Laserfiche WebLink
ORDINANCE N0.2002- 02' <br />(d) Conditions or stipulations <br />regarding <br />the <br />timing and <br />development <br />phasing <br />under <br />of the <br />development <br />account <br />during the concurrency <br />or <br />provision of facility <br />improvements <br />necessary to ensure <br />that <br />adequate facilities <br />will <br />be available concurrent <br />with the <br />impact of the development. <br />(7) For each concurrency detefminatien application review, the coordinating agency will be <br />responsible for monitoring and enforcing any conditions and/or stipulations contained in <br />previous concurrency determinations. This will be done in order to ensure that consistent <br />concurrency review procedures are maintained and that unnecessary duplication as a <br />result of different concurrency detef inert'^^ reviews is avoided. <br />(Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90; Ord. No. 91-23, § 4, 5-15-91; Ord. No. 91-48, § 8, 12-4-91; Ord. <br />No. 92-39, § 6, 9-29-92; Ord. No. 96-6, § 10, 2-27-96) <br />I Section 910.08 is hereby amended to read as follows: <br />Section 910.08. Determination of concurrency, <br />(1) Consistent with the comprehensive plan policies, the apprc <br />shall be contingent upon a finding that adequate public faci <br />with their adopted levels of service and concurrent with the <br />development. Such determination of concurrency made dui <br />concurrency deter application which is not an initi <br />certificate Elaeterminatietf does not guarantee that there will <br />concurrency at subsequent steps in the process for a given <br />development. However, a finding of concurrency made at t <br />Elete ..Y.in t;^^ stage may be used as a basis for a finding of <br />during the review of a final concurrency detefm pati app <br />(a) The previously approved concurrency determir <br />determined by the time limit imposed upon the <br />certificate; <br />(b) <br />The <br />impact <br />of the proposed <br />development <br />under <br />con <br />account <br />during the concurrency <br />review and in the <br />fi <br />associated <br />with the previously <br />approved concurrent <br />ities are available, consistent <br />impact of the proposed <br />ng the review of a <br />I or final concurrency <br />utomatically be a finding of <br />roperty or a proposed <br />e initial concurrency <br />;oncurrency determination <br />cation provided that: <br />remains in effect, as <br />zrrencv determination <br />was fully taken into <br />ling of concurrency <br />detefm natio certificate; <br />(c) The conditions related to land uses and facility availability upon which the <br />previous finding was based have not changed due to an act of nature or other <br />situation out of the county's control; and <br />(d) All conditions or stipulations regarding the timing or phasing of the development <br />or the provision of facility improvement by either the developer or the county <br />Coding: Words in strip type are deletions from existing law. Words underlined are additions 7 <br />