Laserfiche WebLink
�` INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RECREATION MULTI - PURPOSE BUILDING RFP # 6C) G : <br /> QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN SECTION <br /> fir+' <br /> Instilling quality in performance, product and delivery begins on our con- <br /> struction projects well before the first shovel of dirt is moved . Our Project <br /> Teams are committed to high standards of quality. Our expectations of <br /> quality and professionalism extend to the Owners, design teams and <br /> trade contractors with whom we work. And , our pledge to uphold quality <br /> extends well beyond simply directing subcontractors to adhere to the <br /> contract documents . <br /> Specific issues relevant to our Quality Assurance Program include : <br /> C. ONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW <br /> Throughout the design phase, we analyze the project documents regard- <br /> � � � +i ing potential construction sequence and system conflicts . This input is <br /> i, A7W important in both the review of construction materials and selected sys- <br /> '' . <� ` tems . The value of constructability reviews are of greatest value early in <br /> the design as major system decisions are developed . In the past this input <br /> has revolved largely around structural systems (steel vs . concrete) but now <br /> many other opportunities will present themselves as we evaluate other <br /> means and methods of delivery in the details of subsystems . <br /> LEVEL OF FINISH <br /> In defining project scope , it is as important to discuss and understand the <br /> level of finish expected in the facility as it is to understand the required <br /> net assignable square feet . The reason this is important during the design <br /> phase is to preserve the desired level of finish rather than make it a target <br /> for cost reductions if the estimated cost begins to creep as the design <br /> progresses . Another important factor is understanding that the level of fit <br /> and finish can vary in different spaces within the facility providing oppor- <br /> tunities to create the desired quality and image in the facility while main - <br /> taining the integrity of the balance between scope and budget . <br /> (.2UALI1Y AS RELATED '1­0 VALUE FNC') INEERING <br /> Plainly speaking , Value Engineering means " Cost Reduction " . The central <br /> issue is how do you reduce cost and maintain quality. Reducing cost by <br /> decreasing the size of the building or reducing the level of finish does not <br /> represent a successful approach to value engineering . We look for sys- <br /> tems that are transparent to the owner. These include building systems <br /> that look the same but have more economical assemblies and construc- <br /> tion sequences that save time, which reduce general condition costs . The <br /> value analysis group that generates these ideas includes the people that <br /> actually take off the project as well as the project manager, the superin- <br /> tendent who are part of the PPI / Ponikvar preconstruction team . <br /> REVIEW OF DESIGN SC1BM1 � Ai._ <br /> Complete review of Design Submittals is conducted by each member of <br /> the preconstruction team . This includes the Directors of Preconstruction <br /> and Operations, the Project Manager, the Superintendent and the MEP <br /> Systems Coordinator. They are not only looking at budgeting impacts but <br /> also constructability, construction sequencing , coordination issues and <br /> potential conflicts between design disciplines . <br /> PPI Construction Management ♦ Ponikvar & Associates 28 <br />