2002-025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORDINANCE NO. 2002= 025 (c) Vested final subdivision plats to be modified unless modification creates additional lots; (d) Developments with a final development order proceeding to completion; (e) Replacement of existing residential units unless there is an increase in number of units; and (f) Any development orders, including land use amendments and rezoning applications, which do not increase density or intensity of use. (3) The designation of a single agency for coordinating responsible for each level adequacy of the concurrency Elete.,,,inat;^^ review process is necessary to ensure that every concurrency de*e:minatie^ application is reviewed in accordance with these regulations and planned prior to the issuance concurrency of a applications: development order. The community development department shall be responsible for coordinating the review of the development applications identified in section 910.07(1) development and for approving or rejecting concurrency determinations. The community director shall initiate the review process by review of an application for completeness and A data sufficiency within three (3) days of receipt of the application. copy of the complete application will then be forwarded to the evaluating agencies. Upon submission, each concurrency d€n application will be placed in a queue. Each application will then be evaluated in the order in which it was received. As each application is evaluated, the demand reflected by that application will be compared to the available capacity for each facility, as described in sections 910.08, 910.09 and 910.11. As demand is allocated by approving applications, available capacity will be reduced. If i -n any facility has insufficient capacity is available to accommodate toe a proposed application, the following will occur: (a) If the applicant has indicated on his application that he would accept less capacity than requested if available capacity is inadequate to accommodate his demand, then he will be allocated the remaining available capacity and the concurrency certificate will be conditioned on a comparable reduction in project size. (b) If the applicant has indicated on his application that he would not accept less capacity than requested if available capacity is inadequate to accommodate his demand, then his application request will be denied. (4) The following departments shall be responsible for evaluating the adequacy of existing facilities to and planned with regard concurrency applications: Coding: Words in sirikn., type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions