Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element <br />Statutory and Rule Changes Since 1990 <br />Consistent with legislation passed in 1993, all local governments in the state were scheduled to <br />revise their intergovernmental coordination elements (ICE) in 1996-97. Subsequent to passage of the <br />1993 legislation, a new ICE rule was developed and incorporated into Section 9J-5 of the Florida <br />Administrative Code. According to the adopted rule, each local government's new <br />intergovernmental coordination element would have to: <br />• Identify all regional and state resources and facilities identified in the state <br />comprehensive plan and regional policy plan for the jurisdiction and surrounding <br />jurisdictions. <br />• Identify local resources and facilities, and community characteristics which could <br />impact development outside of the jurisdiction. <br />• Identify resources and facilities outside of the jurisdiction which could be impacted <br />by development within the jurisdiction. <br />• Define "significant impact" on each resource, facility and community characteristic. <br />Identify what type of development or development permits will cause "significant <br />impact". The significant impact may be quantitative, locational and/or qualitative. <br />• Describe "mitigation criteria and standards" for each resource, facility, and <br />community characteristic within the jurisdiction. <br />• In coordination with other jurisdictions, develop an intergovernmental coordination <br />review process to determine if a project has significant extra -local impacts, and <br />identify how to mitigate such impacts. <br />• In coordination with other jurisdictions, develop a joint resolution which certifies <br />compatibility between local governments' intergovernmental coordination elements. <br />• Incorporate the regional planning council dispute resolution process within the <br />intergovernmental coordination element. <br />• Include other specific requirements <br />Subsequent to adoption of the new rules, there was a substantial amount of debate about the new ICE <br />provisions and the proposed termination of the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process. For <br />that reason, the 1995 Florida legislature postponed the ICE adoption schedule and called for the <br />establishment of an ICE Technical Review Committee which was to report to the 1996 legislature <br />with recommendations for proposed rule and statutory changes. <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 48 <br />