My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-176
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2004
>
2004-176
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2016 10:17:15 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 7:52:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Application
Approved Date
07/20/2004
Control Number
2004-176
Agenda Item Number
11.J.3
Entity Name
St. Johns River Water Management District
Subject
Alternative Water Supply Construction
Cost-Share Program Application Form 2004-2005
Grand Harbor Mosquito Impoundment
Mangrove Restoration
Archived Roll/Disk#
3210
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4194
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SJRWMD Alternative Water Supply Construction Cost-Sharing Application Form 2004-2005 <br /> If yes, was the previous phase indicated to be a part of a multi-year project at the time of application? <br /> Yes® No[:] <br /> Is the proposed project part of a master water or wastewater plan? Yes® No[:] <br /> If yes, attach a copy of relevant page(s) of the plan behind this page. <br /> 11. Is the project a cooperative or regional effort with one or more other organizations or agencies, <br /> other than the applicant and SJRWMD? Is the project regionally significant? <br /> Yes ® Non <br /> If yes, list other participants and what each one contributes to the project. If the project has <br /> cooperators or other sources of cost-share funding, please list the amounts contributed by the <br /> cooperators or cost-share agencies. <br /> Indian River County is working in conjunction with the City of Vero Beach and Indian River Farms <br /> Water Control District to achieve the same means. <br /> EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 11-11: <br /> Is the project a cooperative or regional effort with one or more other organizations, agencies, or <br /> governmental entities? Is the project regionally significant? 140 points. Based on rater's assessment of <br /> the level and significance of support provided by other parties, with greater cooperation or regional significance <br /> getting more points. <br /> OTHER EVALUATION FACTORS <br /> 1. Rater' s evaluation. 040 points . Rater's overall assessment and other relevant factors not specifically <br /> addressed elsewhere. <br /> 2. Has the applicant followed directions as instructed in preparing the application? [-5]4 points. <br /> Points will be taken away from an applicant' s score for failure to follow directions. Noncompliance, <br /> and/or the applicant included a large amount of unnecessary information = (4 - -5), the applicant followed <br /> directions and included just the relevant information required = 0. <br /> C. Supporting Materials. Attach the following items to this application form and check the <br /> appropriate boxes. (Additional information may be requested if needed.) <br /> 1. Project budget summary. Provide a one-page project budget summary listing project <br /> expenses by major categories. <br /> 2. General specifications and plans. Submit a generalized sketch with enough detail that <br /> the evaluating committee will understand what is to be constructed and a one-page <br /> written summary of sizes and capacities of the project and major components. Fit all <br /> A-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.