HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/23/2003MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2003 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
•
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman
Fran B. Adams
Thomas S. Lowther
Arthur R. Neuberger
District 3
District 5
District 1
District 4
District 2
James E Chandler, County Administrator
William G. Collins II, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Fred Foy Strang
First Presbyterian Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Comm. Thomas S. Lowther
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITIONS: 9.A.1. Additional Backup
13.B Additional Backup
DELETION: Page 313 of 9.A.2. (Duplication of previous page/error corrected.)
DEFERRAL • 7.G. Resolutions Concerning Boards and Committees (Revisions)
BACKUP
PAGES
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
A. Beach Restoration Presentation
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of August 19, 2003
1
La
1
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received and Placed on File in Office of Clerk to the Board:
1. Report of Convictions, August, 2003
2. IRC Hospital District Meeting Change from
September 18, 2003 to September 24, 2003
3. I.R. Mosquito Control District Annual Local
Government Financial Report for FY 2001/02
and copy of Financial Statement Audit for FY
Ended 09/30/02
B Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated September 11, 2003)
C. Annual Contracts for County Officers
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
D. Children's Services Advisory Committee Contract for
Agency Funding
(memorandum dated September 16, 2003)
E Final Payment and Release of Retainage Great Lakes Dredge
and Dock Co. Sectors 1 & 2 Beach Restoration
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
F. Bid No. 5034 — 16" Sewage Force Main on Old Dixie High-
way from North to Central County Wastewater Treatment
Plant — Approval of Change Order No. 1 and Final Payment
to Contract
(memorandum dated September 10, 2003)
G. Revised Resolutions Concerning Boards and Committees
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
H. Resolution Canceling Taxes on Acquired Property
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
I. Request from Tax Collector for Extension of Tax Roll
during Adjustment Board Hearings
(memorandum dated September 12, 2003)
BACKUP
PAGES
2-9
10-16
17-26
27-31
32-41
42-80
81-88
89-90
J. Bid Award: IRC #6014 Annual Bid for Janitorial Supplies
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003) 91-101
K. IRC Bid #5096 Golden Sands Boardwalk Re -Decking
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003) 102-116
nit
f'=
2
9 J
•
BACKUP
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): PAGES
L IRC Bid #5097 Painting of Concession Stands and Press
Boxes at the County Sports Complex
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003) 117-127
M. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 020
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003) 128-130
N. Annual Floodplain Management Progress Report for the
Community Rating System (CRS) of the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP)
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003)
131-141
O. IRC Bid #6017 Annual Bid for Reinforced Concrete Pipe
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003) 142-158
P Cooperative Facility Lease Agreement for Old Douglas
School Cafeteria Building
(memorandum dated September 16, 2003)
Q. Re-execution of Sovereign Submerged Lands Easement
Agreement from the Board of Trustees of the Internal
Improvements Trust Fund of the State of Florida
(memorandum dated September 16, 2003)
R. Indian River County Bid #6012 Annual Bid for Limerock
and/or Coquina Rock
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
159-184
185-195
196-217
S. IRC Bid #6011 Annual Bid for Shell Material
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003) 218-230
T IRC Bid #6009 Annual Bid for Road Stabilization Material
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003) 231-253
U. IRC Bid #6018 Annual Bid for General Fill Dirt
(memorandum dated September 16, 2003) 254-266
V IRC Bid #6010 Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving and Resur-
facing
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
3
i
267-293
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR
APPROXIMATELY 181.2 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 58th AVENUE AND 57th
STREET, FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
(UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES); TO RS -6, SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE) AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION,
SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE
Bayer Corporation's request to rezone 181.2 acres
from A-1 to RS -6
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
2. Elson Smith's Request for Abandonment of the
Portion of Orange Street Located between County
Road 510 and 46th Avenue (Legislative)
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from Fred Mensing to discuss proposal
to settle suit and gain access to Kirrie Industrial
Site
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003)
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
1. Scheduled for Public Hearing October 7, 2003:
Kingslake Subdivision Petition Water Service
Resolution III
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
2. Scheduled for Public Hearing October 7, 2003:
Michael Baratta's request to rezone 36.6 acres
from A-1 to RM -6
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
A. MESA Park Auction
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003)
4
BACKUP
PAGES
294-310
311-328
329
330
331
332-338
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS (cont'd.):
B. Retirees Health Insurance
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
B. Emergency Services
1. Approval of Renewal of 800 MHz Communications
System Infrastructure Maintenance Contract with
Communications International, Inc.
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
C. General Services
1. Presentation of Phase I, Programming and Program
Validation Report, Architectural Services Contract
for Design of the New County Administration
Complex
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003)
2. Easement Request by BellSouth Telecommunications,
Inc.
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003)
3. Contracts for Infrastructure for Old Fellsmere
School
(memorandum dated September 17, 2003)
Human Resources
None
E. Human Services
None
F. Leisure Services
None
G. Office of Management and Budget
None
H. Recreation
None
5
•
BACKUP
PAGES
339-342
343-348
349
350-362
363-372
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
I. Public Works
1. Approval of Work Order #10 for the East Roseland
Stormwater Improvement Project
(memorandum dated September 15, 2003)
Approval of Professional Service Agreements for
Annual Land Survey Services Contract
(memorandum dated September 9, 2003)
Utilities Services
None
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
BACKUP
PAGES
373-381
382-449
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn, Vice Chairman
1. Direction to the County Attorney regarding an
Ordinance Prohibiting Public Nudity
(no backup provided)
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Thomas S. Lowther
Commissioner Arthur R. Neuberger
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS and BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Authorization to Survey the Storni Water
Management System of the Landfill Site
(memorandum dated September 10, 2003)
C. Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
•
BACKUP
PAGES
450-456
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://www.ircgov.com
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday
1.00 p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 nobn until 5:00 p.m.
Meeting broadcast same as above on Comcast Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.
•
7
L) J
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 23, 2003
1 CALL TO ORDER 1
2. INVOCATION 1
3 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 1
5 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 2
5.A. Beach Restoration Presentation by Coastal Resources Manager Jonathan C.
Gorham, PhD 2
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 4
7. CONSENT AGENDA 4
7.A. Reports Placed on File in the Office of the Clerk to the Board 4
7.B. Approval of Warrants 4
7.C. Annual Contracts for County Officers - County Administrator and
Executive Aide to the Board 5
7.D. Children's Services Advisory Committee - Contracts for Agencies'
Funding - Boys & Girls Club of Indian River County (South County Club,
Sebastian Club and Youth Volunteer Corps); CEBH at IRMC (Camp
Manatee Therapeutic Camp); Children's Home Society (Independent
Living); CCCR - Community Child Care Resources (Children in Centers
and Psychological Program); Cultural Council of Indian River County
(Summer Camp and After -School Arts Program), Exchange Club Castle
(Safe Families and Valued Visits); G.R.O.W. (G.R.O.W. Kids - Parent
Support); Healthy Start of Indian River County (Healthy Families and
TLC); Hibiscus Children's Center (Crisis Nursery) H O P E (H O P E );
Homeless Assistance Center (Assets Build Futures); New Testament Faith
Ministries (King's Kids Care Center); Samaritan Center - Catholic
Charities (Samaritan Center); St. Peters Human Services (Boys Training &
1
•
Development Camp and Village of Excellence Training-Girls); Substance
Abuse Council (Right Choice Program and LifeSkills and Dasie Hope
Center); CEBH Center for Emotional/Behavioral Health (Mental Health)
6
7 E Beach Restoration Sectors 1 and 2 - Final Payment and Release of
Retainage - Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company 6
7.F. Bid #5034 - 16" Sewage Force Main - Old Dixie Highway (from North to
Central County Wastewater Treatment Plant - Change Order No. 1 and
Final Payment - Tri-Sure Corporation of Auburndale Florida 7
7.G. Revised Resolutions Concerning Boards and Committees 7
7.H. Resolution No. 2003-118 - Cancelling Taxes on Acquired Property (Gen
Development, Inc. - Right-of-Way at 5th Street SW and 20th Avenue) 8
7.I. Request from Tax Collector for Extension of Tax Roll During Value
Adjustment 8
7.J. Bid #6014 - Annual Bid for Janitorial Supplies - Janitorial Depot of
America, Inc., Melbourne, Florida 8
7.K. Bid #5096 - Golden Sands Boardwalk Re-Decking - SLM Services, Inc. 9
7 L Bid 45097 - County Sports Complex - Painting of Concession Stands and
Press Boxes -Mark's Painting, Inc 10
7.M. Resolution Na 2003-119 - Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 020 10
7.N. Annual Floodplain Management Progress Report - Community Rating
System (CRS) of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) - IRC
UI\IFIED LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY 10
7.0. Bid 46017 - Annual Bid for Reinforced Concrete Pipe - Central Florida
Industrial Supply Company 11
7.P. Resolution No. 2003-120 - Old Douglass School Cafeteria Building -
Cooperative Facility Use Lease Agreement with West Wabasso Progressive
Civic Club, Inc. and Dasie Bridgewater Hope Center, Inc. - Lease
Amendment - Economic Opportunities Council of Indian River County,
Inc. 12
7.Q. CR 512 Roadway Improvements, Project No. 9611 - Re-Execution of
Sovereign Submerged Lands Easement Originally Executed August 6,
2002 - Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the
State of Florida - No. 40008, BOT File No. 310225313, PA No. 4-061-
56415-1 - Bridge Improvements Over Sebastian River South Prong 13
7.R. Bid #6012 - Annual Bid for Limerock and/or Coquina Rock - Dickerson
Florida, Inc. - Blackhawk Quarry Company of Florida, Inc. 13
7.S. Bid #6011 - Annual Bid for Shell Material - Dickerson Florida, Inc. 14
7.T. Bid #6009 - Annual Bid for Road Stabilization Material - Dickerson
Florida, Inc and Blackhawk Quarry Company of Florida, Inc. 15
2
7.U. Bid 116018 - Annual Bid for General Fill Dirt - Henry Fischer & Sons, Inc.
16
TV. Bid #6010 - Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving and Resurfacing - Community
Asphalt Corporation - Dickerson Florida, Inc. 17
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2003-033 - REZONING OF 181.2
ACRES FROM A-1 TO RS -6 - SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE
AND 57TH STREET - REQUESTED BY BAYER CORPORATION -
NEWPORT PROPERTIES (Quasi -Judicial) 18
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2003-121 - ABANDONMENT OF
THE PORTION OF ORANGE STREET LOCATED BETWEEN CR 510 AND
46TH AVENUE REQUESTED BY ELSON SMITH (Legislative) 29
9 B 1 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM FRED MENSING TO
DISCUSS PROPOSAL TO SETTLE SUIT AND GAIN ACCESS TO KIRRIE
INDUSTRIAL SITE 33
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER
7, 2003 33
1. Kingslake Subdivision Petition Water Service Resolution III 33
2. Michael Baratta's Request to Rezone 36.6 Acres from A-1 to RM -6
33
10.A. MESA PARK AUCTION - AUTHORIZATION TO BID ON EQUIPMENT
AND STRUCTURES 34
10 B RETIREES HEALTH INSURANCE 34
11 B 1 RENEWAL OF 800 MHz COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH
COMMLNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 38
11.C.1.
NEW COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX - DONADIO &
ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, P.A./SONG & ASSOCIATES, INC. -
PRESENTATION OF PHASE I, PROGRAMMING AND PROGRAM
VALIDATION REPORT, ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT
FOR DESIGN 38
3
I1
rla
•
11.C.2.
EASEMENT -BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. - LOT
9, BLOCK 3, VALENCIA PARK SUBDIVISION - NORTHEAST
CORNER OF 43RD AVENUE AND 14TH PLACE - SOLICITATION
OF BIDS AUTHORIZED 44
11.C.3. OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL - INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACTS -
STANDARD BID REQUIREMENTS WAIVED - BIP DiPIETRO
ELECTRIC INC. - BOBBY'S PLUMBING, INC. - CARE -FULL AIR
CONDITIONING, INC. 45
11.I.1. EAST ROSELAND STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -
WORK ORDER #10 - CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. 46
11.I.2. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR
ANNUAL SURVEYING AND MAPPING SERVICES - BURDETTE &
ASSOCIATES, INC , CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., CREECH
ENGINEERING, INC. KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
MASTELLER, MOLER & REED, INC., AND MORGAN EKLUND,
INC. (2003-2004 - IRC PROJECT NO. 3090 46
13 B VICE CHAIRMAN GINN - DIRECTIONS TO COUNTY ATTORNEY
REGARDING AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PUBLIC NUDITY 47
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 48
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 49
14.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD 49
4
Awls
September 23, 2003
The Board of County Commissioners ofIndian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, September 23, 2003. Present were Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman; Caroline D.
Ginn, Vice Chairman; Commissioners Fran B Adams, Thomas S. Lowther; and Arthur R.
Neuberger. Also present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; William G.
Collins II, County Attorney; Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to the Board; and Patricia
Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Rev. Fred Foy Strang, First Presbyterian Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Lowther led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Macht announced that Item 7.G. was deferred (to be brought back in
September 23, 2003
1
rfl
iS:ii
•
October), backup for Item 13.B.1. was distributed, and additional backup for 9.A.1. was
provided. Also, it was announced that page 313 of the backup was to be eliminated
(duplicate page/error).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lowther, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously made the above
changes to the agenda.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
5.A. Beach Restoration Presentation by Coastal Resources Manager
Jonathan C. Gorham, PhD
Coastal Resources Manager Jonathan C. Gorham PhD gave a presentation that he and
Michael R. Barnett, P E had given to the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association.
He talked about the challenges faced in Indian River County's first large scale beach
restoration at Sectors 1 & 2 and noted three other restoration projects have been identified
in our Beach Preservation Plan (Wabasso, known as Sector 3; downtown Vero Beach,
Sector 5; and 7,000 feet in south county or Sector 7). He advised that Sectors 1 and 2
(13,281 feet of shoreline) were jointly funded with the Florida Department ofEnvironmental
Protection. He described the unique design challenges which included some near shore
reefs and a search for sand sources to give the desired result. He pointed out this sector is
located within the Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuge. Other challenges to consider were
turtle nesting, turtle foraging habitat, and the endangered southeastern beach mouse. A dune
was constructed which helped them succeed in all their environmental preservation efforts.
He described the sand sources considered; sandfrom the south borrow site, a distance of
September 23, 2003
2
• •
17 nautical miles, was the most desirable. He described how the sand was vacuumed from
the ocean bottom, transported by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, Inc., and spread
upon the beach. He showed before and after photos of the newly -constructed beach and the
dune plantings of already well-established sea oaks. He reported there are over 800 sea
turtle nests on the new beach. They will continue to monitor the sea turtle nests and habitats.
The shoreline will be surveyed for the next 5 years to determine the performance of the new
beach. A 5.2 acre artificial reef (of quarried limestone) will be bid in October 2003 and
constructed offshore in 2004 for mitigation purposes. He summarized the following project
highlights: successful restoration of 2.6 miles of critically -eroding shoreline through
implementation of the County's first beach restoration project; payment for a volume of
536,505 cubic yards of sand; installation of 141,000 dune plants installed with no irrigation;
and no marine turtle nests requiring relocation. In closing, he acknowledged the many
contributors to this project.
In response to an inquiry, Dr. Gorham advised that the new beach did very well in its
first major stonii test (high surf and waves from Hurricane Isabel). He measured the beach
before and after and those measurements were within a couple of feet of each other. He
noted there were no escarpments and there was no significant erosion. He believed we have
a beach we can be very proud of (CLERK'S NOTE A copy of Dr. Gorham's visual
presentation has been filed with the backup of this meeting.)
The Commissioners congratulated Dr. Gorham on a job well done.
Ralph Sexton, 8005 37th Street, Chairman of the Beach and Shore Preservation
Committee, stressed how lucky we are to have Jonathan who did a wonderful job restoring
this beach. He said "at raise time, don't forget him".
September 23, 2003
3
-4R
I 3
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of August 19, 2003. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
minutes of August 19, 2003, as written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. Reports Placed on File in the Office of the Clerk to the Board
Report of Convictions, August 2003;
Indian River County Hospital District Meeting Change from September 18,
2003 to September 24, 2003 at 6:30 pm;
Indian River Mosquito Control District Annual Local Government Financial
Report for FY 2001-02 and copy of Financial Statement Audit for FY Ended
09/30/02.
7. B. Approval of Warrants
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk for the period September 5-11,
2003, as requested
September 23, 2003
4
• •
7.C. Annual Contracts for County Officers - County Administrator
and Executive Aide to the Board
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously approved
contracts as negotiated with Administrator James E Chandler
and Executive Aide Kimberly Massung as presented in the
backup.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.D. Children's Services Advisory Committee - Contracts for
Agencies' Funding - Boys & Girls Club of Indian River County
(South County Club, Sebastian Club and Youth Volunteer Corps);
CEBH at IRMC (Camp Manatee Therapeutic Camp); Children's
Home Society (Independent Living); CCCR - Community Child Care
Resources (Children in Centers and Psychological Program);
Cultural Council of Indian River County (Summer Camp and After -
School Arts Program); Exchange Club Castle (Safe Families and
Valued Visits); G.R.O. W. (G.R.O. W. Kids - Parent Support); Healthy
Start of Indian River County (Healthy Families and TLC); Hibiscus
Children's Center (Crisis Nursery); H.O.P.E. (H.O.P.E.); Homeless
September 23, 2003
5
E''
Assistance Center (Assets Build Futures); New Testament Faith
Ministries (King's Kids Care Center); Samaritan Center - Catholic
Charities (Samaritan Center); St. Peters Human Services (Boys
Training & Development Camp and Village of Excellence Training -
Girls); Substance Abuse Council (Right Choice Program and
LifeSkills and Dasie Hope Center); CEBH Center for
Emotional/Behavioral Health (Mental Health)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Children's Services Advisory Committee contract
form for funding each of the agencies listed on the Funding
Information Sheet for FY 2003-04 and authorized the Chairman
to execute each contract after those agencies have executed
same, as requested in the memorandum.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.E. Beach Restoration Sectors 1 and 2 - Final Payment and Release
of Retainage - Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
application for final payment and release of the retainage in the
amount of $545,268 to the Great Lakes Dock and Dredge
September 23, 2003
6
• .
Company from the Beach Preservation Fund, as recommended
in the memorandum. (NOTE• Costs associated with this
payment are eligible for cost-sharing at a 75% State/25% Local
level with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
under Grant Agreement 98IR1.)
7.F. Bid #5034 -16" Sewage Force Main - Old Dixie Highway (from
North to Central County Wastewater Treatment Plant- Change Order
No. 1 and Final Payment - Tri -Sure Corporation of Auburndale,
Florida
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECO\DED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Change
Order No. 1 and Pay Request No. 4 and final payment to Tri -
Sure Corporation in the amount of $146,327.73, as
recommended in the memorandum.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.G. Revised Resolutions Concerning Boards and Committees
DEFERRED
September 23, 2003
7
•
1:
7.H. Resolution No. 2003-118 - Cancelling Taxes on Acquired
Property (Gen Development, Inc. - Right -of -Way at 5th Street SW
and 20th Avenue)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2003-118 cancelling certain taxes upon publicly
owned lands, pursuant to section 196.28, Florida Statutes. (Gen
Development, Inc. Right -of -Way at 5th Street SW and 20th
Avenue)
7.I. Request from Tax Collector for Extension of Tax Roll During
Value Adjustment Board Hearings
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously ordered the tax
roll to be extended prior to the completion of the Value
Adjustment Board hearings, as requested and recommended in
the memorandum.
7.J. Bid #6014 - Annual Bid for Janitorial Supplies - Janitorial
Depot of America, Inc., Melbourne, Florida
September 23, 2003
8
• •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SFCONDFD BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#6014 to Janitorial Depot of America, Inc., Melbourne, FL, as
the overall lowest most responsive and responsible bidder
meeting specifications as set out in the Invitation to Bid;
established an open-end contract for the period October 1, 2003
through September 30, 2004, with the same vendor; and
authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for
two (2) additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory
perfoimance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best
interest ofthe County, all as recommended in the memorandum.
CONTRACT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7.K. Bid #5096 - Golden Sands Boardwalk Re -Decking - SLM
Services, Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#5096 to SLM Services, Inc. as the lowest most responsive and
responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the
Invitation to Bid, as recommended in the memorandum.
September 23, 2003
9
'
7.L. Bid #5097 - County Sports Complex - Painting of Concession
Stands and Press Boxes -Mark's Painting, Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#5097 to Mark's Painting, Inc., in the amount of $4,200.00, as
the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the
specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid, as
recommended in the memorandum.
7.M. Resolution No. 2003-119 - Miscellaneous Budget Amendment
020
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2003-119 amending the Fiscal Year 2002-2003
budget.
7.N. Annual Floodplain Management Progress Report - Community
Rating System (CRS) of the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) - IRC UNIFIED LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
September 23, 2003
10
• •
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted the CRS
floodplain management annual progress report for the IRCLMS
adopted November 1999 by Resolution No. 99-125, as
recommended in the memorandum.
7.0. Bid #6017 - Annual Bid for Reinforced Concrete Pipe - Central
Florida Industrial Supply Company
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#6017 to Central Florida Industrial Supply Company as the
lowest and most responsive bidder meeting the specifications as
set forth in the Invitation to Bid; established an open-end
contract for the period of October 1, 2003 through September
30, 2004, with the same vendor; and authorized the Purchasing
Manager to renew this contract for two (2) additional one (1)
year periods subject to satisfactory performance, zero cost
increase, vendor acceptance and the determination that renewal
of this annual contract is in the best interest of the County, all
as recommended in the memorandum.
September 23, 2003
CONTRACT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11
7.P. Resolution No. 2003-120 - Old Douglass School Cafeteria
Building - Cooperative Facility Use Lease Agreement with West
Wabasso Progressive Civic Club, Inc. and Dasie Bridgewater Hope
Center, Inc. - Lease Amendment - Economic Opportunities Council
of Indian River County, Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2003-120 approving a Cooperative Facility
Lease Agreement with the West Wabasso Progressive Civic
Club, Inc. and the Dasie Bridgewater Hope Center, Inc., a
program of the Substance Abuse Council of Indian River
County, Inc. for the use of the Old Douglass School Cafeteria
Building at the Old Douglass Elementary School Site; and
approved the Lease Amendment with the Economic
Opportunities Council of Indian River County, Inc., as
recommended in the memorandum.
COOPERATIVE FACILITY LEASE AND LEASE AMENDMENT ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
September 23, 2003
12
• •
7. Q. CR 512 Roadway Improvements, Project No. 9611 - Re -
Execution of Sovereign Submerged Lands Easement Originally
Executed August 6 2002 - Board of Trustees of the Internal
Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida - No. 40008, BOT
File No. 310225313, PA No. 4-061-56415-1 - Bridge Improvements
Over Sebastian River South Prong
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to execute the Sovereign Submerged Lands Easement
Agreement, as recommended in the memorandum.
EASEMENT HAS BEEN RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS
AND THE ORIGINAL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.R. Bid #6012 - Annual Bid for Limerock and/or Coquina Rock
Dickerson Florida, Inc. - Blackhawk Quarry Company of Florida,.
Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded items #1
through 4 to Dickerson Florida, Inc. as the lowest and most
responsive bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the
Invitation to Bid; awarded Item #5 to multiple vendors:
September 23, 2003
13
p'
Invitation to Bid; awarded Item #5 to multiple vendors:
Dickerson Florida, Inc. and Blackhawk Quarry Company of
Florida, Inc. as the bidders meeting the specifications as set out
in the Invitation to Bid; authorized establishment of an open-
end contract for the period of October 1, 2003 through
September 30, 2004 with the same vendors; and authorized the
Purchasing Manager to renew these contracts for two (2)
additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory
performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of these annual contracts are in the
best interest of the County, as recommended in the
memorandum. (NOTE• Last year's expenditures totaled
$95,000.00 for Zones A,B,C, and County pick-up, Zone D was
added to this year's bid. The projected expenditures for 2004
are $95,000.00. When you compare the prices for Zones A -C
and County pick-up, the new year prices reflect a 22% increase
from the 2001 prices of Bid #4015 for limerock and coquina
rock.)
CONTRACTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7.S. Bid #6011 Annual Bid for Shell Material - Dickerson Florida,
Inc.
September 23, 2003
14
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECOINDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Items
ft 1-5 on Bid #6011 to Dickerson Florida, Inc., as the lowest and
most responsive bidder meeting the specifications as set forth
in the Invitation to Bid; authorized establishment of an open-
end contract for the period of October 1, 2003 through
September 30, 2004 with the same vendor; and authorized the
Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for two (2)
additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory
performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best
interest of the County, all as recommended in the memorandum.
(NOTE Last year's expenditures were zero. The project
expenditures for 2004 are $5,000.00. The new year bid prices
reflect a 7.7% increase above the 2001 bid prices.)
CONTRACT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. T. Bid #6009 - Annual Bid for Road Stabilization Material
Dickerson Florida, Inc. and Blackhawk Quarry Company of Florida,
Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
September 23, 2003
15
rse
L 't
#6009 to the lowest and most responsive bidders meeting the
specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid as follows:
Items #1-5 and #9 to Blackhawk Quarry Company of Florida;
Items #7 to Dickerson Florida, Inc.; and Items #6, 8, and 10 to
Dickerson and Blackhawk and authorized establishment of an
open-end contract for the period of October 1, 2003 through
September 30, 2004 with the recommended vendors; and
authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew these contracts for
two (2) additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory
performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best
interest of the County. (NOTE& Last year's expenditures totaled
$90,000.00. The new year prices reflect a 25% increase from
the 2001 prices of Bid #4022 for Road Stabilization Material.
The projected expenditures for 2004 are $90,000 for road
stabilization base and $5,000 for marl, all as recommended in
the memorandum.
CONTRACTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
7. U. Bid #6018 - Annual Bid for General Fill Dirt - Henry Fischer
& Sons, Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
September 23, 2003
16
• •
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#6018 to Henry Fischer & Sons, Inc., as the sole bidder meeting
the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid; authorized
establishment of an open-end contract for the period October 1,
2003 through September 30, 2004, with the same vendor; and
authorized the Purchasing Manager to renew this contract for
two (2) additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory
performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of this annual contract is in the best
interest of the County, all as recommended in the memorandum.
(NOTE Last year's expenditures totaled $700.00. The
projected expenditures for 2004 are $5,000.00.)
7. V. Bid #6010 - Annual Bid for Asphalt Paving and Resurfacing
Community Asphalt Corporation - Dickerson Florida. Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#6010 to the lowest and most responsive bidders meeting the
specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid as follows:
Items #1-12 to Community Asphalt Corporation and Item #13
to multiple vendors: Community Asphalt and Dickerson
Florida, Inc.; and authorized establishment of open-end
contracts for the period of October 1, 2003 through September
September 23, 2003
17
30, 2004 with the recommended vendors; and authorized the
Purchasing Manager to renew these contracts for two (2)
additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory
performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance and the
determination that renewal of these annual contracts is in the
best interest of the County, all as recommended in the
memorandum. (NOTE Last year's expenditures totaled
$447,366. The projected expenditures for 2004 are $650,000.
Cost comparison is not available due to the complete revisions
of the material specifications and pricing structure.)
CONTRACTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2003-033 -
REZONING OF 181.2 ACRES FROM A-1 TO RS -6 - SOUTHEAST
CORDER OF 58TH AVENUE AND 57TH STREET - REQUESTED BY
BAYER CORPORATION - NEWPORT PROPERTIES (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert Keating presented a comprehensive review
of the memorandum utilizing PowerPoint and graphics to enhance his presentation. This
property was formerly a citrus grove and a research facility. He advised of the surrounding
property uses and zoning and this rezoning would fit in with current development in the
area. Staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with the
September 23, 2003
18
• •
surrounding areas, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, meets all concurrency criteria,
will have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning
criteria. The subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for low-density single-
family uses. He noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend
approval of the request. Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance. (Copy of PowerPoint
presentation is on file with the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.)
Chairman Macht inquired as to the rationale used in assigning RS -6 next to
neighboring Bent Pine's zoning of RM -4.
Director Keating explained that Bent Pine was developed under the old zoning and
before the Comprehensive Plan came about; if developed under current regulations Bent
Pine would have to be a planned development (PD)
Commissioner Neuberger inquired as to the capacity of 58th Avenue and whether or
not there is a plan to widen 58th Avenue to the north of SR60 as has been done to the south.
Director Keating recounted that when the MPO did its long-range Transportation
Plan three years ago, Kings Highway was not programmed for expansion. The north -south
plan at that time was to 4 -lane 66th Avenue between SR60 and CR510. The MPO is now
looking at Kings Highway because the programmed development will increase the volume
of traffic. Presently, the concurrency analysis shows there are no problems but the big
project (approximately 1,700 units on 700 acres) to the south of the Bayer property could
significantly change things. That application will probably be submitted in the next few
weeks and the project will be a development of regional impact (DRI)
Vice Chairman Ginn noted the intersection at 58th Avenue and SR 60 will be
adversely impacted by this development, and Director Keating responded that it is now
failing. He added that there have been developer contributions and commitments for
developer contributions to improve that intersection, although there is no time frame for
September 23, 2003
19
those improvements.
Vice Chairman Ginn was not in favor of creating more traffic there.
Chairman Macht was surprised to learn there is no time line for improvements at that
intersection.
Director Keating explained why not and when concern for liability was expressed,
County Attorney Collins explained there is usually no liability because there is a distinction
between planning functions and operational functions.
Vice Chairman Ginn was opposed to conditional concurrency and suggested it is time
to review our Comprehensive Plan because the increase in densities is causing us to have a
change in the quality of life in Indian River County.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing.
Bruce Barkett, Attorney at 756 Beachland Boulevard, appeared on behalf of the
applicant. He introduced other members also present for the applicant. He explained that
the County has sovereign immunity and absolutely no liability for planning level functions.
He reminded the Board they had recently approved a project with the same deficiency and
conditioned it on improvement of the intersection. At this stage his client is only asking for
rezoning. He stressed that concurrency will apply when the project is developed. The fix
for the intersection is in the works.
Chairman Macht asked for clarification as to when the improvements to the
intersection would begin, and Director Keating explained state law and other requirements
allow 2 years from the first certificate of occupancy.
Chairman Macht was concerned that while it may not be a legal obligation to require
the traffic fix before build -out of the development, he felt a moral obligation and could not
September 23, 2003
20
• •
approve this rezoning request due to the gulf between completion of a project which would
severely impact the traffic and the resolution of the problem.
Commissioner Adams thought the Board has approved previous similar projects and
is within the boundaries of the law. She was hearing a broader issue of concern for growth
in Indian River County. She agreed that Comp Plan changes need to be instituted. We
were comfortable with our Comp Plan until people started operating under it, but now we
see the results and we are panicked. She felt it imperative to get something to show us how
the County will look when build -out is completed and this needs to be put on the front
burner.
Director Keating reported he is now in the process of getting fiscal impact model
from the state which will allow staff to determine fiscal impacts and look at graphics.
Chairman Macht suggested they go back to the public hearing.
Commissioner Lowther noted that the Planning & Zoning Commission had the same
problem on this application. We are struggling with our own Plan but this is permissible
according to Policies 1.11 and 1.12.
Commissioner Neuberger asked if the Board could make the Land Use Plan more
restrictive than it is now.
Director Keating recounted that the Plan was adopted in 1990. In 1996 and 1997 an
Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) was done and changes were made in 1998 and
1999. We have to start another EAR in 2 years, and finish it in 3 years. He warned that any
changes to the Plan which reduce densities or take away people's rights may come under the
Bert Harris Act.
County Attorney Collins explained that since 1995 more caution has to be exerted
with respect to changing land development regulations. It has definitely become more
difficult to make changes since that law went into effect. The point the Legislature was
September 23, 2003
21
trying to make under "Bert Harris" was that if you adopt regulations to lower property
values, you have to compensate the property owner.
Vice Chairman Ginn noted that Collier County has adopted an Ag stewardship
program.
Mr. Barkett addressed several questions to Director Keating regarding the goals and
development of the Comp Plan. Director Keating responded. Mr Barkett summarized his
understanding of the Comp Plan which permits approval of this zoning application. He then
introduced Mr. Couzzo.
Don Couzzo, president of Houston Couzzo Group, a land planning and landscape
architecture firm, advised he has 24 years of experience, recently served on the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council, and now serves on the Board of Adjustment. On behalf
of the applicant he supported the rezoning of this property because it will be single-family
next to single-family; he thought it would be good for the neighborhood and compatible
with Bent Pine and would not diminish any surrounding property values. He discussed
compatibility, presented photographic slides of the site, and spoke of the developments on
the surrounding sites.
Joseph Schulke, Schulke, Biddle & Stoddard, Vero Beach, the project engineer,
spoke on density issues and pointed out that density will be limited in a subdivision
development; much of this site will be used for the County's requirements. He displayed
a spread sheet showing recent developments zoned RS -6 and focused on their actual low
densities. He specified that the density of this project likely will be 3.5 units per acre or less.
Commissioner Neuberger inquired about traffic impacts and Mr. Schulke advised that
Mr. Atz would address that aspect.
Chairman Macht pointed out that a developer is not bound to build what is discussed
at this rezoning hearing.
September 23, 2003
22
fl !,
• •
John Atz of Kimley Horn, 601 21' Street, noted that several traffic issues had been
raised and he would try to address them. He understood the Board's difficulty in dealing
with the intricacies of the Code. He pointed out that the Code requires that two traffic
studies be done, one for the maximum development that could occur (6 families per acre)
and then for the development that is proposed. He explained that under the first study, the
development would be of significant impact at SR60 and 58th Avenue Later they will do
another specific study to the actual build -out size At approximately half (using the
projection of 3.5 units per acres), the impact on the same intersection is no longer significant
according to the County's Code. He suggested they keep in mind that the intersection would
not get better if they do not approve this request for rezoning because the intersection will
stay "broken" until the County gets enough money from developers to pay for its
improvement.
Commissioner Neuberger wanted information about the intersection's present
capacity and specifically how many cars go through the intersection southbound.
County Traffic Engineer Christopher Mora PE recalled that the SR60-58th Avenue
intersection currently fails at a level of service (LOS) of "F". That means that it fails
capacity during PM peak hours/peak season. Most of the other hours of the day and year,
it operates within capacity.
Mr. Atz stated that 715 vehicles are southbound on Kings Highway at the peak hour.
Mr. Mora advised that roughly 7,000 vehicles per day would be southbound on Kings
Highway at the intersection.
Lynn Silkworth, 5895 Glen Eagle Drive, president of the Bent Pine Community
Association, reported that Newport Properties has approached the BPCA and shown good
faith and concern. They have offered to limit development to 3.5 homes per acre or a net
of 630 homes on a minimum of 7,000 square foot lots. He believed they are sincere but the
September 23, 2003
23
BPCA wants some guarantee. Because everyone is aware that an initial developer might not
be the final developer, he asked for cooperation from the Commissioners to structure their
approval in such a way to ensure that guarantee.
Gene Winne, 2096 Windward Way, a member of the Planning & Zoning
Commission and speaking on behalf of the Civic Association, supported the last speaker's
comments. He urged that the Board make the proffered development limits a binding
condition on the current developer. He stated that County Attorney Collins told the P & Z
that the Board could approve something "less than" 6 units per acre. He thought it
important.
Donna Keys, 734 S. Fleming Street, Sebastian, a member of the P & Z, advised that
when you read the P & Z minutes, you do not hear the discussion or the arguments of the P
& Z members about this development. She supposed that Mr Barkett is probably one of the
best real estate attorneys she has seen before the P & Z and he comes before them more
frequently because of that reason. His job is to get what his client wants and he is very good
at that. She pointed out that RS -6 is consistent with the Comp Plan, but so is RS -3 and she
asked the Board to approve RS -3. She asked that they look at the common sense of this; if
the Board gives RS -6 they cannot discriminate against future requests by giving less density
in the future in this same area. She had concern that this developer may not be the one to
develop this property.
George Gross, 1230 39th Avenue, also a member of P & Z, opined that the rules are
written and the applicant has complied with those rules. He pointed out that the purpose of
the urban service area is to concentrate development within the USA. If we don't permit
what is on the books, then we will bear the liability for urban sprawl. The same units
prevented will go somewhere else. His reason for voting in favor of this application was
because it met the rules.
September 23, 2003
24
• •
Dr. Richard Baker, 522 N. Blue Island Lane, Sebastian, advised that the Audubon
Society is for controlled growth and specified this is a great opportunity for the Board to
keep this idea going. He believed if this was a PD, it would probably come in at 3 units per
acre. He read an article by Kevin Doty which stated an opinion that Florida is going broke
because the cost of services and demand for infrastructure are not paying for themselves. Dr.
Baker thought approval of RS -6 will set a precedent and urged the Board to rezone the
property RS -3. He speculated on the challenges engineers will face in widening 58th
Avenue.
Commissioner Adams asked what the actual build -out would be if the Board were to
rezone the property RS -3, and Director Keating responded that it would depend on the
design a standard subdivision would yield about 2.5 or 2.4 units per acre and if they wanted
a PD, the developer would have to come back to the Board for a public hearing.
Commissioner Adams also asked if there were a way to put a caveat that this rezoning
is only for this property owner, and County Attorney Collins responded that zoning runs
with the land; the property owner is irrelevant.
In response to further questioning by Commissioner Adams, Director Keating
explained that 3.5 units per acre is probably close to the upper limit the property will yield.
Fred Mensing, 7580 129th Street, Sebastian, could not help to solve the Board's
dilemma today. He mentioned that in the state of Delaware, the state is buying up Ag rights.
He suggested that, instead of buying up conservation land, the County ought to start looking
at buying some of the tracts to keep as agriculture and control density.
Mr. Barkett thought this has been caught up in a larger debate than the application
involves. He commented that when people come to this County, work with staff within the
Plan, and receive staff's support, that the Commissioners should support those applications.
September 23, 2003
25
He specified that this application is within the Comp Plan and it disturbed him that the
Board seemed to be abandoning the Comp Plan and their staff because of a deficient
intersection. He stated that he had elicited commitments from many of them that if he works
within the Plan, he had done his part. In conclusion, he asked for their support for a myriad
of reasons.
Chairman Macht was not irritated at Mr. Barkett's applicant; he seemed to be very
forthcoming and considerate of his neighbor. He commented that our worst traffic situation
is trivial compared to those in metropolitan areas. He was irritated that the Commission
allowed itself to get behind the 8 -ball when it should have revised the Comp Plan long ago.
His concern was that another developer might not be so considerate.
Mark Kerslake, 1601 Dove Street, Newport Beach, CA, stated he is a principal with
the applicant. He felt they had a good meeting with Bent Pine. The intersection is deficient
today and he cannot do anything about it unless they have a project. When he spoke with
Chris Mora, his preliminary cost (impact fee) would be about $250,000 for this project. One
way to get the intersection fixed is to approve his project in order to collect their fair -share
payment. They are ready, willing, and able to contribute toward a SR 60 -58th Avenue
intersection improvement. He pointed out that the property is within the urban service area
and asked the Board to honor that. At the recent meeting with the Bent Pine homeowners,
he offered to record a deed restriction of not more than 3.5 units per acre and will do that.
He has tried to be sensitive and to work with neighbors and asked for approval of the
application.
Renee Renzi, 340A E. Waverly Place, Vero Beach, referring back to Mr. Barkett's
remark about eliciting commitments, thought she heard a violation of the Sunshine Law.
Several Commissioners stated that Mr. Barkett had not met with them individually.
Mr. Barkett clarified his remarks and Commissioner Adams specified that he had not
September 23, 2003
26
} r k.
.f %j
• •
spoken with them about this application but about growth issues in general.
Mr. Kerslake advised several of Bent Pine residents offered their support and he
presented 8 letters indicating that support. (Placed on file with the backup in the Office of
the Clerk to the Board.)
Gordon Mann, a resident of Bent Pine for 15 years, current President of the
Condominium Association, supported the application. He stated that the general consensus
is that this is the best looking application and the best property around us. It should enhance
the Bent Pine area because they are talking about a gated -community; they have a lot of
appeal; and he thought they were quite sincere. The covenant (deed restriction) Mr. Kerslake
offered was the "closer" because it assured them that development of the property would
be bound by it and limited to 3.5 units per acre. He wanted the applicant to have the
opportunity to build a community there.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lowther,
SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, to approve staff's
recommendations.
Under discussion, both Commissioner Lowther and Commissioner Adams supported
the motion because this complies with what is in the Comp Plan. Commissioner Lowther
believed Mr. Gross' comments were right on target.
Commissioner Adams thought the Commissioners are now having "cold feet" but
she felt the Comp Plan dust needs to be tweaked. The applicant's promise to develop only
3.5 units/per acre was a good thing. She would love to see it as a PD.
September 23, 2003
27
Chairman Macht thought it would come in as a PD
Vice Chairman Ginn could not support this based on LOS at 58' Avenue and SR 60.
She did not believe in "conditional currency" as it will impact traffic too greatly. She could
agree with rezoning it RS -3 but not RS -6.
Commissioner Neuberger thought agreement with Bent Pine satisfied the density
issue. The traffic intensity at 58th Avenue - SR 60 already exists and is not their fault and
not a reason to deny the request. If blame were to be leveled, it would be for the traffic
coming from south county.
Commissioner Lowther called the question.
Vice Chairman Ginn argued that we already have a deficient intersection with a LOS
of 7 and she could not see adding to it. Now we will have other properties saying "me, too".
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 3-2 (Vice Chairman Ginn & Chairman Macht opposed).
(Ordinance No. 2003-033 adopted amending the Zoning
Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for
approximately 181.2 acres located at the southeast corner of 58'
Avenue and 57" Street, from A-1, Agricultural District (up to
1 unit/5 acres) to RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up
to 6 units/acre); and providing codification, severability, and
effective date.
(CLERK'S NOTE* At this time, Chairman Macht asked Community Development Director
Robert Keating if the next item would take long and Director Keating replied it would not.
September 23, 2003
28
• •
Then Chairman Macht asked the Commissioners' approval of taking agenda Item 11.C.1.
after 9.A.2. because one of the Commissioners had to be out of the meeting by noon. There
was unanimous agreement to making the requested change.)
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2003-121 -
ABANDONMENT OF THE PORTION OF ORANGE STREET
LOCATED BETWEEN CR 510 AND 46TH AVENUE REQUESTED BY
ELSON SMITH (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the memorandum using aerial photographs
and other graphics to aid in the location of the road in question. He specified this is actually
a "paper street" through unimproved property and is not on any maps. He pointed out that
this "paper street" was established only on the Weona Park plat and thus if it is abandoned
it would only go to the property to the north and not to the property to the south. He noted
that surrounding property owners were notified and there had been contact with
correspondence in the backup that the property owner to the south wished for this to be split
in half. Staff's recommendation was to approve the request and abandon it.
Director Boling clarified State law for Commissioner Neuberger. He explained how
other abandonments in the area were handled. Staff concluded that the logic used in those
abandonments had no bearing on this request for abandonment as to any precedent having
been set. This one should be handled according to State law.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
September 23, 2003
29
Bill North, 3012 Nassau Drive, Vero Beach. owns the property on the north of this
"street" and he has not been able to come to the same conclusion as staff. He read from
prepared notes which argued at length against the County's position. He had notified staff
that he would oppose the abandonment unless the property is split, half to the south and half
to the north. It did not seem logical and did not seem fair that the property should go to
Weona Park. He asked that if the Board decides to abandon Orange Street that it be split
because precedent was already set.
Commissioner Adams inquired if an easement would be retained by the County, and
Community Development Director Robert Keating responded in the affirmative.
Commissioner Neuberger's experience has been that abandonments are split between
the two abutting property owners. If the Board could not do that here, then the abandonment
should not be done.
Darrell Fennell, attorney at 979 Beachland Boulevard, representing Mr. Smith,
suggested that since there is no road there and there is no public need or reason to have a
road there, abandonment seemed appropriate. He believed that is not at issue. He thought
the next thing to do is abandon the road and let the chips fall as they may because the law
is going to apply. He took the position that the County had no role other than to abandon
it. He thought the law would support that this 25 feet was diminished from Weona Park and
that no part of it served to diminish the dimensions of Wabasso Court and Orange Street
would have no effect on Wabasso Court if it were to be given to thein. He was happy to
have it abandoned and then if Mr. Miller, the owner of the property to the south, feels that
he should share it, we will have our day in court and the court will decide who would get it,
not the Board. He felt that County Attorney Collins would confirm his statement. He did
not know how the other abandonments were split nor the reasoning used. He suggested the
September 23, 2003
30
• •
Board need take no position in saying who should have it.
County Attorney Collins advised that the County never used to say how these were
to be done, but the Property Appraiser in more recent years would ask how to divvy up the
property and, therefore, we have been more explicit in the resolution of abandonments, that
the property shall accrue to one or the other. He noted the Statutes (in the backup) shown
on pages 324 and 325 which speak of two different situations. He read, explained his
reasoning, and concluded that it made sense that the property owner that conveyed the
easement should get the easement being released. The property to the south (Wabasso Park)
contributed nothing to this road and it made no sense that they would reap a windfall from
something that they did not contribution to in the first place.
Commissioner Adams understood that if a road were to be made, the property owner
to the south would contribute 25' and then if it were later abandoned, the abutting property
owners (north and south) would each get half.
County Attorney Collins agreed.
Mr. Fennell concurred and pointed out that there is no question that the property
came from Weona Park. Mr. Miller has his full lot of 165' in his subdivision, none has been
taken from him. It would not be appropriate to split this; his position is supported by
common law and case decisions he has found. In response to Commissioner Adams, Mr.
Fennell confiuined that this property is being sought to enlarge Mr. Smith's property which
is being sold for development purposes and there is no reason for it to be utilized for a road.
Drainage easements will be retained by the County.
Discussion ensued.
Commissioner Neuberger commented this plat was 75 years and he argued his point
that it was fair to divide it.
September 23, 2003
31
County Attorney Collins explained that where Commissioner Neuberger was reading
was concerning the County taking title from abutting property owners. In this case, we do
not have the fee title to the property and, therefore, we read the clause before that where we
simply hold an easement and the title of the fee owners is freed and released from that
easement that we hold. The underlying fee owner is the original dedicator or their heirs,
successors, or assigns, which would be Mr. Smith.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
pubhc hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Ginn, the Board by a 3-2 vote (Commissioners
Lowther and Neuberger opposed) adopted Resolution No.
2003-121 providing for the closing, abandonment, vacation,
and discontinuance of that portion of Orange Street that lies
between County Road 510 on the west and 46th Avenue on the
east in the Wabasso area of Indian River County, Florida.
(CLERK'S NOTE• Chairman Macht called a short recess at 11:36 a.m. There was previous
CONSENSUS that the next item would be 11.C.1. Meeting was reconvened at 11:46 a.m.
with all members except Commissioner Adams who was temporarily absent. The next Item
heard was 11.C.1. but these minutes follow the agenda order for continuity purposes.)
September 23, 2003
32
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM FRED
MENSING TO DISCUSS PROPOSAL TO SETTLE SUIT AND GAIN
ACCESS TO KIRRIE INDUSTRIAL SITE
County Attorney Collins advised 1) that Mr. Mensing left the meeting, but asked that
the Board be updated on the status of their negotiations; 2) the County's attorney. Alan
Polackwich, called to advise that the Court has ordered mediation so he has requested an
attorney-client session with the Commissioners; and 3) Mr. Mensing gave Mr. Collins a
marked up copy on the previously proposed settlement. Details as to time and place of that
meeting will be forthcoming. (CLERK'S NOTE Attorney-client session was scheduled
for October 7, 2003, at 10:45 a.m. in the Administrator's Conference Room.)
9.C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR
OCTOBER 7, 2003
1. Kingslake Subdivision Petition Water Service Resolution
III
2. Michael Baratta's Request to Rezone 36.6 Acres from A-1
toRM-6
Executive Aide Kimberly Massung read the above notices into the record.
September 23, 2003
33
•
10.A. MESA PARK AUCTION - AUTHORIZATION TO BID ON
EQUIPMENT AND STRUCTURES
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Neuberger, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to bid on equipment and structures at MESA Park and to
issue a letter of intent with the Chairman's signature not -to -
exceed $50,000 in total, as recommended in the memorandum.
A COPY OF THE LEITER OF INTENT
HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE BACKUP
10.B. RETIREES HEALTH INSURANCE
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Neuberger,
SECONDED by Commissioner Lowther, to approve staff s
recommendation.
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams questioned the minimum of 8 years
employment which seemed to her to be too short. She would prefer 10 or 12 years of
employment.
Assistant Administrator Joseph Baird advised staff would not have a problem.
Initially it had been 10 years.
Chairman Macht noted that a lot of employees in the general sector are having trouble
with paying insurance between retirement and age 65 when Medicare is available.
Vice Chairman Ginn advised that she would have to dissent; prescription drug
coverage may be coming from the Federal government for those over 65. Some pension
September 23, 2003
34
• •
plans may offer other possibilities, but she was looking at the total dollars. Some people,
such as firemen, can retire and get a second job. She wondered why we would carry their
insurance while they are on a second job.
Assistant Administrator Baird stated that firemen and other special risk employees
can retire after 25 years at 55 or 57. He noted that we do not subsidize employees unless
they work for Indian River County for a minimum of 8 years and Commissioner Adams
wants 10 years. In order to be eligible they must retire under the definition in our handbook.
There is no way of controlling the future work habits of anyone. After 25 years of service,
we are trying to be fair. A problem we are facing is that lower -paid employees either cannot
afford insurance or their whole pension is going to insurance and some cannot afford to
retire because of the costs of health insurance. This was brought forward at the Board's
request.
Assistant Administrator Baird responded to further questions of Vice Chairman Ginn
who felt that the Board needed to know more of the financial implications of this.
Commissioner Neuberger asked if Vice Chairman Ginn thought there should be a
"floor" on the age, for example from 62 to 65 because generally those who retire earlier
would be employed elsewhere. This was his reasoning when he asked this be brought back
to the Board (at the September 16th meeting).
Chairman Macht thought Commissioner Neuberger's suggestion would be fair to the
public and the retiree.
Assistant Administrator Baird believed the majority of those who retire are over 55.
We only have 18 who have single coverage who are under 65 and 18 who have dependent
coverage under 65 at this time. One of the problems at this time, under our rules, is that
when you retire from the County, you must make the choice at the time of retirement
whether you want to take the County's health insurance. They cannot come back later and
September 23, 2003
35
say they want to be on the County's health insurance. They cannot change their mind.
Vice Chairman Ginn understood that an employee could retire at 55, receive their
pension and $5 per month per year of service from the State to help with their insurance
costs.
Assistant Administrator Baird pointed out that a retired employee from Road and
Bridge could not afford to buy the health insurance. He felt if there was to be a floor age
that it should be at 55. He stated that he had put all the information in his memorandum.
Discussion ensued.
Commissioner Neuberger offered an AMENDMENT TO HIS
MOTION to require 10 years of Service, with a floor of age 60
to participate in this program, and Commissioner Lowther
reluctantly SECONDED the AMENDMENT.*
Under discussion, Chairman Macht thought that was workable.
Commissioner Lowther commented that all he had heard was "firefighter, firefighter"
and addressed a question to a Sheriff's deputy in the audience, who responded that he was
planning to retire next year after 30 years of service at age 57. Whereupon Commissioner
Lowther *WITHDREW HIS SECOND TO THE AMENDMENT.
County Attorney Collins specified that special -risk employees can retire at age 55,
or after 25 years of service regardless of age, or at age 52 with 25 years of service.
Chairman Macht suggested this matter be tabled for a few weeks in order to study the
full scope of this and all the various employees that are affected.
September 23, 2003
36
• •
Commissioner Lowther suggested Assistant Administrator Baird come back with
numbers on the Road and Bridge employees. He agreed with Chairman Macht that they
needed more information and more study.
Vice Chairman Ginn thought this is going to be tricky and questioned that the
employee had to decide immediately about the health insurance coverage when they retire.
Assistant Administrator Baird confirmed that it has always been that way because the
employee could go to work elsewhere where insurance is offered and leave that job and want
to come back and ask to get on our plan. The retiring employee must make that decision to
limit the County's exposure. They cannot come back and get on the County's plan. That
was why he suggested age 55.
Administrator Chandler pointed out that staff is trying not to discriminate against any
employee. We were trying to eliminate age discrimination.
Further discussion ensued and Assistant Administrator Baird reiterated the current
requirements and pointed out there is a cost for subsidizing those over 65 and there will be
additional cost if the Board decides to subsidize any age under 65.
Commissioner Adams believed the Board was trying to subsidize but not to
jeopardize.
MOTION by Commissioner Lowther to subsidize health insurance for employees
who work 10 years DIED for lack of a second. (No age floor)
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Ginn; to table this matter until
at least October 14, 2003.
Assistant Administrator Baird pointed out that the reason this came to the Board at
September 23, 2003
37
this time was because there will be a big Increase for retirees in the cost of their health
insurance as of October 1, 2003.
Commissioner Neuberger suggested that if they decide after that date to give the
subsidy, they can make it retroactive.
11.B.1.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Lowther opposed). (Tabled to
October 14, 2003)
RENEWAL OF 800 MHz COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH
COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Lowther, the Board unanimously approved the
contract with Communications International, Inc., with funding
provided from the Communications-1±mergency Services
budget, in the amount of $159,601.82 (513,300.15 per month),
as recommended in the memorandum.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT & LIST OF MAINTENANCE COSTS IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.C.1. NEW COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX - DONADIO
& ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, P.A./SONG & ASSOCIATES, INC. -
PRESENTATION OF PHASE I, PROGRAMMING AND PROGRAM
VALIDATION REPORT, ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT
FOR DESIGN
September 23, 2003
38
• •
(CLERK'S NOTF• The presentation notebook entitled Indian River County
Administration Complex Programming Document Final Document September
16, 2003, an important part of this presentation, is on file with the backup for
this meeting.)
Chairman Macht announced that this item was moved forward to be heard directly
after the public hearings because of time constraints. (CLERK' S OTE • The Chairman
reconvened the meeting at 11:46 a.m. following Item 9.A.2. with all members present except
Commissioner Adams. Commissioner Adams was not present during this presentation and
discussion but returned just as the Board voted.)
General Services Director Tom Frame gave a brief review of how we got here as a
result of the Space Needs Committee's research and recommendation. We now have verbal
agreements with the City to obtain the needed property with two Attorneys working out the
contract details. After the presentation, the Board will be asked to authorize the architect
to proceed with the remaining portion of the contract, the design and construction. He asked
Steve Blum to come forward to introduce the architectural team to make their presentation
of the work thus far accomplished.
New Administration Building Project Manager Steve Blum noted that the last several
months have been a very interesting process. They have validated the findings of the Space
Needs Committee; have gotten to know the department heads have interviewed, interviewed
again, and reviewed and reviewed again. We think we now have a validated program about
which we can be proud. This is the most important phase of the project and we look forward
to the rest of the project and giving the County a very fine building. He introduced Tony
Donadio, the prime architect, and Young Song, the associate architect whose film has taken
the lead on this portion of the work and who will make the presentation.
September 23, 2003
39
Young Song expressed her sincere appreciation for this opportunity. She introduced
her staff and gave a Power Point presentation and used other visuals to enhance her
presentation. She asked the members of the Space Needs Committee to stand up and she
noted that they are owed a lot for their contribution of time, energy and knowledge to this
effort. She has used the Committee's data and information and built on it. She specified
that the cooperation of staff has been incredible in the many meetings with them Because
technology is changing very rapidly, space needs have been coordinated with paper
management and work space. They have developed, among other details, standards for
space, flow charts, square foot area projections by department, support spaces such as
conference rooms which can also be used for training. Thirteen departments of the 14 were
included in the original space needs study and the 14th department, Recreation, was added
in their recent study Each department received questionnaires which were used in the
analysis prior to meetings with that department. Many department representatives showed
up with additional information and even layouts to make their jobs more efficient. The
support and help from the County's staff was incredible. Discussions at the meetings with
staff included sizes ofprivate offices and semi -private offices, work stations, work surfaces,
lobby spaces, details of how spaces were really used and anticipation of possible future
technologies. With regard to future technologies, she wished she had a crystal ball because
they are changing so fast As an example, she displayed the working documents, charts, and
future anticipated requirements (out to 2025) for the Board of County Commissioners'
offices. She reviewed information for overall numbers and spaces and explained the logic
used in future space requirements. The next step is the schematic design when they can
really work with staff to shape the spaces within the building and make changes that may
be necessary.
September 23, 2003
40
• •
Frank Coffey, 1200 Admirals Walk, was on the Space \eeds Committee for 18
months. He strongly endorsed the continuation of this project. He has reviewed the
Programming Document and found it to be an excellent report. There were a couple of
issues, but he did not mean to be critical of the Song report. He reviewed the charts he had
put together; the first was a summary chart which gave the square footage per employee
under the various studies put together. He noted that the numbers used by the Space Needs
Committee are almost identical in total square footage to those developed by Song &
Associates. On a second chart, entitled Staff Employees (per department) for County
Administration Building, he focused on the last two columns and noted that there was a
large increase in the number of employees in Community Development. He understood
some of that increase because of the large building growth we have experienced, but he
questioned that this may be dust a current spike which may not continue through to that time
(2015). Once again, the total numbers are very close. Then on page 3 of his handout,
focusing on the Community Development and Planning Division, again their figures are
close. He urged the Board to continue to work and move forward as quickly as possible.
(A copy of the charts used by Mr. Coffey has been placed with the backup for the meeting
in the office of the Clerk to the Board.)
Ital Veron, 280 Peppertree Drive, Indian River Shores, was also a member of the
SNC. He thought there were two significant things: first, this projection by Song &
Associates has about a 1% variance with what the SNC came up with if you add in the
Recreation Department of 3100 square feet, which we did not have at the time. He also
mentioned that almost 4 years ago, July 6, 1999, he came before the Board on behalf of the
Taxpayers Association to voice disapproval of the work on previous programming and asked
them to stop all work. It was after that the SNC was formed and most recently this
document was presented. He has reviewed the document and it is a long step forward to
September 23, 2003
41
form the foundation needed to continue the design and he urged the Commission to allow
it to happen.
Vice Chairman Ginn had some questions on the schematic design, and Ms. Song
specified that they will be able to allocate space layout differently. She was concerned about
the County's Constitutional Officers and Community Development which jumped from 59
to 81. The Clerk of Court changed from 39 to 35. The Supervisor of Elections remained
even. She spoke with the Tax Collector and he cannot envision less than 39 people out 20
years. She thought it would be wise to meet with the Constitutional Officers since no one
had met with them after these were done.
Steve Blum advised that after the initial discussions around July 15', Song &
Associates gave him copies of the result sheets as tabulated and he personally delivered them
to each of the Constitutional Officers and also to each division for verification. Some came
back with changes and others did not. This report reflects those numbers. With respect to
the Constitutional Officers, there were no changes and they have had a part in this process.
Administrator Chandler advised that he had met with his departments, primarily
Emergency Management, Public Works, and Community Development. There were some
changes in the figures from the ones presented to him earlier. The numbers were down.
Vice Chairman Ginn thought it was a great report and thought we should go forward.
Clerk of Court Jeffrey K. Barton stated that they provided his office with a copy of
their work product, asked him to review it and he did. In some circumstances he advised
them they could cut back and they followed through. From his standpoint, this reflected
what they finally agreed on and he also wanted to see this project keep going.
Chairman Macht wondered about the Clerk's office and understood most of his
employees would remain in the Courthouse.
Clerk Barton responded that about one-third of his employees are in the
September 23, 2003
42
• •
Administration Building. From the very beginning, arrangements were made for his
administrative office to be moved to the Administration Building because his office in the
Courthouse is scheduled to be a future courtroom and there will be no other place in the
Courthouse for his office. He and his Chief Deputy/Human Resources Department will
move to the Administration Building when they have to vacate the Courthouse. That was
included and added to the number of employees that will be in the new building.
Vice Chairman Ginn asked Ms. Song how Community Development got up to 81
employees.
Ms. Song responded that is one of the departments that is difficult to predict. That
was our best -guess -estimation after working with them. As she mentioned earlier, this is a
guideline and when they sit down on the schematic design, it will have flexibility as it is
being designed and they will meet again with them, present their design, and talk about it.
Chairman Macht noted that the complexity of their work will be changing and that
has already started to happen with redevelopment of old properties and environmental
issues. It is not just new development that will drive the expansion of the department.
Administrator Chandler estimated there were 20 positions eliminated since the July
figures came out. There was a lot of staff discussion on that.
Vice Chairman Ginn thought we absolutely must avoid building too small, but we
will leave that to the consultants' expertise.
Jim Granse, 36 Pine Arbor Lane, offered Just a "curbside opinion". He misses few
meetings and is in the building often; he thought the building of this new building should
be expedited.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED by
Commissioner Neuberger, the Board unanimously accepted the
September 23, 2003
43
report and authorized that the project be moved forward with all
due haste. (CLERK'S NOTE The vote on this was first
recorded as 4-0 with Commissioner Adams absent, but she
returned at 12:26 p.m., just as the Chairman was ready to
announce the next item. She agreed to add her vote in favor in
order to make the approval unanimous )
Chairman Macht complimented Vice Chairman Ginn for chairing the Space Needs
Committee and bringing it to this point.
(CLERK'S NOTE• A copy of the official notice letter written to Mr. Donadio
to proceed is on file with the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.)
11.0.2. EASEMENT -BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- LOT 9, BLOCK 3, VALENCIA PARK SUBDIVISION - NORTHEAST
CORNER OF 43RD AVENUE AND 14TH PLACE - SOLICITATION OF
BIDS AUTHORIZED
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Neuberger, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to solicit sealed bids for the easement by proper
advertisement with a minimum bid of $2,000. Should
BellSouth be the successful bidder at $2,000 or more, the
Chairman shall be authorized to execute the easement
documents at the successful bid amount, as recommended in the
memorandum.
September 23, 2003
44
• •
COPY OF EASEMENT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.C.3. OLD FELLSMERE SCHOOL - INFRASTRUCTURE
CONTRACTS - STANDARD BID REQUIREMENTS WAIVED - BIP
DiPIETRO ELECTRIC, INC. - BOBBY'S PLUMBING, INC. - CARE -
FULL AIR CONDITIONING, INC.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Neuberger, the Board unanimously waived the
standard bid requirements for the plumbing, electrical and air-
conditioning requirements and accepted proposals from
Bobby's Plumbing in a not -to -exceed total of 513,900, Bip
DiPietro Electric in a not -to -exceed total of $38,435, and Care -
Full Air Conditioning in a not -to -exceed total of $65,000, for
infrastructure work to be done at Old Fellsmere School.
Payment and performance bonds are to be waived subject to no
payment being made until all work is satisfactorily performed,
and evidence is submitted that all bills for materials and labor
have been paid in full. Above proposals shall be incorporated
into the standard agreement and the Chairman is authorized to
execute said agreements when required certificates of insurance
have been submitted and the County Attorney has approved the
agreements as to form and legal sufficiency, all as
recommended in the memorandum.
September 23, 2003
45
b'.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.1.1. EAST ROSELAND STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT - WORK ORDER #10 - CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED BY
Vice Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Work
Order #10 with Carter Associates, Inc., and authorized the
Chairman to execute same, as recommended in the
memorandum.
WORK ORDER #10 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.I.2. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES AGREEMENTS
FOR ANNUAL SURVEYING AND MAPPING SERVICES - BURDETTE
& ASSOCIATES, INC., CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., CREECH
ENGINEERING, INC., KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
MASTELLER, MOLER & REED, INC., AND MORGAN EKLUND, INC.
(2003-2004 - IRC PROJECT NO. 3090
ON MOTION by Vice Charman Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Neuberger, the Board unanimously approved the
fee schedules and agreements with the following six surveyors:
Burdette & Associates, Inc., Carter Associates, Inc., Creech
Engineering, Inc., Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc., Masteller,
Moler & Reed, Inc., and Morgan Eklund, Inc., and authorized
the Chairman to execute same, as recommended in the
memorandum.
September 23, 2003
46
•
CONTRACTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN GINN - DIRECTIONS TO COUNTY
ATTOR\EY REGARDING AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PUBLIC
NUDITY
Vice Chairman Ginn noted that all the Commissioners received as additional backup
a publication from the American Family Association concerning St. Johns County's public
nudity ordinance, which has been found to be constitutional by the United States Supreme
Court. (Copy placed on file with the backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.)
Although we do have an ordinance that goes into states of undress in establishments serving
alcoholic beverages, she thought it did not go far enough to protect Indian River County,
as a family oriented community. She urged adoption of a similar ordinance for our county.
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Ginn, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, to look at St. Johns County's
ordinance as a model for adoption in Indian River County,
particularly because it has already withstood the Supreme Court
review.
Under discussion, County Attorney Collins pointed out that we currently have two
ordinances that address this issue and the area for opportunity for adult entertainment in our
county is restricted by our Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to a very limited area
which would not be a viable location for the operator of such an establishment.
County Attorney Collins responded to questions of the Commissioners concerning
September 23, 2003
47
L.
y
,�3
our law and explained that there is already a state law twice as stringent as anything we
could pass He had looked at St. Johns County's ordinance and in his opinion it gives less
power than we already have. He believed we should not diminish what we already have and
`create a solution in search of a problem".
Chairman Macht recalled that when he was on the City of Vero Beach Council, they
wanted to exclude nudity completely but their attorney's recommendation was to allow it in
a zone where it was untenable. He believed that our attorney has given us advice and the
Board should abide by it.
Vice Chairman Ginn was still not convinced and wanted it on the books.
County Attorney Collins commented that while St. Johns has successfully defended
it, he was reluctant to spend staff time on research and not get anything better than what we
already have.
Discussion ensued and County Attorney Collins continued to defend our ordinance.
Commissioner Adams WITHDREW HER SECOND, there was not another, and the
Chairman called the MOTION DEAD
There was no further discussion.
September 23, 2003
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District. Those
Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
ALL BACKUP DOCUMEN FATION, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
AND ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF {HESE MINUTES
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 1:08 p.m.
ATTEST
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk w Kenneth R. Macht, Chairman
NOV -- 4 2003
Minutes approved
September 23, 2003