Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM to Board of County Commissioners <br />September 13, 1973 <br />Page 3 <br />County be allowed to build a second plant and would it be eligible <br />for a grant? <br />E. P. A. Answer: Alot of headshaking and looks of ` . <br />consternation; comments:such as .the City could nofi <br />or wouUnot (no satisfactory answer as 'far as f was ' <br />concerned). <br />The meeting concluded with E. P. A. requesting the. following <br />things be done: <br />k <br />1. County. and City revise agreement to delete Indian River <br />Shores from City area and put it in County area and make. agreement <br />legally binding. ° i` i,• <br />2. City submit figures to justify grant without Indian River' <br />- <br />Shores: <br />3. County and Indian River Shores prepare and submit an <br />engineering proposal on what is planned to handle County.and Indian <br />River Shores sewer and .water. . <br />MY :COMMENTS: <br />-° <br />Thegreatest long-range Problem is what happens. if •E P.A* <br />j <br />decides the City gets its grant and must serve County residents a- <br />round the City and then the City plant runs out of capacity and the <br />Citywon It expand. It is unknown whether E. P. A. or D. P C mould-, Y <br />' <br />allow the County to build another plant as this would be in violation <br />of the regional concept. One fact that has been overlooked in all of <br />E' <br />this3is that D. P A. has told the City that this is the last plant ex- <br />_ y <br />pansio' that will be allowed at the present site. To further expand, ` <br />(to tpk care of County residents) future expansion will be somewhere <br />` <br />elseTo me the most logical way would be for the County to build <br />one large plant or two smaller plants and plan on eventually handling <br />all Se4erage in County. Mayor Miller has informed me that F.,H.A. <br />- <br />told hien it would be possible for us to get another extension on F. H. A's <br />co4nittment,if we needed it. <br />Y <br />SEP 171973 <br />t <br />