Laserfiche WebLink
has been prepared for approval by the Board of County Com <br />missioners; that the minutes of the Board of County Commis- <br />sioners show that upon a printing of the recommended compre- <br />hensive master plan, public hearings would be held for the <br />purposes of approving and adopting said plan; that it <br />plaintiffs' belief that, were defendant and its agencies to <br />usetheir best efforts, said adoption of a comprehensive <br />mrster plan could be accomplished within a relatively short <br />period. , <br />(16) On.or about May of 1973, Indian River County, by <br />and through its County Commissioners, held a public hearing <br />following notice duly published for the purpose of considering <br />and approving the adoption of a comprehensive land use plan af- <br />fecting property surrounding State Road 60 in Indian River County, <br />Florida; that said comprehensive master plan was adopted in accor- <br />dance with the formalities required for the adontior. or Ordinances; <br />that concurrent with the adoption of said comprehensive master plan, <br />all zoning districts which conflict or were inconsistent with the <br />comprehensive master plan as adopted were rezoned according to the <br />criteria of said comprehensive master plan. <br />(17) Plaintiffs contend that the actions threatened by the <br />Indian River County Zoning Commission and County Commission would <br />cause irreparable harm to plaintiffs in that: <br />(a) To approve mzoning applications while the preparation <br />aria adoption of a ronprehe-osive Zana use plan is emm•inent wouldhave <br />have <br />the ef£ec t of diluting or usurping and possibly circwventing the <br />effect -of a comprehensive land use plan when adopted, thus resulting <br />in a squandering, misapplication and waste of tax funds previously <br />invested in the,study and development of said comprehensive land <br />Page Five. <br />- 26 -- <br />9 enaK $7 <br />AUG N 2 �qV%d �, c' � � PAA73 <br />s: <br />Y <br />' <br />Y <br />has been prepared for approval by the Board of County Com <br />missioners; that the minutes of the Board of County Commis- <br />sioners show that upon a printing of the recommended compre- <br />hensive master plan, public hearings would be held for the <br />purposes of approving and adopting said plan; that it <br />plaintiffs' belief that, were defendant and its agencies to <br />usetheir best efforts, said adoption of a comprehensive <br />mrster plan could be accomplished within a relatively short <br />period. , <br />(16) On.or about May of 1973, Indian River County, by <br />and through its County Commissioners, held a public hearing <br />following notice duly published for the purpose of considering <br />and approving the adoption of a comprehensive land use plan af- <br />fecting property surrounding State Road 60 in Indian River County, <br />Florida; that said comprehensive master plan was adopted in accor- <br />dance with the formalities required for the adontior. or Ordinances; <br />that concurrent with the adoption of said comprehensive master plan, <br />all zoning districts which conflict or were inconsistent with the <br />comprehensive master plan as adopted were rezoned according to the <br />criteria of said comprehensive master plan. <br />(17) Plaintiffs contend that the actions threatened by the <br />Indian River County Zoning Commission and County Commission would <br />cause irreparable harm to plaintiffs in that: <br />(a) To approve mzoning applications while the preparation <br />aria adoption of a ronprehe-osive Zana use plan is emm•inent wouldhave <br />have <br />the ef£ec t of diluting or usurping and possibly circwventing the <br />effect -of a comprehensive land use plan when adopted, thus resulting <br />in a squandering, misapplication and waste of tax funds previously <br />invested in the,study and development of said comprehensive land <br />Page Five. <br />- 26 -- <br />9 enaK $7 <br />AUG N 2 �qV%d �, c' � � PAA73 <br />s: <br />Y <br />