HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/21/2002MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Flonda 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman
Fran B Adams
Caroline D. Ginn
Kenneth R. Macht
District 2
District 4
District 1
District 5
District 3
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION Stan Boling
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE James E Chandler
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Additional Backup for Item 10.
2. Additional Backup for Item 11.1.
BACKUP
PAGES
PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation Designating the month of May, 2002
as Mental Health Month
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of May 7, 2002
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated May 10, 2002)
CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): C, d
B. GHA River Village, Inc.'s Request for Final Plat
Approval for River Village — Grand Harbor Plat 26
(Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated May 13, 2002)
9 BACKUP
PAGES
Kennedy Groves, Inc. Request for Final Plat Approval
for Old Orchid Phase III Subdivision — (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated May 14, 2002)
IRC Bid #4060 Portable Trailer Mounted Generator
(memorandum dated May 8, 2002) 54-69
Proclamation Honoring Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati 70
Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Anti Drug Abuse Grant Funding
(memorandum dated May 14, 2002) 71-72
Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge — Revised
Change Order No. 1 for Summit Construction Mgmt., Inc.
(memorandum dated May 13, 2002)
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 012
(memorandum dated May 13, 2002) 1 76-79
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR
13.94 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
26th STREET, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET WEST
OF 66th AVENUE, FROM A-1 AGRICULTURAL
DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES) TO RM -6,
MUL UPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND
EFFECTIVE DATE
Adamson request to rezone 113.94 acres from
A-1 to RM -6 (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated May 13, 2002)
•
•
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.):
2. Public Hearing to Consider Revenue Distribution
Formula for 6¢ Local Option Gas Tax
(memorandum dated May 13, 2002)
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
Scheduled for Public Hearing June 4, 2002:
Anthony J. Sciaccotta's request for an abandonment
of a portion of 84`h Terrace right-of-way south of
22°d St. within Paradise Park (Legislative)
(memorandum dated May 14, 2002)
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Extension of Local Option Sales Tax
FY 2004/05 through FY 2019/20
(memorandum dated May 15, 2002)
(backup under separate cover)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
1. Rental Fees for Use of Various Meeting Rooms at
County Library Facilities
(memorandum dated May 14, 2002)
2. Roofing Design Services
(memorandum dated May 14, 2002)
3. Change Order for Modular Office for Supervisor
of Elections
(memorandum dated May 15, 2002)
D. Leisure Services
None
•
BACKUP
PAGES
97-100
101
102-107
108-109
110-113
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (coned.):
E Office of Management and Budget
1. Munis Software Agreement
(memorandum dated May 15, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGES
114-117
Public Works
1. Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge
Public Improvements — Request for Release
of Retainage
(memorandum dated May 99, 2002)
118-120
Utilities
1. Department of Utility Services 452.200 MHz
UHF Wastewater Radio Telemetry Frequency
(memorandum dated May 10, 2002)
121-124
Human Services
Contract for Needs Assessment Consultant for Children's
Services Advisory Committee
(memorandum dated May 15, 2002)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
125-137
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Updates
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS (cont'.):
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of 5/7/02
IRC Bid #4059 Closed, high top, roll -off
recycling containers
(memorandum dated May 8, 2002)
Environmental Control Board
15. ADJOURNMENT
BACKUP
PAGES
138-151
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bccl.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00
p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until.:00 p.m.
Meeting broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MAY 21, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION -1 _
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE _ 1-
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS -2-
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation Designating the Month of May, 2002 as Mental Health Month -2-
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 7, 2002
CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. List of Warrants _4-
7.B GHA River Village, Inc. - Final Plat Approval for River Village - Grand
Harbor Plat 26 (Quasi -Judicial) -13-
7.C. Kennedy Groves, Inc. - Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase III
Subdivision (Quasi -Judicial) -15-
MAY 21, 2002
•
7 D Bid #4060 - Portable Trailer Mounted Generator (Utilities) - Alternative
Power Sources, LLC -17-
7 E Proclamation Honoring Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati -19-
7.F. Anti -Drug Abuse Grant Funding - Fiscal Year 2002-03 - Florida
Department of Law Enforcement - Multi -Agency Drug Enforcement Unit
(MACE) - PREVENT (Substance Abuse Council) - Substance Abuse
Council -21-
7.G. Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge - Revised Change Order #1 -
Summit Construction Management, Inc -23-
7.H. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #012 -24-
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2002-020 AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 13.94
ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 26TH STREET
APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET WEST OF 66TH AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RM -6
(JAMES AND LORA ADAMSON) (Quasi -Judicial) -27-
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - REVENUE DISTRIBUTION FORMULA FOR 6¢
LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 209 OF THE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE -39-
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 4,
2002 - ANTHONY J. SCIACCOTTA - REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF
A PORTION OF 84TH TERRACE RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH OF 22ND STREET
WITHIN PARADISE PARK (Legislative) -43-
MAY 21, 2002
-2-
ear
•
10. EXTENSION OF 10 LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX FY 2004/05
THROUGH FY 2019/20 -45-
11.C.1. COUNTY LIBRARY FACILITIES - RENTAL FEES FOR USE OF
VARIOUS MEETING ROOMS -53-
11.C.2. HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND JAIL ROOFING DESIGN SERVICES -
RESCIND R. L REEGER CONTRACT - APPROVE EDLUND
DRITENBAS CONTRACT -56-
11.C.3. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS - MODULAR OFFICE - CHANGE
ORDER - G. E CAPITAL MODULAR SPACE -58-
11 E 1 MUNIS SOFTWARE AGREEMENT -60-
11.G.1.
11.1-1.1.
JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT 9724 - BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES,
INC. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RETAINAGE -64-
UTILITY SERVICES 452.200 MHZ UHF WASTEWATER RADIO
TELEMETRY FREQUENCY - DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC. RADIO
TELEMETRY UNITS (RTUs) - TELECOM NETWORK, INC. .... -66-
MAY 21, 2002
-3-
0
«7
•
11.I. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE - NEEDS
ASSESSMENT CONSULTANT - PUBLIC SOLUTIONS, LLC (ROBIN
S. CLEMENTS) -68-
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES -69-
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT -69-
14 B SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT -69-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD -69-
MAY 21, 2002
-4-
DR
•
May 21, 2002
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, May 21, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman; John W.
Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also
present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Stanbridge called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Planning Director Stan Boling delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
County Administrator Jim Chandler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
MAY 21, 2002
-1-
•
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Stanbridge requested the following changes to today's Agenda:
1. Additional backup for Item 10.
2. Additional backup for Item 11.I.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously made the above changes to the
Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF MAY, 2002 AS MENTAL
HEALTH MONTH
The Chairman presented the following Proclamation to Margi Silberman of New
Horizons of the Treasure Coast and to Kristine Sarkauskas, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Mental Health Association, who both expressed their thanks for the
recognition:
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF MAY, 2002, AS
MENTAL HEALTH MONTH
WHEREAS, mental health problems do not discriminate; they know no race, creed, age limit
or economic status; and
WHEREAS, one in five American adults and children are affected by a mental illness, however
people with mental illness can recover and lead full productive lives; and
MAY 21, 2002
-2-
OK r i"0 ) 3
• •
WHEREAS, over 92,000 adults with serious and persistent mental illnesses and over 79,000
children with serious emotional disturbances have no access to mental health treatment in Florida; and
WHEREAS, untreated or under -treated mental illness costs public and private employers
billions of dollars annually through absenteeism, turnover, low productivity and increased medical costs;
and
WHEREAS, nearly 25% of Florida's jail inmates have a serious mental illness and local jails
have become the largest public psychiatric hospitals, housing over 10,000 offenders with mental
illnesses, many of whom are low level offenders; and
WHEREAS, the month of May has been designated National Mental Health Month, with more
than 340 Mental Health Associations nationwide undertaking public awareness education and
fundraising initiatives; and
WHEREAS, New Horizons of the. Treasure Coast provides comprehensive mental health and
substance abuse services to over 2,500 Indian River County residents each year, regardless of their
ability to pay
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY . THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA that the month of May, 2002, be designated
as
MENTAL HEALTH MONTH
in Indian River County.
Adopted this 21st day of May, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
71,
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chaiitnan
Margi Silberman announced that New Horizons is sponsoring a program tomorrow
night at their Midway Road Campus, called "All Stressed Up With No Place To Go". She
invited the public to attend.
MAY 21, 2002
-3-
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 7, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of May 7, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
May 7, 2002, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Ginn requested that Item 7 E be separated for discussion.
7.A. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 10, 2002:
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: May 10, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board,
for the time period of May 03, 2002 to May 09, 2002.
MAY 21, 2002
-4-
lpfl
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously approved the list of Warrants as issued
by the Clerk to the Board for May 3-9, 2002, as
recommended by staff.
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0021729
0021730
0021731
0021732
0021733
0021734
0021735
0021736
0021737
0021738
0021739
0021740
0021741
0021742
0021743
0021744
0021745
0021746
0021747
0021748
0021749
0021750
0021751
0021752
0322840
0322841
0322842
0322843
0322844
0322845
0322846
0322847
0322848
0322849
0322850
0322851
0322852
0322853
0322854
0322855
0322856
0322857
0322858
MAY 21, 2002
KOMARNICKI, WALTER SR
MCGRIFF, BARBARA R
UNUMPROVIDENT INSURANCE
HIGHMARR LIFE INSURANCE
BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL, INC
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND
IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE-
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
IRS - ACS
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
NACO/SOUTHEAST
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
FL SDU
A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
ACTION TRANSMISSION AND
ADRON FENCE COMPANY
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
ACTION ANSWERING SERVICE
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
ADAMSON, RONALD
ABS PUMPS, INC
ADDISON OIL CO
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
A T & T
ASHWORTH INC
ALL INDIAN RIVER FENCE CO
ASHBROOK CORPORATION
ARROW MAGNOLIA INTERNATIONAL
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
-5-
CHECK
DATE
2002-05-03
2002-05-03
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-06
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-08
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
ru
CHECK
AMOUNT
120.00
465.00
3,962.64
4,216.30
4,716.11
2,312.22
567.82
11,937.35
264.60
1,125.89
35,362.50
138.50
115.38
37.75
50.00
50.00
639.86
2,500.00
81,166.33
193.86
9,990.77
207.40
132.46
7,997.34
301.75
745.00
50.00
1,323.36
44.90
328.50
446.26
97.00
403.50
530.63
3,609.81
352.48
15.50
102.85
230.37
70.00
887.36
564.76
5,585.32
•
O 322859 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO
O 322860 A T & T
O 322861 APOLLO ENTERPRISES
0322862 AMERITREND HOMES
0322863 ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
0322864 ATLANTIC PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
0322865 ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT
0322866 AARP INSURANCE PLAN
0322867 ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
0322868 ASSOCIATES IN PSYCHIATRY
0322869 ARMY/NAVY OUTDOORS
0322870 AT&T BROADBAND
0322871 AMERICAN ENGINEERING SERVICES
0322872 AUTO SUPPLY CO WEST
0322873 ANDERSON, TIMOTHY
0322874 ALI, MD SABRI
0322875 ALARM PARTNERS
0322876 BARNEY'S PUMPS
0322877 BARTH CONSTRUCTION
0322878 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
0322879 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
0322880 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
0322881 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
0322882 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC
O 322883 BURGOON BERGER
0322884 BAKER & TAYLOR INC
0322885 BLACKBURN, GERALDINE
0322886 BRODART CO
0322887 BRYANT, BILL & ASSOCIATES
0322888 BARER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
0322889 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
0322890 BELL, AMBER
0322891 BESANCON, MARK
0322892 BARILLA, JAMES
0322893 BOOKS ON TAPE INC
0322894 BELLSOUTH
0322895 BEAZER HOMES, INC
0322896 BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF
0322897 BRADFORD, MADGE A
0322898 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
0322899 BLACK DIAMOND
0322900 BUZA, PAUL W DO
0322901 BREVARD ORTHHOPAEDIC CLINIC
0322902 BRACKETT, PARKER & ASSOCIATES
0322903 BLACKBURN, THOMAS
0322904 BIOMASS PROCESSING
0322905 BATTERY ZONE
0322906 BROWNING, CARLEAN
0322907 BLUE SHIELD FLORIDA
0322908 BREWER, BURVIN
0322909 BRODNER, MD ROBERT A
0322910 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF
0322911 BELLSOUTH
0322912 CAMERON & BARKLEY CO
0322913 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
0322914 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS
0322915 CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
0322916 CLASSIC AWARDS
0322917 COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
0322918 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO
0322919 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
0322920 COX GIFFORD FUNERAL HOME
0322921 CAMPBELL, PETER
0322922 CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC
0322923 COPELAND, LINDA
MAY 21, 2002
-6-
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
371.00
105.13
1,120.20
500.00
500.00
46.00
20,498.22
54.54
306.00
46.00
132.00
39.95
53,337.00
1,132.93
300.00
104.00
884.15
2,379.00
43,110.00
3,879.37
8.00
46,647.34
2,633.00
115.20
1,000.00
2,431.84
51.54
3,789.52
73,707.93
14.98
295.76
67.00
6.00
42.83
360.92
5,472.66
1,000.00
41,809.11
87.50
70.76
20.00
33.30
176.45
500.00
14.09
86,190.65
112.80
51.50
198.07
54.21
500.00
67.00
264.08
167.54
11,899.38
125.00
229.95
171.00
1,217.25
500.00
3,247.03
800.00
270.93
348.50
178.50
tvi
•
0322924
0322925
0322926
0322927
0322928
0322929
0322930
0322931
0322932
0322933
0322934
0322935
0322936
0322937
0322938
CLEM, POLACKWICH AND VOCELLE
CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO.
CLEVELAND, CLARENCE
COMFORT INN LAKE BUENA VISTA
CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
COLUMBIA HOUSE
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
COLEMAN, CHARLES
COURT REPORTERS,' INC
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
COASTAL TITLE SERVICES
COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC &
CUTTER & BUCK
0322939 COOPER, PAMELA J
0322940 CALLAWAY GOLF BALL CO
0322941 COLLEGIATE PACIFIC
0322942 CLARRY, ALISON
0322943 CHOICEPOINT BUSINESS &
0322944 CASA MONICA HOTEL
0322945 CADTECH SEMINARS
0322946 BIG.SKY COMPUTER PRODUCTS
0322947 CENTRAL FLORIDA HAND CENTER
0322948 CARNZCELLA, JAMES
0322949 CLEMENTS III, ROY W
0322950 DAILY COURIER SERVICE
0322951 DAVES SPORTING GOODS
0322952 DELTA SUPPLY CO
0322953 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
INC
0322
0322
0322
0322
0322
0322
0322
03229
03229
03229
03229
03229
03229
03229
03229
03229
032297
032297
032297
032297
032297
032297
032297
032297
032297
0322979
0322980
0322981
0322982
0322983
0322984
0322985
0322986
0322987
0322988
954 DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
955 DICKERSONFLORIDA, INC
956 DIRECTOR, KENNETH L MD PA
957 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
958 DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
959 DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE
960 DAVIS, JERRY
61 DADE PAPER COMPANY
62 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
63 DIVINE SERVICE ENTERPRISES INC
64 DIGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC
65 DURA -STRESS, INC
66 DISCOVERY INN
67 DELL MARKETING L.P.
68 E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
69 E G P, INC
0 ELLIS K PHELPS AND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MAY 21, 2002
CO, INC
EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
ELDRIDGE, MYRA A
ELPEX, INC
EDLUND & DRITENBAS
EXPEDITER INC, THE
EWING, MARSHA
ELITE TITLE OF THE TREASURE
EVERGLADES FARM
ELLIS, ANGIE
FEDEX
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
7-
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05_09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
235.00
105,784.00
51.26
35.95
824.12
3.25
228.00
21.57
8,007.51
10.00
238.90
226.91
19.16
189.00
380.15
334.00
792.08
535.00
24.00
25.00
396.00
479.00
1,754.29
90.22
92.68
500.00
1,818.00
120.68
218.24
2,255.11
12.53
3,211.42
85.00
57.75
868.95
625.00
479.10
748.38
325.94
=190.00
287.50
27,495.00
245.00
19,919.00
88.50
344.00
18.92
5.00
205.00
318.50
1,429.33
1,216.41
70.25
6.00
15.55
1,156.77
200.00
82.23
87.55
4,689.59
1,026.15
2,628.63
272.07
997.20
115.00
1
0322989
0322990
0322991
0322992
0322993
0322994
0322995
0322996
0322997
0322998
0322999
F W& P C O A
FENIMORE, CHARLES
FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE
F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
FACTICON, INC
FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
FIRSTLAB
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
FLORIDA COPY DATA
0323000 FAIT, CHARLOTTE
0323001 FLORIDA STORMWATER ASSOCIATION
0323002 FLESCHER, ROSEMARY
0323003 FERRELLGAS
0323004 GALE GROUP, THE
0323005 GILLESPIE, JOHN
0323006 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
0323007 GALL'S INC
0323008 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
0323009 GOLFNET, INC
0323010 GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER
0323011 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE
0323012 GAGEL, SALOI
0323013 GREAT -FULLY DEAD PEST MGMT INC
0323014 GARVEY, ELEANOR
0323015 HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
0323016 HACH COMPANY
0323017 HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
0323018 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
0323019 HANSEN, SUSAN
0323020 HEALTHSOUTH HOLDINGS
0323021 HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
0323022 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE
0323023 HURLEY,ROGNER,MILLER,COX AND
0323024 RERAN, DEAN C.
0323025 INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS
0323026 HORNUNG'S
0323027 HUBERT, LATOSHIA
0323028 HYDRANAUTICS
0323029 HAMILTON, DUSTIN
0323030 HITCH, ROBERT
0323031 HORL, THERESA
0323032 H 0 K DESIGN + BUILD, INC
0323033 HOME REPAIRS & REMODELING
0323034 HYATT REGENCY MILWAUKEE
0323035 INTELISOLVE
0323036 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
0323037 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
0323038 INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER
0323039 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
0323040 IZOD CLUB
0323041 INNOVATIVE NETWORK SYSTEMS
0323042 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
0323043 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE -
0323044 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY
0323045 IMI -NET, INC
0323046
0323047
0323048
0323049
0323050
0323051
0323052
0323053
MAY 21, 2002
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
INDIAN RIVER HAND REHAB INC
JOHNSTON, RODNEY
JAMES SMALLEY UTILITY SHEDS
JONES & JONES
JIMMY'S A/C & REFRIGERATION
JONES, ELVIN JR
JANNACH PROPERTIES LTD
-8-
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
210.00
165.00
30.00
47.36
3,475.00
621.00
122.60
38.25
878.20
74.00
98.46
310.00
375.00
36.00
224.42
268.69
500.00
3,013.62
63.98
510.60
58.00
8,178.87
19,018.03
20.00
59.00
52.54
269.50
187.02
1,736.00
2,000.00
238.38
841.00
269.85
8,645.28
8,568.15
500.00
6,250.00
376.07
287.00
116,760.06
82.40
53.20
10.00
109,951.11
70.00
345.00
910.00
75.00
3,374.71
200.00
12.50
208.28
675.00
9.44
277,418.85
4,999.98
450.00
275.94
819.16
177.41
4,999.99
250.00
75.00
126.18
3,900.00
or
•
0323054 JULIAN, ROBERT
0323055 KLUCINEC, MONA
0323056 KURTZ, ERIC C MD
0323057 KOUNS, DARLENE
0323058 K S M ENGINEERING
0323059 KNOWLES, CYRIL
0323060 KRISS, HOLDEN E
0323061 KUESTERSTEFFEN, MIKE
0323062 KAPPA, JORGE
0323063 JENKINS, RENOLA H
0323064 KENNEDY, IVA
0323065 KENNEDY,ESQ.JOHN T
0323066 KIRBY, WILLIAM
0323067 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
0323068 LEWIS, RUTH A
0323069 LABOR FINDERS
0323070 L J RUFFIN & ASSOC
0323071 LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO
0323072 LUNA, JUVENAL
0323073 MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL
0323074 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO
0323075 MIAMI HERALD, THE
0323076 MADD
0323077 MAC PAPERS, INC
0323078 MCCLEARY, MILDRED
0323079 MEDCHECK
0323080 MAYR, SHARON
0323081
0323082
0323083
0323084
0323085
0323086
0323087
0323088
0323089
0323090
0323091
& TESTING
0323092
0323093
0323094
0323095
0323096
032309
032309
032309
032310
032310
032310
032310
032310
0323105
0323106
0323107
0323108
0323109
0323110
0323111
0323112
0323113
0323114
0323115
0323116
0323117
0323118
MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE
MGB CONSTRUCTION INC
MARTIN, CRISTI
METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC
MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES, INC
MALLAMS, JOHN H, PHD
MONTEJO, EDWARD MD
MEDICAID AMBULANCE
MCCREARY CORPORATION
MATTENINI, GEORGE
MORRISON, GAYE S
MAXFLI GOLF
MOLLOY, CATHERINE
MADDENS, FAWN
O,CONNOR, CHARLES M
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
7 NATIONAL DIRECTORY OF CHILDREN
8 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
9 NU CO 2, INC
0 NEOPOST
1 NORTHSIDE AGAPE MINISTRIES
2 NORTHROP GRUMMAN COMMERCIAL
3 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
4 ON IT'S WAY
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
OFFICE DEPOT
ORGANIC MILLING CO
PALM BEACH NEWSPAPER, INC
PARKS RENTAL INC
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PUBLIC DEFENDER
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
P B S & J
PETTY CASH
MAY 21, 2002
-9-
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-0509
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-.09
2002-05-09
500.00
44.68
118.00
115.88
170.00
1,039.84
143.84
105.00
20.50
52.90
52.90
3,000.00
500.00
451.43
44.34
4,034.41
513.24
2,029.64
318.50
20.00
8,149.20
71.75
50.00
130.60
414.96
523.59
202.59
270.00
1,500.00
80.50
1,340.10
17.37
80.75
104.00
225.88
104.48
52.54
26.87
896.40
28.91
70.00
25.00
512.58
125.00
227.97
17.85
145.00
5'-241.54
5,330.00
142.03
1,029.88
4,778.22
693.57
30.00
123.04
59.33
260.00
63.09
190.48
79.31
161.97
3,814.08
181,606.61
4,100.00
198.88
•
0323119 PORT CONSOLIDATED
0323120 PLEZALL WIPERS, INC
0323121 PATRICK EXTERMINATING, INC
0323122 PRIDGEON, RODGER DBA
0323123 PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE
0323124 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
0323125 PRESS JOURNAL
0323126 PIONEER SCREEN CO INC II
0323127 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES, INC
0323128 PHELPS, PAMELA G
0323129 PERSONNEL PLUS INC
0323130 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING SVC
0323131 P B S & J
0323132 PESHA, JESSICA
0323133 PICKERING, REBECCA LMT
0323134 PARKER, TRAVIS
0323135 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
0323136 PARKS AND SONS INC
0323137 RINKER MATERIALS
0323138 RECORDED BOORS, LLC
0323139 R & G SOD FARMS
0323140 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
0323141 ROYAL CUP COFFEE
0323142 RAPP, PAMELA
0323143 REXEL CONSOLIDATED
0323144 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
0323145 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
0323146 RICHARD ZORC & SONS BUILDERS
0323147 R S MEDICAL
0323148 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES BREVARD
0323149 RIZIO, HOWARD
0323150 RIVERSIDE SURGERY CENTER
0323151 REGENCY REPORTING, INC
0323152 SCHOPP, BARBARA G
0323153 SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
0323154 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
0323155 SMART CORPORATION
0323156 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
0323157 REXEL SOUTHERN
0323158 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE, INC
0323159 STANDARD & POOR'S
0323160 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
0323161 SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
0323162 SUNRISE TRACTOR & EQUIPMNT INC
0323163 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
0323164 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO, INC
0323165 STRUNK FUNERAL HOME
0323166 SAFESPACE INC
0323167 SEMBLER, CHARLES W
0323168 SALEM PRESS, INC
0323169 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
0323170 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
0323171 SEXTON, HILDY
0323172 SPALDING
0323173 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
0323174 SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
0323175 SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
0323176 STAGE & SCREEN
0323177 SUNTRUST BANK
0323178 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE
0323179 SCHOLASTIC SPORTS INC
0323180 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
0323181 SINES CONSTRUCTION CO INC
0323182 SPEIRS, DONNA
0323183 SPACE COAST PATHOLOGISTS
MAY 21, 2002
-10-
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
PV
17,961.94
121.25
95.00
500.00
121.60
251.04
133.35
30.00
500.00
260.00
1,140.00
1,279.53
18,876.00
38.63
144.00
48.00
80.00
1,247.50
12,416.47
843.20
160.00
177.10
241.56
24.00
357.34
230.17
461.10
1,000.00
=64.00
56.00
420.98
1,995.00
224.60
66.50
1,308.94
78.84
6.80
1,110.50
55.61
236.57
2,617.84
83.05
24.21
21.85
60.00
526.18
1,100.00
2,115.38
117.55
424.20
55.00
5,609.55
80.00
1,264.70
1,374.20
1,062.91
9,901.67
50.46
139.11
194.56
59.50
50.00
500.00
98.00
6.00
• .
0323184
0323185
0323186
0323187
0323188
0323189
0323190
0323191
0323192
0323193
0323194
0323195
0323196
0323197
0323198
0323199
0323200
0323201
0323202
0323203
0323204
0323205
0323206
0323207
0323208
0323209
0323210
0323211
0323212
0323213
0323214
0323215
0323216
0323217
0323218
0323219
0323220
0323221
0323222
0323223
0323224
0323225
0323226
0323227
0323228
0323229
0323230
0323231
0323232
0323233
0323234
0323235
0323236
0323237
0323238
0323239
0323240
0323241
0323242
0323243
0323244
0323245
0323246
0323247
0323248
MAY 21, 2002
ST HELENS CATHOLIC CHURCH
STORAGE SOLUTIONS
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS
SEMBLER, CHARLES W
SUN CONTAINER INC
SERRA, RACHEL
SUNNYTECH INC- FL
STEPHENS, LARRY
SVI SYSTEMS INC
SMITH, VANCE
STATE ATTORNEY ACCOUNT
SCHMITZ, BRIAN
STELZ, RAY
TIPPIN, JOHN W
TECHNICALRESCUE.COM INC
TREASURE COAST BUILDERS INC
TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FL
TY COBB SERVICES INC
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP
TURF MASTER TRACTOR AND MOWER
TRICARE REGION E
TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC
TRIVIGNO,.PETER
TESTAMERICA INC
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
UNIVERSITY PRESS OF FLA
ULVERSCROFT LARGE PRINT
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
UNITED BLOWER, INC
UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL,INC
UNISHIPPERS
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
URGENT CARE WEST
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VIRGIL'S RADIATOR WORKS
VERO MARINE CENTER, INC
VERO RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES
VERO ORTHOPAEDICS
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
VERO BEARING & BOLT
VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN
VERO COLLISION CENTER
VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN
WAL-MART
WALSH, LYNN
WILSON'S PETROLEUM EQ INC
WOLSTENHOLME, SHIRLEY
WOODY'S PRINTING
W W GRAINGER, INC
WILLHOFF, PATSY
WILLIAM THIES & SONS, INC
WILSON, MARGARET F
WAUSAU
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WEISS & NEWBERRY MEDICAL ASSOC
WALGREEN COMPANY
WOMEN'S GOLF UNLIMITED
WOODS, DANIEL
WYNDHAM ORLANDO RESORT
WESTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
XEROX CORPORATION
-11-
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
281.96
213.37
281.00
94.68
1,269.88
38.63
296.36
280.00
45.00
= 52.57
1,425.00
580.00
281.04
74.45
2,848.96
500.00
126.52
110.00
584.60
2,546.85
1,958.00
610.28
387.52
150.64
54.21
279.00
3,884.25
81.93
651.45
480.00
62,459.95
88.76
5,033.82
61.34
15.08
723.00
51,181.57
1,146.99
60.00
16.30
47.00
838.88
50.00
258.47
102.00
1,128.00
3,527.05
1,076.57
26.68
258.90
42.80
590.50
199.20
130.00
742.80
130.50
51.26
494.07
305.70
1,758.43
59.88
491.70
214.00
500.00
695.59
[1 S *4
J1t, 4
032324
032325
032325
032325
032325
032325
032325
032325
032325
032325
032325
0323260
0323261
0323262
0323263
0323264
0323265
0323266
0323267
0323268
0323269
0323270
0323271
0323272
0323273
0323274
0323275
9 YAVORSRY'S TRUCK SERVICE, INC
0 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
1 MC NEAL, PATRICK
2 HILLERY, DORIS
3 MILLER, JOSEPH
4 ANGELONE, RANIERO
5 WODTKE, RUSSELL
6 LICARI, LINDA
7 LAUER, RAYMOND
8 ROYAL, THOMAS
9 GERRY, RAYMOND
GELD, TONIA
AMERITREND HOMES
BIG AND BEAUTIFUL
SILKEN GROUP
BURGOON BERGER
BURGOON AND BERGER
CHANNING CORP
CHANNING CORP
DJ OF IRC INC
FIRST FL DEV AND CONSTRUCTION
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
IRC
KELLY CONSTRUCTION
MCDONALD PROPERTIES
MGB CONSTRUCTION
ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES
0323276
0323277
0323278
0323279
0323280
0323281
0323282
0323283
0323284
0323285
0323286
0323287
0323288
0323289
0323290
0323291
0323292
0323293
0323294
0323295
0323296
0323297
0323298
0323299
0323300
0323301
0323302
0323303
0323304
0323305
0323306
0323307
0323308
0323309
0323310 D
0323311 E
0323312 C
0323313 G
PASSAGE ISLE HOMES INX
SEA OARS INVESTMENT
SEA OAKS INVESTMENT
ALBRECHT, ROBERT &
BEATY, DON
COLON, SPRING
CORDEIRO, ARTHUR
COX, JEAN
ELLWOOD, JOHN
FUENTES, URBANO
HARTLESS, GEORGE
KIM, YOUNG SOO
JOHN JR., KOWALSKI
LEBRECHT, CLINTON
MAGNIFICO, PETER
PALESTRINI, PAUL
PERRY, WILLIAM
RAYMOND, JAMES
REESE, HAZEL
THOMAS, ALAN AND
WOO, SAMMY
TOZZOLO BROTHERS
ESTATE OF WILLIE REESE
HART, CELIA
BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
RUSSO, JOHN
BURGOON BERGER CONST CO
LAWRENCE, CRAIG
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
MERRILL, CRAIG AND
CEMCO
REED, TAMARA
JOHNSON, SHARON
CUETO JR, ANTHONY
IETRICH, TRICIA JAHOLROWSKI
TIENNE, AIGNER
OLANDREA, JAMES A
HO VERO BEACH INC
MAY 21, 2002
-12-
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
385.37
79.57
179.82
827.44
454.52
950.40
295.97
476.80
571.00
641.26
783.76
444.00
34.23
16.41
42.69
66.93
31.78
180.74
64.65
26.41
197.03
26.41
26.41
34.74
41.78
31.78
9.59
26.41
41.78
69.23
26.85
50.00
61.35
14.26.
30.64
21.38
76.73
42.78
42.48
26.41
11.93
6.20
56.02
31.14
9.59
105.36
4.70
17.57
34.68
41.78
20.41
87.80
46.49
72.05
8.29
160.90
33.28
4.65
13.61
48.88
1.14
50.32
77.87
40.20
43.01
• •
0323314
0323315
0323316
0323317
0323318
0323319
0323320
0323321
0323322
0323323
0323324
0323325
0323326
0323327
0323328
0323329
0323330
0323331
0323332
0323333
0323334
0323335
0323336
0323337
0323338
0323339
0323340
0323341
0323342
MIDRIFF, STEVE AND
LESTER, MICHAEL R
KEHLENBECK, ROBERT
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
FITZSIMONS III, BERNARD F
DILLON, GARY
ELLERMAN, KEITH
RUSS, RAYMOND
LAKAS, CECELIA A
LURIA IMPROVEMENTS LLC
MORRIS, RICHARD W
HAMILTON PLACE INC
TCIMPIDIS, DAVID AND
CHORA, PAULA J
RICCI, KATHY
HAEGER, SANDRA
BAGELS PLUS
ERSIK, MICHAEL
TRI SURE CORP
MAHER, CATHERINE T
CELTIC CONTACTS INC
WHITFIELD, SHANNON
SWEDO, ROBERTA R
BOWMAN, JOHANN
CHAMBERS POA, DONALD J
MALDONADO, MICHELLE ANN
HUBERT ENTERPRISES
YORK, ARTHUR
AUSBY, DONNIE
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
48.71
82.66
89.76
100.00
41.28
19.07
52.18
39.18
21.28
155.37
32.86
45.43
9.10
63.59
74.17
79.03
22.95
64.64
345.00
17.21
36.32
68.94
33.80
72.58
48.66
25.37
50.00
32.72
28.72
1,884,137.66
7.B. GHA RIVER VILLAGE, INC. - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR RIVER
VILLAGE - GRAND HARBOR PLAT 26 (QUASI-JUDICIAL)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 13, 2002:
TO:
James E. Chandler; County Administrator
TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
obert M. eating, AI P; omrnunity 1 velopment Director
11
THROUGH: Stan Boling,AICP; Planning Direct
FROM: Peter J. Radke; Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: May 13, 2002
SUBJECT: GHA River Village, Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval for River Village —
Grand Harbor Plat 26
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2002.
MAY 21, 2002
-13-
1
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
Grand Harbor Plat 26 is a subdivision of a 26.84 -acre parcel into 16 single-family lots, a multi-
family tract (84 units), and a number of other tracts that will be used for various uses including
landscaping stormwater management, conservation, and recreation. The subject property is part
of the overall Grand Harbor Planned Development (PD) and is consistent with the Grand Harbor
conceptual PD plan. The subject site is located in the southeast portion of the overall Grand
Harbor development, is zoned RM -6, and has an M-1 land use designation
On September 14, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary PD plan/plat
approval for Grand Harbor Plat 26. The applicant has subsequently obtained a land development
permit and commenced construction of the project. The applicant is proposing to ' bond -out" for
completion of the remaining required improvements as allowed by the land development
regulations (LDRs). Now, the applicant is requesting fmal plat approval and has submitted the
following:
1. A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary PD plan/plat;
2. An Engineers Certified Cost Estimate for the remaining required improvements;
3. A completed Contract for Construction of remaining required improvements; and
4. A Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement to guarantee the Contract.
ANALYSIS:
All of the required subdivision improvements have been completed except for one sidewalk
segment The applicant is proposing to "bond -out" for that sidewalk segment as provided for in
the county's LDRs. Public Works has reviewed and approved the submitted Engineer's Certified
Cost Estimate and corresponding cash escrow amount. The County Attorney's Office has
reviewed and approved the submitted Contract for Construction. The cash escrow which
represents 115% of the estimated cost to construct the remaining sidewalk segment, has been
submitted. It should be noted that all improvements within the Grand Harbor development will
be private, with the exception of certain utilities facilities that will be dedicated and guaranteed
to Indian River County as required by the Utility Services Department.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for Grand Harbor Plat 26 and authorize the Chairman to execute the submitted
Contract for Construction of remaining required improvements and the Cash Deposit and Escrow
Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Plat Layout
4. Contract for Construction (Draft)
5. Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement (Draft)
MAY 21, 2002
-14-
• •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously granted final plat approval for Grand
Harbor Plat 26 and authorized the Chairman to
execute the Contract for Construction of Remaining
Required Improvements and the Cash Deposit and
Escrow Agreement, as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTATION IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. C. KENNEDY GROVES, INC. - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR OLD ORCHID
PHASE III SUBDIVISION (QUASI-JUDICIAL)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 14, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
AD CONCURRENCE:
ert M. eating, AICP
Community Development Dire
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
z
FROM: Mark Zans �'
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: May 14, 2002
SUBJECT: Kennedy Groves, Inc. Request for Final Plat Approval for Old Orchid Phase III
Subdivision
MAY 21, 2002
-15-
0 '
ri
d
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Old Orchid Phase III subdivision is a 30 lot, 7.28 acre portion of the four phase Old Orchid P.D
(Planned Development) project. Located on the north side of CR 510 and east of Jungle Trail, the
property is zoned PD and has a L-2 land use designation [low density 2 up to 6 units per acre] The
density of the Phase III subdivision is 4 25 units per acre. The first two phases of Old Orchid PD
have been platted. Phase I has been completed and Phase II has been partially built out. The roads
and stormwater management system withm Phase II are being extended into Phase III to serve the
Phase III lots.
At its regular meeting of May 5, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Old Orchid
Conceptual PD plan for all four phases. Subsequently, on January 24, 2002, the Planning and Zoning
Commission granted preliminary PD plan/plat approval for Old Orchid Phase III. The developer has
obtained a land development permit and has constructed some of the Phase III required
improvements. Now, the developer is requesting final plat approval for Phase III and has submitted
the following:
1.A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary PD plat / plan.
2. A certified cost estimate for the remaining required Phase III subdivision improvements.
3. A copy of a contract for construction for the remaining required improvements.
EM
4. A security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction.
The Board is now to grant final plat approval.
ANALYSIS:
Some of the required Phase III subdivision improvements have been completed, and the developer
proposes to bond -out for construction of the remaining required improvements to proceed with final
plat approval. The format of the final plat and the financial security have been approved by the
County Attorney's Office, and unit cost for construction items have been approved by Public Works,
Utility Services, and the Planning Division The developer has also submitted a copy of the Contract
for Construction of Required Improvements All subdivision improvements are privately dedicated
with the exception of the utility system, which will be separately warranted through the Department
of Utility Services. Based on submission of the previously referenced contract and security, all
requirements of final plat approval are satisfied. -
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant final
plat approval for Old Orchid Phase III subdivision, and authorize the Chairman to execute the
contract and any security documents and accept the security.
MAY 21, 2002
-16-
• •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously granted final plat approval for Old
Orchid Phase III Subdivision and authorized the
Chairman to execute the contract and any security
documents and accept the security, as recommended
by staff.
DOCUMENTATION- ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WH
7.D. BID #4060 - PORTABLE TRAILER MOUNTED GENERATOR (UTILITIES) -
ALTERNATIVE POWER SOURCES, LLC
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 8, 2002:
DATE: May 8, 2002
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services, Director
Erik Olson, Utilities Department, Director
FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manage> ia,,< fie
wit
SUBJECT: IRC Bid # 4060 Portable Trailer Mounted Generator
Utilities Department
MAY 21, 2002
-17-
uA
BACKGROUND:
The Utilities Department has requested the purchase of a portable trailer mounted generator for
the South County Water Plant. This generator will be used to supply power to the wells at the
plant in the event of a power outage. The bid results are as follows:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates*
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specification s requested by:
Replies:
BID TABULATION:
April 24, 2002
April 10 and 17, 2002
Two Hundred Eighty Seven (287) vendors
Forty -One (41) vendors
Seven (7) vendors
1.
3.
Vendor
Alternative Power Sources LLC
Plant City, FL
Standby Systems Inc
Melbourne, FL
CJ's Sales and Service
Ocala, FL
Amount
Delivery
Time
$50,634.00 I 49 days
$57,325.00 I 84-112 days
4 NextGen Power Systems of New Jersey Inc
Hamilton, NJ
5 TAW Power Systems
Pompano Beach, FL
6 Florida Detroit Diesel - Allison
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
$61,161.00 I 60 days
$69,995.00 I 100 days
$70,395.00 I 84 days
$84,560.00
90 days
Walker Miller Equipment Co Inc
Orlando FL
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMMENDATION:
$92,380.00
45-60 days
$105,000.00
$50,634.00
471-219-536-066.49
Utilities - Capital Heavy Equipment
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Alternative Power Sources LLC as the lowest
most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to
Bid.
MAY 21, 2002
.
-18-, rrn
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #4060 to Alternative
Power Sources, LLC in the amount of $50,634, as
recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. E. PROCLAMATION HONORING MA ,JAYA SATI BHA GAVATI
Commissioner Ginn stated that she could not support this Proclamation.
PROCLAMATION
HONORING
MA JAYA SATI BHAGAVATI
WHEREAS, Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati is an internationally respected spiritual
leader, teacher and founder of the Kashi Foundation; and
WHEREAS, Kashi is an interfaith spiritual community that embraces the sacred
practices of many traditions, with the ministry and teachings based upon a commitment
to humanity through service; and
WHEREAS, Ma Jaya is known not only for her compassionate-- work with death
and dying and caring for those in need but also for her advocacy of human rights,
religious freedom and equality, and it is through this commitment to humanity that the
River Fund and the River School were born; and
MAY 21, 2002
D:(
•
WHEREAS, Kashi provides a sacred environment for the individual pursuit of
spiritual enlightenment the River Fund is dedicated to serving people throughout the
world with AIDS and other life challenging illnesses, and the River School provides its
PreK — 12 students with an environment that weaves spirituality, service and
awareness into a quality education; and
WHEREAS, Ma Jaya is a Trustee of the Parliament of the World s Religions and a
member of the United Religions Initiative, and is working with other religious and
spiritual leaders to promote interfaith dialogue and global cooperation for peace. In
1997, Ma Jaya established World Tibet Day to raise awareness of the plight of the
Tibetan people and support for international freedom of religion for everyone.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board recognizes the
accomplishments of Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati on the 25th Anniversary of Kashi Ashram.
Adopted this 21st day of May, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Ruth M. Stanbndge, Ch man
MAY 21, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board,
by a 3-2 vote (Commissioners Ginn and Tippin
opposed), accepted the Proclamation for the record.
-20-
•
7. F. ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING - FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 -
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT - MULTI -AGENCY
DRUG ENFORCEMENT UNIT (MACE) - PREVENT (SUBSTANCE ABUSE
COUNCIL)- SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 14, 2002:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: May 14, 2002
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003
ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING
THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Jason E Brown
Budget Manager
BACKGROUND
For the past twelve fiscal years, Indian River County has been allocated grant funds from the Flonda
Department of Law Enforcement to fund local anti-drug abuse programs. The Board has funded the
following programs the past two years:
Agency
1. Mufti -Agency Drug Enforcement
Unit (M.A.C.E.)
2. PREVENT (Substance Abuse
Council
Implementing
Agency
2000/2001
2001/2002
IRC Sheriff
$120,480
$110,838
3. Substance Abuse Council of IRC
Indian River County
Indian River County
TOTAL
$ 68,844
$ 21,036
$210,360
$ 62,234
$ 19,230
$192,302
The County received a letter dated March 11, 2002 from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement
(FDLE) stating that Indian River County has been allocated $159,323 in federal grant funds for FY
2002/2003, to fund local anti-drug abuse programs. This amount is an increase from the previous year
when Indian River County received $144,226 in federal funds. The letter also requested that the Board
serve as the coordinating unit of government in applying for the funds. At the commission meeting on
April 2, 2002,.the Board accepted the invitation to serve as the coordinating unit of government and
named Jason E. Brown, Budget Manager, as the contact person.
MAY 21, 2002
-21-
EJ A
1
•
PROPOSED FUNDING FOR FY 2002/2003
The Substance Abuse Council Advisory Board recommended three (3) programs as listed below:
Programs to be Funded
Multi -Agency Drug
Enforcement Unit
(M A.C.E.)
PREVENT (Substance
Abuse Council)
Substance Abuse Council
of Indian River County
Implementing
Agency
State Share
75%
Matching
25%
Total
IRC Sheriff Dept.
$ 89,129
$29,710
$118,839
Indian River County
$ 54,262
$18,087
$ 72,349
Indian River County
$ 15,932
$ 5,311
$ 21,243
TOTAL I $159,323 I $53,107 $212,430 1
(Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest dollar. This results in a rounding difference for the total.)
The grand total of all three projects is $212,430.00 If a project cannot be implemented due to the
budget cuts, then the money allocated for the project will be redistributed to other projects already
listed.
The M A C E Unit, Substance Abuse Council and PREVENT all receive their match from Indian
River County Board of Commission funds since they are agencies of the County.
Copies of the grant applications are on file in the Board of County Commissioners office and the
Budget Office for review.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Substance Abuse Council's
recommendations and authonze the Board Chairman to sign the grant applications and other necessary
related documents for submittal to the state by the deadline of Tuesday, June 4, 2002.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously approved the Substance Abuse
Council's recommendations and authorized the
Chairman to sign the grant applications and other
necessary related documents for submittal to the
State by the deadline of Tuesday, June 4, 2002, as
recommended by staff.
MAY 21, 2002
DOCUMENTATION IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
-22-
•
7. G. JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - REVISED
CHANGE ORDER #1 - SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 13, 2002:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
CONSENT
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P E , Public Works Director
FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Enginee
SUBJECT: Jungle Trail/Pelican island Wildlife Refuge — • SED CHANGE ORDER
NO. 1 for Summit Construction Management, Inc.
REFERENCE: IRC Project No. 9724
DATE: May 13, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On May 7, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved Change Order No. 1 to the contract
for Summit Construction Management, Inc for an increase in the contract amount of $11 181.68 for
824 1.f. of 6" force main for the proposed facilities for the Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife
Refuge project
The Change Order No. 1, approved on May 7, 2002, shows an Original Contract Price of
$1,214 911.21. This figure incorrectly includes costs for related services including house moving
and archeological services not included in the contract with Summit Construction Management, Inc.
The original contract amount for Summit Construction Management, Inc. is $1,203,061.21.
Revised Change Order No. 1 to the contract reflects the addition of the 6" force mam along SRA -1-
A. The total additional cost is $11,181.68 and no additional time will be added to the contract.
Current Contract Price including all Revised Change Order No 1 is $1,214,242 89.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1. Funding to be from the Pelican Park Force Main
(Jungle Trail FM) account number 472-000-169-511.
MAY 21, 2002
Y 21,
ri
1
•
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously approved Revised Change Order #1
with Summit Construction Management, Inc.
reflecting the addition of the 6" force main along SR
A -1-A fora total additional cost of $11,181.68 for
a total contract price of $1,214,242.89, as
recommended by staff.
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. H. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT #012
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 13, 2002:
To: Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
Through: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
From. Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Date: May 13, 2002
Subject: Miscellaneous
Budget Amendment 012
Description and Conditions
The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following.
1. Each year Indian River County pays for its portion of the cost of the annual Florida Inland
Navigation District (F.I.N.D.) Banquet. The attached entry appropriates $200 from General
Fund Contingencies.
MAY 21, 2002
-24-
•
2. During a special meeting on February 1, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved a 3%
Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for members of the firefighters' collective bargaining unit.
This increase became effective on February 1, 2002. The attached entry appropriates funding
from Emergency Services District contingencies.
3. On May 15, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved a Flonda Inland Navigion
(FIND) Waterways Assistance Program grant for the purchase of a patrol and es
cue Dvessel
for ro
ided
50%
match. the Sheriff's rt The required match ($34,478) is ment. This ratpprovided fbyuntlhe Sheriffs Law ng of $34,478 'Enfor eth a gmenuiret Trust
Fund
4. Emergency Services did not expend all Radiological Emergency Preparedness t funds for
the 2000/01 fiscal year. At the end of the fiscal year $25,998 in funds remained In
accordance with the grant, these funds can be rolled forward to the current year. The attached
entry appropriates funding.
5. On April 23, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved funding for modular office space and
office furniture for the Supervisor of Elections. The attached entry appropnates funding from
General Fund contingencies in the amount of $248,615.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget
Amendment #012, as recommended by staff.
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
From: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Budget Amendment: 012
Date: May 21, 2002
MAY 21, 2002
-25-
•
Entry
Number
Fund/ DepVent/
Account e
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
Expenses
General Fund/ Board of
Commissioners/ Oth Professional
001-101-511-033.19
$200
$0
General Fund/ Reserve for
Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$200
MAY 21, 2002
-25-
•
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
From: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Entry
Number
Fund/ De.: `. ent/
Account 'ame
Account Number
Budget Amendment: 012
Date: May 21, 2002
Increase
Decrease
Expenses
Emergency Services District/ Fire
Services/ Re. ular Salaries
Emergency Services Distnct/ Fire
Services/ Overtime
Emergency Services District/ Fire
Services/ Social Securi
Emergency Services District/ Fire
Services/ Retirement Contribution
Emergency Services District/ Fire
Services/ Worker's Com.ensation
Emergency Services Distnct/ Fire
Services/ Life Insurance
Emergency Services District/ Fire
Services/ Medicare Matchin.
Emergency Services District/ Fire
Services/ Contin.encies
114-120-522-011.12
$95,918
114-120-522-011.14
114-120-522-012.11
114-120-522-012.12
$19,014
114-120-522-012.14
114-120-522-012.13
114-120-522-012.17
114-120-522-099.91
$136,068
Law Enforcement Trust Fund/
Confiscated Prose
Law Enforcement Trust Fund/
FIND Waterwa Assistance Pro..
Expenses
112-000-351-020.00
112-000-334-077.00
$34,478
112-600-521-066.49
$68,956
001-000-389-040.00
Expenses
$25,998
001-237-525-033.49
$25,998
Expenses
General Fund/ Buildings &
Grounds/ Rent — Other E. ui. ment
General Fund/ Buildings &
Grounds/ Buildin. Alterations
General Fund/ Buildings &
Grounds/ Office Furniture
General Fund/ Reserve for
Contin.encies
001-220-519-034.49
001-220-519-041.25
$190,215
001-220-519-066.41
$36,000
MAY 21, 2002
001-199-581-099.91
-26-
$248,615
•
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 2002-020 AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING
ZONING MAP FOR 13.94 ACRES LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF 26TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 400
FEET WEST OF 66TH AVENUE FROM A-1 TO RM -6
(JAMES AND LORA ADAMSON) (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 13, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
DEP MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Ro ' ert M. Keating, AICP; CP; Cmm unity velopment Director
THROUGH• Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning '4
FROM: Randy Deshazo; Planner, Long -Range Planningi39
DATE: May 13, 2002
RE• Adamson request to rezone ±13.94 acres from A-1 to R.M-6
(RZON 2002-03-0099)
It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This is a request to rezone 13.94 acres from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres), to RM -
6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre). Located on 26th Street, the subject
property is approximately 400 feet west of 66th Avenue. The purpose of this request is to secure the
zoning necessary to develop the site at a density consistent with its L-2 comprehensive plan land use
designation.
On April 25, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve the request to rezone the subject property.
MAY 21, 2002
-27-
D ter
U %
1
•
Existing Land Use Pattern
Generally, this area of the county contains a mix of agricultural and residential uses. The subject
property, which contains a citrus grove, is zoned A-1. The two adjacent properties on the west,
which contain rangelands and woodlands, are also zoned A-1. Further west of the subject property,
along 26th Street, are the RM -6 zoned Walker Avenue Club Apartments and the RMH-8 zoned,
Mobile Home Residential District (up to 8 units/acre), Village Green Mobile Home Park. The land
to the east is zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).
Figure: Location and Zoning of the Subject Property
MAY 21, 2002
-28-
•
Immediately to the north, a 20 acre parcel is zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to
6 units/acre). The Vista Plantation Condominiums, zoned RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential
District (up to 4 units/acre), are to the south of the subject property,
East of th
Vista Plantation Condominiums, across 66th Avenue, is the Indian River Mall, zonedtGenerale Gene e
Commercial.
Future Land Use Pattern
Land along the north side of 26`h Street, including the entire subject property, is designated L-2,
Low -Density Residential -2, on the county Future Land Use Map. The L-2 desi atione
residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. Land abutting the northwest comer of the site is
designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, on the county Future Land Use Ma
designation permits residential uses with densities up to 3 units/acre. Land to the south of the
subject property, along the south side of26t Street, is designated M-1, Medium -Density Residential -
1, on the county future land use map. The M-1 designation permits residential uses with densities
up to 8 units/acre The Indian River Mall is designated RC, Regional Commercial, on the county
Future Land Use Map. The RC designation permits regional malls and associated retail shopping
centers designed to serve markets beyond the county boundaries.
Environment
Being a citrus grove, the subject property is an altered site. The subject property is not designated
as environmentally important nor environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan. No
wetlands or native upland habitat exists on the site. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the
subject property does not contain any flood hazard areas.
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. Wastewater service is available to the site
from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water service is available to
the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant
Transportation System
The property s south boundary abuts 26th Street. Classified as a collector road on the future roadway
thoroughfare plan map, this segment of26t Street is a 2 -lane paved road with approximately 60 feet
of existing public road right-of-way. This segment of 26 Street is currently planned for expansion
to 80 feet of public road nght-of-way by 2020.
ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented.
Specifically, this section will include:
• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan,
• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area, and
• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
MAY 21, 2002
-29-
P"
J!i
•
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is located within the county urban service area, an area deemed suited for urban
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management and Parks and Recreation, scale
provision of these services is necessarynsureWater,
equate
community The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development the Re continued quality of life enjoyed re tthe
hat
new development be reviewed to ensure that the
and facilities are maintained.
minimum accepablelstand standardsons forors) lthese so gse e that
services
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required.
P P PP ed unless it
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity P ty of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezonings
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense projects,are not e of the subject pro e
county regulations call for the
requested zoning. For residential rezoningproperty based upon the
LDRs) is the maximum number of unitat could be uiests, the l tonst lthe site,ntense lgiven the sse ize to of the
and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. County's
analysis is as follows: g The site information used for the con property
concurrency
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 13.94 acres
2. Existing Zoning District:
3. Proposed Zoning District:
A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acres)
4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning District:
2 Single -Family Units
5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District:
83 Multiple -Family Units
Trans Trans neon
As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Statement
(TIS). The county's Traffic Engineering C Division has reviewed and approved that TIS. A TIS
reports the number of peak aur/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district, and assi
to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4gns those trips
))3 ofe county's LDRs as
roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more
project trips, whichever is less.
According to the approved TIS the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 83 multiple -family units on the subject property.
Water
With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 83 residential units, resulting
n water consumption at a rate of 83 Equivalent Residential Units(ERU)° or 20,
This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/da elo gallons/day.
ment on the
subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant which currntly has
a remaining capacity of approximately 3,900,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional
demand generated by the proposed rezoning.
MAY 21, 2002
-30-
•
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning development of the property
will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 83 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU),
or 20,750 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250 gallons/ERU/day.
County wastewater service is available to the site from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 1,100,000 gallons/day and can
accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request.
Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The
county's adopted level ofservice standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year With
the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 83 unit residential development would be
anticipated to house approximately 190 people (2.3 X 83). For the subject request to meet the
county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have
enough capacity to acconunodate approximately 374.3 (190 X 1.97) cubic yards/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year
capacity and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed zoning district.
Stormwater Management
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of flood plain storage and minimum finished floor elevations In
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater
Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian
River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited
from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the
approved IRFWCD discharge rate.
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property
does not lie within a flood plain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply.
Based upon staffs analysis, the stormwater management level of service standard would be met by
limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD s maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four
hours, and requiring retention of 253,404 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the
property.
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval
process.
Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most
intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates
that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the additional
park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus
acreage.
Park Information
LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) I Project Demand (Acres) I Surplus Acreage
MAY 21, 2002
4.0
-31-
0.76 I 1,164
•
Concurrency Summa
Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined
including the aateronductmanagement, roads, solid waste, that all concurrency -mandated adequate capacity to accod mmodate Y mandated facilities,
P ty mmodate the most intense use of the sub subwject d wastewater
proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request.
� property under the
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all appropriate policies of the comprehensive
plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation
Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, ofland uses as depicted on the
commercial and industrial land uses and thdensities. Commercial residential, cand industrial land ureation, ses aree
located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the cous of nty nt comprehensive n order plan. direct
he
community s development. As courses of action co will take in top direct the
basis for all county land development decisions. committed l by the county, policies provide the
important, some have more applicabilitysWhile all comprehensive plan policies are
applicability for this request are the following objectives rand policies.n omng requests. Of particular
Future Land Use Element Ob ective 1
Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern
which reduces urban sprawl. By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent with
the site's land use designation, the request promotes a more compact land use pattern within the
urban service area and reduces the chance of urban sprawl occurring. For these reasons, the request
is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1.
Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 12 states that the L-2, Low -Density
designation is intended for residential uses with densities upto 6 ts/acre. In addition, Residential -2, land Landuse
Future
Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within theurban service
area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the coup
Use map and is located within the county's urban service area h's Frig d Land
and the
would permit residential uses no greater than the 6 units/acre proposed zoning district
request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12.permitted by the L-2 designation, the
Future Land Use Element Folic 2.2
Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth
the urban service area through zoning and LDRs Since the proposed rezoning would allow and
encourage more development on the subject property, and the subject prope
service area, the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2is within the urban
Future Land Use Element Obiective 4
Future Land Use Element Objective 4 states that the county will reduce the number and length of
trips on county roads. The site is located near several employment centers, including the Vero Beach
Municipal Airport, Dodgertown, and the SR 60/58th Avenue commercial/industrial node. That node
MAY 21, 2002
-32-
nu
Li!
•
is one of the county's largest employment centers. Most people who work in that node live in
moderately -priced, low to medium density housing. The RM -6 zoning district is intended for such
housing. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will increase the opportunity for people who work in that
node to live near their job, thus reducing the length of their trips to and from work. For this reason,
the request implements Future Land Use Element Objective 4.
Transportation Element Obiechve 11 and Policy 11.1
Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 state that the county will increase densities in
the urbanized area and along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass transit
provision. Since the proposed rezoning will increase the allowed density along and near several
major transportation corridors this request implements Transportation Element Objective 11 and
Policy 11.1
Consistency Summary
As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all appropriate objectives
and policies in the plan and found no conflicts Therefore, staff's position is that the request is
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
Staff's position is that the requested zoning district is appropriate for the site and that development
under this zoning district would be compatible with surrounding land uses Because land directly
to the east of the subject property is zoned RM -6, this request is for a continuation of an existing
multiple -family residential zoning pattern.
The Walker Avenue Club apartment complex on 26`h Street west of the subject property is also zoned
RM -6. Multiple -family and mobile home zoning and development are already prominent along both
sides of 26t Street, west of 58t Avenue.
Consistent with the comprehensive plan, the proposed rezoning implements an incremental transition
in zoning districts. This transition is accomplished by placing multiple -family districts between
single-family districts and commercial/industrial districts or major roads.
Located near the SR 60/58` Avenue commercial/industrial node (which includes the Indian River
Mall), the subject property is particularly well suited to meet the demand for multiple -family housing
generated by development within that node. In effect, the proposed rezoning would increase the
opportunity for people to live near their place of employment.
Development of the subject property would be expected to have little or no impact on the Vista
Plantation Condominiums to the south. That project, zoned RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential
District (up to 4 units/acre), contains a vegetative buffer, golf course and ponds along its north
boundary, which is 26th Street.
Similarly, incompatibilities between the subject property and adjacent A-1 zoned land are not
anticipated. The A-1 zoned land immediately to the west of the subject property is within the Urban
Service Area is designated L-2 and is expected to be eventually converted to residential uses.
With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural zoning on property
located within the Urban Service Area rather than changing it when the underlying land use
designation changes This not only reflects the county's policy of using agricultural zoning within
the Urban Service Area as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that urbanization occurs
incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods.
MAY 21, 2002
-33-
•
Two factors, however, indicate that urban type zoning districts would be appropriate for this portion
of the county. The first factor is the underlying
is within the urban service area and is deemed pproprriate fortion
residential ential deve Future el pmend Use t with densities
of up to 6 units/acre. P This area
Equally important is the development pattern in that portion of the coup
a regional mall, Dodgertown, and Vero Beach Municipal Airport, fit• is within
near a C/I node,
corridor. Additionally, that area has convenient access to the coup , the site is within a fasttThese
factors indicate a trend toward continued urbanization in that portion of the county.
oun system These
For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RM -6 zoning district would be compatible with
development in the surrounding area.
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
The environmental impacts of development on the subject property
a citrus grove, the site has been altered and contains no environmentally not a porta concern Bhi a
wetlands or sensitive uplands. For those reasons, no adverse environmental impacts assn associated with
this request are anticipated.
CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with
surrounding areas is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will
have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most
unportantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for multiple -family residential
uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis, the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from A-1 to RM -6 by
approving the attached ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Summary Page
2. Rezoning Application
3. Minutes of the March 28, 2002 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
4. Ordinance
MAY 21, 2002
-34-
•
SIJMNL4 RY PAGE
GENERAL
Applicant: James and Lora Adamson
Location: 26th Street approximately 400 feet west of 66th Avenue
Acreage: 13.94
Land Use Designation: L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acres)
Existing Zoning: A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
Requested Zoning: RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre)
Existing Land Use: Citrus grove and 1 single family residence
ADJACENT LAND
North' Citrus groves zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre)
East: Citrus groves zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential Dist. (up to 6 units/acre)
South: Multiple Family zoned RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential District. (up to
4 units/acre)
West: Rangeland and woodland zoned A-1, Agricultural -1 District (up to I unit/5 acres)
LNFRASTRUCTURE
Water and sewer available; access from 26th Street
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
None
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Staff Contact:
Date Advertised:
# of Surrounding
Property Owner
Notifications
Date Notification
Mailed:
Date Sign Posted:
Michael Brillhart
April 12, 2002
12
April 15, 2002
April 12, 2002
Randy Deshazo
May 8, 2002
12
May 3, 2002
May 7, 2002
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Corrunission and staff support the
request
ATTACHMENT
MAY 21, 2002
-35-
•
Community Development Director Bob Keating presented the project with the aid
of a PowerPoint presentation (COPY IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY'S
MEETING).
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Bruce Barkett, Attorney for the applicant, 756 Beachland Boulevard, stated that he
is here to answer any questions.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There
being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
MAY 21, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
adopted Ordinance 2002-020 amending the Zoning
Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for
13.94 acres located on the north side of 26`h Street
approximately 400 feet west of 66th Avenue from A-
1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RM -
6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acre) (James and Lora Adamson)
-36-
LAI
•
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-020
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 13.94
ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 26TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 400
FEET WEST OF 66TH AVENUE, FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1
UNIT/5 ACRES) TO RM -6, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE); AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND
EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described property situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
THE EAST 13.94 ACRES OF THE WEST 23.94 ACRES OF TRACT 16, SECTION 31,
TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ALL ACCORDING TO THE LAST
GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY FILED IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, IN PLAT BOOK 2 PAGE 25. SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND BEING IN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS
RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD
LESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30' OF SOUTH 60' THEREOF, FOR
ADDITIONAL ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
is changed from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RM -6, Multiple -family
Residential District (up to 6 units/acre).
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, on this 2151 day of May 2002.
MAY 21, 2002
-37-
•
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-020
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 8`h day of May, 2002, for a.public
hearing to be held on the 2151 day of May, 2002 at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Ginn , seconded by Commissioner
Ti pp n ,and adopted by
the following vote:
Chairman Ruth M Stanbridge
Vice -Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B Adams
Commissioner Kenneth R Macht
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Ave
AVP
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: gaZ
Ruth M. Stanbridge!Chairman
ATTEST B
Ct
Jeffrey K. Barton,
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date*
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M. Keating, AICD; Com unity
Risk Mgr.
MAY 21, 2002
ment Director
-38-
• •
9.A.2.
PUBLIC HEARING - REVENUE DISTRIBUTION
FORMULA FOR 6¢ LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 209 OF THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY CODE
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 13, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Revenue Distribution Formula
for 6 Local Option Gas Tax
DATE: May 13, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
As required by Chapter 209 of the Indian River County Code, the
Board of County Commissioners shall conduct a Public Hearing in May
biannually to approve a revenue distribution formula for the 6t
Local Option Gas Tax. This tax revenue is currently shared with
the five municipalities based upon a formula as follows:
"The percentage of total revenue allocated to each eligible
entity equals one-third of the entity's percentage of total
equivalent lane miles of road plus one-third of the entity's
percentage of transportation expenditures over the previous
five years plus one-third of the entity's total percentage of
population residing in the area based upon the most recent
estimate from the Florida Bureau of Economic and Business
Research."
This formula has been used over the past fifteen years.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Unless the Board receives substantial objection from the
municipalities, staff recommends that the existing formula be
retained
MAY 21, 2002
-39-
nv
thk
CHAPTER 209. LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
TABLE INSET:
Sec. 209 01
Short title.
Sec. 209.02.
Levy of tax.
Sec. 209.03.
Effective date.
Sec. 209.04.
Sec. 209.05.
Disposition of proceeds.
Utilization of proceeds.
Section 209.01. Short title.
This article shall be known and may be cites as the "Indian River County Local Option
Gas Tax Ordinance.'
(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92)
Section 209.02. Levy of tax.
There is hereby imposed a six cent ($0.06) local option gas tax upon every gallon of
motor fuel and special fuel sold in Indian River County and taxed under the provisions of F.S
Ch. 206.
(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92)
Section 209.03. Effective date.
The tax imposition hereby made shall be effective from September 1, 1996 to August
31, 2026 both inclusive.
(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92; Ord. No. 96-11, § 1, 4-23-96)
Section 209 04. Disposition of proceeds.
(a) The disposition of proceeds shall be pursuant to interlocal agreement with one or more
of the municipalities located therein, representing a majority of the population of the
incorporated area within the county. Said agreement shall provide a distribution formula
for dividing the entire proceeds of the local option gas tax among the county government
and all eligible municipalities within the county Said formula is set forth in paragraph (b)
of this section. The method of distribution of the local option gas tax revenues shall be
reviewed and a public hearing held in May at least every two (2) years by the parties to
the agreement.
(b) Each year, during the term of the imposition of this tax, the division and distribution of
tax proceeds under this article shall be evaluated and recalculated based upon the
following formula:
The percentage of total revenue allocated to each eligible entity equals one-third (1/3) of
the entity's percentage of total equivalent lane miles of road plus one-third (1/3) of the
entity's percentage of transportation expenditures over the previous five (5) years plus
MAY 21, 2002
-40-
• •
one-third (1/3) of the entity's total percentage of population residing in the area based
upon the most recent estimate from the Florida Bureau of Economic and Business
Research.
Each eligible entity (municipality) shall report the above information to the Indian River
County Public Works Director by April 30th of each year. Should the above information not be
reported to the public works director by Apnl 30th of each year the public works director shall
recalculate the distribution of proceeds based upon the previous year's information, or other
reliable information whichever is more recent, for each non -reporting eligible entity
(municipality).
By June 15 of each year, the county shall provide the Florida State Department of
Revenue a certified copy of the distribution proportions established by interlocal agreement
under this section. The revised distribution of tax proceeds shall become effective on
September 1 of the same year.
(c) If, during the term of the imposition of this tax, the county or any of the municipalities
become ineligible to receive a share of the local option gas tax for any reason, any
funds otherwise undistributed because of ineligibility shall be distributed by the
department of revenue to eligible governments within Indian River County in proportion
to other monies distributed pursuant to this section
(d) The distribution formula established herein shall also govern the division and distribution
of proceeds of the local option gas tax imposed through August 31, but not collected
otherwise available for distribution until after August 31, of the year this levy terminates.
(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92; Ord. No. 96-11, § 1, 4-23-96; Ord. No. 2001-012, § 1, 3-20-01)
Section 209.05. Utilization of proceeds.
Proceeds of the tax imposed herein shall be utilized only for transportation expenditures
in accordance with the provisions and requirements of F.S. § 336 025.
(Ord. No. 92-26, § 4, 7-14-92)
Public Works Director Jim Davis reviewed the recommendation for the Board and
also asked for authorization for staff to transmit the Table on Page 100 of the backup, to
become effective September 1, 2002, to the State of Florida, Department of Revenue:
MAY 21, 2002
-41-
MAY 21, 2002
0
0
SEBASTIAN
FELLSMERE
VERO BEACH
a
✓
h
vii p tki1N
Transportation Expenditures
co O
kr) ao V r4
en
7 n b 000 vel ' :V
oo
� e1 01 O, -- N
44
O
fp t vt r7 0o f`7 O
7
69 69 69 Vi f,
Vf
n v
co Oo •• O
eel
p v CTo o
▪ CT. 'CT T rT N • Y1
t/ O • n 0; CN W t/1
Cr; V- N V7061-1
09 019 49 49 fA (9
01 0 )0 n vo
en z rN1 7 n. in
se a O a ON
ON m
00 r-- T 00 4-1 tel
4'1 4f rA GA V9 Ea
r/ N l0 01 O\ ao
e1 N - h N e
AO 00 re) O CTCC)••
cc;O rri 0' mo -
V
00 O h _ N C4 AD CN cel e1 '
Oil
N e+i N N N — _
69 41 Vi 4i 4i
r„1 h O Os z 0
n
h .-. rD a. L? e1 -I0o y O r N O
..t ••:r a CO rco os1 'f:
N 0o
n
H69 40,
d! 4i H 69
O co0 H co
o 0 01 0o r
0 o a o o. s i
N7 >
O N P 7Oco hl Q
-42-
b
r e e e
▪ 0 CD 0 0 =,
0
0
u
2
wool
r N
AD
N V (T p
rn
N u
0
4.4
0 0
o e e G
01 "zrvet
0 O O vt
0
V
0
9
o \' e 0
o Z
co r ▪ : —
O 4- c
On h 00g
let -
o• s V NI:- 7
ab
0
00
ea6.a
T
V
U&
O O
• c
N r`
O co
Oh N ol
E
r'1 N
rer 1 H C
V
c0
to
to0
o
to0
G VL
c
0o
On e 'a-2
m
Z.
co Opt rel Y
r a
0o 00 a Y
^ N 5
.A. .re;i u c
70. IA
0 m
9
O 5
e0 V
= 0
✓ c
06.
n n1
Co.!el
O O e = 0
•rn 00
co en Yl Y m
ten 00 V ‘C!
- a
4 49
In rei 0 0 -o6. .
W n W SE
0 0 0 Y o
Q O Q o
Fry F -o u
Z 0 Z eF
U N U- -
III
OG fa 8
E `R. N
� N UmE
c c
cy 0... E" O 5 c.
>0 �.o .0
a x N It Et
5 It
POPULATION (2001)
'0
0
• •
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved retaining the existing formula and
authorized staff to forward the Table to the State of
Florida, Department of Revenue, as recommended
by staff
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC
HEARING JUNE 4, 2002 - ANTHONY J. SCIACCOTTA
REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF 84TH
TERRACE RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH OF 22ND STREET
WITHIN PARADISE PARK (Legislative)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 14, 2002:
MAY 21, 2002
-43-
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
NT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert . Keating, AICP
Community Development 1 irector
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
THROUGH: John W. McCoy, AICP )
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: May 14, 2002
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for Upcoming Board Meeting
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21S`, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Please be advised that the following public hearing has been scheduled for Board consideration, as
follows:
June 4`h, 2002 Meeting
1. Anthony J. Sciaccotta's request for an abandonment of a portion of 84th Terrace right-of-way
south of 22nd Street within Paradise Park. [Legislative]
RECOMMENDATION:
The above referenced public hearing date is provided for the Board's information. No action is
needed.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
MAY 21, 2002
-44-
10. EXTENSION OF 10 LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX FY 2004/05
THROUGH FY 2019/20
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 15, 2002:
To:
Through:
From.
Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
James E.Chandler
County Admimstra
Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County As . • u 'strato
Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Date: May 15, 2002
Subject: Extension of Local Option Sales Tax
FY 2004/05 through FY 2019/20
Description:
Chapter 212 of the Florida Statutes permits County residents to vote upon, and impose additional
taxes upon themselves in order to raise monies for any number of purposes, as predefined by
law. For several years now, Indian River County has had such a `discretionary surtax' in place.
Commonly known as the "Local Option Sales Tax' or, more formally, the `Local Government
Infrastructure Surtax," this one cent sales tax was first approved by the voters in 1989 for
funding certain critical capital projects at that time. For example, county roads were upgraded to
come into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The new Courthouse, the Indian River
County Jail and the new Health Department building were all constructed using Optional Sales
Tax funds.
The tax was approved for a term of fifteen years During this time, the Optional Sales Tax has
made possible such current projects as building expansions at both the Main and North County
Libraries; and continued improvement and upgrading of the County's road system through
paving, bridge repair and construction of new sidewalks and bike paths
Major road projects have also been made possible by this tax. Currently, 58th Avenue, a mayor
north -south conduit, is being widened to four lanes from Route 60 to Oslo Road, to better
accommodate the markedly increased traffic caused by a population increase in the County. Old
bridges leading to this road are also being replaced in an effort to enhance traffic flow coming
from mayor streets leading to 58`h Avenue.
MAY 21, 2002
-45-
_a
An expanding population needs increased safety and health services. With that in mind, sales tax
funds have been used to construct additional fire stations, as well as expand existing fire stations
to accommodate new Advanced Life Support (ALS) services. A new Health Department dental
clinic was recently under construction The Sheriff's Department has used sales tax funds for a
much needed security retrofit at the Indian River County Jail.
The tax also made it possible to expand recreational offerings to our residents by construction of
entirely new parks, such as the North County, South County and Round Island Parks, as well as
improvements at Donald McDonald and Wabasso Causeway Parks. The Gifford Aquatic Center,
a new state of the art swimming facility completed in just the past year, was partially funded by
this tax, and partially funded by private contributions coordinated by the Gifford Progressive
Civic League.
The original referendum approved the Optional Sales Tax through May 31, 2004. In order to
continue receiving funding from this source, the Board must approve an ordinance calling for a
Countywide referendum set before the voters during the November 2002 general election. The
purpose of this agenda item is to illustrate the advantages of this tax and to urge passage of an
ordinance allowing the tax to continue for an additional 16 years.
Discussion:
The Optional Sales Tax offers a number of advantages over the traditional ad valorem (property)
tax, as described below:
1. Everyone pays -not just the property owners: Our population swells significantly with
part-time residents and tourists during the winter months. County roads and other
infrastructure are built for peak demand. Visitors use the same libranes, roads and parks
as our permanent residents Yet because of their `nonpermanent status, they do not 'pay'
for their construction or use as our property owners do.
Pursuant to Section 212.054(2)(a), Florida Statutes, the tax " ...shall be a discretionary
surtax on all transactions occurring in the county which transactions are subject to the
state tax imposed on sales, use, services, rentals, admissions and other transactions by
this chapter and communications services as defined for the purposes of Chapter 202."
Clearly, anybody visiting here for any length of time will be highly likely to 'use' or
`purchase' a service which will have the tax imposed on it.
2. `Essentials" -Food and Medicine are not taxed: Any extra tax, even a small one, can
place undue hardship on people with limited economic resources. The tax exempts most
purchases of food and medicine, just as these purchases are exempt from state taxes
Rather, the tax is on `non-essential' transactions, in essence, those that might be
considered above the basic survival needs of an individual.
3. Health of the local economy is preserved: Large transactions such as car and boat sales
are important to the economic health of the County. The local option sales tax cannot be
collected on sales amounts above $5,000 on any item of tangible personal property -thus
capping the maximum amount of additional sales tax collectible on this type of
transaction at $50.
4. Money is earmarked for specific projects: In accordance with Florida Statutes, the
Optional Sales Tax cannot be used for governmental operating expenses. A schedule
detailing proposed projects for the first five year period of the levy -discussed in more
detail later in this agenda item- does show operating expenditures associated with these
projects but this category is for information only. Only capital exnenditures associated
with a project may be expended from Optional Sales Tax funds.
MAY 21, 2002
-46-
• •
5. Reduces the burden of impact and user fees on building contractors and homeowners
when a service must be provided under the County s Comprehensive Plan.
6. Debt burden is reduced: A steady stream of revenue for capital projects reduces the need
to rely upon outside debt as a funding source, as well as the resultant interest expenses
incurred. Generally, bond issues and other forms of debt, and their issuance and
borrowing costs, often increase property taxes or impact revenue streams which are
needed for the County's operating expenses. Certainly any way that the County can
realistically reduce reliance upon outside debt as a revenue source is desirable.
7. Cities and County Share Revenue: The sales tax is not just received by the County. All
municipalities receive a proportionate share of the sales tax for their infrastructure needs
The distribution is based upon the formula established in Chapter 218.62, Florida
Statutes.
Future Capital Projects -Prioritization of Projects
As stated earlier, the original voter referendum only extended the Local Option One Cent Sales
Tax until 2004. As the population of our County continues to increase the sales tax will prove
an advantageous way to fund the necessary projects and services that our expanded populace will
require for its safety and well-being.
Recently, the County Administrator's Office asked the Departments to analyze the County's
infrastructure needs over the coming years and submit proposals from their perspective. When
this analysis was complete projects totaling over $150 million in combined capital expenditures
were submitted for the Administrator's review. This office then reviewed and rated these projects
according to urgency.
Of the over $150 million in capital requests originally submitted, only $61 million in revenues
are available in the first frve years to fund the submitted projects. Projects considered having the
highest priority were included for funding in this first five year period. Some of the less critical
projects will be considered for funding in the second or third five year periods in the context of
the County s infrastructure needs in that future time.
A preliminary schedule of proposed projects for the first five year period, October 151, 2004 -
September 30`h, 2009 is on file in the BCC office. This schedule provides a brief description of
each project and its originating department, as well as estimated construction costs and operating
expenses over this five year period (Operating expenditures are not funded by this tax, and are
included for information purposes only).
Larger Projects under consideration for the period October 1, 2004 -September 30, 2009
Highlighted below is a tentative list of some of the larger projects under consideration in the
2004-2009 period. This is by no means a final list, rather it is submitted merely for discussion
purposes.
1. More people bring more vehicles, and so road and bridge projects remain a high priority.
The 43`d Avenue comdor is slated for expansion to 4 lanes from 8`h to 26th Streets, to
address increasing traffic congestion and accidents in that area ($2,000,000). Bridges at
the Lateral A Canal, east of 66t Avenue are in critical need of repair ($5,000,000). In the
North County, residents there can benefit from left turn lane improvements at the
intersections of a number of streets and heavily traveled 58th Avenue (estimated cost,
$900 000), and a proposed four lane widening of County Road 512 ($1,000,000). In total,
$19,400,000 will be needed from Optional Sales Tax for road improvement projects over
the next five years
MAY 21, 2002
-47-
75
A proposed expansion of the Indian River County jail to include a 240 person medium
security unit (cost estimate: $11 317 000 before operating expenditures) is a
necessary project given the continued growth in population.
A proposed library branch —with an estimated cost of construction of $6,680,000
Two new fire/paramedic stations -estimated cost to purchase land and build the stations -
$3,337,443
Stormwater projects such as those planned for Vero Lake Estates help preserve the Indian
River Lagoon by reducing pollution runoff (estimated cost $2,000,000).
Many tourists from throughout the world come to Vero Beath specifically to visit our
beautiful beaches. Renounshment projects have been proposed to battle erosion problems
our area beaches have experienced.
Conclusion and Recommendations:
It is important to emphasize that these projects will become necessary regardless of whether the
Optional Sales Tax is extended. If the Optional Sales Tax is not approved, projects such as those
listed above will need to be funded from other sources, which would have a substantial impact
on ad valorem (property) taxes.
Resolutions supporting an extension of the one -cent sales tax for 15 years have already been
adopted by all municipalities within the County (the Cities of Vero Beach, Sebastian and
Fellsmere as well as the Towns of Indian River Shores and Orchid). These municipalities also
benefit from the tax as they receive a proportionate share of any monies the County receives for
their infrastructure needs as well.
Given the clear advantages that the Local Option Sales Tax will provide to Indian River County,
we recommend that the Board
Review the list of proposed capital projects forwarded by the County Administrator to be
included in the first five year plan. It must be emphasized again that the schedule is
merely preliminary There are many more worthy projects that warrant immediate
funding then there will be available dollars for, making any decisions as to their inclusion
or exclusion during the first five year period extremely difficult. The list is presented for
discussion and input purposes in order to arrive at a final proposal.
Approve the creation of an ordinance calling for a countywide referendum during the
November General Election, to be held November 5th, 2002 (Staff will be presenting
this ordinance for formal approval by the Board in June).
Staff also recommends that the Local Option Sales Tax be approved for a period of 16
years Per law the tax must be levied on a calendar year basis, which we propose should
begin January 1st, 2004 and end December 31, 2019 (This would avoid gaps from the
end of the prior levy -May 31st, 2004, to January 1st, 2005, the beginning of the current
one). We believe that this extended period will allow for better long range planning of
the County's and its municipalities' capital funding needs.
MAY 21, 2002
Assistant County Administrator Joe Baird stated that this program was first approved
in 1989 for a period of 15 years which expires May 31, 2004. These taxes have funded
many critical infrastructure projects such as the new jail, the new courthouse, the health
department, roads, bridges, fire stations, park improvements, and expansion of the libraries.
There are many advantages to this tax over other revenue streams in that everyone pays; it
preserves the health of the economy; it reduces impact fees; and it funds projects without the
necessity of issuing debt. For fiscal year 2001-02 the revenue estimates are $16,100,000;
$11,000,000 to the County; $438,000 to the City of Fellsmere; $396,000 to the Town of
Indian River Shores; $16,000 to the Town of Orchid; $1,859,000 to the City of Sebastian;
and $2,000,000 to the City of Vero Beach.
Mr. Baird continued that he had asked for each department's infrastructure needs and
the total cost of those requests was in excess of $150,000,000. There were many important
projects with merit but some had to be excluded. The proposed projects are submitted as
follows for consideration:
OPTIONAL SALES TAX PROGRAM FOR FIRST FIN, c YEARS
Proposed Projects - October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2009
MAY 21, 2002
1st
October
Seat.
Year
1, 2004 to
301 2005
2nd
October
September
Year
1, 2005 to
30, 2006
3rd
October
Se.tember
Year
1, 2006 to
30, 2007
4th Year
October 1, 2007 to
September 30, 2008
5th
October
September
Year
1, 2008 to
30, 2009
TOTAL
Revenues:
Cash Forward
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Optional Sales Tax
$11,500,000
$11,615,000
$11,731,150
$11,848,462
$11,941,947
558,636,559
Interest
Income
$575,000
$560,000
$550,000
$475,000
$425,000
$2,585,000
Total
Revenues
$12,075,000
$12,175,000
$12,281,150
$12,323,462
$12,366,947
$61,221,559
Expenditures:
Administration Building
54,500,000
$1,500,000
$0
$0
$0
$6,000,000
Beach Restoration Projects
$0
50
$0
$75,000
$2,000,000
$2,075,000
Emergency Services
$500,000
$2,292,738
$1,600,000
$0
$1,144,705
$5,537,443
General Services - Buildings
$0
$0
$0
SO
$430,456
$430,456
Library Projects
$0
50
$0
$3,340,000
$3,340,000
$6,680,000
Parks & Recreation Projects
$600,000
$0
$2,900,000
$1,050,000
$0
54,550,000
Public Works
$0
$0
$100,000
$900,000
$0
51,000,000
Road Improvements
$1,150,000
$3;150,000
$5,240,000
$4,710,000
$3,050,000
$17,300,000
Sheriffs Department
$4,158,400
$5,658,400
51,500,000
$0
$0
511,316,800
Stonnwater Projects
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
$2,000,000
S.W.D.D. - Landfill Projects
$735,000
$418,000
5160,000
$160,000
$160,000
$1,633,000
Telecommunications
$355,000
$80,000
$80,000
$190,000
$190,000
$895,000
Reserve
for Contingencies
$250,000
$250,000
$300,000
$450,000
$553,860
$1,803,860
Total
Expenditures
12,648,400
13,749,138
12,280,000
11,275,000
11,269,021
61,221,559
Di
,erence
573 400
1 574 138
1 150
1 048 462
1 097 926
0
MAY 21, 2002
Mr. Baird stated that staff is asking the Board to (1) review the projects list and make
recommendations; (2) approve a Countywide referendum on November 5, 2002; and (3)
approve the program for 16 years instead of 15 years to overlap the current program which
expires May 31, 2004. The new program would go into effect on January 1st, 2004 to avoid
a 7 -month period with no revenue coming in. The Department of Revenue has changed the
law so that these programs must now all begin on January 1".
Commissioner Ginn felt the proposed project list was well done and wanted the
public to be aware that without this additional funding the library projects and many road
improvements would not have been possible. Our County is ahead of most of South Florida
because ofplanning done in 1999 by the Regional Planning Council. She stated that she has
a resolution in support of the program from each of the municipalities involved. (COPIES
OF RESOLUTIONS ARE ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP TO TODAY'S MEETING).
She also pointed out that operating costs for each of these proposed projects would be new
and hoped that the County would continue to review this program every 5 years.
Chairman Stanbridge noted that this is not a public hearing but she would allow
public comment.
Frank Coffey, 5015 Fairways Drive, pointed out the program could have an effect
on ad valorem taxes because of the operating expenditures.
Mr Baird responded that without the program, the County would have to bridge the
revenue source and pay debt service expenses as well as operating costs.
Commissioner Macht commented that all the proposed projects are predicated on
growth and ad valorem revenues would increase proportionately.
MAY 21, 2002
-50-
1
•
Commissioner Adams felt that the most important asset of the program is that it is not
just the burden of the property owners, but everyone pays. This is still very much a
residential community and it is a good thing to have everyone participate. This is the fairest
of all ways to provide for expansion and infrastructure growth.
Commissioner Ginn questioned how much of this revenue would come from out -of -
County people, and Mr. Baird responded that up to 40% comes from that source.
Mayor Walter Barnes, City of Sebastian, felt this is an ideal way to finance public
projects.
Mayor Joel Tyson, City of Fellsmere, stated that his City would not exist without this
program and emphasized its importance.
Rene Renzi, 340 Waverly Place, questioned whether the income from out -of -county
prisoners at the jail is still coming in, and Mr Baird stated that revenue has dropped
considerably. The new jail will be needed by 2006 due to the population increase pursuant
to State requirements. If the additional fail space is not made available, we would have to
pay another county to take our overflow prison population.
Commissioner Macht commented that this would not be a new jail but an extension
to the existing jail.
Ms. Renzi then questioned the amount for libraries, and Mr. Baird stated that amount
would be necessary for the proposed west or south county branch.
Commissioner Macht noted that in spite of the construction work, patronage at the
North County Library went up last month by 6,000 units. Their main computer bank has a
waiting line of 6 to 7 people. A larger branch will probably be needed in south county.
MAY 21, 2002
-51-
01(
j 79
•
Commissioner Macht noted that the income from out -of -county prisoners comes
totally from the federal government.
Mr. Baird commented that the best revenue source is from housing federal prisoners.
Commissioner Adams noted that staff's recommendation is for authorization to go
to a referendum vote. These projects are anticipated but not set in stone.
Commissioner Ginn wanted to include the requirement to reprioritize the projects
every 5 years with a public hearing.
Commissioner Macht felt that Items 1 through 7 in staff's Memorandum, entitled
"Discussion", would be the best and most concise illustration of the proposal to be in the
information to be presented to the public.
County Administrator Jim Chandler commended Assistant County Administrator Joe
Baird and Budget Manager Jason Brown for their work on this project.
MAY 21, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved: (1) the list of proposed
capital projects to be included in the first five-year
plan, (2) the creation of an ordinance calling for a
countywide referendum during the November
General Election, to be held November 5t", 2002 (to
be submitted to the Board for approval in June,
2002); and (3) the 10 Local Option Sales Tax for a
period of 16 years to begin January 1st, 2004 and end
December 31 st, 2019, all as recommended by staff
-52-
DU ,,
UR 1_
COPIES OF MUNICIPAL RESOLUTIONS IN SUPPORT OF
THE CONTINUATION OF THE LOCAL OPTION ONE -CENT
SALES TAX ARE ON FILE FROM VERO BEACH, ORCHID,
SEBASTIAN, FELLSMERE AND INDIAN RIVER SHORES
11.C.1. COUNTY LIBRARY FACILITIES - RENTAL FEES FOR
USE OF VARIOUS MEETING ROOMS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 14, 2002:
Date: May 14, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director +�
Subject: Rental Fees for Use of various Meeting Rooms at County Library Facilities
BACKGROUND:
Within the next several weeks, the two libraries will again be able to provide meeting rooms to
the various members of the general public. These library additions have increased the size of
certain meeting rooms and in some case even created additional rooms not available before.
Currently, the multi-purpose meeting room in the Main Library has an established fee of $20.00
per meeting, and the North County Library multi-purpose meeting room has as established fee of
$10.00. If the meeting were library sponsored meetings, there was no fee. Additionally, there
were no charges for the use of conference rooms or study/typing rooms. Those fees were
established by the Board's adoption of the Indian River County Library System Policy and
Procedures Manual on July 16, 1991.
The attached memorandum from Mary Powell, Director of Library Services, outlines suggested
meeting room fees.
Staff would like to propose an interim fee schedule that would be charged as follows:
MAY 21, 2002
North County Library
1. Large (Multi-purpose) Room
• Non -Commercial Use
• Commercial Use
2. Study Rooms
Main Library
1 Large (Multi-purpose) Room
• Non -Commercial Use
• Commercial Use
2. 40-50 Seat Meeting Room
• Non -Commercial Use
• Commercial Use
3. Study Rooms
4. Small Classroom/meeting rooms
Full Day
Half Day
$40.00
$100.00
No Charge
$50.00
$100.00
$50.00
$50.00
No Charge
$25.00
No Charge
No Charge
With the adoption of these fees or similar fees, ultimately, charges for such things as a twenty-
five cent reserve fee could be deleted. This would also provide for an alternate revenue source
should a "State-wide" library card become a reality
The Indian River County Library System Policy and Procedures Manual is approximately eleven
years old and needs to be updated. It is anticipated that upon completion of the library expansion
currently underway, staff would be able to review and make recommendations relative to any
changes that should be included including a permanent fee schedule for the use of meeting
rooms. Staff shall have a draft of those proposed modified policy and procedures to the Board
no later than October 1, 2002.
RECOM ENDATION:
Staff reconunends that the fees, as proposed above, be approved as interim rates to be charged
until the adoption of a amended Policy and Procedures Manual by October 1, 2002.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht to approve
staff's recommendation.
MAY 21, 2002
•
General Services Director Tom Frame stated that the proposed fees have been
presented to the Public Library Advisory Board, which concurred with the proposed fees.
He then asked that the recommendation be amended to include the waiver of the 25¢ book
reserve fee.
MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner
Adams to include waiver of the 25¢ book reserve
fee, SECONDED by Commissioner Macht.
Commissioner Ginn was concerned about the cost to a lot of non -profits which use
these rooms.
Director Frame pointed out the differing rates proposed for commercial and non-
commercial use and stated that the intent is to make the prices competitive and cost-
effective.
Commissioner Ginn felt that the Library is supported with tax money and most of the
non -profits provide services to the general public.
Commissioner Macht agreed that these non-profit participants also pay taxes and raise
funds to provide their services. He could not support adding another burden.
Commissioner Adams noted that there are costs to clean and maintain the rooms and
felt there should be some charge.
Director Frame noted that these proposed fees would be in effect from now until
October 1" when staff will come back with a proposed manual which can include any
modifications.
MAY 21, 2002
-55-
Du ori
f.+I $ es
•
Commissioner Adams noted that these fees will replace revenue from some other
charges which will be abolished.
Commissioner Ginn was not in favor of raising the rates and preferred to hold off
until the proposed manual could be presented in October.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion passed by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner
Ginn opposed). (Approved the interim rates to be
charged until the adoption of an Amended Indian
River County Library System Policy and Procedures
Manual by October 1, 2002, as recommended by
staff, and waived the 25¢ book deposit fee effective
immediately.)
11.C.2. HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND JAIL ROOFING DESIGN
SERVICES - RESCIND R. L. REEGER CONTRACT -
APPROVE EDLUND DRITENBAS CONTRACT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 14, 2002:
Date: May 14, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director 4u).
Subject: Roofing Design Services
BACKGROUND:
On April 23, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement to utilize the
services of R.L. Reeger, an architect and roofing consultant via a Lake County School Board
MAY 21, 2002
-56-
•
Contract for the design of the re -roofing of the Health Department and County Jail, After
additional review, staff has determined that it is not in the interest of Indian River County to
pursue that approach. Therefore, the Board is being requested to rescind that action.
Currently, two roofing projects have been budgeted for within this fiscal year. The first is the re-
roofing of the Health Department building for $75 000. The second project is the re -roofing of
Phase 1 of the Indian River County Jail for $112,000. Presently under Flonda Statutes (Section
287.055, F S.) the Consultant's Competitive Competition Act requires a Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) if the project construction costs exceeds $250,000. Since neither project
exceeds that amount nor does the cumulative total, the requirement for the formal RFQ is not
statutorily required. The County's Purchasing Code (Section 105.05) stipulates compliance with
Section 287.055 or as it may be amended. Further, the purchasing code specifies Board approval
for any service over $5,000 (Section 105 02).
Currently, we have asked the architectural firm, Edlund Dritenbas, the designers of the dental
clinic addition to the Health Department to review the issue of including the re -roofing of the
Health Department as a potential added service to that project. It seemed the most effective
alternative since we are coordinating the construction of a roofed area in conjunction with the
dental clinic addition.
Subsequently, I have asked the firm to consider the design for the re -roofing associated with the
County Jail Again, since the architect has already been selected through a CCNA (Consultant's
Competitive Negotiation Act) process for earlier designs such as the North County Library and
the Dental Clinic Addition, it appears to be the most efficient way to proceed for both the Health
Department roof and Jail roofSince the projects are not bound by the requirements of Section
287.055, F.S., the Board would have to approve the use of the architect before further activity
could proceed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board rescind its action of April 23, 2002 relative to the proposed
contract with R. L. Reeger. Secondly, authorize staff to proceed with negotiations with Edlund
Dritenbas, Architects, for the re -roofing design and services with the staff bringing back an
appropriate contract for the Board's approval if successfully negotiated.
General Services Director Tom Frame noted that these are both large roofs and some
expert advice is required. The Dritenbas firm is familiar with the buildings and had detected
the leak in the jail roof. Staff wants to make certain what is being proposed. The original
consultant was obtained through piggybacking a Lake County School System contract which
has a technical and/or legal problem. Staff feels it would be best to rescind that contract and
go with the Dritenbas firm but is only requesting authorization to negotiate a contract.
MAY 21, 2002
-57-
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously rescinded its action of April 23, 2002
relative to the proposed contract with R. L Reeger
and authorized staff to proceed with negotiations
with Edlund Dritenbas, Architects, for the re -roofing
design and services with the understanding that staff
will bring back an appropriate contract for the
Board's approval, if successfully negotiated, as
recommended by staff.
11.C.3. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS - MODULAR OFFICE
CHANGE ORDER - G. E. CAPITAL MODULAR SPACE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 15, 2002:
Date: May 15, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director _ [mcud
Subject: Supervisor of Elections Office Space, Change Order # 1
BACKGROUND:
On April 23, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved the lease agreement with G.E.
Capital Modular Space for a monthly charge of $5,894 ($70,728 annually).
Recently, after review of the detailed specifications, the front doors were found to be
unacceptable since they were solid core metal doors with a 10 -inch square window opening. In
discussing this with the Supervisor of Elections, it was determined that French doors would be
more functional and provide a more aesthetic appearance
MAY 21, 2002
-58-
•
Contact was made with G.E. Capitol and we were advised that French doors could be added but
it would increase the monthly rental by $70.00 per month In order to stay on schedule, it is
requested that the Board approve this additional change. This will bring the monthly charge to
S5 964 per month and establish an annual cost of $71,568.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that in order to provide a more acceptable door, that the change order be
approved by the Board authorizing an additional $70.00 per month in lease charges.
Commissioner Adams expressed her frustration that this project is getting out of
control. Almost every week another change is being presented.
General Services Director Tom Frame stated that the extra expense is to comply with
the required additional wind loads.
Commissioner Ginn commented that this change involves some safety issues. The
regular door only had a small glass pane and she, as well as the Supervisor of Elections, had
understood that the french doors were included in the original estimate.
Commissioner Adams noted that when the talks first began about the new voting
machines, there was no expectation that the whole Elections Office would have to be moved.
She was concerned that the project was getting totally "out of hand" and wondered when it
would stop.
Commissioner Macht commented that this is another unfunded State mandate.
Director Frame noted that the modular unit has been ordered and is in the process of
being manufactured.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by
a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Adams opposed)
approved the Change Order with G. E Capital
Modular Space resulting in a monthly charge of
$5,964 and an annual cost of $71,568, as
recommended by staff.
•
MAY 21, 2002
a4'
Lai
-59-
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.E.1. MUNIS SOFTWARE AGREEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 15, 2002:
DATE: MAY 15, 2002
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THROUGH: JOSEPH A. BAIRD, ASSISTANT CO 1 ADMINISTRATO
FROM: ED FRY, FINANCE DIRECTOR
JASON E. BROWN, BUDGET MANAGER
SUBJECT: MUNIS SOFTWARE AGREEMENT0
BACKGROUND
In December 2000, the Board authorized the Clerk of the Circuit Court to enter into a contract
with the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Research Center to assist in the
development of a Request For Proposal for an Enterprise Financial System. The goal was to
identify a software vendor that would be able to provide a financial system that would best meet
the county's needs. The enterprise financial system would provide for the integration of the
purchasing system, the budget system, the accounts payable system, the personnel system, -the.
utilities system, and other core financial systems. Currently, each system is independent, which
requires each department to manually input similar information. The accounts payable system is
over twenty years old. The budget system is over ten years old The Utilities system is over ten
years old The purchasing system runs on a PC based platform, which is incompatible with the
platform used for budget and accounts payable None of the Board's departments have computer
access to the budget, purchasing, and accounts payable systems, but must rely upon paper reports
that are provided once a month.
To guide the selection process, two committees were established, an Executive Steering
Committee and an Advisory Committee. The Executive Steering Committee provided overall
policy and direction to the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee prepared the Request
For Proposal (RFP), evaluated the responses to the RFP, developed a shortlist of three software
vendors to demonstrate their software, attended the software demonstrations, and made a
recommendation to the Executive Steering Committee for a software vendor to provide an
enterprise financial system to the county.
The Executive Steering Committee consisted of the Assistant County Administrator, the Clerk of
the Circuit Court, the General Services Director, the Human Resources Director, and the Utihties
Director. In addition, the Budget Manager, the Computer Services Director, the Information
Systems Director, the Finance Director and the Assistant Finance Director served as staff
advisors.
MAY 21, 2002
-60-
Off
►LJ i
•
The Advisory Committee consisted of representatives of he Finance Department, Budget Office,
Human Resources Department, Utilities Department, Purchasing Department, Computer
Services Department, Information Systems Department, and the Clerk of the Circuit Court's
offices.
The Advisory Committee developed a RFP for an Enterprise Financial System. The RFP
provided general information about the current software systems in use and a detailed list of the
requirements that any new software must meet. After being reviewed by the GFOA Research
Center, the RFP was issued July 2, 2001, with responses due by August 8, 2001.
Eight responses to the RFP were received. The vendors submitting responses were.
Acuent/PeopleSoft; Aris/Oracle; Eden; GEMS; New World Systems; SunGard Bi -Tech;
SunGard Pentamation; and Munis. The Advisory Committee and the GFOA Research Center
reviewed each of the responses for compliance with the RFP requirements and the ability to meet
the detailed requirements of the RFP. Based upon that review, the Committee selected three
vendors, GEMS, Munis, and SunGard Bi -Tech, to come to the County for two days of
demonstrations. The purpose of the demonstrations was to provide an overview_ of their
software's capabilities and to show how their software would perform different county tasks. The
GFOA Research Center developed a script to be used by each vendor. This script had to be
followed by each vendor and would provide the Advisory Committee the ability to compare how
each vendor's software would handle daily tasks.
After the two-day demonstrations, held in September and October 2001, the Advisory
Committee recommended to the Executive Steering Committee that Munis be selected as the
software vendor.
Munis provided a preliminary contract that was reviewed by the GFOA Research Center and by
county staff. Many changes were made to the contract. In addition, staff went to two different
governments that were using Munis; Munis came to the county for another day of discovery in
November 2001, and based upon some concerns with functionality of the software, Munis came
to the county for two more days of demonstration in January 2002.
Staff has completed the review of the attached agreement and believes that it best meets the
needs of the County. Munis has agreed to many things that are quite favorable for the County.
Some of those are:
1) Unlimited users - The industry standard is to license by user.
2) Maximum price on services — There is a dollar cap on the amount of services that the
County will pay to achieve full implementation of the enterprise financial system.
3) Payments based on milestones — The County will make payments based on milestones
being achieved instead of services delivered
4) Phased payments for the software — The County will pay for the software in phases as the
software is implemented. The industry standard is to pay for all software upon delivery.
5) Discount for maintenance — The County will get a 50% discount on the first year of
maintenance.
In the last few years, governmental e-commerce has gained popularity and become a priority
area for improving services to residents and visitors. E-commerce functionality was not an
original requirement outlined in the RFP for an enterpnse financial system. Monis currently
offers a separate module for e-commerce that will be fully integrated into this system. This
system will allow for online transactions, such as online payment of utility bills. Staff plans to
execute a change order to this contract to provide an e-commerce module. We are
recommending this approach, so that staff can fully define the functionality requirements for this
module. Software license fees for this product are currently about $25,000.
MAY 21, 2002
-61-
�1
0
•
Funding for this project will be provided from the following sources:
Sources:
Fund Description
Total
Implementation
Maintenance
FY 2001/02
Optional Sales Tax
General Fund
Utilities Dept.
Building Division
SWDD
Golf Course
$697,087
$0
$205,026
$51,257
$51,257
$20,503
$0
$35,176
$10,345
$2,587
$2,587
$1,035
Maintenance
FY 2002/03
$0
$81,576
$23,993
$5,998
$5,998_.
$2,399
Total Sources
Uses:
Item Description
$1,025,130
Total
Implementation
$51,730
Maintenance
FY 2001/02
$119,964
Maintenance
FY 2002/03
Software License Fees
Hardware & Peripherals
Maintenance
Consulting
Implementation
Conversion
Other
$455,995
$266,000
$0 $51,730 $119,964
$27,500
$87,550
$30,360
$157,725
Total Uses
$1,025,130
$51,730 $119,864
Funds have been allocated for a financial software system in Optional Sales Tax in the amount of
$700,000. A budget amendment will be necessary to provide for maintenance fees for fiscal year
2001/02, as well as hardware costs for the enterprise funds. Maintenance fees for the 2002/03
fiscal year will be requested in the budget process for next year. Additionally, a Database
Administrator position will be requested in the Computer Services department to assist
departments in implementation and provide ongoing support for the system. This position will
also provide general support for county departments on the computer network.
Copies of the contract documents are on file in the office of the Board of County Commissioners
for review.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chair to sign the
Agreement with Munis
MAY 21, 2002
-62-
•
Commissioner Ginn was concerned about the involvement of Tyler Technology in
Munis and wanted to be certain that this company was nothing like the companies involved
with the software purchased for the Tax Collector and the Utilities Department.
Finance Director Ed Fry explained there was a very detailed process to select the best
vendor. 8 proposals were received and the companies were looked at on the basis of their
responses, their fiscal stability, the size of their customer base, and their software source.
Munis has been in existence over 20 years, is very stable and has over 700 clients. Munis
was acquired by Tyler with a lot of other companies. Staff feels confident that Munis will
be there for us. We will not be a test site, this is proven software which is in use by the
Broward County Sheriff's Office. The Government Finance Officers Association did a
survey to check the software customer satisfaction level and was pleased with the result.
Director Fry continued that this will be a time-consuming and difficult task and it will
probably be 2003 before everything is in place. He thanked everyone who cooperated in this
effort: the Board's office, the County Attorney's office, Budget, Purchasing, and Utilities.
He also expressed appreciation for the Government Finance Officers Association which did
a lot of the research and groundwork.
Director Fry also pointed out that there is an escrow agent for the source code so that
if Munis should discontinue business, the County would have access to the source code.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, the Board
unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute the
Munis Software Agreement, as recommended by
staff.
•
MAY 21, 2002
1
-63-
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.G.1. JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE
- PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT 9724 - BRAD
SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 9, 2002:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
James Chandler, County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directo
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr , P E , County Enginee
Ars
)I/
7
Jungle TraiUPelican Island Wildlife Refuge Public Improvements
IRC Project No. 9724
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RETAINAGE
DATE: May 9, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Indian River County entered into a Professional Architectural Services Agreement with Brad Smith
Associates, Inc. on May 23 2000. The original compensation amount was $154,022 00. Two (2)
amendments to the agreement have been executed which changed the compensation amount to
$193,361.00.
The Design and Permitting portion of the Professional Architectural Services Agreement has been
completed.
The Consultant has received $169,275.01 to date with $18,825.49 (10%) retainage previously held
by the County until a partial release of retainage in the amount of $9 412.75.(5%) was granted by the . .
Board of County Commissioners on December 7, 2001. The Consultant is now requesting a release
of the remainder of retainage in the amount of $9,412 74 The Professional Architectural Services
Agreement states that the retainage will be released upon award of a Construction Contract, which
has occurred. Construction is underway.
MAY 21, 2002
14,
-64-
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Alternative No. 1 - Approve the Consultant's request for release of remaining retainage in the
amount of $9 412.74.
Alternative No. 2 - Deny the Consultant's request for release of remaining retainage.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. Funding to be from Account No. 315-214-541-067.94.
ATTACHMENTS
1 • Brad Smith Associates, Inc., Consultant's Request for Payment dated April 26, 2002.
Chairman Stanbridge wanted the public to know that this project is being financed
by a grant from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), not ad
valorem taxes.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved the consultant's request for
release of remaining retainage in the amount of
$9,412.74, as recommended by staff.
MAY 21, 2002
11.H.1. UTILITY SERVICES 452.200 MHZ UHF WASTEWATER
RADIO TELEMETRY FREQUENCY - DATA FLOW
SYSTEMS, INC. RADIO TELEMETRY UNITS (RTUs) -
TELECOM NETWORK, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 10, 2002:
DATE: MAY 10, 2002
TO: JAMES E CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: W. ERIK OLSON, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
FROM: GENE A RAUTH, OPERATIONS MANAGER GIS
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES 452.200 MHz
UHF WASTEWATER RADIO TELEMETRY FREQUENCY
BACKGROUND:
The Department of Utility Services currently uses a licensed Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), 452.200 MHz UHF radio frequency as part of its wireless telemetry system
for the monitoring and control of Countywide wastewater collection / reuse distribution systems.
One of the core components of these systems are the 227 radio telemetry units (RUT),
manufactured by Data Flow Systems, Inc., of Melbourne, Florida. The 227 RTUs are located
throughout the County at various lift stations, collection, and distribution points. The 227 RTU's
utilize the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency for two-way communication with the West Regional
Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). Since the system was commissioned in 1990, the
Department of Utility Services has been utilizing Data Flow Systems, Inc., for technical and
product support.
In July of 2001, staff requested Data Flow System, Inc.'s assistance in trouble -shooting several
minor operation communication problems between the West Regional WWTF, and several of the
227 RTU's in the field. Upon review of the radio spectrum on or around the 452.200 MHz UHF
frequency, it was discovered that an intermittent, non -Indian River County signal, existed. The
intermittent signal is a source of interference, which results in a loss of monitoring and control of
the County system. Further investigation by Data Flow Systems, Inc, traced the intermittent
signal to a 500 -foot tall tower located in Palm Bay, Florida. Staff has since contacted the FCC, as
well as the party responsible for the source of the interference, Telecom Network, Inc., of
Birmingham, Alabama. Telecom Network, Inc., is a voice -communication company.
Both the FCC and Telecom Network, Inc , have informed staff that the 500 -foot tower located in
Palm Bay is properly licensed, and operating legally with the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency.
MAY 21, 2002
-66-
nu
Lit
•
ANALYSIS•
In 1995, the FCC implemented the Frequency Re -farming Act. This act established different
levels of prionty use for any frequency below 512 MHz UHF. The Re -farming Act gave a higher
level of priority to voice communication, with a lower priority being given to non -voice
communication. (See attached letter). As previously stated, the Department of Utility Services is
communication priority. The Frequency Re -farming Act has legally allowed voice
communication companies such as Telecom Network, Inc., the use of frequencies already
assigned to non -voice users such as Indian River County.
The problem that staff is now presented with, is that the interference will continue to cause a loss
of monitoring and control of the County system, unless some type of corrective action is taken.
Staff has requested and received from Data Flow Systems, Inc., several options that will resolve
the problem. (See attached letter).
Option # 1:
Option # 2:
Purchase and document the higher license priority's legal rights to the 452.200
MHz UHF frequency from Telecom Network, Inc., for the amount of $30 000.
Switch the system to an available UHF frequency other than the 452.200 MHz
UHF frequency.
Relicense 227 sites to a new UHF frequency $ 22,700
Retune all 227 radios to a new UHF frequency $ 41,997
TOTAL $ 64,697 .
Option # 3: Convert the system to an available VHF frequency
Replace and re -license all 227 UHF radios with 227 VHF radios.
TOTAL $ 429,030
Data Flow Systems, Inc , has recommended Option # 1 as the most cost-effective option. Based-
upon this recommendation, staff has contacted Telecom Network, Inc., to confirm a willingness
of sale and purchase price of $30,000. Telecom Network, Inc., has confirmed the purchase
prices, and provided a draft agreement for the purchase. Staff would like permission to pursue
Option # 1, and purchase the higher priority legal rights for the 452.200 MHz UHF frequency for
the amount of $30,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is staff's recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request
to proceed with Option # 1, to purchase the higher legal rights for the 452.200 MHz UHF
frequency from Telecom Network, Inc., in the amount of $30,000. It is staffs intent, at a
later date, to bring back to the Board the Contract of Sale as a separate agenda item.
•
MAY 21, 2002
•
-67-
J td
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously
approved the request to proceed with Option #1 to
purchase the higher legal rights for the 452.200
MHz UHF frequency from Telecom Network, Inc.
in the amount of $30,000, with the understanding
that a Contract of Sale will be submitted to the
Board for approval at a later date, as recommended
by staff.
11.I. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE - NEEDS
ASSESSMENT CONSULTANT - PUBLIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
(ROBIN S. CLEMENTS)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 15, 2002:
TO: Indian River County Commission
DATE: May 15, 2002
SUBJECT. .6 Contract for Needs Assessment Consultant for Children's
Services Advisory Committee.
FROM: Joyce Johnston -Carlson
I request Ruth Stanbridge, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, sign the
contract between Indian River County and Public Solutions, LLC (Robin Clements) for needs
assessment.
,ank
you,/
ce J. ston-Carlson, Director
Human Services
MAY 21, 2002
1
-68-
1
.500
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously authorized the Chairman to execute
the Consultant Agreement with Public Solutions,
LLC, as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES
None.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
MAY 21, 2002
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried the
Board adjourned at 10:04 a.m. '
9zt,
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Minutes Approved: : //