HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/2/2002MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY,APRIL 2, 2002 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chaiiman
John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman
Fran B. Adams
Caroline D. Ginn
Kenneth R. Macht
District 2
District 4
District 1
District 5
District 3
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION Rev. Charles Scragg, Retired
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Paul G. Bangel
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
Move item 11.A., Blue Water Realty, LLC - Request for Minor Change to Village Green/Countryside
DRI Development Order (Quasi -Judicial), to Item 9.A.2.
2. Add additional backup to Item 11.C.2., Citrus Best Management Practices CostShare Agreement with
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
3. Add additional backup to Item 11.I., Request for Exception to the 120 Day Due Date for Audit for
the H.0 P.E. Project.
4. Defer Item 13.E., Dodgers, until April 9, 2002.
BACKUP
PAGES
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Month of April,
2002 as National Child Abuse Prevention Month in Indian
River County
1
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular meeting of March 5, 2002
B. Regular Meeting of March 12, 2002
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1. Indian River County District School Board
Financial, Operational and Federal Single
Audit Report for FY Ended 06/30/01
2. Vero Lakes Water Control District Annual
Public Facilities Report
3. Sebastian River Water Control District
Annual Public Facilities Report
4. Indian River Fauns Water Control District
Annual Public Facilities Report
5. Delta Farms Water Control District Annual
Public Facilities Report
6. Fellsmere Water Control District Annual
Public Facilities Report
BACKUP
PAGES
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated March 14, 2002) 2-12
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated March 21, 2002)
Re-election of MPO TAC Chairman and Vice Chairman
(memorandum dated March 26, 2002)
Appointment to Serve on Canvassing Board for the Fall
Election
(memorandum dated March 25, 2002)
Out -of -County Travel for Comm. Macht to attend the
2002 NACo Annual Conference in New Orleans, LA -
July 12-16, 2002
(memorandum dated March 27, 2002)
Consideration of Proposed Amendments to the Indian
River County Local Housing Assistance Plan (LHAPlan)
(memorandum dated March 26, 2002)
State Fiscal Year 2003 Anti -Drug Abuse Granting Funding
Certificate of Participation
(memorandum dated March 19, 2002)
Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for
Lot 12, Block 19, Vero Lake Estates Unit 4
(memorandum dated March 20, 2002)
CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
J. Utility and Roadway Access Easement Deed and Use
Agreement
(memorandum dated March 21, 2002)
K. Domestic Wastewater Residual (Sludge) Agreement for
Indiantown Company Inc.
(memorandum dated February 5, 2002)
Forest Lake Subdivision Water Assessment Project -
Approval of Change Order \o. 1 and Request for Final
Payment
(memorandum dated March 20, 2002)
4. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated March 19, 2002)
1. Chase Meadows Subdivision — Modification to Contract
for Construction of Required Improvements
(memorandum dated March 19, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGES
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ESTABLISHING NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR WIRELESS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, AMENDING THE
FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAP-
TER 971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES;
AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PRO-
VISIONS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND
EFFECTIVE DATE
Request to Adopt an Interim Wireless Telecommunications
Facilities Ordinance, Amending Section 971.44 and Various
Sections of LDR Chapter 911 (Second Hearing) — Legislative
(memorandum dated March 27, 2002)
PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.): BACKUP
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS PAGES
Vero Lake Estates Stormwater Improvements, Phase I
Frank de los Hoyos (8565 97th Court) - Request for
Discussion Re: Culverting the 86th Street Canal at 97th
Court, Vero Lake Estates Subdivision
(memorandum dated March 25, 2002) 145
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
Blue Water Realty, LLC's Request for a Minor Change to
the Village Green/Countryside DRI Development Order
Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 25, 2002)
146-166
Emergency Services
None
General Services
1. Indian River County Citrus Best Management
Practices Priority List and Reimbursement Con-
tract
(memorandum dated March 25, 2002)
Citrus Best Management Practices Costshare Agree-
ment between Indian River County and Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
(memorandum dated March 25, 2002)
Contractual Custodial Services at North County
Library
(memorandum dated March 25, 2002)
Leisure Services
167-196
197-237
238-252
Office of Management and Budget
N one
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (coned.):
F. Human Resources (formerly Personnel)
None
Public Works
None
Utilities
None
BACKUP
PAGES
Human Services
Request for Exception to the 120 Day Due Date for
Audit for the H.O P.E. Project
(memorandum dated March 13, 2002)
253-256
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Updates
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran 13. Adams
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Dodgers
(no backup provided)
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 3/19/02
2. Final Payment .., Repairs and Upgrades of
Facilities at the Solid Waste Disposal District
IRC Bid #4025 Awarded to MGM Contracting,
Inc.
(memorandum dated March 22, 2002)
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
BACKUP
PAGES
257
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up niaterial is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00
p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m.
Meeting broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.
ru 128
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
APRIL 2, 2002
1 CALL TO ORDER -1
2. INVOCATION -1-
3.
1-3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -1-
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS -2-
•
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS -2-
Proclamation Designating the Month of April, 2002 as National Child Abuse
Prevention Month in Indian River County (Exchange Club Center for the
Prevention of Child Abuse of the Treasure Coast, Inc. [CASTLE]) -2-
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 5, 2002 -4-
6 B APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 12, 2002 -4-
•
APRIL 2, 2002
Ei
-1-
7 CONSENT AGENDA -4-
7.A. Reports -5-
7 B Approval of Warrants -5-
7.C. Approval of Warrants -13-
7.D.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Advisory Committee - Re -
Election of Chairman Robert Keating and Vice Chairman Christopher
Mora
7 E Elections Canvassing Board for 2002 - Appoint Commissioner Ginn
as Alternate for Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
-23-
23-
-24-
-24-
7.F.
7.F. Out -of -County Travel - 2002 NACo Annual Conference - New Orleans,
Louisiana - July 12-16, 2002 - Commissioner Macht -25-
7.G. Resolution 2002-017 Amending the County's Local Housing Assistance
Plan for FY 2000-2001, 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 -26-
7.1-1. Sheriff - Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice Grants
(Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance
Formula Grant Program) - State Fiscal Year 2003 Anti -Drug Abuse Grant
Funding Certificate of Participation - Substance Abuse Advisory Council
-33-
7.I. Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver - Lot 12, Block 19, Vero Lake
Estates Unit 4 - Holiday Builders -34-
7J. North County Regional Park - Project 9926 - Indian River County School
Board - Utility and Roadway Access Easement Deed and Use Agreement
-36-
APRIL 2, 2002
•
-2-
:r rr
I1
G
7.K. Indiantown Company, Inc. - Domestic Wastewater Residual (Sludge)
Agreement - Central Regional WWTF -37-
7 L Forest Lake Subdivision - Water Assessment Project - Change Order #1
and Request for Final Payment - Treasure Coast Contracting -39-
7.M. Payments to Vendors of Court -Related Costs -40-
7.N. Chase Meadows Subdivision - Modification to Contract for Construction
of Required Improvements - Chase Meadows LLC -42-
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2002-016 ESTABLISHING NEW
REQUIREMENTS FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES,
AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS); CHAPTER 911, ZONING;
CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES (Legislative)
-44-
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2002-018 AMENDING THE
DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DO) APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
(DRI) PROJECT FORMERLY KNOWN AS VILLAGE GREEN WEST &
VILLAGE GREEN SOUTH, SUBSEQUENTLY KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE
NORTH & COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH AND NOW KNOWN AS
COUNTRYSIDE MOBILE HOME PARK, VERO PALM ESTATES MOBILE
HOME PARK, AND BLUE WATER SUBDIVISION - BLUE WATER
REALTY, LLC (Quasi -Judicial)
APRIL 2, 2002
-3-
'i L CG 1 3
-76-
•
9B
11.A.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - VERO LAKE ESTATES
STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I - FRANK DE LOS
HOYOS, 8565 97TH COURT - RE• CULVERTING THE 86TH STREET
CANAL AT 97TH COURT, VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION -89-
RESOLUTION 2002-018 AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(DO) APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) PROJECT
FORMERLY KNOWN AS VILLAGE GREEN WEST & VILLAGE
GREEN SOUTH, SUBSEQUENTLY KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE
NORTH & COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH AND NOW KNOWN AS
COUNTRYSIDE MOBILE HOME PARK, VERO PALM ESTATES
MOBILE HOME PARK, AND BLUE WATER SUBDIVISION - BLUE
WATER REALTY, LLC (Quasi -Judicial) (Moved to 9.A.2.) -91-
11.C.1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CITRUS BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES (BMP) PRIORITY LIST AND REIMBURSEMENT
CONTRACT - INDIAN RIVER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
DISTRICT (IRSWCD) - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE
(NRCS) - ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
(SJRWMD) -92-
APRIL 2, 2002
-4-
11.C.2. CITRUS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) COSTSHARE
11.C.3.
AGREEMENT - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND
CONSUMER SERVICES (FDACS) - INDIAN RIVER SOIL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (IRSWCD) - UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) - NATURAL
RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) -96-
NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY - CONTRACTUAL CUSTODIAL
SERVICES - RAY CHOQUET RETIREMENT - CONTRACT WITH
CLEANNET USA
-99-
CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE - REQUEST FOR
EXCEPTION TO THE 120 DAY DUE DATE FOR AUDIT -HOPE
(HELPING OTHER PEOPLE EXCEL) PROJECT -100-
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES -W7-
13 E COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT - DODGERS -107-
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT -107-
14 B SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT -107-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD -107-
APRIL 2, 2002
-5-
•
April 2, 2002
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman; John W.
Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also
present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Stanbridge called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Reverend Charles Scragg, Retired, delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
County Attorney Paul Bangel led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
APRIL 2, 2002
-1-
i3L.
•
•
•
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Stanbridge requested the following changes to today's Agenda:
1. Move Item 11 A., Blue Water Realty, LLC - Request for Minor Change to
Village Green/Countryside DRI Development Order (Quasi -Judicial), to Item
9.A.2.
2. Add additional backup to Item 11 C.2., Citrus Best Management Practices
CostShare Agreement with Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services.
3. Add additional backup to Item 11 I., Request for Exception to the 120 Day
Due Date for Audit for the H 0 P E Project.
4. Defer Item 13 E , Dodgers, until April 9, 2002.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously made the above changes to the
Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF APRIL, 2002 AS NATIONAL
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (EXCHANGE
CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF THE TREASURE
COAST, INC. [CASTLE])
The Chairman presented the following Proclamation to Jacqueline Isles who
accepted on behalf of the Exchange Club:
APRIL 2, 2002
-2-
•
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF APRIL, 2002 AS
NATIONAL CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH
IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
WHEREAS, child abuse is a serious and growing problem affecting over 3,620 children on
the Treasure Coast, 75,000 children in the state of Florida annually, and more than 3.2 million
nationally, including more than 1,000 abuse -related tragic fatalities; and
WHEREAS, this societal malignancy known as child abuse respects no racial, religious,
class or geographic boundaries and, in fact, has been declared a national emergency; and
WHEREAS, every child deserves to live in a safe. permanent and caring family, knowing that
children from stable, healthy home environments are better prepared for school, have a significantly
better academic future and are less likely to become involved in drugs and crime; and
WHEREAS, the CASTLE of the Treasure Coast, incorporated in 1981 as the Exchange Club
Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse of the Treasure Coast, Inc., was the first center in the
country created for the sole purpose of bringing awareness to, and breaking the cycle of, child abuse,
qnd has become the model for a network of over 100 such agencies throughout 27 states, all working
win the battle against the devastating pain and lifelong results of child abuse; and
WHEREAS, the CASTLE (which stands for Child Abuse Services, Training and Life
Enrichment) through its support of parent aide programs, parenting classes, educational programs
and community service activities is making significant progress in stopping this crime against families
and children.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS that the month of April, 2002, be designated as
NATIONAL CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH
in Indian River County, and all citizens are urged to use this time to reflect upon, better understand,
recognize and respond to this grievous crime against defenseless children.
Adopted this 2nd day of April, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Ruth M. S anbridge, Chairma?
APRIL 2, 2002
-3-
nt( 'o° PG ;�
LI% i Vic.. I 3
•
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 5, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of March 5, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
March 5, 2002, as written.
6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 12, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of March 12, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
March 12, 2002, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Ginn requested that Items 7.G. and 7.K. be separated for discussion.
Chairman Stanbridge requested that Item 7 E be separated for discussion.
APRIL 2, 2002
-4-
„g
ro
7.A. REPORTS
The following have been received and are on file in the office of the Clerk to the
Board:
1. Indian River County District School Board Financial, Operational and Federal
Single Audit Report for FY Ended 06/30/01
2. Vero Lakes Water Control District Annual Public Facilities Report
3. Sebastian River Water Control District Annual Public Facilities Report
4. Indian River Farms Water Control District Annual Public Facilities Report
5. Delta Farms Water Control District Annual Public Facilities Report
6. Fellsmere Water Control District Annual Public Facilities Report
7.B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 14, 2002:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: March 14, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FIANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of March 8, 2002 to March 14, 2002.
APRIL. 2, 2002
-5-
•
CHECK
NUMBER
O 021596
O 021642
O 021643
O 021644
O 021645
O 021646
0021647
O 021648
O 021649
0021650
O 021651
O 021652
O 021653
O 021654
O 021655
O 021656
O 021657
0021658
0021659
O 021660
O 021661
O 021662
O 021663
O 021664
O 021665
O 303170
O 304466
O 317742
O 317862
O 318842
O 319362
O 319363
O 319364
O 319365
O 319366
O 319367
O 319368
O 319369
O 319370
APRIL 2, 2002
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for March 8-14, 2002, as
recommended by staff.
NAME
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
IRS - ACS
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
NACO/SOUTHEAST
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
FL SDU
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA)
VALENTINE, MARY WOODS
SCHER, DONALD J
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
KNOWLES, CYRIL
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
ACE PLUMBING, INC
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
A M BEST COMPANY
ADAMSON, RONALD
-6-
CHECK
DATE
2002-02-08
2002-03-08
2002-03-08
2002-03-11
2002-03-11
2002-03-11
2002-03-11
2002-03-11
2002-03-11
2002-03-11
2002-03-11
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2002-03-13
2001-05-24
2001-06-14
2002-02-14
2002-02-14
2002-02-28
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
r'x
4071*
nT
CHECK
AMOUNT
.00 VOID
4,822.09
41,756.12
28,712.50
4,234.60
8,566.54
4,981.06
2,442.12
599.72
11,617.60
260.55
138.50
37.75
115.38
50.00
50.00
423.40
2,480.00
80,811.33
193.86
9,897.20
242.69
132.46
6,708.71
956.36
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
.00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
103.50
54.00
88.80
368.60
416.96
28.69
947.59
129.95
1,061.26
•
O 319371
O 319372
0319373
O 319374
O 319375
O 319376
O 319377
O 319378
O 319379
O 319380
O 319381
O 319382
O 319383
O 319384
O 319385
O 319386
O 319387
O 319388
O 319389
O 319390
O 319391
O 319392
O 319393
ABS PUMPS, INC
AQUAGENIX
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
A T & T
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
ASPEN PUBLISHERS, INC
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
AMERICAN REPORTING
ARCH WIRELESS
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
A T & T
ALBERTSON'S
ABC PRINTING CO
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
ALLEN, NORTON & BLUE
AMAZON HOSE
ASSOCIATION OF STATE
AERIAL CARTIGRAPHICS OF
ERT SECURITY PROFESSIONALS
ALARM PARTNERS
ARTH CONSTRUCTION
CARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
ARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
ARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
RTON, JEFFREY K
KER & TAYLOR INC
ODART CO
Y STREET PHARMACY
YNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
EVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
OKS ON TAPE INC
LLSOUTH
RADFORD, MADGE A
OWN & BROWN INSURANCE
OMASS PROCESSING
YS & GIRLS CLUB OF IRC
IE, WILLIAM
ER, WILLIAM M
FORD, SUZANNE
ORE, RAYMOND E
LSOUTH
RON & BARKLEY CO
P, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
CK'S ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC
MENTS PEST CONTROL
STAL GRAPHICS
MMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
TROL SPECIALISTS CO
BER OF COMMERCE
RFIELD COMPANY, INC
POLACKWICH AND VOCELLE
-AIR SERVICE CO
OM CARRIAGES, INC
F BERRY, INC
Y'S PET CENTER, INC
NET USA
AL
O 319394
O 319395 B
O 319396 B
O 319397 B
O 319398 B
O 319399 B
O 319400 BA
O 319401 BA
O 319402 BR
O 319403 BA
O 319404 BO
O 319405 BR
O 319406 BO
O 319407 BE
O 319408 B
O 319409 BR
O 319410 BI
O 319411 BO
BAR
BOW
BEL
BED
BEL
CAME
CAM
CHU
CLE
COA
CO
CON
CRAM
CLEA
CLEM
COMP
CUST
CLIF
CIND
CLEAN
CES
COAST
CLIFF
CORPO
CENTS
O 319412
O 319413
O 319414
O 319415
O 319416
O 319417
O 319418
O 319419
O 319420
O 319421
O 319422
O 319423
O 319424
O 319425
O 319426
O 319427
O 319428
O 319429
0319430
0319431
O 319432
O 319433
O 319434
O 319435
O 319436
APRIL 2, 2002
TO COAST JANITOR SERVICE
ORD, MIKE
RATION OF THE PRESIDENT
R FOR EMOTIONAL AND
-7-
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
1,039.79
281.00
36.79
3.45
82,243.20
57.00
:30.50
2002-03-14 603.75
2002-03-14 7,458.01
2002-03-14 43.00
2002-03-14 113.66
2002-03-14 58.00
2002-03-14 65.00
2002-03-14 186.99
2002-03-14 40.00
2002-03-14 134.28
2002-03-14 111.00
2002-03-14 27.19
2002-03-14 100.00
2002-03-14 190.00
2002-03-14 406.00
2002-03-14 1,500.00
2002-03-14 30.00
2002-03-14 848.00
2002-03-14 41,162.40
2002-03-14 4,870.57
2002-03-14 46,906.65
2002-03-14 4,985.50
2002-03-14 144.24
2002-03-14 3,734.15
2002-03-14 2,039.26
2002-03-14 3,353.52
2002-03-14 15.99
2002-03-14 144.72
2002-03-14 206.15
2002-03-14 395.94
2002-03-14 21,258.96
2002-03-14 308.00
2002-03-14 198.75
2002-03-14 91,606.41
2002-03-14 5,090.02
2002-03-14 160.00
2002-03-14 20.12
2002-03-14 60.37
2002-03-14 46.77
2002-03-14 179.58
2002-03-14 184.74
2002-03-14 33,910.70
2002-03-14 1,089.00
2002-03-14 180.00
2002-03-14 146.04
2002-03-14 16,564.90
2002-03-14 5,520.00
2002-03-14 4,392.25
2002-03-14 197.40
2002-03-14
650.84
2002-03-14 850.00
2002-03-14 840.00
2002-03-14 87.50
2002-03-14 15.29
2002-03-14 20,537.72.
2002-03-14 303.25
2002-03-14 585.00
2002-03-14 200.00
2002-03-14 39.00
2002-03-14 57.00
r,v ) #)
til r tt. f..
LLG
•
O 319437 COLUMBIA HOUSE
O 319438 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
O 319439 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
O 319440 COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC
O 319441 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
O 319442 CINGULAR WIRELESS
O 319443 CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS &
O 319444 CARLISLE, CARRIE L
O 319445 CHILL, JULIE
O 319446 COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH
O 319447 COBH, WILLIE JAMES
O 319448 DAILY COURIER SERVICE
O 319449 DATA SUPPLIES, INC
O 319450 DAVES COMMUNICATIONS
O 319451 DELTA SUPPLY CO
0319452 DEMCO INC
O 319453 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
O 319454 DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
0319455 DUN & BRADSTREET
O 319456 DUVAL FORD
O 319457 DATA SUPPLIES, INC
O 319458 DEBLAK{ER, KARLEEN F
O 319459 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
O 319460 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
O 319461 DADE PAPER COMPANY
O 319462 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
0319463 DELL MARKETING L.P.
0319464 E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
0319465 EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
0319466 ELPEX, INC
O 319467 EDUCATIONAL RECORD CENTER, INC
0319468 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
0319469 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONSULTANTS
O 319470 ENGLISH, ELEANOR
O 319471 EVERGLADES FARM
O 319472 ECKERD DRUGS #2762
O 319473 FEDEX
O 319474 FELLSMERE, CITY OF
O 319475 FIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
0319476 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
O 319477 FLORIDA BAR, THE
O 319478 FLORIDA EAR, THE
O 319479 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
0319480 FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC
O 319481 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
O 319482 FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
O 319483 FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE
O 319484 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
O 319485 F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
O 319486 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
O 319487 FIRSTLAB
O 319488 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
O 319489 FIRST UNION
O 319490 FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
O 319491 FLORIDA COPY DATA
0319492 FRENCH, GEORGE
O 319493 FLINN COURT REPORTING
0319494 FRAZIER, HAZEL
O 319495 FLAIG, CHRISTOPHER
O 319496 FLESCHER, ROSEMARY
0319497 GALE GROUP, THE
O 319498 GENEALOGICAL PUBLISHING
O 319499 GENERAL GMC, TRUCK
O 319500 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
0319501 GALL'S INC
APRIL 2, 2002
•
-8-
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
21.57
4,153.47
934.84
10,000.00
685.44
812.78
25.00
87.00
12.00
83.59
94.12
1,472.00
1,755.96
331.98
30.41
447.60
2,522.84
732.47
1,723.50
84,189.00
1,102.12
12.00
22.76
622.10
598.79
169.99
3,364.00
12.00
35.60
480.14
17.48
3,000.00
15.00
651.26
475.30
128.84
40.50
93.30
13.95
198.21
35.00
245.00
17,074.49
6,016.80
199.62
1,728.00
90.00
35.00
12.82
5,369.87
76.50
761.08
18,611.45
25.00
98.46
12,444.45
293.00
59.76
30.00
12.00
656.89
44.80
158.41
72.07
72.58
PG {4I
O 319502 GULFCOAST FIRE & SAFETY CO INC
O 319503 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE
O 319504 GAMETIME
0319505 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
O 319506 GREAT -FULLY DEAD PEST MGMT INC
O 319507 GREENAWAY, BRIAN
O 319508 GEICO
O 319509 HAMMOND & SMITH, P A
O 319510 HBS, INC
O 319511 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH
O 319512 HILL MANUFACTURING
O 319513 HALE CONSTRUCTION, INC
O 319514 HACH COMPANY
O 319515 HERCULES INC
O 319516 HUSZAR, LESLIE MD
O 319517 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
O 319518 HYATT REGENCY TAMPA
O 319519 HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING
O 319520 HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL
O 319521 HARRIGAN, TEANNA
O 319522 HANSON, DEBRA
O 319523 HICKMAN, BURLEY
O 319524 HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
O 319525 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319526 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319527 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319528 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
O 319529 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
O 319530 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
O 319531 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
O 319532 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319533 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
O 319534 IBM CORPORATION
O 319535 IBM CORPORATION
O 319536 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
O 319537 IPC/MAGNUM
O 319538 JACOBS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
O 319539 JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS
O 319540 JORDAN, ELIZABETH M
O 319541 JIMMY'S TREE SERVICE, INC
O 319542 JAMES SMALLEY UTILITY SHEDS
O 319543 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
O 319544 JOHNSON, ANSELMO, MURDOCH,
O 319545 J F MEYERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR
O 319546 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
O 319547 POWELL, MARY D
O 319548 KOUNS, DARLENE
O 319549 KRIVAN, EDITH
O 319550 K -MART #7294
O 319551 KRISS, HOLDEN E
O 319552 KELLER, JENAE
O 319553 KIRBY VETERINARY HOSPITAL
O 319554 LESCO, INC
O 319555 LONG, JAMES T ESQUIRE
O 319556 LEBOURDAIS, ANITA
C319557 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
O 319558 LEWIS, RUTH A
O 319559 L B SMITH, INC
O 319560 LIVE OAK ANIMAL HOSPITAL
O 319561 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
O 319562 LABOR FINDERS
O 319563 LAWRENCE, FARON
O 319564 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC
O 319565 LUNA, JUVENAL
O 319566 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION
APRIL 2, 2002
-9-
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
600.00
10,482.33
1,163.34
6,349.80
24.00
15.00
436.56
20,600.00
683.00
14,490.00
123.03
500.00
215.00
3,528.00
200.00
65.00
260.00
924.00
267.00
7.72
75.00
300.00
58,280.93
115,108.97
230.00
100.00
540.20
725.02
4,608.58
10.64
640.00
1,552.50
1,023.59
50.00
212.31
30.00
40.00
300.00
5.00
300.00
185.00
119.70
2,365.35
25,015.00
3,056.10
137.46
139.05
342.56
119.59
130.50
43.77
32.00
95.60
10,500.00
20.00
3,000.17
26.97
107.35
116.75
61.00
1,452.03
536.65
11.92
231.00
600.00
Cu d
11
117
1142
•
•
O 319567 LIGHTNING LEASING INC
O 319568 MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP
O 319569 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO
O 319570 MACHT, KENNETH
O 319571 MASTELLER, MOLER & REED, INC
O 319572 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
O 319573 MORGAN AND EKLUND, INC
O 319574 MATTHEW BENDER & CO, INC
O 319575 MATRX MEDICAL INC
O 319576 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
O 319577 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
O 319578 MULLER MINTZ, P A
O 319579 MORNING STAR/NEW WAVE
O 319580 M G B CONSTRUCTION
0319581 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
O 319582 MILLER, JERRY D
0319583 MICROMARKETING, LLC
O 319584 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
O 319585 MEDCHECK
O 319586 MARRIOTT BAY POINT RESORT
O 319587 MORTON SALT
O 319588 MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
O 319589 MtDTRONICS PHYSIO -CONTROL
O 319590 M -R HOMES
O 319591 MAX MACHINERY INC
O 319592 MIDLANTIC DATA SYSTEMS
O 319593 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
0319594 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
0319595 NATIONAL GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY
0319596 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
O 319597 NATIONAL INST OF GOVT
O 319598 NATIONAL REGISTER PUBLISHING
O 319599 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
O 319600 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
O 319601 NORTRAX SE L.L.C.
O 319602 NATIONSRENT
O 319603 NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES
O 319604 NOWLIN, TIAIRA
O 319605 NORCIA, KIM
O 319606 NYQUIST,ANDERS
O 319607 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
O 319608
O 319609
O 319610
O 319611
O 319612
O 319613
O 319614
O 319615
O 319616
O 319617
O 319618
O 319619
O 319620
O 319621
O 319622
O 319623
O 319624
O 319625
O 319626
O 319627
O 319628
O 319629
O 319630
0319631
O 319632
APRIL 2, 2002
•
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
P B S & J
POWERAM, INC
PETTY CASH
PORT CONSOLIDATED
PUBLIX PHARMACY #0385
PUBLIX PHARMACY #0642
PERSONNEL PLUS INC
PUBLIX PHARMACY
PROFORMA
PESHA, JESSICA
POINTE WEST LTD
PERKINS PHARMACY
POLK DIRECTORIES
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
PARKS AND SONS INC
RINGHAVER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
RINKER MATERIALS
RUSTIC DIMENSIONS, INC
-10-
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
20C2-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
125.00
142.81
8,699.48
1,156.08
1,700.00
112.20
3,321.00
35.74
585.00
226.54
60.25
1,834.49
428.00
1,000.00
214.88
100.00
850.83
366.00
6.34
297.00
1,258.49
20.00
14,536.78
1,000.00
2,000.93
4,752.00
63.20
262.33
75.00
34,036.67
290.00
1,428.68
498.44
45.51
211.50
1,810.00
3,095.48
15.45
15.00
140.00
769.65
1,120.88
199.50
2,272.50
219.22
195.50
300.51
94,948.82
1,400.00
591.00
12.45
22,501.26
19.54
24.90
342.00
60.85
19.95
38.62
10,228.88
90.00
447.00
5.60
6,284.75
212.28
195.03
1,536.52
O 319633 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
O 319634 R & G SOD FARMS
O 319635 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
O 319636 RILEY EMERGENCY MEDICAL REPAIR
O 319637 RCL DEVELOPMENT
O 319638 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
O 319639 RASMUSSEN, KARA
O 319640 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
O 319641 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES BREVARD
O 319642 SAFETY KLEEN
O 319643 SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
O 319644 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
O 319645 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
0319646 STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE
O 319647 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
0319648 SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
0319649 SUNRISE TRACTOR & EQUIPMNT INC
0319650 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
O 319651 SAFESPACE INC
O 319652 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
O 319653 SEXTON, HILDY
O 319654 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
0319655 SELIG INDUSTRIES
O 319656
O 319657
O 319658
O 319659
O 319660
O 319661 INC
O 319662
O 319663
O 319664
O 319665
O 319666
O 319667
O 319668
O 319669
O 319670
O 319671
O 319672
O 319673
O 319674
O 319675
O 319676
O 319677
O 319678
O 319679
O 319680
O 319681
O 319682
O 319683
O 319684
O 319685
O 319686
O 319687
O 319688
O 319689
O 319690
O 319691
O 319692
O 319693
O 319694
O 319695
O 319696
O 319697
S YSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
S TARCK, DONNA
S TEVENS PRINTING
S IMS, MATTHEW
S WANA
SAFETY PRODUCTS
S EBASTIAN RIVER
S TAGE & SCREEN
SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE
S TONE'S TRANSPORTATION
S UNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC
S UNCOAST COUNSELING &
S IMES CONSTRUCTION CO INC
S PEIRS, DONNA
S TORAGE SOLUTIONS
S ERRA, RACHEL
SENICAL, TERRY
SMITH & COMPANY, INC
S TUDER, JAMES E AND
SAVE THE MOMENT
S TOREFRONT SECURITY CLOSURES
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
TITLEIST
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL
TEAM EQUIPMENT, INC
TREASURE COAST ANIMAL CLINIC
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FL
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP
TURF MASTER TRACTOR AND MOWER
TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
THOMPSON, GABLE
TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
0319698 VERO MARINE CENTER, INC
0319699 VERO BEACH, CITY OF
MEDICAL CENTER
APRIL 2, 2002
-11-
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
763.07
70.00
60.97
515.00
500.00
183.46
90.12
101.08
276.00
120.72
200.59
202.81
722.60
1,433.00
107.97
188.35
218.50
45.00
1,923.08
7,404.07
80.00
1,930.65
124.78
881.50
16.36
229.00
117.74
175.00
407.95
6,506.76
58.43
63.82
270.00
650.00
950.00
500.00
126.00
210.37
38.62
35.00
599,037.77
4,997.00
97.00
2,153.00
6,350.07
242.89
19,550.00
2,338.66
15.00
115.00
195.27
414.32
1,958.00
197.00
274.49
7.52
935.38
14.63
22.50
94.12
853.84
1,736.01
34,338.58
596.50
76.16
124.95
30.48
1311
U
•
14.
•
O 319700 VIDEO PALACE
O 319701 VERO BEARING & BOLT
0319702 VERO HERITAGE, INC
O 319703 WADSWORTH, DENNIS "MITCH"
O 319704 WALSH, LYNN
O 319705 WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
O 319706 WAL-MART PHARMACY INC
O 319707 WILLHOFF, PATSY
0319708 WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
O 319709 WILSON GOLF DIVISION
O 319710 WASTE MANAGEMENT
O 319711 WELLS, BENNY MCNEIL
O 319712 W C G, INC
O 319713 WIDNER, BRADLEY J
O 319714 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE
O 319715 WESTERN WOOD PRODUCTS ASSOC
O 319716 XEROX CORPORATION
O 319717 XEROX CORPORATION
O 319718 YOUNG, JAMES P
O 319719 MILLER, JOSEPH
O 319720 WODTKE, RUSSELL
O 319721 RUDD, ALAN
O 319722 LICARI, LINDA
O 319723 ROYAL, THOMAS
O 319724 EVERETT, MELVIN
O 319725 SMITH, RICHARD L
O 319726 DE STEPHAN, JOYCE
O 319727 AMERITREND.HOMES
O 319728 ABELY, JANET S
O 319729 MC KAY, KEVIN A
O 319730 JAMES, JOHN
O 319731 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
O 319732 REXFORD INC
O 319733 ALMANZA, RIGOBERTO
O 319734 REISMILLER, ALAN
O 319735 CHRISTOFORI, NANNINO
O 319736 HEARNDON, SUSAN M
O 319737 LOCKHART, HEATHER
O 319738 CARVER, DEE AND
O 319739 CHESSER, PHILLIP 0
O 319740 HARBCO CONSTRUCTION INC
0319741 PRINCIPE, VINNIE
O 319742 BURCH, ASHLEY W
O 319743 FAILLA, CHRIS
O 319744 BANOV ARCHITECTURE
O 319745 HALL, DANIEL
O 319746
O 319747
O 319748
O 319749
O 319750
O 319751
O 319752
O 319753
O 319754
O 319755
O 319756
O 319757
O 319758
O 319759
O 319760
O 319761
O 319762
O 319763
O 319764
APRIL 2, 2002
HARRIGAN, CHRISTOPHER
FIKA, GEORGE
LAMB, EILEEN
KELLY, ELAINE
LEVITT, ROY
MC CLURE, ADREANA
MC KINLEY, TERRY
MANESS, EDNA
MARLIN DEVELOP
MATOLEK, LISA
NEIRA, ANDRES
NTP CONSTRUCTION
PALLAS, RICHARD
REXFORD BUILDERS
SNELLBAKER, JAMES
WILLIAMSON, BRIAN
FAIRWAYS
SHOWPLACE SIGNATURE
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
-12-
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
LJn
1,130.00
215.46
873.51
42.00
27.84
19.78
595.58
130.00
123.10
338.40
63.58
15.00
3,511.68
128.74
74.24
13.50
130.00
461.42
500.00
665.44
295.97
404.24
408.68
641.26
594.00
37.02
38.96
67.03
300.62
39.81
13.82
60.08
62.32
33.61
40.95
31.38
19.36
48.48
20.67
48.50
332.39
6--.75
64.03
41.23
267.78
21.72
22.47
26.41
60.25
30.36
31.78
24.28
21.53
19.15
34.15
21.97
20.06
9.59
29.29
15.61
31.78
21.72
55.76
23.55
511.07
•
O 319765
O 319766
O 319767
O 319768
O 319769
O 319770
PAVCO CONSTRUCTION
CHANNING CORP
CROOM CONSTRUCTION
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
AMERITREND HOMES
BEAZER HOMES
7. C. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2002:
•
92.53
29.17
51.94
631.75
34.46
15.63
2,052,419.31
TO:
DATE
SUBJECT:
FROM:
HONORABLE BOARD OF COUT
March 21, 2002
APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
TY COMMISSION
EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
ERS
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board,
for the time period of March 15, 2002 to March 21, 2002.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for March 15-21, 2002, as
recommended by staff.
APRIL 2, 2002
-13-
?
Q!?
st i , L I !3
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
O 319771
O 319772
O 319773
O 319774
0319775
O 319776
O 319777
0319778
O 319779
O 319780
O 319781
O 319782
O 319783
O 319784
O 319785
O 319786
O 319787
O 319788
O 319789
O 319790
O 319791
O 319792
O 319793
O 319794
O 319795
0319796
O 319797
O 319798
O 319799
O 319800
O 319801
O 319802
O 319803
O 319804
O 319805
O 319806
O 319807
O 319808
O 319809
O 319810
O 319811
O 319812
O 319813
O 319814
O 319815
O 319816
O 319817
O 319818
O 319819
O 319820
O 319821
O 319822
O 319823
O 319824
O 319825
O 319826
O 319827
O 319828
O 319829
O 319830
O 319831
O 319832
APRIL 2, 2002
ACTION PRINTERS INC
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
ABS PUMPS, INC
ACTION DIESEL INJECTION
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
ADAMS, FRAN B
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER, INC
A T & T
AMERICAS
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
AMERIPATH FL, INC
A T & T
APOLLO ENTERPRISES
ANCOR CORF INC.
AMERICAN RED CROSS
AKINS, JAMES
ASSOCIATES IN PSYCHIATRY
AT&T BROADBAND
AMERICAN ENGINEERING SERVICES
ALARM PARTNERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES, INC
BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY
BARTON,
BARNETT
BAKER &
BARTON,
BAKER &
BROOKS,
BREVARD
BREVARD
JEFFREY K -CLERK
BAIL BONDS
TAYLOR INC
JEFFREY K
TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
DONNA AND CITY OF VERO
BOILER CO
ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BELLSOUTH
BRADFORD, MADGE A
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
BMG
BRIGGS EQUIPMENT
BYERLY, DON
BELLSOUTH
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
CLEARFIELD COMPANY, INC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
CLIFF BERRY,INC
CES
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
CAPE PUBLICATIONS INC
CIGARS UNLIMITED INTERNATIONAL
CLEVELAND GOLF CO., INC.
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CUTTER & BUCK
CALLAWAY GOLF BALL CO
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CLARRY, ALISON
CARROLL, CLIFFORD B
-14-
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
%a
CHECK
AMOUNT
77.70
900.06
663.43
2,917.73
14,199.79
948.00
14.62
239.20
1,086.14
16.59
54.40
96.89
7.12
24.65
37.93
550.85
84.00
1,915.72
156.66
46.00
44.95
59,259.39
65.00
4,490.81
148,690.92
1,347.86
4,736.50
247.00
776.58
22,178.00
8,204.64
92.00
1,020.50
37.00
658.90
3,194.14
87.50
54.04
455.47
759.87
15.00
2,269.98
4,414.86
1,836.05
256.85
52.80
1,578.29
3,044.18
64.60
155.00
40.75
3.25
456.00
230.00
134.03
72.75
286.15
596.94
1,480.40
17.22
12.00
50.00
0319833 CREATIVE IMAGES
0319834 CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
0319835 CROWN, BARRY M
0319836 C A MECHANICAL, INC
0319837 CLEM, KAY
0319838 CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY
0319839 CENTRAL FLORIDA HAND CENTER
0319840 COASTAL BIO -SYSTEMS
0319841 C E M ENTERPRISES
0319842 COLUMBARO, FRED
0319843 COLUMBARO, RAY
0319844 DATA SUPPLIES, INC
0319845 DAVES SPORTING GOODS
0319846 DELTA SUPPLY CO
0319847 DEMCO INC
0319848 DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
0319849 DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
0319850 DON SMITH'S PAINT STORE, INC
0319851 DION, RITA
0319852 DELRAY STAKES & SHAVINGS INC
0319853 DILLER BROWN & ASSOCIATES, INC
0319854 DADE PAPER COMPANY
0319855 DESIGNED TRAFFIC
0319856 DE BLAKER, KARLEEN F
0319857 DETKO, CATHY
0319858 DILLON, EDWARD D
0319859 DUFFY, JOSEPH
0319860 DIGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC
0319861 DEAN, Ley
0319862 DILLON, GARY
0319863 DELL MARKETING L.P.
0319864 E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
0319865 EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
0319866 E G P, INC
0319867 EDUCATIONAL DIRECTORIES, INC
0319868 E D DESIGNER HATS
0319869 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
0319870 EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
0319871 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC
0319872 EVERGLADES FARM
0319873 ESTATE OF PETER SABONJOHN
0319874 FACTS ON FILE NEWS SERVICES
0319875 FEDEX
0319876 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
0319877 FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
0319878 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW
0319879 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
0319880 FOOTJOY
0319881 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
0319882 FLORIDA WATER RESOURCES
0319883 FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
0319884 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
0319885 FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
0319886 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT
0319887 FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
0319888 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
0319889 FLORIDA PARK POLICE
0319890 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
0319891 F V CASANO
0319892 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
0319893 FLORIDA HIKER MAGAZINE
0319894 FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
0319895 FRENCH, GEORGE
O 319896 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS
0319897 FLOYD, IRA MD
O 319898 FIRST LAB
APRIL 2, 2002
-15-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03_21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03_21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03_21
20
20
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-
2002-0
O 2-03-21
O 2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
2-03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
-03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
O 3-21
O 3-21
O 3-21
03-21
O 3-21
03-21
O 3-21
O 3-21
O 3-21
O 3-21
O 3-21
3-21
421.31
2,145.00
200.00
3,601.79
4,503.00
82.28
85.00
266.00
235,967.27
64.00
64.00
127.67
173.42
1,090.66
170.10
234.04
32,119.22
168.39
30.00
504.90
3,320.00
254.70
2,150.41
12.00
300.00
600.00
22.91
73.00
15.00
1,875.00
9,345.00
111.00
18.00
353.00
18.00
294.00
2,916.67
3,190.00
4,820.62
688.52
44.53
1,840.00
34.60
300.00
705.95
300.00
58,002.83
661.54
68.54
660.00
785.00
26.73
6,262.50
25.00
53.00
15.72
25.00
2,137.63
872.00
877.00
23.50
25.00
7,696.50
467.58
112.00
248.00
'r1 t c.
3
•
O 319899 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
O 319900 FLORIDA HEART
O 319901 FLESCHER, ROSEMARY
O 319902 FERRELLGAS
0319903 GALE GROUP, THE
O 319904 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
O 319905 GENE'S AUTO GLASS
O 319906 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
O 319907 GALL'S INC
0319908 GOLDCOAST ANESTHESIA ASSOC
O 319909 GRAPHIC DESIGNS INTERNATIONAL
O 319910 GALLAGHER, ARTHUR J & CO
O 319911 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
O 319912 GEISLER-STEINER, MARCIA J
0319913 HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC
O 319914 HICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT
O 319915 HIGHSMITH, INC
0319916 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
O 319917 HUDSON PUMP & EQUIPMENT
O 319918 HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER
O 319919 HARRIS SANITATION, INC
O 3199.20 HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
O 319921 HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
O 319922 HALLIDAY, TODD
O 319923 HERITAGE MICROFILM
O 319924 HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
O 319925 HURLEY,ROGNER,MILLER,COX AND
O 319926 HYATT REGENCY CHICAGO HOTEL
O 319927 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319928 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
O 319929 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH
O 319930 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319931 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
O 319932 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
O 319933 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
0319934 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC
O 319935 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES
O 319936 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
O 319937 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
O 319938 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319939 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 319940 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE
O 319941 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
0319942 IMI -NET, INC
O 319943 INGERSOLL-RAND FINANCIAL SERV
0319944 INDIAN RIVER HAND REHAB INC
O 319945 INDIAN RIVER WALK-IN CARE
O 319946 JANET'S AUTO TRIM & GLASS
O 319947 J & H WATERSTOP INC
O 319948 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
0319949 KELLY TRACTOR CO
O 319950 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
O 319951 POWELL, MARY
O 319952 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
O 319953 KELLY TRACTOR CO
O 319954 KURTZ, ERIC C MD
O 319955 KNOWLES, CYRIL
O 319956 KIRKUS REVIEWS
O 319957 KELLER, JENAE
O 319958 KIRBY VETERINARY HOSPITAL
O 319959 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC
O 319960 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
O 319961 LABOR FINDERS
O 319962 LESCO, INC
O 319963 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC
APRIL 2, 2002
-16-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
120.00
144.00
12.00
30.70
336.86
102.95
35.00
52.58
68.98
775.00
46.30
292.00
34,807.39
185.50
49.72
4,191.39
165.50
1,030.66
115.18
2,083.33
63,655.29
8,713.19
1,523.00
565.00
840.00
1,241.50
825.08
660.00
3,790.00
227.90
32.00
150.00
694.00
273.52
2,178.57
521.48
183.03
953.77
184.30
1,599.52
_ 1,050.10
76,100.63
1,019.05
2,600.00
7,310.16
307.80
252.00
175.00
10,406.60
1,333.74
17.34
2,968.12
14.77
332.38
106.14
59.00
1,039.84
385.00
38.62
15.00
32.84
812.17
1,470.40
141.89
142.57
O 319964 LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO
O 319965 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
O 319966 LONGEVITY REHAB CENTER
O 319967 LLOYD HOSKINS & PIERCE
O 319968 LABCORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
O 319969 MARINE RESCUE PROD, INC
O 319970 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
O 319971 MCCORKLE RADIOLOGY
O 319972 MIKES GARAGE
O 319973 MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS
O 319974 MUNICIPAL EOUIPMENT CO
O 319975 MAGANA, IGNACIO M D
O 319976 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
O 319977 MATRX MEDICAL INC
O 319978 MASTELLER & MOLER, INC
O 319979 MIZUNO USA, INC
O 319980 MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
O 319981 MAYR, SHARON
O 319982 MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE
O 319983 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC
O 319984 MERCURI, DEBRA
O 319985 MURPHY, DEBBIE
O 319986 MELBOURNE INTERNAL MEDICINE
O 319987 MALLAMS, JOHN H, PHD
O 319988 MIRACLE LACE VISOR INC, THE
O 319989 MOORE, VIVIAN
O 319990 MCGRIFF, APRIL
O 319991 NOLTE, DAVID C
O 319992 NORTON TIRE
O 319993 NU CO 2, INC
O 319994 NIKE USA, INC
O 319995 NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES
O 319996 NOWLIN, TIAIRA
O 319997 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
O 319998 OFFICE DEPOT, INC
O 319999 OSCEOLA PHARMACY
O 320000 ONEONONE
O 320001 PARAGON ELECTRIC, INC
O 320002 PARKS RENTAL INC
O 320003 PETTY CASH
O 320004 POSTMASTER
O 320005 POSTMASTER
O 320006 PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
O 320007 PROFESSIONAL TITLE OF
O 320008 PORT CONSOLIDATED
O 320009 RUSSELL PAYNE PAINTING,
O 320010 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
O 320011 PRESS JOURNAL
O 320012 PERSONNEL PLUS INC
O 320013 POWERWARE CORPORATION
O 320014 PAIN & ANESTHESIA, PA
O 320015 PESHA, JESSICA
O 320016 PICKERING, REBECCA LMT
O 320017 PARALEE COMPANY INC
O 320018 PREFERRED GOVERNMENTAL CLAIM
O 320019 PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
O 320020 PC -TRANS SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION
O 320021 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
O 320022 RINKER MATERIALS
O 320023 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC
O 320024 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
O 320025 R & G SOD FARMS
O 320026 REXEL CONSOLIDATED
O 320027 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
O 320028 RIVERSIDE LEASING CO
O 320029 REAM, CHARLES R
O 320030 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
INC
APRIL 2, 2002
-17-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
-03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
-03-21
-03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
- 03-21
3,977.90
322.25
929.00
45,000.00
16.00
705.90
38.43
19.00
215.00
4.21
455.00
500.00
72.62
505.69
7,200.00
2,125.32
154.65
70.38
175.00
93.00
100.92
313.32
35.15
442.70
117.22
106.20
190.55
6,546.00
1,136.94
94.16
69.34
4,266.11
15.45
281.64
1,652.89
239.24
119.00
1,750.00
133.50
55.91
38.00
15,000.00
55.00
386.43
22,043.56
3,236.25
322.22
133.35
570.00
2,985.10
533.52
38.62
216.00
1,780.36
275.00
400.00
410.00
38.00
197.50
364.50
212.90
70.00
10,962.07
664.14
614.00
125.00
243.40
r. n
'd".i
50
•
O 320031
0320032
O 320033
O 320034
0320035
O 320036
O 320037
O 320038
O 320039
O 320040
O 320041
O 320042
O 320043
O 320044
0320045
O 320046
O 320047
O 320048
O 320049
O 320050
O 320051
O 320052
O 320053
O 320054
O 320055
O 320056
O 320057
O 320058
O 320059
O 320060
O 320061
O 320062
O 320063
O 320064
O 320065
O 320066
O 320067
O 320068
O 320069
O 320070
O 320071
O 320072
O 320073
O 320074
O 320075
0320076
O 320077
0320078
O 320079
O 320080
O 320081
O 320082
O 320083
O 320084
O 320085
O 320086
O 320087
O 320088
O 320089
O 320090
0320091
O 320092
APRIL 2, 2002
R S MEDICAL
RIZIO, HOWARD
ROSS, ALAN ESQ
RICH, JOSEPH CPS
SAFETY KLEEN
S T LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
S TATE ATTORNEY OFFICE
S TURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
S UNRISE TRACTOR & EQUIPMNT INC
S UNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
S TEIL, HOLLY
SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
SAM'S CLUB
SKAGGS, PAUL MD
SMITH, GARY
SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
S EARS COMMERICAL ONE
S IMS, MATTHEW
SAM'S CLUB #6520
S TANBRIDGE, RUTH
S UNGARD MAILING SERVICES
S PHERION
S UNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC
SUMMERLIN SEVEN SEAS INC
S UNCOAST COUNSELING &
S TANFORD, MARGO
SERRA, RACHEL
S UNNYTECH INC- FL
STEPHENS, LARRY
SCHEURER, DEAN LMT
SARBAK, JOHN M MD
S TUBBS, MURIEL R
S TRONG CONCEPTS
TRI -SURE CORPORATION
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
TEXACO CREDIT CARD CENTER
TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING
TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC_, INC
TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FL
S CRIPPS TREASURE COAST
TREASURE COAST SPORTS
THELK, LOU
TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC
TILLIS, EDWARD
TIME CAPSULE
TEAM USA LLC
TESTAMERICA INC
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
URGENT CARE WEST
UPTON'S PRINTING
UNISHIPPERS
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC
LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES
ORTHOPAEDICS
BEARING & BOLT
BEACH POWERTRAIN
-18-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
nu
144.00
53.56
26.36
30.00
116.81
81.57
50.00
21.98
218.50
755.00..
103.95
1,250.00
379.95
17.00
283.68
596.36
983.94
195.75
45.00
42.00
11,656.52
117.50
118.25
395.00
537.50
9,708.50
38.62
97.52
462.00
144.00
118.00
20.00
614.00
247,304.43
41,487.20
3,942.02
2,751.00
10,709.92
824.00
2,082.00
3,413.47
112.00
40.08
75.95
175.00
91.50
3,164.00
12,463.60
13.50
19.10
24,689.84
1,197.00
232.45
26.06
1,287.03
2,183.79
9.35
29.60
26.00
174.00
503.82
72.03
51
•
O 320093
O 320094
O 320095
O 320096
O 320097
O 320098
O 320099
O 320100
O 320101
O 320102
O 320103
O 320104
O 320105
O 320106
O 320107
O 320108
•
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY CO, INC
WOODY'S PRINTING
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WHEELER PUBLISHING, INC
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
WORKERS COMPENSATION SEMINARS
WILLIAMS FAMILY MEDICINE
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WALGREEN COMPANY
W C G, INC
WHITE FACE ACRES COMPANY LLC
XEROX CORPORATION
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZIEGLER, MIKE
ZERO AMMUNITION CO INC
O 320109 KARLSSON, KAY
O 320110 WARREN, CHARLES
O 320111 COFFEY, SCOTT
O 320112 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
O 320113 MAJESTIC PARTNER OF V B LTD
O 320114 BROXTON JR., JAMES
O 320115 CHANDLER, MICHAEL AND
O 320116 LONG, CHRISTOPHER A. AND
O 320117 GHO VERO BEACH INC
O 320118 ALLEN, JOHN
O 320119 ALBRECHT, ROBERT AND
O 320120 MOB CONTSTUCTION INC
O 320121 OSHKOSH B'GOSH INC
O 320122 MC CUNE, BETTINA C
O 320123 HALE CONSTRUCTION
O 320124 BRANDT JR, DALE A AND
0320125 ELIAS, ANGEL
O 320126 MC FARLAND, JENNIFER AND
O 320127 STINSON, LOMA EVANS
O 320128 WILLIAMS, DAMON S
O 320129 MENDOZA, ERICKSON
O 320130 ARMSTRONG, COREY
O 320131 BOBBITT, MAX E
O 320132 PERKEL, BRIAN
O 320133 HAMILTON PLACE INC
O 320134 PRZYBYSZ, GERALD F
O 320135 SNYDER, EDWARD N
O 320136 HAVILAND, CONNIE
O 320137 TURNER, JANE R
O 320138 LOFF, MICHELLE J
O 320139
O 320140
O 320141
O 320142
O 320143
O 320144
O 320145
O 320146
O 320147
O 320148
O 320149
O 320150
O 320151
O 320152
O 320153
O 320154
O 320155
O 320156
O 320157
APRIL 2, 2002
JAMES, BETTY
0 BRIEN, MARK
MIGNONE, PATRICIA
BRAZELTON, JOHN
KORN JR., WILLIAM F
COLEMAN, DON
JENKS, RAYMOND AND SUSAN
HOMMELL,DEBBIE
BARTH CONSTRUCTION
K MART
JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS,
PAGE, DEBRA AND
HUESCA, JAIME
GHO VERO BEACH INC
ST LUCIE DEVELOPMENT CORP
ASH, SITYWANDRA
STINSON, BELL
SIZELOVE, JANICE
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
INC
-19-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
nh,
272.10
10.00
130.00
184.40
57.22
39.50
165.00
37.00
89,927.47
2,413.37
10,000.00
81,565.50
658.09
71.87
107.02
2,405.75
41.23
32.19
42.28
64.54
48.64
52.19
53.25
30.46
83.85
26.97
27.99
38.90
42.33
18.30
16.12
3.83
23.92
75.82
10.87
80.46
59.36
36.38
3.99
43.06
29.03
27.55
40.11
35,99
26.75
12.47
38.94
39.37
8.57
60.92
54.35
25.79
34.76
40.00
39.64
1,637.67
6.44
9.21
26.41
47.78
87.27
29.34
75.41
91.22
50.39
•
O 320158 BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
O 320159 FRANK LINCOLN INTERIORS, INC
O 320160 DEVINE, DON
O 320161 BURGOON BERGER CONSTR CO
O 320162 SILKEN GROUP
O 320163 GRANT, MELINDA A
O 320164 WINDSOR PROPERTIES
O 320165 STEWART, DAVID
O 320166 GASKIN, ERIC
O 320167 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
O 320168 BEERS, RAYMOND S
O 320169 MERRILL, CRAIG AND
O 320170 CAPPELEN, RICHARD C
O 320171 STENERSEN, NORMAN A
O 320172 KOWALSKI JR., JOHN E
O 320173 STEPHENSON, MOLLY
O 320174 ANDO BUILDING CORP
O 320175 HIGGINS, LISA M
O 320176 ART KRIEGER CONSTRUCTION
O 320177 RIVERSIDE CHURCH
O 320178 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
O 320179 PERUGINI CONSTRUCTION
O 320180 SCHAUMAN, KELLI
O 320181 MCDONALDS
O 320182 SEARLES, GEORGE
O 320183 STRAWSER, MARY AND
O 320184 POWELL, DEBORAH KAY
O 320185
0320186
O 320187
O 320188
O 320189
O 320190
O 320191
O 320192
O 320193
O 320194
O 320195
O 320196
O 320197
O 320198
O 320199
O 320200
O 320201
O 320202
O 320203
O 320204
O 320205
O 320206
O 320207
O 320208
0320209
O 320210
O 320211
O 320212
O 320213
O 320214
O 320215
O 320216
O 320217
O 320218
O 320219
O 320220
O 320221
O 320222
O 320223
APRIL 2, 2002
GLEASON, JAMES AND
SCALES BUILDING CORP
HALE CONSTRUCTION INC
VELDE, BRET
REESE, ADEN AND
STEVENS, STEPHANIE A
VERO BEACH MOTORSPORTS
BANOV ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTR
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
HINZMAN, FRANK D
MILLER, WALTER
AMERITREND HOMES
HUGHES, DIANE J
SEEGERS, TERRY L
SHARP, DARLENE
STREET, DAN
BACHMAN, SUSIE
LEBRECHT, CLINTON
HALL, ROBERT L
KNAPP JR., EUGENE E
BAKER, KEITH A
HAMILTON, THOMAS AND
CARMEL, LEON
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES INC
CHANNING CORP XXIX
COBUN, ROBERT H
ELLERMAN, KEITH
STEPHEN FIELDS CO INC
INGRASSIA, REGINA
MC DONALD PROPERTIES
KOENIG, MEGAN M
CARRILLO, JUAN JOSE
TRUMAN, ELIZABETH
HUFFMAN, JOYCE
GUSTAVSON, EDNA W
GOWER, DONALD
LANGEVIN, ALAN
LAVIN, PETER J
BOWERING, REGINA
-20-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
rot
Di'
85.43
45.94
59.81
149.69
42.69
6.10
91.56
66.67
38.94
175.51
16.83
33.41
51.21
35.14
31.31
87.15
51.17
58.36
25.06
56.75
144.34
33.65
80.02
25.20
77.59
95.31
41.66
42.25
36.87
50.30
33.66
41.44
33.87
500.00
102.87
52.54
8.29
30.77
97.62
26.32
35.52
46.99
8.98
19.29
37.29
39.83
80.05
28.15
36.14
42.48
95.07
10.64
29.09
59.79
26.62
39.57
37.26
35.59
59.63
36.54
72.74
67.88
70.97
48.90
59.44
41.52
• •
0320224 HOUSTON, STUART
O 320225 DE VEAU, GEORGE A
O 320226 ROODHOUSE, LISA
O 320227 FIRTH, KERRY
O 320228 CARNEY, GEORGE W
O 320229 BRESCIANI, BERTHA SOLEDAD
O 320230 DELAHOZ, JOSE
O 320231 CALI, MARIA ORTIZ
O 320232 KNIGHT, LAKESHIA
O 320233 SULLIVAN, BRIAN
O 320234 VAN WAGENEN, MICHAEL
O 320235 MARAVILLA, ROBERET
O 320236 AUBREY SILVEY ENTERPRISES INC
O 320237 PELICAN SHOPPES INC
O 320238 JOHNSON, CAROL K
O 320239 SELVINI, C J
O 320240 CASTELLANOS, ANNE
O 320241 HOLBORN, JENNIFER
O 320242 JENKS, BRETTON P
O 320243 READ, BONNIE
O 320244 MOYNIHAN, CHRISTOPHER
O 320245 DAVIS, RYAN
O 320246 MINER, RUSTY
O 320247 HALL, JAMES D
O 320248 DACKO, SUZANNE
O 320249 YORK, LESTER
O 320250 OLIVER, LAURA E
O 320251 ANDERSON, FRED
O 320252 BIEMANN, HERMAN
O 320253 BROXTON, LYDIA
O 320254 BAXTER, JERE L
O 320255 BEUTTELL, PETER M
O 320256 BILKEN GROUP
O 320257 BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
O 320258 BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
O 320259 BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY
O 320260 BROWN, HUBERT
O 320261 BABCOCK, DEAN
O 320262 BROWN, KIMBERLY AND FPL
O 320263 CORR, RHODA L
O 320264 C P E ASSOCIATES
O 320265 CAPAK, GERALD T
O 320266 CARONE, PAUL
O 320267 CAPPELLUTI, RICHARD
O 320268 CARLUCCI, LEONARD A
O 320269 DOOLITTLE,JAMES A & ASSOCIATES
O 320270 DOVE, E WILSON
O 320271 DOYLE, CHERYL
O 320272 DEEHAN, WILLIAM F
O 320273 EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
O 320274 EVANS, ALFRED
O 320275 FOGERTY, GEORGE A
O 320276 FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC
O 320277 FORD, ROBERT J
O 320278 GASKILL, ROBERT
O 320279 GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
O 320280 GRACE'S LANDING LTD
O 320281 HOLM, LEO
O 320282 HUNLEY, J MICHAEL
O 320283 JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSOCIATES
O 320284 JULIN, PAUL
O 320285 JOHNSTON, PATTIE
O 320286 JACKOWSKI, MICHAEL
O 320287 JONES, NICKETA AND FPL
O 320288 JONES, ALPHONSO
APRIL 2, 2002
-21-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
31.98
87.31
34.23
67.01
24.34
75.21
2.15
20.76
59.00
31.67
62.70
25.31
332.66
4.30
64.70
73.13
53.71
13.69
59.89
225.00
56.54
44.39
14.07
64.65
57.91
42.81
91.89
258.00
368.00
233.00
275.00
278.00
1,233.00
230.00
176.00
1,936.68
9-2.00
232.00
18.00
245.00
5,151.00
413.00
372.00
379.00
392.00
1,873.00
298.00
292.00
304.00
359.00
267.00
288.00
373.00
380.00
282.00
7,492.00
5,994.00
431.00
445.00
3,064.00
386.00
108.00
360.00
34.00
312.00
O 320289
O 320290
O 320291
O 320292
O 320293
O 320294
0320295
O 320296
O 320297
O 320298
0320299
O 320300
O 320301
O 320302
O 320303
O 320304
O 320305
O 320306
O 320307
O 320308
O 320309
O 320310
O 320311
O 320312
O 320313
O 320314
O 320315
0320316
0320317
O 320318
O 320319
0320320
O 320321
0320322
0320323
O 320324
O 320325
O 320326
O 320327
O 320328
O 320329
O 320330
O 320331
O 320332
APRIL 2, 2002
KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA
LAWRENCE, TERRY A
LANGLEY, PHILIP G
LLERENA, EDWARD D
LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
LAPPERT, ANN OR RONALD
LEIFER, BRUCE
LEWIS, CHARLES
M 0 D INVESTMENTS
MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
MALGERIA, PRISCILLA
MEAD, THOMAS H OR HELEN S
NORMAN, DOUGLAS OR BARBARA
ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND
PALMER TRAILER PARK
P IERSON, JOHN H DBA
PALUMBO, LOUIS
PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF
PRICE, GLORIA
REAGAN, WILLIE C
RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST
RIVER PARK PLACE
S T FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACH
SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR
STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY
SANDY PINES
S HELTON, ROBERT L
SANGBUSH, DONALD
STARCK, MICHAEL R
STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR
SUNDMAN, IVAN
TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING
THERIEN, RICHARD C
ULISKY, WILLIAM B AND
VERO FIRST CORPORATION
BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN)
WOODIN, RICHARD
WILLIAMS, EDITH
WESSENDORF, FRED
WOODS OF VERO BEACH
YORK, LILLY B
YORK, DAVID
ZANCA, LEONARD
-22-
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
2002-03-21
255.00
182.00
757.00
323.00.
8,859.00
307.00
445.00
245.00
1,000.00
234.00
434.00
328.00
372.00
905.67
277.00
617.00
440.00
439.67
241.00
732.00
292.00
7,267.00
2,830.00
313.00
298.00
393.67
7,534.00
205.00
375.00
387.00
275.00
371.00
246.00
307.00
37.00
1,281.00
314.00
391.00
286.00
459.00
7,856.00
249.00
408.00
590.00
1,748,471.77
7.D. METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE - RE-ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN ROBERT KEATING AND
VICE CHAIRMAN CHRISTOPHER MORA
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 26, 2002:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
DATE:
Vickie Phillips, Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical
Advisory Committee (MPO TAC) Secretary
March 26, 2002
SUBJECT: Reelection of MPO TAC Chairman and Vice Chairman
This is to notify the Board that at the MPO TAC meeting of March 22, 2002, the
Committee voted (9-0) to ratify the reelection of Robert Keating as Chairman
and Christopher Mora as Vice -Chairman of the MPO TAC for the year 2002.
No board action is required.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
APRIL 2, 2002
-23-
ra
Gii
t.:
•
7.E. ELECTIONS CANVASSING BOARD FOR 2002 - APPOINT COMMISSIONER
GINNAS ALTERNATE FOR CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 2002:
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: March 25, 2002
Subject: APPOINTMENT TO SERVE ON CANVASSING
BOARD FOR THE FALL ELECTION
From. Ruth M. Stanbridge
Chairman
I am unable to serve on the 2002 Fall Election Canvassing Board since I am on the ballot.
In my place I appoint Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn to serve as the Board's appointee.
Chairman Stanbridge noted that her memorandum should have asked the Board to
appoint an alternate member of the Canvassing Board and stated that she is merely
recommending that Commissioner Ginn be appointed.
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously appointed Commissioner Ginn to serve
in place of Chainnan Ruth M. Stanbridge, as
requested.
-24-
BK
7. F. OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL - 2002 NA CO ANNUAL CONFERENCE - NEW
ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - JULY 12-16, 2002 - COMMISSIONER MACHT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 27, 2002:
Date:
Subject:
From:
Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
March 27, 2002
Out of County Travel for Commissioner Macht to attend the
2002 NACo Annual Conference in New Orleans, LA — July 12-16, 2002
Kimberly E. Massung
Executive Aide to the Commission
Permission is requested for out of county travel for Commissioner Macht to attend the 2002
Annual NACo Conference to be held July 12-16 2002 in 1 ew Orleans, LA.
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved out -of -county travel for
Commissioner Macht to attend the 2002 NACo
Annual Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana, July
12-16, 2002, as requested.
-25-
flit
t�i�
•
7.G. RESOLUTION 2002-017 AMENDING THE COUNTY'S LOCAL HOUSING
ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR FY 2000-2001, 2001-2002 AND 2002-2003
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 26, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
N HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Developmen Directo
Sasan Rohani, AICP
Chief, Long -Range Planning
March 26, 2002
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN (LHAPlan)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 2, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Consistent with state requirements, Indian River County prepared and adopted its Local Housing
Assistance Plan (LHAPlan) in 1993. The LHAPlan not only qualified the county to receive State
Housing Initiatives Program (SHIP) funds, but also has served as the policy and procedural guide
for administering the SHIP program.
At this time, staff is proposing minor changes to the county's LHAPlan. One change will enhance
the use of SHIP funds as a match for Community Development Block Grant applications generally
and the Gifford Housing CDBG application specifically. The other proposed amendment is a minor
change to incorporate a state monitoring requirement for SHIP rental rehabilitation projects.
Since June of 1993, the county has provided 518 SHIP loans to individual applicants who applied
for assistance. According to state rules and regulations, as well as the county's requirements, SHIP
APRIL 2, 2002
-26-
Ei 1(fin q—
J.i
funds may also be used to supplement or match other state and federal funds
On October 23, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners authorized Community Development
Department staff to apply for a Housing Rehabilitation Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) for the east Gifford area. As part of the CDBG application, there is a need for a local
contribution. According to applicable regulations, SHIP funds may be used as a CDBG program
match and considered as a local contribution.
ANALYSIS
One of the goals of the county's local housing assistance plan is to maintain the county's existing
affordable housing stock and to repair substandard housing units. A source of funds for those
activities is the county's SHIP rehabilitation assistance program. Another source of funding is the
CDBG program. The CDBG program however, involves a competitive application process. In order
for the county to receive funding, the county must maximize its application points. Using up to
$350,000 of the SHIP rehabilitation funds from FY 2002-03 and FY 2003-04 as a match for the
Gifford. Housing CDBG application will provide the county's CDBG application with additional
points.
Currently, the county's SHIP rehabilitation loans are available to both very low and low income
households. Although deferred, these loans must be paid back when the assisted unit is sold. SHIP
Rehabilitation grants, however are currently available only to very low income households. A
rehabilitation grant must be paid back if the assisted unit is sold less than 10 years from the date the
grant is closed. After 10 years, the grant will be forgiven.
At this time, staff proposes to change the county's LHAPIan to allow SHIP rehabilitation grants to
be provided to low income households, but only when the SHIP rehabilitation grant is a match for
another housing program such as CDBG. Staff feels that more Gifford residents will be willing to
participate in the CDBG program if the SHIP assistance is in the foam of grants. Another proposed
change to the LHAPlan is a minor clean-up amendment to the plan to make it clear that, consistent
with state requirements, all rental assisted units must be monitored for 15 years to ensure rent
affordability and income eligibility for households occupying their units.
Revisions to the plan are shown on pages 29 and 30 of the plan (copy attached). Deletions are shown
as etruck thru and additions are shown as underlined.
ALTERNATIVES
With respect to the revised Local Housing Assistance Plan, the Board of County Commissioners has
three alternatives. These are:
adopt the revised plan
adopt the revised plan with changes
reject the revised plan
Staff supports the first alternative.
APRIL 2, 2002
-2 -
4
it yyr-� tr,
V Ll
•
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the proposed amendment of the county's Local Housing Assistance Plan by adopting the
attached resolution. Staff also recommends that the Board of County Commissioners set aside up
to $350 000 of SHIP funds from FY 2002-03 and 2003-04 as a match for the county's CDBG
application.
ATTACHMENTS
Adoption Resolution (including revised pages 29 and 30 of the LHAPIan)
Commissioner Ginn asked for an explanation of Item B(3) on Page 42 of the backup,
and Community Development Director Bob Keating noted that most of the assistance
provided under SHIP funds is for downpayment loans with deferred payments. However,
the regulations allow for providing rehabilitation loans and grants for persons with very low
incomes. Several months ago the Board approved a Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) for housing rehabilitation in the Gifford area. In order the maximize the points
earned, SHIP funds are used as matching funds to be given as a grant rather than a loan
because of the reluctance of residents to apply for loans.
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously set
aside up to $350,000 of SHIP funds from FY 2002-
03 and 2003-04 as a match for the county's CDBG
application and adopted Resolution 2002-017
amending the County's Local Housing Assistance
Plan for FY 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003.
-28-
•
RESOLUTION_NO 2002-J117
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE COUNTY'S LOCAL HOUSING
ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR FY 2000-2001, 2001-2002, AND 2002-2003.
WHEREAS, Chapter 420, Florida Statutes, describes the State
Housing Initiative Partnership Program (SHIP), and states that the
principal objective of that program is to increase the amount of
affordable housing within the State of Florida; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1993, Indian River County approved
ordinance number 93-13, establishing the Local Housing Assistance
Program; and
WHEREAS, the current county's Local Housing Assistance plan
expires on June 30, 2003; and
WHEREAS, The county's current Local Housing Assistance Plan
adequately addresses the county's affordable housing needs; and
WHEREAS, on April 2nd, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners
considered a proposed amendment to the county's Local Housing
Assistance Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida that:
Section 1.
The above recitals are ratified in their entirety
Section 2.
Pages 29 and 30 of the Indian River County Local Housing
Assistance Plan for FY 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003 are
hereby amended as shown in attachment "A" by the Board of
County Commissioners.
Section 3.
The Board of County Commissioners directs staff to submit two
copies of revised pages 29 and 30 of the Indian River County
Local Housing Assistance Plan to the Florida Housing Finance
Corporation by certified mail.
APRIL 2, 2002
-29-
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 017
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Ginn
and seconded by Commissioner Macht , and being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman, Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Vice Chairman, John Tippin
Commissioner, Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner, Fran Adams
Commissioner, Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
Affr-
AyP
A
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 2nd day of April 2002.
Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County
By:
Attest by:
la LI. 0 _
Jai frey K. Barton
C erk
.4 -
Ruth
Ruth Stanbridge, {hairman
BCC Approved: April 2, 2002
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY: � �- c(
William G. Collins, II
Deputy County Attorney
u\v\h\housing.res
APRIL 2, 2002
-30-
•
Attachment "A"
inspection by the corresponding jurisdictional Building
Department and the county designated inspector that all
required rehabilitation activities for the eligible
housing unit are completed. No SHIP funds will be paid
for any work completed prior to issuance of the notice to
proceed.
Besides general rehabilitation activities, funds may be
provided for emergency repairs. Emergency repairs
eligible for SHIP funding are limited to weatherization
activities. Weatherization means materials or measures
and their installation which are used to improve the
thermal efficiency of a residence. For emergency
repairs, only one written licensed contractor estimate is
n eeded. No credit verification is needed for emergency
✓ epairs.
Rehabilitation/emergency repair grants may be leveraged
with private funds, small city Community Development
B lock Grant (CDBG) funds, weatherization funds, HUD
t ransitional housing funds, and other state and federal
programs as appropriate.
b. Eligibility
APRIL 2, 2002
i Geographic Area
Rehabilitation grants may be made for eligible
housing units located anywhere in the County,
including all municipalities located within the
County.
ii. Housing Unit Classification
Eligible housing units receiving IRCLHAProgram
Rehabilitation Grants must be owner -occupied
single-family residences or multi -family
✓ esidential rental projects owned and managed by a
non-profit organization. Mobile homes are not
e ligible.
iii. Applicant Classification
(a) Rehabilitation grants may be awarded to the
following eligible persons:
1. Very Low -Income Eligible Persons
2. Non -Profit Organizations
3. Low -Income Eligible Persons only when the
rehabilitation grant is a match for
another housing program, such as the CDBG
program, HOME Investment Partnership
-31-
•
Program (HOME), or other state or federal
housing program.
(b) Rehabilitation grants shall result in eligible
housing for the following eligible persons:
1. Very Low -Income Persons
2. Low -Income Persons
c. Basic Award Terms
i Maximum Monetary Award
The maximum monetary award for a rehabilitation
grant shall not exceed $20,000.00 per each eligible
single-family housing unit. Rehabilitation grants
for multiple family structures shall be limited to
a maximum monetary award of $100,000 for 3 or more
unit multi -family rental building owned and managed
by a non-profit organization.
ii. Repayment Terms/Timeframe
The repayment of funds awarded as a rehabilitation
grant is not required, except in cases where the
assisted housing unit is sold prior to termination
of the unit's affordable classification timeframe
(10 years for owner -occupied units, 15 years for
rental units). In cases where the unit is sold,
the entire original grant amount must be paid back
at the time of resale of the unit.
iii. Interest Rate
There will be no applicable interest rate for
rehabilitation grants
iv. Affordable Classification Timeframe
Housing units whose owners receive funds from the
IRCLHAProgram Rehabilitation Grant Strategy Program
shall be occupied by the same qualified eligible
household who received the assistance for a period
of not less than ten years (10) years. Any multi-
family rental building rehabilitated with SHIP
funds provided pursuant to this strategy must be
owned and managed by the same non-profit
organization which receives the original assistance
for tcn (10) fifteen (15) years. For rental units,
the Indian River County SHIP office will monitor
rents and renters' income eligibility on an annual
basis for the 15 year life of rental rehabilitation
assistance grant period.
APRIL 2, 2002
-32-
nu
DA
7.IL SHERIFF - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL
JUSTICE GRANTS (EDWARD B YRNE MEMORIAL STATE AND L OCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAM - STATE
FISCAL YEAR 2003 ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING CERTIFICATE
OF PARTICIPATION - SUBSTANCE ABUSE ADVISORY COUNCIL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 19, 2002:
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE March 19, 2002
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM:
Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
1
SUBJECT: STATE FISCAL2003 ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING
CERTIFICATION &F PARTICIPATION
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS
Indian River County has been notified by the Flonda Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Office of
Criminal Justice Grants, that 5159,323.00 has been allocated in grant funds for State Fiscal Year 2003, to
fund local anti-drug abuse projects. The leder also requested that the Board of County Commissioners
serve as the coordinating unit of government in applying for these funds. The Substance Abuse Advisory
Council will be soliciting for and receiving grant applications, as well as evaluating those applications and
recommending to the Board what projects to fund and their funding levels. the Substance Abuse
Advisory Council's recommendations will be brought to the Board for approval in May.
The grant will continue to be funded 75% from the state and 25% from the county. The budgetary impact
on the county will not exceed 553,108.00. Staff has requested all matching funds for the 2002/2003 fiscal
year to be made by the grant applicants rather than the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of
County Commissioners would have to match the Substance Abuse Council portion since the grant
requirement recommended that the Board of County Comrrussioners set up the council to administer the
grant. Additionally, the Board of County Commissioners will provide the match for the Multi -Agency
Drug Enforcement Unit (M A C E) grants, since MACE is comprised of local governmental entities.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the invitation to serve as the
coordinating unit of government in the FDLE Anti -Drug Abuse Grant Program and authorize the Board
Chairman to sign the Certification of Participation naming Jason E. Brown, Budget Manager, as the
contact person.
APRIL 2, 2002
-33-
�61
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously accepted the invitation to serve as the
coordinating unit of government in the FDLE Anti -
Drug Abuse Grant Program and authorized the
Chairman to sign the Certification of Participation
naming Jason E Brown, Budget Manager, as the
contact person, as recommended by staff.
COPY OF CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.1. FLOODPLAIN CUT AND FILL BALANCE WAIVER - LOT 12, BLOCK 19,
VERO LAKE ESTATES UNIT 4 - HOLIDAY BUILDERS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 20, 2002:
0: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directo{—
AND JJ
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine
FROM: David B. Cox, P.E., Civil EngineerQ9G
SUBJECT:
Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 12, Block 19,
Vero Lake Estates Unit 4
REFERENCE: Project No. 2001110045-30323 CONSENT AGENDA
DATE: March 20, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Holiday Builders has submitted a building permit application for a single family residence on the
subject property. The site is located in an AF special flood hazard zone, base flood elevation 22.7 ft.
N.G.V.D. In the attached letter from the applicant's engineer dated March 18, 2002, a waiver of the
APRIL 2, 2002
-34-
cut and fill requirements requested The lot area is 1.06 acres The volume of the 100 year
floodplain displaced by the proposed grading plan is estimated to be 817 cubic yards.
ALTERATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4. of the Stonnwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots located in the
Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Alternative No. I
Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d).
Alternative No. 2
Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the
proposed floodplain displacement.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from Ronald G. Keller, P.E., dated March 18, 2002
2. Calculations for cut and fill
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the cut and fill balance
waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d),
as recommended by staff.
-35-
3 0
•
7. J. NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK PROJECT 9926 - INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD - UTILITY AND ROADWAY ACCESS EASEMENT
DEED AND USE AGREEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2002:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
DATE:
James Chandler, County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director'
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine
Utility and Roadway Access Easement Deed a d Use Agreement
North County Regional Park — IRC Project No. 9926
March 21, 2002
CONSENT
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIO
S
The North County Regional Park is under construction on CR 512 in Sebastian The park is adjacent
to the Sebastian River Middle School, which is owned by the School Board of Indian River County.
The School Board has agreed to give the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners a
perpetual, non-exclusive easement and right-of-way over, across, under and through the Easement
Areas described in Exhibits "A", "B", `C" and "D" of the attached agreement The easement areas
are to be used for ingress and egress for vehicular traffic to the Park Site and for the construction,
maintenance, repair and replacement of the urigation well and 4" force main located on the Sebastian
River Middle School Site.
RECOMME
DATION S
Staff recommends approval of the agreement described above and request the Board to direct the
Chairman to execute this agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
Utility and Roadway Access Easement Deed and Use Agreement
APRIL 2, 2002
-36-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams.
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Utility and Roadway
Access Easement Deed and Use Agreement and
authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended by staff
EASEMENT DEED AND USE AGREEMENT ARE
ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.K. INDIANTOWN COMPANY, INC. - DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL
(SLUDGE) AGREEMENT - CENTRAL REGIONAL WWTF
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of February 5, 2002:
DATE:
TO:
THIZU•
PREPARED AND
STAFFED BY:
SUBJECT:
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2002
JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
W. ERIK OLSON, DIR OF UTILITY SERVIC
STEVEN DOYLE, PE
INTERUM ASSISTANT DIR. OF UTILITIES
DOMESTIC WASTEWATER RESIDUAL (SLUDGE) AGREEMENT
FOR LNDIANTOWN COMPANY INC.
BACKGROUND:
Indiantown Company, Inc. desires to utilize the Central Residual Facility to dispose of residuals from
the Indiantown Company Wastewater Facility. Attached is an Agreement for Services to be provided by
the Indian River County Department of Utility Services for treatment and disposal of such residuals.
APRIL 2, 2002
-37-
•
ANALYSIS:
The County operates and maintains a publicly owned Residuals Management Facility (Dewatering
Facility), at the Central Regional WWlr, Flonda Permit # FLA -010434 001, which is capable of
accepting domestic wastewater residuals from outside sources. The facility has been given approval and
is operating under the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit, in compliance
with Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 62-640, to properly treat and dispose of domestic wastewater.
The Customer shall provide all transportation of residuals, and will be charged the prevailing rates as
shown on the Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates, Fees, and Charges, and attached to the Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Domestic Wastewater Residual Agreement as presented, and authorize the Chairman
to execute the same.
Commissioner Ginn noted that the. Utilities Advisory Committee is meeting on
Thursday of this week and she would like to see this item remanded to thein for their
recommendation.
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously remanded the item to the Utilities
Advisory Committee for their recommendation to
the Board.
-38-
71
7. L. FOREST LAKE SUBDIVISION - WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT - CHANGE
ORDER #1 AND REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT - TREASURE COAST
CONTRACTING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 20, 2002:
DALE: MARCH 20, 2002
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTYADMINISTRATQ
FROM: ERIK W. OLSON
DIRECTOR OF LTILITY SERVI
PREPARED AARON J BOWLES, P.E.
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
S OBJECT:
FOREST LAKE SUBDIVISION WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT
W[P NO. 473-169-501.00 / BID NO. 3032
LhDIAN RIVER COUNTY U.C.P.# 924
APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. I & REQUEST FOR FINAL P AYNLENT,
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners awarded Bid No. 3082 to Treasure Coast
Contracting (see attached agenda item and minutes -Attachment -A) in the amount of $173,435.07 to provide
water service and fire protection t� the above referenced project. The project is now complete and the
Department of Environmental Protection has issued clearance to begin connecting customers. The Department
of Utility Services is now prepared to make final payment to the Contractor.
ANALYSIS:
The Contractor was previously paid $130,922.60 for 75.5% of the original constriction cost. The bid
quantities used during the bidding process are based on estimated quantities. Change Order No. 1 adjusts the
estimated bid quantities based on actual quantities installed. Change Order no. 1 results in a net reduction of
$2,355.52. Change Order No 1 is presented as Attachment -B.
The change order reduction ($2,355.52) results in a 1.6% decrease to the originally approved contract and
adjusts the final contract amount to $170,579.55. Utilities staff is now requesting final payment to Treasure
Coast Contracting Inc in the amount of $39,636.95 including all retainage held.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve Final Payment including all retainage held, inclusive of Change Order No. 1, in the total amount of
$39,636.95 to Treasure Coast Contracting Inc. and authorize Chairman to execute the same as presented in
Attachment B.
APRIL 2, 2002
-39-
i2
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved final payment including all
retainage held, inclusive of Change Order No. 1, in
the total amount of $39,656.95 to Treasure Coast
Contracting, Inc. and authorized the Chairman to
execute the Request for Payment, as recommended
by staff
DOCUMENTATION IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. M. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF COURT -RELATED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 19, 2002:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of County Commissioners
Marian E. Fell, Assistant County Attorney
March 19, 2002
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors for the weeks of
February 4, 2002 through March 18, 2002. Listed below are the vendors and the amount of each court -related
cost.
VENDOR:
Maria -Barrow
Suncoast Counseling
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
Hammond & Smith, P.A.
Rick Swope Reconstruction
Medical Record Services
Michael Heisey, Esq.
Suncoast Counseling
Stephens & Associates, Inc.
Suncoast Counseling
APRIL 2, 2002
PAYMENT TYPE:
Court Interpreter
Clinical Evaluation
Public Defender Costs (Juvenile)
Public Defender Costs (Felony)
Public Defender Costs (Misd.)
Indigent Dependency Cases (41)
Indigent as to Costs
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Clinical Evaluation
Expert Witness
Clinical Evaluation
-40-
?1!!
Cir►
AMOUNT:
40.00
537.50
300.00
4,800.00
600.00
38,200.00
319.17
130.95
5.00
500.00
500.00
537.50
=7J z
Richard Ake, Clerk
Cristi Martin
Madge A. Bradford
Linda Seymour
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Madge A. Bradford
Madge A. Bradford
Pamela G. Phelps
Pamela G. Phelps
Reginald Penny
Natalie Wright&&&
Berta B.H. Bauchman
Center for Counseling
Texas Dept. of Public Safety
Indian River Memorial Hospital
William H. Frazier, M.D.
Medical Record Services
State Attorney Costs
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Witness Coordination
Witness Coordination
Court Interpreter
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Pubic Defender Costs
Expert Witness
Public Defender Costs
10.00
66.50
115.50
381.50
171.50
101.50
70.00
66.50
42.00
471.80
100.05
40.00
250.00
7.00
11.00
400.00
401.00
Brevard Co. Clerk of Court
Patricia B. Held
Indian River Co. Sheriff's Office
Smartcorporation
Madge A. Bradford
Patricia B. Held
Patricia B. Held
The Janosek Agency, Inc.
Court Reporters, Inc.
First National Bank
Unishippers
Brevard Co. Clerk
Suncoast Counseling
Marsha Ewing, Clerk
Hammond & Smith, P.A.
Leslie Huszar, M.D.
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
Madge A. Bradford
Terry Senical
Flinn Court Reporting
American Reporting
Donna Speirs
Madge A. Bradford
Madge A. Bradford
Robert L. Crowder, Sheriff
Medical Record Services
Suncoast Counseling
Kathleen DeBlaker, Clerk
City of Vero Beach
Suncoast Counseling
SAO Coutny Attorney
Stone's Transportation
Eleanor English
Carrie L. Carlisle
Julie Chill
Madge A. Bradford
Karleen F. DeBlaker
Madge A. Bradford
Unishippers
State Attorney County Account
Psychological Assoc. of Miami
Barry M. Crown, Ph.D.
Alan Ross, Esq.
Michael C. Riordan, Psy.D.
Total
State Attorney Costs
Transcription
Public Defender Costs
State Attorney Costs
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Indigent as to Costs
Transcription
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Clinical Evaluation
State Attorney Costs
Indigent Dependency Cases (22)
Expert Witness Fee
Public Defender Conflicts-Juv.
Public Defender Conflicts-Misd.
Public Defender Conflicts -Felony
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Indigent Dependency Costs
State Attorney Costs
Clinical Evaluation
State Attorney Costs
Public Defender Costs
Clinical Evaluation
Witness Coordination
Witness Coordination
Witness Coordination
Witness Coordination
Witness Coordination
Transcription
State Attorney Costs
Transcription
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Expert Witness
Expert Witness
State Attorney's Costs
Expert Witness
cc: Honorable Paul B. Kanarek, Circuit Judge
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
APRIL 2, 2002
-41-
11.00
119.00
26.25
12.80
143.00
385.00
87.50
40.00
62.00
9.30.00
17.78
5.00
537.50
2.00
20,600.00
200.00
600.00
900.00
9,000.00
101.50
35.00
293.00
43.00
126.00
59.50
147.00
20.00
226.54
612.50
12.00
30.48
337.50
1,433.00
270.00
651.26
87.00
12.00
49.00
12.00
38.50
26.06
50.00
400.00
200.00
26.36
637.50
587,870.80
•
7. N. CHASE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - MODIFICATION TO CONTRACT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS - CHASE MEADOWS
LLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 19, 2002:
Paul G. Banged, County Attorney*
William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney*
Marian E Feld, Assistant County Attorney
MEMORANDUM
*Board Certified, City, County and Local Government Law
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: i;A William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: March 19, 2002
SUBJECT: Chase Meadows Subdivision - Modification to Contract for
Construction of Required Improvements
On May 15, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners approved Contract for
Construction of Required Improvements No. SD -00 -06 -07 -CFC (93050013-
26511) in connection with the plat of Chase Meadows Subdivision. Sufficient
security in the form of a Letter of Credit was posted with Indian River County to
guarantee the installation of required improvements.
All required improvements have been completed with the exception of internal
sidewalks, and the developer has requested an extension of time to complete
those improvements to May 14, 2003. Developer agrees to extend the security
to August 14, 2003 and will reduce the amount to $17 910.10, representing
115% of the cost of construction of the internal sidewalk improvements. The
$17,910 10 amount has been approved by the Engineering Department.
APRIL 2, 2002
-42-
t vr�
iri E sc'
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the attached Modification to Contract for Construction of
Required Improvements No. SD -00 -06 -07 -CFC (93050013-26511) extending the
completion date to May 14, 2003 be approved, and that the Chairman of the
Board of County Commissioners be authorized to execute said Modification
provided, however, that the current security in place be extended to August 14,
2003 and is in an amount of not less than $17,910.10.
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the Modification to Contract
for Construction of Required Improvements No.
SD -00 -06 -07 -CFC (93050013-26511) extending the
completion date to May 14, 2003 and authorized the
Chaiiivan to execute same, provided that the current
security in place be extended to August 14, 2003
and is in an amount of not less than $17,910.10, as
recommended by staff.
MODIFICATION IS ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-43-
BR
•
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2002-016
ESTABLISHING NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES,
AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS);
CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS
FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 27, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
ENT HEAT) CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development I'rector
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: March 27, 2002
SUBJECT: Request to Adopt an Interim Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
Ordinance, Amending Section 971.44 and Various Sections of LDR
Chapter 911 [SECOND HEARING]
It is requested that the data herein presented be given foiinal consideration by the Board
of County Commissioners at its meeting of April 2, 2002.
BACKGROUND
On March 19, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners held the first of two public
hearings on adopting an interim wireless telecommunications facilities ordinance. At the
end of that hearing, the Board voted 5-0 to direct staff to make a few minor changes to
APRIL 2, 2002
-44-
rtJ ` 4r)
�r1
177
the ordinance and announced its intention to adopt the ordinance and terminate the
existing moratorium on applications for new towers at its April 2, 2002
regular meeting
(see attachment 41). Staff has made the changes it was directed to make and the Board
is now to adopt the revised ordinance (see attachment 42) and teznzinate the moratonum.
ANALYSIS
In accordance with the Board's direction at the March 19, 2002 hearing, the following
ordinance revisions have been made:
1) The citation in ordinance Section 3(b)(7) has been corrected to read 971.44W
(see page 17 of the revised ordinance)
2) The requirement for surrounding property owner mailed notice now specifies that
county staff will mail the notice (see page 28 of the proposed ordinance).
3) The provision that allows attached .facilities on pre-existing buildings and
structures now specifies that attachments can be made to industrial, hotel, multi-
family, institutional, and public buildings and facilities as well as
commerciaUindustrial buildings (see pages 32 and 33 of the revised ordinance).
Thus, the interim ordinance has been revised and is ready for adoption. Along with
adoption of the ordinance, the moratorium needs to be tezminated to allow applications to
be submitted and processed under the new ordinance.
As previously discussed, in upcoming months the Board will review and adopt a wireless
master plan and then adopt a "final" wireless facilities ordinance. The final ordinance
will allow for further adjustments to the subject interim ordinance, including a
requirement that applicants use "state of the art" and "least obtrusive" technology for new
facilities.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1) Adopt the attached wireless telecommunications facilities revised ordinance, and
2) Teuzzinate the moratorium on applications for new towers and related facilities to
allow submittal and processing of applications under the new ordinance.
Planning Director Stan Boling stated that this is an interim ordinance which can be
revised after adoption of the Wireless Master Plan.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
APRIL 2, 2002
-45-
Oh
n
f0
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously terminated the moratorium on
applications for new towers and related facilities to
allow submittal and processing of applications under
the new ordinance and adopted Ordinance 2002-016
establishing new requirements for wireless
telecommunications facilities, amending the
following chapters of the Land Development
Regulations (LDRs), Chapter 911, Zoning and
Chapter 971, Regulations for Specific Land Uses.
ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 016
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ESTABLISHING NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR WIRELESS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AMENDING THE
FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 911, ZONING; CHAPTER 971,
REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES; AND PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, CODIFICATION,
SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) BE
AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
A portion of the Section 911.06(4) table for agricultural and rural districts is
hereby amended to read as follows:
APRIL 2, 2
District
f •
..-o
n-..)
ML
A3-1
Transportation and Utilities
Airports and airstrips
S
S
S
S
facilities)
Communications
towers (Non -wireless
'=
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
P
P
P
P
P
80
special
feet or taller (see 971.44(4) for
critena)
S
S
S
s
S
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged P P P
Non -camouflaged P P P
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged A A A
Monopole (minimum of 2 users) A A A
Not camouflaged and not monopole A/S* A/S* A/S*
Over 150 feet.
All tower types (see 971.44(1) for
Special criteria) S S
P - Permitted use
A - Administrative permit use
S - Special exception use
* See 971.44 4 to determine whether the Administrative Permit or Special exception use
process applies.
The requirements of section 917.06(11), of the Accessory Uses and Structures Chapter,
shall apply to towers.
2For wireless commercial facilities regulations, see section 971.44(5).
B. A portion of the Section 911.07(4) table for single-family residential districts
is hereby amended to read as follows:
District
Utility
Communications towers (Non -
wireless facilities) i
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
Commercial
Up to 70 feet.
Camouflaged
Non -camouflaged
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
Monopole (minimum of 2
Users)
Not camouflaged and not
monopole
Over 150 feet:
All tower types 971.44(1)
(see for special criteria)
APRIL 2, 2002
P - Permitted use
A - Administrative permit use
S - Special Exception Use
For wireless commercial facilities regulations see section 971.44 5
A portion of the Section 911.08(4) table for multiple -family residential
districts is hereby amended to read as follows:
District
Communications towers Non -
wireless facilities) i
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
80 feet or taller 971.44(4)
(see for special critena)
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
Non -camouflaged
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
Over 150 feet.
P - Permitted use
A - Administrative permit use
S - Special exception use
For wireless commercial facilities re =ulations see section 971.44(5
APRIL 2, 2002
A portion of the section 911.09(4) table for mobile home districts is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Districts
Communications towers ('Non -wireless facilities
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
80 feet or taller (see 971.44(4) for special criteria)
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
Non -camouflaged
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
Monopole (minimum of 2 users)
Not camouflaged and not monopole
Over 150 feet:
All tower types (see 971.44(1) for special criteria)
P - Permitted use
A - Administrative permit use
S - Special exception use
For wireless commercial facilities re ulations see section 97144 (5
A portion of the Section 911.10(4) table for commercial districts is hereby
amended to read as follows:
District
Communications towers
Non -wireless facilities d
Amateur radio (accessory
use)
Less than 80 feet
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
Non -camouflaged
APRIL 2, 2002
70 feet to 150 feet:
District
Use
IL
IG
Camouflaged
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Monopole (minimum
of 2 users)
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Not camouflaged and
not monopole
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Over 150 feet:
Camouflaged
p
p
Non -camouflaged
P
All tower types (see
971.44(1) for special
criteria)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
Monopole (minimum of 2 users)
A
P = Permitted use
A = Administrative permit use
S = Special exception use
No industrial use shall be permitted in the CH district unless public sewer service
is provided to the subject property.
The requirements of section 917.06(11), of the Accessory Uses and Structures
Chapter, shall apply to towers less than 70'.
Standards for unpaved vehicle storage lots are found in section 954.08(6).
For wireless commercial facilities regulations, see section 971.44(5).
A portion of the Section 911.11(4) table for industrial districts is hereby
amended to read as follows:
APRIL 2, 2002
District
Use
IL
IG
Communications towers (Non -wireless
facilities)
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
p
p
80 feet or taller (see 971.44(4) for special criteria)
S
S
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
p
p
Non -camouflaged
P
P
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
A
A
Monopole (minimum of 2 users)
A
A
Not camouflaged and not monopole
A/S*
A/S*
Over 150 feet:
All tower types (see 971.44(1) for special criteria)
S
S
APRIL 2, 2002
P= Permitted use
A= Administrative permit use
S= Special exception use
1The requirements of section 917.06(11) of the accessory uses and structures chapter,
shall apply to towers less than seventy (70) feet.
`For wireless commercial facilities regulations, see section 971.44(5).
* See 971.44(4) to determine whether the Administrative Permit or Special exception use
process applies
A portion of the Section 911.12(4) table for conservation districts is hereby
amended to read as follows:
P= Permitted
A= Administrative permit use
S= Special exception
1All planned developments shall be reviewed and approved pursuant to the requirements
of Chapter 915, Planned Development.
2For wireless commercial facilities regulations see section 971.44(5).
* See 971.44(4) to determine whether the Administrative Perniit or Special exception use
process applies
APRIL, 2, 2002
District
Use
Con -1
Con -2
Con -3
Utility
Communications towers
(Non -wireless
facilities)'
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
p
p
p
80 feet or taller (see 971.44(4) for special criteria)
S
S
S
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
p
p
p
Non -camouflaged
_
-
-
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
A
A
A
Monopole (minimum of 2 users)
A
A
A
Not camouflaged and not monopole
A/S*
-
-
Over 150 feet:
All tower types (see 971.44(1) for special criteria)
S
-
_
P= Permitted
A= Administrative permit use
S= Special exception
1All planned developments shall be reviewed and approved pursuant to the requirements
of Chapter 915, Planned Development.
2For wireless commercial facilities regulations see section 971.44(5).
* See 971.44(4) to determine whether the Administrative Perniit or Special exception use
process applies
APRIL, 2, 2002
A portion of the Section 911.13(2) table for special districts is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Communications towers (Non -wireless
facilities)-
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
District
R-BCID
80 feet or taller (see 971.44(4) for special
criteria)
Commercial
Up to 70 feet
Camouflaged
Non -camouflaged
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
Monopole (minimum of 2 users)
Not camouflaged and not monopole
Over 150 feet:
P= Permitted
A= Administrative permit
S= Special exception
'The requirements of section 917.06(11), of the Accessory Uses and Structures Chapter,
shall apply to towers.
2For wireless commercial facilities regulations, see section 971.44(5).
1• A portion of the Section 911.13(3) table for special districts is hereby
amended to read as follows:
District
Utility Uses
Public and private utilities (limited)
Communications towers (Non -wireless
facilities)'
Amateur radio (accessory use)
APRIL 2, 2002
Less than 80 feet
80 feet or taller (see 971.44(4) for special
criteria)
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
Non -camouflaged
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
Monopole (minimum of 2 users)
Not camouflaged and not monopole
Over 150 feet.
P= Permitted
A= Administrative permit
S= Special exception
For wireless commercial facilities regulations, see section 971.44(5).
A portion of the Section 911.13(4) table for special districts is hereby
amended to read as follows:
District
Transportation and Utility Uses
Airstrips
Public and private utilities, limited
Communications towers (Non -wireless
facilities) -
Amateur radio (accessory use)
Less than 80 feet
80 feet or taller (see 971.44(4) for
special critena)
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
Non -camouflaged
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
Monopole (minimum of 2 users)
Not camouflaged and not monopole
Over 150 feet:
APRIL 2, 2002
P= Permitted
A= Administrative permit
S= Special exception
'The requirements of section 917.06(11), of the Accessory Uses and Structures Chapter,
shall apply to towers.
2For wireless commercial facilities regulations see section 971.44(5).
The introduction portion of Section 971.44(1) is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Non -wireless Ecommercial communications towers seventy (70) feet or more in
height (administrative permit and special exception). NOTE: Wireless facilities
are regulated under section 971.44(S)
L. LDR subsection 971.44(5) is hereby created, to read as follows:
"(5) Wireless commercial communications facilities (staff -level approval, administrative
permit, and special exception)
Sec. 1 Purpose and Intent and Siting Alternatives Hierarchy.
The purpose and intent of these regulations are to:
(a) Promote the health safety and general welfare of the public by regulating the
siting of wireless communication facilities, including satellite earth stations;
and
(b) Minimize the impacts of wireless communication facilities on surrounding
areas by establishing standards for location, structural integrity and
compatibility: and
(c) Encourage the location and collocation of wireless communication equipment
on existing structures thereby minimizing new visual, aesthetic and public
safety impacts, effects upon the natural environment and wildlife, and to
reduce the need for additional antenna -supporting structures. and
(d) Accommodate the _growing need and demand for wireless communication
services; and
(e) Encourage coordination between suppliers of wireless communication services
in Indian River County; and
(0 Respond to the policies embodied in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 in
such a manner as not to unreasonably discriminate between providers of
functionally equivalent personal wireless service or to prohibit or have the
effect of prohibiting personal wireless service in the County, and
Ig) Establish predictable and balanced regulations governing the construction and
location of wireless communications facilities, within the confines of
permissible local regulation, and
APRIL 2, 2002
(h) Establish review procedures to ensure that applications for wireless
communications facilities are reviewed and acted upon within a reasonable
period of time.
Siting of a Wireless Communications Facility shall be in accordance with the following
siting alternatives hierarchy:
Collocation on Existing Antenna Supporting, Structure;
Attached Wireless Communications Facility;
Replacement of Existing Antenna Support Structure;
Stealth Wireless Communications Facility
New Antenna Support Structure:
Sec. 2 Definitions.
For the purposes of this division, the terms and phrases listed below shall have the
following meanings:
(A-I)Ancillary Structures means forms of development associated with a wireless
communications facility, including but not limited to: foundations, concrete
slabs on grade, guy wire anchors, generators, and transmission cable
supports; however, specifically excluding equipment enclosures.
fir u-eumoing uevrce means a piece or pieces of
The
order
of
ranking, from highest
to lowest, shall
attached
be a, b, c, d
and
e.
Where
a
lower ranked
are free-standing
alternative
and
is proposed,
the
applicant
must
file
an
affidavit
demonstrating that
despite
diligent efforts
limited
to adhere
to
to
mesh
the
established
structure
hierarchy within
the
the
Geograph'c Search
climbing
pegs on
monopole
Area, as
determined
approved devices,
but excluding the
by a qualified radio
frequency engineer, higher ranked
wire.
options
are not
feasible."
Sec. 2 Definitions.
For the purposes of this division, the terms and phrases listed below shall have the
following meanings:
(A-I)Ancillary Structures means forms of development associated with a wireless
communications facility, including but not limited to: foundations, concrete
slabs on grade, guy wire anchors, generators, and transmission cable
supports; however, specifically excluding equipment enclosures.
fir u-eumoing uevrce means a piece or pieces of
equipment which
are
either
attached
to antenna
-supporting structure, or
which
are free-standing
and
are designed
to prevent people from climbing
the
structure These
devices
may include
but
are not
limited
to
fine
mesh
wrap
around
structure
legs, "squirrel -cones",
the
removal
of
climbing
pegs on
monopole
structures, or other
approved devices,
but excluding the
use of
barbed
wire.
(A-3) Antenna means any apparatus designed for the transmitting and/or
receiving of electromagnetic waves that includes but is not limited to
telephonic, radio or television communications Types of antennas include,
but are not limited to: omni -directional (whip) antennas, sectorized (panel)
antennas, multi or single bay (FM & TV), yagi, or parabolic (dish)
antennas.
TA -4) Antenna Array means a single or group of antennas and their associated
mounting hardware, transmission lines, or other appurtenances which share
a common attachment device such as a mounting frame or mounting
support.
APRIL 2, 2002
5 Antenna -Su
ortin
Structure means a vertical
of
metal wood or other substance with or without a foundation that is ford the
ex•ress •u •ose of accommodatin antennas at a desired hei *lit above
ade Antenna-su ortin structures do not include an device used to
attach antennas to an existin buildin unless the device extends above the
hi•hest •oint of the buildin. b more than twen 20 feet.
••
A-6) Attached Wireless Communication Facili
arra
B -I
that is attached to an existin
or device which attaches it to the buildin
ment enclosure which ma
existin
buildi
e
•
w
•
buildin
means an antenna or antenna
with an accom an in
•
•
ole
transmission cables and an
be located either inside or outside of the
An attached wireless communications facilit
rinci
considered to be an accesso
Brea
•
oint Technolo
wherein a s ecified oint on the
]east 5% reater than an other
anchor bolts and base late
of the mono
base
11
use to the existin
means
1
•
•
•
1
•
•
al use on a site
IS
the en ineerin • desi of a mono ole
mono ole is designed to have stresses at
oint alon the mono ole includin the
in the event of a weather induced failure
occur at the break
oint on the mono ole.
so that
ole the failure will
late or an
other
•
•
•
•
•
oint rather than at the
C-1) Colocation means a situation in which two or more different wireless
communication service roviders lace wireless communication antenna or
antennas on a common antenna-su ortin structure. The term colocation
shall not be a• flied to a situation where two or more wireless
communications service •roviders inde endent] lace e ui
existing building
•
•
• •
•
1
•
•
ment on an
C-2 Conical Zone means an area that extends outward from the outer ed e of the
Horizontal Zone with a radius distance e uivalent to five thousand two
hundred eighty 15 280) feet
•
D-1 Develo ment Area means the area occu ied b a wireless communications
facilit includin areas inside or under the followin an antenna-
su ortin structure's framework e ui ment enclosures ancilla
structures and access ways.
E E
•
ui
•
•
ment Enclosure means an
cabinets shelters
other similar structures. E
contain radio or other e
tion of wireless communication si
ui ment nor as habitable s
includin
rece
e
•
•
•
ui
ui
•
•
•
•
•
structure above the base flood elevation
re -fabricated or otherwise
•
edestals and
.ment enclosures are used exclusive)
ment necessa
ace
als
for
to
the transmission or
and not for the stora
'FAA means the Federal Aviation Administration
F-2 FCC means the Federal Communications Commission.
G-1 Gu ed means a st le
truss assembl corn
of antenna-su ortin structure consistin
osed of sections with bracin
•
• •
e
of
of a sin le
sections are attached to each other and the assembl • in so attached tohe a
foundation and su • • orted b a series of !_u wires that are connected to
anchors •laced in the ound or on a buildin•.
G-2 Glide Path means a ratio e
overall hei ht of vertical ro
ratio limits each foot of hei
horizontal distance measurement
APRIL 2, 2002
•
•
uation used for the
ections in the vicinit
ht for a vertical
•
•u •oses of limitin
the
of rivate at orts. The
ro'ection based u on a
•
•
•
-56-
o=�
(G-3) Geographic Search Area means an area designated by a wireless provider
or operator for a new base station facility, produced in accordance with
generally accepted principles of wireless engineering.
(1I--1) Horizontal Zone means an area longitudinally centered on the perimeter of
a private airport's runway that extends outward from the edge of the
primary surface a distance equivalent to five thousand two hundred and
eighty (5,280) feet.
(L-1) Lattice means a style of antenna -supporting structure that consists of
vertical and horizontal supports with multiple legs and cross -bracing, and
metal crossed strips or bars to support antennas.
(M-1) Monopole means a style of free-standing antenna -supporting structure that
is composed of a single shaft usually composed of two or more hollow
sections that are in turn attached to a foundation. This type of antenna -
supporting structure is designed to support itself without the use of guy
wires or other stabilization devices. These structures are mounted to a
foundation that rests on or in the ground or on a building's roof.
(P-1) Personal Wireless Service means commercial mobile services, unlicensed
wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services
as defined in the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
(P-2) Primary Surface means the area extending a distance of fifty (50) feet to
both sides of the centerline of a private airport's runway, and running the
distance of the runway.
(P-3) Public Antenna -Supporting Structure means an antenna -supporting
structure, appurtenances, equipment enclosures, and all associated ancillary
structures used by a public body or public utility for the purposes of
transmission and/or reception of wireless communication signals associated
with but not limited to• public education, parks and recreation, fire and
police protection, public works, and general government.
(R-1) Radio Frequency Emissions means any electromagnetic radiation or other
communications signal emitted from an antenna or antenna -related
equipment on the ground, antenna -supporting structure, building, or other
vertical projection.
(R-2) Replacement means the construction of a new antenna -supporting structure
built to replace an existing antenna -supporting structure.
(S -I) Satellite Earth Station means a single or group of satellite parabolic (or
dish) antennas. These dishes are mounted to a supporting device that may
be a pole or truss assembly attached to a foundation in the ground, or in
some other configuration. A satellite earth station may include the
associated separate equipment enclosures necessary for the transmission or
reception of wireless communications signals with satellites.
(S-2) Stealth Wireless Communications Facility means a wireless communications
facility, ancillary structure, or equipment enclosure that is not readily
identifiable as such and is designed to blend into its surroundings and be
aesthetically compatible with existing and proposed uses on a site and the
surrounding_ area A stealth facility may have a secondary function;.
Examples of stealth facilities include, but are not limited to the following:
church steeple, bell tower, spire, clock tower, cupola light standard,
flagpole with a flag, or tree
APRIL 2, 2002
(W-1) Wireless Communications means any personal wireless service, which
includes but is not limited to, cellular, personal communication services
(PCS) specialized mobile radio (SMR), enhanced specialized mobile radio
(ESMR) andpaging
rvzretess communication
Facility
(WCF)
means any staffed
or unstaffed
commercial
facility for the
transmission and/or
reception of radio
frequency signals or other
wireless
communications,
and
usually
consisting of an antenna or group of antennas, transmission cables,
and
equipment enclosures, and
may include
an antenna -supporting structure
The
following developments shall
be considered
as a Wireless
Communication Facility: developments containing new or existing
antenna -supporting structures, public antenna -supporting strictures,
replacement antenna -supporting structures, collocations on existing
antenna -supporting structures, attached wireless communications
facilities, stealth wireless communication facilities, and satellite earth
stations.
Sec. 3 Applicability.
(a) Except as provided for in subsection (b) below, this section shall apply to
development activities including installation, construction, or modification to
the following wireless communications facilities:
(1) Existing antenna -supporting structures; and
(2) Proposed antenna -supporting structures; and
(3) Public antenna -supporting structures; and
(4) Replacement of existing antenna -supporting structures; and
(5) Colocation on existing antenna -supporting structures; and
(6) Attached wireless communications facilities; and
(7) Stealth wireless communications facilities; and
(b) The following items are exempt from the provisions of this section
[971.44(5)], notwithstanding any other provisions contained in land use
regulations of Indian River County:
(1) Amateur radio antenna supporting strictures and antennas as provided
in Florida Statutes 125.561
(2) Satellite earth stations that are two (2) meters or less in diameter and
which are not greater than thirty-five (35) feet above grade; and
(3) Regular maintenance of any existing wireless communications facility
that does not include the placement of a new wireless communications
facility; and
(4) The substitution or change of existing antennas or antenna panels or
other equipment on an existing antenna -supporting structure provided
the substituted antennas or equipment meet building code requirements
APRIL 2, 2002
(including windloading) and provided such change does not increase
the overall height of the stricture; and
(5) Any existing or proposed antenna -supporting structure, antenna or
antenna arrays -with an overall height of thirty-five (35) feet or less
above ground level in non-commercial or non -industrial zoning
districts or seventy (70) feet or less above ground level in commercial
or industrial zoning districts; and
A government-owned
wireless
communications facility, upon
the
communications
declaration
of a state of
emergency by federal, state, or
such
local
as
government,
and
a written determination
of public necessity by
the
Director
of
are
Public
by
Safety: except
that
such
facility must comply with
all
Commissions and
federal
in accordance
and
state
requirements. No
wireless
communications
facility shall
Section 971.44(1.) and
be exempt
from the
provisions of this
division beyond the
Development
duration of the
state of emeraenry
Antenna supporting structures, antennas and/or
antenna
arrays for non
wireless
communications
facilities
such
as
AM/FM/TV/DTV
-
Broadcasting transmission
facilities
which
are
licensed
by
the
Federal
Communications
Commissions and
regulated
in accordance
with
LDR
Section 971.44(1.) and
Section 917.06
of
the
Land
Development
Regulations.
APRIL 2, 2002
Sec. 4 Uses by Land Use District.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) below, no wireless communications
facility shall be allowed in a particular zoning district except in accordance
with the table below.
Land Use
District
Colocation
A-1*
A-2
A-3
RFD
RS -1
RS -2
RS -3
RS -6
RT -6
RM -3
RM -4
RM -6
RM -8
RM -10
RMH-6
RMH-8
PRO
OCR
MED
CN
CL
CG
CH
IL
TG
Con -1
Con -2
Con -3
CRVP
R -SCID
Rose -4
AIR -1
PD
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Attached Facility
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Replacement of
Existing Antenna
Support Structure
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Stealth Facility
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
New Non -stealth
Facility
Special Exception
Special Exception
Special Exception
Staff Approval
Adm. Permit
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Note: A-1 zoned property within the Urban Service Area A -I zoned property lying South of S.R. 60 and East of 66nI Avenue and A-1
Prohibited
Staff A..roval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff A..roval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Staff Approval
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm, Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Special Exception
Special Exception
Special Exception
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Prohibited
Adm. Permit
Adm. Permit
Prohibited
Prohibited
S.R. 60 and C.R. 510 and East of 746 Avenue, shall be treated the same as RFD zoned property for the purposes
of this Section.
zoned property lying between
APRIL 2, 2002
(b) Within al] districts that the above table shows as "Prohibited" , new antenna -
supporting structures may be permitted as a special exception use, provided
that the antenna -supporting structure is owned by Indian River County and is
used for county communications, in accordance with the adopted wireless
master plan (see section 8, below).
Sec. 5. Development Standards.
These standards shall apply to the following types of Wireless Communications
Facilities:
(a) New Non -stealth Antenna Supporting Structures.
(1) Approval criteria for new antenna -supporting structures:
a. Setbacks.
1. Any new antenna -supporting structures, equipment
enclosures and ancillary stnictures shall meet the
minimum setback requirements for the land use district
where they are located, except that where the minimum
setback distance for an antenna supporting structure
from any property line is less than the height of the
proposed antenna -supporting structure, the minimum
setback distance shall be increased to equal the height
of the proposed antenna supporting structure., unless
the antenna -supporting structure ;has been constructed
using "breakpoint" design technology, in which case
the minimum setback distance shall be equal to 110%
of the distance from the top of the structure to the
"breakpoint" level of the structure. For example, on a
150 foot tall monopole with a "breakpoint" at 100 feet,
the minimum setback distance would be 55 feet (110%
of 50 feet, the distance from the top of the monopole to
the "breakpoint". However, in all instances, the
minimum setback distance from any occupied residence
shall be at least 300% of the height of the entire
proposed structure. Certification by a Florida
professional engineer of the "breakpoint 'design and
the design's fall radius must he provided together with
the other information required herein from an applicant
except for one vertical structure less than 4 inches in
diameter which extend no more than ten (10) feet above the
antenna support structure, antenna, and antenna array and
matches the color of the antenna and support structure.
APRIL 2, 2002
The
overall
height of any antenna -supporting structure,
antenna
and/or
antenna array, excluding
those
related
to
amateur
radio, shall
not
be greater than
one
-hundred
and
fifty
(150)
feet. Height
for all
purposes
in this
Section
shall
mean
the
linear distance
from the
ground
to
the
highest
physical point on the
Wireless
Communications
Facility
except for one vertical structure less than 4 inches in
diameter which extend no more than ten (10) feet above the
antenna support structure, antenna, and antenna array and
matches the color of the antenna and support structure.
APRIL 2, 2002
c. Construction.
New antenna -supporting structures shall have a monopole
type construction only, and shall not be guyed or have a
lattice type construction.
d. Structural Integrity.
1. The entire antenna -supporting structure and all
appurtenances shall be designed pursuant to the wind
speed design requirements of ASCE 7-95, including
any subsequent modification to those specifications;
and applicable building code requirements; and
2. The new antenna -supporting structure shall be designed
to accommodate the maximum amount of wireless
communications equipment, including that of other
wireless communication service providers. The exact
amount of potential additional equipment to be
accommodated shall be agreed upon during a pre -
application conference and recorded in the Letter of
Understanding resulting from the conference In all
cases, the minimum number of collocated facilities on a
new antenna -supporting structure between 80 and 119
feet tall shall be two (2), and for a structure between
120 and 150 feet tall shall be three (3).
Lighting.
New antenna -supporting structures shall be illuminated in
accordance with FAA requirements to provide aircraft
obstruction lighting, where required. Any such illumination
shall be by red lighting unless otherwise directed by the
FAA. Louvers or shields may be required by the county to
keep lighting from shining down on surrounding properties.
f. Colocation Feasibility.
1. No antenna -supporting structure shall be permitted
unless the applicant demonstrates that no existing
wireless communications facility can accommodate the
appfcant's proposed facility; or that use of such
exist'ng facilities would prohibit personal wireless
services in the area of the County to be served by the
proposed antenna -supporting structure.
2. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing
wireless communications facility could accommodate
the applicant's proposed facility may consist of any of
the following:
APRIL 2, 2002
(i) No existing wireless communications facilities
located within the geographic area meet the
applicant's engineering requirements.
(ii) Existing wireless communications facilities are
not of sufficient height to meet the applicant's
engineering requirements.
iii Existinwireless communications facilities do
not have sufficient structural stren th to su..ort
the applicant's proposed wireless
communications facilities and related
equipment
v The as.lieant demonstrates that there are other
limiting factors that render existin wireless
communications facilities unsuitable.
New antenna-su..ortin
alvanized a finish or other acce
com.atible color exce
regulations
structures shall maintain a
ted contextual or
t as re uired b federal rules or
n Radio Fre uenc Emissions.
The radio fre.uenc emissions shall com.1 with FCC
standards for such emissions.
i. Intensity Reouirements
1. The followinshall be considered as develo.ment area
and shall be re.uired to meet the setbacks and o.en
s. ace ratio re.uirements for the land use district and/or
habitat where the are located
The area beneath all e.ui.ment enclosures lus
The area of the antenna-su..ortin• structure
foundation at or above ale* lus
in The area beneath
ncilla structures • .lus
ortinstructure
Suitable .rotective anti -climb
hei ht of ei.ht 8 feet and/or
be re uired to .reserve securit
facilities and structures.
k_Land s
An avera.e of one cano
12 feet with six-foot s
understo
.lantin.
trees
hall b
fencin. with a minimum
anti-climbin devices shall
on wireless communication
tree -ht of twelve
minimum hei
read at time of
minimum hei
tower base/accesso
Credit shall b
tower base
buffered. The re
maximize screenin
lanti
of et
rovided for eve
structures' o
e given for existin
erimeter and ad. acen t areas that are bein
anted n
and two
2
feet at time of
30
ue fenced
feet of the
erimeter.
trees located between the
uired trees shall b
of the base area of the tower from the
attern to
APRIL 2, 2002
view of adjacent road rights-of-way and adjacent
residentially designated or residentially used properties.
Trees credited or planted to meet this screening requirement
shall be located on property under the control of the applicant
to ensure that the screening frees are preserved and
maintained. Shrubs and understory trees used to make the
fencing opaque shall be planted on the outside fence
•erimeter. Alternative landsca•in. •tans which .rovide for
the same average canoe and understo trees but •ro•ose
alternative siting on the parent tract of the proposed facility
may be considered and approved by the Planning Director,
provided the proposed alternative maximizes screening as
provided above.
The onl si • a : e that is • ermitted u • on an antenna -
supporting structure, equipment enclosures, or fence (if
applicable) shall be informational, and for the purpose of
identifying the antenna -supporting structure, (such as ASR
registration number) as well as the party responsible for the
o eration and maintenance of the facilit its current
address and tele hone number securit or safet sins and
property manager signs (if applicable). If more than two
hundred twen 220 volta.e is necessa for the o•eration
of the facilit and is •resent in a :round d or in the
tower, signs located every twenty (20) feet and attached to
the fence or wall shall dis •la in lar • e bold hi h contrast
letters (minimum height of each letter: four (4) inches)
the following: "HIGH VOLTAGE - DANGER "
m. Aircraft Obstruction.
In addition to the provisions of Section 5(a)(1) above, the
overall height of a new antenna -supporting stricture
located in the vicinit of a rivate ai .ort shall be limited
by the fo_ 11_ owing•
A 35:1 Aide •ath ratio in the Horizontal Zone
limitinthe hei:hts of new antenna-sue•ortin
structures antennas and/or antenna arras to one
hundred fifty (150) feet within one (1) statutory
mile (5,280 feet) from the edge of the private
airport primary surface; and
i A 12:1 Aide •ath ratio in the Conical Zone
limitin_ the hei'hts of new antenna-sus.ortin
structures to six hundred (600) feet within one
(1) statutory mile (5,280 feet) from the edge of
the Horizontal Zone.
(iii) This subsection shall NOT apply to any structure
proposed to be located within the Airport
Overlay Zone as set forth in Section 911.17 of
this Code, which provisions shall supercede
those of this subsection (m)
APRIL 2, 2002
n. Adverse Effects on Adjacent Properties
d
averse effects on adjacent properties than the facility,
configuration, and location proposed.
2. The following attributes shall be considered from
vantage points at adjacent properties, roadways and
occupied structures:
(i) Height and location; and
(ii) Mass and scale; and
(iii) Materials and color; and
(iv) Illumination; and -
(v) Existing and proposed vegetation and
intervening structures.
An applicant shall demonstrate through the photo -
simulation requirements under Subsection (2)(i) hereinbelow that
the project design employs each of these attributes in a manner that
minimizes adverse effects to the greatest extent feasible to achieve
the wireless service capabilities demonstrated to be necessary
under subsection 5(a)(1 )n.
(2) Submittal requirements for new non -stealth antenna supporting
structure applications:
APRIL 2, 2002
a. A completed application form and any appropriate fees; and
b. Three (3) sets of signed and sealed site plans; and
c. A property card for the subject property from the Indian River
County Property Appraiser's Office or a tax bill showing the
ownership of the subject parcel; and
d. A form indicating that a property and/or antenna -supporting
structure's owner's agent has authorization to act upon their
behalf (if applicable); and
e. A signed statement from the antenna -supporting structure's
owner or owner's agent stating that the radio frequency
emissions comply with FCC standards for such emissions; and
f. Proof of an FCC license to transmit and/or receive radio signals
in Indian River County; and
g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, azo stamped or sealed
structural analysis of the proposed antenna -supporting structure
prepared by a licensed Florida engineer indicating the proposed
and future loading capacity of the antenna -supporting structure -
and
New
antenna -supporting structures shall
be configured
and
located
in
a manner
that
shall
minimize
adverse
effects
including visual
impacts
on
adjacent properties.
The applicant shall
demonstrate
that
alternative
locations configurations, and
facility types
have
been
examined
and
shall
address
in narrative
form
the
feasibility of
any alternatives
that
may
have fewer
d
averse effects on adjacent properties than the facility,
configuration, and location proposed.
2. The following attributes shall be considered from
vantage points at adjacent properties, roadways and
occupied structures:
(i) Height and location; and
(ii) Mass and scale; and
(iii) Materials and color; and
(iv) Illumination; and -
(v) Existing and proposed vegetation and
intervening structures.
An applicant shall demonstrate through the photo -
simulation requirements under Subsection (2)(i) hereinbelow that
the project design employs each of these attributes in a manner that
minimizes adverse effects to the greatest extent feasible to achieve
the wireless service capabilities demonstrated to be necessary
under subsection 5(a)(1 )n.
(2) Submittal requirements for new non -stealth antenna supporting
structure applications:
APRIL 2, 2002
a. A completed application form and any appropriate fees; and
b. Three (3) sets of signed and sealed site plans; and
c. A property card for the subject property from the Indian River
County Property Appraiser's Office or a tax bill showing the
ownership of the subject parcel; and
d. A form indicating that a property and/or antenna -supporting
structure's owner's agent has authorization to act upon their
behalf (if applicable); and
e. A signed statement from the antenna -supporting structure's
owner or owner's agent stating that the radio frequency
emissions comply with FCC standards for such emissions; and
f. Proof of an FCC license to transmit and/or receive radio signals
in Indian River County; and
g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, azo stamped or sealed
structural analysis of the proposed antenna -supporting structure
prepared by a licensed Florida engineer indicating the proposed
and future loading capacity of the antenna -supporting structure -
and
h. One original and two (2) copies of a survey of the property
completed by a licensed Florida engineer which shows all
existing uses, structures, and improvements; and
i. Three (3) copies of a vegetation survey or Habitat Evaluation
Index (HEI); and
j•
Photo -simulated post construction renderings of the proposed
amenna-supponmg structure, equipment enclosures, and
ancillary structures
coverage of
existing wireless
as they would
and
that
look
after
construction
from
to demonstrate radio
locations
to
be determined
during the
area, coverage prediction, and design
pre
-application
a certification
conference
(but shall, at
a minimum include
radiofrequency engineer
that
rendenngs
the
from
the
vantage point of any adjacent roadways
and
occupied
commercial
or residential
structures), as well
as
photo -
simulations
of the
antenna supporting structure
after
it
has
been
fully developed with
antenna structures (applicant
may
assume
for the
purpose of the
simulation
that
other
antenna
structures
on the
facility will
resemble
their
proposed structure
in size and
design), and
k. Prior to issuance of a building permit, proof of FAA
compliance with Subpart C of the Federal Aviation Regulations
Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace; and
1. A signed statement from the antenna -supporting structure
owner agreeing to allow the colocation of other wireless
equipment on the proposed antenna -supporting structure; and
m. If required by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service a
letter indicating that the proposed antenna -supporting structure
and appurtenances are in compliance with all applicable federal
rules and regulations; and
n. All other documentation, evidence, or materials necessary to
demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval criteria
set forth in this chapter and, including for non -stealth facilities
over 70 feet in height, where applicable:
1. existing wireless communications facilities to which the
proposed facility will be a handoff candidate, including
latitude, longitude, and power levels of each;
2
a ram()
frequency plot indicating the
coverage of
existing wireless
communications sites,
and
that
of
the
proposed site
sufficient
to demonstrate radio
frequency
search
area, coverage prediction, and design
radius,
together with
a certification
from
the
applicant's
radiofrequency engineer
that
the
proposed
facility's
coverage or capacity potential cannot be achieved by
any higher ranked alternative such as collocation,
attached facility, replacement facility or stealth facility,
and that the proposed facility's height is the minimum
necessary to reasonably meet coverage and/or capacity
needs; and
APRIL 2, 2002
-66-
bR•
-r` tl G
A t
.rior to issuance of a buildin. .ermit a statement b a
•ualified .rofessional en 'neer s.ecif inthe desi'n
structural failure modes of the .ro.osed facili and
4. antenna hei_hts and .ower levels of the
facilit and all other facilities on the sub'ect .ro
5. a statement from the a..licant that demonstrates that
alternative locations confi.urations and facilit t .es
have been examined• and addresses in narrative form
the feasibilit of an alternatives that ma have fewer
adverse effects on ad acent ro.ernes than the facilit
confi ' uration and location . roosed includin • but not
limited to:
Li)
Hei) eht and
(ii) Mass and scale. and
(ill) Materials and color; an
{LLB and
v Information addressin
the followi
the extent f an
develo
Geoer;
items
commercial
within
hic Search Area of the
proposed facility•
the .roximit of the structure to
residen
anytial dwellings•
the .roximi of the structure to
any public buildings or
facilities•
the existence of tall and like
structures within the Geo
Search Area of the
structure-
uired for an
new antenna -
At the time a .re-a..lication conference is held the a..licant shall
demonstrate that the followin . notice was mailed via certified mail to
all interested .arties includinother wireless service .roviders
licensed trovide service within Indian River Count as indicated on
the list of wireless service .roviders and interested rties .rovided b
the Indian River Count Plannin_ De.artment:
"Pursuant to the reuirements o the Indian River Coun Land
Develo.ment Re lations name o .rovider is hereb .rovidinou
with notice o our intent to meet with the Indian River Coun
Plannin. De artment in a .re -a .lication con erence to discuss the
location o a ree-standin . wireless communications acili that would
be located at location
In eneral we .Ian to construct
a sus sort structure o eet in heitht or the .0 .
o wireless service
.e
Plannin . De
wireless
artment
acilities or
ou have an
oseo .rovidin•
Please in orm us and the
desire or .lacin . additional
2 miles o our .ro.osed
ment within two
acili . Please
business da s a
appreciated
Sincerel
provide us with this in nation within twen • 710
ter the date o this letter. Your coo.eration is sincerel
lication a
licant wireless srovider
APRIL 2, 2002
83)
of theproposed
Included
with
the
notice
shall
be the
latitude
and
longitude
(NAD
structure
Within
twenty (20)
days
of
receiving
a timely
response from an
interested
potential co -applicant,
the
applicant shall
inform
the
respondent and
the
planning division
in writing as to
whether
or not
the
co -location
is acceptable and
under
what
conditions
If
the
co -location
potential
is not
acceptable, then
the applicant must
provide the
respondent
and
the planning
division
written
justification as
to why the
co -location
is not feasible.
(4) For all structures requiring a special exception use, all property owners
within six hundred (600) feet of the property boundary where the proposed structure will
be constructed shall receive from county staff written notice of the application via
certified mail, and all property owners between 600 and 1200 feet shall be notified by
staff via regular U S. Mail.
(b) Replacement of an Existing Antenna -Supporting Structure.
(1) Approval criteria for replacement antenna -supporting structures
a. For a proposed replacement antenna -supporting structure to be
approved it shall meet the approval criteria d., e. g. through j.
and 1. as indicated in Section 5(a) (1), as;well as the following:
b. Setbacks.
1. Any new equipment enclosures shall meet the
minimum setback requirements for the land use district
where they are located; and
2. Replacement antenna -supporting structure foundations
constructed on a property or properties which is/are
contiguous to the RS, RM, RT or RMH zones shall not
be any closer to these zones than the foundation of the
original antenna -supporting structure being replaced.
1. Replacement antenna -supporting structures, antennas
and/or antenna arrays shall not exceed the height
requirements set forth in §5(a)(1)b. or 110% of the
height of the antenna -supporting structure it is
replacing, whichever is greater:
d. Construction.
Subject to the height provisions above:
1. Replacement antenna -supporting structures, antennas
and/or antenna arrays with an overall height of one -
hundred and seventy five (175) feet or less shall have a
monopole type construction.
2. Replacement antenna -supporting structures with an
overall height of greater than one -hundred and seventy
five (175) feet, may be of the same construction type as
the structure being replaced.
APRIL 2, 2002
e. Landscaping.
An average of one canopy tree (minimum height of twelve
(12) feet with six-foot spread at time of planting) and two (2)
understory trees (minimum height of eight (8) feet at tin -ie of
planting) shall be provided for every thirty (30) feet of the
tower base/accessory structures' opaque fenced perimeter.
Credit shall be given for existing tree located between the
tower base perimeter and adjacent , areas that are being
buffered. The required trees shall be planted in a pattern to
maximize screening of the base area of the tower from the
view of adjacent road rights-of-way and adjacent
residentially designated or residentially used properties,
without conflicting with any guy wires. Trees credited or
planted to meet this screening requirement shall be located on
property under the control of the applicant to ensure that the
screening trees are preserved and maintained. Shrubs and
understory trees used to make the fencing opaque shall be
planted on the outside fence perimeter. Alternative
landscaping plans which provide for the same average
canopy and understory trees but propose alternative siting on
the parent tract of the proposed facility may be considered
and approved by the Planning Director, provided the
proposed alternative maximizes screening as provided above.
(2) Submittal requirements for replacement antenna -supporting structure
applications:
a. For a proposed replacement antenna -supporting structure
application to be considered complete, it shall contain the same
submittal materials required as indicated in Section 5(a)(2) a.
through i., k., 1. and n (1) through (4).
(c) Colocations on an Existing Antenna -Supporting Structure.
(1) Approval criteria for colocations on existing antenna -supporting
structures:
a. For a colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure to
be approved, it shall meet with approval cntena h. through j.,
and 1. as indicated in Section 5 (a) (1), as well as the following:
b. Height.
A colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure
shall not increase the overall height of the antenna -
supporting structure, antenna and/or antenna array beyond
that allowed under Section 5(a)(1)b.
c. Structural Integrity.
Any colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure
shall meet building code requirements (including
windloading).
(2) Submittal requirements for colocation on an existing antenna -
supporting structure applications:
APRIL 2, 2002
a. For a colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure
application to be considered complete, it shall contain submittal
materials a. through f. and n.(1) through (4) as indicated in
Section 5 (a) (2), as well as the following:
1. A stamped or sealed structural analysis of the existing
antenna -supporting structure prepared by a licensed
Florida engineer indicating that the existing antenna -
supporting structure as well as all existing and proposed
appurtenances meets building code requirements
(including windloading) for the antenna -supporting
structure.
2. A copy of the lease or sublease between the owner of
the antenna -supporting structure and the applicant
seeking to place additional wireless equipment on the
structure. Clauses related to lease term or rent may be
deleted or censored.
(d) Attached Wireless Communications Facilities.
(1) Approval criteria for attached wireless communications facilities:
a. For a proposed attached wireless communications facility to
approved, it shall meet with the approval criteria h., i., and 1 as
indicated in Section 5 (a) (1), as well as the following:
b. Accessory Use.
An attached wireless communications facility shall be an
accessory use as defined by Section 901.03 in the Land
Development Regulations; and
The antenna, antenna array, attachment device,
equipment enclosure and/or any ancillary equipment
shall not extend above the highest point of the building
by more than seventy (70) feet and
2. Existing or proposed attached wireless communications
facilities which project more than seventy (70) feet
above the highest point of the building upon which it is
mounted shall be considered as an antenna -supporting
structure and subject to the provisions for these types of
uses pursuant to Section 5 (a); and
d. Construction.
Attached facilities may have a guyed, lattice, or monopole
type construction, but in no case shall a lattice type
construction exceed a height of ten (10) feet from the base
of the attached facility; and
Color.
All attached antenna or antenna arrays, equipment
enclosures and ancillary equipment visible from outside the
building where they are located shall be painted so as to
blend in with the building where they are placed; and
APRIL 2, 2002
f. Screening and Placement.
Attached
wireless
communications
facilities shall
be
screened
by a parapet or other
device
so as to
minimize
its
visual
impact
as measured
from
the
boundary
line of
the
subject property Attached
facilities
shall
be
placed
in
the
center of
the
building where
reasonably
possible
so as to further
minimize visual
impact:
and
2. An attached wireless communications facility shall be
attached only to a commercial/industrial, industrial,
hotel, multifamily, institutional, or public building or
facility.
(2) Submittal requirements for attached wireless communications facility
applications:
a. For a proposed attached wireless communication facility
application to be considered complete, it shall contain
submittal materials a through f., h. and n. (1) through (4) as
indicated in Section 5(a)(2).
(e) Stealth Wireless Communications Facilities.
(1) Approval criteria for stealth wireless communications facilities:
a. Setbacks.
1. Stealth facilities shall meet the minimum setback
requ'rements for the zoning district where they are
located for the type of structure used or simulated.
Stealth wireless communications facilities shall not exceed
one hundred fifty (150) feet in overall height The county
may limit the height of a proposed stealth facility to ensure
that the facility is not readily identifiable as a wireless
facility, blends into its surroundings, and has the
appearance of an allowable and customary structure on site
(e.g. church steeple, flagpole w. th flag, light standard tree).
c. Construction.
No stealth wireless communications facility shall be guyed
or have lattice type construction.
d. Accessory Use.
A stealth facility shall be an accessory use as defined by
section 901.03 in the Land Development Regulations.
e. Structural Integrity.
The stealth facility shall be designed to meet all building
code requirements (including windloading).
APRIL 2, 2002
f. Aesthetics.
No stealth facility, whether fully enclosed within a building
or otherwise, shall have antennas, antenna arrays,
transmission lines equipment enclosures or other ancillary
equipment that is readily identifiable from the public
domain as wireless communications equipment.
(2) Submittal requirements for stealth wireless communications facilities:
a. For a proposed stealth wireless communications facility
application to be considered complete, it shall contain
submittal materials a. through j. and n. 1 through 4, contained
in Section 5(a)(2) as well as a photo -simulated post
construction renderings of the proposed stealth facility,
equipment enclosures, and ancillary structures as they would
look after construction from the public domain. Said photo -
simulations must demonstrate that the placement, design and
height of the proposed facility satisfies the definition of
`Stealth Wireless Communications Facility".
b. For a proposed stealth wireless communications facility that is
not ground -mounted the Planning Director may waive certain
submittal requirements to reflect the necessary documentation
required to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of this
chapter.
c. For a stealth wireless communications facility proposed to
exceed a height of 70 feet, the applicant shall satisfy the
informatio 1a1 and technical analysis required under section
5(a)(2)n.
Sec. 6. Expert Review.
Where
due
to
the complexity of the
methodology or analysis required to
review
an
application
for a wireless
communication
facility
requiring special
exception use approval or a radio
frequency analysis, the
Planning
Director
may require a
technical
expert
review by a
third
party expert,
the
costs
of
which
shall
be
borne
by the
applicant, which
sum shall
be in add'tion
to site
and
special
exception
use fees Applicant shall
submit
a deposit of
plan
$2,000.00
towards
the
cost of such
technical
review upon notification
from
the
Planning
Director
that
a technical
review is required, and
shall
remit
any
outstanding
balance
to
the
County
for such
review (not to
exceed
a
total
cost
of
$3,000.00)
to
issuance of
a building permit
The
technical
expert
review
shall
_prior
be completed
within
45
days of county staff
receipt of
a complete
application
and
technical
analysis
and
justification
from
the
applicant.
(b) The expert review may address any or all of the following:
(1) The accuracy and completeness of submissions;
(2) The applicability of analysis techniques and methodologies;
(3) The validity of conclusions reached;
(4) Whether the proposed wireless communications facility complies with
the applicable approval criteria set forth in these regulations; and
APRIL 2, 2002
-72-
t
•
5 Other matters deemed b the Plannin Director to be relevant to
determmin• whether a •ro•osed wireless communications facilit
com lies with the rovisions of these re ulations.
•
•
c Based on the results of the ex
chan es to the a
DO
icant's a
• •
ert review the Plannin
lication or submittals.
(d The a. •licant shall reimburse the Coun
the date of recei •t of an invoice for ex
ex•ert s review of the a••lication.
reimbursement
until paid in full
Sec. 7. Abandonment.
d
•
•
within fiftee
•
Director ma re
1
5 worki
da
enses associated with the third
Failure b the a licant to make
•
•
uire
sof
a
ursuant to this section shall abate the
a In the event all le all a roved use of a
has been discontinued for a eriod of s
deemed to be abandoned. Determination
made the Plannin Director who sh 11 h
and/or affidavits from the facilit
OS
•
SO
endin • a. • lication
n wireless communications facili
ix 6 months the facilit shall be
of the date of abandonment shall be
a ave the ri ht to re
owner re
communications facilit usage mcludin
communications facility is imminent.
•
uest documentation
ardin. the issue of wireless
evidence that use of the wireless
b At such time as the Plannin• Director reasonabl determines that a wireless
communications facilit is abandoned the Plannin Director shall •rovide the
facilit owner with written notice of an abandonment determination b
certified mail. Failure or refusal b the owner to res•ond within sixt 60
da s of recei•t of such notice shall constitute .rima facie evidence that the
wireless c
communications facility has been abandoned.
If the owner of the wireless communications facilit fails to res
demonstrate that the wireless communications facilit
shall be considered abandoned and the owner of the facilit
120
use of the wireless communications facilit
communications facilit
within the one-hundred-twent
wireless communications facilit
facilit
an additional one hundred twent
•
and or fails to
is not abandoned the
shall have
ireactivate the
or transfer the wireless
to another owner who makes actual use of the facilit
or dismantle and remove the
da
s within which to:
-da
Prior to issuance of a buildin
the underlying property owner shall acknowledge in writing, in a manner
acce table to the count attorne 's office his or her res onsibilities as the
TO
•
•
eriod
11
ermit for a wireless communications facili
•
ert
owner to
•
erform or contract to
with dismantlin• and .ro•erl
wireless communications facilit
Sec. 8. Wireless Master Plan
An a
• .
removin
licant for a wireless communication facilit
"Plan" . Partici
Count 's Wireless Master Plan
have a ublic hearin
•
assessed the ex
to
•
a
develo
•
buildin
•
•
•
•
•
erform and
and dis
•
•
a
osin
ma elect to
•
all costs associated
of an abandoned
•
artici
•
ate in the
ants in the Plan will not be re•uired to
on an •ro.osed facilit included in the Plan and will not be
ert review fee set forth in 971.44 5 Section 6 above but will be re•uired
ermit fees and the wireless master lan fee established below To
s consultant shall use si • al • ro • a • ation
•
and maintain the Plan the Coun
APRIL 2, 2002
-73-
,12;
i
•
methods and rofessional en ineers ua
with all federal state and local re ulations. U
at •ublic hearines to the Count Plannin
Coun Commissioners for ado tion b
Plan the a• .licant ma a. •1 for necessa
on an as needed basis. Should the need
Plan an a licant ma
may be assessed.
•
•
lified in this disci cline and assure com liance
on com letion the Plan shall be resented
and Zonin Commission and the Board of
ordinance or resolution. After ado 'bon of the
buildin •ermits for Plan -a• .roved facilities
occur for modifications after a..roval of the
•
•
•
•
•
. •
•
In ormation to be
etition the Count for such modifications but an additional fee
•
t t corbel
e in the Pn
shall rovide all necessa e and e uested ag informatts who ion to the Count is consultant
which information shall include at a minimum that set forth in 971.44 5 Section
5 a 2 n 1 4 above for each wireless facilities site which it currentl
•
within the
Count as well as each site area within which it reasonabl believes
t it
will need a facili within the Count for at least the next two 2 ears.
Plan Develo
subsectio
which will s
1
ment' and Use. U
above the Count
ec f
•
on submittal
s consultant s
areas within the Count wh
w reless communications facilit b
staff a. *royal and obtaimn . issuance of a buildin
s ecifications set forth in the Plan as a roved fo
of the fore
hall develo
ere an a
filin a site
A
••
lication
er a
and
1
ee re
•
11
•
• •
oin information in
and refine the Plan
licant ma
construct a
lan a. •lication and obtainin_
ermit in accordance with the
r that . articular site area.
uired. The fee for artici ation in the Plan shall be
•
..licant which shall be a one-time fee for review of the a
ro Pa
lication is submitted with the information set forth in
•
osed facilities in the Count
made at the time the a
•subsection (1) above
Plan Su
s
a
•
. •
ent of the a
.•
••
6 000.00
licant's exlstin
lication fee shall be
ercedes Processes Established in 971.44
ecified in the Plan shall re
• .
wire staff
roved wireless facilities irres
located and without the necessit
s ecified in the Plan which are on
•
•
5
royal onl
ective of the zonin
of further
•
re
ardless
buildin
Count
f zonin
•
classification
ermit for such facilit
for such site u
•
ne
roowned or controlled b
licant shall
otiate and execute a lease a
ert
All
OS
roved site areas
for the construction of
distnct in which the site is
For those areas
ublic heann
the
•
•
the Count
nor to seekin
on terms and conditions a
SO
a
reement with the
roved b the Count
2. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are
hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. All special Acts of the legislature applying
only to the unincorporated portion of the Indian River County which conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
3. Codification
The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the County Code and the word
' Ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the
sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered to accomplish such
intentions.
APRIL 2, 2002
-74-
r'
•
4. Severability
If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional inoperative or void, such holdings shall not affect the
remaining portions hereof and it shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to
pass this ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part.
5. Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Secretary of State.
This ordinance was advertised in the
March , 2002, and on the 25th
be held on the 19th day of
Apr i 1 , 2002, at which time at
Commissioner Adams
Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 8th day of
day of March , 2002, for public hearings to
March , 2002, and on the 2nd day of
the final hearing it was moved for adoption by
seconded by Commissioner
Macht , and adopted by the following vote:
The ordinance was adopted by a vote of:
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B Adams
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this
2nd day of April ,2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Attest: J.K. Barton, Clerk
Bet!_ , ‘. By:M
Deputy Clerk ' Ruth M. Stanbridge
Filed with the Florida Department of State on thelrman BCC Apprdaed Apri 1 2, 2002
day of
2002.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
4
GGc
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M. eating, AI P
Community Development Direc or
Coding: Words in are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions.
\\FILESERVER\PUBLIC\Community Development\Users\CurDev\ORDIANCE\wireless
ordinancepzc31402.doc
APRIL 2, 2002
_ / J
61(
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2002-018 AMENDING
THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER DO APPROVED BY THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT DRI
PROJECT FORMERLY KNOWN AS VILLAGE GREEN
WEST & VILLAGE GREEN SOUTH SUBSE
1
UENTLY
KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE NORTH & COUNTRYSIDE
SOUTH AND NOW KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE MOBILE
HOME PARK VERO PALM ESTATES MOBILE HOME
PARK AND BLUE WATER SUBDIVISION - BLUE
WATER REALTY LLC
1
uasi-Judicial
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 2002:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator DATE: March 25, 2002
FROM:
SUBJECT:
ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert
M. eating, "
Community Development Di ector
4.5.
Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
Blue Water Realty, LLC's Request for a Minor Change to the Village
Green/Countryside DRI Development Order
It is requested that the data herein presented be given foinial consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 2, 2002.
APRIL 2, 2002
-76-
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
On August 19, 1981, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a development order (D.O.)
approving the development of regional ( impact (DRI) at that time as Village Green West and
Village Green South p
That DRI approval allowed development of 1,448 mobile homes on 317.5
acres of land located south of S.R. 60 and west of 82nd Avenue. Currently, the DRI project area
includes the Countryside and Vero Palms mobile home parks (see attachment #1
In 1994, the D.O.
Owas amended to reduce the total number of residential units on the 317.5 acre site
to 1,283, said units to consist of 1,163 mobile homes and 120 single f
family homes were approved for a 46.55 acre portion of the overall Dr a project amity homes. The 120 single -
as "Sable Trace". That "Sable Trace" project was never developed, andte the vacant 46.55 ac eonown site
was sold to another developer Now, the current developer of that 46.55 acre site, Blue Water Realty
(LLC), is requesting a change to the D.O. to allow a mix of single-family
rather than single family homes only. No increase in the total number oftnits (120) foromes andbile the homes
46.55
acre site is proposed.
Pursuant to FS 380.06, which governs DRIB, the county may determine that the request does not
constitute a substantial deviation to the approved DRI development
in staff's opinion, the request does not constitute a substantial devi tion If the Board oft Couthat,
nty
Commissioners determines that the proposed change does not constitute a substantial deviation, then
the request will be treated asa proposed change or "minor amendment".
a change in an approved D.O. can be made by the Board of CountyAs a minor amendment,
vote and recommendation from the Treasure Coast Reg Commissioners Council ( without a fozznal
Regional Planning Council (T.C.R.P.C.).
The Board is now to dete mine whether the request does or does not constitute a substantial
deviation. If the Board determines that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation, then
it can take action to approve or deny the amendment proposal.
.ANALYSIS:
The proposed change would result in 64 mobile homes on a 22.54
(Residential Mobile Homes, up to 8 units/acre)and 56 singe homesacetract zoned acre tract
zoned RS -6 (Residential Single Family, up to 6 units/acre). The request conforms to current zoning
,i family on a 24.01 tract
boundaries and densities, and would result in the same number of units (120) already allowed on the
46.55 acre site The request also conforms to the preliminary approval
December 13, 2001. That approval was for the Bluewater Subdivision Phase 1,
granted which approved 56
single family lots on the 24.01 acre RS -6 zoned portion of the 46.55 acre tract. As proposed, the
Phase 2 RNIH-s zoned 22.54 acre portion of the 46.55 acre tract will not be developed until site
plan
and subdivision approval are obtained in the future for 64 mobile home Lots.
• Determination: Not a Substantial Deviation Request
Both county and T.C.R.P.C. staff have concluded that the proposed change will not create
any additional impacts (see attachment #3), and that under FS 380.06 the request should not
be treated as a substantial deviation. Thus, the request should be considered to not constitute
a substantial deviation.
•
APRIL 2, 2002
0SG
-77-
• Effects of the Amendment
As with all other D.O. amendment requests, the requested a
through adoption of a resolution (see attachment #5 mendmhe will become effective
)
resolution would allow 64 mobile home u if adopted, the proposed amendment
g units on Phase 2 of the proposed Bluewater
Subdivision (see attachmentale family homes on Phase 1
#4).
Subdivision, and would allow 56 sinof the Bluewater
Neither county staff nor the reviewing
5 agencies object to approval of the proposed D.O. amendment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Determine that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation, and
2. Adopt the attached resolution amending the Village
e
the requested change proposed by Blue Water RealtyLLC.
ry side O. to allow
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
�• pp iNOPC A 1'
3. cation Excerpts and Proposed D.O. Changes
Letter from Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
4. NOPC Development Plan for the Bluewater
5. Resolution Subdivision (Phases 1 & 2)
—_ rwa�ld
APRIL 2, 2002
CG
S.R. 60
A:2.1 =isaa-p}ana
as mass as a,1 ------------
•
�_ 1 _
■ •• 1 s
RMH-8 43
tr 701 ail a�1_
tat
�� j Countryside
I Mobile Home
Park
siaaliamIllallellitall am La
,pI 1
DRI Boundary
n
LATEwooDcw.=
VLLACE H P
la IM KS{
RMH-8
CIE
11111
1
MEW
04
a
aginza
c Ij
aif¢'
ea
la'['>a m s W zvaca1224 ra fa £4 Zara MAI
r41,116'1°42_
J;n4] j RMH-8 1
Le
`y
s-., al119J s� Mitt) i j'r i
f - s ra z34 nu
zu
--�1 Vero Palm states ®�
Mobile Hone Park r a
i
1 RMH-89
II It a
r
Ri1/41H-8
1
I �
I� 1
1
1
12th Street
= a �
0.414
- / V
i.
ta '4090
IRC Hospital
District
Site
an 20/21 =3 ti eLM 123 ir1lit
RMH-8
,n
1
1
1 LINE LEGEND
1 Subdivision Bndy
I Zoning Bndy
ins tae DRI Bndy
3
2
1
E3
3
1
3
Planning Director Stan Boling commented that this is a minimal amendment for the
original DRI approved in 1981. The southern portion of the property is still undeveloped.
The eastern portion of that southern portion will consist of UO single-familyunits
the western portion will allow mobile homes. There is no change in the total number of
units.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously determined that the request does not
constitute a substantial deviation and adopted
Resolution 2002-018 amending the Development
Order (DO) approved by the Board of County
Commissioners for the Development of Regional
Impact (DRI) project formerly known as Village
Green West & Village Green South, subsequently
known as Countryside North & Countryside South
and now known as Countryside Mobile Home Park,
Vero Palm Estates Mobile Home Park, and Blue
Water Subdivision.
APRIL 2, 2002
•
-79-
;s
�'r2
rLl L
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 018
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE
DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DO) APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) PROJECT FORMERLY KNOWS AS
VILLAGE GREEN WEST & VILLAGE GREEN SOUTH,
SUBSEO LY KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE NORTH &
COUNTRY SIDE SOUTH AND NOW KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE
MOBILE HOME PARK VERO PALM ESTATES MOBILE HOME
PARK AND BLUE WATER SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 Florida Statutes, the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County Florida has adopted Resolution 81-59
(adopted August 19, 1981) establishing the Development Order (DO) and approving the
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the project formerly known as Village Green
West & Village Green South, subsequently Hew known as Countryside North &
Countryside South and now known as Countryside Mobile Home Park, Vero Palm
Estates Mobile Home Park, and Blue Water Subdivision
WHEREAS, one of the project developers, .::: . - : - ,. „:.
RI
Realty LLC, has formally applied for and has agreed to certain changes Water
the
development approval relating to the Master Development Plan for the overall DRI
project;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida that:
1. The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed• changes to the DRI
plan,, th„e-bei44-e" and to the DO do not constitute a substantial deviation
pursuant to Chapter 380 of the Florida Statutes.
2. The notification of proposed change application and materials submitted on behalf
of the developer, along with subsequent and related staff and applicant
correspondence are hereby incorporated by reference into the Application for
Development Approval (ADA) for the project.
3. All conditions and restrictions specified in the project Development Order
(Resolution 81-59) shall remain in full force and effect.
4. The Master Development Plan as shown in Exhibit 12-2 (Revision 1) attached, is
hereby added to the project and approved for residential and commercial
development, subject to paragraph 14 of this resolution.
Coding: Words in are deletions from the previous D.O. resolution. Words underlined are 1
additions.
APRIL 2, 2002
-80-
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 018
5. The build -out date for the overall DRI project is hereby established as December
31, 2005. The termination date for the overall DRI project is hereby established
as December 31, 2010.
6. The annual reporting date, which is the responsibility of all property owners
within the DRI is August 19th of each year. Contents of the report are to include
those items required in Florida Administrative Code Rule 9J -2.025(7)(a -j). The
annual report shall be submitted to:
a. Florida Department of Community Affairs
b. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
c. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
d. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
e. St. Johns River Water Management District
7. The termination date is established as the date until which local government
agrees that the approved DRI shall not be subject to down -zoning unit density
reduction, or intensity reduction unless the local government can demonstrate that
substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the Development
Order have occurred, or that the Development Order was based on substantially
inaccurate information provided by the developer, or that the change is clearly
established by local government to be essential to the public health, safety, or
welfare
8. The present owners of record of the land within the DRI consists of:
(Note: all previous owner information has been updated with the information
below)
Countryside Mobile Home Park
02-33-38-00001-0110-00001.0 (main parcel)
MHC Financing LTD PTNR TWO
Two North Riverside Plaza #800
Chicago IL 60606
Vero Palm Estates Mobile Home Park
11-33-38-00001-0010-00001.1
Maple Wood Apts LLC
1400 90th Ave.
Vero Beach, FL 32966
Blue Water Subdivision
11-33-38-00001-0010-00001.0
Blue Water Realty, LLC
P.O. Box 260027
Pembroke Pines, FL 33206
•
Coding: Words in fttzpikethfetitsh are deletions from the previous D.O. resolution. Words underlined are
additions.
APRIL 2, 2002
2
-81-
Lt
iJ 2I
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 018
11-33-38-00001-0070-00001.0
11-33-38-00001-0070-00002.0
Indian River County Hospital District
1000 36th St.
Vero Beach, FL 32960-4862
11-33-38-00001-0080-00001.0
Indian River County Emergency Services
1840 25 h St.
Vero Beach FL32960-3384
9. There will be 1,163 1.227 mobile home units and 420 56 single family homes for
a total of 1,283 residential units which is a reduction of 165 units from the
original 1 448 units approved for the residential portion of the project.
10. The water treatment area at the northwest comer of Village Green South (VGS),
presently Countryside South (CS) was eliminated and two lots were added. Water
for VGS (CS) is famished by Indian River County Utilities Department
11. The sewage treatment plant to be located at the southwest corner of VGS (CS)
was eliminated and replaced with lots and a storage area. Sewage from VGN
(CS) is pumped to the Indian River County Sewage Treatment Plant
12. No building permit shall be issued for development within the overall DRI project
after December 31, 2005 unless the project build -out date is extended and a traffic
study for the project is conducted by the developer and is approved by Indian
River County, Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of
Community Affairs, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. The
study shall identify the improvements and timing of those improvements
necessary to maintain adopted levels of service on the impacted transportation
network, and shall propose an improvements program that is acceptable to Indian
River County, Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Department of
Community Affairs, and the Treasures Coast Regional Planning Council.
13. The legal description of the overall DRI project is contained in Exhibit 'A',
attached. The legal description of the Sabale Blue Water Subdivision project
portion of the overall DRI project is contained in Exhibit 'B', attached.
14. Local government conditions related to the Sabal Trace Blue Water Subdivision
portion of the overall DRI project are as follows:
A. In conjunction with the development of Sabal Trace Blue Water
Ssubdivision project the developer shall provide along the northern and
Coding: Words in stfikethfough are deletions from the previous D.O. resolution, Words underlined are 3
additions.
APRIL 2, 2002
-82-
nu
ov
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 018
western boundary of the Sab Ta -Blue Water Subdivision projectS
the northern boundar of Lots 73-83 of the Blue Water Subdivision
roject the buffer that is required by the county land development
regulations (LDRs) to be provided between mobile home development and
lower density residential development.
B. Phase 2 of the Sabal T
Blue Water Subdivision project shall be designed
and constructed to provide a paved roadway connection to 12`h Street or to
adjacent property that is directly connected to 12`h Street via a paved
roadway.
E.B. Phase 2 of the c^blee-Blue Water Subdivision project shall include
the design and construction of a left turn lane and a right turn deceleration
lane at the 82nd Avenue entrance. Said turn lanes shall meet or exceed
county standards. As an alternative to providing the turn lanes, the
applicant may provide to the county at the time Sabal- eBlu�er
Subdivision phase 2 preliminary plat review an updated traffic analysis
that addresses the need for the turn lanes. If the updated analysis is
acceptable to the county traffic engineer, and if the analysis demonstrates
that no turn lanes are needed under county traffic LDRs then no turn lane
shall be required.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in a public hearing held of
2002. on this 2nd da Y A 1
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Adams who moved its
adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner ri nn
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: and upon
Chairman Ruth M Stanbridge
Vice Chairman Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Ave
Ave
2nd
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
day of Aori 1 , 2002.
Coding: Words in are deletions from the previous D.O. resolution. Words underlined are
additions.
APRIL 2, 2002
-83-
SIL
4
4)
•
ATTEST: J5
Jef
a
KB
State of Florida
County of Indian River
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 018
Ia 4
arton, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
i
Chairman Ruth M. Stanb 'age
Board of County Commissioners
BCC Approved: April 2, 2002
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly
authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgements, personally appeared
Ruth M. Stanbrid e , as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and
PATRICIA "PJ^ .f _ ` _5 as DEPUTY CLERK TO JEFFREY K. BARTON
respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State as aforesaid this
2nd day of Apri 1 , A.D., 2002.
WYh G
Notary Public
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
1
William G. Collins, II
Deputy County Attorney
APP
OVED
S TO PLANNING MATTERS
' obert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
i
Kimberly E. Mauung
MY COMMISSION 1 CC855436 EXPIRES
July 15, 2003
BONDED THRWROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC
•
Coding: Words in stfileethrengh are deletions from the previous D.O. resolution. Words underlined are 5
additions.
APRIL 2, 2002
I 7 r`,
L.
i I.
-84-
APRIL 2, 2002
DWtBIT A
North 30 Acres of Park I including 10 Acres of Cal
Tract 1l, Less and Except the East 30 feet thereof of Section
2, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, according to the last
general plat of lands of Indian River Farms Company filed in
the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie
County, Florida in Plat Book 2, Page 25, said land now lying
and being in Indian River County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT
land described in Official Record Ronk 575, Page 1402, Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH right-
of-way An common with other owners of land in Tract 10 and fl,
in Section 2 above described, their heirs and assigns, at all
times and for all purposes with or without vehicles or animals,
to and from the property herein above conveyed, or any part
thereof over and along a strip of land 60 feet wide; being the
West 30 feet of said Tract 10 and East 30 feet of Tract 11 of
Section 2, Township 33, Range 3U as above described.
South 120 Acres of Park I
All of Tracts 14, 15 and 16, Section 2, Township 33 South,
Range 38 East, according to the last general plat of lands of
Indian River Farms Company filed in the office of the Clerk of
the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florid4., in Plat Book
2, Page 25; said land now lying and being in Indian River
County, Florida.
7 1/2 Acre Perc Pond Site for Park
The North 660 feet of the East 310 feet of Tract 13, Section
2, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, of Indian River Farms
Company, according to Plat filed in the Office of the Clerk of
the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, in Plat Book
2, Page 25, said land now lying and being is Indian River
County, Florida.
And also,
Beginning at the Northwest corner of the North 660 feet of the
East 330 feet of Tract 13, Section 2, Township 33 South, Range
39 East, run West a distance of 330 feet along the North
boundary line of said Tract 13; thence run South a distance of
330 feet to a point; thence run east a distance of 330 feet to
a point; thence run Horth a distant.. of 330 feet to the Point
of Beginning. Said land lying and being in Indian River
County, Florida.
Park II 160 Acres
Tracts 1 and 2, less the north 30 feet thereof,
Tracts 7 and 8, less the south 60 feet thereof,
Section 11, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, Plat of INDIAN
RIVER FARMS COMPANY, filed in the office of Circuit Court, St.
Lucie County, Florida, Plat Book 2, page 25; consisting of 160
acres, more or less.
-85-
•
EXHIBIT B
LEGAI. DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF TRACTS L 2. 7 AND 8. IN SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 3: SOUTT-I. RANGE 38 EAST OE
THE PLAT OF INDIAN RIVER FARMS SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK2. 2-
RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOPAGE ?, AlHE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 7 AND RUN N(N) 1„i_„ FOLLOWS: COMMENCE i' THE
W ALONG THE WST LINE OF
TRACT 7 FOR 60.00 FEET TO THE NORTH RION. OF WAY LINE OF ROS DALE R O DEI th. STREET). T(L)
THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE C'ONTTNI II{ NO(1°12'55'
W ALONG 7 FOR 1261.94 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2THENCE L N EST' LINE OF SAID T 4"W1'
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT' 2. FUR ;31.94 FEET': THENCE RUNN89R3'U1N OR NOF L`67 I
FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEE I. CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING
A RADIUS OF 485.00 FEET: THENCE RUN SO(ITIII:(LY ALONG THE ARC' OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE (W 21 31'06” FOR AN MW LENGTH OF 182.15 HIT (CHORD BEARING OF
S16 22'I3"E FOR 181.08 FEET). THENCE RUN 62 51.57"E FOR 387.74 FEET: TIIFNC'I_ RUN N89 33403"E
FOR 662.92 FEET: THENCE RUN SOO 11113"1:: FOR 200.00 FEET: T -I IENC'I: RI IN N8 )
FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY` +''Ui"E FOR 609.9(,
LINE OF RANCH ROAD, SAID RIGHT OF' WAY LINE BEING 30.00
FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT I AND 8: THENCE RUN
SOO 12'1;"E, ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RANCH ROAD, FOR 573.51 FEET:
THENCE RUN S89 23'59"W FOR 1303 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 8: THENCE RUN
NO0 1221"W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 8. FOR 267.19
FOR 876.64 FEET; THENCE RUN S00 I2'„•• hI:E I:,fIII:NC'F.. RUN S8v 23159"Wh L FOR 1080.61 FEET TO THE NORTI I RIGHT OF WAY LINE 01.
SAID ROSEDALE ROAD. SAID RIGHT (W WAY LINE BEING 60.00 FEE NORTH OF AND PARALLEL -10
TT IF: SO(1TH LINE OF SAID TRACT 7. THENCE RUN S89 23•59"W ALONG SAH) NORTH RIGHT OF WAY
LINE FOR 456.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: SAID LAND LYING AND BITING IN INDIAN RIVER
Cot !NIX. FLORIDA.
SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 46.55 ACRES. MORI:OR LESS,
APRIL 2, 2002
-86-
0
Exhibit 12-2
- '— ; _ _
S•,
"'�Y
r w.
.�� V 1
1wt.tiir.l'"'t .
e.6.7
• .� al tom... "`:_...� ,�.. al --- L -
mMr
mft
APRIL 2, 2002
It. • 1
!i • • t • a
.t
•i ..•.r• •fd ..I.r W...
:• '.82.41. , l i :a r•y
.r•a.•••lil•i �•r 14r L.r
i•.
.111
L
r1: a•• ••y. • 82:1.rob 6.a6.4•41Lil r� ✓
:••:: ' • .•r
.• k: •• ;••1 i Iti; i
T•rr •
•�/� 1.1
1.4
APRIL 2, 2002
s
9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - VERO LAKE ESTATES
STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I - FRANK DE LOS
HOYOS, 8565 97TH COURT - RE: CULVERTING THE 86TH
STREET CANAL AT 97TH COURT, VERO LAKE ESTATES
SUBDIVISION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 2002:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
James Chandler, County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director
W. Keith McCully, P.E., Esq., Stormwater Engineer 0( l
VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER LNIPROVEMENTS, PHASE I
PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM RE: FRANK de los HOYOS
REGARDNG CULVERTII\G THE 86TH STREET CA_NAL AT 97TH
COURT, VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION
DATE: March 25, 2002
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES:
The estimated cost for providing a canal crossing at the intersection of 97th Court and the 86th Street
Canal is:
1. 80 L F. of 48 -inch R.C.P. at 575/ L.F. _ 36,000.00
2. (2) 48 -inch R.C.P. flared end sections at 51,450/each = $2,900.00
TOTAL = $8,900.00
Note: L.F. = lineal feet
The prices above were taken from the project's Contractor's approved contract.
APRIL 2, 2002
-89-
�2
Mark Grossman, 9960 86th Street, President of Vero Lake Estates Property Owners
Association, stated that the Property Owners Association is very pleased with the response
they have received since their last appearance before the Board. There are several
homeowners who now have a longer route to get home because of the dead-end streets
created by the new canals. One of the homeowners, Mrs De Los Hoyos, has been affected
in this way. She has a medical condition and some of her relatives who live close by have
been assisting her. If this culvert on 97th could be installed without an additional cost to the
residents, it would solve the problem the relatives are having in reaching Mrs De Los
Hoyos.
Commissioner Adams explained that Mr. and Mrs. De Los Hoyos came to see her and
explained the problem. In this particular instance, we have separated a family and created
a hardship for the family members going back and forth to care for Mrs. De Los Hoyos.
They had even attempted to raise the monies from their neighbors but have been
unsuccessful. The request is for one culvert at this particular intersection to restore these
residents to their previous ease of access to one another.
Upon questioning regarding labor costs, Public Works Director Jim Davis stated that
the $8900 includes the labor. The State of Florida is making the monies available under a
319 Grant Program.
APRIL 2, 2002
-90-
418
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the culvert work to provide
a canal crossing at the intersection of 97th Court and
the 86th Street Canal in the amount of $8,900, as set
forth in the Memorandum.
11.A. RESOLUTION 2002-018 AMENDING THE
DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DO) APPROVED BY THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI)
PROJECT FORMERLY KNOWN AS VILLAGE GREEN
WEST & VILLAGE GREEN SOUTH, SUBSEQUENTLY
KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE NORTH & COUNTRYSIDE
SOUTH AND NOW KNOWN AS COUNTRYSIDE MOBILE
HOME PARK, VERO PALM ESTATES MOBILE HOME
PARK, AND BLUE WATER SUBDIVISION - BLUE
WATER REALTY, LLC (Quasi -Judicial)
Moved to Item 9.A.2.
APRIL 2, 2002
-91-
[At
r�
y{
rems}
•
11.C.1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CITRUS BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES (BMP) PRIORITY LIST AND
REIMBURSEMENT CONTRACT - INDIAN RIVER SOIL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (IRSWCD) -
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE
(NRCS) - ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT (SJRWMD)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 2002:
Date: March 25, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director
Subject: Indian River County Citrus Best Management Practices Priority List and
Reimbursement Contract
ATTACHMENTS:
• Applicant Score Summary/FY 2002.
• Model Grant Contract between the Grove Owner and the Board of County Commissioners
With attached Exhibits A,B and C.
BACKGROUND:
On October 19 2001, a Cost Share Agreement Between the St. Johns River Water Management
District and Indian River County for Indian River County Citrus Best Management Practices was
signed, Contract # SE660AA, (Attached). This is a fourteen (14) month contract for $50,000 to
cost share a maximum of 75% for each Citrus Best Management Practices (BMP's) for three (3)
specific priorities.
The $50,000 will assist in improving water quality in the Indian River Lagoon by the use of a
cost -share mechanism through the Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District and USDA
(United States Department of Agriculture) Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) to
allow citrus growers to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs). These conservation
practices are designed to achieve the greatest agronomic efficiency in food and fiber production,
while limiting the offsite effects of agricultural operations and simultaneously maintaining an
economically viable farming operation for the grower.
APRIL 2, 2002
Li A
-92-
Mai
The procedure is as follows:
• The grove owner (Cooperator) submits an application to the Indian River Soil and Water
Conservation District (IRSWCD).
• The cooperator meets with the water quality extension agent (Liberty Scotto) and reviews the
BMP's and their importance to the Indian River Lagoon.
• After IRSWCD staff reviews the application, the application is scored based on defined
criteria along with preliminary plans and cost estimates
• The St. Johns River Water Management District personnel are consulted to insure that the
submitted proposals confoini to their funding guidelines.
• The IRSWCD staff prepares a recommended list of eligible projects to be submitted to the
Board of County Commissioners for approval by the Board, and for cost share funding upon
completion of proposed BMP's.
• After acceptance of the recommended list by the Board of County Commissioners,
LRS WCD/NRCS staff prepare a Conservation Plan and fully developed engineering design,
before installation of BMP's may proceed.
• The cooperator shall enter into a grant contract with Indian River County. Installation of the
BMP may proceed.
• Upon completion of the installation of the BMP, the IRSWCD/NRCS staff determines and
certifies if it complies with the plans and specifications as approved.
• Once certified as complete, the cooperator prepares invoices of the expenditures and submits
them to Indian River County through the IRSWCD.
• The cooperator receives reimbursement from the County upon authorization by the
IRSWCD.
• The County submits for reimbursement of the funds from the St. Johns River Water
Management District on a quarterly basis.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the prioritized list of projects submitted by the IRSWCD entitled
Applicant ScoreSummary, attached. Additionally, authorize the Board Chaiinian to execute each
individual Grant Contract between the rove owner and the Board upon verification by the
TRSWCDNRCS staff that a Conservation Plan and fully developed engineering plan has been
prepared. Finally, authorize the reimbursement payment to the rove owner subject to the
reimbursement not exceeding that amount identified in the recommended list approved by the
Board along with certification from IRSWCD RCS staff that the BMP s have been installed as
per approved plans and specifications
APRIL 2, 2002
-93-
Sa
i
•
•
69 E)
CT N
0 A
O Q7
j
01
O
O O
0 E9
Q1
CO
V 0 O
01 CO
APRIL 2, 2002
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved the prioritized list ofprojects
submitted by the IRSWCD entitled Applicant Score
Summary; authorized the Chairman to execute each
individual Grant Contract between the grove owner
and the Board upon verification by the
IRSWCD/NRCS staff that a Conservation Plan and
fully developed engineering plan has been prepared;
and authorized the reimbursement payment to the
grove owner subject to the reimbursement not
exceeding that amount identified in the
recommended list approved by the Board along with
certification from IRS WCD/N RCS staff that the
BMPs have been installed as per approved plans and
specifications; all as recommended by staff.
CONTRACTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
-95-
r grr)
cI1 i.,
it.
8
•
11.C.2. CITRUS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP)
COSTSHARE AGREEMENT - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
(FDACS) - INDIAN RIVER SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT (IRSWCD) - UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA)
NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE
(NRCS)
The Board reviewed Memoranda of March 25, 2002 and April 1, 2002:
Date:
To:
Thru:
From.
Subject:
March 25, 2002
The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director re)
4 -
Citrus Best Management Practices Costshare Agreement between
Indian River County and Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services
EXHIBIT:
• Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Administration
Contractual Services Agreement FDACS Contract #006300.
BACKGROUND:
Effects of stonuwater runoff carrying pollutants from all land uses into our river, lakes and
estuaries have become a national problem. The citrus community came forward in 1998 and
began working on what is now know as the Water Quality/Quantity BMPs for Indian River Area
Citrus Groves. The growers have adopted this manual, and best management practices are being
implemented when economically feasible.
In an effort to increase the number of acreage under BMP implementation, Liberia Scotto, Water
Quality Agent, Indian River County Cooperative Extension Service, requested funding from the
Honda Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). The FDACS is making
$750,000 available over a 3 -year period at $125,000 per year to be used in Indian River County
APRIL 2, 2002
•
-96-
L
•
to allow citnis growers to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs). An advance of 25%
($62 500) of the first year funds will be dispersed to the County at the execution of this contract.
The balance will be paid upon submission of invoices and other supporting documentation after
the implementation and certification of the BM -Ps.
These conservation practices are designed to achieve the greatest agronomic efficiency in food
and fiber production, while limiting the offsite effects of agricultural operations and
simultaneously maintaining an economically viable farming operation for the grower. The
$750 000 will assist in improving water quality in the St. Johns River and Indian River Lagoon
watersheds by the use of a cost -share mechanism through the Indian River Soil and Water
Conservation District and USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS).
The costshare procedure is as follows:
Indian River Soil and Water Conservation. District (IRSWCD) accepts applications for
costshare.
•
Applicants attend an educational function provided by the Water Quality Extension Agent
(Liberta Scotto) or other University ofFlorida faculty pertaining to Citrus BMPs.
IRSWCD staff reviews applications and conducts assessments of groves to identify best
management practices eligible for costshare.
• Applicants provide preliminary design and cost estimates to the IRSWCD.
• IRSWCD prepares a recommended Est of eligible projects to be submitted to the Board of
County Commissioners for approval by the Board, and for funding upon completion of
proposed BMP's.
Applicant shall enter into a grant contract with Indian River County. Installation of the
BMP, as specified, may proceed.
• Upon completion of the installation of the BMP, the IRSWCD/NRCS staff detetnlines and
certifies if it complies with the plans and specifications as approved.
Once certified as complete, the applicant prepares invoices of the expenditures and submits
them to Indian River County through the IRSWCD.
• The applicant receives reimbursement from the County upon authorization of the IRS WCD.
• The County submits for reimbursement of the funds from the Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the funding for the contract as written.
APRIL 2, 2002
-97-
:n„
ld 0
•
•
Date: April 1, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director tp.
Subject: Agenda Item 11C2. (April 2, 2002) Citrus Best Management Practices
Costshare Agreement between Indian River County and Florida Department of
Agricultural and Consumer Services Correction of Error
Please note on Agenda page 197 under Item 11 C2, within the second
paragraph of the
Background information, fourth line, the amount $125,000 is in err and should have been
$250,000.
This amount would then correctly provide $250,000 over a three-year period and would provide
$62,500 as an amount equivalent to 25 % of the first year funds
Chairman Stanbridge thanked Liberta Scotto of the Agriculture Extension Office for
an excellent job.
APRIL 2, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved acceptance ofthe funding for
the contract as written, as recommended by staff
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IS
ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-98-
ID f 1
3
11.C.3. NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY - CONTRACTUAL
CUSTODIAL SERVICES - RAY CHOQUET
RETIREMENT - CONTRACT WITH CLEANNET USA
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 2002:
Date: March 25, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director tci. (�
Subject: Contractual Custodial Services at North County Library tl
BACKGROUND:
Attached, please find a memorandum from Mr. Lynn Williams, Superintendent of Building and
Grounds. Mr. Williams brings out a couple of pertinent facts. First, Mr. Ray Choquet who is the
current on-site custodian is retiring effective April 25, 2002. Secondly, the library will increase
its area by approximately 50 % to over 25,000 square feet.
The size of the library with its expansion and the six days a week operation make it inefficient to
continue in-house custodial services. With the retirement of Mr Ray Choquet, now is the ideal
time to consider placing this facility under our contract custodial provider Cleanlv,et USA. The
position presently held, would not be replaced providing a shift to a potentially lower cost.
At the request of the County CleamNet has provided a quote to undertake this custodial
responsibility to the end of this fiscal year. CleanNet has quoted a price of $2,268 per month
Annualized that is equivalent of $27,216. As Mr. Williams has shown, comparable staff costs
with an additional part-time helper of twenty hours a week is $42,854 utilizing the current
position. Even if both the full time and part-time positions were basic entry level, the cost would
still exceed $31,000 annually.
RECOiMMENDATION:
Considenng the excellent service that is obtained from CleamNet and the reduced cost in
operations, staff would recommend that custodial position presently held by Mr. Ray Choquet be
dropped upon his retirement; that the CleanlNet USA cost proposal be accepted until the end of
this fiscal year at a monthly rate of $2,268.
APRIL 2, 2002
-99-
El
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved dropping the custodial
position presently held by Mr. Ray Choquet upon
his retirement effective April 25, 2002 and accepted
the CleanNet USA cost proposal until the end of this
fiscal year at a monthly rate of $2,268, as
recommended by staff.
COST PROPOSAL WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.I. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE -
REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION TO THE 120 DAY DUE DATE
FOR AUDIT - H.O.P.E. (HELPING OTHER PEOPLE EXCEL)
PROJECT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 13, 2002:
APRIL 2, 2002
-100-
[ r i
To: Indian River County Commissioners
From. Joyce Johnston -Carlson, Director, Human Servic%
Subject: Request for exception to the 120 day due date or audit for the H.0 P E, Project
Date: March 13, 2002
The H.O.P E Project is a funded program under the Children's Services funding process.
Rev. Burson is asking for an extension until June 30, 2002 of your rule that audits are due
to the county 120 after the end of the first year of operation. I have attached a copy of the
letter they sent and the reasoning behind the request and letters from two schools who
have had students attend the H.O.P.E. Project.
The budget office and I would recommend that any funding of grants to the H.O P E
program for the 2002-2003 year would be contingent upon a submission of a clean audit.
I have monitored this program 5 times for the past 15 months. The program is making a
difference in the behavior of the children H O.P.E. has worked with in the past year. We
should have some clear statistics from school board records to show improvement in
behavior within the next 2 to 3 months. There have been several problems with H.O P E
getting their audit and I believe these have been solved.
I would recommend your approval of this item.
Human Services Director Joyce Johnston -Carlson explained that this is one of the
agencies under the Children's Services grants. They are asking for an extension on the date
for filing their audit. This is an unusual situation and Reverend Burson and his wife are
here to answer any questions you might have. She understood that Assistant County
Administrator Joe Baird has provided the Board with copies of communications setting forth
several problems they have had in applying for reimbursements. It was her understanding
that those problems have now been solved. This group has stepped forward and done an
APRIL 2, 2002
-101-
o7) ,., 11
•
excellent job for the children and they have been extremely cooperative in complying with
any requests made of them. At a meeting several weeks ago their bookkeeper,
Commissioner Macht and Budget Manager Jason Brown were present and the records were
in order at that time. The group has submitted several letters to indicate the positive effects
their program has been having. Research has shown that the program has about 70%
positive results upon the young people who have been through the program and the
behavioral problems have not recurred.
Commissioner Ginn questioned the number of children served by the program, and
Ms. Johnston -Carlson stated there were 115 the first year, and they have had 160 since the
beginning of school this year.
Commissioner Ginn then questioned the insurance for the program which is written
through the Progressive Civic League.
Assistant County Administrator Joe Baird stated that the insurance certificate should
be for Northside Agape Ministries. Also, the Board has a firm policy about receipt of the
audits within the allotted time.
Commissioner Adams questioned who the checks are written to, and Budget Manager
Jason Brown stated that Northside Agape Ministries receives the. reimbursements.
Mr Baird noted that the program's application and contract were all issued in the
name of Northside Agape Ministries. Project HOPE does not exist as a legal entity.
Commissioner Ginn sympathized with the project's problems but emphasized that the
policies are in place to protect the public's money.
Reverend Henry Burson expressed his appreciation for the forum and his regret for
the misunderstanding on their part as to the correct legal name for the program. This is a
very young program and there are only 2 or 3 like it throughout the state. The School Board
APRIL 2, 2002
-102-
does not have a program to deal with these youngsters and most of them would be
unsupervised were it not for this program. There is a tremendous need for the program
throughout the state and St Lucie County's program is so successful that their county is
funding their program. The program has received accolades from parents, the public and
the School Districts. Over 60% of the kids served by this program are Caucasian and many
are from Fellsmere and Roseland, as well as Vero Beach. These children get credit for the
work done through the program and they do not fall behind the other students. There is an
exception to every rule and he continued with an explanation of the events leading to their
need for extra time to supply their audit. Northside Agape Ministries did not have the funds
to pay for an audit and at no time was any money for Project HOPE co -mingled with monies
belonging to Northside Agape Ministries. Their accounts are at different banks and an audit
of Northside will not show any HOPE funds except for payroll taxes reimbursed to
Northside by Project HOPE They are just learning all the financial rules but they are
committed to their work and hope to be able to comply with the rules in the future.
Dave Pearson, 235 Coconut Palm Road, bookkeeper, stated that he has been offering
his services to Project HOPE and will assist them in getting their audit completed.
Commissioner Adams commented that the Board has to balance the positive effects
of the program with their responsibilities to the public. She suggested that Children's
Services could withhold a portion of the program's funding until the audit is submitted and
found to be in order.
After discussion regarding the confusion in the legal name of the program,
Commissioner Macht noted that the project has now applied for 501(c)(3) status in its own
name which should solve the problem.
APRIL 2, 2002
-103-
7A
1a
vb
•
Mr. Baird reiterated that the audit will have to be on Northside Agape Ministries as
that is the entity which has a contract with the County.
County Administrator Jim Chandler then explained that the audit due is for the first
year of funding in the amount of $25,000. The program is now into the second year of
funding in the amount of $75,000. He also confiiuned that the audit must be supplied on
Northside Agape Ministries.
Commissioner Ginn noted that she had questioned many of these procedures when
Children's Services began and emphasized that she felt the regulations are far too lenient.
She suggested using $5,000 of the funds allocated to the program to hire someone to
straighten out the problems.
Mr Pearson appreciated hearing the Commissioners' points of view and stated that
it is his intention to assist the program with the various issues involved. He knows that the
accountants are more than willing to prepare the audit required. They are simply asking for
an extension until after April 15' as this is their busiest time of year. They have assured
everyone that each dollar can be accounted for and the only problems are technical. He
talked to Chip Jacoby and Rebecca Colton and they have assured him they will start the
process within days after the tax season is over.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn to
allocate $5,000 from the program's funds to
straighten out the problems. THE MOTION DIED
FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Discussion ensued regarding the due date for the audit and the various solutions
previously discussed.
APRIL 2, 2002
-104-
Commissioner Macht stated that this is an excellent program and agreed that it is
ridiculous for the School District to suspend these kids and not fund a program for them, but
the alternative is to turn the children loose on society. He asked the Board to find a way to
preserve this program which was very carefully considered by a number of very responsible
citizens on the Children's Services Advisory Committee.
Commissioner Tippin said "amen" to Commissioner Macht's comments and agreed
there is a need to make an exception for these kids. He suggested an extension of 30 days.
Rene Renzi, 340 East Waverly Place, expressed her frustration with the "nitpicking"
over this $25,000 and stated that, if the program is doing a good job, the Board should do
something positive for it.
Reverend Burson emphasized that there has been no co -mingling of the funds; there
is no hidden agenda; they have been totally honest with the funds; and he did not want the
public to get the impression over the air waves that there had been any wrongdoing.
Commissioner Macht stated that the program is also being funded by the Richardson
Foundation and the Johns Island Foundation. He asked Administrator Chandler for a
suggestion to solve this problem and stated that this is a start-up organization by a "man of
the cloth" who does not possess the necessary accounting skills.
APRIL 2, 2002
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, to grant an
extension of time to Project HOPE to file their audit.
-105-
•
MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner
Macht, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin to
allow Project HOPE until June 1St, 2002, to file the
required audit.
Administrator Chandler noted that there will be 2 audits due; one for the first $25,000
funded and one for the second $75,000 funded.
Commissioner Macht also noted that, as of now, this project is no longer a start-up
project and they must now comply with all the regulations. He expressed his appreciation
for people who have the perception to step into an area of need and act to solve a problem
which has been dumped on society.
Reverend Burson clarified that the audit must be through Northside Agape Ministries.
Commissioner Ginn advised Reverend Burson that when County money is accepted
you then become subject to the Sunshine Law and the Florida Public Records Law.
County Attorney Paul Bangel clarified that a paragraph in the present agreement
states that the entity must comply "if applicable".
Chairman Stanbridge commented that these agencies should examine these contracts
closely with an eye to avoiding any future such problems.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed unanimously (approved an
extension until June 1, 2002 for the required audit
from The H.O.P E Project).
APRIL 2, 2002
-106-
U : 6
9
•
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES
None.
13.E. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT - DODGERS
Deferred to April 9, 2002.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
Chairman Stanbridge reminded the public of the partnership ceremony at 2:00 p.m.
tomorrow regarding the Pelican Island buffer.
APRIL 2, 2002
Dit
-107-
e e
F
U
•
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 10:28 a.m.
ATTEST:
Minutes Approved:
APRIL 2, 2002