HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/11/2002MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 2002 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman
Fran B Adams
Caroline D Ginn
Kenneth R Macht
District 2
District 4
District 1
District 5
District 3
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. Fran B. Adams
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
1. Add Item 7.H., Out -of -County Travel for Commissioner Ginn - Community Leaders Breakfast.
2. Additional Backup Received for Item 13.C., Commissioner Adams - Agenda Protocol.
3. Add Item 14.B , Solid Waste Disposal District - Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Waste Tire Grant Application.
BACKUP
PAGES
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of May 21, 2002
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1) Fellsmere Water Control District Map
2) Delta Farms Water Control District Meeting
Schedule for the Year Endmg 09/30/02
3) Delta Farms Water Control District budget for FY
2002/03, resulting in a per acre assessment of 3150
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
B Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated May 30, 2002)
C. State Revenue Sharing Application
(memorandum dated June 4, 2002) 13-17
D Request for Budget Amendment
(letter dated June 3, 2002) 18
E Final Payment and Release of Retainage — US Army
Engineer Research and Development Center
(memorandum dated June 3, 2002) 19-21
F. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 014
(memorandum dated June 5, 2002) 21A -21B
BACKUP
PAGES
1-12
G. Request to Surplus Computer Equipment
(memorandum dated June 5, 2002) 21C
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
County Initiated Request to Rezone all RM -3 and RM -4
zoned Properties in the Unincorporated Area of the North
Barrier Island North of CR510 to RS -3 or RS -6
[FIRST HEARING] (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated May 31, 2002)
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Brian Heady — Comments
(letter dated May 22, 2002)
2. Request from Proctor Barber to speak concerning
the beach sand project
(memorandum received June 3, 2002)
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
:r
22-36
37
38
5.
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B. Emergency Services
None
C. General Services
1. Partial Release of Retainage — Chilberg
Construction Co., Inc. — North County Library
(memorandum dated June 5, 2002)
2. IRC Bid $4054 Sebastian Water Assessment
8" Water Main — Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated May 30, 2002)
3. IRC Bid #4053 Main Street Professional
Building — 12" Water Main — Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated May 30, 2002)
4. Contract for Architectural Services with Edlund
& Dritenbas, Architects — Re -Roofing of County
Jail
(memorandum dated June 5, 2002)
D. Leisure Services
None
E Office of Management and Budget
None
Human Resources (formerly Personnel)
Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting
(memorandum dated June 4, 2002)
G. Public Works
None
H. Utilities
1. West Side Subdivision Petition Water Service
(memorandum dated June 3, 2002)
•
BACKUP
PAGES
39-44
45-80
81-116
117-151
152
153-160
2. Florida Ridge Subdivision Water Service
(memorandum dated June 3, 2002) 161-180
keI
BACKUP
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS PAGES
I. Human Services
HUD Grant
(letter dated June 4, 2002) 181-186
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Updates
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Agenda Protocol
(backup provided separately)
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Proclamations
(memorandum dated June 5, 2002
187-189
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
Solid Waste Disposal District
None
Environmental Control Board
None
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://bcc1.co.indian-river.fl.us
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting maybe broadcast live on AT & 7' Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00
p m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m.
Meeting broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JUNE 11, 2002
CALL TO ORDER -1 _
INVOCATION -1-
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -1-
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS -2-
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS -2-
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 21, 2002 -2-
CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. Reports -3-
7 B List of Warrants -3-
7.C. State Revenue Sharing Application - Florida Department of Revenue -
Sheriff - Emergency Services -12-
7.D. Sheriff - Request for Budget Amendment - Ford Cargo Van -13-
JUNE 11, 2002
7 E PEP Reef Monitoring - US Army Engineer Research and Development
Center - Final Payment and Release of Retainage -14-
7.F. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #014 (Transportation Fund and General
Fund/Human Resources) -16-
7.G. Computer Equipment - Request to Donate Surplus Equipment -18-
7.H. After -the -Fact Out -of -County Travel Approval for Commissioner Ginn to
Attend the 2002 Community Leaders Breakfast - June 6, 2002 at the
Kennedy Space Center -19-
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - COUNTY INITIATED REQUEST TO REZONE
ALL RM -3 AND RM -4 ZONED PROPERTIES IN THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE NORTH BARRIER ISLAND
NORTH OF CR -510 TO RS -3 OR RS -6 (FIRST HEARING) - (Quasi -
Judicial) -20-
9 B 1 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - BRIAN HEADY - COMMENTS . -29-
9 B 2 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - PROCTOR BARBER - CONCERNING
THE BEACH SAND PROJECT -30-
11.C.1.
NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY - CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO.,
INC. - EDLUND DRITENBAS ARCHITECTS - PARTIAL RELEASE
OF RETAINAGE -31-
JUNE 11, 2002
BE{
-2-
•
11.C.2.
•
BID #4054 - SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT - 8" WATER MAIN
- MAXWELL CONTRACTING
-33-
11.C.3. BID #4053 - MAIN STREET PROFESSIONAL BUILDING - 12"
WATER MAIN - MAXWELL CONTRACTING
-35-
11.C.4. COUNTY JAIL RE -ROOFING - EDLUND DRITENBAS - CONTRACT
FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
-37-
11.F.
37-11.F. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY MEETING - TEAMSTERS
L OCAL 769 (PARAMEDICS AND LABOR & TRADES) AND IAFF
L OCAL 2201 (FIREFIGHTERS)
-38-
11.H.1. WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION - PETITION WATER SERVICE -39-
11.H.2. FLORIDA RIDGE SUBDIVISION - PETITION WATER SERVICE
-42-
INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC. - 2002
CONTINUUM OF CARE SUPER NOFA (Notice of Funding Availability)
HUD GRANT (1. MARTIN COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE {For Information
Only}; 2. ALCOHOPE TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE;
AND 3. THE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT)
-44-
JUNE 11, 2002
-3-
•
1
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES -48-
13.C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B ADAMS - AGENDA PROTOCOL -48-
13.D. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE D. GINN - PROCLAMATIONS -49-
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT -53-
14 B SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT -53-
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD -53-
JUNE 11, 2002
•
June 11, 2002
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners oflndian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman; John W.
Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B Adams; Caroline D. Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht. Also
present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney;
and Patricia "PJ" Jones, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Stanbridge called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Commissioner Ginn delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Adams led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
JUNE 11, 2002
•
-1-
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Stanbridge requested the following changes to today's Agenda:
1. Add Item 7.H., After -the -Fact Out -of -County Travel Approval for
Commissioner Ginn to Attend the 2002 Community Leaders Breakfast
2. Add Additional Backup to Item 13.C., Commissioner Fran B. Adams, Agenda
Protocol.
3 Add Item 14.B., Solid Waste Disposal District, 2002-03 Waste Tire Recycling
Grant Application - Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously made the above changes to the
Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
None.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MAY 21, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of May 21, 2002. There were none.
JUNE 11, 2002
-2-
•
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of May 21, 2002, as written.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. REPORTS
The following have been received and are on file in the office of the Clerk to the
Board:
1. Fellsmere Water Control District Map
2. Delta Farms Water Control District Meeting Schedule for the Year Ending
09/30/02
3 Delta Farms Water Control District Budget for FY 2002-03, Resulting in a Per
Acre Assessment of $150
7.B. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30, 2002:
TO:
HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: May 30, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM: EDWIN M. FRY., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of
County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
JUNE 11, 2002
-3-
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board,
for the time period of May 24, 2002 to May 30,2002.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved the list of Warrants as issued by the Clerk
to the Board for May 24-30, 2002, as recommended
by staff.
CHECK
NUMBER
0021775
0021776
0312356
0316544
0319876
0321974
0322909
0323010
0323950
0324109
0324110
0324111
0324112
0324113
0324114
0324115
0324116
0324117
0324118
O 324119
0324120
O 324121
0324122
0324123
0324124
0324125
0324126
0324127
0324126
0324129
0324130
0324131
0324132
0324133
0324134
0324135
0324136
0324137
0324138
0324139
0324140
0324141
0324142
JUNE 11, 2002
NAME
UNUMPROVIDENT INSURANCE
THE GUARDIAN
HERNANDEZ, JUDITH ESQ
BLUE SHIELD OUT OF STATE SUPP
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
BRODNER, MD ROBERT A
GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST
ANDERSON, FRED
BROXTON, LYDIA
BAXTER, JERE L
BEUTTELL, PETER M
SILKEN GROUP
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHRTY
BROWN, HUBERT
BABCOCK, DEAN
BROWN, KIMBERLY AND FPL
CORR, RHODA L
C P E ASSOCIATES
CAPAK, GERALD T
CARONE, PAUL
CAPPELLUTI, RICHARD
CARLUCCI, LEONARD A
DOOLITTLE,JAMES A & ASSOCIATES
DOVE, E WILSON
DOYLE, CHERYL
DEEHAN, WILLIAM F
DESRUISSEAUX, N ROB
EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
EVANS, ALFRED
FOGERTY, GEORGE A
FOGARTY ENTERPRISES, INC
FORD, ROBERT J
GASKILL, ROBERT
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
GRACE'S LANDING LTD
HOLM, LEO
RUNLET, J MICHAEL
HODGES, GINA
HUITRON, GLORIA
-4-
CHECK
DATE
2002-05-29
2002-05-29
2001-10-31
2002-01-24
2002-03-21
2002-04-25
2002-05-09
2002-05-09
2002-05-23
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,984.23
9,764.14
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
258.00
233.00
275.00
278.00
731.00
230.00
176.00
2,847.54
912.00
232.00
18.00
245.00
5,179.00
413.00
372.00
379.00
392.00
2,241.00
298.00
292.00
304.00
368.00
359.00
267.00
288.00
66.00
388.00
282.00
7,009.00
6,553.00
410.00
481.00
306.00
240.00
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
• •
0324143 JAMES A DOOLITTLE & ASSCCIATES
0324144 JULIN, PAUL
0324145 JOHNSTON, PATTIE
0324146 JACKOWSKI, MICHAEL
0324147 JONES, NICKETA AND FPL
0324148 JACKSON, RONALD
0324149 JONES, ALPHONSO
0324150 KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA
0324151 LAWRENCE, TERRY A
0324152 LANGLEY,.PHILIP G
0324153 LLERENA, EDWARD D
0324154 LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
0324155 LAPPERT, ANN OR RONALD
0324156 LEIFER, BRUCE
0324157 LEWIS, CHARLES
0324158 M 0 D INVESTMENTS
0324159 MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
0324160 MALGERIA, PRISCILLA
0324161 MEAD, THOMAS H OR HELEN S
0324162 NORMAN, DOUGLAS OR BARBARA
0324163 ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND
0324164 PICKERILL, JOHN
0324165 PALMER TRAILER PARK
0324166 PIERSON, JOHN H DBA
0324167 PALUMBO, LOUIS
0324168 PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF
0324169 REAGAN, WILLIE C
0324170 RAUDENBUSH, ERNEST
0324171 RIVER PARK PLACE
0324172 ST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACH
0324173 SCROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
0324174 SACCO, JACQUELINE AND/OR
0324175 STUART HOUSING AUTHORITY
0324176 SANDY PINES
0324177 SHELTON, ROBERT L
0324178 SANGBUSH, DONALD
0324179 STARCK, MICHAEL R
0324180 STRIBLING, WILLIAM JR
0324181 SUNDMAN, IVAN
0324182 TOWN & COUNTRY LEASING
0324183 THERIEN, RICHARD C
0324184 ULISKY, WILLIAM B AND
0324185 VERO FIRST CORPORATION
0324186 VALENTINO, ANTHONY E
0324187 BLARE, SALLIE (WYNN)
0324188 WALTERS, KEVIN
0324189 WOODIN, RICHARD
0324190 WILLIAMS, EDITH
0324191 WESSENDORF, FRED
0324192 WOODS OF VERO BEACH
0324193 YORK, LILLY B
0324194 YORK, DAVID
0324195 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
0324196 ACE PLUMBING, INC
0324197 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
0324198 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
0324199 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
0324200 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY
0324201 ATLANTIC REPORTING
0324202 ABS PUMPS, INC
0324203 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
0324204 ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER, INC
0324205 A T & T
0324206 AMERIGAS
0324207 ALBERTSON'S #4357
0324208 ANTHONY BAIL BONDS
JUNE 11, 2002
-5-
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-24
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
3,127.00
386.00
323.00
360.00
34.00
497.00
312.00
255.00
182.00
757.00
323.00
9,098.00
307.00
468.00
266.00
995.00
234.00
434.00
328.00
372.00
906.59
341.00
277.00
308.00
573.00
440.59
1,137.00
292.00
6,978.00
3,160.00
313.00
298.00
424.59
7,399.00
205.00
414.00
387.00
275.00
371.00
246.00
307.00
37.00
1,138.00
355.00
314.00
344.00
391.00
286.00
459.00
8,259.00
249.00
408.00
452.75
876.41
262.50
6.98
1,167.43
25.04
175.75
25.00
137.00
716.04
19.23
55.05
956.02
2,424.62
•
0324209 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO
0324210 A T & T
0324211 ATLANTIC COAST ANESTHESIA
0324212 AVERY DENNISON CORP
0324213 ATLANTIC COAST ENTERPRISES,INC
0324214 AHEAD HEADGEAR INC
0324215 AMJ EQUIPMENT CORP
0324216 ASSOCIATES IN PSYCHIATRY
0324217 ARMY/NAVY OUTDOORS
0324218 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS & BLUE
0324219 ASSOCIATES HOME HELATH
0324220 ALARM PARTNERS
0324221 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
0324222 BETTER BUSINESS FORMS, INC
0324223 BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
0324224 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS, INC
0324225 BLANCHARD MACHINERY
0324726 BRAD SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC
0324227 BAKER & TAYLOR INC
0324228 BRODART CO
0324229 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
0324230 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
0324231 BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC
0324232 BLAKESLEE MAINTENANCE
0324233 BELLSOUTH
0324234 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
0324235 BREVARD REHABILITATION MED
0324236 BREVARD ORTHHOPAEDIC CLINIC
0324237 BALDWIN, WILLIAM H
0324238
0324239
0324240
0324241
0324242
0324243
0324244
0324245
0324246
0324247
0324248
0324249
0324250
0324251
0324252
0324253
0324254
0324255
0324256
0324257
0324258
0324259
0324260
0324261
0324262
0324263
0324264
0324265
0324266
0324267
0324268
0324269
0324270
0324271
0324272
0324273
0324274
JUNE 11, 2002
BRADY, CHARLES
BELLSOUTH
BELLSOUTH
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
CAREER TRACK SEMINARS
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
CHEMSEARCH
CONTRACT SERVICE
CLAY'S ASPHALT MAINTENANCE, INC
CONTROL CENTER, INC
CALL ONE, INC
CUES, INC
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
CLASSIC TREE SERVICE OF VERO
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC &
CHARLIE'S LAWN MAINTENANCE INC
CUTTER & BUCK
CENTRAL LOCATING SERVICE, LTD
CHUI, KWAI LEUNG
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
DELTA SUPPLY CO
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
DIRECTOR, KENNETH L MD PA
DOW, HOWELL, GILMORE,
DATA SUPPLIES, INC
DIVE RESCUE INT'L, INC
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
DADE PAPER COMPANY
DESIGNED TRAFFIC
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
DILLARD, CASSIE
DIGITAL TECHNOGRAPHICS, INC
DELO, JOEY
-6-
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
147.30
539.25
398.74
6,236.00
71,847.03
2,534.79
904.64
46.00
74.24
50.00
375.00
863.00
120.00
534.71
213,108.83
118.80
906.60
10,432.80
609.55
27.91
456.94
90.18
67.45
200.00
385.97
425.61
423.00
360.00
574.83
10.45
20.00
87.52
33,573.89
149.00
1,160.90
760.92
3,570.00
4,900.00
21,600.00
25.00
223.00
16.25
2,710.00
115.83
37.00
3,833.70
39.00
886.50
792.86
64.97
19.52
2,404.49
386.25
1,939.77
170.00
3,089.40
182.79
1,015.91
16.16
405.00
485.54
4,199.57
65.40
38.63
88.00
203.45
0324275
0324276
0324277
0324278
0324279
0324280
0324281
0324282
0324283
0324284
0324285
0324286
0324287
0324288
0324289
0324290
0324291
0324292
0324293
0324294
0324295
0324296
0324297
0324298
0324299
0324300
0324301
0324302
0324303
0324304
0324305
0324306
0324307
0324308
0324309
0324310
0324311
0324312
0324313
0324314
0324315
0324316
0324317
0324318
0324319
-0324320
0324321
0324322
0324323
0324324
0324325
0324326
0324327
0324328
0324329
0324330
0324331
0324332
0324333
0324334
0324335
0324336
0324337
0324338
0324339
JUNE 11, 2002
DELL MARKETING L.P.
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
EVERGLADES FARM
FEDEX
FIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
F W &PCO A
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
FLORIDA USSSA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH
FIRSTLAB
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
FIRST LAB
FLESCHER, ROSEMARY
FERRELLGAS
GALE GROUP, THE
GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
GALL'S INC
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
GREENE, ROBERT E
GOLFNET, INC
GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER
GOLDCOAST ANESTHESIA ASSOC
GREAT -FULLY DEAD PEST MGMT INC
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
HILL MANUFACTURING
HACH COMPANY
HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
HOWARD, JEFFREY
HEALTHSOUTH HOLDINGS
HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENTER
HARRIS, GREGORY PHD CVE
HYDRANUATICS
HAMILTON, DUSTIN
HOGAN'S REXALL DRUGS
HOLLEY, MD.,DANIEL T
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY, INC
INIDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
IMI -NET, INC
INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES
INDIAN RIVER SURGICAL ASSOC
INDIAN RIVER HAND REHAB INC
INDIAN RIVER WALK-IN CARE
JIMMY'S TREE SERVICE, INC
JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
JARA, INC
J F MEYERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR
J & M SOD
KURTZ, ERIC C MD
7-
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
5,531.00
56.00
2,826.82
3,508.67
90.61
88.03
4,434.00
700.00
49,208.33
478.65
7,930.43
74.71
95.00
6,315.50
80.00
452.00
28.00
2,468.91
685.07
313.00
2,328.81
65.00
155.00
12.00
420.48
1,002.12
138.95
174.88
236.69
58.58
1,976.56
118.00
8,178.87
550.37
759.00
136.11
183.25
636.90
3,976.54
798.00
29.30
548.00
344.97
471.90
27,971.66
92.70
50.45
52.00
62,132.16
448.45
150.00
300.23
2,010.24
1,106.00
1,856.25
75.00
1,031.40
467.00
425.00
995.00
708.50
409.00
14,696.00
2,625.00
59.00
rir
•
O 324340 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING
0324341 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL
O 324342 KELLY, JULIE
0324343 K S M ENGINEERING & TESTING
0324344 LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
0324345 L B SMITH, INC
0324346 LABOR FINDERS
0324347 LINEAR DYNAMICS INC
0324348 LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO
0324349 LANDERS & PARSONS, PA
O 324350 LIONS CLUB OF SEBASTIAN INC
0324351 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
0324352 INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
0324353 MIKES GARAGE
0324354 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES, INC
0324355 METAL CULVERTS
0324356 MILLER, JERRY D
0324357 MCCULLERS, MIKE
O 3243758 MEDICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC
0324359 MURPHY, DEBBIE
0324360 MEDICINE SHOPPE
0324361 MAILAMS, JOHN H, PHD
0324362 NOLTE, DAVID C
0324363 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
0324364 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO
0324365 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0324366 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
0324367 NATIONAL RESIDENTIAL
0324368 NOWLIN, TIAIRA
O 324369 NEW LIFE REHAB INC
0324370 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
0324371 OFFICE DEPOT, INC
0324372 ON ITS WAY
0324373 PARAGON ELECTRIC, INC
0324374 PARRS RENTAL INC
0324375 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
0324376 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
0324377 PETTY CASH
0324378 POSTMASTER
0324379 P B S & J
0324380 PERKINS MEDICAL SUPPLY
0324381 PETTY CASH
0324382 PORT CONSOLIDATED
0324383 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
6324384 PUBLIX PHARMACY #0642
0324385 PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE
0324386 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING SVC
0324387 PICKERING, REBECCA LMT
0324388 PERKINS PHARMACY
0324389 PETTY CASH
0324390 PFISTER, NANCY
0324391 POWER & SYSTEMS INNOVATIONS
0324392 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
0324393 RINGHAVER EQUIPMENT CO
0324394 RINKER MATERIALS
0324395 RIEDEL, VICTOR
0324396 RICHMOND HYDRAULICS INC
0324397 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
0324398 RIORDAN, MICHAEL C PSY.D.
0324399 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
0324400 R & G SOD FARMS
0324401 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
0324402 RELIABLE POLY JOHN SERVICES
0324403 ROCHA CONTROLS
0324404 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
0324405 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
JUNE 11, 2002
-8-
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
345.00
7,669.44
77.00
300.00
2,037.12
98.58
4,636.37
38,985.00
2,327.48
52.83
2,500.00
1,350.00
19,100.16
940.00
14.30
4,129.04
29.30
9.00
72.00
157.50
121.43
80.75
210,665.92
17.88
1,500.00
522.58
282.14
39,579.96
55.37
327.00
165.77
956.08
619.04
2,756.00
576.62
906.66
114.74
249.91
272.00
2,000.00
23.00
7.00
12,907.16
79.20
80.95
305.00
66.06
216.00
62.00
30.46
20.19
752.00
28.00
765.71
2,722.62
184.39
640.71
21,816.81
1,700.00
15.90
655.00
45.85
112.68
17,100.00
65.33.
225.10
•
0324406
0324407
0324408
0324409
0324410
0324411
0324412
0324413
0324414
0324415
0324416
0324417
0324418
0324419
0324420
0324421
0324422
0324423
0324424
0324425
0324426
0324427
0324428
0324429
0324430
0324431
0324432
0324433
0324434
0324435
0324436
0324437
0324438
0324439
0324440
0324441
0324442
0324443
0324444
0324445
0324446
0324447
0324448
0324449
0324450
0324451
0324452
0324453
0324454
0324455
0324456
0324457
0324458
0324459
0324460
0324461
0324462
0324463
0324464
0324465
0324466
0324467
JUNE 11, 2002
R S MEDICAL
RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES BREVARD
ROCKWOOD CORPORATION, THE
SAFETY KLEEN
SCOTT'S SPORTING GOODS
SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
SEXUAL ASSAULT ASSISTANCE
REBEL SOUTHERN
STANLEY STEEMER
STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE
STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
SKAGGS, PAUL MD
SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
SALEM PRESS, INC
SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
STAMBAUGH, JOHN
SAFETY COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH
SYSTEMATIC SERVICES, INC
SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
SCHOLASTIC, INC
SERVPRO
SUNTRUST BANK
SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE
SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC
SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST
SPACE COAST PATHOLOGISTS
SORIANO, SORCIRE
SCHIRARD, JENNIFER
STAAB,JOHN
SALMI, M I MD
SERRA, RACHEL
SUNNYTECH INC- FL
SATTELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC
SMITH & COMPANY, INC
SHELL CREDIT CARD CENTER
SEBASTIAN INLET ANESTHESIA
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD LLC
SENASYS
TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
TITLEIST
TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING
THOMSON LEARNING
SMITH, TERRY L
SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST
TREASURE COAST SPORTS
TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
TESTAMERICA INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
URGENT CARE WEST
URGENT CARE WEST
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
VERO ORTHOPAEDICS
VERO BEARING & BOLT
WADSWORTH, DENNIS "MITCH"
WILLHOFF, PATSY
-9-
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
64.00
669.00
285.50
381.84
1,397.64
44.26
4,964.16
274.04
59.95
19,959.38
26.94
1,448.00
9.00
1,278.89
1,604.70
93.56
792.75
29.30
195.00
12,650.00
347.50
450.17
281.50
193.27
614.88
23,567.96
73.50
250.00
500.00
19.00
26.97
500.00
8.17
34.04
38.63
271.58
157.80
1,196,606.97
43.86
215.09
4,780.31
138.36
6,615.94
5,201.74
2,517.15
39.62
11.92
291.28
2,668.84
55.96
24.00
12.85
35,700.31
927.00
957.00
5,476.55
9,462.50
124.91
1,180.19
143.54
29.30
130.00
0
2
•
03244
03244
03244
03244
03244
03244
03244
032447
032447
032447
032447
032447
032448
032448
032448
032448
032448
0324485
-0324486
0324487
0324488
0324489
0324490
0324491
0324492
0324493
0324494
0324495
0324496
0324497
0324498
0324499
0324500
0324501
0324502
0324503
0324504
0324505
0324506
0324507
0324508
0324509
0324510
0324511
0324512
0324513
0324514
0324515
0324516
0324517
0324518
0324519
0324520 B
0324521
0324522 KN
0324523 S
0324524 CO
0324525
0324526 EG
0324527 MC
0324528 PR
0324529 HU
0324530 DW
0324531 ONE
68 WHEATLEY, ALAN
69 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
70 WALGREEN COMPANY
71 WILSON, STEVEN
72 WEHRLE, RONALD
73 WILLIAMS, JUDY
74 WRIGHT, LAUREL
5 XEROX CORPORATION
6 MIDDLETON, GARY
7 BRANDON CAPITAL CORP
8 ESTRADA, EMMA DEAN
9 REAGAN, WILLIE
0 RIPE, PHILIP J
1 BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION
2 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
3 THE HILL GROUP INC
4 M G B CONSTRUCTION
WALSH, JEAN
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
RERAN, DEAN
MC DONALD, TONYA & ROBERT B
JUSTICE, MICHELLE
BROOKS, WELLESLEY
PARKS, IVAN
KUSCHEL, MICHAEL
FIELD, BRENTON & IRENE
CALL, JOHN & CONNIE
THOMAS JR., JEREMIAH
OLDS, STEVEN J
CRAWFORD JR., ROBERT L
M G B CONSTRUCTION
HERNDON, VICTORIA
GIBSON, CHRISTOPHER
RIVERHOUSE, INC
ALASCIO, TOM
ANDERSON, PATIENCE T
LANZENDORF, DIANA
COBURN, EUGENE
KELLY, CHAD
THE HILL GROUP
WILLIAMS, RANDALL E
PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES
WHITEHEAD, MRS WILLIAM R
ADAMS, ROBERT J
HARROLD, GARY & LYNN
SEA OARS INVESTMENT LTD
HARRIS, EDWARD
AMERITREND HOMES
SEA OAKS INVESTMENT LTD
ALTENBURG, RICHARD
HARTMAN, MURRAY P
NEAL, FRANK T
RACKETY, PARKER & ASSOC
COLNEY, JOHN C & KELLY
OWLES, DARRELL
OUCIE, HUBERT OR CLAIRE
PELAND, MARY J
CABANAS, ABRAHAM
ERTON PROPERTIES INC
DONALD PROPERTIES
OTH, P SHANNON
TCHINSON, KIMBERLY
INELL, JASON
IL, LINDA
JUNE 11, 2002
-10-
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
29.30
852.50
848.40
74.68
139.92
40.00
38.63
94.71
5,079.30
71.21
80.18
91.74
48.63
8.59
127.46
986.79
111.41
71.95
64.28
68.06
68.87
24.52
85.01
17.10
39.98
68.48
26.56
18.36
51.20
61.18
43.55
96.77
46.33
96.05
18.41
45.03
101.27
47.33
32.74
105.08
29.19
21.83
67.12
52.78
29.53
25.58
44.29
93.94.
67.45
18.30
41.09
91.62
50.31
63.41
49.01
53.94
82.65
8.88
20.81
56.52
45.44
45.73
67.21
83.81
•
032453
032453
032453
0324535
0324536
0324537
0324538
0324539
0324540
0324541
0324542
0324543
0324544
0324545
0324546
0324547
0324548
0324549
-0324550
0324551
0324552
0324553
0324554
0324555
0324556
0324557
0324558
0324559
2 GROSSMAN, ROBERT G
3 LOEWINGER, ROBERT J
4 TURNER, JANE R
EDDY, SCOTT A
RASMUSSEN, TAMARA J
SCHWARZ, STEPHEN
CATRON, PHILLIP
GUTHRIE, JAMES R
CAIRNS, GEORGE R
KEITH, JENNIFER
WHITTINGTON, MEGAN M
MITCHELL, JOHN A
HAGER, JARRETT
WADE, CHRISTINE
RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C
CASTELLANO, MARIE
COLON, HECTOR R
EVANS, JAMES
THOMSON, GEORGE
BARTOLUCCI, CHRISTINA
SKALA, DORIS
BRIGHT, STANLEY J
GUERRA, NORMA
HAEUSERMANN, PETER
FARMER, WILLIAM & PHYLLIS
MICHALSKI, DAN
HAZZARD, JOHN C
REYNOLDS, G P
BRINN, DENNIS
BAILEY, KATHY
COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
WHALLEY, DANIELLE
MACMILLAN, R J
MASTEC ITS
NORLING, BONNIE V
WYANT, FRANK
HANDY, CHRIS
WATSON, SHARON L
CITRUS BANK NA
0324560
0324561
0324562
0324563
0324564
0324565
0324566
0324567
0324568
0324569
0324570
JUNE 11, 2002
-11-
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
2002-05-30
41.56
72.70
50.00
18.77
29.69
29.44
12.14
47.34
32.98
38.59
52.24
37.17
43.14
27.56
58.86
43.58
41.23
28.37
66.54
22.61
33.64
57.67
58.50
7.01
36.45
69.30
41.32
55.35
33.75
21.74
934.79
44.33
23.24
251.05
42.66
64.90
49.14
37.80
20.78
2,507,248.48
L
•
7. C. STATE REVENUE SHARING APPLICATION - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE - SHERIFF - EMERGENCY SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 4, 2002:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: June 4, 2002
SUBJECT: State Revenue Sharing Application
FROM: Ed Fry, Finance Director
Background Information
Attached to this memorandum is the State Revenue Sharing application that must be filled in, signed,
and returned to the State by June 30, 2002. This application must be completed and filed on a timely
basis in order for the County to receive State Revenue Sharing funds. For the 2001 fiscal year, the
County received $2,386,538.97 in State Revenue Sharing funds. As of May 23, 2002, the County has
received $1,357,011.32.
The Sheriff and the Director of the Department of Emergency Services have completed and signed
the appropriate sections of the application The County has complied with all of the requirements set
forth m the application and has filed all reports that are required to be filed with the State. All
sections of the application have been completed and the application has been signed by the Chief
Fiscal Officer.
Requested Action
Request the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the State
Revenue Sharing application.
JUNE 11, 2002
_12_
��i
• •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
authorized the Chairman to sign the State Revenue
Sharing Application, as recommended by staff.
COPY OF APPLICATION WILL BE ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7.D. SHERIFF - REQUEST FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT - FORD CARGO VAN
The Board reviewed a letter of June 3, 2002:
sheriff
4055 41st AVENUE
June 3, 2002
ROY RAYMOND • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-1808 PHONE (561) 569-6700
The Honorable Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
Indian River Board of County Commissioners
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960-3394
Re: Budget Amendment
Dear Chairman Stanbridge:
This letter is a request to amend my fiscal year 2001-2002 Operating Budget. On April 13, my
office conducted a public auction of surplus property and vehicles. $46,845 net of expenses was
realized.
In keeping with past practice, I am requesting that those proceeds be used to increase my current
budget by $5,480 in operating expense and $41,005 in capital outlay.
JUNE 11, 2002
-13-
The proceeds will be used to acquire new property within the current fiscal year pursuant to
Chapter 274, Florida Statutes. The capital outlay funds will be used to purchase one Ford cargo
van for the transport of prisoners and like -kind equipment.
I have reduced the budget request for fiscal year 2003 by one vehicle (a $26,011 reduction).
Please place this item on the Consent Agenda at your earliest convenience. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Roy Raymond, Sheriff
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved the Sheriff's request to amend his fiscal
year 2001-2002 Operating Budget by an increase in
operating expense of $5,480 and in capital outlay of
$41,005, reducing his budget request for fiscal year
2003 by $26,011.
7.E. PEP REEF MONITORING - US ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CENTER - FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 3, 2002:
JUNE 11, 2002
-14-
• •
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P E
Public Works Director
CONSENT AGENDA
FROM: Jonathan C. Gorham, Ph.D. J G
Coastal Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Final Payment and Release of Retainage
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center
DATE: June 3, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Indian River County contracted with the US Army Corps of Engineers
to gather, compile and analyze data on the performance of the
Prefabricated Erosion Prevention (PEP) reef installed offshore of
the City of Vero Beach. The final report for the project was
approved by the Board on January 22, 2002. The attached invoice
represents the final payment and application for release of
retainage on this contract.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of the payment and release of retainage.
Retainage and final payment in the amount of $44,958.
JUNE 11, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved the payment and release of retainage in the
amount of $44,958, as recommended by staff.
-15-
I
7.F. MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT #014 (TRANSPOR TA TION FUND
AND GENERAL FUND/HUMANRESOURCES)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 5, 2002:
To: Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
Through: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
From. Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Date: June 5, 2002
Subject: Miscellaneous
Budget Amendment 014
Description and Conditions
The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following.
1. Traffic Engineenng and Engineering each need to replace a vehicle during the current year.
The attached entry appropriates funding necessary for these replacements.
2. Human Resources department salary expenditures are projected to exceed the budgeted
amount for this fiscal year. The attached entry appropriates funding from General Fund
contingencies.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
JUNE 11, 2002
-16-
• •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved Miscellaneous Budget Amendment #014,
as recommended by staff.
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
From: Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
Budget Amendment: 014
Date: June 5, 2002
JUNE 11, 2002
-17-
Entry
Number
Fund/ Department/
Account Mate
Account Number
Increase
Decrease
1.
Expenses
Transportation
Engineering/
Fund/ Traffic
Automotive
111-245-541-066.42
$40,000
$0
Transportation
Automotive
Fund/ Engineenng/
111-244-541-066.42
$14,000
$0
Transportation Fund/ Reserve for
Contingencies
111-199-581-099.91
$0
$54,000
2.
Expenses
General
Regular
Fund/ Human Resources/
Salaries
001-203-513-011.12
$9,154
$0
General
Social
Fund/ Human Resources/
Security
001-203-513-012.11
$568
$0
General Fund/ Human Resources/
Retirement Contnbution
001-203-513-012.12
$527
$0
General Fund/ Human Resources/
Insurance
001-203-513-012 13
$35
$0
General Fund/
Worker's Compensation
Human Resources/
001-203-513-012.14
$50
$0
General Fund/ Human
Medicare Matching
Resources/
001-203-513-012.17
$133
$0
General
Contingencies
Fund/ Reserve
for
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$10,467
JUNE 11, 2002
-17-
7. G. COMPUTER EQUIPMENT - REQUEST TO DONATE SURPLUS EQUIPMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 5, 2002:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of County Commissioners
Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator
June 5, 2002
Request to Surplus Computer Equipment
Staff requests permission to donate any and all computer equipment (monitors, printers,
etc.) which is declared surplus, to any non-profit organization which may be interested. Indian
River County has been unable to dispose of the surplus computer equipment through the regular
surplus sales.
JUNE 11, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved staffs request to donate any and all
computer equipment declared surplus to any non-
profit organization which may be interested.
-18-
• •
7.H. AFTER -THE -FACT OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL APPROVAL FOR
COMMISSIONER GINN TO ATTEND THE 2002 COMMUNITY LEADERS
BREAKFAST - JUNE 6, 2002 AT THE KENNEDY SPACE CENTER
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 10, 2002:
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: June 10, 2002
Subject: AFTER THE FACT TRAVEL
From. Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner
I attended the 2002 Community Leaders Breakfast held on June 6, 2002 at the Kennedy
Space Center and am requesting reimbursement for travel incurred to this event.
JUNE 11, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
approved out -of -county travel for Commissioner
Ginn to attend the 2002 Community Leaders
Breakfast on June 6, 2002 at the Kennedy Space
Center, as requested.
-19-
9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - COUNTY INITIATED REQUEST TO
REZONE ALL RM -3 AND RM -4 ZONED PROPERTIES IN THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE NORTH BARRIER
ISLAND NORTH OF CR -510 TO RS -3 OR RS -6 (FIRST
HEARING) - (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 31, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert . Keating, AIC
Community Developme t Dire4't
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP C
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Randy Deshazo; Planner, Long -Range Planning j
DATE: May 31, 2002
RE• County Initiated Request to Rezone all RM -3 and RM -4 zoned Properties in
the Unincorporated area of the North Barrier Island north of CR 510 to RS -
3 or RS -6 (RZON 2001-02-0097) [FIRST HEARING]
It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 11, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This is a county initiated request to rezone approximately 120 acres of residential property in the
unincorporated area of the North Barrier Island from Multiple -Family Residential districts (RM -
3 and RM -4) to Single -Family Residential districts (RS -3 and RS -6, respectively). Of these 120
acres approximately 115 acres, consisting of 62 Lots are zoned RM -3, while the remaining five
acres consisting of three lots, are zoned RM -4.
JUNE 11, 2002
-20-
•
The subject properties, depicted in the figure below, are located north of CR 510, mostly on the
east side of AIA. As shown in the figure, the subject properties have been grouped into two
areas' Area 1 comprises all of the RM -3 zoned properties and Area 2 comprises the RM -4 zoned
properties.
The purpose of the rezoning is to ensure that future development on the North Bather Island will
be compatible with surrounding land uses, which are predominantly single-family residential
developments.
Back ound
In 2001, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to rezone all multi -family zoned
properties on the North Barrier Island north of CR 510 to single-family residential districts.
Since the board's directive involves a county initiated, rather than a property owner initiated,
rezoning action staff sent a letter to all affected property owners on May 8, 2001 to ask if they
support the proposed rezoning. In response to that letter, only one property owner indicated that
he opposed the rezoning, and that owner has since sold his property. One other owner indicated
that he had questions regarding the proposed rezoning, and staff contacted that owner. The owner
stated that he had concerns regarding how the rezoning might impact potential future
development of his property, and staff informed him that the rezoning would not impact future
development on his property, given the small size and particular configuration of the parcel.
On May 9, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the Board
of County Conunissioners approve this request.
Rezonin Procedures
State law provides special requirements for county initiated rezonings that involve more than 10
acres, such as the subject request. Among those special requirements are the following:
o The Board must hold two advertised public hearings, one of which must be after 5 00
P.M. on a week day unless the Board by a majority plus one vote elects to conduct that
hearing at another time of day; and
o The second Board hearing must be held at least 10 days after the first Board hearing and
must be advertised at least five days prior to the second hearing.
This is the first rezoning public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. At this
hearing, the Board will consider the request and provide direction to staff. If approved by a
majority plus one vote of the Board, the second rezoning public hearing will be held at the
regular scheduled Board meeting on July 9, 2002.
JUNE 11, 2002
-21-
•
Multiple -Family
Zoned Areas
Atlantic
Ocean
Area 1: RM -3
assisislar.
GOV. LOT 0
fitia i-slss®sassmis
GOV. LOT 9
Area 1: Existing Land Use Pattern
Most of the subject properties comprising Area 1 consist of undeveloped land. Of those
properties which are developed, single-family subdivisions predominate. Subdivisions that will
be rezoned are Windsor Beachside, Sanderling, and Ocean Bluff. Directly south of Ocean Bluff
is Treasure Shores park. Abutting the Area 1 subject properties to the north and west, land is
zoned RS -3 West of the subject properties are the Windsor Planned Development, and the
Wabasso Estates, Turtle Cove, and Ocean Way subdivisions The Town of Orchid lies to the
southwest of the Area 1 subject properties. To the east lies the Atlantic Ocean.
JUNE 11, 2002
-22-
Area 2: Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject properties comprising Area 2 consist of a single-family residence and undeveloped
land. The Town of Orchid lies directly north of the subject properties To the south and west of
the Area 2 subject properties, land is zoned RS -6, single-family residential (up to 6 units/acre)
and contains the Spring Place and Summerplace subdivisions. To the southwest, land is zoned
RT -6, transitional single-family residential (up to 6 units/acre) and contains the Oceanaire
Heights subdivision. To the east lies the Atlantic Ocean
Area 1: Future Land Use Pattern
The subject properties comprising Area 1 are designated L-1, Low -Density Residential -1, and
REC, Recreation, on the Future Land Use Map. The REC designation does not permit any
residential development. Land to the north and west of Area 1 is also designated L-1. The L-1
designation permits residential uses with densities of up to 3 units/acre. To the south lies the
Town of Orchid.
Area 2: Future Land Use Pattern
The subject properties compnsing Area 2 are designated L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, on the
Future Land Use Map. The L-2 designation permits residential uses with densities of up to 6
units/acre. To the north of Area 2 lies the Town of Orchid, while land to the south and west is
designated L-2.
Environment
Most of the subject properties contain wooded lots with saw palmetto, live oak, cabbage palm,
seagrape, sea oats, and beach bean In addition, Brazilian pepper is also found on many sites and
competes with desirable native species. While there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the subject
properties, the Flood Insurance Rating Maps indicate that many of the subject properties contain
flood hazard areas.
Utilities and Services
The subject properties are located within the Urban Service Area of the county. Water lines
extend from the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant along A1A. Wastewater lines extend from
the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant along Al north to the southern tip of Treasure
Shores park.
Transportation System
Both Areas are, generally, bounded on the west by A1A. Classified as a rural minor arterial
roadway on the future roadway thoroujhfare plan map, this segment of A1A is a two-lane road
with 100 feet of public road right-of-way. No expansion of this segment of A1A is programmed.
ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. The
analysis will include a description of:
o Concurrency of public facilities;
o Compatibility with the surrounding area;
o Consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
o Potential impact on environmental quality.
JUNE 11, 2002
-23-
01/
•1I
4.
IP
Concurrency of Public Facilities
The subject properties are located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suites
for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation,
Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation. The adequate provision of
these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community
The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the
minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
_Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is required
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning district. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned:
2. Land -Use Designations:
3. Existing Zoning Districts:
4. Proposed Zoning Districts:
±120 acres
REC, Recreation, (zero density),
L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 (up to 3 units/acre) and
L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre).
RM -3 and RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential Districts
RS -3 and RS -6, Single -Family Residential Districts
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land
Development Regulations, projects that do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt
from concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review
because the requested zoning would not increase the potential number of units that could be built
on the subject properties.
In the north area (Area 1), there will be no increase in the potential number of units because the
currently RM -3 zoned properties will be rezoned to RS -3 Since both distracts allow up to 3
units/acre, there would be no increase m density. In fact, the actual dwelling unit yield for
regular single-family subdivisions under RS -3 zoning is between 2 and 2 5 units per acre, while
the yield for multi -family projects under RM -3 zoning can be as much as 3 units per acre. For
this reason, the Area 1 rezoning will result in a decrease in allowable net density Furthermore,
approximately 53 acres of the RM -3 zoned subject properties are publicly owned lands
designated as REC, recreation, on the Future Land Use Map. These properties will never be
developed for residential purposes, regardless of zoning.
Similarly, the proposed zoning in the south area (Area 2) will not result in a density increase.
While the Area 2 rezoning request involves rezoning properties from RM -4 (up to 4 units/acre)
to RS -6 (up to 6 units/acre), only three parcels will be affected. Because of the small sizes and
particular configurations of those lots, the RS -6 zoning will result in an effective decrease in
density The density decrease is attributable to the fewer units that can be built on those parcels
with single-family zoning than could be built on them if they remained at their multi -family
designation.
In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with any new
development project on any of the subject properties. That concurrency analysis will address
facility service levels and demand.
JUNE 11, 2002 011
-24-
3
i
•
Compatibility with the Surrc;undir. Area
With the subject property located in an area that is dominated by single-family, low-density
development, compatibility is not a major concern for this request. Indeed, compatibility is the
reason for the rezoning request. Since land to the north and west of Area 1 is currently zoned
RS -3, the rezoning of properties zoned RM -3 to RS -3 will result in a continuation of an existing
zoning pattern. For land currently zoned RM -4 (Area 2), surrounding properties are zoned RS -6
and RT -6, so the rezoning of that property to RS -6 will result in a continuation of an existing
zoning pattern as well. For these reasons, development of the subject property with single-family
residential development will be compatible with surrounding areas.
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive
plan. Rezonmgs must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on
the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and
commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are
located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan.
Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to
direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies
provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan
policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests.
Of particular applicability for this request are Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.41,
and Objective 11 of the Coastal Management Element.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.11 states that the Low -Density Residential Land Use
designations shall be applied to those areas which are suitable for urban and suburban scale
development, and shall be limited to lands that are located within the Urban Service Area and
near existing urban centers Since the subject properties are suitable for urban and suburban
scale development, and are located within the Urban Service Area, the request is consistent with
Future Land Use Element Policy 1 11.
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.41
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.41 states that the Board of County Commissioners recognizes
that not every zoning district allowed in a land use designation is appropriate for every site
within that land use designation. Since the subject properties are adjacent to other single-family
areas and are separated from major conunercial and industrial areas, single-family zoning is
appropriate.
-Coastal Management Element Objective 11
Coastal Management Element Objective 11 states that the county will not allow an increase in
the density of land use within the Coastal High Hazard Area (an area containing the subject
properties). Even though the rezoning request includes a change from RM -4 to RS -6 in Area 2,
the maximum yield for dwelling units in regular single-family subdivisions zoned RS -6 is four
units per acre; therefore, the rezoning would result in an even swap in allowed density.
Consequently, this request is consistent with Objective -11 of the Coastal Management Element
of the comprehensive plan.
JUNE 11, 2002��
-2�-
•
While Future Land Use Element. Policies 1.11, 1 41 and Coastal Management Element Objective
11 are particularly applicable to this request other comprehensive plan policies and
also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all
applicable plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the
request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Potential 1mact on Environmental •ual
Environmental protection regulations are the same for both multiple -family and single-family
zoning districts Those regulations require that, prior to residential development of a site, the
developer complete an environmental survey to determine the extent of any jurisdictional
wetlands on site. That survey must be approved by the county s environmental planning staff
Any jurisdictional wetlands determined to be located on the parcel are regulated by federal, state,
and county agencies.
A survey of listed species would also be required prior to development of the site. If that survey
found any listed species, the developer would be required to coordinate with the appropriate state
and federal agencies.
Therefore, there will be no additional negative impact on environmental resources associated
with this request.
CONCLUSION
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area, and is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. Rezoning the properties to single-family
residential districts will have no negative impacts on environmental quality or the provision of
public facilities and services. The subject properties are located in an area deemed suitable for
low-density, single-family residential development. The request meets all applicable criteria.
For those reasons staff supports the request.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis, the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners consider this request and:
o Provide direction to staff; and
o Vote to hold the second public hearing at the Board's regular meeting on July 9, 2002.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Summary Page
2. Rezoning Application
3. Unapproved Minutes of' the May 9, 2002, meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission
4. Rezoning ordinance (to be adopted at the July 9, 2002, Board meeting)
JUNE 11, 2002
-26-
•
•
SUMMARY PAGE
GENERAL
Applicant: Indian River County
Location: Mostly east of AlA, north of CR 510 on the North Barrier Island
Acreage* 120
Land Use Designation* REC, Recreation (zero density), L-1, Low Density Residential (up
to 3 units/acre) and L-2, Low Density Residential (up to 6 units/acre).
Existing Zoning: 115 acres of RM -3 Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 3
units/ac.) & 5 acres of RM -4, Multiple -Family Residential District
(up to 4 units/1 ac.)
Requested Zoning: RS -3 and RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/ac
and up to 6 units/acre.)
Existing Land Use: Subdivisions, single-family home, wooded lots, county owned
parks
ADJACENT LAND
North: Single-family subdivisions
South: Single-family subdivisions
East Atlantic Ocean
West Single-family subdivisions; zoned RS -3, RS -6.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Water and sewer available; access from A1A
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
Flood hazard areas
PUBLIC
NOTIFICATION
Planning and
Zoning
Staff Contact:
Randy
Deshazo
Board of County Commissioners
(first public hearing)
Randy Deshazo
Date Advertised:
•
April 26, 2002
May 31, 2002
# of Surrounding
Property
Owner and Property
Owner
Notifications:
137
137
Date Notification
Mailed*
April 23, 2002
May 10, 2002
Date Sign Posted:
April 23, 2002
May 29, 2002
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff supports the request
JUNE 11, 2002
-27-
1/
•
•
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the proposal for the Board
and noted that letters had gone out to all property owners. One owner had been opposed to
the project but has since sold that property. A concurrence with the project has also been
received from the Windsor development.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
Bill Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, noted that the North Beach Civic Association had
supported this rezoning for some time as a result of a project to build a 60 -foot
condominium among single-family homes. Since that time there have been several lawsuits
and the property belonging to the one opposing owner has been purchased as a buffer area.
Bob Johnson, Coral Wind, questioned whether this change would mean that multi-
family zoning would be moved to South County or Fellsmere, and Director Keating advised
there would be no change to any other areas of the County. There will be no additional
multi -family zoning because of this change.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard with regard to this matter.
There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
JUNE 11, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously approved a second public hearing at
the Board's regular meeting on Tuesday, July 9,
2002, as recommended by staff.
-28-
nv
Lrn
• •
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - BRIAN HEADY -
COMMENTS
The Board reviewed a letter of May 22, 2002:
Brian T. Heady
406 19'h Street
Vero Beach, FI 32960
May 22, 2002
Chairman, County Commission
Margaret Gunter
Indian River County Commission Members
Vero Beach Florida 32960
Dear County Commission Commissioners;
Please place me on the citizen input public discussion portion of your agenda for
the second meeting in June. I intend to speak to the Indian River County Commission
about answers that should be questioned answers that ask more questions. I will also
speak briefly about the obligation to uphold oaths of office with regard to these answers.
If you have any questions 1 can be reached by telephone at 778-1028.
Sincerely
Brian T. Heady
Bnan Heady commented that he had been to Ground Zero in New York City a
number of times and the federal government had not done a very good job of protecting its
citizens. He felt that the local government is also not doing a good job of protecting the
rights of citizens. He mentioned that Commissioner Adams had previously asked that he
meet with Commissioner Ginn privately and that meeting had never occurred. He felt the
Board did not want to hear any opposing views.
Commissioner Ginn commented that Mr. Heady had never called for an appointment
to speak with her privately.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
JUNE 11, 2002
-29-
•
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS - PROCTOR BARBER
CONCERNING THE BEACH SAND PROJECT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 3, 2002:
06/03/2002 16:02
From: Proctor
1036 18th St.
Vero Beach
5617780699
Barber
S.W.
Fax# 778-0899
PROCTOR BARBER
Untitled
To: Jim Chandler, Indian River County
Fax# 978-1822
I would lake to speak to the county commissioners on June llth
concerning the beach sand project.
My way has to do with aluminum groins that are relatively cheap
(compared to dredging) and easy to install.
They will last for years, accumulating material as time goes by.
I would appreciate your including me on the agenda for a brief time.
Thank You
".u3.____
Proctor Barber, 1036 18`h Street SW, stated that he had no problem with the sand
replacement project but objected to the high cost. He advised the Board that there are only
4 companies in the United States which do this type of work and their technology is about
50 years old. He felt that companies from the Netherlands, Spain or other European
countries have much more current technology, although they are not allowed to work here
JUNE 11, 2002
-30-
nir
EA
• •
in the United States. He believed that dredging would be cheaper than replacing sand but
preferred to see the County install aluminum piling groins which could be done for
considerably less than 10 million dollars. Aluminum is safe and lasts forever.
Chairman Stanbridge expressed her appreciation to Mr Barber for bringing this to
the attention of the Board.
Commissioner Adams commented that the actual physical cost of the project is
usually a minor outlay. The expensive part is the engineering and mitigation required by the
State. She suggested that the appropriate venue for this discussion would be the Beach
Committee.
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
11.C.1. NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY - CHILBERG
CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC. - EDLUND DRITENBAS
ARCHITECTS - PARTIAL RELEASE OF RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 5, 2002:
Date:
To:
Thru:
From
Subject:
June 5, 2002
The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director
Partial Release of Retainage - Chilberg Construction Co., Inc.,
North County Library
BACKGROUND:
Chilberg Construction Co. Inc., is the contractor for the improvements at the North County
Library. Substantial Completion was reached on May 8, 2002. Currently the contractor is
finishing the punch list of items needing corrections. The architect has established a value of
those corrections at $29,592. The retainage that has accrued totals $130,016.44.
JUNE 11, 2002
-31-
•
Chilberg has requested a partial release of the retainage of $100,424.19. That would leave the
$29 592 remaining to cover the punch list items. Chilberg would like to receive the partial
release to finalize all the payments outstanding to various sub -contractors and suppliers. Since
the Contract provides for the ability to reduce the retainage after receiving the certification of
substantial completion it appears reasonable to reduce the retainage down to the amount
identified by the Architect as necessary to cover the work of correcting items in the punch list
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the issuance of the Certificate of Substantial Completion, the identification of the value
of the list of corrections ($29,592) and certification of the request for payment by the Architect
(Edlund-Dritenbas) staff recommends a partial release of the ten percent retainage ($130,016.44)
in the amount of $100,424.19 leaving a remaining retainage of $29,592.25 The final payment
would be contingent upon certification of completion of all identified corrections (punch list) and
submittal of all required documents and lien releases.
JUNE 11, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved a partial release of the 10%
retainage ($130,016.44) in the amount of
$100,424.19 to Chilberg Construction, leaving a
remaining retainage of $29,592.25, as recommended
by staff.
•
11.C.2. BID #4054 - SEBASTIAN WATER ASSESSMENT - 8"
WATER MAIN - MAXWELL CONTRACTING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30, 2002:
DATE:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
May 30, 2002
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services, Director u
Erik Olson, Utilities Department, Director
Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager
Approval of Bid Award and Sample Agreement
MC Bid # 4054 Sebastian Water Assessment — 8" Water Main
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND -
The Board of County Commissioners approved a project to construct an 8" water main for the
west side of US Highway 1 from County Road 512 (Sebastian Blvd) to Wal-Mart. The bid
results are as follows:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specification s requested by:
Replies;
BID TABULATION:
May 8, 2002 at 2:00 pm
April 17 and 24, 2002
Four Hundred Twenty (420) vendors
Nine (9) vendors
Four (4) vendors
1.
Vendor
Amount
Maxwell Contracting Inc
Cocoa, FL
$577,000.00
2.
Utilx Corporation
Yalaha, FL
$655,215.00
3.
TB Landmark Const Inc
Jacksonville, FL
$672,745.70
4.
Treasure Coast Contracting Inc
Vero Beach, FL
$945,709.60
JUNE 11, 2002
-33-
•
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $650,000.00
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID- $577,000.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 473-000-169-397.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Maxwell Contracting Inc as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
In addition, staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approval of the attached sample
agreement and authorization for the Chairman to execute said agreement when required
performance and payment bonds have been submitted along with appropriate certification of
insurance and the County Attorney has approved the agreement as to form and legal sufficiency.
JUNE 11, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously awarded Bid #4054 to Maxwell
Contracting in the amount of $577,000, as
recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
-34-
•
11.C.3. BID #4053 - MAIN STREET PROFESSIONAL BUILDING
12" WATER MAIN - MAXWELL CONTRACTING
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30, 2002:
DATE:
TO:
THROUGH:
May 30, 2002
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services, Director
Erik Olson, Utilities Department, Director
FROM: Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of Bid Award and Sample Agreement
REFERENCE: IRC Bid # 4053 Main Street Professional Building — 12" Water Main
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND
The Board of County Commissioners approved a project to construct a 12" water main from
Louisiana Avenue to Indian River Drive in the City of Sebastian. The bid results are as follows:
Bid Opening Date: May 8, 2002 at 2:00 pm
Advertising Dates: April 17 and 24, 2002
DemandStar Broadcast to: Four Hundred Twenty (420) vendors
Specification s requested by: Eight (8) vendors
Replies: Six (6) vendors
BID TABULATION:
JUNE 11, 2002
-35-
•
Vendor
Amount
1.
Maxwell Contracting Inc
Cocoa, FL
$163,000.00
2.
Underground Utilities
Vero Beach, FL
$180,136.00
3.
Utilx Corporation
Yahala, FL
$191,191.00
4.
Derrico Construction Company
Melbourne, FL
$220,854.70
5.
Jobear/Warden Construction
Palm Bay, FL
$232,149.50
6.
Treasure Coast Contracting
Vero Beach, FL
$243412.40
JUNE 11, 2002
-35-
•
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $175,000.00
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID• $163,000.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS • 472-000-169-549.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Maxwell Contracting Inc as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid
In addition, staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approval of the attached sample
agreement and authorization for the Chairman to execute said agreement when required
performance and payment bonds have been submitted along with appropriate certification of
insurance and the County Attorney has approved the agreement as to form and legal sufficiency.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
awarded Bid #4053 to Maxwell Contracting in the
amount of $163,000, as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
JUNE 11, 2002
Indian River Co
Ap.roved
Date •
Admin
G
C D Z
Legal
I
-
,
1
Budget
Budget
1`% r
Department
�Y,
S/'ii
D L
Risk Manager
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously
awarded Bid #4053 to Maxwell Contracting in the
amount of $163,000, as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
JUNE 11, 2002
11.C.4. COUNTY JAIL RE -ROOFING - EDLUND DRITENBAS
CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 5, 2002:
Date: June 5, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From: Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director -x%2,14 cJJ •(j e� < <�
Subject: Contract for Architectural Services with Edlund & Dritenbas, Architects
Re -Roofing of County Jail
BACKGROUND:
Edlund & Dritenbas, Architects were approved to provide architectural services for the design
and re -roofing of Pods A & B at the Indian River County Jail The architect's estimate of the
construction cost of that project is $134,000. The amount set aside within the optional sales tax
finding was $112,000. The price estimate increase is based largely on the significant number of
structures currently located on the roof that have to be incorporated into the re -roofing.
Edlund & Dritenbas is proposing to perform the services for $11,790. That represents 8.8% of
the construction costs. That amount is derived by utilizing the State of Florida Department of
Management Services Fee Schedule for Architectural and Engineering Services
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the contract amount of $11,790, authorizing the Chairman to execute the contract.
subject to final review and approval of the contract documents by the County Attorney or his
designee. Authorize the additional need funding to be appropnated from remaining unexpended
optional sales tax funds that had been budgeted for detention electronics.
JUNE 11, 2002
djl
-37-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved the contract amount of
$11,790; authorized the Chairman to execute the
contract subject to final review and approval of the
contract documents by the County Attorney or his
designee; and authorized the additional need
funding to be appropriated from remaining
unexpended optional sales tax funds that had been
budgeted for detention electronics; all as
recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.F. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY MEETING -
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 769 (PARAMEDICS AND LABOR &
TRADES) AND IAFF LOCAL 2201 (FIREFIGHTERS)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 4, 2002:
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
James CarniceI1 - C
Human ResourceDirector
Executive Session
June 4, 2002
I am recommending you consider requesting a collective bargaining strategy meeting with the Board
of County Commissioners. I would be prepared to summarize the status of each of our three
bargaining units by June 11, 2002.
JUNE 11, 2002,
•
CONSENSUS was reached to meet at the end of this meeting in Conference Room
B
11.H.1. WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION - PETITION WATER
SERVICE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 3, 2002:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
PREPARED
AND STAINED
BY:
SUBJECT:
JUNE 3, 2002
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
W. ERIK OLSON
DIRECTOR OF UTSERVICES
JAMES D. CHAS
MANAGER OF
DEPARTMENT ILITY SERVICES
2//
MENT PROJECTS
WEST SIDE SUBDIVISION PETITION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UCP -2177
B A CKGR OT TNT)
A petition has been received from the owners of West Side Subdivision (40th Avenue SW, 5th Place
SW and 6th Lane SW), requesting that the County supply potable water and fire protection to West
Side Subdivision Staff is now seeking approval to begin design of the above-mentioned project.
(See ATTACHMEN'T'S -1 Plat Map, and 2- Petition).
ANALYSTS
There are 16 homes on 16 residential lots in West Side and 1 commercial parcel containing "The
West Side Racquet Club', which may benefit from this proposed water mam installation. The 12
owner'§ signing the petition requesting the installation of the county water system, represent 70.6 %
of the 17 parcels which may benefit from this project.
The properties are typically 1.00 acre plus or minus, the 2 smallest each being 0.52 of an acre. The
Club site is on 6.89 acres, and although this parcel has no frontage abutting the proposed water
lines, service will be provided. At a special owners association meeting on Sunday April 7, 2002
staff discussed with the owners using an average of all parcels for an amount to assess the club
parcel This method produces 1.38 of an acre and would be the largest assessment in the project.
The owners agreed that such a method seemed reasonable. (See attached EXHIBIT 1 —Plat Map
that displays the area to benefit from the assessment project, and EXHIBIT 3 — Schedule of
properties).
•
JUNE 11, 2002
LII
or
-39-
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water line
route Funding will be from the assessment fund No. 473. Design, services will be provided by the
Department of Utility Services.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the above -listed project,
and requests authorization for the Department to proceed with the engineering design work and
award a contract for survey services based on the most favorable quote, in preparation for the
special assessment project.
T,TST OF F,XATRTTS•
1 -Plat Map
2 -Petition
3 -Schedule of Properties &
Estimated Project Cost
:
(� i��mN� e 9_. •
cn
L
sw (A AVENUE)
ATTACHMENT 1
JUNE 11, 2002
•
Commissioner Ginn questioned whether the owner of the Racquet Club lives in the
subdivision and will be a part of the assessment.
Assessment Project Manager Dan Chastain stated that the owner of the Racquet Club
had signed the petition in support of the service but the service will be for the benefit of the
homeowners in the subdivision, although service will be provided to the Club. The parcel
where the Club is located does not fall under usage assessment rules. However, the property
owners have agreed to the method of assessment for the Club.
Commissioner Ginn then questioned what would happen should the owner of the
Club subdivide that property in the future, and Mr. Chastain responded that scenario had not
been discussed.
Mr. Chastain continued that the Club property has little frontage and it would
probably not be feasible to subdivide the property. However, if the property were
subdivided, the developer would be responsible for the infrastructure, including utilities. The
service line being provided to the Club is very small and would not accommodate further
development.
JUNE 11, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved the above project and
authorized staff to proceed with the engineering
design work and award a contract for survey
services based on the most favorable quote in
preparation for the special assessment project, as
recommended by staff
-41-
1
•
11.H.2. FLORIDA RIDGE SUBDIVISION - PETITION WATER
SERVICE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 3, 2002:
DATE: JUNE 3, 2002
TO:
FROM:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINIS 1'RATOR
W. ERIK OLSON W
DIRECTOR OF UTILI ERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF
BY. DEPARTME
a
SE
1
NT PROJECTS
ILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: FLORIDA RIDGE SUBDIVISION WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO UCP -2164
R A CKGROTTND
Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan states, " The County's water system shall be expanded
to supply the potable water needs of the eastern half of the county, during the period from 1986 thru
2010 ' In 1987, the Indian River County Water System Master Plan was developed. The purpose
of the Master Plan was to establish a program for the economical and orderly expansion of the
County's water system. (See ATTACHMENT -1 pages 2 and 24-26 , of the Comprehensive Plan
Potable Water Sub -Element). Honda Ridge is identified as a subdivision having " Undersized Lots
& Using Private Wells". Many such subdivisions, by the initiative of the Board of County
Commissioners have been provided County Water. The most recent of these being Dixie Heights
which final assessment was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on July 10 2001.
(See ATTACHMENT -2 An interoffice memorandum from M. J. Galanis, E.H.D. Environmental
Health Director; which lists Florida Ridge as Priority #1 of listed subdivisions needing public water
services) (See ATTACHMENT -3 A letter dated October 14, 1998, from an owner resident, having
lived in Florida Ridge since 1968. Included with the letter is a water quality analysis, which was
performed by the City of Vero Beach Environmental Control Laboratory), (See ATTACHMENT —4
Plat Map and Schedule of properties). Over the years a number of residents, in Florida Ridge have
requested county water service but have been unable to obtain a desired number of signatures and
have not submitted a petition.
ANALYSTS
There are 255 platted lots in Florida Ridge, with 162 homes, which may benefit from this proposed
water main installation. 57 or 35 % of the homes appear to be non owner occupied, (they have not
filed for homestead exemption). The above referenced schedule, indicates that 7 owner's of 11 lots
JUNE 11, 2002
-42-
have made verbal or written requests for the installation of the county water system. Staff has
received a few other inquiries over the past 12 years (undocumented).
The properties are typically 0.14 acre plus or minus, (60 Feet x 100 Feet).
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed water
line route. In the intenm, funding will be from the assessment fund No. 473. Design services
will be provided by the Department of Utility Services.
RFCOMMFNDATTC)N
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the above -listed project, as
a project which is consistent with the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan and the
Environmental Health Department's recommended areas to be served, and requests authorization
for the Department to proceed with the engineering design work and award a contract for survey
services based on the most favorable quote, in preparation for the special assessment project.
T,TST OF ATTACHMENTS•
1 -Pages 2, 24-26 Comp. Plan Water Sub -Element
2 -Memo Environmental Health Dept.
3 -Letter from owner
4 -Plat Map & Schedule of Properties
FLORIDA RIDGE S/D
ASSESSMENT PROJECT
t..
- VERO SPORES
JUNE 11, 2002 B1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved the above project and
authorized staff to proceed with the engineering
design work and award a contract for survey
services based on the most favorable quote in
preparation for the special assessment project, as
recommended by staff.
11.I. INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC. - 2002
CONTINUUM OF CARE SUPER NOFA (Notice of Funding
Availability) HUD GRANT (1. MARTIN COUNTY HEALTH
AND HUMAN SERVICES TENANT BASED RENTAL
ASSISTANCE {For Information Only}; 2. ALCOHOPE TENANT
BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE; AND 3. THE PARTNERSHIP
PROJECT)
The Board reviewed a letter of June 4, 2002:
INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC
2525 St. Lucie Avenue
Vero Beach, FL 32960 irhsclh(c�aol.con
772-567-7790
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
County Administration Bldg.
1840 251 Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Commissioners: June 4, 2002
The Indian River Homeless Services Council, Inc. is submitting three new projects to
HUD under the 2002 Continuum of Care SuperNOFA application process. Attached to
this letter is a summary of each of the projects.
JUNE 11, 2002
km
-44-
•
•
(1)The first project is Martin County Health and Human Services Tenant Based
Rental Assistance. IT IS INCLUDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION ONLY. THE
MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILL BE fll!,
APPLICANT.
The Martin County Board of Commissioners has already signed off on this project. This
project requires no action on the part of Indian River County Board of Commissioners.
(2) The second project is Alcohope Inc. Tenant Based Rental Assistance. The Council
is asking that the Indian River County Board of Commissioners serve as the applicant.
This project requires no cash match. It does require a $218,100.00 "in-kind" services
match will which will be provided by Alcohope. It will have management oversight from
the Indian River County Department of Human Services
(3) The third project is The Partnership Project. The Council is asking that the Indian
River County Board of Commissioners serve as the applicant.
This project requires a $68,008.00 cash match which is being provided by the Indian
River Homeless Services Council. It will have management oversight from the Indian
River County Department of Human Services.
We respectfully request that the Board of Commissioners vote to act as applicant for
project two and project three and that Commissioner Stanbridge affix her signature on
behalf of the Board of Commissioners on the applications.
We are requesting that this be placed as an item on the County Commission Agenda for
June 11, 2002.
The entire application is available for review in the Commissioner's Office as of
Wednesday, June 5a'.'
I would be happy to answer any questions about this application.
Sincerely,
Executive Director
JUNE 11, 2002
BR
INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC
Final HUD 2002 Project Proposals
June 3 2002
Project Priority One
Martin County Health and Human Services
Tenant Based Rental Assistance
Applicant: Martin County Board of Commissioners
$380,700.00
No dollar match
This project will secure permanent affordable housing through tenant based rental
assistance for a period of up to five years for a target population of chronically homeless
individuals and families who repeatedly seek services from Martin County homeless
service providers and primarily through the Martin County Health and Human Services
Department. These clients are homeless due to their physical disabilities mental
disabilities, or addictive disorders. Clients are high volume repeat users of County
Health and Human Service resources and are often found on the streets, facing continual
evictions from sub standard housing, living in homeless encampments or abandoned real
estateand/or living in cars. This population also includes mentally ill homeless women
with children, who face losing their children or who have lost their children already and
continue to remain "on the street" due to their inability to access housing or to sustain it.
Martin County Health and Human Services will assure that the inldnd service match
is met by provider agencies who are currently seeing these client and by providing
one on one counseling, case management, emergency medical and financial
assistance where appropriate and by coordination of extensive referral and follow up
with other supportive services providers in the community. Recipients of the rental
assistance will be housed in Martin County over the five year period of the rental
assistance in order to facilitate access to services. Number of assisted units=11.
Project Priority Two
Alcohope Inc. Tenant Based Rental Assistance $218,100.00
Applicant: Indian River County Board of Commissioners No dollar match
This project will secure permanent affordable housing through tenant based rental
assistance for a period of up to five years for the target population of substance abusing
homeless individuals who art seeking treatment or who have completed treatment, at or
through Alcohope Inc. who will require clean safe affordable housing to sustain the
gains made in the treatment system and who can benefit from a secure housing situation
The chronic substance abusing and or mentally ill client requires sustained, ongoing
treatment and support services to maintain societal functioning and to support ongoing
recovery from substance addition. Often the chronic homeless substance abusing
population is disenfranchised from family members. This population may also exhibit
co-occurring developmental disability, mental health problems or other disabling
conditions that contribute to chrome homelessness The Indian River Homeless Services
Council will assist Alcohope in administering the tenant based rental assistance.
Alcohope will identify the tenants and provide or arrange for supportive services to the
population to meet the match requirements. Recipients of the rental assistance will be
JUNE 11, 2002
-46-
0 1,
4.;
•
required to remain housed in Indian River over the five year period of the rental
assistance in order to facilitate access to Alcohope's follow-up services. Number of
assisted units=7
Project Priority Three
The Partnership Project
Applicant: Indian River County Board of Commissioners
$272,034.00
$ 68,008.00 match
The proposed project will utilize supportive housing funds to create a two person
professional team, to perform outreach and deliver supportive services to homeless
individuals and families over the next three years. The team will assure (1)
development of a detailed service plan identifying the best mix of provider agencies
in the Continuum of Care to meet the housing and supportive services needs of
clients; (2) facilitation of access into shelter, transitional housing, affordable rentals
and affordable permanent housing (3) facilitation the process of enrolling homeless
persons and families for all eligible state and local entitlements and services; (4)
linking homeless people with health, mental health, and substance abuse services; (5)
assisting homeless persons in securing access to job placement, educational and
certificate training; (6) ensuring maximum utilization of mainstream resources by
clients. The partnership will include (1) one qualified mental health specialist with
expertise in developing service plans for persons with mental illness and/or
substance abuse and (1). one generalist case manager who is proficient in engaging
the hard to reach homeless people and in providing services to homeless and indigent
people in need of a wide range of active advocacy and facilitation on their behalf.
Office space will be provided, free of charge, to any Continuum of Care member
agency requesting an on site presence to provide services to the partnership clients.
Our final request to HUD will be for $870,834.00
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, the Board
unanimously approved the County serving as
applicant for Project #2, Alcohope Inc. Tenant
Based Rental Assistance and Project #3, The
Partnership Project and authorized the Chairman to
execute the applications; all as recommended by
staff.
COPIES OF APPLICATIONS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
•
JUNE 11, 2002
QV 1 -
L l% i
. n
-47-
13.A. CHAIRMAN RUTH M. STANBRIDGE - UPDATES
Chairman Stanbridge announced that she had no updates for this meeting but that she
would be in Washington on June 12 and 13.
Commissioner Adams questioned whether Chairman Stanbridge would be bringing
back the National Scenic Highway designation, and Chairman Stanbridge stated that there
has been no official word as yet on that designation.
13.C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS - AGENDA
PROTOCOL
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 10, 2002:
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
Date: June 10, 2002
Subject: AGENDA PROTOCOL
From. Fran B. Adams
Commissioner
Several years ago the Board had a policy that all public discussion items must go
through an effort by staff or an appropriate committee to resolve the issue brought
forward If the issue could not be resolved or handled by staff or committee then the
issue would be brought to us for discussion and direction. This policy worked well in the
past.
We moved away from this policy in an effort to allow more public participation
and comment. What has happened now is that, in addition to having valid public
discussion items, particular political candidates take advantage of expounding their
views before free TV and other persons bring verbal diatribes addressed to global
innuendos on issues not dealt with by the Commission.
While we all believe in the right of free speech, our County Commission meetings
are business meetings meant to dispose of County business in a timely manner. There
are many constituents who call with problems that we individually investigate, route to
the appropriate department or person, and try to resolve to some conclusion. Not all
problems are resolvable. If each constituent brought their problems to the public
meetings we would all five spend hours listening when we could each be spending that
time solving problems
JUNE 11, 2002
r
-48-
Commissioner Adams expressed her view that the Board's business meetings should
be limited to that business.
Chairman Stanbridge agreed that disruptions are not good for business.
Commissioner Ginn commented that public discussion should be held at the
beginning of the meeting so speakers would not have to sit through the business part of the
meeting in order to make their comments.
CONSENSUS was reached for each Commissioner to give any comments or
suggestions regarding these matters to the County Attorney who will come back with a
recommendation for the Board.
13.D. COMMISSIONER CAROLINE D. GINN
PROCLAMATIONS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 4, 2002:
To: County Commissioners
From: Commissioner Caroline Ginn
Re: Proclamations
Date: June 4, 2002
Because of the publicity surrounding a recent proclamation at our May 21,
2002 meeting, and the two votes not in support of the proclamation, I
recommend that Indian River County consider adopting some simple
proclamation guidelines.
Based on a recent e-mail survey by Flagler County, and additional e-mails and
phone calls generated by myself, the following information has been
gathered:
JUNE 11, 2002
Charlotte County: "Charlotte County does not have any policy regarding
proclamations. If the request is too political or offensive, the person
requesting the proclamation is asked to revise it or drop it."
(per ReneeLee [Renee.Lee@charlottefl.com]
Palm Beach County: "In Palm Beach County, the request for a proclamation
is most often made directly to a County Commissioner The Commissioner's
office completes a form and sends it to our Public Information Office. This
office is responsible for insuring that the Proclamation is in the proper
format and added to the agenda."
(per Barbara Deighan [Bdeighan@co.palm-beach.fl.us]
Marion County: "Marion County has no Board policy concerning Proclamations
other than the requirement that the request has to be from a Board
member or the County Administrator."
(perGordonJohnston,MarionCountyAtty. [marioncoatty@yahoo.com]
Lee County: "Lee County hes no formal proclamation policy. Our process
works pretty much like Palm Beach County with sponsorship by a Board
Member or County Manager."
(per James Yaeger, Lee County Attorney)
(Diana Delgiacco, Office Manager, Lee County Attorney's Office)
[delgiad@ leegov.com]
St. Lucie County: St. Lucie County has no written policy. The party
requesting the proclamation is asked to submit their request in writing along
with information useful in drafting the proclamation. The requesting party
is asked if they will be available for a morning or evening meeting, and also
asked to provide the name of the person who will receive the proclamation.
The information is then forwarded to the County Administrator who decides
if it should go on the Agenda. If the request seems controversial, the
County Administrator consults with the Chairman and may consult
individually with each Commissioner.
(per Diane Turner, Asst. to County Administrator Doug Anderson)
[via telephone@ 772-462-1156]
Martin County: Martin County sent the following e-mail:
"A Proclamation, signed by all members of the Board and sealed by the
Clerk of the Court, is a document of "goodwill" used to recognize a group,
organization or an event. A request for a Proclamation may come from a
member of the Board, County Administrator or the public. Proclamations
shall not be used to recognize individuals.
JUNE 11, 2002
-50-
A Proclamation shall be submitted in the same method as any Board
Agenda Item and shall be placed in the Consent Section of the Agenda at
least two weeks prior to the scheduled presentation of said Proclamation.
This provides for review, discussion, modification, approval or rejection of
the document prior to its presentation. In a time sensitive situation, the
rules may be suspended and the Proclamation presented during the Board
meeting to accommodate the request. This may be performed at the
discretion of the Board.
The signed and sealed Proclamation shall be presented at the
beginning of the next Regular Meeting of the Board or at a future date,
whichever is preferred by the recipient. At such presentation, an official
reading of said Proclamation into the record shall be performed and the
presentation of the Proclamation shall take place. The Chair or a designee
shall present the Proclamation to the requestor or recipient."
(per Denise Eshleman, Ex. Asst. to the County Atty.)
[desh lema@marti n.f I.us)
Orange County: "Orange County does not have a written policy. The Orange
County Charter states the Chairman may issue proclamations. They are not
presented for prior approval by the board "
(per Charlene Ward for Tom Wilkes, Orange County Attorney
[Charlene Ward@ocfl.net)
Indian River County has no written guidelines. I recommend that the
Commission instruct our Executive Aide, Chairman and County Administrator
to collaborate in forming some simple guidelines
JUNE 11, 2002
Commissioner Macht noted that there is hardly anything in the human condition that
is not controversial and it is not the Board's job to deal with those matters. Organizations
love to have proclamations. He believed it should be left to the discretion of the Chairman
as to whether or not a proclamation should be issued.
MOTION WAS made by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn to approve
Commissioner's Ginn recommendation and set up a
committee to come up with the recommended
guidelines for issuance of proclamations.
County Attorney Paul Bangel suggested that the Board appoint one person to
investigate the matter rather than establishing a committee.
Commissioner Adams recalled a proclamation which was turned down by the Board
some years ago because it was not generic to this area. She noted that the proclamation
which occasioned this discussion was requested by herself and emphasized that
proclamations are just a recognition of a person or event, such as the Frog Leg Festival. She
did not believe there to be a problem with the current method of issuing proclamations.
Chairman Stanbridge agreed that there should be some simple guidelines in place.
MOTION WAS withdrawn by Commissioner
Tippin.
JUNE 11, 2002
-52-
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board
unanimously appointed the Executive Aide to the
Board, Kimberly Massung, to investigate the policy
and bring recommendations back to the Board
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 9:46 a.m.
ATTEST:
C1-92-fripe c—er--se2c
arton, Clerk Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chai an
Minutes Approve
JUNE 11, 2002