Laserfiche WebLink
A. Construction of er new through lanes; <br />b2. Construction of new turn lanes (not related to the project site); <br />C-31 Construction of new bridges; <br />d4. Construction of new drainage facilities in conjunction with new roadway <br />construction; <br />e-5. Purchase and installation of traffic signalization, including new upgraded <br />signalization and other traffic control devices (not related to the project site); <br />fg. Construction of curbs, medians, and shoulders (not related to the project site); and <br />(-I 11) In order to maintain the pro rata or proportionate share purpose of the Fair Share Roadway <br />Improvement Ordinance, it is necessary that a uniform method be used countywide in determining credit <br />against fee. Therefore, the county, when considering compensation or credit for the road right-of-way, shall <br />apply the right-of-way standards it has established in the unincorporated areas throughout the entire county. <br />i.e—., Accordingly, dedication of the minimum local road widths (sixty (60) feet with swale; fifty (50) feet with <br />curb and gutter) is non -compensable, thus putting the unincorporated areas and the incorporated areas in the <br />same posture thereby maintaining the integrity of the pro rata or proportionate share concept. <br />(12 4) Credits shall not be transferable from one project or development to another without the <br />approval of the county administrator or his designee. Credit <br />Aransfers may be approved only when the project or <br />development where the credits are being transferred from is within the same impact fee benefit district as the <br />project or development where the credits are being transferred to. upen a finding by the board of eounty <br />eemfnissienefs that the dedieation E)r- fight of ;,Nray of fead eenstfuetieft far- Arhieh the efedit was given <br />befiefits suehd:ffe nt et foo distfiets <br />(Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90; Ord. No. 92-39, § 289 9-29-92) <br />g-7. Relocating <br />utilities <br />to accommodate new roadway construction. <br />Review of fee <br />(-I 11) In order to maintain the pro rata or proportionate share purpose of the Fair Share Roadway <br />Improvement Ordinance, it is necessary that a uniform method be used countywide in determining credit <br />against fee. Therefore, the county, when considering compensation or credit for the road right-of-way, shall <br />apply the right-of-way standards it has established in the unincorporated areas throughout the entire county. <br />i.e—., Accordingly, dedication of the minimum local road widths (sixty (60) feet with swale; fifty (50) feet with <br />curb and gutter) is non -compensable, thus putting the unincorporated areas and the incorporated areas in the <br />same posture thereby maintaining the integrity of the pro rata or proportionate share concept. <br />(12 4) Credits shall not be transferable from one project or development to another without the <br />approval of the county administrator or his designee. Credit <br />Aransfers may be approved only when the project or <br />development where the credits are being transferred from is within the same impact fee benefit district as the <br />project or development where the credits are being transferred to. upen a finding by the board of eounty <br />eemfnissienefs that the dedieation E)r- fight of ;,Nray of fead eenstfuetieft far- Arhieh the efedit was given <br />befiefits suehd:ffe nt et foo distfiets <br />(Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90; Ord. No. 92-39, § 289 9-29-92) <br />Prior to the adoption of the annual budget in every even numbered year, the board of county <br />commissioners shall receive a report from the county administrator or his designee on the review of the "fair <br />share roadway improvements fee" schedule in section 953.07(2)(a), along with any recommended changes <br />in the fee schedule. Changes in the schedule shall be based on any revisions to the population projections <br />for the county, travel characteristics, road costs or inflation. <br />(Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90) <br />Section <br />953.11. <br />Review of fee <br />schedule. <br />Prior to the adoption of the annual budget in every even numbered year, the board of county <br />commissioners shall receive a report from the county administrator or his designee on the review of the "fair <br />share roadway improvements fee" schedule in section 953.07(2)(a), along with any recommended changes <br />in the fee schedule. Changes in the schedule shall be based on any revisions to the population projections <br />for the county, travel characteristics, road costs or inflation. <br />(Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90) <br />Coding: <br />in th-^ā€ž <br />type <br />deletions <br />from law. Words <br />words <br />strike <br />are existing <br />underlined are <br />additions. <br />12 <br />