Laserfiche WebLink
L 2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />' 7 <br />Q <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />' 23 <br />' 24 <br />25 <br />sr,all area that's not in the Rockridge development that we <br />think we can service. <br />As T say, it came to our attention at that time <br />that there's, there was a possibility of federal funding to <br />assist in paying for the cost of this project. It's a large <br />project and the feecral funding aspect would help greatly in <br />�clT)ing vot, afford the project. <br />The County has followed a Policy in building <br />utilities that the cost of constr>>ction of utilities in anv <br />specific area should not detrimentally affect user, existing <br />users on the system. So new customers are supposed to pay <br />for the project that 'benefits them and it cannot cost otter <br />old customers anything at all within their rate structure. <br />And I'm sure you can appreciate that for when and if v ou <br />become customers, if some new developrren.t needs waste -water <br />facilities, you do not want that cost to he added into your <br />rate structure so you would he paying for someone else's <br />problem. So we followed that policy. <br />But at the same time, we went ahead and applied <br />for an EPA, which is the Environmental Protection Agency, <br />the united States Environmental Protection Agency, and the <br />PFR, which is the State Pepartment of Fnvironmer.tal <br />Pegulations, to apply for a grant that nays for a portion of <br />voter system. <br />Now, in the original feasibility, we Oetermired <br />ZAMBATARO f ASSOCIATFS <br />A computer Assisted Transcript <br />