Laserfiche WebLink
indicate in writing a recommendation of payment tion of any payment, including final payment, will <br /> and present the Application to OWNER or return the impose responsibility on ENGINEER to supervise, <br /> Application to CONTRACTOR indicating in writing direct, or control the Work or for the means, meth- <br /> ENGINEER' s reasons for refusing to recommend ods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of <br /> payment. In the latter case, CONTRACTOR may construction, or the safety precautions and programs <br /> make the necessary corrections and resubmit the incident thereto, or for CONTRACTOR' s failure to <br /> Application. comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to <br /> CONTRACTOR' s performance of the Work. <br /> 2 . ENGINEER' s recommendation of any Additionally, said review or recommendation will <br /> payment requested in an Application for Payment not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make <br /> will constitute a representation by ENGINEER to any examination to ascertain how or for what <br /> OWNER, based on ENGINEER' s observations on purposes CONTRACTOR has used the moneys paid <br /> the Site of the executed Work as an experienced and on account of the Contract Price, or to determine <br /> qualified design professional and on ENGINEER's that title to any of the Work, materials, or equipment <br /> review of the Application for Payment and the has passed to OWNER free and clear of any Liens. <br /> accompanying data and schedules, that to the best of <br /> ENGINEER' s knowledge, information and belief: 5 . ENGINEER may refuse to recommend <br /> the whole or any part of any payment if, in <br /> a. the Work has progressed to the point ENGINEER' s opinion, it would be incorrect to <br /> indicated; make the representations to OWNER referred to in <br /> paragraph 14 .02 .B .2 . ENGINEER may also refuse <br /> b. the quality of the Work is generally in to recommend any such payment or, because of <br /> accordance with the Contract Documents (sub- subsequently discovered evidence or the results of <br /> ject to an evaluation of the Work as a function- subsequent inspections or tests, revise or revoke any <br /> ing whole prior to or upon Substantial Comple- such payment recommendation previously made, to <br /> tion, to the results of any subsequent tests called such extent as may be necessary in ENGINEER' s <br /> for in the Contract Documents, to a final deter- opinion to protect OWNER from loss because : <br /> urination of quantities and classifications for <br /> Unit Price Work under paragraph 9.08, and to a. the Work is defective, or completed <br /> any other qualifications stated in the Work has been damaged, requiring correction or <br /> recommendation); and replacement; <br /> c. the conditions precedent to b. the Contract Price has been reduced by <br /> CONTRACTOR' s being entitled to such pay- Written Amendment or Change Orders; <br /> meat appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it <br /> is ENGINEER' s responsibility to observe the c. OWNER has been required to correct <br /> Work. defective Work or complete Work in accordance <br /> with paragraph 13 .09; or <br /> 3 . By recommending any such payment <br /> ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have d. ENGINEER has actual knowledge of the <br /> represented that: (i) inspections made to check the occurrence of any of the events enumerated in <br /> quality or the quantity of the Work as it has been paragraph 15 .02.A. <br /> performed have been exhaustive, extended to every <br /> aspect of the Work in progress, or involved detailed New paragraphs 14.02 .B.5.e and f have been added. <br /> inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> specifically assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract <br /> Documents; or (ii) that there may not be other Paragraph 14.02.C.1 has been deleted and replaced with <br /> matters or issues between the parties that might a new paragraph. See the Supplementary Conditions. <br /> entitle CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally by C. Payment Becomes Due <br /> OWNER or entitle OWNER to withhold payment to <br /> CONTRACTOR. L :Fen – days—afier pfesentation of the <br /> rcppaxocsrivn fAI P,3yfnent to mrrrasv�iix: <br /> 4. Neither ENGINEER' s review of ' <br /> CONTRACTOR' s Work for the purposes of recom <br /> mending payments nor ENGINEER' s recommenda- <br /> Rev . 03 / 2006 Egret Marsh <br /> 00700 - 40 <br />