2014-028C - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CLARIFICATIONS / CORRECTIONS/QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES The following questions (with responses) have been received by Indian River County: QUESTION NO. 1 Referencing Sheets C 1.30 and C 2.20: The drawings Indicates to "Repair Existing Overhead Wood Baffles #4 & #5" Please identify to what extent the Baffles need to be "Repaired". Who will identify how and to what extent the Baffles need to be repaired. ANSWER NO. 1 Sheet C2.20 clearly shows the wood blocking, wood supports, steel, and hardware needed to repair baffles 4 and 5. QUESTION NO. 2 General Question: Due to the possibility of lead contamination to the Baffles, does the County see the need for a lead inspection. If the County has performed a lead inspection, will this be provided? ANSWER NO. 2 No, the County does not expect any need for lead inspection. Due to Florida State Statutes and the Best Management Practices the range has in place, the range is exempt from lead regulation. The Baffle repairs include adding material to the baffles and do not require any material removal. QUESTION NO. 3 The plans say to use Hog wire fence material but the detail on page c2.10 show a barbed wire style fence. Which style do they actually want installed? ANSWER NO. 3 The fence detail has been revised and is included on the attached Sheet C2.10. The proposed fence will match the existing fence and consists of both hog wire and barbed wire. QUESTION NO. 4 On the fence post material specification it calls for cedar post, will the county except a substitute of PT post instead? ANSWER NO. 4 The fence detail has been revised and is included on the attached Sheet C2.10. The proposed fence will match the existing fence with PT posts. Page 2 of 5 E:\Public \Forks\ENG INE_ERIVu DIVISION PROJEC1:S'12I3-IRir Shooting. Range -Skeet & Trap Improvemr.nis F I Rimers Train Bid_` =,dmirrAbij cicxa!mentt:',Aciiien,inm a I\AA,irn.i n„ Mr,