Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-205 02 0 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BEACH PRESERVATION PLAN WORK ORDER NO, 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, INC . AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Pursuant to the Professional Services Agreement (MASTER AGREEMENT) dated December 13 , 2005 , by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, and APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, INC . , with a Florida office in WEST PALM BEACH, FL. , hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT, this WORK ORDER No . 2 is an extension of and hereby becomes a part of the MASTER AGREEMENT as follows : SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION Services included in this Work Order are specified in the attached Scope of Work included as Exhibit "A" SECTION II - COUNTY OBLIGATIONS The COUNTY agrees to provide the CONSULTANT with the following material, data, or services as required in connection with the work to be performed under this Work Order: A. Currently available studies, survey drawings, plans, calculations, and other data pertinent to the Project. B . Review and comment on CONSULTANTS work in a timely fashion . SECTION III SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT will provide services as specified in the attached Scope of Work included as Exhibit "A" SECTION IV - TIME FOR COMPLETION After the COUNTY issues a written authorization to proceed, all work shall be completed on or before November 1 , 2006 unless project delays extend the time of completion. C:\DOCUM E-I \A DMINI-I \I.00AIS-I \TEMP\ATM WORK ORDER f I DOC SECTION V COMPENSATION The COUNTY agrees to pay, and the CONSULTANT agrees to accept fees for services rendered according to the attached Cost Proposal included as Exhibit `B". SECTION VI - PARTIAL PAYMENTS The COUNTY shall make monthly partial payments to the CONSULTANT for all authorized work pertaining directly to this project performed during the previous calendar month The CONSULTANT shall submit invoices monthly for services performed and expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement during the prior month. The CONSULTANT shall submit duly certified invoices to the Director of the Public Works Department. For lump sum line items, the amount submitted shall be the prorated amount due for all work performed to date under this phase, determined by applying the percentage of the work completed as certified by the CONSULTANT, to the total due for this phase of the work. For each invoice, the CONSULTANT shall certify that the total invoice amount is correct. The amount of the partial payment due the CONSULTANT for the work performed Io- date under these phases shall be an amount calculated in accordance with the previous paragraph, less ten percent ( 10%) of the invoice amount thus determined, which shall be withheld by the COUNTY as retainage, and less previous payments. The ten percent ( 10%) retainage withheld shall be paid in full to the CONSULTANT by the COUNTY, within forty-five days after the date of final acceptance of the work by the Director of Public Works . Billings shall be payable in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Florida Statutes section 218 .70 et. seq. at not less than monthly intervals. No payment shall be made unless the Public Works Director has received and approved the work products required under the "Scope of Services" herein. C:\DOCUME-1 \ADMINI-1 \LOCALS-1 \TEMP\ATM WORK ORDEP22.DOC SECTION VII - RELATIONSHIP TO MASTER AGREEMENT AND LAWS OF FLORIDA Pursuant to paragraph 1 .4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any WORK ORDER shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual WORK ORDER as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents this 13th day of June 2006. APPLIED TECHNOLOGY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND MANAGEMENT, INC . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 400 S . AUSTRALIAN AVE. WEST PALM BEACH, F/L� 33401 BY : BY: G _f Michael Jenkins, Ph.D . Gary C . Wheeler Coastal Engineering Team Leader Vice Chairman ; s a �C� w n�u�� • . JEFFREY K. BARTON CLERK Attest : DEPUTY CLERt� + APPROVED a � . '� � ®rak BY *JepEhIA. N p�YJ Baird, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal acienu cy: Marian AF=11 Assistant County Attorney C:\DOCOME--IWDMMI- I \LOCAIS- I \TEMP\ATM WORK ORDER12.DOC EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES C:\DOCUME- 1 \ADMINI-1 \LOCALS- ] UEMPWTM WORKORDER42.DOC SCOPE OF WORK Indian River County Beach Preservation Project - Sectors 1 & 2 Post-Construction Monitoring Services Introduction: The Indian River County Sectors 1 & 2 Beach Renourishment project is located along the shoreline south of Sebastian Inlet, at Sebastian Inlet State Park and unincorporated Ambersand Beach and extends between FDEP reference monuments R-3 . 5 and R-17 . Renourishment of the project will occur within the 06-07 dredging season . This scope of services details pre- and post construction biological monitoring tasks required under state and federal permit for this project. Task 1 - Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Plan The objectives of the nearshore hardbottom monitoring program are to describe the abundance and biodiversity of the benthic flora and fauna within the influence of the predicted equilibrium toe of fill (ETOF), turbidity mixing zone, and downdrift of the project fill area; evaluate the extent of the ETOF as compared to the predicted ETOF, assess the potential burial of hardbottom due to beach profile adjustment; assess secondary impacts to hardbottom communities due to sedimentation seaward of the ETOF; assess secondary impacts to hardbottom communities due to the longshore spreading of beach fill material downdrift of the project area; and to assess the potential direct impacts to nearshore hardbottom communities due to pipeline placement. Permanent CrossShore Transects: Video and Stili Photographic Documentation Five, 150-meter long transects shall be located within the project area : R-5, R-6. 5 , R-8, R-9. 5 , and R-10.5 . One transect shall be located downdrift of the project area at R-12, and two reference transects shall be established: one at R-19 . 5 and one at R-22 . The transects shall be permanently established using pins or rods to mark each 0 point at the landward edge of exposed nearshore hardbottom . If a ledge exists at the nearshore hardbottom edge, the 0 point shall be located on the top (i .e. crest) of the nearshore hardbottom ledge on the horizontal surface . Pins will then be installed along all transects at the 5-meter mark, 10-meter mark, and every 10 meters until 100 meters, with an additional pin installed at 125 meters and one at 150 meters. The pins shall extend a minimum of 30 cm above the hardbottom surface. No pins shall be located within the sand gaps between hardbottom ridges. If significant sand gaps (i.e. troughs) occur between the hardbottom ridges, a pin shall be placed at the seaward edge of the first hardbottom ridge, and installation of pins will recommence at the next hardbottom ridge with a pin at the 0 mark (crest or edge of exposed hardbottom) . Pin installation will then continue at 5 meters from the second 0 mark, and then every 10 meters until the 100 meter mark, with additional pins at 125 meters and 150 meters. DGPS positioning will be obtained for the landward edge (0 mark) and seaward edge of the first nearshore hardbottom ridge, and for all subsequent hardbottom ridges located seaward along the 150- meter transect. C:Wm=erm and 8e ngsNonaUwQlLocW 3ehirgff mp ry \Memel Files10LK2ao2 sow FMAL. o 1 J The 150-meter transects shall be sampled using digital video in progressive scan mode. The diver shall swim at a speed of approximately 6 meter/min with a constant camera distance of 25 cm above bottom . If the diver is moved off the transect by surge, the diver shall return to the point where he/she was disturbed by the wave action , and resume filming at that point. The video transects shall be reviewed during the course of the survey to ensure that there are no gaps in the data due to diver error and that the quality of the video is acceptable for video analysis. Any missing video transect data or poor quality video shall be refilmed during the course of the monitoring event. Landscape panoramic views shall be recorded with the digital video camera at the start and end of each transect, and at each interruption of the transect by a sand gap/recommencement at the next hardbottom ridge. Close-up digital still video/photographs shall be obtained of representative benthos along the transect to aid in identification during video analysis. Still photographs shall be obtained using the digital video camera or digital still camera at all quadrat locations, vertical ledges, large Oculina spp. colonies or Siderastrea siderea colonies along the transect or adjacent to transect (within underwater visibility during transect establishment) , and changes in benthic landscape along the transect. Voucher sampling of macroalgae shall be conducted to assist with video identification of macroalgae genera . Video Transect Analysis During each monitoring even , two, 20-meter long segments of the video transect shall be quantitatively analyzed using PointCount'99 or a comparable software package based upon the random point count method for estimation of percent cover from digitally frame- grabbed underwater video images. The first 20-meter segment shall correspond to the first 20 meters of hardbottom (commence at the 0 point at the exposed nearshore hardbottom edge and continue to the 20-meter mark) . The second 20-meter segment shall cross hardbottom between 50 and 100 meters along each transect. The exact location of the second 20-meter segment shall be determined at the time of transect establishment based upon the benthic landscape and location of hardbottom ridges along the transect, and shall be referenced to the nearest pin along the transect for repeated occupation of the same stretch of transect for video analysis. DGPS positioning will be obtained for the start point of the second 20-meter segment along each transect. Each 20-meter segment shall result in approximately 100 non-overlapping frame- grabbed images. A unique set of 20 random points shall be generated at the time of frame-grabbing and stored with each set of images so that the same points are assessed during each monitoring event. This also ensures that each person examining a particular image will view the same points, thereby allowing for double-blind counting for quality assurance and control purposes. Ten percent (10%) of the images shall be counted by two scorers to assess inter-observer variability. An estimate of percent cover (projected to the surface) will be performed for each image according to the following functional groups/categories: scleractinian corals (to the genus level), octocorals, macroalgae (to the genus level if possible, if not, then according to the following breakdown : calcareous red , calcareous green , fleshy brown, fleshy red , fleshy green) , microalgae/cyanobacteria , sponges, tunicates, hydroids, wormrock, zoanthids, urchins, holothuroids, and substrate. Substrate shall be broken down into the following categories: unconsolidated substrate (rubble/shell hash , rhodoliths) , sediment over C:U)o enls aml Se ngslIona wVkLocal SottugslTemporary traem Fllea\OMEW a FINAL.Eoc 2 hardbottom, sediment over benthos (where the underlying fauna cannot be identified due to the sediment cover) , and sand . The remainder of the 150-meter video transect shall be reviewed for qualitative changes in benthic community cover/composition in comparison to the pre-construction surveys, previous annual surveys, and the reference sites. If the qualitative review of the video transect suggests sedimentation impacts or cross-shore transport of sediments over the benthic community along the remaining portions of the transect, and the results of the sedimentation monitoring and quadrat assessments indicate burial of hardbottom communities, additional quantitative analysis of the video transects shall be required as directed by the Department to determine the extent of the project-related impacts. Quadrat sampling During each survey , a 0.25 square meter gridded quadrat will be sampled by the diver/biologist at a several point-intercept locations along the 150-meter long transects. The first quadrat will be located at the nearshore hardbottom edge . If the hardbottom edge consists of a vertical ledge, one quadrat will be located along the vertical/sub- vertical face, a second quadrat will be located at the top of the ledge along at the horizontal face of the ledge, and the third quadrat shall be placed at the 5-meter mark along the transect. Additional quadrat sampling shall occur along each transect to capture changes in benthic landscape (physical relief, species dominance/abundance, presence of stony corals/octocorals along or immediate adjacent to the transect) . If the transect crosses a sand gap (i.e. trough) , a quadrat shall be sampled at the seaward edge of the exposed hardbottom , and at the west edge of hardbottom east of the sand gap (i . e. on the horizontal face of the crest of the next ledge). The distance across the sand gap shall be noted and is included within the 150-meter length of the transect. Quadrats shall not be placed in the sand gaps between hardbottom ridges. Each 150- meter transect shall have approximately 9-10 quadrats. A list of the locations of the quadrats along each transect with a description of the quadrat location/benthic community shall be provided to the Department after transect establishment. Parameters for Quadrat Sampling Within each quadrat, visual estimate of percent cover and genus/species identification shall be performed in-situ for the following functional groups: macroalgae (overall percent cover and identification/percent cover of two dominant species within quadrat), microalgae/cyanobacteria, encrusting calcareous algae, sponges (genus level) , with a separate assessment of percent cover of boring sponge (Cliona spp) , tunicates (with identification of dominant genera), zoanthids (genus level), hydroids, wormrock (Phragmatopoma lapidosa) , octocorals (genus level) , and scleractinian corals (species level) . Individual counts shall be conducted for all octocorals, scleractinian corals, sponges (not including Cliona spp. which shall be assessed for percent cover) , solitary tunicates, urchins, and holothuroids within the quadrat. Scleractinian corals and octocorals shall also be assessed for size class distribution : size class 1 : < 5 cm diameter of scleractinian/height of octocoral ; size class 2 : 5 cm to 15 cm diameter of scleractinian/height of octocoral; size class 3: 15 to 25 cm diameter of scleractinian/height of octocoral; and size Gass 4: >25 cm diameter of scleractinian/height of octocoral) . Maximum and average algal height of the two C1Do eft ar WhVsyona wgIL=1 Settlrgl% wrwy kte RmXOIK2M2 sox FPlAI.d 3 dominant macroalgal species shall also be recorded . Average algal height shall be estimated by five measurements. Percent cover of substrate, unconsolidated substrate (rubble, shell hash, rhodoliths), sand and sediment over hardbottom shall be recorded . The maximum physical relief of hardbottom from the lowest point to highest point in the quadrat, shall be measured to the nearest centimeter. Sediment accumulation measurements will be performed within all quadrats located on the flat (horizontal) surface of hardbottom along each transect. Five random measurements of sediment thickness will be performed with each quadrat using a ruler to measure to the nearest cm. Continuous layers of sediment less than 1 cm covering the hardbottom surface and benthos shall be recorded . Sediment accumulation measurements shall also be recorded at each pin along the transect and at 1 -meter west of each pin (with the exception of the pins marking the nearshore hardbottom edge) using a ruler to measure to the nearest cm. Monitoring Schedule Monitoring events shall consist of a pre-construction survey conducted in the summer prior to construction , an immediate post-construction survey conducting during the summer after project completion (May 1 through September 30), and three subsequent annual post-construction monitoring events conducted during the summer months (May 1 through September 30). This proposal specifically addresses monitoring requirements for the 2007 monitoring event. Additional monitoring events will be addressed under separate authorization. Deliverables/Reporting Requirements All data deliverables shall be provided within 60 days after completion of the survey. Data deliverables include all digital video transects on compact disk, frame-grabbed images from all transects on compact disk, PointCount files and associated data (i.e. PTS files, MGR files, cd .dat files) , Excel spreadsheets of Point Count data (raw data and summary files) , and Excel spreadsheets of in-situ quadrat data . The monitoring reports, with appropriate graphics/tables, statistical analysis of the collected data and assessment of project-related impacts to the hardbottom communities, shall be provided within 90 days after completion of the survey. Reports shall be provided in both hard copy and digital format. Notification Requirements: Adverse weather conditions and Implementation of the Contingency Monitoring Plan During the course of each survey, the Consultant shall submit weekly progress reports via email to the County Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems. The weekly progress reports shall consist of a brief narrative describing the progress of work during the week and predicted schedule for the following week. If adverse weather conditions are encountered which do not allow for field operations, the biological consultant shall maintain a log of all attempts to conduct the survey and weather/visibility conditions which prevented collection of the required data. If the biological monitoring team encounters poor visibility conditions that prevent collection of data while they are in the field , conditions shall be documented with digital video at the site. C: Ooeunente end SmngsyomImngV_a 8e ngs\Temporary Intemat ReSIOLK2EV02 sow FINAL dao 4 After demonstration of diligence and repeated failed attempts by the consultant to collect the monitoring data according to the permitted protocol, if the required monitoring is less than 50% complete by August 15th due to the persistently adverse visibility conditions, the County and the Consultant shall coordinate with Department staff to schedule a Department site visit during the second half of August. The consultant shall continue to monitor weather conditions and attempt to collect the required data until the Department site visit. After the site visit, Department staff may make recommendations/revisions to the monitoring protocol to expedite the collection of the data . After coordination and approval by Department staff, if the required monitoring is less than 50% complete by August 31ot, the County shall implement the approved contingency monitoring plan . Task 2 - Post-Construction Turtle Nesting Monitoring ( May 1 , 2007 to October 31 , 2007) Sea turtle permit-compliance monitoring following construction of Indian River County's Beach Nourishment Project for Sectors 1 and 2 at Ambersand Beach is required by DEP Permit Number 0166929-001 -JC Special Condition 130), and additionally by the Biological Monitoring Plan. Ecological Associates, Inc. (EAI) shall perform the efforts described in this task under subcontract with ATM . The post-construction sea turtle protection program shall be implemented as noted herein: 1 ) Project Boundaries. The designed project area is approximately 2.5 miles in length , extending from DEP monument R-3 .5 to R- 12 . 2) Monitoring Period. Monitoring activities will commence on May 1 , 2007 and continue through approximately October 31 , 2007 , as stipulated below. 3) Daily Morning Surveys. Daily early morning (shortly after sunrise) sea turtle nesting surveys will commence on May 1 , 2007 and continue uninterrupted through September 15, 2007. Thereafter, monitoring will be conducted several days each week until the last marked nest has hatched . Surveys will be conducted using ATVs. All emergences (turtle crawls) apparent from the previous night will be interpreted to determine which species of turtle came ashore and whether or not it nested. Crawls will be denoted as being either above or below the previous high tide line . Only those crawls above the tide line will be included in data summaries and analyses. Nests and false crawls will be recorded by pre-established survey zones. These zones will be consistent with those established in the Biological Monitoring Plan for the project. Each false crawl will be categorized as to the stage at which the nesting attempt was abandoned in conformance with Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) requirements for beach restoration projects. Additionally, all obstacles (e.g . , scarps, seawalls, etc. ) encountered by turtles during their emergences onto the beach will be documented . The location of each nest will be recorded using a hand-held GPS unit capable of determining positions to with 10- 16 feet (3-5 meters) of the actual geographic location. This data will be incorporated into EAI's GIS database and nest distribution maps C:1Dpcim v Seflirgs4orieflreepLLo [ SettirpslTe porWy Meurer FIIesOMEW bow FWALtl 5 produced for inclusion in a year-end summary report. 4) Nest Marking. At least 75 loggerhead nests will be marked for the purpose of determining nest fate and reproductive success. The clutch of each marked nest will be located and surrounded by a series of small stakes connected by brightly colored surveyor's tape. Marked nests will be monitored throughout their incubation period to determine nest fate (e. g. , hatched , washed out, depredated , vandalized, etc. ) . After an appropriate incubation period, and in accordance with FWC guidelines, nests will be excavated to determine reproductive success. Nest contents will be assigned to standard categories (e.g . , unhatched eggs, dead hatchlings, etc. ) developed by FWC . Two measures of reproductive success will then be calculated : hatching success (the percentage of eggs in the nest that hatch) and emerging success (the percentage of eggs in the nest that produce hatchlings which successfully escape from the nest) . 5) Scarp Monitoring. Once each week between May 1 and September 15, 2007, the beach will be monitored for the presence of escarpments (scarps). In accordance with FWC protocol , scarps will be functionally defined as an abrupt change in beach slope (greater than 450) that is at least 18 inches in height, and persists for a distance of 100 feet or more. Each scarp observed during the survey will be assigned to one of three categories (0 to 2 feet, 2 to 4 feet, and 4 feet or higher) . Additionally, the location of both the northern and southern terminus of each scarp will be noted relative to the nearest DEP reference monument. This information will be used to calculate the percentage of the total project area affected by scarps. 6) Data management, All data collected during the project will be incorporated into an Access database maintained by EAI. Appropriate QA measures will be implemented to ensure that data are completely and accurately transferred from field data sheet to the electronic database. 7) Reporting. Records of daily monitoring activities, including names of monitoring personnel and times of monitoring will be maintained for the duration of monitoring. Reporting of Scarps - In accordance with FWC permit requirements, EAI will report immediately to ATM and County if any scarp formations are observed , so FWC can be notified . Monthly Data Summaries - Each month , EAI will submit a summary report that will include the following information : A log of monitoring activities; Number of nests and false crawls by species and survey zone; Number of nests marked for reproductive success; Fate of marked nests; and Results of scarp monitoring . Year-end Report - Within 60 days of completion of all monitoring activities, or as otherwise agreed upon, EAI will submit a final report of findings along with a brief interpretive report assessing project affects on nesting and reproductive success. A map depicting nest and scarp locations relative to DEP monuments will be appended to the report. The fate and reproductive success of all marked nests will be C0ents and SWingsyonaR ,anal Saftwgffemporery briemal FIIBsl0LK2EUo2 sow FIKAL.doc 6 tabulated , and an estimate of total hatchling production for the built project will be calculated . To the extent possible, EAI will compare nesting and reproductive success data for the nourished beach with data collected by other permit holders on adjacent beaches. The year-end report will be provided to ATM and the County in both hard copy and electronic format (PDF) and will be accompanied by an electronic spreadsheet containing all raw data for transmittal to FWC. All activities described above will be performed under FWC Marine Turtle Permit TP-010 in accordance with current or future superseding conditions and guidelines issued by the permitting agency. The monitoring program described herein will comply with all conditions related to sea turtle compliance monitoring contained in the regulatory permit(s) issued for the beach nourishment project, for the 2007 marine turtle nesting season only. It is noted that the DEP permit requires monitoring for two additional years. Indian River County is developing a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for sea turtles that will include much of the survey effort that is required by the beach restoration permit, and it is assumed that once the HCP is initiated , these efforts can be combined. For this reason , this scope includes only the first year of turtle nesting monitoring required by the permit. Task 3 = Nearshore Turtle Monitoring ( Fall 2006 to Spring 2009 ) The Biological Monitoring Plan for the Indian River County Sectors 1 &2 beach restoration project contains an element for assessing sea turtle population levels in the nearshore area throughout the County. This assessment is to be conducted semi- annually pre-construction 2006 , and continuing for three successive years thereafter. In- Water Research Group (IRG) will complete the field and statistical efforts described in this task under subcontract with ATM. The data is to be used to determine seasonal differences in sea turtle abundance in the nearshore environment, as well as differences in sea turtle abundance at differing distances offshore and at different locations within the County. To provide for sufficient data for analysis, two complete surveys, as described below, will be needed each sampling period . The complete project will require seven sampling periods, with two sampling events per period , for a total of 14 countywide sea turtle surveys. Task 3.1 Field Surveys: Surveys will be conducted along a series of 3-kilometer long transects previously established by Indian River County. Study sites and survey methodology will be in accordance with the Indian River County Sectors 1 &2 Beach Restoration Project Biological Monitoring Plan prepared by Applied Technology and Management (ATM) and Indian River County . Task 3.2 Data Analysis: Data will be tabulated and transmitted to ATM and Indian River County (IRC) at the conclusion of each survey effort. At the conclusion of the study, ANOVA or other appropriate statistical treatments will be employed to statistically compare turtle CiDooumsms a SeWrasyomfluM% .ocsl Settings\Temporary Menet Fil"1OLK2Eho2 sow FMALA 7 abundances between seasons, sites, and distances offshore. For seasonal comparisons, data from the north, south and central survey zones will be pooled . To analyze differences between the survey zones, data from all observations will be pooled . To analyze differences in turtle abundance at different distances offshore, the sub- contractor (IRG) will pool data from all survey zones and periods. Task 3.3 Report Preparation : Annual summary reports and a final report at the conclusion of the project completely describing the methods, results and conclusions of the survey project shall be provided . Additionally, a summary report of the 2001 nearshore turtle transect work to serve as a pre-construction baseline for the proposed monitoring shall be provided. All reporting and transmittal efforts shall be conducted by IRG and Indian River County. ATM staff shall have no role in review and comment on draft reports, nor in the submittal of said documents to regulatory agencies. It is assumed that the first surveys will be conducted in the spring quarter (April-June) 2007. Following the initial surveys, surveys will then be conducted in: Fall 2006 (August- September) , Spring 2007 (April-June), Fall 2007 (August-September) , Spring 2008 (April-June) , Fall 2008 (August-September), and Spring 2009 (April-June). Task 4 - Juvenile Green Turtle Netting Studies Per the February 2003 amendment to the Indian River County Sectors 1 &2 Beach Restoration Project Biological Monitoring Plan , netting studies shall be utilized to directly assess the potential effects of beach restoration activities on turtles in nearshore reef foraging habitats. Data that has been collected by turtle researchers at the University of Central Florida (UCF) shall be utilized for this purpose. UCF researchers have been conducting netting for over a decade in the nearshore directly offshore from the proposed Sector 1 and 2 project area. The extensive Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) data they have collected since 1989 can serve as a baseline from which project effects can be assessed . UCF staff will conduct the nearshore reef netting effort in the summer 2006 (pre- construction) and following construction and in two subsequent summers (2007 & 2008) including data analysis and report preparation on the effects of the project on foraging marine turtle CPUE. Task 5 - Post Construction Beach Tilling ( First Year Post Construction) As required by permit, tilling of the project is required prior to turtle nesting season for two years following project construction. Tilling is required to mitigate for beach compaction related to project construction. Under this task tilling of the project area as CMo entn aM Setli,xpywaNenpLLocal SeeinycRempmery Memel RwOLK2E1 cow FINAL.tl 8 delineated within the project permit will be conducted for the year following project construction (2007) . C:OW=e ft an SWtngsyonffflum%o I SaU ftsUempmry k le FiWOLK2Et02 sow FINALAoc 9 EXHIBIT `B ' COST PROPOSAL FAPUBLIC WORKSVONG\1&2 RENOURISHMENT\ATM WORK ODER #2.DOC Indian River County Beach Restoration Project - ATM Conwad AmaMn_m at Ambersand Segment Biological Monitoring and Tilling Subeontraotor H - Subcorroa r N - Suboorrtnetors3 . 9ubeontnelor N • University of Conllnenlal SheN Subcontractor H . Ecological Inwalar Ross Subeontnolor b6 • Centnl Floods Total Subs. Management Total Task Task TASK DESCRIPTION AND BREAKDOWN Assoc. Coastal EcoCnu Aesxlates Ino. Onu Ino. Beach Tillln TBD UCF) Subocrdraelor & Adnin ATM Budget 1 Slele Ical Monitoring on Neanhon 1.1 FISItl/OE1]3184.00 1"319400 17319A0 190513A0 1.2 OAC and antlA en Coordination 55U0 18550W 135500 3 2040500 Task i TOTAL c ST 181 7=6 18171.10 210 813.10 2 Post-Consbuelion Tulle Nestina Meniterin 61011t)7 to 143110 2.1 Su MOMon2475.00 A 2,47500 S 247.50 a 27 50 2.2 Dai Nene Surve U819.00 I a 41,013.90 $ 4151.30 a 45771.30 23 1 N"t MMM ant Montionm 25 2/ D Meru nom - Mo Re 539].25 4331. S /3 .i 178/.33 5,387,26 538.73 5,m," 25 Year ni Row" 843 .00 8 35.00 81350 078.50 Task 2 TOTAL COST N 211.60 024.16 N 28&N 3 Neanhers Tunis Monitodn Fall 2003 - 5 do 06 M .1 Fietl Surves 12.w N 1 0000 126000 13880.00 32 Dela AN is 800. 80000 80.00 00 33 Re RPro nlion Task 3 TOTAL COST 230000 S 2300.00 30. 2530.Op 15 700.00 1 670.00 1 1 17 270.00 1 1 Juvenile Oresn Turtle Natting Studies inctne Umms300 .00 3000000 3000.00 33000.00 TaskITOTAL COST 30 DD0.00 3000.00 39000.N 6 Beseh Tlllin Ti 10 00 10000.00 1000.00 1100000 Taak6TOTAL COST 1000000 10NN 11000N Pro ect Totals • Subs, ATM Labor ATM ODC's and Overall 307 685.50 $ 30 768.55 $ 338 454.05 roaxa7,moa