Laserfiche WebLink
10?' INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RECREATION MULTI - PURPOSE BUILDING RF P # t�; , lcl <br /> �il i`.W,441 yR,M <br /> M' M 19 Y' :Yr.M'fx5 <br /> • r.:. a u.. <br /> 1 H PR (I) CES ` <br /> 9aM Program Verification and Budget Review <br /> _ This effort led to much discussion and numerous changes to the pro- <br /> : gram . It took longer than anticipated, but was necessary to achieve <br /> ' buy- in ' from the diverse group . <br /> s wawf w .Yw.. <br /> �M Y <br /> The budget was verified to be adequate, but not generous . <br /> :•:t1�91,Yff.Y . , <br /> ^ ' The Architect spoke about a ' balanced design ' , where system and mate- <br /> rial selection is made in light of the whole project . <br /> a ti LUIL_ DiNC3 'SYSTEMS ANP MAI E: RIAI_ S <br /> Paralleling our program verification and adjacencies meetings, we <br /> con-ducted a four- hour seminar/discussion on alternative HVAC design . In <br /> that forum , we described and listed pros and cons for five possible sys- <br /> Y `LL " ' ""` tems, ranging from using water cooled chillers with hot water boilers <br /> serving floor mounted central station air handlers w/ VAV's, to roof top <br /> mounted DX heat pumps . <br /> , ftVT Ww, " The Main Points at Issue : <br /> ti " ' • Discovering which of these systems was acceptable <br /> - -w� to Physical Facilities . <br /> • Narrowing the list to two or three systems, and <br /> ft.' 4 performing a Life Cycle Cost Analysis on each . <br /> Exterior Wall SectionFIGURE 2a • Determining whether or not roof top equipment <br /> Brick Veneer on CMU was acceptable, as this decision had impact on <br /> the design of the floor plan , overall size of the <br /> building and its cost . <br /> • ffi T The Architect's main concern was that if the most expensive system was <br /> 16:1.0 Ic selected , the material selection would suffer. The group was cautioned <br /> to remember that life cycle cost must include maintenance to interior <br /> -- and exterior finishes as well as mechanical systems . <br /> . . 4 <br /> At this early stage we explored alternative exterior wall systems and <br /> priced them , in order to evaluate one key architectural component and <br /> si A, its cost in parallel with major MEP decisions . <br /> See FIGURE 2a & 2b . <br /> 1P IThis effort led to good decisions , because everyone involved had all the <br /> M - information . <br /> 0 <br /> _... � .fir r. -• . , .. <br /> C. <br /> ... rw'a na • rr <br /> G <br /> yf .. i al. ...._ .. <br /> Exterior Wall Section FIGURE 2b <br /> Brick Veneer on Metal Studs <br /> PP I Construction Management ♦ Pon i k v a r & Associates 5 <br />