2008-011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORDINANCE 2008- 011 comprehensive plan and the programming of capital improvements, including public school facilities. (Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90) SECTION #2: Amend "Development review system" LDR Sub -Section 910.07(3), (4), and (5), to read as follows: (3) The designation of a single agency for coordinating each level of the concurrency review process is necessary to ensure that every concurrency application is reviewed in accordance with these regulations prior to the issuance of a development order. The community development department shall be the coordinating agency for the concurrency review process and shall be responsible for coordinating the review of the development applications identified in section 910.07(1) and for approving or rejecting concurrency determinations. The community development director shall initiate the review process by review of an application for completeness and data sufficiency within three (3) days of receipt of the application. A copy of the complete application will then be forwarded to the evaluating departments and the school district aencie gs Upon submission, each concurrency application will be placed in a queue Each application will then be evaluated in the order in which it was received. As each application is evaluated, the demand reflected by that application will be compared to the available capacity for each facility, as described in sections 910.08, 910.09 and 910.11. As demand is allocated by approving applications, available capacity will be reduced. If any facility has insufficient capacity to accommodate a proposed application, the following will occur: (a) If the applicant has indicated on his concurrency application that he would accept less capacity than requested if available capacity is inadequate to accommodate his demand, then he will be allocated the remaining available capacity, and the concurrency certificate will be conditioned on a comparable reduction in project size. (b) If the applicant has indicated on his concurrency application that he would not accept less capacity than requested if available capacity is inadequate to accommodate his demand, then his application request will be denied. An applicant may have the option to apply for proportionate fair -share mitigation for transportation facilities or public school facilities. Regulations for proportionate fair -share mitigation for transportation facilities are provided in section 910.12, below. Regulations for proportionate fair -share mitigation for public school facilities are provided in section 910.13, below. (4) The following departments and school district shall be responsible for evaluating the adequacy of existing and planned facilities with regard to concurrency applications: (a) The utilities department shall evaluate solid waste levels of service; (b) The public works department shall evaluate roadway levels of service; (c) The public works department shall evaluate drainage levels of service; (d) The utilities department shall evaluate potable water levels of service; Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance &tfilee-tlfeeglt Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\ORDINANCE\2008\2008- School Concurrencychanges.doc 2