HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/9/2002MINUTES ATTACHED
SHARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 2002 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ruth NI. Stanbridge, Chairman
John \A . Tippin, Vice Chairman
Fran B. Adams
Caroline D. Ginn
Kenneth R. Macht
D istrict 2
District 4
D istrict 1
D istrict
D istrict 3
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Paul (r. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to RCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
BACKUP
PAGES
Rev. Tony Taylor
Christ by the Sea United Methodist
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Comm. Fran B. Adams
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEiMS
Nev page 329 - Color map for Item 11.H.
Item 13.D. -Report on Utilities Advisor} Committee Meeting Concerning Sludge
MOVED: Item 8 to Consent Agenda Item 7.1..
PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Present ition of Proclamation Designating April, 2002 as Florida
Confederate History Month in Indian River County, Florida
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular meeting of March 19, 2002
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1) Fellsmere Water Control Dist. Water Control Plan
2) I.R. Faints Water Control Dist. Water Cont. Plan
3) Delta Fanns Water Cont. Dist. Water Cont. Plan
4) Vero Lakes Water Cont. Dist. Water Cont. Plan
5) Seb. Riv. Water Cont. Dist. Water Cont. Plan
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated March 27, 2002)
Board Authorization for John's Island Water Manage-
ment, Inc. to Continue Using a Well Located in the Old
Winter Beach Road Right -of -Way
(memorandum dated March 30, 2002)
Approval of Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Concep-
tual Approval Agreement and Confidentiality Agreement
for Cost -Share Acquisition of the Hallstrom Fannstead
(memorandum dated March 27, 2002)
Approval of Interlocal Agreement for the Creation of the
Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization
(memorandum dated March 9, 2002)
IRC Hid #4049 Furnish and install galvanized fence at
two (2) IRC conservation areas — Parks Division
(memorandum dated April 1, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGE'S
Traffic Control Device Ledger
(memorandum dated March 19, 2002) 96-112
Renewal of Commercial Lease Agreement Located at
the Vero Beach Municipal Airport — Informational
Item from Sheriff Roy Raymond
(letter dated February 21, 2002) 113-114
Fnvironmental Learning Center — Landfill Assessments
on Leased Property
(memorandum dated March 28, 2002)
Authorization Issue Request for Proposals for ADA
Study Update
(memorandum dated April 3, 2002)
120-123
CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.)
K. Cal Builder's Request for Final Plat Approval for
Cal Builders Subdivision
(memorandum dated March 25, 2002)
BACKLP
PAGES
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Sheriff Roy Raymond:
Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program — Request for Grant Dollars
(letter dated April 1, 2002)
129-136
PUBLIC ITEiMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, REGARDING USE OF THE AFFIDAVIT
OF EXEMPTION PROCESS FOR DIVIDING PRO-
PERTIES, AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS
OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGrULATIONS
(LDRS): CHAPTER 911, ZONING, AND CHAPTER 913
SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS; AND PROVIDING FOR
REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS CODIFI-
CATION, SEVERABILI FY AND EFFECTIVE DA IE
Request to Amend the Affidavit of Exemption Regu-
lations of LDR Sections 911.06(4) and 913.06(5)
(Legislative)
(memorandum dated April 1, 2002)
PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from James D. St. Clair to discuss
'the noise problem with the St. Edward's Upper
School air conditioners"
(letter dated April 2, 2002)
Request from Brian Heady to discuss "govern-
ing by deception and lies ' and "the cost to county
taxpayers of such malfeasance"
(letter dated April 3, 2002)
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
BACKUP
PAGES
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
Emergency Services
None
General Services
1. Transfer / Assignment of Lease for the Clifford
Youth Activity Center
(memorandum dated April 1, 2002)
2. Authorization. to Sell Real Property to Highest
Bidder
(memorandum dated April 1, 2002)
176-256
Change of Control of CATV Franchise AT&T
and Comcast
(memorandum dated April 2, 2002)
Leisure Services
None
263-279
Office of Management and Budget
None
Personnel
None
G. Public Works
1 _ Approval of Release of Retainage for Gifford
Area Stoimwater Improvement Project
(memorandum dated April 1, 2002)
2. License Agreement for Bridgewater Invest-
ments LLC to use County Property along Indian
River Boulevard
(memorandum dated March 27, 2002)
Utilities
Sebastian Water Expansion Phase III -D & E
Resolutions I and II
(memorandun dated April 1, 2002)
280-282
283-288
BACKUP
PAGES
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
13. COILMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Updates
Vice Chairman John W. Tiepin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A Emergency Services District
None
Solid Waste Disposal District
Environmental Control Board
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bcc1.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and 'North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00
p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m.
Meetinz broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband; Channel 27 in Sebastian.
•
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF APRIL 9, 2002
1 CALL TO ORDER
1
2. INVOCATION
1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 1
5. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 2002 AS FLORIDA
CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 19, 2002 3
7 CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. Reports 4
7.B. Approval of Warrants 4
7.C. John's Island Water Management, Inc. - Use of Well Located in the Old 4
Winter Beach Road Right -of -Way (SJRWMD) 12
7.D. Florida Communities Trust (FCT) - Conceptual Approval Agreement and
Confidentiality Agreement for Cost -Share Acquisition of the Hallstrom
Farmstead
15
7 E Revised Interlocal Agreement - Florida Department of Transportation, City
of Vero Beach, City of Sebastian, City of Fellsmere, Town of Indian River
Shores, Town of Orchid, School District of Indian River County - Creation
of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization - (Two
Additional Voting Members) 18
7.F. Bid 44049 - Furnish and Install Galvanized Fence at North Sebastian
Conservation Area and Flinn Tract Conservation Area (Parks Division)
7.G. Resolution No. 2002-019- Traffic Control Device Ledger 20
22
1
Oil
•
7.H. Renewal of Commercial Lease Agreement at the Vero Beach Municipal
Airport - Informational Item from Sheriff Roy Raymond 24
7.1. Environmental Learning Center - Landfill Assessments on Lease Property
Payment Schedule 27
7.J. Request for Proposals for ADA Study Update Authorization to Issue 28
7.K. Cal Builders Subdivision - Final Plat Approval Requested by Cal Builders
29
7 L Sheriff Roy Raymond - U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice
Assistance Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program - Request for Grant
Dollars
31
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-017 - AMENDMENT TO
AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION REGULATIONS OF LDR SECTIONS
911.06(4) AND 913.06(5) (Legislative) 33
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION I FEM - REQUEST FROM JAMES D. ST. CLAIR TO
DISCUSS ` THE NOISF PROBLEM WITH THE ST EDWARD'S UPPER
SCHOOL AIR CONDITIONERS" 42
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM BRIAN HEADY TO
DISCUSS ` GOVERNING BY DECEPTION AND LIES" AND "THE COST TO
COUNTY TAXPAYERS OF SUCH MALFEASANCE" 42
11.C.1.
TRANSFER/ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE FOR THE GIFFORD YOUTH
ACTIVITY CENTER 42
11.C.2. AUTHORIZATION TO SELL COUNTY -OWNED REAL PROPERTY
TO HIGHEST BIDDER - LOTS 185, 199, AND 200, BLOCK 14 W. E
GEOFFREYS SUBDIVISION 45
11.C.3. CABLE TV FRANCHISE - COMBINE AT&T AND COMCAST
CORPORATIONS
47
11.G.L GIFFORD AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. - RELEASE OF RETAINAGE AND
REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT 48
11.0.2. LICENSE FOR USE OF COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A SIGN
ALONG INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - BRIDGEWATER
INVESTMENT, LLC 50
2
•
•
11.H.1. RESOLUTION NOS 2002-020 AND 2002-021 - SEBASTIAN WATER
EXPANSION PHASE III -D & E - RESOLUTIONS I A\D II
51
13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - PELICA\ ISLAND NATURAL WILDLIFE
REFUGE PARTNERSHIP CEREMONY
57
13.D. COMMISSIONER GI\\ - REPORT ON UTILITIES ADVISORY
COMMITTEE'S RECOMME\DATIONS CONCERNING ACCEPTANCE OF
SLUDGE FROM INDIANTOWN COMPANY, INC.
57
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
58
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
58
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
58
3
• •
April 9, 2002
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25`1' Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, April 9, 2002. Present were Ruth Stanbridge, Chairman; John W. Tippin, Vice
Chairman; Commissioners Fran B. Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also
present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Tony Taylor, Christ by the Sea United Methodist Church, delivered the
invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Adams led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Stanbridge announced that a new page 329 (color map) had been provided
for item 11.H. and that the Sheriff's Office had requested that Item 8 be moved to the
Consent Agenda and it would be Item 7.L.
April 9, 2002
1
•
Commissioner Ginn requested the addition of Item 13.D. a report on the Utilities
Advisory Committee's meeting with respect to accepting sludge from other Jurisdictions.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously made the above
additions and changes to the agenda.
5. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 2002 AS FLORIDA
CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
The Chairman read the following proclamation and presented it to Gene Lee who was
representing the Sons of Confederate Veterans of Indian River County. Mr. Lee accepted
the proclamation with thanks and noted that we should remember our ancestors and honor
those simple people who fought for their homes in the South.
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING APRIL, 2002
AS FLORIDA CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH IN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, April is the month in which the Confederate States of America began
and ended their four-year struggle for a sovereign and independent nation; and
WHEREAS, our State Constitution sets aside April 26th as a day to observe and
honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the Civil War; and
WHEREAS, in proportion to its population, Florida contributed more soldiers and
sailors to the Confederate services than any other state and
WHEREAS, all Floridians should be knowledgeable of the history of the Civil War
battles fought here, including those at Olustee and at Natural Bridge; and
April 9, 2002
2
•
•
1
WHEREAS, we study the war between the Blue and the Gray for the same
reason we study all wars, with a view to understanding the historical events which
compelled them, so we may continue to learn to live together and seek to avoid future
conflicts:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of April, 2002
be designated as
FLORIDA CONFEDERATE HISTORY MONTH
in Indian River County, and the Board urges all residents to engage in historical study of
the events of 1861 to 1865 and to solemnly contemplate that time.
Adopted this 9th day of April, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
'1
-%`2 ,72)
Ruth Stanbridge, Chairman
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 19, 2002
fhe Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the
Regular _Meeting of March 19, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 19, 2002, as written
and distributed.
April 9, 2002
J
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Adams requested that Item 7.F. be separated from the Consent Agenda
for clarification.
7.A. Reports
The following reports were received and placed on file In the Office of the Clerk to
the Board:
Fellsmere Water Control District Water Control Plan
Indian River Farms Water Control District Water Control Plan
Delta Farms Water Control District Water Control Plan
Vero Lakes Water Control District Water Control Plan
Sebastian River Water Control District Water Control Plan
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 27, 2002:
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FROM:
HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
March 27, 2002
APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FIN
ANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all vAarrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached List of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of March 21, 2002 to March 28, 2002.
Attachment:
April 9, 2002
4
•
•
O\ MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk for the period March 21-28,
2002, as requested.
CHECK
NUMBER
O 02166
O 02166
O 021668
O 021669
O 021670
O 021671
O 021672
O 021673
O 021674
O 021675
O 021676
O 021677
O 021678
O 021679
O 021680
O 021681
O 318180
O 319210
O 320333
O 320334
O 320335
O 320336
O 320337
O 320338
O 320339
O 320340
O 320341
O 320342
O 320343
O 320344
O 320345
O 320346
O 320347
O 320348
O 320349
O 320350
O 320351
O 320352
O 320353
O 320354
O 320355
O 320356
O 320357
O 320358
O 320359
O 320360
NAME
6 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769
7 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
S TATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
B UREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
NACO/SOUTHEAST
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
FL SDU
BETTER COPY CENTER, A
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
AMERICAS HEALTH CHOICE
AMAZON.COM CREDIT
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
ALBERTSON'S #4357
AMERICAN BUSINESS INTERIORS
AMERICAN CONCRETE INDUSTRIES,
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL
ANIMAL HOSPITAL, THE
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
ADAMSON, RONALD
ABS PUMPS, INC
AMERITREND CORPORATION
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION
ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB
ASCO GARAGE DOOR CO
A T & T
AMERITREND HOMES
ALBERTSON'S
ALL COUNTY MOWER & EOUIDNIENT
ALLEN, CHARLOTTE
ALL CREATURES GREAT & SMALL
AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE
AERC.COM, INC
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ALLIED TRAILER SALES & RENTALS
ADT
April 9, 2002
5
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-14
2002-03-14
2002-03-21
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-25
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-03-26
2002-02-21
2002-03-07
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,019.06
1,964.32
11,010.60
138.50
37.75
115.33
245.00
50.00
920.41
2,500.00
80,991.33
193.86
9,969.00
354.93
132,46
8,157.87
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
706.94
432.50
1,288.90
836.15
5,873.52
420.00
35.00
15.00
1,598.57
601.30
2,610.15
1,061.26
637.00
1,500.00
59.00
232.93
112.50
148.30
1,500.00
44.69
59.40
38.00
26.00
--2.23
359.04
610.00
'_50.00
82.50
CHECK
NUMBER
O 320361
O 320362
O 320363
O 320364
O 320365
O 320366
O 320367
O 320368
O 320369
O 320370
O 320371
O 320372
O 320373
O 320374
O 320375
O 320376
O 320377
O 320378
O 320379
O 320380
O 320381
O 320382
O 320383
0320384
O 320385
O 320386
O 320387
0320388
O 320389
O 320390
0320391
O 320392
O 320393
O 320394
O 320395
O 320396
O 320397
O 320398
O 320399
O 320400
O 320401
O 320402
O 320403
O 320404
NAME
AYERS, PATRICK
ALLOCA, KATHRYN
AMERICAS HEALTH
ATTORNEY OFFICE OF MORGAN
AMERIGAS
ALARM PARTNERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BUREAU OF ECONOMIC & BUSINESS
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BURGOON BERGER
BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
BAKER COUNTY HISTORICAL
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BELLSOUTH
B RENNAN, RANDALL
B ELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
BMG
BRIGGS EQUIPMENT
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BROWNING, CARLEAN
BALL, ARTHUR G
BATES, ARTHUR W
BLEUER, ALICE
BLUE SHIELD FLORIDA
BOGGS, MAXNE
BRACKETT, DANNY
BAKER, DAWN
BERNAN ESSENTIAL REFERENCES
BELLSOUTH
BEAZER HOMES CORP
B URDEN, WILLIE J
B LUE SHIELD NASCO
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
CHANDLER EOUI°MENT CO, INC
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
CONTRACT SERVICE
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
O 320405 COLLINS & AIKMAN
O 320406 CALL ONE, INC
O 320407 CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP
O 320408 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
O 320409 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
O 320410 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
O 320411 CENTRAL FLORIDA GENEALOGICAL
O 320412 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
O 320413 COLUMBIA PROPANE
O 320414 CHARLIE'S LAWN MAINTENANCE INC
O 320415 CITGO PETROLEUM CORP
O 320416 CONSECO HEALTH INSURANCE CO
O 320417 CARLSON, GAY
O 320418 COMMERCIAL TITLE SERVICE,INC
O 320419 DEEP SIX DIVE & WATERSPORTS
April 9, 2002
6
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
CHECK
AMOUNT
500.00
52.57
810.29
62.00
60.00
490.00
5,329.70
68.90
213,108.83
5,060.75
3,281.46
1,660.00
587.09
18.17
54.59
462.00
267.50
210.00
3,396.28
275.82
275.55
66.12
890.98
297.50
30.90
51.57
10.82
52.22
179.30
343.43
500.00
20.00
200.00
43.26
1,000.00
60.00
51.58
14,878.94
413.91
13,806.65
320.00
1,000.00
99.00
9,165.72
115,940.65
25.00
823.90
13.00
513.00
6,323.99
42.50
221.64
30.95
3,953.70
3,253.46
52.90
100.00
3,749.08
6,760.00
•
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0320420
O 320421
O 320422
O 320423
O 320424
0320425
O 320426
O 320427
0320428
O 320429
O 320430
O 320431
O 320432
O 320433
O 320434
0320435
O 320436
O 320437
O 320438
O 320439
O 320440
O 320441
O 320442
O 320443
0320444
O 320445
O 320446
0320447
O 320448
0320449
O 320450
O 320451
0320452
O 320453
O 320454
O 320455
O 320456
O 320457
O 320458
O 320459
O 320460
O 320461
O 320462
O 320463
O 320464
O 320465
O 320466
O 320467
O 320468
O 320469
O 320470
O 320471
O 320472
O 320473
O 320474
O 320475
O 320476
April 9, 2002
NAME
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
DOW, HOWELL, GILMORE,
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DANIEL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR
D ESIGNED TRAFFIC
D ETKO, CATHY
D IGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC
D ILLON, GARY
D ISABATO, ANTHONY
D UNNINGTON, GALE
D EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
E G P, INC
E LLIS K PHELPS AND CO, INC
E BSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
ELPEX, INC
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONSULTANTS
EGGLESTON, WILLIAM
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL
EVERGLADES FARM
FEDEX
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
F W P C
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
S 2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
WILDLIFE COMMISSION
POWER & LIGHT
TIRE RECYCLING, INC
DETROIT_ DIESEL -ALLISON
0 A
FT PIERCE, CITY OF
FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE
FLORIDA DATABASE SYSTEMS, INC
FIRSTLAB
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
FREE SPIRIT PUBLISHING
FLOWSERVE US INC
FRANCIS, JOAN
GALE GROUP, THE
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
GENERAL GMC, TRUCK
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT INC
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
GREENE, ROBERT E
GARBER BUICK PONTIAC GMC TRUCK
GREGORY HARRIS, PHD, CVE
GIFFORD, ALICE
GRAUL, STEVE
GOODTIME GETAWAYS, INC
H W WILSON CO
H ICKMAN'S BRAKE & ALIGNMENT
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
HACH COMPANY
HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER
7
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,469.97
:48.06
8,732.49
8,337.96
3,664.16
1,043.88
1,039.94
150.00
326.25
78.25
100.00
48.96
25.00
36.00
39.67
160.65
1,839.05
883.68
2,811.52
960.00
143.00
52.90
1,791.39
101.01
173.25
13,759.49
25.00
1,542.00
964.80
2,495.63
195.00
2,387.88
83.00
4,700.00
763.00
1,782.49
37.00
17.06
7,652.71
18.00
510.54
623.24
1,570.75
101.60
41.00
1,976.56
15,071.00
',014.10
43.17
93.00
500.00
153.00
4,592.36
9,720.00
501.95
292.65
66.00
CHECK
NUMBER
0320477
O 320478
O 320479
O 320480
O 320481
O 320482
O 320483
NAME
HARRIS COTHERMAN & ASSOCIATES
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
HAMRICKS
HORTENSE & MILLS FUNERAL HOME
HANOVER INSURANCE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
O 320484 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 320485 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
O 320486 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC
O 320487 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
O 320488 INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER
O 320489 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
O 320490 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
O 320491 INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL
O 320492 IDEALIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
O 320493 JIM WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION
O 320494 J & A HANDY -CRAFTS, INC
O 320495 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
O 320496 JONES, ELVIN JR
O 320497 KELLY TRACTOR CO
O 320498 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
O 320499 KOUNS, DARLENE
O 320500 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING
O 320501 KREBS, JILL A
O 320502 KOSSACK, CARL
O 320503 KAFER, CHRISTOPHER Jr JR
O 320504 KNOWLES, CYRIL
O 320505 KELLER, JENAE
O 320506 KUESTERSTEFFEN, MIKE
O 320507 KEMIRON INC
O 320508 KIRBY VETERINARY HOSPITAL
O 320509 KATZMAN MD., SCOTT
O 320510 KAY, EDWARD
.0320511 KEYMEL MARJORIE
O 320512 KAPPA, JORGE
O 320513 INDIAN RIVER CHARTER
O 320514 LESCO, INC
O 320515 LEAHY INCORPORATED
O 320516 LYONS, THOMAS W
O 320517 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
O 320518 L B.SMITH, INC
O 320519 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
O 320520 LABOR FINDERS
O 320521 LESCO, INC
O 320522 LAPSCO INC
O 320523 LOWE'S COMPANIES,INC
O 320524 LOWE'S
O 320525 LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
O 320526 LUNA, JUVENAL
O 320527 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION
O 320528 L L S DEVELOPMENT
O 320529 LIVINGS, W MIKE
O 320530 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY
O 320531 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
O 320532 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
April 9, 2002
8
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
CHECK
AMOUNT
13,000.00
3,500.00
72.00
1,600.00
77.50
62,082.16
23,909.12
150.00
879.90
325.92
239.55
275.00
1,300.00
3,426.35
555.00
50.93
15,200.00
222.59
10.35
113.30
604.53
1,149.73
103.00
575.00
4.50
395.00
42.95
1,039.84
20.60
195.00
1,111.92
64.00
800.00
49.96
10.82
98.72
80.00
64.40
2,355.90
500.00
298.74
41.12
448.96
1,240.65
954.00
403.00
185.07
129.37
390.00
287.00
1,000.00
500.00
133.90
1,808.52
38.43
19,100.16
•
CHECK
NUMBER
O 320533
O 320534
O 320535
O 320536
O 320537
O 320538
O 320539
O 320540
O 320541
O 320542
O 320543
O 320544
O 320545
O 320546
O 320547
O 320548
O 320549
O 320550
O 320551
O 320552
O 320553
O 320554
O 320555
O 320556
O 320557
O 320558
O 320559
O 320560
O 320561
O 320562
O 320563
O 320564
O 320565
O 320566
O 320567
O 320568
O 320569
O 320570
O 320571
O 320572
O 320573
O 320574
O 320575
O 320576
O 320577
O 320578
O 320579
O 320580
O 320581
O 320582
O 320583
O 320584
O 320585
O 320586
O 320587
O 320588
O 320589
O 320590
April 9, 2002
NAME
MIKES GARAGE
MUMFORD LIBRARY BOOKS, INC
MUNICIPAL EOUIPM.ENT CO
MARTIN, PATRICIA
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
M G B CONSTRUCTION
MICROMARKETING, LLC
MEDCHECK
MAYR, SHARON
MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
MAYO CLINIC
MARKETING THAT WORKS INC
MARRONE, JOSEPH
MEDICARE PART B
MITCHELL TRAINING, INC
MARK MCINTOSH CONST INC
MILES, GENE
MATHERNE CONSTRUCTION
MUNNINGS, WANDA
MEDICAID AMBULANCE
MGM CONTRACTING INC
MACK, JANE N
MORIN, LORI
MCCLAINE, CLAUDIA
MCCREARY,WT
MARKHAM, DORIS
MEDICARE PART B SECONDARY
MILLER, DANIEL
MYLLYKOSKI, LEO
MINSKY, HELEN
MARTINEZ, WILLIAM
NATIONAL INSTITJTE FOR
NOLTE, DAVID C
N ICOSIA, ROGER J DO
N ICHOLS, RON
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
NEAL-SCHUMAN PUBLISHERS, INC
NATIONAL UNDERWRITER COMPANY
N E C BUSINESS NETWORK
NATIONSRENT
NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER LEARNING
NEACH, DONALD
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
ORIENTAL MERCHANDISE CO
0 BRISKY - BOOKS
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO
OLSON, ERIK
OGONOSKI,
O FFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENER?L
O 'HAIRE, OUINN, CANDLER, AND
PETTY CASH
PORT CONSOLIDATED
PETERSEN INDUSTRIES, INC
PEGASUS TRAVEL
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES, INC
P UBLIX PHARMACY #0642
JENNIFER
9
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
CHECK
AMOUNT
70.00
16,832.04
693.00
1,200.00
28.56
876.78
36.67
250.73
105.72
450.00
2,000.00
1,600.00
5,000.00
73.00
433.81
200.00
1,500.00
247.00
500.00
39.00
52.22
5,200.00
30.00
98.60
75.10
250.00
26.87
43.27
53.31
380.00
51.91
307.46
90.00
210,665.92
1,500.00
93.00
531.48
51.10
94.00
3,361.92
24.90
5,250.00
20.00
2,502.81
567.00
44.50
1,092.33
4,477.50
115.72
500.00
13.35
31,108.50
100.00
15,972.47
773.03
277.00
1,000.00
165.85
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
O 320591 PARK, LYNN
O 320592 PERSONNEL PLUS INC
O 320593 PROFORMA
O 320594 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING SVC
O 320595 PESHA, JESSICA
O 320596 PER -SE TECHNOLOGIES-PHYS SVCS
O 320597 PARALEE COMPANY INC
O 320598 PIONEER LIFE INSURANC
O 320599 PAGE, KALIBBIA
O 320600 PATTOK, BERNIDINE
O 320601 PEBTF
O 320602 PAYNE, HARVEY SR
O 320603 PARENT, PAUL X
O 320604 QUINLAN PUBLISHING GROUP
O 320605 RINKER MATERIALS
O 320606 ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION
O 320607 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC
O 320608 ROSEWOOD COURT DEVELOPMNT CORP
O 320609 RIORDAN, MICHAEL C PSY.D.
O 320610 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
O 320611 RANGELINE TAPPING SERVICE INC
O 320612 RELIABLE POLY JOHN SERVICES
O 320613 RCL DEVELOPMENT
O 320614 REXEL CONSOLICATED
O 320615 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
O 320616 REAM, CHARLES R
O 320617 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
O 320618 ROSEMEYER, DOROTHY
O 320619 ROBBINS, ORRIN
O 320620 SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
O 320621 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
O 320622 SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE
O 320623 SOUTHARD, TERRY
O 320624 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
O 320625 STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE
.0320626 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
O 320627 SLADE, KEVIN
O 320628 SHADY OAK ANIMAL CLINIC
O 320629 SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
O 320630 SMITH BROS CONT EQUIP
O 320631 STAMM MANUFACTURING
O 320632 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
O 320633 STAGE & SCREEN
O 320634 SMITH, JEAN
O 320635 SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
O 320636 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY
O 320637 SAINT-HILAIRE, VIE
O 320638 STATE FARM AUTO
O 320639 STERICYCLE INC
O 320640 STEPHENS, LARRY
O 320641 SCHUSTER, GEORGE
0320642 SCOGGINS, GWENDOLYN
O 320643 SCS INTERACTIVE INC
O 320644 SHERRILL, CHARLES A
O 320645 TARMAC AMERICA INC
O 320646 TEN -8 FIRE EOUIPMENT, INC
O 320647 TEAM EOUIPMENT, INC
O 320648 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN
April 9, 2002
10
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
CHECK
AMOUNT
490.15
570.00
59.85
179.77
29.61
16,682.17
1,880.36
25.70
38.63
17.61
50.61
72.35
500.00
135.60
31.64
500.00
2,369.67
30,413.18
1,387.50
19.85
350.00
386.18
500.00
200.58
1,408.14
150.00
2,395.09
51.26
395.00
7,000.00
5.79
4,964.16
57.15
472.16
11,393.12
20.85
160.86
34.99
668.88
425.54
588.00
891.96
61.38
60.00
78.00
28.18
33.76
207.95
241.43
154.00
10.38
51.25
2,825.00
32.50
2,629.28
2,710.88
202.76
120.00
• •
CHECK
NUMBER
O 320649
O 320650
O 320651
O 320652
O 320653
O 320654
O 320655
O 320656
O 320657
O 320658
O 320659
NAME
TREASURE COAST BUILDERS
TRANSIT AIR CONDITIONING
S CRIPPS TREASURE COAST
THOMPSON, WANDA C.
TRICARE REGION E
TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC
THORRY, ANDREW
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA CTQP
U S WIRE -TIE SYSTEMS
UNITED BUSINESS SYSTEMS
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
O 320660 UNITED PEALTHCARE
O 320661 UNITED HEALTH CARE
O 320662 VELDE FORD, INC
O 320663 VERO BEACH, CITY OF
O 320664 VERO BEACH, CITY OF
O 320665 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
O 320666 VORTECH PHARMACEUTICALS
O 320667 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
O 320668 VERO BEAR:NG & BOLT
O 320669 VICKERS, DAVID SCOTT
O 320670 VERO BEACH MAGAZINE
O 320671 VERO BEACH WOMAN'S CLUB, INC
O 320672 WAL-MART PHARMACY INC
O 320673 WILLHOFF, PATSY
O 320674 WAUSAU
O 320675 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
O 320676 WAL-MART STORES, INC
O 320677 WURTH USA SOUTHEAST INC
0320673 WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
O 320679 WALKER, KEITH
O 320680 WORKING FIRE
O 320681 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE
O 320682 WELLER POOL CONSTRUCTORS INC
O 320683 WHITTEN, SUSAN
O 320684 ZUGELTER CONSTRUCTION
O 320685 ZEDEK, KELLY
O 320686 MC NEAL, PARTICK
O 320687 MILLER, JOSEPH
O 320688 WODTKE, RUSSELL
O 320689 RUDD, ALAN
O 320690 LICARI, LINDA
O 320691 ROYAL, THOMAS
O 320692 GERRY, RAYMOND
O 320693 GELD, TONIA
April 9, 2002
11
CHECK
DATE
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-C3-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
2002-03-27
CHECK
AMOUNT
500.00
154.87
257.84
500.00
363.05
1,646.03
135.00
375.00
618.80
53,431.00
7,323.24
341.51
129.04
100.00
3,246.33
9,462.50
204.11
126.31
75.00
32.69
10.25
84.00
910.00
52.46
130.00
202.40
1,081.00
121.40
180.93
1,877.21
45.00
310.00
1,161.87
246,712.62
43.17
500.00
55.50
299.74
665.44
295.97
202.12
440.86
641.26
391.88
444.00
1,588,438.56
nu
1
7. C. John's Island Water Management, Inc. - Use of Well Located in
the Old Winter Beach Road Right -of -Way (SJRWMD)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 30, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
T, EAD CONCURRENC
K ating, AICP
Community Development Director
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: March 30, 2002
RE: Board Authorization for John's Island Water Management, Inc. to Continue
Using a Well Located in the Old Winter Beach Road Right -of -Way
It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following inforntation at the
Board's meeting of April 9, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Last July, staff reported to the Board that John's Island Water Management, Jnc. (JIW1.1), a subsidiary of the
John's Island Property Owner's Association (POA), has an irrigation well located in the right-of-way of Old
Winter Beach Road south of Jungle Trail (see Attachment 1). In 1990, the Town of Indian River Shores
granted JIWM a "non -potable water franchise" to use the well (see Attachment 3). In turn, the St. Johns River
Water Management District (SJRWMD) issued a consumptive use permit to JIWM in 1990, authorizing JIWM
to use the well.
Last year, the SJRWMD, in learning that the well is located in County right-of-way, requested that the County
formally authorize JIWM to continue its use of the well. At the Boards July 3, 2001 meeting, staff
recommended that the Board approve JIWM's continued use of the well. However. the Board withheld its
decision on whether or not to allow the well pending more information as to JIWM's opportunity to use, as
an alternative, reclaimed "gray" water from the City of Vero Beach (see 7 3/01 Board meeting minutes,
Attachment 2).
Staff has obtained more information on JIWM's opportunity to use altemati-,e reclaimed water and is now
reporting back to the Board for further consideration of the matter.
April 9, 2002
12
•
ANALFSIS
James Holier. Ltilities Manager for the Johns Island POA, has advised staff that the well in the Old Winter
Beach Road right-of-way is a `backup" well for imgation. Mr. Moller indicated that the POA primarily buys
and uses reclaimed water from the City, but at certain times of the year (i.e., in the summer) tzere is not enough
reuse water available, and the POA must rely on the well during those times. Mr. Moller explained that the
reuse water is of higher quality for irrigation than the back-up well and therefore use of the well, although
necessary during shortfalls of reclaimed water availability, is not preferred, compared to reclaimed City water.
Since the referenced well is not a principal irrigation source for TIV , staffs position is L at the Board should
authorize JIWM to continue to use the Old Winter Beach Road well.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to notify the SJRWMT) that JIWM
is authorized to continue its use of the subject well in the Old Winter Beach Road right-of-way, with the
following condition:
• That JIWM use the well only as a backup source for irrigation when reclaimed water is unavailable.
ATTACHMENTS
Survey of Old Winter Beach Road showing well location
Excerpt of 7/3/01 BCC nunutes
Town of Indian River Shores Ordinance No. 385, granting JIWtM an irrigation water franchise
April 9, 2002
13
Ol
1'o
•
, j CYOK FO rre Y3+.¢x PIO
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized staff
to notify the St. Johns River Water Management District that
John's Island Water Management, Inc. is authorized to continue
its use of the subject well in the Old Winter Beach Road right-
of-way, with the condition that JIWM use the well only as a
backup source for irrigation when reclaimed water is
unavailable, as recommended in the memorandum.
7.D. Florida Communities Trust (FCT) - Conceptual Approval
Agreement and Confidentiality Agreementfor Cost -Share Acquisition
of the Hallstrom Farmstead
The Board reviewed a memorandum of March 27, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
IENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
obert M. eating, AICP
Community Development Directir
FROM: Roland M. DeBIoi AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE:March 2?. 2002
RE:
Approval of Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Conceptual Approval Agreement and
Confidentiality Agreement for Cost -Share Acquisition of the Hallstrom Farmstead
It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners foiittally consider the following info uuation at the
Board's regular meeting of April 9, 2002.
April 9, 2002
15
nil
•
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
In November 2001, Indian River County, in coordination with the Indian River County Historical Society,
was awarded a Florida Communities Trust (FCT) .15% cost -share grant for purchase of the Hallstrom
Farmstead project on south Old Dixie Highway (see attached map). The —90 acre project was initially
approved for "contingency funding," meaning that it would only be funded by the FCT if money became
available due to adjusted funding needs of higher ranked projects. Recently, county staff was advised by the
FCT that funding has in fact become available, and the Hallstrom Farmstead is now officially eligible for
funding.
Since November. FCT staff has visited the Hallstrom project site with county staff to verify site conditions
as represented in the project application. The County is also in the process of obtaining two independent
appraisals of the property. In accordance with State procedures, the next step is for the FCT Governing Body
and the County to execute a "Conceptual Approval Agreement" (CAA) for the cost -share funding project.
In accordance with FCT procedures, the County is also required to execute a Confidentiality Agreement,
identifying individuals who will be privy to appraisal infouiiation and obligated to maintain confidentiality
prior to the sellers' execution of purchase option agreements. Attached is the CAA and Confidentiality
Agreement for the Board's approval consideration.
ANALYSIS
• Conceptual Approval Agreement
the CAA consists of standard Language and conditions pursuant to Rule 9K-4. Florida Administrative Code,
which is the rule that sets forth FCT program procedures.
The Agreement consists of ten main sections, as follows:
I. General Conditions
II. Audit Requirements
III. Requirements that Must be Met Prior to Initiation of Project Site Negotiation
IV. Management Plan Approval
V. Project Plan Approval
VI. Project Site Acquisition Requirements Imposed by Chapter 259 and Chapter
330, Part III, F.S.
VII. Obligations of the FCT Recipient as a Condition of Project Funding
VIII. Obligations of the Recipient Relating to the Use of Bond Proceeds
IX. Disallowable Activities/Remedies
X. Conditions Particular to the Project Site Plan that Must be Addressed in the
Management Plan
The General Conditions section of the agreement contains standard language pertaining to timing and
coordination of steps between the County and FCT, and among other things identifies the key contact from
the County for purposes of coordinating project activities.
The Audit Requirements section specifies audit requirements under Section 215.97, F.S., the Florida Single
Audit Act.
Requirements that Must be Met Prior to Initiation of Project Site Negotiation: this section identifies the
representative of the County authorized to execute documents associated with the project. (Consistent with
past FCT projects, the Board Chairman is proposed as the County's representative, subject to full Board
authorization). Additionally, this section identifies the County's acquisition agent (FloridAffinity, Inc.) and
also specifies FCT acquisition and negotiation procedures, identifying infoiniation that the County is
April 9, 2002
16
n urn
rt
• •
obligated to provide to the FCT relating to acquisition (i.e.. title reports, appraisals, purchase agreement). This
section provides that a Confidentiality Agreement (attached) must be executed prior to purchase negotiations.
The Management Plan Approval section outlines required elements of a conceptual management plan that
must be completed prior to closing.
Project Plan Approval outlines County documents required prior to ECF disbursement of State funds,
including a statement of total project costs, a siurned agreement for acquisition, a certified survey, title
insurance and an environmental assessment
•
Project Site Acquisition Requirements Imposed
specifies that the local recipient (the County) will
reversionary interest. A Grant Award Agreement, wh
to be recorded upon closing.
by Chapter 259 and Chapter 380, Part 1II, F.S.
have title to the project. and that State will have a
ch spells out conditions of the grant award. is required
Obligations of the FCT Recipient as a Condition of Project Funding ensures that any use of project
property once acquired will be consistent with the adopted management pian. or. if changes are proposed,
that F( I' approval is first obtained.
Obligations of the Recipient Relating to the Use of Bond Proceeds requires the County to notify FCT if
any use of project property is proposed that may affect State bond proceeds used in acquiring the property,
with respect to legal and tax consequences. This section also outlines disallowable activities. "Disallowable
activities" are specifically listed and include the operation of concessions on the property, and "any use of
the project site by any person other than in such person's capacity as a member of the general public".
Disallowable Activities/Remedies provides that the County will cease any disallowable activities on the
project property upon written notification from the FCT, as applicable, and that the FCT will be held harmless
from all claims relating to disallowable activities. This section also provides that the FC 1 has the nght to seek
an injunction against the County for any disallowable activities.
Conditions Particular to the Project Site Plan that Must be Addressed in the Management Plan
reflects information presented to FCT in the grant application, including revisions deemed appropriate by the
FCT, relating to proposed site improvements and use.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Conceptual Approval
Agreement and Confidentiality Agreement for the Hallstrom Fai instead project, and authorize the Board
Chairman to sign the Agreements.
ATTACHMENT
1. Map o1 the Hallstrom Fat instead project.
Z. Conceptual Approval Agreement.
3. Confidentiality Agreement.
April 9, 2002
17
D4 i
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, ShCONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
Conceptual Approval Agreement and Confidentiality
Agreement with Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for the
Hallstrom Farmstead project, and authorized the Chairman to
execute same, as recommended in the memorandum.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.E. Revised Interlocal Agreement - Florida Department of
Transportation, City of Vero Beach, City of Sebastian, City of
Fellsmere, Town of Indian River Shores, Town of Orchid, School
District of Indian River County - Creation of the Indian River County
Metropolitan Planning Organization - (Two Additional Voting
Members)
The Board reviewed a memorandum of March 9, 2002:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Robert M. Keating, AICP /LA/1 K
Community Development Director
March 9, 2002
SUBJECT: Appro,a1 of Interlocal Agreement for the Creation of the
Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization
It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meetinL of April 9, 2002.
April 9, 2002
18
rt/
[r°ii
•
DESCRIPTION AM) CONDITIONS:
When the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) was formed in 1993,
an apportionment plan was developed to establisn the structure and representation of the MPO Policy
Board. The MPOs 1993 (original) apportionment plan provided voting representation for the
County, Vero Beach, Sebastian. Fellsmere, and Indian River Shores. In addition, the plan provided
for the Indian River County School District (IRCSD), the Town of Orchid, and the Florida
Department of Transportation, District Four. to he nonvoting MPO members.
Recently, the City of Sebastian requested additional voting membership on the MPO Board to reflect
the City's growth since 1993. After analysis of this request and consideration of applicable state
and FDOT regulations, MPO staff prepared a 2000 apportionment plan which was approved by the
MPO at its January 10. 2001 meeting. The 2000 plan (attached) differs from the 1993 plan by the
addition of two additional voting members to the MPO Board. One of these is from the City of
Sebastian. while the other is from the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners.
Since the MPO's approval of the 2000 apportionment plan, the following activities have occurred:
•
•
•
•
Consistent with state statutes. a copy of the adopted apportionment plan was sent to each of
the MPO member jurisuictions with a request [hat each accept or reject the NIPO's proposed
2000 apportionment plan.
Acceptance resolutions were adopted by the County, the Cities of Vero Beach. Sebastian and
Fellsmere, and the Towns of Orchid and Indian River Shores.
A copy of the MPO s 2000 apportionment plan and the acceptance resolutions were sent to
the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) and the Governor's office.
In November, 2001, the Governor's office approved the MPO's 2000 apportionment plan.
In February, 2002. FDOT approved a revised Interlocal Agreement - the document which
must be executed by all local governments within [he MPO area in order for the
Apportionment Plan changes to be put in effect.
ANALYSIS:
To finalize the process of adding an additional voting member from the City of Sebastian and an
additional voting member from Indian River County each of the MPO member jurisdictions must
now execute a revised INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR CREATION OF THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. To implement the new
apportionment plan and idd an additional voting member from the City of Sebastian and an
additional voting member from Indian River County, the revised agreement must be approved in the
same manner as the original agreement.
A copy of the revised agreement is attached to this staff report. This agreement, between FOOT rnd
each of the MPO member jurisdictions, is essentially the same document that formally established
the MPO in 1993. The only substantive change from the 1993 agreement is the addition of the
additional voting members to the MPO. In order to implement the 2000 MPO Apportionment Plan,
staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Interlocal Agreemcnt.
April 9, 2002
19
0!!
Lk i
J
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Interlocal Agreement for
creation of the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization and authorize the Chairman
to execute the azreement.
Attachment: Interlocal Agreement for Creation of the
Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
Revised Interlocal Agreement for creation of the Indian River
County Metropolitan Planning Organization and authorized the
Chairman to execute
Memorandum.
same, as recommended
COPY OFF-PARTI-ALLY-EXECUTED•AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
in the
7. F. Bid #4049 - Furnish and Install Galvanized Fence at North
Sebastian Conservation Area and Flinn Tract Conservation Area
(Parks Division)
The Board reviewed a memorandum of April 1, 2002:
DATE: April 1, 2002
TO: BOARD OF COLITY COMMISSIONFRS
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services, Director .
April 9, 2002
20
270
• •
FROM: Fran Powell. Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT:
IRC Bid # 4049 Furnish and install galvanized fence at two (2) IRC
conservation areas
Public Works Department / Parks Division
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department / Parks Division has requested the installation of galvanized fence
at the North Sebastian Conservation Area and at the Flinn Tract Conservation Area. The bid
results are as follows:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dares:
DernandStar Broadcast to:
Specification s requested by:
Replies:
BID TABULATION:
March 20, 2002
March 1 and 8, 2002
Two Hundred Forty Five (245) vendors
Twelve (12) vendors
Three (3) vendors
ESTFVIATED BUI )GET:
522,000.00
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BLD: $19,141.40
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 125-146-539-038.13
Land Acquisition Other Contractual
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Optimum Services. Inc. as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
Commissioner Adams understood and wished to clarify that the North Sebastian
portion of this fence bid involved the Kirrie property.
April 9, 2002
21
Vendor
Fence for North
Sebastian
Fence for
1 Total Bid
Amount
Flinn Tract
Optimum Services Inc
514,797 20
54,344.20
S19,141.40
Okeechobee, FL
Kevin's Fence Inc
$18,824.00
36,136.00
324,960.00
Sanford, FL
Honda Sunrise Homes Inc
20.707.50
$8,000.00
528707.50
Melbourne, FL
ESTFVIATED BUI )GET:
522,000.00
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BLD: $19,141.40
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 125-146-539-038.13
Land Acquisition Other Contractual
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Optimum Services. Inc. as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
Commissioner Adams understood and wished to clarify that the North Sebastian
portion of this fence bid involved the Kirrie property.
April 9, 2002
21
Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief Roland DeBlois specified that
environmental planning has been coordinating with the Parks Division to make sure that
there is no conflict with that issue until it is resolved. Primarily the eastern boundary, along
the railroad tracks and other problem areas are going to be fenced. Staff is waiting for a
resolution of the problem before doing the 130`'' Avenue portion.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#4049 to Optimum Services, Inc., for a total in the amount of
S 19,141.40, as the lowest most responsive and responsible
bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to
Bid, as recommended in the memorandum.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO TLIE BOARD
WHEN RECEIVED
7. G. Resolution No. 2002-019- Traffic Control Device Ledger
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 19, 2002:
TO:
THROUGH
FRONT:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
Christopher R. Mora, P.E.
County Traffic Engineer
Traffic Control Device Ledger
March 19, 2001.. CONSENT AGENDA
April 9, 2002
22
• •
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Public Works Director is to provide a Traffic Control Device Ledger update every six months,
for ratification by the Board of County Commissioners as specified in Section 312.18 of the Indian
River County Code. The last ledger update was completed and approved by the Board in October.
2001.
RECOMMENDATIONS & FUNDING
It is recommended that this ledger update be approved. There is no funding impact generated by this
action.
ATTACHMENT
Draft Resolution and Ledger Documents
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2002- 019 approving the traffic control devices
authorized by the Director of Public Works.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-019
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES AUTHORIZED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has directed the Director of Public
Works to maintain a ledger listing the traffic control devices in the unincorporated area of
the County (Section 312.18, Indian River County Code); and
WHEREAS, the code requires this ledger to be presented to the Board of County
Commissioners for approval; and
WHEREAS, the ledger has been presented and is attached as Exhibit "A" to this
Resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT:
April 9, 2002
23
flu
Cit
The Board of County Commissioners hereby accepts and approves the traffic control
device ledger which is Exhibit "A" to this resolution.
The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner
motion was seconded by Commissioner
vote was as follows:
Adams
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Aye
Ave
Aye
Aye
Ginn
and the
, and, upon being put to a vote, the
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 9th day of Apri
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
By,Bice.
Deputy Clerk
, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By ;-� t /17-
Ruth M. Stanbridge
Chairman
EXHIBIT "A' IS ON FILE WITH THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO DIE BOARD
7.H. Renewal of Commercial Lease Agreement at the Vero Beach
Municipal Airport - Informational Item from Sheriff Roy Raymond
The Board reviewed letters of February 19 and February 21, 2002:
April 9, 2002
24
•
ijcrtU
ROY RAYMOND • LIVD/7 `� n;VER CCU `in/
MCGOCr r'.Jn,C I ICMrr iA".;
NIrNIL-I Ui HAT,JE.o. ..uF) ..;;fir_ A .UN
;p'„ 41st AVENUE
February. i9, 2002
VERO BEACH. FLO?IDA'22463-18tH
City of Vero Beach
Municipal Airport
P.O. Box I3S9
Vero Beach. Florida =2961-I3Sv
Re: Renewal or -Commercial Lease Agreement
Located at the Vero Beach Municipal Airport.
Dear Sir:
PHONE (tiff 1) Sb'3-n7OC
As you know. Indian River County, as Tenant and the City of Vero Beach, as La:.dlord,
entered into a Commcrcial Lcasc Atrccrncnt dated March 19, 1997, for land and building
space Located at :he Vero Beach Municipal Airport for the use or the incian Riser County
Sheriff's Off -ice ("Lease")
On behalf of Indian River County,
desired that the Lease be renewed
with paragraph 2 (b) of t`:e Lease.
as Tenant, under the Lease, p'Hease be adviser' that It is
for an additional term of five (5) years in accordance
Thank you for you, attention in this matter.
Sincerely,
Roy Raymond, Sheriff
RR::nes,
Nt..Auher
hhc :'_'rd Intcrnation:ath ,\LcrcdIicd Law I.nl ,rcvtnenc,\Ucncy
Accredited by [he ('nmmi Yaos1 on \CCrC1IiUtiini ter 1.aW Enl'orcculcnl \eencm�
April 9, 2002
25
nen t-por a ed
C!i
•
sheriff
ROY
RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PLOIIIv..
HAI I.)IAA I it l*.urr.1 A' I; AIIUOi
W55 41:j1 AVENUE
February 21, 2002
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32000-1808
Mr. Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator
Indian River County
1840 2.5'I' Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365
Re: Renewal of Commercial Lease Agreement
Located at the Vero Beach Municipal Airport
Dear Mr. Baird:
"NONE (561) 560-6700
Attached please find my letter to the City of Vero Beach expressing our desire that our lease at
the Municipal Airport be renewed far an additional tern of five years. I am forwarding this to
you as an informational item for the Board of County Commissioners.
Sincerely
Roy Raymond, Sheriff
RR:mej
Attachments
cc: M. Asher
The l7Jrd Internutlonall% Accrediteit Law 1•:nfortemen( .\gencv
\circ cited by the LVnlrhs,.91on on:\ccrcditation for Law l nfnrtcment ,\1encic. Incorporated
NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED
April 9, 2002
A COPY OF TFIE COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT
APPROVED MARCH 19, 1997, IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
26
• •
7.1. Environmental Learning Center - Landfill Assessments on
Leased Property Payment Schedule
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 28, 2002:
To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
Through: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
From. Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager /r
Date: March 28, 2002
Subject: Environmental Learning Center - Landfill Assessments on Leased Property
Descriptions & Conditions
The Environmental Learning Center (ELC) leases a fifty-one (51) acre parcel located on Wabasso
Island from Indian River County for a nominal fee of $1.00 per year. In accordance with the lease
agreement, the ELC has the responsibility of paying the annual landfill assessment on tie property.
The County has paid this assessment for the last several years, but has not invoiced the
Environmental Learning Center for this amount in accordance with the lease agreement. As a result,
four (4) years of landfill assessments are now due from the ELC totaling $2 918.90. On December
11, 2001, staff sent a letter notifying the ELC of this issue. The ELC has proposed a payment
schedule of $500.00 per year until this back payment is paid in full.
Staff has no objection to the proposed payment schedule. The Environmental Learning Center
operates under a tight budget. The Executive Director has indicated that an unexpected expenditure
of this amount is difficult to manage within the current budget. In order to alleviate any financial
burden placed on the ELC, staff recommends approval of the proposed payment schedule. Under
this schedule, the ELC will pay $500.00 per year until the $2,918.90 is paid in full. ELC is obligated to
pay ail future landfill assessments when due, as provided in the lease agreement.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the payment schedule as
presented above. Under this schedule, the Environmental Learning Center will pay the County
$500.00 per year until the entire balance of $2,918.90 is paid in full. Additionally, the ELC is obligated
to pay all future landfill assessments when due, as provided in the lease agreement.
Attachments
Letter from ELC, dated March 26, 2002
Letter from IRC, dated December 11, 2002
April 9, 2002
27
c� r
x7 7
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
payment schedule as presented, that is: the ELC will pay the
County 5500.00 per year until the entire balance of S2,918.90
is paid in full, as recommended in the memorandum. The ELC
is obligated to pay all future landfill assessments when due, as
provided in the lease agreement.
7.J. Request for Proposals for ADA Study Update Authorization to
Issue
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 3, 2002:
Date: April 3, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County. Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director aild-I/A)
Subject: Authorization Issue Request for Proposals for ADA Study Update
BACKGROUND:
In recent months, the County has been is discussions with representatives of Treasure Coast
Wheelchair Group and their legal representatives relative to the County's compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (AD -V)
In 1992, the County prepared a transition plan and the adopted a self-evaluation plan in 1993.
All the work performed on these plans were all done in-house and a significant amount of
improvements were made on County Facilities based on these plans.
With the passage of time some updating may need to be done. More specifically, an independent
evaluation may be more supportable by the members of the community with specific disabilities
if an independent person or group performed that analysis
Currently, there are funds that have accrued for addressing ADA issues and improvements. It is
probably in the County's best interest that an up -date be done by independent sources.
April 9, 2002
28
• •
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the General Services Department be authorized to solicit services of an
ADA consultant to update the County's ADA plans through the issuance of a Request for
Proposals.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized the
General Services Department to solicit services of an ADA
consultant to update the County's ADA Plans through the
issuance of a Request for Proposals, as recommended in the
memorandum.
7.K. Cal Builders Subdivision - Final Plat Approval Requested by Cal
Builders, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 25, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
/DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
U C! 717/
Community
��i�/
o6crt M. Keating, MCP�
Community Development Director
THROUGII: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Joan McCoy, AICP? ,\'17-1\_
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: March 25. 2002
SUBJECT: Cal Builder's Request for Final Plat Approval for Cal Builders
Subdivision
April 9, 2002
29
It is requested that the data herein presented by given formal consideration by the Board
of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 9. 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The Cal Builders subdivision is a 1 lot plat of 1 61 acres of commercially zoned land_
The subject site is located on the east side of Old Dixie Highway across from 1s` Avenue
S.E., and is zoned CH (Heavy Commercial). Platting is required under county subdivision
ordinance requirements to legalize and "make buildable" the 1.61 acre parcel. Once the
final plat is approved. the owner may proceed with development of the parcel.
On August 9, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat
approval for the Cal Builders subdivision. The developer, Cal Builders, Inc., is now
requesting final plat approval and has submitted a final plat in confoiniance with the
approved preliminary plat.
ySIS:
The entire subject parcel is to be developed through the site plan process. Site plan
approval was granted on August 9. 2001, subject to a condition that the owner obtain
final plat approval to legalize the parcel by conforming to county subdivision regulations.
Thus if the final plat is approved, the applicant may commence improvements on the site
in accordance with the approved site plan. All site improvements will be governed under
the site plan development and certificate of occupancy (C.O.) procedures. Therefore, no
contract for construction or warranty and maintenance agreement is required as part of
the final plat application/request. All applicable final plat requirements are satisfied for
final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for the Cal Builders final plat.
ATTACHMENT:
i. Application
2. Location Map
3. Plat Graphic
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously granted final plat
approval for the Cal Builders final plat, as recommended in the
memorandum.
April 9, 2002
30
• •
7.L. Sheriff Roy Raymond - U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of
Justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program - Request
for Grant Dollars
The Board reviewed a letter of April 01, 2002:
Sijerttf
ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMPEEI FLOPIOA SHERIPF. ASSOCIATSEN
'AEMBE9 OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS AOSOCIA`IQN
4055 41st AVENUE
April 01, 2002
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE
(56 56'9-6700
Honorable Ruh M. Stanbridge, Chairperson
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th ,Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Commissioner Stanbridge:
Indian River County and the Sheriff's Office have the oppc rtun_ity to request grant dollars
for the purchase of replacement bulletproof vests through the U.S. Departrncnt of jusvice,
Bureau 4 justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program_ The grant will
reimburse up to 50% of the total costs of approved body armor over a four year grant
funding period. Unlike many previous grants, the county can supplant local dollars and
providc required s ifety equipment for our law enforcement officers at a substantial savings
to die citizens of Iridian River Courts.
The manufacturers of bulletproof vests guarantee their product for a service life of five
years. Currently, the Sher ff's Office replaces one fifth (1/5) of the agencies vests annually
through We normal br dgct process. The Sheriff's Office has 190 positions for which
bulletproof vests are 'sst ed to its law errforccrncnt deputies at a net replacement coat of
$473.50 per vest for a total agency -wide replacement cost of $89,965. By the close of the
grant, the Indian River County tax -pavers could realize a potential savings of $44,982.50,
Again, I reiterate, these funds can be used to supplant local funds and the re rnhurscmcnt
would be paid directly to Indian River County for budgeted expenses incurred through the
normal ongoing replacement of bulletproof vests.
April 9, 2002
31
8 1
Attached, are documents and information required for completion of the online application
process. We request this item be placed on the agenda under Constitutional Officers for
the Board of County Commissioners meeting scheduled for April 9, 2002.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Lieutenant Kenneth Hamilton at 978-
6316 Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Roy Raymond, Sheriff
Indian River County
Illy ] n Tn
Attachments
cc: Fran Adams, Commissioner
Caroline Ginn, Commissioner
Ken Macht, Commissioner
John Z ippin, Commissioner
The 173rd Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies. Incorporated
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
completion of the online application process to obtain grant
dollars for the purchase of replacement bulletproof vests
through the U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice
Assistance Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program, as requested
in the letter.
April 9, 2002
32
9.A.1.
PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-017 -
AMENDMENT TO AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION REGULATIONS OF
LDR SECTIONS 911.06(4) AND 913.06(5) (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN [HE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of April 1, 2002 and
explained how the affidavit of exemption would affect properties whether in or out of the
urban service area.
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
r—/
Robert M. Keating,
Community Development Director
A_ /C.
FROM: Stan Bohm?, AICP
Planning Director
DATE: April 1, 2002
SUBJECT: Request to Amend the Affidavit of Exemption Regulations of LDR
Sections 911.06(4) and 913.06(5)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given foiuial consideration by the Board
of County Commissioners at its meeting of April 9, 2002.
BACKGROUND
Last summer and fall, county staff, the Professional Services Advisory Committee
(PSAC), the Planning_ and Zoning Commission (P7C), and the Board of County
Commissioners (Board) considered changes to the county's affidavit of exemption
regulations to allow affidavits of exemption on agriculturally designated lands (lands
located outside of the Urban Service Arca). Those proposed changes were initiated by
staff based upon comprehensive plan amendments that went into etfect in June 2001. At
that time. staff, the PSAC, and the PZC recommended that the Board approve those
proposed changes
On October 23. 2001, the Board considered those proposed changes, but agreed with
some concerns raised by Deputy County Attorney Will Collins. One of those concerns
April 9, 2002
33
•
related to the fact that the affidavit of exemption process allows for creation of parcels
that will not have paved road access. Another concern was that the affidavit of exemption
regulations allow staff -level approval of up to 49 parcels covering 245 or more acres
without formal infrastructure and without PZC or Board oversight. As a result of those
concerns the Board adopted LDR changes which do NOT allow affidavits of exemption
in agiiculturally designated areas (see attachment #1). Therefore. the current regulations
allow agriculturally designated lands to he divided through the agricultural planned
development (PD) process or the conventional subdivision process, but not through the
affida%it of exemption process.
After the October 23`d meeting, the Board decided to revisit the issue of affidavits of
exemption on agricultural lands, and directed staff to analyze the affidavit of exemption
process and report back to the Board with recommendations. Staff presented detailed
affidavit of exemption information and analysis to the Board at its January 22, 2002
meeting (see attachment #2), at which time the Board directed staff to initiate changes to
the affidavit of exemption regulations. Said changes are to allow affidavits of exemption
in agricultural areas, with some consideration of limiting the number of parcels created
through that process (see attachment #3).
As directed by the Board, staff has now drafted changes to the affidavit of exemption
regulations Those changes were reviewed by the PSAC at its February 21, 2002
meeting. At that meeting, the PSAC voted 5-0 to recommend that the Board adopt the
affidavit of exemption LDR amendment as proposed and recommended by staff (see
attachment #5). At its March 14, 2002 meeting the PZC voted 5-1 to recommend that
the Board adopt the proposed changes (see attachment #7).
The Board is now to consider the new proposed changes and is to adopt, adopt with
changes, or not adopt the proposed amendments.
ANALYSIS
For the reasons outlined in staff's January report to the Board (see attachment #2), staff's
position is that affidavits of exemption are appropriate on agriculturally designated lands,
given the county s current comprehensive plan policies and staffs experience with such
developments. That experience indicates that affidavit of exemption "projects", both
inside and outside the Urban Service Area, are small (1-11 parcels) and that the current
49 lot limit on the affidavit of exemption process far exceeds customary proposals.
Therefore, it appears that significantly reducing the current 49 parcel Emit to less than 20
parcels would have no effect on customary proposals. In fact, scaling back the limit
would ensure that larger projects are reviewed by the PZC and/or the Board (via the
agricultural PD or conventional subdivision process) and would ensure that
infrastructure improvements, such as paved roads which are not required via the affidavit
of exemption process, would be required and provided for such larger projects involving
20 or more parcels. Rased on this analysis, staff has structured the proposed ordinance
to set a 19 parcel limit on affidavits of exemption, whether located inside or outside the
Urban Service Area.
In staffs opinion. a 19 parcel limit is logical based upon the existing LDR threshold level
for paving requirements in agricultural areas (areas outside the Urban Service krea)
Those requirements are contained in LDR section 954.10(3) (see attachment 44). Under
section 954.10(3), projects that generate more than 200 average daily trips and are
located in agricultural areas must provide paved parking and driveway areas; projects
below that threshold are not required to provide paved improvements. The "more than
April 9, 2002
34
• •
200 daily trips" txreshold equates to 20 single family parcels. Therefore, applying the
954.10(3) paving exemption threshold to affidavits of exemption would limit the number
of affidavit of exemption parcels to less than 20. Ln the context of affidavits of
exemption, 20 or more parcels would cover 100 or more acres.
Rased on the 954.10(3) standard, staff has drafted an LDR amendment ordinance that
reduces the current affidavit of exemption threshold from "50 or more" parcels to "20 or
more" Parcels. As proposed, the LDR amendment ordinance (see attachment #8) also
contains the changes that were considered by the PZC last September. Thus, adoption of
the proposed ordinance would allow affidavits of exemption on agriculturally designated
lands and would limit such projects (as well as affidavits of exemption inside the Urban
Service Area) to less than 20 parcels. These proposed changes are consistent with current
comprehensive plan policies and direction given by the Board, and would reasonably
limit use of the affidavit of exemption process to smaller sized "projects" (creation of 1-
19 parcels).
The proposed ordinance does not change the current county -wide requirement that newly
created affidavit of exemption parcels front on either a public road or private platted road
right-of-waN. Pam Canady, an owner of agriculturally designated property, has proposed
that the county affidavit of exemption regulations be changed to allow private access
easements in lieu of the frontage requirement (see attachment #6). Staffs experience has
been that platted private road right-of-way (no paved road required) is better than use of
private easements because the platting requirements of LDR Chapter 913 already contain
appropriate right-of-way location, design, and dimension standards. 1 here are no such
standards for private easements. Also, platted rignts-of-way are better than private
easements because such rignts-of-way are established with a legal mechanism for proper
private maintenance, and require county and lot owner approval and notice prior to any
possible future changes. This platting process protects the county and lot owners in a
manner that cannot be provided by private easements, which could be amended without
notice or county review. Therefore, neither staff nor the PSAC rior the PZC support any
changes to the frontage requirements for affidavit of exemption lots, and none are
proposed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County_ Commissioners adopt the proposed
ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS
April 9, 2002
October 23, 2001 BCC Minutes
Staff Report for Januarv. 22. 2002 3CC ylecth I
Minutes from the January 22, 2002 RCC Meeting
LDR Section 954.1013)
February 21, 2002 PSAC Minutes
Canady "Easement Proposal'
Minutes tiom March 14, 2002 PZC Meeting
Proposed Ordinance
35
nri
Jc;
Director Boling responded to questions of Commissioners concerning the urban
service area and consideration of geographical boundaries. He thought the limitation to 19
houses would help in the development of very large parcels.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
George Beutell, 500016th Street, stated he was in favor ofthe affidavit of exemption.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Tippin, to approve staff's recommendation.
Commissioner Ginn advised that she was reluctant to approve this within the urban
service area but would vote in favor. She specified she will keep a sharp eye to see if it
looks like we are getting into some kind of a problem because of unpaved roads.
Chairman Stanbridge wanted to know how
and Director Boling advised that it could be
Development report to make people aware of it.
the public would be made aware of this,
included in the quarterly Community
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried unanimously. (Adopted Ordinance No. 2002-017
regarding use of the Affidavit of Exemption process for
dividing properties, amending the following chapters of the
Land Development Regulations (LDRs): Chapter 911, Zoning;
April 9, 2002
36
• •
and Chapter 913, Subdivisions and Plats; and providing for
repeal of conflicting provisions, codification, severability and
effective date.
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-017
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA REGARDING USE
OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION PROCESS FOR DIVIDING
PROPERTIES AMENDING THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS): CHAPTER 911, ZONING; AND
CHAPTER 913 SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS; AND PROVIDING FOR REPEAL
OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS CODIFICATION. SEVERABILITY AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNT\ , FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) BE AMENDED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. Zoning Ordinance section 911.06(4) is hereby amended as follows:
April 9, 2002
"(4) Uses. Uses in the agricultural and rural districts are classified as permitted uses,
administrative petnrit uses and special exception uses.
Site plan review shall be required for the construction, alteration and use of all structures and
buildings except single-family dwellings and permitted agricultural uses.
No residential development in agriculturally designated areas shall occur unless such
development is approved as a planned development and meets the requirements of section
911.14; the following activities shall be exempt from this requirement:
(a) Construction of a single-family dwelling unit on a tract or parcel existing on October
1, 1990.
(b) Division of a tract or parcel into two (2) lots, each meeting or exceeding the
minimum lot size of the agricultural zoning district and meeting the lot split criteria
of section 913.06(3); any subsequent split of such property shall require approval in
accordance with subdivision ordinance Chapter 913 requirements or planned
development requirements.
(c) Division of a tract into parcels of at least forty (40) acres in size.
(d) Division of a tract via a subdivision plat or affidavit of exemption approved in
accordance with subdivision ordinance Chapter 913 requirements "
37
n !.J
1.1 1\
L..
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-017
2. Subdivision Ordinance Section 913.06(5) is hereby amended to read as follows:
"(5) Affidavit of exemption An affidavit of exemption from certain requirements of section
913.08 may be applied for in conjunction with proposals to create parcels containing
more than two hundred thousand (200,000) square feet.
(A) All affidavit of exemption application/requests
shall be exempt from the following portions of section
913.08 (Required Improvements):
913.08(1)(A) --Streets
913.08(1)(C) --Utilities systems
913.08(1)(D) --Erosion control provisions
913.08(1)(E)--Stormwater and floodwater management system according to
Chapter 930
913.08(1)(F) --Street signs and traffic control markings and signs
913.08(1)(G) --Permanent control points
913.08(2)(A) --Bikeways
913.08(2)(B) --Sidewalks
913.08(2)(C) --Alleys
913.08(2)(D) --Buffering facilities and areas
913.08(2)(E) --Fire hydrants
913.08(2)(F) --Parks and recreational areas and facilities (see section 913.09(20)
913.08(2)(H) --Curbing
913.08(2)(I) --Street lights
913.08(2)(x) --Bridges and culverts when necessary
913.08(2)(L) --Filling and drainage as necessary
913.08(2)04) Traffic control devices as necessary
913.08(2)(N) Header curbs
913.08(2)(R) --Transportation system improvements (off-site and on-site)
April 9, 2002
•
38
t
• •
April 9, 2002
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-017
(B) The following required improvements/design standards shall apply to all affidavit of
exemption application/requests:
913.08(1)(B) --Easements
913.08(1)(H) --Rights-of-way
913.08(1)(I) --Trees and vegetation protection
913.08(2)(G) --Beach access structures and areas
913.08(2)(0) --Native vegetation preserve areas
913.08(2)(P) --Environmentally sensitive land preserve areas
913.08(2)(Q) --Emergency access
913.08(2)(S) --Marginal and limited access easements
913.08(2)(T) --Other provisions as may be required by land development
regulations
1. Right-of-way width and dedication standards and requirements shall apply to
affidavit of exemption application/requests
2_No platting is required unless it is necessary to provide road right-of-way
frontage for the proposed parcel(s).
(C). 1. No affidavit of exemption development or aggregation of proposed
affidavits of exemption shall be approved as an affidavit(s) of exemption if
such development proposes the creation of ti ftv (50) twenty (20) or more
parcels. Any proposal to create tifty (50) twenty (20) or more building
sites via proposed development or aggregation of developments shall
constitute a subdivision and shall require approval as a subdivision or
agricultural planned development (P D.1. All provisions of this chapter
shall apply
�h t34ticf t� �t + zenu�(i��n rr tug
h�
t nx
�dnre,ts(i
a coon U61 I)�,
Each parcel resulting from the proposed division of land shall contains
five (5) or more acres. except as allowed below. When the tract prior to
dividing is a size which is not an even multiple of five (5) acres and does
not lend itself to division into lots each containing more than five (5)
acres, a fractional breakdown resulting in lots of equal size not less than
two hundred thousand (200,000) square feet in size qualifies for this
exemption provision.
3.4. If the developer elects to divide the land by filing a plat, or if road right-of-
way is to be created, all requirements of this chapter 913 shall be complied
with except for those requirements or provisions specifically exempted in
section 913.06(51(A).
39
ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 017
The applicant shall deeds by donation to the county all rights-of-way
necessary to comply with the minimum local road right-of-way standards
and all streets created are at least the minimum street width required by
section 913.09(3)(B).
Where a common area( -s) or private road rights-of-way is created, the
owner shall establish a landowner's association and simultaneously file a
declaration of covenants and restrictions, acceptable in form to the county
attorney, in the public records providing for all common areas and rights-
of-way to be dedicated to the landowner's association and provisions made
for their perpetual maintenance. The plat of applicable) and declaration of
restrictions and plat 1 if applicable) shall contain the following language in
bold type:
"The common areas and rights-of-way are not dedicated to the
public and will not be maintained, repaired or improved by the
county."
The owner shall files a declaration of restrictions prohibiting the voluntary
division of land encompassed within the project into lots that are less than
lour and seven eighths {4 7/8) ucrestwo hundred thousand (200,000)
square feet in size unless such division is accomplished by filing a plat
approved by the county and meeting all standards required of subdivisions
under this chapter.
The owner shall files an "affidavit of exemption" in the public records
prior to dividing the land which shall contain:
A legal description of the land encompassed within the project and
a certified survey depicting all parcels created by the division, all
private and public streets and easements;
b. The official book, or plat book, and page number of official
records of Indian River County where the items required in
paragraphs 3, 4, 5 6, and 6 f may be found; and
The approval of the public works and community development
directors and the county attorney's office.
(D)(B4 Application process for affidavit. All applications for affidavits of exemption shall
comply with the applicable procedural and informational requirements of section
913.07(3) ' formal pre -application conference" and shall be reviewed and
approved by the technical review committee (TRC).'
3. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida which conflict with the pros inions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict. All special Acts of the legislature applying only to the
unincorporated portion of the Indian River County which conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
April 9, 2002
40
• •
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-017
4. Codification
The provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the County Code and the word
Ordinance" may be changed to "section". "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections
of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered to accomplish such intentions.
5. Severability
If any section, part of a sentence, paragraph, phrase or word of this ordinance is for any reason
held to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holdings shall not affect the remaining
portions hereof and it shall be construed to have been the legislative intent to pass this ordinance
without such unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative part.
6. Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Secretary of State.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 27th day of Marc
2002, for a public hearing to be held on the 9th day of April . 2002, at which
time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner 1lacht , seconded by
Commissioner Ti ppi n , and adopted by the following vote:
The ordinance was adopted by a vote of
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 9th day
of April ,2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Attest: J.K. Barton, Clerk
--/C z By: _,„,c474 -„e,„ -_,-•
Deputy Clerk Ruth M. Stanbridge
Chairman
Filed with the Florida Department of State on the day of
2002.
April 9, 2002
41
ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 017
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
( (L uta,
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANTING MATTERS
2/
4"
1{bert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
Coding: Words in Gtr kc through are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions.
'12ILESERVERVPUBLIC.CommunitY Dcvclopment. IscrsvCurDev'.ORDIANCfi\atfidav it 0
•
exemp.doe.:'.0
9.8.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM JAMES D.
ST. CLAIR TO DISCUSS "THE NOISE PROBLEM WITH THE ST.
EDWARD'S UPPER SCHOOL AIR CONDITIONERS"
Not present.
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM BRIAN
HEADY TO DISCUSS "GOVERNING BY DECEPTION AND LIES"
AND "THE COST TO COUNTY TAXPAYERS OF SUCH
MALFEASANCE"
Not present.
11.C.1. TRANSFER/ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE FOR THE GIFFORD
YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER
General Services Director Tom Frame reviewed a Memorandum of April 1, 2002:
April 9, 2002
42
•
Date: April 1, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director <714 -et -e--€4 tc •`_�4�4-c —r
Subject: Transfer/Assignment of Lease for the Gifford Youth Activity Center
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter fotnt Carter Hopkins dated March 13, 2002;
2. Copy of Letter from Arthur .1 Harris President of Progressive Civic League of Gifford,
Florida, Inc.. to Attorney Sam Block related to action taken by Progressive Civic League of
Gifford on December 17, 2001:
3. Copy of Articles of Incorporation for Gifford Youth Activity Center, Inc.;
4. Copy of Bylaws of Gifford Youth Activity Center. Inc.;
s. Copy of Articles of Incorporation for Gifford Youth Activity Center Foundation, Inc.;
6. Copy of Bylaws of Gifford Youth Activity Center Foundation, Inc.;
7. Copy of Existing Lease between Indian River County and Progressive Civic League of
Gifford, Florida, Inc.
BACKGROUND:
\ttached, please find a letter from iv[r. Carter Hopkins relative to the Gifford Youth Activity
Center (GMAC). In essence, it is the desire of GYAC to be able to either be assigned the lease
between the Indian River County and the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, Florida. Inc., or
enter into a new lease with the County. The second part of the request is to extend the tem' of
the lease from its present 20 -year tetui to one that is forty (40) to fifty (50) years in length.
RECOMLLIENDATION:
Since there is support from the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, Florida, Inc., to transfer the
operations to the Gifford Youth Activity Center Inc., staff needs directions as to the Board's
desire relative to the transfer (or new lease) and length of the tenni for the lease.
Commissioner Adams was pleased that the Gifford Youth Activity Center is moving
forward by incorporating. She preferred to have a new lease for the facility in order to
update it on indemnification and other matters. She suggested the County Attorney look
over the old lease with Mr Carter Hopkins, then draft and bring back a new lease to the
Commissioners.
Commissioner Macht thought the term of the lease should be conceptually agreed
upon and suggested 40-50 years is very common. The stability ofyears is necessary in order
to attract contributors and obtain financing.
April 9, 2002
43
n
4.+
•
Commissioner Adams preferred to see a lease for 20 years and Commissioner Macht
gave assurances that under a longer term lease, the County would have the option to
terminate if necessary.
Commissioner Ginn indicated she would favor 40 years. She pointed out that
Section 2 of the GYAC by-laws speaks of mortgaging and disposing of property. She
wanted it clear that County property cannot be encumbered.
Carter Hopkins, 1580 Gracewood Lane, explained that part of the ability to raise
funds allows contributions of cash, stock, and real estate. The clause in the by-laws pertains
to that type of asset (real estate). Obviously the County property could not be mortgaged by
the GYAC.
Commissioner Ginn asked that an annual audit be included in the new lease.
Mr. Hopkins explained that GYAC has been operating under the Progressive Civic
League of Gifford's "umbrella" which has been audited in the past.
Assistant Administrator Baird advised that all non -profits that receive County funds
are audited.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously directed that the
County Attorney's office work with Mr. Carter Hopkins on a
new lease for the Gifford Youth Activity Center which shall be
brought back to the Board for their consideration.
April 9, 2002
44
iii
• •
11.C.2. AUTHORIZATION TO SELL COUNTY -OWNED REAL
PROPERTY TO HIGHEST BIDDER - LOTS 185,199, AND 200, BLOCK
14, W. E. GEOFFREYS SUBDIVISION
General Services Director Tom Frame reg iewed a Memorandum of April 1, 2002:
Date: April 1, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director .-ILtizd cz,
Subject: Authorization to Sell Real Property to Highest Bidder
BACKGROUND:
Attached Exhibit "A" depicts a portion of land located near the northeast intersection of U.S. 1 and 37th
Street. The property shown in yellow is property that is currently owned by Indian River County. The
County gained ownership of this property through delinquent taxes. The exact owned portion is Lots 185,
199 and 200 of Block 14, W.E. Geoffrey's Subdivision. And, the County owns the east one-half of
vacated 19`h Avenue lying between 37`s Street and 37"' Place. A portion of lots 199 and 200 halie been
acquired for the additional right-of-way of 37"' Street.
General Services was contacted to determine if there was any desire on the part of the County to sell this
property. In response to the inquiry, the departments within the County were asked if there was any need
to keep this property for governmental purposes. Utility Services through Erik Olson and Steve Doyle
responded to the need for a regional lift station site.
Currently, the property value that is carried by the Property Appraiser is 574,430. If the County were to
consider selling the property, it is required to sell by publishing a notice for two weeks in the newspaper
calling for bids for the purchase of the real estate. In the case of a sale, the bid of the highest bidder
complying with the terms and conditions set forth in such notice shall be accepted, unless the Board of
County Commissioners rejects all bids because they are too low.
It is suggested that should a sale be authorized, the minimum sale price be set at 585,652, which is 15
above the just value established by the Property Appraiser. Additionally, the sale should be subject a
utility easement of 25 feet by 30 feet to be located on either Lot 199 or 200. The Florida Statutes also
authorizes the use of a bid bond should the Board so desire.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the sale of the property (Lots 185, 199, 200 and easterly portion of vacated 19th Avenue) by the
use of sealed bids properly advertised and including a minimum bid amount of S55,652 with the bid to be
awarded to the highest bidder. That any sale be subject to a utility easement for a lift station to be not
larger than 25 feet by 30 feet on either Lot 199 or 200. The use of a 10 % deposit be a required bid bond.
April 9, 2002
45
In response to Commissioner Adams' question concerning a lift station, Director
Frame advised that, according to the Utilities Department's staff, the area needed would be
25' x 30' and staff would attempt to work with the purchaser in order to maintain an
easement for that purpose.
Commissioner Adams thought it would be wise to determine the area and location
first and Director Frame agreed that could be included in the bid documents.
There was a brief discussion concerning sealed bid versus auctioning the property.
He was aware of interest by nearby property owners, but because of their size, Director
Frame was unsure how marketable these 3 lots would be.
Because of the limited market, Commissioner Adams believed an auctioneer would
have the ability to market the lots better.
Director Frame felt the sealed bid would be easier to manage, but he would be happy
to look at the auction process if that was the Board's pleasure.
Administrator Chandler explained why staff reached their conclusion that the sealed
bid process would be better and why there would not be much advantage to go the auction
route in this particular instance.
Commissioner Adams felt the sealed bid process would limit the market and limit the
price the County would get; she thought auction was better based on their success a few
years ago.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Tippet, to approve staff's
recommendation.
Deputy County Attorney Collins cautioned that there are some statutory procedures
in order to surplus property that involve advertising and he thought there were some
April 9, 2002
46
• •
constraints on how we dispose of surplus property.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTIO\ and the motion
carried unanimously. (Authorized the sale of the property [lots
185, 199, 200 and the easterly portion of vacated 19' Avenue]
by the use of sealed bids properly advertised and including a
minimum bid amount of $85,652 with the bid to be awarded to
the highest bidder; any sale shall be subject to a utility easement
for a lift station to be not larger than 25 feet by 30 feet on either
Lot 199 or 200 [location shall be specified in the bid
documents], as recommended by staff. [Note: A 10% bid bond
deposit shall be required.])
11.C.3. CABLE TV FRANCHISE - COMBINE AT&T AND
COMCAST CORPORATIONS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 2, 2002:
Date: April 2, 2002
To: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Through: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
Through: Thomas W. Frame, Director'/ l/.. �x
Department of General Services
From. Terry L. Smith, Telecommunications AiIanager�i
Department of General Services %""
Subject: Change of Control of CATV Franchise — AT&T and Comcast
BACKGROUND:
AT&T and Comcast Corporations have announced their intention to combine their Cable TV
systems into a new public company, AT&T Comcast Corporation. The initial correspondence
from AT&T indicated that in their opinion, the founal approval process was not needed, and that
April 9, 2002
47
a notification letter was all that was required in this case. Indian River County's Attorney
disagreed with this conclusion, and a letter has been sent to AT&T requesting the information
necessary for the formal approval process. The franchise holder will not change, but the new
AT&T Comcast Corporation will become a new indirect parent company for the franchise
holder. This resulting change in control will require approval by the Board of County
Commissioners. Indian River County Ordinance 82-7 states that such approval may not be
unreasonably withheld by the Commission and that a public hearing fee up to $500 may be
charged.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the opinion of the County Attorney, staff recommends that the Board authorize the
scheduling of a public hearing for the consideration of the request for transfer and control of the
franchise for Cable TV service in Indian River County. The public hearing date will be set after
Indian River County has received and reviewed the form 394 package from AT&T. Staff
recommends not charging the S500 00 public hearing fee.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously authorized the
scheduling of a public hearing for the consideration of the
request for transfer and control of the franchise (combine
AT&T and Comcast) for Cable TV services in Indian River
County to be scheduled after the County has received and
reviewed the Form 394 package from AT&T, and the County
shall not charge the $500 public hearing fee, all as
recommended in the memorandum.
11.G.1. GIFFORD AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT - CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. - RELEASE OF RETAINAGE
AND REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 1, 2002:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director
FROM: W. Keith McCully, P.E., Esq., Stormwater Engineer jeet
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RELEASE OF RETAINAGE FOR GIFFORD AREA
STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
April 9, 2002
DATE: April 1, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On August 4, 1998, at their regular meeting, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the
Chairman to execute the Professional Civil Services Master Agreement, between Carter Associates,
Inc. and Indian River County, for the Gifford Area Stounwater Improvement Project. The
consultant, Carter Associates, Inc. has completed all work items listed in Work Order No. 4 and has
submitted the Final Pay Request for Work Order No. 4, which includes the final retainage. Only
Work Order No. 5 remains which is for additional service work related to wetland mitigation
peuuitting. This request is to release the contract retainage amount, S4,328.69.
RFCOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chaii rnan to approve and sign
this request for Final Payment by Carter Associates, Inc.
FUND LNG
Funding to be from Account No. 315-243-538-068.11
ATTACHMENTS
One copie.. of the Final Pay Request
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
request from Carter Associates, Inc. for Final Payment/release
of retainage in the amount of $4,328.69, and authorized the
chairman to execute same, as recommended in the
Memorandum.
DOCUMENTATION WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
April 9, 2002
11.G.2. LICENSE FOR USE OF COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A
SIGN ALONG INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - BRIDGEWATER
INVESTMENT, LLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of March 27, 2002:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
License Agreement for Bridgewater Investments LLC to Use
County Property along Indian River Boulevard
March 27, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Bridgewater Investments, LLC requests permission to erect a sign
within the right-of-way on Indian River Boulevard. The County
staff has no objection, and has prepared the attached license
agreement.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The County property affected is right-of-way along the west side of
Indian River Boulevard, south of 17th Street and north of the 14th
Street canal. The sign will be placed over 20' ft. from the
roadway.
.The alternatives are as follows:
Alternative No. 1
Approve the License Agreement
Alternative No. 2
eny the Agreement.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff- recommends Alternative If 1 whereby the License is approved.
ATTACHMENT
License Agreement
April 9, 2002
Public Works Director James Davis responded to questions concerning this sign by
advising that while the business lees within the City of Vero Beach city limits and the City
will have approval under their sign ordinance, the sign will be placed on County right-of-
way just west of the swale. Because this area on Indian River Boulevard is particularly
wide, the location of the sign for a new office building will give the appearance of being on
private property.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the
License Agreement with Bridgewater Investments, LLC to use
County property along Indian River Boulevard, as
recommended in the memorandum. (Alternative No. 1)
LICENSE AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.H.1. RESOLUTION NOS. 2002-020 AND 2002-021 - SEBASTIAN
WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -D & E - RESOLUTIONS I AND II
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 1, 2002:
APRIL 1, 2002
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
PREPARED
AND STAFFED
BY:
W. ERIK OLSON �C_)
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY,SERV CES
JAMES D. CHASTaN
MANAGER OF ASSE
DEPARTMENT TTILITY SERVICES
LENT PROJECTS
SUBJECT:
SEBASTIAN WATER EXPANSION PHASE III -D & E
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO'S UW -97 -19 -DS & DS 97-20 DS
RESOLUTIONS I AND II
April 9, 2002
BACKGROUND
On September 29, 1995, Indian River County entered into an Agreement with the City of Sebastian to
assume ownership of the City's water distribution and wastewater collection systems. As a part of the
contract, the County agreed to expand the water distribution system. On June 18, 1996, the Indian River
County Board of County Commissioners approved Staffs recommendation for the County to proceed
with the installation of water lines as set forth in the Inter -local Agreement between Indian River County
and the City of Sebastian. Said Agreement provided for the transfer of the City of Sebastian's water and
wastewater system to Indian River County.
On July 24, 2001, at a public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners approved combining Phase's
III -B & III -C for construction and bidding purposes. Construction of Phase III -B is complete and III -C
should be completed by September 2002. (See attached agenda item and copy of minutes —Attachment 1.)
Staff is now ready to proceed with Phase's III -D & IH -E, which will complete the installation of
approximately 109.4 miles of water lines in Sebastian Highlands.
ANALYSIS
Within the Phase III -D & III -E project area. East & West of Laconia Street. between Clearmont Street &
Capon Terrace. and between Granduer & Gladiola Avenue's there are 1433 lots and tracts, and
approximately 602 homes, to benefit from this project. Typical platted lot sizes are .25 acre, plus or
minus.
More effective management of project construction, inspections, cash flows, and interaction with property
owners is being accomplished by having divided Phases II and III into smaller projects. This has enabled
more utility construction contractors to bid on these projects. possibly making the bid process more
competitive. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment projects, as divided into
parts A, B, C, D & E for Phase III (Attachment 2) This project will provide potable water and fire
protection to an area noted for failing well systems. The City of Sebastian is waiting for the completion
of the water fine installation in order to complete road & drainage improvements and comply with
bonding requirements.
Engineering design has been completed by the staff of the Department of Utility Services and we are now
ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project, as outlined herein. A summary
assessment roll for Phase III -D & E is attached (Attachment 4). The full assessment roll is on file in the
commission office. This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the
proposed water line route. Financing will be from the assessment fund 473. If needed, inter -fund
borrowing will be available from the capacity fee fund 472. The estimated project cost and amount to be
assessed for Phase's III -D & III -E is S 3,166,394.30 (rounded) (Attachment -3). The estimated cost per
square foot is 50.217507 (rounded). The actual assessed cost. as with any project will be determined
based on actual competitive bid prices
April 9, 2002
52
3U�
Project No.
Lots
Parcel
Nos./
Homes
I.D.
-ALL
OF
PHASE
Locations
SOUTH
OF
CR
512 &
HI IS
SOUTHWEST
OF
BARBER STREET
III -A UW -97 -I6 -DS
891
786 / 384
South of Caravan Terrace with Periwinkle Drive
along the South & West
III -B UW -97 -17 -DS
530
458 / 239
East of Laconia St.& West of Shakespeare Si.
Between Crystal Mist & Lanfair Ave's
III -C UW -97 -18 -DS
900
822 / 414
Between Laconia & Barber St's , between Bayfront
Terrace and Rolling Hills (Lansdowne)
698
639 / 279
East of Laconia St., between Clearmont & Capon
Streets.
III -D L- W -97 -19 -DS
HI -E UW -97 -20 -DS
735
654 / 323
West of Laconia St, between Granduer &
Gladiola Avenue's
Total
3,754
3,359 /1,639
South of CR 512 and SW of Barber Street
Engineering design has been completed by the staff of the Department of Utility Services and we are now
ready to begin the assessment process associated with this project, as outlined herein. A summary
assessment roll for Phase III -D & E is attached (Attachment 4). The full assessment roll is on file in the
commission office. This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the
proposed water line route. Financing will be from the assessment fund 473. If needed, inter -fund
borrowing will be available from the capacity fee fund 472. The estimated project cost and amount to be
assessed for Phase's III -D & III -E is S 3,166,394.30 (rounded) (Attachment -3). The estimated cost per
square foot is 50.217507 (rounded). The actual assessed cost. as with any project will be determined
based on actual competitive bid prices
April 9, 2002
52
3U�
•
On April 1, 2002, a letter was sent to the City Manager, of the City of Sebastian, with a copy of a draft
agenda item and a map of the project area (Attachment 5).
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Resolutions I and 11 and set the public hearing date.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
I -Minutes of BCC meeting 7-24-01
2 -Map of Project area
3 -Estimated Project cost
4 -Summary assessment roll
5 -Letter to City of Sebastian
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2002-020 providing for Phases III -D and III -E
water expansion in the City of Sebastian, Florida (east and west
of Laconia Street, between Clearmont Street and Capon
Terrace, and between Granduer and Gladiola Avenues);
providing the total estimated cost, method of payment of
assessments, number of annual installments, and description of
the area to be served.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 020
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR PHASES III -D AND
III E WATER EXPANSION IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA (EAST
AND WEST OF LACONIA STREET BETWEEN CLEARMONT STREET
AND CAPON TERRACE, AND BETWEEN GRANDUER AND GLADIOLA
AVENUES); PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS,
AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA TO BE SERVED
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined
that the improvements herein described are necessary to promote the public welfare of the
county and has determined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
specially benefited properties to be serviced by a water main extension for Phase III -D and III -E
in the City of Sebastian, Florida, east and west of Laconia Street, between Clearmont Street
and Capon Terrace, and between Granduer and Gladiola Avenues.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a water line shall be installed to benefit 1433 lots
and tracts in the Phase III -D and III -E area, east and west of Laconia Street, between
Clearmont Street and Capon Terrace. and between Granduer and Gladiola Avenues in the
April 9, 2002
53
Bi1
r
U3
•
City of Sebastian, Florida, and that the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 206.01 through 206 09 of The Code of Indian
River County.
2. The combined estimated cost for projects Phases III -D and III -E is $3,166,394.30
(rounded) For Phases III -D and III -E the estimated cost to be assessed is $0.217507
(rounded) per square foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the
assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services. Assessments are to be
levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the
improvements and specially benefited thereby and further designated by the assessment
plat with respect to the special assessments.
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.217507 (rounded) per square foot shall be
assessed against each of the specially benefited properties designated on the assessment
plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by action of the Board of County
Commissioners after the public hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced
County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid in full within 90 days
after the date of the resolution of the Board with respect to credits against the special
assessments after completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without interest. If
not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten equal yearly installments of
principal plus interest. If not paid when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the
principal not paid when due The unpaid balance of the special assessments shall bear
interest until paid at a rate to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners when
the project is completed.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a plat showing the area to
be assessed, plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost of the proposed
improvements. All of these are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall promptly be prepared in
connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County Utility Services Department
shall cause this resolution (along with a map showing the areas to be served) to be
published at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing as
required by Section 206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Gi nn and, upon being put to a vote,
the vote was as follows:
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R Macht
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this
day of Apri 1 , 2002
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
By'`.
Deputy Clerk
April 9, 2002
54
9th
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: /-P-271 feta_ -(_--.r.
Ruth M. Stanbnda Chairman
Lay
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2002-021 setting a time and place at which the
owners of properties located in Phases III -D and III -E water
expansion in the City of Sebastian, Florida (east and west of
Laconia Street, between Clearmont Street and Capon Terrace,
and between Granduer and Gladiola Avenues), and other
interested persons, may appear before the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County and be heard as to the
propriety and advisability of constructing the water main
extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment
therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be specially assessed
against each property benefitted thereby.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 021
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT
WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN PHASES III -D AND
III -E WATER EXPANSION IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA (EAST
AND WEST OF LACONIA STREET, BETWEEN CLEARMONT STREET
AND CAPON TERRACE AND BETWEEN GRANDUER AND GLADIOLA
AVENUES), AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR
B EFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY
O F CONSTRUCTING THE WATER MAIN EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST
THEREOF AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO
THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH
P ROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by
Resolution No. 2002- 020 , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens
of the county, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a waterline be installed to serve 1433 lots and tracts located in the City
of Sebastian, Florida, in Phases III -D and III -E, east and west of Laconia Street, between
Clearmont Street and Capon Terrace, and between Granduer and Gladiola Avenues; and
WHEREAS it has been determined that the cost to be specially assessed with respect
thereto shall be $0.217570 per square foot; and
April 9, 2002
55
,.l
•
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be
completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06 of the Code of Indian River provides that the Board of
County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County
Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such water
main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor, and as to the
amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County
Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at which time the
owners of the proper -ties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear
before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and the
properties to be specially benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment
plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special
assessments against the properties to be specially benefited may review the assessment
plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for
said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Department of
Utility Services any week day from 8.30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by two publications in the
Press Journal Newspaper one week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week
prior to the date of the hearing.
4. The Indian River County Department of Utility Services shall give the owner of each
property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place,
which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at
his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams
motion was seconded by Commissioner Ginn and the
vote, the vote was as follows: and, upon being put to a
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 9th
day of April , 2002.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
4.,
Deputy Clerk
Attachment: ASSESSMENT RO
FULL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE WITH THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
April 9, 2002
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By(, N
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
56
r
kor
13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - PELICAN ISLAND NATURAL
WILDLIFE REFUGE PARTNERSHIP CEREMONY
Chairman Stanbridge reported that this event, held on April 3, 2002, was a great
bonding experience since the attendees were huddled together under two tents in order to
get out of the hail, wind and rain. In spite of the weather, everybody had a good time. She
hopes that the weather will be more cooperative one year from now for the Grand Opening.
13.D. COMMISSIONER GINN - REPORT ON UTILITIES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING
ACCEPTANCE OF SLUDGE FROM INDIANTOWN COMPANY, INC.
Commissioner Ginn advised that the UAC meeting was held last Thursday to
consider the proposed sludge agreement from Indiantown Company, Inc. (See Minutes of
4/2/02, Item 7.K.) She reported that the proposed agreement was given a unanimous turn
down by the committee. The UAC also voted unanimously not to accept any more out -of -
county sludge and to cap the sludge at its present tonnage. Camp Dresser & McKee prepared
an extensive report concerning sludge. She cited some of the statistics from that report,
specified difficulties in processing, noted problems with odor control, and emphasized the
importance of not "squandering" the remaining capacity of our Landfill. She wished to
bring the matter back with a full report at the next Board meeting along with all backup
available.
In response to Commissioner Adams, Commissioner Ginn explained that processing
out -of -county sludge has not proven cost-effective, and Commissioner Adams understood
that the preference would be to find an alternative destination for the sludge, rather than
having it go into the Landfill.
Commissioner Ginn advised that CDM's report had covered that. She cautioned that
for the County to undertake either incineration or pelletization would be extremely costly
April 9, 2002
and there may not be any use for the pelletized product. There has been talk that the Solid
Waste Authority in Palm Beach County will be looking for additional sludge as they are
going to a pelletization process but are not quite there yet. She recommended that we
preserve the remaining space in our Landfill which is now predicted to last about 50 years.
There was CONSENSUS that the Board would act on the proposal from Indiantown
at the next meeting.
14.B.
None.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 9:50 a.m.
ATTEST:
Gar 1°2 _.-rsea-4.-4.5A.
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Minutes approved dj� 7 a&'
April 9, 2002