HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/5/2001 yF`ir .u .^ � ,w*?t'.�i �f: , Ft. . }U,t r�;Fdsku r s4�x�* i=;sQ 3'6.1 dF v ,vfi. '-� t r '" .f., i ;` r .: 9 � yxr _>•
a t t ,
�' "^ +r✓ ^ksa ,cf "� ». .r . +. . . " g�
A'r `K. ..,✓ .a , +S „ v <mA . x x.°y .^ '..', , . : .w,r; -N >< n: sh " + y ;xa' $n �P",ak
MINUTES ATTACH •
ED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, JUNE 512001 - 9 : 00 A. M .
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
184025 th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Caroline D . Ginn, Chairman District 5
Ruth M . Stanbridge, Vice Chairman District 2 James E . Chandler, County Administrator
Fran B . Adams District 1 Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney
Kenneth R . Macht District 3 Kimberly Massung , Executive Aide to BCC
John W . Tippin District 4 Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9 : 00 a. m . L CALL TO ORDER
BACKUP
2 . INVOCATION Stan Boling PAGES
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm . John W. Tippin
4 . ADDITIONS/DELETIONS to the AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
1 • Add Item 5 . , Proclamation Honoring Representative Bob Allen .
2 . Add Item 10 . , Proposed Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting Regarding Contract Negotiations
with the International Association of FireFighters .
3 , Add Item 13 . D . , Commissioner Kenneth Macht, Personal Comments .
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A, Regular meeting of April 17 , 2001
B . Regular meeting of May 1 , 2001
C , Regular meeting of May 8 , 2001
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A, Received & Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board :
Fellsmere Water Control District: (a) District Map and
(b) Annual Budget for FY 2001 - 02
Gni I u J b U
r 1
L F
1ti F4^a" x.- .. ',°:^F r , , ; ' ; ,a r X: . s:^: "+' .2' .,= •' ':> '#. ..:: x Y x, xr:_ a, d :Y
,:,.
Gfl' ' �. . . ^ • . . .. . 4 �. P x.. .ry F'' irt;`' „r .. ... . .. a .x f. `h . , b � �.Wr'��:
n ,{� IM
�::
,..
t .*'`+t.
,. .. .n '
:.
.v_
�fi . .x, .,x. . .c: -x a7u, 'S3m. . ukw A . .. . ». .. . ,.✓ . . .. ...r s . �:., ,+ ,C..
x d .
; w.. . r t , , .. :. �frY.,,,� W. .� �. ... r, , - .:,, ,, . .. , ., . ., , 3 ,'s;' . .: . ..>.
. .. �. , z N,r . . ,.;,. .,. ,... . � s, ,. .,. , •.< ,'a - ,:. ...
..£s•. :: x ,,.*. w, . .. , aa . . : k , , ,: a .� , .. a.. . .. � ,.: .-. ,- .�+�`� , s : ,.- ,. ._`:., �,.
s�i . .. xs ., n ,. ,,. 'f :- ." . , t ,:,. ,. x��e s � r 2,.
"M
,.
F .x. m.: E«"jx'4f
wf P r`f/ 3 'h Jx "3.
z
7. _CONSENT AGENDA (cont ' d ) • BACKUP
PAGES
B . Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated May 17 , 2001 ) 1 - 8
C . Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated May 24, 2001 ) 9-20
D . State Revenue Sharing Application
(memorandum dated May 17 , 2001 ) 21 -25
E . Modification of Projects for the Local Mitigation Strategy
Plan
(memorandum dated May 25 , 200 1 ) 26- 30
F . Surplus Vehicle Reinstatement as a Fixed Asset
(Buildings and Grounds)
(memorandum dated May 23 , 2001 ) 31 - 33
G . Rental of Storage Space for Library Expansion
(memorandum dated May 23 , 200 1 ) 34-35
H . Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 Anti-Drug Abuse Grant Funding
(memorandum dated May 29 , 2001 ) 36- 37
I . Miscellaneous Budget Amending 019
(memorandum dated May 30 , 2001 ) 38 - 39
J . Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot
2 , Block 21 , Vero Lake Estates , Unit 4
(memorandum dated May 17, 200 1 ) 40-43
K. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated May 29 , 200 1 ) 44-45
L . GEN Development Inc . Request for Final Plat Approval
for The Preserve at Vero Beach ( f/k/a Southlakes ) Phase 1
(memorandum dated May 29 , 200 1 ) 46 - 58
1 64
J .,,.
we ...l.a. v'�,'s. � . , � . . • « ' , - ;., . . ' .. o-., � n, ,.r.. . x . .<.. . , '^: "3r". '`�z :e..
# ... r , . .... . r .. .. .x,.. ....:5 ., a x,., :.,. z k ,r aax. a� ::'M, rt °a z { x J.
s :.'3!:,r. , r r '#r ,; . , .. .. .. -� ,. . - r . ,. .. . ,,.� c '"z.,,:3 ,_.. , s . < ., a s
:'•? „ u .. . x � "i: ak 'nF :, � �'t ^'Pa,
L. . .. , 4 . . . .�� . . .- , r3"'rir� . .y �, x , _{ . d .,. .. .a, fi�<a.:, i , r .+ . . : :' .:. :.i 'x, . : :.:. ",^,.
k , . v xu+r ^r; : # � .. r*c„{».i�2" i L :`$w•; '�'e�,Ft, . ;',Y a b1 .circ .,c
'� e*:::F.: 3, {j »^raK'Sar .w m K � » iv t�' t w s: b n '� '. s ,� 4 k v 'S *. f >%,. {
3 ,. f” ,P,.t ✓ » � -.{ 0f' v xn ;x. a
,k' �}. . a!F=•u. . :_. . {� y .^4 _,. ,x,., et Fia; 4' i..fY G r x: yam �:� k l " o ,. .. . . d
':�., b h X` r. ., : 4a' ., /C" .. � „ i', �¢t.� � , y i< �.'. S z�5 : ,5 ..�
i. . re -- , "a. . .. d . . « ,. -a• r , - �.. � .... e. ... r `R°rl 8? r 'F, � ' a .: r� ; -...
s , �, i ".Y n .� x3 .,'� . .'Sa x✓ � :. paw
�
K .
'�z1',� 'Aa ,, , 'gym �' ,.�,k ,r,�a rS � . ., . . A . :", k , 2. ;_`e-. ».,� ,• ,: . .Y^zzn €.a -�. >~,.,v
_
WOR
+ - �
ib•"a.v
y
�r
x 8 . CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and BACKUP
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES PAGLI%�:
None
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1 • Application for Transfer of Franchise— Charter to AT&T
(memorandum dated May 15 , 200 1 )
(continued from BCC Meeting of May 22 , 2001 ) 59 - 77
2 . County-initiated request to amend the text of the Re -
creation and Open Space Element of the Comprehen-
sive Plan to revise the "Cultural " objective and policies .
(Legislative)
(memorandum dated May 11 , 2001 )
(continued from BCC Meeting of May 22 , 200 1 ) 78 - 90
3 . County Initiated Request to Amend the Text of the
Future Land Use Element of the County ' s Compre-
hensive Plan (Legislative)
(memorandum dated May 24 , 200 1 ) 91 - 127
4 . County Initiated Request to Amend the Comprehen-
sive Plan to Redesignate 164 . 1 Acres from AG- 1 to T ;
and to Expand the Urban Service Area to Include Those
± 164 . 1 Acres
(memorandum dated May 29 , 2001 ) 128 - 162
Be PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
1 . Public Hearing Scheduled for June 12 , 2001 :
a. Vero Beach Development Association ' s request
to rezone t 10 . 6 acres located approximately one
quarter mile east of US 1 and f 180 feet north of
97`h Lane from RS - 1 to RM- 6 (Quasi-Judicial)
4
b . St . John ' s River Water Management District ' s
request for a right- of-way abandonment for a
number of rights -of-way within a portion of the
Fellsmere Farm Company Subdivision , located
south of the Town of Fellsmere and east of
Willow Street (Legislative)
4
�I R 1 Sag 9, <.4; f
3 i r n' g-£.€ zs: 1: a4� #t'?T
ns £ ,s�s , ,. a' n ' *x .' .• ��. .'� ,y- ;�„� .
�.
s >, t. �r� - ;, r 4 F' i x>.k '.'. f`v' s'<r ,� x , i w wvr >a.,,rA•.i
�� .. .�w� tr-:
.+��,t .. 1 „`` K, � .'i» �Si y " , ,..�°s, 'c' $:.o- � .r. ys shym :;mx,.. „x �' ;� w... ., `1
�' ��.&4 3 �Y l, :".'y Fa >.y�,r ` 'F _..�,. e 's, .• _ .x E+ Y5 `- ':'�' `'ti.
d.�.�"x$:'* • .. w . ' : � ' "'�.. ' "�" §•.. x .wi'i ;L5 `AM `+�xSSY `+�' ns' �h. `}.,'ST.,s`,�» `d >::, .
„� i�S x*�, 'H. ;.:� ._. '" > ,,55 "� n.._ � ` .> � �; �i? "'
. . � „, ,rKr, .;, r,,. po:_,. y. f. s �,,,. xs . '. w :^ .>. .. .: .*<" ,. s r " t .< y:.y
. . . ,+ -vy .:. '•3• " Y . , tz
, . „r i . . w. n . , ,. ,. ., . „ ,„. . F .. e. .. .. t .. .,. _ . „h. . .. ,. . ? .. . r,.
r.F �f r. - . , , •e ' .. . 'C$. . �+.. . .1 d, pa . .s„ e.ua„ n + -
�
.. . .f a ,. +�y , . - r• �:. .: .. ,": . . . .. . . �� �: 4 .: t^� 'sv3n, _ 'e.„*, 4 a
.. >. . . >. . . ,.. f .35., ., .. . .s�'� -,..._, i N �h . �e _ ��(j�,,
„. , r ?.d . are, i.. . . ,: e . . . . . e riv. . t .• ,.. s er., ,, .�. , . �;'$' _';^'.s � .JFIr r
x . . i'ti ,3r::. T . , .. s, �_ . a, . v S �a . :dx � .. .5., + _£
, xw,•. �. ,. ,.. , . ��. t ,;�fr '. , � .. ,. > .� r t � s,. ,. . KS . .J. i2 w.<* .0 €':u.,
#S ,_ � .. ,. ., 4'� C .... ��"'. y �"F rv .. .,. .w . w 'k,_. : z4, la
.y � y' ,• r ., i, ss:,Ku c "°.�� i-„ ,_.s��,� 's**'�” hs3„£x $�„�„-,, �S X ,k.�,n...�,:.5� ""v 5..,?+ € '-+,.a'
'3"w "5:.-rj;�� £` .� �x x u 2,. Ja � '` ra „'wx.°fa y '� C � 's W. '`�,4�,,, �''s9sr�y�i"'3� 'EdP � rr
f
i
9 . PUBLIC ITEMS (cont ' d ) BACKUP
Ce PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS (cont ' d ) • PAGES
1 . (cont ' d . ) :
C , Approval of purchase of the Walker parcels of
the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh environmental land
acquisition project, using environmental land
acquisition bond funds (Legislative)
K >.
2 > Public Hearing Scheduled for June 19 , 2001 :
a. Thomas S . Hammond ' s request to rezone
f 18 . 7 acres located approximately one
quarter mile east of 43 d Avenue, on the
south side of 41 S` St. from CG to IL
(Quasi-Judicial)
b . Land Development Regulation (LDR)
Amendments : new standards involving fire
vehicle movement through sites and building
access for such vehicles, and other fire pro -
tection items (Legislative)
(memorandum dated May 24, 200 1 ) 163 - 164
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S MATTERS
None
11 . DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Develoament
None
Be Emergency Services
None
Ce General Services
1 . Grand Opening for Shooting Range
(memorandum dated May 25 , 200 1 ) 165
2 . Bid Award : IRC #3058 — North County Library
Renovations
(memorandum dated May 17 , 200 1 ) 166 - 191
3 . Agreement with Dow Howell Gilmore Assoc . , Inc .
Architects for Design and Constructions Services
for an Addition to the Indian River County Sheriff' s
Department for Evidence Storage
(memorandum dated May 29 , 200 1 ) 192
d ` E 0 J
k
?rzs,„s"'i s e s r c 4 $'t a` r.^; NA >m T ✓ y3. �, t',r$ , v •v't . ,
.' t bx, ” +€'+, .,> .",., L -x+ F, xa :g" „S . a3. -
YK.' ,> �^ • ., ,.c. , . ..s.. .., - sa . .y .,., 's;J , -r ;cr-5 T'. w"e «t' .. ^:'
•. r is n
a .f 1. A :. #' . x. q .:. .M1 4 ,..e 3. ' e . `A-
,>.., ,. h"'},, sa 3 .r.,o '::o- - ; , ., x'” ,P' i , . . .. +"q . ..i* f»:.. .:
.�
z 's .*Y .. YGrr . ., ....xr z. } .ry iet .4 ' * a 5� 1 < x , .
S &
> 5 ” .. a . .. . r?�^.x •t , . @ . f m 4- ' ' " `''vK wr x*aY. '4t^
:, ...r ,ea
- ,A
Hr3 ,„ ✓ 3'<„ ' sw` '�, r.; s . . x °' , .e t '` 3 �r=•,'u t^s xr ".y�; ,: r.,s �.� &.fit
, : �sd o� ��' % ,.-=s ' r�$t .,,.� � .. r
'ktr
r x<rrt
K ,,. ..,, -: „s��"AY, . . z �4 ,,,.. � � ,x. . ,x . av K: >., s _.., s, T. ,. . vx a ,:?.+
ws, '� ��. �r ,......�. .�' �t..' `ay ., t`." ' +t . � '4` a;?. ,sx `ks��"�-. ., '• awa;�: ta• i .
.. .�v 5 _ .d, � �� . „ ., . ., , k _ : i. T Fr < w L” r ;C. ,., y+;. fi .. ,a ...:,r C X .,+'
sC� y' 4 y1�kr v'} w c i s�.� m� 1r��':.r s. Y '�, _ .:. v s.,v� �ba Te?: .', '�i8" `� *'�1*`- . �•;� "`�"?.
,? 'r: 5. r 1 „,. �n „ r ,? s. . „ $ ^.; r. k..^ ✓ x. eq.,.. .d: � 1*. x,>3'"a . ...... £v
'it" T . .. ., , , w. . ": , , 4. < a . . , . . '..; e ut J' , y. ,�j' ,?5 ,.. ^.
>."„ .#.��"s.nax»'.'i � .qd! . -. �� '.� ,3ir ,. . . _. H4'Srv�sffi' > s"nrx ,t.4s<s* v.. , a'. i.' ...w 91°? E „� ,w[:,c r. .<a`.3.
3_, w, .,. ,...:r __ w K > ._ '�`.;,,'?`3c 2... ,,. , ,t ,S�"s,'�..,+-.:a . v .,s.,..,.e-w , 4s,. u€, r 3axrvr � 3*shs',,'.4.a,c &m,..�' -'a�s,:„�i,i.�x^
r., . t , .x.. .�i,. . . , • .may
Y. .. a^ }- ... d ;5.1. C' 1 4V5 S+ M' . '.Yl m ':.A:; :`�s's t H S 4Y.'+ C fr _.:
� # �.� e• $'ssr d » .Y. .'T .'- ,;r .
a :._. . :.r :,& .�. . . . . ,. , ., r r .. ,. � - . . . . . .. ,,•,;:� � . ,.~; r ,! . .... ..
.� r. .a . ^� r., ..:» 4.. .. a,_ . .,. E -
. . ,sme ?a5 4 . .x. . fi ? . .,. .w,. , x:.:. r,. N . ...,: r x .. ,.«,. n esi ..:s r„ : . .. `� . ✓•' ._
. :. ,� - .:w '� v i
> >.. `"5=:, . nr , .:- . �. _. , , �"„ , . .�. .. .r . ..,n Y �w, .,:. ' > x . a s•;:?
_x , a '`_ y -;§w,,r s s }, aN'S� �r- <r
'" �F :.."M b . . �,. . _n _ .v 54.. < �.M'. .. , r v : Sl ,� rf ..Y $['.. ... ,�j y.+�' W rv. '" h'u.. .. } d
Fa \d �a � ... . . y� ",}a' .'v�Q X ifr -.. . . -.. .. .f� b� . y x ♦ x -.+� 'Y„ R. d. :.
r} ._,... . �.• ua, "� ,.>..: ., . _ . . . .. . ,`§�,.;. ,.. . .,�. : � 5 y s�. .. X, x a ',vrzrr n "u ,„
� x� .a : . ,.: r . , ads .. , w� ,. ,.. -.� ,.,t . 5
r' ., .u, . .:r.-* . . _ �. . . . -.�. S ., Y >. . . $ > .. r, % . � , r ,,... .� d r ,:.
� � - ss #., :. . �..>•- , �..:.r„ � r�r r ... , �, r (�, � r <r.., .:�
a,. .. . . rrrvr "�, , •':�1 . �n M" ,.e,. . . ., .. 'L - ,, : .. .S '§'y. .:,,:h �" . ,. . ...E.r ct ......:
t # .+ ... .rr. . '. , :. >^?1, e4 rt �. ....,. "`v` n s° +r':'> i
,Y '#'�,.,. ar, , 9 . - ; . -' e e. .:., w - rc,:' k s!grn sr' k + >:'; ,c*Y� t�e;Y , ...'� °rt c n ;a`a r " L .L
.:�� r�rz a� ✓_Y .s ._,�y '�"" 4..-, 'k '„r, 4>«'y+ '§:� -:p £ ': E '1S a x r,:=.�; a'.n ; w
,7�� , h _ x gip, � M � ` ,� sx c•A' Y: e § gam+ dy.b,� k� r L,r , �'
3k� €s'�'�'1` y. o ” � � �v � r
. - . _ . +' 1'� 7 - s- .,•F., . , .ae. ._s z. .r. . a,.=:^ „x �,- � "�^ln�'3
� m'�'Gu'#7 �
Ile DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont ' d 1 • BACKt ' P
D . Leisure Services PAGES
None
E . Office of Management and Budget
None
Fe Personnel
None
G . Public Works
1 . FDOT Supplemental Agreement for Roseland Road
Sidewalk - and Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife
Refuge
(memorandum dated May 25 , 2001 ) 193 - 198
2 . Sebastian Canoe Launch, Award of Bid No . 061
(memorandum dated May 30 , 200 1 ) 199 - 203
3 . Miscellaneous Concrete Sidewalks Project, Recom-
mendation of Bid No . 3062
(memorandum dated May 30 , 2001 ) 204 -206
4 , Right-of- Way Acquisition/ 58 `h Ave . Improvements ,
Phase II, Parcel No . 129 , W. D . Graves III and Frances
Ellis Graves
(memorandum dated May 24 , 200 1 ) 207 -223
5 , SR 60 Right-of- Way West of I- 95 — James B . Cain
Contract
(memorandum dated May 30, 200 1 ) 224-235
H. Utilities
None
I. Human Services
None
12 . COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
10
e�
a>42. •ct . . ._z� a2s r ? ,.. s e ,�$� t§� ,�t ". g >~4 r flt .��" .'� > , f ,�. � r `^� si p"aA '; 'rr
, :; r ,. a` w �, � . , „4 r> �
,. k S4 3 wY h F+ .t .a v-.._f,,,'+.,'?ffi::.9..'.-..t.v.n.f � an:,,,Y•..*>3_'£h+L�,;§'Z.'.'':.,,.y,,...�.r,'*-, a5vn`. y,a'4xd:_...�,.z':..,....,._«
.r..S`,R~* eY�4 a,-.,..,._.w__.,a.,.:_..x.,.,+S r rti �,4. f.r«...'�a".cx:,...,:..:::9,e,stx,Yi t... t. ...:-...`•,z, .i yc, ., •k� ..,..k}"a.,,:Y;'�F> �\ M iS .,t..,.o ,R,j,-_X'.1
+ x#•;a. v,*Y.,rxti+a..,s ra *. y>r, k „'32;.._+. "�*7`v`u,'-t�,r. �.ft y"`-s".',cgw.Y*ezcs.hqr-�:
,
;C3
t
d ', a , .,x�«„`d . :. ... " . �. ,,•; ... , ",� bt : .. : _- .3`-. ... . .,.ary e •k, i � :es � ,:., ->' r ....
+. . .... :. r Y . . . ._. � .. a. . .. , ,. v3.. .. a :. 'y ,h
" yt • x'.�..Mzt :. . ... . n<. ,, . ,,,.. -, . v . e w ,mv - �.. , a �a., p9 4+ _ �` �
� .•s Y^ <d.:,w ,.,. ., .n. ,§ r c § .:,;., Yc � _, 3 � , .„.N �' . a a*�` .�L. .>9E�.
�"y�� .-, . . > ; ; . . .rh ,c u£ V.;..,.. , .-.,? t Lr ;K r ,.,:, s . s>: 5 . :. "s z -.
, � 5 '.u,` 1 3, . . Xn , . `ri.'Jyi3 ., �. r', w4'.• xr'+ F'`� x wX h„-,;�
mx:;x ..� .. # . . _ . . : f . . . 3^. p• . .._�.,`, . 1Y'Y • .s 3'. � v v. . 1„ .a 's.:h„'r�; ^ , 2' r < .,
5^ . , vt7 E. . r ^t,... ,ro._�.. t »=:.w rt� J:. lX, k�. .,� `ry aN `k: ,�. 3
4k w .., r` .".. ,c:?' ...... ' -, � �� •. •: '? ,-s fix;;§' > r.,.r , '� a s x y n '.a -
'�' '. . , ... r .:. r . . -. �`,�. �:, rt3. � �. r..•xw"' . :.: r '�' � , ; 5 e ,i'” ;r~;�
�` y'w< , o-^'S,� r'7 c r* ,$} "✓' m ° t x3 "Lk'{paxR ,t-tt'�`s3 :rid' a ''uX a�'sC'a
&at:u -t-.,_.. .«. :. . �. ,. .r._wi . . ..�. n -. . . .-s .. ; � a w�r,:A. a"k a •.Yt,.. , . , . �c z'-Y w";-. ku.,,. .< _
k ,'' a5 , a ,. _.,. _n „'; . r 4 `'?.,- _ ar ,. .x . . . : 5 _. ,F xw> ... . x.S _-.,z k-.� .. +,, . _._.
, _r .. e ,...,:,�...,(.a. �� 4 � , r.�dt:n .,,=_ >r... _,k z,. ., � >, . .
x ti
r,x- `x. .,r .r. . ., y,.,, ,st $ i. d.e"G - ..,, t w� ,- <;y.;..,, w =s T•fi ,::;,., s
%r.,+; , a"i
r. . . . . . *.5 YE S
: „r•. .x :.alk: p r. :..a.. y ,,. ,. ' 'a,. > . sft'..:'Y'§~if ^ ,,:!Ee x :m., e " : ;. A „ 3-
, r•.e•';:, :J r ° ,.: '. n t s ,,.,, ti's
u !'... � °. r �,
, . ..-: - ��j' 3 rt , +. . . . 4 . .- .,.;w c . f •..5 3'"n. >a e `� =4 i`u - � '. 2Y .:i ' : +,:: . 'k
'^ 1 r 1 ,a= 2 Y. ..:. +, t X, .
- > 2 Y' i Y f .. . Y y§ x. t .a. { t ., du,- .. F . R -fi. . ♦ . '. .-„ a f.. a ".. . . .
.. .R. .. w Yi l r., c . . - o c..
°3- - � ,.: f- ¢ ..�..+ ,-,a. rc . }r ««„�� ,`�^ .si�,, - .-.. <. Y . 3{6 < ^^ <. . `I , ...rv`
c , ,: Yx �` k --� n.0 -: . •-.m. i,l. .
,..t,., .. i a », .. �tN„q. - .,,, >. . '�”. fix: . , . , .:awn< " ,� °. 3<.r. , . �•r:: ,e ', . ._„r . .
f s .,,-w
,,.. . . .. ,. ..x. x. . . , wn . qi ., x � t { ,,. ,- v ^±. t . .. 'i` L. 4
> - `t :,. e�,.. • � ,q'�,�: i s ,v„ ._a < a x '.a ,r' "� .
sgw• nt :fn^ a r+'. s, s ^4vr& Y. . t; pya. � x. xa . ;:per` rte ,*' .y,: v i .k .,; c T z . . ,i „
r•�'' r ;k3' 1 1r'r'u” .: a C-
• ar Ap { r' >P, m w A .^.15:.. - { x% �.K:, q:'- , r , ,wu,,w m x ;}- v ,•" c` 7 ae' f
�•} e f w,x, a..: fit" �; y w3;k ,�„' a;'v'x 2a ^'�" ti cr j`x 4 .. 3 t
13 . COMMISSIONERS ITEMS BACKUP
A. Chairman Caroline D . Ginn PAGES
Be Vice Chairman Ruth M. Stanbrid e
Updates
Ce Commissioner Fran Be Adams
Station 3 Ambulance Service Request
(memorandum dated May 30 , 2001 ) 236-237
D . Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Ee Commissioner John We Tippin
14 . SPECIAL DISTRICTSBOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
Be Solid Waste Disposal District
1 . Approval of Minutes — meeting of 5115101
2 . Resolution of Utility Advisory Committee
Solid Waste Disposal District Master Plan
(continued from BCC meeting of May 22 , 200 1 )
(memorandum dated May 14 , 2001 ) 238
C . Environmental Control Board
None
15 . ADJOURNMENT
or D �
P
if
r
y ,Y T. 1, 4, ' ' :b u°`+ •..,„g.. r °Ai£ ,'�§.s' °F. : a£. ,3r; v k` ntl ' " itrot
f ' 2. < _ -, .s Y "-f ✓ F o > 4 r K d ;, bra w, r
r . . 't•F 5 ax § 1 T a':' 4 . .t 'u. x 3
:.r " E f a ^,...' e ,?P.N. §: '} .s s .,,:,_,
fi•�, -.:,,: e-ar; Fc` , "tiKt' r ' r. x, -- , , < ,' a ..r it <.TW 'u
., `F �4F „�:*. �~<n i - ' . w .:A S A ti,1, x• •+ . .w .xi. `+7 '� `hv r t
":F ',a ,�,+et .mr;,- w l
+;,tr , f 1 Yf ✓ . Zs t ,,, ,4. , «.. t ,, , y.. '. A ^ -Fr ' ' "v t 3^fY
e
,
r§i v.. „!� ka.,. . x,: � x .� Ysk� -.'{+��� APs. �,_ .,. � ro.. . . .:.-., .,. h5 t , :,,r . ,. , �• ,. .,:'s
r „� '.:: ;~"
f n ., < • wr y . m ..,a e _" ` z
';ref , ; r x< :..: �. °� v `-. . 4l . ` s? i,v... - <a r,✓4 s;n:.- a 'i t a .),„ i } .f. k' t
.. ,,. yr:,s .. . s . . .,r, r2 ',
If
xY ,
-,Ya + n 'X% {'3.
,� "2 1 :
y . .0 ¢ , U =r' ti'
t" r % xJ -. +£
J`3. .,... .. y . -: ,.,fit
t c a;»a .eb a" • : „ , . :� s�. w . ,^'o. : _ .a fn;<:; ,. , ,{ .rc v. . t - „ a:: ,€
.
. 3,:• .v � .. x. .- 1`+ . ,y, ., tmn, , :, x ^::c 9, v >. c ;s', lii , - <s a >t
• ia {, :-� € ::. .
, ` �•r, .'rii e'rA.G.. z, ' .. °kG� 2' .dz .xe' ..'L3 �a "`sk°s '�>� '+r„ ' � .;;. f,' r :„x , ". i3 ?S t„a.. ,t' .+'�i e,.
. r , , . ,.- .. , ,. . ":-T , ... , , ,x -. < : _ ,. ° , r ,: 3< :`3'°'. t.'-- s .� � . " 3 . J , ,,n , , w..T: _ ;^zx < ,
c , ,*:, ,.. .fi, . .0 . . ,, rr., z4^ .. ,. .. -. , r. .! . y „ . ___• ,.. . . S .+Gi,. .: r "� . ... '�? .
, ;: m. ,.. ,,, c ,..., a :. : r YW ,;.. Y , '. ! t { ... x �i ; S ^.. "K
>,.. _.,x �' ,N, ., � `^£ y . '2.F,4 `i- . , i ex �: ..M . . � N s S• ao > . . s, .::.� f . .:o �.+...
{ as Y e t a ,.»s .r '',' #`q' ✓ t -f , }z^x
... v` _ .K:: , },.F..
.. ..,. "§` .� . . , .a. >#' ,..., ,« ,, . F
. .._ . q . , , - „r...K A;A , r";;. r, d 1 A, e ,. .:.
Al, �” �' �i '�^.�F:aasv;;._: i fir' b.. axrofaxfi't. F � s?. � W-, n '}s�. rF Ltw "c: . .:. �' �"': .
2 r :+ {" �sa<' A` - . ..;;s� rF3h -"a.w? Y'^4L ±� � .;..: ..:, .. . . . ., S +"n
h, r1Z.
+ll' 1� t' t ; 'S�''v4 '. . rr `R � 3�� '+" '.- '4�cid284-P '4^r'fr^` .>•� - .x.J av v^t,^ .i , y ,w? ., �
'.. a k} . : „. ^e' tt r .N � 1�. ;�h'{ � t;', �
. , -, _, , , Y •• ^ .^ ,. M � '1r "b* Safi '�fi
— tom?^ � } g Ue ^ 4 K . 9 +��N' .d •"�' p � ,�`�'. 'Y u � " tl ' r_ °Yi� � h^ 6
}np �,< ..+✓ `'lh .`-Ki
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based .
Anyone who. needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County ' s
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567 - 8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting .
Indian River County WebSite : http : //bccl . co . indian -river. fl . us
Full agenda back -up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library , and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13
Rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1 : 00 p. m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12: 00 noon until
5 : 00 p. m .
u rG 366
r
k
r ""> : .s 3• ..:?' s y�y.. c, .',�' `:£k Y " - x" @ rT,cr. ""�! `„,Ax .+'`.sc t-� s. i'a h x ai - ,ra', i
r: r Sr: ��ex:e � s . .: °
x "' „�^. a :. T F ^�."S•i?S'oxh..:Ty 'A w` . . s h ,- � � x� y F,.,: , ,a
d , t ,er: z g�. : .? h , .:':E,�' w azo `La„,� %r ,+✓1' �E tz5"?� , -k: "�, . ;v r "4 r", x c §. r S i
� r '°e' >r,%� ��v S>, r y f �� o ;. r
�Kh y z ^�„ ✓eh ,+' �� �tx"�z`^�.+"'tk+ j "',GrTc �h.. i `.."n'E�' Z :`kf rd N , } t ,' R +. _7 yk �' a t �'=r r
E . K, d"A .e. s r .%1„ "..
X p
d a °a i% `3 " ` 5 d' „• tu '^er+a :.ryr, Y '`-x`^�r M,ks ;,._? x, ; J s :h y ..,+ ..:F f. ',,.
r si F "-.. n „ i rs`s� �T [ .
1's,
s a'f r
vY t e n
a , �.va. .�, y „ .. .e �; L; w."x• w . 2 .,.� x
BUN
0 } •. iJ 5 y7ra"»F wl
tl
U
tt
• . t T.R.
}
j
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JUNE 53 2001
1 . CALL TO ORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 -
2 . INVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 -
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 -
4 . ADDITIONS /DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS . . . . - 2 -
5 . PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
- 2 -
Proclamation Honoring State Representative Bob Allen , District 32
6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 17 , 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . - 5 -
6 . 13 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 1 , 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . - 5 -
6 . C . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 8 , 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . - 5 -
JUNE 59 2001 �A p F
- 1 -
✓ x '&x"a,w '{ :{, ,na� 5 �4�r� �eAc.r �"L yr pi^� .4- � .="c r3^j ^� e �, �, � , i i r ; .= `,
i � twt^ r�^v# 'SF'"��tx; y3��r�`>f�x�3 ! t� �yc is s yx^' ] x{ .,� • r rG ..f.,�.`y •+( vrtY _101� I r''gl_ rl ,i r
Y,� •ry% '� ,{ ' Y<
C xt r i ,•; v �� s • � 'w 4, y t .r -:... ,
` V
IT
17
III
FT
f t x _ t ,ra. }
r,= z ' e r z r K „ r a
I II IF I IT
, y, 11
£ - - a # r M M k r
-1 IIF� •>'Y £' �i r :� FITT I, I a t
u ` n ' , ^ , >„1 ... dr z•ka ,��+ - # , 4 4 ,ye fi a �4z
*.. ., �� , a ,ytim �r =s �i` F � b r, x„, t3sr ” - n * `g" ' 1 «?
.� IF IF
A T<
. , ., t
7 , CONSENT AGENDA - 6 -
TA , Reports , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , - 6 -
7 . 13 . List of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 6 -
7 - C . List of Warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 14 -
7 . 13 . State Revenue Sharing Application for 2001 - 02 - Sheriff - Emergency
Services Department (Florida Department of Revenue) . . . . . . . . . . . . - 26 -
7 . E . Local Mitigation Strategy Plan - Modification of Projects - Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council - Department of Community Affairs Grant
(Florida Front Porch Initiative Community Designation - Gifford
Progressive Civic League ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 27 -
7 . F . Surplus Vehicle Reinstatement as a Fixed Asset - Reinstate Vehicle # 243
and Surplus Vehicle # 145A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 29 -
7 . G . Library Expansion - Rental of Storage Space at US # 1 Trade Center from
Jannach Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 -
TH . Florida Department of Law Enforcement Grants - ( I ) Multi -Agency Drug
Enforcement Unit [M . A . C . E . ] , ( 2 ) PREVENT [ Substance Abuse Council ]
and ( 3 ) Substance Abuse Council of Indian River County - FY 2001 - 02
Anti - Drug Abuse Grant Funding - Sheriff . 31 -
7 . I . Miscellaneous Budget Amendment # 019 . 33 -
7 . J . Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver - Dana Schmidt - Lot 2 , Block 21 ,
Vero Lake Estates , Unit 4 ( 8045 92 "d Avenue ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . - 35 -
7 . K . Payments to Vendors of Court- Related Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . - 37 -
71 . GEN Development, Inc . - Request for Final Plat Approval for The Preserve
at Vero Beach ( f/k/a Southlakes ) Phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . - 39 -
JUNE 59 2001 �r i r ;
Ob
fl h - uc a
r` '. 5 r r' I'TI4 3
zt
^ f Z .e1t,.. x hiaa aM' 3ypyp iYl '� y.. ; ' ITY t ' x t
II IF 4F
�': q,S «x, f t #?x l 3 3F l3 ° t •, F i •5" ' F r
r = r$ r r r "
r .� b ^u 3- >5 }- . ✓v` s `h+"L , x.>4 �. x ' � � + .: e i ° T. "II +.
t i x „..
. , . _ , . „ . 't » . , _ _ , .. < . a , . _.�. ,. , . ,
. . s
r f 3 t y
d,
r
� ,
9 . A . 1 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 054 APPROVING THE TRANSFER
OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE FROM FALCON CABLE MEDIA , A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , A/K/A CHARTER CABLE , LLC . TO
TCI CABLEVISION OF MISSOURI , INC . D/B /A AT& T BROADBAND - 41 -
9A . 22 , PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 055 APPROVING THE
TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW ( TO AMEND
THE TEXT OF THE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REVISE THE " CULTURAL " OBJECTIVE AND
POLICIES ) AMENDMENT CPTA 2001 - 01 - 0109 - Legislative . . . . . . . . . . . - 48 -
9A . 3 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 056 APPROVING THE
TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW ( TO AMEND
THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY ' S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) ( CLONTZ PROPERTY) ( TRANSITIONAL
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ) - Legislative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . - 57 -
JUNE 59 2001 � �
BA b 0 9
- 3 -
+ k'`
_
a 1 t' � y + ✓ S s "' . y
Mt }
-
4
F
a '
, . e ,z_ a . aF. _ >i . T . �.,", .. ,. T .,. . r <..cora X✓3 aare.4r.. . , _ . . . ., _ . _.
. - . , ._ _ , . ,. . F . . ._ , ., .
Is" ': ;
9 . A . 4 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 057 APPROVING THE
TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW ( TO
REDESIGNATE t 164 . 1 ACRES FROM AG - 1 TO T AND TO EXPAND THE
URBAN SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE THOSE ± 164 , 1 ACRES ) ( 1 . GERALD
CLONTZ - ± 30 . 8 Acres , 2 . BEUTTELL DEVELOPMENT, LLC . - ± 76 . 8 Acres ,
AND 3 . INDIAN RIVER EXCHANGE PACKERS , INC . AND MIRAFLORES ,
INC . - ± 56 . 5 Acres ) - 80 -
9 . C . PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 101 -
9 . C . 1 . Public Hearings Scheduled for June 12 , 2001 : - 101 -
a . Vero Beach Development Association - Request to Rezone ± 10 . 6
Acres Located Approximately One - Quarter Mile East of US # 1 and
X180 Feet North of 97 `t' Lane from RS - 1 to RM - 6 ( Quasi - Judicial )
. . . . . . . 101 -
b . St . Johns River Water Management District - Request for Right - of-
Way Abandonment for a Number of Rights - of- Way Within a Portion
of the Fellsmere Farm Company Subdivision , Located South of the
Town of Fellsmere and East of Willow Street (Legislative ) - 101 -
c . Approval of Purchase of the Walker Parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt
Marsh Environmental Land Acquisition Project, Using
Environmental Land Acquisition Bond Funds (Legislative ) . . - 101 -
JUNE 512001 B : ;
-4 -
w
,
t. _ s °Z' aY ,� �" _,. P ' S � �Ft*-� +n�"alc�"•%"rt k+ >:v'. 4 "'C,� k ySe { �" { +t�" 4+�'u.,G y,& v�'�' 4 :X_5 v.
;Y �'� �...2 %;t� .ib ' e,� A
, ., .�. . . > . . Y . , bs. a^z *iv §¢ x x 3"�F.�{r'Xe �;". ,} ✓„� .� r�,;-
i
i
•
9 . C . 2 . Public Hearings Scheduled for June 19 , 2001 : - 101 -
a . Thomas S . Hammond - Request to Rezone 18 . 7 Acres Located
Approximately One - Quarter Mile East of 43 `d Avenue , on the South
Side of 41 " Street from CG to IL ( Quasi- Judicial ) - 101 -
b . Land Development Regulation (LDR) Amendments - New Standards
Involving Fire Vehicle Movement Through Sites and Building
Access for Such Vehicles , and Other Fire Protection Items
( Legislative ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 102 -
10 . PROPOSED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY MEETING
REGARDING CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS - 104 -
I I . C . 1 . SHOOTING RANGE - GRAND OPENING - FISH & WILDLIFE
CONSERVATION COMMISSION - 105 -
1 1 , C , 2 ,
105 -11 . C . 2 . BID # 3058 - NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY RENOVATIONS -
CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC , . . . . . . . - 106 -
1 I . C , 35
106 -11 . C . 3 , SHERIFF DEPARTMENT EVIDENCE STORAGE ADDITION - DOW
HOWELL GILMORE ASSOCIATES , INC . - ARCHITECTS FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - 108 -
JUNE 59 2001 PG
- 5 -
w
4
� n
Y
I LG , 1 , FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL
AGREEMENT - ROSELAND ROAD SIDEWALK AND JUNGLE
TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND WILDLIFE REFUGE - PROJECTS 9916 AND
9724 . . . . . . .
I I . G . 2 . BID # 3061 - SEBASTIAN CANOE LAUNCH - SUMMIT
CONSTRUCTION - PROJECT 9819 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . - 111 -
11 . G . 3 . BID # 3062 - MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE SIDEWALKS PROJECT -
PROJECT # 0012 - AWARD BID ON 5TH STREET SW SIDEWALK TO
BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES , INC . - REJECT REMAINDER OF BID
. 113 -
1 I . G . 4 .
113 -11 . G . 4 . 58TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS , PHASE I1 - RIGHT- OF - WAY
ACQUISITION - PARCEL NO . 129 , W . D . GRAVES III AND FRANCES
ELLIS GRAVES - PROJECT # 8823 1 . . 115 -
1 LG . 5 , SR- 60 FOUR-LANE WIDENING WEST OF I- 95 - RIGHT- OF - WAY
ACQUISITION - JAMES B . CAIN ( SEE MINUTES OF MAY 15 , 2001
MEETING FOR PRIOR APPROVAL ) - 117 -
JUNE 59 2001 _
�y 3 2
- 6 -
j t Y S
fi � �
P
[ Y
.. 113 � 21
•
13 . 13 . VICE CHAIRMAN RUTH M . STANBRIDGE - UPDATES ( [ I ] LOST
TREE ISLANDS , [ 2 ] DEMINERALIZATION CONCENTRATION
DESIGNATION APPROVED BY LEGISLATURE { S13 536/1-113 1831 } ,
[ 3 ] STORMWATER MASTER PLAN , PHASE II , AND [ 4 ] ST .
SEBASTIAN RIVER DE- MUCKING PROJECT) 119 -
13 . C . COMMISSIONER FRAN B . ADAMS - EMERGENCY SERVICES
STATION 3 (2900 43rd Avenue) - AMBULANCE SERVICE REQUEST
BY VICTOR HART, SR , TO EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
ADVISORY COMMITTEE (ESDAC ) - 120 -
13 , D ,
20 -13 . D . COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT - PERSONAL COMMENTS
. . . . . . . - 124 -
14 , A , EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . - 124 -
14 . 13 . SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . - 125 -
14 , C , ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD - 125 -
JUNE 59 2001 r
3I U 37 3
- 7 -
7777777vmF - 7 W7
7777 ,
eel
v ar . . . rc r.n is .. e .. .. ,.. . •.,a
n • tp Si a . ... j � i
June 5 , 2001
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County , Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers , 1840 25 `h Street , Vero Beach , Florida , on
Tuesday , June 5 , 2001 , at 9 : 00 a . m . Present were Caroline D . Ginn , Chairman ; Ruth M .
Stanbridge , Vice Chairman ; Kenneth R . Macht ; John W . Tippin ; and Fran B . Adams . Also
present were James E . Chandler, County Administrator ; Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney ;
and Patricia "PJ" Jones , Deputy Clerk .
1 . CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Ginn called the meeting to order .
2 . INVOCATION
Planning Director Stan Boling delivered the Invocation .
3 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Tippin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag .
JUNE 59 2001
- 1 -
i ° G3 4
If I If
If
If
4 . ADDITIONS /DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAIEMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Ginn requested 2 changes to today ' s Agenda :
1 . Add Item 5 . , Proclamation Honoring Representative Bob Allen .
2 . Add Item 10 , Proposed Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting Regarding
Contract Negotiations with the International Association of FireFighters .
Commissioner Macht requested the addition of Item 13 . D . , Personal Comments .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously added the above items to the
Agenda .
5 . PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
PROCLAMATION HONORING STATE REPRESENTATIVE BOB ALLEN DISTRICT
32
The Chairman presented the following Proclamation to Representative Bob Allen :
JUNE 5 , 2001At u v 375
h 5
III If
1 41
If
r �_
3 y
t ;
f
•
I
I
PROCLAMATION
I
HONORING
REPRESENTATIVE BOB ALLEN
WHEREAS , the Honorable Bob Allen , State Representative for District
32 , has done an outstanding job in his first year as a Freshman Legislator; and
WHEREAS , while serving on the Transportation Economic Development
Appropriations Committee , Representative Allen represented Indian River County -
and
WHEREAS , Representative Allen was successful in the acquisition of a
$ 250 , 000 State grant for the Old Fellsmere School renovation , assisted in
obtaining a grant for McKee Botanical Gardens , and was instrumental in assuring
that funding for the widening of State Road 60 west of 1 - 95 stayed in the State
budget .
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board
recognizes the accomplishments of Representative Bob Allen , and thanks him for
his efforts on behalf of Indian River County .
Adopted this 5th day of June , 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caroline D . Ginn , Ch firman
JUNE 59 2001 nil
376
- 3 -
e
j S,e
Representative Allen thanked the Board and noted that his District runs from Orange
County to Indian River County . He also appreciated the warm welcome he has received .
He stated that he worked hard to keep the County ' s items from being bumped out of the
budget . He believed everyone worked hard on the projects involved and the monies are well
deserved . He and Representative Stan Mayfield worked tirelessly on the Indian River
Memorial Hospital open heart surgery matter and almost got it approved but it was derailed
at the last minute . He reported on several other projects including the optical scanners for
each county ' s elections office and the water provisions for the western part of the County .
His office in Fellsmere will be opened every other Thursday and will have a local telephone
number . He noted that there is a lot of pressure building to redraw the district lines , saying
that District 32 is not needed . He certainly will fight to keep Indian River County and looked
forward to working with the Board .
Chairman Ginn complimented Representative Allen on a very successful freshman
year .
Commissioner Adams commented that she believed one of the reapportionment
hearings will be held in Vero Beach , and Representative Allen confirmed that one will be
held in Orange County and one in Vero Beach . He strongly recommended a large turnout
at these meetings .
Representative Allen then presented a support letter for the Florida Front Porch
Initiative Designation for Gifford .
JUNE 512001 {
r
- 4 -
77
6 . A . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 17 , 2001
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of April 17 , 2001 . There were none .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams .
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin , the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 17 . 2001 , as written .
O . B . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 14 2001
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of May 1 , 2001 . There were none .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of May 1 , 2001 , as written .
O . C . APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 8 , 2001
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of May 8 , 2001 . There were none .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin , the Board
unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of May 8 , 2001 .
JUNE 59 2001 � lip r 78
- 5 -
S t
dqe
7 . CONSENT AGENDA
Vice Chairman Stanbridge requested that Item 7 . E , be separated from the agenda .
7. A . REPORTS
The following has been received and is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board :
1 . Fellsmere Water Control District : (a) District Map and (b ) Annual Budget for
FY 2001 - 02
7. B. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 17 , 2001 :
TO : HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS DATE : MAY 17, 2001
FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136. 06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes .
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants , issued by the Clerk to
the Board, for the time period of May 17, 2001 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as
issued by the Clerk to the Board for May 17 , 2001 ,
as recommended by staff.
JUNE 59 2001 rill ! ,
U J79
- 6 -
n
CHECK CHECK
CHECK NAME DATE AMOUNT
NUMBER
2001 - 05 - 17 548 . 00
0302504 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 738 . 54
0302505 ACTION PRINTERS 2001 - 05 - 17 285 . 25
0302506 ALBERTSON ' S # 4357 2001 - 05 - 17 22 . 34
0302507 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 2001 - OS - 17 82 . 66
0302508 APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO 2001 - 05 - 17 25 . 70
0302509 ATCO TOOL SUPPLY 2001 - 05 - 17 897 . 88
0302510 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH , 2001 - 05 - 17 106 . 75
0302511 AWWA CUSTOMER SERVICE 2001 - 05 - 17 10 , 364 , 97
0302512 ABS PUMPS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 281 . 00
0302513 AQUAGENIX 2001 . 05 - 17 72 , 50
0302514 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 2001 - 05 - 17 863 . 94
0302515 ADDISON OIL CO 2001 - 05 - 17 21421 . 36
0302516 AMERICAN AIR FILTER INT ' L 301 . 97
_
0302517 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 17
2001 - 05 - 17 20 . 77
0302518 A T & T 2001 - 05 - 17 24 . 85
0302519 ALLTECH WATER COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 17 298 . 00
0302520 A E ROBERTS COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 17 483 . 87
0302521 ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 090 . 60
0302522 AUTO PARTS OF VERO , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 49 . 70
0302523 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 538 . 61
0302524 ARCH WIRELESS 2001 - 05 - 17
2001 - 05 - 17 72 . 26
0302525 APOLLO ENTERPRISES 2001 - 05 - 17 7 , 310 . 16
0302526 ASSOCIATES , THE 2001 - 05 - 17 97 . 62
0302527 ABC PRINTING CO _ 15 , 578 , 29
0302528 ARBOR TRACE DEVELOPMENT , INC 2001 - OS - 17 186 . 50
0302529 ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC 2001 - 05 - 17 321 . 63
0302530 BAIRD , JOSEPH A 2001 - 05 - 17 6 . 00
0302531 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 2001 - 05 - 17 47 , 505 . 61
0302532 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 05 - 17 3 , 925 . 75
0302533 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 05 - 17 58 , 11
0302534 BARTON , JEFFREY K - CLERK 2001 - 05 - 17 426 . 24
0302535 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 000 . 00
0302536 BURGOON BERGER 2001 - 05 - 17 777 . 44
0302537 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 250 . 00
0302538 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL , TOBACCO & 2001 - 05 - 17 2001 - 05 - 17 77 . 63
0302539 BRODART CO 254 . 70
0302540 BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION _2001 - 05 - 17 159 . 65
0302541 BURNETT , EDWIN 146 . 48
0302542 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302543 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2001 - 05 - 17 3 . 60g 718 . 23
0302544 BRYANT , MILLER AND OLIVE , P A 2001 - 05 - 17
0302545 BELLSOUTH 174 , 8787.
74
2001 - 05 - 17 27 , 1
0302546 BEAZER HOMES , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
500 , 00
0302547 BEIDLER , HENRY 2001 - 05 - 17 414 . 1354 . 00
0302548 BASS - CARLTON SOD INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302549 B & S SOD INC
2001 - 05 - 17 545 . 00
JUNE 59 2001 1 u h' 0
- 7 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER
DATE AMOUNT ,
0302550 BRIGGS EQUIPMENT 2001 - 05 - 17
0302551 BILL HEARD CHEVROLET INC 32 , 00
2001 - OS - 17 15 , 2218 .18 , 00
0302552 BELLSOUTH
2001 - 05 - 17 545 . 75
0302553 53
CAMERON
BARKLEY COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 17 389 . 83
0302554 CAMP , DRESSER & MCKEE , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 91915 , 19
0302555 CENTRAL WINDOW OF 2001 - 05 - 17
160 , 00
0302556 CHLORINATORS , INC806 , 85
2001 - OS - 17 806 . 85
0302557 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS 2001 - 05 - 17
0302558 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC 521 . 41
2001 - OS - 17 301 . 05
0302559 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO 2001 - 05 - 17
00 , 00
0302560 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5
2001 - OS - 17 2 , 51977 , 27, 27
0302561 CLINIC PHARMACY 2001 - 05 - 17
0302562 CALL ONE , INC 113 . 10
2001 - OS - 17 25 . 00
0302563 CUES , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302564 COMMUNITY CHILD CARE RESOURCES 2001 - 05 - 17 544 . 56
0302565 CIT GROUP , THE 17 , 4
7 . 44
9
2001 - 05 - 17 79 . 33
0302566 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2001 - 05 - 17
0302567 COPYCO , LIBERTY DIV OF 69
2001 - 05 - 17 55 . 69 1 , 1 55 ,
0302568 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
2001 - 05 - 17 2r261 , 90 15208
2001 - 05 - 17 152 . 08
0302569 CLEVELAND GOLF CO . , INC , ,
0302570 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
2001 - 05 - 17 383 . 70 26 , 37
0302571 COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC
0302572 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 2001 - 05 - 17 26 . 37
2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 689 . 00
0302573 CALLAWAY GOLF BALL CO
2001 - 05 - 17 1 ,2001 - 05 - 17 8
325 , 03
0302574 CINGULAR WIRELESS 856 , 86
2001 - 05 - 17 3
0302575 COX , BRIANNA 38 , 62
2001 - 05 - 17 5000
2
0302576 CARON , MARK A 0 ,
0302577 COOL , KIMBERLY 2001 - 05 - 17
8 , 0000
0302578 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS DIVISION 2001 - 05 - 17 40 , 00
2001 - 05
0302579 CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING & 99 ,
0302580 DAVES SPORTING GOODS - 17 424 , 50
2001 - 05 - 17
0302581 DEBLOIS , ROLAND M . 1 , 00
1
0302582 DEMCO INC 2001 - OS - 17 11 . 00
0302583DICKERSON- FLORIDA , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 072 . 50
0302584 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 722 . 77
2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 080 . 00
0302585 DOW , HOWELL , GILMORE ,
2001 - 05 - 17 3 , 123 , 24
558 , 15
0302586 DATA SUPPLIES , INC
0302587 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 558 . 15
2001 - 05 - 17 419 . 00
0302588 DADE PAPER COMPANY
0302589 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 062 . 41
0302590 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 05 - 17 129 , 00
0302591 DILLON , EDWARD D 2001 - 05 - 17 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 00 , 00
3
0302592 DIAL , CORDY & ASSOCIATES INC 2001 - 05 - 17 300 . 00
0302593 DAVID G PHILLIPS PUBLISHING CO 2001 - 05 - 17 26 , 658 . 63
0302594 DELL , PAUL MD 00
0302595 E - Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 2001 - 05 - 17 4550 .0 , 00
112 . 25
JUNE 59 2001 fPG 38
f
- 8 -
17 a
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0302596 ELLIS K PHELPS AND CO , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 278 , 52
0302597 E G P INC 2001 - 05 - 17 483 . 92
0302598 EXPEDITER INC , THE 2001 - 05 - 17 88 . 04
0302599 EDUCATIONAL DESIGN , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 8 . 95
0302600 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 929 . 50
0302601 EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE 2001 - 05 - 17 31151 . 74
0302602 EVERGLADES FARM 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 180 . 96
0302603 FEDEX 2001 - 05 - 17 29 , 92
0302604 FELLSMERE , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 17
0302605 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 19 . 83
2001 - OS - 17 143 . 52
0302606 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO 2001 - 05 - 17 825 . 00
0302607 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF 2001 - 05 - 17
0302608 FLORIDA COCA - COLA BOTTLING CO 2001 - 05 - 17 225 . 00
390 . 20
0302609 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW
2001 - 05 - 17 450 . 00
0302610 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 17
0302611 FLORIDA SLUDGE , INC 26 , 120 . 36
2001 - 05 - 17 6 , 498 . 00
0302612 FLORIDA TODAY / USA TODAY 2001 - 05 - 17
0302613 FOOTJOY 51
,
2001 - 05 - 17 102 , 51
02 102 . 51
0302614 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2001 - 05 - 17
0302615 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF 194 . 92
2001 - OS - 17 125 . 00
0302616 FLORES , JESSE 2001 - 05 - 17
0302617 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF 90 . 60
0302618 FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS OF SOUTH 2001 - 05 - 17 25552
255 ,
0302619 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE . 52
0302620 FIRST UNION 2001 - 05 - 17 2001 - 05 - 17 4 , 599 . 92
0302621 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE 2001 - 05 - 17 11 , 735 . 32
0302622 FAIRWAYS AT GRAND HARBOR , LTD 2001 - 05 - 17 27 . 16
0302623 FLORIDA IRRIGATION SOCIETY 1 , 000 . 00
0302624 FORT PIERCE , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 17 25 . 00
2001 - 05 - 17 35 . 00
0302625 FANTASI INTERNATIONAL CORP
2001 - 05 - 17 476 . 98
0302626 GALE GROUP , THE
2001 - 05 - 17 389 . 24
0302627 GAYLORD BROTHERS , INC
2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 786 . 52
0302628 GENERAL GMC , TRUCK
0302629 GENE ' S AUTO GLASS 2001 - 05 - 17 279 . 40
2001 - 05 - 17 210 . 00
0302630 GLIDDEN COMPANY , THE
0302631 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 5 - 17 229 . 91
0302632 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 514 . 07
0302633 GREYHOUND LINES , INC . 2001 - OS - 17 1 , 173 . 16
2001 - 05 - 17 304 . 85
0302634 GEAR FOR SPORTS
2001 - 05 - 17 199 . 18
0302635 GARD DISTRIBUTING CO
2001 - 05 - 17 630 . 00
0302636 GEORGIA RUBBER
0302637 GOULD , COOKSEY , FENNELL , O ' NEILL 2001 - 05 - 17 2001 - 05 - 17
770 . 00
0302638 GORMAN , MINDY 22 , 323 . 00
0302639 GALLERIA PRESS 2001 - 05 - 17 57 . 93
0302640HARRIS SANITATION , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 295 . 30
2001 - 05 - 17 32 . 96
0302641
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2001 - 05 - 17 14 , 625 . 00
JUNE 5 2001 n
' `rirsFu2
- 9 -
IF
i
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0302642 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2001 - 05 - 17 190 . 64
0302643 HERITAGE BOOKS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 191 . 60
0302644 HIBISCUS CHILDREN ' S CENTER 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 083 . 33
0302645 HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH 2001 - 05 - 17 377 , 340 . 00
0302646 HACH COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 17 633 . 95
0302647 HILL MANUFACTURING 2001 - 05 - 17 183 . 05
0302648 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2001 - 05 - 17 6 . 00
0302649 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 000 . 00
0302650 HINTON ' S CARPET CLEANING 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 161 . 00
0302651 HOLIDAY INN KEY WEST 2001 - 05 - 17 198 . 00
0302652 HEALTHSOUTH HOLDINGS 2001 - 05 - 17 260 . 80
0302653 HARRIS , GREGORY PHD CVE 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 339 . 15
0302654 H T C INC 2001 - 05 - 17 445 . 65
0302655 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 05 - 17 90 , 476 . 68
0302656 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 05 - 17
0302657 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 250 . 00
0302658 INDIAN RIVER BLUEPRINT CO INC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 083 . 65
0302659 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001 - 05 - 17 67 20
0302660 INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2001 - 05 - 17 919 . 62
0302661 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 5 , 643 . 07
2001 - OS - 17 145 . 15
0302662 IBM CORPORATION 2001 - 05 - 17
0302663 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 47 . 00
2001 - OS - 17 75 . 00
0302664 INDIAN RIVER ALL - FAB , INC 2001 - 05 - 172 .2
0302665 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE 2001 - 05 - 17 25
0302666 ISADORA FASHIONS , INC 74 , 850 . 62
2001 - OS - 17 162 . 00
0302667 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY 2001 - 05 - 17
0302668 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 8 , 064 . 00
2001 - OS - 17 19 , 363 . 00
0302669 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2001 - 05 - 17
0302670 JIM WALTERS HOMES , INC 21 . 32
2001 - OS - 17 1 , 631 . 47
0302671 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA 2001 - 05 - 17
0302672 JLT INSURANCE SERVICES 1 , 295 . 03
2001 - 05 - 17 825 . 00
0302673 JOHNSON , ANSELMO , MURDOCH , 2001 - 05 - 17
0302674 JUSTUS , DANIELLE 3 . 911 . 82
2001 - OS - 17 75 . 96
0302675 KIMLEY - HORN & ASSOCIATES , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302676 KOUNS , DARLENE 10 , 125 . 00
2001 - OS - 17 87 . 55
0302677 KRUGER , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302678 KELLER , JENAE 158 . 15
2001 - OS - 17 38 . 62
0302679 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302680 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC . 438 . 06
2001 - OS - 17 897 . 45
0302681 L B SMITH , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302682 LFI VERO BEACH , INC 113 . 17
2001 - OS - 17 367 . 60
0302683 LESCO , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302684 LAND AND WATER 1 , 495 . 34
0302685 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 20 . 00
2001 - 05 - 17 34 . 80
0302686 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 2001 - 05 - 17
0302687 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION 301 . 90
2001 - OS - 17 500 . 00
JUNE 59 2001
i1 3I it i 4;
- 10 -
" . F ,
ROW
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMCUNT
0302688 LIGHTHOUSE ESMAR , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 471 . 60
0302689 LIGHTNING LEASING INC 2001 - 05 - 17 125 . 00
0302690 MARPAN SUPPLY COMPANY , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 360 . 00 .
0302691 MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 16 , 790 . 00 '
0302692 MCCALL ELECTRIC , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 414 . 50
0302693 MIKES GARAGE 2001 - 05 - 17 445 . 00
0302694 MUMFORD LIBRARY BOOKS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 3 , 665 . 18
0302695 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT CO 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 275 . 00
0302696 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & 2001 - 05 - 17 13 , 979 . 96
0302697 MASTELLER , MOLER & REED , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 350 . 00
0302698 MORGAN AND EKLUND , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 6 , 163 . 58
0302699 MAC PAPERS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 266 . 25
0302700 MID - STATE MECHANICAL 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 000 . 00
0302701 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 2001 - 05 - 17 27 . 98
0302702 MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 2001 - 05 - 17 366 . 00
0302703 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 000 . 00
0302704 MEZZINA , PATRICIA 2001 - 05 - 17 719 . 10
0302705 METZ , KYLE 2001 - 05 - 17 61 . 80
0302706 MCNEELY , SHARON R 2001 - 05 - 17 570 . 00
0302707 MEEKS , RONALD E 2001 - 05 - 17 145 . 98
0302708 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE 2001 - 05 - 17 34 , 036 . 67
0302709 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 17 195 . 71
0302710 NORTRAX SE L . L . C . 2001 - 05 - 17 46 . 76
0302711 NOEL , THOMAS 2001 - 05 - 17 59 . 22
0302712 NIKE GOLF 2001 - 05 - 17 52 . 98
0302713 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 883 . 88
0302714 OMNIGRAPHICS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 33 . 15
0302715 ON IT ' S WAY 2001 - 05 - 17 114( . 29
0302716 OFFICE DEPOT , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 3 , 821 . 87
0302717 ORIENTAL TRADING CO , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 73 . 70
0302718 ODOM , WILLIAM EVERETT 2001 - 05 - 17 253 . 63
0302719 PARKS RENTAL INC 2001 - 05 - 17 229 ,. 42
0302720 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 2001 - 05 - 17 256 . 48
0302721 PUBLIC DEFENDER 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 383 . 26
0302722 PETTY CASH 2001 - 05 - 17 30 . 12
0302723 PORT CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 05 - 17 13 , 556 . 61
0302724 PARKS RENTAL 2001 - 05 - 17 503 . 36
0302725 PATRICK EXTERMINATING , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 95 . 00
0302726 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2001 - 05 - 17 158 . 40
0302727 POMEROY COMPUTER RESOURCES 2001 - 05 - 17 716 . 00
0302728 POSTMASTER 2001 - 05 - 17 221 . 20
0302729 RADIOSHACK 2001 - 05 - 17 134 . 95
0302730 ROSELAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT 2001 - 05 - 17 17 . 00
0302731 RUSSELL CONCRETE , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 093 . 13
0302732 ROSEN CENTRE HOTEL 2001 - 05 - 17 516 . 00
0302733 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 938 , 853 . 74
JUNE 512001 i 'r► u
- 11 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
AMOUNT
0302734 RECORDED BOOKS , LLC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 094 . 60
0302735 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE 2001 - 05 - 17 46 . 20
0302736 ROYAL CUP COFFEE 2001 - 05 - 17 79 . 00
0302737 RAPP , PAMELA 2001 - 05 - 17 12 . 00
0302738 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 790 . 00
0302739 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 253 . 83
0302740 RIVERSIDE LEASING CO 2001 - 05 - 17 614 . 00
0302741 REXEL SOUTHER ELECTRICAL 2001 - 05 - 17 318 . 19
0302742 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET 2001 - 05 - 17 11479 . 28
0302743 RHINEHART , VALERIE 2001 - 05 - 17 540 . 60
0302744 R& B SUPPLY CO INC 2001 - 05 - 17 281 . 95
0302745 SCOTTY ' S , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 30 . 02
0302746 SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT 2001 - 05 - 17 80 . 00
0302747 SEWELL HARDWARE CO , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 317 . 91
0302748 SHORELAND DEVELOPMENT , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 502 . 47
0302749 SIR SPEEDY # 5054 2001 - 05 - 17 186 . 78
0302750 SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE 2001 - 05 - 17 80 . 00
0302751 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING , 2001 - 05 - 17 733 . 25
0302752 REXEL SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2001 - 05 - 17 42 . 91
0302753 STONE BROTHERS FUNERAL HOME 2001 - 05 - 17 300 . 00
0302754 SCHOLARLY RESOURCES , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 126 . 02
0302755 STEIL , HOLLY 2001 - 05 - 17 65 . 00
0302756 SEBASTIAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2001 - 05 - 17 12 . 00
0302757 SHADY OAK ANIMAL, CLINIC 2001 - 05 - 17 33 . 89
0302758 SPALDING 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 20 ) , 64
0302759 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 994 . 05
0302760 SKINNER , BEVERLY 2001 - 05 - 17 380 . 67
0302761 SALEM PRESS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302762 SLEZAK , MARY 89 ' 78
2001 - 05 - 17 185 . 50
0302763 SAFECO , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302764 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 142 . 50
2001 - OS - 17 1 , 557 . 93
0302765 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302766 SYSTEMATIC SERVICES , INC 9 . 291 . 81
2001 - OS - 17 1 , 028 . 00
0302767 STAMM MANUFACTURING 2001 - 05 - 17 922 , 28
0302768 SARA ' S CITY WORKOUT , INC 2001 - 05 - 17
0302769 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 35 . 00
2001 - OS - 17 4 , 748 . 00
0302770 STEPHENS , JOSEPH 2001 - 05 - 17
0302771 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 05 - 17 33 . 00
0302772 SUNGARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 2001 - 05 - 17 50 . 00
0302773 SIMMONS , WALTER 11 , 937 . 93
2001 - OS - 17 100 . 00
0302774 SOUTH CAROLINA GENEALOGICAL 2001 - 05 - 17
0302775 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY 2001 - 05 - 17 140 . 00
0302776 SUNTREE PARTNERS , THE 34 . 18
2001 - OS - 17 11 , 612 . 49
0302777 SHELTON ORVAL 2001 - 05 - 17
500 . 00
0302778 S
UNNYTECH INC - FL 2001 - 05 - 17 370 . 43
0302779 SARAH ' S MEMORIAL CHAPEL INC 2001 - 05 - 17
800 . 00
JUNE 512001DA
- 12 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0302780 STALHUT , SHANNON 2001 - 05 - 17 228 . 75
0302781 TRI - SURE CORPORATION 2001 - 05 - 17 202 , 865 . 04
0302782 TREASURE COAST REFUSE CORP 2001 - 05 - 17 507 . 10
0302783 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC . , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 833 . 18
0302784 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2001 - 05 - 17 838 . 00
0302785 SMITH , TERRY L 2001 - 05 - 17 20 . 07
0302786 TEAGUE , ROSEMARY 2001 - 05 - 17 44 . 00
0302787 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2001 - 05 - 17 1 , 295 . 08
0302788 TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF 2001 - 05 - 17 200 . 00
0302789 TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL 2001 - 05 - 17 31 . 13
0302790 TEMPLE , RODNEY & CONNIE 2001 - 05 - 17 500 . 00
0302791 TINSLEY , ROBERT MD 2001 - 05 - 17 300 . 00
0302792 TESTAMERICA INC 2001 - 05 - 17 124 . 00
0302793 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2001 - 05 - 17 7 . 29
0302794 US FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2001 - 05 - 17 3 , 219 . 03
0302795 VELDE FORD , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 410 . 18
0302796 VERO BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE 2001 - 05 - 17 19 . 00
0302797 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 17 54 , 965 . 64
0302798 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 17 454 . 39
0302799 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 173 . 95
0302800 VERO LAKE ESTATES VOLUNTEER 2001 - 05 - 17 39 . 00
0302801 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 05 - 17 206 . 00
0302802 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2001 - 05 - 17 515 . 78
0302803 VERO TYPEWRITER 2001 - 05 - 17 149 . 22
0302804 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2001 - 05 - 17 130 . 00
0302805 WILLIAM THIES & SONS , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 144 . 00
0302806 WILLIAMS , BETTY R , RN 2001 - 05 - 17 88 . 00
0302807 WALKER , LAVERNE T 2001 - 05 - 17 45 . 44
0302808 WHEELER PUBLISHING , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 115 . 29
0302809 WHEATLEY , ALAN 2001 - 05 - 17 16 . 40
0302810 WRAP N ' SHIP 2001 - 05 - 17 46 . 60
0302811 WALGREEN COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 17 292 , 70
0302812 WALGREENS PHARMACY # 04619 2001 - 05 - 17 59 . 06
0302813 W W GRAINGER INC 2001 - 05 - 17 184 . 05
0302814 W C G , INC 2001 - 05 - 17 2 , 835 . 00
0302815 WODTKE , SHERRI 2001 - 05 - 17 144 . 20
0302816 WESTLAND PUBLICATIONS 2001 - 05 - 17 600 . 00
0302817 MILLER , JOSEPH 2001 - 05 - 17 506 . 24
0302818 WODTKE , RUSSELL 2001 - 05 - 17 591 . 94
0302819 LICARI , LINDA 2001 - 05 - 17 362 . 44
0302820 BAKER , RON D . 2001 - 05 - 17 522 . 00
0302821 ROYAL , THOMAS 2001 - 05 - 17 582 . 98
21365 , 222 . 42
JUNE 59 2001 -
- 13 -
w
7. C. LIST OF WARRANTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 24 , 2001 :
To: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE : MAY 247 2001
SUBJECT : APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
FROM : EDWIN M. FRY, JR. , FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136 . 06 , Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the
Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes .
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants . issued by the Clerk to
the Board , for the time period of May 18 , 2001 to May 24 , 2001 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously approved the list of Warrants as
issued by the Clerk to the Board for May 18 , 2001
through May 24 , 2001 , as recommended by staff.
JUNE 512001
U 387
- 14 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0021176 KRUCZKIEWICZ , LORIANE 2001 - 05 - 23 138 . 50
0021177 BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR 2001 - 05 - 23 115 . 38
0021178 WI SCTF 2001 - 05 - 23 150 . 00
0021179 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF 2001 - 05 - 23 167 . 00
0021180 IRS - ACS 2001 - 05 - 23 50 . 00
0021181 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 2001 - 05 - 23 664 . 73
0021182 VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC . 2001 - 05 - 23 2 , 560 . 00
0021183 INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT 2001 - 05 - 23 79 , 294 . 24
0021184 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 2001 - 05 - 23 213 . 83
0021185 NACO/ SOUTHEAST 2001 - 05 - 23 9 , 130 . 75
0021186 SALEM TRUST COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 23 401 . 94
0021187 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE 2001 - 05 - 23 132 . 46
0021188 FL SDU 2001 - 05 - 23 7 , 564 . 93
0021189 UNUM LIFE INSUANCE 2001 - 05 - 24 3 , 562 . 10
0021190 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 2001 - 05 - 24 3 , 917 . 64
0021191 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 769 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 711 . 62
0275604 BURTON , BROOK D 2000 - 01 - 06 . 00 VOID
0286084 LUONG , THUVAN THI 2000 - 07 - 13 . 00 VOID
0286391 SIMMONS , WALTER 2000 - 07 - 20
0287712 GIBSON , TONI . 00 VOID
2000 - 08 - 10 . 00 VOID
0289088 MARTIN , TAMATHA R 2000 - 09 - 07
0289757 DAVIDSON , RUFUS 00 VOID
2000 - 09 - 21 . 00 VOID
0290119 HAZZARD , ROSEMARIE 2000 - 09 - 28
0290151 BURNEY , NE SHAH . 00 VOID
0290603 CONWELL , SULTANDRA 2000 - 09 - 28 . 00 VOID
2000 - 10 - OS . 00 VOID
0290645 SEILER JR , FRANK E 2000 - 10 - OS
0291014 BROOKOVER , CARL 00 VOID
0291044 HOLCOMB , JAMES S 2000 - 10 - 12 . 00 VOID
0291060 BLACKWELL , SARA 2000 - 10 - 12 . 00 VOID
0291806 DEBULA JR , JAMES & SUSAN 2000 - 10 - 12 . 00 VOID
0291859 SHARP , JONNIE 2000 - 10 - 26 . 00 VOID
0292219 SOUTH CAROLINA GENEALOGICAL 2000 - 10- 02- 26 - 00 VOID
0292615 TYSON , KENOSHA . 00 VOID
0292641 BYERS , GARY A 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID
0293584 CUNEO , JOANNE 2000 - 11 - 09 . 00 VOID
0293604 MC CALLUM , ROBERT 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID
0293606 BILLMAN , MARC 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID
0293621 CHAMBLISS , JANETHA 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID
0293628 GEER , CYNTHIA 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID
0293634 CHAMBLISS , CLAY 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID
0293653 STUCKEY , ANNIE 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID
0294471 TAYLOR , SANDRINE 2000 - 11 - 30 . 00 VOID
0294673 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2000 - 12 - 14 . 00 VOID
0294905 VAN ZYL , KARLA 2000 - 12 - 21 . 00 VOID
0295834 HARRIS , ROSE RILEY 2000 - 12 - 21 . 00 VOID
0296006INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2001 - 01 - 11 . 00 VOID
2001 - 01 - 18 . 00 VOID
JUNE 59 2001 $ F
- 15 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0296350 J A SEXAUER INC 2001 - 01 - 25 . 00 VOID
0296558 JOHNSON , MICHELLE AND F P & L 2001 - 01 - 25 . 00 VOID
0298097 JOHNSON , MICHELLE AND F P & L 2001 - 02 - 22 . 00 VOID
0299560 JOHNSON , MICHELLE AND F P & L 2001 - 03 - 23 . 00 VOID
0299629 AMAZON . COM 2001 - 03 - 29 . 00 VOID
0299722 FILLIATE INC 2001 - 03 - 29 . 00 VOID
0300373 WRIGHT , GEORGE 2001 - 04 - 05 . 00 VOID
0301112 JOHNSON , MICHELLE AND F P & L 2001 - 04 - 20 . 00 VOID
0301149 TUMLIN , TRACY N 2001 - 04 - 20 . 00 VOID
0301527 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 2001 - 05 - 03 . 00 VOID
0301640 FRANKLIN , WAYNE F AND 2001 - 05 - 03 . 00 VOID
0301741 NORTH STAR 2001 - 05 - 03 . 00 VOID
0301929 GILLARD , HOWARD 2001 - 05 - 03 . 00 VOID
0302127 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2001 - 05 - 10 . 00 VOID
0302784 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2001 - 05 - 17 . 00 VOID
0302822 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 331 . 50
0302823 ADVANCED GARAGE DOORS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 31830 . 00
0302824 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH , 2001 - 05 - 24 11118 . 00
0302825 AT EASE ARMY NAVY 2001 - 05 - 24 396 . 00
0302826 ABS PUMPS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 138 . 00
0302827 ACTION DIESEL INJECTION 2001 - 05 - 24 414 . 90
0302828 ALL FLORIDA COFFEE & BOTTLED 2001 - 05 - 24 59 . 90
0302829 ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING 2001 - 05 - 24 94 . 25
0302830 A - 1 CONSTRUCTION CO , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 936 . 24
0302831 ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 17 . 00
0302832 A T & T 2001 - 05 - 24 63 . 98
0302833 ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP 2001 - 05 - 24 61 . 00
0302834 AMBLESIDE EDUCATIONAL PRESS 2001 - 05 - 24 15 . 50
0302835 AUTO PARTS OF VERO , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 417 . 18
0302836 ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERS CLUB 2001 - 05 - 24 403 . 05
0302837 AMERICAN REPORTING 2001 - 05 - 24 378 . 50
0302838 EALY , MARQUITA D 2001 - 05 - 24 51 . 50
0302839 ABC PRINTING CO 2001 - 05 - 24 36 . 96
0302840 ALDEN RISK MANAGEMENT 2001 - 05 - 24 9 , 994 . 95
0302841 AUTO BODY TECHNOLOGY INC 2001 - 05 - 24 214 . 00
0302842 ABSOLUTE PROTECTION TEAM 2001 - 05 - 24 779 . 89
0302843 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO 2001 - 05 - 24 498 . 00
0302844 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2001 - 05 - 24 6 , 939 . 59
0302845 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE 2001 - 05 - 24 5 . 25
0302846 BILL ' S TV SERVICE CENTER , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 114 . 95
0302847 BIO- SERVICES OF VERO , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 120 . 00
0302848 BARTON , JEFFREY K -CLERK 2001 - 05 - 24 3 , 312 . 50
0302849 BARTON , JEFFREY K 2001 - 05 - 24 11498 . 10
0302850 BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF 2001 - 05 - 24 24 . 00
0302851 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 2001 - 05 - 24 11936 . 13
0302852 BRODART CO 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 839 . 31
JUNE 59 2001 _
- 16 -
n
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER
DATE AMOUt:
0302853 BREVARD ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC 2001 - 05 - 24
0302854 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 27 .
2001 - OS - 24 527 . 9393
0302855 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2001 - 05 - 24
0302856 BELLSOUTH 32 ' 88
2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 741 . 97
0302857 BEAZER HOMES , INC 2001 - 05 - 24
0302858 BETTER COPY CENTER , A 500 , 00
2001 -
0302859 BLUE CROSS / BLUE SHIELD OF 05 - 24 220 . 08
946 , 01
0302860 BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 2001 - 05 - 24 05 - 24 19 ' 339 , 13
2001 - 05 - 24
0302861 HMG 332 , 92
0302862 BRISKIE , RON 2001 - 05 - 24 105 , 00
2001 - 05 - 24 11111 . 60
0302863 BROWN , JASON ,
0302864 BRACKETT & COMPANY 60
2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 054 . 51
0302865 BANGEL , PAUL G
2001 - 05 - 24 202 . 71 40
2001 - 05 - 24 40 . 00
0302866 BASEBALL BLUEBOOK , THE , 00
0302867 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF IRC
97 , 80
0302868 BOATHOUSE DISCOUNT MARINE INC 2001 - 05 - 24 4 , 9 22 , 26
0302869 BARROW , MARIA E 22 . 26
2001 - 05 - 24 170 . 00
0302870 BREVARD BUILDERS GROUP INC
2001 - 05 - 24 5 , 8
0302871 BUDGET NOTARY SERVICES 69 , 00
2001 - 05 - 24
0302872 BELLSOUTH 77 , 600
2001 - 05 - 24
0302873 CLASSIC AWARDS 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 692 , 30
0302874 CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL 5 - 24 21 , 0
0302875 COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR , INC 2001 - 05 - 2414 , 88
0302876 COMMUNICATIONS INT ' L INC 114 . 88
0302877 CROOM CONSTRUCTION CO 2001 - 05 - 24 5 , 463 . 00
2001 - OS - 24
0302878 CHEMSEARCH 500 , 00
141 * 84
0302879 CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC 2001 - 05 - 24 2001 - 05 - 24 322 . 55 322 , 55
0302880 CATHOLIC CHARITIES
0302881 COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF 2001 - 05 - 24 01 - 05 - 24
5 , 517 . 10
5 . 97
0302882 CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA 2001 - 05 - 24 48 . 45 3 , 078 , 45
0302883 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 107 , 38
2001 - 05 - 24 33 . 57
0302884 CINDY ' S PET CENTER , INC 33 , 57
0302885 CASH CONTROL SYSTEMS , INC
2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 200
0302886 CLIFFORD , MIKE , 00
0302887 CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT 2001 - 05 - 24 2001 - 05 - 24 200 . 00
0302888 CIT GROUP , THE 48 , 75
0302889 CSR AMERICA , INC . 2001 - 05 - 24 615 , 32
0302890 CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND 2001 - 05 - 24
2001 - 05 - 24 403 . 92
0302891 COUNTRY WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC , 2001 - 05 - 24 142 . 50
0302892 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 91 . 65
0302893 COLUMBIA PROPANE 2001 - 05 - 24 369 . 38
0302894 COASTAL TITLE SERVICES INC 2001 - 05 - 24 411 , 09
2001 - 05 - 24
08
0302895 CALLAWAY GOLF BALL CO 2001 - 05 - 24 167 . 41 67 , 41
0302896 CINGULAR WIRELESS
2001 - 05 - 24
0302897 CENTRAL AV INC . / MCSI 15 , 38
0302898 COX , BRIANNA 2001 - OS - 24 4 , 688 . 00
2001 - 05 - 24 19 , 31
JUNE 59 2001
- 17 -
N
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0302899 CLARKS , ELIZABETH 2001 - 05 - 24 135 . 00
0302900 DAVES SPORTING GOODS 2001 - 05 - 24 257 . 00
0302901 DEEP SIX DIVE SHOP , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 350 . 00
0302902 DELTA SUPPLY CO 2001 - 05 - 24 675 . 00
0302903 DEMCO INC 2001 - 05 - 24 24 . 40
0302904 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 2001 - 05 - 24 21745 . 99
0302905 DEPENDABLE DODGE , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 006 . 45
0302906 DICKERSON - FLORIDA , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 208 . 60
0302907 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 05 - 24 821 . 89
0302908 DIGGS , JEFFREY P 2001 - 05 - 24 180 . 29
0302909 DAVIDSON TITLES , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 200 . 83
0302910 DADE PAPER COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 24 203 . 15
0302911 DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC 2001 - 05 - 24 71 . 15
0302912 DOCTORS ' CLINIC 2001 - 05 - 24 257 . 00
0302913 E G P INC 2001 - 05 - 24 769 . 00
0302914 EDLUND & DRITENBAS 2001 - 05 - 24 7 , 882 . 87
0302915 EXPEDITER INC , THE 2001 - 05 - 24 91 . 89
0302916 ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 471 . 00
0302917 EVERGLADES FARM 2001 - 05 - 24 66 . 66
0302918 FEDEX 2001 - 05 - 24 73 . 82
0302919 FELLSMERE , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 24 58 . 53
0302920 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2001 - 05 - 24 60 . 44
0302921 FLORIDA COCA- COLA BOTTLING CO 2001 - 05 - 24 366 . 75
0302922 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 24 45 , 174 . 49
0302923 FLORIDA WATER RESOURCES 2001 - 05 - 24 394 . 30
0302924 FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICATIONS 2001 - 05 - 24 12 . 95
0302925 FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF 2001 - 05 - 24 57 . 32
0302926 FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 116 . 36
0302927 FLINN , SHEILA I 2001 - 05 - 24 325 . 50
0302928 FALZONE , KATHY 2001 - 05 - 24 104 . 28
0302929 FALZONE , CHRISTOPHER 2001 - 05 - 24 77 . 24
0302930 FATHER & SON CARPET , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 41314 . 00
0302931 FLORIDA ANIMAL LEAGUE 2001 - 05 - 24 115 . 00
0302932 FLOYD MD , IRA 2001 - 05 - 24 88 . 00
0302933 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK 2001 - 05 - 24 372 . 12
0302934 FLORIDA CLINICAL PRACTICE 2001 - 05 - 24 48 . 00
0302935 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 2001 - 05 - 24 39 . 99
0302936 FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC 2001 - 05 - 24 3 , 500 . 00
0302937 FUCHS , SUSAN 2001 - 05 - 24 24 . 00
0302938 FIRTH , RYAN 2001 - 05 - 24 92 . 70
0302939 FORT PIERCE , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 24 35 . 00
0302940 GALE GROUP , THE 2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 022 . 00
0302941 GENE ' S AUTO GLASS 2001 - 05 - 24 275 . 00
0302942 GLIDDEN COMPANY , THE 2001 - 05 - 24 75 . 15
0302943 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 148 . 58
0302944 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 2001 - 05 - 24 58 . 40
JUNE 59 2001
- 18 -
x
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0302945 GINN , CAROLINE D 2001 - 05 - 24 486 . 54
0302946 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE 2001 - 05 - 24 11 , 444 . 20
0302947 GONZALEZ , PATRICK MD 2001 - 05 - 24 650 . 00
0302948 GOULD , COOKSEY , FENNELL , O ' NEILL 2001 - 05 - 24 26 , 169 . 00
0302949 GORMAN , MINDY 2001 - 05 - 24 38 . 62
0302950 GREEN , AL 2001 - 05 - 24 20 . 60
0302951 H W WILSON CO 2001 - 05 - 24 109 . 20
0302952 HAMMOND & SMITH , P A 2001 - 05 - 24 10 , 450 . 00
0302953 HARRIS SANITATION , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 430 . 52
0302954 HELSETH MACHINE AND MARINE 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 440 . 00
0302955 HIGHSMITH , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 282 , 87
0302956 HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES 2001 - 05 - 24 390 . 99
0302957 HACH COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 523 . 20
0302958 HERCULES INC 2001 - 05 - 24 3 , 528 . 00
0302959 HILL MANUFACTURING 2001 - 05 - 24 373 . 74
0302960 HORIZON NURSERY 2001 - 05 - 24 255 . 00
0302961 HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL 2001 - 05 - 24 30 . 00
0302962 HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER 2001 - 05 - 24 85 . 00
0302963 HYATT REGENCY WESTSHORE HOTEL 2001 - 05 - 24 89 . 00
0302964 HOLIDAY INN SUNSPREE RESORT 2001 - 05 - 24 198 . 00
0302965 HANSEN , SUSAN 2001 - 05 - 24 172 , 84
0302966 HEALTHSOUTH HOLDINGS 2001 - 05 - 24 72 . 00
0302967 HARRIS , GREGORY PHD CVE 2001 - 05 - 24 785 . 40
0302968 HERMAN , JOEL V 2001 - 05 - 24 491 . 16
0302969 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 05 - 24 125 . 00
0302970 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 380 . 00
0302971 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 308 . 50
0302972 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITY 2001 - 05 - 24 69 . 32
0302973 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 2001 - 05 - 24 110 . 49
0302974 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2001 - 05 - 24 4 , 251 . 00
0302975 INTER - TEL TECHNOLOGIES INC 2001 - 05 - 24 180 . 00
0302976 IRC EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE - 2001 - 05 - 24 126 , 154 . 44
0302977 IMI - NET , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 607 . 00
0302978 INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 2001 - 05 - 24 42 . 13
0302979 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMIT 2001 - 05 - 24 21 . 20
0302980 INDIAN RIVER HAND 2001 - 05 - 24 99 . 90
0302981 IMAGEAMERICA 2001 - 05 - 24 15 , 832 . 00
0302982 JUDICIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 2001 - 05 - 24 409 . 00
0302983 JOHN LLOYD BUILDERS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 8 , 607 . 80
0302984 JETSON TV AUDIO , STERO & 2001 - 05 - 24 599 . 97
0302985 JONES III , MACK 2001 - 05 - 24 61 . 80
0302986 JEWETT ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC 2001 - 05 - 24 440 . 10
0302987 JEFFERSON , CHRISTOPHER A 2001 - 05 - 24 141 . 80
0302988 JOHN H DEAN ARCHITECT AND 2001 - 05 - 24 20 , 000 . 00
0302989 JACOBS , JEREMY 2001 - 05 - 24 113 . 30
0302990 JUDAH , HUSTON 2001 - 05 - 24 61 . 80
JUNE 59 2001 r iju ' 2
- 19 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER
DATE AMOUNT
0302991 JOHNSON , MICHELLE AND F P & L 2001 - 05 - 24 76 . 00
0302992 JLT INSURANCE SERVICES 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 890 . 00
0302993 JOHNSON , ANSELMO , MURDOCH , 2001 - 05 - 24 14 , 224 . 58
0302994 JUSTUS , DANIELLE 2001 - 05 - 24 99 . 13
0302995 JANNACH PROPERTIES LTD 2001 - 05 - 24 3 , 900 . 00
0302996 JONES CHEMICALS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 944 . 89
0302997 KOUNS , DARLENE 2001 - 05 - 24 82 . 40
0302998 KELLER , JENAE 2001 - 05 - 24 38 . 62
0302999 KOHLER , JOHN 2001 - 05 - 24 551 . 50
0303000 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC . 2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 444 . 17
0303001 L B SMITH , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 340 . 10
0303002 LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2001 - 05 - 24 210 . 00
0303003 LFI VERO BEACH , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 367 . 60
0303004 LESCO , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 109 . 99
0303005 LOWE ' S COMPANIES , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 21 . 33
0303006 LUNA , JUVENAL 2001 - 05 - 24 301 . 27
0303007 LEDLOW , ALYSSA 2001 - 05 - 24
0303008 LOCKE , LAUREN 75 . 96
2001 - 05 - 24 38 . 62
0303009 MACMILLAN OIL COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 24 113 . 44
0303010 MAXWELL PLUMBING , INC 2001 - 05 - 24
0303011 MID COAST TIRE SERVICE , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 77 . 40
42 . 50
0303012 MAGANA , IGNACIO M D
2001 - 05 - 24 75 . 00
0303013 MARTIN ' S LAMAR UNIFORMS 2001 - 05 - 24
0303014 MATTHEW BENDER & CO , INC 624 . 08
2001 - OS - 24 57 . 15
0303015 MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES , INC 2001 - 05 - 24
0303016 MCMASTER- CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 2001 - 05 - 24 103 . 50
386 . 50
0303017 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
2001 - 05 - 24 59 . 95
0303018 MARC INDUSTRIES 2001 - 05 - 24
0303019 M E SHARPE ? INC165 . 05
2001 - 05 - 24 380 . 5 ,;
0303020 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 05 - 24
0303021 MAX DAVIS ASSOCIATES INC 1 , 000 . 0 *
0303022 MORTON SALT 2001 - 05 - 24 185 . 0 : .
2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 193 .
0303023 MAPLOGIC CORPORATION 0
2001 - 05 - 24 914 . 000
0303024 MALLAMS , JOHN H , PHD
2001 - 05 - 24 73 . 15
0303025 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION
2001 - 05 - 24 18 . 00
0303026 MCCARTHY MD , JOHN
2001 - 05 - 24 650 . 0
0303027 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
0303028 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO 2001 - 05 - 24 71 . 066
2001 - 05 - 24 23 . 70
0303029 NOEL , THOMAS
2001 - 05 - 24 74 . 67
0303030 NATIONAL DIAMOND
4303031 NGZ 2001 - OS - 24 630 . 00
0303032 NEUROLOGY ASSOCIATES 2001 - 05 - 24 216 . 00
2001 - 05 - 24 203 . 00
0303033 ON IT ' S WAY
0303034 OFFICE DEPOT , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 241 . 90
2001 - 05 - 24 286 . 06
0303035 ORLANDO , KAREN M
2001 - 05 - 24 178 . 50
0303036 ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO
2001 - OS - 24 1 , 113 . 75
JUNE 59 2001 pr e
- 20 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER
DATE AMOUNT
0303037 ONE CALL COMPREHENSIVE CARE 2001 - 05 - 24 148 . 85
0303038 PARKS RENTAL INC 2001 - 05 - 24 143 . 90
0303039 PETTY CASH 2001 - 05 - 24 25 , 78
0303040 PROFESSIONAL TITLE OF INDIAN 2001 - 05 - 24 203 . 55
0303041 PORT CONSOLIDATED 2001 - 05 - 24 11 , 137 . 55
0303042 PERCONTI DATA SYSTEMS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 5 . 00
0303043 POSTMASTER 2001 - 05 - 24 935 . 96
0303044 PERLICK , PETER 2001 - 05 - 24 500 . 00
0303045 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 2001 - 05 - 24 54 . 22
0303046 PMX MEDICAL 2001 - 05 - 24 175 . 50
0303047 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 2001 - 05 - 24 14 , 000 . 00
0303048 PARKER , DEBBIE 2001 - 05 - 24 200 . 85
0303049 PAYNE , JAMES 2001 - 05 - 24 131 . 50
0303050 P B S & J ANALYTICAL SERVICES 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 825 . 00
0303051 PRESSURE PRO 2001 - 05 - 24 159 . 01
0303052 PENA , JORGE 2001 - 05 - 24 103 . 00
0303053 PC WEATHER PRODUCTS 2001 - 05 - 24 315 . 00
0303054 QUALITY BOOKS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 157 . 53
0303055 PILKINGTON COMPETITION EQUIP 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 045 . 00
0303056 RADIOSHACK 2001 - 05 - 24 828 , 87
0303057 RECORDED BOOKS , LLC 2001 - 05 - 24 296 . 00
0303058 R & G SOD FARMS 2001 - 05 - 24
0303059 RELIABLE POLY JOHN SERVICES 2001 - 05 - 24 210 . 00
250 . 00
0303060 RAY TECH ENTERPRISES INC
2001 - 05 - 24 7 , 430 . 00
0303061 RAPP , PAMELA 2001 - 05 - 24
0303062 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING 2001 - 05 - 24 12 . 00
0303063 ROYAL , THOMAS 2 , 506 . 17
2001 - 05 - 24 185 . 02
0303064 RASMUSSEN , KARA
2001 - 05 - 24 82 . 40
0303065 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
2001 - 05 - 24 15 . 77
0303066 R S MEDICAL
0303067 ROCKWOOD CORPORATION , THE 2001 - 05 - 24 385 . 00
2001 - 05 - 24 31 . 10
0303068 SCOTT ' S SPORTING GOODS
2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 764 . 99
0303069 SEWELL HARDWARE CO , INC
2001 - 05 - 24 492 . 53
0303070 SOUTHARD , TERRY
2001 - 05 - 24 201 . 00
0303071 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING ,
0303072 REXEL SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2001 - 05 - 24 344 . 40
257 . 15
0303073 ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE , INC 2001 - 05 - 24
0303074 STANDARD & POOR ' S 503 . 92
0303075 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO 2001 - 05 - 24- 05 - 24 2 , 496 . 84
0303076 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2001 - 05 - 24 69 . 72
0303077 SERVICE REFRIGERATION CO , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 465 . 30
0303078 SUN TELEPHONE , INC 82 . 50
0303079 SAFESPACE INC 2001 - 05 - 24 2001 - 05 - 24 89 . 85
0303080 SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES INC 2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 772 43
0303081 SAM ' S CLUB 46 . 91
0303082 SALEM PRESS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 25 . 44
2001 - 05 - 24 84 , 79
JUNE 59 2001 1 ' u
- 21 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0303083 SKAGGS , PAUL MD 2001 - 05 - 24 8 . 00
0303084 SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 63 . 80
0303085 SAWMILL RIDGE TRUCKING CO 2001 - 05 - 24 4 , 297 . 20
0303086 SUPERIOR PRINTING 2001 - 05 - 24 48 . 60
0303087 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 311 . 12
0303088 SEBASTIAN , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 24 8 , 187 . 08
0303089 SOUTHERN LOCK AND SUPPLY CO 2001 - 05 - 24 321 . 73
0303090 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 2001 - 05 - 24 81 . 80
0303091 SEELEY , SANDRA 2001 - 05 - 24 36 . 20
0303092 SUMMERLIN SEVEN SEAS INC 2001 - 05 - 24 4 , 760 . 00
0303093 SPRINGSTEAD , R W MD 2001 - 05 - 24 154 . 00
0303094 STERICYCLE INC 2001 - 05 - 24 167 . 70
0303095 SUNSHINE TRAFFIC SALES INC 2001 - 05 - 24 377 . 75
0303096 SUNNYTECH INC - FL 2001 - 05 - 24 178 . 14
0303097 SEARCY , DENNEY , SCAROLA , 2001 - 05 - 24 194 . 03
0303098 SCOTT ' S TREE SERVICE INC 2001 - 05 - 24 225 . 00
0303099 STALHUT , SHANNON 2001 - 05 - 24 266 . 25
0303100 TEN- 8 FIRE EQUIPMENT , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 8 , 489 . 35
0303101 THOMPSON , TERRY B 2001 - 05 - 24 101 . 70
0303102 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING 2001 - 05 - 24 19 , 713 . 50
0303103 TESNOW , RONALD L 2001 - 05 - 24 481 . 88
0303104 TALLMAN , RICHARD JAMES 2001 - 05 - 24 491 . 16
0303105 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN 2001 - 05 - 24 763 . 00
0303106 TRANSIT AIR CONDITIONING 2001 - 05 - 24 234 . 07
0303107 THOMAS REGISTER OF AMERICAN 2001 - 05 - 24 129 . 00
0303108 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL CORP 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 744 . 00
0303109 TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 2001 - 05 - 24 491 . 26
0303110 THYSSEN MIAMI ELEVATOR 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 958 . 00
0303111 UTILITY SERVICE CO , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 31750 . 00
0303112 U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2001 - 05 - 24 141 , 660 . 62
0303113 USA BLUEBOOK 2001 - 05 - 24 19 . 18
0303114 URGENT CARE WEST 2001 - 05 - 24 97 . 00
0303115 UNIPSYCH BENEFITS OF FL , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 154 . 60
0303116 U S MICROMAP CORP 2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 500 . 00
0303117 VELDE FORD , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 157 . 13
0303118 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 24 2 , 276 . 73
0303119 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2001 - 05 - 24 118 . 33
0303120 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 102 . 45
0303121 VERO MARINE CENTER , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 48 , 42
0303122 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2001 - 05 - 24 75 . 00
0303123 VERO BEARING & BOLT 2001 - 05 - 24 97 , 60
0303124 VERO BEACH POLO L . L . C . 2001 - 05 - 24 31891 . 77
0303125 VRCJ LLC 2001 - 05 - 24 500 . 00
0303126 WAL - MART STORES , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 361 . 69
0303127 WALSH , LYNN 2001 - 05 - 24 64 . 00
0303128 WOODY ' S PRINTING 2001 - 05 - 24 555 . 99
JUNE 59 2001
- 22 -
17 FIRM
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0303129 WILLHOFF , PATSY 2001 - 05 - 24 130 . 00
0303130 WILLIAM THIES & SONS , INC 2001 - 05 - 24 216 . 00
0303131 WATER TREATMENT & CONTROLS CO 2001 - 05 - 24 603 . 56
0303132 WILLIAMS , BETTY R , RN 2001 - 05 - 24 66 . 00
0303133 WABASSO GOLF 2001 - 05 - 24 300 . 00
0303134 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR 2001 - 05 - 24 269 . 75
0303135 WOLF ROOFING & SIDING 2001 - 05 - 24 3 , 244 . 00
0303136 WOLAVER , JOHN 2001 - 05 - 24 500 . 00
0303137 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 2001 - 05 - 24 57 . 26
0303138 REDDIE , BARRIS 2001 - 05 - 24 290 . 96
0303139 LICARI , LINDA 2001 - 05 - 24 258 . 86
0303140 HICKS , FLORA 2001 - 05 - 24 23 . 09
0303141 BURGOON BERGER CONST CO 2001 - 05 - 24 51 . 61
0303142 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 05 - 24 86 . 22
0303143 SKISCIM , MICHAEL J JR 2001 - 05 - 24 36 . 78
0303144 FREEMAN , BRENDA 2001 - 05 - 24 40 . 29
0303145 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2001 - 05 - 24 73 . 59
0303146 BAER , JOHN F JR 2001 - 05 - 24 48 . 63
0303147 PURDY , GARY D 2001 - 05 - 24 43 . 12
0303148 CRAWFORD , STANLEY 2001 - 05 - 24 63 . 49
0303149 MGB CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 05 - 24 39 . 50
0303150 BOND , MARIE 2001 - 05 - 24 16 . 95
0303151 WULLENWEBER , JEANNE 2001 - 05 - 24 85 . 47
0303152 GROSS , ANTHONY 2001 - 05 - 24 86 . 46
0303153 MLEKO , MICHAEL 2001 - 05 - 24 9 . 78
0303154 RCL DEVELOPMENT INC 2001 - 05 - 24 53 . 50
0303155 LEACH , ROBERT AND 2001 - 05 - 24 48 . 95
0303156 TRACKER , J RUSSELL 2001 - 05 - 24 87 . 65
0303157 HENDRICKS , LESLIE M 2001 - 05 - 24 24 . 51
0303158 PENNINGTON , MEREL B 2001 - 05 - 24 33 . 04
0303159 PAKEBUSCH , PAUL AND 2001 - 05 - 24 44 . 14
0303160 STAFFORD , ANITA 2001 - 05 - 24 74 . 75
0303161 AR PATS DRY CLEANERS 2001 - 05 - 24 14 . 17
0303162 KUHNER , ALBERT L 2001 - 05 - 24 33 . 92
0303163 KELLEHER , FRED 2001 - 05 - 24 80 . 50
0303164 KOLB , CYNTHIA A 2001 - 05 - 24 51 . 50
0303165 BELL , CHESTINE 2001 - 05 - 24 74 . 73
0303166 0 LEAKY , DONALD P 2001 - 05 - 24 82 . 91
0303167 MACCARIO , COURTNEY 2001 - 05 - 24 27 . 04
0303168 SMITH , ELSON R III 2001 - 05 - 24 25 . 30
0303169 BAKER , ROBERT C 2001 - 05 - 24 29 . 33
0303170 KARLSSON , KAY 2001 - 05 - 24 41 . 23
0303171 HILL , GEORGIA A 2001 - 05 - 24 37 . 69
0303172 FOX , BROOKE A 2001 - 05 - 24 60 . 59
0303173 DAVIS , NOREEN 2001 - 05 - 24 65 . 49
0303174 MAXWELL , HENRY 2001 - 05 - 24 78 . 19
JUNE 59 2001 ,
- 23 -
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0303175 DION , ROBERT H 2001 - 05 - 24 33 . 13
0303176 PASSANESI , KIM 2001 - 05 - 24 13 . 23
0303177 THOMAS , LETTICIA 2001 - 05 - 24 26 . 77
0303178 POWERS , JULIE 2001 - 05 - 24 52 . 66
0303179 FLYNT , DAVID J 2001 - 05 - 24 34 . 32
0303180 WERNICKI , JO ANNE 2001 - 05 - 24 41 . 50
0303181 MAHONEY , DENEEN 2001 - 05 - 24 77 . 94
0303182 MC DONALD , GLENN AND 2001 - 05 - 24 17 . 67
0303183 LEIDNER , RONALD 2001 - 05 - 24 282 . 42
0303184 ZEREGA , JOSEPH 2001 - 05 - 24 36 . 67
0303185 RYAN , ARTHUR , G 2001 - 05 - 24 65 . 64
0303186 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES 2001 - 05 - 24 264 . 97
0303187 VICTORY BAPTIST CHURCH 2001 - 05 - 24 41 . 40
0303188 MOTTA , LESLIE 2001 - 05 - 24 85 . 28
0303189 WHITAKER , JON M 2001 - 05 - 24 51 . 77
0303190 PENLY , RICHARD 2001 - 05 - 24 77 . 53
0303191 TERRILL , DAVID 2001 - 05 - 24 45 . 89
0303192 DIXON , BONNIE 2001 - 05 - 24 29 . 95
0303193 FILEWICH , MICHAEL D 2001 - 05 - 24 41 . 92
0303194 KNIGHT , PATTI 2001 - 05 - 24 67 . 18
0303195 RAY , LOIS JACKSON 2001 - 05 - 24 37 . 15
0303196 PEREIRA ? CLEMAN MONRON 2001 - 05 - 24 25 . 46
0303197 PRESLEY , ROBERT K 2001 - 05 - 24 1 . 07
0303198 RICCARDI III , ALBERT 2001 - 05 - 24 32 . 01
0303199 PLOURDE , CHRISTOPHER 2001 - 05 - 24 187 . 75
0303200 LINCOLN PROPERTY CO 2001 - 05 - 24 1 , 042 . 49
0303201 WHITE , MARTIN 2001 - 05 - 24 48 . 63
0303202 JACKSON , OLLIE B 2001 - 05 - 24 68 . 62
0303203 YOUNG , SAMUEL R 2001 - 05 - 24 51 . 21
0303204 DEVINE , DON 2001 - 05 - 24 76 . 72
0303205 CARTER , MARY ALICE 2001 - 05 - 24 32 . 08
0303206 BURGOON BERGER CONST CO 2001 - 05 - 24 39 . 61
0303207 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC 2001 - 05 - 24 80 . 36
0303208 MGB CONSTRUCTION 2001 - 05 - 24 83 . 85
0303209 KASUNIC , JOSEPH J 2001 - 05 - 24 75 . 88
0303210 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 2001 - 05 - 24 332 . 02
0303211 GRAY , GEORGE R 2001 - 05 - 24 76 . 92
0303212 BROWN , THELMA 2001 - 05 - 24 26 . 88
0303213 HINES , RANDY 2001 - 05 - 24 26 . 33
0303214 KLIMAS , HARRY A 2001 - 05 - 24 55 . 15
0303215 COMPERE , NAZILIA 2001 - 05 - 24 37 . 13
0303216 BATES , J ROBERT AND 2001 - 05 - 24 56 . 26
0303217 NORMAN , DAVID M 2001 - 05 - 24 70 . 61
0303218 SADDER , JUDITH L 2001 - 05 - 24 31 . 40
0303219 RICHARDSON , MARK B 2001 - 05 - 24 7 . 33
0303220 ROMO , GONZALO 2001 - 05 - 24 33 . 48
JUNE 59 2001 t 0� r%
- 24 -
i
4
t
{
L
t
F
0
F
f
a
r
E
r:
r
t
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0303221 DEL VECCHIO , VICKIE 2001 - 05 - 24 6 . 92 l
0303222 FARR , CARL 2001 - 05 - 24 35 . 56
0303223 COLLEY , SUZAN M 2001 - 05 - 24 30 . 96
0303224 SEA OAKS INVESTMENT LTD 2001 - 05 - 24 10 . 05
0303225 POLLARD , SHANNON 2001 - 05 - 24 42 . 95 p
0303226 SIMES CONSTRUCTION CO INC 2001 - 05 - 24 26 . 28
0303227 RHOADES , RICHARD J 2001 - 05 - 24 41 . 50 f
0303228 HAYES , MARGUERITA 2001 - 05 - 24 24 . 88
0303229 LADNER , RICHARD 2001 - 05 - 24 25 . 23
0303230 FINK , JULIE 2001 - 05 - 24 53 . 22 t
0303231 PARSONS , SHANNON 2001 - 05 - 24 19 . 97 ##
0303232 ISBELL , TAMMY L 2001 - 05 - 24 7 . 02 k
0303233 DENNIS , ADAM 2001 - 05 - 24 91 . 22
0303234 LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION INC 2001 - 05 - 24 115 . 15
0303235 NAIMAISHA GROUP 2001 - 05 - 24 328 . 94
0303236 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES 2001 - 05 - 24 31 . 03
0303237 NORMAN , SHARON 2001 - 05 - 24 13 . 43
0303238 FRIES , RAYMOND L 2001 - 05 - 24 26 . 46
0303239 WINGATE , RICHARD 2001 - 05 - 24 8 . 50
0303240 MC COLLOM , GERRYWALT D 2001 - 05 - 24 29 . 07
0303241 PAISLEY , ALICIA 2001 - 05 - 24 14 . 22
0303242 WEITZ CO , THE 2001 - 05 - 24 345 . 00
0303243 BUICH , MARILYN 2001 - 05 - 24 84 . 35
0303244 MILESTONE INDUSTRIES INC 2001 - 05 - 24 327 . 79
0303245 RAMOS , GLORIA 2001 - 05 - 24 28 . 13
0303246 VLM ASSOCIATES LLC 2001 - 05 - 24 395 . 84
0303247 WILEY , PAMELA 2001 - 05 - 24 8 . 51
0303248 CRAWFORD , DONALD D 2001 - 05 - 24 43 . 82
0303249 DAVIS , RUTH 2001 - 05 - 24 20 . 62
0303250 STEPHENS , DANIEL P 2001 - 05 - 24 27 . 41
0303251 CHAMBLISS , BILLIE 2001 - 05 - 24 42 . 95
845 , 723 . 13
JUNE 59 2001 u i ' li j u
- 25 -
7. D. STATE REVENUE SHARING APPLICATION FOR 200142 - SHERIFF -
EMERGENCYSER VICESDEPARTMENT (FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
REVEN( E)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 17 , 2001 :
TO : Board of County Commissioners
DATE : May 17, 2001
SUBJECT : State Revenue Sharing Application
FROM : Ed Fry, Finance Director
Background Information
Attached to this memorandum is the State Revenue Sharing application that must be filled in, signed,
and returned to the State by June 30, 2001 . This application must be completed and filed on a timely
basis in order for the County to receive State Revenue Sharing funds . For the 2000 fiscal year, the
County received $2, 756,913 . 81 in State Revenue Sharing funds . As of May 17, 2001 , the County
has received $ 1 ,314, 838 . 49.
The Sheriff and the Director of the Department of Emergency Services have completed and signed
the appropriate sections of the application. The County has complied with all of the requirements
set forth in the application and has filed all reports that are required to be filed with the State . All
sections of the application have been completed and the application has been signed by the Chief
Fiscal Officer.
Requested Action
Request the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the
State Revenue Sharing application.
JUNE 59 2001 n 6
9
- 26 -
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously authorized the Chairman to sign
the State Revenue Sharing application , as
recommended by staff.
COPY OF APPLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7. E. LOCAL MITIGATIONSTRATEGYPLAN - MODIFICATION OFPROJECTS -
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL - DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITYAFFAIRS GRANT (FLORIDA FRONT PORCH LVITIA TIVE
COMMUNITY DESIGNATION - GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 25 , 2001 :
TO : Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH : Douglas Wright, Director
Department of Emergency ervices
FROM : Nathan McCollum, Emergency Management Coordinator
Department of Emergency Services
DATE : May 25 , 2001
SUBJECT : Modification of Projects for the Local Mitigation Strategy Plan
On July 14 , 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved an inter-local agreement between Indian
River County and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for the development of a Local Mitigation
Strategy Plan . The plan was completed and approved by the Board on November 16, 1999, along with
instructions for certain mitigation projects .
JUNE 59 2001 t 00
- 27 -
Included in the mitigation projects was the development of a shelter retrofit report for Indian River County .
This project is no longer needed because the State ofFlorida Department of Community Affairs has completed
the shelter retrofit report for every county in Florida. The County ' s Local Mitigation Strategy Group met on
May 23 , 2001 , to discuss another appropriate project which is consistent with the goals ofthe Local Mitigation
Strategy Plan. By unanimous vote, the group selected the Florida Front Porch Initiative Community
Designation program as an appropriate mitigation project . This program allows residents to define and resolve
mitigation efforts through community involvement . Florida Front Porch designation will enhance our ability
to obtain future mitigation grants, as well as funding for other county projects.
The funding for the Florida Front Porch application is contained within the LMS grant provided by the
Department of Community Affairs . No county funds will be used for this application.
RECOMMENDATION :
Staff recommends approval ofthe modification request to eliminate the shelter retrofit program from the Local
Mitigation Strategy projects plan and substitute with the Florida Front Porch Initiative Community Designation
project . Staff further recommends Board authorization to complete and submit the application for the Florida
Front Porch designation.
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . State of Florida Overview of the Florida Front Porch Project
Commissioner Stanbridge noted that this is a wonderful opportunity for the Gifford
community and asked for approval of an endorsement letter .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board
unanimously approved the modification request to
eliminate the shelter retrofit program from the Local
Mitigation Strategy projects plan and substitute with
the Florida Front Porch Initiative Community
Designation project and to complete and submit the
application for the Florida Front Porch designation ,
as recommended by staff, and approved the
endorsement letter written by Vice Chairman
Stanbridge .
JUNE 512001 PG
- 28 -
COPY OF APPLICATION WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. F. SURPLUS VEHICLE REINSTATEMENT AS A FIXED ASSET - REINSTATE
VEHICLE 4243 AND SURPLUS VEHICLE #145A
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 23 , 2001 :
To : The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Date : May 239 2001
Thru : James E. Chandler, County Administrator /
From : Thomas W . Frame, General Services Director 4 vl(t) . j"L � «`
Subject: Surplus Vehicle Reinstatement as a Fixed Asset (Building & Grounds)
BACKGROUND :
This past February Building and Grounds received shipment of a new flatbed truck that is used
extensively by the grounds crew . The truck (#243 , Fixed Asset # 16660) it was to replace was
placed on the excess property list and was subsequently approved as surplus property by the
Board on May 8 , 2001 . However between the time the truck was placed in the excess property
and the new truck was delivered, an additional flat-bed vehicle (# 145A, Fixed Asset #012565 )
actually deteriorated to a condition worse than the vehicle (#243 ) that was approved into surplus .
Since the truck (#243 ) that was supposed to be disposed of is in better condition than the other
previously existing flatbed truck ( 145A) , it would be more desirable to have flatbed truck ( #243 )
reinstated as a fixed asset and have truck (# 145A) declared surplus .
RECOMENDATION :
Staff recommends that vehicle #243 ( fixed asset # 16660) previously declared surplus on May 8 ,
2001 , be reinstated as a fixed asset and vehicle # 145A ( fixed asset #012565 ) be declared surplus .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams .
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously approved reinstating as a fixed
asset Vehicle # 243 (Fixed Asset # 16660 ) and
declared surplus Vehicle 4145A (Fixed Asset
# 012565 ) , as recommended by staff.
JUNE 59 2001
G gym. 0
- 29 -
7. G. LIBRARY EXPANSION - RENTAL OF STORAGE SPACE AT US#1 TRADE
CENTER FROM JANNACH PROPERTIES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 23 , 2001 :
Date : May 23 , 2001
To : The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
From : Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director
Subject: Rental of Storage Space for Library Expansion
BACKGROUND :
With the construction of the additions to the two libraries , temporary storage is needed to move
various materials and furnishings that would otherwise be in the way. The storage is needed for
approximately 12 months . The purchasing staff undertook search for affordable storage . Five
thousand square feet was deemed to be the minimum space to accommodate the needs of both
libraries. Prices were sought for both air-conditioned space and non air-conditioned space.
Contact was made with numerous providers and the prices varied depending on the area, the term
and whether the space was air-conditioned .
Locations were contacted from Sebastian to Vero Beach . Prices for air-conditioned spaced
ranged from $6 . 00 to $ 8 . 00 per square foot. While air-conditioned space was desirable, the price
for that space was not. We finally found a space ( 7 , 800 sq . ft. ) in the U. S . 1 Trade Center,
Gifford, available on a monthly basis that could be obtained through the issuance of a purchase
order. The price annualized was 53 . 00 per square foot, or $ 1 , 950 per month. This is by far the
lowest in cost and the best terms considering it would be rented on a month to month basis .
Other sites among others explored include the old Heilig-Meyers warehouse on Old Dixie
Highway in Vero Beach and the former Beall ' s Outlet in Sebastian. The location of the U . S . 1
Trade Center is reasonably convenient to both libraries since it was on the north side of the Vero
area.
RECOMENDATION :
Based on the pricing discovered by the staff at Purchasing, we could locate no better price . It is
doubted that a sealed bid in this instance would yield a more compete price especially
considering the space needed and the desirability of month to month rent. Staff would
recommend that the Board authorize the leasing of 7 , 800 square feet of space in the U. S . 1 Trade
Center from Jannach Properties Ltd . on a month-to- month basis through a purchase order at a
price not to exceed $ 1 , 950 per month .
JUNE 59 2001 $ ,� PG i
- 30 -
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously authorized the leasing of 7 , 800
square feet of space in the U . S . # 1 Trade Center from
Jannach Properties , Ltd . on a month -to-month basis
through a purchase order at a price not to exceed
S 1 , 950 per month, as recommended by staff.
7. H. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LA W ENFORCEMENT GRANTS - (I ) MULTI
A GENCY DR UG ENFORCEMENT UNIT LMA C E L (2) PREVENT
LSUBSTANCEABUSE COUNCILIAND (3) SUBSTANCEABUSE COUNCIL OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - FY 2001 - 02 ANTI-DR UG AB USE GRANT
FUNDING - SHERIFF
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 29 , 2001 :
TO : Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE : May 29, 2001
SUBJECT : FISCAL YEAR 2001 /2002
ANTI-DRUG ABUSE GRANT FUNDING
THROUGH : Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM : Jason E . Brown
Budget Manager
BACKGROUND
For the past eleven fiscal years , Indian River County has been allocated grant funds from the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement ( formerly the Florida Department of Community Affairs) to fund
local anti-drug abuse programs . The Board has funded the following programs the past two years :
JUNE 59 2001 k Brn Ply L ' tj
- 31 -
Agency I Implementing
I III Agency 1999/2000 12000/2001
1 . Substance Abuse Council of IRC Ind11 ian River County IS 21 , 036 . 00
2 . Multi-Agency Drug Enforcement $ 21 , 036. 00
Unit .A. C. E . IRC Sheriff $ 109111160. 00 $ 120,480. 00
3 . Teens Acting Responsibly Global
Education Troupe T.A .R. G. E . T. Indtan River County $ 80, 173 . 00
4. PREVENT (Substance Abuse $0
Council Indian River County $ 0
$ 689844. 00
TOTAL I $210,369 . 00 $210, 360. 00
The County received a letter dated March 26, 2001 from the Florida D
(FDLstating that Indian River County Department of Law Enforcement
(FDL 002, to had been allocated $ 144,226 in federal grant funds for FY
fund local anti -drug abuse programs . This amount is a reduction from the previous year
when Indian River County received $ 1571777 in federal finds.
The l
serve as the coordinating unit of government in applying for the fundstter also requested that the Board
April 10, 2001 , the Board accepted the invitation to serve as the coordinating tutu of government named Jason E. Brown
commission meeting on
Budget Manager, as the contact person. g ernment and
PROPOSED FUNDING FOR FY 2001 /2002
The Substance Abuse Council Advisory Board recommended three (3 ) programs as listed below :
Programs to be Funded I Implementing State Share I Matching I Total
Agencv 75 % 25 %
Multi-Agency be
Enforcement Unit I IRC Sheriff Dept. $ 83 , 128 . 50 $27, 709 . 50 $ 110, 838 . 00
M .A. C . E . )
PREVENT (Substance
Abuse Council ) TIndian River County I $ 46, 675 .50 $ 15 , 558 . 50 $ 62 ,234 . 00
Substance Abuse Council
of Indian River County I Indian River County $ 14,422 . 00 $ 4, 808 . 00 $ 19,230 . 00
TOTAL 5144,226. 00 I $48,076. 00 $ 192,302. 00
The grand total of all three projects is $ 192 , 302 . 00. If a project cannot be implemented due to the
budget cuts , then the money allocated for the project will be redistributed to other projects already
listed .
The M. A. C . E. Unit, Substance Abuse Council and PREVENT all receive their match from Indian
River County Board of Commission funds since they are agencies of the County .
Copies of the grant applications are on file in the County Budget Office for review.
RECONTMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Substance Abuse Council ' s
recommendations and authorize the Board Chairman to sign the grant applications and other necessary
related documents for submittal to the state by the deadline of Tuesday, June 19, 2001 .
JUNE 5 , 2001 IJ 11
- 32 -
ON MOTION byCommissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously approved the Substance Abuse
Council ' s recommendations and authorized the
Chairman to sign the grant applications and other
necessary related documents for submittal to the
State by the deadline of Tuesday , June 19 , 2001 , as
recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
U MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT # 019
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30 , 2001 :
TO : Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
DATE : May 30 , 2001
SUBJECT : Miscellaneous
Budget Amendment 019
THROUGH : Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator
FROM : Jason E . Brown
Budget Manager
Description and Conditions
The attached budget amendment is to appropriate funding for the following :
1 . The State of Florida Department of Labor has invoiced the County for unemployment compensation
claims in various departments . The attached entry appropriates funding .
JUNE 59 2001B1 a
- 33 -
2 . Road and Bridge needs to replace two (2 ) graders during the current year. The attached entry
appropriates funding from Transportation Fund cash forward .
3 . The Budget Office underestimated sick incentive for the Agricultural Extension Office this fiscal
year. The attached entry appropriates funding from General Fund reserve for contingencies .
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously approved Miscellaneous Budget
Amendment # 019 , as recommended by staff.
TO : Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT: 019
of County Commissioners
FROM : Jason E . Brown ( r DATE : June 5 , 2001
Budget Manager
Entry Fund/Department/
Number Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease
1 . REVENUES
GENERAL FUND/ Cash Forward -
October 1 001 -000-389-040. 00 $29415 $0
EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Recreation/
Unemployment Compensation 001 - 108-572-012 . 15 $ 1 , 925 $ 0
GENERAL FUND/ Clerk of Court/
Unemployment Compensation 001 - 300-513-012. 15 $490 $0
TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Road &
Bridge/ Unemployment Comp . 111 -214-541 -012. 15 $ 576 $ 0
TRANSPORTATION FUND/
Reserve for Contingencies 111 - 199-581 -099 . 91 $ 0 $576
2 . REVENUES
TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Cash
Forward - October 1 111 -000-389-040 . 00 $ 1869000 $0
EXPENSES
TRANSPORTATION FUND/ Road &
Bridge/ Other Heavy Equipment 111 -214- 541 -066 . 43 $ 186 , 000 $ 0
JUNE 5 , 2U01 0 A is 1 � ' � �� Go 7
- 34 -
TO : Members of the Board BUDGET AMENDMENT : 0 ' _
of County Commissioners
FROM : Jason E . Brown ( ' DATE : June 5 2001
Budget Manager
Entry Fund/Department/
Number Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease
3 , EXPENSES
GENERAL FUND/ Ag . Extension/
Sick Incentive 001 -212-537-011 . 15 $ 281A$281
GENERAL FUND/ Reserve for
Contingencies 001 - 199-581 -099 . 91 $ 0
7. J. FLOODPLAIN CUTAND FILL BALANCE WAIVER - DANA ,SCHMIDT - LOT
2. BLOCK 21 , VERO LAKE ESTATES. UNIT 4 (8045 92ND A VENUE)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 17 , 2001 :
TO : James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH : James W. Davis , P . E .
Public Works Direct
AND
Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , . EC.
County Engineer
FROM : David B . Cox , P . E . , Civil EngineeaL
SUBJECT : Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 2 , Block 21 ,
Vero Lake Estates , Unit 4
REFERENCE : Project No . 2000080035
CONSENT AGENDA
DATE : May 17 , 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Dana Schmidt, has submitted a building permit application for a single family residence on the
subject property. The site is located in special flood hazard zone AE, base flood elevation of 22 . 3
JUNE 59 2001 r 1 ; ; � _- �
U ; i t l � Y 61 U U
- 35 -
feet N. G. V. D . In the attached letter from the applicant ' s engineer dated March 28 , 2001 , a waiver
of the cut and fill requirements is requested. The lot area is 1 . 07 acres . The volume of the 100-year
floodplain displaced by the proposed grading plan is estimated to be 442 cubic yards .
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section
930. 07(2 )(d)4 . of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots located in
the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit.
Alternative No . 1
Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930. 07 (2 )(d )4 .
Alternative No . 2
Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the
proposed floodplain displacement.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No . 1 .
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Letter from Ronald G. Keller, P. E . , dated March 28 , 2001
2 . Calculations for cut and fill
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously granted the cut and fill balance
waiver based on the criteria of Section
930 . 07 ( 2 ) ( d )4 , as recommended by staff.
JUNE 512001 F
- 36 -
4
t
E
f
7. K. PAYMENTS TO VENDORS OF CO UR T4ELA TED COSTS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 29 , 2001 :
Pa,:i � . nangei, County Attornrs ' " Board Certuted, Cit" , County & Local
Governmcn: Laa
wLlu= G . Collins II, Deputy County Attorney'
MEMORANDUM
TO : Board of County Commissioners
FROM : Paul G . Bangel , County Attorney L�i3
DATE : May 29 , 2001
SUBJECT : Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors for the
weeks of April 30 , 2001 through May 21 , 2001 . Listed below are the vendors and the amount of each court-
related cost .
Vendor: Payment type : Amount:
London Graphics State Attorney Costs 245 . 35
Joseph F . Scarpa , Esq . Public Defender Costs 8 . 70
Richard Ake , Clerk State Attorney Costs 4 . 00
D . B . Wiggins , P . E . Expert Witness/State Atty Costs 2 ,270 .00
Am . Prosecutors Research Inst . State Attorney Costs 45 .00
Spherion Indigent as to Costs 399 . 00
Language Services , Inc . Court Interpreter 374 . 50
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 537 . 50
American Reporting Transcription 55 . 00
Victor Perez Court Interpreter 37 . 50
Victor Perez Court Interpreter 37 . 50
Gregory C . Landrum , Psy . D . Clinical Evaluation 675 . 00
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 537 . 50
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 537 . 50
Gregory C . Landrum , Psy . D Clinical Evaluation 450 . 00
Fred J . Petrilla , Ph . D . Clinical Evaluation 500 . 00
Maria Barrow Court Interpreter 150 . 00
Michael C . Riordan , Psy . D . Clinical Evaluation 500 . 00
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 737 . 50
Medical Record Services State Attorney Costs 8 . 55
Sheila I . Flinn Transcription 31 . 50
Sheila I . Flinn Transcription 24 . 50
Sheila I . Flinn Transcription 56 . 00
Elisa LesCamela Transcription 42 . 00
Myra A. Eldridge Transcription 178 . 50
Myra A. Eldridge Transcription 140 . 00
Barbara G . Schopp Transcription 31 . 50
Cheng Kelly Transcription 28 . 00
JUNE 59 2001 I 18 P
- 37 -
Donna Speirs Transcription 220 . 50
Shirley E . Corbin Transcription 73 . 50
Elisa LesCamela Transcription 245 . 00
Patricia B . Held Transcription 308 . 00
Janet C . Prosper Transcription 35 . 00
Karen M . Orlando Transcription 178 . 50
Maria E . Barrow Court Interpreter 40 .00
Maria E . Barrow Court Interpreter 40 .00
Maria E . Barrow Court Interpreter 50 .00
Pegasus Travel Witness Coordination 211 . 00
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 787 . 50
Hammond & Smith , P . A. Indigent Dependency Cases ( 11 ) 10 ,450 .00
American Reporting Transcription 328 . 50
Unishippers State Attorney Costs 13 . 14
Diane M . Matousek , Clerk State Attorney Costs 4 .00
Medical Record Services State Attorney Costs 24 . 18
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 537 . 50
Medical Record Services State Attorney Costs 17 . 97
American Reporting Transcription 50 . 00
Unishippers State Attorney Costs 9 .20
Maria E . Barrow Court Interpreter 40 .00
Spherion Transcription 330 . 00
ABC Printing State Attorney Costs 36 . 96
Sheila I . Flinn Transcription 325 . 50
Fred J . Petrilla , Ph . D . Clinical Evaluation 500 . 00
Suncoast Counseling Clinical Evaluation 562 . 50
M . Ross Seligson Expert Witness 500 . 00
Brevard Co. Clerk of Court State Attorney Costs 24 . 00
Medical Record Services State Attorney Costs 103 . 50
Gerald T. Roden , Esq . Indigent dependency case 1 , 935 .00
TOTAL $ 26,623. 05
PGB/sw
cc: Honorable Paul B . Kanarek, Chief Judge
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN .
JUNE 512001 B4
- 38 -
7. L. GEN DEVELOPMENT, INC. - REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR
THE PRESER VE A T VERO BEACH (F/KIA SO UTHLAKES) PHASE I
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 29 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
ISI HEAD CONCURRENCE :
±1 C
rl
Obert . Keating, AI
CommunityDevelopmentrector /
2� _ S.
THROUGH : Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM : Mark Zans AZ
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE : May 29 , 2001
SUBJECT : GEN Development Inc. Request for Final Plat Approval for The Preserve at
Vero Beach (f/k/a Southlakes) Phase 1
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 5 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS :
The Preserve at Vero Beach Phase I is a 62 lot single- family subdivision of a portion of a 56 . 02
acre parcel of land located on the north side of 5 ' Street S . W . and east of 27" Avenue . The
property is zoned RS -6 (residential single- family, up to 6 unit/acre ) . The density of the
subdivision is 2 . 59 units per acre . The subdivision will be built in two phases , with Phase 1
encompassed within this final plat. Phase 11 is to be built on the property directly to the east of
Phasel and will be platted under a separate, ,future application .
At its regular meeting of April 27 , 2000. the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary plat approval for the overall subdivision ( Phase I and Phase 2 ) . The applicant is
requesting final plat approval for Phase I and is bonding out some required improvements as part
of the final plat approval process . The owner, GEN Development Inc . , through its agent
Masteller. Moler, & Reed, Inc . is now requesting final plat approval and has submitted the
following :
JUNE s , 2001 BK 19 FG 1 : 12
- 39 -
1 . A final plat in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat.
2 . A Certified Engineer ' s Cost estimate for remaining required Phase 1 improvements .
3 . A Contract for Construction for the remaining required Phase 1 improvements .
4 . A Security arrangement guaranteeing the contract for construction.
ANALYSIS :
A majority of the required subdivision improvements for Phase 1 have been constructed, with
the exception of some infrastructure items and landscaping improvements. Staff anticipates that
all cost estimates and security amounts will be finalized and approved by staff prior to the
Board ' s June 5 , 2001 meeting. The developer has made arrangements with Public Works to
submit a final engineer ' s cost estimate and financial security after the Board of County
Commissioners grants final plat approval . The format of the financial security has been
approved by the County Attorney' s Office, and unit cost estimates for construction items have
been approved by Public Works . The developer also has submitted a copy of the Contract for
Construction of Required Improvements . The contract, which is on a standard form approved by
the County Attorney' s Office, will be executed by the developer after the June 5 , 2001 Board
meeting date. Once the final cost estimate is approved by staff and the appropriate financial
security is submitted, the plat will be recorded. All subdivision improvements are privately
dedicated with the exception of the utility system, which is separately warranted through the
Department of Utility Services . Therefore, no subdivision warranty and maintenance agreement
is required.
RECOMMENDATION :
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval for The Preserve at Vero Beach Phase I . authorize the Chairman to execute
the Contract for Construction and any security documents , and accept the security.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously granted final plat approval for
The Preserve at Vero Beach Phase 1 , authorized the
Chairman to execute the Contract for Construction
and any security documents , and accepted the
security , as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
JUNE 51200118 PG 8 :
.40 .
9 . A . 19 PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 054
APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF A CABLE
TELEVISION FRANCHISE FROM FALCON CABLE
MEDIA , A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ,
A/K/A CHARTER CABLE , LLC , TO TCI CABLEVISION
OF MISSOURI , INC . D/B /A AT & T BROADBAND
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
( CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF MAY 22 , 200 1 )
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 15 , 2001 :
DATE : Mav 15 , 2001
TO : Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH : James E . Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH : Thomas W . Frame, Director � �
Department of General Services
FROM : Terry L . Smith, Telecommunications Manager
Department of General Services
SUBJECT : Application for Transfer of CATV Franchise — Charter to AT&T
BACKGROUND
Since 1998 , Indian River County has been asked to approve the transfer of TCI to AT&T
Broadband and Falcon to Charter. In a continuation of the regionalization of the major providers
in the Cable Television industry, Charter Communications has asked the County to approve the
transfer of ownership of their operation in Indian River County to AT&T Broadband. This
request is interesting in that, if approved, the County will have one licensed CATV provider
instead of two , and that one provider will be operating two systems within the county that are at
different levels in technology and may have different mandatory operational requirements .
JUNE 59 2001 Bid i 10 PG 14
-41 -
When the request for transfer was received, Indian River County Staff arranged a meeting with
the other Franchising Authorities in the County that would be dealing with this same request
(Fellsmere and Sebastian). At the meeting, some common concerns were identified and it was
agreed that these concerns should be discussed with Charter Communications and AT&T
Broadband before presenting the transfer request to the approving governmental bodies. Such a
meeting was arranged by County Staff and on April 3 , 2001 , representatives of AT&T
Broadband, Charter Communications, the Town of Fellsmere, the City of Sebastian, the Town of
Palm Bay, a Southern Brevard County property owners association, and Indian River County met
at Sebastian City Hall . The questions raised at that meeting or as a result of that meeting were
sent to AT&T Broadband since most of the questions had to do with how issues would be
handled after the transfer. That written request and the subsequent response are included in the
backup. A letter was also sent to Charter Communications concerning some missing
information in the transfer request and an outstanding issue having to do with poor response to
service problems. That letter and the Charter Communications
backup. response are also included in the
ANALYSIS
Indian River County Ordinance 82-7, Section 9, in dealing with transfer requests, states that
approval by the Commission may not be unreasonably withheld. FCC form 394 has long been
the standard for demonstrating the transferee ' s legal, technical and financial qualifications. A
copy of that information has been submitted and made available for review in the Commission
office. AT&T Broadband is already a licensed CATV operator in Indian River County , and that
license allows AT&T Broadband to provide service throughout the County . One could argue
that the approval of a transfer is not needed in this case; however, even though AT&T
Broadband is already authorized to provide CATV service throughout the County, they have not
been approved as the owner of the headend and system that now exists generally in the northern
part of the County and is currently operated by Charter. This distinguishing point ( 2 separate
systems ) may dictate to some extent how AT&T Broadband will be allowed to operate in the
County .
Staff recognizes that the service levels provided by the UA/TCl/AT&T operation in the southern
part of the County have been considered very good. Customer satisfaction surveys conducted by
the operator have shown that the system in the southern part of the County is far above the
industry average . Customer satisfaction for those receiving service from the
Jones/Falcon/Charter system in the northern part of the County is low. This area has suffered
with old plant and a lack of resources , capital and personnel, for many years. Only recently , as a
result of the system rebuild to 860 MHz, have there been signs of improvement. The large
commitment of capital by Charter Communications probably would have eventually resulted in
acceptable levels in North County. While a rebuilt 860MHz system under the direction of the
AT&T Broadband team with a proven track record of good customer service might seem to be
the best possible situation, there is some reason for concern.
AT&T Broadband has delayed building into some new areas in Indian River County due to
capital restraints. The rebuild of the AT&T Broadband system in St. Lucie County was to have
started last year, but has not yet commenced. Staff also received reports that the rebuild of the
Davie, Florida system has not been completed. Staff questions the recent track record of AT&T
Broadband in meeting its commitments . Since the arrangement between Charter
Communications and AT&T Broadband calls for the completion of the system rebuild before the
transfer, the question of the current ability of AT&T Broadband to complete a rebuild may not
be pertinent.
JUNE 5 , 2001 c p � ;
- 42 -
There is a significant difference in the rate structure and channel line-up in North and South
County . This situation will not likely go away immediately and may continue to be a source of
customer dissatisfaction in the North County . While this would be a good time for AT&T
Broadband to start toward rate panty, demanding such a move as a condition for the approval of
the transfer does not appear to Staff to be legitimate under current law.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolution
subject to the terms of the agreement between AT&T Broadband and Charter Communications
as presented in the Form 394 submitted with the request for transfer, and subject to AT&T
Broadband ' s commitment to meet all conditions of existing County ordinances governing the
provision of Cable Television Service in Indian River County .
General Services Director Tom Frame reviewed the project for the Board and noted
that representatives are here from Charter and from AT&T .
Telecommunications Manager Terry Smith explained that AT&T could have
expanded to the North County area without any approval necessary . The rates and channel
lineups for the North County area are not the same as for our area and the requirements are
different for North County and Brevard County . The channel lineups are not subject to local
jurisdiction . The approval of the transfer cannot be unreasonably withheld . Staff is
recommending approval . He then introduced Mike Tanck and Bob Stevens from AT &T and
Ken Vickers from Charter .
JUNE 59 2001 81 � 0b
-43 -
I' . .. � . . .. w . .a . , .. .f `. � e .: � .y e - .i:k Y'v'v .0 eA , :H e 5 ,":r ✓h' .1' ._. .
i .. :. n' ' ' 4, Y n.> d- ' . .. .fv :� _ :.:: F- t A vb . 4
Ile
Ile
if
If
.,?�"` '.., ' : . ' . . , . , ", . k: � 2 ,-,. .. ,., ✓tet �" �'F ,. . i+ = ,� , 3x 4-r !`. .. 5
.,- ,a"` c . �r x �u �; raEe•.• ... `i
N �. .. , ',.., P�� ... .x �'^. a3. , x $ , ., »n, e.:.. � �z , f?•,.. .7�r< { s ..Ys? ,
t`� ,a:..*. . xi x r+' ,u. }' 'a., � ; r, `a'' >`�3� ,'t .$ , <:.� 3�*, ..r 5', 'S° +'n. r .:-. :.. ''Js+.',
.3,z. ,a :` k`.Y . � . {. ., ,; a. 'is «, 's�" . . ,xr ,;;' .C`` .�f;•. .,.. . C'.r. z. u.;.>n �. . A t.
,„x. s r`Y . , � ar .r. .rs' �c'�' - .tt, a 4' yt'�u y r . . 0 `� x+","+,: + is r.'x'Y°i t�, 'F
Mike Tanck of AT&T hoped to be working with the Board for a long time to come .
ILI
He explained some of the consolidation that is ongoing at AT&T and stated that he would
be happy to answer any questions .
Commissioner Macht commented that Indian River is one coastal county and
hurricane weather warnings are very important . Right now the Sebastian area gets their
1 , Ile
weather from Orlando . He wanted to know whether that area could expect to receive the
weather channelfile.
Mr . Tanck noted that there are different market areas and Sebastian is in the Orlando
area of dominant influence while Vero Beach is in the West Palm area . He expected to be
able to carry both the Orlando and West Palm stations but noted that they are subject to all
FCC requirements , including their "must carry" rules . He agreed to pass on a
el
recommendation to his marketing department .
Chairman Ginn questioned the expansion of service to some of the County areas that
currently do not have cable service , and Mr . Tanck stated that those areas will be looked at
on a economic basis . They will be happy to extend the service when they can receive a $
return on their investment .
Mr . Tanck then responded to several questions regarding poor service problems in
Y .
North County and the possibility of a "weather tickler" across the bottom of the television
screen .
If
Ken Vickers , General Manager of Charter, noted that the only channel Charter is
le I
currently not carrying from West Palm is WXEL . Charter does carry news and weather, with
Channel 22 being the weather channel . An emergency alert system is in place for each
county .
Ile
JUNE 59 2001 PG
17
- 44 -
I Ile
Ile
taw
af4 �= 'tss .r
r „t
✓ f ,
. .. ,��._ x n, .++ . ry r yam£ .
+.v, ".
e '�.?f' ?+ -
. . ...,t« '; .. . r 7sl r, ' . . %yam, Y�.+y ,•,v r L . ."y t .r,..., .a t . .. .
,, u uY' +, 4'x,:3 . xi x , aid �,
.. . ;#, i.+f ;. r..,. '- . 7 1 "`»� lS' '�,^ . a ..:.� 'w 5 fir. ;:, ..e,.. , ,. '5'
h ✓a,,. zr'. x sf':
. .. . W ., .: . .: :-, �c «•,.n. . -Y� >�. Ci - :� .amu .:. i3 ,t r^^ -. . arc ,.. .S :..r, .t .: ...
.,x. n +„�,� R '#aa.._, 5� „'�`�a 5 rc,.y4�. �sxn a.., 4 '+R�..9 �"e� ,� d. . �i �r k3 r
1 „x;•," 1<.,....
w
a x a
���"„ 'S'., s» �
a ,
s -
1 fil ..
.vix: s&,.... ` . " - , i . : � .� . - '- � . .. � . rv - r ��� <� .>:c.. s. ..� . . 2.,nfidx: �o'n �b,.x
- t..1 .vt•.v.o,... � :,.,., � n .. �.:n ..m. � �vo-„ �icfii4, ,.^.^a� F�:,_.,. G,tt Y,,,,... � .rr. �. �Rv✓1s,n. . . .'s�, .. , . .. ,^�Y.c.Pofi
^ :b'�.�� .,..,h�n ��S� Yihe
w.. . `pbk in . . : Y, .wi' r?e: �.>2 . ui,v,: '� , ., � .=. "ry ,f ` 'a43r•£,r�
' �,pN ,
. ' ' r. n - >•ti YaY u"S a. . , ..: , r. , . .,xu"r.. .n�. ,r. �. . "fie , r n �`. :fix ...
x: .,..,,es; -.. ,. . - . =a r fr3. � , � i
'� .
..n... .a- , <. . . ,. , ,a.. . ._.. . , e 'rrst, .. .,.. , . .-a 'A a s, Y .. . " , ✓ .
§ . .tt*�la :x.. . .z
" r� x nsz
u
a 'ft +-`"`±
Hry _..'
Lei
Cl
,r��+a Y
NiF . '-u v+:, , $� 4 � �� ""a'x+ ,�, f^` ,. .•syL �� S a ..r s s ..: ti ,:.x ,. . .. a , - x
. , :.. �`} • �� RRR
��;'L , �' ;' . .,:+ + ' i - � ,x„ xq � . +„� r, xy ,. ., . � ,� ' ? >f' }�� `., n rr w : l,fi" .:.''4 ''z
ASC � vP r �z,, , ^Fn` i < • � 3n�-` �e
”' a a „ 3x -,�' L ✓ a'", � _ -ro . , � �T' , . . »- r : x .. v7 ,Gede ak , "r? epxL�� fi
,. z wi r> � ^4 :c 'te: Yxr i � w q- ' as t '� :;:
a �
t � -
n
Sjj ...
Bob Stevens Director of Technical Operations for AT& T commented that AT& T has
a policy to respond to problems within 24 hours unless construction is required . They expect
to apply that policy to the North County area .
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard x
regarding this matter .
Bob Johnson , Coral Wind , questioned the rates and noted that Vero Beach pays $ 13
for basic coverage , while North County pays $ 26 . He also questioned whether the County
Attorney could explain the legal ramifications of dual ADI ( areas of dominant influence ) .
Mr . Tanck stated that basic coverage for North County is $ 27 per month but those
residents have significantly more channels on their system . Previously TCI created a lower
level of basic coverage to which Charter did not subscribe . In the long term AT & T wants
to offer more services .
County Attorney Bangel stated that he would have to do some research on the other
matter brought up by Mr . Johnson ,
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter . There
being none , the Chairman closed the public hearing .
I .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin , the Board
unanimously adopted Resolution 2001 - 054
approving the transfer of a cable television franchise
from Falcon Cable Media, a California Limited
JUNE 59 2001 0 i18
-45 -
I+. '. ay ' . .��i � .x S„ a%. . .s ,. .. ::-r , f4`.�� 1^' '&+.,..." ,c.N' .#.- '� . b.ry,.k: li v rra f
: .. . ,i°1 �. , . � } r"; . ., , �.� i.±; � M # "d R � '�. 4 . . �3"' .rx•.: ;rete F 1��; -
. ��w ,, . i, ' . -. . _. � •v 3 ,x � . . .. .. F .,. .., £, sr 3.w . ". sa ,at:,,.r .< .Ar , r
'-� <i' . �- � .=.e "is . "2L .-w t. , . x
3 : _. r. .: a F . . : "i '-isi ' . 1 . . s - : . >t.:rf a .ya..u+.b'r '�,`;t. a a 'F+ '...
s e y '� , 4. „g^ . :rc '8'°a t'is"b''r,�' E, >�ik`� •'- 0 1.av<."h`¢' ar sh
r= . . _ ,s.. .x . . . ,.. a'� , . , .� v , . :,. J c .'�2 '�,"i.,k, n:> ,4 i, ^s., r t , r�'.< t �'+,. `�'
L �• ,, .:�`e'"� �+m r .�,. a4 - ,:�#' ., r;i.. ; + .. '4 �`Y: ,�.' .w �. ..,r.�r�. " , 3�. xr. ,s
. -. , .°. . .` q:� f' ?• : " x ,. nk. . ' .. ec„r'ti ssN`f ` :.. �s' rvrl . `.-..E jn a'i ,+. � .,aw
<.;.r4 mr . 2'F`"q.,,� ak. ..•&- ``rv't '',��k.+ r "1,_-. w s1,. .a:a" f:, � °`I�`4 l�,La.,
`t .:fu k•. .,�' . , . . ,, . + ._'w5.:w `�`�'., '�. ' s .�'?a$.�r•.::szo 3r�`9a .e,,q. yro �}. , t_. �$a .
. R`� M ,. . .., p L ' �',4.ri irc ""�', . . ), >�5 °�; ; 'n2 - � ,;. .;� ,pg . Esq” !!f.,� . R � , � .
3�.!n ... _ .�s � " . � a. . .. ..� � . _ r 3-. - . ... . � .. :. . '�'t• � x .. . ,„.'
� � �` . r';-� '° kS`t..nx '� „�f s.. .., '#' '- ,, a, ;. . . ��,. ; , t.. � �
~t: ", t r r : , a , �� . �,. a ... .r . . a, . . ...0. . 5.. . . . ri' #� ��,,.::"S" . �.a ✓i; ,> x.,... .. r:.
, . _�`q s
zr� �� . '. :. „ i � . - . .l .,.. *��. ,. . �. _ . . . -:.n� . . ,.�$4a�, . .,: ,x^. w . .,,. e'�-, 4 :z?
"' ., Y 'k-. +� v •V �s ��`'.1f�. { yt'u`tt{ �c-: ; 't kr�r�^�". z '�"„w � +,.a,��. ..;:�,.°i� 3„ �" � ,�x.' .�� t.'>x SP �i�� <'" -
s! � .
- . r .t# �...... . . . . �. . �A ,. : , . . .n . _ -, _. -R. < „., a , .'sr, a v. _ .. .. ay/, ."C _.:
3. . .. ._.� °U . :... „ "t . .+ v.. > > ^^a ,, .,. . n,,. .. ♦. x. ,. .�.:> Y` E
�4 s,.y.'.KSs�.�,.x�,k.,Fk:x�,vq...:,a'.�.-,.'. . ,.� ,+y�k�„R,�o;.,t €df�"3�. ,. .fn,t..a...tA,.��iu,' .�.t.3<.��.. - ;a,3.�...,.. ',Ts,,�_. " o . '�,,m+z'.�6.,_s..Y?5�.Y.:
r '� „k{"^. .x,,.,�,��F+,.,.:',". ....x:',_ttg�. Y-.;�,..,'. YR" z."<_.-,c�-,.53,Sx}..bk,:.,S.. _...'°�n*...5:,r Y'am:i....'m,..'�r...`�-x.".:t,.x r. c"u�a^ax�#,i.4r2`�+:.%teKedYr`.,".,.,C
n.,e..,,,:..,t��<,,r•+*,"^ssf�e.'r.tn.��-£°..:c.,..r..ryi,v,,.:.y...,:".7.,"�>.Y^*x§`.A,9s,..,..s.,.........,...;,.,.,....:.,:...:,r�,-a»)�, P."?.e,,.;t.,'.t.n�,.re..<,;....,.::<..rsM,•_,..,,;mhnv
c4,..,eaY,,.�.„Zu.,:✓�,ar;,t-rom,'.�+.r-....r.:,�...£,3 t Y rai rs.z.,.,�,,ia b.✓Y.,$,_-.rkF.€..'m.'.c:_.z.,'r.+.- .-+.tal 9 s`s xm�r,f,..w,.`..k..t-.z,'=r,;.z..yk:c,ahY+a4.,��a.'.�h�sYg.3s've'
. .nk.n;^'..,.;,.::,�3fis.v..rr..-.,Y-,... 3r...'+r...t....'_`»,3.�'a')ai.o..wi+; :'..,"-,. k.�. Rr.ein." �.:,*�5, -:.„:.x6'.L''fi;"w..v'..?.,'=>.rtr`3.nthst.i.•°,x�.:."2,P}a^:"...,.,.,..�+..M
n . .
....
.
?
*,
'�.
t .
Partnership , a/k/a Charter Cable , LLC , to TCI
Cablevision of Missouri , Inc . d/b/a AT&T
Broadband .
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 054
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF A CABLE
r
TELEVISION FRANCHISE FROM FALCON CABLE
MEDIA, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A/K/A
CHARTER CABLE, LLC, TO TCI CABLEVISION OF
MISSOURI , INC., D/B/A AT&T BROADBAND.
WHEREAS , Charter Communications, Inc . (" Franchisee ") owns, operates and maintains
a cable television system (the " System") in the County of Indian River, Florida, pursuant to
authorization (the "Franchise") by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of
Florida (the "Franchise Authority") , and Franchisee is the duly authorized holder of the
Franchise ; and
Pee7
WHEREAS , Charter Communications, Inc . , and TCI Cable Partners of St . Louis , L . P .
and TCI Cablevision of Missouri , Inc, are parties to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated
February 26, 2001 (the "Agreement") ; and
WHEREAS , the Agreement provides for the transfer of the System and the Franchise to
` TCI Cablevision of Missouri , Inc " ("Transferee ") at the closing of the transaction contemplated
by the Agreement (collectively , the "Transfer") ; and
WHEREAS , Franchisee and Transferee have requested consent by the Franchise
Authority to the Transfer in accordance with Indian River County Ordinance No . 82 - 7 , and have
filed an FCC Form 394 ("Transfer Application") with the Franchise Authority requesting consent
to the Transfer; and
WHEREAS , the Franchise Authority has reviewed the Transfer Application, examined
the legal , financial and technical qualifications of Transferee, followed all required procedures in
order to consider and act upon the Transfer Application, and considered the comments of
interested parties at an advertised public hearing held on May 22 , 2001 ; and
WHEREAS , following review and investigation , the Franchise Authority has concluded Ile
that the Transferee has established and meets the legal , technical and financial criteria to operate
the System and has satisfied all criteria set forth under all applicable or required county or
federal documents , laws and regulations , including FCC Form 394 .
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, as follows :
1 . The Franchise Authority hereby consents to and approves , in accordance with the
Transfer, the transfer of the System and the Franchise to Transferee , and the assumption by
1 ransferee of the obligations of the Franchisee pursuant to the Franchise .
leer
JUNE 5 , 2001 Vii1 PG + Ir
- 46 -
kre ^x;•a .a mi^' : t .xi e,
t aRsfj+ :-. .^ ,. 9 +:rx. Yv + . . -. u�^r, • ., :xr }s->'`^ k ss .,sr ua ++ x ,.:.F i.. ',•wy .. , . d i v.: „ x ,+ .
. u., '1 sk s. ,:, r g .rn ass,- , x.� :.:' .
INS
rh w,; � s• .,s�, r vv+x +C�
'`a3 >
. ,, ,.,. , � z . :, -• . ,n. '. . '�` ..a, 1? . . }. : -.;, r . .i: . K--. „r, �- ,s ;x,..\wF' ,}u .,,:.
x ,t^'z '.:. . Y --,. �� xev `ra "� }.. .p� , k �:+x � :h`"t�3akY� h , , ' � u §ds.p dds.sb^ a, , .. . 5� , . r,s'n:
.' .v
: ',x' > e w c
J:v Y5 , .i ^� 3� d
. -r t. - r. . a . ma.,`» ' ,. .,' .., .�'*. '*T✓" I++ . rn ' + - z `'# � ,.- >~. 'vx �r`.x '',s
x.�_. .i+3 ran .: x n ..,�->i; �i �` A � : ' R., , f ,:,.,,�+.. , s.
zT' rN .,. ., � r
s,<'R.` k
x
aze W<�� '2.�4
se-
lee, lee
, .. ..> - . . k, , ..ed d _ .s . . . . a - e - ._�. .: . .. .:.. . . x ., r'.. .,, t •a , . ,, . . ,�
3 „ '� , ,:. e ,._ - .. , 3 . ,.. . J � *�`. •�"'p x aY ,}:. � y� ., v? ,.
yEe 4� 6q�gst . •.'A^ i:: , , ,.�- wv :,. ,.k . w . .s 'P... . r . �, + . ,.,; a >i v- . . ,?..,. ..
� .._,.t. . „,, <, ,, ' ,-,F �' _ . ., . ,na„ v r.,:aa <� P .+'
. .n .. ...v. .. - € . .. gym ..,, . ✓e, :� 5 w,. ...,.>e�, .rS r , x . ., +. ;• , ;-.�M,..h i 1 .c . .: �
.. � Yu .,, ?i 4, ul�' "t .. 1�3'.. [xr ,A..,Y "� '�r� Nur- .�,�- .t.. .a� .� � ry
{ ,...,w „ i. , € �a5�.�. rta ,.". r� . `.,"e ,. .. : ,:.: ' .k ' � � Yj*w V,=, /�M ,� _�',. x �,,.,$ {
i s c � r .3} a . f 5 ..,cr } '".;�' 'Yk g ;F, e '-vw �°x*�a'"��d`�s 9 'c .t •"1�qs, ,< q,, xA.
''4<V" n ., s.. , x.p .� ,;e: .. • . r r v..y. *h , ..� ,: : .�>+ � : ,� ; ,. X . ar'a + � r �
��9� � x _
RESOLUTION NO , 2001 - 054 s
lkr
2 . This Resolution shall be deemed effective for purposes of the Transfer upon the
closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement between Charter Communications , Inc . , and TCI Cable
Partners of St . Louis , L . P . and TCI Cablevision of Missouri , Inc .
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Macht and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n and , upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows : I
k
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Ave
Vice Chairman Ruth Stanbridge Ave
Commissioner John W . Tippin Ave
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams AYe
5th
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this )nnd day
of1Uy, 2001 .
June BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest : J . K . Barton, Clerk
By
Caroline D . Gi
Deputy Clerk Chairman
Inlui Aim Ca ApprovaC Dale
Admin
Legal
Budget
Dept.
Risk Mgr.
JUNE 59 2001 oilF c
-47 -
��. Xa .. , - . • , :- �.o:i " u,. >• . >. � s „��„ �, s�,- ,. .«r as �.� ,�=`'ixs" d € i . �. ,< +
�. >. ' s � ,� rl ,,
w. ..,.% ' .- . , .. '.., rw . .,rx • .. ,. xi ` . ll-_ s .=,. . , . '�.,. . , » . , t . , s ,, ,� ..., ,
. .. r +,,,.: "' x` .. x Y' : .sr �'' r x °`#' >a: x {.a h ;-: 't ', a ,
L -. c•.: ,. , ..ps ..r. .rU " ,.",*fi.. . sF. . , , , e..,,.:m . . i . :. { vz.. , . , . vi". :..v
qE -,.-4 ? ,�' 4 " ..,: ,. ..
? . v �. <> A. .ra. ctin � .mi.. i v. . . 5: `✓.r::: Y 'Y .. *�+.. f M ,GYa :. , JM » 4'?:.si+,
Y d"y-'VF'y 'r,tx pA Yi Y �i ,. � �� fi..: 9 F 4 . Y»s'.% b{ {. a`•2"-+Yh':"� iYtr y%
h . . , c 't�k >,k>,. � - Y� , �I: s`:,z«•,�.A r3 .. .#, ». ,em.. .�,,,. a s 'r., ... .., s ,..� .. v � a s...,.
Yk.r t 1. . +,.� t u , ... :« ,. t �,•;, ," ',x, c �h. . . . . . .
..�a€ .
kv •r u
"4 � .,.r, . .,. , .� n .Y o l 't✓ ." r4. ,.:a4F: 3 �A tV. "a.4. . ., ,.,... �...(' � +3 Y, 4. >7>*�
..w �' T'. . ."y5<T 3��t � rz..r :�<- tee'<.>�r 3 � , rY G'. A�tt' %A Y + � .€ ::.
'r, :+ F". '^s-r e.,..
uri ^ rxa
�w'' .:> . :^ . fu " .., < a• v .... ...,r. . aa"�u'- • '".4i`t ` „..il+.«F .,t `4,..• a s. *,.;..
,- y, '< �..:.�;a, ,s v a .x x 5va a ' ,r
,..
c z" > ::. x rr '. . t� <:.. L r
.W.':",w ,ea`.-'�N•� . _ et3t "tip. . � , v <iA m= a4�3 rskszt. �:.&` ..��^s� . ,<xs+•s�{+.vM,�a r „kr, » >• ..n..,.x , s °+s�.. s.�..
,ra, .v.= � ,. ��,"�. �. ,. <,��. d..uz �.'S v. .w:b., baa• . . , a.. z , ? " ^.n: �T +<:.. "`v". 'm>r, to-. � z<.d' »�' J,.S.
.: -, , , .. '. : ' . >•. . :s ?. rkf .. «z. ... .. ,. ,w- x. _. . . _ . . . L .,,+, .,.,. ; s :
.t.7.;, ' . e. . 5' .h� .t� -. , .+ c ^,s".�„T' t `"a! ,<_ ,. . , a ;a ,. . ..,. . "fi'; .s ,b `5 Pa r .A'r ,±+'<-.Sz�.
� xfryp„ s $. ,: � � Yt s” ,., . t, �i"r` _r. .,... 1, 1, e , :a„ a, ark ... ::.d: ,F :.a., w . .r., f` �:
W .. a: .vC, -� ,,:, . . vN . , ,:. : sst..,.4�°- J^ �c✓ As:.:{ s a. z5.
nr .;s..vi. .. :, dr. ' . k G. rG � .� .. ` . .,o•. ,s.�. .,,f �. « .y .. . „ . S ....: I a...i . .
� � a x F
,. :5�_ ., m.. ,. ;s _ , r .. ,t .�r, .. . a< - .. T, .�.: ', ,. . ». . . w X . ,.., < n 9 <.. . . ..
.. r .,. ...,,C ¢ n ,rr- 4,S r•,... w , .. ., . > A. 4 rk" '. . ., w �, ; .�. , ., � r. . ..k,.,
. . � r. ,.. ,F -.. . . . :. - +S s -. .« F2 „. . +, .. , .,.>.:.. :. :a ... .� . . .. ✓�< �
. .. a,_. x 4 , r e < . .r., . . .� r. teff. ., . .,a . . �v' � x.. .. .... s.b'�.'t� 4 �„w��:;x ..4 ,r
. ,,.c ,a.. , ,e. ✓ . - x. ?:, er. .. ...., t. . . . . ... . .. . .. ... :.h Jr <r _ .. 3 S . x
�' ,-i { .. . r . �+' r <:. : � N .. y.. �, ,...a , k . t`
> F}?. >,�x •: :j, s ,,, . - _ � . m . .. ,*�. _ . 'fir. .:�3,3,sn � . ,+. ,ry , :�s. .. �R ,y ,.... ea ,. . ,..r '1 ,..
,... ,.t w ..:s. . .:: "S' ..,. ,.ax ... x "�, .: d�.
.,
a
�W .,
b
9 . Aal PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 055
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS
> ,
REVIEW (TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REVISE THE
" CULTURAL " OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES )
AMENDMENT CPTA 2001 - 01 - 0109 - Legislative
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
( CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF MAY 22 , 200 1 ) -
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 22 , 2001 :
TO : James E. Chandler; County Administrator
D PA TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE a '
Robert M. Keating, A CP ; Co unity Development Director
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chie , ong-Range Planning S
P
FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long- Range Planning
DATE : May 24, 2001
M
RE : County Initiated Request to Amend The Recreation and Open Space Element
of the County ' s Comprehensive Plan
JUNE 59 2001 rj1 ' �
- 48 -
T'
48 -T
Mr _
'� '.v ,$,.
.......... ...:� .c�+ .�R .rr• :; ,. .. � . _ < :� '`s$- tr . ., .... ;. :: r .. ,v4 xq. _...
c � �,r r . s.,: a *3' k} d ,r ,.� < �.. W n . ` r'- ur
4.."'-;Sx .. '' -. w - . . . . . ...v;+ »_ „.. ,. . . °,�. , a ,.w , p. ..:{b �. . :;' . v + �+,. . xr. ..s.a,
« _ a .. .,. ,, s-» '+ s ..,r-.n .. ,., . iv . .k -✓; x , , . .. <i! + xk. ,,kt-: ". . . +,..� . . :w. , .s
'F.., sas
-
&5 .,...
„ ..
✓.:, a i .i. '� ,-,: :
, +'rem
.,.rx. , ,r ,. : .ni.. _? . s... , .,. . . ,, . s' t. +: t ..<� ,v,�,4y'. ,ta .:++ -rx * ` sc s a;.wx` "sa x €. s
d >` S r • : : kr. . z 1,. ,<. .
;s„. > . .. '�{, +.}r, xsr„X` #''w,ry .. i y^Y 5 ..: 5 x:..:€,.r m ,1 3 2 t ,nt„+ x✓ . , m
,
;'kT'»..w= s, . , • n v :,: < : "..�a � . . ... `; ax,.. ..... ~„'� ...,; x .5 a r � �:' 4.. _
r � z c . ,Ea-. '� e � ,� ,.Z,, �^ ... :* ^ 'xd�,frw,
,s ,. .. ;_.. �s?Y . . sus >,', .� ,,r '. , . ,� .. - - _ ?a^1- ., . .✓ z`,.' .... `� ..,. .. , aF
z... :...: . . . ...?r '� r . .-r.,.w 1., *'� a ::
v'. . h . � � . .. ,.- ,.. - k : _ „ ' X3- „F. M' i ..,.. iJ _..e< :4 „ 4 y .� r' -0 .,f . . :,,4 .4.
. ..'•.4� .r,iµ,Y n .£a ,4sWY. ,,....fis _ri5 , '= 3ti h ,kms , „ f :rak� >tvs
..k` 'k. ,.z.
. x.-. n ., _ F „ .:r«. b *;.n^�i ' ,. ,3 -n..ne , . - , vsl
"S c . ..: ...n .. r.,. E ✓ . � E . M.>'^t . .w. . .,rv. a .f3. G �cn.'F, ,. 'S s '44 4
� =:�,N'N Kvx��.nn� , p,,. `)w 5 't E)•"1: :vr.S”{� fix ' � r 'rc ..r:..
`f.:sa .., ,, , ,.. ,�i� .. $°' , {. - a. .•;?x;,,ys - --c, ....5. >!3..._,y.� �`: n. .. ,..., y.. _�„ .,a f
,: . .oy. .. ,. ,. .. 2 3�x; ,rJ. ,F. �. . +.? a ✓., p,t) nt: <. R .. £Y,.. } � +.:. . .. � } + •,
., �' . ..,.,.. ., .. <,. ., ,.m .,...:-,, r . +.' } �.;,, �s �'S , xx,`� a r ...,+. . >S. '•.� '” 2
�Y, 4 f%,>vX.y:,.Yd ' n �+". .. . , M:.. ?yt . ,.3:�4> 'F x xik 1.. . r
.+ , ..4r,. ri. o rfr. > e. , r. c" ^,.+. :'r't•°. .,.wi , ,-e .
r' :.> z , d > .,::v s' . ,. .� .. v '@ y s 3 r : .; k n' ta,„ ;xfi
' . "'.. r , , .":,h$` 4 :c .. .., ;` .. , . v ., N. . ... . � a . 'S` ' ° , wuax
5
.uc _ #` ,aT:. eS .. .'✓.._sr . ,: .. ':-+. 2, . _t ,. PS., .Yw` x .. a, .
vYys.t. . r
� i F,.v�:..vr-:xt.'..,.,:,.vf.,,.,.. `4»ata.omJ,..,,.s,.fs".L s'..i-'ce,:_..�-'..„-. .ft r 4a+rb,�5ren.,f:,,....,,r.
.>...,vo._.”:.,_.-,S S,* .z,..,o-<§.k.;e.,,.,, -�,derffi am,%nP.o-k,..;....s"�.v.«. ,i✓d �;.r.....a'?.4;a9..-
,x.ra34
.'...
.. . s i w r' � r,*, ,..u.,c. . .. 7''s c..*:; s +s•,,.:, +.r . >, .. n -,-.., . _ ..... .. ., -. . . r .,:,
x,:. w k w ,.. ... .. ..,,.. .z �. ,. . 'r' ,.. .
, ..., ,.. ,t .t - - r, ,. s a '� r . :. � , 6- .t - ?z';z�°,*' . , . 5,f'.. . . , ...• . y. > a . »+^....
x , + .> *i.. a > t. :' , t x.,rv, a ,v x � asFrt !
g � r
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : CPTA 2001 -01 -0109
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 5 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On February 13 , 1990, Indian River County adopted its comprehensive plan . On March 17 , 19981
as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Process , that plan was substantially updated . The plan must
periodically be reviewed and revised in order to reflect the community ' s changing needs and desires .
For that reason , the county has initiated this amendment.
Although the Recreation and Open Space Element of the plan currently contains an Objective and
a policy related to arts and culture , the Board of County Commissioners , on April 11 , 20004
instructed staff to initiate a comprehensive plan amendment to create a cultural element for the
comprehensive plan . Since that time , staff has worked with the Cultural Council , which is the
county ' s designated Local Arts Agency , on several aspects of this project .
The development of a new element requires several phases , including an inventory of existing
conditions and facilities . For a cultural element, facilities could include auditoriums , theaters ( indoor
and outdoor) , museums , galleries , and classrooms . Conditions could include an inventory of arts
organizations , the size of their membership , and how many people use the various facilities . This
phase could also include a description of the condition of the facilities .
Currently , an acceptable inventory of existing conditions and facilities is not available . The Cultural
Council , however, has offered to help develop one for the future .
Recognizing that without an inventory of existing conditions and facilities a new element could not
be developed , it was determined that as an interim step , prior to the development of a new element,
a new goal and two new objectives involving cultural activities could be added to the Recreation and
Open Space Element.
Those proposed changes to the comprehensive plan were processed for the July 2000 amendment a
submittal window . On September 28 , 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public
hearing and voted to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve that amendment.
On November 7 , 2000, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing at which they
considered the July 2000 cultural amendments . At that meeting several concerns were raised
regarding the proposed amendments . Because of those concerns , the Board instructed staff not to
transmit those amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs . Instead, the Board
instructed staff to continue to work on the proposed cultural objectives and to reprocess them as part i . .
.
k
of the January 2001 plan amendment cycle .
Planning staff has continued to work with the Board, the Cultural Council , and the general public
to address the concerns raised at the November 7 , 2000, meeting . Through that method a new
amendment was drafted and submitted during the January 2001 plan amendment application
submittal window . fly
The subject revisions delete Recreation and Open Space Element Objective 11 and Policy 11 . 1 . and
create new Recreation and Open Space Objective 11 and Policies 11 . 1 to 11 . 6 .
t
JUNE 59 2001 BK 1U 6' 4
-49 -
t
�> t
�.
�?` r "k°
'�dF�
«
a�,e: ,>YS,k
s. �:.*; , . ,v7_ . , . ' �> � >', { , . . . _. 4# ., ., 2G ».�: �'7 M�' . . ".. ... z+ , * , .
,:..". $ ✓_, Cci. ,.. + < ... ; a ry , ,,; ,. y=, o- tdd= r�*� i x .:��r","' ,t:` . '3',it *bc � ..✓,>ar �
v " . {.:, x . .x .. . . : 'S{ , .. �; . . ,: � .,.. „ .ry Mc , F`i »�' '.;t :: <x `•• .,,;a . . .x3 �} . , . Yv:r� C
.°; 1`� -:. , �. v,r. .+ v ,o-.kP¢" "c . ".,'' t r �{.. : " =x�, A �:! 1 A`r G^' � ¢ s. .:a, rg
Ss ,: ., ,,,q ' ,.y . . ..s. ,� . s' .�- r, 'd ,. rv . +: e` . . .a , .., „ - x=', a .a,
, _'+• rw , . ,.e.. },r,Y , '� „ -ks s• n„ r .y„-t ...-cn
� E + 11 a:
I $
,.+ ..: d
�t2t�� -. +� ..„. .:✓s .�, . .+ra. s .afi"' � .ram....@ .a. .x* .� k,� 1'a5.:.ris �-:r•ux, 3�,�.,d're'aa,r
>,e`$�:
a , "r; . d,., a ,. �} ''" _�' l�fi," e.�. . .r.- .,.a, � .3 .: .#^a v L. .-,R � 4 ]^ s
^+r s,s "• 'r" � ,+ fs ,m„#,'. '�. . .,?.,.,. 'Y
. .`x :.-s . . < r . '� .. , ?E� R , ^: .. . v.... :�.. .,. a m E< .w. . ;::. .. . � - . '.;
s .. '�. - . ,. _ . ., Q��:` . _av, 3r intik„ .. ., � ,. a.✓..
hss r- . Pt.. r - . . v p< , , ,: .�. 4. ✓ . . .,:. .. <. . , :.:. rU,... . , :v* * ,: , v;'. f
, .,«, ,,,. `F a ,r . .. ?t - t, „z .n „a,. ., k x..., ... . . .:,.A'u ,..,E $ . aa, 'w ta, ^!s:P t f v .:.
..
h
{� ...: .
,e...f
. o ..-, s.
e' ��'�' y � �'&��. � ; ..'� ,•+ �N <�g<< fe :. `# "& ��€„ � � � ”' tw < . - � „S,'+ 9 `-�tk'.
' • r � vg d. , � _,: elr �r,t . e ' �c:
< Nf
y�
5
The proposed additions and deletions to the plan are shown in Attachment 2 . In this attachment,
deletions are indicated by 3'=rxe7tnhTrv- u- - g-m' - , while additions are shown as double underlined .
On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to 6 to I to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment with the addition , by reference , of
definitions of cultural organizations . That recommendation has been incorporated into Attachment
2 .
On May 17 , 2001 , the Professional Services Advisory Committee voted 9 to 0 recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment .
ANALYSIS `
This section will present an analysis of the reasonableness of the proposed amendment, followed by
a discussion of the consistency of the proposed amendment with the comprehensive plan . 1
ANALYSIS OF REASONABLENESS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT
An objective and its policies form an "objective cluster. ” The proposed new objective cluster
establishes a framework to guide county decisions about culture and the arts .
The proposed new objective is measurable and achievable . Directly related to achieving the
objective, the proposed new policies are actions that the county can take to support arts and culture
in the county . It is important to note that the proposed policies do not support any particular
organization . In fact, they are specifically worded to refer to all county cultural organizations . t
,
Finally , no changes to any existing policies or procedures are required to implement the proposed
policies . For these reasons , the proposed amendment is reasonable .
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Staff reviews each comprehensive plan amendment request for consistency with all applicable
policies of the comprehensive plan . As per Section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the county code , the
"comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of
the plan pursuant to Section 163 . 3177 ( 2 ) F. S .
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important pans of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the 1,
community ' s development. As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions -- including plan amendment decisions .
While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in
reviewing plan amendment requests . Future Land Use Element Policy 14. 3 , however, is applicable
to all plan amendment requests . For that reason , this section will begin with a discussion of how the
proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Future Land Use Element Policv 14.3
t "
f
In evaluating any comprehensive plan text amendment request, the most important consideration is
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that at least one of three criteria be met
in order to approve a comprehensive plan text amendment. These criteria are : el
• the proposed amendment corrects a mistake in the approved plan ;
• the proposed amendment corrects an oversight in the approved plan ; or
• the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances .
JUNE 59 20011
- 50 -
,rvu w.� ..''", s{ ,f + ,"'y ; Tt' �' rf ,s .�#.. . tpt�. , 5 " �'. : `::. t ,'„+? a t „r: - : X . :.t . '��`:
. 1 > ass x ✓,F.z + �.�. �,... 4 r
y:!Y,. . ,..- .... Y. , ,T aµ. x s � �,.x ,_,� &'�' ,..a• . ,:w Kr :�. I. ,r.,, . R 5 a .,..Y G :f .. .m,
ew ,. � i -'. r --'' -. . -. s, :x t «wy=. N ,:'s' .P „�S•. � 'a '!ti" :fir : :', . �< ,
:4 ? +„pd.;. . 'i�... . ' "a :ID�W. : *s,$i 'x„ _ . ,�:_ .. :fx*..s, gsi, ,v,.„;.. v, b£t,v x u v e'h x` ..„,, ..- s �,
r �,'” � , � �: ,+ x ,c kv"s . r t +,. k .,N.�✓ ,: r �,`- .
, i � . L ... � :� . , � . ; e .« . .,. an ,. s,. ✓k`p: :,t t x:. .yR r : . ..., ti i; u n , a .. a` . ,
....,-. a „ ry. , < s } .::`: P Y 4 h a a ''�4'� a. x�r . ':s,.c >S .
:.,,? ... .n � ? »•. a WS':" K. :� .. ..:.. , h -m rs.: a.,:� , hs '4. ., t~ ;.; ,. -, 3
i _.-,. x a . - r ..:: . ,^,r*- a - .. ,.r t .. .:. .±s «'.
s7i :� ,� i. . _ _ - • ,: ✓� i- . :r, "} } +-"b�� �, t `r .e. . k . � �.,. . tf hf ::� sY 9 ..-: ...sA
� �' Ma`s, ,:? he 5W'. -+� F""y *.. 's
t,.,$mr . tr .H, y.; < x ^P ���:a9.��.� "�i§�z�.�. .,..v.KSt. �:.-a--5a: R"d.,. sr...a:.rr •....w�:,,:au . 6.,,+, v. .�.. :.. . ,. u. . _r. .
s , t ..'err:. , ,. , . t . .v,.,r :.xo. ,. :..« _ ,. . ax x % . ac . .� :, 3=t: alr,kn x« �: >,., . m�i�,u,,:.,sys°L.'� }c.5�.,i
r . . s. h. ., ..n � . .s. a ,. , � ;
rAv , � y ,,,. , f m . ..& ' i 'y ,,.., x3w ".:{.' , x .': ., 'er. x ,;.< .. ., , v,:
? 1'.xi s r .:
£e a . .o- . ._ n h <3.zlr
r `rt , x ^�. .ft;w" ax;Ys"x � .
+.3e
n :v h
w
. , ,f*
x2 r
x ':r r>r . .,.„
„ ,, zi ...,t , . . :a xaT:,rr r2'' r• .. ., s . .ugrt t 'x "' .„: #� '14q ` x , . z , t. ,.
r
r ��a_=a„ •d4 e , . . :, .. „3^.g .. ax :�, .,� 'r 4' ` '” 4 xs z . :t r > q;
�+ +^} m > - `t,`. ... .x"':'uY.',.- r., ;� "':: 'i3,�•-X_ t't d Y
y " . ,, . 1
3
n #
g, w . :.. ✓i , T. xN .
xr
•
1
In this in (: iance , the subject amendment meets Future Land Use Element Policv 14 . 3 ' s third critenon ,
the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances . That change
in circumstances is the Board ' s initiative recognizing community desires and the benefits of arts and
culture to the county ' s economy and quality of life . For that reason , the proposed amendment is
consistent with Future Land Use Element Policv 14 . 3 .
Economic Development Element Objectives 1 and 6, and Policv 6. 1 .
The proposed amendment is consistent with Economic Development Element Objective 1
concerning lowering the county ' s unemployment rate and Economic Development Element
Objective 6 concerning tourism development . Several studies indicate that art and cultural programs
have a large positive impact on local economies . Additionally, an active arts and cultural community
is often cited as an amenity used to attract new businesses and industries . Economic Development
Element Policv 6 . 1 specifically notes that cultural offerings attract tourism . For these reasons , the
proposed amendment is consistent with Economic Development Element Objectives 1 and 6 ; and
Ile Economic Development Element Policv 6 . 1 .
Consistency Summary
As part of its consistency analysis , staff compared the proposed amendment to all applicable
objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts . Therefore, the request is consistent with
the comprehensive plan .
CONCLUSION
The proposed objective cluster establishes a framework to guide county decisions about culture and
the arts . Containing methods for specifically defining and measuring cultural activities . the proposed
objective is both measurable and achievable . Structured to positively impact all county arts and
cultural organizations , the proposed policies are county actions that are consistent with current
policies and procedures . Based on the analysis , the proposed revisions are reasonable and consistent
with the comprehensive plan . For those reasons , staff supports the request .
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis conducted, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners authorize the transmittal of this request to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs for its review by approving the attached Transmittal Resolution .
Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed the Comprehensive Plan
amendment process , advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County
Commissioners on this amendment request . If the Board approves the transmittal of this
application to the Department of Community Affairs ( DCA ) in Tallahassee for their 60 - day
review , a second and final public hearing will be scheduled to consider any comments made
by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan . If the
Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA , the application process will come
to an end , 1
JUNE 59 2001
Uf I i 6�
- 51 -
ti wx, ' `lt' . , ::tF -fi 1xT{qa t�dz", sy a ye. . ' . y . w - *» 5:- `. s ,•, `' 'z' } t 3 k, r
"J +, k ° t + s - :a-`5 } 'k`'
D :ty75775775 , ' C.
3 L at t+• ,„?v. . 4' h c ft4 ;C,: rf aC' rt
�` , .;: ,ts -.Av, ,. ,n.a��.. 43�.:Fe . ,.x,o: .��r� , +1 ,. .., , ,.., 3., .�< - � . }i< „1 tr ;�:' €' y-r...
-M ',f t 'x' n t i +t a.rS"._.. r. L,.�m . . q..: r ;•.:
'=.,E"( a... ' .'�' ;e . . ,. . '..ii ...--�e:e".='� ,C' 3N v}S; . yc ,::4!v nes✓'�';. - - d
'3' izt-r:•
.,..,x.. 1 .. r. .,r .c .: r 1 , t } >♦:.r :c
„_ '''. i r rs' . -+a i yz, .:;�`, . . , ; , x, .. ..; so , , r f ` },aY X,. :.xa
k " >sS `s' . ,">& '' 2 ,y1. .:h sl`^x
.r. , } s x �,s „e �., , e a -rv.. ,`f4 •, , .,., z, , e ,'._: 3 t S .. s - a'r�..
e , {_ *` `d If
? <... �,. � 'z4..: .:r � + ,-a;x t ua , ,
.-c ,, ::t .,{�+ r s £o :.;. m .Y ±' < Yt y r ;n. 1 {. w *s . 'Y,k. f x <r„
„#-
.¢- r £ . ,. , , , ,'-t , >.. . r .... : ., 6r� .,.>t. �' , +.. t ,: i; . �, 5 ... ,.. . <.
t .�'a�+ . � ,rx: . _A,� a ;,. . &�z� ti:� x .. ar ,
t ,�.� , . r.i1� L;ttv.M.°3. : :�,'G'as�#a.� °ai��iay..ake3fkers £�'3at ✓�NY`� *�3 ,�c "£m���� .�.rm�f . _ �. .. ,�„ 3� ...,l a . ,..r p. x « ury :
,
p^` e ;'S° 3 �'. .. € 2 _ :,v: 3 "'z ,• '. : ,; xs :u ;vx. ,x, . ^+ ."... � .. . , .y.. "< x e=: r. r"` aa
�. i.:w x , r , <'_ s-� .,: : t .. �. k a ;: Jj'3�,: .t+ � t :' 2 r,- A -, t
5 ,�...si ... rte .. �•:. � k ��.. . "�$i 'Lry ,r ei i F^yd Y.: � ,:, .a. . r..... Yi 4 ..c.. `s. c ., :.
r i..Y Y .-,.. � ...' 4, ye., 4k. i `i`.: 'f.t} 3 v � : :W k
t .• x .; K,a .,. , , . . :. . s .. aKylq . . � S.;§ : . ,., ,.. , . *i`.'.,'k a . :wi Um,,. . , _:,: x
a :^ rc- ..,.,:> 's. f:. ,, ..§ .x `r- k:,:. :,.: %` p ,»z�A a ":i ' i fi
fin .� . .. a ., . . : , , �, �+:� -.. a. 4,� s. 'R. .. _. f s r ;,. x,. ,. .,, .,x .., :, ,.. r , .
....,,. , cY. r , .. � .s a e 1 •. .`�, . a� ..,
„rv(.. . .m., -..r n� ry h,. T� .. ' � r :.. g. . M . 4s.Y. , x. , , .. ,,t 5 ' Al , ... r . G. C?
: :d: t • . hfi<x � / Y$ u
5Z
s„-... 5 },: _a . . ,;hx,. ,. . , . < ' .,, ..t; . ., ... n : .� , 4- � , ' .: 2 .:., 1. .;, .:.. s
e �, � _ a;w° r •r^ C`rr ° i r rv�aJ
' ..; / rn . _ P'.q .S . : .. s,, xv.,. , . -` ._f. r z t ; ;F �.: ,q4,r.,. x,a r ..3 r a 2a*
+ n rs z .ea F ti Sn ' .a•° cars .....
r�
1
.
�sv'sx,:-�
Director Keating then used a POWER POINTTM presentation (A COPY OF WHICH
IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY ' S MEETING) to explain the amendment .
After general discussion regarding the 20 % growth called for and the fact that this
amendment would not affect any organization or their activities , Commissioner Macht noted
that 2 organizations are being formed to meet the goals ; the Indian River County Children ' s
Museum Society and the Indian River County School System Collaborative Organization .
He also stated that the 20 % growth is simply a goal .
After further discussion , CONSENSUS was reached that in Policy 11 . 1 , the word
" shall ” be changed to "may" .
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Bob Johnson , Coral Wind, recommended that total funding be obtained from tourist
taxes .
Commissioner Macht noted that the amendment allows the Board some discretion but t
not in the source of the funds which will all come from the tourist taxes .
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter . There q
rr
being none , the Chairman closed the public hearing . l - `
t
JUNE 512001
- 52 -
£K•x 1 'E igy-»*t '`3«Y -SU ¢ n ,"�-vbi'ari s. aw3, s`-""F „ fit .. � 5 '`xf _ ' air 1, 2 , -.: ..
° x• X },pq5 .:.M $ n*r t ' '* ) t ,,, . 3 »i.. ,„ x ,< .. . .a : 3 {', »
x; 9+. wr ::'S n,
Y�x "2 .d #r qS
„}' tp yr r t ' v _x "`k`#r' •"�"Sf., r x :,�:. . tL.ts -',rs' 'r' x t ^ / :::s rs}.+.
s, y. xr . a ^ h s
rv„ Yp., s r Y, , �.+. v^ .k• .� ' .. ,•v>.s- @.f 3 < s . + F T a x ax. r
"*,. a x r,4 `G } r r^ 'v
'u;,<-a.. t . . . .. .,�'.• .. .ui: ..+3, y . . ; � ,.. . ,, a . ., t^N -x. : ..',� k- ,n ,. . ., x.,, rF ,{
r � k � >, "�s sa v= .ik 4 z , ,? s$,r �.k5�'S, cY x�` .'4 �>
a ,,.xv f '"Y'. �w� .ea.�*,�w rr ,,..a.;rz;�� ea .. -,f:,a ,, :::s x „ P [ / .. . �„ ..
v. n c t . e.",+:^ a „ w rx,;�- � Y irk•
o f'�,,f,;� bg,._ "n .0 H x-. _ �.' . +�'� ; , `l�$;.n�at'4s b. : r•. .,:.. � r, „ . r t . . .. / .r "`'
. . .. ., , "3 .s ,. !. ro � 5 .a�; �.' µ .i � K•. s x.,x .r
.. r.a,1W'K. a�%t:,T;.-.:.o�.*. ra�.a, �s�t:t��w, .;aA..'.a,m u >t R.�rvc#�.,-:�t,pd'-r^'�'.,'�'Yc�,}.' r.{,Sc�:,,FcY^�.�.'v1,,.ntHx§tt,yF`3.�s',:��:X,.x.:. "`wi5k">�Az.,I.�-.ti,ttS
.`st-,.'�,yc� �.f>`d".>,. a 4„,.t.�>.,,, . 1 ". � °a."Y?��>h,�4. ,�,:art a�.a�„xi v „.,.�.a.,ns.-.z,-.,r.n u • . . -nrv.`l 3 . .r � x , r`v.;. .°.t., :.v< _Yy'..'F
a 1...2.. .i9ti���`. , rxs4.
}�e�-,�ad �`N �
. Y - na �3. „
ryx
. Ytr ,I � s.,
F :;r ,yh aF_ � -'z'sw
...„ . .. a.n v .. . .. F v' :1. n. ,{ �.' k. F.. • r - .t, v. a:a . , b � F..
4N <t , rv :.t- k• 2 - N 'r- .4.fiey £ r6-i” Y
, iV .a . h= s . w x. 3 4 N• . . .x . . .n } ... '. "h` w w -. __ e t -e s.. . . .� 3 €.::.
> „. >i. e 4 . h .., .'.✓ >nS
v, ...2. . �' ,� w; h�y °.,#y, t . e w ..,., ayh t .r.:. . ara- '� ••"'•k. R. . „'Ye 'F ,� { � . ,.: k. .-.Y:. . ;. 'x
>.; ,.> r :.c .. ';i ..Ar 1 .t..> :v. x7 .�' ,. t � s ;^zt. r. .:� ,� a � � - ' cx � r.
� MrA w ,_, any '' ,x+l : • : }T �rvy"8 .�' t.".�:' c .�r.:� , ;:
,. S . S
N �• s.,. 5
Lif'z'3 µ'*� + rz, .rx s � '#.ns`k,�„a"�` a, v"ko- µS's e • A� �x xu 5. `,^ tk *F,w .� ,..sE,x.,
v;..af .,n=I I I I I I
u
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht .
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board
unanimously , with the change in Policy 11 . 1 from
the word " shall " to the word "may " , adopted
Resolution 2001 - 055 approving the transmittal of a
proposed amendment (with the change in Policy 11 . 1
from the word " shall " to the word "may ") to the
Indian River County Comprehensive Plan to the
State of Florida Department of Community Affairs
for its review .
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 055
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY , FLORIDA , APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT
TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW .
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990 , and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its
January 2001 amendment submittal window , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan
amendment request on April 5 , 2001 , after due public notice , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency voted 6 to 1 to recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the comprehensive plan amendment listed below ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on June 5 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184 ( 15 )(b ) ( 1 ) , and
WHEREAS , The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public
n
hearing its intention to advertise and hold a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan `
1 .
amendment process .
JUNE 59 2001
BIN i I G PG
- 53 -
s H ' �M" ; w -.�"1d,' t . ux . x .�.A •rr . . ., "sSs M.a: ''� - `E '. a" r': r t k� �w + m z,
s : .s •% "t r{ ' r�-_ rr
Q&7, a
5:>•<- �?iu +
k 4b -#. x ,s£x r,'>f, .' u. 'v`*sf r --^�.. • "# Yn;. : s' rSr. ..„. +.. :. . Sx u ....r � .. ''
,4 , .. - . , ,a; a sxra_: � 1`MEex . , s 3r '#*v, a, va
..
� v
3 t ,.f ..a.. � .:"v .,:�a.5 3,� � Tf�� •;,as °;ti s ? , :;h a t fx1 , . -6 �' > 7 x .� F" sA
� r� ,,,.• k 6'T£'� n✓ 9 .uµ, tk '.t
'^. ,�,r^ , ' Y:: C# }A"' `"v,4r:•`r5' . .€, A`h °'�” j{e y` � " k >.e 7"F b a` rw h a x `' ! -
t .. f q,,y;. :-. ,} �%' ,N .. tK-.wtw?:. ` '`+ ` ', " r '•'> r .� i ,i " kk. ° x 1
+ i .,,w r �Fc" sf' w . t ' ,. �.rv,,'-M.^ araa• ' � f: ' xr v. :s z. r p , f~ t k -t' ,+ — '+
. , fi t kK 1 Y ,i ;m. ..� F
.y f �`• ' . �. ,- ¢L t 4
t .t r t., r u - Vii` t hIf
n C k .r wmrw':S^„ a = � . <. If.11 � ,.- . ri; 4 asw= . .. » . , 3 � ,. . . 1. 111 ,. I P > " •5
_ � 4 �...�r . . 111 11t�. ..t ` v' . . ,.,. . . r r , < .> r d< "r. - -11� �n w ,
R" ay4w. a�7xY ,,.d. �" � S \ B�§Y� �Yz \ 't ✓ + fir. .+ x r {: 't4 r, f '�� �' T Ca S
o ¢n k , w,_ A"c y.x' .Yry 4 ! i
tf „� „ . tr a' „<: ' :� [,'� - . ,xc '� }��.,..� ,} fire ". '- ✓Y'r c+ fie. �, y,, f 3 , , , . } 5 ,.';
,.. r » ' yk �r ,f'.,;r �^'+ bS. tit r 5 $ �` c t
\ x+m / � �`�'% �^'�'t.' ¢�, 3. 3 -.+: . ,Y' >,�: � ija5 J, x..-E, ":.4 € y' ,+.".;: . r' . , ,.� F k A , .. .._ , . : �
< . ^.x: + .:v --e e' r n.- ,{„w' t z k z•`
. ,.F—^s.'L'.,.
. . . , .. . :w�
. .., , kw4 m l .,
�'�s� �=ar, xG^. . �t>
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 -055
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
i'
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: t
1 . The above recitals are ratified in their entirety .
2 . The following proposed amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan
is approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs :
Request to amend the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive
Plan regarding the Cultural Objective and Cultural Policies as shown in the
Attachment to this resolution .
The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Macht and seconded by
Commissioner Adams and upon being put to a vote , the vote was as follows :
Chairman Caroline D. Ginn Ave
Vice-Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye i
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held "
this 5 'h day of June 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
� r
BY :
_ L C� LoL
Caroline D. Ginn, Cha ' an
ATT
Jeffrey K. Barto erk
i
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
9 '
s
William G . Collins II , Deputy County Attorney E
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
r 1411,
Robert M . Keating, AICP 1
Community Development Direr
r
Indian River Co. Approved Date
t .
4
Admin . l
Legal
Budget 2 G �
t
Dept . 4
t r
,
Risk M r.
k
JUNE 512001 10 P Lj
- 54 -
0.
G
r , z ' ,s
s .} a
aN "` a :^. >t • �'
,i"a i a,
�.'- ,�. K.r .qa �+� b 's:' . .�, $' �s. .. �� n.�.�' ,y, . +% r�v >� �„ : :�w '" "s �.:� � �` r-Y < �. . .v✓: �
_"�
s, e . ., ,<5h r. 4.z, .w .. ,u�"r , �,.r�. ., .. . . ... ., y + _ «. . -. _ , .„ . ,, .. n Y. . , x,
.. . r. . .0 '.,,„ �. . a ,z4 � . x � . ":_`ti. ,$.
'+
i�� k
r^ax2 �'b, . fi .,J
l x
• �'�" t � ^. 'a �"$� � � ^, �� r . #fit l >, 3 '��z�.
"# iia
5 +wi "
a
rr, {� x�p?
x
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 055
ATTACHMENT r
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
OBJECTIVE 11 : Arts and Cultural Programs
By 2664 , the County " ill have a progimn to Facilittlte tile 111 " Vilioll Of the alts and etlittind 2tetivit?"
irr tl M c ottttty .
r
,
gailiT21tiotis , 21111
lird
it
By 2005 , the number of activities and events sponsored each year by Indian River County cultural
organizations will exceed by 20 %n the number of activities and events sponsored in 2001 The
number of activities to 2001 will be identified in a report titled "America for the Arts Economic
Impact Study " to be published in 2002 . "The National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities Manual "
(TNTEEM ) shall be used to define cultural organizations .
Policy 11 . 1 The County may support cultural activities by providing financial support through
tourist tax revenue and the Tourist Development Council
Policy 11 .2 The County shall support cultural organizations ' (as defined by TNTEEM) applications
for state , federal , and private foundation grants The County ' s support may include providing ��'
customized demographic information leveraging the County ' s grant eligibility providing letters of
support , and providing other support as needed .
Policy 11 .3 The County shall consider arts and cultural activity funding requests only for
organizations (as defined by TNTEEM ) that submit the following information to the County Budget
Office :
detailed information about the organization ' s accomplishments during the last fiscal year,
specifically as related to funding received from the County :
detailed budget information pertaining to any funds that the organization is rP stinv
CODING : Deletions are indicated by aha ; additions are shown as double underlined .
JUNE 59 2001 i r
- 55 -
N,
55 -` `^„'h ,�� ,� z , t fi-? ., � xvr m �§'ksii. 0 •k t� n;,.=` ,"s 3%'`ti" t w" a"'zY s.+
`5'- :;c'b i°.*r, , 4x � , _ „".� . a `•A. � sr . lk
A3 '
e..= . x ,,�$ `� �. ;�... , r ..,,,t�. r �fis,,,++s� , ;�t„ " ..a�niC-"`��"e�.'8: �. ,� ,•+i ry,-4< J-
.�,� � � i� '�v� s " R . }� `b� = ��`}Y:r�,�. �,r r '�,+�- n
x ..
t4�;s�>^ : ? ,<;x*. �„ la a� m s.: ..✓t 'fir, : �.a:s;��r� , .. "53�.�4�'�,. , a ,; , r -� . ,,F=. � u
;.d"� a.. . .ky�ra•..;r,�:_ . "�u;�, x ...rN., :�.,.
. . axs% � _k, x.. ., , .fix. . . rt' - -„fl `�++ r "aP` tt , �. : ' "� a�. s ;w�`w?i' �, 'Yc . s?
i i?ar. ,• . s : "�s`,.. .,� br `F� t��%' "dx'” e t, Z: c c"<x
xtm "•en ., 3sr . . . .. -�. .�;.1r.3tiid Kw� �i�` ,� �3 ='-�ca�m�r°:"=�.4 arcC�` ��r2r,�G.PB aC�2��v��.t a x�..^�i
�` a-,. '� ��� �fv 8 '" a ."szx -' ��6:�` � � :" n'.�.. �`at�? �- .k�.,�Sci�9-k. �^��
,}} t
z ;:Fb .n ,. i . t4 a <.: ) _ '-.} �1 1 v . a. -x :„ ^, +. . W .� •u , :m >., �ti; ..
3" c bE 5 'br, -.:k%• ..yar„. t T .�"^:.” ."i� ' rs`r,.- T,a. ��^ .
.a ., , �,• u . , ,. . +�> - :,: ., , r :; . _., -t . �a?t ,, v; x„. ..,.., �:t «, x... r x s
,� t=” "� � . >� . : -r N .
:r
z� . ..
_. . -, ,,: ! : � x � t , . ..a - - ' :<. .•i'. . . mm,,��: .. . ;tN''. .a', s .. , , ., ,rW°, . . r
<. n =G< : r., < '.: w : � , .,1.?f v `-a Z.. �i `; R 'S' sr �{'
"«4�
,a. ., ..g ki. ,. . . x : - seR .vl -. . rv . y �,., x 3<„.}.. ._ „n - ,. , ` t .^
;d, :. sN ,< . . , t . •$'. , x' . . 2»atr ^' 'r.nk5^ f'n.'. p . �., te. ,. -3+,
,_ ai .._ . 9 • n . .�},r y, . ': .� .. , w.:. . x,. �' �$z"'P.;,Y. x5 ' ,�.. ww n£ . ,.,e,^a�,. . : � ..
v . 2" . � :>,r-,+�'n i . 0 e �,. r �,t i '� F » � inlr,*
: . ., r p, � k , - e .Yj {y� .c .�'-fz sf.., �. � -:, "• . .;.:,r.- . ,H "� , . i�i?'ry +'• - ."�
..,�. nw zda'�':,, < , rY is � k`. spy%r �
ry}-
;. .$ i f u Je { . . t ..-. . . - .2 .: , tr Y ,..a, . ' gY1'��tiv . 'G,. ' ,e�, •. , }: "�k1, -x. A' .
:°^ y'„ ' mak' . i < rkh C
e.
ry .. . eN- ' , . i ✓ ,. r a - ` ��, '� < fir,
, .. . ., �r _ .. .*rb ",, Y:. e +z.. � .. x , a...,, � k.... a .. :e �'� �,` ..^: y:�" :-„ „ �?rar'
ki . : b . '" '�^-, ` •g . � '' �'s�'3'� • ra ` '✓F.= ..., . , ".f ti' ,. a ry.F?+.a T='c
y' yyy `d it �u + , .n • ., V,.. .v t: :a „r.-'� e: ',r. :., � R ,w a. , ., mn :. _
n: . n;,.:r
t '
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 -055
the organization ' s proposed goals and activities for the upcoming fiscal year and
a COpy of the organizations ' most recent audit if applicable
Policy 11 .4 The County shall support cultural programs and events by allowing the use of County h
facilities when appropriate and not inconsistent with County needs
Policy 11 .5 The Board of County Commissioners will annually pass a resolution recognizing
October as National Arts and Humanities Month .
Policy 11 .6 The County shall support the sale of the State of the Arts license plates through the
distribution of flyers , and posters in its license tag offices
Fy '
CODING : Deletions are indicated by 9Wke-H9r0tnhe; additions are shown as double underlined .
JUNE 59 2001 ca
- 56 -
L h
Sx kk t }
�8�4. 4 :'�„ < ,. � iw %J° n.. N '.. . . '�. L Y`: R'�'?p�^F ss:� s� *Yay�, �.� ',Y.+�'C`- ~v F` �° . ?��}i"
,'Y q'. bfi'. rs}i�y '.•:. 'u �, fit. . . :'�' r ` •}fid ,th-w ,•,`Y
:, .. . . . „ ... , .:�;. ,,: 'iS � , ,- �tr.�:��� ' ?�:w. r>�a rsr�'k d< ,:�,.v �. , � cxt . " . "iy`y 9.r-. ➢`�
`" r3„Ttz.� � ,�.n y .� j,.. z - � - ". ``x ='w�• u � ' +i •« �? b, ff sga w°;
.. .. � -. , . , ` 5.; ., ;, , r .2n .o-� . i �. • .- �i � M� .,=x< ,sa ,,; .'„° �`rz'
v 7 ; ' ''b�?�s4'i„a�.;.;y'..3 �`�'� sr.P'�3 nF ., .. a . r r� '3' r�� .<:C; `e�;+ "k
`* : a`m .,,, t "•, . '. a S �-., - . ax.,� . ,"' , . +-a',�s1�,r�' �+..a�'�+A � nr ,R ?"��2 .;.� �:'v`s F"'3rre.�,>.rY
8��'S f ;kk; ` 4' ,Y ",,`. � '+ 3 A ., .,u '€` i. f "4 ro
;. -rix , ,. : rv: , ' . "�, .v!. _ ::t -..hv�s' . .,. :,%� .4. . .:�.s ��' .,.xr, , ,». r: i» v.x. $�"
},q: =j63:Nx ,... w :;& �'s� � ? .�j.m'4� ..z�. - ;:r4 � »�� `� .e �, i` . •,+. :`.
$ a rx
'. .. .s ..� -. ��at� c N. �s2}. .. ` v�• . �Y �; . ✓: v. :az: Fk'�,.,�'�r'F✓ > >+:. z ."�:i :... s�
. ... .., .�i`;�," - � :' �' "R• x n� �.T� e���� tJ fi=r +=.:'.
,
e=
.: a. ''� 9 ; ... ^ x,.n,;... > , , . , a; ,<., ''S.Y�., fi,�' ,�R 4 .,:. xs•� . . "�`,; �'s. �+.K
.t n � ., ,.� .- , �. . % ` �4 �• 'w ''�� :ts.�' sa n?.z - �a,�, °4'�i ` '
t.
x vµ, a '�' `� w rr C 3'n,.c "�'�-fi 'czq �n���,iU➢� �r � .;.« .. s, � , .Y �'-«' t �" ,`^�„v
a",�},rE•1' ��',+€, r <^ m "`5_-.•
.3 -. x , - , ,-, t a, , b. t y .� ,.. � �,,,..a' ,' ',„"v 2S,tr> .. . ; ,*~ a°F �'•:�+7�.n�.�k R,'�.-''
cr.,s'�:k,: arm a ,.e s �F �,�.;. � � � t �: �;. . ,��'
:,. , R�< �. v„�.�. ' ' �•�Md.+3,.. ,:+�. . k"x�fi��.f:� ai g '�o a t ,� +.i. .E.,dx'Sh` "�- .`�.4;.<"ti . t �.,
m' ��� ` ,Y ..��r �'k .�� � . , ��`��,.'�<'�'��� � �r E, � '
v.. . . tla . . {14' x•.( s+ 2r a .. �f. '':,gka. x, ,. � 3 ^5�. i *.t, q�":Y� ^x >_hR!* s�ka:
3 �a: a �A. ".�.'. � �' ns'. .':a
� . ,..;
�' .. . . . . t ,5. f : . . ., +c. ,,. :. .� ..va ..' . _ti r .,.:F,^. ,:... , , <i r. .,r.::i,. .. s..;.ce
_ .. � �ve. ..r i m r .. .. , . ,Y r .,=. �.�; , ..: � a • ^,
:`:
, . ... - « S tl a ...'$ _ .. '?M ,r ,�^*` s7.. 4 '.M^✓!' Y v `-'a : e-„k .. ,u,. r. ,rh a +ro.�
�.'�i s<r„`.s 'k „.., ?.,. i 1' ^ kk,' ' .a^'S '�" ,f t ,t^ sfl i
s . .x x .. s �+ t � A �,, 3 n, , x>, .._ �4 Y1h.x �a� � ', : ...,>+. .z s' fes. �,:y : + - . .
. a. _a,•,��,,. .. .. J . . , ,: ,. . . .., `� � x ,
4y�. �
r yu
a _ 2
P.
IdITIT
ITT
Tl
If
ITT
IT
AT
,
: � T
L I
TIT, T
9 . Ae3 . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 056
TIT
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED
I IT
AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
T IT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDAITT. IT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS
z ITT
REVIEW (TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE1 ITT
IT I
LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY ' S I TIT.
IT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ) ( CLONTZ PROPERT ) ) It
IT
(TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ) - IT ,
t
Legislative
ITT
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
IT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 24 , 2001 :
IT
IT
IT 11
TO : James E. Chandler ; County Adminsitrator
ITT
DATE May 24 , 2001
DEP MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE2�� ITIT
,r,
Robert M. Keating, AICPj Comm y Development Director
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani, AICP ; Chief, Lo - Range PlanningITT
I TIT '
FROM : John Wachtel ; Senior Planner, Long-Range Planningy�
RE : County Initiated Request to Amend The Text of The Future Land Use Element
of the County ' s Comprehensive Plan
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : CPTA 2001 -01 -0111 IT
IT
IT
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 5 . 2001 .
JUNE 59 2001
0 1 FG A a
- 57 -
fIT
TT� �
IT IT
� t
� � - JJ
�, 1J 'l: �, µ. Gyd y A if .Y 1 `e• ...: d .A N ir, .
.. .^'„ x . ,`, C �Y. &., ' " �Y;fl s. o -rs 31' tiler 9,`4T w r3 ?4 `3's`t1`, �i<., r.. rnfia
a .Fsa {ns ;Tk., s" ,x- 5`+r+ts, y 3. ra s
.. •.. "� �` = ^r .I lna..,v' 1T p44n , , .-:?; ..,u: i' S� r, x ¢ ^gx +r' «x.ce s..."b
' k�t' K. y� # rnb .,. .;u . ,c'�
z . r a d .ams <� ," : '`� vim" ' #' J .a. Jp fi` i .r 'p .,£ xei`4 L. Px x 'S " .y,ris .,,4'
..u � .:x 4 vs". ,�F. .p. v3 .� �, 1,1.•....:
'' S �. �; .v"�'^""..a , �.i �.. s - t ..��^7"i , ��36. . �. aux-. }?;, �'} .�;.,. � .,�
..�,. � = 'rt+'
- ... , . , . u. +. ,.. ,A xt� , ..# 7 ,.:...m M .;;vs N •Ty . . M r. + ... ,;?A.$n'' :. '
. . . s.u, a k - , ., w ', .
... . ss• ,.�` _ , N ,, '., . 3 xjs�,,: "A iim, ,1 .ry r.:. r. ,Y- ;` r•3. i.. , , �` -., "l
IT
' -tri ,r„,< .. ,,. s ? w .. m.4�'k 5y. g . ,,. a §x�.y �,, - -:r ,e s .. , €,�'e �. ��x� , ,�,�.. ,�
.�'”. ' ..> '� 4 �.:r. ec}x- ... �i. �
:V ': { e . - S h, - ,.e„. . S .. . '-- >5 +h ,.. . x e , h+: , c , 'i tki-«... ;...ft:q„ ."tt
t ”, �+�;. ,.�.- x-n x hr'$ ix 3' 'a...'; on r.. ',$, ,:z: `fi, t �,. .. _^:: + " , `r� n �t";;,`
=`=tz
_ �. a . . .. z ..�.. .. �. . '„ .Y a. ,, res- x -- ( 3s' ara : } •xY a ^, ' Hs J s }:,..
q., . ,am3
,r ... , ' .r ,d^' * dvk ,x' - . e ri^»e .43 "i.::< t,. .a� .+, :. 'i �,..
, :d<., � 'C
E
s= - - ,. 'N. ;ae. t+ �£ : , � 1. 2- !.rm, w ,x "re. .� �. rh kU :3
.S , > .}. , ,'•r?'.. +-.> _,.. £ ^e? 'S ,;.x' >* s x. :gyp (, , '- ,
`^x r- ” ' ..:_
d �'.,;,, ri. $` 8'' Sc*, ,utx' , "S , k. f'; a' .* r cix 5... _ . ' t "` , , s,. '4,
#'4 t�",�i k t "rr„ � ,� v' ,s. yl . , F «u. ;.. >,
���h` , � _ ._.:e =F<"�"n'• . ' ' �s . . � ��, 1•' Pa,.. n,.r .�, .'^�;ia,=`?hT:;H �t«s�',« a�;,.x . tx4' ,r:�,_ _.r xh .::._dYc'�
.... <t'rka�`v''�r �''s��'s ;� €'�.:,rY.�..uat« � �o-�.sz,'���� '"'��e " r v;� ��a���k , . �'� �a� . : ,:�� �";... �,::.
4
. . Nyy a; [, . : , ... �`a'- > :R. . °v,:}. e . . p, � ., . :.., y , «. , 4 > ... 'f •.. . . _ .. ,i.
._ t . As' u ,�.� :,,.:r r,:ac� *,^ ,: , }�, 5 2 d ; �....., , ,;.R. v. . `*5". r :2 :;.s: ,k"3 e,x v z; .+�
;*x ^". i +•% v . . �;. , , : . � ri -m x . . r� . a .. . v > . , , . ="r < ri4_ r+'�'=. % ., , <
< . ,.;?- .. .. :r �, ^ r : . i'ed .3<� .'e.< ...., ,: .±, v }dk ' 'k�`s'. ,`� 02 ^v ;; ¢..
:.. ;r..,sz,. . . €ri,. ,� � rte?• .. +„ a-.. .w . :�' . � . .: � _,>, ,. a ,:' � ,,, �.� s . .. 'a '�3,. .�...
,,? g � z . �.+"z h�F `
a.: : .. .>,". � a. v.- :,a . . a. . . , _" . rr; ,�'„ ,. . ^.,, . , .. n �, ,. 'k s •,. ;U,.
. s , ... ,. T �k ,,. t �%>='n , r +.,jn � �a, < . "�, ,�r ,rt,�x.. �� ; � e4 4„<
k.s
>. . . �t. . , � r r. 4 , `� . Y .. . , .. 4 : < . 7 _. 4 . , :.. ,. . m. ",.++ a`' . .,, , , o .
r •i'^ t ?a'�
,3`0 . r . 4 , ., . 1- , : .�. ., .. x h �;L fa:+• , ;J� ;x ..�4� ... . x •�' .v' :- . ... 4>5 r”?
, . "n.. �" .: � . . ,:4,, k :..., .: Y. r �' ..n;., rt <, ., •. Cr. , a� ..
.a�'.� . >. ° 3 ,. at�• . n .,, 3�+ �5'x, c .m: .. � ba. =.r�ai.. � r ."?"��'kr r . :.:. + � 3� .:. m �,.,eH
S � � zws.�A bq. � t ^ �s�^s.,}� �t �• .;� ,4�,n, b '> =�§ x .
,
V
.. . . .,,, .+•>r <. a ,..._. rz s > ,» =b +, eek e ,
INTRODUCTION
On October 9, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners held a special workshop meeting to
discuss expansion of the county ' s urban service area . The urban service area expansion issue arose
at a previous meeting when the Board considered a comprehensive plan amendment to expand the
urban service area and change the land use designation for a parcel owned by Gerald Clontz.
At the October 9" meeting , Mr. Clontz ' s attorney , Michael O ' Haire , presented a proposal
( Attachment 2 ) to the Board for creating a "transitional " area for land meeting certain criteria .
Recognizing that such a proposal needed technical analysis , the Board instructed staff to review ,
analyze, and "clean- up" the proposal ; and report back to the Board .
As instructed, staff reported to the Board at the December 12, 2000, Board of County Commissioners
Meeting . At that meeting , staff presented several alternatives to the Board . After much discussion ,
the Board instructed staff to process a county initiated text amendment and a county initiated future
land use map amendment to implement Mr . O ' Haire ' s proposal . The Board, however, stated that
they did not wish to preclude the Planning and Zoning Commission from considering any
alternatives , and that the Board would consider any alternatives recommended by the Planning and
Zoning Commission .
This staff report discusses Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal and several other alternatives . Attachment 7 , at
the end of this staff report, is a matrix summarizing the alternatives .
17
Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal , in plan amendment revision form, is shown on Attachment 3 . Staffs
proposed revisions to the plan are shown on Attachment 5 . In those attachments , deletions are
indicated by strike-ti s, while additions are shown as double underlined . t
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION
On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at a public hearing .
Although all seven members of the Commission were present, two members filed Conflict of Interest
forms because those members have interests in property affected by the item. As a result of the
conflicts , the two affected members could participate in the discussion, but could not vote on this
item.
Regarding this item. two motions were made at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting . The
first motion was to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt Alternative 1 ( the
O ' Haire Proposal ) , with the following three additions :
• prohibition of Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants ;
• required notification of the Florida Right to Farm Act; and
0 150 foot wide buffers .
That motion failed on a 2 to 3 vote .
The second motion was to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners delay any decision
on this , while continuing to study Alternative 3 (Rural Villages ) . The Planning and Zoning '{
Commission voted 3 to 2 to in favor of the second motion .
Although a majority of Planning and Zoning Commissioners eligible to vote voted in favor of the
motion , Section 103 .02 . 12 of the County Code of Laws and Ordinances states that any matter or
application considered by a board or commission with more than five members must receive four
or more votes for passage . Since the Planning and Zoning Commission has seven members and the
subject motion received only three affirmative votes . the favorable recommendation technically
failed .
JUNE 59 2001 n
UR
1
- 58 - , .
,>
MX ,•:`' y :d+ �. a
,n.".o-t.Ym'xa:uw F+`,sni n.,'�.: x,6r,,ny'.>,,.<,s,.,'.e`N<'ke.;.,-'.S.,:s[.',.s-.,w)',.hY.a3.,,s4.x.:,�. �oly'- 'Pi-. ' t , .... V.,'...,,. ., :x, #�`.,,....�ff
a'_ -...r.:.'.. . .. r r " '.:- :,,: . . . 4..„,.A.,..-....,.,,;.�e-..�f.r.r.".„,1....:...yN,i,,s 1..»3Lw>,:'t_3x. ,.ry�v".,.<,,a,...�c,t.'..w.?,..ae.,�;,,v.-:�,:,,.:i..�...”....�.`
.<.<.ar''.eyJk�.`t!.�ry,�'>t'•.a:>�"dvS;w'bav:sMrt.?}Y.�»e.>.+.,w"..n',A...g,`..�,b5ry`1i.'.'i,tx'€F5'�'+�btr'"Y^Yx#vr'„,tG,. . :<m. ,ra.n.r
Mime
„t -b.s„�zE=Zs
,s�..'v:,s,,.R.=.,-a.c=aa.'.4,vry',..�..+:,s5.,.�.hcr.kF,`.^">,*�,,,,.a:ar,c.sa�Y�",'�k.-,t.*.'.rr'.,^_'.,:a..sw}x>S1+sh1 x5a`rm,✓w'i.+r..r`"1,,.i.r:�
.:,,'t'-._:..T'..s.;..k"Yr..e.*>i4.R#'''*.,{"._,Y. t�R....",>h,*kx. :x'wa�F.i`,.,
,t.:'_.r.:x,tS...;..,:�b.3t3>.u.t{N r9fM S.„r'>>�F..k.7v'."sv�;a,, ..im....'aa'x,...,,,'�..,.'+<....r�'rtnQ>..„:::.x'..,..✓�f,�r4+<:yw
x,->'r.k,w'�*Yk1s-'u`m..?$�.�+x.3pS:.�^.rv.,>,."a.,t...'.-^.-,?,.,_.s.,`3�P�`s'.-��'='a,a.i,'�.ur3,'.;.,:z..^..�S+:..:1s..:'..>si..x i.s n',f.s.,, x'P..v,�air$:-.�.^.q;r
.m::♦4F<.M: M1��,. .,M.,.:.t k.. '.t ,” . _.°':g,3..��k-..:7,..,{..r't#,t@°v�--aa.„E.�Yf�xa,S"..§�-':.w:sye�.�4'.ah,
`.r:x.::4�"..::>.e.
•, 'th,�"t'd` su,s+..,.i.t gk,t'3.ar.''r:'.
+;•z'.
't' f
';3nS:At. s, ..¢..:„-a..t- _.. '>{'tna._ .`” . °v _ � -..,,:.. FlF2�> _ ✓m :. . .. »a n - ., �s^��R `.x*.:3., r}tA�d�cSi�:3,
fux1 S[�,L"�V>xer;a..;+ ,.„`fi:�'k'.xws r'�* s s.F�^�">l9,r.P,v.:r�t.a E,5^{ na<i `3F. ,..,-..;>�:;. .� r
111 .:....f...�. MMM1"«"C<.a+.t,yy,..�n.sr.#S^...�*a'_x.ms:..�.rwt's a�^]r't,aa`a5'3>>,,�.'f £'.,..�.#3'eK;.x>t..:;,a.,.,af§„'.�2Y"pw.
�'y.�N,,,s.r."s,,,.rrt,..,'�s.t3,e,ta3�.°�.v...,-a--�.."pk' �•if<-":z.`tv,'>�+�#'�t"ti:..vfCs.��*,v-3:<'s.„",...s... �?,a5._..`i.��^,.s^-v':..�r, .< .'.+4��a.vi” �t"Q'�n ,
r �x,,.�uK¢:"�s'w��r,'���.;`Y'.` '& �vv�:r33.�.g;.,ri.<'��rrt.xor..�,,�^.r..Six
�Y�Vi•i;1"a:.'
s.:,emrk>^'•S
;.
„'�' � . . '9'�. . .yy. , . - , .xf . .,. & K �' '�s ., , .,. . .... ,x'�3a ."�' . . ...: .. .
� :: . , :r.• 5..,4.. ,>„ i”. ,. . +x,,. .Fx.R i^n '% . ..... .rn .: a�
%:. , :Ya ..r. e .. .. 7 . � .. , .' � .. : l ,. �t. . . -. F .. .r. i, r.�� . . ,.,- . . .g wf r.,
'Le... v. .2:i ne .+ . ,' + . -a £' ., ....; f, b,4 ^i .x •3!
� 1.' a a . Zl, a: ..:. 4 �' , r: e . . . . v . e x -e n , +e.�^ .q�,M • ...V.. '<'}' v y,
,t Ti .. �S �: fk .... 3,- &. rss t , .M^V _.. t¢al ' ^::y,::.
`a a . .:a^az ,. ' : . : f, . . ,! „ ,,�. .. , k<� . i.. . . � '# .w w• ... . em. X '-n3a.1 . , ,x `�i
a
.'#tzg�. , '�. ' �a r s , h -' s@ Rsrr. : . r �: . ,, t ^ ,fq ..,: ;i�'«-". , : . s..,y� z� ✓.� ..�' s s , '!
x .'cr+ <.� :;" ,��' is 'w e �.a - .�' :i�,., x �.v "^u# � ¢.. '. �Ya� �'. ..
411
s
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION
On May 17 , 2001 , the Professional Services Ad % isory Committee voted 9 to 0 to recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners chose Alternative 2 , staffs Transitional Area Proposal .
BACKGROUND
On July 11 , 2000, the Board of County Commissioners considered Mr . Clontz ' s request to amend
the comprehensive plan future land use map designation of his property from AG - 1 , Agricultural - 1
( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) , to M - 1 , Medium- Density Residential - I ( up to 8 units/acre ) : and to expand the
urban service area to include his property . Although the Board denied the request by a 5 to 0 vote ,
the Board indicated a desire to "find some relief for Mr. Clontz. " The Board also acknowledged that . '
because the circumstances affecting the Clontz property were similar to the circumstances affecting
many other properties in the county , action taken on the Clontz property would have countywide f
implications . For those reasons , the Board instructed staff to continue to study the issue and present
alternatives to the Board . Those alternatives were presented to the Board and discussed at the
October 9 , 2000 , workshop meeting mentioned above .
At the October 9`h workshop , staff presented several land use and urban service area alternatives .
In addition to staff s alternatives, Mr. O ' Haire presented a proposal to the Board . Attachment 2 is
the specific proposal presented by Mr. O ' Haire . By increasing the number of residential units that
could be built on property that meets certain criteria. Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal gives relief to Mr .
71 Clontz . Specifically , the proposal is to establish a new "T, Transitional Residential " land use
11 designation for land that meets the following criteria :
1 ) The property is currently designated AG - 1 ;
2 ) The property abuts the urban service area ; t
3 ) The property abuts a commercial/industrial node ;
4 ) The property fronts on an arterial road ;
5 ) Utility lines for both water and sewer are available at the property boundary ; and
t :
6 ) The property is at least 20 acres in size .
This new land use designation would allow land to be rezoned to a zoning district that permits
densities of up to 1 unit/acre or, if developed as a Planned Development ( PD ) , up to 3 units/acre .
Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal also includes expanding the urban service area to include T designated land .
ANALYSIS
This section includes an analysis of the alternatives , including Mr. O ' Haire ' s Transitional Area
proposal, an alternative Transitional Area proposal , and a Rural Villages proposal . This section will
also include a discussion of the alternatives ' consistency with the comprehensive plan .
ALTERNATIVES . t .
This section discusses the following three alternatives .
• Mr. O ' Haire ' s Transitional Area proposal . as presented to the Board of Countv =
Commissioners at the October 9' workshop meeting - This proposal is narrowly focused to
provide relief only for Mr. O ' Haire ' s clients .
• An alternative Transitional Area proposal - This proposal attempts to provide relief to
ated tracts of land located in fast growing areas , without
owners of agriculturally design
creating incompatibilities .
JUNE 59 2001 fie{ i I 'U F J � 3 2
- 59 -
="t ,c,4�' x: - , ; ' 'e x. r f ::w-; „v x {: . • Cls C.?.' isut '.y=^rr R ?s.,,)§': .tt r, ctY' r
r
� r" . :4x
:r o: '- ,, ,,:, axx +'� s's % fi•: : . �' z �- "N' ,-„ � :y:.; �r+�r .{ .;'.. , J � , s r,)m
': ,*rh^',.s<: �`Sn+ ' .. .' r � s ' :+¢ , x,. ua �4 # .c'
a
'
-
, . . .
� a.. r•- , $ a ., 1'�. 'r .s,„� : ..> " a 4 ?`. ,. : r '"+, ,:,. ." qy ra`5. r e. . / w +, �x� .v .,.
.< #i:., u . .'`tuy. . 1„ �` w�o-.« � � ,. ' 3 ., P.<.
,. 7x . , :. . "i . _: �' a :.. �'.x# s �•' ra A, ,., 'a �"5a ¢ r ?e°v. •rry x x-:...- n '
fid'.... 'Zss,a- �' di���^ ��."� S r"' ..SS n 'aM`'' > ,, , ;
. . - :.5, �. ;pip:�: ; � �. , . . _ � ;� x tt.#'.-:.�� � . , .f +.= �,< , v , ;-su, �, .m � ... •;a .� �:,
ae:. . :t ,..� �. >� 's'' .�-,,. :�.z a �
nnaa` r�� ... . �. _. �. .- � . , . �` .. ,..:"�P�>R�:b � &.���'.';:��tiHs :k' a.}e.?n.,�,vt't. "�,yuil�hrt,�-,:Y ,�' . G.. `� xrY.'�.'.=1
..c,....=i, . , ?,.,�,r , �ln}.�. .n�1.. , �.:'a .?»F.. ,�3 ;'�� ..^:a`�' . its', z:�~ "E`�"��':��, k�,., ,x��.�s<�,i. 't. .%.n. 7dH��'r'.^S�hF;;`.�.. .e.,•
"` � Go�rct,. ..w} .::
. x i� aR ._ s, - ... . ... .. . y>:,. . ,r s . . .� ,.rr�n I. .. -.a.�z 6;.. , . , `� " !"
[. ` :�,�, ,^ ; . , '•�" � '.aqV ,.s . ^ t. 3s f„ Fr:.,:
.... . .. . r. M. . F . . '�.,. . � ' , : . m m. t[ m• , . . .wt � v. x ( 1 ... . a. ... x va
.vu4 . g. , 2 :a . �.,� s3 «. . a #r r.. x . Axa. . ;..
. ... `� > .. , „ .: a. r. . .n . : a. 4„ .: x -. ..... t• r rn < r ,..R, x.. , . .e, , .. r ..
��. ,... „? n : v ... , d a, ..r� r. , a . �
_ . r _ _ . . _ . ... x .;t ,,. . . 4 ; . .ey r ... < C . . . m '}. , ai :. 9
a� .,.. .. a,. .. _ . , M. �. - x _ , e x,... r ;�TM .w✓.,,
'�a . . .. . �i . t5 Ty, ,. ,: z s . r».. . :..✓'� ,`l'� .: fir . . -, , n . i'
,,
., ,.. < .. , �.` s :Fr>r. 3 '��,. „�e ..$ , r;z . �i* , _ .., 's ,,3 ,, n. ."a 3 v ,,h ,... ,s
3� z3° "c , ,. . � ,y � :>'^ w�' z•.4 ,ti-.
s^
• A Rural Villages proposal This proposal is an innovative option to allow development
while preserving agncultural/rural areas .
Each of these alternatives accomplishes different objectives-- some focused on one narrow issue ,
meetings , several objectives have been mentioned,
some focused on broad policy issues . At previous
including the following :
• providing relief for Clontz;
• providing relief for similarly situated owners of small tracts of agriculturally designated land ;
• preserving active agricultural operations ;
• preserving open space and "rural " character;
• limiting conflicts and incompatibilities ;
• using existing roads more efficiently ;
• using existing water and sewer lines more efficiently ;
• using public services , such as police and fire protection , more efficiently ; and
• directing development away from flood prone areas .
When considering the alternatives , it is important to fust determine objectives . One consideration
is that, as long as the county has an urban service area boundary , there will be property owners who
wish to move it. In other words , expanding the urban service area boundary at this time will not end
disputes about its location .
Alternative 1 : Mr. O 'Haire ' s Transitional Area Proposal
The proposal presented by Mr . O' Haire is narrowly structured to include property owned by Mr.
O ' Haire ' s clients and exclude nearly all other property . This type of "piece meal" plan amendment
does not address the larger problem of small agriculturally designated tracts located at the edge of
a fast growing suburban area. In fact, because the county must treat similar parcels similarly , Mr.
generate a "domino effect" of additional land use amendment
O ' Haire ' s proposal would likely
requests . Although Mr. O' Haire ' s proposal establishes narrow criteria to differentiate his clients '
property from other similarly situated property , those criteria are illogical , arbitrary and not
substantive .
The criterion that sets a minimum size , for example , does not benefit the owners of smaller tracts
that are least suitable for agricultural use and, therefore , most in need of relief. To the contrary , the
proposal benefits only owners of large tracts of land- -those least in need of relief.
The criterion that requires that a parcel be located adjacent to a commercial/industrial node further
illustrates that the proposal is structured to provide relief only to Mr. O ' Haire ' s clients . In fact, it
is more difficult to farm, and more incompatibilities occur, where agricultural uses are near
residential uses than where agricultural uses are near commercial/industrial uses . Noise , odor and
spray drift have a greater negative impact on residences than on commercial/indusuial land that may
generate similar impacts and may operate at more compatible hours . For that reason , providing relief
to the owners of property near residential areas is more logical .
Another concern is the absence of provisions , such as required buffers , to reduce potential
incompatibilities caused by moving the urban service area boundary .
The final concern relates to the proposed allowed density . Although Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal
indicates that a density of one unit/acre is sufficient to provide relief for Mr. Clontz , the proposal
contains a provision allowing a density bonus of up to three units/acre for Planned Developments
( PDs ) . The proposal , however, contains no PD standards or criteria ; therefore, such a PD could be
developed exactly like a regular subdivision . For that reason , the purpose of including the PD
provision is not clear.
JUNE � , 2001Ta
- 60 -
F r. ,�3;;.F_ . .. : . . • } . . . . . : ....;. .. . " , a, t a"xJ+-:i-.-„* , Y .,i¢ ..,. +a� , ,,: ,
:... `�,;; .� a's �. x " a F :, ,r
�'.+„., ;.. . . , ..'L a - « .,•. w* , x.. .;,nk us ..?A=. . n ttv . es +x, , ta. . c. `x',. . ,+ -, -5
>< � , s a b '¢'a . ?` ",.. . :, azv- ,.,gt;^w '1s. ,. '., #.: $� � ,'t3-�`� ��rxC.��sy =, fzn a � 'rw'V � .
~v •• ,,.. .. , se: - t ?. .. . .. S >. ,u✓6 ., , sz 7. a,g .eC x,,. "
�, 7 r xad#,.r,. # x.r .a^C+ rx S 7 , ..... . < R.i:: s „s.. •^�. r ..:r^ti' _ ,r. c.
, }, , k „ a. fig.. , .,'
....� T , r.4-m.a bTd' asv^ ? . . a��'-� .. .Y� s t r",.2 i r fSp,2
�. 1 . , ri: . , .. u . . .. .: .. r .. ..n a , , .s
m « . .. .. . ,r �. � y.' , . r.. - A. . '. " `� , $e. � .. . . . ^. . � ° ,.r.-.+ f
., „=akrM.., �4��
. .. �r=,x: . , e" « , a,. : v ,.r,.,k by � { ...xr .�... .
,< .. ;k r`'7 . n,.. ... . s 4;`++ ." . , t _>^w^r rr;". . .. wY• 4 . .,:.. X -..e :k 5I>..a .,¥
b m .. ..: "F' .v .:.i k S=
, t s . :,,.. \, :.,.. a ,. .r _ „ ,. ,.., . ,
�` s x:,. , . 'i• ., ;,,1 'Lst ' . . rv"a . .., ,._ ,t 8 .«_. ,< ,�;'a:z. n ., ,R .,.
s
e;. :"'...`}-' y wsn : .: ' ' •. : . ,. : <b - ..: ".. R. #rt o-x` � }.-� v+ .,`%irn ,.c:-..rb %r
Y w l
a �� 3`* p .f M _ S x x , i �,::":rg r m :Rrw. ,. '.v f ... e, . �% rg � ..,..
+h�,��sx :��: y�„a
.'..,r"'e= sx >2 4 s "Sr 3, r J "'f,;, x 1 . 2 '4'
zjr I „� :.: i ., ?'* ” -� 'e � 5,.y5• :e,`,dy t kk^,k? � ���:^. .�i9 v yr'b �n�x M��£ Y`� sdt�at
:
&' zz#`S. ..J
�s: � s^^x:.= 'i ,✓. '�" � 5 r . Si ,
•,,^".. + �4 .:Sri < 'P x . xr '1 .,,„a� r .. : ,; :.,, � ��'"k •k i ;r• .
� z�.:: •� �
re .t�.15�n,
rz. A Rw . • , m. :. , . r 5 ' .. ,...
xS ,} . . . :.�:.
N rtsx>, �$ n,G". >b . , :, � w'• � =,r/m r$ 6 �` M ? x"Pxd,}. s �' xt o- w� 1� n5 ^,^..,.r
> C } . `'t` X'j�b'`s :tk ? .J^k _; .. '�� e5" . ,.$g €-zF ;w;u' �a=.� w't, w :3
�, u., � .., :.. � '� -. ^.3x. ,u » :i»✓ Ni:T _ , . r..'�' .� sou `fie°�3. �n.�»>F:,x ,rw ".�ef•�' , .:z ,¢^;,:1`„ saY. .. ,..
`k .Yi., � ,6d �. .«v,.1't . �„kss , ... i , ; ?�,tia asv .✓. >...,.,�'rrr. 7.,,. _ g ,.e� K.. �` . , .u§'�" �a . . ;� : �+r4��� � 'l�t' ;��`...3f s�iCJs
. .vs,^.�r•",,? , �s�. f.++a v��a „* . ....i
-F,_
.. ~o
M
. . . . x . ems' - w r ii . , .. : > . � . 4 , a '- . e" :�*r . , ,. . ,..::.. 3L,
: . ., o- Y•_. m 4. w , x 44� -+',5 . , . N. �G . . °"i .. .} . .� .v. . �'�`�i4 . iS'r.. « ,� . l` ,.
: :9x ,. �� � x:e,C .. . .: � .a., .>r.-. <; ; . ,. .., . .. .,..,, N4 . . �, ,.. ..R. .. . ,. t ...
aar., . "'.t ... �' >.`Y �' , ✓,. -�` . . ! t ..m, dd ,
> . . :#� . . . ' a} ::k' . :, 3*. ' k . . r . r . .i:,v`. ;. . x.. �P', . Fu;r`;' . ,., r,• .. . k
.-., d rr»:3;. _. .. x .,?. .,.a..+ur. .�... .. _ r. _- k* >:... .�.,.
,.
As structured , the proposal limits non - PD development to a maximum density of one unit/acre . Past
experience , however, indicates that development at one unit/acre or less is not feasible , especially
when water and sewer connections are involved . In fact. where a one unit/acre designation currently
exists in the county , there has been no development other than farmhouses , since the plan was
adopted . For those reasons , allowing densities of up to three units , rather than one unit per acre .
without a PD requirement is logical .
■ Affected Areas
Based on existing parcel size and configuration conditions , as well as existing water and sewer line
placement, staff has determined that this alternative currently could be applied to up to 164 . 1 acres .
Those 164 . 1 acres , shown on Attachment 4 . include the Clontz site .
There are also two other parcels that currently meet all of the proposal ' s criteria . One of those
parcels is ±76 . 8 acres in size and is located at the northeast corner of 82nd Avenue and S" Street, SW
(Rebel Road) . Extending a half a mile north of 5' Street, SW and a quarter mile east of 82' Avenue .
that parcel is owned by Beuttell Development, Inc . In January , 2000 . Beuttell Development ,
represented by Mr. O ' Haire , applied for a comprehensive plan future land use designation map
amendment to redesignate its property to L- 1 , Low - Density Residential - 1 ( up to 3 units/acre ) . That
request was withdrawn after the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend
denial .
The other parcel that meets the proposal ' s criteria is X6 . 5 acres in size and is located at the northeast
corner of 13 " Street, SW ( Kelly Road ) and 74" Avenue (Range Line Road ) .
■ Summary of Alternative 1
Mr. O' Haire ' s proposal, as structured, provides relief almost exclusively to his clients ( Mr. Clontz
and Mr. Beuttell ) . Alternative 1 ' s criteria for inclusion in the urban service area are illogical, non -
substantive , and arbitrary . While other properties may be more difficult to farm, and other property
owners may have a greater need for relief. they would not qualify for such relief under the proposal ' s
narrow criteria. Furthermore , it is reasonable to assume that the proposal would start a "domino
effect" by encouraging the owners of similarly situated land to apply for land use amendments .
Alternative 2 : Staff' s Transitional Area Proposal
,
As drafted , this proposal would add significantly more land to the urban service area than Alternative
1 . That fact, however, is balanced by the recognition that if Alternative 1 is adopted, then eventually
entire corridors along roads that serve as urban service area boundaries will be redesignated . Rather
than spending several vears constantly processing plan amendment requests from each of those
property owners , Alternative 2 proposes one large plan amendment.
Additionally , this proposal is structured to achieve the following four objectives :
• Provide relief for Mr. Clontz ;
• Provide relief for owners of agriculturally designated land located adjacent to fast growing
areas ;
• Limit the conversion of agricultural/rural land to urban land ; and
• Limit incompatibilities .
To those ends, this proposal incorporates Mr. O ' Haire ' s idea of a new T, Transitional Residential ,
land use designation, but with significant revisions . This T designation would apply only to land that
meets all of the following criteria :
71
JUNE 59 2001 „
IV -
- 61 -
..}'
. .,✓r'+- ,; , a ., . ., . ,1:, .} .,.. ,->, n .: . . . A y.a: s , . m, .. .:x . a .-.c 5 ., .. c
s-.x x ,2� . r. . .. r,� ..,t s .+� r, d .:. -, ,,. �i.4�`.:.a. m�;Ye, . '� ,F 4 <. < .1 . a�.r:,.
.. „ -::-w.N� s,'. :: ' . , ... a . . . asex - ... '~4 .ksz's.=,=_ .Z` . ., R . n # y>fi d S . L �3
. Y. .x � �` 8 .*.� :'r 3 •. :'�"�-
�.,, ,. >r , . . "'�°; ,. . , - . .. . -E > t f„ . ,c.A s ,:. � . .y.. 4 . .,:; t a
4 .tr , �.s �. ,:✓ .� ',. : �,. '49 x5�ry € � :�r« . �r.. rx � . . : > $e ,. = . � ar��. . '-�L,. .� �.
r5R`...' ,,. ... l+ ys4 . )' .. • . � > .x L T:.: .x as« Lw. .j q
, . .. ,, . >r ,...,. , ... i .. > . - . . ., , . . . M' r ,., a 4 _. rv.. k"•� I :.Q v f #
'fitu �) fi. �,_,. +, a ^�. � 'n
.. s. - �... . *,;. . . .. „ . . ,. . ., a."�� >� n`C- .r`s;>„f Xu >c �„ rfrt, `�>•. , - �,. '' '
z,;- w < . ;aw :... . '�' pr .Ec- x -g Y. . , �ry 5 . .,, . �”` r' x„
. C^ -
f ,.:• s :.,u.� :fir `` �. .,d:. _ � � .,
� .. r.-c`'hc. x ?:t er >..�f,o , X'y .. ,r?s.s.,t:c ;:.�.r�,»4f:�'e°.xaZ,,i, h„ zu ` i,v,z...�in�+.�-Y�.��w
:��e�''�!�+3�6� .x'�'e:.e. . � ;�. .e
m... ,x .. F- ... .. -. �. . t .. . . �
.. .� ,- . ... . . . .
t. , ra" .. ., : y . , , .�. t' � < . «:���, m%.. ,.e:r, - a :, 8.�', t. . . . ,s „'•r_a x., , +zK.c_3s
t «. 3Y <�"� ra , d4 wx .
„�+'i.„. ; :s � , •. . .c '' , ,:, 5. . .- .,r�, ,w . . .. a,. S � . ., r
_ .: , . .. ., F . ,... n. .. ,. ... . .. ra , 'eS; ... .oq •«. .... ,
r � .t^. �s'e'", , r&
y,. . # v„ .#,, . ....
,r:. :aY,«. t �
r„ <, w.. .,. ,.. . .. . r c ,e;. - s r .. x,. .,.., .., .. z .^' �``i <...,. s :,� 5 , .�„ fi
:,:° „ '� , � 'ur i,.• .a g"es t�.3:"a" ^y.i�-.Y�-rou„` � `3 :,K
< a ` :r
t . ,. u �5 � ��ks"
.i. . .,. a . C"°%, .
wr
<
• the site is currently outside the USA ;
• the site is within a quarter mile of an arterial road that currently serves as an urban service
area boundary , and contains both water and sewer lines (these characteristics indicate that
the site is in a fast growing area with urban services currently available ) ;
• the site is located south of SR 60 and east of 82"d Avenue (this fast growing area has been
the focus of previous meetings ) .
The proposal includes expanding the urban service area to include T designated land. After the land
use amendment becomes effective , T designated land would be eligible to be rezoned to only two
zoning districts : PD , Planned Development, or a new TRAN-3 , Transitional Residential District ( up
to 3 units/acre ) . At the land owner ' s discretion , T designated land may remain zoned A- 1 , or be
rezoned to PD or TRAN-3 . Except for certain regulations discussed in this staff report, the new
TRAN- 3 zoning district would mirror the existing RS - 3 zoning district. ell
The maximum density within the T land use designation would be three units/acre, generally the
same density designation as nearby land already within the urban service area . That is an urban
density , and is appropriate for land within the urban service area.
The proposal includes the following three provisions to mitigate and reduce potential impacts
between residential and agricultural uses :
• Residential projects on T designated land must provide a 300 foot wide (or up to 25 % of
project area width, whichever is less ) , Type A buffer where the project abuts , or is across
right-of- way from, an agricultural land use designation . The Type A buffer is the county ' s
densest vegetative buffer. This setback and buffer will somewhat mitigate agricultural
impacts such as noise , odor, and spray drift.
• Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants will be prohibited on T designated land.
Buyers of platted lots in residential projects on T designated land must be notified of the
Florida Right to Farm Act, and that active agricultural operations occur nearby .
Although these measures will probably not totally eliminate incompatibilities, they can significantly
decrease them. These measures are intended to address the primary reasons for which people who
own land located outside of, but near, the urban service area claim they need relief. Thus , if these
measures are implemented, a domino effect of additional land use amendment requests is unlikely .
■ Affected Areas
Based on existing and planned water and sewer line placement, staff has determined that thisell
alternative currently applies to approximately 892 acres , including the Clontz site . Those acres are
shown on Attachment 6 and are located in the following three groups :
• 412 acres located on the west side of 58`h Avenue , between the Main Canal and 9`h Street.
SW ; ell
• 400 acres located on the east side of 82nd Avenue, between 16`d Street and 5' Street, SW ; and
• 80 acres located on the east side of 74' Avenue , between 9' Street, SW and 13" Street, SW .
Additional land could be added as more water and sewer lines are constructed .
JUNE 512001 `
- 62 -
r '. x,`x 7ca
}� v. „.:,; ' r ,s. . ..:-,. s�. : . ..yr•, :, .e.- ' a_<, t *.,
� =4^, :. "�`, , . .,. dr � ✓ >E �-. - _ ..,. .5 . . ..,. z , ✓ a, :�:. ...,r ,?F. a ..... .- r
t :�.: L.r, :D' , s ✓.. ,y e«;:g-.. u . ^^. ^=ws r ;x '4 .J�F> .k -:t: F -.
g2 }
.r.'.e . ,a+.4 � .�`.�?. ;r *x�r , "_
v ' : x 3 .. ., ,. � .. . . . s - ;a '•.n.. < _.y .<„ ,t k- .. . #
»' R. . ... > ... € ,+ # '. _+ �? r .:.,:: , . ..5 n ,w, #r. ..
iz ,�#r-Y ,. - ,. ._. , .. _. ¢ ,.h. ,.: .., x' !r +3x.,:.. v'' -., « s ...-,h xs 1 t
1+ a :,
r 9x�€ <...: „ ,._ �,. u, . .,. @x<. . . .". Uk. ;• s :G--,: �t ♦ ., .. A� a6e, z. K. mss,€
o- t 1 . r x :s r �, .;., ,Ye ,.... u„ e .�r, k_ •^,'3 . . k >ri
„ +. . . . #;. .. ,: r ..,, : `A „� rt $r, k-.. . ' >C' H5 8 .. ..,:.. �'+, , ,::rf s'h, `# `
, , ' . , , rs.s :, 'C` ti. =�.., x. ; 5{ Sx ,.3-v*; !' '
5... s t +', k.. i
ti
u. r ....as., t ,. ,y -.x:,..: ,� 'T:.. � g30' "} " 4� . E`ti:"r;"' ` " d'�� r•.:a.
.
x �.. . ,,t " . .�� . r: ., + .^'i 4. t ..< 1 ,t?>::=a .%e . . .c,s,.. ." 'r' '.
'i's . k. .< . r . .... r . :K '4
'rK. t^,.x� - � ". .z s ., e : ..,, .- 'b� "�„ lti... z .*,.:.r:� r £. . . ; ,""' k + .: ..�` + x ,r
�s ,•xrrS,K ,., . s _ ,�`.+; �.. , , ` Gi' '' '' S: t " `' . . . .. ... s . . :.,t'
*rs Y'i.,-., . .�t ... . `', �:'•�#1� x fix .. „�;. �4 A' t . :• '7' ,.:zc.« 5 .,
.,. �, "
.,
, * ^!">#^i ,u.;'�
,_y. , ,„: . . . :.s
::e. �. .„,,.. , wa
i ,y,, ad ;x..> .::: �:: ,r:{f S e .., .;� , y
/.,.�' ..�� �{�. iEt� � - 3u L ,Ym �.:..r5s_ tsF�R"TL < f. r,. _. ri� ns. ,,. < Ax� � t�,?.� .4x".mrtih.��
*4 3 S •1 _
s"_r > d ...x-.w.
b. e Y ,a.' .. b .. .-. „.
4 ae. . k . :. ,., ;e .'. . ^d..]S'a.. _. � .: .✓, vr: .,. . . ;�. ., { s _ .t* � s .4v. . , ,....
.x�F. ,y... P r, ^�
,...> n .,- N sq � . .a. .. t 3x..
,, fi.. t ,.. , >< _ . .i.. a x , .. ' ,s .
k" /.,- ..:^ � . u. _ .a,, e _ . , , . . MY .. , , � r$, . .
,. � Y < . ,� �. k, a ,', ,a $
"w. . a .. "�,34,: ...a 7.
Y.1A.. .," rl# .e ��y�#aa a v§ l 3�{ n . !} : . . ,. ... ,* .,:..T3, ft 't_ .. .v � .:v v-,Fx ..
�• v ,
}}:: }1h . lY
",�2.
vr' ...t... :. , +�" : - . . w z•�Fde• ,¢'�f ,. .:,. .. v ,�� m, r " r .:N rry r . „,,. e _,a;e, r ..
. .i ..�:. ,. . .. : . ,. cy . , .. ,. . £W , fi .>. fin. : ..e.,� , #�, '1`b� nh .. . Ga � +:a#;t y t:ti{v;: �':
A,. x + -
+` r.. . +..„r; r . ,. a 3 ,nx, -:., '�' ., . `. +v, f fin. ... �R # s ab s aat + .. +3 ., ..F x . . ✓'•a;,»: 'Y
,m~•r:v:+ P ,,. . �. _ x .., . . � µ'�. J�n k S �
}, Yr;• k. - ,. ., .r`'+ri. T , i.xa�. .rt s�” ,. . eS, rt . s -s .,. ^'n i s . R u .TY h JS. :a.f' +,
4 .._z .§. r ,. . �" . .ro` 'u .. . ..£ "4 ..R n. .... . ...:+ . ' ay�.lE= � ul lil4C,
I
� ,
'n sf x,z :•,r { A-§ i
IVI
,rT � 5 �..
e "
e
E ,
i
r Alternative 3 : Rural Villages
This is an innovative approach that is being discussed and may be implemented in several counties
in Florida. This alternative is similar in many ways to two concepts already found in the
comprehensive plan . Those concepts are Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND ) projects and New
Town projects . Pointe West, currently under construction near 16 `° Street and 74” Avenue , is an
example of a TND project. TNDs are intended to be pedestrian friendly , mixed use communities .
TNDs, however, require that a least a portion of the project area be located within the urban service
area . In contrast, New Towns are generally much larger and must be located entirely outside the
urban service area.
As with Alternative '_' , this alternative involves the creation of a new land use designation and a nea
zoning district . As proposed, projects approved as Rural Villages would be located entirely outside
the urban service area with a minimum separation distance from the urban service area .
This is essentially a compact. higher density project implemented through a Transfer of Development
Rights ( TDR ) program . Any TDR program must have a sending area and a receiving area . A
conservation easement would be placed over sending areas to ensure that the sending areas could not
be developed . The receiving area would be the rural village . These areas would be compact and
small . They would be developed as TND projects to ensure compactness and to limit impacts on
surrounding areas . Although the specific rules have not been determined, rural villages would have
to meet certain requirements, such as the following :
• the village area must contain a minimum of 200 acres ;
• there must be five times as many sending ( open space) acres as village acres ;
All
• project streets must be designed to accommodate and promote pedestrian and bicycle trips ,
as well as automobiles ;
• the project must contain a mix of residential , retail , office , and institutional uses ;
• the residential density of the village area must be at least 6 units/acre .
This type of development can preserve agriculture , open space , and natural habitat . The TDR and
open space requirements can create a greenbelt, lower initial infrastructure costs , and facilitate the
efficient delivery of public services . Perhaps more importantly, this type of development pattern can
preserve the rural character of the area and promote community identity .
This type of development, however, can be difficult to implement . The Rural Villages concept is
likely to require significant land consolidation as well as the transfer and purchase of a great deal of
development rights . As envisioned , the consolidation of land. as well as the sale and purchase of
development rights would be through the private sector and would not involve the government . For
those reasons , patience and cooperation among multiple land owners would be required .
If this alternative is chosen, actual plan amendment language must be developed . For that reason ,
if this alternative is chosen it must be processed with plan amendments submitted during the July
2001 plan amendment submittal window .
Consistenev with the Comprehensive Plan
Staff reviews each comprehensive plan amendment request for consistency with all applicable
policies of the comprehensive plan . As per Section 800 . 07 ( 1 ) of the county code ,
the
"comprehensive plan may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of
the plan pursuant to Section 163 . 3177 ( 2 ) F. S .
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the
JUNE 59 2001 f ;
- 63 -
�
ca ., . .o,:.. # ' . � . . -.. ::a s" arkg . .,2.,ay:t^ r wa,:.c,, „,t N> . ?trt .7` .,S'' , z' ,., ., ., w
:r :,;s � , -' r na4 t :g v, k - x, t % a fi : s5�'f.-'t^".,ss �'. =;5•, e
q k � , .y . >- m � �.. —s�� 5, .,-:. :� n ' ; . .r, 'w . � ;R S ,, TM,dv *u "✓; . ,:�^ x .. � _;"{"
'�' an r s > '"`s .�.. sa �M,^� ,,. "Y� , an+,„.. ”; .f
5 . ,,:�' Yf' ,. .. .A^ ;,._ . .. .7,r�r ".' . , ,.uLy.-. ✓� . ,,.�+. y�'j , ..[4;: zM ':.> 'xr T'r ;':.W � .;
`$ai'... at alas. . .; k::.., $aYr '{�' .,.:, s �' �" x6 ,:. ka.a`�" N- :s 'C,t't7r , .e. :�d 3 `> �s ,s " €' 1
8 D...
�"+`�',. ..a: :c . ,. a _. „� .� _. : . , a ^iz .... z. n''f .: .� x . _ .., ,: .� taA. b.:: >a,:s:.,
su . v cb �.:;.. m � . ✓ u ,.. � � `�.. .. � ,.<. ��' • ,�„ .. .: r�-L `P ,r l - �
. ,,. S� 0 a. . . 'u . ,+ e v.. T'i,:. .:r. x.OF Y[ F .. ,,. t � ... . ^S vmke .fi-'..Y :h
, .. . 1 ... e.>. A . . .. v1 L ,.6 d•' d' H, . ., 4 , arx f
„nn ,.. ;,^�'vk•. 1. 9 x ? s .. ,� 4 "a's a :.:. 5 v }c .x k- " *, Y .+., xT �-k3 n
�x . .v- a, '9�i� ru'`t� <�+�' ,fib .fl' .�,t: 1, , 4` t�'
rC+,: . ,_". +*,`tee,• r �r x ,.. . "'.s5. >; ,.:. -'. S t �;. say. .. :, ;R.,x k
r
f.....�. c,ku. . . � . L:€��.. .� rm.'"F�._ .[. r�s�xv2:a ld. ...�:�'vr_: ... .`+Cnsx, a,r. . .� _ , aS ax. " . , ._ .l_ z.. :, .,. wa <.: .,. ,..
.. ... .<, . . . , .. . ,. „ » ., .. _. ,, � , .> - ....0 . ._ W . w_ .>_ .. .>„a.- ._.. , ,. +r x...,r_ .+ . _.r.h,�.. . i➢, „�.'�
,�... k.•.,_, . , . ,.�._ , r ,.
. . . . . . wiF .. � .a A` . , .. * .V..b, i.:n tF -::.f 3 G* ..,•.. ,k , y... 3 ..x . .. t.:. 4J u4
"Y .r .�' '. ✓S r{
c. . ..,Y r 1. . n - x .. , . _� .yM .., " e a.. F
: �..�}'. r .tlw f r :n».Ja �� ... . ., v+., ..Fh - • q'H
W"
. fn r.- <4:a ' �Y ,.. . : r , i v.4 . ✓.w.. .h 4xx . ,:. .,a, h .. .,...( m »a. ...... Y� � $. ":§ i
h �^.,." .. .. ,4t # "k" ... 5 . ..E,. o-A .. +, _a.. 4 v s .. . ,., r . :,. . Mn 1^„ ,.'. E } ,„mr
'a .,.:,1 5 .'-nr'a a r ., .,•z� G .k�-; n ,*y.,. ix , r�
tP�Z � ^,; .3 . ..i' ., . r ..a.. �.: . „ ;� e ro � ,b r , „r � � fr c✓'tv .5> C a k t �'4
„''4o- Y' '4r F x � "�° .1p,'+;� fw r � ,E�'S�Ym
r
community ' s development. As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
basis for all county land development related decisions -- including plan amendment decisions .
T While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in
reviewing plan amendment requests . Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 , however, is applicable
to all plan amendment requests . For that reason, this section will begin with a discussion of how the
proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
■ Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3
In evaluating any comprehensive plan text amendment request, the most important consideration is
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that at least one of three criteria be met
in order to approve a comprehensive plan text amendment. These criteria are :
• the proposed amendment corrects a mistake in the approved plan ;
• the proposed amendment corrects an oversight in the approved plan ; or
• the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances .
In this instance , each of the alternatives meet Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 's second
criterion , the proposed amendment corrects an oversight. That oversight is related to the
development of agriculturally designated lands located close to major roads that serve as urban
service area boundaries , where the right-of- way of those roads contain , or are planned to contain ,
utility lines . Recognizing the potential expansion of the urban service area to include those lands ,
the county should have a policy in place to determine the land use designation of those properties
if the urban service area is expanded to include those areas .
Although they differ on the specifics , both the O ' Haire and the Staff Proposals indicate that a new
T, Transitional Residential, designation is the appropriate land use designation for those lands .
Although the Rural Villages Option does not determine the land use designation of those lands , it
does provide an alternative to urban service area expansion .
For those reasons , each of the alternatives is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Consistency Summary
As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared each alternative to all applicable objectives and
policies in the plan and found no conflicts . Therefore , each alternative is consistent with the
comprehensive plan .
CONCLUSION
Alternative 2 comes the closest to meeting all of the Board ' s objectives , including providing relief
to Mr. Clontz . By also providing relief to similarly situated properties , it is fair. In contrast,
Alternative 1 is arbitrary and illogical . Alternative 2 contains special provisions to limit conflicts ,
incompatibilities , and impacts on active agricultural operations . Alternative I contains no such
provisions . Staff supports Alternative 2 .
As has been noted in previous staff reports , the Board now has an opportunity to significantly
influence the development pattern in the south paof the county , between 58 `” Avenue and 82nd
n
Avenue . The Board can use that influence to implement a pattern that promotes compatibility ,
efficient service delivery , and agricultural preservation : or the Board can dive up that influence and
allow a sprawl type development pattern . Due to state law, a sprawl allowance decision now would
be extremely expensive to change in the future .
JUNE 59 2001 Big o �
- 64 -
} .c4 ,r,a'y^ ;"s . ' k 'gv'•aW°-' R`q' .e,r�i'{,. .:y va :. a,
}e. Yr- Ate • ' x"`4 tn .x+; . a .. K x ,�t s <,.- r, ^,'
�`, r
5 X .. r 3 E 5; 3 Y Y :',k 5 t✓ a,t xY e*`t h ;�,
.:, 'x"...�v:.J .�v t , . r"i' �,f�4.-.,x ..... ...r.< . ..t . .. S�,'• . ... .. r W. ...,.. .., ,: . r -. ,...
.v_ .., ,rz. '�. _ f r.:.:a J?s 3, . u�: { v'Ls?.+t r:- ,a t , v' s
..
x^L^. . . :s 3 . .. W . ,. M1 , ... ry . w r• ... u. .. . ._ ,.,. . r - t ,..: .,. i" .G _ r '.. :,, .
._Y n , � �. ...: ryry.. . . . - „',Ii_ w .. .. . . a d.. v : .„ $'. SS �.. 5*
, . . :.�f ... .fin Ke... , : rv. .� . ”. ,- . £ r,.5 .� . « t r . ., . .vi. 0 n $ .
1. r .. -F. ,. F; y:«... c. 1:. . -,. . ':s -= . ,'�- 1 fir' •k
,. . .T. ,. n. .r. (�*. . v,. �4 , xv . 4c. ,.. .. .. : v`-: ,,.� r .%,.,y .. s"5§.... .-.. m .,s,, no .i, ✓ ra. .. ::: -:n:.
x ..<.. ,: § , r. -.54� , Yr¢ l .: � s U. ..
n:: . v8 R" .-�°.+. r, -,S;;. wad , .,.�.,%✓r �k-.. ,..: �a e, a sap 1:... .::.: "v, ,.., s m ,'?Y
k ,-, t'ian�} >a xir ;.. . xt'.. .� , v 5r .,v '?'' �h ..�5, s` ..
:, m
t'. .
Y' : I:K 4 zu.... . 'T \ . 5 ,W3 y-..P + ✓ 4. , - :, . � ,< ri ... �^ b , Y...:
R.+, ri '{. xj. i'-
kM � . ., ,. �.;,• :a. : � � .o'�� ,ti: . ,r. . .< .. ::. , : :... �;.� , , . .:., . - t,- r ,x. ;; e �,,.
, . � 3^.s-.. Ys &, z � r ,. r
a �.1- __,
..p
,'k,e `4' t .
4 5�,•`:� �+,-` y
a rv . m�t§a :, , : . -:< � .• - at r ,., . . . �a-a. ... .. v-d .�:? a .**:. 5 .r>sX o- . ,. .r''",. ;;• ? 0.�
7a.. . b ^.. ,Cx 4 r .>., 4 � '.x. .-* t ,via , . 1" 2. ! nu#' ..
3„As... . � k, W3s,:.„ v,.�..��. 'xo._
d"2 ri = v r .:.ry � � r ., . . 5 3( t "v ✓ , ,. :':a e , . .. . .,._ . .. Y 4 4P:
$ ^_r..T . . {
A-
.
a . .. . . .^ . .r•, , . . - . . 9 . : .:h. , . . ,.c .4 : . n 't, F. t,+c, . s n
�
., .3Y' a+ . .c . �," . .. -.. . .d, . .�, .i, :. . .:. .v ., - ,� .. �, x;'? � ':;::. � , .;t i :,�,
. ,n '' ,.. >xx 'ai:" . J ;x : .: .xa. . y , .�.• a � -3 € 4�
, atr . . . .. , . k, + . ��� .`' *1� ,.. .���� a+�.. -T` _ , .., yA*, „•„ :'.: .� „ .:;, r : .s':'rbi
n :� 'rY^'r . > ., K4d, a „3i,. f� r.. 'rA' x"' �.- .
�" rurr ->•r z wr+ t fi k � � -# t .'.:•< '" �, x y , ^,t a �... .� ;4 , . [.
yH�L 3� �°"."3'' ��'-'�`rt4n r �c�.,,u 2�
. "..�. f `�
sx -, �, ...,.
€ t '
t
,
f ,
With Alternative 3 , the Rural Villages option , the Board has the opportunity to implement a
permanent solution . Although , compared to Alternatives 1 and 2 , this option takes longer and is
more difficult to implement, it also comes close to meeting all of the Board ' s objectives . Through
the transfer of development rights , the Rural Villages alternative could provide relief to Mr. Clontz
and to all similarly situated parcels . If properly designed, rural villages can preserve open space and
active agricultural operations, and reduce incompatibilities . Additionally , the compact design of F ,
Rural Villages allows more efficient provision of public services . Perhaps more significantly , the
Rural Villages option can preserve the rural character and community identity of an area .
It is important to note that there is no single perfect land use pattern that implements all
comprehensive plan policies ; eliminates all incompatibilities ; efficiently uses land, infrastructure ,
and public services ; provides "relief ' to Clontz and other similarly situated property owners : and
preserves agricultural resources , natural habitat, and open space . In fact, several land use scenarios
may achieve some or all of those goals . Regardless of what land use pattern the Board chooses ,
however, land use disputes will not be eliminated. Moving land use designation boundary lines may
reduce incompatibilities . but it will not eliminate them. With that in mind, several alternatives have
been presented. Attachment 7 , Summary of Alternatives . describes each alternative and summarizes
the advantages and disadvantages associated with each alternative .
If the Board chooses Alternative 2 ( Staffs Transitional Residential land use designation ) , there
appears to be consensus that such land should be located along arterial roads that serve as urban
service area boundaries and contain both water and sewer lines within the road right -of- way . The
Board, however, is not limited to the alternatives presented . If the Board decides to create a
Transitional land use designation , it can choose whether or not to use the criteria used in Alternative
1 , Alternative 2, some combination of those alternatives . or some other criteria. If the Board chooses
to create a new land use designation , then the Board must make a decision regarding each of the
following variables :
• Location - Should the new land use designation be limited to land south of SR 60 ? This is
1
the fast growing area that previously has been the primary focus of discussion .
• Density - What should be the maximum density permitted within the new land use
designation ? Although both one unit/acre and three units/acre have been proposed , past
experience indicates that one unit/acre is not feasible to develop .
• Depth - How far from the arterial road should the new land use designation extend '
Generally , utilities are considered available to properties within a quarter mile of a line . r
• Abuttins Designation - Should the new land use designation be required to abut C/I
designated land ? The need for a Transitional land use designation is greater for farms that ki
abut residences than for farms that abut C/I uses .
• Buffer Width - Should a buffer be required where the new land use designation abuts
agriculturally designated land, and if so , what type and how wide ? A wide , dense buffer is
beneficial to mitigate potential agricultural/residential incompatibilities .
• Caribbean Fruit Flv Host Plants - Should these be prohibited within the new land use
designation ? These plants are currently prohibited in new subdivisions that are adjacent to
citrus groves , both inside and outside the urban service area.
• Notification Requirements - Within the new land use designation , should developers be
required to notify lot buyers about surrounding uses and the Florida Right to Farm Act ? The
county has a similar requirement for new development near airports . This may reduce
incompatibilities .
JUNE 59 2001 nK i I U, P '4 8
1 .
- 65 -
w>flr
„'
f++ v 'Z r r`Lr +,¢ , /a a
.. . . v. . . . 5' M —. . r.... ,. 5"9 .,� i ,..i. s,e::. ' , _ Ya ^u en } ( v I }' >.:: L
Wil• `: ;, X G ht Y' �' t �� ,, y't; a � 'e M , `vYxy
x - �.z a. .r
#. .: � w,a x✓✓tr ,li'.:. „r,.;vnA
..✓... ,. aY . ®- ,., _ #"' xa ..:� *r Y`nY+ . . . . 3 ,. , ? . , ,z v, . �2,., ,.,.>. : ., t ... i=
.). . s.. ni ,.,.. x .'es . . , ,,. ,.. . . Y rs .. . AS .r* a .,.M: a , :!
>v. . . . , . .+ , ' r.�`Yu- . .� ..,... . r . m,� r c'�, ,. < c:a_: .: •., r., 1 . >:, r . ... x , .:-,xf
A, ,. .a c 1 .r .,.> . . , . F> : r„ w F s 'r t.:._ 3c'' . .k<.
+�, . .. ..:,�,. . , � .: fir - „. , . . . 5 . . .. ,; ,x .. ,v.�' ,Y".",fi. , . x �.r• ,. x±'' . ..
'.. ~•<,, : : � `� -. - ;:, 4 , x
x,,. . ,. a. . �':: , . ,. . .. . . x -. �' .::'�. ... x ,. , ,..: s : 'a, .. +r ✓' t R';x
� P e, yP*'.. � S2 f � €. . �Y t� - x',. � ;Sti+^i"�^. . � . . cr :+ r`. "�3 x N-p,r.y,: s '
"�+, n(8: ..� �✓,, nV. . a .. . .. ,.. , . . . :> . � ,.: +X''` � v, ,", ,, E,.: ,,,..,,, n r , ,s.. , '� "a>
xY:* ; 'a r s exr '�' , >a* � .. :;,w '+..,m`t k t !:.- �' ° x�t' „ t x ',�.,. . e r
ra. .._ . :. . ,. ,r, �� � : . " '�������.x . .J; �. „„ ,.: a.. �:., t . ,... rt a t. .) r�
}n � x ,..r;' , .::,. r vJA .,r r .� ,^5' �+r a•
. .. .._:, R .. _ . V .. .a z`;. '. .�.. .., ui r.a } '.::.:. :` l � . ;:. � >Y' ..,. '✓;. xry .' .
', rt h -0 i;: ?e i F . . . '�- s 3 5.n:, < 5 gYl.� ., '. :*M v d S �:-3nt R .'k
v. . ...z-. ,. . . .., ..� . . .. , 'a•`F i� .,-w.s, �S � 'E , . ,... Y .,. �. . ,.. Mn.. v: .._;..
. .. ;:a, , , ,... . c �.,... .,..:. . .;. ..4 . 7.� '.k a
¢ .. . .v. A...., . 4. . , . . . .,,m. a . .. 4 T'+ . „.. , .. },. . v t . { , . . "•':+ a .. . .,e ,
. ,� r m,. .. + ,� .;=.+C: by e �'n �;i i `Sr �'^'^.3. i=Yd ,: :,` F cy taa:` a,."s 5 �'�`,v ,"4.
y,. . ...n. . . 't. . . . Fw.. .. .�f, p . . ✓- ter. r: r . . ..r 4
.. , , ... . _, .,�m,., • .k- . . mss°' .,: r ; , , nKX r . .. _ �._ e -
. . �i � : . ., e. + 4. i fi =.. .« . ,.. : 1' } }^,. . .,., + . .. ., , { �.,,.. i :. � .,,,, '4= L.J ...
., t! .,. Y .f'.�r)}` F >` s � ,. . C+':gib. f+ i. �'ra:`'7ti• a .. fi-” s
-
� .. , � , . x. ,n 3... . . i .•^,,. . _ ,..., s . ,,.. 2 a'g. .t:r ,, .' ,w a,. x.; ,:. .; . ,, t a
'-:- :x.*a �e... x f z . .ar,: .'^` R. :1. �. 4:. � .< 'rv, rN' ."E. #n;
>�,., +r.Y..a v u. . , ,. . .. � Y2r-«R . ..� , ya :a .,. . , v t , .:.:,,,: 5 , ,w::x, . . ; , c." : ,: .
. .. , , . s. . 4 ✓ s .. 3`; , :+ .. "s 26 6 : 3 ✓ 'r Y++
r ,... . , , . .+. . , ., a `t.,^+.,. .w . ,, ., .. . -t . _ .:: .+ ._� v 1 a,♦ , , 3 , a^ _ . .
, ,.....: e . r. r. F � "'-::', sx � k-., 3 ,d a 3 ^�};f '� a e :,°.s.-i x ,+ p ,!# 'Ct
'm �� 3t.'�°+a,.' xs ... a. ,. � �;, ,w .r . ,;r ; ..r:. �'r.� j �... ,,.a 'S ...,.:.- s,.r:t v = , - b � _
t,;., y.> s .v a yt ..,k" . it � •y i'`v5,,;: }° ">�z . rv .;?k k.,>°att#i�r st �t = R �
�v
1, s
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Professional Services Advisory Committee recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners transmit Alternative 2 , Staff s Transitional Residential land use designation
proposal , to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for its review . .<
MR. O ' HAIRE ' S OCTOBER 9120009 PROPOSAL TO THE 1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
GERALD CLONTZ
RS - I or RFD (existing districts , rural single -family , rural fringe development ) 1 unit per acre «
w/PD bonus of 3 units .
• Property must abut Urban Service Area
• Property must abut Commercial/Industrial Node
• Property must front on arterial road
• Utilities - water and sewer - must be available at the property boundary
G _
• Minimum acreage - 20
Alternative 1 : O ' Haire Proposal
t.,
R
l
CR 51
77th St.
SL
SR 60
s
••
�O
P y
Areas in red indicate T designated lands
JUNE 512001 y
- 66 -
'fv Y 9 e. P; .. `.a r9
t
.: 6x e x , «r 1 .. -r > k r ,
= ,.:. >3 . .:.t -_. , rv , . , .-t :..:,r x.rr r '' ! { rt"
.n� x .. ,. . , rr „r. . . .a + , , . , " s `wn " s ^y s 'r
a "„}. . n f :« v �. s3"r „+,.r 5! µ sh 1r , .-..:+ ✓.f t } {,l 3 : i xavh%' x x ✓
<
{ a ”' { !s x M. . .. ... kF, .., : ::. S : � ., . x e : � 5 „� dH ,. �.... 1(
Y ,tS ..✓ { Y t�, �f �,.
3.., w*n a,.:'-, x_, .o. s . .: f. ... . ..; (� �'�... ..: 4 K :c:3: T t4 .'t.:
. •'-.p+f Y2k . 3.:. R
.„ N .a.:ry ��" 1 :: ^H :. ' . .- a. � . t } y. : n. s Hn.W. rve,Y SLJV ... � C:.�..F.;N S 9Y a ' ➢ A .r„ f
;i 3 ..vv k �4:..• . A': $ le 5 ....ii : t .':4 .. S'N .�".ab� ;,k � � u.
.+�. . .: ., � � - o-' �".^'x>.a,,��ww� �, ��wtt 3. . ,. .:`.r,. , i .r., .. . s. -. r:. , ,. _s 1< d v.....
-r r s ..:?..,o- x �,.... .,, . •x .r `< . Svr x ra:. �t L .,;§�,tw x �+ <# '+c� � �
,. >gp,.. ,. >• „ c « - .es d,G% , a >. a ... 3w`�, a . , . . . , . ey.,.. �" ,, i S » !s , rl 2 {c ..
.r;; v3 '- � �.^ e . :.. 'C+ rnci', a ani 4?' v, �" �*+a. asx � sX '"' a '[
'�" ,, a !b'ry „. ' u , ;> . - , ,. r3 tar . .. .. , , ... . �. :., s . .aa, a �... .:. .. :.'+.
, . , , ,. a z � w; .{w ".; d. nC s"i:"'= 2+s 'S dd . ,✓�^� y.R . -.max . ° .,... i, g,.N �
� � '` � ,. 3w,�" e.=: r -$.. '' ,S'��� {n ,..'"i`"�w wt-,.. ;�y ..
. ;r ;' .... Yt� .. sa. . ^.. :ri: , ✓ z .,+ ;:'. , i . ,:. <« ^.0 .� . t. rt ?" . {: A ¢-.r'F�S
°
� . .... r x ,kr :fie,` _ . . x ..f f:. 'Et c . .. w.. ., R. _ .. ...c , fr . .w' _. - ..:, .<. . .. 1 ;;¢
`✓ ...s. .:, ,h . ..t +,*' b .«nz `s
ky{.
Vr -
.. «�, „ Q:.ux.:?�$��.c�"rE�.u`��"t,.a 3'1Sr. � �x, L;�.;z?<+3'.¢rf.: ��<..>:+.$'�sa>�". r-S � .. ✓ - ., 4 � t . 1 rv . . e..+,..
, . . r .-. ., a. .v � ,�,.. > ,.y , w 3a u .,� .F t _ (l.;,rv� , ? . �,i a- c3, . , , na>SPF �.�wf".'z"s.'�'���Rs.'' �., h « ,
.: $i Y . ' ��; "'^ r.
x
Y L < l Y
9,
1
4
nx
L
9 ir'} Y 11
CS 1 $?
it tea § r 2
zlf� 11
... {' .
tLf ! .f'
Y *� t;�'
}rk'I1'1
.3 N s N
mf s,k
xqi
� wile Z68 snSJDA sa1al'. I ' lNl
Ak Puel ueym til puel Ju uoislanuoa Suwil ,( lue.10(luwy
NOI .LVAHA", Nd ' IVNII.L'1 [D1 )L) V
II aunu uila lou Saop ' auy dmpumxJ san0ul ' SIS3IIb3J uulsupdxa VSn aiewwila um sau(I
r sauipgupduwxu lequapisai ucgan/lemgnamj8e-lpjni lenuaual ssaippe 1uu Sao(►
C
A .1. 1 "IIII1 .LVdWO7 K
azls unuulxCUl oN '.
9Fh{,
N01 .1. Va I.SlNnvaV `
If a e.
snuuy Ausuap pasoduad )Ili gum p3113130sse sl angaafgo io asodind oN w
Jayaa aoJ sapou I/ -) aeau pueI 51ahui Alicayiaads lesodold stip
zX Jagai Jo paau III Isom ' Sagip(pludwoaui
ry;
apuaua8 u1 6layg Daum sI saauapisaa ieau puel lemgnau3e tscaaa ( pap:uBlsaP r
,
1/J ) p- !Iiauuuua aeau puel upgl asn JUMIJIaude aoJ palms ssal sI saauapisai mou peel 6luo paleiuw lucaydde
Jagaa wu$J sla.jpd aallpws sapnlaxa ,Clleayiaads lesodoid stip V/fl(1 `
Jagai III paau m lsum ' DSII lemgiviiAu auJ pilins ssal am slaaipd aallrms C of do molle III snuoq �( usuap (ld
I
Jagaa jul paau IsaleDij gum slaved Dill ) o saauelsumaiii aql sszoppe pm sao( 1 V/n ( I I III do p
=
Jagaa paau Ielp slaaied Jayul ssaappc lou sao( I (slaaaed azls lauls ) p wnwlulw Daae OZ
sluaya s , am; lI , ( ) 'iw iagio gum sauq o �
( poo sauiadoid llannatl pue zluul J auJ lapaa ap! Aoad o1 painlanalS paulgmoa lamas pue �a)em o) Iuaaefpe sl
e
D10.r 'x ` SS3NNIV3 ( 7JfJ Die euall�a ,Clepunoq VSn a se saAias '
All OC of StIp )egl peoi leuaue ue singe
lk
JJ(1 Xg papanp se OZ muiJ slaaaed alwu I/7 a 01 luaaefpP.. SI
zluuIJ to jollam PAUU11 :)) J1 ascaaaul Ie I puel joj uoiluuSisap asn Puci JJa I oI paluasaid
s=
L. LNO' 17 N0.1 d31 ' 13N UE ptnoa) OSI
mail a a)eaaa pue VSfI Dill puedxa ane11 .O '1W )eqm : 1 g
pn
7V S3N7V �a
SAIISS1JSNOil V . I ' IdNI/SNOI .I. V , H1 ISIIf NILV dO # NOLI.dINMAU SS3AI LVNN3 L'1V
sills ales Idwdde fail alpu2isapJJ 01 ulaulpuame as 11 purl pal eniu1 Q11nu3 I (N )Z ,(aenue f ' uolleu8isip asn puel mau amaja
oI Iuaulpuame 1xal palentul ,(lunoa I (IIIZ djenue f � , 114"" .1,
s€ i <.
MO
5A ,11.I. VNN :Lf.' IV 30 AHVINIVIIS
4�
w d Y
✓i' ' 4y tt kr,
a ., 3`. : . . b ,... . : .. ,.✓. . . 4' .. A. . 2. . ±n,F: 'S' . r. ,.:. _ vY I, , . � ..
. .>_ £" .w , : . wli`;�, .. ... ., .'� �.. v.. .,
;..+ry t ¢ , : •. ' ."y. - :: =i $ . . . .«> . ;!<§ a. .g 4`: . ry . >t. ,. -. x
a 4 ., ;n . s .. . . . {, . . ... . > � " r <:. �. ,�- . . d .. , , "'_ .. 593 ' s#F . .,., . .x ,
,. xds. ..� �! . . . 8:t� ?. c . s n y.. �C r. . , fi' ;'s:'.. ze• .rY, ^�' ',a � >< ,waNd7 `5:. . m c, ,.
-',k;:; s 4 ,z"F` . 4 k: . .e•,. �.t , k :�� £ : , ,. U ,� ra y �. : h �: � ,.n � .� �.
Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed the Comprehensive Plan
a amendment process , advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County
Commissioners on this amendment request . If the Board approves the transmittal of this ,
application to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA ) in Tallahassee for their 60 - day
review , a second and final public hearing will be scheduled to consider any comments made
by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan . If the
Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA , the application process will come
to an end .
Director Keating used a POWER POINTTM presentation to explain the amendment
(A COPY OF WHICH IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR TODAY ' S MEETING ) .
The principal issue is whether the Urban Service Area (USA) should be expanded . The
Board considered this matter on July 11 , 2000 and denied it, directing staff to schedule a
workshop , which was done . Staff is now recommending Alternative 2 to achieve the desired
a+ .
objectives .
Commissioner Adams felt that the Board had asked staff to ` ` create a pony" and they
" came back with an elephant " . She did not see anything wrong in having separate
applications from each of the property owners to be considered individually .
Commissioner Macht felt that the Board is the creator of the problem as staff had
originally recommended against any of the options involved . Staff' s recommendation
provides for logical step by step development . He was very uncomfortable with any of the
suggested options and believed it would be better to do nothing at this time .
JUNE s , 2001
- 68 -
i" ..
W
t Cvx
v
�y rF an:
s7
Y
w
^C 1
a
-3 La'�r,.�''t rf ,. ,.. :. . 'c=r' m.,.:t',rr'ro ��a` _ x• -s yea Y :- # . :sia: .
. - ^. . `�` . ., kt . „xs <<�� 6".. h;.� �j' :,+P �✓`aF � >�:. ,
, . ree !. _ . .y . `F.,, ,a^ .
" v.. , . :.. . , ,. a
�� ..;,. ,,,W , ,. , Y'x ., ,•Ak, � 3 .. . d . .... .. 3 ,, �4 ;. . $ +.� ,,. '+'� �
+x sx4� '�',`::. . =a . � a
;�. - .. . .�. .�n+.
c ,
y�-" v : ' 'n3� `,.W .S.F'K .a.�.. d' � N 4 . ..:.;\ . :x .A. : � W. ;�y, , T` :•. �.
� 't:4r,. Y ;«Tw,A.�r ��yyC,.
tt r�
,, as w., : � r, • r .,,�, �.�iE �e. . . k �'>v4 't....v��4v*x5, � qt' . . ' %.. ' 4 r fit^:.r. ur. :S: m
" .t � sxc, w F �+. ,>= e�n h� ', r ;7� V . . k ,_ `s"� �,
..xL ��y£?fms�� .. . - +: . t -' ,. ' -• ,1'� Sys. k':7`"'S.� , p } 3''•< ✓ .:i 3 Ott �'.:i .✓'fir
,Y£';.� . ?f � Y. , . ,. . s :.es. � `- .K'. . .nir� ;r;+aJ . F y�"i. se y. .
.'+"'.V '.'.p5,k?i. A, : e v �. . 't't � . :: �v.�..n .?+ �ta,�.i h re4�L•�a.✓' i�i�tiY�S ,,. Ui'' . :'.. y. .
k '. ±V { . . . S x'Si . .. , 'k...v.JM^i", � L. . .
'44,.kia,,d,
5 ;.:r:.�
+ , . i-„YwC. 1T.h ,, _ ,dr„ , . £ v✓s;:,a. , - a k> bt -
w'£ 'Y"� .. r. "+ ..
.... >•: . -, �`' : .s. �. . .. ... :. ;d- .E' . :��G, rqS '' ,�.•
„,£.. . : .. r r - _- r , . J a: .n £ � r, k i �. .xN'F�� {, ',•� t:x- . � .,,x xb, r . _
.,;� . . .� ', z .�`�.,. y .:_ Y., -'' �.` s;: ., ,1 , rM . - :.,� ' ,raz
. �*•ct:yr^., a : 1 a : , � w . ,:. . .z s � ... ra s. 3,s m,: . z. ;� J:. x,».:,¢£ 5. :,,. Yds
$'. ., §� . "%��a.. r .. �twr-' t�4e, '"`y�^' . 'S € -. �x^i `ks»w�i',�-a .sv� . . � v" .T <
3 z
. . fi"3 .9H � . .; - '� . , , .. b.. . . .£ „rY�.= 52y�..h+a � +^`:x, '•" �- :, ,..,r ^�.0 w ."Y...
4 tf, 'i. f,�s `'r''# r • #' 3,kt .sF.�: ,rc`h .
Lc.�+' . .,. � ' - . . " +f�rR'"x�: , . .s. ,. ' ,. „ wa.. xu^, . .nd, K,� _,,.. ,. F . "Fi ;+' .-..µ'±i' p .. ..=
e . .� .y.Ty� ., .� G2+b-n ,.^��t•.. J". , N, -� a t "<- � :,
+ ' .,»5F Y �. a , 1 ,. . , , , � r - , , Vie. v `u. �- -, � � 'i :.:.'.:�n•�* t< ` sem-s.� .� k e.,
t,�fif i'k, .. -. , . ��ly. „ - 'e�, � .�. .. � �� �'. � #`. `"
. , : 9.r. . ,. ,. . . , 1 .d 4 � , 4. ` ' .. ., #� .. ti ,zr`z „ :. .-s+w r . ». . ;� .. . i� � 5'.. -.Un
. ,,-r, %i�•. �..n. " Tom` � .,x, U � a a ,ow3
rk S
�a v
`k., ,N. ... : ' ,f;. - �+ , 1 s'. . ' ' .. v , h sy ,.g ..Y➢: .r ' W1' n�_.` : `'„ , k a;r , ^,, `'" r^., ...asxa
b,,,,a £+`� , ;n�' 93:£- sJ s sr .'F t w, y, „ x* .M . F q +.: .eF . .s.e°r ,: $" ta & �
a � 5z`rx P
Commissioner Adams expressed her concerns about staff reports which she felt
contained considerable editorializing . She only wanted to see the facts and was concerned
that staff might be influencing the options . She still felt a need to find some appropriate
relief for this property . _
Commissioner Stanbridge noted that there are always pressure points and the Clontz
property is one of those . It is obvious relief is needed but Mr . O ' Haire had expressed his If
willingness to take his chances with DCA and the Board was also willing , with conditions .
Chairman Ginn stated that she liked the rural villages option and felt Indian River
County is lucky in that it still has open land to do that while other counties can no longer
choose such an option . She believed there is a lot of land available for development without
going outside the USA and felt the USA should be maintained as it is .
Commissioner Macht felt the argument that Clontz can no longer use his land is
specious as other citrus farmers are now raising more current products .
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter .
Attorney Michael O ' Haire , 311 Cardinal Drive , representing both Clontz and
f If
Beuttell , stated that a man could support a family on 20 acres in the 1950s and 1960s .
However, Mr . Clontz and Mr . Beuttell are now in an identical situation . Both of these
families have been involved in citrus for over 5 decades . Agriculture simply cannot be
If
protected in these areas where urbanization is growing up all around the agricultural lands .
ffIf
He stated that Mr . Clontz was not able to attend the meeting because he cannot make a living
If farming this 20 acres and now is a long distance trucker . He asked for a direction to staff to
transmit the O ' Haire alternative .
JUNE 59 2001 �
- 69 -
a
uk
h
�.„ , r 2 z ml !.-"*t t' ,� J, v - F� ; z„=•.: -. ra sYT.
,,'' •"'� ., .,. s: . . . . :m .,gA-.. a , .„�.4 ,., ... . `gfie.,�,s ' ....` we- ♦. .: tx ' ,x., .
.rn . c .nk rcr+:e ', °, ' e„" ,•g . k';=,,,x ; wfr , ':nsx.:
,. -, `=' ' s,;.t� S .F* ^ x
..2 pj..f, , i%�' . „ 1�,” rc ''f r e F >a.}«'3 '"3^5 " . , £ ` +,ick •S u'4
a •+k'T" +`.• . t ` �' s
• �1`�v,.a. .. . ., � ; � ,.. `. . ...:�. �r s^�"..a,�' i4, '. �:,., -u .;�. ,k. �` a ;• .
� yAf. �.. �,,, as
j .,
4Y'
z ^ '
a 3 +t ti
H
M a5r�'3,h,.4w... � � � . � � � r.'. ';. � i:, „ ;, i- �''•`�^ ' r8 .� � .�
_ � � 4., . `•i t� ?s. 1. { � .✓'
^}, .
k� w. � . .. . ,..5. F , �wx} n
. ,. . - . . .. . ,e#.< ,,. . .. � �. <..'>� . . rv,'» :, , wF : .,"ar "' >n
u .: •�a. 3 - : . .. '�. S- _ �,
- � � r
� `�' , � ��Saw, r5 �. £, < ��.•s
.. y. u
g� >A. ... °�p��y„^xrc . +, . «�;_'a s,�'” sak. . ,<.y 'c�j, . �:-. -+3*+5.+,�,' €�'?; n : z, ai �stx.u�^'C«,:.
-�+sa�•kr _�Y x 'S ( Y . : ,�{€��ya .w-3a
r "'#s
4e *. �,�, 'rr�'� -?�
G<
..� Xxxs m �
.`5�. . ,.... . . < P # •„ $ ' $ a , .. ,u >r .P... . ..o `M1. :<.. , ,. �Yx. �. . "3'2't':: ,.. �
,. ev Arv.. , t r ,>f +PSi ' � n �v
a¢^! '@7:: ... , ;�{ r. . Y,'"•. . . :. r:.. . , >x .. 2>e ..v+,. .. . v, : .,. , . v ;'{ .. s
s:.,,. > #.,' . i� . .> � + . sr: r ,. ?.,: ., '>m
S , r. _. .. , ,. , .;. . .`i~s.=v.. r.5. . 5a ; . ..._ .+> � � x*g". :4r.., sJs. "�?.�. � .�..
. , n .,.. . ,,;•.. . e ., ff � + a ,.�
,.. �� , ,. . . .F r . , y . . �> ._.. .,, .. . i,... . sx . F , §`. .,,. 'i*• r. ...T -,rek,� . . #. a. ,rvi�r.
,.., aa'
,� . . , . c ; : . ' .: .. to i Yfr_ "Sk Y. . .ra. , i <. . +s a. > ..3t :.�r "s %>+�".< d,.- . » ,+.?..
, �. "�' x .:s" - . >,.rr �%• m ,... . .:r 1e,
.. . , .^ . , ... .. e .v, d . r',s. .. � ,+ .- . , P.,t a " m ei . � . >.
?r� '• �' e'�. � .'a�5n s �a 'n ":, xa� �:. .fr:,y
� a
K .
Commissioner Macht stated that staff not only has the right but also the responsibility k
to present their professional opinions . They are not violating the Board ' s direction and he
believed that, if staff is going to parrot the Board ' s opinions , that would be contrary to their
' professionalism .
E .
George Beuttell , 5000 16 ' Street , part owner of the 80 acres on 82 " Avenue , noted
that his family has owned that property since the early 1960s . As he understood the problem
the USA is an area where utilities are available or will be available ; sewer, water, fire , police
protection and roads . If that is the definition , the maps depicting the USA are wrong in many
locations . There are properties along 43 `d Avenue from Oslo to the St . Lucie County line that
do not have water and sewer but are being depicted as being within the USA . His property
is just east of the USA and he believed they should be allowed to use the existing facilities .
The property just across the street and to the south is inside the USA, but they are not . One
unit per acre is not high density and they should be allowed to develop under those
standards .
Director Keating stated that the same is true for Mr . Clontz .
Peter Speliotis of St . Lucie County , stated he is a neighbor of Elsie Crow whose >
property consists of 18 - 19 acres to the south of Mr . Clontz, bordered on the east by US # 1 .
Everything Mr . O ' Haire says is true and applies to Mrs . Crow ' s situation . Giving Mr . Clontz
the relief asked for creates the same situation for Mrs . Crow . He did not feel this is the time
or the place for rural villages and believed that, if the Board moves forward with the O ' Haire
proposal , it will simply create other problems .
JUNE 59 2001 D
- 70 -
+ .;s a .?s. q� ..,i> tae t 4 -.. ...t.. :. "Y 2iz 1 P � k
< Y .( ll4 'f.. 5"- n"S.t. , -�fi. ,tv4 ,t . u. .m y A. :.
tA':, r ,=b.+r y,- >, "tn A t {.; ': .£, a>,:. T . x{' " iA ',':: A++ St r. . . 4
. fi
4
� 3; 4x r ...�
wS "'"s "N Fre
v fi b •• fry ^tw"nS .''
"g-2 r vSt q.+ n>. :r
:34 S.v' Y# b "t
4. i�tS tem .. :. : ry .. a .r n �, 3 . ... •. ,. . � 5r ,s..,. .. i. _ ,n =. A
✓ . .. 14 .a MkY . . e. '?f .. , e r. �.". MtxR. , ( E v „lv`h, e. 41 '>R �.
f '2 <+Y- �', " . ,. r .5=. � a . , 'fi" ,. , .. Wit'.' .F, ti•.4 ,.. t
+ va. .s,. ,4<,
...< :.
. , 3` ks., d
z . a, ,
,.'7r'st: . . .. . . .*r .,. 1' N,. m .: x •, .s . .d : ;'[,C ., . . ,t .ss _.n�,
. 'VAN. "'NOR
..k. ' _ sr ,. .K 'm... , ;_. , _ .. . . ,'' #'.. '�ku ':~' ` .. >•.E «
. G 'a k v.�
g .. � v, ��;. �_+ .}, u r�''- f ag �ry „a,q. fS wr'4 �. �rv'K ;„°z1z6:hr. L �} a
;v 7,: k�� i` i 8:>•
:'" , , t . .Ga�.� s r,¢'.AT . z � $.:_
;� ar? . , , . �Uiq;, trv . . .+.. ,+,. v' ,r:"f•✓ t£<+P *» .., ,rv. , m `§
'..ye:f . .,
x � . a
F • _ � r_a i �. ��
:. °. . ^ r � .),.
�-"��-``.0 .,
x
h� rx.'71u:#, �"a .. a :,?•;v A a. "S,`� ' '*�' ,<z `l ., � ''. 4 s.,n
ti'
d'2.' .S" � . „ rv . '-k# , .=,4.:•:- . .Z . r �. .� x ::;r ., . s, . x ..,, , x % :�.,. rt . x' 2 � ._
s "rr§ Ar 1 ,s k wUf. �r� . .
t ,;,„`•"� . - , a . a , . ,�,r. .., . .. . . a o-z+ s+� ,'e::' r A ^"r"r a-
a .c . i, {,�, ,: �,
& vs
'ti '��. a n a : . . e , s '`bd.,�:. , 'k4'. Y rs 'n4 ±,:., 45 . : :'4'r .� F ' 5�v"u` v , : x� .
�"*+^ s' � ,•r... +*J�7 r >z Fx° r`�Y ,, .. ��.:. ;u, z ::p 5' 1i,�5$se4 C . .. , ,. + Y„� •
�
: "? �.i9 : . ,�' ^ ... . . . :. � ,. . - :• . .. r• t= ,.. � e,�x,.y,. v,. .1. , r . a,.:,. : 4 3..,#"
i , ,,�. s - �',. s, a: . : `: . _ ,. r.7.r � .. r :.0 �,
`^'
VIA
,e
P ,i
„._s . - , �_.'. 4 . -n. . . , , ... tt' ,.,'•<._ : i.x t ., r ,+�-...., , P u -+ . .,� � wi ^r , .n..;;:.
-k . .,� +�v .r. „..a <. "rr:..,. Sr - ¢ . sr. c - ,U , tr„A�:q. :w a:
^:�
-. «�a, ' . - . '%� . .� i ° �tw.. �a�x � 5 ,� . ,, -. . � '- >'„ e" et._. "�'tKF.i. a5 t3.. � ,ib^nrlt
„,. ax > :�?r" 4 ay;. ��f i'i.,: "�. a ��� 5`Pt w'✓., FC • ` . .�` t3 ^ `ry�.��3 r 4'�,3?"'';�p .µG#�',,++��YYy�
�o-h * ��3< Y . r"$, �+ "r7` ..d^C 3'� dy , 3 s� �� a� ,�r.,L..r� ,u •' ��� t r � s`R,� p r rr
� '{, h
.�+ . n ..._ .. ±- : . .e .� nw .. ♦ ,: _� rv. b,a 4d , n ,. i,. : n n'_ n,
1pu"
Sv
6
p �
#n ,
.no
Richard Beuttell , 2013 Cordova Avenue , resident of Vero Beach since 1951 whose
property has been in his family since 1960 , stated that his dad was in the citrus business here
from 1951 until the 1970s . He got out of the citrus business when he saw what was coming .
He supported the remarks of Messrs . Clontz and Beuttell .
Ken Hendrix , 6220 1 " Street SW, expressed his opposition to Alternate 2 as he
believed it would be an overreaching solution .
11 Ile
Ralph Sexton , 8005 37t" Street , expressed his support for the O ' Haire alternative .
B . J. McClure felt the real issue was whether or not to increase density by spot
zoning . He was sympathetic to the problems being experienced by Messrs . Clontz and
Beuttell , but did not believe a request for spot zoning to maximize their return on their
properties would be fair . He asked the Board to reject the proposals .
Ray Reinhard , 398 Farley Court , expressed his opposition to the proposals .
Rosanna Crawford , 120 66t" Avenue SW, asked the Board to reject all the proposals .
Michelle Jerkins , 6190 5t" Street SW, also objected to all the submitted proposals .
Tom Tierney , 2247 17 " Avenue , expressed his opposition to the proposals .
JUNE 59 20011 & 4 4
- 71 -
ae:;;. :.r.y46
v
� rN ..• F°..� �e'•s . ,'
k� b +y '
yt`b.. . : .. . , .- . b , . . > 3 . ..,= :•d^ � h : _ aA.. ,. t _-.. �t ;, , , h > .�. e.. x . t. .i:-
... : v 1*t'wYv,,.. �' � Fz9`Y,t ., c ,., � . „ .,
r " Jy' , e. ' �s<•� 't~," iW. > , �
co- .3r`" rrP A . . � H' . .-n d`,4 re„y �... .- , .,.., 's. -. t x?#g:, x ,. .-. "9 4-:
--st+U '/ au.;.rr, `✓ s., C
.,U ,, , - T„ ✓ °�,� .n .o-. „ t* . .c.. . v„ , . ..� s , .n,. .. r .,, r �". ... ..f'Y4m �,�
u ,.>c ,> �.. . t ... .: ` ;'
a
� �. , r .. , , �. . . .. # r �. i ^b.- .,,fir ; '4, +s + s, "`Y_ u. ,. . . & , F, P s t t;x ,,,
� .: r� a ..>• sl. ,,. *cag'7 a'` 3z r.,. zr ''” fix x";•. M x 'S'3
�z .��
.. . .
,. P`x 3' . :. ' -3. • 3r . '^ '2^ 5 ,r`
x: `d,: ... vf, - . k r_ . n,; � ; :' R. .. , "", Y. . �.dd` 5v7 ° .�s: r , .rr✓i,v 'nss, v. x.
,...'d, y fiv "., - 5 � ' .. �+,. T . .
aP � 3�-f ' _ w?& ., 3, ti ,a > ,. • � Y"".n ,t» b'A e�.,Y--; .!"fie x .u3,�.. w.s � �. ::a� gK ;v.>;
dt a 'k, 9 q. si y_ . R.. ,!"4x .:, " ;'+ k e .. . _'r i x' ;<.:
� '>v�,r
7�r..�".
_. .
..�#rt .:
" . 94 . ,
.t
�.qr � v. . ,Y,.:d
, §' . , f �,`" , `.z. . . 'h t � ,. ,. u' . . .,. . .a : , ,.. « � ._z;. , .m .,. i..� , . - . •L
'�. W _.r-. � .'^Tt x . .
ty
$ . 'dF 2 ..A' a •3. ... , .. S r .: . . ... ,.n.,y, r.,. w e.;.i. ,, t i :r 3 e} . ,
. .. . n 3.:' : . ,,. ,. e , , r .. , . '{ -r ,P' .rr d::;
S d.• .
'A,eaY .�. . £xgs�Ya,. 0 • .1 .. ..: yr r'T ,. ti^' p.. . .. � 'p . .. r 9 -�,Y ,.m . Y.�. ,f b Y" s #' ..'.I`4
., :-n.( _f ::. .. u!a. n4 � �iN.+3' ursrb £t' } {�# F�` £ � :,p� rsa. i.. �xe�� .(� bi k.s., f t > �'
N...S
,uJ. , k'. . E . T ' t 4. - , ley` F '!'s^sr.. " !kY, `«;;sT ° ;✓7.N 3 r pnnnxY,^, " ,3 a zs 3: 2 nL
k� � �� " . ! v «u � � �•� - b2 r=. v.Y N tr- G, f '.id G£f-.'� 3
�S" k �¢$rp �z� :�a«.£y.. .� :. .( 44 �v �`& ' " "+ u"fgf
Q
George Kahle , 6020 5 " Street SW, had no objection to the O ' Haire proposal . His
family is involved in the Pointe West development and he recited the time and money
involved in developing that proposal to meet the regulations .
Greg Bossart, 7835 1 " Street SW, asked the Board to reject all proposals .
Rebecca Barkett, 6315 4 " Street, was opposed to any changes to the Lane Use Plan .
k ,
Ted Angell , 5955 4" Street, also expressed his opposition to the proposals .
Mary Wood , 220 Sopwith Drive , was opposed to any changes .
Peter Speliotis felt that all of the people speaking in opposition today are committed
to their lifestyle and do not want to see changes made .
In response to questioning, Deputy County Attorney Will Collins explained that the
Bert Harris Property Rights Act simply concerns any regulation or change after May 11 ,
1995 which imposes undue economic burden on someone ' s property and allows a claim to
be made if such burden can be proven . He did not believe that Act would apply in these
instances .
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter . There
being none , the Chairman closed the public hearing .
JUNE 59 2001
- 72 -
%to "; m ' s 4q" ° wx Yi .Fd .
ms5s�.e&^rHrfr
gn
..v". v fr- r : t+ ,. , Rf ,, T8s *•...,.� .. :¢. . e ,x . ¢ 1 t .. n sh .,t .i .t+~i. „n. «'.Y
.t Ra , n .A v'r ".''t.:., �$ r ?
,.,, s < , cea
� ,. . . .
♦
A .� .`I
-AD. °' 'sI` x , i`,
;i3 "v xq s. .' k1*vd. R�+, rq . . �:,
.., sk ,. +.�' t r �, { .ySC. , A a . . *§ { ��,,,>x. , 1`'x wt.. m
'"" ' S' -z5` •.1- ... 1R s . . a '-`v . < "�
5s` r ,R�,
-m.3r ,Sw o- .. ':,, Y^, t^ rk a'...... , : , a s t .„. p,. rn a a ; Lt ➢ .: ;o " < rgu" :yu, �Y :'. h
�.y + rzl �.: tJ ,#Nas,. y'ta 4 a„ ro ' '
w,:.. ,T
. �... .r� i✓ � �.r ,>`w. :-,fin--.'�a��'tr�. �»�,�� � �«�5. ......_... .,: .!
l:'.. <, r . '. . . - aA qSv ' • .:R� . , k � . . . ." , �f'='r a ... s::... . > ,. : w ..P`
_.f .rve .. :c�' .n, >. . -�. . .c. �
. . ". .;. z. ✓ x.. r . Y"'6 " ; , . s ,..... . ,`*:Er >�. ,.. . `t, . .. ,*. a5- a'e9 .>3. . "t „ a, . . Lx .
. , § o > .... � r :,r r z. ',: . . .. ..,;afix > . . 3 f . '
nA; . ..,.. . . . .. , , :Y", . r,• ,.. ?ski E 'a. . ^1 r4Y ..,. s vi... l, . . x : ar"F
3 .t :,� .2a"''.* - �Yf^ a.r ,ai, , . =:53 .''Y'^
's�: .
, . _: .. �{ „ Y.t� . ,;
_. _ff
. :
Je . } L a.. 'id ....+ Rrpv 4 $•. .�'t„; .4'4.. .r ,:'b n. #:. } , � ..ec.. Y rx/.� "n r-._
. �" x. LS"+�„ .}.
r#'
. . " tiv ✓,�' 's. , &. r. ' a.. a. S. f4.. a e �. SY ^FL
rv . ..,. . . �-{" : r 9,1��✓. !�... . v G. . 54 . 1 s. `!b> , �..ee, , [h .. J' S. F J If.:.
'-'G' .
..,.
e
y
F
t
a
xx
E
d
F
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin , to approve
transmittal of Alternative 1 - Mr . O ' Haire ` s
Transitional Area Proposal .
Under discussion , Commissioner Macht believed that to base this change on relief for
individuals is not right .
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Motion carried by a 3 - 2 vote (Commissioner
Macht and Chairman Ginn opposed) . (Adopted
Resolution 2001 - 056 approving the transmittal of a
proposed amendment to the Indian River County `
Comprehensive Plan to the State of Florida
Department of Community Affairs for its review . )
JUNE 59 2001
- 73 -
t,
73 -E �'
�3,, ..< '.e ,». , #' ., ': _ .. a v,.... ,,. . •af V ,*, ,.,. . tT''�1 - � :'>,N: me 1 r }
� , ,. , eY .. �. ;.. <:5a : .. n � > t , .. . .. a : rSS k,'`SG �`7•`",. r r-45^ nr. . i
. .e��a� ,v.- r. ,> . ,,. � »a . ., . ,. 6 ,.... F�; £,
. .n F$"".. ... s . ,. .... ' , . Ya. . , ;�Yl .. . .�C« . w'3 e^.r. 4.d3Y,.. ��.T. ... {' >✓ vfkj. Y , .:3..:
, xt , J :'e: . , :. ..:.rT } . . .... .,. � ♦ u , :'.%/ t .+'S,"hx� .4. -. Cc.r , . .i,.r.. $k.�im «,hF
: —.p}
# .�--:. . . r,� .a. 'v , a . ', � _. z... . . .<'� c . . C.ak 'ti c. . ; 'Y -' h .s;;.:r• r `
._ v :s' `.Cx.t: . . ., a. . �'. . .d*',,._. ° . - ;,as -t%... ,_ >^' _ . . . ',x yff.�
' �.. x . ._ , `%'.. .. - . , .. . . r<a . . .,a �. -. .: £ ,c.+.r'. , ,tiU o:s '. rr *,. s ...>,. , �✓+
:,s� . m"i x 'i:. ,. A. -r ,3... ., . 1 , i a� i {,.w:: v. ;:kc .�' � .:. .r�, � �, .. � . �. f .,.. ��
:�.r. . . a ^u . , ,v., �`^• w - , .. ,5 ^�'..,. .. as .: sYa_ . `}r• .v ., Fr r. ._ w at{ >
L . . .,: '< s :+*... _ . ,.. -,. d > . 4 .. .. , '�+, n.. . _ 2 ....:: - � � t r'r •,
:r �.». ia,a . 4• .. > ,,. ar zy . .,s . 7. .w. . a L a < -, , ,tk n LL��,,
.q , .. „r. . 3 ,- _ . . ?r' < . . „ A _ ,.,e> x,Y,.r .. 4• ,'�'. .. F ..: . + + F"Y=:Lx� v x.v:..
_:: .k=,,. z.� '^ � .. ,. : ., . :A .fin.. .° 1 � .,:, x�'r ^s .» FS s� ^�::. s' s
.. 6
'Pt""G
:'.;.. :
f. r. T _ry -G . k' w .p , i -. : . .. . . , - ,r..�. , \. ... t .i . i. ,..+ . . L he�.�'':�':k .. £ �` ♦. {.
y .:x�. S. . F d `ei5rs. ...';. L . - �.. +"� .4�. �c %n+"` ?Y � , r.. n �.- ��M ��,/., . K^,ni .9`.ly. . A � d ...e. !"MI
k .:...
..
:. . r 't
} PoK . :Uv.... .r . . .?. ,. , ��. . �:_ t`P• . �F d`k Y''r.
.,n�.. > =.wt k4 k . . . ke ✓'1F .,s £3 �..;.. s ;x. ..• , . 'v�„ ta. -, 9 v'S"s.�`:'w`s1 u
. x'i : ,e . .. � 4f `�p�. ;� re 4 `4 cr
ev'Ei'.t�� i:�4 � '-.
-L. ,..-as.. vv �. "ss...;. ,#
`{# .,. ." .
4v,,Y..+p,+u,,v.__*.nt..+.,,;-.,..�M,-.....ra.,..:,T,.s..,k�-,x. .�x,,..::.ra.,,.. .,:';,<a...,x.rk..,.,„.,.�..S,,..t,.z. ..,. . ..,,.:,r.d r ,,. : ;. .,. Ti" '.... : -
a. a:..v.,9t�+�.,..--.,.'.k,:..�,fty<....�.>.r�..:..,?s.�. #r,,.i.,.,,,, ._'€5,x..nn., -�K[�x:d s. ,_�,_,.-,...�T._.,.: i'Y.,tt.»�•,.rrr.,s. - , �..,✓Z.k, ..'...,,�,..,,,.,'t«z.o..f'
,zkt. 3,x,^'"..,-..,.•k`:.er ,_ �,t�_Ntt.r�,. . i�.,r."-.�:,...,<a,..,,'r... "' ..,x.t.,„...'v�,.,-".cr..a,sg_,5'x,A,,s....-.,.,.�.,.,,. rs,f+n§.."hr�, .x;a,,x,.n".5.7w..,....:.,.tr
",9,r.x�,.'.§s.-.,.:..+.�.s:Gr.,.,...,.,,..- a>r$F. z..,,. r.Cx.x..`.n.-},c:w
. . ..sf
..
w^ ' -I
�3xLtiE„;U�
s.^.rr£. +.
.,V,
...
ta.iE
x .a, , s S Y .ti1
nxs Fr
n
ti� a �
..
x 4
arM. • w na-: rf^ , , ri`,_ A, "' & ., , � s ,.. k.,, x n, r ; R o .
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 056
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA , APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT
TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW.
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990, and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its
January 2001 amendment submittal window, and " <<
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan
amendment request on April 5 , 2001 , after due public notice, and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency could not pass a motion regarding the
comprehensive plan amendment listed below ; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on June 5 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184( 15 ) (b) ( 1 ) , and
WHEREAS , The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public
hearing its intention to advertise and hold a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan
amendment process .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA THAT:
1 . The above recitals are ratified in their entirety .
2 • The following proposed amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan
is approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs :
Request to amend the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan
regarding the establishment of a new T, Transitional Residential , land use
designation as shown in the Attachment to this resolution .
JUNE 59 2001 i t
o Li
I Ile
- 74 -
"rd
: .,ay !
', 3 :. ,.) .J. .:,... #" 5 5 Y , TE. N t ' f �. rX'i'•, f
. xY' r Qa . . . ,. 5' ._ ..,�Y1� < . a,*x ,. ,,., . - :k. caifi k .., ... , :: av .Ysu a x ' w. ,
.. - :,. -, , �, . .,: . "tvecf r. �+ xy .} � x c+e„ s K.": � k a �;.c ✓ r; ,• :
,�,5, . . .> a 'j c `x r.,+..r" x w ._ a, L � ..5 .. :,, ,, .. v ,+x . ,. Y ,. t' ,i
.}� .v , ...,.. „£' s tt a,,. ,.s.. ) ' . . ,3'*,.. ;tz•*5 .a'p , p' ,a„
„tv- , ... -. ,x =a..3. t.. .0 ,.. r :,s. ..e .:.: xk r ':u;~; F' 9 ,-., 'k +•F:. �± ' � � .t`..
> `s # ^` s7t >I rt. '$.w,�a � u '^ x ,k '� � 1k a
. ,-;,1"x. .
x! � . . „ , t, ✓. a . :., . . v x T1 „a. ._. ,r$.x,,.. '� a „.F, . x. K . .,�. p» t ^. :.:.� w �,.,
,. .,. 5 . , , r.d. t Yu ,r. ,� � n <.: s . :- �, " , 'a e.a.1:,, L'r� axe 13. . Xax �3, 6` -''a,+', ,3 kb
y� 33. ,.�u"a" "'•- v . "£�. L,.. _kR. . . x. a :r : +Y Sm' a , `"'�,�:?' c T .r R'f" ,v'a sts 8>
,.- 4 "*t .sf�-0;'8 xn ,= , .. -+. ,"�`�.vtfi� 1:;. �" s a�,?Y� 4, �d ,c. :�` �,, y 3 %
:. ,✓ k ' , ,.; - fi, _e:. .:R- . , ,>
:€v a ..«`>h
"..: K. _7�:,,� „ , _'ca ,f .t, 4 :N n,�;°? .; is „s, � �}� Y�Sv'x€r'.� e Z
f, , t5ei M t, .r :.,, � �Y- Sx . . . �. n axa, r .kd r VIM,,#�
..� . tr. .. �:,.:.. . A ..., r. _ . r. +-+_. , y� 1 4
-.��`t , . .: .,
,-...v. F c � ..... ,_ ? • . r<x . . ..... . _ . ,§ 1 . �.
"i �✓<. « crM
. a ... . < `�c . - s •a . . . .,.... t ... � x.a . . & . -a .:. .. t> a`. ,,.• x Lt ,,.......
. a-.,,,.. . _... . . 1. J :: � a, .a.Na„k�r-+ ,F .., `,k �^�` ,,.". rW s kr... r. , s ' o-"
au.. , ,. t, .,s, s ,: y+,. 3 v . v . Y e „ Css; . . . . w.,.:r fit. . .v 5., <.0 -•;,.. ...,<,a. . 9
, ,, . a ,.. w.. ..<._ . ..§� ^:� . . . t.: , .... . r ,. r -„ ,,,f .w
" .. ,.. < . x . �, � - _ , aF•ti o _ . ;±., ,w . 's_ , :.t'F 1m. : ,. +t , + . , x. :s,r
. . 3 ;<.. . . . : ,... � ,t +,. , rf.. .
,5,�1,.,�, ,r sn� =�l"ay� - 'xz ,a . . !_.. Y . •,G� , ,. F.. x.. :r ,., '+t` •.,. ... ,-,s nrr.. , z .r v
r ,. . .. x r t s'J .,» . .r, ., -.n , .3, , .. x v ,3 xo- rre �< v�. r ?s �::�.
,^r`s , >... a.- �; . . r:3a` r.L, <. .., ,a„a .. ..i .r... t .c ., . .. .s „ , . . n .. 5
. .Ma az y . . -r» . .r . ':` . .. : a. r.., . <• .,
.k s+
�.; .§
sa
.
.3
r
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 056
The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Adams and seconded by
Commissioner Tippi n and upon being put to a vote , the vote was as follows :
E
Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Nay
Vice-Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Nay
Commissioner John W . Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held
this 5 ” day of June 2001 .
t
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , FLORIDA
BY : _'ej . CU
Caroline D . Ginn , Chairma
ATT4,r:L 5F I -
Jeffrey K . Barto lerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G . Collins II , Deputy County Attorney
4
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Jata
— r r
Robert M . Keating , AICP
Community Development Director -- —
JUNE 59 2001BA n
L Li
- 75 -
" 77
7s -
S
y, .r a. a f; x Y..' . :'F
4 `G'avr .. ., "„d . eld.. , ., Yo+ Sea. . lY . ✓ {3 < , '-. a :1 4 +'`a
§`a. �, 3
,. .a, H
, . . . , .: •- ,. ,�` . . 1 ' . ... ,. .. ro r. r.. . , . .. .. .» ,, . <:, b~€
.•.. a ° aG:a. ,,r� , . . " :'3�:, , n ' n* :e^: . >' q i . ....: 33r'. .,.,, �v _ a. 3. . ,.,: , .�t, xJ _y
Y r .: y
fir. . s . sz. +Yi. �.•&* :s �,.. :' ..,,str . n .. � . . _:: . ssa. . n ... .. ; _ e x .d . ,
'l i ..., j' . . ,, :.Sl.= � ,; . . :5 , r ?, E: s'� a,..;�.. ^, , x. . � . , k: .r� rte`=.x- .: •
. D. v . . d. . U. „r . , e 1' ik'e. . , . .. gc kSt :,. . . . . ug. . ._ v. . .,, l x. ;:,. a
, a .. n , .., ,n F,.A- Sih L, (w .§".,. :{AMSC"` ,. , ,,<": fir' T , . _.. , �. v$'�n .. • .sly. � �
o K , ..,� � .. ,. : nk'- . k„ "ti,LG, .,r ,"✓ •.,x, .... w.. .N. �. .,. r -. , . ,, .,-. . , �= . . ,_ air
1. ..x.. ... z d ,_. . ,f. , r-�,..x'*�Y Z x ��:}r
*„r . w,r- �., r� . •.., ...sir.= . +r% d,R�.. b. n , .: . ,.: . - <.�i`. _*. _. .. "a .. z,. .J" ,x. .. ..i
....o . of -3 a- . ��` , .. . :5 ., . 6 . L x . x sr �`#<
, l. , `iL U*'
s . >-,.. , y;. �. o .. N.. , . a : ,. .r .:,� . . ,,. _, siy�. . r, rhv . ? r,� t x�we•., . ,,.- .
,..,_. ,�� 4+ . :..,r � . a L��'i�� x'� 4n.. �. ,x
'$i'e §N3.r". ,., .; r,: "..:, a j� . , ":»: s .fi�,. -,� Y§'"CY YX". .,e : ,r •#u .[.-m. e :s:. r .. .:..., a
�d ;r `�'s a, , :1, rsSP�33.. a.�e,.� "� ":a a s
�v 4�� k
�ITTI I :
X, .3.
x n .. ,, .. ,. .. :. „ ,. . ,-. H.. :. . .� >. , . *, , , $, i ,,, .,.p l ,, ,,, ,, , ,
, ,,„ , r uyS '*e .:,. k . ...,' �t,lR. �'3x.. ..� . -. d ✓ .§x 5` ,.,., a, ak w..u+ ,.�w b �
. .
. ¢ ..... t +,. `� , . s.r. . .. a 'c+.<1 . Jst` ,w' �_ .q . . >,.. . r. n. +... s t ,.. ,r-. ,.
t` . ...,,., e ., a3✓_ , . t .t, .1, :,v t . ..'�.y�ga2 3 s (:.
It
*N ,,.., v , S'+i -u . . , •; .. �, ss... . .c3 -.. ,. Y�+ "rte, ,. n r'...„ 1. ,'{-. .n .; S . � t 3 " 's .%*-
fifi
at}y` � sr,` � . F. . c .„ y, '§ a;t >�,�.: &.z: '^� A,. a Tkz••,, . 4 § ,'s' a « a„ £ .., f.+..`.yrs
r 'F a $ ty"4, :-w s � � r :£,,,.� w '{ t ,. r , tXya
*:u"A ,e” G .,. -. .... . ;.., n.:.'Y u^ . . •, xa',v . %.v 2 . r 3 ^( Ya �� i"gl`
;u #, y� t>t'C i •, § 'S'
j
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -056
ATTACHMENT
PROPOSED TEXT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Future Land Use Element
Policy 1 . 2 : Indian River County hereby adopts the following land use designations to be depicted on the
Future Land Use Map :
C- 1 , Conservation- I (zero density )
C-2 , Conservation- 2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres)
C- 3 , Conservation-3 (up to 1 unit/21/2 acres )
AG- 1 , Agriculture- 1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres )
AG -2 , Agriculture- 2 ( up to 1 unit/ 10 acres)
AG- 3 , Agriculture-3 (up to 1 unit/20 acres)
R, Rural Residential (up to 1 unit/acre )
T, Transitional Residential (up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects )
L- 1 , Low-Density Residential - 1 (up to 3 units/acre)
L-2 , Low-Density Residential-2 (up to 6 units/acre)
M - 1 , Medium-Density Residential- 1 (up to 8 units/acre )
M- 2 , Medium-Density Residential-2 (up to 10 unit/acre)
BCID, Blue Cypress Improvement District (up to 10 unit/acre) `
C/I, Commercial/Industrial i .
RC, Regional Commercial
PUB , Public Facilities
REC , Recreation t .
Mixed Use (floating land use designation ; not depicted on the future land use map)
Policy 1 .42 : The Transitional Residential Land Use designation shall be applied to those areas which
serve as a transition area between urban and agriculturally designated land and are suitable for urban and
suburban scale development . Transitional Residential designated land shall be limited to areas that are
located within the urban service area Additionally Transitional Residential designated land must meet
all of the following criteria:
it must abut an arterial road that contains county water and sewer lines within its ( the road ' s )
nght-of- way ;
it must abut commercial/industrial designated property • and
it must be at least 20 acres in size .
CODING : Deletions are indicated by strike-thictighs; additions are shown as double underlined .
JUNE 59 2001 P $
- 76 -
5,`rR "i�7 "e k-i,k,P N , .:, y ,x� :., , , Y ” n: . . , ' a„ R�� ,v3y.:; i ..viy.:P2 i S .:.:w ' . i
l e ; . ,;:... ,.. .„, �.; y •a,k -„A '' Si L� a :�.
,:fs, r. F « a, t.• . . ..„ z. . . v+n r r ,'. A<f . ?,,.: . ,. ,. '; } , , 1
fi tre , Y. k. C"x.
d
,§ x „ .- . c „a; rrs ' � .: .,� � En
, $,q# . .. . , . . . s —ms ,�^
.. a. .0 0. ✓ :r .YP ,'4,+ 'iT '. , , ".tr }b R` T f, 3 -.tib' 'k#,
4� 4�. Sv rr�� ��Y 2'.1s.. "� ' �as... m. # � k*, M . h�
mbv x. a- w ,Y , . . 5
-
1' e n , ;a.: . .. . ,. :.. . /.;cXr.YC* ,➢wtir.. , , SAA'Pz . :-»a.La"' a:a.....; . ,.r, u*.. x N.. , ,. . s..:>
, . s . �:, e r s .A+ *aa ya 's "`sx +�s abfi'a , n2�� ,F ,+' i ,^.#?+1 ” 3
...,.. , M �` �”" '�' .%A a
A
, . .
. : .
I
es :
�L:liF 'S,
.w
*k
^ e
L�
yyb. + x.
,^ :.., ,.f. . . . ' :. ., _ ro. . ., , .r, a `,C,,. F %.. .$? f Se2'c9 n., k :,,... 1 t £ x
<} S 5 .. ,.♦y, R 4 t 3 ,'. -, kG" .-. . . 3+t 7 . .. `%r,,t h ..,rc.., t yf 5? :. '' ."133` L s: 4 5
„ . . -,'.. � ,}zn .�.,. : ... .
e .�..°:.kx �:'^b"'C< ,•-z =«. _�. v, s. bey �S1' A" £& %�5.�^5G•..c. a�. ���Ai , o-`,:�- .,'
i Z tvf i' v . » .- . .`,..x ka. ... '. yu,:i: ..: v. ii `r «: iL v ., h:i t 2 .::o. `f '-:..[ 4 S .l'.
•: 'n . : , .v ! A4 :a: _ ,A , -.. 3 f `
. . r r K Yn }y n gyp.. 4" r. Xa . . '.. arG� ,.. F. ; ✓. . .aa' - .. ... I 1' " r..... .
.::5 U :'v"i:
k xe- . _. ,;" ,`,' . �.. .;„xt. < . . r. ..<..- >Y•r :x>✓ u 1 `� # : .{ t „ Y�
v \: n . ... ,. ,,y}.��. E ,. a1. 1 ....+Y - .ry' :' - f ..e. n.. . l . r.. . f... A*.':',. "1 .f c..;, ".', .. l
4..,. `nn ..:Gf . . .., v .-:r:- :!v Pf ,S' :.x J iSv v' : ✓' £ Mt fYY r .: v � yV:.�', . i, Pai q'.3' 'Ya V
,L f... S
e• ,: .. '7 , z .. . . w<.. ..,. Y': x.+. +i.,'> >� ,.. n,. ... .x wa . _8., , t„n ,.,.:. .,r z ,. ...,,
_ ,.r . . . k k '... ..- 3:. ... ,.., . i,.,. r :,�` r .. 'w � L -, ^
. . ,: . r .. n . w . . P' kcs G. , a.. + .. . . .- . . ,- tt . : : . , . ra . .._.,}x. � v .
.;,,"'" e 'xst"s :i,, x, .� � .... r,.; Cs '•:�z 2 -.:+ 'w„i ^E`", y. ..c,.v+ s "E
p-;, x :.,:.,.+ xa F Y,.fy ry» ,-i"' ,.. �r. a .x . ..: r , ....: ,+i i . ..,, .*r . ,. '..,... .L :, • .x•- .
. ' �f"` a . .S . y+i,.. i .. m 5 n° ... ,y...x.; � , ' $<E,Ns ,`. r.; � �s'.. af,` xt.
i ..... r„ :, ,, :. s s . �, yu +.. , z. ,.. Axsa� . .n,. . , t .,v 1: , .e. S. , . ... . r .«F ,�.. m .
,.- .n,., . , . .,:. , :. ,,, '. .:"v�+- ,..a . .,at e x,: .. "t✓ P 1* t.s.. a c. BNY. x e.
+� �,e, r< � � w. ., a < ,,�;• F r � » 4� : ' T > .44 ^, � - ��*f'�a
s \'� 4p f v, '$" ^t ' � F{t r
z _
RESOLUTION NO . 2001 - 056
Policv 1 .43 : Development in transitional residential areas shall be limited to the following :
Single - Family Residential Uses
up to I unit/acre: or up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects
Recreational Uses
up to 0 . 35 FAR
Public Facilities
up to 0. 35 FAR
Institutional Uses
u to 0. 35 FAR
Schools ( not including_ business and vocational schools )
up to 0 . 35 FAR
Excavation Activities
_gricultural Uses ( as permitted in Future Land Use Element Policy 6 . L
The FAR of mixed use projects shall be calculated by assigning a portion of the total development area
to each use . The sum of the portions assigned to each use must equal the total development area An
exception shall be allowed for accessory residential uses within primarily non-residential projects That
exception shall allow the entire development area to be used to calculate the number of units allowed a
without restricting the amount of development area available for calculating the maximum FAR for
primary uses .
Policy 1 .44 : To mitigate and reduce potential impacts between residential and agricultural uses the
following special regulations apply within areas designated as Transitional Residential :
Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants will be prohibited on T designated land
When platting lots in residential projects on T designated land the land owner must place a
statement on the plat and on the deed of each lot . That statement must notify the lot buyer of the
Florida Right to Farm Act and that active agricultural operations occur nearby .
1
t
CODING : Deletions are indicated by strife-throughrs ; additions are shown as double underlined .
JUNE 59 2001 ,
- 77 -
, �r�. m.r z{< 5-. ex x. fr ,r.. t '� i d us ,4' •.' -r �i F aR` � s'#t x^ .rak ' �y i ,a+
- i x °w
' S. k
x.
.d. . tt„ •„ . . . _ . ,� . , . . , :# , . , a . .., : . ,.ry .., ,... a , �, , ., ,. ,.. - 9` .r e?:#14
« >~:n �, : . s .,
x. s ,S . „# . ., v,, h, ,r ,�. k"``n• �x y . . . er=d., :- ,.x oa�:.a�. .. ,.,: b�:o: t e �
?C i. .xF' ..:. .., e # .., > , . . $ tXy� w 3vg, t' .`. 'ry � . . ..w2 v5... �+
,«. f'' .% §'h '«;. .� 1rx ,`?, 5c. . �$ � K A•�t` 3A.
F.,>t;•>~ -,I . ..s. . - .. " „�-' , ,,',. �.. ,,;.,fty.v ,:r.-. ,7 t, , . < .:: �€ :.,. v .- n . s.
.a' , ..' . . _. €
h;Lr....
e ._
:s k' .., . :n . . -v.,, i , ,,3.. . .{ , "s”-a `". . ,• . nx e - "�Y+§ „r.T. Y�r<.> r t . .,.. ., f
-,:-5^ "A & .x,...:. ., x :�.:> r ::.:. v4 }'i . , 4 film ^.,.
,, ex;. x ,✓,.. 3 n r t s,>fi i a. A ,. ..: Y , � ,f>:..- _ .. 'M ,.r: r,
x .x.. . `fir,, ., ,, x .. . . :nz ... . i i'� .
y. .} ;..,Xr 'r 'rj».. 5 s. . '�. ♦ - 4.� F ;T�!�., t 'r't''',g,..s r`c� � �m,. m., ". r ... q � >r 2 x '.
k s �r ,
't.- a 'v„ 41, .. is , -. ,. � 1:.,� ., er . .: .,...,.. x. y , ,,.•s. .. .. - : S # F .,
'¢ .t. . .x m s :sS^ ,v^ii �&...; t � vh�s s t s,.:.,r`.� e r�,
v .,. i. �# $}��:^+ a3 . .:. ;i7 .. „ .^. . X, , s. .C.. X ^'4'\.ka, a v tf ' t' S. ,,.- ^.; .: 1x r
x �. ,:.:: a 'Vt.. , . •s+' �uY+'s £ ,X:. 4 s �=;Yz St ,ash' r.-.:,k r < @5. z 7c jr � r
ry
If
I If If
f
tr33d91
9 .
$ . . ..
kk
If
N
�. R ? =.k.
S
���� 'o� 5 I 43kCy
s �>
xwN,� � �
fA v' W
14
M f
rev xxA +�5
N, INI
r
y M 19,
.. y
If
S, �N��
1,-
I
N
C a f x
3SII Q�XIhI
,' 11"Iff";I
J2I _m C� If
If-
O
r
1Cl
ILI, ana u
I / J of y,
I' ft�:A - 3 t ° T
Ln
cu
W T —AI 3 o
a
ri
`l \ ` ` ` ` � Y
b A.. l ) 1 1 ) - J`
S Q W w
tr �. W V Ca T — Z
za W > > s 00
Ohio
u cn z N Q Q
111ITI 19,
Fb ' W h Z — JCCV
a �:
If,
i
J Z - J
- Ey f% ILL
} cu
T - J fA da vtfy 3F ^ *k
if LI
� otz � st0 butuoz r' '? A c N cn
a Q d �d a c� z a L a w w o p
a a
oOlt
it
if
It
x
�v. ..<.J . ,. ,. p. v + , r r :a+• ..Y. efN , .,Fx -� ...£ 4 . . .h.x: # k
._..x. : .. , : ,. _ .a �, ,. . u's.' ,ry k. . Su`, . a : : .0-- : . a ., . ..:.` x ,.-..; < •..
�• Fi'..r.,. .,'St c ,. `s'' a«r„..�. `•5, k „x""x :: ��'^ h 'z.
zr .+.rs:., . , t . _ fr. .,� . . , c. >� .L , :. < k. .<Ci. a . ,E1 , . .. .:x ,.,. ._ ., •:. . . . ..,v.
,., _:, hs „ Y . :. .>!. . 'x' ra: m..1 +..:. ,a �, .
, . .• y „yv ,. _. . .. '. x . . 4 b�3,w . x x..,.... k. m :: ..., C � _„✓.„ ,. . v.. W
. � ' , �.. .: 3., `S ..., � � c. {
. . E . .. ,. . ,�; � a, >� ,':�' -x 3•- .,. ., -- s .., u <. ,. . .• .. . ,..,.. � } .. +
r, ?^m , v +. ..- � ,- }. s' :=.a: P n +�"r_ 3 �.;t,.v �>�,,;, ,, .-.s" i a, <s.^ s - -.,” -x
.. . s. .. ,. �x, ,; ,. „:, � 3 , ; . ;: � g tl`,•:,.,, ay 3 a kr,; < . ? ..
� . .ii'^�;, w`<�,�, � -;
a „-Y,,... „* ,,: > .. � ,..: .. .. .,•`;•. � {:,, v � na.u, e i='F'; '� T, 4 "'`' >z
�teCS. r , . :? . . .d. '� i
a {#, .. ,: ,* . ,. . y :£ x{ % . , :-».. x•n - ,.z � '� ,., , . 'Jn '` ,c rid' S.:_
t ..^wi S'� , .� ..c r , .�, ,: x.H.
. . ,€: . ,.., . ! o-s , ,.,''. . s"_, . ,. . Ys,. :.:.. -:«, .- :t �,,, ^;,.. „a y t < r : x
..:^� µs 't. � ✓ ,,xs.�' `df �;rt 'i'♦ 4 ;,.?,, i ,yx td �
Y x :,<-^"y' M 'Rfi � .! £ t _ ' . � 4Zr x. u. , �i , ' F'cY?� . ...,r �'-•'. t . . :dam+ G cit [,�{
k..: ,{' uvt , t .a '�, ik��";'u�4 .1�i:j' i`'^ Y31a Cr" t a,tir� i a
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -056
LAND USE DESIGNATION
f-i N rn H N M fx q FII
U U U FC FC FC �7 U a
(] W
� k
� H
G
O
N
CN ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ y}4 . .
CL ✓ ✓
CG ✓ ✓ ✓
CH ✓ ✓
IL ✓ ✓
IG ✓ ✓
CON- 1 ✓
CON-2 ✓
CON-3
CRVP
R-SCID
ROSE-4 ✓ 14
AIR- 1 ✓ Ij
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
PD ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ - District permitted
T - District permitted when used as transition from less intense/dense development or consistent with
existing development
Shaded - District not permitted
t ,
4
CODING : Deletions are indicated by stri+ce4h?0 ghs; additions are shown as double underlined .
JUNE 59 2001
- 79 -
r N ��u 'T"�' ria°+• ,L;,s. f" ' , :anyy t. ona;,.s^ 'u' s .Ftinip, a" -a,,..?� G- <-; r rF kv 5 r ,:; r
yrsp
L X . �},,?' >. fr 3 {9�<` ��, r;' �; �u ,,:s.•:, .•m t x c� .� t n x. x y #`' E. .
i r .;J x�. a r �. "`J rv£a Z ,a i;;:.. t
t ,. x s F' ,. ;: ' ,' ., :! o- �•.. v . , . , �, ^3 r T� t.,. , , , w:. . ;est -
is £ .Y v`
,l J..:.y iY,4�•Ys <# J-.ty�,x{ ' `9y ,+ . w ;;. . . 'R :.:•K,Yr Nx F> . . ...
y t. . ,. . ,,, n»z �•.� < JK,y. , Y l >3,4 .-. � M ,. . ,:,. < z,,,: � ,.,.. „3
...,.. . -. Y"?: ., .. .nt , . #z. Y•�° ,. . ., , , r y� r. :x _. w:�, .E-:. S 1 «;.., �
e ::
^t ,,.. 4 ,.;s. '. ? 4, , _ r:= t ,`t ru Pyv.,. •nr. l �.d r',-Y,d
r
. "r; , $ .. d ,•u . ._ r .r „ w v , s : ,,..
= C b.^. ;k yr tx F"cu8 . . . +s,' d' ;hk� r- r xs u�rsx° s ?�.5 `3 ?
� 5
bb
.,✓r .; r s -...: ?`; .ry + / x._ v tr. se +;. . d• x 'X 4 + ' 1; G;a > :.k a 4fi , 4::r`
r *, rr,3 .. e>r2 •Ey:. rr'"
n +, . . v ,�, e r�. :,� u..fl. , „ T4 '4",�t� h a.'M1z , . . ry ✓ t
i Y 4 . .. v Y 'v. g.s,.. ! t r 3A a*, ; f2'�o . r t x.- ff
-
, ,. ,.< .. ...$.� L , �x$. Y"S ate . .�* , •., . . b`.=:-�:.. ,5' r la, < .; Y.: ,.-, ";,. ,. r+ A .'
ro c . .'x.�.a a:.r< +. '�� i -z�`.4 °t ,. a ' . o ,a �
, r .<.. .. ,. ,v.. -;,< . .. z +� s;< , « ._., .,.., a .'� . ,. �.,,. ,...c..✓Jxu�,.,. 3m...
dRssa^. fZ10,
r, , r s. ' , r a ,.. -ae «uti- A;": t :ir';.'. , max=il,.« . :.'s :s s a ,:,:; . . •¢ .,.. . t.,. b.
r e : ,< {r~ Y
s n " :: ,.. . . �ft+x . k , : _ .,,,, s /r„-„ ,..; r•. v* , 3g ;�E, .. .3. >; . s, r x . .,. �
>. <,. ., .: a ,.::,:. 'r ✓' a +� 3t r "�-.- ✓ z z t�.'v' s�>��. f,..
'� ., . :u'4 .., .., t,5 , .4i .tu. -. Ax ,si” : ,<. <, . ,a•,l5 :m,:. ... .,:�.... .... . �... ....K r ..:. � 5 x ...
s ".'-, ,< , +, �.: .. = .s >, 3 F's �uhw..,:..—,. .?.;, v+ _<%s k s ,
't M
. s > ;. , ,, . . , . r. 4: „, �, aw= ar, ;e � s ,2 .• .1 rvw .. k 't`rT� }KYz^'m +55s..�"3* a^rv�Ts m. ,..Y:"<��
„ -,. ` , s "+. � � ie t ! al x"",Ei �'�`sd`�`'}� ,.`�"A. h,:;g +.'�z R
9 . A . 4 , PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION 2001 - 057
APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS
REVIEW (TO REDESIGNATE ± 164 , 1 ACRES FROM AG
1 TO T AND TO EXPAND THE URBAN SERVICE AREA
TO INCLUDE THOSE ± 164 . 1 ACRES) Q GERALD
CLONTZ - ±30 . 8 Acres , 2 . BEUTTELL DEVELOPMENT
LLC . - ±76 . 8 Acres , AND 3 . INDIAN RIVER EXCHANGE
PACKERS , INC . AND MIRAFLORES , INC - ± 56 . 5 Acresl
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TFIE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 29 , 2001 : I
TO : James E. Chandler; Countv Administrator
D A TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
obert I. Keating, AICP; ommunit Development Director
f
THROUGH : Sasan Rohani, AICP ; Chie , Long- nge Planning S
s '
, t
FROM : John Wachtel; Senior Planner, Long-Range Planning 4)
DATE : May 29, 2001
RE : County Initiated Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate
±164. 1 Acres from AG- 1 to T. and to Expand the Urban Service Area to Include
Those ±164 . 1 Acres.
JUNE 5 , 2001 t
I� ► � h5j"
_ 80 -
r"
g0 -
h
iN
ru„s.r2C«v zs'az:wlnn', e,"r"t"m4F^?t',.r.d."a3p�. .xA., r' ,.w3....,r. Y,{;xr�2 ?c Yµ 4^.$,nilkt^f -",. !'^�u'? .. t,,-. x.;aL._,r�. ,.: v.t€"�k'.wa�•, Nj`'SvY'<"aiYFF.`^`k.
v.... 3 ' �
y H
ry ` ..
h
5;:.,,: . a.. b `a..s., F . < w -, :3: ,< r C .S r �.. ,.;� .,� 4` 3x ., r -,.. � ,
.ua a � m�^ •,,. �i y ;
a •w. S.s,+s; - .,s. YyS'v £.v. r 3,?' . .. ,.. .. .� x ,..m , �` - ,>t x'` ,� , ..,.: . ..::, . ,., . .., . 1. YY;:,
,, .. ; 3 ,* , > ::: .; '>• :,; & . . , r. , i - +v+. +h ns s t r -. r+
a ..
t a
~t m
f -,::. +. " 4`' • .k. ' : X' ,,.�y9^i,. �3Y' w r .:,f.>Kr ?s. .t;+�p, ? .,r.. s .. . =w S <' ._
. r „. < 3..,{ £'
"5 t ? i "�:: , v '. ;�` ? . .^": 3�� z. ,S ., u , x L t i Y : "Y d st ,%};
!S .s "" ¢s J• � F z
. ,._ a:,,,w.4. . .�.`t.�`,?3,r,. Y�.�`..''�,'��^.,.s=.�.*� « �i��Gar`..,, ,<afv a.. rcbka%sx _ �n5u.`r'<>•x? .+ '++, , . ;. .. ? , . >�=+s's . .. ✓.
„ � zx". , ac , . . �, . .z _ , . . , u �: < _. n . .. . .z . a . . -.,.:.P F . ,rz .. > , .,. i„i'<*r.�� , , , s. . _>:_ `
n .. ..�"..� ,c,`.,, ... 3- e;.im , e b , ,. ..„ l12
. . . ,.,,'�rn < h ..
,.,. . ;..�' tiK,;. ... . '.fr %fl.. - ,. . « t � � rs, ', n'i �. .b"x`�" ms .,+, .,�.. . ..., . . , :- a , ,. .; ,
w :, ':, n ";:, rt, :'- „a° ',':, - F.a,. s, a. '; , x "� ♦ "i } a a*
:�Y � ,s�'� .�..�. 'A« � b ,�,y x o- ,r«,4:tir r T sv s r ':: lz' r , t k,. , , m �1'ma+
§"`S; s'i k.a ✓ g .,{Y: x xue, " P' r
'i ^' . - . s io . s,u.:: xg, "�'a�; � — m >m � � � �r" x J. �,. " " }3 `v,^C u'� . ' ( a. = •
ory i,.,,+z 1, , v ? z i- .,�v,
Al
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER : LURA 2001 -01 -0110
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of Countv
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 5 , 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate approximately 164 . 1 acres from
AG - 1 , Agricultural - 1 ( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) , to T. Transitional Residential ( up to 1 unit/acre : or up
to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects ) ; and to expand the Urban Service Area ( USA ) to
include those 164. 1 acres . The subject properties consist of three non-contiguous sites . No rezoning
is associated with this request . The purpose of this request is to provide relief to owners of
agriculturally designated land located adjacent to the USA, where that land, because of its proximity
to urban development, can no longer feasibly be used for agricultural purposes .
At the June 5 , 2001 , Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Board, prior to considering this
land use amendment, will consider a text amendment that is closely related to this land use
amendment . That text amendment involves the issue of whether or not to establish a new T land use
designation, and if so, how should it be structured . For that reason , the text amendment decision will
significantly affect which land use amendment alternative the Board may choose . Clearly , the Board
cannot redesignate land to the T designation unless the Board first approves a text amendment
establishing the T designation . Similarl % , the characteristics of the chosen T designation will
determine which land may be given that designation .
On April 5 , 2001 , the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the Board
of County Commissioners not amend the Comprehensive Plan at this time ( Alternative 3 ) .
On May 17 , 2001 ,
the Professional Services Advisory Committee voted 8 to 0 to recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners chose Alternative 2 , Staff s Transitional Land Use Designation
Proposal .
This request is to redesignate three separate sites containing a total of 164 . 1 acres . The three sites
are referred to as Subject Properties 1 , 2 , and 3 , and are depicted in Figures 1 through 6 . Subject
Properties 1 , 2 , and 3 are related to the O ' Haire text amendment proposal because they are the only
properties in the county that meet the T designation requirements of the O ' Haire text amendment
proposal .
dotted areas on Figure 7 .
Another alternative that will be presented in this staff report involves the properties shown in the
Those properties , consisting of ±892 acres , are related to the staff
developed text amendment proposal because they are the only properties that meet the T designation
requirements of the staff developed T desicr text amendment proposal .
Subject Property 1
Depicted in Figures I and 2 , Subject Property 1 is owned by Gerald R . Clontz, is 30 . 8 acres in size , t
and is located at the southwest corner of 58 `h Avenue and the Main Canal
t' .
JUNE 59 2001
nu
- sl -
. r
✓ +fizT� - . wg" � '' yy , t� �`d"` '(q,- d y.f, : t ,.,r,' J r '� i tv ,*' ; x,
' 3 4� , .3a.,.. .,gun"
t ..k `?cmxt+l_ .". . �' _, > :. .t„ < ,.a'., r -:s.. ca s�xr,-%�-x(~. , . � «•: e,.�.. -�. . ,,.ck � r , , r . ,.. .3
, . .,.,, ' ''. -
,,: s; .., Vit°. . L . . .. x�t, ,. .. >ii,=< � . .. ' . ,'Y'm# r : :.-.. a.. .v. . f.. ,� .:..rt ;_:;
s .' . ,.,.i ehvrk , ', a tx :✓ ri ,., c2 ivy°'..". :. �ev` � Y ; :. .., k'x "-�. / '.: + ,'..
W ,z s - ... t' .r . r ?„;. }: .. . �$• v ss '� :',y`g, enS"s„ ro"�a, fir' s x ,„..,. ,w, , t” - '� ,.. t. S
,, , e .r 5 .,ad t r a ,. dq t s. x: s r ", :.: ,4 �F ii .Y r. st r r
t ,i o a: i'.� �a - � r.,4,.n °"d .z� "§i .x•.'�iYf^, `4�>` SN4.`y �5 ..,:;,a*' ,n . +., .: e b . . S.. a s .. ,,.. f
a;,, a v.:, w. 4 � +., .�3=-, {t -;. f
l
..`,t .,. :. s aTa �`”' t-J'g ,�"( � 2r'�rs i - n ., r"s ti `+ �r $,�,(, "{- ,,".':FFw 3+ r , .,r,: s �. "-' 1 ,
. > a a ... s ". v x,t... ✓ ' t ' �" ` • 3--s t < ^F ",t' v'd" v fis ..`jai. Y x s. . „,., n . y
qr 1 ,� y n iX.+r, 3 4 a'a+ eF ' Y, a '.r R,yy ^z d e.,» y ..Y. . . .�a .+,• , ', ::
, x ...:- . . , x y s M; •s^:,. x ," .: ? \ :ty. ,t
e
k,"a:: ,il. .. r , t , 'r•. R 5+-�. g.. : kc . . . v... . y e ,..
: ry, .: ,. *a. t t 'teK r . e s 6 ,�;. . r 4a- r 5 a- ldas +, JY/
r 5. ::
l e„ .f' v. t tr ... Y c ": e `L a'
., F 't .,i 1 ye ry ` $ s , ., ` §
r ey; ,. „nka. LA;`•.r w' s'�:-w�r�1 r`R+J &ry t ,+%i. z,.;. ... ^ ./e<r .r; r Srx;: r .� ^ I 4 r "t,
s a t ➢ F i a Fa t, f ,r p tis i.+`"t'xro ri,rr- + �.ry -":.Y r c „ x s
a'-..s : .I g 4 .::: x ;' ='.z. w. x Y ,�r .a �s rl x ,;+� -s, a-. +ti' ?
,,e c 's ,.E s
. x, . .ga'a < , > a ., .t r k , �,a e , Aire 7 :o5v. *" x ::^,rr w '.
xa
r'I .. ....- � 1�- i' `vr • .R :v: . /G 4 �' ::i. ^✓-5 , ',,f`$ ��'4� •;(.
„cY *k;zk
Figure 1 : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 1
Tffi3 --
.�_
�- �C / Mair
M1 - ( i
Gana i L - 1
— 1 th treet
C
L A • •X E
N
AG - 1u �
TR.5 TR.6
TR7 RB t L - 1
Figure 2 : Location and Zoning of Subject Property 1
--
• -ram - - - - -T .
a C Ma�� r
o ,
RM - 6
RS -2 0 -
Mair Gamma\ i - • . - ,
4 . TR13
R2
TR8 •� ,.� TR.o TRo
` z A - 1
e
t
JUNE 5 , 2001 _
! 3 `
R /�/ t
" VL —
F
t
�•; F 4
s>x.. la Fra. nhi „"N- + a
'., '�"`�. , rt'a' x' Y,etr ..Y"rcS.� K x ':,.> i K. tjrx�.k 1 k 'x1Y /' a
;. •rF1,�3 E' ,rsy, �F+rr, 8�r; :,we �'}} '' s k>e Yf All, I
:?, rU h-.,.. a .ey.,4F '} R
e . . •, 7 y r' y F ey n t e ` n wih k. e Wim' 1
�
� ,r�. "�" x. :,,. ,...r '� ,.4. . •a S' ,._ ,,.r;. s .':', s... . k , , . �.? ;x., ":, , . ,
�, � .,v .,. �: ., t . r . � fi n..; hrt �m�Ew 'e" $na i� . ,. .a ' 3 sz* .r:�r ,rl r
a Ss •. rt ,'11 , ' k •Ta�} +t £ 5 n. .„ Yu.t� t,r, .,: "M .c a Y'. , r o-:• r v' Y rr{ 3 .. ,4M1
t ' y '„r x 2 4 x 1 .fir'. sE. ' 'vim ^F` F ! ”.
zt'".ww" r
.r a e .t.•=t v .:>a_.. '»r,� 2r =s"
,, 't
.,;..
. . 9A T of . ; .. ..-s "s . Y:en:.. i . . , . . .,:. '. e , : P `Tf t "rv .•
e 'mzi � s 'z u " •. r'
a* x .. . as t r r . !-
�y
ss,e,T . er..f-�, e .�. %Cr w.v�ti .tt ,..kfas.�e`�"+k- .,+,...r-�_�.„'o,>� t` i� s� . rewv, < ,n,. ,.:. r4 _tea , ., r . . . . _
_. � , . _ .< < . r , .rte . �:. , w .a r<.! . , , ,
`� Li W °�'v `:�vs§ �. Jl� � 4 � � ,. s, ++ .� .n 1za x.;'. :•.�>i �
xh txr + '.. _' t
+n ,
,•�'' � '� G ups , S e " .: ,, - +: : x G" ,. . ! �. rv,.. u : 4
r - „. „ , a+ ' a?''bpi a' °:li'" *'' , r�•z:.�r ikc9� .. :`,sa k .=i s. .:: ,. .:'{. . , r ., •„ :Ls
r x „»: y' y
> i ': "h x - -:', c . ••.5 w'G i•. ." $ ll "(" `: t:.x ..s t ;'i.'3 •.x N
:k :Yr V „
, .i . 5,.:4; v} "`); . � y '+ '£-�' S . cke !P ..a'Yak'§ N«`F•^M"� �.thn _: � H •a ffL - ``. 'is. .( tC , z . : ; ;:. .-e P �. , .
:� S rS, r s
k.< "'•v--'�` xxa ,. t.=. ;,z
N .-,. ».. 2 n:^r w ^.w ..•., ' "'?,: a xi= 4 ;,, �" F �Y . ;�' E k . r , .. ::
�, i`5. P._+ .» £ .�.^;' h. t }j "' +
,,. z �t.; st"s3'3. ;?ky�3a..,,„ „e �:•;� ,�£., ::k,�� » , .^ �', ';,� r
§
x
s ., �i�„` e, ,+ £^ ,.. : a" r�•€»` ' `'"»3ti' a },.. r :,?.,.xe,:� s ,r..::. 3 y E 1 +
b- x
_ _ • . �,3;'?:` *`t5 ` # s + � s*�' '"Ir J a r"s"':( a- u
ax
Subiect Property 2
Depicted in Figures 3 and 4 , Subject Propem 2 is owned by Beuttell Development. LLC , is 76 . 8
acres in size , and is located at the southeast corner of 82nd Avenue and I5t Street . SR' .
Figure 3 : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 2
T¢D - - -- -- -- — . -- I T¢J6 _ - TPLO . — _— _ — . _ _ — . - - I - - - - -- -- - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - -
I �
AG - 1 i
L - 1
l �1I T¢a Tcz
x AL AG - 1
wa
Y /
JL
Co
I . a
r¢v
• i .
JL
a L - 1
A — 1
Sth Street . W .
TRW
i I
Figure 4 : Location and Zoning of Subject Property 2
Tin : TF04
i A _ 1 i
I
A - 1
T¢.9 TLY
JL JL
M7 Awl T" M7
i .
i
IR A - 1
X i
G ' _ - -/ /
I
MOM
Sth Street .W .
TW — ---- .. .. .... TwoTP1 - -
Olt
RSml Awl
JUNE 59 2001
- 83 -
x
5,, , " '+
r _. Ktr ' ,:. }S,z � �. '_�� l .x..��'' .... =�S"'..'"r w, ��i ,s-": x� wP ,a: ,Y: v ? :. . < , x. :: . r . . �:':
rtE a . .. ;, ? a;. Ax +, t�?k x e ?aE � re:.i i. ; xr2Cs` • �' . +w :.S v � r .
�.. �.�33�TM� iw.•cc§a �F�i4y"' x � 2 �:??. y .'��:,>•- a T"{.. c� � t ; ti . t : i,� ?n { s•.<
ry r 2'.
r {:�.�. � .,a, „ ✓, r ; t. ,:t 'his "x x,,v,t- x$ f -£ . 2 ' ''"u r' x =.
a a Y°� >•xz '5.,,,a. x S ' r< s + i x' {k.m
;��•;s y �� ,,�,. v�'.�,' "r.. `?+- � � "�` s�`` %t. r��r$nn x ,
F i v\ , "X.?'3>. ':5:.urr�. . ,. �£ -�,St . S,�X�.. *,: ..E*S+ ,x-:✓:.: .,. ' ' , '.S .r r .
,,t.': '� . , . , x r ., r.; '� 't y }r+ '",�',x, s�, t t "fin ✓r
k
s r3 , 1�-. . .,. ;. #r d. n� .. rr ., ' ..x , . , :• v ;, :' s ,-..: v D 9
:�"7'
r ,` . . v:? . . z. s �"kfr,:`
s " :.i T ^ wy-,3 .,T >K k, , -.' ``rK k}�, sari y ✓� h 5 i '2wIT, t ( 4 ;; � ?., '` . e' p
y ;"». st x / '':
':i .<� ° F »�rt »'„ x ax.-r,??""m ' r*Set- w 'P a'✓.."d aSkrnr 1` x. s .P, T ,x r
. _ " r , . st ` .: t , . .,. z 4 c rn ax'n ? 7k } � ^fi '. Y ,y
3 .2:: �;Y ,i. ., r IT I
- le .. . - b
v �- F +Nr w M "�%r' * t 1 ksy,a *. , } rs^ » '8; r+ •ak k Y+:% `'" � .: +.. 5 a '
:w s r „ vz s yi xi . Vin: v .f c 'µi a , ,fiM1v jr pr
s J t
° ' t r ri. r .:. OW
r x, ;r s .. r
� . , I. $u'� 9xt�:,`` ` d,SR '. E% '` '^ r . .
r% ., t. ..i.... . ., e? . 4 ..,, ,... rn• .� �„a'' .,°�b'� '�� h�"e 6Y', "✓�. �s.'}v #.� �o-`
z ir3 � ta< y,�' .
iZ
Subject Property 3
Depicted in Figures 5 and 6 , Subject Property 3 is 56 . 5 acres in size . The northern 18 . 2 acres of
Subject Property 3 are owned by Indian River Exchange Packers , Inc . , and are located at the
southeast corner of 74' Avenue and 9' Street, SW ( Oslo Road ) . The southern 38 . 3 acres of Subject
Property 3 are owned by Miraflores , Inc . , and are located at the northeast corner of 74' Avenue and
13 ' Street, SW ( Kelly Road ) .
Figure 5 : Location and Land Use Designation of Subject Property 3
u • _- r .
C / I
Tel M4 T� I
Ta = AG4 !aL -- -., -a aC / i aTxi SD - T8A-
AG - 1 - -
- :C / I _ -
- - - - €
s
Sam
13th Sueet S.W .
. ....—
7830 , 8Y �• — - - - - - Ma - Tail
m
t LOWIL AG - 14m- .
i PUB 4 M. s
i ! a Sam mom
Figure 6 : Location and Zoning of Subject Property 3
woo __
Sam
X IL A- 1
-II • : - IH1 _ - TA1I - Ma - — T12
�Taz
IGi .
.L -- =
dammmm
UPS A- 1
WIN
JL JL Ilm mmo
TR? I - -- ma
-----r =-- --- - - Ma - Tag
Sam
r w
War
= a JL
alm IG Sam Sam
Sam
13M scree S.W. - - - -
r= I Two — I — - - -_ — Me - Tx.0
r-
A- 1
A4 t a
aSam mam
JUNE 59 2001 } .3
- 84 -
All
., s t " . s 5, .:: *n az ar f5 r�: : .x 5Tel
-
t s. r r .'M€»r.�., s t .r F e t %
r 4." }fdsµ< `„m . «xs r,, :' >e s ,E ro i.< F,„,. x .a.-..,t . ! $`i i r:'.x F ,~ti:=
s 3 2 a a
.4+� 9'.. 4.y.F ;T SSd 2":. ' l .+' .+.
h .,`, r , � sF 34' 'C"3^` .„✓<-`sr ;f''.iyrX7 SF's ` 'c3J , r ',i y ,t ,, s a ' x :, x
'n
e.0 s . < z } N x wartxz; s ,3y.c y '� rx
z . .<.„_ �! $`it-wRr`'a<�A»,?d.. > f *.. `c n "a" rSp' ,, .� , . f.",,y'x`vrN.,• \ x .i �
Till,
",Rs sd” saw s t .w nr s t
�','„'h ,w . ;N ., , a :: -, .. .._;- >r. 1 . . „,,. i �,< . . .�t _ ., v . _ , 0 . . ,. .N , ,
, ,. , .s.4.
, r. t ;. r
";: . , : s , �
s . , __} Yk . S:< q , t,: 4, ...,t .a _ '.+ .. '+ v..«s"^. i }-. S "r >• r c •r : .,c
: r 3 ,r};'
-
d�R # '�. ri ;°i :,F. 4 o- d i'r 5 tur }* ;.e % x r a } ` r 1 T ix t L iN , r✓ dy'
SY».s - Y P
�.y
1 z,. $%. # 4•r :,y� ''" ti f a": +`7A;.r 5v . xu x , r r z 3
; 5
o- x
ti3,sIf-
If
Background
In January 2000. Clontz and Beuttell submitted land use designation amendments to redesignate their
separate properties . Mr. Clontz ' s land use amendment request was to redesignate his property from
AG - 1 . Agricultural - 1 ( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) , to M - 1 . Medium - Density Residential - 1 ( up to
8
units/acre ) . Beuttell ' s land use amendment request was to redesignate his property from AG - 1 to
L- 1 , Low - Density Residential - 1 ( up to 3 units/acre ) . Both amendment applications also included
requests to expand the USA to include their properties . Both applicants , apparently coincidentally ,
retained attorney Micheal O ' Haire to present their requests to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and to the Board of County Commissioners .
On Mav 11 , 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend denial of the
Beuttell request which was subsequently withdrawn . Also on May 11 , 2000, the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend denial of the Clontz request.
9
t
Despite the negative recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. the Clontz request
was forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners which, on July 11 , 2000, voted 5 to 0 to deny
the request. Although the Board denied the request, the Board indicated a desire to "find some relief , _ .
for Mr. Clontz . " The Board also acknowledged that , because the circumstances affectins the Clontz
property were similar to the circumstances affecting many other properties in the county, action taken
on the Clontz property would have countywide implications . For those reasons , the Board instructed
staff to continue to study the issue and present alternatives to the Board . Those alternatives were t
presented to the Board and discussed at an October 9 , 2000, workshop meeting .
At the October 9' workshop , staff presented several land use and urban service area alternatives .
In addition to staffs alternatives , Mr. O ' Haire presented a proposal to the Board . That proposal
gives relief to Mr. Clontz by increasing the number of residential units that could be built on his
property . Specifically , the proposal is to establish a new T, Transitional Residential , land use
designation. This new designation would apply to land currently designated AG- 1 , Agricultural - 1
( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) , provided the following criteria are met :
1 ) The property must abut the urban service area ;
2 ) The property must abut a commercial/industrial node ;
3 ) The property must front on an arterial road ;
4) Utilities - water and sewer - must be available at the property boundary ; and
5 ) The property must be at least 20 acres
c
Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal allows T designated land to be developed with residential uses at a density
of up to 1 unit/acre, or up to 3 units/acre if the project is developed as a Planned Development ( PD ) .
Recognizing that such a proposal needed technical analysis . the Board instructed staff to review ,
analyze , and "clean-up" the proposal ; and report back to the Board . 1
z
On December 12 , 2000, staff reported back to the Board. One of staff s findings was that only three
properties in the county met all of the criteria of Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal . Those properties are the
subject properties .
At the December 12 ' meeting , staff presented several alternatives , including Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal ,
to the Board . Another alternative presented to the Board was an alternative new T. Transitional
Residential , land use designation developed by staff. The staffs T designation was structured to
more broadly address the issue of agriculturally designated land abutting boundary USA bound t
roads where
utility lines exist in the right-of-way of those roads . That alternative was intended to give relief not
only to Mr. Clontz, but also to similarly situated property owners . For that reason, the staffs T
designation alternative would apply to ±892 acres , a significantly larger area than the ± 164 . 1 acres
the O ' Haire alternative would apply to . 1
JUNE 59 2001 _
- 85 -
.. bY •ZY �,>t� e� ,� S dlig r ,.ry x yi a '?s .ri rr ^r + : .. xf rx } rFi
w `" �, §b,y;, " `ux r c* 'f"a .} ."Yr-'�?"'ti•r ,?,a .y .'19it } .r + t � �, s s 1
r 5 r �a. " � +�. :tae a ?c'
s. '. 1 v ' "- a ' r3r
Abe c e k c`, 3?
Gt, > `,3=, `h rW `' If
r`T F'' v","Fx's 3: '-n're'el„ kasx:h.'dN# ..; .,5 p '.c=. asJ�.l`s zt* .« ;r z r � 'T ✓ t - t t
3 -t s " •w b ,:,?i ,r y
a a
r far #, a ,,
, r
s
. ,, . . .. '# z. . . . . as . .. + .,�.., rc#� x ,., ...1 .,4" m `..-.c, 4 r x
,_ .. ... . . ., .
-x. �, Y `:";� r� :"- e I . f t y y ct '�n r iw t .> . c { ",S rs
u'r +. y .5 F i "tr ,`; k r.r'[ 5i �J 3i '' s ..i; t
s ; > 9x7 sx';'� trYT'vi a sy, s' Ay x _.��, u£ ..: v-a .✓ '� 3 J:.lzi t :�.:,. ',a a • , : > c
..4
i. tI'd .Y+ y r t s' 1 s Fy -#� r, y n r
1„9 n t 5 . + iT"' A .. f rpt =.sa" {4 5 , Y c. a x!. d✓� �s '"§ x ,+ :v z
c, xu , x . :�.. .; f c Y », °'< r _x(:. r s
{ c- : ..Y 5 . h .a £: . fiI I3 A rsv. . LL a x "» r wy , t
'a'" ,' . : "} 'x,f . -. .> " Y ? ' s+ ?' '� ` *Pivt • vs .` ' • '$'"
�.> . 1 , . . . C :.e- a *, z�3,,,v, %� <�. �r 'ai 5*:��^ NC.r «t r ."MYs'1::'>11
^T�' ? q � r'" 3�, R .,ot,. S
' . , ro. -a� a . :
The areas affected by the staff s proposed T designation , depicted in Figure 7 , are located in the
following three quarter-mile wide corridors :
• ±412 acres along the west side of 58 "' Avenue, from the Main Canal to 8 " Street, and from
4" Street to 9' Street, SW;
• ±400 acres along the east side of 82 "d Avenue , from 16" Street to 5i° Street, SW ; and
• ±80 acres along the east side of 74' Avenue , from 9' Street, SW to 13 ' Street. SW.
Seeking additional public input, particularly from the Planning and Zoning Commission. the Board
instructed staff to process a county initiated text amendment and a county initiated land use
amendment implementing Mr. O ' Haire ' s proposal . The Board, however, stated that it did not wish
to preclude the Planning and Zoning Commission from considering any alternatives , and that the
Board would consider any alternatives recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission .
Figure 7 : Staff' s Proposed Location of the T Land Use Designation
ILI
t '
r
126TH T,
UJ I16TH ST.
. . . . .
• lead
a Ir
:
: : :.
•
was
•
sea
aa
•
• me m
as
LM
I
5 , QQLWTV LII
JUNE 59 2001 � � 1 .
4 E. ,
1
- 86 -
IRd i1 f 1' 5 {{ Y l
i
-
x� n r s � 4 y r ) x t � { *f u ` P� ✓. su.r1 { ..
s xy .�' " w s �?s E Ra. 4. v ?,+ '- vtt r a s
J '+y £. -,, .+ d �. �y ?�"{t x�a`r'fi3. fl dry . T Y� .r` h y :3 f Y S
4 i' :% y. y< �' < ' N '.Y si :. Y ( v t it k l PYY Y '^� { f' yt E
yYd titl
x ,
iddl-'S° K.6 ::� s'+"« � ,,.✓t -t. .„SK;.�ias"+ a e '" „.wee r n ° ,, r rdid
F ra ., TM�%s '" X` 'f #*y y '4 ,'-. ,� t ,� :x s s ai .,' "1 '.s
. . .x ,. s , .Cvt` . , v 3 #. ,:.,.. . , �. d a
A t Y,� k i:, a tfno-' S s + s '3 .+, ✓ ` r:, .
T :$ ^ ::Y x > ' �i` Y,, fvw �x "i. �.i 3 s x .' i { a fi r �, t R k t r5
sem,
,a k ) ,, -d,.? yx 'yh �.' nk, xr-s a ., r 'sss + s s ci a i` ,< 4 . s .' z . 1 :.•
4 e :k tf rr .{ `� .. k r aSv 2y,
dI
In
,x .< „#, - £ ..
r
N I n6
Iv
In
11 71 tt .
r.,
% + , .i
v
�
r � F
Board of County Commissioners Responsibility
With respect to this issue , the Board of County Commissioners , at the June 5 , 2001 meeting , will
first consider several text amendment alternatives . The text amendment decision will significantly
affect which land use amendment alternative the Board may choose . Specifically , the O ' Haire text
amendment alternative is implemented by the O ' Haire land use amendment alternative , and the staff
proposed text amendment alternative is implemented by the staff proposed land use amendment .
Equally important is the fact that the O ' Haire proposal and the staff proposal are mutually exclusive .
Existing Land Use Pattern
All the subject properties are zoned A - 1 , Agricultural District ( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) .
Subject Property 1
Subject Property 1 consists of citrus groves and a residence in the northwestern part of the site . West
of the subject property , land is zoned A - 1 and contains residences on 10-acre , heavily wooded lots .
South of the subject property , land consists of citrus groves and is zoned A- 1 . East of the subject
property , across 58 " Avenue , land is zoned RS - 2 , Single - Family Residential District ( up to 2
units/acre ) . That land consists of Kingswood Estates , a subdivision of single- family residences , on
the south side of 16' Street, and citrus groves on the north side of 16' Street. The Main Canal
borders the subject property on the north .
Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 consists of a mix of wooded pasture , native uplands , wetlands , and ponds . North
of Subject Property 2 is A- 1 zoned rangeland . West of the site , land is zoned A - I and contains a
pasture and non-commercial stable , and a garage workshop that is accessory to a single - family
residence . The eastern portion of the Indian River Aerodrome , a subdivision of single - family
residences on large lots , extends to the southwest corner of 5 `" Street, SW and 82nd Avenue . That
subdivision is zoned Air- 1 , Airfield/Residential District. South and southeast of the site . land
consists of citrus groves and pasture land and is zoned A- 1 . f
d" -
On the south side of V Street, SW is a ±40 acre tract bounded on the west by Subject Property 2 .
That ±40 acre tract consists of six :t5 -acre parcels and one ± 10-acre parcel . Those parcels are zoned
A- 1 and are used primarily for residential purposes , although the ± 10-acre parcel also contains citrus
groves .
Subject Property 3
Subject Property 3 consists of two parcels . The northern 18 . 2 acre parcel contains a packinghouse
and citrus groves . The southern 38 . 3 acres consists of citrus groves .
West of the site , land is zoned IG , General Industrial . and contains a series of packinghouses . East
of 74' Avenue , in this portion of the county . land is zoned A - 1 . Citrus groves exist to the south of
the site and to the east of the southern portion of the site . A mix of pasture and wooded land exist
to the south and east of the northern portion of the site .
The Staff Alternative to Mr. O ' Haire ' s Proposal
Generally , the areas between 58 `" and 82nd Avenues , south of 16`" Street, consist of a mix of citrus
groves , pastures , packinghouses , wooded areas , residences on large lots , and institutional use such
as churches and private schools . In the areas affected by staff s alternative to Mr. O ' Haire ' s '
proposal , residential uses dominate . The frequency and density of those residential projects tends
to decrease as the distance south of SR 60 increases .
JUNE 59 2001
- 87 -
r . n a � ,�. : dez�uvr�� 4 �u'L'fi `aTTX vv 1{ sr,� k3 ro� �k4 s a � �" 9 .r X . i . . . ✓ �
a +g r 1Yr'�.,, X`n { ? f {
`xr � k 5s^ ..^'*f M4 a"`. � 1`1F�4 p ': '44 l r 2� f f r � Z s � r v �' r.
t '• � h „"a � '� � t a .9
r xY "xA nese d r , ' m, t ,1 '.ya + » z �.,
x y „ . ,t 5 s' t ? r
> 11 - t 3
t _ . x
F
� ,`;, tis ! n •4x, 3x; n, , ^ka r; ,Ncr .>L "'k I'z e r _� � < ; a :' S ' ry11 1
< x r 3` + r.;rzf t'
_"..''.As" t'"., k.°&x.:`'."+�>.:,<, .Cir n"x'_ y ,i x s 5x ,�'s. -h1 ` X ` Yw'', ' ,n , t.. x+. _ '-kxtra•3"Ar a
tX .d $r>< tIr
; x
. tx �` <
s
Future Land Use Pattern
Subject Property 1
Subject Property 1 and land to the south and west are designated AG- 1 , Agricultural - 1 , on the
county ' s future land use map . The AG - 1 designation permits agricultural uses and residential uses
with densities up to 1 unit/5 acres . To the north of the subject property, across the Main Canal, land
is designated C/I , CommerciaVIndustrial . The C/I designation permits various commercial and
industrial zoning districts . To the east of the subject property , across 58 ' Avenue, land is designated
L- 1 , Low- Density Residential - 1 . The L- 1 designation permits residential uses with densities up to
3 units/acre .
Subject Property 2
Subject Property 2 and land to the north and east are designated AG- 1 . To the west of the site, across
82nd Avenue , land is designated L- 1 . Land to the south of the site is designated C/I .
Subject Property 3
Subject Property 3 and properties to north, south, and east are designated AG- 1 . Property to the west
of Subject Property 3 , across 74' Avenue, is designated C/I .
The Staff Alternative to Mr. O ' Haire ' s Proposal
The west side of 58" Avenue , south of the Main Canal , is generally designated AG- 1 . The
exceptions are between 4' Street and 8' Street ( the area of the Pine Tree Park Subdivision ) , which
is designated L-2, Low-Density Residential - 2, and 40 acres just south of 4" Street, which is
designated R, Rural Residential. The L- 2 designation permits residential uses with densities up to
6 units/acre, while the R designation permits residential uses with densities up to 1 unit/acre .
Land located at the northwest and northeast corners of the Main Canal and 58" Avenue is designated
C/l . Land along the east side of 58 " Avenue , between the Main Canal and 13 ' Street, SW , is
designated L- 1 . South of 13 ' Street, SW , land along the east side of 58 ' Avenue is designated AG -
Land along the east side of 82nd Avenue, from 16" Street to 5`" Street, SW, is designated AG- 1 . Land
at the northeast and northwest corners of 16' Street and 82' Avenue , and along the west side of 82"d
Avenue, south to 8' Street, is designated M- 1 , Medium-Density Residential- 1 . The M - 1 designation
permits residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre .
The west side of 82 "d Avenue from 8" Street to south of 5' Street, SW, is designated L- 1 . The south
side of 5' Street, SW, east of 82 "d Avenue is designated C/I .
South of 16" Street, the entire east side of 74' Avenue is designated AG- 1 . The west side of 74' � .
Avenue , between 91" Street, SW and 131" Street, SW is designated C/I .
Environment
i
It is likely that the subject properties contain some upland and wetland habitat. In fact, land along
the west side of 58' is within a flood hazard area. According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps , that
area is within an "AE" 100 year floodplain, with a minimum base flood elevation requirement of 23
feet NGVD . The subject sites along 82"d Avenue and along 74" Avenue are not within flood hazard
areas .
JUNE � , 2001 ` b 1
W
F
S
- t a
i � "' 3 .aFg .iss}' >; YR ✓"
a v '<" 3:°} ��R �' S .� kM s 't,yx� ✓ rz~nrer s g ti,i s 5 � �� s , _
,f,,f t p
fT".x � ..
-fi
;h a + a s i
a# r l i �d _
If
1< t _
y if
E Ic,s v f" :b Y 1
, - T< Ai "
. u x:.. ms
a
.' a..,">#`uy
. „- ., a .rc �y.- 't i ri✓1 . 1x ),x . 14..a#' � x... '1 ....t`t{� fi � F =i!
� y� � _ U*?. ,t; .:
Utilities and Services
Potable water distribution lines from the South Count} Reverse Osmosis Plant are in the richt -of-
way , or are planned to soon be in the right-of- way , of 82 "° Avenue , 58 " Avenue , and 74" Avenue ,
adjacent to the subject properties . Wastewater collection lines from the West Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant are in the right-of- way , or are planned to soon be in the right-of- way , of 82nd
Avenue , 58 " Avenue , and 74" Avenue , adjacent to the subject properties .
Transportation System
Classified as an urban principal arterial road on the future roadwav thoroughfare plan map , the
portion of 58 ' Avenue that is between the Main Canal and 12 " Street is a four lane paved road with
approximately 120 feet of existing public road right-of- way . The portion of 58 " Avenue between
12 " Street and 9' Street, SW is programmed for expansion from two to four lanes in the summer of
2001 .
The segment of 74' Avenue between 9"' Street. SW and 13' Street, SW is classified as a rural major
collector road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map . A two lane paved road with
approximately 30 feet of existing public road right-of- way , there are currently no plans for expansion
of this road.
Classified as a rural principal arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map , 82 "d
Avenue , between 5 " Street , SW and 16 " Street, is a two- lane road with approximately 60 feet of
public road right-of- way . As a possible location for the proposed Citrus Highway ( running through
Martin , St . Lucie , and Indian River Counties , the Citrus Highway would provide citrus hauling
trucks a direct link between groves , packinghouses , and markets ) , 82 "d Avenue is programmed for
expansion to 136 feet of public road right-of- way and four lanes by 2020 .
ANALYSIS
In this section , an analysis of the reasonableness of the land use amendment request will be
presented . Specifically , this analysis will address :
• the request ' s impact on public facilities ;
• the request ' s consistency with the county ' s comprehensive plan ;
• the request ' s compatibility with the surrounding area ;
• the request ' s potential impact on environmental quality ; and
• site development options .
Concurrency of Public Facilities
Although the subject application is for 164 . 1 acres , the Board of County Commissioners instructed
staff to also include and analyze the 892 acre option . For the concurrency analysis , county
regulations call for the use of the option with the greatest impacts . For that reason , the 892 acre
option will be used for the concurrency analysis .
F
The subject properties are located outside of the county Urban Service Area; therefore , they are not
currently suited for urban scale development . Regardless , the Comprehensive Plan establishes
minimum development standards for: Transportation , Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste ,
Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3 . 1 ) . The adequate provision of these services is
necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community . The Comprehensive
Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs ) require that new development be reviewed to €
ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained .
JUNE 59 2001
F
6 2
- s9 - .
s + ` +:. '1 r is S #
If
If
'•
I fe 'p `
17
s
} ..>n: k43 i" 2 ' a . . o {Xµk:u`�. .. {•., y, ,uif` -.:_ i
fi'3
..... , . ..... Y . > 3.. .
> K `FG�
Policy 3 .2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, conditional concurrency review is required .
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects , county
regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject
property based upon the requested land use designation . For residential Comprehensive Plan
amendment requests , the most intense use (according to the County ' s LDRs ) is the maximum
number of units that could be built on the site , given the size of the property and the maximum
density under the proposed land use designation . The site information used for the concurrency
analysis is as follows :
1 . Size of Area to be Redesignated : ±892 acres
2 . Existing Land Use Designation : AG- 1 , Agricultural- 1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres)
3 . Proposed Land Use Designation : T, Transitional Residential ( up to 3 units/acre)
Ile I
4 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Current Land Use Designation : 178 Single-Family Units
5 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Land Use Designation : 2,676 Single-Family Units
Transportation
As part of the concurrency review process , staff analyzes the number of peak hour/peak season/peak
direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the
proposed land use designation, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined
in section 910. 09(4) (b)3 of the county ' s LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5 % )
or more of the project traffic or fifty (50 ) or more project trips , whichever is less . 4
According to staff' s analysis , the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 2 . 676 single - family units on the subject
properties . Attachment 2 of this staff report contains a more detailed transportation concurrency
analysis .
Water
With the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, the subject property could accommodate 2 , 676
single - family residential units , resulting in water consumption at a rate of 2 ,676 Equivalent
Residential Units (ERU) , or 669,000 gallons/day . This is based upon a level of service of 250
gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property would be served by the South County
Reverse Osmosis Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 4,500,000 gallons/day
and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendment.
Although plant capacity is sufficient, county utilities staff has indicated that the long- term capacity
of the distribution system ( i .e . , pumping capacity ) could be impacted by the proposed amendment .
Staff will need to closely monitor and plan for growth in this area .
JUNE 5 , 2001 , 1t r`
- 90 -
R
`• TRK x F` �i v^sn xiir. itfl xf :k - wrx n" "S7VF�7=l ell-t777 Ile—
E �. .;r
iIF
x . { xIle
It ell
r o- t lelee
Ile,
Ile
i lI ell,
ee, 4 i
T S re . "Pe x
Ile �, d" Y n u ,gyp t ,fl :"' 'R ry r ll
" i s ; y + r i
u' . a,. u . >. . . , +au „: . . _ -u , . n... .. . , . _ . v , n< , . r« cr;. _
r .r ,
x
v 5}
r + '� z t
e}.,.
.. .
. . .:. , .r . .='t�s.,.; w r,�5.' , ,�`' ,.e, ,.. >asa . ,*,!�, ., ; .�'' � vy,r ,.Y "'zn �'.�'. , y ;'z g. .. , .rr, ?,*z . ... : „x,�,!�e,
:�z..4,34;, . ,?'r'�e * �< .r� -rss. h;3ca ��„,;,%'zs"z'�f` ,.s.+'�` ;`> i3�i'�'�"Y� ss� ' , s� t �" ' �i , ,". r °te , , `•�.r"" ?h '`'ar
s' .�'a}v... x �
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment .
development of the property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 2 . 676
Equivalent Residential Units ( ERU ) , or 669 . 000 gallons/day . This is based upon a level of service
of 250 gallons/ERU/day . County wastewater service is available to the site from the West Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of over 1 .000,000 gallons/day
and can accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the subject request .
Although plant capacity is sufficient, county utilities staff has indicated that the long- term capacity
of the collection system ( i . e . , pumping capacity ) could be impacted by the proposed amendment .
Staff will need to closely monitor and plan for growth in this area.
Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick- up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill . The
county ' s adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/vear. With
the county ' s average of approximately 2 . 3 persons/unit, a residential development of 2 , 676 units
would be anticipated to house approximately 6 , 155 people ( 2 . 3 X 2 . 676 ) . For the subject request
to meet the county ' s adopted level of service standard of 1 . 97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill
must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 12, 125 ( 6 , 155 X 1 . 97 ) cubic yards/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the
availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards . The active segment of the landfill has a three year
capacity , and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010 . Based on the analysis , staff
determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed land use designation .
Stormwater Management
During the development approval process , all developments are reviewed for compliance with
county stormwater regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and
minimum finished floor elevations . In addition, development proposals must meet the discharge
requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance . Any development on the subject
property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of the pre -development rate . For
these reasons , drainage Level of Service will not be lowered by the proposed amendment .
Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most
intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed land use
designation indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained . The following table
illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and
the existing surplus park acreage .
PARK INFORMATION
LOS ( Acres per 1 ,000 Population ) Project Demand ( Acres ) Surplus Park Acreage
4 . 0 24 . 6192 1 , 164
`s.
€ ;r
JUNE 59 2001 .
H r
< a' �' t a Y m^ 4 XX '„b �x� s`v i;Y ✓`r .,r' + (ia i }y h -S, #.: t r <
+ . x
� k
r t o zr:`>-s"' 3r• ',`n M1��.,.,. ; �. , 'r: ' ax Asa-, -: § r 2 i, � 3 � a .r . + a
,4 . s'r`' �' ' x
'h , ,.,+°`3. 3r 4[ t" +'; �+' s . ^s". y w. a *t r , r.,s'z :. c .M ' . '9 �. . >s
':& . >r .S•: ^
'W
Concurrency Summary
Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency- mandated facilities ,
including stormwater management, roads, solid waste , water, wastewater, and parks have adequate
capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use
designation .
While all services and facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the
subject property under the proposed land use designation and zoning, this positive concurrency test
is not an indication that the subject properties are currently appropriate for residential development
at an urban density .
Passingthe concurrency test justifies the proposed land use amendment only if the proposed land
use designation is consistent with all other comprehensive plan policies and compatible with
surrounding areas . In Indian River County , available capacity for services does not dictate
development patterns ; rather, the comprehensive plan dictates the location of services .
Consistencv with Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the
Comprehensive Plan . As per section 800 . 07( 1 ) of the County Code , the "Comprehensive Plan may
only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section
163 . 3177(2 ) , F.S . " Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land
uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural , residential, recreational ,
conservation , and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities .
The goals , objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan . Policies
are statements in the plan that identify
the actions which ch the count will take
to order t
Y o direct the
community ' s development. As courses of action committed to by the county , policies provide the
basis for all county land development decisions-- including plan amendment decisions . While all
comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing
plan amendment requests . Of particular applicability for this request are the following objectives
and policies :
Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 1
The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with
the county ' s Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 . This policy requires that
at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria
I
are :
• the proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan :
• the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan :
• the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites ,
and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity
depicted on the Future Land Use Map ; or
0 the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances
affecting the subject property .
In this instance , both the O ' Haire Proposal and staff s alternative to that proposal meet Future Land
Use Element Policy 14 . 3 's second criterion , the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the
approved plan . The oversight is related to the agricultural designation of land fronting thoroughfare
JUNE 5 2001
oii £.? Ftp w
Zt
t 77
,x ; L J' fiyt ~P SFS *fi xm sf a .+Sar A'',e rF ` rti
a r
d
: €5 r u}' Ye ;a Y rr
1. 117
13 Y I
., ..ria: " ,.a;. ` ... � . ..; .w n.� xr '� � , .), , ..,: W- ,,- ' .w t, ^",� .2` •c =~a . l
2;, •� ' '`" ro, `�
Y m'{rs,�i^ 4b`1 .< xi y 'Sa3< �
` b a
plan mads with utility lines in the road right -of- way . Although used for agricultural purposes when
the pian was adopted, that land is appropriate for urban use and should have been given an urban
land use designation . When the plan was adopted , the county knew that utility lines were planned
for 58 `" . 74`" , and 8 ? "d Avenues . The failure to include the subject properties within the USA .
constitutes an oversight . For that reason , both the O ' Haire Proposal and staff s alternative meets
Future Land Use Element Policy 14 . 3 ' s second criterion and are consistent with Future Land Use
Element Policy 14 . 3 .
Summary of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
While the referenced policy is particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan
policies and objectives also have relevance . For that reason , staff evaluated both the O ' Haire
Proposal and the Staff Alternative Proposal for consistency with all applicable plan policies and
objectives . Based upon that analysis , staff determined that both proposals are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan .
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
While development under either the O ' Haire proposal or the staff proposal could be compatible with
surrounding areas , development under the staff proposal is more likely to be compatible . The staff
proposal is more likely to be compatible because it contains several provisions (" implemented by the
associated text amendment) that somewhat lessen agricultural/urban incompatibilities . Those
provisions include the following :
• Residential projects on T designated land must provide a 300 foot wide ( or up to ?5 % of
project area width, whichever is less ) , Type A buffer where the project abuts , or is across
right-of- way from, an agricultural land use designation . The Type A buffer is the countv ' s
densest vegetative buffer. This setback and buffer will somewhat rrutigate agncultural
impacts such as noise, odor, and spray drift .
• Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants will be prohibited on T designated land .
• Buyers of platted lots in residential projects on T designated land must be notified of the
Florida Right to Farm Act, and that active agricultural operations occur nearby .
In contrast. the O ' Haire proposal does not contain any specific provisions to address potential
incompatibilities . Therefore , incompatibilities could increase under the O ' Haire Proposal because
the O ' Haire proposal results in residential property abutting agricultural property . Presently , road
and canal right-of- way provide several hundred feet of separation between residential and
agricultural .
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
As indicated in the Existing Land Use Pattern section of this report , a significant portion of the land
of the subject properties has been altered for residential or agricultural development. Since most of
the land has been disturbed, few natural areas remain within the bounds of the subject property .
Therefore , the proposed change will not have a significant effect on environments
] 4 ual �
v
rt .
With respect to the natural area within the subject property ' s limits , it should be noted that any
residential development will need to comply with the county ' s land development regulations ,
including its environmental provisions . Various environmental permits , including land clearing and
tree removal permits , must be obtained prior to development. In addition , the county ' s native upland
plant community set-aside requirement will apply to properties at least five acres in size .
The proposed amendment will not result in an increase in potential adverse environmental impacts
on the subject property .
JUNE 59 2001
- 93 -
s `ss e #94 r 77� c -
41
u
ell
lK
n e Fk �y; -•k J y , •, F a€ ,.y a p;'r x . ..a.' bk r s
r
ay< , ` . ol, r
xap � a
Site Development Options
Recent legislation in the State of Florida ( the Bert Harris Property Rights Act) gives land owners
certain rights associated with their property ' s land use designation . With the passage of the Bert
Harris Property Rights Act, land owners may petition for compensation when the development
potential of their property is reduced . In other words , if either the O ' Haire or the staff proposal is
adopted, it cannot be "un-done" in the future without compensating the property owner.
In addition to several agricultural , recreational , and institutional site development options , owners
of agriculturally designated land have the following two residential site development options :
1 . They can create a subdivision of five - acre lots .
2 . They can create a subdivision of one-acre or smaller lots ( at a I unit/5 acres density )
clustered together on a portion of the site . The remainder of the site can be used for
agriculture , open space, or recreational amenities .
ALTERNATIVES
Regarding this issue , the Board of County Commissioners has the following three alternatives . It
is important to note that although Alternatives I and 2 both redesignate land to the T desienation .
the meaning of the T designation is different for each of those alternatives . Ultimately , the T
designation will be defined by the Board of County Commissioners when it considers the associated
text amendment.
Alternative 1 : The O ' Haire Proposal. This alternative redesignates Subject Properties1 . 2 , and
3 , a total ± 164 . 1 acres , from AG- 1 to T. For this alternative , the T designation is as described in Mr.
O ' Haire ' sro osal .
P P
Alternative 2 : Staff Proposal. This alternative redesignates ±892 acres from AG- 1 to T. For this
alternative , the T designation is as described in staff s proposal .
Alternative 3 : Do Nothing. This alternative is to not amend the Future Land Use Map at this time .
Alternative 3 recognizes that expanding the USA at this time is premature and that owners of land
outside the USA currently have development options and do not need additional relief. This
alternative allows the county to continue to monitor the situation and study other proposed solutions .
Although often narrowly described as a question of what Mr. Clontz can do, this issue has many "Bi2
Picture " and "Long Term" implications . Alternative 3 recognizes the advantages of a cautious
approach toward USA expansion . This can allow a more permanent solution . In contrast.
Alternative 1 is a temporary solution since many additional USA expansion requests will follow, and
the Board will have no basis to deny those requests . Although Alternative 2 can be a permanent
solution , it will not end incompatibilities or pressure to expand the USA .
As has been noted in previous staff reports , the Board now has an opportunity to significantly
influence the development pattern in this part of the county . The Board can use that influence to
implement a pattern that promotes compatibility , efficient service delivery , and agricultural
preservation ; or the Board can give up that influence and risk creating a sprawl type development
pattern . Due to state law, a decision now would be extremely expensive to change in the future .
L
JUNE 512001G
tG 16
- 94 -
7 7
i= ,
x F F P r r
el
w 4 Gn l F xx Syr ✓'' K a
'i. v" j-
.. {� _ . , ] -�,- s >Ywrv. . i.., n. c¢ �!"` n� . ...4 .. , Lt , .� . _ < � .. _ .. . � a .. .x
- . ._ . . . _ .- . . . . .. .Em . .. . ., . ._ . . . , _ e
kE t y ' a
ti c E 3'7 FS-y ? c Y; y .! Cta777777
77
tt
t+
y i Yh ..c :LE
. . .. 1 aa.. A . .. rv ,. ..a { S h , :n i' ty '.' y.E . ,4v...al ..1 J 5 . 1. ° ` L ✓ - S
F
iY 4. . rv:: w. b: . . ♦ ..!! . s ::d i, v. iYx b.a 4 = T` 4
a .^x.�#J n, ,: ':. �'Ar..a�.;f
�,. ' .-".. . .. n . . ;tz, . .. � .�z ,;Ji
Choosing Alternative 3 would allow the Board to study other development patterns , such as Rural
Villages . Potentially , a pattern of rural villages would protect private property rights . provide relief
for Mr. Clontz and other similarly situated property owners , preserve agriculture and open space ,
allow ranchettes , and reduce incompatibilities . Rural Villages can also reduce
public services , ce the cost of providing
P ces , and maintain the rural character and identity of a community . p ding
On July 11 , 2000, the Board of County Commissioners , by a 5 to 0 vote , essentially chose
Alternative 3 for Subject Property 1 .
CONCLUSION
Alternative 1 uses arbitrary criteria to provide relief for the owners of three tracts . This alternative
does not address compatibility issues and is likely to create a domino effect of land use amendment
applications from adjacent land owners .
similar parcels similarly . For that reason. no domi
Alternative 2 uses reasonable criteria and treats no
effect is anticipated to be associated with this alternative . Several provisions of this alternative are
in place to trutigate potential incompatibilities . Of the two alternatives that change the
comprehensive plan , staff supports Alternative 2 .
Alternative 3 recognizes that expanding the USA at this time is premature and that additional
consideration of this issue can lead to a better, more permanent solution . Staff supports Alternative
3 .
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis conducted, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners choose Alternative 3 and not amend the Comprehensive Plan
at this time but continue to study the issue of urban service area expansion . If, however, the Board
of County Commissioners determines that the Comprehensive Plan should be amended, then staff
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
chose
to the T, Transitional Residential , land use designation . Alternative _ to redesignate ±892 acres
ATTACHMENTS
L Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Amendment Application
2 . Detailed Concurrency Analysis
3 . Approved Minutes of the April 5 , 2001 , Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
4 . Unapproved Minutes of the May 17 , 2001 , Professional Services Advisory Committee Meeting
5 . Transmittal Resolution
JUNE 59 2001 6 a
- 95 -
V
f
Ilk' If
If, If
1 1117 Ilk,
Ilk
If
i
. :.7
4 °hY•`r L
S 5 !
NY
5
kill
If If
$de
v
If
Sp'
ATTACIIMENT - COUNTY INITIATED LAND USE AMENDMENT
0.7)
PROPERTY OWNERS
AIlk
LOCATION
CREAGE PARCEL # 's
I . Gerald R . Clonit Southwest corner of 58 "' Av . & the Main ( ',mal 30 . 8 1 )5 - 33 - 39 - II( NNH )
- 71NN1 - ( NNN ) 2 . 0 &
' Z,
Ck
1 )8 - 33 - 39 -INNN11 )- 1 (NN )- ( NNH ) I . ( 1
2 . Betmell I)evelo m�ent , I ' l
f Soulheas ( corner of 82 "" Av . & I ° St . , SW
76 . 8 24 - 33 - 38 - O N9 ) 1 - 0120 - ( NN )( II . ( 1
3 . Indian River Exchange Packers , Inc . Soulheasl corner of 74 "' Av . & 91" SL , SW
18 . 2 30- 33 - 39 - ( NHN ) I ( N )4 ( I - 1 )( NN ) I . ( )
4 . Mirallores , Inc . Northeast corner of 74 "' Av . t . , SW '
�. & 13 "' S 38 . 3 30- 33 39 -INNH11 - ( N )SII- INNN11 . 0 �
14_
f: Acd\u\vV ' \ lu \ci trans I \ahhlication matrix . wlul
I, kilk,l
a ,
Ilk
Ilk
exRi
{
�4 .
✓:' .
e;
y�: el , kli .
k ty -
If
� 3
r� 151,a
F Stir . O `Syu Yt
If
ki If
r
N
£N r
a�
r� SM. fr JS
cY
Ilk
xp .
'� F ,,:£r. e el
zIlk-
If I
I Ilk,
ko
Ilk
All
S {
k A' \ 1`rl. SrrrL�
{
Y
"
ii y, 0 r xr q q r
4VIIII .1111
FI
nFI
za . . x :+ ... s+ i `. nx, . .e
IF IF 1 61 •`
I .4 .... p s»a .., _
ra "
. y s
: � . w•** _ ,f,;�xW v.: E �yst. .+fir v. a�„ v,.t s �S*. <v i'' F T . ., i ,,,, ` s- �' 3;?3 a'F �
Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed the Comprehensive Plan
amendment process , advising that this is the first public hearing before the Board of County
Commissioners on this amendment request . If the Board approves the transmittal of this
application to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA ) in Tallahassee for their 60 - day
review , a second and final public hearing will be scheduled to consider any comments made
by the DCA and whether to adopt an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan . If the
Board denies the transmittal of an application to the DCA , the application process will come
to an end ,
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard
regarding this matter . There being none , the Chairman closed the public hearing .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board , by a 3 - 2 vote ( Commissioner Macht and
Chairman Ginn opposed ) adopted Resolution 2001 - €
057 approving the transmittal of a proposed
amendment to the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan to the State of Florida
Department of Community Affairs for its review ( to
f
redesignate the Gerald Clontz 30 . 8 acres ; the
Beuttell Development, LLC 76 . 8 acres ; and the
Indian River Exchange Packers , Inc , and Miraflores , ,
Inc . 56 . 5 acres from AG - 1 to T , Transitional ; to .
z
JUNE 5 , 2001 � ) � . . 7 ® F
- 97 -
R -
2
! l
IF F
IF
i
3 d - 4> 3 zs 7 �`
W71 77 1
, v '{ ' -
, ' _• T ,� Y5aJ'.5+�} H} y�,l �`-•(LS^ S'rn "h�,e.9 3� 'ryk,�I kT+. Yom. . >. � �Y z€" 9 S' ei 4 k ...... . y . ra h
." . . 1 kY
% 5
include the Planning & Zoning Commission ' s
conditions regarding prohibition of Caribbean Fruit
Fly host plants and required notification of the
Florida Right to Farm Act ; and reducing the density
to 1 unit per acre .
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 057
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY , FLORIDA, APPROVING THE TRANSMITTAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT
TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR ITS REVIEW .
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan on February 13 , 1990, and
WHEREAS , the county received comprehensive plan amendment applications during its January
2001 amendment submittal window , and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on this comprehensive plan
amendment request on April 5 , 2001 , after due public notice, and
WHEREAS , the Local Planning Agency voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners not transmit the comprehensive plan amendment listed below ; and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held a Transmittal
Public Hearing on June 5 , 2001 , after advertising pursuant to F. S . 163 . 3184( 15 ) (b ) ( 1 ) , and
WHEREAS , The Board of County Commissioners announced at the transmittal public hearing
its intention to hold and advertise a final public hearing at the adoption stage of the plan amendment
process .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT:
1 . The above recitals are ratified in their entirety .
JUNE 59 2001 ,�
- 98 -
t. ; .
s
4
y-
i
{ l
fi
n. a
If
If
If 1111C 14
z s v�,'a' +s�' a. r r �_
rif 4
., s . �i. ., v -m .... ;'v^. . ..�.�,r . , .n „ �, a a ;z^.?-'c.�'N '.4x'f' �' ;F ,>;`5° , < y'er�
- e a ' s4z rtr ' ,tIf
2 " v
}-
'i
RESOLUTION NO , 2001 - 057
2 . The following proposed amendment is approved for transmittal to the State of Florida
Department of Community Affairs :
a . Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from AG - 1 ,
Agricultural - 1 ( up to 1 unit/5 acres ) , to T, Transitional Residential (up to 1 unit/acre ; or
up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects ) , for ±30 . 8 acres locate! at the
southwest corner of the Main Canal and 58 `h Avenue ; and
b . Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from AG- 1 ,
Agricultural - 1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres) , to T, Transitional Residential ( up to 1 unit/acre ; or
up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects ) , for ±76 . 8 acres located at the
northeast corner of 5" Street , SW and 82nd Avenue ; and
c . Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from AG - 1 ,
Agricultural - 1 (up to I unit/5 acres ) , to IT, Transitional Residential (up to 1 unit/acre ; or
up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects ) , for ±56. 5 acres located at the
southeast corner of 74`h Avenue and 9" Street , SW .
The forgoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Adams and seconded by
Commissioner Stanbridge and upon being put to a vote , the vote was as follows :
` Chairman Caroline D . Ginn Nay
Vice-Chairman Ruth M . Stanbridge Aye
Commissioner Fran B . Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R . Macht Nay
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted at a public hearing held
this 5" day of June 2001 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
r
BY : ��w
Caroline D . Ginn, Chat an
ATTES a&OW
Jeffrey K . Barton , rk
JUNE 59 2001 W7
- 99 -
M
-71 If
If
4 Ir
If
y 'y x
x
3 ly
r ' , % t,.C''iTiaw;Yay r 'r" � '"s; a>It �x"n ✓ .a=" " S a<' '{~k' s.� . , " ..3� x }�
fi
a/s
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - Q5 7
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
f iz �J
William G . Collins II, Deputy County Attorney
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
Robert M . Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
Indian River Co. Approved Date
Admin .
Legal �s0 py
Budget 530
Dept. `
Risk M c
f: \cd\u\v\j\lu\ci trans 1 \transmittal resolution . wpd
JUNE 512001 f,
CF
- 100 -
7,77ti
Y Y
r r
77
JY
.. 3 . . : ., If
C.. . , ;3x.,., wev t*`e° >w F . >,. . . ?r, }, 4.xtz .,Y. £ ✓l's . :1 �" ` . ,.. �yryw
. t„ .. .
. . 2: ' ..; • , � 4. k i* 'A j. $nYy" L*`e i. ".'k"""' ' x . ' h: .t` �sy'S.. g , 4 Ah . i ',
e a� t 5:ft` S� +'^' ✓ L` LF `rr�°l ✓1`t + xS .tk i'd arN�
If
9 . C . PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
9. C. 1. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 12, 2001 :
A . VERo BEACH DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION - REQUEST TO
REZONE ±10. 6 ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE- QUARTER
MILE EAST OF US# 1 AND ±180 FEET NORTH OF 97TH LANE FROM
RS- 1 To RM- 6 (QUASI-JUDICIAL )
Be ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT - REQUEST
FOR RIGHT- OF- WA Y ABANDONMENT FOR A NUMBER OF RIGHTS-
OF- WAY WITHIN PORTION OF THE FELLSMERE FARM
COMPANY SUBDIVISION, LOCATED SOUTH OF THE TOWN OF
FELLSMERE AND EAST OF WILLOW STREET (LEGISLATIVE)
C. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF THE WALKER PARCELS OF THE
OYSTER BAR SALT MARSH ENVIRONMENTAL LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECT. USING ENVIRONMENTAL LAND ACQUISITION BOND
FUNDS (LEGISLATIVE)
9. G 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHED ULED FOR JUNE 199 2001 :
A. THOMAS S. HAMMOND - REQUEST TO REZONE ±18. 7ACRES
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE- QUARTER MILE EAST OF 43RD
A VENUE. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 41 ST STREET FROM CG TO IL
(QUASI-JUDICIAL
JUNE 59 2001 , A
- 101 -
f 77
4 t
ff
C
a
r
S
y
Ilk
ZI
lff
N¢Af'`�^" '' S,c,', i§s, + �. E'v�`mc•' $ fhr,.y' Y,q+4" iwr " lk
�
> ,» , v
,ufik1 ^ ea.`4e
x atY h
2 ..
fil
Be LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (LDR) AMENDMENTS NEW
STANDARDS INVOL LING FIRE VEHICLE MOVEMENT THROUGH
SITES AND BUILDING ACCESS FOR SUCH VEHICLES AND OTHER
FIRE PROTECTION ITEMS (LEGISLATIVE)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 24 , 2001 :
TO : James E . Chandler; County Administrator
DIV N HEAD CONCURRENCE :
K <�
Robert M. Keating , AICP ; ommuni Development Director
. 4 6.
FROM : Stan Boling, AICP ; Planning Direct r
DATE : May 24, 2001
SUBJECT : Notice of Scheduled Public Hearings for Upcoming Board Meetings
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 5, 2001 .
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION :
Please be advised that the following public hearings have been scheduled for Board consideration ,
as follows :
June 12, 2001 Meeting
1 . Vero Beach Development Association ' s request to rezone ± 10. 6 acres located approximately
one quarter mile east of US 1 and ± 180 feet north of 97' Lane from RS - 1 , Single - Family
Residential District (up to 1 unit/acre), to RM-6 , Multiple -Family Residential District ( up
to 6 units/acre) . (Quasi-Judicial)
2 . St. John ' s River Water Management District ' s request for a right-of-way abandonment for
a number of rights-of-way within a portion of the Fellsmere Farm Company Subdivision,
located south of the Town of Fellsmere and east of Willow Street. (Legislative)
3 . Approval of purchase of the Walker parcels of the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh environmental land
acquisition project, using environmental land acquisition bond funds . (Legislative)
JUNE 59 2001PG 1 _
- 102 -
p
k Ilk,1: 11 if .. rF . ...w .. .o 3 V , s 4n . A y e . . . . . . . e.
t
'Ye
'��,j�n� n '=
Y
June 19, 2001 Meetine
I . Thomas S . Hammond ' s request to rezone 18 . 7 acres located approximately one quarter mile
east of 43 `d Avenue, on the south side of 4151 Street from CG, General Commercial District,
to IL , Light Industrial District. (Quasi-Judicial)
2 . Land Development Regulation (LDR ) Amendments :
new standards involving fire vehicle movement through sites and building access for such
vehicles, and other fire protection items . (Legislative)
RECOMMENDATION :
The above referenced public hearing dates are provided for the Board ' s information . No action is
needed .
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN .
JUNE 59 2001 � � r+ 7 G
- 103 -
d ?�
v
n1 01
Av
10 . PROPOSED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY
MEETING REGARDING CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH
THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of June 4 , 2001 :
TO : Board of County Commissioners
i
FROI% I : James E . Chandler, County Administrator
y �
DATE : June 4 , 2001 '
SUBJECT : Proposed Collective Bargaining Strategy Meeting
As the Board is aware, we are at impasse in contract negotiations with the IAFF . The
Special Master Hearing is set for June 29 , 2001 . However, negotiations are continuing in an
effort to reduce the number of impasse issues . As a result, I would request consideration of a
strategy meeting at the conclusion of tomorrow ' s Board meeting.
County Administrator Jim Chandler requested a short meeting at the conclusion of the
Board ' s meeting and noted that a Special Master is scheduled for June 29 `h
CONSENSUS was reached to hold a brief meeting immediately following the
conclusion of today ' s Board meetings .
JUNE 512001 V
J({")
iG 7j
- 104 -
t _ .
r4
t ' 1
jll
a � �
. _ .
f G .
3
-. , . .. , L fl
Ik
, h 1 ,.roa
_ ' ,
I if
MCA * SHOOTING RANGE - GRAND OPENING - FISH &
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 25 , 2001 :
Date : Mast, 25 , 2001
To : The Honorable Board of Countv Commissioners
Thru : mes E . Chandler, County Administrator
From : Thomas W. Frame, General Services DirectorC(./
Subject : Grand Opening for Shooting Range
The public shooting range has been open since April 18 , 2001 . In determining when to hold a
Grand Opening ceremony, we have been requested by the representatives of the Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission to coordinate the dates so that the appropriate state officials
may participate .
Holden Kriss, Range Master, has informed me that in a conversation with a Commission
representative, the earliest date for an anticipated grand opening would be the last week of July
or the first week of August .
If any member of the Board of County Commissioners has any preferential date , please advise
this office so that we may coordinate your needs appropriately .
i
I
General Services Director Tom Frame announced that the Grand Opening of the
Shooting Range will be held on Saturday , August 11 , 2001 . That date has been confirmed
with the Educational Director for the Division of Wildlife
JUNE 59 2001Glid Fib LV78
1i
- 105 -
+ yz 4x
1 h 1J qq1
ITT
s z . r e s✓� ` 'T' ,}r
' .� tt '2 f3 •"Y. x.m'§ h,.b. r 5
4 _
MCI BID #3058 - NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY RENOVATIONS
- CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 17 , 2001 :
Date : May 17 , 2001
To : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Throuah . James E . Chandler, County Administrator
X1
Thomas W . Frame, General Services Director // ' " " J ` t'�
From . Fran Powell , Purchasing Manager /ICLx
Subject : Approval of Bid Award
Reference : Bid Award : IRC # 3058 North County Library Renovations
General Services Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
This is the bid for the renovation of the Indian River County North Library project , which was
approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 13 , 2001 . It consists of the following
elements in general . construction of the addition and remodeling of the existing Library Site
Development .
Bid Opening Date . May 9, 2001 at 2 : 00 P . M .
Advertising Dates : March 29, 2001 and April 4 , 2001
DemandStar Broadcast to : Two Hundred Sixty One (26 1 ) Vendors
Plans Requested By : Eleven ( 11 ) Vendors
Replies : Six (6 ) Vendors
BID TABULATION
VENDOR BID TOTAL
Chilberg Construction Company, Inc . $ 112443763 . 00
Vero Beach, FL
Speegle Construction $ 1 , 253 , 200 . 00
Cocoa, FL
Summit Construction $ 133701985 . 00
Vero Beach, FL
Bill Bryant & Assoc . $ 113981300 . 00
Vero Beach, FL
R. D . Michaels Inc $ 1 , 442 , 350 . 00
Maitland, FL
Paul Jacquin & Sons $ 11458 , 459 00
Ft Pierce, FL
JUNE 59 2001 tl rPC
- 106 -
t
F µ .$
111. 1
Irvl
y ksf 2 „i t.
e
�1
•
i.
RECOINVVENDED BID AWARD AMOUNT $ 152441763 . 00
ESTIMATED BUDGET $ 1 , 518 , 000 . 00
SOURCE OF FUNDS Library — Other Buildings
315 - 112 - 571 -066 . 29
RECOMMENDATION
Staff along with Edlund & Dritenbas Architects, P . A. , recommends that the bid be awarded to
Chilbern Construction Company, Inc as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder
meeting specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board
unanimously awarded Bid # 3058 to Chilberg
Construction Company, Inc , in the amount of
$ 1 , 244 , 763 , as recommended by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
JUNE 59 2001 I I is0 F
- 107 -
7777777
k
1-4
MCI SHERIFF DEPARTMENT EVIDENCE STORAGE
ADDITION - DOW , HOWELL , GILMORE ASSOCIATES ,
INC . - ARCHITECTS FOR DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 29 , 2001 :
Date : May 29, 2001
To : The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru : James E . Chandler, County Administrator )
From : Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director �GU .
Subject: Agreement with Dowe Howell * GilmoreeAssociates, Inc., Architects for
Design and Constructions Services for an Addition to the Indian River
County Sheriff' s Department for Evidence Storage
EXHIBIT : Proposed Negotiated Architectural Agreement
BACKGROUND :
Pursuant to the requirements of the Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act, the Board of County
Commissioners on June 13 , 2000, approved the selection of Dow, Howell , Gilmore, Associates , Inc . ,
Architects as the selected design professional for the Sheriff' s evidence storage expansion . As such, staff
was authorized to negotiate with Dow Howell Gilmore for professional services related to the design and
construction of the Sheriffs Evidence Storage expansion .
Subsequently, a meeting for negotiations was held with representatives of Dow, Howell , Gilmore . A
period of time progressed due to expanded desires by the Sheriff' s Department for additional remodeling
associated with the evidence storage . Since there was a limited amount of funding provided for this
particular work, it was decided to allow the newly elected Sheriff to give direction . It was finally decided
to continue with the basic expansion as originally proposed.
After negotiations in mid-December, an agreement was reached which provides basically for a fee of
12 .4% of construction costs based on a construction cost estimate of $ 185 . 000 or $22 ,950 in architectural
fees plus a not to exceed $9,250 for site plan and water management permit modification approvals for a
total of $32 ,200 ( 17 .4%) .
Funding in the amount of $250,000 from the one-cent sales tax revenue has been previously approved by
the Board .
RECOMENDATION :
Staff submits that the proposed architectural agreement with Dow, Howell , Gilmore, Associates, Inc . ,
Architects is fair and reasonable and recommends Board approval subject to the County Attorney ' s final
review and approval .
JUNE 5 , 2001 I t1;
- 108 -
71
J
' 4
n ,� >n r`' r a,?. t ,; �" 'j. 'E ✓k arks
7 777
77 77 77 7
If
If
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht , the Board
unanimously approved the architectural agreement
with Dow, Howell , Gilmore Associates , Inc . , subject
to the County Attorney ' s final review and approval ,
as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11 . G . 1 . FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT - ROSELAND ROAD
SIDEWALK AND JUNGLE TRAIL/PELICAN ISLAND
WILDLIFE REFUGE - PROJECTS 9916 AND 9724
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 25 , 2001 :
TO : James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH : James W. Davis , P . E . , Public Works Directot'
AND
Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , P . E . , County Engine
FROM : Robert S . Skok, Civil Engineer
SUBJECT : FDOT Supplemental Agreement for Roseland Road Sidewalk - IRC Project
No . 9916 AND Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Wildlife Refuge - IRC Project No .
9724
DATE : May 25 , 2001
JUNE 59 2001 vii
- 109 -
r F. :.2
bx
�;. �4
tr:re.i.x1'�. . :i.�`.>�,'�::-s �zx�,+:.t+t,..w, a. . ..':'d"k.s.r.eel4�,.:.,,".� c&e.�rR.n�5P`a.t+rngP.,,..,.{,.x3s.:__"cd•3„e�
3 A,.r 3at-✓?F ex',„'.?:'E,:._,a<a+„.e:.Ni. ^kg e e.r".S...Y.��
,
�4
S
ONO r ' vg a .
' � .�F e �Y N
_ _ : r ::
e v
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Staff is following guidelines from the Florida Department of Transportatigram
on Local Agency Pro
for funding of Enhancement Projects . Staff has obtained a chance for $ 110, 000. 00 of increased
funding for the Roseland Road Sidewalk Project, and $ 105 , 000 of increased funding for the Jungle
Trail/Pelican Island Project from a previous Enhancement Project (Gifford Sidewalk) which was
determined to be not feasible. The elimination of the Gifford Sidewalk Project was approved by the
Metropolitan Planning Organization on March 15 , 2001 .
Our current approved funding for the Roseland Road Sidewalk Project is $252,000. If approved, the
new total will be $362 ,000. For the Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Project our current approved funding
is $ 700, 000. If approved, the new total will be $ 805 ,000 .
Ai TFRNATEUS AND AAT ycrc
*T
In October 1999 the Florida Department of Transportation and Indian River County entered into an
agreement for $229,000. 00 funding to be provided by the Florida Department of Transportation to
Indian River County for reimbursement after the County constructs the Roseland Road sidewalk .
In January 2001 , the Florida Department of Transportation and Indian River County executed a
~ ; Supplemental Agreement for an additional $23 , 000 . 00 in funding which brought the total to
$252,000. 00. In February 2001 , staff discovered a proposed sidewalk project along U. S . Highway
# 1 from 37” Street o 45 ” Street was not feasible by the Florida Department of Transportation
Standards. The Florida Department of Transportation terminated the $215,000. 00 agreement for the
Gifford Sidewalk. Florida Department of Transportation has reallocated funds as follows :
1 . A proposed increase of $ 110, 000 . 00 to the Roseland Sidewalk Project
2 . A proposed increase of $ 105 , 000. 00 to the Jungle Trail Project
The attached letters dated May 15 , 2001 from Gary Keife explains the Florida Department of
Transportation can supply an additional $ 110, 000. 00 for Roseland Road Sidewalk Project and
$ 105 ,000 for the Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Project. In order to confirm this additional funding the
County must submit the supplemental agreement to the Florida Department of Transportation .
RFCOMMFNI) e TIONS
Staff recommends the Board authorize the Chairman sign the supplemental agreements .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board
unanimously approved the Supplemental Agreements
for the Roseland Road Sidewalk Project and for the
Jungle Trail/Pelican Island Project and authorized
the Chairman to execute same , as recommended by
staff.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
JUNE 59 2001 nil 1 2
- 110 -
,
x
u � .E P
Av''!%s
r t �.'.
vfi' '.b, ?a `s
t` . . .:a, .. . . ✓ :. �� .. A . _. . , �. c-. . ,. . . . .`"r,... �-',� vn. . , . xl,.. .. 1 2 , ,, �,q c x .. °.„,e
� ..ry : : rr �- . A ,z '. .. a� s r kw '✓A � t' x a .,.
i` }. �
t . .:4.. ,C : :'d rm"n. _ A . ¢ ,x .. ....e. ry ,. 9' fi -T: ,* ..: fi ♦-. , P
, 9 f ....:Y ,
v ; ..>.... .r ,?• : »a,.. . anC a",.>c� v "# , ' ;;} 4 3P...,,. .. $ r v �. ; i F �.. ...�,v, i ..
.� .n s, ia #<;
f�
�"t fit:. . ;, r, " n rf �-'�" ' • , i � '�r � 'Y ,. Vp. '£." � a b,. �.s: # :
3r ew y, s „ xY,n, : ,+ F ,.` .t„• ''' �t t `' t ,:,-r "a�x . r t`3,,,... T,' `;,. %r . .;:; ,:> S, n,. . < r,
, r ,. f . ,.. u*. ., - ', , ., y , . .: . „r: . . a .. , .,:_ �s :�'.. �x , . , . . t .'s-+. . - _ . ..
, . _. .. 2 ::} .�:<•. y, 1t r... 6 ;,,, .r«5 t4f..: ,i� h v � Y [4r
� it;; q.� t 1' s 3� � 'v.. :>< ✓ ti.
.hia�:«L..J...,a,�^�^r
t
ME` t..,., t . g.� ,, . $., �.. ,.[ ,,. ...�. �" ✓ ,� „... +. „ ...,.... .., .s "'� k. :: I , . : �_„,
�' ." .::, , ,,. . "-. c „ a:: s .r � ..x + {, e n *x jyr�. if'•.: a Y + * 1 �
F .. ,. .. �Se .[..r .. �3 L �+, ., v1a r ,t .� rr•. . 3�m x. :. +. . ,. . , .;_:. .,,.. ;-e • ,. .: .,-.... ,.......
.. ,' ;� Y'.r:.- hm ,. ,>2. sts mom^..- `.:. y ..s*i,F- "iixL -h . 7 s „
. . .. ,. . .s ,. - , r< .x''.,i :e. ,/ c �nY , . .•.. . . W`d�. n.., �. � ,. .,. .... .. f ,. „ Ti':
.;" , .,. 3 ,. :r:.., # zy x F ,Y *i^.-ta,9 f �',a ;. ? r £ x *. v
�:: r �. .. n .. r ..x^n,.�, .«�nw �' �,:n . ,. v :.•^. ..• . '. �-r":".:^ , , p ",-.e ask, ,.,:_.. . , �: s4
a -, t' N . .. .. ,w „ , . ,,. �h a.t.,.. .x >ti r F „ `.: : is . f`.. ^,* tzr �*Yr..x
,�. . .t. , , ...�.x .p ,.n, s`. *x �h_,,. �! . rk`4`m rp u. . as.%. .... 1 K v . , ,..,, c . x S r �:.,. <
, ^ • . : ..: . .,>,"^ .s € y f'" .0", 'i .. 2` .n t,, .a�5..� Z .-+.+ t�: -'Ir
t y 'k'. :u.sP ?a^ =.,^ 3����i. �, i. Ian* + � �3.3a�nw .N`d= :,P`it+ {` ,, , a�i�.... r✓ ': r ,i e .
• -. ,.. , ..'S S � t ['., ; .«S rn,�.� `�+ y,�. .;U.� Si � . ;, t� a 3 j '"�`: a i'
� x a � a � -. M ., «d . . k,...5 yE•7 r a , f . .+. r .i i i a ,y; � � ,.'G•' r x
� e,sij'y:.� r a .+y�' r«, c I - . xt �x:." + }'
._£ « s reh ^£^e ' , i - .k*, , . '".x• . .. . ,. w � , .4 . 2- ,a.... . � .. . _ � S , � .
.4-: Re .. . S ver- .+.. ,r . ��- _ _ . ttl 'rkyz ,y � f` r
r
l l * G . 2 . BID #3061 - SEBASTIAN CANOE LAUNCH - SUMMIT
CONSTRUCTION - PROJECT 9819
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30 , 2001 :
TO : James Chandler, County Administrator ,
. ,
THROUGH : James V4' . Davis , P . E . , Public Works Director
AND '
Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , P . E . , County Engine
FROM : Robert S . Skok, Civil Engineer 7 1
SUBJECT : Sebastian Canoe Launch, Award of Bid No . 061 - IRC Project No . 9819
DATE : Mav 30, 2001 ,
DESCRIPEDN AND CONDITIONS
In 1997 the City of Sebastian applied for a Florida Recreation Development Assistant Program
(FRDAP) Grant through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP ) . Former
Sebastian City Engineer, Martha Campbell, prepared a total construction cost estimate of
$ 105 , 000 . 00. The proposed site was along Stone Crop Street (within the City of Sebastian) . In early 1 "
1998 the County was preparing to purchase a tract of land from Henry Fischer, North of County
Road 512 . The County took over responsibility for the project. In July 1998 , the County executed
the agreement with FDEP to reimburse the County $ 105 , 000 . 00 (non-matching) for construction
costs . Since that time, the County Engineering Division has prepared construction plans , contractell
documents and specifications for the Sebastian Canoe Launch .
Bid Opening Date : May 9 , 2001
Advertisement Dates : April 18 and 25 , 2001 i
Bids Received : One ( 1 )
Summit Construction Management, Inc . submitted the only bid in the amount of $ 194, 128 . 55 . Staff
is of the opinion that the bid is reasonable.
ALTERNAIR)'E 'S AND ANALYSIS
Alternative No . t - Award the bid in the amount of $ 194 , 128 . 55 to Summit Construction
Management, Inc . The only County funds available in the amount of $ 89, 128 . 55 would be from
Florida Boating Improvement Fund 133 -210- 572 - 068 . 05 .
Altemative No The Board could decide to reject the bid and direct staff to re-bid the project to
possibly receive multiple competitive bids .
JUNE 59 2001
OA i U i b °r
- 111 -
f 4
L
, 'w,' 5,,777
( .. z a '.,' 2 •:; .: rT:'.. ;� > m � f a x^ Nom,, z,� sxi 1 ;,
x Tx %y Fv£
.ia; +?, t ».cf.. �, & .. r} n��:N . a , s,:5' :r�.. '+'zvznP .,?� Y :.,. , in 'r ;.,... . t 7 i � t . . :: . f . .:-
w � <,, ,rt r ii , ae. , ,v. . t, 3 € u.l y+,- 1 x• s . + <r u. � `
3 ., �+� _, , , � r� a ..... eRx'k. �' Xf' ,gip, w =.1 o a x' �• s t - :2sx
�, } e x r
:: :, ,. ',�3b .. ... ° , ,r , �x 7l sus. . �� ... v . £7,,,. :: ! }, ,.,s. as w [ },-, . ' : '�
> ”, :i F . •w� : xr.'xf�'.,� {< �;K d �# 4
% .s. `xi , rl" w xt`«F:" r ;>. . ' Fa ? :-`. S •r P '>y r m u 3 � e ;, r " - . �: ,
";* „ v” . r:_, t, „xr h :o°i;`i " `' ,e.•w, ; �'` s
m rcC v :. M ,. . - 5 x� •`'�k� 4 �"? ,{,,.p �• .,fit,_, a.: a:. ;u '.: :`Y € �rEv ,.«x =xt [. ,s , '..{,: X
, . . :`i.' sr F R`t ._,i � $'n� a .�Yv £'
„ax„ n -., x� a, s'�w��sa£' ass '.w'�,.S.�fi. .Y'x+�.1t.=a3�3�,�'s z�sr2',^w°..�� s� z.. .�� . �k; ^.� � � ,x;..< .uS., . _�s« a ,,. , .. : ,
_ 'xv ..< ,,.c .r _ _, _ . . . _. s _ . ,. . ..., rx.; e , F,. .wS . ,._ .,te •. ms's. . ., _ - fi, sa . ;..y`� ,._ u.. ,a,-,:�':e�
.ws m;+:«a;� f_ r e . ,�.,A"C , . .< _ .
rr S r .n
n,k:.
S 3. S<v . • ,.. � v 1%M.cY1, s? � 3F.ti.J r , ... .y'e e :1 . .:a"i.. k � L F ( 4H�p
n4 -s N. t.' `a. f Aa. :
.>. _ .. k �:. Fb, d a .., 'w"� �. . !" . ._ - t` .w.,::,. . .8 .s a; :.: f . . - :'F " .b Sri
ka'1•..'e- r ., <::- +i
+ ,. . ,.. rv . .? . .,4v`. • /.,r-C. "w :,u. tri . . + :a- n . . _.e �' -.-i . +� r F .ti, . + . , ,. , :..
h . . .. .. } { ,.5i pr.
�' . .. . ... -
. .. .. � ,.- . . . . a, - t s ;:�&S�d, , 3r+�. .,,.. . � , .. �, <.., , ,,..,, � n , . . >es
r s.s - . <ei ts• r � ;.. v h � �x r, tu.. x X r.,,, .,., s ...,
. .`� .. „r .
.. �. _. ,. . ». ' 3k' . . , . e :> ,. .x . . r. .t a , ,„„-: f .- . ,f < . .,. , , ' . , ,..;,
� .,", { v3% t „Ss } -. .,. x a .„.,^n . , x '• w-- v t 4 at' iw tr
➢� .ti.: ^'Y ..
r >~ u ,.:s n %�>✓ w , . ���, k,N,'�r �iY }+ SG.L4`3 a. .., G< �� , , .. ,��*, l t �. ::':. t <.: ( .:.:” f
n^ an r .e 3. i., � (y.r e 4 ^ 5
r C ``T �Sn G :&�..� " 1 :'s4,.,:.. } rt_.,ri) +1 u„ r., v + r � t �' r f .� :.
C 5: 7 rx f• : d x
F. a ,.
35 a�F p,.� t Y �, 3 } 5 'ir: £ 2r I i „( -• k
, . -. : . t� f_ x . Pts v ^e'n.•v � ; .. F "r - '' "b s .. e�, ° ,4+,x t .t5••� ?S . T• .i.,,w
t a�'z ,, F x �xk3iy' `. p'”' ik 'L' < r i z 4
RFCOMMFNDAT1nN
Staff recommends the bid be awarded to Summit Construction Management, Inc . as the lowest and
only qualified bidder as set forth in the specifications .
Summit Construction Management, Inc . has done work for Indian River County in recent years and
had a good reference from County personnel whom worked with them .
In addition staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approval of the attached Agreement
when requirements are met and approved as to form by the County Attorney.
Fi TNDIN(;
The FDEP has agreed with the County to provide S105 ,000. 00 of funding for the construction oft s
project. The County share for this project is $ 89, 128 . 55 . Funding is from account No . 133 -210-572 -
068 . 05 . Florida Boating Improvement Program (available $ 96 , 479 . 00) . $27, 717 . 00 has been set
aside for this project, we will need an additional allocation of $ 61 ,411 . 55 .
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge , the
Board unanimously awarded Bid # 3061 to Summit
Construction and approved an allocation of
$ 61 , 411 . 55 from the Florida Boating Improvement
Program , as requested by staff.
BID DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
JUNE 5 2001
- 112 -
uz€ s
h z f, 1 ii'c= �fY ,ikt'fT
P
J+ � Y .r , k6 . ' '� •, 3��,'�"�i'} rtL.. 4e �_t+h 4 . ',. �' �b �� c ! '” : '� � . , r
tM1 �;:.: t '.r 4 � + a" ,} '' '-r' ::.v 7.' \ F
+ek rJ .,.li"h .w ,a� .. �. , .vsi w , A . . . . i ,A5 l' '-:F ... A ,:: F 9 «✓ 3 . i. $ ,. :"
� X .- > k. ^T" 4 y 'w, P 'u y�xk� R T S: . 't
. i^ -v .'nr ,�� ''� $ . '�?n�4�?>��'" .C' � �"f.�:v�i ��e S- S�nt�`'.'e' rt 3e`F".��.T$" 1 K:.n• CM1."x'ay p ,> tom^ Yt
x 4 � ..3 . :5 S "�: 'S� : li - ki !k`y�t+ i 'xt,,N,i }y �h �a f Kv.tii :N
a4 ..wU '{ �;-i `h'n � ,kZ^ , . `"kms «a , . r ` >'r"- r a .•Y. x + ,. . , ° , ' :':': , .;..u: x^n
. : xY.u. r n > s x e„ +`i r:> , ' ct r^ , 'x:
„ w .. � . . rr. . , . -,., : < . .? r, 4 .. w �^,. . . . u"F`�,�,'#,� s:c
I
,1 0
. 4 .xJ e r t , s „ ^nl , .s
,,b.Fri l G �e x ..' t *k (- ns '`.tr t -F �, w -,'tri x s :
'i:. !- y .M,ssr, A f^gt3 ,m •: k r4r . +.�"r*F. ' zro ` ^„ ej ''• ' ;w.
r
I LGA BID 43062 - MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE
SIDEWALKS PROJECT - PROJECT # 0012 - AWARD BID
ON 5TH STREET SW SIDEWALK TO BILL BRYANT &
ASSOCIATES , INC . - REJECT REMAINDER OF BID
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30 , 2001 : `
TO : James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E . , Public Works Director - - --
AND
irector-
AND
Christopher J . Kafer, Jr. , P . E . , County Enginee
FROM : Robert S . Skok, Civil Engineer KSS
SUBJECT : Miscellaneous Concrete Sidewalks Project, Recommendation of Bid No .
3062 - IRC Project No . 0012
DATE : May 30, 2001
DRSCRIPTION AND C'ON TDITIONS
The County Engineering Division has prepared construction plans , contract documents , and
specifications for the Misc . Concrete Sidewalks . This bid package includes three separate projects
as follows :
f
1 . Roseland Road Sidewalk, starting at 126 h Street and heading east to the Riverwalk Shopping
Plaza.
2 . Old Winter Beach Road Sidewalk, starting at SR A- 1 -A and heading west to Jungle Trail .
3 . 5 `h Street SW Sidewalk, between 43rd Avenue and 27`h Avenue and also on 27 'h Avenue
between 5 ' Street SW and the South Relief Canal .
ANALYSTS
k. ,
This project bid package was originally let for bid under Bid No . 3056 on March 26 , 2001 using the k
Internet based DemandStar System . Newspaper ads were published March 27 and April 3 , 3001 .
The bid opening was April 18 , in which the County received no bids . Staff contacted several
construction companies from the list of companies who purchased plans to see why no one bid .
r .
JUNE 59 2001 ni / U, ` t
- 113 -
7777 -- ;- .:� 'x t : r r: ,- x r xM• ; br n ;x *
..
.}s r ; - +. .. ., a ,. . ..r S a , a . .. =r�'?... .. , M,.,:l w.... : . af. :, t• :.,.. 3' i,. . ": . . ,r. . . F,
. :: ,.. r ryd r � g e, bra � Y r c : f 3
-
, ,,^4 My .�,n,.,x, �`�fi�" _tx tFs �..5- ;,.rr�, � sa n nex� ..ups L+: l S r 5 k : r - ♦
`5 =+.: 4x . �... us '� rr .i S
�*' .. . , :- �syx vS"�;"a , $.� , Na. . .., �`.rY. t 5,,. .:✓ /^,r� . '�-r-Y' x^r�,�,'�„w*Wyp^ k I
,3'v « . , . . r.k-''x3 -,k e. i >:. . , ... , a .e. . .. r rr .a. . i ,.- , . s, a..
. � A °$;. r,rti"' _ X „^,4m^7""',. , ..� $s
A 3p #,
.
.c" 4 .-" Y "ci axfis t! 3y �` � �' .��g� s v ink 'C - t .,fit . ➢
C .. �� aC
y u
y ,
A >. . •.:n'. .- . ,. . �. . . .,.; .. n" .� 5- v(.. W n . . :k 0. F. � _ . t I ""�yR1
�" ,. �ti. .E
Apparently, companies were not receiving plans and specifications in a timely manner from
DemandStar. The County Purchasing Division released the package for bid a second time as Bid
No. 3062 on April 20, 2001 , again using the DemandStar system . Newspaper ads were published
April 23 and April 30, 2001 . The bid opening was on May 9 , 2001 . There was just one bid from
Bill Bryant & Associates in the amount of $ 636 , 565 . 11 .
Through the Florida Department of Transportation Local Agency Project (LAP ) , the County has
agreements for reimbursement for Roseland Road Sidewalk and Old Winter Beach Road Sidewalk .
A comparison of County funds and grant reimbursement compared to the bid amount is as follows :
Sidewalk Project County Fund LAP Reimbursement Bid Amount
(Optional Sales Tax) Amount
Roseland Road $0.00 $252,000.00 $ 308 , 804 .76
Old Winter Beach Road $0. 00 $ 110, 000. 00 $ 180,449 . 10
5 " Street SW $204 ,330.00 $0. 00 $ 147 ,311 .25
Sidewalk Fund $ 100,000.00 $ 0.00 $0.00
Ls .
Proposed Additional $ 0 .00 $ 110,000.00 $ 0 .00
FDOT Funding
SUB TOTAL $304.330 . 00 $472 ,000. 00 5636. 565 . 11 s
TOTAL FUNDS + REIMBURSEMENTS $776,330.00
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY AGREEMENT $ 165 , 800 . 00
TOTAL - CONSTRUCTION $802365. 11
k
RFCOMMFNDATTON
3
Staff is of the opinjon that the Bid is not competitive. Since the Bid is over budget, Staff
recommends rejecting the bid and directing staff to re-bid the project using the pre-DemandStar
method of having the construction plans /contract documents distributed to contractors through the
Engineering Division.
k
Commissioner Adams suggested that the 5t" Street SW sidewalk bid was very good
and that we move forward with that one while we analyze the others ,
Public Works Director Jim Davis agreed that the 5 " Street SW Sidewalk work could
be broken out and the bid awarded just on thatparticular project , if the County Attorney
doesn ' t have a problem with that ,
County Administrator Jim Chandler stated that the bidder would have to agree . `
JUNE 512001 n
+ �!,. :y., !. " �.�t,�,£-�mv "S.rU2 ',ka,S.e'yF3:'SY•S Y"s,w}„. kr.,,. r. .3m,'>i�',
-.; s:ti} �aq..•. x Y t
- 114 -
7
1 14 -
1 11
.r°
. V
: ae
.-# ">r:
g, , s ♦ sN 9Y
#„ " a a`
.f" x q?�)„r r'q.§-.e �x'x ,xs a'# s °i'� "4��. ✓. .G.r=p ^C �j;�� =4'1iF. ! x ' t
_ ., .,� _. v.x. �."� '�'i'fi�st4'.�. �F. .@ ,'�t'�;`�. u!�u ia} .C; _ a"'t. �'2h`.�rv, � k" ���� f 3'k,4td.- a s -v�`"V:a *� .n�✓ [ �
.r . . . . ,� , , � � � , � r � , u �. � . . . , r 7 �. > .r , Y :' ., , , . . _ , , . a
... . _ ,
, 11
R,: :. sr s . 2. v " ',F't " ?
✓ #.: sem* , K J r:%a 5 s e s1,
E ,,o a .).«.�-� X�SH�,.\ea: t 4.7 �y: Yf �a;.e. �`X 3 ya 5 ,.°„� : .'s?� : ,.ua r � s. •. n � , '- � a
[ .t. +� y" t :� 3� ri t� ��y
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board
unanimously awarded the portion of Bid # 3062
dealing with the 5th Street SW Sidewalk to Bill
Bryant & Associates , Inc . , rejected the remainder of
the bid and directed staff to re - bid the project using
the pre - DemandStar method of having the
construction plans/contract documents distributed to
contractors through the Engineering Division , as
recommended by staff.
i
AGREEMENT FOR 5TH STREET SW SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11 . GA 58TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II — RIGHT— OF—
WAY ACQUISITION — PARCEL NO 1293 We Do GRAVES
III AND FRANCES ELLIS GRAVES — PROJECT #8823
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 24 , 2001 : w
t
5r .
3
t .
;
JUNE 59 2001 � , a
- 115 -
n,
"i`m �. " -) .d�zn g, mss, n �S d�,�._5 .a � f x v H � 4 �~a•� Y x ,: i sl y. :✓
g
a
tt s +'„Fy� ,Fos S. G s"�`;r .r,Y �„^" y} ;�� a,fFsy y'v:, t, }dt �,e �,.,,7 ,* .Y '")S�� Y. �r ::�. h `' 7 t } _ �:
u � & f. F�✓'„ a :i ..r ':.
i-
y
yry
_ _. ,'rl. 2 ,�a.�.'tti �.�f.�cr• `.� x . .,.r�. k,(L..m:' .. ��'� -. , `r:�."��"y .. .;'_' s . , a .,: k , ..n:. . . � .. .
_ ,.. + . .` C " Y` > . o- � � . .. � . , :� o- '”' . ,:- > a, r,. e
SM"
a, : 's � ' � .2-a a�',�,;;,� L' ,> rt"= . , y'" e5�:" �'' ,^>a *' `} �. i ✓ . 5 '; :i
z i 1-' A . ': >, T.c.%. IfiY ^,iN
y . ' 'a` x, ,•, r
1
sY e h
+, � • r2:.-e;,,Q. ^�3?a�` � ' , ,� t df -. f Y "tx 'y� 1� *y , $t:. -et
`u, h st t
`4 . "'dn.=n. tN` . . � A a' ve �.:M3' ,Yx2va:'"pi '. , a4K 'e'•a ` - Y Sr `"d'S A -? uM1 C - fl h h
q3L -' l i f e' l."_ S `t... 1 vw 'Q.+. S ". Ct .,? mr.,'°. o
o t5 i ti
� 'fv~ #✓.✓ �3sY'' at
TO : James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH : James W . Davis , P . E .
Public Works Director
Terry B . Thompson , P . E .
1
Manager, Capital Pro ' ect�
FROM : William M . Napier, SRPA , SRA
Right-of-Way Agent G'
SUBJECT : Right -of-Way Acquisition/County Project No , 8823
58 Avenue Improvements , Phase II
Parcel No . 129 - W. C . Graves III & Frances Ellis Graves
DATE : May 24 , 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Additional right-of-way totaling . 2614 acre along the north side of 4th Street is needed in
conjunction with the 58" Avenue , Phase II Improvement Project. The owners have
executed a contract at a price of $20 , 717 per acre for the A- 1 zoned land . This price- per-
acre is at the high end , but within the overall range of purchases the County has made of
other A- 1 parcels within the market area based upon appraisals or evaluations .
The total Contract Price is $23 , 500 . 00 , which includes $ 5 ,415 .42 for land , and $ 18 , 084 . 58
compensation for loss of vegetative buffer and claimed damages to the Remainder. The
Contract Price is substantially higher than the County ' s offer amount of $ 9 , 115 . 42 , but
considerably less than the Sellers ' previous verbal counter-offer of $40 , 000 . 00 .
Negotiations have taken place with the Graves and their attorney, Charles Garris , since
approximately June of 1995 . To lessen the potential impact to the property , the amount
of right-of-way to be acquired has been reduced from 1 . 12 acres to . 2614 acre . This will
necessitate shortening the proposed left turn lane and eliminating the proposed sidewalk ,
therefore requiring a redesign of this section of roadway improvements at additional cost
to the County . Kimley-Hom and Associates will perform this work at a fee of $ 6 , 550 . 00 .
The County will also need to construct a stabilized parking area for five ( 5 ) vehicles west
of the tennis court on the Graves ' property , to replace the existing parking in the proposed I
right-of-way. The anticipated cost of the parking area is $ 500 . 00 . There are no appraisal
or attomey fees .
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the $23 , 500 . 00 For Sale
and Purchase Contract , the $ 6 , 550 . 00 redesign proposal and $ 500 . 00 expenditure for the
stabilized parking area , and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract and proposal .
The total expenditure is $30 , 550 . 00
Funding to be from Account #315-214- 541 -066 . 12
JUNE 59 2001 � i4-
11
a > l'd¢' if' it #
e 3,. h av ��%, �7{,� �%t"''� G +in,#5:'t x� t ✓y ix �'��>s s,. �r d i i Y ; F 3 k
d r s k i .
i £. ♦ '' trt 5 i "a >T s P f fi+ '' t S �. t li � Rirti p '"i 1 S
r �'�"ti ? `"�x + t 3.,y �'F '^Y,y>y"'`,�q '�` �5'' �'�`,zi�t ;�'` ^, : t s x a , x '' pan _ tR�
r fl' t• `'< >< da ' r t
4 f's zz
f qY� 5,1s rot a e >f t sl'C _, vT ;
fl ' fll t
M
If
.� s...
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin , the Board
unanimously approved the $ 23 , 500 Contract with W .
D . Groves , III and Frances Ellis Graves ; the $ 6 , 550
redesign proposal with Kimley- Horn and Associates ,
Inc . ; the $ 500 expenditure for the stabilized parking
area ; and authorized the Chairman to execute the
contract and proposal , as recommended by staff.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11695 . SR- 60 FOUR-LANE WIDENING WEST OF I - 95 - RIGHT-
OF-WAY ACQUISITION-m JAMES B CAIN ( SEE
MINUTES OF MAY 15 , 2001 MEETING FOR PRIOR
APPROVAL )
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30 , 2001 :
4
r_
r
JUNE 59 2001 ` {
- 117 -
7, 7
r
f r
R'. ,� xc �y,$ 3�a7}az l ;� yt, r rtIf, 5` : G�v .; t' ? f x a %7:" s rr : - ONOfW
r
v ✓ � '<aa.tw.a + 1�r'ar -< w .:x .rb. :tij..3"' w"+' y.: rtg � 'zr a" (' x ', : ,y .� it '' x �
yn tr ' z ✓,t r
r, .. - s `. ., ,,� x r „ .< . ,;
% ��� � w' s Ea..\'+)','.+K•k 'K x- �< f' '+, .� tK G`$M�'"�" �1L e ,.f'. 1 ,+ S � x $
t ,k "9'+ �v 3_ xt a
N a #tc'�' :+eK .vY �"`rv#` s`'' { z:. s .?' . ^.w ` tf s••-^i5*3 +'. e .n ''i 4 a `' .i s .n;; F �.
s x '. x ay icc» n�5 `n 5 3, a
��:. �✓ f- � 2 i '!.'] ' 1 '� * to l 4 .
x .n .li < � ��m :b,� ✓ x'�'r�' tG. ,�,' `�:'1 .xti'?t9`,s Pz+ �. `ri. � ,x.. hs ' * i e v � X l"
C S .s. :� .N e ' � v - 'v
S
V, `
TO : James E . Chandler ,
County Administrator
FROM : James W . Davis , P . E . ,
Public Works Directo
SUBJECT : SR60 Right - of - way West of I - 95 - James B . Cain Contract
REF . LETTER : William Caldwell to James Davis dated May 29 , 2001
DATE : May 30 , 2001
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
During the May 22 , 2001 meeting of the Board of County
Commissioners , the Board approved expending $ 85 , 900 for the SR60
Cain right - of - way purchase for constructing a berm along the north
side of SR60 . Since that time , Mr . Cain ' s attorney has sent to the
County a revised second addendum to the Cain contract to reduce the
cost to $ 76 , 000 and satisfy DOT related issues .
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Since the cost is $ 9 , 900 less than the Board previously approved ,
staff recommends approval of the second addendum and authorization
for the Chairman to execute . No additional funding is needed .
ATTACHMENT
Referenced letter with attachment
Second addendum
ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams , the Board
unanimously approved the second addendum to the
Contract with James B . Cain, reducing the cost to
$ 76 , 000 , and authorized the Chairman to execute
same , as recommended by staff.
ADDENDUM IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
JUNE 59 2001 �
- 118 -
_
e ,a
i 9 v1
V ' h � # r �=r +,} `f Sidi '{ryS "�t�' :'.� �� � 4�` "k� ,.. .n� � x ,. . < � �' q � 7 §. : t
> > x r s °A`1 ��" a� i". '. 1 `' � ✓ e
avu + . .,v . rYX .v's�X.xse �� zAt �. �, 4 ,at . . �> .. r , . ?aa'�' ...x'�m. s ..a whL.� � ^V n x. . � . r . � . . .� a.
.. � .. . .. � , �'A'. '-4 . . • Sv , ... ... o� .. .. . _ � a.. . v. .. . 'N:+.S :u ... a.+9 n r
w . .� ^ « .. .e . kf
Pr
: .l to'j °�, � i ✓r
t 3
s rt
v.
F s ti.
;rt c
3
,'`-e '. _. , . ' .: ca ,}'S i 3 . . iH _'y ,z' ,r s. .u. °: 7 5y ,`y. t �+ s : 3
'i,°^ r; ,•R.rs
.... .r . « ..::. . . ° ... A't'r z 4 �« 4 t •...: ° F' L ~a 42Sa2� . ��r.. � '"'
t&Lt+- �''r3>^�x` h
13 . B . VICE CHAIRMAN RUTH M . STANBRIDGE - UPDATES
( ( 11 LOST TREE ISLANDS4, 121 DEMINERALIZATION
CONCENTRATION DESIGNATION APPROVED BY
LEGISLATURE JSB 536/HB 18311[31 STORMWATER
MASTER PLAN , PHASE II , AND [ 41 ST SEBASTIAN
RIVER DE -MUCKING PROJECT)
( 1 ) Lost Tree Islands : Commissioner Stanbridge noted that the Department of
Community Affairs had adopted the final recommendation orders concerning the City of
Vero Beach ' s bridge ordinance and the Town of Indian River Shores ' density matter . Any
appeal filed could stay in the court system for years . The President of Lost Tree is still
stating that he will develop the islands but this will be very expensive and difficult . There
are land trusts prepared to purchase the islands and recommendations will be brought before
the Board soon .
(2 ) Demineralization Concentration Designation : This category has been reclassified
as "potable water byproduct " by the Legislature and the Department of Environmental
Protection will prepare regulations concerning this designation .
( 3 ) Stormwater Master Plan , Phase II : Funding has been approved in the amount of
1 . 5 million dollars for Phase 2 of the plan which was less than requested but certainly
welcome .
(4 ) St . Sebastian River De -Mucking Project : This project was also funded by the
Legislature .
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN ,
JUNE 59 20011 p ,
- 119 -
E
e
77". t
" m " 7 / .K '`^v i?'�• 4 x :- '
c y {'� 3, t3'«,, j'�`y., ¢xtg N1 , twe71 "� 1 w�•+.A'}ss'' £s, r Vis° + ' t s t r s t 4
rr "' '"�' ,, z *' ., -. .r
„ .K r , _ . . . �. , . .. :.. ` z r,._ ,. , . . . . . -s ..r, -ns » �, i :x
, .� „ . .. o. . ,.
Mur. ..,. .. : . r , x. S°. `mA � ,. .., .' � .. i . _ 'e;.. . . r . . a� , +;;. ,. s s - t ..1 ,.s'., .
.:: n T".: _ `J. 4 ,r'' h . ,±3'§.. . - ,i �'r•, 1 vP
A, .,. 'a, 1 S r v > » .� .. :� _. .n , t ... ff . . , { Y / ,. 1 . .v, ,ti!2: N M .:. .
'+ i '�`t. , �"'4 ya :. 7r,ry'.• . , x. .a_ 4` 4'. ''A"�fb'
"rx ,,. .. - ,,. .. . � x, o_ .� . �v,. a. .. , e ..b... ..r :,. , '. rr -., '> Y r-. b'xt +^
..:,:.. i��1. .. . ,tt ... � : , i-. za a s ✓: a
s1...,. 5, i . . , �.�.r 'r�na e , , . .2 SF{ v. • . <.< „ s 'i"s�a. a .. . . . f- ;crv ... ,+ ..... ,: ^•:4
3 .ti. ., . .. r x , a . ..., ._ ;.,. .$.w-. �.g;
x ....,�,... v v :.,i," , _:. .. . � -are. � . .a,y>.0 �': . 1 'k... x .. . ... .`•�..
, -s, _.. , ry z, , = ,n, . rr .: :_ r , `m `x n �+,: ,„>Es Srz t. _*�, s;�k'3 e
3"x° �. .. 'a ., . ��r ,� .. � -. '.. _ .. , .,, . .. , .> o- . , . : z .,. s t ,.„.: n .+. ,a?r`� ,,
:x. ,. .. r.... F� .», „< , . nz . � x7 a :x. . :x 5 + •''.( '�,'
s z. _ .t , :'...r: .� � . . . >FE; r , � ,.,r� ..,.9 �' .._3 -v... , . _ . 'v` r . Y a .� ..r .
,. .. .r,f 7 ..`;. 9•. m - .KS y. . ,:. , . a'. .
Sa,xn: . ,tr >.'°v,, . r r4 -F. � : ., . , . a `. ^t , _ .: • r. m.-.,.•:., t 2 ..;. 'X e
a'.
. ,, �,> ,...- r 2 . r .. i `� , a. s, >,t. r, . �:: 'Ymru.. ':,. =r .+ . �. .: ':rt � ,� .^.•�
r� � � � -ks✓v'✓. , , .� wv ��'4"r r- r, si�> `� yr �?3�4 �t� A.y � < k,., �� � ,� .
t ;. . . . .qia: - • ..., a,. , s ?;..,' -^a- ,r - , „,...nsi •T -R,. t _: zc + mak. . , m „} re ;};� r , .,
z . . ,s. .� s.,, , .xr . .-;.. x. v, d � ,,, '�,. ;"^" 4 ,r, ,� ,�"� �k ,
z k .-`"i. ,y. � r e,<,. „k.:"c ;��. - « x.:.: � x 3 ? < 4 E �' x. •r., a ` ,t• 1 fix„
"` w.r"h 5�:�fE ���' y3. . q ..�... u t �� z s
�s'�er4 � ,..� 's . r :,e a� .'- _,�..-%�vuuc, u. ,:�� s4, .�,,. y ..: �,. � `+ ,.., _ a y-� �,�,�r „ ,'a-x
. „z:" o n`+- :� a , ,�,n s� � �. �`�d�'�+�r w. � ?�r .< '�� t i:.�•� s �,
f
13 , Ce COMMISSIONER FRAN Be ADAMS — EMERGENCY
SERVICES STATION 3 (2900 43rd Avenue) AMBULANCE
SERVICE REQUEST BY VICTOR HART , SR TO
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE (ESDAC)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 30 , 2001 and a letter of May 29 , 2001 :
To : Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
Date : May 30 , 2001
Subject: STATION 3 AMBULANCE SERVICE REQUEST
From : Fran B . Adams
County Commissioner
Please place under my matters on the June 5 , 2001 agenda the attached letter dated
May 29 , 2001 , from Mr. Victor Hart, Sr. requesting ambulance service for Station
3 .
JUNE 59 2001 p �
- 120 -
x Y. ix
de sh
1
a +.n�' .'•r .r - , mp ,¢A . ' §� , _. M/� „et sr . "a � �x r;. ,� ,,.iv�x;•_ rcx c tF ry : ..,ts x xG a, ",r;-
, , , ,. - a - ; w�" z '� .s ` .e N , z,
}'
. :., y. .. t. . a_s . ., . ,u ..a . ,... �.�. r . Y: •.: : . ,.. .r 1x �.S'» M .... . >`ft, i . ,e` n
,�,. .. z;'� . , t ^�. sxu >:<'! r:'+ x „, 2` ,'�„� ,.
_z?S =. a e r;�§ y '� •a. ..- ,
w,. .vE,. .; ,.., �"... . ... . . , ' .�, x �'mk w..,. . . . : ,¢- .. F, c,^, :�. a . ,. . 4 u t� r,
, .. � G>e r. .;vt a, { a. .., s t {. , . ,...{A s 4h •v w �f "f:,: .' & q-. aY ,{
.z..., .. z:. .,. .: , .. , 99Y .. . , ,..- a . .r- . : .s,. , �. , "� ,t.�.,•� _ -„4 , �:,,.,. { d -. ,.. s
v, . . .,, z aw. . r : r.. ,nom s sv=`# a« �: n.��.^ .
'•uN . . ...2 .. w "�3 .. .,. ' .. .'h, n „. "{"=v i. 'Y* c. ., 'Y,ya a..:.,%rr ,:n,. .. `•. ,:. :,. , ;:.
.. s ,i` , d Xx;.a44. ... , �' » ^F§'� ,. , ^€” ya-., .. e. n .,x,..'C:p�.,^g. � , :;�'<. .. -s. ,..Y,'. r ”
,>...A. , v h. . .. _ . ,.: •� ,.,,. `.W; ,-:.r`d ,. ?.; : .,r�.. ~Y -3r,-,.< F- r , z t t '�
.,r�'x a? , ,s�, . ., 4, ,,. r ��k. F '.' . , , �S a. L' .,,` { *''-..;� su � ,�„
:.,.t 4: s ”` ,,�. . ..'m-`; , ...,.> : ... k. _w;� .. tt+ a . ' .<.. zEs.r. . ,.>; ,ro:,>. x .,. a -
x,:,4 f+..ti ,;, ,,. _ . +� r ?fv L . r �. >.. . gG w .� .a r ,^li•.ra -, r x
. . �;� .<. , u . . . _. ..rx. � - ` , ;...r+,Sz . ., o*w'?, . r, . -=:>.. .4'u , +�r�: Nr,- ,. �. o-. .,
..> ra .._ -,.. .. >r 7 .., r . ¢” ,a.;:: $ •Y h> 'ro�,. - r *'F„Ft .5..r>”, ,ss4 n
-C"�s` �'�.xex� n ;. ��"� . ,' ; ,x . ..59, � ,. .,.,f s . 1,,.-,.. `.,, ^]`, r„..> '• v , :.,:.5 u rn :
'& e 3 , tx , `. � . , ..,. se'r” � t r`e .S',.. e
� . ,< {,,.tr e, - .,. 4w . f,G re . t - .., �.. . �� �._>- , ... ...�.. . -::)-s .'n: .: �*: r ,a ,_m. ,�•).
, : ... . c - .:, kr f . t :, ,. g>. ,, a .#s..?�a 'F;s -? m zr ,..:er+`�,
t ,.�✓ .>, � �': . . s. r v� N � ,.,,. . v. F .. r ,..... e x v. S 'x ,.: r . ,.,.... i
, t> _ ..,, � `s ; . .. h � .. . ': .c �a �3 ,x?z�: r a ��'t a`sz..a'� `q >� .. .t r- �..."
s, z ,= tts '.•£ „s,. . , .: , .. y . ,. . . >`r - , ... . � � - , ,, a ,:" a = . �a".<.,,. -3, � .� , '�+ ,n. .:. .:
ar , • . .. . . . F -» . ..:, ,2' ,.. a „ ^*m ai;, , y .> '�< x nw ,4,.,�.t.I . .;*e s. . , s.�,•, C
avr ,..;.. " .�,., r";..,, < v " _ � x. ,., ,. . . .., ✓:�. r' - � 'wi .. v I. > .... � 5 ,v u.,x
'� u t x:.0 .�.. t i d..,. k [. a 5v a5. r 4�Y. . i` � . fir. rv' +,F'� ,� , .n , d .�
kv- .. ;i- *". ,t t. < , �` , , .. .: .'s•. s- , �., 1 � x..»z. s: , h , >, °,::. � 4 � �=" �h
m.. wea' a _'z;-.;� „tit y - i ,^�'�?^' t` � :_a. rx
u '£><n.o n. .z .. ., ..- . fit. �.,. . : � .. , .fFk .. _ . .:w. . : "�i-:F:. F�"., 4 . F : s ,. +...r->F 3'. ,
s r F ,��, „ . a -::. + .;k:'S s °� •s r �`'}? 'Y�„ ` o-'$ h:. n :�' .., i .:a.
_ �Sx , .t,�a� .� »9X "4s... ," rw �assa �5�'hvf• . . , . �.�:.,R a..-.>^ n . xaeam.,}_. x., u,= �, , .. a_.. . .,.�:? ?i �. .. eti,x
tea ,. . :.:,; . , 1a .,*,r4'sx ., s r. %s.. .�1 .. . . . .� u,.am.'F :.,la; . «,.� �.aaM'd' �,. �':u:.< _.,r, ) "r„s:�eic�' .9.e' ' .�ESa^,#s..,.�',
i,. .�`_�., rm�v3••ux's, nn44. . . .
-
+ .Y ^�� � �� � � x � '�"� *�'`�' k2 � ,p"�'x�fi � •` .v„'y}`ps�i�'^ ��h ,.r `''�� €i^,�ffi`"-i° �':^� }~ � &
_V �p m { � '" R `Y aup, r
+ qa `yJ hR .,ys YW` 3 ✓d7S+ ^#�8 yY , .k;.;, Y' 'V 3, '` ?, y i7'Y -
fhS�+C'
.. ., � e Y,+ r w hiE ... '' $'�' � v'd.+"�Y,�ro F ';� 's��* fA "£Y✓ - c: �� ,
Ic �� �'l�
+ , r
17
1
Ma } 29 , 2001
Fran Adams
Board of County Commissioners
1840 25t' Street
Vero Beach , FI 32960
Dear Fran ,
It has come to my attention that Station 3 is the only station in the County that
does not have an ambulance . As Chairman of the Emergency Services District Advisory
Committee, could you and the Commissioners provide an ambulance service that is
closer to Gifford ' I know we have a lot of calls and that our area deserves what the rest
of the county has already .
Thank vou .
Si ce�1
Victor Ha Sr.
Commissioner Adams requested approval for an ambulance to be located at the 45tH
Street COPE Office and operational funding beginning August 1St through the end of this
fiscal year to include employment of 7 additional paramedics , with full funding for the next
fiscal year ,
Commissioner Stanbridge pointed out that level of service needs had been referred
back to Emergency Services Director Doug Wright and County Administrator Jim Chandler .
She felt very strongly that these issues should be the province of management staff.
' + County Administrator Jim Chandler stated that staff has been investigating expansion
of the level of service and is preparing to bring recommendations to the Board during the
budget workshops .
Commissioner Stanbridge also noted that these needs will be addressed in the Small
Area Plan for the Gifford community ,
JUNE 59 2001 f, ,
SA I I U ' %
,. - 121 -
dK 'a Chp�i,.f �.. u.i �tidx
IPA
N
+Y F
rk X
Cf 4 CT -d f
a x ' n,,. '"`^U� `� � � '�Tr'..� � � +�. . . �' x- "�i � V •:+�� �b �. .i} t -'
''''tl-'- �` A�, � S '!'�-2x:
SI k'
d
+ h
S M1 f
$x �
xr :, - � 2 ."�b�{ � �� ,x � g.. , '��t, p, -�wr,�*,`'. t:. s ",4 ' r � y.4s'.' , ,,.
,�, ,+..; '• h,`4, � ��� �.";;»
x
ss
rx t s r- . m
� d *tix 5 'v x :ay � a1. � d e - c 4Ea � � .z,n"1'a:
. `d P - - .xv x- . %".:. �,�' M, .,3 " M '^ ? � x-'�. E
pv
x`
Victor Hart, Sr. questioned why Station 3 in the Gifford area was the only County
area left without an ambulance and paramedics . He expressed his concerns that a fire truck
with a paramedic might be called away from a child ' s medical emergency to fight a fire . He
believed that the money runs out when it comes to the Gifford community .
Commissioner Stanbridge emphasized that management will bring recommendations
which will cover the whole County .
General discussion ensued regarding the number of calls in the area, the response time
to those calls , and the staffing of other emergency stations in the County .
Commissioner Adams noted that Emergency Services Director Doug Wright stated
that he would be able to fund the $ 50 , 000 for the balance of this year to fund that station and
she has already confirmed the use of the COPE building through discussions with School
District Superintendent Dearing and Sheriff Raymond .
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams ,
SECONDED by Commissioner Macht that an
ambulance service be provided to the Gifford
community at the 45 `h Street COPE office , with staff
to come back with the cost and funding for the
balance of this fiscal year and full funding for the
next fiscal year .
Commissioner Tippin agreed that the ambulance should be provided but felt it would
more appropriately be brought up at the budget workshops which are just a few weeks away .
JUNE 59 2001 CC
� F
— 122 — t
F �
a
$`� x }'r,., ' x $ ; }`"" 4y°'s k5^, x A=,k a` i 4 } x 'E ,• ,n a :y�' ' S4j 3x"; Jv?k r ;
', . t Lax , I'-' _' i `'" .,',`-'ro ' � k
�i yv
�
� � 3`}Yw* ' ° si .*Lx -kx �* x
�^ � �°: fiR a1xc .c`8, 4 '�"✓, ..Ya i�`i' :m FZt � v a �[ ='F ` z
. 31
s
X _ ! " ' �5` i� ", 'r•x „"< xaae?' i' 3 c;d�`a� m, .^c � b �.'3'§-�s; - ' . `"�w' - 3, ,s':
._ S�' ''.�'c ,§� � i � �S€ �i' '.4y s x
. .,t •. � .. , `' 'i" n � , . '` : . v,�* 5 .r" +� . .. �x ,7aia,`'...v- 9 n a'! x ;•^i,.
.- `�+e: - � s� 7r'fY, J`t;�' '� 9�1 _
'_z r•, t ' k,�f;.4 �.'. :. . ':r z" e4 w 5�.. x � ,n ' .�„ �ityh _ E -pf 9 � cF
� T -t*" j "
s
Blades Robinson , 2126 Cavalla Road , a 20 -year veteran of the Fire Department ,
commented that the fire divisions are underutilized , and Chairman Ginn asked him to limit
his remarks to the issue presently before the Board .
Mr . Robinson believed the Fire Department has the ability to provide the service and
3 ,
personnel required .
Frank Coffey , 1335 River Ridge Drive , believed the matter should more properly be
brought up at the budget workshops and questioned the need for an Advisory Committee if
the Board is not going to follow their recommendations .
Bruce Anderson , 926 28 " Avenue , supported the request for the ambulance but
questioned the funding, and Chairman Ginn responded that the Emergency Services District
has a 3 . 5 mill cap which has not yet been reached .
Mr . Robinson then questioned whether this is a policy or service decision being made
today , and Chairman Ginn responded that this is a service only decision .
Joe Earman , 4375 9" Lane , noted that Station 3 also covers his area and he felt that
staff needs to make this decision .
Commissioner Adams commented that the issue which was sent back to staff was a
' recommendation from ESDAC to have an outside consultant look at the levels of service .
This issue is confined to Station 3 in Gifford ,
Commissioner Stanbridge read an excerpt from the May 1 , 2001 minutes where the
issue was returned to the Emergency Services Director because the issue had become a `
politically divisive one . She reiterated that she would prefer to have the matter discussed at
the budget workshops .
JUNE 59 2001f� IPG ,.
- 123 -
t c x b
i
Y "rvn, _ r ' '�R' Sy x xb. a�, '",. ," ' d�"Y.t „� ��''��.'� ?«ti4w mak. �` ,�$'q 3k+ '�
.;.� � �4 a i > , a �" iP ' rte, +• yl
o '
In k �..�� wt +{ w� � wx' �. E qy:;¢:� f ,��5 # i,:� #!� «4 �; , issiy rJ p�,5s' �e i't ,.z ,bra. t
F `> 2 kSky� r , ,y k , > , "��,� .s
fi .f "� �"". ,; �,�` '
«
".
' P
y y
o, �a
2
9 0
pa
IC
Arthur Harris , President of Gifford Progressive Civic League , emphasized that he
has had strong concerns about the available emergency service for some time : He pointed
out that the service is coming from the east side of the railroad tracks while the need lies on
the west side . There are only 4 crossings which could all be blocked ,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and
the Board, by a 3 - 2 vote ( Commissioners Tippin and
Stanbridge opposed) approved establishing an
1- 4 ambulance service at Station 3 effective August 1 ,
2001 ; directed staff to research and advise the costs
and funding sources ; and directed that such
ambulance service be fully funded for the next fiscal
year, 2001 -2002 .
13 . D . COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MRCHT - PERSONAL
COMMENTS
Commissioner Macht thanked everyone for the many kindnesses shown to his family
r . at the death of his son , William .
14 . A . EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None ,
JUNE 512001 n
- 124 -
,c+¢
tc
t
t�
i .. s .. . °. ' ?.. . . . �
s
>x�
s °�� ' & ^ ;� �" �•�,: � ' �€�' �h~ `rr tF�sda�n.y `�'�-� "�' ��"'� .��. �.b°t' :;a �
��.�, v 7 A:'< Rx, �: '� �+a' zy. } ��k �`'"" � � � .�r
s`}: , u a� �p K .�. E£'� ��b� � 2 C Y�{��' w9�S,--�• &'+«' � � a� '�� 1J°,�ti^k ...�>�� �'x�
£6�� $k��h ,s �s!a � r.�:`�FX�:'v�k, � , Trow?. lY..�. +�
;F,. . , � , . � es . . .� , s- : . �. . x � �a s,_ , ,. . .. . rs: ,. `� `" a :�N.0 ; • i �v":.
, �a:'.: � . �f5� � s . y r=.:«:;. � s'.
a �' �. k � ,g € , � ,t.. t -.:, w� ,i : , :: . ,f ,.. r ... :,,tea' e +-..wv.. S s-i` �,,"�, _ .
.. . �e : f: , , , n a.q. . ], ..,� `Y" ' r aa?'n :•�:'' a
< .e^3 �
If If
fIl
If
16
f
I 4 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District . Those
Minutes are being prepared separately .
HeCe ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
If
Iff
None .
There being no further business , on Motion duly made , seconded and carried , the
Board adjourned at 1 : 33 p . m .
ATTEST :
J . K . arton, Clerk Caroline D . Ginn , Chai an
s
4 ..
Minutes Approved _3 U 1
r
JUNE 59 2001
1 U ro
- 125 -
r If
.�w
r S
,
, . v ,aY . .,a, g , i :;, ta., ,.,f.,h •9`sur d fiA„ x ��. � 4*� �x , .,. § '�' �_4.;, '�
_> iy?' ��%,;�' •, � , .b . , '. .. ,� �a3 4k'�'e ' ,�ra�h°�z. .§uz. '�'t a�^.�.��5. »?a+A,i . zea .., ,'dvi:,.
�' .'k'�' "�i� >, . �. ''v,::x�r� .3� ��:{"i�a .�',L.,a.:Fr:A"'.h,���'�s+ ��,,.%zf �s6,` �, ,.. �S4::i36n �i ,r?��,t. ��.� .. , . ,_ u�m�i+'a�.'a