HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/3/2001BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2001 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 2 Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman District 5
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Vice Chairman District 2
Fran B. Adams
Kenneth R. Macht
John W. Tippin
District 1
District 3
District 4
9:00 a.m. i. CALL TO ORDER
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
2. INVOCATION Rev. Bill Nigh, Community Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONSIDELETIONS to the AGENDAIEMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITIONS: 13.13.2. Authorization to travel re Lost Tree Islands
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 2001 as Florida
Confederate History Month in Indian River County
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular meeting of Feb. 13, 2001
B. Regular meeting of Feb. 20, 2001
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1) I.R. C. District School Board Report No. 01-115,
Financial, Operational, and Federal Single Audit
Report for FY Ended 06/30/00
BACKUP
PAGES
680
1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2001 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 2 Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman District 5
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Vice Chairman District 2
Fran B. Adams
Kenneth R. Macht
John W. Tippin
District 1
District 3
District 4
9:00 a.m. i. CALL TO ORDER
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
2. INVOCATION Rev. Bill Nigh, Community Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONSIDELETIONS to the AGENDAIEMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITIONS: 13.13.2. Authorization to travel re Lost Tree Islands
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 2001 as Florida
Confederate History Month in Indian River County
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular meeting of Feb. 13, 2001
B. Regular meeting of Feb. 20, 2001
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1) I.R. C. District School Board Report No. 01-115,
Financial, Operational, and Federal Single Audit
Report for FY Ended 06/30/00
BACKUP
PAGES
680
1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2001 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 2 Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman District 5
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Vice Chairman District 2
Fran B. Adams
Kenneth R. Macht
John W. Tippin
District 1
District 3
District 4
9:00 a.m. i. CALL TO ORDER
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
2. INVOCATION Rev. Bill Nigh, Community Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. John W. Tippin
4. ADDITIONSIDELETIONS to the AGENDAIEMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITIONS: 13.13.2. Authorization to travel re Lost Tree Islands
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation Designating April 2001 as Florida
Confederate History Month in Indian River County
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular meeting of Feb. 13, 2001
B. Regular meeting of Feb. 20, 2001
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1) I.R. C. District School Board Report No. 01-115,
Financial, Operational, and Federal Single Audit
Report for FY Ended 06/30/00
BACKUP
PAGES
680
1
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd Z BACKUP
A. (cont'd.): PAGES
2) St. Johns River Water Management District
Annual Financial Audit for 1999-2000 for_
FYEnded 09/30/00
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated March 15, 2001) 2-11
C. Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers for Attaining
the Rank of Eagle Scout 12
D. Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD)
(memorandum dated March 27, 2001) 13-15
E. Annual Financial Report
(memorandum dated March 26, 200 1) 16-25
F. Donation of Surplus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial
Hospital, Inc.
(memorandum dated March 21, 200 1) 26-29
G. Purchase & Maintenance Agreements for Utility Engineer-
ing Black -Line Copier
(memorandum dated March 15, 2001) 30-33
H. Recently Acquired Property — Tax Cancellation
(memorandum dated March 15, 200 1) 34-58
I. Renewal Application for Workers' Compensation
Managed Care Network
(memorandum dated March 21, 200 1) 59-62
J. Approval of Change Order to Contract to Revise Com-
pletion Date: Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc. Construction
of a Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing at the
Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area
(memorandum dated March 27, 200 1) 63-67
K. Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments,
Ltd. Request for Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf
Club PD
(memorandum dated March 6, 2001) 68-75
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd Z BACKUP
A. (cont'd.): PAGES
2) St. Johns River Water Management District
Annual Financial Audit for 1999-2000 for_
FYEnded 09/30/00
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated March 15, 2001) 2-11
C. Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers for Attaining
the Rank of Eagle Scout 12
D. Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD)
(memorandum dated March 27, 2001) 13-15
E. Annual Financial Report
(memorandum dated March 26, 200 1) 16-25
F. Donation of Surplus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial
Hospital, Inc.
(memorandum dated March 21, 200 1) 26-29
G. Purchase & Maintenance Agreements for Utility Engineer-
ing Black -Line Copier
(memorandum dated March 15, 2001) 30-33
H. Recently Acquired Property — Tax Cancellation
(memorandum dated March 15, 200 1) 34-58
I. Renewal Application for Workers' Compensation
Managed Care Network
(memorandum dated March 21, 200 1) 59-62
J. Approval of Change Order to Contract to Revise Com-
pletion Date: Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc. Construction
of a Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing at the
Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area
(memorandum dated March 27, 200 1) 63-67
K. Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments,
Ltd. Request for Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf
Club PD
(memorandum dated March 6, 2001) 68-75
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd Z BACKUP
A. (cont'd.): PAGES
2) St. Johns River Water Management District
Annual Financial Audit for 1999-2000 for_
FYEnded 09/30/00
B. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated March 15, 2001) 2-11
C. Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers for Attaining
the Rank of Eagle Scout 12
D. Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD)
(memorandum dated March 27, 2001) 13-15
E. Annual Financial Report
(memorandum dated March 26, 200 1) 16-25
F. Donation of Surplus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial
Hospital, Inc.
(memorandum dated March 21, 200 1) 26-29
G. Purchase & Maintenance Agreements for Utility Engineer-
ing Black -Line Copier
(memorandum dated March 15, 2001) 30-33
H. Recently Acquired Property — Tax Cancellation
(memorandum dated March 15, 200 1) 34-58
I. Renewal Application for Workers' Compensation
Managed Care Network
(memorandum dated March 21, 200 1) 59-62
J. Approval of Change Order to Contract to Revise Com-
pletion Date: Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc. Construction
of a Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing at the
Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area
(memorandum dated March 27, 200 1) 63-67
K. Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments,
Ltd. Request for Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf
Club PD
(memorandum dated March 6, 2001) 68-75
7. CONSENT AGENDA kont'd.): BACKUP
L. Approval of Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of PAGES
Total Project Costs Statement: Cost -Share Purchase
of the Andre Parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh
Environmental Land Acquisition Project
(memorandum dated March 28, 2001) 76-81
M. Award Bid #3036 Purchase of Eight (8) Sodium Hypo-
chlorite Storage Tanks — Utilities Dept. / Water Pro-
duction and Wastewater Treatment Dept.
(memorandum dated March 16, 2001) 82-92
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Reschedule Brisben Companies (Palms of Vero Beach)
TEFRA Hearing to April 10, 2001
(memorandum dated March 21, 2001) 93-94
Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from Tim Timinsky to speak regarding
lack of utilities to vegetable stand in Sebastian
(letter dated March 28, 2001) 95
2. Request from Sidney W. Turner to discuss
election reform
(letter dated March 27, 2001) 96
3. Request from Francis M. Coffey to discuss
status of capital projects
(letter dated March 28, 2001) 97
4. Appeals by Steve and Linda Brown and the
North Beach Civic Association of Planning
and Zoning Commission's Decision to Approve
Major Site Plan for a Seven (7) Unit Building
for Atlas Development Company (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 28, 2001) 98-144
Co - PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
ell 1 i f PG 682
7. CONSENT AGENDA kont'd.): BACKUP
L. Approval of Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of PAGES
Total Project Costs Statement: Cost -Share Purchase
of the Andre Parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh
Environmental Land Acquisition Project
(memorandum dated March 28, 2001) 76-81
M. Award Bid #3036 Purchase of Eight (8) Sodium Hypo-
chlorite Storage Tanks — Utilities Dept. / Water Pro-
duction and Wastewater Treatment Dept.
(memorandum dated March 16, 2001) 82-92
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Reschedule Brisben Companies (Palms of Vero Beach)
TEFRA Hearing to April 10, 2001
(memorandum dated March 21, 2001) 93-94
Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from Tim Timinsky to speak regarding
lack of utilities to vegetable stand in Sebastian
(letter dated March 28, 2001) 95
2. Request from Sidney W. Turner to discuss
election reform
(letter dated March 27, 2001) 96
3. Request from Francis M. Coffey to discuss
status of capital projects
(letter dated March 28, 2001) 97
4. Appeals by Steve and Linda Brown and the
North Beach Civic Association of Planning
and Zoning Commission's Decision to Approve
Major Site Plan for a Seven (7) Unit Building
for Atlas Development Company (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 28, 2001) 98-144
Co - PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
ell 1 i f PG 682
7. CONSENT AGENDA kont'd.): BACKUP
L. Approval of Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of PAGES
Total Project Costs Statement: Cost -Share Purchase
of the Andre Parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh
Environmental Land Acquisition Project
(memorandum dated March 28, 2001) 76-81
M. Award Bid #3036 Purchase of Eight (8) Sodium Hypo-
chlorite Storage Tanks — Utilities Dept. / Water Pro-
duction and Wastewater Treatment Dept.
(memorandum dated March 16, 2001) 82-92
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Reschedule Brisben Companies (Palms of Vero Beach)
TEFRA Hearing to April 10, 2001
(memorandum dated March 21, 2001) 93-94
Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from Tim Timinsky to speak regarding
lack of utilities to vegetable stand in Sebastian
(letter dated March 28, 2001) 95
2. Request from Sidney W. Turner to discuss
election reform
(letter dated March 27, 2001) 96
3. Request from Francis M. Coffey to discuss
status of capital projects
(letter dated March 28, 2001) 97
4. Appeals by Steve and Linda Brown and the
North Beach Civic Association of Planning
and Zoning Commission's Decision to Approve
Major Site Plan for a Seven (7) Unit Building
for Atlas Development Company (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated March 28, 2001) 98-144
Co - PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
ell 1 i f PG 682
BACKUP
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS PAGES
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
1. Consideration of State Housing Initiatives
Partnership (SHIP) Funds Set Aside for Habitat
for Humanity Clients
(memorandum dated March 22, 200 1) 145-149
2. Request for Board Approval of Second Amend-
ment to Option Agreement for State Cost -Share
Reimbursement: Fischer -Sebastian River Con-
servation Area
(memorandum dated March 27, 2001) 150-157
Be Emergency Services
None
Co General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
2001/2002 Budget Workshop/Hearing Schedule
(memorandum dated March 20, 200 1) 158
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
Vero Lake Estates Stormwater Improvements
(memorandum dated March 23, 2001) 159-162
H. Utilities
1. Water Production Pumping System Upgrade
(memorandum dated March 1, 200 1) 163-171
2, Indian River County South Reverse Osmosis
Water Treatment Plant Membrane Replacement
(memorandum dated March 16, 200 1) 172-173
i11i/ G
BACKUP
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS PAGES
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
1. Consideration of State Housing Initiatives
Partnership (SHIP) Funds Set Aside for Habitat
for Humanity Clients
(memorandum dated March 22, 200 1) 145-149
2. Request for Board Approval of Second Amend-
ment to Option Agreement for State Cost -Share
Reimbursement: Fischer -Sebastian River Con-
servation Area
(memorandum dated March 27, 2001) 150-157
Be Emergency Services
None
Co General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
2001/2002 Budget Workshop/Hearing Schedule
(memorandum dated March 20, 200 1) 158
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
Vero Lake Estates Stormwater Improvements
(memorandum dated March 23, 2001) 159-162
H. Utilities
1. Water Production Pumping System Upgrade
(memorandum dated March 1, 200 1) 163-171
2, Indian River County South Reverse Osmosis
Water Treatment Plant Membrane Replacement
(memorandum dated March 16, 200 1) 172-173
i11i/ G
BACKUP
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS PAGES
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
1. Consideration of State Housing Initiatives
Partnership (SHIP) Funds Set Aside for Habitat
for Humanity Clients
(memorandum dated March 22, 200 1) 145-149
2. Request for Board Approval of Second Amend-
ment to Option Agreement for State Cost -Share
Reimbursement: Fischer -Sebastian River Con-
servation Area
(memorandum dated March 27, 2001) 150-157
Be Emergency Services
None
Co General Services
None
D. Leisure Services
None
E. Office of Management and Budget
2001/2002 Budget Workshop/Hearing Schedule
(memorandum dated March 20, 200 1) 158
F. Personnel
None
G. Public Works
Vero Lake Estates Stormwater Improvements
(memorandum dated March 23, 2001) 159-162
H. Utilities
1. Water Production Pumping System Upgrade
(memorandum dated March 1, 200 1) 163-171
2, Indian River County South Reverse Osmosis
Water Treatment Plant Membrane Replacement
(memorandum dated March 16, 200 1) 172-173
i11i/ G
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): BACKUP
PAGES
H. Utilities (cont'd.):
3. Extension of Water Service Along the West Side
of U.S. Highway One — City of Sebastian
Resolutions I and II — Preliminary Assessment
(memorandum dated March 16, 2001) 174-187
I. Human Services
Children's Services Advisory Committee Plan Update
2001/2002
(letter dated March 21, 2001) 188-202
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Census / Reapportionment
(no backup)
Be Vice Chairman Ruth M. StanbridLye
Resolution Supporting the Indian River Lagoon Scenic
Highway Beautification Grant Proposal to the Florida
Department of Transportation 203-204
C. Commissioner Fran Be Adams
D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E. Commissioner John We Tippin
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): BACKUP
PAGES
H. Utilities (cont'd.):
3. Extension of Water Service Along the West Side
of U.S. Highway One — City of Sebastian
Resolutions I and II — Preliminary Assessment
(memorandum dated March 16, 2001) 174-187
I. Human Services
Children's Services Advisory Committee Plan Update
2001/2002
(letter dated March 21, 2001) 188-202
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Census / Reapportionment
(no backup)
Be Vice Chairman Ruth M. StanbridLye
Resolution Supporting the Indian River Lagoon Scenic
Highway Beautification Grant Proposal to the Florida
Department of Transportation 203-204
C. Commissioner Fran Be Adams
D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E. Commissioner John We Tippin
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.): BACKUP
PAGES
H. Utilities (cont'd.):
3. Extension of Water Service Along the West Side
of U.S. Highway One — City of Sebastian
Resolutions I and II — Preliminary Assessment
(memorandum dated March 16, 2001) 174-187
I. Human Services
Children's Services Advisory Committee Plan Update
2001/2002
(letter dated March 21, 2001) 188-202
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Caroline D. Ginn
Census / Reapportionment
(no backup)
Be Vice Chairman Ruth M. StanbridLye
Resolution Supporting the Indian River Lagoon Scenic
Highway Beautification Grant Proposal to the Florida
Department of Transportation 203-204
C. Commissioner Fran Be Adams
D. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
E. Commissioner John We Tippin
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 3/13/01
2, Award Bid #3046 Purchase of Ten (10) Open Top
Roll -Off Containers
(memorandum dated March 14, 2001)
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
BACKUP
PAGES
205-215
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p. m.
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 3/13/01
2, Award Bid #3046 Purchase of Ten (10) Open Top
Roll -Off Containers
(memorandum dated March 14, 2001)
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
BACKUP
PAGES
205-215
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p. m.
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 3/13/01
2, Award Bid #3046 Purchase of Ten (10) Open Top
Roll -Off Containers
(memorandum dated March 14, 2001)
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
BACKUP
PAGES
205-215
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until
5:00 p. m.
2
3
4
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2001
CALL TO ORDER.. I ..... I ......... 1
INVOCATION....................................................1
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....11.11.. 1. 1 1.. 1 ....................... 1
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ...... 1
5.A. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS - PROCLAMATION - FLORIDA
CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - APRIL
2001 ... ... .....
.................................................2
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 13, 2001 ...................... 3
6.13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 20, 2001 . 1. 1 1. 1 1..1........1.1 3
7. CONSENT AGENDA 3
7.A. Reports.....................................................3
7.13. Approval of Warrants ............................. 1 . 1 1 . 1 ... 4
7.C. Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers for Attaining the Rank of Eagle
ScoutI ...... I......I..I..I.... 1..1.1..1 ................... 12
7.D. Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD) (Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge) ..... I .. I .. I .. I ...... 12
7.E. Indian River County Annual Local Government Financial Report for FY
1999-2000 ...................1..1.1..1..1..1..1.....1..1.., 13
7.F. Donation of Surplus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc.... 14
7.G. Purchase and Maintenance Agreements for Utility Services Department
Engineering for Black -Line Copier from EGP, Inc. .... I ..... I ... 1 . , 16
TH. Resolution Nos. 2001-029 thru 2001-036 - Recently Acquired Properties -
Tax Cancellation - Oak Chase Development (r/w 33rd Street); Bittner (r/w
Willow Street); Housch (r/w Willow Street); Garcia (r/w Fellsmere
Sidewalk); Laurel Bldrs. (r/w 58th Avenue); Hyatt Fruit (r/w 43rd Avenue);
Lake Grace of Vero (r/w 58th Avenue); Bechtold (r/w 5th Street SW) .. 18
G i d PG 686
72
2
3
4
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2001
CALL TO ORDER.. I ..... I ......... 1
INVOCATION....................................................1
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....11.11.. 1. 1 1.. 1 ....................... 1
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ...... 1
5.A. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS - PROCLAMATION - FLORIDA
CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - APRIL
2001 ... ... .....
.................................................2
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 13, 2001 ...................... 3
6.13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 20, 2001 . 1. 1 1. 1 1..1........1.1 3
7. CONSENT AGENDA 3
7.A. Reports.....................................................3
7.13. Approval of Warrants ............................. 1 . 1 1 . 1 ... 4
7.C. Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers for Attaining the Rank of Eagle
ScoutI ...... I......I..I..I.... 1..1.1..1 ................... 12
7.D. Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD) (Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge) ..... I .. I .. I .. I ...... 12
7.E. Indian River County Annual Local Government Financial Report for FY
1999-2000 ...................1..1.1..1..1..1..1.....1..1.., 13
7.F. Donation of Surplus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc.... 14
7.G. Purchase and Maintenance Agreements for Utility Services Department
Engineering for Black -Line Copier from EGP, Inc. .... I ..... I ... 1 . , 16
TH. Resolution Nos. 2001-029 thru 2001-036 - Recently Acquired Properties -
Tax Cancellation - Oak Chase Development (r/w 33rd Street); Bittner (r/w
Willow Street); Housch (r/w Willow Street); Garcia (r/w Fellsmere
Sidewalk); Laurel Bldrs. (r/w 58th Avenue); Hyatt Fruit (r/w 43rd Avenue);
Lake Grace of Vero (r/w 58th Avenue); Bechtold (r/w 5th Street SW) .. 18
G i d PG 686
72
2
3
4
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2001
CALL TO ORDER.. I ..... I ......... 1
INVOCATION....................................................1
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ....11.11.. 1. 1 1.. 1 ....................... 1
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ...... 1
5.A. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS - PROCLAMATION - FLORIDA
CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - APRIL
2001 ... ... .....
.................................................2
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 13, 2001 ...................... 3
6.13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 20, 2001 . 1. 1 1. 1 1..1........1.1 3
7. CONSENT AGENDA 3
7.A. Reports.....................................................3
7.13. Approval of Warrants ............................. 1 . 1 1 . 1 ... 4
7.C. Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers for Attaining the Rank of Eagle
ScoutI ...... I......I..I..I.... 1..1.1..1 ................... 12
7.D. Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD) (Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge) ..... I .. I .. I .. I ...... 12
7.E. Indian River County Annual Local Government Financial Report for FY
1999-2000 ...................1..1.1..1..1..1..1.....1..1.., 13
7.F. Donation of Surplus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc.... 14
7.G. Purchase and Maintenance Agreements for Utility Services Department
Engineering for Black -Line Copier from EGP, Inc. .... I ..... I ... 1 . , 16
TH. Resolution Nos. 2001-029 thru 2001-036 - Recently Acquired Properties -
Tax Cancellation - Oak Chase Development (r/w 33rd Street); Bittner (r/w
Willow Street); Housch (r/w Willow Street); Garcia (r/w Fellsmere
Sidewalk); Laurel Bldrs. (r/w 58th Avenue); Hyatt Fruit (r/w 43rd Avenue);
Lake Grace of Vero (r/w 58th Avenue); Bechtold (r/w 5th Street SW) .. 18
G i d PG 686
72
'TSK•d� _ '. �,1,7,14W 1
7.I. Workers' Compensation Managed Care Network - Renewal Application -
CorVel and JLT Insurance Services 1.I'll44
7.J. Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area - Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc. -
Change Order (Revise Completion Date) to Contract re Construction of
Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing - Florida Greenways and
Trails Program ..I..I.I.I... 1.11.1 ....................... 45
7.K. Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. - Request
for Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf Club PD I ............ I . 1 46
7.L. Cost -Share Purchase of the Sabonjohn, Simmons, and Andre Parcels of the
Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Environmental Land Acquisition Project - Amended
Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs Statement I ......... 48
7.M. Award Bid #3036 - Purchase of 8 Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Tanks -
Utilities Department/Water Production and Wastewater Treatment
Department - Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. .... I ... 1 . , ........ 49
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING -RESCHEDULE BRISBEN COMPANIES (PALMS OF
VERO BEACH) TEFRA HEARING TO APRIL 10, 2001 . 1. 1. 1 ... 1 ..... 1. 51
9.13.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TIM TIMINSKY - (KROEGEL PRODUCE)
LACK OF UTILITIES TO VEGETABLE STAND IN SEBASTIAN .. I ..... 52
9.13.2, PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - SIDNEY W. TURNER - ELECTION REFORM
...............................................................56
9.13.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY - REMARKS ABOUT
REPORTING ON THE STATUS OF CAPITAL PROJECTS .1.1...11.... 57
9.13.4, PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - APPEAL BY STEVE AND LINDA BROWN
AND THE NORTH BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION OF PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE MAJOR SITE PLAN
FOR A SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING FOR ATLAS DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY (BOSTON HOMES, ORCHID DUNES/SIEGEL)(Quasi-Judicial) 60
I LA. 1. CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES
PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) FUNDS SET ASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS ....... I . , .... I ........... 0 ......... 73
I LA.2. FISCHER-SEBASTIAN RIVER CONSERVATION AREA - SECOND
AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT FOR STATE COST -SHARE
REIMBURSEMENT........................................77
2
B, Pbb87
'TSK•d� _ '. �,1,7,14W 1
7.I. Workers' Compensation Managed Care Network - Renewal Application -
CorVel and JLT Insurance Services 1.I'll44
7.J. Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area - Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc. -
Change Order (Revise Completion Date) to Contract re Construction of
Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing - Florida Greenways and
Trails Program ..I..I.I.I... 1.11.1 ....................... 45
7.K. Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. - Request
for Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf Club PD I ............ I . 1 46
7.L. Cost -Share Purchase of the Sabonjohn, Simmons, and Andre Parcels of the
Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Environmental Land Acquisition Project - Amended
Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs Statement I ......... 48
7.M. Award Bid #3036 - Purchase of 8 Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Tanks -
Utilities Department/Water Production and Wastewater Treatment
Department - Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. .... I ... 1 . , ........ 49
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING -RESCHEDULE BRISBEN COMPANIES (PALMS OF
VERO BEACH) TEFRA HEARING TO APRIL 10, 2001 . 1. 1. 1 ... 1 ..... 1. 51
9.13.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TIM TIMINSKY - (KROEGEL PRODUCE)
LACK OF UTILITIES TO VEGETABLE STAND IN SEBASTIAN .. I ..... 52
9.13.2, PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - SIDNEY W. TURNER - ELECTION REFORM
...............................................................56
9.13.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY - REMARKS ABOUT
REPORTING ON THE STATUS OF CAPITAL PROJECTS .1.1...11.... 57
9.13.4, PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - APPEAL BY STEVE AND LINDA BROWN
AND THE NORTH BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION OF PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE MAJOR SITE PLAN
FOR A SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING FOR ATLAS DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY (BOSTON HOMES, ORCHID DUNES/SIEGEL)(Quasi-Judicial) 60
I LA. 1. CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES
PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) FUNDS SET ASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS ....... I . , .... I ........... 0 ......... 73
I LA.2. FISCHER-SEBASTIAN RIVER CONSERVATION AREA - SECOND
AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT FOR STATE COST -SHARE
REIMBURSEMENT........................................77
2
B, Pbb87
'TSK•d� _ '. �,1,7,14W 1
7.I. Workers' Compensation Managed Care Network - Renewal Application -
CorVel and JLT Insurance Services 1.I'll44
7.J. Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area - Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc. -
Change Order (Revise Completion Date) to Contract re Construction of
Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing - Florida Greenways and
Trails Program ..I..I.I.I... 1.11.1 ....................... 45
7.K. Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. - Request
for Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf Club PD I ............ I . 1 46
7.L. Cost -Share Purchase of the Sabonjohn, Simmons, and Andre Parcels of the
Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Environmental Land Acquisition Project - Amended
Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs Statement I ......... 48
7.M. Award Bid #3036 - Purchase of 8 Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Tanks -
Utilities Department/Water Production and Wastewater Treatment
Department - Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. .... I ... 1 . , ........ 49
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING -RESCHEDULE BRISBEN COMPANIES (PALMS OF
VERO BEACH) TEFRA HEARING TO APRIL 10, 2001 . 1. 1. 1 ... 1 ..... 1. 51
9.13.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TIM TIMINSKY - (KROEGEL PRODUCE)
LACK OF UTILITIES TO VEGETABLE STAND IN SEBASTIAN .. I ..... 52
9.13.2, PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - SIDNEY W. TURNER - ELECTION REFORM
...............................................................56
9.13.3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - FRANCIS M. COFFEY - REMARKS ABOUT
REPORTING ON THE STATUS OF CAPITAL PROJECTS .1.1...11.... 57
9.13.4, PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - APPEAL BY STEVE AND LINDA BROWN
AND THE NORTH BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION OF PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE MAJOR SITE PLAN
FOR A SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING FOR ATLAS DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY (BOSTON HOMES, ORCHID DUNES/SIEGEL)(Quasi-Judicial) 60
I LA. 1. CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES
PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) FUNDS SET ASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS ....... I . , .... I ........... 0 ......... 73
I LA.2. FISCHER-SEBASTIAN RIVER CONSERVATION AREA - SECOND
AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT FOR STATE COST -SHARE
REIMBURSEMENT........................................77
2
B, Pbb87
11.E
2001-2002 BUDGET WORKSHOP/HEARING SCHEDULE .. I.. 1.. 79
I LG, VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS -
BRIDGES AND CULVERTS AT 77TH STREET AT 90TH AND 102ND
AVENUES AND 89TH STREET AT 96TH COURT - FILL STORAGE
ON PROPERTY OF EDMUND ANSIN . I.. I ............... I .... 80
I LH. 1. WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE - ROCHA
CONTROLS - BENRO ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION
(SCADA PLAN) ............... 1 ..... 1.. 1.. 1 ........ 1 ....... 81
11.H.2. RFP AUTHORIZATION FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH
REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER TREATMENT PLANT MEMBRANE
REPLACEMENT - REPORT OF CAMP DRESSER & McKEE ...... 83
I LH.3, RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-037 AND 2001-038 - EXTENSION OF
WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US# 1 - CITY OF
SEBASTIAN - RESOLUTIONS I AND II - PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ............................................. 85
11.I. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLAN UPDATE
2001/2002 91
13.A. CHAIRMAN GINN - CENSUS/REAPPORTIONMENT ............ 92
13.13, VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - RESOLUTION NO, 2001-039
SUPPORTING THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SCENIC HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PROPOSAL TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .... 1 1. 1.. 1.. 1 ......... 93
13.13.2, VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL
AUTHORIZATION IN REGARD TO LOST TREE ISLANDS 11..11. 95
14.A
14.13
14.0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 11..1..1........... 1 1. 1 1.. 95
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ....... 1 .... 1 ........ 1.. 1 95
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ..................... .
3
F
11.E
2001-2002 BUDGET WORKSHOP/HEARING SCHEDULE .. I.. 1.. 79
I LG, VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS -
BRIDGES AND CULVERTS AT 77TH STREET AT 90TH AND 102ND
AVENUES AND 89TH STREET AT 96TH COURT - FILL STORAGE
ON PROPERTY OF EDMUND ANSIN . I.. I ............... I .... 80
I LH. 1. WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE - ROCHA
CONTROLS - BENRO ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION
(SCADA PLAN) ............... 1 ..... 1.. 1.. 1 ........ 1 ....... 81
11.H.2. RFP AUTHORIZATION FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH
REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER TREATMENT PLANT MEMBRANE
REPLACEMENT - REPORT OF CAMP DRESSER & McKEE ...... 83
I LH.3, RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-037 AND 2001-038 - EXTENSION OF
WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US# 1 - CITY OF
SEBASTIAN - RESOLUTIONS I AND II - PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ............................................. 85
11.I. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLAN UPDATE
2001/2002 91
13.A. CHAIRMAN GINN - CENSUS/REAPPORTIONMENT ............ 92
13.13, VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - RESOLUTION NO, 2001-039
SUPPORTING THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SCENIC HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PROPOSAL TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .... 1 1. 1.. 1.. 1 ......... 93
13.13.2, VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL
AUTHORIZATION IN REGARD TO LOST TREE ISLANDS 11..11. 95
14.A
14.13
14.0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 11..1..1........... 1 1. 1 1.. 95
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ....... 1 .... 1 ........ 1.. 1 95
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ..................... .
3
F
11.E
2001-2002 BUDGET WORKSHOP/HEARING SCHEDULE .. I.. 1.. 79
I LG, VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS -
BRIDGES AND CULVERTS AT 77TH STREET AT 90TH AND 102ND
AVENUES AND 89TH STREET AT 96TH COURT - FILL STORAGE
ON PROPERTY OF EDMUND ANSIN . I.. I ............... I .... 80
I LH. 1. WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE - ROCHA
CONTROLS - BENRO ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION
(SCADA PLAN) ............... 1 ..... 1.. 1.. 1 ........ 1 ....... 81
11.H.2. RFP AUTHORIZATION FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH
REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER TREATMENT PLANT MEMBRANE
REPLACEMENT - REPORT OF CAMP DRESSER & McKEE ...... 83
I LH.3, RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-037 AND 2001-038 - EXTENSION OF
WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US# 1 - CITY OF
SEBASTIAN - RESOLUTIONS I AND II - PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ............................................. 85
11.I. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLAN UPDATE
2001/2002 91
13.A. CHAIRMAN GINN - CENSUS/REAPPORTIONMENT ............ 92
13.13, VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - RESOLUTION NO, 2001-039
SUPPORTING THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SCENIC HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PROPOSAL TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .... 1 1. 1.. 1.. 1 ......... 93
13.13.2, VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL
AUTHORIZATION IN REGARD TO LOST TREE ISLANDS 11..11. 95
14.A
14.13
14.0
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 11..1..1........... 1 1. 1 1.. 95
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ....... 1 .... 1 ........ 1.. 1 95
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ..................... .
3
F
April 3, 2001
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25`" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, April 3, 2001. Present were Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman; Ruth Stanbridge, Vice
Chairman; Commissioners Fran B. Adams; Kenneth R. Macht; and John W. Tippin. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Bill Nigh, Community Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested the addition of item 13.13.2., Authorization to
Travel Concerning Lost Tree Islands
April 3, 2001
1
�T� i 1 Ps
April 3, 2001
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25`" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, April 3, 2001. Present were Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman; Ruth Stanbridge, Vice
Chairman; Commissioners Fran B. Adams; Kenneth R. Macht; and John W. Tippin. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Bill Nigh, Community Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested the addition of item 13.13.2., Authorization to
Travel Concerning Lost Tree Islands
April 3, 2001
1
�T� i 1 Ps
April 3, 2001
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25`" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, April 3, 2001. Present were Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman; Ruth Stanbridge, Vice
Chairman; Commissioners Fran B. Adams; Kenneth R. Macht; and John W. Tippin. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Bill Nigh, Community Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested the addition of item 13.13.2., Authorization to
Travel Concerning Lost Tree Islands
April 3, 2001
1
�T� i 1 Ps
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously made the above
addition to the agenda. -
5.A. PROCL
- FLORIDA (
RATE
I' s
ONS -
COUNTY - APRIL 2001
Chairman Ginn read the following proclamation and presented it to Commander Gene
Lee who accepted with thanks as a representative of the Sons of the Confederacy Veterans.
DESIGNATING APRIL, 2001
AS FLORIDA CONFEDERATE
HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, April is the month in which the Confederate States of America began
and ended their four-year struggle for a sovereign and independent nation; and
WHEREAS, our state constitution sets aside April 26th as a day to observe and
honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the Civil War, and
WHEREAS, in proportion to its population, Florida contributed more soldiers and
sailors to the Confederate services than any other state; and
WHEREAS, all Floridians should be knowledgeable of the history of the Civil War
battles fought here, including those at Olustee and at Natural Bridge; and
WHEREAS, we study the war between the Blue and the Gray for the same
reason we study all wars, with a view to understanding the historical events which
compelled them, so we may continue to learn to live together and seek to avoid future
conflicts:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of April, 2001
be designated as
FLORIDA CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH
in Indian River County, and
the
Board urges all residents to engage
in historical study of
the events of 1861 to 1865
and
to solemnly contemplate that time.
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairma
April 3, 2001
BIS 11 1 b 2
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously made the above
addition to the agenda. -
5.A. PROCL
- FLORIDA (
RATE
I' s
ONS -
COUNTY - APRIL 2001
Chairman Ginn read the following proclamation and presented it to Commander Gene
Lee who accepted with thanks as a representative of the Sons of the Confederacy Veterans.
DESIGNATING APRIL, 2001
AS FLORIDA CONFEDERATE
HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, April is the month in which the Confederate States of America began
and ended their four-year struggle for a sovereign and independent nation; and
WHEREAS, our state constitution sets aside April 26th as a day to observe and
honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the Civil War, and
WHEREAS, in proportion to its population, Florida contributed more soldiers and
sailors to the Confederate services than any other state; and
WHEREAS, all Floridians should be knowledgeable of the history of the Civil War
battles fought here, including those at Olustee and at Natural Bridge; and
WHEREAS, we study the war between the Blue and the Gray for the same
reason we study all wars, with a view to understanding the historical events which
compelled them, so we may continue to learn to live together and seek to avoid future
conflicts:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of April, 2001
be designated as
FLORIDA CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH
in Indian River County, and
the
Board urges all residents to engage
in historical study of
the events of 1861 to 1865
and
to solemnly contemplate that time.
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairma
April 3, 2001
BIS 11 1 b 2
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously made the above
addition to the agenda. -
5.A. PROCL
- FLORIDA (
RATE
I' s
ONS -
COUNTY - APRIL 2001
Chairman Ginn read the following proclamation and presented it to Commander Gene
Lee who accepted with thanks as a representative of the Sons of the Confederacy Veterans.
DESIGNATING APRIL, 2001
AS FLORIDA CONFEDERATE
HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, April is the month in which the Confederate States of America began
and ended their four-year struggle for a sovereign and independent nation; and
WHEREAS, our state constitution sets aside April 26th as a day to observe and
honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the Civil War, and
WHEREAS, in proportion to its population, Florida contributed more soldiers and
sailors to the Confederate services than any other state; and
WHEREAS, all Floridians should be knowledgeable of the history of the Civil War
battles fought here, including those at Olustee and at Natural Bridge; and
WHEREAS, we study the war between the Blue and the Gray for the same
reason we study all wars, with a view to understanding the historical events which
compelled them, so we may continue to learn to live together and seek to avoid future
conflicts:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of April, 2001
be designated as
FLORIDA CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH
in Indian River County, and
the
Board urges all residents to engage
in historical study of
the events of 1861 to 1865
and
to solemnly contemplate that time.
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairma
April 3, 2001
BIS 11 1 b 2
O.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRU
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of February 13, 2001. There were none.
6.B. APP
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 13, 2001, as
written and distributed.
MINUTES - FEBRUARY 2
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of February 20, 2001. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge. the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 20, 2001, as
written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that Item 7.F. be separated from the Consent Agenda.
7.A. Reports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
1) Indian River County District School Board Report No. 01-115
Financial, Operational, and Federal Single Audit Report for FY ended
06/30/00
2) St. Johns River Water Management District Annual Financial Audit for
1999-2000 for FY ended 09/30/00
April 3, 2001
3
i PG 6 91
O.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRU
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of February 13, 2001. There were none.
6.B. APP
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 13, 2001, as
written and distributed.
MINUTES - FEBRUARY 2
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of February 20, 2001. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge. the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 20, 2001, as
written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that Item 7.F. be separated from the Consent Agenda.
7.A. Reports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
1) Indian River County District School Board Report No. 01-115
Financial, Operational, and Federal Single Audit Report for FY ended
06/30/00
2) St. Johns River Water Management District Annual Financial Audit for
1999-2000 for FY ended 09/30/00
April 3, 2001
3
i PG 6 91
O.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRU
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of February 13, 2001. There were none.
6.B. APP
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 13, 2001, as
written and distributed.
MINUTES - FEBRUARY 2
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of February 20, 2001. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge. the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 20, 2001, as
written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that Item 7.F. be separated from the Consent Agenda.
7.A. Reports
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
1) Indian River County District School Board Report No. 01-115
Financial, Operational, and Federal Single Audit Report for FY ended
06/30/00
2) St. Johns River Water Management District Annual Financial Audit for
1999-2000 for FY ended 09/30/00
April 3, 2001
3
i PG 6 91
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of March 9, 2001 to March 15, 2001.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
March 9-15, 2001, as requested.
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021066
THOMAS, JAMES SR
2001-03-09
873.10
0021067
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2001-03-12
17,012.50
0021068
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2001-03-12
3,936.30
0021069
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
2001-03-12
4,449.11
0021070
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
2001-03-12
2,229.45
0021071
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
2001-03-12
480.60
0021072
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2001-03-12
10,300.84
0021073
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2001-03-12
194.40
0021074
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
2001-03-14
138.50
0021075
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
2001-03-14
115.38
0021076
IRS - ACS
2001-03-14
50.00
0021077
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
2001-03-14
142.85
0021078
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC,
2001-03-14
2,560.00
0021079
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
2001-03-14
79,498.75
0021080
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
2001-03-14
213.83
0021081
NACO/SOUTHEAST
2001-03-14
9,176.78
0021082
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
2001-03-14
455.43
April 3, 2001
i i'b 9 2
4
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of March 9, 2001 to March 15, 2001.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
March 9-15, 2001, as requested.
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021066
THOMAS, JAMES SR
2001-03-09
873.10
0021067
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2001-03-12
17,012.50
0021068
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2001-03-12
3,936.30
0021069
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
2001-03-12
4,449.11
0021070
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
2001-03-12
2,229.45
0021071
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
2001-03-12
480.60
0021072
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2001-03-12
10,300.84
0021073
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2001-03-12
194.40
0021074
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
2001-03-14
138.50
0021075
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
2001-03-14
115.38
0021076
IRS - ACS
2001-03-14
50.00
0021077
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
2001-03-14
142.85
0021078
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC,
2001-03-14
2,560.00
0021079
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
2001-03-14
79,498.75
0021080
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
2001-03-14
213.83
0021081
NACO/SOUTHEAST
2001-03-14
9,176.78
0021082
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
2001-03-14
455.43
April 3, 2001
i i'b 9 2
4
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of March 9, 2001 to March 15, 2001.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the period
March 9-15, 2001, as requested.
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021066
THOMAS, JAMES SR
2001-03-09
873.10
0021067
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2001-03-12
17,012.50
0021068
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2001-03-12
3,936.30
0021069
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
2001-03-12
4,449.11
0021070
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
2001-03-12
2,229.45
0021071
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
2001-03-12
480.60
0021072
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
2001-03-12
10,300.84
0021073
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
2001-03-12
194.40
0021074
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
2001-03-14
138.50
0021075
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
2001-03-14
115.38
0021076
IRS - ACS
2001-03-14
50.00
0021077
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
2001-03-14
142.85
0021078
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC,
2001-03-14
2,560.00
0021079
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
2001-03-14
79,498.75
0021080
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
2001-03-14
213.83
0021081
NACO/SOUTHEAST
2001-03-14
9,176.78
0021082
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
2001-03-14
455.43
April 3, 2001
i i'b 9 2
4
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021083
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
2001-03-14
23.08
0021084
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
2001-03-14
120.92
0021085
FL SDU
2001-03-14
6,342.01
0298816
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2001-03-15
103.00
0298817
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
2001-03-15
478.12
0298818
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
2001-03-15
214.80
0298819
AMERON HOMES, INC
2001-03-15
500.00
0298820
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
2001-03-15
74.88
0298821
0298822
0298823
AT YOUR SERVICE
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
379.80
37.33
525.77
0298824
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2001-03-15
742.15
0298825
0298826
ABS PUMPS, INC
ALL POWER SERVICES, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
20,754.92
211.00
0298827
0298828
0298829
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
29.95
87.00
266.08
0298830
0298831
ANDO BUILDING CORP
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER,INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
500.00
437.44
0298832
0298833
0298834
A T & T
AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
116.68
60.00
612.99
0298835
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
2001-03-15
586.14
0298836
0298837
ARCH WIRELESS
A T & T
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
464.14
115.98
0298838
0298839
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
60,840.34
890.90
0298840
0298841
ABC PRINTING CO
AVERY DENNISON CORP
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
200.30
20,626.80
0298842
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
2001-03-15
126.00
0298843
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
2001-03-15
22.80
0298844
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
2001-03-15
18,662.25
0298845
ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
2001-03-15
345.00
0298846
ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC
2001-03-15
256.80
0298847
ACER LEGAL RESOURCES INC
2001-03-15
1,458.00
0298848
0298849
0298850
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
8,084.00
61418.91
70.00
0298851
0298852
0298853
0298854
0298855
0298856
0298857
0298858
0298859
0298860
0298861
0298862
0298863
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
BURGOON BERGER
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BOYETTE, JAMES E
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BARER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BELLSOUTH
BOBBY'S PLUMBING
BLUE CROSS/SLUE SHIELD OF
BEST POWER
BARTON, JEFFREY K
BASS-CARLTON SOD INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
39,399.75
11500.00
1,189.13
7,951.66
67.28
186.00
28.76
23,790.93
77.50
37,242.55
567.53
2,013.36
432.00
0298864
0298865
0298866
0298867
BRANTLEY, RICHARD A
BIO -CHEM RESOURCES
BLACKMON, SHANITA
BUSHNELL CORP
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
925.00
546.10
41.20
741.37
0298868
BANGEL, PAUL G
2001-03-15
608.71
0298869
0298870
0298871
BIOMASS PROCESSING
BEINDORF, JIM
BEYER, DAMON J
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
115,099.27
144.20
145.00
April 3, 2001
5
�► PG v 9 3
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021083
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
2001-03-14
23.08
0021084
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
2001-03-14
120.92
0021085
FL SDU
2001-03-14
6,342.01
0298816
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2001-03-15
103.00
0298817
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
2001-03-15
478.12
0298818
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
2001-03-15
214.80
0298819
AMERON HOMES, INC
2001-03-15
500.00
0298820
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
2001-03-15
74.88
0298821
0298822
0298823
AT YOUR SERVICE
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
379.80
37.33
525.77
0298824
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2001-03-15
742.15
0298825
0298826
ABS PUMPS, INC
ALL POWER SERVICES, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
20,754.92
211.00
0298827
0298828
0298829
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
29.95
87.00
266.08
0298830
0298831
ANDO BUILDING CORP
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER,INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
500.00
437.44
0298832
0298833
0298834
A T & T
AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
116.68
60.00
612.99
0298835
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
2001-03-15
586.14
0298836
0298837
ARCH WIRELESS
A T & T
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
464.14
115.98
0298838
0298839
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
60,840.34
890.90
0298840
0298841
ABC PRINTING CO
AVERY DENNISON CORP
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
200.30
20,626.80
0298842
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
2001-03-15
126.00
0298843
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
2001-03-15
22.80
0298844
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
2001-03-15
18,662.25
0298845
ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
2001-03-15
345.00
0298846
ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC
2001-03-15
256.80
0298847
ACER LEGAL RESOURCES INC
2001-03-15
1,458.00
0298848
0298849
0298850
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
8,084.00
61418.91
70.00
0298851
0298852
0298853
0298854
0298855
0298856
0298857
0298858
0298859
0298860
0298861
0298862
0298863
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
BURGOON BERGER
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BOYETTE, JAMES E
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BARER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BELLSOUTH
BOBBY'S PLUMBING
BLUE CROSS/SLUE SHIELD OF
BEST POWER
BARTON, JEFFREY K
BASS-CARLTON SOD INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
39,399.75
11500.00
1,189.13
7,951.66
67.28
186.00
28.76
23,790.93
77.50
37,242.55
567.53
2,013.36
432.00
0298864
0298865
0298866
0298867
BRANTLEY, RICHARD A
BIO -CHEM RESOURCES
BLACKMON, SHANITA
BUSHNELL CORP
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
925.00
546.10
41.20
741.37
0298868
BANGEL, PAUL G
2001-03-15
608.71
0298869
0298870
0298871
BIOMASS PROCESSING
BEINDORF, JIM
BEYER, DAMON J
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
115,099.27
144.20
145.00
April 3, 2001
5
�► PG v 9 3
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021083
WISCONSIN SUPPORT COLLECTIONS
2001-03-14
23.08
0021084
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
2001-03-14
120.92
0021085
FL SDU
2001-03-14
6,342.01
0298816
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
2001-03-15
103.00
0298817
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
2001-03-15
478.12
0298818
ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS, INC
2001-03-15
214.80
0298819
AMERON HOMES, INC
2001-03-15
500.00
0298820
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
2001-03-15
74.88
0298821
0298822
0298823
AT YOUR SERVICE
ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
379.80
37.33
525.77
0298824
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2001-03-15
742.15
0298825
0298826
ABS PUMPS, INC
ALL POWER SERVICES, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
20,754.92
211.00
0298827
0298828
0298829
ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
29.95
87.00
266.08
0298830
0298831
ANDO BUILDING CORP
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER,INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
500.00
437.44
0298832
0298833
0298834
A T & T
AMERIGAS-FT PIERCE
AUTO PARTS OF VERO, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
116.68
60.00
612.99
0298835
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
2001-03-15
586.14
0298836
0298837
ARCH WIRELESS
A T & T
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
464.14
115.98
0298838
0298839
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND
ATLANTIC REPORTING
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
60,840.34
890.90
0298840
0298841
ABC PRINTING CO
AVERY DENNISON CORP
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
200.30
20,626.80
0298842
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
2001-03-15
126.00
0298843
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
2001-03-15
22.80
0298844
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
2001-03-15
18,662.25
0298845
ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
2001-03-15
345.00
0298846
ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC
2001-03-15
256.80
0298847
ACER LEGAL RESOURCES INC
2001-03-15
1,458.00
0298848
0298849
0298850
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
8,084.00
61418.91
70.00
0298851
0298852
0298853
0298854
0298855
0298856
0298857
0298858
0298859
0298860
0298861
0298862
0298863
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
BURGOON BERGER
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BOYETTE, JAMES E
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BARER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BELLSOUTH
BOBBY'S PLUMBING
BLUE CROSS/SLUE SHIELD OF
BEST POWER
BARTON, JEFFREY K
BASS-CARLTON SOD INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
39,399.75
11500.00
1,189.13
7,951.66
67.28
186.00
28.76
23,790.93
77.50
37,242.55
567.53
2,013.36
432.00
0298864
0298865
0298866
0298867
BRANTLEY, RICHARD A
BIO -CHEM RESOURCES
BLACKMON, SHANITA
BUSHNELL CORP
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
925.00
546.10
41.20
741.37
0298868
BANGEL, PAUL G
2001-03-15
608.71
0298869
0298870
0298871
BIOMASS PROCESSING
BEINDORF, JIM
BEYER, DAMON J
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
115,099.27
144.20
145.00
April 3, 2001
5
�► PG v 9 3
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0298872
BAKKEN, DAVID C MD -
0298873
BARBER & ASSOCIATES INC
0298874
BELLSOUTH
0298875
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
0298876
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
0298877
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
0298878
COLLINS BROWN CALDWELL AND
0298879
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
0298880
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
0298881
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
0298882
CHEMSEARCH
0298883
CLINIC PHARMACY
0298884
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
0298885
COGAR, ROBERT
0298886
CALL ONE, INC
0298887
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES
0298888
0298889
0298890
0298891
0298892
0298893
0298894
0298895
0298896
0298897
0298898
0298899
0298900
0298901
0298902
0298903
0298904
0298905
0298906
0298907
0298908
0298909
0298910
0298911
0298912
0298913
0298914
0298915
0298916
0298917
0298918
0298919
0298920
0298921
0298922
0298923
0298924
0298925
0298926
0298927
0298928
0298929
April 3, 2001
CLIFFORD, MIKE
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF
CLEVELAND GOLF CO., INC.
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS
COLUMBIA PROPANE
COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
CHOICE PROCESS -ORLANDO
CHAMBERS, JESSE LEE JR
CAPONI, FLORENCE B
COURTYARD TAMPA BRANDON
CHARTONE INC
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
DELTA SUPPLY CO
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
DUN & BRADSTREET
DUVAL FORD
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DADE PAPER COMPANY
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIR
DOYLE, STEVE
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
DUBUC, TERRY
DAVID H PAUL INC
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
EAST COAST LUMBER
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
EQUIFAX CITY DIRECTORY
F W P C 0 A TRAINING
FEDEX
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA COURT REPORTERS
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Bs U9 Lt
R
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
900.00
683.00
228.08
13,147.15
198.00
122.36
3,250.00
1,571.71
168.00
1,000.00
741.92
131.89
5,467.27
78.88
118.69
34,838.88
300.00
427.50
56.00
176.78
39.43
18,799.83
57.99
581.10
80.00
80.00
383.67
327.00
26.18
1,638.00
1,545.00
709.38
810.16
1,568.50
400.00
216.15
290.38
1,149.12
175.01
1,000.00
19.14
1,146.50
300.00
519.70
12.50
639.97
3,000.00
217.50
875.00
281.16
85.00
573.40
184.90
8,782.82
154.59
106,979.00
20.00
50.00
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0298872
BAKKEN, DAVID C MD -
0298873
BARBER & ASSOCIATES INC
0298874
BELLSOUTH
0298875
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
0298876
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
0298877
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
0298878
COLLINS BROWN CALDWELL AND
0298879
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
0298880
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
0298881
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
0298882
CHEMSEARCH
0298883
CLINIC PHARMACY
0298884
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
0298885
COGAR, ROBERT
0298886
CALL ONE, INC
0298887
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES
0298888
0298889
0298890
0298891
0298892
0298893
0298894
0298895
0298896
0298897
0298898
0298899
0298900
0298901
0298902
0298903
0298904
0298905
0298906
0298907
0298908
0298909
0298910
0298911
0298912
0298913
0298914
0298915
0298916
0298917
0298918
0298919
0298920
0298921
0298922
0298923
0298924
0298925
0298926
0298927
0298928
0298929
April 3, 2001
CLIFFORD, MIKE
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF
CLEVELAND GOLF CO., INC.
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS
COLUMBIA PROPANE
COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
CHOICE PROCESS -ORLANDO
CHAMBERS, JESSE LEE JR
CAPONI, FLORENCE B
COURTYARD TAMPA BRANDON
CHARTONE INC
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
DELTA SUPPLY CO
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
DUN & BRADSTREET
DUVAL FORD
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DADE PAPER COMPANY
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIR
DOYLE, STEVE
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
DUBUC, TERRY
DAVID H PAUL INC
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
EAST COAST LUMBER
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
EQUIFAX CITY DIRECTORY
F W P C 0 A TRAINING
FEDEX
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA COURT REPORTERS
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Bs U9 Lt
R
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
900.00
683.00
228.08
13,147.15
198.00
122.36
3,250.00
1,571.71
168.00
1,000.00
741.92
131.89
5,467.27
78.88
118.69
34,838.88
300.00
427.50
56.00
176.78
39.43
18,799.83
57.99
581.10
80.00
80.00
383.67
327.00
26.18
1,638.00
1,545.00
709.38
810.16
1,568.50
400.00
216.15
290.38
1,149.12
175.01
1,000.00
19.14
1,146.50
300.00
519.70
12.50
639.97
3,000.00
217.50
875.00
281.16
85.00
573.40
184.90
8,782.82
154.59
106,979.00
20.00
50.00
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0298872
BAKKEN, DAVID C MD -
0298873
BARBER & ASSOCIATES INC
0298874
BELLSOUTH
0298875
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
0298876
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
0298877
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
0298878
COLLINS BROWN CALDWELL AND
0298879
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
0298880
CORBIN, SHIRLEY E
0298881
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
0298882
CHEMSEARCH
0298883
CLINIC PHARMACY
0298884
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
0298885
COGAR, ROBERT
0298886
CALL ONE, INC
0298887
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES
0298888
0298889
0298890
0298891
0298892
0298893
0298894
0298895
0298896
0298897
0298898
0298899
0298900
0298901
0298902
0298903
0298904
0298905
0298906
0298907
0298908
0298909
0298910
0298911
0298912
0298913
0298914
0298915
0298916
0298917
0298918
0298919
0298920
0298921
0298922
0298923
0298924
0298925
0298926
0298927
0298928
0298929
April 3, 2001
CLIFFORD, MIKE
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
COPYCO, LIBERTY DIV OF
CLEVELAND GOLF CO., INC.
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS
COLUMBIA PROPANE
COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
CHOICE PROCESS -ORLANDO
CHAMBERS, JESSE LEE JR
CAPONI, FLORENCE B
COURTYARD TAMPA BRANDON
CHARTONE INC
CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING &
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
DELTA SUPPLY CO
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
DUN & BRADSTREET
DUVAL FORD
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DADE PAPER COMPANY
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIR
DOYLE, STEVE
DOLPHIN DATA PRODUCTS INC
DUBUC, TERRY
DAVID H PAUL INC
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
EAST COAST LUMBER
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
EQUIFAX CITY DIRECTORY
F W P C 0 A TRAINING
FEDEX
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA COURT REPORTERS
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE
FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Bs U9 Lt
R
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
900.00
683.00
228.08
13,147.15
198.00
122.36
3,250.00
1,571.71
168.00
1,000.00
741.92
131.89
5,467.27
78.88
118.69
34,838.88
300.00
427.50
56.00
176.78
39.43
18,799.83
57.99
581.10
80.00
80.00
383.67
327.00
26.18
1,638.00
1,545.00
709.38
810.16
1,568.50
400.00
216.15
290.38
1,149.12
175.01
1,000.00
19.14
1,146.50
300.00
519.70
12.50
639.97
3,000.00
217.50
875.00
281.16
85.00
573.40
184.90
8,782.82
154.59
106,979.00
20.00
50.00
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0298930 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001-03-15 25.00
0298931 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2001-03-15 105.00
0298932 FACTICON, INC 20CI--03-15 900.00
0298933 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT 2C^'_-03-15 21427.12
0298934 FLORIDA COUNTIES PUBLICATION 2001-03-15 33.50
0298935 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2001-03-15 746.59
0298936 FULLER, APRIL L 2001-03-15 63.08
0298937 FUCHS, SUSAN 2001-03-15 24.00
0298938 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR, LTD 2001-03-15 500.00
0298939 FORTRES GRAND CORP 2001-03-15 287.00
0298940 FELDMAN, MOISES MD 2001-03-15 1,225.00
0298941 GALE GROUP, THE 2001-03-15 210.35
0298942 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC 2001-03-15 29.33
0298943 GENTILE, DENNIS 2001-03-15 80.60
0298944 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 2001-03-15 22.33
0298945 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 2001-03-15 8,041.56
0298946 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2001-03-15 747.65
0298947 GRAY SUPPLY COMPANY 2001-03-15 35.71
0298948 GEAC COMPUTERS INC 2001-03-15 3,434.33
0298949 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 2001-03-15 13,754.66
0298950 GRAPHX PRINTING 2001-03-15 783.00
0298951 G E CAPITAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE 2001-03-15 1,026.40
0298952 GORMAN, MINDY 2001-03-15 38.62
0298953 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2001-03-15 341.41
0298954 HARRISON COMPANY, THE 2001-03-15 149.60
0298955 HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC 2001-03-15 325.18
0298956 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2001-03-15 15,075.00
0298957 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 2001-03-15 133.00
0298958 HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER 2001-03-15 2,083.33
0298959 HACH COMPANY 2001-03-15 192.55
0298960 HILL MANUFACTURING 2001-03-15 1,345.00
0298961 HORIZON NURSERY 2001-03-15 2,890.00
0298962 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2001-03-15 30.00
0298963 HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER 2001-03-15 10.95
0298964 HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES 2001-03-15 6,000.00
0298965 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001-03-15 2,000.00
0298966 HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING 2001-03-15 1,353.00
0298967 RANSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2001-03-15 74,158.87
0298968 HUNTER, TAMIKA 2001-03-15 41.20
0298969 HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE 2001-03-15 877.40
0298970 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2001-03-15 71562.05
0298971 HARTSFIELD, KAREN K 2001-03-15 276.50
0298972 HOLYCROSS, CURTIS 2001-03-15 279.50
0298973 HAMMOND, MARILYN 2001-03-15 500.00_
0298974 HOMESTYLES.COM 2001-03-15 39.95
0298975 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 200.00
0298976 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2001-03-15 73.65
0298977 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 100.00
0298978 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001-03-15 803.34
0298979 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC 2001-03-15 636.68
0298980 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2001-03-15 78.96
0298981 INDIAN RIVER MEDICAL 2001-03-15 500.00
0298982 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 30.00
0298983 IBM CORPORATION 2001-03-15 923.17
0298984 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 2001-03-15 154.53
0298985 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2001-03-15 228,982.20
0298986 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2001-03-15 189.11
0298987 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S 2001-03-15 30.00
April 3, 2001
7
BK Q t r iJ 0 J
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0298930 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001-03-15 25.00
0298931 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2001-03-15 105.00
0298932 FACTICON, INC 20CI--03-15 900.00
0298933 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT 2C^'_-03-15 21427.12
0298934 FLORIDA COUNTIES PUBLICATION 2001-03-15 33.50
0298935 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2001-03-15 746.59
0298936 FULLER, APRIL L 2001-03-15 63.08
0298937 FUCHS, SUSAN 2001-03-15 24.00
0298938 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR, LTD 2001-03-15 500.00
0298939 FORTRES GRAND CORP 2001-03-15 287.00
0298940 FELDMAN, MOISES MD 2001-03-15 1,225.00
0298941 GALE GROUP, THE 2001-03-15 210.35
0298942 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC 2001-03-15 29.33
0298943 GENTILE, DENNIS 2001-03-15 80.60
0298944 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 2001-03-15 22.33
0298945 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 2001-03-15 8,041.56
0298946 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2001-03-15 747.65
0298947 GRAY SUPPLY COMPANY 2001-03-15 35.71
0298948 GEAC COMPUTERS INC 2001-03-15 3,434.33
0298949 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 2001-03-15 13,754.66
0298950 GRAPHX PRINTING 2001-03-15 783.00
0298951 G E CAPITAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE 2001-03-15 1,026.40
0298952 GORMAN, MINDY 2001-03-15 38.62
0298953 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2001-03-15 341.41
0298954 HARRISON COMPANY, THE 2001-03-15 149.60
0298955 HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC 2001-03-15 325.18
0298956 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2001-03-15 15,075.00
0298957 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 2001-03-15 133.00
0298958 HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER 2001-03-15 2,083.33
0298959 HACH COMPANY 2001-03-15 192.55
0298960 HILL MANUFACTURING 2001-03-15 1,345.00
0298961 HORIZON NURSERY 2001-03-15 2,890.00
0298962 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2001-03-15 30.00
0298963 HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER 2001-03-15 10.95
0298964 HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES 2001-03-15 6,000.00
0298965 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001-03-15 2,000.00
0298966 HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING 2001-03-15 1,353.00
0298967 RANSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2001-03-15 74,158.87
0298968 HUNTER, TAMIKA 2001-03-15 41.20
0298969 HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE 2001-03-15 877.40
0298970 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2001-03-15 71562.05
0298971 HARTSFIELD, KAREN K 2001-03-15 276.50
0298972 HOLYCROSS, CURTIS 2001-03-15 279.50
0298973 HAMMOND, MARILYN 2001-03-15 500.00_
0298974 HOMESTYLES.COM 2001-03-15 39.95
0298975 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 200.00
0298976 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2001-03-15 73.65
0298977 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 100.00
0298978 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001-03-15 803.34
0298979 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC 2001-03-15 636.68
0298980 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2001-03-15 78.96
0298981 INDIAN RIVER MEDICAL 2001-03-15 500.00
0298982 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 30.00
0298983 IBM CORPORATION 2001-03-15 923.17
0298984 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 2001-03-15 154.53
0298985 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2001-03-15 228,982.20
0298986 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2001-03-15 189.11
0298987 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S 2001-03-15 30.00
April 3, 2001
7
BK Q t r iJ 0 J
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0298930 FELLSMERE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001-03-15 25.00
0298931 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2001-03-15 105.00
0298932 FACTICON, INC 20CI--03-15 900.00
0298933 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT 2C^'_-03-15 21427.12
0298934 FLORIDA COUNTIES PUBLICATION 2001-03-15 33.50
0298935 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2001-03-15 746.59
0298936 FULLER, APRIL L 2001-03-15 63.08
0298937 FUCHS, SUSAN 2001-03-15 24.00
0298938 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR, LTD 2001-03-15 500.00
0298939 FORTRES GRAND CORP 2001-03-15 287.00
0298940 FELDMAN, MOISES MD 2001-03-15 1,225.00
0298941 GALE GROUP, THE 2001-03-15 210.35
0298942 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC 2001-03-15 29.33
0298943 GENTILE, DENNIS 2001-03-15 80.60
0298944 GLIDDEN COMPANY, THE 2001-03-15 22.33
0298945 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC 2001-03-15 8,041.56
0298946 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2001-03-15 747.65
0298947 GRAY SUPPLY COMPANY 2001-03-15 35.71
0298948 GEAC COMPUTERS INC 2001-03-15 3,434.33
0298949 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 2001-03-15 13,754.66
0298950 GRAPHX PRINTING 2001-03-15 783.00
0298951 G E CAPITAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE 2001-03-15 1,026.40
0298952 GORMAN, MINDY 2001-03-15 38.62
0298953 HARRIS SANITATION, INC 2001-03-15 341.41
0298954 HARRISON COMPANY, THE 2001-03-15 149.60
0298955 HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC 2001-03-15 325.18
0298956 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2001-03-15 15,075.00
0298957 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO 2001-03-15 133.00
0298958 HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER 2001-03-15 2,083.33
0298959 HACH COMPANY 2001-03-15 192.55
0298960 HILL MANUFACTURING 2001-03-15 1,345.00
0298961 HORIZON NURSERY 2001-03-15 2,890.00
0298962 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2001-03-15 30.00
0298963 HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER 2001-03-15 10.95
0298964 HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES 2001-03-15 6,000.00
0298965 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001-03-15 2,000.00
0298966 HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING 2001-03-15 1,353.00
0298967 RANSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2001-03-15 74,158.87
0298968 HUNTER, TAMIKA 2001-03-15 41.20
0298969 HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE 2001-03-15 877.40
0298970 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 2001-03-15 71562.05
0298971 HARTSFIELD, KAREN K 2001-03-15 276.50
0298972 HOLYCROSS, CURTIS 2001-03-15 279.50
0298973 HAMMOND, MARILYN 2001-03-15 500.00_
0298974 HOMESTYLES.COM 2001-03-15 39.95
0298975 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 200.00
0298976 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2001-03-15 73.65
0298977 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 100.00
0298978 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001-03-15 803.34
0298979 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN, INC 2001-03-15 636.68
0298980 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2001-03-15 78.96
0298981 INDIAN RIVER MEDICAL 2001-03-15 500.00
0298982 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001-03-15 30.00
0298983 IBM CORPORATION 2001-03-15 923.17
0298984 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC 2001-03-15 154.53
0298985 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE- 2001-03-15 228,982.20
0298986 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 2001-03-15 189.11
0298987 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S 2001-03-15 30.00
April 3, 2001
7
BK Q t r iJ 0 J
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0298988 INDIAN RIVER TRAILER 2001-03-15 1,800.00
0298989 INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS 2001-03-15 154.00
0298990 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2001-03-15 - 48.77
0298991 INDIAN RIVER PRIMARY CARE 2001-03-15 41.50
0298992 JUDICIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 2001-03-15 290.00
0298993 JOHN VETTER & SONS, INC 2001-03-15 10,621.00
0298994 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001-03-15 1,547.66
0298995 JEFFERSON, CHRISTOPHER A 2001-03-15 80.00
0298996 JUDAH, HUSTON 2001-03-15 61.80
0298997 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 2001-03-15 11783.00
0298998 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC 2001-03-15 19,130.45
0298999 KEY, PATRICIA W 2001-03-15 168.00
0299000 KOUNS, DARLENE 2001-03-15 82.40
0299001 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2001-03-15 3,015.00
0299002 KELLER, JENAE 2001-03-15 38.62
0299003 LAMBERT, JANE S 2001-03-15 8.12
0299004 LAWMEN & SHOOTERS SUPPLY 2001-03-15 55.00
0299005 LAQUINTA INN 2001-03-15 118.00
0299006 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC 2001-03-15 357.10
0299007 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2001-03-15 485.25
0299008 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2001-03-15 697.00
0299009 LOPRESTI, ETTA 2001-03-15 69.00
0299010 LESCO, INC 2001-03-15 134.95
0299011 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC 2001-03-15 190.75
0299012 LUNA, JORGE 2001-03-15 200.85
0299013 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 2001-03-15 133.20
0299014 LUNA, JUVENAL 2001-03-15 180.25
0299015 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 2001-03-15 2,500.00
0299016 L L S DEVELOPMENT 2001-03-15 500.00
0299017 LARKINS, DARLENE 2001-03-15 165.00
0299018 L E PUBLISHERS 2001-03-15 50.00
0299019 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 2001-03-15 192.04
0299020 MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP 2001-03-15 46.53
0299021 MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC, INC 2001-03-15 51580.00
0299022 MUMFORD LIBRARY BOOKS, INC2001-03-15 317.70
0299023 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & 2001-03-15 1,240.00
0299024 MACHT, KENNETH 2001-03-15 1,540.97
0299025 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS 2001-03-15 5,093.75
0299026 MATRX MEDICAL REPAIR CTR 2001-03-15 13,491.00
0299027 MELODY MUSIC 2001-03-15 841.86
0299028 MDS MATRX 2001-03-15 263.60
0299029 MOUTENOT, ANNE 2001-03-15 24.36
0299030 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 2001-03-15 197.42
0299031 MULLER, MINTZ, KORNREICH, 2001-03-15 1,874.17
0299032 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2001-03-15 82.96
0299033 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 2001-03-15 366.00
0299034 MTW ROOFING COMPANY 2001-03-15 5,040.00
0299035 MARC INDUSTRIES 2001-03-15 818.45
0299036 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 2001-03-15 315.00
0299037 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001-03-15 11500.00
0299038 MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY 2001-03-15 110.00
0299039 MITCHELL TRAINING, INC 2001-03-15 1,800.00
0299040 MARTIN, CRISTI 2001-03-15 259.00
0299041 METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC 2001-03-15 325.00
0299042 MORTON SALT 2001-03-15 1,198.82
0299043 MCCULLY, WILLIAM KEITH 2001-03-15 6.00
0299044 MCGRIFF, BARBARA R 2001-03-15 135.00
0299045 MORSCH, RICHARD PA 2001-03-15 1,241.13
0299046 NOLTE, DAVID C 2001-03-15 3,500.00
April 3, 2001
0
EEK l
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0298988 INDIAN RIVER TRAILER 2001-03-15 1,800.00
0298989 INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS 2001-03-15 154.00
0298990 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2001-03-15 - 48.77
0298991 INDIAN RIVER PRIMARY CARE 2001-03-15 41.50
0298992 JUDICIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 2001-03-15 290.00
0298993 JOHN VETTER & SONS, INC 2001-03-15 10,621.00
0298994 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001-03-15 1,547.66
0298995 JEFFERSON, CHRISTOPHER A 2001-03-15 80.00
0298996 JUDAH, HUSTON 2001-03-15 61.80
0298997 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 2001-03-15 11783.00
0298998 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC 2001-03-15 19,130.45
0298999 KEY, PATRICIA W 2001-03-15 168.00
0299000 KOUNS, DARLENE 2001-03-15 82.40
0299001 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2001-03-15 3,015.00
0299002 KELLER, JENAE 2001-03-15 38.62
0299003 LAMBERT, JANE S 2001-03-15 8.12
0299004 LAWMEN & SHOOTERS SUPPLY 2001-03-15 55.00
0299005 LAQUINTA INN 2001-03-15 118.00
0299006 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC 2001-03-15 357.10
0299007 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2001-03-15 485.25
0299008 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2001-03-15 697.00
0299009 LOPRESTI, ETTA 2001-03-15 69.00
0299010 LESCO, INC 2001-03-15 134.95
0299011 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC 2001-03-15 190.75
0299012 LUNA, JORGE 2001-03-15 200.85
0299013 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 2001-03-15 133.20
0299014 LUNA, JUVENAL 2001-03-15 180.25
0299015 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 2001-03-15 2,500.00
0299016 L L S DEVELOPMENT 2001-03-15 500.00
0299017 LARKINS, DARLENE 2001-03-15 165.00
0299018 L E PUBLISHERS 2001-03-15 50.00
0299019 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 2001-03-15 192.04
0299020 MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP 2001-03-15 46.53
0299021 MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC, INC 2001-03-15 51580.00
0299022 MUMFORD LIBRARY BOOKS, INC2001-03-15 317.70
0299023 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & 2001-03-15 1,240.00
0299024 MACHT, KENNETH 2001-03-15 1,540.97
0299025 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS 2001-03-15 5,093.75
0299026 MATRX MEDICAL REPAIR CTR 2001-03-15 13,491.00
0299027 MELODY MUSIC 2001-03-15 841.86
0299028 MDS MATRX 2001-03-15 263.60
0299029 MOUTENOT, ANNE 2001-03-15 24.36
0299030 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 2001-03-15 197.42
0299031 MULLER, MINTZ, KORNREICH, 2001-03-15 1,874.17
0299032 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2001-03-15 82.96
0299033 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 2001-03-15 366.00
0299034 MTW ROOFING COMPANY 2001-03-15 5,040.00
0299035 MARC INDUSTRIES 2001-03-15 818.45
0299036 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 2001-03-15 315.00
0299037 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001-03-15 11500.00
0299038 MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY 2001-03-15 110.00
0299039 MITCHELL TRAINING, INC 2001-03-15 1,800.00
0299040 MARTIN, CRISTI 2001-03-15 259.00
0299041 METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC 2001-03-15 325.00
0299042 MORTON SALT 2001-03-15 1,198.82
0299043 MCCULLY, WILLIAM KEITH 2001-03-15 6.00
0299044 MCGRIFF, BARBARA R 2001-03-15 135.00
0299045 MORSCH, RICHARD PA 2001-03-15 1,241.13
0299046 NOLTE, DAVID C 2001-03-15 3,500.00
April 3, 2001
0
EEK l
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0298988 INDIAN RIVER TRAILER 2001-03-15 1,800.00
0298989 INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS 2001-03-15 154.00
0298990 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2001-03-15 - 48.77
0298991 INDIAN RIVER PRIMARY CARE 2001-03-15 41.50
0298992 JUDICIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 2001-03-15 290.00
0298993 JOHN VETTER & SONS, INC 2001-03-15 10,621.00
0298994 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001-03-15 1,547.66
0298995 JEFFERSON, CHRISTOPHER A 2001-03-15 80.00
0298996 JUDAH, HUSTON 2001-03-15 61.80
0298997 JONES CHEMICALS, INC 2001-03-15 11783.00
0298998 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC 2001-03-15 19,130.45
0298999 KEY, PATRICIA W 2001-03-15 168.00
0299000 KOUNS, DARLENE 2001-03-15 82.40
0299001 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL 2001-03-15 3,015.00
0299002 KELLER, JENAE 2001-03-15 38.62
0299003 LAMBERT, JANE S 2001-03-15 8.12
0299004 LAWMEN & SHOOTERS SUPPLY 2001-03-15 55.00
0299005 LAQUINTA INN 2001-03-15 118.00
0299006 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC 2001-03-15 357.10
0299007 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. 2001-03-15 485.25
0299008 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2001-03-15 697.00
0299009 LOPRESTI, ETTA 2001-03-15 69.00
0299010 LESCO, INC 2001-03-15 134.95
0299011 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC 2001-03-15 190.75
0299012 LUNA, JORGE 2001-03-15 200.85
0299013 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 2001-03-15 133.20
0299014 LUNA, JUVENAL 2001-03-15 180.25
0299015 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 2001-03-15 2,500.00
0299016 L L S DEVELOPMENT 2001-03-15 500.00
0299017 LARKINS, DARLENE 2001-03-15 165.00
0299018 L E PUBLISHERS 2001-03-15 50.00
0299019 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 2001-03-15 192.04
0299020 MARSHALL CAVENDISH CORP 2001-03-15 46.53
0299021 MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC, INC 2001-03-15 51580.00
0299022 MUMFORD LIBRARY BOOKS, INC2001-03-15 317.70
0299023 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & 2001-03-15 1,240.00
0299024 MACHT, KENNETH 2001-03-15 1,540.97
0299025 MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS 2001-03-15 5,093.75
0299026 MATRX MEDICAL REPAIR CTR 2001-03-15 13,491.00
0299027 MELODY MUSIC 2001-03-15 841.86
0299028 MDS MATRX 2001-03-15 263.60
0299029 MOUTENOT, ANNE 2001-03-15 24.36
0299030 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 2001-03-15 197.42
0299031 MULLER, MINTZ, KORNREICH, 2001-03-15 1,874.17
0299032 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2001-03-15 82.96
0299033 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 2001-03-15 366.00
0299034 MTW ROOFING COMPANY 2001-03-15 5,040.00
0299035 MARC INDUSTRIES 2001-03-15 818.45
0299036 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 2001-03-15 315.00
0299037 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001-03-15 11500.00
0299038 MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY 2001-03-15 110.00
0299039 MITCHELL TRAINING, INC 2001-03-15 1,800.00
0299040 MARTIN, CRISTI 2001-03-15 259.00
0299041 METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC 2001-03-15 325.00
0299042 MORTON SALT 2001-03-15 1,198.82
0299043 MCCULLY, WILLIAM KEITH 2001-03-15 6.00
0299044 MCGRIFF, BARBARA R 2001-03-15 135.00
0299045 MORSCH, RICHARD PA 2001-03-15 1,241.13
0299046 NOLTE, DAVID C 2001-03-15 3,500.00
April 3, 2001
0
EEK l
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299047
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
2001-03-15
152.79
0299048
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
2001-03-15
34,036.67
0299049
NATOA
2001-03-15
345.00
0299050
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
2001-03-15
316.09
0299051
NATIONAL PHILATELIC CENTRE
2001-03-15
1.98
0299052
NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES
2001-03-15
21467.11
0299053
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
2001-03-15
3,226.56
0299054
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
2001-03-15
4,853.65
0299055
PARKS RENTAL INC
2001-03-15
53,90
0299056
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
2001-03-15
406,39
0299057
PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE
2001-03-15
94,90
0299058
POSTMASTER
2001-03-15
38,00
0299059
PUBLIC DEFENDER
2001-03-15
1,745.33
0299060
PORT CONSOLIDATED
2001-03-15
1,257.69
0299061
PRESS JOURNAL
2001-03-15
122,00
0299062
PARRISH, JAMES L PE
2001-03-15
500,00
0299063
PINEAPPLE PRESS, INC
2001-03-15
28.05
0299064
PAGENET OF FLORIDA
2001-03-15
339,90
0299065
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE
2001-03-15
297,50
0299066
POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
2001-03-15
2,648.00
0299067
PRESS JOURNAL
2001-03-15
11950.00
0299068
PUBLIX PHARMACY
2001-03-15
42.78
0299069
PARKER, DEBBIE
2001-03-15
190,55
0299070
PING, INC
2001-03-15
1,242.44
0299071
PROSPER, JANET C
2001-03-15
392,00
0299072
PROFORMA
2001-03-15
83,70
0299073
PENWORTHY COMPANY, THE
2001-03-15
425,10
0299074
PENA, JORGE
2001-03-15
100.42
0299075
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
2001-03-15
165,98
0299076
RINGHAVER
2001-03-15
320,73
0299077
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
2001-03-15
821,25
0299078
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
2001-03-15
46,544,99
0299079
RAYNOR, JEFFREY
2001-03-15
83.20
0299080
RAM MEDIA
2001-03-15
10,079,05
0299081
RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
2001-03-15
113,975,00
0299082
0299083
0299084
0299085
0299086
0299087
0299088
0299089
0299090
0299091
0299092
0299093
RAFULS, DEBORAH
R & G SOD FARMS
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
RAYNOR, WILLIAM M & SHIRLEY
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
RAPP, PAMELA
REXEL CONSOLIDATED
REHABILICARE
ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
1,260.00
2,320,37
8,12
204,25
700.00
72,24
24,00
264.65
93,44
675,00
290,95
584,64
0299094
0299095
0299096
0299097
0299098
0299099
0299100
SOUTHARD, TERRY
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
STRUNK FUNERAL HOME
SAFESPACE INC
SEMBLER, CHARLES W
SOUTHERN HISTORICAL PRESS &
SKILLPATH SEMINARS
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2,912.59
6,60
45,00
300,00
53,60
183,50
199,00
0299101
0299102
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
SUPERIOR PRINTING
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
53,10
482.25
April 3, 2001
m
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299047
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
2001-03-15
152.79
0299048
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
2001-03-15
34,036.67
0299049
NATOA
2001-03-15
345.00
0299050
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
2001-03-15
316.09
0299051
NATIONAL PHILATELIC CENTRE
2001-03-15
1.98
0299052
NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES
2001-03-15
21467.11
0299053
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
2001-03-15
3,226.56
0299054
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
2001-03-15
4,853.65
0299055
PARKS RENTAL INC
2001-03-15
53,90
0299056
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
2001-03-15
406,39
0299057
PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE
2001-03-15
94,90
0299058
POSTMASTER
2001-03-15
38,00
0299059
PUBLIC DEFENDER
2001-03-15
1,745.33
0299060
PORT CONSOLIDATED
2001-03-15
1,257.69
0299061
PRESS JOURNAL
2001-03-15
122,00
0299062
PARRISH, JAMES L PE
2001-03-15
500,00
0299063
PINEAPPLE PRESS, INC
2001-03-15
28.05
0299064
PAGENET OF FLORIDA
2001-03-15
339,90
0299065
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE
2001-03-15
297,50
0299066
POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
2001-03-15
2,648.00
0299067
PRESS JOURNAL
2001-03-15
11950.00
0299068
PUBLIX PHARMACY
2001-03-15
42.78
0299069
PARKER, DEBBIE
2001-03-15
190,55
0299070
PING, INC
2001-03-15
1,242.44
0299071
PROSPER, JANET C
2001-03-15
392,00
0299072
PROFORMA
2001-03-15
83,70
0299073
PENWORTHY COMPANY, THE
2001-03-15
425,10
0299074
PENA, JORGE
2001-03-15
100.42
0299075
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
2001-03-15
165,98
0299076
RINGHAVER
2001-03-15
320,73
0299077
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
2001-03-15
821,25
0299078
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
2001-03-15
46,544,99
0299079
RAYNOR, JEFFREY
2001-03-15
83.20
0299080
RAM MEDIA
2001-03-15
10,079,05
0299081
RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
2001-03-15
113,975,00
0299082
0299083
0299084
0299085
0299086
0299087
0299088
0299089
0299090
0299091
0299092
0299093
RAFULS, DEBORAH
R & G SOD FARMS
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
RAYNOR, WILLIAM M & SHIRLEY
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
RAPP, PAMELA
REXEL CONSOLIDATED
REHABILICARE
ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
1,260.00
2,320,37
8,12
204,25
700.00
72,24
24,00
264.65
93,44
675,00
290,95
584,64
0299094
0299095
0299096
0299097
0299098
0299099
0299100
SOUTHARD, TERRY
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
STRUNK FUNERAL HOME
SAFESPACE INC
SEMBLER, CHARLES W
SOUTHERN HISTORICAL PRESS &
SKILLPATH SEMINARS
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2,912.59
6,60
45,00
300,00
53,60
183,50
199,00
0299101
0299102
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
SUPERIOR PRINTING
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
53,10
482.25
April 3, 2001
m
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299047
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
2001-03-15
152.79
0299048
NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE
2001-03-15
34,036.67
0299049
NATOA
2001-03-15
345.00
0299050
NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
2001-03-15
316.09
0299051
NATIONAL PHILATELIC CENTRE
2001-03-15
1.98
0299052
NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES
2001-03-15
21467.11
0299053
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
2001-03-15
3,226.56
0299054
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
2001-03-15
4,853.65
0299055
PARKS RENTAL INC
2001-03-15
53,90
0299056
PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
2001-03-15
406,39
0299057
PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE
2001-03-15
94,90
0299058
POSTMASTER
2001-03-15
38,00
0299059
PUBLIC DEFENDER
2001-03-15
1,745.33
0299060
PORT CONSOLIDATED
2001-03-15
1,257.69
0299061
PRESS JOURNAL
2001-03-15
122,00
0299062
PARRISH, JAMES L PE
2001-03-15
500,00
0299063
PINEAPPLE PRESS, INC
2001-03-15
28.05
0299064
PAGENET OF FLORIDA
2001-03-15
339,90
0299065
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE
2001-03-15
297,50
0299066
POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES
2001-03-15
2,648.00
0299067
PRESS JOURNAL
2001-03-15
11950.00
0299068
PUBLIX PHARMACY
2001-03-15
42.78
0299069
PARKER, DEBBIE
2001-03-15
190,55
0299070
PING, INC
2001-03-15
1,242.44
0299071
PROSPER, JANET C
2001-03-15
392,00
0299072
PROFORMA
2001-03-15
83,70
0299073
PENWORTHY COMPANY, THE
2001-03-15
425,10
0299074
PENA, JORGE
2001-03-15
100.42
0299075
QUALITY BOOKS, INC
2001-03-15
165,98
0299076
RINGHAVER
2001-03-15
320,73
0299077
RUSSELL CONCRETE, INC
2001-03-15
821,25
0299078
ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
2001-03-15
46,544,99
0299079
RAYNOR, JEFFREY
2001-03-15
83.20
0299080
RAM MEDIA
2001-03-15
10,079,05
0299081
RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND, INC
2001-03-15
113,975,00
0299082
0299083
0299084
0299085
0299086
0299087
0299088
0299089
0299090
0299091
0299092
0299093
RAFULS, DEBORAH
R & G SOD FARMS
RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
RAYNOR, WILLIAM M & SHIRLEY
ROYAL CUP COFFEE
RAPP, PAMELA
REXEL CONSOLIDATED
REHABILICARE
ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL
SAFETY KLEEN CORP
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
1,260.00
2,320,37
8,12
204,25
700.00
72,24
24,00
264.65
93,44
675,00
290,95
584,64
0299094
0299095
0299096
0299097
0299098
0299099
0299100
SOUTHARD, TERRY
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
STRUNK FUNERAL HOME
SAFESPACE INC
SEMBLER, CHARLES W
SOUTHERN HISTORICAL PRESS &
SKILLPATH SEMINARS
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2,912.59
6,60
45,00
300,00
53,60
183,50
199,00
0299101
0299102
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
SUPERIOR PRINTING
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
53,10
482.25
April 3, 2001
m
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299103
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
2001-03-15
691.24
0299104
SNOBERGER, RUTH ANN
2001-03-15
189.93
0299105
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2001-03-15
25.00
0299106
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2001-03-15
1,-013.00
0299107
SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
2001-03-15
212.35
0299108
STAGE & SCREEN
2001-03-15
36.99
0299109
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
2001-03-15
4,085.75
0299110
SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
2001-03-15
136.00
0299111
SPHERION CORPORATION
2001-03-15
1,224.00
0299112
SUNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC
2001-03-15
772.46
0299113
SIMPKINS, GWENDOLYN & BRIAN
2001-03-15
500.00
0299114
0299115
SPEIRS, DONNA
SAM MICKLER LIBRARY SERVICES
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
49.00
818.00
0299116
0299117
0299118
0299119
0299120-
0299121
0299122
0299123
0299124
0299125
0299126
0299127
SUNTREE PARTNERS, THE
SMITH, BRUCE
R E STEELE PAINTING
TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS, INC
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
SMITH, TERRY L
TARGET STORE
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
TRAPP, STEVEN E.
TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
10,765.00
500.00
4,900.00
31468.73
40,927.99
127,602.11
993.00
45.88
40.77
11697.64
500.00
106.16
0299128
0299129
0299130
0299131
0299132
0299133
0299134
0299135
0299136
0299137
0299138
0299139
0299140
0299141
ULI-THE URBAN LAND INST
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
VISION VIDEO
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
WRAY, JUDY
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
75.95
640.90
61898.18
4,023.00
23.80
60,268.17
135.23
29.40
383.03
125.00
1,370.36
174.34
8.12
79.88
0299142
0299143
0299144
0299145
0299146
0299147
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
WOODS & POOLE ECONOMICS, INC
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WIDMAN, RAMONA
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
144.10
199.50
130.00
8.12
144.00
146.50
0299148
WILSON, MARGARET F
2001-03-15
118.90
0299149
0299150
0299151
0299152
0299153
0299154
0299155
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
WAL-MART STORES, INC
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WYNDHAM WESTSHORE
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
WALGREEN CO
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
316.74
1,631.50
104.00
87,799.40
315.00
107.57
106.24
0299156
W W GRAINGER INC
2001-03-15
411.70
0299157
WILSON, STEVEN
2001-03-15
25.75
0299158
WILLIAMS, LARRY ANTHONY
2001-03-15
80.00
0299159
0299160
0299161
0299162
0299163
WESTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
XEROX CORPORATION
XEROX CORPORATION
VISTA IV
THOMAS, JAMES SR
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
7,970.23
823.52
251.18
500.00
873.10
April 3, 2001
098
10
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299103
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
2001-03-15
691.24
0299104
SNOBERGER, RUTH ANN
2001-03-15
189.93
0299105
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2001-03-15
25.00
0299106
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2001-03-15
1,-013.00
0299107
SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
2001-03-15
212.35
0299108
STAGE & SCREEN
2001-03-15
36.99
0299109
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
2001-03-15
4,085.75
0299110
SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
2001-03-15
136.00
0299111
SPHERION CORPORATION
2001-03-15
1,224.00
0299112
SUNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC
2001-03-15
772.46
0299113
SIMPKINS, GWENDOLYN & BRIAN
2001-03-15
500.00
0299114
0299115
SPEIRS, DONNA
SAM MICKLER LIBRARY SERVICES
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
49.00
818.00
0299116
0299117
0299118
0299119
0299120-
0299121
0299122
0299123
0299124
0299125
0299126
0299127
SUNTREE PARTNERS, THE
SMITH, BRUCE
R E STEELE PAINTING
TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS, INC
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
SMITH, TERRY L
TARGET STORE
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
TRAPP, STEVEN E.
TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
10,765.00
500.00
4,900.00
31468.73
40,927.99
127,602.11
993.00
45.88
40.77
11697.64
500.00
106.16
0299128
0299129
0299130
0299131
0299132
0299133
0299134
0299135
0299136
0299137
0299138
0299139
0299140
0299141
ULI-THE URBAN LAND INST
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
VISION VIDEO
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
WRAY, JUDY
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
75.95
640.90
61898.18
4,023.00
23.80
60,268.17
135.23
29.40
383.03
125.00
1,370.36
174.34
8.12
79.88
0299142
0299143
0299144
0299145
0299146
0299147
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
WOODS & POOLE ECONOMICS, INC
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WIDMAN, RAMONA
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
144.10
199.50
130.00
8.12
144.00
146.50
0299148
WILSON, MARGARET F
2001-03-15
118.90
0299149
0299150
0299151
0299152
0299153
0299154
0299155
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
WAL-MART STORES, INC
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WYNDHAM WESTSHORE
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
WALGREEN CO
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
316.74
1,631.50
104.00
87,799.40
315.00
107.57
106.24
0299156
W W GRAINGER INC
2001-03-15
411.70
0299157
WILSON, STEVEN
2001-03-15
25.75
0299158
WILLIAMS, LARRY ANTHONY
2001-03-15
80.00
0299159
0299160
0299161
0299162
0299163
WESTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
XEROX CORPORATION
XEROX CORPORATION
VISTA IV
THOMAS, JAMES SR
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
7,970.23
823.52
251.18
500.00
873.10
April 3, 2001
098
10
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299103
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF
2001-03-15
691.24
0299104
SNOBERGER, RUTH ANN
2001-03-15
189.93
0299105
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2001-03-15
25.00
0299106
SOUTHERN SECURITY SYSTEMS OF
2001-03-15
1,-013.00
0299107
SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
2001-03-15
212.35
0299108
STAGE & SCREEN
2001-03-15
36.99
0299109
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
2001-03-15
4,085.75
0299110
SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
2001-03-15
136.00
0299111
SPHERION CORPORATION
2001-03-15
1,224.00
0299112
SUNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC
2001-03-15
772.46
0299113
SIMPKINS, GWENDOLYN & BRIAN
2001-03-15
500.00
0299114
0299115
SPEIRS, DONNA
SAM MICKLER LIBRARY SERVICES
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
49.00
818.00
0299116
0299117
0299118
0299119
0299120-
0299121
0299122
0299123
0299124
0299125
0299126
0299127
SUNTREE PARTNERS, THE
SMITH, BRUCE
R E STEELE PAINTING
TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS, INC
TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP
TREASURE COAST CONTRACTING,INC
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
SMITH, TERRY L
TARGET STORE
TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS
TRAPP, STEVEN E.
TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
10,765.00
500.00
4,900.00
31468.73
40,927.99
127,602.11
993.00
45.88
40.77
11697.64
500.00
106.16
0299128
0299129
0299130
0299131
0299132
0299133
0299134
0299135
0299136
0299137
0299138
0299139
0299140
0299141
ULI-THE URBAN LAND INST
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
VISION VIDEO
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
WRAY, JUDY
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
75.95
640.90
61898.18
4,023.00
23.80
60,268.17
135.23
29.40
383.03
125.00
1,370.36
174.34
8.12
79.88
0299142
0299143
0299144
0299145
0299146
0299147
WAL-MART PHARMACY, INC
WOODS & POOLE ECONOMICS, INC
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WIDMAN, RAMONA
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WATERWORKS CAR WASH
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
144.10
199.50
130.00
8.12
144.00
146.50
0299148
WILSON, MARGARET F
2001-03-15
118.90
0299149
0299150
0299151
0299152
0299153
0299154
0299155
WALGREENS PHARMACY #4642
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
WAL-MART STORES, INC
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WYNDHAM WESTSHORE
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
WALGREEN CO
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
316.74
1,631.50
104.00
87,799.40
315.00
107.57
106.24
0299156
W W GRAINGER INC
2001-03-15
411.70
0299157
WILSON, STEVEN
2001-03-15
25.75
0299158
WILLIAMS, LARRY ANTHONY
2001-03-15
80.00
0299159
0299160
0299161
0299162
0299163
WESTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
XEROX CORPORATION
XEROX CORPORATION
VISTA IV
THOMAS, JAMES SR
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
7,970.23
823.52
251.18
500.00
873.10
April 3, 2001
098
10
April 3, 2001
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299164
MILLER, JOSEPH
2001-03-15
888.78
0299165
0299166
WODTKE, RUSSELL
MERCURI, DEBRA
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
591.94
243.07
0299167
ROYAL, THOMAS
2001-03-15
582.98
0299168
CANVAS SHOP INC, THE
2001-03-15
23.41
0299169
GRABHER, KURT AND
2001-03-15
122.56
0299170
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
2001-03-15
46.73
0299171
PARMAN, HENRY
2001-03-15
85.64
0299172
ZUGELTER CONSTRUCTION CORP
2001-03-15
192.17
0299173
HALLDEN, KENNETH E
2001-03-15
48.98
0299174
LAPHAM, ADELE C
2001-03-15
26.55
0299175
CENTURY 21 SEA TREK
2001-03-15
38.57
0299176
STUCKEY, JACQUELINE
2001-03-15
93.13
0299177
KOENIGSMANN, ROBERT
2001-03-15
68.06
0299178
DRIGGERS, DEBORAH
2001-03-15
37.07
0299179
CARVER, ARTHUR AND
2001-03-15
90.55
0299180
SHUREN, RETINA
2001-03-15
43.89
0299181
ACKER HALL INSURANCE
2001-03-15
117.52
0299182
MATAKAETIS, MARK AND
2001-03-15
23.81
0299183
BAGMAKERS FACTORY OUTLET INC
2001-03-15
95.68
0299184
GHO VERO BEACH INC
2001-03-15
86.54
0299185
RUMSEY, PENNY
2001-03-15
5.39
0299186
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
2001-03-15
29.54
0299187
INDIAN RIVER MALL
2001-03-15
118.26
0299188
LARRICK, HAPPY
2001-03-15
111.87
0299189
FLORES, REBECCA
2001-03-15
24.67
0299190
RUSSO, MARY L
2001-03-15
39.61
0299191
COLE, KATHY
2001-03-15
98.12
0299192
DELACRUZ, FRED
2001-03-15
19.15
0299193
CRUMER, KELLY
2001-03-15
36.97
0299194
THOMAS, ALAN AND
2001-03-15
78.14
0299195
KANTER, CRAIG AND
2001-03-15
100.65
0299196
KUHN, TRACY
2001-03-15
10.95
0299197
0299198
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION INC
MC NEW, TORRESSIA
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
152.69
51.31
0299199
CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES
2001-03-15
38.63
0299200
STREET, KIM
2001-03-15
32.28
0299201
0299202
0299203
STANTON, STEPHEN L
REED, TOBIN J
PALM LAKE CLUB, THE
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
66.88
76.23
614.40
0299204
0299205
BUSCAGLIA, CHRIS
BLOUNT, SCOTT K
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
17.80
21.58
0299206
ZHENG, DE SHENG
2001-03-15
42.96
0299207
CHILBERG, BARBARA J
2001-03-15
10.92
0299208
CARDOSA, BERTIN
2001-03-15
1.03
0299209
MONTGOMERY, JOHN L JR
2001-03-15
51.97
11
1,831,875.02
l 10G 6 9 9
April 3, 2001
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299164
MILLER, JOSEPH
2001-03-15
888.78
0299165
0299166
WODTKE, RUSSELL
MERCURI, DEBRA
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
591.94
243.07
0299167
ROYAL, THOMAS
2001-03-15
582.98
0299168
CANVAS SHOP INC, THE
2001-03-15
23.41
0299169
GRABHER, KURT AND
2001-03-15
122.56
0299170
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
2001-03-15
46.73
0299171
PARMAN, HENRY
2001-03-15
85.64
0299172
ZUGELTER CONSTRUCTION CORP
2001-03-15
192.17
0299173
HALLDEN, KENNETH E
2001-03-15
48.98
0299174
LAPHAM, ADELE C
2001-03-15
26.55
0299175
CENTURY 21 SEA TREK
2001-03-15
38.57
0299176
STUCKEY, JACQUELINE
2001-03-15
93.13
0299177
KOENIGSMANN, ROBERT
2001-03-15
68.06
0299178
DRIGGERS, DEBORAH
2001-03-15
37.07
0299179
CARVER, ARTHUR AND
2001-03-15
90.55
0299180
SHUREN, RETINA
2001-03-15
43.89
0299181
ACKER HALL INSURANCE
2001-03-15
117.52
0299182
MATAKAETIS, MARK AND
2001-03-15
23.81
0299183
BAGMAKERS FACTORY OUTLET INC
2001-03-15
95.68
0299184
GHO VERO BEACH INC
2001-03-15
86.54
0299185
RUMSEY, PENNY
2001-03-15
5.39
0299186
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
2001-03-15
29.54
0299187
INDIAN RIVER MALL
2001-03-15
118.26
0299188
LARRICK, HAPPY
2001-03-15
111.87
0299189
FLORES, REBECCA
2001-03-15
24.67
0299190
RUSSO, MARY L
2001-03-15
39.61
0299191
COLE, KATHY
2001-03-15
98.12
0299192
DELACRUZ, FRED
2001-03-15
19.15
0299193
CRUMER, KELLY
2001-03-15
36.97
0299194
THOMAS, ALAN AND
2001-03-15
78.14
0299195
KANTER, CRAIG AND
2001-03-15
100.65
0299196
KUHN, TRACY
2001-03-15
10.95
0299197
0299198
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION INC
MC NEW, TORRESSIA
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
152.69
51.31
0299199
CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES
2001-03-15
38.63
0299200
STREET, KIM
2001-03-15
32.28
0299201
0299202
0299203
STANTON, STEPHEN L
REED, TOBIN J
PALM LAKE CLUB, THE
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
66.88
76.23
614.40
0299204
0299205
BUSCAGLIA, CHRIS
BLOUNT, SCOTT K
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
17.80
21.58
0299206
ZHENG, DE SHENG
2001-03-15
42.96
0299207
CHILBERG, BARBARA J
2001-03-15
10.92
0299208
CARDOSA, BERTIN
2001-03-15
1.03
0299209
MONTGOMERY, JOHN L JR
2001-03-15
51.97
11
1,831,875.02
l 10G 6 9 9
April 3, 2001
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0299164
MILLER, JOSEPH
2001-03-15
888.78
0299165
0299166
WODTKE, RUSSELL
MERCURI, DEBRA
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
591.94
243.07
0299167
ROYAL, THOMAS
2001-03-15
582.98
0299168
CANVAS SHOP INC, THE
2001-03-15
23.41
0299169
GRABHER, KURT AND
2001-03-15
122.56
0299170
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
2001-03-15
46.73
0299171
PARMAN, HENRY
2001-03-15
85.64
0299172
ZUGELTER CONSTRUCTION CORP
2001-03-15
192.17
0299173
HALLDEN, KENNETH E
2001-03-15
48.98
0299174
LAPHAM, ADELE C
2001-03-15
26.55
0299175
CENTURY 21 SEA TREK
2001-03-15
38.57
0299176
STUCKEY, JACQUELINE
2001-03-15
93.13
0299177
KOENIGSMANN, ROBERT
2001-03-15
68.06
0299178
DRIGGERS, DEBORAH
2001-03-15
37.07
0299179
CARVER, ARTHUR AND
2001-03-15
90.55
0299180
SHUREN, RETINA
2001-03-15
43.89
0299181
ACKER HALL INSURANCE
2001-03-15
117.52
0299182
MATAKAETIS, MARK AND
2001-03-15
23.81
0299183
BAGMAKERS FACTORY OUTLET INC
2001-03-15
95.68
0299184
GHO VERO BEACH INC
2001-03-15
86.54
0299185
RUMSEY, PENNY
2001-03-15
5.39
0299186
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
2001-03-15
29.54
0299187
INDIAN RIVER MALL
2001-03-15
118.26
0299188
LARRICK, HAPPY
2001-03-15
111.87
0299189
FLORES, REBECCA
2001-03-15
24.67
0299190
RUSSO, MARY L
2001-03-15
39.61
0299191
COLE, KATHY
2001-03-15
98.12
0299192
DELACRUZ, FRED
2001-03-15
19.15
0299193
CRUMER, KELLY
2001-03-15
36.97
0299194
THOMAS, ALAN AND
2001-03-15
78.14
0299195
KANTER, CRAIG AND
2001-03-15
100.65
0299196
KUHN, TRACY
2001-03-15
10.95
0299197
0299198
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION INC
MC NEW, TORRESSIA
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
152.69
51.31
0299199
CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES
2001-03-15
38.63
0299200
STREET, KIM
2001-03-15
32.28
0299201
0299202
0299203
STANTON, STEPHEN L
REED, TOBIN J
PALM LAKE CLUB, THE
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
66.88
76.23
614.40
0299204
0299205
BUSCAGLIA, CHRIS
BLOUNT, SCOTT K
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
17.80
21.58
0299206
ZHENG, DE SHENG
2001-03-15
42.96
0299207
CHILBERG, BARBARA J
2001-03-15
10.92
0299208
CARDOSA, BERTIN
2001-03-15
1.03
0299209
MONTGOMERY, JOHN L JR
2001-03-15
51.97
11
1,831,875.02
l 10G 6 9 9
7.0 Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers forAttaining the Rank
of Eagle Scout
CONSENT
HONORING GREGORY SHIVERS
FOR ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2000, Gregory Shivers, age 17, attained the rank of Eagle
Scout, the highest rank in the Boy Scouts of America. Greg earned 28 merit badges, all 6
required ranks, and completed his Eagle Scout service project to qualify for his rank of Eagle;
and
WHEREAS, The
Boy Scouts
of America statistics
reveal that fewer than
3% of all boys who
enroll in Scouts ever
achieve the
rank of Eagle Scout;
and
Leader
WHEREAS, Greg has been in Scouts since age 8 and has always been a member of Boy
Scout Troop 598, sponsored by the Grace United Methodist Church in Wabasso, Indian River
County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, while
in
Scouts. Greg
served
as a
member of the Order of the Arrow, and
maintained the position
of
Senior Patrol
Leader
in the
troop; and
WHEREAS,
besides
his involvement in scouting, Greg was a member
of his high
school
band playing percussion,
bassoon and clarinet. He was an active member of the
Health
Occupations Students of
America (HOSA) at Sebastian River High School;
a Summer
Camp
Counselor at the
Environmental Learning Center and an active participant in
his school's Teen
Court Program.
While in
high school, Greg also completed several college
courses at
Indian
River Community
College
through the dual enrollment program
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT
PROCLAIMED BY
THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN
RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
that the Board recognizes the
accomplishments of Gregory
Shivers,
and honors him for his
achievement.
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LOP -Me IT -P
7.D. Designation of Liaison to the St Johns River Wa
Management District (SJRWMD) - Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbri
The Board reviewed a memo of March 27, 2001:
April 3, 2001
{ i FG 700
12
7.0 Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers forAttaining the Rank
of Eagle Scout
CONSENT
HONORING GREGORY SHIVERS
FOR ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2000, Gregory Shivers, age 17, attained the rank of Eagle
Scout, the highest rank in the Boy Scouts of America. Greg earned 28 merit badges, all 6
required ranks, and completed his Eagle Scout service project to qualify for his rank of Eagle;
and
WHEREAS, The
Boy Scouts
of America statistics
reveal that fewer than
3% of all boys who
enroll in Scouts ever
achieve the
rank of Eagle Scout;
and
Leader
WHEREAS, Greg has been in Scouts since age 8 and has always been a member of Boy
Scout Troop 598, sponsored by the Grace United Methodist Church in Wabasso, Indian River
County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, while
in
Scouts. Greg
served
as a
member of the Order of the Arrow, and
maintained the position
of
Senior Patrol
Leader
in the
troop; and
WHEREAS,
besides
his involvement in scouting, Greg was a member
of his high
school
band playing percussion,
bassoon and clarinet. He was an active member of the
Health
Occupations Students of
America (HOSA) at Sebastian River High School;
a Summer
Camp
Counselor at the
Environmental Learning Center and an active participant in
his school's Teen
Court Program.
While in
high school, Greg also completed several college
courses at
Indian
River Community
College
through the dual enrollment program
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT
PROCLAIMED BY
THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN
RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
that the Board recognizes the
accomplishments of Gregory
Shivers,
and honors him for his
achievement.
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LOP -Me IT -P
7.D. Designation of Liaison to the St Johns River Wa
Management District (SJRWMD) - Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbri
The Board reviewed a memo of March 27, 2001:
April 3, 2001
{ i FG 700
12
7.0 Proclamation Honoring Gregory Shivers forAttaining the Rank
of Eagle Scout
CONSENT
HONORING GREGORY SHIVERS
FOR ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2000, Gregory Shivers, age 17, attained the rank of Eagle
Scout, the highest rank in the Boy Scouts of America. Greg earned 28 merit badges, all 6
required ranks, and completed his Eagle Scout service project to qualify for his rank of Eagle;
and
WHEREAS, The
Boy Scouts
of America statistics
reveal that fewer than
3% of all boys who
enroll in Scouts ever
achieve the
rank of Eagle Scout;
and
Leader
WHEREAS, Greg has been in Scouts since age 8 and has always been a member of Boy
Scout Troop 598, sponsored by the Grace United Methodist Church in Wabasso, Indian River
County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, while
in
Scouts. Greg
served
as a
member of the Order of the Arrow, and
maintained the position
of
Senior Patrol
Leader
in the
troop; and
WHEREAS,
besides
his involvement in scouting, Greg was a member
of his high
school
band playing percussion,
bassoon and clarinet. He was an active member of the
Health
Occupations Students of
America (HOSA) at Sebastian River High School;
a Summer
Camp
Counselor at the
Environmental Learning Center and an active participant in
his school's Teen
Court Program.
While in
high school, Greg also completed several college
courses at
Indian
River Community
College
through the dual enrollment program
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT
PROCLAIMED BY
THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN
RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
that the Board recognizes the
accomplishments of Gregory
Shivers,
and honors him for his
achievement.
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LOP -Me IT -P
7.D. Designation of Liaison to the St Johns River Wa
Management District (SJRWMD) - Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbri
The Board reviewed a memo of March 27, 2001:
April 3, 2001
{ i FG 700
12
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: March 27, 2001
Subject: Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD)
From: Commissioner Caroline Ginn
Chairman
St. Johns River Water Management has requested the the Board appoint a Commissioner to serve
as a liaison to the SJRWMD. I would like to recommend that Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
serve as Indian River County's appoinment.
Attachment — Letter dated March 27, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously appointed Vice
Chairman Stanbridge to serve as Indian River County's
representative to St. Johns River Water Management District, as
recommended in the memorandum.
7.E.
Rgport.for FY 1999-2000
II
The Board reviewed a memorandum of March 26, 2001:
TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 26, 2001
SUBJECT: ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR CIC
Section 218.32, Florida Statutes, requires that each unit of local government submit a financial report
covering its operations during the previous fiscal year. The report must be submitted within 45 days
after the completion of the audit report, but no later than 12 months after the end of the fiscal year.
April 3, 2001
13
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: March 27, 2001
Subject: Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD)
From: Commissioner Caroline Ginn
Chairman
St. Johns River Water Management has requested the the Board appoint a Commissioner to serve
as a liaison to the SJRWMD. I would like to recommend that Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
serve as Indian River County's appoinment.
Attachment — Letter dated March 27, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously appointed Vice
Chairman Stanbridge to serve as Indian River County's
representative to St. Johns River Water Management District, as
recommended in the memorandum.
7.E.
Rgport.for FY 1999-2000
II
The Board reviewed a memorandum of March 26, 2001:
TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 26, 2001
SUBJECT: ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR CIC
Section 218.32, Florida Statutes, requires that each unit of local government submit a financial report
covering its operations during the previous fiscal year. The report must be submitted within 45 days
after the completion of the audit report, but no later than 12 months after the end of the fiscal year.
April 3, 2001
13
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: March 27, 2001
Subject: Designation of Liaison to the St. Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD)
From: Commissioner Caroline Ginn
Chairman
St. Johns River Water Management has requested the the Board appoint a Commissioner to serve
as a liaison to the SJRWMD. I would like to recommend that Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge
serve as Indian River County's appoinment.
Attachment — Letter dated March 27, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously appointed Vice
Chairman Stanbridge to serve as Indian River County's
representative to St. Johns River Water Management District, as
recommended in the memorandum.
7.E.
Rgport.for FY 1999-2000
II
The Board reviewed a memorandum of March 26, 2001:
TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
DATE: MARCH 26, 2001
SUBJECT: ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR CIC
Section 218.32, Florida Statutes, requires that each unit of local government submit a financial report
covering its operations during the previous fiscal year. The report must be submitted within 45 days
after the completion of the audit report, but no later than 12 months after the end of the fiscal year.
April 3, 2001
13
The Indian River County Annual Local Government Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999 - 2000
has been prepared and is ready to be submitted to the Department of Banking and_ Finance in
Tallahassee. The report is to be signed by the Chief Financial Officer and the Chairman of the Board
of County Commissioners.
I respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the
County's Annual Local Government Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999 - 2000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to sign the County's Annual Local Government
Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999-2000, as requested in
the memorandum.
COPY OF REPORT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. F. Donation ofSurnlus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital.
Inc.
Acting Director Department of Emergency Services Nathan McCollum reviewed a
memorandum of March 21, 2001:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Nathan McCollum, Acting Director
Department of Emergency Services '
DATE: March 21, 2001
SUBJECT: Donation of Surplus Vehicle To Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc.
On December 4, 2000, Mr. Roger Walker, Diagnostic Services Manager with Indian River Memorial Hospital
Inc. contacted our office to inquire about surplus plans for old law enforcement vehicles used by our
department. Specifically, Mr. Walker was interested in a 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria (VIN
#2FABP72FOJX151458) which is scheduled for surplus in March. The hospital will use this vehicle to
April 3, 2001
HE
The Indian River County Annual Local Government Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999 - 2000
has been prepared and is ready to be submitted to the Department of Banking and_ Finance in
Tallahassee. The report is to be signed by the Chief Financial Officer and the Chairman of the Board
of County Commissioners.
I respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the
County's Annual Local Government Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999 - 2000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to sign the County's Annual Local Government
Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999-2000, as requested in
the memorandum.
COPY OF REPORT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. F. Donation ofSurnlus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital.
Inc.
Acting Director Department of Emergency Services Nathan McCollum reviewed a
memorandum of March 21, 2001:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Nathan McCollum, Acting Director
Department of Emergency Services '
DATE: March 21, 2001
SUBJECT: Donation of Surplus Vehicle To Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc.
On December 4, 2000, Mr. Roger Walker, Diagnostic Services Manager with Indian River Memorial Hospital
Inc. contacted our office to inquire about surplus plans for old law enforcement vehicles used by our
department. Specifically, Mr. Walker was interested in a 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria (VIN
#2FABP72FOJX151458) which is scheduled for surplus in March. The hospital will use this vehicle to
April 3, 2001
HE
The Indian River County Annual Local Government Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999 - 2000
has been prepared and is ready to be submitted to the Department of Banking and_ Finance in
Tallahassee. The report is to be signed by the Chief Financial Officer and the Chairman of the Board
of County Commissioners.
I respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign the
County's Annual Local Government Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999 - 2000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to sign the County's Annual Local Government
Financial Report for the fiscal year 1999-2000, as requested in
the memorandum.
COPY OF REPORT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. F. Donation ofSurnlus Vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital.
Inc.
Acting Director Department of Emergency Services Nathan McCollum reviewed a
memorandum of March 21, 2001:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Nathan McCollum, Acting Director
Department of Emergency Services '
DATE: March 21, 2001
SUBJECT: Donation of Surplus Vehicle To Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc.
On December 4, 2000, Mr. Roger Walker, Diagnostic Services Manager with Indian River Memorial Hospital
Inc. contacted our office to inquire about surplus plans for old law enforcement vehicles used by our
department. Specifically, Mr. Walker was interested in a 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria (VIN
#2FABP72FOJX151458) which is scheduled for surplus in March. The hospital will use this vehicle to
April 3, 2001
HE
transport patients who would require the additional security features afforded this former law enforcement
vehicle.
In 1996, this vehicle was obtained from the Sheriff's Office, as surplus, for use by the EMS Division. The
vehicle mileage is 124,568 and is no longer reliable for day to day use because of the repair work needed.
Emergency Services is not authorizing any further repairs for this vehicle and it has been removed from
operation. The hospital is aware of the condition of the vehicle and the repairs that will be needed in the near
future. The hospital has agreed to pay all fees including, title transfer, insurance, etc., associated with this
vehicle donation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends surplus of the 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria, VIN 42FABP72FOJX151458, Asset #1655,
Fleet #744. Staff further recommends the transfer of this surplus vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital
Inc. at no cost.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter From Roger Walker
In response to Commissioner Adams, Acting Director McCollum explained that Mr,
Walker at Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc. is completely aware of the repairs needed
to make the vehicle safe; the repair work will be done by them. He explained that this
vehicle is equipped with steel -backed front seats to protect the driver and front passenger in
case the patient in the back seat becomes physically combative.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously declared surplus
the 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria, VIN
#2FABP72FOJX151458, Asset 91655, Fleet 9744, and
authorized the transfer of the surplus vehicle to Indian River
Memorial Hospital, Inc. at no cost, as recommended in the
Memorandum,
April 3, 2001
15
transport patients who would require the additional security features afforded this former law enforcement
vehicle.
In 1996, this vehicle was obtained from the Sheriff's Office, as surplus, for use by the EMS Division. The
vehicle mileage is 124,568 and is no longer reliable for day to day use because of the repair work needed.
Emergency Services is not authorizing any further repairs for this vehicle and it has been removed from
operation. The hospital is aware of the condition of the vehicle and the repairs that will be needed in the near
future. The hospital has agreed to pay all fees including, title transfer, insurance, etc., associated with this
vehicle donation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends surplus of the 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria, VIN 42FABP72FOJX151458, Asset #1655,
Fleet #744. Staff further recommends the transfer of this surplus vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital
Inc. at no cost.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter From Roger Walker
In response to Commissioner Adams, Acting Director McCollum explained that Mr,
Walker at Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc. is completely aware of the repairs needed
to make the vehicle safe; the repair work will be done by them. He explained that this
vehicle is equipped with steel -backed front seats to protect the driver and front passenger in
case the patient in the back seat becomes physically combative.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously declared surplus
the 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria, VIN
#2FABP72FOJX151458, Asset 91655, Fleet 9744, and
authorized the transfer of the surplus vehicle to Indian River
Memorial Hospital, Inc. at no cost, as recommended in the
Memorandum,
April 3, 2001
15
transport patients who would require the additional security features afforded this former law enforcement
vehicle.
In 1996, this vehicle was obtained from the Sheriff's Office, as surplus, for use by the EMS Division. The
vehicle mileage is 124,568 and is no longer reliable for day to day use because of the repair work needed.
Emergency Services is not authorizing any further repairs for this vehicle and it has been removed from
operation. The hospital is aware of the condition of the vehicle and the repairs that will be needed in the near
future. The hospital has agreed to pay all fees including, title transfer, insurance, etc., associated with this
vehicle donation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends surplus of the 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria, VIN 42FABP72FOJX151458, Asset #1655,
Fleet #744. Staff further recommends the transfer of this surplus vehicle to Indian River Memorial Hospital
Inc. at no cost.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter From Roger Walker
In response to Commissioner Adams, Acting Director McCollum explained that Mr,
Walker at Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc. is completely aware of the repairs needed
to make the vehicle safe; the repair work will be done by them. He explained that this
vehicle is equipped with steel -backed front seats to protect the driver and front passenger in
case the patient in the back seat becomes physically combative.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously declared surplus
the 1988 Ford LTD Crown Victoria, VIN
#2FABP72FOJX151458, Asset 91655, Fleet 9744, and
authorized the transfer of the surplus vehicle to Indian River
Memorial Hospital, Inc. at no cost, as recommended in the
Memorandum,
April 3, 2001
15
7. G. Purchase and Maint
.,.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.I✓.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVI
PREPAREDAND STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E.
STAFFED BY: INTERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF U
SUBJECT: PURCHASE & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
BLACK -LINE COPIER
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
UTILITY ENGINEERING
The Department of Utilities, Engineering & GIS Division, has a blueprint copier that utilizes a liquid
based activator (ammonia) to produce a blue print. The Department in 1995 placed this machine into
service. The blueprint copier is nearing its useful service life and the Department has budgeted for its
replacement with a black -line copier in the approaching fiscal budget (see attached). Changes in
technology and the need to limit the use of liquid activator (an indoor air quality concern) lend itself to
replacing the blue print copier with a black -line non -ammonia based copier.
The proposed black line copier has the ability to reproduce engineering plans (36" x 42") onto
various types of engineering paper such as, sepia, bond, vellum or mylar. It also has the capability of
duplicating a print from either an original or a paper copy, whereas the blue print machine can only
accomplish a single task of making a blue print from an original sepia or mylar.
In addition to serving the needs of the Department on a daily basis it has the capability of converting
archived utility record drawings from sepia to mylar. Most of the record drawings generally consist of
sepia paper, which become brittle and worn over time. The proposed black -line copier can convert
(copy) the archived drawings onto a more durable paper such as mylar. Mylar is the current material of
choice for preserving record drawings.
The County's Department of Public Works previously converted to a black -line engineering copier in
June of 1995 and reportedly are satisfied with its performance. The Utilities Department has been
utilizing their copier, but this has been an inconvenience ar�d disruptive to their Staff. It is a further
inconvenience to the utility customer whom are then obligated to either wait or return to the utility office
when copies have been made available.
The Utilities Department has as approved budget of $2,100 in the 2000/2001 fiscal year for the
leasing of a copier and additionally has $1,600 slated for a maintenance contract in the same fiscal
budget.
ANALYSIS:
Two Options were considered when evaluating the replacement of the engineering copier. Option -
A is the direct purchase of the equipment while Option -B is a Municipal Lease -to -Own. Both options
April 3, 2001
16
7. G. Purchase and Maint
.,.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.I✓.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVI
PREPAREDAND STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E.
STAFFED BY: INTERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF U
SUBJECT: PURCHASE & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
BLACK -LINE COPIER
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
UTILITY ENGINEERING
The Department of Utilities, Engineering & GIS Division, has a blueprint copier that utilizes a liquid
based activator (ammonia) to produce a blue print. The Department in 1995 placed this machine into
service. The blueprint copier is nearing its useful service life and the Department has budgeted for its
replacement with a black -line copier in the approaching fiscal budget (see attached). Changes in
technology and the need to limit the use of liquid activator (an indoor air quality concern) lend itself to
replacing the blue print copier with a black -line non -ammonia based copier.
The proposed black line copier has the ability to reproduce engineering plans (36" x 42") onto
various types of engineering paper such as, sepia, bond, vellum or mylar. It also has the capability of
duplicating a print from either an original or a paper copy, whereas the blue print machine can only
accomplish a single task of making a blue print from an original sepia or mylar.
In addition to serving the needs of the Department on a daily basis it has the capability of converting
archived utility record drawings from sepia to mylar. Most of the record drawings generally consist of
sepia paper, which become brittle and worn over time. The proposed black -line copier can convert
(copy) the archived drawings onto a more durable paper such as mylar. Mylar is the current material of
choice for preserving record drawings.
The County's Department of Public Works previously converted to a black -line engineering copier in
June of 1995 and reportedly are satisfied with its performance. The Utilities Department has been
utilizing their copier, but this has been an inconvenience ar�d disruptive to their Staff. It is a further
inconvenience to the utility customer whom are then obligated to either wait or return to the utility office
when copies have been made available.
The Utilities Department has as approved budget of $2,100 in the 2000/2001 fiscal year for the
leasing of a copier and additionally has $1,600 slated for a maintenance contract in the same fiscal
budget.
ANALYSIS:
Two Options were considered when evaluating the replacement of the engineering copier. Option -
A is the direct purchase of the equipment while Option -B is a Municipal Lease -to -Own. Both options
April 3, 2001
16
7. G. Purchase and Maint
.,.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: DONALD R. HUBBS, P.I✓.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVI
PREPAREDAND STEVEN J. DOYLE, P.E.
STAFFED BY: INTERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF U
SUBJECT: PURCHASE & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
BLACK -LINE COPIER
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
UTILITY ENGINEERING
The Department of Utilities, Engineering & GIS Division, has a blueprint copier that utilizes a liquid
based activator (ammonia) to produce a blue print. The Department in 1995 placed this machine into
service. The blueprint copier is nearing its useful service life and the Department has budgeted for its
replacement with a black -line copier in the approaching fiscal budget (see attached). Changes in
technology and the need to limit the use of liquid activator (an indoor air quality concern) lend itself to
replacing the blue print copier with a black -line non -ammonia based copier.
The proposed black line copier has the ability to reproduce engineering plans (36" x 42") onto
various types of engineering paper such as, sepia, bond, vellum or mylar. It also has the capability of
duplicating a print from either an original or a paper copy, whereas the blue print machine can only
accomplish a single task of making a blue print from an original sepia or mylar.
In addition to serving the needs of the Department on a daily basis it has the capability of converting
archived utility record drawings from sepia to mylar. Most of the record drawings generally consist of
sepia paper, which become brittle and worn over time. The proposed black -line copier can convert
(copy) the archived drawings onto a more durable paper such as mylar. Mylar is the current material of
choice for preserving record drawings.
The County's Department of Public Works previously converted to a black -line engineering copier in
June of 1995 and reportedly are satisfied with its performance. The Utilities Department has been
utilizing their copier, but this has been an inconvenience ar�d disruptive to their Staff. It is a further
inconvenience to the utility customer whom are then obligated to either wait or return to the utility office
when copies have been made available.
The Utilities Department has as approved budget of $2,100 in the 2000/2001 fiscal year for the
leasing of a copier and additionally has $1,600 slated for a maintenance contract in the same fiscal
budget.
ANALYSIS:
Two Options were considered when evaluating the replacement of the engineering copier. Option -
A is the direct purchase of the equipment while Option -B is a Municipal Lease -to -Own. Both options
April 3, 2001
16
include annual maintenance costs.
OPTION — A: PURCHASE
Description I Capital Cost ($)I Remarks / Assumptions Life Cvcle Cost
E ui Lent Purchase Cost $8.885.92 Assume 5-vears 1 $8.885.92
Annual Maintenance Cost 1 $810.00 Assume 5-vears $4.050.00
Total Life Cvcle Cost I $12.935.92
OPTION —B: LEASE / OWN
Description I Lease Cost $ Remarks / Assumptions I Life Cvcle Cost
I Equipment — Purchase Cost $175.95 / month Lease term 5 -years 1 $10.557.00
Annual Maintenance Cost $810.00 Assume 5 -years $4,050.00
I Total Life Cvcle Cost $14,607.00
The Lease/Own Option will cost approximately $334.22 +i- per year ($1,671.08 over the 5 -year
term) more than the Purchase Option therefore the option of leasing is cost prohibitive. The total amount of
lease payments during the lease term will be approximately $10,557.00 as compared to the approximate
$8,885.92 lump sum purchase price.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following:
a) Approved OPTION -A for the purchase of a MITA Copier model DC -3648 in the amount of
$8,885.92 from EGP Inc.
b) Approved an Annual Maintenance Agreement in the amount of $810.00 from EGP Inc. -MITA.
c) Allow for the Surplus of the outdated Blue line copier.
d) Authorize the Director of Utilities to execute all require documents.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment -A Manufactures literature of a MITA model DC -3648 large format copier
Attachment -B Excerpt from FY 2000/2001 Budget
Attachment -C Equipment Purchase Price Quote from EGP Inc. -MITA.
ACCOUNT INFORMATION
Description Account No.
Amount
Purchase Price 471-235-536-066.47
$8.885.92
Annual Maintenance 471-235-536-066.47 $810.00 / vear
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
BY: / l
James E. Chandler, C
Administrator
Indian River Co.
ADproved
Date
Administration
i J
Utilities
N
i�' C''
Budget
LN
J
Legal
'
Risk Manager
/_I�JZ.L-tom.
F'Juliu=WK n OsthwMgrnN - Lau A.,= M for Blwkime Copia Mach 15. 2001 DRAFT vert buy doc
April 3, 2001
17
include annual maintenance costs.
OPTION — A: PURCHASE
Description I Capital Cost ($)I Remarks / Assumptions Life Cvcle Cost
E ui Lent Purchase Cost $8.885.92 Assume 5-vears 1 $8.885.92
Annual Maintenance Cost 1 $810.00 Assume 5-vears $4.050.00
Total Life Cvcle Cost I $12.935.92
OPTION —B: LEASE / OWN
Description I Lease Cost $ Remarks / Assumptions I Life Cvcle Cost
I Equipment — Purchase Cost $175.95 / month Lease term 5 -years 1 $10.557.00
Annual Maintenance Cost $810.00 Assume 5 -years $4,050.00
I Total Life Cvcle Cost $14,607.00
The Lease/Own Option will cost approximately $334.22 +i- per year ($1,671.08 over the 5 -year
term) more than the Purchase Option therefore the option of leasing is cost prohibitive. The total amount of
lease payments during the lease term will be approximately $10,557.00 as compared to the approximate
$8,885.92 lump sum purchase price.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following:
a) Approved OPTION -A for the purchase of a MITA Copier model DC -3648 in the amount of
$8,885.92 from EGP Inc.
b) Approved an Annual Maintenance Agreement in the amount of $810.00 from EGP Inc. -MITA.
c) Allow for the Surplus of the outdated Blue line copier.
d) Authorize the Director of Utilities to execute all require documents.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment -A Manufactures literature of a MITA model DC -3648 large format copier
Attachment -B Excerpt from FY 2000/2001 Budget
Attachment -C Equipment Purchase Price Quote from EGP Inc. -MITA.
ACCOUNT INFORMATION
Description Account No.
Amount
Purchase Price 471-235-536-066.47
$8.885.92
Annual Maintenance 471-235-536-066.47 $810.00 / vear
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
BY: / l
James E. Chandler, C
Administrator
Indian River Co.
ADproved
Date
Administration
i J
Utilities
N
i�' C''
Budget
LN
J
Legal
'
Risk Manager
/_I�JZ.L-tom.
F'Juliu=WK n OsthwMgrnN - Lau A.,= M for Blwkime Copia Mach 15. 2001 DRAFT vert buy doc
April 3, 2001
17
include annual maintenance costs.
OPTION — A: PURCHASE
Description I Capital Cost ($)I Remarks / Assumptions Life Cvcle Cost
E ui Lent Purchase Cost $8.885.92 Assume 5-vears 1 $8.885.92
Annual Maintenance Cost 1 $810.00 Assume 5-vears $4.050.00
Total Life Cvcle Cost I $12.935.92
OPTION —B: LEASE / OWN
Description I Lease Cost $ Remarks / Assumptions I Life Cvcle Cost
I Equipment — Purchase Cost $175.95 / month Lease term 5 -years 1 $10.557.00
Annual Maintenance Cost $810.00 Assume 5 -years $4,050.00
I Total Life Cvcle Cost $14,607.00
The Lease/Own Option will cost approximately $334.22 +i- per year ($1,671.08 over the 5 -year
term) more than the Purchase Option therefore the option of leasing is cost prohibitive. The total amount of
lease payments during the lease term will be approximately $10,557.00 as compared to the approximate
$8,885.92 lump sum purchase price.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following:
a) Approved OPTION -A for the purchase of a MITA Copier model DC -3648 in the amount of
$8,885.92 from EGP Inc.
b) Approved an Annual Maintenance Agreement in the amount of $810.00 from EGP Inc. -MITA.
c) Allow for the Surplus of the outdated Blue line copier.
d) Authorize the Director of Utilities to execute all require documents.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment -A Manufactures literature of a MITA model DC -3648 large format copier
Attachment -B Excerpt from FY 2000/2001 Budget
Attachment -C Equipment Purchase Price Quote from EGP Inc. -MITA.
ACCOUNT INFORMATION
Description Account No.
Amount
Purchase Price 471-235-536-066.47
$8.885.92
Annual Maintenance 471-235-536-066.47 $810.00 / vear
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
BY: / l
James E. Chandler, C
Administrator
Indian River Co.
ADproved
Date
Administration
i J
Utilities
N
i�' C''
Budget
LN
J
Legal
'
Risk Manager
/_I�JZ.L-tom.
F'Juliu=WK n OsthwMgrnN - Lau A.,= M for Blwkime Copia Mach 15. 2001 DRAFT vert buy doc
April 3, 2001
17
7.H. R
N
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously a) approved
Option A for the purchase of a MITA Copier, model DC -3648
in the amount of $8,885.92 from EGP, Inc., b) approved an
Annual Maintenance Agreement in the amount of $810.00 from
EGP, Inc. - MITA, c) authorized the surplus of the outdated
blue -line copier, and d) authorized the Director of Utilities to
execute all required documents, as recommended in the
memorandum.
esoluti6
ties - TI
* AittHn
Frui
VON
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
cellati,
29 thru 2001-036 -
yak L n ase
Housch (r,
Laurel B
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
To: Board of Commissioners
Through: Paul G. BaCounty Attorney
From: Lea R. Keller, CLA, Legal Assistant
Re: Recently Acquired Property = Tax Cancellation
April 3, 2001
8
i1 X06
IN
Recently Acquiree
Flopment (r/w 33rd
'w Willow Street);
r/w 58th Avenue);
PL Vero (r/w 58th
March 15, 2001
7.H. R
N
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously a) approved
Option A for the purchase of a MITA Copier, model DC -3648
in the amount of $8,885.92 from EGP, Inc., b) approved an
Annual Maintenance Agreement in the amount of $810.00 from
EGP, Inc. - MITA, c) authorized the surplus of the outdated
blue -line copier, and d) authorized the Director of Utilities to
execute all required documents, as recommended in the
memorandum.
esoluti6
ties - TI
* AittHn
Frui
VON
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
cellati,
29 thru 2001-036 -
yak L n ase
Housch (r,
Laurel B
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
To: Board of Commissioners
Through: Paul G. BaCounty Attorney
From: Lea R. Keller, CLA, Legal Assistant
Re: Recently Acquired Property = Tax Cancellation
April 3, 2001
8
i1 X06
IN
Recently Acquiree
Flopment (r/w 33rd
'w Willow Street);
r/w 58th Avenue);
PL Vero (r/w 58th
March 15, 2001
7.H. R
N
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously a) approved
Option A for the purchase of a MITA Copier, model DC -3648
in the amount of $8,885.92 from EGP, Inc., b) approved an
Annual Maintenance Agreement in the amount of $810.00 from
EGP, Inc. - MITA, c) authorized the surplus of the outdated
blue -line copier, and d) authorized the Director of Utilities to
execute all required documents, as recommended in the
memorandum.
esoluti6
ties - TI
* AittHn
Frui
VON
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
cellati,
29 thru 2001-036 -
yak L n ase
Housch (r,
Laurel B
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 15, 2001:
To: Board of Commissioners
Through: Paul G. BaCounty Attorney
From: Lea R. Keller, CLA, Legal Assistant
Re: Recently Acquired Property = Tax Cancellation
April 3, 2001
8
i1 X06
IN
Recently Acquiree
Flopment (r/w 33rd
'w Willow Street);
r/w 58th Avenue);
PL Vero (r/w 58th
March 15, 2001
Indian River County recently acquired some real property and, pursuant to Section 196.28,
Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners may cancel and discharge any liens for
taxes owed on the property as long as it was acquired for public purpose. Such cancellation is
accomplished by resolution of the Board, with a certified copy being forwarded to the Tax
Collector (along with copies sent to the Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Requested Action:
Adopt and authorize the Chairman to sign the following resolutions:
1)
R/W
— 331° Street — OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT
2)
RNV
— Willow Street — BITTNER
3)
R/W
— Willow Street — HOUSCH
4)
R/W
— Fellsmere Sidewalk — GARCIA
5)
R/W
— 58" Avenue — LAUREL BLDRS.
6)
R/W
— 43i° Avenue — HYATT FRUIT
7)
RNV
— 58" Avenue — LAKE GRACE OF VERO
8)
R/W
— 5" Street SW - BECHTOLD
April 3, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-029 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Oak Chase
Development - R/W 33rd Street)
19 B i PG 707
Indian River County recently acquired some real property and, pursuant to Section 196.28,
Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners may cancel and discharge any liens for
taxes owed on the property as long as it was acquired for public purpose. Such cancellation is
accomplished by resolution of the Board, with a certified copy being forwarded to the Tax
Collector (along with copies sent to the Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Requested Action:
Adopt and authorize the Chairman to sign the following resolutions:
1)
R/W
— 331° Street — OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT
2)
RNV
— Willow Street — BITTNER
3)
R/W
— Willow Street — HOUSCH
4)
R/W
— Fellsmere Sidewalk — GARCIA
5)
R/W
— 58" Avenue — LAUREL BLDRS.
6)
R/W
— 43i° Avenue — HYATT FRUIT
7)
RNV
— 58" Avenue — LAKE GRACE OF VERO
8)
R/W
— 5" Street SW - BECHTOLD
April 3, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-029 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Oak Chase
Development - R/W 33rd Street)
19 B i PG 707
Indian River County recently acquired some real property and, pursuant to Section 196.28,
Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners may cancel and discharge any liens for
taxes owed on the property as long as it was acquired for public purpose. Such cancellation is
accomplished by resolution of the Board, with a certified copy being forwarded to the Tax
Collector (along with copies sent to the Property Appraiser and Fixed Assets).
Requested Action:
Adopt and authorize the Chairman to sign the following resolutions:
1)
R/W
— 331° Street — OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT
2)
RNV
— Willow Street — BITTNER
3)
R/W
— Willow Street — HOUSCH
4)
R/W
— Fellsmere Sidewalk — GARCIA
5)
R/W
— 58" Avenue — LAUREL BLDRS.
6)
R/W
— 43i° Avenue — HYATT FRUIT
7)
RNV
— 58" Avenue — LAKE GRACE OF VERO
8)
R/W
— 5" Street SW - BECHTOLD
April 3, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-029 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Oak Chase
Development - R/W 33rd Street)
19 B i PG 707
Re: RNV — 331 Street _
Oak Chase Development
Tax ID 32-32-39-1-40-1.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 029
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1376, Page 826 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April .2001.
Att�o K. Barton, Clerk
B,,,
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
20
By ���
Caroline D. Ginn T—
Chairman
Re: RNV — 331 Street _
Oak Chase Development
Tax ID 32-32-39-1-40-1.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 029
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1376, Page 826 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April .2001.
Att�o K. Barton, Clerk
B,,,
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
20
By ���
Caroline D. Ginn T—
Chairman
Re: RNV — 331 Street _
Oak Chase Development
Tax ID 32-32-39-1-40-1.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 029
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1376, Page 826 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April .2001.
Att�o K. Barton, Clerk
B,,,
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
20
By ���
Caroline D. Ginn T—
Chairman
:J Suntory Warranty Deed 10/00deed\33/kMN
' 0 OD R/W - 33rd street (bcc 10/24/00) DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
Tax ID #32.32-39-00001-0040-00001.0
DEED syO•toe)
!1 THE RECORDS OR
NOTE = JEFFREY K. BARTON
JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLAL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED r\
THIS INDENTURE, made this LL day of SIhNu" 2001, between OAK CHASE
DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, whose address is 3201 Cardinal n
Drive, 2"d Floor, Vero Beach, FL 32963, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political CJ
subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Five Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and
other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRAN'TEE'S o
heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River
County, Florida: z
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF" Q,
"reserving unto the Grantor, its successors, assigns and/or mortgagees the right of
ingress and egress over referenced property to the 65'" Avenue entrance to Oak
Chase Subd., which property is being conveyed to Grantee for use as a right of way. " ry
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against the to
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the Vesence o : OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT,
sign: -
L.L.C.
Witness &;�gy /��1;1'
� r`I'7 /ti s•,lj. r
printe me: '�am s R. SAL,y6� David B. Chase
4 Managing -Member
si n•
Witnesf,[�
prin d name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 qday of SAN_ xA 2004, by
David B. Chase, Managing Member of OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., a Florida
limited liability corporation on behalf of same. e is personally known to me or produced pn
as identification.
ca
O
Notary Public: sign CID
tV
O�
stamped seal with printed
an and Coatmission N THOMAS R. SAWYER
This meat was '`':
Pr by MY COMMISSION t CC 776058
N�
and sh r EXPIRES: November 19, 2002
�7 d be ned to ^Fa.�e ` awdedTnmrmtanPunku"e.rwrtm
the Couatt;' a•ney'e Office,
C 184 ' Si., Beach,
April 3, 2001
21 BVx 1 f I b
:J Suntory Warranty Deed 10/00deed\33/kMN
' 0 OD R/W - 33rd street (bcc 10/24/00) DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
Tax ID #32.32-39-00001-0040-00001.0
DEED syO•toe)
!1 THE RECORDS OR
NOTE = JEFFREY K. BARTON
JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLAL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED r\
THIS INDENTURE, made this LL day of SIhNu" 2001, between OAK CHASE
DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, whose address is 3201 Cardinal n
Drive, 2"d Floor, Vero Beach, FL 32963, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political CJ
subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Five Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and
other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRAN'TEE'S o
heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River
County, Florida: z
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF" Q,
"reserving unto the Grantor, its successors, assigns and/or mortgagees the right of
ingress and egress over referenced property to the 65'" Avenue entrance to Oak
Chase Subd., which property is being conveyed to Grantee for use as a right of way. " ry
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against the to
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the Vesence o : OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT,
sign: -
L.L.C.
Witness &;�gy /��1;1'
� r`I'7 /ti s•,lj. r
printe me: '�am s R. SAL,y6� David B. Chase
4 Managing -Member
si n•
Witnesf,[�
prin d name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 qday of SAN_ xA 2004, by
David B. Chase, Managing Member of OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., a Florida
limited liability corporation on behalf of same. e is personally known to me or produced pn
as identification.
ca
O
Notary Public: sign CID
tV
O�
stamped seal with printed
an and Coatmission N THOMAS R. SAWYER
This meat was '`':
Pr by MY COMMISSION t CC 776058
N�
and sh r EXPIRES: November 19, 2002
�7 d be ned to ^Fa.�e ` awdedTnmrmtanPunku"e.rwrtm
the Couatt;' a•ney'e Office,
C 184 ' Si., Beach,
April 3, 2001
21 BVx 1 f I b
:J Suntory Warranty Deed 10/00deed\33/kMN
' 0 OD R/W - 33rd street (bcc 10/24/00) DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
Tax ID #32.32-39-00001-0040-00001.0
DEED syO•toe)
!1 THE RECORDS OR
NOTE = JEFFREY K. BARTON
JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLAL
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED r\
THIS INDENTURE, made this LL day of SIhNu" 2001, between OAK CHASE
DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, whose address is 3201 Cardinal n
Drive, 2"d Floor, Vero Beach, FL 32963, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political CJ
subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Five Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and
other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRAN'TEE'S o
heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River
County, Florida: z
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF" Q,
"reserving unto the Grantor, its successors, assigns and/or mortgagees the right of
ingress and egress over referenced property to the 65'" Avenue entrance to Oak
Chase Subd., which property is being conveyed to Grantee for use as a right of way. " ry
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against the to
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the Vesence o : OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT,
sign: -
L.L.C.
Witness &;�gy /��1;1'
� r`I'7 /ti s•,lj. r
printe me: '�am s R. SAL,y6� David B. Chase
4 Managing -Member
si n•
Witnesf,[�
prin d name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 qday of SAN_ xA 2004, by
David B. Chase, Managing Member of OAK CHASE DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., a Florida
limited liability corporation on behalf of same. e is personally known to me or produced pn
as identification.
ca
O
Notary Public: sign CID
tV
O�
stamped seal with printed
an and Coatmission N THOMAS R. SAWYER
This meat was '`':
Pr by MY COMMISSION t CC 776058
N�
and sh r EXPIRES: November 19, 2002
�7 d be ned to ^Fa.�e ` awdedTnmrmtanPunku"e.rwrtm
the Couatt;' a•ney'e Office,
C 184 ' Si., Beach,
April 3, 2001
21 BVx 1 f I b
u oo 'a s a 0 -u-0 to Fn
�po ° 3 cco n znan -
`" ' ° ° Lateral "A"
Ln N rn N, (D 0 1 27 E 7 N 0 O CD Canal
°i -J o n u N °. to ? HOZ O
I O 7 O N/
CO to C) < `D D O a 3 ° s t7
p�no rnrm Z o� �N
Orrib 0
n C: 3 C) � O 7 S 7 O N o O)
N d i O T
T7� a�a35a, m7
< CD Dorn o o�o?mn Z �O
O (n cc
^ 7 N- N
W CD rn rn rn CD N T
< .° (D _
n 7.' S� 0 CD o n 7 (n S
-:Tn N n n rD Q o o rn 30' 30' 30'
-- U S c CDD CO (n 7 S
f-' {a rD - 7 rD O _7D --
L4 CD Co CD in
N CD S ,T C O in N 7
CID o � -1° O �
7
o s0 apC o �rD rt
CD ° n o
CD 3 O 0 N
oN N3.rpo "c3 S �.
o C ccs m7aom
(DC 3 n11n o n
rD _ 7 n m
m<oo cn _
CD
3 CD Q o
< a a
inLic
no ° I n
0 3 0— 1—
3o
CD 0 —
o O) C�
CD CD
n (�
m° °m — u o
a� o �o O
D
°.co z
M �. J 7
T �c LID I
-a Cn LU (D —i % D T1 cn
0CDc o 7 o
0(D
to 5. < z- n o
.� JC d vl (D o D v
N °O N CP
Z in 7 � W
O = n —
z o� Coo O [7
N a Q a
M
n- K
7 S o
�7 f7 Z O r ^
O Z `.' J
O � p CD
~ o
-
-C D (D C) T c
CD it
C° D
nLn
Z G7 in rD C
C)
�c a
Z o
m o ° ° 0 30' 30' 30' E. Line Tract 5
g 0 o� c
c�X J CL c
OrD T c
M Z o(D EXHIBIT BIA — r
K: • a
m o'
Ei ACAD DWG, FILE: SUBLATA4.DWG Plotted 9-21 -DO
April 3, 2001
_ 22
Pb 10
J
J
n
0
D
J
J
u oo 'a s a 0 -u-0 to Fn
�po ° 3 cco n znan -
`" ' ° ° Lateral "A"
Ln N rn N, (D 0 1 27 E 7 N 0 O CD Canal
°i -J o n u N °. to ? HOZ O
I O 7 O N/
CO to C) < `D D O a 3 ° s t7
p�no rnrm Z o� �N
Orrib 0
n C: 3 C) � O 7 S 7 O N o O)
N d i O T
T7� a�a35a, m7
< CD Dorn o o�o?mn Z �O
O (n cc
^ 7 N- N
W CD rn rn rn CD N T
< .° (D _
n 7.' S� 0 CD o n 7 (n S
-:Tn N n n rD Q o o rn 30' 30' 30'
-- U S c CDD CO (n 7 S
f-' {a rD - 7 rD O _7D --
L4 CD Co CD in
N CD S ,T C O in N 7
CID o � -1° O �
7
o s0 apC o �rD rt
CD ° n o
CD 3 O 0 N
oN N3.rpo "c3 S �.
o C ccs m7aom
(DC 3 n11n o n
rD _ 7 n m
m<oo cn _
CD
3 CD Q o
< a a
inLic
no ° I n
0 3 0— 1—
3o
CD 0 —
o O) C�
CD CD
n (�
m° °m — u o
a� o �o O
D
°.co z
M �. J 7
T �c LID I
-a Cn LU (D —i % D T1 cn
0CDc o 7 o
0(D
to 5. < z- n o
.� JC d vl (D o D v
N °O N CP
Z in 7 � W
O = n —
z o� Coo O [7
N a Q a
M
n- K
7 S o
�7 f7 Z O r ^
O Z `.' J
O � p CD
~ o
-
-C D (D C) T c
CD it
C° D
nLn
Z G7 in rD C
C)
�c a
Z o
m o ° ° 0 30' 30' 30' E. Line Tract 5
g 0 o� c
c�X J CL c
OrD T c
M Z o(D EXHIBIT BIA — r
K: • a
m o'
Ei ACAD DWG, FILE: SUBLATA4.DWG Plotted 9-21 -DO
April 3, 2001
_ 22
Pb 10
J
J
n
0
D
J
J
u oo 'a s a 0 -u-0 to Fn
�po ° 3 cco n znan -
`" ' ° ° Lateral "A"
Ln N rn N, (D 0 1 27 E 7 N 0 O CD Canal
°i -J o n u N °. to ? HOZ O
I O 7 O N/
CO to C) < `D D O a 3 ° s t7
p�no rnrm Z o� �N
Orrib 0
n C: 3 C) � O 7 S 7 O N o O)
N d i O T
T7� a�a35a, m7
< CD Dorn o o�o?mn Z �O
O (n cc
^ 7 N- N
W CD rn rn rn CD N T
< .° (D _
n 7.' S� 0 CD o n 7 (n S
-:Tn N n n rD Q o o rn 30' 30' 30'
-- U S c CDD CO (n 7 S
f-' {a rD - 7 rD O _7D --
L4 CD Co CD in
N CD S ,T C O in N 7
CID o � -1° O �
7
o s0 apC o �rD rt
CD ° n o
CD 3 O 0 N
oN N3.rpo "c3 S �.
o C ccs m7aom
(DC 3 n11n o n
rD _ 7 n m
m<oo cn _
CD
3 CD Q o
< a a
inLic
no ° I n
0 3 0— 1—
3o
CD 0 —
o O) C�
CD CD
n (�
m° °m — u o
a� o �o O
D
°.co z
M �. J 7
T �c LID I
-a Cn LU (D —i % D T1 cn
0CDc o 7 o
0(D
to 5. < z- n o
.� JC d vl (D o D v
N °O N CP
Z in 7 � W
O = n —
z o� Coo O [7
N a Q a
M
n- K
7 S o
�7 f7 Z O r ^
O Z `.' J
O � p CD
~ o
-
-C D (D C) T c
CD it
C° D
nLn
Z G7 in rD C
C)
�c a
Z o
m o ° ° 0 30' 30' 30' E. Line Tract 5
g 0 o� c
c�X J CL c
OrD T c
M Z o(D EXHIBIT BIA — r
K: • a
m o'
Ei ACAD DWG, FILE: SUBLATA4.DWG Plotted 9-21 -DO
April 3, 2001
_ 22
Pb 10
J
J
n
0
D
J
J
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-030 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands. pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes
r/w Wi l l ovv Street)
Re R/W - Willow Street
Gerald John Bittner
Tax ID 00-31-37-1-2154-1.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 030
(Bittner -
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
3. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1376, Page 828 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
4. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner - Stanbri dqe and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri 1 , 2001.
Attes K. Barton, Clerk/��,
By, �f7ovlez
DeDuty Clerk
April 3, 2001
23
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Byti2o-Ed�ry�
Caroline D. Ginn il
Chairman
81 117 FIG 711
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-030 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands. pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes
r/w Wi l l ovv Street)
Re R/W - Willow Street
Gerald John Bittner
Tax ID 00-31-37-1-2154-1.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 030
(Bittner -
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
3. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1376, Page 828 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
4. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner - Stanbri dqe and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri 1 , 2001.
Attes K. Barton, Clerk/��,
By, �f7ovlez
DeDuty Clerk
April 3, 2001
23
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Byti2o-Ed�ry�
Caroline D. Ginn il
Chairman
81 117 FIG 711
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-030 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands. pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes
r/w Wi l l ovv Street)
Re R/W - Willow Street
Gerald John Bittner
Tax ID 00-31-37-1-2154-1.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 030
(Bittner -
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
3. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1376, Page 828 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
4. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner - Stanbri dqe and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri 1 , 2001.
Attes K. Barton, Clerk/��,
By, �f7ovlez
DeDuty Clerk
April 3, 2001
23
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Byti2o-Ed�ry�
Caroline D. Ginn il
Chairman
81 117 FIG 711
aa.
Statutory WD - Willow Street
Tax ID A'00-31-37-00001-2154-00001.0 DOCUMEII OW
DEED j as .I• -(O
NOTE j
JEFFRFYK. 11A"", CLERK
INDIAN iiIYEA COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
12/00 (deed/wi llow)R C/k
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON —
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
THIS INDENTURE, made this /0 day of,Q��.e
001, between
GERALD JOHN BITTNER, a single man, whose address is Post Office Box 925,
Fellsmere, FL 32948, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Three Thousand Two Hundred
Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and
sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signf d in -i presence of:
sign: =4 A .
Witness
printed name:%�f� PEsff /-n o•�'�ar L L -
sign:
fitness
Printed name: f fyv41-eZ5 /1q�
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
the land, and will defend the same
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
GERALD JOHN BITTNER, who is personally known to me or
as identification.
April 3, 2001
I �;
4eraa1d!j=ohnZ'�
(' ner
daLlo cL�v� 001, by
Notary Public
"" r t BARAiL1 DONALD MARTIN
MY COMMISSION i CC
• A= EXPIRES: Lbk, 2004
salad TiwP$�2004
24
4
R
N
M�;
W
Ql
-o
G7
CD
00
N
co
stamped seal with printed
name and Commission #
I: WR rpppr�od by
7
e.
April 3, 2001
I �;
4eraa1d!j=ohnZ'�
(' ner
daLlo cL�v� 001, by
Notary Public
"" r t BARAiL1 DONALD MARTIN
MY COMMISSION i CC
• A= EXPIRES: Lbk, 2004
salad TiwP$�2004
24
4
R
N
M�;
W
Ql
-o
G7
CD
00
N
co
aa.
Statutory WD - Willow Street
Tax ID A'00-31-37-00001-2154-00001.0 DOCUMEII OW
DEED j as .I• -(O
NOTE j
JEFFRFYK. 11A"", CLERK
INDIAN iiIYEA COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
12/00 (deed/wi llow)R C/k
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON —
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
THIS INDENTURE, made this /0 day of,Q��.e
001, between
GERALD JOHN BITTNER, a single man, whose address is Post Office Box 925,
Fellsmere, FL 32948, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Three Thousand Two Hundred
Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and
sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signf d in -i presence of:
sign: =4 A .
Witness
printed name:%�f� PEsff /-n o•�'�ar L L -
sign:
fitness
Printed name: f fyv41-eZ5 /1q�
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
the land, and will defend the same
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
GERALD JOHN BITTNER, who is personally known to me or
as identification.
April 3, 2001
I �;
4eraa1d!j=ohnZ'�
(' ner
daLlo cL�v� 001, by
Notary Public
"" r t BARAiL1 DONALD MARTIN
MY COMMISSION i CC
• A= EXPIRES: Lbk, 2004
salad TiwP$�2004
24
4
R
N
M�;
W
Ql
-o
G7
CD
00
N
co
stamped seal with printed
name and Commission #
I: WR rpppr�od by
7
e.
April 3, 2001
I �;
4eraa1d!j=ohnZ'�
(' ner
daLlo cL�v� 001, by
Notary Public
"" r t BARAiL1 DONALD MARTIN
MY COMMISSION i CC
• A= EXPIRES: Lbk, 2004
salad TiwP$�2004
24
4
R
N
M�;
W
Ql
-o
G7
CD
00
N
co
aa.
Statutory WD - Willow Street
Tax ID A'00-31-37-00001-2154-00001.0 DOCUMEII OW
DEED j as .I• -(O
NOTE j
JEFFRFYK. 11A"", CLERK
INDIAN iiIYEA COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
12/00 (deed/wi llow)R C/k
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON —
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
THIS INDENTURE, made this /0 day of,Q��.e
001, between
GERALD JOHN BITTNER, a single man, whose address is Post Office Box 925,
Fellsmere, FL 32948, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Three Thousand Two Hundred
Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and
sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signf d in -i presence of:
sign: =4 A .
Witness
printed name:%�f� PEsff /-n o•�'�ar L L -
sign:
fitness
Printed name: f fyv41-eZ5 /1q�
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
the land, and will defend the same
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
GERALD JOHN BITTNER, who is personally known to me or
as identification.
April 3, 2001
I �;
4eraa1d!j=ohnZ'�
(' ner
daLlo cL�v� 001, by
Notary Public
"" r t BARAiL1 DONALD MARTIN
MY COMMISSION i CC
• A= EXPIRES: Lbk, 2004
salad TiwP$�2004
24
4
R
N
M�;
W
Ql
-o
G7
CD
00
N
co
stamped seal with printed
name and Commission #
I: WR rpppr�od by
7
e.
April 3, 2001
I �;
4eraa1d!j=ohnZ'�
(' ner
daLlo cL�v� 001, by
Notary Public
"" r t BARAiL1 DONALD MARTIN
MY COMMISSION i CC
• A= EXPIRES: Lbk, 2004
salad TiwP$�2004
24
4
R
N
M�;
W
Ql
-o
G7
CD
00
N
co
°nC1 :7 S f7 c c i'TI
J i o o C S D
7 (D p ...0 n f C < O r
�7N?aro �O —° x'< r p Ditch 21
m, o f° D � �' n a ti (83rd Street) O
7 . Ln a n
3 w�° Z ' N" ° �,v 20'120'
c o [\ s3 acv° o nm o
'<l V n.�" ro c ocn�r° Z
Ln 0 nFJ '��£o
N
< C C
<
Cl)
O :E Z x
o n o m o u o
3 �.
C
AtifnD T 0 0
O O O O -
n C °
�D C� a - o c y r-
n�
� Cc O 3 n
A 7 D
Ln
N n V N T
wtnI
O< N (D a n ru v
C1
o
N O a I
m
J m o:
CL c o D (/)
T ° Ln 0 3 n �:b TF1
r
°a< mp r Z
O 7El r
CO ro O O o l
° N� N
V O A N Q CJ1 I
O a
C < 1>
:
n' C W
�O N p
9 pC" N x
aaa n n
m _ V n'
q n OT
M Y 0O m rSo O i0 I
M G p O
m^r) O
CD m CD
N o � ^ o a
cn o a O
_ n o
C O Z O
O OO n
a n
FnN
C v
a z��
am o 0
Ln
z;o
�0 EXHIBI I 2 2
ACAD DWG. FILE: WILODESC.DWG Piotted 6-27-00
April 3, 2001
25
°nC1 :7 S f7 c c i'TI
J i o o C S D
7 (D p ...0 n f C < O r
�7N?aro �O —° x'< r p Ditch 21
m, o f° D � �' n a ti (83rd Street) O
7 . Ln a n
3 w�° Z ' N" ° �,v 20'120'
c o [\ s3 acv° o nm o
Ln 0 nFJ '��£o
N
< C C
<
Cl)
O :E Z x
o n o m o u o
3 �.
C
AtifnD T 0 0
O O O O -
n C °
�D C� a - o c y r-
n�
� Cc O 3 n
A 7 D
Ln
N n V N T
wtnI
O< N (D a n ru v
C1
o
N O a I
m
J m o:
CL c o D (/)
T ° Ln 0 3 n �:b TF1
r
°a< mp r Z
O 7El r
CO ro O O o l
° N� N
V O A N Q CJ1 I
O a
C < 1>
:
n' C W
�O N p
9 pC" N x
aaa n n
m _ V n'
q n OT
M Y 0O m rSo O i0 I
M G p O
m^r) O
CD m CD
N o � ^ o a
cn o a O
_ n o
C O Z O
O OO n
a n
FnN
C v
a z��
am o 0
Ln
z;o
�0 EXHIBI I 2 2
ACAD DWG. FILE: WILODESC.DWG Piotted 6-27-00
April 3, 2001
25
°nC1 :7 S f7 c c i'TI
J i o o C S D
7 (D p ...0 n f C < O r
�7N?aro �O —° x'< r p Ditch 21
m, o f° D � �' n a ti (83rd Street) O
7 . Ln a n
3 w�° Z ' N" ° �,v 20'120'
c o [\ s3 acv° o nm o
Ln 0 nFJ '��£o
N
< C C
<
Cl)
O :E Z x
o n o m o u o
3 �.
C
AtifnD T 0 0
O O O O -
n C °
�D C� a - o c y r-
n�
� Cc O 3 n
A 7 D
Ln
N n V N T
wtnI
O< N (D a n ru v
C1
o
N O a I
m
J m o:
CL c o D (/)
T ° Ln 0 3 n �:b TF1
r
°a< mp r Z
O 7El r
CO ro O O o l
° N� N
V O A N Q CJ1 I
O a
C < 1>
:
n' C W
�O N p
9 pC" N x
aaa n n
m _ V n'
q n OT
M Y 0O m rSo O i0 I
M G p O
m^r) O
CD m CD
N o � ^ o a
cn o a O
_ n o
C O Z O
O OO n
a n
FnN
C v
a z��
am o 0
Ln
z;o
�0 EXHIBI I 2 2
ACAD DWG. FILE: WILODESC.DWG Piotted 6-27-00
April 3, 2001
25
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-031 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Housch -
r/w Willow Street)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 031
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
5. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1378, Page 859 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
6. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri 1 , 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk/
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
1 1 7 PG �� 14
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
26
By zfiF,� Z. /
Caroline D. Gin
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-031 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Housch -
r/w Willow Street)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 031
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
5. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1378, Page 859 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
6. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri 1 , 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk/
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
1 1 7 PG �� 14
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
26
By zfiF,� Z. /
Caroline D. Gin
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-031 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Housch -
r/w Willow Street)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 031
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
5. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1378, Page 859 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
6. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri 1 , 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk/
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
1 1 7 PG �� 14
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
26
By zfiF,� Z. /
Caroline D. Gin
Chairman
V
Q
a
v
Statutory WD — Willow Street
Tax /D #00-31-37-00011-1954-00003.0
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED S3S",nd
NOTE$
JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLEK.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
11 /00(deed/wi Ilow)RC/k
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
THIS INDENTURE, made this /ff.Aay of SFiN 200/, between
Y. TOMMY HOUSCH, 407 S. Lake Avenue, Pahokee, FL 33476, GRANTOR, and
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, 1840 25th
Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Four Thousand Nine Hundred
Ninety -Nine Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand
paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the
following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR
does
hereby fully
warrant
the title to the land, and will defend the same
against the
lawful
claims
of
all
persons
whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign:
7 printed name: [/ss(f
I
sign: pj.A^
fitness
printed name: le I�Ja 1l
STATE OF FLORID
�( COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisf„r�day of fiN fIe , 200, by
Y. TOMMY HOUSCH who is personally known to me or produced
as identification.
sign:
stamped seal with printed OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL otary Public
name and Commission # KATHY BOSWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC802237
MY COMMISSION EXP. JAN. 13,2003
April 3, 2001
27
E
V
Q
a
v
Statutory WD — Willow Street
Tax /D #00-31-37-00011-1954-00003.0
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED S3S",nd
NOTE$
JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLEK.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
11 /00(deed/wi Ilow)RC/k
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
THIS INDENTURE, made this /ff.Aay of SFiN 200/, between
Y. TOMMY HOUSCH, 407 S. Lake Avenue, Pahokee, FL 33476, GRANTOR, and
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, 1840 25th
Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Four Thousand Nine Hundred
Ninety -Nine Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand
paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the
following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR
does
hereby fully
warrant
the title to the land, and will defend the same
against the
lawful
claims
of
all
persons
whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign:
7 printed name: [/ss(f
I
sign: pj.A^
fitness
printed name: le I�Ja 1l
STATE OF FLORID
�( COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisf„r�day of fiN fIe , 200, by
Y. TOMMY HOUSCH who is personally known to me or produced
as identification.
sign:
stamped seal with printed OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL otary Public
name and Commission # KATHY BOSWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC802237
MY COMMISSION EXP. JAN. 13,2003
April 3, 2001
27
E
V
Q
a
v
Statutory WD — Willow Street
Tax /D #00-31-37-00011-1954-00003.0
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED S3S",nd
NOTE$
JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLEK.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
11 /00(deed/wi Ilow)RC/k
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
THIS INDENTURE, made this /ff.Aay of SFiN 200/, between
Y. TOMMY HOUSCH, 407 S. Lake Avenue, Pahokee, FL 33476, GRANTOR, and
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, 1840 25th
Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Four Thousand Nine Hundred
Ninety -Nine Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand
paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the
following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR
does
hereby fully
warrant
the title to the land, and will defend the same
against the
lawful
claims
of
all
persons
whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign:
7 printed name: [/ss(f
I
sign: pj.A^
fitness
printed name: le I�Ja 1l
STATE OF FLORID
�( COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisf„r�day of fiN fIe , 200, by
Y. TOMMY HOUSCH who is personally known to me or produced
as identification.
sign:
stamped seal with printed OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL otary Public
name and Commission # KATHY BOSWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC802237
MY COMMISSION EXP. JAN. 13,2003
April 3, 2001
27
E
April 3, 2001
C C: C �O - OR
C C DD
a0(7 Z(0) Cc i
O O
O ti �J C 7
C
0 0 n< m I
yam n o �� * 0 Ditch 21 0
�o °o�yAN
(83rd Street)
n o
Z n
ao 0 0 "n^n �
c 3 nz
2D'I 20'
O\nw o m 0�o3 a°Z:rm O
°02i
�^ l O y..O O I
� m
Cn
N -' =n < p n m T fTl
O J O S or �i N m O y' MlM N5 -O n O N O W O
O.m 0 C !D C C 7 _
a 3 p
A C 3 oL4
O 3 0 •� O 7 v Z7
A O 0 o 7� O I
� J
J O p a a; O r
�a— o opUl o -
n'
rn p 3
.. O
WH O V j Cn
NM A
^ a3 N :EN
�! J p ry iO. A O
wtn aarD ° o I
O fJ �I
Oa Vf�,
< m a n O W
a�T ° N r O
° m-0 0 0.3
r l y
D < N N
(D O O
aO 0
O p
0 Ln p C7 I
N 0. cc) lD0 'l�J �.I
° °
°0 3 rri
Q J G
o ° ° o
N N
SRO mac_
� D0
G7 m' a O N
Op N Cr Ln
n'a a --
C 'o 0
0
n
J T p O.
M O n a O
0j 7 N OT 0
v o a v (o
m�m ad
O O O
9` n
O T
y , 0 J s
r�am ry n
o
O (n n
c7 l
~�
.n
5
� O w
0l O N 0 T
ry
n a�
n N N T w
O C
O c I n
n 0 D
C >
I
CaF.j C v
Q 0
rn
m o O
IL HiQIT n" 2D 2D11
M
M
ACAD DWG. FILE: WILODESC.DWG Plotted 6-27-00
PO' 16
April 3, 2001
C C: C �O - OR
C C DD
a0(7 Z(0) Cc i
O O
O ti �J C 7
C
0 0 n< m I
yam n o �� * 0 Ditch 21 0
�o °o�yAN
(83rd Street)
n o
Z n
ao 0 0 "n^n �
c 3 nz
2D'I 20'
O\nw o m 0�o3 a°Z:rm O
°02i
�^ l O y..O O I
� m
Cn
N -' =n < p n m T fTl
O J O S or �i N m O y' MlM N5 -O n O N O W O
O.m 0 C !D C C 7 _
a 3 p
A C 3 oL4
O 3 0 •� O 7 v Z7
A O 0 o 7� O I
� J
J O p a a; O r
�a— o opUl o -
n'
rn p 3
.. O
WH O V j Cn
NM A
^ a3 N :EN
�! J p ry iO. A O
wtn aarD ° o I
O fJ �I
Oa Vf�,
< m a n O W
a�T ° N r O
° m-0 0 0.3
r l y
D < N N
(D O O
aO 0
O p
0 Ln p C7 I
N 0. cc) lD0 'l�J �.I
° °
°0 3 rri
Q J G
o ° ° o
N N
SRO mac_
� D0
G7 m' a O N
Op N Cr Ln
n'a a --
C 'o 0
0
n
J T p O.
M O n a O
0j 7 N OT 0
v o a v (o
m�m ad
O O O
9` n
O T
y , 0 J s
r�am ry n
o
O (n n
c7 l
~�
.n
5
� O w
0l O N 0 T
ry
n a�
n N N T w
O C
O c I n
n 0 D
C >
I
CaF.j C v
Q 0
rn
m o O
IL HiQIT n" 2D 2D11
M
M
ACAD DWG. FILE: WILODESC.DWG Plotted 6-27-00
PO' 16
April 3, 2001
C C: C �O - OR
C C DD
a0(7 Z(0) Cc i
O O
O ti �J C 7
C
0 0 n< m I
yam n o �� * 0 Ditch 21 0
�o °o�yAN
(83rd Street)
n o
Z n
ao 0 0 "n^n �
c 3 nz
2D'I 20'
O\nw o m 0�o3 a°Z:rm O
°02i
�^ l O y..O O I
� m
Cn
N -' =n < p n m T fTl
O J O S or �i N m O y' MlM N5 -O n O N O W O
O.m 0 C !D C C 7 _
a 3 p
A C 3 oL4
O 3 0 •� O 7 v Z7
A O 0 o 7� O I
� J
J O p a a; O r
�a— o opUl o -
n'
rn p 3
.. O
WH O V j Cn
NM A
^ a3 N :EN
�! J p ry iO. A O
wtn aarD ° o I
O fJ �I
Oa Vf�,
< m a n O W
a�T ° N r O
° m-0 0 0.3
r l y
D < N N
(D O O
aO 0
O p
0 Ln p C7 I
N 0. cc) lD0 'l�J �.I
° °
°0 3 rri
Q J G
o ° ° o
N N
SRO mac_
� D0
G7 m' a O N
Op N Cr Ln
n'a a --
C 'o 0
0
n
J T p O.
M O n a O
0j 7 N OT 0
v o a v (o
m�m ad
O O O
9` n
O T
y , 0 J s
r�am ry n
o
O (n n
c7 l
~�
.n
5
� O w
0l O N 0 T
ry
n a�
n N N T w
O C
O c I n
n 0 D
C >
I
CaF.j C v
Q 0
rn
m o O
IL HiQIT n" 2D 2D11
M
M
ACAD DWG. FILE: WILODESC.DWG Plotted 6-27-00
PO' 16
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-032 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Garcia -
r/w Fellsmere Sidewalk)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 032
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes. delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
7. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1379, Page 427 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
8. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dq e and the
the vote was as follows: — and, upon being put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner John W. Ti Aye
ppin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Anri 1 , 2001.
Atte Barton, Clerk
By.
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
29
By Cxsti
Caroline D. Ginn U
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-032 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Garcia -
r/w Fellsmere Sidewalk)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 032
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes. delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
7. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1379, Page 427 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
8. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dq e and the
the vote was as follows: — and, upon being put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner John W. Ti Aye
ppin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Anri 1 , 2001.
Atte Barton, Clerk
By.
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
29
By Cxsti
Caroline D. Ginn U
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-032 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Garcia -
r/w Fellsmere Sidewalk)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 032
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes. delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
7. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1379, Page 427 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
8. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dq e and the
the vote was as follows: — and, upon being put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner John W. Ti Aye
ppin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Anri 1 , 2001.
Atte Barton, Clerk
By.
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
29
By Cxsti
Caroline D. Ginn U
Chairman
Statutory Warranty Deed — Fellsmere Sidewalk
y Tax ID #Gb-31-37-00009-0850-00001.0
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED $
NOTES
JEFFREY X QAFrMN, CLERK
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
7/18/00(deed)RCk
PI THE RECORDS OF
-JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO,* FLAL
THIS INDENTURE, made this /'day of _ e .ea/Lh�, 2000, between
HERLINDO GARCIA and MARIA G. GARCIA, his wife, whose address is
259 S. Broadway, Fellsmere, FL 32948, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which
is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of One Thousand Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and
sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
7
sign:
itness
Printed name: RfC440o
sign:
itnes
Printed name: i�,7,eeu� cue
,�>PZ
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
�7
Li Gyr-y
Herlindo Garcia
Maria G. Garcia
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / V11day of Cis
2000, by HERLINDO GARCIA and MARIA G. GARCIA, his wi e, and they are
Personally known to me or produced
as identification.
D� sign:
,pr P&
dl
name 8 Commission # +° • ' •�� PAULA. MIATTi:W
CC 4 * , MY COMMISSION Y CC 949177
This ,doe»a>�� ared q4 a EXPIRES: August 18.2004
• 'rasrt� Bonded TMu Budget Nowy 6.,c.
and should be returned to
the Couigy Attorney's Office,
),fes 25th §t.7 yero Beach
�orid ,32960
April 3, 2001
30
Notary Public
CIF
C
t.c
CZ
CA:
c
4
u
kr
r
Z7
r\
Statutory Warranty Deed — Fellsmere Sidewalk
y Tax ID #Gb-31-37-00009-0850-00001.0
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED $
NOTES
JEFFREY X QAFrMN, CLERK
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
7/18/00(deed)RCk
PI THE RECORDS OF
-JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO,* FLAL
THIS INDENTURE, made this /'day of _ e .ea/Lh�, 2000, between
HERLINDO GARCIA and MARIA G. GARCIA, his wife, whose address is
259 S. Broadway, Fellsmere, FL 32948, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which
is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of One Thousand Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and
sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
7
sign:
itness
Printed name: RfC440o
sign:
itnes
Printed name: i�,7,eeu� cue
,�>PZ
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
�7
Li Gyr-y
Herlindo Garcia
Maria G. Garcia
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / V11day of Cis
2000, by HERLINDO GARCIA and MARIA G. GARCIA, his wi e, and they are
Personally known to me or produced
as identification.
D� sign:
,pr P&
dl
name 8 Commission # +° • ' •�� PAULA. MIATTi:W
CC 4 * , MY COMMISSION Y CC 949177
This ,doe»a>�� ared q4 a EXPIRES: August 18.2004
• 'rasrt� Bonded TMu Budget Nowy 6.,c.
and should be returned to
the Couigy Attorney's Office,
),fes 25th §t.7 yero Beach
�orid ,32960
April 3, 2001
30
Notary Public
CIF
C
t.c
CZ
CA:
c
4
u
kr
r
Z7
r\
Statutory Warranty Deed — Fellsmere Sidewalk
y Tax ID #Gb-31-37-00009-0850-00001.0
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED $
NOTES
JEFFREY X QAFrMN, CLERK
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
7/18/00(deed)RCk
PI THE RECORDS OF
-JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO,* FLAL
THIS INDENTURE, made this /'day of _ e .ea/Lh�, 2000, between
HERLINDO GARCIA and MARIA G. GARCIA, his wife, whose address is
259 S. Broadway, Fellsmere, FL 32948, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which
is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of One Thousand Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and
sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
7
sign:
itness
Printed name: RfC440o
sign:
itnes
Printed name: i�,7,eeu� cue
,�>PZ
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
�7
Li Gyr-y
Herlindo Garcia
Maria G. Garcia
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / V11day of Cis
2000, by HERLINDO GARCIA and MARIA G. GARCIA, his wi e, and they are
Personally known to me or produced
as identification.
D� sign:
,pr P&
dl
name 8 Commission # +° • ' •�� PAULA. MIATTi:W
CC 4 * , MY COMMISSION Y CC 949177
This ,doe»a>�� ared q4 a EXPIRES: August 18.2004
• 'rasrt� Bonded TMu Budget Nowy 6.,c.
and should be returned to
the Couigy Attorney's Office,
),fes 25th §t.7 yero Beach
�orid ,32960
April 3, 2001
30
Notary Public
CIF
C
t.c
CZ
CA:
c
4
u
kr
r
Z7
r\
cnCC)as a s nFn
01 0 °. p �. � z C) -�
T p O O
�U
>(5 °.O Z 0
° � F O BROADWAY STREET
0 n rn = O N s0
0 z (100 RAW)
.- J (D O . O Ma .
asan
!D - 0 3 3 a Ln fD � O
U) -0 p N N z I I
° LA SSS J 1J L. 0 I I
00 0 O Ln .- (TN �D o-
n
I I r^
n l CD F S� T I I v
nC) I 'V
O
O st� '° m I I
r A
71 3 C - J O r r
c o Nm n D -n o l0
N S !D X
(D N S pp
Lo Io I
30 ° n I I
5.03 ;u °
CD
O NC C o Ooh I I r
co a n a-
3 r Cp I I C
n (D 0 O
a�a �O
0 15' Alley
n 3 r p
— 3 o n Co ]CI
v T°� �'0 cn I
> 0 Cl. � m J oNn 1aT o (bo°co0a V ° Q]
X N N N
Z N ` ` a, Z i
O O r
= a�.CD O O IO0v
Z -j 0 a --i -1 O N �
O N 1 J° O TI N
IU,
CT°° r I co \ o
l7 N 0 J aUI
O as N I o
Z
0 m � � I o
Z
ja I o G7
m m c - n 1 5
Z G7 CD N n 0 n O
Z r < ° J a
m 0 rnn n 20 II �.
M m ° a a m N n
C:
0 o PINE STREET v 0 cry
m o ° o (60 ' RAW) o y
y Z san C y.
--
rN
CD
m C /�
D. E X
o m 5,Lj1
CL --
O
m
ACAD DWG. FILE: FELLSMERE.DWG Plotted 7-1�-
9-00 V6
April 5, Zuul
31
BK 1 17 PG 1 19
cnCC)as a s nFn
01 0 °. p �. � z C) -�
T p O O
�U
>(5 °.O Z 0
° � F O BROADWAY STREET
0 n rn = O N s0
0 z (100 RAW)
.- J (D O . O Ma .
asan
!D - 0 3 3 a Ln fD � O
U) -0 p N N z I I
° LA SSS J 1J L. 0 I I
00 0 O Ln .- (TN �D o-
n
I I r^
n l CD F S� T I I v
nC) I 'V
O
O st� '° m I I
r A
71 3 C - J O r r
c o Nm n D -n o l0
N S !D X
(D N S pp
Lo Io I
30 ° n I I
5.03 ;u °
CD
O NC C o Ooh I I r
co a n a-
3 r Cp I I C
n (D 0 O
a�a �O
0 15' Alley
n 3 r p
— 3 o n Co ]CI
v T°� �'0 cn I
> 0 Cl. � m J oNn 1aT o (bo°co0a V ° Q]
X N N N
Z N ` ` a, Z i
O O r
= a�.CD O O IO0v
Z -j 0 a --i -1 O N �
O N 1 J° O TI N
IU,
CT°° r I co \ o
l7 N 0 J aUI
O as N I o
Z
0 m � � I o
Z
ja I o G7
m m c - n 1 5
Z G7 CD N n 0 n O
Z r < ° J a
m 0 rnn n 20 II �.
M m ° a a m N n
C:
0 o PINE STREET v 0 cry
m o ° o (60 ' RAW) o y
y Z san C y.
--
rN
CD
m C /�
D. E X
o m 5,Lj1
CL --
O
m
ACAD DWG. FILE: FELLSMERE.DWG Plotted 7-1�-
9-00 V6
April 5, Zuul
31
BK 1 17 PG 1 19
cnCC)as a s nFn
01 0 °. p �. � z C) -�
T p O O
�U
>(5 °.O Z 0
° � F O BROADWAY STREET
0 n rn = O N s0
0 z (100 RAW)
.- J (D O . O Ma .
asan
!D - 0 3 3 a Ln fD � O
U) -0 p N N z I I
° LA SSS J 1J L. 0 I I
00 0 O Ln .- (TN �D o-
n
I I r^
n l CD F S� T I I v
nC) I 'V
O
O st� '° m I I
r A
71 3 C - J O r r
c o Nm n D -n o l0
N S !D X
(D N S pp
Lo Io I
30 ° n I I
5.03 ;u °
CD
O NC C o Ooh I I r
co a n a-
3 r Cp I I C
n (D 0 O
a�a �O
0 15' Alley
n 3 r p
— 3 o n Co ]CI
v T°� �'0 cn I
> 0 Cl. � m J oNn 1aT o (bo°co0a V ° Q]
X N N N
Z N ` ` a, Z i
O O r
= a�.CD O O IO0v
Z -j 0 a --i -1 O N �
O N 1 J° O TI N
IU,
CT°° r I co \ o
l7 N 0 J aUI
O as N I o
Z
0 m � � I o
Z
ja I o G7
m m c - n 1 5
Z G7 CD N n 0 n O
Z r < ° J a
m 0 rnn n 20 II �.
M m ° a a m N n
C:
0 o PINE STREET v 0 cry
m o ° o (60 ' RAW) o y
y Z san C y.
--
rN
CD
m C /�
D. E X
o m 5,Lj1
CL --
O
m
ACAD DWG. FILE: FELLSMERE.DWG Plotted 7-1�-
9-00 V6
April 5, Zuul
31
BK 1 17 PG 1 19
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-033 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Laurel
Builders Inc. - r/w 581" Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 033
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
9. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1379, Page 1009
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
10. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April ,2001.
Attes Barton, CCller,
By: �2tr�„ ✓ /i �rLl�
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
32
By
Caroline D. Ginn
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-033 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Laurel
Builders Inc. - r/w 581" Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 033
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
9. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1379, Page 1009
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
10. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April ,2001.
Attes Barton, CCller,
By: �2tr�„ ✓ /i �rLl�
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
32
By
Caroline D. Ginn
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-033 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Laurel
Builders Inc. - r/w 581" Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 033
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
9. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1379, Page 1009
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
10. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams , and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April ,2001.
Attes Barton, CCller,
By: �2tr�„ ✓ /i �rLl�
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
32
By
Caroline D. Ginn
Chairman
Cot) Statutory Warranty Deed
J R/W - 58`° Avenue &
0 Tax ID #20333900001015000001.0
1�
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED $ Ig 0 D
NOTES
JEFFREY K. RARTOII. CLERK
INDIAN RNER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
1/01(deed \58ave) mnBk
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO.. FLA,
THIS INDENTURE, made this � day of Jq vt LL& yr ✓1 , 2001, between LAUREL
BUILDERS, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Florida, the address of which is Post Office Box 2062, Vero Beach, FL 32961, GRANTOR,
and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address
of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Twenty -Seven Thousand Dollars
($27,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to
the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land,
situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against
the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign (,-,c
Witness
printed name:
�-Vujxe>b
a sign: L U01/
4tl . nUM
c g Witness
O printed name:G((LlaSh�,,,
1: #STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
v) �.
S c q to OThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �Y day of yt,�� �✓
c o o Eby Dee Ellen Robinson as Vice P ent "of LA�JREL —BU R ERS, INC.,
fl corporation, on behalf of same. S/He is personally known to m or
m
as *dentificatl
Its Vice President
% Notary Public:
4ZZ) stamped seal with printed
�COMMil ion
April 3, 2001
33
2001,
a Florida
produced
8j
17 P6 72 1
r\
u
C:
0
O
Cot) Statutory Warranty Deed
J R/W - 58`° Avenue &
0 Tax ID #20333900001015000001.0
1�
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED $ Ig 0 D
NOTES
JEFFREY K. RARTOII. CLERK
INDIAN RNER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
1/01(deed \58ave) mnBk
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO.. FLA,
THIS INDENTURE, made this � day of Jq vt LL& yr ✓1 , 2001, between LAUREL
BUILDERS, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Florida, the address of which is Post Office Box 2062, Vero Beach, FL 32961, GRANTOR,
and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address
of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Twenty -Seven Thousand Dollars
($27,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to
the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land,
situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against
the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign (,-,c
Witness
printed name:
�-Vujxe>b
a sign: L U01/
4tl . nUM
c g Witness
O printed name:G((LlaSh�,,,
1: #STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
v) �.
S c q to OThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �Y day of yt,�� �✓
c o o Eby Dee Ellen Robinson as Vice P ent "of LA�JREL —BU R ERS, INC.,
fl corporation, on behalf of same. S/He is personally known to m or
m
as *dentificatl
Its Vice President
% Notary Public:
4ZZ) stamped seal with printed
�COMMil ion
April 3, 2001
33
2001,
a Florida
produced
8j
17 P6 72 1
r\
u
C:
0
O
Cot) Statutory Warranty Deed
J R/W - 58`° Avenue &
0 Tax ID #20333900001015000001.0
1�
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED $ Ig 0 D
NOTES
JEFFREY K. RARTOII. CLERK
INDIAN RNER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
1/01(deed \58ave) mnBk
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO.. FLA,
THIS INDENTURE, made this � day of Jq vt LL& yr ✓1 , 2001, between LAUREL
BUILDERS, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Florida, the address of which is Post Office Box 2062, Vero Beach, FL 32961, GRANTOR,
and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address
of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Twenty -Seven Thousand Dollars
($27,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to
the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land,
situate, lying, and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against
the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign (,-,c
Witness
printed name:
�-Vujxe>b
a sign: L U01/
4tl . nUM
c g Witness
O printed name:G((LlaSh�,,,
1: #STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
v) �.
S c q to OThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �Y day of yt,�� �✓
c o o Eby Dee Ellen Robinson as Vice P ent "of LA�JREL —BU R ERS, INC.,
fl corporation, on behalf of same. S/He is personally known to m or
m
as *dentificatl
Its Vice President
% Notary Public:
4ZZ) stamped seal with printed
�COMMil ion
April 3, 2001
33
2001,
a Florida
produced
8j
17 P6 72 1
r\
u
C:
0
O
. � —
N m n S
o�
(S N N
JD
' A
m cn n
0 q 0
orbco3
o u
<� l
(b to
o C cn
CD A
`c
p 0
S ,o
�
a
r
A
o
L4
tD
N
A
�
rn
F
0
a 17.
3cnn
^� S
t0 A O 0
� � n n
O N
M 0 D
n�<
o . o
nsri3
1
c ?�S
N N 0 n
c
o m o-
�oN.
� n
o SN n
N N 7�
_7
o
TN
D 3 O
Ka 3
CL
v ° 0
a N3c
,
3 aa
N
n
� a
o3�
30
N (D
O0 -. N
7 O N
OL o
- '
O O >
dN o
N C -
N
O A c
N z
OL
O 0
N � �
n•
or O O
nen
CL o.
7 S O
o -u
o :3
Q) n (A
�n n
C-) C o.
�o
O 0 D
O O
7 n
ds 0
-TI n
o
�n�
CL»
0
ACOkD OWG. FILE: 58w55w.OwG
April 3, 2001
58TH AVENUE (KING'S HIGHWAY)
E X H I B A
Section Line
Plotted 4-5-00
/
PG 722
34
30'
cb
n
j
j
05
0
O
O
vwo o
o �
nz�
-
oo�^
O
F
(1 N
NO
O
Ln
N R
go�''�
54
S�\�
Ln
cn
A t„(
?
n
A
� m
j
Qp
N
N
n (p
D
n 0 O
C
<
N
O.
(D
n 0 7 ?
o e
CL
n
�
Ln CD M
'o0
n 0
0
K
= O
Nn? v'
f
O N 0
O
O S
cna�7Uo�
0
00.
F'L�
cn
o
n
0 o _
C :T
3
N -
- N
�C)TD0
C
600
03,87
to
m�
(b 0
o
o' o
m O
CL
� S
S0 y
CL
_
O
0
L l
D 0
O N
o ::r o
N p (D
n
ACOkD OWG. FILE: 58w55w.OwG
April 3, 2001
58TH AVENUE (KING'S HIGHWAY)
E X H I B A
Section Line
Plotted 4-5-00
/
PG 722
34
30'
cb
n
j
j
05
0
O
O
. � —
N m n S
o�
(S N N
JD
' A
m cn n
0 q 0
orbco3
o u
<� l
(b to
o C cn
CD A
`c
p 0
S ,o
�
a
r
A
o
L4
tD
N
A
�
rn
F
0
a 17.
3cnn
^� S
t0 A O 0
� � n n
O N
M 0 D
n�<
o . o
nsri3
1
c ?�S
N N 0 n
c
o m o-
�oN.
� n
o SN n
N N 7�
_7
o
TN
D 3 O
Ka 3
CL
v ° 0
a N3c
,
3 aa
N
n
� a
o3�
30
N (D
O0 -. N
7 O N
OL o
- '
O O >
dN o
N C -
N
O A c
N z
OL
O 0
N � �
n•
or O O
nen
CL o.
7 S O
o -u
o :3
Q) n (A
�n n
C-) C o.
�o
O 0 D
O O
7 n
ds 0
-TI n
o
�n�
CL»
0
ACOkD OWG. FILE: 58w55w.OwG
April 3, 2001
58TH AVENUE (KING'S HIGHWAY)
E X H I B A
Section Line
Plotted 4-5-00
/
PG 722
34
30'
cb
n
j
j
05
0
O
O
vwo o
o �
nz�
-
oo�^
O
F
(1 N
NO
O
Ln
N R
go�''�
54
S�\�
Ln
cn
A t„(
?
n
A
� m
j
Qp
N
N
n (p
D
n 0 O
C
<
N
O.
(D
n 0 7 ?
o e
CL
n
�
Ln CD M
'o0
n 0
0
K
= O
Nn? v'
f
O N 0
O
O S
cna�7Uo�
0
00.
F'L�
cn
o
n
0 o _
C :T
3
N -
- N
�C)TD0
C
600
03,87
to
m�
(b 0
o
o' o
m O
CL
� S
S0 y
CL
_
O
0
L l
D 0
O N
o ::r o
N p (D
n
ACOkD OWG. FILE: 58w55w.OwG
April 3, 2001
58TH AVENUE (KING'S HIGHWAY)
E X H I B A
Section Line
Plotted 4-5-00
/
PG 722
34
30'
cb
n
j
j
05
0
O
O
. � —
N m n S
o�
(S N N
JD
' A
m cn n
0 q 0
orbco3
o u
<� l
(b to
o C cn
CD A
`c
p 0
S ,o
�
a
r
A
o
L4
tD
N
A
�
rn
F
0
a 17.
3cnn
^� S
t0 A O 0
� � n n
O N
M 0 D
n�<
o . o
nsri3
1
c ?�S
N N 0 n
c
o m o-
�oN.
� n
o SN n
N N 7�
_7
o
TN
D 3 O
Ka 3
CL
v ° 0
a N3c
,
3 aa
N
n
� a
o3�
30
N (D
O0 -. N
7 O N
OL o
- '
O O >
dN o
N C -
N
O A c
N z
OL
O 0
N � �
n•
or O O
nen
CL o.
7 S O
o -u
o :3
Q) n (A
�n n
C-) C o.
�o
O 0 D
O O
7 n
ds 0
-TI n
o
�n�
CL»
0
ACOkD OWG. FILE: 58w55w.OwG
April 3, 2001
58TH AVENUE (KING'S HIGHWAY)
E X H I B A
Section Line
Plotted 4-5-00
/
PG 722
34
30'
cb
n
j
j
05
0
O
O
vwo o
o �
nz�
-
oo�^
O
F
(1 N
NO
O
Ln
N R
go�''�
54
S�\�
Ln
cn
A t„(
?
n
A
� m
j
Qp
N
N
n (p
D
n 0 O
C
<
N
O.
(D
n 0 7 ?
o e
CL
n
�
Ln CD M
'o0
n 0
0
K
= O
Nn? v'
f
O N 0
O
O S
cna�7Uo�
0
00.
F'L�
cn
o
n
0 o _
C :T
3
N -
- N
�C)TD0
C
600
03,87
to
m�
(b 0
o
o' o
m O
CL
� S
S0 y
CL
_
O
0
L l
D 0
O N
o ::r o
N p (D
n
ACOkD OWG. FILE: 58w55w.OwG
April 3, 2001
58TH AVENUE (KING'S HIGHWAY)
E X H I B A
Section Line
Plotted 4-5-00
/
PG 722
34
30'
cb
n
j
j
05
0
O
O
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-034 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Hyatt Fruit
Company - r/w 43rd Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -034
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
11. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1381, Page 2577
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
12. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
Deputy Clerk J
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D. Ginn �—
Chairman
35 B1( i 17 FG 7 2 3
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-034 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Hyatt Fruit
Company - r/w 43rd Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -034
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
11. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1381, Page 2577
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
12. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
Deputy Clerk J
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D. Ginn �—
Chairman
35 B1( i 17 FG 7 2 3
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-034 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Hyatt Fruit
Company - r/w 43rd Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -034
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
11. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1381, Page 2577
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
12. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbri dge and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
April 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
Deputy Clerk J
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D. Ginn �—
Chairman
35 B1( i 17 FG 7 2 3
Statutory Warranty Deed 12/00(deed\OSLO)kRC
R/W - 43rd Avenue
I O (�� Tax 1D #10-33-39-00001-0130-00003.1
IN THE
JEFFREY K.
CLERK CIRCUIT COU;iT
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA. r\
C.; -
THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , 200J., between 6
HYATT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, whose address is Post a
Office Box 639, Vero Beach, FL 32961, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, apolitical subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
Ing
rZ47
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and
valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S
heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River
County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign..ww�A,
WiWks
printed n e:
sign: �1 `�O`t.X
Witness
printed name: (?,/�jZ�
HYATT FRUIT COMPANY
By 2; jjjW A40 JVIW
Thomas R. Jones, President
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
200 / by Thomas R. Jones, President of HYATT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida
corporation, on behalf of same. He is personally known to me erpredtsecd
as identification.
Notary Public:
stamped seal with printed
name and Commission X
4z/
d.c- A41�
April 3, 2001
i P' 7 2 t;
36
.11
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED i `�O
JEFFREY K. BARTON* OLERK
NIDUUI RIVER COUNTY
Ree
-v
N
Cn
Statutory Warranty Deed 12/00(deed\OSLO)kRC
R/W - 43rd Avenue
I O (�� Tax 1D #10-33-39-00001-0130-00003.1
IN THE
JEFFREY K.
CLERK CIRCUIT COU;iT
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA. r\
C.; -
THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , 200J., between 6
HYATT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, whose address is Post a
Office Box 639, Vero Beach, FL 32961, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, apolitical subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
Ing
rZ47
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and
valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S
heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River
County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign..ww�A,
WiWks
printed n e:
sign: �1 `�O`t.X
Witness
printed name: (?,/�jZ�
HYATT FRUIT COMPANY
By 2; jjjW A40 JVIW
Thomas R. Jones, President
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
200 / by Thomas R. Jones, President of HYATT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida
corporation, on behalf of same. He is personally known to me erpredtsecd
as identification.
Notary Public:
stamped seal with printed
name and Commission X
4z/
d.c- A41�
April 3, 2001
i P' 7 2 t;
36
.11
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED i `�O
JEFFREY K. BARTON* OLERK
NIDUUI RIVER COUNTY
Ree
-v
N
Cn
Statutory Warranty Deed 12/00(deed\OSLO)kRC
R/W - 43rd Avenue
I O (�� Tax 1D #10-33-39-00001-0130-00003.1
IN THE
JEFFREY K.
CLERK CIRCUIT COU;iT
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA. r\
C.; -
THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , 200J., between 6
HYATT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, whose address is Post a
Office Box 639, Vero Beach, FL 32961, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, apolitical subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
Ing
rZ47
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and
valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S
heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying, and being in Indian River
County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of:
sign..ww�A,
WiWks
printed n e:
sign: �1 `�O`t.X
Witness
printed name: (?,/�jZ�
HYATT FRUIT COMPANY
By 2; jjjW A40 JVIW
Thomas R. Jones, President
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
200 / by Thomas R. Jones, President of HYATT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida
corporation, on behalf of same. He is personally known to me erpredtsecd
as identification.
Notary Public:
stamped seal with printed
name and Commission X
4z/
d.c- A41�
April 3, 2001
i P' 7 2 t;
36
.11
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED i `�O
JEFFREY K. BARTON* OLERK
NIDUUI RIVER COUNTY
Ree
-v
N
Cn
Lr OD O S
CL
O;O Q p
�(
CTIN N
Q) L
CIO Ln n
Onp
0e03
l- 0 rD
rn Cn
O
<
a7C
N O
C) CD
n � p
S
0
0
CD
m
m
0
0
0 O =
om
N
�
N
C T O
0-1
rr D
RI N
C
27
Z
m 0
m m
X (n
Z0
C) M
m O
Z
m
d T m ° C
1 m 0CD
3 c 0 0 �
0 0 r 3 3
°
I o a °- S
❑ CD ❑ CP)D .�. CD �< 3 O O
np --1 n ❑
< D I O `n �n O 0D O S
mc 0
zoznz'�n Z 3 rn° 0 sCn
0 ° o Cn`< d M o 0
asa3
❑ ❑ (D O CO - CD
m
CnO
rn ❑ 0 CD 17 ° ❑ _� CD •-
C m ❑ 7
❑ S (D S
_ CD
CD Cn n O M C)0 n 0 T o to Cn
7 ❑
CD p O O)
S _T N O
n ❑
S p t❑ �S C„
C) (D CD CD
p p i CD
N 3 U O 0
X03 allo
? 7' p ❑ OWN _5
�3 S
N C C S O O
3 ❑- p rn c,4
CD -i CD W o
CD (D c N
n3� 0-�0s
r 0 = c
� 0- n 0-
_
C) ° ? O
03�
3 O O ;a0
Tai
CD
p _ (n ❑_ CD LO
:3 C) N 0 0 0
a -o
p CD ] O - O
Q- U) o
cnc — 3 ms
-0 N N p CD
o m C °
En
`<
a�.(D
In
C)�❑ c
L
C
�a
0 �❑
❑�
C') ^�
CD
❑ °
rnC)
n (D
0 -
v Cp 0
0 ❑
°o
r
m
c�
D
r
M
(n
X W
0 50
Z
J
-ine Tract 14
10'
0
r
�
O
N
CO
o
a
I I I I
O
x
0
0
CD
m
m
0
0
0 O =
om
N
�
N
C T O
0-1
rr D
RI N
C
27
Z
m 0
m m
X (n
Z0
C) M
m O
Z
m
d T m ° C
1 m 0CD
3 c 0 0 �
0 0 r 3 3
°
I o a °- S
❑ CD ❑ CP)D .�. CD �< 3 O O
np --1 n ❑
< D I O `n �n O 0D O S
mc 0
zoznz'�n Z 3 rn° 0 sCn
0 ° o Cn`< d M o 0
asa3
❑ ❑ (D O CO - CD
m
CnO
rn ❑ 0 CD 17 ° ❑ _� CD •-
C m ❑ 7
❑ S (D S
_ CD
CD Cn n O M C)0 n 0 T o to Cn
7 ❑
CD p O O)
S _T N O
n ❑
S p t❑ �S C„
C) (D CD CD
p p i CD
N 3 U O 0
X03 allo
? 7' p ❑ OWN _5
�3 S
N C C S O O
3 ❑- p rn c,4
CD -i CD W o
CD (D c N
n3� 0-�0s
r 0 = c
� 0- n 0-
_
C) ° ? O
03�
3 O O ;a0
Tai
CD
p _ (n ❑_ CD LO
:3 C) N 0 0 0
a -o
p CD ] O - O
Q- U) o
cnc — 3 ms
-0 N N p CD
o m C °
En
`<
a�.(D
In
C)�❑ c
L
C
�a
0 �❑
❑�
C') ^�
CD
❑ °
rnC)
n (D
0 -
v Cp 0
0 ❑
°o
r
m
c�
D
r
M
(n
X W
0 50
Z
J
-ine Tract 14
10'
0
0
o
a
I I I I
x
EXHI
B
l J
p
rf
LTJ
sn�
_
I I I I
EXHI
B
%�1`
I
�.
p
.� r
9
ACAD DWG. FILE: OSLOSEC20.DWG Plotted 1 1 -29-00
April 3, 2001
37
of I 17 Pb 725
Lr OD O S
CL
O;O Q p
�(
CTIN N
Q) L
CIO Ln n
Onp
0e03
l- 0 rD
rn Cn
O
<
a7C
N O
C) CD
n � p
S
0
0
CD
m
m
0
0
0 O =
om
N
�
N
C T O
0-1
rr D
RI N
C
27
Z
m 0
m m
X (n
Z0
C) M
m O
Z
m
d T m ° C
1 m 0CD
3 c 0 0 �
0 0 r 3 3
°
I o a °- S
❑ CD ❑ CP)D .�. CD �< 3 O O
np --1 n ❑
< D I O `n �n O 0D O S
mc 0
zoznz'�n Z 3 rn° 0 sCn
0 ° o Cn`< d M o 0
asa3
❑ ❑ (D O CO - CD
m
CnO
rn ❑ 0 CD 17 ° ❑ _� CD •-
C m ❑ 7
❑ S (D S
_ CD
CD Cn n O M C)0 n 0 T o to Cn
7 ❑
CD p O O)
S _T N O
n ❑
S p t❑ �S C„
C) (D CD CD
p p i CD
N 3 U O 0
X03 allo
? 7' p ❑ OWN _5
�3 S
N C C S O O
3 ❑- p rn c,4
CD -i CD W o
CD (D c N
n3� 0-�0s
r 0 = c
� 0- n 0-
_
C) ° ? O
03�
3 O O ;a0
Tai
CD
p _ (n ❑_ CD LO
:3 C) N 0 0 0
a -o
p CD ] O - O
Q- U) o
cnc — 3 ms
-0 N N p CD
o m C °
En
`<
a�.(D
In
C)�❑ c
L
C
�a
0 �❑
❑�
C') ^�
CD
❑ °
rnC)
n (D
0 -
v Cp 0
0 ❑
°o
r
m
c�
D
r
M
(n
X W
0 50
Z
J
-ine Tract 14
10'
0
r
�
O
N
CO
o
a
I I I I
O
x
0
0
CD
m
m
0
0
0 O =
om
N
�
N
C T O
0-1
rr D
RI N
C
27
Z
m 0
m m
X (n
Z0
C) M
m O
Z
m
d T m ° C
1 m 0CD
3 c 0 0 �
0 0 r 3 3
°
I o a °- S
❑ CD ❑ CP)D .�. CD �< 3 O O
np --1 n ❑
< D I O `n �n O 0D O S
mc 0
zoznz'�n Z 3 rn° 0 sCn
0 ° o Cn`< d M o 0
asa3
❑ ❑ (D O CO - CD
m
CnO
rn ❑ 0 CD 17 ° ❑ _� CD •-
C m ❑ 7
❑ S (D S
_ CD
CD Cn n O M C)0 n 0 T o to Cn
7 ❑
CD p O O)
S _T N O
n ❑
S p t❑ �S C„
C) (D CD CD
p p i CD
N 3 U O 0
X03 allo
? 7' p ❑ OWN _5
�3 S
N C C S O O
3 ❑- p rn c,4
CD -i CD W o
CD (D c N
n3� 0-�0s
r 0 = c
� 0- n 0-
_
C) ° ? O
03�
3 O O ;a0
Tai
CD
p _ (n ❑_ CD LO
:3 C) N 0 0 0
a -o
p CD ] O - O
Q- U) o
cnc — 3 ms
-0 N N p CD
o m C °
En
`<
a�.(D
In
C)�❑ c
L
C
�a
0 �❑
❑�
C') ^�
CD
❑ °
rnC)
n (D
0 -
v Cp 0
0 ❑
°o
r
m
c�
D
r
M
(n
X W
0 50
Z
J
-ine Tract 14
10'
0
0
o
a
I I I I
x
EXHI
B
l J
p
rf
LTJ
sn�
_
I I I I
EXHI
B
%�1`
I
�.
p
.� r
9
ACAD DWG. FILE: OSLOSEC20.DWG Plotted 1 1 -29-00
April 3, 2001
37
of I 17 Pb 725
Lr OD O S
CL
O;O Q p
�(
CTIN N
Q) L
CIO Ln n
Onp
0e03
l- 0 rD
rn Cn
O
<
a7C
N O
C) CD
n � p
S
0
0
CD
m
m
0
0
0 O =
om
N
�
N
C T O
0-1
rr D
RI N
C
27
Z
m 0
m m
X (n
Z0
C) M
m O
Z
m
d T m ° C
1 m 0CD
3 c 0 0 �
0 0 r 3 3
°
I o a °- S
❑ CD ❑ CP)D .�. CD �< 3 O O
np --1 n ❑
< D I O `n �n O 0D O S
mc 0
zoznz'�n Z 3 rn° 0 sCn
0 ° o Cn`< d M o 0
asa3
❑ ❑ (D O CO - CD
m
CnO
rn ❑ 0 CD 17 ° ❑ _� CD •-
C m ❑ 7
❑ S (D S
_ CD
CD Cn n O M C)0 n 0 T o to Cn
7 ❑
CD p O O)
S _T N O
n ❑
S p t❑ �S C„
C) (D CD CD
p p i CD
N 3 U O 0
X03 allo
? 7' p ❑ OWN _5
�3 S
N C C S O O
3 ❑- p rn c,4
CD -i CD W o
CD (D c N
n3� 0-�0s
r 0 = c
� 0- n 0-
_
C) ° ? O
03�
3 O O ;a0
Tai
CD
p _ (n ❑_ CD LO
:3 C) N 0 0 0
a -o
p CD ] O - O
Q- U) o
cnc — 3 ms
-0 N N p CD
o m C °
En
`<
a�.(D
In
C)�❑ c
L
C
�a
0 �❑
❑�
C') ^�
CD
❑ °
rnC)
n (D
0 -
v Cp 0
0 ❑
°o
r
m
c�
D
r
M
(n
X W
0 50
Z
J
-ine Tract 14
10'
0
r
�
O
N
CO
o
a
I I I I
O
x
0
0
CD
m
m
0
0
0 O =
om
N
�
N
C T O
0-1
rr D
RI N
C
27
Z
m 0
m m
X (n
Z0
C) M
m O
Z
m
d T m ° C
1 m 0CD
3 c 0 0 �
0 0 r 3 3
°
I o a °- S
❑ CD ❑ CP)D .�. CD �< 3 O O
np --1 n ❑
< D I O `n �n O 0D O S
mc 0
zoznz'�n Z 3 rn° 0 sCn
0 ° o Cn`< d M o 0
asa3
❑ ❑ (D O CO - CD
m
CnO
rn ❑ 0 CD 17 ° ❑ _� CD •-
C m ❑ 7
❑ S (D S
_ CD
CD Cn n O M C)0 n 0 T o to Cn
7 ❑
CD p O O)
S _T N O
n ❑
S p t❑ �S C„
C) (D CD CD
p p i CD
N 3 U O 0
X03 allo
? 7' p ❑ OWN _5
�3 S
N C C S O O
3 ❑- p rn c,4
CD -i CD W o
CD (D c N
n3� 0-�0s
r 0 = c
� 0- n 0-
_
C) ° ? O
03�
3 O O ;a0
Tai
CD
p _ (n ❑_ CD LO
:3 C) N 0 0 0
a -o
p CD ] O - O
Q- U) o
cnc — 3 ms
-0 N N p CD
o m C °
En
`<
a�.(D
In
C)�❑ c
L
C
�a
0 �❑
❑�
C') ^�
CD
❑ °
rnC)
n (D
0 -
v Cp 0
0 ❑
°o
r
m
c�
D
r
M
(n
X W
0 50
Z
J
-ine Tract 14
10'
0
0
o
a
I I I I
x
EXHI
B
l J
p
rf
LTJ
sn�
_
I I I I
EXHI
B
%�1`
I
�.
p
.� r
9
ACAD DWG. FILE: OSLOSEC20.DWG Plotted 1 1 -29-00
April 3, 2001
37
of I 17 Pb 725
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-035 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Lake Grace
of Vero Beach - r/w 58" Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 035
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
13. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1383, Page 901 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
14. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge
the vote was as follows: and, upon being put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Aori 1 , 2001.
Atters Barton. Clerk
Deputy Clerk (J
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
38
B FG 726
By
Caroline D. Ginn
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-035 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Lake Grace
of Vero Beach - r/w 58" Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 035
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
13. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1383, Page 901 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
14. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge
the vote was as follows: and, upon being put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Aori 1 , 2001.
Atters Barton. Clerk
Deputy Clerk (J
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
38
B FG 726
By
Caroline D. Ginn
Chairman
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-035 canceling taxes upon publicly -owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Lake Grace
of Vero Beach - r/w 58" Avenue)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 035
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.289 FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
13. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1383, Page 901 which
was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby canceled,
pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
14. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanbridge
the vote was as follows: and, upon being put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Aori 1 , 2001.
Atters Barton. Clerk
Deputy Clerk (J
April 3, 2001
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
38
B FG 726
By
Caroline D. Ginn
Chairman
�J
Statutory `v'arranty Deed
R/W - 58' (bcc 1/2/1)
Tax ID #17-33-39-00001-0010-00001.0
9=$,R7 a.
JEFFREY OW", EtERR
MOM RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
2/ ]deed\kk-MN
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA,
THIS INDENTURE, made this 13 day of Feb. , 2001, between LAKE GRACE OF
VERO BEACH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, whose address is 740 Oleander
Street, Boca Raton, FL 33486, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Thirty -Nine Thousand Seven Hundred
Ninety -Nine Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the
GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying,
and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF"
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in
printed n�a e: /A. /�,/�Oc Trow
sign: `
Witness
printed name: jjf�lzl�141,9 z (JiG kl ZFJZ
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
LAKE GRACE OF VERO BEACH,
LLC
By
Harold F. Overby
Manager -Member
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /3 day of 2E4LvpK.y 2001, by
Harold F. Overby, Manager Member of LAKE GRACE OF VERO BEACH, -LLC, a Florida
limited liability corporation. on behalf of same. He is personally know to uced
as identification.
Notary Public: sign
4:
stamped seal with printed
name and Comm % ion N
April 3, 2001
..17m, ilUe IL
'i.
on
. ].
39
6K i i FG 727
PC
U
U
C.�
0
T
rn
t�
N
rm
W
Co
w
CD
l.0
CD
�J
Statutory `v'arranty Deed
R/W - 58' (bcc 1/2/1)
Tax ID #17-33-39-00001-0010-00001.0
9=$,R7 a.
JEFFREY OW", EtERR
MOM RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
2/ ]deed\kk-MN
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA,
THIS INDENTURE, made this 13 day of Feb. , 2001, between LAKE GRACE OF
VERO BEACH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, whose address is 740 Oleander
Street, Boca Raton, FL 33486, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Thirty -Nine Thousand Seven Hundred
Ninety -Nine Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the
GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying,
and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF"
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in
printed n�a e: /A. /�,/�Oc Trow
sign: `
Witness
printed name: jjf�lzl�141,9 z (JiG kl ZFJZ
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
LAKE GRACE OF VERO BEACH,
LLC
By
Harold F. Overby
Manager -Member
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /3 day of 2E4LvpK.y 2001, by
Harold F. Overby, Manager Member of LAKE GRACE OF VERO BEACH, -LLC, a Florida
limited liability corporation. on behalf of same. He is personally know to uced
as identification.
Notary Public: sign
4:
stamped seal with printed
name and Comm % ion N
April 3, 2001
..17m, ilUe IL
'i.
on
. ].
39
6K i i FG 727
PC
U
U
C.�
0
T
rn
t�
N
rm
W
Co
w
CD
l.0
CD
�J
Statutory `v'arranty Deed
R/W - 58' (bcc 1/2/1)
Tax ID #17-33-39-00001-0010-00001.0
9=$,R7 a.
JEFFREY OW", EtERR
MOM RIVER COUNTY
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
2/ ]deed\kk-MN
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA,
THIS INDENTURE, made this 13 day of Feb. , 2001, between LAKE GRACE OF
VERO BEACH, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, whose address is 740 Oleander
Street, Boca Raton, FL 33486, GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960,
GRANTEE,
WITNESSETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Thirty -Nine Thousand Seven Hundred
Ninety -Nine Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by
GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the
GRANTEE, and GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying,
and being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF"
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to the land, and will defend the same against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in
printed n�a e: /A. /�,/�Oc Trow
sign: `
Witness
printed name: jjf�lzl�141,9 z (JiG kl ZFJZ
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
LAKE GRACE OF VERO BEACH,
LLC
By
Harold F. Overby
Manager -Member
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /3 day of 2E4LvpK.y 2001, by
Harold F. Overby, Manager Member of LAKE GRACE OF VERO BEACH, -LLC, a Florida
limited liability corporation. on behalf of same. He is personally know to uced
as identification.
Notary Public: sign
4:
stamped seal with printed
name and Comm % ion N
April 3, 2001
..17m, ilUe IL
'i.
on
. ].
39
6K i i FG 727
PC
U
U
C.�
0
T
rn
t�
N
rm
W
Co
w
CD
l.0
CD
April 3, 2001
13.381S 1-119
d7U17 uO.'Pa5
.9L oe
O
to
m
m
�
O
07
O
N
N
W-1
Z
O
ff
a_
a'
U
W
W
O
�i
L D
v
7 �
O p
U�U
a;
"l
� T
O c
c
L Q
cc
C U
c
_ N
O
V>
,
vcr
(n
c
o Q o
'0'0
v c
\- Q
L
W T
Z _
C
C1 O 7
L N O
C
O O .v �
u
v v 7 C
W pV)_T
Z _ C
Y O O
L a oL)
o o u
vV >
v C la:v
q) CP
0
D n D -6
o c
_ v c
o — L
w
C c C
N _ p >
L of
C N N
p Y V
u Q` Q
u o
`
00- to
N
vrn O c
3nm o
N v O C
L — O
C
I— aU
O
ct C
oma 'MI i I -GS :31U OMG af7v-
l
EX H I B I T 11 A 11
40
B
/20P
v�1
Or.0
N � E
7
�„Q
t — O
c p
L u
0
OV V L
O
c
O oU
N
vc
V N
u
-Q_
o - o
T
>yU
7 O C
lnL.-
ac
cD
J o Z
u
O c to
W
C_0
O /n
` h
rn O
Cl
O 7 D
d N
O
D v :
O
N _v
�Eu
- c
o TL
E E�
O N
_aE^
o7E�
L c Q
Tom Q
= E L U
v�—
u a 0
T 3 J
v
u VE
L ED O
_-
N N _
L Y L c
N V O
EE
0 c
vQL
L — �
N O L U
vO�
OO >.?
u N
= O u._
a
O
a
EP
O�
v
�
O
T
aN
T
c
�1QE)
E
7
o
U
v
Q
.?
?
c
O
O
L
U
c
�
EP
April 3, 2001
13.381S 1-119
d7U17 uO.'Pa5
.9L oe
O
to
m
m
�
O
07
O
N
N
W-1
Z
O
ff
a_
a'
U
W
W
O
�i
L D
v
7 �
O p
U�U
a;
"l
� T
O c
c
L Q
cc
C U
c
_ N
O
V>
,
vcr
(n
c
o Q o
'0'0
v c
\- Q
L
W T
Z _
C
C1 O 7
L N O
C
O O .v �
u
v v 7 C
W pV)_T
Z _ C
Y O O
L a oL)
o o u
vV >
v C la:v
q) CP
0
D n D -6
o c
_ v c
o — L
w
C c C
N _ p >
L of
C N N
p Y V
u Q` Q
u o
`
00- to
N
vrn O c
3nm o
N v O C
L — O
C
I— aU
O
ct C
oma 'MI i I -GS :31U OMG af7v-
l
EX H I B I T 11 A 11
40
B
/20P
v�1
Or.0
N � E
7
�„Q
t — O
c p
L u
0
OV V L
O
c
O oU
N
vc
V N
u
-Q_
o - o
T
>yU
7 O C
lnL.-
ac
cD
J o Z
u
O c to
W
C_0
O /n
` h
rn O
Cl
O 7 D
d N
O
D v :
O
N _v
�Eu
- c
o TL
E E�
O N
_aE^
o7E�
L c Q
Tom Q
= E L U
v�—
u a 0
T 3 J
v
u VE
L ED O
_-
N N _
L Y L c
N V O
EE
0 c
vQL
L — �
N O L U
vO�
OO >.?
u N
= O u._
a
O
a
EP
O�
v
�
O
T
aN
T
c
�1QE)
E
7
o
U
v
Q
.?
?
c
O
O
L
U
c
�
EP
April 3, 2001
13.381S 1-119
d7U17 uO.'Pa5
.9L oe
O
to
m
m
�
O
07
O
N
N
W-1
Z
O
ff
a_
a'
U
W
W
O
�i
L D
v
7 �
O p
U�U
a;
"l
� T
O c
c
L Q
cc
C U
c
_ N
O
V>
,
vcr
(n
c
o Q o
'0'0
v c
\- Q
L
W T
Z _
C
C1 O 7
L N O
C
O O .v �
u
v v 7 C
W pV)_T
Z _ C
Y O O
L a oL)
o o u
vV >
v C la:v
q) CP
0
D n D -6
o c
_ v c
o — L
w
C c C
N _ p >
L of
C N N
p Y V
u Q` Q
u o
`
00- to
N
vrn O c
3nm o
N v O C
L — O
C
I— aU
O
ct C
oma 'MI i I -GS :31U OMG af7v-
l
EX H I B I T 11 A 11
40
B
/20P
v�1
Or.0
N � E
7
�„Q
t — O
c p
L u
0
OV V L
O
c
O oU
N
vc
V N
u
-Q_
o - o
T
>yU
7 O C
lnL.-
ac
cD
J o Z
u
O c to
W
C_0
O /n
` h
rn O
Cl
O 7 D
d N
O
D v :
O
N _v
�Eu
- c
o TL
E E�
O N
_aE^
o7E�
L c Q
Tom Q
= E L U
v�—
u a 0
T 3 J
v
u VE
L ED O
_-
N N _
L Y L c
N V O
EE
0 c
vQL
L — �
N O L U
vO�
OO >.?
u N
= O u._
a
O
a
EP
O�
v
�
O
T
aN
T
c
�1QE)
E
7
o
U
v
Q
.?
?
c
O
O
L
U
c
�
EP
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-036 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Bechtold -
r/w 5`h Street SW)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 26
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
15. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1383, Page 2839
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
16. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Stanbri ing and, upon and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner
the vote was as follows: - P g put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Aye
Commissioner John W. Ti
PPin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri_ � 1 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk.
By
Deputy Clerk
Ca
roline D. Ginn
Chairman
April 3, 2001
41
BES I 1 - 729
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-036 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Bechtold -
r/w 5`h Street SW)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 26
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
15. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1383, Page 2839
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
16. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Stanbri ing and, upon and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner
the vote was as follows: - P g put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Aye
Commissioner John W. Ti
PPin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri_ � 1 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk.
By
Deputy Clerk
Ca
roline D. Ginn
Chairman
April 3, 2001
41
BES I 1 - 729
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-036 canceling taxes upon publicly owned
lands, pursuant to Section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Bechtold -
r/w 5`h Street SW)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 26
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CANCELING TAXES UPON PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 196.28, FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, Section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of County Commissioners
of each County to cancel and discharge any and all liens for taxes, delinquent or current, held or
owned by the county or the state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by
any agency, governmental subdivision, or municipality of the state, or the United States, for road
purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly describing such lands and
setting forth the public use to which the same are or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution, proper officials of the
county and of the state are authorized, empowered, and directed to make proper entries upon the
records to accomplish such cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions
of Section 196.28, F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
15. The property described on attached Exhibit "A" is hereby accepted and any and all liens for
taxes, delinquent or current, against the property described in OR Book 1383, Page 2839
which was recently acquired by Indian River County for future right of way are hereby
canceled, pursuant to the authority of Section 196.28, F.S.
16. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby directed to send a certified copy
of this resolution to the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Stanbri ing and, upon and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner
the vote was as follows: - P g put to a vote,
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Aye
Commissioner John W. Ti
PPin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
Apri_ � 1 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk.
By
Deputy Clerk
Ca
roline D. Ginn
Chairman
April 3, 2001
41
BES I 1 - 729
qv
Statutory Warranty Deed — 5'" Street SW
Tax ID #21-33-39-00001-0080-00005.0
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
216/00(deed)MNk
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED So20
NOTE=
JEFFREY K. BARTON* CLERK
INDIM RIVER COUNTY
THIS INDENTURE, made this o' day of J2Z i s
2001, between
GERALD L, BECHTOLD, a married man*, whose address is 4350 Fifth
Street, SW, Vero Beach, FL 329689 GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which
is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WI TN ES SETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS and other good
and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and
GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying, and
being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
*Grantor states the above-described property is not
now and never has
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the tieen �
title to the land, tand will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of.
sign: rim �/ %4!t ;
Witness
printed name:(i{ /lap 4 G A^�aP' Cr
sign: R. wzu�
Witness
Printed name: 4&R/0
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
Gerald4. ..
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � � day of L' ' (4'1c
2001, by GERALD L. BECHTOLD, and he is personally known to me or produc d
-��t'-- " `— AAt"( �6 C4 as identification.
printed name & Commission #
G�
L._'a do �z�2nt was rrept%rAd
s � y
TT ^y
April 3, 2001
Pf7 0
42
sign: JAL
Notary Public
A
SAN SANDRA L.WRIGHTMY COMMISSION • CC 9271;72 EXPIRES: M.y 30, 2001Hy FL Notuy Sa &BwWMq, k�
qv
Statutory Warranty Deed — 5'" Street SW
Tax ID #21-33-39-00001-0080-00005.0
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
216/00(deed)MNk
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED So20
NOTE=
JEFFREY K. BARTON* CLERK
INDIM RIVER COUNTY
THIS INDENTURE, made this o' day of J2Z i s
2001, between
GERALD L, BECHTOLD, a married man*, whose address is 4350 Fifth
Street, SW, Vero Beach, FL 329689 GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which
is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WI TN ES SETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS and other good
and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and
GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying, and
being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
*Grantor states the above-described property is not
now and never has
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the tieen �
title to the land, tand will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of.
sign: rim �/ %4!t ;
Witness
printed name:(i{ /lap 4 G A^�aP' Cr
sign: R. wzu�
Witness
Printed name: 4&R/0
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
Gerald4. ..
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � � day of L' ' (4'1c
2001, by GERALD L. BECHTOLD, and he is personally known to me or produc d
-��t'-- " `— AAt"( �6 C4 as identification.
printed name & Commission #
G�
L._'a do �z�2nt was prept%rAd
s � y
TT ^y
April 3, 2001
Pf7 0
42
sign: JAL
Notary Public
A
SAN SANDRA L.WRIGHTMY COMMISSION • CC 9271;72 EXPIRES: M.y 30, 2001Hy FL Notuy Sa &BwWMq, k�
qv
Statutory Warranty Deed — 5'" Street SW
Tax ID #21-33-39-00001-0080-00005.0
IN THE RECORDS OF
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA.
216/00(deed)MNk
DOCUMENTARY STAMPS
DEED So20
NOTE=
JEFFREY K. BARTON* CLERK
INDIM RIVER COUNTY
THIS INDENTURE, made this o' day of J2Z i s
2001, between
GERALD L, BECHTOLD, a married man*, whose address is 4350 Fifth
Street, SW, Vero Beach, FL 329689 GRANTOR, and INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which
is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, GRANTEE,
WI TN ES SETH:
That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS and other good
and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the GRANTEE, and
GRANTEE'S heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying, and
being in Indian River County, Florida:
EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
*Grantor states the above-described property is not
now and never has
GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the tieen �
title to the land, tand will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
Signed in the presence of.
sign: rim �/ %4!t ;
Witness
printed name:(i{ /lap 4 G A^�aP' Cr
sign: R. wzu�
Witness
Printed name: 4&R/0
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
Gerald4. ..
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � � day of L' ' (4'1c
2001, by GERALD L. BECHTOLD, and he is personally known to me or produc d
-��t'-- " `— AAt"( �6 C4 as identification.
printed name & Commission #
G�
L._'a do �z�2nt was prept%rAd
s � y
TT ^y
April 3, 2001
Pf7 0
42
sign: JAL
Notary Public
A
SAN SANDRA L.WRIGHTMY COMMISSION • CC 9271;72 EXPIRES: M.y 30, 2001Hy FL Notuy Sa &BwWMq, k�
co
L O -L l- t Pollold
'S-2614. n
EE XEH 18 IT
I
(POo8 X00 sxt4d �J
au1� �0oJ1 au"I u0 40as
.Z'09Z
3nN3Ad
Dat � to
N .
.NII U330 .IHd�If1W
PI
4D
8 }DDJ1
Dy 79'O L 03 1D aui� am
,X
vl
-09 OW
8l •09Z
0 a�
t
.td `
yln C
010cr 'V y
03p v-.�= c 0 o J v>
C) o�
Z .0 +, N O O Q-0 p N _• Q C
0 .... 0 (n Lf) U— C C) (n N O
`Owo�m`(3) Oc
o_ y�,r7�-Ct ca° o -
U (o0tp y0"o U) co
N Or. O Q_ o �� Q v-0vi -a
W t` �zW o N o
zoo Oa) N _
O OIC 0
Z o e 0 3 O oo U O LY W •C
o
a� aeaa,c 0 �� o,C o cCCnm �� o; >
t 7 i C� Com,= C C O C
W F- OO U^ O O � O-QO oZ
CJI (nom ONS °zl0a a UU 0
April 3, 2001
43
YJ29 .
� OMCI'MS9 3113 -OmC] Q
Vov
v Z
o 0)
ci I� U
rn<
C U Z
Q)
^ v UU 0 W
W N O L d O
J a°o v Z
0 3^
.J
^
�
4
(1
°
U
.
_ U_
N
Dy 79'O L 03 1D aui� am
,X
vl
-09 OW
8l •09Z
0 a�
t
.td `
yln C
010cr 'V y
03p v-.�= c 0 o J v>
C) o�
Z .0 +, N O O Q-0 p N _• Q C
0 .... 0 (n Lf) U— C C) (n N O
`Owo�m`(3) Oc
o_ y�,r7�-Ct ca° o -
U (o0tp y0"o U) co
N Or. O Q_ o �� Q v-0vi -a
W t` �zW o N o
zoo Oa) N _
O OIC 0
Z o e 0 3 O oo U O LY W •C
o
a� aeaa,c 0 �� o,C o cCCnm �� o; >
t 7 i C� Com,= C C O C
W F- OO U^ O O � O-QO oZ
CJI (nom ONS °zl0a a UU 0
April 3, 2001
43
YJ29 .
� OMCI'MS9 3113 -OmC] Q
Vov
v Z
o 0)
ci I� U
rn<
C U Z
Q)
^ v UU 0 W
W N O L d O
J a°o v Z
0 3^
FC0)
_C
J
_ o
,oc :z Q)
U C
0 J
Ln
U
O O
i w O
v " t
CL U
p
O L C
OC p d
� � N
� V O
�a
c�
ocn�
U O C
M U U
V N N
` Ea 0
� � C
E U
Y
Q)
c71-0
��
vC
p CN
O •-
-O.c qT
O.72 i
0 E Q
_ (V a
_ NL
po
.. t
°3cnU
t
�L O
TU p Can
)L CCL�
a O� 0
U V •"
> L Y C
N O
Q)
L C
cU O 0 O \
C :9 L
O 0
+
0
w a)
Q O CJ .�
U
C) � O
7- o v (n
O NL'c O
t ` E
U . 'D
— Q
SK 1 17 PG 7 3 1
0
0
W
CJ„
"D
ca�)
N
co
O
°
^
�
V
�
°
c
.
_ U_
N
O
ao
a
FC0)
_C
J
_ o
,oc :z Q)
U C
0 J
Ln
U
O O
i w O
v " t
CL U
p
O L C
OC p d
� � N
� V O
�a
c�
ocn�
U O C
M U U
V N N
` Ea 0
� � C
E U
Y
Q)
c71-0
��
vC
p CN
O •-
-O.c qT
O.72 i
0 E Q
_ (V a
_ NL
po
.. t
°3cnU
t
�L O
TU p Can
)L CCL�
a O� 0
U V •"
> L Y C
N O
Q)
L C
cU O 0 O \
C :9 L
O 0
+
0
w a)
Q O CJ .�
U
C) � O
7- o v (n
O NL'c O
t ` E
U . 'D
— Q
SK 1 17 PG 7 3 1
0
0
W
CJ„
"D
ca�)
N
co
O
co
L O -L l- t Pollold
'S-2614. n
EE XEH 18 IT
I
(POo8 X00 sxt4d �J
au1� �0oJ1 au"I u0 40as
.Z'09Z
3nN3Ad
Dat � to
N .
.NII U330 .IHd�If1W
PI
4D
8 }DDJ1
Dy 79'O L 03 1D aui� am
,X
vl
-09 OW
8l •09Z
0 a�
t
.td `
yln C
010cr 'V y
03p v-.�= c 0 o J v>
C) o�
Z .0 +, N O O Q-0 p N _• Q C
0 .... 0 (n Lf) U— C C) (n N O
`Owo�m`(3) Oc
o_ y�,r7�-Ct ca° o -
U (o0tp y0"o U) co
N Or. O Q_ o �� Q v-0vi -a
W t` �zW o N o
zoo Oa) N _
O OIC 0
Z o e 0 3 O oo U O LY W •C
o
a� aeaa,c 0 �� o,C o cCCnm �� o; >
t 7 i C� Com,= C C O C
W F- OO U^ O O � O-QO oZ
CJI (nom ONS °zl0a a UU 0
April 3, 2001
43
YJ29 .
� OMCI'MS9 3113 -OmC] Q
Vov
v Z
o 0)
ci I� U
rn<
C U Z
Q)
^ v UU 0 W
W N O L d O
J a°o v Z
0 3^
.J
^
�
4
(1
°
U
.
_ U_
N
Dy 79'O L 03 1D aui� am
,X
vl
-09 OW
8l •09Z
0 a�
t
.td `
yln C
010cr 'V y
03p v-.�= c 0 o J v>
C) o�
Z .0 +, N O O Q-0 p N _• Q C
0 .... 0 (n Lf) U— C C) (n N O
`Owo�m`(3) Oc
o_ y�,r7�-Ct ca° o -
U (o0tp y0"o U) co
N Or. O Q_ o �� Q v-0vi -a
W t` �zW o N o
zoo Oa) N _
O OIC 0
Z o e 0 3 O oo U O LY W •C
o
a� aeaa,c 0 �� o,C o cCCnm �� o; >
t 7 i C� Com,= C C O C
W F- OO U^ O O � O-QO oZ
CJI (nom ONS °zl0a a UU 0
April 3, 2001
43
YJ29 .
� OMCI'MS9 3113 -OmC] Q
Vov
v Z
o 0)
ci I� U
rn<
C U Z
Q)
^ v UU 0 W
W N O L d O
J a°o v Z
0 3^
FC0)
_C
J
_ o
,oc :z Q)
U C
0 J
Ln
U
O O
i w O
v " t
CL U
p
O L C
OC p d
� � N
� V O
�a
c�
ocn�
U O C
M U U
V N N
` Ea 0
� � C
E U
Y
Q)
c71-0
��
vC
p CN
O •-
-O.c qT
O.72 i
0 E Q
_ (V a
_ NL
po
.. t
°3cnU
t
�L O
TU p Can
)L CCL�
a O� 0
U V •"
> L Y C
N O
Q)
L C
cU O 0 O \
C :9 L
O 0
+
0
w a)
Q O CJ .�
U
C) � O
7- o v (n
O NL'c O
t ` E
U . 'D
— Q
SK 1 17 PG 7 3 1
0
0
W
CJ„
"D
ca�)
N
co
O
°
^
�
V
�
°
c
.
_ U_
N
O
ao
a
FC0)
_C
J
_ o
,oc :z Q)
U C
0 J
Ln
U
O O
i w O
v " t
CL U
p
O L C
OC p d
� � N
� V O
�a
c�
ocn�
U O C
M U U
V N N
` Ea 0
� � C
E U
Y
Q)
c71-0
��
vC
p CN
O •-
-O.c qT
O.72 i
0 E Q
_ (V a
_ NL
po
.. t
°3cnU
t
�L O
TU p Can
)L CCL�
a O� 0
U V •"
> L Y C
N O
Q)
L C
cU O 0 O \
C :9 L
O 0
+
0
w a)
Q O CJ .�
U
C) � O
7- o v (n
O NL'c O
t ` E
U . 'D
— Q
SK 1 17 PG 7 3 1
0
0
W
CJ„
"D
ca�)
N
co
O
co
L O -L l- t Pollold
'S-2614. n
EE XEH 18 IT
I
(POo8 X00 sxt4d �J
au1� �0oJ1 au"I u0 40as
.Z'09Z
3nN3Ad
Dat � to
N .
.NII U330 .IHd�If1W
PI
4D
8 }DDJ1
Dy 79'O L 03 1D aui� am
,X
vl
-09 OW
8l •09Z
0 a�
t
.td `
yln C
010cr 'V y
03p v-.�= c 0 o J v>
C) o�
Z .0 +, N O O Q-0 p N _• Q C
0 .... 0 (n Lf) U— C C) (n N O
`Owo�m`(3) Oc
o_ y�,r7�-Ct ca° o -
U (o0tp y0"o U) co
N Or. O Q_ o �� Q v-0vi -a
W t` �zW o N o
zoo Oa) N _
O OIC 0
Z o e 0 3 O oo U O LY W •C
o
a� aeaa,c 0 �� o,C o cCCnm �� o; >
t 7 i C� Com,= C C O C
W F- OO U^ O O � O-QO oZ
CJI (nom ONS °zl0a a UU 0
April 3, 2001
43
YJ29 .
� OMCI'MS9 3113 -OmC] Q
Vov
v Z
o 0)
ci I� U
rn<
C U Z
Q)
^ v UU 0 W
W N O L d O
J a°o v Z
0 3^
.J
^
�
4
(1
°
U
.
_ U_
N
Dy 79'O L 03 1D aui� am
,X
vl
-09 OW
8l •09Z
0 a�
t
.td `
yln C
010cr 'V y
03p v-.�= c 0 o J v>
C) o�
Z .0 +, N O O Q-0 p N _• Q C
0 .... 0 (n Lf) U— C C) (n N O
`Owo�m`(3) Oc
o_ y�,r7�-Ct ca° o -
U (o0tp y0"o U) co
N Or. O Q_ o �� Q v-0vi -a
W t` �zW o N o
zoo Oa) N _
O OIC 0
Z o e 0 3 O oo U O LY W •C
o
a� aeaa,c 0 �� o,C o cCCnm �� o; >
t 7 i C� Com,= C C O C
W F- OO U^ O O � O-QO oZ
CJI (nom ONS °zl0a a UU 0
April 3, 2001
43
YJ29 .
� OMCI'MS9 3113 -OmC] Q
Vov
v Z
o 0)
ci I� U
rn<
C U Z
Q)
^ v UU 0 W
W N O L d O
J a°o v Z
0 3^
FC0)
_C
J
_ o
,oc :z Q)
U C
0 J
Ln
U
O O
i w O
v " t
CL U
p
O L C
OC p d
� � N
� V O
�a
c�
ocn�
U O C
M U U
V N N
` Ea 0
� � C
E U
Y
Q)
c71-0
��
vC
p CN
O •-
-O.c qT
O.72 i
0 E Q
_ (V a
_ NL
po
.. t
°3cnU
t
�L O
TU p Can
)L CCL�
a O� 0
U V •"
> L Y C
N O
Q)
L C
cU O 0 O \
C :9 L
O 0
+
0
w a)
Q O CJ .�
U
C) � O
7- o v (n
O NL'c O
t ` E
U . 'D
— Q
SK 1 17 PG 7 3 1
0
0
W
CJ„
"D
ca�)
N
co
O
°
^
�
V
�
°
c
.
_ U_
N
O
ao
a
FC0)
_C
J
_ o
,oc :z Q)
U C
0 J
Ln
U
O O
i w O
v " t
CL U
p
O L C
OC p d
� � N
� V O
�a
c�
ocn�
U O C
M U U
V N N
` Ea 0
� � C
E U
Y
Q)
c71-0
��
vC
p CN
O •-
-O.c qT
O.72 i
0 E Q
_ (V a
_ NL
po
.. t
°3cnU
t
�L O
TU p Can
)L CCL�
a O� 0
U V •"
> L Y C
N O
Q)
L C
cU O 0 O \
C :9 L
O 0
+
0
w a)
Q O CJ .�
U
C) � O
7- o v (n
O NL'c O
t ` E
U . 'D
— Q
SK 1 17 PG 7 3 1
0
0
W
CJ„
"D
ca�)
N
co
O
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRU: Joseph Baird, Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager -
DATE: March 21, 2001
SUBJECT: Request for Consent Agenda; Renewal Application for Workers'
Compensation Managed Care Network
Please consider the following information item for inclusion on the April 3, 2001 Board of
County Commissioners' agenda.
On February 21, 1997, the State of Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration (ANCA)
authorized the County's workers' compensation managed care network through CorVel
Corporation in keeping with section 440.134, Florida Statutes. As a self-insured public
entity, we are required to have a managed care network, and CorVel has performed well.
CorVel works well with County staff and JLT Insurance Services, third party claims
administrator, to provide a cost-effective, efficient medical care provider network for injured
employees. Annually, the application must be resubmitted with a renewal fee of $1,000.00
to ARCA.
Staff requests that the Board approve this renewal application and authorize payment of
the renewal fee.
April 3, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
renewal application and authorized payment of the renewal fee
in the amount of $1,000 to AHCA (State of Florida Agency for
Healthcare Administration), as requested in the memorandum.
$ G 732
44
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRU: Joseph Baird, Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager -
DATE: March 21, 2001
SUBJECT: Request for Consent Agenda; Renewal Application for Workers'
Compensation Managed Care Network
Please consider the following information item for inclusion on the April 3, 2001 Board of
County Commissioners' agenda.
On February 21, 1997, the State of Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration (ANCA)
authorized the County's workers' compensation managed care network through CorVel
Corporation in keeping with section 440.134, Florida Statutes. As a self-insured public
entity, we are required to have a managed care network, and CorVel has performed well.
CorVel works well with County staff and JLT Insurance Services, third party claims
administrator, to provide a cost-effective, efficient medical care provider network for injured
employees. Annually, the application must be resubmitted with a renewal fee of $1,000.00
to ARCA.
Staff requests that the Board approve this renewal application and authorize payment of
the renewal fee.
April 3, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
renewal application and authorized payment of the renewal fee
in the amount of $1,000 to AHCA (State of Florida Agency for
Healthcare Administration), as requested in the memorandum.
$ G 732
44
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRU: Joseph Baird, Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager -
DATE: March 21, 2001
SUBJECT: Request for Consent Agenda; Renewal Application for Workers'
Compensation Managed Care Network
Please consider the following information item for inclusion on the April 3, 2001 Board of
County Commissioners' agenda.
On February 21, 1997, the State of Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration (ANCA)
authorized the County's workers' compensation managed care network through CorVel
Corporation in keeping with section 440.134, Florida Statutes. As a self-insured public
entity, we are required to have a managed care network, and CorVel has performed well.
CorVel works well with County staff and JLT Insurance Services, third party claims
administrator, to provide a cost-effective, efficient medical care provider network for injured
employees. Annually, the application must be resubmitted with a renewal fee of $1,000.00
to ARCA.
Staff requests that the Board approve this renewal application and authorize payment of
the renewal fee.
April 3, 2001
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
renewal application and authorized payment of the renewal fee
in the amount of $1,000 to AHCA (State of Florida Agency for
Healthcare Administration), as requested in the memorandum.
$ G 732
44
(Plorida GrAoP"uy"i,lr P_ T,....1 n__ _
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 27,2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Community Development Dire
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois. AICP /
Chief. Environmental Planning
DATE: March 27, 2001
RE: Approval of Change Order to Contract to Revise Completion Date: Summerlin 's Seven
Seas, Inc. Construction of a Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing at the Oslo
Riverfront Conservation Area
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3. 2001.
On November 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners approved a contract with Summerlin 4s Seven
Seas, Inc., to construct a ground -level boardwalk and ditch crossing at the Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area
(ORCA). The construction work, to cost 55,000, is being funded partially by a 52.400 grant that the Countv
has already received from the Florida Greenways and Trails program. The remainder is to be paid from the
County's native upland mitigation account (# 127-000-343-071.00).
The approved contract (see attached "Addendum 2 to Agreement") contained a typographic error, indicating
a required completion date January 8. 2000, instead of the intended date of January 8, 2001. In addition, the
original intended completion date has since past due to scheduling issues on the part of staff (and less so on
the part of the contractor).
Staff is requesting the that Board approve the attached "Change Order No. 1 " to the contract agreement to
revise the completion date to May 31, 2001.
The proposed revision to the completion date will have no effect on cost or availability of funds as approved
by the Board under the original contract.
Staff recently conducted a field meeting with the contractor to assess field conditions and to verify the
specific location of the —60' long ground -level boardwalk and —12' long ditch crossing. Based on that
meeting, the contractor has indicated that once the notice the proceed is issued, construction will be
completed in a short period of time, within the revised time frame as proposed herein.
April 3, 2001
45
B9 1 17 PG 7 3 3
(Plorida GrAoP"uy"i,lr P_ T,....1 n__ _
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 27,2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Community Development Dire
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois. AICP /
Chief. Environmental Planning
DATE: March 27, 2001
RE: Approval of Change Order to Contract to Revise Completion Date: Summerlin 's Seven
Seas, Inc. Construction of a Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing at the Oslo
Riverfront Conservation Area
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3. 2001.
On November 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners approved a contract with Summerlin 4s Seven
Seas, Inc., to construct a ground -level boardwalk and ditch crossing at the Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area
(ORCA). The construction work, to cost 55,000, is being funded partially by a 52.400 grant that the Countv
has already received from the Florida Greenways and Trails program. The remainder is to be paid from the
County's native upland mitigation account (# 127-000-343-071.00).
The approved contract (see attached "Addendum 2 to Agreement") contained a typographic error, indicating
a required completion date January 8. 2000, instead of the intended date of January 8, 2001. In addition, the
original intended completion date has since past due to scheduling issues on the part of staff (and less so on
the part of the contractor).
Staff is requesting the that Board approve the attached "Change Order No. 1 " to the contract agreement to
revise the completion date to May 31, 2001.
The proposed revision to the completion date will have no effect on cost or availability of funds as approved
by the Board under the original contract.
Staff recently conducted a field meeting with the contractor to assess field conditions and to verify the
specific location of the —60' long ground -level boardwalk and —12' long ditch crossing. Based on that
meeting, the contractor has indicated that once the notice the proceed is issued, construction will be
completed in a short period of time, within the revised time frame as proposed herein.
April 3, 2001
45
B9 1 17 PG 7 3 3
(Plorida GrAoP"uy"i,lr P_ T,....1 n__ _
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 27,2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Community Development Dire
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois. AICP /
Chief. Environmental Planning
DATE: March 27, 2001
RE: Approval of Change Order to Contract to Revise Completion Date: Summerlin 's Seven
Seas, Inc. Construction of a Ground -Level Boardwalk and Ditch Crossing at the Oslo
Riverfront Conservation Area
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3. 2001.
On November 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners approved a contract with Summerlin 4s Seven
Seas, Inc., to construct a ground -level boardwalk and ditch crossing at the Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area
(ORCA). The construction work, to cost 55,000, is being funded partially by a 52.400 grant that the Countv
has already received from the Florida Greenways and Trails program. The remainder is to be paid from the
County's native upland mitigation account (# 127-000-343-071.00).
The approved contract (see attached "Addendum 2 to Agreement") contained a typographic error, indicating
a required completion date January 8. 2000, instead of the intended date of January 8, 2001. In addition, the
original intended completion date has since past due to scheduling issues on the part of staff (and less so on
the part of the contractor).
Staff is requesting the that Board approve the attached "Change Order No. 1 " to the contract agreement to
revise the completion date to May 31, 2001.
The proposed revision to the completion date will have no effect on cost or availability of funds as approved
by the Board under the original contract.
Staff recently conducted a field meeting with the contractor to assess field conditions and to verify the
specific location of the —60' long ground -level boardwalk and —12' long ditch crossing. Based on that
meeting, the contractor has indicated that once the notice the proceed is issued, construction will be
completed in a short period of time, within the revised time frame as proposed herein.
April 3, 2001
45
B9 1 17 PG 7 3 3
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached "Change Order No. 1 it to
"Addendum 2 to Agreement," and authonze the Board Chairman to execute said document.
ATTACHMFNTS
1. Proposed "Change Order No. I."
2• Copy of "Addendum 2 to Agreement" between Indian River County and Summerlin's Seven Seas,
Inc. (minus attachments)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Change Order No. 1 to Addendum 2 to Agreement
with Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc., and authorized the
Chairman to execute the same, as recommended in the
memorandum.
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 6, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Mark Zans
Planner II, Current Development
April 3, 2001
46
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached "Change Order No. 1 it to
"Addendum 2 to Agreement," and authonze the Board Chairman to execute said document.
ATTACHMFNTS
1. Proposed "Change Order No. I."
2• Copy of "Addendum 2 to Agreement" between Indian River County and Summerlin's Seven Seas,
Inc. (minus attachments)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Change Order No. 1 to Addendum 2 to Agreement
with Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc., and authorized the
Chairman to execute the same, as recommended in the
memorandum.
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 6, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Mark Zans
Planner II, Current Development
April 3, 2001
46
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached "Change Order No. 1 it to
"Addendum 2 to Agreement," and authonze the Board Chairman to execute said document.
ATTACHMFNTS
1. Proposed "Change Order No. I."
2• Copy of "Addendum 2 to Agreement" between Indian River County and Summerlin's Seven Seas,
Inc. (minus attachments)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Change Order No. 1 to Addendum 2 to Agreement
with Summerlin's Seven Seas, Inc., and authorized the
Chairman to execute the same, as recommended in the
memorandum.
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 6, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Mark Zans
Planner II, Current Development
April 3, 2001
46
DATE: March 6 , 2001
SUBJECT: Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. Request for
Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf Club PD
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
Red Stick Golf Club PD final plat is a boundary plat of a 313.5 acre parcel located on the west
side of the Florida East Coast Railroad tracks, south of County Road 510 and north of 77`h Street.
The zoning for the site is PD (Planned Development), which allows for golf course and club
uses on the site. Because the Red Stick project is a P.D., final plat approval is required to
complete the project.
At its April 8, 1999 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary PD
plat. The applicants, Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. through
its agents Masteller, Mohler, and Reed, Inc., are now requesting final plat approval ana have
submitted a final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat.
This is a boundary plat only and conforms to the approved preliminary PD plat and project PD
site plan. All required improvements are controlled by the approved PD site plan and are
complete. No other criteria or requirements of the subdivision process apply to
this project. Therefore, all applicable PD final plat requirements are satisified.
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for the Red Stick Golf Club PD plat.
FWV4 6 X, lei me 1311
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Plat Graphic
April 3, 2001
47
�
ON 1 �' 6
DATE: March 6 , 2001
SUBJECT: Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. Request for
Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf Club PD
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
Red Stick Golf Club PD final plat is a boundary plat of a 313.5 acre parcel located on the west
side of the Florida East Coast Railroad tracks, south of County Road 510 and north of 77`h Street.
The zoning for the site is PD (Planned Development), which allows for golf course and club
uses on the site. Because the Red Stick project is a P.D., final plat approval is required to
complete the project.
At its April 8, 1999 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary PD
plat. The applicants, Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. through
its agents Masteller, Mohler, and Reed, Inc., are now requesting final plat approval ana have
submitted a final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat.
This is a boundary plat only and conforms to the approved preliminary PD plat and project PD
site plan. All required improvements are controlled by the approved PD site plan and are
complete. No other criteria or requirements of the subdivision process apply to
this project. Therefore, all applicable PD final plat requirements are satisified.
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for the Red Stick Golf Club PD plat.
FWV4 6 X, lei me 1311
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Plat Graphic
April 3, 2001
47
�
ON 1 �' 6
DATE: March 6 , 2001
SUBJECT: Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. Request for
Final Plat Approval for Red Stick Golf Club PD
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
Red Stick Golf Club PD final plat is a boundary plat of a 313.5 acre parcel located on the west
side of the Florida East Coast Railroad tracks, south of County Road 510 and north of 77`h Street.
The zoning for the site is PD (Planned Development), which allows for golf course and club
uses on the site. Because the Red Stick project is a P.D., final plat approval is required to
complete the project.
At its April 8, 1999 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the preliminary PD
plat. The applicants, Red Stick Golf Club, Inc. and Red Stick Golf Investments, Ltd. through
its agents Masteller, Mohler, and Reed, Inc., are now requesting final plat approval ana have
submitted a final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat.
This is a boundary plat only and conforms to the approved preliminary PD plat and project PD
site plan. All required improvements are controlled by the approved PD site plan and are
complete. No other criteria or requirements of the subdivision process apply to
this project. Therefore, all applicable PD final plat requirements are satisified.
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for the Red Stick Golf Club PD plat.
FWV4 6 X, lei me 1311
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Plat Graphic
April 3, 2001
47
�
ON 1 �' 6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Red Stick Golf Club PD plat, as recommended
in the memorandum.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 28, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
ert M. Keating, Al P
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeB1o.;,�P
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: March 28, 2001
SUBJECT: Approval of Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs Statement:
Cost -Share Purchase of the Andre Parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Environmental
Land Acquisition Project
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners. at a public hearing on November 7. 2000, approved county purchase
of the ± 90.61 acre Simmons and Andre parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh project using environmental
land bond funds. Closing of the purchase occurred on March 15, 2001, with 50% cost -share funding from
the Florida Communities Trust (FCT). `
Prior to closing, on February 20, 2001, the Board approved two "Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project
Costs" statements. one each for the Simmons and Andre parcels. The statements provided a breakdown of
acquisition costs, and details concerning the cost -share amount that the County receives from the FCT for
the purchases.
April 3, 2001
48
BK 1 l PG 7 33 6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Red Stick Golf Club PD plat, as recommended
in the memorandum.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 28, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
ert M. Keating, Al P
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeB1o.;,�P
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: March 28, 2001
SUBJECT: Approval of Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs Statement:
Cost -Share Purchase of the Andre Parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Environmental
Land Acquisition Project
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners. at a public hearing on November 7. 2000, approved county purchase
of the ± 90.61 acre Simmons and Andre parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh project using environmental
land bond funds. Closing of the purchase occurred on March 15, 2001, with 50% cost -share funding from
the Florida Communities Trust (FCT). `
Prior to closing, on February 20, 2001, the Board approved two "Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project
Costs" statements. one each for the Simmons and Andre parcels. The statements provided a breakdown of
acquisition costs, and details concerning the cost -share amount that the County receives from the FCT for
the purchases.
April 3, 2001
48
BK 1 l PG 7 33 6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Red Stick Golf Club PD plat, as recommended
in the memorandum.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 28, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
ert M. Keating, Al P
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeB1o.;,�P
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: March 28, 2001
SUBJECT: Approval of Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs Statement:
Cost -Share Purchase of the Andre Parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh Environmental
Land Acquisition Project
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners. at a public hearing on November 7. 2000, approved county purchase
of the ± 90.61 acre Simmons and Andre parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh project using environmental
land bond funds. Closing of the purchase occurred on March 15, 2001, with 50% cost -share funding from
the Florida Communities Trust (FCT). `
Prior to closing, on February 20, 2001, the Board approved two "Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project
Costs" statements. one each for the Simmons and Andre parcels. The statements provided a breakdown of
acquisition costs, and details concerning the cost -share amount that the County receives from the FCT for
the purchases.
April 3, 2001
48
BK 1 l PG 7 33 6
ZM.
Inadvertently, the reconciliation statement for the Andre parcel(s) did not include certain attomev fees ($500)
associated with closing. Also, an unanticipated survey revision (5600) was necessary for closing that did not
come to light until after the original reconciliation statement was approved.
Attached, for the Board's approval consideration, is an "Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total
Project Costs" statement pertaining to the Andre parcels, to account for the referenced costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached "Amended Purchaser's
Reconciliation of Total Project Costs" statements and authonze the Board Chairman to execute the
document. Moreover, staff recommends that the Board authorize county staff to take actions as necessary
to finalize cost -share reimbursement with the FCT.
ATTACHMENTS,
1. Location map
'. Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs statement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project
Costs statements, authorized the Chairman to execute the same,
and authorized County staff to take actions as necessary to
finalize cost -share reimbursement with the Florida Communities
Trust, as recommended in the memorandum.
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 16, 2001:
April 3, 2001
sis
BX 117 PUG 737
ZM.
Inadvertently, the reconciliation statement for the Andre parcel(s) did not include certain attomev fees ($500)
associated with closing. Also, an unanticipated survey revision (5600) was necessary for closing that did not
come to light until after the original reconciliation statement was approved.
Attached, for the Board's approval consideration, is an "Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total
Project Costs" statement pertaining to the Andre parcels, to account for the referenced costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached "Amended Purchaser's
Reconciliation of Total Project Costs" statements and authonze the Board Chairman to execute the
document. Moreover, staff recommends that the Board authorize county staff to take actions as necessary
to finalize cost -share reimbursement with the FCT.
ATTACHMENTS,
1. Location map
'. Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs statement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project
Costs statements, authorized the Chairman to execute the same,
and authorized County staff to take actions as necessary to
finalize cost -share reimbursement with the Florida Communities
Trust, as recommended in the memorandum.
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 16, 2001:
April 3, 2001
sis
BX 117 PUG 737
ZM.
Inadvertently, the reconciliation statement for the Andre parcel(s) did not include certain attomev fees ($500)
associated with closing. Also, an unanticipated survey revision (5600) was necessary for closing that did not
come to light until after the original reconciliation statement was approved.
Attached, for the Board's approval consideration, is an "Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total
Project Costs" statement pertaining to the Andre parcels, to account for the referenced costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached "Amended Purchaser's
Reconciliation of Total Project Costs" statements and authonze the Board Chairman to execute the
document. Moreover, staff recommends that the Board authorize county staff to take actions as necessary
to finalize cost -share reimbursement with the FCT.
ATTACHMENTS,
1. Location map
'. Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project Costs statement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Amended Purchaser's Reconciliation of Total Project
Costs statements, authorized the Chairman to execute the same,
and authorized County staff to take actions as necessary to
finalize cost -share reimbursement with the Florida Communities
Trust, as recommended in the memorandum.
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 16, 2001:
April 3, 2001
sis
BX 117 PUG 737
a - -
DATE: March 16, 2001
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director
Donald Hubbs, Utility Services Director-,
FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager,
SUBJECT: Award Bid #3036 Purchase of eight (8) Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Tanks
Utilities Department / Water Production and Wastewater Treatment Department
BACKGROUND -
The Department of Utility Services has requested the purchase of eight (8) Sodium Hypochlorite Storage
Tanks. These tanks shall be used for a new Sodium Hypochlorite system, which will replace the Chlorine
system currently in use. The tanks shall be installed at the following locations: South County Reverse Osmosis
Plant, North County Reverse Osmosis Plant, West Regional Wastewater Plant, and North County Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specifications Requested by:
Replies:
BID TABULATION•
luid Logic Company, Inc.
Wantagh, NY
January 31, 2001 at 2:00 P.M.
January I I & 17, 2001
Forty -Five (45) Vendors
Nineteen (19) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
3000
5000
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 6200
Orlando, FL 3000
5000
Advanced Water Engineering
Indian Harbour Beach, FL
April 3, 2001
6200
3000
5000
50
r PH 7J8
N$71500.00
t Total Days A.R.O.
00 $ 45,600.00 45
$ 15,000.0000 $ 37,400.00
Grand Total $ 98,000.00
4 $ 11,716.09 $ 46,864.36 30.
2 $ 7,103.61 $ 14,207.22
2 $ 171242.75 $ 34,485.50
Grand Total $ 95,557.08
71790.00 $31,160.00E 31,160.00 ::jA$
6,315.00 $ 12,630.002,750.00 $ 25,500.00and Total $ 691290.00
a - -
DATE: March 16, 2001
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director
Donald Hubbs, Utility Services Director-,
FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager,
SUBJECT: Award Bid #3036 Purchase of eight (8) Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Tanks
Utilities Department / Water Production and Wastewater Treatment Department
BACKGROUND -
The Department of Utility Services has requested the purchase of eight (8) Sodium Hypochlorite Storage
Tanks. These tanks shall be used for a new Sodium Hypochlorite system, which will replace the Chlorine
system currently in use. The tanks shall be installed at the following locations: South County Reverse Osmosis
Plant, North County Reverse Osmosis Plant, West Regional Wastewater Plant, and North County Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specifications Requested by:
Replies:
BID TABULATION•
luid Logic Company, Inc.
Wantagh, NY
January 31, 2001 at 2:00 P.M.
January I I & 17, 2001
Forty -Five (45) Vendors
Nineteen (19) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
3000
5000
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 6200
Orlando, FL 3000
5000
Advanced Water Engineering
Indian Harbour Beach, FL
April 3, 2001
6200
3000
5000
50
r PH 7J8
N$71500.00
t Total Days A.R.O.
00 $ 45,600.00 45
$ 15,000.0000 $ 37,400.00
Grand Total $ 98,000.00
4 $ 11,716.09 $ 46,864.36 30.
2 $ 7,103.61 $ 14,207.22
2 $ 171242.75 $ 34,485.50
Grand Total $ 95,557.08
71790.00 $31,160.00E 31,160.00 ::jA$
6,315.00 $ 12,630.002,750.00 $ 25,500.00and Total $ 691290.00
a - -
DATE: March 16, 2001
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services Director
Donald Hubbs, Utility Services Director-,
FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager,
SUBJECT: Award Bid #3036 Purchase of eight (8) Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Tanks
Utilities Department / Water Production and Wastewater Treatment Department
BACKGROUND -
The Department of Utility Services has requested the purchase of eight (8) Sodium Hypochlorite Storage
Tanks. These tanks shall be used for a new Sodium Hypochlorite system, which will replace the Chlorine
system currently in use. The tanks shall be installed at the following locations: South County Reverse Osmosis
Plant, North County Reverse Osmosis Plant, West Regional Wastewater Plant, and North County Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specifications Requested by:
Replies:
BID TABULATION•
luid Logic Company, Inc.
Wantagh, NY
January 31, 2001 at 2:00 P.M.
January I I & 17, 2001
Forty -Five (45) Vendors
Nineteen (19) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
3000
5000
Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 6200
Orlando, FL 3000
5000
Advanced Water Engineering
Indian Harbour Beach, FL
April 3, 2001
6200
3000
5000
50
r PH 7J8
N$71500.00
t Total Days A.R.O.
00 $ 45,600.00 45
$ 15,000.0000 $ 37,400.00
Grand Total $ 98,000.00
4 $ 11,716.09 $ 46,864.36 30.
2 $ 7,103.61 $ 14,207.22
2 $ 171242.75 $ 34,485.50
Grand Total $ 95,557.08
71790.00 $31,160.00E 31,160.00 ::jA$
6,315.00 $ 12,630.002,750.00 $ 25,500.00and Total $ 691290.00
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMI\IENDATION:
$120, 000.00
595,557.08
472-000-169-438.00 North County WWTP Chlorine Tank:
472-000-169-498.00 North County RO Plant Chlorine Tank
472-000-169-499.00 South County RO Plant Chlorine Tank
472-000-169-500.00 West Regional WWTP Chlorine Tank
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Harrington fitdustrial Plastics Inc. as the most responsive and
responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. Although Harrington Industrial
Plastics, Inc. was not the lowest bidder, the Utilities Department Staff has found that the lowest bidder,
Advance Water Engineering, does not meet the required specifications for the Sodium Hypochlorite Storage
Tanks, see attached memo from Utilities Department,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#3036 to Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., in the total amount
of $95,557.08, as more fully recommended in the above
memorandum.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN AND IF RECEIVED
9.A.' PUBLIC HEARING
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
,'7
Assistant Administrator Baird reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
April 3, 2001
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
51 SK 117 PG 739
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMI\IENDATION:
$120, 000.00
595,557.08
472-000-169-438.00 North County WWTP Chlorine Tank:
472-000-169-498.00 North County RO Plant Chlorine Tank
472-000-169-499.00 South County RO Plant Chlorine Tank
472-000-169-500.00 West Regional WWTP Chlorine Tank
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Harrington fitdustrial Plastics Inc. as the most responsive and
responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. Although Harrington Industrial
Plastics, Inc. was not the lowest bidder, the Utilities Department Staff has found that the lowest bidder,
Advance Water Engineering, does not meet the required specifications for the Sodium Hypochlorite Storage
Tanks, see attached memo from Utilities Department,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#3036 to Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., in the total amount
of $95,557.08, as more fully recommended in the above
memorandum.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN AND IF RECEIVED
9.A.' PUBLIC HEARING
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
,'7
Assistant Administrator Baird reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
April 3, 2001
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
51 SK 117 PG 739
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMI\IENDATION:
$120, 000.00
595,557.08
472-000-169-438.00 North County WWTP Chlorine Tank:
472-000-169-498.00 North County RO Plant Chlorine Tank
472-000-169-499.00 South County RO Plant Chlorine Tank
472-000-169-500.00 West Regional WWTP Chlorine Tank
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Harrington fitdustrial Plastics Inc. as the most responsive and
responsible bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. Although Harrington Industrial
Plastics, Inc. was not the lowest bidder, the Utilities Department Staff has found that the lowest bidder,
Advance Water Engineering, does not meet the required specifications for the Sodium Hypochlorite Storage
Tanks, see attached memo from Utilities Department,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#3036 to Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc., in the total amount
of $95,557.08, as more fully recommended in the above
memorandum.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN AND IF RECEIVED
9.A.' PUBLIC HEARING
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
,'7
Assistant Administrator Baird reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
April 3, 2001
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
51 SK 117 PG 739
FROM:
Joseph
A.
Baird, Assistant County Administrato*
DATE:
March
21,
2001
SUBJECT: Reschedule Brisben Companies (Palms of Vero Beach) TEFRA
Hearing to April 10, 2001
At the meeting of March 6, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved holding the
TEFRA hearing on April 3, 2001 for Brisben Companies (The Palms at Vero) to issue
$1,500,000 in Industrial Revenue Bonds. The legal advertising requirements for a TEFRA
hearing were not met, therefore we will have to hold the TEFRA hearing on April 10 rather than
April 3, 2001.
Staff requests permission to hold the TEFRA hearing on April 10, 2001.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised that he had spoken with the developer in this
matter concerning the rescheduling and they will be here on April 10`h
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED By
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously rescheduled the
TEFRA public hearing for April 10, 2001,
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TIM TIMINSKY - LACK OF
UTILITIES TO VEGETABLE STAND IN SEBASTIAN KROEGEL
PRODUCE)
The Board reviewed a letter of March 28, 2001:
C•1p�i�fY ��•
847 t Avco
R�r iia III MIN
Fox 361 •, W9718
T5m TiminAy
11230 S. Indian River Dr.
Sdoastion Fl. 32938
April 3, 2001
52
March 28, 2001
FROM:
Joseph
A.
Baird, Assistant County Administrato*
DATE:
March
21,
2001
SUBJECT: Reschedule Brisben Companies (Palms of Vero Beach) TEFRA
Hearing to April 10, 2001
At the meeting of March 6, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved holding the
TEFRA hearing on April 3, 2001 for Brisben Companies (The Palms at Vero) to issue
$1,500,000 in Industrial Revenue Bonds. The legal advertising requirements for a TEFRA
hearing were not met, therefore we will have to hold the TEFRA hearing on April 10 rather than
April 3, 2001.
Staff requests permission to hold the TEFRA hearing on April 10, 2001.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised that he had spoken with the developer in this
matter concerning the rescheduling and they will be here on April 10`h
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED By
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously rescheduled the
TEFRA public hearing for April 10, 2001,
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TIM TIMINSKY - LACK OF
UTILITIES TO VEGETABLE STAND IN SEBASTIAN KROEGEL
PRODUCE)
The Board reviewed a letter of March 28, 2001:
C•1p�i�fY ��•
847 t Avco
R�r iia III MIN
Fox 361 •, W9718
T5m TiminAy
11230 S. Indian River Dr.
Sdoastion Fl. 32938
April 3, 2001
52
March 28, 2001
FROM:
Joseph
A.
Baird, Assistant County Administrato*
DATE:
March
21,
2001
SUBJECT: Reschedule Brisben Companies (Palms of Vero Beach) TEFRA
Hearing to April 10, 2001
At the meeting of March 6, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved holding the
TEFRA hearing on April 3, 2001 for Brisben Companies (The Palms at Vero) to issue
$1,500,000 in Industrial Revenue Bonds. The legal advertising requirements for a TEFRA
hearing were not met, therefore we will have to hold the TEFRA hearing on April 10 rather than
April 3, 2001.
Staff requests permission to hold the TEFRA hearing on April 10, 2001.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised that he had spoken with the developer in this
matter concerning the rescheduling and they will be here on April 10`h
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED By
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously rescheduled the
TEFRA public hearing for April 10, 2001,
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - TIM TIMINSKY - LACK OF
UTILITIES TO VEGETABLE STAND IN SEBASTIAN KROEGEL
PRODUCE)
The Board reviewed a letter of March 28, 2001:
C•1p�i�fY ��•
847 t Avco
R�r iia III MIN
Fox 361 •, W9718
T5m TiminAy
11230 S. Indian River Dr.
Sdoastion Fl. 32938
April 3, 2001
52
March 28, 2001
Dear Miss Gunter,
This tetter is ooncerning my %PegctabjC Rind Imalod at )12(H) S. U. S.1 in Scbestian. My Amid has no
utilities, no wetcr, no power, not even u lidme, because of the rt rctaictioac prod oa me by the county. 1 ncW to
discuss with the commission the situation and find a solution t nood power kyr refrigeration to conunue oporatiag
ray businen in a a gzamful nwncr.
Sinvezely,
Tim Tirai;nsky
Tim Timinsky, 11230 S. Indian River Drive, Sebastian, advised that he owns the
vegetable stand on the corner of Indian River Drive and US 1 in Sebastian. He asked for an
exception to the rule that restricts him from having utilities in his building. It has been
explained to him why he cannot, but he felt his business cannot survive without a phone and
two electrical power outlets; one outside the building for a refrigeration cooler and one inside
for a small cooler, radio, vacuum cleaner, and so forth. He specified that refrigeration is a
necessity to keep bacteria down and provide a premium product to his customers. He felt
everyone needed a telephone in their business. He also wanted a security light at night. If
allowed to have utilities, he will be happy to obey any restrictions placed upon him, such as
no cooking, packaging, and so forth. He knew laws are necessary, but felt there should be
exceptions, and he could see no downside to an exception. He thanked the Commissioners
in advance for their help.
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating explained Mr. Timinsky's
vegetable stand is in the unincorporated area where the property is zoned CG (General
Commercial). CG zoning allows certain types of temporary uses and permanent retail
facilities. Temporary uses, such as transient merchants, do not need to meet the strict criteria
for permanent use. They neither pay traffic impact fees, have a permanent building, have
paved parking or landscaping, nor are they permitted to connect to water and sewer. He
believed the general concept when the LDRs were established was to put more restrictions
on the temporary uses in order to give a level playing field and not give undue advantage to
temporary uses. Transient merchants are also allowed in the Agricultural District. There are
April 3, 2001
53
�It PG 74 1
Dear Miss Gunter,
This tetter is ooncerning my %PegctabjC Rind Imalod at )12(H) S. U. S.1 in Scbestian. My Amid has no
utilities, no wetcr, no power, not even u lidme, because of the rt rctaictioac prod oa me by the county. 1 ncW to
discuss with the commission the situation and find a solution t nood power kyr refrigeration to conunue oporatiag
ray businen in a a gzamful nwncr.
Sinvezely,
Tim Tirai;nsky
Tim Timinsky, 11230 S. Indian River Drive, Sebastian, advised that he owns the
vegetable stand on the corner of Indian River Drive and US 1 in Sebastian. He asked for an
exception to the rule that restricts him from having utilities in his building. It has been
explained to him why he cannot, but he felt his business cannot survive without a phone and
two electrical power outlets; one outside the building for a refrigeration cooler and one inside
for a small cooler, radio, vacuum cleaner, and so forth. He specified that refrigeration is a
necessity to keep bacteria down and provide a premium product to his customers. He felt
everyone needed a telephone in their business. He also wanted a security light at night. If
allowed to have utilities, he will be happy to obey any restrictions placed upon him, such as
no cooking, packaging, and so forth. He knew laws are necessary, but felt there should be
exceptions, and he could see no downside to an exception. He thanked the Commissioners
in advance for their help.
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating explained Mr. Timinsky's
vegetable stand is in the unincorporated area where the property is zoned CG (General
Commercial). CG zoning allows certain types of temporary uses and permanent retail
facilities. Temporary uses, such as transient merchants, do not need to meet the strict criteria
for permanent use. They neither pay traffic impact fees, have a permanent building, have
paved parking or landscaping, nor are they permitted to connect to water and sewer. He
believed the general concept when the LDRs were established was to put more restrictions
on the temporary uses in order to give a level playing field and not give undue advantage to
temporary uses. Transient merchants are also allowed in the Agricultural District. There are
April 3, 2001
53
�It PG 74 1
Dear Miss Gunter,
This tetter is ooncerning my %PegctabjC Rind Imalod at )12(H) S. U. S.1 in Scbestian. My Amid has no
utilities, no wetcr, no power, not even u lidme, because of the rt rctaictioac prod oa me by the county. 1 ncW to
discuss with the commission the situation and find a solution t nood power kyr refrigeration to conunue oporatiag
ray businen in a a gzamful nwncr.
Sinvezely,
Tim Tirai;nsky
Tim Timinsky, 11230 S. Indian River Drive, Sebastian, advised that he owns the
vegetable stand on the corner of Indian River Drive and US 1 in Sebastian. He asked for an
exception to the rule that restricts him from having utilities in his building. It has been
explained to him why he cannot, but he felt his business cannot survive without a phone and
two electrical power outlets; one outside the building for a refrigeration cooler and one inside
for a small cooler, radio, vacuum cleaner, and so forth. He specified that refrigeration is a
necessity to keep bacteria down and provide a premium product to his customers. He felt
everyone needed a telephone in their business. He also wanted a security light at night. If
allowed to have utilities, he will be happy to obey any restrictions placed upon him, such as
no cooking, packaging, and so forth. He knew laws are necessary, but felt there should be
exceptions, and he could see no downside to an exception. He thanked the Commissioners
in advance for their help.
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating explained Mr. Timinsky's
vegetable stand is in the unincorporated area where the property is zoned CG (General
Commercial). CG zoning allows certain types of temporary uses and permanent retail
facilities. Temporary uses, such as transient merchants, do not need to meet the strict criteria
for permanent use. They neither pay traffic impact fees, have a permanent building, have
paved parking or landscaping, nor are they permitted to connect to water and sewer. He
believed the general concept when the LDRs were established was to put more restrictions
on the temporary uses in order to give a level playing field and not give undue advantage to
temporary uses. Transient merchants are also allowed in the Agricultural District. There are
April 3, 2001
53
�It PG 74 1
currently 7 fruit and vegetable stands in the county which are subject to the same criteria.
Staff feels the restrictions are reasonable. Mr. Timinsky could come in with a site plan and
get what he is asking for.
Mr. Timinsky advised that his site is surrounded by very old oak trees; he felt it
would be a travesty to pour concrete (for parking) over the roots of those trees. He stressed
that there are stands that do have power.
Commissioner Adams supported Mr. Timinsky's request. She thought the origin of
the stands went back to farmers who sold their produce near their farms, so they were not
required to meet permitting regulations. She saw the importance of refrigeration and thought
this was something the Board should permit as part of the protection of the public's health
due to the danger of bacteria growth. Refrigeration is key to keeping produce fresh and safe.
How to prevent other uses of the electrical, such as coffee shops or ice cream parlors, is
another matter. She believed the Board would not want to have air-conditioning or other
amenities which would require heavy site -planning. A phone at Mr. Timinsky's location
would be helpful but having a cell phone now is less expensive than the installation of a
telephone.
Commissioner Macht agreed with staff that it would give Mr. Timinsky an unfair
advantage over merchants in a similar business who do pay impact fees and have other costs.
Commissioner Adams countered that other businesses sell otherproducts besides fresh
produce.
Chairman Ginn thought it would be simple to contact FP&L, and Mr. Timinsky
advised there is already power on the site.
Planning Director Stan Boling pointed out this has been on the books since 1987, and
that it does affect other similar businesses. If electricity is allowed, uses of it would have to
be specified. These stands have come and gone over the years; he felt enforcement has kept
down their proliferation. There are other ramifications with an LDR change which this
April 3, 2001
B1 i 1 7 PG 74 2 54
currently 7 fruit and vegetable stands in the county which are subject to the same criteria.
Staff feels the restrictions are reasonable. Mr. Timinsky could come in with a site plan and
get what he is asking for.
Mr. Timinsky advised that his site is surrounded by very old oak trees; he felt it
would be a travesty to pour concrete (for parking) over the roots of those trees. He stressed
that there are stands that do have power.
Commissioner Adams supported Mr. Timinsky's request. She thought the origin of
the stands went back to farmers who sold their produce near their farms, so they were not
required to meet permitting regulations. She saw the importance of refrigeration and thought
this was something the Board should permit as part of the protection of the public's health
due to the danger of bacteria growth. Refrigeration is key to keeping produce fresh and safe.
How to prevent other uses of the electrical, such as coffee shops or ice cream parlors, is
another matter. She believed the Board would not want to have air-conditioning or other
amenities which would require heavy site -planning. A phone at Mr. Timinsky's location
would be helpful but having a cell phone now is less expensive than the installation of a
telephone.
Commissioner Macht agreed with staff that it would give Mr. Timinsky an unfair
advantage over merchants in a similar business who do pay impact fees and have other costs.
Commissioner Adams countered that other businesses sell otherproducts besides fresh
produce.
Chairman Ginn thought it would be simple to contact FP&L, and Mr. Timinsky
advised there is already power on the site.
Planning Director Stan Boling pointed out this has been on the books since 1987, and
that it does affect other similar businesses. If electricity is allowed, uses of it would have to
be specified. These stands have come and gone over the years; he felt enforcement has kept
down their proliferation. There are other ramifications with an LDR change which this
April 3, 2001
B1 i 1 7 PG 74 2 54
currently 7 fruit and vegetable stands in the county which are subject to the same criteria.
Staff feels the restrictions are reasonable. Mr. Timinsky could come in with a site plan and
get what he is asking for.
Mr. Timinsky advised that his site is surrounded by very old oak trees; he felt it
would be a travesty to pour concrete (for parking) over the roots of those trees. He stressed
that there are stands that do have power.
Commissioner Adams supported Mr. Timinsky's request. She thought the origin of
the stands went back to farmers who sold their produce near their farms, so they were not
required to meet permitting regulations. She saw the importance of refrigeration and thought
this was something the Board should permit as part of the protection of the public's health
due to the danger of bacteria growth. Refrigeration is key to keeping produce fresh and safe.
How to prevent other uses of the electrical, such as coffee shops or ice cream parlors, is
another matter. She believed the Board would not want to have air-conditioning or other
amenities which would require heavy site -planning. A phone at Mr. Timinsky's location
would be helpful but having a cell phone now is less expensive than the installation of a
telephone.
Commissioner Macht agreed with staff that it would give Mr. Timinsky an unfair
advantage over merchants in a similar business who do pay impact fees and have other costs.
Commissioner Adams countered that other businesses sell otherproducts besides fresh
produce.
Chairman Ginn thought it would be simple to contact FP&L, and Mr. Timinsky
advised there is already power on the site.
Planning Director Stan Boling pointed out this has been on the books since 1987, and
that it does affect other similar businesses. If electricity is allowed, uses of it would have to
be specified. These stands have come and gone over the years; he felt enforcement has kept
down their proliferation. There are other ramifications with an LDR change which this
April 3, 2001
B1 i 1 7 PG 74 2 54
would take.
Commissioner Macht suggested the Commissioners look at all the ramifications
before proceeding.
Other Commissioners agreed and Vice Chairman Stanbridge stressed the importance
especially since there are 6 others.
Director Boling addressed several questions.
Mr. Timinsky pointed out his stand is not so temporary. It is built on the slab of a
former house with a vegetable stand that had power over 40 years ago.
Director Boling advised that Bobby's stand has a similar situation
There has already
been code enforcement action on two of the stands for hooking up to power,
several of the stands are in very close proximity to electrical hookups.
He believed
Commissioner Adams asked if the Commissioners would be averse to trying to work
something out where it would be limited to the commercial area and refrigeration. She
thought it was a public health issue and that it would not create an unfair advantage.
Chairman Ginn suggested the Board refer it to staff.
Commissioner Macht suggested that it be done with dispatch so that, if relief can be
had, it could be granted swiftly.
There was CONSENSUS to refer this to staff and ask them to bring it back in a couple
of weeks.
Director Keating advised that an LDR change would need to go to the Professional
Services Advisory Committee, Planning and Zoning Commission, advertising and public
hearings. It would take between 60 and 90 days.
Commissioner Macht asked for an inventory of the other stands and their locations.
Director Boling advised that in the meantime, staff would enforce what is on the
permits, to have no electrical hookup, but they will run an LDR change through the process
based on this discussion.
April 3, 2001
55 // 743
would take.
Commissioner Macht suggested the Commissioners look at all the ramifications
before proceeding.
Other Commissioners agreed and Vice Chairman Stanbridge stressed the importance
especially since there are 6 others.
Director Boling addressed several questions.
Mr. Timinsky pointed out his stand is not so temporary. It is built on the slab of a
former house with a vegetable stand that had power over 40 years ago.
Director Boling advised that Bobby's stand has a similar situation
There has already
been code enforcement action on two of the stands for hooking up to power,
several of the stands are in very close proximity to electrical hookups.
He believed
Commissioner Adams asked if the Commissioners would be averse to trying to work
something out where it would be limited to the commercial area and refrigeration. She
thought it was a public health issue and that it would not create an unfair advantage.
Chairman Ginn suggested the Board refer it to staff.
Commissioner Macht suggested that it be done with dispatch so that, if relief can be
had, it could be granted swiftly.
There was CONSENSUS to refer this to staff and ask them to bring it back in a couple
of weeks.
Director Keating advised that an LDR change would need to go to the Professional
Services Advisory Committee, Planning and Zoning Commission, advertising and public
hearings. It would take between 60 and 90 days.
Commissioner Macht asked for an inventory of the other stands and their locations.
Director Boling advised that in the meantime, staff would enforce what is on the
permits, to have no electrical hookup, but they will run an LDR change through the process
based on this discussion.
April 3, 2001
55 // 743
would take.
Commissioner Macht suggested the Commissioners look at all the ramifications
before proceeding.
Other Commissioners agreed and Vice Chairman Stanbridge stressed the importance
especially since there are 6 others.
Director Boling addressed several questions.
Mr. Timinsky pointed out his stand is not so temporary. It is built on the slab of a
former house with a vegetable stand that had power over 40 years ago.
Director Boling advised that Bobby's stand has a similar situation
There has already
been code enforcement action on two of the stands for hooking up to power,
several of the stands are in very close proximity to electrical hookups.
He believed
Commissioner Adams asked if the Commissioners would be averse to trying to work
something out where it would be limited to the commercial area and refrigeration. She
thought it was a public health issue and that it would not create an unfair advantage.
Chairman Ginn suggested the Board refer it to staff.
Commissioner Macht suggested that it be done with dispatch so that, if relief can be
had, it could be granted swiftly.
There was CONSENSUS to refer this to staff and ask them to bring it back in a couple
of weeks.
Director Keating advised that an LDR change would need to go to the Professional
Services Advisory Committee, Planning and Zoning Commission, advertising and public
hearings. It would take between 60 and 90 days.
Commissioner Macht asked for an inventory of the other stands and their locations.
Director Boling advised that in the meantime, staff would enforce what is on the
permits, to have no electrical hookup, but they will run an LDR change through the process
based on this discussion.
April 3, 2001
55 // 743
Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought the length of time the stands have been in place
should count; some stay six months and are gone. She thought the ones which continue to
operate deserve a little extra consideration.
Director Boling confirmed that some of the longest standing facilities in the county
are temporary uses.
9A2.
Chairman Ginn thought staff understood what the Commissioners wanted.
The Board reviewed a letter of March 27, 2001:
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365
Att: Margaret A. Gunter
AGENDA request Public Discussion
Subject: Would like to discuss election reform,
April 3, 2001
56
4 4
8775 20th St, N3
Vero Beach, FL 32966
March 27, 2001
Respectfully,
April 3, 2001
Sidney W. Turner
J`z' - X 70
Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought the length of time the stands have been in place
should count; some stay six months and are gone. She thought the ones which continue to
operate deserve a little extra consideration.
Director Boling confirmed that some of the longest standing facilities in the county
are temporary uses.
9A2.
Chairman Ginn thought staff understood what the Commissioners wanted.
The Board reviewed a letter of March 27, 2001:
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365
Att: Margaret A. Gunter
AGENDA request Public Discussion
Subject: Would like to discuss election reform,
April 3, 2001
56
4 4
8775 20th St, N3
Vero Beach, FL 32966
March 27, 2001
Respectfully,
April 3, 2001
Sidney W. Turner
J`z' - X 70
Vice Chairman Stanbridge thought the length of time the stands have been in place
should count; some stay six months and are gone. She thought the ones which continue to
operate deserve a little extra consideration.
Director Boling confirmed that some of the longest standing facilities in the county
are temporary uses.
9A2.
Chairman Ginn thought staff understood what the Commissioners wanted.
The Board reviewed a letter of March 27, 2001:
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365
Att: Margaret A. Gunter
AGENDA request Public Discussion
Subject: Would like to discuss election reform,
April 3, 2001
56
4 4
8775 20th St, N3
Vero Beach, FL 32966
March 27, 2001
Respectfully,
April 3, 2001
Sidney W. Turner
J`z' - X 70
When this agenda item was called, Mr. Turner was not present. The Chairman noted
at the conclusion of the recess following item 9.B.3., that Mr. Turner was present and called
on him. For purposes of continuity, the minutes for that discussion follow.
Sidney W. Turner, 8775 20`h Street, Vero Beach, commented on the recent
presidential election and the problems with punch card voting and tabulation
He spoke of
the methods being discussed in Tallahassee and in the media for replacement of the punch
card method. He agreed with Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem that the recommended use
of optical scanners was not the answer and called it "archaic". He read from an article in
the morning's newspaper and noted his agreements and disagreements with the statements
therein. He felt election reform should not wait until the next presidential election and urged
the Board of County Commissioners to recognize the punch card voting system was not
good. He strongly believed that legal voters should not be disenfranchised due to confusion
with the voting method used.
The Board reviewed a letter of March 28, 2001:
Francis M. Coffey
1335 River Ridge Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32963-2564
Mr. James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Dear Mr. Chandler;
March 28, 2001
This is a request that I be on the agenda of the CountySIF! It ll��"
under 'Public Discussion Items' regarding status capital projects. The meeting
Sincerely, of
minutes of the Commissioners of February t 2001 will be Commissioners for April 3, 2001
e used as backup.
Francis M. Coffey_ _
April 3, 2001
57
B PG 45
When this agenda item was called, Mr. Turner was not present. The Chairman noted
at the conclusion of the recess following item 9.B.3., that Mr. Turner was present and called
on him. For purposes of continuity, the minutes for that discussion follow.
Sidney W. Turner, 8775 20`h Street, Vero Beach, commented on the recent
presidential election and the problems with punch card voting and tabulation
He spoke of
the methods being discussed in Tallahassee and in the media for replacement of the punch
card method. He agreed with Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem that the recommended use
of optical scanners was not the answer and called it "archaic". He read from an article in
the morning's newspaper and noted his agreements and disagreements with the statements
therein. He felt election reform should not wait until the next presidential election and urged
the Board of County Commissioners to recognize the punch card voting system was not
good. He strongly believed that legal voters should not be disenfranchised due to confusion
with the voting method used.
The Board reviewed a letter of March 28, 2001:
Francis M. Coffey
1335 River Ridge Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32963-2564
Mr. James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Dear Mr. Chandler;
March 28, 2001
This is a request that I be on the agenda of the CountySIF! It ll��"
under 'Public Discussion Items' regarding status capital projects. The meeting
Sincerely, of
minutes of the Commissioners of February t 2001 will be Commissioners for April 3, 2001
e used as backup.
Francis M. Coffey_ _
April 3, 2001
57
B PG 45
When this agenda item was called, Mr. Turner was not present. The Chairman noted
at the conclusion of the recess following item 9.B.3., that Mr. Turner was present and called
on him. For purposes of continuity, the minutes for that discussion follow.
Sidney W. Turner, 8775 20`h Street, Vero Beach, commented on the recent
presidential election and the problems with punch card voting and tabulation
He spoke of
the methods being discussed in Tallahassee and in the media for replacement of the punch
card method. He agreed with Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem that the recommended use
of optical scanners was not the answer and called it "archaic". He read from an article in
the morning's newspaper and noted his agreements and disagreements with the statements
therein. He felt election reform should not wait until the next presidential election and urged
the Board of County Commissioners to recognize the punch card voting system was not
good. He strongly believed that legal voters should not be disenfranchised due to confusion
with the voting method used.
The Board reviewed a letter of March 28, 2001:
Francis M. Coffey
1335 River Ridge Drive
Vero Beach, FL 32963-2564
Mr. James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Dear Mr. Chandler;
March 28, 2001
This is a request that I be on the agenda of the CountySIF! It ll��"
under 'Public Discussion Items' regarding status capital projects. The meeting
Sincerely, of
minutes of the Commissioners of February t 2001 will be Commissioners for April 3, 2001
e used as backup.
Francis M. Coffey_ _
April 3, 2001
57
B PG 45
Frank Coffey, 1335 River Ridge Drive, Vero Beach, read from his prepared remarks
and from selected paragraphs (pages 73, 74, and 75) from the unapproved minutes of the
Board of County Commissioners' meeting held February 13, 2001. (Clerk's note: Both Mr.
Coffey's handwritten remarks and minutes have been filed with the backup for the meeting.)
He believed that all taxpayers would like to receive quarterly reports on the status of the
County's projects such as the following: PEP reef, Beach Restoration, Roads and Bridges,
Closed Landfills, Gun Range, and North County Park. He had learned about an in-house
county document being utilized regarding the status of such projects, but in his opinion it
provided limited useful information and it was not current. He gave examples of information
on the Beach Restoration Project from the in-house report. He also recommended what
minimum detailed information should be on the report as follows: date, project engineer,
scope of work, expected benefits, date approved, approved by, estimated costs, source of
funds, anticipated completion date, expenditures to date, accomplishments previous quarter,
anticipated accomplishments in next quarter, and major issues unresolved. He urged the
Board to establish a budget oversight group of at least 10 taxpayers under the direction of
Assistant Administrator Baird as soon as possible with at least the following objectives: 1)
develop a status report format to be used to summarize the status of each significant project
on a quarterly basis; and 2) develop a proposed policy setting forth appropriate criteria for
reallocation of funds from one approved project to another.
In closing, Mr. Coffey acknowledged the presence of Press Journal Reporter Mike
Kaiser and wished him well in his new job in Stuart.
Administrator Chandler advised that he and Assistant Administrator Baird receive
project progress reports from staff on a regular basis as well as expense and revenue reports
and use them as tools. Subsequent to the meeting of February 13`h, they brought back the
status on the North County Pool project and the Shooting Range. They also bring items to
the Board when there are changes or anticipated changes in capital expenditures.
April 3, 2001
BIi
Frank Coffey, 1335 River Ridge Drive, Vero Beach, read from his prepared remarks
and from selected paragraphs (pages 73, 74, and 75) from the unapproved minutes of the
Board of County Commissioners' meeting held February 13, 2001. (Clerk's note: Both Mr.
Coffey's handwritten remarks and minutes have been filed with the backup for the meeting.)
He believed that all taxpayers would like to receive quarterly reports on the status of the
County's projects such as the following: PEP reef, Beach Restoration, Roads and Bridges,
Closed Landfills, Gun Range, and North County Park. He had learned about an in-house
county document being utilized regarding the status of such projects, but in his opinion it
provided limited useful information and it was not current. He gave examples of information
on the Beach Restoration Project from the in-house report. He also recommended what
minimum detailed information should be on the report as follows: date, project engineer,
scope of work, expected benefits, date approved, approved by, estimated costs, source of
funds, anticipated completion date, expenditures to date, accomplishments previous quarter,
anticipated accomplishments in next quarter, and major issues unresolved. He urged the
Board to establish a budget oversight group of at least 10 taxpayers under the direction of
Assistant Administrator Baird as soon as possible with at least the following objectives: 1)
develop a status report format to be used to summarize the status of each significant project
on a quarterly basis; and 2) develop a proposed policy setting forth appropriate criteria for
reallocation of funds from one approved project to another.
In closing, Mr. Coffey acknowledged the presence of Press Journal Reporter Mike
Kaiser and wished him well in his new job in Stuart.
Administrator Chandler advised that he and Assistant Administrator Baird receive
project progress reports from staff on a regular basis as well as expense and revenue reports
and use them as tools. Subsequent to the meeting of February 13`h, they brought back the
status on the North County Pool project and the Shooting Range. They also bring items to
the Board when there are changes or anticipated changes in capital expenditures.
April 3, 2001
BIi
Frank Coffey, 1335 River Ridge Drive, Vero Beach, read from his prepared remarks
and from selected paragraphs (pages 73, 74, and 75) from the unapproved minutes of the
Board of County Commissioners' meeting held February 13, 2001. (Clerk's note: Both Mr.
Coffey's handwritten remarks and minutes have been filed with the backup for the meeting.)
He believed that all taxpayers would like to receive quarterly reports on the status of the
County's projects such as the following: PEP reef, Beach Restoration, Roads and Bridges,
Closed Landfills, Gun Range, and North County Park. He had learned about an in-house
county document being utilized regarding the status of such projects, but in his opinion it
provided limited useful information and it was not current. He gave examples of information
on the Beach Restoration Project from the in-house report. He also recommended what
minimum detailed information should be on the report as follows: date, project engineer,
scope of work, expected benefits, date approved, approved by, estimated costs, source of
funds, anticipated completion date, expenditures to date, accomplishments previous quarter,
anticipated accomplishments in next quarter, and major issues unresolved. He urged the
Board to establish a budget oversight group of at least 10 taxpayers under the direction of
Assistant Administrator Baird as soon as possible with at least the following objectives: 1)
develop a status report format to be used to summarize the status of each significant project
on a quarterly basis; and 2) develop a proposed policy setting forth appropriate criteria for
reallocation of funds from one approved project to another.
In closing, Mr. Coffey acknowledged the presence of Press Journal Reporter Mike
Kaiser and wished him well in his new job in Stuart.
Administrator Chandler advised that he and Assistant Administrator Baird receive
project progress reports from staff on a regular basis as well as expense and revenue reports
and use them as tools. Subsequent to the meeting of February 13`h, they brought back the
status on the North County Pool project and the Shooting Range. They also bring items to
the Board when there are changes or anticipated changes in capital expenditures.
April 3, 2001
BIi
•
Assistant Administrator Baird added that each project is tracked as well as all
expenditures. About 50 reports are developed each month on all projects. The books are
open to anyone who wishes to see them. Every dime of optional sales tax has been
accounted for from day one. He thought Indian River County was the only jurisdiction that
has that record. Project costs are estimated and change constantly. Policy for projects is up
to the Commission. There might be a scope change or a feeling by the Commissioners that
a project needs to be expanded because of public need. He emphasized that there is an
accounting on every project. He believed the numbers referred to by Mr. Coffey came from
the Budget office. The problem typically encountered is finding there is a bigger need than
what has been planned; the community has grown more than anticipated.
Administrator Chandler stressed that when the income from the optional sales tax is
projected on a capital improvement project, estimates are based on information available at
the time. Staff tries to be conservative in those estimates. Once approved, a project may
need to be amended because the estimates from a year prior may fall short or the project may
require changes due to unforeseen circumstances. There are needs for adjustments when
projecting a capital program over a 5 year time span.
Mr. Coffey specified he was not questioning the accountability and agreed the County
has the finest records. He believed there is a better way of letting the Commissioners and
taxpayers know the status of projects and where their money is being spent. He clearly
understood the need for making adjustments in a 5 year forecast for capital projects.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised that the State does not require counties to have
a 5 -year plan on the optional sales tax, it has been done at the Commission's request. The
K
reason is to earmark funds for certain projects needed in the future so everyone is aware that
the projects are planned. Sometimes, by being pro -active in this area, there is criticism.
Usually, a good estimate of cost is not available until there is a design but monies estimated
for the project and set aside.
April 3, 2001
59
89 1 17 1'G 7 4 7
•
Assistant Administrator Baird added that each project is tracked as well as all
expenditures. About 50 reports are developed each month on all projects. The books are
open to anyone who wishes to see them. Every dime of optional sales tax has been
accounted for from day one. He thought Indian River County was the only jurisdiction that
has that record. Project costs are estimated and change constantly. Policy for projects is up
to the Commission. There might be a scope change or a feeling by the Commissioners that
a project needs to be expanded because of public need. He emphasized that there is an
accounting on every project. He believed the numbers referred to by Mr. Coffey came from
the Budget office. The problem typically encountered is finding there is a bigger need than
what has been planned; the community has grown more than anticipated.
Administrator Chandler stressed that when the income from the optional sales tax is
projected on a capital improvement project, estimates are based on information available at
the time. Staff tries to be conservative in those estimates. Once approved, a project may
need to be amended because the estimates from a year prior may fall short or the project may
require changes due to unforeseen circumstances. There are needs for adjustments when
projecting a capital program over a 5 year time span.
Mr. Coffey specified he was not questioning the accountability and agreed the County
has the finest records. He believed there is a better way of letting the Commissioners and
taxpayers know the status of projects and where their money is being spent. He clearly
understood the need for making adjustments in a 5 year forecast for capital projects.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised that the State does not require counties to have
a 5 -year plan on the optional sales tax, it has been done at the Commission's request. The
K
reason is to earmark funds for certain projects needed in the future so everyone is aware that
the projects are planned. Sometimes, by being pro -active in this area, there is criticism.
Usually, a good estimate of cost is not available until there is a design but monies estimated
for the project and set aside.
April 3, 2001
59
89 1 17 1'G 7 4 7
•
Assistant Administrator Baird added that each project is tracked as well as all
expenditures. About 50 reports are developed each month on all projects. The books are
open to anyone who wishes to see them. Every dime of optional sales tax has been
accounted for from day one. He thought Indian River County was the only jurisdiction that
has that record. Project costs are estimated and change constantly. Policy for projects is up
to the Commission. There might be a scope change or a feeling by the Commissioners that
a project needs to be expanded because of public need. He emphasized that there is an
accounting on every project. He believed the numbers referred to by Mr. Coffey came from
the Budget office. The problem typically encountered is finding there is a bigger need than
what has been planned; the community has grown more than anticipated.
Administrator Chandler stressed that when the income from the optional sales tax is
projected on a capital improvement project, estimates are based on information available at
the time. Staff tries to be conservative in those estimates. Once approved, a project may
need to be amended because the estimates from a year prior may fall short or the project may
require changes due to unforeseen circumstances. There are needs for adjustments when
projecting a capital program over a 5 year time span.
Mr. Coffey specified he was not questioning the accountability and agreed the County
has the finest records. He believed there is a better way of letting the Commissioners and
taxpayers know the status of projects and where their money is being spent. He clearly
understood the need for making adjustments in a 5 year forecast for capital projects.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised that the State does not require counties to have
a 5 -year plan on the optional sales tax, it has been done at the Commission's request. The
K
reason is to earmark funds for certain projects needed in the future so everyone is aware that
the projects are planned. Sometimes, by being pro -active in this area, there is criticism.
Usually, a good estimate of cost is not available until there is a design but monies estimated
for the project and set aside.
April 3, 2001
59
89 1 17 1'G 7 4 7
Concerning the report referred to by Mr. Coffey, Assistant Administrator Baird
advised that it contains information which is updated quarterly. It is a management tool that
is being refined and improved. There are often 80 to 100 projects on the report on-going at
all times. Mr. Coffey may have a point on the beach restoration, but the estimated time line
may be just for initial permitting.
Chairman Ginn thought there was a report in place and if it can be improved, that
would be wonderful. She also thought it would be helpful if the Commissioners received the
quarterly report.
ERA
- . `-' A a a LLnt.11 t,i V ll_. AJNV(JA 1'10N O
COMM1,qCTnN'c nr�iQYfAXT T1-. ♦ " A v
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a memorandum of March 28, 2001 using the
site map (page 115 of the backup) and an aerial photograph:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Treating, A
Community Developr
i
a
,, >
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director \\
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICw iM\
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE:
April 3, 2001
March 28. 2001
BK 60
J r63 7 4
LL
Concerning the report referred to by Mr. Coffey, Assistant Administrator Baird
advised that it contains information which is updated quarterly. It is a management tool that
is being refined and improved. There are often 80 to 100 projects on the report on-going at
all times. Mr. Coffey may have a point on the beach restoration, but the estimated time line
may be just for initial permitting.
Chairman Ginn thought there was a report in place and if it can be improved, that
would be wonderful. She also thought it would be helpful if the Commissioners received the
quarterly report.
ERA
- . `-' A a a LLnt.11 t,i V ll_. AJNV(JA 1'10N O
COMM1,qCTnN'c nr�iQYfAXT T1-. ♦ " A v
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a memorandum of March 28, 2001 using the
site map (page 115 of the backup) and an aerial photograph:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Treating, A
Community Developr
i
a
,, >
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director \\
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICw iM\
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE:
April 3, 2001
March 28. 2001
BK 60
J r63 7 4
LL
Concerning the report referred to by Mr. Coffey, Assistant Administrator Baird
advised that it contains information which is updated quarterly. It is a management tool that
is being refined and improved. There are often 80 to 100 projects on the report on-going at
all times. Mr. Coffey may have a point on the beach restoration, but the estimated time line
may be just for initial permitting.
Chairman Ginn thought there was a report in place and if it can be improved, that
would be wonderful. She also thought it would be helpful if the Commissioners received the
quarterly report.
ERA
- . `-' A a a LLnt.11 t,i V ll_. AJNV(JA 1'10N O
COMM1,qCTnN'c nr�iQYfAXT T1-. ♦ " A v
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a memorandum of March 28, 2001 using the
site map (page 115 of the backup) and an aerial photograph:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Treating, A
Community Developr
i
a
,, >
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director \\
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICw iM\
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE:
April 3, 2001
March 28. 2001
BK 60
J r63 7 4
LL
i
SUBJECT: Appeals by Steve and Linda Brown and the North Beach Civic Association of
a Planning and Zoning Commission Decision to Approve a Major Site Plan for
a 7 Unit Building for the Atlas Development Company
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Steve and Linda Brown and the North Beach Civic Association have each filed separate appeals of
a decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve a site plan for a proposed seven -unit
condominium building on a north barrier island oceanfront site. At its February 22, 2001 meeting,
the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 1 to approve the project with conditions. The two
appeals have been consolidated under a single item in an effort to provide a more efficient means
of Board of County Commissioners' consideration. For reference, please refer to the staff report and
minutes from the February 22, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (See attachment
#2).
According to the county's land development regulations (LDRs), appeals of decisions of the
Planning and Zoning Commission are considered by the Board of County Commissioners. The
Board is authorized to review the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision and approve, approve
with conditions, or deny the subject site plan application.
The site plan application now under appeal was submitted by Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc.
on behalf of Atlas Development Corp. This application reflects the applicant's proposal to develop
a 7 unit condominium building. Located between SR A -1-A and the Atlantic Ocean, the 1.83 acre
subject property is just north of the Summer Place subdivision, and is zoned multi -family (RM -4).
The homes located south of the subject site in Summer Place were built in the 1970's and are located
seaward of the 1987 Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and in some cases up to and
partially seaward of the 1981 CCCL. North of the subject site, there is a more recently constructed
home that is located just landward of the 1987 CCCL. That home is owned by appellants Steve and
Linda Brown.
The Atlas Development Company is proposing a single three story building containing 7 units with
a separate pool. The entire building and approximately one-half of the pool area are to be located
landward of the 1987 CCCL with the remaining portion of the pool area located east of the 1987
CCCL. As proposed, the Atlas Development project will have a single driveway connection to SR
A -1-A to provide access to the 7 units. As required by the county's land development regulations,
the site plan depicts a landscaped Type "D"double frontage buffer along the south property line
(Sandalwood Lane).
t
Over the past year and a half, several site plan designs for the site have been proposed and submitted.
The first project was known as the Boston Homes/Orchid Dune project, and proposed two units and
two guest cottages with building area located seaward of the 1987 CCCL. That project was approved
by the Board of County Commissioners and then appealed to court by surrounding property owners.
The court overturned the Board's approval on procedural grounds.
A second proposal was later submitted to construct a 7 -unit condominium building.
was similar to the resent one, o That site plan
p but proposed locating the condominium building partially seaward
of the 1987 CCCL. The Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial
of the site plan application (see attachment #3).
F April 3, 2001
61 BK I i i' PG
i
SUBJECT: Appeals by Steve and Linda Brown and the North Beach Civic Association of
a Planning and Zoning Commission Decision to Approve a Major Site Plan for
a 7 Unit Building for the Atlas Development Company
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Steve and Linda Brown and the North Beach Civic Association have each filed separate appeals of
a decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve a site plan for a proposed seven -unit
condominium building on a north barrier island oceanfront site. At its February 22, 2001 meeting,
the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 1 to approve the project with conditions. The two
appeals have been consolidated under a single item in an effort to provide a more efficient means
of Board of County Commissioners' consideration. For reference, please refer to the staff report and
minutes from the February 22, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (See attachment
#2).
According to the county's land development regulations (LDRs), appeals of decisions of the
Planning and Zoning Commission are considered by the Board of County Commissioners. The
Board is authorized to review the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision and approve, approve
with conditions, or deny the subject site plan application.
The site plan application now under appeal was submitted by Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc.
on behalf of Atlas Development Corp. This application reflects the applicant's proposal to develop
a 7 unit condominium building. Located between SR A -1-A and the Atlantic Ocean, the 1.83 acre
subject property is just north of the Summer Place subdivision, and is zoned multi -family (RM -4).
The homes located south of the subject site in Summer Place were built in the 1970's and are located
seaward of the 1987 Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and in some cases up to and
partially seaward of the 1981 CCCL. North of the subject site, there is a more recently constructed
home that is located just landward of the 1987 CCCL. That home is owned by appellants Steve and
Linda Brown.
The Atlas Development Company is proposing a single three story building containing 7 units with
a separate pool. The entire building and approximately one-half of the pool area are to be located
landward of the 1987 CCCL with the remaining portion of the pool area located east of the 1987
CCCL. As proposed, the Atlas Development project will have a single driveway connection to SR
A -1-A to provide access to the 7 units. As required by the county's land development regulations,
the site plan depicts a landscaped Type "D"double frontage buffer along the south property line
(Sandalwood Lane).
t
Over the past year and a half, several site plan designs for the site have been proposed and submitted.
The first project was known as the Boston Homes/Orchid Dune project, and proposed two units and
two guest cottages with building area located seaward of the 1987 CCCL. That project was approved
by the Board of County Commissioners and then appealed to court by surrounding property owners.
The court overturned the Board's approval on procedural grounds.
A second proposal was later submitted to construct a 7 -unit condominium building.
was similar to the resent one, o That site plan
p but proposed locating the condominium building partially seaward
of the 1987 CCCL. The Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial
of the site plan application (see attachment #3).
F April 3, 2001
61 BK I i i' PG
i
SUBJECT: Appeals by Steve and Linda Brown and the North Beach Civic Association of
a Planning and Zoning Commission Decision to Approve a Major Site Plan for
a 7 Unit Building for the Atlas Development Company
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Steve and Linda Brown and the North Beach Civic Association have each filed separate appeals of
a decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve a site plan for a proposed seven -unit
condominium building on a north barrier island oceanfront site. At its February 22, 2001 meeting,
the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 1 to approve the project with conditions. The two
appeals have been consolidated under a single item in an effort to provide a more efficient means
of Board of County Commissioners' consideration. For reference, please refer to the staff report and
minutes from the February 22, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting (See attachment
#2).
According to the county's land development regulations (LDRs), appeals of decisions of the
Planning and Zoning Commission are considered by the Board of County Commissioners. The
Board is authorized to review the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision and approve, approve
with conditions, or deny the subject site plan application.
The site plan application now under appeal was submitted by Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc.
on behalf of Atlas Development Corp. This application reflects the applicant's proposal to develop
a 7 unit condominium building. Located between SR A -1-A and the Atlantic Ocean, the 1.83 acre
subject property is just north of the Summer Place subdivision, and is zoned multi -family (RM -4).
The homes located south of the subject site in Summer Place were built in the 1970's and are located
seaward of the 1987 Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and in some cases up to and
partially seaward of the 1981 CCCL. North of the subject site, there is a more recently constructed
home that is located just landward of the 1987 CCCL. That home is owned by appellants Steve and
Linda Brown.
The Atlas Development Company is proposing a single three story building containing 7 units with
a separate pool. The entire building and approximately one-half of the pool area are to be located
landward of the 1987 CCCL with the remaining portion of the pool area located east of the 1987
CCCL. As proposed, the Atlas Development project will have a single driveway connection to SR
A -1-A to provide access to the 7 units. As required by the county's land development regulations,
the site plan depicts a landscaped Type "D"double frontage buffer along the south property line
(Sandalwood Lane).
t
Over the past year and a half, several site plan designs for the site have been proposed and submitted.
The first project was known as the Boston Homes/Orchid Dune project, and proposed two units and
two guest cottages with building area located seaward of the 1987 CCCL. That project was approved
by the Board of County Commissioners and then appealed to court by surrounding property owners.
The court overturned the Board's approval on procedural grounds.
A second proposal was later submitted to construct a 7 -unit condominium building.
was similar to the resent one, o That site plan
p but proposed locating the condominium building partially seaward
of the 1987 CCCL. The Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial
of the site plan application (see attachment #3).
F April 3, 2001
61 BK I i i' PG
The Board is now to consider this third site plan application for the site, and the appeals of the
Planning and Zoning Commission's approval of that site plan. The Board may uphold or overturn
the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. In doing so, the Board may approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the subject site plan application.
• Planning and Zoning Commission Action Being Appealed
Procedurally, the Atlas Development Company application followed the county's standard site plan
review process. After extensive review, staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning
Commission approve the site plan application subject to conditions, including a condition that the
applicant obtain a DEP coastal construction control line permit for the pool and a separate condition
that the applicant provide documentation showing that the building meets the 35 building height
limitation. After considering comments from the public and the applicant, the Commission voted 6 -
1 to approve the site plan.
• Appellants' Concerns
The appellants have raised three specific areas of concern. These three concerns relate to:
• emergency services issues
• the effects of the proposed development on surrounding properties, based on the size
and scope of the proposed development
• erosion issues related to those proposed improvements (e.g. portion of the pool)
proposed to be located seaward of the 1987 CCCL
These concerns are addressed in the analysis portion of this report.
ANALYSIS:
The county's land development regulations (LDRs) provide criteria for the Board to use in its review
of the appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision on the site plan application. These
criteria, based on LDR section 902.07 (see attachment #5), are as follows:
(1) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to follow the appropriate review
procedures?
(2) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner?
i
(3) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of
the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public
health, safety and welfare?
(4) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to evaluate the application with
respect to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations of Indian River
County?
The Board is to consider each of these criteria and make findings in all 4 areas addressed by the
criteria. Staffs analysis of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision in regard to the 4
criteria is as follows:
April 3, 2001
OK 1 17 PG 15 6z
0
The Board is now to consider this third site plan application for the site, and the appeals of the
Planning and Zoning Commission's approval of that site plan. The Board may uphold or overturn
the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. In doing so, the Board may approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the subject site plan application.
• Planning and Zoning Commission Action Being Appealed
Procedurally, the Atlas Development Company application followed the county's standard site plan
review process. After extensive review, staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning
Commission approve the site plan application subject to conditions, including a condition that the
applicant obtain a DEP coastal construction control line permit for the pool and a separate condition
that the applicant provide documentation showing that the building meets the 35 building height
limitation. After considering comments from the public and the applicant, the Commission voted 6 -
1 to approve the site plan.
• Appellants' Concerns
The appellants have raised three specific areas of concern. These three concerns relate to:
• emergency services issues
• the effects of the proposed development on surrounding properties, based on the size
and scope of the proposed development
• erosion issues related to those proposed improvements (e.g. portion of the pool)
proposed to be located seaward of the 1987 CCCL
These concerns are addressed in the analysis portion of this report.
ANALYSIS:
The county's land development regulations (LDRs) provide criteria for the Board to use in its review
of the appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision on the site plan application. These
criteria, based on LDR section 902.07 (see attachment #5), are as follows:
(1) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to follow the appropriate review
procedures?
(2) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner?
i
(3) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of
the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public
health, safety and welfare?
(4) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to evaluate the application with
respect to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations of Indian River
County?
The Board is to consider each of these criteria and make findings in all 4 areas addressed by the
criteria. Staffs analysis of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision in regard to the 4
criteria is as follows:
April 3, 2001
OK 1 17 PG 15 6z
0
The Board is now to consider this third site plan application for the site, and the appeals of the
Planning and Zoning Commission's approval of that site plan. The Board may uphold or overturn
the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. In doing so, the Board may approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the subject site plan application.
• Planning and Zoning Commission Action Being Appealed
Procedurally, the Atlas Development Company application followed the county's standard site plan
review process. After extensive review, staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning
Commission approve the site plan application subject to conditions, including a condition that the
applicant obtain a DEP coastal construction control line permit for the pool and a separate condition
that the applicant provide documentation showing that the building meets the 35 building height
limitation. After considering comments from the public and the applicant, the Commission voted 6 -
1 to approve the site plan.
• Appellants' Concerns
The appellants have raised three specific areas of concern. These three concerns relate to:
• emergency services issues
• the effects of the proposed development on surrounding properties, based on the size
and scope of the proposed development
• erosion issues related to those proposed improvements (e.g. portion of the pool)
proposed to be located seaward of the 1987 CCCL
These concerns are addressed in the analysis portion of this report.
ANALYSIS:
The county's land development regulations (LDRs) provide criteria for the Board to use in its review
of the appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision on the site plan application. These
criteria, based on LDR section 902.07 (see attachment #5), are as follows:
(1) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to follow the appropriate review
procedures?
(2) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner?
i
(3) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of
the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public
health, safety and welfare?
(4) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to evaluate the application with
respect to the comprehensive plan and land development regulations of Indian River
County?
The Board is to consider each of these criteria and make findings in all 4 areas addressed by the
criteria. Staffs analysis of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision in regard to the 4
criteria is as follows:
April 3, 2001
OK 1 17 PG 15 6z
0
1
(1) Did the Commission fail to follow the appropriate review procedures?
T
- The staff s position is that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail
to follow appropriate review procedures. The Commission considered the
application at a regularly scheduled meeting, heard comments from staff and
all interested parties, and had lengthy discussion before making a decision.
The motion was properly made, and a vote was taken as reflected in the
meeting minutes (see attachment #2). In addition, proper timeframes and
procedures have been followed regarding this appeal. Procedurally, me
Commission appears to have conducted an appropriate review of the
application.
t(2) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner?
Staffs opinion is that the Commission did not act in an arbitrary or
capricious manner. During consideration of the site plan application, the
Commission heard staff s presentation. The Commission then questioned
staff regarding a number of technical matters, including building height,
emergency services issues, and erosion. The Commission also heard
presentations from all concerned parties and asked questions of those various
parties. The Commission then discussed various aspects of the plan in its
deliberations. and considered all of the information presented. In fact, one of
the Commissioners asked the deputy county attorney how much latitude and
discretion the Commission had on this type of application. The attorney
# indicated that, if a site plan met the regulations, then it should be approved.
While several Commission members indicated that they felt the development
(' may not be appropriate in this location, they concluded that the site plan did
meet the LDRs, and they supported the motion to approve the site plan.
Thus, the Commission's decision was based on its finding that the application
met the LDRs and on legal advice that approval was required if the LDRs
were met.
(3) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of
the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public
health, safety and welfare?
- The Planning and Zoning Commission heard from a representative of the
adjacent property owner (the Browns), as well as a representative of the
North Barrier Island Civic Association regarding effects that the proposed
development could have on the surrounding properties. Most of the
comments made were about the scale of the building, dune erosion in the
area, and emergency services access to the proposed building.
Prior to the representative for the adjacent property owners expressing these
concerns, a Commissioner expressed some similar concerns related to
Emergency Services access and on-site circulation under the proposed site
plan design. In response to that concern, staff explained that the Fire
Division does review site plans for design issues such as vehicular access,
building separation, building height, fire hydrant locations, and fire flow. At
a later part of the development review process, the Fire Division reviews the
project building permit plans for building related life/safety code issues such
as proper means of egress, interior fire separation, sprinkler systems, smoke
alarms, and materials used. At the Commission meeting, planning staff
April 3, 2001
63
8K I 1 7 PG 5 !
1
(1) Did the Commission fail to follow the appropriate review procedures?
T
- The staff s position is that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail
to follow appropriate review procedures. The Commission considered the
application at a regularly scheduled meeting, heard comments from staff and
all interested parties, and had lengthy discussion before making a decision.
The motion was properly made, and a vote was taken as reflected in the
meeting minutes (see attachment #2). In addition, proper timeframes and
procedures have been followed regarding this appeal. Procedurally, me
Commission appears to have conducted an appropriate review of the
application.
t(2) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner?
Staffs opinion is that the Commission did not act in an arbitrary or
capricious manner. During consideration of the site plan application, the
Commission heard staff s presentation. The Commission then questioned
staff regarding a number of technical matters, including building height,
emergency services issues, and erosion. The Commission also heard
presentations from all concerned parties and asked questions of those various
parties. The Commission then discussed various aspects of the plan in its
deliberations. and considered all of the information presented. In fact, one of
the Commissioners asked the deputy county attorney how much latitude and
discretion the Commission had on this type of application. The attorney
# indicated that, if a site plan met the regulations, then it should be approved.
While several Commission members indicated that they felt the development
(' may not be appropriate in this location, they concluded that the site plan did
meet the LDRs, and they supported the motion to approve the site plan.
Thus, the Commission's decision was based on its finding that the application
met the LDRs and on legal advice that approval was required if the LDRs
were met.
(3) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of
the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public
health, safety and welfare?
- The Planning and Zoning Commission heard from a representative of the
adjacent property owner (the Browns), as well as a representative of the
North Barrier Island Civic Association regarding effects that the proposed
development could have on the surrounding properties. Most of the
comments made were about the scale of the building, dune erosion in the
area, and emergency services access to the proposed building.
Prior to the representative for the adjacent property owners expressing these
concerns, a Commissioner expressed some similar concerns related to
Emergency Services access and on-site circulation under the proposed site
plan design. In response to that concern, staff explained that the Fire
Division does review site plans for design issues such as vehicular access,
building separation, building height, fire hydrant locations, and fire flow. At
a later part of the development review process, the Fire Division reviews the
project building permit plans for building related life/safety code issues such
as proper means of egress, interior fire separation, sprinkler systems, smoke
alarms, and materials used. At the Commission meeting, planning staff
April 3, 2001
63
8K I 1 7 PG 5 !
1
(1) Did the Commission fail to follow the appropriate review procedures?
T
- The staff s position is that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail
to follow appropriate review procedures. The Commission considered the
application at a regularly scheduled meeting, heard comments from staff and
all interested parties, and had lengthy discussion before making a decision.
The motion was properly made, and a vote was taken as reflected in the
meeting minutes (see attachment #2). In addition, proper timeframes and
procedures have been followed regarding this appeal. Procedurally, me
Commission appears to have conducted an appropriate review of the
application.
t(2) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission act in an arbitrary or capricious manner?
Staffs opinion is that the Commission did not act in an arbitrary or
capricious manner. During consideration of the site plan application, the
Commission heard staff s presentation. The Commission then questioned
staff regarding a number of technical matters, including building height,
emergency services issues, and erosion. The Commission also heard
presentations from all concerned parties and asked questions of those various
parties. The Commission then discussed various aspects of the plan in its
deliberations. and considered all of the information presented. In fact, one of
the Commissioners asked the deputy county attorney how much latitude and
discretion the Commission had on this type of application. The attorney
# indicated that, if a site plan met the regulations, then it should be approved.
While several Commission members indicated that they felt the development
(' may not be appropriate in this location, they concluded that the site plan did
meet the LDRs, and they supported the motion to approve the site plan.
Thus, the Commission's decision was based on its finding that the application
met the LDRs and on legal advice that approval was required if the LDRs
were met.
(3) Did the Planning and Zoning Commission fail to consider adequately the effects of
the proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation or public
health, safety and welfare?
- The Planning and Zoning Commission heard from a representative of the
adjacent property owner (the Browns), as well as a representative of the
North Barrier Island Civic Association regarding effects that the proposed
development could have on the surrounding properties. Most of the
comments made were about the scale of the building, dune erosion in the
area, and emergency services access to the proposed building.
Prior to the representative for the adjacent property owners expressing these
concerns, a Commissioner expressed some similar concerns related to
Emergency Services access and on-site circulation under the proposed site
plan design. In response to that concern, staff explained that the Fire
Division does review site plans for design issues such as vehicular access,
building separation, building height, fire hydrant locations, and fire flow. At
a later part of the development review process, the Fire Division reviews the
project building permit plans for building related life/safety code issues such
as proper means of egress, interior fire separation, sprinkler systems, smoke
alarms, and materials used. At the Commission meeting, planning staff
April 3, 2001
63
8K I 1 7 PG 5 !
indicated that such a proper site plan review had been conducted by the Fire
Division and that Fire Division staff indicated they-had_no objection to site -
plan approval. Later in the Commission meeting, the project engineer
confirmed the Fire Division's "sign -off'. Subsequent to the Commission
meeting, the Fire Division provided a letter indicating that the site plan
related emergency services issues had been addressed, confirming the
information conveyed by the staff and applicant to the Commission.
Relative to the erosion concern, the Commission was supplied technical
information regarding the rate of erosion in he area since 1972.
Te
Commission in making its decision considered this information, along with
the fact that the site plan locates most of he improvements landward of the
1987 CCCL. Based on he appeal letters, the erosion issue still seems to be
a concern with the appellants, even though the erosion data show that the
proposed building and pool improvements are located landward of the 30
year erosion line.
Thus, he record indicates that he Commission did consider the effects of the
Proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation, safetv
and welfare.
Recently, staff was informed by the applicant's engineer that the engineer
may submit a revised site plan which would move all improvements
(including the proposed pool) landward of he 1987 CCCL to address the
erosion concern even further. As of the writing of this report, no such plan
modification has been submitted.
(4) Did the Commission fail to evaluate the application
comprehensive plan and land development regulations ons of Indian RiverPCountov?the
- The appellants contend that the Commission failed in this area
because the
Commission approved a plan that maximizes density on the barrier island,
and that such density is inconsistent with he comprehensive
the applicants contend that the Commission did nota thplan. Secondly,
t its decision allows construction of a building whichisout of scale w th he
area and negatively impacts adjoining properties.
For various reasons, the comprehensive plan prohibits high densities on the
barrier island. In fact, some properties on the north barrier island located
north of the Town of Orchid were, in 1991, redesignated from L-2 (up to 6
units/acres) to L-1 (up to 3 units/acres). The subject property is south of the
Town of Orchid and remains L-2 (up to 6 units/acres). The proposed density
is consistent with the comprehensive plan land use designation, and the site's
RM -4 zoning. The density and use issues were examined by the Commission
which concluded that, although much of the surrounding property has
developed as single-family rather than multi -family, the site plan is consistent
with the site's land use designation and zoning.
The three concerns raised by the appellants are addressed by the county LDRs as follows:
April 3, 2001
64
PG b 2
indicated that such a proper site plan review had been conducted by the Fire
Division and that Fire Division staff indicated they-had_no objection to site -
plan approval. Later in the Commission meeting, the project engineer
confirmed the Fire Division's "sign -off'. Subsequent to the Commission
meeting, the Fire Division provided a letter indicating that the site plan
related emergency services issues had been addressed, confirming the
information conveyed by the staff and applicant to the Commission.
Relative to the erosion concern, the Commission was supplied technical
information regarding the rate of erosion in he area since 1972.
Te
Commission in making its decision considered this information, along with
the fact that the site plan locates most of he improvements landward of the
1987 CCCL. Based on he appeal letters, the erosion issue still seems to be
a concern with the appellants, even though the erosion data show that the
proposed building and pool improvements are located landward of the 30
year erosion line.
Thus, he record indicates that he Commission did consider the effects of the
Proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation, safetv
and welfare.
Recently, staff was informed by the applicant's engineer that the engineer
may submit a revised site plan which would move all improvements
(including the proposed pool) landward of he 1987 CCCL to address the
erosion concern even further. As of the writing of this report, no such plan
modification has been submitted.
(4) Did the Commission fail to evaluate the application
comprehensive plan and land development regulations ons of Indian RiverPCountov?the
- The appellants contend that the Commission failed in this area
because the
Commission approved a plan that maximizes density on the barrier island,
and that such density is inconsistent with he comprehensive
the applicants contend that the Commission did nota thplan. Secondly,
t its decision allows construction of a building whichisout of scale w th he
area and negatively impacts adjoining properties.
For various reasons, the comprehensive plan prohibits high densities on the
barrier island. In fact, some properties on the north barrier island located
north of the Town of Orchid were, in 1991, redesignated from L-2 (up to 6
units/acres) to L-1 (up to 3 units/acres). The subject property is south of the
Town of Orchid and remains L-2 (up to 6 units/acres). The proposed density
is consistent with the comprehensive plan land use designation, and the site's
RM -4 zoning. The density and use issues were examined by the Commission
which concluded that, although much of the surrounding property has
developed as single-family rather than multi -family, the site plan is consistent
with the site's land use designation and zoning.
The three concerns raised by the appellants are addressed by the county LDRs as follows:
April 3, 2001
64
PG b 2
indicated that such a proper site plan review had been conducted by the Fire
Division and that Fire Division staff indicated they-had_no objection to site -
plan approval. Later in the Commission meeting, the project engineer
confirmed the Fire Division's "sign -off'. Subsequent to the Commission
meeting, the Fire Division provided a letter indicating that the site plan
related emergency services issues had been addressed, confirming the
information conveyed by the staff and applicant to the Commission.
Relative to the erosion concern, the Commission was supplied technical
information regarding the rate of erosion in he area since 1972.
Te
Commission in making its decision considered this information, along with
the fact that the site plan locates most of he improvements landward of the
1987 CCCL. Based on he appeal letters, the erosion issue still seems to be
a concern with the appellants, even though the erosion data show that the
proposed building and pool improvements are located landward of the 30
year erosion line.
Thus, he record indicates that he Commission did consider the effects of the
Proposed development upon surrounding properties, traffic circulation, safetv
and welfare.
Recently, staff was informed by the applicant's engineer that the engineer
may submit a revised site plan which would move all improvements
(including the proposed pool) landward of he 1987 CCCL to address the
erosion concern even further. As of the writing of this report, no such plan
modification has been submitted.
(4) Did the Commission fail to evaluate the application
comprehensive plan and land development regulations ons of Indian RiverPCountov?the
- The appellants contend that the Commission failed in this area
because the
Commission approved a plan that maximizes density on the barrier island,
and that such density is inconsistent with he comprehensive
the applicants contend that the Commission did nota thplan. Secondly,
t its decision allows construction of a building whichisout of scale w th he
area and negatively impacts adjoining properties.
For various reasons, the comprehensive plan prohibits high densities on the
barrier island. In fact, some properties on the north barrier island located
north of the Town of Orchid were, in 1991, redesignated from L-2 (up to 6
units/acres) to L-1 (up to 3 units/acres). The subject property is south of the
Town of Orchid and remains L-2 (up to 6 units/acres). The proposed density
is consistent with the comprehensive plan land use designation, and the site's
RM -4 zoning. The density and use issues were examined by the Commission
which concluded that, although much of the surrounding property has
developed as single-family rather than multi -family, the site plan is consistent
with the site's land use designation and zoning.
The three concerns raised by the appellants are addressed by the county LDRs as follows:
April 3, 2001
64
PG b 2
Emergency services issues:
The Fire Code has specific criteria related to vehicular access, building separation,
fire hydrant locations, and fire flow which have been reviewed and approved by the
Fire Division for this site plan application (see attachment #4). Also, pursuant to
normal procedures, the Fire Division will also review the more detailed building
permit plans when those plans are submitted. Therefore, the site plan application has
been approved by the Fire Division for site plan level design issues. Such approval
ensures that applicable Fire Code Standards are satisfied. In addition, no building
permit will be issued unless and until the Fire Division signs off on building permit
plans.
• Effects the proposed development has on surrounding properties, based on the size and scope
of the proposed development.
The County LDRs contain "intensity" and "scale" criteria related to building height,
building coverage, setbacks and density. For the subject site, those requirements are
contained in the RM -4 zoning district standards. All applicable county land
development regulations have been applied in regard to the intensity and scale of
the proposed development. Thus, the site plan application meets all density, open
space, building coverage, and setback standards. In addition, one of the
Commission's conditions of approval is structured to ensure compliance with the
county's building height requirements. Therefore, the application, with the
Commission's approval condition, meets all intensity and scale requirements
applicable to the subject site.
• Erosion issues based on some improvements (e.g. portion of the pool) being located seaward
of the 1987 CCCL.
The Commission attached a condition to its site plan approval to ensure review and
approval by the state DEP for any project improvements located seaward of the 1987
CCCL. In addition, information presented to the Commission indicated that all
proposed improvements were to be located landward of the site's 30 -year erosion
line. The project appears to be able to meet applicable state coastal construction
requirements, and the Commission attached a condition to ensure compliance with
those requirements. Therefore, the application and Commission conditions
adequately address the coastal erosion issue under the rules governing the proposed
project.
In staff's opinion the application, combined with the Commission's approval conditions, adequately
addressed the 3 issues of concern within the constraints governing the review of permitted uses, such
as the proposed condominium building.
SUMMARY
In summary, the Commission's decision has met all 4 of the review criteria. There is no specific
LDR provision that has been cited with which the application can be found to be inconsistent. As
indicated by the Deputy County Attorney at the February 22, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting, a permitted use should be approved if the LDRs are met (see attachment #2, page 9 of
Planning and Zoning Commission minutes). Because the proposed condominium building is a
permitted use on the subject site, and because the project site plan with the attached approval
conditions meets all applicable LDR requirements, the application should be approved. Therefore,
the Planning and Zoning Commission made the proper decision in granting site plan approval with
conditions.
April 3, 2001
65
Emergency services issues:
The Fire Code has specific criteria related to vehicular access, building separation,
fire hydrant locations, and fire flow which have been reviewed and approved by the
Fire Division for this site plan application (see attachment #4). Also, pursuant to
normal procedures, the Fire Division will also review the more detailed building
permit plans when those plans are submitted. Therefore, the site plan application has
been approved by the Fire Division for site plan level design issues. Such approval
ensures that applicable Fire Code Standards are satisfied. In addition, no building
permit will be issued unless and until the Fire Division signs off on building permit
plans.
• Effects the proposed development has on surrounding properties, based on the size and scope
of the proposed development.
The County LDRs contain "intensity" and "scale" criteria related to building height,
building coverage, setbacks and density. For the subject site, those requirements are
contained in the RM -4 zoning district standards. All applicable county land
development regulations have been applied in regard to the intensity and scale of
the proposed development. Thus, the site plan application meets all density, open
space, building coverage, and setback standards. In addition, one of the
Commission's conditions of approval is structured to ensure compliance with the
county's building height requirements. Therefore, the application, with the
Commission's approval condition, meets all intensity and scale requirements
applicable to the subject site.
• Erosion issues based on some improvements (e.g. portion of the pool) being located seaward
of the 1987 CCCL.
The Commission attached a condition to its site plan approval to ensure review and
approval by the state DEP for any project improvements located seaward of the 1987
CCCL. In addition, information presented to the Commission indicated that all
proposed improvements were to be located landward of the site's 30 -year erosion
line. The project appears to be able to meet applicable state coastal construction
requirements, and the Commission attached a condition to ensure compliance with
those requirements. Therefore, the application and Commission conditions
adequately address the coastal erosion issue under the rules governing the proposed
project.
In staff's opinion the application, combined with the Commission's approval conditions, adequately
addressed the 3 issues of concern within the constraints governing the review of permitted uses, such
as the proposed condominium building.
SUMMARY
In summary, the Commission's decision has met all 4 of the review criteria. There is no specific
LDR provision that has been cited with which the application can be found to be inconsistent. As
indicated by the Deputy County Attorney at the February 22, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting, a permitted use should be approved if the LDRs are met (see attachment #2, page 9 of
Planning and Zoning Commission minutes). Because the proposed condominium building is a
permitted use on the subject site, and because the project site plan with the attached approval
conditions meets all applicable LDR requirements, the application should be approved. Therefore,
the Planning and Zoning Commission made the proper decision in granting site plan approval with
conditions.
April 3, 2001
65
Emergency services issues:
The Fire Code has specific criteria related to vehicular access, building separation,
fire hydrant locations, and fire flow which have been reviewed and approved by the
Fire Division for this site plan application (see attachment #4). Also, pursuant to
normal procedures, the Fire Division will also review the more detailed building
permit plans when those plans are submitted. Therefore, the site plan application has
been approved by the Fire Division for site plan level design issues. Such approval
ensures that applicable Fire Code Standards are satisfied. In addition, no building
permit will be issued unless and until the Fire Division signs off on building permit
plans.
• Effects the proposed development has on surrounding properties, based on the size and scope
of the proposed development.
The County LDRs contain "intensity" and "scale" criteria related to building height,
building coverage, setbacks and density. For the subject site, those requirements are
contained in the RM -4 zoning district standards. All applicable county land
development regulations have been applied in regard to the intensity and scale of
the proposed development. Thus, the site plan application meets all density, open
space, building coverage, and setback standards. In addition, one of the
Commission's conditions of approval is structured to ensure compliance with the
county's building height requirements. Therefore, the application, with the
Commission's approval condition, meets all intensity and scale requirements
applicable to the subject site.
• Erosion issues based on some improvements (e.g. portion of the pool) being located seaward
of the 1987 CCCL.
The Commission attached a condition to its site plan approval to ensure review and
approval by the state DEP for any project improvements located seaward of the 1987
CCCL. In addition, information presented to the Commission indicated that all
proposed improvements were to be located landward of the site's 30 -year erosion
line. The project appears to be able to meet applicable state coastal construction
requirements, and the Commission attached a condition to ensure compliance with
those requirements. Therefore, the application and Commission conditions
adequately address the coastal erosion issue under the rules governing the proposed
project.
In staff's opinion the application, combined with the Commission's approval conditions, adequately
addressed the 3 issues of concern within the constraints governing the review of permitted uses, such
as the proposed condominium building.
SUMMARY
In summary, the Commission's decision has met all 4 of the review criteria. There is no specific
LDR provision that has been cited with which the application can be found to be inconsistent. As
indicated by the Deputy County Attorney at the February 22, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting, a permitted use should be approved if the LDRs are met (see attachment #2, page 9 of
Planning and Zoning Commission minutes). Because the proposed condominium building is a
permitted use on the subject site, and because the project site plan with the attached approval
conditions meets all applicable LDR requirements, the application should be approved. Therefore,
the Planning and Zoning Commission made the proper decision in granting site plan approval with
conditions.
April 3, 2001
65
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Find that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail in any of the 4 appeal
review criteria areas, and,
(2) Deny the appeals, and,
(3) Uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision to approve the Atlas
Development major site plan application with conditions.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Appeal Letters
2. Staff Report with Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
3. January 16" Board of County Commission Minutes
4. Review memo from the Fire Division
Director Boling stressed this was the third site plan the Board has seen for this site
and showed the previous two site plans during the presentation. On the previous afternoon,
the applicant submitted to staff an administrative approval application that would pull all of
the pool and pool decking landward of the 1987 CCCL (coastal construction control line).
Having received the new plan just the day before the meeting, it had not been processed
pending the Board's decision. The Board could condition site plan approval, and apparently
the applicant would have no objection having a condition that all pool and decking structures
be pulled back landward of the 1987 CCCL.
Director Boling responded to several questions and concerns of the Commissioners
regarding building height, setbacks, as well as present and new requirements for emergency
vehicles. He also addressed questions about the depth of the garage level.
Discussion was held on whether or not this site plan would be subject to the new fire
codes and the height of the structure.
William G. Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, Vero Beach, president of the North Beach
Civic Association, president of the Summerplace Improvement Association, and a member
of the North Beach Civic Association, spoke about the designation of AIA as an historic
April 3, 2001
es
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Find that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail in any of the 4 appeal
review criteria areas, and,
(2) Deny the appeals, and,
(3) Uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision to approve the Atlas
Development major site plan application with conditions.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Appeal Letters
2. Staff Report with Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
3. January 16" Board of County Commission Minutes
4. Review memo from the Fire Division
Director Boling stressed this was the third site plan the Board has seen for this site
and showed the previous two site plans during the presentation. On the previous afternoon,
the applicant submitted to staff an administrative approval application that would pull all of
the pool and pool decking landward of the 1987 CCCL (coastal construction control line).
Having received the new plan just the day before the meeting, it had not been processed
pending the Board's decision. The Board could condition site plan approval, and apparently
the applicant would have no objection having a condition that all pool and decking structures
be pulled back landward of the 1987 CCCL.
Director Boling responded to several questions and concerns of the Commissioners
regarding building height, setbacks, as well as present and new requirements for emergency
vehicles. He also addressed questions about the depth of the garage level.
Discussion was held on whether or not this site plan would be subject to the new fire
codes and the height of the structure.
William G. Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, Vero Beach, president of the North Beach
Civic Association, president of the Summerplace Improvement Association, and a member
of the North Beach Civic Association, spoke about the designation of AIA as an historic
April 3, 2001
es
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Find that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not fail in any of the 4 appeal
review criteria areas, and,
(2) Deny the appeals, and,
(3) Uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision to approve the Atlas
Development major site plan application with conditions.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Appeal Letters
2. Staff Report with Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
3. January 16" Board of County Commission Minutes
4. Review memo from the Fire Division
Director Boling stressed this was the third site plan the Board has seen for this site
and showed the previous two site plans during the presentation. On the previous afternoon,
the applicant submitted to staff an administrative approval application that would pull all of
the pool and pool decking landward of the 1987 CCCL (coastal construction control line).
Having received the new plan just the day before the meeting, it had not been processed
pending the Board's decision. The Board could condition site plan approval, and apparently
the applicant would have no objection having a condition that all pool and decking structures
be pulled back landward of the 1987 CCCL.
Director Boling responded to several questions and concerns of the Commissioners
regarding building height, setbacks, as well as present and new requirements for emergency
vehicles. He also addressed questions about the depth of the garage level.
Discussion was held on whether or not this site plan would be subject to the new fire
codes and the height of the structure.
William G. Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, Vero Beach, president of the North Beach
Civic Association, president of the Summerplace Improvement Association, and a member
of the North Beach Civic Association, spoke about the designation of AIA as an historic
April 3, 2001
es
scenic highway and how this new development would negatively impact the look of the
highway and neighborhood. He compared the proposed condo building to the U.S. Trust
Building on Beachland Boulevard, which caused the City of Vero Beach to immediately
began changing their setbacks. He showed photographs with drawings superimposed to
indicate how the condo building would look from AIA. He felt this is the beginning of the
possible destruction of the area. He credited the Board with having beautified CR510 and
built an outstanding fire station and spoke of Federal grants which are to be received to
beautify the area based on the scenic highway designation. He predicted the building will
tower over A 1 A, Sandalwood Road, Summerplace, Oceanaire, and the Town of Orchid. At
the most recent meeting of the NBCA meeting about 100 people showed up whose reaction
was "this cannot happen." He asked the Commissioners to imagine this 55 -foot condo
building towering over the homes of 20 -25 -foot height. He expressed concern about their
property values and their way of life. He stated the developer is doing something that is
offensive to our community standards and not in the public interest. He spoke of the new
Fire Prevention Code which is scheduled to go into effect July 1, 2001 and stated this new
building would barely meet the existing fire code. He pointed out that fire trucks cannot go
along the sides of the building. Moving the building westward cures one problem, but will
create another problem for right-of-way along A IA in the future. People who live there will
have "traffic right under their noses in years to come." He cited and read Indian River
County Code Section 902.07(4)c having to do with public health, safety and welfare. He felt
this was a concern that has not been properly considered. He submitted that this condo will
have a tremendously adverse affect on community standards and public interest in the north
beach area and could lead to the destruction of a unique neighborhood. He stressed that an
elected body's role is to protect the public interest and asked the Board to uphold the appeal
in this matter. He advised that Attorney Chester Clem, who represents the Browns in this
matter, could not be present. Mr. Glynn advised that he may wish to speak on the Browns'
April 3, 2001
67
Ut1 bn 755
scenic highway and how this new development would negatively impact the look of the
highway and neighborhood. He compared the proposed condo building to the U.S. Trust
Building on Beachland Boulevard, which caused the City of Vero Beach to immediately
began changing their setbacks. He showed photographs with drawings superimposed to
indicate how the condo building would look from AIA. He felt this is the beginning of the
possible destruction of the area. He credited the Board with having beautified CR510 and
built an outstanding fire station and spoke of Federal grants which are to be received to
beautify the area based on the scenic highway designation. He predicted the building will
tower over A 1 A, Sandalwood Road, Summerplace, Oceanaire, and the Town of Orchid. At
the most recent meeting of the NBCA meeting about 100 people showed up whose reaction
was "this cannot happen." He asked the Commissioners to imagine this 55 -foot condo
building towering over the homes of 20 -25 -foot height. He expressed concern about their
property values and their way of life. He stated the developer is doing something that is
offensive to our community standards and not in the public interest. He spoke of the new
Fire Prevention Code which is scheduled to go into effect July 1, 2001 and stated this new
building would barely meet the existing fire code. He pointed out that fire trucks cannot go
along the sides of the building. Moving the building westward cures one problem, but will
create another problem for right-of-way along A IA in the future. People who live there will
have "traffic right under their noses in years to come." He cited and read Indian River
County Code Section 902.07(4)c having to do with public health, safety and welfare. He felt
this was a concern that has not been properly considered. He submitted that this condo will
have a tremendously adverse affect on community standards and public interest in the north
beach area and could lead to the destruction of a unique neighborhood. He stressed that an
elected body's role is to protect the public interest and asked the Board to uphold the appeal
in this matter. He advised that Attorney Chester Clem, who represents the Browns in this
matter, could not be present. Mr. Glynn advised that he may wish to speak on the Browns'
April 3, 2001
67
Ut1 bn 755
scenic highway and how this new development would negatively impact the look of the
highway and neighborhood. He compared the proposed condo building to the U.S. Trust
Building on Beachland Boulevard, which caused the City of Vero Beach to immediately
began changing their setbacks. He showed photographs with drawings superimposed to
indicate how the condo building would look from AIA. He felt this is the beginning of the
possible destruction of the area. He credited the Board with having beautified CR510 and
built an outstanding fire station and spoke of Federal grants which are to be received to
beautify the area based on the scenic highway designation. He predicted the building will
tower over A 1 A, Sandalwood Road, Summerplace, Oceanaire, and the Town of Orchid. At
the most recent meeting of the NBCA meeting about 100 people showed up whose reaction
was "this cannot happen." He asked the Commissioners to imagine this 55 -foot condo
building towering over the homes of 20 -25 -foot height. He expressed concern about their
property values and their way of life. He stated the developer is doing something that is
offensive to our community standards and not in the public interest. He spoke of the new
Fire Prevention Code which is scheduled to go into effect July 1, 2001 and stated this new
building would barely meet the existing fire code. He pointed out that fire trucks cannot go
along the sides of the building. Moving the building westward cures one problem, but will
create another problem for right-of-way along A IA in the future. People who live there will
have "traffic right under their noses in years to come." He cited and read Indian River
County Code Section 902.07(4)c having to do with public health, safety and welfare. He felt
this was a concern that has not been properly considered. He submitted that this condo will
have a tremendously adverse affect on community standards and public interest in the north
beach area and could lead to the destruction of a unique neighborhood. He stressed that an
elected body's role is to protect the public interest and asked the Board to uphold the appeal
in this matter. He advised that Attorney Chester Clem, who represents the Browns in this
matter, could not be present. Mr. Glynn advised that he may wish to speak on the Browns'
April 3, 2001
67
Ut1 bn 755
behalf later.
Gail Nye, 9410 Frangipani Drive, has been employed as a fire suppression lieutenant
in Palm Beach County for the past 1 L years. Her plea _opposing the plan of _Atlas
Development Group was evidenced by the petitions with approximately 100 signatures she
collected recently. (Clerk's Note: These petitions were presented and have been placed on
file with the backup for the meeting.) The character of the community does not include
multi -family or "high-rise" structures and people who moved into Summerplace and
Oceanaire did not expect it to happen. She felt this would be opening the door for similar
developments to impose on their way of living in this corner of Indian River County.
Chairman Ginn ruled out of order Ms. Nye's request for supporters in the audience to stand.
She invited the Commissioners to visit their neighborhood to see how they would think this
would impact their community. Concerning fire apparatus being able to reach this area, she
advised how difficult it is to turn around these large vehicles. She thought there would be
no room for two pumpers, a rescue truck and a ladder for a first alarm assignment. The # 1
cause of death for firefighters is building collapse and it would be quite a squeeze for the
small area. If the building was on fire and collapsed, firefighters would suffer. She thought
community standards should supercede property rights and urged the Board to not allow this
building next to Summerplace.
Sara Cauley advised that her home for 25 years is about 14 feet in height and is
located directly across Sandalwood Road from the proposed "monstrosity."
Bob Bruce, 12396 North AIA, is the chairperson of the North Beach Corridor Task
Force and vice president of the North Beach Civic Association. He asked the Board to think
about the "image" of the county on north Orchid Island. He asked that they envision how
this proposed building will look next to a scenic highway and near two national wildlife
refuges.
Rodney C. Williams, resident in Summerplace, is an architect registered in Vermont,
April 3, 2001
68
I 17 PG 756
behalf later.
Gail Nye, 9410 Frangipani Drive, has been employed as a fire suppression lieutenant
in Palm Beach County for the past 1 L years. Her plea _opposing the plan of _Atlas
Development Group was evidenced by the petitions with approximately 100 signatures she
collected recently. (Clerk's Note: These petitions were presented and have been placed on
file with the backup for the meeting.) The character of the community does not include
multi -family or "high-rise" structures and people who moved into Summerplace and
Oceanaire did not expect it to happen. She felt this would be opening the door for similar
developments to impose on their way of living in this corner of Indian River County.
Chairman Ginn ruled out of order Ms. Nye's request for supporters in the audience to stand.
She invited the Commissioners to visit their neighborhood to see how they would think this
would impact their community. Concerning fire apparatus being able to reach this area, she
advised how difficult it is to turn around these large vehicles. She thought there would be
no room for two pumpers, a rescue truck and a ladder for a first alarm assignment. The # 1
cause of death for firefighters is building collapse and it would be quite a squeeze for the
small area. If the building was on fire and collapsed, firefighters would suffer. She thought
community standards should supercede property rights and urged the Board to not allow this
building next to Summerplace.
Sara Cauley advised that her home for 25 years is about 14 feet in height and is
located directly across Sandalwood Road from the proposed "monstrosity."
Bob Bruce, 12396 North AIA, is the chairperson of the North Beach Corridor Task
Force and vice president of the North Beach Civic Association. He asked the Board to think
about the "image" of the county on north Orchid Island. He asked that they envision how
this proposed building will look next to a scenic highway and near two national wildlife
refuges.
Rodney C. Williams, resident in Summerplace, is an architect registered in Vermont,
April 3, 2001
68
I 17 PG 756
behalf later.
Gail Nye, 9410 Frangipani Drive, has been employed as a fire suppression lieutenant
in Palm Beach County for the past 1 L years. Her plea _opposing the plan of _Atlas
Development Group was evidenced by the petitions with approximately 100 signatures she
collected recently. (Clerk's Note: These petitions were presented and have been placed on
file with the backup for the meeting.) The character of the community does not include
multi -family or "high-rise" structures and people who moved into Summerplace and
Oceanaire did not expect it to happen. She felt this would be opening the door for similar
developments to impose on their way of living in this corner of Indian River County.
Chairman Ginn ruled out of order Ms. Nye's request for supporters in the audience to stand.
She invited the Commissioners to visit their neighborhood to see how they would think this
would impact their community. Concerning fire apparatus being able to reach this area, she
advised how difficult it is to turn around these large vehicles. She thought there would be
no room for two pumpers, a rescue truck and a ladder for a first alarm assignment. The # 1
cause of death for firefighters is building collapse and it would be quite a squeeze for the
small area. If the building was on fire and collapsed, firefighters would suffer. She thought
community standards should supercede property rights and urged the Board to not allow this
building next to Summerplace.
Sara Cauley advised that her home for 25 years is about 14 feet in height and is
located directly across Sandalwood Road from the proposed "monstrosity."
Bob Bruce, 12396 North AIA, is the chairperson of the North Beach Corridor Task
Force and vice president of the North Beach Civic Association. He asked the Board to think
about the "image" of the county on north Orchid Island. He asked that they envision how
this proposed building will look next to a scenic highway and near two national wildlife
refuges.
Rodney C. Williams, resident in Summerplace, is an architect registered in Vermont,
April 3, 2001
68
I 17 PG 756
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware who sees this proposed development with an
architectural eye. He predicted the proposed height of the building will destroy the beauty
of A 1 A and the ambiance of the entire area.
Vince Bruno, 9480 Doubloon Drive, spoke against the height of the building
wondering whose home it would fall on should it fall over. He advised that there are
Simpson oaks dispersed throughout that property which are an endangered species. He
wondered if the developers have taken into consideration the erosion problem and if so they
planned to install steel bulkheads which are against Sea Turtle Survival League's
requirements. He asked if they are going to apply for an incidental take on turtles and if they
are aware that process could take 5 or 6 years. He thought "the ambiance of the area should
not be bothered or intruded with this monstrosity." He was certain there are other areas they
could build and let the people live their lives as they have for the last 30 years.
Ralph Evans, attorney for the developer, 3355 Ocean Drive, Vero Beach, wanted to
address concerns and if more are raised, he would like to have the opportunity to address
them as well. He asked Scott McGuire, the engineer on the project, to address some of the
issues raised not only by the appeal but by the Commissioners and the public in relation to
this property. This is the third attempt to develop this site and he was not familiar with the
first one. He advised of some of the particulars of a suit that went to court concerning the
Orchid Dunes overlay.
Scott McGuire, Knight McGuire & Associates, appeared on behalf of Atlas
Development Company. He explained how he had gone about addressing the issues and
concerns. Regarding access for emergency vehicles, he advised they had met with Fire
Prevention Plan Review/Inspection Bureau Chief Dan Dietz and Lt. Dennis Meliti who
reviewed the plan in great detail and the appropriate changes were made. The final design
does meet present fire codes and will also meet the new code and Chief Dietz was present
to address any questions. Concerning the density issue, the proposed use of the property is
April 3, 2001
(I �� 7 5 7
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware who sees this proposed development with an
architectural eye. He predicted the proposed height of the building will destroy the beauty
of A 1 A and the ambiance of the entire area.
Vince Bruno, 9480 Doubloon Drive, spoke against the height of the building
wondering whose home it would fall on should it fall over. He advised that there are
Simpson oaks dispersed throughout that property which are an endangered species. He
wondered if the developers have taken into consideration the erosion problem and if so they
planned to install steel bulkheads which are against Sea Turtle Survival League's
requirements. He asked if they are going to apply for an incidental take on turtles and if they
are aware that process could take 5 or 6 years. He thought "the ambiance of the area should
not be bothered or intruded with this monstrosity." He was certain there are other areas they
could build and let the people live their lives as they have for the last 30 years.
Ralph Evans, attorney for the developer, 3355 Ocean Drive, Vero Beach, wanted to
address concerns and if more are raised, he would like to have the opportunity to address
them as well. He asked Scott McGuire, the engineer on the project, to address some of the
issues raised not only by the appeal but by the Commissioners and the public in relation to
this property. This is the third attempt to develop this site and he was not familiar with the
first one. He advised of some of the particulars of a suit that went to court concerning the
Orchid Dunes overlay.
Scott McGuire, Knight McGuire & Associates, appeared on behalf of Atlas
Development Company. He explained how he had gone about addressing the issues and
concerns. Regarding access for emergency vehicles, he advised they had met with Fire
Prevention Plan Review/Inspection Bureau Chief Dan Dietz and Lt. Dennis Meliti who
reviewed the plan in great detail and the appropriate changes were made. The final design
does meet present fire codes and will also meet the new code and Chief Dietz was present
to address any questions. Concerning the density issue, the proposed use of the property is
April 3, 2001
(I �� 7 5 7
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware who sees this proposed development with an
architectural eye. He predicted the proposed height of the building will destroy the beauty
of A 1 A and the ambiance of the entire area.
Vince Bruno, 9480 Doubloon Drive, spoke against the height of the building
wondering whose home it would fall on should it fall over. He advised that there are
Simpson oaks dispersed throughout that property which are an endangered species. He
wondered if the developers have taken into consideration the erosion problem and if so they
planned to install steel bulkheads which are against Sea Turtle Survival League's
requirements. He asked if they are going to apply for an incidental take on turtles and if they
are aware that process could take 5 or 6 years. He thought "the ambiance of the area should
not be bothered or intruded with this monstrosity." He was certain there are other areas they
could build and let the people live their lives as they have for the last 30 years.
Ralph Evans, attorney for the developer, 3355 Ocean Drive, Vero Beach, wanted to
address concerns and if more are raised, he would like to have the opportunity to address
them as well. He asked Scott McGuire, the engineer on the project, to address some of the
issues raised not only by the appeal but by the Commissioners and the public in relation to
this property. This is the third attempt to develop this site and he was not familiar with the
first one. He advised of some of the particulars of a suit that went to court concerning the
Orchid Dunes overlay.
Scott McGuire, Knight McGuire & Associates, appeared on behalf of Atlas
Development Company. He explained how he had gone about addressing the issues and
concerns. Regarding access for emergency vehicles, he advised they had met with Fire
Prevention Plan Review/Inspection Bureau Chief Dan Dietz and Lt. Dennis Meliti who
reviewed the plan in great detail and the appropriate changes were made. The final design
does meet present fire codes and will also meet the new code and Chief Dietz was present
to address any questions. Concerning the density issue, the proposed use of the property is
April 3, 2001
(I �� 7 5 7
consistent with current and previous regulations and zoning since prior to the establishment
of the Comprehensive Plan. It is a straight site plan which meets the code. Condominium
units fit within RM -4 zoning and are appropriate. They have submitted for administrative
approval a plan to pull the pool behind the 1987 CCCL and the only improvement east of the
1987 CCCL would be a dune access path that would be similar to what is constructed with
single family residences. It is a full 150 feet from the right-of-way line on AIA. The
building code sets forth the building height requirements and the project is in compliance.
The final architectural design documents will be, he thought, very specifically reviewed and
y6
F
it will meet the 35 -foot height limit presently in effect. He offered to answer questions.
In response to Commissioner Adams and others, Mr. McGuire indicated on the site
plan where and how the 7 units would be located above the garages, which provide the
footprint for the structure.
Mr. Evans addressed the two relevant issues, fire and elevation, that were discussed
extensively at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Should the Commission have
any questions of Chief Dietz, he hoped they would take advantage of the fact that he was in
the audience. For the record, he adopted the presentation offered by the County in this
quasi-judicial hearing on behalf of the applicant. He also wished to include in the record the
drawing by staff as well as the letter from the Fire Department. He then reviewed the
standard of a quasi-judicial proceeding that there is substantial competent evidence upon
which the Board could base its decision and, with due respect, he hoped the Commissioners
would not take into consideration the testimony by Mr. Glynn as he felt Mr. Glynn was only
able to give his personal and emotional feeling about what this may do to the scenic road or
his neighborhood. He hoped the Board would weigh the evidence and would consider staff's
recommendation and that the project had been moved landward of the 1987 CCCL. He
believed it was clear that the LDR requirements have been met without compromise other
than the conditions attached to the site plan. He requested they add one more condition that
April 3, 2001
70
consistent with current and previous regulations and zoning since prior to the establishment
of the Comprehensive Plan. It is a straight site plan which meets the code. Condominium
units fit within RM -4 zoning and are appropriate. They have submitted for administrative
approval a plan to pull the pool behind the 1987 CCCL and the only improvement east of the
1987 CCCL would be a dune access path that would be similar to what is constructed with
single family residences. It is a full 150 feet from the right-of-way line on AIA. The
building code sets forth the building height requirements and the project is in compliance.
The final architectural design documents will be, he thought, very specifically reviewed and
y6
F
it will meet the 35 -foot height limit presently in effect. He offered to answer questions.
In response to Commissioner Adams and others, Mr. McGuire indicated on the site
plan where and how the 7 units would be located above the garages, which provide the
footprint for the structure.
Mr. Evans addressed the two relevant issues, fire and elevation, that were discussed
extensively at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Should the Commission have
any questions of Chief Dietz, he hoped they would take advantage of the fact that he was in
the audience. For the record, he adopted the presentation offered by the County in this
quasi-judicial hearing on behalf of the applicant. He also wished to include in the record the
drawing by staff as well as the letter from the Fire Department. He then reviewed the
standard of a quasi-judicial proceeding that there is substantial competent evidence upon
which the Board could base its decision and, with due respect, he hoped the Commissioners
would not take into consideration the testimony by Mr. Glynn as he felt Mr. Glynn was only
able to give his personal and emotional feeling about what this may do to the scenic road or
his neighborhood. He hoped the Board would weigh the evidence and would consider staff's
recommendation and that the project had been moved landward of the 1987 CCCL. He
believed it was clear that the LDR requirements have been met without compromise other
than the conditions attached to the site plan. He requested they add one more condition that
April 3, 2001
70
consistent with current and previous regulations and zoning since prior to the establishment
of the Comprehensive Plan. It is a straight site plan which meets the code. Condominium
units fit within RM -4 zoning and are appropriate. They have submitted for administrative
approval a plan to pull the pool behind the 1987 CCCL and the only improvement east of the
1987 CCCL would be a dune access path that would be similar to what is constructed with
single family residences. It is a full 150 feet from the right-of-way line on AIA. The
building code sets forth the building height requirements and the project is in compliance.
The final architectural design documents will be, he thought, very specifically reviewed and
y6
F
it will meet the 35 -foot height limit presently in effect. He offered to answer questions.
In response to Commissioner Adams and others, Mr. McGuire indicated on the site
plan where and how the 7 units would be located above the garages, which provide the
footprint for the structure.
Mr. Evans addressed the two relevant issues, fire and elevation, that were discussed
extensively at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Should the Commission have
any questions of Chief Dietz, he hoped they would take advantage of the fact that he was in
the audience. For the record, he adopted the presentation offered by the County in this
quasi-judicial hearing on behalf of the applicant. He also wished to include in the record the
drawing by staff as well as the letter from the Fire Department. He then reviewed the
standard of a quasi-judicial proceeding that there is substantial competent evidence upon
which the Board could base its decision and, with due respect, he hoped the Commissioners
would not take into consideration the testimony by Mr. Glynn as he felt Mr. Glynn was only
able to give his personal and emotional feeling about what this may do to the scenic road or
his neighborhood. He hoped the Board would weigh the evidence and would consider staff's
recommendation and that the project had been moved landward of the 1987 CCCL. He
believed it was clear that the LDR requirements have been met without compromise other
than the conditions attached to the site plan. He requested they add one more condition that
April 3, 2001
70
I
the pool be moved landward of the 1987 CCCL. He believed the comparison between the
U.S. Trust Building and the proposed development to be an "apple and orange" comparison.
The multi -family zoning of the property has been in place for a number of years. The issues
of erosion. storms, collapse of buildings, and access by the Fire Department have been
discussed but the most significant thing is that every applicable requirement of the law has
been met and that is what is at stake for this owner who has property rights. In every
instance when he appeared before the PZC the first question asked was, "Can we legally
deny this?" The answer, was "No" the first time, but it was denied anyway. The second
time, after much discussion, the PZC recommended approval.
Mr. Glynn stated that he disagreed with Mr. Evans' interpretation of rP public interest"
which was to comply with the law. Mr. Glynn believed "public interest" was consideration
of the people, their homes, what it will do to an area, and the possibilities of homes burning
down because of improper areas for firefighting equipment. He felt this proposed
P
condominium to be a definite attack on the community standards of the surrounding area.
He acknowledged this was his opinion and that of the other residents on the barrier island
and asked that the Board support the appeal.
Commissioner Adams was struck by the similarity of this issue and the Publix issue
back in 1994. Back then, the Board voted the law and figured it would go to Court either
way but, interestingly, the owners in the Moorings got together, worked out the issue
' ,and
purchased the property. This is the same issue with existing zoning and now it is not
compatible with the way the neighborhood has evolved. This may be one of those times
r
when what is legal is not right.
e
Commissioner Macht thought the Board ought to look at the global community from
CR510 north. He thought law could be modified de facto by what people have done which
is build single-family houses. In his opinion, this would be an anomaly to the Summerplace
area and impinge on its ambiance. He thought it differed from the Publix issue due to
April 3, 2001
71
iT� i l PG 759
I
the pool be moved landward of the 1987 CCCL. He believed the comparison between the
U.S. Trust Building and the proposed development to be an "apple and orange" comparison.
The multi -family zoning of the property has been in place for a number of years. The issues
of erosion. storms, collapse of buildings, and access by the Fire Department have been
discussed but the most significant thing is that every applicable requirement of the law has
been met and that is what is at stake for this owner who has property rights. In every
instance when he appeared before the PZC the first question asked was, "Can we legally
deny this?" The answer, was "No" the first time, but it was denied anyway. The second
time, after much discussion, the PZC recommended approval.
Mr. Glynn stated that he disagreed with Mr. Evans' interpretation of rP public interest"
which was to comply with the law. Mr. Glynn believed "public interest" was consideration
of the people, their homes, what it will do to an area, and the possibilities of homes burning
down because of improper areas for firefighting equipment. He felt this proposed
P
condominium to be a definite attack on the community standards of the surrounding area.
He acknowledged this was his opinion and that of the other residents on the barrier island
and asked that the Board support the appeal.
Commissioner Adams was struck by the similarity of this issue and the Publix issue
back in 1994. Back then, the Board voted the law and figured it would go to Court either
way but, interestingly, the owners in the Moorings got together, worked out the issue
' ,and
purchased the property. This is the same issue with existing zoning and now it is not
compatible with the way the neighborhood has evolved. This may be one of those times
r
when what is legal is not right.
e
Commissioner Macht thought the Board ought to look at the global community from
CR510 north. He thought law could be modified de facto by what people have done which
is build single-family houses. In his opinion, this would be an anomaly to the Summerplace
area and impinge on its ambiance. He thought it differed from the Publix issue due to
April 3, 2001
71
iT� i l PG 759
I
the pool be moved landward of the 1987 CCCL. He believed the comparison between the
U.S. Trust Building and the proposed development to be an "apple and orange" comparison.
The multi -family zoning of the property has been in place for a number of years. The issues
of erosion. storms, collapse of buildings, and access by the Fire Department have been
discussed but the most significant thing is that every applicable requirement of the law has
been met and that is what is at stake for this owner who has property rights. In every
instance when he appeared before the PZC the first question asked was, "Can we legally
deny this?" The answer, was "No" the first time, but it was denied anyway. The second
time, after much discussion, the PZC recommended approval.
Mr. Glynn stated that he disagreed with Mr. Evans' interpretation of rP public interest"
which was to comply with the law. Mr. Glynn believed "public interest" was consideration
of the people, their homes, what it will do to an area, and the possibilities of homes burning
down because of improper areas for firefighting equipment. He felt this proposed
P
condominium to be a definite attack on the community standards of the surrounding area.
He acknowledged this was his opinion and that of the other residents on the barrier island
and asked that the Board support the appeal.
Commissioner Adams was struck by the similarity of this issue and the Publix issue
back in 1994. Back then, the Board voted the law and figured it would go to Court either
way but, interestingly, the owners in the Moorings got together, worked out the issue
' ,and
purchased the property. This is the same issue with existing zoning and now it is not
compatible with the way the neighborhood has evolved. This may be one of those times
r
when what is legal is not right.
e
Commissioner Macht thought the Board ought to look at the global community from
CR510 north. He thought law could be modified de facto by what people have done which
is build single-family houses. In his opinion, this would be an anomaly to the Summerplace
area and impinge on its ambiance. He thought it differed from the Publix issue due to
April 3, 2001
71
iT� i l PG 759
commercial versus another form of residential. He believed the PZC had failed to follow the
appropriate review procedures criteria (1) under Analysis on the third page of staff's
memorandum, in that they looked into thero'ect and not
P J out. He also thought that the
t PZC had failed in number (3) because they did not adequately (emphasis on adequately)
consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding properties because this
condominium would be the one and only of its kind in that area, a non sequitur to the nature
of the neighborhood. He thought that (4) also had some items of concern and it could not
be separated from (3).
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge, to uphold the appeal of the
applicant based on the failures of the PZC to apply items (1) and
(3) to the extent that they could have been applied.
Under discussion, Vice Chairman Stanbridge recalled that back in January Deputy
County Attorney Collins advised that the Board had the discretion to protect the public's
health, safety, and welfare. She understood that to mean the Board has the discretion to go
outside what Mr. Evans considers the legal ramifications to consider other things. She
believed that the PZC did fail to consider adequately the impact of the proposed development
on the surrounding properties which could be concluded, in her opinion, to be the health,
safety, and welfare of the public and the property values the Board was talking about.
Commissioner Tippin wished he did not have to vote on issues such as this. He was
born in the county and lived through hurricanes for 67 years; he would not live there even
if he could afford it. He liked it much better when a 4 -wheel drive vehicle was necessary to
get to Wabasso Beach. He postulated that the law is the law until it is changed and
commented he was in a horrible quandary.
County Attorney Bangel understood the motion was reversing the PZC's decision.
April 3, 2001
� i l b 160
72
commercial versus another form of residential. He believed the PZC had failed to follow the
appropriate review procedures criteria (1) under Analysis on the third page of staff's
memorandum, in that they looked into thero'ect and not
P J out. He also thought that the
t PZC had failed in number (3) because they did not adequately (emphasis on adequately)
consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding properties because this
condominium would be the one and only of its kind in that area, a non sequitur to the nature
of the neighborhood. He thought that (4) also had some items of concern and it could not
be separated from (3).
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge, to uphold the appeal of the
applicant based on the failures of the PZC to apply items (1) and
(3) to the extent that they could have been applied.
Under discussion, Vice Chairman Stanbridge recalled that back in January Deputy
County Attorney Collins advised that the Board had the discretion to protect the public's
health, safety, and welfare. She understood that to mean the Board has the discretion to go
outside what Mr. Evans considers the legal ramifications to consider other things. She
believed that the PZC did fail to consider adequately the impact of the proposed development
on the surrounding properties which could be concluded, in her opinion, to be the health,
safety, and welfare of the public and the property values the Board was talking about.
Commissioner Tippin wished he did not have to vote on issues such as this. He was
born in the county and lived through hurricanes for 67 years; he would not live there even
if he could afford it. He liked it much better when a 4 -wheel drive vehicle was necessary to
get to Wabasso Beach. He postulated that the law is the law until it is changed and
commented he was in a horrible quandary.
County Attorney Bangel understood the motion was reversing the PZC's decision.
April 3, 2001
� i l b 160
72
commercial versus another form of residential. He believed the PZC had failed to follow the
appropriate review procedures criteria (1) under Analysis on the third page of staff's
memorandum, in that they looked into thero'ect and not
P J out. He also thought that the
t PZC had failed in number (3) because they did not adequately (emphasis on adequately)
consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding properties because this
condominium would be the one and only of its kind in that area, a non sequitur to the nature
of the neighborhood. He thought that (4) also had some items of concern and it could not
be separated from (3).
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
BY Vice Chairman Stanbridge, to uphold the appeal of the
applicant based on the failures of the PZC to apply items (1) and
(3) to the extent that they could have been applied.
Under discussion, Vice Chairman Stanbridge recalled that back in January Deputy
County Attorney Collins advised that the Board had the discretion to protect the public's
health, safety, and welfare. She understood that to mean the Board has the discretion to go
outside what Mr. Evans considers the legal ramifications to consider other things. She
believed that the PZC did fail to consider adequately the impact of the proposed development
on the surrounding properties which could be concluded, in her opinion, to be the health,
safety, and welfare of the public and the property values the Board was talking about.
Commissioner Tippin wished he did not have to vote on issues such as this. He was
born in the county and lived through hurricanes for 67 years; he would not live there even
if he could afford it. He liked it much better when a 4 -wheel drive vehicle was necessary to
get to Wabasso Beach. He postulated that the law is the law until it is changed and
commented he was in a horrible quandary.
County Attorney Bangel understood the motion was reversing the PZC's decision.
April 3, 2001
� i l b 160
72
Chainnan Ginn would base her vote on LDR Section 902.07(3). She agreed PZC did
fail to adequately consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding
properties.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Tippin opposed).
The Chairman called a short recess at 10:45 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the
meeting at 10:52 a.m. and all members of the Board of County Commissioners were present.
(CLERK'S NOTE: It was at this point during the meeting that the Chairman called
for Item 9.13.2., those minutes been inserted after 9.13.1.)
11.A.1.
PARD
0
�21il1l u l l "3 ,,r, j ti�!011)h 1110H HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
March 22, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ISI N HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating. AICP
Community Development DFrector
. 7
FROM: Sasan Rohani. AICP x/
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 22, 2001
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)
FUNDS SETASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLIENTS
April 3, 2001
73
•
Chainnan Ginn would base her vote on LDR Section 902.07(3). She agreed PZC did
fail to adequately consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding
properties.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Tippin opposed).
The Chairman called a short recess at 10:45 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the
meeting at 10:52 a.m. and all members of the Board of County Commissioners were present.
(CLERK'S NOTE: It was at this point during the meeting that the Chairman called
for Item 9.13.2., those minutes been inserted after 9.13.1.)
11.A.1.
PARD
0
�21il1l u l l "3 ,,r, j ti�!011)h 1110H HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
March 22, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ISI N HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating. AICP
Community Development DFrector
. 7
FROM: Sasan Rohani. AICP x/
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 22, 2001
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)
FUNDS SETASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLIENTS
April 3, 2001
73
Chainnan Ginn would base her vote on LDR Section 902.07(3). She agreed PZC did
fail to adequately consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding
properties.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Tippin opposed).
The Chairman called a short recess at 10:45 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the
meeting at 10:52 a.m. and all members of the Board of County Commissioners were present.
(CLERK'S NOTE: It was at this point during the meeting that the Chairman called
for Item 9.13.2., those minutes been inserted after 9.13.1.)
11.A.1.
PARD
0
�21il1l u l l "3 ,,r, j ti�!011)h 1110H HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
March 22, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ISI N HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating. AICP
Community Development DFrector
. 7
FROM: Sasan Rohani. AICP x/
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 22, 2001
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)
FUNDS SETASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLIENTS
April 3, 2001
73
•
Chainnan Ginn would base her vote on LDR Section 902.07(3). She agreed PZC did
fail to adequately consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding
properties.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Tippin opposed).
The Chairman called a short recess at 10:45 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the
meeting at 10:52 a.m. and all members of the Board of County Commissioners were present.
(CLERK'S NOTE: It was at this point during the meeting that the Chairman called
for Item 9.13.2., those minutes been inserted after 9.13.1.)
11.A.1.
PARD
0
�21il1l u l l "3 ,,r, j ti�!011)h 1110H HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
March 22, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ISI N HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating. AICP
Community Development DFrector
. 7
FROM: Sasan Rohani. AICP x/
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 22, 2001
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)
FUNDS SETASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLIENTS
April 3, 2001
73
Chainnan Ginn would base her vote on LDR Section 902.07(3). She agreed PZC did
fail to adequately consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding
properties.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Tippin opposed).
The Chairman called a short recess at 10:45 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the
meeting at 10:52 a.m. and all members of the Board of County Commissioners were present.
(CLERK'S NOTE: It was at this point during the meeting that the Chairman called
for Item 9.13.2., those minutes been inserted after 9.13.1.)
11.A.1.
PARD
0
�21il1l u l l "3 ,,r, j ti�!011)h 1110H HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
March 22, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ISI N HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating. AICP
Community Development DFrector
. 7
FROM: Sasan Rohani. AICP x/
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 22, 2001
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)
FUNDS SETASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLIENTS
April 3, 2001
73
•
Chainnan Ginn would base her vote on LDR Section 902.07(3). She agreed PZC did
fail to adequately consider the effects of the proposed development upon surrounding
properties.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Tippin opposed).
The Chairman called a short recess at 10:45 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the
meeting at 10:52 a.m. and all members of the Board of County Commissioners were present.
(CLERK'S NOTE: It was at this point during the meeting that the Chairman called
for Item 9.13.2., those minutes been inserted after 9.13.1.)
11.A.1.
PARD
0
�21il1l u l l "3 ,,r, j ti�!011)h 1110H HABITAT FOR
HUMANITY CLIENTS
Community Development Director Robert M. Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
March 22, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
D ISI N HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keating. AICP
Community Development DFrector
. 7
FROM: Sasan Rohani. AICP x/
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: March 22, 2001
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)
FUNDS SETASIDE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLIENTS
April 3, 2001
73
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3. 2001.
BACKGROUND
The county's Local Housing Assistance Program has been in effect since June of 1993. During that
time, the county has provided 456 loans to individual applicants who applied for assistance.
According to state rules and regulations as well as the county's requirements, SHIP funds may also
be used to supplement or match other state and federal funds.
In the past, the Board of County Commissioners has set aside SHIP funds for certain projects or non-
profit groups. with the requirement that these setaside funds be used consistent with SHIP program
rules and regulations. These setasides consist of the following:
• In 1997, the county used SHIP funds to match CDBG funds in the Wabasso area.
These SHIP funds were provided as impact fee/rehabilitation loans to eligible
applicants within the project area. `
• In September 1999, the Board of County Commissioners agreed to set aside
$150,000 of SHIP funds each year for the next three fiscal years as a HOME program
match for an affordable housing developer. These SHIP funds will be provided as
impact fee loans to eligible applicants who will purchase homes in the developer's
HOME project. At this time, the developer's HOME application is going through the
final approval.
• In 2000, the Board of County Commissioners set aside $200.000 ($100.000 for FY
2001-02 and $100,000 for FY 2002-03) of SHIP funds for the Indian River County
Homeless Task force to be used as a match for a HUD application. These SHIP
funds are to be provided as downpayment/closing cost and/or rehabilitation loans to
eligible applicants who were former homeless persons. Recently, the Board
approved $60.000 of the $200.000 to be used for homeless shelter rehabilitation
consistent with the provisions of the SHIP rental rehabilitation program.
• In 2000. the Board also set aside $200,000 of SHIP funds for Habitat For
Humanity's (HFH's) clients for FY 2000-01. Since inception of the SHIP program,
the county has worked closely with Habitat for Humanity (HFH) and has provided
SHIP funds to a number of HFH clients. HFH constructs owner occupied housing
for the county's very low and low income residents, and SHIP funds are used to
provide downpayment/closing cost. land acquisition and impact fee assistance to
HFH's clients.
As indicated in the attached letter dated February 15, 2001, Habitat For Humanity (HFH) has
informed the county that HFH will increase its production next year. In FY 2001-2002. HFH is
planning to build 12 units. Since county assistance for the HFH homes ranges from $20,000 to
$26.200 per unit, HFH has requested that the county set aside approximately $300.000 of FY 2001-
2002 SHIP funds for HFH's clients.
April 3, 2001
74
iii 762
r
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3. 2001.
BACKGROUND
The county's Local Housing Assistance Program has been in effect since June of 1993. During that
time, the county has provided 456 loans to individual applicants who applied for assistance.
According to state rules and regulations as well as the county's requirements, SHIP funds may also
be used to supplement or match other state and federal funds.
In the past, the Board of County Commissioners has set aside SHIP funds for certain projects or non-
profit groups. with the requirement that these setaside funds be used consistent with SHIP program
rules and regulations. These setasides consist of the following:
• In 1997, the county used SHIP funds to match CDBG funds in the Wabasso area.
These SHIP funds were provided as impact fee/rehabilitation loans to eligible
applicants within the project area. `
• In September 1999, the Board of County Commissioners agreed to set aside
$150,000 of SHIP funds each year for the next three fiscal years as a HOME program
match for an affordable housing developer. These SHIP funds will be provided as
impact fee loans to eligible applicants who will purchase homes in the developer's
HOME project. At this time, the developer's HOME application is going through the
final approval.
• In 2000, the Board of County Commissioners set aside $200.000 ($100.000 for FY
2001-02 and $100,000 for FY 2002-03) of SHIP funds for the Indian River County
Homeless Task force to be used as a match for a HUD application. These SHIP
funds are to be provided as downpayment/closing cost and/or rehabilitation loans to
eligible applicants who were former homeless persons. Recently, the Board
approved $60.000 of the $200.000 to be used for homeless shelter rehabilitation
consistent with the provisions of the SHIP rental rehabilitation program.
• In 2000. the Board also set aside $200,000 of SHIP funds for Habitat For
Humanity's (HFH's) clients for FY 2000-01. Since inception of the SHIP program,
the county has worked closely with Habitat for Humanity (HFH) and has provided
SHIP funds to a number of HFH clients. HFH constructs owner occupied housing
for the county's very low and low income residents, and SHIP funds are used to
provide downpayment/closing cost. land acquisition and impact fee assistance to
HFH's clients.
As indicated in the attached letter dated February 15, 2001, Habitat For Humanity (HFH) has
informed the county that HFH will increase its production next year. In FY 2001-2002. HFH is
planning to build 12 units. Since county assistance for the HFH homes ranges from $20,000 to
$26.200 per unit, HFH has requested that the county set aside approximately $300.000 of FY 2001-
2002 SHIP funds for HFH's clients.
April 3, 2001
74
iii 762
r
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3. 2001.
BACKGROUND
The county's Local Housing Assistance Program has been in effect since June of 1993. During that
time, the county has provided 456 loans to individual applicants who applied for assistance.
According to state rules and regulations as well as the county's requirements, SHIP funds may also
be used to supplement or match other state and federal funds.
In the past, the Board of County Commissioners has set aside SHIP funds for certain projects or non-
profit groups. with the requirement that these setaside funds be used consistent with SHIP program
rules and regulations. These setasides consist of the following:
• In 1997, the county used SHIP funds to match CDBG funds in the Wabasso area.
These SHIP funds were provided as impact fee/rehabilitation loans to eligible
applicants within the project area. `
• In September 1999, the Board of County Commissioners agreed to set aside
$150,000 of SHIP funds each year for the next three fiscal years as a HOME program
match for an affordable housing developer. These SHIP funds will be provided as
impact fee loans to eligible applicants who will purchase homes in the developer's
HOME project. At this time, the developer's HOME application is going through the
final approval.
• In 2000, the Board of County Commissioners set aside $200.000 ($100.000 for FY
2001-02 and $100,000 for FY 2002-03) of SHIP funds for the Indian River County
Homeless Task force to be used as a match for a HUD application. These SHIP
funds are to be provided as downpayment/closing cost and/or rehabilitation loans to
eligible applicants who were former homeless persons. Recently, the Board
approved $60.000 of the $200.000 to be used for homeless shelter rehabilitation
consistent with the provisions of the SHIP rental rehabilitation program.
• In 2000. the Board also set aside $200,000 of SHIP funds for Habitat For
Humanity's (HFH's) clients for FY 2000-01. Since inception of the SHIP program,
the county has worked closely with Habitat for Humanity (HFH) and has provided
SHIP funds to a number of HFH clients. HFH constructs owner occupied housing
for the county's very low and low income residents, and SHIP funds are used to
provide downpayment/closing cost. land acquisition and impact fee assistance to
HFH's clients.
As indicated in the attached letter dated February 15, 2001, Habitat For Humanity (HFH) has
informed the county that HFH will increase its production next year. In FY 2001-2002. HFH is
planning to build 12 units. Since county assistance for the HFH homes ranges from $20,000 to
$26.200 per unit, HFH has requested that the county set aside approximately $300.000 of FY 2001-
2002 SHIP funds for HFH's clients.
April 3, 2001
74
iii 762
r
•
ANALYSIS
One of the goals of the county's local housing assistance plan is to increase home ownership for very
low and low income households. In many cases, an eligible household can afford a mortgage
payment, but cannot save a sufficient amount of money for down payment and closing costs. With
SHIP program funds, eligible households have the opportunity to acquire a housing unit which is
affordable.
Besides its home ownership programs, the Local Housing Assistance Program provides SHIP funds
as loans for rehabilitation of either owner -occupied or renter occupied housing. Households who
occupy these rehabilitation units must be either very low or low income.
While implementing the county's local housing assistance plan, the county must ensure that all state
requirements and local requirements are met. One state requirement is that all funds for a state fiscal
year must be encumbered within 12 months after the end of the fiscal year and must be expended
within 24 months after the end of the fiscal year. Other state requirements are related to the
percentage of the SHIP funds that must be used by various income groups, as well as a minimum
percentage of funds that must be used for home ownership and construction.
HOME program related SHIP applications and HFH SHIP applications are associated with
construction of new units for very low and low income households and meet all of the above criteria.
Since there are many county residents needing housing assistance, the Board must decide how much,
if any. SHIP funds should be set aside for specific programs, and how much to have available for
applicants not associated with setaside programs. Following is a summary of the proposed FY
2001/02 SHIP budget, with the HFH request included.
PROPOSED
FY 2001-02 SHIP BUDGET
• FY 2001-02 State Allocation
• Administration Fees
• Home Program Set Aside
• Homeless Set Aside ($60,000 rental Rehab.
and $40,000 DPCC)
• HFH Requested Set Aside
• Remaining Funds for general SHIP applicants
• TOTAL
April 3, 2001
75
Estimated Proposed
Revenues Expenditures
$937,342
$ 93,734
$150.000
$100.000
$300.000
$293.608
$937342 $937,342
SK 11 7 PG 7 6 3
•
ANALYSIS
One of the goals of the county's local housing assistance plan is to increase home ownership for very
low and low income households. In many cases, an eligible household can afford a mortgage
payment, but cannot save a sufficient amount of money for down payment and closing costs. With
SHIP program funds, eligible households have the opportunity to acquire a housing unit which is
affordable.
Besides its home ownership programs, the Local Housing Assistance Program provides SHIP funds
as loans for rehabilitation of either owner -occupied or renter occupied housing. Households who
occupy these rehabilitation units must be either very low or low income.
While implementing the county's local housing assistance plan, the county must ensure that all state
requirements and local requirements are met. One state requirement is that all funds for a state fiscal
year must be encumbered within 12 months after the end of the fiscal year and must be expended
within 24 months after the end of the fiscal year. Other state requirements are related to the
percentage of the SHIP funds that must be used by various income groups, as well as a minimum
percentage of funds that must be used for home ownership and construction.
HOME program related SHIP applications and HFH SHIP applications are associated with
construction of new units for very low and low income households and meet all of the above criteria.
Since there are many county residents needing housing assistance, the Board must decide how much,
if any. SHIP funds should be set aside for specific programs, and how much to have available for
applicants not associated with setaside programs. Following is a summary of the proposed FY
2001/02 SHIP budget, with the HFH request included.
PROPOSED
FY 2001-02 SHIP BUDGET
• FY 2001-02 State Allocation
• Administration Fees
• Home Program Set Aside
• Homeless Set Aside ($60,000 rental Rehab.
and $40,000 DPCC)
• HFH Requested Set Aside
• Remaining Funds for general SHIP applicants
• TOTAL
April 3, 2001
75
Estimated Proposed
Revenues Expenditures
$937,342
$ 93,734
$150.000
$100.000
$300.000
$293.608
$937342 $937,342
SK 11 7 PG 7 6 3
•
ANALYSIS
One of the goals of the county's local housing assistance plan is to increase home ownership for very
low and low income households. In many cases, an eligible household can afford a mortgage
payment, but cannot save a sufficient amount of money for down payment and closing costs. With
SHIP program funds, eligible households have the opportunity to acquire a housing unit which is
affordable.
Besides its home ownership programs, the Local Housing Assistance Program provides SHIP funds
as loans for rehabilitation of either owner -occupied or renter occupied housing. Households who
occupy these rehabilitation units must be either very low or low income.
While implementing the county's local housing assistance plan, the county must ensure that all state
requirements and local requirements are met. One state requirement is that all funds for a state fiscal
year must be encumbered within 12 months after the end of the fiscal year and must be expended
within 24 months after the end of the fiscal year. Other state requirements are related to the
percentage of the SHIP funds that must be used by various income groups, as well as a minimum
percentage of funds that must be used for home ownership and construction.
HOME program related SHIP applications and HFH SHIP applications are associated with
construction of new units for very low and low income households and meet all of the above criteria.
Since there are many county residents needing housing assistance, the Board must decide how much,
if any. SHIP funds should be set aside for specific programs, and how much to have available for
applicants not associated with setaside programs. Following is a summary of the proposed FY
2001/02 SHIP budget, with the HFH request included.
PROPOSED
FY 2001-02 SHIP BUDGET
• FY 2001-02 State Allocation
• Administration Fees
• Home Program Set Aside
• Homeless Set Aside ($60,000 rental Rehab.
and $40,000 DPCC)
• HFH Requested Set Aside
• Remaining Funds for general SHIP applicants
• TOTAL
April 3, 2001
75
Estimated Proposed
Revenues Expenditures
$937,342
$ 93,734
$150.000
$100.000
$300.000
$293.608
$937342 $937,342
SK 11 7 PG 7 6 3
For those SHIP funds that are set aside, the requirements are the same as those applicable to non.
setaside SHIP funds. Consequently, set aside SHIP funds must be used by the end of the assigned
Fiscal Year, or those funds will be returned to the SHIP trust fund to be used by general SHIP
applicants. As with non-setaside SHIP funds, all setaside funds must be processed according to
SHIP program rules. For each SHIP loan associated with seaside funds, an application must be
filed. the Loan Review Committee must approve the loan, a promissory note and mortgage
document must be prepared, and a closing must be held.
Setting aside SHIP funds for clients of developers and non-profit organizations provides certain
advantages, but has some drawbacks. While setaside funds may leverage money from other
programs, the result is that there is less funding available for general SHIP applicants. Since there
is significant demand for SHIP assistance and since every year there are many applicants who cannot
be assisted due to the lack of funding, setting aside SHIP funds for various groups adversely affects
those county residents who do not have any advocacy group. In FY 2000-2001, for example, there
are approximately 50 SHIP applications that will not even be reviewed, and there are more than 100
applicants who will not be funded.
Despite the fact that setasides reduce the funds available for general applicants, there are advantages
to reserving funds for Habitat For Humanity. One advantage is that HFH has participated in the
SHIP program for a number of years and performed well. Other advantages are that HFH assists
many very low income households, requires that applicants invest sweat equity, provides
homeownership counseling to applicants, and meets all program requirements. For those reasons,
staff supports HFH's request for a $300,000 SHIP setaside for FY 2001/2002.
ALTERNATIVES
The Board of County Conunissioners has two alternatives regarding the proposed SHIP fund set
aside for HFH These alternatives are:
1. Not to set aside any of the SHIP funds for HFH
?. To set aside SHIP funds for HFH applicants
Staff supports alternative number 2, and recommends an FY 2001/2002 funds setaside of $300.000
for Habitat For Humanity to be used for down payment/ closing cost, impact fee, and land
acquisition loan assistance of approximately $25.000 of SHIP funds per unit for HFH's clients.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis performed. staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners set
aside $300.000 of FY 2001/2002 SHIP funds for FY 2001-02 for Habitat For Humanity to be used
for downpayment/closing cost, impact fee, and land acquisition loan assistance of approximately
525.000 of SHIP funds per unit for HFH's clients.
Attachment:
• A copy of the letter dated February 15. 2001 from Indian River Habitat for Humanity
April 3, 2001
76
DK
For those SHIP funds that are set aside, the requirements are the same as those applicable to non.
setaside SHIP funds. Consequently, set aside SHIP funds must be used by the end of the assigned
Fiscal Year, or those funds will be returned to the SHIP trust fund to be used by general SHIP
applicants. As with non-setaside SHIP funds, all setaside funds must be processed according to
SHIP program rules. For each SHIP loan associated with seaside funds, an application must be
filed. the Loan Review Committee must approve the loan, a promissory note and mortgage
document must be prepared, and a closing must be held.
Setting aside SHIP funds for clients of developers and non-profit organizations provides certain
advantages, but has some drawbacks. While setaside funds may leverage money from other
programs, the result is that there is less funding available for general SHIP applicants. Since there
is significant demand for SHIP assistance and since every year there are many applicants who cannot
be assisted due to the lack of funding, setting aside SHIP funds for various groups adversely affects
those county residents who do not have any advocacy group. In FY 2000-2001, for example, there
are approximately 50 SHIP applications that will not even be reviewed, and there are more than 100
applicants who will not be funded.
Despite the fact that setasides reduce the funds available for general applicants, there are advantages
to reserving funds for Habitat For Humanity. One advantage is that HFH has participated in the
SHIP program for a number of years and performed well. Other advantages are that HFH assists
many very low income households, requires that applicants invest sweat equity, provides
homeownership counseling to applicants, and meets all program requirements. For those reasons,
staff supports HFH's request for a $300,000 SHIP setaside for FY 2001/2002.
ALTERNATIVES
The Board of County Conunissioners has two alternatives regarding the proposed SHIP fund set
aside for HFH These alternatives are:
1. Not to set aside any of the SHIP funds for HFH
?. To set aside SHIP funds for HFH applicants
Staff supports alternative number 2, and recommends an FY 2001/2002 funds setaside of $300.000
for Habitat For Humanity to be used for down payment/ closing cost, impact fee, and land
acquisition loan assistance of approximately $25.000 of SHIP funds per unit for HFH's clients.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis performed. staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners set
aside $300.000 of FY 2001/2002 SHIP funds for FY 2001-02 for Habitat For Humanity to be used
for downpayment/closing cost, impact fee, and land acquisition loan assistance of approximately
525.000 of SHIP funds per unit for HFH's clients.
Attachment:
• A copy of the letter dated February 15. 2001 from Indian River Habitat for Humanity
April 3, 2001
76
DK
For those SHIP funds that are set aside, the requirements are the same as those applicable to non.
setaside SHIP funds. Consequently, set aside SHIP funds must be used by the end of the assigned
Fiscal Year, or those funds will be returned to the SHIP trust fund to be used by general SHIP
applicants. As with non-setaside SHIP funds, all setaside funds must be processed according to
SHIP program rules. For each SHIP loan associated with seaside funds, an application must be
filed. the Loan Review Committee must approve the loan, a promissory note and mortgage
document must be prepared, and a closing must be held.
Setting aside SHIP funds for clients of developers and non-profit organizations provides certain
advantages, but has some drawbacks. While setaside funds may leverage money from other
programs, the result is that there is less funding available for general SHIP applicants. Since there
is significant demand for SHIP assistance and since every year there are many applicants who cannot
be assisted due to the lack of funding, setting aside SHIP funds for various groups adversely affects
those county residents who do not have any advocacy group. In FY 2000-2001, for example, there
are approximately 50 SHIP applications that will not even be reviewed, and there are more than 100
applicants who will not be funded.
Despite the fact that setasides reduce the funds available for general applicants, there are advantages
to reserving funds for Habitat For Humanity. One advantage is that HFH has participated in the
SHIP program for a number of years and performed well. Other advantages are that HFH assists
many very low income households, requires that applicants invest sweat equity, provides
homeownership counseling to applicants, and meets all program requirements. For those reasons,
staff supports HFH's request for a $300,000 SHIP setaside for FY 2001/2002.
ALTERNATIVES
The Board of County Conunissioners has two alternatives regarding the proposed SHIP fund set
aside for HFH These alternatives are:
1. Not to set aside any of the SHIP funds for HFH
?. To set aside SHIP funds for HFH applicants
Staff supports alternative number 2, and recommends an FY 2001/2002 funds setaside of $300.000
for Habitat For Humanity to be used for down payment/ closing cost, impact fee, and land
acquisition loan assistance of approximately $25.000 of SHIP funds per unit for HFH's clients.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis performed. staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners set
aside $300.000 of FY 2001/2002 SHIP funds for FY 2001-02 for Habitat For Humanity to be used
for downpayment/closing cost, impact fee, and land acquisition loan assistance of approximately
525.000 of SHIP funds per unit for HFH's clients.
Attachment:
• A copy of the letter dated February 15. 2001 from Indian River Habitat for Humanity
April 3, 2001
76
DK
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved a set
aside in the amount of $300,000 of FY 2001/02 SHIP funds for
FY 2001/02 for Habitat for Humanity to be used for down
payment/closing costs, impact fee, and land acquisition loan
assistance of approximately $25,000 of SHIP funds per unit for
HFH's clients, as recommended in the memorandum.
f fie tsoara reviewed a Memorandum of March 27, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
RV6ert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois. AICP
Chief. Environmental Planning
DATE: March 27, 2001
SUBJECT: Request for Board Approval of Second Amendment to Option Agreement for State Cost.
ShareReimbursement: Fischer -Sebastian River Conservation Area
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
April 3, 2001
77
7 ,JG 7 6
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved a set
aside in the amount of $300,000 of FY 2001/02 SHIP funds for
FY 2001/02 for Habitat for Humanity to be used for down
payment/closing costs, impact fee, and land acquisition loan
assistance of approximately $25,000 of SHIP funds per unit for
HFH's clients, as recommended in the memorandum.
f fie tsoara reviewed a Memorandum of March 27, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
RV6ert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois. AICP
Chief. Environmental Planning
DATE: March 27, 2001
SUBJECT: Request for Board Approval of Second Amendment to Option Agreement for State Cost.
ShareReimbursement: Fischer -Sebastian River Conservation Area
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
April 3, 2001
77
7 ,JG 7 6
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved a set
aside in the amount of $300,000 of FY 2001/02 SHIP funds for
FY 2001/02 for Habitat for Humanity to be used for down
payment/closing costs, impact fee, and land acquisition loan
assistance of approximately $25,000 of SHIP funds per unit for
HFH's clients, as recommended in the memorandum.
f fie tsoara reviewed a Memorandum of March 27, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
RV6ert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois. AICP
Chief. Environmental Planning
DATE: March 27, 2001
SUBJECT: Request for Board Approval of Second Amendment to Option Agreement for State Cost.
ShareReimbursement: Fischer -Sebastian River Conservation Area
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 3, 2001.
April 3, 2001
77
7 ,JG 7 6
DESCRIF i1UN AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners, at a public hearing on March 19, 1996, approved county purchase of the —95
acre "Fischer - Sebastian River" property using environmental land bond funds. The property is located on the east
and west shorelines of the south prong of the St. Sebastian River, north of C.R. 512 (see attached map). The County
closed the purchase in January 1997, under the premise that it will proceed to obtain cost -share reimbursement
under the State Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program. On August 22, 2000, the Board approved an
Option Agreement for County sale of the Fischer -St. Sebastian River property to the Board of Trustees of the
Internal Improvement Trust Fund (BTIITF) at a price of $605,000, and authorized staff to take steps as necessary to
facilitate the sale closing.
The subject Option Agreement is to be considered by the Governor and Cabinet on April 10, 2001. At that time the
Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the BTIITF, will vote whether or not to exercise the Option.
County staff was recently informed by state staff that there is a valuation issue caused by a non-exclusive
management easement that the County obtained when it bought the Fischer property (see attached letter). The result
is that the State's approved appraised value of the Fischer property has been reduced from $1,210,000 to 5952.480,
thus reducing the 50% cost -share reimbursement from $605,000 to $476,240. To that end, Division of State Lands
(DSL) staff is requesting that the Board approve the attached Second Amendment to the Option Agreement to
account for the reduction.
ANALYSIS
When the County purchased the property in 1997 from Dr. Henry Fischer, negotiations included the acquisition of a
non-exclusive access easement to a portion of the parcel (see attachment). The easement was to allow access to —24
acres of the overall —95 acres and runs through a portion of a partially developed private subdivision (Fischer Lake
Island). At that time, Dr. Fischer was concerned about public access through the private subdivision and insisted
that the non-exclusive easement be limited to use for management purposes only. The County accepted this type of
easement, as the property is adjacent to state-owned lands and there would not be a problem providing access to the
property. In fact, St. Sebastian River Buffer Preserve staff has indicated that the limited access easement does not
present a problem in managing the property.
adverse effect on market value of the property and tIt was not contemplated at the time the County bought the property that acceptance of the easement could have an
hus affect State cost -share reimbursement. State staff, in
consulting the appraisers that evaluated the property for the County, has concluded that the easement affects the
market value negatively and restricts the use of the property served by the easement much like a conservation
easement would.
The County has essentially two alternatives. The first alternative is for the County not to amend the Option
Agreement, which will likely result in the Governor and Cabinet voting to not exercise the current Option. In tum,
the County will retain ownership of the property, including responsibility for on-going management, and not receive
any cost -share reimbursement. The second alternative is for the County to approve the amendment, sell the property
to the State, and receive the reduced (but still substantial) reimbursement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Second Amendment to Option
Agreement and authorize the Board Chairman to execute the document. Moreover, staff recommends that the
Board authorize county staff to take actions as necessary to finalize closing of the purchase under the revised
Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS:
I Map of the Fischer property
2. Depiction of non-exclusive easement
Letter dated 3123101 from DSL staff
4 Second Amendment to the Option Agreement
April 3, 2001
0
NOfn aK G I AOGl Avco
Aamlrt d ,
Leaw
Buaget I
Lec q
AfSk ,y gr
3%
C)ale
Q
DESCRIF i1UN AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners, at a public hearing on March 19, 1996, approved county purchase of the —95
acre "Fischer - Sebastian River" property using environmental land bond funds. The property is located on the east
and west shorelines of the south prong of the St. Sebastian River, north of C.R. 512 (see attached map). The County
closed the purchase in January 1997, under the premise that it will proceed to obtain cost -share reimbursement
under the State Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program. On August 22, 2000, the Board approved an
Option Agreement for County sale of the Fischer -St. Sebastian River property to the Board of Trustees of the
Internal Improvement Trust Fund (BTIITF) at a price of $605,000, and authorized staff to take steps as necessary to
facilitate the sale closing.
The subject Option Agreement is to be considered by the Governor and Cabinet on April 10, 2001. At that time the
Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the BTIITF, will vote whether or not to exercise the Option.
County staff was recently informed by state staff that there is a valuation issue caused by a non-exclusive
management easement that the County obtained when it bought the Fischer property (see attached letter). The result
is that the State's approved appraised value of the Fischer property has been reduced from $1,210,000 to 5952.480,
thus reducing the 50% cost -share reimbursement from $605,000 to $476,240. To that end, Division of State Lands
(DSL) staff is requesting that the Board approve the attached Second Amendment to the Option Agreement to
account for the reduction.
ANALYSIS
When the County purchased the property in 1997 from Dr. Henry Fischer, negotiations included the acquisition of a
non-exclusive access easement to a portion of the parcel (see attachment). The easement was to allow access to —24
acres of the overall —95 acres and runs through a portion of a partially developed private subdivision (Fischer Lake
Island). At that time, Dr. Fischer was concerned about public access through the private subdivision and insisted
that the non-exclusive easement be limited to use for management purposes only. The County accepted this type of
easement, as the property is adjacent to state-owned lands and there would not be a problem providing access to the
property. In fact, St. Sebastian River Buffer Preserve staff has indicated that the limited access easement does not
present a problem in managing the property.
adverse effect on market value of the property and tIt was not contemplated at the time the County bought the property that acceptance of the easement could have an
hus affect State cost -share reimbursement. State staff, in
consulting the appraisers that evaluated the property for the County, has concluded that the easement affects the
market value negatively and restricts the use of the property served by the easement much like a conservation
easement would.
The County has essentially two alternatives. The first alternative is for the County not to amend the Option
Agreement, which will likely result in the Governor and Cabinet voting to not exercise the current Option. In tum,
the County will retain ownership of the property, including responsibility for on-going management, and not receive
any cost -share reimbursement. The second alternative is for the County to approve the amendment, sell the property
to the State, and receive the reduced (but still substantial) reimbursement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Second Amendment to Option
Agreement and authorize the Board Chairman to execute the document. Moreover, staff recommends that the
Board authorize county staff to take actions as necessary to finalize closing of the purchase under the revised
Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS:
I Map of the Fischer property
2. Depiction of non-exclusive easement
Letter dated 3123101 from DSL staff
4 Second Amendment to the Option Agreement
April 3, 2001
0
NOfn aK G I AOGl Avco
Aamlrt d ,
Leaw
Buaget I
Lec q
AfSk ,y gr
3%
C)ale
Q
DESCRIF i1UN AND CONDITIONS
The Board of County Commissioners, at a public hearing on March 19, 1996, approved county purchase of the —95
acre "Fischer - Sebastian River" property using environmental land bond funds. The property is located on the east
and west shorelines of the south prong of the St. Sebastian River, north of C.R. 512 (see attached map). The County
closed the purchase in January 1997, under the premise that it will proceed to obtain cost -share reimbursement
under the State Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program. On August 22, 2000, the Board approved an
Option Agreement for County sale of the Fischer -St. Sebastian River property to the Board of Trustees of the
Internal Improvement Trust Fund (BTIITF) at a price of $605,000, and authorized staff to take steps as necessary to
facilitate the sale closing.
The subject Option Agreement is to be considered by the Governor and Cabinet on April 10, 2001. At that time the
Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the BTIITF, will vote whether or not to exercise the Option.
County staff was recently informed by state staff that there is a valuation issue caused by a non-exclusive
management easement that the County obtained when it bought the Fischer property (see attached letter). The result
is that the State's approved appraised value of the Fischer property has been reduced from $1,210,000 to 5952.480,
thus reducing the 50% cost -share reimbursement from $605,000 to $476,240. To that end, Division of State Lands
(DSL) staff is requesting that the Board approve the attached Second Amendment to the Option Agreement to
account for the reduction.
ANALYSIS
When the County purchased the property in 1997 from Dr. Henry Fischer, negotiations included the acquisition of a
non-exclusive access easement to a portion of the parcel (see attachment). The easement was to allow access to —24
acres of the overall —95 acres and runs through a portion of a partially developed private subdivision (Fischer Lake
Island). At that time, Dr. Fischer was concerned about public access through the private subdivision and insisted
that the non-exclusive easement be limited to use for management purposes only. The County accepted this type of
easement, as the property is adjacent to state-owned lands and there would not be a problem providing access to the
property. In fact, St. Sebastian River Buffer Preserve staff has indicated that the limited access easement does not
present a problem in managing the property.
adverse effect on market value of the property and tIt was not contemplated at the time the County bought the property that acceptance of the easement could have an
hus affect State cost -share reimbursement. State staff, in
consulting the appraisers that evaluated the property for the County, has concluded that the easement affects the
market value negatively and restricts the use of the property served by the easement much like a conservation
easement would.
The County has essentially two alternatives. The first alternative is for the County not to amend the Option
Agreement, which will likely result in the Governor and Cabinet voting to not exercise the current Option. In tum,
the County will retain ownership of the property, including responsibility for on-going management, and not receive
any cost -share reimbursement. The second alternative is for the County to approve the amendment, sell the property
to the State, and receive the reduced (but still substantial) reimbursement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Second Amendment to Option
Agreement and authorize the Board Chairman to execute the document. Moreover, staff recommends that the
Board authorize county staff to take actions as necessary to finalize closing of the purchase under the revised
Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS:
I Map of the Fischer property
2. Depiction of non-exclusive easement
Letter dated 3123101 from DSL staff
4 Second Amendment to the Option Agreement
April 3, 2001
0
NOfn aK G I AOGl Avco
Aamlrt d ,
Leaw
Buaget I
Lec q
AfSk ,y gr
3%
C)ale
Q
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Second Amendment to Option Agreement, authorized
the Chairman to execute the document, and authorized staff to
take actions as necessary to finalize closing of the purchase
under the revised agreement, as recommended in the
memorandum.
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED SECOND AMENDMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
ME. 200L2002 BUDGET WORKSHOPME2
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 20, 2001:
April 3, 2001
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: March 20, 2001
SUBJECT: 2001/2002 BUDGET WORKSHOWHEARING SCHEDULE
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird ic.
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
L,
Listed below for the approval of the Board of County Commissioners are the proposed
2001/2002 budget workshop and hearing dates. Staff is requesting approval of a proposed
calendar so that we can plan a budget schedule in advance and notify the Constitutional Officers,
state agencies, non-profit agencies and other interested parties.
July 6, 2001 Board of County Commissioners to receive
Friday "Budget Pack".
July 11-12, 2001
Wednesday -Thursday SCHEDULED BUDGET WORKSHOPS
September 5, 2001 Public Hearing on TENTATIVE budget and
Wednesday proposed millage rate at 5:01 p.m.
September 12, 2001
Wednesday FINAL budget hearing at 5:01 p.m.
79
61( JG 167
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Second Amendment to Option Agreement, authorized
the Chairman to execute the document, and authorized staff to
take actions as necessary to finalize closing of the purchase
under the revised agreement, as recommended in the
memorandum.
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED SECOND AMENDMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
ME. 200L2002 BUDGET WORKSHOPME2
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 20, 2001:
April 3, 2001
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: March 20, 2001
SUBJECT: 2001/2002 BUDGET WORKSHOWHEARING SCHEDULE
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird ic.
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
L,
Listed below for the approval of the Board of County Commissioners are the proposed
2001/2002 budget workshop and hearing dates. Staff is requesting approval of a proposed
calendar so that we can plan a budget schedule in advance and notify the Constitutional Officers,
state agencies, non-profit agencies and other interested parties.
July 6, 2001 Board of County Commissioners to receive
Friday "Budget Pack".
July 11-12, 2001
Wednesday -Thursday SCHEDULED BUDGET WORKSHOPS
September 5, 2001 Public Hearing on TENTATIVE budget and
Wednesday proposed millage rate at 5:01 p.m.
September 12, 2001
Wednesday FINAL budget hearing at 5:01 p.m.
79
61( JG 167
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Second Amendment to Option Agreement, authorized
the Chairman to execute the document, and authorized staff to
take actions as necessary to finalize closing of the purchase
under the revised agreement, as recommended in the
memorandum.
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED SECOND AMENDMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
ME. 200L2002 BUDGET WORKSHOPME2
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 20, 2001:
April 3, 2001
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: March 20, 2001
SUBJECT: 2001/2002 BUDGET WORKSHOWHEARING SCHEDULE
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird ic.
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
L,
Listed below for the approval of the Board of County Commissioners are the proposed
2001/2002 budget workshop and hearing dates. Staff is requesting approval of a proposed
calendar so that we can plan a budget schedule in advance and notify the Constitutional Officers,
state agencies, non-profit agencies and other interested parties.
July 6, 2001 Board of County Commissioners to receive
Friday "Budget Pack".
July 11-12, 2001
Wednesday -Thursday SCHEDULED BUDGET WORKSHOPS
September 5, 2001 Public Hearing on TENTATIVE budget and
Wednesday proposed millage rate at 5:01 p.m.
September 12, 2001
Wednesday FINAL budget hearing at 5:01 p.m.
79
61( JG 167
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
suggested dates and times as recommended by staff in the above
memorandum.
Commissioner Macht hoped the Board could stick to these dates.
11.G. VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER I
- BRIDGES AND CULVERTS AT 77TH STREET AT
AVENUES AND 89TH STREET AT 96TH COURT
ON PROPERTY OF EDMUND ANSIN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 23, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director :?u'
i
SUBJECT: Vero Lake Estates Stormwater Improvements
REF. MEMO: Ron Callahan to Jim Davis dated March 19, 2001
DATE: March 23, 2001
The County has received $735,000 in grant funds from the State and
Federal governments to construct stormwater improvements in Vero
Lake Estates Subdivision. To perform the project, Mr. Edmund Ansin
has agreed to donate fee simple title to several parcels of land
and grant easements through others under his ownership. Also, Mr.
Ansin has several large parcels of land south and north of the
subdivision, which he has offered to make available to stockpile
large quantities of fill dirt being excavated from the project.
This fill may be used at the North County Park site and other sites
in the future. To access Mr. Ansin's land from the subdivision,
three bridge/culvert structures over the 77`h Street and 89`° Street
canals are needed at the following locations:
April 3, 2001
v t ebb
BK r `u
80
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
suggested dates and times as recommended by staff in the above
memorandum.
Commissioner Macht hoped the Board could stick to these dates.
11.G. VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER I
- BRIDGES AND CULVERTS AT 77TH STREET AT
AVENUES AND 89TH STREET AT 96TH COURT
ON PROPERTY OF EDMUND ANSIN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 23, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director :?u'
i
SUBJECT: Vero Lake Estates Stormwater Improvements
REF. MEMO: Ron Callahan to Jim Davis dated March 19, 2001
DATE: March 23, 2001
The County has received $735,000 in grant funds from the State and
Federal governments to construct stormwater improvements in Vero
Lake Estates Subdivision. To perform the project, Mr. Edmund Ansin
has agreed to donate fee simple title to several parcels of land
and grant easements through others under his ownership. Also, Mr.
Ansin has several large parcels of land south and north of the
subdivision, which he has offered to make available to stockpile
large quantities of fill dirt being excavated from the project.
This fill may be used at the North County Park site and other sites
in the future. To access Mr. Ansin's land from the subdivision,
three bridge/culvert structures over the 77`h Street and 89`° Street
canals are needed at the following locations:
April 3, 2001
v t ebb
BK r `u
80
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
suggested dates and times as recommended by staff in the above
memorandum.
Commissioner Macht hoped the Board could stick to these dates.
11.G. VERO LAKE ESTATES STORMWATER I
- BRIDGES AND CULVERTS AT 77TH STREET AT
AVENUES AND 89TH STREET AT 96TH COURT
ON PROPERTY OF EDMUND ANSIN
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 23, 2001:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director :?u'
i
SUBJECT: Vero Lake Estates Stormwater Improvements
REF. MEMO: Ron Callahan to Jim Davis dated March 19, 2001
DATE: March 23, 2001
The County has received $735,000 in grant funds from the State and
Federal governments to construct stormwater improvements in Vero
Lake Estates Subdivision. To perform the project, Mr. Edmund Ansin
has agreed to donate fee simple title to several parcels of land
and grant easements through others under his ownership. Also, Mr.
Ansin has several large parcels of land south and north of the
subdivision, which he has offered to make available to stockpile
large quantities of fill dirt being excavated from the project.
This fill may be used at the North County Park site and other sites
in the future. To access Mr. Ansin's land from the subdivision,
three bridge/culvert structures over the 77`h Street and 89`° Street
canals are needed at the following locations:
April 3, 2001
v t ebb
BK r `u
80
The cost of these structures are estimated to cost $50,000.
The availability of Mr. Ansin's land to stockpile
projected to save the county as much as material is
$1/cy ® 200,000 c.y, of
material or $200,000.
Staff recommends that the County Road and Bridge Division purchase
and install bridge/culvert structures at the above three locations.
Funding to be from Road and Bridge Division Fund 111-214 since the
material will be used on county projects.
March 19, 2001 memo from Ron Callahan to Jim Davis
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
purchase and installation of bridge/culvert structures at 77`n
Street at 90" Avenue, 77' Street at 102" Avenue, and 89`' Street
at 96`h Court, with funding from Road and Bridge Division Fund
111-214, as recommended in the memorandum.
i ne hoard reviewed a Memorandum of March 1, 2001:
April 3, 2001
N
eIt
lk t ru 16 9
The cost of these structures are estimated to cost $50,000.
The availability of Mr. Ansin's land to stockpile
projected to save the county as much as material is
$1/cy ® 200,000 c.y, of
material or $200,000.
Staff recommends that the County Road and Bridge Division purchase
and install bridge/culvert structures at the above three locations.
Funding to be from Road and Bridge Division Fund 111-214 since the
material will be used on county projects.
March 19, 2001 memo from Ron Callahan to Jim Davis
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
purchase and installation of bridge/culvert structures at 77`n
Street at 90" Avenue, 77' Street at 102" Avenue, and 89`' Street
at 96`h Court, with funding from Road and Bridge Division Fund
111-214, as recommended in the memorandum.
i ne hoard reviewed a Memorandum of March 1, 2001:
April 3, 2001
N
eIt
lk t ru 16 9
The cost of these structures are estimated to cost $50,000.
The availability of Mr. Ansin's land to stockpile
projected to save the county as much as material is
$1/cy ® 200,000 c.y, of
material or $200,000.
Staff recommends that the County Road and Bridge Division purchase
and install bridge/culvert structures at the above three locations.
Funding to be from Road and Bridge Division Fund 111-214 since the
material will be used on county projects.
March 19, 2001 memo from Ron Callahan to Jim Davis
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
purchase and installation of bridge/culvert structures at 77`n
Street at 90" Avenue, 77' Street at 102" Avenue, and 89`' Street
at 96`h Court, with funding from Road and Bridge Division Fund
111-214, as recommended in the memorandum.
i ne hoard reviewed a Memorandum of March 1, 2001:
April 3, 2001
N
eIt
lk t ru 16 9
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMIINISTRATOR
THROUGH
-�I
DONALD R HUBBS, P.E. 3/"
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
FROM: GENE RAUTH . Ap�
OPERATIONS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE
BACKGROUND
On January 9, 2001, the Board of County Commissioner's approved the overall
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA) plan for the Water
Production and Distribution System. This system will be a single comprehensive,
Countywide water production SCADA System to serve the County's Water Production
and Distribution Division. As part of this Agenda Item, the Board of County
Commissioner's approved Staff to proceed with Phase I of the plan, which dealt with the
North County Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant (see attached Agenda Item and
Minutes).
ANALYSIS
Phase I of the project contained three elements:
I. Work Authorization No. 1 from ROCHA Controls, Inc., in the amount of
$18,084.00.
2. Miscellaneous computer hardware and periphery upgrades as determined by
Computer Services Department (estimated cost $25,000).
3. 10% contingency.
Total estimated cost (rounded) $47,500.00
Work Authorization No. 1 from ROCHA Controls, Inc. has been completed and accepted
by staff. Staff is currently proceeding with the in-house miscellaneous computer
hardware and periphery upgrades at the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant site. Staff
is prepared to proceed with Phase II of the project, as outlined in the attached January 9,
2001, Agenda Item.
The estimated cost for Phase II is $111,700 The overall SCADA plan/budget as
outlined for the project and approved by the Board, has not changed.
RECOMMENDATION
The Staff of both the Department of Utility Services and the Computer Services
Department recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve proceeding
with Phase II of the project in the authorized amount of $111,700k.00. It is further
April 3, 2001
82
t
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMIINISTRATOR
THROUGH
-�I
DONALD R HUBBS, P.E. 3/"
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
FROM: GENE RAUTH . Ap�
OPERATIONS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE
BACKGROUND
On January 9, 2001, the Board of County Commissioner's approved the overall
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA) plan for the Water
Production and Distribution System. This system will be a single comprehensive,
Countywide water production SCADA System to serve the County's Water Production
and Distribution Division. As part of this Agenda Item, the Board of County
Commissioner's approved Staff to proceed with Phase I of the plan, which dealt with the
North County Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant (see attached Agenda Item and
Minutes).
ANALYSIS
Phase I of the project contained three elements:
I. Work Authorization No. 1 from ROCHA Controls, Inc., in the amount of
$18,084.00.
2. Miscellaneous computer hardware and periphery upgrades as determined by
Computer Services Department (estimated cost $25,000).
3. 10% contingency.
Total estimated cost (rounded) $47,500.00
Work Authorization No. 1 from ROCHA Controls, Inc. has been completed and accepted
by staff. Staff is currently proceeding with the in-house miscellaneous computer
hardware and periphery upgrades at the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant site. Staff
is prepared to proceed with Phase II of the project, as outlined in the attached January 9,
2001, Agenda Item.
The estimated cost for Phase II is $111,700 The overall SCADA plan/budget as
outlined for the project and approved by the Board, has not changed.
RECOMMENDATION
The Staff of both the Department of Utility Services and the Computer Services
Department recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve proceeding
with Phase II of the project in the authorized amount of $111,700k.00. It is further
April 3, 2001
82
t
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMIINISTRATOR
THROUGH
-�I
DONALD R HUBBS, P.E. 3/"
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
FROM: GENE RAUTH . Ap�
OPERATIONS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WATER PRODUCTION PUMPING SYSTEM UPGRADE
BACKGROUND
On January 9, 2001, the Board of County Commissioner's approved the overall
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA) plan for the Water
Production and Distribution System. This system will be a single comprehensive,
Countywide water production SCADA System to serve the County's Water Production
and Distribution Division. As part of this Agenda Item, the Board of County
Commissioner's approved Staff to proceed with Phase I of the plan, which dealt with the
North County Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant (see attached Agenda Item and
Minutes).
ANALYSIS
Phase I of the project contained three elements:
I. Work Authorization No. 1 from ROCHA Controls, Inc., in the amount of
$18,084.00.
2. Miscellaneous computer hardware and periphery upgrades as determined by
Computer Services Department (estimated cost $25,000).
3. 10% contingency.
Total estimated cost (rounded) $47,500.00
Work Authorization No. 1 from ROCHA Controls, Inc. has been completed and accepted
by staff. Staff is currently proceeding with the in-house miscellaneous computer
hardware and periphery upgrades at the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant site. Staff
is prepared to proceed with Phase II of the project, as outlined in the attached January 9,
2001, Agenda Item.
The estimated cost for Phase II is $111,700 The overall SCADA plan/budget as
outlined for the project and approved by the Board, has not changed.
RECOMMENDATION
The Staff of both the Department of Utility Services and the Computer Services
Department recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve proceeding
with Phase II of the project in the authorized amount of $111,700k.00. It is further
April 3, 2001
82
t
requested that the Board of County Commissioners accept/approve Work Authorization
N0. 2 from ROCHA Controls, Inc., in the amount of $76,540.00 and allow the Chair to
execute same.
FUNDING SOUR E
The funding for the total project will come from the Renewal & Replacement (R&R)
Funds No. 471 and Capacity Charge Fund No. 472. The total estimated R&R budget
(Fund No. 471) equals $107,992, and the total estimated Capacity Charge budget (Fund
No. 472) equals $99,708
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
I . January 9, 2001 Agenda Item and Minutes.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
proceeding with Phase II of the project in the amount of
$111,700.00, accepted and approved Work Authorization No.
2 from Benro Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, (ROCHA
Controls) in the amount of $76,540, and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended
memorandum.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
URI REP AUTHORIZATI
in the
McKEE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 16, 2001:
April 3, 2001
nit PG 7 71
requested that the Board of County Commissioners accept/approve Work Authorization
N0. 2 from ROCHA Controls, Inc., in the amount of $76,540.00 and allow the Chair to
execute same.
FUNDING SOUR E
The funding for the total project will come from the Renewal & Replacement (R&R)
Funds No. 471 and Capacity Charge Fund No. 472. The total estimated R&R budget
(Fund No. 471) equals $107,992, and the total estimated Capacity Charge budget (Fund
No. 472) equals $99,708
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
I . January 9, 2001 Agenda Item and Minutes.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
proceeding with Phase II of the project in the amount of
$111,700.00, accepted and approved Work Authorization No.
2 from Benro Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, (ROCHA
Controls) in the amount of $76,540, and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended
memorandum.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
URI REP AUTHORIZATI
in the
McKEE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 16, 2001:
April 3, 2001
nit PG 7 71
requested that the Board of County Commissioners accept/approve Work Authorization
N0. 2 from ROCHA Controls, Inc., in the amount of $76,540.00 and allow the Chair to
execute same.
FUNDING SOUR E
The funding for the total project will come from the Renewal & Replacement (R&R)
Funds No. 471 and Capacity Charge Fund No. 472. The total estimated R&R budget
(Fund No. 471) equals $107,992, and the total estimated Capacity Charge budget (Fund
No. 472) equals $99,708
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
I . January 9, 2001 Agenda Item and Minutes.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
proceeding with Phase II of the project in the amount of
$111,700.00, accepted and approved Work Authorization No.
2 from Benro Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, (ROCHA
Controls) in the amount of $76,540, and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended
memorandum.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
URI REP AUTHORIZATI
in the
McKEE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 16, 2001:
April 3, 2001
nit PG 7 71
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
MARCH 16, 2001 -
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1 I
DONALD R, HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED AND GENE A. RAUTH G1}%
STAFFED BY: OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER
TREATMENT PLANT MEMBRANE REPLACEMENT
The Indian River County South Reverse Osmosis RO Water
t has een
producing potable water since July, 1983. Initially the plant capacity wras 2.0 millmentliion gallons per
day (MGD). The plant has undergone three expansions since the initial construction. The
current permitted capacity of the plant is 8.57 MGD. Camp Dresser R. McKee (CDM) was
authorized, on December 71 1999 under Work Authorization No. 10
services to evaluate membrane process optimi, to perform engineering
zation on all four skids at the South County RO
Water Treatment Plants. The membranes at the South County RO Plant have decreased in
Performance since installation.
ANALYSIS
Reverse Osmosis Membranes are sensiti
Pressure drop across the membranes ve to fouling. Fouling of the membranes increase the
while also decreasing the water production capability.
Based upon CDM's Engineering Report (report on file), al
pressure drop ranging from l four skids show an increase in
approximatel 12.5% to 25%.
hresulted in a
loss in water production and significantly increased power c stssfor the plant.. The pr jec ed corresponding
cost
Of the membrane replacement project is estimated to be nearly one million dollars. A present
value analysis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a membrane replacement has been performed
as part of Work Authorization No. 10 (report on file). The present value of the membrane
replacement savings through increased production is $882,000. The Utilities investment for
replacement of the membranes would be $819,500. The realized savings over the ten year life
cycle of the new membrane would be $62,500 ($882,000 - $819,
not include engineering and administration 500 = $62,500). These costs do
RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff of the Department of Utility Services is requesting approval from the Board of County
Commissioners to proceed with the formal RFP process for replacement of the membranes at the
South County RO Plant.
April 3, 2001
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
MARCH 16, 2001 -
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1 I
DONALD R, HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED AND GENE A. RAUTH G1}%
STAFFED BY: OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER
TREATMENT PLANT MEMBRANE REPLACEMENT
The Indian River County South Reverse Osmosis RO Water
t has een
producing potable water since July, 1983. Initially the plant capacity wras 2.0 millmentliion gallons per
day (MGD). The plant has undergone three expansions since the initial construction. The
current permitted capacity of the plant is 8.57 MGD. Camp Dresser R. McKee (CDM) was
authorized, on December 71 1999 under Work Authorization No. 10
services to evaluate membrane process optimi, to perform engineering
zation on all four skids at the South County RO
Water Treatment Plants. The membranes at the South County RO Plant have decreased in
Performance since installation.
ANALYSIS
Reverse Osmosis Membranes are sensiti
Pressure drop across the membranes ve to fouling. Fouling of the membranes increase the
while also decreasing the water production capability.
Based upon CDM's Engineering Report (report on file), al
pressure drop ranging from l four skids show an increase in
approximatel 12.5% to 25%.
hresulted in a
loss in water production and significantly increased power c stssfor the plant.. The pr jec ed corresponding
cost
Of the membrane replacement project is estimated to be nearly one million dollars. A present
value analysis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a membrane replacement has been performed
as part of Work Authorization No. 10 (report on file). The present value of the membrane
replacement savings through increased production is $882,000. The Utilities investment for
replacement of the membranes would be $819,500. The realized savings over the ten year life
cycle of the new membrane would be $62,500 ($882,000 - $819,
not include engineering and administration 500 = $62,500). These costs do
RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff of the Department of Utility Services is requesting approval from the Board of County
Commissioners to proceed with the formal RFP process for replacement of the membranes at the
South County RO Plant.
April 3, 2001
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
MARCH 16, 2001 -
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1 I
DONALD R, HUBBS, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED AND GENE A. RAUTH G1}%
STAFFED BY: OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER
TREATMENT PLANT MEMBRANE REPLACEMENT
The Indian River County South Reverse Osmosis RO Water
t has een
producing potable water since July, 1983. Initially the plant capacity wras 2.0 millmentliion gallons per
day (MGD). The plant has undergone three expansions since the initial construction. The
current permitted capacity of the plant is 8.57 MGD. Camp Dresser R. McKee (CDM) was
authorized, on December 71 1999 under Work Authorization No. 10
services to evaluate membrane process optimi, to perform engineering
zation on all four skids at the South County RO
Water Treatment Plants. The membranes at the South County RO Plant have decreased in
Performance since installation.
ANALYSIS
Reverse Osmosis Membranes are sensiti
Pressure drop across the membranes ve to fouling. Fouling of the membranes increase the
while also decreasing the water production capability.
Based upon CDM's Engineering Report (report on file), al
pressure drop ranging from l four skids show an increase in
approximatel 12.5% to 25%.
hresulted in a
loss in water production and significantly increased power c stssfor the plant.. The pr jec ed corresponding
cost
Of the membrane replacement project is estimated to be nearly one million dollars. A present
value analysis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a membrane replacement has been performed
as part of Work Authorization No. 10 (report on file). The present value of the membrane
replacement savings through increased production is $882,000. The Utilities investment for
replacement of the membranes would be $819,500. The realized savings over the ten year life
cycle of the new membrane would be $62,500 ($882,000 - $819,
not include engineering and administration 500 = $62,500). These costs do
RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff of the Department of Utility Services is requesting approval from the Board of County
Commissioners to proceed with the formal RFP process for replacement of the membranes at the
South County RO Plant.
April 3, 2001
FUNDING SOURCE
The funding for the project will be from 471-000-169-377.00, Renewal & Replacement (R&R).
LIST OF EXHIBITS•
1. CDM report – Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Membrane Analysis Report —
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized staff
to proceed with formal RFP (request for proposal) process for
replacement of the membranes at the South County RO Plant, as
recommended in the memorandum.
REPORT OF CAMP DRESSER & McKEE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.Hel RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-037 AND 2001-038 — EXTENSION
OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US#1 — CITY OF
SEBASTIAN — RESOLUTIONS I AND II — PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT
Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of March 16,
201:
DATE: MARCH 16, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P. E
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS
AND STAFFED MANAGER OFA MENT PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF
U. S. HIGHWAY ONE – CITY OF SEBASTIAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. U W -0049 -DS
RESOLUTIONS I & II – PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
April 3, 2001
M
FUNDING SOURCE
The funding for the project will be from 471-000-169-377.00, Renewal & Replacement (R&R).
LIST OF EXHIBITS•
1. CDM report – Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Membrane Analysis Report —
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized staff
to proceed with formal RFP (request for proposal) process for
replacement of the membranes at the South County RO Plant, as
recommended in the memorandum.
REPORT OF CAMP DRESSER & McKEE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.Hel RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-037 AND 2001-038 — EXTENSION
OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US#1 — CITY OF
SEBASTIAN — RESOLUTIONS I AND II — PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT
Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of March 16,
201:
DATE: MARCH 16, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P. E
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS
AND STAFFED MANAGER OFA MENT PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF
U. S. HIGHWAY ONE – CITY OF SEBASTIAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. U W -0049 -DS
RESOLUTIONS I & II – PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
April 3, 2001
M
FUNDING SOURCE
The funding for the project will be from 471-000-169-377.00, Renewal & Replacement (R&R).
LIST OF EXHIBITS•
1. CDM report – Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant Membrane Analysis Report —
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized staff
to proceed with formal RFP (request for proposal) process for
replacement of the membranes at the South County RO Plant, as
recommended in the memorandum.
REPORT OF CAMP DRESSER & McKEE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.Hel RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-037 AND 2001-038 — EXTENSION
OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF US#1 — CITY OF
SEBASTIAN — RESOLUTIONS I AND II — PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT
Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs reviewed a Memorandum of March 16,
201:
DATE: MARCH 16, 2001
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
DONALD R. HUBBS, P. E
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS
AND STAFFED MANAGER OFA MENT PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF
U. S. HIGHWAY ONE – CITY OF SEBASTIAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. U W -0049 -DS
RESOLUTIONS I & II – PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
April 3, 2001
M
BACKGROUND
On March 8, 2000, the City of Sebastian City Council requested that Indian River County
proceed with a water line extension project, due to requests from the benefiting U. S. #1 property
owners.
On July 11, 2000, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners authorized the
Department of Utility Services to proceed with the design engineering work and award a contract
for survey services based on the most favorable quote, in preparation for the special assessment
project which will facilitate the extension of water lines along the West Side of U.S. No 1. This
project area to be served, will include properties between the Wal -mart Super Center and County
Road 512. Preliminary design has been completed by the Department of Utility Services staff.
On March 8, 2001 staff met with the City Manager at the Sebastian City Hall and provided a
status review of this project. The projects cost estimate, a summary assessment schedule and
map were reviewed and left with the City Manager and City Engineer. Enclosed is a letter dated
March 12, 2001 from the City Manager requesting the Utility Department to proceed with this
project- ( Attachment - 5 )
We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project. (see attached
Attachment 1 — copy of minutes of BCC meeting, Attachment 2 —Plat Map, and Attachment 3 —
Schedule of Properties to benefit ).
ANALYSIS
There are 97 properties, between the Wal-Mart Super Center and County Road 512, which may
benefit from this proposed water line Extension. In most water assessment projects, properties
along both sides of a waterline (typical street situation) share proportionately in the project cost.
In this proposed project, which is bordered by U.S. Highway No. 1 and the FEC Railway, this is
not the case. Properties on one side only will be responsible for the project cost.
Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The attached map
(ATTACHMENT 2) displays the area to benefit from the assessment project.
The total estimated project cost (ATTACHMENT 4) and amount to be assessed, including
engineering construction and administration is S 677,406.00 ( Rounded ). The estimated cost per
square foot is S 0.352168 (rounded).
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water
line route. In the interim, funding will be from the Assessment Fund No. 473-000-169-397.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Resolutions, which approve the preliminary assessment roll and establish the
public hearing date.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: I -Minutes BCC meeting July 11, 2000.
2 -Plat Map d/
3 -Schedule of Properties / Preliminary Assessment Roll
4 -Estimated Project Cost
5 -Letter 3/12/01 from the City Manager of Sebastian
April 3, 2001
86
�� PG d 7
BACKGROUND
On March 8, 2000, the City of Sebastian City Council requested that Indian River County
proceed with a water line extension project, due to requests from the benefiting U. S. #1 property
owners.
On July 11, 2000, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners authorized the
Department of Utility Services to proceed with the design engineering work and award a contract
for survey services based on the most favorable quote, in preparation for the special assessment
project which will facilitate the extension of water lines along the West Side of U.S. No 1. This
project area to be served, will include properties between the Wal -mart Super Center and County
Road 512. Preliminary design has been completed by the Department of Utility Services staff.
On March 8, 2001 staff met with the City Manager at the Sebastian City Hall and provided a
status review of this project. The projects cost estimate, a summary assessment schedule and
map were reviewed and left with the City Manager and City Engineer. Enclosed is a letter dated
March 12, 2001 from the City Manager requesting the Utility Department to proceed with this
project- ( Attachment - 5 )
We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project. (see attached
Attachment 1 — copy of minutes of BCC meeting, Attachment 2 —Plat Map, and Attachment 3 —
Schedule of Properties to benefit ).
ANALYSIS
There are 97 properties, between the Wal-Mart Super Center and County Road 512, which may
benefit from this proposed water line Extension. In most water assessment projects, properties
along both sides of a waterline (typical street situation) share proportionately in the project cost.
In this proposed project, which is bordered by U.S. Highway No. 1 and the FEC Railway, this is
not the case. Properties on one side only will be responsible for the project cost.
Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The attached map
(ATTACHMENT 2) displays the area to benefit from the assessment project.
The total estimated project cost (ATTACHMENT 4) and amount to be assessed, including
engineering construction and administration is S 677,406.00 ( Rounded ). The estimated cost per
square foot is S 0.352168 (rounded).
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water
line route. In the interim, funding will be from the Assessment Fund No. 473-000-169-397.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Resolutions, which approve the preliminary assessment roll and establish the
public hearing date.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: I -Minutes BCC meeting July 11, 2000.
2 -Plat Map d/
3 -Schedule of Properties / Preliminary Assessment Roll
4 -Estimated Project Cost
5 -Letter 3/12/01 from the City Manager of Sebastian
April 3, 2001
86
�� PG d 7
BACKGROUND
On March 8, 2000, the City of Sebastian City Council requested that Indian River County
proceed with a water line extension project, due to requests from the benefiting U. S. #1 property
owners.
On July 11, 2000, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners authorized the
Department of Utility Services to proceed with the design engineering work and award a contract
for survey services based on the most favorable quote, in preparation for the special assessment
project which will facilitate the extension of water lines along the West Side of U.S. No 1. This
project area to be served, will include properties between the Wal -mart Super Center and County
Road 512. Preliminary design has been completed by the Department of Utility Services staff.
On March 8, 2001 staff met with the City Manager at the Sebastian City Hall and provided a
status review of this project. The projects cost estimate, a summary assessment schedule and
map were reviewed and left with the City Manager and City Engineer. Enclosed is a letter dated
March 12, 2001 from the City Manager requesting the Utility Department to proceed with this
project- ( Attachment - 5 )
We are now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project. (see attached
Attachment 1 — copy of minutes of BCC meeting, Attachment 2 —Plat Map, and Attachment 3 —
Schedule of Properties to benefit ).
ANALYSIS
There are 97 properties, between the Wal-Mart Super Center and County Road 512, which may
benefit from this proposed water line Extension. In most water assessment projects, properties
along both sides of a waterline (typical street situation) share proportionately in the project cost.
In this proposed project, which is bordered by U.S. Highway No. 1 and the FEC Railway, this is
not the case. Properties on one side only will be responsible for the project cost.
Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The attached map
(ATTACHMENT 2) displays the area to benefit from the assessment project.
The total estimated project cost (ATTACHMENT 4) and amount to be assessed, including
engineering construction and administration is S 677,406.00 ( Rounded ). The estimated cost per
square foot is S 0.352168 (rounded).
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water
line route. In the interim, funding will be from the Assessment Fund No. 473-000-169-397.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Resolutions, which approve the preliminary assessment roll and establish the
public hearing date.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: I -Minutes BCC meeting July 11, 2000.
2 -Plat Map d/
3 -Schedule of Properties / Preliminary Assessment Roll
4 -Estimated Project Cost
5 -Letter 3/12/01 from the City Manager of Sebastian
April 3, 2001
86
�� PG d 7
Commissioner Adams supported holding the hearing in the County Commission
Chambers since the meeting held in Sebastian on the evening of March 20, 2001, on this
matter, did not draw many people and only one of them spoke.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-037 providing for water expansion on the
west side of US Highway One (Between the Wal-Mart
Supercenter and County Road 512) in the city of Sebastian,
Florida, providing the total estimated cost, method of payment
of assessments, number of annual installments, and description
of the area to be served.
RESOLUTION NO, 2001- 037
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR WATER
EXPANSION ON THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE (BETWEEN
THE WAL-MART SUPERCENTER AND COUNTY ROAD 512) IN THE CITY
OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA; PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST,
METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL
INSTALLMENTS, AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA TO BE SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined
that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the
county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
properties to be serviced by a water main extension on the west side of U.S. Highway One
(between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512) in the City of Sebastian,
Florida,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 97
Properties on the west side of U.S. Highway One, between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and
County Road 512 in the City of Sebastian, Florida, and that the cost thereof shall be
specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of
The Code of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $677,406 (rounded) or $0.352168 (rounded) per
square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat
on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots
and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or
specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the
special assessments.
April 3, 2001
m
Commissioner Adams supported holding the hearing in the County Commission
Chambers since the meeting held in Sebastian on the evening of March 20, 2001, on this
matter, did not draw many people and only one of them spoke.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-037 providing for water expansion on the
west side of US Highway One (Between the Wal-Mart
Supercenter and County Road 512) in the city of Sebastian,
Florida, providing the total estimated cost, method of payment
of assessments, number of annual installments, and description
of the area to be served.
RESOLUTION NO, 2001- 037
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR WATER
EXPANSION ON THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE (BETWEEN
THE WAL-MART SUPERCENTER AND COUNTY ROAD 512) IN THE CITY
OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA; PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST,
METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL
INSTALLMENTS, AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA TO BE SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined
that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the
county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
properties to be serviced by a water main extension on the west side of U.S. Highway One
(between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512) in the City of Sebastian,
Florida,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 97
Properties on the west side of U.S. Highway One, between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and
County Road 512 in the City of Sebastian, Florida, and that the cost thereof shall be
specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of
The Code of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $677,406 (rounded) or $0.352168 (rounded) per
square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat
on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots
and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or
specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the
special assessments.
April 3, 2001
m
Commissioner Adams supported holding the hearing in the County Commission
Chambers since the meeting held in Sebastian on the evening of March 20, 2001, on this
matter, did not draw many people and only one of them spoke.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-037 providing for water expansion on the
west side of US Highway One (Between the Wal-Mart
Supercenter and County Road 512) in the city of Sebastian,
Florida, providing the total estimated cost, method of payment
of assessments, number of annual installments, and description
of the area to be served.
RESOLUTION NO, 2001- 037
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR WATER
EXPANSION ON THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE (BETWEEN
THE WAL-MART SUPERCENTER AND COUNTY ROAD 512) IN THE CITY
OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA; PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST,
METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL
INSTALLMENTS, AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA TO BE SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined
that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the
county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
properties to be serviced by a water main extension on the west side of U.S. Highway One
(between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512) in the City of Sebastian,
Florida,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 97
Properties on the west side of U.S. Highway One, between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and
County Road 512 in the City of Sebastian, Florida, and that the cost thereof shall be
specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206.09 of
The Code of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $677,406 (rounded) or $0.352168 (rounded) per
square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the assessment plat
on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be levied against all lots
and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or
specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment plat with respect to the
special assessments.
April 3, 2001
m
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.352168 (rounded) per square foot shall be
assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This
assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after
the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days
after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special
assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not
paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal
plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-112% of the principal
not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until
paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the project is
completed.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to
be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed
improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in
connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department
shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be
published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing as
required by Section 206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
motion was seconded by Commissioner. Stanbri dge and, upon being put to advo ee
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day
of April, 2001.
Atte Barton, Cle
�j
t
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
t
17 iC �7r
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
m¢ls ane La Au4'Ovea Dale
i gCrT1 in /jam
Legal
5uag�!
Risk Nlgr. I , J
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.352168 (rounded) per square foot shall be
assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This
assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after
the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days
after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special
assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not
paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal
plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-112% of the principal
not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until
paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the project is
completed.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to
be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed
improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in
connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department
shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be
published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing as
required by Section 206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
motion was seconded by Commissioner. Stanbri dge and, upon being put to advo ee
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day
of April, 2001.
Atte Barton, Cle
�j
t
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
t
17 iC �7r
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
m¢ls ane La Au4'Ovea Dale
i gCrT1 in /jam
Legal
5uag�!
Risk Nlgr. I , J
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.352168 (rounded) per square foot shall be
assessed against each of the properties designated on the assessment plat. This
assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County Commissioners after
the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days
after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special
assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If not
paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of principal
plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-112% of the principal
not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear interest until
paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when the project is
completed.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to
be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed
improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in
connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department
shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be
published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing as
required by Section 206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
motion was seconded by Commissioner. Stanbri dge and, upon being put to advo ee
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day
of April, 2001.
Atte Barton, Cle
�j
t
Deputy Clerk
April 3, 2001
t
17 iC �7r
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
m¢ls ane La Au4'Ovea Dale
i gCrT1 in /jam
Legal
5uag�!
Risk Nlgr. I , J
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-038 setting a time and place at which the
owners of properties located on the west side of US Highway
One between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512
in the city of Sebastian, Florida, and other interested persons,
may appear before the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County and be heard as to the propriety and
advisability of constructing the water main extension, as to the
cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property
benefitted thereby.
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- nig
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT
WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE BETWEEN THE WAL-MART SUPERCENTER AND
COUNTY ROAD 512 IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AND OTHER
INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND BE HEARD
AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE
WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE
MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT
THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY
BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 2001- 037 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens
of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 97 properties located on the west side
of U.S. Highway One between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512 in the City of
Sebastian, Florida; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect
thereto shall be $0.352168 (rounded) per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be
completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06 of the Code of Indian River provides that the Board of
County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County
April 3, 2001
89
�17PG777
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-038 setting a time and place at which the
owners of properties located on the west side of US Highway
One between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512
in the city of Sebastian, Florida, and other interested persons,
may appear before the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County and be heard as to the propriety and
advisability of constructing the water main extension, as to the
cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property
benefitted thereby.
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- nig
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT
WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE BETWEEN THE WAL-MART SUPERCENTER AND
COUNTY ROAD 512 IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AND OTHER
INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND BE HEARD
AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE
WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE
MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT
THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY
BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 2001- 037 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens
of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 97 properties located on the west side
of U.S. Highway One between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512 in the City of
Sebastian, Florida; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect
thereto shall be $0.352168 (rounded) per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be
completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06 of the Code of Indian River provides that the Board of
County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County
April 3, 2001
89
�17PG777
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2001-038 setting a time and place at which the
owners of properties located on the west side of US Highway
One between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512
in the city of Sebastian, Florida, and other interested persons,
may appear before the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County and be heard as to the propriety and
advisability of constructing the water main extension, as to the
cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be specially assessed against each property
benefitted thereby.
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- nig
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT
WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF U.S. HIGHWAY ONE BETWEEN THE WAL-MART SUPERCENTER AND
COUNTY ROAD 512 IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AND OTHER
INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND BE HEARD
AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF CONSTRUCTING THE
WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE
MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT
THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY
BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 2001- 037 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens
of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 97 properties located on the west side
of U.S. Highway One between the Wal-Mart Supercenter and County Road 512 in the City of
Sebastian, Florida; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect
thereto shall be $0.352168 (rounded) per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be
completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06 of the Code of Indian River provides that the Board of
County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County
April 3, 2001
89
�17PG777
Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD -OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County
Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, May 1, 2001, at which time the
owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear
before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the
properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment
plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments
against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the
area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility
Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the
Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week
prior to the date of the hearing.
4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each
property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place,
which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at
his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner StanhririgP and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice ChairmcIh Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd
day of April, 2001. —
Atte K. Barton, Cl
r �
Bv,
Deputy Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By -7;; � CZ.
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
(CLERK'S NOTE: LENGTHY ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE WITH
THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD.)
April 3, 2001
90
Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD -OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County
Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, May 1, 2001, at which time the
owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear
before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the
properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment
plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments
against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the
area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility
Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the
Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week
prior to the date of the hearing.
4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each
property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place,
which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at
his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner StanhririgP and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice ChairmcIh Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd
day of April, 2001. —
Atte K. Barton, Cl
r �
Bv,
Deputy Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By -7;; � CZ.
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
(CLERK'S NOTE: LENGTHY ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE WITH
THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD.)
April 3, 2001
90
Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD -OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County
Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, May 1, 2001, at which time the
owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear
before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the
properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment
plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments
against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment plat showing the
area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of Utility
Services any week day from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the
Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week
prior to the date of the hearing.
4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each
property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place,
which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at
his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner StanhririgP and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice ChairmcIh Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd
day of April, 2001. —
Atte K. Barton, Cl
r �
Bv,
Deputy Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By -7;; � CZ.
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
(CLERK'S NOTE: LENGTHY ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE WITH
THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD.)
April 3, 2001
90
ILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY C
UPDATE 2001/2002
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
March 21, 2001
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
Indian River County Administration Building
184025 1h Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365
Reference: Children's Services Advisory Committee Plan Update 2001/2002
Indian River County Commissioners:
Enclosed is a copy of the Plan Update 2001/2002. This document was reviewed and approved
by the Children's Services Advisory Committee on March 20, 2001 and that Committee
recommends approval of the Indian River County Commission.
Yours truly, /
�p Z;�
Joyce Johnston -Carlson, Director
Indian River County Human Services
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, seconded by
Vice Chairman Stanbridge, to approve the recommendation.
I_I
Chairman Ginn again recommended that a needs assessment be performed. She knew
it is not only the needs assessment committee but also the United Way and Kay Youngbluth
who would like to see us get a comprehensive needs assessment done. She felt it quite
important to stick to the Guidelines.
Health Department Administrator Jean Kline advised this is the third and final year
for the update; next year is the County's next go at a comprehensive needs assessment for
children's services and children's needs in our community, including the asset mapping. It
April 3, 2001
91
ILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY C
UPDATE 2001/2002
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
March 21, 2001
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
Indian River County Administration Building
184025 1h Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365
Reference: Children's Services Advisory Committee Plan Update 2001/2002
Indian River County Commissioners:
Enclosed is a copy of the Plan Update 2001/2002. This document was reviewed and approved
by the Children's Services Advisory Committee on March 20, 2001 and that Committee
recommends approval of the Indian River County Commission.
Yours truly, /
�p Z;�
Joyce Johnston -Carlson, Director
Indian River County Human Services
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, seconded by
Vice Chairman Stanbridge, to approve the recommendation.
I_I
Chairman Ginn again recommended that a needs assessment be performed. She knew
it is not only the needs assessment committee but also the United Way and Kay Youngbluth
who would like to see us get a comprehensive needs assessment done. She felt it quite
important to stick to the Guidelines.
Health Department Administrator Jean Kline advised this is the third and final year
for the update; next year is the County's next go at a comprehensive needs assessment for
children's services and children's needs in our community, including the asset mapping. It
April 3, 2001
91
ILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY C
UPDATE 2001/2002
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 21, 2001:
March 21, 2001
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
Indian River County Administration Building
184025 1h Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365
Reference: Children's Services Advisory Committee Plan Update 2001/2002
Indian River County Commissioners:
Enclosed is a copy of the Plan Update 2001/2002. This document was reviewed and approved
by the Children's Services Advisory Committee on March 20, 2001 and that Committee
recommends approval of the Indian River County Commission.
Yours truly, /
�p Z;�
Joyce Johnston -Carlson, Director
Indian River County Human Services
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, seconded by
Vice Chairman Stanbridge, to approve the recommendation.
I_I
Chairman Ginn again recommended that a needs assessment be performed. She knew
it is not only the needs assessment committee but also the United Way and Kay Youngbluth
who would like to see us get a comprehensive needs assessment done. She felt it quite
important to stick to the Guidelines.
Health Department Administrator Jean Kline advised this is the third and final year
for the update; next year is the County's next go at a comprehensive needs assessment for
children's services and children's needs in our community, including the asset mapping. It
April 3, 2001
91
has been requested that $20,000 be set aside either through the Children's Services Advisory
Board or through the Board of County Commissioners to go for that effort.
Chairman Ginn thought it would take more than $20,000 for it. She thought more
needed to be set aside for it.
Ms. Kline advised that she was hoping to partner with other agencies, and Chairman
Ginn thought that would be excellent.
It seemed to Chairman Ginn that about $100,000 has not been used for the Children's
Services Advisory Committee and their recommendations and she would like to see some of
that money used for the needs assessment. She thought the County could not go into another
3 -year phase without that information and to do so was unfair to the taxpayers. Because we
have not done this for 3 years, we still do not know the level of services available and she
felt it was a critical point.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (Approved the Children's Services
Advisory Committee Plan Update 2001/2002.)
BBA. CHAIRMAN GINN - CENSUS/REAPPORTIONMENT
Chairman Ginn reported that although we have not yet gotten a direct report from the
Census Bureau, information published in the Press Journal and Florida Today newspapers
gives our county a population of over 112,000 for a 25.2% increase. This has not been
available on the Census Bureau's web page or any of their sites. Neither Long -Range
Planning Chief Sasan Rohani or Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem has received any
information. The Reapportionment Committee will not meet again until information has
been received in-house.
April 3, 2001
°C Pi
92
has been requested that $20,000 be set aside either through the Children's Services Advisory
Board or through the Board of County Commissioners to go for that effort.
Chairman Ginn thought it would take more than $20,000 for it. She thought more
needed to be set aside for it.
Ms. Kline advised that she was hoping to partner with other agencies, and Chairman
Ginn thought that would be excellent.
It seemed to Chairman Ginn that about $100,000 has not been used for the Children's
Services Advisory Committee and their recommendations and she would like to see some of
that money used for the needs assessment. She thought the County could not go into another
3 -year phase without that information and to do so was unfair to the taxpayers. Because we
have not done this for 3 years, we still do not know the level of services available and she
felt it was a critical point.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (Approved the Children's Services
Advisory Committee Plan Update 2001/2002.)
BBA. CHAIRMAN GINN - CENSUS/REAPPORTIONMENT
Chairman Ginn reported that although we have not yet gotten a direct report from the
Census Bureau, information published in the Press Journal and Florida Today newspapers
gives our county a population of over 112,000 for a 25.2% increase. This has not been
available on the Census Bureau's web page or any of their sites. Neither Long -Range
Planning Chief Sasan Rohani or Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem has received any
information. The Reapportionment Committee will not meet again until information has
been received in-house.
April 3, 2001
°C Pi
92
has been requested that $20,000 be set aside either through the Children's Services Advisory
Board or through the Board of County Commissioners to go for that effort.
Chairman Ginn thought it would take more than $20,000 for it. She thought more
needed to be set aside for it.
Ms. Kline advised that she was hoping to partner with other agencies, and Chairman
Ginn thought that would be excellent.
It seemed to Chairman Ginn that about $100,000 has not been used for the Children's
Services Advisory Committee and their recommendations and she would like to see some of
that money used for the needs assessment. She thought the County could not go into another
3 -year phase without that information and to do so was unfair to the taxpayers. Because we
have not done this for 3 years, we still do not know the level of services available and she
felt it was a critical point.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (Approved the Children's Services
Advisory Committee Plan Update 2001/2002.)
BBA. CHAIRMAN GINN - CENSUS/REAPPORTIONMENT
Chairman Ginn reported that although we have not yet gotten a direct report from the
Census Bureau, information published in the Press Journal and Florida Today newspapers
gives our county a population of over 112,000 for a 25.2% increase. This has not been
available on the Census Bureau's web page or any of their sites. Neither Long -Range
Planning Chief Sasan Rohani or Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem has received any
information. The Reapportionment Committee will not meet again until information has
been received in-house.
April 3, 2001
°C Pi
92
Commissioner Adams advised that she got the information off the Internet as to
population and race breakdown and also the schedules of release of further data as it is being
input.
Commissioner Macht advised he had gotten it from the National Enquirer standing
in line in the supermarket.
Chairman Ginn understood and called it basic information, but it is needed by
districts, by traffic analysis, zones, and that sort of thing.
Commissioner Adams stated the information does not include the error rate which is
.2% or so. It also says that the district data is not due out until this summer sometime, so it
will be a while before all the other information tracks out.
It was determined the increase was within 2% of BEBR's (University of Florida's
Bureau of Economic and Business Research) figures throughout the state. It was felt the
Board could continue to look to them for good statistics.
13.13.1. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE -
2001-039 SUPPORTING THE INDIAN RIVEI
HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PF
FLORIDA DEPARTMF,NT OF TR A NCnnurr A T
The Board reviewed the proposed resolution in the backup.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 2001-03 9 supporting the Indian River Lagoon Scenic
Highway beautification grant proposal, and directed the Clerk
to the Board of County Commissioners to send a copy of the
resolution to the Florida Department of Transportation.
April 3, 2001
93
N
Commissioner Adams advised that she got the information off the Internet as to
population and race breakdown and also the schedules of release of further data as it is being
input.
Commissioner Macht advised he had gotten it from the National Enquirer standing
in line in the supermarket.
Chairman Ginn understood and called it basic information, but it is needed by
districts, by traffic analysis, zones, and that sort of thing.
Commissioner Adams stated the information does not include the error rate which is
.2% or so. It also says that the district data is not due out until this summer sometime, so it
will be a while before all the other information tracks out.
It was determined the increase was within 2% of BEBR's (University of Florida's
Bureau of Economic and Business Research) figures throughout the state. It was felt the
Board could continue to look to them for good statistics.
13.13.1. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE -
2001-039 SUPPORTING THE INDIAN RIVEI
HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PF
FLORIDA DEPARTMF,NT OF TR A NCnnurr A T
The Board reviewed the proposed resolution in the backup.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 2001-03 9 supporting the Indian River Lagoon Scenic
Highway beautification grant proposal, and directed the Clerk
to the Board of County Commissioners to send a copy of the
resolution to the Florida Department of Transportation.
April 3, 2001
93
N
Commissioner Adams advised that she got the information off the Internet as to
population and race breakdown and also the schedules of release of further data as it is being
input.
Commissioner Macht advised he had gotten it from the National Enquirer standing
in line in the supermarket.
Chairman Ginn understood and called it basic information, but it is needed by
districts, by traffic analysis, zones, and that sort of thing.
Commissioner Adams stated the information does not include the error rate which is
.2% or so. It also says that the district data is not due out until this summer sometime, so it
will be a while before all the other information tracks out.
It was determined the increase was within 2% of BEBR's (University of Florida's
Bureau of Economic and Business Research) figures throughout the state. It was felt the
Board could continue to look to them for good statistics.
13.13.1. VICE CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE -
2001-039 SUPPORTING THE INDIAN RIVEI
HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PF
FLORIDA DEPARTMF,NT OF TR A NCnnurr A T
The Board reviewed the proposed resolution in the backup.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 2001-03 9 supporting the Indian River Lagoon Scenic
Highway beautification grant proposal, and directed the Clerk
to the Board of County Commissioners to send a copy of the
resolution to the Florida Department of Transportation.
April 3, 2001
93
N
RESOLUTION 2001- 039
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE
INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SCENIC HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PROPOSAL, AND
DIRECTING THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO SEND A
COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
WHEREAS, many roadside areas and median strips abutting Department of
Transportation right-of-way areas should be maintained and attractively landscaped; and
WHEREAS, the use of native, drought -tolerant plants for landscaping, and the use
of innovative irrigation techniques will conserve vital water supplies; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County is supportive of the Scenic Highway Program and
supports inter -county efforts to beautify the Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is supportive of future Scenic
Highway Beautification Applications focusing on similar plantings in right-of-way areas
within Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway Coalition's Beautification
grant proposal represents a regional approach to beautifying our state's -newest scenic
highway,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida, as follows:
1. The Board of County Commissioners supports the Indian River Lagoon
Scenic Highway Beautification Grant Proposal.
If 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is directed to send a copy
of this Resolution to the Florida Department of Transportation.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n and, upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
April 3, 2001
94
4 !
PG 78
RESOLUTION 2001- 039
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE
INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SCENIC HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PROPOSAL, AND
DIRECTING THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO SEND A
COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
WHEREAS, many roadside areas and median strips abutting Department of
Transportation right-of-way areas should be maintained and attractively landscaped; and
WHEREAS, the use of native, drought -tolerant plants for landscaping, and the use
of innovative irrigation techniques will conserve vital water supplies; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County is supportive of the Scenic Highway Program and
supports inter -county efforts to beautify the Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is supportive of future Scenic
Highway Beautification Applications focusing on similar plantings in right-of-way areas
within Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway Coalition's Beautification
grant proposal represents a regional approach to beautifying our state's -newest scenic
highway,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida, as follows:
1. The Board of County Commissioners supports the Indian River Lagoon
Scenic Highway Beautification Grant Proposal.
If 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is directed to send a copy
of this Resolution to the Florida Department of Transportation.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n and, upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
April 3, 2001
94
4 !
PG 78
RESOLUTION 2001- 039
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE
INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SCENIC HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION GRANT PROPOSAL, AND
DIRECTING THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO SEND A
COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
WHEREAS, many roadside areas and median strips abutting Department of
Transportation right-of-way areas should be maintained and attractively landscaped; and
WHEREAS, the use of native, drought -tolerant plants for landscaping, and the use
of innovative irrigation techniques will conserve vital water supplies; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County is supportive of the Scenic Highway Program and
supports inter -county efforts to beautify the Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is supportive of future Scenic
Highway Beautification Applications focusing on similar plantings in right-of-way areas
within Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway Coalition's Beautification
grant proposal represents a regional approach to beautifying our state's -newest scenic
highway,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida, as follows:
1. The Board of County Commissioners supports the Indian River Lagoon
Scenic Highway Beautification Grant Proposal.
If 2. The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is directed to send a copy
of this Resolution to the Florida Department of Transportation.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n and, upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
April 3, 2001
94
4 !
PG 78
go
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
3rd day of Ai)ri 1 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, C
--� c�
B �t.crt
Deputy Clerk
13.13.2. VI
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By�u�.Q/
Caroline D. Ginn i
Chairman
V LL A U 1 HUKIZATION IN REGARD TO LOST TREE ISLANDS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested authorization to travel on matters related to her
appointment as the lead person in Lost Tree Islands matters.
14.A.
None,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized out -
of -county travel for Vice Chairman Stanbridge in matters related
to Lost Tree Islands.
ES DISTRICT
14.13. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are
being prepared separately.
April 3, 2001
95
BK I I et %G r''
go
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
3rd day of Ai)ri 1 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, C
--� c�
B �t.crt
Deputy Clerk
13.13.2. VI
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By�u�.Q/
Caroline D. Ginn i
Chairman
V LL A U 1 HUKIZATION IN REGARD TO LOST TREE ISLANDS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested authorization to travel on matters related to her
appointment as the lead person in Lost Tree Islands matters.
14.A.
None,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized out -
of -county travel for Vice Chairman Stanbridge in matters related
to Lost Tree Islands.
ES DISTRICT
14.13. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are
being prepared separately.
April 3, 2001
95
BK I I et %G r''
go
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
3rd day of Ai)ri 1 2001.
Attest: J. K. Barton, C
--� c�
B �t.crt
Deputy Clerk
13.13.2. VI
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By�u�.Q/
Caroline D. Ginn i
Chairman
V LL A U 1 HUKIZATION IN REGARD TO LOST TREE ISLANDS
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested authorization to travel on matters related to her
appointment as the lead person in Lost Tree Islands matters.
14.A.
None,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized out -
of -county travel for Vice Chairman Stanbridge in matters related
to Lost Tree Islands.
ES DISTRICT
14.13. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that following the meeting, the Commissioners would sit
as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those minutes are
being prepared separately.
April 3, 2001
95
BK I I et %G r''
14.C. None. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 11:18 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved
April 3, 2001
B $ F P G
•o
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
14.C. None. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 11:18 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved
April 3, 2001
B $ F P G
•o
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
14.C. None. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 11:18 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
Minutes approved
April 3, 2001
B $ F P G
•o
Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman