HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-323 A
Indian River County
2020 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 6
' Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County Community Development Department
Adopted : , 2006
Supplement _ (Entire Element) ; Ordinance 2006-
Exhibit A
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table of Contents
List of Figures iii
List of Tables iv
Introduction I
Existing Conditions 2
Financial Resources 2
Expenditures 19
Existing Outstanding Debt 22
Local Policies and Practices 23
Analysis 26
Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements 27
Needs Assessment 28
Fiscal Assessment 30
Fiscal Assessment Summary 40
Concurrency Management Plan 40
Project Applicability 41
Service Standards 41
Demand 42
Availability of Capacity 44
Regulation 47
Monitoring System 47
Applicability 49
Goal, Objectives, and Policies 50
Implementation , Evaluation, and Monitoring 58
Implementation 58
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures 60
Appendix A : SevenFive-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements 63
Appendix B : Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program -7481
Appendix C : Long Range Transportation Plan 2825 2030 Roadway Improvement Plan
7582
Community Development Department Indian River County ii
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
List of Figures
Figure Title pane
6. 1 Ad Valorem Tax Revenue 3
6 .2 Enterprise Fund Revenue 3
6 . 3 User Fees and Charges 4
6. 4 Special Assessment Revenue 5
6. 5 Impact Fee Revenue 5
6 . 6 Local Discretionary Sales Surtax 6
6 . 7 Tourist Development Tax 7
6 . 8 Local Option Fuel Tax 9
6. 9 Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue 10
6 . 10 Half-Cent Local Government Sales Tax 13
6 . 11 County Revenue Sharing 14
6 . 12 Constitutional Fuel Tax Funds 14
6 . 13 County Fuel Tax 15
6. 14 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax 16
6 . 15 Mobile Home License Tax 17
6. 16 Distribution of Revenue by Category 18
6 . 17 General Expenditures by Function 21
6 . 18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures 30
Community Development Department Indian River County iii
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
List of Tables
Table Title page
6 . 1 Indian River County Sources of Funds (FY 004/0470
2
6 .2 Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities 8
6 . 3 Local Fuel Tax Rates 10
6.4 Indian River General Revenues by Source 18
6 . 5 Indian River County Expenditures by Function 19
6 .6 Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt 23
6 .7 Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River 29
County
6 . 8 Overall General Revenue Projection Summary 31
6. 9 Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element 32
6 . 10 Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections 32
6 . 11 Indian River County General Expenditures Projection Summary 33
6. 12 Projected Expenditures for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste 34
6 . 13 Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections 34
6. 14 Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without 35
Public Vote
6 . 15 Indian River County Bond Schedule 36
6 . 16 Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities 41
6. 17 Monitoring System Design 48
6 . 18 Monitoring System Tasks 494-9
6. 19 Capital Improvements Element Implementation Matrix 59
6 .20 Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix 61
Community Development Department Indian River County iv
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Introduction
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the
other comprehensive plan elements and describes the financial means by which these facilities are to
be funded. This element demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and
prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements
based on the level of needs and the availability of funds.
For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major
equipment) that costs at least $25 , 000 and which is required to maintain adopted level-of-service
standards or to meet objectives identified in the county ' s comprehensive plan .
Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency
management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section.
Financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions
section. The fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues
concerning capital improvement projects , are assessed in the analysis section of this element. The
administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed in the
concurrency management section, while the county ' s overall capital improvements strategy is
discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a -75 -Year Schedule of Capital
Improvements , as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation
section of this element.
Community Development Department Indian River County
1
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Existing Conditions
Financial Resources
One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of
revenue available to the county. These revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund
needed capital improvements . Table 6 . 1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources
and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2004/05 . Table 6. 1 also
shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the
revenue sources .
Table 6 . 1 : Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2004/05)
Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources
Amount °f Amount /o of Amount � of
($ 1 ,000) T0at Total Total
Revenue (51,000) Rev n ($ 1,000)
Revenue Revenue
Various $ 19,633 7. 75% Local Government $8747 3 .45% Ad Valorem Taxes $74, 179 29.25%
Grants Half-Cent Sales Tax
Total p
$ 19,663 7.75% County Revenue
Federal Sharing $2,835 1 . 12% Enterprise Funds $50,238 19.81
Constitutional Fuel $ 1763 0. 70% User Fees and 716%
Tax Charges $ 18, 152
County Fuel Tax $779 0.31 % Special $392 0.15%
Assessments
Alcoholic Beverage $51 0.02% Impact Fees $36,297 1431 %
License Tax
Pari-Mutuel Tax $447 0. 18% Local Discretionary $ 15,583 6. 14%
Sales Surtax
Mobile Home $ 101 004% Tourist $ 1676 0.66%
License Tax Development Tax
Various Grants $5,731 2.26% Local Option Fuel $3,367 1 .33%
Tax
Total State $20,454 8.06% Franchise Tau $7.941 3. 13%
Interest Income $4,083 1 .61 %
Other $ 1 ,592 0d6l
Total Local $213,500 :84Total All Sources $253,617
Source: Indian River County Finance Department.
Communitv Development Department Indian River County
2
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Local Sources
Local sources consist of revenue sources that -
are levied, collected and disbursed at the Figure 6 . 1 : Ad Valorem Tax Revenue
local level solely at the discretion of Indian
River County. These
ces
hlocal own in able 1 , andaredescribed a
ibedin $�o,000 sss esz 2876 S o p4 6 4 79
further detail below. $60,000
$52 ,308
$49,045
• Ad Valorem Taxes (Property $50,000 -
Taxes) $40,000 - -
$30,000 - -
Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the I $20,000 -
assessed value (net of any exemptions) of
real or personal property. This tax is $10,000 - - -
commonly referred to as "property tax. " Ad $o
valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; 1 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed
value. The state mandated millage cap is 10 i_ ® Revenue (in thousands) J
mills per local government, excluding voted Source: Indian River County Finance Department
millages. In FY 20034_/045 , Indian River ir - - - -
County applied an aggregate millage rate of Figure 6. 2: Enterprise Fund Reserve
6:.53366 . 0885 . The Board of County
Commissioners' policies allow revenue from ''i $60,000 --- -----
ad valorem taxes to be used for both $SO z38
operating and capital project expenditures. $50, 000 - -
$40,447
Table 6 . 1 shows that, in FY 20034/045 $40,000 - ss4w s347s7 $36P943 -
63,,72,
Indian River County collected approximately $30,000 -
$704. 1 -3479 , 000 in ad valorem taxes. Ad i
valorem taxes represented 34 . 8229 .25 % of $20,000 -
all revenues collected by Indian River
—
County in FY 2003 $10, 0004/045 . --
Figure 6 . 1 displays the ad valorem tax $o
revenue collected 2000 tool 2002 2003 2004 zoos
b Indian R' �
y
River County
over the last six fiscal years . Over that time
period , ad valorem tax revenue increased ® Revenue (in thousands)
55 . 4551 ,25%. Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Community Development Department Indian River County
3
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Enterprise Funds
Within governmental entities, various departments often exist that provide goods and services to the
public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments , classed under the general title
"enterprise funds," must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Enterprise departments
assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian River
County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, Shooting Range, and
Building Division are enterprises.
Table 6 . 1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 20 .0819. 81 % of Indian River County ' s
total source of funds for FY 2003-4/045 . Figure 6 .2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by
Indian River County over the last six fiscal years . Over that time period, enterprise fund revenue
increased 34.2558_37% .
• User Fees and Charges
User fees and charges represent revenue Figure 6. 3: User Fees and Charges
received by the county for providing various
general services. User fees and charges are $20, 000 - $ 8, 152
necessary because taxes alone cannot totally $18.000 - -- --
keep
keep up with the increasing costs of $16,000 - - - - $14 ,283services . This category includes fees $14,000 - $13,683
collected by the Tax Collector' s Office, the $12.000 811033 $17,368
Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property $10,000 $9 ,425
Appraiser' s Office, the Sheriff' s $8.000 -
Department, and the Recreation and Parks $6, 000
Department. This category also includes $4, 000 - - —
other miscellaneous user fees charged by the $2,000
county for general services not financed by $-
other fund sources . In FY 20034/045 user 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
fees and charges represented 7.9916% of all
funds collected by Indian River County. ® Revenue (in thousands )
Figure 6 .3 displays User fees and charges Source: Indian River County Finance Department
collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Over that time period, revenue from
user fees and charges has varied, but overall, increased 44 .3592. 59% .
Community Development Department Indian River County
4
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Special Assessments
Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue
Special assessments are compulsory payments g p
levied on real property for specific benefits
actualthe scostseofltheeimp osvementsreflCounty $450 $345 - $335 $345 53ez
generated by public investments or services
nt
t fairly
ect the
$400
$350 -
revenues which fall under the general category $300 - $279
of special assessments consist of street paving $250
assessments, street lighting district $200 $187
assessments, as well as assessments for water, $ 150 -
sewer, and drainage improvements. $100 -
Expenditures of special assessment revenue $50
are restricted to public improvement projects $_
that directly benefit the property owner or 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
payee . For example, street paving assessment
revenues must be spent on paving streets that
directly benefit the payer of the assessment. ® Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Special Assessment funds represented r - --
0 . 1 -75% of
-0 . 1 -75% of county funds for FY 20043/045 as I Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue
shown in table 6. 1 . Figure 6.4 displays the
revenue collected by Indian River County $40,000 S36,zs7
through special assessments over the last six $35
,000
fiscal years.
$30, 000
• Impact Fees $25,000 - - - --
$20.000 -- - - -
An impact fee is any charge, fee, or $1s,000
assessment levied as a condition of issuance $10.410
of subdivision or site plan approval, issuance $10,000 -- - - -
of a building permit, approval of a certificate $5, 000 S3 ,973 $4'597
of occupancy, or other development or $
construction approval when any portion of 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
the revenues collected is intended to fund any
portion of the costs of capital improvements ® Revenue ( in thousands )
for any public facilities . --
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Prior to October , nooSince 1986, Indian River County has levied traffi , �. atc--oa r—,;ev er impact
fees on new development projects. in Oetabe- t 999, k ,.ater and seNver impaet fees were restruetured
Community Development Department Indian River County
5
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
In June of2005 , Indian River County bean to levy 8 new impact fees At the
same time, the Countv increased the existing traffic impact fee rates The current impact fees
include : traffic, emergency services parrs and recreation public schools solid waste correctional
facilities. law enforcement libraries and public buildings
Table 6. 1 shows that-the substantial increase in impact fee revenues related to the addition of the
eight new impact fees and the increase in traffic impact fee rates hi FY 2003 /04 traffic impact fees
represented 5 . 17% of funds collected by Indian River County e- F 04._ In contrast, traffic
impact fees and the eight additional impact fees represented 14 . 31 % of funds collected by Indian
River. County for FY 2004/05 . l igere 6 . 5 displays the Y o u a , ,atria Rivef
Gounty over the laA six fiscal years . Startingwith FY 199942000, fevenue is for traffic impae! fiees
only. This eliange
• Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
Local governments are authorized to levy numerous types of local discretionary sales surtaxes
pursuant to s . 212 . 055 , F. S . Under the provisions of s . 212 . 054, F . S . , the local discretionary sales
surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, use, services, rentals,
admissions , and other authorized _ - - - -
transactions. The surtax is computed by I Figure 6.6 : Local Discretionary Sales
multiplying the rate imposed by the county Surtax
where the sale occurs by the amount of the
taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on $16, 000 -- -- --
most transactions under $5000. $16,000 - $15,M3
$14,000
Under this category, Indian River County is $12,000
$Y1,546
eligible to impose a Local Government $10,000
Infrastructure Surtax of either 0 . 5% or 1 . 0% $8, 000 -
and a School Capital Outlay Surtax of up to $6, 000 -
0 . 5%. Currently, Indian River County $4,000
imposes only the 1 . 0% Infrastructure Surtax. $2 ,000
The Local Government Infrastructure Surtax 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
must be enacted by a majority vote of the
Board of County Commissioners and ® Revenue (in thousands )
approved by voters in a countywide -- -- - - -
Source Indian River County Finance Department
referendum. This surtax, which may be
imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was initiated by Indian River County in April, 1989,
and was renewed by voters in November, 2002 . Generally, the proceeds must be expended to
finance, plan, and construct infrastructure ; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or
protection of natural resources; and to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste
Community Development Department Indian River County
6
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental
Protection.
Table 6. 1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 6.386. 14% of all funds collected by
Indian River County in FY 20043/045 . Figure 6 . 6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years . This local revenue source
increased by 394747_76% over that period.
Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a
formula based on population. Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue from Indian River County is
distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on
population.
Twenty-four of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax .
Within Indian River County' s region, Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie counties do not levy the
surtax, while Martin County has levied the infrastructure surtax . Okeechobee County is eligible to
levy the infrastructure surtax, but instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1 %, which is another local
discretionary sales surtax .
• Tourist Development Tax
Any county in the state may, subject to a Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax
vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Revenue
Development Tax . The transient rental I
trade is the primary base for the levy of the 1 $1 , 800 ------ _ $1676
tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six $1 ,600 - - -
$1408 $1,4V
months or less is subject to the tax . $1 ,400 $1287
$1 ,200 s1. 1w — —_ — $1082 -
The tourist tax levy is generally one or two $1 ,000 --
percent. Counties may set an additional $800 -one percent above the original tax through $600
an extraordinary vote of the governing 111 $400 -
board or by referendum. Currently, Indian $200
River County imposes the original two $_
percent tourist tax as well as an additional 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 I
one percent tax. Fifty-threeseven Florida D Revenue (in thousands)
counties out of sixty-seven total counties
currently levy a tourist tax. Of those fifty- Source: Indian River County Finance Department
threeseven counties, thirty-three—five
counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax.
Community Development Department Indian River County
7
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian
River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of
tourist taxes . Brevard, Indian River, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie Counties have the highest tourist tax
levy of the six counties listed . Martin County has the lowest tourist tax levy.
Table 6.2: Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities
Professional Additional
Original Additional Sports Professional Maximum Total %
County Tourist Tax Franchise Sports Potential % Levy
Tax Facility Tax Franchise Levy
Tax
Brevard 2 .00% 1 .00% 1 .00% ---------- 5 .00% 4 .00%
Indian River 2. 00% 1 .00% 1 .00% ---------- 5 . 00% 4.00%
Martin 2.00% --------- ---------- ---------- 3 .00% 2.00%
Okeechobee 2 .00% 1 .00% ---------- ---------- 4.00% 3 .00%
Palm Beach 2 . 00% 1 .00% 1 .00% ---------- 5 .00% 4. 00%
St. Lucie 2 .00% 1 .00% 1 . 00% 1 .00% 5 . 00% 5 .00%
✓ - indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax
Source : Local Government Financial Information Handbook, April 2004.
The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes :
( 1 ) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated
convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the
district that the tax is imposed;
(2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida;
(3 ) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by
contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county;
(4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and
restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access;
(5) Construct, improve, maintain, and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers
which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization
which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less
than 500,000) ;
Community Development Department Indian River County
8
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
(6) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county,
subject to certain limitations.
Figure 6. 7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the
last six fiscal years . Over that time period, tourist tax revenue received by Indian River County
fluctuated based on market conditions, but had an overall increase of 24750.45%.
• Local Option Fuel Tax
Figure 6. 8: Local Option Fuel Tax
Local governments are authorized to levy Revenue
up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes
in the form of three separate levies . These $4,000 $3,609
levies are : $3, 500 _ _ _ _ $3,924 $3.367
➢ a one to six cent local $3.059
option fuel tax ;
000 $2,862 E2,906
➢ a one to five cent local $2,500 -
option fuel tax; and $2,000 —
➢ a ninth cent fuel tax . $1 , 500 -
Indian River County currently imposes the ! $1 , 000
$500
full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax.
This tax applies to every net gallon of $_
motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
The one to six cent fuel tax may be ® Revenue (in thousands)
authorized by an ordinance adopted by a
majority vote of the governing body or Source: Indian River County Finance Department
voter approval in a county-wide
referendum . Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures .
Table 6. 1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 4-. 6-5l . ' 3 % of all funds collected by
Indian River County for FY 20034/045 . Figure 6 . 8 shows that local option fuel tax revenue for the
county has increased overall by 44 . 5917_65 % over the last six fiscal years, with a significant increase
occurring in FY 2001 /2002 , and then a moderation in FY 2002/2003 . That large increase in FY
2001 /2002 shown in Figure 6. 8 can be attributed to a delay in the county distributing funds to the
municipalities. Because of a dispute over allocations, money from the prior fiscal year was held until
the dispute was resolved.
All sixty- seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. Sixty-fie five
counties levy the full $0 . 06, while the remaining tlireetvo counties levy a portion of the tax .
Community Development Department Indian River County
9
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6 .3 shows the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the
region. Saint Lucie, Martin, and Palm Beach counties levy the highest fuel taxes at $ 0. 12 per gallon.
Those three counties along with Okeechobee County impose the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax. Indian River
County is eligible to levy the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of
County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy
the tax . Forty-twethree of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax.
Table 6.3 : Local Fuel Tax Rates
County One to Six Cent One to Five Cent Ninth Cent Fuel Total Local Fuel
Local Option Local Option Fuel
Fuel Tax Tax Tax Tax
Brevard $0. 06 -------- -------- $0. 06
Indian River $0 .06 -------- -------- $0.06
Martin $0. 06 $0. 05 $0 . 01 $0 . 12
Okeechobee $0. 06 -------- $0. 01 $0. 07
Palm Beach $0. 06 $0. 05 $0. 01 $0. 12
St. Lucie $0 .06 $0 . 05 $0. 01 $0. 12
Source : Local Government Financial Information Handbook, April 2004.
As shown in table 6 . 3 , three counties in the Figure 6 .9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue
region, Martin County, Palm Beach County, 11
and St. Lucie County, levy a portion of the $9,000
One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel tax . This $8,000
second local option fuel tax is a one to five $7, 000 L ss , eo
cent levy upon every net gallon of motor fuel $5,65 $6.2W u,� ss,22z
$6,000
sold in a county. Indian River County can $e ,000 �-
levy this second tax through an ordinance
adopted by a majority plus one vote of the $4 ,000 —
Board of County Commissioners or by voter $3,000
approval in a countywide referendum, but does $2,000 t
not concurrently levy the tax. Sixteen of the $i ,000 -
sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a $_ _
portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Fuel Tax .
® Revenue (in thousands )
•
Franchise Fee/Tax Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Community Development Department Indian River County
10
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for
the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government' s rights-of-way to
conduct the utility ' s business . Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement
negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives
franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises.
Table 6 . 1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 3-343 . 13 % of all funds collected by Indian
River County in FY 20034/045 . Figure 6 .9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee
revenue collected by Indian River County increased 21 .2141 .42% .
• Other Miscellaneous Revenue
Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income,
rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for
Indian River County represented 3$20 . 63 % of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY
20034/045 .
• Borrowing
The county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond
the realm of current cash reserves, operating revenue and reasonable taxation. Borrowing money to
pay for capital improvements can be done through either short-term or long-term financing. Short
term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with
banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually
achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market.
The county may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge
used for the bond is a non-ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad
valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum.
General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the county . These
bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer' s ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the
amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not
subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits . Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and
require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance .
Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of
the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified
sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for
payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects,
Community Development Department Indian River County
11
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
grants and excise, or other specified non-ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior
to issuance or validation of such obligations .
The county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water,
and golf course facilities. Revenue bonds have been issued by the Housing Authority to help finance
the provision of more low-income housing units in the county . Also, revenue bonds have been issued
to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects . Deposits from bond
revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for these projects, whereby funds are
specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt.
Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas
or groups of property owners . Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property
owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of these bonds does not need to be approved
by voter referendum .
Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment
bond debt is paid-off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing
user charges . The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal.
The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than
five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter
maturity dates than bonds . Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover
gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in
anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond
issues . The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes .
• Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources
Use of additional revenue sources may occasionally be necessary, depending on priorities mandated
by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources . IndianRiver
County has two options to increase local revenues. These are to implement new taxes that are
permitted by state regulation and/or to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county.
Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax,
the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax.
Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the
purchase of fuel . With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special
fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county . Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be
shared with municipalities, but counties are not required bylaw to share the proceeds. Authorized
uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of
establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional uses
include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads.
Community Development Department Indian River County
12
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every
gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from this fuel tax must be shared among
all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical
transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five
Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital
Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan .
A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to I % on any lodging agreement for six
months or less, within Indian River County. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt
service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional
sports franchise facility.
State Sources
Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to
the county. For example, state sources may originate from state general revenues and be shared by the
state according to state revenue allocation formulas. Table 6. 1 displays the state revenue sources
applicable to Indian River County. These sources are described in further detail below.
• Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax
The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax
Program allocates 8 . 814% of net sales tax j Figure 6. 10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue
proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a
county to a special account administered by $10,000
$9,000 $8,747
the Department of Revenue ; this account is -
the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax $8,000 $7.002
Clearing Trust Fund. These funds are then $7,000 $6,20$
asszt assn _
earmarked for distribution to the governing $6,000
body of the county and each municipality $5, 000 -
within the county. Distribution of these $4' 000
monies within the county is determined by a j $3,000
formula that uses a weighting factor based $2,000
on the population of the incorporated and $1 ,000
unincorporated areas and multiplies this
factor by 8 . 814% of the sales tax proceeds 2000 2001 2002 2003 zooa 2005
received for the county. In FY 20034/045 , ® Revenue (in thousands)
Indian River County received
$7 , 564 ,0008 , 747,00 through the hall-cent Source: Indian River County Finance Department
sales tax. As shown in table 6. 1 , that amount
represented 3.76') . 45 % of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 20034/045 fiscal year.
Community Development Department Indian River County
13
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6. 10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half-cent local
government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Over those six fiscal years, Indian River County' s
half-cent sales tax revenue increased -28 . 8140 . 97% .
Occasionally, governments can receive --
supplemental distributions by meeting special Figure 6. 11 : County Revenue Sharing
eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the
total supplemental and ordinary distribution I $3,500 —
exceed the maximum per capita amount
$3.000 62 ,756 �.asa s2 ,635
allowed by law. Governments are allowed -
wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax . $2, 500 $2 .366 $2,370 62 ,4$2 j
For counties, the law provides only that half $2000
cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide
tax relief or countywide programs . $1 ,500 -
$1 , 000 -
• County Revenue Sharing
$500 - -
The current structure of the county revenue s-
sharing program consists of two revenue 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
sources. These sources include 2 . 90% of net IM Revenue (in thousands)
cigarette tax collections and 2 .25 % of sales
and use tax collections . Proceeds are collected
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
by the state and then distributed to eligible
counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue;
however, there are some statutory
limitations regarding these funds being FIGURE 6. 12: Constitutional Fuel Tax
used as a pledge for indebtedness . Revenue
To receive distribution proceeds through
the county revenue sharing program, $21
000
counties must meet the following criteria : $ $so ,
$1,664 $1,763
$1 ,500 -
( 1 ) That law enforcement officers and
firefighters are certified and meet $1 , 000 - -
state requirements;
$500 - -- - - -
(2) That certification of taxable value
for a property tax levy is made in a 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
timely and correct manner to the
® Revenue (in thousands)
Department of Revenue ;
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Community Development Department Indian River County
14
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
(3) That the county' s most recent financial reports have been sent to the Department of Banking
and Finance, and post audits of these statements and accounts have been provided.
Table 6 . 1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 4-.441 . 12% of all funds collected by
Indian River County in FY 20034/045 . Figure 6. 11 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county
revenue sharing proceeds received by Indian River County varied over time, but overall decreaseR
increased by 67342 . 87% .
• Constitutional Fuel Tax
Constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon imposed upon the
first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida) of motor fuel. Revenues from
this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler.
In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state-shared revenue source for counties only.
Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to
comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax
anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds . After complying
with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county' s surplus funds to its
governing body.
Table 6 . 1 shows that revenue received from
the constitutional fuel tax levy represented Figure 6. 13: County Fuel Tax
:840 .70% of total revenue received by Indian
River County in FY 20034/045 . Figure 6 . 12 $soo
shows that, over the last six fiscal years, sn9
constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Ili $aoo ssae $663 $66' _ �92 _
Indian River County increased 4-8-:8621 .42%.
$soo
• County Fuel Tax $500
$400
The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at $300
the rate of one cent per net gallon. The $200 - -
legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a $loo
county' s reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds $_ -
received from this tax can be used by a 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
county for transportation-related expenses,
including the reduction of bond indebtedness ® Revenue (in thousands)
incurred for transportation purposes. - — -
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Community Development Department Indian River County
15
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6 . 1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0:37031 % of all
revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 20034/045 . Figure 6. 13 shows that, over the last six
fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 4q-.4120 . 22%.
• Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales
agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and
distributed to local governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the
Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within
a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division
and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation.
Table 6 . 1 shows that the county received approximately $ 501 ,000 from this tax in FY 20034/045
0 .02% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6. 14 shows that, over the last six fiscal
years , alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated, but overall
remained about the same .
• Pari- Mutuel Tax
Revenue generated through license fees and Figure 6 .14 : Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
taxes related to Pari -Mutuel betting is
deposited into the Pari-Mutuel wagering ! $54
trust fund. According to Florida Statutes, a $52
guaranteed entitlement of $29,915 ,500 is $50
deducted from the trust fund for equal s4e
distributions among Florida' s sixty-seven $48
counties, providing each county ' s general $46 -
revenue fund with $446, 500. Table 6 . 1 544V4
$aa
shows that revenue received from the Pari- i
Mutuel tax represented 020. 18% of $42 —
revenues received by Indian River County in i $40
FY 20032004/045 . Uses for this revenue are 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
determined by the Board of County
Commissioners . ® Revenue (in thousands )
Mobile Home License Tax Source: Indian River County Finance Department
•
An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and
fifth-wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length . The license taxes, ranging from $20 to
Community Development Department Indian River County
16
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$ 80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes . The taxes are collected by
the county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles .
From each license, $ 1 . 50 is deducted by the
Department of Highway Safety and Motor I Figure 6.15 : Mobile Home License Tax Revenue
Vehicles. The remaining balance is deposited
into the License Tax Collection Trust Fund for $160 swa
distribution to units of local government. A $140 894 $roo
county government is eligible to receive $120 $12 '
$bs
proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home $1D1$100
units are located in its unincorporated area. An $80 _
authorized use of the proceeds is not specified $so
in the current law. $40 — -
Table 6 . 1 shows that funds received through the $zo
mobile home license tax represented 0 .0704% $
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
of all revenue received by Indian River County
in FY 20932004/045 . Figure 6 . 15 shows that, ® Revenue (in thousands)
over the last six fiscal years, mobile home
license tax revenue received by Indian River source: Indian River County F;na��e oepar[mern
County decreased overall by 4.6724_63 % .
• Various Grants
Table 6 . 1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 2:392 . 26% of funds
received by the county in FY 20034/045 . State grant funds received by the county in FY 20034/045
originated from the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, the Florida Housing Finance
Corporation, the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State of Florida
Department of State Division of Library and Information Services, the State of Florida Department of
State Division of Historic Resources the State of Florida Department of Transportation, the State e
r' " r' a Office f State Gourts ^ drninistmto , the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation
Disadvantaged, the State of Florida Department of Manaeement Services the State of Florida
Department of Revenue the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, the Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Federal Sources
Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for
administration and monitoring. These grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than
by formula allocations , thereby making projections of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of
revenue projections, these sources will be assumed to remain constant.
Community Development Department Indian River County
17
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The county received approximately 59377;090$ 19.663 .000 in federal funds during FY
2993204/045 . These funds represented 47. 75 % of all funds received by Indian River County in
FY 20034/045 .
Overall Revenue Sources
As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the
state Chart of Accounts . These categories include taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental
revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, interest, and miscellaneous revenues . Table 6 .4
identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from these sources for fiscal years
199899/992000 through 20034/045 .
Table 6.4 : Indian River County General Revenues By Source
Fiscal Licenses & Permits lntergovemmental Charges for Fines & !Miscellaneous Totals
Year Taxes Revenue Services Forfeitures Revenues
99/2000 $69,537,158 $520,813 $18,908,166 $9,425,310 $ 1 ,332,950 $ 11,338,449 $ 111 ,062,846
20D0/01 $73,553,625 5493,585 $ 18,764,102 $ 11,037,594 $1,251,098 514,727.979 $ 119,827,983
2001/02 $80,488,343 $515,653 $20,802,982 $ 11 ,368,399 $1 ,421 ,542 $11 ,600,449 $126, 197,368
2002/03 $&6, 120,084 $ ,403 $35,213,140 513,683, 108 $ 1,584,737 $9,703,817 $ 146,872,289
2003/04 595,675,370 $ 1 ,056733,394 $26,588,303 $ 14,282,587 51 ,508.786 $ 14,545,961 $153,634,401
2004/05 $ 104,012,925 51 ,354,282 535,973,818 $ 18,151,546 $ 1 ,715,875 $42, 170,294 $203,378,740
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2005
Figure 6 . 16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6. 4 for each of
the last six fiscal years.
Figure 6 . 16 : Distribution of General Revenues By Category
2000 2007
zooz
62 .61 % 61 . 38% 63.78%
.: 11i i a..., ;..;
- 0.47% - 0.41 %
r
0 9. 19% — 1- 0.41 %
10.21 /° 1 .20% &49% 17.02% 12. 29% 1 .04% 9.21 % 15.66%
1 . 13% = 9.01 % 16.48%
2003 2004
2005
58.64% 0.39% 62.27% 51 . 14% - 0.67%
,.1+ {a�.d' - u..., gill li`"" — . 17.69%
:+ 23.98% 947% .... 0.67% . 92%
6.61 % — 1 .0'1 8% 9.32% 0.98% 17
9.30% 20. 73%
'' .31 % '- 0. 84%
pTaxes ® Licenses & Permits
❑ Intergovernmental Revenue
C] Charges for Services ■ Fines & Forfeitures p Miscellaneous Revenues
Community Development Department Indian River County
18
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Expenditures
In the previous sub-section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian River
County were reviewed. This sub-section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those
monies are allocated to meet the county ' s needs. Table 6 . 5 presents the county ' s overall general
expenditures by category for fiscal years 19999/99200. 0 through 20034/045.
Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function
Fiscal Year 1999/2000 2000/01 2001 /02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
General Government
$ 14,665,306.00 $ 15799,857.00 $20,228,495.00 $23785,570.00 526,47330000 526,797, 18300
Public Safety
$40,893, 105 00 $42,891 , 19400 $45,352,32300 547,565,04800 555,792, 130.00 $57, 161,390.00
Physical Environment
S4,947.965,00 $2,2>4,447 .00 S2,667,619.00 $18,587, 122.00 $3,305,670,00 $4,573, 196 00
Transportation
513415,177.00 $ 13,408,73600 522,729,769.00 $20, 120,969.00 $23,03& 234.00 522,369128.00
Economic Environment
5259,354 .00 $302,580.00 5347,096.00 $583,850 00 $627,914 00 $712,517.00
Human Services
$4928, 117 .00 $5,746,41000 $5832,44100 $6,540,673.00 57,197,342.00 57,279,58200
Culture/Recreation
$12,006,07900 $21,945,498.00 $ 19,323,355.00 $23253,84100 515022,19600 521359,21800
Court Related
$4,565,674.00 S5,323,388,00 $5,802,798.00 $5,998,260.00 $6,210,614.00 S5,630,734.00
Debt Service
56,195,738.00 $1,859,710.00 S3.850,379 00 $4,520,637.00 $3,727534.00 $3495500.00
TOTAL
$ 101 ,876,515.00 $ 109,531 ,82000 $ 126, 134,275.00 S150,955,97000 $141 ,394,934 .00 5749,318,448.00
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2005
Table 6 . 5 shows expenditures in nine categories . Depending on the county ' s activities in any given
fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6 . 17 displays the
percentage distribution of Indian River County ' s general expenditures over the last six fiscal years.
General Government
A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government
expenditure category , includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of
the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County
Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers,
except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6. 5 , $3473,300 26, 7 77 , 183was spent on general government
services in FY 20034/045. Between fiscal years 20023 /034 and 20034/045 general government
expenditures increased by 44,3122 %. General government services represented -1-8217_94% of all
county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Community Development Department Indian River County
19
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Public Safety
The Sheriff' s Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the
Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6 . 5 , the county, in FY
20034/20045 , spent $55 ,''� , 9' ,1' 0 ,- 57, 161 ,390 . 00 for public safety services, . Between fiscal years
29022003/034 and 20034/045 public safety expenditures increased by 47:32 .451/o. Since FY
19999/992000, public safety expenditures have increased by 4039_78 %. Public safety represented
39.4638 . 27% of all county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Physical Environment
This classification encompasses the county' s water and wastewater utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal
District (S WDD), the Soil Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition
Fund . Table 6 . 5 shows that $37-145-.674--W4 5731 96 . 00 was spent on these activities in FY
20932004/20045 . Between fiscal years 20022003/034 and 20034/045 , physical environment
expenditures decreased increased by 82:2238_34%. Since FY- 19989/992000, physical environment
expenditures have indecreased by 147 . 907. 57%. Th ; h a 1 bepai4tathe
environmental ' v r T ' ' - a Physical environment services represented
K
2343 . 06% of all county expenses in FY 20042004/045 .
Transportation
Departments under this category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads
Construction, and Traffic Engineering . These departments are responsible for designing,
constructing, overseeing , and maintaining the county ' s roads and drainage systems. As shown in
table 6 . 5 , the county spent $2 ' , 03 ,'o-z34.9022 , 369 . 128 . 00 on transportation facilities in FY
29032004/045. Since FY 19989/992000, transportation expenditures have increased by 2-34966_74% .
Transportation expenses represented 46.2914. 97% of all county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Economic Environment
Included in this category are the costs of providing services, which develop and improve the economic
condition of the community and its citizens. Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the
Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce undertake this
function. Table 6. 5 shows that those agencies spent $627,914.00712517 . 00 on economic
environment services in FY 20034/045. Between fiscal years 20023/034 and 20034/045 , economic
environment expenditures increased by 7:5513_47%. Since FY 19989/492000, economic environment
expenditures have increased by 42534174. 73 % . Economic environment expenses represented
0-44' 0.48 % of all county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Community Development Department Indian River County
20
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Human Services
Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human
illness , injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The
Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children' s Services fall into this category . Table 6 . 5
shows that the county spent $ 7, 1 °"'4'7 ,279 , 582 . 00 on human services in FY 20034/045 .
Between fiscal years 20023/034 and 20034/045 , human services expenditures increased by
18:04184% . Since FY 49W1999/992000, human services expenditures have increased by
4747 . 72% . Human services represented 5-094 . 87% of all county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Figure 6. 17 : General Government Expenditures by Function
2000 2001 2002
43.1% Orn v% rzza 360% - 2. 1 %
13.Pn % °.3%
34 5� - 16.0%
14.4% -<.9°b z3o% 16.0% — 0. 3%
° 1-A n5% 144% 1 M. 4g% 1
3. 1 % 4.6% 15.3% '�. 4 .6%
2003 2004
315% 2005
39.5% .3
39 %
123% flh
17ff3% 2°% . 23•n31%
J=i3
•.54°% 43% 51% 183% 27 143% 15M
es%
pGeneral Government ® Public Safety OPhysical Environment
® Transportation MEconomic EnHronment E] Human Services
mCult ure/Recreation ® Court Related ® Debt SeNce
Culture/Recreation
All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities
for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation
operations, and the golf course are included here . As shown in table 6 . 5 , the county spent
$ 15 , 022 , 196 . 0021 .3 59.218 on these services in FY 20034/045. Between fiscal years 20023/034 and
20034/045 , cultural/recreation expenditures deereased increased by 354042. 18%. Since FY
19999/992000, cultural/recreation expenditures have increased by -149.1977 . 90%. Culture/recreation
expenses represented 18.214 . 30% of all county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Community Development Department Indian River County
21
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Court Related
All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here .
This category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney 's Office and Public Defender.
As shown in table 6. 5 , expenditures from this category totaled $6,210,614-. W5.. 630.734 . 00 in FY
20034/045. Between fiscal years 20023/034 and 20044/045 , Court Related expenditures indecreased
by 3-54934%. Beginning in FY 1997/ 1998 , the State of Florida mandated that the county begin
recording Court Related costs as a separate expenditure item. Court Related costs represented
4.393 . 77% of all county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Debt Service
Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. This figure includes
principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6. 5 indicates, total county
debt service expenditures were $3 ,727,534 . 1,495 . 500. 00 in FY 20044/045 . Between fiscal years
20023 /034 and 20034/045 , debt service expenditures decreased by -1-746 . 22%. Since FY
19989/992000. debt service expenditures have ixdecreased by 32 . 1643_58 %. Debt service expenses
represented 242 . 34% of all county expenses in FY 20034/045 .
Existing Outstanding Debt
At the end of FY 20044/045 , Indian River County ' s outstanding debt, comprised mostly of revenue
bonds, stood at $ 108 , 545 ,000. This is shown in table 6 . 6. In 1993 , the county took advantage of
lower interest rates and refunded any debt that had reasonable future economic savings. Enterprise
Funds support 84 . 6% of the overall debt (Utility Dept 76 . 7% ; and Golf Course 7. 8%), leaving only
$ 16, 050,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001 , Indian River
County issued the remaining $ 11 ,000,000 of the $26,000,000 voter approved Environmentally
Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds . This is the most recent bond series issued by
Indian River County . Also in 2001 , the County issued $ 16 , 810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds
to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility . Finally, two
bonds were refinanced in 2003 to take advantage of lower interest rates : the 1993 Series Refunded
Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acqusition Bonds.
Community Development Department Indian River County
22
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.6 : Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt
Amount Average
Initial Remaining Interest Final Bond Rating
Amount x09130104 Rate maturity Security Pledge
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds:
1993 A Series $47, 190,000 $37,515,000 5 .76% 2024 AAA/FDIC Water & Sewer
(Insured) Revenues
1996 Series $38,900,000 $33,390,000 5.75% 2026 AAA/FDIC Water & Sewer
(Insured) Revenues
Recreation Revenue Bonds
Golf Course Net
2003 Series Income, Race Track
Refunding $6,455,000 $6,045,000 3 .65% 2016 AAA/AMAC Revenues and
Recreational (Insured) Subordinate Lien on
Revenue One Half Cent Sales
Tax
Spring Training State payments,
Facility Revenue $ 16,810,000 $ 15,515,000 4.870% 2031 AAA/FGIC fourth cent tourist
Bonds (Insured) development tax, and
half-cent sales tax
Voted G.O. Bonds
Environmental
Lands $7800.000 $6,765,000 2.050% 2010 AA` /Ab1AC General Obligation
Acquisition 2003 (Insured)
Series
Environmental $ 11 ,000,000 $9,315,000 3 .890% 2016 AAA/FSA General Obligation
Lands g
Total Bonds
Outstanding $ 108,545,000
Source: Indian River County Budget 2004/05 .
Local Policies and Practices
As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current
Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in
capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county' s existing level-of-
service standards, impact fee programs, the existing comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund
accounts .
Community Development Department Indian River County
23
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Existing Level-of-Service Standards
Level-of-service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or
proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the
facility. Level-of-service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility .
Level-of-service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development
to areas where facilities may have excess capacity . Indian River County has level-of-service
standards for capital facilities as follows :
➢ Correctional Facilities (Countywide)
• 4 . 5 beds per 1 ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Fixe/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores)
• . 089 Stations per 1 ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County)
• 2 . 09 officers per 1 , 000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Libraries (Countywide)
• 580 building square feet per 1 , 000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
• 3 ,200 library material items per 1 , 000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
• 0 . 7 computers per 1 ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
• 0 . 2 other library equipment items per 1 ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal
population
➢ Potable Water (County Service Area)
• 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
➢ Public Buildings (Countywide)
• 1 . 99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County)
• 6. 61 acres per 1 ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area)
• 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
➢ Schools (Countywide)
• 139. 07 building square foot per student station (Weighted Average)
• 144 . 71 building square foot per student station (Elementary School)
• 117 . 26 building square foot per student station (Middle School)
Community Development Department Indian River County
24
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• 147 . 57 building square foot per student station (High School)
➢ Solid Waste (Countywide)
• 2 .2 tons per capita per year or 3 . 67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population per year
➢ Stormwater Management
• New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall
event
• Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during
resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm
event on local roads
• The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a
10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads
• All drainage basins will meet the following level-of-service standards :
• By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event
• By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event
• By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event
➢ Transportation (Roadways)
• Level-of-Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on
all TRIP brant ftmded roadways as well as all freeway, arterial and collector
roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of
service "E" plus 20% :
• 27`h Ave — South County Line to SR 60
• 43 `a Ave - Oslo Road to 16`h Street
For SIS./Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service `B" is adopted
for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas.
➢ Transit
• One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes
Level-of-service standards are discussed in further detail in each individual Comprehensive Plan
Element.
Capital Improvements Program
A capital improvements program (CIP) is a program for capital expenditures to be incurred each year
over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs . This program identifies projects that
the county plans to undertake and presents an estimate of the costs and the full resources needed to
finance the projects .
Community Development Department Indian River County
25
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all
elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall sevenfive-year Capital Improvements Schedule .
The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources
to implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the
next sevenfive years.
Impact Fees/Capacity Charges
Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local
government to serve new development. This financing technique is one strategy that the county can
use for implementing the CIE . Currently, the county has nine tna€fie impact fees in place; these are
traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986 and eight additional impact fees which became
effective in June of 2005 . Those eight new impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery
categories: solid waste public schools fire/ems, parks and recreation correctional facilities law
enforcement, libraries and public buildings
impaet fees; these include solid llvaqte, public sehools, firalems, parks and reereation, correetional
In October 1999, the county ' s water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A
capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of improvements in order to fund the capital
cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers .
Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to
private business enterprises, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing
the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user
charges. Currently, the county operates its solid waste services, golf course facility , building
department services, shooting range, and utility services as enterprise funds.
As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary
with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing
services further from urban areas, and less for distances closer to urban areas . In this way, user
charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas .
Analysis
The analysis section of this element analyzes the county's historic and projected revenue and
expenditure patterns to assess the county ' s fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements.
Community Development Department Indian River County
26
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
These capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are
needed to meet the demands of existing and future development.
As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal
assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included.
Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements
Objectives and polices from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, Sanitary
Sewer Sub-Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as
policies followed by the Sheriff' s office and County departments such as Emergency Management,
Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of
capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation system, the
Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of property . Also affecting the
development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements. Within the
Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the
urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements.
Using the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the county ' s comprehensive plan to plan for
the provision of public facilities and services promotes compact development by emphasizing infill
development in urban areas and maximizes the efficiency of existing facilities and services in under
utilized areas . The FLUE also controls urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be
present consistent with future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban
sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system.
Using the county ' s official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the
county ' s water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities will
provide for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provide for efficient growth in desired
areas, discourage growth in undesirable areas, and protect environmentally sensitive lands.
Development orders will be based upon the availability of adequate public facilities and services,
which will provide additional support for the comprehensive plan .
The objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water
Sub-Element, and Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element will be furthered by the extension of facilities and
services in a logical and efficient manner. This will be accomplished by implementing and enforcing
the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements .
Successful and efficient implementation of those items will ensure that facilities and services will be
in place concurrent with future development.
If a capital improvement project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements
Plan and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards, future
development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place . This, in effect, indirectly
Community Development Department Indian River County
27
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the
Future Land Use and Transportation Elements' objectives .
Directly affecting the timing and location of future development is the county ' s official Future Land
Use Map, which graphically portrays the maximum land use densities/intensities for the county by the
year 2020. As shown on the Future Land Use Map, allowable residential land use densities in some
areas are as high as ten units to the acre in the urban service area and as low as one unit per twenty
acres outside the urban service area. Commercial/industrial land use areas are depicted on the Future
Land Use Map along the US 41 Corridor and in nodal areas located along major transportation routes
and intersections .
A schedule of capital improvements (Appendix A) is important to ensure that improvements to
existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By establishing specific
criteria for prioritizing projects and by scheduling projects based on projected need and available
revenue, the schedule of capital improvements will ensure existing resources are properly allocated .
This scheduling effort will also ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus
maintaining adopted levels of service .
In addition to the components of this element, the county coordinates with the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of
Transportation, when these agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River
County . The continuation of this coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the
SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital
improvements as identified in the CIE.
Needs Assessment
Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs
assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet
proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital
improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $25 ,000
and may be paid for in phases.
Table 6 . 7 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2014-0/ 121 for conservation &
aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation and
open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, and
transportation. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects and estimated costs for each of the
comprehensive plan elements as well as adopted capital improvements of County departments.
Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each
applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective
governmental service.
Community Development Department Indian River County
28
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.7: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County
Element or
Category 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
Conservation &
Aquifer Recharge $25,370,000 $25,295,000 520. 500,000 $250,000 $250.000
Emergency
Services $ 12585874 $4,752,689 51 , 144,705 $ 1 ,500,000 $0
General Services $50.325 .027 $940,000 $620456 $0 $0
Law Enforcement
& Corrections $22187436 $0 $0 $0 $0
Libraries $8,600.000 $800.000 $0 $0 $0
Recreation &
Open Space 59, 100,000 52,675.000 $4,375,000 $ 1 ,575,000 $ 1,575,000
Sanitary Sewer &
Potable Water $32,076,700 $32. 877,000 $24,337,500 $ 16,007,500 $ 12,499,700
Solid Waste $8,591 ,500 $ 16,436,500 $2,941 .000 $4,442,000 $259,000
Stormwater
Management $ 12, 189,000 $2.842,000 $3,647,000 $ 1 , 104,000 $5,000.WO
Transportation
$84,512,871 1 $52320,711 $67,335,665 $58,928,052 $48. 153240
Total $265.538,408 5738,938,900 S12419011326 $839806,552 1 $67,736940
Figure 6 . 18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the next
sevenfi�e fiscal years. As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements, for
the five year period is $6029;680, 922 . 160 .
Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide and the
county itself does not have fiscal responsibility for these systems. The County, however, is required
by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). The
Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the management of the IRCHD,
maintains the financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county.
In the Future Land Use and Introductory Elements of the county ' s comprehensive plan, there is an
analysis and description of public schools and health centers . Based on general locational criteria for
public schools and health centers, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in
the county by 2014-0/ 121 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated
expansion areas . Therefore, these systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate
infrastructure.
Community Development Department Indian River County
29
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6 . 18 : Future Capital Improvement Expenditures
$ 100,000, 000
$90,000, 000
$80, 000, 000
$70, 000,000
'i $60 , 000,000
S50 ,OOQ000
$40, 000, 000
$30,000, 000
$20, 000, 000
$ 10, 000,000
$0
FY 2006107 0 FY 2007/08 FY 2008109 08 09
FY 2009/ 10
FY 2010/11
■ Conservation & Aquifer Recharge o Emergency Services ❑ General Services
® Law Enforcement & Corrections oLibranes wRecreation & Open Space
® Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water zSolid Waste a Stormwater Management
o Trans ponation
Fiscal Assessment
This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6 .7, and
assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budgeting framework utilized
by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required .
The assessment process consists of estimating future receipts of revenues and comparing these
receipts against anticipated expenditures . Using this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue
surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the needed
capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include the operating costs associated with
operations of the county.
Projected Revenues
The county' s revenues are projected for fiscal years 20036/067 through 2014-0/ 121 . The projected
revenues are first analyzed in this section in general overall terms . Afterwards, earmarked projected
revenues are discussed, as is the county's tax base and millage rate projections .
Community Development Department Indian River County
30
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Overall Projected Revenues
Table 6. 8 summarizes the county's projected overall revenues for fiscal years 200-56/067 through
20140/ 121 . These revenues include the county's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and
internal funds. As table 6. 8 shows, general revenue collected by the county is projected to indecrease
by 23237. 80% over the next seven five fiscal years, from $254 ,3� 6?n49319, 130448 in FY
20036/067 to $264-,�,296, 448,533 in FY 20140/ 121 .
Table 6.8: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary
FY 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 TOTAL
Taxes $ 121 ,737,000 $ 126.606,000 $ 130,404,000 $ 134316,000 $ 135659000 $526985000
Licenses &
Permits $937,000 $956,000 $975,000 $995,000 $ 1 .015.000 $3,941 ,000
Intergovern-
ment $20,340,415 $ 15,300,000 1 515 ,606,000 $ 15,918,000 $ 16077,000 $62901,000
Charges for
Services $ 16,483,000 $ 16,813,000 $17, 149,000 $ 17,492.000 $ 17,842,000 $69,296,000
Fines &
Forfeitures $ 177,000 $ 179,000 $ 181 ,000 $ 183,000 $ 185 .000 $728,000
Interest & Misc. $99,224,033 $53,205,539 $62,354. 178 $60,486,665 $60,073,533 $236,119,915
Enterprise Funds :
Charges for
Services $56,783,000 557,919,000 559.077,000 $60,259,000 $61 ,464,000 $238,719.000
Other Sources $3,449,000 $3,518,000 $3,588,000 $3 .660000 53,733,000 $ 14,499,000
TOTAL $319, 130,448 $274,496,539 $289,334,178 $293309.665 $296,048,533
Source- Indian Rivet County Office of Managementand Budget.
• Earmarked Projected Revenues
Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in
the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, and Solid
Waste Sub-Element.
Table 6 . 9 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan
elements for fiscal years 200-56/067 through 20140/ 121 . Projected revenues for transportation
expenditures are broken down by their sources as shown in table 6 . 9. Earmarked projected revenues
for the transportation element are expected to increase by 43058 .26% over the next Seven five fiscal
years, from $23 ,377, 43-227 , 354.000 in FY 20066/067 to $27, 'z 07-=28 ,350, 853 in FY 20140/121 .
Earmarked revenue for the potable water and sanitary sewer sub-elements is expected to increase by
Community Development Department Indian River County
31
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
11 .881038% over the next seven five fiscal years, from S-28 ,246, 86927.354,000 in FY 200-56/067 to
$3 -2,3 i ,9;-930 , 193 . 000 in FY 2014-0/ 121 . And earmarked revenue for the solid waste sub-element is
expected to increase by 375210 .38 % over the next fivesevert years, from $ 16 ,892, 4- i51 1 ,937 ,215 in
FY 200-56/067 to $25 , 100 , 84- 13 , 1 66,451 in FY 2014-0/121 .
Table 6.9 : Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element
Transportation
Fiscal Local 1 cent Interest Potable Solid Waste
Year Option Gas Constitutional County Traffic
p Gas Tar Gas Tax Impact Fee optional on Gas Total Water &
Tax sales tax Tax Sanitary
2006.07 $3.526,000 $1 ,769,000 3796,000 37,000,000 $12,743,000 $353,500 $26,187,500 $27,354,000 311 ,937,215
2007/08 $3, 561 ,000 $ 1787,000 $804,000 $7, 140,000 $13,062,000 $357,035 $26,711 ,035 $28,038,000 $12,235,645
2008/09 $3,597,000 1 $ 1 ,805,000 $812,000 $7,283,000 1 $13,389,000 1 $350,605 1 $27,246,605 $28,739,000 $12,541 ,536
2009/10
$3,633,000 $1 ,823,000 $820,000 $7,429,000 $13,724,000 $364,211 $27,793,211 $29,457,000 $12,855,074
2010/17
$3,669,000 $1 ,841 ,000 $828,000 $7,578,000 $14,067,000 $367,853 $28,350, 853 $30, 193,000 $13, 176,451
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate
Table 6 . 10 summarizes the county's tax base projections, which are categorized by fund, through FY
2014-0/ 121 . The countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified
in table 6. 10.
Table 6. 10: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections
General Fund M. S.T.U . Emergency Services Environmental Land
Fiscal District Acquisition
Year
Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage
2006/07 $ 14,990,697,911 3.5204 $8,480,407,340 1 .3969 $12,574,880468 1 .9911 $14,990,697,911 0.2839
2007.08 $15,740,232,807 3.5204 $8,904 ,427,707 1 .3969 $13,203,624,491 1 .9911 $15,740,232,807 0.2839
2008;09 $16, 527,244 ,447 3.5204 $9,349,649,092 1 .3969 $13,863,805,716 1 .9911 $ 16, 527,244 ,447 0.2839
2009, 10
$17,353,606.669 3.5204 $9,817, 131 ,547 1 .3969 $14, 556,996,002 1 .9911 $17,353,606.669 0.2839
2010/Il $18,221 ,287,002 3. 5204 $ 10, 307,988,124 1 .3969 $ 75,284,845,802 1 .9911 $18,221 ,287,002 0.2839
Source: Indian River County Office of Management anEudget.
As shown in table 6 . 10, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency
services district, each with a separate millage.
Community Development Department Indian River County
32
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Projected Expenditures
Shown in table 6 . 11 are the county' s projected expenditures for fiscal years 20036/067 through
2014-0/ 121 . By fiscal year 2014-0/ 121 , the county is projected to have annual expenditures totaling
S261 , 122, 000296= ,048 , 533 . In FY 2014-0/ 121 the category projected to have the largest expenditures
is the EnteFprise and 'O*h Transportation category . For the sevenfive-year period, beginning in
fiscal year 200-56/067 ending in fiscal year 2014-0/ 121 , the county's expenditures are projected to
ixdecrease by 2237 .23 %.
Table 6.11 : Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary
FY 2006/07 2007/03 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
General Gov't.
Services $42,378 ,415 $36.438,000
$36,731 ,456 $37,578,000 $37,019,000
Public Safety $64 , 171 , 000 $61 ,660,000 $63,017,705
$64,610,000 $66,372,000
Physical Environment $4, 956,000 $5,528,000 $7,350,000 $7,634,000 $9,650,000
Transportation $110,817,033 $72,639,539
$82. 146,000 $81 ,503,665 $80,338,533
Economic
Enviromnent $742, 000 $757,000
$772,000 $787,000 1 $803,000
Human Services $7,574,000 $7,725,000 $7,880, 000 $8,038,000 $8, 199,000
Culture,,Recreation $22,622000
$22,666, 000 $23, 119,000 $23,581 ,000 $24,053,000
Debt Service $5,636,000 $5,646,000
$5,653,000 $5,659, 000 $4,417,000
Enterprise Funds/Other $60,232,000 $61 ,437,000 $62,665,000
$63, 919,000 $65, 797,000
TOTAL $319,130,448 1 $274,496,539 $289,334,161
6293,309,665 6296,048,533
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
Earmarked Projected Expenditures
Table 6 . 12 indicates the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds
for fiscal years 200-56/067 through 2014-0/ 121 . These expenditures include operating expenses and
other expenses for each year. Projected expenditures related to capacity charge revenues, however,
are not included .
All revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure that benefits the payer of the
capacity charge . Therefore, the amount of revenues and expenditures increases and decreases with
development . For this reason, projecting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. This
system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below county
minimums.
Community Development Department Indian River County
33
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6. 12 : Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste
Fiscal Year Potable Water & Sanitary Solid Waste
Sewer
2006/07 $27, 354 , 000 $ 11 , 9372215
2007/08 $28 , 038, 000 $ 12 , 235 , 645
2008/09 $28, 7395000 $ 12, 5419536
2009/ 10 $29457, 000 $ 12 , 855, 074
2010/ 11 $30, 193 , 000 $ 13, 176 ,451
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Biget.
In FY 20140/ 121 , the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to
be $40;468493 1193 ,000 . That is an increase of 26 . 9310. 38 % from the 20036/067 projected
expenses of $3&, 166,2627,354,000 . Table 6 . 12 shows that, in FY 20140/ 121 , the projected expenses
for solid waste services are expected to be $ 13 , '—,21413 , 176,451 . That is an increase of
24:3310. 38 % from the 200-56/067 projected figure of �IS
$ 1 145,83- 11 ,937,215 .
LTT
Operating Cost Projections
Table 6. 13 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 20056/067
through 20014-0/ 121 . In fiscal year 201 -10/ 121 , the county is projected to incur approximately
$233 , 901 ,00023A.,326,09&in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6 . 13 , the county's
operating costs are projected to increase 22. 737 .47% between 200-56/067 and 2014-0/ 121 .
Table 6.13 : Indian River County Overall Operating Cost
Projections
Fiscal Year Total Operating Costs
2006/07 $217,6465000
2007/08 $2211895 ,000
2008/09 $2265226,000
2009/ 10 $230,6435000
2010/11 $2333901 ,000
Source : Indian River County Office of Management and Budget
Community Development Department Indian River County
34
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Projected Debt Capacity
Debt Financing, which involves borrowing money using the county's assets as collateral, is one way
that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital
facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is
paid for by those who will use the facility .
Table 6 . 14 provides a summary of the county's estimated ability to raise bonds without a public vote.
The county's bonding capacity is identified for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6. 14 indicates, the
county's available bonding capacity for the next 10 years is $418;690;040149, 800,000, with an
additional potential of $355;509;040296, 800 , 000 .
Table 6. 14: Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote
Pledge Sources Ten Years Twenty Years Thirty Years
(Bond Interest Rate @ (Bond Interest Rate (Bond Interest Rate @
436%) (a4.89%) 4 .94%)
Half Cent Sales Tax $49, 900, 000 $82 , 300 , 000 $ 104 , 700, 000
Gas Taxes $49, 500 , 000 $78 , 200, 000 $969200, 000
Tourist Tax $9 , 000, 000 $ 145200, 000 $ 17 , 500 , 000
First Guaranteed
Entitlement $ 1 , 600, 000 $2 , 600 , 000 $3 , 200, 000
Second Guaranteed
Entitlement $3 , 400 , 000 $5,4005000 $6 , 600 , 000
Sub-Total $113r4001000 $ 1829700000
$228,200,000
Possible Pledge Sources
Franchise Fees $20, 100 , 000 $ 31 , 800, 000 $39, 100, 000
Road Impact Fees $ 16 , 300 , 000 $24,400, 000 $29 , 500 , 000
Sub-Total $36,400,000 $565200 ,000
$68,6003000
TOTAL $149,800,000 $238 ,900 ,000 $296,8o0,000
Source: Indian River County Office of Manaeement and Budget.
Community Development Department Indian River County
35
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Debt Service Obligations
The county's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized in table
6. 15 . Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of
bonds. As table 6 . 15 indicates, the county's major anticipated outstanding debts are for water and
sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, recreational revenue bonds,
and spring training facility revenue bonds .
Table 6.15 : Indian River County Bond Schedule
Water & Recreational
FY
Sewer Revenue Environmentally Environmentally Water & Spring Training Ending Revenue Refunding Sensitive Land Sensitive Land Sewer
Facility Revenue
Refunding Bonds Acquisition Acquisition Revenue Bonds
Bonds Bonds
1993 A Series 2003 Series 1996 Series 2001 Series
5 . 755% 3 .65% 2001 Series 3. 89% 2003 Series 2.05% 5.752% 4. 87%
$47, 190,000 $6,455,000 $11 ,000,000 $7.800,000 $38,900,000 $ 16,810000
Balance $37,515,000 56,045,000 $9,315,000 $6,765,000 $33,390,000 $ 15,515,000
Interest $2,030, 180 5189.057 $350,817 $ 165,737 $ 1 . 813,634 $737,403
Principal $ 1 , 110,000 $450,000 $630,000 $ 1 ,065,000 $835,000 $490,000
2005
Total $3, 140, 180 $639,057 $980.817 $ 1 ,230,737 $2,648,634 $ 1 ,227403
Balance 536,405,000 $5.595,000 $8,685,000 $5,700,000 $32,555.000 $ 15,025,000
Interest $ 1 ,972,460 $ 180.058 5331 ,918 $ 146,238 $ 1 ,772,719 $721 ,233
Principal $ 1 , 170,000 $460,000 $650,000 $ 1 .080,000 $875,000 5505,000
2006
Total $3, 142.460 $640,058 $981 ,918 $ 1 ,226,238 $2,647,719 $ 1226,233
Balance 535.235.000 $5, 135,000 $8,035,000 $4,620,000 $31 ,680,000 $ 14,520,000
Interest $ 1 ,910,450 5170. 857 $312,417 $ 124.637 $ 1 .728.969 $704,063
Principal $ 1 ,230,000 $475,000 $670,000 $ 1 . 105,000 $920,000 $520,000
2007
Total $3, 140,450 $645,857 $982,417 $ 1 ,229,637 $2,648,969 $ 1224,063
Balance $34,005,000 54,660,000 $7,365,000 $3,515,000 $30,760,000 $ 14000,000
Interest $ 1 . 830,500 $ 160,764 $290,643 $99.775 $1 ,682.969 $685343
2008 Principal $ 1 ,310,000 $485,000 $690,000 $ L135 MO $965,000 5545,000
Total 53, 1401500 $645,764 $980,643 $ 1 ,234,775 $2,647,969 $ 1 ,230,343
Balance $32,695,000 $4, 175,000 $6,675,000 $2,380,000 $29,795,000 $13,455,000
Community Development Department Indian River County
36
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Interest $ 1 .745350 $ 148,638 $266,492 $71 ,400 $1 ,633,512 $664633
2009 Principal $ 1 ,395,000 $490,000 $720,000 $1 , 170,000 $ 1 ,015,000 $560000
Total $3, 140,350 $638,638 $986,492 $ 1 ,241 ,400 $2,648,512 $ 1 ,224,633
Balance $31 ,300.000 $3,685,000 $5.955.000 $ 1,210,000 528,780000 $ 12,895,000
Interest 51,668,625 $135, 164 $240,573 $36,300 $ 1 ,580,225 $642,233
Principal $ 1 ,475.000 $510,000 $745.000 $ 1 ,210,000 $ 1 ,070,000 $585,000
2010
Total $3, 143,625 $645, 164 $985,573 $ 1,246,300 $2,650,225 $1 ,227,233
Balance $29,825,000 $3, 175,000 $5,210,000 $0 $27,710,000 $ 12,310,000
Interest $ 1 ,587,500 $ 119.864 $213 ,007 $ 1 ,524.050 $618.833
2011 Principal $ 1 ,555,000 5520,000 $780,000 $ 1 ,125,000 5605,000
Total $3, 142,500 $639,864 $993,007 52,649,050 $ 1 ,223,833
Balance $28,270.000 $2.655,000 $4,430.000 526,585,000 $ 11,705,000
Interest 51,501,975 $102,964 $ 183,368 $ 1 ,462,175 $593,423
Principal $ 1 ,640,000 $535,000 $810,000
2012 $ 1 , 185,000 $630.000
Total $3,141 ,975 $637,964 $993,368 $2,647, 175 $1223,423
Balance $26,630,000 $2, 120,000 $3,620,000 $25,400,000 $ 11 ,075,000
Interest $ 1 .411 .775 $83, 169 $ 151 . 777 $ 1 .397,000 $566333
2013 Principal $ 1 ,730,000 5555 .000 5845,000 $ 1 ,255,000 $655,000
Total 53, 141 ,775 $638, 169 $996,777 $2,652,000 $ 1221 ,333
Balance $24,900,000 51,565,000 $2,775,000 $24, 145.000 $10420,000
Interest $1 ,316,250 $62,356 $ 117,978
$ 1 ,327,975 $537, 513
$ 1 ,825,000 $580,000 $885,000
2014 Principal $ 1 ,320,000 $685,000
Total $3, 141 ,250 $642,356 $ 1,002,978 $2,647,975 $ 1222,513
Balance 523 .075 .000 $985,000 $ 1,890,000 $22,825,000 $9,735,000
Interest $ 1 ,216,250 $39,881 $80,807 $ 1 ,255,375 5501550
Principal $ 1 ,925.000 $600,000 $925,000 $ 1,395,000 $725,000
2015
Total $3, 141 ,250 $639,881 $ 1 ,005.807 $2,650375 51 ,226,550
Balance $21 , 150,000 $385,000 $965,000 $21 .430,000 $9.010.000
Interest $ 1 , 110375 S15,881 541 ,495 51, 178,650 $463,488
Community Development Department Indian River County
37
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2016 Principal
$2,030,000 $385,000 $965,000 $ 1,470000 $760000
Total $3. 140,375 $400.881 $ 1 ,006,495 $2.648.650 $ 1 ,223 .488
Balance $ 19, 120,000 $0 $0 $ 19.960.000 $8.250,000
Interest $ 1 ,003,800
$ 1,097,800 $423,588
Principal $2, 135,000
2017 $ 1,550,000 $795,000
Total $3, 138,800
$2,647.800 $ 1 ,218,588
Balance $16,985,000
$ 18,410,000 $7,455000
Interest $891 .713
51 ,012,550 $381 ,850
Principal $2250,000
2018 $ 1 ,635,000 $840,000
Total $3, 141 ,713 $2,647,550 $1 ,221 .850
Balance $ 14,735,000
$16,775,000 $6615,000
Interest $773 .558
$922,625 $337,750
Principal $2,370,000
2019 $ 1 .725.000 $890,000
Total $3, 143,558
$2,647,625 $ 1 ,227,750
Balance $ 12,365,000 $ 15,050,000 $5,725,000
Interest $649, 163 $827,750 $291 ,025
Principal $2,490,000
2020 $ 1 ,820,000 59301000
Total $3,139, 163
$2,647,750 $ 1 ,221 ,025
Balance $9,875,000
$ 13,230,000 $4,795,000
Interest S518,438 $727,650 $241200
Principal $2,625,000
2021 $ ] .920,000 $980,000
Total $3,143,438
$2,647,650 $ 1 ,222,200
Balance $7,250,000
$ 11 ,310,000 $3,815,000
Interest S380,625
$622.050 $ 190,750
Principal $2,760,000
2022 $2.025,000 $305,000
Total $3, 140,625
$2,647,050 $495,750
Balance 54,490,000
59,285,000 $3,510,000
2023 Interest $235, 725
$510.675 $ 175 ,500
$2, 140
Principal $2,905,000
.000
$320,OOo
Community Development Department Indian River County
38
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Total $3, 140,725 S2,650,675 $495,500
Balance $1 ,585 ,000
$7, 145000 $3,190,000
Interest $83,213 $392,975 $ 159500
Principal S1 ,585,000 $2,255,000 $340000
2024 Total
$ 1 ,668,213 S2,647,975 $499500
Balance $0
$4,890,000 $2,850,000
Interest
$268,950 5142,500
Principal
2025 $2,380,000 $355,000
Total
$2,648,950 $497,500
Balance
$2,510,000 $2,495,000
Interest
$138,050 $ 124,750
2026 Principal $2,510,000 $375,000
Total
$2,648,050 $499,750
Balance
$0 $2120,000
Interest
St06,000
Principal
X027 $390,000
Total
$496,000
Balance
$ 1 ,730,000
Interest
$86,500
Principal
2028 $410,000
Total
$496,500
Balance
$ 1 ,320,000
Interest
$66,000
2029 Principal $430,000
Total
$496,000
Balance
$890,000
2030 Interest $44,500
Principal
$455,000
Total
$499,500
Community Development Department Indian River County
39
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Balance
$435.000
Interest $2L750
Principal
2031 $435 .000
Total
$456,750
Balance
$0
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget
Fiscal Assessment Summary
This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital
improvement needs for the sevenfive-year period beginning in FY 20056/067 and ending in
FY2014-0/ 12- 1 . Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next sever}five
fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue
source(s) . Table 6 . 8 provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year
2014-0/ 121 . As shown within Table 6 . 8 , the County will generate $ ' ,° QZz 492) ,� l 472 ,319,363 in
revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds between fiscal year 20063/067 and
fiscal year 2014-0/ 121 . Portions of the money needed for the capital improvements listed within
Appendix A will come from the $ 1 ,472,319,363 ' ,° QZ� . ,�. -Other sources will also be utilized
to fund capital improvement projects, including grants and impact fees. The total estimated cost of all
projects contained within the County ' s Capital Improvements project list is $607,027,621
680 , 922 . 126 for the next seN en five fiscal years .
Concurrency Management Plan
To ensure that level-of-service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place
which provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on
applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. This system will set the
parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level-of-service standards .
While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific
application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state
requirements, these regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and
establish its administrative requirements .
The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing
the county's level-of-service standards . For that reason, the concurrency management system must
apply to all development activity in the county. The system must then identify the applicable
standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility
capacity changes . Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available.
Community Development Department Indian River County
40
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Project Applicability
All development orders issued by the county must comply with the concurrency management plan and
meet level -of-service standards . Development orders are county approvals for construction and/or
land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist of the following: comprehensive
plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional
impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals
for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after February 13 , 1990, the
original adoption date of the county ' s comprehensive plan.
According to Section 163 .3180(6), F. S . , the impact from the construction of a single family home on
an existing lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities . State law allows such de
minimus projects to be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Prior to 2005 , however, Indian
River County allowed single-family subdivision projects to postpone final concurrency determinations
until building permit applications for individual lots . For that reason, the County could not use the de
minimus allowance in the past. With the County now requiring final concurrency at the project
approval phase, Indian River County shall apply the single family de minimus allowance to single
family building permits in subdivisions platted before February 13 , 1990 .
Service Standards
Level-of-service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the
following facilities : sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation,
and transportation. These are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements.
For each facility, level-of- service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and
the capacity of the facility . Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table
6 . 17 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility . These measures are
addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan
Elements.
Table 6. 16 : Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities
Public Facility Category Specific Facility Capacity Measure Demand Measure Geographic Scope
Transportation Roadway Volume of cars Peak Season/Peak
accommodated over time Direction/Peak Hour Trips Affected Roadways
SanitarySewer Treatment Plant Treatment design Capacity
(GPD) Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area
Potable Water Treatment Plant Treatment Design Capacity Generation Rale (GPD) Service Area
(GPD)
Solid Waste Landfill Volume in active cell (cubic Generation Rate (tons per Entire County
Community Development Department Indian River County
41
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
yards) capita per year)
Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per thousand Entire County
population
Stormwater Management Drainage Volume of water Volume of stornwater Basin
conveyances outfalling for design storm
Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project' s impact
area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand . If that capacity is not available,
the project cannot be approved . The principal function of the concurrency management system then is
to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by
project basis.
Table 6 . 16 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed
project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory , one needs clarification; this is the
geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways
will be those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. All projects, regardless of size, impact the
roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project
are impacted. For concurrency purposes, roadways that gain 5 % or more of the project' s traffic or 50
or more of the project ' s generated trips, whichever is less are included. Level-of-service standards for
concurrency related facilities are to apply to all requests for development orders and permits. Level-
of-service standards are measurements based on peak-hour trips and based on volume ranges or
average travel speed for the peak hour.
Demand
Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a
measure of facility use . When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level-of-service
for the facility .
As depicted in Table 6 . 16, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category .
While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users,
estimation of total demand is more complex . For concurrency management purposes, demand can be
divided into three types : existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for
purposes of concurrency management.
Existing Demand
Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility . For a roadway, it is the number of
peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips ; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the
existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. These figures are included within applicable plan
elements.
Community Development Department Indian River County
42
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to
capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over
capacity .
Existing demand, however, is not static . As population increases and dwelling units come on-line,
existing demand increases. These increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use
measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are
examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels . As existing demand levels
for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing
committed demand have come on-line .
Committed Demand
Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved
capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand
for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity . This estimate of unused
capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects .
Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been
reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific
facilities that will be impacted by these projects with reserved capacities must be determined; these
facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances,
and recreation facilities . Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand
will be determined .
Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility
demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the
project . Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent
residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan
Element.
Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For
example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each major roadway,
each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill . Also, like
existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed;
committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old
development orders are terminated .
Community Development Department Indian River County
43
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Projected Demand
The third type of demand is projected demand . This consists of two types. One is non-
committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13 ,
1990, while the other is new project demand .
Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts
associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13 , 1990 and
construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage . Since this type of construction will impact
facilities, the demand anticipated from this type of activity must be considered in facility expansion
plans . For this reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and
consider the impacts of construction on these lots.
The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand
estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for
each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued . Upon
issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as
committed demand.
Availability of Capacity
Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by
facilities that are existing and available ; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing
roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider
both existing, in-the-ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are
programmed but not yet existing.
According to Chapter 9J-5 . 0055 (3 ), Minimum Requirements For Concurrency , Florida
Administrative Code, the capacity of existing, in-the-ground facilities will be considered in all cases.
Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when
the following conditions are met:
➢ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities:
1 . A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary
facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or
2 . At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section
163 .32201 F. S . , or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380,
Community Development Department Indian River County
44
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
F . S . , to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163 . 3180(2)(a), F . S .]
For parks and recreation facilities :
1 . At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are in place or under actual construction; or
2 . A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the
necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired
by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer' s fair share are
committed; and
a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the
necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are
in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a
certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
b . At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities
and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the
necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or
under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate
of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
c . At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities
and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant
to Section 163 . 3220, F. S . , or an agreement or development order issued
pursuant to Chapter 380 , F . S . , to be in place or under actual construction not
more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
equivalent. [Section 163 . 3180(2)(b), F . S .]
[� For transportation facilities, except as otheinwise provided in subseetions (4 ) (7) of Seetien 9 of the.
Transportalion supplv wapacill)). Transportation supply txxst shall be determined on a
segment by segment basis. For concurrencv purposes all segments on the countv 's
thoroughfare plan mu4 shall be considered . Capacity for segments will be based either on
FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the
public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952 Traffic Transportation
supply for each segment is :
1 The segment's existing peak hour peak season peak direction capacity: or
Community Development Department Indian River County
45
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and
if:
a. At the time a development order or permit is issued the necessary facilities and
services are in place or under construction; or
1 . Al the time a development order- of permit is issued, the-Pece S.rzn. yfucrriixcs-aaa
in .. 1 „ ey- under con,d« t'
on; of
fib. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the
necessary facilities and ,.envie facility expansion needed to serve the new
development areis included in the counts adopted five-year schedule of
capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under actual
construction not more than three years after issuance of a „e«A eate o
eceupat&ythe project' s first building permit or its functional equivalent, as
adopted 1 . eal g ent five 1, .7 1 F 1
- _ - - - - -- - -- r -- - leeal mac . _ . . .. . ._.. . .. . ; . ». .,_ ..� .,... ,, ... ,.Y; ..,.
ttnptevert�er�tS The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and
include transportation projects included in the first three years of the
applicable, adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work
program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion prQiect tThe
Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies :
a.i . The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the
estimated date of project completion (for Indian River County, this is
included in policy 5 . 11 of this element and within Appendix B of this
element) .
hJi . A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer,
or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service
which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and
which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for
Indian River County, this is included in Policy 1 . 2 of this Element); or
3 . At the time a development order or permit is issued, the n ecessai: . �
facility and
SeBTiees .eis the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the xeeessaf=
€acilitiesfacility and _.p. . . _ _ _ '._ s.e. ;e the - . _ . . development to be in place or under
actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project ' s first
building permit a certificate ,.f ,. eeti.. ..ney or its functional equivalent; or
4 . At the time a development order or permit is issued, the neeessar�E facilitiesfacility and
Deis guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to
Community Development Department Indian River County
46
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Section 163 . 3220 , F . S . , or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to
Chapter 380 , F . S . , to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years
after issuance of a eeFti ficate of oeetip building hermit or its functional equivalent.
[Section 163 .3180(2)(c), F . S .]
5 . The segment' s new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the
subject of a proportionate fair- share agreement In such case the segment capacity
increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to
the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement
5 . For the purpose of issuing a development order or peFmit, a proposed ur
redevelopment « et heated mith; . the C , «t. , , Urban t c Area, shall not be
s, .1.: .,,.t t., R. o .. „„tn ..0 n. .h«.,..., ...,. «1. .. (1T c IllTGG /Z \/ \ 1 1; n !`
�Y Y 5 ,
. ., . ..T, ... 110 t. ... .. .. . . . of ..... .. ....moi...
rtation impaet generated by the previo�isly existing
d €eynlep ..t For tike purposes of !hiprev ..i. development
the actual pfevieus built use, whichwaseee�ipied and aetive as CTA 1. 1 1986 .
[ Section u3 3140/,zv > c i
r
B .Fer the purpose of issuing a development order or permit, a proposed development ffia
be deemed o have a dominimis inipaet and may not be sebject to the eanetfffeficy
=Rquirements of subparagraphs-4d 5 . 0055 (3 ) (e) l . 4. , F.A . E . , only ifIse
eenditiens specified in subseetion 163 . 3180 (6) F . S . , are met. [Seetion 163 . 3180(6) ;
—k developmeflt efder or permit within a designated multimedal transportation distrie
may be issued provided the planned ;ty designpit t improVements are
r
illy feasible / . ng range schedule f imprevements F h
b
development o redevelopment time C..., e foo: the di striet without regafel t the perie .T
of time beiween development or redevelopment and the seheduled constfuetion of the
r
«; tal imPr nr .. \ / \ Jems a ei fie ,1 : c 1 6Z Z 1 90( 1 c \ / \f Tr c
�
Regulation
No development order shall be issued for any project where the project' s demand in conjunction with
existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level
established in this plan. Level-of-service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each
project for which development order approval is required .
Monitoring System
To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of
available capacity for each public facility subject to level-of-service requirements . By maintaining an
Community Development Department Indian River County
47
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development
applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can
be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available
capacity for each facility .
The monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county ' s
planning division. Using a network computer system and data base management software, records
were developed and are maintained for each specific facility .
Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each
applicable facility are maintained in data base files established for each public facility category .
Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of
capacity section are met. thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity
determination purposes . Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to
modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed.
Table 6 . 17 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system data base file for each public facility
category . This table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total
capacity less existing demand and less committed demand . The demand section of this concurrency
management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand.
Table 6. 17 : Monitoring System Design
Public Facility Specific Total Capacity Existing Demand Committed Demand Available Capacity
Category Facilities
Peak season/ ,Annual count averse Volume estimated from
peak direction/ (average) (Total C�acity) -
TralTic Roadways (peak season/peak approved Development (Existing Demand) -
peak hour (LOS direction/ eak hour
D) p ) Orders (DO
) (Committed Demand)
Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plants Design flows Existing floVolume estimated from (Total Capacity)-
ws approved DO's (Existing Demand) -
(Committed Demand)
Potable Water Treatment Plants Design flosVolume estimated from (Total Capacity)-
xs Existing flaws approved DO's (Existing Demand)-
(Committed Demand)
Active cell Volume estimated from (Total Capacity)-
Solid Waste Landfill design capacity Active cell volume used approved DO's (Existing Demand) -
(Committed Demand)
(Acres per thousand (Acres per thousand (Total Capacity)-
Recreation Parks Park Acreage population) X (existing population) X (projected
g population for approved (Existing Demand) -
population) DO's) (Committed Demand)
Drainage Volume of stormwater (Total Capacity)-
Drainage conveyances Volume JExisfing flows allowed to outfall for (Existing Demand) -
approved DO's (Committed Demand)
Community Development Department Indian River County
48
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6. 18 will be necessary .
Table 6. 18 : Monitoring System Tasks
Responsible
Action Department Timing
Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand Engineering Annually
Compile quarterly ridership statistics foal] fixed routes MPO Annually
] dentify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Annually
Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used Utilities Annually
Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park eximg demand Planning Annually
Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances Engineering Annually
Enter data received from other departments into computer Planning Ongoing
Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total uponsuance of DO Planning Ongoing
Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand Planning Ongoing
estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for
committed demand once existing demand istpdaled
Applicability
The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level-of-
service measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore
capital improvements programming . By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available
capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By
incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital
budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need.
Community Development Department Indian River County
49
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Goal , Obiectives and Policies
Goal
It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound
fiscal decision making .
Objectives and Policies
Obiective 1 : Construction of Capital Facilities
By 2010, the county will have eliminated existing deficiencies, accommodated desired future growth,
and replaced obsolete or worn-out facilities.
Policy 1 . 1 : The county shall maintain a sevenfive-year capital improvement program and pursuant to
Section 163 . 3177(3)(b) F . S . evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future
public facility needs of the county . This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is
financially feasible and that the adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained.
Policy 1 .2 : The county shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this
element' s adopted capital improvements program. Pursuant to Section 163 . 3177(3)(b) F . S . , the
Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. Consistent with Section 9.1-5 of the
Florida Administrative Code, if any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is
delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this
delay, defer, or elimination will cause the level-of-service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum
level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust
the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall
be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the
ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DCA .
Policy 1 . 3 : The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on
following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance.
➢ Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards ;
➢ Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments ;
➢ Elimination of existing deficiencies;
➢ Maintenance of adopted level-of-service standards ;
➢ Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development;
➢ Protection of prior infrastructure investments ;
➢ Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies ;
➢ Accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands ;
➢ Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide
public facilities within the local government' s jurisdiction;
Community Development Department Indian River County
50
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
➢ Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service
areas ;
➢ Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location;
➢ Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements ;
➢ Reduction of operating costs;
➢ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters.
Policy IA : The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid
Waste sub-elements of the Comprehensive Plan . Since these are enterprise account funded elements,
capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived
from the applicable systems .
Policy 1 . 5 : The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation,
Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements
of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1 . 6 : The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road
improvement projects required to meet the adopted level-of-service standards unless the applicable
projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county ' s Schedule of
Capital Improvements.
Policv 1 . 7 : The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of
infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and
maximize the life of the infrastructure .
Policy 1 . 8 : The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the
ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%.
Policy 1 . 9 : The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that
exceeds $25 .000.
Policy 1_10 : The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures,
including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities , and to
construct new facilities .
Polices: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county
department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital
improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department ' s
capital improvements .
Community Development Department Indian River County
51
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Objective 2 : Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas
Through 2020, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or
intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map .
Policy 2 . 1 : The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation
zones for a category one hurricane.
Policy 2 .2 : The county shall not increase land use density and intensity , in the coastal high hazard
area, beyond that reflected in the county ' s current Future Land Use Map.
Polio: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only
to maintain the adopted level-of-service standards .
Policy 2 .4 : The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard
area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level-of-service standards .
Polio The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high
hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity
charges , developer dedications, assessments, and contributions.
Policy 2 . 6 : The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban
development in coastal high hazard areas ; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource
restoration, or similar projects may be constructed.
Obiective 3 : Maintenance of Established Level-of-Service Standards
Through 2020, adopted levels-of-service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities.
Policy 3_l : The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this
element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency
Management System, which implements the plan' s concurrency management system. In accordance
with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve
any development proj ect where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing level-of-service
on any facility below that facility ' s adopted minimum level-of-service standard.
Policy 3 . 2 : The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection
matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub-Elements .
Policy 3 . 3 . The county shall , concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the
infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels-of-service identified in the various elements of the
Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable
Community Development Department Indian River County
52
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the
applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such
improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval.
Policy 3 .4 : The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability of facilities to
maintain adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 3 . 5 : The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level-of-service standards for public
facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below:
➢ Stormwater Management:
The county hereby adopts the following level -of-service standard for all new drainage systems within
the unincorporated county :
➢ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall
construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour
design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall
curves .
➢ Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre-development
runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not
exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post
development discharge may not exceed pre-development discharge.
By 2010, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level-of-service
standards :
➢ Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during
resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm
event on local streets .
➢ The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a
10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads .
➢ All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards :
By 2007 5 -Year/24 Hour Storm Event
By 2010 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event
The county hereby adopts the following water quality level-of-service standard :
➢ As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite
discharge . An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the
Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an
outstanding Florida water, as required by state law.
Community Development Department Indian River County
53
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
➢ Potable Water
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall
be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a
development :
➢ Countywide level-of-service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential
unit.
➢ Solid Waste
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be
used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a
development :
➢ Countywide level-of-service standard of 2 . 2 tons or 3 . 67 cubic yards per capita for
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year.
➢ Sanitary Sewer
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall
be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a
development:
➢ Countywide level-of-service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential
unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1 .25 .
➢ Recreation & Open Space
The county adopts the following recreation level-of- service standard:
➢ County wide level-of-service standard of 6 . 61 recreation acres/1 ,000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population.
➢ Transnortation
The county adopts traffic circulation level-of-service standards as follows :
➢ Level-of-Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all
TRIP grant funded roadways as well as all freewav, arterial, and collector roadways,
with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E"
plus 20%.
• 27`h Ave — South County Line to SR 60
• 43 `d Ave — Oslo Road to 16"' Street
Community Development Department Indian River Countv
54
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service `B " is adopted for rural areas,
and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas .
Policv 3 . 6 : The county hereby adopts level-of-service standards for selected public facilities as
follows :
➢ Correctional Facilities
The county adopts the following correctional facilities level-of-service standard :
➢ County wide level-of-service standard of 4 . 5 beds/ 1 ,000 permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population
➢ Fire/EMS
The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level-of-service standard :
➢ County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level-of-service standard of .089 Stations per
1 ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Law Enforcement
The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level-of-service standard :
➢ Unincorporated County level-of-service standard of 2 . 09 officers per 1 ,000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Libraries
The county adopts the following Libraries level-of-service standards :
➢ County wide level-of-service standard of 580 building square feet per 1 , 000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population
➢ County wide level-of-service standard of 3 ,200 library material items per 1 ,000 permanent
plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ County wide level-of-service standard of 0 . 7 computers per 1 ,000 permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population
➢ County wide level-of-service standard of 0 .2 other library equipment items per 1 ,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Public Buildings
The county adopts the following Public Buildings level-of-service standard :
➢ County wide level-of-service standard of 1 . 99 building square feet per capita for permanent
plus weighted peak seasonal population .
Community Development Department Indian River County
55
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
➢ Schools
The county adopts the following Schools level-of-service standards :
➢ County wide level -of-service standard for Elementary Schools of 144 . 71 building square foot
per student station
➢ County wide level-of-service standard for Middle Schools of 117. 26 building square foot per
student station
➢ County wide level-of-service standard for High Schools of 147. 57 building square foot per
student station
➢ County wide weighted average level-of-service standard for all schools of 139. 07 building
square foot per student station
➢ Transit
The County adopts the following transit level-of-service standard :
➢ One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes .
Objective 4 : Future Development's Share of Capital Costs
Through 2020, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain
adopted level-of-service standards .
Policy 4 . 1 : The county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications
and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs
while maintaining adopted level-of-service standards .
Policy 4 .2 : The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital
improvement projects .
Objective 5 : Local Government' s Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities
Through 2020 , the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and
facilities .
Policy 5 . 1 : The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are
consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element.
Policv 5 .2 : In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all
applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve
developments in the following order of priority :
➢ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels
➢ Affordable housing projects
Community Development Department Indian River County
56
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
➢ New development orders permitting redevelopment
➢ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the
infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement
➢ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation
Poliev 5 . 3 : The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing
Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5 . 7 of the Potable Water Sub-Element and Policy 5 . 8 of
the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element of the Comprehensive Plan .
Policy 5 .4 : The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private
entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general
benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services :
➢ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi-use
facilities;
➢ More efficient land use patterns and phasing ;
➢ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures ;
➢ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least-cost
manner;
➢ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures .
Policv 5 . 5 : The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer,
Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees,
capacity charges, and other appropriate sources.
Policy 5 . 6 : The county shall finance the capital cost of non-enterprise fund supported public facilities
(e .g. , roads , stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees,
capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources.
Policy 5 . 7 : The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding
required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds,
impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources .
Policy 5 . 8 : Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be
financed by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the
county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non-debt revenue.
Policv 5 . 9 : Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by
ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment
relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of
facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or the date of
construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital
Improvements . For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the
Community Development Department Indian River County
57
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
level-of-service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level-of-service standard
for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment .
Polices: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements
of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be
those which are subject to one of the following :
➢ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within
or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements;
➢ Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent
availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project . Such modification
shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served
by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule ; or
➢ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level-of-service for public
facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed.
Policy 5 . 11 : The county hereby adopts Appendix B as the County ' s Priority Transportation Capital
Improvements Schedule. This schedule provides the project description, estimated date of
commencement of actual construction, estimated date of completion, and estimated cost for projects
that will increase roadway capacity on priority facilities.
Implementation , Evaluation and Monitoring
Implementation
An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution ofthe plan's
policies . It involves taking actions and achieving results.
For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of
these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For
each policy in this element, table 6. 19 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for
taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure .
To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken.
These include : development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development
regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of
studies and evaluation and monitoring reports .
Overall , the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of
Management and Budget . Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6 . 19, the planning
department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their
responsibilities . This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be
Community Development Department Indian River County
58
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and
assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities .
As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management
Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level-of-service standards. Through the
Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development
demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level-of-service
standards are maintained.
Table 6. 19 : Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix
Policy Type of Action Responsibility Timing Capital Expenditure
IT Maintain the CIP OMB/PD 20056-201+0 No
1 .2 Follow the CIP PD 20056-20144) No
1 .3 Prioritize capital improvement projects OMB/PD Ongoing No
1 .4 Implement recommendations Appropriate County 20056-
201+0 Yes
Departments
1 . 5 Prioritize and implement programs Appropriate County
p p g Departments 20056-201+Q. Yes
L6 Maintain previous commitments BCC/PWD Ongoing No
1 .7 Replacement and renewal of infrastructure Appropriate County
Departments Ongoing No
1 .8 Budget Management OMB Ongoing No
L9 Define capital improvement PD/OMB Ongoing No
1 , 10 Capital Budget Management OMB Ongoing No
1 . 11 Capital Improvements Management OMB Ongoing No
2. 1 Define costal high hazard area DCA Ongoing No
2.2 Maintain densityand intensity levels of current FLU Map PD Ongoing No
2 .3 Budget management Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing Yes
2.4 Maintain LOS standards Appropriate County
Departments Ongoing Yes
2.5 Funding mechanisms BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No
2.6 Infrastructure replacement strategyAppropriate County
p Departments Ongoing No
3. 1 Maintain concurrency management system PD Ongoing No
3 2 Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub Appropriate County
Elements Departments Ongoing No
Community Development Department Indian River County
59
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
3 .3 Maintain adopted LOS standards PD Ongoing No
3.4 land use decisions BCC Ongoing No
3 . 5 Adopt LOS standards BCC/Appropriate CountyDepartments Ongoing No
4. 1 Impose regulations Appropriate County
Departments Ongoing Yes
4.2 Conduct research OMB/PD Ongoing No
4.3 Work w ith municipalities BCC/Other Local
Governments in IRC Ongoing No
5 . 1 Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can
support land use change BCC Ongoing No
5.2 Prioritize captal improvements BCC/Appropriate County
Departments Ongoing No
5.3 Extension of facilities and services BCC/Appropriate County
Departments Ongoing No
Appropriate County
5 .4 Create an efficient capital improvements schedule Departments/Other Ongoing No
Government Agencies
55 Utilize enterprise funds OMB Ongoing No
5 .6 Finance non-enterprise fund supported projects OMB Ongoing No
5.7 Fund the construction of public facilities OMB Ongoing Yes
5 .8 Permitting Requirements BCC/Appropriate County
Departments Ongoing No
5.9 Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/OMB/PD Ongoing No
5-10 Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/Appropriate County 20101 No
511 Adopt a Priority Tranportation Capital Improveme
Schedule Its BCC/PWDMPO Ongoing No
BCC = Board of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs
FOOT = Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization
OMB = Office of Manaeerrent and Budget PD = Planning Department
PWD = Public Works Department
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures
To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a
mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness . Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by
the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met . Since objectives are structured, as much as
possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks
used as a basis to evaluate the plan .
Community Development Department Indian River County
60
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6 .20 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies
the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures
are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of
the level-of-service standards , adopting a capacity monitoring system and others . Besides the
measures, table 6 .20 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives.
The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital
Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding
facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis.
As part of the county' s Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually
monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level-of-service standards will be maintained.
Table 6.20: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix
Objective Measure
Timetiame
1 EExistinficiencieEincounty Eservices Hobsolete r worau[ facilities 200410EE
2 ensity ana 2020
3 LeveFof--service provided for county services 2020
4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2020
5 Completion ofthe Schedule of Capital Improvements 2020
While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements
Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan
will occur every five years . Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also
be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or
expanded. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not
only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also
provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element.
As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the
Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan . These
procedures will be used by the county to prepare the formal five-year Evaluation and Appraisal
Reports . Included in those procedures are all the format requirements listed in 9J-5 . 005 -( 1 )(a)(e),
F .A. C .
The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in
achieving the plan's goals and objectives . Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and
measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and
Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which will be used to prepare the Five-Year Evaluation
and Appraisal Reports.
Community Development Department Indian River County
61
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency
management system which is designed to ensure that approved level-of-service standards are
maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation
of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated
regulations, which will result in plan amendments.
The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by law will provide a complete review of the
plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the
development of this plan .
As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data will be updated. Besides assessing
progress , the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the objectives
should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive
Plan Elements will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's
implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element.
Community Development Department Indian River County 62
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX A : SEVENFIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Table 6.22 : Indian River County Seven Year Schedule of Improvements
• 1 , , 2006/07 200 7/08 FY 2008/09 F
Wabasso Scrub conservation Area. - Public Access $37,50 $ $ $ $ Env. land Bonds
Wabasso Scrub conservation Area - Public Access $37,50 $ $ $ $ grant
Captain Forester I lammock Preserve -.Beach Access $ $25,00 $ $0 so Env. Land Bonds
Captain Forester Hammock Preserve -.Beach Access '' $ $25,00 $ $ $oGram
North Sebastian Conservation Area - Access $ $ 15,00 $ $ $ Env. band Bonds
y North Sebastian Conservation Area - Access $ $ 15,000 $ $ $ Grant
Flinn Tract- Access "$ b.. . $35,00 i$ $ $ • nv. Land Bonds
R
Flinn Tract - Access '$ 'i $35,00 =$ $ - $ "rant
�w Harmon Oaks - Access $35,00 $ $ $0 $0 Env. Land Bonds
i
s. armor Oaks - Access $35,00 $( $ $ $0Grant
Lost Tree Islands Access Improvements '$ ' $50,00 '$ $ . $ Env, Latid Bonds
cr Lost Tree Islands Access Improvements $ $50,00 $ so so Grant
Oyster Bar Salt Marsh $ $22,50 $ $ $ Env. band Bonds
� Oyster Bar Salt Marsh $ $22,500 $ $ $0 Grant
ialstromFarmstead $62500 $ -$ $ $0 Euv. Land Bonds
1
ialstromFarmstead $62,5.0 $ $ $ $ [
Rodney Kroe el Homestead $25,00 $ $ $ $ • nv. Land Bonds
Q Rodney Kroe el Homestead $25,00 $ $ $ $OGrant
0
sm Parcel St. Sebastian Rivet Butler $25,00 $ " $ $ ':'. $ nv. Land Bonds
UAnsm Parcel - St. Sebastian RiverBuffcr .$25,00 $ =$ $ $0 Grant
Environmental Land Acquisition $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,OOC $ 10,000,00 $0 so Env. Land Bonds
Environmental Land Acquisition $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,OOC $ 10,000,00( $0 so Grant
Manage/Access to Future Ac . Conservation Lands l $0 $ $250,000 $250,000 $250,00Env- Land Bonds. 1114111 1
ana e/Access to Future Acq. Conservation Lands 1 ' $ $250,040 $250,00 $256 060 Grant
onservation and Aquifer Recharge TOTAL 77 $25,370,00d $25,295,000 $20,500,000 $250,0001 $250,000
Community Development Department Indian River County 63
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Categoryi 2006/07 2007/08 FY 2008/09 II ' I I ISourcet
Emergency Services
Emergency Svcs. Station 2 - Re lace $ 1 ,500,000 $ 1 ,300,000 $0 $0 $ Dist.
Emergency Svcs. Station 3 Expansion $312,933 $ ' $ $0 ! $ Optional Sales Tax
Emergency Services:"
Emergency Svcs. Station Expansion ' ' $2,687,067 $ $ $ $ -Dist.
Emergency Svcs. Station 4 - Replace $ 1 ,741 ,95 $0 $ $ $0 Grant
Emergency Services
Emergency Svcs. Station 4 - Replace $358,050 $ $ $0 $0 Dist.
Emergency Svcs. Station '5 - Replace $1 . 149550 $0 $ $ $0 Optional Sales Tax'.
Emergency Services
Emergency Svcs. Station '.5 - Replace $903,817 $0 $0 $0 $0 Dist,
b
b0
i'
Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace $539,819 $0 $ $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
v
WEmergency Services
Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace $ $2,452,68 $ $0 $0 Dist.
Emergencyy Svcs. Station 12 - Addition $2, 1927738 $0 $0 so 1 $0 Optional Sales Tax :
Emergency Svcs. Station 13 - Addition $0 $0 $ 1 , 144,705 $ 1 ,500,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax
800 MI Iz Radio Expansion $ 1 ,200,000 $ 1 ,000,000 $ $0 $0 Optional Sales Iax
lEmerpeneV Services TOTAL $129585,874 $4,752,689 $ 11144,705 $115009000 $0
Community Development Department Indian River County 64
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
7Project 111 I 200 7/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 I I
New County Administration Building Complex $30,995,816 $750,000 $0 $0 $00 tional Sales Tax
New County Administration Building, Complex $ 100,000 $01 $t $0 $0 Transit Grant
New County Administration Building Complex $3,984,553 $01 $ $0 $0 Ad Valorem
New County Administration Building Complex $5,579,521 $0 $0 $0 $0 User Fees
New County Administration Building Complex - Bridge $ 1 ,498,622 $ $0 $0 $0 Gas Tax
New County Administration Building Complex $27,250 $ $ $0 $0 Insurance
Public Building Impact
i New County Administration Building Complex $2, 133 ,065 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fees
C Emer enc Operations Center $ 1 ,826,402 $ $ $0 : $0 Optional Sales Tax
v
C9 Emergency Oerations Center $2,500,000 $ $ $ $0 Grant
Public Building Impac
Emer ency0 erations Center - .$ 1 ,599,798 $ , $0 s0 $0 Nees
Replacement of Courthouse Chillers $0 $0 $430,45 $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
Expansion of Fiber Optic Network $80,000 $ 190,000 $ 190,00 $0 $0Optional Sales Tax
General Services TOTAL $50,325,027 $940,000 $620-45 $0 $0
w
C
Q p Jail Expansion and Remodeling $ 18,836,340 $0 $ $0 $0 Optional Sales Fax
�1 tom. Corrections Impact
c Jail Expansion and Remodeling $3,351 ,096 $0 $ $0 $0 Fees
W U Law Enforcement Corrections TOTAL $22, 187,436 $0 $ $0 $0
New Library $4,300,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Grant
m
u
-R
New Library $4,300,000 $0 $ $0 $0Optional Sales Tax
New Libr $0 $800,000 $0
$0 $011mpact Fees
Libraries TOTAL $8,600,000 $800,00 $ $0 $0
Community Development Department Indian River County 65
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
' _ � II . II I : II : 1 ' II ' 1 1 I 110 1
South Count Recreation Multi Pur ose Facility $2,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
h
South Count Recreation Multi Purpose Facility $ 1 ,000,000 $ $0 $0 $0 Grants
u
est County Regional Park $ x$500,00 $2,800,00 $ $ Impact Fees
u
C Gifford Park Multi-purpose Field fi htin $ $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
W $200,000 $0
u
u
a
Gifford Park Multi-purpose Field Lighting $ 100,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Impact Fees
Gifford Park Security House $ 150,000 $ $ $0
$0 Optional Sales Tax
G
Oslo Boat Rarnp and Parking $500,000 $ $ $0 $0 FBIP
a
C
C Oslo Boat Ram . and Parkin $0 $600,000 $ $ $0 Grants
C
0
Fairgrounds enmieter road paving $500,00 $ )$ $0 so Gas Tax
u
i
y Parks Maintenance Facility $ 1 ,200,00 $0 $0 $ $0 Optional Sales Tax
�i
Land for.Future Parks $3, 15%000 $ 1 ,575,00 $ 1 ,575,000 $1,575700 $ 1 ,575,00 Impact Fees
Recreation and Open Space Facilities TOTAL $9, 100,000 $2,675,000 $4,375,000 $ 1 , 575,000 $ 1 ,575,000
12 " WM - 53rd Street 58th Ave. to 66th Ave. (W W-13)—
$0 $0 $500,000 $250,000
$0 Capacity Charges
'O
12" WM - 65th Street E/O Kings Hwy. (W # 12) $0 $ 100,000 $200,00 $0 $0 Capacity Charges
R 26" Effluent Main Subaqueous Crossing - North Regional $ 100,000 $800,000 $500500 $0 $0 Capacity Charges
u W.W.T.P. to N. Bch River Crossing
r� u
p 16" Effluent Main - South Regional W. W.T.P. U. S. 1 to $0 $0 $0 $ 100,000 $550,000 Capacity Charges
yC„ City of V. B.
.. "16WM - 69th Street E/O Kings Hwy. W #21 $200,000 $0 Capacity Charges
b P. g y ( ) $0 $50,000 $25%OU
R
16th St. Between 82nd Ave. and 74th Ave. (W # 16) $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 $OCapacity Charges
Community Development Department Indian River County 66
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
7(C.
I161 II I : 11 : 1 ' II ' 112" WM - 53rd St. E of Kings Hwy. 'ro U . S. 1 (W # 13) $0 $0 $650,00
$350,000 $ Capacity Charges
12" FM - 53rd St E. oC Kings Hwy. To U.S. 1 (WW # 2) $0 $0 $650,000 $350,00 $0 Capacity Charges
58th Ave.-65th St. to 69th St. and along 61 st and 651hSt. $0 $50,000 $500,00 $450,000 $350,000 Capacity Charges
WW #5)
covert Bent Pines Lift Stations to 58th Ave. FM $ 10 oof $50,000 $0 $C $0 Capacity Charges
65th St., EA ) 58th Av. & convert 8" PM to reuse main at $ 150,000 $200,00 $ $o $ Capacity Charges
s. Lat G canal
v
Upgrade 8" FM to 12" FM from 41 st St. to 45th SI. along $ 150,000 $200,000 $ $0 $0 Capacity Charges
58th Av.
a� 6" PM - 66th Av., 33rd St. to 41st SL $0 $220,000 $ $0 $0 Capacity Charges
R Barrier Beach Sewers - North Along Al A w/ Reg L. S. $0 $0 $75,000 $200,000 $0 Capacity Charges
0
'PO South Reverse Osmosis Plant Storage & Pump $0 $o $ $ 1 ,500,000 $500,00OCapaciLy Charges
O Enhancement
iConstruct In-line pump facility at Liberty Magnet School $535,000 $0 $ $0 $O Capacity Charges
a
Purchase Land for & Construct In-line Repump Facility at $0 $0 $ $ 100,000 $700,000 Capacity Charges
Intersection of 58th Ave. & 8th St.
Construct In-line Repump Station to Replace South County $Cso $ $0 $750,000 Capacity Charges
Repump Facility
C
� Construct Avenue
n & h Street
et force main to intersection of $2,000,000 $ 1 ,000,000 $ $o $ Capacity Charges
58th Avenue and 8th Street
16th Street 16" W M to ease peak hour flow & pressure $0 so so $0 $ 1 ,000,000 Capacity Charges
requirements
Improve Pump Stations $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Utility Operating
Funds
Miscellaneous Utility Relocation $7501000 $750,000 $750,000
$750,000 $750,000 Utility Operating
Funds
orth County Reverse Osmosis 14.3 MGD Expansion $9,000,000 $8,500,000 $4,000,000 $0 $ apacity Charges
Community Development Department Indian River County 67
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
FY 2006/07200 7/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 I I
Non-Master Planned Water Main and Force Main $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 Capacity Charges
Extensions
Reclaimed Water Implementation Plan $ 194, 50 $0 $ $p
$0 Capacity Charges
Service Transmission Lines - Oslo Park, Villages of Vero $0 $0 $ $0 $700,000 Capacity Charges
Beach Gardens (W 417)
Parallel Force Main to Osla Road (W. WW #4) $0 $0 SO $0 $500,000 Capacity Charges
ista Gardens Effluent Main Connection $0 $0 $225,00
$200,000 $O Capacity Charges
Vista Royale Effluent Main Connection $0 $0 $250,00
$200,000 $0 Capacity Charges
West Regional W.W.TP. 2.0 to 6.0 MGD Expansion $5,000,000 $5,000,00 $ 1 ,000,000 $0 SO Capacity Charges
L
Wetlands 2.0 MGD Expansion - Effluent # 15 $0 $0 $750,000 $0
TO Capacity Charges
r3 U. S. Hwy. 1-4th St. to St. Lucie Cry. Line Road $350,000 $350,000 $350,00 $ 150,000 $0 Utility Operating
Improvement Funds
0" W.M. Extension - 66th Av., 26th St. to CR 510 $300,0110 $ 1 ,200,000 $ ] ,500,00 $ 1 ,500,000 $ 1 ,500,000 Capacity Charges
0
0.+ 20" WM Extension - 77th St., 58th Av. to 70th. Av., then $500,000 $880,000 $880,00 $0 $(1 Capacity Charges
C arch to CR 510
20" WM Extension - 4th St., 82nd to 98th Av. and North $0 $ $0 $0 $200,000 Capacity Charges
y to 16th St (W # 19)
y 16" FM Extension -4th St., 82nd to 98th Av. and North to $0
$0 $0 $0 $ 100,000 Capacity Charges
� 16th St PM (W. WW # 5 & 6)
Oak Villas lift Station Fransfer (LS # 109) $ 157,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 Utility Operating
Funds
R Wastewater Telemetry Dataflow System $ 130,000 $0 $ $U $0 Capacity Charges
Vero Lake Estates Water Assessment Project $4,020,000 $4,020,000 $4,020,000 $4,020,000 $4,020,000 Assessment
Rockridge Vacuum Sewer $0 $15619,50 $ $0 $oGrants '
ockridge Vacuum Sewer $ 1 ,480,50 $ $ $ $0 Utility Operating
Funds
R/O Integrated Water Resource/Spoonbill Marsh $2,000,000 $ 1 ,350,000 $500,00 $ $0 Capacity Charges
Mosquito Impoundment
7th Avenue WM (Falcon Trace) $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $42,200 apacpt::]
adera Isles and Echo Lake $97,400 $97,400 $97,40 $97,400 $97,400Capaces
Community Development Department Indian River County 68
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
" rProject FY 2006/07200 7/08 II : I ' II 'all
I 1 I r
8th and 58th Avenue Re-pump $2,000,000 $ 1 ,450,00 $ $0 $O Capacity Charges
'O croon Trace WM/FM $40, 100 $40, 100 $40, 100 $40, 100 $40, 100 Capacity Charges
C: m orth W WTP Expansion to 2.0 MG $0 $45000,000 $4,000,00 $4,000,000 $0 Capacity Charges
y R 74th Avenue & 8th Street FM Extension $ 1 ,072,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Capacity Charges
purchase Site and Construct RIB for Central Regional $0
y g $0 $ 1 ,500,00 $500,000 $0 Capacity Charges
40� d W WTF Effluent Disposal
RTransite (AC) Pipe Replacement $300,000 $200,000 $ I ()0,00 $0 $OCapacity Charges
!' o Cash Flow Nee for Future Assessment Projects $700,000 $ $ $0 $0 Capacity Charges
South Reverse Osmosis Membrane Replacement $200,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Capacity Charges
$32,076,700 $32,877,000 $24,337,500 $ 16,007,500 $ 12,499,700
l5anitary Sewer & Potable Water TOTAL
Citizen Convenience Center Improvement Projects
Relocation & Replacement of Fellsmere Citizens Assessments & User
Convenience Center $1 ,463,000 Sol $ $0 $0 Fees
Winter Beach Citizens Convenience Center Phase I Assessments & User
Improvements $0 $0 $ $63,000 $ 184,000 Fees
Roseland Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Assessments & User
Improvements $0 $702,000 $ 1 ,488,00 $0 $0 Fees
Gifford Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Assessments & User
3
Improvements $0 $0 $ 131 ,000 $ 1 ,369,000 $0 Fees
,a Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Assessments & User
Improvements $438,500 $ 1 ,261 ,500 $0 $0 $0 Fees
0
rn Transfer Tractor/Transfer Trailers and Roll-off Assessments & User
ruck/Containers $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $0 Fees
Class I Solid Waste and C&D Debris Landfill
Development
Lateral and Vertical Expansion of Segment I/Segment Assessments & User
II/Infill $ 1 ,900,000 $0 $ $0 $OFees
Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill - Seg
3 (30 Acres) ssessments & User
$2,445,000 $9,070,000 $ $0 $0Fces
Community Development Department Indian River County 69
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
- gory Project2006/07 II 1 : 11 : I '
Cell 2A - C&D Debris Landfill and Infrastructuure Assessments & User
Development $ 1 ,200,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Fees
-5 Canal Improvements and Slormwatcr Management. Assessments & User
Q Ponds $5001000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $O Fees
RAssessments & User
.3New Scale, Scale House and Entrance Road $0 $0 $ $0 $75,000Fees
I= Sequential & Partial .Closure Projects
c
Sequential Partial Closure of Seg- 1 , Seg-2 and the Infill $250,000 $2,778,000 $522,000 $2,210,000 ssessments & User
$0 Fees
Assessments & User
Insure of Cell I, C&D Landfill $95,000 $ 1 ,825,00 $0 $ll $0 Fees
olid Waste TOTAL $8,591 ,500 $ 16,436,5001 $2.941 ,000 $4,442,000 $259,000
q 74th Avenue — 12th Street to Oslo Road $0 $0 $2,000,00
y $0 $0Optional Sales Tax
RFWCDWaterControlQuallm $7,760,00 $ $ 11028,00 $ 1 . 1049000 $5,000,000 Optional Sales Tax
IRFWCD Water Control Qual . Imp. $4,300,000 $ 19250,000
$ $0 $0 Grant
Secondary Drainage Improvements — I5" to 36" drainage
s
pipes to serve existingdevelopment $25,00 ` $25,0 $ $0 $0 Grant
w Secondary Drainage Improvements — 15" to 36" drainage
3
pipes to serve existingdevelopment i $25,000 - $25,00 .$ $0 $0 Optional :Sales Tax
Vero Lake Estates drainage improvements $59,250 $ 1 , 156,500 $464,25 $0 $0 Assessments
r•.
0
C00 Vero Lake Estates drainage improvements $ 19,750 $3859500 $ 154,75 $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
Stormwater Management TOTAL $ 12, 189,000 $2,842,000 $3 ,647,000 $ 1 , 104,000 $5,000,00
q
R 510 -East of Indian River & North AI A Tum I .anes $2,000,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
w
'R 510, East of US 1 , left tum at Wabasso Island lane, three lanes
between Orchid and tun le "frail .5 miles) $0 $400,000 $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
m R 510, Intercoastal Waterway Bridge (Transfer to FDOT) (1 .5
R files) REPAIR $0 $ 1 ,546,000 $ 1 ,546,00 $0 $0 GasTax
L
H
R 510 . 61st Drive to Indian River $2,500,000 $ $8,4651911 $1 ,000,00 $ raffic lm c[ Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 70
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
FY 2006/07II I : FY 2008/09 FY 2010/11Source
'R 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River $1 ,500,000 $ 1 ,500,000 $ 1 ;500,00 $1 ,500,000 $ .mritalPRlPs
R 510 - 61 st Drive to Indian River $ 1,600,000 $6 s $ $0 Gas Tax
R 510 - 61 st Drive to Indian River $0 $ $ 1 ,584,08 $0 $0 Developer Contributions
'R 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes ( LS miles) $ 178,613 $ $ 1 ,000,000 $421 ,387 $9,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees
'R 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes (f5 miles) $0 $0 $0 $ 1 ,500,000 $0 rrmtsffRIPs
-7R 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes (1 .5 miles) $0 $0 $ 100,00 $0 $0 Developer Contributions
R 510, 75th Court to61 st Drive, four lanes ( 1 .5 miles) $800,000 $0 $ $3,500,000 $0 Gas Tax
O
'R 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes 4 5 miles) S11500100 $2,000,00 $21 ,590,00 $6,757,752 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
L
O
G
CR5101 CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes : 4 5 miles $0 $d $ 100,000 veloper Contributions
w
C
R
L CR510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes "(4.5 miles) $0 $ $50010 $9,242;248 $0 Gas Tax
R 512 Phase 3, Roseland Rd. to Sebastian Middle, 4lanes ( 1 .5
miles)
$2,000,00 $0 $ $0 $0 rants/TRIPs
'R 512 Phase 3, Roseland Rd. to Sebastian Middle, 4 lanes (1 . 5
les)
$6,340,623 $533,672 $0 $0 $0 Traffic Im act Fees
R 512 Phase 3, Roseland Rd. to Sebastian Middle, 4 lanes (1 .5
miles)
$ 125,705 Sol $ $0 $0 Gas Tax
R 5.12 Phase 4, Sebastian Middle School to 1-95, four Janes (2
ilea) '.. .
$3,000,00 $1 ,230,0 $0 $ $0 Traffic Impact Fees
R 512 Phase 4,.Sebastian Middle School to 1-95, four lanes (2
des)
$270,000 :'. $500;00 $ $0 $0 Dptional Sales Tax .
Id Dixie Hwy., 16th Street to 1st Street SW, three lanes (two
Iles) $ 150,000 $0 $ $0 $0 raffic Impact Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 71
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
" nr:Pr2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 IIS I 2010/11 n
urcet
Id Dixie Hwy., 16th Street to I st Street SW, three lanes (two
miles $550,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 Gas Tax
slo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes (I mile) $3,000000 $ 1 ,050,000 $( $0 $0 ralfic Impact Fees
Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes 2.5 miles) $4,945;704 : ' $3359,40 $ $ $0 Traffic Impact Fees
Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes 12.5 utiles $0 $ 150,52 $o $ $0 Developer Contributions
Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes (2.5 miles) $1,200,000 S $C $0 $0 Gas Tax .
Oslo Road, Old Dixie Hwy. to 27th Avenue, five lanes 2.5 miles $1,494,89 $ $ $ $0 Optional Sales Tax
CI
O
Oslo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) $ 115001000 $0 $ $0 $6 'as Tax
R
L
C.
Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes ( I mile) $300,000 $ 1 ,000,00 $0 $0
$6 Traffic Impact Fees
C
L Oslo Road; 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes ( I mile $0 $ $ $ $ as Tax
F
Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue four lanes (l mile) $900,000 ;$ 1 , 100,000 So $0 i.. $0 Optional Sales Tax
Oslo Road, 58th Avenue to 66thAvenue, four lanes (I mile) $0 $ $ $0 $400,000 Traffic Impact Fees
Powerline Rd., Barber St. to CR 510, in City of Sebastian, two lanes
(.5 mile) $300,000 $300,000 $ $0 $0 Gas Tax
SR AIA Widening— CastawaBoulevard to Moorings $445,00 $0 So $0 $0 Fraffic Impact Fees
SR AIA , 17th Street to Sea Gull, add two lanes $ 199,000 $ 1,801,00 $ $0 $0 fmffic Impact Fees
South SR AIA Left Tum Lane Not on design list $700,000 $0 sd $U $0 Traffic Impact Fees
12th Street, 82nd Avenue to 90th Avenue, two lanes (I mile) $0 $0 $287,82 $ I ,00o,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 72
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
M,Project FY 2006/072007/08 I1 : I9 Ilt I 1 1 t
urect
13th Street SW, 27th Avenue SW to 43rd Avenue SW, two lanes ( I
les)
$ 112,691 $387,309 $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
13th St. SW — 43rd Ave to 58th Ave - Developer's bridge -
replacement 2011/12 -
$ 1 ,000,000 $ $ $ $0 Traffic impact Fees
13th St. SW — 43rd Ave to 58th Ave - Developer's bridge
replacement 2011 /12
$SOUM $ $ $ $0 DeveloperContributions
16th Street— 14th Avenue to US I $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Trac Impact Fees
16Nt Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two lanes ( I mile) $ $ 1 ,500,000 $ $ $ 3as Tax
16th Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two lanes I mile $0 $ $ $ 1 ,000,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax
G
16th Street, 74th Avenue to Pointe West, two Innes (5 mile) $700,000 $0 $0 $0 t$O
Impact Pees
R
L
O 16th Street— 82nd Avenue to 90th Avenue $0 $0 $ $0
G
W
ell17th Street SW 58th Avcnue to 43rdth Avenue and to 27th $0
y $ $250,00 $250,000 Contributions
17th Street SW — 58th Avenue to 43rddt Avenue and 43rd to 27th $250,00 $ $ $250,00 21st Street SW, 20th Avenue SW to 27th Avenue SW, two
lanes5 mile)
$285, 107 $0 $ $0 act Fees
1st Street SW, 20th Avenue SW to 27th Avenue SW, two lanes
5 mile)
$214,893 $0 $0 $0 $0 Developer Contributions
6th Street, 43rd Avenue to 66th Avenue, four/five lanes (2 mile) $0 $0 $ $0 $ 1,500,000 Traffic Impact Fees
6th Street, 74th Avenune to 82nd Avenue, two lanes $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 Gas Tax
6th Street, 43rd Avenue to US # 1 , four/five lanes (2 miles) $800,000 $400,00 $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
33rd Street, West of 66th Avenucxxvo lanes (25 mile $ 150,000 $0 $ $0 $0 ' as Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 73
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
FY 2006/072007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/ 10 FY 2010/1t
3rd Street, West of 66th Avenue, two lanes (25 mile) $50,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Developer Contributions
7th Street, 58th Avenue to 66th Avenue, two lanes (I mile) $500,000 $200.000 $0 $0 $0 Gas Tax
1st Street, 43rd Avenue to US # 1, three lanes (1 mile) $ $2,250,00 $ $ $0 Traffic Impact Fees
1st Street, 43rd Avenue to US # l, three lanes 1 milt $ 150,0001 Sc $600,00 ifford Road Improv
$ $ Fund..,
1st Street, 58th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, three lanes (I mile) $3,450,000 $ 11000,000 $0 $o $0 Traffic Impact Fees
I st Street, 58th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, three lanes (1 mile) $300,00 $0 $ $0 $0 Gas Tax
Gifford Road Improv,
C 1 st Street, 58th Avenue to 43rd Avenuethree lanes ( I mile) $2,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund
5th Street Beautification $200,000
y, $ $ $ $6 Gas Tax
O
53rd Street— 58th Avenue to US I , add four lanes $6,664,633 $0 $5,085,597 $219,770 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
R
F 53rd Street— 58th Avenue to US 1 , add four lanes $0 $0 $3,770,230 $0
$0 Developer Contributions
7th Street, 901h Avenue to 66th Avenue, two lanes (3 miles) $50,00 $ $ $0 SC Traffic Impact Fees
81st Street, 66th Avenue to 58th Avenue, bs lane (.5 mile) $0 $0 $400,00 $0 $0 Gas Tax
0th Avenue SW, 17th Street SW to 25th Street SW, two lanes
(1 mile)
$300,000 $400,000 $ $0 $0 ns Tax
7th Avenue, 5th St SW to 13th St. SW, four lanes (2 miles) $0 $ $ $ $3 000 ONATraffic Impact Fees
7th Avenue, 5th St. SW to 13th St: SW, four lanes 2 miles $ $ $ $2,000,00 $0 Developer Contributions
7th Avenue, 12th Street to 5th SL SW, four lanes 2 miles) $0 $0 $ $0 $7,000,000 'as Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 74
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
M4 11project2006/07 200 7/08 FY 2008/09 II ' I I FY2010/11r
ureet
3rd Avenue, 8th Street to 19th Street, four lanes ( 1 mile) $0 $ 1 ,250,000 $ 1 ,250,000 $6,500,000 $0 raffic Ln act Cees
3rd Avenue, 8th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes 2.5 miles) $567,094 . $0 $ $ $ 1 1000 006 Optional Sales Tax
3rd Avenue, 8th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes (2.5 miles) $2,432,906 '$ 1 ,000,00 $3,000,00 $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
3rd Ave, Oslo Road to County Line 4 lanes $500AC $500,000 $500100( $500,000 $500,000 Traffic Impact Fees
3rd Avenue, 49th Streetto 53rd Street, three lanes (.5 miles) $0 $0 $ 1 ,000,00 $0 $0 Gas "fax
58th Avenue, 26th Street to 53rd Street, four lanes 3 miles) $200,000 $ $ $3,000,000 $ 1 ,700,00 Traffic Impact Fees
t,+ 58th Avenue, 26th Street to 53rd Street, four lanes (3 miles) $0 $ $ 100,00 $0 Developer Contributions
O
58th Avenue, 77th Street to 53rd Street, four lanes (3 miles) $0 $0 $ $0 $2,867,R31 Traffic Impact Fees
O
h' 58th Avenue, 77th Street to 53rd Street, four lanes 3 miles) $0 $900,000
p $ $0 $0 02tional Sales Tax
ca
58th Avenue, 77th Street to 53rd Street, four lanes (3 miles) $0 $0
$ $0 $232, 169 Developer Contributions
58th Avenue, CR 510 to 77th Street, four lanes (I mile) . $0 $ $ $0 $3,500,00C Optional Sales Tax
6th Ave, 4th Street to SR 60, add two lanes $ 1,300,000 $ 10,539,710 $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
6th Ave, 4th Street to SR 60, add two lanes $660,000 $0 $ $0 $0 rants/TRIPs
66th Ave, 4th Street to SR 60, add two lanes $3,500,290 $ $0 $o $0 oas Tax
6th Avenue,59th Sheet to SR 60, four lanes 6 miles $ $400,00 $ $ $5,000,00 mftic impact Fees
6th Avenue,59th Street to SR 60, four lanes (6 miles) . $ 100, $1 ,500,00 $ 1,300,00 $750,000 2tional Sales Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 75
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
" ' � 'Project2006/07 I 1 : II : I ' II ' I FY 2010/11t
urcet
6th Avenue,59th Street to SR 60, four lanes (6miles) $ $ $ $0 $3,000,000 Gas Tax
6th Avenue from 77th St. to 59th Street $0 $500,000 $500,000 $ $ 1 ,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees
6th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes, (2 miles) $300,000 $ 1 ,000,00 $ $0 $760,000 Traffic Impact Fees
6th Avenue'- 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes, 2 miles '$800,00 s $ $0 $C Gas Tax 7.
6th Avenue- 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes, (2 miles) $0 $ $2,000,00 $2,0001000 $0 OptionalSales Tax
Traffic controllers $ 150,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Gas Tax
Co Traffic Fiber Optic $345,000 $o $0
$0 $0 Gas Tax
a+
Traffic Fiber Optic
t' $ 113,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
0
G
Road Resurfacing $ 1 ,700,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 Gas Tax
R
7r
E� Road Resurfacing M $0 $
$500,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax
74th Avenue, 12th Street to Oslo Road, two lanes (25 miles) $202,962 $0 $ $0 $ 1 .797,038 Traffic Impact Fees
74th Avenue, 77th Street to 26th Streettwo lanes (5 miles) $200,000 $0 $ $0 $0 as 'Tax
82nd Avenue, 77th Street to 26th Street, two lanes (5 miles) $0 $0 $ $0 $2 000,000 Traffic Impact Fees
82nd Avenue, CR 510 to 77th Street, two lanes 1 mile) $0 $0 $ $0 $700,000 rants/TRIPs
Misc. Intersections
12th Street/27th Avenue $200,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Traffic lm act Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 76
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
' 2006/0 FY 2007/08 FFY 2008/09 I I ' 2010/11 r
ure
Highland Drive/Old Dixie $ 100,000 $ 150,00 $ $ 7 $ as Tax
8th Avenue / SR 601mersecnon $5,000,00 $ $4,684,80 $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection $900,00 $0 $0 Sc $0 GasTax "
58th Avenue/ SR 60 Intersection $292,59 $292,59 $ $ $C Developer Contributions
3rd Avenue/SR 60- 19th Street to 26th Street- 4 lanes $0 $702,329 $2,000,00 $ 1 ,800,00 $0 Traffic Im act Fees
3rd Avenue/SR 60- 19th Strcet to 26th Street- 4 lanes $0 $0 so $9,700,00 $0 Gas Tax
3rd Avenue/SR 60- 19th Street to 26th Street- 4 lanes $398,836 $398,836 $0 Sc $0 Dcvelo er Contributions
:.
L 1st Street SW/43rd Avenue $ 100,00 $ $ 150,00 $ $0 Traffic Impact Fees
O
C.
G 17th Street SW/43rd Avenue Sc $250,000 $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
R
I~ 17th Street/A IA Intersection $900,000 $ 1 ,000,000 $ $ $0 Traffic Im ao'. Fees
Ist Strcet SW/43rd Avcnue $500,000 $50,00 $0 Sc $0 Traffic Impact Fees
33rd Street/66th Avenue $300,00 $ $ $6 $0Traffic; Im pact Fees
33rd Street/66th Avenue ` $30UM $ $ $ $0 Gas Tax
SR 60/ 901h Avenue Intersection $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 3as Tax
4th Strect27th Avenue $500,000 $0 $ $0 $0 raffic Im act Fees
isc. Intersection Improvements $204, 194 $300,000 $ 1 ,050,00 $300,000 $0 tional Sales Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 77
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
'Project. 61 2006/0
71Rou1cvud/53rd
et/20th Avenue $200,00 $ $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
. 3-lane and Bridge Replacements 5th Street and 43rd .
ver SI Relief Canal — $0 $ $( $ $ Traffic Impact Fees
. 3-lane and Bridge Replacements 5th Street and 43rd
ver S. Relief Canal $0 $ $ $C
$ Optional Sales Tax
nuc/I6th Street $50,000 $75,000 $125,00 $(1 $0 Traffic impact Fees
ver Boulevard/53rd Street $ 100,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 raffic lm act Fees
ht of Wa Ac uisition $494,896 $ $0 $0 $ 100010 02tional Sales Tax
C Misc. Right of Way Acquisition $ $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 Gas Tax
O
Indian River Boulevard/45th Street $ 100,000 $p $
$0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
O
O. Indian River Boulevard/41st Street $ 100,000 $0 $ $0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
C
R
(~ Petition Paving
12 Ave. - Stir St. to 9th St. SW $200,000 $0 $C $0 $ 'as 'I ax
10th Ave. SW - 7th St, SW to 9th St, SW $0 $75100 $ Sc $0 Gas Tax
Vero Lake Estates Paving Pro ram $283,611 $500,00 $950,00 $300,000 $ 1 ,500,000Optional Sales Tax
Vero Lake Estates Paving Program $0 $ 1 ,412,591 $ 1 ,246920 $ 1 ,896,202 $696,202 .as Fax
13th St. SW - West of Grove S/D $50,000 $0 $6 $0 $0 Gas Tax
13th St. SW - 25th Ave to 31st Ave $ 100,000 $0 $ $0 $0 ;as Tax
4th Ave. - 1st St SW to 4th St $0 $0 $ 150,00 $0 $0 as Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 78
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
!77M'
II : I ' II ) I I I rureet
Roads Fast of U.S. 1 - 7 Miles $ 100,00 $0 $ tional Sales Tax
34 Ave. - 12th St. to 14th SL $0 $0 $0 ,as Tax
I st Ave. - 6th St to 8dt Street $ 150,000 $0 $(I $0 Gas Tax
Brid es
SI/35 Av Canal =Bridgesat
$567,058 $0 $ $0 $(1 Optional Sales Tax
lath Street Brid a A $0 $693,500 $( $0 $0 tional Sales Tax
C 5th St. S W/43rd Aal $377,403 $0 $ $11 $ tional Sales Tax
y
5th St. SW/43rd Aal $ $ 1 , 122,597 $ $0 $0 as Tax
p 66th Avenue Widludes Bridges at 33,37,41 ,45,53,57,G pprox. $ 1 ,500,00lso Replacing 3 Bridges at Soutbnd)( 66th $300,000 $(
$ $0 $0 raffic Im act Fees
82nd Avenue OveD' Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave.Intersection Widen $0 $ 1 .209,307 $( $0 SOOptional Sales Tax
82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave.
Intersection Widenin $0 $0 $ $2,440,693 $0 ,as Tax
Id Dixie Hwy/SRC- included in 3 lane $0 $2, 191,335 $a
$0 $0 Traffic Impact Fees
Id Dixie IIw /SRC- included in 3 lane $558,665 $0 $ $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
Oslo Road/74 Avenue Canal $0 $0 $ $0 $0 Gas Tax
slo Road/74 Avenue Canal $0 V) $C $0 $0 Oetional Sales "fax
Bike Paths
Indian River Drive- South $260,000 $0 $ $0 $0 rants/TRIPs
Community Development Department Indian River County 79
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
" rProject FY 2006/07200 7/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 I I r
C Indian River Drive- North $260,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Urants/TRIPs
R
y
Misc Sidewalk Program $567,495 $0 so $0 $0 Optional Sales Tax
G
h
R R 512 $2501000) $0 $ $0 $0 Grantsfl'RIPs
i
Fy
Lrans nrtation 'LOYAL $84,512,871 $52,320,711 $h7,335,665 $58,928,052 $48, 153,240
�OTAL ALL CATEGORIESI $ 124,901 .3261 $67,736.9401
Community Development Department Indian River County 80
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX B : PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Table 6.23: Priority Transportation Capital Improvements
Facility From To Improvement Type Estimated Begin ate Estimated Completion Date Estimated Cost
ER-i-fU 66th Ave tndi n-4 fiver Widening-ti.;m-24o44dne:�4
Dee wq Dee 99 13 ,000,000
twkl
Widening ften-2404la�s
C42sJ-0 (;R M2 66th Ave Dec-" f9ee-49 $ 16,00010
Widening tram 2 to 4 lanes 0 000
CR S Q SL'- 75'" Ct ( 4 5 miles) Jan-QS Dec- 10 $41,69
CR 510 75'" Ct 61 " Dr w �dc ing fiom 2 to 4 lanes Ma 0y
-- . -.-. Mai -] I
{ I > nula) $ 1�5UOy000
CR 510 6l " Dr Indian River W idenine from 2 to 4 lanes Oct-08 March- 10 $21 , 150,00
CR 512 Roseland Rd Sebastian Widening from 2 to 4lanes
Middle School (L5 miles) lyov-0SJune-06 Dec-07 $9,000,000
CR 512 Sebastian 195 Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (2 Get-06Jmre-07 Aet-OBJune-O8 $5,000,000
Middle School miles)
44e-,S4 66"-Ave 7e-Ave Add lgmg ^" itch n - Sept-07 e 21500,000
43rd Ave 46a-19" St 26" St Widening from 2 to 4 lanesal Nov-971une-09
mile) May-09Dcro- 10 $8,0000015 000-000
43rd Ave 8th St 16W19th St Widening from 2 to34 lanes May-06Oet l
( 1 in e May-07Oct- 10 $23N8;WF)
, 90U0000
Widening from 2 w34 lanes
43rd Ave 8th St Oslo Rd May-061an-08 A4ay-97D0R $7,%0,00013000,000
(2.5 miles) I
53 St 66°i-Ave 58°'-Ave "'idea from 2 te " laiaes Jerv40 lien 11 $5,000,,000
eaAc 414thAve n , .+��. June-06 June-07 $11,470,000
66"'-Ave 4' 1St F#i-Fi0 Add 2 .^. March 06 Sept 07 $I IA09,0041
Oslo Rd Old Dixie 27'" Ave Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes MarehAug-06 Deem-07 &73041880$ 11 , 150,529
Oslo Rd 27" Ave 43" Ave Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes Affil-06Sc t-0 Jim-97sept-08 $2,^^n,00,,;09L550 000
Oslo Rd 43" Ave 58" Ave Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes Dec:-0SSept-O6 Jme-06Sent-07 $4{aOG,,OW9,302000
B4v 43'"-Ave 1,;S4 Widening c,�te4amre De-P {�8 $4.888._888
Community Development Department Indian River County 81
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX C : 202-530 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO) has adopted its 202-5-2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This plan prioritizes roadway
improvements through a 20 year planning horizon. Table 6.24 lists these prioritized roadway improvements. Because the LRTP prioritizes long
range roadway projects through 24232030, or contains projects funded entirely by non-county sources, it includes some projects that are not in
Appendix A, the SevenlFive Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. In addition, it should he noted that the Purre nn on LR_ _T- P ' being updEqe a
..d once complete, will include prejeets ffo n .t ' n
Table 6.24 2025-2030 Roadway Improvement Plan Table 4.9.3 of the Trans ortation Element
On Street From To Base Road Type Future Road Type Total Cost
1-95 S. County Line N. Countybine 4 Lane Freeway 6 Lane Freeway $ 109,919,000
SR 60 98th Ave 1-95 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $2,543,842
SIS Total $ 11294629842
SR 60 1-95 82nd Ave 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8, 119,445
SR 60 6th Ave Indian River Blvd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $ 1 ,864,758
0
USI S. County Line Oslo Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $ 12,064,823
a US 1 Aviation Blvd Old Dixie Hwy (N) 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $44,372,047
Z US 1 Roseland Rd N. County Line 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $5,255,518
Vi
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $ 10,000,000
Other State Roads Total $811676,591
4th St 98th Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $ 16,262,035
12th Sl 90th Ave 82nd Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,781 ,786
a
C 12th St 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $2,854,618
a, 13th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,041 ,388
c
c 13th St SW 43rd Ave 34th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $ 1 ,560,899
U 13th St SW 34th Ave 27th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,359,684
13th St SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $ 1 ,922,225
Community Development Department Indian River County 82
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.24 202 -2030 Roadway Improvement Plan Table 4.9.3 of the Trans ortation Element
On Street From To Base Road Ty2e Future Road Type Total Cost
17th SI. SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,019,519
26th St 66th Ave 43rd Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $ 13,006, 154
26th St 82nd Ave 74th Ave 00 2 bane Undivided $3 ,850,481
Aviation Blvd 43rd Ave U. S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,537,828
27th Ave S. County Line Oslo Rd 2 bane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $9,560,909
27th Ave Oslo Rd S.R. 60 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $ 12,330,699
43rd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $ 12,974,563
43rd Ave Oslo Rd 8th St 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $8,311 ,058
53rd St 82nd Ave 66th Ave W 2 Lane Undivided $9,599,620
58th Ave S County Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $ 11 ,850,325
Line/Koble and Rd
66th Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided $8,562,423
66th Ave Oslo Rd 4th SL 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,887,466
66th Ave 4th St SR 60 2 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided $8,853,565
66th Ave SR 60 C.R. 510 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36, 173,489
82nd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided $7,302,941
82nd Ave 26th St C.R. 510 00 2 Lane Undivided $28, 174, 165
Laconia St C.R. 510 C 8.512 00 2 Lane Undivided $2,679,879
Aviation Blvd Ext U.S. l Indian River Blvd 00 4 Lane Divided $ 14,387,771
C.R. 510 C. R. 512 U.S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36,369,280
C.R. 510 U. S. I ICW W 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $3,718,539
C.R. 512 Fellsmere City Limits 1-95 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $ 19, 192,929
C.R. 512 1-95 C.R. 510 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $ 13,317,010
C.R. 512 C.R. 510 Roseland Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $6,674,370
8th St 82nd Ave 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,955, 196
Indian River Blvd Royal Palm 37th St 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8,678,255
Oslo Rd I-95 58th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $ 19,484,669
Roseland Rd C.R. 512 U. S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $ 12,847,897
Community Development Department Indian River County 83
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Clement
Table 6.24 20252030 Roadwav Improvement Plan Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element
On Street From To Base Road TYPe Future Road Tyne Total Cost
Schumann Dr IC.R. 510 iflarber St 1 2 Lane Undivided 1 4 Lane Divided $3 ,974,335
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $ 10,000,000
County Roads Total $381 ,057,970
Barber St Schumann Dr U.S. I 2 bane Undivided 2 lane Divided $3,621 ,587
Barber St IC.R. 512 Schumann Dr 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $7,596,306
v Fleming St Ihasy St Schumann Dr 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,838,861
City Roads Total $ 165056,754
Total $5811254,157
Source: Indian River County MPO
F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'I\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN\2oo6 CPA\CIE AMENDMENTSNCAPFt'AL IMPROVIMENTS ELEMENT - 2oo6 FINAL DRAFP.DOC
Community Development Department Indian River County 84