My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/19/1973
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1973
>
9/19/1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:26:53 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 2:42:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAIRMAN Loy ASKED THE ATTORNEY WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN <br />TAKEN BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH REGARDING THE INSTALLATION OF <br />STREET LIGHTS IN THE ROCK 'RIDGE SUBDIVISION. <br />ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT HE HAS WRITTEN A LETTER <br />TO JOHN V. LITTLE, CITY MANAGER REGARDING THE INSTALLATION OF <br />THE STREET LIGHTS, BUT HAS NOT RECEIVED AN ANSWER, HE STATED <br />HE WILL SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH MR. LITTLE. <br />DEAN LUETHJE, ENGINEER REPRESENTING BREEZY VILLAGE <br />SUBDIVISION APPEARED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SEWER AND WATER <br />i <br />FRANCHISE, BUT FOUND THAT DUE TO A LAPSE OF TIME THIS HAD NOT <br />BEEN ADVERTISED AGAIN. <br />WHILE MR, LUETHJE WAS PRESENT, THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />STATED THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME DISCUSSION BY THE BOARD RE- <br />GARDING CLARIFICATION BY THE DEVELOPER ON INGRESS AND EGRESS <br />INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THAT THE <br />ROAD FROM U.S. #1 TO THE FLORIDA EAST COAST IS A DEDICATED <br />COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 30 FEET. THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY IS TOO NARROW <br />TO HANDLE THE MOBILE HOMES AND TRAVEL TRAILERS THAT WILL BE <br />COMING INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT AND HE SUGGESTED THAT THIS RIGHT-OF- <br />WAY BE WIDENED TO 60 FEET. <br />MR. LUETHJE STATED THAT IN HIS OPINION, THE DEVELOPER <br />WOULD BE WILLING TO DONATE THE ADDITIONAL 30 FEET AND WILL CONTACT <br />THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD REGARDING DEDICATING 30 FEET <br />TO WIDEN THE RAILROAD CROSSINGi <br />THE BOARD REQUESTED THAT THE DEVELOPER INVESTIGATE <br />THE COST AND AVAILABILITY OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE RAILROAD <br />CROSSING. THE BOARD STATED THAT THIS SHOULD BE DONE BEFORE ANY <br />UTILITY PERMITS ARE ISSUED. <br />-;THE ADMINISTRATOR POINTED OUT THAT THE ABOVE DISCUSSED <br />ROAD CONTINUES TO THE END OF THIS SUBDIVISION. THE COUNTY HAS <br />BEEN GRADING AND MAINTAINING THIS PORTION OF THE ROAD ALTHOUGH <br />IT IS NOT A DEDICATED COUNTY ROAD. THE BOARD STATED THAT <br />THE COUNTY'SHOULD NOT BE MAINTAINING THIS PORTION OF ROAD. <br />MR, LUETHJE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD DISCUSS <br />THIS MATTER WITH HIS CLIENT AND WILL RETURN TO THE BOARD AT A <br />FUTURE MEETING. <br />e 7 -- <br />,SEP 19 193 <br />.4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.