2002-025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORDINANCE NO. 2002=025 (a) The utilities department shall evaluate solid waste levels of service; (b) The public works department and eemmunity development depaAment shall evaluate roadway levels of service; (c) The public works department shall evaluate drainage levels of service; (d) The utilities department shall evaluate potable water levels of service; (e) The utilities department shall evaluate sanitary sewer levels of service; and (f) The community development department shall evaluate park levels of service. (5) The evaluating agencies, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the application from the community development department, shall provide the coordinating agency a letter or other instrument for each concurrency detofmination application. The evaluating agencies shall assess the level of service for all facilities which will be impacted by the proposed development, determine the extent of the impact generated by the proposed development, and determine whether those facilities have sufficient capacity to serve the development at, or above, adopted levels of service. The applicant shall meet all the requirements of the evaluating agencies in order to be eligible for approval of the concurrency Eletefminatieii application. No concurrency certificate detefminat4eff will be approved until each evaluating agency is satisfied that sufficient capacity is available to accommodate the demand represented by the application. The applicant, through an enforceable development agreement with the evaluating agency, may mitigate deficiencies in order to satisfy the concurrency review. (6) The coordinating agency will be responsible for compiling the level of service reviews into a concurrency report within five (5) days after receipt of the evaluating agencies' report for each concurrency deteFminatien application identified in section 910.08(2), except for final concurrency detem4ination applications. Each concurrency report will document: (a) The current land use and zoning designation, type and intensity of proposed use, and public facility availability upon which the reviews were based; (b) The specific facilities impacted by the proposed development; (c) The extent of the impact on those facilities by the proposed development; and Coding: Words in strike type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions 6