HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/3/2002Yr
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman
John W. Tippin, Vice Chairman
Fran B. Adams
Caroline D. Ginn
Kenneth R. Macht
District 2
District 4
District 1
District 5
District 3
James E Chandler, County Administrator
Paul G. Bangel, County Attorney
Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to BCC
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /
EMERGENCY ITEMS
ADDITIONAL BACKUP: Items 9.A.2., 9.A.4., 9.A.5.. 11.C.3, & New Page 164
MOVE: Item 8.B. TO 9.B.2.
5. PROCLAMATION and PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Month of
September, 2002 as Leukemia & Lymphoma Awareness
Month
BACKUP
PAGES
1
B. Presentation of Proclamation Designating September 8-
14, 2002, as American Character Week 2
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of July 23, 2002
B. Regular Meeting of August 6, 2002
C. Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002
1
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Received and placed on file in office of Clerk to the Board:
Vero Lakes Water Control District Notice of Meeting on
9/16/02 at 9:00 a.m. at 3333 20th Street, Vero Beach, FL
to elect 2 supervisors, receive reports of the engineer and
other officials, and transact other business
BACKUP
PAGES
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated August 15, 2002) 3-14
Approval of Warrants
(memorandum dated August 22, 2002) 15-27
Appointment of Member at Large to the Historic Resources
Advisory Committee (HRAC)
(memorandum dated September 3, 2002)
Certification of tax roll without conclusion of VAB hearings
(memorandum dated August 21, 2002) 29-31
McCain & Associates, Inc.'s Request for Extension of Site
Plan Approval for Commercial Plaza Known as Sciara
Commercial Development
(memorandum dated August 19, 2002)
Consideration of Indian River County 2002 SHIP Program
Annual Reports
(memorandum dated August 14, 2002)
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
(memorandum dated August 16, 2002) 78-79
Independent Audit Contract with Harris, Cotherman &
Associates — Contract Amendment
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002)
Minor Revisions to Previously Approved Joint Participa-
tion Agreement (JPA) with the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) for: Traffic Signal Maintenance
and Compensation
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002)
FORMUNIS Software Agreement
(memorandum dated August 28, 2002) 97-130
CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.):
L City of Vero Beach Terminating 16th St. Ball Field Lease
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGES
131-139
Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 017
(memorandum dated August 23, 2002) 140 145
HUD Contract for Grant Award FL 29B 109003
(memorandum dated August 28, 2002) 146-185
HUD Contract for Grant Award FL 29B109002
(memorandum dated August 28, 2002) 186-223
Indian River County Bid #4069 Mobile Lift Station
(memorandum dated August 15, 2002) 224-238
Indian River County Bid #4077 Sodium Hypochlorite
Metering Pump
(memorandum dated August 15, 2002)
239-254
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
A. Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk of Circuit Court:
Investment Report
(memorandum dated August 28, 2002)
255-264
Jim Egan, Marine Resources Council:
Request to Discuss Issues as Outlined in Backup 265-266
PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Reconsideration of Graves Brothers Inc s Request
to Abandon a Portion of Old Dixie Located North
of C.R.510 and South of U.S.1 (Legislative)
(memorandum dated August 22, 2002)
Board Consideration of Proposed Contract Offer
to Lost Tree Village Corporation and Draft Inter-
local Agreement for Purchase of the Lost Tree
Islands
(memorandum dated August 26, 2002)
267-300
301-325
9. PUBLIC ITEMS (cont'd.):
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd.):
3.
Hibiscus Children's Center, Inc.'s Request for
Special Exception Use Approval for a Group Home
Facility (Quasi -Judicial)
(memorandum dated August 22, 2002)
4. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE
ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 16.85 ACRES
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF INDIAN RIVER
BOULEVARD AND APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET NORTH
OF 41st STREET FROM RM -6, MULTIPLE—FAMILY RESI—
DENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) AND RS -6,
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE), TO RM -8, MULTIPLE—FAMILY RESIDEN—
TIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8 UNIT/ACRE); AND PROVIDING
CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE
The Bobo family s request to rezone 16.85 acres from
RS -6 and RM -6 to RM -8
(memorandum dated August 19, 2002)
5. Paving and Drainage Improvements to 34th Avenue SW,
35th Avenue SW between 13th Street SW and 9th Street
SW (Oslo Road) in Grovenor Estates Subdivision
(memorandum dated August 20, 2002)
6. Consideration of an Application for a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity for a Class El
Certificate for The Place at Vero Beach
(memorandum dated August 9, 2002)
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Request from Brian T. Heady to Speak
(letter dated August, 2002)
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Update on Delaying Traffic Impact Fee Payments Until Certifi-
cate of Occupancy (C.O.) for Non -Residential Projects
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Community Development
None
BACKUP
PAGES
326-337
338-353
354-398
399-409
410
411-413
4
w
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
B. Emergency Services
1. Approval of Resolution Re -authorizing
Imposition of E911 Fee
(memorandum dated August 16, 2002)
BACKUP
PAGES
414-418
Approval of State & Federally Funded Subgrant
Agreement
(memorandum dated August 20, 2002)
419-461
General Services
1. Request to use three written quotes in lieu of sealed
bids for the purchase of stainless steel toilets and
lavatories for the county jail
(memorandum dated August 26, 2002)
Final Payment and Release of Retainage — Chilberg
Construction Co., Inc., North County Library
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002)
Final Payment and Release of Retainage — Bill
Bryant & Associates, Main Library
(memorandum dated August 26, 2002)
Leisure Services
None
462-469
470-478
479-524
Office of Management and Budget
None
Human Resources
None
Public Works
1. West Wabasso Park Improvements — Phase 2
Resolution for FRDAP Funds
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002)
Developer's Agreement for Improvements to
13th Street SW — Ansley Park Development
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002)
525-526
527-534
Developer's Agreement — Humane Society of
Vero Beach and Indian River County
(memorandum dated August 26, 2002)
535-547
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
H. Utilities
1. Developer's Agreement with Inlet at Sebastian, LLC
(for water main installation on U.S.#1), Roseland
Road and Old Dixie Highway)
(memorandum dated August 1, 2002)
Work Authorizations to Camp Dresser & McKee,
Inc. and Masteller, Moler & Reed, Inc. to Implement
Various Phases of the Resolution Agreement bet-
ween the Florida Department of Environmental Pro-
tection (FDEP) and Indian River County for the
North Reverse Osmosis Water Plant
(memorandum dated August 14, 2002)
Human Services
None
BACKUP
PAGES
548-560
561-576
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Updates
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
BACKUP
PAGES
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS/BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes — meeting of Aug. 20, 2002
SWDD Franchise Agreements
(memorandum dated August 27, 2002) 577-676
Environmental Control Board
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal will be based.
Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at 567-8000 x1223 at least 48 hours in advance of
meeting.
Indian River County WebSite: http://www.ircgov.com
Full agenda back-up material is available for review in the Board of County Commission Office,
Indian River County Main Library, IRC Courthouse Law Library, and North County Library
Meeting may be broadcast live on AT & T Cable Channel 13 — rebroadcast continuously Thursday 1:00
p.m. until Friday morning and Saturday 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m.
Meeting broadcast same as above on AT & T Broadband, Channel 27 in Sebastian.
INDEX TO MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS 1
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 2
5.A. LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA AWARENESS MONTH - SEPTEMBER 2002
1
1
2
5 B AMERICAN CHARACTER WEEK - SEPTEMBER 8-14, 2002 4
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 23, 2002 5
6 B APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 6, 2002 5
6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 2002 6
7. CONSENT AGENDA 6
7.A. Reports 6
7 B Approval of Warrants 6
7.C. Approval of Warrants 15
7 D Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC) - Appointment of
Kathleen Coley to Fill Seat Vacated by Arline Westfahl 26
7 E Certification of the Tax Roll Prior to Conclusion of VAB Hearings 26
7.F. Extension of Site Plan Approval for Commercial Plaza Known as Sciara
Commercial Development Requested by McCain & Associates, Inc. 27
1
13 V
Li
PG t
0
at
7.G. Approval of Annual 2002 SHIP (State Housing Initiatives Partnership)
Program Reports 29
7.H. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs 32
7.1. Harris, Cotherman & Associates, Amendment to Independent Audit
Contract 34
7.J. Resolution No. 2002-061 Traffic Signal Maintenance and Compensation -
Minor Revision to Previously Approved Joint Participation Agreement
(JPA) with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 35
7.K. FORMUNIS Software Agreement - MUNIS - BMI Asset Tracking 39
7 L Termination of Lease with City of Vero Beach for 16th Street Ball Field -
Future Agreement with Indian River County School Board for Parking
Spaces 40
7.M. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment No. 017 41
7.N. HUD Contract for Grant Award FL 29B109003 - Continuum Wide
Homeless Management Information System - Service Pointe Upgrade 2001
- Indian River Homeless Services Council, Inc. Agreement - 2001
Supportive Housing Grant Agreement (New) - Homeless Management
Information System (HMIS) - (Department of Housing and Urban
Development [HUD]) 46
7.0. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Contract for Grant
Award FL 29B109002 - Family Options Transitional Housing - 2001
Supportive Housing Grant Agreement (New) Program Funds - Indian
River Homeless Services Council, Inc. - Homeless Assistance Center, Inc.
49
7.P. Bid #4069 - Mobile Lift Station - Utilities Department Wastewater
Treatment Division - Thompson Pump & Mfg. Co. 50
7.Q. Bid #4077 - Sodium Hypochlorite Metering Pump - Utilities Department
Wastewater Treatment Division - Florida Water Processing 52
8.A. JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT - INVESTMENT
REPORT AND AMENDMENT TO INVESTMENT POLICY (TO CHANGE
THE BENCHMARK) 53
8 B JIM EGAN - MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL 55
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RECONSIDERATION OF GRAVES BROTHERS INC.'S
REQUEST TO ABANDON A PORTION OF OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY
LOCATED NORTH OF C.R.510 AND SOUTH OF U.S.#1 (Legislative) 55
2
-r
LI 4
Or 171
Cr
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED CONTRACT OFFER TO LOST TREE
VILLAGE CORPORATION AND DRAFT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
WITH CITY OF VERO BEACH AND TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
FOR PURCHASE OF THE LOST TREE ISLANDS 60
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER, INC.'S REQUEST
FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR A GROUP HOME
FACILITY - (SP-MA-02-09-52/CDPLUS #95100005-31175) (Quasi -Judicial)
69
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-027 - ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT - 16.85 ACRES FROM RS -6 AND RM -6 TO RM -8 (EAST
SIDE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET
NORTH OF 41ST STREET - REQUESTED BY BOBO FAMILY 76
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING •- RESOLUTION NO. 2002-062 - PAVING & DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO 34TH AVENUE SW, 35TH AVENUE SW BETWEEN
13TH STREET SW AND 9TH STREET SW (OSLO ROAD) IN GROVENOR
ESTATES SUBDIVISION - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. 9918
87
9.A.6. PUBLIC HEARING - CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY FOR A CLASS El CERTIFICATE FOR THE PLACE AT VERO
BEACH 94
9 B 1 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM BRIAN T. HEADY TO
SPEAK 97
9 13 2 PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REPORT OF JIM EGAN - MARINE
RESOURCES COUNCIL (moved from 8.B) 98
10.A. UPDATE ON DELAYING TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PAYMENTS UNTIL
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL
PROJECTS
101
11 B 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-063 - RE -AUTHORIZATION OF
IMPOSITION OF E911 FEE 105
3
2
A
11 B 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS/DIVISION OF
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT - FY 2002/03 EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT, PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE TRUST
FUND (EMPA) BASE GRANT AGREEMENT (STATE AND
FEDERALLY FUNDED SUBGRANT AGREEMENT) 109
11.C.1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL - STAINLESS STEEL TOILETS AND
LAVATORIES - WAIVE SEALED BIDS - U. S. SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.
110
11.C.2. NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY - FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE - CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 111
11.C.3. MAIN LIBRARY - FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE - BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 112
11.G.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-064 - FLORIDA RECREATION
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) - WEST
WABASSO PARK IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 2 113
11.G.2. ANSLEY PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO 13TH STREET S.W115
11.G.3.. HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, INC. - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT 117
11.II.1.
11112.
THE INLET AT SEBASTIAN, LLC - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION ON US#1, ROSELAND ROAD
AND OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY 118
NORTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT (REVERSE
OSMOSIS) - IMPLEMENTATION OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RESOLUTION AGREEMENT -
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 2 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. -
WORK AUTHORIZATION MASTELLER, MOLER & REED, INC. -
DESIGN OF DEMINERALIZED-CONCENTRATE DISCHARGE LINE
AUTHORIZED 120
4
1,3
13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - PATRIOT'S DAY, SEPTEMBER 11th 122
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT 123
14 B SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
14 C ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD 123
September 3, 2002
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25t" Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, September 3, 2002. Present were Ruth Stanbridge, Chairman; John W. Tippin,
Vice Chairman; Commissioners Fran B. Adams; Caroline D Ginn; and Kenneth R. Macht.
Also present were James E Chandler, County Administrator; Paul G. Bangel, County
Attorney; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
INVOCATION
Commissioner Ginn delivered the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice Chairman Tippin led the Pledge to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Stanbridge advised of a replacement page for 164 in the backup. She
further advised of additional backup information for items 9.A.2., 9.A.4., 9.A.5., and 11.C.3.
September 3, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously made the above
changes to the agenda.
Commissioner Adams requested that since Jim Egan ofthe Marine Resources Council
is neither a Constitutional Officer nor a Government Agency, his Item 8 B be moved on the
agenda to 9 B 2 under Public Discussion.
Chairman Stanbridge recalled that Mr Egan had requested 10 minutes but would be
limited to 3 minutes under Public Discussion.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously agreed to move
Item 8 B to 9.B.2. and to allow Mr. Egan up to 10 minutes to
make his presentation.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
5.A. LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA AWARENESS MONTH -
SEPTEMBER 2002
The Chairman read the following proclamation and presented it to Jennifer Whalen
who invited everyone to the annual Light the Night walk in Riverside Park on September
28, 2002, beginning at 6 pm.
September 3, 2002
2
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2002
AS LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, blood -related cancers currently afflict more than 700,000 Americans, with an
estimated 110 000 new cases diagnosed each year; and
WHEREAS, leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma will kill an estimated 60,500 people in the
United States this year; and
WHEREAS, The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, through voluntary contributions, is
dedicated to finding cures for these diseases through research efforts and the support for those that
suffer from them and
WHEREAS, The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society maintains an office in Indian River
County to support patients with these diseases and their family members in the State of Florida; and
WHEREAS, last year The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society provided $36 million in
research funding for blood -related cancers, and nearly 76 cents of every dollar spent by The
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society is used to support patient services, education and research
activities; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County is similarly committed to the eradication of these
diseases and supports the treatment of its citizens afflicted with them, and encourages private
efforts to enhance research funding and education programs to address these diseases.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the month of September, 2002, be
designated as
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA AWARENESS MONTH
in Indian River County and the Board encourages participation in voluntary activities to support
education programs and the funding of research programs to find a cure for blood related cancers.
Adopted this 3rd day of September, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
September 3, 2002
5.B. AMERICAN CHARACTER WEEK - SEPTEMBER 8-14, 2002
The Chairman read the following proclamation and presented it to Judge Joe Wild
who accepted on behalf of the Character Counts! Coalition of Indian River County. Judge
Wild thanked the Board for the proclamation and advised of a Coalition program to
recognize and honor business employees of character. The Coalition is looking for
nominations for the awards which will be presented at a luncheon. Judge Wild also recalled
tragedies of September 11, 2001 and the character displayed by the firefighters who entered
the damaged World Trade Center buildings in New York City and the citizens who took
over the aircraft to prevent it from crashing into another populated building. We can be
proud we are Americans and be proud of the character displayed on that day by our fellow
Americans.
It
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING SEPTEMBER 8 — 14, 2002, AS
AMERICAN CHARACTER WEEK
WHEREAS, September 11, 2002, will be the first anniversary of unprecedented
terrorist attacks on American soil, resulting in momentous loss of life and property; and
WHEREAS, with the hopes of bringing Americans to their knees, instead they brought
us to our feet and
WHEREAS, this anniversary of tragedy is also an anniversary of triumph, a triumph of
character — courage over cowardice kindness over cruelty service over selfishness,
responsibility over indifference, love over hate, hope over fear and freedom over repression; and
WHEREAS, September 11th should not only be remembered as a day of great
misfortune, but as a reminder of the great good fortune we possess in the character of our
people and in living in a country where character counts; and
WHEREAS, American Character Week should be a week of action devoted to
community service, which improves neighborhoods, eases suffering and reduces injustice while
enhancing the lives and strengthening the characters of those who render it.
September 3, 2002
4
•
rf
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of September 8 through
September 14 2002, be designated as
AMERICAN CHARACTER WEEK
in Indian River County, and the Board calls upon all citizens to demonstrate respect for the
victims of this terrible day and also honor and celebrate the countless acts of courage,
compassion loyalty responsibility and other qualities that represent the best in American
character.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairm
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 23, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of July 23, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes
of July 23, 2002, as written and distributed.
6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 6, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of August 6, 2002. Commissioner Ginn asked for insertion of the word
"original" (draft minutes on page 289 of the backup) on the withdrawal of the first motion
on item 9.A.2.
September 3, 2002
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously approved the minutes
of August 6, 2002, as amended.
6.C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 13, 2002
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of August 13, 2002. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippm, the Board unanimously approved the minutes
of August 13, 2002, as written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. Reports
The following reports were received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to
the Board:
Vero Lakes Water Control District Notice of Meeting on 9/16/02 at 9:00 a.m.
at 3333 20`h Street, Vero Beach, Florida, to elect 2 supervisors, receive reports
of the engineer and other officials, and transact other business.
7.B. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2002:
September 3, 2002
6
HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AUGUST 15, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of August 9, 2002 to August 15 2002.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk for the period August 9-15,
2002, as requested.
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
O 021902
O 021903
O 021904
0021905
0021906
0021907
O 021908
O 021909
O 021910
O 021911
O 021912
O 021913
O 021914
O 021915
O 021916
O 021917
0328566
O 328567
O 328568
O 328569
0328570
O 328571
0328572
O 328573
AMERICAN DENTAL PLAN (FLORIDA)
PINKERTON, DOREEN A
KRUCZKIEWICZ, LORIANE
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFOR
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
IRS - ACS
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL CREDIT
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
FLORIDA DEPT OF EDUCATION
NACO/SOUTHEAST
SALEM TRUST COMPANY
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
FL SDU
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
ARMFIELD-WAGNER APPRAISAL
ATLANTIC REPORTING
ADAMSON, RONALD
ABS PUMPS, INC
2002-08-08
2002-08-13
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-14
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
907.44
272.00
138.50
37.75
92.31
50.00
50.00
142.85
2,500.00
80,652.66
175.17
132.00
10,239.26
122.41
132.46
7,906.17
107.45
929.75
10.38
1,212.45
250.00
59.00
530.63
14,612.00
September 3, 2002
CHECK
NUMBER
O 328574
O 328575
O 328576
O 328577
O 328578
O 328579
O 328580
0328581
O 328582
O 328583
0328584
O 328585
O 328586
O 328587
0328588
0328589
0328590
O 328591
0328592
0328593
O 328594
O 328595
O 328596
0328597
O 328598
O 328599
O 328600
0328601
O 328602
0328603
O 328604
0328605
0328606
0328607
0328608
0328609
0328610
O 328611
0328612
0328613
0328614
0328615
O 328616
0328617
0328618
0328619
0328620
0328621
O 328622
0328623
0328624
0328625
O 328626
0328627
0328628
O 328629
0328630
NAME
AQUAGENIX
AA ELECTRIC S E INC
ALL RITE WATER CONDITIONING
ADDISON OIL CO
ATLANTIC COASTAL TITLE CORP
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER, INC
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC
AMERICAN REPORTING, INC
ARCO GARAGE DOOR CO
AMERIPATH FL, INC
A T & T
ANCOR CORF INC.
ACT INC
ABC PRINTING CO
A M ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
ACTION WELDING SUPPLY INC
AHEAD HEADGEAR INC
ABSOLUTE PROTECTION TEAM
AMAZON HOSE
AMERICAN ENGINEERING SERVICES
AUTO SUPPLY CO WEST
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BREWER ELECTRIC ENTERPRISE INC
BARTON, JEFFREY K- CLERK
BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
BURGOON BERGER
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
BURNETT, EDWIN
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BELLSOUTH
BEAZER HOMES, INC
BREVARD ORTHHOPAEDIC CLINIC
BRACKETT, PARKER & ASSOCIATES
BIOMASS PROCESSING
BARAJAS, ALMA ROSA
BULLARD, REUN
BRONANO, WILLIAM
BELLSOUTH INTELLIVENTURES
BELLSOUTH
CABOT LODGE
CAMERON & BARXLEY COMPANY
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
CLEMENTS PEST CONTROL
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CARDINAL ROOFING & SIDING, INC
CLEM, POLACKWICH AND VOCELLE
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
CASSINARI, CHRIS
CLEANNET USA
September 3, 2002
8
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
CHECK
AMOUNT
281.00
193.85
121.25
599.18
322.00
15.29
12.00
52,931.14
35.80
45.00
182.50
22.95
26.21
138.60
3,260.00
9.80
829.00
35.84
247.40
179.94
95.00
13,500.00
3,782.24
4,611.11
1,690.38
52,733.42
3,191.00
500.00
806.47
218.41
17.99
181.58
316.71
105.50
24,660.23
1,000.00
71.00
500.00
89,792.23
50.00
250.25
500.00
20.00
1,551.06
186.00
296.84
4,966.65
147.25
249.00
933.19
417.10
2,000.00
12,224.00
2,052.70
9,290.07
419.62
24,174.88
fl!r
i1
ry
•
1.0
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0328631
0328632
0328633
0328634
0328635
O 328636
O 328637
0328638
0328639
0328640
0328641
0328642
0328643
0328644
0328645
0328646
0328647
0328648
0328649
O 328650
O 328651
0328652
O 328653
O 328654
0328655
0328656
0328657
0328658
O 328659
0328660
0328661
O 328662
O 328663
0328664
0328665
0328666
0328667
O 328668
0328669
0328670
0328671
0328672
0328673
0328674
O 328675
0328676
O 328677
0328678
O 328679
O 328680
O 328681
0328682
0328683
0328684
0328685
0328686
0328687
NAME
CULBERT, DANIEL F
CARSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
CDW GOVERMENT INC
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
CAPE PUBLICATIONS INC
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS
COASTAL ORTHOPAEDIC &
CHARLIE'S LAWN MAINTENANCE INC
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CLARRY, ALISON
CLEAR ZONE
DAILY COURIER SERVICE
DAVES SPORTING GOODS
DELTA SUPPLY CO
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
DON REID FORD
DAVIDSON TITLES, INC
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
DANIEL KELL TELEPHONE
DILLON, EDWARD D
DOUGLAS PUBLICATIONS INC
DRISKELL, JEROME
DONLEY, CHESTER
DIGITAL COMBUSTION INC
DODDS, WILLIAM P
DELL MARKETING L.P.
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
E G P, INC
EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
ELDRIDGE, MYRA A
ECOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC
ELLIS, KENNETH SCOTT
EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE
ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC
FEDEX
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
FLORIDA BAR, THE
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FLORIDA SLUDGE, INC
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC
FLOW -TECHNOLOGY
F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
FACTS ON FILE INC
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE
FLORIDA PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
FIRST UNION
FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
FRENCH, GEORGE
FRP WORKSHOP
FREY, MICHAEL L
September 3, 2002
9
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15'
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
CHECK
AMOUNT
175.00
854.90
16.25
380.91
313.50
232.00
29,630.19
7,779.24
308.00
3,833.70
813.48
24.00
1,000.00
419.00
670.72
68.41
320.78
4,701.88
11,069.00
72.68
52.40
9,395.00
300.00
188.56
326.81
74.25
654.00
135.00
925.00
194.50
164.00
162.00
367.50
6,996.67
49.30
3,298.43
558.72
21.85
20.33
105.00
381.60
345.00
32,197.69
16,262.80
85.92
1,153.19
294.58
37.18
31.50
2,940.92
142.40
37.00
22,088.43
25.00
4,525.65
987.00
171.93
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
O 328688 FLINN COURT REPORTING
O 328689 FLORIDAN CAN INC
O 328690 FLESCHER, ROSEMARY
O 328691 FERRELLGAS
O 328692 GALE GROUP, THE
O 328693 GENERAL GMC, TRUCK
O 328694 GOODKNIGHT LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC
O 328695 GALLS INC
0328696 GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER
O 328697 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITIES CENTE
O 328698 GENTIVA HEALTH SERVICE
O 328699 GOUGE, EMILY
O 328700 GEISLER-STEINER, MARCIA J
O 328701 GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARM
0328702 GAGEL, SALOI
0328703 GINN, DONALD
O 328704 HAMMOND & SMITH, P A
0328705 HARVEY, CARLITA
O 328706 HERE'S FRED GOLF CO, INC
O 328707
0328708
O 328709
0328710
O 328711
0328712
0328713
0328714
0328715
0328716
0328717
O 328718
0328719
O 328720
O 328721
O 328722
0328723
O 328724
0328725
0328726
0328727
0328728
0328729
0328730
O 328731
0328732
O 328733
HELD, PATRICIA BARGO
HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER
G L I INTERNATIONAL-HACH CO
GE BETZ, INC
HARRIS SANITATION, INC
HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
HEALTHSOUTH INDIAN RIVER
HEALTHSOUTH TREASURE COAST
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
HINTON'S CARPET CLEANING
HEALTHSOUTH HOLDINGS
INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS
HUBERT, LATOSHIA
HAMPTON INN
RILE CONTROLS OF FLORIDA INC
HESSE,
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
ROBIN
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
COUNTY
COUNTY SOLID
COUNTY
BATTERY, INC
BLUEPRINT CO INC
COUNTY UTILITY
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
OXYGEN, INC
CONTRACTING CORP
MEMORIAL HOSPITPL
0328734 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL
O 328735 INDIAN RIVER OFFICE CENTRE,INC
0328736 INDIAN RIVER ALL -FAB, INC
0328737 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
0328738 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
O 328739 INDIAN RIVER HAND REHAB INC
O 328740 INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC
O 328741 JAMEISON PUBLISHERS
0328742 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
O 328743 JANNACH PROPERTIES LTD
O 328744 JONES, ELVIN
O 328745 KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
O 328746 K S M ENGINEERING &.TESTING
September 3, 2002
10
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-06-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
CHECK
AMOUNT
107.00
7,610.00
36.00
27.75
156.47
155.51
108.88
73.98
7,017.76
15,343.08
292.00
280.67
77.00
1,084.80
120.00
57.14
21,250.00
25.72
106.09
308.00
2,083.33
191.00
8,545.60
128,753.87
907.50
2,712.00
418.00
724.50
1,500.00
735.00
154.00
1,816.00
227.50
266.40
400.00
15.94
1,200.00
2,039.47
125.00
200.50
2.24
372.30
4,851.55
514.66
490.90
66.94
7,418.79
14.57
99.18
1,273.22
1,050.00
975.60
200.00
487.50
1,464.39
1,950.00
48.92
18.26
3,200.00
L
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0328747
O 328748
O 328749
O 328750
O 328751
O 328752
0328753
O 328754
O 328755
0328756
O 328757
O 328758
O 328759
0328760
O 328761
O 328762
0328763
0328764
0328765
O 328766
0328767
O 328768
O 328769
O 328770
0328771
O 328772
0328773
0328774
0328775
O 328776
0328777
O 328778
0328779
O 328780
O 328781
O 328782
O 328783
O 328784
0328785
O 328786
O 328787
O 328788
O 328789
O 328790
O 328791
O 328792
O 328793
O 328794
O 328795
0328796
0328797
O 328798
O 328799
O 328800
O 328801
O 328802
O 328803
O 328804
NAME
KRUGER CONSTRUCTION CORP
KNOWLES, CYRIL
KUESTERSTEFFEN, MIKE
KEMIRON INC
KING, STACY
LOVE MD, ROBERT M
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
L B SMITH, INC
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
LABOR FINDERS
LAFARGE ROAD MARKING, INC
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC
LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION
LICARI, LINDA
MASTELLER & MOLER ASSOC, INC
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
MAXWELL & SON, INC
MCCALL ELECTRIC, INC
MEZZINA, MICHAEL
MIKES GARAGE
MILLER, GRACE L
MULLER MINTZ, F A
MARTIN'S LAMAR
M G B CONSTRUCTION
MORA, CHRISTOPHER R
MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
MR BOB PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
MARTIN, CRISTI
METTLER-TOLEDO FLORIDA, INC
MEDICAL RECORDS SERVICES, INC
MOODY, RUTHIE
MIERAS, MOLLY
MARTIN, KEVIN
MARTIN PATHOLOGY
NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
NOWLIN, TIAIRA
NANCE, DEREK BRANSON
NEMITS, BARBARA
OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
OSCEOLA PHARMACY
ODYSSEY MANUFACTURING CO
ON ITS WAY
O -TWO SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL
PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC
P B S & J
PORT CONSOLIDATED
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
PROSPER, JANET C
PROFORMA
POWERWARE
PICKERING, REBECCA LMT
PEREZ, VICTOR
PARALEE COMPANY INC
September 3, 2002
11
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
CHECK
AMOUNT
30.00
1,039.84
90.00
2,193.36
236.50
55.00
513.14
364.84
502.60
3,301.51
7,528.00
30.02
289.00
1,500.00
73.95
2,880.00
80.54
71.98
30.00
28.62
245.00
29.06
2,980.80
92.75
1,523.00
431.29
154.65
689.59
366.00
255.50
3,000.00
8.83
290.50
19.31
15.00
83.00
456.52
359.04
381.49
38.62
448.05
50.00
2,980.34
1,663.96
39.95
4,680.00
77.50
247.48
203.53
2,000.00
2,019.34
141.87
182.00
653.50
565.00
216.00
25.00
375.00
1LJ
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
O 328805 PATTERSON, NANCY
O 328806 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
0328807 RADISSON PLAZA HOTEL
0328808 RYAN, STEPHEN R
O 328809 RIEDEL, VICTOR
O 328810 R GEORGE & ASSOCIATES, INC
O 328811 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
O 328812 R & G SOD FARMS
0328813 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
O 328814 RCL DEVELOPMENT
O 328815 REXEL CONSOLIDATED
O 328816 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
0328817 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
O 328818 ROYAL, SHARON
0328819 RS MEDICAL
0328820 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
0328821 REXEL SOUTHERN
O 328822 STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE
0328823 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
0328824 SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
0328825 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
O 328826 STALEY, LARRY
0328827 SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
0328828 STARCK, DONNA
O 328829 ST ANDREWS PRODUCTS, CO
O 328830 SUMMERLIN SEVEN SEAS INC
O 328831 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
O 328832 SEBASTIAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS
O 328833 SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION MGMT INC
O 328834 SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
0328835 SUNGARD MAILING SERVICES
O 328836 SUNCOAST COUNSELING &
O 328837 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY
O 328838 SPEIRS, DONNA
O 328839 SKATE FACTORY
O 328840 SEMBLER, CHARLES W
O 328841 SEYMOUR, LINDA
O 328842 SERRA, RACHEL
O 328843 SILVERMAN, DOUG
O 328844 SCHEURER, DEAN LMT
0328845 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
0328846 THOMAS, DEBBY L
0328847 TRI -SURE CORPORATION
O 328848 TREASURE COAST REFUSE
O 328849 TINDALE OLIVER & ASSOC., INC
0328850 TIPPIN, JOHN W
0328851. TPS OF VERO
0328852 TREASURE COAST HUMAN RESOURCE
0328853 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FL
0328854 TREASURE COAST REFUSE
0328855 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST
O 328856 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP
0328857 TOZZOLO, STEVIE
0328858 TRAINING TREE INC, THE
0328859 TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC
O 328860 TELEMETRIC SYSTEMS INC
O 328861 TERRA LAKES LLC
September 3, 2002
12
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
ran
CHECK
AMOUNT
463.75
121.60
178.00
19.95
234.63
44,118.66
923.20
325.00
77.81
500.00
2,149.61
296.27
424.10
360.50
64.00
358.80
17,632.60
12,332.01
70.63
190.21
2,009.00
94.83
510.55
8.46
188.28
8,960.00
1,691.12
177.00
125,889.30
75.00
9,929.06
1,100.00
43.66
154.00
346.50
101.70
385.00
57.93
24.00
288.00
1,878.00
504.00
264,297.88
41,951.06
2,223.26
11.02
607.50
105.00
6.45
664.61
4,576.22
1,958.00
57.93
990.00
357.70
1,798.26
54,460.93
1
4_
Fy "
Y � ��� «4,.i w�} 9e � .1+y.; � 'i^�n,. . Y 5 S4.il,KC '.irs�. 1 5,} .&r "� .+ . 4.• . ,F E- d ". {
h E &y_., :
�'.=
..,... . . . v <_ s , . , ,, . r = . ,s . : _ . , ;., .� ��,. Wit. '�' . : , x .., �a,,, 'Zs�; " s'i',"k'"�
, '1,Fl�Y'.t.z„s:�.���`"��` . ; � ,.�r � '�ss�r.2 sg, o-. •<
•
CHECK NAME CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
0328862 TONE AND ASSOCIATES INC 2002 - 08 - 15 11462 . 18
0328863 TESTAMERICA INC 2002 - 08 - 15 344 . 00
0328864 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2002 - 08 - 15 495 . 00
0328865 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2002 - 08 - 15 535 . 00
0328866 UTILITY SERVICE CO , INC 2002 - 08 - 15 4 , 375 . 00
0328867 U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP 2002 - 08 - 15 503 . 59
0328868 URGENT CARE WEST 2002 - 08 - 15 21317 . 50
0328869 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2002 - 08 - 15 22 . 16
0328870 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2002 - 08 - 15 11 , 035 . 40
0328871 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER , INC 2002 - 08 - 15 177 . 19
0328872 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 2002 - 08 - 15
0328873 VERO ORTHOPAEDICS 2r 500 . 00
2002 - OS - 15 304 . 00
0328874 VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2002 - 08 - 15
0328875 VERO BOWL 25 . 00
0328876 VERO BEACH POWERTRAIN 2002 - 08 - 15 276 . 752002 - 08 - 15
0328877 VERO BEACH , CITY OF 743 . 31
0328878 VERO BEACH SURGERY CENTER 2002 - 08 - 15 2 ' 858 . 00
0328879 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 2002 - 08 - 15 11 , 352 . 00
0328880 WILLHOFF , PATSY 493 . 00
0328881 WASTE MANAGEMENT 2002 - 08 - 15 52 . 00
2002 - 08 - 15 88 . 58
0328882 WASTE MANAGEMENT
0328883 WEST MARINE 2002 - 08 - 15 89 , 927 47
2002 - 08 - 15 323 . 99
0328884 WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC 2002 - 08 - 15
0328885 WALKER , KEITH 87 , 000 . 00
0328886 WHITE , DEBRA 2002 - 08 - 15 2002 - 08 - 15 405 . 00
0328887 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE 2002 - 08 - 15 120 . 00
0328888 WELLER POOL CONSTRUCTORS INC 2002 - 08 - 15 1 , 238 . 23
0328889 WRIGHT , LAUREL 171 , 779 . 16
0328890 WIDEBERG , SEAN 2002 - 08 - 15 2002 - 08 - 15 38 . 62
0328891 WHITE DIRECTORY OF FLORIDA INC 2002 - 08 - 15 33 . 00
0328892 XEROX CORPORATION 276 . 00
0328893 ZORC , R & SONS BUILDERS INC 2002 - 08 - 15 8 - 15 793 . 63
500 . 00
0328894 THOMAS , JAMES SR
0328895 MC NEAL , PATRICK 2002 - 08 - 15 873 . 10
2002 - 08 - 15 299 . 74
0328896 HILLERY , DORIS
2002 - 08 - 15 82 . 74
0328897 MILLER , JOSEPH
2002
0328898 . NORMAN , J . CLINTON - 08 - 15 454 . 52
2002 - 08 - 15 326 . 81
0328899 RIDGE , RICHARD
03289002002 - 08 - 15 594 . 00
VILLENEUVE , RICHARD
0328901 WODTKE , RUSSELL 2002 - 08 - 15 593 . 34
2002 - 08 - 15 275
0328902 LICARI , LINDA 77
2002 - 08 - 15 476 . 80
0328903 PHIPPS , DAVID
2002 - 08 - 15 351 . 40
0328904 ROYAL , THOMAS
2002 - 08 - 15 641 . 26
0328905 EVERETT , MELVIN
2002 - 08 - 15
0328906 ZAPPIA , FRANK 594 . 00
0328907 AMERITREND HOMES 2002 - 08 - 15 376 . 20
0328908 BEST 2002 - 08 - 15 68 . 46
QUALITY GROOMING 2002 - 08 - 15
0328909 BOYLE , ROGER 68 . 302002 - 08 - 15
0328910 BURGOON BERGER CONTSTUCTION 27 28
2002 - 08 - 15
0328911 CYRON , GEOFFREY 44 . 84
0328912 HAMILTON PLACE 2002 - 08 - 15 23 . 23
2002 - 08 - 15 44 . 12
0328913 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
2002 - 08 - 15 24 . 81
0328914 KERNS , DAVID
0328915 KORP , JAMES 2002 - 08 - 15 30 . 29
0328916 LAPITZ , LUIS 2002 - 08 - 15 22 . 87
0328917 MITCHELL , BILLY 2002 - 08 - 15 251 . 45
2002 - 08 - 15 22 , 37
September 3 , 2002
13
KKK. M
Kl' K K'a
..?? Y#d 45. 1 Y Fyj f fi ^eLS 3 f J k J A
K, . i , . .. l ., v ... ilrl.bl - u� , v .0 . . . . - r. , t l l�. . . . x
e ,. +sN . . i =
F4,
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0328918 MUTSCHLER, LAWRENCE
0328919 PATTERSON, LAURA
0328920 WAHL, SUZANNE
O 328921 ZORC, MICHAEL
0328922 BLAKE, SALLIE WYNN
O 328923 CAL BUILDERS INC
0328924 GIBBS, FRANCES K
O 328925 MC CULLUM, ROSIENA
0328926 FAULMAN, MICHAEL R
0328927 STAUBER III, WALTER J
0328928 IRBY, KEVIN
O 328929 ANDO BUILDING CORP
O 328930 PUGLIESE, SALVATORE
O 328931 SILLS-LEWIS, BARBARA
O 328932 VREDENBURGH, LENORE
0328933 HINE, JEANNE
O 328934 DU -J'S
0328935 KENNA, RICHARD J AND
0328936 KLUG, ROBERT & CARRIE
0328937 BUSKIRK, CECIL
0328938 HORNER, SHERI
0328939 0 NEIL, ROBERT J
0328940 CHANNING CORP XXIX
0328941 HODGES, ROBERT
0328942 ZWIERLEIN, KEVIN
0328943 NEIBERT, RONALD C
0328944 LANE, JOHN
0328945 ROSS, MATTHEW J
0328946 SOUTHERN CLASSIC HOMES LLC
0328947 WHITMORE, ROBERT A
0328948 TROPICAL HOMES
0328949 STORY, MILDRED
0328950 ROXBURY, TANAKA
0328951 HERTEL, ERIC
0328952 NORTH -SOUTH BUILDERS INC
0328953 RUFFIN, VERA
0328954 BIEDIGER, UTE E
0328955 ENGELMANN, HERMANN
0328956 PRUSS, ARTHUR D
0328957 NAGLE, KRISTIN
0328958 WITHEE, STEVEN
0328959 REESE, KATRESIA
0328960 MUFORD, MARGARET
0328961 POMAR JASON A
0328962 COLSTON, DAN
0328963 AMERICAN MOBILE HEALTHCARE
0328964 MASTEC ITS
0328965 CORNERSTONE MGMT AND LEASING
0328966 MORRIS, GENE
0328967 LA FOUNTAIN, JUNE
0328968 BAKER, RICHARD
0328969 HIPE, PHILIP J
0328970 BURGOON BERGER CONSTRUCTION
0328971 CROON CONSTRUCTION
0328972 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
0328973 VOGELSANG, ELMER W
0328974 SPARKS, DAVID J
0328975 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
September 3, 2002
14
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-0815
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08..15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
CHECK
AMOUNT
44.78
51.83
20.96
4.39
43.25
54.99
47.08
88.54
80.52
25.94
55.58
37.73
69.80
71.08
22.26
36.74
150.00
23.87
35.45
29.80
48.23
63.94
131.59
2.95
37.63
40.40
22.58
87.57
75.56
31.89
38.57
63.40
14.41
62.40
20.18
6.54
17.71
102.58
28.90
48.34
9.18
5.11
36.66
26.51
30.70
52.32
289.61
75.51
3.17
27.30
25.76
37.91
68.77
93.80
104.42
45.76
30.28
13.62
�' 8
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0328976
0328977
0328978
0328979
0328980
0328981
0328982
0328983
0328984
0328985
0328986
0328987
0328988
0328989
0328990
0328991
0328992
0328993
0328994
0328995
0328996
0328997
0328998
0328999
0329000
0329001
0329002
0329003
0329004
0329005
0329006
0329007
0329008
0329009
O 329010
O 329011
NAME
CENTURY 21 SEA TREK
TAYLOR, KAYE
L IGHTFOOT, JUDITH E
G H 0 VERO BEACH INC
SMITH, JOBY
TOZZOLO BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
BEAZER HOMES CORP
FRATCHER, PAULA M
KELLY, CHAD
BLOCK SAMUEL A
ROWE, JOSEPH & AGNES
SEA OAKS INVESTMENT LTD
KIRBY, WILLIAM A
JENNING, CLANNIE
MASTERS, ROGER
BORING, GREGORY
MULLER HOMES INC
LEHRFELD, RICK AND MARY
GARCIA, CARLOS & SISILIA
SELECT CUSTOM WORK
BANKS, NIKI A
WELSH, GRAHAM
BLANTON, WADE
BARKWELL, SHARON
WAGNER, TAMMY P
FLANARY, MICHA
REGNIER, GRACE OR JOHN
INNOVATIVE PLACEMENTS INC
HARRISON, JAMES
HRMC
KIRKLAND, NINA
COMET PROPERTIES
PENA, CECELIA
WILLIAMSON, CHARLES A
JOHNSON, SALLY AND JOHNNY
STOPYRA, GABRIELA
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
7. C. Approval of Warrants
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 22, 2002:
September 3, 2002
15
•
CHECK
AMOUNT
74.05
55.61
43.00
53.08
29.90
37.85
131.70
26.56
36.73
46.24
101.54
41.15
43.33
8.82
83.52
43.60
100.00
51.03
37.96
58.91
83.99
45.96
31.88
1.77
69.48
4.70
26.82
86.21
22.84
124.65
71.55
61.36
70.00
12.19
82.28
75.00
1,900,411.18
HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AUGUST 22, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
EDWIN M. FRY, JR., FINANCE DIRECTOR
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants issued by the Board of County
Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Clerk to the Board, for the
time period of August 16, 2002 to August 22, 2002.
Attachment:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the list
of warrants issued by the Clerk for the period August 16-22,
2002, as requested.
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
CHECK
AMOUNT
0021918
0021919
0021920
0021921
0021922
0021923
0021924
0021925
O 021926
O 021927
0021928
0021929
0295426
0296486
0296503
0296505
0296523
0296872
0296919
0296928
0297285
0298029
0298041
0298757
0298763
0298767
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
GERRY, RAYMOND
GRAUL, STEVE
KOFKE, KYLE
KOVALESKI, JOSEPH
MC CORMACK, SEAN
MOLINA, ANTHONY
MORGAN, JOHN
MURDOCK, STEVE
O'CONNOR, JOHN
PODARAS, NATHAN
VERO BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC.
HERTEL, ERIC
DRONCHI, RUTHANN ALDD
JONES, BOBBIE
WINDSOR PROPERTIES, INC
FLORIDA AIDS RIDE #2
HARDEN, KATINA L
WATSON, SALLIE C
CLAYTON, CRAIG
WRIGHT, ROOSEVELT
PADGETT, ROBERT
MALONEY, KATE K
GHO VERO BEACH INC
YVONNES TRAVEL HOUSE INC
SHAFFERS AUTO SERVICE
2002-08-16
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2002-08-20
2001-01-04
2001-01-25
2001-01-25
2001-01-25
2001-01-25
2001-01-31
2001-01-31
2001-01-31
2001-02-08
2001-02-22
2001-02-22
2001-03-08
2001-03-08
2001-03-08
September 3, 2002
4,915.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
15,000.00
.00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
CHECK
NUMBER
02987
02987
02987
02987
02991
029920
029992
029993
029993
029995
029996
0299980
0299984
0300011
0300026
0300045
0301001
0301002
0301005
0301012
0301018
0301025
0301055
0301863
0301875
0301882
0301905
0301952
0301967
0301982
0301992
0301998
0302009
0302029
0302034
0302036
0302451
0302481
0302485
0303232
0303640
0304026
0304027
0304033
0304089
0304858
0304865
0304884
0304893
0304898
0305315
0305342 P
0305627 L
0305654
0306000
0306028 G
0306037 I
0306040 RE
NAME
91 R ZORC & SONS BUILDERS INC
96 YOUNG, JANI
98 DERRICO CONSTRUCTION CORP
99 SAUBERT, PHILIP A AND
87 DI TROCCHIO, MARIA
8 PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION
3 BLANTON, DONALD
1 GARCIA, ARTURO
6 HOLIDAY BUILDERS
3 FLOWERS, PHYLLIS
8 SCHNEIDER/ DONALD AND
GAYESKI, THOMAS OR
IDLEWYLD CORP INC
ESTATE OF PETER SABONJOHN
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
HICKS, RODNEY C AND
PILGRIMS REST PB CHURCH
HALE INDIAN RIVER GROVES INC
MERRILL, CRAIG AND
FITZPATRICK, DONALD SR
FUCHS, JOHN
PETERSON, ERICA
MC DONALD PROP
ADDERLY, DUDLEY
BRINK, KATHLEEN
GAFFNEY, JOHN
ZUCKERMAN, HERMAN
WARE, KATHY
MGB CONSTRUCTION
MOORE, BETTY
BURGOON & BERGER
BURGOON BERGER CONST CO
WHITE, ROBERT M
RANDALL, RYAN
BOATRIGHT, KARYN
SHIVER, JUDITH R
DANIELS, MARK AND
HETZEL, CYNTHIA A
SOLIS, JESUS E
AUTO PARTS OF VERO
HENDERSON, SUE
KELLY CONSTRUCTION AND DEV INC
HOLSTEIN, SANDRA S
SIEFERTSON EUGENE E AND
SHARP, ROBERT L
TIMMER, DAWN
MCDONALD PROPERTIES
WEIST, MIKE
KNITTER, KENNETH
AMERITREND HOMES
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
OWDERLY, PATRICIA
ARSEN, HELMER
MURRAY, JAMES H
WHITTEN, SAYLER
OLDMAN, STUART AND
NGRAM, JAMES E
XFORD BUILDERS
September 3, 2002
17
CHECK
DATE
2001-03-08
2001-03-08
2001-03-08
2001-03-08
2001-03-15
2001-03-15
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-03-29
2001-04-19
2001-04-19
2001-04-19
2001-04-19
2001-04-19
2001-04-19
2001-04-19
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-03
2001-05-10
2001-05-10
2001-05-10
2001-05-24
2001-05-31
2001-06-07
2001-06-07
2001-06-07
2001-06-07
2001-06-21
2001-06-21
2001-06-21
2001-06-21
2001-06-21
2001-06-28
2001-06-28
2001-07-05
2001-07-05
2001-07-12
2001-07-12
2001-07-12
2001-07-12
CHECK
AMOUNT
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
.00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
.00 VOID
. 00 VOID
.00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
r LI
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0306053 BROWN, JAMES A JR
0306054 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
0306064 MANGARELL, DIANE
0306081 PARADE OF SHOES #8517
0306866 KNAPP JR., EUGENE E
0306884 LAVIN, PETER J
0306909 HALL, JAMES D
0307347 CLASS, HELEN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
032
032
032
032
032
032
032
032
0329
0329
0329
0329
0329
0329
0329
0329
03290
03290
03290
03290
03290
03290
03290
032903
032903
032903
032903
032903
032903
032903
032903
0329038
0329039
0329040
0329041
0329042
307362 RCL DEVELOPMENT
307368 GIANAKIS, CHRIS
307382 ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES
307704 AUTO PARTS OF VERO
307717 MULLER, HENRY J
307742 MONTANEZ, GLORIA AND
316075 FRANCIS, MELANIE
17466 HUSSAMY, OMAR MD
26171 BRANNON, ROSEMARY
26475 MORGAN, YOLANDA
27148 MCCLURE, BILL
27334 WHITMAN, IAN AND DINA
27648 VLANGAS, NICK
27673 CHASTEEN, TIFFANY
27713 BRYANT, JERRY L
7962 MARTIN CO CLERK OF COURT
8095 WYNN, OLA MAE
8701 GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARM
8763 MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
8797 PORT CONSOLIDATED
9012 A A FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC
9013 AMERICAN WATER WORKS
9014 ACE PLUMBING, INC
015 ALBERTSON'S #4357
016 ALPHA ACE HARDWARE
017 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
018 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND
019 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
020 AUTO SUPPLY CO OF VERO BEACH,
021 ADDISON OIL CO
022 ALLIED ELECTRONICS, INC
23 ANESTHESIA OF INDIAN RIVER, INC
24 A T & T
25 AMERICAS
26 ASHBROOK CORPORATION
27 ALBERTSON'S #4357
28 ANIMAL MEDICAL CLINIC
29 ALL COUNTY MOWER & EQUIP CO
0 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1 AMERICAN REPORTING, INC
2 ARCH WIRELESS
3 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO
4 ALTERATIONS
5 ALL FLORIDA REALTY SRVS, INC
6 ARTHUR J GALLAGHER & CO
7 ABC PRINTING CO
AQUA -MARINE SERVICES
ALLIED TRAILER SALES
ANGLE, JEAN H
AKINS, BUDDY
ARROW
-TECH
September 3, 2002
INC
& RENTALS
CHECK
DATE
2001-07-12
2001-07-12
2001-07-12
2001-07_12
2001-07_26
2001-07-26
2001-07-26
2001-08-02
2001-08-02
2001-08-02
2001-08-02
2001-08-09
2001-08-09
2001-08-09
2002-01-10
2002-02-07
2002-06-27
2002-07-03
2002-07-18
2002-07-18
2002-07-25
2002-07-25
2002-07-25
2002-07-31
2002-07-31
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-15
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08_22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08_22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08_22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
18
CHECK
AMOUNT
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
. 00 VOID
284.50
112.00
81.00
13.98
18.98
105.00
385.54
684.09
2,358.21
1,835.08
1,943.90
224.64
19.13
19.01
878.14
971.74
15.00
8.45
140.73
40.00
7.00
710.50
23.00
465.00
13,218.00
6.86
631.90
150.00
51.87
11.85
2,400.00
t �
•
CHECK
NUMBER
032904
032904
032904
032904
032904
032904
0329049
0329050
0329051
0329052
0329053
0329054
0329055
0329056
0329057
0329058
O 329059
0329060
O 329061
0329062
0329063
0329064
0329065
0329066
0329067
0329068
0329069
0329070
0329071
0329072
0329073
0329074
0329075
O 329076
0329077
O 329078
0329079
0329080
0329081
0329082
O 329083
0329084
0329085
O 329086
0329087
O 329088
0329089
O 329090
0329091
0329092
0329093
0329094
0329095
0329096 D
0329097 D
0329098 D
0329099 D
NAME
3 ATLANTIC TRUCK CENTER
4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
5 BENSONS LOCK SERVICE
6 BUREAU OF ECONOMIC & BUSINESS
7 BARTON, JEFFREY K -CLERK
8 BURGOON BERGER
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
BRODART CO
BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION
BOOKS ON TAPE INC
BEAZER HOMES, INC
BRADFORD, MADGE A
BELLSOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
BASE CAMP OUTLET
BRISKIE, RON
BLACK DIAMOND
BASS-CARLTON SOD INC
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF IRC
BOYER, BRANDON
BROWN, NADINE M
BURSICK, SOFIE D
BETZ, DAVID
CAMERON & BARKLEY CO
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
CHANDLER EQUIPMENT CO, INC
COASTAL GRAPHICS
COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS
COLKITT SHEET METAL & AIR, INC
COMMUNICATIONS INT'L INC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
CITRUS WCCDS APARTMENTS
CLEM, POLACKWICH AND VOCELLE
CENTER FOR THE ARTS
CUSTOM CARRIAGES, INC
CHIVERS NORTH AMERICA
CORVEL CORPORATION
CLIFF BERRY, INC
CES
CLIFFORD, MIKE
COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
CENTER FOR EMOTIONAL AND
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CLARRY, ALISON
CITICAPITAL (SM)
COASTAL BIO -SYSTEMS
DELTA SUPPLY CO
DEMCO INC
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
DEPENDABLE DODGE, INC
ICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC
ATA SUPPLIES, INC
ATA FLOW SYSTEMS, INC
ADE PAPER COMPANY
September 3, 2002
19
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
93,933.00
6,047.77
9.00
130.46
7,716.00
500.00
918.96
802.31
923.68
149.00
500.00
80.50
377.60
99.90
61.74
249.60
784.00
5,366.28
140.03
52.21
7.50
214.00
151.02
2,741.48
40.50
68.51
385.98
892.31
696.00
18,697.29
2,568.83
1,346.00
247.82
13,830.00
88.65
64.60
936.08
75.00
2,021.69
300.00
121.61
6.50
570.00
12,005.91
393.79
15.90
24.00
7,310.16
304.00
52.94
458.99
2,238.98
205.80
2,096.85
182.79
28,356.00
330.99
•
•
CHECK NAME
NUMBER
0329100
O 329101
O 329102
0329103
O 329104
O 329105
0329106
0329107
O 329108
0329109
O 329110
O 329111
O 329112
0329113
O 329114
0329115
0329116
O 329117
O 329118
0329119
0329120
0329121
0329122
O 329123
0329124
0329125
0329126
0329127
0329128
0329129
0329130
0329131
0329132
0329133
0329134
0329135
0329136
0329137
0329138
0329139
0329140
0329141
O 329142
O 329143
0329144
0329145
0329146
0329147
0329148
0329149
0329150
0329151
0329152
0329153
0329154
0329155
0329156
0329157
DOWNTOWN PRODUCE INC
D ILLON, EDWARD D
DLT SOLUTIONS INC
E -Z BREW COFFEE SERVICE, INC
E G P, INC
E BSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES
ELDRIDGE, MYRA A
ENVIRONMENT SAFETY & HEALTH LC
EVERGLADES FARM
ENNIS PAINT INC
EXTERIOR COATING BY
FEDEX
FELLSMERE, CITY OF
FLORIDA BOLT AND NUT CO
FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO
FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC
FLORIDA WILDLIFE COMMISSION
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY OF
FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
FLINN, SHEILA I
FLORIDAFFINITY, INC
FATHER & SON CARPET, INC
FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
F & W PUBLICATIONS INC
FACTICON, INC
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK
FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL
FRENCH, GEORGE
FLINN COURT REPORTING
FLUID SYSTEMS & CONTROLS, INC
FLORIDA CHILDREN'S FORUM
GALE GROUP, THE
GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC
GENE'S AUTO GLASS
GOODKNIGHT LAWN -EQUIPMENT, INC
GALLS INC
. GOLF AGRONOMICS
G H 0 DEVELOPMENT
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARM
GOVCONNECTION, INC
GORDINEER, LISA
GRANITUR, ERIC
GOULD, COOKSEY,FENNEL,
HARRISON UNIFORMS -196
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO
HUNTER AUTO SUPPLIES
HERITAGE BOOKS, INC
HILL MAiNUFACTURING
HACH COMPANY
HIGHLANDS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
HEARNDON CONSTRUCTION
HOLIDAY BUILDERS
HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENTER
HUGHES, GARY
HERAN, V S
September 3, 2002
ONEIL,
BEACH
20
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
119.80
300.00
1,125.00
18.00
183.75
57.28,
234.50
2,907.50
614.80
18,658.00
500.00
49.77
138.58
164.25
474.40
1,045.00
46,223.84
75.75
25.00
104.01
1,981.85
217.00
4,802.50
1,178.50
50.00
1,500.00
80.36
3,075.00
835.40
25.00
2,209.15
107.00
856.04
35.00
519.54
163.33
483.92
242.16
61.97
358.05
500.00
542.40
4,253.49
34.90
500.00
10,000.00
131.64
28,350.00
477.20
26.00
108.51
174.70
135.00
250.00
1,000.00
193.88
6.50
1,258.00
yj
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0329158
O 329159
0329160
0329161
0329162
0329163
0329164
0329165
0329166
0329167
0329168
O 329169
O 329170
O 329171
0329172
0329173
0329174
O 329175
0329176
0329177
0329178
0329179
O 329180
0329181
O 329182
O 329183
0329184
O 329185
O 329186
0329187
0329188
O 329189
0329190
0329191
0329192
O 329193
O 329194
O 329195
0329196
O 329197
O 329198
O 329199
O 329200
O 329201
0329202
O 329203
O 329204
0329205
0329206
0329207
O 329208
O 329209
0329210
O 329211
September 3, 2002
NAME
INDIAN RIVER
INDIAN RIVER
INDIAN RIVER
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY
COUNTY SOLID
COUNTY HEALTH
COUNTY
I B M CORPORATION
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
INDIAN
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
BATTERY, INC
COUNTY UTILITY
COUNTY
COUNTY ANIMAL
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
ALL -FAB, INC
HAND REHAB INC
JAMES PUBLISHING, INC
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
JONES, CYRIL
JUDICIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
JACOBS AIR WATER SYSTEMS
KNIGHT & MATHIS, INC
KURTZ,. ERIC C MD
KRUGER.CONSTRUCTION CORP
K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
K -MART #7294
KAFER, CHRISTOPHER J, JR
KAREN POWER TOWER, INC
KOSHCKE, EVA
LESCO, INC
LABODIN, BRIDGETTE
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
L B SMITH, INC
LIGHT SOURCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
LESCO, INC
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC
LANGSTON, HESS, BOLTON,ZNOSKO
L INDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
LEGENDARY CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND PROPERTIES
LAVERICK CONSTRUCTION
MAXWELL PLUMBING, INC
MAXWELL & SON, INC
MIKES GARAGE
MILNER DOCUMENT PRODUCTS
MAX DAVIS & ASSOCICATES
MARTIN'S LAMAR UNIFORMS
MASTELLER & MOLER, INC
MIDDLETON, KENT
MARTIN COUNTY PETROLEUM
MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE
MCGRIFF, SHARON
MARTIN, CRISTI
MORTON SALT
MULTICOM INC
MIERAS, MOLLY
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,000.00
17,980.50
60.00
375.00
50.00
1,445.90
2,795.28
617.50
25.00
13,715.49
45.75
194.40
377.76
315.76
4,449.15
54.81
264.00
857.50
16.28
59.00
210.00
54.62
34.45
112.62
375.00
54.40
123.75
27.75
760.48
943.90
685.90
272.75
108.94
2,773.52
200.00
186.97
1,000.00
500.00
500.00
180.20
188.27
540.00
1,978.36
66.00
60.51
28,036.00
10,752.93
1,451.78
419.77
209.00
119.00
1,157.06
1,420.32
37.33
•
21
Epi
.s f f L.
14* 1 J ll
CHECK
NUMBER
NAME
0329212 MUNIS INC
0329213 MASSEY, RICHARD
0329214 MILLER, MABEL
0329215 MIDLANTIC DATA SYSTEMS
0329216 NACD LEAGUE CITY
0329217 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
0329218 NICOSIA, ROGER J DO
0329219 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY
0329220 NIKE USA INC
0329221 NOWLIN, TIAIRA
0329222 OFFICE PRODUCTS & SERVICE
0329223 OCLC, INC
0329224 OFFICE DEPOT, INC
0329225 OSCEOLA PHARMACY
0329226 PARRS RENTAL INC
0329227 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY
0329228. PETTY CASH
0329229 PORT CONSOLIDATED
0329230 POSTMASTER
0329231 PAGE, LIVINGSTON
0329232 PALM PARADISE PARK
0329233 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION
0329234 PUBLIX PHARMACY #0385
0329235 PASSAGE ISLAND HOMES, INC
0329236 PERSONNEL PLUS INC
0329237 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING SVC
0329238 PER -SE TECHNOLOGIES INC
0329239 PERKINS PHARMACY
0329240 PUBLIC SOLUTIONS LLC
0329241 PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS
0329242 RADISSON PLAZA HOTEL
0329243 RINGHAVER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
0329244 ROHANI, SASAN
0329245 REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD
0329246 ROBERTS & REYNOLDS PA
0329247 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC
0329248 R & G SOD FARMS
0329249 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS & MORE
0329250 ROYAL CUP COFFEE
0329251 REGIONS INTERSTATE BILLING
0329252 ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET
0329253 RADIODETECTION CORP
0329254 RINKER MATERIALS
0329255 SAFETY KLEEN
0329256 SEWELL HARDWARE CO, INC
0329257 SOUTHERN EAGLE DISTRIBUTING,
0329258 SOUTHSIDE VETERINARY HOSPITAL
0329259 STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO
0329260 SUNCOAST WELDING SUPPLIES INC
0329261 SUNSHINE PHYSICAL THERAPY
0329262 SERVICE REFRIGERATION
0329263 SUN TELEPHONE, INC
0329264 SUNQUEST, INC
0329265 SIGNS IN A DAY
0329266 SEXTON, HILDY
0329267 SPALDING
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
55,046.65
37.50
15.00
2,212.05
60.02
111.88
7,400.00
61.80
40.57
37.33
347.84
510.00
599.99
626.14
296.15
235.48
5.00
19,530.61
148.00
490.00
407.50
35.46
127.95
500.00
1,140.00
57.12
16,182.50
45.82
11,302.56
299.00
178.00
12,519.23
6.00
68.98
277.74
676.40
125.00
113.70
88.96
461.86
205.37
12,372.20
371.25
254.46
97.99
524.80
288.69
7.68
351.10
152.00
2,139.00
238.00
500.00
20.00
80.00
782.40
September 3, 2002
22
•
•
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0329268
0329269
O 329270
0329271
O 329272
O 329273
0329274
0329275
0329276
0329277
0329278
0329279
0329280
0329281
0329282
0329283
0329284
0329285
O 329286
0329287
0329288
O 329289
0329290
0329291
0329292
0329293
0329294
0329295
0329296
0329297
0329298
0329299
0329300
0329301
0329302
0329303
0329304
0329305
0329306
0329307
0329308
0329309
0329310
0329311
0329312
0329313
0329314
0329315
0329316
0329317
0329318
0329319
0329320
O 329321
0329322
O 329323 V
0329324
NAME
SUN BELT MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC
SELIG INDUSTRIES
SMITH BROS CONT EQUIP
SMITH, MARY
SYSCO OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA
STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC
SOUTH FLORIDA TRANE
SEBASTIAN, CITY OF
STEVENS PRINTING
SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL
SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE
SOUTHERN EMBROIDERY WORKS
SEBASTIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
SPEIRS, DONNA -
SKATE FACTORY
STERICYCLE INC
SERRA, RACHEL
SUNNYTECH INC- FL
SILVERMAN, DOUG
SATTELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC
ST PETER'S HUMAN SERVICES, INC
SUNCAM INC
SCHMITZ, BRIAN
SCLAFANI WILLIAMS/CT REPORTERS
SCHEINER, HOWARD PA
SPIGARELLI, DELORES
SELZER, FLORENCE
TARMAC
TITLEIST
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL
TREASURE COAST ANIMAL CLINIC
TEXACO/SHELL
TESNOW, RONALD L
TARGET PHARMACY RECEIVABLES
T A P SOD
SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST
TARGET STORES COMMERCIAL
TOZZOLO, STEVIE
TRICARE REGION E
TESTAMERICA INC
TARBOX, ANN
TREASURE COAST CLEANING
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
U S FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP
URGENT CARE WEST
UNISHIPPERS
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNITED HEALTH CARE
USFILTER RECOVERY
VELDE FORD, INC
VERO BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO BEACH, CITY OF
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS,INC
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER, INC
ILLAGE ANIMAL CLINIC
VERO LAKE ESTATES VOLUNTEER
September 3, 2002
23
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
955.25
482.76
875.00
27.62
548.85
3,482.90
5,023.00
141,140.00
115.00
1,486.76
2,544.72
196.00
25.00
234.50
550.00
466.35
37.33
475.17
24.00
121.05
6,217.14
20.00
766.00
249.98
900.00
52.87
30.00
1,115.48
917.76
7,863.00
15.00
4,447.49
80.24
179.85
16,704.56
476.24
39.90
37.33
136.49
375.00
34.53
5,827.50
325.00
9,128.53
1,328.00
17.41
56.42
22.04
27.50
1,272.50
46.00
5,271.26
27.18
1,673.45
52.40
15.00
28.00
•
7
CHECK
NUMBER
0329325
O 329326
0329327
O 329328
0329329
0329330
0329331
O 329332
0329333
O 329334
0329335
O 329336
O 329337
0329338
O 329339
0329340
0329341
0329342
0329343
0329344
0329345
0329346
0329347
0329348
0329349
0329350
0329351
0329352
0329353
0329354
0329355
0329356
0329357
O 329358
0329359
0329360
0329361
O 329362
0329363
0329364
0329365
0329366
0329367
O 329368
0329369
0329370
0329371
O 329372
O 329373
0329374
O 329375
0329376
0329377
0329378
O 329379
0329380
0329381
NAME
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
VERO
ORTHOPAEDICS
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
BEARING & BOLT
HERITAGE, INC
BLUEPRINT AND SUPPLY
VON HOLTZBRINCK PUBLISHING
WAL-MART
WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WEISS RATINGS, INC
WHEELED COACH INDUSTRIES INC
WALKER, KEITH
W C G, INC
WILSON, STEVEN
WRIGHT, LAUREL
WASTE PRO
WILLIAMS, BELINDA
WILLIAMSON, JAMES
WALTON, ALAN
WARD, MARY
WILSON, GWENN
XEROX CORPORATION
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZORC, R & SONS BUILDERS INC
ZIEGLER, JULIE
JOHNSON, LETISHA D
ANDERSON, FRED
ALL FLORIDA REALTY SRVS, INC
BROXTON, LYDIA
BAXTER, JERE L
BEUTTELL, PETER M
BILKEN GROUP
BELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
BOUYSSOU, STEPHANE H
BREVARD COUNTY HOUSING
BROWN, HUBERT
BABCOCK, DEAN
BROWN, KIMBERLY AND FPL
CORR, RHODA L
C P E ASSOCIATES
CAPAK, GERALD T
CARONE, PAUL
CAPPELLUTI, RICHARD
CARLUCCI, LEONARD A
DOVE, E WILSON
DOYLE, CHERYL
DEEHAN, WILLIAM F
DESRUISSEAUX, N ROB
EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
EVANS, ALFRED
FOGERTY, GEORGE A
FORD, ROBERT J
GASKILL, ROBERT
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD
GRACE'S LANDING LTD
GULF STREAM PROPERTIES
HOLM, LEO
pUMflpTV
September 3, 2002
24
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,077.00
250.00
28.05
873.51
237.20
152.44
170.29
402.50
426.10
195.95
224.36
405.00
76,238.75
74.67
37.33
1,002.24
250.00
300.00
500.00
67.90
406.92
256.66
55.89
1,000.00
218.01
594.00
258.00
4,971.00
232 00
275.00
278.00
736.00
230.00
176.00
2,378.95
887.00
232.00
18.00
245.00
5,656.00
227.00
372.00
395.00
392.00
426.00
292.00
304.00
385.00
349.00
267.00
288.00
388.00
282.00
7,923.00
8,425.00
298.00
410.00
•
CHECK
NUMBER
0329382
O 329383
0329384
O 329385
0329386
0329387
0329388
0329389
0329390
0329391
0329392
0329393
O 329394
0329395
O 329396
0329397
0329398
0329399
O 329400 N
O 329401 0
0329402 P
O 329403 2
O 329404 P
0329405 RE
0329406 RA
0329407 RI
0329408 ST
0329409 SC
0329410 ST
0329411 SAN
0329412 SHE
0329413 ST
0329414 ST
0329415 SU
0329416 TO
0329417 TED
0329418 THE
0329419
0329420
0329421
0329422
0329423
0329424
0329425
0329426
0329427
0329428
0329429
0329430
NAME
HUNLEY, J MICHAEL
HODGES, GINA
HUITRON, GLORIA
JULIN, PAUL
JACKOWSKI, MICHAEL
JONES, ALpHONSO
KNOWLES, MARK OR ANNA
LAWRENCE, TERRY A
LANGLEY, PHILIP G
LLERENA, EDWARD D
LINDSEY GARDEN'S APARTMENTS
LAPPERT, ANN OR RONALD
LEIFER, BRUCE
LEWIS, CHARLES
M 0 D INVESTMENTS
MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM
MALGERIA, PRISCILLA
MEAD, THOMAS H OR HELEN S
ORMAN, DOUGLAS OR BARBARA
RANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND
ALMER TRAILER PARK
IERSON, JOHN H DBA
ALUMBO, LOUIS
AGAN, WILLIE C
UDENBUSH, ERNEST
VER PARK PLACE
FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEA
ROGGS, BETTY DAVIS
DART HOUSING AUTHORITY
DY PINES
LION, ROBERT L
ARCK, MICHAEL R
RIBLING, WILLIAM JR
NDMAN, IVAN
WN & COUNTRY LEASING
DIE TRUST, THE
RIEN, RICHARD C
ULISKY, WILLIAM B AND
VERO FIRST CORPORATION
VALENTINO, ANTHONY E
WILLIAMS, IVEY
BLAKE, SALLIE (WYNN)
WALTERS, KEVIN
WOODIN, RICHARD
WILLIAMS, EDITH
WESSENDORF, FRED
WOODS OF VERO BEACH
YORK, LILLY B
YORK, DAVID
September 3, 2002
25
CHECK
DATE
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CH 2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
2002-08-22
CHECK
AMOUNT
481.00
306.00
240.00
386.00
795.00
308.00
255.00
182.00
845.00
323.00
10,664.00
307.00
521.00
266.00
995.00
234.00
431.00
330.00
372.00
906.59
277.00
308.00
573.00
695.00
292.00
10,243.00
3,013.00
308.00
424.59
6,660.00
205.00
383.00
275.00
371.00
246.00
700.00
307.00
37.00
729.00
355.00
128.00
314.00
344.00
378.00
237.00
309.00
10,549.00
249.00
408.00
1,097,909.43
b11 • La 4.
•
7. D. Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC) -Appointment
of Kathleen Coley to Fill Seat Vacated by Arline Westfahl
The Board reviewed a memorandum of September 3, 2002:
To:
Date:
Subject:
From. Ruth M. Stanbridge
Commissioner
Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
September 3, 2002
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER AT LARGE TO THE
HISTORIC RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HRAC)
I would like to recommend the appointment of Kathleen Coley to serve as an At Large member
on the Historic Resources Advisory Committee. Kathleen would be filling the vacancy of Arline
Westfahl, who recently moved from our area.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
appointment of Kathleen Coley to the Historic Resources
Advisory Committee, as recommended in the memorandum.
7.E. Certification of the Tax Roll Prior to Conclusion of VAB
Hearings
The Board reviewed a memorandum of August 21, 2002:
September 3, 2002
•
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
i
FROM: Charles W. Sembler, Tax Collecto
SUBJECT: Consent Agenda Item
DATE: August 21, 2002
Please place the following on the Consent Agenda for the Board of County
Commissioners meeting on September 3, 2002.
The Property Appraiser has informed us that the Value Adjustment Board Hearings have
been scheduled for October 9, 10, 11`h and 23rd. Due to these dates it may be necessary
to certify the tax roll without the VAB hearings being concluded. Pursuant to Florida
Statutes 197.323 (see attached excerpt), we are requesting that the Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners order the roll to be extended prior to the completion of
the Value Adjustment Board hearings. The statute gives the Board this authority if
completion of the hearings would otherwise be the only cause for a delay in the issuance
of tax notices beyond November 1. We affirm this to be the truth to the best of our
knowledge and belief.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and if you have any questions or if we can be
of any assistance, please call me at ext 1395.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously ordered the tax roll
to be extended prior to the completion of the Value Adjustment
Board hearings, as requested by the Tax Collector and as
provided in Sec. 197.323 FSS.
7. F. Extension of Site Plan Approval for Commercial Plaza Known
as Sciara Commercial Development Requested by McCain &
Associates, Inc.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 19, 2002:
September 3, 2002
•
27
0 'i
TO:
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP
TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
9,41
_ /J
• 461/Robert M. Keating,IkI� CP
P
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan BolinCP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy,AICPA
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 19, 2002
SUBJECT: McCain & Associates, Inc.'s Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval for
Commercial Plaza Known as Sciara Commercial Development
(SP -MA -01-10-71/2001030153)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 3, 2002.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
On September 13, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted major site plan approval
to construct a restaurant and retail complex located on the south side of S.R 60 immediately east
of Rex T.V. and backing up to the Main Relief Canal The current expiration date of the site
plan approval is September 13, 2002.
On July 29, 2002, the project applicant filed a request to extend the site plan approval expiration
date. The applicant indicated that the delay in construction is associated with project permitting
difficulties. Pursuant to site plan regulations, the extension request may be considered by the
Board of County Commissioners because the request was submitted prior to the approval
expiration date.
ANALYSIS:
Although the LDRs have been amended since the time of project review and approval, the
members of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that subsequent amendments as
applied to the subject project are not significant enough to require substantial revisions or
redesign of the project. All TRC staff members have recently approved the applicant's request
for site plan extension.
As allowed under provisions of the TDRs, the developer is requesting a full one year extension
of the site plan approval expiration date. Pursuant to Chapter 914 of the LDRs, the Board of
County Commissioners may deny, approve, or approve with additional conditions the requested
site plan extension. Staff has no objections to the Board granting the request since the previously
approved site plan and corresponding approval conditions substantially confoini to existing LDR
requirements.
September 3, 2002
28
•
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for a one-year
extension of the conditional site plan approval for the Sciara Commercial Development with all
original approval conditions to remain in effect The new site plan approval expiration date will
be September 13, 2003.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Request Letter
2. Location Map
3. Site Plan
4. List of Approval Conditions
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
request for a one-year extension of the conditional site plan
approval for the Sciara Commercial Development with all
original approval conditions to remain in effect, as
recommended in the memorandum. The new site plan approval
expiration date will be September 13, 2003.
7.G. Approval of Annual 2002 SHIP (State Housing Initiatives
Partnership) Program Reports
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 14. 2002:
TO: James E Chandler
County Administrator
LJEPA MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
:. -- - -
`R Bert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director i
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICPA
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: August 14, 2002
September 3, 2002
29
61(
L_7
•
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 2002 SHIP PROGRAM
ANNUAL REPORTS
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 3 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On April 6, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Local
Housing Assistance Plan (Ordinance #93-13). By adopting the plan and subsequently receiving
Florida Housing Finance Corporation approval of the plan, Indian River County became eligible to
receive State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program funds.
The purpose of the SHIP program is to provide affordable housing for qualified households. As
structured, the county s SHIP Program provides low interest, deferred payment, subordinated loans
to eligible very low income low income, and moderate income households. Most of these loans
provide downpayment and closing cost and rehabilitation assistance with private financial
institutions providing principal mortgages.
The following table indicates the SHIP allocations and number of loans given to eligible applicants
by fiscal year and by income category.
SHIP PROGRAM REPORT
AMOUNT OF
SHIP FUNDING
(state funding
only)
# OF LOANS AND % OF LOANS APPROVED
APPROVED BY INCOME CATEGORY
VLI % LI % MI
4-95
95-96
96-97
7-98
$ 250,000.00 41
$ 250,000.00 37
$ 250,000.00 30
$ 565,773.00 58
$ 632,136.00 74
$ 622,455.00
13 31.71 17 41.66 11 26.83
12 32.4318 48.65 7 18.92
11 36.6713 43.33 6 20.00
19 32.76 35 60.34 4 6,90
35 47.30 34 45.95 5 6.76
65 22 33.85 36 55.38 7 10.77
$ 903,723.00
35.94 37 57.81 4 6.25
9-2000
$ 749,773.00
19 42.22 21 46.67 5 11.11
2000-01
001-02 YTD
$1,205,592.00
$1,023,335.00
1$7,617,798.00 1537
VLI:
LI:
MI:
September
Very Low Income
Low Income
Moderate Income
3, 2002
•
The table below indicates the number of loans foreclosed and the number of loans repaid. Funds
from repaid loans are deposited in the Housing Trust Fund and subsequently provided to other
applicants.
SHIP Program Loan Foreclosures or Repayments
Total number of loans
granted
Foreclosure Action
Loan Repayments
Number
% of Total
Number
% of Total
573 (as of 7/25/02)
9
1.68
49
9.12
As per the requirements of the SHIP Program, the county must submit an annual report for each
fiscal year for which SHIP funds have been used. These reports must be signed by the Chairman of
the Board of County Commissioners or his designee. The closeout reports for FY 1992-93, FY
1993-94, FY 1994-95, FY 1995-96, FY 1996-97, FY 1997-98, FY 98-99, and FY 99-2000 were
previously submitted to the state. Attached to this staff report are the county's SHIP Program FY
2000-01 and FY 2001-02 annual reports. The SHIP annual report for FY 2000-2001 is a close-out
report. These reports must be submitted to the state by September 15 2002.
ANALYSIS
According to state regulations, SHIP funds must be utilized in such a manner that all state
requirements and all requirements of the county's Local Housing Assistance Program are met.
Among the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP) requirements are the following:
• At Least 30% of funds must be utilized by very low income (VLI) households
• At least 30% of funds must be utilized by low income (LI) households
• At least 65% of funds must be utilized for homeownership
• At least 75% of funds must be utilized for construction, rehabilitation and emergency repair
• Not more than 10% of funds can be utilized for administration costs
In administering the SHIP program, the county has met all of these requirements as well as local
requirements for homeownership, credit, employment, assets and others.
These annual reports have been distributed to members of the county's Affordable Housing Advisory
Committee, the Affordable Housing Partnership Group, municipalities, Treasure Coast Builders
Association and other interested persons for their review and comment.
The purpose of this staff report is to request that the Board of County Commissioners review the
attached Annual SHIP reports and authorize the Chairman to sign the SHIP annual reports for fiscal
year 2000-2001 and fiscal year 2001-2002.
ALTERNATIVES
The Board of County Commissioners has two alternatives with respect to the SHIP Annual Report.
These are:
September 3, 2002
31
u;
•
• To approve the attached SHIP Annual Report and direct staff to submit the report to the
Florida Housing Finance Corporation.
■ Not to approve the attached SHIP Annual Report. Choosing the second alternative, however,
would cause the county to become ineligible to receive additional SHIP funds
Staff supports the first alternative.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached SHIP Annual
reports and authorize the Chairman to sign the reports.
Attachments:
1. SHIP Annual Report for FY 2000-2001 (close out report)
2. SHIP Annual Report for FY 2001-2002 (active report)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the SHIP
Annual Reports and authorized the Chairman to execute same,
as recommended in the memorandum.
COPIES OF REPORTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.H. Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 16, 2002:
TO:
FROM: 1
DATE:
SUBJECT:
hoard of County Commissioners
Marian E. Fell, Assistant County Attorney
August 16, 2002
Payments to Vendors of Court Related Costs
The Office of the County Attorney has processed and approved payment to the following vendors for the weeks
July 29, 2002 through August 12, 2002. Listed below are the vendors and the amount of each court -related cost.
VENDOR:
Donna Speirs
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Janet C. Prosper
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Janet C. Prosper
September 3, 2002
PAYMENT TYPE:
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
32
AMOUNT:
31.50
52.50
31.50
32.50
42.00
•
•
Martin Co. Clerk
Court Administrator Dakota Co.
American Reporting
Victor Perez
Saloi D Gagel
Kerr & Associates
American Reporting
Federal Express
Janet C. Prosper
Madge A. Bradford
Madge A. Bradford
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Madge A. Bradford
Maria E Barrow
Maria E. Barrow
Madge A. Bradford
Patricia B. Held
Madge A. Bradford
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
James T. Long, Esq.
Fred H, Petrilla, Ph D
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Suncoast Counseling
Gregory C. Landrum, Psy.D.
Jeffrey L. Benoit, Ph.D.
Suncoast Counseling
Salol Gagel
Medical Record Services
Medical Record Services
Global Translation/Interpretation
Unishippers
ABC Printing
Atlantic Reporting
Myra A. Eldridge
DMV Record Service
Unishippers
Unishippers
American Reporting
Alma Rosa Sanas
Suncoast Counseling
Suncoast Counseling
Saloi D. Gagel
Patricia B. Held
Salol D. Gagel
Donna Speirs
Myra A. Eldridge
Debby Thomas
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Marcia Geisler-Steiner
Federal Express
ABC Printing
Indian River Office Center
Janet C. Prosper
Myra A. Eldridge
Donna Speirs
Myra A. Eldridge
Patricia B. Held
Hammond & Smith, P.A.
Donald W. Ginn
Cristi Martin
Linda Seymoure
Cristi Martin
Cristi Martin
September 3, 2002
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Transcription (SAO)
Interpreter (PDO)
Interpreter (PDO)
Transcription (SAO)
Transcription (SAO)
State Attorney Costs
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Court Interpreter (Order)
Court Interpreter (Order)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Public Defender Conflicts(Misd.)
Public Defender Conflicts(Juv.)
Public Defender Conflicts(Felony)
Clinical Evaluation (PDO)
Clinical Evaluation (PDO)
Clinical Evaluation (PDO)
Clinical Evaluation (SAO)
Clinical Evaluation (PDO)
Clinical Evaluation (PDO)
Court Interpreter (Order)
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Court Interpreter (Order)
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Transcription (SAO)
Transcription (SAO)
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Transcription (SAO)
Court Interpreter (SAO)
Clinical Evaluation (PDO)
Clinical Evaluation (PDO)
Court Interpreter (PDO)
Transcription (SAO)
Court Interpreter (PDO)
Transcription (PDC)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Public Defender Costs
State Attorney Costs
State Attorney Costs
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (SAO)
Indigent Dependency Cases (23)
Witness Coordination (Order)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
Transcription (PDO)
33
2.00
20.00
15.00
25.00
20.00
104.55
21.00
5.51
52.50
17.50
45.50
38.50
63.00
37.50
31.25
161.00
378.00
101.50
300.00
600.00
9,000.00
500.00
675.00
562.50
675.00
1,050.00
537.50
20.00
47.35
112.47
260.00
16.89
30.80
55.11
77.00
3.00
26.60
20.60
45.00
50.00
550.00
550.00
30.00
94.50
40.00
56.00
157.50
504.00
35.00
42.00
21.85
9.80
14.57
182.00
28.00
98.00
182.00
94.50
21,250.00
57.14
70.00
385.00
108.50
77.00
BSC
1
•
•
Patricia B. Held
Flinn Court Reporting
Patricia B. Held
Atlantic Reporting
Victor Perez
Total
Transcription (SAO)
Transcription (SAO)
Transcription (SAO)
Transcription (SAO)
Court Interpreter (PDO)
NO ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN.
52.50
107.00
66.50
59.00
25.00
$40,941.49
7.L Harris, Cotherman & Associates, Amendment to Independent
Audit Contract
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 2002
To:
D ate:
S ubject:
Through:
From:
Members of the Board of County Commissioners
August 27, 2002
Independent Audit Contract with
Harris, Cotherman & Associates — Contract Amendment
Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Admi
Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager
D escriptions And Conditions
1
iisstrator� '
k f t(
O n October 10, 2000, the Board of Commissioners approved a contract with Harris, Cotherman &
Associates for audit services for fiscal years 1999/2000 through 2003/2004. The State of Florida
Auditor General recently made two substantial changes to the audit requirements for local
governments effective beginning fiscal year 2000/2001. As a result of these changes, auditors must
perform a financial condition assessment of the entity being audited. The second requirement is the
new Florida Single Audit Act, which replaces the previous audit requirement for state grants and aids.
Each of these new requirements results in a significant amount of additional workload for the
completion of the audit. The contract may be amended to account for such changes resulting from
new legislation. Staff has negotiated an additional fee of $8,000 for these services each year for the
remainder of the contract (fiscal year 2000/2001 through 2003/2004). An amendment to the contract
is attached for consideration by the Board of Commissioners.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Board of Commissioners approve the attached contract amendment for
additional services required by the State of Florida Auditor General. This amendment provides
additional compensation of $8,000 per year for the remainder of the contract.
Attachments
Letter from Harris, Cotherman & Assoc.,
Dated August 26, 2002
Contract Amendment
September 3, 2002
34
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
contract amendment for additional services required by the State
of Florida Auditor General, providing an additional
compensation of $8,000 per year for the remainder of the
contract with Harris, Cotherman & Associates, as recommended
in the memorandum.
AMENDMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.J. Resolution No. 2002-061 Traffic Signal Maintenance and
Compensation - Minor Revision to Previously Approved Joint
Participation Agreement (JPA) with the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P E
Public Works Director
FROM: Christopher R. Mora, P E
County Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Minor Revisions to Previously - Approved
Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) with the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) for:
Traffic Signal Maintenance and Compensation
DATE: August 27, 2002
September 3, 2002
•
35
DX
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The FDOT has prepared a joint participation agreement (JPA), between the FDOT and Indian River
County, to allow the County to begin receiving funding from the FDOT for routine maintenance of
the County -operated traffic signal system. The JPA will initially provide for $19,252 in funds in FY
2002/2003, with increased funding in subsequent years.
The original agreement, which was approved by the Board on June 18, 2002, has been revised by the
FDOT.
The new agreement provides the County with more freedom to adjust traffic signal timing, and
reduces County liability through removal of the indemnification provision.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The attached JPA is a standard agreement similar to many agreements the County has executed in the
past. The alternatives are as follows:
Alternative No. 1
Approved the JPA and authorize the Board of County Commissioners Chairman's signature,
on the JPA and authorizing resolution.
Alternative No. 2
Deny approval of the JPA and cancel the project.
RECOMMENDATIONS & FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 — approval of the JPA. There is no funding impact generated by
this project.
ATTACHMENT
Two (2) Copies of the JPA and Resolution
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2002-061 authorizing a Joint Participation
Agreement for Traffic Signal Maintenance and Compensation.
September 3, 2002
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
36
V
Lilt
r fn
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 061
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING A JOINT
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENAI\ CE
AND COMPENSATION
WHEREAS, it is a policy of the State of Florida to construct and make improvements to the
state transportation system in a cooperative partnership; and
WHEREAS, such partnership shall be encouraged through the joint funding of projects that
improve traffic flow and reduce congestion on the State Highway System, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County wishes to
authorize the Chairman of the Commission to enter into a Joint Participation Agreement with the
State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) on behalf of the Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT:
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida hereby authorize the
Chairman of the Commission to enter into a Joint Participation Agreement with the State of Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) for:
1. The FDOT shall fund the project cost, as detailed in Exhibits A and B of the Traffic
Signal Maintenance and Compensation Agreement. The Board authorizes the
County Traffic Engineer to annually prepare, update and submit Exhibit A to the
FDOT for compensation.
2. The County shall maintain and operate the traffic signal system. If the project cost
exceeds the amount shown in Exhibits A and B, the County shall pay the overage.
September 3, 2002
37
n
-
iru
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 061
The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner Adams and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Gi nn , and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
September ,2002.
Attest: J. K. Barton, Clerk
BY:) zQ Y ' 4&?
Deputy Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: (7' 42.
Ruth M. Stanbridge
Chairman
September 3, 2002
Indian River County
Approved
Date
Administratim
�� �
�..�{Y.�
Budget
//`J7y/4,
Legal
L c
r-/L_/i
Risk Management
¢.�_
Oy(8 '18-01
Public Works
;Ik1*-
Traffic Engineering
8�7Z
September 3, 2002
7.K. FORMUNIS Software Agreement - MUNIS - BMI Asset
Tracking
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 28, 2002:
DATE: AUGUST 28, 2002
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THROUGH: JOSEPH A BAIRD, ASSISTANT COLJNT'Y ADMINISTRATOR &� i )
FROM: ED FRY, FINANCE DIRECTOR
-�-
JASON BROWN, BUDGET MANAGER
SUBJECT: FORMUNIS SOFTWARE AGREEMENT
BACKGROUND
In May 2002, the Board of County Commissioners authorized a software agreement with
MUNIS to provide a fully integrated financial software system. MUNIS included two third party
software applications in the software financial system. One third party application, FORMUNIS,
is for the development of foul's to be used in conjunction with the accounts payable, purchasing
and payroll applications. The second third party application, BMI Asset Tracking, is to provide
bar coding capabilities for the tracking of the county's fixed assets.
County staff has been working with FORMUNIS to develop the purchasing forms and check
formats for accounts payable and payroll. All parties have agreed on the formats and
FORMUNIS has prepared a site plan for installation of their software, a master license
agreement and the design specifications.
The site plan includes core costs that are covered by the agreement with MUNIS In addition to
the core costs, the site plan anticipates another $12,537.10 in costs for custom programming
services, a workstation for the FORMUNIS application, a laser printer for the check printing, and
blank check stock.
Staff has reviewed all of the proposed additional costs. The workstation will provide staff with
the ability to make modifications to the purchasing forms and the check formats Since the
standard forms provided by FORMUNIS did not provide some of the information that staff felt
was important, FORMUi\IS will customize their standard purchase order and standard check
formats to meet the county s needs. Staff had anticipated the need to purchase a laser printer for
printing accounts payable and payroll checks. The printer included m FORMUNIS's site plan
gives us the ability to print, sign and seal payroll checks. The check stock and the toner
cartridges are cheaper than what we are currently paying.
No additional funding will be required for the proposed costs in this agreement. The original
proposal presented to the Board included funding for hardware costs and customization services
The check stock and toner cartndges will be purchased using current operating funds.
September 3, 2002
39
,,
r 0
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan for Installation of the FORMUNIS application and
permission for Ed Fry to sign the Site Plan. Staff recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners authorize the Chair to sign the Master License Agreement. Staff requests the
signature of the Chairman and Vice -Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners on the last
page of the design specifications in order for FORMUlh IS to develop facsimile signatures.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the Site
Plan for Installation of the FORMUNIS application and
permission for Finance Director Ed Fry to sign the Site Plan,
and authorized the Chairman to sign the Master License
Agreement and on the last page of the design specifications in
order for FORMUNIS to develop facsimile signatures, as
recommended in the memorandum.
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.L. Termination of Lease with City of Vero Beach for 16th Street
Ball Field - Future Agreement with Indian River County School
Board for Parking Spaces
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 2002:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
f C.•
FROM:-'
Joseph A. Baird, Assistant County Administrator,`
DATE: August 27, 2002
SUBJECT: City of Vero Beach Terminating 16« Street Ball Field Lease
September 3, 2002
40
Li 1
ral
On September 18, 1991 the City of Vero Beach entered into a 16 year lease extension
agreement with Indian River County for the 16th Street ball field property. The City of Vero
Beach has sent formal notification of the City's desire to terminate the lease and transfer
maintenance responsibility for the 16`h Street ball field complex to the County effective
September 30, 2002.
Indian River County School Board has requested permission to use the 16th Street ball
field complex parking for their sophomore students. The request is for approximately 67 parking
spaces from the hours of 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. This should not interfere with any programs we
currently hold, therefore staff has no problem allowing the school to use the parking
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners accept the formal notification
from the City of Vero Beach terminating the lease on the 16th Street ball fields effective
September 30, 2002, and authorize staff to work on an agreement with the School Board for the
parking spaces.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously accepted
notification from the City of Vero Beach terminating the lease
on the 16th Street ball fields effective September 30, 2002, and
authorized staff to work on an agreement with the Indian River
County School Board for the parking spaces as further outlined
in the memorandum, as recommended in the memorandum.
LETTER OF TERMINATION IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.M. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment No. 017
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 23, 2002:
September 3, 2002
41
•
To: Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
Through: Joseph A. BairdAssistant County County Administrator.,__
From. Jason E Brown
Budget Manager
D ate: August 23, 2002
S ubject: Miscellaneous
Budget Amendment 017
D escription and Conditions
The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following:
1. On August 20, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved a $1,000 contribution to the
Florida Missing Children's Day Ceremonies from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund. The
attached entry appropriates funding from this source.
2. On June 18, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved a grant agreement with the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for a Shelter Plus Care program.
The attached entry appropnates funding.
3. The North County Library has received donations totaling $12,595. The attached entry
appropriates these revenues.
4. On August 20, 2002, the Board of Commissioners approved a settlement proposal with the
IAFF Local 2201 for outstanding matters in arbitration. The attached entry appropriates
funding of $30,000 from Emergency Services District contingencies.
5. On September 18, 2001, the Board of Commissioners approved an interlocal agreement with
the City of Sebastian for a boat ramp on Schumann Lake. This agreement provided for a
County contribution of $7,800 from the Florida Boating Improvement Fund. The attached
entry appropriates funding as outlined in the agreement.
6. The State of Florida has increased the local responsibility for Medicaid payments for inpatient
hospital services. As a result, Medicaid costs are exceeding the approved budget. The
attached entry appropriates funding from General Fund cash forward.
7. Legal advertising costs are exceeding the amount budgeted in the Purchasing Department.
This is due to a large amount of projects going out for bid in the current year. The attached
entry appropriates funding from General Fund contingencies.
8. The Office of Management & Budget underestimated sick incentive costs in various
departments. The attached entry appropriates funding.
9. Design and construction of a sporting clays course at the Shooting Range is currently
underway. Funding is available from the Shooting Range Construction Fund cash forward.
10. The Florida Department of Labor has invoiced the County for unemployment compensation
claims in several departments. The attached entry appropriates funding.
September 3, 2002
42
du
11. The Recreation Department has experienced higher than expected enrollment in the summer
camp programs this year. As a result, revenues and expenditures are exceeding their
estimates. The attached entry appropriates the use of the additional funds.
12. The attached entry transfers the appropriate additional funds to Fleet Management from
various departments.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Budget
Amendment 017, as recommended in the memorandum.
To: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
From. Jason E. Brown
Budget Manager /{
Entry
Number
Budget Amendment: 017
Date: September 3, 2002
Account Number
Increase Decrease
Law Enforcement Trust Fund/
Confiscated Property
Expenses
Law Enforcement Trust Fund /
Sheriff / Law Enforcement
112-000-351-020.00
112-600-586-099.04
$1,000 $0
Revenues
State & Federal Grant Fund/ HUD
Shelter Plus Care Grant
Expenses
136-000-331-621.00
$90,780 $0
State & Federal Grant Fund/
Rental Assistance Payments
136-165-564-036.73
$90,780 $0
September 3, 2002
Revenues
001-000-366-097.00
$12,595
Expenses
General Fund/ North County
Library/ Office Supplies
General Fund/ North County
Library/ Youth Audiovisual
001-112-571-035.11
001-112-571-038.14
Optional Sales Tax/ North County
Library Expansion
Expenses
315-112-571-066.29
$12,132
Emergency Services District/
Tuition & Registration
Emergency Services District/
Other Professional Services
Emergency Services District/
Reserve for Contingencies
114-120-522-035.43
$15,000
114-120-522-033.19
$15,000
114-120-522-099.91
$30,000
Revenues
Florida Boating Improvement
Fund/ FBIP Shared Revenues
Expenses
133-000-335-701.00
Florida Boating Improvement
Fund/ City of Sebastian
Expenses
133-210-572-088.52
001-111-564-033.17
$115,000
001-111-564-033.18
$25,000
General Fund/ Cash Forward
001-199-581-099.92
$140,000
Expenses
001-216-513-034.91
General Fund/ Reserve for
Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
September 3, 2002
September 3, 2002
8.
Expenses
General Fund/ County Attorney/
Sick Incentive$0
001-102-514-011.15
$2,527
General Fund/ Recreation/ Sick
Incentive
001-108-572-011.15
$1,233
$0
General Fund/ County
Administration/ Sick Incentive
001-201-512-011.15
$740
$0
General Fund/ Animal Control/
Sick Incentive
001-250-562-011.15
$1,304
$0
General Fund/ Cash Forward
001-199-581-099.92
$0
$5,804
Transportation Fund/ Traffic
Engineering/ Sick Incentive
111-245-541-011.15
$503
$0
Transportation Fund/ Reserve for
Contingencies
111-199-581-099.91
$0
$503
9.
Revenues
Shooting Range Construction/
Cash Forward — October 1
312-000-389 040.00
$30,000
$0
Expenses
Shooting Range Construction/
Construction In Progress$0
312-108-575-066.51
$30,000
10.
Expenses
General Fund/ Purchasing/
Unemployment Compensation
001-216-513-012.15
$915
$0
General Fund/ Building &
Grounds/ Unemployment
001-220-519-012.15
$752
$0
General Fund/ Reserve for
Contingencies
001-199-581-099.91
$0
$1,667
Transportation
Bridge/ Unemployment
Fund/ Road &
111-214-541-012.15
$1,500
$0
Transportation Fund/ Engineering/
Unemployment Compensation
111-244-541-012.15
$4,500
$0
Transportation Fund/ Reserve for
Contingencies
111-199-581-099.91
$0
$6,000
11.
Revenues
General Fund/ Summer Camp
User Fees
001-000-347-212.00
$22,000
$0
Expenses
General Fund/ Recreation/
Summer Camp Expenses
001-108-572-041.13
$17,500
$0
General Fund/ Recreation/
Overtime
001-108-572-011.14
$4,500
$0
September 3, 2002
Building Division/ Cash Forward
441M00-389-040.00
471-000-389-040.00
$20,000
501-000-381-020.00
$60,000
501-000-395-010.00
$60,000
Expenses
111-199-581-099.21
$12,500
111-199-581-099.92
Solid Waste Disposal District/
Fund Transfers Out
S12,500
411-217-534 099.21
411-217-534-099.92
$20,000
441-233-524-099.21
471-235-536-099.21
$20,000
501-242-591-033.49
$60,000
Fleet Management/ Parts
501-242-591-035.54
$50,000
501-242-591-036.72
7.N. HUD Contract or Grant Award FL 29B109003 - Continuum
Wide Homeless Mana s ement In ormation S stem - Service Pointe
Upgrade 2001 - Indian River Homeless Services Council, Inc.
A reement - 2001 Su ortive Housin ' Grant A ' reement New -
Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) - De
( partment
o Housin : and Urban Develo ment HUD
The Board reviewed letters of August 22 and August 28, 2002:
September 3, 2002
• •
11/4
kr G
0 1111of
lli
i*�=
e
e IN oEge•C
August 22, 2002
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Jacksonville Office
301 West Bay Street, Suite 2200
Jacksonville, Florida 32202-5121
4HDM2
Ms. Joyce Johnston -Carlson
Director, County Human Services
Indian River County
1940 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Ms. Johnston -Carlson:
SUBJECT: Transmittal of Grant Agreements
S upportive Housing Program - HMIS
P roject Number: FL29B109003
Congratulations on the final selection of your project under the Supportive
Housing Program. AH conditions attached to your award for this project have been met.
H UD's total fund obligation for this project is $108,530, allocated as follows:
H MIS dedicated Project Costs
$108,530
Enclosed are three copies of the Grant Agreement that constitutes the
agreement between you and HUD. After signing, please retain an original of the grant
agreement for your records and return the other two originals to this office within one
week.
Also enclosed are Grantee Financial Instructions in which you will find
information on completing the Direct Deposit Form, the Voice Response Access
Authorization form, and the Special Needs Assistance Programs Voucher for Grant
Payment, all of which are necessary to receive payments from HUD.
Enclosed is a copy of HUD 7015.15 and instructions for its completion. As
previously mentioned in our notification letter to you, HUD 7015.15 (Request for
Release of Funds and Certification) must be completed for each project site and
returned to the HUD Field Office. HUD may not release grant funds if the recipient or
any other part commits grant funds before the Field Office approves the Request for
Release of Funds and Certification. If the recipient is a State or unit of general local
government, then the recipient must complete all three parts of HUD 7015.15. If the
recipient is a public housing agency (PHA) or a private nonprofit organization, the
recipient must complete only part 3 of HUD -7015.15 and then only after the recipient's
responsible entity has conducted the environmental review, published the notices and
completed parts 1 and 2 of HUD 7015.15. HUD cannot release funds if the recipient or
any other party commits grant funds for activities not listed in 24 CFR 58 34 or 58.35(b)
before the Field Office approves form HUD 7015.15.
September 3, 2002
47
flti
OA
S C. s
t
You are advised that your grant cannot begin and no funds can be disbursed to
you for this project until the Grant Agreement is fully executed
Thank you for your commitment to assisting homeless persons. We look forward
to working with you to eliminate homelessness. If you have any questions, please
contact Debra L. Dye Community Planning and Development Representative on 904-
232-1777, extension 2078 or via electronic mail at Debra L. DyeQHUD.gov. We look
forward to working with you toward the successful continuation of your Supportive
Housing Program project.
Very sincerely yours,
Gary A. f? ausey
Acting Director
Community Planning and Development
INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC.
2525 St Lucie Avenue
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Irhscih@aol com
772-567-7790
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
County Administration Bldg.
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Subject: HUD Contract for Grant Award FL 29B109003
Dear Commissioners:
August 28, 2002
This letter is to request that you vote to approve the signing of the HUD Contract by
Chairman Stanbridge for a Continuum Wide Homeless Management Information System.
This contract was awarded to the Indian River Board of County Commissioners in the
2001 HUD competition. It was approved for submission to HUD by former Commission
Chairman, Caroline Ginn on May 22, 2001.
FL29B109003 will provide $108,530 to create a Homeless Management Information
System using Service Point Upgrade 2001.
The match required for this project is $27, 135.00. It is being provided by the Indian
River Homeless Service Council. The match has been secured in a designated account
and will be forwarded directly to the County's budget office. Also included for your
approval is a proposed agreement by which Indian River Homeless Services Council,
Inc., commits to funding the cash match.
Attached also for your review are copies of the required executed certifications of
consistency with the Consolidated Plan.
Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
nim 74€et,
Louise Hubbard MPA
September 3, 2002
48
n
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
Agreement with Indian River Homeless Services Council, Inc.
and the 2001 Supportive Housing Grant Agreement - Homeless
Management Information System and authorized the Chairman
to execute the same, as requested.
AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.0. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Contract for Grant Award FL 29B109002 - Family Options
Transitional Housing - 2001 Supportive Housing Grant Agreement
(New) Program Funds - Indian River Homeless Services Council,
Inc. - Homeless Assistance Center, Inc.
The Board reviewed a letter of August 28, 2002:
INDIAN RIVER HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC.
2525 St Lucie Avenue
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Irhsclh'aol.com
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
County Administration Bldg.
1840 25`x' Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
772-567-7790
Subject HUD Contract for Grant Award FL 29B109002.
Dear Commissioners: August 28, 2002
This letter is to request that you vote to approve the signing of the HUD Contract by
Chairman Stanbridge for Family Options Transitional Housing,. This contract was
awarded to. the Indian River Board of County Commissioners in the 2001 HUD
competition. It was approved for submission to HUD by former Commission Chairman,
Caroline Ginn on May 22, 2001.
September 3, 2002
49
•
Moab`
FL29B109002wi11 provide $201,191 in Supportive Housing Program Funds to provide
profession staff to the Family Options Transitional Housing Program.
The match required for this project is $52,548.00. It is being provided by the Indian River
Homeless Service Council and the Homeless Assistance Center Inc. Also included for
your approval is a proposed agreement by which Indian River Homeless Services
Council Inc., commits to funding the cash match.
Attached also for your review are copies of the required executed certifications of
consistency with the Consolidated Plan.
Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
a -d
Louise Hubbard MPA
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the HUD
Contract for Family Options Transitional Housing and
authorized the Chairman to execute same, as requested.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF 1 HE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.P. Bid #4069 - Mobile Lift Station - Utilities Department
Wastewater Treatment Division - Thompson Pump & Mfg. Co.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2002:
DALE.: August 15, 2002
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOI`-ERS
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services, Director
Erik Olson, Utilities Department, Director
September 3, 2002
50
•
FROM:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager
Indian River County Bid # 4069 Mobile Lift Station
Utilities Department / Wastewater Treatment Division
The Utilities Department has requested the purchase of a sound attenuated vac -assist trash pump.
The bid results are as follows:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specification s requested by:
Replies:
BID TABULATION:
June 19, 2002 at 2:00 pm
June 5 and 12, 2002
Three Hundred Thirty One (331) vendors
Thirty Two (32) vendors
Five (5) vendor
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID.
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMMENDATION:
$24,000.00
$25,995.00*
See attached memo from Budget Office.
471-268-536-066.49
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Thompson Pump and Manufacturing Company,
Inc as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth
in the Invitation to Bid.
September 3, 2002
51
.3
t
•
•
Vendor
Amount
1
Thompson Pump & Mfg Co
Port Orange FL
$25,995.00
2
ABS Pumps
Sanford FL
$27,140.00
3
Apex Pinnacle
Port Crane NY
$28,746.00
4
Acme Dynamics Inc
Plant City FL
$29,000.00
5
Ellis K Phelps & Co
Riviera Beach FL
$34,900.00
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID.
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMMENDATION:
$24,000.00
$25,995.00*
See attached memo from Budget Office.
471-268-536-066.49
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Thompson Pump and Manufacturing Company,
Inc as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth
in the Invitation to Bid.
September 3, 2002
51
.3
t
•
•
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
X4069 to Thompson Pump & Mfg. Co., in the amount of
$25,995.00, as recommended in the memorandum.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
WHEN PROVIDED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
74 Q. Bid #4077 - Sodium Hypochlorite Metering Pump - Utilities
Department Wastewater Treatment Division M. Florida Water
Processing
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 15, 2002:
DALE:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
August 15, 2002
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas Frame, General Services, Director Lbrace)( .,.u-r---te
Erik Olson, Utilities Department, Director
Fran Powell, Purchasing Manager 4 ,lirl
,/f'
Indian River County Bid # 4077 Sodium Hypochlorite Metering Pump
Utilities Department / Wastewater Treatment Division
1
The Utilities Department has requested the purchase of three Sodium Hypochlorite meter pumps.
These pumps shall be installed at the West Regional WWTF. The bid results are as follows:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertising Dates:
DemandStar Broadcast to:
Specification's requested by:
Replies:
September 3, 2002
July 22, 2002 at 2:00 pm
July 3 and 10, 2002
Three Hundred Twelve (312) vendors
Thirty Five (35) vendors
Two (2) vendor
52
Eli
f-
BID TABULATION:
ESTIMATED BUDGET. $7,609.68
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID' $7,609.68
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 472-000-169-500.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Florida Water Processing as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#4077 to Florida Water Processing, in the amount of $7,609.68,
as recommended in the memorandum.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
WHEN PROVIDED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
8.A. JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT -
INVESTMENT REPORT AND AMENDMENT TO INVESTMENT
POLICY (TO CHANGE THE BENCHMARK)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 28, 2002:
September 3, 2002
53
ER
•
Vendor
Amount
Quantity
Total
Amount
Completion Time
Delivery
Time
Installation
Time
1.
Florida Water Processing
Ft Lauderdale, FL
$2,536.56
3 ea.
$7,609.68
10 days
20 days
2.
Lucas Technologies Inc
Ormond Beach, FL
! $938.50
3 ea.
$2815.50
12-16
days
Not
Installed
*Note: This bid is incomplete
and does not meet the specifications.
Does not include
installation
ESTIMATED BUDGET. $7,609.68
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID' $7,609.68
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 472-000-169-500.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Florida Water Processing as the lowest most
responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#4077 to Florida Water Processing, in the amount of $7,609.68,
as recommended in the memorandum.
BID DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
WHEN PROVIDED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
8.A. JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT -
INVESTMENT REPORT AND AMENDMENT TO INVESTMENT
POLICY (TO CHANGE THE BENCHMARK)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 28, 2002:
September 3, 2002
53
ER
•
TO: THE HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: AUGUST 28, 2002
SUBJECT: INVESTMENT REPORT
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT C
BACKGROUND
The Investment Advisory Committee met to review the investment activities conducted by the
Clerk's Finance Department for the quarter starting April 1, 2002 and ending June 30, 2002.
Attached to this memorandum is the Investment Committee Report for the investment activities of
the Clerk's Finance Department for April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002. Additional information
concerning the composition of the investment portfolio and investment earnings is included as part
of the report
•
During the Investment Advisory Committee meeting, a discussion ensued concerning the benchmark
in the Investment Policy. The current benchmark is the 91 day T -Bill. The Investment Advisory
Committee decided that a one year benchmark would be more appropriate and is recommending that
the benchmark be changed to the one year Treasury.
RECOMMENDATION
Amend the Investment Policy to change the benchmark from the 91 day T-bill bond equivalent yield
to the one year Treasury bond equivalent yield.
Clerk of Circuit Court Jeffrey K. Barton reviewed the above memorandum and
requested the Board to amend the Investment Policy by changing the benchmark from the
91 -day T-bill bond equivalent yield to the one-year Treasury bond equivalent yield as
recommended by the Investment Advisory Committee.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously amended the
Investment Policy to change the benchmark from the 91 -day T-
bill bond equivalent yield to the one-year Treasury bond
equivalent yield, as recommended by the Investment Advisory
Committee.
September 3, 2002
54
ER
•
8.B. JIM EGAN - MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL
MOVED TO 9.B.2.
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING - RECONSIDERATION OF GRAVES
BROTHERS INC.'S REQUEST TO ABANDON A PORTION OF OLD
DIXIE HIGHWAY LOCATED NORTH OF C.R.510 AND SOUTH OF
U.S.#1 (Legislative)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of August 22, 2002 using
an aerial photo of the area He stated that Planning staff continues to recommend denial of
the request to abandon and advised that no agreement has been reached by the Fenders and
Mr. Graves as to the loss of one access to the Fender's property if the abandonment is
granted. He noted that Public Works staff recommended approval because of the right-of-
way offer and the offer to make some traffic changes in the area.
TO: James E Chandler
County Administrator
DE
MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development irector
THROUGH: Stan Bolin
ICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP,X.V,
Senior Planner, Current Development
/111/9,7
D
DATE: August 22, 2002
SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Graves Brothers Inc.'s Request to Abandon a
Portion of Old Dixie Located North of C.R. 510 and South of U.S 1
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board
of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 3, 2002.
September 3, 2002
55
Vi►
•
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
At its regular meeting of August 6, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners considered
the above referenced request and tabled further consideration to the August 20, 2002
Board meeting. The Board tabled the request to provide time for the applicant to work-
out an access issue with an adjacent property owner (Mr and Mrs. Fender) and to provide
a written agreement which would spell -out the applicant s commitments for various items
if the Board grants the request.
After the August 6th meeting, the applicant discovered that there would not be a full
Board at the August 20`h meeting and asked to have the request re -heard at the September
3, 2002 Board meeting. Staff agreed, notified the Fenders and re -advertised for a public
hearing on September 3`d. The delay has given the applicant more time to coordinate
with the Fenders and supply staff with a letter of agreement.
The Board is now to reconsider and act on the request in a public hearing.
ANALYSIS:
Planning staff's analysis and recommendation remain the same as contained in the staff
report for the August 6th Board meeting (see attachment #1). Subsequent to the August
6`h meeting, the applicant met with the Fenders' attorney to resolve issues regarding
access to the Fender property. As of the writing of this report, the parties have not yet
resolved these access issues. However, the applicant has indicated a willingness to
provide "Old Dixie" access from C.R. 510 to the Fender property, if the Old Dixie
Highway right-of-way is abandoned.
In addition, the applicant continues to commit to items described at the August 6`h
meeting, namely: the C.R. 510 and U.S. 1 right-of-way dedication/swap, the U.S. 1/85th
Place median modification, and removal and restriping of the northern portion of Old
Dixie. The applicant has now provided a letter of agreement outlining these
commitments, which are contingent upon approval of the nght-of-way abandonment
request. That letter, along with a copy of the right-of-way deeds now held in escrow, are
attached (see attachments #2 & 3).
SUMMARY:
Planning staff continues to recommend that the Board deny the applicant's request for the
reasons in the original staff report. Those reasons are that granting the abandonment
would result in loss of a historic resource, and elimination of a southbound access from
U.S. 1 to the rear of the Fender property which the Fenders still object to at this time. It
should be noted that planning staff's position differs from that of Public Works, which
supports the abandonment request subject to the right-of-way and traffic improvement
commitments.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners deny
the request to abandon its rights to the subject right-of-way.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report for the August 6, 2002 Board Meeting
2. Applicants Agreement/Letter of Commitments
3. Copy of Deeds Currently Held in Escrow
September 3, 2002
56
Commissioner Adams understood that Planning staff still recommends denial and
Commissioner Macht commented that the Board is not precluded from making an access
available to the Fender property from the back side of the property.
Director Boling agreed and explained that the County can, on any type of
abandonment request, retain rights including public access rights as had been discussed at
the August 6th meeting.
Chairman Stanbridge noted there is a drainage problem there, and Public Works
Director James Davis described the route of a drainage pipe which runs beneath the FEC
Railroad just north of CR 510, through the Graves' property and the packing house area,
and then to the east. Director Davis added that staff had found no record of an easement
where that drainage pipe currently exists.
Chairman Stanbridge pointed out there would be no way to solve the drainage
problem if the easement is abandoned.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Richard Graves, 1015 34th Avenue, Vero Beach, Chief Executive Officer of Graves
Brothers, summarized a few details for the Board. The abandonment of this is recommended
by Public Works because of the non -conforming intersection at US# 1 and CR510. Also the
Department of Transportation recommends and approves ofthe abandonment because ofthe
non -conforming exit off US# 1. The US# 1 /CR510 intersection has been improved to
provide for this abandonment. He believed this segment of Old Dixie Highway has little,
if any, historic significance. It is not part of the County's Thoroughfare Plan. Accident rates
are high The Sheriff recommends abandonment for safety reasons. The County would gain
usable right-of-way for meeting future commitments in the Comprehensive Plan. He met
September 3, 2002
57
F)
L3► 1
•
{� •c •73
with the Fender's representatives as directed at the last meeting and offered them the right
of ingress and egress across the Grave's property on an exchange basis. Concerning
drainage, he advised that Graves had purchased all the property from Deerfield Groves about
15-18 years ago. There was an existing drain pipe on the property that carried water from
the west of the FEC Railroad down the south side of CR510; on the west side of the tracks
it comes north under CR510, then under the tracks, and then goes into a pipe under that
property and empties somewhere out toward US/11. Some of that pipe has collapsed in the
last 3-4 months. He has been talking with Public Works about correcting that situation and
will proceed to do it in the near future. He strongly recommended the abandonment for
safety reasons if nothing else
Pat Mills, 4655 Bridge Blvd., advised that she was born on the property and was
opposed to abandonment of this section of Old Dixie Highway because traffic problems
would be exacerbated. She questioned Mr. Grave's concern for Wabasso because his
property and buildings are not properly maintained on this corridor road.
Sarah Fender, 8801 South Indian River Drive, Ft. Pierce, is the owner of the pie -
shaped piece of property. If the section of Old Dixie Highway is abandoned, the owner or
lessee of her property would be unable to compete with the gas station across the street. She
urged the Board to keep the roadway open.
Brian Heady asserted that the County should not enrich one taxpayer nor cause a loss
to another. He suggested that if the County is going to abandon the roadway, they should
divide the right-of-way between the two property owners and give half of it to each one.
Consider both property owners. But, if the Board does abandon it, then allow the taxpayers
to receive a benefit.
September 3, 2002
58
•
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams,
SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, to approve staffs
recommendation (deny request to abandon the County's rights
to the subject right-of-way).
Under discussion, Commissioner Macht spoke against the motion. He thought it was
important to look comprehensively at the whole piece of property and that it would benefit
the community by abandoning the right-of-way. He submitted that the Fender's pie -sliced
property would be very difficult to develop according to the Corridor Plan because of its
size. He thought it would be wrong to deny the request for abandonment based on historical
significance. If the road segment were to be abandoned there would still be access from the
main road to the Fender property.
Commissioner Adams submitted that this is a matter of more than just history. There
would be a lack of easy access to the Fender property. She would not support abandonment
since it would cause a detriment to the Fender's property.
Vice Chairman Tippin supported Commissioner Macht's statements. He saw minimal
potential for more packing houses and favored abandonment so the area can be developed
into an asset.
Commissioner Macht agreed the area facing US#1 needed to be improved.
Chairman Stanbridge indicated her support of staffs recommendation. That is a
public road which is vital to the property owners of the pie -shaped property. She felt there
is a possibility for value for that property but only if the rights-of-way are continued as they
are now.
September 3, 2002
59
•
e,
Commissioner Ginn added that she believed in strong private property rights and felt
the abandonment would damage the Fenders.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 3-2 (Vice Chairman Tippin and Commissioner Macht
opposed). (Request for abandonment of the subject right-of-
way denied.)
9.A.2. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED CONTRACT OFFER TO
LOST TREE VILLAGE CORPORATION AND DRAFT INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF VERO BEACH AND TOWN OF INDIAN
RIVER SHORES FOR PURCHASE OF THE LOST TREE ISLANDS
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, AICP
Community Development Director
'cCiLeNll
Roland M. DeBlgrs CCP
Chief, Environmental Planning
August 26, 2002
Board Consideration of Proposed Contract Offer to Lost Tree Village
Corporation and Draft Interlocal Agreement for Purchase of the Lost Tree
Islands
It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at
the Board's regular meeting of September 3, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
In March 2002, the County contracted with The Conservation Fund (TCF) to negotiate purchase of the
Lost Tree Islands (including McCuller's Point). As directed by TCF, county staff has now advertised a
public hearing for the September 3, 2002 Board meeting for the Board to consider the attached proposed
contract offer to Lost Tree Village Corporation (LTVC) for purchase of the Lost Tree Islands.
September 3, 2002
60
uli
•
Although TCF has had contact with LTVC over the past several months, the tetnis of the proposed
contract offer have not been accepted by LTVC. Rather, LTVC representative Charles Bayer has
indicated that LTVC will not consider terms for sale of the islands (and McCuller's Point) until LTVC
first receives a formal contract offer approved by the County, City of Vero Beach, and Town of Indian
River Shores. Recently, both the City and Town approved the proposed contract offer. The contract offer
is now being presented to the Board for consideration.
Contract Offer
Following is a summary of the main components of the proposed contract offer:
• $15 million purchase price for —505 acres (-235 acres of which are uplands), consisting of LTVC
ownership on the "Inner Islands", "Outer Islands", "McCuller's Point", and six small adjacent
islands.
• $10,000 earnest money deposit (non-refundable after an inspection period for due diligence).
• ' Bargain Sale" acknowledgment to allow LTVC to seek status of the sale as a charitable
contribution under applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code.
• "Involuntary Conversion" (threat of condemnation) provision to allow LTVC to seek tax relief.
• "Settlement of Claims" provision whereby LTVC must agree to dismiss all pending lawsuits and
agree not to initiate any future lawsuits regarding the subject property.
Funding Towards the Purchase
The County has reserved $8 million toward the purchase, and the City and Town have agreed to
contribute $1 million each toward the purchase. Last year, the County applied for a Florida Communities
Trust (FCT) grant to fund the remaining $5 million toward the $15 million purchase offer. The FCT
approved the grant, at 36.22% of "eligible project costs" or $5.5 million, whichever is less.
The Board recently approved an Addendum to the FCT Conceptual Approval Agreement that increased
the FCT match to 75% of eligible costs, provided the overall grant award does not exceed $5.5 million.
The Addendum ensures an FCT match of $4,875,000 (75% of $6.5 million, the current "as is" approved
appraised value) towards the Lost Tree Islands purchase price. The FCT will also pay 75% of acquisition
costs (i.e., appraisals, survey, environmental audit acquisition agent fees), provided the overall grant
award does not exceed $5.5 million.
The FCT match of $4,875,000 falls $125 000 short of the anticipated $5 million state match toward the
$15 million purchase offer. If an offer of $15 million is made and LTVC accepts, the $125,000 shortfall
will need to come from the local governments. Both the City and Town, when they recently considered
the proposed contract offer, agreed to evenly split the shortfall with the County ($41,667 each).
Interlocal Agreement
As the County, City and Town consider approval of the proposed contract offer, three issues warrant a
formal interlocal agreement. The issues are: who will be responsible for the state -funding shortfall toward
the proposed purchase offer; who will hold title interest if and when the project is purchased; and who
will be responsible for management funding. Attached is a draft interlocal agreement for the Board to
consider regarding these issues.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
Contract Offer
The $15 million purchase price is indicative of last year's proposed purchase offer that led the County,
City and Town to apply for an FCT grant. Since last year, the County has obtained two independent
appraisals of the islands, the results of which are public information. The appraisals, which have been
reviewed and approved by the FCT, provide values for three alternative scenarios (each with a
development density of one unit per five acres). The three alternatives are summarized as follows:
September 3, 2002
61
•
Alternative 1: "As is" recreational use (within Town limits) and development of the portion of the
property in Vero Beach where development without a bridge is permitted ($6.5 million FCT
approved value).
•
Alternative 2: Development of the Inner and Outer Islands without a bridge; assumes Indian
River Shores removes its requirement that island development requires road access by bridge ($9
million FCT approved value).
• Alternative 3: Development of the Inner and Outer Islands with a bridge to the Inner Islands from
Silver Sands Road; assumes the current State bndge access restriction is resolved either by
ownership of submerged land or by a submerged land lease with the State of Florida ($16.2
million FCT approved value).
Since the proposed offer of $15 million is more than the "as is" approved appraised value of$6.5 million,
a "super majority vote" (4 out of 5 in favor) is required for the Board to approve the contract offer.
FCT Funding Shortfall
As earlier explained in this memorandum, the FCT match of $4,875,000 falls $125,000 short of the
anticipated $5 million state match toward the $15 million purchase offer. Alternatives for the local
governments to make up this shortfall include:
1. Shortfall split evenly among the three local governments ($41,667 each).
2. Shortfall split based on the current local funding ratio of 80/10/10 ($100,000 County, $12,500
City, $12,500 Town).
3. Shortfall paid entirely by the County with environmental land bond funds.
The City and Town have agreed to evenly split the shortfall with the County ($41,667 each), which
county staff supports as the most appropriate alternative.
Fee -Simple Title Interest
The FCT Conceptual Approval Agreement provides that, if the project is acquired, the grant Recipient
will hold title interest. The FCT will have a "reversionary" interest, such that if the property is used for
anything other than conservation and passive recreation, the title will convey to the State Board of
Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund.
It is not specified in the grant agreement as to how the title interest will be held by the Recipient.
Alternatives include:
1. Title interest held entirely by Indian River County.
2. Title interest (undivided) split evenly among the three local governments.
3. Title interest (undivided) split based on current local funding ratio of 80/10/10 (County 80%
interest, City 10% interest, Town 10% interest).
The simplest approach is for the County to hold the title interest, similar to what has been done with the
County's other acquisitions of conservation land in municipal boundaries (e.g., Prange Islands, North
Sebastian Conservation Area). In those cases, the municipalities are consulted on and participate in
management issues, in that the municipalities review and approve project applications and conceptual
management plans. Moreover, restrictions associated with use of county environmental land bond funds
and FCT grant funds virtually guarantee that a property, if purchased, must be used only for conservation
and compatible passive recreation. Notwithstanding, if the City and Town insist on having title interest as
a condition of participating in management funding, the most appropriate approach is undivided title
interest based on the purchase -funding ratio of 80/10/10 (County 80%, City 10%, Town 10%).
September 3, 2002
Management Funding
The Lost Tree Islands property contains approxim:..cI235 acres of uplands impacted by nuisance exotic
vegetation (Brazilian pepper and Australian pine). In accordance with FCT grant award conditions, the
impacted uplands will need to be restored (albeit over an extended period of time) to native plant
community. The approved FCT grant project also calls for passive recreational improvements (docks,
boardwalks, fishing piers, picnic pavilions and trails) on portions of the property. Although grants,
volunteer work, and private development mitigation directed toward the project will be sought to defray
costs, restoration and management of the Lost Tree Islands could cost in excess of Si million, largely
attributed to habitat restoration. Prior to FCT funding reimbursement, it is required that a conceptual
management plan for the project be approved by the County, City and Town. That management plan will
be drafted (by the County's acquisition consultants, in coordination with county staff and with the City
and Town) once LTVC accepts an offer and the acquisition is imminent. In the meantime, there needs to
be a conceptual agreement between the County, City and Town concerning responsibility for restoration
and management costs. Alternatives include:
1. Restoration and management costs split evenly among the three local governments.
2. Restoration and management costs split based on the current local funding ratio of 80/10/10.
3. Restoration and management costs paid entirely by the County.
From an administrative standpoint, it is efficient for one entity (i.e., the County) to take the lead in
overseeing construction of initial capital improvements and ongoing maintenance. In that the project is
located in the City and Town and directly benefits residents in the municipalities, it is reasonable to
expect the City and Town to contribute toward improvements and management costs. Of the three
alternatives, staff thinks it is appropriate to request that the City and Town evenly split capital
improvement and management costs with the County.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approved the proposed purchase contract.
Staff also recommends that the Board approve the attached Interlocal Agreement, with the following three
conditions:
1. Shortfall split evenly among the three local governments ($41,667 each).
2. Title interest (undivided) split based on current local funding ratio of 80/10/10 (County 80%
interest, City 10% interest, Town 10% interest).
3. Restoration and management costs split evenly among the three local governments.
Moreover, staff recommends that the Board authorize county staff to coordinate with the City and Town
to obtain City and Town approval of the Interlocal Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Map of the Lost Tree Islands acquisition proposal
2. Proposed Contract Offer
3. Draft Interlocal Agreement
September 3, 2002
Chairman Stanbridge noted that Indian River Shores Mayor Thomas Cadden and
Vero Beach Vice Mayor Sandra Bowden were present.
Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief Roland DeBlois reviewed the memo using
a color graphic (page 305 of the backup). He advised that the City of Vero Beach and the
Town of Indian River Shores had agreed to split the Florida Communities Trust (FCT)
shortfall equally ($41,667 each) with the County. He pointed out that a decision in this
matter would require a super -majority vote. The local governments will have an 80-10-10
interest in the property and the State will have a reversionary interest. Lost Tree Village has
made it clear they will not discuss selling the property until they have received a written
offer. A management plan will be developed after the acceptance of the offer. Such a plan
would include plans for habitat restoration, recreation areas and public access. There are
235 acres now in mostly Brazilian pepper and Australian pine trees. There is potential for
restoration costs which could be funded through future grants and spread over time. He then
reviewed the recommendation andthree conditions (as above in the memorandum).
Commissioner Ginn understood the matter before them did not include management
plans, and Mr. DeBlois explained that their vote at this meeting would only cover the
purchase contract and interlocal agreements.
There was a brief discussion about the status of McCuller's Point.
Matt Sexton of the Conservation Fund pointed out the importance of the Indian
River Lagoon as the nation's most bio -diverse estuary and all its assets. He made the
following points: the Purchase Contract is $15,000,000 for approximately 505 acres. The
contract includes all the islands and McCuller's Point. It includes language concerning the
settlement of all pending lawsuits and provides for no future lawsuits. For the benefit of
Lost Tree, the contract will be structured as a "bargain sale" contract for Internal Revenue
September 3, 2002
Services purposes. That puts the burden of the Internal Revenue Service reporting on Lost
Tree Village. There is also included language addressing condemnation concerns.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Jens Tripson, 2525 14' Street, Vero Beach, president of the Pelican Island Audubon
Society, thanked everyone for their efforts in this matter. He encouraged the Board to make
the offer to purchase, enter into the interlocal agreements, and begin restoration.
Charles Lee, 1101 Audubon Way, Maitland, of the Audubon Society of Florida,
predicted that the decision today would define the life and the character of the Indian River
Lagoon. He thanked the Commissioners for their past support and hoped they would
approve staff's recommendation.
Jim Egan, Marine Resources Council, declared it appropriate to put these islands into
public ownership and urged approval even though the price exceeds the appraisals. He gave
assurance that management plan funding will be available to assist along with local dollars.
He believed the public would be very happy to participate also in this process.
B. J. McClure, 395 Nieuport Drive, Vero Beach, stressed that he had no interest in
this other than improvement of the environment of the Indian River Lagoon. He believed
this will be good for Indian River County and good for Lost Tree Islands He cautioned that
Lost Tree Village might make a counter-offer. He believed Commissioner Macht's advice
to wait until the lawsuits are settled is flawed and urged the Commission to vote
unanimously for approval.
Indian River Shores Mayor Thomas Cadden advised that on August 22, 2002, the
Town Council voted to support both issues. He felt predicting the outcome of lawsuits is
very dangerous.
September 3, 2002
Vero Beach Vice Mayor Sandra Bowden urged the Board to unanimously vote in
favor of purchasing the Islands.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Macht felt comments were in order. He recounted how in 1989 he (as
a City of Vero Beach Councilman) introduced the bridge ordinance and the R-1AAA to
restrict development on those islands for ecological reasons. When asked for their support,
at that time, the Marine Resources Council said it was a "local issue". He also had asked the
County Commission and got no help. The City's Planning & Zoning Board voted against
his proposals. All of them are now eloquent advocates of buying the islands He had won
three votes of the Council to press the R-1AAA zoning and the bridge ordinance. He
believed buying the islands at an elevated price does not make sense and suggested we may
be buying land Lost Tree does not even own. He thought the principal driving force is a
"not -in -my -backyard issue." The Board had authorized the Florida Communities Trust to
negotiate but where is the "negotiation"? In negotiation you do not offer everything you
have up front. The health of the Lagoon will be taken care of by R-1AAA. He believed
the County has no business spending excessive dollars above a reasonable appraisal price
to purchase these islands. He predicted that if the Board approves this now, it will destroy
the confidence of our citizens in passing another bond issue to buy environmentally sensitive
lands He hoped the Board would not approve this contract without some negotiation with
the other party.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Macht not to
approve staff's recommendation. There was no second.
September 3, 2002
Chairman Stanbridge ruled the motion had died for lack of a second.
Commissioner Ginn specified that the Board had voted to have Florida Communities
Trust negotiate with Lost Tree Village and this contract is the result. She urged the
Commissioners to put aside small, solvable problems and look at the main issue. She
asserted that the public has been waiting 13 years to buy these islands which were
recommended for purchase when the bond issue referendum was approved by the voters.
She feared more years of litigation if this contract is not approved. She urged the Board to
buy the islands for the future because the citizens demand it.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Tippin, to move ahead at full speed with
staff's recommendation.
Under discussion, Commissioner Adams commended the efforts of Commissioners
Macht, Ginn, and Stanbridge, as well as Mayor Cadden, and the City of Vero Beach. She
questioned the involuntary conversion language in the contract because the County is not
threatening condemnation. She needed a better comfort level and did not think it right,
particularly if this is the first offer She was concerned about where they would negotiate
from this point if the $15,000,000 offer is not accepted.
Commissioner Macht called the letter of donation a falsehood and felt we have no
business doing it.
Deputy County Attorney William Collins explained the document states a fact that
Indian River County has powers of eminent domain and may seek to acquire the property
through the exercise of those powers; it does not say we will. It is the policy of the land
acquisition program to look for a willing buyer/willing seller situation. As to negotiations,
September 3, 2002
the offer has been on the table for the last year; Mr. Bayer has made it clear there will be no
negotiations until he is brought an offer signed by each local government. This will let the
talking begin, but $15,000,000 is what has been on the table for the past year. Either he will
take it or not.
Mr. Sexton explained the benefits that will accrue to Lost Tree Village Corporation
resulting from the involuntary conversion.
There was discussion as to the veracity of the language.
Assistant Administrator Baird specified that the offer to purchase just says we have
the power; it does not say we will do it.
Mr. Sexton commented that the ultimate burden will be on Lost Tree Village
Corporation to prove any tax consequences to the IRS.
Mr. Lee advised that the language read by Deputy County Attorney Collins is
virtually ubiquitous and is used in every land acquisition contract from the State Department
of Environmental Protection and other agencies to buy land. The I.R.S. Code allows the
asset to be rolled over and the funds re -invested. It is used throughout the State in land
acquisition processes and is very close to "boiler plate." It has been used from Key West to
Pensacola in acquiring property since the early 1980's.
Discussion ensued on the issues and a language change suggested by County
Attorney Bangel which was not made.
Commissioner Macht called the question.
Vice Chairman Tippin commented they cannot predict what a future Board of County
Commissioners will do. The County does have the condemnation power and he thought the
Board should proceed.
September 3, 2002
Commissioner Adams indicated her support for the motion due to the work already
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
carried 4-1 (Commissioner Macht opposed).
CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE CALLED A 5 -MINUTE
RECESS AT 10:50 A.M. THE MEETING WAS
RECONVENED AT 10:58 A.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS
PRESENT.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WILL BE ON FILE WHEN RECEIVED
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PARTIALLY EXECUTED PURCHASE AGREEMENT
(SIGNED BY PURCHASER [THREE GOVERNMENT ENTITIES]) IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING - HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER,
INC.'S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL FOR
A GROUP HOME FACILITY - (SP-MA-02-09-52/CDPLUS #95100005-
31175) (Quasi -Judicial)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of August 22, 2002 using
a sketch of the proposed site plans and an aerial photograph of the location:
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
DE' • •'t MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
4 .f'. ,
Robert M. Keating, AICP3; Co unity evelopment Director
46
THROUGH• Stan Boling, AICP; Planning Director
FROM: Peter J. Radice; Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 22, 2002
September 3, 2002
SUBJECT: Hibiscus Children's Center, Inc.'s Request for Special Exception Use Approval
for a Group Home Facility
[SP-1114-02-09-52/CDPLUS 495100005-311757
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 3, 2002.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
WCG, Inc has submitted an application on behalf of Hibiscus Children's Center, Inc. to construct and
operate a group home facility (8 houses and a clubhouse) that will house up to 74 children on a
±4.13-acre subject site. Located on the south side of 12th Street, west of the 12th Street/Old Dixie
Highway intersection, the subject site is zoned RM-6, Residential Multi-Family (up to 6 units per acre),
and has an L-2, Low Density Residential-2 (up to 6 units per acre) land use designation Special
exception use approval is needed to operate a group home facility in the RM-6 zoning district.
A total of 8 "homes,' housing a total of up to 74 children, are proposed for the subject site. These units
will be in the form of single -family houses and set up to allow living space for abused and neglected
children under program care. Living space will include individual bedrooms and bathrooms, a
common living room and a common kitchen The clubhouse will contain administrative offices for
Hibiscus Children's Center, Inc as well as offices for counseling the children and a central meeting
room to conduct various activities with the children.
At its regular meeting of August 8, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-0 to
recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the special exception use request with
the conditions contained in the recommendation at the end of this report (please see attaclunent #5)
At this time, the Board of County Commissioners is to cons_
der approve with conditions, or deny the special exception use requestt for te he e proposed groupto up home
eoe
facility. Pursuant to section 971.05 of the land development regulations (LDRs), the Board is to
consider the appropriateness of the requested use for the subject site and surrounding area. The
Board may attach reasonable conditions and safeguards necessary to mitigate impacts and to ensure
compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS
Project Site Area: 4.13 acres
Note: Currently, the subject site consists of two separate parcels of record. Prior to site plan
release, the applicant will need to execute a unity of title for those parcels and submit a copy to
Planning Division staff.
Zoning Classification: RM -6, Residential Multi -Family (up to 6 units per acre)
Land Use Designation: L-2, Low Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units per acre)
Density: Permited: 6.0 units per acre
Proposed: 1.9 units per acre
Note: As described under item 15 of this report, the project proposes a maximum of 74
residents within the entire project at build out.
Building Area: Clubhouse*
8 group home units @sq. 2 677 4,572 sq. ft.
Total:
ft. per building 21,416 sg. ft
25,988 sq. ft.
September 3, 2002
Open Space: Require& 40.0%
Proposed: 71.0%
7. Impervious Surface Area: 53,059 sq. ft. or 1.22 acres
8. Stormwater Management: The preliminary stormwater management plan has been
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. One retention area is proposed and
is to be located in the central portion of the site. Via an existing drainage easement located
to the west of the subject site, treated stormwater from the site will outfall to an existing
Indian River Farms Water Control District ditch located along the south side of 12t Street.
Pursuant to Chapter 930 of the LDRs, a County Type 'A" Stormwater Permit will be
required prior to site plan release.
9. Off -Street Parking: Required: 37 spaces
Proposed: 37 spaces (35 standard, 2 handicap)
10. Traffic Circulation: Two one-way driveways will connect the site to 12th Street. The
western driveway will provide ingress to the site and the eastern driveway will provide
egress from the site. Since the facility will be for school age children, the applicant
anticipates frequent school bus traffic, and the two one-way driveways will allow for a safe
and efficient circulation of that bus traffic. Traffic Engineering Division staff has reviewed
and approved the project's driveway connections and internal circulation plan. No off-site
improvements are required for this development, and none are proposed.
11. Landscape Plan: The proposed landscape plan has been reviewed by planning staff and
meets the requirements of Chapter 926 of the LDRs for perimeter, interior, roadway and
non -vehicular open space landscaping areas No special landscape buffers are required for
group home facilities, and none are proposed by the applicant.
12. Utilities: The proposed development will be served by the County Utility Services
Department for potable water and sewer services. Connection to public water and sewer
services has been approved by the Utility Services Department and the Department of
Health.
13. Right -of -Way Acquisition: Outside of the development review process, the county will be
acquiring 11.5 feet from the subject site for 12th Street right-of-way to provide for the
ultimate width of 12th Street. The site plan does accommodate for the ultimate width of 12th
Street.
14. Required Improvements:
➢ 12' Street Sidewalk: The county's sidewalk and bikeway plan requires a 5 -foot wide
sidewalk along the project's 12th Street frontage. The applicant will be required to
construct or bond -out the sidewalk improvement prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the project.
15. Specific Land Use Criteria for a Group Home Facility [971.28(3)]:
The specific criteria for the proposed group home facility are addressed as follows:
1. The use shall satisfy all applicable regulations of the State of Florida and Indian River
County as currently exist;
Note: A signed affidavit has been submitted by the applicant stating that all applicable
regulations of the State of Florida and Indian River County as currently exist have been
satisfied.
September 3, 2002
2. The approving body shall determine that the proposed use is compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood in terms of land use intensity. The maximum allowable land
use intensity shall be computed as follows:
a. Regarding single-family zoningdistricts: (number of allowable dwelling units) x
(2.5 residents per dwelling unit) x 1.5 = maximum number of residents allowed.
b. Regarding multi family and commercial zoning districts: (number of allowable
dwelling units) x (2 residents per dwelling unit) x 1.5 = maximum number of
residents allowed.
In no case shall the maximum number of residents allowed on a project site exceed the
average maximum number of residents allowed (as calculated by the above formula) on
adjacent sites bordering the project site. Averaging for adjacent sites shall be based
upon length of the common border between the project site and the adjacent site.
Note: Since the subject property is zoned RM -6, the multi -family formula applies to this
project. The table below shows the calculations to determine the maximum number of
residents permitted for the subject site and the number of residents proposed for the
subject site.
Thus, the proposed group home intensity of 74 residents meets the maximum allowed on the
site.
3. To avoid unsafe or unhealthy conditions that may be produced by the overcrowding of
persons living in these facilities, a minimum floor area per person shall be required.
Floor area requirements shall be measured from interior walls of all rooms including
closet space.
a. Total interior living space. A minimum of two hundred (200) square feet of
interior living space shall be provided per facility resident. Interior living space
shall include sleeping space and all other interior space accessible on a regular
basis to all facility residents.
Note: The applicant proposes 289 sq. ft. per resident living space.
b. Minimum sleeping areas. A minimum of eighty (80) square feet shall be provided
in each sleeping space for single occupancy. A minimum of simy (60) square feet
of sleeping space shall be provided for each bed in a sleeping space for multiple
occupancy.
Note: Multiple occupancy is proposed for the sleeping quarters. The applicant
proposes 70.46 sq. ft per resident for sleeping space.
c. Bathroom facilities. A full bathroom with toilet, sink and tub or shower shall be
provided for each five (5) residents.
Note: The applicant proposes 1 full bathroom per 3.08 residents.
4. To avoid an undue concentration of group care facilities within residential
neighborhoods, all such facilities within residential zoning districts shall be located at
least one thousand two hundred (1,200) feet apart, measured from property line to
property line, unless exempted as follows. The separation distance requirement and
measurement shall not apply to group home or ACLF uses involving twenty-one (21) or
more residents, where such uses are located on major arterial roadways.
September 3, 2002
# of allowable dwelling
units
X
2 residents per dwelling
unit
X
1.5
Maximum # of residents
allowed
24.78
X
2
X
1.5
74.34
# of Proposed Residents
74
Thus, the proposed group home intensity of 74 residents meets the maximum allowed on the
site.
3. To avoid unsafe or unhealthy conditions that may be produced by the overcrowding of
persons living in these facilities, a minimum floor area per person shall be required.
Floor area requirements shall be measured from interior walls of all rooms including
closet space.
a. Total interior living space. A minimum of two hundred (200) square feet of
interior living space shall be provided per facility resident. Interior living space
shall include sleeping space and all other interior space accessible on a regular
basis to all facility residents.
Note: The applicant proposes 289 sq. ft. per resident living space.
b. Minimum sleeping areas. A minimum of eighty (80) square feet shall be provided
in each sleeping space for single occupancy. A minimum of simy (60) square feet
of sleeping space shall be provided for each bed in a sleeping space for multiple
occupancy.
Note: Multiple occupancy is proposed for the sleeping quarters. The applicant
proposes 70.46 sq. ft per resident for sleeping space.
c. Bathroom facilities. A full bathroom with toilet, sink and tub or shower shall be
provided for each five (5) residents.
Note: The applicant proposes 1 full bathroom per 3.08 residents.
4. To avoid an undue concentration of group care facilities within residential
neighborhoods, all such facilities within residential zoning districts shall be located at
least one thousand two hundred (1,200) feet apart, measured from property line to
property line, unless exempted as follows. The separation distance requirement and
measurement shall not apply to group home or ACLF uses involving twenty-one (21) or
more residents, where such uses are located on major arterial roadways.
September 3, 2002
Yn
Note: No other group home or ACLF facility exists within 1,200 feet of the subject site.
5. If located in a single-family area, the home shall have the appearance of a single-family
home. Structural alterations or designs shall be of such a nature as to preserve the
residential character of the building.
Note: While the subject site is zoned RM -6, which is a multi -family zoning district, all 8
group home units will be designed to resemble single-family homes.
6. If located in the AIR -1 zoning district, the site shall have an L-1 land use designation.
Note: The subject site is located in the RM -6 zoning district.
7. The facihty shall satisfy all applicable off- street parking requirements of Chapter 954.
The facility shall meet or exceed all open space requirements for the respective zoning
district.
Note: As discussed in sections 6 and 9 of this staff report, the project does satisfy the
off-street parking and open space requirements.
8. The maximum capacity of such facilities shall not exceed the applicable number
permitted by the department of health and rehabilitative services.
Note: Prior to site plan release, the applicant must provide a certification from the
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services stating the maximum capacity
permitted in the proposed facilities.
9. Group home permits are transferable. If the type of resident/client changes or the
resident capacity increases to such an extent that it would raise the facility to a higher
level group home as distinguished by the definition, the facility must be reevaluated for
an administrative permit or special exception approval.
Note: The applicant has been advised of this condition and will adhere to this condition.
Therefore, all applicable specific land use criteria for the group home facility are satisfied by
the proposed site plan.
16. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: 12th Street, Single -Family Residential/RM-6
South: Single -Family Residential/RM-6
East: Offices Mini-Storage/CL
West: Small Lot Single -Family Residential/RM-6
In summary, staff's analysis indicates that the application, with the conditions recommended below,
meets the general and specific criteria for special exception use approval for the proposed group
home facility.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners find that, in
conjunction with the recommended conditions:
September 3, 2002
?3s
73
nue
Lit
1. It is empowered under the provisions of Chapter 971 to review the special exception use applied
for;
2. The granting of the special exception use will not adversely affect the public interest;
3. The application satisfies the general and specific criteria required for special exception approval;
and
4. The conditions stated below are adequate to ensure compatibility between the special exception
use and surrounding land uses.
Staff further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use
approval for the proposed group home facility with the following conditions.
1. The maximum capacity of the facility shall be 74 residents.
2. Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall:
a. Provide a certification from the Department ofHealth and Rehabilitative Services stating
the maximum capacity permitted in the proposed facilities; and
b. Execute a unity of title for the subject site and submit a copy to Planning Division staff.
3. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the site, the applicant shall construct or bond -
out the required 12th Street sidewalk.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Application
2. Location Map
3. Site Plan
4. Approved Minutes from 08/08/02 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Pamela Waddell, 1200 10th Place, Vero Beach, advised that she and her neighbors
were concerned there would not be enough buffer and asked that a 6' privacy fence be
installed on the west side of the property, to the north and south, and on the south side of the
property, to the east and west. She presented a petition indicating that it was signed by the
neighbors. (PETITION IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD )
September 3, 2002
Norman Hensick, 425 32"d Avenue SW, advised he owns commercially -zoned
property to the east and indicated his support of the project. He declared that he and his wife
were some of the people in Vero Beach who are working to make the worthwhile project a
reality. He urged the Board to approve the request. He stated that a fence would be no
problem but pointed out there is already a good buffer in the existing native vegetation
which the Planning and Zoning Commission thought sufficient. He advised there were two
representatives from Hibiscus Children's Center present if the Commissioners had any
questions.
A blue folder of information about the organization and their proposed plan was
distributed to the Commissioners. (ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP IN THE OFFICE OF
THE CLERK TO THE BOARD)
(CLERK'S NOTE • MR AND MRS. HENSICK DONATED THE PROPERTY FOR
THE PROJECT.)
Commissioner Adams understood there would be no problem with installing a fence
as requested by the neighbors, and Mr Hensick responded that it would be an additional
expense, but they were willing to install a fence in order to let it move forward.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Macht pointed out that the Children's Advisory Committee gives
funding to Hibiscus.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously approved staff's
recommendation as fully set out in the memorandum above.
September 3, 2002
9.A.4. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2002-027 - ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT -16.85 ACRES FROM RS -6 AND RM -6 TO
RM -8 (EAST SIDE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD -
APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET NORTH OF 41ST STREET -
REQUESTED BY BOBO FAMILY
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THF OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed a Memorandum of
August 19, 2002 using a Power Point outline (ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD)•
TO: James E. Chandler; County Administrator
SPAR MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
"Robert M. Keating, MCP; Co munity Devel pment Director
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Randy Deshazo; Planner, Long -Range PlanningSD
DATE: August 19, 2002
The Bobo Family's request to rezone 16.85 acres from RS -6 and RM -6 to
RM -8 (RZON 2002-04-0105)
It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 3, 2002.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This request is to rezone 16.85 acres from RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6
units/acres), and RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre), to RM -8, Multiple -
Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre). The subject property is depicted in the figure
below, and is located on the east side of Indian River Boulevard, approximately 660 feet north of
415` Street. The purpose of this request is to secure the zoning necessary to develop the site at a
density consistent with the allowed density of its comprehensive plan land use designation
On July 25, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the request to rezone the subject property.
September 3, 2002
Existing Land Use Pattern
Generally, this area of the county contains a mix of residential uses, and abandoned and active
groves. The subject property is one of the abandoned groves. Overall, the property contains less
than an acre of land zoned RM -6, with the rest of the property having RS -6 zoning.
Land to the west of the subject property is zoned RM -8 and contains the Florida Club (Indian
River Courts) Planned Development. Land to the east is zoned RM -8 and contains a wooded lot.
Land to the northwest is zoned RM -6 and contains abandoned groves. Land to the north of the
subject property is zoned RS -6 and contains active groves, but is programmed for development
as a single-family subdivision. Land to the south is zoned RS -6, and contains groves.
MAN FIVER GERMS PD
?EL 11-N
PHASE 1
APARTMENTS
Indian River Blvd
Future Land Use Pattern
The subject property and all abutting properties are designated M-1, Medium -Density
Residential -1, on the county Future Land Use Map. The M-1 designation permits residential
uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. Land to the southwest south of 41St Street, is designated
C/I, Commercial/Industrial, on the county Future Land Use Map. The C/I designation permits
commercial and industrial development.
Environment
Being an abandoned citrus grove, the subject property is an altered site, and there are no
wetlands According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property lies within Flood
Zone AE
September 3, 2002
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county Wastewater service is available to the
site from the Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, while potable water service is
available to the site from the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant.
Transportation System
The property's west boundary abuts Indian River Boulevard. Classified as an Urban Principal
Arterial on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of Indian River Boulevard is
a 4 -lane paved road with approximately 200 feet of existing public road right-of-way. This
segment of Indian River Boulevard is programmed for expansion to six lanes by 2025.
ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented.
Specifically, this section will include:
an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities;
an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan;
an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and
an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality.
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is located within the county urban service area, an area deemed suited for urban scale
development. The Comprehensive Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation. The adequate provision of
these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community
The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also require that new
development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and
facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it
is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests; conditional concurrency review is required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a
proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the
requested zoning. For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the
County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of
the property and the maximum density under the proposed zoning. The site information used for
the concurrency analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Area to be Rezoned -
2. Existing Zoning Districts:
3. Proposed Zoning District:
16.85 acres
.07 acres of RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District
(up to 6 units/acre) and 16 78 acres of RS -6, Single -
Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre)
RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8
units/a cre)
September 3, 2002
4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Existing Zoning District.
5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property
Under Proposed Zoning District:
100 Single -Family Units
134 Multiple -Family Units
Transportation
As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study
(TIS). The county's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIS. A TIS
reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district and assigns those
trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's
LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty
(50) or more project trips, whichever is less.
According to the approved TIS, the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be
lowered by the traffic generated by development of 134 multiple -family units on the subject
property.
Water
With the proposed zoning, the subject property could accommodate 134 residential units,
resulting in water consumption at a rate of 134 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 33,500
gallons/day. This is based upon a level of service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. Development on the
subject property would be served by the South County Reverse Osmosis Plant, which currently
has sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed
rezoning.
Wastewater
Based upon the most intense use allowed under the proposed zoning, development of the
property will have a wastewater generation rate of approximately 134 Equivalent Residential
Units (ERU), or 33,500 gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of 250
gallons/ERU/day. County wastewater service is available to the site from the Central Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant, which currently has sufficient capacity to accommodate the
additional wastewater generated by the subject request.
Solid Waste
Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The
county's adopted level of service standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year.
With the county's average of approximately 2.3 persons/unit, a 134 unit residential development
would be anticipated to house approximately 308 people (2.3 X 134). For the subject request to
meet the county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill
must have enough capacity to accommodate approximately 607.15 (308 X 1.97) cubic
yards/year.
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates that
the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site under the
proposed zoning district.
September 3, 2002
Stormwater Manaczement
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require
on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations In
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stosmv, ater
Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian
River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited
from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the
approved IRFWCD discharge rate.
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do apply, since the property
lies within a floodplain. Also, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply Based
upon staff's analysis, the stormwater management level of service standard would be met by
limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-
four hours, and requiring retention of 394 459 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the
property.
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development
approval process.
Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the
most intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district
indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the
additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the
existing surplus acreage.
Park Information
LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population)
Project Demand (Acres)
Surplus Acreage
Concurrency Summary
Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities,
including stormwater management, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have
adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the
proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject
request.
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive
plan. Rezomngs must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on
the Future Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and
commercial and industrial land uses and their densities.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan.
Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to
September 3, 2002
direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies
provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan
policies are important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests.
Of particular applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies.
Future Land Use Element Objective 1
Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern
which reduces urban sprawl By allowing the site to be developed in a manner that is consistent
with the site's land use designation, the request allows a more compact land use pattern within
the urban service area and reduces the chances that urban sprawl will occur. For these reasons,
the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 states that the M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, land
use designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. In addition,
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 states that these residential uses must be located within the
urban service area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as M-1 on the county's Future
Land Use Map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning
districts would permit residential uses no greater than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M-1
designation, the proposed request is consistent with Policy 1.13.
Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2
Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2 states that the county shall encourage and direct growth into
the urban service area through zoning and LDRs. Since the proposed rezoning would allow and
encourage more development on the subject property, and the subject property is within the
urban service area the request implements Future Land Use Element Policy 2 2
Transportation Element Obi ective 11 and Policy 11.1
Transportation Element Objective 11 and Policy 11.1 state that the county will increase densities
in the urbanized area and along major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass
transit provision. Since the proposed rezoning will increase the allowed density along and near
several major transportation corridors, this request implements Transportation Element Objective
11 and Policy 11.1.
Consistency Summary
As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all applicable
objectives and policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, staffs position is that the
request is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
Staff's position is that the requested zoning district is appropriate for the site and that
development under this zoning. district would be compatible with surrounding land uses
Because land directly east and west of the subject property is zoned RM -8, the request is for a
continuation of an existing multiple -family residential zoning pattern. Also, the property is large
enough to provide buffering for future single-family development adjacent to the property.
September 3, 2002
etyt`a
Although the subject property and land to the north and south of the subject property are zoned
RS -6, that single-family zoning reflects pre -Indian River Boulevard conditions Before the
Boulevard was constructed in 1997 single-family would have been an appropriate use in this
area. At that time, the closest major roadway was U S 1, more than a mile to the west. With
construction of the Boulevard, however, multi -family became the most appropriate use for the
subject property.
As stated in the comprehensive plan, multi -family uses are appropriate along major roadways.
There are several reasons for that. Not only is multi -family less impacted by the noise and other
impacts from high speed, high volume, multi -lane roadways; but multi -family development
along major roadways puts more people in closer proximity to transit routes Also, multi -family
is a viable alternative to commercial uses along major roadways, while also providing customers
for commercial uses located in nodes along roadways.
For the reasons listed above, the proposed multi -family zoning for the subject property is more
appropriate than the existing single-family zoning for the subject property and the properties to
the north and south. Even so, single-family development on adjacent properties will not be
incompatible with multi -family development on the subject property.
Since multi -family and single family are both residential uses, they are generally compatible with
one another. In fact, single-family uses are allowed in multi -family districts. The Florida Club
project located across the Boulevard from the subject property is an example of this.
Any compatibility issues that do arise can be resolved through the site plan process. At the time
of project development, the site plan review process will require that buffers be established along
the subject property's perimeter to enhance compatibility between development on the property
and land to the north and south.
For these reasons, staff feels that the requested RM -8 zoning district would be compatible with
development in the surrounding area.
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
The environmental impacts of development on the subject property are not a major concern.
For that reason, no adverse environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated.
CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with
surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will
have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria
Most importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for medium -density
multiple -family uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis conducted, the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend
that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property
from RS -6 and RM -6 to RM -8 by adopting the attached ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Summary Page
2. Rezoning Application
3. Minutes of the July 25, 2002 Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
4. Ordinance
September 3, 2002
82
1
h�4
v.G
Commissioner Ginn stated she was not in favor of increasing the density. She was
willing to go to RM -6, but not to RM -8, and she was willing to change RS -6 to RM -6.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Michael O'Haire, attorney on Cardinal Drive, 575 A 1 A, advised he was representing
the Bobo Family who homesteaded the property at the turn of the last century. He specified
that there is already compatibility to the east of the property as it is already zoned RM -8.
The property was farmed land. This will be developed into senior citizens' living and will
be compatible with the surrounding area. He concluded the new zoning would not disrupt
anyone s life style.
Commissioner Adams asked if the project could be done with RM -6, and Mr.
O'Haire thought a project had been designed and approved with the 8 -unit per acre density,
but referred the question to Director Keating.
Director Keating advised this has been approved by the Technical Review Committee
and is predicated upon needing 8 units per acre.
Commissioner Ginn stressed it was a big leap from RM -6 to RM -8.
Director Keating explained that when the area was originally zoned, Indian River
Boulevard was not there. This now and is currently a 4 -lane divided road and will be 6 -
lanes in the future. State Road 60 and USW 1 are the appropriate areas where there would be
multi -family residential with increased densities.
Chairman Stanbridge recalled that Indian River Blvd. split the Bobo's property and
they had farmed their entire property.
Attorney Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Blvd., advised he represented the developer,
George Poydenis of Diamond Court Development. He referred to a letter from D. Victor
September 3, 2002
83
•
Knight, Jr., the property owner to the south, who recommends approval of the rezoning.
He pointed out that all the issues have been addressed and the request is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. The land will support the requested zoning and is compatible with the
surrounding properties.
George Poydenis, 115 Riverway Drive, Vero Beach, advised ifthey were to develop
the property with 6 units it would lessen the quality of the finished product. He explained
how amenities would be lost because of the cost differentials. He asked the Board to
consider that this will be aproject which will be a "cut above." The units will be an upscale
garden version with "heavy detail" which means that the units will have chair rails, sliding
windows, tile roofing, extra corridor widths, oak flooring, and will be a nice place to live.
These units will be rentals and sales. They have had a lot of success with this in New Jersey.
There will be a condominium association with tenants and owners on the board
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Tippin, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board adopted 4-1 (Commissioner
Ginn opposed) Ordinance No. 2002-027 amending the Zoning
Ordinance and the accompanying Zoning Map for 16.85 acres
located on the east side of Indian River Boulevard and
approximately 660 feet north of 41st Street from RM -6,
Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) and
RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), to
RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 units/acre);
and providing codification, severability, and effective date.
September 3, 2002
84
4
•
ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 027
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FOR 16 85 ACRES LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD AND APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET
NORTH OF 41ST STREET FROM RM -6 MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) AND RS -6, SNGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE), TO RM -8, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 8
UNITS/ACRE); AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency on
such matters, has held a public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this
rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did
publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that this rezoning is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public hearing pursuant to this
rezoning request, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the zoning of the following described properties situated in Indian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
THAT PART OF THE NORTH '/z OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EAST
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, ALL OF SAID LAND LYING AND
BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
is changed from RS -6, Single -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre) to RM -8, Multiple -Family
Residential (up to 8 units/acre)
AND
THAT PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH i/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, LYING
EASTERLY OF THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, ALL OF
SAID LAND LYING AND BEING I\ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
September 3, 2002
85
pv
«3l
'J a
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-027
is changed from to RM -6, i.vultipte-family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) to RM -8,
Multiple -Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre)
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Land Development
Regulations.
This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, on this 3rd day of September, 2002.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 21St day of August, 2002, for a
public hearing to be held on the 3rd day of September 2002, at which time it was moved for adoption
by Commissioner T1 ppi n , seconded by Commissioner Adams , and adopted
by the following vote:
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Vice -Chairman John W Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Nay
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: I..:7 -a /4)•
Ruth M. Stanbridge, C"�aiinian
ATTEST BY:
Jeffrey K. Barton, fille2-12ezi 1,/ $freer . e .
This ordinance was filed with the Department ofState on the following date: ,?`r'%'/,
/
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
APPRO
D AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
/ 7
`.
Ro.ert M. eating, AI P; Co ity Developiient Director
September 3, 2002
Indian River Co.
Admin.
Legal
Budget
Dept.
Risk Mgr.
Approved
9.A.5. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2002-062 - PAVING
& DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 34TH AVENUE SW, 35TH
AVENUE SW BETWEEN 13TH STREET SW AND 9TH STREET SW
(OSLO ROAD) IN GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION - INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. 9918
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
County Engineer Chris Kafer reviewed a Memorandum of August 20, 2002, and
gave a brief history of the project dating back to March 6, 2001:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Directo3r
AND
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine
FROM: Michael J. Mezzina, Civil Engineer
z
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage Improvements to 34th Avenue SW, 35th
Avenue SW between 13th Street SW and 9th Street SW (Oslo Road) in Grovenor
Estates Subdivision - IRC Project No. 9918
DATE: August 20, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On August 6, 2002 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 2002-056 providing
for certain paving and drainage improvements to 34th Avenue SW, 35th Avenue SW and Intersecting
Streets in Grovenor Estates Subdivision. A petition was received from the property owners on this
road. Sixty (60) property owners out of ninety (90) property owners signed the petition making it
67% in favor of having these roads paved.
On August 6, 2002 the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution 2002-057
setting the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the
assessment against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for September 3, 2002.
The property owners on 33rd Avenue SW between 9th Street SW & 13th Street SW in Grovenor
Estates Subdivision who have road frontage on the intersecting streets were assessed in 1987 (IRC
Project #8615) for the paving of 33`d Avenue SW These property owners were inadvertently placed
on the assessment roll for this project. Therefore it is recommended that these eight (8) property
owners be excluded from this assessment
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners move to approve the assessment roll
removing the eight (8) property owners fronting 33`d Avenue SW, and approve the confirming
September 3, 2002
87
'1
resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the September 3, 2002 Public Hearing. Revised
confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded to Chairman of the Board for signature
The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are available for viewing in the Board of County
Commissioner's office
ATTACHMENTS
1) Confirming Resolution
2) Assessment Roll and Cost Estimate
3) Assessment Map
4) Copy of typical letter sent to property owners
5) Copy of Publication
Mr Kafer commented that the project had been reduced in cost and advised that staff
had met with the homeowners the previous Thursday night. At that time, staff had received
a petition from some people who were in opposition. (COPY ON FILE WITH THE
BACKUP IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) Staff had tallied the
number of opposed and the number in favor and it was determined that 69% of the property
owners were in favor of the project. Staff's recommendation was to move forward with the
project.
In response to Commissioner Adams, Public Works Director James Davis advised
that this project will be paved with asphalt as opposed to the alternative paving method
because of the nature of the subdivision.
The Chairman opened the public hearing. and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter.
Jerry Saturday, 1206 36th Avenue SW, advised that she represented petitioners
opposed to this paving and drainage improvement. Those who petitioned originally for the
project were mistakenly told the County would pay for it and she, therefore, thought the
original petition was invalid. Many of the homeowners cannot afford an assessment which
September 3, 2002
88
r!!
•
fie
would place their only asset in danger. They were concerned that a future Board of County
Commissioners could decide to foreclose on their properties if a lien for the assessments
were placed on their property. Many people felt paved roads are less safe for their children.
She stated that the petition was turned in at Thursday night's meeting. She also indicated
that letters and faxes are still being sent by those who are in opposition to this project.
Susie Schuble, 1205 SW 33" Avenue, advised of a petition in favor of paving 33rd
Avenue SW. (Not included in this project.)
Commissioner Adams questioned, and Director Davis explained that the County had
petition -paved 33rd Avenue 10-12 years ago. At that time, everyone on 33rd Avenue was
assessed. This current assessment roll inadvertently includes those property owners, (pages
384-386) and they are being removed. At the last public hearing, there was an objection on
the un -platted property of Mr Lewis (west of 35th Avenue SW) but that has been platted and
is included in the assessment roll because it does have frontage. He believed that Mr. Lewis
was planning to speak on it.
Ms. Schuble asked to read the petition into the record in favor of paving and
drainage which had been signed by residents of 33' Avenue SW. The petition asked for 34th
and 35th Avenues SW to be paved because of the extra traffic experienced on 33' Avenue
SW for access to Oslo Road. The residents on 33" had also done a traffic count on August
28, 2002, which does not include buses, FedEx, UPS, County, or utilities trucks. (CLERK'S
NOTE• THE PETITION AND TRAFFIC COUNT ARE ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD) She stated that 34th Avenue SW
should be paved and the drainage improved because now 33rd is the only paved road and the
residents on 33rd need relief from the additional traffic. She also spoke of concerns about
September 3, 2002
89
;v
J4.)
•
added traffic on 33`d with the development of Ansley Park.
Charles A. Weber, Jr., 1146 35th Avenue SW, wanted paving for health reasons
(dust) and safer driving. He suggested that paving would increase property values and three
of his neighbors were in favor of the paving.
Alison Votzi, 3300 12th Street SW, wanted the road paved.
John Quigley, 3428 SW 11th St, asked that the road be paved and commented on dust
and drainage.
Earl Beinhower, 1046 35th Avenue SW, stressed the need for drainage.
Junior Beinhower, 1025 34th Avenue SW, spoke in favor of the paving and
drainage.
Attorney Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Blvd., advised he was representing Dennis
Lewis, who is not opposed to the paving project. Mr Lewis owns commercially -zoned
property at Oslo Road and 35th Avenue SW and he will not benefit from the paving when
the property is developed according to Community Development Director Robert Keating.
Under the proposed assessment list in the backup, his client would be assessed $22,000 and
derive no benefit from the project. He asked the Board to eliminate Mr. Lewis' name from
the assessment roll. (LETTER OF AUGUST 22, 2002 FROM COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBERT KEATING TO MR BARKETT CONCERNING
ACCESS TO THE LEWIS PROPERTY IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD )
Chairman Stanbridge and Commissioner Adams agreed with Mr. Barkett's reasoning
on behalf of his client.
September 3, 2002
90
•
11(
Jt
•
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Macht's inquiry concerning Mr Lewis' property,
Director Davis stated that Mr. Lewis' property does have frontage on 35`" Avenue SW, but
staff cannot speculate on when or how it will be developed. It if it is developed
commercially, it cannot have a connection to 35' Avenue SW.
Chairman Stanbridge was concerned about the discrepancy on the number of
petitioners.
Commissioner Adams commented that folks in this area have been before the
Commission twice and the Commissioners have people who are for and against. She stated
that the number of people in favor far outnumbered those opposed and those folks need
some relief.
Mr. Cafer commented that there seemed to be an equal representation of pros and
cons at the Thursday night meeting. The original petition had 67% in favor.
(CLERK'S NOTE* SEVERAL LETTERS AND/OR NOTES WERE SUBMITTED TO
THE DEPUTY CLERK AND HAVE BEEN PLACED ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD )
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
assessment roll with the removal of the property owners on 33`d
Avenue SW and the commercially -zoned property (of Mr.
Lewis) and adopted Resolution No. 2002-062 confirming the
September 3, 2002
91
•
R.
assessment roll (as amended) for certain paving and drainage
improvements to 34th Avenue SW 35th Avenue SW from 13tH
Street SW to 9th Street SW (Oslo Road) and certain intersecting
streets in Grovenor Estates Subdivision. (Project No. 9918)
Confirming (Third Reso.) 10/30/97(ENG)RES3 MAG\ktp
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 062
A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TO 34TH AVENUE SW, 35TH AVENUE SW FROM 13TH
STREET SW TO 9TH STREET SW (OSLO ROAD) AND
CERTAIN INTERSECTING STREETS IN GROVENOR
ESTATES SUBDIVISION - IRC PROJECT NO. 9918
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County adopted
Resolution No. 2002-056 providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to 34TH AVENUE
SW, 35TH AVENUE SW FROM 13TH STREET SW TO 9TH STREET SW (OSLO ROAD) IN
GROVENOR ESTATES SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which the special assessments are
to be made and how the special assessments are to be paid; and
WHEREAS, the resolution was published as required by Section 206.06, Indian River
County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County passed
Resolution No. 2002-057, on August 6, 2002, which set a time and place for a public hearing at
which the owners of the properties to be assessed and other interested persons would have the chance
to be heard as to any and all complaints as to said project and said special assessments, and for the
Board to act as required by Section 206.07, Indian River County Code; and
September 3, 2002
•
Ii
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public hearing was published in the
Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper on August 13, 2002 and August 20, 2002, (twice, one week
apart, and the last being at least one week prior to the hearing), as required by Section 206.06, Indian
River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at least ten days prior to the
hearing, as required by Section 206.06, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County on Tuesday,
September 3, 2002, 9:05 A.M. conducted the public hearing with regard to the special assessments,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety.
2. The Board finds that the properties assessed by this resolution will receive special
benefits equal to or greater than the cost of the assessment.
3. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are hereby confirmed
and approved, and shall remain legal, valid, and binding first liens against the properties
assessed until paid in full.
4. The County will record the special assessments and this resolution, which describes the
properties assessed and the amounts of the special assessments, on the public records,
which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the special assessments.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner G1 nn , and, upon being put to
a vote, the vote was as follows:
September 3, 2002
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
93
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
2,
rp na'+s n w 't
1'
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day
of September
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attestc-1
Attachment ASSESSMENT ROLL
FULL ASSESSMENT LIST WILL BE ON FILE WITH THE ORIGINAL
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
AND WILL BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS
9.A.6. PUBLIC HEARING - CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR A CLASS El CERTIFICATE
FOR THE PLACE AT VERO BEACH
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Emergency Services Director John King reviewed a Memorandum ofAugust 9, 2002:
September 3, 2002
Indian River County
Approved
Date
Administration
Budget
g'21j —Legal
4 trOtr
1
1.
1 0
Risk Management
I
,
py'iii- cy
/ C
g ZZ
Public Works
Ov
Engineering
�/�
CW {/��
¶-20-a Z
FULL ASSESSMENT LIST WILL BE ON FILE WITH THE ORIGINAL
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
AND WILL BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS
9.A.6. PUBLIC HEARING - CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR A CLASS El CERTIFICATE
FOR THE PLACE AT VERO BEACH
PROOF OF PUBLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Emergency Services Director John King reviewed a Memorandum ofAugust 9, 2002:
September 3, 2002
•
TO:
THROUGH:
THROUGH
FROM:
Honorable Board of County Commissioners
James E Chandler, County Administrator
John King, Director
Department ofEme ncy ervices
Brian Burkeen, EMS Chief �� V
Department of Emergency Services
DATE• August 9, 2002
SUBJECT: Consideration of an Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity for a Class El Certificate for The Place at Vero Beach.
It is respectfully requested that the item herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners during the public hearing scheduled for September 3, 2002.
On August 31, 1995, the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board recommended to the
County Commission that an ordinance be adopted to require a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity (COPCN) for the regulation of wheelchair services.
On September 19, 1996, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved regulations
governing wheelchair services as outlined in County Ordinance, Chapter 304, Life Support and
Wheelchair services.
Indian River County allows different types of medical transport, which have been categorized into six (6)
classifications Pursuant to Chapter 304 of the Indian River County Code, the following Certificates of
Public Convenience and Necessity (COPCN) may be issued:
Class A:
Class B:
Class C:
Class D:
Class E:
Class El:
Governmental entities that use advanced life support vehicles to conduct a pre-
hospital EMS ALS/BLS service. Current number of certificates -2
Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance inter -facility medical transport at
the ALS/BLS level. Current number of certificates -2
Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance inter -facility medical transports
which require special clinical capabilities and require a physician's order. Current
number of certificates -1
Agencies that provide non -emergency ambulance medical transports limited to out
of county transfers. Current number of certificates -0
Agencies that provide wheelchair vehicle service where said services are paid for in
part or in whole either directly or indirectly with government funds. Current
number of certificates -6
Agencies that provide wheelchair vehicle service where said services are not paid
for in part or in whole either directly or indirectly with government funds. Current
number of certificates -2
September 3, 2002
95
•
On July 18, 2002, an application for a Class El Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity was
received from The Place at Vero Beach. The facility currently owns a wheelchair van to provide
transportation to their in-house residents. The facility imposes no transportation costs for those residents
that are wheelchair dependant or ambulatory.
A public meeting with The Place at Vero Beach occurred on August 26, 2002. Staff invited
representatives from all municipalities, other county transport services, and the applicants to attend the
meeting. No objections were received in the meeting or by telephone contact from interested parties. The
applicant provided information that the vehicle provides accommodations for only one wheelchair per
trip The Applicant also states that nearly all of the trips are for ambulatory residents Wheelchair
dependant residents are only transported for the purpose of physician appointments.
Staff presents that there are no known reasons to deny this application.
Indian River County Code of Ordinance Chapter 304.14 (4), To obtain an "E" certificate a showing of
need for the service shall accompany the application. There shall be no showing of need required for an
"El" certificate.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that a class "El" certificate be issued to The Place at Vero Beach to be effective from
September 3, 2002, and expiring September 3, 2004.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Application from The Place at Vero Beach
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously approved issuance of
a Class "E1" Certificate to The Place at Vero Beach to be
effective from September 3, 2002, and expiring September 3,
2004.
COPY OF El CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
September 3, 2002
96
x,
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM BRIAN T.
HEADY TO SPEAK
The Board reviewed a letter of August 2002:
August, 2002
Chairman, County Commission
Margaret Gunter
Indian River County Commission Members
Vero Beach Florida 32960
Dear County Commission Commissioners:
Please place me on the citizen input public discussion portion of your agenda for
the next meeting. This is my SENS request to speak at this meeting. I request to speak
to the Indian River County Commission about saving tax dollars,
If you have any questions I can be reached by telephone at 7784028.
Sincerely,
Brian Heady suggested the County could save the taxpayers from paying for a new
County Administration Building. He reasoned that the County could terminate the lease of
the School Board on the 20,000 square foot building they lease from the County so some
ofthe County offices could move it. The School Board could move into some ofthe vacated
space they own.
Commissioner Ginn advised Mr Heady that the Space Needs Committee had
addressed that scenario during their deliberations and had determined that, when projected
September 3, 2002
out to 2020, the County will need 170,000 square feet and the addition of the School Board
building's 20,000 to the 82,000 square feet we now occupy would not give the County
sufficient space for County administrative needs She stated she has all the information and
would be pleased to allow Mr Heady to look at it and added that Mr Frank Coffey was the
space needs engineer on the SNC.
Mr Heady indicated his intention to accept Commissioner Ginn's offer.
Commissioner Macht pointed out that it is not Just space that is needed but the type
of space is important. He also pointed out that the current Administration Building is a "sick
building" and renovating it would cost far more. In addition, he stated that the County
cannot evict the School Board without notice.
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REPORT OF JIM EGAN -
MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL (moved from 8.B.)
The Board reviewed an e-mail and its attachment of August 19, 2002:
Margaret Gunter
From: Marine Resources Council [council@mrcirl.org]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:30 PM
To: Margaret Gunter
Subject: Jim Egan on Sept. 3 Agenda
Here is a summary of the issues he will discuss. What time does the meeting start and roughly when do you think
he will be on. Thank you.
Beth McMillen
Marine Resources Council
270 Paint Street
Rockledge, FL 32955
phone: (321) 504-4500
fax: (321) 504-4488
September 3, 2002
Y[,
ea -
•
Indian River Lagoon North Restudy - Erwin Wunderlich with the Army Corps of Engineers gave a presentation on
the Corps plan to do a restoration feasibility study of the Indian River Lagoon in Volusia, Brevard and Indian River
Counties in conjunction with the St. Johns Water Management District and the Indian River Lagoon Program. A
similar study has just been completed for the southern lagoon in Martin and St. Lucie Counties. The restudy will
build upon efforts that are ongoing. Some possible projects may include muck removal, restoration of wetlands,
improved sediment retention, control of runoff, removal of exotic vegetation, improvement of flow past causeways
and flood protection. The goal is to improve water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and help maintain and improve
flood protection and water supply.
Lost Tree Island - Roland DuBlois of the Indian River County Planning Dept. gave an update on the efforts to
purchase Lost Tree Island. The County has set aside $8 million in its environmentally endangered land funds and
has been awarded a $ 5.5 million grant from the Florida Communities Trust to help purchase the islands. Lost Tree
Island Corporation has not yet agreed to sell.
A recent court ruling that the property owned by Lost Tree Village Corp. does not extend to the barrier island
would prohibit building a bridge to the island.
County Utility Plan for Reverse Osmosis - Gene Rauth from Indian River County Utilities gave a presentation on
how the Utility is looking to dispose of its Reverse Osmosis waste water in the most environmentally friendly way.
Currently the South County Facility is discharging into the South relief canal and the North County Facility
discharges directly into the Indian River Lagoon. As a short term solution they want to move the discharge from the
north facility into the North Relief Canal so there would be some mixing. The plan is to have an upper pool and a
lower pool for mixing the stormwater with the Reverse Osmosis discharge to lower the salinity to where it could be
used to irrigate golfcourses. One community suffering from salt water intrusion is looking to use the stormwater-
R.O. mix for irrigation. The Calpine power plant also needs water for its cooling process which evaporates all the
fluids leaving an ash byproduct which would be deposited in a landfill. The County has a $4.33 million dollar grant
and is moving forward with construction.
Indian River County's Stormwater Plan - Indian River County Commissioner Ruth Stanbridge gave a presentation
on the County's Plan to reduce the County's stormwater discharges into the Indian River Lagoon. The plan would
divert the water west to large retention areas surrounded by parks. Retention would help recharge groundwater
while removing harmful nutrients currently being flushed into the lagoon. The conceptual plan was done December
2001. In June 2002, analysis will be completed for projects to reduce stormwater in the North & South relief canals.
In July, an evaluation report will be completed and workshops held for public input. The final master plan should be
submitted to the County in August.
St. Sebastian River Muck Dredging and Inlet Realignment - Ralph Brown from the St. Johns River Water
Management District gave a presentation on the proposed muck dredging in the St. Sebastian River and of a shoal
behind the inlet. The dredging is required because the natural sump areas in the river which capture the muck
before it reaches the lagoon are full. By removing the build-up, these areas will once again capture muck. Other
options are also being examined to help control the amount of muck entering the river. The shoal behind the Inlet is
being dredged to allow direct access to the Intracoastal waterway channel and avoid boats taking several routes
causing widespread seagrass damage.
Dr. Grant Gilmore of Dynamac gave a presentation on his concerns about several rare species of fish in the St.
Sebastian River which rely on fine sediments for their survival. The concern is that these sediments may be
removed along with the muck during the dredging process. He would like for this issue to be investigated as part of
the impact assessment of the project. Bob Day from the Indian River Lagoon Program explained that the intent is
to remove only the concentrated muck and that large quantities of fine material will remain.
Annexation of Parcels on the St. Sebastian River
Two Parcels located between State Roads 512 and 510, along the South Prong of the St. Sebastian River are
seeking to be annexed to the City of Sebastian. Currently they are outside of the Urban Service Boundary. There is
concern that future annexing of parcels by the City will increase development impacts on the Sebastian River and
increase water and sewage costs to Indian River County which would likely have to supply these utilities to this area.
September 3, 2002
99
r;
3+
Jim Egan, director of the Marine Resources Council, advised that the Marine
Resources Council along with the Indian River Lagoon Program take care of the National
Estuary Program for this area. They hold a series of public workshops four times a year
when the public can raise issues of concern in the area. He stressed the MRC is looking for
feedback from the County and reported that the Indian River Lagoon North Restudy is a new
opportunity to look at some long-term large-scale fixes that could possibly be funded. If the
funding does not happen in Indian River County, some other area will avail themselves of
it. He suggested thinking be given to stonaiwater problems in Indian River County, as well
as the Stormwater Master Plan and some other situations that may exist and be ideal
candidates for long-term funding. He believed there is some concern about County parcels
in the vicinity of Sebastian. These old groves are often being annexed and are turning into
urban lands. The south prong of the St. Sebastian River is a very, very fragile water body
and it is now known there are some 6 or 7 species unique to that river. These species were
formerly found in the St Lucie River and Taylor Creek but have been nearly eliminated
from those waters as a result of stormwater runoff The MRC has been looking to help
complement activities the County is already undertaking such as purchases by the County
south of the Sebastian Buffer Preserve in the vicinity of CR5 l2 and CR510 and to facilitate
public recreation as well as buffering. He agreed with an earlier comment that the MRC was
very lax in the past about local issues. As a result of the public workshops the MRC is
looking to give support in every county where the Indian River Lagoon flows. He
anticipated the MRC could help the County with Lagoon issues in any way possible.
September 3, 2002
100
alto
4Y_
•
10.A. UPDATE ON DELAYING TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
PAYMENTS UNTIL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) FOR
NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
Assistant Administrator Baird reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
Assistant County Administrator '.\-47,
DATE: August 27, 2002
SUBJECT: Update on Delaying Traffic Impact Fee Payments Until Certificate of
Occupancy (C.O.) for Non -Residential Projects
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board
of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 3, 2002.
BACKGROUND:
At its August 13, 2002 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to
devise a system whereby developers of "smaller" non-residential development projects
could delay payment of traffic impact fees (TIFs) until the time a Certificate of
Occupancy (C.O.) is issued. Currently, in Indian River County s unincorporated area and
in the municipalities, TIFs are collected prior to issuance of a building permit. As
discussed at the August 13th meeting, staff was instructed to explore changing the timing
of TIF payments without going through the land development regulations (LDR)
amendment process.
Staff has researched potential TIF payment timing changes and began coordinating with
the municipalities. The following is provided to the Board as an update on those efforts.
ANALYSIS:
Traffic impacts are one of several types of impacts that are assessed prior to issuance of
building permits. That assessment is conducted through review and issuance of a
concurrency certificate, as required under state law. A concurrency certificate is issued
for a given project upon a determination that sufficient capacity (e.g. roadway capacity)
exists to serve the project and that such capacity is reserved for that project.
Under county -wide policies and regulations, roadway traffic capacity is reserved upon
payment of TIFs. Thus under current procedures for projects in the unincorporated area
and within the municipalities, TIFs are collected at the time of building permit issuance
to reserve the roadway capacity for a particular project on a particular site. Such a
reservation is a guarantee for the property owner/builder, and any financial entities
associated with the project, that adequate services will be in place to serve the project.
The reservation of capacity excludes other owners/developers from using that same
capacity and guarantees that a C.O. will be issued when the project is constructed in
conformance with the approved building permit and site plan.
September 3, 2002
101
�y
7
•
M1
The principal issues in changing TIF payment timing involve determining which projects
qualify, guaranteeing capacity without fee payment, and coordinating with the
municipalities. The following summarizes staff's work to date on these issues.
• Determining Which Projects Should Qualify
Based on discussion at the August 13th Board meeting, staff determined that "smaller"
non-residential projects (all commercial, industrial, office and institutional uses) would
qualify. To determine a threshold, for "smaller' projects, staff reviewed recent TIF
payment history for non-residential projects in the unincorporated area and the City of
Vero Beach. That data is as follows:
Period of August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2002
incor orated Area and City of Vero Beach
an p
TIF Dollar Amount
Number of Non Residential
Projects
Percent of Total
Under $10,000.00
43
54%
$10,000.00 - 19,999.99
15
19%
$20,000.00 — 29,999.99
6
7%
$30,000.00 — 39,999.99
1
1%
$40,000.00 — 49,999.99
5
6%
$50,000.00 and more
10
13%
TOTALS
80
100%
Just over half of the total projects had TIFs under $10,000.00 and the significant majority
(87%) had TIFs under $50,000.00 Thus, a dollar amount threshold between $10,000.00
and $50,000.00 could be used to determine what constitutes a ' smaller" qualifying
project. Such a threshold would directly correspond to project traffic impacts and could
be precisely calculated for all types of projects. If a dollar threshold is selected a policy
determination would also need to be made as to whether or not a partial TIF could be
paid for a large project, whereby payment of the threshold dollar amount portion of the
total project TIF could be delayed to the time of C.O. Such an approach would be
similar to breaking -down a larger project into "smaller" projects for TIF payment
purposes.
• Guaranteeing Capacity Without Fee Payments
As explained earlier, capacity must be reserved at the time of building permit issuance.
Without fee payments, the payment for such capacity must be guaranteed. Such a
guarantee could take the form of an unsecured "loan" from the county or the city that
issues the building permit to the owner/developer. The county or city could withhold
issuance of a C.O. to induce an owner/developer to pay the TIF in order to ' pay-off the
loan" The county or city and the owner/developer could enter into such a "loan"
arrangement prior to issuance of a building permit Such a loan would need to be limited
September 3, 2002
102
41,
3)
•
• •
in time, such as for a period of 12 months, so that the TIF payment would be due at the
time of C.O. or at 12 months after building permit issuance, whichever occurs first. For
TIF accounting purposes, such loan arrangements would be treated as financial
obligations with a specific date due.
• Coordinating With the Municipalities
The County and City of Vero Beach share the same building department and the same
TIF payment and concurrency and certificate system. County staff administrates that
system. Currently, the other municipalities collect TIF payments at the time they issue
building permits and the County collects TIFs from them once a week. These
municipalities issue their own C.O.s . Because each jurisdiction collects TIFs and issues
C.O.s, and because each jurisdiction would be responsible for guaranteeing TIF payments
to reserve capacity, each municipality will need to consider any proposed changes to the
timing and procedures for TIF payments. In order for the process to remain uniform
county -wide all of the municipalities would need to agree to the same set of changes.
Staff has contacted Fellsmere and Sebastian staff regarding potential changes. Fellsmere
staff indicated no interest in changing current procedures Sebastian staff indicated that
its City Council would need to consider in detail any such changes and would like to have
the criteria for who would quality, as well as the process we plan to use. Thus, at this
time it appears that it may not be possible to obtain concurrence of all the municipalities
for a uniform county -wide change to delay TIF payments.
Based upon the direction given at the August 13`h Board meeting, staff is continuing to
devise a system for a TIF payment delay and coordinate with the municipalities. We
need further guidance from the Board of County Commissioners in order to proceed.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Assistant Administrator Baird asked for additional guidance from the Commissioners
in this matter. He explained how the Board's request for a quick way to proceed was
delayed. City Manager Terrence Moore of Sebastian had some very good questions and
wanted the complete criteria so he could take it to his City Council. John Little in Fellsmere
was not receptive to the change because he thought it should be an LDR amendment and
was also concerned about thinly -capitalized businesses.
Assistant Administrator Baird suggested the loans be available for non-residential
projects under $50,000 for a 12 -month maximum with the applicant's signature on a bridge -
type loan agreement which would probably be unsecured. There could be language that the
County could lien the property if not paid within the 12 -month period. If Fellsmere is
September 3, 2002
sG
103
r1!!
L1 ti
r ., •
1
i J 3 ,
opposed, he did not know what our status would be. Procedurally, he thought the applicant
should come to the County first where we would do the agreement and then a copy of the
agreement could be taken to the municipality.
Commissioner Macht raised the issue ofwhat would happen ifthe person who applies
for such a loan makes progress payments to his contractor and then never opens the business
for whatever reason the business does not get their Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.).
Commissioner Adams responded that there would be no traffic impact if a business
does not open.
Commissioner Ginn commented we might be left with an unfinished building.
More discussion ensued and Assistant Administrator Baird mentioned the County
would not issue a C.O. until the loan is paid off; failing that we could lien the property.
Commissioner Adams suggested we could require payment by certified check or wait
until their check clears the bank. She stressed the need to help the little guys and bring
those kinds of business back to the county. She wanted to see this issue brought to the
elected officials of both Sebastian and Fellsinere for their comments and decisions.
Assistant Administrator Baird asked the Board for the criteria so staff can finalize the
procedures for sending to the municipalities. He recommended this be done for projects
under $50,000 for a maximum of 12 months for a loan. The procedure would be that they
would make application to the County, copy to municipalities, and pay with a certified check
or, if paid by personal or company check, the CO would be issued when the check had
cleared the bank.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Chairman Stanbridge, the Board unanimously approved the
concept of financing non-residential traffic impact fees under
$50,000 for up to 12 months. Certificate of Occupancy be
issued after the applicant's check clears the bank.
September 3, 2002
104
n
11.B.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-063 - RE -AUTHORIZATION OF
IMPOSITION OF E911 FEE
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 16, 2002:
TO. Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: John King, Director
Department of Emerg. Se ices
DATE: August 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Re -authorizing Imposition of E911 Fee
The Florida Legislature in 1991 passed legislation amending Chapter 365.171, revising
provisions relating to the "911" fee which permits county governments to impose a fee on all
residential and business telephone lines to pay for expenses associated with the operation of the
E911 system with a cap of $.50.
The revisions approved by the legislature provide for the following actions:
1. Deleted the requirement for annual approval of a county's recurring fee by the
Division of Communications;
Specified that a fund be established exclusively for 911 fee revenues and
expenditures;
3. Established that 911 funds be used only for specified purposes;
4. Requires an annual audit of the fund;
5. Provides for carry over of funds; and
6. Provides for expenditure of fees for certain employee positions.
In FY 2001/2002, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved
imposition of a $.50 fee per line (up to a maximum of 25 access lines per account bill
rendered) per month to fund the permitted charges and expenses of the two (2) Public Safety
Answering Points (PSAP) in the County.
Information from BellSouth indicates that Indian River County has a total of 81,267 lines,
which would be subject to the 911 fee with some exclusions. If the Board approves the
recommended charge of $.50, staff estimates it would generate approximately $487,602 in
revenue, less the 1% BellSouth collection fee. The matter is now before the Board of County
Commissioners for approval of the Resolution to re -authorize the E911 fee for FY 2002/2003
at $.50 per line (up to a maximum of 25 access lines per account bill rendered) per month.
September 3, 2002
l.?
•
105
nt,
ill
L.
-„
•
The funds from the 911 fee will be utilized for staff maintenance of the data base, three (3) call
taker positions, operating expenditures, CAD system, capital outlay, and a contingency fund to
ensure the integrity of the system of timely direct emergency personnel so that the protection of
lives and property can be assured.
If approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the Resolution will be forwarded to
BellSouth so that the fee will remain at the same rate as the past year with an effective date of
October 1, 2002.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the resolution re -authorizing and imposing the E911 surcharge
with a $.50 fee for FY 2002/2003.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed resolution imposing E911 fee
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2002-063 providing for the establishment of a
countywide "E911" telephone fee to pay for system charges,
providing for severability, providing for inclusion in the Indian
River County Administrative Code, and providing for an
effective date.
RESOLUTION - 2002-063
RESOLUTION OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
COUNTYWIDE "E911" TELEPHONE FEE TO PAY FOR SYSTEM CHARGES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINIS IRATIVE CODE AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature enacted Section 365.171, Florida Statutes, entitled
"The Florida Emergency Telephone Act," to permit the imposition of a "911" fee on all residential
and business telephone lines; and
WHEREAS, this fee may be used to pay for all charges assessed to the Countywide "911"
emergency telephone system; and
September 3, 2002
106
•
•
WHEREAS, this fee may not exceed $.50 per line, per month; and
WHEREAS, the "911" fee will generate revenue which will pay the cost of providing such
service throughout the County including the various municipalities; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Section 1. That the Board of County Commissioners hereby establishes a fee of $.50 per
month per access line up to a maximum of 25 access lines per account bill rendered. This fee shall
be in effect for 12 months from the effective date of this Resolution at which time it shall be
reviewed by the Board pnor to the beginning of fiscal year 2003-04.
Section 2. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 365.171, Florida Statutes,
BellSouth Business Systems, Inc. shall collect such fees less an administrative fee of an amount
equal to one percent (1%) of the total '911 fee collected by BellSouth.
Section 3. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 365.171, Florida Statutes,
BellSouth shall provide to the County on quarterly basis a list of the names, addresses, and
telephone numbers of any and all subscribers who have identified to BellSouth their refusal to
pay the "911" fee.
Section 4. That pursuant to the authority set forth within Section 365.171, Florida
Statutes, Indian River County hereby indemnifies and holds harmless BellSouth Business
Systems, Inc. against liability for damages resulting from or in connection with "911" service or
identification of telephone numbers, addresses, or names associated with any person accessing
"911" service, except if BellSouth acts with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton
and willful disregard of human rights, safety or property in providing such services.
Section 5. That the Board hereby authorizes that a letter be sent to BellSouth notifying
them of the imposition of the fee, that the fees shall be collected by BellSouth less an
administrative fee, that BellSouth shall provide the County with the above -referenced list and
request written acknowledgment from BellSouth regarding the imposed fees and other matters
set forth within the letter.
September 3, 2002
e
107
rof
•
Section 6. SEVERABILITY
If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution is held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, then said holding shall in no way affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution.
Section 7 EFFECTIVE DATE
This Resolution shall become effective October 1, 2002.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner Adams who moved
its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Ruth M Stanbridge Aye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht /dye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn Aye
Gi nn and, upon being put to
The Chairman thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
September ,2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Ruth M. Stanbridge
Chairman
September 3, 2002
Indian River Co.
Approved
Date
Admin.
Cra
li✓
{j
j
_
County Atty.
Wei'
/fIllatrait.
Budget
g1 -
Dept.
Risk Mgr.
/
6
General Svcs.
Purchasing
September 3, 2002
•
11.B.2. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS/DIVISION OF
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT - FY 2002/03 EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT, PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND
(EMPA) BASE GRANT AGREEMENT (STATE AND FEDERALLY
FUNDED SUBGRANT AGREEMENT)
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 20, 2002:
TO: Honorable Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James Chandler, County Administrator
THROUGH: John King, Director
1
Department of Emerge f • e 'ces
FROM: Nathan McCollum, Emergency Management Coordinator
Department of Emergency Services
DATE: August 20, 2002
SUBJECT: Approval of State & Federally Funded Subgrant Agreement -Contract Number 03BG-04-10-40 01 031
Annually, the Department of Community Affairs/Division of Emergency Management administers the Emergency Management,
Preparedness and Assistance Trust Fund Base Grant Agreement (EMPA) and the Emergency Management Preparedness Grant
(EMPG) with each Florida county following authorization in Chapter 252, Florida Statutes. For the second year, the Division
of Emergency Management has combined the two agreements into one contract. The funding for EMPA and EMPG are used
to enhance and improve local emergency management mitigation, planning, response and recovery for Indian River County.
The attached agreement awards Indian River County a net total of $103,196.00 for FY 02/03. A breakdown of the award is
as follows:
The EMPG funding is not included because the United States Congress is not scheduled to allocate funding until after October
1, 2002. The grant amount and staff funding allocation recommendations will be brought before the Board when received from
the State Division of Emergency Management
RECOMMENDATION:
In order to continue providing a strong local Emergency Management Division program in Indian River County, staff
recommends approval of the FY 02/03 EMPA portion of the State & Federally Funded Subgrant Agreement and funds to be
allocated as follows:
1. Continued funding of salaries and benefits ($103,196.00) of the existing Emergency Management Planner position and
the existing Emergency Management Assistant position detailed in the 001-238 General Fund budget account.
2. Authorize Emergency Services Director John King as the contract manager for this agreement.
September 3, 2002
109
I
•
ITEM
COST
FY 02/03 EMPA Agreement
$105,806.00
Annual Required
Satellite Cost
$ ( 2,610.00)
Net Total
$103,196.00
The EMPG funding is not included because the United States Congress is not scheduled to allocate funding until after October
1, 2002. The grant amount and staff funding allocation recommendations will be brought before the Board when received from
the State Division of Emergency Management
RECOMMENDATION:
In order to continue providing a strong local Emergency Management Division program in Indian River County, staff
recommends approval of the FY 02/03 EMPA portion of the State & Federally Funded Subgrant Agreement and funds to be
allocated as follows:
1. Continued funding of salaries and benefits ($103,196.00) of the existing Emergency Management Planner position and
the existing Emergency Management Assistant position detailed in the 001-238 General Fund budget account.
2. Authorize Emergency Services Director John King as the contract manager for this agreement.
September 3, 2002
109
I
•
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Four (4) copies of the FY 02/03 State & Federally Funded Subgrant Agreement
2. Cover Letter From Department of Community Affairs/DEM.
3. Response to the Office of Management & Budget Grant Sheet.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the FY
02/03 EMPA portion of the State & Federally Funded Subgrant
Agreement with funds allocated as set out and recommended in
the above memorandum.
PARTIALLY EXECUTED DOCUMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.C.1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL - STAINLESS STEEL
TOILETS AND LAVATORIES - WAIVE SEALED BIDS - U. S. SUPPLY
COMPANY, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 2002:
Date: August 26, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator %%
From. Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director (bezerlrz/ u.c
Subject: Request to use Three Written Quotes in Lieu of Sealed Bids forVVVthe Purchase
of Stainless Steel Toilets and Lavatories for the County Jail
BACKGROUND:
Attached, please find copies of written quotes that Building and Grounds got for acquisition of
stainless steel toilet (8) and lavatories (16) to replace porcelain fixtures in Building "C" of the
County Jail.
•
These replacements are approved in the currentbudget, and by allowing the purchase via the
written quotes, it would allow us to expedite the replacements while still utilizing competitive
prices. As noted by Mr. Lynn Williams's memorandum, there is currently $19,000, which was
budgeted for this purpose.
September 3, 2002
•
ihhh
RECONLVTFNDATION:
Based on having at least three competitive written quotes, staff recommends waiving the
requirement for sealed bids and award the purchase of toilets and lavatories to the lowest quote
in the amount of $11,145.92* to U.S. Supply Company, Inc
*Note: The difference between the $10,703.58 shown in the quote and the $11,145.92 requested is due to needing
16 lavatories as opposed to 15 quoted.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY Vice
Chairman Tippin, the Board unanimously waived the
requirement for sealed bids (based on having at least three
competitive written quotes) and awarded the purchase of
stainless steel toilets and lavatories to the lowest quote in the
amount of $11,145.92 to U. S. Supply Company, Inc., as
recommended in the memorandum.
11.C.2. NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY - FINAL PAYMENT AND
RELEASE OF RETAINAGE - CHILBERG CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 2002:
Date: August 27, 2002
To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Thru: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
From Thomas W. Frame, General Services Directorar,,fc u.
Subject: Final Payment and Release of Retainage - Chilberg Construction Co., Inc ,
North County Library
•
BACKGROUND:
Attached, please find a request for final payment and release of the remaining amount of
retainage by Chilberg Construction Co., Inc., for the North County Library Addition. All work
contracted through Chilberg Construction Co. has been completed including the punch list of
corrections
Specifically, Chilberg Construction Co. is requesting the final payment of $15,609.40 (amount of
last change order # 4) for payment in full, excluding retainage, for the final contract amount of
September 3, 2002
111
•
0
$1,315,773.77. In addition, approval for release of the remaining retainage in the amount of
S29,592.25 is requested. These two items equal a sum of $45,201.65, the total amount of
payment requested.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the completion of the punch list and certification of both the request for payment and
the remaining retainage by Architect (John Binkley with Edlund & Dritenbas), staff recommends
approval of the final payment of $15,609.40 and $29,592.25 representing the remaining retainage
for a total of $45,201.65.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the
final payment of $15,609.40 and $29,592.25 representing the
remaining retainage for a total of $45,201.65, to Chilberg
Construction Co., Inc., as recommended in the memorandum.
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.C.3. MAIN LIBRARY - FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE OF
RETAINAGE - BILL BRYANT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 2002
Date:
To:
Thru:
From.
Subject:
August 26, 2002
The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Thomas W. Frame, General Services Director
Final Payment and Release of Retainage - Bill Bryant & Associates, Main
Library
BACKGROUND:
Attached, please find a request for final payment and release of the remaining 50 % of accrued
retainage by Bill Bryant & Associates, Inc., for the Main Library Addition. All work contracted
through Bill Bryant and Associates has been completed including the punch list of corrections.
September 3, 2002
112
Specifically Bill Bryant and Associates are requesting the final payment of $6,940.17 for
payment in full, excluding retainage, for the final contract amount of $1 658,753.77. In addition,
approval for release of the remaining retainage (50 %) in the amount of $82,590.68 is requested.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the completion of the punch list and certification of both the request for payment and
the remaining retainage by Architect (Dow -Howell), staff recommends approval of the final
payment of $6,940.17 and $82,590.68 representing the remaining retainage.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved final
payment of $6,940.17 and $82,590.68 to Bill Bryant &
Associates, Inc., as recommended in the memorandum.
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.G.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-064 - FLORIDA RECREATION
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) - WEST
WABASSO PARK IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 2
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 2002:
TO: James E Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
Terry B. Thompson,
Capital Projects Manager
FROM: G. Sean McGuire, P EY
Project Engineer C '?
SUBJECT: West Wabasso Park Improvements — Phase 2
Resolution for FRDAP Funds
DATE August 27, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
County staff is preparing a grant application to submit to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection's Division of Recreation and Parks for funding consideration through their Florida Recreation
September 3, 2002
Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) for improvements at West Wabasso Park. Proposed
improvements include a new large pavilion, new bicycle trail, restroom renovation, improved parking and
new landscaping.
The application will be scored according to prescribed criteria for FRDAP grants. Ten points will be
gained if the Board of County Commissioners adopts the attached resolution to schedule and complete
the project should it receive program funds.
The application deadline is September 13, 2002.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
The total estimated cost of the proposed improvements is $150,000.00. The grant application will request
75% funding of actual cost with a 25% match from the County.
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the resolution and authorize the Chairman to sign it.
Funding will be from account #315-210-572-068.04
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution No. 2002-064 to schedule and complete
improvements at West Wabasso Park if the project receives
funds from the Florida Recreation Development Assistance
Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 064
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA TO SCHEDULE AND COMPLETE
IMPROVEMENTS AT WEST WABASSO PARK IF THE PROJECT
RECEIVES FUNDS FROM THE FLORIDA RECREATION
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida wishes
to construct the following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of Indian River
County and the State of Florida:
Project Title: West Wabasso Park Improvements — Phase 2
Total Estimated Cost: $150,000.00
Description: This project includes the construction of a new large picnic
pavilion, a new bicycle trail, renovation of an existing
building for restrooms, improvements to existing parking
areas, and the addition of new landscaping.
AND, Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program funds are needed to fund
the project
September 3, 2002
114
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners that County
staff shall make application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for 75% of
the actual cost through their Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program.
AND, be it further resolved that the Board of County Commissioners will schedule and
complete the project, If the project receives program funds.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R Macht Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner Caroline D. Ginn
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 3rd day of
September, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
t cif
By: C ;.f`7. :> c:..;:...
Ruth M. Stanbridge, Chairman()
Attest: J.K. Barton, Clerk
Indian River County
Approved
Administration
Risk Management
Budget
Deputy Clerk
Public Works
Capital Projects
11.G.2. ANSLEY PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO 13TH
STREET S.W.
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 27, 2002:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Developer's Agreement for Improvements to 13th Street SW
- Ansley Park Development
DATE: August 27, 2002
September 3, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
A developer, Ansley Park Development Corporation, is planning to
develope- a Planned Residential Development named Ansley Park,
located along the north side of 13th Street SW and west of 27th
Avenue SW.
The developer will donate 30'
north side of 13th Street SW,
additional right-of-way along
the Developer for the sum of
per acre for .69 acres.
of additional right-of-way along the
and the County will purchase 30' of
the north side of 13th Street SW from
$14,020.80, which equates to $20,320
The developer shall also pave approximately 1,080 LF of 13th Street
SW from 27th Avenue to the development entrance road. The County
shall pay $30,000 of the cost (approximately 500 of the cost at
developer's cost) and the developer shall pay the remainder.
The attached developer's agreement has been prepared to identify
Developer and County responsibilities. This Agreement is similar to
previous developer's agreements along County Collector Roadways.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The Alternatives presented are:
Alternative No. 1
Approve the Developer's Agreement.
Alternative No. 2
Deny Approval
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the Developer's
Agreement is approved. Funding to be from Fund 109 -Gas Tax Revenue
for road paving and 1 -cent Local Option Sales Tax Revenue for
right-of-way.
ATTACHMENT
1. Developer's Agreement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
Developer's Agreement with Ansley Park Development
Corporation for improvements to 13th Street SW, as
recommended in the memorandum. (Alternative No. 1)
September 3, 2002
116
1
•
DOCUMENTS WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIV ED (r/ -
11.G.3. HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, INC. - DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 26, 2002:
TO: James Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P E , Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Developer's Agreement — Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River
County
DATE: August 26, 2002
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Humane Society is constructing a new facility on 77th Street between 58th Avenue and 66th
Avenue. A joint effort to pave 77th Street along this one -mile length was tentatively considered by
the Board of County Commissioners on January 16, 2001. Since that time, the Humane Society has
contracted with a civil engineering firm, Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc of Vero Beach to
design and obtain three competitive bids for the paving. The attached developer's agreement has
also been prepared by staff to establish the funding responsibilities, project management and
engineering, stormwater treatment, and miscellaneous items.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The attached Developer's Agreement provides for the Humane Society providing project
management and a portion of the stormwater treatment on their 38 -acre site. The County will fund
the engineering design costs of $28,500.00 and approximately $460,000.00 of the construction costs
A proposed mining operation south of 77th Street will pay $36,467.00 of the paving costs. A
payment bond and performance bond will cost $6,040.00 if the County wants them included. The
total County cost with bonds will be $494 540.00. Cathco of Vero Beach will be the contractor for
the Humane Society. The County Road and Bridge Division will clear the right-of-way. The County
Traffic Engineering Division will stripe and sign the new paved road. The County Annual Paving
Contractor will supply and install the asphalt.
The alternatives presented are as follows:
Alternative No. 1—Approve the Developer's Agreement with the option of the contractor providing
a Performance Bond and Payment Bond at additional cost of $6,040.00.
Alternative No. 2 — Deny the approval of the Developer's Agreement.
September 3, 2002
117
Eli
•
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 whereby the Developer's Agreement is approved with the
bonds included. County funding of $494,540.00 will be from Fund 109, Gas Tax Revenue
ATTACHMENTS
1. Developer's Agreement with exhibits
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
Developer's Agreement with Humane Society of Vero Beach
and Indian River County, Inc., as recommended in the
memorandum. (Alternative No. 1)
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERIC TO THE BOARD
11.11.1. THE INLET AT SEBASTIAN, LLC - DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION ON US#1,
ROSELAND ROAD AND OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 1, 2002:
August 1, 2002
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
W. ERIK OLSON
DIRECTOR OF L�7 N 1 Y SERVICES
PREPARED
AND STAFFED
BY:
AARON J. BOWLES, P E
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITH INLET AT SEBASTIAN, LLC (FOR
WATER MAIN INSTALLATION ON U.S.#1, ROSELAND ROAD AND OLD
DIXIE HIGHWAY)
September 3, 2002
•
RACKGROTTND & ANALYSTS
Inlet at Sebastian, LLC is proposing a residential development located from Indian River Drive to just west of
Old Dixie Highway, south of Roseland Road. A master planned water main had previously been scheduled for
construction along Roseland Road and Old Dixie Highway on an as -needed basis driven by development.
Funding of master planned water mains enables developers to extend an over -sized water main, as proposed in the
Water and Wastewater Mater Plan, to their property. As future development continues adjacent to the proposed
water main and developers connect, the required line extension fees will be applied such that a certain portion of
the subject water main's costs will be reimbursed to the County.
Attached is a proposed Developer's Agreement with Inlet at Sebastian, LLC for reimbursement of a portion of
the subject water main. Upon payment of capacity charges, the Developer's Agreement is stipulated to reimburse
the Developer for the County's share of the water main based on itemized invoices of installed materials on a
percentage complete basis -less 10% retainage, monthly, with final payment and release of retainage at the time
said facilities are dedicated to the County (S C — I .A of attached agreement). Capacity charges for the subject site
total $335,872.00.
As shown in Exhibit - B of the attached Agreement, the County's share and Developer's share for
installing the recommended improvements are tabulated below and included in the attached Developer's
Agreement as follows:
RFC OMMFNDATTON•
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Developer's agreement as presented & authorizes the Chairman to execute the same.
T,TST CDF ATTACHMENTS•
Attachment -A. Proposed Developer's Agreement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Developer's Agreement with The Inlet at Sebastian,
LLC, and authorized the Chairman to execute the same, as
recommended in the memorandum.
Chairman Stanbridge specified that, although this development had been referred to
the Historic Resources Committee, this has not come before the Committee yet.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
•
September 3, 2002
119
(ji1 l 2
Description
Water
Distribution
System':'
Developer's Share
$11,925.00
County's Share
$472,714.50
Total
Project Cost
5484,639.50
Less Capacity Charges
$335,872.00
Total County Output
$136,842.50
RFC OMMFNDATTON•
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the attached Developer's agreement as presented & authorizes the Chairman to execute the same.
T,TST CDF ATTACHMENTS•
Attachment -A. Proposed Developer's Agreement
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved the
proposed Developer's Agreement with The Inlet at Sebastian,
LLC, and authorized the Chairman to execute the same, as
recommended in the memorandum.
Chairman Stanbridge specified that, although this development had been referred to
the Historic Resources Committee, this has not come before the Committee yet.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
•
September 3, 2002
119
(ji1 l 2
11.H.2. NORTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT
(REVERSE OSMOSIS) - IMPLEMENTATION OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RESOLUTION
AGREEMENT - WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 2 CAMP DRESSER &
McKEE, INC. - WORK AUTHORIZATION MASTELLER, MOLER &
REED, INC. - DESIGN OF DEMINERALIZED-CONCENTRATE
DISCHARGE LINE AUTHORIZED
The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 14 2002:
Date: Wednesday August 14, 2002
To:
Thru•
Prepared and
Staffed By:
Subject:
James E. Chandler
County Administratorz
W Erik Olson\
Director of Utili Services t1
Steven J. Doyle, P.E.
Assistant Director of Utilities
Work Authorizations to Camp D esser & McKee Inc. and Masteller, Moler & Reed
Inc. to Implement Various Phases of the Resolution Agreement between the Florida
Depaitsnent of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and Indian River County for the
North Reverse Osmosis Water Plant
Rackground•
On June 4, 2002 the Board of County Commissioners entered into a `Resolution Agreement' with the
Florida Depai tment of Environmental Protection for the North Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant
(WTP) to manage RO byproduct (aka demineralized concentrate or brine).
In the process of treating our drinking water, water that is a byproduct of treatment, is rejected in the
form of `brine', a salty concentrate left over from the treatment process. This `brine' has been, for a
number of years, discharged into the Indian River Lagoon. With the County and State's goals of restoring
and protecting the Indian River Lagoon, the County and the State Depai tuuent of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), have developed a partnership that works towards the elimination of these direct
discharges of brine into the Lagoon. This partnership along with goals & objectives is outlined in the
Resolution Agreement that was approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
Analysis•
The Resolution Agreement approved by the Board of County Commissioners on June 4, 2002 contains
several milestone dates that must be demonstrated with associated penalties in the event that these
milestones are not met. The Resolution Agreement has several Phases and subtasks, Phase A through F.
The attached Gantt chart shows the associated timeline for each phase. The following table provides a brief
description of each task and the anticipated assignment of work.
September 3, 2002
120
i ��
The first milestone, Phase A, includes submittal of the necessary pc it applications with supporting
documentation for the relocation of the discharge point to the Indian River Farms Water Control District
(IRFWCD) North Relief Canal. CDM Work Authorization No. 2 includes the engineering services
necessary to prepare the required permit documents for submittal to FDEP and IRFWCD. CDM's services
also include a technical evaluation of the proposed Integrated Water Resources Program, which the Utilities
Department intends to implement to supplement reclaimed water used in golf courses imgation. Mixing
scenarios utilizing concentrate and storm water from the North Relief Canal will be identified. Staff has
solicited proposals from local surveyors to prepare the base maps for implementation of Phase A, Step 2 and
Masteller, Moler .& Reed Inc. has been selected as the surveyor. Utility Staff will be designing and
permitting the pipeline from the WTP to the Canal.
Recommendation:
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following:
a) Approve Work Authorization No. 2 to the firm Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CMD Inc.) in the
amount of $179,900.00 for assistance in permitting and bench top computer modeling related
to Phase -A, Step 1 and Phase -C of the Resolution Agreement.
b) Authorize Utility Staff to begin design of the demineralized-concentrate discharge line from the
North RO WTP to the North Relief Canal pursuant to Phase -A, Step 2 of the Resolution.
c) Approve Work Authorization to the firm Masteller, Moler & Reed Inc. in the amount of
$19,250.00 for Surveying Services related to Phase -A, Step 2 of the Resolution Agreement.
d) Authorize the Chairman to execute the Attached Work Authorizations.
T,ist of Attachments.
Attachment -A Work Authorization No. 2 from CDM Inc. dated June 14, 2002.
Attachment -B Work Authorization from Masteller, Moler & Reed Inc dated Aug 7, 2002.
Attachment -C Gantt Chart of Anticipated Milestone Dates for the Resolution Agreement
Acrniint Information:
•
Description Arrniint Nn Amount
Capacity Charge Fund —Integrated Water Resource Project 471-000-169-538 $199,150.00
September 3, 2002
121
Li
r
f
ncnuiauon
Phase
item i
Task Description
Assignment
Commencement
BCC Approves Resolution
Department of Environmental
Agreement with Florida
Protection (FDEP)
date
Approved on June 4, 2002. Effective start
Phase A, Step 1
Submit Permit Modification to FDEP for Major Modification
to discharge demineralized-concentrate to the North Relief
Canal.
a.)
and
June
CDM Inc.
Analysis
12 2002.
to prepare Permit Documents
to FDEP
Phase A, Step 2
Design & permitting the demineralized-concentrate discharge
to the North Relief Canal
a.) Masteller,
Surveying
b.) Utility
Moler
Services
Staff
& Reed Inc. to perform
Perform
Phase B
Construction
North
Relief
of a
Canal
demineralized-concentrate pipeline to the
Utility
Staff
to
Design
to Bid construction plans
Phase C
Computer
canal
design
Modeling
cnteria
& Bench -top
for blending
Analysis to determine
of Demineralized-
in-
a)
and
CDM
analysis.
Inc.
to model hydraulics, blending
concentrate and Stormwater
Permitting of a Control
along with the Design
Structure
&
b.)
determined.
Design
of canal structures to be
Phase D
Complete
Canal for
Demineralized
the
construction of Control Structure in North Relief
Blending and Retention of Commingled
Concentrate & Stormwater
To Be Determined
Phase E
Design & Permitting
& Reclaim
I.e. man-made
of Commingled
Water Treatment System at
wetlands, retention pond
Concentrate/Stormwater
the County's
or equivalent.
RIB Site.
To Be Determined
Phase F
Construction of Concentrate/
Retention System at the
Stormwater/
County's
Reclaim Water
RIB Site.
To Be Determined
Closure
Resolution Agreement Completed
The first milestone, Phase A, includes submittal of the necessary pc it applications with supporting
documentation for the relocation of the discharge point to the Indian River Farms Water Control District
(IRFWCD) North Relief Canal. CDM Work Authorization No. 2 includes the engineering services
necessary to prepare the required permit documents for submittal to FDEP and IRFWCD. CDM's services
also include a technical evaluation of the proposed Integrated Water Resources Program, which the Utilities
Department intends to implement to supplement reclaimed water used in golf courses imgation. Mixing
scenarios utilizing concentrate and storm water from the North Relief Canal will be identified. Staff has
solicited proposals from local surveyors to prepare the base maps for implementation of Phase A, Step 2 and
Masteller, Moler .& Reed Inc. has been selected as the surveyor. Utility Staff will be designing and
permitting the pipeline from the WTP to the Canal.
Recommendation:
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following:
a) Approve Work Authorization No. 2 to the firm Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CMD Inc.) in the
amount of $179,900.00 for assistance in permitting and bench top computer modeling related
to Phase -A, Step 1 and Phase -C of the Resolution Agreement.
b) Authorize Utility Staff to begin design of the demineralized-concentrate discharge line from the
North RO WTP to the North Relief Canal pursuant to Phase -A, Step 2 of the Resolution.
c) Approve Work Authorization to the firm Masteller, Moler & Reed Inc. in the amount of
$19,250.00 for Surveying Services related to Phase -A, Step 2 of the Resolution Agreement.
d) Authorize the Chairman to execute the Attached Work Authorizations.
T,ist of Attachments.
Attachment -A Work Authorization No. 2 from CDM Inc. dated June 14, 2002.
Attachment -B Work Authorization from Masteller, Moler & Reed Inc dated Aug 7, 2002.
Attachment -C Gantt Chart of Anticipated Milestone Dates for the Resolution Agreement
Acrniint Information:
•
Description Arrniint Nn Amount
Capacity Charge Fund —Integrated Water Resource Project 471-000-169-538 $199,150.00
September 3, 2002
121
Li
r
f
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved a) Work
Authorization No. 2 with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM)
in the amount of $179,900 for assistance in permitting and
bench top computer modeling related to Phase -A, Step 1 and
Phase -C of the Resolution Agreement; b) authorized Utility
Staff to begin design of the demineralized-concentrate
discharge line from the North County RO Water Treatment
Plant to the North Relief Canal pursuant to Phase -A, Step 2 of
the Resolution; c) Work Authorization to the firm Masteller,
Moler & Reed, Inc., in the amount of $19,250 for surveying
services related to Phase -A Step 2 ofthe Resolution Agreement;
and d) authorized the Chairman to execute the Work
Authorizations, all as recommended in the Memorandum.
WORK AUTHORIZATIONS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13.A. CHAIRMAN STANBRIDGE - UPDATES - PATRIOT'S DAY,
SEPTEMBER 11th
Chairman Stanbridge advised that there is a public law naming September 11th
"Patriot's Day" and there will be several activities going on in the county. She wanted to
remind everyone of those activities and she expected they will be seeing the times and places
in the newspapers.
September 3, 2002
122
rta
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board would
reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
There being no further business, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Chairman
adjourned the meeting at 12:23 P.M.
ATTEST:
Minutes approved ,/ - /" -
September 3, 2002