2001
Adopted this 6th day of March, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Chaigme,;,,c)
5.B. PROCLAMATION - DESIGNATING MARCH 5-11, 2001 AS
MENTALLY HANDICAPPED WEEK
Chairman Ginn read the following proclamation; there was no representative present
to accept it.
i
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING MARCH 5-11, 2001
AS MENTALLY HANDICAPPED WEEK
WHEREAS, the Knights of Columbus, Vero Beach Council #5629, will be
conducting its 33rd annual Tootsie Roll Drive to help the mentally handicapped citizens
of Indian River County; and
March 6, 2001
3
262
1
WHEREAS, the proceeds from the donations will be used by the Knights of
Columbus for local programs and activities such as the mentally handicap workshop
and Special Olympics program, and
WHEREAS, on a nationwide basis, the Knights of Columbus Councils will be
conducting similar events during the same time span; and
WHEREAS, with the help of many friends and local organizations who have
volunteered to assist the Knights of Columbus in this years endeavor, it is anticipated
that the proceeds generated will be far in excess of last years total- and
WHEREAS, it is altogether fitting and proper to officially recognize this worthy
cause, and to help create a public awareness and appreciation for all those who will be
"aproned and canistered" on March 8, 9, and 10, 2001 and most of all, for all those who
will contribute what they can from their hearts and pockets to assist the mentally
handicapped.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that March 5 through
March 11, 2001, be officially observed as
MENTALLY HANDICAPPED WEEK
in Indian River County, and that special recognition be given to these dates in support of
this worthwhile endeavor.
Adopted this 6th day of March, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA
ZlL2tc�GG .. ('. Clcxlt�
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
5.C. PROCLAMATIONS - HONORING PELICAN ISLAND ON ITS
98TH BIRTHDAY
Chairman Ginn read the following proclamation which was accepted with thanks by
Paul Tritaik and Walter Stieglitz. They invited everyone to come to the celebration on
Sunday.
March 6, 2001
4
BK 1 1 7 PG 2 6 3
• •
PROCLAMATION
HONORING PELICAN ISLAND
ON ITS NINETY-EIGHTH BIRTHDAY
WHEREAS, in 1882 when Paul Kroegel and his father came to homestead
across from Pelican Island, Newhaven was the name given to the post office and
area. Schooners and steamboats carried passengers and goods on the Indian
River. Reverend Thomas New, who founded Newhaven, also attempted to dig an
inlet from the Indian River to the Ocean, and
WHEREAS, in 1884 the name of the post office was changed to Sebastian,
and the Flonda State Census of 1885 listed six heads of households Fishing, citrus
and winter vegetables were the main crops, and in 1885 the Honda East Coast
Railroad brought tourists, who supported the booming fishing industry; and
WHEREAS, the rich beauty and bountiful harvest from the Indian River also
attracted the interest of scientists and photographers. Paul Kroegel grew concerned
about the birdlife of the tiny Pelican Island and by 1903 he had convinced President
Theodore Roosevelt to establish by Executive Order the first National Wildlife
Refuge. Paul Kroegel became its first warden and today Sebastian and Pelican
Island are important parts of Indian River County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board extends
heartfelt congratulations and best wishes to Pelican Island for a Very Happy Ninety-
eighth Birthday, and looks forward to its Centennial Celebration.
Adopted this 6th day of March, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Cf'(airman
March 6, 2001
5
Bpj
7 26.}
v�
5.D. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MARCH 2001 AS MENTAL
RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Chairman Ginn read the following proclamation which was accepted by Debbe
Liscomb on behalf of the Directors of ARC:
r
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF MARCH, 2001, AS
MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH
IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, mental retardation is a condition which affects more than 7 million Americans and
their families; and
WHEREAS, public awareness and education enhance a community's understanding of the
issues affecting people with mental retardation; and
WHEREAS, people with mental retardation can be vital and vibrant members of our communities,
improving the quality of life for all of us; and
WHEREAS, the month of March has been designated National Mental Retardation Awareness
Month, with more than 120,000 members and 1,000 chapters of the Association for Retarded Citizens
(ARC) undertaking public awareness, educational and fundraising initiatives; and
WHEREAS, the ARC of the United States is the nation's leading volunteer -based organization
advocating for and with people with mental retardation and related developmental disabilities and their
families.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of March, 2001, be recognized as
MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH
in Indian River County, Florida, and urges the citizens of Indian River County to give full support towards
efforts to enable people with mental retardation to live full and productive lives of inclusion in our
communities.
Adopted this 6th day of March, 2001.
_..� SW'F7s.
41' �t1,
t•• ; •
c: •
�� a
March 6, 2001
. 1..
alb
vj
• f `.
E. vP1Y
• .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
•
Caroline D. Ginn, Chai : an
6
c
7 F
•
•
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Ginn requested that item 7.C. be separated from the Consent Agenda.
7.A. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 15, 2001:
March 6, 2001
REST OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
7
J{1 ! s P' iJ 7
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2001
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board. for the time period of February 9. 2001 to February 15, 2001.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) the list of warrants issued by the
Clerk to the Board for the period February 9-15, 2001, as
requested.
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
O 021018
O 021019
0021020
0021021
0021022
0021023
O 021024
O 021025
0021026
O 021027
O 021028
0021029
0021030
O 021031
O 021032
O 021033
O 021034
0021035
O 021036
O 021037
O 021038
March 6, 2001
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
WI SCTF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
IRS - ACS
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
NACO/SOUTHEAST
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
3
8
17 PG 267
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-09
2001-02-09
2001-02-09
2001-02-09
2001-02-09
2001-02-09
2001-02-09
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
CHECK
AMOUNT
16,725.00
3,902.04
4,749.05
2,379.75
513.00
12,031.20
194.40
138.50
115.38
150.00
170.00
121.04
50.00
664.73
2,500.00
79,590.10
213.83
9,173.07
476.93
23.08
120.92
• •
CHECK
NUMBER
O 021039
O 021040
O 297297
0297298
0297299
O 297300
0297301
0297302
0297303
0297304
O 297305
O 297306
O 297307
O 297308
O 297309
O 297310
0297311
O 297312
O 297313
0297314
0297315
O 297316
O 297317
0297318
O 297319
0297320
O 297321
O 297322
0297323
0297324
0297325
0297326
0297327
0297328
0297329
0297330
0297331
0297332
0297333
O 297334
O 297335
O 297336
0297337
O 297338
O 297339
O 297340
O 297341 B
O 297342 B
0297343 B
O 297344 B
O 297345 B
O 297346 B
O 297347 B
0297348 B
0297349 B
O 297350 B
0297351 C
NAME
FL SDU
THE GUARDIAN
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
ALBERTSONS SOUTHCO $4357
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
AMERON HOMES, INC
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
ATLANTIC REPORTING
AQUAGENIX
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT'L
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER, INC
A T & T
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
ARCH WIRELESS
ALTERATIONS
AMERIPATH FL, INC
A T & T
APOLLO ENTERPRISES
AMERITREND HOMES INC
ANCOR CORF INC.
ATLANTIC REPORTING
ABC PRINTING CO
A T & T MEDIA SERVICES
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
ARCH
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
ALACHUA PRESS INC
ASLA
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC
BARTON, JEFFREY K
BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUI
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BANNER PRESS, LLC
BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
BFI WASTE SYSTEMS
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BELLSOUTH
BEAZER HOMES, INC
OBCAT OF ORLANDO
LUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
EELER, THOMAS T
EIDLER, HENRY
USHNELL CORP
ANGEL, PAUL G
OUWMANS, KIRSTINA C
LUE PLANET
ROOKS, THERESA
ELLLOUTH
AMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-14
2001-02-14
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
9
CHECK
AMOUNT
7,588.00
18,940.47
1,731.35
307.54
288.00
500.00
1,433.28
754.10
195.00
29.95
720.37
415.25
347.22
40.49
462.54
216.35
309.25
475.86
39.75
52.00
35.40
216.67
500.00
153.00
944.15
600.00
75.00
51.00
127.75
18,361.65
25.11
63.95
3,286.74
40,553.58
3,375.25
298.08
2,032.95
5.00
1,433.71
320.00
1,132.70
262.10
25.00
879.72
25,790.81
1,000.00
55.67
36,642.67
54.31
15.08
417.23
529.63
3,332.35
2,892.75
61.62
1,669.11
10,458.39
BK
268
CHECK
NUMBER
O 29735
O 297353
0297354
O 297355
O 297356
0297357
0297358
O 297359
O 297360
O 297361
0297362
0297363
O 297364
O 297365
O 297366
0297367
O 297368
0297369
O 297370
O 297371
0297372
0297373
O 297374
O 297375
0297376
0297377
O 297378
O 297379
0297380
O 297381
0297382
0297383
O 297384
0297385
0297386
O 297387
0297388
0297389
0297390
0297391
0297392
0297393
0297394
0297395
0297396
0297397
0297398 D
O 297399 D
0297400 D
0297401 D
O 297402 D
0297403 D
0297404 E
0297405 E
0297406 E
0297407 E
0297408 E
NAME
2 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
ANDREW CHOQUETTE
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CARROLL DESIGNS INC
CHUCK'S NEWS STAND
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
CLINIC PHARMACY
COMPUTYPE, INC
CAPP CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF
CLEANNET USA
COWBOY PLASTICS
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
CAREER TRACK, INC
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
COLUMBIA HOUSE
COMMONS MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
COLUMBIA PROPANE
COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC
CENTER POINT PUBLISHING
CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
CHANNING CORP
COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
CHOICE PROCESS -ORLANDO
CHAMBERS, JESSE LEE JR
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CAPONI, FLORENCE B
CLERK OF COURTS
CHILI'S
CHARTONE INC
CERTFIED COURT REPORTERS
CODY & ASSOCIATES INC
CULLITY, LESLIE
COLBURN, SHEREE A
COASTAL CAD AND BLUEPRINT INC
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
DEMCO INC
DOCTORS' CLINIC
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
IROCCO CONSTRUCTION
ESIGNED TRAFFIC
OWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
ILLARD, CASSIE
OLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
IVINE SERVICE ENTERPRISES INC
MERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
DUCATIONAL RECORD CENTER, INC
VERMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC
XCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
SQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
10
61< w 7 PG
69
CHECK
AMOUNT
371.07
382.00
43.00
640.50
8,771.53
500.00
205.00
19,963.02
385.11
1,050.00
500.00
79.52
4,491.11
20,537.72
70.60
143.00
478.00
228.00
41.14
500.00
478.20
49.43
26.63
1,220.00
5,486.50
500.00
1,101.60
214.00
90.00
358.27
231.75
10.00
8.25
32.52
65.00
16,000.00
27.00
54.07
147.96
314.00
727.76
336.49
1,576.75
300.00
4,543.17
50.00
500.00
13,135.68
156.88
29.61
1,625.50
270.00
127.00
19.48
83.90
2,279.30
90.15
• •
CHECK
NUMBER
0297409
0297410
0297411
O 297412
O 297413
0297414
0297415
O 297416
0297417
0297418
0297419
O 297420
0297421
O 297422
0297423
O 297424
0297425
0297426
0297427
0297428
O 297429
0297430
O 297431
O 297432
0297433
O 297434
O 297435
0297436
O 297437
0297438
0297439
0297440
0297441
0297442
0297443
0297444
O 297445
0297446
O 297447
0297448
O 297449
O 297450
0297451
O 297452
O 297453
0297454
0297455
O 297456
O 297457
O 297458
O 297459
0297460
O 297461
O 297462
O 297463
O 297464
0297465
NAME
FEDEX
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLINN, SHEILA I
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
FIRSTLAB
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FULLER, APRIL L
FUCHS, SUSAN
FIRST UNION
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF EMER
FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
FLORIDA TRUST FOR HISTORIC
GATEWAY COMPANIES, INC
GALE GROUP, THE
GATOR LUMBER COMPANY
GENE'S AUTO GLASS
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
GERSTNER, CLARK
GANIO, CARL DPM
GRABEL, JORDAN MD
GENTGEN, JOAN 0
GOUGE, AIMEE
GLOBAL BUILDING CORP
GREENHAVEN PRESS INC
HAMMOND & SMITH, P A
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
HARRISON COMPANY, THE
HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
HEARTHSTONE BOOKSHOP
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER
HACH COMPANY
HADSELL, JENNIE
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
HTE INC
HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS
HURLEY,ROGNER,MILLER,COX AND
HUSTER, RICHARD MD
HARTSFIELD, KAREN K
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ISIS PUBLISHING
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
11
CHECK
AMOUNT
65.04
574.30
37.50
17,074.35
170.80
98.00
30.00
29.00
138.17
109.50
1,689.13
66.95
24.00
8,065.78
335.00
25.00
35.00
6,263.00
584.63
24.23
215.00
133.08
404.22
500.00
57.60
138.60
106.43
231.74
500.00
202.74
13,300.00
32.96
92.70
33.58
161.17
791.68
819.00
2,083.33
248.15
156.60
1,000.00
7,452.00
1,210.80
7,583.84
79.00
1,805.95
330.00
73.50
93,775.77
50.00
485.90
106.49
345.70
83.94
567.00
20.25
4,111.32
BK
1
G 270
CHECK
NUMBER
O 29746
029746
O 29746
029746
029747
O 29747
O 29747
O 297473
O 297474
0297475
O 297476
O 297477
0297478
0297479
O 297480
O 297481
O 297482
0297483
0297484
O 297485
0297486
0297487
0297488
0297489
0297490
O 297491
O 297492
0297493
O 297494
0297495
0297496
0297497
0297498
0297499
0297500
0297501
0297502
0297503
0297504
0297505
O 297506
0297507
O 297508
O 297509
0297510
0297511
0297512
0297513
0297514 M
0297515
0297516
0297517 M
0297518
0297519 M
0297520
0297521
0297522 ME
NAME
6 INDIAN RIVER MEDICAL
7 INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT
8 IBM CORPORATION
9 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
0 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
1 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE
2 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE -
IMI -NET, INC
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
JACKSON ELECTRONICS
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
JARA, INC
JENNINGS, ANTOINE
JOHNSON, ANSELMO, MURDOCK,
JACKSON, CARLOS
JUDAH, HUSTON
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
KREBS, JILL A
RAPER, CHRISTOPHER J, JR
KLEIN, BURY & ASSOCIATES, INC
KOUNS, ROGER
KELLER, JENAE
LAWMEN & SHOOTERS SUPPLY
LOS ANGELES DODGERS, INC
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
LOPRESTI, ETTA
LESCO, INC
LUNA, JORGE
LONGARDNER, SHARON A
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
LES CAMELA, ELISA M
LUNA, JUVENAL
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION
LAKE GRACE OF VERO BEACH LLC
LIFELINE MEDICAL SERVICE
LOWTHER CREMATION SERVICES INC
MARPAN SUPPLY COMPANY, INC
MID COAST TIRE SERVICE, INC
MIKES GARAGE
MILLER GOLF COMPANY
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT
MOON, NANCY
MACHT, KENNETH
MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
MDS MATRX
ICRO WAREHOUSE
MAC PAPERS, INC
MARTIN, PATRICIA
ID -STATE MECHANICAL
MULLER, MINTZ, KORNREICH,
IDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
MARRIOTT COURTYARD
MTW ROOFING COMPANY
DCHECK
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
12
BKII7FG27I
CHECK
AMOUNT
500.00
800.00
970.17
174.00
6.00
74,850.62
225,892.48
900.00
30.00
70.00
870.67
650.00
60.00
190.00
4,990.00
30.90
72.10
1,775.43
1,100.00
14.10
37.40
55.00
160.00
19.31
58.75
237.50
1,442.57
107.20
6.00
269.90
123.60
50.00
226.60
126.00
185.40
500.00
41,519.00
765.10
300.00
765.70
50.00
275.00
122.22
1,815.15
2,339.33
353.42
6,624.61
1,100.00
939.14
69.20
1,200.00
1,000.00
5,243.67
1,100.24
402.00
3,142.00
549.21
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0297523
0297524
0297525
0297526
0297527
0297528
0297529
0297530
0297531
0297532
0297533
0297534
0297535
NAME
MOSS, ROGER
MEZZINA, PATRICIA
MERCURI, DEBRA
MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC
MARTIN, CRISTI
MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES, INC
MELBOURNE INTERNAL MEDICINE
MELTON, AUSTIN
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
NEW YORK GENEALOGICAL, &
NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
0297536 ORTHOFIX
0297537 ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER OF VERO BCH
0297538 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
0297539 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
0297540 PETTY CASH
0297541 POSTMASTER
0297542 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
0297543 P B S & J
0297544 PARKS RENTAL
0297545 PAGE ONE COURT REPORTING
0297546 PRECISION CONTRACTING
0297547 PAGENET OF FLORIDA
0297548 PUTTICK ENTERPRISES
0297549 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
O 297550 PIONEER SCREEN
O 297551 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES,
0297552 PARKER, DEBBIE
0297553 PROSPER, JANET C
0297554 PROFORMA
0297555 PHIPPS, DAVID
0297556 PESHA, JESSICA
0297557 PENA, JORGE
0297558 PALM BEACH GARDENS MEDICAL
0297559 PALM BEACH COUNTYWIDE GIS
0297560 QUALITY BOOKS, INC
0297561 RADIOSHACK
0297562 RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
0297563 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
0297564 RIORDAN, MICHAEL C PSY.D.
0297565 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
0297566 REALLY GOOD STUFF
0297567 ROSATO MD, RALPH M
0297568 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS
RAPP, PAMELA
REEBOK FACTORY
RUNGE, SUZANNE
ROY, AL
RADISSON BARCELO HOTEL
RYAN, RODNEY
SHELTON, ORVAL
SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
0297579 SUN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
0297580 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
0297581 SCHOLARLY
INC
O 297569
O 297570
O 297571
0297572
0297573
0297574
0297575
0297576
0297577
0297578
DIRECT STORE
March 6, 2001
RESOURCES, INC
13
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
CHECK
AMOUNT
61.80
812.26
62.93
2,104.00
381.50
846.18
16.08
60.00
245.86
34,036.67
42.50
2,500.00
1,034.17
3,217.50
17.00
234.75
547.03
34.91
272.00
1,000.00
5,134.00
120.15
25.00
120.33
489.90
500.00
52.08
30.00
1,000.00
185.40
28.00
19.95
26.39
29.61
77.25
4,853.26
50.00
374.24
29.00
1,275.00
1,750.00
800.00
952.00
58.05
500.00
299.90
24.00
49.00
138.54
27.00
360.00
62.20
500.00
466.00
49.95
81.42
81.77
1,173.60
532.95
BK H17PG272
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0297582 STEIL, HOLLY
0297583 SHERWOOD, FRANCES G
O 297584 SAFESPACE INC
O 297585 SIGNS IN A DAY
0297586 SALEM PRESS, INC
O 297587 SKAGGS, PAUL MD
O 297588 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
O 297589 SPEEGLE CONSTRUCTION, INC
0297590 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
0297591 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO
0297592 SNOBERGER, RUTH ANN
0297593 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
O 297594 SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY EQUIP
0297595 SOUTHEAST LIBRARY BINDERY,INC
0297596 ST LUCIE COUNTY 4-H
0297597 STANBRIDGE, RUTH
0297598 7 -ELEVEN
0297599 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
0297600 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
O 297601 SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER
O 297602 SOUTHERN COMPUTER SUPPLIES INC
O 297603 SEBASTIAN CHARTER JUNIOR HIGH
O 297604 SUNCOAST COUNSELING &
0297605 SPEIRS, DONNA
0297606 STILLWAGON, JILL
O 297607 SPACE COAST PATHOLOGISTS
O 297608 STEPHEN, FENANDA
O 297609 SBA, INC
0297610 SLP INVESTMENTS INC/PERKINS
0297611 SAMARITAN CENTER
0297612 TIME LIFE BOOKS
O 297613 TITLEIST
O 297614 TRI -SURE CORPORATION
0297615 TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
O 297616 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC
O 297617 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
O 297618 TRAVEL BY PEGASUS
O 297619 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
O 297620 THYSSEN MIAMI ELEVATOR
O 297621 TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
0297622 UPSTART
0297623 ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
O 297624 UTILITY SERVICE CO, INC
0297625 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
0297626 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
O 297627 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
O 297628 UNISHIPPERS
0297629 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
O 297630 UNIVERSAL LAND TITLE
O 297631 VELDE FORD, INC
O 297632 VERO BEACH, CITY OF
0297633
0297634
0297635
0297636
0297637
0297638
0297639
0297640
0297641
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
March 6, 2001
BEACH, CITY OF
CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC
TRAVEL SERVICE, INC
BEACH, CITY OF
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
BEARING & BOLT
ORTHOPAEDICS
BEACH POWERTRAIN
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
14
81( 11 7 PG 273
CHECK
AMOUNT
44.08
15.00
2,921.39
132.00
85.75
18.00
7,052.94
500.00
1,183.95
298.85
45.44
50.00
492.00
358.59
30.00
81.00
19.68
110.00
366.30
1,710.38
4,730.00
2,778.75
1,075.00
42.00
1,032.00
19.00
25.39
500.00
50.00
5,482.44
13.97
1,386.67
242,815.56
251.34
6,861.19
25.00
621.00
272.29
1,958.00
53.05
45.56
680.63
39,912.00
13.67
5.00
3,958.20
10.14
7.19
26.34
1,002.26
53,604.02
174.20
495.15
436.50
148.43
50.00
25.00
97.56
91.00
960.09
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0297642
0297643
O 297644
0297645
O 297646
O 297647
O 297648
O 297649
O 297650
O 297651
0297652
0297653
0297654
0297655
O 297656
0297657
0297658
O 297659
O 297660
0297661
O 297662
0297663
O 297664
O 297665
0297666
O 297667
0297668
0297669
NAME
VERO/SEBASTIAN US#1 PARTNERSHP
WALGREENS PHARMACY
WALGREENS PHARMACY #03608
WGYL-FM 93.7 FM
WRIGHT, DOUGLAS M
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WELLESLEY INNS & SUITES
WOOD'N NICHOLS
WTTB AM 1490
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
WILEY, CARLENE C
WALGREEN CO
W C G, INC
WILLIAMS, LARRY ANTHONY
WALKER AVE CLUB LTD
XEROX CORPORATION
XEROX CORPORATION
YELLOW SPRING INSTRUMENT CO,
THOMAS, JAMES SR
MILLER, JOSEPH
BROOKS, THERESA
WODTKE, RUSSELL
MERCURI, DEBRA
ROYAL, THOMAS
EVERETT, MELVIN
REEDY, VALERIE
INMAN, KATHLEEN
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 22, 2001:
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
CHECK
AMOUNT
17,500.00
602.60
1,387.68
375.00
15.00
104.00
230.40
534.00
2,220.00
150.00
2,843.58
69.00
502.78
22,964.99
90.00
11,096.89
1,187.95
80.00
115.03
436.55
722.24
967.86
591.94
194.46
486.30
1,972.76
49.77
531.40
1,525,256.40
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FROM:
HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FEBRUARY 22, 2001
APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
EDWIN M. FRY, JR, FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes. all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached List of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of February 19, 2001 to February 22, 2001.
March 6, 2001
15
B;
17 FL
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0020944
0021014
0021041
0293583
0294327
0294679
0295936
0296712
0296804
0296897
0296972
0297189
0297306
0297320
0297335
O 297390
0297667
0297670
O 297671
0297672
0297673
O 297674
O 297675
0297676
0297677
0297678
O 297679
O 297680
0297681
0297682
O 297683
O 297684
O 297685
0297686
0297687
0297688
O 297689
O 297690
0297691
0297692
0297693
0297694
0297695
0297696
0297697
0297698
March 6, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved (4-0.
Commissioner Macht absent) the list of warrants issued by the
Clerk to the Board for the period February 19-22, 2001, as
requested.
NAME
THE GUARDIAN
ONSITE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
EVERETT, MELVIN
SUNTRUST BANK S FL
STEWART TITLE OF INDIAN RIVER
INTERACTIVE FITNESS TRAINERS
DELTA ORLANDO RESORT
GREENE, ROBERT E
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
REEDY, RONALD & VALERIE
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
SMYTH SYSTEMS INC
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
ABC PRINTING CO
BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
COASTAL CAD AND BLUEPRINT INC
EVERETT, MELVIN
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
ABC-CLIO INC
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
AT EASE ARMY NAVY
ACTION DIESEL INJECTION
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
ARCHIVE PUBLISHING
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
A T & T
ASHWORTH INC
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
APOLLO ENTERPRISES
ANCOR CORF INC.
ASSOCIATES, THE
ABC PRINTING CO
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
ATLANTIC PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
ANDREWS, BILLIE
BARTH CONSTRUCTION
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BKI
CHECK
DATE
2000-12-28
2001-02-02
2001-02-19
2000-11-30
2000-12-14
2000-12-21
2001-01-18
2001-01-31
2001-01-31
2001-01-31
2001-02-08
2001-02-08
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-15
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
'6G 275
CHECK
AMOUNT
. 00
. 00
493.19
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
828.10
986.00
34.13
12.67
377.00
524.45
1,283.94
532.00
434.67
98.00
834.00
45.60
42.49
44.24
58.00
4.78
1,139.52
58.00
61.00
454.51
335.70
7,310.16
35.96
22.80
50.00
9,869.70
38.62
500.00
7,284.53
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
•
CHECK
NUMBER
O 297699
O 297700
0297701
O 297702
O 297703
0297704
O 297705
O 297706
O 297707
O 297708
O 297709
0297710
0297711
0297712
O 297713
O 297714
O 297715
0297716
0297717
0297718
O 297719
0297720
O 297721
0297722
0297723
O 297724
O 297725
0297726
0297727
O 297728
O 297729
0297730
0297731
O 297732
0297733
0297734
0297735
O 297736
0297737
0297738
0297739
O 297740
0297741
O 297742
O 297743
O 297744
O 297745
O 297746
O 297747
0297748
O 297749
O 297750
O 297751
O 297752
O 297753
0297754
O 297755
O 297756
0297757
0297758
March 6, 2001
NAME
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BURGOON BERGER
BARTON, JEFFREY K
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BELLSOUTH COMMUNICATION
BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
BFI WASTE SYSTEMS
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BEAZER HOMES, INC
BREVARD ANESTHESIA SERVICES
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
BELFORD, DENNIS
BROADCASTERS GENERAL STORE
BLACKMON, SHANITA
BIOMASS PROCESSING
BEYER, DAMON J
BOLDING, AMY
BAKKEN, DAVID C MD
BRODA, JANICE C INC
BELLSOUTH
CAMERON & BARKLEY COMPANY
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
CENTRAL WINDOW OF
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
CHANDLER, PHILLIP
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
COASTAL REFINING & MARKETING
CAPP CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC
CALL ONE, INC
CLINTON ENTERPRISES INC
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF
COURT REPORTERS, INC
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
COBBLESTONE DEVELOPMENT CORP
COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC &
CHANNING CORP
CHAMBERS, JESSE LEE JR
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CIDLOWSKI, HELEN
CSR AMERICA INC
CASSADY-CARROLL INSURANCE
CLYATT, KARRICK KATHRYN
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
DAVIS, JAMES
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING &
DADE PAPER COMPANY
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
DILLARD, CASSIE
17
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
6,233.50
500.00
2,857.00
939.69
38.88
200.00
559.85
81.72
141.97
500.00
1,132.70
19,696.06
109.91
3,640.79
56.65
130,957.47
5.50
100.00
600.00
112.50
313.38
872.39
2,465.00
6,814.75
153.00
574.95
200.00
198.00
441.50
3,171.20
12,395.57
500.00
10,513.73
500.00
50.00
800.00
399.00
37.70
40.00
1,011.02
2,193.91
29.00
500.00
80.00
581.93
106.00
12,250.89
1,022.00
12,876.60
2,688.21
336.00
1,371.76
95.25
36.94
1,276.75
1,137.85
3,890.00
1,698.70
138.93
18.02
B. i PG 276
•
CHECK
NUMBER
O 297759
O 297760
O 297761
O 297762
0297763
0297764
O 297765
O 297766
O 297767
O 297768
O 297769
O 297770
O 297771
O 297772
O 297773
0297774
0297775
O 297776
0297777
O 297778
O 297779
O 297780
0297781
O 297782
0297783
0297784
0297785
0297786
O 297787
O 297788
O 297789
O 297790
O 297791
O 297792
0297793
0297794
0297795
O 297796
0297797
0297798
O 297799
0297800
O 297801
0297802
0297803
0297804
O 297805
O 297806
O 297807
0297808
O 297809
O 297810
O 297811
0297812
0297813
O 297814
0297815
0297816
NAME
DOCTORS' CLINIC
DOYLE, STEVE
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
DECIPHER INC
DARCANGELO, JEANNE
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
E G P INC
EXPEDITER INC, THE
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
EXPRESS REEL GRASSING
ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC
EQUIFAX CITY DIRECTORY
EVERGLADES FARM
EMPOWER CONSTRUCTION INC
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
FLORIDA BAR, THE
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL SELF
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
FWPCOA
FLORIDA FIRE MARSHALL'S
FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE
FLORIDA TRANSCOR, INC
FALZONE, KATHY
FLORIDA HOSPITAL
FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE
FLORIDA GAME & FISH COMMISSION
FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FLORIDA DEPT OF LABOR &
FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
FULLER, APRIL L
FATHER & SON UPHOLSTERY
FIRST CHURN OF GOD
FLORIDA SPINE INSTITUE
FLORIDA HISTORICAL LIBRARY
FOE
GALE GROUP, THE
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY
GOLDEN LAKES SOFTWARE
GORHAM, JONATHAN
GRAHAM, ALLEN
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
HARRISON UNIFORMS
HIGHSMITH, INC
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
HERITAGE BOOKS, INC
HERITAGE QUEST
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
18
3K iI7 PG 277
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,949.63
58.00
1,284.30
37.50
64.90
29.00
5,158.60
17.43
3,055.50
100.00
6,828.75
230.55
273.26
8,608.00
134.49
330.00
415.50
50.00
16,439.09
106.74
2,646.63
20.00
40.00
28.97
109.50
80.50
6,032.10
60.00
9.97
29.00
2,444.97
177.90
148.45
869.28
27,235.54
29.00
66.95
2,538.00
21,650.00
243.00
146.89
16,959.97
1,424.64
1,249.44
38.00
66.99
168.00
4,000.00
106.67
50.00
49.03
110.54
30.54
573.45
157.63
33.40
61,641.26
7,000.00
•
CHECK
NUMBER
029781
029781
029781
029782
029782
0297822
0297823
0297824
0297825
0297826
0297827
0297828
O 297829
O 297830
O 297831
O 297832
0297833
0297834
0297835
0297836
0297837
O 297838
0297839
0297840
O 297841
O 297842
0297843
0297844
O 297845
O 297846
0297847
0297848
0297849
O 297850
0297851
O 297852
O 297853
0297854
0297855
0297856
O 297857
0297858
O 297859
0297860
O 297861
0297862
0297863
0297864
0297865
0297866
O 297867
O 297868
O 297869
0297870
0297871
0297872
0297873
NAME
7 HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
8 HUNTER, TAMIKA
9 HOME DEPOT
0 HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
1 HUMPHREY, NATALIE
HICKS, BERNICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
ISIS PUBLISHING
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
IRRIGATION CONSULT UNLMTD
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE -
INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS
IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT
INDIAN RIVER HAND
JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS
J A SEXAUER INC
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
JEWETT ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
JEFFERSON. CHRISTOPHER A
JENKINS AND CHARLAND INC
JONES CHEMICALS, INC
KOMARINET2, ROBERT
KELLY TRACTOR CO
KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
KULP, WILLIAM KEVIN
KELLER, JENAE
KTA-TATOR INC
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
L B SMITH, INC
L IGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC
LEHMAN, WILLIAM
MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP
MCCOLLUM, NATHAN
MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY
MIKES GARAGE
MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO
MAGANA, IGNACIO M D
MADD
MACKSOUD, WADIH MD
MONNETT EYE & SURGERY CENTER
MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
MAURER, ERMA B, RN
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
MARC INDUSTRIES
MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
19
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,092.50
77.25
39.94
376.25
200.00
2,000.00
451.90
125.00
816.45
234.09
698.24
654.64
194.54
6.75
15.00
100.00
30.00
1,101.77
1,189.46
124,324.14
154.00
59.45
197.10
425.00
99.90
1,734.94
99.00
90.00
1,845.00
188.00
81.60
903.72
1,929.21
14.16
30.00
38.62
2,000.00
603.83
1,582.46
73.41
536.50
135.11
500.00
445.15
233.50
19.00
105.00
1,356.80
29.00
50.00
600.00
441.00
1,524.32
160.00
185.94
927.41
185.01
BK 1 I 7
( i 970
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0297874
0297875
0297876
0297877
0297878
0297879
0297880
0297881
0297882
0297883
0297884
0297885
0297886
0297887
0297888
0297889
0297890
0297891
0297892
0297893
0297894
0297895
0297896
0297897
0297898
0297899
O 297900
O 297901
0297902
O 297903
0297904
0297905
O 297906
0297907
O 297908
0297909
O 297910
O 297911
0297912
0297913
0297914
0297915
0297916
0297917
0297918
0297919
0297920 S
0297921 S
0297922 S
0297923 S
0297924 S
0297925 S
0297926 S
0297927 S
0297928 S
NAME
MITCHELL TRAINING, INC
MURPHY, DEBBIE
MARINE RESCUE CONSULTANTS
MORTON SALT
MELBOURNE INTERNAL MEDICINE
MCCULLY, WILLIAM KEITH
MALLAMS, JOHN H, PHD
MCGLUTHLIN, SHAWN
MIRACLE LACE VISOR INC, THE
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
NACVSO
NATIVE TREES
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
NU CO 2, INC
NEWCOME, DUKE
NEWSTAR MEDIA, INC
NITRO LEISURE PRODUCTS, INC
OMNIGRAPHICS, INC
ON IT'S WAY
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
ODOM, WILLIAM EVERETT
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
PETTY CASH
PORT CONSOLIDATED
PARKS RENTAL
POSTMASTER
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
PIONEER SCREEN
PANKIEWICZ-FUCHS, PATRICIA A
PENWORTHY COMPANY, THE
POWERPLAN
PESHA, JESSICA
RADIOSHACK
RIFKIN, SHELDON H PHD
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY,INC
RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
RELIABLE TRANSMISSION SERVICE
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
REXEL CONSOLIDATED
REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
SCOTTY'S, INC
SETON NAME PLATE CORP
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
EWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
HERWIN-WILLIAMS CO
IR SPEEDY #5054
OUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
T LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
UN COAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
UNRISE FORD TRACTOR &
UNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
CHOLARLy RESOURCES, INC
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
20
BE( 1I7JC279
CHECK
AMOUNT
800.00
144.00
1,125.00
1,151.26
27.55
391.81
146.30
840.00
127.38
219.46
75.00
585.00
119.22
76.58
1,294.00
8.00
162.00
118.93
136.56
878.14
42.79
46.35
43.71
192.73
1,571.53
122.17
136.00
126.00
324.00
30.00
61.10
453.05
130.20
18.02
41.78
405.00
76.43
543.87
110.06
137.60
3,354.18
13.91
358.89
18.08
289.15
205.32
45.77
834.90
202.00
550.35
250.40
69.49
441.13
347.40
714.00
• •
CHECK
NUMBER
029792
029793
029793
029793
029793
029793
029793
029793
029793
0297938
0297939
0297940
0297941
0297942
O 297943
0297944
0297945
O 297946
0297947
O 297948
0297949
O 297950
0297951
O 297952
0297953
0297954
0297955
0297956
0297957
0297958
0297959
0297960
0297961
0297962
O 297963
O 297964
O 297965
0297966
0297967
O 297968
O 297969
0297970
0297971
0297972
0297973
0297974
O 297975
0297976
O 297977
O 297978
0297979
O 297980
0297981
O 297982
O 297983
O 297984 X
O 297985 Z
0297986 R
0297987 S
0297988 C
NAME
9 SEMBLER, CHARLES W
0 SCHOOL DISTRICT OF IRC
1 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
2 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
3 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
4 SARAH BRYSON INDUSTRIES
5 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO
6 STANBRIDGE, RUTH
7 SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
SUNLAND BOOKS, INC
SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL
STAMM MANUFACTURING
S IMPLY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC
S IEGLER, JENNIFER L
SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY
SANDOVAL, ERIC S
SHERIDAN HOUSE INC.
SAFETY CHEM, INC
SLP INVESTMENTS INC/PERKINS
TARMAC AMERICA INC
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
TAYLOR & FRANCIS
THOMAS T BEELER, PUBLISHER
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
SMITH, TERRY L
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOOK CLUB
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY
TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
US POSTAL SERVICE
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
VETERAN INFORMATION SERV
VERO ORTHOPAEDICS
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
VERO BEARING & BOLT
VERO HERITAGE, INC
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
VOLUNTEER ACTION CENTER
WILLO PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC
WRIGHT, JIM
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WHITESIDE PARTS & SERVICE INC
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642
WODTKE, RUSSELL
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
W W GRAINGER INC
WILLIAMS, LARRY ANTHONY
WRITERS BOOKSTORE
EROX CORPORATION
EE MEDICAL SERVICE
OYAL, THOMAS
UNTRUST BANK S FL
AL BUILDERS
March 6, 2001
21
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
50.85
403.60
78.08
2,499.75
25.00
41.30
28.93
327.84
300.00
1,436.81
828.29
40.20
459.00
199.58
88.50
51.10
154.50
43.95
585.31
96.00
10,648.60
7,570.30
40,741.01
780.22
1,920.00
48.00
65.01
31.48
42.12
387.02
1,060.86
15,000.00
2,127.60
15,472.94
201.47
165.70
70.00
174.00
201.82
797.30
1,091.42
793.03
3,377.66
1,797.00
500.00
130.00
201.60
54.65
90.00
72.50
87,799.40
550.98
32.40
80.00
22.25
146.42
56.36
512.38
132.27
50.00
BK PG 200
CHECK
NUMBER
NAME
O 297989 HILL, CINDY
0297990 ROBB, BAYARD
O 297991 BURGOON BERGER CONST CO
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
BROOKS JR, HAROLD & BARBARA
JACOB$, STEPHANIE
PETERSON, STEPHANIE
GHO VERO BEACH INC
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
GROZA BUILDERS INC
HESLER, AMANDA L
STEPP, JOSEPH L
COVIELLO, JANE E
IRISH, GEORGE E
WILLIAMSON, NICOLE
PAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING CO
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC
CHANNING CORP XXIX
FESSLER, C DYRAL
MC LEAN, MARK D &
O 298011 EXPRESS DEALS INC
O 298012 HAFNER, TROY B
O 298013 HANSON, SUSAN J
0298014 KUNKEL, ERIC M
O 298015 MORGAN, PATRICK
0298016 DOHERTY, CONOR S
0298017 NORAIR JR, PAUL H
0298018 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION,
0298019 MUMFORD, PAUL
0298020 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES
0298021 JOHNSON, KIMBERLY D
0298022 CURTIS, BRADY J
0298023 HART, CHRISTI
0298024 STUMPF, CLIFFORD & MARY
0298025 NOEL, JAMES LARSON & JEANINE
0298026 BELLFLOWER, FRED AND
0298027 EISENHUT, JAMES P
0298028 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS
0298029 PADGETT, ROBERT
0298030 WINDSOR PROPERTIES
0298031 EMANUEL, THOMAS G
0298032 BARTH CONSTRUCTION III
0298033 LEE, ALAN AND
0298034 WOOLFORK, ROWENA
0298035 BIRON, JANE
0298036 ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES
0298037 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
0298038 BEDARD, BRIAN
0298039 HALL, RICHARD
0298040 GARCIA, FERNANDO
0298041 MALONEY, KATE K
0298042 KINGSLEY, PATRICIA
0298043 HADGEOFF, JANE
0298044 ZALEUKE, PENNY C
0298045 BONNER, THOMAS AND
0298046 SHARK MART II
0298047 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION INC
0298048 MEYER, M LEE
O 297992
O 297993
O 297994
0297995
O 297996
O 297997
O 297998
O 297999
O 298000
0298001
O 298002
O 298003
0298004
O 298005
0298006
O 298007
0298008
0298009
O 298010
FLORA
INC
INC
INC
March 6, 2001
INC
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
22
B 1 1 7 PG 2 8 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
11.00
58.38
42.09
34.07
81.49
8.25
32.72
30.68
51.94
66.01
35.46
28.54
29.17
43.43
98.63
11.32
30.31
334.04
134.64
127.95
37.11
87.22
15.10
44.64
81.14
29.45
19.47
54.26
25.44
81.23
82.39
335.44
4.47
22.71
9.17
58.90
85.43
10.50
15.88
51.55
37.30
16.12
32.52
51.65
40.73
91.05
82.96
92.03
34.39
35.86
46.19
20.07
51.44
65.45
21.03
78.76
29.35
247.71
126.35
48.22
• •
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0298049 GUZMAN, DIEGO LEO
0298050 GIBILISCO, ASSUNTA
0298051 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES
0298052 DIX, KEESHA L
O 298053 YOUNG, WILLIAM E
0298054 LYONS, LEONARD SR
0298055 ANDERSON, JAMES R
O 298056 WILLIAMS, JANIE B
0298057 KRESS, CRAIG
0298058 GARBERS, LAVERNE AND
0298059 ADAMS, JOHN C
0298060 ROSS, JEFFREY AND
0298061 DOLAN, ELIZABETH DAWN
0298062 ANDERSON, FRED
O 298063 ANDERSON, CAMELIA AND CITY OF
0298064
0298065
O 298066
O 298067
O 298068
O 298069
O 298070
O 298071
0298072
0298073
O 298074
O 298075
O 298076
O 298077
O 298078
0298079
O 298080
O 298081
O 298082
0298083
O 298084
O 298085
O 298086
O 298087
O 298088
0298089
O 298090
O 298091
O 298092
0298093
O 298094
O 298095
O 298096
O 298097
O 298098
O 298099
O 298100
O 298101
O 298102
O 298103
O 298104
O 298105
O 298106
B IEMANN, GWEN
BROXTON, LYDIA
BEUTTELL, PETER M
S ILKEN GROUP
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
BROOKHAVEN, TOWN OF
BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY
BABCOCK, DEAN
CORR, RHODA L
C P E ASSOCIATES
CAPAK, GERALD T
CARONE, PAUL
CARLUCCI, LEONARD A
DOOLITTLE,JAMES A & ASSOCIATES
DOVE, E WILSON
EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
EVANS, ALFRED
FOGERTY, GEORGE A
FRESH, DANIEL J
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC
FORD, ROBERT J
GASKILL, ROBERT
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
GRACE'S LANDING LTD
HOLM, LEO
HUNLEY, J MICHAEL
JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES
JAHOLKOWSKI, MIKE
JULIN, PAUL
JOHNSTON, PATTIE
JACKOWSKI, MICHAEL
JOHNSON, MICHELLE AND F P & L
JONES, ALPHONSO
KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA
LAWRENCE, TERRY A
LANGLEY, PHILIP G
LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
LAPPERT, ANN OR RONALD
MIXELL, LLONALD AND/OR
M 0 D INVESTMENTS
MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
March 6, 2001
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
23
CHECK
AMOUNT
29.15
113.97
209.71
31.63
58.87
12.44
57.04
51.28
33.12
130.74
69.87
67.61
68.39
239.00
11.00
317.00
224.00
285.00
627.00
281.00
324.00
96.22
836.44
316.00
251.00
3,197.00
343.00
369.00
343.00
4,676.00
271.00
931.00
400.00
300.00
233.00
774.22
85.00
331.00
286.00
9,348.00
5,480.00
494.00
535.00
3,286.00
337.00
170.00
395.00
353.00
19.00
251.00
234.00
177.00
235.00
9,754.00
234.00
301.00
827.00
203.00
BK 117 FG 2'2
CHECK
NUMBER
O 298107
0298108
O 298109
0298110
O 298111
O 298112
O 298113
0298114
0298115
0298116
O 298117
O 298118
0298119
0298120
0298121
O 298122
O 298123
0298124
O 298125
O 298126
0298127
O 298128
0298129
0298130
0298131
O 298132
0298133
0298134
0298135
O 298136
O 298137
0298138
O 298139
0298140
O 298141
O 298142
0298143
0298144
0298145
0298146
O 298147
March 6, 2001
NAME
MALGERIA, PRISCILLA
MEAD, THOMAS H OR HELEN S
NORMAN, DOUGLAS OR BARBARA
ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND
OSCEOLA COUNTY SECTION 8
OATHOUT, GENE
PALMER TRAILER PARK
P ITTMAN, CATHERINE & FLORIDA
POLLY, EMMA
P IERSON, JOHN H DBA
PALUMBO, LOUIS
PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF
PRICE, GLORIA
REAGAN, WILLIE C
RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST
RICOTTI, RICARDO
RIVER PARK PLACE
ST FRANCES MANOR
SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR
STEWART, REUBEN W
STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY
SANDY PINES
SHELTON, ROBERT L
STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR
SUNDMAN, IVAN
STIMELING, PAUL B OR MARGARET
SARTAIN, CHARLES S & TELECIA
TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING
TUMLIN, TRACY N
TOMLIN, SHARON AND CITY OF
TRIPLETT PROPERTIES, LLC
ULISKY, WILLIAM 8 OR MARLENE
VERO MOBILE HOME PARK
VERO FIRST CORPORATION
WILLIAMS, DEBRA WASHINGTON
WILLIAMS, EDITH
WESSENDORF, FRED
YORK, LILLY B
YORK, DAVID
ZANCA, LEONARD
CHECK
DATE
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
24
PG 283
CHECK
AMOUNT
419.00
281.00
357.00
525.22
304.22
331.00
267.00
34.00
805.00
627.00
343.00
405.22
246.00
507.00
290.00
317.00
4,710.00
4,022.00
318.00
302.00
455.00
505.22
4,891.00
423.00
267.00
333.00
273.00
215.00
495.00
320.00
14.00
446.00
130.00
167.00
1,562.00
68.00
270.00
408.00
433.00
378.00
588.00
947,910.68
•
7. C. Children's Services Advisor Committee 1999/2000 Annual
Report
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001 and the attached report:
February 26, 2001
Indian River County Commissioners
1840 251" Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Attached is the Children's Services Advisory Committee 1999/2000 Annual Report for
commission approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce Johnston -Carlson
Chairman Ginn questioned the listing of Kay Moran under "staff" and suggested this
matter should be deferred to the next meeting when Commissioner Macht would be present.
Commissioner Adams saw no need to defer since the Board was merely being asked
to accept the report.
Human Services Director Joyce Johnston -Carlson advised that about 3 years ago the
Hirshberg Report was funded by the Shared Services Network; the SSN director, Kay Moran,
sits at the CSAC meetings for information and input, but she is not paid staff
Chairman Ginn thought she needed to be listed elsewhere since she is not County
staff.
In response to questioning by Commissioner Adams, Ms. Johnston -Carlson further
advised that Ms. Moran coordinates the CSN and their monthly meetings. When necessary,
the CSN researches and does reports for the CSAC.
March 6, 2001
Commissioner Adams noted that Ms. Moran is listed as Shared Services Facilitator.
She saw no problem with that being in the report since it lists the people who are doing the
work.
Chairman Ginn needed further clarification, but would do that outside of the meeting.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) adopted the 1999/2000 Annual
Report of the Children's Services Advisory Committee.
7.D. Modification of Planning Division's Fee Schedule for
Concurrency Determination Application Fees
The Board reviewed a letter of February 20, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIV : O HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. eating. AICP
Community Development Di ector
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP c�'
Chief. Long -Range Planning
DATE: February 20, 2001
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO MODIFY THE PLANNING DIVISION'S FEE SCHEDULE FOR
CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION FEES
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting on March 6. 2001.
March 6, 2001
26
BKIi7pg205
•
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Currently. the planning division has a Board of County Commissioners approved fee schedule which
establishes the fees for all planning division applications. One application type in the fee schedule
is concurrency. At present, there are several categories of non -single family concurrency
applications. Each of these categories has a different fee based on the project's estimated Average
Annual Daily Vehicle Tnps (AADT). The following table identifies the current AADT based
concurrency fee amounts for conceptual and initial concurrency applications.
Net AADTs
100 or fewer AADT
Application Fee
540.00
101-999 AADT
$120.00
1.000 or more AADT
S2_00.00
Many applicants are not familiar with trip calculation methodology and find this method of
concurrency application fee determination to be confusing.
Analysis
Concurrency applications are reviewed by the traffic division. utilities department and planning
division. The amount of time that traffic engineering staff spend on reviewing concurrence
applications depends on how large a project is and how many tnps it generates. That was the reason
that the application fee was based on the number of trips generated by the project.
Staff's experience is that the concurrency application rate structure is confusing to applicants. To
calculate the number of project trips. an applicant must apply the trip rates by land use to the
project's size. Often this is done incorrectly with the result being applications that are wrong. fee
payments that are incorrect. and additional staff time needed to resolve these problems.
Staff recommends that the initial. initial/final. and conditional concurrency determination application
fee rates be revised to a 3100.00 fee regardless of the number of trips that will be generated by the
project.
On February 15. 2001. the Professional Services Advisory Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend
that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached revised planning division fee
schedule.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Professional Services Advisory Committee recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners modify the concurrency determination application fee by approving the attached
revised planning division fee schedule.
Attachment
1. Page 4 of the existing planning division fee schedule
Revised planning division fee schedule.
March 6, 2001
27
•
BK 1 7 P6 286
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) modified the concurrency
determination application fee by approving the revised planning
division fee schedule as presented in the backup, as
recommended in the memorandum.
7.E. Appointment of Adam S. Bolinger to the Land Acquisition
Advisory Committee (LAAC) to Fill Vacancy Caused by Resignation
of Bob Swift
The Board reviewed a letter of February 26, 2001:
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: February 26, 2001
Subject: Appointment to the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC)
From: Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner
At the meeting on December 5, 2000 the Board approved the resignation of Bob Swift from the
LAAC leaving a vacancy for a developer representative. I would like to appoint Adam S.
Bolinger to fill this vacancy.
Attachment
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) appointed Adam S. Bolinger to
the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee, as requested.
March 6, 2001
28
B. 117 FG 287
7. F. Out -of -County Travel for Commissioners and Staff to Attend the
2001 National Association of Telecommunications Officers and
Advisors (NATOA) Regional Workshop
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001:
Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: February 26, 2001
Subject: Out of county travel for Commissioners and staff to attend the 2001 National
Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Regional
Workshop
From. Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner
I would like permission for Commissioners and staff to attend the 2001 NATOA regional
workshop (Telecommunications Challenges The New Horizon) to be held in San Antonio, TX on
May 10-11, 2001.
Attachment
cc: Tem . Smith
Paul Bangcl
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved out -of -county travel for
Commissioners and staff to attend the 2001 NATOA regional
workshop in San Antonio, TX on May 10-11, 2001, as
requested.
March 6, 2001
BK 117 PG 2 8 8
7. G. City of Sebastian - Appointment of City Manager Terrence
Moore to the Emergency Services District Advisory Committee
(ESDAC)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001:
Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: February 26, 2001
Subject: Notification from the City of Sebastian of their Appointment to the
Emergency Services Advisory Committee (ESDAC)
From: Kimberly Massung
Executive Aide
Per the attached letter dated February 16, 2001, the City of Sebastian's representative to the
ESDAC is Mr Terrence Moore City Manager. Mr. Moore replaces Mayor Walter Barnes as
their representative effective January 24, 2001.
Attachment
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) acknowledged that City Manager
Terrence Moore is the City of Sebastian's appointment to the
ESDAC.
7.H. Bureau of Justice Assistance - Request for Grant Funds
(Replacement Bulletproof Vests)
The Board reviewedea Letter of February 23, 2001:
ijcrtff
ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
4055 41st AVENUE
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE 1561) 569-670C
March 6, 2001
30
BK117FG289
•
Honorable Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Commissioner Ginn,
February 23, 2001
Indian River County and the Sheriff's Office have the opportunity to request grant dollars for the
purchase of replacement bulletproof vests through the U S. Department of Justice, Bureau of
Justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest Partnership program The grant will reimburse up to 50°%o of
the total costs of approved body armor over a four year grant funding period. Unlike many
previous grants, the county can supplant local dollars and provide required safety equipment for
our law enforcement officers at a substantial savings to the citizens of Indian River County.
The manufacturers of bulletproof vests guarantee their product for a service life of five years.
Currently, the Sheriff's Office replaces one fifth (1/5) of the agencies vests annually through the
normal budget process. The Sheriff's Office has 190 positions for which bulletproof vest are
issued to its law enforcement deputies at a net replacement cost of $453.50 per vest for a total
agency -wide replacement cost of $86,165. By the close of the grant, the Indian River County
taxpayers could realize a potential savings of $43,08.50.
Again I reiterate, these funds can be used to supplant local funds and the reimbursement would be
paid directly to Indian River County for budgeted expenses incurred through the normal ongoing
replacement of bulletproof vests.
Attached, are documents and information required for completion of the online application
process. We request this item be placed on the agenda for the Board
of County Commissioners meeting scheduled for March 6, 2001.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Chuck Kirby at 978-6418. Thank you for your
assistance.
Sincerely,
ej-3?S—\
Roy Raymond, Sheriff
Indian River County __
RR/cck
Attachments
Copies
Fran Adams, Commissioner
Ken Macht, Commissioner
Ruth Stanbridge, Commissioner
John Tippin, Commissioner
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency •
Accredited by the Commission on -Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Incorporatt
•
March 6, 2001
31
Bi 1 1 7 FS 290
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge. the Board unanimously (4-0,
CommissionerMacht absent) approved the grant application for
the purchase of replacement bulletproof vests through the U.S.
Department ofJustice, Bureau of Justice Assistance Bulletproof
Vest Partnership Program, and authorized the Chairman to sign
same, as requested.
COPY WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD WHEN
EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7.1. Resolution No. 2001-0214 - Florida Inland Navigation District
(FIND) Grant Application - Novurania 24' Inflatable Patrol Boat for
Sheriff's Office Marine Unit
The Board reviewed a Letter of February 26, 2001:
Sjjertff
4055 41st AVENUE
ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
M[r.jEt OF rjATUD JAL SHERIFFS ASSOCJA. IOP.
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960-1808
PHONE (561) 569-6700
February 26, 2001
The Honorable Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Chairman Ginn:
March 6, 2001
32
BKII7PG29I
• •
The Indian River County Sheriffs Office is pleased to inform you of our Florida Inland
Navigation District grant application for 551,717.00. The successful award of this grant would
allow the Sheriffs Office to procure a Novurania 24 -foot rigid -hull inflatable patrol boat. The
Sheriff's Office shall provide 25% matching funds (517,239.00) from the Law Enforcement
Forfeiture Trust Fund
The Sheriff's Office Marine Unit currently conducts waterway patrols to ensure boating safety,
adherence to navigational laws, BUI enforcement, environmental protection of the Indian River
Lagoon and its endangered species, as well as providing an invaluable search and rescue
resource.
The attached document must be signed by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners
in order to officially apply for the grant award. We respectfully ask that the attached document be
placed on the consent agenda for the March 6, 2001, meeting.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Chuck Kirby at 978-6418.
Sincerely,
Roy Raymond, Sheriff
RR/cck
Attachment (1)
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies. Incorporate'.
•
Snit
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Macht
absent) adopted Resolution No. 2001-021A for assistance under
the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance
Program.
RESOLD JUN No. 2001-021A
ATTACHMENT E-6
RESOLUTION FOR ASSISTANCE
UNDER THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
W1 -AREAS, THE Indian River County Sheriff's Office is
(Name of Agency)
following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of
and the State of Florida.
March 6, 2001
interested in carrying out the
Indian River County
33
1
292
5},
Project Title IRCSO - Law Enforcement Patrol & Rescue Vessel
Total Estimated Cost $ $68,956
Brief Description of Project: Purchase of a 24 foot Novurania rigid -hull inflatable boat for law
enforcement and search & rescue operations.
AND, Florida Inland Navigation District financial assistance is required for the program
mentioned above,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Indian River County
that the project described above be authorized, (Name of Agency)
AND, be it further resolved that said Indian River County
(Name of Agency)
make application to the Florida Inland Navigation District in the amount of 75 % of the
actual cost of the project in behalf of said Indian River County
(Ncrme of Agency)
AND, be it further resolved by the Indian River County
(Name of Agency)
that it certifies to the following:
1 That it will accept the terms and conditions set forth in FIND Rule 66B-2
F.A.C. and which will be a part of the Project Agreement for any assistance awarded under
2. That it is in complete accord with the attached proposal and that it will carry out
the Program in the manner described in the proposal and any plans and specifications attached
thereto unless prior approval for any change has been received from the District.
the attached proposal.
3. That it has the ability and intention to finance its share of the cost of the project
and that the project will be operated and maintained at the expense of said
Indian River County for public use.
(Name of Agency)
4. That it will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color or
national origin in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this
proposal, and shall comply with the terms and intent of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, P. L. 88-352 (1964) and design and construct all facilities to comply fully with statutes
March 6, 2001
34
BK 117 PG 2 9 3
•
relating to accessibility by handicapped persons as well as other federal, state and local
laws, rules and requirements.
5. That it will maintain adequate financial records on the proposed project to
substantiate claims for reimbursement.
6. That it will make available to FIND if requested, a post -audit of expenses
incurred on the project prior to, or in conjunction with, request for the final 10% of the
funding agreed to by FIND.
This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and
legally adopted by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at a legal meeting
held on this 6th day of March 2001.
•.
psi
Attest
J.K. BARTON
Ct;c0'JIT COURT
Title
Form No. 90-11 (Rev. 10-14-92)
Signature
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
Title
7.J. Public Notice - TEFRA (Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act)
Hearing - Financial Responsibility for The Palms at Vero
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2001:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator
DATE: February 27, 2001
SUBJECT: Public Notice for TEFRA Hearing (Tax Equity Fiscal
Responsibility Act) Financial Responsibility for The Palms at Vero
The Palms at Vero Beach Limited Partnership would like to issue "tax exempt" Industrial
Revenue Bonds to construct an affordable 260 unit garden and townhouse rental community on
a 24 acre site near the intersection of 17th Street and Indian River Boulevard. They are
March 6, 2001
35
BK
29L:
•
requesting 51,500.000 from the local Industrial Revenue Bond allocation to be used in
conjunction with S9.951,977 requested from Florida Housing Financing Corporation. Staff has
received the Industrial Revenue Bond Application.
In order for The Palms at Vero Beach Limited Partnership to be able to issue Industrial Revenue
Bonds, Indian River County must hold a TEFRA (Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act) public
hearing. Staff had requested permission to hold a TEFRA hearing on Tuesday, December 12,
2000. The Board of County Commissioners deferred the TEFRA hearing until the planning staff
could do an affordable housing analysis. At the meeting of February 13. 2001 the planning staff
presentation showed a need for low income housing.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve holding the TEFRA Public
Hearing on Tuesday, Aprilir, 2001.
5
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved holding the TEFRA
Public Hearing on Tuesday, April 3, 2001, as recommended in
the memorandum.
7.K. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE:
SUBJECT:
THROUGH:
FROM:
February 26, 2001
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012
Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator C
Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Description and Conditions
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following:
1. At County Commission meetings on January 9, 2001 and February 13, 2001, the Board of
Commissioners approved paying for public official bonds for the Clerk of the Circuit Court and the
Tax Collector, respectively. Funding in the amount of $2,549 will be provided by General Fund
contingencies.
March 6, 2001
36
BU I i 7 PG 295
1
2 On February 13, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved adding an Assistant County Attorney
position to the budget. The attached entry appropriates the necessary funding from General Fund
contingencies.
3. On February 20, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved the purchase of chairs for E911
dispatchers at two Public Safety Answering Points. Funding in the amount of $6 589 will be
provided by E911 Surcharge revenues.
4. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission approved an increase of $300,000 to the
grant agreement for construction of the Gun Range on September 28, 2000. The attached entry
appropriates the use of these funds.
5. During FY 1999/2000, the Board of Commissioners approved a Pay Plan and Position
Classification Study at a cost of $32,000. The attached entry rolls these funds forward to the
current year.
6. On February 13, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved buying back the Humane Society
property due to contaminants from the old Gifford landfill. The total cost for this purchase is
$409,000. Funding will come from Optional Sales Tax contingencies and interest income for
$389,000 and Gas Tax for the remaining $20,000.
7 The Pleasant Ridge School is not currently connected to the water system. Connection fees
totaling $8,160 must be paid before the school can be hooked up to County water. Funding is
available from General Fund contingencies
8. The Florida Department of Labor has invoiced the County for unemployment claims in various
departments. The attached entry appropriates funding for these expenses.
9. On January 16, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved donations from the Special Law
Enforcement Trust Fund to the Children's Home Society and the Substance Abuse Council for
$5,836.89 each. At the same meeting, a contribution of $500 was approved for the Child Is Missing
program A Budget Amendment is necessary to account for these expenditures.
10. The Budget Office underestimated sick incentive for Advanced Life Support. The attached entry
appropriates funding from Emergency Service District contingencies.
11. Several projects approved for FY 1999/2000 have continued into the current year. These projects
include the Sebastian Canoe Launch, Health Building air conditioner repair, convection steamer
at the IRC Jail, Planning computer upgrades, and other Buildings & Grounds projects. The
attached entry appropriates the necessary funding.
12 Indian River County has qualified for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management
Administration (FEMA) to rebuild dunes damaged by Hurricanes Irene and Floyd. FEMA Disaster
Relief Funding Agreement No. 00 -RM -1040-01-004 provides 75% of the $991,069 project costs.
The state provides a match of 12 5% with the remainder coming from County sources (Beach
Restoration Fund). A budget amendment is necessary to account for these funds.
13. Special assessment revenues have decreased over the last couple years. Additional transfers from
the General Fund and Municipal Service Taxing Unit (M.S.T.U.) are necessary to provide funding
for transportation operations The attached entry makes the necessary adjustment. Funding will
come from General Fund and M.S.T.U. contingencies.
14. Indian River County libraries have received a total of $6,539 in donations. Additionally, the State
Aid to Libraries award exceed the amount budgeted by $12,711. The attached entry appropriates
the use of these funds.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
March 6, 2001
37
1
Ski i sv 296
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0.
Commissioner Macht absent) approved miscellaneous budget
amendment 012, as recommended in the memorandum.
TO: Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT. 012
of County Commissioners
DATE February 26, 2001
Entry
Number
Fund/Department/
Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Board of
Commissioners/ Other Professional
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for
Contingencies
001-101-511-033.19
001-199-581-099.91
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/
Regular Salaries
GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/
Social Security Matching
GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/
Retirement Contnbution
GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/
Health Insurance
GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/
Worker s Compensation
001-102-512-011.12
$28,582
001-102-512-012.11
001-102-512-012.12
001-102-512-012 13
001-102-512-012 14
001-102-512-012.17
001-102-512-035.42
001-102-512-035.11
001-102-512-034.02
GENERAL FUND/ County Attorney/
Computer Workstation
001-102-512-066.47
001-102-512-066.41
001-199-581-099.91
March 6, 2001
$39,398
•
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
BUDGET AMENDMENT. 012
DATE February 26, 2001
6.
Professional Services
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for
Contingencies
REVENUES
001-203-513-033.49
001-199-581-099.91
$32,000
$0
$0
$32,000
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Interest
Earnings
SECONDARY ROAD CONST./
Interest Earnings
315-000-361-010.00
109-000-361
-015.00
$85,532
$20,000
$0
$0
EXPENSES
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Humane
Society Purchase
315-220-562-066.21
$354,000
$0
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Lift Station
Construction
315-220-562-066.39
$35,000
$0
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Reserve
for Contingencies
315-199-581
-099.91
$0
$303,468
SECONDARY ROAD CONST./
Road Paving
109-214-541-066.31
$20,000
$0
March 6, 2001
39
BR F' X 7 9 8
•
Entry
Number
Fund/Department/
Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
3.
REVENUES
E911 SURCHARGE FUND/ Wireless
Phone E911 Fees
120-000-335-220.00
$6,589
$0
EXPENSES
E911 SURCHARGE FUND/
Operating Supplies
120-133-519-035.29
$6,589
$0
4.
REVENUES
GUN RANGE CONSTRUCTION
FUND/ FFWCC Agreement
312-000-347-050.00
$300,000
$0
EXPENSES
GUN RANGE CONSTRUCTION
FUND/ Construction In Progress
312-108-575-066.51
$300,000
$0
5.
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Personnel/ Other
6.
Professional Services
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for
Contingencies
REVENUES
001-203-513-033.49
001-199-581-099.91
$32,000
$0
$0
$32,000
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Interest
Earnings
SECONDARY ROAD CONST./
Interest Earnings
315-000-361-010.00
109-000-361
-015.00
$85,532
$20,000
$0
$0
EXPENSES
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Humane
Society Purchase
315-220-562-066.21
$354,000
$0
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Lift Station
Construction
315-220-562-066.39
$35,000
$0
OPTIONAL SALES TAX/ Reserve
for Contingencies
315-199-581
-099.91
$0
$303,468
SECONDARY ROAD CONST./
Road Paving
109-214-541-066.31
$20,000
$0
March 6, 2001
39
BR F' X 7 9 8
•
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Entry
Number
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 012
DATE: February 26, 2001
Fund/Department/
Account Name
Account Number I Increase 1 Decrease
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Buildings &
Grounds/ Water Connection Fees 001-220-519-041.24 $8,160 $0
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for
Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91 I $0 I $8,160
REVENUES
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
DISTRICT/ Interest Earnings 411-000-361-010.00 $3,614
$0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Clerk of the
Circuit Court/ Unemployment
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
DISTRICT/ Landfill/ Unemployment 1411-217-534-012.15 $3,614
$0
001-300-513-01215 I $2,934 $0
001-199-581-099.91 I $0 I $2,934
REVENUES
SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
TRUST FUND/ Confiscated Property 112-000-351-020.00 $12,174
$0
EXPENSES
SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
TRUST FUND/ Law Enforcement
112-600-586-099.04 I $12,174 I $0
10. EXPENSES
EMERGENCY SERVICES
DISTRICT/ ALS/ Sick Incentive 114-253-526-011.15 $7,000
$0
EMERGENCY SERVICES
DISTRICT/ ALS/ Contingencies 114-253-526-099.91 $0 $7,000
March 6, 2001
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E Brown
Budget Manager
BUDGET AMENDMENT 012
DATE February 26, 2001
March 6, 2001
BK 1! 1 PC 300
Entry
Number
Fund/Department/
Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
11.
REVENUES
FLORIDA BOATING IMPROV.
FUND/ Boating Grant
133-000-334-039.00
$90,000
$0
FLORIDA BOATING IMPROV.
FUND/ Cash Forward
133-000-389-040.00
$7,717
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Reimbursements -
Health Department A/C
001-000-369 040.00
$40,000
$0
EXPENSES
FLORIDA BOATING IMPROV.
FUND/ Sebastian Canoe Launch
133-210-572-068.25
$97,717
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Buildings &
Grounds/ Air Conditioning - Health
001-220-519-041.23
$61.269
$0
GENERAL FUND/ Buildings &
Grounds/ Other Equipment
001-220-519-066.49
$29,244
GENERAL FUND/ Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$50,513
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING
UNIT/ Planning/ EDP Equipment
004-205-515-066.47
$3,222
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING
UNIT/ Reserve for Contingencies
044-199-581-099.91
$0
$3.222
12.
REVENUES
BEACH RESTORATION FUND/
FEMA Disaster Relief
128-000-331-058.00
$743,301
$0
BEACH REST./ State Match
128-000-334-033.00
$123,884
$0
BEACH REST./ Cash Forward
128-000-389-040.00
$123,884
$0
EXPENSES
BEACH REST./ Dune Restoration
128-144-572-066.14
$991,069
$0
March 6, 2001
BK 1! 1 PC 300
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Entry
Number
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 012
DATE: February 26, 2001
Account Number
13. REVENUES
Increase Decrease
TRANSPORTATION/ Transfers In 111-000-381-020.00
TRANSPORTATION/ Capital
Improvement Assessments
$150,000 1 $0
111-000-363-110.00
EXPENSES
$0 $150,000
GENERAL FUND/ Transfers Out 1001-199-581-099.21
GENERAL FUND/ Contingencies 1001-199-581-099.91
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING
UNIT/ Transfers Out
$75,000 1 $0
$75,000
004-199-581-099.21
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING
UNIT/ Reserve for Contingencies 004-199-581-099.91
$75,000 1 $0
$75,000
14. J REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Library State Aid 001-000-334-710.00
GENERAL FUND/ Donations - North
County Library
001-000-366-100.00
001-000-366-095.00
$12,711
EXPENSES
001-112-571-035.48
001-112-571-066.47
001-109-571-035.13
001-109-571-035.41
001-109-571-035.48
$5,650
001-109-571-038.14
001-109-571-038.19
001-109-571-066.47
$2.100
March 6, 2001
42
B;KII7FG30I
•
7.L. Resolution No. 2001-022 - Rex and Nancy Keiser - Request for
Release of Easement at 3425 65th Avenue (Lot 34, Oak Chase
Subdivision Phase I)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 13, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Ro.ert M. Keatm_.. ICP
Community Development Di ector
THROUGH: Roland M. DeBloisois. AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
& Code Enforcement
FROM: Kelly Zedek
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE: 02/13/01
RE
•
REX & NANCY KEISER REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT AT
3425 65TH AVENUE (LOT 34, OAK CHASE SUBDIVISION PHASE I)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 6, 2001.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County has been petitioned by Nancy and Rex Keiser. owners of a lot at 3425 65th Avenue.
for release of a five foot portion of a fifteen foot drainage and utility easement. The purpose of the
easement release request is for the construction of a pool and deck five feet into the fifteen (15)
foot utility and drainage easement (see attached map).
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The request has been reviewed by Bell South Communications: Florida Power & Light Corporation:
T C.I. Cable Corporation: the Indian River County Utilities Department: the County Road & Bridge
and Engineering Divisions: and the County surveyor. None of the utility providers or reviewing
agencies expressed an objection to the requested release of easement. Therefore. it is staff s
position that the requested easement release would have no adverse impact to utilities being
supplied to the subject properties or to other properties.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board. through adoption of the attached resolution. release the drainage
and utility easement, as more particularly described in said resolution.
March 6, 2001
43
BR
Pb 1'302
•
ATTACHMENTS
Proposed County Resolution Abandoning Easement
Map(s) depicting easement proposed for release
CY
� \ 6.
Planning Dept.
H�>
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) adopted Resolution No. 2001-022
releasing a portion of an easement on Lot 34, Oak Chase
Subdivision Phase I.
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 022
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA,
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING
A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT ON LOT 34, OAK CHASE SUBDIVISION
PHASE I
WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in a drainage and utility easement on Lot
34, Oak Chase Subdivision Phase I; and
WHEREAS, the retention of a portion of the easement, as described below, serves no public
purpose,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida that:
This release of easement is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida whose mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, Grantor, to
REX O. KEISER & NANCY S. KEISER
5845 40TH LN
VERO BEACH, FL 32966
their successors in interest, heirs and assigns, as Grantee, as follows:
Indian River County does hereby release and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may
have in the following described easement(s):
the east five feet of the west fifteen foot rear yard drainage and utility easement of Lot 34,
less and except the south ten feet thereof Oak Chase Subdivision Phase I, according to the plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 77 of the Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida
March 6, 2001
44
BP( 117 PG 303
Cil
CO
"N.J
01
o••
•
t••
0
THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Stanbri dgP , and adopted on the
2001, by the following vote:
by Commissioner
Marrh
March 6, 2001
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED $ '70
NOTES
JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Aye
Aye
Absent
Aye
Aye
Adams
day of
6th
,seconded
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 6th day of
March ,2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
•
Caroline DChairma
Attested By: et z -
Deputy Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 6th day of March ,
2001, by CAROLINE D. GINN, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, and by PA IRICIA M. RIDGE LY Deputy Clerk for JEFFREY K.
BARTON, Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County Florida, who are
personally known to me.
NOTARY PUBLIC
•
Printed Name • Kimberly F Ma ung
Commission No.: CCA55436
Commission Expiration: Jul y 15 , 2003
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
Q/ (
Wi Ilam G. Collins 11
Deputy County Attorney
ease.bccdoc
prof/apl.no. 2000120059/25763
45
•
Kimberly E Massung
MY COMMISSION ar CC855436 EXPIRES
July 15, 2003
BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INC
•
COCZed98£ 1 uo
UNPLATTED ACREAGE
z
PROPOSED POOL
AND DECK AREA
March 6, 2001
•
7. M. Decision of Appellate Panel - Brown v Indian River County
- Boston Homes, Inc. (d/b/a Orchid Dunes of Vero Beach) - Case No.
00 -259 -CA -20
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 28, 2001:
To: Board of County Commissioners
From. Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney Ali) 212111
Re: Steven Brown and Linda Brown v. Indian River County, a political subdivision
of the State of Florida; and Boston Homes, Inc., (d/b/a Orchid Dunes of Vero
Beach); Case No. 00 -259 -CA -20, Appellate Division, Circuit Court.
Nineteenth Judicial Circuit
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners not request rehearing
and not appeal the decision of the appellate panel in the case of Steven Brown and Linda
Brown v. Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida: and Boston
Homes. Inc., (d/b/a Orchid Dunes of Vero Beach); Case No. 00 -259 -CA -20, Appellate
Division, Circuit Court, Nineteenth Judicial Circuit
Discussion:
Enclosed is a copy of the court opinion in the above -referenced appeal. The court
ruled that, inasmuch as the petitioners (the Browns) were not notified of the March 21
2000, meeting at which the Board of County Commissioners reversed its previous decision
and approved Boston Homes, Inc.'s, site plan application, they were denied due process.
The court quashed the Board's decision and remanded the matter "to the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County for action, if any, that the Commission deems
proper."
The sole question for the Board's consideration at this time, without considering the
merits of the Browns' appeal to the Board, is whether the Board should request rehearing
or appeal the court's decision. It is my recommendation that the Board not request
rehearing and not appeal the court's decision because the notice defect may be easily
cured and the Board is free to consider the matter again (assuming subsequent site plans
have not superseded the subject site plan and rendered this matter moot) with notice to
all parties.
PGB
Enclosure
cc: Robert M. Keating, AICP, Community Development Director
March 6, 2001
47
BK I 1 ; PG 306
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) took no action on the above
matter.
7.N. Hobart Park Fairgrounds - Sign/Plaque in Honor of Wilbour D.
"Zip" Tripp, Jr. Founder of the Firefighters Indian River County
Fair
The Board reviewed a Memorandum:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Fran B. Adams
RE• Fair
I hereby request that the Commission approve the placement of a sign/plaque at
the Hobart Park Fairground that acknowledges the founding of the Indian River County
Fair by Wilbour D. "Zip" Tripp, Jr. The requested signage is attached. The location of
the sign will be in the Fairgrounds and will be freestanding. Staff, Joe Earman and
myself will make an on-site determination for a suitable location. We will plan a small
unveiling during the Fair.
Wilbour D. "Zip" Tripp, Jr. founded the Firefighters Indian River County
Fair in 1980 at the Vero Beach Municipal Airport. In 1985 the Fair moved to
these Fairgrounds "Zip' managed the Fair until 1988. His enthusiasm and
vision are still evident in this community he loved and served for 28 years
"He is a firefighter "
March 6, 2001
6K 1174PG 3 07
• •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved the placement of a
sign/plaque at the Hobart Park Fairgrounds that acknowledges
the founding of the Firefighters Indian River County Fair by
Wilbour D "Zip" Tripp, Jr , as requested and set out in the
above memorandum.
7.0. Local Option Gas Tax - Schedule Public Hearing
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 22, 2001:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: LCC. William G. Collins II — Deputy County Attorney
DATE: February 22, 2001
SUBJECT: Local Option Gas Tax, Indian River County Code Chapter 209
On August 22, 2000, the Board held the hearing required by Section 209.04 of
the County Code to review the method of distribution of the local option gas tax.
Concerns were raised by the City of Sebastian regarding requirements for annual
recalculation and distribution of the local option gas tax proceeds. County staff
met with City staff on October 13, 2000 and agreed that it would be appropriate
to bring forward an ordinance amendment that accelerated some time frames for
data provision, certification to the Department of Revenue and distribution of
proceeds.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the County Attomey's Office to advertise a public hearing to be held on
March 20, 2001 to address possible amendments to Chapter 209, the Local
Option Gas Tax Ordinance.
WGC/nhm
March 6, 2001
49
B f'C 3 0 8
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) authorized the County Attorney's
Office to advertise a public hearing to be held on March 20,
2001 to address possible amendments to Chapter 209, the Local
Option Gas Tax Ordinance.
7.P. Costs for 2000 County Tax Deed Applications
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 19,2001:
TO:
FROM:
Board of County Commissioners
Lea R. Keller, CLA, Legal Assistant
THROUGHLt" Villiam G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney
DATE: February 19, 2001
SUBJECT: Costs for 2000 County Tax Deed Applications
Discussion:
At its July 18, 2000, meeting, the Board of County Commissioners approved the County
making application for tax deeds on eleven parcels of the 69 that were eligible for tax
deed applications.
In connection with this, on February 16, 2001, the Clerk notified us that $2,013.36 is due
to the Clerk for costs of holding the actual sales, publications, mailings and/or Sheriffs
notices (as itemized on the attached applications for the seven parcels on which taxes
remain unpaid)
Recommendation:
Approve and authorize the payment of $2,013.36 to the Clerk.
/Ik
Attachments
March 6, 2001
50
BK 1 17 G 309
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the
Board
unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved payment to the Clerk of
the Court in the amount of $2,013.36 for costs related to 2000
County Tax Deed Applications, as recommended in the
memorandum.
7.Q. Bid Award #3033 - Westwood Subdivision Water Assessment
Project - Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 14, 2001:
Date: February 14, 2001
To: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMJSSIONERS
Through: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Donald Hubbs, P.E. , Director of Utility Se?y
Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director
From. Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager,ent_ /1 g—
Subject: Approval of Bid Award
Bid # 3033 Westwood Subdivision Water Assessment Project
Utilities Department Project # UW -00 -11 -DS
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
This is an approved waterline extension assessment project approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on 12/5/00. It consists of approximately 1,040 lineal feet of six-inch PVC
waterline. The project is located in Westwood Subdivision along
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Plans Requested by:
Replies:
March 6, 2001
5th Street S.W.
January 17, 2001 at 2:00 P.M.
December 22 & 29, 2000
One Hundred Sixty Two (162) Vendors
Nine (9) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
51
BR ' s 7 PG 3 I 0
•
BID TABULATION
VENDOR
BID TOTAL
Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc.
Vero Beach, FL
$40,210.50
Tri -Sure Corporation
Auburndale, FL
$43,450.00
Jobear Inc.
Palm Bay, FL $56,773.10
RECOMMENDED BID AWARD AMOUNT:
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
SOURCE OF FUNDS. Westwood Subdivision Water Assessment Project
473-000-169-389.00
$40,210.50
$42,435.25
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc. as the lowest
most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to
Bid.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) awarded Bid #3033 to Treasure
Coast Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $40,210.50, as
recommended in the memorandum.
PROJECT BOOKLET IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.R. Bid Award #3045 - Anita Park Subdivision Water Assessment
Project - Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 14, 2001:
March 6, 2001
52
BK 1 1 7 PG 3 1 1
•
Date: February 14, 2001
To: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Through: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Donald Hubbs P E , Director of Utility Services
Fi
Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director '' "
From. Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager Jtanc. A
Subject: Approval of Bid Award
Bid Award: IRC # 3045 Anita Park Subdivision Water Assessment Project
Utilities Department Project # UW -00 -08 -DS
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
This is an approved waterline extension assessment project approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on 12/5/00. It consists of approximately 2,535 lineal feet of six-inch PVC
waterline. The project is located in the Anita Park Subdivision along 37th Street.
Bid Opening Date: January 17, 2001 at 2:00 P.M.
Advertising Dates: December 22 & 29, 2000
DemandStar Broadcast to: One Hundred Sixty Three (163) Vendors
Plans Requested By: Nine (9) Vendors
Replies: Three (3) Vendors
BID TABULATION
VENDOR
Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc.
Vero Beach, FL
Tri -Sure Corporation
IAuburndale, FL
Jobear, Inc.
Palm Bay, FL
BID TOTAL
$75,982
22
$76,437.08
$85,335.00
RECOMMENDED BID AWARD AMOUNT:
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
SOURCE OF FUNDS
$75,982.22
$89,009 00
Anita Park Water Assessment Project
473-000-169-487.00
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Treasure Coast Contracting, Inc. as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
March 6, 2001
53
BK1I7PG312
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) awarded Bid #3045 to Treasure
Coast Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $75,982.22, as
recommended in the memorandum.
PROJECT BOOKLET IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.S. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for River Bend Golf
Club Planned Development (Shopco Advisory Corp.)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 23, 2001:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P E , Public Works Director CONSENT AGENDA
AND
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Enginee
FROM: David B. Cox, P.E., Civil Engineer/
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for River Bend Golf
Club Planned Development
REFERENCE: PD -01-02-07 / LDP Application No. 99080024-25913
DATE: February 23, 2001
DFSCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc., on behalf of Shopco Advisory Corporation, the developer of
River Bend Golf Club is requesting a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement of Section
930.07(2)(d) of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance. The project is located
on the west bank of the Indian River Lagoon between 63rd Street and the IRFWCD North Relief
Canal. The site is located in special flood hazard area Zone AE with base flood elevations of 7 8,
and 9 feet N.G.V.D. The ten year still water elevation is 4.7 feet. The proposed displacement of the
floodplain below 4.7 feet for which the waiver is requested is 72.91 acre feet or 117,628 cubic yards
as indicated in the attached letter from the applicant's engineer dated February 21, 2001.
AI TFRNATTVFS ANDANAJ YSTS
The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided in Section 930.07(2)(d)1. of being
situated in an estuarine environment within the 100 year floodplain along the Indian River and in
staff's opinion it appears that all other Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance
March 6, 2001
54
BK 117PG313
•
requirements can be met without adverse impact on other lands in the estuanne environment.
Granting such a waiver is not inconsistent with the regulations of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency set out as 44CFR, the National Flood Insurance Program Regulations.
A separate request for a Land Development Permit has been received by the Public Works
Department.
Altemati-ye Np 1
Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request.
Alternative No "'
Deny the waiver request and require re -design to accomplish an on-site balance of cut and fill.
RFCOMMFNT)ATJONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
ATT ACHMFNTS
1. Letter from Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc. dated February 21, 2001.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved the cut and fill balance
waiver request for River Bend Golf Club Planned Development,
as recommended in the memorandum. (Alternative No. 1.)
7. T. Bid #3041 Emergency Dune Restoration - Change Order No.
1 - Ranger Construction Industries. Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 23, 2001:
TO:
James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Jonathan C. Gorham,Ph.D J C G
Environmental Analyst
March 6, 2001
55
BX I PG 3 14
•
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 -
Ranger Construction Industries, Inc.
DATE: February 23, 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Indian River County has contracted with Ranger Construction
Industries to perform emergency dune restoration under Indian River
County bid No. 3041. Change Order No. 1 specifies a sand source for
the work at Humiston and Conn beaches that staff feels is more
suitable for heavily visited public beaches. The change order also
deletes item nine in the contract, the delivery of beach sand for
the City of Vero Beach, at the city's request. The net result of
these changes reduces the contract amount with Ranger Construction
Industries by $19,735.00.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends the approval of change order No. 1 to the
contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. Funding to be
from Beach Preservation Fund 128-144-572.
ATTAamamT
Change Order No. 1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved change order No. 1 to
the contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. for a net
reduction in the contract in the amount of $19,735.00, as
recommended in the memorandum.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. U. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 28, 2001:
March 6, 2001
56
B, 1 17 PG 315
•
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of County Commissioners
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney 'pth 4112 (11
February 28, 2001
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment
weeks of January 22, 2001 through February 19, 2001. Listed below are
each court -related cost.
Vendor:
Kevin MacWilliam, Esq.
Patricia B. Held
American Reporting
Patricia B. Held
Barbara G. Schopp
Celeste L. Hartsfield
Cristi Martin
Cristi Martin
Patricia B. Martin
American Reporting
American Reporting
Patricia B. Held
Donna Speirs
Holiday Inn Express
Travel by Pegasus
Travel by Pegasus
Michael C. Riordan, Psy.D.
Suncoast Counseling
Unishippers
Investigative Support Specialist
London Graphics
London Graphics
Sheldon H. Rifkin, Ph.D.
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
Sheila I. Flinn
Donna Speirs
Sheila I. Flinn
Janet C. Prosper
Cristi Martin
Shirley E. Corbin
Elisa LesCamela
Cristi Martin
Karen K. Hartsfield
Cristi Martin
Janet C. Prosper
Shirley E. Corbin
Elisa LesCamela
Shirley E. Corbin
Elisa LesCamela
Cristi Martin
Patricia B. Held
Hammond & Smith, P.A.
Donna Speirs
Suncoast Counseling
Janet C. Prosper
Janet C. Prosper
Donna Speirs
Karen K. Hartsfield
Patricia B. Held
Total
March 6, 2001
Payment type:
Indigent Dependency Case
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Witness Coordination
Witness Coordination
Witness Coordination
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Evaluation
State Attorney Costs
Public Defender Costs
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Clinical Evaluation
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Indigent Dependency Cases (14)
Transcription
Clinical Evaluation
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
57
to the following vendors for the
the vendors and the amount of
Amount:
1868.66
171.50
92.00
273.00
189.00
133.00
17.50
105.00
122.50
609.00
238.00
14.00
42.00
79.00
310.50
310.50
800.00
537.50
10.14
800.00
363.52
593.29
675.00
98.00
126.00
199.50
87.50
42.00
10.50
28.00
66.50
465.50
35.00
59.50
73.50
164.50
66.50
91.00
45.50
84.00
45.50
91.00
395.50
13.300.00
112.00
562.50
150.50
140.00
80.50
56.00
73.50
$25,104.61
6'E 1i 7 PG 316
•
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
7. V. Vineyard Development Corporation - Request for Final Plat
Approval for The Vineyard Subdivision
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 14, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
•
HE
•
1
CONCURRENCE:
' .. ert M.' eating, AI
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Mark Zans r'
Planner, Current Development
•
DATE: February 14. 2001
SUBJECT: Vineyard Development Corporation Request for Final Plat Approval for The
Vineyard Subdivision
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 6, 2001.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The Vineyard Subdivision is a 59 lot subdivision of a 28.3 acre parcel that is located on the east side
of 43rd Avenue, south of 1' Street S.W. and immediately north of the South Relief Canal. The
property is zoned RS -6 ( Residential Single-family up to 6 units/acre) and has an L-2 (Low Density
2 up to 6 units / acre) land use designation. The density of the subdivision is 2.1 units/acre.
On July 13, 2000 . the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat approval for The
Vineyard Subdivision The developer, Vineyard Development Corporation, subsequently obtained
a land development permit and has completed some of the construction of the required subdivision
improvements. The developer is now requesting final plat approval and has submitted the following:
1. A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and
2. A cost estimate for the remaining required improvements, and
3. A contract for construction of remaining required improvements.
March 6, 2001
58
BK 1 1 7 PG 3 1 7
•
ANA-:
Some of the subdivision improvements have been completed, and the developer proposes to bond -
out tor construction of thg remaining required improvements to proceed with final plat approval.
The format of the financial security has been approved by the County Attorney's Office, and unit
costs for construction items have been approved by Public Works, Utility Services, and Planning
Division. The developer has also submitted a copy of the Contract for Constriction of Required
Improvements. Al] subdivision improvements are pnvately dedicated with the exception of the
utility system, which will be separately warranted through the Department of Utility Services
Based on a submission of the previously referenced contract and security, all requirements of final
plat approval are satisfied.
RFCOMMFNDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final plat approval for The
Vineyard Subdivision, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Contract for Construction,
ATTAC IIM NTS:
1. Application
Location Map
Final Plat
4. Copy of Contract
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) granted final plat approval for The
Vineyard Subdivision and authorized the Chairman to sign the
Contract for Construction, as recommended in the
memorandum.
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION
PHASE III -B
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001:
March 6, 2001
59
Sri PG 318
•
DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SER)
21
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST:. ��j��
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF A •�*II NT PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT:
SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -B
RESOLUTION III — PUBLIC HEARING
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO UW -97 -17 -DS
•
BACKGROUND
On February 13, 2001, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolutions
(Resolution 1) and 2001-017 (Resolution II), which contained the preliminary
d the
date of the public hearing for the subject project Property 200] 016
dateReso the phe was published rhe inthe PRESS JO rt owners have been notified of he public hearingtbyemail.
and copy of Implementation -Attachment -1) URNAL on February 19, 2001. (See attached agenda item
Construction of the Phase III -A project area is underway and should be completed by August 2001. Design of the
water distribution system has been completed by staff. We are now ready to proceed with Phase III -B.
ANALYSIS
On February 26, 2001 at 7:00 p.m., an informational meeting was held, in the North County Library, for the benefit of
the property owners. Within the Phase III -B project area. which is located East of Laconia Street & West of
Shakespeare Street, between Crystal Mist & Lanfair Avenue's there are 527 lots and tracts, and approximately 230
homes, to benefit from this project. Typical platted lot sizes are 25 acre, plus or minus.
More effective management of project construction, inspections, cash flows, and interaction with property owners projects This may enable more utility
is being accomplished by having divided Phases II and III into smaller rojects
construction contractors to bid on these projects possibly making the bid process more competitive. The attached
map displays the area to benefit from the assessment projects, as divided into pans A, B, C, D & E, for Phase III
(Attachment -3). The City of Sebastian is waiting for the completion of the water line installation in order to
complete road & drainage improvements and comply with bonding requirements.
March 6, 2001
60
BKII7PG3I9
Project No.
Lots
Parcel I.D.
Nos./
Homes
III -A UW -97 -16 -DS
III -B UW -97 -17 -DS
III -C UW -97 -18 -DS
III -D UW -97 -19 -DS
III -E UW -97 -20 -DS
857
527
900
698
735
Total 13,717
769 / 384
458 / 230
Locations
ALL OF PHASE III IS SOUTH OF CR 512 &
SOUTHWEST OF BARBER STREET
South of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Dnve
along the South & West
East of Laconia St.& West of Shakespear St..
Between Crystal Mist & Lanfair Ave's
Between Laconia & Barber St's , between Bayfront
Terrace and Rolling Hills (Lansdowne)
East of Laconia St. between Clearmont & Capon
Streets.
West of Laconia St, between Grariduer & Gladiola
Avenue's
3,359 /1,524 South of CR 512 and SW of Barber Street
822 / 402
639 / 232
654 / 276
A summary assessment roll for Phase III -B is attached (Attachment -4). The full assessment roll is on file in the
commission office. This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water
line route. Financing will be from the assessment fund 473, account number 473-000-169-489. If needed inter -
fund borrowing will be available from the capacity fee fund 472. The estimated project cost and amount to be
assessed for Phase III -B is $ 1,335,742.80 (rounded) (Attachment -5). The estimated cost per square foot is
$0.242354 (rounded). The actual assessed cost, as with any project will be determined based on actual competitive
bid prices.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners open the
March 6, 2001 public hearing, and continue the public heanng to be held in the Sebastian City Council Chambers,
located at 1225 Main St, Sebastian, Fl, on March 20, 2001 at 7:00 p m , and at said meeting approve the attached
Resolution III, which affirms the preliminary assessment on the subject project.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
I -February 6, 2001 BCC Implementation 4 -Summary assessment roll
2 -Map of Phase III -B 5 -Estimated Project cost
3 -Map of Project area
The Chairman opened the public hearing and announced that this public hearing will
be continued to March 20, 2001, at 7 p.m. in Sebastian. She asked if anyone wished to be
heard in this matter at this time. There were no speakers.
The Chairman asked for direction from Deputy County Attorney Will Collins, who
advised the Board should move to continue the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner
Macht absent) continued the public hearing to March 20th at 7
p.m. at the Sebastian City Council Chambers.
March 6, 2001
61
BK PC 320
•
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 34TH AVENUE SW, 35TH AVENUE SW AND
INTERSECTING STREETS IN GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION -
DECISION TO HOLD A WORKSHOP ON PAVING PROJECTS
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2001:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
James Chandler, County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Direct
AND
Chnstopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engineer
Michelle A. Gentile, C.E.T., Civil Engineer
t/
Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage Improvements to 34th Avenue SW, 35th
Avenue SW and Intersecting Streets in Grovenor Estates Subdivision
IRC Project No. 9918
DATE: February 27, 2001
DFSCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On February 13, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 2001-014
providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to 34th Avenue SW, 35`'' Avenue SW and
Intersecting Streets in Grovenor Estates Subdivision. A petition was received from the property
owners on this road. Sixty (60) property owners out of mnety (90) property owners signed the
petition making it 67% in favor of having these roads paved.
On February 13, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution 2001-015
setting the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the
assessment against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for March 6, 2001.
RECOMMFNDATION
Initially, the Providing Resolution contained some offsite drainage improvements that have been
considered to be non -applicable Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners move to
approve the assessment roll, and confirming resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the
March 6, 2001 Public Hearing. Revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded
to Chairman of the Board for signature. The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are available for
viewing in the Board of County Commissioner's office.
March 6, 2001 -
62
BK 1 1 7 PC 32 1
•
•
ALEACEMEhas
1) Confirming Resolution
2) Assessment Roll and Cost Estimate
3) Assessment Map
4) Copy of typical letter sent to property owners
5) Copy of Publication
Public Works Director James W. Davis advised that initially the County had received
a valid petition which 60 of the 90 owners had signed in favor of this project. He then
explained the increased cost of asphalt which resulted in a significant increase in the cost to
owners. Staff had met the previous week with the property owners and there was great
concern about the cost. He had just received a petition signed by 33 of the owners who are
opposed to the project especially since they have been assessed recently for a water project.
(Clerk's Note: Also on file with the backup is a letter from another property owner opposed
to the project.) Staff has looked at ways to reduce the assessments, but cannot avoid the fact
that costs have increased. He concluded by recommending that the Board not move the
project forward today, but authorize staff to meet with the property owners in the future, see
if staff can get the cost down, and see if they can bring in a project that is amenable to the
majority of the property owners since many now feel that it is not cost-effective for them to
proceed.
Commissioner Adams understood that petition paving requests are coming in slower
for several reasons, including the costs. When the County undertakes one of these projects
It drags on for so long that the people get discouraged. She suggested that the County look
at '`packaging" these road projects. She also suggested setting a goal to try to get more of
these roads paved. She suspected increased costs have a lot to do with stormwater runoff and
not just the cost of asphalt. She suggested the County look at the alternative paving we have
been using, try to get that refined and get more accomplished. She pointed out that the
grading of the roads is just like cleaning a house, it is never ending.
March 6, 2001
63
BK 1 + D= 322
Director Davis advised that road costs even in the private sector are resulting in an
increase for lots in newly developed areas.
Commissioner Tippin liked Commissioner Adams' suggestion because he had never
gotten as many phone calls from people who are upset with this project. Since so many
things are changing, he agreed this project should be deferred. He suggested that perhaps
the Board should hold a workshop on this subject.
Chairman Ginn pointed out that the same people have been recently assessed for a
water project as well, so this seemed like an additional burden for them. She understood the
Commissioners did not support moving this project forward.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Faith Freed, 966 34th Avenue SW, as a 22 -year resident in Grovenor Estates on a
fixed income could not afford an assessment for 3 lots for $12,000-$13,000. Friends who
live in the Longwood area had a paving project where the costs were amortized over a six
year period using the money that ordinarily would have gone to the road grading costs. She
realized the property values would increase, but not enough to recover the costs.
Bruce Barkett appeared representing Dennis Lewis who has owned property at the
corner of Oslo Road and 35th Avenue for 18 years and whose assessment would have
originally been in excess of $30,000. He pointed out that would not pave Mr. Lewis' access
road. More importantly, prior to any reconsideration of continuing this assessment project,
he believed it appropriate to see if 60% of the property owners still support it. He also
questioned the validity of the original petition since most of the proponents have withdrawn
their names.
March 6, 2001 -
64
BK 11 7 PG 323
•
•
Theresa Tackett, 916 35th Avenue SW,
and a disabled husband. She was concerned
hardship it would create for her family.
advised that she has two school age children
about safety issues as well as the financial
Jeri Saturday, 1206 35th Avenue SW, advised that her assessment would be $8,000
for the two lots she owns. As a senior citizen she did not earn $8,000 last year. Also, she
worked and saved for 27 years to build a particular kind of house in a wooded neighborhood.
When she purchased the property she asked if there were any plans in the next 15 years to
pave and was told "certainly no". Because of property needed for easements, the tree -line
that secludes her house from the road would be destroyed. She believed that paving would
make the road more unsafe for children. She agreed that most of those who originally signed
were no longer in favor.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
There was a brief discussion as to how to proceed.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin to not move
forward on this project and that a workshop on paving be held
in the future, SECONDED by Commissioner Adams.
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams hoped that some creative solutions can be
presented in the workshop to aid in "chewing away the dirt roads"
Commissioner Tippin commented that the drought we are presently having has made
the dirt roads even worse and urged people to join with him in praying for rain.
March 6, 2001
65
CK iH7PG32tt
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Macht absent) .
PETITION AGAINST THE PROJECT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WITH THE BACKUP FOR THE MEETING
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - SUNTREE PARTNERS INC. -
REQUEST TO MODIFY CERTAIN APPROVED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
SETBACKS FOR CITRUS SPRINGS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
(Legislative
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of February 27. 2001 using
a site location map and graphic of Village "C" to aid in his presentation:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE: February 27, 2001
PA ' TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
a .J '.. i .
Robert M. Keating. AICP
Community/DJ ev lopment
f
Stan Boling. AICP
Planning Director
1
irector'
John W. McCoy. AICP 4 ^I
Senior Planner, Current Development
SUNTREE PARTNERS INC'S REQUEST TO MODIFY CERTAIN APPROVED
CONCEPTUAL PLAN SETBACKS FOR CITRUS SPRINGS P.D
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at their regularly scheduled meeting of March 6, 2001.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Knight. McGuire and Associates. Inc. has submitted an application on behalf of Suntree Partners.
Inc , to modify the approved conceptual PD plan setbacks for portions of the Citrus Springs PD
project. The development is located at the northeast corner of 58'h Avenue and 9'h Street S.W.
March 6, 2001 -
66
EK I i Pc; 325
•
At its regular meeting of January 11. 2000. the Board of County Commissioners granted conceptual
PD plan approval for Citrus Springs. That approved plan provides for 477 residential units on
191.54 acres. resulting in a density of 2.49 units per acre. No increase in the number of lots or
density is proposed. and no changes to any approved project parameters, layout. or conditions are
proposed with the exception of certain setbacks as described later in this report. The January 11`h,
2000 staff report for the Citrus Springs project is attached (attachment #3). That report accurately
represents all aspects of the approved project. except for the requested setback modifications.
As approved. the PD plan requires 15' sideyard setbacks for lots within Villages C and E within the
project (see attachment #2). Village C is located at the northeast corner of the project and is adjacent
to the project perimeter on the north and east sides Village E is located south of 5th Street S W. is
internal to the overall development and is not adjacent to any project perimeter. The applicant is
now requesting that the required sideyard setbacks for lots within Villages C & E be reduced from
15' to 7 5', and that the rear yard setbacks along the east side of Village C be increased from 25'
to 32.5' Pursuant to PD ordinance section 915.26. a setback which was approved as part of a
conceptual PD plan may be reduced only through approval of a modified conceptual plan. Since
this type of conceptual PD plan modification requires special exception approval through the public
hearing process. this request requires special exception approval.
Planning and Zoning Commission Action
At its regular meeting of January 25. 2001. the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously
(6-0) to approve the modified setback proposal for Villages C & E (see attachment #5). No
additional conditions were proposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
ANALYSIS:
To change the project's approved setbacks. the applicant must modify the currently approved
conceptual PD plan. Because no design changes are involved in the request. no project design
revisions are needed Consequently. the project s existing preliminary PD plan and land
development permit will remain in force. unchanged. Thus. only the conceptual plan requires
modification.
As currently approved. the setbacks for lots within Village C & E are consistent with the RS -3
rearvard (25') and sideyard ( 15')setbacks. The applicant is requesting that the currently required 15'
sidevard setbacks be reduced to 7.5' and the required rearyard setback be increased from 25' to 32.5'
on the west side of Village ' C" Thus. a trade-off, which will expand the buildable width of the
affected lots and reduce the buildable depth of the affected lots. is proposed. This change in the
building envelope configuration is needed to accommodate wider homes that the developer wishes
to build in Villages C & E In addition to the proposed setback trade-off. the applicant is proposing
a 20' nobuild zone (no accessory structures such as pods and decks) along the east property line of
Village C to enhance the approved buffer area where that Village abuts adjacent RS -3 property.
The following table compares parameters of the RS -3 district. the approved PD plan. and the
proposed PD plan setback changes:
March 6, 2001
67
BR I I f'' PG 326
•
Summary of Parameters and Setbacks
Development Parameters/Waivers
ZONING
RS -3
District
Village A (Duplex)
- Minimum Lot Size
- Minimum Lot Width
- Minimum Yard Setbacks
-Front
-Rear
- Side
- Side for Accessory Structure
- Minimum Open Space
- Density
12,000 sq. ft.
80 ft.
5,625 sq. ft.
45 ft.
25 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft.
15 ft.
40%
up to 3 units/acre
overall project
25 ft.
25 ft
15 ft. / Party Wall*
15 ft.
40%
3.71 units/acre
Village A only
Village B & D
(Single -Family)
- Minimum Lot Size
- Minimum Lot Width
- Minimum Yard Setbacks
- Front
-Rear
-Side
- Side for Accessory Structure
- Minimum Open Space
- Density
12.000 sq. ft.
80 ft.
8.125 sq. ft.
65 ft.
25 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft.
15 ft.
40%
25 ft.
25 ft.
7.5 ft.
15 ft.
40%
up to 3 units/acre
overall project
2.15 units/acre (Village B)
3.06 units/acre (Village D)
Village C (Single -Family)
- Minimum Lot Size
- Minimum Lot Width
- Minimum Yard Setbacks
-Front
-Rear
-Side
- Side for Accessory Structure
- East perimeter "no build" zone
- Minimum Open Space
- Density
12.000 sq. ft.
80 ft.
10.000 sq. ft.
80 ft.
25 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft.
15 ft.
10'
40%
up to 3 units/acre overall project
25 ft.
25 ft
1sft
15 ft.
1020'
40%
2.20 units/acre
Village C only
32.5' east rimeteronls
7.5'
March 6, 2001 -
Development Parameters/Waivers
ZONING
Village E (Single -Family)
- Minimum Lot Size
- Minimum Lot Width
- Minimum Yard Setbacks
-Front
-Rear
-Side
- Side for Accessory Structure
- Minimum Open Space
- Density
12.000 sq. ft.
80 ft.
10.000 sq. ft.
80 ft.
25 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft.
15 ft.
40%
up to 3 units/acre
Village F (Single -Family)
- Minimum Lot Size
- Minimum Lot Width
- Minimum Yard Setbacks
-Front
-Rear
-Side
- Side for Accessory Structure
- Minimum Open Space
- Density
25 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft.
40%
2.06 units/acre
1'.000 sq. ft.
80 ft.
6.250 sq. ft.
50 ft.
25 ft.
25 ft.
15 ft.
15 ft.
40%
up to 3 units/acre
Note: Pro. •sed Chan es Are in Reverse Prin
25 ft
25 ft.
5 ft.
15 ft.
40%
2.33 units/acre
:Vote: Where no waivers are requested. all size. dimensional cntena and setbacks are required to meet the RS -3
zoning cntena.
Note: Although the density for some Villages is over 3 units per acre. the overall project
density is 2.49 units per acre Thus. the project is under the RS -3 density limits.
Note: Pools, patios. decks, and enclosures must be set back at least 10 feet from a perimeter
propene line for single-family homes, -x - .t alon . the east
there will be a 20' no build zone.
line of Villa ' C wher
The approved conceptual PD plan requires a Type "B" 25' agricultural buffer
line of Village "C' . along the east proper}�
According to the approved plan. the Type "B" buffer could be reduced to a
Type 'C buffer, if the agricultural use/exemption were removed from the property to the east.
Even with removal of the adjacent agricultural use. the Type "C" buffer is still required since the
Village C perimeter lots could be less than the RS -3 minimum lot size of 12.000 SF. In this case.
the Type ' C" buffer serves to meet the compatibility standards of the PD ordinance. By meeting the
compatibility requirements for the less than 12.000 square foot lot size. the Type "C buffer will also
meet the compatibility standards for the proposed reduced side yard setbacks for Village C lots.
March 6, 2001
After the Citrus Springs conceptual PD plan was approved, preliminary plat approval was granted
for a conventional subdivision on the adjacent site to the east. That subdivision is Greystone
formerly known as Brookhaven subdivision. With the approval of Greystone. the agricultural
exemption on that site was removed. the groves were cleared and subdivision construction is under
way. With no agricultural exemption on the Greystone subdivision property. the buffer along the
east penmeter is automatically reduced to a Type "C" buffer. The applicant will provide the Type
'C" buffer and preserve an existing line of trees that straddles the Citrus Springs/Greystone
boundary. The tree line will be supplemented by the Citrus Spnngs developer to meet the Type "C"
buffer requirements
It should be noted that the developer of the Grevstone site has expressed verbal and written support
for the Citrus Springs project and the requested setback changes. Thus. the owner of the property
that would potentially be most affected by the proposed changes supports the proposed changes.
Staffs analysis is that the proposed changes are consistent with the approved PD plan. Given the
80' width of the Village "C" lots, the proposed rear yard setback increase. increased no -build zone.
and Type "C' buffer that is required by the LDR's. compatibility will be ensured at the Village "C"
east project perimeter. Therefore. staff has no objection to the proposed modifications.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis. staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approval
to modify the setback and no -build areas in Villages C & E of Citrus Springs. as represented in this
report. with all original conditions of approval to remain in effect and a Type "C' buffer required
along the east property line of Village "C".
ATTACHMENTS
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. BCC Staff Report of 1/11/2000
4. Letter from developer of adjacent property
5. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
6. Plan Graphics
March 6, 2001
70
BK 1 1 7 PG 329
• •
Director Boling noted some corrections to the chart entitled Summary of Parameters
and Setbacks on page 278 of the backup. (Clerk's Note: That new page has been inserted
in the above memo.)
Director Boling provided some clarification on the lot sizes and densities for
Chairman Ginn. In response to her concern about the open space, Director Boling advised
that the common green area has been doubled since the previous plan.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
John Haley, representing the Citrus Springs group, presented a handout showing
color photographs of a tree line they are trying to preserve in cooperation with Mark
Brackett, who was present, the developer of the adjacent subdivision. (Clerk's Note: Handout
has been filed with the back up in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) He requested they
be allowed to preserve some of the trees on that tree line and supplement then in accordance
with staffs recommendations in lieu of a berm. He then explained how they were able to
achieve the additional common green space. He commented on the following benefits to
Indian River County. They are working with the County on 5th Street SW and the bridge
over to Kings Highway. They have a developer's agreement with the Utilities Department
and have also worked with Public Works Director James W. Davis and his staff in acquiring
some right-of-way at the corner of 43' and 5th Street SW. In addition, they have increased
the setbacks to offset impact on their neighbors. They have converted some of the open
space that would have been used for stormwater retention to usable recreational facilities.
Intensity and impervious areas are not being increased. Some of the open space has been
used for sidewalks and ped -ways throughout the community. They have increased the
March 6, 2001
71
BK H
PG 330
recreational facilities and there will be a minimum of three community pools, tennis courts
and soccer fields. He requested approval to change the shapes of the houses. They plan to
build wider houses on the lots, rather than deeper. The Citrus Springs' residents will have
more open space in their backyards for their pools and swing sets Landscaping is being
increased as well. He advised that Frank Johnson and Dave Knight of Knight McGuire were
at the meeting to present quite a bit of detail about the open space and impervious space, but
because the Board has a lengthy agenda, perhaps they should just be prepared to take
questions and he advised he was ready to do the same.
Vice Chairman Stanbridge inquired about the trees, and Mr Haley responded that the
tree line would be trimmed up and cleaned up and the gaps will be filled with other trees that
fit the County's requirements. Vice Chairman Stanbridge commented that she would like
to see a video of that which Mr Haley advised he would be happy to provide.
In response to Commissioner Adams' inquiry, Mr. Haley advised that some of the
villages will be gated, but not the main entranceway.
Commissioner Adams was concerned that the soccer fields would not be used; she
would be pleased to supply information who to contact so that would not be the case
Mr. Haley advised that the soccer fields would be near the Citrus Springs entrance,
so the public can benefit from them as well. The other public access was via the ped -ways
which go throughout the community are outside of their community so joggers and others
can enjoy the open spaces.
Vice Chairman Stanbridge mentioned that there are plans for some other recreational
opportunities on the South Relief Canal, and she was pleased they had joined in with the
March 6, 2001
BK117p6331
•
County.
•
Chairman Ginn was pleased that Mr Haley had listened to what the Commission
wanted.
Commissioner Adams inquired if the developer still wanted named streets, and Mr.
Haley advised that they were satisfied with what had been previously approved.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) granted approval to modify the
setback and no -build areas in Villages C & E of Citrus Springs,
as represented in the report, with all original conditions of
approval to remain in effect and a Type "C" buffer required
along the east property line of Village "C", as recommended by
staff.
March 6, 2001
73
BK(I7PG332
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - JOE WIGGINS - CONCERNS
REGARDING 11TH STREET SW PAVING AND CODE
ENFORCEMENT (deferred from meeting of 2/20/2001)
The Board reviewed a letter received February 9, 2001:
TO THE COUNTY COMMJSIONERS
1 WOULD LIKE TO BE ON THE NEXT AGENDA TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS
OF 1 1" ST S W, WE HAVE SUBMITTED PITTIONS FOR PAVEING BUT THEY
SEEM TO GET LOST AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS TO THE
COMMSIONERS AS TO WHAT TO DO ABOUT TMS PROBLEM THANK YOU
2. I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS SOME CHANGES THAT NEED
TO BE MADE IN CODE ENFORCEMENT IN OUR AREA
v
d 2�7
� -fit' r
Joe Wiggins, 895 11`'' Street SW, advised that his situation is different from the
paving issue the Board spoke of earlier. He believed 11`h Street SW, which needs paving,
is being used about as much as Oslo Road. He advised of his two unsuccessful attempts to
get the paving done through the petition method. Since most of the property owners live out
of town, he paid the out-of-pocket costs. Somehow the papers from the first time were
misplaced after he brought them to the County. The second time, he had the property owners
send their petitions directly to the County. but Public Works Director James W. Davis
advised that only a few were received. In talking with the property owners, most were in
favor of paving. He cited several reasons for paving: frequent usage by County vehicles,
safety concerns heard from Thompson Elementary School, emergency vehicle response time,
dust, and frequent maintenance due to the dirt bike use which tears up the dirt road.
March 6, 2001 _
74
BK 11- PG 333
• •
Mr. Wiggins proposed that the County pave the road, assess the people, and have it
be settled since most of the people agree with the paving. It seemed to him that he was not
able to get the message through in spite of all his efforts. He believed the County could
come up with a decent amount that most of the people would not mind paying.
Public Works Director James W. Davis reviewed his memorandum of February 13`h,
2001:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Petition to Pave 11`" Street SW
Oslo Park Subdivision between
17`" Avenue and 9th Court SW
RE: Letter from Joe Wiggins to County Commissioners
Received February 9 2001
DATE: February 13, 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Joe Wiggins, resident of Oslo Park Subdivision, has requested to speak during the
February 20, 2001 Board meeting regarding the status of a petition to pave 11"' Street SW
between 17" Avenue SW and 9th Court SW (approximately 1 mile). Since 1993 County
staff has assisted Mr Wiggins in trying to obtain a valid petition to pave 111h Street SW.
On December 8, 1998, a letter was sent to all 44 property owners along 11'" Street SW
requesting that they indicate their willingness to participate in a special assessment
program to pave 11th Street SW. Only 8 responded in favor of the special assessment
paving and 2 were against. Thirty-four inquires were not returned. At this time, a valid
petition has not been received. In early 1999, staff initiated a CDBG program application
study for road paving in Oslo Park. However, grants for road paving only are difficult to
obtain and the project was ceased. Staff has informed Mr. Wiggins that only 35 feet of
right-of-way exists along 11`" Street SW. All property owners along the north side of 11'"
Street SW (unpiatted side) were contacted to see if they would donate nght-of-way for road
paving. Positive response was not received.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Staff has not received a valid petition signed by 66.6% of the property owners fronting 11th
Street SW. To pave the road, additional right-of-way and stormwater treatment area is
needed. Staff has a few high traffic roads in the County in residential areas where paving
is cntically needed. These roads are as follows:
March 6, 2001
75
6R IE PG 3311
63r° Avenue between 4th Street and 8th Street - Pinetree Park
11th Street SW between 17'h Avenue SW & 9th Court SW - Oslo Park
83rd Street between_ 91' Avenue to 10151 Avenue - Vero Lakes Estates
Total
1/2 mile
1 mile
1 mile
2.5 mile
Occasionally, the County has funded 100% of the cost to pave high volume subdivision
collector roads such as Willow Street, 15' Street west of 43rd Avenue (Stevens Park) 14th
following conditions are met:
Street SW (Oslo Park), and 32rd Avenue between 4th Street and 1S1 Street SW if the
1) The road is a subdivision collector serving several branching local roads in a larger
area.
2) Numerous complaints for grading are received by Public Works Department
3) Paving the road will serve as an incentive for other voluntary special assessment
petitions from property owners along the branching streets.
4) The paving benefits many property owners not fronting the project.
5) The County will save the cost of frequent grading.
The Alternatives presented are as follows:
Alternative #1 - Since no petition has been received, encourage Mr. Wiggins and concerned
property owners to obtain a
valid petition for 11th Street. SW.
Alternative #2 - Authonze 100% County funding to pave the 3 roads above (63rd Avenue, 11th
Street SW, and 83rd Street). Right-of-way acquisition along 11th Street SW will be required.
Funding to be from account #109 - Local Option Gas Tax. Approximately cost is $750,000.00
over a 3 year period.
Alternative #3 - Investigate the feasibility of a special assessment project to pave all 11 miles
of roads in Oslo Park Subdivision. This area is rapidly developing with many small Tots.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Altematrve #2 is recommended.
ATTACHMENT
Letter from Joe Wiggins
March 6, 2001
76
BK 117 PG 335
•
•
Director Davis suggested a look at some of these higher use roads might be included
in the workshop that staff will be scheduling (see item 9.A.2.) in order to come up with a
way to get them paved. Right-of-way availability is the real problem. The County has taken
a minimal approach to eminent domain and condemnation because it can get very expensive
very quickly, but if the County is able to get the property owners' cooperation, then the
projects could fall into line.
Commissioner Adams believed historically that this and the Wabasso areas did not
receive attention previously for various reasons. She believed it is time to correct the
problems. She was not sure how to do it, since the County does not like to go to eminent
domain, nor place an assessment on a property where the owner cannot afford to pay it. She
suggested it be privatized in order to move rt faster. The alternative paving would allow us
to perhaps be able to partner with St. Johns River Water Management District for additional
help
Vice Chairman Stanbridge saw an opportunity to come up with creative ways to do
the paving, the stormwater, and to obtain rights -of -ways. She hoped the small area plan,
soon to be completed by Community Development, can be adapted to areas other than
Gifford. Also. she believed that being able to submit our Community Development Block
Grant applications to cover a neighborhood or a specific area, instead of the whole county,
will at least put our county's submission in the running for funding. It will raise our points
on the CDBG applications since the mean income for the entire county will not be a part of
the application. Hopefully that change will track through the Legislature successfully.
Commissioner Adams recognized all the efforts of Mr Wiggins in trying to improve
the neighborhood in many ways.
Chairman Ginn wished to see the Board move forward with staff's recommendation
on this matter. There are 3 streets listed that are in critical need.
March 6, 2001
77
1
436
Commissioner Adams pointed out that the $750,000 funding is a guess because the
cost for rights-of-way are unknown. She felt that this road should be a priority since it leads
to the school, but she wanted to have it looked at because a systematic way is necessary.
The Board needs to show leadership in taking care of all unpaved roads in the county for
those who want their roads paved.
Chairman Ginn agreed, but added that the road in question needed to be addressed.
Vice Chairman Stanbridge asked Director Davis if he could come back with costs for
each of the three projects listed in the memorandum.
Director Davis advised that he would do his best, but without designing them and
getting the rights-of-way under contract, it was difficult to get very definitive.
Administrator Chandler thought perhaps some of the people might be more amenable
to dedicating their right-of-way, and staff could move forward with that as soon as the Board
gives the direction.
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, to approve Alternative
#2.
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams suggested that community workshops be
held so that everyone understands what is happening especially prior to the survey process.
Director Davis advised that when another project was planned staff held a meeting
in a nearby church and it worked well. He thought perhaps the same thing could be done.
Mr. Wiggins agreed, but added there are many absent landowners.
March 6, 2001
78
BK 117PG337
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Macht absent).
(Approved Alternative #2: authorized 100% County funding to
pave three roads as in the above memorandum. [63' Avenue,
11`" Street SW, and 83`d Street] with understanding that right-of-
way acquisition will be required. Funding shall be from
Account # 109 - Local Option Gas Tax. Approximate cost is
$750,000 over a 3 -year period.)
u-:
Mr. Wiggins also wanted to address code enforcement. He stated that the people who
are getting cited are not the people who are creating and dumping the garbage. The property
owners have cleaned up their property several times and have no way to control the
offenders. He felt there needed to be a solution as it was creating problems for the innocent
property owners.
Commissioner Adams asked if Mr. Wiggins had a solution because this problem
happens all over the county. If the County can find out who is doing the dumping, staff can
actively pursue the offenders. There is no easy answer. One solution has been to fence the
property which is cheaper than having fines accumulate.
Mr. Wiggins suggested the County put out dumpsters as they do in Georgia.
Everyone in the area is taxed which covers the costs. A big fine is also charged if someone
is caught dumping. He specified that three houses are causing the problems and he has
talked with the Sheriff's office about it. He believed a dumpster would solve the problem.
Commissioner Adams knew there was an enforcement problem during the weekends.
She inquired if photographs were permissible evidence to cite people, and Community
Development Director Robert M. Keating advised photos can be used as evidence especially
if the person who took the photographs is willing to testify before the Code Enforcement
March 6, 2001
79
BK 1 d
338
Board.
In response to Chairman Ginn, Deputy County Attorney Will Collins advised that
Code Enforcement fines are typically $250 for a first offense, and $500 for a second.
Director Keating explained that Code Enforcement is usually reactive, not
prospective. Upon finding a violation, the violator is given time to correct the problem, then
fined for each day it is not corrected. He will work with the Sheriff's office on this report.
Commissioner Adams was not in favor of putting out dumpsters, and Chairman Ginn
and Vice Chairman Stanbridge agreed, because they are not attractive and discourage people
from taking their trash to the transfer stations.
Mr. Wiggins suggested a camera be used at the transfer station on the days it is closed,
because there is a lot of dumping outside the gates.
Chairman Ginn advised that the County is in the process of evaluating the transfer
stations. She thanked Mr Wiggins for his comments and appearance before the Board.
(The Chairman declared at 5 -minute recess at approximately
10:20 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at approximately
1010 a.m.)
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - COUNTY ROAD 512
CHARRETTE PRESENTATION BY CITY OF SEBASTIAN AND
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
The Board reviewed a letter of February 22, 2001
March 6, 2001
80
BK I i/ PG 3 3 9
4_r
CITY OF
SEBASTIAN
1111111116..
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
'225 MAIN STREET • SEBASriAN F-LORIDA 32958
TELEHONE ( 561) 589-5330 • TAX 156 1 1 589-5570
February 22, 2001
Honorable Fran Adams, District One County Commissioner
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
1840 25" Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: County Road 512 Charrette Presentation. March 6. 2001
Dear Ms. Adams.
RECEIVEL
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION
DISTRIBUTION MS'
w7 man i s t r;tcr_--
a� riser
P!rsonr.^1
Public' work;
:e#
JhUlles
F nonce
MB
Ene ,. Serv.
Risk Mgt
ether /i�at
Per our discussion earlier this month, the City of Sebastian wishes to make a formal m rc
presentation dunng your March 6t" County Commission meeting, relative to , .� c
recommendations for partnership regarding enhancements to County Road 512 in our
community. As you know, the Sebastian City Council recently adopted its corridor
master plan, per recommendations that culminated the charrette planning exercise last
November. As such, respective adjustments have been made to the City's Land
Development Code to incorporate venous new architectural, structural and landscaping
requirements. The remaining necessary component to successfully implement this
initiative involves Indian River County's participation to enhance county maintained
areas, including medians and nght-of-way portions of the thoroughfare. Accordingly, a
primary purpose of the aforementioned presentation will be to share with the County
Commission our vision, as we hope that a commitment will be established
Attendance will include myself and other city representatives, as well as officials from the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. We will be present at Commission
Chambers circa 9:00 a.m. An overhead projector will be necessary to facilitate the
presentation, anticipated to last approximately thirty minutes.
Thank you making 1 for1
ing arrangements to hoot our presentation and willingness to
ascertain our progressive position with regards to enhancing community pnde and
appearance. Should you have questions and/or concerns, feel free to contact me by
calling (561) 388-8203. Otherwise, we look forward in seeing you all March 6th'
Sincerely,
AA �
erre ce Moore
City Manager
Cc: Honorable Mayor. Vice Mayor and City Council
Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Tracy Hass, Director of Growth Management 9 My Documents/CR512Presentauon
March 6, 2001
'An Equal Opportunity Employer
Celebrating Our 75th Anniversary
81
BX 7 PG
•
101
Chairman Ginn welcomed City of Sebastian City Manager Terrence Moore and
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Urban Design Director Marcela Camblor.
(CLERK' S NOTE* The following presentation was enhanced by
a photographs and a copy has been placed in the backup in the
office of the Clerk to the Board.)
Terrence Moore was pleased to share the City of Sebastian's vision with regard to
the future for CR 512. One of their goals and objectives is to compile comprehensive master
plans for specific thoroughfares in the community. In the fall of 2000, they commissioned
the TCRPC to assist them with the Charrette process whereby staff, elected officials,
developers and citizens had an opportunity to get together to discuss CR 512. They are now
ready to move forward, but the only missing link is a partnership with Indian River County
as far as beautification and enhancements. He introduced Tracy Haas to give an overview
of various enhancements.
Tracy Haas, Director of Growth Management for the City of Sebastian, advised he
is in the process of trying to implement the master plan for the CR 512 corridor on which
presently there is a serious lack of landscaping and unappealing and unattractive architecture.
With respect to the Land Development Regulations, they had already implemented a CR 512
overlay district similar to the SR 60 plan. He presented a commentary on the photographs
and explained the requirements under their new proposals. One of the unique aspects of CR
512 is that there is a 74 foot building setback along the corridor and each property is required
to incorporate a cross -access easement. The setback includes provisions for parking,
driveway, and enhanced landscape buffers. They have incorporated new architectural styles
to create more attractive buildings. They want to institute a tree canopy within the right-of-
way with the cooperation of Indian River County to provide a more attractive boulevard,
March 6, 2001
82
BKI 17 P6 3 44 I
tIVI
such as has been done on SR 60. The photographs showed the architectural styles desired
for the future During his presentation he indicated the preferred looks -the city is trying to
achieve. He yielded the podium to the next speaker and stated he looked forward to working
with the County to improve the CR 512 corridor.
Marcela Cambior, TCRPC's Urban Design Director, recounted the origination ofthe
partnership between Sebastian and the TCRPC relative to the 2-1/2 miles of CR 512 through
the City of Sebastian. She narrated additional photographs starting with the citizens master
plan. The citizens believe that Sebastian is a very special place and are very concerned about
new development. Everyone is aware that new development will be coming in and wants
to insure it happens within their terms. They asked the citizens to define their vision for CR
512. One of the first things mentioned was landscaping. The citizens want several things
including a narrower street, heavily landscaped medians and corridors, shade, visible
sidewalks, restaurants, safer crossings, better lighting, special treatment at the main
intersections, parking of businesses to be connected, special entry features, traffic calming,
better architecture, a roundabout at Roseland Avenue, buffering in the residential areas, and
so forth. Some of the ideas were implemented into the master plan, some were not.
Changing the name of CR 512 was a very big item. It was proposed to call it Sebastian
Boulevard to make it feel more like part of the city. In the future, she will be addressing it
as Sebastian Boulevard. There was talk about a train station, land purchasing, redesign of
the Orange Heights neighborhood, and more parks to tie the fork back into the
neighborhoods, the waterfront, and preservation of the land along the entrance bridge. Ms.
Cambior pointed out there are four distinct sections of the roadway: the entrance to the city,
the commercial section, the fork, and where it intersects US 1. She then showed photographs
of each section and comparison photographs of sections of I 95 and CR 512. It is understood
that the County will be widening the first section, but the citizens wanted a 60' median rather
March 6, 2001
83
B►
731 2
than a 200' so that the land on either side is not as seriously impacted. She showed a sketch
of what that area might look like for an entrance to the city. Next. she showed photographs
of how the commercial section looks today and sketches of how future commercial
properties could look with additional landscaping. She suggested and showed sketches of
tree placement. Curb and gutter is very expensive and does not make sense for the entire
length of SR 512, but would make sense at the main intersections, such as Easy Street,
Barber, and Roseland. Trees and other plants would also enhance the intersections and allow
drivers to know something special is going to happen. After consulting with everyone, they
propose to change the configuration of the next section known as "the fork". This would
enable neighborhoods to be joined and allow for additional development. The land between
the roadways is known to be very beautiful but has not been developed because it sits in the
middle of the two roads. Finally, she discussed the US 1 intersection and the proposed
improvements. This plan allows the City of Sebastian to come to the County for exactly the
number of trees they would like and other improvements.
In response to Commissioner Adams' inquiry about cost, Mr Moore realized this
appeared to be a very ambitious plan but possible.
Mr. Moore advised that they were merely asking the County to work with the City of
Sebastian to come up with a viable plan. He suggested that it could start with planting trees
and other vegetation in the medians as well as in the rights-of-way for beautification. The
vast majority of this plan involves the private sector and private development and is being
incorporated into the City's LDRs. Before they can talk about substantive costs, they have
in mind to keep this affordable and realistic. The cost that Commissioner Adams inquired
about would have to be determined.
Commissioner Adams commented that the plan to beautify CR 512 goes back many
years. When the CR 512 corridor was 4-laned in the early 1990's, there was a lot of
March 6, 2001
OKI
84
PG 343
Ow -
•
discussion with Councilwoman Carolyn Corum, a leader in trying to beautify the entire city
with native plants. Commissioner Adams pointed out that what has been called the "median"
is actually a stormwater collection area and those two should not be confused. The people
of the neighborhood requested that the red cedars be planted to act as a shield from CR 512,
because they had lost all their woods The cedars have not completely achieved that. She
was very disappointed with the "runway effect" of CR 512 through Sebastian. Orange
Heights residents were very concerned about a lot of entrances to their neighborhood and did
not want easy access. Some of the fencing addressed their input when CR 512 was 4-laned.
The County now includes hardwood landscaping when 4-laning roads She called the
ultimate plan presented at this meeting "beautiful." She recalled when the TCRPC, in about
1990-91, did a charrette; their answer for beautifying Fellsmere was to get rid of the Little
League park in the middle of town and put in a fountain with a frog and a bass and some
orange trees. Well, the heart of the town is going to watch Little League and the sentiment
was that the people from Stuart were crazy. She believed the County has a commitment to
try to provide some oaks along CR 512 and she supports that effort. The median
enhancement may be a little more difficult in order to meet stormwater treatment
requirements. It will be necessary to determine the County's responsibility versus the City's.
After seeing this presentation, she was very willing to give the City CR 512 and let them
maintain it rather than spend about $25 million for improvements.
Mr Moore interjected that the City is just looking at various logistics as to what will
work. It is ambitious and the responsibilities are still to be determined. The purpose of this
presentation was to let the County know the overall master plan. He advised they were
prepared to present the County with the renderings and hoped the Commission would give
direction to enable them to work with County staff.
Commissioner Adams wanted to point out in reference to the earlier comparison
March 6, 2001
85
PG 3144
•
between I 95 and CR 512 that I 95 has been there 30 years and the section of CR 512 has
been there only 3 years. She also felt they needed to understand the difference between
wetlands and a sand ridge.
Chairman Ginn thought it was a marvelous plan, a very fine presentation that sets a
vision for Sebastian. She understood they had spent time to find out what the residents want.
When she goes to Stuart once a month for a TCRPC each month she travels Martin Downs
Boulevard which is the way CR 512 should look. She is committed to help in this long-range
effort and felt this was a wonderful start. She was very happy it has been started and thanked
Ms. Camblor for coming to make the presentation. She extolled the TCRPC for their good
efforts and charrettes. Their staff is addressing a lot of issues that are new and she was
grateful for the fine work.
Mr Moore asked for questions. There were none. He asked if it would be
appropriate to request a motion, and Commissioner Adams thought it would not be but
suggested he sit with staff to determine if there is MPO enhancement money available for
when the additional 4-laning occurs.
Mr Moore thanked the Commissioners for the opportunity to address them.
9.B.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - ROBERT J. LESHE, CITY
COUNCILMAN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES REGARDING LOST
TREE ISLANDS
Robert Leshe advised that he was appearing as an individual and his intent was not
to criticize but to point things out which have caused him a lot of concern as a member of
the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee. His major concern is the ranking of the islands
He listed the votes from the most recent ranking and the islands were number 10 on the list
to be purchased. The two #1 ranking votes were from the Town of Indian River Shores and
probably the City of Vero Beach because the two municipalities pay the consequences; there
March 6, 2001 -
86
BOK I 17 PG 3 4 5
•
are none to the other members. He believed the low ranking reflects to the general public
the wrong importance of purchasing the islands. He recommended the Board consider
weighted votes. He listed the objectives of the LAAC and stated that the islands meet 5 of
the 6 objectives. He asked the Board to consider using some of the bond money from the
$26 million to purchase the islands, to reapply to the Florida Communities Trust for
matching funds, to allow the Town and the City to have a little more say and participation,
and to allow the municipalities to see who else they can get involved in the purchase of the
islands
Tom Trolley, 4903 Sunset Drive, advised he had recently been advised that of the 150
or so miles of the Indian River Lagoon, there is only one narrow area, and that is right in the
funnel where the Lost Tree Islands are. He spoke with Jim Egan, the director of the Marine
Resources Council, who confirmed that was a serious concern because of the nature of it as
"sort of the plug in the bottle." The islands are a distance from the flushing action of the
inlets at Sebastian and Ft. Pierce. Also, Vero Beach has many canals which contribute to the
fresh water flow into the lagoon. He suggested that the County gather all the information
from the MRC and from Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute and forward it to the State.
Mr Egan suggested it is very possible that we have fish and sea grass species around those
islands that are not found anywhere else in the lagoon. He felt this would highlight the
environmental sensitivity in working towards the saving of the islands
Chairman Ginn was certain Vice Chairman Stanbridge had been in touch with the
MRC and HBOI as environmental concern is one of her areas of expertise.
Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that the lagoon's narrows extend all along the
Jungle Trail. The area of the Lost Tree Islands is not the cork although it is very valuable.
She had a problem that the development agreement put on the table by DCA, DEP and
undoubtedly agreed to by the Town and City has elevated the price of those islands In fact,
March 6, 2001
87
8{
7PG346
•
the Governor asked for a price and the developer said $100 million. Until we get a bottom
line figure, no one can touch them. She felt that was what we have to wait for.
Mr. Trolley understood, but was just bringing it up to point out the narrows portion
by Jungle Trail. There is a much wider area of water beyond the original Orchid Island to
the west, so this is really not the narrows.
Vice Chairman Stanbridge absolutely disagreed stating that she is the County's
historian and it has been the narrows for 200 years.
9.B.4. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - AFFORDABLE HOUSING
IMPACT FEE FINANCING - PRESENTATIONS BY THE RICHMAN
GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC., THE PALMS, AND LINDSEY GARDENS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 28, 2001:
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
February 28, 2001
Affordable Housing Impact Fee Financing
Date:
Subject:
From.
Fran B. Adams
Commissioner
Public discussion to facilitate existing affordable housing applications with presentations by The
Richman Group, The Palms and Lindsey Gardens.
Anita Mitchell, president of the Mitchell Group from Palm Beach County, a public
relations group, hoped to clear up many of the misunderstandings she has read in the
newspaper to result in a comfort level that their project will be an asset to the community.
She introduced Sharon Merchant who had served for 8 years on the State Legislature and is
familiar with how to go about getting good information at the State level. She also
introduced Todd Fabbri, a vice president with The Richman Group of Florida, Inc. She
March 6, 2001 -
88
BK PG 3 7
•
advised that The Richman Group specializes in affordable housing, but also has expertise in
investment banking, development, and asset management. Communities appreciate the fact
that The Richman Group keeps their properties after development and has on-site
management. They wish to partner with the County to build a quality development on SR
60 at 74th Avenue. Dialog with staff began back in August about the County's development
of affordable housing policies and they took an option on the property. They were aware
that a study on affordable housing was to be done, but were willing to take the risks and
waited for the study to be presented on February 7`h. The results of the study indicated that
there is a big need for affordable housing which will get even bigger. She gave the definition
of "net present value" and explained how the County could make a cash contribution, a
grant, or waive fees in the amount of $300,000 as required by the state. The Richman Group
presented several alternatives to the Board of County Commissioners and staff for the
County's participation in their affordable housing project, all of which complied with the
State's requirements. The Richman Group is trying to meet a deadline of the Florida
Housing Finance Corporation. A commitment is necessary today because their grace period
will end on March 8th. She understood there were concerns and she hoped to dispel those
concerns. She advised that the zoning and site plans have been approved so they were ready
to move forward. The Board will have the opportunity for architectural review. The project
has 192 apartment units; 20% are 1 -bedroom, 50% are 2 -bedroom, and 30% are 3 -bedroom.
Approximately 50% will serve residents with incomes at or below 28% of the area's median
income; 85% will serve residents at or below the 60% area median income. The project has
over 70% of the property undeveloped and gives 50% open space, excluding the water
retention. One hundred percent of the units will be kept affordable for 50 years. Secondly,
regularly scheduled visits by healthcare specialists will be provided for the residents. There
will be regularly scheduled activities for children and residents. They commit to provide
•
March 6, 2001
89
BKI
Pr 1'48
amenities for the apartments. The clubhouse will have a library, a computer room, and an
exercise room. There will also be recreational facilities in the community center. From
attending prior meetings when affordable housing was discussed, and in order to give the
Commissioners information, three representative residents from Kyle's Run (a Richman
project) were present who wished to be heard.
Cindy Arrango, assistant manager of Kyle's Run apartments, found KR to be an
absolute necessity. Having moved from Connecticut and not knowing this area, they found
KR to be an excellent development. She has served both as Leasing Agent and Assistant
Manager. This type of community is absolutely necessary for families coming from the
north and other areas in Florida who are single parents struggling to raise their children. Free
after school care is offered to the residents, as well as monthly credit counseling meetings,
monthly homebuyers incentive programs, budgeting and saving information. She and her
husband saved money and recently moved into their own home. This would not have been
possible except for the low rental rates and seminars offered at KR She disagreed that KR
is a ghetto or a high crime location.
Cynthia Himes, now the leasing agent at KR, came to this area about a year ago from
Ohio to start over with her 3 children (16, 14, and 12). If it had not been for her ability to
live in KR, she would not have been able to succeed. She really likes the community
because of the pool and other amenities for her children. If there was a lot of crime, she
would not have her teenagers there. Living there has been a blessing and the community
service there keeps her grounded. KR does not look like a "project" as they are known in
the north.
Cheryle Smith, a resident of KR, moved here about 6 months ago from
Massachusetts. She and her husband have two small children. There are many other
children there for hers to play with. She did not see it as a "ghetto", but looked at living
March 6, 2001
et( 1 1 s PG 349
1
there as a stepping stone to binge able to afford their own home. The children attend Vero
Beach Elementary, a wonderful school. and the after school care is a wonderful program for
working parents. The playground and pool are big pluses. She saw no problems there and
felt there is a need for affordable housing. Just because they do not make a lot of money
does not mean that they do not deserve a good place to live and a nice place to raise their
children.
Sharon Merchant advised that she would address the concerns of the Board
concerning affordable housing. The Richman Group is sensitive to the fact that they are not
the only developers who wish to build affordable housing in Indian River County, but she
understood they are the only ones who have a viable application that has been submitted for
the 2001 Florida Housing Finance Corporation funding cycle. The second concern is that
Village Grove Apartments is looking to save $300,000 in interest income; they want to build
a high quality project in the community which the community will be proud of. In order to
comply with the rules, they must have a commitment of $300,000 net present value from the
County, and in exchange, Indian River County will have an $18 million multi -family project
of high quality. There is no question that the $300,000 would be passed on to the renters as
spoken of by the three ladies who have lived at KR She reviewed the amenities provided
for the adults and children which will be offered. Their application did not include projected
cash flows because the FHFC does not require it. They would be happy to cooperate further
with information desired by staff They would also cooperate with the County should it
require a first lien provision. Finally, regarding the concern about lack of time to review
their application, they had been working with County staff and the company staff is willing
and able to assist in the review. She reiterated that today is their last chance because their
grace period will expire in two days.
In response to Chairman Ginn, Todd Fabbri was not certain what was used on the
March 6, 2001
91
Bits
f^N
match for KR as he was not part of that project. He thought it might have been a density
bonus that at one time FHFC viewed as a contribution.
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating advised that KR did receive
a density 20% bonus and FHFC has changed their rules since KR came in. FHFC no longer
considers a density bonus as an allowable local contribution.
Ms. Merchant advised they were flexible as to the length of time on the deferral,
which is one of the variables.
Mr. Fabbri advised that FHFC has set a "discount rate" for this year at 7.403%, so any
interest rate above that will not be considered a contribution.
Additional information was requested and provided concerning the determination of
the "net present value". Mr. Fabbri also advised that there is actually a calculation in order
to reach the $300,000 amount, which will be verified by the FHFC during the application
process.
Commissioner Adams explained this has been an education since the County and
Commissioners have not experienced this method in the past. She continued to ask
questions about rentals in an affordable project versus a regular rental.
Ms. Mitchell interjected that residents of Indian River County will have first priority
on their rentals. They also do background checks on every applicant.
Mr Baird gave a report on previous applications. Staff has previously advised
applicants that the County does not give a local contribution. Both Lindsey Gardens and The
Palms of Vero had also approached staff for local contribution and applied for industrial
revenue bonds They both went forward with their projects without the benefit of either.
Procedurally he had a big problem. The other groups have inquired for some time. He felt
the County needed to be fair to all applicants. Staff needs time to develop the rules and
determine how much the County can afford. It will take 30-60 days for staff to develop the
March 6, 2001 -
92
BK 1 /PG35!
::A
•
program. This is all new to staff and the Commission. The Richman Group will miss their
deadline, but so did the other groups. He also advised of the specifics on each of the
different applications that The Richman Group had submitted and the lack oftime to develop
the numbers to determine the cost to the County on their latest submission. He felt if this
group were given approval, it would be unfair to The Palms and Lindsey Gardens, who came
in earlier and already owned their property, also he would not know what was being
approved. There were too many questions as to the cost to the County.
Administrator Chandler recounted the recent process by which staff came with a
report to the Board on affordable housing needs. Staff still needs to develop a program with
incentives and alternatives. Without having done that, staff could not make a proper
recommendation on a fully developed incentive and know its financial impact on the County.
Chairman Ginn read the motion passed on February 13th and pointed out there has not
been time to learn the impact even on the Utilities Department. She was also concerned
about the fairness issue. She wanted to hear from staff rather than from a developer -driven
presentation.
Ms. Merchant made a final presentation requesting the Board to give their project
their consideration today and extolled the benefits of the project they planned. They were
very willing to work with staff to come up with an acceptable program.
Chairman Ginn commented on the various submissions that had been received from
The Richman Group and felt this could not be properly decided at this meeting since there
are still many issues to be addressed. She also was not aware that the density bonus had been
eliminated.
Administrator Chandler stressed that the policy in the past clearly did not include
incentives. The Board directed staff on February 13`h to come back with recommendations
on various types of incentives. It would then be up to the Commission to determine what
March 6, 2001
•
93
B'. 1 1 7 PS 352
"S
XR
those incentives will be based on staff's recommendations.
Ms. Merchant was upset at the inference that they were trying to confuse the County
with various applications. They were not and she specified what was sent and that they were
all legitimate and approved by the FHFC. She felt they should not be penalized for trying
to take advantage of a window of opportunity. They were not trying to be unfair to the other
developers.
Chairman Ginn specified that the request was not within the Board's policy and the
new policy has not been established. They could not open the windows of opportunity
without a policy in place.
Deputy County Attorney Will Collins pointed out that what is legal in other counties
may not be legal here. He had no clear understanding of the source of the money. The only
discussion was regarding a deferred payment of utility impact fees and that is not a matter
of policy. The County already has an ordinance saying that we can allow for deferred
payment of impact fees not to exceed 5 years at such interest rate (which could be 0%) as
the Board may determine. The Code also provides that we have a superior lien before
allowing that.
Ms. Merchant remarked that they would be willing to do that as long as the rate was
not 8% and asked the Board to allow Mr Fabbri to tell them of a conversation he had with
someone in the Utilities Department.
Mr. Fabbri had met with the Department sometime ago and they had mentioned the
ordinance's provisions but thought it applied more to single family dwellings, not this
purpose.
Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs advised that he had spoken with Mr.
Fabbri and Bruce Barkett on a conference call and the main point of his subsequent letter
sent in response is that the Utilities Department, along with the Utilities Advisory
March 6, 2001 -
94
6K 1 1 7 P6 3 5 3
•
Committee, did a rate study for Code revisions. It was done thoughtfully and systematically
and the implemented program is working. It would be, he thought, a mistake to go outside
of the realm of those rates now. In his letter, he pointed out that the impact fees had been
significantly reduced from 1997, and reduced overall in the last 4 years by 30%, and that is
a significant contribution.
Deputy County Attorney Collins thought there might be another large issue here.
That is, should the utility rate payers be the only ones underwriting affordable housing in the
county. A public purpose must be found in order to expend public money. It should then
be paid by the taxpayers at large, not just those hooked up to utilities.
Donna Pepper first asked Chairman Ginn to accept her apology about her remarks
from the last meeting which resulted in a "tempest in a teapot" in the newspapers and
embarrassed both of them. She felt the pressure of this presentation resulted in a change in
the FHFC rules allowing a grace period because their appeal process has gotten out of hand.
She felt this '`window" would exacerbate their problems. She felt that The Richman Group's
application was contingent on the County's confirmation of local government contribution.
The bond issue program is over and the first rankings are out; there are three applications for
Indian River County. She wanted the Board to know that Walker Avenue Club is currently
under construction. She had worked with Mr. Baird for two years, and she has owned the
property for four years. She explained how she was successful in achieving the industrial
revenue bonds in the past; she did not apply this year. She named the four incentives the
County does offer for affordable housing at the present time, each of them can be quantified.
The density bonus is no longer allowed because FHFC could not calculate its value due to
different values from county to county. She felt FHFC should be petitioned to permit it once
again. She also described the process she went through with her Walker Avenue Club.
Brian Heady advised that he was not against affordable housing. He originally lived
March 6, 2001
'��'{i� iY.ul �' •ni. >nqi'. A� i. ... � Ons i`�'
95
bit 1 1
X51,
•
<r
in the Moorings because he could afford it, but now lives in a more modest home, which is
becoming less and less affordable. He recalled that when Kyle's Run came to the Board
it was to be for local residents and yet each of the residents who gave testimony at this
meeting had come from the north. He stressed that for a tax break, the need for the tax is not
eliminated the cost is just spread out to others.
Bobby Klein. an attorney representing the developer (Brisben Company) of The
Palms of Vero Beach, appreciated the consideration mentioned earlier by Mr. Baird. He
wanted to clarify the difference between his client's project financing from The Richman
Group's. His client does not need any contributions, nor "net present value", or anything
like that from Indian River County. They were asking for direction to staff to advertise for
public hearing on April 4th in order to ask the Board to consider approval of the issuance of
industrial revenue bonds for which the Brisben Company would be the sole responsible party
for payment. (See item 7.J.) The bonds are a financing tool issued to finance a project.
Elska Forbes was present on behalf of her family on a project which is also trying
to compete for some type of bond money. She was not familiar with how it works, but felt
this was an interesting 11th hour move. Her family had previously lost a deal on their
property because of the cost of utilities. She asked if the County would give the same
consideration to all the developers on the impact fees.
Ms. Merchant appreciated someone else pointing out they were on a different track.
The Richman Group's application is the only viable one for the 2001 funding cycle. The
option they have on the property is also contingent on the Board's decision. She again asked
for the Board's favorable consideration.
Mr Fabbri expressed a willingness to sit down with staff to come to an agreement
with which staff would be comfortable.
Chairman Ginn reiterated her opposition to approving anything until the policy is in
March 6, 2001
96
BK 1 1 PG PG
•
place.
Commissioner Adams countered that this issue has not just come up. The issue of the
need for affordable housing has been aggressively deferred; now that the Board has received
facts and numbers as to that need, this application is before them.
Bill Mills, Real Estate Management Group, an agent for Lindsey Gardens, was
concerned because Lindsey Gardens already owns their property and has been paying taxes
on it. He asked where Lindsey Gardens would stand if the County approved this and could
not approve another project for two years.
Assistant Administrator Baird pointed out that they are all good developers and all
mean well. He thought approval of the request would not be in the County's best interest
because of lack of information and he could not recommend it. The Richman Group knew
of his concerns prior to this meeting.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, to propose a letter of intent to work
with this group to bring affordable housing with their effort.
Commissioner Tippin specified this was just a letter of intent.
Chairman Ginn spoke against the motion as being grossly unfair to the others and
reiterated that there is no policy in place.
Commissioner Adams wanted to bring it to a vote.
Chairman Ginn stated they would take as long as necessary, they were not going to
rush anything as long as she was Chairman.
Under discussion, Commissioner Tippin preferred not to vote on this. he seconded
only to continue to work with them. He did not want a firm commitment nor did he want to
put The Richman Group ahead of the others.
March 6, 2001
97
BX 11 PG 356
•
Chairman Ginn asked what the letter of intent was to include, and Commissioner
Adams advised that it would include that staff work with the group to develop the policies
that will enable us to move forward and make this project a reality.
Chairman Ginn understood the motion to be that the County would be developing
policies around this group so then they would be first in line. She wanted the motion very
clear.
Assistant Administrator Baird did not know if staff could meet their deadline, and
Commissioner Adams stated she had not set a deadline; anything staff developed and
recommended would have to come back to the Commission.
Chairman Ginn wanted policies developed free of any developers; developing policy
is up to the Board and to staff.
Vice Chairman Stanbridge believed that if the intent of this motion was just to work
on policy, it would not satisfy what The Richman Group needed to do within their time
limits.
Commissioner Adams agreed it would not. She explained her intent was not only to
do the policy but to work with them to make their project a reality and to do whatever the
education process needs to be for them to apply for the tax credit. The letter of intent does
not set a time.
Ms. Merchant stated they needed a letter of intent that the County intends to provide
them with $300,000 "net present value". If she understood correctly, Commissioner Adams
was saying that they will continue to work with the Commission and staff to find a
comfortable formula that will be available to any developer who wants to apply.
Commissioner Tippin WITHDREW HIS SECOND, MOTION FAILED.
Vice Chairman Stanbridge wanted staff to proceed with coming up with policies in
a timely manner. (THERE WERE NO FURTHER MOTIONS.)
March 6, 2001
98
E I I PG 357
tj
•
9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR
MARCH 20 2001 AT 7:00 P.M. IN SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS
Sebastian Water Ex s ansion - Phase III -B Resolution III
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 23, 2001:
DATE::
TO:
THRU:
FROM::
S UBJ::
FEBRUARY 21 2001
MARGARET GUNTER
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY/ASSISTANT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
DONALD R. HUBBS. P. E._ <Z
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
JAMES D. CHASTAIrcN
MANAGER OF ASSES
ENT PROJECTS
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM FOR BCC — MARCH 20. PUBLIC HEARING
SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -B
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97 -17 -DS
The following item has been rescheduled for public hearing on March 20, 2001. Please post under Public
Notice Items in the BCC Agenda the meeting prior. This meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. to the
Sebastian City Council Chambers. ( see attached ). Revised letters were mailed the property owners this
date.
SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION — PHASE III -B
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -97 -17 -DS
RESOLUTION III
The Chairman read the full title of this notice into the record.
9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARINGS
SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 20, 2001:
a. Applicant's Request for the Board to Reconsider the
Recreation Tract Area Condition Attached to the Approval of the
March 6, 2001
•
99
BK 17 P 3 358
Legend Lakes PD (Legislative)
b. Land Develo mentRe ulations Amendment North Barrier
Island Corridor Special Regulations (Legislative)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DON HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Developme Directo
Stan Boling,aAICP
Planning Director
February 26, 2001
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearings for the March 20, 2001 Board Meeting
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 6, 2001.
DES RIPTI • N AND 1 DI I • N
Please be advised that the following public hearings have been scheduled for Board consideration
at its:
March 20 001 meeting
Applicant's Request for the Board to Reconsider the Recreation Tract Area Condition
Attached to the Approval of the Legend Lakes PD(Legislative).
Land Development Regulations Amendment: North Barrier Island Corridor Special
Regulations (Legislative)
The above referenced public hearing dates are provided for the Board's information.
needed.
No action is
The Chairman read the title of this notice into the record.
•
9.C.3. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED
FOR APRIL 3, 2001 - TEFRA (TAX EQUITY FISCAL
RESPONSIBILITY ACT)
Financial Responsibility for The Palms at Vero
The Chairman read the title of this notice into the record. (See also item 7.J.)
10.A. LEGISLATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES - 2001
LEGISLATIVE SESSION - NABORS, GIBLIN, AND NICKERSON, P.A.
(SARAH M. BLEAKLEY)
Administrator Chandler reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of County Commissioners
rima ea - Sr ��� m._ 4".
es E. Chandler. County Administrator
February 26, 2001
Legislative Considerations
During the 2001 Session there are a number of matters of both general and specific
County interest that will be considered by the Legislature. Many of those will be monitored and
the County informed by organizations such as the Florida Association of Counties (FAC).
The matter of legislative and congressional redistricting. although of obvious statewide
interest. has specific implications for each individual local jurisdiction. The final determination
will affect the future representation of each. As such organizations such as FAC and the Florida
League of Cities which represent the general interest of all members will not concentrate on
monitoring the interest of a specific jurisdiction.
Considering the preceding and the redistricting implications for our area, I believe the
attached proposal to monitor and advise the County is reasonable.
A brief discussion of this matter indicated support for the recommendation.
March 6, 2001
101
BK 117PG360
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge. the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) accepted the proposal of Nabors,
Giblin, and Nickerson. P.A., as set out in their letter dated
February 22, 2001.
COPY OF LOBBYIST REGISTRATION FORM IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.A.1. STATUS REPORT OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
ADJACENT TO JUNGLE TRAIL (postponed from 2/20/01)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 22, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
' TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
`1.ert M. Keating. ArC
Community Development 9 rector
FROM: Roland M. DeBloisTAICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: February 22, 2001
.
RE•
1
Staff Report on the Status of Development Projects Adjacent to Jungle Trail
(Postponed from February 20, 2001 Commission Meeting)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its meeting of March 6. 2001.
DFSCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Development along the scenic and historic Jungle Trail Greenway has accelerated over the past year, so
much so that it is anticipated that most. if not all, of the remaining undeveloped land along the Trail will
be developed (or formally conserved) within the coming year. The level of development, including a
number of Jungle Trail buffer violations over the past few months, has prompted concerns expressed by
many county residents At the March 6. 2001 Board meeting, staff will present a pictorial overview of
projects recently developed and projects now proposed. as they relate to and affect Jungle Trail frontage.
For reference, attached is a map and matrix summarizing the status of the Jungle Trail buffer along the
length of the Trail, including established development, development under construction and proposed
development.
March 6, 2001
102
BK 117PG361
South Jungle Trail
The following is a list of projects along south Jungle Trail (south of C.R. 510) that have recently been
developed or are in the process of being approved for development (from south to north):
• Carlton River Club
• Sea Island Plantation (a.k.a. "Corrigan tract")
• Island Club (Beazer Homes)
• Jungle Trail Conservation Area (public access facilities)
• Sea Oaks Plantation Houses
• Bermuda Club
• Seasons Community
North Jungle Trail
Following is a list of projects recently developed or proposed along Jungle Trail north of C.R. 510:
• Old Orchid Subdivision
• Windsor (continuing phases)
• Plantation Pointe Planned Development (formerly "East Pointe")
• Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge (land acquisition, public access facilities. and
habitat restoration)
At the meeting, staff will give an overview of each of the listed projects and other Jungle Trail front
properties. Issues to be discussed include:
Preservation of pre -development nuisance exotic vegetation vs. replanting with native
plants
• Adequacy (or inadequacy) of planted buffers at time of planting
• Adjacent homeowner river view vs. "jungle -like" vegetated buffer
• Citrus tree buffers vs. "natural" vegetation buffers
• Redevelopment of properties with no current buffer (e.g., Jones's Pier)
RFCO^t�1F1i'pgTTn�
This item is a status report only; no Board action is recommended.
ATTACEmaus
General location map of protects along Jungle Trail
Jungle Trail Buffer- Status Matrix
March 6, 2001
BM 117 PG 362
- Incorporated Municipalities
- Jungle Trail South of C.R. 513,
area of County Maintenance Map
- Jungle Trail North of C.R. 510
Pelican Island i\WR
Plantation Pointe PD
s..,.rant
Realignment
Old Orchid Subdivision
Seasons Community
Bermuda Club
Sea Oaks
Jungle Trail C.A.
z."`a: Island Club
Carlton River
Club
Jungle
Trail
March 6, 2001
Marbrisa
Indian
Trails
• . ea Island
lantation
Jones's
l`Pier
1 ]I]
/// 1 //
/ ,RIVER SHORES
Sf /,Wiiiiii/////�
104
7 PG 363
•
Chief Environmental Planner Roland M. DeBlois gave a lengthy presentation using
visual aids including photographs and site maps of the various sections and developments
along Jungle Trail. He pointed out the necessity to balance private property rights,
environmental preservation issues, desire for river views, removal of exotic and preservation
ofnative vegetation, and historic preservation. He described each section ofJungle Trail and
its current status of development. During his presentation Vice Chairman Stanbridge and
Chairman Ginn questioned and expressed concerns regarding setback widths, Jones' Pier
being an historical and valuable property, Ais Indian midden, tree removals, grass, dust,
whether the County has a handle on enforcement after the projects are built out and turned
over to the residents, old citrus trees in the Old Orchid Subdivision, removal of Australian
pines, and other issues.
At the conclusion of his report, Mr. DeBlois pointed out the following issues with
which staff has dealt: existing exotics versus native replanting (whether to replace or leave
as people have become accustomed to seeing, as well as who and how to maintain if
replaced), size of plants at the time of planting (how much time to allow to mature with
proper maintenance versus time of planting), homeowner's right to a river view (more of an
issue on the south Trail), citrus tree buffer versus "natural buffer" and combination approach
(north Trail), and redevelopment of properties currently without buffers (such as Jones' Pier
and Corrigan tract properties).
Vice Chairman Stanbridge pointed out an area that Joe Michael and the Indian River
Preservation League preserved by protecting it from development. The whole area was to
have been filled in the 1960's with housing tracts.
Commissioner Adams credited Mr. DeBlois with a nice update.
Chairman Ginn agreed and asked for information concerning the entrance at the north
Trail.
March 6, 2001
•
105
3K 17 PG 3614
Vice Chairman Stanbridge pointed out that was the first property (Korangy tract)
purchased with the Land Acquisition bond money.
Mr. DeBlois added that Fish and Wildlife has brought in some fill material to build
up some of the dike areas and part of the refuge restoration project although it might look
like a development.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
(CLERK'S NOTE COPIES OF PHOTOS AND OTHER
INFORMATION USED FOR THE PRESENTATION ARE ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD )
CLERK'S NOTE' EMERGENCY SERVICES DIRECTOR DOUGLAS WRIGHT'S
REPORT ON A BRUSH FIRE IN OSLO AREA WAS GIVEN AT THIS POINT. SEE END
OF MEETING FOR THE REPORT.
THE CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCED A BRIEF RECESS AT
APPROXIMATELY 1:35 PM. THE MEETING WAS
RECONVENED AT APPROXIMATELY 1:43 PM
When the meeting was reconvened, Chairman Ginn advised that Mr Gordon Michael
had a few comments.
Gordon Michael, 2655 69' Street, owns property along the Jungle Trail and had lived
there for many years. He reminded the Board and others that they will never have an
opportunity to put back the area once it is taken away. He expressed his concerns about
removal of the Australian pines and an area at CR 510 and Jungle Trail and the drainage in
March 6, 2001
106
i7 PG 365
•
•
that area and the problems that could occur when the rains start. He felt the developers ought
to be responsible for the drainage on Jungle Trail since their presence and berm will have an
alternate effect on it.
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating advised drainage had been
looked at closely and believed there was an outfall pipe under Jungle Trail at the area in
question.
Mr Michael thought it would not be sufficient. He felt that the Sea Oaks residents
need to be aware that Jungle Trail was there before their homes were and one of the sales
points was Jungle Trail as it was then. He felt it was imperative the Board direct staff to
have them come up with a viable plan for the 30' setback before the homes are built since it
might never be done in the future.
Chairman Ginn stated she was heartsick after her tour to Jungle Trail the day before.
She felt the developers had gotten away with way too much.
Mr Michael felt that buffering of one of the phases of Sea Oaks is a joke; the hedges
are manicured to 4' and at another place the fences are visible. There is quite a bit of foot
traffic so the shade provided by the Australian pines should remain. He felt the way things
were going it would be Jungle Canal, not Jungle Trail.
Commissioner Adams believed that the management plan allows some of the
Australian pines to remain, and Director Keating stated that was correct.
Director Keating reported that he and Chief Environmental Planner Roland M.
DeBlois met with some of the Sea Oaks residents recently. The allowance is for 60% of the
buffer area to be opaque. There is an allowance for trimming to retain some of the views.
This is one of the issues that Mr DeBlois brought up because the residents want an
unobstructed view to the river and staffs objective is to maintain the buffer and the 60%
opacity.
March 6, 2001
107
1 Pon 3x66
Vice Chairman Stanbridge was very upset about what had been done to the midden
by Plantation: it was unforgivable and she thought it was deliberate. The $10,000 fine was
nothing to them.
Mr Michael raised an issue about some exotics which were taken out under staff s
direction. He felt the Board was saying one thing but the staff was telling the developers
something else.
After a brief discussion of how the pines got there, Director Keating stated that one
of the requirements of our lease with DEP for the Cairns property is that we remove the
exotics.
Commissioner Adams pointed out that hardwoods cannot be planted where the pines
are because they poison the ground, have a very shallow root system, and are very brittle.
Right now it looks denuded.
Mr Michael pointed out additional environmental concerns when the rains come.
When you put nine feet next to low lands, the water will run downhill and washouts have
occurred on Jungle Trail. He pointed out that some residents have only Jungle Trail as their
ingress and egress and experienced a problem with last year's hurricane.
Chairman Ginn asked staff to discuss this with SJRWMD to get assurances that what
is being done in Jungle Trail will provide adequate drainage. It looked to her like it will be
a mudslide in some areas. She also asked that staff arrange for her and other Commissioners
to see the stormwater management plans for the developments along Jungle Trail. She
suggested Mr Michael might like to see them also and that he be contacted.
11.A.2 REQUEST TO RESCIND RIVER ISLAND PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (PD) PLAN APPROVAL (Quasi -Judicial)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 28, 2001:
March 6, 2001
108
BX ii 7 r 367
•
TO: James E. Chandler
Count} Administrator
D. •AR MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
7
.JI
Les
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Dir ctor
FROM: Stan Boling. AICP
Planning Director
DATE: February 28. 2001
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO RESCIND RIVER ISLAND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
PLAN APPROVAL
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regularly scheduled meeting of March 6. 2001.
BACKGROUND
.At its meeting of January 9. 2001. the Board of County Commissioners voted 3-2 to approve the
River Island PD project with conditions (see attachments 2 and 3 ). That project is located along the
west shoreline of the Indian River Lagoon (see attachment #1).
The approved PD plan stated that the project site area was 1.88 acres. and depicted the site area in
bold lines. The site area depicted on the approved plan is landward ( west) of the site's lagoon mean
high waterline and, as uplands. has a density of up to six units per acre based on the site's RM -6
zoning (Residential Multi -family up to 6 units/acre). Based upon the representations made on the
PD plan. the plan was approved for 11 units on 1.88 acres. a density of 5.85 units per acre.
After the January 91" Board meeting. a neighboring property owner. Ronald Spicer, questioned staff
about the site area acreage figure. As a follow-up to that concern. staff asked the project engineer
to re -verify the site area figure. The project engineer has now verified that the site area landward
( west) of the site's mean high water line is 1.67 acres, rather than the originally stated 1.88 acres (see
attachment #5). Because 11 units on 1.67 acres would yield a density of more than 6 units per acre
(6.59 units per acre), the site area error in the original PD plan is critical and must be corrected. The
applicant proposes to address these discrepancies by correcting the site area figure and depiction on
revised PD plans and by reducing the project from 11 units to 10 units on 1.67 acres (5.99 units per
acre). Such changes would satisfy county requirements.
Planning staff has coordinated with the county attorney's office and has determined that the Board's
January 9'" PD plan approval needs to be rescinded due to errors shown on the PD plan and its
resulting density discrepancy. Staff has also determined that the Board could approve a corrected
and revised PD plan at a future public hearing.
Staff now requests that the Board take action to rescind the January 9. 2001. PD plan approval for
the River Island PD project and set a public hearing date to consider a corrected and revised River
Island PD plan.
March 6, 2001
109
Gil f B
i 1 ��V
i� L�
•
ANALYSIS
According to the County's Land Development Regulations. a site's zoning density allowance is
applied to the gross site area to derive the maximum number of units that can be built on the site.
Besides upland property. gross site area may include existing non -platted travelways and manmade
water bodies such as lakes and canals. For properties along the Indian River Lagoon. areas landward
of the mean high water line comprise the gross site area. In regard to the River Island PD site. the
area landward of the mean high water line is the gross site area and includes the existing 52' Court
travelway and portions of the canal located west of "52' Court". The onginal PD plan application
included a survey of the site area; however. that survey did not note an acreage figure for the site
area. The PD plan. prepared by the project engineer, reflected boundaries and information based on
the survey and stated that the project site area was 1.88 acres (see attachment #4). Staff accepted
the project engineer's site area figure and reviewed the project accordingly. Those plans were
approved by the Board on January 9th based upon the 1.88 acre site area figure provided by the
applicant.
Now that the site area has been found to be in error. the applicant proposes w revise the PD plan by
changing the site area figure from 1.88 acres to 1.67 acres. Those revised drawings are now being
reviewed by the County Surveyor to confirm the new 1.67 acre figure.
Because there is clear evidence from the project engineer that the gross site area is actually less than
1.88 acres and is less than the minimum gross area required for an 11 unit project in the RM -6
zoning district the January 9, 2001. approval by the Board needs to be rescinded. The Board may
also set a future public hearing date w consider approval of a corrected and revised PD plan. A
public hearing date that will meet advertising notice. and review timeframes is the April 3, 2001
Board of County Commissioners' regular meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Rescind its January 9. 2001 approval of the River Island PD, and
Set a public hearing for the April 3. 2001 regular Board of County
Commissioners meeting to consider approval of a corrected and revised
River Island PD plan.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map
2. Minutes from January 9, 2001 BCC meeting
3. Staff Action Letter
4. Old PD Plan Information
5. Applicant's Letter
March 6, 2001
110
S 1 1 7 X69
•
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED
13Y Commissioner Tippin, to approve staffs recommendation.
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams inquired how this was miscalculated, and
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating advised it was done by the project
engineer and pointed out to staff After that he went back to the project engineer and the
surveyor and had them reconfirm; that was when they determined the area was less than
originally stated.
Planning Director Stan Boling added that the County's surveyor will do the
calculation on the area for the new plans that are being submitted. The previous calculation
was calculated based on the old survey and should have been recalculated. It was a pretty
unusual situation.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (4-0, Commissioner Macht absent)
11.B. PURCHASE OF RACAL COMMUNICATIONS LOGGING
RECORDER FOR VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT E911
PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINT (PSAP) ON A SOLE SOURCE
BASIS - REPLAY SYSTEMS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 16, 2001:
TO:
Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Douglas M Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Services
March 6, 2001
111
'1 7PU370
•
DATE:
SUBJECT:
February 16, 2001
Purchase of a Racal Communications Logging Recorder for the Vero Beach Police
Department E911Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) on a Sole Source Basis
The Vero Beach Police Department E-911 Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) has a Dictaphone
Model 9102 ten (10) channel logging recorder which is used to record all incoming and outgoing calls
for the PSAP. This equipment was purchased in early 1992 with 911 Surcharge Funds. The recorder
has required a considerable amount of maintenance during the last several years and needs to be
replaced. The Dictaphone Recorder uses the outdated reel-to-reel technology and only allows ten
(10) channels to be recorded.
Given the critical requirements of a logging recorder in the PSAP, reliability and proven mission -
critical operation is a necessity. The Vero Beach Police Department requested replacement of the
older Dictaphone model with a Racal Wordnet Series 2 (24) channel Logging Recorder last year
during the budget process and S30,000 was allocated to purchase this equipment
The Indian River County Sheriff's Office PSAP also utilizes a Racal Wordnet Logging Recorder and
has found is to be very reliable functional. and easy to use. Staff is requesting to sole source the
purchase of the Racal Wordnet Series 2 for the Vero Bach Police Department E-911 PSAP so that
continuity can be maintained between the Indian River County Sheriff's Department E-911 PSAP and
the Vero Beach Police Department E-911 PSAP.
The Racal WordNet Series 2 twenty-four (24) channel Logging Recorder with installation,
networking software. re-record cassette deck and training is $29,906 00 and is being offered by
Replay Systems, the authorized Racal reseller for the State of Florida.
By maintaining continuity between the two (2) Indian River County PSAP's, maintenance could be
handled by one (1) company. Supplies and operating materials would be interchangeable between
the two (2) PSAP's and should the need arise, one (1) PSAP could record for the other.
Training between the two (2) PSAP's would be the same and allow operators ease of use during
critical situations such as disasters and emergency personnel relocations.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the Board approve the Racal Wordnet Series 2 (24) channel logging recorder for
the Vero Beach Police Department PSAP at a cost of $29,906. Funds in the amount of $30.000 were
budgeted for this purchase in the 911 Surcharge Account for this budget year.
ATTACHMENTS:
Replay System Logging Recorder Quote
March 6, 2001 -
112
3R 17 PC 371
• 1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED By
Commissioner Tlppin, the Board unanimously -(4-0.
Commissioner Macht absent) approved the purchase of the
Racal Wordnet Series 2 (24) channel logging recorder from
Replay Systems for the Vero Beach Police Department PSAP at
a cost of $29,906, as recommended in the memorandum.
11.C. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL DETENTION
ELECTRONICS PHASE I - MONTGOMERY TECHNOLOGY,
SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, LANDIS DIVISION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 19, 2001:
DATE: February 19, 2001
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Directordc.
SUBJECT: Indian River County Jail Detention Electronics Phase 1
BACKGROUND:
The Indian River County Jail was constructed in three phases with the first phase
(Administration Unit A and Housing Unit B) being occupied in 1984. At the time of phase 1
construction. the components for operating the detention facilities were manufactured under the
name of "Icotech." Montgomery Technology. Inc. supplied subsequent phases 2 & 3.
After 16 years of use and abuse. the need to replace the components in phase 1 has arrived. To
that end, the Board approved the allocation of funds in the current budget for the needed
replacement parts. The amount budgeted was $500 000.
Over the course of time. Building & Grounds staff has dealt with replacement parts from the two
different manufacturers and for technical support. Staff has had a very good experience relative
to Montgomery Technologies both in the area of cost and ease of diagnosis of problems.
It would be much more efficient if all the components were the same. To that end. Building and
Grounds Superintendent. Lynn Williams contacted Montgomery Technology regarding the
replacement of the phase 1 equipment. This was done to insure continuity of design,
replacement parts. and staff expertise and experience. The prime installation and service agent in
Florida for Montgomery Technology is Siemens Building Technologies, Landis Division.
Siemens then made several site visits reviewing the existing conditions and developed a scope of
services for the replacement of the equipment within the parameters established by staff.
March 6, 2001
113
i7PGo72
By necessity, the scope developed is specific to the facility and includes a disclaimer of items not
covered. The existing system as constructed is not well documented but it is expected that most
required work has been identified at this time. However, retrofit work of this complexity and age
can not be without unknown or hidden conditions. For this reason it is expected that change
orders may be necessary as the work is uncovered and progresses.
Siemens would act as the prime contractor and obtain the materials necessary to insure the
continuity of design through Montgomery Technologies, Inc. Montgomery would provide
technical support throughout the installation and retrofit.
Siemens has provided a proposal that includes the replacement/retrofit of the control panels.
video cameras and monitors wire management improvements and integration of the existing
components. All labor, materials, engineering and post installation documentation are included.
Necessary staff training will be provided after completion of the retrofit, as well as the
experience that staff can learn during the project.
Siemens has performed detention electronics work in locations throughout the State. The total
cost for the work described is $245,375. As work progresses, unexpected and unforeseen
conditions may occur. An hourly rate for the technicians involved was established to gauge the
impact of change orders that may be required. Most work will be completed after normal hours
to minimize the disruption of jail operation and avoid unnecessary access control issues.
Based upon the justification outlined above, a waiver of the requirements for bidding and for the
execution of the enclosed contract with Siemens Building Technology to provide the
retrofitiinstallation of the detention electronics at the phase 1 of the Indian River County Jail
appears appropriate.
RECOMMENDATION:
In order to allow for uniform standardization of detention equipment and the fact that Siemens is
the prime agent for Montgomery Technologies in Florida, Staff recommends that the Board
waive the normal bidding procedures. and authorize the execution of the attached contract with
Siemens Building Technology for the retrofit/installation of detention electronics at the phase 1
of the Indian River County Jail.
March 6, 2001 -
114
BK 1 1 7 PG 3 7 3
•
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously {4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) waived the normal bidding
procedures and authorized the execution of the proposed
contract with Siemens Building Technology for the
retrofit/installation of detention electronics at Phase I of the
Indian River County Jail., as recommended in the memorandum.
AGREEMENT AND ATTACHMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.E.1. BUDGET AMENDMENT 013 - FOURTH OF JULY
FIREWORKS FUNDING - CITY OF VERO BEACH AND CITY OF
SEBASTIAN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 28, 2001:
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager ,i
DATE: February 28, 2001
SUBJECT: Fourth of July Fireworks Funding
Budget Amendment 013
Background Information
For several years Indian River County has provided assistance in funding Fourth of July fireworks
displays in Vero Beach and Sebastian. The City of Vero Beach has requested assistance in funding their
celebration this year.
Alternatives
Alternative 1 - Approve funding for both the City of Vero Beach and the City of Sebastian in the amount
of $2,500 each. These contributions should be used for funding Fourth of July
celebrations only. The City of Vero Beach and the City of Sebastian must expend a
matching amount of $2,500 each before County funds may be released.
Alternative 2 - Deny funding Fourth of July fireworks displays
March 6, 2001
115
PG 3
•
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends Alternative 1, whereby the Board of Commissioners approves funding fireworks for
the cities of Sebastian and Vero Beach. Additionally, staff recommends approval of the attached budget
amendment to allocate these funds. M.S.T U. Fund contingencies will provide funding of $5,000.
Sandra Bowden, Mayor of the City of Vero Beach, made a brief presentation asking
the Board for a grant in the amount of $7,500 toward fireworks for the City's 4th of July
annual celebration. The total cost is $15,000 and the City is putting in $7,500.
Commissioner Adams recalled last year the County gave $5,000 based on a last-
minute emergency need. Previously the County has contributed $2,500.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised the source of funding would be MSTU
contingencies. He recommended the cities match the County's dollars by taking it out of
their general fund.
Administrator Chandler recalled that in the past the County gave $2,500 to each City,
Vero Beach and Sebastian, and that last year the amount were increased to $5,000.
Mayor Bowden asked the Board to make the contribution at least $5,000. She stated
it was difficult for the City to come asking for dollars.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, to give both City of Vero Beach
and City of Sebastian $2,500 toward their fireworks displays; MOTION DIED for lack of
a second.
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge,
SECONDED BY Commissioner Tippin, to grant $5,000 to both
City of Vero Beach and City of Sebastian for fireworks
displays.
March 6, 2001
116
EKI67PG375
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams was aware that the City of Sebastian raises
a lot of their fireworks money privately.
Mr. Baird advised that he had a problem taking these funds from our taxpayer dollars
in the unincorporated area and the cities, especially the City of Sebastian, should appropriate
that amount also in their budgets.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (4-0, Commissioner Macht absent)
(Budget Amendment 013 approved)
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Jason E. Brown ( Budget Manager t \
BUDGET AMENDMENT: 013
DATE: February 28, 2001
REVISED PER BCC DIRECTION 03/06/2001
Mayor Bowden thanked the Board.
March 6, 2001
Entry
Number
Fund/Dep&rtmenU
Account Name
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
•
1.
EXPENSES
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING
UNIT/ Recreation/ Fireworks
004-108-572-041.11
$10,000
$0
MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING
UNIT/ Reserve for Contingencies
004 199-581-099.91
$0
$10,000
REVISED PER BCC DIRECTION 03/06/2001
Mayor Bowden thanked the Board.
March 6, 2001
XkLf
11.E.2. POLICY FOR DISTRIBUTING "CHOOSE LIFE" LICENSE
PLATE FUNDS TO QUALIFIED NON-PROFIT AGENCIES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 27, 2001:
TO: Members of the Board of County missioners
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E. Brown `�
Budget Manager
I i
DATE: February 27, 2001
SUBJECT: Policy for Distributing Choose Life License Plate Funds
to Qualified Non -Profit Agencies
Background Information
During the 1999 session, the State Legislature passed legislation which established the Choose Life
License Plate program The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV) has developed
a Choose Life license plate in accordance with Florida Statute, 320.08058(30). This legislation governs
the collection and distribution of the proceeds from Choose Life license plate sales
Each Choose Life license plate carries an annual user fee of $20. These fees will be distributed to Florida
counties in proportion to the sale of such plates in each county. Every county must distribute the funds
to non-governmental, not-for-profit agencies that counsel and provide for the physical needs of pregnant
women who are committed to placing their children for adoption. Funds may not be distributed to an
agency involved or associated with abortion activities. These activities include counseling for or referrals
to abortion clinics, providing medical abortion -related procedures, or pro -abortion advertising. Likewise,
funds may not be distributed to an agency that charges women for services received.
The legislation does not establish procedures counties must follow in processing applications from
agencies requesting Choose Life funds. Therefore, each county must establish a process whereby
interested agencies may apply for these funds. Staff has developed the attached policy for agency funding
requests and approvals in order to ensure conformity with Ronda Statute, 320 08058(30).
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached Policy for Application and
Distribution of Choose Life license plate funds.
Attachments
• Choose Life License Plate Funds Policy
• Letter from DHSMV dated Dec. 28, 2000
March 6, 2001
118
BK i7 rG 377
•
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Stanbridge,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, to approve staff's
recommendation.
Under discussion, Budget Manager Jason E Brown responded to several questions
from Commissioner Adams. He advised that the Department of Transportation estimated the
County should receive between $5,000 to $6,000 a year. He asked for input from the
Commissioners as to agencies which should be sent information.
Commissioner Adams suggested staff be aggressive in finding agencies so there is not
an appearance of favoring any agency. She wanted to know that money would be used to
benefit mothers and children, not used for capital expenditures or travel or administration.
She suggested that the Children's Services Advisory Committee be used to assist with
ranking the agencies that apply.
There was CONSENSUS that the Children's Services Advisory Committee be used
to assist with ranking the agencies that apply.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (4-0, Commissioner Macht absent)
11.G.1. KINGS HIGHWAY PHASE I - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
- KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - FINAL RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 13, 2001:
March 6, 2001
•
119
e
�''i�u378
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
Public Works Director r�
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.,
Capital Projects Manager—
SUBJECT: Kings Highway Phase I, Construction Services
Final Release of Retainage
DATE: February 13, 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Kimley-Horn is requesting final release of retainage in the amount of 58,653.45 for construction
services on Phase I of Kings Highway. Design of Phase II Improvements is 100% complete and
will be advertised for bid when critical right-of-way issues have been resolved.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Final Release of Retainage in the amount of 58,653.45. Funding is from
Account 101-158-541 067.31.
ATTACHMENT
Final Payment Application
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) approved Final Release of
Retainage in the amount of $8,653.45 be paid to Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc., as recommended in the memorandum.
COPY OF RELEASE OF RETAINAGE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
March 6, 2001 -
120
BK 7 PG 79
•
11.G.2. FAIRGROUNDS BUILDINGS - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE & CONSUMER SERVICES (FDACS)
AMENDMENT TO GRANTS #4031, #4617, AND #5649 (AUDIT
PROVISIONS CHANGES)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 26, 2001:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
0
FROM: G. Sean McGuire, P.E. 1,
Project Engineer
SUBJECT: Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (FDACS)
Amendment to Grants # 4031, #4617, and #5649
DATE: February 26, 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The FDACS has requested that the Board execute an amendment for each of the three
grants that we have received from them for buildings at the Fairgrounds. The amendments
change the audit provisions of the original contracts and are necessary to bring the
contracts into compliance with current statutory requirements.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the amendments.
ATTACHMENT
Amendment for Grant #4031
Amendment for Grant #4617
Amendment for Grant #5649
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED By
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) authorized the Chairman to sign
the FDACS Amendments to Grants #4031, #4617, and #5649,
as recommended in the memorandum.
March 6, 2001
121
1:180
•
AMENDMENTS TO GRANTS #4031. 4617. AND 5649 ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.1. RIVER BEND SUBDIVISION FORCE MAIN
CONSTRUCTION - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT - RIVER BEND 296
LLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 23, 2001:
DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DONALD R. HUBBS
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SER
PREPARED MICHAEL C HOTCHKISS, P E
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
\7
SUBJECT: DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR RIVER BEND SUBDIVISION
FORCE MAIN CONSTRUCTION
BACKGROUND
River Bend Subdivision is a proposed 646 lot single-family home residential development located at
the southeast corner of 63' Street and U.S. Highway 1. A master planned force main is scheduled to
be constructed from the Central Region Wastewater Treatment Facility on an as -needed basis driven
by development (see attached copy of master plan map). The force main installation will comprise
constructing approximately 1 800 linear feet of 16" PVC along the Lateral "G" Canal right of way,
4,150 linear feet of 12" PVC along the 53id Street and U.S. Highway 1 right of ways and 4,100 linear
feet of 6" PVC along the 63'd Street right-of-way, from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plant to the northeast corner of the project. RIVER BEND 296 LLC, has agreed to enter into a cost
sharing agreement with the County to construct the master planned force main in conjunction with
their site development.
Attached is a proposed developer's agreement with RIVER BEND 296 LLC for reimbursement of a
portion of the subject force main. The Developer's Agreement is stipulated to reimburse the
Developer for the County's share of the force main based on itemized invoices of installed materials
on a percentage complete basis -less 10% retainage, monthly with final payment and release of
retainage at the time said facilities are dedicated to the County (SC — 1.A of attached agreement).
Developer will be required to post a 225% payment and performance bond prior to issuance of the
Utility Construction Permit (SC — 14 of attached agreement).
ANALYSIS
As shown in Exhibit B of the attached agreement, the estimated cost sharing between the developer
and the County is as follows:
March 6, 2001
122
•
Developer's Share
County's Share
Total Project Cost
$59,452.90
$446,932.10
$506,385.00
As homes are built in the project, homeowner's will pay a total of $2,646,016.00 in water and sewer
capacity charges. The developer has agreed to pay $458,544.00 to reserve 164 sewer equivalent
residential units.(ERU) prior to the County's reimbursement of funds described in the developer's
agreement. Construction of the force main will allow the County to coordinate expansion of the
wastewater collection system with development of the site, as well as provide sewer service to future
development along the improved corridor. The County's total share of $458,544.00 will be funded
from the capacity charge fund.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached developer's agreement as presented, and authorize the Chairman to execute the
same.
MCH/mch
Attachments
Commissioner Adams questioned staff concerning this agreement and was not
comfortable with approving it because she wanted more information about River Bend 296
LLC She felt there are a lot of groups were involved and asked about foreign limited
liability and Shopco.
Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs advised that the County Attorney's office
did their usual corporate research and found that United Corporate Services of Miami,
Florida is the registered agent.
Deputy County Attorney Will Collins advised that a foreign limited liability is a
limited liability company organized in some other state than Florida. It is required they have
a resident agent in Florida. He further advised the structure of a limited liability company in
that they do not have a president but act through their members.
Director Hubbs advised there was some initial confusion as to the owner and they had
to go back and forth a couple of times to get the name.
Commissioner Adams was very uncomfortable with this.
March 6, 2001
123
BK I i i PG 02
•
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, to defer this matter until more
information is known.
Bill McCain, of William F. McCain & Associates, explained that this does go through
several corporations. The project is the River Bend Golf Course on US# 1. There was earlier
confusion. He believed the County Attorney's office now had documentation for Arnold
Prayer to sign on behalf of the LLC He thought that before any benefit is derived from the
project (reimbursement), they have to pay their dollars to the Utilities Department which has
been done. He did not see how the County could lose and urged their approval.
Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs advised the County will not provide any
reimbursement until it receives at least that same dollar amount in capacity reservation. He
was comfortable from the dollar standpoint because the County is not out any money and this
is the standard developer's agreement.
Mr. McCain added that it is very critical to release the land development permit.
Deputy County Attorney Collins also added that the major member detail lists Roy
Prayer and is executed by Arnold Prayer.
Mr McCain stated that was the document he had referred to earlier as being on file
in the County Attorney's office.
Deputy County Attorney Collins suggested he could check for that document if the
Board wanted to approve contingent on his inspection of the document, but Commissioner
Adams responded that still does not tell the County who SHOPCO is or the principals
involved.
Chairman Ginn stated we still need the information and the matter could be brought
March 6, 2001
124
nrt
Gt1 6id'rb v83
•
back next week or whenever the information is obtained.
Commissioner Tippin was in favor of approving the agreement.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried by a vote of 3-1 (Commissioner Tippin opposed,
Commissioner Macht absent).
11.H.2. FLORIDA EAST COAST (FEC) RAILWAY COMPANY
ADDITIONS TO FEC BLANKET AGREEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 19, 2001:
DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS. P,)`
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVr
•
PREPARED STEVEN J. DOYLE P E
AND STAFFED INTERIM .ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: FLORIDA EAST COAST (FEC) RAILWAY COMPANY /
ADDITIONS TO FEC BLANKET AGREEMENT
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The County's underground utilities. which cross the Florida East Coast Railway Company (FEC) nght-of-
way are subject to an annual license fee. The Standard Blanket Agreements allow for the continued use of
select FEC Railway Company' right-of-way for the purpose of County water wastewater and reclaimed
water utilities. Schedule -A (attached) depicts a listing of all known utilities crossing under FEC right-of-
ways. The Schedule further defines the annual costs associated with each utility crossing. Three additional
utility crossings have been added to the FEC blanket Agreement. previously incorrectly listed under the Cin
of Vero Beach. The additional utility crossing are noted as File#228-3-39 File#235-4-1 and File #235-4-2.
Attachment -B is an Invoice from the FEC in the amount of 5825.00 for the three additional utility crossings.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends Board of County Commissioner approval
of the following:
a) Allow for payment to the FEC Railway Company in the amount of 5825.00 for the three (3)
additional utility crossings.
b) Authonze the Chairman to execute any necessary documents.
March 6, 2001
•
125
51(
r
Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs advised this is a correction item. The City
of Vero Beach had been previously paying for crossings that actually belonged to the
County. This adds three more crossings. The payment is retroactive.
Commissioner Adams advised that FECRR is not her favorite.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board by a 3-1 vote (Commissioner
Adams opposed, Commissioner Macht absent) approved
allowing for payment to the FEC Railway Company in the
amount of $825.00 for the three (3) additional utility crossings;
and authorized the Chairman to execute any necessary
documents, as recommended in the memorandum.
12.A. LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND
ACQUISITION GUIDE
The Board reviewed Memoranda of 2/14/2001 and 2/28/2001:
TO: Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Chairman, Land Acquisition Advisory Committee
FROM: a,William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: February 14, 2001
SUBJECT: Commission Land Acquisition Policy
March 6, 2001
126
•
Following yesterday's Board of County Commissioners meeting discussing the
Lost Tree Village Islands, you requested I review County policy on negotiations
for LAAC purchases. The following excerpts are from the "Indian River County
Land Acquisition Guide" approved by the County Commission May 7, 1991 as
revised July 20, 1993 and October 15, 1994.
• The County Commission has the final authority to establish land acquisition
policies, procedures, pnorities, standards and criteria
- page 2
• The Land Acquisition Guide may be amended by majority vote of the Board of
County Commissioners.
- page 3
• Staff duties and responsibilities include coordinating negotiations with owners
for property under consideration for acquisition. Negotiations may entail
direct contact with landowners and/or coordination with State cost -share
agency staff and other land acquisition entities, as applicable.
pages 12-14
• Conflicts of Interest. No member of the Board of County Commissioners may
be involved in the appraisal of or the negotiations for the purchase, sale, or
exchange of any real property on behalf of the County.
- page 14
Some of the Board's discussion on how to proceed with respect to the Lost Tree
Village islands seemed inconsistent with established County policy as cited
above, but a majority of the Board can revise policy at any time.
To: Board of County Commissioners
From. Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney-'
�Laid zIZ if Il
Re: Land Acquisition Advisory Committee
Attached is a copy of a memorandum from Deputy County Attorney Will Collins
regarding the County's land acquisition policy. Anticipating being absent from the March
6, 2001, meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, Commissioner Macht. Chairman
of the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee, asked me to place this matter on the Board's
agenda. The Indian River County Land Acquisition Guide, approved
County Commissioners on May 7, 1991, and revised on July 201993 andthe Oc oberd18of
,
1994, states, in pertinent part, as follows:
No member of the Board of County Commissioners may be
involved in the appraisal of or the negotiations for the
purchase, sale, or exchange of any real property on behalf of
the County_
March 6, 2001
•
127
1
According to the Land Acquisition Guide, it is the responsibility of staff assigned by the
county administrator to coordinate negotiations regarding the acquisition of real property.
The Guide provides for amendment by a majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners.
No Board action is required at this time.
PGB
Attachment
Deputy County Attorney Will Collins reviewed information in the above memoranda,
and Chairman Ginn advised that she had no problem concerning same.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
13.A. CHAIRMAN GINN - RESOLUTION #2001-023 - SUPPORT
FUNDING FOR REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS
Chairman Ginn reviewed her Memorandum of February 22, 2001:
To: All Commissioners
From. Chairman Caroline Ginn C&"
Date: February 22, 2001
Subject: Resolution in Support of Funding for Regional Planning Councils
Attached is a sample resolution provided by the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council.
The TCRPC is asking us to support them in seeking a more proportionate
share of funding from the state for regional planning councils.
At the present time, funding for regional planning councils relies on dues from
local governments plus some state funding.
The resolution supports the state contributing its fair share, so that the state
and county are equal partners in this unfunded mandate.
March 6, 2001
128
3M 17 PG 387
•
Vice Chairman Stanbridge felt that more and more of the expenses are being pushed
to local governments and it is important for the Commission to make sure we get the funding
to go with it.
Commissioner Adams favored getting rid of the regional planning councils and
offered a motion that the proposed resolution be ignored; motion died for lack of a second
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board by a 3-1 vote (Commissioner
Adams opposed, Commissioner Macht absent) adopted
Resolution No. 2001-023 supporting increased funding for
regional planning councils.
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA. SUPPORTING INCREASED FUNDING FOR
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida strongly supports adequate funding of regional planning councils in the State of
Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida recognizes that regional planning councils are required to perform numerous
state -mandated economic development, growth management, emergency
management, technical assistance, interlocal dispute resolution functions, and other
important statutory duties directed by the Legislature; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida recognizes that regional planning councils also provide a wide range of services
and assistance in support of local govemment initiatives and programs; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida believes the State is disproportionately relying on local dues and revenue from
local government to support regional planning councils which has resulted in the
reduction of many regional and local programs and initiatives; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida believes the State's responsibility for supporting regional planning councils
should be increased and shared more equally between the State and its local
governments.
March 6, 2001
•
129
BK
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-023
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONER OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1: The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida hereby requests the Legislature support the Florida Regional Councils
Association budget request for recurring funding for regional planning councils as a $3.0
million line item in the Department of Community Affairs base budget
Section 2: The Clerk to the Board of Indian River County Is directed to
distribute copies of this resolution to the Honorable Govemor Jeb Bush The Executive
Office of the Governor, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001; the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council 301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300, Stuart, Florida
34994; and the Florida Regional Councils Association, 314 East Central Avenue, Room
119, Bountstown, Florida 32424
Section 3: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Stanbndge and
seconded by Commissioner Tippin and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
Ruth M. Stanbridge Vice Chairman
Fran B Adams
Kenneth R Macht
John W. Tippin
Ave
fa
Absent
An
this 6th day of March, 2001.
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
ATTEST: Jeffrey K Barton, Clerk
_mal.<+
•.�1 is
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUE Fv"rNOY
BY �-�_/ ALac.- 7
Vt!_ 1.11j1: G. CGJIf\3 II
DEFUTY COUNTY F,TTORNEY
March 6, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: S,it,�Ec.tiei
Caroline D. Ginn, Cha man
BR
130
PG 389
•
•
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - UPDATE
Vice Chairman Stanbridge advised that she had worked in her updates during the
earlier portions of the meeting.
13.E. COMMISSIONER TIPPIN - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
EXTENSION ADVISORY COUNCIL DISTRICT IV
REAPPOINTMENT OF MIKE ZIEGLER
Commissioner Tippin reviewed a letter of March 1, 2001:
,_"_• ;; UNIVERSITY OF
FLORIDA
tsyt ,'
EXTENSION
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
Commissioner John Tippin
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 256 Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Commissioner Tippin:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICE
1028 20th Place - Suite D Vero Beach., FL 32960-5360
Voice (561) 770-5030 Fax (561) 770-5148
Internet http://i.ndian.ifas.ufl.edu`
E- mail indiam'iygnv.ifas.ufl.edu
March 1, 2001
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 ?001
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION
APPROVED BY
MAR - 6 1001
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSION
This letter is to suggest the reappointment of Michael R. Ziegler to serve as a county
representative on the Indian River County Extension Advisory Council. His three year term expired
January 2001. Mr. Ziegler has a lot to contribute to this organization and we feel that he represents
District 4 very effectively.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
aniel F. Culbert
County Extension Director
March 6, 2001
131
Gi
PG 390
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams. the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Macht absent) reappointed Michael R Ziegler to
serve as a county representative on the Indian River County
Extension Advisory Council.
SPECIAL REPORT - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
At the conclusion of item 11 A 1 , Emergency Services Director Douglas Wright
reported on a brush fire due to the drought in the Oslo Park area, advising that Thompson
Elementary School students had been evacuated and taken to safety to the South Park where
concerned parents may pick them up. He advised that some erroneous information was
being reported on one of the Palm Beach channels (Ch. 12) about where to pick up their
children. The fire was under control and two houses had been damaged.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Emergency Services District. Those minutes are being
prepared separately.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None.
March 6, 2001
BK
132
1 PG391
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 2:20 p.m.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Caroline D Ginn, Chairman
Minutes approved C4 J %G9 doe/
r
March 6, 2001