Laserfiche WebLink
Trent be rehired as Civil.Defense Director for the ensuing year. <br />Mr. Trent, noting that the members:►:'of the Board of County <br />Commissioners automatically become members'of the Civil Defense Council, <br />requested the new members to name an alternate to the Council. <br />The Chairman then asked if there were any corrections to the. <br />minutes of December 2, 21 and 22, 1966. Commissioner Macdonald asked <br />that the minutes of December 21 be corrected to read " Administrator to <br />review the list of equipment for the Road and Bridge Department" rather <br />than Sebastian Inlet Park Concession. On Motion by Commissioner Macdonald, <br />seconded by Commissioner McCullers and carried, the minutes. of December 2 <br />and 22, were approved as written and the minutes of December 21, approved <br />,as corrected. <br />On Motion by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner <br />McCul].ers and unanimously. carried, a request•from Edwin S. Schmucker, <br />that the traffic counter be sent to him, was denied. <br />Mr. Jennings reported that a mobile home is parked at Sebastian <br />'Inlet Subdivision on property•owned by Vance, Poe and Prou].x, in violation <br />of R1 zoning in that area. The Board requested the. County Administrator <br />to notify the owner.of the violation and request its removal. <br />The County Administrator reported that he.had re-evaluated the <br />present equipment and proposed purchases of the. Road and Bridge Department <br />as requested by the Board and recommended the following: <br />1. Replace six trucks, rather than purchase two as orJ,ginally <br />planned, because of the age of the present trucks and the fact that local <br />agencies no longer carry repair parts for them. <br />2. After delivery of the trucks,,when money becomes available, <br />.then re-evaluate whether a grader or another bulldozer should be purchased. <br />Mr. Jennings felt that the County could operate without'a new motor grader, <br />lout, in his opinion, in the event the Viet Nam War were expanded, the <br />'1ulldozer would be difficult to obtain. Since the County has only one <br />D�-7, he recommended the purchase of a D1-6, rather than a D-4 as originally <br />suggested. He also pointed out the possibility of the joint land -fill <br />project with the City of Vero Beach would tie up one machine, and also, <br />that in the event of a machine breakdown, the D-4 could not carry the <br />JAN 419i MOK . 10 PAtt 148 <br />